HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-01-21 MINUTESREGULAR MEETING
COTTAGE GROVE CITY COUNCIL
January 21, 2004
OPEN FORUM — 7:15 p.m.
Open forum provides a person an opportunity to inform the Council of a problem or to
request information related to City business not scheduled for Council action and on the
Agenda. Mayor Shiely encouraged persons to limit their remarks to two (2) minutes per
issue.
Present: Mayor Sandy Shiely
Council Member Cheryl Kohls
Council Member Pat Rice
Council Member Jim Wolcott
Council Member Mark Grossklaus
Also Present: Ryan Schroeder, City Administrator
Ron Hedberg, Finance Director
John McCool, Senior Planner
Tom Thompson, Consultant, City Engineer
John Mickelson, Public Safety Director
Les Burshten, Public Works Director
Corrine Thomson, Consultant, City Attorney
No one stepped forward to speak during Open Forum.
CALL TO ORDER
The City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, Washington County, Minnesota held a regular
meeting on Wednesday, January 21, 2004, at the Cottage Grove City Hall, 7516 80"' Street
South. Mayor Sandy Shiely called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present: Mayor Sandy Shiely
Council Member Cheryl Kohls
Council Member Pat Rice
Council Member Jim Wolcott
Council Member Mark Grossklaus
Also Present:Ryan Schroeder, City Administrator
Ron Hedberg, Finance Director
John McCool, Senior Planner
Regular Meeting — January 21, 2004
Cottage Grove City Council
Page 2
Tom Thompson, Consultant, City Engineer
John Mickelson, Public Safety Director
Les Burshten, Public Works Director
Corrine Thomson, Consultant, City Attorney
Mayor Shiely presided over the meeting.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA
Mayor Shiely stated that there is an addition to the agenda. Deputy Fire Chief Dennis
Leonard and Firefighter ponna Honeyman will present the evaluation results from the
October 4, 2003 Emergency Exercise.
MOTION BY WOLCOTT, SECONDED BY RICE, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS
AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
APPOINTMENTS AND PRESENTATIONS
A. PRESENTATIONS
1. Biq Brothers/Big Sisters Proqram
Scot Johnson, Match Coordinator for Big Brothers Big Sisters, thanked the Council for their
time, stating that they are celebrating their 100-year anniversary, matching children with
adults since 1920. He stated that there are three main programs: Community Based
Mentoring, Club Connect for children waiting for community-based mentoring, and a school-
based mentoring program. Johnson indicated that the school-based mentoring program has
been in existence for five years noting that they recently received a grant for Crestview
Elementary and Lake Elmo Elementary. He provided the Council with a brief overview of the
each program including the referral and matching process, the time commitment, age
requirements, schedule flexibility, and activities. Johnson commented that they are always
looking for volunteers noting that the program not only benefits the children, it also benefits
the adults who volunteer too. He encouraged the community to consider volunteering for the
program. He said that anyone who would like information about the program could contact
him directly at 612-789-2449 or visit their website at www.bigstwincities.org.
2. Fire Department — October 4, 2003 Emerqency Exercise
Mayor Shiely stated that on October 4, 2003, the City of Cottage Grove participated in an
emergency exercise drill and Deputy Chief Dennis Leonard and Firefighter ponna Honeyman
from the Cottage Grove Fire Department are here to present the results of the exercise.
Firefighter ponna Honeyman stated that approximately one year ago they were approached
with a proposal to put together and design a plan that would test their response to an
emergency. She provided the Council with an overview of the exercise and explained that
the exercise involved the simu�ation of a train derailment with a chemical spill and their ability
Regular Meeting — January 21, 2004
Cottage Grove City Council
Page 3
to determine how to effectively respond and notify the community. She stated that the
exercise included 275 participants from the City of Cottage Grove, City of Woodbury, Onex,
and Canadian Pacific Railway. Pianning for the exercise began in January 2003 with an
intensive, weeklong training session at the FEMA Emergency Management Institute. She
noted that the biggest thing they wanted to learn was whether they could manage a situation
of this magnitude, and through this process, they found that they could. She stated that with
the help of Onex and Canadian Pacific, they developed the team and determined what was
needed for the exercise. The process identified 17 objectives adding that 15 of those
objectives were met. She indicated that the learning process was a huge success noting that
they were able to exercise their objectives, even with so much to accomplish. She reviewed
the lessons learned noting that through the process they learned that they should work to
limit the information that is released before the exercise noting that they would utilize an
internal representative for the next time. She provided the Council with an overview of the
EOC (Emergency Operation Center) and its functions stating that they need to redefine the
roles for EOC staff and reevaluate the layout of the center itself to configure it for optimal
performance. She stated that they should reevaluate and update the communication
systems and channels. She thanked the Council and all of the other organizations that were
involved for their assistance and support.
Deputy Fire Chief Leonard stated that one of the big things they see and find in doing an
exercise of this nature is that communication can be a problem. He indicated that this is one
of those items that is always addressed and modified. He referenced the evaluation packet
provided to Council for their review stating that they have put together a Subcommittee to
work through the issues identified from the exercise and provide follow-ups throughout the
year.
Firefighter Honeyman stated that one of the incident mitigation lessons that they learned
showed that they can interact well with outside agencies and that they worked well as a
team. She stated that they are very confident that in the event of an actual emergency they
would function well and efficiently. She noted that communication is a concern and would be
reviewed.
Deputy Fire Chief Leonard provided the Council with an overview of the process noting that
the information provided in the evaluation packet came from all of the evaluations received
by the City, County and State evaluators. He explained that any City or unit of Government
that receives a performance grant is required to foflow a four-year cycle for emergency
exercises. He stated that they would be involved in some form of exercise for the next four
years in order to meet this mandate. He reviewed the Subcommittee responsibilities and
indicated that they would identify what is required to improve the communications and work
with him and Firefighter Honeyman to resolve the issues.
Firefighter Honeyman reviewed the information content of the evaluation packet with Council.
She stated that the State of Minnesota's evaluation report was submitted in December and
noted that the report also includes the time and action calendar. She stated that copies of
the evaluation have also been forwarded to Onex and Canadian Pacific. She noted that
Onex was so impressed with the evaluation packet that they have asked their permission to
Regular Meeting — January 21, 2004
Cottage Grove City Council
Page 4
utilize the format for future reports. She stated that the calendar is filed with the Federal
Government noting that they do keep track of what they are doing. She stated that the
Prairie Island drill is due this year in addition to a functional exercise that would be scheduled
in 2005.
Deputy Chief Leonard stated that this has been a very positive experience for both him and
Firefighter Honeyman. He indicated that the feedback they have received has been very
positive noting that the experience itself has also been a very positive one for the Fire
Department. He stated that they have several items to work on throughout the year including
training, updates, communication, and upgrades and added that 'Learning' is what it was all
about.
Firefighter Honeyman stated that Channel 16 was also on site throughout the exercise and
raw video footage is available for viewing.
Council Member Kohls noted the communications issue and asked for further clarification on
the equipment they use to communicate and how they communicate with the various
agencies, locations, and people involved.
Deputy Chief Leonard explained that the issues are a combination of how they communicate,
the equipment needed in the EOC and the process they use to communicate with the outside
agencies and locations. He explained that they should find something other than cell phones
to rely on and that they need to identify various frequencies that would be available during a
disaster. He noted that typically communication is the number one item identified as an
issue adding that communication is always in the process of being tweaked in an effort to
keep up with technology.
Council Member Kohls stated that the amount of communication was unreal and shared her
impressions of the exercise with Council noting that the experience seemed so real. She
acknowledged the true need for good communication. She stated that everyone did a
phenomenal job adding that this will be one of her most memorable experiences.
Mayor Shiely stated that in her years as Mayor this is probably the most beneficial thing she
has ever taken part in and wanted them to know how much it was appreciated. She noted
that they did a fantastic job adding that she is sure now that they are as safe as a City could
be and thanked them, on behalf of the Council, for all of their efforts and hard work.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. December 3, 2003 Regular Meeting
Mayor Shiely stated that the minutes stand approved as presented.
B. December 9, 2003 Special Meeting.
Mayor Shiely stated that the minutes stand approved as presented.
Regular Meeting — January 21, 2004
Cottage Grove City Council
Page 5
C. December 17, 2003 Special Meeting.
Mayor Shiely stated that the minutes stand approved as presented.
D. December 17, 2003 Regular Meeting.
Mayor Shiely stated that the minutes stand approved as presented.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Shiely stated that Item 4L, a donation from Merchants Bank, has been added to the
Consent Calendar.
MOTION BY GROSSKLAUS, SECONDED BY RICE, TO:
A. ACCEPT AND PLACE ON FILE THE FOLLOWING MINUTES:
I. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF NOVEMBER 18, 2003
AND DECEMBER 9, 2003.
II. HUMAN SERVICES/HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION FOR 2003.
IIi. PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION OF NOVEMBER 10, 2003.
B. APPROVE THE RATE SCHEDULE FOR ENGINEERING SERV�CES FROM
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK, AND ASSOCIATES FOR 2004.
C. APPOINT MARY HAKEEM TO THE HUMAN RIGHTS/SERVICES COMMISSION
YOUTH SEAT.
D. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 04-006 AUTHORIZING ENTRANCE INTO MN/DOT
AGREEMENT NO. 85942 FOR TREE-LOSS MITIGATION AT COTTAGE GROVE
PARK AND RIDE SITE.
E. APPROVE CITY COUNCIL GOALS FOR 2004.
F. RECEIVE RESPONSE TO CITIZEN EDITORIAL PUBLISHED IN THE SOUTH
WASHINGTON COUNTY BULLETIN CONCERNING ACCESSIBILITY AT THE NEW
PARK AND RIDE.
G. AUTHORIZE GREY CLOUD ELEMENTARY PTA TO CONDUCT A SINGLE-
OCCASION RAFFLE ON APRIL 23, 2004 AND DENY THE REQUEST FOR WAIVER
OF THE $100.00 GAMBLING PERMIT FEE.
H. ADOPT ORD/NANCE NO. 755 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 5-4-4
PARAGRAPH D.1 OF THE COTTAGE GROVE CITY CODE RELATING TO
MULTIPLE ANIMAL LICENSES.
I. APPROVE THE ACTIONS OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
ALLOWING FOR SALE AND SEVERANCE OF THE WELLS-FARGO/MAINSTREET
BANK PARCEL FROM THE GROVE-RAINBOW PROPERTY AND ADOPT
RESOLUTION NO. 04-007 APPROVING A MODIFIED ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT
REGARDING LOT 1, BLOCK 1, GROVE PLAZA2
J. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 04-008 APPROVING THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS
AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE WELL #11 PUMPING FACILITY AND SETTING A
BID DATE OF FEBRUARY 12, 2004 AT 11:00 A.M.
Regular Meeting — January 21, 2004
Cottage Grove City Council
Page 6
K. APPROVE THE APPLICATION OF SCOTT SERFLING FOR A MULTIPLE ANIMAL
LICENSE FOR 2004 TO MAINTAIN FOUR (4) DOGS AT HIS RESIDENCE AT 88149
76 STREET SOUTH CONTINGENT ON COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOUR (4)
ITEMS OUTLINED IN CITY CLERK'S REPORT.
L. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 04-009 ACCEPTING A DONATION FROM MERCHANTS
BANK FOR THE COTTAGE GROVE RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND TEENS IN
ACTION'S MEDALLION HUNT.
MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
RESPONSE TO PREVIOUSLY RAISED OPEN FORUM ISSUES
A. Response to Darlene Bradsteen Reqardinq Adult Foster Home at 9032 Jareau
Avenue South.
Mayor Shiely clarified that a letter of response was sent to Ms. Bradsteen. Senior Planner
McCool confirmed that a letter of response was sent noting that she did not respond.
PUBLIC HEARWGS
NONE
BID AWARDS
A. Consider Awardinq the Bid for Replacement of the River Oaks Golf Shop Clubhouse
Furnace.
Mayor Shiely reviewed the bid stating that during a routine inspection of the furnace located
in the Golf Shop Clubhouse, a service inspector notified staff of rusting of the existing
furnace. She stated that it was also noted that the existing furnace might last the remainder
of 2004. A dangerous situation could result in carbon monoxide poisoning. She stated that
they received bids for the replacement of the furnace and that after review of the bids, Staff
is recommending awarding the bid to O'Connor Plumbing and Heating.
MOTION BY WOLCOTT, SECONDED BY KOHLS, TO AWARD THE BID TO O'CONNOR
PLUMBING AND HEATING FOR THE PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF A FURNACE
IN THE RIVER OAKS GOLF SHOP CLUBBHOUSE FOR $5,965.00 (INCLUDES SALES
TAX). MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS
A. Consider a Variance to Title 11-15-8C(1), Structure Setback from Bluff Line, which
requires a 100-foot Minimum Structure Setback from a Bluff Line, to Allow
Construction of a Sinale-Familv Dwellina Closer than 100 Feet from the Bluff Line ;
Regular Meeting — January 21, 2004
Cottage Grove City Council
Page 7
Mayor Shiely indicated that the Council has considered this request before noting that at a
previous meeting, the Council did grant a variance for the density and requested that the
application be returned to the Planning Commission for further discussion and review. She
stated that the request has come back from the Planning Commission with their
recommendation for denial. She asked Senior Planner McCool to clarify further.
Senior Planner McCool stated that the Planning Commission did recommend denial in a 4-3
vote. He explained that as part of the planning office review, he had provided the Planning
Commission with a recommendation that the house structure have a setback of 31 feet. He
noted that some of the Planning Commissioners felt that this was a reasonable compromise.
Mayor Shiely noted that there were four (4) votes to deny and three (3) to approve and asked
if the Commissioners were in favor of the compromise or the 18-foot. Senior Planner McCool
stated that there was a mixture of opinions.
Senior Planner McCool stated that the Werners provided an aerial topographical photograph
of the property and a site plan that shows the proposed �ocation of the house on the property.
He stated that Staff transposed the location of the house and reviewed the changes with
Council. He explained that by scaling the proposal of the site plan that the setback would be
approximately 18 feet from the bluff line. He stated that the homeowner would prefer to
place the house on the property as originally proposed and is not willing to change the
location. He explained that the City Code deals with property platted before April 1985. He
stated that Staff has provided a draft of two resolutions. The first, as recommended by the
Planning Commission, to deny the application, and the second, a resolution approving the
application with the requirement of 31-foot setback based on the height of building in
addition, any accessory structure would have a minimum setback of 20 feet from the biuff
elevation.
Council Member Kohls asked for clarification of the maximum height requirement for an
accessory building. Senior Planner McCool clarified that the maximum height for an
accessory structure is 18 feet.
Council Member Kohls clarified the applicant is not satisfied with the recommended 31-foot
setback and wants the 18 feet.
Mr. Werner clarified that it is not that he is not in favor of the 31-foot setback; he would vastly
prefer the 18-feet. He explained that his major reason to build on the lot is for the view and
by placing it back at 31 feet reduces the view. He stated that he has lived here since 1965
and loves the view. He agreed that there was notification in the Red River Act that if he did
not plat the land at that time that he would have to apply for a variance. He stated that he did
do the legal split in 1986 and was told at that time that it was not a buildable site because
City water and sewer were not available at that time. He explained that by definition it is now
a buildable site subject to the setback requirements. He stated that the 100-foot setback is
unrealistic in view of the locations of the other homes in the area. He clarified that his
request is to be allowed to build, preferably, with the 18-foot setback. He stated that it is not
in conflict with the intent of the River Corridor Act adding that the property is setback enough
Regular Meeting — January 21, 2004
Cottage Grove City Council
Page 8
that it is invisible from the channel. He stated that it would only be visible to a few anglers
that could manage to get into the backwater areas, as it is a very shallow area.
Council Member Grossklaus stated that his main concern is in creating precedence and that
it makes the land so valuable that people would begin to remove the current homes to build
larger homes. He expressed concerns about the potential loss of trees and the possibility
that it would begin a stream of residents who want to rebuild.
Mayor Shiely agreed with Council Member Grossklaus' concerns about setting a precedent.
She referenced discussion and questions that were raised regarding previous variances
granted in the corridor stating that she has been involved with the corridor since 1991 noting
that all applications for variances in the river corridor area has been for density. She noted
that the river corridor line goes back to 110� Street stating that the variation of density in this
area would not affect as much. She stated that the only setback variance request she was
involved in was at the golf course where they wanted to install a swimming pool. She agreed
that this could establish a precedent and asked if they have granted any setback variances in
the River Acres area.
Senior Planner McCool clarified that since 1984 the City has received nine (9) applications.
Council Member Wolcott referenced the discussion about tree removal and asked if this has
been resolved. Senior Planner McCool explained that one of the stipulations is that there be
no disturbance of the vegetation in the area between the bluff line and the elevation. He
stated that there is a large amount of sumac that the applicant wants to remove but it has
been stipulated that the sumac cannot be removed.
Council Member Wolcott asked what could be done if the sumac is removed. Senior Planner
McCool stated that it would become a code enforcement issue and a penalty could be
applied. He stated that they could secure a financial guarantee in the event that removal did
occur that would cover the costs to replant.
Council Member Wolcott requested that the penalty be included as a part of the motion as a
condition in the event that vegetation is removed.
City Attorney Thomson clarified that unless they obtain a financial guarantee now, before
approval of the variance, their only option would be to pursue a criminal violation or citation in
the event that any vegetation is removed.
Council Member Kohls asked if they would be able to determine a dollar amount that could
be included.
Council Member Wolcott agreed stating that this is what he is asking. He stated that he
wants to be sure that everyone understands that there is a penalty that has been identified
and would be enforced.
Regular Meeting — January 21, 2004
Cottage Grove City Council
Page 9
City Attorney Thomson explained that they have two options, one would be to require the
amount to be posted now, or two, they could require it as a condition that the party enter into
an agreement that could be recorded against the property that would provide that no trees be
removed and the City could reclaim via small claims court. She stated that the second option
would be more practical.
Council Member Kohls asked if this condition would follow the property to the next owner.
City Attorney Thomson clarified that this would be the objective noting that it is a declaration
that states a restriction on the property is run by the City and carries a monetary obligation to
cover costs for replacement of vegetation.
Council Member Wolcott stated that he is willing to support a variance at 31-feet but wants a
stipulation included that no vegetation is removed. He stated that his preference would be to
have something in writing and recorded so that all owners would have to abide by the
restriction.
City Attorney Thomson suggested providing it in the resolution that the applicant has a
restriction on the property that no vegetation can be removed. She stated that she would
prepare the language to go in place of paragraph eight (8).
Mr. Werner noted that there is a provision in the corridor packet that regulates what can be
done with vegetation along the bluff line.
Council Member Wolcott clarified that this condition would restrict removal of vegetation from
a certain level of the bluff line. Mr. Werner expressed concerns that if the sumac spreads to
his yard and he removes it from his yard that he could be in violation.
Council Member Wolcott noted that in order to give the variance and have a comfort that the
vegetation is protected the stipulation would have to be included in the resotution. Council
Member Kohls agreed.
Mr. Werner clarified that his concerns are with the buckthorn, sumac, and weed vegetation.
Council Member Kohls stated they should have some documentation that would clarify the
good vegetation from the bad noting that they do not want the buckthorn. She stated that her
concern is in preserving the trees.
City Attorney Thomson explained that the applicant must record a restriction against the
property in favor of the City in a format approved by the City Attorney. She clarified that no
vegetation other than noxious vegetation can be disturbed. She stated that when she
approves the restriction that is drafted she could then deal with the issues raised by Council.
Council Member Kohls stated that this would be a workabie solution.
Mayor Shiely reviewed her concerns noting that she does not see the view as a hardship.
Regular Meeting — January 21, 2004
Cottage Grove Ciry Council
Page 10
MOTION BY KOHLS, SECONDED BY WOLCOTT, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 04-010
GRANTING A VARIANCE TO TITLE 11-15-8C(1) TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A
HOUSE LESS THAN 100 FEET FROM THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER BLUFF LINE AT 7641-
113 STREET SOUTH AND TO ALLOW THEM TO BUILD AT 31-FEET. MOTION
CARRIED 3-2 (SHIELY/GROSSKLAUS — NAY)
MOTION BY KOHLS, SECONDED BY WOLCOTT, TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO
ITEM NUMBER 8 REGARDING REMOVAL OF VEGETATION AND THAT THE CITY
ATTORNEY AND MR. WERNER WILL WORK OUT THE DETAILS. MOTION CARRIED 4-1
(GROSSKLAUS — NAY)
B. Consider Application of Tennis Brothers Sanitation LLC for a Residential Dwellinq
Solid Waste License.
Public Works Director Les Burshten stated the City received an application from Tennis
Brothers Sanitation, LLC, for a residential dwelling solid waste license. He stated that the
application was presented to the City Council at the January 7, 2004 meeting and that
Council directed the Public Works Commission to review and make a recommendation
regarding the license. He stated that the Public Works Commission discussed the
application during the meeting held on January 12, 2004. City Clerk Caron Stransky
attended the meeting and answered questions from the Commission Members regarding
compliance of the newly formed company. He stated that Greg and William Tennis, the
owners of Tennis Brothers Sanitation were also present to answer questions. He stated that
upon review, the Public Works Commission made a motion to unanimously recommend
approval of the residential dwelling solid waste license application from Tennis Brothers
Sanitation LLC.
William Tennis acknowledged that they attended the Public Works Commission meeting
noting that the Commission is satisfied with their application.
Gary Boyum, Municipal Marketing Manager, Waste Management, stated that he is the only
competitor licensed in Cottage Grove and that as a competitor, he believes that good
competition is a healthy business environment and feels that if the Council does not approve
the application that the City is restricting fair competition within the City of Cottage Grove.
Mayor Shiely thanked the Public Works Commission for their work on this request. She
stated that she has no objection to this proposal noting that she has been a customer of
Tennis for over 30 years. She stated that they have a long record of doing a lot of good in
City and for the Community. She noted that the legal review has clarified that a second
license to the same entity does not pose any legal issues or concerns. She stated that the
City appreciates the donations the company has made to the City over the years noting that
Council must be careful not to make their decisions based on donations made to the City but
based on the level of service provided to the taxpayers. She noted that at one time in
Cottage Grove they had approximately nine residential haulers adding that they had to lower
the number due to the wear and tear on the City roads. She stated that the City also realizes
that they must give the citizens a choice and agreed that competition in the City is fair and
Regular Meeting — January 21, 2004
Cottage Grove City Council
Page 11
healthy. She stated that her only concern is that the spirit of competition could be lost. She
stated that she has no problem with a third license being filled by a new company created by
Tennis. She proposed that the City make a fourth license available for trash hauling in
Cottage Grove noting that the license would probably continue to remain open. She noted
that the new company would not increase the number of vehicles on the road and does not
see this as an issue. She stated that this is a reasonable request and would like to direct
staff to prepare an ordnance amendment to send down to Public Works for review.
Council Member Wolcott noted that he was involved with Pubiic Works when they had a
number of haulers in Cottage Grove. He clarified that the intent was to limit the number of
haulers due to potential damage to streets. He explained that the City was going through a
pavement management project at the time and did not want to have to redo the streets. He
stated that when this ordinance was proposed and approved it stated that the City would not
allow more than three haulers. He noted that the new company would not be competing for
routes and would not be adding additional trucks. He noted that Greg & Willie own Tennis
Sanitation and their children are starting the new company. He noted that they would also
have presence in other cities. He stated that he would be against a fourth license and would
not support adding another license to the City.
MOTION BY KOHLS, SECONDED BY RICE, TO AUTHORIZE ISSUANCE OF A
RESIDENTIAL SOLID WASTE LICENSE TO TENNIS BROTHERS SANITATION, LLC.,
FOR THE PERIOD ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2004. MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
RESPONSE TO PREVIOUSLY RAISED COUNCIL COMMENTS AND REQUESTS
Council Member Kohls wanted to make everyone aware that the Public Safety, Health and
Welfare Commission is sponsoring a blood drive on February 11, 2004 at Fire Station 1
located at 80 and Grange Blvd. She stated it would be held from 2:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.,
and encouraged the community to come out and volunteer to give blood.
COUNCIL COMMENTS AND REQUESTS - NONE
PAY BILLS
MOTION BY WOLCOTT, SECONDED BY RICE, TO APPROVE PAYMENT OF CHECK
NUMBERS 132766 THROUGH 132962 TOTALING $1,189,355.56. (CHECKS 132766 —
132791 FOR $184,483.44 ISSUED BEFORE COUNCIL APPROVAL.) MOTION CARRIED
5-0.
WORKSHOP SESSION — OPEN - NONE
WORKSHOP SESSION — CLOSED - NONE
Regular Meeting — January 21, 2004
Cottage Grove City Council
Page 12
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION BY RICE, SECONDED BY GROSSKLAUS, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 8:45
P.M. MOTION CARRIED 5-0.
Respectfully submitted,
Bonita Sullivan
Timesavers Off Site Secretarial, Inc.