HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-12-16 PACKET 08.A.REQUEST OF CITY COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL AGENDA
MEETING ITEM #
DATE 12 -16 -09
Finance
ORIGINATING DEPARTMEN 1
Robin Roland
STAFF AUTHOR
COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST
Consider adopting the 2010 -2014 Capital Improvement Program.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the 2010 -2014 Capital Improvement Program,
BUDGET IMPLICATION
BUDGETED AMOUNT
ADVISORY COMMISSION ACTION
DATE
❑ PLANNING
❑ PUBLIC SAFETY
❑ PUBLIC WORKS
❑ PARKS AND RECREATION
❑ HUMAN SERVICES /RIGHTS
❑ ECONOMIC DEV. AUTHORITY
El
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
® MEMO /LETTER:
❑ RESOLUTION:
❑ ORDINANCE:
❑ ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION:
❑ LEGAL RECOMMENDATION:
® OTHER: 2010 -2014 CIP
REVIEWED
El
El
El
El
El
ACTUAL AMOUNT
APPROVED DENIED
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS
fff
fxf 'u a
City Administrator Date
COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: APPROVED ❑ DENIED ❑ OTHER
l:\common \CIP \2010- 2014\CC Action Form adopt CIP.doc
City of Cottage Grove
Finance and Administrative Services Department
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Ryan Schroeder, City Administrator
FROM: Robin Roland, Finance Director
Brenda Peper, Financial Analyst
Jennifer Levitt, City Engineer
DATE: December 8, 2009
RE: Adopt 2010 -2014 Capital Improvements Program
Introduction
The 2010 -2014 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) is attached for consideration.
Background
The attached CIP draft is based on the results of the 2010/2011 budget
discussions during the past summer, and the Council workshop this fall regarding
the CIP. A significant number of projects have been postponed in this year's
version of the CIP because of the downturn in the construction market and the
anticipation of continuing cuts in State Aid.
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the CIP at their 11/23/2009
meeting which is required for amending the Comprehensive Plan which includes
the CIP. An excerpt of the unapproved minutes of the Planning Commission
meeting is attached.
For ?nio the CIP includes 57.9 million in oroiects and thev are listed below.
Description I Location
Sealcoat/Crackfilling Program
Highla Park ;Volunteer
Streets, sidewalk /curb repl acement, & trails
tree planti event
Total
$ 608,200
15,000
- --
- --
Hamlet Park
Pinetree Valle Park
Building repairs
Building repairs
17,000
45,000
Parks
Hamlet Trail ------ - -
- -
Hearthside Park
Master plan community pa
95th Street to Park
-- --
Replace hockey rink boar
15,000
75,000
- -- -
8,000
_
He arthside Park
West Dra and Meadow Grass
Trail connection
,Trail connection
5,000
5,00 0
Lamar Park -
Golf Course
Lights
- — -
New Sign
4,000
-
45,000
Ice Arena
Ice A rena
New Sign
Deh umidifier
45,000
40,000
Ic Arena
Bleacher heat - Center section West Rink
12,000
- - --
- - - --
6 5th Street (County Road 74)
---------------
Reconstruction to 4 Lanes Urban
2,700,000
Pinecli 2nd Addition Phase 2
Development
2,213 83_9
R iver Acres
Pavement Manag ement H1 Reconstruction
849,800
River Acr
j Pavement Management H2 Reconstruction
575,000
West Point Douglas and Beld at RR
Quiet zone
45,000
ED-P8, E -P5, ED -P1, Lamar WD P(multi)
Storm water pond improvements
246,000
Hamlet Ave S to 95th St
Access trails to tr unk sanitary sewers
25,500
80th St to Jeffrey E of Ja maica
75th St to 80th, E of Jamaica
Access trails to trunk sanitary sewers
Access trails to trunk sanitary sewers
38,500
26,500
- - - - --
Street light lu minary replaceme program
- - - - - --
Stre lig ht luminary replacem program
- - - - --
75,000
Well #3
Pull well #3
65,000
Well #7
Convert well #7 from diesel to gas
150,000
$ 7,949,339
The first two years of the CIP, 2010 and 2011, serve as a "work plan ". All
projects including those in 2010 and 2011 will be brought back to Council before
feasibility reports, acquisition, or construction begins.
Action Requested
Council is asked to approve the 2010 to 2014 Capital Improvement Plan and
adopt a resolution adopting an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan 2020 to
incorporate the CIP.
RESOLUTION NO. 2009-
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO
THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2020 TO INCORPORATE THE
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM (CIP)
WHEREAS, the City of Cottage Grove has prepared an amendment to the
Implementation Element of the City's amended Comprehensive Plan 2020 for
the Capital Improvements Program (CIP) 2010 -2014; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on November
23, 2009; and
WHEREAS, the public hearing was opened for public testimony and no
written or verbal testimony was received; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission unanimously found that the Capital
Improvements Plan 2010 -2014 is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan
2020.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of
Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, hereby approves the
amendment to the Implementation Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan
2020 to adopt the Capital Improvements Program (CIP) 2010 -2014.
Passed this 16th day of December 2009.
Myron Bailey, Mayor
Attest:
Caron M. Stransky, City Clerk
EXCERPT FROM UNAPPROVED MINUTES OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON NOVEMBER 23, 2009
6.2 Capital Improvement Program 2010 -2014 — Case CP09 -027
The City of Cottage Grove has applied for a comprehensive plan amendment to amend
the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for 2010 -2014.
Blin explained the CIP process and summarized some of the projects in the proposed CIP,
including in 2010, the 65th Street (CR/74) reconstruction, Pinecliff 2nd Addition streets and
utilities, reconstruction of River Acres Road including medians for a railroad quiet zone, and
in 2011, the reconstruction of the roads in Pine Coulee.
Thiede asked about the quiet zone for River Acres Road. Blin responded that the Federal
Railroad Administration changed the way they scored the crossing after they had initially
granted a quiet zone designation in that area. In order for the quiet zone designation to be
reinstated, medians need to be constructed, which would cost $30,000 to $40,000 added to
the total pavement management costs. Thiede asked if the railroad is responsible for the
crossing lights. Blin responded that the railroad owns and maintains the crossing lights.
Blin stated one key consideration for the plan is to keep capital expenditures and the
resulting debt levy at a relatively constant level. He summarized that the CIP is the work plan
for the next two years and includes all the upcoming projects and funding sources. The
action requested of the Planning Commission is to recommend to the Council that the CIP is
consistent with the comprehensive plan and to effectively amend the comprehensive plan to
include the CIP.
Messick opened the public hearing. No one spoke. Messick closed the public hearing.
Linse asked about the history of bonding for street construction and rehabilitation of existing
roads. Blin responded that it has been done for about 10 years. The City became aware that
its streets were deteriorating and did not have a program for reconstructing those roads. The
City set up the Infrastructure Management Task Force, which came forward with a set of
policies for assessing those costs. About three to four years ago, that group was reconvened
to look at those polices, and they made some fairly significant changes. He noted that
Thiede served on that task force. Prior to that, assessments were based on a valuation of
the home, essentially 2 percent of the value of the home as the premise is that a new street
increases the value of a home by 2 percent. The current policy is the city pays 55 percent
and property owners 45 percent. Linse asked about new roads. Blin stated that new roads
are effectively entirely paid by the developer or the person buying the house.
Messick stated, as a comment for the City Council, that he would like to see that number
flipped cc that homeowners are paying more of a share. Nobody wants to pay for the road in
front of their house but they also don't want to pay for the one across town. The residents
who get that new road are receiving the primary benefit of that road.
Excerpt from Unapproved Planning Commission Minutes
Capital Improvement Program 2010 -2014 — Case CP09 -027
November 23, 2009
Page 2 of 2
Hofiand made a motion to recommend approval. Thiede seconded. Motion passed on
an 8 -to -0 vote with one abstention (Line).
Linse explained that he abstained because he did not have time to go through the whole CIP
and there are too many items in there that he is unfamiliar with. Blin stated that next year a
workshop could be scheduled to discuss the capital improvement program. Thiede stated
that it is a little more difficult for people who have just gotten onto the Commission.