HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-08-11 PACKET 04.I.REQUEST OF CITY COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL AGENDA
MEETING ITEM #
DATE 08/11/10
n
PREPARED BY Engineering Jennifer Levitt
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT STAFF AUTHOR
COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST
Approve the plans and specifications and establish a September 9, 2010 bid date for the
Thompson Grove Estates Storm Sewer Rehabilitation.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Recommend the Council adopt the resolution approving the plans and specifications and
establishing a September 9, 2010 bid date for the Thompson Grove Estates Storm Sewer
Rehabilitation.
ADVISORY COMMISSION ACTION
❑ PLANNING
❑ PUBLIC SAFETY
❑ PUBLIC WORKS
❑ PARKS AND RECREATION
❑ HUMAN SERVICES /RIGHTS
❑ ECONOMIC DEV. AUTHORITY
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
DATE REVIEWED
APPROVED
DENIED
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
® MEMO /LETTER: Jennifer Levitt, August 5, 2010.
® RESOLUTION:
❑ ORDINANCE:
❑ ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION:
❑ LEGAL RECOMMENDATION:
❑ OTHER: Plans and Specifications.
ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS
j City Mministrator Fate
P
COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: APPROVED ❑ DENIED ❑ OTHER
RESOLUTION NO. 2010-
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND
ESTABLISHING A BID DATE FOR THE THOMPSON GROVE ESTATES
STORM SEWER REHABILITATION
WHEREAS, plans and specifications have been prepared in accordance
with the City standards and specifications for the Thompson Grove Estates
Storm Sewer Rehabilitation; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has presented such plans and
specifications to the City Council for approval.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, as follows
1. Sealed bids will be received in the office of the City Clerk until 10:00
a.m. on Thursday, September 9, 2010.
Passed this 11th day of August, 2010.
Myron Bailey, Mayor
Attest:
Caron M. Stransky, City Clerk
CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE
MINNESOTA
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Ryan Schroeder, City Administrator
From: Jennifer M. Levitt, P.E., City Engineer
Date: August 5, 2010
Re: Thompson Grove Estates Storm Sewer Rehabilitation
Approve Plans and Specifications
Establish Bid Date
Background:
Please see the enclosed memo dated June 30, 2010 for the background on the proposed
improvement.
Discussion:
Plans and Specifications
Plans and specifications have been prepared in accordance with the City standards and
specifications. The engineers estimate for the improvements is $285,000. Funding for this
project will be from the storm water area fund.
Bid Date
A September 9, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. bid date will provide ample time to provide required
notification to contractors.
Recommendation:
It is recommended the Council adopt the attached resolution approving the plans and
specification and establishing a September 9, 2010 bid date for the Thompson Grove Estates
Storm Sewer Rehabilitation project.
IIIIIW4� CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE
MINNESOTA
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Ryan Schroeder, City Administrator
From: Jennifer M. Levitt, P.E., City Engineer
Date: June 30, 2010
Re: 66" Deteriorated Pipe from Hefner to Hamlet Park Pond
Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specifications
Background
As a part of the original Thompson Grove Estates 15t Addition development, a 66" diameter
concrete storm sewer pipe was designed and constructed in 1960. It was identified as the
West Trunk Storm Sewer. It's currently located within the street right -of -way on Hefner
Avenue, extending west under East Point Douglas Road, Highway 61, West Point Douglas
Road, and along the north side of the Park and Ride parking lot, continuing further west under
the railroad tracks and discharging into the southerly portion of Hamlet Park Pond. From
West Point Douglas Rd to Hamlet Park Pond, it's located within a drainage and utility
easement. In addition, a 48" storm sewer pipe parallels the 66" pipe 10 feet to the south.
The 48" pipe provides storm sewer service to West Point Douglas Road and adjacent
properties. This pipe was designed and installed in 1974.
Recently, as part of their storm sewer inspection efforts, Public Works. identified a pipe
deterioration problem within the 66" concrete storm sewer pipe. City staff walked through the
pipe and took pictures of the deterioration, please see attached 66" Concrete Pipe
Deterioration Photos. Based on these inspections, it appears that the deterioration problem
exists from the 66" flared end section at Hamlet Park to approximately 1,000 feet upstream
(or between the north bound lane of Highway 61 and East Point Douglas Road). See the
attached record plan drawing.
There is a varied degree of pipe deterioration and it is inconsistent in location. The
deterioration ranges from the concrete pipe material appearing to be in an exposed aggregate
condition, to having the steel reinforcement exposed to a significant depth. At this time the
pipe has not deteriorated to the point in which there is no concrete pipe remaining, but it is
close.
There are several possible reasons for this deterioration: 50 years of normal wear and tear /use
of the pipe, possible quality control issues of the original manufacturing of the concrete pipe,
significant volumes and velocities of storm water running through this pipe over 50 years, the
abrasiveness of sediment carried through this pipe over the years, and possible exposure to
foreign materials /chemicals.
Discussion
Several options for the repair of the pipe deterioration have been evaluated and are listed
below with preliminary estimated costs:
Concrete Patching of Existing 66" Concrete Pipe
Estimated Construction Cost - $115,000, includes 5% contingencies
Total Project Costs - $149,500, includes 30% indirect costs
In this option estimates that 60% of the 1,000 feet of deteriorated pipe would require
concrete patching. An access point would be constructed by adding a storm sewer manhole
structure approximately 500 feet upstream from the 66" flared end section. This option should
be viewed as a short to intermediate term solution and would require regular monitoring.
Full Length CIPP Pipe Liner — Estimated Cost $550,000
Estimated Construction Cost - $550,000, includes 5% contingencies
Total Project Costs - $715,000, includes 30% indirect costs
This option includes a cast in place pipe liner for the entire 1,000 foot length of deteriorated
66" concrete pipe. This will require providing two access points to perform this work. Two
storm sewer manhole structures will be constructed permanently at both of the access points.
Prior to the lining of the pipe, the existing pipe will require a minimum level of concrete
patching to allow the CIPP to be successful. The existing 66" flared end would be removed
and replaced.
Open Cut Pipe Replacement in conjunction with a CIPP Liner
Estimated Construction Cost - $350,000, includes 5% contingencies
Total Project Costs - $455,000, includes 30% indirect costs
This option includes the installation of the CIPP liner within the 66" pipe that is under the
railroad, Highway 61, and West Point Douglas Road. The remaining 700 feet of 66" pipe
would be replaced in an open cut. Two storm sewer manhole structures would be
constructed permanently providing access to the pipe system.
PVC Liner
Estimated Construction Cost - $525,000, includes 5% contingencies
Total Project Costs - $682,500, includes 30% indirect costs
A fourth option reviewed was the installation of a PVC liner within the existing 66" concrete
pipe. The actual material cost of a PVC pipe large enough to be used within the existing pipe
(60'� is significant, and the reduction in the size of the pipe by inserting another pipe would
restrict flows and could create upstream drainage problems without further analysis of the
storm water model.
Staffs recommendation would be the third option, Open Cut Pipe Replacement in Conjunction
with a CIPP Liner, for the following reasons:
1. This option is cost - effective, only utilizing the more expensive lining rehabilitation method
on the portions of pipe in which surface disturbance is not desirable (railroad and street
crossings).
2. This pipe has had an effective service life of 50 years. Areas of pipe replacement would
restart the clock on the pipe's useful life.
3. The life expectancy of the concrete patching option is difficult to predict due to the
significant flows and velocities the pipe experiences, in addition to being challenging to
construct. It is an effective short term solution, however at a significant cost.
Financial Impact
This pipe replacement( repair does not appear in the current CIP and as such this project is an
unbudgeted expenditure. Due to the extensive deterioration and loss of structural integrity we
should proceed with a repair rather than wait for a complete structural failure.
The pipe is a part of the trunk storm sewer system and services large sub - watershed district.
As the pipe serves an area -wide benefit and has met its life expectancy, funding for this project
would come from the storm water area fund. No specific policy addresses this situation or
prevents the use of area funds for a project of this nature and sufficient funding exists in the
storm water area fund to support this expense.
Recommendation
It is recommended the Council authorize preparation of plans and specifications for the repair
of the deteriorated 66" Concrete Pipe from Hefner Avenue to Hamlet Park Pond as outlined in
Option #3.
/*
IN I
i II �"
� � -T
-
--t-
rl
I�
`__
I
II
1 j
i ii
I v [ MOUV 8e 1N n3nn3S WaDIS SLViS2 3AON'J NOSdwOHI a F
Ui € o
„d l VlOS9NNIW'3AOaD 30V-LL0D dO AiM
7((DL Z owwwwa W In
O U) O
W f E E > w u¢
f� z z z z " r m
( 1 F-- n 0 0 0 00 o u a
U) _j 00 0
W H a ! vw'�� °w u 0
m s
w =sal G
>
° O w F
N �p
° tY�v 0 v
° c C7 cr-, 0
� ' n N�o0oo 1
V U 5 Z W
® 0..
U) V
O_
LL °� U F U U w C Z
O 0��a �zm�
H E a f n K U U
6 k�S
i
Y Jai
�Ir r M
— j �
r
y
o „
t r w y
3 a r r r
r
I A a
s
x
iE3 -d
g �
�J� a
'r z S T €x —�— rN �3rvs arvs�3i o � .N
f a d g e rmm NOUVtl 1B 1H 83M3S WNO1S S31V1S3 IAO89 NOSdWOHI £ t 4 0
a j VIOS3NNIW'3AOI9 19V1L09 dO A I D s'
s
nl1 s _ '�
G
�x
qy ^py y 3 3 ffi
O Y g 1 1 i ( P 1 l I J µI
n
f _
II I
a azo € €� €a sad ss � 35w
V �
C �
G
3 E E NMtl NO11tlJOl e
w O - NOUVID[ ]t 8WIS MO1S 531VIS3 3AO8O NOSdWOHl _
P O
V10S;NNIW '3AOdD 30VJ100 d0 kUD �� `s 5 _ � U
�e$s
p c
g
IN N
Ix
t w
�-
� a c 5€
r
�
/ S
r
e ? °= srcr3a a B
S �
=3 - - --- -- NOUVtl 19tl A3 a3M3S WNOiS S31V1 A 3AOt O NOSdWOHl b
VlOSDNNIW '3AO'dD DEWL]L00 dO AiD
9 gin
x
5a
CID - --------------
R � P
4 j ` 5
M ll
4
m Y i
A
P s e: e:
Alp
I S g g g gE } FF s 5��4 l a P ry1
p F H£l�
;9,q v £
l
.)
P i z = e sz &o zeaE' SS E`. k.
s E n r
asp
e
e-
zl ee "i W c.
oe
a,
e8 f
0