HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-09-15 PACKET 04.C.REQUEST OF CITY COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL AGENDA
MEETING ITEM #
DATE 09/15/10
PREPARED BY Finance Robin Roland
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT STAFF AUTHOR
COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST
Adopt resolutions declaring costs and calling for the public hearings on the Lehigh and Trunk
Highway 95 street assessment project
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending that the Council adopt the resolution declaring the costs and ordering
the preparation of the assessment roll for the Lehigh and Trunk Highway 95 street assessment
project, and then adopt the resolution calling for the hearing on the proposed assessment.
BUDGET IMPLICATION $
BUDGETED AMOUNT
ADVISORY COMMISSION ACTION
❑ PLANNING
❑ PUBLIC SAFETY
❑ PUBLIC WORKS
❑ PARKS AND RECREATION
❑ HUMAN SERVICES /RIGHTS
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
® MEMO /LETTER:
® RESOLUTION:
DATE
ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS
W 21Z 9 10 bo
City Administrator Date
COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: APPROVED ❑ DENIED ❑ OTHER
ACTUAL AMOUNT FUNDING SOURCE
REVIEWED
APPROVED
DENIED
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS
W 21Z 9 10 bo
City Administrator Date
COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: APPROVED ❑ DENIED ❑ OTHER
From: Jennifer M. Levitt, P.E., City Engineer
Robin Roland, Finance Director
Brenda Peper, Financial Analyst
Date: September 10, 2010
Re: Lehigh and TH95 Project:
Declare Costs for the Project
Call for a Public Hearing on October 6, 2010
Backaround:
This area had been a concern to area residents and the City for a number of years.
Specifically, the Lehigh and Trunk Highway 95 intersection had been a safety concern for
some time with the skewed angle. An analysis of the MnDOT crash data of accidents occurring
in close proximity to the intersection revealed nine accidents took place between 2002 and
2005. In each of these accidents, roadway design appeared to be a contributing factor.
According to the crash report, all of these accidents occurred within 1/4 —mile of the
intersection, and the crashes were all sideswipes, rear -end collisions, and vehicles running off
the road to avoid slowing or stopping vehicles preparing to turn.
In addition to the safety concerns, there was also poor drainage north of the intersection.
Residents had made numerous complaints regarding the drainage in this area. Each spring a
large section of Lehigh Road had water standing on it and many areas experienced washouts.
These washouts have had temporary measures utilized each year to stabilize the road until an
ultimate solution could be implemented. The ultimate solution was to create a ditch section
along Lehigh Road to contain the water and add additional culverts to control drainage to
existing drainage and utility easements.
A History of City Actions on this project are as follows:
The City Council authorized staff to submit an application to the MnDOT's 2008 Municipal
Agreement Program on October 4, 2006 for the TH95 and Lehigh Road improvements. Then
on February 27, 2007, the City was notified that $135,041 had been offered for the
improvement project. Council then authorized acceptance of the FY2008 Municipal
Agreement Program Funding on March 21, 2007. In September 2007, WSB was selected to
provide the engineering design services for the project. The City continued to negotiate for
additional funds for the project due to additional requirements placed on the design of the
bypass lane, turn lane and road re- alignment. Then on February 8, 2008, the City was notified
that additional funds valued at $210,000 could be utilized for a reduced scope to eliminate the
bypass lane and keep the turn lane and Lehigh re- alignment. Council approved the feasibility
report on April 16, 2008 and called for a Public Improvement Hearing to be held on May 21,
2008.
Public Hearing
At the May 21, 2008 Public Hearing the City Council ordered the improvements to Lehigh
Road and TH 95 intersection (Schedule A in the feasibility report) and a portion of the drainage
improvements (Schedule D in the feasibility report) with a 4 -0 (Sandy Shiely was absent).
The project ordered selected was to construct only the TH 95 and Lehigh realignment portion
and not do anything else on Lehigh. This would mean the City would be able to utilize the
Cooperative Agreement money from the MnDOT and would have less assessments related to
the project. The funding for the project would be the $210,000 in Cooperative Agreement
Dollars, assessments, Stormwater Utility and State Aid funds.
In the discussions at the Public Hearing, Council indicated they did not want to assess the two
parcels for stormwater related activities. Council proposed a cap of $5,513.00($3,095.45
streets and $2,418 storm) for parcels 44.0001 and 44.0007 for an equitable road assessment
even though the more extensive Lehigh Road improvement was not ordered. Council further
directed that the stormwater drainage assessment not be assessed so an assessment of
$3,095.45 is proposed.
The cost benefit appraisal dated 12/31/2007 for the assessments on the two parcels being
assessed came back at $10,000 (25.027.21.44.0001) and $8,000 (25.3027.21.44.0007)
Following is a recap of the constructions costs incurred:
Estimated final
Assessed %
MnDOT
MSA State
Storm Water MSA Fund
cost
Amount Assessed
Funding
Aid
utility Balance
Contractor and other costs $ 420,121
$ 6,191 1.5%
210,000
$
110,449
$ 37,505 $ 55,976
ROW /Easement 11,606
0.0%
$
11,606
431,727
6,191 1.4%
210,000
122,055
37,505 55,976
Parcels Assessed
Assessment Amount Per parcel 3,095.45
Recommendation:
It is recommended the Council adopt the attached resolution declaring the costs to be
assessed and calling for a public hearing to be held on October 6, 2010.
RESOLUTION NO. 10-
RESOLUTION CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON
THE LEHIGH AND TRUNK HIGHWAY 95 ROAD PROJECT
WHEREAS, by Resolution 10- , passed by the City Council on
September 15, 2010, the Council directed the Finance Director to prepare the
proposed assessment roll for the Lehigh and Trunk Highway 95 Project and
WHEREAS, the City Clerk has notified the Council that such assessment
roll is complete and filed in her office for public inspection.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of
Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, as follows:
1. A hearing shall be held on the 6th day of October 2010 at 7:30
p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessment roll.
2. The Finance Director is hereby directed to cause a Notice of
Hearing on the proposed assessments to be published in the
Washington County Bulletin, the official newspaper of the City,
at least two (2) weeks prior to the hearing and shall state in the
notice the total cost of the improvement and the proposed
interest rate of 7 %. The Finance Director shall cause mailed
notices to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the
assessment roll
Passed this 15th day of September 2010
Myron Bailey, Mayor
Attest:
Caron Stransky, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 10-
RESOLUTION DECLARING COSTS TO BE ASSESSED AND
ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR
THE LEHIGH AND TRUNK HIGHWAY 95 ROAD PROJECT
WHEREAS, contracts were let for the Lehigh and Trunk Highway 95
Project and the contract price for such improvements was $265,141, with
expenses incurred in the construction of improvements and other construction
amounting to $166,586.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of
Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, as follows:
1. The net cost of such improvements to be assessed is declared
to be $6,190.90
2. The Finance Director, with the assistance of the City will
calculate the proper amount to be assessed for such
improvements against every assessable lot or piece of parcel or
land within the district affected without regard to cash valuation
as provided by law, and shall file a copy of proposed
assessment roll in the City Clerk's office for public inspection
3. The City Clerk shall, upon completion of such assessment roll,
notify the City Council therefor
Passed this 15 day of September, 2010.
Myron Bailey, Mayor
Attest:
Stransky, City Clerk
9
d
w
a
41
N
d
d
a
�
m
—
a
a
N
a
A
O
M
t0
t0
O
d
V
0)
Q E
C)
M
t0
V3
Vi
y
a
O
0
N
a
m
m
m
m
�
N
H
a
�
N
Q �
a
m
o
>
m L
G
m
L
T
L
y
a
d
i
J
J
d
h
O
3
m
m
O
o
0
o
0
R
9
�
O
>
O
J
�
L
m
L
O1
d
L
L
p
d
J
d
J
r
o
0
0
0
F
T
a
�
@
O
�
Z
m
@
L
C
3
N
m
�
N_
C
L
�
a
F
r
0
0
0
0
0
0
v
v
Z
?
v
a
N
N
r
r
N
N
O
O
N
N
m
N
X
m
I
d
m
a