HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-03-11 MINUTESPUBLIC SAFETY, HEALTH AND WELFARE COMMISSION
MINUTES OF MEETING
March 11, 2003
PUBLIC HEARING
Local Law Enforcement Community Block Grant
A public hearing was held in regards to the application for the Local Law Enforcement
Block Grant (LLEBG) distributed by the Bureau of Criminal Justice. The grant was
requested in the amount of $10,880.00. There were no comments from the public
regarding the application for the use of the funds from the grant. The Public Safety,
Health and Welfare Commission, which is an advisory commission to the Council, did
have questions regarding the intended use for the funds that would assist in the
Neighborhood Watch program in the city of Cottage Grove. That was the extent of the
concerns and/or comments from the public and the Public Safety, Health and Welfare
Commission.
REGULAR MEETING
Pursuant to due notice, a meeting of the Public Safety, Health and Welfare Commission was
held at the City Hall Administrative Conference Room.
CALL TO ORDER:
MEMBERS PRESENT:
MEMBERS ABSENT
STAFFPRESENT:
The March 11, 2003 meeting of the Cottage Grove Public Safety,
Health and Welfare Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m.
Kyle Lindquist, Karla Bigham, Bill Schmidt, Jennifer Osborne
Bruce Gengnagel
Captain Craig Woolery, Deputy Fire Chief Dennis Leonard, City
Engineer Nancy Hanzlik, Council Person Cheryl Kohls
Approval of minutes:
Chairperson Karla Bigham presented the February 11, 2003 minutes for review. On a motion
by Bill Schmidt, seconded by Kyle Lindquist, the minutes were approved with the
amendments to be made. Motion carried.
Approval of agenda:
Chairperson Karla Bigham presented the March 11, 2003 agenda of the Public Safety, Health
and Welfare Commission for review. On a motion by Kyle Lindquist, seconded by Jennifer
Osborne, the March 11, 2003 agenda was accepted and approved by the Commission.
Motion carried.
OPENFORUM
Chairperson Bigham invited citizens present to address the Commission regarding any
matters that were not on the approved agenda.
Page 2
PSHWC Meeting Minutes
March 11, 2003
There being no presentations, Chairperson Bigham closed the Open Forum segment of the
meeting.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
- Response to Subway Comments from the February 11' meeting — Memo from Community
Development Director Kim Lindquist
Captain Woolery advised the Commission that he sent a letter to Planning regarding the
number of parking spaces for that section and access to and from. The Commission felt she
addressed the issue very well. There were no further comments from the Commission
regarding this issue.
- Planning Commission agenda for March 24, 2003
The Commission was provided a copy of the Planning Commission's agenda for the March
24, 2003 meeting.
Captain Woolery provided the Commission with information regarding the new Veterinary
Clinic advising them the move into the Clinic will happen by the end of this month.
He also advised them of the new sign ordinance proposal and policy which is being presented
to the Commission tonight and had gone before the Public Works Commission.
There being no further discussion regarding the Planning Commission's agenda, this portion
of the meeting was closed.
OLD BUSINESS
None at this time.
NEW BUSINESS
Case 03-03-01 Stop Sign request on Jorgensen Avenue, 82n Street and 84`
Street — Lynn Dagenaar, 9759 84` Street South, 459-9891
Captain Woolery advised the Commission that this request has been addressed
for the past year. This is a 3 way intersection and the resident was invited to
attend tonighYs meeting if she wished, and explained to her that the request at
that time, did not meet the State warrants required to place a stop sign at this
location. Ms. Dagenaar was comfortable with this information.
Commission member Kyle Lindquist talked with the COP Team leader Sergeant
Wilson and has observed this location by driving the location on several
occasions. There are no view obstructions and agrees that there is nothing to
warrant the placement of stop signs in the area.
Page 3
PSHWC Meeting Minutes
March 11, 2003
After general discussion, on a motion by Commission member Kyle Lindquist,
seconded by Commission member Bill Schmidt, to deny the request for the placement
of a Stop Sign on Jorgensen Avenue, 82nd Street and 84�h Street. Motion carried.
Case 03-03-02 Signage in the vicinity of Cottage Grove Elementary School — Tracy
Klika, 8755 76` Street Court South, 459-4870
The Commission was provided a letter with pictures from Ms. Klika of the area.
She was contacted and invited to attend tonighYs meeting. Captain Woolery
reminded the Commission that this was addressed about 2 months ago when the
Washington County Engineers attended the meeting. He went on to state that he
contacted Mr. Wayne Sandberg, Transportation Engineer of Washington County
and was copied the letter from Ms. Klika. He asked Mr. Sandberg to respond
with a letter that is included in the Commission's packet. The County has made
improvements to the area in question as far a reflecting and visibility of signs.
Ms. Klika stated to Captain Woolery that she understand and was satisfied with
the improvements included the Engir�eer's letter.
Nancy Hanzlik, Cottage Grove City Engineer, advised the Commission that she
is recommending to the City Council to authorize Washington County to perform
a speed study on that stretch of 65' Street.
On a motion by Jennifer Osborne, seconded by Bill Schmidt, the Commission
recommended to accept the letter from the Washington County Engineer's office.
Motion carried.
Case 03-03-03 City Sign Policy Review
Commission chair Bigham commented on how thorough the policy was and it
answered a lot of questions.
Captain Woolery requested that City Engineer Nancy Hanzlik to comment on the
policy and explain its contents to the Commission. Ms. Hanzlik advised the
Commission that research was done on many cities' sign policies and
interviewed several other entities to come up with the policy provided. She went
on to state that it does allow a citizen to present a request to anybody and all
that is needed is that person needs to fill out the "Request Form", turn it into the
Engineering Department and the Engineering Department is then responsible for
processing it. Then it gets processed into one of six categories that is set up in
the policy and then return a letter or call the requestor with their comments as to
whether the sign will be installed or not installed within the city. If the sign is not
installed in the city, the requestor then has a right to appear before the Public
Works Commission and appeal their case. At that point the Engineer or their
Page 4
PSHWC Meeting Minutes
March 11. 2003
representative and the party will go before the commission and present their
case. If the Commission agrees with the Engineer that the sign should not be
installed at that point, the citizen is allowed in order to go forward to present their
case to the City Council during the Open Forum portion of the meeting. At that
point, the requestor would have to start paying for Engineering services or any
other city services because they already have presented their case to the
Engineer as well as to a Commission and could incur expenses if the Council
warrants. If the Public Works Commission does not agree with the Engineer at
the staff level, the dispute will be presented before the City Council who will have
final say. At that point, I don't believe the requestor is going to be billed for any
services whether the sign is installed or not. The City Council does have the final
say on the sign installation policy.
She went on to say that she presented it to the Public Works Commission last
evening, they had the following comments they wanted to add in the Procedure
for Sign Installation section, that before removing any signs, they wanted an
article published in the Bulletin. In particular this refers to the Not Permitted
Signs sections, ie Slow Children, there are approximately 55 signs now currently
installed in the city which will be removed once the Sign Policy goes into effect.
They were concerned about the fact that public reaction would be pretty strong
and they would prefer to have some type of notice published in the Bulletin prior
to removing any signs. They were also concerned on how the city was going to
contact the original requestor. If it is after 12 years, the city will go back to the
original address of the person who made the original request. If they are still
living there, the city will talk to them, if not, the city will cease attempts.
Commission Chair Bigham asked why the city is removing signs. Ms. Hanzlik
advised her that after 12 years, the reflective life of a sign usually deteriorates
based upon the different grades of sign materials used. It varies between 6 and
15 years. The City picked 12 years as a periodic inspection and replacement
date. Also 12 years also gives enough time for any type of situation to change.
Commission member Jennifer Osborne asked if they did any studies as to how
effective these signs are? Do people really slow down when they see a Deaf
Child sign? Ms. Hanzlik stated that no and that is why they should be removed
and there has been numerous studies.
Ms. Hanzlik went on to say that the Public Works Commission also suggested
that someone should write a view point letter to the Bulletin once this sign policy
is approved by Council to try to explain to citizens why it is occurring, the effect
of sign pollution and how signs lose their effectiveness. It would be more
beneficial to have someone other than City staff send the letter who could come
Page 5
PSHWC Meeting Minutes
March 11. 2003
at it from a different angle.
On a motion by Commission member Jennifer Osborne, seconded by
Commission member Kyle Lindquist, the Commission recommended the City of
Cottage Grove Sign Policy be approved by the City Council. Motion carried.
Case 03-03-04 Multiple Animal Licenses Review
City Clerk Caron Stransky provided the Commission with one application for a
multiple animal license. Also letters from neighbors were included for the
Commission's review.
Commission member Osborne commented that the applicant has had multiple
complaints against the animals regarding their barking.
Commission member Bill Schmidt inquired if the application was not approved
what would happen. Captain Woolery stated that they could be cited for not
having a license, they don't fall under the category for single animal license nor
would they fall under the specs for a kennel operation based on where they live.
It would eventually be left to the discretion of the owner of how they want to have
their dogs. They will need to make choices on what animal they would need to
remove.
Gary Kjellberg approached the Commission and introduced himself as a citizen
who served on the City's Nuisance Ordinance Committee. He advised the
Commission that this ordinance went into effect after the fact that these people
had their animals and they were in conformance prior to the new ordinance being
approved. By denying the application, they will need to get rid of some of their
animals. He would like to give the applicant some time to improve and turn
things around and if they don't comply, then bring it back for consideration.
Captain Woolery advised the Commission that in two years there have been two
complaints — one was at large, no license and the other was for dog barking.
After discussion, on a motion by Jennifer Osborne, seconded by Kyle Lindquist,
recommended to deny the Brady application for a multiple animal license with Bill
Schmidt opposing the denial. Motion carried.
RESPONSE TO PREVIOUSLY RAISED COMMISSION COMMENTS AND
REQUESTS
1) Response memo from COP Team — traffic concerns exiting the ice arena at 8p`
Street
Page 6
PSHWC Meeting Minutes
March 11. 2003
Captain Woolery advised that the COP team recommended that the trees and
shrubs be trimmed to allow for better visibility when exiting the lot onto gp`
Street.
2) Response memo from COP Team — passing on right shoulder area of 90' and
County Road 19 (Keats Avenue)
Captain Woolery advised that a recommendation to re-stripe the roadway to
allow a passing lane like other intersections along County 19.
3) Visual interference — southbound Hwy 61 exit ramp to Innovation Blvd.
Captain Woolery advised that MN DOT will cut down the tree.
COMMISSION COMMENTS AND REQUESTS
1) Commission Chair Karla Bigham informed the Commission that interviews will be held
next week with 5 applicants for the two vacancies on the Public Safety Commission.
Those on the interview panel will consist of herself, Vice Chairperson Bruce Gegnagel
and Council Person Cheryl Kohis.
She went on to advise the Commission that if there is any contact information that
needs to be updated, to give information to Captain Woolery.
STAFF REPORTS
POLICE - Captain Woolery informed the Commission the call load has kept us busy.
School Resource Officer Mary McGuire at the Senior High, has cleared a
case where the fire hydrants were opened. Charges are pending.
He also advised that there will be two officers who will be retiring in the next
couple of months. We are waiting on word regarding the budget for hiring
ability.
FIRE - Deputy Fire Chief Leonard advised the Part Time Fire Fighter class is fnishing
up and five individuals will be coming onboard from that class. A second class
from three weeks ago has provided three individuals who will be staffed when
that class is over, probably by the end of May, which will give a compliment of
55 fire fighters. A full time EMS/Coordinator Fire Fighter/Paramedic has
completed the hiring process and he should be on board within a couple of
weeks.
The Fire Division is awaiting Council approval on specs for a new 75 foot ladder
truck which should be the next Council meeting and have the new ladder by
June or July.
Page 7
PSHWC Meeting Minutes
March 11. 2003
We put in place the automatic mutual aid call out system in Dispatch for non-
hydrogen areas within the city, �vith St. Paul Park and Hastings, which will help
improve our ISO rating.
He went on advised the Commission that he and Fire Fighter/EMT Donna
Honeyman attended a one week class at the Emergency Management Institute
on designing Emergency Preparedness Exercises. We plan on using the
knowledge and materials in planning the spring exercise and next fall. He also
applied for a training grant and a planning grant. He received the planning grant
this date. He wanted to thank Donna Honeyman for attending the course.
COUNCIL- Council Person Kohls advised the Commission that the Mississippi Dunes
Estates development at 100` and Hadley was Council approved.
Councilperson Kohls also advised the Commission that all City Commissions'
agendas and minutes will now be on the City web page. This will go into effect
as soon as money is available to purchase the program.
Councilperson Kohls informed the Commission that the City Council requested
the Public Safety Commission to review the snowmobile ordinance. Mr. Gene
Smallidge has requested to the City Council that all snowmobiling in the city be
banned. Captain Woolery stated he would be putting this item on the
Commission's April 8'h agenda to revisit the entire ordinance and what
parameters the Commission wants to see for snowmobiling in the city, whether
it being a citizen task force and have a public hearing to get input from both
sides of the issue. Councilperson Kohls requested that the snowmobile map
and ordinance be provided to the Commission.
Councilperson Kohls also advised the Commission of the intent to start the
Hinton/Tower bidding project in a couple months to start construction.
ADJOURN
Motion by Bill Schmidt, seconded by Jennifer Osborne to adjourn the meeting at 8:03 p.m.
Motion carried.
Respectfully submitted,
Cyndee Engfer—Administrative Secretary