Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011-09-13 PACKET 10.City of Cotta Grove Minnesota To: Economic Development Authority From: Ryan R. Schroeder, City Administrator Date: August 30, 2011 Subject: Office Incubator Update At the June 14, 2011 meeting of the EDA staff brought forward a proposal from the Genesis Business Centers, Ltd to conduct a preliminary feasibility study toward a goal of creation of a Business Incubator from the current City Hall at 7516 80 Street. EDA staff had initiated a meeting with Genesis and had requested the proposal. The EDA requested additional clarity and outcomes in response to the proposal. At the July 12, 2011 meeting staff informed the EDA of an effort to meet with additional authorities in the field ahead of further consideration of the proposal from Genesis. On July 8 staff had -met with representatives from University Enterprise Laboratories which is a St. Paul based bioscience incubator. We are anticipating some level of response from UEL prior to the next meeting of the EDA. We have needed to reschedule with University Technology Enterprise Center which is located in Dinkytown. At this point we have a September 8 meeting with the Property Manager for that facility. According to County tax records this building has a value of $2,878,700. If rented that value would incur a tax liability of approximately $85,000 (about $23,000 of which would accrue to the City/ tax bill would accrue in second year of operation). The current electric /gas estimate for a fully occupied building would be $37,000. The water /sewer /street light/storm sewer bill for this building could be estimated at about $5,000 /year. Janitorial should be budgeted at $23,000. That all totals $150,000 or $6.21 /gross square foot ($5.26 excepting the City tax bill) plus costs to maintain the landscaping /parking lot as well as maintenance, repair and replacement. What that seems to suggest is perhaps a $7 or $8 /gross square foot in CAM's (to break even) plus any profit, marketing, management, and vacancy costs (plus additional for any extras such as IT, office support services and the like). Market comparisons to the above include: 1. 8750 90 Street: $9.50 plus $5.50/ $15 2. Hillside Center (across the Street): $10 plus $8.60/ $18.60 3. 7420 Hardwood (Shoppes): $16 plus $7.98/ $23.98 4. Oak Park Commons $20 including CAM's Given the above, it would seem we could create a product at a below market lease rate for business start up's if the EDA /Council believes that the expenditure of effort and potential risk of vacancies, lack of rent payment, maintenance expenses beyond budget and the like are worth the potential upside of growing businesses. It should be mentioned that owners of competing office space may see a potential venture as unfair competition. While this is valid it also seems that our potential tenants may not be as bankable as would tenants attracted to competitive office locations. An alternative to the above use would be to place the property on the market for resale. According to the County the property is valued at $5 /square foot ($693,600) while the building is valued at $90 /square foot ($2,185,100). There are not any recent comps in this market. From a cash flow perspective assuming market rents at $10 and $4 for garage space assuming a 10% vacancy and an 11 % cap rate the building on the land could value at $1.7 million. Within the marketplace this might be perceived as a distressed sale meaning it should not be surprising to receive offers in the $1.2 million range. Additional options would include offering the building as a straight lease or a land lease. At this point we continue to look for additional feedback from property management professionals and will bring any we receive to the Board meeting. Board Action: Based on Discussion