Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-02-01 PACKET 04.C.REQUEST OF CITY COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL AGENDA MEETING ITEM # DATE 2/1/12 PREPARED BY Finance Robin Roland ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT HEAD COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST Recap of cost savings due to electronic packets /iPad usage STAFF RECOMMENDATION Information only BUDGET IMPLICATION N/A BUDGETED AMOUNT ADVISORY COMMISSION ACTION DENIED DATE REVIEWED ❑ PLANNING ❑ ❑ PUBLIC SAFETY ❑ ❑ PUBLIC WORKS ❑ ❑ PARKS AND RECREATION ❑ ❑ HUMAN SERVICES /RIGHTS ❑ ECONOMIC DEV. AUTHORITY ❑❑ SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ® MEMO /LETTER: Roland 1/27112 ❑ RESOLUTION: ❑ ORDINANCE: ❑ ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION: ❑ LEGAL RECOMMENDATION: ❑ OTHER: ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS City N/A ACTUAL AMOUNT APPROVED DENIED ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ r Datc COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: ❑ APPROVED ❑ DENIED H: \Council items \City Council Action Form.doc City of • , ,• - Grove Finance Department TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Ryan Schroeder, City Administrator FROM: Robin Roland, Finance Director DATE: January 27, 2012 SUBJECT: Cost savings due to use of electronic packets /iPads # Introduction At the January 18, 2012 meeting, Council requested a recap of cost savings due to the use of iPads (electronic packets versus paper packets). Discussion When we use the phrase "cost savings ", in reality we are talking about two components: actual physical cost savings (less paper, less cost of copying) and opportunity cost savings (staff time spent). This memo addresses both components. We have been using the electronic method of packet delivery /review at Council meetings since April 20, 2011. Prior to that date, there were 18 copies of the agenda packet and supporting materials prepared. Since April 20 th , there is one electronic copy which is sent out to as many people as request it and two paper copies made. The chart below shows a comparison of the difference if we were still processing all as paper copies. Material Costs 4/20/2011 thru 12/21 /2011. Packets. Material Costs Paper -linty Packet Scenario ' (18 Paper Copies) Current Scenario Electronic /Paper (2 Paper Copies) Item rCost per Unit Pages /impressions 'Subtotal Pages /Impressions >Subtotal Paper Cost per Page 0.00720 46,296 ! 333.33 5,144 37.04 Copier Click Charge Per Impression 0.00485 82,459 39992 -' 9,162 44.44 Postage for Mailed Copy (Attorney) $5.00 /Packet 100.00 - Total Material Cost 83325 81.47 Savings with Current Scenario 751.78 The opportunity cost is where we believe the largest "savings" has occurred. Under the paper packet scenario, staff spent an estimated six hours of preparation time in copying and collating 18 packets for each meeting. These packets were then delivered by CSO's, taking roughly an hour and a half of staff time per meeting. An additional hour after each meeting was necessary to file /upload the packet into the Laserfiche system. With electronic packets, staff preparation time has dropped to three hours each "Agenda day" and the delivery time and post meeting packet filing time have been eliminated. We conservatively estimate that from April to Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Ryan Schroeder Page 2 of 2 December 2011 this equates to $3,068 in salary and benefits which were able to be devoted to other job responsibilities. Requested Action This is for Council's information only. My thanks to Neil Belscamper for his compilation of all the data used for this analysis.