HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-04-18 PACKET 08.B.REQUEST OF CITY COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL AGENDA
MEETING ITEM #
DATE 4/18/12 r
PREPARED BY Finance Robin Roland
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT HEAD
COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST
Consider proposal to update the East Ravine Major Roadway Special Assessment Study.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Approve the proposed update to the 2006 East Ravine Major Roadway Special Assessment
Study by Stantec at a cost of $12,800.
BUDGET IMPLICATION —D 1 0 0 0
BUDGETED AMOUNT ACTUAL AMOUNT
ADVISORY COMMISSION ACTION
❑ PLANNING
❑ PUBLIC SAFETY
❑ PUBLIC WORKS
❑ PARKS AND RECREATION
❑ HUMAN SERVICES /RIGHTS
❑ ECONOMIC DEV. AUTHORITY
DATE
REVIEWED
APPROVED
DENIED
❑ ❑
❑
❑ ❑
❑
❑ ❑
❑
❑ ❑
❑
❑ ❑
❑
❑ ❑
❑
❑ ❑
❑
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
® MEMO /LETTER: Roland 4/13/12
❑ RESOLUTION:
❑ ORDINANCE:
❑ ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION:
❑ LEGAL RECOMMENDATION:
® OTHER: 2006 Major Road Study. Stantec/Sanocki letter.
i
ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS
ityAdministrator Date
COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: ❑ APPROVED ❑ DENIED ❑ OTHER
H: \Council items \City Council Action Form.doc
City of Cottage Grove Memo
Finance Department
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Ryan Schroeder, City Administrator
FROM: Robin Roland, Finance & Community Development Director `
DATE: April 13, 2012
SUBJECT: Consider proposal to update the East Ravine Major Roadway Special
Assessment Study
Introduction
Staff's proposal to update the East Ravine Major Roadway Special Assessment Study was
tabled at the March 21 meeting and more information was requested for Council's
consideration.
Discussion
Staff has heard from East Ravine landowners that "the City" is not doing enough to assist them
in the sale of their property to developers so that development in the area can progress. Staff
has heard from developers that our development fees are too high and make the cost of
development in the area untenable.
The City has already responded with a willingness to be flexible about lot sizing, a reduction in
park dedication fees, a reduction in required road widths and a coordination of storm
water /park development with the SWWD. The last remaining item is to assure that our area
charges are appropriate.
Attached with this item is a copy of the 2006 East Ravine Major Roadway Special Assessment
Study which was prepared by Bonestroo. This study identified the costs of the road
improvements anticipated with the (then) imminent development of the area. The City Council
accepted the report in September 2006 and subsequently has included fees and charges in
the subdivision ordinance which reflect the recommendations from the report.
In the six years since the Bonestroo report was produced, several new realities have taken
hold, not the least of which is a significant reduction in land valuations. Land valuations were a
major assumption in the 2006 Bonestroo report. As such, staff believes that the report should
be updated to reflect the current land valuations.
Additionally, several other items which impact the report's conclusions have changed. They
are as follows:
• Washington County's cost participation was not finalized at the time of the original
report. We now have a more accurate assessment of this participation.
Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Ryan Schroeder
Page 2 of 2
• The preliminary design of the SWWD land and stormwater basin was not completed in
2006. We now have detailed grading plans for the area in question.
• Preliminary design of the Parkway between Jamaica and CSAH 19 is completed
including a diverging one way road section which was added for increased aesthetic
appeal. This is a significant cost change.
• Landscaping assumptions in the original plan were general in nature and are now more
detailed and easier to evaluate for cost.
• Jamaica Avenue from Military to 70 Street preliminary layout (and cost estimating) has
been completed.
The City is committed to doing everything within its control to advance the East Ravine
development plan. We may not be able to control the cost of the land being marketed to
developers; we can make sure our development fees are appropriate and competitive. An
update to the study would identify if our fees are currently "too high" and require adjustment or
if they are appropriate and defensible to developer challenges.
Attached with this memo is a letter from Dave Sanocki of Stantec (formerly Bonestroo) which
outlines the scope of service and the cost for the update. Funding for the $12,800 cost is
available from the Future Projects Capital Project fund, but could be recovered from future
infrastructure projects.
Requested Action
Approve the proposed update to the 2006 East Ravine Major Roadway Special Assessment
Study by Stantec at a cost of $12,800.
Stant@C
March 2, 2012
Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
2335 Highway 36 West
St. Paul MN 55113
Tel: (651) 636 -4600
Fax: (651) 636 -1311
mot' Bonestroo
Jennifer Levitt
City of Cottage Grove
8635 West Point Douglas Road South
Cottage Grove, MN 55016 -3318
Re: East Ravine/Neighborhood 1 Study (Cost Estimate to Update 2006 Report)
Dear Jennifer:
Pursuant to our February 17, 2012 meeting to discuss the East Ravine Parkway /Neighborhood 1 study area,
we are providing you a cost estimate to update the 2006 East Ravine Study Area. The 2006 report contained
many assumptions that are now more clearly defined.
The following information would be included in the 2012 report:
• The 2006 report included the area of Ravine Parkway from 65th Street South to Keats Avenue, The
report will update the costs of Ravine Parkway from Jamaica Avenue to Keats Avenue (Co. Rd. 19).
• The 2006 report estimated the County's participation at approximately 55% which included right -of-
way costs. The current County cost participation policy will be applied in this report.
• The figures will be updated and additional information (road alignment, landscaping, ponding, etc.)
will be included for Ravine Parkway.
• The 2006 report includes traffic data from 2005. The traffic data will be updated to include current
information.
• Property owner information will be updated.
• The cost estimates will be revised to reflect 2012 construction costs.
• Funding opportunities will be reviewed and presented as applicable as part of the 2012 report update.
• In the 2006 report, similar per foot costs were used for all street segments, utilities, landscaping and
lighting. At this time, the scope of the proposed improvements are now clearly defined. The updated
cost estimates will reflect the refined scope for each of these items.
It is estimated that the costs associated at updating the 2006 East Ravine report will be approximately
$12,600 (see attached).
I you have any questions related to this cost estimate feel free to call me at 651 - 604 -4905.
Sincerely
Dave Sanocki, P.E.
Estimated Costs
Totals 107 $ 12,784.00
Hours
Rate
Total
Craig Larson
10
135.80
1,350.00
Dave Sanocki
24
125.40
2,500.00
Brad Schleeter storm & ondin
30
115.00
3,450.00
Aaron Mueller electrical
16
126.00
2 016.40
Stuart Krahn (landscape)
4
145.04
580.00
Scott Israelson traffic
14
140.00
1 400.00
Jeff Preston msa
1
112.00
112.00
Jerry Simons (drafting)
12
93.00
1116.00
Cathy White clerical
4
65.00
260.00
Totals 107 $ 12,784.00
CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE
MINNESOTA
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Ryan Schroeder, City Administrator
FROM: Howard Blin, Community Development Director
DATE: September 29, 2006
RE: East Ravine Major Road Charge
...
In order to pay for improvements to major roads in the East Ravine, a charge against land be-
ing subdivided is proposed. This charge is described in the attached report and summarized
below. This item is for informational purposes only. No action is requested.
Discussion
Within the Neighborhood 1 North area of the East Ravine, improvements will be necessary
over the next several years to the following collector and arterial roadways:
➢ Jamaica Avenue —future County arterial
➢ 70th Street (CR 22) —existing County arterial
➢ Keats Avenue (CR 19) — existing County arterial
➢ Ravine Parkway— future City collector
To pay for the City share of the cost of improvements to these roadways, a roadway charge
against land being subdivided is proposed. This charge would be included in the development
agreement for subdivisions. The amount of the proposed charge is based on the following
analysis:
1. Estimated costs of improvements to the major roadways
2. The expected City share of the improvements. This is estimated at 45 percent of the cost of
County roadways and 100 percent of the cost of Ravine Parkway.
3. The share of traffic on the major roads which is attributable to development of Neighbor-
hood 1. This is determined by comparing current traffic volumes on the roadways with fore-
casted 2020 traffic volumes.
Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Ryan Schroeder
East Ravine Major Road Charge
September 29, 2006
Page 2 of 2
4. An adjustment for the type of residential land use based on typical trip generation from
single family and multiple family developments.
This analysis provides separate charges for single family and multiple family developments. In
addition, since right -of -way costs are included in the estimated costs for roadway improve-
ments, a credit for road right -of -way dedicated as part of the subdivision process will be
granted.
Recommendation
Receive the report. No action is requested.
CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE
MINNESOTA
�r �
I hereby certify that this report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am
a duly licensed Professional Engineer under the
laws of the State of Minnesota.
Thomas G. Thompson, P.E.
September 26, 2006 Reg. No. 40503
Transmittal Memorandum
2
Table of Contents
3
Study Summary
4
Introduction
4
Study Scope
4
Required Improvements
5
Required Right of Way
6
Estimated Costs
7
Financing
8
Appendix A Estimated Roadway Costs
12
East Ravine Major Roadway Special Assessment Study 3
INTRODUCTION
This report addresses the proposed construction and funding of the major roadways within the East
Ravine Neighborhood One. The general study location is shown below in Figure 1. Streets within
this study area were included in the East Ravine AUAR. The purpose of this report is to analyze the
financial costs and capacity in Neighborhood One of the East Ravine for the construction or
reconstruction of the major collector and minor arterial roads.
STUDY SCOPE
This Study consists of street improvements in the general location shown below:
Figure 1 — General Study Location
East Ravine Major Roadway Special Assessment Study 4
Required Improvements
This study includes the construction of public streets owned and maintained by both the City of
Cottage Grove and Washington County contained within the East Ravine Neighborhood One North.
The improvements to these streets are typically funded in whole or part by City funds.
Jamaica Avenue
Jamaica Avenue is currently a City road that extends from Military Road to 100 Street. This study
limits the analysis of Jamaica Avenue from Military Road to 70 Street (CSAH 22). Jamaica Avenue
is currently a four lane divided roadway with no curb and gutter. The section included in this report
is 4875 feet long. The current Right of Way is 100 feet wide. Currently, there is some existing storm
sewer serving the road area.
Jamaica Avenue is to be reconstructed in 2007 to meet the schedule of adjacent development. The
proposed Right of Way width is 150 feet with 75 feet of buffer strip on each side for a total of 300
feet in width. Jamaica Avenue will be reconstructed to a 50 mph design with concrete curb and
gutter and storm sewer and pathways on both sides of the road.
Ravine Parkway
Ravine Parkway is a new State Aid road proposed to extend from Neighborhood Two across Keats
Avenue into Neighborhood One across Jamaica Avenue and then connecting to the current east
end of 65 Street. This study limits the analysis of Ravine Parkway from Keats Avenue to the east
end of 65 Street. The Ravine Parkway is proposed to be 11,500 feet long in this study area and to
have a 140 foot wide Right of Way. Ravine Parkway will be a mix of two lane divided and undivided
road with concrete curb and gutter and storm sewer and pathways on both sides of the road.
Ravine Parkway will have a design speed of 30 mph. Portions of Ravine Parkway are to be
constructed with developments occurring in 2007.
7e Street
70 Street (CSAH 22) is currently a Washington County road that extends from Highway 61 to Keats
Avenue (CSAH 19). 70 Street starts again at Keats Avenue and runs east to Highway 95 past the
border of Cottage Grove. This study limits the analysis of 70 Street from Inwood Avenue to Keats
Avenue (CSAH 19). 70 Street is currently a two lane undivided roadway with no curb and gutter.
The section included in this report is 7930 feet long. The current Right of Way is an average of 120
feet wide. Currently this road drainage is served by ditches and cross culverts.
East Ravine Major Roadway Special Assessment Study
70 Street is currently not scheduled to be reconstructed by the County until adjacent development
drives the need. 70 Street is currently a 50 mph road and will remain as a 50mph road when
reconstructed. This road will be reconstructed to the County Standards for a 4 -lane road including
storm sewer, with pathways on both sides. The proposed Right of Way width is 150 feet with a 75
foot buffer strip on the north side only for a total of 225 feet in width.
Keats Avenue
Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) is currently a Washington County road that extends from Highway 61
north into the City of Woodbury. This study limits the analysis of Keats Avenue from 70 Street to
the Woodbury border. Keats Avenue is currently a two lane undivided roadway with no curb and
gutter. The section included in this report is 5100 feet long. The current Right of Way is an average
of 120 feet wide. Currently this road drainage is served by ditches and cross culverts.
Keats Avenue is currently not scheduled to be reconstructed by the County until adjacent
development drives the need. Keats Avenue is a 55 mph road and will remain a 55 mph road when
reconstructed. This road will be reconstructed to the County Standards for a 4 -lane road including
storm sewer, with pathways on both sides. The proposed Right of Way width is 184 feet.
Intersection Control
Each of the roadways listed above intersects each other at different locations within the Study Area.
These intersections will require a form of intersection control beyond a standard 4 -Way Stop Sign
Control. Either a full signal system with turn lanes or a roundabout controlled intersection will be
required. The following analysis assumes the same construction cost and Right of Way for either
system used.
Required Right of Way
The public streets contained within this study will be constructed within Public Right of Way
owned either by the City of Cottage Grove or Washington County. These Right of Ways are
either existing to be widened through dedication of additional Right of Way by adjacent
developments or through the purchase of additional Right of Way as part of the Street
Improvement Project. For this report the analysis assumes that all Right of Way will be
purchased by the City or County. Developements adjacent to major roadways requiring buffer
zones will be required to dedicate those buffer strips.
East Ravine Major Roadway Special Assessment Study 6
ESTIMATED COSTS
The Special Assessment Charge is based upon the total cost for the improvement of the major
roadways covered in this study. This total cost includes construction costs, Right of Way and
easement costs, Intersection Control costs and indirect costs incurred by these roadway
improvement projects. The County's share has been estimated at 50% of the cost for their
roadways impacted by this study. Right of Way costs have been estimated at $140,000 /acre for the
purposes of this study with a credit of $70,000 /acre.
Cost estimates have been prepared for the construction of the streets to serve all phases of the
area. All costs are based on anticipated 2007 construction and include 30 percent additional for
indirect costs associated with the project. Capitalized interest has been included in the financial
calculations based on 5% interest.
Summary of Major
yV
Street
Construction
Cost
Right of Way
Cost
Total
County Share
(55% Unless
Noted)
City Cost
Jamaica * **
$ 2,930,000.00
$ 391,700.00
$ 3,321,700.00
$ 2,000,000.00
$ 1
Ravine Parkway
$ 5,440,000.00
$ 2,587,240.00
$ 8,027,240.00
$
$ 8,027,240.00
70th Street **
$ 4,800,000.00
$ 4,800 000.00
$ 2,640,000.00
$ 1,080,000.00
Keats Avenue
$ 3,230,000.00
$ 524 520.00
$ 3,754,520.00
$ 2,064,986.00
$ 1
Intersection Control*
$ 1,200,000.00
$ 1,200,000.00
$ 660,000.00
$ 540,000.00
*Based on 4 intersections
Capitalized Interest 5%
$ 632,923.70
Total Costs
$ 17,600,000.00
$ 3,503,460.00
$ 21,103,460.00
$ 7,364,986.00
$13,291,397.70
Area in East Ravine Neighborhood One - North (Net
Developable Area) 654.57 Acres
Cost er Develo able Acre
1 $ 26,887.88 1 $ 5,352.31 $ 32,240.19
$ 20,305.54
East Ravine Major Roadway Special Assessment Study 7
FINANCING
As properties develop in the East Ravine- Neighborhood 1, Major Roadway Special Assessment
Charges will be collected based on a per acre fee. These costs will be included in the Development
Agreements for each parcel. Until the time of development the City will need to provide for the
funding of these street improvements by bonding of the improvement costs.
The area that was used as the basis for these per acre fees includes all of the East Ravine
Neighborhood One — North. The total area encompassed by Neighborhood One North is
approximately 654.57 acres. The fee per acre excludes Wetlands, Nan - assessable parcels and
existing Major Road Right of Way as shown in Figure 2. This study also included an assumed
amount of necessary storm water ponding (4% of gross area) for each development based on
current storm water practices. This storm water area below the anticipated HWL was excluded from
the fee calculation.
East Ravine Major Roadway Special Assessment Study 8
A summary of the areas by current owner or developer and the exclusions for wetlands and existing
Rights of Way are included in Table 2.1
Table 2.1 Area Calculations Summary
Trip Generation Adjustment
This Special Assessment per acre fee is proposed to be adjusted based on the number of trips
generated by the type of development. This is due to the additional traffic flows typically seen from
higher density housing, schools or office sites and retail areas as compared to single family
residential developments or rural estate areas. This adjustment is based on a single family home
being the standard with an additional increase for multi family home sites. Commercial site
Assessment Fees will be negotiated based on the proposed trip generation for each individual use.
East Ravine Major Roadway Special Assessment Study 10
Gross
Area
Ac.
Less Ponds
to HWL
Ac.
Less Major
70th St.
Ac.
Street RAN Including Buffer
Jamaica Co. Rd. Ravine
Ave. 19 Pkwy.
Ac. (Ac. ) (Ac.)
Existing
Wetlands
Ac.
Net
Area
(Ac.
3M
16.89
(0.67)
(2.52)
13.70
Bank
3.85
(0.15)
3.70
Thao (Cedarhurst)
10.49
(0.42)
(0.83)
(0.94)
8.30
Chase Homes
(McHattie)
90.30
(3.61)
(9.90)
(5.10)
71.69
Deutsch
3.86
(0.15)
3.71
Goebel
20.06
(0.80)
(2.12)
17.14
Johnson
6.00
(0.24)
5.76
Knutson
12.95
(0.52)
(1.39)
(2.47)
8.67
Len nar (Botha)
114.68
(4.59)
(4.24)
105.85
Lindridge
4.81
(0.19)
4.62
Marty
2.97
(0.12)
2.85
McHattie
17.76
(0.71)
17.05
McHattie Gridley Trust
4521
(1.81)
43.40
Newland Communities
40.25
(1.61)
(2.31)
36.33
Pemtom (East)
(Wolterstorff)
27.56
(1.10)
26.46
Pemtom (West)
(Wolterstorff)
72.18
(2.89)
(3.60)
(3.76)
(4.64)
57.29
Platinum Development
(Bloomquist, Kaiser,
Kotnour)
35.18
(1.41)
(3.11)
(1.45)
29.22
Rose of Sharon Church
10.79
(0.43)
(1.24)
(1.10)
8.01
Reiland Homes
(Wolterstorff, Stewart)
47.83
(1.91)
(2.50)
(10.99)
32.43
Stechcon
3.88
(0.16)
3.72
Stockwell
18.82
(0.75)
1807
Thao
3.01
(0.12)
(0.52)
2.37
Wozniak
62.47
(2.50)
(2.57).
57.40
Walter
67.28
2.69
4.24
60.35
TOTALS1
739.08
1 (29.56)
1 (7.47)
(17.10
(7.96)
(23.38)
15.63
637.97
Trip Generation Adjustment
This Special Assessment per acre fee is proposed to be adjusted based on the number of trips
generated by the type of development. This is due to the additional traffic flows typically seen from
higher density housing, schools or office sites and retail areas as compared to single family
residential developments or rural estate areas. This adjustment is based on a single family home
being the standard with an additional increase for multi family home sites. Commercial site
Assessment Fees will be negotiated based on the proposed trip generation for each individual use.
East Ravine Major Roadway Special Assessment Study 10
Table 2.2 provides a comparison of 2005 Traffic - Average Daily Traffic (AADT) to Projected 2020
Traffic (AADT) from the City AUAR for the area. This comparison of traffic
Table 2.2 Traffic Count vs. Trip Generation Comparison
Road
2005 AADT
Projected 2020 AADT With
Development
70 Street (CSAH 22)
2,400
10,100
Jamaica Avenue
4,500
15,900
Keats Avenue (CS AH 19)
9,600
12,600
Ravine Parkway
NA
8,000
Military Road
2,500
NA
Total AADT
19,000
46,600
The result of this comparison is that the 2005 Traffic is 41% of the project traffic. Or the increase
due to the projected development is 59 %.
The trip generation for this adjustment is based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE)
Trip Generation Handbook. The individual trips per unit were applied to the typical units per acre.
This number of trips per acre was then simplified to an adjustment factor with Residential Single
Family Zoning being a Factor of 1.
The Formula for the calculation of the Multi Family adjustment factor is as follows:
M.F. Adjustment Factor = (M.F. Trips/Unit x M.F. Units /Acre) +(S.F. Trips/Unit x. S.F. Units/Acre)
The Formula for the calculation of the adjusted rates is as follows:
Cost per Unit (Single Family) = Total Cost = ((Single Family area) x S.F. Adjustment (1)) + (Multifamily Area)
x M.F. Adjustment (2)))
East Ravine Major Roadway Special Assessment Study 11
The adjusted rates are seen in Table 2.3.
Table 2.3 Adjustment Based on Trips
Zonin
Trips /Unit
Typical
Units /Acre
Adjustment
Factor
Net Acres in
Neighborhood 1
Adjusted
CostlAcre
Adjusted
for 59% of
Traffic
Single Family
9.5
2.5
1
580.57
$ 18,243.13
$10,76145
Multi Family
6
8
2
74
$ 36,486.26
$21,526.89
Commercial
®ep Usent on
Negotiated
Negotiated
Negotiated
MSA Impacts
The projects included in this study are the direct result of new development in the East Ravine
Neighborhood 1. These new developments will add approximately 22 % miles of new roads being
constructed. The addition of these roads to the City's Mileage Dedication will result in approximately
4' /z miles of new MSA designate roads. The increase in population and new roads will impact the
City's MSA Annual Disbursement. Both of these criteria are used to determine the disbursement
available to the City. The increase in population and mileage should provide for an increase in the
City's standings in the MSA Disbursement List. However, the City's actual disbursement may not
increase due to other Cities obtaining MSA Status and the amount of available dollars provided to
the system from the State Legislature.
East Ravine Major Roadway Special Assessment Study 12