Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-07-18 PACKET 04.Q.REQUEST OF CITY COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL AGENDA MEETING ITEM # DATE 7/18/12 s PREPARED BY Finance Robin Roland ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT HEAD COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST Consider approval of phone system upgrade. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve agreement with Marco Inc.for the upgrade to the City VoIP phone system. BUDGET IMPLICATION $100,000 $63,077 BUDGETED AMOUNT ACTUAL AMOUNT ADVISORY COMMISSION ACTION DENIED DATE REVIEWED ❑ PLANNING ❑ ❑ PUBLIC SAFETY ❑ ❑ PUBLIC WORKS ❑ ❑ PARKS AND RECREATION ❑ ❑ HUMAN SERVICES /RIGHTS ❑ ❑ ECONOMIC DEV. AUTHORITY ❑ ❑ — ❑ SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ® MEMO /LETTER: Jennings /Roland ❑ RESOLUTION: ❑ ORDINANCE: ❑ ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION: ❑ LEGAL RECOMMENDATION: ® OTHER: Spreadsheet APPROVED DENIED ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ t ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS City Administrator Date COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: ❑ APPROVED ❑ DENIED ❑ OTHER H: \Council items \City Council Action Form.doc City of Cottage Grove J Finance Department TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Ryan Schroeder, City Administrator FROM: Robin Roland, Finance Director DATE: July 12, 2012 SUBJECT: Consider approval of phone system upgrade Introduction The City's phone system is proposed to be upgraded as part of the Public Safety /City Hall project. Discussion The attached memo from the City's MIS Coordinator outlines the history of the current phone system and a spreadsheet analysis of the two proposals received, along with the recommendation for the Mitel solution. Requested Action Approve agreement with Marco Inc. for the upgrade of the City's phone system at a cost of $63,077. CITY OF MINNESOTA To: Robin Roland COTTAGE GROVE From: MIS Coordinator Jenny Jennings Date: 6/19/2012 Subject: Phone System Upgrade Recommendation Introduction With the construction of the Public Safety /City Hall building, city staff has been evaluating phone equipment options at the new site. Two vendors submitted quotes, and the most fiscally responsible solution is to reuse the core of our existing Mitel system, replace our 18 year old handsets and add some advanced features available with a VoIP system such as unified messaging and email integration. Background The current city phone system was purchased in 1994 at a cost of $138,242. Since then, software upgrades were performed in 1995 and 1999, and the main controller was replaced in 2007. City staff requested an upgrade plan from our current vendor (Marco) as well as a complete replacement plan from Dennison Technologies for a Shoretel system, in case that would end up being comparably priced and /or offer more features. Members of the technology sub - committee attended demos of both systems and agreed that either would meet our needs. Recommendation Two vendors submitted proposals for carrying out the conversion; Marco Inc. and Dennison Technology Group (see attached spreadsheets for cost details). Marco's solution reuses our main controllers, replaces our telephones and adds many features to the system, with a savings of more than $25,000 over the Dennison solution. The Marco proposal is the cheaper and preferred solution. The staff recommendation is to hire Marco for this installation. We currently contract with them for annual maintenance on our existing phone system, and have obtained an acceptable level of service. Action Requested Authorize the agreement with Marco for the upgrade to our new telephone system. m O V W O O NN m O m m m O ( N N M O N M M i0 N V M V �O m M M m p N N N M fA (fi 63 m m m t O a O m M O N N M 0 r R � 0 3 (6 O � > 6 O Ul C IR 0 c _ CD .G i N m a J N O. ¢ U E d C a O y 41 U y U Q N iOO OM O m C R m n 662 d 3 p N l0 f0 E m U N E N CL a a a N N N N N a T N d d N l6 d w d n m m m E E E E m .0 'w u E w U L L L L O X K < d U) a anndw wUin tn L o M m in o o r r o o M o 0 o r �rMmo� mmvo Mo Mo r - V'NM lOMN(O M V i0O O O � M M M M O r m O N fA (A N (D m 0 0 r r M t0 ma O m m O r MO M MN i0 N M O r O e- .- U H3 N O N m i0 N --OM -N �- 0 c Q R _ 0 3 m I a p O 0 L C 6 N ca oa E w0 m p "m w m o ow5 J c y N N X N C N O a v U U = m a C d 0 0 C (6 N J J 002 C U n N N Y w 3 -_ N z m o m . a a a m OO m ' � c a u o m m E E c E o N d 0 9> 0 N - W U) N VJ "" a,2 p G L O L L O s U Q D U O N U NN N O U nna »:2 v>>:22o.