HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-07-18 PACKET 04.A.iv.REQUEST OF CITY COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL AGENDA
MEETING ITEM #
DATE 7/18/12 q
e
PREPARED BY Parks and Recreation Zac Dockter
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT STAFF AUTHOR
COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST
Accept and place on file the Minutes of the April 9, 2012 Parks, Recreation and Natural
Resources Commission meeting.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Accept and place on file the Minutes of the April 9, 2012 Parks, Recreation and Natural
Resources Commission meeting.
ADVISORY COMMISSION ACTION
DATE
❑ PLANNING
❑ PUBLIC SAFETY
❑ PUBLIC WORKS
❑ PARKS AND RECREATION
❑ HUMAN SERVICES /RIGHTS
❑ ECONOMIC DEV. AUTHORITY
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
❑ MEMO /LETTER:
❑ RESOLUTION:
❑ ORDINANCE:
❑ ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION:
REVIEWED
APPROVED
DENIED
❑
❑
❑
_
❑
❑
❑
_
❑
❑
❑
_
❑
❑
❑
_
❑
❑
❑
_
❑
❑
❑
_
❑
❑
❑
❑ LEGAL RECOMMENDATION:
® OTHER: Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes
ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS
� f
� ;;;I P
4ity Administrator Date
COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: ❑ APPROVED ❑ DENIED ❑ OTHER
IZOUNCIL FORMSICOUNCIL 2012\Council 7 -18 -12 \Council Action Form April Parks Minutes.doc
ti
City of Cottage Grove
Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting
April 9, 2012
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a Cottage Grove Parks
Meeting was held on April 9, 2012.
CALL TO ORDER
Meeting called to order at 5:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Members Present: Paul Poncin, Bill Schumal, Ron Kath, Doug But
Members Absent: Cristina Marcino, Mark Nelson, Keith Klelnsasse
Others Present: Myron Bailey, Mayor
Ryan Schroeder, City
Jen Peterson, Coonct
Dave Thiede Council
Derrick LeFrke, Coulrn
Zac Dockter, Parks ar
M olly Pietruszewski;
Mark Schneider, Recr
Les Burshten, Public
Jennifer Levitt, City Et
John Bdri ank. Senior
Parks
Council has
referendum.
1. Outd
2. Ham'
3. Thon
4. Land
Coord
Director
1.u1i +I
farted the - meeting. Dockter reviewed the four projects the City
and community groups to consider for discussion for a fall 2012
reviewed were:
Reuse /Indoor Play Center
Development.
Dockter reviewed the minutes from the meeting between the Parks Commissioners, Community
Center Task Force Members and the Thompson Grove Community Building Design Team.
Dockter stated that a good discussion was had with the group and the action recommended by
thegroup to the City Council was as follows:
V The Hamlet Park Project, Indoor Play Center and Future Land Acquisition projects should
be considered as high priority and the group would support this level of referendum.
2. The Outdoor Aquatic Center Project should be considered a low priority. Considering the
financial and market impacts, it seems like it can and probably should wait. Continual
Administrator
City of Cottage Grove Parks and Recreation Commission 11 P a g e
analysis of the project should be done as items like the LA Fitness,
Splash Pad projects develop.
City Council and Park Commission used the information presented to
questioning and format as well as the merits of the actionable items prese
There was discussion as to if and how the questions on the ballot rnig
ranged from how many questions should be placed (one question_;
question for multiple projects) to assuring all sides understand: all the
questioning particularly if any of the projects are passed. It Was discus:
reviewed in detail with both groups prior to any questions being formulat
The City Council and Commissioners thoroughly
presented by staff. Those actionable items were:,,
1. Feasibility Study for Hamlet Park Project - $10,000 ;;;.
2. Community Survey Regarding Referendum Questions
3. Design and Project Cost Refinement of Pool Building
Discussion occurred regarding the costs
Staff stated the feasibility study:wo id u Itk
complete a project of that size so it Would
of the survey process, how ifcouid be`do
the survey might be, it was suggestted
projects is important before the city inye
time, etc.) into any of the projects. Lastly
pool building redesign include a cost e
indoor /outdoor play components built as
for multi- use`of`the facility.
None
The consensus of the
staff to focus on, a redut
and Parks Conmissio
and what the city would be receiving for those expenses.
ely,need to be done with or without the referendum to
not be a "wasted" effort. The group debated the validity
don differently to save costs and also what the impacts of
that gauging the community's interest in any of these
sts any further resources (money, staff and volunteer
Councilman Tii ede asked that the design work for the
5 mate and small design for a vanilla shell with the
a'connected component to the existing building allowing
oup was to move forward with the three actionable items but would like
g'thbse costs if;practical. However, it is important that the City Council
get sufficient information from these processes in order to make sound
- d. All actionable items should be brought to the City Council for final
inutes
Center and
liscuss potential ballot
fed in the staff report.
be presented. Debate
each project or one
plications of the ballot
"this process would be
to assure clarity.'
the merits of the
City of Cottage Grove Parks and Recreation Commission 2 1 P a g e
V. Action Items
A. Safe Routes to School
Burbank presented information on a grant the city is we
to School Program. He stated that the city has al
community with no positive results. It was found
educational, engineering and other community; pat
receiving these federal grant dollars. The city is noww
safety, Washington County Public Works, planning, en€
and more to get grant money for a mapping�planninglei
future grant application in 2013. Burbank stated it
process working with so many other, community ori6nte
our non- motorized vehicle access routes. A moti€
submission of a grant application for thy, Safe
seconded by Nollan and carried unanimously: ,,1
B. Mississippi River Access
king on for the Safe Routes
flied a couple,, times as a
hat it's import ant to have
iers : to be successful in
rking with the schoolppblic
leering, residents, teachers'
;jineering study relative;fo a
has been an encouraging
I groups looking to improve
t by Kath to support the
s to School program was
Burbank presented information in regards to the Mississippi River in Cottage Grove.
Burbank discussed' the geography surrounding the area `including, zoning, current
ownership, land use organizations and more. John also highlighted potential future
public river access opportunities. The presentation was informational only.
Motion to
seconded by Kath, motion carried at 7:44pm.
City of Cottage Grove Parks and Recreation Commission 3 1 P a g e