HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-08-22 ACHP Minutes c ,
�
�
j w
MEETING NOTICE
s
ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON
HISTORIC PRESERVATION
Tuesday, August 22" 2000
7:00 P.M.
City Hall Conference Room
Agenda (tentative)
I. Call to order
II. Roll call
III. Approve minutes of May 16 2000 regular meeting
IV. Approval of agenda
V. Staff reports
A. Survey of 1941-1973 heritage resources ("Ozzie & HarrieY' project)
B. Heritage resources inventory update
VI. Unfinished business
A. Demolition permit review procedures
, VII. New business
A. Nominations to City Register of Historic Sites & Landmarks
B. Agricultural heritage education site
VIII. Other new business
IX. Council liaison report
X. Adjournment
Final agendas and meeting packets will be mailed approximately one week prior to the
meeting.
If you are unable to attend, please contact CHPO Robert Vogel (tel. 651-604-0175; e-
mail <voge1014@tc.umn.edu>) orACHP Chair Gary Golusky (tel. 6S1-4S9-1721; e-mail
<gol usky@mediaone. net>).
,,
- ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
AUGUST 22, 2000
CALL TO ORDER
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the Advisory Committee on Historic
Preservation (ACHP) was held at the Historic Cottage Grove Town Hall, 9540 Islay Ave.
So., on the 22 of August, 2000.
Chairperson Golusky called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m.
ROLL CALL
The following members were present: Gary Golusky (chair), Keith Kleinsasser, Herb
Japs (Planning Commission representative), Diane Fredrickson (Parks Commission
representative), Cheryl Kohls (City Council liaison) and Robert Vogel (City Historic
Preservation Officer).
Mr. Sundgaard was absent. CHPO Vogel informed the Committee that Ms. Valek has
resigned, effective immediately.
The following guests were in attendance: Mr. Glenn Brown and Mr. Mickey McBride,
both prospective new members.
MINUTES OF MAY 16, 2000, MEETING
The minutes of the May 16, 2000, regular meeting were approved as mailed.
CLG GRANT PROJECT
CHPO Vogel reported on the progress of the reconnaissance survey of historic properties
from 1941-1973 (the "Ozzie & Harriet ProjecY'), which is nearing completion. The final
report is expected to be delivered to the ACHP in September.
HERITAGE RESOURCES INVENTORY
The Committee reviewed the current list of heritage resources that have been listed in or
determined eligible for nomination to the City Register of Historic Sites and Landmarks.
There was discussion of the results of the three-year inventory reorganization project and
Historic Preservation Division plans for maintaining the historic property files.
1
,
i `'
I
DEMOLITION PERMIT 1�EVIEW PROCEDURES
The Committee reviewed the new city policy regarding CHPO review of demolition
permits for buildings more�than fifly years old. CHPO Vogel advised the Committee that
in the future the Fire Depa�tment would take out city permits for old buildings burned as
part of training exercises.' There was consensus that the City should adopt a written
administrative policy conc�rning demolition permit review that clearly states the policy
objectives and implement�tion procedures. Chairperson Golusky directed the CHPO to
consult with the City Ad�inistrator and Community Development Director on drafting
an appropriate demolition permit policy statement for review by the ACHP at its next
regular meeting.
CITY REGISTER NO TION PROCESS
CHPO Vogel reported th t he and the Community Development Director had been
working on a process f r improving city staff participation in the nomination of
properties to the City Regi ter of Historic Sites and Landmarks. Under the proposed new
procedure, the ACHP wi 1 continue to issue Findings of Significance whenever it
determines that a buildin� or site meets the City Register eligibility criteria. Prior to
making the actual nomir}ations, however, the ACHP will first circulate the draft
registration materials to C�ty department heads, allowing senior staff an opportunity to
comment on the nominat�on's possible effects on planning, zoning, finance, public
works, parks and recreati�n, public safety, economic development, and administration;
other city advisory cornmjissions would also be given an opportunity to review and
comment on City Register �ominations.
There was discussion of e ACHP's role in determining the eligibility of individual
buildings and sites and no inating them to the City Register. By ordinance, the ACHP is
solely responsible for det rmining whether properties are significant under the City
Register eligibility criteria The CHPO is the preservation professional responsible for
making the case for histo 'cal, architectural, or archeological significance. Committee
members felt very strongl that their evaluation of a property's City Register eligibility
must be based solely on i historical, azchitectural, or archeological merits, and that it
was not appropriate for th ACHP to consider the economic or political ramifications of
their decisions. However, �khere was consensus that the City Council needed sufficient
information to make a bal�nced and adequate consideration of the effects of each City
Register nomination on tl�e community at large, and that it would always be in the
public's interest to have cit� staffparticipation in the City Register nomination process.
After debating the issue, th�e Committee reached consensus that future nominations to the
City Register of Historic S�tes and Landmarks will be preceded by a 45-day staff review
and comment period. Thi� staff review and comment period will occur only after the
ACHP has issued its Findi�g of Significance, but before it makes it formal nomination to
the City Council. ',
I �I
'I
2
I
.
' AGRICULTURAL HERITAGE EDUCATION
The Committee reviewed its previous discussions (going back to 1998) on the need to
provide better opportunities to educate K-12 students (and adults) about Cottage Grove's
agricultural heritage. The relative merits of historic farm tours, farming museums, and
"living history" fanns were discussed, and a number of potential partnerships were
identified. While there was general agreement that this initiative would have low priority
in the Historic Preservation Division due to staff time and funding limitations, the CHPO
agreed to contact county, regional, and statewide organizations and inform them of the
Committee's interest in agricultural heritage education. The HPD will also continue to
gather information on similar agriculture education initiatives in Minnesota and
elsewhere.
APPOINTMENT OF ASSOCIATE CHAIRPERSON
CHPO Vogel informed the Committee that Ms. Tina Valek had resigned from the
Committee, effective immediately, because she is moving to Woodbury and will no
longer meet the residency requirement. Chairperson Golusky directed staff to write Ms.
Valek a letter thanking her for her service on the Committee. Because Ms. Valek was the
Committee's Associate Chairperson for 2000, Chairperson Golusky appointed Mr.
Kleinsasser as interim Associate Chairperson.
COUNCIL REPORT
Councilmember Kohls reported on recent City Council actions and the 2001 budget.
PROSPECTNE NEW MEMBERS
Mr. Brown and Mr. McBride addressed the Committee and requested that they be
appointed to fill the vacancies created by the resignations of Mr. Einberger and Ms.
Valek. CHPO Vogel advised the Committee that both gentlemen were qualified for
appointment. (Note: the other applicants had not responded to Chairperson Golusky's
invitation to attend the Committee meeting.) Chairperson Golusky directed the CHPO to
forward the Brown and McBride applications to the City Council with the Committee's
recommendation for appointment.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:15 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Robert C. Vogel
City Historic Preservation Officer
3