Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-02-20 PACKET 06.A.REQUEST OF CITY COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL AGENDA MEETING ITEM # DATE 2/20/13 PREPARED BY Community Development ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT Jennifer Levitt STAFF AUTHOR COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST 1. Hold the public hearing for the 2013 Pavement Management Project, Districts C1 and C2. 2. Consider ordering the project. 3. Consider authorizing the preparation of plans and specifications. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. Hold the public hearing for the 2013 Pavement Management Project, Districts C1 and C2. 2. Adopt the resolution ordering the 2013 Pavement Management Project, Districts C1 and C2 and authorizing the preparation of plans and specifications. BUDGET IMPLICATION BUDGETED AMOUNT ACTUAL AMOUNT SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS FUNDING SOURCE ® MEMO /LETTER: Memo from Jennifer Levitt dated 2/14/13; Memo from City Attorney; Correspondence from residents ® RESOLUTION: Draft ❑ ORDINANCE: ❑ ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION: ❑ LEGAL RECOMMENDATION: ® OTHER: Feasibility Report, Map of Districts C1 and C2, Special Benefit Appraisals ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS Q f NL (I City Administrator Date ***************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: ❑ APPROVED ❑ DENIED ❑ OTHER CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE MINNESOTA To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Ryan Schroeder, City Administrator From: Jennifer M. Levitt, P.E., City Engineer Date: February 14, 2013 Re: 2013 Pavement Management, Districts C1 and C2: 1. Hold Public Hearing 2. Order Project 3. Authorization Preparation of Plans and Specifications Background On June 1, 2011 the City Council authorized a feasibility report for the Pavement Management Area as outlined in the Capital Improvement Plan for two areas: 1) Area east of Jamaica, north of 80th Street, west of Kingston (District Cl); and 2) Area south of Kingston and north of 80th Street [Jenner, Jocelyn, and 79th Street] (District C3). The City Council held a workshop session on August 10, 2011 to discuss the various elements of the proposed improvements. At the workshop, staff presented the preliminary findings of soil boring results of the area, which showed unfavorable results to include District C3 in the project for a mill and overlay. The rec- ommendation was not to proceed with District C3 and allow the roads to further deteriorate to the point in which reclamation of the roads would be warranted. Ultimately that project was not ordered. Instead, a review of the City's IMTF policy was ordered. Approval was provided on August 8, 2012 for the revisions to the IMTF Policy. On August 8, 2012, the City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report for the Pavement Management Districts C1 and C2. As part of the feasibility report, improvements for trail expansion and improvements to Kingston Park have been included; this is consistent with past Pavement Management Projects. As di- rected at the workshop session held on January 2, 2013, costs for electrical outlets on the peri- meter of the main parking lot have been added. The preliminary construction cost estimate for the electrical is $20,000 plus 10 percent for contingency. Further discussions can take place regarding the cost recovery for this addition with the Strawberry Festival once the project has been ordered. The total cost of the proposed park improvements is $525,285.48. A neighborhood meeting for the project was held on January 8, 2013 at 7:00 p.m. at Cottage Grove Middle School. There were approximately 80 people in attendance. The City Council, on January 16, 2013, approved the feasibility study and called for a public hearing to be held on February 20, 2013. All notices and publications have been completed according to State Statute. Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Ryan Schroeder 2013 Pavement Management, Districts C1 and C2 February 14, 2013 Page 2 of 5 Discussion Summary of Road and Infrastructure Improvements Road Rehabilitation: Full Road Reconstruction The rehabilitation method proposed for the streets in District C1 (green) and District C2 (purple) is to remove the existing asphalt surface and replace with a new surface, which will consist of two lifts of bituminous. All of the concrete curb and gutter will be replaced as part of the project. Also proposed are some minor utility improvements for sanitary sewer, water, and stormwater. The potential assessment for the improvements listed above is estimated at $4,100 per residen- tial lot. The multi - family unit assessment has a potential assessment of $1,600 per unit. Under the revised Infrastructure Maintenance Task Force (IMTF) policy assuming a 3.5 percent inter- est rate, the resulting assessments would average $29.16 /month (on $4,100) or $11.38 /month (on $1600). These estimates would vary depending upon final project cost and City bond costs. Road Rehabilitation: Mill and Overlay In District C2 (dark blue) the street will be rehabilitated using a mill and overlay technique. This is the milling off of the top surface of the asphalt and the new lift of asphalt being installed. There will be spot curb replacement as part of the mill and overlay. In addition, there will be minor utility improvements made to the area. The potential assessment for the mill and overlay area is $2,500 per residential lot. Under the IMTF policy, this level of assessment translates into an estimated average monthly cost of $17.75. Road Rehabilitation and Utility Work In District C2 (light blue) additional utility work will be done to facilitate stormwater drainage from the South Washington Watershed District management area. Properties that are outlined in light blue will experience more substantial utility work, with large excavation for installation of new piping. This extensive utility work will result in the street being fully reconstructed. Properties outlined in light blue will NOT pay for a full reconstruction, but the equivalent of a mill and over- lay, which is the road rehabilitation method for which it was originally scheduled. Project Funding Analysis The total project cost for the road work, utility, storm sewer, and park improvements is $7,661,979.52. According to the City's policy, 45 percent of the total project cost for road work and utilities is assessed against the benefiting properties. The total project value that is as- sessed residentially is $2,286,592.33 for the Districts C1 and C2. The School District's potential assessment is $78,900, per the special benefit analysis completed. The South Washington Watershed District is responsible for $548,639.79. The Cost Estimate Summary can be viewed in Appendix C of the Feasibility Report. A benefit appraisal was ordered for properties within the C1 and C2 Districts. There was found to be a special benefit of $5,000 per property for full pavement replacement, which is greater than the proposed assessment for the residential lot. Benefit appraisals were ordered for the multi - family units, and the benefit was found to be $1,600, which is less than what would other- wise be the proposed assessment. Special benefit appraisals were also conducted for the mill 2 Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Ryan Schroeder 2013 Pavement Management, Districts C1 and C2 February 14, 2013 Page 3 of 5 and overlay properties, and the benefit was found to be $2,500, which is greater than the proposed assessment. As has been done historically, the City will issue General Obligation Improvement Project Bonds under Minnesota State Statute Chapter 429 to fund the cost of the project. These bonds would be issued for a 15 -year term and the annual debt service would be a combination of City tax levy and special assessments. Interest rates on similar municipal debt issuance are currently in the 2 percent to 2.4 percent range, although the interest rate will be determined on the date of sale. The Pavement Management Capital Project fund had a cash balance of approximately $990,000 on December 31, 2012, which is sufficient to fund initial engineering and construction mobilization costs for the project. However, the majority of the construction costs for the project will require cash flow received from the sale of the aforementioned bonds. Staff anticipates the sale of the bonds in June after the bids have been received and actual project costs are known. Currently, the City has $4,810,000 in outstanding pavement management debt, with an annual debt service of $470,000 and an annual tax levy of $256,600. The difference between the debt service and the tax levy is the amount of special assessment revenue collected each year. Annual Debt Amount issued Service Annual Levy Imp Bnds 2009A $ 3,650,000 $ 325,000 $ 175,000 Imp Bnds 2012A 1,865,000 145,000 81,600 subtotal $ 5,515,000 $ 470,000 $ 256,600 Imp Bnds 2013 (est) $ 6,200,000 $ 470,000 $ 305,000 Project Option Discussion Option #1: Order the project as outlined in the feasibility report for Districts C1 and C2. The benefit of proceeding with the project is that project costs are stable and a good bidding en- vironment exists, which reduces the burden to the general taxpayers and the residents adjacent to the project who are paying assessments. Also resulting from renewed pavements are re- duced maintenance costs associated with the streets in the project area. Those maintenance dollars and resources can then be reallocated elsewhere within the community, which is a ben- efit to the general taxpayer. There are similar maintenance benefits resulting from improvements to the utility systems. All of the park and trail improvements at Kingston Park will be constructed as outlined in the feasibility report, which benefits all of the residents in the community. It should be noted here that the park improvement expenditures are not being assessed to the surrounding neighbor- hood. 3 Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Ryan Schroeder 2013 Pavement Management, Districts C1 and C2 February 14, 2013 Page 4 of 5 The CIP outlines a fiscally responsible plan to rehabilitate roads and utilities within the commu- nity. By ordering the project, the street maintenance program will stay on schedule, which pro- vides the opportunity to maintain streets in the most cost effective way to the general taxpayer. Option #2: Do not order the project as outlined in the feasibility report for Districts C1 and C2. If District C1 and C2 improvements are not ordered, the roads will continue to deteriorate, which will result in increased maintenance costs. Those costs are borne by all taxpayers, not just the property owners that live on those streets. As with any delayed project, there are increased costs related to commodities, labor, and economic conditions, which all relate to the construc- tion index. The end result is a typical increase of 2.5 percent to 8 percent annually for the project. When a pavement management project is delayed, it creates a domino effect by delay- ing all future pavement management projects. The cost of the domino effect is hard to capture, since there are pavement projects planned each year into the future. It has been identified through surveys that it is of value to this community to maintain the city's road infrastructure at a high level. The City approach since 1994 has been to ensure a safe condition and preserve the structural integrity of roads in a fiscally - responsible manner. Independent third party benefit ap- praisals conducted since 2007 have concluded that this program improves property values within project areas from that which would otherwise be the case. If District C2, specifically the streets encompassing the South Washington Watershed District project, were not ordered, the City would be in default of its agreement with SWWD, Washington County, and the City of Woodbury. Further, the improvements to Kingston Park and trail im- provements would not be constructed. Option #3: Order the project for District C2 to correspond with the South Washington Watershed District improvements. The project coincides with the Washington County and South Washington Watershed District overflow project and 70th Street realignment. It is critical that storm sewer on Joliet Avenue and Jocelyn Avenue be constructed to be in conformance and agreement with the mediated settle- ment with the Watershed District, Washington County, and Woodbury. The connections made to the City storm sewer need to be made in order to make the SWWD project design function. The residents living on those streets gain the benefit of a fully reconstructed street with only having to pay for a mill and overlay assessment. Kingston Park improvements would not occur if District C1 is not ordered. If C1 District improvements were not ordered, the roads will continue to deteriorate, which will result in increased maintenance costs. Those costs are borne by all taxpayers, not just the property owners that live on those streets. As with any delayed project there are increased costs related to commodities, labor, and economic conditions, which all relate to the construction index. The end result is a typical increase of 2.5 percent to 8 percent annually for the project. When a pavement management project is delayed, it creates a domino effect by delaying all fu- ture pavement management projects. The cost of the domino effect is hard to capture, since there are pavement management projects planned each year into the future. It is valuable as a n Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Ryan Schroeder 2013 Pavement Management, Districts C1 and C2 February 14, 2013 Page 5 of 5 community to keep the city's road infrastructure in a safe manner and preserve the structural integrity of roads in a fiscally responsible manner. In addition, this helps to maintain property values within project areas. It should be noted to Council per Minnesota State Statute 429.031; the resolution must be adopted by four - fifths vote for project to be ordered and the project to proceed. Recommendation It is recommended the Council adopt a resolution ordering the project and authorize preparation of plans and specifications for the 2013 Pavement Management Project District C1 and C2. 5 RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -XXX A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROJECT, DISTRICTS C1 AND C2 WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted on January 16, 2013, fixed a date for the Council to hold a public hearing, pursuant to Minn. Stat. Chapter 429.011 to 429.111, on the proposed improvement benefitting properties that include: District Cl: • 75th Street South from Jamaica Avenue South to Indian Boulevard South • Jeffery Avenue South loop from 75th Street South to 75th Street South • Jasmine Avenue South from 75th Street South to 78th Street South • Jasmine Avenue South from Jasmine Avenue South to cul -de -sac, south of 75th Street South • Jasmine Avenue South from Jasmine Avenue South to cul -de -sac, north of Janero Avenue South • Jeffery Avenue South from 75th Street South to 80th Street South • Jeffery Avenue South from Jeffery Avenue South to cul -de -sac, south of Jensen Avenue South • Jeffery Court South from Jeffery Avenue South to cul -de -sac • Jensen Avenue South loop from Jeffery Avenue South to Jeffery Avenue South • Janero Avenue South from Jeffery Avenue South to 79th Street South • Janero Court from Janero Avenue South to cul -de -sac • 78th Street South from Janero Avenue South to Jeffery Avenue South • 78th Street Court South from 78th Street South to cul -de -sac • 79th Street South from Janero Avenue South to Jeffery Avenue South District C2: • Indian Boulevard South from Jamaica Avenue South to Keats Avenue South • Janero Avenue South from Indian Boulevard South to Jenner Lane South • Jenner Lane South loop from Janero Avenue South to Janero Avenue South • Jenner Alcove from Jenner Lane South to cul -de -sac • Jenner Bay from Jenner Lane South to cul -de -sac • Jenner Circle from Jenner Lane South to cul -de -sac • 73rd Street South from Janero Avenue South to Jensen Avenue South • Jensen Avenue South from 70th Street South to Indian Boulevard South • 71st Street South from Jenner Lane South to Jewel Avenue South • 71 st St. Bay from 71 st Street South to cul -de -sac • 72nd Street South from Jensen Avenue South to Jocelyn Avenue South • Indian Boulevard South cul -de -sac (9100's) from Indian Boulevard South to cul -de -sac • Indian Boulevard Court from Indian Boulevard South to cul -de -sac • Jewel Avenue South from Indian Boulevard South to 71st Street South Resolution No. 2013 -XXX Page 2 of 2 • Jocelyn Avenue South from Indian Boulevard South to Joliet Avenue South • Jocelyn Place South from Jocelyn Avenue South to cul -de -sac • Jocelyn Bay from Jocelyn Avenue South to cul -de -sac • Jocelyn Alcove northwest from Jocelyn Avenue South to cul -de -sac • Jocelyn Alcove southeast from Jocelyn Avenue South to cul -de -sac • 72nd Street South from Jocelyn Avenue South to Joliet Avenue South • Joliet Avenue South from 70th Street South to Indian Boulevard South • 72nd Street South from Joliet Avenue South to Jonathan Avenue South • Joliet Circle from Joliet Avenue South to cul -de -sac • Indian Boulevard South cul -de -sac (9600's) from Indian Boulevard South to cul -de -sac WHEREAS, ten days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the City desires to assess the cost of said improvements to all benefited properties. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota: 1. Such improvement is necessary, cost - effective, and feasible as detailed in the feasibility report. The improvement shall include road rehabilitation, park improvement, trails, water, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and street lights. 2. Such improvement is hereby ordered. 3. Bolton and Menk, Inc. is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. 4. The City Council declares its official intent to reimburse itself for the costs of the improvement from the proceeds of the tax exempt bond. Passed this 20th day of February 2013. Myron Bailey, Mayor Attest: Caron M. Stransky, City Clerk Consulting Engineers & Surveyors 0 "'1 mm, Cottage Grove h ere Pride and ?r05perity Meet Feasibility Report for 2013 Pavement Management Project City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota January 2013 Project Number N15.105420 1 rJ 4=0 • Bc:> L_'i'ON & M I N K, i N Consulting Engineers & Surveyors " 2035 County Road D East - Suite B - Maplewood, MN 55109 -5314 Phone (651) 704 -9970 - Fax (651) 704 -9971 www.bolton- menk.com January 16, 2013 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Cottage Grove 12800 Ravine Parkway South Cottage Grove, MN 55016 RE: 2013 Pavement Management Project BMI Project No. N15.105420 Honorable Mayor and City Council Members, Enclosed for your review is the 2013 Pavement Management Project Feasibility Report. The project scope includes street rehabilitation and utility repairs within pavement districts C1 and C2, as identified in this report. This report describes the improvements necessary within the project area. Cost estimates for the proposed improvements are presented in the Report. We would be happy to discuss this report at your convenience. Please contact me at 651- 968 -7674 if you have any questions. Sincerely, BOLTON & MENK, INC. "vU - &� Mike Boex, PE DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT FEASIBILITY REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Tableof Contents ...................................................................................................... ............................... i Certification............................................................................................................ ............................... iii Introduction.............................................................................................................. ............................... 1 Existing Conditions — Disctrict C1 ............................................................................ ............................... 2 Streets................................................................................................................ ............................... 2 SanitarySewer ................................................................................................... ............................... 3 WaterMain ........................................................................................................ ............................... 3 StormSewer ...................................................................................................... ............................... 3 Existing Conditions — Disctrict C2 ............................................................................ ............................... 4 Streets................................................................................................................ ............................... 4 SanitarySewer .................................................................................................... ..............................5 WaterMain ........................................................................................................ ............................... 5 StormSewer ...................................................................................................... ............................... 5 Existing Conditions — Disctrict C3 ............................................................................ ............................... 5 Streets................................................................................................................ ............................... 5 SanitarySewer .................................................................................................... ..............................6 WaterMain ........................................................................................................ ............................... 6 StormSewer ...................................................................................................... ............................... 6 Proposed Improvements — District C 1 ....................................................................... ............................... 6 Streets................................................................................................................ ............................... 6 SanitarySewer ................................................................................................... ............................... 7 WaterMain ........................................................................................................ ............................... 7 StormSewer ...................................................................................................... ............................... 7 StormWater Quality .......................................................................................... ............................... 8 Proposed Improvements — District C2 ....................................................................... ............................... 8 Streets................................................................................................................ ............................... 8 SanitarySewer ................................................................................................... ............................... 9 WaterMain ........................................................................................................ ............................... 9 StormSewer ...................................................................................................... ............................... 9 WNW City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota Table of Contents 2013 Pavement Management Project Page i 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT StormWater Quality & SWWD ......................................................................... ............................... 9 Proposed Improvements — District C3 ..................................................................... ............................... 10 Streets.............................................................................................................. ............................... 10 SanitarySewer ................................................................................................. ............................... 10 WaterMain ...................................................................................................... ............................... 11 StormSewer .................................................................................................... ............................... 11 StormWater Quality ........................................................................................ ............................... 11 AlternateBid .......................................................................................................... ............................... 11 Streets.............................................................................................................. ............................... 11 Proposed Improvements — Kingston Park ................................................................ ............................... 11 Parking Lots & Access Drive ........................................................................... ............................... 11 Trails............................................................................................................... ............................... 12 AccessoryItems ............................................................................................... ............................... 12 Park Improvement Cost Summary .................................................................... ............................... 12 Permitsand Easements ........................................................................................... ............................... 13 EstimatedCosts ...................................................................................................... ............................... 13 CostAllocation ................................................................................................ ............................... 13 Financing......................................................................................................... ............................... 16 PublicHearing ........................................................................................................ ............................... 16 ProjectSchedule ..................................................................................................... ............................... 16 Conclusion And Recommendations ........................................................................ ............................... 17 City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota Table of Contents 2013 Pavement Management Project Page ii 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT Appendix A — Existing Pavement Condition Photos Appendix B — Figures Figure 1 —Location Map Figure 2 — Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Figure 3 — Streets - Year Constructed Figure 4 — Proposed Improvements Figure 5 — Utility Repairs (C1 & C3) Figure 6 — Utility Repairs (C2) Figure 7 — Assessable Parcels (C 1) Figure 8 — Assessable Parcels (C2) Figure 9 — Pavement Cores (C1 & C3) Figure 10 — Pavement Cores (C2) Figure 11 — Kingston Park Improvements Figure 12 — SWWD CDSF Improvements Figure 13 — Indian Boulevard Realignment Appendix C — Cost Estimate Summary Appendix D — Preliminary Assessment Roll Appendix E PCI Overview CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Michael J. Boex, P.E. License No. 44576 Bolton & Menk, Inc. Date: January 16, 2013 City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota Certification 2013 Pavement Management Project Page iii 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT INTRODUCTION The Pinetree Pond East 2 °d Addition, Pinetree Pond East 3rd , 6"', 7 and 8 th Additions, East Parkview 1St and 2n Additions, Prestige Estates 1s'& 2 °d Additions, and Prestige Estates on the Park residential neighborhoods have been identified as candidates for rehabilitation during the 2013 construction season as a part of the City of Cottage Grove's ongoing roadway rehabilitation program. The City Council authorized preparation of this Report to determine the feasibility of rehabilitating those streets as a part of the 2013 Pavement Management Project. Pinetree Pond East 2 °d Addition and a portion of Pinetree Pond East 3r Addition are located in the Northeast corner of the 80 Street & Jamaica Avenue intersection and are part of Pavement Management District C1, as shown on Figure 1 located in Appendix A. There are fourteen residential streets within these neighborhoods totaling approximately 14,900 lineal feet. Pavement Management District C2 is comprised of Pinetree Pond East 3r 0 ', 7 and 8 th Additions as well as East Parkview 1S and 2 nd Additions. C2 is located immediately south of 70 Street between Jamaica Avenue and Keats Avenue. There are twenty -four residential streets within these neighborhoods totaling approximately 24,800 lineal feet. The Prestige Estates 1S & 2 "d Additions and Prestige Estates on the Park are located just east of the Pinetree Pond East 2" d Addition north of 80 Street. It's part of Pavement Management District C3 as shown on Figure 1 located in Appendix A. There are three residential streets within this area totaling approximately 3,950 lineal feet. The purpose of this report is to further evaluate the work actually required for this street rehabilitation project, to provide an estimate of cost, and to establish a method of cost allocation or assessment in order to determine the physical and economic feasibility. This feasibility report examines the following street segments: District C1: 1. 75 Street So. from Jamaica Avenue So. to Indian Boulevard So. 2. Jeffery Avenue So. loop from 75 Street So. to 75 Street So. 3. Jasmine Avenue So. from 75 Street So. to 78` Street So. 4. Jasmine Avenue So. from Jasmine Avenue So. to cul -de -sac, south of 75 Street So. 5. Jasmine Avenue So. from Jasmine Avenue So. to cul -de -sac, north of Janero Avenue So. 6. Jeffery Avenue So. from 75 Street So. to 80 Street So. 7. Jeffery Avenue So. from Jeffery Avenue So. to cul -de -sac, south of Jensen Avenue So. 8. Jeffery Court from Jeffery Avenue So. to cul -de -sac 9. Jensen Avenue So. loop from Jeffery Avenue So. to Jeffery Avenue So. 10. Janero Avenue So. from Jeffery Avenue So. to 79"' Street So. 11. Janero Court from Janero Avenue So. to cul -de -sac. 12. 78 Street So. from Janero Avenue So. to Jeffery Avenue So. 13. 78 Street Court from 78 Street So. to cul -de -sac 14. 79 Street So. from Janero Avenue So. to Jeffery Avenue So. District C2: 1. Indian Boulevard So. from Jamaica Avenue So. to Keats Avenue So. 2. Janero Avenue So. from Indian Boulevard So. to Jenner Lane So. 3. Jenner Lane So. loop from Janero Avenue So. to Janero Avenue So. 4. Jenner Alcove from Jenner Lane So. to cul -de -sac. City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota 2013 Pavement Management Project Page 1 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT 5. Jenner Bay from Jenner Lane So. to cul -de -sac. 6. Jenner Circle from Jenner Lane So. to cul -de -sac. 7. 73` Street So. from Janero Avenue So. to Jensen Avenue So. 8. Jensen Avenue So. from 70"' Street So. to Indian Boulevard So. 9. 71" Street So. from Jenner Lane So. to Jewel Avenue So. 10. 71s Sheet Bay from 71 Street So. to cul -de -sac. 11. 72 Street So. from Jensen Avenue So. to Jocelyn Avenue So. 12. Indian Boulevard So. cul -de -sac (9100's) from Indian Boulevard So. to cul -de -sac. 13. Indian Boulevard Court from Indian Boulevard So. to cul -de -sac. 14. Jewel Avenue So. from Indian Boulevard So. to 71" Street So. 15. Jocelyn Avenue So. from Indian Boulevard So. to Joliet Avenue So. 16. Jocelyn Place So. from Jocelyn Avenue So. to cul -de -sac. 17. Jocelyn Bay from Jocelyn Avenue So. to cul -de -sac. 18. Jocelyn Alcove northwest from Jocelyn Avenue So. to cul -de -sac. 19. Jocelyn Alcove southeast from Jocelyn Avenue So. to cul -de -sac. 20. 72 Street So. from Jocelyn Avenue So. to Joliet Avenue So. 21. Joliet Avenue So. from 70 Street So. to Indian Boulevard So. 22. 72 Street So. from Joliet Avenue So. to Jonathan Avenue So. 23. Juliet Circle from Joliet Avenue So. to cul -de -sac. 24. Indian Boulevard So. cul -de -sac (9600's) from Indian Boulevard So. to cul -de -sac. District C3: 1. Jocelyn Avenue So. from 80 Street So. to Jenner Avenue So. 2. 79 Street So. loop from Jocelyn Avenue So. to Jocelyn Avenue So. 3. Jenner Avenue So. from 80` Street So. to Jocelyn Avenue So. EXISTING CONDITIONS - DISCTRICT C1 STREETS The streets within District CI are urban - residential and were originally constructed in the early 1980's. Generally, the streets are 32 feet wide (from face of curb to face of curb) with concrete curb and gutter. Jeffery Avenue is classified as a collector roadway between 80 Street and 75' Street, as is 75 Street from Jamaica Avenue to Indian Boulevard. Both of these collector streets are approximately 44 feet wide (from face of curb to face of curb) with concrete curb and gutter. Each collector is marked with a double yellow centerline and a white lane delineator on each side of the roadway for the purposes of pedestrians and bikes. A visual inspection was performed in 2012 to evaluate pavement surface conditions. The inspection determined the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of these streets generally range from 35 -45. Pavements in the lower end of that range are considered poor and generally have major distress. In contrast, the 1994 Pavement Management Plan depicted PCI's in the range of 49 -80. Per that plan, PCI's in those ranges are classified as "Fair" and "Good ". Since 1994, pavement condition has continued to deteriorate and much of the pavements have major distress and are "Poor ". Figure 2 depicts the PCI rating at each street and Figure 3 depicts the age of the streets within the neighborhood. In addition, there are sections of existing curb and gutter that have settled, cracked, or have other defects that will require replacement. Appendix A contains some representative photos of the existing pavement condition. It should be noted that this District was originally proposed for rehabilitation in 1999 as a part of the 1999 Pavement Management Project. At that time, the streets were approximately 20 years old and the Public Works Department had been providing the normal street patching and seal coat maintenance. It was City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota 2013 Pavement Management Project Page 2 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT proposed in the 1999 Pavement Management Feasibility Report that this area receive a Mill & Overlay, meaning the existing pavement would be milled, patching and joint repair would occur, and a new bituminous overlay would be placed. The total project cost was estimated to be approximately $495,000 and the proposed assessment was $1,639 per lot. In 1999, the assessment policy for this type of project was I% of the assessed market value, or actual construction costs for the Mill /Overlay rehabilitation method of construction. Ultimately, the residents in this area objected to the project and Council did not proceed with ordering the plans & specifications for this area. Instead, it was decided that a pavement management project be pushed off into the future with the possibility of increased pavement deterioration and therefore increased future rehabilitation and assessment costs. In the meantime, these streets would continue to receive normal maintenance from Public Works. Coring of the pavement was performed to determine the thickness of the existing street section. This information was used to design a recommended pavement section. From the cores, it can be seen that the average section consists of 3 inches of bituminous over 4 -5 inches of gravel. Existing Street Section — District C1 No. Location Bituminous (in) Aggregate Base (in) 1 7789 Janero Avenue 3" 4" 2 7787 Jeffery Avenue 3 -1/2" 4" 3 7555 Jeffery Avenue 3" 8" 4 9187 75 "' Street 4 3" 5 7420 Jeffery Avenue 3 5" SANITARY SEWER The sanitary sewer system within the Pinetree Pond East Additions consists of 8 and 12 -inch VCP. The only exception to this is a 12 -inch reinforced concrete pipe southeast of 75 Street through Kingston Park. The existing sanitary sewer has been televised to evaluate pipe condition. The televising reports show that the pipe is in good condition. However, some problems encountered in the existing sanitary sewer were cracked pipe and sags. WATER MAIN The water mains within the Pinetree Pond East Additions consist of 6, 8, and 12 -inch diameter ductile iron pipe. The mains were installed between 1979 and 1980. The water mains are believed to be in good condition. However, there are two valves, a six -inch and twelve -inch, which are not operational and will need to be addressed. STORM SEWER The existing storm sewer has been televised to determine pipe condition and necessary repairs. In addition, storm structures were also inspected. Storm sewer mains are generally in good condition. However, some problems encountered in the existing storm sewer were cracked or broken pipes and dirty lines. Miscellaneous structure patching, lining, replacement of steps, and other repairs were noted during the inspections. City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota 2013 Pavement Management Project Page 3 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS - DISCTRICT C2 STREETS The streets within District C2 are urban - residential and were originally constructed over a twelve year period between 1980 and 1992. The southwest corner of C2 was constructed in 1980 and the next development occurred eight years later. Generally, the streets are 32 feet wide (from face of curb to face of curb) with concrete curb and gutter. Jensen Avenue is classified as a collector roadway between 70''' Street and Indian Boulevard, as is Indian Boulevard from Jamaica Avenue to Keats Avenue (CSAH 19), and Joliet Avenue from 70 Street to Indian Boulevard. All three of these collector streets are approximately 44 feet wide (from face of curb to face of curb) with concrete curb and gutter. Indian Boulevard and Jensen Avenue are marked with a double yellow centerline and a white lane delineator on each side of the roadway for the purposes of parking and pedestrian/bike traffic. Indian Boulevard was also recently added to the City's Municipal State Aid (MSA) street system. A visual pavement condition inspection determined the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of these streets range from 40 -65. Pavements in the lower end of that range are considered, "Poor" to "Fair" and generally have major distress or a significant amount of load related distress. In contrast, the 1994 Pavement Management Plan depicted PCI's in the range of 71 -99. Since 1994, pavement condition has continued to deteriorate to the current levels. Figure 2 depicts the PCI rating at each street and Figure 3 depicts the age of the streets within the neighborhood. In addition, there are sections of existing curb and gutter that have settled, cracked, or have other defects that will require replacement. Appendix A contains some representative photos of the existing pavement condition. It was observed that the older developments typically have lower PCI ratings and greater amounts of damaged curb and gutter. Coring of the pavement was performed to determine the thickness of the existing street section. This information was used to design a recommended pavement section. From the cores, it can be seen that the average section consists of 3 -4 inches of bituminous over 5 inches of gravel. Cores 2 -17 showed no signs of stripping and were noted to be in good condition. Existing Street Section — District C2 No. Location Bituminous (in) Aggregate Base (in) 1 9056 Indian Boulevard 4" * 5 2 7332 Janero Avenue 3" 4" 3 7141 Jenner Lane 4" 3" 4 7238 Janero Avenue 3" 3 5 9226 73r Street 3" 4 6 7056 Jensen Avenue 4" 5" 7 7379 Jensen Avenue 3 -1/4" 6 8 9379 Indian Boulevard 3 -1/4" 5" 9 9410 Indian Boulevard Ct. 3 -1/4" 6 10 946872 nd Street 4-1/4" 3" 11 9484 71 Bay 3 -3/4" 4" City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota 2013 Pavement Management Project Page 4 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT 12 7036 Jocelyn Alcove 3 5-1/2" 13 7163 Jocelyn Avenue 3 -3/4" 6" 14 964572 nd Street 4-1/2" 6" 15 1 7129 Joliet Avenue 4" 6 16 9872 Indian Boulevard 4 -1/2" 5 -1/2" 17 7378 Jewel Avenue 3 -1/4" 5" * Low - Severity Asphalt Stripping Observed SANITARY SEWER The sanitary sewer system within the Pinetree Pond East Additions consists of 8 and 12 -inch VCP. There is also some 12 -inch RCP along Indian Boulevard between Jewel Avenue and Jocelyn Avenue. Sewer within the East Parkview 2 " Addition consists of 8 PVC. The existing sanitary sewer has been televised to evaluate pipe condition. The televising reports show that the pipe is in good condition. However, some problems encountered in the existing sanitary sewer were cracked pipe and some root intrusion. WATER MAIN The water mains within the Pinetree Pond East Additions consist of 6, 8, 12, and 18 -inch diameter ductile iron pipe. The mains were installed between 1980 and 1992. The water mains are believed to be in good condition. However, there are some minor repairs required such as replacing the top sections of some valves and extending hydrant barrels. STORM SEWER The existing storm sewer has been televised to determine pipe condition and necessary repairs. In addition, storm structures were also inspected. Storm sewer mains are generally in good condition. However, some problems encountered in the existing storm sewer were cracked or broken pipes and dirty lines. Some pipe segments had been pierced by private utilities and need to be repaired. Miscellaneous structure patching, lining, replacement of steps, and other repairs were noted during the inspections. EXISTING CONDITi IUNS - DISCTRICT C3 P1 1.11144 &1 The streets within District C3 were originally constructed in the early to mid 1990's. The streets are approximately 32 feet wide (from face of curb to face of curb) with concrete curb and gutter. The Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of these streets range from 55 -75. In contrast, the 1994 Pavement Management Plan depicted PCI's in the range of 99 -100 since they were new streets at the time. Current PCI ranges are classified as "Good" and "Very Good" according to the City's pavement management plan. Generally these pavements that have a significant level of both non -load related (Very Good) and load related distress (Good). Since 1994, pavement condition has continued to deteriorate and much of the pavements have significant distress. Figure 2 depicts the PCI rating for each street and Figure 3 depicts the age of the streets within the neighborhood. In addition, there are sections of existing curb and gutter that have settled, cracked, or have other defects that will require replacement. Appendix A contains some representative photos of the existing pavement condition. City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota 2013 Pavement Management Project Page 5 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT Coring of the pavement was performed to determine the thickness of the existing street section. This information was used to design a recommended pavement section. Existing Street Section — District C3 No. Location Bituminous (in) Aggregate Base (in) 1 7848 Jenner Avenue 3" * 5 2 7901 Jocelyn Avenue 3 -1/2" 6 3 950179" Street 4 -1/4" * 5" * Asphalt Stripping Observed From the cores, it can be seen that the average section consists of 3.5 inches of bituminous over 5 inches of gravel. Two of the three cores displayed degradation due to stripping, which is generally described as the separation of aggregate from the asphalt primarily due to moisture. The extent of the stripping found degrades the strength and durability of the pavement. SANITARY SEWER The sanitary sewer system within the Prestige Estates Additions primarily consists of 8 -inch PVC. The only exception to this is a section of 8 -inch ductile iron pipe off 80` Street extended north into Jocelyn Avenue. The existing sanitary sewer has been televised to evaluate pipe condition. The televising reports show that the pipe is in good condition and no repairs are anticipated. WATER MAIN The water mains within the Prestige Estates Additions consist of 6 -inch diameter ductile iron pipe. The mains were installed between 1990 and 1994. The water mains are believed to be in good condition, and therefore, no improvements are proposed. There is, however, a valve that is not operational that should be addressed. STORM SEWER The existing storm sewer has been televised to determine pipe condition and necessary repairs. In addition, storm structures were also inspected. Storm sewer mains are generally in good condition. However, some problems encountered in the existing storm sewer were cracked or broken pipes and dirty lines. Miscellaneous structure patching, lining, replacement of steps, and other repairs were noted during the inspections. PROP©SED IMPROVEMENTS - DISTRICT C1 Based on the deteriorated condition of the existing pavement and relatively good condition of the existing subgrade, the proposed rehabilitation method for the majority of the streets in District C1 consists of full pavement removal and replacement with 3.5 inches of new avement. The only exception would be the collector streets, 75 Street and Jeffery Avenue south of 75" Street. In an effort to increase the pavement section due to additional traffic associated with collector roadways, it is proposed to reclaim the existing pavement and gravel base to a depth of approximately 8 inches. The reclaimed material would then be salvaged, the subgrade would be excavated approximately 5.5 inches, and the salvaged reclaim material would then be re- spread and placed. The resultant reclaimed material would then be shaped and graded to allow for placement of 3.5 inches of non -wear and 1.5 inches of wearing course pavement. The wear City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota 2013 Pavement Management Project Page 6 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT course is proposed to be virgin mix, excluding the use of recycled asphalt pavement (RAP). Figure 4 depicts the improvements in this neighborhood. The existing D412 concrete curb and gutter has been evaluated. It is proposed that 100% of the curb and gutter be removed and replaced as a part of this project. Replacing all of the curb and gutter will: 1. Result in a more consistent product due to being machine laid versus hand poured 2. Produce a more uniform flow -line and improve drainage characteristics 3. Reduce the chance for differential settlement between panels 4. Restart the lifecycle of the curb, complimenting the adjacent new pavement Since the concrete curb is proposed to be replaced, the existing direct -bury street light wire is also proposed to be replaced within a PVC conduit. The City has recently experienced increased maintenance due to deterioration of the existing direct -bury wire as well as damage due to rodents. The new wire and conduit will require the installation of hand holes at every street light pole due to insufficient conduit size within the existing light pole base. Feed points have been inspected by City staff and have been found to need new cabinets and controllers. When curb and gutter is removed and replaced each driveway would be patched with in -kind materials as a part of the street rehabilitation process. Alternately, the homeowner could elect to receive a credit for the City - constructed driveway patch. With the credit, the homeowner would then be able to hire a private contractor and apply the credit towards a driveway repair of their choosing. Traffic signs are proposed to be replaced as a part of this project to meet federal retroreflectivity requirements. In addition, signs will be evaluated for conformance to the adopted City sign policy and signs will be removed or supplemented as required. SANITARY SEWER Inline repairs are recommended to address cracks within the pipe. Where there are sags with a history of back -ups, it is recommended that the pipe be removed and replaced. The sanitary sewer manhole castings will be salvaged and reinstalled. The existing concrete adjusting rings will be replaced with new HDPE adjusting rings to conform to current City standards. WATER MAIN It is proposed that the valves that are not operational be removed and replaced as a part of this project. Also, there are ten hydrants that should be adjusted. It is proposed to extend the hydrant barrel on each of these hydrants. Finally, concrete hydrant access pads are proposed to be installed at all hydrants in accordance with current City standards. STORM SEWER Generally speaking, the intent of this project is to rehabilitate the streets and not change existing drainage patterns. In -line repairs are recommended to address cracks, and leaking or offset joints. Structures in poor condition and adjusting rings will be replaced to conform to current city standards. Existing castings will be salvaged. Miscellaneous structure patching, lining, replacement of steps, and other repairs will be performed as needed. There have been some reports of localized ponding within the roadway at the corner of 79 Street and Janero Avenue. Deposits of sediment that were found in the downstream pipe were believed to be restricting flows and have recently been removed by Public Works. During some rain events homeowners have reported a significant amount of overland flow coming down Janero Avenue from the City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota 2013 Pavement Management Project Page 7 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT north. During final design, the addition of additional catch basins in an effort to get water into the storm pipes earlier will be evaluated. STORM WATER QUALITY Storm water quality improvements are not required in this neighborhood due to no increase of impervious surfacing. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS - DISTRICT C2 STREETS Due to the range of pavement ages within District C2, two primary rehabilitation methods are proposed, pavement replacement and mill - overlay. The streets within C2 that were constructed in 1980 are proposed to undergo a full pavement replacement. This is consistent with the proposed improvements in District C1 as both areas are of similar age, pavement condition, and construction materials of the time. The only exception to this is Indian Boulevard Court whose pavement and curb condition is better, presumably due to reduced traffic. Indian Boulevard from Jamaica Avenue to Jewel Avenue is showing a greater level of pavement distress due to additional traffic. It is therefore proposed to replace the full pavement section by reclaiming the existing pavement and gravel base to a depth of approximately 12 inches. The excess reclaimed material would then be hauled off -site. The resultant reclaimed material would then be shaped and graded to allow for placement of 3.5 inches of non -wear and 1.5 inches of wearing course pavement. The wear course is proposed to be virgin mix, excluding the use of recycled asphalt pavement (RAP). In the areas of full pavement replacement it is proposed that 100% of the curb and gutter be removed and replaced as apart of this project. Replacing all of the curb and gutter will: 1. Result in a more consistent product due to being machine laid versus hand poured 2. Produce a more uniform flow -line and improve drainage characteristics 3. Reduce the chance for differential settlement between panels 4. Restart the lifecycle of the curb, complimenting the adjacent new pavement Similar to District C1, where the full concrete curb removal and replacement occurs, the existing direct - bury street light wire is also proposed to be replaced within a PVC conduit as well as the installation of hand holes at every street light pole. Feed points have been inspected by City staff and have been found to need new cabinets and controllers. The proposed rehabilitation method in the remainder of C2 is to mill 1.5 inches of the existing bituminous pavement the entire width of the street, perform crack sealing and patching as needed on the remaining pavement, then pave 1.5 inches of new bituminous pavement. This method typically results in reflection of existing cracks in the new roadway surface within I to 2 years. Maintenance of the reflective cracks through a route and seal will be required which reduces moisture penetration and prevents further pavement breakup. In the mill- overlay areas, the existing concrete curb and gutter will be evaluated prior to construction. Based on a preliminary evaluation, it was estimated that approximately 18% is currently in poor condition and would need to be replaced. City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota 2013 Pavement Management Project Page 8 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT In locations where curb is replaced in front of driveways, curb will be removed and replaced and each driveway would be patched with in -kind materials as a pant of the street rehabilitation process. Alternately, the homeowner could elect to receive a credit for the City - constructed driveway patch. With the credit, the homeowner would then be able to hire a private contractor and apply the credit towards a driveway repair of their choosing. Traffic signs are proposed to be replaced as a part of this project to meet federal retroreflectivity requirements. In addition, signs will be evaluated for conformance to the adopted City sign policy and signs will be removed or supplemented as required. Specific roadway improvements due to the work proposed by the South Washington Watershed District (SWWD) is described in the section titled Storm Water Quality. SANITARY SEWER Inline repairs are recommended to address cracks within the pipe. Where there are sags with a history of back -ups, it is recommended that the pipe be removed and replaced. The sanitary sewer manhole castings will be salvaged and reinstalled. The existing concrete adjusting rings will be replaced with new HDPE adjusting rings conform to current City standards. WATER MAIN It is proposed that broken valve top sections be removed and replaced as a part of this project. Also, there are two hydrants that should be adjusted. It is proposed to extend the hydrant barrel on each of these hydrants. Finally, concrete hydrant access pads are proposed to be installed at all hydrants in accordance with current City standards. STORM SEWER Generally speaking, the intent of this project is to rehabilitate the streets and not change existing drainage patterns. In -line repairs are recommended to address cracks, and leaking or offset joints. Structures in poor condition will be replaced to conform to current city standards. Adjustment rings for manholes will be replaced with HDPE rings. Catch basin rings will not be replaced unless the curb adjacent to them is removed, or failure of the rings has occurred. The existing castings will be salvaged. Miscellaneous structure patching, lining, replacement of steps, and other repairs will be performed as needed. Public Works staff provided input on areas with historic drainage concerns. No major flooding or drainage issues were noted; therefore only minor curb grade modifications and valley gutter installations are proposed to facilitate drainage. Since Indian Boulevard has been designated a MSA route, the storm sewer system must meet the maximum allowable spread requirements set forth by MnDOT. These requirements will not apply to the mill - overlay area portion of Indian since it is not viewed as a reconstruction. Therefore, it is anticipated that a few additional catch basins will be required at two low points along Indian. STORM WATER QUALITY & SWWD The City initially proposed retrofit water quality improvements within pond ED -P5 in 2009 for a Clean Water Fund grant submittal for water quality improvement projects. The retrofit improvements are currently substantially completed and provide water quality treatment to a portion of the untreated watershed of pond ED -P5 adjacent to Kingston Park. City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota 2013 Pavement Management Project Page 9 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT Tied to those improvements are additional upstream improvements adjacent to 70' Street. Washington County is currently proposing grading for the South Washington Watershed District's (SW)ATD) Central Draw Storage Facility (CDSF) and construction of a piped outlet as a part of the proposed CSAH 22 /CSAH 19 (70 Street/Keats Avenue Improvement project). As a part of this project, a portion of the ultimate 72" outlet will be constructed for the CDSF. Until the ultimate outlet is complete, storm water from the CDSF will be routed down Joliet and Jocelyn Avenue to pond ED -P2.2. This will require the removal and replacement of storm sewer pipe under those roadways. In order to facilitate the installation of the new 30 -inch storm sewer pipe along Jocelyn, a new parallel sanitary sewer lateral is needed to serve the residents on the south side of the street. Sewer and water service pipes will be removed and replaced for these properties. Because of the utility work, it's proposed that the full pavement section along with curb and gutter be removed and replaced. In addition, it's anticipated that driveways and landscaping will be impacted to the right -of -way line. Figure 12 depicts the proposed improvements. The South Washington Watershed District (SW),VD) is partnering financially with the City to implement these water quality improvements and it's anticipated they will contribute a portion of the street and utility construction for the installation of the proposed storm sewer. Additional storm water quality improvements are not required in this neighborhood due to no increase of impervious surfacing. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS - DISTRICT C3 STREETS Due to the age of the pavement in District C3, it would typically be proposed to mill 1.5 inches of the existing bituminous pavement, perform crack sealing and patching as needed on the remaining pavement, then pave 1.5 inches of new bituminous pavement. However, due to the observed depth and extent of the existing pavement stripping, a mill and overlay is not recommended at this time. Currently, Mn/DOT's Office of Materials is leading a study to evaluate "Stripping of Hot Mixed Asphalt Pavements under Chip Seals." This study is scheduled to conclude in late 2012 and may provide some insight as to why the stripping is occurring on certain roads. In the meantime, City staff met with Mn/DOT to discuss the stripping in District C3. Numerous rehabilitation methods were discussed, including various forms of full pavement replacement. Rather than pursue full replacement at this time, the City has decided to monitor the deterioration until the pavement justifies a full replacement. District C3 is now tentatively scheduled for rehabilitation in the post -2016 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The existing concrete curb and gutter will be evaluated prior to the future rehabilitation. Based on a preliminary evaluation, it was estimated that approximately 15% is currently in poor condition and would need to be replaced. It should be anticipated that additional curb will need to be replaced in the future. SANITARY SEWER Since the televising has indicated the pipe is in good condition, no repairs were anticipated. The City may choose to reevaluate necessary repairs when the project moves forward. When the project moves forward, the sanitary sewer manhole castings will be salvaged and reinstalled. Any existing concrete adjusting rings will be replaced with new HDPE adjusting rings to conform to current City standards. City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota 2013 Pavement Management Project Page 10 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT WATER MAIN The water mains are believed to be in good condition, and therefore, no improvements were proposed. There is, however, a valve that is not operational. This repair can be handled as a general maintenance item if desired. When the project moves forward, concrete hydrant access pads are proposed to be installed at all hydrants in accordance with current City standards. STORM SEWER In -line repairs are recommended to address cracks, and leaking or offset joints. Structures in poor condition and adjusting rings will be replaced to conform to current city standards. Existing castings will be salvaged. Miscellaneous structure patching, lining, replacement of steps, and other repairs will be performed as needed. STORM WATER QUALITY Storm water quality improvements are not required in this neighborhood due to no increase of impervious surfacing. ALTERNATE BID STREETS The City could opt to obtain alternate bids to replace the traditional wearing course with an Ultra -Thin Bounded Wearing Course (UTBWC). Mn/DOT research document 2007 -18 states that nationwide research has shown that UTBWC reduces deterioration caused by weathering, oxidation, traffic and provides good skid resistance, reduced rolling noise, reduction of hydroplaning, and back spray from the roadway. UTBWC was introduced to Minnesota in 1999 and was first used on US -169 near Princeton. During the first seven years after constructing the UTBWC overlay, Mn/DOT reported no further maintenance activity with only some of the transverse cracks reflecting through; however, they were tight. If this alternate is pursued, the UTBWC would replace the proposed wearing course on both the mill - overlay and pavement replacement areas, with the exception of cul -de -sacs. At this time cul -de -sacs cannot be paved with this product so it's proposed that the UTBWC be used up to the neck of the cul -de- sac. The cul -de -sac bubble would then have the full pavement section replaced and would be subsequently fog sealed. It is anticipated that this alternate would reduce the amount of reflective cracking in the mill - overlay area and would improve performance versus the traditional wearing course. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS - KINGSTON PARK To be consistent with past City pavement management projects, parks within the pavement management district typically receive upgrades. Therefore several new improvements are proposed for Kingston Park, located east of 75 Street. PARKING LOTS & ACCESS DRIVE The proposed rehabilitation method for the main Kingston Park parking lot consists of full pavement removal and replacement with 3.5 inches of new pavement. The addition of curb and gutter was determined to be cost prohibitive due to the existing flat grades and the resulting grading and drainage issues that would arise. Storm sewer improvements are also proposed adjacent to the existing parking lot. City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota 2013 Pavement Management Project Page I 1 203.' PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT Since the access drive appears to be in better condition, it's proposed to mill 1.5 inches of the existing bituminous pavement, perform crack sealing as necessary on the remaining pavement, then pave 1.5 inches of new bituminous pavement. In addition, six posts with electrical outlets are proposed to be added at the perimeter of the parking lot. Figure 11 depicts the proposed park improvements. TRAILS Bituminous trails are also proposed to be constructed within Kingston Park. Costs for various options are presented in the table below. Trail segments within Kingston Park are shown on Figure 11. Trail Cost Summary —Kingston Park Segments Location Estimated Costs Segment 1 $54,888.73 Segment 2 $25,906.88 Segment 3 $13,949.97 Segment 4 $31,137.05 Segment 5 $52,449.42 Segment 6 $11,870.82 Total: $190,202.87 Costs presented include 10% contingency + 30% indirect costs ACCESSORY ITEMS The existing tennis and basketball courts currently display some cracking. Previous route and seal maintenance has been met with limited success. Despite the cracking, the remaining portions of the surface appear to be in good condition. Rather than pursue a full surface replacement at this time, a crack repair is recommended that will not be included in this contract. Other proposed amenities within the park include: • Curb around existing play area • Trash receptacles & Benches • Planting of trees • Gazebo Structure (with picnic table) PARK IMPROVEMENT COST SUMMARY Estimated Park Improvements Location Estimated Costs Trail Segments 1 -6 $190,202.87 Access Drive Rehabilitation $29,465.15 Existing Parking Lot Rehabilitation $242,482.96 Accessory Features $63,134.50 Subtotal: $525,285.48 Costs presented include 10% contingency + 30 %o indirect costs City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota 2013 Pavement Management Project Page 12 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PERMITS AND EASEMENTS Because the roadway construction is considered a maintenance project that would not create any new impervious surfaces and would not change the existing grade, hydraulics, or purpose of the roadway, the Phase II General Storm Water Permit from the MPCA would not be required for that portion of the work. However, since the project is proposed to include extensive trail construction and new impervious areas, the project will trigger the need for the Phase II Storm Water Permit. This project will require the following permits: • Phase II General Storm Water Permit from the MPCA No additional drainage and utility easements are anticipated in the neighborhoods, however, this will be evaluated during the final design phase of the project. ESTIMATED COSTS Cost estimates for the improvements have been prepared and are included in the Appendix of this report. All costs for items to be constructed are based on anticipated unit prices for the 2013 construction season. All costs include a thirty (30) percent allowance for indirect costs associated with the project (engineering, administrative, financing, and legal) as well as a ten (10) percent contingency. No costs are included for capitalized interest during the construction period or before assessments are levied. Following is an overall summary of the estimated costs: Estimated Cost Summary Location Estimated Project Cost Pavement Replacement District CI-Pavement Replacement $3,154,788.78 District C2- Pavement Replacement $559,503.95 Indian Blvd - Pavement Replacement $750,588.05 Mill Overlay District C2 Mill Overlay $2,226,918.02 Indian Blvd -Mill Overlay $444,895.24 District C3 - Kingston Park Improvements $525,285.48 Total Estimated Project Cost: $7,661,979.52 Costs presented include 10 % contingency + 30% indirect costs Because District C3 is proposed for rehabilitation post -2016, no costs are presented above. COST ALLOCATION Assessments for this project will be based upon the "Infrastructure Maintenance Task Force Special Assessment Policy For Public Improvements," dated September 30, 2005, Revised August 8, 2012. All City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota 2013 Pavement Management Project Page 13 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT adjacent benefiting properties are proposed to be assessed. Per the Urban Residential policy, 45% of the project cost for both surface and subsurface improvements would be assigned to each individual residential lot on a unit basis. The intent of the City's policy is to treat all properties within a residential development as similar individual units regardless of lot frontage. The amount assessed is based on the City standard street section even if the width is greater. City funds would be responsible for the remaining 55% of the project costs. The 80 multi - family properties in District C2 (pavement replacement area) were assigned a Residential Buildable Lot Equivalent (RBLE) with the following calculation per the policy: 80 units x 0.6 = 48 RBLE Per the policy, City -owned property was evaluated in the same manner as commercial/industrial lots where 100% of the project costs adjacent to the property are assessed. School property followed the Religious Institutions /School Land Use policy where 75% of the project costs are apportioned based on the front footage of the street being improved. In areas where residential property was on the opposite side of the street of either the City or school property, half of the street width was assigned to the residential area and the other half to either the City or the school property. The estimated project assessments are as follows: CITY -OWNED PROPERTY: Estimated Cost Allocation Abutting City Property Total Street Cost Estimated City Location Street Adjusted Adjacent to City Property Assessment School Property Costs* ($ /10 Footage ** (11) Property (100 % of Total) C1— Pavement Replacement $277.61 313 $86,890.65 $86,890.65 C2 — Pavement Replacement $255.99 212 $54,270.05 $54,270.05 C2 —Mill & Overlay $152.42 139.5 $21,262.13 $21,262.13 Totals: I I 1 $162,422.83 * Total Project Cost, includes Street & Utilities ** Includes 50% reduction for property on one side of the street SCHOOL PROPERTY: Estimated Cost Allocation Abutting School Total Street Cost Estimated School Location Street Property Adjacent to School Property Property Costs* ($ /lf) Adjusted School Assessment Special Benefit Footage ** (b) property (75% of Total) Appraisal C2 —Mill & Overlay $152.42 1473.5 $224,586.04 $168,439.53 $78,900.00 Totals: I I 1 1 $168,439.53 $78,900.00 * Total Project Cost, includes Street & Utilities ** Includes 50% reduction for property on one side of the street City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota 2013 Pavement Management Project Page 14 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT URBAN RESIDENTIAL LAND USE: Estimated Cost Allocation Location Other Funds Assessed Amount (45% of Total) Estimated Project Cost Special Benefit Appraisal CI &C2— Pavement Replacement $2,896,526.28 $1,568,354.49 $4,464,880.78 C2 — Mill & Overlay $1,886,040.32 $785,772.94 $2,671,813.27 Kingston Park $525,285.48 - $525,285.48 Totals: $5,307,852.08 $2,354,127.44 $7,661,979.52 * See Appendix C for Fund Breakout. Includes City, School & SWWD funds Estimated Cost Per Unit Location Assessable RBLE Units Assessed Amount o (45 /a of Total) Assessed Cost Per PBLE Unit Per Policy Special Benefit Appraisal C1& C2— Pavement Replacement 385* $1,568,354.49 $4,073.65 Single Family. $4,073.65 $5,000.00 Multi Family: $2,444.19 $1,600.00 C2 — Mill & Overlay 320 $785,772.94 $2,455.54 Single Family. $2,455.54 $2,500.00 * Includes 48 equivalent units for multi - family housing Per the assessment policy, the 80 multi - family properties in the District C2 pavement replacement area would be assigned a cost of: 48 RBLE x $4,073.65 = $195,535.11 $195,535.11 / 80 units = $2,444.19 However, due to the special benefit appraisal, the multi - family assessments are proposed to be capped at $1,600. City funds will cover the difference between the calculated assessment and the benefit appraisal. It's anticipated that the SWWD will participate in the additional costs for replacing the roadway surface and curbing, installation of new storm and sanitary sewer, and additional restoration and landscaping costs adjacent to the pipe work they're proposing in area C2. As seen in Appendix C, these additional costs are deducted from the project prior to calculating the assessments above. Estimated project costs for the UTBWC Alternate can also be seen in Appendix C. The costs identified in the table below summarize the additional impact to each assessable property with the alternate. City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota 2013 Pavement Management Project Page 15 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT UTBWC Alternate - Estimated Cost Impact Location Assessable RBLE Units Additional Amount Assessed Additional Cost Per RBLE Unit Hold Neighborhood Meeting • 01/16/2013 Council Receives and Approves Feasibility Report C1& C2— Pavement Replacement 385* $90,063.97 $233.93 C2 —Mill & Overlay 320 $53,686.84 $167.77 School Property - $5,271.33 - * Includes 48 equivalent units for multi - family housing FINANCING Assessments are proposed to be levied based on the City's current assessment policy. MSA funds will be utilized on all actual participating construction costs on Indian Boulevard. The remainder of the project would be financed through a combination of City funds such as the General Tax Levy and Enterprise funds for items such as storm sewer improvements. General Levy funds will be utilized for the proposed park improvements. Figures 7 & 8 depict the assessable parcels for the project. PUBLIC HEARING Because the properties within the project area benefit from the proposed improvements, and the project will be partially funded through assessment, it will be necessary for the City to hold a public improvement hearing to receive comment on the proposed project and to determine further action to be taken. PROJECT SCHEDULE Below is the proposed schedule assuming starting construction in 2013: • 08/08/2012 Council Orders Feasibility Report • 01/02/2013 Council Workshop • 01/08/2013 Hold Neighborhood Meeting • 01/16/2013 Council Receives and Approves Feasibility Report Council Sets a Public Improvement Hearing Date 0 02/20/2013 Council Holds Public Improvement Hearing Council Orders the preparation of the Plans and Specifications 0 03/20/2013 Council Approves the Plans and Specifications • 04/18/2013 Project Bid Date • 05/01/2013 Contract Award • Spring 2013 Begin Construction • October 2013 Complete Construction • September 2013 Council sets Assessment Hearing Date • October 2013 Council holds Assessment Hearing City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota 2013 Pavement Management Project Page 16 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that this report be used as a guide for the layout, design, and cost allocation for the public improvements. It is further recommended that the owners of properties within the project limits be notified of the proposed improvements in order to provide comment. To determine project feasibility, a comparison was made between the costs estimated herein and the costs experienced for other similar projects within the City. These comparisons, on a per linear foot construction cost basis (no indirect project costs), are shown in the following table: Cost per Unit Comparison 2013 Pavement Management Project (Estimated) District C1 & District C2 — Pavement Replacement Area $150.39 District C2 — Mill & Overlay Area $99.65 2011 Pavement Management Project (Bid Results) Pine Coulee/Countrywood $68.49 Howard's Addition $63.18 2010 Pavement Management Project - River Acres (Bid Results) $69.14 2008 Pavement Management Project (Bid Results) $96.00 From the tabulation above, it can be seen that the cost to rehabilitate in the pavement replacement areas are higher than the costs from the 2011 Pavement Management Project. This is primarily due to the fact that this project includes streets with concrete curb and gutter and public sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and water main repairs. In addition, the street widths are significantly wider than the rural residential streets from 2010 and 2011. In 2008, the bid result listed above did not include sanitary and storm sewer repairs or full curb replacement. The remaining C2 area has costs typical with a mill - overlay rehabilitation project with spot curb replacement. The project is financially feasible, with funding sources identified from the City as well as the benefited properties adjacent to the project. Financial responsibilities have been determined based on estimated project costs as well as adopted City policy. From an engineering standpoint, this project is feasible, necessary, and cost effective. City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota 2013 Pavement Management Project Page 17 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT Appendix Existing Pavement Condition Photos Cottage J Grove 1phere Pride and?Vos perlty Meet City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota 2013 Pavement Management Project 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT District Cl Approximate Location: Jeffery Ave. 200' north of Janero Ave. Curb damage observed with cracked and chipped panels. Settlement and poor drainage also present. District C1 Approximate Location: Jeffery Ave. 200' north of Janero Ave. Pavement has much distress and is beyond an overlay. Full pavement replacement is recommended. City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota 2013 Pavement Management Project 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT District C1 Approximate Location: Jeffery Avenue and 75 Street intersection Patching of the bituminous pavement has occurred. Load - related cracking in the wheelpath is visible. L City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota 2013 Pavement Management Project District Cl Approximate Location: 75"' St. near Jeffery Ave. Curb damage is visible. 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT District C1 Approximate Location: Janero Court Extensive block cracking is present and the effect of pavement aging is evident. City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota 2013 Pavement Management Project District C1 Approximate Location: Janero Court Alligator cracking due to pavement fatigue is present. 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT District C1 Approximate Location: 79 t1i Street at Janero Avenue Pavement fatigue is visible by severe block cracking and alligator cracking within the wheelpath. City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota 2013 Pavement Management Project District Cl Approximate Location: Jeffery Avenue at Janero Avenue Small block cracking and alligator cracking in wheelpath. 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota 2013 Pavement Management Project District Cl Approximate Location: 7401 Jeffery Lane Intermediate -size block cracking is visible. District C2 Approximate Location: 7375 Janero Avenue Some longitudinal cracks are present, block cracking is beginning. 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT District C2 Approximate Location: 9149 73 Avenue Large block cracking is present, with more pavement distress adjacent to multi- family homes. K City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota 2013 Pavement Management Project District C2 Approximate Location: 7237 Janero Avenue Irregular block cracking. 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota 2013 Pavement Management Project District C2 Approximate Location: 7157 Jenner Lane Transverse (thermal) cracking with subsequent block cracking present. District C2 Approximate Location: 7251 Jensen Avenue Minor rutting in wheelpath, transverse cracks have been sealed. 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT District C2 Approximate Location: Joliet Avenue & Jocelyn Avenue facing South Longitudinal cracking at paving joints are not load- related. Past crack filling was performed. District C2 City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota 2013 Pavement Management Project Approximate Location: 7363 Joliet Avenue Block cracking with few open cracks. 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT District C2 )n. City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota 2013 Pavement Management Project Approximate Location: Joliet Circle 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota 2013 Pavement Management Project District C3 Approximate Location: 7848 Jenner Avenue Stripping of the seal coat is evident in the surface pavement. District C3 Approximate Location: 7721 Jocelyn Avenue Patching of the bituminous pavement has occurred. 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT Appendix 6 Figures M e Cottage Grove 'here Pride a,,,Qrosperlty Meet City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota 2013 Pavement Management Project � MEN ml Mom MM Lim. T-mm Imms mmm -m � M.- :.. i M -a MEN 4% wo N, W .. m IVA Sam Ell ( omplift City ...- = =- R. MINNESO 2013 PAVEMENT Minnesota MANAGEMENT PROJECT C PAVEMENT IND EX �,.�: i�i��" ������� � � I��11 ..:. ��� 'fir► �i�i1l� :: �� : j� ■ �i \1IN1 �. -111 � .. �1' .� �► . • � -,. .���� �� �� a �. �'� �'�i�Q� 1���1►! a ,. ■fi■ � :: __ .. 11111■ee�ee� t� Ase -4 �� •,- err■ �- __ " ■ ; / �� I�,�r,� �11► /11' �` / �, ; *�/1 �►,, IIA�II 1i ;ice ��s� �► i 1� B i i , n ass. ��' Wit! �� ■ ►��► � I♦ WE mom Ii i 1 I NKI �M �= N � � 1 ��, �I,/::I - � ,�, ,� ♦ �►I'7� i� ■1 � IA1AI IAAIAAfi■ii■���■ ■■ . �! �� �• �� e� •-� � �� a '�� �e.�� �, . .� �,• � �IIiA■ �I gloom 11 O �� ���� ■ \�IAA� ■i ii i �■ ■� , ♦nut �r S � .. N ��� ■W�'��► �I ��. . Cily of Cottage Grove _ - - Con-ItIng ngin am & S—y— 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROJECT minnewic MA—. MN �� IR�NTMNSMPYEY�MNWI�M�,MNBURN��MN MN RAMSK MN MAP—, MN BRAI—, MN "K IA STREETS - YEAR CONSTRUCTED FIGURE 3 Agov, Arm law Irk logoA1 -. • �■�11■ ,.� !IB i13 KR 1� - � 4 1tl a• µv �� vim w ■Ir C �®r �! * ■1111! �� ��■ ■���■� =':� -� ■��� �� p 114M m Fig �,►��11��i�.�■ �1► . I91■ ■m �: ���■ �,� :I�r� � �, '� t®►1�'�� ���■ � � ��111111111111■■■■■111■ ■■ �j/��`,` � ��� ■1111.111111■ ■`r � ■ � '� � ♦o:� � � '1� `� � ■1111■ � .rIA I I�I� 111 � /�• �I �IAS�� � � * �■■■■ ■■ �■■� III��.■■ ■�� ■�.�� �►��.� �u�.. ��:' . II o - � q J 747 I. PAVEMENTDISTRI BOUNDARVO / PAVEMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARYCS INDIANBLVD. 50. LEGEND • RAISE HYDRANT 1 I SH . _<\� �< REP LA C !J I \ \ \ \ J �� • TOP SECTION �LJ: \ / h SERV CE I ¢ \\ \� / I • SANITARYSEWER; ADD 1- FT BARREL SECTION SAN'ARYSEWER: / \ / SAN rTARYSEWER: REPAIR L—', �- I \ � \ SANRARYSEWER: �\ \ AL REMOVE& REPLACE50'SEGMENT SANITARY SEWER: / v \ a\ PAVEMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY C3 .� 141 / CHEM I CAL ROOT TREATMENT / 1 /� STORM SEWER: 4' CIPP REPAIR STORM S EWER: GASKET 7 9T. B . � � � °� �. • 11TH Cllyof nm Am A� E30LTON 8c MENK, 1NC. COTTAGEGROVE,MINNESOTA C otta g e Grave HDRR ® /II11 DND,BI,IDe ED9IDeeTa SBrvaYOT. PEEr b 4 MAN —,Mx raIAMDrMNMEPYMMNWIUMAn ,MNeuxxsuiuT, MN 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROIECf Minnesota a VMA MN RAMI MN MAPLEPAOD, MN BRAINERD. MN AMM, IA UTILITY REPAIRS (Cl & C3) FIGURES � —, 7DTH sr. so. 1 I 1 Bvs. _ I ' I LEGEND � L �p ,,, • RAISE HYDRANT d 73 • REPLACE VALVE C 1 NN R 1 50, q `�� REPLACE TOP • SECTION FROZEN SERVICE / a -�`_ 72ND I SANITARYSEWER: j • ADD 1-FT BARREL SECTION NE o ��';'� r so. b• ST. s, `' 4 SANITARY SEWER: s. 4' CIPP REPAIR SANTARY SEW ER: REMOVE & REPLACE SO' SEGMENT SANITARY SEWER: CHEMICAL ROOT TREATMENT ,y �II y ` \ STORM SEWER: • '� ✓, 4' OPP REPAIR ` REMOVE LDOSE GASKET IT to 7aTN I ^ 9 _ - PAVEMENT DISTRI BOUNDARY CL / \ PAVEMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY «— INDIAN BLVD.$ _ Cllyof C otta g e Grove <� N0P1L ® AA 130LT'ON a� MI= LEVC_ III, Oo���I,IDB EDBIDear9 & 5—Yo,: COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA Minnesota MAxraro 'AixI.nxT,M—wEYE,NUwiurnNt NrveunxswuC Nry 2013 PAVEMENTMANAGEMENTPROJECf UTILITY REPAIRS (U) FIGURE6 V auKA Mx RA —,Mx —U OD, MN BRAINUD, Mx A—, IA � W 0 0 I � L' r I I FTTT - FT - 71 ran City of Aaq A� AIA E30LTC)N ac MENK, INC. C otta g e Grove Hoam o ® /III µK C— aWtio9 EL =e P= & Su—y— / AIO.MNNAI MN MAP ,MN LN4N ON AMB,IA Mlnnesold M dASK0. MN MMSLY, MN MAPLEMOOD. MN OgAINERO, MN AMES, IA LEGEND RESIOENNAL u cm PROPEam SCHOOL PgOPERO' COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROJECT 1 70H S7, I SO. � ` J334 7318 )310 09n JWa u n ]Dss ]ass ]IW ]D m 9410 U 8/309414 943 8136 7Cfl 061 ) ]D01 , 7036 ]010 JOW )OW _ m 7- ]040 Jm9 nJ0 )m6 .— W9 BAY m0 31 )OW m ) )030 ]056 )O61 ( W6 I m ]336 ]lm 7W0 2 nm )Dt6 O 9194 94]6 91 > 1W4 ]015 ]OW )OW )Oba �Wp,U06034 ]53 ) 9166 ]On mee 94W mW 91 6 n42 ? )198 ]Sn' -. ]m6 1W6 Ogg lOCF(YN ]W3 109 019 OW 7033 m W2 nm �E/YNar >W0 ]093 .ri 0464 ]]SI 1 1 N, 5. 71St met m 9Y 1381 7tH ]SW J15a 0, .. 9496 9198 )160 1051 ]wf11] � 71d 93)5 In nn )u1 n mn JSW ]S1q 4(C ]Om ]042 ]045 ti )146 )I2x 7m7 )DU 7- p ]SW OC(, )1Y ]ll0 ]U3 051 ,146 Q )in ( ) 111 gg flw )2)1 ggs ]106 7159 >t)6 9]81B3m 9n] 96m )in ]16 e 4Y 11)t 1 3]6 716 nW ,D73 Mm ]163 I 338 32 n n11 7U2 8]W 936 Tl9D JA NEROgV 71]5 93n ,18, E J. 71W riw )ln n80 �� �� ]3m hO n06 )]Np 91 m3a 64 9483 9496 - 7]91 1 7189 9 5d )191 95 95U 95)6 y 9nD 9598 6 9634 fig 9Jm >n6 n55 49 43 297 )}39 )I19 ) n n36 n]1 Jz n 50. f3W � 9104 71m 7151 9]'99391 7366 n61 16 9 9136 94W )1W 9559 9601 9689 gmg mn In � fl93 193 9314 93]6 923D 9114 9156 9211 xa8 mU 9156 )ifl 95 95W 7319 541 9565 ggxg 9645 986) mli ] n91 n93 \ flm �a e� flv nn �-' nm flW 73RDSf.40. nW B4W mW 7121 )253 4 Y( v n l6s ]ms nW J3Y n I nm m,y3, 9m5 Ug 91m ,� h w n " ? grvry a 9 n3J m fll0 flTi wR nm)]m `9/� ]LS )253 �� ngD J3J5 \ 9W ry ry Arv ro rv ry +� 6 rj 94m 7]36 fl35 ry W nv 9111 x58 `r nm ]OCE\. 1313 flP n59 >m4 nss fl6 91W bb m 9110 BSU N' ry +T ry ¢ ]3A 9996 94W I � M ,365 )356 SI \ 9959 9xW m96 S 9410 fl)8 � n63 I )1W fl41 6, n]9 eW] 9ua 7400 mea - Bass n9e n99 n 91W 91v J4W )n3 ]4D7 nn n l is )tm nsD )4m n39 nl ,p I \ 91m D128 ry p er. _ 7av 93m lam ]a41 p i \ 91 9156 93BD s 4 )419 ti v 74W 9m1 9560 95 g ]439 ,irvb a ]n•+ I \ 5U] BGII 9611 B3Jfi I �4@ )� 91451W �rv,p ry>N 1 � �' ry a ^, � • I )tss B1Bl AT .�¢ ,3 q � '" ry �( �' W 3]9 - 9439 9U1 59161 n9am Pt1a 7411 9U0 A 9 \ �Q \P m95m48 � 7nl 91m 9311 4 I � 9504 mal 90]6 5525 9fiW am 50. I ]m3� 9225 9358 9]fl9 91m93W �j` 0 9WG Q LEGEND rfrr ]�L40 7 m1 PAL - 1459 PAVEMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY Cl sa )481 \ 74 . 9]5C--.,-- \ CMOPE- R )aLi >4W 91]0 n6 \ \ 9n4 )a697 08/n SCHOOL RIDPEPtt 74 )a 9140 PAVEMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY I IryA BN 6 ¢ )469 7484 93m W \ 9000 DS )498. 98 � 7487 �� \ \ 7 H ST. SO. S. )Sm )m) \ 7517 ]Sn 9I7`.. 9gDi 9Dri BOU Om ]SW ]507 \ nxL )551 \ 1533 75U ]SSD ]6W 591. JSBa ]563 7571 \ 7564 JSm \ \ ]Sn •ion .5... \ Cllyof Cotta Grove D° m 3 ulF 655r MENK, I BOLTON 84. INC_ -- CDDBNI2IDg EDgln —, & S—yDr9 OTA C PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT OTTAGEGROVE,MINNES 1013 Minnesota _.,MNENPMCN].MNSUX YEYE,MNWIUU0Aµ MNBURNWU4MN OIA MNPAMMMNMAPLL D.MNBRAIN6M.MNAMa,IA ASSESSABLE PARCELS (C2) FIGURE yy W a O 6 a PAVEMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY tiL a] \ \ 75TH Sr. 50, \ \ S \ 555 \ \ \ tL a a \ \\ C� � L11LI 1 J \ \ PAVEMENT DIARICf BOUNDARY C3 \ o \ \\ r 5 2 nea G 6 \ \ i ]RM SE. 50. JEFFERY CE I E — — I 75TH ST. $0. \ I — r IC-�� OTH ST. SO. 7—F7�a `7t+ Clly of o ¢m Am BN &, MEN K, 1 NC_ COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA ( COttO GrOVe Hoam ® �� OLTO cenawNn En9lneera & sR e z se�u: °�' I v } 1 EYE,- wnu.�wn, MN euxNSnu¢, M 2DI3 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROIECf MA-10. MN rAIRMDW.. MN SLEerr EYE, NIII'1f12S010 CHASID, MN R-, MN MAPLE D. MN RRAINERp MN AMES IA PAVE M E N T CO R E LOCATI 0 NS (Cl R C2) FIGURE 9 / ........ �- H / m B BA m Tl tff m 71ST � ' 0. J <yNq(C ��BqY a I -NEROAVE. S, A 72ND � SD hN0 SO. 50. \ Y B 73RD Q�. 50. 2 N0`yo I 7 77 Oli�Oq I B /� r o I \\ I 0 I yD N I � < S I1AxP � 50. T� r � 9 J a PAVEMENT DISTRIC T BOUNDARY C2 \� / a \\ � r - I PAVEMENT DISTAICTBOUNDARY Cl / 19MN B�LVO`S 9x81 \ 75TH ST, S0. \ I Q \ Z \ C \ \ \ /,/ , \ PAVEM ENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY 0 City of C otta g e Grove xaP Aao HORIZ ® AIII) /I BOLTON 8.. MENK, INC_ CO-U.M B Engineers & S—y... COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT Minnesrola Su�E FEET MAxvaro. Mx PAIAMDNL MUS�BEPr cr3.Mx wIUMeR, MN augxsMUC, MN PROJECT PA EM ENT CORE LOCATIONS (Q) FIGURE 10 GN NA MN RAMSFY, MN MAPt6w0D, MN BMINBBD, MN AM6, IA I � 70TH ST N v J° CE _ + ` y � t t'Y14��.. .�- p1 '!D �. p4k4Y N . uViG,� 1 x :.31 !A•"A.7 c' �y S {TI L I,;: � c ' Tf c !l ► � i 7 . ,, � � �, .. d it �_� y �� +• J .: , , 4 .^ . e �x 4 }T� J � a �� ♦._ A {•� � i.: r ^ I i : � J .. r _ ^•� 1� -� „SLli � ��rAh � � � �". "��`�4 .q:.4. �� _��_ f � .�1s � ,� I,� ��I � •� _ ����� _ t , 1 C , r Zc t� V Utz^ r � L �• � J4 Y I f q < .a f•+�\ r} f 7N 72ND ST 7 . Iona 1` City of E30 LTON 8c MENK, INC_ COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA Cotta Grove NDR¢ ® /' CDD=Mli,� Ercal -- & S— 1013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROJE ul: FEET MnxK am ,MN'- DWMNn¢nYEMMNW— AMN8URN —,Mx CT Minnewlo OU5 NRAM ,MNMAPLfWDOD,MNBRAINMMN -,IA SWWD CDSF IMPROVEMENTS FIGURE 12 ✓ t• - 9117 JILL 7337 1�f 913 7384 4 � 7375 \ l r Asia _ REVISED CENTERLINE F S / ` INDIAN BLVD. S0. a ' `•� • \ •��. 9102 \\ 9013 .! t• >'' •. 9108 lik— m - AlaL 5097 lit Cty of o R aR AIA BOLTC•N sa MENK, INC. COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA Cotta Grove " ° "' ® ,W1 c°n :uui�a Engl -- x S.—y— z suEE Fern d m�Nenro, mN FAIR— ,M "siaP— ,MNwluiuw,M— RNW4"e N 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROJECT WlTmsola aASKa MN RAmsEr, MN MAPiemw°, mN eRUNU°, MN aMts.0 INDIAN BOULEVARD REALIGNMENT FIGURE 13 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT Appendix C Cost Estimate Summary Cottage J Grove here Meet pride and P rosperity City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota 2013 Pavement Management Project SOME= go 0 �imillilmi� EMEREM =Mrs= � mmommomm mmmm7m� �mdmrFjmTj7n mmmvmm� EMBIOMM mmwm"mmmff;RR= mmm wmmgfmnm�� ��Vwmmlwpwmm NONE= mmmmmmmmmwmm� wmmrft.T� mmlmmml� mwmwn� MINEC993M �Mmmffxmmmm—m wmmmmmm�=� IMMEMZIM� mmmmgml�� sommirm2m IIIIIIIIN � MMMWM=71 ONNIMM somomm 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT Appendix D Preliminary Assessment Roll M s Cottage Grove %ere Pride ana4rosperity Meet City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota 2013 Pavement Management Project Preliminary Assessment Roll District C1 & C2 Pavement Replacement Parcel ID District Owner Address Units $ /Unit Total /Unit 1002721230032 C1 LEANO ALFRED 9170 75TH ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230033 C1 LARSON KENNETH C & PAQUIN 9140 75TH STS 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230034 C1 MILLER DAVID ALLEN & SUSAN M 7481 JEFFERY LN 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230035 Cl KRAMER CHARLIE M 7469 JEFFERY LN 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230036 Cl GRUDLEEVERETTJ 7457 JEFFERY LN 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230037 Cl RICHARD JAMES W & JENNINGS & KIMBERLY A JENNINGS 7449 JEFFERY LN 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230038 Cl ELLIOTT AMY D 7443 JEFFERY LN 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230039 Cl LACASSE KENNETH P JR & AMELIA 7437 JEFFERY LN 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230040 Cl NG CHUNG YIN & FLING YEE 7431 JEFFERY LN S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230041 Cl GAUGHAN DAVID 7421 JEFFERY LN 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230042 Cl DOHENY MICHAEL D & MARY T 7411 JEFFERY LN S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230043 Cl THOMPSON SHARILYN G 7401 JEFFERY LN 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230044 Cl FINCH JULIE A 7400 JEFFERY LN 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230045 Cl HALLETT CATHERINE A & LISLE P & P L LISLE 7410 JEFFERY LN 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230046 Cl FISCHER JEROME B 7420 JEFFERY LNS 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230047 Cl DEMMATHOMASJ 7430 JEFFERY LN 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230048 Cl HUNSBERGER MARTIN S & GLORIA M HUNSBERGER 7440 JEFFERY LN 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230049 C1 NELSEN THERESA C 7452 JEFFERY LN 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230050 C1 DAVIS ANN M 7462 JEFFERY LN 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230051 Cl NESS BRUCE A & WENDY E 7474 JEFFERY LN 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230052 Cl ODEN JOHN ERIK & TERHELL & KRISTINE LYNN TERHELL 7438 JEFFERY LN 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230053 Cl GURROLA HARRY R & CRISTINA G 7444 JEFFERY LN S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230054 Cl KAPSH WILLIAM D & ANITA L 7458 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230055 Cl BERNARD SANDRA L 7466 JEFFERY LN 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230056 Cl ERICKSON KEITH R & MICHELE A 7476 JEFFERY LN 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230057 Cl TIBBITS JOSHUA & JOANN 7473 JEFFERY LN 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230058 Cl CHAPMAN LISA G 7461 JEFFERY LN 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230059 Cl FLATTUM CYNTHIA C 7459 JEFFERY LN 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230060 Cl GALLES MICHELLE L & MICHAELJ MAXWELL 7441 JEFFERY LN 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230061 Cl DOHENY KURT M & LAURIE J 7429 JEFFERY LN 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721310003 C1 LINDBLOM TIMOTHY A & SHERI 1 7733 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320001 C1 BARRIENTES JASON R & SHEILA M 7657 JENSEN AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320002 C1 KRITZKY DONALD R 1R & LINDA C 7667 JENSEN AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320003 C1 SCHYMA HILARY W & CONNIE J SCHYMA 7677 JENSEN AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320004 Cl MATTHEWS DANIEL L & KRISTIN C 7729 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320005 Cl FUGG TRACY L 900175TH STS 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320006 Cl HARDECKE CLINTON & ANGELA C D 902175TH ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320007 Cl LEWANDOSKI KATHLEEN M 9043 75TH STS 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320008 C1 DOHERTY PATRICK 1 & ANGELA M 9067 75TH ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320009 C1 TOWNSEND STEPHEN J & MARY B 7508JASMINEAVES 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320010 C1 FERGUSON COREY L & HEIDI A 7532 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320011 C1 VANG SHOUA 7564 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320012 C1 MOUA SEESOK & GE XIONG 7586 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320013 C1 LEVOIR CHARLES 1 7594 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320014 C1 RUSSELLJEFFERY A & DEBBIE L 7602 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320015 C1 CHRISTIANSEN PHILLIP D 7610 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320016 C1 LUNDIN ERIKA 7618 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320017 C1 FARLEY BARBARA J 7626 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320018 C1 EILEK THERESA ANN 7634 JASMINE AVES 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320019 C1 PRIDGEN DARRELL M & DEBRA A 7642 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320020 C1 LOWE TODD D & STEPHANIE A 7652 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320021 Cl RICHIE LAWRENCE J & LINDA A 7676JASMINEAVES 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320022 Cl SPEARS MELVIN J & SUSAN J 7680 JASMINE AVES 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320023 Cl DELMORE BRIAN & ALDRICH B & BARBARA A ALDRICH 7684 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320024 Cl ETOLL REGINA M 7688 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320025 Cl SWAIM RICHARD M & AMY 7692 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320026 Cl KIMLINGER DARLENE E 7696 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320027 Cl ZIEGELMANN THEODORE & CHRISTINE A ZIEGELMANN 7700 JASMINE AVES 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320028 Cl FRANCIS JOSEPH RAYMOND 7704 JASMINE AVES 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320029 Cl STROMBERG MICHELE M & ROGER D 7708 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320030 Cl MEYER KEVIN X & CYNTHIA C 7710 JASMINE AVES 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320031 Cl KRIER JEFFREY M & KAREN M 7722 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320032 C1 MELSON JEFFREY T & LISA M 7734 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320033 C1 ROFFERS APRIL A 7748 JANERO CT S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320034 C1 HUEGEL KURT & TERRY 7750 JANERO CT S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320035 C1 SCHWARTZ EDWARD & CHERYL 7752 JANERO CT S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320036 C1 LEVESQUE DANIEL& DAWN 7754 JAN EROCTS 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320037 C1 SIEVERS JAMES E & KIMBERLY 17756 1ANERO CTS 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320038 Cl 1PICKAR CHRISTOPHER M & ERIN E 7507 JASMINE AVES 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320039 C1 IRUSHFORD KATHLEEN 17533 JASMINE AVES 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 10027213250401 Cl IKENDIG BRYAN A & JULIE A 17563 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 Preliminary Assessment Roll District C1 & C2 Pavement Replacement Parcel ID District Owner Address Units $ /Unit Total /Unit 1002721320041 Cl PEIFFER RICHARD DAVID 7593 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320042 Cl SEDLACEK JEFFREY D & MANDE M S SEDLACEK 7603 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320043 Cl KOMRO IRVIN T & MARY LOU 7629 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320044 Cl RICHARDSON PAUL W & JEAN A 7653 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320045 Cl EGGUM DANIEL M & CHRISTINA M 7679 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 10027213200461 C1 THOMPSON CHERYL D 7701 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320047 C1 ERICKSON STEVEN M 7705 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320048 C1 OLSON MARC A 7707 JASMINE AVES 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320049 C1 BIEBER JORDAN L & KRISTEN M 7723 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320050 Cl SCHMIDT DANIEL E & YVONNE M 7735 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320051 Cl DAY JESS L & NANCY C 7741 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320052 C1 RMS RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES LLC 7722 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320053 Cl GUSTAFSON JOHN A & LORI 7714 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.651 $4,073.65 10027213200541 Cl BAUMAN MICHAEL S & KELLY L 7706 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320055 Cl MADSEN JEFFREY Q & PAMELA ) 7702 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320056 Cl AKERVIK SUSAN ELIZABETH 7684 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320057 Cl FREYBERGER JR ALEXANDER F & AMY E FREYBERGER 7662 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320058 Cl LYNCH JASON & MARCIA REYES 7636 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320059 Cl NEUFFER GREGORY W 7604 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320060 Cl KREINER GEORGE J & SHIRLEY M 7594 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320061 Cl BOYD SCOTT & PATRICIA J 7572 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.651 $4,073.65 1002721320062 C1 KRAMER JOSEPH J & JULIE A 7550 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.651 $4,073.65 1002721320063 Cl JACKOLA ROBERT D & DIANE E 7526 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320064 Cl RISTANIKRELANDOTRS 7506 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320065 Cl YOUNG JR TIMOTHY R & CYNTHIA 7555 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320066 Cl HOFMANN RONALD F & CATHERINE 7573 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320067 Cl APITZ LYNNETTE MARIE 7597 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320068 Cl PROCAI RICHARD 1 & CYNTHIA P 7607 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 10027213200691 Cl BOLAND MICHAEL P & JUDY K 7637 JEFFERY AVES 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320070 Cl LOPEZ-CERON WILTON A 7667 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.651 $4,073.65 1002721320071 Cl JOHNSON TERANCE PHILLIP & SUSAN K SENGER 7691 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320072 Cl GRAVES MARK R & JUDY L 7703 JEFFERY AVE 5 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320073 Cl ELLIOTT BRIAN W & NANCY D 7713 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320074 Cl LESTER MICHAEL T & MOLLYJ 7717 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320075 C1 PROKOP DANIEL J & BARBARAJ 7650 JENSEN AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320076 C1 ZUBELL JON 1 & JANET K 7632 JENSEN AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320077 C1 HARDER JASON T 7622 JENSEN AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320078 Cl SEYMOUR ROBERT R & CHRISTINE 7612 JENSEN AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320079 Cl JONES SHAUN D 7602 JENSEN AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320080 Cl GRECZYNA FRANK N 7592 JENSEN AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320081 Cl PETERSON RICHARD W & BARBARA 7582 JENSEN AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320082 C1 MAGNUSON GREG & KARI 7572 JENSEN AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 10027213200831 C1 MARX RICHARD J & LINDA L 7562 JENSEN AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 10027213200841 C1 LARSON DENNIS A & TRUDY J 9187 75TH ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320085 C1 TINGO THOMAS 1 7517 JENSEN AVE S 1 $4,073.651 $4,073.65 1002721320086 C1 WINK JOHN L 7527 JENSEN AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320087 C1 KEETLEY PETER F & KIM M 7537 JENSEN AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320088 C1 STORM DONALD A & DIANE C 7547 JENSEN AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320089 C1 MILLIGAN ELIZABETH S 7557 JENSEN AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320090 C1 BAST KERNON J & DONALDAJ SPEER -BAST 7567 JENSEN AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320091 C1 TROWBRIDGE LEE E & VICKI L 7577 JENSEN AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320092 C1 KAMPS STEVEN M &JENNIFER 7587 JENSEN AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320093 C1 HARRINGTON DEBRA 7597 JENSEN AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320094 C1 QUASHNICK LARRY G & KELLEEN Y ROBINSON 7607 JENSEN AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320095 C1 BENJAMIN ROBERT M & MARGARET E 7617 JENSEN AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320096 Cl BERLING PETER M & JENNIFER A 7486 JEFFERY LN 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320097 Cl PATTAIN KEVIN J & GAILT 7498 JEFFERY LN 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320098 Cl OYE JOSHUA C & CHRISTINA A 7484 JEFFERY LN S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320099 Cl MUNKELWITZTERESA 7496 JEFFERY LN S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320100 Cl LINDQUIST NATHAN M 9100 75TH ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320101 C1 WYLIE JODI L 9090 75TH ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320102 C1 BENNETT JOHN M & NANCY 9080 75TH STS 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320103 C1 SANTANA LESLIE 7497 JEFFERY LN 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320104 C1 TAUZELL ANTHONY M & AMY 1 7485 JEFFERY LN 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721320105 C1 KENNEDY HOLUE J 9193 75TH ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330001 C1 SVEDIN ERIK A SR & ELIZABETH A & JOSEPH SVEDIN 7725 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330002 C1 GREENWELL JOHN M & KAREN T RAUCH 7745 JEFFERY CIR S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330003 C1 FRANZ DANIEL M & MARY & MARY ODGEN - FRANZ 7747 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330004 C1 BROWN JEFFREY B 7753 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330005 C1 PRIBYL PHILLIP J & DEBRA 7755 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330006 C1 DIETRICH GARYJ & UNNEA F 17765 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 Preliminary Assessment Roll District C1 & C2 Pavement Replacement Parcel ID District Owner Address Units $ /Unit I Total /Unit 1002721330007 C1 JORGENSEN REGINA M & DENNIS J 7771 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330008 Cl PERLTJACQUELINEA 7777JASMINEAVES 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330009 Cl MEYER JOEL M & NOBLE KRISTEN A 7783 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330010 Cl GRAY MICHAEL P & MINDY L COVER 7789 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330011 C1 REIMER MICHAEL K & COLLEEN A 7795 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330012 C1 HUISENGA DENNIS F & JANICE R 7796 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 10027213300131 C1 GREEN JUNE M 7792 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 10027213300141 C1 CRIDER MICHAEL K & TRICIA M 7786 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330015 C1 RYCHLY LISA M & LARRY R 1R 7780 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330016 C1 ANDERSON BRIAN D 7776 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330017 C1 SWITS GLENN V & KATHLEEN C 7768 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330018 C1 BARES GREGG A & JOAN M 7760 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330019 C1 ANTHONSEN BRYAN 1 & CATHY R 7754 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330020 C1 MOE WILLIAM E & JODI A 7746 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330021 C1 STAPLES SHAWN R 7740 JEFFERY AVES 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 10027213300221 Cl OLSON JERROLD D & GINA M 7799 JANERO AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330023 Cl MICKELSON HENRY R & PAMELA K 7789 JANERO AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330024 Cl VANDER LAAN JOHN W & DARLA B 7775 JANERO AVE 5 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330025 cl COCCHIARELLA JOHN A & KRISTINE & KRISTINE E COCCHI 7769 JANERO AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330026 Cl KENNEDY GREGORY J 7751 JANERO AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330027 Cl OLSONGARRYJ 7741 JAN ERO AVE S 1 $4,073.651 $4,073.65 1002721330028 C1 LUDWIG WILLIAM 1 & DEBORAH J 7731 JANERO AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330029 C1 ANDERSON DAVID L & LINDA L 7721 JANERO AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330030 C1 FICK JOSEPH J & JENNIFER J 7711 JANERO AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330031 C1 CLEMEN KEVIN M & HEATHER K 7752 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330032 Cl LEWANDOWSKI STACI & PHYLLIS F DEAN 7758 JASMINE AVE S i $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330033 Cl NEDRY WAYNE C & JENNIFER A 7764 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330034 Cl SOMMER JEREMY 7784 JASMINE AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330035 Cl BAILEY MYRON A & CINDY K 7788 JASMINE AVES 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330036 Cl HANSON STEVEN B 7794JASMINEAVES 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 10027213300371 Cl SCHMIDT EUGENE G & MERIDEAN 9156 78TH ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330038 Cl REED GREGORY A & PATRICIA A 9132 78TH STREET CT S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330039 Cl ROBERTS AYODELE & JERUSHA BANNAH 9128 78TH STREET CT S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330040 Cl MCELMURYJAMESD 912278TH STREET CTS 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330041 Cl POPOWITZ BRIAN L & DAWN LEA 9116 78TH STREET CT S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330042 C1 FRAMPTON OTIS T III & MARY L 9112 78TH STREET S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330043 C1 ROCHE TIMOTHY L & CINNAMON L 9108 78TH STREET CT S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330044 C1 EGAN WANDA M 9104 78TH STREET CT S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 10027213300451 Cl DICKERSON CHARLES D & KRISTINE 9042 78TH ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330046 Cl ASH JASON J & KRISTA L 9017 78TH ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330047 Cl FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP 9033 78TH ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330048 Cl MCCARTHY THOMAS P 905178TH STS 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330049 Cl BRODERICK ROBERT L & TAMMY 9103 78TH ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330050 C1 WILLIAMS MARK H & JENNIFER M 9117 78TH ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330051 C1 REIMERS THOMAS & MICHELLE 9133 78TH ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330052 C1 HAMMERO RICHARD N & KAREN E 9147 78TH ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330053 C1 MAUSOLF ROBERT J & DEBORAH E 9163 78TH ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330054 C1 ONKEN CORY 9177 78TH ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330055 C1 FULLER CHERICE B 9193 78TH STS 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330056 C1 DOCKTER GLENN D & GAYLE 1 9207 78TH ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330057 C1 JOHNSON PATRICK M & KATHERINE 9225 78TH ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330058 C1 STEINMETZ SHIRLEY 924178TH STS 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330059 C1 CHRISTIANSON LORILEE S & ANDRE 9240 79TH ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330060 C1 LAVALLE ROBERT WAYNE 9224 79TH ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330061 C1 JONES DOUGLAS W & GAIL M 9208 79TH ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330062 Cl VAN KLOMPENBURG DONALD & KAREN 9196 79TH ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330063 C1 HUERTA FERNANDO & ERIKA 9180 79TH ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330064 C1 STEINER ROBERTJ & TRACY L 9166 79TH ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330065 C1 CRUMB CHRISTOPHER & NICOLE L 9150 79TH ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330066 C1 SWANSON RICHARD A & KARI L 9134 79TH ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330067 C1 JASO JOHN P & CHERIE M 9120 79TH ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330068 C1 FISH WILLIAM R & SARA M 9106 79TH ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330069 C1 SCHNEIDER PAMELA 9056 79TH STS 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330070 C1 KNOWLES CHARLES A & KRISTAJ 9032 79TH STS 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330071 C1 SCHILLING RICHARD D & NANCY J 9020 79TH ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330072 Cl GOODPASTER MACK R & HARLAJ 7710 JANERO AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330073 Cl PIERSON GORDON E & JANET L 7720 JANERO AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330074 C1 DIGGS VALLARY M 7730 JANERO AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330075 C1 MEYER BLAKE A 7742 JANERO CTS 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330076 C1 KOONCE LEEANN 7744 JANERO CT S 1 $4,073.651 $4,073.65 1002721330077 C1 MILLER JEFFREY J & TERESA J 7746 JAN EROCTS 1 $4,073.651 $4,073.65 Preliminary Assessment Roll District C1 & C2 Pavement Replacement Parcel 1D District Owner Address Units $ /Unit I Total /Unit 1002721330078 Cl HAGEN ERIK A & REBEKAH F 7758 JANERO CT 1 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330079 Cl JACKSON KRISTINA J & JASON B 7760 JANERO CT 5 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330080 Cl DREXELJOSEPH T & MONA C 7762 JANERO CT S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330081 Cl VAN GUILDER BARBARA A 7766 JANERO AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330082 C1 ALT JOHN L & NISSEN PATRICIA L 7774 JANERO AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330083 C1 PALMERSTEN JONATHAN M 7782 JANERO AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330084 C1 TUOMINEN KENNETH F & CORINNE TUOMINEN 7790 JANERO AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330085 Cl SCHYMA DANIEL M 7798 JANERO AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330086 C1 HANSEN KURT A & SHARON M 7800 JANERO AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330087 C1 LOPEZ MATTHEW A & CAROA 1 AMAYA 7820 JANEIRO AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330088 C1 MICKELSON ALLEN L & DEBRA L 7840 JANERO AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330089 Cl LEAS JAMES A 7860 JANERO AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330090 Cl NELSON ROBERT W & MARYANN 7880 JANERO AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330091 Cl RAGAN MICHAEL E 9005 79TH ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330092 Cl GERMAINE DANIEL FRANK & CONS 9019 79TH ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330093 Cl BORENZ CHAD & ALECIA 903179TH ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330094 Cl RUGEL LINDA LIZETTE & JUAN R 9055 79TH ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330095 Cl SMITH JEAN MARIE 9105 79TH STS 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330096 Cl SERGENT ERNESTJR & CLAUDETT 9119 79TH STS 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330097 Cl BRANG LAURA 9135 79TH ST 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330098 Cl TWEETJEROME S & THERESA E 9149 79TH ST 5 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330099 C1 CARLSON WADE M &JENNIFER L 9165 79TH STS 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330100 Cl STEINECK DAVID & LORETTA SCANLAN 9179 79TH ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330101 Cl AUGE RACHELJ & GARY W WELDON JR 9195 79TH ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330102 Cl SUNDBERG KENNETH & KATHLEEN 921179TH STS 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 10027213301031 Cl REID ROBERT & CAROLYN M 9227 79TH STS 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721330104 Cl SCHNEIDER DAVID E 9243 79TH ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721340002 Cl NIEMCZYK RITA M & JEROME F 7801 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721340003 Cl MROSZAK DENNIS F 7805 JEFFERY AVE 5 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721340004 Cl SWANSON GREGORY A & JEANNE M 7809 JEFFERY CT S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721340005 Cl PEDERSON DANIEL R & LISA M 7813 JEFFERY AVE CT S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721340006 Cl WILLIAMS CAROL & JONATHAN L 7827 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721340007 C1 LARSON SUZANNE E 7863 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721340008 C1 RISTANI KRELANDO TRS 7915 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721340009 Cl LEVINE KEITH M & LAURIE L 7959 JEFFERY AVE 5 1 $4,073.651 $4,073.65 1002721340010 Cl WALLACE WILLIAM M & CHRISTINE 7737 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721340011 C1 BURSAW DAVID W & PATRICIA F 7741 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721340012 Cl BAILEY BRANDON L 7779 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721340013 Cl GORNICK RALPH A JR & JANET E 7781 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721340014 Cl SONNEE LEE E & ANDREA 7787 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721340015 Cl WAGNER SCOTT R & KIMBERLY 1 7791 JEFFERY AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721340016 C1 PEDERSON ROBERT P & GLORIA F 7795 JEFFERY AVE 5 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721340017 Cl WOULFE MAURICE J 7799 JEFFERY CTS 1 $4,073.651 $4,073.65 1002721210076 C2 RAVEN DOUGLAS R & MARCIA J 9356 73RD STS 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721210077 C2 DUTCHIN ALSTON N & PAMELA A 9324 73RD ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721210078 C2 CATALANO JOHN C 9288 73RD ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721210079 C2 HAWLEY STEPHEN R & MARY JO 9272 73RD ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721210080 C2 TVEITTALIA D 9258 73RD STS 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721210098 C2 FITZGERALD MICHAEL R & SANDRA & SANDRA M KASPRZAK 7307 JENSEN AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721210099 C2 KOATS LISA 7295 JENSEN AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721210100 C2 OLMSTEAD MICHAEL E 7273 JENSEN AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721220002 C2 HANSEN JAMES W JR & STACIA M 7366 JANERO AVE 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721220003 C2 BRANT JOSEPH L & SUSAN R 7348 JANERO AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721220004 C2 BULLIS KRISTIN L & JEFFREY J 7332 JANERO AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721220005 C2 RESSLER WILLIAM E & MARY 7316 JANERO AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721220006 C2 SCHWARTZ JASON & KAMEHA 7300 JANERO AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721220007 C2 WALTZ JEAN A & CHARLES M 7296 JANERO AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721220053 C2 HALFEN DANIELJ & PAMELAJ 9244 73RD STS 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721220054 C2 DONAHOE CHRISTOPHER M & DAWN M 9230 73RD STS 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721220055 C2 RUTSCH ARNO H 9226 73RD ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721220056 C2 PAUL GEORGE & MERCY 9214 73RD ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721220057 C2 ANDRUS SCOTT R & DAWN M 9192 73RD ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721220058 C2 SCHANK PAUL M & KARRI A 9158 73RD ST S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721220059 C2 DAHL RONALD C & CAROL J 9142 73RD ST S 1 $4,073.651 $4,073.65 1002721220060 C2 LEMIRE DOUGLAS B 9126 73RD ST 5 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721220061 C2 PAULSON BARBARA A & DAVID A KLEPAIDA 9104 73RD ST 5 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721220062 C2 KNUTSON IAN M & ANGELA L 7337 JANERO AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721220063 C2 BURTH MICHAELJ & MAUREEN 7319 JANERO AVE 5 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721220064 C2 1HENNEN DANIEL W & ANNE M 9117 73RD STS 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721220065 C2 I KOENIG BARBARA R 9135 73RD ITS 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721220066 C2 WILLENBRING MARTIN & KATHLEEN & KATHLEEN A WILLEN 9149 73RD ST 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 Preliminary Assessment Roll District C1 & C2 Pavement Replacement Parcel ID District Owner Address Units $ /Unit Total /Unit 1002721220080 C2 HANSEN JAYNE L 7294 JANERO AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230002 C2 ZAHRADKA ROBERT F & BONNIE L ZAHRADKA 7384 JAN ERO AVE 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230003 C2 LARSON JULIE A 9176 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230004 C2 JANSEN JENNIFER 9156 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230005 C2 RAWAY MARY P 9136 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230006 C2 FANGEL ROSEMARY & WILLIAM TRUS 9118 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230007 C2 GREGERSON MICHAEL C 9116 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230008 C2 BOLLMAN THOMAS & NANCY 9114 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230009 C2 MEISSNER DIANE KAY 9112 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230010 C2 OMAN TERRENCE P & BARBARA J 9110 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230011 C2 STILLWELL JONATHAN D & MARY E ZAPPA STILLWELL 9108 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230012 C2 KEIPER RICHARD J & KAREN J 9102 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 10027212300131 C2 CHAPMAN THOMASA 9056 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230014 C2 BLAIR MELISSA C & JOSHUA P 73751ANERO AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230015 C2 SIMMA BAKER &JENNIFER R HIRTE 9167 73RD STS 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230016 C2 NELSON TAMMY M 9183 73RD STS 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230017 C2 GALLAGHER JEROME T 9013 INDIAN BLVD 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230018 C2 TEGANTVOORT KURTIS A & JILL C 9055 INDIAN BLVD 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230019 C2 BEDARD MICHAEL D & MIKI K 9097 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230020 C2 WINTER JOHN P & DARLA M 9105 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230021 C2 HANDELAND DANA P & WANDA M 9109 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230022 C2 DORN DARRELL E & CAROLYN A 9115 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230023 C2 HICKEY TIM & TAMMY 9133 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230024 C2 BUTINA JOHN M & CINDY H 9145 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230025 C2 SCHLAUCH JANET L 9163 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230026 C2 FARR PAUL M 9181 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 10027212300271 C2 BJORKMAN DAVID A & MARY M 9189 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230028 C2 ROSS WILLIAM P & SUZANNE C 9199 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230029 C2 LINDBACK TIMOTHY & TANYA E 9207 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230030 C2 CALLAHAN MATTHEW P & REBECCAJ 9225 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230031 C2 STOCKBURGER JAMES P & BARBARA 9259 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721230065 C2 RYAN MATTHEW J 9184 INDIAN BLVD S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721230066 C2 NELSON CINDY 9212 INDIAN BLVD S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721230067 C2 LAUNDRY ANN M 9208 INDIAN BLVD S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 10027212300681 C2 CARLSON GRETCHEN 9188 INDIAN BLVD S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721230069 C2 TERRY JO -ANN M 9192 INDIAN BLVD 5 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721230070 C2 HOLBROOK ROLLAND L & NANCY M 9204 INDIAN BLVD S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721230071 C2 GOGALA MATTHEW A 9200 INDIAN BLVD S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721230072 C2 FLORES FRANCES S 9196 INDIAN BLVD S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721230073 C2 BIXBY JOANNE 9224 INDIAN BLVD S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721230074 C2 NGUYEN THACH & TAI HUYNH 9228 INDIAN BLVD S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721230075 C2 REHAK SARAH M 9216 INDIAN BLVD S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721230076 C2 SCHLUETER DAVID H & SUSAN SCHREINER 9220 INDIAN BLVD S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721230080 C2 WATSON TOMMY A & AKESHA D 9227 73RD ST S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721230081 C2 CRESS BRIAN J & DORIS M 923173RD ST S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721230082 C2 GUSTAVSSON KAREN M 9235 73RD ST S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721230083 C2 PETERSON NANCY C 9223 73RD ST S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721230084 C2 MCCAULEYJULIE 921973RD STS 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721230085 C2 HEVERN JOHN DJR 9239 73RD STS 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721230086 C2 WEAVER CHARLES H & MARILYN R 9243 73RD STS 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721230087 C2 LIEN DON A & MARK A & PAUL R & PAUL R LIEN 9215 73RD ST S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721230088 C2 SCHOTTMULLER JENNIFER 925173RD STS 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721230089 C2 PAGEL GLENN T 927173RD ST S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721230090 C2 WILKOSKE REBECCA L 9275 73RD STS 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721230091 C2 DYER JANET S & JAYE F 9247 73RD ST S 0.39 $4,073.651 $1,600.00 1002721230092 C2 MATTSON THOMAS 9259 73RD ST S 0.39 $4,073.651 $1,600.00 1002721230093 C2 EARLEY THOMAS W & PEGGY M 9263 73RD ST S 0.39 $4,073.651 $1,600.00 1002721230094 C2 PAGEL GLENN T & MARY E & MARY E SOTANSKI -PAGEL 9267 73RD ST S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721230095 C2 BERG PAMELA J 9255 73RD ST S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240026 C2 CLARK JODI R& KENT M COOK 7425 JENSEN AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721240027 C2 LUTZ JASON & RHONDA G 7415 JENSEN AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721240028 C2 HOLT GERALD 1 & PATRICIA L 7405 JENSEN AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721240029 C2 NELSEN DAVID M & THERESA M 7379 JENSEN AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721240030 C2 AMORES ADOR NELSON 0 & JO ANGELA S AMORES 7357 JENSEN AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721240031 C2 RENELT BRIAN P & DEANNA L 7333 JENSEN AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721240032 C2 DONLEY THOMAS M & DAWN M 7317 JENSEN AVE S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721240033 C2 NELSON WILLIAM A G & MARYJ G 9273 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721240034 C2 PALMER JOHN C & NANNINAA 9285 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721240035 C2 CHENEY JON E & SHELLY A 9299 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721240036 C2 O'MEARA GREG K & ANN M 9307 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 10027212400371 C2 KARLSTRAND JAN R & TAMARA S 9321 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $4,073.651 $4,073.65 Preliminary Assessment Roll District C1 & C2 Pavement Replacement Parcel ID District Owner Address Units $ /Unit Total /Unit 1002721240038 C2 METHNER SCOTTJ & VALOREE A 9335 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721240039 C2 SPICER JAMES H & TERESA J 9349 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721240040 C2 FRECHETTE DONALD 1 & RUTH M 9363 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721240041 C2 HAMILTON JOHN J 9379 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721240043 C2 O'NEILL TIMOTHY I &TERESE M 9419 INDIAN BLVD 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721240044 C2 HUNSTAD JOHN M & LORI A 9431 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721240045 C2 INATHE JODY M &JULIE A 0 9445 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721240046 C2 I GREGERSON MICHAEL C 9461 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721240047 C2 CRABTREE GREGORY M & SAMANTHA K 9477 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721240048 C2 BRYAN SHARON K 9493 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $4,073.65 $4,073.65 1002721240052 C2 HANSON SHERYL D 9236 INDIAN BLVD S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240053 C2 MISSERA ROBERT 9232 INDIAN BLVD S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240054 C2 BAILEY ALANA M 9244 INDIAN BLVD S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240055 C2 FLECK LISA A 9240 INDIAN BLVD S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240056 C2 DRENCKHAHN SHIRLEE 1 9248 INDIAN BLVD S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240057 C2 DOLNEY DENNIS M & JOANNE R 9276 INDIAN BLVD S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240058 C2 PETERSON VERNON H 9272 INDIAN BLVD S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240059 C2 DAHL STEVEN M & ANDREA LYOUNG 9252 INDIAN BLVD S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240060 C2 MEADE ASHLEY J 9256 INDIAN BLVD 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240061 C2 PETERSON WILLIAM C 9268 INDIAN BLVD 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240062 C2 FOX MICHAEL R 9264 INDIAN BLVD S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240063 C2 ROBENS JEREMY L 9260 INDIAN BLVD S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240064 C2 SCHUMACHER ERIC S 9288 INDIAN BLVD S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240065 C2 MONETTE DEBORAH D 9300 INDIAN BLVD S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240066 C2 BEARD ARTHUR G JR 9296 INDIAN BLVD S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240067 C2 WOODBECK DONNA J 9292 INDIAN BLVD S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240068 C2 POLING DEANNA L 9280 INDIAN BLVD S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240069 C2 HAUPERT MICHAEL D 9308 INDIAN BLVD S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240070 C2 KIRBY JOHN F & REBECCA C 9304 INDIAN BLVD S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240071 C2 STARR DEBORAH L 9284 INDIAN BLVD S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240072 C2 NELSEN BRADLEY M 9312 INDIAN BLVD S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240073 C2 CONRAD ELIZABETH A 7380 JENSEN AVE S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240074 C2 TURNER LAURA A 7390 JENSEN AVE S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240075 C2 WILDENAUER CAROL L 9316 INDIAN BLVD 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240076 C2 RAMIREZ MARTIN MAYEN & ROSALIO C POLVO LIRA 9320 INDIAN BLVD S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240077 C2 PFEIFER JUDITH K 7400 JENSEN AVE S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240078 C2 ERIKSEN DAVID & ATTN E02 JENSEN LLC 7410 JENSEN AVE S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240079 C2 BAUER CORA 9324 INDIAN BLVD S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240080 C2 OTT - SWENSON RHONDA & SWENSON A 929173RD ST S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240081 C2 KUNESH LYNN E 9295 73RD ST S 0.39 $4,073.651 $1,600.00 1002721240082 C2 WEIDLINGNICKLASJ 929973RD STS 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240083 C2 TRUHLER MARY L 9287 73RD ST S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 10027212400841 C2 MONTORRIE JULIE E 928373RD STS 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240085 C2 MAIOR CONNIE 9303 73RD STS 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240086 C2 LUHRS JUSTIN & JEANNETTE VANDENBERG 9307 73RD STS 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240087 C2 ROHWEDER ROBERT T 927973RD STS 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240088 C2 FLO SUSAN T 9315 73RD ST S 0.391 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240089 C2 PLASTER ROBIE A 9335 73RD ST S 0.391 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240090 C2 HENDRICKSON GERALD D 9339 73RD ST S 0.391 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240091 C2 KRAHN GEORGE TRS & KRAHN TRS 931173RD ST S 0.391 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240092 C2 BENDISKE BRADLEY R & JEFFREY A 9323 73RD ST S 0.391 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240093 C2 PINETREE POND EAST FIRST ASSOCIATION 932773RDST5 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240094 C2 MILLER JEANIE M 933173RD STS 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240095 C2 HAAPALA JAY W & REBECCA L 9319 73RD STS 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240096 C2 OTT - SWENSON RHONDA & SWENSON A 9355 73RD STS 0.39 $4,073.651 $1,600.00 1002721240097 C2 PETERSON STEVE M 7310 JENSEN AVE S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240098 C2 DENNIS STEPHANIE 7320 JENSEN AVE S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240099 C2 BECKRICH BARBARA L 935173RD ST S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240100 C2 SHEA SCOTT & SUSAN 934773RD STS 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240101 C2 HILL GLEN E & BARBARA 1 7330 JENSEN AVE S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240102 C2 I LINHOFF KATHRYN ATRS 7340 JENSEN AVE S 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 1002721240103 C2 IVAN HORN BRIAN K 9343 73RD STS 0.39 $4,073.65 $1,600.00 Totals 1 1 368.42 $700,820.05 Preliminary Assessment Roll District C2 Mill Overlay Parcel 1D District Owner Address Units $ /Unit Total /Unit 1002721220128 C2 GUNDERSON STEVEN D & KELLY A 7141 JENNER LN 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220126 C2 KUPHAL JOSEPH M & AMBER D 7157 JENNER LN 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220120 C2 THOMPSON BARRY LEE & CINTHIA M 7062 JENNER BAY S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220101 C2 FITZGERALD SHAWN P 72541ENNER LN S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220108 C2 JOHNSON DAVID L & SUSAN M 7210 JENNER ALCOVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220102 C2 ISERRATO MARIO 7246 JENNER ALCOVE 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220107 C2 INORRIS DAN & MELINDA 7218 JENNER ALCOVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220111 C2 THAD SHINAS PAUL & CHRISTIAN VAM 7188 JENNER ALCOVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220116 C2 ROSS MICHAELJ & ANGELA ) 7098 JENNER BAY S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220098 C2 LEMAY JAMES A & JOHNSON LISA 7225 JANERO AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220110 C2 MCGREGOR -RICE JAMIE & GERALYN CARPENTER 7192 JENNER ALCOVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220100 C2 MITTERHOLZER JAY N 7260JENNERLN 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220109 C2 DEMARRE JOHN B & KATHRYN L 7202 JENNER ALCOVE 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220103 C2 STUMP ANDREW P & JULIE A 7242 JENNER ALCOVES 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220112 C2 BLAISDELL JEFFREY J & JESSICA R 7172 JENNER BAY 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220114 C2 SMITH MICHAEL) & REBECCA 7126 JENNER BAY 5 1 $2,455.541 $2,455.54 1002721220124 C2 HANSON ROBERT A 7173 JENNER LN 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220117 C2 MORRELL DEAN E 7086 JENNER BAY S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220104 C2 HEIM MATTHEW C & TRINA S 7236 JENNER ALCOVE 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220113 C2 GRAMER WILLIAM 0 & PAULA 7144 JENNER BAY S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220121 C2 RIEGE DAVID & CHRISTINE 7050JENNER BAY 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220119 C2 BENSON JOHN D & BARBARA 7070JENNER BAY S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220127 C2 JORISSEN MICHAELJ & MICHELLE 7147 JENNER LN 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220130 C2 WILLKOM CHASE A & CHRISTINA R 7117 JENNER LN S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220106 C2 WUANGFELIX 7224JENNERALCOVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220115 C2 GARDNER LEE A & PATRICIA L 7100 JENNER BAY S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220105 C2 WEBB HENRY W JR & MARY C 7230 JENNER ALCOVE 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220122 C2 ABDELAL AMRO & SAMIA M GABER 7048 JENNER CIR S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220099 C2 IFOURNIER KAREN M 7219 JANEIRO AVE 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220129 C2 ANDERSON TROY D 7135 JENNER LN 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220125 C2 LIBEL MARK E & DIANA M GATES 7165 JENNER LN S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220118 C2 MALINSKI MICHAEL H 7078 JENNER BAY 5 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220123 C2 DONALDSON GEORGE 1 & PATRICIA 7181 JENNER LN S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721240018 C2 PUFF THERESAA 9408 INDIAN BLVD CTS 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721240002 C2 BRANDVOLD ERICT & JAMIE M 7335 JEWEL AVE 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721240004 C2 FRANKENBERG DAVID J & BEVERLY 7381 JEWEL AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721240022 C2 NELSON ERIC P 9396 INDIAN BLVD CTS 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721240023 C2 SCHULT THOMAS G & SHERRI M 9394 INDIAN BLVD CT S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721240005 C2 SCHROEER SHARON K 7399 JEWEL AVE 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721240010 C2 PESEK TODD A& KRISTI K 7378JEWELAVES 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721240003 C2 AMLAND PATRICIA E & RODNEY 7353 JEWELAVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721240025 C2 CLARKE KATHLEEN M 9390 INDIAN BLVD CT S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721240008 C2 LAUS ALFREDO & YVETTE 7338 JEWEL AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721240016 C2 HOFMANN TIMOTHY H 9412 INDIAN BLVD CT S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721240017 C2 NORTH CHRISTOPHER K 9410 INDIAN BLVD CT S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721240020 C2 MCGUIRE PAUL R & EILEEN F 9400 INDIAN BLVD CT S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721240014 C2 LANGER JAY A & REBEKAH S 9416 INDIAN BLVD CT S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721240009 C2 CHAPMAN STEPHEN J & JUDITH A 7354JEWELAVES 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721240011 C2 WEGELETERA 7398JEWELAVES 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721240013 C2 WHITE CRAIG R & BRENDA ) 7418JEWELAVES 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721240021 C2 LANGBEHN JONATHAN G 9398 INDIAN BLVD CTS 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721240024 C2 AHERNS KRISTIN A & SHANE A 9392 INDIAN BLVD CT S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120015 C2 CARLIER MARTIN & TRACY 7036 JOCELYN ALCOVE 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120020 C2 OVERLAND ROBERT G & GRACE L 7072 JOCELYN ALCOVE 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120005 C2 HALL BRAD & TARA 7015 JOLIET AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721240006 C2 BLANCK JEFFREY J &KATHLEEN A AUSTIN BLANCK 7409JEWELAVES 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721240019 C2 POOLE JAMES D & ROSE M POOLE 9406 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120047 C2 KROPP MICHAEL A & BARBARA H 7051 JOCELYN CT S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120088 C2 CHLEBECK SARAH E & KEVIN B 9692 72ND ST S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120094 C2 AGA JOHN B JR & PATRICIA M 7042 JOLIET AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120022 C2 CHATTERTON CHRISTOPHER & JAYNE 7086 JOCELYN ALCOVE 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120027 C2 RAMSDEN BENJAMIN J & KIMBERLY L RAMSDEN 7130 JOCELYN BAY S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120029 C2 STUEMPERT HILMONTJ & LINDA 7146 JOCELYN BAY 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120036 C2 OXFORD JEFFREY A & RENEE J 9524 72ND ST 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120006 C2 DANIELSON ROY W 7002 JOCELYN AVE 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120008 C2 BAILEY THOMAS G 7010 JOCELYN AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120007 C2 SUMMERS JOEL BRENT 7008 JOCELYN AVE 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120031 C2 LEITHAUSER JAMES M & JULIE L 7160 JOCELYN BAY 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120042 C2 I KAPING RANDALL A & AUDREY A 7019 JOCELYN AVE 1 $2,455.541 $2,455.54 Preliminary Assessment Roll District C2 Mill Overlay ParcellD District Owner Address Units $ /Unit Total /Unit 1002721120057 C2 PFROMM PAMELA J 7219 JOCELYN AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120085 C2 LARSON TIMOTHY C & LINDA C 9634 72ND ST S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120097 C2 ERICKSON JENNIFER & NATHAN LIND 7266 JOLIET AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120103 C2 HANG KONG PHENG & KHOU MOUA 960172ND STS 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120051 C2 KIDDER JOSEPH A & ERIN L 7125 JOCELYN CT S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120063 C2 I RYAN JAMES R & NANCY L 7329 JOCELYN PL 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120064 C2 IDUSTIN GEORGE E & MARYJ 7347 JOCELYN PL 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120077 C2 LEVANG MICHAEL & KRYSTAL & VIVIAN K PARTELLO 7217 JOLIET AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120003 C2 HEMAUER RONALD L & KATHRYN M 7001 JOLIET AVE 5 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120012 C2 BUSTAD ANGELA M & RANDY 7028 JOCELYN AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120016 C2 IJENNIGES MATHIAS M & THERESE A 7044 JOCELYN ALCOVE 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120038 C2 KLUCK ROBERT & MARY P 950472ND STS 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120018 C2 CLARK KURT & SANDRA L FINHOLT 7054 JOCELYN ALCOVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120062 C2 ISAMLASKA GREGORY M & LAVONNE 7319 JOCELYN PL 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120089 C2 WAG EN KN ECHT RICHARD A & LISA 970072ND STS 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120017 C2 HOULISTON DAVID A & DAR LA 1 7050 JOCELYN ALCOVE 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120013 C2 WOOD ROBERT J & TAMMY J 7032 JOCELYN ALCOVE 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120034 C2 PARKER MARK W & MARI ROSE 7180 JOCELYN BAY 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120043 C2 GILES TIMOTHY S & BELINDA L 7023 JOCELYN AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120021 C2 SCHMIT JAMES E & LINDA L 7078 JOCELYN ALCOVE 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120028 C2 MARTIN MICHAEL L & LORI J MARTIN 7138 JOCELYN BAY 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120030 C2 WIGANT CRAIG A & SARA E 7152 JOCELYN BAY 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120035 C2 LEFEBVRE DOUGLAS M & SANDRA L 7188 JOCELYN BAY 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120053 C2 JOHANNSEN LEROY H JR & MARY P 7163 JOCELYN AVE 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120061 C2 BERG THOMAS C & COLLEEN K 7303 JOCELYN PL 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120087 C2 PADMANABHAN ELCY & SRINIVAS 967072ND STS 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120004 C2 WILLIAMSJERRYW 7007JOLIETAVE 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120010 C2 I GLOWARTZ TIFFANY M 7020 JOCELYN AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120067 C2 BLACKBURN JULIE A 7222 JOCELYN AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120041 C2 SHERER ERICA 7009 JOCELYN AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120073 C2 HOLTER CHARLES I & CATHERINE M CULLEN 7129 JOLIET AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120080 C2 DESMOND STEVE C & JOAN M 7253 JOLIET AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120083 C2 LEWIS GRETA L 9598 72ND STS 1 $2,455.541 $2,455.54 1002721120095 C2 LAVERTY JULIA K 7290 JOLIET AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120105 C2 I BOCHE CLIFFORD M JR & JEAN M 956172ND ST S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721130017 C2 WILSON LAURIE 7460 JOCELYN AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721130067 C2 HUDALLA CYNTHIA A 7429 JOLIET AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721130076 C2 VERHOEVEN DARYL& TAMMY 9686 INDIAN BLVD 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120024 C2 PEAL NADIA M 7102 JOCELYN ALCOVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120025 C2 COTTON MARK & MARY BETH 7114 JOCELYN ALCOVE 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120054 C2 SON DAG CRAIG D & HEIDI J 7179 JOCELYN AVE 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120074 C2 DAHLY BRIAN J 7161 JOLIET AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120014 C2 GLIBBERY PETER 1 & LINDA K 7034 JOCELYN ALCOVE 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120039 C2 TESSMAN THOMAS G & JODELLE L 7003 JOCELYN AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120046 C2 MOST TERRENCE M & JULIE R 7043 JOCELYN CT 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120011 C2 GARDNER RICHARD D & HELEN M 7024 JOCELYN AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120066 C2 PAUL - PHILLIPS FRANCIS & DENISE 9507 72ND STS 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120084 C2 SOMMERNESS ADAM &JENNIFER M 961672ND STS 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120098 C2 DRENTH DEBORAH J 972172ND STS 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120040 C2 DAVIS MARSHALL L & CHRISTINE 7005 JOCELYN AVE 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120045 C2 UMBREIT GARY L & CHERYL M 7037 JOCELYN CT 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120052 C2 CAGLE JERRY W II & SHANNON S 7141 JOCELYN CT 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120058 C2 GOYTOM MANA & REDAZGI HABTEZGI 7231 JOCELYN AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120060 C2 ANDERSON DAVID M & APRIL S 7281 JOCELYN PL S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120071 C2 DULKA TREVOR S 7065 JOLIET AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120081 C2 DELANEY DANI EL J & SALLY A 7275 JOLIET AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120086 C2 CZAPLEWSKI BRADLEY & SHAUNA L ONEY 9652 72ND ST S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120019 C2 THOMPSON TERRY DEAN 7064 JOCELYN ALCOVE 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120026 C2 SLACK DAVID W & DIANE M WEBB 7122 JOCELYN ALCOVE 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120033 C2 DEFLORIN LEE & DONNAJ 7174 JOCELYN BAY 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120044 C2 COULTER KIMBERLY 1 & RONALD S 7033 JOCELYN CT 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120055 C2 HUELSMAN RICHARD J & BARBARA 7191 JOCELYN AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120075 C2 REICHOW WILLIAM A & ARDELLE 7183 JOLIET AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120049 C2 AGUIRRE RIGOBERTO &JENNIFER 7095 JOCELYN CT 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120056 C2 KONSTANDINOU SANDRA J & JOHN 7203 JOCELYN AVE 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120082 C2 GULDANTIMOTHY 957672ND STS 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120009 C2 DALLDORF TROY A & NAOMI 7516 30CELYN AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120037 C2 I KERPER MICHAEL 1 & ANITA M 19512 72ND ST S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 Preliminary Assessment Roll District C2 Mill Overlay Parcel ID District Owner Address Units $ /Unit Total /Unit 1002721120048 C2 BECK SANDRA M & TINA MURPHY 7073 JOCELYN CT 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120050 C2 BANACH CHARLES N & SUSAN M 7111 JOCELYN CT 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120059 C2 LEROSS JEFFREY N & KAREN R 7253 JOCELYN AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120070 C2 LEMAY GARY A & JOANNA L BRAUN 7023 JOLIET AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120072 C2 DAVIS JERRY L 7107 JOLIET AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120079 C2 I MYERS RANDALL 1 7231 JOLIET AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120091 C2 KRAMER JASON C & AMY M 7178 JOLIET AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120101 C2 COATES RICHARD A & LISA C W 9645 72ND ST S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721130072 C2 ROBIDEAUX JOEL &CHERYL 9646 INDIAN BLVD 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721130087 C2 TRAUTMAN DAVID W & HELEN R 7390 JOLIETAVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120093 C2 GEHLING TRAVIS & MARISSA MCDONALD 7084 JOLIET AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721130002 C2 BHARTI VIVEK & MEENA 7355 JOCELYN PL 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721130065 C2 ANDERSON JOHN R 9552 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721130070 C2 SELLNER GARY M & CAROL 9622 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120076 C2 SCHWARTZ ALAN &SUSAN T 7205 JOLIET AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120090 C2 VASEY ALAN P & SUSAN C 7190 JOLIET AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721130009 C2 OLSON MICHAEL STEVEN 9540 INDIAN BLVD 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120096 C2 SWANSON THOMAS D & JENNIFER L MILLER 7288 JOLIET AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721130003 C2 DICKINSON TIMOTHY & VICTORIA 7365 JOCELYN PL S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120092 C2 KODLUBOYTRACYA 7146 JOLIET AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120078 C2 DEMBOUSKI JASON A & ALISA M 7229 JOLIET AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721130015 C2 LARKIN ROBERT G & ANNE MARIE T 7422 JOCELYN AVE 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721240007 C2 WEBB STEVEN W & JODI A 7419 JEWEL AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721240012 C2 VERBOUT JOSEPH A & SANDRA ) 7408 JEWEL AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721240015 C2 KING JANE L& ROBERT A BONSACK 9414 INDIAN BLVD 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120099 C2 EDISON MICHAEL & PAMELA TRS 9689 72ND STS 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120068 C2 PETERSON GARY I & HALL MARGARE 7232 JOCELYN AVE 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120102 C2 DUROSE TIMOTHY P & LAURINDA R 9623 72ND STS 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120104 C2 BRUNNETTE JAMES C 9585 72ND STS 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721130014 C2 LARSEN PETER JON & JANELLE G 7404 JOCELYN AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721130005 C2 DOREE JEFF & ANNA 7393 JOCELYN AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721130073 C2 KRUMRIE JEFFREY J & JENNIFER A 9658 INDIAN BLVD 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721130071 C2 UNDOW JON & ZIGNEGO ANGELA 9634 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721130080 C2 TI MM GARRY L & SHEILA M 7323 JOLIET CIR S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721130069 C2 FLICK PAULINE M 9618 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721130078 C2 MYERS RONALD K & ARLENE A 7317 JOLIET CIR S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721130083 C2 WEBER KEITH W & PAMELA J 7339 JOLIET CIR 5 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721130013 C2 DUNCAN DAVID L & BARBARA A 7388 JOCELYN AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721130089 C2 SCHMIDT PATRICK A & DENISE C 7356 JOLIET AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721140027 C2 NUTZMAN LARRY J & LYN M 9798 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $2,455.541 $2,455.54 1002721130090 C2 COOK ALLIE L JR & THERESA M 7334 JOLIET AVE S 1 $2,455.541 $2,455.54 1002721130074 C2 LEVI JOSEPH H & CAMILLE J 9662 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721130085 C2 GATTI ANTHONY & MOLLY 7363 JOLIET AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721130091 C2 ALLEN RICHARD D & LISA M 7312 JOLIET AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721130004 C2 FRANK KENNETH W & LISA A 7385 JOCELYN AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721130012 C2 ERLING A TUFTE LIV TRS 11/30/2010 ETAL 7366 JOCELYN AVE 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721130079 C2 SOLER PAUL & REBECCA 7319 JOLIET CIR S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120100 C2 JOHNSON JOHN M & BECK] JO 9667 72ND ST S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721130007 C2 I MOGREN RICHARD M & PATRICIA A 7423 JOCELYN AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721130010 C2 LEIKNES JEFFREY D & BARBARA 7246 JOCELYN AVE 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721130082 C2 STORLIEN MARK A & PAMELA A 7337 JOLIET CIR 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721130066 C2 ERICKSON FREDERICK 9574 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721130008 C2 JUST RUBY E & NOVACK KEVIN 9532 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721130086 C2 BOYER JAMES F & VON] J JACOBSON BOYER 7401 JOLIET AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721130088 C2 REIDT ERIK D & LINDSAY R 7378 JOLIET AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721140006 C2 WAGNER ROBERT A & TAMMY L 9752 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721140029 C2 IRECKINGER PATRICK M &TANYA 9774 INDIAN BLVD 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721130016 C2 O'BRIEN JUSTIN F 7442 JOCELYN AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721130068 C2 MADISON SCOTT M & LAURIE A 9596 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721140025 C2 SCHULTZE TODD C & LAURA A M 9872 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721140028 C2 BASILIO RICO & MARLETTE BASILIO 9786 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721140026 C2 MCCAULEY RONALD W 9870 INDIAN BLVD 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120023 C2 JENSEN CYNTHIA S 7096 JOCELYN ALCOVE 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120032 C2 STOFFEL TROY & JODI 7166 JOCELYN BAY S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721120065 C2 WOZNIAK MICHAEL & RUSH & CHRISTINE RUSH 9505 72ND STS 1 $2,455.541 $2,455.54 1002721130006 C2 HAERTL THOMAS W &ANN M 7407 JOCELYN AVE 1 $2,455.541 $2,455.54 1002721130011 C2 BRIA JEFFREY D & MICHELE D 7258 JOCELYN AVE S 1 $2,455.541 $2,455.54 1002721210124 C2 IHIEKWE AUSTIN A & AMAKA A 17221 JENSEN AVE 1 $2,455.541 $2,455.54 Preliminary Assessment Roll District C2 Mill Overlay Parcel ID District Owner Address Units $ /Unit Total /Unit 1002721210139 C2 BRET01 CRAIG A & JULIE A 7039 JENSEN AVE 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210119 C2 BRAUN STEPHEN R &JENNIFER L 936071ST STS 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210130 C2 CADALBERTYVONNE 7030 JENNER CIR S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210163 C2 BLEVENS BRENT R & LISA M 9494 71ST ST S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721130081 C2 BLASKOWSKI MATTHEW L & PAMELA 7325 JOLIET CIR S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210094 C2 ICOHOON DONALDJ & BERNADINE M COHOON 7304JEWELAVES 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210102 C2 KLANN SOKHOM V & JESSICA M 7214 JANERO AVE 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210117 C2 SIKE VINCENT I & EUCHARIA U 7248 JENSEN AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210096 C2 KADLEC THOMAS A & PAULETTE M 9404 INDIAN BLVD CT S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210107 C2 STADT CHARLES G & LEANN M 7175 JANERO AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210111 C2 OLSEN ROBERT R & LORI BARTON 7158 JENSEN AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210129 C2 LEIDECKER WILLIAM & DIANE M 7034JENNER CIR S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210138 C2 ANACKER PHILLIP L & MARY A 7013 JENSEN AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210143 C2 BRENNEKE JEFFREY M & TERESA A 938471ST BAY 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210115 C2 SELZ SUSAN M 7208 JENSEN AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210147 C2 10TBLAD KEVIN M &JUSTINE E KIRCHNER 9410 71ST BAY S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210095 C2 WELLINGTON DENNIS R & BECKY L 7320JEWELAVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210112 C2 PEDERSON SCOTT & BETSY L 7168 JENSEN AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210128 C2 MALONE DAN IEL J & ANGELA A 7038 JENNER CIR S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210105 C2 IMCELVEEN CHARLES E & DONNA M MCELVEEN 7203 JANERO AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210118 C2 JHUSS JOSEPH RJR 9352 71ST ST S 1 $2,45S.541 $2,455.54 1002721120106 C2 ISCHWIETZ STEPHEN M 9559 72ND STS 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721130075 C2 IWERNER DANIELJ & LUGENEA 9674 INDIAN BLVD 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721130084 C2 I PALACIO STEVEN D & CHERIE A 7341 JOLIET AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210106 C2 BENSON BRUCE A 7191 JANERO AVE 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210083 C2 TIX THOMAS R &JUDITH A 7307 JEWEL AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210084 C2 BOUDREAU HENRY P & CHERYL 7321 JEWEL AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210135 C2 BALINT MICHAEL K & DANIELLE K 7020 JENNER CIR 5 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210104 C2 NELSON MARK W & JEANNE M 7211 JANERO AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210114 C2 ADAMS ANTHONY & NICOLE 7182 JENSEN AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210126 C2 CARPENTER JEFFREY L & SHAWN 7046 JENNER CIR S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210136 C2 LARSON MATTHEW J & ELIZABETH 7016 JENNER CIR S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210144 C2 KRONSCHNABLE CHARLES & CORRINE 9386 71ST BAY S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210146 C2 SEIDL JULIE B 939871ST BAY S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210150 C2 WEIRENS KATHLEEN A 9426 71ST STREET BAY S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210152 C2 ROY WILLIAM B & MICHELLE R 9436 71ST BAY S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210097 C2 DORDAL DAVID D & SHARON M 9402 INDIAN BLVD S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210108 C2 AGUIRRE JOSE B 7159 JANERO AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210131 C2 HURDT LEONARD FLOYD & SANDRA J 7024 JENNER CIR S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210121 C2 WAGNER RAYMOND H & ELIZABETH 7093 JENSEN AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210140 C2 PI ERCE JAMES WI LLIAM 7061 JENSEN AVE S 1 $2,455.541 $2,455.54 1002721210155 C2 RUDICH JOSEPH H & MARGARET A 9450 71ST BAY S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210161 C2 AUGE JON P & JULIA A 9486 71ST BAY S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210160 C2 ANDERSON BRUCE J & ANN E 9484 71ST BAY S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210157 C2 BEESON JOSIE M & DAVID J 9474 71ST BAY S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210174 C2 MCCOOL JOHN F & PATTI J 944171ST ST S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210142 C2 KENNEDY JENNIFER 7109 JEN NER LN 5 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210176 C2 HOLM JULIE A 9493 71ST ST S 1 $2,455.541 $2,455.54 1002721220085 C2 BUI SONNY & LIEN K HUYNH 7266 JANERO AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210103; C2 UNDJOHNP 7206 JAN ERO AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210154 C2 DOHENY SEAN 9446 71ST BAY S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210156 C2 JOHNSON I KEVIN & LINDA L 9460 71ST BAY S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210110 C2 MCGOVERN ROBERTJ JR & ROBIN J 9349 71ST ST S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210133 C2 CALLAWAY MICHAEL C & NICOLE M 7040 JENSEN AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210145 C2 MUENNICH H FRED & LINDA K 9394 71ST BAY ST 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210182 C2 SEIDEL DARIN 9378 72ND ST S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210168 C2 CHILTON SCOTT D & LISA L 7199 JEWEL AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210183 C2 MCMAKEN JON R & KEITH A BURGESS 9366 72ND ST 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210120 C2 GIBNEY ROGER H 936671ST STS 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210125 C2 FREDINE DAN & COOMBES SUSAN & SUSAN COOMBES 7251 JENSEN AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210165 C2 RONEY BRYAN CHARLES 7177 JEWEL AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210171 C2 LARTER CHRISTOPHER M & GRACE J 9375 71ST ST S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210166 C2 MAURER TIMOTHY& HEIDI PEARSON 7183 JEWEL AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210169 C2 HINZ LUCAS & KATHRYN L WITMER 7261 JEWEL AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220083 C2 DENNIS STEVEN 1 & KATHLEEN M 7264JENNER LN S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210109 C2 MELDAHLBARBARAI 71NEROAVE 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210113 C2 KNUTSON ROSS & JEANETTE K 743JA 176 JENSEN AVE 1 $2,455.541 $2,455.54 1002721210127 C2 SNOOKAMBERJ 17042 JENNER CIR S 1 $2,455,541 $2,455.54 Preliminary Assessment Roll District C2 Mill Overlay Parcel ID District Owner Address Units $ /Unit Total /Unit 1002721210148 C2 BEBEAU PAUL D & DOREEN M 9416 71ST BAY 5 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210158 C2 FULLER BRIAN P & MAUREEN D 9476 71ST BAY S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210175 C2 SHATEK SCOTT R & KRYSTAL 9477 71ST ST S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210184 C2 FLORES RAFAEL C 9373 72ND ST S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220088 C2 PETZOLD THOMAS R & KELLY L 7238 JANERO AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220094 C2 I ELLEVOLD JUSTIN & RONDA 7249 JANERO AVE 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210177 C2 SCHLICHTE MARGARET A 949672ND STS 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210186 C2 BEDNAREK ROBERT & MARLO 9409 72ND ST 5 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210149 C2 SUNDELL RYAN & RANDI 9420 71ST BAY S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210134 C2 BROWN MARK C & DIANA L & DUNNE -BROWN 7056 JENSEN AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210159 C2 MCCRADY SCOTT W & LORI 1 9480 71ST BAY S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210172 C2 KIN NEY CHRISTOPHER E & JODY D 938171ST STS 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210187 C2 LANE GREGORY & PAMELA 9443 72ND STS 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210151 O'NEIL ROBERT D & RITA M 9432 71ST BAY S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210180 PETERSON SARA 9438 72ND ST S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210137 :C2 VERTANEN SCOTT A & JENNIFER E 7004JENNERCIR 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210162 POLOS JONATHAN A & MEGAN C 9490 71ST ST 5 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210164 JAHNKE ROBERT H & DAWN P 9498 71ST ST S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220081 SCHNEIDER KENT G & JEANINE M 7290 JANERO AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210181 C2 PEDERSON STEPHANIE M 9392 72ND ST S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220093 C2 WALTERS TERRIE LYNN & ROBIN G 7255 JANERO AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210132 C2 MORRELL RONALD JAMES 7012 JENSEN AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210141 C2 STEIN SARA M & DANIEL P 7073 JENSEN AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210153 C2 ROCHE DENNIS E 9440 71ST BAY S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210179 C2 DULLUM JEFFERY A 9468 72ND ST S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210188 C2 KEISER AMY & STEVEN D 9479 72ND ST S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210190 C2 NELSEN CHRISTOPHER & KATIE M 7292 JEWELAVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220087 C2 SALVESON ERIN C &JOSEPH 7250 JAN ERO AVE S 1 $2,455.541 $2,455.54 1002721220089 C2 MOHR MICHAEL P & DEUTSCH C R & CATHERINE R DEUTSCH 7232 JANERO AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220095 C2 SHAFER DAVID ALLEN & SANDRA 7243 JANERO AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220092 C2 FITZGERALD JAMES C 1R 7269 JANERO AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210178 C2 AMLAND PATRICIA E 9482 72ND ST S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210185 C2 HUSSAIN ZAKIR & ZAREEN JAHAN 939172ND ST 5 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210116 C2 KOSTOHRYZ ALLEN J & PAMELA J 7228 JENSEN AVE 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210122 C2 HUERTA JUANITO M & MARIANA 9367 71ST ST S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210123 C2 MAYERS ALAN H & BOBBI JO P 9362 72ND ST S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210167 C2 LONERGAN JOHN A 7187JEWELAVES 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210170 C2 SELVIG CHAD D & CHRISTINE M 7293 JEWEL AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220082 C2 QUEVEDO GONZALO & TERESA 7280 JANERO AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220090 C2 MCLAUGHLIN KATHY & STEVEN 7222 JANERO AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220096 C2 PFENNING EMILY M 7237 JANERO AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210173 C2 ROSS LONNIE L & JACALYN K 9393 71ST ST S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721210189 C2 JONES TIMOTHY A & LISA G & LISA G HAKENJOS-JONES 7268 JEWEL AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220091 C2 HUBER JAMES L & LORI A 7291 JANERO AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002721220084 C2 SUTTON NATHAN &SARA 7274 JANERO AVE 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 22 72122009 08 7 100272106 C2 HANCE JONATHAN K& KATHLEEN A 7256 JANERO AVE S 1 $2,455.54 $2,455.54 1002 C2 1BRINKMANAMYS 7229 JANERO AVE S 1 $2,455.541 $2,455.54 Totals 1 3201 1 $785,772.80 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT Appendix E Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Overview A visual inspection was performed in 2012 to evaluate pavement surface conditions by identifying various pavement defects. Pavements can deteriorate at different rates due to many factors, including: original construction procedures, construction materials, traffic volume, drainage characteristics, and subsequent pavement maintenance. Due to this, pavements constructed at the same time may not deteriorate at the same rate and may have different useful lives. It should be noted that not all pavements with the same or similar PCI will look exactly the same. Various types and amounts of distress contribute to a particular PCI rating. Identifying the cause of the distress (load related vs. non -load related) is important in understanding the current pavement condition and potential rehabilitation methods. In addition, segments of the same street may in vary in condition and a representative rating for the majority of the segment is determined. Generally speaking, pavements deteriorate slowly over the first ten years and then tend to deteriorate more quickly. As pavement ages and surface cracking occurs, additional moisture is able to enter the pavement structure and accelerate deterioration. Early preventative maintenance can extend the life of pavement by protecting the pavement structure from the effects of moisture and weathering. If a pavement is left without maintenance, the pavement condition can deteriorate very rapidly towards the end of the lifecycle. This deterioration is illustrated in the following figure from the City's 1994 Pavement Management Plan: City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota 2013 Pavement Management Project 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT Figure 1- PC[ vs Age NUMBER VERBAL CONDITION SAIIN RATING CROUPfNG 90 Excellent Pavements that have little or — 80 no distress. ■ !, ki I ► 19 21 ► ► • Typical Street Life significant amounts $gal Coat ($2.2543.50) Overlay 010.00- $30.06) S Reconstruction �\ ($40.00 - $75.00) of major distress. 10 Failed 3 15 ( YEARS) 20 25 City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota 2013 Pavement Management Project Very Good Z Pavements that have 0 ' 70 a significant level of distress. s non -load related. �g 60_ Good Pavements that have p a significant level 0 of distress. 50 load related. z Fair LU W 40 Q Pavements that have (L Poor major distress. ..s 30" 20 Very Poor Pavements that have significant amounts $gal Coat ($2.2543.50) Overlay 010.00- $30.06) S Reconstruction �\ ($40.00 - $75.00) of major distress. 10 Failed 3 15 ( YEARS) 20 25 City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota 2013 Pavement Management Project Corrine A. Heine 470 U.S. Bank Plaza 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis MN 55402 0 CHARTERED (612) 337 -9217 telephone (612) 337 -9310 fax http://www.kennedy-graven.com cheine @kennedy- graven. com MEMORANDUM TO: Jennifer Levitt FROM: Corrine A. Heine, City Attorney DATE: February 14 2013 RE: Written Objections to Pavement Management Assessments You requested that I provide a memorandum that briefly explains the special assessment process. On January 16, 2013, the City Council adopted a resolution approving the feasibility report and calling for a public hearing on the 2013 Pavement Management (Districts CI and C2) Project. The hearing is scheduled for February 20, 2013. After the notices of that hearing were mailed, the City received several written objections from residents in the project area. This memo is intended to put those notices into context. Mnnesota Statutes Chapter 429 establishes the process for financing public improvements by levying special assessments against properties that benefit from those improvements. The statute sets out several detailed steps in the process, but the key points for public involvement are at two public hearings: the improvement hearing and the assessment hearing. The first public hearing is the improvement hearing, which is required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.031. The purpose of the hearing is to determine the desirability and feasibility of the proposed project. In other words, the purpose is to decide whether the City should do the project at all. The City Council must make available a reasonable estimate of the total amount to be assessed and the methodology that will be used to calculate the assessments, but the Council does not levy the assessments at the improvement hearing. If the Council decides that the project is needed and is feasible, the Council orders the project. This is the hearing that will occur on February 20 with respect to the 2013 Pavement Management Project. The next public hearing that occurs is the assessment hearing, which is required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.061. The statute allows the Council to hold the assessment hearing before the project is constructed, based on estimated costs of construction, or to hold the hearing after the project is completed, based on actual costs. In Cottage Grove, the historic practice has been 418958v1 CAH CT155 -1 Memo to Jennifer Levitt February 14, 2013 Page 2 to hold the assessment hearing after the project construction is substantially complete. The purpose of the assessment hearing is to determine the amount of the assessments that will be levied against each individual property. After the hearing is completed, the City Council adopts a resolution that levies the assessments against each property. Section 429.061 also provides the following: No appeal may be taken as to the amount of any assessment adopted under this section unless written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed with the municipal clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. All objections to the assessments not received at the assessment hearing in the manner prescribed by this subdivision are waived, unless the failure to object at the assessment hearing is due to a reasonable cause. The documents filed with the City state that "Under Minn. Stat. 429.051 [sic] I OBJECT the special assessment amount against my property. ..." The reference to Section 429.051 is a typographical error; that section has nothing to do with property owner objections or the right to appeal an assessment. The City has not scheduled an assessment hearing, and the property owner objections are obviously premature. The objections have no legal effect on the improvement hearing. It is unclear whether, if the Council later holds an assessment hearing on this project, the objections that have been filed now will have any legal effect. The owners will receive a future notice of the assessment hearing and may want to re -file their written objections at that time, if they still object to the assessment amount. I will be available at the Council meeting to answer any additional questions. -end- 4189580 CAH CT155 -1 2 VERY IMPORTANT -ROAD ASSESSMENT PUBLIC HEARING When: WED; FEBRUARY 20,'2013 at` 7 30 PM Where: New PSCH 12800 Ravine Parkway, Cottage Grove, MN (off Keats Ave) What: PUBLIC HEARING on the proposed special assessment to your property for the road project. . Why should you care? IF YOU DISAGREE WITH THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT TO YOUR PROPERTY, YOU MUST FORMALLY OBJECT to the proposed assessment of $4100 (or other amount in the letter you received) no later than the closing of the public hearing by the Mayor. Best to submit your written objection before meeting starts by city staff authorized to sign, time and date stamp your original and copy to keep. This is your last day to object in writing. You must object by)aebruary 20 X013 to RESERVE YOUR RIGHT TO SUE. If you do NOT object by Februay 2U, 2013 you will NOT be able to join any lawsuit regarding this matter. In sum, if you are not sure about joining_a law suit then "OBJECT" and protect your right to sue. You can NOT sign the `written objection" form retroactively to join the lawsuit. The city plans to move forward (START Spring 2013 End Fall 2013) on this 2013 Pavement Management Project for your areas I have trouble downloading this form at website: cgcitizensvoice,com OR Need form dropped or/ ip cked up: call 612 -250 -7069, or email: infoutsWkffisn.com or cgroadprojectsAmmail.com CONTACT: cgroadprojects @gmail.com and a form will be emailed to you. Please, submit your name, address, email (you check regularly) & phone number (to leave messages & updates) ONLY ONE OWNER needs to PRINT and SIGN name. RENTERS CANNOT SIGN FORM IF you are unsure about the 3 choices to mark, then pick all three and be protected. The authorized city staff MUST SIGN, TIME & DATE STAMP BOTH FORMS (owner & city). KEEP OWNER form. CITY FORM (bottom form) cut off and submit to city staff. OWNER COPY KEEP OBJECTI N PRINT Name : Lt h Ct e;_— Krt lik J Address: - 7496'/ _FPwaa,, k h Cottage Grov , N114 55016 Under Minn. Stat. 429.051 I OBJECT the special assessment amount against my property. , The special assessment is arbitrary and is MORE THAN THE INCREASE IN BENEFIT to my property as a result of the project is contrary to state law. Additionally, I believe I qualify for the following if checked and ask that I be given this consideration in addition to my objection: 0 Senior citizen deferral p Financial hardship deferral Other deferral programs /options offered by City, County, State or Federal lavvJ A N 1 8 2012 Clip Off & return Objection to City Hall at (or prior to) the Public Hearing on Feb. 20, 2013 CITY COPY DETACH and SUBMIT _ OBJECTION PRINT Name : Address: Under Minn. Stat. 429.051 I OBJECT the special assessment amount against my property _ The special assessment is arbitrary and is MORE THAN THE INCREASE IN BENEFIT_to my:' property as a result of the project is contrary to state law. Additionally, I believe T quay l� following if checked and ask that I be given this consideration in addition to my o� lec I gU l 3 Q ❑ Senior citizen deferral r LLI Financial hardship deferral Other deferral programs /options offered by City, County, State or Federal law CITY COPY DETACH and SUBMIT OBJECTION Name; PRINT (k1� Ft V� T SIGN " 1� a /t/� Address: �)S B :13' `� �Sy S . Cottage Grove, MN 55016 Under Minn. Stat. 429.061 I OBJECT to the special assessment amount against my property. The special assessment is arbitrary and is MORE THAN THE INCREASE IN BENEFIT to my property as a result of the project is contrary to state law. Additionally, I believe I qualify for the following if checked and ask that I be given this consideration in addition to my ob'set'o f- ❑ Senior citizen deferral ❑ Financial hardship deferral JAN 1 8 2013 Other deferral programs /options offered by City, County, State or Feder, 1 law CI - 1 Y OF' C EO l 11',GE GROVE Clip Off & return Objection to City Hall at (or prior to) the Public Hearing on Feb. 20, 2013 CITY COPY DETACH and SUBMIT OBJECTION PRINT Xame:MtCAoAZ D U mpo s IGN , __..... Address: Y// �' Cottage Grove 55016 Under Minn. Stat. 429.051 I OBJECT the special assessment amount against my pr The special assessment is arbitrary and is MORE THAN THE INCREASE IN BENEFIT to m Property as a result of the project is contrary to state law. Additionally, I believe I qualify for thy` following %checked and ask that I be given this consideration in addition to my objection; [/I Senior citizen deferral mancial hardship deferral Ef , Other deferral programs /options offered by City, county, State or Federal law CITE' COPY DETACH and SUBMIT Name: PRINT C"`'In��o�c/ Address: / 9 2—'23" Under Minn. Stat. 429,061 I OBJECT to the special assessment amount against my property. The special assessment is arbitrary and is MORE THAN THE INCREASE IN BENEFIT to my property as a result of the project is contrary to state law. Additionally, I believe I qualify for the followi!fiSenior f checked and ask that I be given this consideration in addition to my ob on citizen deferral ® Financial hardship deferral JAN ;.i 1 2M (1 Other deferral programs /options offered by City, County, State or Feder al,l�w. Clip Off & return ONection to City Hall at (or prior to the Public, CITY COPY DETACH and SUBMIT Name: JEROME FISCHER Address: _7420 JEFFERY LANE on Feb, 20, 2013 Under Minn. Stat, 429.061 I OBJECT to the special assessment amount against my property. The special assessment is arbitrary and is MORE THAN THE INCREASE IN BENEFIT to my property as a result of the project is contrary to state law, Additionally, I believe I qualify for the following if checked and ask that I be given this consideration in addition to my objection: 0 Senior citizen deferral ® Financial hardship deferral Z Other deferral programs /options offered by City, County, State or Federal law I - ` 4 �\� "L CITY COPY DETACH and SUBMIT OBJECTION PRINT Name Address: E.Jpnder Minn. Stat. 429.061 I OBJECT to the special assessment amount against my property, C ,, he special assessment is arbitrary and is MORE THAN THE INCREASE IN BENEFIT to my ,.,'property as a result of the project is contrary to state law. Additionally, I believe I qualify for the M 'following if checked and ask that I be given this consideration in addition to my objection: Senior citizen deferral C° ! N TF'nancial hardship deferral w = ( Other deferral programs /options offered by City, County, State or Federal law CTT V PRINT Name: Address: Under Minn. Stat. 429.061 I OBJECT to the special assessment amount against my property. The special assessment is arbitrary and is MORE THAN THE INCREASE IN BENEFIT to my property as a result of the project is contrary to state law. Additionally, I believe I qualify for the following if ecked and ask that I be given this consideration in addition to my objection: m or citizen deferral C thancial hardship deferral er deferral programs /options offered by City, County, State or Fede al 1 ' #PB 1 3 2013 Clip Off & return Objection to City Hall at (or prior to) the Public Hearing on Feb. 20, 2013 CITY COPY DETACH and SUBMIT OBJECTION Name: Addres Under Minn. Stat. 429.061 I OBJECT to the special assessment amount against my property. The special assessment is arbitrary and is MORE THAN THE INCREASE IN BENEFIT to my property as a result of the project is contrary to state law. Additionally, I believe I qualify for the following if checked and ask that I be given this consideration in addition to my objeetton - -_ Senior citizen deferral Financial hardship deferral SAN 5 2013 . } Other deferral programs /options offered by City, County, State or Feder 4 l law CITY COPY DETACH and SUBMIT Name: P Address: Under Minn, Stat, 429.061 I OBJECT to the special assessment amount against my property. The special assessment is arbitrary and is MORE THAN THE INCREASE IN BENEFIT to my property as a result of the project is contrary to state law. Additionally, I believe I quali fo�h -� following if checked and ask that I be given this consideration in addition to my objet ion: ❑ Senior citizen deferral 1 201 `3 ❑ Financial hardship deferral FED 1 ❑ Other deferral programs /options offered by City, County, State or Federal 1 = Ryan Schroeder City Administrator City of Cottage Grove Mr. Schroeder: 1 am responding to the letter sent out regarding the proposed improvements for the 2013 Pavement Management (Districts C1 & C2) Project. We need to take a step back and face reality here! We are not a wealthy community like some of the surrounding areas. This project would cause a definite hardship on my 93 year old Father and myself. Both of us are trying to survive on monthly Social Security checks. And with the way the economy is, I'm very sure there are plenty of others in the area who are struggling financially also. Another problem is that there is nothing wrong with our streets at this time It makes no sense at all to spend that kind of money before it is really neededl 1 see a lot of other streets /roads in our area that do need to be improved. Why ours? Just because we're on the cities list to have it done this year? This is total nonsense! Please have a little mercy on us and use a little common sense and wait till we really do need this project done! Everett Grudle Sharon Archer (POA) 7457 Jeffery lane South Cottage Grove, Mn A SPECIAL BENEFITS APPRAISAL RESTRICTED USE REPORT FORMAT (BRKW File No. 7000) A SCHOOL PROPERTY, TWO RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOME UNIT PROPERTIES AND 5 SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES SEQ OF JAMAICA AVENUE SOUTH AND 70 STREET SOUTH COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 2013 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROJECT - DISTRICT C2 VALUATION DATE: DECEMBER 6, 2012 FOR CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE ATTN: JENNIFER LEVITT, P.E. CITY ENGINEER — PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. 12800 RAVINE PARKWAY SOUTH COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 Im PAUL J. GLEASON AND MARK A. WARREN BR REAL ESTATE VALUATION SERVICES PRrAw "�" REAL ESTATE VALUATION SERVICES December 31, 2012 City Of Cottage Grove ATTN: Jennifer Levitt, P.E. City Engineer — Public Works Dept. 12800 Ravine Parkway South Cottage Grove, MN 55016 RE: Special Benefits Appraisal — 8 Properties in the Southeast Quadrant of Jamaica Ave. S. and 70 St. S., Cottage Grove, Minnesota 2013 Pavement Management Project — District C2 Dear Ms. Levitt: In accordance with your request, we are providing you with a special benefits appraisal pertaining to the above referenced public improvements project proposed by the City of Cottage Grove. This appraisal is presented in a restricted use report format, in accordance with the minimum requirements of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. The purpose of this appraisal is to develop an opinion of the special value benefits, if any, accruing to eight subject properties resulting from the proposed 2013 Pavement Management Project — District C2 street and utility improvements project in the City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota. The opinion of the value benefits resulting from the public improvement project is as of December 6, 2012, the date of inspection of the project area and subject properties. The intended use of the appraisal is to assist City of Cottage Grove officials in determining the appropriate and equitable amount of special assessments that may be levied against benefiting properties located in the project area. The intended users of the report are officials of the City of Cottage Grove. The eight subject properties, located in the southeast quadrant of Jamaica Avenue S. and 70 Street S., are in the area that is proposed for street and utility improvements, and are identified in various ways, including on a property location map, in appraisal report pages which follow. Four of the subject properties, comprising two single - family homes and two townhomes, are located on streets in the project area which are planned for full -depth pavement removal and replacement. The other four properties, which include three additional single - family homes and the site of two schools, front streets which are planned for mill and overlay improvements. BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. 1600 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, SUITE 314, ST. PAUL, MN 55104 651.646.6114 FAX 651,646.8086 www.brkw.com The value benefits, if any, of street, utility and other such public improvements accrue to the land component of a property, not to the value of buildings and other improvements on the land. The value of the buildings /improvements on the land remain the same in the before and after improvements positions. Consequently, this special benefits analysis is limited to the valuation of the land components only of the properties appraised. The before- and -after valuation methodology has been used in this appraisal, which measures the value of the subject land prior to the project in relation to the value of the land after the project. The difference between the two values reflects the special benefits to the property. Based on our investigation, we have formed the opinion that the special value benefits to the subject properties resulting from the street and utility improvement project as of December 6, 2012 are as follows: BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 2 City of Cottage Grove - Pavement Management Project - District C2 Special Benefit Conclusions - 8 Properties In Project Area Property No./Fee Owner Tax Parcel I.D. No. Improvement Type Opinion of Special Benefit 1. Independent School Dist. 833 10- 027 -21 -42 -0057 Mill and Overlay $ 78,900 (Grey Cloud Elementary & Cottage Grove Middle School) 2. Steven Dahl Jr. & Andrea Young 10- 027 -21 -24 -0059 Full Pavement $ 1,600 (Townhome Unit) Replacement 3. Dustin Gunderson 10- 027 -21 -24 -0093 Full Pavement $ 1,600 (Townhome Unit) Replacement 4. Joseph & Amber Huphal 10- 027 -21 -22 -0126 Mill and Overlay $ 2,500 (Single -Family Home) 5. George & Mercy Paul 10- 027 -21 -22 -0056 Full Pavement $ 5,000 (Single - Family Home) Replacement 6. Stephanie Pederson 10- 027 -21 -21 -0181 Mill and Overlay $ 2,500 (Single - Family Home) 7. Kevin & Hollie Ott 10- 027 -21 -13 -0071 Mill and Overlay $ 2,500 (Single -Family Home) 8. Janet Schlauch 10- 027 -21 -23 -0025 Full Pavement $ 5,000 (Single - Family Home) Replacement BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 2 This appraisal assignment was not based on a requested minimum valuation or a specific valuation for approval of a loan. The opinions of market value identified in this report were developed independent of any undue influence. The values, which are based on property market exposure times of 6 to 12 months, assume all real estate taxes and special assessment balances, if any, have been paid in full. They are gross values and no allowance was made for brokerage commissions, real estate taxes or other carrying costs associated with the properties during the marketing period. No personal property is included in our opinions of market value. This appraisal report has been prepared in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) as promulgated by the Appraisal Foundation. The facts and information contained in this report were obtained from sources that are considered to be reliable and are true to the best of our knowledge and belief, but are not guaranteed. This appraisal report is contingent upon the assumptions and limiting conditions included within this report. Your attention is directed to the following report for the supporting data, analyses and conclusions that support the market value opinion. Sincerely, BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. dj , Paul J. Gl on Certified General Real Property Appraiser Minnesota License #4003073 Mark A. Warren Certified General Real Property Appraiser Minnesota License 420415370 BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTIES APPRAISED ......................... ............................... 1 PROJECT AND SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATION MAP ............................. ............................... 2 PURPOSE /INTENDED USE OF APPRAISAL ................................... ..............................3 PROPERTY RIGHTS APPRAISED ................................................. ............................... 3 ZONING........................................................................................ ............................... 3 SCOPEOF WORK .......................................................................... ..............................3 COMPETENCY PROVISION ........................................................... ..............................4 MARKET VALUE DEFINITION ...................................................... ..............................5 CONTINGENT AND LIMITING CONDITIONS ............................... ............................... 5 DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTIES - BEFORE IMPROVEMENTS .................... 6 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ......................... ............................... 8 HIGHEST AND BEST USE .............................................................. ..............................9 SPECIAL BENEFIT CONSIDERATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS ..... ............................... 10 SPECIAL BENEFIT ANALYSIS PROCESS ................................... ............................... 11 OPINION OF PROPERTY VALUE BENEFITS .............................. ............................... 12 CERTIFICATION ........................................................................ ............................... 13 PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS ........................................... ............................... 14 IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTIES APPRAISED The eight properties which are the subject of this appraisal are located in the southeast quadrant of Jamaica Avenue S. and 70 Street S., in Cottage Grove, Minnesota, which is proposed for street and utility improvements by the City of Cottage Grove. The subject properties are identified in the summary table below and described in greater detail later in this report. Subject Properties Summary Property No./Fee Owner T Address/Location Tax Parcel I.D. No. Legal Description 1. Independent Shool Dist. 833 9525 & 9775 Indian Blvd. S. 10- 027 -21 -42 -0057 Lengthy legal - retained in appraisal file. (Grey Cloud Elementary & Cottage Grove Middle School) 2. Steven Dahl Jr. & Andrea Young 9252 Indian Blvd. S. 10- 027 -21- 240059 Lot 4, Block 5, Pinetree Pond East 4th (Townhome Unit) 3. Dustin Gunderson 9327 - 73rd St. S. 10- 027 -21 -24 -0093 Lot 2, Block 8, Pinetree Pond East 5th (TOwnhonle Unit) 4. Joseph & Amber Kuphal 7157 Jenner Lane S. 10- 027 -21 -22 -0126 Lot 4, Block 3, Pinetree Pond East 7th (Single- Family Home) 5. George & Mercy Paul 9214 - 73rd Street S. 10- 027 -21 -22 -0056 Lot 22, Block 5, Pinetree Pond East 3rd (Single - Family Home) 6. Stephanie Pederson 9392 - 72nd Street S. 10- 027 -21 -21 -0181 Lot 11, Block 3, Pinetree Pond East 8th (Single - Family Home) 7. Kevin & Hollie Ott 9634 Indian Blvd. S. 10- 027 -21 -13 -0071 Lot 5, Block 2, East Parkview 5th (Single- Family Home) 8. Janet Schlauch 9163 Indian Blvd. S. 10- 027 -21 -23 -0025 Lot 9, Block 11, Pinetree Pond East 3rd (Single - Family Home) BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 1 1 ■���C�, �� Subject4 , �i ���f Allo �, •,, � ��� �� � �� Subject 6 / 7 � �I ::::■ Subject 5 ! ,� " Subject 1 , • �.� , !1F aS.RS Subject 8 Subject 2 m -0 W IN losidd logo ad ����` in �� Subject 1 ago W WI we AN MGM �, �``� "■ ��N� �'��' .r ��► Fl WE glad N e momm Coyof COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA ■ ■H1■ ■ ■� ■� ■■ ■`,� � to � `,r � � �� ��v:�`��.�►/ � • l •- • S.—y— 2013 PAVEMEffr MANAGEMENT PROJECr PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS FIGURE 4 Project and Subject Property Location Map BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 2 PURPOSE /INTENDED USE OF APPRAISAL The purpose of this appraisal is to develop an opinion of the special value benefits, if any, accruing to eight properties resulting from the 2013 Pavement Management Project — District C2 in the City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota. Four of the subject properties, comprising two single - family homes and two townhomes, are located on streets in the project area which are planned for full -depth pavement removal and replacement. The other four properties, which include three additional single - family homes and the site of two schools, front streets which are planned for mill and overlay improvements. The opinion of the value benefits resulting from the public improvement project is as of December 6, 2012, the date of inspection of the project area and subject properties. The intent of the special benefits appraisal is to assist City of Cottage Grove officials in determining the appropriate and equitable amount of special assessments that may be levied against benefiting properties located in the project area. The intended users of the report are officials of the City of Cottage Grove. PROPERTY RIGHTS APPRAISED The property rights appraised are those of the fee simple estate. ZONING SCOPE OF WORK An exterior inspection was made of the subject properties on December 6, 2012. The City of Cottage Grove, through its consulting engineer Bolton & Menk, Inc., also provided the appraisers with information describing existing conditions and proposed street, utility and related improvements in the project area, which is located in the southeast quadrant of Jamaica Avenue S. and 70 Street S. The appraisers reviewed and considered the information as part of the special benefits valuation. BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 3 Property Zoning District 1. 9525 & 9775 Indian Boulevard South R -4, Low Density Residential District 2. 9252 Indian Boulevard South R -4, Low Density Residential District 3. 9327 - 73rd Street South R -4, Low Density Residential District 4. 7157 Jenner Lane South R -4, Low Density Residential District 5. 9214 - 73rd Street South R -4, Low Density Residential District 6. 9392 - 72nd Street South R -4, Low Density Residential District 7. 9634 Indian Boulevard South R -4, Low Density Residential District 8. 9163 Indian Boulevard South R -4, Low Density Residential District SCOPE OF WORK An exterior inspection was made of the subject properties on December 6, 2012. The City of Cottage Grove, through its consulting engineer Bolton & Menk, Inc., also provided the appraisers with information describing existing conditions and proposed street, utility and related improvements in the project area, which is located in the southeast quadrant of Jamaica Avenue S. and 70 Street S. The appraisers reviewed and considered the information as part of the special benefits valuation. BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 3 All of the subject properties contain buildings and supporting site improvements. However, the value benefits, if any, of street, utility and other such public improvements accrue to the land component of a property, not to the value of buildings and other improvements on the land. The value of the buildings/ improvements on the land remain the same in the before and after improvements positions. Consequently, this special benefits analysis is limited to the valuation of the land components only of the properties appraised. Opinions of the market value of the subject property land components have been developed in this appraisal using the Direct Sales Comparison Approach and the Development Cost Approach. The Direct Sales Comparison Approach involves the comparison and analysis of land parcels recently sold which are similar to the subject land. The Development Cost Approach addresses the net present value of land that can be subdivided and developed into multiple parcels, by deducting from total retail lot value potential the costs of development and profit requirements of the developer. The application of the Cost and Income Approaches typically applies only when the property valuation includes buildings and other improvements with contributory value. Since this appraisal addresses the subject property land components only, the Cost and Income Approaches do not apply. The subject land is valued before and after the proposed street /utility improvements. The difference between the before and after values is the special benefit attributable to the proposed improvement project. This report is presented in a Restricted Use Report format in compliance with the minimum reporting requirements of Standards Rule 2 -2 (c) of the Uniform Standards of Appraisal Practice (USPAP). The results of the analysis and the conclusions pertaining to the value benefits to the subject properties are presented in an abbreviated manner in this report, at a level of detail sufficient for the needs of the intended users. Additional notes, analyses, and supporting data are retained in the appraiser's office work file. The opinions and conclusions stated in this report may not be understood properly without additional information in the appraisers' work file. This Restricted Use Report is intended to be read and used only by the intended users identified herein. COMPETENCY PROVISION Paul J. Gleason has been a full -time professional real estate appraiser since April 1992. Mark A. Warren has been a full -time professional real estate appraiser since June 2003. Provided later in this report are summaries of their professional qualifications. The educational training and extensive work experience of the appraisers, each of whom is licensed as a Certified General Real Property Appraiser, enable completion of this appraisal assignment in a professional manner consistent with the intent of the competency provision of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 4 MARKET VALUE DEFINITION Market Value as defined by the United States Department of the Treasury through the Comptroller of the Currency and the Office of Thrift Supervision is: The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller, each acting prudently, knowledgeably and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby: ♦ buyer and seller are typically motivated; ♦ both parties are well informed or well advised, and each acting in what he considers his own best interest; ♦ a reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; ♦ payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and ♦ the price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale. This definition is also recognized by the Appraisal Foundation and is part of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). CONTINGENT AND LIMITING CONDITIONS This appraisal report is subject to the following Limiting Conditions and Assumptions: 1. The legal description contained herein is assumed to be correct. 2. The appraiser assumes no responsibility for matters legal in nature affecting the property appraised or the title thereto, nor does the appraiser render any opinion as to the title, which is assumed to be good and marketable. The property is appraised as though under responsible ownership. 3. No survey has been prepared of the property by the appraiser and no responsibility is assumed in connection with such matters. Sketches in this report are included only to assist the reader in visualizing the property. 4. Information furnished by others is assumed to be reliable. However, the appraiser assumes no responsibility for its accuracy. 5. In cases where no soil tests have been submitted, the appraiser has assumed a good subsoil condition, subject to visual observations noted in the report. 6. The appraiser assumes that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions of the property, subsoil or structures, which would render it more or less valuable. The appraiser assumes no responsibility for such conditions or for engineering that might be required to discover such factors. BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 5 7. The appraiser is not required to give testimony or appear in court because of having made this appraisal with reference to the property in question, unless arrangements have been previously made. 8. The distribution of the total valuation in this report between land and improvements applies only under the highest and best use of the property. 9. The Bylaws and Regulations of the professional appraisal organizations with which the appraiser is affiliated govern disclosure of the contents of the appraisal report. 10. Possession of this report, or a copy thereof, does not carry with it the right of publication. It may not be used for any purpose by any person other than the party to whom it is addressed without the written consent of the appraiser, and, in any event, only with proper written qualifications and only in its entirety. 11. Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report, or a copy thereof, shall be conveyed to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales or any other media without written consent and approval of the appraiser. Nor shall the appraiser, firm or professional organization of which the appraiser is a member be identified without the written consent of the appraiser. 12. The value conclusion assumes all taxes and special assessments are paid in full. 13. The after improvements valuation in this appraisal assumes proposed street improvements have been completed in accordance with the description of the proposed work provided to the appraiser. Environmental Disclaimer: The values estimated in this report are based on the assumption that the property is not adversely affected by the existence of hazardous substances or detrimental environmental conditions. A routine inspection of the property did not reveal or indicate any such conditions. In that the appraiser is not qualified in this field of expertise, the client is encouraged to retain an expert in such investigations, if so desired. DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTIES — BEFORE IMPROVEMENTS Neighborhood The subject neighborhood comprises a generally fully developed mixed use area of Cottage Grove located in the central part of the city. The general neighborhood boundaries are 70`' Street South on the north, Keats Avenue South on the east, 80` Street South on the south and Jamaica Avenue South on the west. The neighborhood contains a mix of property uses including civic /institutional and residential (single - family and town home /condo). Major roadways providing access to and through the neighborhood include east -west collectors 70` Street S. and Indian Boulevard S., as well as north -south collectors Jamaica Avenue S. and Keats Avenue S. The subject properties are located along and north of Indian Boulevard South between Jamaica and Keats Avenues, and south of 70` Street S. BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 6 Properties Description Of Subject Properties Land Area Property (Ac.) Use/Improvements Comments 1. 9525 & 9775 Indian Blvd. S. 104.77 Elementary & Middle School Generally level site located at SW corner of Keats Ave. S. and Indian Boulevard S. Approximately 97.61 acres of the site is usable. 2. 9252 Indian Boulevard South 0.09 One -story townhome One -story townhome attached to three other similar townhomes in a four -unit building. Located in a townhome project with 20 4 -unit buildings (80 units total). Located in area to receive full pavement replacement. 3. 9327 - 73rd Street South 0.11 Two -story townhome Two -story townhome attached to three other similar townhomes in a four -unit building. Located in a townhome project with 20 4 -unit buildings (80 units total). Located in area to receive full pavement replacement. 4. 7157 Jenner Lane South 0.20 Single -Family Home Located on south side of Jenner Lane S., in area to receive mill and overlay replacement. Open landscape with minimal trees. House was built in 1989. 5. 9214 - 73rd Street South 0.33 Single -Family Home Located on north side of 73rd Street S., in area to receive full pavement replacement. Open landscape with minimal trees. House was built in 1987. 6. 9392 - 72nd Street South 0.25 Single -Family Home Located on north side of 72nd Street S., in area to receive mill and overlay replacement. Open landscape with minimal trees. House was built in 1989. 7. 9634 Indian Boulevard South 0.67 Single -Family Home Located at north end of the Indian Boulevard S. cul -de -sac between Joliet and Jordon Aves., in area to receive mill and overlay replacement. Open landscape with minimal trees. House was built in 1992. 8. 9163 Indian Boulevard South 0.23 Single -Family Home Located on south side of Indian Boulevard S., in area to receive full pavement replacement. Open landscape with minimal trees. House was bin in 1986. BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 7 Access /Infrastructure Streets — The streets within the project area were constructed between 1980 and 1992, with their condition being indicative of age, and in need of either rehabilitation or replacement. The majority of streets were constructed between 1988 and 1992, and are in need of rehabilitation, consisting of a mill and overlay. The streets in need of full pavement replacement were constructed in 1980, and their condition is such that rehabilitation is no longer cost effective. The only exception of a 32 year old street not in need of full pavement replacement is a cul -de -sac street north of Indian Boulevard S. between Jensen and Jewel Avenues. The cul -de -sac street, despite its age, is in better condition due to it not being a through street. The concrete curb /gutter in the project area is for the most part in satisfactory condition. However, there are exception areas where some sections need repair or replacement. Utilities — All urban service utilities, including city water and sanitary sewer, are available in the area of the subject properties, and all are presumed to be connected to the properties. The appraisers have not been provided with any information indicating there are serious deficiencies with the existing utility infrastructure. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS The proposed improvements in the project area known as the 2013 Pavement Management Project — District C3 are as follows: Mill and overlay rehabilitation of the vast majority of streets This includes milling off approximately 1.5 inches of bituminous, perform crack sealing and patching as needed on the remaining pavement, then pave 1.75 inches of new bituminous pavement. Full -depth pavement removal and replacement Due to the advanced age associated with some of the roads in the project area, a full -depth pavement removal and replacement is necessary. The areas in need of this include Indian Boulevard South between Jamaica and Jewel Avenues, Jensen Avenue South between Indian Avenue South and just south of 72 Street South, and 73 Street South between Janero and Jensen Avenues. • Spot replacement of concrete curb /gutter where needed It is estimated that approximately 20% of the concrete curb /gutter in the project area is in poor condition and is need of replacement. • Replacement or repairs of traffic signs where needed This includes replacing or supplementing traffic signs to meet the latest federal retroreflectivity requirements and for conformance to the city sign policy. of repairs of utilities where needed BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 8 HIGHEST AND BEST USE Highest and Best Use — Before Street Improvements As Vacant Shown below is the concluded highest and best use, as vacant, of each property: Property Noffee Owner Address /Location Highest And Best Use, As Vacant 1. Independent Shool Dist. 833 9525 & 9775 Indian Blvd. S. Low density residential development (Grey Cloud Elementary & Cottage Grove Middle School) 2. Steven Dahl Jr. & Andrea Young 9252 Indian Blvd. S. Townhome development (Townhome Unit) 3. Dustin Gunderson 9327 - 73rd St. S. Townhome development (Townhome Unit) 4. Joseph & Amber Kupinal 7157 Jenner Lane S. Single -family home development (Single- Family Home) 5. George & Mercy Paul 9214 - 73rd Street S. Single -family home development (Single - Family Home) 6. Stephanie Pederson 9392 - 72nd Street S. Single - family home development (Single - Family Home) 7. Kevin & Hollie Ott 9634 Indian Blvd. S. Single- family home development (Single - Family Home) 8. Janet Schlauch 9163 Indian Blvd. S. Single - family home development (Single- Family Home) As Improved Only the land components of the subject properties are being appraised and therefore the highest and best use, as improved, was not addressed. Highest and Best Use — After Street Improvements After the street improvements, the highest and best use of all of the subject properties remains the same relative to the before improvements position. BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 9 SPECIAL BENEFIT CONSIDERATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS 1. Before the proposed public improvements, the streets in the area of the subject properties are relatively old, worn and deteriorated. The streets are indicative of their age whereas the 20 to 24 year old streets have reached a level of condition such that routine repairs and maintenance are no longer cost effective measures for keeping the surface in safe, smooth operating condition. There is underlying structural fatigue below the top pavement layer that requires fortification in order to restore the serviceability of the road going forward. These streets are in need of rehabilitation consisting of milling off approximately 1.5 inches of bituminous, perform crack sealing and patching as needed on the remaining pavement, then pave 1.75 inches of new bituminous pavement. The streets that are 32 years old have reached a level such that rehabilitation is no longer cost effective. The condition of these streets is such that full pavement replacement is necessary to keep the streets in a safe, smooth operating condition. 2. Though most of the curb /gutter is in adequate condition, some sections are in need of replacement due to their age. It is estimated that 20% of the concrete curb /gutter in the project area is in poor condition and is in need of replacement. 3. The condition and quality of streets serving and fronting residential properties influences the value, curb appeal and general desirability of the properties. 4. The rehabilitation of the streets in the area of the subject properties will substantially improve the safety, convenience and general appeal of access into and out of the subject properties. The project reverses the deteriorating state of the existing street and the new street surface, together with repaired curb /gutter, will result in optimum drainage of the street surface to promote a long lifespan of the new street section. Since Indian Boulevard S. is a relatively well - traveled minor arterial roadway, the proposed project improvements will result in some level of general benefit to neighborhoods and properties beyond the immediate subject area. However, the improvements also will create significant special benefits as well, to properties located in the immediate vicinity of the improvement project, such as the subject properties identified in this appraisal. The land value increase for properties, on a percentage basis as well as on a per - square -foot, per -acre or per- front -foot of land basis, resulting from street and utility improvements can vary, and in this appraisal they do vary. The variations in benefit level are attributable to differences among the properties in site size, highest and best use, amount of street frontage relative to the depth and overall size of the site, amount of usable /buildable land area, and /or other factors. BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 10 SPECIAL BENEFIT ANALYSIS PROCESS Arriving at an opinion of special value benefits accruing to the subject properties as a result of the proposed improvements is accomplished by developing "before improvements" and "after improvements" opinions of market value for the subject land. The improvements on the land are concluded to have the same value contributions to the total property value in both the "before and after" improvements positions. Consequently, the extent of special value benefits from the public improvements project can be reliably derived by analyzing the value of the land only, by processing the Direct Sales Comparison Approach. The Direct Sales Comparison Approach was applied in valuing all eight properties. This approach involves the comparison of recently sold land parcels similar to the subject property. The comparable sale prices are analyzed and adjustments are made for value - related differences relative to the subject properties. The result of the analysis and adjustments is the generation of a range of value indications for the subject land. The strengths and weaknesses of each comparable sale and its value indication are evaluated before arriving at a final value opinion for the subject land parcel. The Development Cost Approach was also applied in valuing Property 1. The Development Cost Approach addresses the net present value of land that can be subdivided and developed into multiple parcels, by deducting from total retail lot value potential the costs of development and profit requirements of the developer. Retained in the appraisers' office file for this assignment are market data, notes and other supporting information pertaining to the processing of the Direct Sales Comparison Approach in a before - and -after land value analysis for each of the properties which are the subject of this appraisal. Shown on the following page is the result of these analyses, comprising opinions of special benefits for each property resulting from the proposed 2013 Pavement Management Project — District C2 improvement project: BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 11 City of Cottage Grove - Pavement Management Project - District C2 Special Benefit Conclusions - 8 Properties In Project Area Property Noffee Owner Tax Parcel I.D. No. Improvement Type Opinion of Special Benefit 1. Independent School Dist. 833 10- 027 -21 -42 -0057 Mill and Overlay $ 78,900 (Grey Cloud Elementary & Cottage Grove Middle School) 2. Steven Dahl Jr. & Andrea Young 10- 027 -21 -24 -0059 Full Pavement $ 1,600 (Townhome Unit) Replacement 3. Dustin Gunderson 10- 027 -21 -24 -0093 Full Pavement $ 1,600 (Townhome Unit) Replacement 4. Joseph & Amber Huphal 10- 027 -21 -22 -0126 Mill and Overlay $ 2,500 (Single - Family Home) 5. George & Mercy Paul 10- 027 -21 -22 -0056 Full Pavement $ 5,000 (Single- Family Home) Replacement 6. Stephanie Pederson 10- 027 -21 -21 -0181 Mill and Overlay $ 2,500 (Single - Family Home) 7. Kevin & Hollie Ott 10- 027 -21 -13 -0071 Mill and Overlay $ 2,500 (Single- Family Home) 8. Janet Schlauch 10- 027 -21 -23 -0025 Full Pavement $ 5,000 (Single - Family Home) Replacement The above opinions of special benefits reflect increases in property market values resulting from the proposed improvements. The market values are based on estimated property market exposure times of 6 to 12 months. BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 12 CERTIFICATION The undersigned does hereby certify that in this appraisal report: 1. This appraisal assignment is not based on a requested minimum valuation or specific valuation for approval of a loan. The estimate of market value identified in this report was developed independent of any undue influence. 2. Neither our engagement to make this appraisal (or any future appraisals for this client), nor any compensation, therefore, are contingent upon the development or report of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of value estimate, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of the appraisal. 3. Our engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results. 4. We have no present or contemplated future interest in the real estate that is the subject of this appraisal report. 5. We have no personal interest or bias with respect to the subject matter of this appraisal report or the parties involved. 6. To the best of our knowledge and belief the statements of fact contained in this appraisal report upon which the analyses, opinions and conclusions expressed herein are based, are true and correct. 7. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and is our personal, impartial, and unbiased analyses, opinions, and conclusions. 8. This appraisal report has been made in conformity with and is subject to the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct of the Appraisal Institute, and the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. 9. No one provided significant professional assistance to the person(s) signing this certification. 10. We have made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report. 11. The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives. 12. As of the date of this appraisal, Paul J. Gleason and Mark A. Warren have completed the Standards and Ethics Education Requirement of the Appraisal Institute for Associate Members. 13. The by -laws and regulations of the Appraisal Institute govern disclosure of the contents of this appraisal report. 14. Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report (especially any conclusions as to value, the identity of the appraiser or the firm with which he /she is connected, or any reference to the Appraisal Institute or MAI designation) shall be disseminated to the public through advertising media, public relations media, news media, sales media, or any other public means of communication without the prior written consent and approval of the undersigned. 15. We have the knowledge and experience to complete this appraisal in a competent manner. We have not been sued by a regulatory agency or financial institution for fraud or negligence involving an appraisal report. 16. We have performed services, as an appraiser, regarding the property that is the subject of the report within the three year period immediately preceding acceptance of this assignment. �a Paul J. Gle s n ark A. Warren Certified General Real Property Appraiser Certified General Real Property Appraiser Minnesota License #4003073 Minnesota License #20415370 BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 13 PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS PAUL J. GLEASON PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS AND ASSOCIATIONS General Associate Member — The Appraisal Institute To date, all required courses for Appraisal Institute MAI designation have been taken and course examinations passed; Comprehensive Examination for MAI designation has been passed; Experience Requirement has been completed. APPRAISER LICENSE Certified General Real Property Appraiser — State of Minnesota — License #4003073 EDUCATION University of Wisconsin at La Crosse, Wisconsin — 1985 Bachelor of Science Degree in Business Administration PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Principal — BRKW Appraisals, Inc., St. Paul, MN, 2007 - present Staff Appraiser — BRKW Appraisals, Inc., St. Paul, MN, 1993 -2006 Appraiser — Certified Appraisers, Excelsior, MN, 1993 Appraiser — Stiles Appraisals, Inc., Plymouth, MN, 1992 -1993 Expert Witness Testimony — For real estate litigation in numerous condemnation commissioners' hearings, arbitration hearings and in District Court Presenter /Speaker at Minnesota Department of Transportation's 2010 Right Of Way Professionals Workshop, Breezy Point, MN Appraisal assignments have been completed for the following purposes: Condemnation — Partial and total acquisitions, in fee title and in easement form Property Damage Claims Litigation Special Benefits Valuation Mortgage Financing General Valuation Needs — Purchase negotiations, listing prices, internal family or partnership transactions, estate planning /taxes, marriage dissolution, etc. BRI {W APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 14 Professional Qualifications — Paul J. Gleason Page 2 PROPERTY TYPES APPRAISED Land — Commercial, industrial, residential acreage, agricultural, finished lots Commercial Buildings — Office, industrial, retail, medical office, auto dealerships Apartment Buildings /Complexes 1 -4 Family Residential — Single - family home, townhome, condo, duplex, fourplex PROFESSIONAL REAL ESTATE STUDIES Appraisal Institute courses, including all required for MAI designation: Course 110: Appraisal Principles (examination passed) Course 120: Appraisal Procedures (examination passed) Course 210: Residential Case Study Course 310: Basic Income Capitalization Course 410: National Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice Course 420: Business Practices and Ethics Course 510: Advanced Income Capitalization Course 520: Highest and Best Use and Market Analysis Course 530: Advanced Sales Comparison and Cost Approaches Course 540: Report Writing and Valuation Analysis Course 550: Advanced Applications Numerous additional classes and seminars for appraisal pre- license and continuing education requirements, on an ongoing basis, from Appraisal Institute and other sources CLIENTS INCLUDE Cities of Apple Valley, Burnsville, Cambridge, Cottage Grove, Eagan, Inver Grove Heights, Lino Lakes, Lonsdale, Maplewood, Oak Park Heights, Plymouth, Prior Lake, Robbinsdale, Savage, Wabasha and Woodbury Anchor Bank BMO Harris Bank N.A. Associated Bank Bremer Bank Dougherty, Molenda, Solfest, Hills & Eckberg, Lammers, Briggs, Wolff Bauer, P.A. & Vierling, PLLP Greene Espel PLLP Minnesota Bank & Trust Minnesota Dept. of Transportation Spire Federal Credit Union US Bank And various other individuals, attorneys, communities and counties Revised: June 2012 BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 15 PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS MARK A. WARREN PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS AND ASSOCIATIONS General Associate Member — The Appraisal Institute APPRAISER LICENSE Certified General Real Property Appraiser - State of Minnesota - License #20415370 EDUCATION University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota Bachelor of Arts Degree — Religious Studies Major, 2003 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE July 2009 to Present: Appraiser — BRKW Appraisals, Inc., St. Paul, MN October 2005 to July 2009: Appraiser — The Appraisal Group, Maple Grove, MN June 2003 to October 2005: Appraiser — Elmquist- Warren Appraisals, St. Paul, MN PROPERTY TYPES APPRAISED Apartment Buildings Medical Clinics Restaurants Auto Service Centers Mini- Storage Buildings Retail Stores Banks Mixed Use Properties Shopping Centers Churches Mobile Home Parks Single Family Homes Condos & Townhomes Office Buildings Special Purpose Convenience Stores Office - Showrooms R & D Buildings Gas Stations Office - Warehouses Vacant Land Manufacturing Buildings Recreational Facilities BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 16 Professional Qualifications — Mark A. Warren Page 2 PROFESSIONAL REAL ESTATE STUDIES Basic Income Capitalization, Appraisal Institute, 2005 Advanced Sales Comparison & Cost Approaches, Appraisal Institute, 2006 Report Writing & Valuation Analysis, Appraisal Institute, 2006 Advanced Income Capitalization, Appraisal Institute, 2007 Highest & Best Use & Market Analysis, Appraisal Institute, 2007 National USPAP Update Course, Appraisal Institute, 2007 & 2009 Associates Guidance Leadership Program, Appraisal Institute, 2009 The New Residential Market Conditions Form, Appraisal Institute, 2009 Condemnation Appraising: Principles & Applications, Appraisal Institute, 2009 Fundamentals of Separating Real Property, Personal Property, and Intangible Business Assets, Appraisal Institute, 2012 Revised: June 2012 BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 17 A SPECIAL BENEFITS APPRAISAL RESTRICTED USE REPORT FORMAT (BRKW File No. 6707) SPECIAL BENEFITS VALUATION OF THREE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES 2012 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROJECT CITY PROJECT NO. 11 -296 COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA VALUATION DATE: AUGUST 31, 2011 FOR CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE ATTN: JENNIFER LEVITT, P.E. CITY ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 8635 WEST POINT DOUGLAS ROAD SOUTH COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 :_ PAUL J. GLEASON AND MARK A. WARREN BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. REAL ESTATE VALUATION SERVICES BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. REAL ESTATE VALUATION SERVICES September 19, 2011 City of Cottage Grove ATTN: Jennifer Levitt, P.E. City Engineer Public Works Dept. 8635 West Point Douglas Rd. S. Cottage Grove, MN 55016 RE: Special Benefits Valuation of Three Residential Properties 2012 Pavement Management Project City Project No. 11 -296 Cottage Grove, Minnesota Dear Ms. Levitt: In accordance with your request, we are providing you with a special benefits appraisal pertaining to the above referenced public improvement project proposed by the City of Cottage Grove. The effective date of valuation is August 31, 2011, which is the date of our inspection of the project area and subject properties. Based on our prior agreement, this appraisal is presented in a restricted use report format, in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. Three properties, which are intended to be representative of the larger group of properties proposed for assessment, have been appraised herein. The purpose of the special benefits appraisal is to provide an opinion of the increase in market value, if any, that will accrue to each of the appraised properties as a result of the proposed 2012 Pavement Management Project, referred to as City Project No. 11 -296. The intended use of the appraisal is to assist City of Cottage Grove officials in determining the appropriate and equitable amount of special assessments that may be levied against properties benefited by the proposed improvement project. The intended users of the report are City of Cottage Grove officials. The value benefits, if any, of street, utility and other such public improvements accrue to the land value component of a property, not to the value of buildings and other improvements on the land. Consequently, this special benefits analysis is limited to the valuation of only the land components of the properties appraised. SPRUCE TREE CENTRE SUITE 314 1600 UNIVERSITY AVE ST PAUL MN 55104 651 •646.61 1 4 FAX 651 •646.8086 6rkw@6rkw.com The before - and -after valuation methodology has been used in this appraisal, which analyzes the market value of the subject land prior to the project in relation to the market value of the land after the project. The difference between the before and after opinions of market value reflects the value of special benefits to each of the appraised properties, as of August 31, 2011, as shown below: 2012 Pavement Management Project - City Project No. 11 -296 Opinion of Land Values and Property Value Benefits Property Address Tax Parcel ID Land Area Value Before Value After Special Benefit $ % 1. 9105 - 79th Street South 10- 027 -21 -33 -0095 0.24 ac. $60,100 $65,100 $5,000 8.32% 2. 7741 Janero Avenue South 10- 027 -21 -33 -0027 0.24 ac. $63,600 $68,600 $5,000 7.86% 3. 7733 Jeffery Avenue South 10- 027 -21 -31 -0003 1 0.56 ac. $67,700 1 $72,700 $5,000 7.39% This appraisal assignment is not based on a requested minimum valuation or a specific valuation for approval of a loan. The opinions of market value and special benefits identified in this report were developed independent of any undue influence. The opinions of value assume all real estate taxes and special assessment balances, if any, have been paid in full. The values are gross values with no allowances made for brokerage commissions, real estate taxes or other carrying costs associated with a property during its marketing period. This appraisal report has been prepared in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) as promulgated by the Appraisal Foundation. The facts and information contained in this report were obtained from sources that are considered to be reliable and are true to the best of our knowledge and belief, but are not guaranteed. This appraisal report is contingent upon the assumptions and limiting conditions included within this report. Your attention is directed to the following report which summarizes the data, analyses and conclusions that support the opinions of value. Sincerely, BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. W1AA1, Paul J. G e son Certified General Real Property Appraiser Minnesota License #4003073 l e a A. Warren Certified General Real Property Appraiser Minnesota License #20415370 BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE /INTENT OF THE APPRAISAL /INTENDED USERS ......... ............................... 1 SCOPEOF WORK .......................................................................... ..............................1 IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTIES APPRAISED /LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS ..................2 PROPERTY RIGHTS APPRAISED ................................................. ............................... 2 ZONING........................................................................................ ............................... 2 COMPETENCY PROVISION ........................................................... ..............................2 MARKET VALUE DEFINITION ...................................................... ..............................3 CONTINGENT AND LIMITING CONDITIONS ................................ ..............................4 DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTIES - BEFORE IMPROVEMENTS .................... 5 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ......................... ............................... 7 PROJECT LOCATION MAP .......................................................... ............................... SUBJECT PROPERTIES IDENTIFICATION MAP ...................................... ............................... 9 HIGHEST AND BEST USE ........................................................... ............................... 10 SPECIAL BENEFIT CONCLUSIONS ............................................ ............................... 10 SPECIAL BENEFIT ANALYSIS PROCESS ................................... ............................... 11 OPINION OF LAND VALUES AND PROPERTY VALUE BENEFITS ............................. 12 CERTIFICATION ........................................................................ ............................... 13 PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS ........................................... ............................... 14 PURPOSE /INTENT OF THE APPRAISAL /INTENDED USERS The purpose of this appraisal is to develop an opinion of the special value benefits, if any, accruing to three properties resulting from the 2012 Pavement Management Project — City Project No. 11 -296 in the City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota. The opinion of the value benefits resulting from the public improvement project is as of August 31, 2011, the date of inspection of the project area and subject properties. The intent of the special benefits appraisal is to assist City of Cottage Grove officials in determining the appropriate and equitable amount of special assessments that may be levied against benefiting properties located in the project area. The intended users of the report are officials of the City of Cottage Grove. SCOPE OF WORK The City of Cottage Grove is proposing to rehabilitate several streets as part of its 2012 Pavement Management Project, referred to as City Project No. 11 -296. The streets to be improved are depicted on various maps throughout this report. Three properties in the project area have been appraised in this report. The opinions of special benefits developed in this appraisal for the three appraised properties will be used by the City of Cottage Grove as a basis for levying special assessments to other benefiting properties in the project area as well. A viewing of the project area and exterior inspections of the three subject properties were made on August 31, 2011, which is the effective date of valuation. Since the benefits of public improvement projects such as street rehabilitation accrue to the land component of properties only, the valuation in this report involves land only. Opinions of the market value of the subject properties have been developed in this appraisal using the Direct Sales Comparison Approach. This approach, which is the one most appropriate for valuing land, involves the comparison and analysis of land parcels recently sold which are similar to the land being appraised. The application of the Cost and Income Approaches typically applies only when a property valuation includes buildings and other improvements having contributory value. The subject land parcels are valued before and after the proposed project improvements. The difference between the before and after opinions of market value is the special benefit value attributable to the proposed project. This report is presented in the restricted use report format in compliance with the reporting requirements of Standards Rule 2 -2 (c) of the Uniform Standards of Appraisal Practice (USPAP). The results of the analysis and the conclusions pertaining to the value benefits to the subject properties are presented in an abbreviated manner in this report, at a level of detail sufficient for the needs of the intended users. Additional notes, analyses, and supporting data are retained in the appraisers' office workfile. The opinions and conclusions stated in this report may not be understood properly without additional information in the workfile. The report is intended to be read and used only by the intended users identified herein. BRICW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 1 IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTIES APPRAISED /LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS The addresses, tax parcel numbers, owners and legal descriptions of the appraised properties, based on information provided by Washington County, are presented below. Subject Properties Summary Address TaxParcel# Owner Legal Description R -3, Single - Family Residential District 3. 7733 Jeffery Avenue South R -3, Single - Family Residential District Lot 57, Block 6, Pinetree Pond East 2nd 1.9105 - 79th Street South 10- 027 -21 -33 -0095 Jean Marie Smith Addition Lot 6, Block 4, Pinetree Pond Estate 2nd 2.7741 Janero Avenue South 10- 027 -21 -33 -0027 Garry Olson Addition Timothy Lindblom Lot 6, Block 2, Pinetree Pond East 2nd 3.7733 Jeffery Avenue South 10- 027 -21 -31 -0003 Sheri Lindblom Addition PROPERTY RIGHTS APPRAISED The property rights appraised are those of the fee simple estate. ZONING Property Zoning District 1. 9105 - 79th Street South R -3, Single - Family Residential District 2. 7741 Janero Avenue South R -3, Single - Family Residential District 3. 7733 Jeffery Avenue South R -3, Single - Family Residential District COMPETENCY PROVISION Paul J. Gleason has been a full -time professional real estate appraiser since April 1992. Mark A. Warren has been a full -time professional real estate appraiser since June 2003. Provided later in this report are summaries of their professional qualifications. The educational training and extensive work experience of the appraisers, each of whom is licensed as a Certified General Real Property Appraiser, enable completion of this appraisal assignment in a professional manner consistent with the intent of the competency provision of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 2 MARKET VALUE DEFINITION Market Value as defined by the United States Department of the Treasury through the Comptroller of the Currency and the Office of Thrift Supervision is: The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller, each acting prudently, knowledgeably and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby: ♦ buyer and seller are typically motivated; ♦ both parties are well informed or well advised, and each acting in what he considers his own best interest; ♦ a reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; ♦ payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and ♦ the price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale. This definition is also recognized by the Appraisal Foundation and is part of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 3 CONTINGENT AND LIMITING CONDITIONS This appraisal report is subject to the following Limiting Conditions and Assumptions: 1. The legal descriptions contained herein are assumed to be correct. 2. The appraiser assumes no responsibility for matters legal in nature affecting the property appraised or the title thereto, nor does the appraiser render any opinion as to the title, which is assumed to be good and marketable. The property is appraised as though under responsible ownership. 3. No survey has been prepared of the property by the appraiser and no responsibility is assumed in connection with such matters. Sketches in this report are included only to assist the reader in visualizing the property. 4. Information furnished by others is assumed to be reliable. However, the appraiser assumes no responsibility for its accuracy. 5. In cases where no soil tests have been submitted, the appraiser has assumed a good subsoil condition, subject to visual observations noted in the report. 6. The appraiser assumes that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions of the property, subsoil or structures, which would render it more or less valuable. The appraiser assumes no responsibility for such conditions or for engineering that might be required to discover such factors. 7. The appraiser is not required to give testimony or appear in court because of having made this appraisal with reference to the property in question, unless arrangements have been previously made. 8. The distribution of the total valuation in this report between land and improvements applies only under the highest and best use of the property. 9. The Bylaws and Regulations of the professional appraisal organizations with which the appraiser is affiliated govern disclosure of the contents of the appraisal report. 10. Possession of this report, or a copy thereof, does not carry with it the right of publication. It may not be used for any purpose by any person other than the party to whom it is addressed without the written consent of the appraiser, and, in any event, only with proper written qualifications and only in its entirety. 11. Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report, or a copy thereof, shall be conveyed to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales or any other media without written consent and approval of the appraiser. Nor shall the appraiser, firm or professional organization of which the appraiser is a member be identified without the written consent of the appraiser. 12. The value conclusion assumes all taxes and special assessments are paid in full. 13. The after improvements valuation in this appraisal assumes proposed improvements have been completed in accordance with the description of the proposed work provided to the appraisers by the City of Cottage Grove. Environmental Disclaimer: The value opinions in this report are based on the assumption that the subject properties are not adversely affected by the existence of hazardous substances or detrimental environmental conditions. A routine inspection of the properties did not reveal or indicate any such conditions. In that the appraisers are not qualified in this field of expertise, the client is encouraged to retain an expert in such investigations, if so desired. BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 4 DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTIES — BEFORE IMPROVEMENTS Neighborhood The subject properties are located in an established residential area in the central part of Cottage Grove. The general neighborhood boundaries are 70 Street South on the north, Keats Avenue South on the east, 80 Street South on the south and Jamaica Avenue South on the west. Homes in the subject neighborhood are generally similar in age, style and price, with lots that are typically less than one -third of an acre in size. The area is best described as moderate or mid - priced. Properties Following are brief descriptions of the three appraised properties. Land areas were provided by Washington County and are subject to survey. 1. 9105— 79 Street South This property fronts the south side of 79 Street South and backs to 80 Street South. The lot is rectangular, measuring 68' x 150.52', for a total land area of 10,235 SF or 0.24 acres. 80th Street South in this area receives daily traffic volumes of 7,500 vehicles. The property has a mostly open landscape with moderate tree cover and is generally level at street grade. The house was built in 1981. 2. 7741 Janero Avenue South This property fronts the southeast side of Janero Avenue South. The lot is rectangular, measuring 80' x 130', for a total land area of 10,400 SF or 0.24 acres. The property has an open landscape with minimal trees and is generally level at street grade. The house was built in 1987. 3. 7733 Jeffery Avenue South This property is on the northeast side of the Jeffrey Avenue South cul -de -sac. The land area is 24,426 SF or 0.56 acres. Frontage on the cul -de -sac is 55.64'. The lot slopes downward from the street frontage to the northeast. The rear of the property is heavily wooded and backs to Kingston Park. The house was built in 1980. BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 5 Access /Infrastructure The following description of access /infrastructure in the subject neighborhood is limited to the area containing the streets proposed for improvements in City Project No. 11 -296, as shown below: 1. The streets within the project area were originally constructed in 1979 and 1980 and are classified as local residential roads, with the exception of Jeffery Avenue between 80 Street and 75 Street, and 75 Street from Jamaica Avenue to Indian Boulevard, which are considered collector routes. 2. According to engineering tests, the average street section consists of 3" bituminous paving over 4 - 5" of gravel. Existing Street Sections — District C1 No. Location Materials 1 77891anero Ave 3" Bituminous, 4" Gravel 2 7787 Jeffery Ave 3.5" Bituminous, 4" Gravel 3 7555 Jeffery Ave 3" Bituminous,8" Gravel 4 9187 75` St 4" Bituminous, 3" Gravel 5 i 7420 Jeffery Ave 3" Bituminous, 5" Gravel Source: Bonestroo 3. Generally, the streets are 32 feet in width. The only exceptions are Jeffery Avenue between 80 Street and 75 Street, and 75 Street from Jamaica Avenue to Indian Boulevard. These collector routes are 44 feet wide. 4. The Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of these streets ranges from 17 to 69 on a scale of I to 100, with 100 being the condition of a new street. Much of the pavement shows major distress with seal coats and overlays no longer viable options to maintain the streets. 5. All of the roads were constructed using surmountable concrete curb and gutter. Sections of the existing curb and gutter have settled, cracked, or have other defects that require replacement. 6. The water mains were installed when the streets were built, but are reported to be generally in good condition, with exceptions. 7. The existing storm sewer and storm structures were inspected and found to be in generally good condition. However, some problems exist including cracked or broken pipes and dirty lines. BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 6 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 1. For the majority of the streets, it is proposed to fully remove the pavement and replace with 3.5 inches of new pavement. The exceptions are 75 Street and Jeffery Avenue south of 75"' Street, the collector routes. Due to the additional traffic associated with collector roadways, it is proposed to reclaim the existing pavement and gravel base to a depth of approximately 8 inches. The subgrade material will be excavated approximately 5.5 inches. The reclaimed material will then be spread, shaped and graded to allow for 3.5 inches of non -wear and 1.5 inches of new pavement. 2. The curb and gutter will be replaced 100 %. 3. There will be no driveway aprons replaced with the project. Each apron will be patched with the material of what exists in the before situation. 4. Traffic signs will be evaluated, and are proposed to be replaced or supplemented as part of the project to meet federal retroreflectivity requirements and for conformance to the city sign policy. 5. Existing sanitary sewer pipes are recommended to be repaired where there are cracks, and where there are sags with a history of back -ups, the recommendation will be for the pipe to be removed and replaced. Manhole castings will be salvaged and reinstalled. Existing concrete adjusting rings are to be replaced with new HDPE adjusting rings. 6. It is proposed that the existing water main valves that are not operational be removed and replaced. Ten hydrants are in need of adjustment and it is proposed to extend the hydrant barrel on each of the ten hydrants. All hydrants in the project area will have concrete hydrant access pads installed in accordance with city standards. 7. Cracks and leaky or offset joints in the existing storm sewer will be addressed and recommended for in -line repairs. Any of the structures in poor condition and adjusting rings will be replaced to conform to current city standards. Existing castings will be savaged, and other repairs will be performed as needed. BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 7 N M>WJY® LOCATION PLAN CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MN FIGURE 1 ory of 2012 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROJECT gag Grove 1: \48\ 48112960 \CAD\DWG\4811296FDO1.Dl4G DATE: 06 -17 -11 COMM: 000048-11286-0 Mrrama BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 8 LEGEND waPA a Er+r REnACB4EW CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MN FIGURE 4 2012 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROJECT I: \48 \48112960 \CAD \DWG \4811296ZFD04.D W G DATE: 08 -01 -11 COMM: 000048-11296-0 Coy Or Cotta Grove Mmnesoio BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 9 0 30D 600 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT DISTRICTS Cl & C3 — PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS HIGHEST AND BEST USE Highest and Best Use - Before Proposed Improvements As Vacant In the case of all three subject properties, the highest and best use, if vacant, is for development with single - family homes. As Improved Only the land components of the subject properties are being appraised. Therefore, the highest and best use, as improved, is not addressed. Highest and Best Use - After Proposed Improvements After the proposed street and related improvements are completed, the highest and best use of the subject properties is unchanged relative to the before improvements position. SPECIAL BENEFIT CONCLUSIONS 1. Before the proposed improvements, the roads in the project area are relatively old, deteriorated and approaching the end of their physical lives. It can be anticipated that further deterioration will result in a worsening of problems associated with advanced age, including improper drainage, uneven driving surfaces, increased formation of potholes, etc. 2. It is recognized that the condition and quality of streets serving and fronting residential properties influences the value, curb appeal and general desirability of the properties. 3. The proposed rehabilitation of the roads serving the subject properties will substantially improve the safety, convenience and general appeal of access into and out of the subject properties. The project will reverse the deteriorating state of the roads and result in new street surfacing. 4. Safety aspects for vehicles traveling on a new street are enhanced by the elimination of potholes, cracks, etc. Street icing problems are reduced as water is more efficiently diverted off the roadway surface that could otherwise collect in the deteriorated street areas during frost seasons. A significant amount of benefit resulting from the project is special, attaching to the properties directly fronting and accessing the rehabilitated streets, including the subject properties. BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 10 SPECIAL BENEFIT ANALYSIS PROCESS Arriving at an opinion of special value benefits accruing to each of the subject properties as a result of the proposed improvements is accomplished by developing "before improvements" and "after improvements" opinions of market value for the three appraised land parcels. The improvements on the land are concluded to have the same value contributions to the total property value in both the "before and after" improvements positions. Consequently, the opinion of direct value benefits from the public improvements project can be reliably developed by analyzing the value of the land only, by processing the Direct Sales Comparison Approach. The Direct Sales Comparison Approach, which involves the comparison of recently sold land parcels similar to the subject land parcels, is applied to the valuation of the subject properties. The comparable sales are analyzed and adjustments are made for value - related differences relative to the subject properties. The result of the analysis and adjustments is the generation of value indications for each of the appraised properties. The strengths and weaknesses of each comparable sale and its value indication are evaluated before arriving at a final opinion of value for an appraised property. Retained in the appraisers' office file for this assignment is market data, notes and other supporting information pertaining to the processing of the Direct Sales Comparison Approach in a before - and -after land value analysis for each of the properties which are the subject of this appraisal. Opinion of Land Value Before Improvements After adjustments are made to the prices of the comparable land sales for value- related differences in relation to the subject land, the comparables provide value indications for each of the subject properties. Before - improvements value opinions are developed for each of the subject properties based on the value indications of the comparable sales. The opinions of value for the subject properties prior to the proposed street and related improvements are shown in the exhibit on the next page. Opinion of Land Value After Improvements Similar to the before - improvements valuation, in the after- improvements valuation the comparable sales are again analyzed and compared to the subject land. An after - improvements value opinion is developed for each of the subject properties based on the value indications provided by the comparable sales. The opinions of value after improvements for the subject properties are shown in the exhibit on the next page. BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 11 Special Value Benefits From Improvements Project The before- improvements values are subtracted from the after - improvements values, resulting in opinions of special value benefits to each of the subject properties resulting from the proposed roadway rehabilitation project, as indicated below. 2012 Pavement Management Project - City Project No. 11 -296 Opinion of Land Values and Property Value Benefits Property Address Tax Parcel ID Land Area Value Before Value After Special Benefit $ % 1. 9105 - 79th Street South 10- 027 -21 -33 -0095 0.24 ac. $60,100 $65,100 $5,000 8.32% 2. 7741 Janero Avenue South 10- 027 -21 -33 -0027 0.24 ac. $63,600 $68,600 $5,000 7.86% 3. 7733 Jeffery Avenue South 10- 027 -21 -31 -0003 1 0.56 ac. $67,700 1 $72,700 $5,000 7.39% BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 12 CERTIFICATION The undersigned does hereby certify that in this appraisal report: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10 11 This appraisal assignment is not based on a requested minimum valuation or specific valuation for approval of a loan. The estimate of market value identified in this report was developed independent of any undue influence. Neither our engagement to make this appraisal (or any future appraisals for this client), nor any compensation, therefore, are contingent upon the development or report of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of value estimate, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of the appraisal. Our engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results. We have no present or contemplated future interest in the real estate that is the subject of this appraisal report. We have no personal interest or bias with respect to the subject matter of this appraisal report or the parties involved. To the best of our knowledge and belief the statements of fact contained in this appraisal report upon which the analyses, opinions and conclusions expressed herein are based, are true and correct. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and is our personal, impartial, and unbiased analyses, opinions, and conclusions. This appraisal report has been made in conformity with and is subject to the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct of the Appraisal Institute, and the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. No one provided significant professional assistance to the person(s) signing this certification. We have made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report. The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives. 12. As of the date of this report, Paul J. Gleason and Mark A. Warren have completed the Standards and Ethics Education Requirement of the Appraisal Institute for Associate Members. 13. The by -laws and regulations of the Appraisal Institute govern disclosure of the contents of this appraisal report. 14. Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report (especially any conclusions as to value, the identity of the appraiser or the firm with which he /she is connected, or any reference to the Appraisal Institute or MAI designation) shall be disseminated to the public through advertising media, public relations media, news media, sales media, or any other public means of communication without the prior written consent and approval of the undersigned. 15. We have the knowledge and experience to complete this appraisal in a competent manner. Neither our company nor ourselves individually have been sued by a regulatory agency or financial institution for fraud or negligence involving an appraisal report. � � 5 Paul J. Gleas Certified General Real Property Appraiser Minnesota License #4003073 a ark A. Warren G(�CNicPir�/ Certified General Real Property Appraiser Minnesota License #20415370 BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 13 PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS PAUL J. GLEASON PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS AND ASSOCIATIONS General Associate Member — The Appraisal Institute To date, all required courses for Member of Appraisal Institute (MAI) designation have been taken and course examinations passed; Comprehensive Examination for MAI designation has been passed. APPRAISER LICENSE Certified General Real Property Appraiser — State of Minnesota — License #4003073 EDUCATION University of Wisconsin at La Crosse, Wisconsin — 1985 Bachelor of Science Degree in Business Administration PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Principal — BRKW Appraisals, Inc., St. Paul, MN, 2007 - present Staff Appraiser — BRKW Appraisals, Inc., St. Paul, MN, 1993 -2006 Appraiser — Certified Appraisers, Excelsior, MN, 1993 Appraiser — Stiles Appraisals, Inc., Plymouth, MN, 1992 -1993 Expert Witness Testimony — For real estate litigation in numerous condemnation commissioners' hearings, arbitration hearings and in District Court Presenter /Speaker at Minnesota Department of Transportation's 2010 Right Of Way Professionals Workshop, Breezy Point, MN Appraisal assignments have been completed for the following purposes: Condemnation — Partial and total acquisitions, in fee title and in easement form Property Damage Claims Litigation Special Benefits Valuation Mortgage Financing General Valuation Needs — Purchase negotiations, listing prices, internal family or partnership transactions, estate planning /taxes, marriage dissolution, etc. BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 14 Professional Qualifications — Paul J. Gleason Page 2 PROPERTY TYPES APPRAISED Land — Commercial, industrial, residential acreage, agricultural, finished lots Commercial Buildings — Office, industrial, retail, medical office, auto dealerships Apartment Buildings /Complexes 1 -4 Family Residential — Single - family home, townhome, condo, duplex, fourplex PROFESSIONAL REAL ESTATE STUDIES Appraisal Institute courses, including all required for MAI designation: Course 110: Appraisal Principles (examination passed) Course 120: Appraisal Procedures (examination passed) Course 210: Residential Case Study Course 310: Basic Income Capitalization Course 410: National Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice Course 420: Business Practices and Ethics Course 510: Advanced Income Capitalization Course 520: Highest and Best Use and Market Analysis Course 530: Advanced Sales Comparison and Cost Approaches Course 540: Report Writing and Valuation Analysis Course 550: Advanced Applications Numerous additional classes and seminars for appraisal pre - license and continuing education requirements, on an ongoing basis, from Appraisal Institute and other sources CLIENTS INCLUDE Cities of Apple Valley, Burnsville, Cottage Grove, Eagan, Maplewood, Oak Park Heights, Plymouth, Prior Lake, Robbinsdale, Savage, Woodbury Dakota County Parks and Open Space Greene Espel PLLP Minnesota Bank & Trust Severson, Sheldon, Dougherty & Molenda, P.A. Eckberg, Lammers, Briggs, Wolff & Vierling, PLLP M &I Bank Minnesota Department of Transportation Spire Federal Credit Union And various other individuals, attorneys, communities and counties Revised: February 2011 BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 15 PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS MARK A. WARREN BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. 1600 University Avenue, Suite 314 St. Paul, Minnesota 55104 Telephone: (651) 646 -6114 Facsimile: (651) 646 -8086 e -mail: mwarren@brkw.com PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS AND ASSOCIATIONS General Associate Member - The Appraisal Institute APPRAISER LICENSE Certified General Real Property Appraiser - State of MN License #20415370 EDUCATION University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota Bachelor of Arts Degree — Religious Studies Major, 2003 EMPLOYMENT HISTORY July 2009 to Present: Appraiser — BRKW Appraisals, Inc., St. Paul, MN October 2005 to July 2009: Appraiser — The Appraisal Group, Maple Grove, MN June 2003 to October 2005: Appraiser — Elmquist- Warren Appraisals, St. Paul, MN PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Property types appraised include the following: Apartment Buildings Medical Clinics Restaurants Auto Service Centers Mini - Storage Buildings Retail Stores Banks Mixed Use Properties Shopping Centers Churches Mobile Home Parks Single Family Homes Condos & Townhomes Office Buildings Special Purpose Convenience Stores Office- Showrooms R & D Buildings Gas Stations Office - Warehouses Vacant Land Manufacturing Buildings Recreational Facilities PROFESSIONAL REAL ESTATE STUDIES Basic Income Capitalization, Appraisal Institute, 2005 Advanced Sales Comparison & Cost Approaches, Appraisal Institute, 2006 Report Writing & Valuation Analysis, Appraisal Institute, 2006 Advanced Income Capitalization, Appraisal Institute, 2007 Highest & Best Use & Market Analysis, Appraisal Institute, 2007 National USPAP Update Course, Appraisal Institute, 2007 & 2009 Associates Guidance Leadership Program, Appraisal Institute, 2009 The New Residential Market Conditions Form, Appraisal Institute, 2009 Condemnation Appraising: Principles & Applications, Appraisal Institute, 2009 Revised: October 2010 BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 16