HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-02-20 PACKET 04.I.REQUEST OF CITY COUNCIL ACTION
PREPARED BY:
COUNCIL AGENDA
MEETING ITEM #
DATE 02/20/201 • /.
Finance Robin Roland
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT HEAD
***************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST:
Consider increasing the Fire Relief Association pension benefit amount which is guarenteed
by the City.
STAFF RECOMMENDATI
Increase the City guaranteed benefit level from $2,600 per year of service to $3,150 per year
of service and that the City contribute 65% of the annual independent audit costs for the
Cottage Grove Fire Relief Association in 2013.
BUDGET IMPLICATION
N/A
BUDGETED AMOUNT
N/A
ACTUAL AMOUNT
ADVISORY COMMISSION ACTION
DATE
REVIEWED
APPROVED
DENIED
❑ PLANNING
❑
❑
❑
❑ PUBLIC SAFETY
❑
❑
❑
❑ PUBLIC WORKS
❑
❑
❑
❑ PARKS AND RECREATION
❑
❑
❑
❑ HUMAN SERVICES /RIGHTS
❑
❑
❑
❑ ECONOMIC DEV. AUTHORITY
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
® MEMO /LETTER: Roland
® RESOLUTION:
❑ ORDINANCE:
COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: ❑ APPROVED ❑ DENIED ❑ OTHER
H: \Council items \CC Action Form.doc
T�
r � •
To: Mayor and City Council Members
Ryan Schroeder, City Administrator
From: Robin Roland, Finance Director
Date: February 14, 2013
Subject: Pension Increase Request
Introduction
On August 27, 2012, the Cottage Grove Fire Relief Association notified the City Council that
the members had voted to increase the yearly pension benefit level from $3,600 per year of
service to $4,000 per year of service. Further, the request asked that the City increase the
amount it guarantees from a current level of $2,600 per year of service to the $4,000 level as
well.
Discussion
Minnesota Statutes grant a Fire Relief Association the authority to increase their benefit level
without City approval if the plan is fully funded. This has been the option the CG Fire Relief
Association has pursued. As was stated in the request, almost all other cities guarantee the
same amount as their Fire Relief Association. In doing so, those Cities face exposure to
significantly increased contributions funded by taxpayer dollars should the Association's plan
fall below the fully funded level.
Recommendations from the State Auditor's report include the following language:
• To ensure the long -term health of a plan, relief association trustees and municipal officials
should be cautious when considering benefit changes. Relief association trustees, members,
municipalities, and independent nonprofit firefighting corporation boards must understand the
effects that benefit changes have on the contribution requirements and long -term health of the
plan before approving new benefit levels. Implementing smaller, but more frequent, benefit
changes may provide more consistency to municipalities that are required to make contributions,
and make benefit amounts more consistent over time.
The attached analysis compares benefit levels and municipal contributions from 2008 and
2010 between 17 cities in our peer group. It shows that municipal contributions increased by
$1,898,514 despite no increase in benefit level. Significant investment losses at December 31,
2008 were the instigating factor. In fact, the report from the Office of the State Auditor in 2010
identifies that Relief Associations statewide received 80% more in municipal contributions in
2010 than they did in 2008. Furthermore, in 2008 the required amount of municipal
contributions totaled $1.5 million; in 2010 that total was $9.8 million, more than 6.5 times as
much.
Historically, the benefit levels of the Relief Association and the City's guaranteed level
compare as follows:
year
Relief Assn
City
Funding %
at Relief
Assn level
year
Relief Assn
City
Funding %
at Relief
Assn level
1997
1,800
1,200
166,540
2005
2700
1200
114.46%
1998
2,200
1,200
2006
3000
2600
126.63%
1999
2,700
1,200
131.39%
2007
3600
2600
116.11%
2000
3,400
1,200
90.13%
2008
3600
2600
96.20%
2001
2,700
1,200
96.34%
2009
3600
2600
108.04%
2002
2,700
1,200
79.15%
2010
3600
2600
115.23%
2003
2,700
1,200
92.02%
2011
36001
26001
108749%
2004
2,700
1,200 1
101.10%
2012 1
36001
26001
125.03%
Increases to the City guaranteed benefit level have been contemplated previously by the City
Council in 1994, 2006, and 2009, with a change made in 2006. The City did increase its
guaranteed level of support in 2006, along with an agreement to contribute 50% towards the
cost of the Relief Association's annual required financial audit. In 2009, that agreement was
increased to 60% of the annual audit cost, but no increase to the guaranteed benefit level was
made by the City.
The Finance Department has reviewed assets, investment earnings, and benefits payouts from
1999 forward. We have found that the fund has experienced investment losses in 36% of the
investment years as follows:
2000
$314,001
2001
189,554
2002
227,674
2008
354,150
2011
20,563
The Association has also experienced benefit payouts in excess of $100,000 in 64% of the
years since 1999 as follows:
2000
$127,275
2007
$114,302
2001
122,636
2008
198,570
2002
286,746
2009
166,540
2004
253,697
2011
127,848
2005
268,137
Investment losses and benefit payouts are outside the control of the City. As we evaluate
projections of future exposure, we use both average (or likely) scenarios as well as `worst
case' scenarios to assess the impact on future funding requirements, using the 130% funding
policy as a performance standard. The City has chosen the 130% level so as to minimize
potential exposure to an increased required municipal contribution brought on by the adverse
affects of a significant market adjustment combined with a significant payout in a single year.
Recommendation
The City has consistently followed a policy of guaranteed level of benefit which is supported by
a funding level of 130 %. With current Association assets /liabilities that funding policy supports
a guarantee not to exceed $3,150 for 2013. Five year projections at the requested $4,000
benefit level are not supported by the 130% funding factor.
Staff recommends that the City Council increase the City guaranteed benefit level from $2,600
per year of service to $3,150 per year of service and that the City contribute 65% of the annual
independent audit costs for the Cottage Grove Fire Relief Association in 2013.
Fire Relief Benefit and State Aid Comparisons
Lump -Sum plans
Shakopee
Rosemount
Woodbury
Golden Valley
Prior Lake
Lakeville
Maplewood
New Brighton
Inver Grove Heights
Oakdale
Hastings
Cottage Grove
Other plans
2008 2008 to 2010
2008 Benefit 2008 State aid municipal change in
level received contribution state aid
7,500
123,647
339,752
7,500
141,345
6,900
73,399
161,200
6,900
85,086
6,720
227,400
202,634
6,720
258,251
6,700
102,819
152,825
6,700
118,200
6,500
125,482
102,372
6,500
140,284
6,230
196,224
178,380
6,000
224,674
5,500
146,924
263,007
5,500
170,702
5,400
84,146
46,200
5,300
96,380
5,000
121,119
-
5,000
140,506
4,900
103,052
48,532
4,650
117,193
4,500
109,467
58,835
4,500
124,677
3,600
119,098
4,346
3,600
134,771
Brooklyn Center
7,500
98,752
65,945
7,500
115,983
Apple Valley
6,300
182,389
292,161
6,000
212,542
Eden Prairie
5,600
292,384
1,129,002
5,400
335,779
Chanhassen
5,050
104,474
94,032
5,050
115,928
Savage
5,021
92,440
184,514
4,827
104,592
Roseville
3,000
148,002
216,500
3,000
171,025
2010
2010 Benefit 2010 State aid municipal
level received contribution
187,451
152,000
20,000
92,071
117,600
46,200
28,000
3,551
258,000
411,221
12,500
184,514
128,975
2008 to 2010
change in
municipal
contribution
(17,698)
(11,687)
(30, 851)
(15,381)
(14, 802)
(28,450)
(23, 778)
(12,234)
(19,387)
(14,141)
(15,210)
(15,673)
(17,231)
(30,153)
(43, 395)
(11,454)
(12,152)
(23,023)
152,301
9,200
202,634
152,825
82,372
86,309
145,407
(28, 000)
48,532
58,835
795
65,945
34,161
717,781
81,532
87,525
RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -xxx
APPROVING A CHANGE TO THE COTTAGE GROVE FIREFIGHTER RELIEF
ASSOCIATION BYLAWS
WHEREAS, the paid on call firefighters employed by the City of Cottage Grove
are members of the Cottage Grove Firefighter Relief Association; and
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Cottage Grove does not have control
over the financial and investing activities for the Cottage Grove Firefighter Relief
Association; and
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Cottage Grove has a responsibility to
the taxpayers of the City to effectively manage the City's financial obligations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, approves a change to
the bylaws of the Cottage Grove Firefighter Relief Association at a lump sum
benefit amount of $3150 provided in appendix C of the bylaws.
Passed this 20th day of February, 2013.
Myron Bailey, Mayor
Attest:
Caron M. Stransky, City Clerk