HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-12-18 PACKET 04.M.REQUEST OF CITY COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL AGENDA
MEETING ITEM #�f
DATE 12/18/13 7
PREPARED BY: Community Development Jennifer Levitt
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT STAFF AUTHOR
**************�*******:�******�************:�****�
COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST
Consider approving the feasibility report and calling for a public hearing for the 2014 Pavement
Management (Districts F1 and F4) Project.
� :_ •►�ll_��� •►
Adopt the resolution approving the feasibility report and calling for a public hearing for the 2014
Pavement Management (Districts F1 and F4) Project.
BUDGET IMPLICATION: $ $
BUDGETED AMOUNT ACTUAL AMOUNT FUNDING SOURCE
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
� MEMO/LETTER: Memo from Jennifer Levitt dated 12/12/13
� RESOLUTION: Draft
❑ ORDINANCE:
❑ ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION:
❑ LEGAL RECOMMENDATION:
� OTHER: Notice of Public Hearing
2014 Pavement Management Project Feasibility Report
ADMINISTRATOR'S COMME
�
ity Administrator Date
**�*�***********��***��*�*********�*************
COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: ❑ APPROVED ❑ DENIED ❑ OTHER
CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE
� MINNESOTA
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Ryan Schroeder, City Administrator
From: Jennifer M. Levitt, P.E., City Engineer
Date: December 12, 2013
Re: 2014 Pavement Management, Districts F1 & F4
• Approve Feasibility Report
• Call for Public Improvement Hearing
Background
�
On September 4, 2013 the City Council authorized a feasibility report for the Pavement
Management Area as outlined in the Capital Improvement Plan for two areas: 1) Area bound by
east of Islay Avenue, north of Jareau Avenue, west of Jewel Avenue (District F1); 2) Area east
of and including Jergen Avenue, west of and including Jareau Avenue, south of 91 Street &
93 Street. The City Council held a workshop session on November 20, 2013 to discuss the
various elements of the proposed improvements. At the workshop, staff presented the pre-
liminary findings of several different tests that were completed on the existing pavement, sub-
grade, and utilities. Due to the poor pavement condition, along with good sub-grade soils and
curb condition, a full pavement replacement and spot curb replacement was recommended for
both areas.
A neighborhood meeting for this project was held on December 12, 2013 at 7:00 p.m. at Cottage
Grove Middle School. There were 20 people in attendance.
Discussion
Feasibility Report
On the basis of the Council's previous action, a feasibility report has been prepared. Upon this
analysis, the project is felt to be physically and financially feasible. The feasibility report is en-
closed for the Council's review.
Call for Public Improvement Hearinq
The public improvements associated with the 2014 Pavement Management Area will benefit
properties in the immediate area. Therefore, for the costs to be assessed to all benefited prop-
erties, it will be necessary to hold a public hearing for the project. A hearing date of January 15,
2014 will afford the necessary time to publish legal notices and send out letters to affected
property owners.
Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Ryan Schroeder
2014 Pavement Management, Districts F1 & F4
December 12, 2013
Page 2 of 2
Summarv of Road and Infrastructure Improvements
Road Rehabilitation: Full Road Reconstruction
The rehabilitation method proposed for the streets in District F1 and District F4 is to remove the
existing asphalt surface and replace it with a new surFace, which will consist of two lifts of
bituminous. Spot curb replacement will also be completed. Also proposed are some minor utility
improvements for sanitary sewer, water, street lights, and stormwater. The potential assessment
for the improvements listed above is estimated at $3031.66 per residential lot. The special
benefit appraisal will be completed by the end of December.
Project Fundinq Analvsis
The total project cost for the road work, utility, storm sewer, and park improvements is
$3,636,313. According to the City's policy, 45 percent of the total project cost for road work and
utilities is assessed against the benefiting properties. The total project value that is assessed
residentially is $1,555,239 for the Districts F1 and F4. The Cost Estimate Summary can be
viewed in Appendix C of the Feasibility Report.
Recommendation
It is recommended the Council adopt the attached resolution approving the feasibility report and
establishing a January 15, 2014 public improvement hearing date for the 2014 Pavement
Management Project, Districts F1 and F4.
RESOLUTION NO. 2013-XXX
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING FOR
A HEARING FOR THE 2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROJECT
(DISTRICTS F1 AND F4)
WHEREAS, pursuant to the resolution adopted by the City Council on September 4, 2013,
a report was authorized to be prepared by Bolton & Menk, Inc. for the 2014 Pavement
Management (Districts F1 and F4) Project; and
WHEREAS, the feasibility report has been prepared and does find the construction of said
improvements to be necessary, cost-effective, and feasible; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to assess the cost of said improvements to all benefited
properties.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove,
Washington County, Minnesota,
The feasibility report, which was prepared pursuant to Resolution No. 2013-084 for
the 2014 Pavement Management (Districts F1 and F4) Project, finds the
improvements to be necessary, cost effective, and feasible and is hereby approved.
2. The City Council will consider the improvement of such streets, sanitary sewer,
water main, storm sewer, storm water quality, and lighting in accordance with the
feasibility report and the assessment of benefitting property for all or a portion of the
cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, at an
estimated total cost of the improvement of $3,636,313.00.
3. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvements on the 15th day of
January 2014 in the Council Chamber of City Hall at 7:30 p.m. and the Clerk shall
give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by
law.
Passed this 18th day of December 2013.
Myron Bailey, Mayor
Attest:
Caron M. Stransky, City Clerk
CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT (DISTRICTS F1 AND F4) PROJECT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove,
Minnesota, will meet at 7:30 p.m. on January 15, 2014, at Cottage Grove City Hall, 12800 Ravine
Parkway South, Cottage Grove, Minnesota, to consider the making of an improvement on the
following streets, pursuant to Minn. Stat. Chapter 429.011 to 429.111:
District F1:
1. 91st Street S. from Islay Avenue S. to Jareau Avenue S.
2. 91 st Street S. from 91 st Street S. to cul-de-sac (8802-8856)
3. 91 st Street S. from 91 st Street S. to cul-de-sac (8862-8900)
4. Janie Avenue S. from 90th Street S. to 91 st Street S.
5. Janero Avenue S. from 90th Street S. to 91 st Street S.
6. Jareau Avenue S. from 90th Street S. to 91st Street S.
7. Jareau Avenue S. from Jareau Avenue S. to cul-de-sac (9021-9069)
8. Jareau Avenue S. from 91 st Street S. to 91 st Street S.
9. 91st Street S. from Jareau Avenue S. to Jeffery Avenue S.
10. Jasmine Avenue S. from 90th Street S. to 91st Street S.
11. Jasmine Court S. from Jasmine Avenue S. to cul-de-sac (9002-9018)
12. Jasmine Avenue S. from Jasmine Avenue S. to cul-de-sac (9047-9085)
13. Jasmine Avenue S. from 91st Street S. to cul-de-sac (9103-9140)
14. Jarvis Avenue S. from 91 st Street S. to 92nd Street S.
15. 92nd Street S. from Jarvis Avenue S. to Jeffery Avenue S.
16. Jeffery Avenue S. from 90th Street S. to 93rd Street S.
17. Jeffery Avenue S. from Jeffery Avenue S. to cul-de-sac (9029-9069)
18. Jeffery Avenue S. from Jeffery Avenue S. to cul-de-sac (9103-9153)
19. Jeffery Avenue S. from Jeffery Avenue S. to cul-de-sac (9203-9227)
20. Jeffery Court from Jeffery Avenue S. to cul-de-sac.
21. 93rd Street S. from Jeffery Avenue S. to Jergen Avenue S.
22. Jergen Avenue S. from 93rd Street S. to Jergen Bay S.
23. 92nd Street S. from Jergen Avenue S. to cul-de-sac
24. Jergen Court from Jergen Avenue S. to cul-de-sac
25. Jergen Bay from Jergen Avenue S. to cul-de-sac
26. Jergen Avenue S. from 90th Street S. to Jergen Bay S.
27. Jergen Avenue from Jergen Avenue S. to cul-de-sac (9061-9083)
28. Jensen Avenue S. from 90th Street S. to Jeffery Avenue S.
District F4:
1. Jareau Avenue S. from to 91 st Street S. to dead end (9499)
2. Jarrod Avenue S. loop from Jareau Avenue S. to Jareau Avenue S.
3. Jarrod Avenue S. from Jarrod Avenue S. to cul-de-sac (9337-9473)
4. 93rd Street S. from Jareau Avenue S. to Jasmine Avenue S.
5. Jasmine Avenue S. from Jeffery Avenue S. to cul-de-sac
6. Jeffery Bay S. from Jeffery Avenue S. to cul-de-sac
7. Jeffery Avenue S. from 93rd Street S. to cul-de-sac
8. Jergen Avenue S. from 93rd Street S. to dead end (9495)
9. Jergen Place S. from Jergen Avenue S. to cul-de-sac
The area proposed to be assessed for such improvements is the 2014 Pavement Management
(Districts F1 and F4) Area. The estimated total cost of the improvement is $3,636,313.00. A
reasonable estimate of the impact of the assessment will be available at the hearing. Such
persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this
meeting.
Individuals unable to attend the public hearing can make written comments by writing to Ryan
Schroeder, City Administrator, City of Cottage Grove, 12800 Ravine Parkway South, Cottage
Grove, MN 55016. Written comments must be received prior to the public hearing.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
/s
Published on January 1, 2014, and January 15, 2014,
.� BC�1._`°�'C�N $� M�N K, I NC�
. Consulting Engineers & Surveyors
" 2035 County Road D East • Suite B• Mapiewood, MN 55109-5314
Phone (651) 704-9970 • Fax (659) 704-9971
www.bolton-menk.corn
December 18, 2013
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Cityof Cottage Grove
12800 Ravine Parlcway South
Cottage Grove, MN 55016
RE: 2014 Pavement Management Project
BMI Project No. N15.106799
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members,
Enclosed for your review is the 2014 Pavement Management Project Feasibility Report. The project scope
includes street rehabilitation and utility repairs within paveinent district F 1 and a portion of F4, as
identified in this report.
This repoi�t describes the improvements necessary within the project area. Cost estimates for the proposed
improvements are presented in the Report.
We would be happy to discuss this report at your convenience. Please contact me at 651-968-7674 if you
have any questions.
Sincerely,
BOLTON & MENK, INC.
����"`.' ��
Mike Boex, PE
DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORKOW
Bolt�n & Menk is an equal opportunity employer
»""_. �, �► �
�
�a���l���� ���i����� & ���€����
Cottage
Grove
� Pride a�a QrosPerity Meefi
Feasibility Report
for
2014 Pavement Management Project
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
December 2013
Project Number N15.106799
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
FEASIBILITY REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Tableof Contents ...................................................................................................
Cei�tification ...........................................................................................................
Introduction............................................................................................................
E�sting Conditions — Disctricts F 1& F4 ................................................................
Streets..............................................................................................................
SanitarySewer ..................................................................................................
WaterMain ......................................................................................................
Storm Sewer
....................................................................................................
Proposed Improvements — Districts F 1& F4 ............................................................
Streets...............................................................................................................
SanitarySewer ..................................................................................................
WaterMain .......................................................................................................
StormSewer .....................................................................................................
StormWater Quality .........................................................................................
Proposed Improvements — Trail ...............................................................................
Permits and Easements ............................................................................................
EstimatedCosts .......................................................................................................
CostAllocation .................................................................................................
Financing..........................................................................................................
PublicHearing .........................................................................................................
Project Schedule ......................................................................................................
Conclusion And Recommendations .........................................................................
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project
................................ i
............................... ii
............................... 1
............................... 2
............................... 2
............................... 5
............................... 5
............................... 5
............................... 5
............................... 5
............................... 6
............................... 6
............................... 6
............................... 6
............................... 6
............................... 7
,...... ........................ 7
............................... 7
.............................. 8
.............................. 9
.............................. 9
.............................. 9
Table of Contents
Page i
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
APPENDIX
Appendix A— Existing Pavement Condition Photos
Appendix B — Figures
Figure 1 — Location Map
Figure 2— Streets - Year Constructed
Figure 3— Pavement Condition Rating
Figure 4 — Proposed Improvements
Figure 5 — Utility Repairs
Figure 6 — Assessable Parcels
AppendiY C— Cost Estimate Summary
Appendix D— Preliminary Assessment Roll
Appendix E —Pavement Condition Overview
Appendix F —Pavement Cores
AppendiY G —Falling Weight Deflectometer
Appendix H —Milling Test Areas
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, ar report was
prepared by me or under iny direct supervision, and that I
am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws
of the State of Miimesota.
By. � (
���i-•�-
Michael J. Boex, P.E.
License No. 44576
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Date: December 18, 2013
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota Certification
2014 Pa�ement Management Project Page ii
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
INTRODUCTION
The Hei�itage Estates Addition, Ridgewood 1 S through 7�' Additions, and the Knollwood 1 S` through 3 rd
Additions have been identified as candidates for rehabilitation during the 2014 construction season as a
part of the City of Cottage Grove's ongoing roadway rehabilitation program. The City Council authorized
preparation of this Report to determine the feasibility of rehabilitating those streets as a part of the 2014
Pavement Management Project.
These residential neighborhoods are located east of Jamaica Avenue and south of 90`�' Street and are pai�t
of Pavement Management District F 1 and a portion of F4, as shown on Figure 1 located in Appendix A.
There are thirty-seveiz residential streets within these neighborhoods totaling approximately 26,000 lineal
feet.
The purpose of this report is to further evaluate the work required for tlus street rehabilitation project, to
provide an estimate of cost, and to establish a method of cost allocation or assessment in or•der to
determine the physical and economic feasibility.
This feasibility report examines the following street segments:
District F 1:
1. 91 Street So. from Islay Avenue So. to Jareau Avenue So.
2. 91S` Street So. from 91 Street So. to cul-de-sac (8802-8856)
3. 91S` Street So. fi•om 91 Street So. to cul-de-sac (8862-8900)
4. Jane Avenue So. from 90 Street So. to 91S` Street So.
5. Janero Avenue So. fi•om 90`�' Street So. to 91 Street So.
6. Jareau Avenue So. from 90`�' Street So. to 91S` Street So.
7. Jareau Avenue So. from Jareau Avenue So. to cul-de-sac (9021-9069)
8. Jareau Avenue So. from 91 Street So. to 91 Street So.
9. 91 Street So. from Jareau Avenue So. to Jeffery Avenue So.
10. Jasmine Avenue So. from 90` Street So, to 91 Street So.
11. Jasmine Court So. from Jasmine Avenue So. to cul-de-sac (9002-9018)
12. Jasmine Avenue So. fi•om Jasinine Avenue So. to cul-de-sac (9047-9085)
13. Jasmine Avenue So. from 91 Street So. to cul-de-sac (9103-9140)
14. Jarvis Avenue So. from 91S` Street So. to 92" Street So.
15. 92" Street So. fi•om Jaivis Avenue So. to Jeffery Avenue So.
16. Jeffery Avenue So. from 90 Street So. to 93r Street So.
17. Jeffery Avenue So. from Jeffery Avenue So. to cul-de-sac (9029-9069)
18. Jeffery Avenue So. fi•om Jeffery Avenue So. to cul-de-sac (9103-9153)
19. Jeffery Avenue So. from Jeffery Avenue So. to cul-de-sac (9203-9227)
20. Jeffery Court fi•om Jeffery Avenue So. to cul-de-sac.
21. 93` Street So. from Jeffery Avenue So. to Jergen Avenue So.
22. Jergen Avenue So. from 93r Street So. to Jergen Bay So.
23. 92° Street So. from Jergen Avenue So. to cul-de-sac
24. Jergen Court from Jergen Avenue So. to cul-de-sac
25. Jergen Bay from Jergen Avenue So. to cul-de-sac
26. Jergen Avenue So. from 90�' Street So. to Jergen Bay So.
27. Jergen Avenue fi�om Jergen Avenue So. to cul-de-sac (9061-9083)
28. Jensen Avenue So. from 90 Street So. to Jeffery Avenue So.
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project
i _ _.
� _
Page 1
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
District F4:
1. Jareau Avenue So. from to 91S Street So. to dead end (9499)
2. Jarrod Avenue So. loop from Jareau Avenue So. to Jareau Avenue So.
3. Jarrod Avenue So. from Jarrod Avenue So. to cul-de-sac (9337-9473)
4. 93r Street So. from Jareau Avenue So. to Jasmine Avenue So.
5. Jasinine Avenue So. from Jeffery Avenue So. to cul-de-sac
6. Jeffery Bay So. from Jeffery Avenue So. to cul-de-sac
7. Jeffery Avenue So. froin 93r Street So. to cul-de-sac
8. Jergen Avenue So. from 93r Street So. to dead end (9495)
9. Jergen Place So. from Jergen Avenue So. to cul-de-sac
EXISTING CONDITIONS - DISCTRICTS F1 & F4
STREETS
The streets witlun District F 1 and F4 are tuban-residential and were originally constructed in the late
1980's and early 1990's. The exceptions are the Ridgewood l s Addition (1979) and Ridgewood 7�'
Addition (1997). Generally, the streets are 32 feet wide (from face of curb to face of curb) with concrete
curb and gutter. Prior to the Wal-Mart development, Jeffery Avenue had been classified as a collector
roadway between 90 Street and its southernmost stub with the intent that it would be extended in the
firture. As a part of the Wal-Mart project, a permanent cul-de-sac was constructed on the southern plat
line of Ridgewood S Addition and the collector classification effectively removed. This former collector
street is approximately 44 feet wide (from face of curb to face of curb) with concrete curb and gutter.
A visual inspection was performed in 2013 to evaluate pavement surface conditions. The inspection
determined the paveinent rating of these streets generally range from 50-60. Pavements in the lower end
of that range are considered fair and generally have major distress. In contrast, the 1994 Pavement
Management Plan depicted PCI's (Pavement Condition Index) in the range of 74-100. Per that plan,
PCPs in those ranges are classified as "Very Good" to "Excellent". Since 1994, pavement condition has
continued to deteriorate and much of the pavements have distress and are "Fair". Figure 2 depicts the age
of the streets within the neighborhood and Figure 3 depicts the visual pavement rating for each street
segment. In addition, there are sections of existing curb and gutter that have settled, cracked, or have
other defects that will require replacement. Appendix A contains some representative photos of the
existing pa�ement condition.
It should be noted that the visual surface rating is a preliminary indicator of condition and potential
rehabilitation techniques; it should not automatically dictate the final maintenance or rehabilitation.
Factors such as traffic projections, pavement strength, and paveinent structure condition should also be
considered.
PAVEMENT CORES
Coring of the pavement was performed to determine the thicicness of the existing street section and
evaluate pavement condition. From the cores, it can be seen that the average section consists of 3-4
inches of bitiiminous over 7-8 inches of gravel.
`�� ��::� �' ``'� ���
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project Page 2
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Existing Street Section
No. Location Bituminous (in) Aggregate Base (in) Condition
1 8859 91 Street 4" 6" *(Upper 1.5")
2 9099 Janero Avenue 3.25" 6.5" Good
3 9088 Jareau Avenue 3.75" 10.5" *(Upper 2")
4 9019 Jasmine Avenue 4.5" 8" Good
5 9022 Jeffeiy Avenue 4.25" 7" *(Entire depth, broken)
6 9063 Jensen Avenue 3.75" 10.25" Good
7 9044 Jergen Avenue 3" 8" Good
8 9150 Jarvis Avenue 3.75" 8" *(Upper 2")
9 9154 Jeffery Avenue 4.5" 9" *(Upper 2")
10 9128 Jeigen Court 3.75" 5.5" Good
11 9279 Jeigen Avenue 3.25" 7.75" *(Entire depth, brolcen)
12 9247 Jeffery Avenue 3.75" 8" *(Upper 2.5")
13 9334 93` Sn•eet 3.25" 7.5" *(Entire depth, brolcen)
14 9444 93` Sh�eet 3.25" 6.25" *(Upper 2")
15 9116 Jergen Bay 3.75" 6.75" Good
16 9487 92° Street 2,38" 7.13" *(Bottom 1")
17 9337 Jeffery Court 4.00" 6.00" *(Entire depth, broken)
18 9170 Jareau Avenue 3.13" 8.88" *(Entire depth)
19 9411 Jareau Avenue 3.25" 7.25" *(Entire depth, broken)
20 9340 Jarrod Avenue 3.00" 9.00" *(Upper 1.5")
21 9373 Jasmine Avenue 3.50" 8.00" *(Upper 2", broken)
22 9426 Jeffeiy Avernie 3.13" 7.38" *(Entire depth, brolcen)
23 9448 Jergen Place 4.25" 6.25" *(Entire depth)
24 9338 Jergen Avenue 3.50" 7.50" Good
Average 3.58" 7.60"
* Asphalt stripping observed (varying severity), depths noted.
Seventeen of the twenty-four cores displayed degradation due to stripping, which is generally described
as the separation of aggi•egate from the asphalt due to moishire. The stripping found degrades the strengtll
and durability of the pavement. Seven of the cores were noted as brolcen, meaning the stripping was
severe enough that the top layer of bituminous fell apart as the core was extracted. The locations of
stripping coincided with areas where Public Works has performed extensive maintenance via temporaiy
overlays and patching. The stripping appears to occur in irregular patterns, however it appears to Ue inost
severe in the pavement of the 1990's. Pictures of two pavement cores can be seen in Appendix F.
_ _ __
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project Page 3
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
ADDITIONAL TESTING
Due to the results of the cores and previous maintenance expended, the City decided to perform additional
testing of the pavement to evaluate strength and condition of the pavement structure. Two additional
testing methods were performed:
1. Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD)
2. Milling of test strips
The falling weight deflectometer (FWD) is a non-destructive process used to evaluate pavement structural
condition by providing an lll-situ characterization of the pavement layer stiffness. The FWD applies
dynamic loads to a pavement surface, simulating the magnitude and duration of a single wheelload. The
downward movement (vertical deflection) of the pavement at various distances from the loading plate are
measured with various sensors. These measurements help determine the overall pavement load rating,
pavement layer characteristics and material properties (modulus), and subgrade strength characteristics
(in-situ R-value). Detailed FWD results are listed in Appendix G.
Milling of test strips was performed in order to evaluate the feasibility of a mill-overlay. Twelve test
areas were milled to a depth of approximately 2-inches. These test strips were approximately 7.5-feet
wide and 25 to 50-feet long. The purpose of the test strips was to determine the quantity and severity of
cracl�ing below the pavement surface and visually evaluate the underlying pavement condition. Ideally,
milling the surface pavement will reinove surface distress and reduce both the number and severity of
cracks in the remaining pavement, reducing the need for joint repair and subsequent reflective cracking.
Pictures of the test mill strips are located in Appendix H.
ADDITIONALTESTING SUMMARY
The FWD testing provides a pavement stiffness quantified as a modulus. With a few exceptions, the
modulus of the bit�iminous layers intact (and without stripping) was much higher than those with severe
stripping. However, due to the sandy subgrade soils and good aggregate base, the pavement structure as a
whole tested structurally sound. Therefore, the issue facing the City is functional and not structural —
meaning the recurrence of inaintenance issues due to the relatively weak stripped pavement material
raveling and breaking apart.
The rislcs typical of all mill overlay projects, i.e. reflective cracking and the associated maintenance
required were evaluated to determine acceptable risk levels. In nine of the twelve test mill areas, milling
was performed to evaluate the feasibility of removing the upper 2" of stripped material which was
typically the most severe. In eight of those nine areas it was determined that the remaining pavement
posed risk for excessive cracking, thul pavement layers, or raveling in the base course. In the three
remaining test areas where stripping was not present, two displayed more severe cracking in the
bituininous base course increasing the potential volume of reflective cracking.
2013 IMPROVEMENTS
In the suminer of 2013, permanent cul-de-sacs were constructed at the ends of Jasmine and Jeffery
Avenue. The parcels adjacent to the new cul-de-sacs are considered a part of this pavement management
project, are receiving benefit, and are therefore participating in the assessment. The costs to construct the
cul-de-sacs are not included in this report and are therefore a cost savings to the project and subsequent
assessments.
� s�--� �
� u;�� � ;� � ,_'��,�� ` s _ _
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project Page 4
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
SANITARY SEWER
The sanitaiy sewer system within the District F1 consists primarily of 8-inch VCP and PVC. The only
exception to this is a 12-inch reinforced concrete pipe on Jasmine Avenue between 91 Street and 90�'
Street. The existing sanitary sewer has been televised to evaluate pipe condition. The televising reports
show that the pipe is in good condition. However, some problems encountered in the existing sanitary
sewer were root intrusion, cracked pipe and sags. Miscellaneous structure repairs including patching,
lining, and other repairs were noted during the inspections.
WATER MAIN
The water mains within the project area consist of 6, 8, and 24-inch diameter ductile iron pipe. The mains
were installed in conjunction with the development of the neighborhoods. The water mains are believed
to be in good condition. However, a valve within Heritage Estates recently had the bolts replaced due to
excessive corr•osion and it's believed other valves in the area may be in a similar condition. Additionally,
there are expected to be some valves which are not operational and will need to be addressed with the
project. The valves will be operated and evaluated by Public Works prior to the start of the project.
STORM SEWER
The existing storm sewer has been televised to determine pipe condition and necessary repairs. In
addition, storm structures were also inspected. Storm sewer mains are generally in good condition.
However, soine problems encountered in the existing storm sewer were craciced or broken pipes and dirty
lines. Miscellaneous structure patching, lining, and other repairs were noted during the inspections.
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS - DISTRICTS F1 & F4
STREETS
Due to the range of pavement ages within Districts F 1 and F4, two primary rehabilitation methods would
typically be pj•oposed, pavement replacement and mill-overlay. However, due to the observed depth and
extent of the pavement stripping in the cores, the results of FWD and test milling, and extent of previous
City maintenance, a inill and overlay is not recommended at this time. While some streets may be able to
successfully accept a mill-overlay, there does not appear to be a logical break within the project limits
since the stripping is relatively random and severity of cracking in the base course varies greatly.
Therefore, the project area was viewed as a whole for future maintenance and system management. If
broken up into individual segments, each roadway segment would perform differently and requu•e
different maintenance at different times since each rehabilitation has its own lifecycle.
Due to tlle types of distress present in the existing pavement, the anticipated acceleration of deterioration
due to asphalt stripping, and risks presented in previous sections of this report, the streets within F 1 and
F4 are proposed to undergo a full pavement removal and replacement with 3.5 inches of new pavement.
Since the concrete curb and gutter is generally in good condition, it is proposed to undergo spot
replacement. The curb in poor coudition will be evaluated for removal just prior to construction, but
preliminary estimates indicate that 8-10% will need to be removed and replaced. Where conditions are
favorable, the goal is that the concrete curb and gutter last two pavement lifecycles. The wear course is
proposed to be virgin mix, excluding the use of recycled asphalt pavement (RAP).
In locations where curb is replaced in fi�ont of driveways, curb will be removed and replaced and each
driveway would be patched the entire width with in-Icind matej•ials as a part of the street rehabilitation
process. Due to the nature of spot curb replacement, this patch typically extends a few feet behind the
curb. Concrete pads fot• the community mailboxes will also be replaced as a part of this project.
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project Page 5
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Restoration is anticipated to consist of screened Premium Topsoil Borrow with a blown compost top-
dressing and seed.
Traffic signs are proposed to be replaced as a part of this project to meet federal retrareflectivity
requirements. In addition, signs will be evaluated for conformance to the adopted City sign policy and
signs will be removed or supplemented as required.
SANITARY SEWER
Inline repairs are recommended to address cracks within the pipe. Where there are sags with a history of
back-ups, it is recommended that the pipe be removed and replaced. The sanitary sewer manhole castings
will be salvaged and reinstalled. The existing concrete adjusting rulgs will be replaced with new HDPE
adjusting rings conform to current City standards.
WATER MAIN
It is proposed that brolcen valve top sections be removed and replaced as a part of tlus proj ect. In the
Heritage Estates Addition, it is proposed that the valves be dug up and checked for bolt corrosion and
replaced if necessary. As a part of tlus process, the valve box should be replaced in conjunction with that
work. Also, there are soine hydrants that should be adjusted. It is proposed to extend the hydrant barrel
on each of these hydrants. Finally, concrete hydrant access pads are proposed to be installed at all
hydrants in accordance with current City standards.
STORM SEWER
Generally speaking, the intent of this project is to rehabilitate the streets and not change existing drainage
patterns. In-line repairs are recommended to address cracks, and leaking or offset joints. Structures in
poor condition will be replaced to conform to current city standards. Adjustment rings for manholes will
be replaced with HDPE rings. Catch basin rings will not be replaced ui�less the curb adjacent to them is
removed, or failure of the rings has occurred. The existing castings will be salvaged. Miscellaneous
structt�re patching, lining, and other repairs will be performed as needed.
Public Works staff provided input on areas with historic drainage concerns. No inajor flooding or
drainage issues were noted; therefore only minor curb grade inodifications and valley gutter installations
are proposed to facilitate drainage.
Drainage iinmediately adjacent to 90�' Street will be addressed as a part of a future 90`�' Street project.
STORM WATER QUALITY
Storm water quality improvements are not required in this neighborhood due to no increase of impervious
surfacing.
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS - TRAIL
There is a wood-chip trail planned for the green space between the residential neighborhood and Wal-
Mart. This trail is proposed to be constructed in the firture once additional destinations and trail
connections are available. Therefore, no improveinents are proposed as a part of this project.
Like the drainage issues along 90 Street, improveinents to the bituininous trail adjacent to 90`� are
anticipated to be addressed when 90�' Street is rehabilitated.
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project Page 6
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
PERMITS AND EASEMENTS
Because the roadway construction is considered a maintenance project that would not create any new
impervious surfaces and would not change the existing grade, hydraulics, or puipose of the roadway, the
Phase II General Storm Water Permit from the MPCA would not be required for that portion of the work.
It should be noted that the future trail north of Walmart will require the following permits when that
project moves forward:
. Northern Natural Gas Pipeline encroachment agreement or permit for trail construction
. MCES encroachment agreement or permit for trail construction
. NPDES Phase II General Storm Water Permit if the ar•ea of disturbance is greater than one acre
No additional drainage and utility easements are anticipated in the neighborhoods, however, this will be
evaluated during the final design phase of the proj ect.
ESTIMATED COSTS
Cost estimates for the improvements have been prepared and are included in the Appendix of this repart.
All costs for items to be constructed are based on anticipated unit prices for the 2014 construction season.
All costs include a thirty (30) percent allowance for indirect costs associated with the project
(engineering, administrative, fmancing, and legal) as well as a ten (10) percent contingency. No costs are
included for capitalized interest during the construction period or before assessments are levied.
Following is an overall summary of the estimated costs:
Estimated Cost Summary
Location Estimated Project Cost
Pavement Replacement $3,636,312.68
Total Estimated Project Cost: $3,636,312.68
Costs presented include 10% contingency + 30% indirect costs
COST ALLOCATION
Assessments for tlus project will be based upon the "Infrastructure Maintenance Task Force Special
Assessment Policy For Public Improvements," dated September 30, 2005, Revised August 8, 2012. All
adjacent benefiting properties are proposed to be assessed. Per the Urban Residential policy, 45% of the
project cost for both surface and subsurface improvements would be assigned to each individual
residential lot on a unit basis. The intent of the City's policy is to treat all properties within a residential
development as similar individual units regardless of lot fi•ontage. The amount assessed is based on the
City standard street section even if the width is greater. City funds would be responsible for the
remaining 55% of the project costs.
Per the policy, City-owned property was evaluated in the saine manner as commercial/industrial lots
where 100% of the project costs adjacent to the property are assessed. In areas where residential property
was on the opposite side of the street of City property, half of the street width was assigned to the
residential area and the other half to the City. The estimated project assessments are as follows:
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project Page 7
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
CITY-OWIVED PROPERTY:
Estimated Cost Allocation
Estimated
Estimated Total Cl � Total Sfreet City
Property Adj ustment
Street Project Cost Property
Location Front for Half of
��Costs* CostY* Adjacent to � Assessment
� Footage Street*r* o
� ($/1� � City Property (100 /o of
Total)
F1 &F4—Pavement $97.69 $139.70 20 $2,793.94 $1,396.97 $1,396.97
Replacement
Totals: $1,396.97
* Construction Cost, includes Street & Utilities
** Total Project Cost (10% Contingency + 30% Indirect)
'k** Includes 50% reduction for property on one side of the street
URBAN RESIDENTIAL LAND USE:
Estimated Cost Allocation
Location Other Funds * Assessed Amount Estimated
(45% of Total) Project Cost
F1 & F4 — Pavement Replacement $2,081,073.50 $1,555,239.18 $3,636,312.68
Totals: $2,081,073.50 $1,555,239.18 �3,636,312.68
* See Appendix C for N'und 13reakout. lncludes (:�ty iunds.
Estimated Cost Per Unit
' Assessable Assessed Cost Special Benefit
Assessed Amount
Location RSLE Per RBLE Unit Appraisal
(45% of Total)
Units Per Polic
F1 & F4 — Pa�ement Replacement 513 $1,555,239.18 $3,031.66
Single Family: $3, 031. 66 $TBD
Should the calculated assessment exceed the special benefit appraisal, the single-family assessments will
be proposed to be capped at the amount of the special benefit appraisal. If needed, City funds will cover
the difference between the calculated assessinent and the benefit appraisal.
FINANCING
Assessments are proposed to be levied based on the City's current assessment policy. The remainder of
the project would be financed through a combination of City funds such as the General Tax Levy and
Enterprise funds for items such as storm sewer improvements. Figure 6 depicts the assessable parcels for
the project.
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project Page 8
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC HEARING
Because the properties within the project area benefit from the proposed improvements, and the project
will be partially funded through assessment, it will be necessary for the City to hold a public
improvement hearing to receive comment on the proposed project and to determine further action to be
taken.
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Below is the proposed schedule assuming starting construction in 2014:
� 09/04/2013 Council Orders Feasibility Report
� 11/20/2013 Council Workshop
• 12/12/2013 Hold Neighborhood Meeting
� 12/18/2013 Council Receives and Approves Feasibility Report
Council Sets a Public Improvement Hearing Date
� Ol/15/2014 Council Holds Public Improvement Hearing
Council Or•dei•s the preparation of the Plans and Specifications
• 03/OS/2014 Council Approves the Plans and Specifications
• 04/03/2014 Project Bid Date
• 04/16/2014 Contract Award
• Spring 2014 Begu1 Consh•uction
• September 2014 Complete Construction
• September 2014 Council sets Assessment Hearing Date
• October 2014 Council l�olds Assessment Hearing
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
It is recommended that this report be used as a guide for the layout, design, and cost allocation for the
public improvements. It is fiirther recommended that the owneis of properties within the project limits be
notified of the proposed improvements in order to provide comment.
To determine project feasibility, a comparison was made between the costs estimated herein and the costs
experienced for other similar projects within the City. These comparisons, on a per linear foot
construction cost basis (no indu•ect project costs), are shown in the following table:
�
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project
Page 9
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Cost per Unit Comparison
2014 Pavement Management Project (Estimated) $97.69
2013 Pavement Management Project (Bid Results)
District C1 & District C2 — Pavement Replacement Area $151.18
District C2 — Mill & Overlay Area $94.09
2011 Pavement Management Project (Bid Results)
Pine Coulee/Countrywood $68.49
Howard's Addition $63.18
2010 Pavement Management Project - River Acres (Bid Results) $69.14
2008 Pa�ement Management Project (Bid Results) $96.00
From the tabulation above, it can be seen that the cost to rehabilitate in the pavement replacement areas
are less than the costs froin the 2013 Pavement Management Project. This is primarily due to the fact that
the existing concrete curb and gutter is nl better shape with less anticipated replacement and therefore less
impact to existing driveways and boulevards. In addition, because the curb is being left in place, placing
street light wire in conduit is not being proposed. In fact, curb damage is estimated to be less than 2013's
mill & overlay area.
In contrast, flle costs are slightly higher than 2011 due to the fact that this project includes streets with
concrete curb and gutter and public sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and water main repairs. In addition, the
street widths are significantly wider than the rural residential streets from 2010 and 2011.
The project is financially feasible, with funding sources identified from the City as well as the benefited
properties adjacent to the project. Financial responsibilities have been determined based on estimated
project costs as well as adopted City policy.
From an engineering standpoint, this project is feasible, necessary, and cost effective.
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project Page 10
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Appendix A
Existing Pavement Condition Photos
Cottage
J Grove
� Prlde andPrOSPerity Meet
I
�
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
�- � _� �µ_. �
��., . _ 1
;
.,,�. .. : ,
,., ,. -... _ ,
; � `° _ _ �
_�_ � _ ,
� - � -�
: -,a_ : ,
� ,..x^^".. . .. ; , . , �
'�., . . . - . . . . .� ,
. � _ � .. . t _ ; . - . , ._;., , .,
, . . ..�,., . .�-�^
�+"
_ - ,
- � --- . �¢?� � . . - .
�_:�: _ - � . . . � . . � ,
�".-. _ .. - - -- .
K�. � �. .,._ _ �..__ _ _ � _. . _ __ �__ _ ��- _ _ . � _ � .`_ A _ ��
��
District Fl
Approximate Location: 91S Street cul-de-sac.
Smaller cracking pattern present near curb, evidence of prior patching.
-_ �
� . _— �. �
� � �.�`- :�
; .
$,._ "�,: �,�
, .
�. : . ,.
.
.. . ,, : � . _: � .,_
� : ���� ' �.�,'E
� �� � �`�- :;�
� ' ��"' n
� :.+:�
_ _ `�i
F : ;;
,� x,
� _ _ �
� " i :l
'�.�: i�' . [ ' .
� •
.- `
:.. _ " _ . -��!
C': y ' �:{
_ -_ f $ `�,'�", '��,�
_ i
F ' _ � - `�.. � '_
i
F��' _. , ., �.. ,�_ , _.� _ . ... _ ...� . _ � . _. ._ . . .�.. _ __.,
*� �i
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project
District Fl
Approximate Location: 91 Street cul-de-sac.
Irregular block cracking with open cracks (approximately 1.5").
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
District Fl
Approximate Location: Jareau Ave cul-de-sac.
Early s�ns of stripping (small holes of seal coa� stri in of .
.... � � ��S -- �
�. iri 4y:�v � �_?��
'���: }
�R� . _ '. �' ! . r
.A.�i �',. '�.'° -.
�.ir i�,aY
„ = ' .. . .. . � �[ t7
C � . ���
� _ �.: `
� � . -
� . � ,ti -
� ,?` . , i M ' ,X �
, �;� V^ h. " ,4 _
t: I Y , t (
t - -�
y ! Y 'r �
�
o �
� n `J
� ..;^ ' ..�
`. ' �t �
� S rJ ' - � S� * � L �.�
�. `._ . . . .� , . . . . � _ �. _ , � . _ _ .. __. _ .. .� _ __ � ��
I
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project
District Fl
Approximate Location: 91 Street west of Janero Ave.
Blow patching present along street to patch deteriorating pavement.
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
District Fl
Approximate Location: Jeffery Avenue approaching 90` Street
� �a,..
` �;�; }:
� : �. ��;
i s-.
,� ��
t
��
�
_ ' � { r i
, — �
, , : � _ _. . .
c =: t ' s
E ` { �
- f
r• � � :s
L ��_ ._.r . .. . _. �_- . ._.._ �.�.__"_v �� .. .
�� -�x�
_;
� ��i
'°� ; �
� ��:
4'�r
.�
as
�' ���
f
�+ 'r.l
S
��� ".�
Y�¢`� _ _ .. __ _ _ .__�
District Fl
Approximate Location: Jasmine Avemie cul-de-sac
Extensive crackin� due to pavement a�in� is evident.
..e:� ,�
l: — � � _.. .�_. -:: ..
`?-�------' �
�... .. . _ . . . . � � ._���
't . .� - = .
t _. '. �,� . . . .. .. '4,+,+.
;. .. . ., ; . . ..
, �
'.._.'. . - .. . ... _ . , .�
i .. . . . �.... .. , ;,., . � .,, �
€: '
, ., > .
K � � � ,}.'� .
} ; `. �� . i . .
f F : ;� 'K
p,i�, - z ' y� .., � '
k ; j` l
F'-� ,,,:J" � ��t � _
: }.
G,. .,,,, • . � 4}
B , r
��-��. �.._ .. a � _... _ _ `_ _. ��' _ _ _. � _ ... . _.�.._ ...__ .. .. " ` _'."" _ __' _ _ ..
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
District Fl
Approximate Location: 9032 Jareau Avenue
. �
",.. , _ _ - - k'"".'' �`� -`""�,� �
., s :�
} ; _,
_ `�;� - -
'•
't`
�
_ C , �'
_ y . �, �"' � } -,` ` ..
S 5
� ^Fr }
1 � r
4
-�: I ' ) _.' ! `_ _
1 �: � ......_ a. __�.1'. ..... .._ _._. ... 1�. _r. ._ . _ .._. _. � ___ '_. —._'__
District Fl
Approximate Location: 93r Street east of Jeffery Avenue
� _ _ ___. _
�
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
��
� . �
� :�`
�:.. , _ .
t ..
;;�
:w
District Fl
Approximate Location: Jergen Court
�;'"''� -;� _ - �
� . , _: � �; .,. �
�
_ . , �t
; : .. _ �,
i _ �
,:. ..
_ •,
.: _, x
� _ , � :,
� ._
. . ._ . = - •- -• :-;._,
-- , _._ . . . . _
- j �v
_ . ,
,�
.
, . ,. . : •� :. ., : . i
' i � : i
-
- --
—
_ _
_ ;•,,
I'
- ' �
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project
n�str��t Fi
Approximate Location: Jeffery Court
Blow patching of stripped pavement.
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
District F4
Approximate Location: 93 Street and Jasinine Avenue intersection
Stripping and patching of the existing pa�ement. Seal coat peeling off pavement.
District F4
Approximate Location: 9301 Jareau Avenue
Extensive stripping and patching of the existi
�- ;�'..
�. - �
�� � . � � -
.` . -_. �
� ~`
� `
� ,
��- �� ,
i - -
�
�.�
' ;
+ -
_ M - 1 j�;�T .
L
�
�
_._. � �� .�� _. � ._..., _ . __._. . ..,. _ ' . . _ _ .. _ . _ ., � .� . _ . _ _�__ '�.... _ �
i
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
District F4
Approximate Location: 9336 Jeffery Avenue
Extensive stripping and multiple patching/overlays of the
, . 4 . �fl � �. `. . . _
}, }
' �
�� �.
isting pavement over time.
. �� � ,'
� �� ' ' / :
��` �r � f = `:. �
�� ig'F' , �, `� — L .
�1�� �._.2�?'-.�'°" e0'.
RA �_
Me�c'�
��
r :'' .
.L�' �
� 'C`'F
-S .`
f� *
t�� i '
� � �J
�� ..
_ '.. _ �
��:, :
Y
District F4
Approximate Location: 9492 Jarrod Avenue
Strippin and patching of the existing pavement.
�����= � . ��:.
� � - _��. � ��
rr=a 1 ; S 4
� . . -� '+.'�- �i ,8, �� _
�����
_ ��� �
t �`
;V`,�ri.
[L
+ ri�
:Z.,� 'sse±�,.�T":��i�;�,"'��"�tx �;�;��� ._, ��_aec
%n:. , .�,
� � �b �
y .�
?' �.::'
s
w.
�'dF_� J
_-..;;�`?^�
� �
: �. �...�. .:
•� � �a! �r 'S[ .::iP. �' _
�s�,��a �� � 7 i;•
2
, ...... . .. ...... .... . ....... .
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Curb to remain
Crack is tight and there is no settlement or differential movement. Curb is functional.
� - � ,, ., � s
, � . '�+�c. ,'ri+ .-�S�^+Fx"':'�i"<�'�t `�`;j '�.7hr::�i'`�?:1
�. � �.:;, . . - . - . _ . '.
f � •' � � � . � ' '.
�
� � "'
� r �
� r
_ � . � . ` . 4 � , y
� Y 1 � !- t I
r ; :.. t f k ,'r.l
� • ` �' `
� F i- � �
t � 4 { r ' f F _
I 4 � \
i T �(
_ 'r �. � ) �- , y . -�. !I
_ ,�4� .i�� {:"�
P 1�.�, y1 ��
_ .{�'; F _�� �E ��� Y -�.F�^.
: . t ,, ! ,
. _ . ... \ � _ �
�_- ._ '�. . { ,Y..__._—��— — ��. ......-_ _ �_�� —�? � "�J
� ti
ti �L
Curb to be replaced
Curb that is cracked in multiple locations, has settled, or has raveled and open joints is proposed to be
���' . , _ � r ' _ �i
� � a ��Y� ��;:i —�:,. `_ � �; � A; � �,F���b�
� `� �
j c . :'° � - . ,� . " ' .. -.- � • , . . -� �
, � ± � yiy+ ���, Ar t � , �
t
� '�"�%r�t � 1 i� �+�ry �r j',' V�'
1, y �
` � 1: . �.} ff '�-, � � ' � '�' �,.'.. 1 ! �
., y y r, .- i; t ^.r
r ��, ' . � ` � � ; �
r'� !� x' � �:Z�
'�� f � �- � ' '+;� r , '"� � -c ; g ..
t � � , ' ; � " '` `
`,;'� � � v � - s �-, i ; � � . �
i i t � � I�; � � � x t., 1 } I �. �� � A' ��„�
i ' ' ' t i � � . f C �,
( ,� ' . i 4 1 7 � .. � .� �� � I �' ,`L4 ' r��.
l.s�;.�.._ .r._.�"�ke.. ._�u�i_., �� �.c ... . ., ,y .�,...:.,e�_�.\.�'l.}ra�l..ri. 6 ,r�. . L.._.
I . ...... ... ..._. _ _.__. ._. .
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Appendix 6
Figures
Cottage
J Grove
� Pride ana P�osperity Meet
�. F - �r�_
� °---� ' _ _
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project
I ///��� Jl �� �
��� f,y '��; ,
� � i /'
�
rT
J �� , l � �//
i � t_� /
�i��� �==, /%
, � � --� �����
�
��/'' ; �
P �O'� �/
��/
.................� ,P/ /
\ �
Y ��\
,.��.� �j ��
A `� %�/ i
� � o
�� \\\ %
�/ �\ � �� <
// � �„ \\.` ��\ 5
l � v \ �
\ "s
���� �
.\\ \\..
\\\\\�\. i
�'�. \ i i � �" j �`
�/�\< ,
. � i , � �i
_�.
., ��/ ��\�,
, ..,
� �
� — , .............
,
-�........
i
� ,
� �
90TH STREEf SO.
0
L _� r i . � �I
n �
L� f � �
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
\
0 � � I�^fil
// � I'��-::..^ J
.... / \, \ -._-
�
�-�._�
�.___/ �)
����, ,
�_
� �
_--- �
' I
�
/�\ `
I
0
i�����u�auu��a[.��
f[d
�Q L�- I � �"�
1 � � �,�: s
NJ ... . ^
r�?
/VIi1 BOLTO M
Consulfing Enginaers & Surveyors
0
0
�
90TH S�REET 50.
LEGEND:
� CONSTRUCTED 1979
CONSTRUCTED 1987
CONSTRUCTED 1988
" CONSTRUCTED19S9
� CONSTRUCiED 1990
�"- �! CONSTRUCTED 1991
� CONSTRUCTED 1993
� CONSTRUCTED 1994
...._._... CONSTRUCTED1997
•••••• NEIGHBORHOODBOUNDARY
— PAVEMENT DISTRIC�
NOTE:
HERITNGE ESTATES AOOITION AND PI�GEWOOD STH
ADDITION WE0.E CONSTNURED IN lVJO PHASES
PAVEMENT CORES:
X"/Y": EX. BIT. THICKNESS / DEPTH OF STRIPPING
x � � PAVEMENTCORE
A- L TEST MILL LOCATION �
COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEM ENT PROIER
Cl�y of
� Cottage Grove °�
Horizontal Scale In Feet
Minnesola
� ; ��/� � � ��,� ~�__ ��-�; ,�
✓ v ,�:
j �� n � , \, �`��/��. --- — � �� �
�- ��i �`�y `�7 ! ` __ �
� ; j � � �
, � / . ��
�i11 �� � � � ; - `�,,A
�
�✓ I , ,
) /\` � I I_ _ i _ � _ I
9QrHSTflEEf50, f I ^
� � � ���.I � � �___��� - /-_/�
F// �: � f , ��� � l IAPEA4AV� 1
1.____
����� � - --"'�=�" � �.
V � 1 \
� d � ���, � 1 � �.�.
\
\�.
a � � 7 __� �_
� , �
� g ���� -- P� !�—�1 ��!�°_
N �- I _ . --.- �—___-- i . , �. ; I �
' 915iSfpEETjO. � � . �
� F __� � -_ _ , ��i
\ � _� '_�_ _ _ _
f 1 n m _._.....__.. ,, �,
I � �'� —� � �
g I !I__� n I�I�� � 1 ��
\ � � ��
o � — � � �
� ......_l'� � � \\
� �
_ � `�
� I I V `I 4— � \ �
o n '
6 � �I
� �.. ��
,� a � ' r ;;�� �l
� —� � � � � � ' –
, �
„ �
_....._ N , ,
� 1 � � �
�� 1�� ARR 0.��
. �—.. . __ ��
�
PAVEMENT DISTRICT F1
� ���� � I �
� \ \ L I V' IN q� /��
�� i� � so / \� n,
lr � � \�, yd � �
��� ���,
--�-;� ��� '; ��,�%�
�, /„
�
,.
��
i \
�E�
�`�'
,��-
�' ,
/, �\7�
� \
/ ',\<
/�' �
�r
; - . ; � �, w,��-� \ I /
^ .
�,
�� �';�. '' ��'—�
L. �
: � o /—
'; w ? �
,;,., _.._.__........ .I Q '� � \ �.�EI
��- -FN- �_ ,%>
-�_�_�.
❑
���1 AI� BOLTON M A ING_
Consulfing Engineers & Surveyor
b �KqMNFnm9
0
90TH SfREEf 50.
LEGEND:
XX: PAVEMENT CONDITION RATING
__—. 5�
55
_.___� 60
65
� � � PAVEMENT DISTRILT
COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEM ENT PROJECT
�
oiy or
� Cortage Grove °�°
Horizantal Scale In Feet
Minnesora
�� ��L�!�
�� �
,
H � ��
! � ;�.
iJ ' . ,
;
Ir` j� �� //,
m_�� ��%%
�7 ,
�I��1111� � �
V.,111,11)
--�' i
o,
� �`' ;
� ��/
� F/
/
�� �� �/ \\�)
, � , � /
% , `��,
�
�����
\ s
'� o
�� � i / � y / ���-_
, �� .. �
�� �..
, � � ,����
.
�i ��� ,
���_ ;
� ....................
✓' �� ����������I
� [ I
__ � ;
;
_.�
, �
.._ ___ _ _�_�
9DTH SfREET 50.
............. ........
�_-.-....-I ,....._ � ^
I
I �^ l�
0 0\,� — I w'��I
,� a ��
,,,
�
- � ��� �
�/ �..,�
� � ��
--� '�
. \
_. _ -_��r
�,11�
� �``
l
PAVEMENT DISTRICT F1
�, ____ _________ ,�,,,,,
,� � � �_� �-_
-� _ �
/OI11 BOLTO MEN A INC
Consul}ing Engineers & Surveyors
0
FLSi:�T:fYa
LEGEND:
� PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT
FUTURE TRAIL
� � � PAVEMENT DISTRICT
COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROJECr
�
4
Cily of
Coitage Grove °m
Horizontal Scale In Fee[
Minnesold
' � ��u��
� � ��. i✓
�� � �
�� / ��' �� � r /
,�, .� ,. , -i_
,
<_ ,
y � —
'/....�� -
.._. ,�
� �
�
i
�
�
� /� \ \
�,
/ �
7 �' �.
a 200 400
Horizontal�
Bp�
• LEGEND
� REPLACE VALVE BOXAND BOLTS
I � STORMSEWER:
PATCH STRURURE (WALL, INVERT, OR DOGHOUSE)
i _ STORMSEWER:
ADD 1-FT BARREL SECfION
i o SANITARVSEWER:
ADD 1-Ff BARREL SEC�ION
� SANITARVSEWER:
I PATCH STRURURE (WALL, INVERT, OR DOGHOUSE)
� SANITARYSEWER:
i 4' CIPP REPAIR
- SANITARYSEWER:
REMOVE & REPLACE 50' SE6MENT
I � SANITARYSEWER:
i CHEMICAlROOTTREATMENT
� STORMSEWER:
4' CIPP REPAIR
I
I
I
�
I
I
`;�,'��_��,,,���� - � �
�
„ � �� _
_ .
w
� w a c �
� W
, 1 .,.._.._ ,
�;.,- = , - - -- ----- --- --- --_ ----- - __
-�.—��—u <-------
—�---- . -_��--' -----�_____ __u_�.�-Y - ---�
��
, �� �.�
-�---- .�. - �! — —
��---- -- - ---__=_`--------------- --
�,, o,. y
.,
- �-
. . . �
, ,,......._;
,
IU , '' '
,
- =-
_ _. -�--�. i
BOLTON 8c MENK� INC.
Consulfing Englneers r< surv�yo�s COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEM ENT PROJECT
s+ut mrv
aascaM�+ xewnixeo�mHarna,in 11TIIINIMPRnVFMFNTS Fir.iioGc
� a� Y or
Cottage Grove
Minnesoia
Cilyof A�� BOLTON 8c MENK� INC_
o zoo naa /III co�swnoy e�9i�ee�s & s�r�eyo.: COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA
Cottage Grove � W 2014PAVEMENTMANAGEMENTPROIEQ
Minnesaa ��,�`��tais`ai`mfee` b cx�sxA,mHaaMSn,mumnPiEVmoo,mHewnmeAO,MHama,in
ASSESSABLE PARCELS
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Appendix C
Cost Estimate Summary
Cottage
J Grove
� Pride anaQ�O$Perity Meet
�
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project
Inclutlez 10%COntingency a 30% Intli�ec[ Cos[s
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Appendix D
Preiiminary Assessment Roll
Cottage
J Grove
� Pride anaerOSPerity Meet
���. _, �`•, ;W; '
� �r' '"
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project
Preliminary Assessment Roll
District F3 Pavement Reqlacement
21027211
21027211
2102721
2102721
2102721110033
21027211
2102721
2102721110069
2102721110073
ZERR MICHAEI P & BONNYJ
iURNER PATRICIA A
PETERSEN NINA M& SHEENA M MONSRUD
FUCHS TERRY 1& DANA J
NORDMAN ALAN H& JUDITH L
DERRY WILLIAM L �
W EST JASON T& 1ACOBS J EN N I FER
WESSINGER WILLIAM A & MARILYN
LANE GABRIEL D
GUSTAFSSON JOHN A& LERIN M MEfZKE
ELTHON JUSTIN & CRYSTAI
GEYEN MARC & LINDSEY
GUYIEFFREY A & SANDRA D
BUCHHOLZ DANIELI
HEMMESCN DEBRA G& TROY E
KORF MICHAELJ & EIIZABETH A
WHEELOCKJEFFREYS & DENISE L
KLEIN JAMES R& KARYN L
SOBY TIMOTHY M& LAWANNA C
ANDERSON THOMASI & LAURA M
LINDEMAN PHILIP G& PATRICIA A LINDEMAN
LINDSTROM KRIS R& CAROLYN M
VANOVERBEKE JEFFREY E& CHRISTINA M VANOVERBEKE
BERGDAL�JOHN E & ELIZABETH
HORNES 1AME5 D& REBECCA L SCHMIDTKE
HOFFROGGE DAVID PJ & TRACY L
SECRETARY OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT
WAGNER PHILIPAMOS & LINDA M
ELLISON RAYMOND E& KAREN S
TAPE JERRY W& CINDY 5
COOPER CRAIG D& NREKA L
RENARD RANDY & PAMEIA
BIRKELANDIEREMYC
ROSE JENNIFER K& JEFFREY A
KIBWANA THOMAS & YOLANDA
PEREZ DAVID & HORACIO PEREZ
ARMBRUSTER105EPH B & REBECCA
MARSHALL DONALD 1& ALICE L
MALLATTROY F & DIANA M
AKAKPO YAO
PINAULT ASHLEY N
THORNTON ROBERT M 1R & DIANE D
MEIERIOHN D &IENNIFER L
GEBHARDT KELLY G& LAURIE A
OTTE JOSEPH & CHRISTINE
MARK EZEKIEL
KI M BALL SCOTT D& JOAN M
STRUVEJEFFREYA & KATHLEEN M
ASHENAFI GETAHUM H& SENAIT K BEDAS50
SMITH DIANA L
SCHABACKER JEFFREY 5& LYNN A
SIREK SHAUN R& AIMEE R WARNER
NYQUIST GARY R & SHERYLI
MILLER RALPH LJR & LINDA L
SHERMAN MICHAEL F& SUSAN M
WATTERS 1ENNIFER M& JOSHUA R
WELLS WILLIAM L& ROXANN �
KUNZ ROBERTJ & RITA K
JUNGWIRTH BRENDAA
RELOCATION PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT LLC
RPM INV GROUP
HAMMARSTEN MARK A & CHRISTINE
BRUMM TODD G& LISA A
YOUNGqUIST GREGORY M& KARA L
LEWIS SCOTT M & NANCYJEAN
WENDEITHOMAS A & KAUP TRACY
MAURER WILLIAM E &IENNIFER 5
BERGER CHANCE L
NGEH EVA K
KOSKI DANIEL W & PAMELAJ
KREMMIN CHRISTINE ANN
KOGER ADAM J& ERIN M
KLIMMEK105EPH M& SAMUEL K KLIMMEK
BRIGGS SCOTT N& ANGELA M
�
�
m
m
m
m
�
�
m
m
m
m
m
�
m
�
�
�
�
�
m
m
�
m
m
�
�
�
�
�
�
m
9000 JANIE AVE
9016 JANIE AVE
9032 JANIE AVE 5
9048 JANIE AVE 5
9064JANIE AVE
9080 JAN I E AVE
9096 JANIE AVE
9112 JANIE AVE
9128 JANIE AVE
9144 JANIE AVE
8938 91ST ST 5
8924 915T ST
8910 915T ST 5
8900 915T ST
8886 915T 5T 5
8880 915T ST S
8874 915T ST
8868 915T ST
8862 915T ST 5
8856 915T ST 5
8850 915T ST 5
8844 915T ST
8838 915T ST 5
8832 915T ST 5
8826 915T ST 5
8820 915T ST
8814 91ST ST
8808 91ST ST
8802 915T Si
8803 915T ST 5
SS17 915T ST 5
883191ST ST 5
8545 915T ST
8859 915T ST
8873 91ST ST
8887 915T ST 5
8901915T ST
8915 915T ST 5
8929 915T ST 5
8943 915T ST
8957 91ST ST S
8971915T Si
8985 915T Si
8999 915T ST
9178 JANERO AVE 5
9162JANERO AVE
9146JANERO AVE
9130 JANERO AVE S
9114JANERO AVE
9098JANERO AVE
9082 JANERO AVE S
9066JANERO AVE
9050JANERO AVES
9034JANERO AVE
9018JANERO AVE
9002 JANERO AVE S
9001 JANIE AVE S
9017 JAN I E AV E
9033 JANIE AVE S
9049 JANIE AVE 5
9065 JANIE AVE 5
9081 JANIE AVE
9097 JANIE AVE
9113JANIEAVE
9129JANIEAVE
9145 JANIE AVE
9161 JANIE AVE
9177 JANIE AVE
9179 JANERO AVE S
9163JANERO AVE
9147JANERO AVE
9131JANERO AVES
9115JANERO AVES
9099JANERO AVES
$3,03
$3,03
�
C
C
C
C
`
G
C
C
C
�
C
�
Preliminary Assessment Roli
District FS Pavement Replacement
2202721210013
220272
2202721210063
2202721210067
2202721210069
2202721210071
�
�
�
�
�
�
m
m
�
�
�
m
�
�
m
m
�
m
m
m
m
m
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
m
m
m
m
m
HOFEN PHILLIP C& DEBORAH M PRAN
THOMAS D & BARBARA 1
v1AN5 MARK F& DEEANN M DENNING
IWER SCOTT K& PEGGY 5
SILVERGLATETRINA M
HASAN MIR1A M& KAOSAR S
LAFORGEJOANN M
PEPER MARY L
VOLKKARENL
SORENSON ROGER W& SUSAN R
NIENOW IOSHUA & TANYA
DAVIS AARON
KEEN RENEE C
lONES DONALD R
BROWN CHRISTOPHER M& SUSANNAH K
MYCKELBY WESLEY L& PARIS A
OROPEZAJESSE M
SPENCER CRAIG E& DARLENE L
IOHNSON STEVEN A& BARBARA A
MANSHI P JAMES L& BEVERLY A
TOTH LAURA M& BRIAN 5 �
IONES DAVID C& LAURIE LYNN
NEUMANN ERIK E& DEBRA L
ABBASTROY M
GROVUM DAVIDI & KATHERINE A
HAGENS KAYLA A
DAVIS KYLE LIN
STRAFELDA GARY D& RITA M
ALLMAN GARY W& PATRICIA A
JANECEK JAMES E
RIDDLE DANIELJ &JENA M BECHEL
SCHLEH JEFFREYI & LAURA L
ENGLUND IONATHAN E& JESSICA K
ANDERSON JULIE K
THENE DANIEL 5
HOGSTAD HISAKO K
COLLINS MICHAELJ & ANNETTE L
ANDERSON TIMOTHY G& IEAN E
SPICER SfEVEN M& CHERYL A
MARTIN 1A50N ) & MICHELLE AM
BRANNAN DEBORAH A PORATH & CHAD M WILHELM
BLACK DAVID M& KRISTINE C
UY JAMES
ANDERSON DALE C& ROSEMARY E
KATH RONAID M& KATHRYN 1
MIKE RYGH HOMES INC
SMITH BRIAN R& SARAH E
POKELA KEITH A& DARLA K
WIETGREFE WESLEY N &IEANNE
LEVAKE MICHAEL W & MARGARET
HARPER CYNTHIAJEAN MOODY
DONLIN JAMESI & VICKI L
NOLTE PAUL1 & MARCY A BOVALD
MAGEE ANDRAEA
SCHNEIDER DAVID & LINDA L PATTEN
SPEIRS BRUCE 1& MICHELLE A
KOREN MARK A& ANNEffE M
BURCIAGA JOSE A & GLORIA
MILLER ELISA M �
OLSON ANDREW M& TARA J HUXFORD
STROM BRAD L& IULIE M
BLOMGREN VICKIE L& DANIEL M
KRINGS 1EAN M & DANIELJ
IUSTICE DEREK H �
MUSKOPF CLINTON R& DEBORAH K
VANG LA MEE & KONG PHENG & PAKOU VANG
HEROfFJOHN C &JANELD
OOMS ROGER R& KIM I
OTTIACKIE D& KATHLEEN M
THAO MAI M& TIA YANG
HOLMES GARY G& JUDITH A
DOUBLIN ROBERT N& KRISTI H
9067JANERO AVE
9051JANERO AVE
9035JANERO AVE
9019JANERO AVE
9003JANERO AVE
9013 91ST Si
9027 915T Sf
9047JASMINEAVES
9053 JASMINE AVE 5
9067JASMINEAVES
90771ASMINE AVE S
9048JEFFERY AVES
9030 JEFFERY AVE 5
'��9022 JEPPERY AVE S
�9010JEFFERY AVES
9002JEFFERY AVES
9001JEfFERY AVE 5
9011JEFFERY AVES
9025JEFFERY AVES
9029 JEFFERY AVE 5
9033 JEFFERY AVE 5
9041JEFFERY AVE S
9055 JEFFERY AVE 5
9069JEFFERY AVES
9198 91ST ST 5
9098JEFFERY AVE
90881EFFERY AVE
9078JEFFERY AVE
9068 JEFFERY AVE S
9058 JEFFERY AVE S
9209 915T ST 5
9139JEFFERY AVE
9135JEFFERY AVES
9131JEFFERY AVE
91271EFFERY AVE
9123JEFFERY AVE
9119 JEFFERY AVE S
9115JEfFERY AVE S
9098JENSEN AVES
9094JENSEN AVES
9086JENSEN AVES
9072JENSEN AVES
90621ENSEN AVE S
9052JENSEN AVES
9046JENSEN AVES
9038JENSEN AVES
9024JENSEN AVE
9014JENSEN AVES
9008JENSEN AVES
9004JENSEN AVE 5
9087 JENSEN AVE 5
9079JENSEN AVE
9075JENSEN AVE
9071JENSEN AVE
9063JENSEN AVES
9057JENSEN AVES
9051 JENSEN AVE S
9049JENSEN AVES
9039JENSEN AVES
9027JENSEN AVE
9017JENSEN AVES
9009 JENSEN AVE 5
9005 JENSEN AVE 5
90061ERGEN AVES
9012JERGEN AVES
9016JERGEN-AVES
9026JERGEN AVES
9032JERGEN AVES
9040JERGEN AVES
9044JERGEN AVES
9054JERGEN AVES
3060JERGEN AVES
30701ERGEN AVE 5
$3,03
$3,03
Preliminary Assessment Roll
District Fl Pavement Replacement
2202721210080 � F1 ROHR KELSEYI & SHERRIE L
2202721210081 F1 SCHMITf1AY H __
2202721210082 Fl KVAM JAMES D
2202721210083 F1 ROHR MARK P
2202721210084 fl TOBRITZHOFER PAMELAI & ROBERT
2202721210085 Fl FINKTHOMASA&CHERYLA
2202721210086 FS RASMUSSEN KURT K& COLLEEN M
2202721210087 F1 ANDERSON MARK W& LORIA
2202721210088 F1 MCQUEEN REBECCAIC
2202721210089 Fl NEILSONMARKA&JOYM
2202721210090 Fl KNUDTSON DONALD G& NANCY A
2202721210091 F1 FEDERALNATIONALMORT6AGEASSOCIATION
2202721210092 F1 KARELSIEFFREY R& SHERRY K
2202721210093 F1 KUHNSTHOMAS B& AMY K
2202721210094 Fl MANNING THOMAS ROBERT & FAY
2202721210095 F1 BREZINKA ZACHARY A
2202721210096 Fl EDWARDS BRYAN D& ELLEN L
22027212101
22027212101
22027212
22027212
2202721220010
2202721220011
2202721220012
2202721220013
2202721220015
m
m
�
�
�
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
m
m
�
�
�
m
m
�
�
�
�
�
�
JLIVIER LLEWELLYN
BADGER ROBERT D
COLON JOSE A & MARIBEL
VIAENE KEVIN E& VICKIE L
BCC HOLDMGS LLC
DAWSEY RANDALL A& DAWN M
TUTHILLJULIE L
HOOPMAN JUSTIN R
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGA6E CORP
OLWELL MICHELE M
IORGEN50N JENNIFER L
SCHROEDER CYNTHIA B
VANWIJK CARL L& ELIZE M
LAWRENCETODDI &JENNIFER M
FRANCIS NICOLAS & SHERYL RICHIE
OLDHAM SHAWN & HEIDI B
NELSON MICHAELB & KIMBERLYJ
WOLTIER EDWARD D& MARGARET K
RAMMER PAUL K& JODI L
TORRENS BENJAMIN W& HOLLY R
KVAMME MICHAELS & BRENDA L
HAAG JEREMY M
KOOSMAN N J ESSICA D& PH I LLI P
BAKER KARRI L& THOMAS J SCHWINGLE SR
MANGUARDIA GRE AM & LILIBETH P MAN6UARDIA
BECKER JASON D& MARISA l
WESTPHAL RALPH G
WITTENBERG KIMBERLY A
BAYUNUS OWAIS & KISHWAR
LINDAHL DUANE A& 11LL M
BEARD TRAVIS N& JOAN M
GENETIOHN A III & KRISTEN 5
CRAIG EDWARD P 1R & ANGEIA M
ANDRES FRANKJ & DEBRA A
SWEDZINSKI PATRICKI &JENNIFER L
SULLIVAN DWIGHTT& MICHELLE LROBERTS
DAWN HOWARDI JR & DE'ANNE M
HELMERICK ARTHUR 1 & MARY1
LACROIXIEREMY 5 & KIMBERLY R
BUETTNER PHILLIP 1& JOY AJ
WINKLER DENNIS W& SANDRA D
LARSON LEDEAN R &JUDITH
MULGREW DOUGLAS & SPEEDLING A& ANN-MARIE
PADILLA MARVIN
SOLEM JOSEPH D& KATHLEEN MW
PETfEY ERIC l& CARRIE L
SORENSON DANASOREN &YARIlZY50RENSON
LEVINGS HOMER & ELIZABETH
SWANSON COREY J& TRACY A
XIONG YEE R& XAO L
MURPHY PATRICK D& KIMBERLEY L
SCOTf CHARLES P& BRENDA K
HAYDENJOHNE& DEBORAHI
HARTMANN LAURY K
STRAU55 MARTIN J& KAY M
LEFEBVRE MATTHEW J& DEANNA D
3080 JERGEN AVE 5
3084JERGEN AVE S
3096 JER6EN AVE S
3111 JER6EN AVE S
3083JERGEN AVES
3081JERGEN AVE
3073JERGEN AVES
3065JERGEN AVE
3061JERGEN AVES
3059JERGEN AVES
3053JERGEN AVES
3043 JERGEN AVE S
3035JERGEN AVE
3031JERGEN AVES
3019JERGEN AVES
3007JERGEN AVES
3003JERGEN AVES
3159JEFFERY AVES
3151JEFFERY AVES
3143 JEFFERY AVE S
3103 JEFFERY AVE S
3111JEFFERY AVES
3099JENSEN AVE
3095JENSEN AVE
3498 92ND ST S
347692ND STS
3464 92ND ST 5
3197JERGEN AVES
3189JERGEN AVES
3104JERGEN AVES
9110JERGEN BAY 5
9116JERGEN BAY 5
3122JERGEN BAY S
9128JERGEN BAY S
9134JERGEN BAY S
9176JERGEN BAY 5
91S2JER6EN BAY S
9188JERGEN BAY S
9194JERGEN AVE
9200 JERGEN AVE 5
9499 92ND ST 5
9487 92ND STS
9455 92ND STS
9005JAREAU AVE
9013JAREAU AVE
9021JAREAU AVE
9029JAREAU AVE
9037JAREAU AVE
9045 JAREAU AVE
9053 JAREAU AVE
9061JAREAU AVE
9069JAREAU AVE
9077 JAREAU AVE S
9085 JAREAU AVE S
9093 JAREAU AVE 5
9100 915T ST 5
9106 915T ST
9112 915T ST 5
911891STSTS
9113JARVISAVE
9129 JARVIS AVE
9145 JARVIS AVE
91611ARVI5 AVE
9ll7 JARV15 AVE S
9193 JARVIS AVE
9126 92ND ST
9132 92ND ST
913892ND STS
9178JARVISAVE
9164 JARVIS AVE
9150 JARVIS AVE
9136 JARVIS AVE S
$3,031.66
$3,031.66 $3,03
$3,031.66 $3,03
$3,031.66 $3,03
$3,031.66 $3,03
$3,031.66 53,03
$3,031.66 $3,03
$3,031.66 53,03
$3,031.66 $3,03
$3,031.66 $3,03
$3,031.66 $3,03
$3,031.66 $3,03
$3,031.66 $3,03
Preliminary Assessment Roll
District F3 Pavement Realacement
2202721220053
2202721220055
GREGORYJ & DIANE
JODRIDGE LLC
US JOHN A& MARY K
:KURTF&1ANETF
BRUCHEZ WENDY J
BATTAIION PETER P
KUE XANG 1& MAY VANG
LINDELL GERAID
HOLLERUNG GINA R & BARBARAJ
UHLENDORP MICHAEU & AMY1
O'BRIEN TIMOTHYT & LYNNE M
DUFOUR RICHARD H& MARY 1
F1 CRUZFRANKLG
F1 KORF MITCHELL D& BARBARA A
FS MUFFATJEFFRYC&JULIE2
Fl VANHOVENPETERC&JU�IAA
Fl MEYER HAROLD W& DENISE A
FS LOMANIERRYM&IENNIFERJ
Fl PATTEN LINDA __
Fl JONES CONNIE l
Fl WOLTERINGDAVIDJ&JILLM
FS SCHLICHTE GLEN A
F1 NITZPETERI&SHEILAA
FI SMITH STEVEN NOBLE & JUDITH l
Fl L„"...EY....,.._,._�L�_..__._._..._
OON DANIE & BRIDGITf N
Fl BISHMAN COREY M& MELISSA A
Fl PATRICK M LYNCH REV TRS
FS JUDKINSJOHN D& PAMELA A
Fl SCHUMI MICHAELT& RUTH L
F1 HOVDE FRANK C& MARY ANN
F1 HODGE ANTHONY A& SHAWNA R
Fl LANZIAMES W & KELIYJ
Fl RECHTZIGEL BETHANY A
Fl DAVISSHANER&JENNIFERJ
F1 HUEBSCH DEREK & AlISA
F1 ROBERTSON ANGELA M
FS VERDICK JAMES S& HEATHER M
Fl WIETECKI STEPHEN A& LORI A
Fl STREHLO CORISSA L �
F1 HUESMANN MICHAEL&STOEHRIOKA &IOKAYSTOEHR
Fl DELEON STEVEN & DIANA
Fl DOCHNIAK CHRISTOPHER & DIANA
Fl SISNEROS MICHAEL P& ANESSA D
Fl LANIK STEVEN 1
Fl BIENIEKIACKT&GEORGANNEM
F1 UEYONAHARALAURA
Fi SECRETARY OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Fl BRAND ASHLEY K
Fl NICKLAYJOHN ROBERT & JUDITH
Fl FRETSCHEL SARAH E& JOHN R HANSON III
FS BAN2 KEVIN R& MARI C
F3 MURRAY SR TIMOTHY P& DIONE M
Fl MCGOWAN PETER JOSEPH & LEA ANNA SAMS MCGOWA
2202721220093 F1
2202721220094 F1
2202721220095 F1
2202721220096 F1
2202721220D97 F1
2202721220098 F1
2202721220099 F1
2202721230002 F1
2202721230003 FS
2202721230004 F1
2202721230005 F1
2202721230006 F1
2202721230007 F1
2202721230008 F1
2202721230009 fl
2202721230010 F1
2202721230011 FS
2202721240016 F1
5T DAVID E& CRISfINA M
SEN PHILLIP R& LORI A�
)WIN BRIAN R & DAWN M
RT JOHN 11R & KIM M
90RROW JENNY & MATTHEW
DRICKSON CURTIS
�EEN GREG A & SUSAN 1
45H DANIEU & KAREN M
;GAN CARRIE F
i C08Y 1& LYNN M
\NK VIRGINIA & WILLIAM
BRUCE A & KIMBERLEE A
OHUE ROBERTJ & ESTELLA M
ZGERJOSEPH M & PATRICIA
TIMOTHYI
tENKLER DORIS M
ERSON THOMAS W& SHIRLEY D
9122 JARVIS AVE
9108 JARVIS AVE S
91151AREAU AVES
9125JAREAU AVES
9004 JAREAU AVE 5
9018 JAREAU AVE S
9032 JAREAU AVE S
9046 JAREAU AVE 5
9060JAREAU AVES
90741AREAU AVES
9088JAREAU AVES
9100JAREAU AVE
9110 JAREAU AVE S
9120 JAREAU AVE N
9002 JASMI N E CT S
9004JASMINECTS
9006JASMINECTS
9008 JASMI N E CT 5
9010 JASMINE Cf 5
9012 JASMINE CT S
9014 JASMI NE CT S
90161ASMINE CT S
9018 JASMINE CT S
9020JASMINEAVES
9078JASMINEAVES
9088JASMINEAVES
9190 915T ST S
9166915TST5
9144 91ST Si 5
913091ST5T5
9124 915T ST 5
9003JASMINEAVES
9011JASMINEAVES
9019 JASMINE AVE 5
9031 JASMINE AVE 5
9085 JASMINE AVE 5
9091 JASMINE AVE S
9125 915T 5T 5
9137 91ST 5T 5
915191ST 5T 5
9108JASMINEAVES
9140 JASMINE AVE 5
9152JASMINEAVES
9166JASMINEAVES
9174 JASMINE AVE 5
91881ASMINE AVES
9187 JASMINE AVE S
9ll9 JASMINE AVE S
9161JASMINEAVES
9155JASMINEAVES
9141JASMINEAVES
9123JASMINEAVES
9103JASMINEAVES
9199 91ST ST
9118 JEFFERY AVE
9136 JEFFERY AVE 5
9154 JEFFERY AVE
9ll21EFFERY AVE
9166 92ND ST
9156 92ND ST 5
9150 92ND ST S
9144 92ND ST
9137 92ND 5T
913192ND ST
9125 92ND ST 5
9115 92ND ST 5
9105 92N D ST
9198 JARVIS AVE
9143 92ND ST
9149 92ND ST
9155 92ND ST
9165 92ND ST
9314JEFFERY AVE
@
$3,03
�
C
C
L
�
$3,03
$3,03
$3,03
Preliminary Assessment Roll
District F1 Pavement Replacement
2202721240017
2202721240029
2202721240033
2202721240043
220272
2202721240122
2202721240123
CRAPPSJAYLEE
REIFFENBERGER MEGAN M
ROSS SCOTT P& CLAIRE 1
POMEROY ROBERT SCOTT & PAULA
DARST ANDREW T& TARA B
MCDONALD SCOTT & PATRICIA
RYAN CATHERINE M
KIMMEN JESSICA & BRYAN WITSCHEN
SUTLIFF MICHAEL V & VALERIE
PALO RALPH E& BEVERLY J
AHLMAN MICHAELA & KIMBERLY 5 HOEPNER
LATTERELI DONALD & KELLEY B
TESCHLER DERE & KARIN MATHIESEN
ETTEN MICHAELD &TONI E
KARNES KEVIN R & 11LL
IMESON ROBERT
GRAFF THOMAS 1& DENISE M
KASA HEATHER & ERIC M
OLDRE LISA A& KIRK G
HELLER KYLE & BRIITANY
CHEA HENG & EAP DAVAN
BALLMAN BERNARD JR & BERNELDA
JOHNSON SUSAN M
SCHOENHEIDER KEVIN D & SAN�Y
PANEK GEORGE C& SANDRA 5
THORPE KARRIE ETAL
HEIN DELNO & DOROTHY
PIERRE DAVID E& PATRICIA R
NIEMALA ROBERT& DEBORAH
HALIBURTON RICHARD T& RENEE D
DACK SCOTi T& AU DREY A
SUSAG JOHN R& LISA A
VOGT DALE F& CATHY A
WOOD KATIE L& LUKE P ALBERS
MARTIN JEFFREY S& KELLEY A
NEUMAN PAUL1 &JODI L
RUCKERTHOMASJ & LINDA L
BACKBERG BLAINE R& MIA 1
ABRAHAM THOMAS & BARBARA A L
LUKITSCH DANIEL C& LISA L
ELTON RODNEY N& ROBIN D
STOLTZ WILLIAM I& CERISSA A
VOGEL LEWIS M& KAYLEEN A
LEVANG RICHARD C& KRISTIN M
CHALICH MICHAELJ &PEGGYI
GALLOWAY NICK
CHERVENY-REINKE BRENDAI
THORNELLIOSEPH E JR & LYNSEY R
SWITZER KIRK W& LISA M
LEE HSU YI
MCDANIELTIMM 1 & KELLY
CROOKS MARK W& SUSAN R
MOONE RONALD & RICHARD & RHODA MOONE
LARSON CHRISTOPHER &JENNIFER
ROBERT MARK MANAGEMENT GROUP
WELLS FARGO BANK
B10RNBERG GLEN A& MARY 8
HOFFMAN CARISSA A& KATHRYN SLOAN
VORDERBRUGGEN DAVID E & ANDREA
SMITH SCOTT A
RUSSELLEDWARD PHILLIP &KIMDUN & KIMDUNG RUSSELL
BILOTI'A CHAD
DUKIC MILAN & JEANNIE K
STOCKTON JR JAMES R& KATHLEEN
KOSLOSKILAURA
THOMPSON MARK A& DEBRA L
�
�
�
�
m
m
�
m
m
m
�
�
�
�
�
m
m
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
m
D2 JEFFERY AVE
19 93 RD ST S
25 93RD ST
43 93RD ST
79 93RD ST
95 93RD 5T
35 JEFFERY AVE
47 JEFFERY AVE
79 JEFFERY AVE
93 JEFFERY AVE
21 JEFFERY AVE
23 JEFFERY Cf
25 JEFFERY CT
27 JEFFERY Ci
29 JEFFERY CT
31JEFFERY CT
33 JEFFERY CT
35JEFFERY CT
37JEFFERY CT
39JEFFERY CT
41JEFFERY CT
34 93 RD ST
36 93 RD S
8 8 93 R D S
`J2 93RD ST
40JERGEN BAY 5
46JERGEN BAY 5
521ERGEN BAY 5
58JERGEN BAY 5
64JERGEN BAY 5
70JERGEN BAY 5
12JERGEN Ci5
1SJERGEN CTS
24JERGEN Ci5
30JERGEN Ci5
36JERGEN Ci5
42JERGEN Ci5
4SJERGEN CTS
54JERGEN CT
60JERGEN CTS
66JERGEN CTS
72JERGEN Ci5
78 JERGEN AVE
79 JERGEN AVE
81 JERGEN AVE S
84 JER6EN AVE S
90 JERGEN AVE S
96 JERGEN AVE S
44 93RD ST S
24 93RD ST 5
15 93RD ST 5
33 93RD ST 5
85 JERGEN AVE 5
89JERGEN AVES
95 JERGEN AVE S
27 tEFFERY AVE 5
23 JEFFERY AVE
19 JEFFERY AVE 5
15 JEFFERY AVE S
13 JEFFERY AVE S
11 JEFFERY AVE 5
09 JEFFERY AVE 5
07 JEFFERY AVE 5
03 JEFFERY AVE 5
79 JEFFERY AVE 5
�
C
C
C
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
Preliminary Assessment Roll
District F4 Pavement Replacement
ParcellD District Owner Address Units $/Unit Total/Unit
2202721220036 F4 MERGENS VINCENT R& DIANE M 91351AREAU AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220037 F4 MORROW SHANNON 9145 JAREAU AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220038 F4 BACON BRADLEY T& KIMBERLY A 9155 JAREAU AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220049 F4 SENGER LAURENE R 9140 JAREAU AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220050 F4 OLSON DEBRA E& JANET L 91501AREAU AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220101 F4 JOLLY KURIAKOSE & MARIAMMA 9175 JAREAU AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220102 F4 PEDERSON LORI & LAVALLE JEROME 9156 JAREAU AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220103 F4 COMO CHERYL A 9168 JAREAU AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220104 F4 JENNINGS RONALD R& PATRICIA A 9170 JAREAU AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220105 F4 THOR YENG & XIONG VANG 9182 JAREAU AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220106 F4 EBERT THOMAS 1& MARY G 9167 JAREAU AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230012 F4 STANDFIELDIEANETTEB 9204JEFFERYBAY 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230013 F4 CONSTABLE RICHARD C JR & DARLA D SENN 9206 JEFFERY BAY 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230014 F4 LEMAY PAUL W& VALERIE E 9210JEfFERY BAY 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230015 F4 BANASZEWSKI RICHARD T& ANGELA M SLAVIK 9218 JEFFERY BAY 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230016 F4 BOE DONALD T& LINDAJ 9222 JEFFERY BAY 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230017 F4 JOHNSON NICOLE L 9226JEFFERY BAY S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230018 F4 WILSON JOHN R& MICHELLE M 9230JEFFERY BAY 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230019 F4 CEKALLADONALDI&JULIEA 9258JEFFERYAVES 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230020 F4 RAYMOND KENT A& NICOLE M 9296 93RD ST 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230021 F4 GEAR ALAN W& KATY L 9274 93RD ST 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230022 F4 ROERING DANIEL P 9258 93RD ST 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230023 F4 STEINMETZERIK 928793RDSTS 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721Z30024 F4 KU JOSHUA W& LEE XIONG 9265 93RD ST 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
220Z721230025 F4 SCHULTZ NOEL P& KIM M 9374 JASMINE AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230026 F4 HOFFMAN STEVEN J& KIMBERLY A 9396 JASMINE AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230027 F4 HALVORSONSUSAN 9412JASMINEAVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230028 F4 ROBERTSSHIRLEYM 9438JASMINEAVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230029 F4 JARVIS ERBAYNE W& DEBORAH 5 9454JASMINEAVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230030 F4 SEVERSON JOSEPH & ALICIA SEVERSON 9470 JASMINE AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230031 F4 HAMILTON EFREM M& TRACIE M 9484JASMINE AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230032 F4 WENNER THOMAS E& KAREN A 9361 JASMINE AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230033 F4 VENTRELLA DAVID A& WHITNEY- & CLAUDETTE WHITNEY-V 9373 JASMINE AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230034 F4 PETERSON RON R& 6AIL CORSON 93851ASMINE AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230035 F4 LEE DAVID E& MARTHA I 9407 JASMINE AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230036 F4 NASBYKEITHA 9429JASMINEAVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230037 F4 SAUERERPATRICKJ&KATHRYN 9443JASMINEAVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230038 F4 KAMNIKAR BRIAN D& KAREN D 9465 JASMINE AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230039 F4 STACHOWIAK ROBERT & KATHLENE L BROWN 9499 JASMINE AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230042 F4 MCCONNELLJAMES & SHIREEN 9183 JAREAU AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230043 F4 TALLARICO SEAN P 9191 JAREAU AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230044 F4 MALLINGERJOSHUAJ 9209JAREAUAVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230049 F4 VEESENMEYER ANTHONY J& NICOLE A MILLS 9194 JAREAU AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230050 F4 PETERSON LEON M& LISA M 9206 JAREAU AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230051 F4 VROMAN RYAN D& FAYE M 9228 JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230052 F4 RUUD CYNTHIA 9240 JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230053 F4 ZINS SCOTT W& JEAN K GARDNER ZINS 9262 JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230054 F4 BERGE JASON & LAURIE 9284 JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230055 F4 POMMERENING VINCENTJ & MARY C 9306 JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230056 F4 TOPP BRYAN J& CHENILLEJ 9328 JARROD AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230057 F4 SCHAFF KEITH A 9340 JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230058 F4 NEUMANN SCOTT G& SUSAN C 9362 JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230059 . F4 KHAN SHAHRUKH 93841ARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230060 F4 MCKEAGUE KARLT 9406 JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230061 F4 NELSON KENNETH B& KARRI C 9428 JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230062 F4 BAKERPAULA 9460JARRODAVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230063 F4 MURRAY TIMOTHY P JR & LISA K MURRAY 9482 JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230064 F4 ARCHAMBEAU DONALD A 9Z55 JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230065 F4 ECKES CORY L& PAULINE M 9273 JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230066 F4 CHESLOG BRIAN D& DANIEILE D 9291 JARROD AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230067 F4 MEIER JAMES 8& MARY PAT 9319 JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
Preliminary Assessment Roll
District F4 Pavement Replacement
Parcel ID District Owner Address Units $/Unit Total /Unit
220Z721230068 F4 BENCK MANDY J 9337 JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230069 F4 KORNMANN ROBBY D 9355 JARROD AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230070 F4 �EYDE MARK A& KATHLEEN M 9373 JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230071 F4 GARCIA DAVID 9391JARROD AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230072 F4 KAUL JESSE A& REBECCA L BAHR 9419 JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
220Z721230073 F4 CLAUSEN MARY I 9437 JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
220Z721230074 F4 MYERS DENNIS JAMES & JO AN E 9455 JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230075 F4 VIEROW MARK & PATRICIA 9473 JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230076 F4 SAND WADE K& NATALIE K 9477 JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230077 F4 DACK SCOTT T& AUDREY A 9Z25 JAREAU AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230078 F4 SCHWARTZ CARL P& MICHELLE 1 9243 JAREAU AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230079 F4 MCDONALD CHARLES M& DEBORAH 9265 JAREAU AVE 5 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230080 F4 ELLIS JANET R 9287 JAREAU AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721Z30081 F4 WESTON RYAN J& MElISSA L 92891AREAU AVE 5 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230082 F4 VOGEI. CHAD 93011AREAU AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230083 F4 HOLMSTADT GALE & SANDERS & LEILANI K SANDERS 93231AREAU AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
22027Z1230084 F4 DUSH BRADLEY & THERESA 9335 JAREAU AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230085 F4 SCHRANKLERJAMES P& PAMEI.A 9357JAREAU AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230086 F4 JUNGWIRTH CYNTHIA L 93891AREAU AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230087 F4 COLEMAN RYAN J 94111AREAU AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230088 F4 SYVERSON JEREMY P& ANGELA J 9433 JAREAU AVE 5 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230089 F4 ANDERSON KENNETH L& KATHLEEN A ANDERSON 94551AREAU AVE 5 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230090 F4 MEDINA LISA R 9477 JAREAU AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230091 F4 VOLNER RICHARD R& JOAN A 9481 JAREAU AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230092 F4 WOLKERSTORFER RONALD R& LORI 9499 JAREAU AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230093 F4 SCHUETH LON D 9238 JAREAU AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230094 F4 RIEPE WAYNE W& NANCY A 9254 JAREAU AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230095 F4 JOHNSON MICHE�LE R 9276 JAREAU AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230096 F4 FRANKLIN LYNETTE G& MICHAEL 1 9310 JAREAU AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
220�721230097 F4 GLASS DENNIS M& ANGEL L 9342 JAREAU AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
220�721230098 F4 WACHTLER PAULJOSEPH & CARINA 9364JAREAU AVE 5 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230099 F4 WII.LOWS ANDREA A 9376 JAREAU AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230100 F4 PRALL MICHAEL T& HEATHER E 9398 JAREAU AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230101 F4 SPIESS CASEY & MOLLY 9400 JAREAU AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
Z202721230102 F4 NOLAND ELLEN M 9422 JAREAU AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721Z30103 F4 MORGEL MARK 9444 JAREAU AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230104 F4 OLSON BRADLEY D& MELISSA K 9466 JAREAU AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230105 F4 CHAVIE SHAWN J 9495 JARROD AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230106 F4 KATHLEEN A LUCKMANN TRS 9491JARROD AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230107 F4 BRUCE MICHAEL & NANCY CANDY 9489 JARROD AVE 5 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230108 F4 KALIS MATTHEW A& KELLY M 9485 JARROD AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230109 F4 BHAKTA KIRIT 9484 JARROD AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721Z30110 F4 MUEIINERJOEL & KRISTINE LEMIRE 9486 JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230111 F4 EDWARDS MICHAEL P JR 9488 JARROD AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230112 F4 KORBEL BRENT D& EMIIY L 9490 JARROD AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230113 F4 KLEINSCHMIDT KEVIN T& LISA M LANCRAIN 9492 JARROD AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230114 F4 ADEREMI-ATA TOYIN M& OLUWOLE A 9496 JARROD AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230115 F4 STADLER KEITH M& SARAH A 9498 JARROD AVE 5 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240015 F4 KOUBELE BRIAN & SHERYL 9336 JEFFERY AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240018 F4 WALKER DUSTIN J 9488 JEFFERY AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240019 F4 CONNER BRADLEY C& KATHLEEN M 9454 JEFFERY AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240020 F4 BUI VU H& TRINH T NGUYEN 9426 JEFFERY AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240021 F4 SMITN KERI & JASON JELINEK 9402 JEFFERY AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240022 F4 LINDSTROM 10N C& TINA M 9370 JEFFERY AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240023 F4 IENZ MICHAEL G 9358 JEFFERY AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240024 F4 THOMAS BRENDAJ & ROBB P 9497 JEFFERY AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240025 F4 ZYWIECJOSEPHI 9471JEFFERYAVE l$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240026 F4 CARROLLALONA 9433JEFFERYAVES 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240027 F4 PEPER GLEN C& SNARI L 9415 JEFFERY AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240028 F4 PLETSCH THOMAS G 9399 JEFFERY AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240082 F4 FROSCH STEVEN M& ASHLEY M 9304 JERGEN AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
Preliminary Assessment Roll
District F4 Pavement Replacement
Parcel ID District Owner Address Units $/Unit Total /Unit
2202721240083 F4 LARSEN TRACI A K& WILLIAM D 9316 JERGEN AVE 5 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240084 F4 HAWKINSCHRISTOPHERJ&CHRISTINAAHAWKINS 9338JERGENAVES 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
22027Z1240085 F4 ANDERSON KAREN L 9342 JERGEN AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240086 F4 MARSH PETER G& NANETTE L 93521ERGEN AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240087 F4 BUETOWMARKA&KIMBERIYA 9374JERGENPLS 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240088 F4 SKIFFINGTONTIMOTHY&lESSICANATiERSTAD 9382JERGENPLS 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240089 F4 BIEZEJENNAG&TIMOTHYA 9390JERGENPLS 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240090 F4 LOSHEK ROBERTJ & LAURA K 9398 JERGEN PLS 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240091 F4 MIKHAIL WALID A 9406 JERGEN PL S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240092 F4 CARRINGTON NATHAN T& AMANDA J MARTIN 9416 JERGEN PL 5 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240093 F4 ANDERSON ERIC D& DIANE G 9424 JERGEN PL 5 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240094 F4 B10KNE LAUREN & LAVONNE 9432 JERGEN PL S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240095 F4 FIGLMILLERIOANC&JEFFREYJ 9440JERGENPLS 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240096 F4 LICHTBLAU 1AMES G& CAROLYN 9448 JERGEN PL S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240097 F4 BRANUMSCOIT&1AMIEW 9456JERGENPLS 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240098 F4 DUNCAN AARON L 9464JERGEN PLS 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240099 F4 FLUEGEL MATT W& SHANNON K 9480 JERGEN PL S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240100 F4 KOENIGMARYT 9490JERGENPLS 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240104 F4 GOETZKE ALESHA K& ADAM T 9299 JERGEN AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240105 F4 HENSEL BRIAN M& JUANITA A 9307 JERGEN AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240106 F4 KUMMER EDWARD L& MAITHEW S BARRETTE 9313 JERGEN AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240107 F4 WAXLER KATHRYN M 9327 JERGEN AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240108 F4 NISTLER NATHAN 1& ATHENA C 9339 JERGEN AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240109 F4 MOONE RONALD P 9347 JERGEN AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240110 F4 HANSON SCOTTJ & JANET R 9359 JERGEN AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240111 F4 SCHUHWERCK JEFFRY P& DEBRA P 9365 JERGEN AVE 5 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240112 F4 MARTIN ANTHONY & ROCHELIE 9377 JERGEN AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240113 F4 JOHNSON RYAN 8 94831ERGEN AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240114 F4 WEBER CHELSEY D 94951ERGEN AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
Totals 151 $457,780.66
2014 P�►VEMEIVT MANAGEMENT
Appendix E
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Overview
A visual inspection was perforined in 2013 to evaluate paveinent surface conditions by identifying
various pavement defects.
Pavements can deteriorate at different rates due to many factors, including: original construction
procedures, construction materials, traffic voluine, drainage characteristics, and subsequent pavement
inaintenance. Due to this, paveinents constructed at the same time may not deteriorate at the same rate
and may ha�e different useful lives.
It should be noted that not all pavements with the same or similar PCI will look exactly the same.
Various types and amounts of distress contribute to a particular PCI ratulg. Identifying the cause of the
distress (load related vs. non-load related) is important in understanding the current pavement condition
and potential rehabilitation methods. In addition, segments of the same street may in vary in condition
and a representative rating for the majority of the segment is determined.
Generally speaking, pavements deteriorate slowly over the first ten years and then tend to deteriorate
more quickly. As pavement ages and surface cracking occurs, additional moisture is able to enter the
pavement structure and accelerate deterioration. Early preventative maintenance can extend the life of
pavement by protecting the pavement structure from the effects of inoisture and weathering. If a
paveinent is left without maintenance, the pavement condition can deteriorate very rapidly towards the
end of the lifecycle. This deterioration is illustrated in the following figure from the City's 1994
Pavement Management Plan:
: f �
_ ._. __. _. _, . ..,
F
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Figure E1- PCI vs Age
�
�
O
�
C]
�
O
C.?
�
�
�
I.LJ
�
d
�
AlUMBER VEi�B,�� C�N� I 710H �P f C�L kAA ! NTENANC�
,�.AT I N� �tAT I NG SaRf1UP F_IVG ,NU�AB�R RAT I NG �;QA I R
r 10� --- �� - ���—� y ,� . C4ST�L i n. Ft .
I �XCei lent �_'
^ s� pau�m that
noua �at�'E or �YPica Str�et Life
� �y Rb tj�9�fQS5. ���
u S$d� r.08t �$�.2'.Fl-'�3•5d)
Very Gaad �♦
Pavamcnfs thnt hoVe !
'°74 a a[gnifacart leual ��
of dlatrosb. �
� nnn—l rel�t�d. ♦
__ ��' G4Qd Rpvement3 tfiot have ��
a eTgnif�c�ant level �
Pf diotrG9a. �
.r�a load raloted. �
dverlay ($10,pQ�$30.a6}
Fe[r ti
�� �qvam.�hta ldt�� f�4VC 1 �
�
Poor rc�jor distrass. \
.� � _ \ ,
`
. �
+ Fteconetruct�an \ ($40.U4—S75.Ot1}
-�� Yery Poor Pavemont� that hav� ``�`
i y�Egni#ettlert amounts �
of n,ajor dts#re3s. �.
�- � a �'�
� ra�i�d
3 i 5 ( YEARS� � �t� �5
� _
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Core 17 — Jeffery Court
Layer Modulus (ksi)
Station Bituminous �'gBa eate Subgrade VaRlue'
0 43
39
61
56
Pavement Cores were extracted to determine the thickness of the existing street section and evaluate
pa�ement condition.
Based on the condition of the cores, we selected two extremes for an initial comparison by F WD analysis.
Both roads were built during a s'vnilar timeframe (1993 and 1994) and should have similar traffic. With
a minor exception, the backcalculated modulus of the bituminous layer (E1) is much higher where the
layer is intact (Jergen Bay, Core 15) than where top-down stripping/raveling is observed and additional
stripping was noted throughout the core (Jeffrey Court, Core 17).
Core 15 — Jergen Bay
Layer Modulus (ksi)
Station Bituminous AgBa eate Subgrade Value'
0 459 43 18 30
118 411 54 18 30
226 475 36 20 33
309 683 9 31 54
429 175 19 35 62
Appendix F
Pavement Cores
200
106 251
205 247
297 282
31
26
37
39
54
45
65
69
Cottage
J Grove
� Pride anapCOSPerity Meet
� s .., ,. � .;�w
�'��. _
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
,
_ ._. _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __.
Pavement Core #17: Jeffeiy Ct, core broken, severe stripping at top of core, extending entire depth.
� _ _ -_ _ ---
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project
Pavement Core #15: Jergen Bay S, core intact.
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Appendix G
Falling Weight Deflectometer
Cottage
J Grove
� Pride anaPC�sPerity Meet
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project
Report of Pavement Tes#ing and Repair
Recommendations
Various City Streets
Cottage Grove, Minnesota
Prepared for
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Professional Certification:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report
was prepared by me or under my direct supervision
and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer
under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Matthew S. Oman, PE
Associate / Senior Enginee
Licens,e Number: 43893
December 9, 2013
Project SP-13-06655
` ���fi��W S. p "`,L;!�ii,
- � qy
ED
PRQF � ��
ENG �
� �C
,sT' S
' 'y.......••.� 1 Cr
r �''�o� OF M�N
�raun Intertec Corporation
Braun Intertec Corposaiion
1826 Buerkle Road
Saint Paul, MN 55i10
December 9, 2013
Mr. Michael Boex
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
2035 County Road Q East, Suite B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Re: Report of Pavement Testing and Repair Recommendations
Various City Streets
Cottage Grove, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Boex:
Phone: 6 5 1 •4S7•3z45
Fax: 65i.487.18i2
Web: braunintertec.com
Project SP-13-06655
We are pleased to present this Pavement Testing Report for variaus Cottage Grove streets. The purpose
of the testing was to characterize the existing base and subgrade and to evaluate the strength of the in-
place pavement should a mill-and-overlay be performed.
Please see the attached report for a detailed discussion on the test results and our recommendations.
The report should be read in its entirety.
Thank you for making Braun Intertec your pavement consultant forthis project. If you have questions
about this report, or if there are other services that we can provide in support of our work to date, please
call Amy Grothaus at 651.261.7122.
Sincerely,
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION
,
s� �
Amy J. Groth
Senior Project Manager/Engineer
Matthew S. Oman, PE
Associate/Senior Engineer
Pavement Testing Report
E',�/�t3� �S°�ai�z�€� ��€�r�a��a°iaa� crgee� �avi�°rsac�ne�a��P ����€f7�a�.,� �a�aa:z� �� s7
Table of Contents
Description
Page
A . Introduction ......................................................................................................................................1
A.1. Project Description ..............................................................................................................1
A.2. Purpose ................................................................................................................................1
A.3. Bacl<ground Information and Reference Documents ..........................................................1
A.4. Scope of Services .................................................................................................................1
B. Results ..............................................................................................................................................2
B.1. Pavement Core and Hand Auger Results ............................................................................2
B.2. FWD Data Tabulations .........................................................................................................4
B.3. FWD Results ........................................................................................................................4
C. Basis for Recommendations .............................................................................................................9
C.1. Design Details ......................................................................................................................9
C.1.a. Potential Pavement Repairs ...................................................................................9
C.1.b. CurrentTraffic ........................................................................................................9
C.1.c. Anticipated Grade Changes ....................................................................................9
C.1.d. Precautions RegardingChanged Information ......................................................10
C.2. Design and Construction Considerations ..........................................................................10
C.2.a. Pavement History .................................................................................................10
D. Recommendations .........................................................................................................................10
D.1.a. Pavement Repair ..................................................................................................10
D.1.b. Design Sections ....................................................................................................11
E. Procedures ......................................................................................................................................12
E.1. Pavement Coring and Hand Augers ..................................................................................12
E.2. Falling Weight Deflectometer ...........................................................................................12
E.2.a. Field Testing .........................................................................................................12
E.2.b. Deflection Data Analysis .......................................................................................12
E.2.b.1. Input Data ................................................................................................12
E.2.b.2. Adjustment Factors .................................................................................13
E.2.b.3. Analyses ...................................................................................................13
F. Qualifications ..................................................................................................................................14
F.1. Use of Report .....................................................................................................................14
F.2. Standard of Care ................................................................................................................14
Appendix A— Core Location SI<etch
Appendix B— Detailed FWD Results
Appendix C — Modulus Summary
A. Introduction
A.1. Project Description
This Pavement Evaluation Report addresses approximately 4.8 miles of bituminous City streets. The
evaluation of the above streets included pavement coring and hand augers, followed by Falling Weight
Deflectometer (FWD) testing.
A.2. Purpose
The purpose of the testing was to characterize the existing base and subgrade and to evaluate the
strength of the in-place pavement should a mill-and-overlay be performed.
A.3. Background Information and Reference Documents
To facilitate our evaluation, we were provided with or reviewed the following information or documents:
■ A project location map, provided by Bolton & Menlc, Inc (Bolton & Menk).
■ Pavement core and hand auger data provided by Bolton & Menk, and conducted by Northern
Technologies, Inc. (NTI).
■ Aerial maps available from Google Earth.
■ Traffic data and construction history data provided by Bolton & Menk.
■ Soil maps available from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Web Soil
Survey.
A.4. Scope of Services
Our scope of services for this project was submitted as a Proposal to Mr. Michael Boex, dated October 4,
2013. We received authorization to proceed on October 22, 2013. Our scope of services was performed
under the terms of our September 1, 2013, General Conditions. Taslcs performed in accordance with our
authorized scope of services included:
�'.�� G�3� ;:.�.� �s�:';a
�iV��f`1 �1..
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Project SP-13-06655
December 9, 2013
Page 2
■ Performing pavement coring and hand augers on project area streets not previously cored.
This included the southern 1.3 miles (the northern 3.5 miles was cored by NTI).
■ Performing Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) testing on 4.8 miles of city streets at an
approximate test interval of one test every 100 feet.
■ Preparing this report containing a project location sl<etch, a summary of all pavement core
and hand auger results, FWD deflection data and analysis results, including spring load
capacity (tons per axle), subgrade R-value, granular equivalency, and layer modulus. Also
included is a discussion regarding the strength of the in-place pavement should a mill-and-
overlay be performed.
B. Results
B.1. Pavement Core and Hand Auger Results
Exploration locations 1 through 14 were performed by NTI and locations 15 through 24 were performed
by Braun Intertec. All locations are shown on the attached sketch. For locations 15 through 24, the
bituminous and aggregate base layer thicicnesses were measured in the field. Thicicness data for
locations 1 through 14 was provided to us by Bolton & Menk, Inc. On average, the streets had
approximately 3.6 inches of bituminous overlying 7.6 inches of aggregate base material. A summary of
the data is provided in Table 1 and was used in the analysis of the FWD data.
Cores 15 through 24 were returned to our office and were examined to assess bituminous material
conditions. Conditions were also reviewed with Bolton & Menl< staff. Material stripping or loss of
material was observed in several of the cores. For the most part, this phenomenon was confined to the
upper 1 to 2 inches of the core in the bituminous wear course; however, in some instances, stripping was
present in both the wear and non-wear courses. In several of the cores, the material loss had
deteriorated to the point of causing a separation or breal< in the upper 1/2 to 2 inches of the core, as
noted in the Table.
�
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Project SP-13-06655
December 9, 2013
Page 3
Where present, this loss of material may diminish the life of an applied maintenance treatment,
depending on the extent and severity of the stripping. Bituminous layers with low-severity stripping can
often support pavement overlays, while more severe stripping may present problems during
construction (such as the milling train breaking through the bituminous layer on thin pavements) and
reduced support for overlays over the long term.
Table 1. Bituminous Core and Hand Auger Results
Bituminous Aggregate Base
Location Street Thickness (in) Thickness (in) Core Condition/Notes
1* 91st Street S 4.00 6.00 Stripping in upper 1.5 inches of core
2* Janero Ave 5 3.25 6.50 Good condition
3* Jareau Ave 5 3.75 10.50 Stripping in upper 2.0 inches of core
4* Jasmine Ave S 4.50 8.00 Good condition
5* Jeffrey Ave S 4.25 7.00 Core broken; stripping throughout entire core
6* Jensen Ave S 3.75 10.25 Good condition
7* Jergen Ave S 3.00 8.00 Good condition
8* Jarvis Ave S 3.75 8.00 Stripping in upper 2.0 inches of core
9* Jeffrey Ave S 4.50 9.00 Stripping in upper 2.0 inches of core
10* Jergen Court S 3.75 5.50 Good condition
11* Jergen Ave S 3.25 7.75 Core broken; stripping throughout entire core
12* Jeffrey Ave S 3.75 8.00 Stripping in upper 2.5 inches of core
13* 93rd Street S 3.25 7.50 Core broken; stripping throughout entire core
14* 93rd Street S 3.25 6.25 Stripping in upper 2.0 inches of core
15 Jergen Bay 3.75 6.75 Good condition
16 92nd Street 238 7.13 Stripping in lower 1.0 inch of core
17 Jeffrey Court 4.00 6.00 Core broken; stripping throughout entire core
18 Jareau Ave S 3.13 8.88 Strippingthroughout entire core
19 Jareau Ave 5 3.25 7.25 Core brol<en at top; stripping throughout entire core
20 Jarrod Ave S 3.00 9.00 Stripping in upper 1.5 inches of core
21 lasmine Ave S 3.50 8.00 Core broken at top; strippi�g in upper 2.0 inches of
��������
�
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Project SP-13-06655
December 9, 2013
Page 4
B.2. FWD Data Tabulations
A summary of the deflection data is available in Appendix B. For all tested routes, spring load capacity,
effective GE, and effective subgrade R-value are shown.
Section E.3.b.3 provides a summary of the data analysis methods used to obtain the above information.
Included in Appendix C are backcalculation results using the Evaluation of Layer Moduli and Overlay
Design (ELMOD) analysis tool. The ELMOD tool provides a layer modulus (kips per square inch) for each
of the pavement layers by analyzing the pavement's response from the FWD.
B.3. FWD Results
The deflection data analysis results are statistical estimates representing values calculated for the test
locations alongthe roadway. The MnDOTTONN method is a conservative approach to assessing load
capacity. The method talces the 15th percentile of spring-load capacity values (given in tons per axle) for
a given segment of roadway, which means that 85 percent of the test points have a load capacity higher
than the presented values. Effective R-value and GE use the same standard.
Table 2 provides a summary of the input data provided for each test route. Thickness data was obtained
from the bituminous core and hand auger results and traffic data was provided by Bolton & Menk. For
streets that were not cored, construction history and proximity to cored streets were used to provide
likely assumed thicknesses.
*Cores 1 through 14 were performed by NTI.
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Project SP-13-06655
December 9, 2013
Page 5
Table 3 summarizes the results for each of the roadways using ELMOD. Bituminous layer moduli ranged
from 118 to 980; aggregate base moduli ranged from 24 to 65; and subgrade layer moduli ranged from
10 to 33. For those streets that were not cored, the assumed thicicness data may have attributed to the
high moduli results. Given the testing rate, variability in the raw and processed data is possible.
The overlay requirement provided in Table 3 is the equivalent bituminous thickness that is required for
20 years of the anticipated traffic. This is what is needed to prevent failure-level fatigue (bituminous) or
rutting (aggregate base/subgrade). Since most values are 0.0, the structural demand is generally very
minor for the given traffic levels. In this case, functional issues, such as materials problems and
associated surface distresses, are more likely to occur. R-values provided in the table were converted
from the resilient modulus using ELMOD.
Table 2. FWD Input Data
Core Data
Core Data Aggregate Aggregate
Bituminous Base Bituminous Base
Length Thickness Thickness Thickness Thickness
Street From To (ft) AADT (in) (in) (in) (in)
91st Street S Cul
91st Street S Cul de sac 95 300 -- -- 4.00 6.00
de sac, West
91st Street S Cul
91st Street S Cul de sac 107 300 -- -- 4.00 6.00
de sac, East
91st Street S Islay Ave 5 Jareau Ave S 1401 500 4.00 6.00 4.00 6.00
92nd Street 5 Jergen Ave S Cul de sac 176 300 238 7.13 2.38 7.13
92nd Street S Jarvis Ave S Jeffrey Ave S 612 300 -- -- 3.75 10.50
93rd Street S Jareau Ave S Jasmine Ave S 320 300 -- -- 3.50 8.00
3.25 7.50
93rd Street S Jeffrey Court Jergen Ave S 818 300 3.25 6.25 3.25 6.88
Janero Ave S 91st Street S 90th Street S 697 500 3.25 6.50 3.25 6.50
Jareau Ave S Cul
Jareau Ave S Cul de sac 194 300 -- -- 3.75 10.50
de sac
Jareau Ave S 90th Street S 91st Street 5 510 1700 3.75 10.50 3.75 10.50
Jareau Ave S 91st Street S Dead End 2326 1700 3.13 8.88 3.19 8.06
W�' �a�. �`-"� � F��
Ih�TERTEC
Bolton & Menlc, Inc.
Project SP-13-06655
December 9, 2013
Page 6
Core Data
Core Data Aggregate Aggregate
Bituminous Base Bituminous Base
Length Thickness Thickness Thickness Thickness
Street From To (ft) AADT (in) (in) (in) (in)
3.25 7.25
Jareau Ave S Jareau Ave S
Jarrod Ave S 1378 300 3.00 9.00 3.00 9.00
(North) (South)
Jarvis Ave S 91st Street S 92nd Street S 583 300 3.75 8.00 3.75 8.00
Jasmine Ave S
Jasmine Ave S Cul de sac 209 300 -- -- 4.55 8.00
Cul de sac West
Jasmine Ave S
Jasmine Ave S Cul de sac 83 300 -- -- 4.50 8.00
Cul de sac East
Jasmine Ave 5 Dead End Jeffrey Ave S 715 500 3.50 8.00 3.50 8.00
Jasmine Ave S 90th Street S Cul de sac 1207 500 4.50 8.00 4.50 8.00
Jeffrey Ave 5 Cul
Jeffrey Ave S Cul de sac 161 300 -- -- 4.50 9.00
de sac (2)
Jeffrey Ave S Cul
de sac (3) �effrey Ave 5 Cul de sac 104 300 -- -- 4.25 7.00
Jeffrey Ave S Cul
Jeffrey Ave S Cul de sac 24 300 -- -- 4.50 9.00
de sac (1)
Jeffrey Ave S 93rd Street S Dead End 420 1700 3.13 7.38 3.13 738
4.25 7.00
Jeffrey Ave S 90th Street S Jeffrey Court 2259 1700 4.50 9.00 4.20 8.00
3.75 8.00
Jeffrey Bay Jeffrey Ave S Cul de sac 92 300 -- -- 3.75 8.00
Jeffrey Court Jeffrey Ave 5 Cul de sac 297 300 4.00 6.00 4.00 6.00
Jensen Ave S Jeffrey Ave S 90th Street S 1200 500 3.75 10.25 3.75 10.25
Jergen Ave S 93rd Street 5 Dead End 714 1700 3.50 7.50 3.50 7.50
Jergen Ave Cul de
Jergen Ave S Cul de sac 38 300 -- -- 3.00 8.00
sac
Jergen Ave S Jergen Bay S 90th Street S 1118 1700 3.00 8.00 3.00 8.00
Jergen Bay S Jergen Ave S Cul de sac 429 300 3.75 6.75 3.75 6.75
Jergen Court S Jergen Ave S Cul de sac ' 329 300 3.75 5.50 3.75 5.50
� � � � �
INTERT�C
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Project SP-13-06655
December 9, 2013
Page 7
Core Data
Core Data Aggregate Aggregate
Bituminous Base Bituminous Base
Length Thickness Thickness Thickness Thickness
Street From To (ft) AADT (in) (in) (in) (in)
Jergen Place Jergen Ave S Cul de sac 345 300 4.25 6.25 4.25 6.25
Janie Ave S 91st Street S 90th Street S 748 500 -- -- 3.25 6.50
Jergen Ave S 93rd StreetS Jergen Bay 5 907 1700 3.25 7.75 3.25 7.75
91st Street S Jareau Ave S Jeffrey Ave S 1220 500 -- -- 4.25 9.20
Table 3. ELMOD FWD Results
Bituminous Aggregate Subgrede Overlay
Layer Modulus Base Layer Layer Requirement
Street From To R-Value (E1) Modulus (E2) Modulus (E3) (in)
91st Street S Cul
91st Street S Cul de sac 34 268 45 20 0.0
de sac, West
91st Street S Cul
91st Street S Cul de sac 33 341 43 20 0.0
de sac, East
91st Street S Islay Ave S Jareau Ave S 29 406 65 17 0.0
91st Street S Jareau Ave S Jeffrey Ave 5 36 545 32 21 0.1
92nd Street S Jergen Ave S Cul de sac 38 359 32 22 0.3
92nd Street S Jarvis Ave S Jeffrey Ave 5 37 760 30 21 0.2
Jasmine Ave
93rd Street S Jareau Ave S 5 43 371 47 25 0.0
93rd Street S Jeffrey Court Jergen Ave S 51 337 59 29 0.0
Janero Ave S 91st Street S 90th Street S 32 522 41 19 0.2
Jareau Ave S Cul
Jareau Ave S Cul de sac 35 807 33 20 0.0
de sac
Jareau Ave S 90th Street S 91st Street S 41 566 32 24 0.1
Jareau Ave S 91st Street S Dead End 42 520 42 24 03
Jareau Ave S Jareau Ave S
Jarrod Ave S 54 495 51 31 0.0
(North) (South)
+• �
�
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Project SP-13-06655
December 9, 2013
Page 8
Bituminous Aggregate Subgrade Overlay
Layer Modulus Base Layer Layer Requirement
Street From To R-Value (E1) Modulus (E2) Modulus (E3) (in)
Jarvis Ave S 91st Street S 92nd Street S 37 325 47 21 0.0
Jasmine Ave S Cul
Jasmine Ave S Cul de sac 32 238 26 19 0.0
de sac West
Jasmine Ave 5 Cul
Jasmine Ave S Cul de sac 16 631 38 10 0.0
de sac East
Jasmine Ave S Dead End Jeffrey Ave S 54 206 48 31 0.0
Jasmine Ave S 90th Street S Cul de sac 30 285 24 17 0.1
Jeffrey Ave S Cul
de sac (2) �effrey Ave S Cul de sac 41 183 27 24 0.0
Jeffrey Ave 5 Cul
Jeffrey Ave S Cul de sac 44 469 45 25 0.0
de sac (3)
Jeffrey Ave S Cul
Jeffrey Ave S Cul de sac 35 321 42 21 0.0
de sac (1)
Jeffrey Ave 5 93rd Street S Dead End 51 236 55 29 0.1
Jeffrey Ave S 90th Street S Jeffrey Court 52 331 42 30 0.1
Jeffrey Bay Jeffrey Ave S Cul de sac 43 118 32 25 0.0
Jeffrey Court Jeffrey Ave S Cul de sac 58 245 50 33 0.0
Jensen Ave S Jeffrey Ave S 90th Street S 42 915 26 24 0.4
Jergen Ave S 93rd Street S Dead End 40 372 39 23 0.6
Jergen Ave Cul de
Jergen Ave S Cul de sac 25 980 28 15 0.1
sac
Jergen Ave S 93rd Street 5 Jergen Bay S 46 443 39 26 0.5
Jergen Ave S Jergen Bay S 90th Street S 49 764 29 28 1.0
Jergen Bay S lergen Ave S Cul de sac 42 440 32 24 0.2
Jergen Court S Jergen Ave S Cul de sac 32 198 48 19 0.0
Jergen Place Jergen Ave S Cul de sac 55 246 24 32 0.2
Janie Ave S 91st Street S 90th Street S 34 455 64 20 0.0
��NV B�
INTERTEC
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Project SP-13-06655
December 9, 2013
Page 9
C. Basis for Recommendations
C.1. Design Details
C.1.a. Potential Pavement Repairs
Based on our discussions with Bolton & Menk and the variable conditions of the streets within the
project area, for ease of construction and equipment mobilization, we recommend that full-removal of
the existing bituminous be performed on the tested streets. This is based on a number of factors and
concerns regarding mill-and-overlay including:
■ Several of the locations were observed to have material stripping throughout the entire core
in both the bituminous wear and non-wear courses. Due to the condition of the bituminous
layers, there is a possibility that the remaining in-place bituminous will not support
construction equipment.
■ It is possible that underlying bituminous layers that exhibit stripping will negatively affect the
life of the overlay.
■ Bolton & Menl< performed several test mills in the project area. These areas were found to
be very thin and were easily broken apart.
■ The City's Public Works Department has had to perform numerous spot repairs throughout
the project area. There is a good possibility that the underlying distresses will reflect
through the new bituminous overlay.
C.1.b. Current Traffic
Traffic data was provided by Bolton & Menk and is shown in Table 2.
C.1.c. Anticipated Grade Changes
We expect that grade changes will be minimal for this project.
� �� �� � �_�
I�ITERT��
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Project SP-13-06655
December 9, 2013
Page 10
C.1.d. Precautions Regarding Changed Information
We have attempted to describe our understanding of the proposed issues to the extent they were
reported to us by Bolton & Menk. Depending on the extent of available information, assumptions may
have been made based on our experience with similar projects. If we have not correctly recorded or
interpreted the project details, we should be notified. New or changed information could require
additional evaluation, analyses and/or recommendations.
C.2. Design and Construction Considerations
C.2.a. Pavement History
Based on the information provided, the tested streets were constructed between 1979 and 1997 and
vary between 16 and 34 years in age. Since that time, we understand that the streets have had frequent
localized maintenance performed on them that includes patching and crack filling. The City is currently
seal coating streets using a seven-year cycle. We understand that the tested streets have all been seal
coated at least once, with some having been seal coated multiple times. To date, none ofthe tested
streets have received a major repair, such as an overlay.
We did not review condition data as part of this project; however, we understand that the tested streets
likely have multiple distresses that are being concealed by the seal coat treatments.
Given the age of the pavements and the likely distresses, we assume that most of the streets are within
the major repair maintenance category. Pavements in this category are lil<ely beyond benefitting from
further preventive maintenance. Additionally, without repair, pavements within this repair category can
deteriorate rapidly into the reconstruction category. Restoring these pavements now will be more cost-
effective than further prolonging maintenance.
D. Recommendations
D.1.a. Pavement Repair
We recommend the full removal of the existing bituminous pavement over the entire project area to the
top of the aggregate base. This type of treatment can be expected to last about 15 to 20 years while
reusing in-place materials and eliminating the potential for reflective cracl<ing in the bituminous layers.
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Project SP-13-06655
December 9, 2013
Page 11
Performing a full removal of the existing bituminous pavement will eliminate the potential for
construction issues with milling. It also provides the benefit of fully removing the stripped bituminous
layers and the potential forfuture issues.
Following removal of the bituminous pavement, we recommended that the in-place aggregate be
regraded and compacted. Following compaction, the aggregate base should be proof rolled to check for
the presence of localized weak areas. The proofroll should be performed with a fully loaded trucic. The
proofroll should be observed by a geotechnical engineer or qualified observer. Any detected weak areas
should be corrected prior to the placement of the new bituminous pavement.
D.1.b. Design Sections
For the residential streets with a reported ADT of 300 to 500, the projected 20-year Bituminous
Equivalent Single Axle Loads (BESAL) ranges from approximately 31,000 to 56,000 ESALs. The average R-
value derived from FWD testing for these streets is 38. For these sections, the average in-place
pavement section includes 3.8 inches of bituminous overlying 7.6 to 8.0 inches of aggregate base. Using
this projected traffic and an R-value of 38, the required granular equivalency (GE) is approximately 10.0
inches. Following full removal of the existing bituminous pavement on these streets, a design section of
3.5 inches of new bituminous is recommended as per the minimum required bituminous. This follows
the City's standard for residential streets. Underlying the bituminous is approximately 7.6 to 8.0 inches
of existing aggregate base. Assuming the in-place aggregate base performs as a newly placed base layer,
a GE of 15.88 inches is provided.
For streets with a reported ADT of 1,700, the projected 20-year BESALs is approximately 181,000 and the
average R-value derived from FWD testing is 45. For these sections, the average in-place pavement
section includes 3.5 inches of bituminous overlying 8.1 inches of aggregate base. The required GE for
these streets is 10.14 inches. Following full removal of the existing bituminous pavement on these
streets, the City's standard design section of 3.5 inches of new bituminous is recommended, overlying
approximately 8.1 inches of existing aggregate base. Assuming the in-place aggregate base perForms as a
newly placed base layer, a GE of 15.88 inches is provided.
The above designs are based on a 20-year performance life. This perFormance life assumes maintenance,
such as sealcoating and crack sealing, is routinely performed. The actual pavement life will vary
depending on variations in weather, traffic conditions and maintenance.
� �`� °�� �� ���
1 NTE RT�C
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Project SP-13-06655
December 9, 2013
Page 12
E. Procedures
E.1. Pavement Coring and Hand Augers
Core locations 15 through 24 were selected by Bolton & Menk and were conducted by Braun Intertec on
October 11, 2013. All cores were performed using a 4-inch core barrel and the bituminous pavement
was repaired with a cold-mix bituminous patch immediately after coring. The cores were measured to
obtain approximate bituminous thicl<ness and their material conditions were noted based on visual
observation.
E.2. Falling Weight Deflectometer
E.2.a. Field Testing
A Dynatest Model 8002E FWD was used for deflection testing. This equipment is a trailer-mounted
device that measures the pavement deflection due to an applied impulse load. Four impulse loads were
applied at each test point in a single direction of travel at an approximate interval of 100 feet.
Field testing was conducted on October 9, 2013. Data collected by the FWD during testing include the
deflections, impulse loads, pavement surface temperature, and the ambient airtemperature.
E.2.b. Deflection Data Analysis
E.2.b.1. Input Data
The following data are utilized as analysis inputs to generate structural information from the deflection
data:
■ Traffic loadings (provided by Bolton & Menk)
■ Pavement layerthicl<nesses (core and hand auger data, provided by NTI and Braun Intertec)
■ Subgrade soil type (Braun Intertec)
■ Pavement temperatures (Braun Intertec)
■ Previous day temperature (National Weather Service)
■ Pavement deflection data (Braun Intertec)
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Project SP-13-06655
December 9, 2013
Page 13
E.2.b.2. Adjustment Factors
Flexible pavement systems consisting of bituminous layers, aggregate bases, and subgrade soils, are
normally frozen during winter and very weak during spring thaw. Deflection testing is normally not
recommended during either season. Measured deflections in summer and fall seasons are adjusted to
reflect spring season condition when the pavement system is in its wealcest state. Seasonal correction
factors recommended by MnDOT are used for this purpose.
Deflection is inversely proportional to the stiffness of flexible pavements. Since stiffness in flexible
pavements is temperature dependent, measured deflections are adjusted to the standard 80 degrees
Fahrenheit for deflection data analysis using MnDOT procedure. The FWD equipment is equipped with
an infrared temperature sensor for measuring pavement surface temperature. Using the BELLS model
developed from FHWA-LTPP test sections, the mid-depth asphalt temperature is estimated from the
surface temperature and previous day average air temperature. The resulting factor is used to convert
the calculated mid-depth temperature to the standard 80 degrees Fahrenheit mid-depth temperature.
The Temperature Adjustment Factor (TAF) and Seasonal Correction Factor (SCF) are then used to adjust
the measured deflection to an equivalent spring season deflection at the reference temperature of 80F.
E.2.b.3. Analyses
The Braun Intertec Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) program was used for analysis of the deflection data to
estimate the effective subgrade R-value and the effective GE. NDT incorporates flexible pavement
thickness design relationships from MnDOT, along with those from the 1993 Guide for Design of
PavementStructures, published by AASHTO. The following briefly defines the parameters presented in
this report:
TONN Sprin� Load Capacity-The MnDOTTONN method (revised from MnDOT Investigation 603) is used
for spring load capacity estimations. The TONN method uses pavement section information (bituminous
thickness), FWD center deflections (normalized to 9 kips), and seasonal and temperature adjustment
factors to provide an estimate of load capacity for a given pavement segment.
Effective R-value - Effective R-value provides a measure ofthe stifFness of the pavement subgrade soil.
R-value calculations are computed using the Hogg Model, which represents the subgrade as a soil mass
of finite depth over a stiff layer. Hogg Model resilient modulus values are corrected for seasonal effects
and for congruence to backcalculated resilient modulus values, and finally converted to R-value by the
method described in MnDOT Investigation 201.
�� ��'����
r
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Project SP-13-06655
December 9, 2013
Page 14
Because Hogg Model-calculated R-values are relatively conservative compared to methods where an
infinite half-space is considered, and seasonal adjustments are also used, we malce no further reduction
of the results for design purposes.
Effective Granular Equivalent (GE) - Effective GE provides values for the design of pavement structures in
inches of MnDOT Class 5 aggregate base equivalent. GE requirements are based upon anticipated 20-
year traffic loadings (ESALs) and the effective R-value of the subgrade.
Laver Moduli - To estimate pavement layer moduli, we used the ELMOD bacl<calculation software from
Dynatest, Inc. Moduli values were backcalculated for a three-layer system by the Deflection Basin Fit
method. This method uses Odemark-Boussinesq equations to fit the measured deflection basin to
that a theoretical pavement system using set convergence criteria. The overlay requirements are
then calculated using these layer stiffnesses, ESAL estimates and rutting or fatigue failure criteria
provided in ELMOD.
We converted the subgrade moduli values to R-value using relationships established by AASHTO. Note
that the raw backcalculated moduli presented in the report are not corrected for air and pavement
temperature at the time of testing or seasonal variation, and the results could vary considerably if testing
takes places during other seasons or times-of-day. Overlay requirements, however, do account for
seasonal variation of pavement moduli.
F. Qualifications
F.1. Use of Report
This report is for the exclusive use of the parties to which it has been addressed. Without written
approval, we assume no responsibility to other parties regarding this report. Our evaluation, analyses
and recommendations may not be appropriate for other parties or projects.
F.2. Standard of Care
In perForming its services, Braun Intertec used that degree of care and sl<ill ordinarily exercised under
similar circumstances by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality. No
warranty, express or implied, is made.
Appendix A
� <`�; � �� ��
INT��TE�
I
� � ! �
, ✓--'`\.
I ��� �
. ; �
� _ _—: _ . .
' 1
, - ` - .v."..�. _
, � , __ , � , ; -
�
� � - , , l�
� �, � 3
, , , j
I � y , ; ' ,`l
�,- ,..._. �...... i
� I -
' � � — `� � �'.�� I ...I ' �
.. —I ; :--
--�; '� � ....I I_ I
` 1 � .................
�, �
__ ,, I O _ �.__ �
�.
,
� � i � I" � ^ j I �
� �- � ' _:.., i .� j� ''--...
-_ . I _ , - �. � - r i
,__ .� . _.... . ._.— ... . .
�
i - n ' �
�I I ......... . I I .
i
'�. i '' ..................
i � !
_ .......J i I`� ... -. .
� I I I .. ��0�8 -
�
il — � �� �, ,.,. �
,_.� i
� ............ .. , \• _ .. ' �.
.......... _..._.. .�_' � '
� � -� �_ j� �) ...._ %�'�
� �, I I � � � � �� �� �I �
Q eITUMINOUSCORE ' i — � \�
(ADDITIONAL) .—� J� __ .�
j . I�.__ , /� .
I � � i �. i
Q BITUMINOUS CORE � .... ' ...................�
(PREVIOUSLY COMPLETED BY NTI) ��������������������������� � '
�
� CONSTRUCTED7979 f, � - I
f �
CONSTRl1CTED7987 --
� CONSTRUCTED1988 I ) �
� , CONSTRUCTED 7989 I ,—"�--
--
..r'�"„�,T.y CONSTRUCTE�1990 I f�il ----
,u � CONSTRUCTED1993 I
� � �-� �. CONSTRUCTED 1994 �', III
� CONSTRUCTED1997 I �
I ' .............. .........
� _..,1
� ,�
�� '
�
N � II � / �1.�._ i .,
,
;
� � � .,._.... � I I ,
,50� 0 3��� � \`` � [ I ���'//�
� ,, . � _ .
SCALE: 1"=300' �,\ \I �� �~' ��,�_
I� � � -I r.,�l
I �
�� .....�
I i, '
�
I I _
-..;
� ' �
/:'.,
I �'
`' 1'.'I
.�� {,,. ,.'„
....................I� —" .�i .t
I I'.... = � .��
\ .'..
I ........ .. '
�
___ l _ � �
_ � • 5_.--.—.- �: ,,���
" �`-
— 1 � \
�` � _ � ,�
`�'� '\ I
��
�.�:�_. , � ;;
_ _ � �
i \'�\
�-��,,..-'� � \
_ �
. ry I ` � �/
�' ;` , . . � /,r ..'.� ',
�Qi� �
�°..,, - � ��� '
_ � � � �\ ).r=.
i ,
�. = _ .,, �� � �
,�
i
�. �, , ., �_...._.._.._._ .
.
`�. \.,,.' -' ,. �
� _ � �
I'
,-
��-
� �
-^-..;_ --... ' .�_._�.�;.�..-
�---
\ � "i
. \�'..� , �I�.
\Y ` i
_..��� . � --'ti
�. l
� �'.
�a; �
---�' � �:
� ' i�i
� �� .
� �i
:'�l" �:
� ,� '�I
K� �
�—�� I 1
_I 1 , �
' I I '.�
•
\ �11 I r�
, i
�
r
sRauN
INTERTEC
1 t001 Hampshlre Avenue So.
Mlnneapolls,MN SSE38
PH.(952)99`r2000
FA%(9527 9952020
Base Dwg Provltled By.
BOLTON AND MENK, INC.
2
W
Y ¢
N F
O
D�WW
Q
U.�i��
�w�>
K Z U C
OWOw
�>�¢
oa>G
z °
� U
m
Pro�ect No:
SP1306655
Dawing No
SP1306655
Scale 1" = 300'
Dawn By &IB
�ate Dravm: 1o118�13
Checked By: AJG
Last Modifetl: 10I18113
S�eelo Flg:
�
Appendix B
3� �: �
(�lT��eT��
Braun Intertec City of Cottage Grove FWD Summary SP-13-06655
A8B Spring Load
BitThickness Thickness Design Date Previous Capacity
Roadway From To Length (ft) AADT (in) (in) HCADT Lane ESAL Tested Day Temp (tons/axle) R-value GE
91st Street S Islay Ave S Jareau Ave 5 1401 500 4 6 19.5 5 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 21.20 18.26
91stStreet S Jasmine Ave 5 Jeffrey Ave 5 479 500 4.5 9 19.5 5 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 14.89 19.80
91st Street S Jarvis Ave S Jasmine Ave 5 610 500 4.5 8 19.5 5 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 13.91 19.29
91stStreet S Jareau Ave S Jarvis Ave S 192 500 3.75 10.5 19.5 5 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 18.25 22.77
91st Street S East Cul de sac 91st Street S Cul de sac 107 300 4 6 11.7 3 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 18.71 20.35
91st Street S West Cul de sac 91st Street S Cul de sac 95 300 4 6 11.7 3 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 19.68 20.83
92nd Street S Janris Ave S Jeffrey Ave S 612 300 3.75 10.5 11.7 3 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 13.93 21.09
92nd Street 5 Jergen Ave S Cul de sac 176 300 2.375 7.125 11.7 3 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 12.41 20.57
93rd Street S Jeffrey Court Jergen Ave S 818 300 3.25 6.875 11J 3 10/9/13 17J8 10.00 19.63 22.35
93rd Street5 Jareau Ave S Jasmine Ave 5 320 300 3.5 8 11.7 3 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 19.69 23.94
lanero Ave 5 91stStreet S 90th Street S 697 500 3.25 6.5 19.5 5 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 14.68 19.05
Janie Ave S 91st Street S 90th Street S 748 500 3.25 6.5 19.5 5 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 18.02 17.95
lareau Ave S Dead End 93rd Street 5 513 1700 3.25 7.25 663 17 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 16.99 23.40
lareau Ave 5 93rd Street5 91stStreet5 1813 1700 3.125 8.875 66.3 17 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 17.54 22.45
Jareau Ave 5 90th Street S 91st5treet5 510 1700 3.75 10.5 663 17 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 23.01 23.84
lareau Ave 5 Cul de sac lareau Ave S Cul de sac 194 300 3J5 10.5 11J 3 10/9/13 17J8 10.00 17.92 21.81
larrod Ave 5 lareau Ave S(North) Jareau Ave 5(South) 1378 300 3 9 11.7 3 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 21.27 22.63
larvis Ave S 91st Street 5 92nd Street S 583 300 3.75 8 11.7 3 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 20.32 2332
Jasmine Ave 5 90th Street S Cul de sac 1207 500 4.5 8 19.5 5 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 12.33 1930
Jasmine Ave 5 Dead End leffrey Ave 5 715 500 3.5 8 19.5 S 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 22.84 23.55
Jasmine Ave 5 East Cul de sac Jasmine Ave S Cul de sac 83 300 4.5 8 11.7 3 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 18.16 23.29
Jasmine Ave S West Cul de sac lasmine Ave S Cul de sac 209 300 4.5 8 11.7 3 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 16.53 21.79
Jeffrey Ave 5 Jeffrey Ave S Cul de sac (2) Jeffrey Court 1Z50 1700 3.75 8 663 17 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 21.65 22.71
Jeffrey Ave S Jensen Ave 5 Jeffrey Ave S Cul de sac (2) 298 1700 4.5 9 663 17 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 24.47 25.22
Jeffrey Ave S 90th Street S Jensen Ave S 711 1700 4.25 7 66.3 17 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 17.55 23.19
Jeffrey Ave S 93rd Street5 Dead End 420 1700 3.125 7.375 66.3 17 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 17.68 21.04
Jeffrey Ave S Cul de sac (1) Jeffrey Ave S Cul de sac 24 300 4.5 9 11.7 3 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 18.08 22.33
Jeffrey Ave S Cul de sac (2) Jeffrey Ave S Cul de sac 161 300 4.5 9 11.7 3 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 16.42 20.83
Jeffrey Ave S Cul de sac (3) leffrey Ave S Cul de sac 104 300 4.25 7 11.7 3 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 16.38 19.90
Jeffrey Bay Jeffrey Ave 5 Cul de sac 92 300 3.75 8 11.7 3 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 13.42 21.17
Jeffrey Court Jeffrey Ave 5 Cul de sac 297 300 4 6 11.7 3 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 21.04 24.48
Jensen Ave 5 Jeffrey Ave 5 90th Street 5 1200 500 3.75 10.25 19.5 5 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 15.50 20.94
Jergen Ave 5 93rd Street S Jergen Bay S 907 1700 3.25 7.75 66.3 17 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 17.52 23.38
Jergen Ave S Jergen Bay S 90th Street5 1118 1700 3 8 663 17 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 16.48 23.43
Jergen Ave 5 93rd Street5 Dead End 714 1700 3.5 7.5 66.3 17 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 15.72 19.48
Jergen Bay South Jergen Ave S Cul de sac 429 300 3.75 6.75 11.7 3 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 18.23 21.85
Jergen Court S Jergen Ave S Cul de sac 329 300 3.75 5.5 11:7 3 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 14.18 22.06
Jergen Place Jergen Ave S Culde sac 345 300 4.25 6.25 11.7 3 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 16.60 21.43
Jergen Ave S Cul de sac Jergen Ave S Cul de sac 38 300 3 8 11.7 3 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 15.01 22.87
Appendix C
�� �
91515f 5 LU4DE-SAC, WESf
93STST 5 CUL-0FSAC, WESf
9LSf ST 5 CUL-DE-SAC, EASr
915f STS CUL-DE-SAC, EAST
915T Sf S
93SfSf5
91573T5
91STSTS
93STSTS
915rST5
935TST5
915fSf5
915TSfS
915fSf5
91ST ST 5
915f5T5
935T ST 5
915fSf5
91STSf5
915TSf5
9iSTSTS
915f5i5
91Sf5T5
91Sf Sf 5
915TST5
915TST5
9]STSfS
915f 5f 5
915f5T5
91Sf Sf 5
91SfST5
935fSfS
91SfSfS
93ST SI S
szNO n s
92NDSIS
92N05TS
92NOST5
92NDSTS
92NDSf5
92NDST5
92N�Sf5
92NDSf5
92NO5T5
92NDST5
93RDST5
93RDST5
93RD Sf 5
93ROST5
93RDST5
93RDS�5
93st5[reek5
91rt 5[reet 5
91sf Streec 5
91rt Street 5
IsiayAVe 5
IslayAVe 5
I51ayAVeS
I51ayAVe 5
IslayAVe 5
I51ayAVeS
IsiayAVe 5
islayAVe 5
IslayAVeS
isiay Ave 5
IslayAVeS
islay Ave 5
IslayAVe 5
ISIayAVeS
ISIdyAV¢5
Jareau Ave 5
JareauAVeS
Jareau Ave 5
Jareau Ave 5
Jareau AveS
Jareau AveS
Jareau Ave S
lareauAVeS
lareau AveS
lareau Ave 5
lareau / ve 5
lareau Ave 5
IareauAVeS
IareauAVeS
lareauAVeS
Iergen Ave S
lergen Ave 5
lergen Ave 5
Jarvit Av¢ 5
larvis Ave S
larvisAVeS
)arvisAVeS
larvisAV¢S
larvi5AVe5
JarvisAveS
larvisAVeS
JareauAVeS
lareau pve 5
lareau Ave 5
lareauAveS
JeffreyCaurt
JeHreywurc
Cul de s
Culdes
Cul de s
Cultles
lareauAVeS
Jareau Ave 5
lareauAVeS
IareauAVeS
Jateau AveS
Jareau Ave 5
lareauAVeS
Jareau AveS
larea�AveS
JareavAVeS
lareauAVeS
Jarea�AVeS
larea�AVeS
lareau Ave 5
Jareau Ave 5
leffreyqve5
JeffreyAVeS
JeffreyAVeS
JeHreyAVeS
JeffreyAVeS
JeffreyAVeS
JeffreyAVeS
IeffreyAVeS
JeffreyAVeS
JeffreyAVeS
leffreyAVeS
leffreyAVeS
leffreyAVeS
/effrey Ave 5
leHrey Ave 5
Culdesa
Cul de sa
Culdes
leHreyAVeS
leHreyAVeS
JeHreyAveS
Jeffrey Ave 5
JeffreyAVeS
JeffrevA�e 5
JeffreyAVeS
leffreyAVeS
JasmineAveS
JasmineAVeS
JasmineAVeS
la5mineFVeS
JergenAVeS
Jergen Ave 5
Sta[ton � Bituminous
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
m
�
m
Q
0
Q
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
Q
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�!��
fi�i
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�ill
��
��
��
��
���}
��1
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
'�' �
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
. ..._.._........ ..
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
-
-
-
�
-
�
93PDST5
93RD ST 5
93RD ST 5
93RO ST 5
93RDSTS
93RDST5
9 3RDSTS
JANEROAVES
IANER0AVE5
JANERO AVES
IANEROAVES
IANEFOAVES
JANEPOAVES
IANENOAVES
J
JANIEAVES
JANIE AVE S
JANIE AVE S
JANIE AVE 5
IANIE AVE 5
JANIEAVES
IANIEAVES
IANIEAVES
IAREAU AVE 5 NL-0E-SAC
IAREAII AVE 5 NL-OE-SHC
1HREAUAVESNL-OE-SAC
JAREAtI AVE 5
JAPEAUAVES
IAREAU AVE 5
lA0.EAUAVES
JAREAUHVES
JAREAUHVES
JAREAU AVES
JAREAUAVES
IAREAU AVES
JAREAUAVES
IAREAU AVES
JAREAUAVES
JAREAU AVE 5
IAREAU AVE 5
IAREAII AVE 5
JAREAU AVE 5
IAREAU AVE S
JAREAU AVE 5
JAREAU AVE S
JAREAU AVE 5
JAREAU AVE 5
JApEAUAVES
JAPEAtI AVE 5
IAFEAU AVE S
JA0.EAUAVES
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
��
Iti'�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
Aggregate
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
1
y
�
�
�
�
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
o�
o�
v�
v�
��
��
��
v�
��
o�
v�
v�
o�
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
���
..:�.�.) .' �.. .:I. .
33] � 59��. 29 51 � 0.0 .��
522 41 19 � � 32 � � � D.Z . ..
455 6i � 20 �� 30 � OA ���
HO] 33 20 35 �OA �
626 - 33 31 59 ��� 0.0.��
IAPEAUAVES
IAPEAUAVES
JAPEAUAVES
JAPEAU AVE 5
JApEAUAVES
1ARRODAVES
JAFRODAVES
IARRODAVES
JAFRODAVES
JAFRODAVES
� 1AFRODAVES
1AqRODAVES
IAFROOAVES
lAFRO�AVES
IAFRODAVES
1AFRODAVES
1HFRODAVES
JAFRODAVES
IAFRODAVES
IFFRODAVES
JARVIS AVE 5
� lAftViS NVE S
JAftViSAVE 5
JA0.VI5 AVE 5
JAftViSAVE 5
JAftV15 AVE 5
JARVIS AVE 5
1f5MINE AVE 5 WESTNL-OE-SAC
JASMINE AVE S WESTN4�E-SAC
JASMINE AVE S WESf NL-0E-SAC
IASMiNE FVE 5 EASf NL-0E-SAC
lASMiNE AVE 5 EASf NL-DE-S4C
IASMINEAVES
JASMINEAVES
1PSMMEAVES
1PSMINEAVES
JASMINEAVES
JASMINEAVES
JASMINEAVES
JASMINEAVES
lASMINEAVES
lASMINEAVES
10.SMINE AVE S
)RSMINE PVES
IASMiNE AVE 5
lASMINE AVE 5
JASMINEAVES
IASMINEAVES
lASMINEAVES
1HSMINEAVES
JASMINEAVES
93rdStree[S
93rtl5beM5
93tdSttee[S
93rd Sheet S
93M Stteet 5
lareau AvC $ (NOrth)
Jareau Avei(NOrth)
Jareau Avei(NOrth)
lareau AveS(Narth)
Jareau Ave S (NOrth)
lareauAVeS(Narth)
lareau AveS(Narch)
JareauAVeS(NOrth)
JareauAVeS�NOrth)
JareauAveS(NOrth)
Jareau Ave 5 (NOrth)
JareauAVeS(NOrth)
JareauAVeS(NOrth)
lareau FveS(NOrth)
Jareau AVeS(NOrth)
915tStteefS
91tt 5[reef 5
91rt 5[reel5
91rt 5[reef 5
91rt Stree! 5
91st Street 5
91rt5treet5
la5mineAVeS
JasmineAVeS
lasmineAVeS
JasmineAveS
lasmine Ave S
Oeatl End
OeadEnd
Oeatl EIId
DeadEnd
OeadEnd
DeadEnd
Dead End
DeadEnd
90th5treet5
90[h Stree[S
90th Street S
90[h Sttee[ 5
90th Street 5
90th 5[reet 5
90[h S[reefS
90fh 5[reet 5
90[h 5[reet S
90th 5[reet S
90[h Sheet S
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
Jareau Ave 5 (SOU[h)
Jareau AveS(Sou[h)
lareau Ave 5 (SOUth)
Jareau Ave 5 (SOUth)
lareau AveS(Seuth)
lare Ave S �SOUth)
Jareau Ave S (SOUth)
Jateau Ave$�SOUth)
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
JeffreyAVeS
JeHreyAVeS
leHreyAVeS
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
��
��
��
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
m
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
m
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
m
m
m
m
m
m
�
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��■
��
��
��■
��
��
��
��
��
� �
��
��■
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
-
-
m
. �
lASMINEAVES
lA SMINE AVE 5
JEEFERY AVE 5 NL-DESAC (2)
JEEFERY AVE 5 NL-�ESqC (2)
1 EEFERY AVE 5 NL-DE-SHC (2)
IEffERY AVE 5 CUL-0ESHC (3)
JEffEPY AVE S NL-�ESAC (1)
JEFiERY AVE 5 NL-DFSAC �1)
JEFFERVFVES
1EFFERYAVE 5
JEFFERYAVES
IEFFERYAVES
IEGFERYAVEi
JEFFERVAVES
IEFFERVAVE 5
IEFFEFYAVES
IEFFENVAVE 5
IEFFENY NVE 5
JEFFERYAVE 5
JEFFERVNVES
1EFFERYAVES
1EFFERYAVES
JEFFERYAVES
lEffEftYAVES
JEFFERYAVES
1EFFERVAVES
IEFFERVAVES
JEFFERVAVE 5
1EFFERVAVE 5
IEFFERY NVE 5
JEFFERYAVES
IEFFERYAVES
JEFFERYAVES
JEFFERYAVES
IEFFERYAVES
1EFFERYAVES -
JEFFERY BAY S
JEFFERY BAV S
JEFFERY COURT
IEFFE0.YCOURT
JEFFERYCOURT
JEFGERYCOURT
JENSENAVES
JENSEN AVE 5
JENSEN AVE 5
JENSENAVES
JENSENAVES
JENSEN HVE 5
1ENSEN AVE 5
1ENSEN AVE 5
JENSEN AVE 5
�m�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
"�
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
-'��
Q
�
�
�
�
�
�
0
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�"
�
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�I
�
�
�
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
: . � .:.._ �
----
��_-
_----
-- -_
�����
----
-
_-
�---
- -__
- ---
-- -
-----
--=--
-- -
-- -
�- -
- -
---
_
�
- ---
� ���
----=
- --
� �
, ---
----=
-� --
- --
-
-
JENSEN AVE 5
JENSENAVES
JENSENAVES �
1ENSEN AVES
IER6EN AVES
IEPGEN AVE 5
lERGEN AVES
JERGEN AVE 5
JERGEN AVE 5
IERGEN AVES
JERGEN AVE 5
IERGEN AVE 5
JERGEN AVE S NL DE SAC
JERGEN AVE 5 NL �E SAC
IERGEN AVE 5
IERGEN AVE 5
1ERGEN AVE 5
IERGENAVES '
1ERGEN AVE 5
JERGEN AVE 5
IERGEN AVE 5
1ERGEN AVES
JERGEN AVES
JERGEN AVE 5
JERGENAVES
JERGENqVEi
JERGEN AVES
JERGENAVES
JERGEN AVES
JERGENAVES
JER�ENHVES
JE0.6EN AVE S
JEPGENFVES
JERGENAVES
IEPGEN AVE S
)EflGEN BAYS
lERGEN BAYS
1EP6EN BAY 5
1ERGEN BAY S
JERGEN BAV 5
JERGENCOURTS
JEPGENCOURTS
JERGENCOURTS
JERGEN COURTS
JERGEN PlA[E 5
JERGEN PL10E 5
JE0.GEN PIACE 5
JERGEN PIqCE 5
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
1¢rgenAVeS
letgenAVeS
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
s�
��
��
��
��
s�
��
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
0
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
'�'
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
m
�
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
�
--- -
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
��
� �
----
----
-�a-
� ��� �
--- II
---
----
---
-�--
�---
----
�-_-
----
---�
---�
---�
----
-----
---��
�m��m�
-----
--- -
----
���� �
- -
���
--
---�-
� ���
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Appendix H
Milling Test Areas
In order to evaluate the feasibility of a mill-overlay, twelve test areas were milled to a depth of
approximately 2-inches. These test strips were approximately 7.5-feet wide and 25-feet long. The
purpose of the test strips was to determine the quantity and severity of cracking below the pavement
surface.
Pictures are included for each mill area, prior to and after milling.
Cottage
J Grove
� Pride and4rosp�r�ty Meet
>, _ _ .
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
- - x a
> �.
.� �,�-'
- .. , , .
�' � ... _. .. . ... - .c_. . - .
k �
. � � _._ , r �.
� � � �
{. � { j
� � {
�
��- - ;• � .:A
� ; � ,3
`'� z �
t e ��� � / ..��
___. _� I �, , _. __ ... ..� L ... _ � ..,. _£.�� .�. �. , _..i ... _ �_,._. .?Y�
� .. ... .... . .. . ... . . . ... ..
N'
i
t . . �. � � ,� '
j � . . t � -.. :
`Y � �
. a . .� � : � =�:
� . . � . . ' ' �.�� t 2i i .. �
. . _ �. ' . . 1� _ Y�[� � --: �.�.
� � � . 7 � ' �
K . 5 � , ' . „ ' i � `.` �� - 4 >:.
� , � �.�. � �, '` �FS"w
.
. .
. � .5�`. . � y
�.._ -�_ _ _ _ ._. -. '- � '— — -'n_- . —..�:� `"�' ?�`• ' ' �
Pavement ccacicing pattein more evident after milling, potential for reflective cracking.
f _ . _ . _. . .__ . . . __ ...
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project
Area A
Approximate Location: 9044 Jergen Avenue
�:. . . . �' . .
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Area B
Approximate Location: 9334 93`d Street
�"�-- : -:� =-
� ...., �:.. -A..._�-�...�
,-
r - ` , �,
� _ - : �;
� . _ ;�_.
; �
` ��,.� -
�'"
�;:�'-��
k''
�. ,, . ,
,
�.�
��
�
.�.� �``''`
=�� {
�, � �,��,-����.
'�
.�-�:�:_ _ � ,
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project
Pavement stripping extends down into the bituminous base.
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Area C
�
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project
Pavement stripping extends down into the bituminous base.
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Area D
Approximate Location: 9138 92"d Street
�? � ��_ - „�� �;w -�
��
#.. : , . .
� . . .
. .: .
: . _ . ; ,c�,
�
� �'.� �';� � �� ���;• -�.�;-
��� r
�•� a .,,. -
� :,� . -�¢, � :
� . ��` S 'G�l� �
� �
4 . y { , _ �
�'� `�• ��,,,--
r . .._ — _
� �.
t _ �` ,�. � _
_� — � _
- _ ---� �
=: � - _ -
_ _ L 1 3 �
, _ �_" ,�
r �' �
� i � � 4 r ` , "i
� a e
,.. > > W ,_ .�t._ ... , .,... . ,_s.. __ _,. , .,_ '�..L -- —
..�
£ �� t
- � :
���
i.,
r� -
w - _ �
I��
�a
_ ___
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project
� m -,�--- � .
Mill exposes gravel base due to thin pavement layer.
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
�...�
' ` �'
�::
_ ..�_Y;,'-�
" �
, �
.� .._� Pb rt ,
��4 �� ' _
�� ` E
S
' ��' •a`
- k r�� �. F
; :,� - °�,;�
: i i
� h
l e
E '
r . t i ..
V ' l t , .r I �
. . _ J._.. a_ _� li.�' _ d. � t � } .����"a
'JT.: !
` � M1
.:MI - ��}� �� J
'a4. _ . . �' /� ^n.Y ..
v, . �
�
� + . i' 7/1G�
�� � � .�1
r"' `�
t ;
�
e�" �y, .. . '�.
r '� r �i
i .. . �� $t`�_ .. � . �
'✓`�,' . � � I � j '. s 7 � i
°�� /� � i� �.., � '� . .
�! i ];
, ��f i..yrf�y�/�' � � /� �' I �#� � ��� � � .
�F1 4 1 �' . 1, �� ,e� �I � 'F�'�'��� ',r'
� �' � � . . - . - I
� � F ,� i. �. � . , , t
�� ,F � ��� ��... . ''{ . � :
t +`�'� y'
' f :" t`' i
/`-0 , ���{ �� r �
,. �, �-�� ��?' ; , �,''{ �.!
r
�`�'� c � � i � t �'.� 'G � �!� � {� , . e f , -` �.$. , . &� i �. I
r
.
� �.
_i .._ft : . . . � �'��
� 'd"` , ..�: _r�k .! _���:ca � � : �
__��_ .�. ._.__ : •. � .: _ . _ {
Majority of pavement sh�ipping removed, some transverse and longitudinal cracks exposed.
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project
Area E
Approximate Location: 9096 Janie Avenue
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
_' _
..._. : _.,' '_ .. ... - .... . . ::i
_- .._ u .... . �. _ .. .
4..,_ �.: ....._ . _- . . . . _
�;' , � _� y., _ . - �
R ia,w:�i�'�"e�".'.--" .
-� �� _ .. ..co.s4
L
'�
; � . . _ . � �.a;:"�
,•�
F .�. � - x .:� Y � � ' . . ..�I
'�. ^S
�� . ' . . .,. .- - t
F} _
�et�, `� . � �
a :.. �. . . . �ii . . . . .. .. ,
'�}
.:: Utly �?7�
. -
� � ��� °u . � M, �
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project
Area F
Approximate Location: 9019 Jasmine Avenue
,_�,E___'1�.�7��i'�T`-iliF".� .. -,..._... 4 ....
Transverse cracking and joint repair required.
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
-'�
. _ . . ' _..�0.
. � - y2 � `}�.
r '
} �j. �v
i j
_ - f ' �
..: s k � k ��
� T i .;�
,.. t - 1 �
e ,� ���,
r �
./ . . r � 1' i' b! . _
Np� � � � :.� 7 6 )
�i::..a::.�i� __�,.._. � �� y'�.
f..�,., _ °
L
: � a - a'�' * k ` �
, }, ` 7 - .,, '
� i--G ` " � �:.
p � ��� ;, t .
�' �
•:.° "r_. d e i �' r
��- � �� / r ! ,�
„ ,t
w.�s y r f 1 .'t
f
r .,� 1 ! E .� '�_
f . .. . .a ._ r. . .
f .'�.; t �'.-��� �'�?:,V '��i
'YL; �- _ _ I
1' �'
'.T .` r+.��-� ,
� y i# "
.-:?�r'.. �_'.
4 . S�g y ��.:.
�'.
� �
' . � ��.
� W Va: �.`.���
+. �f P.`�
�
t , � �Y
r t ' � .
t7,"6 ^�`� �' y �IA
"� � . i � " � �� yi1
'�� ti ' �_ . �G'ti
�:
\
t
i
�_
Majority of pavement sn•ipping removed, thermal crack present but base in good condition.
i __. _ _.._ ___.._._ ____ _ _
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project
Area G
Approximate Location: 9235 Jeffery Avenue
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Area H
Approximate Location: 9295 Jergen Aveune
�-,— --- ---- -.,
e �- �
�`� � ��� �' .
;,:�'- � ; .
�.:�,r y ' -.,+= - � . ' '
3s^ai^
�`' � _ -
��
� -
i ":�� . ." ' _ '
i' "
i . � �- ' ♦ � S'
F •f ._ J ' . t i _
, : ; ; , ... . � � _ w, �
�
� �' . :- ' 'l- :
I - 4. _
x �
/ ' }'
C - ,.. . , r . . ... , . ... _ . . _ ; . . . _ � ._ - . . �.
d
�. .� ,��._. __. . ._ _ . _ .o_ _. __. � _ . . �__.. .._ . . . .�. __� i ___ _ _. �* I
r F �����
`� � .
(�. x � a.. . .. � �� r �. � .._ � � a , y I
.�
I . . .. . � ' " .» L..t$"
,�. _ �
G - - ��
� � . � . . . . . . . .
.:�
� �''�:'' . ;,�` �. -
� ' , �� �
� �, ..
_ �, . .
y ,__ : T , -
:� _ � y.
. �- �_�__.
' ' .i � ._ . .:- • a , !
- :�
.. ,
vv� f �
€ �
bi.w"�.... +�'!�' € s l � �. .._ �#�� �
�; 1 ;;,,,: Y� �� , ,�
i � �� �� ''i
� � :� ' �
�,. �' . �., yt.. �.., ,��..
. ,�.- .a�
� :' � . � , i
�
�
� `` , a `�^?'. �
t- :
: �, � w�; ,''j
� .
�4� " . ,
� *�� *��, � . �
� � . � ���
s N�- ti . �, �,�-:� +. {
h �. � �� � � 't L ' ~ ''�•
4
.
�. ! , E
. 1 �� � � L � . , , , � .
. x .�-..a�_- . " . _ _ �_'__'__._ _..., . �i�_.�_.�_S�-.�*...�_ - -
Milling surface reveals cracks in bituminous base, illustrates volume of potential reflective cracking.
� .z:� � �,�'
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Area I
Approximate Location: 9189 Jergen Aveune
', ��r.�r�s• ,:: �-�� i
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project
Normal thermal cracicing present.
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Area J
Location: 9328 Jarrod Avenue
'g-z -,F, ,,��
� � - , "�
, . _ , _ , �` __ � .�..
� � ;_ _, ;.
� �� - , �.�...�„��_ ';
-_.� � �-.
- �....� _ ��r„.
..�; ..
�-�; . �� � :_ �
.
_ �
,_ - _ _ . .> . _ ._.
_ _ _,, _
,. -, , . - w �,
- - _ _,
,� _ _ _
.: �.:. _ _:
_ .r:
- r :,' 1 � . ._ . � . .. '. � �:
� .,�.:: .. •. �, .
�_
� ;... :� . � r - � , - . `:;
�J'
',�, ��� � : ;�
-��- - *",: �
�++. -y. .
_ � '-.., �
- _ - _ - _ - -:.j
,-�. . . _, . . _ .
} ._ .� ,-. ... ._ .
. _ . . . . _4 . _r
;�.. , - .- , , . .. �.��
. .s_. ?' " ' ���
r' ., ^�.�.' y+.` ..� I
_ .� �.- - � �"' � �; �1
f � `` � _' J
6G�" ; . . � � � . . . . � . . � } ' _ Y _ ' _ ' - .. .' 1
t � � . ` �..��.. .� .
� � � •
� f . . �^',
��.ii�
.� . . _ � j
A � �� A �`:
F�
��
4i ~4
�*
� °�°P.
.,A . '..�
t
Some pavement holding moisture, patchy asphalt stripping in bituminous base present.
� � � „=- _ _ _ _ _
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Area K
Approximate Location: 9433 Jareau Avenue
�: -. � =' s
�_:
�, � � -
, :.,�
i �� �3„„';:. _
_ F �`',{ _ . _ -_
S�Y�' � 1
�}.�P _ .. :
- ..Y`� - ' , . "
��' { _
' �_ _ . .. . ,.
�
� nFA
!
_ � ._�y i... _ . , �
:3�1
� .''
�
� r
z t
. _ , . F
i?�
� !�
i
��,� y
� 1
��`� �'. � —
;t :ns, �`� t:
. s zV - \
c- "�i r � � _
TM� <
��..� - ,��.� C
�`�:< i : � '�i
3 � � � S \ F 4 �n :4
. �� , . . `�l,�t�;i _ . _ � . . I . _ . , e'.'_'�`i ,... . . ,
I�k.��'r'''� . _ '
{
4 '�
."�.—� . ..,�:i
I
i
� � � - qyR',": .
�y
#- ,
, _�
. � q�y._
' , �:
F°
_ �.. �
,S ' S.
} t
4 �_ �
, , - .;g - p
$`+ ' ,
. � � �. ��d+.� . _
ii:
. . .. . . � m- � ..
r��i
. �-
�,..�� .. � `. .
Pavement stripping extends down into the bituminous base, weak pavement noted in areas of stripping.
, _---____._..__ _
�
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
� . '-� - ��.`r'�`:�.��
- _ =�
i : : �;��
� `; ,� _ �, -
, ;,� <;�.
, � _ _
G. - �
4 ;� _ s �„ �
� � � �+`.�^-�" �' ` ,� �*°»
_ k
- : �' � ,t
tat , �
'� �.� ;: : �"�' � ' - �� ° �
,-� � � � � , -� � ' '' _ ,��� , `
.
� ,. �
, 4
;_
�"�` _ .�.. .,.�. °_...�,-,. � � � � ��� �
1:�,� i� �: . � t ,.. + _�� � �� g � ��''
�'.1 F �a+� i� ,. <.� � _. �'� � ; .�� ��
"f� t'� t � �� . � ,�.
Ea �
Y
.+.� r ` � �, "� c L
��� �'� �..r � f• R ,,�, '� ��+e���) � i "' c .. *. Y �; �{ � ,�� i � , � ' .
�Y;- �� �� � � #�
`�. { 2 l � �
I � , .S�„'r-� Z
��_� — � —�—. _�_ ,..�_ �____ �
Paveme�t stripping extends down into the bituminous base.
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
2014 Pavement Management Project
Area L
Approximate Location: 9415 Jeffery Avenue