HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-01-15 PACKET 06.A.REQUEST OF CITY COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL AGENDA
MEETING ITEM # �
DATE 1/15/14 • .
PREPARED BY: Community Development Jennifer Levitt
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT STAFF AUTHOR
******:�**:�*******�**********��***************�**
COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST
1. Hold the public hearing for the 2014 Pavement Management Project, Districts F1 and F4.
2. Consider ordering the project.
3. Consider authorizing the preparation of plans and specifications.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
1. Hold the public hearing for the 2014 Pavement Management Project, Districts F1 and F4.
2. Adopt the resolution ordering the 2014 Pavement Management Project, Districts F1 and F4
and authorizing the preparation of plans and specifications.
BUDGET IMPLICATION $ $
BUDGETED AMOUNT ACTUAL AMOUNT FUNDING SOURCE
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
� MEMO/LETTER:Memo from Jennifer Levitt dated 1/9/14
� RESOLUTION: Draft
❑ ORDINANCE:
❑ ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION:
❑ LEGAL RECOMMENDATION:
� OTHER: Feasibility Report, Special Benefit Appraisals
ADMINISTRATOR'S COMMENTS
l ,-
/
- City Administrator Date
******��*************�*�******�*******��*�******
COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: ❑ APPROVED ❑ DENIED ❑ OTHER
Cottage
„� Grove
� Pride ana PrOSpet�ty Meet
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Ryan Schroeder, City Administrator
From: Jennifer M. Levitt, P.E., City Engineer
Date: January 9, 2014
Re: 2014 Pavement Management, District F1 & F4
1. Hold Public Hearing
2. Qrder Project
3. Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specifications
�
Backqround
On September 4, 2013 the City Council authorized a feasibility report for the Pavement Man-
agement Area as outlined in the Capital Improvement Plan for two areas: 1) Area bound by
south of 90th Street, east of Islay Avenue, north of Jareau Avenue, west of Jewel Avenue
(Di�trict F1); 2) Area east of and including Jergen Avenue, west of and including Jareau Ave-
nue, south of 91 st Street and 93rd Street (a portion of District F4). The City Council held a
workshop session on November 20, 2013 to discuss the various elements of the proposed im-
provements. At the workshop, staff presented the preliminary findings of several different tests
that were completed on the existing pavement, sub-grade, and utilities. Due to the poor pave-
ment condition, along with good sub-grade soils and curb condition, a full pavement replace-
ment and spot curb replacement was recommended for both areas.
A neighborhood meeting for this project was held on December 12, 2013, at 7:00 p.m. at
Cottage Grove Middle School. There were 20 people in attendance.
On December 18, 2013 the City Council approved the feasibility report and called for a public
hearing to be held on January 15, 2014. All notices and publications have been completed
according to State Statute.
Discussion
Summary of Road and Infrastructure Improvements
Road Rehabilitation: Full Road Reconstruction
The rehabilitation method proposed for the streets in District F1 and District F4 is to remove
the existing asphalt surFace and replace it with a new surface, which will consist of two lifts of
bituminous. Only spot curb replacement will be included as part of this project. Also proposed
are some minor utility improvements for sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer, and street lights.
The potential assessment for the improvements listed above is estimated at $3,100 per resi-
dential lot.
Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Ryan Schroeder
2014 Pavement Management, District F1 & F4
January 9, 2014
Page 2 of 3
Project Funding Analysis
The total project cost for the road work, utility, storm sewer, and street light improvements is
$3,636,313. According to the City's policy, 45 percent of the total project cost for road work
and utilities is assessed against the benefiting properties. The total project value that is as-
sessed residentially is $1,555,239 for the Districts F1 and F4. The Cost Estimate Summary
can be viewed in Appendix C of the Feasibility Report. Staff anticipates the issuance of $3
million in G.O. Improvement (section 429) bonds to finance the 2014 PM Project. Such an is-
suance would result in an estimated increase to the annual tax levy of 0.9 percent beginning in
2015.
A special benefit appraisal was ordered for properties within the F1 and F4 Districts. There
was found to be a special benefit ranging from $4,100 to $5,000 per property for full pavement
replacement, which is greater than the proposed assessment for the residential lots.
Project Option Discussion
Option #1: Order the project as outlined in the feasibility report for Districts F1 and F4.
The benefit of proceeding with the project is that project costs are stable and a good bidding
environment exists, which reduces the burden to the general tax payers and the residents ad-
jacent to the project who are paying assessments. Another result of the new pavement is re-
duced maintenance costs associated with the streets in the project area. Those maintenance
dollars and resources can then be reallocated to other parts of the community, which is a
greater benefit to the general taxpayer. There are also similar benefits related to the repairs to
the utilities in the project area.
The CIP outlines a fiscally responsible plan to rehabilitate roads and utilities within the com-
munity. By ordering the project, those plans stay true that document and the Council's direction
given in the development of the CIP.
Option #2; Do not order the project as outlined in the feasibility report for Districts F1 and F4.
If District F1 and F4 improvements are not ordered, the roads will continue to deteriorate which
will result in increased maintenance cost. Those costs are borne by all taxpayers, not just the
property owners that live on those streets. As with any delayed project, there are increased
costs related to commodities, labor, and economic conditions, which all relate to the construc-
tion index. The end result is a typical increase of 2.5 percent to 8 percent annually for the
project. When a pavement management project is delayed, it creates a domino effect by de-
laying all future pavement management projects. The cost of the domino effect is hard to cap-
ture, since there are pavement management projects planned each year into the future. The
City's approach since 1994 has been to ensure a safe condition and preserve the structural
integrity of roads in a fiscally responsible manner. Independent third party benefit appraisals
conducted since 2007 have concluded that this program improves property values within the
project areas, as compared to the existing deteriorated condition.
Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Ryan Schroeder
2014 Pavement Management, District F1 & F4
January 9, 2014
Page 3 of 3
It should be noted to Council per Minnesota State Statute 429,031 that the resolution
must be adopted by four-fifths vote for the project to be ordered and the project to
proceed.
Recommendation
It is recommended the City Council adopt a resolution ordering the project and authorize
preparation of plans and specifications for the 2014 Pavement Management Project Districts
F1 and F4.
RESOLUTION NO. 2014-XXX
A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING
PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROJECT, DISTRICTS F1 AND F4
WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted on December 18, 2013, fixed a
date for the Council to hold a public hearing, pursuant to Minn. Stat. Chapter 429.011 to
429.111, on the proposed improvement benefitting properties that include:
District F1:
1. 91st Street S. from IslayAvenue S. to Jareau Avenue S.
2. 91 st Street S. from 91 st Street S. to cul-de-sac (8802-8856)
3. 91 st Street S. from 91 st Street S. to cul-de-sac (8862-8900)
4. Janie Avenue S. from 90th Street S. to 91st Street S.
5. Janero Avenue S. from 90th Street S. to 91 st Street S.
6. Jareau Avenue S. from 90th Street S. to 91 st Street S.
7. Jareau Avenue S. from Jareau Avenue S. to cul-de-sac (9021-9069)
8. Jareau Avenue S. from 91 st Street S. to 91 st Street S.
9. 91 st Street S. from Jareau Avenue S. to Jeffery Avenue S.
10. Jasmine Avenue S. from 90th Street S. to 91st Street S.
11. Jasmine Court S. from Jasmine Avenue S. to cul-de-sac (9002-9018)
12. Jasmine Avenue S. from Jasmine Avenue S. to cul-de-sac (9047-9085)
13. Jasmine Avenue S. from 91st Street S. to cul-de-sac (9103-9140)
14. Jarvis Avenue S. from 91 st Street S. to 92nd Street S.
15. 92nd Street S. from Jarvis Avenue S. to Jeffery Avenue S.
16. Jeffery Avenue S. from 90th Street S. to 93rd Street S.
17. Jeffery Avenue S. from Jeffery Avenue S. to cul-de-sac (9029-9069)
18. Jeffery Avenue S. from Jeffery Avenue S. to cul-de-sac (9103-9153)
19. Jeffery Avenue S. from Jeffery Avenue S. to cul-de-sac (9203-9227)
20. Jeffery Court from Jeffery Avenue S. to cul-de-sac.
21. 93rd Street S. from Jeffery Avenue S. to Jergen Avenue S.
22. Jergen Avenue S. from 93rd Street S. to Jergen Bay S.
23. 92nd Street S. from Jergen Avenue S. to cul-de-sac
24. Jergen Court from Jergen Avenue S. to cul-de-sac
25. Jergen Bay from Jergen Avenue S. to cul-de-sac
26. Jergen Avenue S. from 90th Street S. to Jergen Bay S.
27. Jergen Avenue from Jergen Avenue S. to cul-de-sac (9061-9083)
28. Jensen Avenue S. from 90th Street S. to Jeffery Avenue S.
District F4:
1. Jareau Avenue S. from to 91 st Street S. to dead end (9499)
2. Jarrod Avenue S. loop from Jareau Avenue S. to Jareau Avenue S.
3. Jarrod Avenue S. from Jarrod Avenue S. to cul-de-sac (9337-9473)
4. 93rd Street S. from Jareau Avenue �. to Jasmine Avenue S.
5. Jasmine Avenue S. from Jeffery Avenue S. to cul-de-sac
6. Jeffery Bay S. from Jeffery Avenue S. to cul-de-sac
Resolution No. 2014-XXX
Page 2 of 2
.
ti
Jeffery Avenue S. from 93rd Street S. to cul-de-sac
Jergen Avenue S. from 93rd Street S. to dead end (9495)
Jergen Place S. from Jergen Avenue S. to cul-de-sac
WHEREAS, ten days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the hearing was
given, and the hearing was held, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an
opportunity to be heard thereon; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to assess the cost of said improvements to all benefited
properties.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove,
County of Washington, State of Minnesota:
1. Such improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible as detailed in the feasi-
bility report. The improvement shall include road rehabilitation, water, storm sewer,
sanitary sewer, and street lights.
2. Such improvement is hereby ordered.
3. Bolton and Menk, Inc. is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement.
The engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such
improvement.
4. The City Council declares its official intent to reimburse itself for the costs of the
improvement from the proceeds of the tax exempt bond.
Passed this 15th day of January 2014.
Myron Bailey, Mayor
Attest:
Caron M. Stransky, City Clerk
� � � '" � ` �
Cottage
Grove
� Pride and PrOSPerity Meet
Feasibility Report
for
2014 Pavement Management Project
City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota
Decem ber 2013
Project Number N15.106799
-� BCaLTC�N � I\/I � N I►C , I N�
. Gonsulti�ng Engineers & Surveyors
" 2035 Gounty Road Q East • Suite B• Maplewood, MN 55109-5314
Phone (651) 704-9970 • Fax (659 ) 704-9971
www. boltn n-men k.com
December 18, 2013
Honorable Ma�-or �uid Citv Council
Citv of Cottage Grove
12800 Ravine Parl��-a�- South
Cottage Grove, MN �5016
RE: 2014 Paveinent Manageinent Project
BMI Project No. N 15.106799
Honorable Ma�-or and Cit�- Council Meinbers,
Enclosed for �-our revie�� is the 201� Pavemeirt Management Project Feasibility� Report. The project scope
includes street rehabilitation and utilit�- repairs ���ithui paveinent district F 1 1nd a portion of F4, as
identified i�i this report.
This report describes the iinproveinents necessai «ithin the project area. Cost estimates for the proposed
i�nprovements are presented in the Report.
We ���ould be happ�T to discuss this report at �-our convenience. Please contact ine at 6� 1-968-7674 if �-ou
have an�T questions.
Suicerel�-,
BOLTON & MENK,INC.
�� �
Milce Boei, PE
flESIGNIPIG FOR A BEFT�ER TC�MC;RROW
Bolt�� & Menk is an equal opportunity employer
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
FEASIBILITY REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents ........................................
Certific�tion ................................................
Introdu cti on . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ezisting Conditions — DiscU�icts Fl & F4.....
Streets ...................................................
Sanitai� Se«er ......................................
Water Main ...........................................
St011ri Se�� el .........................................
Proposed Improvements — Districts F 1& F�
Streets ...................................................
Sanitai� Se«er ......................................
WaterMain ...........................................
Storin er .........................................
Storin Water Qualit� . .............................
Proposed linproveinents — Trail ...................
Permits and Easeinents ................................
Estiinated Costs ...........................................
Cost Allocation .....................................
Financing..............................................
Public Hearing .............................................
Project Schedule ..........................................
Conclusion And Recoimnendations .............
Cin of Cottage Grove, Miiuiesota
201-� Pa� ement Management Project
i
ii
1
2
2
J
J
�
�
�
6
6
6
6
6
7
7
7
8
9
9
9
Table of Contents
Page i
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
APPENDIX
Appendiz A— Ezisting Pavement Condition Photos
Appendiz B — Figures
Figure 1 — Location Map
Figure 2— Streets - Year Constn�cted
Figure 3— Paveinent Condition Rating
Figure 4 — Proposed Improveinents
Figure 5 — Utilit�- Rep�irs
Figure 6 — Assessable Parcels
Appendii C— Cost Estimate Slunmar�-
Appendiz D— Preliminai Assessment Roll
Appendiz E —Pavement Condition Oveivie«�
Appendis F —Paveinent Cores
Appendi� G —Falling Weight Deflectoineter
Appendiz H —Milluig Test Areas
CERTIFICATION
I hereb�r certifi� that this plan, specification, or report ��as
prepared b�- ine or under in�- duect supervision, and that I
ain a dulv Licensed Professional Engineer under the la���s
of the State of Minnesota.
B�r: �"�" �
Michael J. Boei. P.E.
License No. 44�76
Bolton & Menlc, Inc.
Date: Deceinber 18, 2013
Cin� of Cottage Grove, Miiuiesota Certification
201-� Pa� ement Management Project Page ii
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
INTRODUCTION
The Herita�e Estates Addition, Rid�e«�ood l�` through 7` Additions, and the Knoll���ood ls through 3'`�
Additions have been identified �s candidates for rehabilitltion during the 2014 construction season �s a
part of the Cit�- of Cottage Grove's ongoing road�ia�- rehabilitation prograin. The Cit�- Council authorized
preparation of this Report to determine the feasibilit�- of rehabilitatinb those streets as a part of t11e 2014
Pavement Manageinent Project.
These residential neighborhoods a�e located east of Jamaica Avenue and south of 90` Street and are part
of PaVeinent Mana�einent District F 1 and a portion of F4, as sho«n on Figure 1 located in Appendii A.
There are thirt�r-seven residential streets ��ithin these neighborhoods totaling approiiinatel�- 26,000 lineal
feet.
The purpose of this report is to fi�rther ev�lu�te the �vorlc required for this street rehabilit�tion project, to
provide an estimate of cost, and to establish a inethod of cost allocation or assessinent in order to
determine the ph�rsical and economic feasibility.
This feasibilit�- report eiainines the follo�� ing street seginents:
District F 1:
1. 91s Street So. from Isla�T Avenue So. to Jareau Avenue So.
9.
10
11
12
13
14
1�
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
2�
26
27
28
91� Sh So. from 91� Street So. to cul-de-sac (8802-88�6)
91� Street So. from 91� Street So. to cul-de-sac (8862-8900)
Jane Avenue So. from 90` Street So. to 91S` Street So.
Janero Avenue So. from 90` Street So. to 91�` Street So.
Jareau A�enue So. from 90"' Street So. to 91s` Street So.
Jareau Avenue So. froin Jareau Avenue So. to cul-de-sac (9021-9069)
Jareau Avenue So. from 91�` Street So. to 91s` Street So.
91S` Street So. fi Jareau Avenue So. to Jeffer�� Avenue So.
Jasinine Avenue So. froin 90"' Street So. to 91�` Street So.
Jasinine Court So. froin Jasinine Avenue So. to cul-de-sac (9002-9018)
Jasinine Avenue So. froin Jasinine Avenue So. to cul-de-sac (9047-908�)
Jasinine Avenue So. fi 91�` Street So. to cul-de-sac (9103-9140)
Jaivis Avenue So. fi 91�` Street So. to 92"`� Street So.
92"� Street So. froin Jaivis Avenue So. to Jeffer�- Avenue So.
Jeffei�r Avenue So. froin 90"' Street So. to 93'� St�eet So.
Jeffeiy Avenue So. fi Jeffer�- Avenue So. to cul-de-sac (9029-9069)
Jeffeiy Avenue So. froin Jeffer�- Avenue So. to cul-de-sac (9103-91�3)
Jeffei�T Avenue So. fi Jeffer�- Avenue So. to cul-de-sac (9203-9227)
Jeffei Court fi Jeffei�- Avenue So. to cul-de-sac.
93`� Street So. fi Jefferv Avenue So. to Jer�en Avenue So.
Jergen Avenue So. from 93'`� Street So. to Jergen Ba�- So.
92"`� Street So. fi Jergen Avenue So. to cul-de-sac
Jergen Court from Jergen Avenue So. to cul-de-sac
Jer�en Ba�- from Jergen Avenl�e So. to cul-de-sac
Jerben Avenue So. froin 90 Street So. to Jergen Ba�- So.
Jergen Avenue from Jergen Avenue So. to cul-de-sac (9061-9083)
Jensen Avenue So. from 90"' Street So. to Jeffei�r Avenue So.
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project Page 1
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
��st���t F�:
1. Jareau Avenue So. froin to 91� Street So. to dead end (9499)
2. Jarrod Avenue So. loop fi Jareau Avenue So. to Jareau Avenue So.
3. Jarrod Avenue So. fi Jarrod Avenue So. to cul-de-sac (9337-9�73)
�. 93r`� Street So. fi J1re1u Avenue So. to Jasinine Avenue So.
�. Jasinine Avenue So. fi Jeffei Avenue So. to cul-de-sac
6. Jeffen- Ba�- So. from Jeffer�� Avenue So. to cul-de-sac
7. Jeffei�- Avenue So. from 93'`� Street So. to cul-de-sac
8. Jergen Avenue So. fi 93r`' Street So. to deld end (9495)
9. Jergen Place So. from Jergen Avenue So. to cul-de-sac
EXISTING CONDITIONS — DISCTRICTS F1 & F4
STREETS
The streets ���ithi�i District F1 and F�4 are urban-residential and �vere originall�- constructed in the late
1980's and early 1990's. The eiceptions are the Ridge��ood 1�` Addition (1979) and Ridge��ood 7`
Addition (1997). Generall�-. the streets 1re 32 feet �tiide (froin face of curb to face of curb) �tiith concrete
curb a�id gutter. Prior to the Wal-Mart developinent, Jeffeiy Avenue had been classif�ied as a collector
road��av bet�veen 90 Street and its soi�thernmost stub ��ith the intent that it �vould be eitended in the
future. As a part of the Wal-Mart project, a permanent cul-de-sac �vas constn�cted on the southern plat
line of Rid�e��-ood � Adclition and the collector classif�ication effectivel�T removed. This former collector
street is approiimatel�- 44 feet ��-ide (from face of curb to flce of curb) «-ith concrete curb and gutter.
A visual inspection ��-as performed in 2013 to evaluate paveinent surface conditions. The uispection
determined the paveinent rating of these streets �enerall� range froin 50-60. Paveinents in the lo�ver end
of that ran�e are considered f�i� and generall�T have inajor distress. In contrast. the 1994 Paveinent
Management Plan depicted PCI's (PaVement Condition Indei) in the range of 7�-100. Per that plan,
PCI's in those ranges are classified as "Vei Good" to "Eicellent". Since 199�, paveinent condition has
continued to deteriorate and inuch of the pa�ements have distress and are "Fair". Figure 2 depicts the age
of the streets ��ithin the neighborhood and Figure 3 depicts the visual paVement rating for each street
seginent. In addition, there are sections of eiisting curb and gutter that have settled, craciced, or have
other defects that ��i11 requue replacement. Appendii A contains some representative photos of the
eiistinb paveinent condition.
It should be noted that the visual surface rating is a preli�ninai�T indicator of condition and potential
rehabilitation techniques; it shoi�ld not automatically dictate the final maintenance or rehabilitation.
Factors such as traff�ic projections, paveinent strength, and pa�einent structure condition should also be
considered.
PAVEMENT CORES
Coring of the paveinent ��as peiforined to deterinuie the tl�ickness of the e�istuig street section and
evaluate plvement condition. From the cores, it can be seen that the average section consists of 3-4
inches of bitumi�ious over 7-8 inches of gravel.
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project Page 2
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Existing Street Section
No. Location Bituminous (in) Aggregate Base (in) Condition
1 88�9 91�` Street 4'� 6" '� (Upper 1.�")
2 9099 Janero Avenue 32S' 6.S' Good
3 9088 Jareau Avenue 3.75' 10.5' *(Upper 2")
4 9019 Jasinine Aveni�e 4.S' 8" Good
5 9022 Jeffei�- Avenue �2S' T' *(Entire depth, brolcen)
6 9063 Jensen Avenue 3.75' 1025' Good
7 9044 Jergen Avenue 3" 8" Good
8 91�0 Jaivis Avenue 3.75' 8" *(Upper 2")
9 91�4 Jeffei Avenue 4.5" 9" *(Upper 2'')
10 9128 Jergen Court 3.75' S.S' Good
11 9279 Jergen Avenue 32S' 7.75" *(Entire deptli, brolcen)
12 9247 Jeffeiy Avenue 3.75' 8" '"(Upper 2.S')
13 9334 93r� Street 32S' 7.S' *(Entue depth, brolcen)
14 9�44 93r`' Street 32S' 62S' *(Upper 2")
1� 9116 Jergen Ba�- ; �j�� 6 75�� Good
16 9487 92"`� Street � *(Bottoin 1")
2.�8" 7.13
17 9337 Jeffeiy Court 4.00" 6.00" '� (Entire depth, brolcen)
18 9170 Jareau Avenue ; 1;� g gg�� *(Entire depth)
19 9411 Jareau Avenue ; Zj�� � Zj�� *(Entire depth, brolcen)
20 9340 Jarrod Avenue ;.00" 9.00" *(Upper LS')
21 9373 Jasinine Avenue ;.50" 8.00" *(Upper 2'�, brolcen)
22 9426 Jeffei�r Avenue ; 1;°� �;g�� *(Entire depth, brolcen)
23 9�48 Jergen Place 42S' 625" *(Entire depth)
24 9338 Jergen Avenue ; �p�� � jp Good
Ai�erccge 3.58" 7.60"
* Asphalt stripping obseived (vai severit�-), depths noted.
Seventeen of the t�vent�--four cores displa�-ed degradation due to stripping, «�hich is �enerally� described
as the separation of aggregate fi the �sphalt due to inoisture. The strippuig found degrades the strength
and durabilit� of the paVement. Seven of the cores ���ere noted as broken, meaning the stripping �� as
severe enough that the top la�-er of bituini�ious fell apa� as the core ��as eitracted. The locations of
stripping coincided �tiith areas ��-here Public Works has perfonned eitensive maintenance via teinporai
overla�-s and patclung. The stripping appears to occur i�i irregular patterns. ho�vever it appears to be inost
severe in the paveinent of the 1990's. Pictures of t��o paveinent cores cau be seen in Appendii F.
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project Page 3
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
ADDITIONAL TESTING
Due to the results of the cores and previous maintenance e�pended. the Cit�- decided to peiform additional
testing of the paveinent to evaluate strength and condition of the pavement structure. T�vo additional
testing methods ��-ere performed:
1. Falling Weight Deflectoineter (FWD)
2. Millin� of test strips
The falling ��eight deflectometer (FWD) is a non-desUuctive process used to evaluate pavement structural
condition b}T providuig an in-situ characterization of the paveinent la�-er stiffiiess. The FWD applies
d�-nainic loads to a pavement surface, simulating the ma�nitude and duration of a single ���heel load. The
do��-n�vard inoveinent (vertical deflection) of the p�veinent at various dist�uices froin the loaduig plate are
ineasured ���ith various sensors. These ineasurements help determine the overall paveinent load rating.
pavement layer characteristics and material properties (modulus), and subgrade strengtl� characteristics
(in-situ R-value). Detailed FWD results are listed in Appendi� G.
Milling of test strips �vas perforined in order to evaluate the feasibilit�- of � inill-overla�-. T�velve test
areas �vere inilled to a depth of approiimatelv 2-inches. These test strips «ere appro�natel�- 7.5-feet
���ide and 2� to �0-feet long. The purpose of the test strips ���as to detennuie the qu�ntit�- and severit�- of
cracl�ing belo«- the paveinent suiface and visuall�- evaluate the underl�ring paveinent condition. Idea11�-,
inilling the surface paveinent ��i11 reinove surface distress and reduce both the nuinber and severit�- of
cracics ui the remaining paveinent, reducing the need for joint repair and sl�bsequent reflective cracicing.
Pictures of the test inill strips are located in Appendii H.
ADDITIONAL TESTING SUMMARY
The FWD testing provides a paveinent stiffness quantified as a modulus. With a fe��- eiceptions, the
inodl�lus of the bituminous la�-ers intact (and «ithout stripping) �� inuch hi�her than those �vith severe
stripping. Ho« ever, due to the sand�- sub�rade soils 1nd good aggreglte base, the paveinent structure as a
��hole tested structurall�- sound. Therefore. the issue facing the Cit�- is functional and not structural —
meanin� the recurrence of maintenance issues due to the relativel�- ��eak stripped pa�ement material
raveling and brealdng apart.
The rislcs t� of all inill overla�- projects, i.e. reflective cracl�ing and the associated inaintenance
required ��-ere evaluated to determine acceptable i7slc levels. In nine of the t«-elve test inill areas, inilling
��as perforined to evaluate the feasibility of reinoving the upper 2" of stripped inaterial �� ��-as
t�-picall�- the most severe. In eight of those nine areas it ���as determined that the remainin� pavement
posed rislc for eicessive cracicing, thui pavement l���ers, or raveling in the base course. In the tluee
remaining test areas �vhere stripping �� as not present, t�� o displa�-ed more severe craclung in the
bituininous base course uicreasing the potential voluine of reflective cracl�ig.
2013 IMPROVEMENTS
In the suininer of 2013, perinanent cul-de-sacs «ere constructed at the ends of Jasinine and Jeffei
Avenue. The parcels acljacent to the ne« cul-de-sacs are considered a part of this paveinent inanageinent
project, are receivin� benefit, and are therefore participating in the assessinent. The costs to constn�ct the
cul-de-slcs a�e not uicluded in this report and are therefore � cost saviugs to the project and si�bsequent
assessments.
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project Page �
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
SANITARY SEWER
The sanitai se���er s�-stem «�ithin the District Fl consists primaril�r of 8-inch VCP 1nd PVC. The onl�T
e�ception to this is a 12-inch reinforced concrete pipe on Jasmine Avenue bet�tieen 91S` Street and 90
Street. The e�isting sanitai�T se�ver has been televised to evaluate pipe condition. The televising reports
sho« that the pipe is ui good condition. Ho«ever, some probleins encountered ui the eiisting sanitai
se��er ��ere root intrusion, craciced pipe and sags. Miscellaneous structure repaus including patching,
linin�, and other repairs ��-ere noted during the inspections.
WATER MAIN
The �vater inauis «ithin the project area consist of 6, 8, and 24-inch diaineter ductile u pipe. The mains
«�ere installed in conjl�nction �vith the developinent of the neighborhoods. The ��-ater inains are believed
to be in good condition. Ho�vever, 1 valve «ithin Heritage Estates recentl�r had the bolts repllced due to
e�cessive coirosion and it's believed other valves in the area ma�- be in a sunilar condition. Additionallv,
there are eipected to be soine valves ��hich are not operational and ��i11 need to be addressed ��ith the
project. The valves ���ill be operated and evaluated b�- Public Worlcs prior to the start of the project.
STORM SEWER
The ezistuig stonn se���er has been televised to detennine pipe condition and necessai�- repairs. I�i
addition, storm structures «ere also inspected. Storm se��-er mains are generall�- in good condition.
Ho�iever, soine probleins encountered in the ezisting stoi7n se« er �� ere cracked or brolcen pipes 1nd dirt�-
lines. Miscellaneous sU patching, lining, and other repairs �vere noted dui7ng the inspections.
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS - DISTRICTS F1 & F4
STREETS
Due to the range of paveinent ages «ithui Districts F 1 and F4, t�vo primar�- rehabilitation inethods ��- ould
typically be proposed. paveinent replaceinent and inill-overla�-. Ho�vever, due to the obseived depth aiid
eitent of the pavement stripping iu the cores, the results of FWD and test inilling, a�d eitent of previous
Cit�- maintenance, a inill and overla�- is not recoininended at this time. While soine streets ma�- be able to
successfull�- accept a mill-overla�T, there does not appear to be a logical brealc «-ithin the project limits
since the stripping is relativel�r random and severit�- of cracldng in the blse course vlries greatl�-.
Therefore, the project area «�as vie�z-ed as a«hole for future maintenance aiid s�-stein management. If
broken up iuto individual se�ments, each road�va�- seginent �vould peiform differentl�� and reqi�ire
different inaintenance at different times since each rehabilitation has its o«-n lifec�-cle.
Due to the t�pes of distress present in the e�isting plvement, the anticipated acceleration of deterioration
due to asphalt stripping, and rislcs presented in previous sections of this report, the streets �vitlun F 1 and
F4 are proposed to undergo a full paveinent removal and replacement ��ith 3.5 inches ofne�v pavement.
Siuce the concrete curb and gutter is generall�- in good condition, it is proposed to under�o spot
replacement. The curb in poor condition «ill be evaluated for reinovll,just prior to construction, but
preliminar�- estnnates indicate that 8-10% ��ill need to be reinoved and replaced. Where conditions are
faVOrable, the goal is that the concrete curb and gutter last t«�o pavement lifec�-cles. The «ear course is
proposed to be virgin inii, eicluduig the use of rec�-cled asphalt pa�ement (RAP).
lii locations �vhere curb is repllced in fi of drive�va�-s, curb �vill be removed and replaced a�id elch
drive��-a�- ��-ould be patched the entire �� idth �� ith in-kind materials as a part of the street rehabilitation
process. Due to the nature of spot curb replaceinent, this patch typically eitends a fe��- feet behind the
curb. Concrete plds for the coininunit�- inailbo�es �vill also be replaced as a part of this project.
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project Page 5
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Restoration is anticipated to consist of screened Preiniuin Topsoil Borro�v ��-ith a blo��ni coinpost top-
dressing a�id seed.
Traffic signs are proposed to be replaced as a part of this project to meet federal retroreflectivity
requireinents. In addition, signs �� i11 be evaluated for conformance to the aclopted Cit�- sign polic�- and
signs ��il1 be reinoved or suppleinented as requi�
SANITARY SEWER
Inline repau are recoininended to address cracics ��ithin the pipe. Where there are sags ��ith a histoi of
bacic-ups, it is recoimnended that the pipe be reinoved and replaced. The sanitai se« er manhole castings
«�ill be salvaged and reinstalled. The eiisting concrete adjusting ruigs ���ill be replaced ���ith ne�v HDPE
adjusting rings conforin to current City standards.
WATER MAIN
It is proposed that brolcen valve top sections be removed and replaced as a part of this project. In the
Herita�e Estltes Addition, it is proposed that the vllves be dug up and checiced for bolt corrosion and
replaced if necessai As a part of this process, the valve boi should be replaced in conjunction ��, ith that
«ork. Also, there are soine h��drants that should be adjusted. It is proposed to eitend the hvdrant barrel
on each of these h�-drants. Fivallv, concrete h�-drant access pads are proposed to be uistalled at all
h�-dra�ts in accordance �vith current Cit�- sta�dards.
STORM SEWER
Gener111�r spealcin�, the intent of this project is to rehabilitate the streets and not chan�e e�isting drainage
patterns. In-line replirs are recominended to address crlclis, and lealcing or offset joints. St� in
poor condition ���ill be replaced to conforin to current cit�T standards. Adjustinent ruigs for inanholes ��-il1
be replaced �vith HDPE rings. Catch basin rings �vill not be replaced unless the cl�rb adjacent to thein is
removed, or failure of the rings has occurred. The eiisting castuigs ��-ill be salvaged. Miscellaneous
structure patching, linin�, and other repairs �vill be performed as needed.
Public Worlcs staffprovided i�iput on areas ��ith historic drauiage concerns. No inajor floodinb or
drainage issues «ere noted; therefore on1�- minor curb grade modif�ications and valley gutter installations
are proposed to facilitate drainage.
Drainage iininediatel� adjacent to 90` Street �vill be addressed as a part of a fiitl�re 90"' Street project.
STORM WATER QUALITY
Storin ��ater qualit�- nnproveinents are not requi�ed in this nei�hborhood due to no increase of iinpervious
surfacuig.
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS - TRAIL
There is a«ood-chip trail planned for the green space bet«een the residential neighborhood and Wal-
Mart. This trail is proposed to be constructed in the future once additional destinations and trail
connections are �vailable. Therefore, no iinprovements are proposed as a part of this project.
Like t1�e drainage issues along 90` Street, unprovements to the bituminous trail adjacent to 90 are
anticipated to be addressed ��-hen 90 Street is rehlbilitated.
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project Page 6
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
PERMITS AND EASEMENTS
Because the road«a�- construction is considered a inaintenance project that «ould not create an�- ne���
iinpervious surfaces and ���ould not change the eiisting grlde, h�-cl�aulics, or purpose of the road«1�T, the
Phase II General Storin W1ter Permit froin the MPCA �tiould not be required for that portion of the �vork.
It should be noted that the fiiture trail north of Walmart «i11 requu the follo�vin� perinits ��hen that
project inoves fonvard:
. Northein Natural G1s Pipeline encroachinent agreeinent or perinit for trail construction
. MCES encroachinent agreeinent or perinit for trail construction
. NPDES Phase II General Stonn Water Pennit if the area of disturbance is greater than one acre
No additional drainage and utilit�- easeinents are anticipated in the neighborhoods. ho�vever, this �vill be
evaluated during the fin�l design phase of the project.
ESTIMATED COSTS
Cost estunates for the iinproveinents have been prepared and are uich�ded in the Appendii of tlus report.
All costs for iteins to be constn�cted are based on anticipated uiut prices for the 2014 constn�ction season.
All costs include a thirty- (30) percent allo«ance for indirect costs associated «ith the project
(engineeri�ig, aclini�ustrative, fmancing, and legal) as «ell as a ten (10) percent contingenc�-. No costs are
included for capit�lized interest during the construction period or before assessinents are levied.
Follo�� ing is an overall suminai of the estim�ted costs:
Estimated Cost Summary
Location Estimated Project Cost
Pavement Repllcement $3.636,312.68
Total Estimated Project Cost: �3,636,312.68
Costs presented include 10% contingenc�- + 30% uidirect costs
COST ALLOCATION
Assessinents for this project �vill be based upon the "Infi Maintenance Taslc Force Special
Assessinent Polic�- For Public linproveinents," dated Septeinber 30, 2005, Revised August 8, 2012. All
adjacent benefitin� properties are proposed to be assessed. Per the Urban Residential polic�-, 45% of the
project cost for both surface and subsurface improvements ��-ould be assigned to each individual
residential lot on a l�iut basis. The intent of the Cit�'s polic�- is to treat all properties ��ithin a residential
developinent as sunilar individual units rebardless of lot fi The ainount assessed is based on the
Cit�T standard street section even if the «idth is �reater. Cit�T funds ��ould be responsible for the
remaining 55% of the project costs.
Per the polic�-, Cit�--o��med propert�- �vas evaluated in the same manner as commercial/industrial lots
«�here 100% of the project costs adjacent to the propert�r are assessed. In areas ��-here residential propert�-
��as on the opposite side of the street of City- propert�-, h11f of the street �tiidth �tias assigned to the
residential area and the other half to the Cit�-. The estimated project assessments are as follo�vs:
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project Page 7
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
CITY-OWNED PROPERTY:
Estimated Cost Allocation
Estimated
Estimated Total C Total Street City
Property Adjustment
Street Project Cost Property
Location Costs* Cost** Front Ad'acent to for Half of Assessment
� Foota�e � Street***
f� (�/lf� �1� City Property (100% of
Total)
F1 & F4 — Paveinent �97.69 $139.70 20 $2,793.94 $1,396.97 $1,396.97
Replaceinent � �
Totals: $1,396.97
* Construction Cost, incll�des Street c� Utilities
** Tota1 Project Cost (10% Contingenc�- +;0% Indirect)
�`** Includes 50% reduction for propert�- on one side of the street
URBAN RESIDENTIAL LAND USE:
Estimated Cost Allocation
Location Other Funds � Assessed Amount Estimated
(45% of Total) Project Cost
F1 & F4 — Paveinent Replaceinent $2,081,073.�0 $1,�5�,239.18 ��3,636;312.68
Totals: �2,081,073.50 $1,555,239.18 $3,636,312.68
* See Appendiz C for Fund Brealcout. Includes Cit�- funds.
Estimated Cost Per Unit
Assessable Assessed Cost Special Benefit
Location RBLE Assess�ed Amount per RBLE Unit Appraisal
Units �45 /o of Total) per Polic
F1 & F4 — PaVement Replaceinent �13 $1,���,239.18 $3,031.66
:S'ingle Family: S3, 031. « STBD
Should the calculated assessinent eiceed the special benefit appraisal, the single-fainil�- assessinents �� i11
be proposed to be capped at the ainount of the special benefit appraisal. If needed, Cit�� funds ��ill cover
the difference bet« een the calculated assessment and the benefit appraisal.
FINANCING
Assessinents are proposed to be levied based on the Cit�-'s current assessinent polic�-. The reinainder of
the project ��-ould be financed through a combination of Cit�- funds such 1s the General Tai Lev�- and
Enterprise fiinds for iteins such as storin se�� er iinproveinents. Figure 6 depicts the assessable parcels for
the project.
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project Page 8
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC HEARING
Because the properties ��ithin the project area benefit froin the proposed iinproveinents, and the project
«ill be partiall}- fiinded thcough assessinent, it �vill be necessai for the Cit�- to hold a public
i�nproveinent hearing to receive coininent on the proposed project and to deterinine further action to be
taken.
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Belo�ti is the proposed schedule assl�ining starting construction ui 2014:
• 09/0�/2013 Council Orders Feasibilit�r Report
• 11/20/2013 Council Workshop
• 12/12/2013 Hold Neighborhood Meeting
• 12/18/2013 Council Receives and Approves Fe�sibilit�� Report
Council Sets a Public I�nproveinent Hearing Date
• OU1�/2014 Council Holds Public linproveinent Hearing
Council Ordeis the preparltion of the Plans and Specifications
• 03/0�/2014 Council Approves the Plans and Specifications
• 04/03/2014 Project Bid Date
• 0�/16/2014 Contract A«
• Spring 2014 Begin Constiti�ction
• September 2014 Coinplete Construction
• Septeinber 201� Council sets Assessinent Hearing Date
• October 2014 Council holds Assessinent Hearing
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
It is recoinmended that this report be used as a guide for the la�-out, design, and cost allocation for the
public unprovements. It is further recommended that the o�vners of properties �vithin the project limits be
notified of the proposed iinproveinents in order to provide coinment.
To determine project feasibilit�r, a comparison �ti1s made bet« een the costs estimated herein 1nd the costs
e�perienced for other si�nilar projects �z-ithin the Cit�T. These comparisons, on a per linear foot
constiuction cost basis (no indirect project costs), are sho�vn in the follo��-ing table:
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project Page 9
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Cost per Unit Comparison
201� Pavement Management Project (Esti�nated) $97.69
2013 Paveinent Manageinent Project (Bid Results)
District C 1& District C2 — Pa�ement Replacement Area $1 � 1.18
District C2 — Mill & Overla�- Area $94.09
2011 Paveinent Manageinent Project (Bid Results)
Pine Coulee/Counti $68.�9
Ho�� ard's Addition $63.18
2010 Paveinent Manageinent Project - River Acres (Bid Results) $69.14
2008 Pavement Manageinent Project (Bid Results) $96.00
Froin the tabulation above, it can be seen that the cost to rehabilitate in the paveinent replaceinent areas
are less than the costs fi the 2013 Pavement Manageinent Project. This is primaril�- due to the fact that
the eiisting concrete curb and gutter is in better shape «ith less anticipated replacement and therefore less
unpact to eiisting drive��ays 1nd boulevards. In addition, because the curb is being left iu place, placing
street light ��-ire in conduit is not being proposed. In fact, curb dainage is estimated to be less than 2013's
inill & overla�� area.
In contrast, the costs are slightl�- higher than 2011 due to the fact that this project includes streets �z-ith
concrete curb a�d gutter and public sanitaiy se��-er, storm se�ver, and �vater main repairs. In addition, the
street «idths are significantl�- «�ider than the rural residential streets fi 2010 and 2011.
The project is financiall�r feasible, �vith fi�nding sources identified froin the Cit�- as �iell as the benefited
properties adjacent to the project. Financial responsibilities have been deterinined based on estiinated
project costs as ��ell as adopted Cit�- polic�-.
From an engineering st�lndpoint, this project is feasible, necessary and cost effective.
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project Page 10
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Appendix A
Existing Pavement Condition Photos
Cottage
� Grove
� Pride andPCOSPerity Meet
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
n�st�•��t Fi
Approiimate Location: 91�` Street cul-de-sac.
Irregular blocic cracldng �� ith open cracks (approiimatel�- 1.5")
_��- - ,� _ _ _ - _�-
� �-_- r ,. _ _ _ - - _ -
__ —
-F� __ :�-�-
:: _� _-=
- _ l ��� = �
_ � � �. - �
_ - ��� '' -
yr
�. � � -
- _- - =- _n . �
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project
� � ��
District Fl
Approiimate Location: 91�` Street cul-de-sac.
Smaller cracl�ing pattern present near curb, evidence of prior patching.
. - �_
-- - � : ��
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
k: `�
�r`.��
�
District Fl
Approiimate Location: Jareau Ave cul-de-sac.
Early signs of stripping (small holes of seal coating stripping offl.
_ � � _,F: �.... . . - a �
� ` - .,_ ,- .... �
fi� . ' - � . . - :
. _ � ' . � - 'i�,.
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project
n�st�•��t Fi
Approiimate Location: 91 Street «est of Janero Ave.
Blo« patching present along street to patch deterioratnig pavement.
. ��•����..� :��4 s� � ..,..- 3
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
n�st�•��t Fi
Approiimate Location: Jeffer�- Avenue approachuig 90 Street
Thin overla�- along right curb line perforined b5- Public Worlcs.
���� ��� �� � �
;�w.� a � ��� �
' ,�� �. � �" r �:
• - ; , i -t.
_a.0 _ F n
,� � . . � ,.. ;,�,;, tl ;� ,,.
-- _ - �.�_�. 9�� � �^� .
a:. .�_ _
;; _ - - �
�� _ j, �
��y � � �
. ,
,t ___ - -
_.�. , �; ;_
.,,_�-_ _ t ,.;
- - _ � -
..
= - •: ,
, ; j , { _,- . .
�__ � _ ..:
� � �� �"� - �� �
� �, �¢
. . �, . � . „ ��.. .
District Fl
Approiimate Location: Jasinuie Avenue cul-de-sac
Eztensi��e craclting di�e to pa��ement abing is e��ident.
� - �- ��,: � � # ��Mbr° �
� ��'��"`'�' �::. � � -
_ ��
-��
..� _
.� �_
r� ' ' �� �' � �
., , �,:�
F � ' �.�`. ,y }�_ � -�
f i ��
„ N �' �
L.S:.�_Y v , i.n.� . .r.�� _. .� , L` �' _ _ . . . . _
��� ,
, . �
��� ��.
� � � �:
Y '
_ .. . � . � `_.Jm „u. . . ..a .+... _1 . .i�.11`a. l S.L.ruf _�.
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
n�st�•��t Fi
Approiimate Location: 9032 Ja�eau Avenue
Blocic cracicing and occasional blo�� patclung. Soine ��'
�.n. �.���F�' �fr�. — J . ` �Y . � , .
'� l
���� ����_
;..� . -
.,�_ � �
'�� ,�� . . _ i
� �
''� . . � . . � �j�,.
�.r.> :� ,--> � ;_ - --�� a ;-_ �
� �- f ' _: . '.
4. r�
}'� ti '�, � . . .:
N ''
� ��. � . ,. . ;5 �� 'S' . �:
�i.k.- � � . . � - ' � � _ ..
� `
d �� �
f�� ry� � �iA
t
d _ .. ��, . g .
j .`.%Y" �� ? �� W"�� �+ `R" r_
� � K �
,�.. � � �� R
j[ _
J "' f _. . . . � . ' .
. . ., 1 f+.. . . , . .. ,� . � �. .
�1St1'1Ct FI
Appro�imlte Locltion: 93r`' Street east of Jeffer�- Avenue
Thin overla�-s atteinpting to hold together areas of eitensivel�-
� ,.
��.�t� � r �" . .
�,� ,
_ � �
�
_ ��
- ,�.;
� 'o
�..�
H, _ � � �
u � � �
�� � ,� � �� ��4,, ' �
<� ,
���` �3 �� � �
- �- �
`:'��
° . �s
�> - -
_ _�
��,.
� �� -.,
� �;, -�
-��'� -
� ����
;, ��-�..: a
, , - , Y` � ��
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
n�st�•��t Fi
Approiimate Location: Jeffer�- Court
Blo« patching of stripped paveinent.
_�� ~� F . �`;.:
: �,_-="a '
�
'►y,,� � �� ,1 ��
``� � - � :�- . � �° �:
. � s�
� ._ _ - = -._�I
�
� °
..� . _
� - :; ,��: = �
`
. - - -`.
�� _ _ .
n�st����t Fi
Approiimate Location: Jergen Court
Regular transverse (thermal) cracicing ��ith subseqi�ent blocic cracicing present.
,� , ' �. :� x"�`�: '� �1 ,� � c�;�
�
�„.,, , .. �,� :_ �: r
: ,.
,
� -'
. .s� , �:4 ��,__—� � .
..�:�� � - � �-� --- ;�-
����.
� - -
- - ;��.�� �`_-- r,�' _r,�- ��a���ii�� _ ` �
E P� .�.
_ � �-� _,
.k - ,
- - � �
-. - "�
� �� - �
--- - s � �
�•.� ; ,:_. ,.. �. ', ' ,. '.
} __ � ,:.
,�_ — �
_ . _ _. _,.� - - - __ - ._:
� _.�:-'- ° � °`�r� _ -
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
District F4
Approiimate Location: 93 Street and Jasinine Avenue intersection
Stripping and patclung of the eiisting paveinent. Seal coat peeling off paVeinent.
District F4
Approiimate Location: 9301 Jareau Avenue
Eztensive stripping and patching of the ezisting pavement.
� , _ _ - . F � � ��. + � T ��#
...'_�`
r ' � , ._ -
�
. �_
j � e. � , � .,. ..
, ��'� r ... .. �P if �°.
_ - ... � �
^� � �+ � �
�� l � .
�
�-- -... _ :�
_ :�
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project
__ _ ��� � �
, �.3 `�„�� s � �'.`��e
°- : �..;,,._, _
�= -�--
+� :_ �":��� -
_ - � ..,��
_ . . . - _ _ _ _ .,,"-a
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
District F4
Approiimate Location: 9336 Jeffei�T Avenue
Eztensive stripping and multiple patching/overla�-s ofthe e�isting
,1 „ k � ' . �. �� ���y7
� �_ .t� � Pl
� 1 1 k, �
. ... _. � ���h''� � f/ � � . . �4 i.
�—_ �
r�r
.: .. 'r� .�;, .
District F4
Approiimate Location: 9492 Jaiz Avenue
Strippin� alid patching of the ezisting paveinent.
�'� � r'.;
r�.� _._L.
�"'" ,yy'�� . -
�r-
it over time.
�
���a-;� � t , ,
``, � ,�. ,
�" �-� ,- � �; 4
_ra .
�:, r
_ � . v%
,
�-- � � � � � .
,
- . 1 � 11 ��g � _ ' /' ry Y�'"� �-'k' `�: �
.
q :,' ^' .
—� e
��, �_"�"�r� 7' ���
--� '�, � �, _ � '"�. - �-�.�_
- 4- - �
�
°_� �� �
��� �. _ � .__ .
�. __ _ __ _
��_
� = _ -
. . _ �� � _
,�., ���-.' �`' � ��
���''.� .._. . . �� .. �. �'�'.� ,.,� ,._.._. ..,_ ... . � �., ._ _ ..
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Curb to remain
Cracic is ti�ht and there is no settleinent or differential inovement. Curb is fi�nctional.
,. �� � : � L z � x � — � -�..� ,� ,, •� .� „� .
,
a�- T � . ,,� , x..� 5 �'� �� �° o � � % � -�
� ��., � � ,.� � `�+�: '°� ' : L' �a y '.�, �'. �# �7��s� � � � , �+- > , ,
. x i 4f.. '' �. .. ,y,�� � -'�4 ''. � � �F'�' �-., 7 .Ta%. q� A'-. A{j.�„ �".t� ..�'
.. t .. r �� � ,. .
._ v y . y � ,a, •7�p � '� " '
a rv � d � � 5 , � W� .,, � aT'. i h #a �t�� • . iµ, � � 7+ 7+� '� `
�- r a��t�^� E.�„ �'� rr � ��r . '�` � �''�ti
'�' ^ J F : ,+, I �e� . � x W i " � �; #�.
�, a 5h K t • � w f t � ��r i;y,� Y� - �n� �'+„+� ` � • . �.�;- R � ...�, a
� �__. . ,. .s'��._.g *� - ? '�4�5,.'c'S:'� _. '.'?�
4` �,� � � .� � �"� � � �� 1?7�'tl�Y�,� 5. i i .. � � ' ..
� ° n =M . �
�1 , .. � _- , . . .�
Curb to be replaced
Curb that is cracked in multiple locations, has settled, or has raveled and open joints is proposed to be
� ,
. ,
�-. �-�-
,� .�- �-"•��'� ' " -- �":.=Fa,� �'� �,'�-�,"
_ . � , _,� ..�'� ,� ,e.
�, ....��:; . ��
�
�
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project
i
.�� I � : w , ���
`x'�_r� �s,. �'�4a:.��a >,���_� ,x. ,.�'.. ��,,.._ :-s:�c - . _ ' .. . - .
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Appendix 6
Figures
Cottage
� Grove
� Pride andPCOSPerity Meet
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project
Y
�� ,,�; ;
f r�' ��� �> � �
���'' �� � ���
� �,/,/ �
�� ,
, �
__ � ;
,;
��,
,
: _- ; ; �
50 ;
�"%/ �;'
��%%' � I �-1
�;�� �
, � a
/ �- � 325
�� � E
' � � � � / r �` r , �o-; I
� //,��� _—�� � -� I � — �
� , ���. � Ir ra — �
ti
w
>
� I � r i ay�s�� �
� Q >
� � �
� �F , � �
� — � � p
� ..s�--av=��� N�...s��-' � I �I . g l � -
e �
�3J5�
m
�� �0�:-�,8:�� �
��
— 3" 3
� � � —� �
� �� � , . 92NDSrF
— �
� 00 �
�
0 0,� � 0 ,� , ,
/ N� ��� / �� �
� � � G�'-�_�
° � T
,�;;��� _
�
���
C
9oTH �REETSO.
� �
/�
��
��
�� I
�a
'a zo
°o � 3"/1.5" .
JARRO� AVE S0.
�� %� �`!`
�'� I� � �
-� � —�
� PAVEMENTDISTRICTFI , ��
�
��� � � ��� J
����,� ��.. 9oTH�REETSO.
� i
�so I �
/ � �, � � �
�� �
� �� � L. �� .. � � A �a /o � LEGEND:
� � �
� �E � ��a�s io � So � � CONSTRUCTED 1979
� �
• �� . `q � CONSTRUCTED 1987
�_ k H G y
.., d . F 4
�` �, x� j �.�` �"� `p CONSTRUCTED 1988
� ���u ��� b � � lk
���� , �a�� � y :�.� � CONSTRUCTED 1989
������, ?'�€ o� i � � � � ��" � � CONSTRUCTED 1990
� ml � Y._.� 3JS�0� . 92ND� ��
2�
� . � ..._ w CONSTRUCTED 1991
��� ` rbi B/ / ��' �� a za /a
�.���� �� � � s+���� �� �o y _ � � CONSTRUCTED 1993
�� � ;—, � � �� ��= s
_ � 3 �� 0 , � � CONSTRUCTED 1994
"-��'��.� � / �� % _�aa m
�� r �� � `` � 9� CONSTRUCTED 1997
���� ��� �G��� 3 ��� �� �" ,/— �� t����� � �\ � � ��i ���� � �� � ��� i� NEIGHBORHOOD BOUNDARY
o a ia 14 . - � — —
�,., � � m .� � '�, -azv/r��� _ pAVEMENTDISTRICT
,�
�"' ;y: � NorE:
so ! u , � c � y '
'� . / {\`' ' 30.05T0.E� " � HERITA6EESrATESADDITIONANDRID6EWOODSTH
w'
. � ^! 13�9 . � ` � ADDITIONWEREC�NSrRUCTEDINTWOPHASFS
\
� �
� ?1 . � � � � � II �... ,�§ � \. J� �� � ��.
3.5"/2" \� + 3.2 /3 2 "� 3.5' /0 �
.� � � PAVEMENT CORES:
io
`� � ��� -- � X"/Y": EX. BIT. THICKNESS/ DEPTH OF STRIPPING
� z — * >�
— �' _ zs
�3 /3, � � � �Ea� N a4so I � x
— U �. �
� ? -- � - ti ��� � � � PAVEMENTCORE �
� _ � a.zs�va.35 ��
I Ia � �� A- L TEST MILL LOCATION
L�i�:- � ..� �a ,
�a-w�iY-M � �f-�a-lii N
���C�: I � I — _
,�I11 BOLTONN8cEMENEKMNAINC_
Consulfing Engineers & Surveyors
V
COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA
2014 PAVEMENT MANA6EMENT PRQIEC�
�-�,��,. c� �i
- Co�tage Grove ° ��°
� M�inh65017 HorizoncalSalelnFeec
Y
f� L�� `�<i'
i; � �
li
� �
� �%/
`uu1L11 % �
�',� �� /
� ��
� /c � �/ /�\�� —
� � �
�\ ���
� �
�� �
���
� �
i ��
� ��
PAVEMENTDISTRICTFI , .
hoi �� 9o1�s1REE15o. ����—� i �T---- ----r-��-- - �-; y---r-�� i
� �; � � � � �--� `--
/ ~� ��/� ; � I I JARE UAV � � I .. � , L I
/ �'r'�� ' . — .. -i � ' I 'F� . I _ __ I I
, — h
. . . . P. . .. i
> �
I f
z z
i -r
� �� � � �� � �?
\ s .
\ \ r '
� � �' � ��-� a �-f � . . . . ; - so - L
! I `
l , _ i ;_ �_ 1 i� o_ �
� �,c� / � � , �� � � � o
o ,. � , � Q ,�
N � W Q
> � � ° a � ; A 9��RE�SO � _ e �
a � � L � E
� �
� �� � ,
e w
. . p . W . . I J � .
r, ..� F —I- . � a . _ . � � o ..
— � �, � � � �
7
- ,, - 1 . , . . . . — a � �-� ..
0
' 9isrsrwEErso. o � . � ,
� � �� 2 � r
��` � � � � � � � � ���� � � � � � ., \� ,-£ � JE ERY
?
� � � � � A�45o��,
� �� --
�
�_
T
; � �
i>� ��\
� _
�� � l, � ri l di �. ��� ".�
_ _ > —
o �� — � ,� .,\ T � j�' t� , —_ �
� � � �� '� `.-:n., � ezNOSraeErso. �� I _.... �-� � B �
_ � — � � � — . . � � �/ � . �GF . 1
�
0
�. � �
�, � � ,
. o � �� � � . � / I � ,
� � � _— � `. � i ��w � � � P �E ��, � L �, � �
�
�
� � ��� � , .�______� ��_�, � �,
� � _ ��� � �
,- � ,
� � ' �� � ,
�I � Y 9P� � �
� � / � -' �i�` 1
-, , � ��. � � .. �I .
i . ''
� � � � '� - �� ����� � --�
i
0
W � � �,
' o� 93R STR � S �u� g30.0510.EE15
I '� � IARROP..AVE S0. � � ,; � . l .
�_� � � � � �
w � !I .
� � ' � � 1 �'� �'
a , �
� � � � ,
1 I � __, � � ���
� i � �
; ,!_
� —1 � a �
� I�
� = o – �
�� , '� � �
� , �
� . T �'__ _ , � ; �
��
;� _ -_,
I- I'u F-i
-� � -�
� �a ,
.. a —,– . �
– ,- _
— � — ------�f=---�—;
1
,�I11 BOLTONN8cEMENEKMNAINC_
Consulfing Engineers & Surveyors
V
� �i ■
.
i '
� 1
_ 1
1
;�5° � 1
P
, `' � 1
�'� � '```�" 1
�\ � Y �
�_y �� - ���: �� i
� '
1
1
, 1
=a
901� �REE15o.
LEGEND:
XX: PAVEMENT CONDITION RATING
5�
ss
60
65
� � � PAVEMENT DISTRICT
COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA
2014 PAVEMENT MANA6EMENT PRQIEC�
�
�-�,��,. c� �r
- Co�tage Grove ° ��°
� M�inh65017 HorizoncalSalelnFeec
Y
f� L�� `�<i'
i; � �
li
� �
� �%/
`uu1L11 % �
—. � ' � � �
50 � � i /
JQ /� �/,
�%' i,
�c� � i
�., � � / � ,, �•�
�� /
� /c � �/ /�\�� —
� � �
�\ ���
� �
eorH sraeerso.
_ � I��� ''� '���������
' �� � � 4isrsrPoEErs'o. � �. � —.
� �
i
`1S � � y_� � � � �_r_�- � �_�_�_'
�� L�I L�I - -I
= � �I
z � ��,�]
� 0 0 � ����I
�
/ ���
�
__�_�-.
�� �
���
� �
i ��
� ��
PAVEMENTDISTRICTFI , .
eorH sraeerso.
�
LEGEND:
� PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT
FUTURE TRAIL
� � � PAVEMENT DISTRICT
� � ,.� ;;� � � � --- � �-- r � �
� � � � � �. � � ,
� i �_�� � r . �,, � '
� — � ' '� �� � . � �
— �
Q
\ _ ;: , /\" �
� �� /� - �, ��eaeqNa so � — �
� a
" _1 ,� III ��
�� W �
� �� �� � � �� � �
j Jaaa o ve — —
� � ;� g .. .. ___. _ .. _ .. . . _.._ ..
F� _ 1 �� � � �� I - —
_ -- � i
� ;�_. : � -- . _;_ _ __
�
1� 1
�- _ _ 1 ..=I �
� � � �I �� � �,
� BOLTON 8c MENK� INC COTTAGEGROVE,MINNESOTA
Consulfing Engineers & Surveyors 2014PAVEMENTMANA6EMENTPROJECT
r PROPOSEDIMPROVEMENTS FIC;l1RF4
�-�,��,. c� �f
- Co�tage Grove ° ��°
� M'inn65017 HorizoncalSalelnFeec
�, .. �
/_ , .
;��� r, �;> �
� � ���
� � �/ �
�� J, ;
--=��,��
_
. . �_
�_
,
,
-
___ . . _
5� ; ` �
,� <
�� , I I
//�� Y
//� � � —
� �n� ��
- ' ��� ��
;� ��� �
�l \ _
,, �
\� �
\\�\ . , �
\\\���
, ;
_
� \, � .
��
�
�
��
�
� �
/ ^ \ '�\
/ \
\ \
� �
� /
�
�;
—I
�L I
1 9
�
�.�50. . II �
�� —
��
II I I
I
,
6P�
� ; -- - -- --_-
�oTH�REETSO. —
i !
LEGEND
� REPL4CEVALVEBOXANDBOLTS
�
� STORMSEWER:
PATCH STRUC�URE ( WALL, INVERT, OR DO6HOUSE)
. STORMSEWER:
ADD 1-FT BARRELSEC�ION
-. SANITARVSEWER:
ADD 1-FT BARRELSEC�ION
� SANITARVSEWER:
PATCH STRUCTURE (WALL, INVERT, OR DO6HOUSE)
� SANITARVSEWER:
4' OPP REPAIR
SAN ITARV SE W ER:
REMOVE & REPL4CE 50' SE6MENT
I . �. SANITARVSEWER:
} CHEMICALROOTTREATMENT
� STORMSEWER:
�. 4' OPP REPAIR
1 � � i '\ �`�;.,,'`� - �\\\ ! I I �
� i ��� �� / . �
w
'a
Q z
z
w
I� �
w w ;
� _
� 1� 1 —
�.
� � a� � �
s _ or � , �
—« _ .- � ,� —� --�
� :.
�'��-' I�.��� ' 9
. . -. ' ..I''. .
� BOLTON 8c MENK� INC COTTAGEGROVE,MINNESOTA
Consulfing Engineers & Surveyors 2014PAVEMENTMANA6EMENTPROJECT
r UTILINIMPROVEMENTS FIGl1RF5
�-'.�� CI�Y O{
i� - Co�tage Grove
M �innssoia
� ,� /., \t /
�
� ��
"'�i'il �
�� �
�
� � ��� � � ( PAVEMENTDISTRICTFI ,�_
�� � � � � � � �
�.... _.,�� . . .. �. . .. � � �
i
, �` . .�.�. . . 0 �.� � � � � � � � � � �_� � � � � �. � � � �_� T�I� � i � � � �1 � � _, . ..
— eorHSraeerso. �� eorHSraeerso.
�5�� � i �. � � . a so � vi sovi ooi � ooa �
sozs-�� so soo
r �� ' ic o .. e sois u -�� I
oii s
c.� / ' � � ie ° ' I sooa � � sois - _
'� �' ; z . .. a ._ � soas .. � soia ^ �� soio � oii �
� �; ' � . . x .. . � ` __ , soas sooa�- o —
� <. , a ;.� -'
�P� ' e., 0 5osi 3 �qREA 2 � � g s o15
�� . z 902 9R�1 — \ � �
^ 06a ? 6 _ 906] . �� 0oe � �S , -�--
,�� y 026 03 '
�
90
� � 80 .
� / 1 a I �;.. 03
� � ai �
� � �� �. �.���. �� � s . � � o,a � � o '� M�"Enar veea�� �I I �
'> , . aa3 ,9� � . . oa3 �
: � i � . �� . ° � oaa � �g �' o � � � � � . I �
go s
� J
� � za s�3o sos
' � �. � s �. �� 9�0o I I � x' �- �
os I � I
� �ss s so �
: � d � - I .. . � : �� �� e �aeErs ., � �� se �sosa �p.� � s �
�
�' 'a Q
,� J V ^ � eevi m esc eec� �-� srsraeErs sm ��� sne � si�n � _� I e � P`'��
s�aesae
'/ \ � 9�,9 I s' �� s��s � � 6\ �� os '
o. � �� � v F AC s 1
_ o �
' W ss
� � � � ss� � F
� '� a�Taa3��aa �aa��aaa�a �as��as�a �ssas,asss so�3 soz, � � I s�3 6 ��� ,� s��ss sz s�oo ;? � z �� � i go � i F�N s
� � . . , . . � . . . . � s�� ` '� � �
� � �so � �� ` �,P°- " ,�" �a� 03 A��� I soa3�
' / . So �����r�� ������� ��� siso � ei ' sia , si 0e ��,�
� s ' � g ��� �- .
� 0 s�,� �sa �a � i �s�� > ' � �� 1
y; � ' ' � 9a,6 a
o ,—, I—I �J �! 89 � � 6° �
F Q
� \ CI ' siez 9 ,�e �zs s 3el aµ I l si I 2 8 g 2 ; 9 ��92NDSTRE
� h _
\ � � ,_ 9s�oc — i3 I— sia � z ass1
� , 92ND y � C �'
0
r 1
z
0 91a3 � 0
� � 'E 0 �� � 1 � —T
�_ � ❑ �� 1
� a � zza , �ti I I I ��EFFEaa v�E ._ -� e � . o z, m a
� �� [ �� � � ° r� r �, � .� r� !� � I � , < z�' z � zas �
g
��. A � a � � , �, s
� � 9
� e 1t� FV 6P�' � 1 9 �
\ \� i 3
\\\\ I / � � aos 6 �saas iii � 4< _ - �9za s �;��
\ F m � �y '
I r �
\ 1 ; ... I :� J .. � 1� savz .
� se
/�� n
�\ \\ ` � 933 I I , 5 g � s 93R� SfREET50 ,� 3a �0.p5T0.EE�'A 1�..'
O �
� � � � PAVEMENTDISTRICTF4 ��� � , - � ��� 93ge � o ��, �� � g3 33 � 93i �
� � �aaaoo ave so 395 e
N e� si
� � ° � sa � 'a _ ,_�� l 3 ��r �� . � �
� �� �r �.� � /sae�� � � � saee . � se s ��I���vf aie az � �
� , � 9 � � � � �° _
� _ � 1 _ a sa, � � �I 's — a33 s s �' II
� _` z ,s � � � — I � , I � � 3 o I 3
z
�
�,
,
- ` �aaaoo ave so sa�a °3
� , � / > , � _ — ' � a�so � ��
� ss " a a
� � � saee �saso�sasz sase � — a ' o ' 88 � saae � I .
sa � ��
i
== e o
, �_ �m aaos
, , � a� sas=
�_ , � _ �—�-- — — � � _ _°� �_ ��---�_ _ � � �
' ��� - , I I
RESIDENTIAL
CITY PROPERN
Cityof AI� BOLTON 8c MENK, INC_ COTTAGEGROVE,MINNESOTA
� �,
i Co�tage Grove � ��� ,�,I11 Consulfing Engineers & Surveyors 2014PAVEMENTMANA6EMENTPRQIEC�
�, Hor�o„c�i saie i„ r�� W N
Mlnnssoia b cH�Ka,MNaa�EV,MNM��w000,MNeaa�NE�,MNaM6,�a I ASSESSABLEPARCELS
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Appendix C
Cost Estimate Summary
Cottage
� Grove
� Pride andPrOSPerity Meet
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Appendix D
Preliminary Assessment Roll
Cottage
� Grove
� Pride andPCOSPerity Meet
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project
Preliminary Assessment Roll
District F1 Pavement Replacement
Parcel ID District Owner Address Units $/Unit Total /Unit
2102721110003 F1 2ERR MICHAEL P& BONNY 1 9000 JANIE FlVE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110004 F1 TURNER PATRICIA � 90161�NIE AVE 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2102721110005 F1 PETERSEN NIN� M& SHEENA M MONSRUD 903L�NIE FlVE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721ll0006 F1 FUCHS TERRY J& D�NA J 9048 JANIE �VE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110007 F1 NORDMAN ALl�N H&JUDITH L 9064JANIEAVE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110008 F1 DERRY WILLI�M L 90801�NIE �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110009 F1 WESTI�SONT&J�COBSJENNIFER 9096J�NIEAVE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110010 Fl WESSINGER WILLIAM A& M�RILYN 9llL�NIE AVE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
210272ll100ll Fl LANE GABRIEL D 91281�NIE �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110012 F1 GUST�FSSON JOHN Fl& LERIN M METZKE 91441�NIE �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110013 F1 ELTHONJUSTIN&CRYSTl�L 893891STST5 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2102721110014 Fl GEYENMF�RC&LINDSEY 8924915TST 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721ll0015 F1 GUY JEFFREY A& SANDR� D 8910 915T ST S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110016 F1 BUCHHOLZD�NIELJ 8900915TST 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110017 F1 HEMMESCHDEBR�G&TROYE 8886915TST5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
210272ll10018 Fl ICORFMICH�ELJ&ELIZ�BETHA 8880915TST5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110019 Fl WHEELOCKIEFFREYS&DEN6EL 8874915TST 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110020 F1 KLEIN 1�ME5 R& KARYN L 8868 91ST ST 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2102721110021 F1 SOBYTIMOTHYM&LAW�NN�C 8862915TST5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721ll0022 F1 ANDERSONTHOMASI&LAUR�M 8856915TST5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
210 27 21110 0 23 Fl LINDEM�NPHILIPG&PATRICIA�LINDEMAN 8850915TST5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110024 F1 LINDSTROM KRIS R& C�ROLYN M 8844915TST 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110025 F1 V�NOVERBEKE JEFFREY E& CHRISTIN� M VANOVERBEKE 8838 915T ST 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110026 Fl BERGD�LLJOHNE&ELI2ABETH 8832915TSTS 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
210272ll10027 Fl HORNESJAMESD&REBKCALSCHMIDTKE 8826915TST5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110028 F1 HOFFROGGE D�VID PJ & TR�CY L 8820 915T ST 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110029 F1 SECRETARY OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT 881491STST 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2102721110030 Fl W�GNER PHILIP �MOS & LIND� M 8808 915TST 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721ll0031 F1 ELLISON R�YMOND E& K�REN 5 8802 915T ST 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110032 F1 T�PE JERRY W& CINDY 5 8803 915TST5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110033 F1 COOPER CR�IG D& NREK� L 8817 915T ST 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
210272ll10034 Fl REN�RDR�NDY&PAMELA 8831915TST5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110035 Fl BIRKELFlNDIEREMYC 8845915TST 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110036 F1 ROSEJENNIFERK&JEFFREYl� 885991STST 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2102721110037 F1 KIBW�N�THOM�S&YOL�NDFl 8873915TST 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721ll0038 F1 PEREZ D�VID & HORACIO PEREZ 8887 915T ST S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110039 Fl ARMBRUSTERJOSEPH B& REBECCA 8901915TST 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110040 F1 MARSHALL DON�LD 1& ALICE L 8915 915T ST 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110041 F1 M�LLFlT TROY F& DIANA M 8929 915T ST 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102�21ll0042 Fl �K�KPO YAO 8943 915TST 1 53,031.66 $3,031.66
210272ll10043 Fl PIN�ULT�SHLEYN 8957915TST5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110044 F1 THORNTON ROBERT M 1R & DI�NE D 8971 915T ST 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110045 F1 MEIERIOHND&JENNIFERL 898591STST 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2102721110046 Fl GEBHARDT KELLY G& Ll�URIE A 8999 915TST 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721ll0047 F1 OTTE JOSEPH & CHRISTWE 9178 JANERO �VE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110048 F1 M�RK EZEKIEL 916L�NERO �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110049 F1 I<IMB�LL SCOTT D& JO�N M 91461�NER0 �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
210272ll10050 Fl STRWE JEFFREY �& KATHLEEN M 91301�NER0 �VE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110051 Fl �SHENFlR GET�HUM H& SENNT K BEDASSO 91141�NER0 AVE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110052 F1 SMITH DIANA L 90981�NER0 AVE 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2102721110053 F1 SCH�B�CKER JEFFREY 5& LYNN � 908L�NERO �VE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721ll0054 F1 SIREK SHFlUN R& �IMEE R W�RNER 9066 JANERO �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721ll0055 Fl NYQUISTGARYR&SHERYLI 9050JANERO�VES 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110056 F1 MILLER R�LPH L1R & LIND� L 90341�NER0 �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110057 F1 SHERM�N MICHAEL F& SUSAN M 90181�NER0 AVE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110058 Fl W�TTERSJENNIFER M&JOSHUA R 900L�NERO AVE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
210272ll10059 Fl WELLS WILLIAM L& ROX�NN 90011�NIE �VE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
21027211100W F1 KUNZ ROBERT 1& RITFl K 90171�NIE FlVE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110061 F1 JUNGWIRTHBRENDAA 90331�NIEAVES 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2102721ll0062 Fl RELOC�TIONPROPERTIESMANA6EMENTLLC 9049JANIEAVES 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721ll0063 Fl RPM INV GROUP 9065 JANIE �VE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110064 F1 H�MM�RSTEN M�RK Fl& CHRISTWE 908L�NIE �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110065 F1 BRUMM TODD G& LIS� � 90971�NIE �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110066 Fl YOUNGQUIST GREGORY M& KARA L 91131�NIE �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110067 Fl LEW6 SCOTT M& NANCY JEAN 91291�NIE �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110068 F1 WENDELTHOM�S�&KAUPTRFlCY 91451�NIEAVE 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2102721110069 F1 M�URER WILLIAM E& JENNIFER S 9161 JANIE FlVE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721ll0070 F1 BERGER CH�NCE L 9177 JANIE �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110071 Fl NGEH EV� K 9179 JANERO �VE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110072 F1 I<OSKI D�NIEL W& PAMEL�1 91631�NER0 �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110073 F1 KREMMW CHRISTWE�NN 9147J�NERO�VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110074 Fl KOGER FlDAM 1& ERIN M 91311�NER0 AVE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
210272ll10075 Fl I(LIMMEKJOSEPHM&SAMUELI(KLIMMEK 91151�NEROAVES 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110076 F1 BRIGGS SCOTT N& ANGELA M 90991�NER0 FlVE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
Preliminary Assessment Roll
District F1 Pavement Replacement
Parcel ID District Owner Address Units $/Unit Total /Unit
2102721110077 F1 UDELHOFEN PHILLIP C& DEBOR�H M PR�WER 90831�NER0 �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110078 Fl BAHLTHOM�S D& B�RB�RAJ 90671�NER0 �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
210272ll10079 Fl YZERM�NS M�RK F& DEE�NN M DENNING 90511�NER0 �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102�21ll0080 Fl BROUWER SCOTT K& PEGGY 5 90351�NER0 AVE 1 $3,031.66 53,031.66
2102721110081 F1 L�RSENBRENTT&1�CQUELWEA 90191�NEROAVE 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2102721110082 F1 SILVERGLATE TRIN� M 90031�NER0 �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721ll0083 F1 HAS�N MIRJ� M& KAOSFlR S 9013 915T ST 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2102721110084 Fl LF�FORGE JOANN M 9027 915TST 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210001 F1 PEPER M�RY L 90471�SMWE �VE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210002 F1 VOLKK�RENL 90531�SMWE�VES 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210003 Fl SORENSON ROGER W& SUSAN R 90671�SM W E �VE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210004 Fl NIENOWIOSHUA&T�NYA 90771�SMWEAVES 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210005 F1 D�VIS F�ARON 9048 JEFFERY �VE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210006 F1 KEEN RENEE C 9030 JEFFERY AVE 5 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2202721210007 Fl JONES DON�LD R 9022 JEFFERY �VE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210008 F1 BROWN CHRISTOPHER M& SUS�NNFlH K 9010 JEFFERY �VE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210009 F1 MYCKELBY WESLEY L& PFlR6 Fl 900LEFFERY �VE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210010 F1 OROPEZAJESSE M 900LEFFERY �VE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
22027212100ll Fl SPENCER CR�IG E& D�RLENE L 901LEFFERY �VE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210012 F1 lOHN50N STEVEN A& BARB�RA A 9025 JEFFERY AVE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210013 F1 MANSHIP 1FlME5 L& BEVERLY A 9029 JEFFERY AVE 5 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2202721210014 F1 TOTH L�UR� M& BRIAN 5 9033 JEFFERY �VE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210015 F1 JONES D�VID C& L�URIE LYNN 9041 JEFFERY �VE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210016 Fl NEUM�NN ERIK E& DEBRA L 9055 JEFFERY �VE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210017 F1 �BB�S TROY M 9069 JEFFERY �VE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210018 F1 GROVUMD�VID1&K�THERWE� 9198915TST5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210019 Fl H�GENS KAYL� A 9098 JEFFERY �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210020 Fl CONLW EDW�RD 1 JR & DIANE 9038 JEFFERY �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210021 F1 D�VIS KYLE LIN 9078 JEFFERY �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210022 F1 STRAFELDA G�RY D& RITA M 9068 JEFFERY AVE 5 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2202721210023 F1 ALLM�N GARY W& PATRICI� A 9058 JEFFERY AVE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210024 F1 JANKEKI�MESE 9209915TST5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210033 F1 RIDDLE D�NIEL1 &JEN� M BECHEL 9139JEFFERY �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210034 F1 SCHLEH JEFFREYI & LAUR� L 9135 JEFFERY �VE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210035 Fl ENGLUND JON�TH�N E& 1BSICA K 913LEFFERY �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210036 Fl �NDERSON JULIE K 9127 JEFFERY AVE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210037 F1 THENED�NIELS 9123JEFFERYAVE 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2202721210038 F1 HOGSTFlD HISFlKO K 9ll9 JEFFERY �VE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210039 F1 COLLINS MICH�EU & ANNETTE L 9115 JEFFERY �VE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210045 F1 ANDERSON TIMOTHY 6& JEAN E 9098 JENSEN �VE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210046 F1 SPICER STEVEN M& CHERYL� 9094JENSEN �VE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210047 F1 M�RTIN 1�SON J& MICHELLE FlM 9086 JENSEN �VE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210048 F1 BR�NN�N DEBORAH � POR�TH & CHAD M WILHELM 907LENSEN �VE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210049 Fl BL�CK D�VID M& KRISTWE C 9062 JENSEN �VE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210050 F1 UYJAMES 905LENSEN AVE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210051 F1 �NDERSON DALE C& ROSEMl�RY E 9046 JENSEN �VE S 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2202721210052 F1 I<ATH RON�LD M& I<ATHRYN 1 9038 JENSEN �VE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210053 F1 MIKE RYGH HOMES WC 9024JENSEN FlVE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210054 F1 SMITH BRI�N R& S�R�H E 9014JENSEN �VE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210055 F1 POKEL� KEITH �& DARLA K 9008 JENSEN �VE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210056 Fl WIETGREFE WESLEY N& JE�NNE 9004 JENSEN �VE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210057 Fl LEVAKE MICHFlEL W& MARG�RET 9087 JENSEN �VE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210058 F1 HARPER CYNTHIAJE�N MOODY 9079JENSEN AVE 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2202721210059 F1 DONLIN 1�ME51 & VICKI L 9075 JENSEN AVE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210060 F1 NOLTE PAUL1 & MFlRCY � BOVALD 9071 JENSEN FlVE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210061 Fl M�GEE�NDR�EA 9063JENSEN�VES 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210062 F1 SCHNEIDER D�VID & LINDA L P�TTEN 9057 JENSEN �VE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210063 F1 SPEIRS BRUCE J& MICHELLE A 9051 JENSEN �VE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210064 Fl KOREN MARK A& ANNETTE M 9049 JENSEN �VE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210065 Fl BURCI�GA JOSE �& GLORI� 9039 JENSEN �VE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210066 F1 MILLER ELISA M 9027 JENSEN AVE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210067 Fl OLSON ANDREW M& TARA1 HUXFORD 9017 JENSEN �VE S 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2202721210068 Fl STROMBRADL&IULIEM 9009JENSEN�VES 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210069 F1 BLOMGREN VICKIE L& D�NIEL M 9005 JENSEN �VE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210070 Fl ICRINGSJE�N M& DANIELJ 9006JERGEN �VES 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210071 F1 JUSTICE DEREK H 9012 JERGEN AVE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210072 Fl MUSKOPF CLINTON R& DEBORAH K 9016 JERGEN AVE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210073 Fl VFlNG LA MEE & KONG PHENG & P�KOU VFlNG 9026 JERGEN AVE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210074 F1 HEROFFIOHNC&1FlNELD 9032JERGENAVES 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2202721210075 F1 OOMS ROGER R& KIM I 9040 JERGEN AVE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210076 F1 OTTIACKIE D& K�THLEEN M 9044JERGEN �VE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210077 Fl TH�O M�I M& TIA Y�NG 9054JERGEN �VE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210078 F1 HOLMES G�RY G& JUDITH A 9060 JERGEN AVE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210079 F1 DOUBLIN ROBERT N& KRISTI H 9070 JERGEN �VE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
Preliminary Assessment Roll
District F1 Pavement Replacement
Parcel ID District Owner Address Units $/Unit Total /Unit
2202721210080 F1 ROHRKELSEYJ&SHERRIEL 9080JERGEN�VES 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210081 F1 SCHMITTJ�Y H 9084JERGEN AVE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210032 Fl ICV�M J�MES D 9096 JERGEN �VE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202�21210083 F1 ROHR MARK P 9111 JERGEN AVE S 1 $3,031.66 53,031.66
2202721210084 F1 TOBRITZHOFER P�MELA J& R08ERT 9083 JERGEN AVE S 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2202721210085 F1 FINK THOM�S �& CHERYL A 9081 JERGEN AVE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210086 F1 R�SMUSSEN I<URT K& COLLEEN M 9073 JERGEN FlVE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210087 Fl ANDERSON MARI< W& LORI A 9065 JERGEN �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210088 F1 MCQUEEN REBECUJ C 906LERGEN AVE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210089 F1 NEILSONMARK�&JOYM 9059JERGEN�VES 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210090 Fl KNUDTSON DONFlLD G& N�NCY A 9053 JERGEN AVE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210091 Fl FEDERAL NATION�L MORTGAGE �SSOCIATION 9043 JERGEN AVE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210092 F1 K�RELS 1EFFREY R& SHERRY K 9035 JERGEN AVE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210093 Fl KUHNS THOM�S B& �MY K 903LERGEN AVE S 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2202721210094 F1 M�NNWG THOMAS ROBERT & F�Y 9019 JERGEN �VE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210095 F1 BREZW K� Z�CH�RY � 9007 JERGEN �VE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210096 F1 EDW�RDS BRY�N D& ELLEN L 9003 JERGEN �VE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210107 Fl OLIVIER LLEWELLYN 9159 JEFFERY �VE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210108 Fl B�DGER ROBERT D 915LEFFERY �VE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210109 Fl COLON lOSE �& MARIBEL 9143 JEFFERY AVE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210110 F1 VIAENE KEVW E& VICKIE L 9103 JEFFERY AVE 5 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2202721210ll1 F1 BCC HOLDINGS LLC 9ll1 JEFFERY �VE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210112 F1 D�WSEY R�ND�LLFl & D�WN M 9099 JENSEN FlVE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210113 F1 TUTHILLIULIE L 9095JENSEN �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210114 F1 HOOPM�NIUSTINR 949892NDST5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210115 F1 FEDERFlLHOMELOFlNMORTGAGECORP 947692NDST5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210116 F1 OLWELLMICHELEM 946492NDSTS 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210117 Fl JORGENSON JENNIFER L 9197 JERGEN AVE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210ll8 F1 SCHROEDER CYNTHI� B 9189 JERGEN AVE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210119 F1 VANWUK C�RL L& ELIZE M 9104 JERGEN AVE 5 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2202721210120 F1 L�WRENCETODDI&JENNIFERM 9110JERGEN8�Y5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210121 F1 FR�NCIS NICOL�S & SHERYL RICHIE 9116 JERGEN BFlY S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210122 F1 OLDH�M SH�WN & HEIDI B 912LERGEN B�Y S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210123 F1 NELSON MICH�EL B& KIMBERLY J 9128 JERGEN B�Y S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210124 Fl WOLTJER EDW�RD D& MARG�RET I( 9134 JERGEN B�Y S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210125 Fl RAMMER PAUL K& JODI L 9176 JERGEN B�Y 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210126 F1 TORRENS BENIFlMIN W& HOLLY R 9182 JERGEN BAY S 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2202721210127 F1 KVAMME MICHAELS & BRENDFl L 9188 JERGEN BAY 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210128 F1 SHFlHID NOREEN 9194JERGEN FlVE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210129 Fl HM6JEREMYM 9200JERGEN�VES 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210130 F1 I<OOSM�NNJESSICAD&PHILLIP 949992NDST5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210131 F1 B�KERK�RRIL&THOM�SJSCHWINGLESR 948792NDST5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721210132 Fl M�NGU�RDIA GRE AM & LILIBETH P MANGU�RDIA 9455 92ND STS 1 53,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220001 Fl BECKER 1�SON D& M�RISA L 90051�REAU AVE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220002 F1 WESTPH�L R�LPH G 90131�RE�U �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220003 F1 WITTENBERGKIMBERLYA 902L�RE�UAVE 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2202721220004 F1 B�YUNUS OW�IS & KISHWAR 9029 JARE�U AVE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220005 F1 LIND�HL DU�NE �& JILL M 9037 JARE�U �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220006 F1 BE�RD TR�VIS N& JO�N M 90451�RE�U AVE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220007 F1 GENET JOHN � III & KRISTEN 5 90531�RE�U AVE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220008 Fl CR�IG EDW�RD P JR & �NGELA M 90611�RE�U �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220009 F1 �NDRES FRANK 1& DEBRA A 90691�REAU FlVE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220010 F1 SWEDZINSKI PFlTRIQ<J &JENNIFER L 90771�RE�U AVE 5 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
22027212200ll F1 SULLIVFlN DWIGHT T& MICHELLE L ROBERTS 90851�RE�U FlVE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220012 F1 D�WN HOWARD J JR & DE'ANNE M 9093 JARE�U �VE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220013 Fl HELMERICK�RTHURJ&M�RYJ 9100915TST5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220014 F1 L�CROIXJEREMYS&IUMBERLYR 9106915TST 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220015 F1 BUETTNERPHILLIPJ&JOYN 9112915TST5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220016 F1 WINKLER DENNIS W& SANDR� D 9118 915TSTS 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220017 Fl LARSON LEDEFlN R& JUDITH 91131�RVI5 �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220018 F1 MULGREW DOUGLAS & SPEEDLING A& FlNN-MFlRIE SPEED 91291�RVI5 AVE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220019 F1 PADILLA M�RVIN 91451�RVI5 �VE 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2202721220020 Fl SOLEM JOSEPH D& I<�THLEEN M W 9161 JARVIS �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220021 F1 PETTEY ERIC L& CARRIE L 9177 JARVIS FlVE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220022 F1 SORENSON D�N� SOREN & Y�RITZY SORENSON 91931�RVI5 �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220023 F1 LEVINGSHOMER&ELIZABETH 912092NDST5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220024 Fl SWF�NSON COREY 1& TR�CY A 9126 92ND ST 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220025 F1 XIONG YEE R& XAO L 9132 92ND ST 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220026 F1 MURPHYPATRICKD&KIMBERLEYL 913892NDST5 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2202721220027 F1 SCOTT CH�RLES P& BRENDFl K 919L�RVIS AVE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220028 F1 HAYDEN JOHN E& DEBORAH 1 9178 JARVIS FlVE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220029 Fl H�RTM�NN LAURY I< 9164J�RVIS �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220030 F1 STRAU55 M�RTIN J& K�Y M 91501�RVI5 �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220031 F1 LEFEBVRE MFlTTHEW 1& DE�NN� D 9136 JARVIS AVE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
Preliminary Assessment Roll
District F1 Pavement Replacement
Parcel ID District Owner Address Units $/Unit Total /Unit
2202721220032 F1 THIELEN GREGORY 1& DI�NE 912L�RVIS �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220033 F1 DUESCHER RITA M�RIE 91081�RVI5 �VE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220034 Fl RHT WOODRIDGE LLC 91151�RE�U �VE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220035 Fl VFlLERIUS 10HN A& MARY K 91251�REAU FlVE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220039 F1 BOBIQ< KURT F& J�NET F 90041�RE�U AVE 5 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2202721220040 F1 RWGSTF�D 1�ME5 A& DIFlNE H 90181�RE�U FlVE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220041 F1 BRUCHEZWENDYI 9032JARE�U�VES 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220042 Fl B�TT�LION PETER P 9046 JAREF�U AVE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220043 F1 I<UE X�NG 1& M�Y VANG 90601�RE�U AVE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220044 Fl LINDELL GER�LD 90741�RE�U FlVE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220045 Fl HOLLERUNG GINA R& BARB�RA 1 HOLLERUNG 90881�RE�U FlVE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220046 Fl UHLENDORF MICHAELI & �MY 1 91001�REAU AVE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220047 F1 0'BRIEN TIMOTHY T& LYNNE M 9llO 1�RE�U �VE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220048 F1 DUFOUR RICHFlRD H& MARY 1 91201�RE�U AVE N 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2202721220051 Fl WHITMOREBARRYC&CATHYL 9002J�SMWEQS 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220052 F1 HUEBSCHDEREI<&�LISA 9004JASMWECTS 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220053 F1 ROBERTSONANGEL�M 90061�SMWECTS 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220054 F1 VERDICKI�ME55&HE�THERM 90081�SMWECTS 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220055 Fl WIETECICI STEPHEN A& LORI A 90101�SM W E CT 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220056 Fl STREHLO CORISSA L 901L�SM W E CT 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220057 F1 HUESMANNMICHAEL&STOEHRIOKA&JOKAYSTOEHR 90141�SMWECTS 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2202721220058 F1 DELEON STEVEN & DIFlNFl 90161�SM W E CT S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220059 F1 DOCHNI�KCHRISTOPHER&DI�N� 9018JASMWECTS 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
22027212200W F1 SISNEROSMICHAELP&�NESS�D 90201�SMWE�VES 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220061 F1 L�NIKSTEVENJ 90441�SMWE�VES 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220062 F1 BIENIEKJ�CKT&GEORGF�NNEM 9078J�SMWEAVES 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220063 Fl UEYONAH�RALAUR� 90881�SMWE�VES 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220064 Fl SECRET�RY OF HOUSING & URB�N DEVELOPMENT 9190 915TST5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220065 F1 BRAND�SHLEYK 9166915TST5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220066 F1 NICKLAYJOHNROBERT&JUDITH 914491STST5 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2202721220067 F1 FRETSCHELS�RAHE&JOHNRH�NSONIII 9130915TST5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220068 F1 B�NZI<EVINR&M�RIC 9124915TST5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220069 Fl MURR�YSRTIMOTHYP&DIONEM 90031�SMWEFlVES 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220070 F1 MCGOW�NPETERJOSEPH&LE�ANN�S�MSMCGOW�N 90111�SMWE�VES 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220071 Fl CRUZFR�NKLG 90191�SMWEAVES 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220072 Fl KORF MITCHELL D& BARBARA Fl 90311�SM W E AVE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220073 F1 MUFFATIEFFRYC&JULIEZ 9085JASMWE�VES 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2202721220074 F1 V�NHOVEN PETER C& JULIA Fl 90911�SM W E �VE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220075 F1 MEYER HAROLD W& DENISE A 9125 915T ST S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220076 Fl LOMF�NIERRYM&JENNIFERJ 9137915TST5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220077 F1 P�TTEN LIND� 9151915TST5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220078 F1 JONESCONNIEL 9108J�SMWEAVES 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220079 Fl WOLTERINGDAVIDI&11LLM 91401�SMWE�VES 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220030 Fl SCHLICHTEGLEN� 91521�SMWEAVES 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220081 F1 NIT2 PETER 1& SHEIL� � 91661�SM W E �VE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220082 F1 SMITH STEVEN N08LE & JUDITH L 91741�SMWE �VE S 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2202721220083 Fl LOONEYDANIELJ&BRID6ITTN 9188JASMWEF�VES 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220084 F1 BISHM�NCOREYM&MELISS�� 9187JASMWE�VES 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220085 F1 P�TRICKMLYNCHREVTRS 91791�SMWE�VES 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220086 F1 JUDI<INSIOHND&PAMEL�� 91611�SMWE�VES 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220037 Fl SCHUMIMICH�ELT&RUTHL 91551�SMWEF�VES 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220088 Fl HOVDE FRANK C& MARY ANN 91411�SM W E AVE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220089 F1 HODGE FlNTHONY Fl& SHFlWNA R 91231l�SMWE �VE S 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2202721220090 F1 L�NZ JAMES W& KELLY 1 9103 JASM W E �VE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220091 F1 RECHTZIGEL BETHANY � 9199 915T ST 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220092 Fl D�VISSH�NER&JENNIFERJ 9118JEFFERY�VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220093 F1 CARTERJODI K 9136 JEFFERY �VE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220094 F1 QUFlST D�VID E& CRISTWFl M 9154 JEFFERY �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220095 Fl NIELSEN PHILLIP R& LORI � 917LEFFERY AVE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220096 Fl BFlLDWIN BRIAN R& DAWN M 9166 92ND ST 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220097 F1 SHORT10HN11R&KIMM 915692NDST5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220098 F1 MCMORROWJENNY&M�TTHEW 915092NDST5 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2202721220099 Fl HENDRICI60NCURTIS 914492NDST 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230002 F1 SUNDEEN GREG �& SUSAN 1 9137 92ND ST 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230003 F1 BOR�SH D�NIEL 1& KAREN M 9131 92ND ST 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230004 Fl MORG�N C�RRIE F 9125 92ND ST 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230005 Fl DALECOBYJ&LYNNM 911592NDST5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230006 Fl SCH�NKVIRGINI�&WILLIAM 910592NDST 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230007 F1 HILL BRUCE A& KIMBERLEE A 91981�RVI5 AVE 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2202721230008 F1 DONOHUE ROBERTI & ESTELL� M 9143 92ND ST 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230009 F1 METZGERJOSEPHM&PATRICIFl 914992NDST 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230010 Fl HULLTIMOTHYJ 915592NDST 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
22027212300ll F1 SCHRENKLERDORISM 916592NDST 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240016 F1 ANDERSON THOMAS W& SHIRLEY D 9314 JEFFERY �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
Preliminary Assessment Roll
District F1 Pavement Replacement
Parcel ID District Owner Address Units $/Unit Total /Unit
2202721240017 F1 CR�PPS 1�Y LEE 930LEFFERY AVE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240029 F1 REIFFENBERGER MEG�N M 9319 93RD STS 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240030 Fl RO55 SCOTT P& CLAIRE J 9325 93RD ST 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240031 Fl POMEROY ROBERT SCOTT & PAULFl 9343 93RD ST 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240032 Fl DARST FlNDREW T& TAR� B 9357 93RD ST 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2202721240033 F1 MCDONF�LD SCOTT & PFlTRICIA 9379 93RD ST 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240034 F1 RYAN C�THERW E M 9395 93RD ST 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240035 F1 I<IMMEN JESSIC� & BRYAN WITSCHEN 9235 JEFFERY AVE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240036 Fl SUTLIFF MICH�EL V& VALERIE 9247 JEFFERY �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240037 F1 P�LO R�LPH E& BEVERLY 1 9279 JEFFERY �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240038 Fl �HLM�N MICHFlELA & KIMBERLY 5 HOEPNER 9293 JEFFERY AVE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240039 Fl LATTERELL DON�LD & KELLEY 8 932LEFFERY �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240040 F1 TESCHLER DERE & KFlRIN MFlTHIESEN 9323 JEFFERY CT 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240041 F1 ETTEN MICHFlEL D& TONI E 9325 JEFFERY CT 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2202721240042 Fl I<�RNES KEVIN R& JILL 9327 JEFFERY CT 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240043 F1 IMESON ROBERT 9329 JEFFERY CT 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240044 F1 GR�FF THOM�51 & DENISE M 9331 JEFFERY Q 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240045 F1 I<AS� HE�THER & ERIC M 9333 JEFFERY CT 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240046 Fl OLDRE LIS� A& KIRK G 9335 JEFFERY CT 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240047 Fl HELLER KYLE & BRITTFlNY 9337 JEFFERY CT 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240048 F1 CHE� HENG & EAP DAVAN 9339 JEFFERY CT 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2202721240049 F1 B�LLM�N BERN�RD 1R & BERNELDA 9341 JEFFERY CT 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240050 F1 JOHNSON SUSFlN M 9334 93RD ST 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240051 Fl SCHOENHEIDER KEVIN D& SANDY 9336 93RD ST 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240052 F1 P�NEK GEORGE C& S�NDRA S 9388 93RD ST 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240053 F1 THORPE K�RRIE ET�L 9402 93RD ST 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240055 Fl HEIN DEWO & DOROTHY 9140JERGEN BFlY 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240056 Fl PIERRE D�VID E& PATRICIA R 9146 JERGEN B�Y S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240057 F1 NIEM�LA ROBERT & DEBORAH 915LERGEN BAY 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240058 F1 HALIBURTON RICHFlRD T& RENEE D 9158 JERGEN BAY S 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2202721240059 F1 DACK SCOTT T& AUDREY � 9164 JERGEN 8�Y S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240060 F1 SUS�G JOHN R& LISFl � 9170 JERGEN BFlY S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240061 F1 VOGT D�LE F& UTHY A 921LERGEN Q 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240062 F1 WOOD K�TIE L& LUKE P ALBERS 9218 JERGEN CT S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240063 Fl M�RTIN JEFFREY 5& KELLEY � 9224 JERGEN CT 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240064 Fl NEUM�N PAUL1 &IODI L 9230JERGEN CTS 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240065 F1 RUCKER THOMA51 & LIND� L 9236 JERGEN CTS 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2202721240066 F1 B�CKBERG BL�WE R& MI�1 924LERGEN CTS 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240067 F1 ABRAH�M THOMAS & B�RB�RA Fl L 9248 JERGEN CT S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240068 F1 LUKITSCH D�NIEL C& LIS� L 9254 JERGEN CT 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240069 F1 ELTON RODNEY N& ROBIN D 9260 JERGEN CT S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240070 F1 STOLTZ WILLIAM I& CERISSFl � 9266 JERGEN CT 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240071 Fl VOGELLEWIS M& KAYLEEN � 9D2JER6EN CT S 1 53,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240072 Fl LEV�NG RICHARD C& KRISTIN M 9278 JERGEN AVE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240073 F1 CH�LICH MICHAELI & PEGGYI 9279 JERGEN AVE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240074 F1 G�LLOWFlY NICK 928LERGEN AVE S 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2202721240075 F1 CHERVENY-REINI<E BREND�1 9284JERGEN �VE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240076 F1 THORNELLJOSEPH E 1R & LYNSEY R 9290 JERGEN �VE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240077 F1 SWITZER KIRK W& LIS� M 9296 JERGEN �VE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240078 Fl LEE HSU YI 9444 93RD ST S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240079 Fl MCD�NIEL TIMM J& KELLY 9424 93RD ST S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240080 Fl CROOKS MARK W& SUSAN R 9415 93RD ST 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240081 F1 MOONE RON�LD & PoCHFlRD & RHODFl MOONE 9433 93RD ST S 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2202721240101 F1 LARSON CHRISTOPHER & JENNIFER 9285 JERGEN AVE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240102 F1 ROBERT MARK M�N�GEMENT GROUP 9289 JERGEN �VE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240103 F1 WELLSFARGOBANK 9295JERGEN�VES 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240115 F1 B10RNBERG GLEN �& M�RY B 9227 JEFFERY �VE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240116 F1 HOFFM�N URI55� A& K�THRYN SLO�N 9223 JEFFERY �VE 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240117 Fl VORDERBRUGGEN DAVID E& ANDREFl 9219 JEFFERY AVE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240118 Fl SMITH SCOTT � 9215 JEFFERY �VE S 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240ll9 F1 RUSSELL EDWFlRD PHILLIP &KIMDUN & KIMDUNG RUSSELL 9213 JEFFERY �VE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240120 F1 BILOTTA CH�D 921LEFFERY AVE 5 1 $3,031.fi6 $3,031.66
2202721240121 Fl DUI<IC MILl�N & JEANNIE K 9209 JEFFERY �VE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240122 F1 STOCKTON 1R JFlMES R& KATHLEEN 9207 JEFFERY �VE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240123 Fl KOSLO5ICI L�URA 9203 JEFFERY �VE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240124 Fl THOMPSON M�RK �& DEBRA L 9179 JEFFERY �VE 5 1 $3,031.66 $3,031.66
Totals 362 $1,097,460.92
Preliminary Assessment Roll
District F4 Pavement Replacement
Parcel ID District Owner Address Units $/Unit Total /Unit
2202721220036 F4 MER6EN5 VINCENT R& DIANE M 9135 JAREAU AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220037 F4 MORROW SHANNON 9145 JAREAU AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220038 F4 BACON BRADLEY T& I<IMBERLY A 9155 JAREAU AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220049 F4 SENGER LAURENE R 9140JAREAU AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220050 F4 OLSON DEBRA E& JANET L 9150 JAREAU AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220101 F4 JOLLY I<URIAI<OSE & MARIAMMA 9175 JAREAU AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220102 F4 PEDERSON LORI & LAVALLE JEROME 9156 JAREAU AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220103 F4 COMO CHERYL A 9168 JAREAU AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220104 F4 JENNINGS RONALD R& PATRICIA A 9llOJAREAU AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220105 F4 THOR YENG & XIONG VANG 9182 JAREAU AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721220106 F4 EBERT THOMAS J& MARY G 9167 JAREAU AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230012 F4 STANDFIELDJEANETTEB 9204JEFFERYBAY 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230013 F4 CONSTABLE RICHARD C JR & DARLA D SENN 9206 JEFFERY BAY 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230014 F4 LEMAY PAUL W& VALERIE E 9210JEFFERY BAY 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230015 F4 BANASZEWSI<I RICHARD T& ANGELA M SLAVII< 9218 JEFFERY BAY 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230016 F4 BOE DONALD T& LINDA J 9222 JEFFERY BAY 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230017 F4 JOHNSON NICOLE L 9226JEFFERY BAY 5 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230018 F4 WILSON JOHN R& MICHELLE M 9230JEFFERY BAY 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230019 F4 CEI<ALLA DONALD J& JULIE A 9258 JEFFERY AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230020 F4 RAYMOND I<ENT A& NICOLE M 9296 93RD ST 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230021 F4 GEAR ALAN W& I<ATY L 9274 93RD ST 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230022 F4 ROERINGDANIELP 925893RDST 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230023 F4 STEINMETZ ERII< 9287 93RD ST 5 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230024 F4 I<U JOSHUA W& LEE XIONG 9265 93RD ST 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230025 F4 SCHULTZ NOEL P& I<IM M 9374JASMINE AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230026 F4 HOFFMAN STEVEN J& I<IMBERLYA 9396JASMINE AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230027 F4 HALVORSON SUSAN 9412 JASMINE AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230028 F4 ROBERTS SHIRLEY M 9438JASMINE AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230029 F4 JARVIS ERBAYNE W& DEBORAH 5 9454JASMINE AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230030 F4 SEVERSON JOSEPH & ALICIA SEVERSON 9470JASMINE AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230031 F4 HAMILTON EFREM M& TRACIE M 9484JASMINE AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230032 F4 WENNER THOMAS E& I<AREN A 9361 JASMINE AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230033 F4 VENTRELLA DAVID A& WHITNEY- & CLAUDETTE WHITNEY-V 9373 JASMINE AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230034 F4 PETERSON RON R& GAIL CORSON 9385 JASMINE AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230035 F4 LEE DAVID E& MARTHA I 9407 JASMINE AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230036 F4 NASBY I<EITH A 9429JASMINE AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230037 F4 SAUERER PATRIQU & I<ATHRYN 9443 JASMINE AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230038 F4 I<AMNII<AR BRIAN D& I<AREN D 9465 JASMINE AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230039 F4 STACHOWIAI< ROBERT & I<ATHLENE L BROWN 9499JASMINE AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230042 F4 MCCONNELUAMES & SHIREEN 9183 JAREAU AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230043 F4 TALLARICO SEAN P 9191 JAREAU AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230044 F4 MALLINGERJOSHUAJ 9209JAREAUAVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230049 F4 VEESENMEYER ANTHONYJ & NICOLE A MILLS 9194JAREAU AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230050 F4 PETERSON LEON M& LISA M 9206JAREAU AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230051 F4 VROMAN RYAN D& FAYE M 9228 JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230052 F4 RUUDCYNTHIA 9240JARRODAVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230053 F4 ZINS SCOTT W& JEAN I< GARDNER ZWS 9262 JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230054 F4 BERGE JASON & LAURIE 9284JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230055 F4 POMMERENING VWCENTJ & MARY C 9306JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230056 F4 TOPP BRYAN J& CHENILLE J 9328 JARROD AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230057 F4 SCHAFF I<EITH A 9340 JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230058 F4 NEUMANN SCOTT G& SUSAN C 9362 JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230059 F4 I<HAN SHAHRUI<H 9384JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230060 F4 MQ<EA6UE1<ARLT 9406JARRODAVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230061 F4 NELSON I<ENNETH B& I<ARRI C 9428JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230062 F4 BAI<ER PAUL A 9460 JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230063 F4 MURRAY TIMOTHY P JR & LISA I< MURRAY 9482 JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230064 F4 ARCHAMBEAU DONALD A 9255 JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230065 F4 EQ<ES CORY L& PAULINE M 9273 JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230066 F4 CHESLOG BRIAN D& DANIELLE D 9291 JARROD AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230067 F4 MEIER JAMES B& MARY PAT 9319 JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
Preliminary Assessment Roll
District F4 Pavement Replacement
Parcel ID District Owner Address Units $/Unit Total /Unit
2202721230068 F4 BENQ< MANDY J 9337 JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230069 F4 I<ORNMANN ROBBY D 9355 JARROD AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230070 F4 LEYDE MARI< A& I<ATHLEEN M 9373 JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230071 F4 GARCIA DAVID 9391 JARROD AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230072 F4 I<AUL JESSE A& REBECCA L BAHR 9419 JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230073 F4 CLAUSEN MARY I 9437 JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230074 F4 MYERS DENNIS JAMES & JO AN E 9455 JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230075 F4 VIEROW MARI< & PATRICIA 9473 JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230076 F4 SAND WADE I< & NATALIE I< 9477 JARROD AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230077 F4 DAQ<SCOTT T& AUDREY A 9225 JAREAU AVE 5 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230078 F4 SCHWARTZ CARL P& MICHELLE J 9243 JAREAU AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230079 F4 MCDONALD CHARLES M& DEBORAH 9265 JAREAU AVE 5 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230080 F4 ELLIS JANET R 9287 JAREAU AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230081 F4 W ESTON RYAN J& MELISSA L 9289 JAREAU AVE 5 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230082 F4 VOGEL CHAD 9301 JAREAU AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230083 F4 HOLMSTADT GALE & SANDERS & LEILANI I<SANDERS 9323 JAREAU AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230084 F4 DUSH BRADLEY & THERESA 9335 JAREAU AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230085 F4 SCHRANI<LERJAMES P& PAMELA 9357JAREAU AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230086 F4 JUNGWIRTH CYNTHIA L 9389JAREAU AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230087 F4 COLEMAN RYAN J 9411 JAREAU AVE 5 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230088 F4 SYVERSON JEREMY P& ANGELA J 9433 JAREAU AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230089 F4 ANDERSON I<ENNETH L& I<ATHLEEN A ANDERSON 9455 JAREAU AVE 5 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230090 F4 MEDINA LISA R 9477 JAREAU AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230091 F4 VOW ER RICHARD R& JOAN A 9481 JAREAU AVE 5 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230092 F4 WOLI<ERSTORFER RONALD R& LORI 9499JAREAU AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230093 F4 SCHUETH LON D 9238JAREAU AVE 5 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230094 F4 RIEPE WAYNE W& NANCY A 9254 JAREAU AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230095 F4 JOHNSON MICHELLE R 9276JAREAU AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230096 F4 FRANI<LIN LYNETTE G& MICHAEU 9310JAREAU AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230097 F4 GLA55 DENNIS M& AN6EL L 9342 JAREAU AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230098 F4 WACHTLER PAUUOSEPH & CARINA 9364JAREAU AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230099 F4 WILLOWSANDREAA 9376JAREAUAVES 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230100 F4 PRALL MICHAEL T& HEATHER E 9398 JAREAU AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230101 F4 SPIE55 CASEY & MOLLY 9400 JAREAU AVE 5 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230102 F4 NOLAND ELLEN M 9422 JAREAU AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230103 F4 MORGEL MARI< 9444JAREAU AVE 5 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230104 F4 OLSON BRADLEY D& MELISSA I< 9466JAREAU AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230105 F4 CHAVIE SHAWN J 9495 JARROD AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230106 F4 I<ATHLEEN A LUCI<MANN TRS 9491 JARROD AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230107 F4 BRUCE MICHAEL & NANCY CANDY 9489 JARROD AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230108 F4 I<ALIS MATTHEW A& I<ELLY M 9485 JARROD AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230109 F4 BHAI<TA I<IRIT 9484 JARROD AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230110 F4 MUELLNERJOEL&I<RISTINELEMIRE 9486JARRODAVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230111 F4 EDWARDS MICHAEL P JR 9488 JARROD AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230112 F4 I<ORBEL BRENT D& EMILY L 9490 JARROD AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230113 F4 I<LEINSCHMIDT I<EVIN T& LISA M LANCRAIN 9492 JARROD AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230114 F4 ADEREMI-ATA TOYIN M& OLUWOLE A 9496 JARROD AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721230115 F4 STADLER I<EITH M& SARAH A 9498 JARROD AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240015 F4 I<OUBELE BRIAN & SHERYL 9336JEFFERY AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240018 F4 WALI<ERDUSTINJ 9488JEFFERYAVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240019 F4 CONNER BRADLEY C& I<ATHLEEN M 9454JEFFERY AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240020 F4 BUI VU H& TRINH T N6UYEN 9426JEFFERY AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240021 F4 SMITHI<ERI&JASONJELINEI< 9402JEFFERYAVES 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240022 F4 LINDSTROM JON C& TINA M 9370JEFFERY AVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240023 F4 LENZMICHAELG 9358JEFFERYAVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240024 F4 THOMAS BRENDA J& ROBB P 9497 JEFFERY AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240025 F4 ZYWIECJOSEPHJ 9471JEFFERYAVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240026 F4 CARROLL ALONA 9433 JEFFERY AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240027 F4 PEPER GLEN C& SHARI L 9415 JEFFERY AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240028 F4 PLETSCHTHOMA56 9399JEFFERYAVE 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240082 F4 FROSCH STEVEN M& ASHLEY M 9304JERGEN AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
Preliminary Assessment Roll
District F4 Pavement Replacement
Parcel ID District Owner Address Units $/Unit Total /Unit
2202721240083 F4 LARSEN TRACI A I<& WILLIAM D 9316JERGEN AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240084 F4 HAWI<INS CHRISTOPHER J& CHRISTINA A HAWI<INS 9338JER6EN AVE 5 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240085 F4 ANDERSON I<AREN L 9342 JERGEN AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240086 F4 MARSH PETER G& NANETTE L 9352 JER6EN AVE 5 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240087 F4 BUETOWMARI<A&I<IMBERLYA 9374JERGENPLS 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240088 F4 51<IFRNGTON TIMOTHY & JESSICA NATTERSTAD 9382 JER6EN PL 5 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240089 F4 BIEZEJENNAG&TIMOTHYA 9390JERGENPLS 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240090 F4 LOSHEI<ROBERTJ&LAURAI< 9398JERGENPLS 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240091 F4 MII<HAILWALIDA 9406JERGENPLS 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240092 F4 CARRINGTONNATHANT&AMANDAJMARTIN 9416JERGENPLS 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240093 F4 ANDERSON ERIC D& DIANE G 9424 JERGEN PL 5 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240094 F4 BJ01<NE LAUREN & LAVONNE 9432JER6EN PLS 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240095 F4 FIGLMILLERJOAN C&JEFFREYJ 9440JERGEN PLS 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240096 F4 LICHTBLAU JAMES 6& CAROLYN 9448 JER6EN PL 5 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240097 F4 BRANUMSCOTT&JAMIEW 9456JERGENPLS 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240098 F4 DUNCAN AARON L 9464JER6EN PLS 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240099 F4 FLUEGEL MATT W&SHANNON I< 9480JERGEN PLS 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240100 F4 I<OENIGMARYT 9490JER6ENPL5 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240104 F4 GOETZI<E ALESHA I< & ADAM T 9299 JERGEN AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240105 F4 HENSEL BRIAN M& JUANITA A 9307 JER6EN AVE 5 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240106 F4 I<UMMER EDWARD L& MATTHEW S BARRETTE 9313 JERGEN AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240107 F4 WAXLER I<ATHRYN M 9327 JER6EN AVE 5 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240108 F4 NISTLER NATHAN J& ATHENA C 9339JERGEN AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240109 F4 MOONE RONALD P 9347 JER6EN AVE 5 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240110 F4 HANSON SCOTTJ & JANET R 9359JERGEN AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
22027212401ll F4 SCHUHWERCIUEFFRY P& DEBRA P 9365 JERGEN AVE 5 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240112 F4 MARTIN ANTHONY & ROCHELLE 9377 JERGEN AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240113 F4 JOHNSON RYAN B 9483 JER6EN AVE 5 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
2202721240114 F4 W EBER CHELSEY D 9495 JERGEN AVE S 1$3,031.66 $3,031.66
Totals 151 $457,780.66
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Appendix E
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Overview
A visual inspection ��as peiforined in 2013 to evaluate paveinent surface conditions b�- identif�-ing
va�ious pavement defects.
Paveinents can deteriorate at different rates due to in�n�- factors, including: origival construction
procedures, constn�ction materials, traffic voluine, draina�e characteristics, and subseql�ent paveinent
inai�itenance. Due to this, paveinents constructed at the saine tiine ma�� not deteriorate at the saine rate
and ina�- have different useful lives.
It should be noted that not �ll p�vements �vith the same or similar PCI �� look eiactl�� the same.
Various t�pes and ainounts of distress contribute to a particular PCI rating. Identif�-ing the cause of the
distress (lo�d related vs. non-load related) is unportant in understanding the current pavement condition
and potential rehabilitation inethods. In lddition, seginents of the s�ine street ma�- in vai in condition
and a representative rating for the inajorit5- of the seginent is deterinined.
Generall�- spealcing, paveinents deteriorate slo��lv over the first ten �-ears and then tend to deteriorate
inore quicl�l�T. As paveinent ages and surface crlcicing occurs, additional inoisture is able to enter the
paveinent structure and accelerate deterioration. Early preventative maintenance can eitend the life of
pa�einent b�r protectinb the paveinent st�ucture froin the effects of inoisture and �veathering. If a
paveinent is left «ithol�t maintenance, the paveinent condition can deteriorate vei rapidl�T to��ards the
end of the lifec�-cle. Tlus deterioration is illustrated in the follo«ing figure fi the Cit�-'s 1994
Paveinent Manageinent Plan:
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Figure E1- PCI vs Age
!�Ul��E�R '� �� �A�. �+D�J €] I 7 � �D�1
m �AT f�! F�Afi I NG [;R��' V h�
.�—,
�
�
F°°
C�
�
�
TY� I�A a,I�A C fi+1T�#�A�l��
,I��1�1BER �A�' I h� �_.
� �tf}-e.�_���4�� . ���/� i n . Ft .
� �� �
�xc� � i��� ��� .
��
—g� �
@����flt� tn�; T�P i �� �
�aYe iltgAe or
��� rco dlstra��s. '�+��
594� C4�k
Yery �t+ead �`
�
Pat+e�rv�n�s tk��ot ho�+e \
.-.°�(� � �i�r�ifleflni lev�l �'�
�f di�tres�. �
` nesn-9[sod �el�#�d, 'o
[�csod �
--�j�' F�vernen#s Gh�# �+�++� '�
c� �ignl#itank leuel �,
�,} � of di�Ct�S3, �
I '€�,� I�d' related, '�
�— �v�rl�y
�
W
� ��
s�
�
� �
� ,� 4� °
� �'
I
I —" � �
�
— �
�� i r
f PQ�"
�qaem.�nt� t�t�� hKtw�C
Iftq�4F ��S�fGS�.
�
,
�e r y P�a� �'a wer�snt s t h€�# h4u�
&t.�ill a kCO�ilf C]�'1I��4UPlk$
afi m�jur dist���a,
F�a i d esd
�
�
�'� �����s)
�t���� L�f�
{ �z. z�3� � �o�
3
��
�l
�4
�
�
�
� $9 0. {}��S3L}. C14�
€2��4n�tr�eklon `'+, �(�4i7.ffi��7S.0+�j
�
�
��
�
��
.
s. I
f �o ��
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Appendix F
Pavement Cores
Paveinent Cores «ere e�tracted to deterinine the thickness of the eiisting street section and evaluate
paveinent condition.
Based on the condition of the cores, ��-e selected t��o eitremes for an initial comparison b�- FWD analysis.
Both roads ���ere built during a sunilar tunefraine (1993 and 1994) and should have similar traffic. With
a ininor eiception, the baciccalculated inodulus of the bituminous la�-er (El) is inuch higher ��here the
la�-er is intact (Jergen B1�-, Core 15) than «here top-do�tin stripping/raveling is obseived and additional
stripping «as noted throughout the core (Jeffi Court. Core 17).
Core 15 — Jergen Bay
Layer Modulus (ksi)
Station Bituminous AbBaseate Subgrade Value
0 4�9 43 18 30
118 411 �4 18 30
226 47� 36 20 33
309 683 9 31 �4
429 17J 19 3J 62
Core 17 — Jeffery Court
Layer Modulus (ksi)
Station Bituminous �gBaseate Subgrade Value
0 200 �3 31 54
106 2�1 39 26 4�
205 I 2�7 I 61 I 37 I 65
297 282 �6 39 69
Cottage
� Grove
� Pride andPCOSPerity Meet
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Pavement Core #1�: Jer�en Ba�T S, core uitact.
_�,� -
- -- _- , r
�� ,z - � ,
� _ _ :. � � , �%i��. ^ :'�� �� ) _
Pai�ement Core # 17: Jeffer� Ct. core brolcen, severe stripping at top of core, eitending entire depth.
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Appendix G
Falling Weight Deflectometer
Cottage
� Grove
� Pride andPCOSPerity Meet
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project
Report of Pavement Testing and Repair
Recommendations
Various City Streets
Cottage Grove, Minnesota
Prepared for
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Professional Certification:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report
was prepared by me or under my direct supervision
and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer
under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Matthew S. Oman, PE
Associate / Senior Enginee
License Number: 43893
December 9, 2013
Project SP-13-06655
������� S ' � , ���i���
��
� � �
�
pROF ���'
� � �O�
�` � ..�- 5 '
.
......... �
r ������ OF M�N?`�````.
��ui�un►u��►��
Braun Intertec Corporation
_-- -_ -=- . _ _-_�='��-
December 9, 2013
Mr. Michael Boex
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
2035 County Road D East, Suite B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Braun Intertec Corporation phone: 6 5 1 •487•3 2 45
i826 Buerkle Road Fax: 6gi.48�.i8i2
Saint Paul, MN 55iio Web: braunintertec.com
Project SP-13-06655
Re: Report of Pavement Testing and Repair Recommendations
Various City Streets
Cottage Grove, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Boex:
We are pleased to present this Pavement Testing Report for various Cottage Grove streets. The purpose
of the testing was to characterize the existing base and subgrade and to evaluate the strength of the in-
place pavement should a mill-and-overlay be performed.
Please see the attached report for a detailed discussion on the test results and our recommendations.
The report should be read in its entirety.
Thank you for making Braun Intertec your pa�ement consultant for this project. If you have questions
about this report, or if there are other services that we can provide in support of our work to date, please
call Amy Grothaus at 651.261.7122.
Sincerely,
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION
a
�l
.
Amy J. Groth
Senior Project Manager/Engineer
Matthew S. Oman, PE
Associate/Senior Engineer
Pavement Testing Report
.t�.�`�; �(�]E �aa+icli�z� ��ar�aneering �nci �n�ria�nr�aenEal �vFx�[ac�ats �ince �9�'7
Table of Contents
Description
A . I ntroduction ..................................................................................
A.1. Project Description ..........................................................
A.2. Purpose ............................................................................
A.3. Background Information and Reference Documents......
A.4. Scope of Services .............................................................
B. Results ..........................................................................................
B.1. Pavement Core and Hand Auger Results ........................
B.2. FWD Data Tabulations .....................................................
B.3. FWD Results ....................................................................
C. Basis for Recommendations .........................................................
C.1. Design Details ..................................................................
C.1.a. Potential Pavement Repairs ...............................
C.1.b. Current Traffic ....................................................
C.1.c. Anticipated Grade Changes ................................
C.1.d. Precautions Regarding Changed Information ....
C.2. Design and Construction Considerations ........................
C.2.a. Pavement History ...............................................
D. Recommendations .......................................................................
D.1.a. Pavement Repair ................................................
D.1.b. Design Sections ..................................................
E. Procedures ....................................................................................
E.1. Pavement Coring and Hand Augers ................................
E.2. Falling Weight Deflectometer .........................................
E.2.a. Field Testing .......................................................
E.2.b. Deflection Data Analysis .....................................
E.2.b.1. Input Data ..............................................
E.2.b.2. Adjustment Factors ...............................
E.2.b.3. Analyses .................................................
F. Qualifications ..................
F.1. Use of Report.....
F.2. Standard of Care
Appendix A— Core Location SI<etch
Appendix B— Detailed FWD Results
Appendix C — Modulus Summary
..................
..................
Page
......1
......1
......1
......1
......1
...... 2
...... 2
......4
......4
......9
......9
......9
......9
......9
....10
....10
....10
....10
....10
....11
....12
....12
....12
....12
....12
....12
....13
....13
....14
....14
....14
A. Introduction
A.1. Project Description
This Pavement Evaluation Report addresses approximately 4.8 miles of bituminous City streets. The
evaluation of the above streets included pavement coring and hand augers, followed by Falling Weight
Deflectometer (FWD) testing.
A.2. Purpose
The purpose of the testing was to characterize the existing base and subgrade and to evaluate the
strength of the in-place pavement should a mill-and-overlay be performed.
A.3. Background Information and Reference Documents
To facilitate our evaluation, we were provided with or reviewed the following information or documents:
■ A project location map, provided by Bolton & Menl<, Inc (Bolton & Menl<).
■ Pavement core and hand auger data provided by Bolton & Menk, and conducted by Northern
Technologies, Inc. (NTI).
■ Aerial maps available from Google Earth.
■ Traffic data and construction history data provided by Bolton & Menk.
■ Soil maps available from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Web Soil
Su rvey.
A.4. Scope of Services
Our scope of services for this project was submitted as a Proposal to Mr. Michael Boex, dated October 4,
2013. We received authorization to proceed on October 22, 2013. Our scope of services was performed
under the terms of our September 1, 2013, General Conditions. Tasks performed in accordance with our
authorized scope of services included:
� �� � ��-�' �°�
II�TERTEC
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Project SP-13-06655
December 9, 2013
Page 2
■ Performing pavement coring and hand augers on project area streets not previously cored.
This included the southern 1.3 miles (the northern 3.5 miles was cored by NTI).
■ Performing Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) testing on 4.8 miles of city streets at an
approximate test interval of one test every 100 feet.
■ Preparing this report containing a project location sketch, a summary of all pavement core
and hand auger results, FWD deflection data and analysis results, including spring load
capacity (tons per axle), subgrade R-value, granular equivalency, and layer modulus. Also
included is a discussion regarding the strength of the in-place pavement should a mill-and-
overlay be performed.
B. Results
B.1. Pavement Core and Hand Auger Results
Exploration locations 1 through 14 were performed by NTI and locations 15 through 24 were performed
by Braun Intertec. All locations are shown on the attached sketch. For locations 15 through 24, the
bituminous and aggregate base layer thicknesses were measured in the field. Thickness data for
locations 1 through 14 was provided to us by Bolton & Menk, Inc. On average, the streets had
approximately 3.6 inches of bituminous overlying 7.6 inches of aggregate base material. A summary of
the data is provided in Table 1 and was used in the analysis of the FWD data.
Cores 15 through 24 were returned to our office and were examined to assess bituminous material
conditions. Conditions were also reviewed with Bolton & Menk staff. Material stripping or loss of
material was observed in several of the cores. For the most part, this phenomenon was confined to the
upper 1 to 2 inches of the core in the bituminous wear course; however, in some instances, stripping was
present in both the wear and non-wear courses. In several of the cores, the material loss had
deteriorated to the point of causing a separation or breal< in the upper 1/2 to 2 inches of the core, as
noted in the Table.
�����
I NTE RTEC
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Project SP-13-06655
December 9, 2013
Page 3
Where present, this loss of material may diminish the life of an applied maintenance treatment,
depending on the extent and severity of the stripping. Bituminous layers with low-severity stripping can
often support pavement overlays, while more severe stripping may present problems during
construction (such as the milling train breaking through the bituminous layer on thin pavements) and
reduced support for overlays over the long term.
Table 1. Bituminous Core and Hand Auger Results
Bituminous Aggregate Base
Location Street Thickness (in) Thickness (in) Core Condition/Notes
1* 91st Street S 4.00 6.00 Stripping in upper 1.5 inches of core
2* Janero Ave S 3.25 6.50 Good condition
3* Jareau Ave S 3.75 10.50 Stripping in upper 2.0 inches of core
4* Jasmine Ave S 4.50 8.00 Good condition
5* Jeffrey Ave S 4.25 7.00 Core broken; stripping throughout entire core
6* Jensen Ave S 3.75 10.25 Good condition
7* Jergen Ave S 3.00 8.00 Good condition
8* Jarvis Ave S 3J5 8.00 Stripping in upper 2.0 inches of core
9* Jeffrey Ave S 4.50 9.00 Stripping in upper 2.0 inches of core
10* Jergen Court S 3.75 5.50 Good condition
11* Jergen Ave S 3.25 7.75 Core broken; stripping throughout entire core
12* Jeffrey Ave S 3.75 8.00 Stripping in upper 2.5 inches of core
13* 93rd Street S 3.25 7.50 Core broken; stripping throughout entire core
14* 93rd Street S 3.25 6.25 Stripping in upper 2.0 inches of core
15 Jergen Bay 3.75 6.75 Good condition
16 92nd Street 238 7.13 Stripping in lower 1.0 inch of core
17 Jeffrey Court 4.00 6.00 Core broken; stripping throughout entire core
18 Jareau Ave S 3.13 8.88 Stripping throughout entire core
19 Jareau Ave S 3.25 7.25 Core broken at top; stripping throughout entire core
20 Jarrod Ave S 3.00 9.00 Stripping in upper 1.5 inches of core
21 Jasmine Ave S 3.50 8.00 Core broken at top; stripping in upper 2.0 inches of
�����
I NTE RTEC
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Project SP-13-06655
December 9, 2013
Page 4
Bituminous Aggregate Base
Location Street Thickness (in) Thickness (in) Core Condition/Notes
core
22 Jeffrey Ave S 3.13 7.38 Core broken at top; stripping throughout entire core
23 Jergen Place 4.25 6.25 Stripping throughout entire core
24 Jergen Ave S 3.50 7.50 Good condition
Average 3.6 7.5
*Cores 1 through 14 were performed by NTI.
B.2. FWD Data Tabulations
A summary of the deflection data is available in Appendix B. For all tested routes, spring load capacity,
effective GE, and effective subgrade R-value are shown.
Section E.3.b.3 provides a summary of the data analysis methods used to obtain the above information.
Included in Appendix C are backcalculation results using the Evaluation of Layer Moduli and Overlay
Design (ELMOD) analysis tool. The ELMOD tool provides a layer modulus (kips per square inch) for each
of the pavement layers by analyzing the pavement's response from the FWD.
B.3. FWD Results
The deflection data analysis results are statistical estimates representing values calculated for the test
locations along the roadway. The MnDOT TONN method is a conservative approach to assessing load
capacity. The method takes the 15th percentile of spring-load capacity values (given in tons per axle) for
a given segment of roadway, which means that 85 percent of the test points have a load capacity higher
than the presented values. Effective R-value and GE use the same standard.
Table 2 provides a summary of the input data provided for each test route. Thickness data was obtained
from the bituminous core and hand auger results and traffic data was provided by Bolton & Menk. For
streets that were not cored, construction history and proximity to cored streets were used to provide
likely assumed thicknesses.
�����
I NTE RTEC
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Project SP-13-06655
December 9, 2013
Page 5
Table 3 summarizes the results for each of the roadways using ELMOD. Bituminous layer moduli ranged
from 118 to 980; aggregate base moduli ranged from 24 to 65; and subgrade layer moduli ranged from
10 to 33. For those streets that were not cored, the assumed thickness data may have attributed to the
high moduli results. Given the testing rate, variability in the raw and processed data is possible.
The overlay requirement provided in Table 3 is the equivalent bituminous thicl<ness that is required for
20 years of the anticipated traffic. This is what is needed to prevent failure-level fatigue (bituminous) or
rutting (aggregate base/subgrade). Since most values are 0.0, the structural demand is generally very
minor for the given traffic levels. In this case, functional issues, such as materials problems and
associated surface distresses, are more lil<ely to occur. R-values provided in the table were converted
from the resilient modulus using ELMOD.
Table 2. FWD Input Data
Core Data
Core Data Aggregate Aggregate
Bituminous Base Bituminous Base
Length Thickness Thickness Thickness Thickness
Street From To (ft) AADT (in) (in) (in) (in)
91st Street S Cul
91st Street S Cul de sac 95 300 -- -- 4.00 6.00
de sac, West
91st Street S Cul
91st Street S Cul de sac 107 300 -- -- 4.00 6.00
de sac, East
91st Street S Islay Ave S Jareau Ave S 1401 500 4.00 6.00 4.00 6.00
92nd Street S Jergen Ave S Cul de sac 176 300 238 7.13 2.38 7.13
92nd Street S Jarvis Ave S Jeffrey Ave S 612 300 -- -- 3.75 10.50
93rd Street S Jareau Ave S Jasmine Ave S 320 300 -- -- 3.50 8.00
3.25 7.50
93rd Street S Jeffrey Court Jergen Ave S 818 300 3.25 6.88
3.25 6.25
Janero Ave S 91st Street S 90th Street S 697 500 3.25 6.50 3.25 6.50
Jareau Ave S Cul
Jareau Ave S Cul de sac 194 300 -- -- 3.75 10.50
de sac
Jareau Ave S 90th Street S 91st Street S 510 1700 3.75 10.50 3.75 10.50
Jareau Ave S 91st Street S Dead End 2326 1700 3.13 8.88 3.19 8.06
�����
I NTE RTEC
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Project SP-13-06655
December 9, 2013
Page 6
Core Data
Core Data Aggregate Aggregate
Bituminous Base Bituminous Base
Length Thickness Thickness Thickness Thickness
Street From To (ft) AADT (in) (in) (in) (in)
3.25 7.25
Jareau Ave S Jareau Ave S
Jarrod Ave S 1378 300 3.00 9.00 3.00 9.00
(North) (South)
Jarvis Ave S 91st Street S 92nd Street S 583 300 3.75 8.00 3.75 8.00
Jasmine Ave S
Jasmine Ave S Cul de sac 209 300 -- -- 4.55 8.00
Cul de sac West
Jasmine Ave S
Jasmine Ave S Cul de sac 83 300 -- -- 4.50 8.00
Cul de sac East
Jasmine Ave S Dead End Jeffrey Ave S 715 500 3.50 8.00 3.50 8.00
Jasmine Ave S 90th Street S Cul de sac 1207 500 4.50 8.00 4.50 8.00
Jeffrey Ave S Cul
Jeffrey Ave S Cul de sac 161 300 -- -- 4.50 9.00
de sac (2)
Jeffrey Ave S Cul
Jeffrey Ave S Cul de sac 104 300 - - 4.25 7.00
de sac (3)
Jeffrey Ave S Cul
Jeffrey Ave S Cul de sac 24 300 -- -- 4.50 9.00
de sac (1)
Jeffrey Ave S 93rd Street S Dead End 420 1700 3.13 7.38 3.13 738
4.25 7.00
Jeffrey Ave S 90th Street S Jeffrey Court 2259 1700 4.50 9.00 4.20 8.00
3.75 8.00
Jeffrey Bay Jeffrey Ave S Cul de sac 92 300 -- -- 3.75 8.00
Jeffrey Court Jeffrey Ave S Cul de sac 297 300 4.00 6.00 4.00 6.00
Jensen Ave S Jeffrey Ave S 90th Street S 1200 500 3J5 10.25 3.75 10.25
Jergen Ave S 93rd Street S Dead End 714 1700 3.50 7.50 3.50 7.50
Jergen Ave Cul de
Jergen Ave S Cul de sac 38 300 -- -- 3.00 8.00
sac
Jergen Ave S Jergen Bay S 90th Street S 1118 1700 3.00 8.00 3.00 8.00
Jergen Bay S Jergen Ave S Cul de sac 429 300 3J5 6.75 3.75 6.75
Jergen Court S Jergen Ave S Cul de sac 329 300 3J5 5.50 3.75 5.50
�����
I NTE RTEC
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Project SP-13-06655
December 9, 2013
Page 7
Core Data
Core Data Aggregate Aggregate
Bituminous Base Bituminous Base
Length Thickness Thickness Thickness Thickness
Street From To (ft) AADT (in) (in) (in) (in)
Jergen Place Jergen Ave S Cul de sac 345 300 4.25 6.25 4.25 6.25
Janie Ave S 91st Street S 90th Street S 748 500 -- -- 3.25 6.50
Jergen Ave S 93rd Street S Jergen Bay S 907 1700 3.25 7.75 3.25 7.75
91st Street S Jareau Ave S Jeffrey Ave S 1220 500 -- -- 4.25 9.20
Table 3. ELMOD FWD Results
Bituminous Aggregate Subgrade Overlay
Layer Modulus Base Layer Layer Requirement
Street From To R-Value (E1) Modulus (E2) Modulus (E3) (in)
91st Street S Cul
91st Street S Cul de sac 34 268 45 20 0.0
de sac, West
91st Street S Cul
91st Street S Cul de sac 33 341 43 20 0.0
de sac, East
91st Street S Islay Ave S Jareau Ave S 29 406 65 17 0.0
91st Street S Jareau Ave S Jeffrey Ave S 36 545 32 21 0.1
92nd Street S Jergen Ave S Cul de sac 38 359 32 22 03
92nd Street S Jarvis Ave S Jeffrey Ave S 37 760 30 21 0.2
Jasmine Ave
93rd Street S Jareau Ave S S 43 371 47 25 0.0
93rd Street S Jeffrey Court Jergen Ave S 51 337 59 29 0.0
Janero Ave S 91st Street S 90th Street S 32 522 41 19 0.2
Jareau Ave S Cul
Jareau Ave S Cul de sac 35 807 33 20 0.0
de sac
Jareau Ave S 90th Street S 91st Street S 41 566 32 24 0.1
Jareau Ave S 91st Street S Dead End 42 520 42 24 03
Jareau Ave S Jareau Ave S
Jarrod Ave S 54 495 51 31 0.0
(North) (South)
�����
I NTE RTEC
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Project SP-13-06655
December 9, 2013
Page 8
Bituminous Aggregate Subgrade Overlay
Layer Modulus Base Layer Layer Requirement
Street from To R-Value (E1) Modulus (E2) Modulus (E3) (in)
Jarvis Ave S 91st Street S 92nd Street S 37 325 47 21 0.0
Jasmine Ave S Cul
Jasmine Ave S Cul de sac 32 238 26 19 0.0
de sac West
Jasmine Ave S Cul
Jasmine Ave S Cul de sac 16 631 38 10 0.0
de sac East
Jasmine Ave S Dead End Jeffrey Ave S 54 206 48 31 0.0
Jasmine Ave S 90th Street S Cul de sac 30 285 24 17 0.1
Jeffrey Ave S Cul
Jeffrey Ave S Cul de sac 41 183 27 24 0.0
de sac (2)
Jeffrey Ave S Cul
Jeffrey Ave S Cul de sac 44 469 45 25 0.0
de sac (3)
Jeffrey Ave S Cul
Jeffrey Ave S Cul de sac 35 321 42 21 0.0
de sac (1)
Jeffrey Ave S 93rd Street S Dead End 51 236 55 29 0.1
Jeffrey Ave S 90th Street S Jeffrey Court 52 331 42 30 0.1
Jeffrey Bay Jeffrey Ave S Cul de sac 43 118 32 25 0.0
Jeffrey Court Jeffrey Ave 5 Cul de sac 58 245 50 33 0.0
Jensen Ave S Jeffrey Ave S 90th Street S 42 915 26 24 0.4
Jergen Ave S 93rd Street S Dead End 40 372 39 23 0.6
Jergen Ave Cul de
Jergen Ave S Cul de sac 25 980 28 15 0.1
sac
Jergen Ave S 93rd Street S Jergen Bay S 46 443 39 26 0.5
Jergen Ave S Jergen Bay S 90th Street S 49 764 29 28 1.0
Jergen Bay S Jergen Ave S Cul de sac 42 440 32 24 0.2
Jergen Court S Jergen Ave S Cul de sac 32 198 48 19 0.0
Jergen Place Jergen Ave S Cul de sac 55 246 24 32 0.2
Janie Ave S 91st Street S 90th Street S 34 455 64 20 0.0
�����
I NTE RTEC
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Project SP-13-06655
December 9, 2013
Page 9
C. Basis for Recommendations
C.1. Design Details
C.1.a. Potential Pavement Repairs
Based on our discussions with Bolton & Menk and the variable conditions of the streets within the
project area, for ease of construction and equipment mobilization, we recommend that full-removal of
the existing bituminous be performed on the tested streets. This is based on a number of factors and
concerns regarding mill-and-overlay including:
■ Several of the locations were observed to have material stripping throughout the entire core
in both the bituminous wear and non-wear courses. Due to the condition of the bituminous
layers, there is a possibility that the remaining in-place bituminous will not support
construction equipment.
■ It is possible that underlying bituminous layers that exhibit stripping will negatively affect the
life of the overlay.
■ Bolton & Menk performed several test mills in the project area. These areas were found to
be very thin and were easily broken apart.
■ The City's Public Works Department has had to perform numerous spot repairs throughout
the project area. There is a good possibility that the underlying distresses will reflect
through the new bituminous overlay.
C.1.b. Current Traffic
Traffic data was provided by Bolton & Menk and is shown in Table 2.
C.1.c. Anticipated Grade Changes
We expect that grade changes will be minimal for this project.
�����
I NTE RTEC
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Project SP-13-06655
December 9, 2013
Page 10
C.1.d. Precautions Regarding Changed Information
We have attempted to describe our understanding of the proposed issues to the extent they were
reported to us by Bolton & Menk. Depending on the extent of available information, assumptions may
have been made based on our experience with similar projects. If we have not correctly recorded or
interpreted the project details, we should be notified. New or changed information could require
additional evaluation, analyses and/or recommendations.
C.2. Design and Construction Considerations
C.2.a. Pavement History
Based on the information provided, the tested streets were constructed between 1979 and 1997 and
vary between 16 and 34 years in age. Since that time, we understand that the streets have had frequent
localized maintenance performed on them that includes patching and cracl< filling. The City is currently
seal coating streets using a seven-year cycle. We understand that the tested streets have all been seal
coated at least once, with some having been seal coated multiple times. To date, none of the tested
streets have received a major repair, such as an overlay.
We did not review condition data as part of this project; however, we understand that the tested streets
likely have multiple distresses that are being concealed by the seal coat treatments.
Given the age of the pavements and the likely distresses, we assume that most of the streets are within
the major repair maintenance category. Pavements in this category are likely beyond benefitting from
further preventive maintenance. Additionally, without repair, pavements within this repair category can
deteriorate rapidly into the reconstruction category. Restoring these pavements now will be more cost-
effective than further prolonging maintenance.
D. Recommendations
D.1.a. Pavement Repair
We recommend the full removal of the existing bituminous pavement over the entire project area to the
top of the aggregate base. This type of treatment can be expected to last about 15 to 20 years while
reusing in-place materials and eliminating the potential for reflective cracking in the bituminous layers.
V�����d
I NTE RTEC
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Project SP-13-06655
December 9, 2013
Page 11
Performing a full removal of the existing bituminous pavement will eliminate the potential for
construction issues with milling. It also provides the benefit of fully removing the stripped bituminous
layers and the potential for future issues.
Following removal of the bituminous pavement, we recommended that the in-place aggregate be
regraded and compacted. Following compaction, the aggregate base should be proof rolled to check for
the presence of localized weal< areas. The proofroll should be performed with a fully loaded truck. The
proofroll should be observed by a geotechnical engineer or qualified observer. Any detected weak areas
should be corrected prior to the placement of the new bituminous pavement.
D.1.b. Design Sections
For the residential streets with a reported ADT of 300 to 500, the projected 20-year Bituminous
Equivalent Single Axle Loads (BESAL) ranges from approximately 31,000 to 56,000 ESALs. The average R-
value derived from FWD testing for these streets is 38. For these sections, the average in-place
pavement section includes 3.8 inches of bituminous overlying 7.6 to 8.0 inches of aggregate base. Using
this projected traffic and an R-value of 38, the required granular equivalency (GE) is approximately 10.0
inches. Following full removal of the existing bituminous pavement on these streets, a design section of
3.5 inches of new bituminous is recommended as per the minimum required bituminous. This follows
the City's standard for residential streets. Underlying the bituminous is approximately 7.6 to 8.0 inches
of existing aggregate base. Assuming the in-place aggregate base performs as a newly placed base layer,
a GE of 15.88 inches is provided.
For streets with a reported ADT of 1,700, the projected 20-year BESALs is approximately 181,000 and the
average R-value derived from FWD testing is 45. For these sections, the average in-place pavement
section indudes 3.5 inches of bituminous overlying 8.1 inches of aggregate base. The required GE for
these streets is 10.14 inches. Following full removal of the existing bituminous pavement on these
streets, the City's standard design section of 3.5 inches of new bituminous is recommended, overlying
approximately 8.1 inches of existing aggregate base. Assuming the in-place aggregate base performs as a
newly placed base layer, a GE of 15.88 inches is provided.
The above designs are based on a 20-year performance life. This performance life assumes maintenance,
such as sealcoating and crack sealing, is routinely performed. The actual pavement life will vary
depending on variations in weather, traffic conditions and maintenance.
V�����d
I NTE RTEC
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Project SP-13-06655
December 9, 2013
Page 12
E. Procedures
E.1. Pavement Coring and Hand Augers
Core locations 15 through 24 were selected by Bolton & Menl<and were conducted by Braun Intertec on
October 11, 2013. All cores were performed using a 4-inch core barrel and the bituminous pavement
was repaired with a cold-mix bituminous patch immediately after coring. The cores were measured to
obtain approximate bituminous thickness and their material conditions were noted based on visual
observation.
E.2. Falling Weight Deflectometer
E.2.a. Field Testing
A Dynatest Model 8002E FWD was used for deflection testing. This equipment is a trailer-mounted
device that measures the pavement deflection due to an applied impulse load. Four impulse loads were
applied at each test point in a single direction of travel at an approximate interval of 100 feet.
Field testing was conducted on October 9, 2013. Data collected by the FWD during testing include the
deflections, impulse loads, pavement surface temperature, and the ambient air temperature.
E.2.b. Deflection Data Analysis
E.2.b.1. Input Data
The following data are utilized as analysis inputs to generate structural information from the deflection
data:
■ Traffic loadings (provided by Bolton & Menk)
■ Pavement layer thicl<nesses (core and hand auger data, provided by NTI and Braun Intertec)
■ Subgrade soil type (Braun Intertec)
■ Pavement temperatures (Braun Intertec)
■ Previous day temperature (National Weather Service)
■ Pavement deflection data (Braun Intertec)
�����
I NTE RTEC
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Project SP-13-06655
December 9, 2013
Page 13
E.2.b.2. Adjustment Factors
Flexible pavement systems consisting of bituminous layers, aggregate bases, and subgrade soils, are
normally frozen during winter and very weak during spring thaw. Deflection testing is normally not
recommended during either season. Measured deflections in summer and fall seasons are adjusted to
reflect spring season condition when the pavement system is in its weakest state. Seasonal correction
factors recommended by MnDOT are used for this purpose.
Deflection is inversely proportional to the stiffness of flexible pavements. Since stiffness in flexible
pavements is temperature dependent, measured deflections are adjusted to the standard 80 degrees
Fahrenheit for deflection data analysis using MnDOT procedure. The FWD equipment is equipped with
an infrared temperature sensor for measuring pavement surface temperature. Using the BELLS model
developed from FHWA-LTPP test sections, the mid-depth asphalt temperature is estimated from the
surface temperature and previous day average air temperature. The resulting factor is used to convert
the calculated mid-depth temperature to the standard 80 degrees Fahrenheit mid-depth temperature.
The Temperature Adjustment Factor (TAF) and Seasonal Correction Factor (SCF) are then used to adjust
the measured deflection to an equivalent spring season deflection at the reference temperature of 80F.
E.2.b.3. Analyses
The Braun Intertec Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) program was used for analysis of the deflection data to
estimate the effective subgrade R-value and the effective GE. NDT incorporates flexible pavement
thickness design relationships from MnDOT, along with those from the 1993 Guide forDesign of
PavementStructures, published by AASHTO. The following briefly defines the parameters presented in
this report:
TONN Sprin� Load Capacity - The MnDOT TONN method (revised from MnDOT Investigation 603) is used
for spring load capacity estimations. The TONN method uses pavement section information (bituminous
thickness), FWD center deflections (normalized to 9 kips), and seasonal and temperature adjustment
factors to provide an estimate of load capacity for a given pavement segment.
Effective R-value - Effective R-value provides a measure of the stiffness of the pavement subgrade soil.
R-value calculations are computed using the Hogg Model, which represents the subgrade as a soil mass
of finite depth over a stiff layer. Hogg Model resilient modulus values are corrected for seasonal effects
and for congruence to backcalculated resilient modulus values, and finally converted to R-value by the
method described in MnDOT Investigation 201.
V�����d
I NTE RTEC
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Project SP-13-06655
December 9, 2013
Page 14
Because Hogg Model-calculated R-values are relatively conservative compared to methods where an
infinite half-space is considered, and seasonal adjustments are also used, we make no further reduction
of the results for design purposes.
Effective Granular Equivalent (GE) - Effective GE provides values for the design of pavement structures in
inches of MnDOT Class 5 aggregate base equivalent. GE requirements are based upon anticipated 20-
year traffic loadings (ESALs) and the effective R-value of the subgrade.
Laver Moduli - To estimate pavement layer moduli, we used the ELMOD backcalculation software from
Dynatest, Inc. Moduli values were backcalculated for a three-layer system by the Deflection Basin Fit
method. This method uses Odemark-Boussinesq equations to fit the measured deflection basin to
that a theoretical pavement system using set convergence criteria. The overlay requirements are
then calculated using these layer stiffnesses, ESAL estimates and rutting or fatigue failure criteria
provided in ELMOD.
We converted the subgrade moduli values to R-value using relationships established by AASHTO. Note
that the raw backcalculated moduli presented in the report are not corrected for air and pavement
temperature at the time of testing or seasonal variation, and the results could vary considerably if testing
takes places during other seasons or times-of-day. Overlay requirements, however, do account for
seasonal variation of pavement moduli.
F. Qualifications
F.1. Use of Report
This report is for the exclusive use of the parties to which it has been addressed. Without written
approval, we assume no responsibility to other parties regarding this report. Our evaluation, analyses
and recommendations may not be appropriate for other parties or projects.
F.2. Standard of Care
In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under
similar circumstances by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality. No
warranty, express or implied, is made.
� ���
I NTE RTEC
Appendix A
BI�AL�W
I NTE RTE�
�� I C�""i I I ---
� I; � �
� �� �
� 07
� � � �
C�
- J'� �
Q BITUA4INOUS CORE �
(ADDITIONAL) �� � ]
Q BITUA4INOUS CORE
(PREVIOUSLY CONIPLETED BY NTI) �
� CUNSTRUCTED1979
CONSTRUCTED1387
CONSTRUCTED1988
CONSTRUCTED1989
CUNSTRUCTED1390
� CONSTRUCTED 1393
CONSTRUCTED1994
� CONSTRUCTED1997
N
150' 0 300'
SCALE: 1" = 300'
\ \
- _-�z -
,
- � ����, , �
� , � ;� ,
. n � , e ` ��� �� i�' �� �'
� �� � �
�
� ,.,'
, - \;�
� � l— —
O�
�' � �\
� ,' � �— Os � /
i ;� � �— _ �� —, �
� � �� ��� � � . . � _
i � , �,
.. �� /.. � !- �
9 � � �v 5
o � �� �
�� �
� _. _ � , ���� ��
-
� . �. Qi 73
� � °�.. -��r�
y '�1
�
Appendix B
eaauN
I NT� RTEC
Braun Intertec City of Cottage Grove FWD Summary SP-13-06655
Agg Spring Load
Bit Thickness Thickness Design Date Previous Capacity
Roadway From To Length (ft) AADT (in) (in) HCADT Lane ESAL Tested Day Temp (tons/axle) R-value GE
91stStreet5 Islay Ave S Jareau Ave S 1401 500 4 6 19.5 5 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 21.20 18.26
91st Street S Jasmine Ave S Jeffrey Ave S 479 500 4.5 9 19.5 5 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 14.89 19.80
91st Street S Jarvis Ave S Jasmine Ave S 610 500 4.5 8 19.5 5 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 13.91 19.29
91st Street S Jareau Ave S Jarvis Ave S 192 500 3.75 10.5 19.5 5 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 18.25 22.77
91st Street S East Cul de sac 91st Street S Cul de sac 107 300 4 6 11.7 3 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 18.71 20.35
91st Street S West Cul de sac 91st Street S Cul de sac 95 300 4 6 11.7 3 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 19.68 20.83
92nd Street S Jarvis Ave S Jeffrey Ave S 612 300 3.75 10.5 11.7 3 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 13.93 21.09
92nd Street5 Jergen Ave S Culdesac 176 300 2.375 7.125 11.7 3 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 12.41 20.57
93rd Street S Jeffrey Court Jergen Ave S 818 300 3.25 6.875 11.7 3 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 19.63 22.35
93rd Street5 Jareau Ave S Jasmine Ave S 320 300 3.5 8 11.7 3 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 19.69 23.94
Janero Ave S 91st Street S 90th Street S 697 500 3.25 6.5 19.5 5 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 14.68 19.05
Janie Ave S 91st Street S 90th Street S 748 500 3.25 6.5 19.5 5 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 18.02 17.95
Jareau Ave S Dead End 93rd Street5 513 1700 3.25 7.25 66.3 17 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 16.99 23.40
Jareau Ave S 93rd Street5 91stStreet5 1813 1700 3.125 8.875 66.3 17 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 17.54 22.45
Jareau Ave S 90th Street S 91st Street S 510 1700 3.75 10.5 66.3 17 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 23.01 23.84
Jareau Ave S Culdesac Jareau Ave S Culdesac 194 300 3.75 10.5 11.7 3 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 17.92 21.81
Jarrod Ave S Jareau Ave S(North) Jareau Ave S(South) 1378 300 3 9 11.7 3 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 21.27 22.63
Jarvis Ave S 91st Street S 92nd Street S 583 300 3.75 8 11.7 3 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 20.32 23.32
Jasmine Ave S 90th Street5 Culdesac 1207 500 4.5 8 19.5 5 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 12.33 19.30
Jasmine Ave S Dead End Jeffrey Ave S 715 500 3.5 8 19.5 5 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 22.84 23.55
Jasmine Ave S East Cul de sac Jasmine Ave S Cul de sac 83 300 4.5 8 11.7 3 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 18.16 23.29
Jasmine Ave S West Cul de sac Jasmine Ave S Cul de sac 209 300 4.5 8 11.7 3 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 16.53 21.79
Jeffrey Ave S Jeffrey Ave S Cul de sac (2) Jeffrey Court 1250 1700 3.75 8 66.3 17 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 21.65 22.71
Jeffrey Ave S Jensen Ave S Jeffrey Ave S Cul de sac (2) 298 1700 4.5 9 66.3 17 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 24.47 25.22
Jeffrey Ave S 90th Street S Jensen Ave S 711 1700 4.25 7 66.3 17 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 17.55 23.19
Jeffrey Ave S 93rd Street5 Dead End 420 1700 3.125 7.375 66.3 17 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 17.68 21.04
Jeffrey Ave S Cul de sac (1) Jeffrey Ave S Cul de sac 24 300 4.5 9 11.7 3 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 18.08 22.33
Jeffrey Ave S Cul de sac (2) Jeffrey Ave S Cul de sac 161 300 4.5 9 11.7 3 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 16.42 20.83
Jeffrey Ave S Cul de sac (3) Jeffrey Ave S Cul de sac 104 300 4.25 7 11.7 3 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 16.38 19.90
Jeffrey Bay Jeffrey Ave S Culde sac 92 300 3.75 8 11.7 3 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 13.42 21.17
Jeffrey Court Jeffrey Ave S Culde sac 297 300 4 6 11.7 3 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 21.04 24.48
Jensen Ave S Jeffrey Ave S 90th Street S 1200 500 3.75 10.25 19.5 5 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 15.50 20.94
Jergen Ave S 93rd Street5 Jergen Bay S 907 1700 3.25 7.75 66.3 17 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 17.52 23.38
Jergen Ave S Jergen Bay S 90th Street S 1118 1700 3 8 66.3 17 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 16.48 23.43
Jergen Ave S 93rd Street5 Dead End 714 1700 3.5 7.5 66.3 17 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 15.72 19.48
Jergen Bay South Jergen Ave S Culdesac 429 300 3.75 6.75 11.7 3 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 18.23 21.85
Jergen Court S Jergen Ave S Cul de sac 329 300 3.75 5.5 11.7 3 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 14.18 22.06
Jergen Place Jergen Ave S Cul de sac 345 300 4.25 6.25 11.7 3 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 16.60 21.43
Jergen Ave S Cul de sac Jergen Ave S Cul de sac 38 300 3 8 11.7 3 10/9/13 17.78 10.00 15.01 22.87
Appendix C
eaauN
I NT� RTEC
�������������������
�o���������������
�o�������������o�
�o���������������
�o���������������
� �o���������������
� �o���������������
� �o���������������
� �o���������������
� �o�������m�������
� �o���������������
� �o�������m�������
� �o���������������
� �o���������������
� �o���������������
� �o���������������
� �o�������m�������
� �o���������������
� �o���������������
� �o������������m��
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����������������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����������������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����������������
����������o������
�����������������
�����������������
�����������������
�����������������
��������o��������
�����������������
�����������������
�����������������
�����������������
�����������������
�����������������
�����������������
�����������������
o����������������
�����������������
�������������������
�����������������
�����������������
�����������������
�����������������
�����������������
�����������������
�����������������
����������o������
�����������������
�����������������
�����������������
�����������������
�����������������
��������o��������
���������m����m��
�����������������
����������o������
�����������������
�����������������
���������m�������
�����������������
�����������������
�������������o�o�
�����������������
�����������������
�����������������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m��������m��
�����������������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����������������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m���m�������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����������������
�����m��om�������
�����m�����������
�����������������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�������������������
�����m�����������
�����������������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����������������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m��������m��
�����m�����������
�����������������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����������������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m���m�������
�����m��������m��
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
� �����m�����������
� �����m�����������
� �����������������
� �����m�����������
� �����m�����������
� �����m�����������
� �����m�����������
� �����m��������m��
�����m�����������
�����������������
�����m���m�������
�����m�����������
�����������������
�����m�����������
�����m���m�������
�����m���m�������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�������������������
�����m���m�������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m���m�������
�����m�����������
��o��m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m����o������
������m�����������
������m�����������
������m�����������
������������������
������m�����������
��o��m�����������
��o��m�����������
��o��m�����������
��o��m�����������
��o��m���m�������
��o��m�����������
��o��m�����������
��o��m�����������
�����������������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����������������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����������������
�����m���m�������
�����m�����������
�����������������
�����m��������m��
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�o���m�����������
�o���m�����������
�o���m�����������
�o���m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����������������
�����m�����������
�����m����o������
�����m���m�������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�������������������
�����m�����������
�����������������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
������������������
������m�����������
������m��o��������
������m�����������
������m�����������
������m�����������
������m�����������
������m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m��������m��
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m���m�������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m��o��������
�����������������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����������������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����������������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����������������
�����m�����������
�����m���m����m��
�����������������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
�����m�����������
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Appendix H
Milling Test Areas
lii order to evafiate the feasibility of a inill-overla�-, t�velve test lreas �vere inilled to a depth of
approiimatel�- 2-inches. These test strips «ere approiimatel�- 7.�-feet �vide and 2�-feet long. The
puipose ofthe test strips ��-as to deterinine the quantit�- and severit�r of cracicing belo�� the paVeinent
surface.
Pictures are uichided for each inill area, prior to and after inilling.
Cottage
� Grove
� Pride andPCOSPerity Meet
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Area A
Approsimate Location: 90�� Jergen Avem�e
�`. � ac- '��' —'` — — � �
�, � -_ � � f ,.� ry -� �
�
, .�
� ���
�- ��,
� �
�
_ ���} ��
� � �
-��
- =��=
-�- -��,�=.
- • _ z;�-� z..�
_ - - - �� _
_ _ - ,��- -
_ -
,�. ___. �_..:- .� _ .---:_� . _ .. a .t. �r� _.�.,� �
�
;�.:. r .
�-
'� �� � �l �, .
� �,..�_ y. � , � '^t �
�} "�- �
� � t �
"I'
�� r
�. � �
'�, . _ — .. .� � �.
p .� � �
. � �, ! .. i ��
8 :+ � �
' � ' 4
�
�� �s �.!. T "--"�a�
� + �� z �
� - �
`•�.w�
� � �.� �
� . °� � " -
Pavement cracl�ing patteni more evident after nulling, potential for reflective cracliing.
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Area B
Approximate Location: 933� 93'�� Street
�
� _..�.
...�-
�,
a� � � � �-
: y;.;
��,
� 5� � y.
j ,i
C .�.,.?���
fi!i �
Y /.. �
�+ �ai""
}. �n
s: Y �
. .. ..._ . .. ` � .... �� . . ._ . . � -!�.�'.'
�,wy„�' ? /
�w I :;�: i
� +y
, *
1
!��
�
�' �i��
1 a ,.«
' - -
!r' •
i` �
' f�� .t , ..' � _ .
f {
t
� � .�
i �� �
� � T . �f
��, ��'( a t � � .
� �
� � �� ��,� .���
�. .. � '
- � , �- � _ � � ;��-� � �.�; � `;
, �. ��
p� �
-�- � �� . 3 .' . .' '�Fs . C� ".r�, �'
- A � . � � �' .�. �*:,. 3 �
4 � r� r �... ., :' � . J � ,.
a�� .� Se ' �i � �1' -r d.
�¢: x �f' � d ` .+y .. �, H � 1r �'� �' s t'� ��
.� -�' � � ¢ i ��' � #� d�"',+�
� � Y'� ' r �.d� � w .
✓ "�^/, y �> � (y � .. . y y� �➢"'
��'.� i'�� ' '�. � � � ��= E ��k
� •� y � .r. c . � :
'" . � � � _ � � - � F��� �S ;.
s� i �.. � � - . � � �, r ` �'��ro W
,> � �. : �'
_ �, �-:,.� —
: ��c..�:�vy -,.._ -
Pavement stripping eatends do�� n into the bih�nunoi�s base
r• `.;
�ly �'.
L Y
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project
� �h>
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Area C
Approiimate Location: 9058 Jeffer�- A� em�e
,�„��;, �:.�. - �
_ �..' � �` �
-��_ �� . � � r. .,, �
- _. �� = "",� : --�`�� �"",.#L
-.»_ "_ _. _ _—�
.�.
_ °='�-{:r�;
,
' �. - �'..
�;,
� ,�- ,� ..
R ° �r
,
� �
; ,,' -'-r1
. , �,�
�
�
� - -- =--�,�
- - c.
_ '
_ - � ...''-�, .��;
� " �� '�
• � '� '" ,
..r �- �� `:: � -
Pavement strippuig estends do��n into the bihiininoi�s base.
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
A�•ea D
Approlimate Location: 9138 92"`� Street
,,� - . . -�_ _ �
ir T _
- - �,,
� � �
i . .. ""� � �=�`�'.�-
�
. . . �� � . . . p . . �.�. _ �
�
� W�'
f �.� `�i . � _ _
`!i
_' ��� �._... -
_�
z ,t .
:� ��:
.
a��"�y. ``� ,£ . . ' � � �.
»� . 7 y - . : . ,.� . . �_"�
�-f�".: � �' ..
� � r rif "� � _..�
`t ���_ X ' �. fi � � M1' �I . Q
"�
T � { ,�� "" r �° ¢:' f . N .�!� ) C i+'S '':s��..-
�� � � `7 � " � � �
f � � f
r�l ��a� p� s �, w 2 ":
^" , 1 �'�r � �^ ��!..+�� �� I �, , �;�'�, , . . � f � .i
' L r .1 '
� �
i ���
- ,�.�._ , . . � ,
� _ . . -� s_
�— � ;�;;s�,..� ,�. ° ,� � — _ �„t� _.�! #
�-�,� � � .:�--.: t � � ��.. �
a "� �� �� li�� ��4--�� .1.�ri.e. `.:
i 1c- �+�
�� :fr��:a,e�-��� ,���rt� ��•�,� - "4r�,.�4� " 4 ��`t .=r t'F+�,
� i „� '�Y`_ �.� y� y� y � ^ �
� ' �' � '����� �_y�`�'i��k � :i. w. � �_T��'a�'k:.
�a" a� .�� ��4� �.� � 5 .:..p �_i �' �� P �1n "�
.yw , jd '4, yr . ,�° � ��,...r � � ��` �j'� . ."Sir�.�;
� 7 '� �j.-' r._ .... � a A"r .�.' ^c . yt' *? '.
�� � � _ �� �,; : '_ ; ��'� �.
��_ _ � 'A �_��� y �.� j '. , �A� . ���"�$',yyi''�, .,
RF. �''ait rtf 77S' �7"� `' ' 'y}� ��'�
�Y �,`+ �+ . . � * �T� � +�' . � . ,� "�'F' =i b '�"'
"!'. � �. «M +�.. e.�t�
��v . . � �.�� . �"T �� �� ".�- . 6 � n ���
Mill esposes �ra� el base di�e to tlun pa��ement la� er.
. �
.y� __ �
�' _ � ��v
i ' x. �;.r .�n � h
i��L�k�. � 4 � ��.
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project
� �
��
�-
�;;�".%
��4 �� �
����
� -
� �
. �.,�.;�r
;�.���,�- .
�.
�
�
F"' � r ,,e , . ; ;
. �
,�,;,
✓��
� "� �r� . �
� �r : �_ ..� �,��
�
..,.
_ "� ,
, �
J�. � 4 . . , , .,,,�� .
3
. .f „ .�- �� � rny� ' . , ,,,
Majorin of pa��ement stripping removed, some transverse and longihidinal cracl�s elposed.
�. . �,�
���.�. < -: , _, .
� �''� '� t � � �
� � ,� �� �._
. � � +. ,
F ' , �. ����
� ;�
f , *� 7 � ` �•� ��' .
! � � �r.
�', � . �
, � � .�.
�r � ��,.-
� � , ,. � �
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT �
Area E
Approlimate Location: 9096 Jaiue A� em�e
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Area F
Approsiinate Location: 9019 Jasmine A�-em�e
- -,� ��: :� -
� �,rs ' r �'� � '�._.: ,
' ,�s s �-� � - � - � 'y
�� �. �I
1 �. '*��, ,,r
u,,
s
. � � �aa�s. �<:�. t�°.:_.--�
` .._ :`'is` .-- .
f ;
� �
,�� .
��� �'
- ;�,�.,'_
- :;' _�
�. ��
1,
f .. :t
`�, -' _
. ^�
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project
Trans� erse cracl�ing and joint repair reqnired.
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Area G
Approlimate Location: 923> Jeffer�° A�em�e
� � h �
�_ �'�� * , �
�;"'_ 3. "� ,,}• _ .
�`..: �
✓ �;
�.. �. _.
�� � �- µ
� _{
� ,- �"; •=
+ �� .,::� �:,
a� � - �
�� ..
r: : "t��i � �"ir!'`
'�' ' � �' "�
��. _:
•. �t��
"'�. ��
r� . � • ,�. �..
�� .�4 ,;i7.
:.�� .� +..�►�
�• . � i .
Cv,�;'
�� *
t + y.
� ��
;: � , i � �
� ' ~%� � rV..�, �
�� � ,�-, � � �ir!
��' _ ��
yti ..
f:;
;
�/ �° � � � , � � ;� a
���
Majorin of pa��ement strippuig remo��ed, thermal cracl� present bnt base in good condition.
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Area H
Approximate Location: 9295 Jergen A��ei�ne
�� -
�
'
`.. = �
�
_ _ , _ .' - �
�
�
` �
_ _ ,�. - =�
.. � ~ ° �'��d�
'� ,
. : . - � , , � � .� .
� >-+�- , � � , :_j.
-� _ � .. i� ..
�s .''�� � ��s �..
z
� � °i�.'�,<; � �,., . .
F
� �
�
' 5�.��_. ... �' .�>
`^Yj�
�
,.�_.-�.�'- �- � , � �' . .. _
Y ,
A ' G.
Y� � � �;qi��'y,j.A�{, ��L�\
_.-�,� � . Y' �i�6 'v� ' �"�
i. �a4u 7� �. �0.c
Milling sm re� eals cracl�s in bih�nunous base, ilh�strates � olume of potential reflecti��e craclLing.
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Area I
Approsimate Location: 9189 Jeraen A�°et�ne
� . __� ,�.' � �, , � — -,�� ,,
� `
_ z �
� , ,� a -�.oM- , �'+�A. .K_Y •
(. � . . .._ . , . .-..
. '�
w
` ' ����' �
1
� � �e! a� - - �
A �� �
. � �f
� . : . _ . .. ..: _ .� . . ;. . , . _ - _
- ..� ���+..�rw.
�.
� , .
Noi7nal thermal cracl�ing present.
�
Cin� of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
_ _ _ .� �.: !
e �"
���° __
� y
`��
����� �� �
� _ °.
�
,�-�`�� � F
� .aS_. 3 .. ..
- - - -- .��
- �.�-��,.�(�
_ � �� � '"
S � M � �� f J`
_,r._..,. �.��,��. °, ,� '�;:
���� `'���
•� i
` �� � . ,`���� . ,i. .�
� e `,��_ "` �
� � ��'o ►+ �
� �
�..�;f� �1F � � '`
� , , ,,.
- :� ,
= � - erii�.�
��
- - _ � ��
� ar � � �����
N
`
� � �
� tJ: •
� , - � ' ��M
y , � "; a .. ! � : � . � �.
r_ � �` '�� r ;� � j�
:r'
Some pa`Tement holditig moisture, patchti asphalt stripping in bihuiunous base present.
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project
Area J
Approlimate Location: 9328 Jairod A�-em�e
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Area K
Approiimate Location: 9�3 � Jareat� A� em�e
` 7 °.� . F= ' � ' "'�,
F �.� , . � � -� :� • •- �'
� �
�� �.,� .._ -
_" �
� 7
� �,s ` ,
� �-: _ _
�� _ �
�� ���
� � � R=
'��
F �
. . . - '.�L,t.
.�. �
� � � �� ;
Pa� ement strippuig estends do�� n into the bih�nunous base, ��eali pavement noted in areas of stripping.
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project
_�
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
Area L
Approxiinate Location: 9� 15 Jeffery° A� enne
, , ����
� y �� � �...� �,,W � . ,a�
���_ .. �s. _
. ,��,.,
Yi.kT
•--� - _ � � �
� �,� � -
� .�
__ ��,�.'
�; _ _
°_ _ �g;". _ � _
.'.,� .r»_ �.t
- -- . �`„�.� —
-s
� # x. '� � T . � -
,� �h v � 2 _ _ ' _. f •�- ��1�-�ti R ��-
f � 1 -'� � �`� ��.M�°'�� �y �K:. : . I �
Is���x ���-- � :..s� � � � '� • �- _ �
, `�� � ..�;_ � - . .
��'- .„ .s.� - �`: .
_ �
� - ' ` - _ , ' �.
- � � � � - �..: � . . _. :'...
.-. r_... .6._ -._. .. . . . .r.._.. _-.. �;c�':
� � ��� � • � .
��� ��, _� .�,.�. . ��
_ a
. 'ci. ��� '
j w �, �
� ' . ��».� ; _. �°�
r q � `; ., a ' � ��� - . '
�. _
':y�v � : � �,i .�-. • . : .
� � s '�
� � .
. . . . ..� ��.} . . .
t � �
. � � � �
�� " .t� ._ � + ?.s. ` '«
._�� _ . �: , __ _
Cin° of Cottage Grove, Mimiesota
201� Pavement Management Project
Pa� strippnig eltends do�j n into the bituininoi�s base.
A SPECIAL BENEFITS APPRAISAL
RESTRICTED USE REPORT FORMAT
(BRKW File No. 7234)
4 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES
2014 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROJECT
SOUTH OF 90 STREET SOUTH &
EAST OF ISLAY AVENUE SOUTH
COTTAGE GROVE, MN �5016
VALUATION DATE: DECEMBER �, 2013
FOR
CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE
ATTN: JENNIFER LEVITT, P.E.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR / CITY ENGINEER
12800 RAVINE PARKWAY SOUTH
COTTAGE GROVE_ MN ��016
I:
PAUL J. GLEASON
AND
WILLIAM E. PETERSEN
� !
�
REAL ESTATf VALUATIC]M SERVICES
� � _
REAL ESTRTE VALUATION SERWICES
�eCZ1Tl�Z1 I9, Z� 1 J
Jennifer Levitt, P.E.
Communit�- Development Director / City Engineer
Cit�r of Cottage Grove
12800 Ravine Parlc���a�� South
Cottage Grove, MN �5016
RE: Special Benefits Appraisal
Four Single-Fainil�- Residential Properties
Cottage Grove 201� Paveinent Manageinent Project
South of 9p Street South and East of Islav Avenue South
Dear Ms. Levitt:
In accordance ���ith �-our request, «�e are providing ti-ou ��ith a special benefits
appraisal pertaininb to four residential properties located in an area proposed for
road��a�� rehabilitation and utility repairs through the Cottage Grove 2014 Paveinent
Manageinent Project. This appraisal is presented in a restricted use report forinat, in
accordance «ith the requireinents of the Uniforin Standards of Professional Appraisal
Practice.
At the request of the Cit�- of Cottage Grove, «e have made special benefit appraisals
of four representative single-fainil�- residential properties fronting streets in the
proposed project area. The purpose of the appraisal is to provide an opinion of the
increase in market v�lue, if any, to the sub properties as a consequence of the ne��
street and utilit� iinproveinents to be coinpleted in 201�.
The opinion of the value benefits resulting from the public improvement project is as
of Deceinber �, 2013, the date of inspection of the project area and si�bject properties.
The intended use of the appraisal is for assisting cit�- officials in lev�-ing in an
equitable manner special assessinents to properties benefited b�T the iinproveinent
project. The intended users of the appraisal are Cit�r of Cottage Grove officials.
The project area encoinpasses several residential neighborhoods located east of Isla�-
Avenue South along the south side of 90` Street South. The streets to be rehabilitated
and the proposed improvements are detailed ��ithin this report.
n,... . �,_ ,.. , i��.. i ��. i _�.�i —._��� __ , ���� , _ �
651.640.6114 FAX 651.b4b.$08b wti��w.brkw.ccmm
The value benefits, if an�-, of street, utilit�- and other such public iinproveinents accrue
to the land component of a property, not to the value of buildin�s and other
iinprovements on the land. Consequentl�-, this special benefits anal�-sis is liinited to
the valuation of onl�T the land coinponents of the properties appraised.
The before-and-after valuation methodolog�- has been l�sed in this appraisal, ��hich
anal�-zes the market value of the subject land prior to the proposed project in relation
to the inarlcet value of the land after the project is coinpleted. The difference bet�veen
the before and lfter opinions of land value reflects the v11ue of special benefits.
In ol�r opinion, the special value benefits to the subject properties resl�lting from
coinpletion of the 2014 Pavement Management Project as of December 5, 2013 are as
follo�vs:
City of Cottage Grove 2014 Pavement Management Project
# Address Opmion of Special Benefit
1 9129 Janie Avenue South $4,100
2 9063 Jensen Avenue South $4,600
3 9254 Jareau Avenue South $4,600
4 9236 Jergen Court South $5,000
This appraisal assignment is not based on a requested minimum valuation or a specific
valuation for approval of a loan. The opinions of inarlcet value and speci�l benefits in
the appraisal �tiere developed independent of an�- undue influence.
The appraised values assuine all real estate taies and special assessinent balances, if
an�-, have been paid in full. The values are gross values �vith no allo�vances m�de for
brolcerage cominissions, real estate t1�es or other carr�ring costs associated ��-ith 1
propert�- during its marketing period. The values are based on an eiposure time of
three to siz inonths.
This appraisll report has been preplred in conforinit�- ��-ith the Uniforin Standards of
Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) as promulgated b�- the Appraisal Foundation.
The facts and information contained in this report «ere obtained froin sources th�t are
considered to be relilble and are true to the best of our lcno��-ledge and belief, but are
not guaranteed. This appraisal report is contingent upon the assuinptions and liiniting
conditions included ��ithin this report.
BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 2
Yoi�r attention is directed to the follo�ving report �vhich summ�rizes the data, analyses
and conclusions that support the opinions of value.
Sincerel��,
BRI�W APPRAISALS, INC.
f � �� -
4 `� �
����r�
_ . ��"
Paul J. G1�ason
Certified General Real Propert�- Appraiser
Minnesota License #4003073
� � � �
William E. Petersen
Certified General Real Propert�T Appraiser
Minnesota License #40016�9
BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTIES APPRAISED/LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS ..................1
PURPOSE/INTENDED USE OF THE APPRAISAL/INTENDED USERS ............................ 1
PROPERTY RIGHTS APPRAISED ................................................................................ 1
ZONING....................................................................................................................... 1
PROJECT ARE.� .�ND SUBJECT PROPERTIES LOG�TION M_�P ................................................. �
SCOPE OF WORK ........................................................................................................3
COMPETENCY PROVISION .........................................................................................3
EXTRAORDINARY ASSUMPTIONS AND HYPOTHETICAL CONDITIONS ....................�
MARKET VALUE DEFINITION .................................................................................... i
CONTINGENT AND LIMITING CONDITIONS .............................................................. i
DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTIES ..................................................................7
DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE ..................................................... 10
EZISTING STREET (:ONSTRUCTION DaTES ...................................................................... 11
PA�'Eb1ENT C;ONDITION INDEY M�P ............................................................................... 12
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ...................................................... 13
PKOPOSED Il�IYRO\"E�IENTS M�P ................................................................................... 1�
HIGHEST AND BEST USE .......................................................................................... li
SPECIAL BENEFIT CONSIDERATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS .................................... 16
SPECIAL BENEFIT ANALYSIS PROCESS .................................................................. 17
SPECIAL BENEFIT OPINIONS ................................................................................... 17
EXPOSURE TIME ...................................................................................................... 17
CERTIFICATION ....................................................................................................... 18
PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS .......................................................................... 19
COMPANY PROFILE ................................................................................................. 23
IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTIES APPRAISED/LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS
The o�tiners, addresses, tai parcel nuinbers and legal descriptions of the four appraised
properties are presented belo�v. A inap depicting the area of the proposed project and
the location of the subject properties is on the ne�t pa�e. The properties are described
in greater detail later in this report.
Subject Properties Summary
Fee Owner Address Tax Parcel LD. No. Legal Description
1 Scott M& Nancy Jean Lewis 9129 Janie Avenue S. 21-027-21-11-0067 Lot 21, Block 3, Heritage Estates Addition
2 Andraea Magee 9063 Jensen Avenue S. 22-027-21-21-0061 Lot 5, Block 2, Ridgewood 3rd Addition
3 Wayne W. & Nancy A. Riepe 9254 Jareau Avenue S. 22-027-21-23-0094 Lot 2, Block 3, Knollwood 3rd Addition
4 Thomas J. & Linda L. Rucker 9236 Jergen Court S. 22-027-21-24-0065 Lot 22, Block 2, Ridgewood 6th Addition
PURPOSE/INTENDED USE OF THE APPRAISAL/INTENDED USERS
The purpose of the appraisal is to develop an opinion of the value of special benefits,
if an�T, that «ill accrue to four single-fainil�- residential properties due to the proposed
rehlbilitation of their fronting streets b�r the Cit�- of Cottlge Grove's 2014 Paveinent
Management Project. The intended use of the special benefits appraisal is to assist
Cit�- of Cottage Grove officials in lev�-ing in an equitable manner special assessinents
to properties benefited b�r the improvement project. The intended users of the report
are Cit�- of Cottage Grove officials.
PROPERTY RIGHTS APPRAISED
The propert�- rights appraised are those of the fee simple estate.
ZONING
The zoning of the appraised properties is as follo«s:
# Address Zonmg Designation
1 9129 Janie Avenue South R-4, Low Density Residential
2 9063 Jensen Avenue South R-3, Smgle Family Residential
3 9254 Jareau Avenue South R-5, Medium Density Residential
4 9236 Jergen Court South R-4, Low Density Residential
BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 1
' . 9�Yli57kEE'i0. �..� � ! ! � � � � �� !_.! � r � �� � ! a I� � � i i I� ! � � � `I � � � IA ly � '._�. � �. � � i !_� .aJ Fi
� 3�b� 9Wi 3•iZ c.1]3 96;,� �v_ . a,]3:. ' � ,_�
��� '___"_' 34_a. 9mii . 'S,i . aCV:' 9:43 3].a} 5,h]a _
� 9`j 9C�:' 5_ t. ]�c ., 92i' 95Z 593' -. ��;:� 4JF� 4]GF .�
+ � �� 5]1 -t :5:5 .
-' --- -° � I � .. � 4LV_C 43�t � "h1CN "- 5L]3 '��
■ ¢'i � 4v.33 %Y3? ' : �#S ' _ x ��5�19 , y 9k92] ✓` pqd7 ... '
9�:ea ' '}� i 7a'% � sact � lP46 .7 IARERVAVE $4 �, 5�as su0i , 2� �9]s� �]Y3`' '� 9 �� :. ' �'.` �•� ,'�' �k � ' ' iltlis�� ,
i . 4� - 7ulL1E �„ . I
■ I� � .
�!]c �.: AaK1 AOii �- 1 .
1
� � _ � 3orr -�'� � �� :� i0x5 55.Y+ � : � �4� sax9 ,�� - lBt6 � ia33 '
3]a4 I 3 2'. I 9�8? 9Gfl3� �CS7 � 4GIi�405i �_, �- ���� 94143 !� I_ . •� 74 � 9L+3E ,J I
� . � �. �. � � �. � � wa,s� � . �.t- ... _ �.:, �, � � � I 3c��c o � -_- +` k.SA�;ry � �` �� ,fFF{tPd. I av� sv3�
' .-a 'an° � . � ( � 'MF -t f A --! �..
� . 2£7,6 E53: . !2!6 41.2 .... � _.. ' F . . _ \ , l9�S4 9G 8 -� � '' fy.� � ,- 3t1R1 _ 5G+-4 2 � �
a 6: a 404i� .,' �� r 90� .� 90ai 9[�:.3
- � Ae:c - ..... • esaa eam��. � � - . y _. : � . _ � "'''d' e���e sYU _ie! �� 4 `{ � f � smaa� �`� a�` � ��wa� 3''��mv. - . ' �oa' i ea � �
"� 332e � 3-YL F �9:Z-'P130 9i�Y. 9�SK� �. } I �' I� . g � � � ° �`5�
iL3A � 'iHa[ iZ"i4 � � �. �Wif -11. .. .� � 3i96 � . . I � ��,� �$ ,, �i I � 99F2 9� ,
� �1 - r-- .._� . . ; � ' �3 �' � 149YI�i
� 2.533 6@# I 6l6d � £ gqgqy: � -r_ § :. �_E: .. }it7 � . 91sT STR.€E' Stl. 4 � YU9se� � �" 369q ��yqga�'� � ._' '" '° ° '
`p4S�SdiS
.. � E6��.*. �� BH% 49�. I I ai.' i g...� °_." ....� 91�^.. ; 9 0§ e1.3 9.2F IH3l i A�.i �-.. � S1'3d ,t .i. - ��Yy e.> �
F . ,
n a � .
f _ ' Y �� �
9i � �P.EE SO. f vy '.. . � � i s'v; ,�` _. .'�n /' . T� � � ... . �
. i . . _ I . . � �� � � �. : �� ;`u aaaa� � � l � - ---� r �� . �� i^` a�a ., � � � �`=
� I � r� � 5.is I I
313f ��
�3H-�^.3 S!_i R@3 i5d_�@55A�BSY36lST59Siia955_9 543 �fd13�:� htY" 1 S°A.� } 3E �� 913'. t : 4.X3 \ �Y3iDS � � � Y774'y E 1 93A3� .�}u23 �
# �-� �-���"�`�"�' � �7Y'�'���"� 11_ 'y � 'P]C� 9i3'. $iF� . y � _ � �ML51 . 9h� ��� I t l:19 �f � Ji �\ Ali� � 96$ly- a]'n �
•i]E s.s.� � - i,. 9137v`-.AJ P d,�C�.���p d� -siu f s�s.'t�� r-``` w�'f't�im . t.I �
, i � � :. � . 1 _ �'Yi79� 91Fi �- 5355 N r `a� " +Jy$¢ �' .
.� aaet 3 �' - ,�xar ��� i � -�__ , sasx ' - a ~ �.yis .aase,,:�-s)ya�.�
g�ar gi�
� � �.: �asa ,
� . � , � cs:^: 91s3 I � _ 9�irE , =..,� .lz.i� � ti +9�2� 1 ; `� !_�r�' i I .
3 ''J 3 `7 � . ' 3 9131:.- 9 li '!? �� '�lSi '
� � � 91BF ' di3Rai . gFA�-+� 913'F � C �'� S`�.�-�
4t26 91Mry4J] 913i�1•4i _ ]� 9 FE -"-.A �.�2,`k1Th �s�no , �2NC75TkEf
- biH ��"� - � I '
� C � �. ur� l ; �� n rxa� I �:_ � as�r sxu ,� s.�a yaaassss
� sas: ,1
_ � 319i 9}91 i +1S# 5'fRF� �6. _. . � l3WT� 1 5211 �I, $1� ' ..� �. *' • 'P �� I i
� _ ' :..i3 : . . . 5 � � £( -- J �' 9ica `' 3zsn �T =., ezra �.� r� ' --- �
� � �� yE+Jf 5P]+� � u � 9'Pl y ., �3.3 J' �� g 4 ` .� . SP?S
� � . . �f '. . _
Y I � ,. .3t27 �' #: y3� a, s J '9 ]J 9F�y .� aW rS� .. I 31 .� � # u F 4k6S � y�� . _
��' � � 9if9 :� `, saa� �, � .� !l� �.�� Y.: •,..: gitii � l373',�tp3]2 . S , Ey; ...... � C. 9 5:
_ 2 � 9
� � __ -. ., "�_ ..,.. ., ° � 4 2_3 485�� � �� a=3C y:5,v §293 �
� � ' �
� 92eB 1' ��.. �_ �' e � 4 ] � - a° J 9�f�� / ��
� 9sa] f
. � � - _ .. - '�_ D � S __-_ A#P7 ,�r 833xF ..,- 413.
�''�� .3_.
$ � 9na - y a� i, a 1 ' � � l23� { �l7S9 , -� �� �;�3 1
•ssa .�{ � . ,a � ,y..- �^ 9xrs .
F �? 823P � ... ft2iT �� �
� � 'Sld. ��� q _
� � ' .5;
I , � $ , �3'ZiY� +, 11 ' .��_ ,��
_ _ '- . ..
43.:". � 83i4 ' .r 41]s .k � 7!#T - �sa '�
` � . . ' 33 � . . � '25a '�
�
� 1 � 53r.'k c* . s " F 5l23 � .. .: --�
I�
� '�
x �
Y
� a� , �aa: s ` sa=lsasc�'�, ,'� sxg�, �+-�, �xz� y�/A' ��a-
83JG � � : !33's l3a5 I � r9lTI �C s33F� - -'�
� .. _ ,� r / � �;zs .--� � f ` � } . u+w._ ,.__. 937. �},` L � RRt. . '��, , "� 3�= �� � �, s ..
�. , '� 9nx . �3k0 51H4t1 5b �-- � � . s3+t f 4 � . .
� a �,P.• � �
N �,' 43i2 f �I+fPH T�J R�� � 9i19 ?3!i t9 ?354 4363 92YT � �!M3 � 33•y �.� 9i'9 i�1�9 � 9a�:3 3-'„3 � - "3-f I 9E2' �
p1AYEMcNT D15�iiIC7 F4 �
3@J y � i
� � . 46 9 9�AA I � .. � � 9rt� � i ! � . �� "_- � . 93]T � '� � �33Y $i39
���e I •Ay}] �� - S33i� � $7i3 ��-.. �sa5 a3 �a3.. 33s; . � �� - �
� _ . 1 �. . I . . �f 5431 $S% I I 9355 535z. �. � _ ' � � � � �.a .ir . `3Y. 43i.'J
4423 � __ '
.. � 3a2a { . � �_. . 9LM 6�a ��` ��-- ,� 4�W% S;°�� � � 3 . -N, :, 5§?'@ ,�. , I }3'33
�
J �!a` � ...� � � ��� � ��3<Lf T+l9l '7SS3 9#ii � fNT]' � Ss3i R ,^ 9ib � �� � j � %3P � ' � �1 � #3f2 �
'�' - �1•._ � 9T9P �9353 f3.�i
�� /' . �� `�9s33 �
~ � 3+'�ui f 17.RSiCe[] AVE SC7. � A�M Z � �; ��{ � � a_ � ' '� _r ,4 ERG�ETI iLrO ,� SS� �
�� p � I � . .� s�m � �� wrv€� -- sex � � s+�s � � - - � � �.:s�
� L
�� � i- i� � � � �. 919l,•.� � ` '� i � 9+163�44l0 �dSd :s �
�ibi 3id8- • 3 . - - � ^'. (
:. \,. � .. .. �� � r+yiB! � � y0.'9 9�6'ii %+134 I F4`r + gqfr� { 93]F 9s9]
� ' �a � rr� s� � � � s � a � �- c �..�-��,�:�.� _� a-�
-- - __
- T - � ,
Project Area and Subject Properties Location Map
BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 2
SCOPE OF WORK
The Cit�- of Cottage Grove is proposing to rehabilitate several streets in an established
residential area east of Islay Avenue South along the south side of 90` Street South.
Pro,ject maps herein depict the area of the proposed improveinents. The project is
referred to as the City of Cottage Grove 2014 Paveinent Manageinent Project.
At the request of the client, four representative residential properties located in the
area of the proposed iinproveinents project are apprlised in this report. The opinions
of special benefits, if an�-, accruing to the appraised properties as a result of the
project ��i11 be used b�- the client in deterinining the appropriate assessinents to be
levied against other properties �� ithin the proj ect area.
Since the benefits of pl�blic improvement proj ects such as street rehabilitation accrue
to the land coinponent of properties on1�-, the valuation in this report involves land
onl�T. Opinions of the market value of the subject properties have been developed in
this appraisal using the Direct S11es Comparison Approach. This approach, ���hich is
the one inost appropriate for valuing land, involves the coinparison and anal�-sis of
land parcels recentl�- sold «hich are similar to the land being appraised. The
application of the Cost and Income Approaches t5-pically applies on1�- �zhen a property
valultion includes buildings and other iinproveinents having contributor�- value. The
subject land parcels are valued before and after coinpletion of the proposed street and
l�tilit�- iinproveinents. The difference bet�veen the before and after opinions of marlcet
value is the special benefit value attributable to the proposed project.
This report is presented in the restricted use report format in compliance «ith the
reportin� requireinents of Standards Rule 2-2 (c) of the Uniform Standards of
Appraisal Practice (USPAP). The results of the anal�-sis and the conclusions
pertaining to the value benefits to the subject properties are presented in an
abbreviated inanner in this report, at a level of detail sufficient for the needs of the
intended users. Additional notes, anal�-ses, and supporting data are retained in the
appraisers' office workfile. The opinions and conclusions stated in this report may
not be understood properl�r «-ithout additional information in the ��-orlcfile. The report
is intended to be read and used onl�� b�- the intended users identified herein.
COMPETENCY PROVISION
Paul J. Gleason has been a full-time professional real estate appraiser since April
1992. William E. Petersen has been a full-time professional real estate appraiser since
Noveinber 1986. Provided later in this report, are suinmaries of their professional
qualifications. The educational training and eitensive ��orlc eiperience of the
appraisers, each of �� hoin is licensed as a Certified General Real Propert�r Appraiser,
enable coinpletion of this appraisal assigninent in a professional inanner consistent
«-ith the intent of the coinpetenc�- provision of the Uniforin Stlndards of Professional
Appraisal Practice.
BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 3
EXTRAORDINARY ASSUMPTIONS AND HYPOTHETICAL CONDITIONS
An Eztraordinar�- Assumption is defined in the Uniform Standards of Professional
Appraisal Practice (USPAP) 2012-2013 Edition �c��The Appraisal Foundation, Page U-3,
�s:
An assz�m�tion, dir�ectly r•elated to a s�ecific assignment, as of�the
effective date of assignment r�eszrlts, which, if foz�nc�' to be false,
could alter the Appraiser's opinions or conclusions.
A H�-pothetical Condition is defined in the Uniforin Standards of Professional
Appraisal Practice (USPAP) 2012-2013 Edition �c;The Appraisal Foundation, Page U-3,
as:
A cov�dition, directly �°elated to a s�ecific assig�me�t, which is
contr�ary to what is known by the ap�t°aiset° to exist on the effective
date of the assignment resz�lts, bz�t is iasec� for the �ur�ose of
analysis.
Comments: A hypothetical condition in this appraisal is it is assuined, for the
purposes of special benefits valuation, that on the effective date of valuation of
December �, 2013, in the before position on that da�- the streets in front of the sub
properties ��ere in their pre-improved state (old, �iorn and deteriorlted) 1nd later on
that da�T, in the after position, the street rehabilitation had been completed. In
actualitv, the rehabilitation process had not begun on that date, but is rather planned
to be completed in 2014. Appl�-ing the h��pothetic�l condition facilitates completing �
before-and-after valuation as of the effective date of valuation.
See Contingent and Liiniting Conditions, «�hich are standard assuinptions that app15� to
the appraisal, later in this report.
BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 4
MARKET VALUE DEFINITION
Marltet Value as defined b�- the United States Departinent of the Treasur�- through the
Comptroller of the Currenc�r and the Office of Thrift Supervision is:
The most �robable �r�ice which a pf°ope�ty should bf°ing in a
co�r��etitive and ope� ma�ket zrn�'et� all co�ditions rec�iaisite to a fair
sale, the bz�yer and seller, each acting przrc�ently, knowledgeably
avrd assumi�g the �rice is not affectec� by ar�dzae stimarizrs�. Im�licit
in this c�efinition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified
date and the passing of title from selle� to bi�ye� zrnde� conditions
whereby:
♦ bu�-er and seller are t�-pically inotivated;
♦ both parties are �vell inforined or ��e11 advised, and each acting in ��hat he
considers his o�vn best interest;
♦ a reasonable tiine is allo���ed for eiposure in the open inarlcet;
♦ payinent is made in terins of cash in U.S. dollars or in terins of financial
arrangeinents coinparable thereto: and
♦ the price represents the normal consideration for the propert5� sold
unlffected b�r special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by
an�-one associated ��-ith the sale.
This definition is also recognized b�- the Appraisal Foundation and is part of the
Uniforin Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP).
CONTINGENT AND LIMITING CONDITIONS
This appraisal report is subject to the follo��ing Limiting Conditions and Assumptions:
l. The legal descriptions contained herein are assuined to be correct.
2. The appraiser assumes no responsibilit�- for matters legal in nature affecting the
propert�- appraised or the title thereto. nor does the appraiser render an�r
opinion as to the title, ��hich is assumed to be good and marlcetable. The
propert�- is appraised as thol�gh l�nder responsible o�vnership.
3. No surve�- has been prepared of the property b�r the appraiser and no
responsibilit�- is lssuined in connection �vith such inatters. Slcetches in this
report are included on1�- to assist the reader in visualizing the property.
�. Inforination furnished b� others is assuined to be reliable. Ho�� ever, the
appraiser assuines no responsibilit�- for its accurac�-.
�. In cases ��-here no soil tests have been subinitted, the appraiser has lssuined a
good subsoil condition, subject to visual observations noted in the report.
6. The appraiser assumes that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions of the
propertST, subsoil or structures, �vhich �vould render it inore or less valuable.
The appraiser assuines no responsibilit�- for such conditions or for engineering
that might be required to discover such factors.
BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 5
7. The appr�iser is not required to give testimon�- or �ppear in court because of
having made this appraisal «ith reference to the propert� in question, unless
arrangements have been previousl�- made.
8. The distribution of the total valuation in this report bet�z een land and
improvements applies on1�- under the highest and best use of the property.
9. The Byla« s and Regulations of the professional appraisal organizations ��-ith
��-hich the appraiser is affiliated govern disclosure of the contents of the
appraisal report.
10. Possession of this report, or a cop�- thereof, does not carr�- ���ith it the right of
publication. It ina�� not be used for an� purpose b}T an�- person other than the
part�- to ���hom it is addressed «ithout the �� ritten consent of the appraiser, and,
in an�- event. on1�- «ith proper �vritten qualifications and on1�- in its entiret�-.
11. Neither all nor 1n�- plrt of the contents of this report, or a cop�- thereof, shall
be conve��ed to the public throu�h advertising, public relations, ne��s, sales or
an� other media �� ithout �� ritten consent and approval of the appraiser. Nor
shall the appraiser, firin or professional organization of «hich the appraiser is a
ineinber be identified �vithout the ���ritten consent of the appraiser.
12. The value concll�sion assuines all taies and special assessinents are paid in full.
13. The after improveinents valuation in this appraisal assumes proposed
iinproveinents have been coinpleted in accordance �vith the description of the
proposed �vorlc provided to the apprlisers b�T the Cit�T of Cottage Grove.
Environmental Disclaimer: The value opinions in this report are based on the
assuinption that the subject properties are not ldversel�r affected b�- the e�istence of
hazardous substances or detrimental environmental conditions. A routine inspection
of the properties did not reveal or indicate an�- such conditions. In that the appraisers
are not qualified in this field of ezpertise, the client is encoi�raged to retain an e�pert
in such investigations, if so desired.
BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 6
DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTIES
Neighborhood
The subject properties are located «ithin an established. fii11�- developed residentill
neighborhood in the south-central part of Cotta�e Grove. Primar�- access into the area
is provided b�- U.S. High�va�- 10/61 and Jamaica Avenue South, �tihich ineet at a nearb�
interchange around «hich is eitensive coininercial activit�-. The inap on page 2 sho« s
the residential area in �� the sub,ject properties 1re loclted.
The oldest hoines in the neighborhood, ty-picall�r dating froin the mid-to-late 1980s are
located in the north�vest sector, along the south side of 9p` Street South, and in the
central portion. The ne��-est hoines. built in the 11te 1990s, are gener111�- in the
southeast area. The client has requested a special benefit appraisal of four properties
located ��ithin the area of the proposed project. The appraisers have selected four
representative properties for the anal�-sis, described belo�v and depicted on later plat
in�ps.
1. 9129 Janie Avenue South
This is considered to be a t��pical and representative single-fainil�r propert�- in the
north�vest portion of the project area. The rectangular lot has 6� feet of fronta�e on
Janie Avenue South and the land area is 8,000 SF or 0.18 acres according to
Washington Count�-. The lot is un�� ooded and the topography is generall�r level. The
house on the lot ��-as built in 1987. The frontin� street ���1s built the sline �rear.
2. 9063 Jensen Avenue South
This propert�r, located in the northeasterl�r portion of the pro,ject 1rea, is improved
«ith a house built in 1991. The lot has 83 feet of frontage on Jensen Avenue South.
The land area is 11,643 SF or 0.27 acres according to Washington Count�-. The lot is
generall�- level and un�vooded. The fronting street �� as built in 1989.
3. 9254 Jareau Avenue South
This propert�-, located in the south�zesterl�- portion of the project area, is iinproved
«-ith a house built in 1993. The lot has 70.69 feet of fronta�e on Jareau Avenue
Sol�th. The land area is 13,621 SF or 0.31 acres according to Washington Count��.
The lot is generall�- level and un«ooded. The fronting street �� as built in 1993.
4. 9236 Jergen Court South
This property, located in the southeasterl�- portion of the project area, is improved
��ith a house built in 1994. The lot has 49.36 feet of frontage on the cul-de-sac of
Jergen Court South. The land area is 20,687 SF or 0.�47 acres according to Washington
County. The un��ooded lot is generall�- level at the front «ith a do«n«ard ��-allcol�t
slope at the rear. The fronting street �� as built in 1993.
BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 7
� � �� � � �
� +� � ' � � � � ���� � � �
��+� � 1 ��.�i3
12"�.�J(lF � —
,� t � 5, QD L�.J
� �" '� � � � ` � 2
� � � ��� � ���� � �
_ � �tQ� � � ,��.� ,��.� �
��.aa ,�
�
I
,� , - � �� �,� � a �
'�� � � I � ��� �
16�.f(1! � 125.iH] �2(�.�?�1 Q
- �
� � � � S �,; � � � �
�Qt)� 1} � � � �� � �
� ��� � � �
��.��
f ���,c� ���,� �
.a� ��.a.�
I � �� � 2 �
L 9129 Janie Avenue South
2. 9063 Jensen Avenue South
BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 8
3. 9254 Jareau Avenue South
4. 9236 Jergen Court South
BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 9
DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE
The area of the proposed project includes neighborhoods in the Heritage Estates
Addition, Ridge�vood l� through 7 Additions and Knoll�vood 1�` through 3'`'
Additions. An en�ineering report of the e�istin� streets and iinproveinents in the
project area dated Noveinber 2013 �vas provided b�- the firin of Bolton & Menlc, Inc.
Streets: The streets in the project area are urban-residential design and «ere
originall�- constructed bet«-een 1979 and 1997, as depicted in the eihibit on page 1 1.
The streets have concrete cl�rb and �utter and are t�-pically� 32 feet ��ide from curb face
to curb face. �� ith the eiception of Jeffer�- Avenue �� hich is 44 feet �vide. The
Pavement Condition Indei (PCI) of the streets generall�- ranges from 50 to 60 on a
scale of 1 to 100. Project arel paveinents at the lo«er end of the inde� are considered
to be in fair condition and generall�- eihibit inajor distress. A PCI inap is on a
follo�vinb pa�e.
Core slinples of project area streets indicate the average depth of eiisting bituininous
paving to be 3.�8 inches and the average depth of the aggregate base at 7.60 inches, as
indicated in the ezhibit on the nezt page. A common problein in the ezisting streets is
stripping, �vhich is described as the separation of aggregate froin the asphalt due to
moisture. Strippin� is reportedl�- most severe in the streets constructed in the 1990s.
Additional inoisture ��-i11 likel�- enter the paveinent structure as inore cracics appear and
accelerate deterioration as the paveinent ages.
Sections of eiisting concrete curb and gutter have settled, crlcked or have defects.
Approiiinatel�- 8-10% of the curb is in poor condition and reql�ires removal and
replaceinent.
Sanitar�- Se«-er: The eiisting sanitarv se��-er pipe is generall�- in good condition
althol�gh some areas eihibit root intrusion, craciced pipes and sags.
Water Main: Eiisting inains �vere installed ��ith the development of the
nei�hborhoods. The «-ater inains are considered to be in good condition. Ho��-ever,
some valves ina�� need corroded bolts replaced or iniscellaneol�s repairs.
Storm Se�ver: Storin se«�er mains are generall�r in good condition. Ho«ever, cracked
or brolcen pipes and dirt�- lines are present in soine locations.
BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 10
��
� ,�
� g . � �
��� ��
� �
�� L
g I
\
,� � �f
Co1 ag� Grove
f II illE$o.]
r,
��. ,
G � ������ '� i
Ij `�/fj� �
/
y �� . j � /,.
'�/ � � 1'- ��
� � � / I
�� /� � � ,
�— I I __ � i
�` �� — - � I � �i �
o- ; /�`_ ' 9o,�sraE�s� �.�a� � �. ��. � ,
� ' �� � �� /( �� �:��
J-'�� /� � ' ' .;; N �� I I ,, ,"'j �' .
�� � ! � t't �w �aa nv� sc# � ! �--�.
7 ' i / — _. _ �'�'
f , —z_�
� _ , � P '
� w+. — . � � .�, r
�/ � . "T"' �- - � ,� ',� � ! /� ���'.�
�
o roc aoo
�
Hori.onta' ' leln F=ei
i ,_
I —
�
\}
.J �»J+.«-...�,a � samsraEErsa.
��� �, � _ �' —8
� �
'� �'�� , �� � _t
� �EF �� ° 'l� r—� � — �
AYFSp �
� � � �
, -�` �
... _ _: . _ _
-..�, ��� �_ -� �
� BQLTC3N 8.. MEIVK INC_
c sue+r q g & s y
Existing Street Construction Dates
LEGENi4:
� CONSYRUCTEU 1979
CONSFRUCTED 19$7
CQNS�RUCTED 1988
CONSTRUCTEd 1989
� CIINSTRUCTED 1990
� CQNS�RUCTE61991
� CONSyRUC7ED 1993
� CONSTRUCTED 1994
CONSTRUCTED 1997
•�u�• NEIGHBORHDODBOUND�ARY�
PAVEMENT OISTR{CT
neairnce esrnres aoomou amo ai nczwaeo sm
�
COTTAGEGROVE,MINNESpTA
2014 PAWENENT MANAGEM ENT PRO;ECT
BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 11
i, -
� i i � � � �
� �� � � � �� �i � � � �. � � 4.i"n;'e1ER:�
�
-- - 1
� �,�+ - ° 1
f r�'� �` — �
� � ��€r�, �.
� A t----` �
�!,�s �`` - '�a. _ _ i i
�r r � �
r. � � �, � !� � �
r
Q -
+.w: r '� �
�' , � y p I " � LEG��NL1:
,43 ;TA�Er b¢. �
� _ .. ... �.�� � � � � ; � .� , �� ,,� , , ;� -��-����- =�� i
40iH STPEE' i4j � � � � � i � !A �� �� i i �a �� � I^ A � ! r � � IA f � ■
I 4 ..
� ' .:� � ; .. � ;epE.IL:vE.53 .}~ �.
�— i ° __� � �� � � �#�
� ` 1
�� � � � w a � �� i ._ ��
' � � r
� � � �- s , aeeis�c. ---_ r _��
_ � �ry � � � �� � ,. -- + --_
.. -- - _ -.. - . . _ .� . i ���-
�— .__. - - ��r�+=�
� IJ
�
$
� �
, � I ❑
�-
i` � \\
� � i --� . � � ,�.- �
"— Y � _ � _ ��`'� ', , { �
� � �' , '
4 ,� • �
� I sH.a;.i���ri�„•� � a'� �
y. � � uBSSaS7v��E`St]- � . - � � t �
1 , � -� , � � � ' # t
� � � ��� . j �-., � -�� �-�-� �
� � �� � � � �. � �� � � �.� , . . �
� . - 1 � - �� � -- .. - . �
� �
� � � - - � � �. �� . ,. . � �
� . . ' — _ - _ _ t � �. .EaclN Nc,O — I
_ ¢ ��� a
' APp ll Avt 3+1 i - --- 4 , � ,
i:...i--� � � l•�F.i ^..�-�-a i'i '�? �..f�� -� � � i ���. i.�.. � �� � ��-�� i..� � ��
I I
I
}ix� a�qVEMEhT C�1NC7�1'"I�N i�ATI :��(,
-, 5�
55
bQ
L�5
� � � RAt'EME"tiT f�15'RI{T
Pavement Condition Index Map
y R
� . .— � : � ...�Sq _ � " , � �
� , . � �. � . .._ f - ��� - �� �' I .. �
�.�� �� � i � '�R� y � 92N9 STRE_R
n � _ �� 42'n' _TP.E�54. . _.. i� ,'_�a,�� / ...:A. I ■
I���''``'�`�`� � � 1
LJ � '�l s ; tiwv � '`� `�3-
�--? I k �'
. , �'� � �� • 1�'�, ,i ,-` 1
� � ���7 � •.'„��,�"�',���/ �• 1
�— I � -�� � ,� , s��:. � _ 1
� � � j� � ' 1
PA'JEFAENT❑ISTRVLTFd -----
I
BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 12
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Streets: Based on the deteriorated condition of the eiisting paving, t�-pes of distress
present and the anticipated deterioration due to asphalt stripping, the streets �vithin
the project area are proposed to undergo a full paveinent removal and repllceinent
��ith 3.� inches of ne�v paveinent. Eiisting concrete cl�rb and �utter �� undergo spot
replaceinent as needed.
Sanitar�- Se«-er: Inline repairs �vill be made to fii cracics ��-ithin the pipe. Eiisting
pipe sags creatin� back-ups �ti-i11 be removed and replaced. Eiisting concrete adjusting
rings �tiill be replaced �vith ne�v HDPE adjusting rings to conform to current standards.
The se�ver inanhole castings �vill be salvaged and reinstalled.
Water Main: Valve boies ��-ith dainaged top sections ��ill have the top section
replaced. Concrete h�-drant access pads ��i11 be installed at all h�
Storin Se��-er: Inline repairs �vill be done to address craciced pipes and leaking or
offset joints. Structures in poor condition �� be replaced. Miscellaneous structure
patching, lining and other repairs ��ill be performed as needed.
Storin Water Ou11it�T: Since there «i11 be no increlse of iinpervious surfacing, no
storin �� ql�alit�- iinproveinents are reql�ired.
Trail: A�� ood-chip trail for the green space bet« een the residential neighborhood and
the ne«- Wal-Mart on E1st Point Douglas Road is proposed to be constructed.
BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 13
_� _ _
ui_ h :�FF' ".'i. � �� � � ! _ � � i � � �� ^ � ! � � i r � � � � �� ��� ! � i� If � i ! � �r � i # � i f �i � � s0 :LT'_
� __ i y , ` � �
�� � - —
� I i �.._ .. ^, iWRea, a��4so:...,' �---- , n I i -- r � ,`, � �' �
_ ,
} � � p ' K.T� � I � : . .I"_ � .
1 I-�� � -�� � I _� I-"_� .
-� I 4` �
' I , } �' I I{�� .
I
}
�� , ���I L � Yq� + �� ' '�
���� ,� �
. f
6:
� � nl � �+��� �' � ''� :�� _ ' ' t � � �
, �
,- ��� - � + � �
'
y . .. � - , , � _ .
, J
' ' ,
7� �
�
.�
� -n «+S ' ' ,:.., ., � 7 . .. � F � ;� � .
_ � �
�
•. ; �_ r .. . ' - ___� . . �
;' : i - '
� � � � GE�=n��?:
- — -__ _
; r � „, `'� �— a — I `_ -- - ' t
_ ��-- � � _ _ `'�� ���� '
E - - � � ` !,� _ ' i' � [
f a� � . —�� � � � ` r � — � �a� rvv N a-��A
�� � I �, � � � � F � F f I � �� � T_ c�;�n€ti �
, F
� � � � � � � �/ , . , �. . PR�Pi75ED TRAIL
� : n
, 5q 1
_ I�l � _ - - � "� '� �
� ' � --- �, j , , �, �;
� c , �s � FU7URE TRAIL
I� �� � _ _-- � i v�r� srperra
� � � r � � PAVEMEhiT [7RSTFI�.T
� � � �;�. '`` 1 �` - � �
� � ' 2N6 TkE /�: rr ,:i
..'�� - � 'Y`�� � . -_ .._ —' _ �4[4�. � ` � `il �`� � �
� ��� � � p � : ��r � ,
- � � .�� � � - . . . ��� .�
� �r������ 1 ` ,
� I � :, �" � �_ '
l..�J � � -
�, � �--_ __ ' 1
� - '�
� i � ' � .� � - - �� `�
� � ' - � � �__ �� 't ., : �
. y _ `I� •�+1 �� yk�:� � �_ - � .
■ 4�
■ 1 �
�e1 �
: �nvE�nEn�raisr�ic��a --------:�1 - � � �'— � �':► 1 1
� � � i iA 1�� - .�i � � � � � �
� - �� � ' '� ��i� �
� ��' � � �' . . '
�
� :. �� �` '``.. ; - ' �
�
� �
'M tl - I �-' .'. ' . :. . -�.""._ -. _'. _' . _ .. � 1 �� JfPGEN PL50. -
_
_ �
. � — ._- - � �y 1
a __ _
� - ' � r"nl `? e .:, i : . �r _ . .,. _. — , �
, . � .. � � I ' �- -
Y _
, � � �� � � � � � i � � �� # � !�� � �� � ��� a � �� � `� � ! � i-i ! i. ... ..
. . .. � ` �'\, . .. . . . . �-.�-- - ,-� �� . _ _- __ _' ..
�� � �,� ,_ - --�__
Proposed Improvements Map
BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 14
HIGHEST AND BEST USE
Highest and Best Use - Before Proposed Improvements
As Vacant: In the clse of all the subject properties, the highest and best use, as
vacant, is for single-fainil�- residential purposes. The properties are located in an
established sin�le-famil�- area, zoned and guided for residential pl�rposes.
As Iinproved: OnI�T the land coinponents of the sub,ject properties 1re being appraised.
Therefore, the highest and best use, as iinproved, is not addressed.
Highest and Best Use - After Proposed Improvements
After the proposed street and utilit� iinprovements are completed, the highest and best
l�se of the sl�bject properties is l�nchanged relative to the before iinprovements
position.
BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 15
SPECIAL BENEFIT CONSIDERATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
1. Before the proposed improveinents, the streets in the project area are old and
deteriorated. According to the engineering report by Bolton & Menlc, Inc., the
present plveinent condition of the project streets is t�-piclll�- rated bet«een �0 and
60, based on a scale of 1 to 100, ��-ith 100 representing top condition. It can be
anticipated that further deterioration �vill result in a�� orsenin� of problems
associated �� ith advanced age. including accelerated asphalt stripping, improper
drainage, uneven driving surfaces, increased formation of potholes, etc.
2. It is recognized that the condition and ql�alit�- of streets serving and fronting
residential properties influences the value, curb appeal and general desirabilit�- of
the properties.
3. The proposed rehabilitation of roads serving the subject properties ��-i11
substantially improve the safet�-, convenience and general appeal of access into and
out of the subject properties. The project «-i11 reverse the deteriorating state of the
eiisting streets and result in ne« surfacing, and in some areas, replacement of
deteriorated concrete curb and �utter.
4. Safet�r aspects for vehicles traveling on a rehabilitated street are enhanced b�- the
eliinination of potholes, cracics, etc. Street icing probleins are reduced as «ater is
inore efficientl�- diverted off the road�tia�- surface that could other��ise collect in
the deteriorated street areas during frost seasons.
�. The proposed project iinproveinents in some areas ina�- resl�lt in some general
benefit to neighborhoods and properties be�-ond the iininediate subject
neighborhoods. Ho«ever, a significant ainount of benefit resulting froin the
pro,ject is special, attachin� to the properties directl�- fronting and accessin� the
rehabilitated streets, including the subject properties.
6. The special benefit accruing to each of the properties in the project area can var<<
some�vhat froin propert�r to propert�T. This is due to differences ainong the
properties ��ith respect to lot size, lot value, highest and best use (e.g., �vhether
tracts can be subdivided). and �tihether the propert�- appraised fronts more than one
street, ainong other factors.
BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 16
SPECIAL BENEFIT ANALYSIS PROCESS
Arriving at an opinion of special value benefits accrl�ing to each of the sl�bject
properties as a result of coinpletion of the Cit�r of Cottage Grove 2014 Paveinent
Management Project is accomplished bv developing "before improvements" and "after
improvements" opinions of marlcet value for each of the subject land parcels. The
iinprovements on the land are concluded to have the same vall�e contributions to the
total propert5� value in both the "before and after" iinproveinents positions.
Consequentl�-, the eitent of special value benefits from the public iinproveinents
project can be reliabl�- derived b�- anal�zing the value of the land onl�T, by processing
the Direct Sales Coinparison Approach.
The Direct Sales Coinparison Approach, �vhich involves the comparison of recentl�-
sold land parcels similar to the appraised propert�-, is applied to the valuation of each
of the sl�bject properties. The comparable sale prices are anal�-zed and adjustments
are made for value-related differences relative to the subject propert5�. The result of
the an1l�-sis �nd adjustments is the generation of 1 range of value indications for the
subject land. The strengths and ��ealcnesses of each coinparable sale and its value
indication are evall�ated before arriving at a final value opinion for the subject land
parcel.
Retained in the appraisers' office work file for this assigninent are inarlcet data, notes
and other supportin� information pertaining to the processing of the Direct Sales
Comparison Approach in a before-and-after land value anal�-sis for the subject
properties. Sho���n belo��- is the result of this analvsis, presenting the opinion of the
special benefit values as of Deceinber 5, 2013 resulting from the Cit�T of Cottage
Grove 2014 Paveinent Manageinent Project.
SPECIAL BENEFIT OPINIONS
City of Cottage Grove 2014 Pavement Management Project
# Address Opinion of Special Benefit
1 9129 Janie Avenue South $4,100
2 9063 Jensen Avenue South $4,600
3 9254 Jareau Avenue South $4,600
4 9236 Jergen Court South $5,000
EXPOSURE TIME
Exposure time is defined as "the estimated length of time that the property interest
being appraised «ould have been offered on the marlcet prior to the h�-pothetical
consummation of a sale at market value on the effective date of the appraisal" (Source:
2012-2013 Uniform Standards of Appraisal Practice, Page U-3). The eiposure time
for each of the subject properties is estiinated at three to sii inonths.
BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 17
CERTIFICATION
The undersigned does hereby certify that in this appraisal report:
1. This appraisal assignment is not based on a requested minimum valuation or specific
valuation for approval of a loan. The opinion of marlcet �•alue identified in this report
�� as deeeloped independent of an�� undue influence.
2. Neither our engagement to malce this appraisal (or anti- future appraisals for this
client). nor any compensation, therefore, are contingent upon the de�-elopment or
report of a predetermined ��alue or direction in ��alue that fa�°ors the cause of the client,
the amount of �•alue estimate, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of
a subsequent event directlti� related to the intended use of the appraisal.
3. Our engagement in this assignment �i�as not contingent upon de��eloping or reporting
predetermined results.
4. We ha��e no present or contemplated future interest in the real estate that is the subject
of this appraisal report.
�. We haee no personal interest or bias ���ith respect to the subject matter of this appraisal
report or the parties in�Tolved.
6. To the best of our lcno�vledge and belief the statements of fact contained in this
appraisal report upon ��-hich the analy�ses, opinions and conclusions elpressed herein
are based, are true and correct.
7. The reported analy�ses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only bti� the reported
assumptions and limiting conditions. and are our personal, impartial, and unbiased
anal�-ses, opinions, and conclusions.
8. This appraisal report has been made in conformity ��-•ith and is subject to the
requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct
of the Appraisal Institute, and the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice.
9. No one pro�: ided significant professional assistance to the persons signing this
certification.
10. We have made a personal inspection of the propert_y� that is the subject of this report.
11. The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating
to reeie��� bv its dulv authorized representati� es.
12. As of the date of this report. Paul J. Gleason has completed the Standards and Ethics
Education Requirement of the Appraisal Institute for Associate Members.
13. The bv-la���s and regul<�tions of the Appraisal Institute goeern disclosure of the
contents of this appraisal report.
ld. Neither all nor an�� part of the contents of this report (especiall�� an�- conclusions as to
value, the identity- of the appraiser or the firm «-ith ��-hich he is connected, or any-
reference to the Appraisal Institute or MAI designation) shall be disseminated to the
public through adaertising media, public relations media, ne�i�s media, sales media, or
any- other public means of communication ���ithout the prior ���ritten consent and
appro�°al of the undersigned.
1�. We have the l�no���ledge and elperience to complete this appraisal in <� coinpetent
manner. Neither our companti�, nor ourselves individually�, have been sued b�� a
regulator�� agency or financial institution for fraud or negligence in�-o1��°ing an
appraisal report.
16. No ser� ices as an appraiser or in an�� other capacit�� ha�-e been performed regarding the
property that is the subject of the report ���ithin the three ti�ear period immediately
preceding acceptance of this assignment.
�
;� r;
°'�� �"� �'%.
r� � �
�� - + ? ,; .
� 4'���""'' ���
� � � � �� � �, p ` � �, �� G �
Paul 7. Glea�o.n William E. Petersen
Certified Ueneral Real Propert� Appraiser Certified Ueneral Real Property� Appraiser
Minnesota License #�003073 Minnesota License #4001649
BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 18
PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS
PAUL J. GLEASON
PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS AND ASSOCIATIONS
Candidate for Designation — The Appraisal Institute
To d1te, all required courses for Appraisll Institute MAI designation have been
talcen and course eiaminations passed; Coinprehensive Eiainination for MAI
designation has been passed: Eiperience Requirement has been completed.
APPRAISER LICENSE
Certified General Real Property Appraiser — State of Minnesota —
License #4003073
EDUCATION
University of Wisconsin at La Crosse, Wisconsin — 1985
Blchelor of Science Degree in Business Adininistration
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Principal — BRI�W Appraisals, Inc., St. Paul, MN, 2007-present
Staff Appraiser — BRKW Appraisals, Inc., St. Pal�l, MN, 1993-2006
Apprliser — Certified Appraisers, Eicelsior, MN, 1993
Appraiser — Stiles Appraisals, Inc., Plvmouth, MN, 1992-1993
Ezpert Witness Testimony° — For real estate litigation in numerous condeinnation
commissioners' hearings, arbitration hearings and in District Court
Presenter/Speaker at Minnesota Department of Transportation's 2012 Right Of Way
Professionals Worlcshop, Brainerd, MN
Presenter/Speaker at Minnesota Department of Transportation's 2010 Right Of Way
Professionals Worlcshop. Breez�- Point, MN
Appraisal assigninents have been coinpleted for the follo��ing purposes:
Condeinnition — Partial and total acquisitions, in fee title 1nd in easeinent forin
Propert�- Damage Claiins Litigation
Specill Benefits V1luation
Mortgage Financing
General Valuation Needs — Purchase negotiations, listing prices, internal fainil��
or partnership transactions, estate plannin�/taies, inarriage dissolution, etc.
BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 19
Professional Qualifications — Paul J. Gleason
PROPERTY TYPES APPRAISED
Page 2
Land — Coininercial, industrial, residential acreage, agricultural, finished lots
Coininercial Buildings — Office, industrial, retail, inedical office, auto dealerships
Apartment Buildings/Complezes
1-4 Fainil�- Residential — Single-fainil�- hoine, to��nhoine, condo, duplei, fourplei
PROFESSIONAL REAL ESTATE STUDIES
Appraisal Institute courses, including all required for MAI designation:
Course 110: Appraisal Principles (eiainination passed)
Course 120: Appraisal Procedures (eiainination passed)
Course 210: Residential Case Studti-
Course 310: Basic Incoine Capitalization
Course 410: National Uniforin Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice
Course 420: Business Practices and Ethics
Course � 10: Advanced Income Capitalization
Course 520: Highest and Best Use and Mlrket An1l�rsis
Course �30: Advanced Sales Coinparison and Cost Approaches
Course �40: Report Writing and Valuation Anal�-sis
Course �50: Advanced Applic�tions
Nuinerous additional classes and seininars for appraisal pre-license and continuing
education requireinents, on an ongoing basis, froin Appraisal Institute and other
sources
CLIENTS INCLUDE
Cities of Afton, Austin, Apple Valle�r, Cainbridge, Cottage Grove. Eagan, Inver
Grove Heights, Lino L11ces. Maple��-ood. Oak Parlc Heights, O«atonna, Prior Lalce.
Robbinsdale, Rochester, Savage, Wabasha and Woodbur�-
Anchor Banlc
BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Associated B1nlc
Breiner Banlc
Doughert�r, Molenda, Solfest, Hills & Ecicberg, Laininers, Briggs, Wolff
Bauer, P.A. & Vierling, PLLP
Greene Espel PLLP
Minnesota Dept. of Transportation
Minnesota Banlc & Trl�st
Spire Federal Credit Union
US Banlc
And various other individuals, attorne�rs, coinmunities 1nd counties
Revised: June 2013
BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 20
PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS
WILLIAM E. PETERSEN
APPRAISER LICENSE
Certified General Real Property Appraiser - State of Minnesota - License
#4001649
EDUCATION
D.D.S. Degree, School of Dentistr�-, Universit�r of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
1970
St. Paul Central High School, St. Paul, MN 1963
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE/EMPLOYMENT HISTORY
St1ff Appraiser — BRILW APPRAISALS, INC., St. P1u1, MN, April 1996 - Present
Staff Appraiser - Dahlen & D��yer, Inc., St. P�ul, MN, Noveinber 1986 - March
1996
Dentist, Northparlc Dental Clinic; Blaine, MN, Ju1�- 1972 - November 1986
Dentist, U.S. Arin�-. Julv 1970 - Jul�T 1972
Appraisal assigninents have been coinpleted for the follo«ing pi�rposes:
Mortgage financing
Condemnation/Liti�ation
Client ConsL�ltation
REO Portfolio Valuation
Estate V1luation Bu�-/Sell Decisions
PROPERTY TYPES APPRAISED
Apartinent Buildings Manufacturing Buildings Recreation Facilities
Auto Service Centers Medical Clinics Restaurants
B�nlcs Mini-Storage Retail Stores
Churches Miied Use Properties To��nhoines
Office Buildings
Office-Sho�� rooins
Office-Warehouses
Subdivision Land
Shopping Centers
Single Fainil�� Hoines
Special Purpose Properties
Railroad Corridors
Convenience Stores
Dealerships
Gas Stations
Vacant Land
BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 21
Professional Qualifications — William E. Petersen
PROFESSIONAL REAL ESTATE STUDIES
Page 2
S.R.E.A. Course 101: "Introduction to Appraising Real Property", 1987
S.R.E.A. Course 102: "Applied Residential Property Valuation", 1988
S.R.E.A. Course 201: "Principles of Income Property Appraising", 1987
S.R.E.A. Course 202: "Applied Income Property Valuation", 1989
Appraisal Institute Course 410: "Standards of Professional Practice (Part A)", 1991
Appraisal Institute Course 420: "Standards of Professional Practice (Part B)", 1991
Advanced Yield Capitalization, Prosource, 1993
Ho��- to Avoid Environinental Hlzards Liabilitv. Prosource, 1994
Discoiinted Cash Flo�v An�1�-sis, Universitv of St. Thoinas, 1994
Appraisal 20�: Office and Retail Appraisal, Prosource, 199�
Appraisal Institute Course 430: "Standards of Professional Practice (Part C)", 2001
2003 National USPAP Standards and Ethics Update, Prosource, 2003
200� National USPAP Update Course, Appraisal Institute 2005
2006 National USPAP Update Course, Appraisal Institute 2007
2008 National USPAP Update Course, Appraisal Institute 2009
2010 National USPAP Upolte Course, Appraisll Institute 20ll
2012 National USPAP Update Course, Appraisal Institute 2013
Subdivision Valuation, Appraisal Institute 2009
Anal�rzing Tenlnt Credit Rislc and Coininercial Le1se Anal�Tsis. Appraisal Institute 2011
Various other short courses and seininars.
CLIENTS INCLUDE
Anchor Banlc
Breiner Banlc
Dalcota Count�% Communit� Dev. Agenc�
Minneapolis CPED
Ramseti Count�-
U.S. Banlc
BMO Harris Banlc
Central Bank
Hennepin CoL�ntv
Minnesota Departinent of Transportation
TCF Banlc
Wells Fargo Banlc
Various municipalities, la�v firms; builders, developers, and investors
Revised: June 2013
BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 22
COMPANY PROFILE
BRKW APPRAISALS, INC.
1600 Universit� Avenue, Suite 314
St. Paul, Minnesota 5� 104
Phone: 651-646-6 ll 4
Fai: 651 646-8086
email: brlc�v�c��brlt«.coin
Website: ���v�v.brk��.com
BRKW Appraisals. Inc. (forinerl�- kno«n as Bettendorf Rohrer Knoche Wall, Inc.) is a
full service professional real estate appraisll coinpan�- formed in 1991. The three
principals have inore than 90 �-ears of coinbined eiperience in the valuation of a��-ide
variet� of real estate. Located in the Mid�tia�- area of St. Paul, �tie concentrate on the
appraisal of real estate priinaril�- in the T«�in Cities Metropolitan Area, as �vell as
outl�-ing cominunities in Minnesota.
Our eitensive professional training and e�perience enable l�s to provide the eipertise
necessar�- for consistently reliable real estate valuation. Our appraisal reports are
confidential docuinents coinpleted in accordlnce �vith all current standards of
professional appraisal practice and ethics. All of the appraisers emplo� ed b�- the
coinpan� have the Certified General Real Propert� Appraiser license froin the State of
Minnesota. Our appraisers sta�- current �vith advances in appraisal techniques and the
changing real estate inarlcet through continuing education progrlins.
At BRIKW Appraisals, Inc. �tie strive to bl�ild and maintain long-lasting relationships
�� ith our clients. Our goal is to provide high-qualitST professional real estate valuation
services in 1 tiinel�- inanner that is consistent «-ith the needs of our clients.
Appraisal & Consultin� Services
Real Estate Appraisals
Mortgage Financing Appraisals
Condemnation/Litigation Appraisals
Revie� Appraisals
Real Estate Tas Abateinents
Special Benefits Anal�-sis
Espert Witness Testimon�=
REO Portfolio Valuation
Feasibilit�- Studies
Marlcet Surve�-s
Partial Interest Valuations
Property Types
Commercial Properties
Multiple Famil�r Residential
Single Fainilv Residential
Subdivision Anal�Tsis
Vacant Land Parcels
Special Purpose Properties
Gas Statioii / Coiivenience Stores
Schools and ChL�rches
Recreation Facilities
Railroad Corridors
BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 23
APPRAISAL STAFF
Michael J. Bettendorf, MAI — Principal
Active as an appraiser since 1971, Michael has the MAI designation of the Appraisal
Institute and specializes in commerciaL industrial, multiple f�mi1�-, residentiaL and
special purpose propert�� appraisals �ti-ith eitensive litigation eiperience. Court
appointed Coinmissioner in Ramse�- Count�-, past President of Minnesota Chapter
A.I.R.E.A. (1987). instructor of appraisal courses and seininars. Michael is a graduate
of St. John's Universit�T. Licensed as a Certified General Real Propert�T Appraiser.
Marc E. Knoche, MAI — Principal and Managing Partner
Marc has been an appraiser since 1982, and has the MAI designation of the Appraisal
Institute. He specializes in coininercial, industrial, inultiple famil�-. residential, vacant
land, and special purpose propert�r appraisals. Marc has done numerous condemnation
acquisition appraislls and speci�l benefit studies involving a���ide varietv of propert�T
t�-pes. Marc has eitensive litigation / eipert «itness eiperience and has served as a
court appointed coinmissioner. He is a Past President of the Metro/Minnesota Chapter
of the Appraisal Institute (1992 c� 1993). A graduate of Macalester College, Marc is
licensed b�- the State of Minnesota as a Certified General Real Propert�- Appraiser.
Paul J. Gleason — Principal
Paul has been appraising re11 estate since 1992. He has in-depth ezperience in the
�aluation of nuinerous real estate propert�- t�-pes. Over the �-ears, he has developed
special ezpertise in the valuation of land and in eininent doinain appraising. Paul is a
graduate of the Universit�- of Wisconsin at La Crosse. C�ndidate for Designation of
the Appraisal Institute and licensed as a Certified Gener�l Real Property- Apprliser.
Sean P. Butts — Associate
Sean began appraising in 1992, specializing in coininercial, industrial, inultiple famil�T,
residential and recreational propert�- (e.b., golf courses). and joined our firin in 1997.
After leaving BRILW Appraisals in 2006 for CSM Corpor�tion, �vhere he spent sii
�-e1rs in asset valuation and manageinent, Sean returned to BRI�W in 2012 to resuine
independent fee appraisal ���ork. Sean is a graduate of St. Cloud State Universit��� ���ith
a Business degree «ith emphasis on Real Estate Appraising. Licensed as a Certified
General Real Propertti- Appraiser and a Candid�te for Designation of the Appraisal
Institute .
BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 24
Joseph P. Deutsch — Associate
Joe has been appraising real estate since 1998, specializing in cominercial properties.
Types of propert�- appraised include multi-fainil�-, industrial, office, retail, and special
purpose properties. Joe �vorked for t��-o �-ears as a cit�T building inspector prior to
becoming an appraiser. Joe is a graduate of the Universit�T of Minnesota majoring in
accounting and is a Certified General Real Propert�- Appraiser as �tiell as a Candidate
for Designation of the Appraisal Institute.
Terry A. Ward — Associate
Terr�T has over 20 �-ears of eiperience in business inanageinent, operations and
inarlceting. Since 2002, she began appl�-ing this eiperience to coininercial real estate
appraising. Types of properties appraised include office, industrial, hoteUinotel,
retail/coinmercial, and other special use properties. She has a degree in Business
Management froin St. Cloud State Universit�- and a Mini Masters Degree in Real Estate
Appraisin� froin St. Thoinas Universit�r. Terr�r is a Certified General Real Propert�-
Appraiser and a Practicing Affiliate of the Appraisal Institi�te.
Mark A. Warren — Associate
Mark is a third-generation real propert�- appraiser and h1s been appraising since 2003.
TSTpes of propert�- appraised include office, industrial, hotel/inotel, retaiUcoinmercial,
and other special use properties. Marlc is a graduate of the Universit�- of Minnesota. is
a Candidate for Designation of the Appraisal Institute. and is licensed as a Certified
General Real Propert�T Appraiser.
William E. Petersen — Associate
Bill has been an active appraiser since 1986 specializing in the valuation of
coininercial, industrial, inulti-fainil��, office and special purpose properties. Bill is a
graduate of the Universitv of Minnesota and practiced dentistr�- froin 1970-1986
before becoming licensed as a Certified General Real Propert�� Appraiser.
BRKW APPRAISALS, INC. PAGE 25