HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-02-19 PACKET 04.E.REQUEST OF CITY COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL AGENDA
MEETING ITEM #�
DATE 2/19/14 . �
PREPARED BY Parks and Recreation Zac Dockter
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT HEAD
******��**�***********************�*����**���***
COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST
Consider accepting the contents of and place on file the 2014 Cottage Grove Athletic Facility
Improvements Plan.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Accept the contents of and place on file the 2014 Cottage Grove Athletic Facility
Improvements Plan.
BUDGET IMPLICATION: $0 $0
BUDGETED AMOUNT ACTUAL AMOUNT
ADVISORY COMMISSION ACTION
DATE
❑ PLANNING
❑ PUBLIC SAFETY
❑ PUBLIC WORKS
� PARKS AND RECREATION 2/10/14
❑ HUMAN SERVICES/RIGHTS
❑ ECONOMIC DEV. AUTHORITY
❑
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
//
■
■
■
■
/1
MEMO/LETTER:
RESOLUTION:
ORDINANCE:
ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION:
LEGAL RECOMMENDATION:
REVIEWED
❑
❑
❑
�
❑
❑
❑
APPROVED
❑
❑
❑
�
❑
❑
❑
OTHER: 2014 Cottage Grove Athletic Facility Improvement Plan
ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS
" City Administrator
DENIED
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
,
� � �
Date
�****************************�*****************�
H:�zdockter\CGAA\Work Plans\Council Action Form-Athletic Facility Improvements Plan.doc
Cat�age
� Grove
�h�►'Q Pride and �rtosPerity Meet
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Zac Dockter, Parks and Recreation Director
CC: Ryan Schroeder, City Administrator
Date: February 11, 2014
Subject: Athletic Facility Improvement Plan
Introduction/Background
In 2005, the City conducted a Recreational Facility Needs Study that evaluated existing
recreational facilities and future recreational needs. The City has been using that study as a
guide for park improvements and expansion. Although the study still provides strategic
direction for the parks system, staff has identified a need to review the athletic facility needs
component in order to adapt to the many changes in the community since 2005.
Staff has been meeting with leaders of the Cottage Grove and East Ridge Athletic
Associations to develop a five-year Athletic Facility Improvement Plan. During those
discussions, youth athletic leaders from each division were invited to share concerns and
provide suggestions for improvement that would help in improving athletic experiences in
Cottage Grove. The plan is a compendium of those discussions. Further, staff has discussed
this draft of the plan with the School District to assure understanding and cooperation towards
the end goal of improved athletic facilities across all public property.
The plan does not guarantee funding for any of the directives listed, rather it aids in prioritizing
needs for consideration during budget and capital improvement planning.
The Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources has recommended that the City Council accept
the contents of and place on file the 2014 Cottage Grove Athletic Facility Improvement Plan.
Staff Recommendation
Consider accepting the contents of and place on file the 2014 Cottage Grove Athletic Facility
Improvements Plan.
provem 1Nork Plan
INTRODUCTION
The Cottage Grove Parks and Recreation Department recognizes the need to periodically
evaluate their athletic facilities to determine current and future needs. With a high percentage
of Cottage Grove residents impacted by youth athletics programming in any given year, these
recreational facilities contribute heavily towards building a healthy, active, social, livable and
family-friendly community. The necessity of ensuring these facilities are safe and well-
maintained to meet the recreational needs of the community is the primary purpose of this
report.
The last Recreational Facility Needs Study was performed in
Ingraham & Associates, a planning and design firm. The s
for managing parks and recreational growth. However e�'
the economy slowed and delayed community grow -�
plan have been accomplished, the long-term visio ��= e p
adjustments necessary. This Athletic Facility .x -�vements P
addendum to the 2005.Recreation Facility � Study.
Within the City, athletic facilities are on bo 0
a key element to the success of this plan will b#
delivering the desired results. lan will hope
the School and City by providin ission of
STUDY PROCESS
Staff presented t
November of 20�
representativ �
hockey and bas r
chose not to be in
land
;ain ;
05. It was composed by
�ut into place a solid framework
after the study was completed,
ns. Although many goals of the
mains intact with fairly limited
r� designed to act as an
owned pr >-#'es. For that reason,
�rt of the sch ����� ��� strict in
�p a positive rela } ship between
play experiences in the community.
• Cottag � Athle � sociation (CGAA) board in
er, ff m out thletic group
uss •�= and I#: rm needs and desires. Both
� invit •> participate. Given their unique situations, they
rt. Hoc �� enefits from the recent expansion of the
' curr §. eeds along with future growth potential for
o g� sj 3 si = for their program with the exception of
�r cou hey did not propose any suggested changes to
Id improve their programming. Further, discussions with
�s etic Association were held as those groups are key users
TREND ANAL ' �
The past five ye :- y=�k -thletic participation has shown a fairly neutral trend. Most of that
can be contribute =� --:- ession in the economy which essentially limited community growth.
Also, the formations he East Ridge Athletic Association, Club Programs and Lacrosse have
changed the dynamics of community-based youth athletics.
The East Ridge Athletic Association (ERAA) primarily focuses on traveling programs. Thus, their
impact on CGAA recreational programs remains minimal. However, traveling-age families are
faced with the choice of playing for the community or the high school boundary in which they
reside. The facility use policy adopted by Cottage Grove calls for the percentage of field access
to ERAA to be directly equivalent to the percentage of Cottage Grove residents registered in that
given sport. To date, ERAA utilizes the current Cottage Grove facilities:
ERAA Baseball: Peter Thompson Park, CG Middle School #52, Hamlet Park #3 (periodic)
ERAA Softball: CG Elementary, Lamar (periodic)
ERAA Soccer: Kingston (periodic)
The depletion of community-based athletic programs also has an impact on program
participation and facility use. In sports such as soccer and softball, club-based programs have
become very popular. Club-based programs have no city or school based affiliation and can
draw participants from anywhere. However, they usually identify a home field/community for
their given team(s). Currently, usage of Cottage Grove fields by these groups is fairly minimal.
However, it will likely become a larger portion of facility usa .��e with each passing season.
Lacrosse is the fastest growing youth sport in Min
more than doubled its registrations in Cottage Grc
popularity grows within the athletic culture of M�
rt. Further, the formation of a gi
Providing fields for the growth �
Each of the sports needs to have a vision for
are the long-term visions for e=._ort:
Baseball: The Hamlet Park expan�
10+ years. Tball through Pee Wee
past four years, lacrosse has
cted to continually rise as its
;t recently become a high
erate more opportunity in
� x ered a high priority.
munity's
. Below
th of the traveling program for
within future park and school
ing.
ct to identify its best opportunity
complex are viabl
ark as well as the Grey Cloud Elementary
�th cycle. Analysis of location, land acquisition,
s fiel� _� s. However, future growth should be identified
aps as part of a Lamar Park expansion project. Further,
'o3�uld provide the opportunity to maximize use on existing
ed multiple opportunities for field growth. However,
3e made within each new community park that develops in the East
h soccer fields is also a necessary consideration.
Football: Football is able to meet its needs within given facilities. However, football also needs
to be prepared for growth as well as field rest needs. They have identified several options that
would support the long-term development of the program.
WORK PLANS/PRIORITIES
A worl< plan for each sport was developed between staff and the appointed sport division
representative. The goal was to identify specific one to five-year needs as well as on-going and
long-term needs. Through the report compilation, staff made a point of prioritizing the
problems or issues that each sport was hoping to address in this effort. A summary of those
priorities are as follows:
Baseball: Complete Hamlet Park expansion project, improve existing fields, and identify
opportunities for indoor practice space/artificial turf.
Softball: Improve existing facilities at Grey Cloud/CGMS, identify solution to long-term need for
softball specific complex, and identify opportunities for indoor practice space/artificial turf.
Football: Improve turf conditions at Hamlet to provide add
identify future sites for program growth.
Soccer: Continued improvement of turf manage
feasibility of artificial turf for one or two outdoo
Lacrosse: Improve Hillside turf condition
addition of two or more lacrosse fields ii
practice space/artificial turf.
WORK SCHEDULE
Supplemental to the Work Pla
2013 (completed work)
1. West Dra
2. Kingsto � .
3. Pine � �: - e Pai
4. Hamlet ° . • re
5. Implemen ._
.6.. s rll�ide Scho .
gram growth with
ortunities for indoor
rl<schedule is provided below:
ccer field
�ement plan across all parks
= date adjustments to lacrosse field to improve
ds personnel to review worl< plan, set goals and identify
o=__ unities for �: P nerships
2. Pine ��;= Park: co..� �. te maintenance strips/pads
3. Belden • re = and add concrete maintenance strips/pads to field #10. Reseed
outfield an a Id until 2015 season
4. Woodridge P�: cut infield line on small baseball field to reduce lip
5. Lamar Park: Add power to field #27 light pole and consider power at #26 for machines
6. Hamlet Park: top dress and over-seed Hamlet football main field
7. Grey Cloud School: re-grade fields #47 and #53 to reduce pooling
8. Grey Cloud School: re-arc #46 to extend infield
9. Grey Cloud School: develop turf maintenance/improvement plan with school district
10. Grey Cloud School: install player bench covers on fields #46, 47, 53, 54 as CGAA cost
share permits
11. Grey Cloud School: Plant trees near field #46-#50 for shading
12. CG Middle School: consider turf overhaul and maintenance plan with school district
I quality playing surfaces, and
replace/fix goals, study
13. CG Middle School: resolve field overlap issues with football/soccer on fields #53/54
14. Armstrong: replace player benches
15. Park High School: Regrade softball B-squad field
16. Lacrosse: identify and utilize at least two additional fields for 2014 seasons. Options
include: CG Middle School (inside tracl<), Hamlet North, Highlands East, Kingston #5/6,
West Draw, Park High School (JV Field), future park land.
2015
1
2
3
4.
5.
6.
2016
1.
2.
3.
4,
5.
Belden Parl<: concrete maintenance strips/pads on fi
Hamlet Park: install irrigation to north field for so
fall 2016
Hamlet Park: find alternative storage optio ��
building
Grey Cloud School: install player ben �= ers on fiel
CG Elementary School: turf overha -
s 8/9
�otball. Grad/seed and rest until
sate for demolition of existing
Grey Cloud/CG Middle Schools: _,>_�: uance of improved tu �< agement
Arbor Meadows Park: ' T
Hillside School: concre � �
Grey Cloud School: insta
Grey Cloud School: constr �
Grey Clou� iddle Scho
2017
1. Hillside � : oL• i
2. Perform fe: $'
�e � •, es to
.� ��er ��������Y
2. A=�,-:;.
3. Ana � ���
Baseball 1. Repla
_� MaI<e
Footba I I 1. Id
irrigation `�
ance str
� �� ��P� field
elds
ips/pads/fence capping on fields #20-21
II complex
e�� . o portunity
ity to =• d parking at Arbor Meadows Park
ity for storage facility at Kingston Park
��ufor an artificial turffield at Hamlet Parl<
of Woodridge small field fencing
side a"premier" facility for younger players
�rhaul of Middle School field #51
field options for program growth
Softball 1. Identify future site of athletic complex and purchase land
2. Scoreboards on Grey Cloud/Middle School fields
3. Outfield fencing at Grey Cloud/Middle School fields
nce capping on fields #18-19
fields #48-50
Lacrosse 1. Identify field options for program growth
FUNDING
Many of the tasks identified in this plan can be performed utilizing in-house labor with minimal
impact to the existing operational budgets. However, larger projects requiring more capital may
be reallocated based on funding availability or lack thereof. As part of the newly established
Park Improvements Fund, dedicated funding towards park improvements such as these is now
available. However, it is presumed that the benefactor (baseball, softball, soccer, etc.) should
be prepared to provide at least 25-50% matching funds to bring the project to completion.
Projects that provide all or matching funds will likely be escalated in the work schedule faster
than those that do not. The groups have been made aware . this opportunity and the City is
prepared to work with the Parks Commission and City Co 3: review these requests as they
are presented.
INDOOR ARTIFICIAL TURF
The lacl< of indoor practicing facilities during = 'nter/sprin 3 ths was a recurring theme
across all sports. Currently, indoor practic' u o� ions are limited = ool gymnasiums and the
Park High School Activity Center. Those ;= s are currently filled t * city. Prioritization of
facilities starts with school sponsored prog such as sp rts, educati =y. ncerts, fundraisers,
after school care programs and more. The At Asso �_# ns essentiall all remaining
time available. However, ther ill a significan ond what these � ies are able to
offe r.
Indoor artificial turf facilities are g� 'ng i �° rity thr ut the state and come in forms
such as domes, fie �- � es, wareho =: and ic Most tly, development at the
following facilit'. � e Grove �. e at �� �= ppo the need for indoor turf in
their commu astings - rena, Ea � rena, Grove Ice Arena/Community
Center, Vadnai hts Spo +enter (bu �� �, West St Paul Sports Center (bubble) and the
Bielenberg Field H=- $20 , :'ect sche �> for 2014 completion to replace bubble). The
lad � acilitie � °�� mon > pears to leave Cottage Grove at a
ta � 4 ill pr ion dur ; ea � workouts. With a recent decline in ice
e during wh = � uld b ;� idered "p =x ' indoor turf season, the City should consider
i`� _� r turf on the �'nk as le option for increasing ice arena revenue, increasing
faci s age and incre «, the I� � na's citizen impact by marl<eting to those citizens who
other � ay never uti <: he ice a= a. To assure the sufficient utilization and return on
investme . ive-year ag �� ent should be negotiated with CGAA and other potential users
prior to the ' vesting =�_� this type of programming. The capital expense for indoor
turf/netting wo �� e a=%=x> imately $115,000 with a life expectancy of 20+ years. Below is a
financial forecast nversion from ice to turf each year from the fourth Wednesday of
February through Apr' . Although indoor turf rental would likely take place after those dates,
the weather would play a role and any additional revenue from that should not be relied upon
for this particular financial forecasting exercise.
Revenue
Turf Rental (250 hours) $25 000
Expense
Utility Savings (chiller shutdown) ($10,000)
Ice Rental Revenue (opportunity loss-3yr avg) $23,000
Ice Tournament Concession (opportunity loss) $3,000
NET INCOME
Return on investment
$9,000
11.1 years
This budget forecast shows the potential financial benefit of indoor turf at the Ice Arena. It's
also important to note that utility rates for maintaining the ice sheets are susceptible to increase
and could further sl<ew the utility savings significantly in favor of indoor turf. This is particularly
true for the natural gas necessary to dehumidify and heat th arena during ice-in conditions.
Further, changes in off-season programming for the
negative impact to the arena's ability to sell ice dur'
tournaments and ice rental during March is not as (�
usage has shifted to later in the spring and su •_� .
ockey have made a significant
nth of March. Simply put,
was just five years ago. Ice
Lastly, the addition of indoor turf create ole new user base for ��� ottage Grove Ice
Arena. It's estimated that the indoor turf o B�. ion would ore than the amount of
residents that the City currently serves by con �' g w' _= a. eball, softb � ccer, lacrosse
and many other users who ot �: ' e may never o tage Grove Ice A=. The Ice
Arena is certainly a point of pri = �: community reading it's offerings to more of the
community is certainly a positive � t =:: .: to consi
CONCLUSION
This work plan �€
Grove. Altho= �_�_ ��
and should be a
be completed by t
SchQO���i�t_and
a��-���_ � .,s and lon
me of = oals appe :
ed ann :: by all pa
of . a e Grove
�o . �.� u _ , ns
:inue i -
�ditures.
<ist
� v' �� �°�� rov��athletic facilities in Cottage
�� oncre . plan is designed to be malleable
o assure continued progress. The work cannot
i= G. Partners will be the athletic associations,
rs. °7: ther, support from the Parks Commission and
e�nt :� n of the plan by properly budgeting and
!ves to improve the pride in Cottage Grove athletic
cilities and prepares the City for growth.