HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-02-22 PACKET 1030Cottage
/ Grove
� Pride and PrOSperity Meet
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
City Council and Economic Development Authority
Ryan R. Schroeder
February 11, 2014
Housing
Enclosed, please find the following housing market/demand exhibits:
1. February 3, 2014 Washington County HRA power point on housing demand
2. Excerpts from September 2013 Maxfield Research study on housing needs
3. May 29, 2013 Metropolitan Council 2012 Cottage Grove population estimate
4. November 19, 2013 letter to the Metropolitan Council from the City of Cottage Grove on
future housing growth in Cottage Grove
Please also find the following land use allocation exhibits:
1. Compilation of future housing counts by type/density
2. Future Land Use Maps (several exhibits)
Housing Demand
From the above four housing market/demand exhibits we can glean the following:
A. April 1, 2012 Cottage Grove population was at 35,187 persons in 11,896 households at
a ratio of 2.95 persons per household (this per household count is high relative to the
metro area generally; generally high counts exist within communities with younger
average ages generated by families with children under 18)
B. Current Met Council estimates for 2030 project a population for Cottage Grove of
53,000 in 20,000 households
C. Projected amended Met Council estimates for 2040 (ten years later) project a
population for Cottage Grove of 40,700 in 17,400 households
D. Maxfield projects a 2030 Cottage Grove submarket population (including St. Paul Park,
Newport, and Grey Cloud Township) of 59,000 in 21,225 households (roughly 9,000 of
those persons would reside outside of Cottage Grove).
1. Maxfield projects 1,764 new single family homes within the Cottage Grove market
between 2013 and 2020 (about 220 per year) and about 180/year between then and
2030.
2. Maxfield projects 950 high density for sale units to 2020 (about 135/year) and about
120/year between then and 2030
3. In total the Cottage Grove market is projected to produce about 355 for sale housing
units between 2013 and 2020 according to Maxfield and about 315/year for the ten
years following.
4. Additionally, Maxfield projects almost 1100 non-senior rental units within this market
between now and 2030 with about half of those by 2020 (about 60/year).
5. The market demand for senior housing (both owner and rental which is contained
within above unit counts), according to Maxfield is 821 additional units between 2013
and 2030 (perhaps representing an average of 50/year).
6. Of the for sale single family housing prior to 2020, 176 units are from the "modest"
market (under $350,000) with another 1,323 in the move up market with the final 265
units considered executive housing (over $500,000)
7. For attached "for sale" housing 570 units would be considered modest with 380
:
�
within the move-up category
Within the rental category Maxfield categorizes 170 as subsidized, 105 as afFordable
and 225 as market rate
Within the senior market to 2020 347 would be for active adults (11 units subsidized
and 103 being classified as affordable) with another 256 receiving services
(congregate care, assisted living, or memory care)
The Maxfield study talks about housing demand and does not consider lot availability.
Because of the interaction of the two we believe the development pace suggested by Maxfield
is likely three years premature. In other words it seems we would not be likely to hit the pace
suggested by Maxfield until 2016 perhaps.
Meanwhile the Met Council preliminary 2030 estimates appear conservative. We believe
these estimates, which generally perceive the suburban east metro as realizing a reduced
pace of housing growth, is based upon the belief that core city development will absorb a
significant share of housing demand.
In sum, Maxfield projects about 400 units/year of housing demand (estimated from above) with
10% to 15% of the total as market or affordable rental or senior (owner or rental).
Land Use Allocations
The East Ravine plan includes 4,000 acres for a total of 6,554 housing units. The breakout of
those housing units is 2,994 for single family, 1,602 for attached housing (townhouses) and
1,958 for multi-family (apartment/senior housing). Additionally, the West Draw has an
estimated capacity for 936 additional single family housing units and 66 senior housing units.
The Southwest development area has an estimated capacity for 476 single-family and 31
townhouse units. The Langdon area is a transition area that has been identified for mixed land
uses. Based on an illustration in the Red Rock Corridor Commuter Rail — Langdon Village
(January 2012), a total of 617 residential units (townhouses and apartment units) were
estimated. The residential acreage designated in the approved Future Vision 2030
Comprehensive Plan provides enough low density, medium density and high density acreages
to allow the construction of the following residential housing types:
Single Family: 4,406 units
Attached Housing: 2,083 units
Multi-Family: 2,241 units
Total: 8,730 units
The question if we have enough land available to provide development of single-family, one
level townhouses, apartments or condominium walk up housing, and senior housing has been
asked. Based on the undeveloped parcels available residential land uses shown on the 2030
Future Land Use map, approximately 1,771 acres is designated for detached single-family
development, 413 acres for medium density residential and 97 acres for high density
residential for an equivalent total of 8,730 residential units. The overall density based on these
estimates is 3.3 units per acre. The table below is a summary of the residential acreages
proposed in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan:
ESTIMATED ACRES ESTIMATED UNITS DENSITY PER ACRE
Low Density Residential 1,771 4,406 2.5
Medium Density Residential 413 2,083 5.0
High Density Residential 97 2,241 23.0
If an average of 225 new houses were constructed annually for the next 20 years, the City
would have enough low density residential land to construct the estimated 4,406 dwellings.
Based on the acreages designed in the Future Land Use map for medium density and high
density land uses and assuming an average of 100 townhouses and 110 multiple-family units
are constructed annually, this would also provide for 20 years of land capacity.
Excerpts from the approved East Ravine Master Plan, March 2006 showing the designated
land uses for the East Ravine and the residential unit breakdown is attached as Exhibits A
through D.
A copy of the Future Land Use 2030 map for the entire city is attached as Exhibit E. Four
future growth area are depicted on Exhibit E. These growth areas are: East Ravine, West
Draw, Southwest and Langdon. Illustrations 1 through 4 show the land use designations for
the four growth areas in the community. Illustration 5 and 6 show parcels of land that are
available for residential development within the West Draw and Southwest growth areas. Also
attached is Table 1 summarizing the estimated number of dwelling structures within each
growth area.
Excerpts from the Red Rock Corridor Study prepared by Hay Dobbs, January 2012 are also
included in this packet. This Study identified the Landon area as a candidate site for transit
oriented uses that are consistent with the Langdon Transitional Area described in the Future
Vision 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The Langdon neighborhood is designated as a mixed use
in the Comprehensive Plan which proposes commercial services and a mix of inedium and
high density residential units. Excerpts from the Hay Dobbs study showing the potential
station development area are enclosed.
Historically, the number of dwelling units constructed per year has generally not exceeded the
projections described in the approved Comprehensive Plan. If the average numbers of new
residential units are not constructed as assumed above, the number of years to "build-out" the
available residential lands will increase. The number of residential units yearly constructed for
the last 23 years is shown below.
NUIVIBER C�� �}1N��.1.�N1� Uhf1TS C�N5TRUCTE[�
C{)TTAG E G RC��IE, M IV
450
400
:350
3i�
250
2�
15�1
100
��
t]
T'
11
���
��
��
��
YEAR
Summation
We seem well positioned to address single family housing demand over the next number of
years with available land within the West Draw, the Southwest Area and the Upper Ravine
District. Creation of inedium and high density housing product can also be accomplished with
existing land use designations within two areas of the East Ravine. Those areas are at the
intersection of 70 and Keats and also between the Shoppes at CottageView and 90 Street.
The 70 area has some landowner interest in development opportunities and most of
the required infrastructure is in place. The land south of 90 is not currently on the market and
significant infrastructure improvements will need to occur to facilitate further development
within that district.
v� rs m ct �n +o t� oo rn o� r.i m�# us �o t� ao � v� nr cn'c# �n c� � co �rn o� r�a m
�u�irnrnrnrnrnrnrn o ° 000�o
r� e-i e� � a-i s-i s-i ri r-t i--7 x-i ri e-i r-d��.��.a--d:a-i:�� c-i�x� �rl tV �N N tV �N N C+� N N N N N C`J �N
� ���
: Comprehensive Housing
Needs Assessment For
___ __
ngton County, Minnesota
Washington County Housing and Redevelopment
Authority (WCH RA)
Woodbury, Minnesota
September 2013
1d
search Inc.
1221 Nicollet Avenue S.
Suite 218
Minneapolis, MN 55403
612.338.0012
DEMAND SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Cottage Grove - Summary of Demographic and Housing Condition Findings
Key demographic and housing market findings for the Cottage Grove submarket from the
housing study are highlighted below. For a comparison, figures for Washington County are
shown as well.
Demographic and Housing Characteristics Summary
Cottage Grove Washington County
z ;� ���'����_. ,�: ��,_����'�.-�` x s ��� ���Demographics ��;"' �������s,��,"�.�._��� � .,.:.��;��-�.,. ��z�a�
a. �:,.�F..� s,��.Ee-w'..�� `.,�' � ,
Population (2010 & 2020) 43,592 / 51,250 238,136 / 282,575
Households (2010 & 2020) 15,157 / 18,100 87,855 / 105,920
Household Growth (2010 & 2020) 2,943 18,065
Median Household Income (2012) $66,288 $76,800
Median Net Worth (2012) $170,979 $216,586
Homeownership Rate (2010) 86.0% 82.8%
�a� � ������^������.��� ���� ��� ����,Housmg C�iaracter�st�cs����r`��� ;��:� ����r����e�����"�'���� wr�
�,��r�
Occupied Housing Units (2010) 15,157 / 96% 87,859 / 95%
Vacant Housing Units (2010) 611 / 4% 4,515 / 5%
Number of single-family units permitted (2005-2011) 929 8,164
Number of multifamily units permitted (2005-2011) 217 1,339
Median age of housing stock (2011) 1980 1986
Housing stock built before 1950 1,091 / 7% 7,537 / 14%
Housing stock built between 1950 and 1990 8,823 / 58% 6,519 / 12%
Housing stock built after 1990 5,248 / 35% 41,316 / 75%
Median home value of owner-occupied units (2011) $216,178 $257,200
Median contract rent for renter-occupied units (2011) $834 $922
� � ��.,.���.��z.sz���� ���?��,�Employmgr�t s��_-- ��� ��.. � � "a�` � z�
�tx�u�.�z �.. ztk���., .���''
Number of Employees 9,368 73,684
AverageAnnual Wage $38,584 $39,832
N '��.�.��^.'�i_� ���..�.�..��. � ...g£.��....�.�. `'-�.�'�<'�.::?�.�`�..'YS�'rr �i�.��
:{ ����:�,. ��; For Sale_Hqusm �' �,�� ,�;E„N�. '��' �
Median resale price of existing single-family homes (2012) $175,000 $224,900
Median resale price of existing multifamily homes (2012) $104,250 $126,000
Median list price of actively marketing sf homes (1un. 2013) $198,000 $378,498
Median list price of actively marketing mf homes (Jun. 2013) $129,900 $168,530
$ �' ' , y;'s'�e's a �-: � z�.?�..^fs:r�. , � � ... , a��:+'�:3z' t �, r� '7�'a ,�,G �._ �� ,+a� ,�;;�Y'.e ro ���:
��."'���������$�.�� �..a���.�.��..���.G�nera�QccupailcY.FRentall{ousmg.����',1�.�;.���.��...., ,:��fi�.��!�°:,�,� s. �z....
Distribution of rental units by type
Market rate 589 / 63.1% 5,232 / 71.5%
Affordable/Subsidized 344 / 36.9% 2,082 / 28.5%
Average rent for market rate unit
1BR $745 $868
2BR $867 $1,071
3BR $1,151 $1,482
�*'.. .• - v� t x ;;.�����',',�.� ; ��„„ : ,.� y ... �, �3r} e �fi r �is'�t 3 ,� k�
.,s.,..� ;���.-�����,����s���,�, �.,��.��,�Seni,or,Housing��� ,' ��: ���'���?���'��.��s�:��^'u"�»..;
Distribution of senior housing by type
Affordable/Subsidized Active Adult 72 / 19.8% 1,128 / 34.6%
Market Rate Active Adult 82 / 22.5% 546 / 16.7%
Congregate 86 / 23.6% 626 / 19.2%
Assisted Living 62 / 17.0% 638 / 19.5%
Memory Care 62 / 17.0% 326 / 10.0%
MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. 326
DEMAND SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Cottage Grove Recommendations
Cottage Grove's close proximity to jobs in Woodbury, combined with access to the remainder
of the Twin Cities, will make Cottage Grove an attractive place to live. We project the Cottage
Grove submarket will add about 2,800 households between 2013 and 2020. �� ���
Cottage Grove Projected General Occupancy Demand, 2013 — 2020
G�neral
Ocpupancy
3,215
_ _
Eor-Sale Rental
2,714 501
I
SF tvl�ultifamily 9NR Aifordable Subsii
��:1,764 "� �'950 � 225 " ' 1 Q 5 �� 17
�!- �
Cottage Grove Projected Senior Demand, 2020
Note: Because households are mobile and are willing to seek out various housing products in adjacent communi-
ties, these demand figures may experience fluctuations.
MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. 327
DEMAND SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
For-Sale Housin�: Between 2013 and 2020, we project demand for roughly 1,765 single-family
homes, or about 65% of the general occupancy housing demand. Cottage Grove has a vacant
lot supply of only 52 lots and 133 future lots resulting in a future lot shortage. Additional lots
will need to be platted in order to accommodate demand.
Rental Housin�: There is demand for 501 rental units in Cottage Grove. Because of Cottage
Grove's close proximity to higher paying jobs, we find that a significant portion of rental de-
mand will be for market rate units (225 units by 2020). In addition, a rental develop has not
been built since Hinton Heights in 1993. Cottage Grove renters would desire newer contempo-
rary finishes and amenities.
Separate market studies have been completed for the redevelopment of the southwest area of
I-494 and Highway 61 in the City of Newport. Any housing as part of this development would
be in addition to the projections identified in this section.
Senior Housing: Norris Square was recently built in 2010 and has 86 congregate, 21 assisted
living, and 18 memory care units. We find that Cottage Grove could also support additional
senior units in the next few years. The greatest demand is for active adult rental units (up to
150) and assisted living units (up to 218 units.
� ��l
�
MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. 328
�u Metropolitan Council
u
May 29, 2013
Myron Bailey, Mayor
City Of Cottage Grove
12800 Ravine Pkwy
Cottage Grove, MN 55016
Dear Mayor Bailey:
Each year, the Metropolitan Council prepares population and household estimates as of April l of the previous
year. Local governments are invited to review and comment on the preliminary estimates. The Council will
certify final estimates by July 15 for State government use in allocating local government aid and street aid.
The Metropolitan Council estimates that the City Of Cottage Grove had 35,187 people and 11,896
households as of April 1, 2012. Household size averaged 2.95 persons per household.
With this letter, the Council is reporting the data inputs used to develop the preliminary estimates for your
community. The Council estimates current population and households through changes in the housing stock,
occupancy rates and persons per household. Input data sources include housing stock, manufactured home parks,
and group quarters data maintained by Metropolitan Council Research, as well as U.S. Census Bureau's American
Community Survey data. For more information on the Council's population estimates model, please visit the
Council's website at http://stats.metc.state.mn.us/stats/aboutestimates.aspx or contact Todd Graham at 651-602-
1322.
_�
Council staff welcomes discussion of tha 2012 preliminary estimates. Under Minnesota Statutes 473.24, the
Metropolitan Council must receive your comments, questions or specific objections, in writing, by June 24.
Please send any written comments or questions to Todd Graham, Metropolitan Council Research, 390 North
Robert Street, Saint Paul, MN 55101; or by e-mail to todd.graham@metc.state.mn.us
Sincerely,
l�
� �. j �� ��
� ��_ �,--.-�..
Todd Graham
Principal Demographer
www. metro council. org
390 Robert Street North • St. Paul, MN 55101-1805 •(651) 602-1000 . Fazc (651) 602-1550 • TT'I' (651) 291-0904
An Equal Opportunity Employer
2012 Annual Population Estimates
Cottaqe Grove citv, Washinpton Countv, Minnesofa
Households:
Housing Total
Occupancy Rate
11,896 Population in Households:
12,240 Population in Group Quarters:
97.19% Total Population:
35,103
84
Average Household Size: 2.951
35,187
Metropolitan Council's Annual Estimates account for housing stock changes since April 1, 2010. These include housing units permitted and other
changes. Other changes are due to demolitions, building conversions (units added or lost), city boundary changes (units annexed in or out), and other
changes reported by city and township staff. The Council assumes that 85% of multifamily and 95% of single-family units permitted in 2011 were
completed and occupiable by April 1, 2012; the remainder are occupiable in the future.
Manufactured homes are counted each year from Metropolitan Council surveys of manufactured home park operators ancJ local governments. Other
housing (boats, RVs, etc. used as housing) is an estimate from the most recent Census ACS estimates.
Housin� Stock
April 1, 2010
Single-family-detached:
Townhomes:
Duplex, 3-, 4-plex units:
Multifamily units:
Manufactured homes:
Other (boats, RVs, etc. as shelter):
9,839
1,209
196
755
103
0
92
0
0
44
Otherchan�es
since 2010
-2
0
0
0
Housin� Stock
April 1. 2012
9,929
1,209
196
799
101
6
Housing Total: 12,102 12,240
�
Each housing type will have a specifically estimated occupancy rate and average household size. Starting with the 2011-12 cycle, the primary data
are the most recent American Community Survey estimates, calculated and adjusted as described in the Council's methodology, available online at .
http://stats.metc.state.mn.us/stats/a boutestimates.aspx
Definitions: A household is a group of people (or one person alone) occupying a housing unit.
The number of occupied housing units and the number of households are equivalent.
Population in Group Quarters (or institutional housing) is counted separately through an annual Metropolitan Council survey.
Housin� Stock
April 1, 2012
Single-family-detached:
Townhomes:
Duplex, 3-, 4-plex units:
Multifamily units:
Manufactured homes:
Other:
9,929
1,209
196
799
101
6
Housing Total:
12,240
Occupancv
Rate 2012
97.56%
97.56%
83.96%
94.76%
100.00%
Counted only if
occupied
Households:
Permitted and
built sinee 2010
Occupied with
Households
9,687
1,180
165
757
101
6
Persons Per
Household
2.968
2.968
4.739
2.484
1.856
1.000
11,896 In Households:
In Group Qtrs:
Total Population:
Population
in 2012
28,746
3,502 .
782
1,880
187
6
35,103
84
35,187
Metropolitan Council 5/28/2013
�ott�.�e
�ro�r� � .
�'�er� Ptide a� �r°�p�ri�y Mee�
Novem�er 19, 20'f 3
Ms. Lisa Barajas
Manag�r of �.ocal Planning Assisfianc�
Metropofitan Council
390 Roberfi Streefi Nor�h
St. Paul, N!N 55'f0�
R�: Metropolifian Counci]'s Pr�liminary 20�� Farecasfis
Dear Ms. Barajas;
The.Cifiy of Cottage Grove undersfiands fhat fihe Mefiropolitart Cauncil has released
preliminary 2040 population, household and employment for�casts and is m the process
of reaching out ta cifiies befar� updating regianal plans ar�d fiinafizing growth forecasts in
�he seven-county metrapalitan area. Th� City of Cottag� Gro�e also understands that fhe
forecasts are for the year 2040 and forecasts for 2020 and 2430 will also be revised and
incorporated infio fihe adoptian afi the Thrive MSP 204Q.
Metropolitan Councils preliminary 2fl�0 forecast significantly reduced Cottage Grove's
number o�F households by 13 percent, populatifln by 23.� percent and employment by 20
percent. Thes� reducfiians are comp�red befow:
Co#tage Grove ���fl Regional Thrive MSP 20�4Q (preIiminaryj .
peve[opment �ramework
Nouseholds 20,000 17,400
Population 53,000 . 40,700
�mplayment 91,500 9,200
The C[fiy of Cof#age Grove undersfands that fhe collapse of the housing markefs
beginning in 2006 adversely im�acted growth in develaping cammunities. Becaus� of
this ec�nomic downturn, CQttage Grave's annual average number of new residentiaC
construction building permits �ell fr�m an average of 28'f permits forthe period 998�-2007
to an annual average of 63 p�rmits befween 2008 and November 20'i 3. !n preparin� the
City's Fufiure VisiQn 2Q30 Comprehensive Plan, the City us�d a gensral assumption of
25U hauseholds per year for planning purposes. .
The East Ravine N(aster P[an (2005} encompasses approximately 4,000 acres of land
loca#ed alang Woadbury`s sautheastern boundary and along Keats Avenue {CSAH 19).
This IVlaster P[an originally planned fhe development of approximafeEy 6,v54 residential
tanits over a twenty year period. Since ifs adopfian, development within the East Ravine
has been slow, but variaus utility extensions and transportafiiort improvements were
CI�F'l 0� COTTAGE GROVE • i2800 Ravine Parkway • Cottage Grove, Minnesata 55016
www.cottage-grove,org • &51-458-2800 • �ax 65f-458-2897 • �quai Qpportu�ity Employer ,
Mefropolitan Council
2040 Popula�ion Forecast
November 19, 2013
Page 2 of 3
compiefed. These improvem�nfs were designed wifih fh� capacities nec�ssary to
accommodate fu#ure grawth as dicta#ed in fihe Future Visian 2030 Comprehensive Plan.
Woadbury's Phas� 2 growth is in proximity fa Cattage Grove`s Upper Ravine wifhin fihe
East Ravine. Woodbury's Phase 2 provides enough land for residential uses fio
accommodate an average annual growth rate of approximately 600 uni#s per year over a�
ten-year period. The residential devefopmer�t acfiiuifies and fhe many additional
employment resources in UVoodbury's Phase 2 has renewed development interesfs in
Cotfage Grove's East Ravine and deveEopabfe land alang Coftage Grove's narthern tier
that adjains Woodbury's Phase 2.
The City is slowly regaining growfh and is expecting to achieve sustainabl� growth fhafi is
similar to levels befare the economic downfiurn. New housing canstrucfion acfiivifiy has
recenfly showed signs ofi recavery. In 20�3, six residenfial d�ve)opment praposals wit�
4'i 0 lots have been pr�sented fo fhe City: Fc�r comparison, the City only reviewed 98
residenfial lots for a�ive year period befwe�n 2408 and 2a12.
Regard[ess of whaf the o�ficiat forecasfis are for Cotfage Grove, fhe City wilf canfiinue to
ac#ively pursue a cans�rvative grovuth rate with the ability to react fo addifional growth if
praj�cted forecasts are exceeded. The Cifiy will also continue to pursue economic
development oppor�unities that will sfimulate empfoymertt and development proposals
fhat will pravide mar� housing supply.
The Metropolitan Council's preliminary forecasts appear to be based c�n currenfi markets,
economic growth, demographic #rends and real estate behaviors. �"o ensure the re�ion's
financia(, social and environmental stastainability, the forecasfs must carr�spand to local
planning and development expectations. AS fih� economy cantinues to recover,
development within Cottage Grave is expected to meefi ar even exceed pre-2Q06 levels.
The Gity will expect fhaf fhe Me#ropo(ifan Cauncil continues fio �nsure infrastrucfiure
investment that bes� supp�r�s th� total capacity of households, popu[ation and�
�mployment from the City's Future Vision 2�3Q Comprehensive Plan. To accomplish this,
Cotfage +Grove's forecasted grawfih for pianning purpases shau[d be based on an annual
grawth af approximate(y 2v0 new homes annualfy instead of the preliminary forecas# of
18S new homes p�r year and a 2.9 — 3.1 p�rsons per househofd insteacf of 2.3 persons
per household proposed in fihe preliminary forecast. The Cify af Cottage Grave continues
fio atfiract three and four bedroom hames fhat cater fio young families. The annual number
of new r�s�dential permits will continue fio increase and the number of p�ople per
household wilf be wifhin a few percentage points of the numb�r of �eople per household
we have experienced fbr th� past twenty years. .
The City will continue fo supparfi land-use patterns that effi�iently cannecf housing, jobs,
refiail centers and ensure an adequafe supply of dev�lapabfe land for future growfh. The
Cify will.wor�C collaborative[y with the Metropolitan Council in guiding the ragion's growth
Me�Popofitan Council
2040 t�opulation �'orecasfi
November 19, 2013
Page 3 of 3
ar�d ma�cing the most cost-efFective use o�F new and existing roads, sewers and other
cnstly [nfrastrucfi�re.
Vl/e loak farward to con#inuing diafogue wifih #he M�tropolitan Caunci( as #he Thrive MSP
209�0 branded plan evg�lves. �-,
City Adm in isfra�or
City of Gottage Grove
EXHIBIT A
East Ravine
Clty of Cottage Grove
Noiflhborhood 1
...a_ .I_ - -
� 1..� 1 1 i _�— _ ��.4 �� � � � �r '�1�•`
r ��. � 1 � i � � t� � I I � t� % ��
` �� 1 is ' _ :�.,- � 'i � -';-� � ,� 1 ' ��,,, (! �� �
l� t '',�`..� 5 ".�i�''vir�a,::�•..�.�;... �:::�'�._ � �
���� t ��
'� '�' � i � =i��il l
� �. __ .'=� ; , —
� ��� _� _I_� �.
,II �_;, _/( �ii�
Nelghborhood 1 North
Land Use Legend
.' Rura�Residenilal(lese�fian�r.vui�AneJ
� Low Densiry Rosidenlial (t-s uars i Aive�
N��IW -�65LOh
-BSltls -1��InHanu
.� Idedtum DensRy Reafdentlal (a-11 �Xws f A:m)
- rev,.vix rtvn.rma
� Ffiqh Densiry Resldantlal (dl orus/Acre)
- c�amnu�arµam�ms
� Clvlc 1 (nstimlienal
� CommerCfal
� IAzed Use
� Park ! Open Sporn __ � - -' - I
� �J_, � .
�� Parkway j. . ...;'' ��. ..�
� 904151flE �,�
� Wate�body � j� `;'""��
�'' � ,.
' :� . 1
�I�� �;�.
Nelghbori�ood 9 Soutif � , ; � 1 I ��
. . _ _ . �. ;f� �,.'.+�Ln
Noig hborhood 2
/01d
., ���t{u P i�NP�� coun� r+iovo an�
V �� y, ,��� � RC,Ulop�l P,i4.�.
k 7 � �
`''�t• _ .�' .
�J/�., l
�
Nelghborhood 2
A OP.T71
� �
O' BW k'N' 320]'
�.� Gly Of
Cottage Grove
nn�,e�+a
� i�,�mr,mti.,.rt,cn.���o.�.
Land Use Plan ��,�,ezoos u°����
���,.�� cnu:, v.,.�...
Il�wvrl Rfin.. C��rp.ry
mir.���
nt:v.�ac.,�� ta.
EXHIBIT B
East Ravine
Clty of Coftage Grove
Nelghbortrood 1 North
not�ru
G� illi' d00' Q:0
rt, . �
;��• �' 1 Sln9ia Family • 100' � Lols
J
;� Sins�la Family • 66' Lots
1 �
', I Singie Famity < g5' Lets
l�
� Tvin Humes
►�1
� Rc�shouselTownhousu
� Ccnd•sminium 1 AFarlmonl
� CommerCial
� CWIL f InSNIUIiRnal
. � Censervaliun Ensement
� Storm�xater Trcatmont I Wata�hody
�
� Park f Open Sraw
9�
���� Parknay ! Grernway
�,�
� J Residentlal Sub�Collecter Slmct
i
C.�LA of
�J Cottage Grove
��o
Neigh6aFOOd t NwJr
�ma uee �enma
� ..,,�..�. ,.. „«
J . ,._ ,......
� ..._ ......._ ...
� !..�..'....
. r..���.
1y . .� M:.
� "tu.r r
' �, u ,
tu
,, u
�
M1'cghhorMwi7
-�
,•,�a
`�� C�oge Grow
_ k�
� m,������.��K 2�,r�.��i��,.
Neighborhood 1 North Master Plan June2005 ;��;-��,�:,,,�..F..
11.+..10.fiA:� C�n�rynf
uu��,�
u.�� i,i.
Legend: Neighborhood 1 North
EXHIBIT C
East Ravine
Clty of Cottage Grove
Nelghborhoodi � Nalghborhood2
Legend: Neighborhood 1 South $ f ` �
t�:; 1 � o
i -;"• ; aomsuoet � � r O
. . : LG� y Singlz iamily- 1GU' Lols '� ��S . i pO
� ., f '� v :
� ` � .:_:,'`':
Singla Famity • 85' Lcts �� "�°
I �a� ,F��:.';k
� 4 .
Singla Fnmlly • < 85' Lets , �E�?j�:`��: �
�' � � .. 7�':.
u� �-�`,j`,... Cs:
� � r '`fn,.� i.
�`�'� Re+.fiouselTuwnhouse _ � "`� :'•''1,=;,•.���'•
I , �� ,� J � ``#,t
� `+ � . i�S!'?�:: < �,...
'�'�,, .;+. i���=�;'
Condeminlures 1.5parlments '; � �I
'���
� CivlallnsNlutional w . �
,�:l
� � ��
� t
� ��f
^�— Cemmcrciat __u l� � - �
(( _? f' , i� ��, )\�i �
,
C�. �: !,� __ r�:..
� Idired Use \ / ' � � .'°.'.' .:;
� � � f.� ,` � � :� `: ` ,�'.'�-�' 4 .�1
�
I � w �7
90N&Uael�� iA'?�I . �'���Y�`►� Mkr;��yk^.
PaiklOpenSpaw p ���� .� •7 �
qp �
� �•�J L,�°� �9�p `J J 'J J J�� + y � �
� � � �`" � �oJy�,',�, �1
54;rmwaW_r Trealment Area � � � -
� -! � ` S���l 1��11 ��';�
, �:
�, ��� � . ..,,.,;::>,,:,,, _:��:.
�'; :;:: '�,� .rr;'n�
� . :�dF'E�:.:� v
'� � - y � n :� `�rv<lC.:'p�.FY; �
� l ,'.:. '�`
� � -.;;�;, ..,�.>:
i ; � ��:a_�;4s�12�c�"�h orh�
r _+„ �� � ' : . , 7 tr nt ��
Neighborhoad 1 Soc�ti� � � ;I - ' • "; ' S� :�°:_++
� :� t �� e,�r�
{Coitac�e View) ✓y����; .,,,. :��,� .�:J
r f .
_ .._ V ' �(/ .� 1 ' j .`(
_ J � �i� �� .. r � � r
e��,�� „ " : , ; ,�� � t , 1 }
._ _;, �� � � �c� ! r t�rft i�ri 5 � �:{� �•tit !F.�l
w � �: � ri� � y �
r�� .^�5�► ���,� ;�_ �,,i,,.`/�...
�F:::'v . ir;r:1
�
ti� �
�0 "
' 6�
2
3' o1:Tii
U JCO' BC9' 16=0'
� Iiceinll,m/:..2�arn�ipin<.
Neighborhood 1 South (Cottage View) ���
Jurte 2005 ` ""'
Master Plan '°°"°'°'`:`"°"°.
11�+.��.18.(:e>. C�n�.r�
IIJ[.o�p
1'mA C.e.� 1�l
� l.�Y �
� Cottage Grove
Mimesofa
EXHIBIT D
East Ravine
Ciry of Cottage Grove
i
�';
i..
i
:�
Legend: Neighborhaod 2
;�� Rural Resldenllal �Less tn3n i txin iR m) ',
� Lax Densiry Rosldential (rs onYS nc�ral .
- tf6 � 4tl� - rg!: �04
- 95tote _ /YnN�mci
� Idedium Density Resldentlal (6-f7 uuTSlArn)
- iawn.�..; tmrc,ss.�
� NlghOenslryResldanllal(��7un•u�acre� ,,
caam�nm,. rMiro,k�.
� CommercWl �.
� Ir�ix6d USE
� Paikl.OpenSFuce .
� Parkaay
� WaWrbody '
sor;ru
O /CU BN' 1N_'0'
F:iYd Ilukinyu,roRwplsCnvpM1ic.
e���
Neighborhood 2 Master Plan Jcu�e2005 �:;�.:-s.�„�:.,,.,,,,,.
�,._,.� e .;,.. �.,,�..,
,,,�<.,,,
.�:�...r�,,., ,�,
EXHIBIT E
' = � � ' " , �.��� ►
� �! i , ( � ' ;, �
`"_�� � �� � ` � .�� �� �i >.��
Cotta e G rove ' ' " a__� ��_�� �!� ► ° 'I � �ir ,�, �
9 —� -_ _ ,--� -- �
Future Land Use 2030 � ��=����,����� � '�� � ,��' ��,__; �
L 7ti a ,�, �
� j�i n h �. � 4 �
�'�-=-��'� .
( `� 1►, _ ' � �. +,. r- �� �' C
_ �_�' � � � � r �•
. �,. ,%; .
_ . ..__ _ -
.._ �.�,o ..—._ ' Y � .___.
—' � '
1 ` II _ + _—` _..J' � ' '
LEGEND
CG City Boundary
ROW_LINES
-- CG Major Roads
LAND_USE
Agricultural
_ i RUral ReSldentlal I�� II�!��, ' � t .� � „ �� �� ��,,J-���€�;","�(�c�li��'� _,_,�
- y I! ^�l,n 1'- - .r \ ! t1 1-'Ir-�— �. ���� I I�' i I �I r*�
� i �
_ v !� � � I �
Low Densit Residential �f � � � _-
S O�It�1W@St �� :�L,� �, �-,, ��� t :---� � II �; �� ,
Med Density Residential ��� I ���1,��'�,� � `,:;``�,� �; �, �,-�._, , 'ir � "` �' I
h, �r— r ' /
�
_
//
� A% ,
�.
� �, �"" �J / 1 •;. /
High Density Residential � �'�:����� 0� J��, -� = f - ,�`�� I � I
� � \�� ���-- 'i � ��� E � ,
6--, ,
Mixed Use �' �'� _ ���,,� � ,�
�`: � �,
Commercial - � ' ` `� =1— � `' `� l ��
;:. ��-�, � �I I � ; ;- .�.� ;; , East Ravine
Industrial � -'� �' �' �" ` '"'
1, ��� f � � � \ � �, ��
Transition Planning Area Y � ! I ��� �"�' �
Parks/Private Open Spac '_�__` '
� ` ; r — -- --
/� ... _
�o�f coU�se - Langdon
`:: Mississippi River " -;;� � �-
,
_
`�.
, -, `�. - -_.___
�.;, ,. \ - -
� w
�
� �
�`�`.•.`� ", �s . � --
.. �.
..........-:�...,. ...
.�.:-•..�
....: ,
..
:.
,.
,.
••::::. _ ,
.,
. .. . ,
.. . . ?;
:.
'�-
�`�
�.�•r:�" ��°:.'• __ --
•..:.. �
. • ... �: �
.. ... _. . :.:
:�� ,
.
. . .. .... _ . . .. ...•
•• � f ..
,.:�-'.:?.:
'.�►.
.
�
�
�
I'
. .....: �.:.'.. . .;
, .. .. .: .,� ...�:
. . . •
...... .. �.... .., .
� .,;•.
,.
, ..... ...... . .....
,;..
/,... .. .... •'::
lr •... ..,._.::.. .' .' • '•:.. ........ .. .;:::i{::.':.:..�.:.:;.:':,;r.':,�...:.�:�....::.:.:-.<'� I
.�.��'��,:.:.:�:.:.�.':.�•'�.':'.:�..:.�• �.':�:.': ;:���� '
•'; �• � M:Vv1G15_Oepa�men� ProJec�s1MG15_Deparlman� Grojac� _2014WM ProfecW-�Fl1NRE IAND USE _ 2030 CCdEOA.mxtl
�
�' 1
\,
��
�
1 I
�
� � � ;;�
f\�L """. �I� `� / �n ^� � ,I �� , � I � .�.
� I� ��
r-
�� � �i \ 5. ,— �.A I
� �:_.,�� f '�,�E '!,'JI�� � �.4 � �� �7 ;a � �'� -
, L
„ � �;; �'i, �,�, ; � � � __
'� ,�''�� " ` �" `'��' �; I �
� !I i__���, r � �!� ' �i ,�1,
West D raw * �-,� /r , ,� .� � ;� `� —..�
W . �',�� l� `:���_ 1�31��''.. ���, .. .
�
�"�
�, ,�i
��
�� .
;� 4 —
_�,
� "_ _
i����°�'�*? FUTURE LAND USE - EAST RAVINE
-�
Cottage Grove �'"�'�' ��, � a���' ��'�
_
c , ,— ii ��� � � � ��—.\ �i ,,�_
Future Land Use 2030 ;� w �;-
� � �,
LEGEND �` ^ �Y �
_ - - - , et .�� - -- =
� - .
<. �� �,:�_=
� CG City Boundary �" c��� �
y ;, � i � _ � � J
_. - ROW LINES -,,� �� , �- Q.- ��f ; ��'
- —.� - �� �' �' ,` `���
-- CG Major Roads ` �� � , � ���! `
-=� �- � �-
�1 --- , _ �
LAN D_US E _, - -_ ___-- l �
,�
� `,*� — � I� _ th � �
.
Agricultural � .. � �
�, �
�
i�' t►•.�� :,;�� , �
' ' Rural Residential ,�, � ��� �'` \--�, , f �; {� ��
'l� -- � ��;\r/ " !
� Low Density Residential _ _ ;���� ,, '= .� 't�� ���� ,
,_ � ^ Med Density Residential �i�(�f v � l �� ��� ,
� � �
�� � �. � �I ,
� High Density Residential ��� � �ti,�1���. ���� �'° � '�
, � �.
� Mixed Use '� �
�.�
; , �
- Commercial '� r "�- '
� _5��. I
- Industrial ' t =��,,� �a j� � `�
�'. � I � � —�^�1
- Transition Planning Area 1 � �, � °_�
� Parks/Private Open Space � - -
,_..
� Golf Course
I.::,...���J Mississippi River �-
�
` �y�A
.'�` w_
Community Development
2/12/2014
M:WIGIS_Department Projects\MGIS_Department Projects_2014\JM Projec[s\FUTURE LAND USE EAST RAVINE CC&EDA.mxd
=._r��,-
�
I JaN�
__,¢�_ -
;:; � ..
ILLUSTRATION 1 � `��-�
�r
.,
�
., � �
, �J.
_ ^ 7�<
� i
_` ' � - �
t , ,.�
� ��
�
`���, �
� I Y
� G� _
� � �� `� C
` L�
� / ��� ��o �a
O.� � / / � f l/ 1J
� , C ;J � � I n i _ � -
� i �� l �
r `�� �� �_
� ,��� n
- ,�-, --
� Oth �fi ee �:-
� _ = ,�� I� I � ;�
�� �J
�'� 'Y
` � . -� t�"��
�
> '
O '
L
�
�
�
_.� ,
i���2���"..�'�?� FUTURE LAND USE - WEST DRAW
�1_
Cottage Grove
Future Land Use 2030
LEGEND
� CG City Boundary
ROW LINES
LAND_USE
Agricultural
' ; Rural Residential
Low Density Residential
I Med Density Residential
- High Density Residential
� Mixed Use
- Commercial
- Industrial
- Transition Planning Area
- Parks/Private Open Space
- Golf Course
� Mississippi River
Community Development
v�zi2o�a
M:Vv1GIS_Department Projects\MGIS_Department Prqects_2014WM Prqects\FUTURE LAND USE WEST DRAW CC&EDA.rtucd
ILLUSTRATION 2
�-;��--.
�r
i������*? FUTURE LAND USE - SOUTHWEST
�_
_— -- ,,,., ,�,� -�-
-- , �- ��
Cottage Grove
Future Land Use 2030
LEGEND
� CG City Boundary
ROW LINES
LAND_USE
Agricultural
i�� Rural Residential
Low Density Residential
Med Density Residential
_ High Density Residential
� Mixed Use
- Commercial
- Industrial
- Transition Planning Area
- Parks/Private Open Space
- Golf Course
� Mississippi River
� . _ _ ..__.�_,��
� �-�� �
�
I Community Development
2/12/2014
M:Vv1G15_Department Projects\MGIS_Department Prqeds_2014WM Prqects\FUTURE LAND USE SOUTHWEST CC&EDA.mxd
,
-
_ �_�
,�,�
��
��i
.
N
�'',
�
�Ili
,:,=�
_
ILLUSTRATION 3 - ��
���.
Y�
�,
�',
, �;
: ,t
y,`�, 1
,, '
■ �.:. '�
;��.,
�=
I �
�-95, � __,
��.�. I � ,
�' ; ; a l
�
I ;
�!
I'
�;`
� �
�l -
-
n� �,
.
�
�,\\
:,
:�;
i���e�_ °�*? FUTURE LAND USE - LANGDON ILLUSTRATION 4�—�� �
�- Y
Cottage Grove
Future Land Use 2030
LEGEND
� CG City Boundary
ROW LINES
LAND_USE
Agricultural
I Rural Residential
Low Density Residential
__ _ ___ _ _
Med Density Residential
- High Density Residential
� Mixed Use
� Commercial
� 4ndustrial
C �ransition Planning Area
� Parks/Private Open Space
� Golf Course
� Mississippi River
Community Development
2/12/2014
M:VvIGIS_Department ProjectsWlGIS_Departmen[ Projects_2014\JM Projects\FIffURE LAND USE LANGDON CCBEDA.mzd
"'����� \
,
; • � I � ',L
':� � ,,,,,,,�p��� �
. ,,_--. -�►� ��
:• -
,
�
.�
ESITMATED RESIDENTIAL UNITS WITHIN THE MUSA
COTI'AGE GROVE, MN
WEST DRAW "
Concept Plan - Walden Woods 128 1.6 209
Posavad 141 2 282
Bailey 77 2 154
Concept Plan - Bothe 41 2.3 94
Young 5 1.8 9
Kemp 40 1.6 64
Multi-Ownership 61 1.5 92
Everwood 2nd - Final Plat 1 1 1
Everwood 3rd - Final Plat 4 2.2 9
Everwood 4th - Final Plat 5 1.9 10
Oak Cove - Final Plat 9 1.4 12
Concept Plan - Summerhill Senior 5 66
SUB-TOTAL 517 936 0 66
50UTHWEST
Swanland 160 2.7 432
Centra Homes and Habitat for � 31
Humanity
Zywiec 28 1.6 44
SUB-TOTAL : 189 476 31 0
225/yr=20 yrs. 1001yr=21 yrs. 1101yr=20 yrs.
G:\planning\Excel Folder\Vacant Res. Lot Inv\Estimated Lot Count for CC & EDA 2014-01-11.xlsx
Table 1 February 2014
GRAND TOTAL 2,627 4,406 2,083 2,241
• I_1�[e]�Z�7�\�ll��e�el�
OWNERSHIP PATTERNS & LAND USE
. �� ,q
I �
� �/
�, ��\
��y City Owned Property
�� 3M Property
w,:,'�Fe
ti.l.% .---„-.--r�
' �r�— . . . . _ .
�
�� � � , tll�i0� ' �" � -
� .�i��" . ` � ' � \ .. � - �
� �_ � ,+_` /.�,3� � /.
, ' .< `� _ � � - _�� �: } � ( /y ,' -
�� . �"' � _ �� `'`k
f+� t + 4 �� �� • y �}�,
M • �\� l. � {�!"�µ��,C� r �1r�`�/�
z �p"' � �� � � Ir'fud`�UIC;II�"� !'�+" ` ��� �G �
� � � � ��� �
i + • �' _�,,,� . l, . -� ,�i -.. r �, � �:� '���f
y rt 3 . ; .+! � l i
: � � . � ' z � _ � � ��' � ! •�
�►i �* , ; ' ..sa ��A �
�ly��:' �t'°. $�� ` �'v. �° 6c� — - ' �'�R x �.'� � -.'
�� ,s . �' S.*� k �� ' �`
: �•
� #�:� _ w,�,, ��,� , T'�' I� _� �
'� � � - � -
�;-� �`' °� �' ;ri,�1"ss��a,
0
+"' � •, a � �.. , ,`,,'t� i .. ��
�!{y4�A.f � s � 'Y � .� ��z �e1
. y'. . . r ` r ���� �
^ l , ` _ . � x r- , L �.�., I�� � r .,
Y � � r�
4"M � : •r, r . ,� '•t # � .�� : �,� F , -
i
���..
. ��.' .
REGULATORY & POLICY
�
The site is on publicly owned land that currently houses the Cot-
tage Grove Public Works facility. In the initial phase of implement-
ing commuter rail, the public works site could remain with minimal
impaa, but relocation of the facility may be required to implement
the long term sution area plan. The station area is bounded by
single family residential and public land uses. 3M corporation owns
a significant portion of the property east of the sution. The City of
Cottage Grove has been acquiring property in the area as it be-
comes available to prepare for redevelopment.
_� ; �� r �I � •
_ y �
x. _
.
�
�� y _ .
'• �� i..
C .,/.I,, ��.,��
,/f r.: v .
, • z
� .
v . _. - ,.
.
ti,a..a ` ' ��. � ��� :.,\ � ��
.. �, • t � r = �^- �
� ,.
, ti�<�i,�� 1 � � ., �� . � �;, • � , -
1 � ,
- ,.j 4 e�y� �' f. .,• , ��. L . ,yt•.. � . "�
� . . r � ^ -- �" � ' - - - -_ — -_
.'�a� . , I�I"" "" � R""�� �'�•t_�
F { �• .
i . i► . I �. - �_,. �'+. �.::. C `�7'�� �� #
..a � � '� - f ' r .
'4n q ;� r � ,. � r.. ' \� •� � r �� �! ., '
� r .� y . � r � )
- .. 3 ��" � " _'S� � t.._�_.�s.�
� ' 1►.. . _ ,..; `r 1,. � ,. � ,—:. ,
. �. + _ �� y � e ��' .
ti ' \..- ! � � . � S
� -M` a ', • .' ' ...��' J
Langdon Village Station Area (Cottage Grove)
Property Ownership Near Stauon Site - 1/4 Mile Radins Sho�vn in Red
Station Area Planning Final Report - January 2012
The City Comprehensive Plan identifies this area as the preferred
location for the Cottage Grove Red Rock Station.
RED
RQC� CG
The City is worldng to acquire properry near the proposed s[ation as it becomes
available.
-- --- - �e1�[e'1�Zi7�\�/l��e�el�l
ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN - NEARTERM
ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN - LONG TERM
� �
� Station Area Planning Final Report - January 2012 � �
LANGDON VILLAGE SHORT TERM STATION AREA CONCEPT PLAN (YEAR 2020)
LANGDON VILLAGE LONG TERM STATION AREA CONCEPT PLAN (YEAR 2040+)
��e�el . . . : .
STATION AREA PLANS & VISION, CONTINUED
LAND USE PLAN
� � �
\\ ���.,�
3 ; � �; ��
� \.
� '' �`''` y \," � �. �.
'\.. � ...., ' �\,
� �, � ......
\\\�.\ � ��\�\
\ �\ ,..... \......
""_"�"""'" ` C V'�v.��.��. . • ^ \
� .
. � ._ : 1
�. '
. _. . L ' . . . :.
� __�_
. �
� .
--�_�.. ___ ' � '__ .._ _.l 3 ' _ ._
. '. • y�
�� �\
' d :___"___ � e
^. . . ' .
'. � `:'. '._._.._� . `
I
� Land Use Key �
Residendal _ Retail/Commercial
Pub6Ulnstitutlonal
"`s- Moced UselResidential
— Mbced Use/Commercial
Industrial
_ T2nsit
�_ Natural Landsppe
_ _ _ _ _ ; Proposed Land Use
Proposed land uses that differ from existing uses are outlined in a dashed line and filled
with the corresponding key color.
V �
---���
7 �
TRAIL CONNECTIONSAND GREENSPACE
� . �- PUELIC OPEN SPACE AN� GREENSUPE
s' _
yw � • \ — _.
. � . �=—
. ' � +• -� r6j yco �- �
- � � f� � �vR� .
- x � �• .. � .
• �
R� P � �.�
.�� • .I �
eCi; �
•�
C � 6RIDE . , ,..'.•�� .
. ; ' N
o - : MMP �� '
. .0. .e....� �
`Zi��
, NEW STREET . • � '.
To �rc 9UBLICGREE WAY �-. � t H� ��♦
.� ��_��< _ ,��+� r 6i�.
a�
� P�RK ... �'£
m .
N �
�'�E
.. . ' 96TH STREET 5 .. .. • . •. � • „ • � n Z
. . . .. _ .. ..... � ..,. •' a
_ � z�� �_�� �'£ �
. ;�,: . . - - A
.... �. .. r. Ne sn ¢r c T - .:)
1
�E��YY9R^OIwWTab � .. . �� O :
. . . PIn1nE Hepb�l TM _ . a �
�E+�oeae�.�.mrti � � • o?:
-.. Aw,,,d en. w.> rti �
_'."' E,bao m� sue..k ,• s o ' j
. - •'2/
�.-.-": ". e.m�s v.nm.wti i..mav. : � � ;
__ Aow..ar.nmmv.i ;��r
- - �_ oaM �w •
o�+.nwwv�a • �Si
ti •,.
LANGDON VILLAGE TRAIL CONNECTIONS AND GREENSPACE
� ' . �
�. � Station Area Planning Final Report - January 2012 '
�e\ � [ e l � Z � 7 � \ � / I � �e� e l � 1
Langdon Village - Building Sale & Type Summary*
STATION AREA PLANS & VISION, CONTINUED ��dUseType Building# FootprintArea #Stories To��
Residential I S,D�O 3 I5.000 sf
RECOMMENDED BUILDING HEIGHTS &TYPE (YEAR 2040) z i�,000 3 si,000:r
3 I5,500 4 62,000 sf
4 I5.000 3 45,000 sf
5 B 3 24.000 sf
6 I5,50� 3 46,500 sf
7 18,OOD 3 54,000 sf
8 6,500 3 19,500 sf
9 8,000 3 24.000 sf
10 I5,500 3 46,500 sf
I I 21,500 2 43,000 sf
12 I3,500 2 27,000 sf
Commercial I3 27,000 I 27,�00 sf
14 5,500 I 5,500 sf
IS 5.500 I 5,500 sf
16 6,�00 I 6.000 sf
17 2,500 I 2,500 sf
IB 5,500 I 5.500 sf
19 6,000 I 6,000 sf
20 4,500 I 4,500 sf
Mixed Use 21 37,000 4 148,OD0 sf
22 45,00� 4 IBO,ODO sf
23 7,500 3 22,500 sf
24 31,SOD 4 126,000 sf
25 I8,000 4 72,D00 sf
26 17,000 4 68.000 sf
27 17,500 4 7D,000 sf
Civic/Institutional/Office 28 2,000 I 2,000 sf
29 I,500 I I,500 sf
30*'�' 1.200 I 1,200 sf
31 4,000 2 6,000 sf
*Pla ns a nd calculations are conceptual, based on full bui Id out projections for beyond the year of 2040, and may shift as a result of ongoing station
area planning and programming efforts. Residential SF counts 700%toward Housing Units; Commercial, Civic, Institutional, Office, and Industrial
SF counu 700%towards Job Growth; and Mixed Use SF counts 50"/o towards Housing Units and 50%towards Job Growth.
'��^� Station Area Planning Final Report - January 2012
Recommended Building Scale &
Use
of Housing Uniu @ 1200sf each (2BR)
b Growth Potential (@ 350sf per worker)
rk & Ride (commuxer demand)
.rking (new development demand)
anning Study Focus Area
457,500 sf
62.500 sf
666,SD0 sf
I I,500 sf
667 Housing Units
1,192 Jobs
BSO Cars
3,948 Cars
- 64.5 Acres
� � �