HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-10-15 PACKET 04.J. REQUEST OF CITY COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL AGENDA
MEETING ITEM # � �
DATE 10/15/14 >
.
PREPARED BY Finance Robin Roland
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT HEAD
***********�******************************:��***�
COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST
Consider Fire Relief Pension increase request
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Adopt resolution approving a change to the bylaws of the Cottage Grove Firefighter Relief
Association for the lump sum benefit amount increase to $3,700 per year of service.
BUDGET IMPLICATION
BUDGETED AMOUNT ACTUAL AMOUNT
ADVISORY COMMISSION ACTION
DATE REVIEWED APPROVED DENIED
❑ PLANNING ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ PUBLIC SAFETY ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ PUBLIC WORKS ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ PARKS AND RECREATION ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ HUMAN SERVICES/RIGHTS ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ECONOMIC DEV. AUTHORITY ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
� MEMO/LETTER: Roland
� RESOLUTION:
❑ ORDINANCE:
❑ ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION:
❑ �EGAL RECOMMENDATION:
� OTHER: Request from Fire Relief Assn.
ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS
r
l
i
0
,�
.-____._... '�'� � ��� � .� 1� ,/C✓ A63 f � '
y City Administrator Date
�********************��**************�***�******
H:\Council items\council-action template.docx
Cottage
� �rove
� Pride an84rosperity Meet
To: Mayor and City Council Members
Ryan Schroeder, City Administrator
From: Robin Roland, Finance Director
Date: October 10, 2014
Subject: Fire Relief Pension Increase Request
Introduction
On April 29, 2014, the Cottage Grove Fire Relief Association members approved an increase to
the yearly pension benefit level from $4,300 per year of service to $4,700 per year of service. '
The City currently guarantees a benefit level of $3,150 per year of service.
Discussion
Minnesota Statutes grant a Fire Relief Association the authority to increase their benefit level
without City approval if the plan is fully funded. The Cottage Grove Fire Relief Association has
chosen to pursue this option since at least 1997.
Cities who guarantee the same pension benefit amount as their Fire Relief Association face
exposure to significantly increased contributions funded by taxpayer dollars should the
Association's plan fall below the fully funded level. This situation played out in 2010, when, due
to significant investment losses incurred by Relief Associations at December 31, 2008, required
municipal contributions statewide increased by 650%.
Recommendations from the State Auditor's report include the following language:
• To ensur^e the long-te�°m health of a plan, Nelief association t�ustees and municzpal officials should
be cautious when considerzng benefit changes. Relzef association tr^ustees, members,
municipalities, and independent nonp�ofit fi�efzghting coNporation boa�^ds must unde�stand the
effects that benefit changes have on the contNibution �equirements and long-term health of theplan
befo�e app�oving new benefit levels. Implementing smalle�, but moNe f�equent, benefit changes
may provide mo�e consistency to municipalities that are Nequi�ed to make contr�ibutions, and make
benefit amounts moNe consistent over time.
Historically, the benefit levels of the Relief Association and the City's guaranteed level compare
as follows:
Funding % Funding %
at Relief at Relief
year Relief Assn City Assn le�l year Relief Assn City Assn level
1998 2, 200 1, 200 2006 3000 2600 126.63%
1999 2, 700 1, 200 131. 39% 2007 3600 2600 116.11 %
2000 3, 400 1, 200 90.13% 2008 3600 2600 96.20%
2001 2,700 1,200 96.34% 2009 3600 2600 108.04%
2002 2, 700 1, 200 79.15% 2010 3600 2600 115.23%
2003 2, 700 1, 200 92. 02% 2011 3600 2600 115.47%
2004 2, 700 1, 200 101.10% 2012 4000 2700 115. 86%
2005 2, 700 1, 200 114.46% 2013 4300 3150 124.68%
Each year the Relief Association is required to compute their "accrued pension liability" in relation
to the total of the association's assets (investments). The Relief Association target has been
that the assets support a benefit level (pension liability) at 110%.
In a review of assets, investment earnings, and benefits payouts since 1999, stafffound the fund
has experienced investment losses in 33% of the years. The Association has also paid out
benefits in excess of $100,000 in 73% of the years since 1999 as follows:
Year Investment Benefit
loss Payout
2000 $314,001 $127,275
2001 189,554 122,636
2002 227,674 286,746
2004 253,697
2005 268,137
2007 114,302
2008 354,150 198,570
2009 166,540
2011 20,563 127,848
2012 135,684
2013 108,150
It is notable tha4 there have been eight significan� corrections in the stock market
since 1970. The DOW (as one measure of stock market performance) has
experienced �n average correction of 30.75% over those eight instances.
Investment losses and benefit payouts are outside the control of the C.ity. Staff evaluates
projections of future exposure, using average (or likely) scenarios as well as `worst case'
scenarios to assess the impact on future funding requirements, using the 130% funding policy
as a perFormance standard since 2006. Prior to that date the City had not considered a change
in funding guarantee in over ten years.
The 130% level was chosen to minimize potential exposure to an increased required municipal
contribution brought on by the adverse effects of a significant market adjustment combined with
a significant payout in a single year.
Starting in 2015 the Relief Association is compelled under GASB Statement 68 (Accounting and
Financial Reporting for Pensions) to conduct an actuarial of their assets and benefit level
support. Failure to do so could result in a negative impact to the City Audit. Given that, it is
management's intent to work with, and contribute toward, the Fire Relief Board to assure timely
compliance with this requirement.
In 1997 the Relief Association contracted with their audit firm to complete a ten year plan that
projected estimated benefit levels with 8% and 10% investment return assumptions of their
portfolio. Management is in agreement with the Relief Board that a similar plan, albeit with more
modest investment return assumptions, should be considered as part of the work plan for 2015.
Action requested
Consistent with our policy of a guaranteed level of benefit supported by a funding level of 130%,
staff recommends that the City Council increase the City guaranteed benefit level from $3,150
per year of service to $3,700 per year of service for 2014 by adopting the attached resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 2014-xxu
APPROVING A CHANGE TO THE COTTAGE GROVE FIREFIGHTER RELIEF
ASSOCIATION BYLAWS
WHEREAS, the paid on call firefighters employed by the City of Cottage Grove
are members of the Cottage Grove Firefighter Relief Association; and
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Cottage Grove does not have control
over the financial and investing activities for the Cottage Grove Firefighter Relief
Association; and
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Cottage Grove has a responsibility to
the taxpayers of the City to effectively manage the City's financial obligations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, approves a change to
the bylaws of the Cottage Grove Firefighter Relief Association at a lump sum
benefit amount of $3,700 provided in appendix C of the bylaws.
Passed this 15th day of October, 2014.
Myron Bailey, Mayor
Attest:
Caron M. Stransky, City Clerk
�; � :.,�� : , �
Cottage Grove Fire Department Re.lief Association By- Law Change
2014 Years of Service Increase
On April 29 2014 the Cottage Grove Fire Department Relief Association voted at its second meeting to
increase its yearly service award from 4300.00 per year of service to 4700.00 per year of service for all
members in Good Standing that are currently enrolled and employed as a part time firefighter. This By—
Law change will replace the current By-law of 4300.00 per year of service for each member.
The motion passed by its members in attendance.
Randy Gerlach: President
Robert Bray: Secretary Recorder
Albert Beaslev: Treasueer