HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-01-13 PACKET 05.E.Cottage
J Grove
IV/, ell Pride and Prosperity Meet
TO: Cottage Grove Planning Commission
Advisory Committee on Historic Preservation
Cottage Grove Economic Development Authority
FROM: John M. Burbank AICP, Senior Planner
DATE: December 8, 2014
RE: Historic Places Conditional Uses — Code Compliant Site Improvements
Introduction
During the review of the last two properties to receive a Historic Places Conditional Use Permit
( HPCUP), the question of site improvement standards was discussed quite heavily. The root of the
discussion was that if these properties are functioning as commercial entities, should they be held
to commercial site development performance standards. The predominant standards identified
would include hard surfaced parking, concrete curb and gutters, stormwater ponding and
landscaping.
The Council had requested that the Advisory Committee on Historic Preservation (ACHP) continue
this discussion further and to formulate a recommended course of action on the topic. Additional
direction is being sought from the Planning Commission and the Economic Development Authority.
Discussion
As a base for discussion, two sets of questions were identified. Based on positive or negative
answers, the course of the policy discussion and formulation would take a different tract of review
and establishment.
General Discussion Questions
The following general questions need to be answered prior to any policy action being taken.
A. Should historic properties operating with a HPCUP be held to the same development
code standards as other commercial properties?
B. What purpose would be served by having historic properties developed to commercial
standards?
C. Should a certain percent of site improvement or use intensification be utilized as the
trigger for historic properties operating with a HPCUP be held to the same
development code standards as other commercial properties?
D. Should the establishment of some sort of "bonus" incentive program for HPCUP
properties be explored that would make code compliance a favorable action?
Historic Places Conditional Uses — Code Compliant Site Improvements
December 8, 2014
Page 2 of 2
Site Specific Questions
If a determination is made that HPCUP properties should be held to the same development code
standards as other commercial properties, then the following site specific questions need to be
answered prior to taking action on any established policy.
A. Does the site improvement or use intensification associated with the HPCUP request
meet the trigger criteria for code compliance?
B. Are commercial code compliant development standards appropriate for this historic
property?
C. Would commercial code compliant improvement detract from the historic nature of the
HPCUP property?
D. What is a just and equitable timeframe for HPCUP properties to complete required
improvements?
E. Should a property's HPCUP request be denied or limited in duration based on the
inability to meet code requirements.
Summary
Based on the answers to these questions, there are four courses of action.
1. Recommend no action on the topic.
2. Recommend the adoption of a policy relating to the topic.
3. Recommend an amendment to the HPCUP section of the ordinance to establish code
compliant improvement triggers.
4. Recommend that current HPCUP owners be notified of the amendment process in addition
to normal public hearing notification.
Recommendation
Review and discuss code compliant site improvements for properties with Historic Places
Conditional Use Permits and give a recommendation to the City Council on a policy addressing site
improvements and triggers for improvements.