The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2016-05-18 PACKET 11.A. Cottage J Grove ��er� Pride and Qro�P�rity Me�t C I t�/ C O U I'1 C I I REGULAR AGENDA Acfion Request Form 11 .A. Meeting Date 5/18/2016 Department Community Development Title of Request Fire Station #2 Architectural Professional Services - Award Project Staff Recommendation Award the professional architectural services for the design of the proposed Fire Station #2 project to Wold Architects and Engineers and authorize staff to negotiate a contract. ATTACH MENTS: Description Type Upload Date Council Memo Cover Memo 5/13/2016 RFP from Wold Exhibit 5/13/2016 Wold - Presentation to Selection Committee Exhibit 5/13/2016 Cottage � Grove �here Pride and PrOSPerity MeeY TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Charlene Stevens, City Administrator FROM: Jennifer Levitt, Community Development Director/City Engineer DATE: May 13, 2016 RE: Fire Station #2 —Architectural Professional Services —Award Project Background The existing Fire Station #2 building was constructed in 1972. In the early 1980's expansion occurred to the facility to meet the growth of the fire department. The renovations to the facility were completed in 1985, which then allowed for additional apparatus storage, improved kitchen facility, fitness room, and small day room. Due to its age, increased maintenance costs, functionality of the facility, and a new fire response model, the existing facility is not able to meet the growing needs and demands of the fire and EMS response systems. In March of 2011, staff began to assemble and evaluate the needs of the fire department. The staff-led facilities needs summary was completed in September 2011. The project is currently proposed to be constructed in 2017. Discussion The space needs study outlined elements to be included in the proposed 36,254 square foot building in more detail. Through the space needs study, it was determined that the estimated budget for the proposed facility would be $9.1 million compared to the $7 million outlined in the CIP. The Public Services Commission reviewed the space needs study and is supportive of the site selection of 8641 80th Street South. The City Council, at their meeting on March 16, 2016, accepted the Space Needs Study, ap- proved the proposed Fire Station #2 location at 8641 80th Street South, and approved the Request for Proposals for Architectural Services. On March 21, 2016, the RFP was transmitted to 16 firms with a deadline to submit proposals of noon on April 22. The City received 11 proposals. The selection committee reviewed those 11 proposals and selected three firms to interview. Interviews were conducted on May 13, 2016, with Wold, Five Bugles, and SEH. Following the interviews the selection committee discussed the proposals and selected Wold Architects and Engineers to provide professional architectural services for the design of the proposed Fire Station #2 project. The professional services are proposed at a fixed fee of 6 percent of the construction value of $5,850,000, less $8,000 for a credit from previous space needs study, equaling $343,000 for the new fire station design (schematic design, design development, construction documents, bidding, and Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Charlene Stevens Fire Station #2—Architectural Services RFP—Award Project May 13, 2016 Page 2 of 2 construction administration). The demolition contract for the existing fire station is valued at $100,000; the proposed fee for service would be 6 percent, equaling $6,000. Wold's submittal for the RFP and a copy of their presentation from their interview are attached. Recommendation Award the professional architectural services for the design of the proposed Fire Station #2 project to Wold Architects and Engineers and authorize staff to negotiate a contract. � _ _ I � '� I � � I I A � � � � / � ' ,� � ! � � � i� :M � ', � - i ' , � ' �' --:�_ � � � ; ��, _ _ a�, - -- .+', - � � � - a � , � � � � � : City of Cottage Grove � : Request ior Proposal � : Architectural Services for Cottage Grove Fire Station No. 2 � ; Apri I 22, 201 G � � � '� :� : Jol�n Mr,Na�7��ra//AIA, LEED AP 332 Minnesola Streel, Suite W2000//SL Paul, MN 55101 � P G51 227.7773 � F G51223 5646 � jmcnamaraC�v,roldae com � � _ _____ ___. --� '� � , � , ,� �'f .............._.._,.. .,_....,__....._...... ........_............._... ...... ...,......., ., _ � � � � � � � � ' V��V��; �� _;:�� u��pdi`:r a � � i_,Ovr:, Lr:'�ir;i r � °i Firm Qualifications i � : 2. Staff Qualifications �� : 3. Design and Consl�rurti�,�r� �� : 4 Cost Proposal �x 3 � ''j � 'j � �'� �� '� ,'� �� '� '� � � � ; April 22, 20`I6 �� r.�.��:� i r��Ti��, � Jennifer Levitt ,� • • � : City of Cottage Grove : 12600 Ravine Parkway � : Cottage Grove, Minnesota 56016 �� : Dear Jennifer: � Wold Architects and Engineers,and I personally are pleased to respond to the City of Cottage Grove's request for Proposals for Architectural Services for City of Cottage Grove Fire Station#2.As the architect for the Space Needs � Assessment and as the architect for the Public Safety/City Hall project for the City I have a passion for the City and � for the success of this project. � Wold Architects and Engineers has worked for over 45 years helping municipalities realize their facility goals. Our expertise in the planning and design of municipal facilities, including Fire Stations as well as other related public � safety facilities, makes us the best fit to partner with you on implementing the solutions we worked together on dur- ing the planning phase. Our recent relevant experience includes projects just like yours: � » City of Cottage Grove—Fire Stati�n Master Plan .� ` » City of Cottage Grove—Public Safety/City Hall » City of Richfield—City Hall/Police/Fire Statian � � » City of Faribault—Fire Station Renovation : » City of Minneapolis—Emergency Operations Training Facility � : » City of Farmington—New Fire Station No. 2 � : Having worked closely with City,we understand your goals for this project include: � : » Approximately 36,000 square feet of remotleled space to meet the space needs for the Fire Department : » 12 apparatus bays � � » Lobby meeting space/exam room and historical display for the department ` » Multi-use training rooms � » Administrative offices � » Living area including kitchen, sleeping rooms, restrooms, showers and laundry » Fitness room � » Hands on training area with training tower » Storage � : Our creative and expert team is prepared to assist you in implementing your project antl I know that Wold can and I � : wiil exceed all expectations for service and responsiveness.As you read through our proposal you will not only see , : the depth of our experience, but aiso our passion for helping our clients be successful.We are excited to submit the � following proposal and would welcome an opportunity to present to you our expertise, approach and commitment ta your success. � � Sincerely, � � !'ll�r�- ;� Minnesota Illinois : John McNamara//AIA, LEEDAP � Michiyan : Partner-in-Charge Colaratlo ; jmcnamara@woldae.com :� lowa � � � -� � '� 1. FIRM QUALIFICATIONS � � .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... � � Firm Profile .� � ��r;�� k �llold A��hit�cts ��0 �a�e��ra��rs ' ' �-�' 332 Minnesota Street , � �` � Suite W2000 � �j �� '� � Saint Paul, MN 55101 ';•,, t 651.227.7773 �'� a f 651.223.5646 �� www.woldae.com ' .,;�,,, � � �`�� a�Roe��ca��: 196$ ' �. -`� � Legal stat�rs: Corporation ;; ;; 1 � Ownershipo Privately Owned _ _ `� Main Cont�c�: John McNamara , , ' , � jmcnamara@woldae.com//651.227.7773 - - � � � � � ■ ■ i� ■ � - � _�._-r- r• - - - � - � VUoltl specializes in PUBLIC FACILITY STUDIES ■ r � � � � � � ' � » 20+Minnesota County Clients � - » 20+Municipalities � � � � � � � � ' » 10+State and Federal Agencies � ' � � � � �,,� � � '�� » 100+Space Programming Studies � » 15+Police Station Studias ��'�s� �� Since its incorporation in 1968, Wold Architects and Engineers has developed an expertise � Staff Counts in the planning, design, and engineering of gavernmenta�facilities in Minnesota.Wold demonstrates depth of experience in planning and design of facilities,and a strong � Registered Architects 32 commitment to client service resulting in substantial long-term relationships with our clients. Graduate Architects 99 � Registered Engineers g ; Our goal is to identify for our clients the best possible facility solutions designed to meet Gratluate Engineers 41 : °Perational and budgetary needs while enhancing the aesthetic environment for both users � and the community. Interior Designers 7 : � Technical Staff 2 : ��r�'�� ` ��`'�� ' Administrative Support 2q » Strategic Facility Planning » Mechanical and Electrical Engineering » Pre-Design Program and Verification » Cost Estimating and Management Total 2y s ; » Space Atlequacy Evaluation » Quality Review � » Site and Facility Analysis » Bidding and Contract Review � » Interior Design and Space Planning » Best Value Procurement ' » Schematic Design » Comprehensive Construction Administration � » Design Development » Project Close Out and Archiving » Contract Documents » Continuous Post-Occupancy Follow .� » Security Analysis Through » Color/Material Selection » Utility Tracking and Analysis :J » Sustainable Design � Cit}� of Cottage Grove /I Architectural Services fnr Cottage Grove Fire Statior� No 2 7 � �j. � . -� �,�- � � -- - �- - , � �� I�� ' �' , � Ir � _ + � �� ..'' - ,� i _ r, �; , � . � � l � _-- -- --_ --�� -- -- - -��-- _ —_ , Y -��. ' .�� .+ t� '� i�� City of Cottage Grove � � �, PUBLIC SAFETY/CITY HALL FACILITY, ___ _ ._. —�-'�'�� _ �% FIRE STATION N0. 2 MASTER PLAN �ri�� i , �` �� f3, -��•> i k _ '�n i � — I� / �� .. � � J ._-- �'*. � � �� ! ! I , i , " t�,4 r;,;n�.:.. _ .' ( � - � �, � ` � �� .� — _ , _- ---�� "� � , � � �� _ _ _ I � 9I _ � � s�l� �r F ^ _.) ,I ; � 1 r ,I I' f,I � i � ' . f � � � - , �' _ i �, _ _ � � ; �� , y'• , .�.�' .- � " "_ '' ��;�. , ; �1�' �i _ � _. , ��.� :� �:, �f � _ ��.' � �; ,�, � _- - ,�, "��---_ ,, � � � - - -��--� � �� I �� -- - _ --- .�i- - __ - .��.,;, ; •, � - - --'�� _�- '- - - � - - -� ' .. n _ . ��i f� �1 - — --------- �� Public Safety and City Hall � �� Size:68,000 SF li ;� � � Contract Amount:$13.5 million I � , �� - Type of Project:Architectural Services , i Completion:2012 � I � , � -� � �,� � Wold Architects and Engineers was hired by the City of Cottage I 1 'f IF Ir ;, �� ,� � Grove to revisit an earlier space needs assessment and then design t �� ,��, � �■,j�� a new Pubiic Safety/City Hall facility located on a site atljacent to the , �� IIIII��,� �� ' Washington County South Service Center in the southern portion of ��'�-� ='13�s� , � = "�� the City.Woltl master planned not only the Public Safety and City � � Hall, but also a future Community Center, Library,and Fire Station. � ��° � The first step in the design process was to develop guiding ' ` �;� _._` -_- � principles for the facility and to take the conceptual space study i ; , `� and reconfirm operational goals and future growth projections for ��- I j =� � ��-� � � { �_ � departments. From this confirmation of the space needs,a detailed :�_� 1 ; �,_��--+��,��-, i,� -� � � space program was developed and approved bythe City. � �.-. � � � � ' �� '�' � ;� - , Cuttage Grove Contact: Architect Contact: �� __ Tg � i � M Craig Woolery//Public Safety Wold Architects and Engineers ' �� - -�- ' � �= i Director 651.458.6015 John McNamara i � - �' 651.227J773 -. ---= - - — � � ,�, � ,'�' � 1. FIRM QUALIFICATIONS � • • .._.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... � '� �ir� ��e�r� �e-�� Mc�si�� Ic�r� � Size:30,000 SF d� Contract Amount: N/A - Type of Project:Architectural Services BOTH STREET SOUTH � Com Ietion:2016 : �---i - , - - '�� ——— � r � � � �., , � � , 0 _ . � � � ' .� . ` � � '` � �,�,. 1 � � '�� ir �� :� � � � � � ■ - - _ � ■■ �. � ■r � . � \.e.,.- •■■■ � � r �� ., , . � . ;. � �_ , _ _7 � , �� ,! .. � - . �� ■ �� `-�- � ii � _ . � t��.� . - �'��■ ;. � �_��r .,., • a � I . — "'� � � .,' ■■ - � � � �- -""`�,'.�_� �� c� n � � 1. FIRM QUALIFICATIONS _ . . ..........._...._............................._........................................................................................................................................ .__.... .__..._...._. ._.... � v� r� Puf�li� Saf�ty/(�it�r I-�c�lA/Fir� Stc��ic�� „� Richfield, Minnesota �� Size:105,000 SF � Contract Amount:$19 million Type of Project:Architectural Services ,� Completion:2011 � Wold was selected to work with the City of Richfield on a preliminary program and � schematic design for a new Fire Station, Police Station, and City Hall.The new � facility was constructed on the existing site, ; - _ ' with the existing Fire Station remaining � � � � ,� , � operational until completion. -'� '� � . ��°' - � ''� The Public Safety and City Hall Facilities , - and the atljacent residential neighborhood �- '� are situated along the busy Partland � � Avenue corridoc The design gave special _ consideration to segregation of both �� . . � - traffic and parking of staff, Police, Fire, -- � � and visitors to ensure safe and efficient � � vehicular egress.Another emphasis of � this project is the synthesis of municipal : � ; i I � ,� functions within the park district amenities � �.��- , which share the balance of the site. � ' � � � � - �� L— d,_ rJ ::i��r � � • 'r� -�� '� Richfield Cantact: - Steve Devieh//City Manager ��_z�- � 612.861.9700 �' � � y - Wayne Kewitsch//Fire Chief ,� 612243.4500 � i � - -�� _ � '� Architect Contact: ` Wold Architects and Engineers _ '� '' Michael Cax ` i � 651.227.7773 � !� � -,, � ., _ �``� �. .� _� .r., . . ,., �;,.. � - ,�� ,,, � � �x. � . ----- - - - -- � City oi Cott�ge Grnve !/Architecfural Services for Cottage Grove Fire Station No 2 11 � �.j � � �--�—" _ ►1� � City of Farmin�to� �, �IRE S�'ATIQN NQ. � �, � , � � �, �� ,�- - ��. _ �_� �- ��.: y�.- � _ _ . . � _ � �'� ' I �� et, (�� l� i I ��-_. � , � . t �� j `` I � - j , � i �1 - � � � 1 �� ,� I � � _ ��. "�, '', �� . . ,� - ■ , �, � �:, � `Iill�l '•'� ��I�f� �� ' , . ( x lu; � � � �� ,��;, �� . ___ � ',� �, _ � .�� .�. � � `\ �' �` - 7� W " �I�T�.. � . �, \��,�i� i� iV 7. � _ ��. � � � ��. � `� f: - . .�- ._ � �. ,f I1�, . . 4' `. .�.:. �" ' . _•�' �,q �� ,_ ' �-�i .. ;'�.�� ' i ��R�! �� - �''� � � i� � �� - .. __ ` �� . �� , ' - _ _ ,�� .,,, � � . , �, � � ' � -� -- � . �, � �ii � �' I s°` -- ;_ � � r 1� � - � _ � '�� - - - �� I f II`��,,�i �..�4 if'�,IJ1='� `,�I�I;. �,�.1�� _ � ' � _. .. .. ..... ...... .. _ . . . . ____ .... .... ...... ..... . ....... ... .... .__. _ � `� Fi�� Stc��'w�n N�. 2 ,� Farmington, Minnesota � Size:9,400 SF � Contract Amount:$2.1 million Type of Project:Architectural ,� Services � Completion:2006 i � ' � After helping the City of Farmington face F�g� 5��.�N��iti �' -. - the cha�lenge of a growing population � '� by planning and building a new North ' Municipal Campus that induded a Police , � � Station and Public Works Facility,Wold was �, r� '�^ � �� i�� asked to help the city meet its aitical need ' ~— ��" , � � • � for a new Fire Station.Wold was again hired l�� _ �� ' I_�� -�__ ��t �� i ,� ta assist the City with design of a new City Hall which was completed in 2008. � Wold tletermined the space needs for a ,� second Fire Station in Farmington,as well as the needs for the existing Fire Station. _ _ _ � . � � With input fram the fire fighters, City i �� ' i� � Council, and the Apple Valley, Lakeville, � ..I � -� "'-. -� � � and Farmington (ALF)Ambulance Services, ; ; - Wold was able to develop a highly �u� � �: successful antl functional desi n c�nce t �� ' � 9 A for the new City of Farmington Fire Station � � � I � No.2. ' � � ` �� I '� The sieek, planer aesthetic of the exterior �" �I � ' ` 1 " �� " design was accomplished economically , � _ � .� ci W � .�.� .�� I i� h� � ` � .. .:,;�_ ' ' ,— =�= `� by use of a combination of masonry and — — - - precast concrete panels. On the interior, 1 , � a building program was developed which ,_�� . � includes Living and Sleeping Quarters, _ i I 'ii Training/Conference Room, Radio , � I'� _ . - Equipment Room, Staff Offices and a Hose � � ��-�� • ,� � � ,, ■ , Tower. , � - L�r,. , � �� f� � ` ` 11■ �.F �� Farmington Contact: �•' `� Dave McKnight//City Administrator " 651.463.477� � � ��""' ,. °,` ,� °+� ��,�;it,��;�;�:��w J Architect Contact: y ��r�" ' �, ' _J� � � Wold Architects and Engineers �' ....�_ __�T John McNamara - M 651.227.7773 j_ _ 4"=� - �' "� City of Cottage Grove //Architectural Services fo� Cottage Grove Fire Station No.2 13 �� .. �` � �� ' Minneapolis Emergency � Operations Training Facility � � �� - . . � �� . � � .4� ��,�. r M1'!'�,: h� �� p'•� i�,) + * ` — �I a� — - —r� NI� i . ' ` s . � _ �I r �� _ �� -�� -� _ _ � � � - � --�� 1�1�� ' � �: , �� _�- - �� , � �� r , _ �� -��,,�- �- �- � , � _- �- � � � ,�_ - �� ., �� , �� - ' �� .,_ , � � , . � �; � I � '� 1. FIRM 6�UALIFICATIONS � � ..................................................................................................................._ .........................................._............................................ _ ............................................ � '� Minneapolis EOTF � Minneapolis, Minnesota `� SIZB:23,200 SF r . Contract Amount:$4.5 million � ''� _� � Type of Project:Architectural Services � � � Completion:2012 : ; � . . After the collapse of the I-35W bridge, ; � � '� the city's need for a motlern Emergency � Operations Center was heightened _ and funding was a►located.Wold was --_ ; � interviewed and hired by the City of ; � �----- ---__ ,� Minneapolis to pursue a facility for the city ; - -- >- � which integrated all of the city's real world , � �Y � i learnings from the actual EOC disaster �; ; ,� '� :. -��-� , - �� response to the 35W bridge coilapse. _ � '''�' = y' � - �-- -=,y-.. -_ - _ - -:_ _e�� Wold was charged with developing a master : _ �� plan for the Fire Department Training : � of ofpc stforthelFire Depa�rtment's Tra nti�g : I �� '� Division as well as multi-use Training � Classrooms that doubled as an Emergency ; ' � .� ��--=�T- �- y ', � Operations Center.Through the design \ � ' , � process and allocati�n of sufficient funding, : ` � � � - ., - � � a Strategic Information (Fusion) Center was : ��_ � �1 ,;, � added to the design to provide a source � i� � .i�� , ,�y �- � ', of"always on" information for the EOC. A 'a° �� '=a V � � ,� future vehicle storage garage for the states _�•+�. ■■■ �.. ,.. ' � y� m regiona l asse t equipmen t was cons truc te d -s�- � � 1 1—� � � in 2012. It was determined that a separate, � - — � permanent EOC at this campus was _ _ � deemed unlikely because of the successful - �� ' . • ' , - � . � integration of all needs of an EOC into the '�f 9 : _ _ � interim spaces currently occupied. �' � �� - _ �_� ,rr- . ^ I - i ,- � V 1 � I Minneapolis EOTF Contact: � ��.,� � - , John Fruetel//Fire Chief ��'"' � .,� � r ��r'� �� 612.673.2890 r ',' �'�i - + '+•. � +�"' '�'� "� � �� _�� .. -�� Architect Contact: � i� , � ,,r„ W�Id Architects and Engineers R• � ` � " - � Joel Dunning � _ � ��'�' �, ��:� 651.227.7773 � �,,��'"�_ -,%:, �� +i� . - � - �� '�� City of Cotiage Grove //Architeciural Serviccs tor Cottage Grove Fire Station No. 2 15 ,�r � 2. STAFF QUALIFICATIONS � . � ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... � � Team �rganization `� � ! Because of their recent relevant experience on similar �;� �Qtta�e projects,this tearn is well aligned with your key . CirOVe objectives to help you be successful. In addition,we .��_r rity M have all worked together on numerous projects over ��i�a^��as� � many years. Our mechanical and electrical engineers � ` are in-house to provide additional benefit during the design process.All of our consultants would ' � - - be included within our design fees,as well as any ' Partner-in-Cl��arge additional consultants we may find necessary to assist '� John McNamara ' with key project issues that may arise. : AIA. LEED AP __ _ �' �' WOLD ARCHITECTURAL LEADERSHIP TEAM ,�, Projecl Manager �� Michael Klass � AIA, LEED AP `�� Pi�ojeci Architect Mechanlcal Engineer Emma Survis Jonathan Loose ,�� P,E, LEED AP BD+C �, Low Voltage Desiyner Electrical Englneer Michelle Kiein Bradley Johannsen �;� RCDD, WD P.E., LEEU AP BD+C �' ,�_, � I ��, 200+Arcl�itects. EngrnEers, and Staff � - - - �t, �� CONSULTANT TEAM � Structur�l Er�gineering Civil Engineering Cosi Cansultin� Ron LaMere, P.E. Dave Rey Bill Wolters � BKE'�f�i Engir�eers l�ndersor� John�on Associaies VV.A Wolt��rs Consultin�� , � �' :�' � 16 Cify oi Cotta�e Grove I'/Archilectural Services for Cotfage Grove Fire Station No. 2 �� , � -� � � � 2. ��AFF ��U�,I_IFICATICONS �r/'��`!' _.... __...__..._ ... . .. ...... _ _ _ . _ _. _ _ _ _ _ .► r,� _.... _.... ._ _...._... � � : �'�r�l-r�Lr-��p�l'��r'�� a ' John McNamara //AIA, LEED AP �-. � � : GFlp�� ifi � ifi�l��+c� ��cPOV@ Staf€" iikR �CfFH�hri; G➢N;A;: N��[� �g6:��itii�6ll:fl: � � � » Public Safety/City Hall Facility Cour�ciq » Fire Station No. 2 Master Plan » Office Building Renovation � ��' �� :��u� ��1 C��iu��ur.��t��:� » 390 N. Robert Street Renovation " : » Space Needs Assessment » 390 N. Robert Street FF and R � � � » Police and City Hall Additian/Renovation » 5th Floor Build-Out �� » Fire Station No. 1 Design » Energy Star Certificatian � �Qrchii�c4ur� �o�� u��a�h��o�ai�� F�� a�� h�d�d�ao�� ot� mf N�u►o Up��u University of Minnesota ; » Campus Master Plan » City Hall Remodeling .� ` » Police Station ��E��r ��;�!��A»pS,F ��'��'��fi�-"�� » City Hall » Public Works Facility � Saddleback College, CA : » Fire Station No. 2 » Courthouse Renovation : G i'��go c,� �s��P��rG��ll�r�u I��r�r » Law Enforcement Center � ��L� � » Police Addition/Renovati�n » Family Services Building As Partner-in-Charge,John is responsible : » Fire Station No. 1 Master Plan �G�� >�ti��V��n„��y�� for governmental facility planning and : ��;�� «;� �.�3;g��va.rllf�� » Hutchinson Area Transportation Service design projects. He has a great depth � » Police Dept. Space Needs Analysis » City Hall � of experience in new facility planning. ; » New Police Station » Community Event Center John has special expertise in working ; ��,�� ur� ��ri�Gea:-u��it�� !��Fvu»�r:p��h�� u�pr��r��r "� with municipal clients to understand their : » New Police Station » ACF Master Planning � needs for operationai objectives while : » Fire Station Study » ACF Boiler Study navigating the political environment for � » Fire Station Renovation » ACF Work Release Improvements � municipal facilities,ensuring expectations : ��,F r,;�, ��,��r��,r� ��;.�.�,� » Hennepin Family Justice Center are met.John brings more than 21 years � » New Police Station �ity �f f�w��i�� of experience designing public facilities : » New City Hall » Historic Fire Station with Woitl to the team,and will provide : �ot9� �u� k�a�6��0�� Ramsey Gour�tg � excellence in leadership and professional : » City Hall/Public Safety Facility » Courthouse/St. Paul City Hall Renovation service through his energy and passion for ; �;;,��y, �� , �n��„i; » Law Enforcement Center Courts � your success. : » Police Headquarters Renovation » Juvenile and Family Justice Center � �:�i�i�f �h� ��aV'G��t��r �et�r ��„�Btv iiur r�:�dc= E€c!p�: � : » Police Station Master Plan » Public Works Facility � �K��i a�f V�9oo�sia�k �akota Countp '� � » Public Works Facility » 911 Communications Center � : �P�� .��u_�G��?�� » Administration Services Adtlition and : » New Jail Study Renovation � � » New Jail Site Study » Northern 5ervice Center : » Courthouse Renovation �,�4��u��yt��r ��eP�� ,� = �P�d•d�� uu��n� » 911 Communications Center : » Law Enforcement and Human Services » 2025 Campus Master Plan �� Study » Courts Remodel and Expansion !i tE �b:��[�Ytl �laelkUk�� i1G�Ce��g� �.i��iCi��ii� ,� � » Courthouse Renovation » Law Enforcement Center ' �lo�v�r��o��rr�gq » Justice Center �� ; » Courthouse Remodel '� City oi Cottage Gi�ve i;r Arc�.hi�eci��r�il Sen�i��1ur C;ottagE uroi�c Fiin �:t�j;i�� f�!o 1 �� 2. STAFF QUALIFICATIONS � �"' ..........................._............................................._....._..................................._........................................................................._............................................ � �� , �, , �f� � Michael Klass // LEED AP �� I : RO�� , ' Michael will serve as the Project Manager,coordinating budget, schedule,construction, �, i : antl details from start to finish. As a highly experiencetl Project Manager for Wold, Michael � � is responsible for the tlaily management�f team resources to provi de you a qua li ty projec t I " � ; guaranteed to be on time and on budget � _ � Cn�� 1 ��i��-��dnc; P,rr��;�. ��r�isey County � » Public Safet Cit Hall Facili » Courthouse/St. Paul City Hall � ��1��`I�i� Y I Y �Y University of Minnesota � » Fire Station No.2 Master Plan ��n�a9�s� �-'��n��eqr � s Q,��, ��u E��7�.��lii�w » Law Enforcement Center : » Space Needs Assessment ��6�1`�� 9Qa�� , : » Police and City Hall Addition/Renovation » Law Enforcement Center ' » Fire Station No. 1 Design » Administration Addition/Renovation F : �i�y �N I�-�n�6��a�B� �l��Auc�b�� Q;aar��wui�p� - � » City Hall I Police I Fire Station » Law Enforcement Center Remodeling � �dP�q.� Gk'E �''��c�� ,��h,�' ��'UBUP�t11a9 ��;:�11L�loV�� » New Police Station » District-Wide Facility Analysis � � » New City Hall » Middle School � � ��r a� ��-�Ilp�r�� F�� '� • � » Police Station Remodel � : » Fire Station Master Pian t' � - : ��'c�j�� .�I`�.��i��::°�� ,� � Emma Survis �� h � � �� LE �i � Emma will lead our architectural team as they develop the designs of the project. She has a � � - : great depth of experience in facility design and interior workplace layouts. Emma has special �; � _ � � expertise working with teams to accomplish technical, functional,and aesthetic objectives �` : for new municipal facilities. �� EDUCATION ` ��i�'�1'� �� b��E�;��s< < <��:;�� » Police Station Renovation/Addition �, Bachelor �t ��laiie�ta�r� � » New Public Safety/City Hall Facility » Fire Station Study University of Arizona,Tucson,AZ � » Fire Station No.2 Master Plan � ��!�� 't'''u,�� t��u��,'��,�: �, : C:rt4,`� �H� �du��R�a��.fP�Nfi�� » LEC Remodel ' » Space Needs Assessment 1��`��GB�� 'oE��o�� r..a��rnrrt��r �� : » Police and City Hall Addition/Renovation » New Justice Center ; » Fire Station No. 1 Design l��>>r:��;;.�:� ��;��r��;�� : ��, � � :fEi�� l�� » School/Caurthouse/AnnexRenovation : » CityHall ��ill ��,,�� I�,_�I�� .��,��:� �' � : » Police Department » Village Hall Renovation/Addition � » Fire Department �` � : r-°Rt�? �f RKta��cP��o� �,,.,,r�l:c C M � . � � �8 City of Cottage Grove!i Arrhiter.tural Services for Cottage Grovc Fire Stati�n f�u 2 � � t" � __ __ � � � 2. STAFF QUALIFICATfONS � � o ........................................................... .. ....... ......... .. . ........ .. .................... ................ ... . __ __ __ � � ___ i � �' � � � � � �� I : Jonathan Loose // P.E., LEED AP � � . : ��,� � I � As Lead Mechanical Engineer,Jonathan's experience with renovation and new design � � ; projects for federal,state, county and municipal govemments provides a solid background � of high-performing system solutions. He ensures the mechanical engineering needs af � � : the client are met and that an economical, quality solution is delivered. He will provide an �'_ ; accurate assessment of inechanical systems and design optimal solutions for Fire Station. � [';�ru6)',i�II'Il(If,� ��IC�IB�OP U��CQ�S➢�� ithl�l�"i� l�or�l��'��'Gt;f I � iu�j�� ( ��Irir��r:if � Mechani�cal ��qxfH�,�LE�f�,1r,��,�i ' » Jail and Annex Demolition » Northern Service Center Valparaiso University : » Govemment Center Boiler Upgrades � i��u� �,�� i �•�,I�F��_�� i� �,�� : » Government Center Remodeling » Facility Analysis � » Courthouse Remodeling V��s�ne�Qn Coi�da��r � : �oi�f'r ��t �up�ti��=;��roG�es » Vertical Lift Upgrades ,� � » Space Needs Assessment �,��u� �;;��e1,��r� : » Police and City Hall Addition/Renovation » Sheriff's Department Study ,� : » Fire Station No. 1 Design ��q� �� h�a��o�d �?ke��. � �� '� » City Hall Renovations � � » Facility Analysis Nietropolita�A ��e�,�E7��yc� '• ��"��y��Y » Office Building Renovation �.� : » New 911 � �-- : ;.,.� ,� ��:P��:(v..�B f�i-'<�� ' � r�:��i�t o,= :- , : Bradley Johannsen // P.E., LEED AP � .� e� � � C��1IL.� �� ;� � As Lead Electrical Engineer, Bradley provides leadership and engineering c�nsultation. He � ; will ensure quality through all construction phases and will guarantee an uninterrupted �� / ` service delivery through efficient and reliable power systems. Bradley's experience in the i � ` : public sector gives him a broad understanding of the high level expectations of seamless �� L�I::E•�[�C��`i�6��6� � electncal systems design. ,� L��,�o�uu�a�p �u��€��E�g : ( c�� i �'��irHh�b��s`D��r ��t�r ��C IVi� �r,� ��"G��_��.��A� University of lowa � » Space Needs Assessment » ECFE ;� : » Police antl City Hall AdditionlRenovation � o��y�� ;f€�a��ar.��f t�E�V6.�. � » Fire Station No. 1 Design » Community Center Commissioning �� ' �� '�`'��'��a«�� » Concession/ Computer Room � » Police Department �yg�� .� k�yF��;,�w�,�;.,�;, �j ' » Public Works » Federal Bureau of Prisons ( �f�� i��i' hiriu��A�:��< g�s��'u= f�� [��r��._� Ku��air�i� •� ` » Emergency Operations Training » Northern Service Center : » Facility Emergency Generator �rd�,�.��9�# ��o�:l�^ �� : c�:�u��F ��i a�l��E.Go��N:: �FG��;�� » Courthouse � » Community Center I�A�;�� rb��ra�fl�:�� `'� � �:�� r� f�"�h��r�,t fi��H�r� » Courthouse Remodel � » City Hall Remodel '� � » Public Utilities �. " Cit��ni Cr�t1��e Gruv� ;;�Arr,lii[ecf�_iial Services f�ai C«tt�ge Grove� Firr '=;taiioi� I�Jc� 2 ��'� . '� r � - I >. �>l��G F �zJlJ�1l �� C_/-\��C)�vI�; � � � � ................................................_.._ '� . . .................. ........................................................................................ .._........................................................ � � �..�'aVi,� �/��tt�l�� I�f��=��` � : Michelle Klein, RCDD, WD // Wold Architects & Engineers � � � �� ,� � � T} ; Michelle Klein has been involvetl in telecommunications and datacomm for over 25 years. � � u- ` � She worked as a network systems administrator for five years and also spent eight years �i +_ � ' ; working for a Minnesota school district in numerous technical roles, including WAN,voice, I . : and data systems administration. Michelle has over 10 years experience specializing in � � ' ' � � '... �.�� structured cabling design for low voltage systems and voice and data systems design. She is a � : Registeretl Communications Distribution Designer(RCDD)and Wireless Designer(WD). �� - , - - : �tr��r��R �o�c�ir��-�r ,�� Ron LaMere, P.E. // BKBM J�� i�i : R�LE ~ ' : BKBM Engineers provitles structural engineering services for 100 percent of Wold's projects. �� .` _ ' : The company has over 25 years of experience in structural design of reinforced concrete, : post-tensioned concrete,structural steel, light-gauge steel, masonry,and wood structures. "�� - — � � ��vil Engin�er �� '�� : Dave Rey //Anderson Johnson Associates �� ; ROLE C -''� : Anderson Johnson Associates has extensive experience in a variety�f civil engineering ` � activities for numerous public and private clients.Through Wold's long-standing ,�, ��_ �r : association with Anderson-Johnson Associates,the company provides civil engineering, '��,�� ` � � site work,and landscape architectural services for 90% of Wold's projects. ,�, ��, �' --..— — - — : ��:�� .S`�I�T1C��11'l� ""�f : Bill Wolters //W.A. Wolters Consulting '�' ' �' � I : ROLE � � �� ,� � Bill provides cost estimating services for all of Wold's projects. He is an integral team C� ,�, : member, continually guarding the cost side of the design process. He remains involved in �;-:.;;,i �: , ; projects fram start to finish,adding a crucial balance which ensures that design solutions t, " '�`� : remain within the budget. His broad experience has given him an understanding antl ...:��►:. _��•: - —' : appreciation of the nature of construction projects along with the need to address and solve ��, : challenges through creative,systematic,and knowledgeable approaches. �' 20 City oi Lottage Grove?i Architectural Services for Coi�lage Grove Fire Station I�o ? �� ,�� ?. ST/1rF �-)l1Al_IF1��,�1T1(�f'�I`: �' � , _ __.... _. _... ... _ _ � � �Z��E;r'C��`��:;-C.�S � � - - �� - -�_,_ _.� � - ---- - =-��'� . - �� . � � - �' - ={,- � � � �i� I � � �'� �� I _ � . .W _ _ _ _ i - - F�. _ ' . ' _ I l� � � CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE - � Fire Station No. 2 Master Plan '- � Rick Redenius//651.4�8.2855 � '�`�� I _� � �� , I� , _ _ ,_ _ • ' . '_-._ i_-� '�' I.t� II _.^:i i�ii' i� 1 � � — - - � CITY OF RICHFIELD = Public Safety & City Hall Facilities - - ` " .y Wayne Kewitsch//612.243.4500 "' — �. '- `°�� ,:�- , �3 � .----_._ �, � '��.��a�,... �_�r-..s,;�'�'�•._ � .,,.'r. _ -- ` _-_ ��l, ;��k/1�►�T,G. -� - - t' ��dir �� A _��. .�;�X`th��. Wr =— -- y„J� �. n� yF�,:4 , --� � �� - '�ib�"'�c _ , � (i- � - N� e 1 � -�� , ' � �� 'J' �-�'- � _1— ', � . o M F P ,J 1.y `_� � . ____ ---- � 1 . `-.= g� .�'..: � "�'f,�� - — -- --_— --- � �`—— — �� .� ' ' ._. �� -- �r� -- �� ' � . CITY OF MINNEAP��OS '�- - , ;�.-�,, -, _ - — ,�� , � Emer�ency A�er�tions Training - ? _ Fa�tllu�y� — ��; "� John Fruetel//612.673.2890 � y �� Citr oi Cotta e Grove� r'r �� Archite�;tural Services for CottagE Grove Fire aialiur� N�� 2 �� 3. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION � . . ..............................._.................._................................................................................................................................................................._,. ................... � � Pr4��t Visic�n Summar� : ................................................... s : Wold designed a buiiding th�t u��t nnl� �A��z��F�: �uo�,�� h��t��,� � Existing Fire Station No. 2 was constructed in 1972 with an but also perfec�GU rF��IIF��a�:��pFa�6yu��r:_;�� ;,��'�.��, expansion completed in the early 1980's. Over time,additional J�m Schug �, renovations accommotlated changes in departmental operation ��•� �� which included transitioning to a full-time Fire Department from a : To achieve these goals, the following are processes � paid-on-call model.This requiretl additional living space, improved ; ,�hich will center on our philosophy of focusing on your kitchen facilities,a fitness space,and a small day room. : mission: � Through the study process, it was determined that because of the � q pARTICIPATbRY �LANI�I�l� P��D�� age of the facility and the difficulty of adapting the building to the ' „ We listen carefully ,� changing needs of the Department,the existing facility would not „ All interests have input and all options are explored meet the long term needs of the Department. ' » Ownership of the outcome is achieved � » The outcome is an effective facility that is highly functional and Through our previous efforts in helping the City plan for these aesthetically pleasing � facilities we understand in detail the needs of the Fire Department. ; » The community has ownership of funds well spent When the Fire Department changed to a full-time department,the �� need for multiple Fire Stations throughout the City decreased.This ; � �p�� g�� y��; �y�N�,��,� led to a decision to discontinue the use of Fire Station No. 1 and ; „ We begin with a firm foundation �f your previous efforts '� Fire Station No.3 and to consolidate operations in Fire StatiQn : „ We listen and will work with you to establish project goals, No.2. Fire Station No.4 was determined to have value due to objectives and guiding principles '€ � its location in the Industriaf Park. This consolidation requires : >, Vtle will explore options and develop solutions additional space at Fire Station No. 2, including: » The outcome is a solution that meets the established criteria and �� budget » 12 Apparatus bays to provide for current and future equipment. '� » Expanded public lobby to provide space for visitors as well as a : � ��p��. �� private space for medical exams to occur.Additionally,space for a „ Designing for Cottage Grove community vision � departmental history display is desired. » Designing for a high performance workplace utilizing sustainable �. » Multi-use training and classroom space to meet the training approaches and operatiflnal efficiencies. requirements of the Department.These spaces could be located ; >, Designing for a flexible and adaptable City Hall/Public Safety � near the public lobby to enhance usage of these spaces by other departments or organizations. ' � �g��p��,;�� ,��g� �:�� , » Administrative office space that should be flexible to » In-house engineering expertise to leatl you through systems life accommodate future changes as the Department changes. cycle decisions E » Proper living spaces to accommodate the change to a full-time ; » Discussions regarding all of the metrics and outcomes to tailor a Department including a larger day room, private sleeping rooms, strategy to your needs and desires �� lockers, restrooms,showers, and laundry. Having these spaces remote from the office area and training area is also desired. � �Q��n �d��H�t�� m�� » 5kills training space, which is currently lacking,to include a ' » Helps manage total project cost flexible open classroom that can be easily modified for different » Starts with our previous budgeting efforts and confirms building �' scenarios,a training tower, and open space that can be used for c�nstruction cost and all related costs for site and builtling fit-out ladder training. : » A proactive approach to cost management during all phases of �� » Storage areas for equipment and supplies. Gear storage should be design centrally located near response vehicles and separated from the �' apparatus bays, preferably with doors and an exhaust system. �� ' � 22 City of Coitage Grove li�rchitectural Services tor Cottage Gro�re Fire Station I�o� 2 �� i � � �� 3. C)ESI(�N Af�Jf�� <�(=�f��k;l�?�1CilOfV� .l '�'1'1'�!�'� ................ ..... ... ............. .. .... ......... ........... ___ __ __ .. ___ ..... . _ . _ __ _ _ __... _ _ __ __ �`. ..... a � �f�CtlGl�?c�fiQP'�! ��C��1f111�(� �C�C't�SS � The goal of the Wold team is to make the entire process of planning ; b� �=r��+_�o��, '�i�f�� f�+�-I��_�?� ��a,�F��,°:; � ��=-ri��•,,; � for public facilities predictable and enjoyable. Our approach to Our experiences,and our team's subsequent expertise of Fire design includes a process for engaging the users and supervisors ; Stations and Pub�ic Safety Facilities will be leveraged, not to tell � in an interactive process that produces a high level of ownership of ; you what to do, but to inform Cottage Grove of what has been done the final solution from the users and supervisors. Our data gathering ; before, both successfully and unsuccessfully. This enables you to .� process maximizes the input and understanding of all participants. make more informed design decisions on how you want your facility � Preliminary and validation meetings assure that all needs are to support your operations. .� accurately defined and any policy issues are identifietl early in the process. - �3 � We believe the final outcome of this will be a unique solution that � will be"one of a kind° for Cottage Grove and for the community '\ � as a whole.We believe our user-specific product to be a cut above traditional programming documents that often simply produce room � � data sheets. ' � ••� � We understand and appreciate that every organization is unique � and the Wold team brings significant experience and understanding ; i , � � from working on common and unique issues confronting other i` . , � public agencies across Northern America. The methodology � � �lF:I�, ' —� stresses time spent on-site conducting interviews and observing � � °� � � user needs.This process is the result of a clear understanding that .� the most important design criteria is always derived from the people ' � that will eventually use the facility. While simple in concept,this �.� .� method assures that the right questions are asked and does not � , .,, im ose reconceived hiloso hies on the client. ° � P p P p l ; ,, ,�<<>;r: � __ Since the average lifespan of any public facility in America is up to ,�" '� fifty years, serious planning efforts must seek to anticipate future � ; - - growth antl changes in how you deliver services.We bring our - '� broad experience in public safety faciliry design to you and we will � assist you in assessing future growth by analyzing present and �- - - -_ - - - anticipated management goals, researching local demographics and ; Ga,i�V�Vo��k�� a S�u�r�s��ar� �-��rtu��FEr��g� � � ��nro��r., � assessing trends in public safety. Proc�.>s, » Core Planning Group must be empowered to make decisions � �a�r� p�e�e�a�� F�B��a�r��v� �� I��r��s��u��o �a��au��Il�u�,�r� » Core Planning Group must be willing to make decisions �r��,�� aB��i,�I�u�c:F�:; We meet with your stakeholders on their schedules to determine » Core Group requests information from input givers � needs and desires for each individual space being planned,from » Input givers' role is for input, not consensus decision � room organization and orientation, tlown to the smallest details, like » The more efficient the Core Planning Group,the faster the storage types, electrical outlet placement,and door hardware.This project can develop � input is clearly documented and distributetl to all participants,then directly transmitted to the Core Planning Group's review. � � � City oi Cottage Grove //Arcf�itectural Services fior Cottage Grove Fi�e Station Ido � �;� � f�i � 3. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTIU�I � � ... . ._ ......_ ..... .... ....._....... ... . . ....... ......._ . . ........ .. .... . � .................... ... ... ...... __. ...._ � Communications _ � �� PUi�l,o�' �V��:6��'T Public facilities are funded by public tax tlollars and � �� ; 1� need to ensure the responsible use of those taxes. '"��*-_ ,4�� •'�+��. �� We understand the need to communicate with all � - � � •' , � ��. - � � stakeh�lders,from the City Council to administration, ��i =---=-s ��•= =- :._��..,,.,:,: � staff,and the community.A great deal of our process as � _ � '"� "�- ------�---.-'' � public architects involves input from stakeholders that '� will affect project outcomes. In atldition,with a high- ' , � profile municipal project such as yours,we recommend a = � _ �---�---�— concerted and thoughtful approach to pubiic relations. We � , � plan to make sure the team communicates with the public, _ � ensuring ownership in your project outcomes as well as � � � � . : transparency with your stakeholders. �,,�- �, 1 Wold's breadth of experience in exactly these kinds ,,- '�', � , ,� 1 � f ;� of projects means we can help you understand the i �,y r r implications of your decisions long before they are i _ � ��'� i' __ � � �; implemented.We will work with all levels of the city � r to ensure ali voices are heard,and that information is - �� ! + , ._� +�� communica te d b a c k a b o u t t h e p r o j e c t s. -� � �- ' �� - �."� , 1 � � , �� s�, � � � I � �'�`II;!.i�`II� � f n�:J4f�r �Iq�--1i1� �. fi0�lh�lh�flif�'! �..��..f: � � � �' � '�� » City Council Updates �� y , . » Public Community Meetings �`', � � � �y » Digital Media(Web, Social Media, online interviews} ,� =tj'�- � l� '� � "• y 'E' » Press Releases 'I � � � �.;�� ' I r,� �� '. a, 1 As part of our basic services,Wold will include support �,+ .� � f . of public engagement for the project,We will work � � with in-house staff and administration to develop �� and communicate messages for all stakeholders and `� "� "'` attendance at public meetings and open houses. Our � �� , intent is that the experts with the most experience in this � � , kind of project will help you create the transparency you R ` ,� �, need to succeed. `� _ �, � ` y �. -- e ::r� � � .;�� . a r - �''� � I I � I �=- - _ �-� � I �� 24 City of Cottaye Grove il Architectural Services for Cotiaye Grove Fire Station No. 2 � � � - _J � � 3. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION . . ........................................................................................................................... � ............................................................................................................................... � '� : A Cost Management Process � �'��rr ��Pc . i`u-Foo� ��6�xK�°t, f�� nr��r��fir��c �r' ! We assisted in establishing the initial budget for the work and believe that the identified � u�'/ construction budgets are sufficient for the scope identified.We als�understand that the �; • � ' budget identified exceeds the original CIP budget established.We would work dosely with � �,�, ' City staff to explore any possible changes to the project that may reduce costs. We would ' accomplish this early in the design phase. � � � . � ��: ��'f�i�r i =1�,;;f��l�� L�u_r__� I hliUlirPiii:iliCS� 0$Y PF��r��tE� ��P.RU�Q�@t� �•� � �� Wold has served public clients almost exclusively since 1968.We have over 40 years � I worth of expertise in the management of public project funding.We understand the need �-` t�develop a bidding and pr�curement process which allows the design, construction,and � management team to remain consistent for all phases of construction. As detailed plans are developed,Woltl will estimate the cost of the construction in such detailed manner to easily � • � ` ``��'i'��' � find the break point between funding phases. � The Wold Team approaches budget management as an ongoing task,from the start of planning and programming through the completion of the construction.The public sector ' — clients whom we serve require this level of attention.We know that the planning for public '� The system Wold uses to manage I facilities sets the framework for future costs. Eighty percent of the cost for a project is � and control publicly-funded projects determined by the first 20% of the decisions. Therefore,we take the initial design phases involves a checks and balances system ; very seriously, because it is the key to future financial factors. � incorporating the following criteria: �x�ER3� ', Integration of all aspects of a project including building systems and building elements are � During the later stages of Design considered. Focus is placed upon the coordination and evaluation of functional and aesthetic Development and Contract needs within the assigned budget. Products including both materials and furnishings are � Documentation,we call in contractors, evaluated using all information available. cost estimator and vendors to check � our numbers antl verify cost.This final Specific cost and budget analyses ensure adherence to original budgets for the project. check gives us the "mood" of the bid Construction and installation documents and management provides the direction for � market and reinforces our estimates seamless process management moving toward occupancy. � prior to bidding. '�, � e,�ti,u��;� ��r ,r,�� ti�� u��;�w�r��i �� i Brooklyn Park Police Station Adtlition/Renovation $8,400,000 $8,300,000 ✓ � Wold maintains a file of regional building projects, Updet2d qU3fterly. Cottage Grove Public Safety and City Hall $15,900,000 $13,500,000 ✓ '! We have the ability to average gross Ri�htie�d City Hai�,Police and Fire $22,500,000 �is,5oo,000 ✓ costs for each specification section � and relate that Cost to a SpeCiflC ' Monticello Community Center Improvements $1,350,000 $1,283,000 ✓ � building type in the government .' Prior Lake City Hall antl Police Station $13,000,000 $12,975,000 I� ✓ market. � � �,�,��, St.Paul Park Ci1y Hall,Police and Fire Station $2,900,000 i $2,850,000 ✓ WOId'S COSt estimating staff WIII ' Farmington Public Works,Police and Fire Station $8,000,000 $7,50Q000 ✓ � complete detailed material take-offs and ; Ramsey County Law Enforcement Center $47,636,000 $47,234,000 ✓ cost estimates at intermittent phases. '� These estimates are checked against the ! crow wing county Master Pian Proiects $41,343,sso �4�,2o�,�a1 ✓ regional trends. � � � , Dakota Counry Northern Service Center � $30,450,000 $30,197,000 ✓ �� City of Cottage Grove //Arrhitectural Services for Cottaye Grove Fire Station No 2 �5 � � 3. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION �' . , ....................................................... .................................................. ..........................................._............................................................................................. � '�! ��'�l��l_�� (�C��C?I�� The Project Manager is responsible for managing the schedule. Wold will accomplish this by first working to establish a � milestone schedule for the project.We will then develop a detailed Outcome Based Agenda for all meetings that we feel ,� are needed to accomplish that milestone schedule.You'll find that we won't meet just because there is a regular meeting �— scheduled on the calendar.We meet to make decisions and move projects forward. We will not conclude each meeting until the tasks on the agentla are accomplished. '� As the project progresses,the Project Manager will monitor the performance and input of all participants to assure that � information is available and distributed as required and that tasks are completed in a timely manner. , � The key to successful schedule management is the whole-hearted partnering of the entire Project Team.Wold staff and ,�, consultants have teamed on numerous past projects and have a proven record of serving and listening to clients and responding to their needs. �� » �' PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE �� 2D16 2017 2018 M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J f M A M J J A �� Cantract Awani �i Schematic Desiyn ,�i SD Approvai Design Development �� DD Approval ,r i Construction Oocuments CO Approval � Biddin� �i Award �� Construction Dccupancy '�' E'` E1 C'. E' � C' 26 City of Coitage Grove G�Nrchiteciural Services for Cottage Grove Fire 5tation No 2 � � � ' � ~ 3. DESIGN ANL� CONSTRUCTION �► � . ............................................_.........._..........................,........................ ..... v ....................................... ...................._...._ ... . ... .... .... +� � : Fa�ilit� ��sigr� Pro�ess � • , , , : Designing to provide welcoming and accessible,aesthetic external facilrty desrgn wrth appropriafe � , , , use of space,adjacent uses, landscaping,and parkrng ~ » Context-sensitive design � �` » Campus master planning - �'��' � » Integrating the design with landscape and adjacent uses � '� � i +'� I liffl�s� ,'�,�i � �� C=�i ii� `,'i��,�o� (Iloi�i�,�l � i( fl;�ir, .� ' Our goal as designers is to establish a link with the people who view and enter the spaces that we : design,while adhering to the existing context,function,geography,and cultural environment. For � : example, Ciry Hails, Police and Fire should speak of the city, local citizenry representation and , , , ` services,reflecting the local culture and its values while eliciting pride,heritage,and respect.The � opportunity to integrate the design with landscape and adjacent uses will be explored to again meet the your overall mission and project objectives.The following are approaches: �� . ; » Review and integrate the Ciry's design standards � ................................................... , : » Maintain a scale fitting for the business and adjacent use along 80th Street "Wold developed a ��o�u�ard-lookiny : „ Create a connection that celebrates the adjacent park � master facility plan and City Hale I ,� design. The campus plan, City Hall and Post Office have aged well, � unified by the design standards that � 1Na�B�@ �N��N��n��4.�, � —Marsha!!N. Dahl, Former Mayor, City of Circ(e Pines � -- . , � � --- 80TH STREET SCIUTW -- -, -- � �- ,� � -- � ---�=NfW ROAD ACGESS- -- - ' �___�_ r__T_ i _ i i ' ,� ; ; , ' - - �NEW PARKING � � � � � ♦-- �--NEW FIRE STATION#2 � - ', I , ; �--;--� , ,_ ' � �` ; � y� , (36,000 SF) � - -`, � '�, '' ��---- --i-� 91 � i RETAININGWALL , �, , � '' � � i � �-3.5 ACRES � ��,'� v , ------� �----------------� ' -'� �r i �\`_, i t�, -_- , �' � -.-i s/ '-_ __ � � _ � � � � `� �'��.a � JQ �� ? �— '� �� - _ � � ; -��'�," � �-� �°Q � FUTURE WATER � F ' TREATMENT PLANT � _a � -- � , � ��----- ; � � --.-- -�� --�� ; �r- -, � � � �� - � � � --- ) 1-�---; PINE TREE POND PARK '::� �.�_ � ' '�� -f� � � � - 930 � � � _ ;�� ) � _ ;_ , ', � __` � - J � - = -- . 1150 � ' -_, 815T STREET SOUTH � r-- �-- -- , � -- _ , � � ; ; � � _' ' � � E„, ,'� .\. � i i �;--- i i n- � , � -------- ---' � � � I ` i M' � . �' � '�� . r i . � --- ,. _. . _ .�__. ` -- - -- ----- - -- , . ._ '� City of Cottage�rove l/Architectural Services for Cotlage Grove Fire Stafion No 2 27 � E 3. DESIGN AND CUNSTf?UCTION F � ..............................._..................,............................................................................................................................................................................................. ` F Design Factors — Fire Stations ,� �"frh=r�6��(r'I(6�4('� ��P lill�;�� ,I��' �,°n�Y�L�O�ALITY ��f��P��,:: ��i 3,;, 35.5 _�� Based on our experience working on other fire facilities, �— � � and considering operational ideas from our previous fire F �"�'"�315 �� °''�"'`� _ ��R" station projects,the following list represents potential fire }` station design factors to consider during the design af �' � 37-� � - z�-4 —� , ^5� � your new facility. GO.v�A�`:U\'fHIGLE �I TRAIIJI\�G 7R>.I�ER V .4E�LnL TRUGK � �` � E �-��,� .�� .� ,�� :: � �� lc�di" 2e-C)� 16'-�' Za�`„ �> � - � K —� �—� » Easy access to firefighters'gear � ��u��= V~ p�+e�_r�:c_ `�' oR� ;? » Easy access to engines,reserve vehicles,hazardous - o u � A'�16JJ+IVLE - materials response trailer and supporting equipment � ,�_, „_� » Easy access to major Gity streets K 6-ic y i' � K v�i � �nknve reucK� �aooe�TR�cK `�' �n� ,:�'i� � f �' _ �I�;� , _ � » Drive Chrough apparatus bay reduces obstructed operating � sight lines � - � � �-��=�� '�° � » Careful apron design and vehicle drivewayslsight lines � ■ BR��H TR��K ,� 6��-,T��Lr 1 promoting clear visibility � 314"1 c�., 31'�9 � FJ':GIH£3?35 � � fJ�l��'�L�� '�: ��I�IIP't �' I �I'.E�, 1 43-b' �3-b' 18'-0' � � � - �- � » Flexible for various training and meeting uses E Fu7URE ��,'� FUIUSE � �'✓ _ 1 �. � f�;�r��,��i��,�� 7a► ��V�=��i�o�� Yo[�sdF�g ar�th� ��.��,r��r�� t� » Appropriate sleeping rooms which allow privacy without _ � '� �—��'�� '��'= �� -� ��{�'I disruption from other adjacent activities � � E��,i r�,�, V R��lH4��K �` �,R�AT » Provide a day room which promotes firefighter interaction �� _ 28 � - � without disruption � vehicle dimensions » Consider day lighting/activities promoting wellness � _ —._ I 1.IN' _ — � � 1h'HEEL EASE� ;�� _— � r'0 /�l �AERIAL TRUCK —_ 33; G�''f- truck turnrng radii °'"T.� °�, ' ^ __na_�._.,�... ��, -�s ?o � � � 7' � Z� � L� � cR ° u �d � �a, c i l� ��Y�,. �. � �...��, �:. � ; I # �` `'� � ; � � � � � `�.y,` � ��J�� ,,,�a��Ta+.•�;aua��-10" _,.� � { . til�� / / PlA?FU�F+14�!'-��r'�^'.._ .�_. ` �� iNA�I.TOW��JLt"�•---"' � �\ truck turnrng radri �—_' -- _ _--- � 2� Gity af Cottac�e Grovc I/Architeciural Services ior Cottage Grove Fire Staiion No. 2 � � � ■ � � I � � 3. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTI�f�I '� �;1�!�'r!'� ..................................... .............. __ _ _____ . ........ . __ ___. . ._ . _.. _..... .. .. ..... ..... ._....... ... �'" � � � MAJOR CONNECTI�N MODERATE CONNEGTION SERVER MINOR CONNECTION � NITCHEH p00M � DINING GEN. EMEH. � STORAGE EQUIP. EMS �I�f°I".�-7'ICO i r`'If��il � I'(GPGI STOHAGE » Construct to"Essential Services"standards � LIVING I I GEAB � �' STOHACE {�(_'.f,ll�� '�;['�i�1� 1.E4f' � � / � » Secure administrative,emergency personnel and LIBRAflY ' GEAR equipment areas T— T pSN/LAUNUH � W - I � oonm aooMs S APPAHA7USBAY FUTUHE' � l^��D"¢�I�dB�G9�c �'i:;:;''ilr�: LAUN�RY MAINT. » Secure,drive-through garages � � » Rescue vehicles,fire trucks and support vehicles use � roo�noont flexible apparatus bays ' � WEIGHT — LOCKER ROOMS I ROOM HOSE TOWEP f„P;O�fil�f�l!liV�! � » Derive the most for each dollar spent PUBLIC » Balance operational costs,while providing a qualiry / WATCH LOBBY — EXAM � facility that allows the fire department to continue OFFICE STAFF / / achieving its public safety mission OFFICE I / � \ CAPT.RIEUT. CONF. ��8��8�� OFFICE � � » Room for department expansion and flexible to allow EMS � for changes in operations I CONF. — TNAININGROOM — TflAINING » Materials that can withstand 24-hour use �oMMaxo » Flexibility in space definition OFFICE i � iRAINING OFFICE �� 7 ,� f�: 1 , , . _ �'. ��I �'ii ��..r . io '� t � + i � -'� � �� _ :� ' ;�; �� ;�; ,, , � .�:�. �l _� ,��_ � � . _ .� ,� �=� _ `-.-C_ .i _ _- � � �' � • - � n � r�! �� _ y� - � -- _ -N-. Y -- `, � � City ot Cottage Grove ll Architecfural Services for Cot�a�e Grove Fire Stafion No 2 �� i� � 3. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION F � _........_...._..._................................_........................ ....._.............._................._ _....__............................................ .... .... .... ... .... ... .... G F � " - ' V1lc��c� �r�c�inP�rir�c� — C'c�c�rc�in�t�c� c�� a�tc�in��A� � _t Wold believes that the key to success for a project is a coordinated effort between the architect � �' and the mechanical and electrical engineering team.We have developed in-house engineering � to facilitate coordination and provide the highest quality service for our clients. i � C � _ ; As with any successful team effort, we know that communication and common goals are es- �. � ,• ` sential.We approach all scenari�s for engineering with the same enthusiasm:commitment to �. , �� do the best job possible,always think of the client's needs first, and provide proactive commu- �__ _ nication. C• HIGH PERFORMANCE DESIGN I �'llll�� r I II�I(]' �X��Ctdf;(:- f ri�;:II,tG;'6:iPk�U : � li �_ E �.Fr,�N��,,P.�� ,n�a�I��,;F; � » Heating and Ventilation Systems » LEED Certification Design decisions based on promoting ` » Boiler Plant Design » Energy Star Certification � life-cycle cost(operating costs), ` » Chilled Water Plant Design » Sustainable Design insteatl of first cost,can yield an » Plumbing Systems » FacilityAnalyses � owner long-term savings.Wold takes » Fire Protection Systems » Facility Planning E that notion of energy conservation » Geothermal Systems » Schematic Design performance strategy one step further » Ice Storage » Design Development �, and thinks of it in terms of integrating » Builtling Automation Systems » Construction Documents � performance of al I systems versus the ' » Power Studies » Code/Life Safety Upgrades E � independent performance of any one ' » Power Distribution Systems » Energy Analyses/Rebate Assistance system.Thinking in terms o�bundles, � �> Grounding and Lightning Protection » Construction Administration � or clusters,of systems is a strategy Systerns » On-site Observation » Emergency and Back-up Generator Systems » Commissioning we use on many of our projects.This � whole(total)building approach can » PA/Sound Systems » Post Occupancy Evaluation benefit from reduced first costs and » Master Clock and Program Systems » Project Management E » Voice and Data Systems the need for operationally wasteful ; » TU/Video Systems reduntlancies. � : » Card Access Systems » Camera/Video Surveillance Systems �r, ��fa driver� t�� „I��F� : » Building Security Systems Use of energy simulations and energy » Fire Alarm Systems � analysis of the performance systems is „ Lighting Design an essential step to optimizing building �, performance.We havethe expertise, �,` °��f�:��`�'° �� I�� I��:�,r_ ��i�,��,��,�E� � ��n��u� resources,and experience to effectively Wold brings Architecture and Engineering services together to farm an in-house use analytical tools to design buildings collaboration to better enhance our ability to service Cottage Grove. Having both � that achieve high performance through Architectural Staff and Engineering Staff under one roof is proven to have many advantages � the selection of energy-efficient ` to ensure the overall success of your project. systems and strategies. ; » Our LEED accredited architectural and engineering personnel have worked together on projects � for 50+regional public agencies ,� » Improved communication between the architects,engineers,and all client stakeholders. ` » Schedules are better controlled,budgets met and overall performance is enhanced,surpassing � client expectations. ` ' » Tailored and well coordinated contract drawings and specifications beiter reflect your desires � and needs. � ; » Cohesive integration of sustainable systems between architecture and engineering components. � 30 Ciry of Cotta��rovc ii Architectural Servic;es f��r Cottaye Grove Fire Station IVo. 2 �` �� 3 L)�:�I(::I� /�,I\C) C`C>[Vf;Tf�'L)C�IQI\� i, �, �;"� ....... ......._..._.._.___ _..___.............- � _._.,.... ._....__.. ......., , _ _ � �' � S�as��or��ak�l� ��ic�r� P�c��s� � � � We encourage dialog with our clients to elevate their expectation � ,� as it relates to their facility,and to understand their level of interest in applying various strategies.We know that the key principals of �, sustainable design can, and should to some degree,apply to all projects which we undertake.Wold believes that a solid design .� strategy automatically incorporates elements of sustainability, but we also believe that our clients'expectations are the primary goal .� on any of our projects.As architects practicing in a changing world � Y�V and as our public clients support sustainability issues in their � communities, Wold has developed an understanding and approach - � towards sustainable design. � � it�,-'f�u ' ft�fU6€�p�'�I�I��r,;, , _ � An energy model establishes a common baseline to accurately ��ERATI NG 61U�I�IT`� � model the energy performance and utility costs savings of each ��STS ENVIRONMEIVT option.The model's system components are fine tuned to reflect � � actual consumption of electricity, natural gas,fuel oil,and water. : Wold is familiar with many recognrtion programs that can provide � �'��i�- ��'�+��.bc- <i�o��:r : sustainable desrgn metrres,such as�ebates and tax r'ncentrues, LEED, We quantify the cost of options over their useful life.The life cycle : EnergyStarand the Mrnnesota Sustainable Building Gurdelines ;� costs are useful to capture not only the first costs to construct and ; (MSBG). the energy costs to operate, but also to account for variations in ,� periodic and regular maintenance,and fiinally replacement costs at � ��.��h��_ p,��yH� F�;�� ,�� :�o�e:x�ii�N� � a��i�r'I�� h�!�� i� � �<<<��I�� ,�� the end of a system's useful life. : » Minneapolis Emergency Operations Training Facility, Fridley,MN � � » Gordon Parks High School,St. Paul, MN � ��'t=f � �� °� : » George W.Gibbs Jr.Elementary, Rachester,MN � Useful Life Cycle data starts with accurate project cost estimates. All our work is in the public sector.We understand that successful : ��1��N�h ��uyp�-��6,� ��a;�u��k ��o�� tl�� ao��i��r��°=. � projects are within budget. Our three prong approach in monitoring ; » Ramsey County Law Enforcement Center,St.Paul, MN construction trends, relying on industry experts,antl tlrawing on : » Dakota County Technical College Information Technology � staff experience ensures accurate project budgeting. Improvements,�osemount,MN � » Alexandria Technical College Law Enforcement Training Addition, � � �,ri;�� +�_��i � _:��. Alexandria, MN � In understanding sustainable goals it is important to understand � » Hennepin County FamilyJustice Center, Minneapolis,MN that each choice you make as a client is based on a balance of three : � b1SIC 8(1d Oft811 COfT1p8tlfig Cflt2fla: FIfSt C05t, QU811ty Ef1V11'Oflffl211t, ; I�r��ulti Ir'��u�IC � i:: urit.<.' '�.r,l� u� +.4�j1'��iii f I�it�i__�i . i,�xi�� Is'��.1 r 1��:`�s'� and Operating Costs. Emphasizing one of these criteria has an : » Dakota County Northern Service Center,West St. Paul,MN(achieved � inverse effect upon each of the others. For example, minimizing 98% rating first costs may lead to compromises that impact the quality of the : » Redtail Ridge Elementary School,Prior Lake,MN � environment in interior spaces, or even lead to higher operation costs than what would have been realized with additional first � t'�� f��,p� �� trr ��` i�G�i �r � I �'��;I�� ,��rr ti!1��ui�t�; � cost investments. Our approach will walkyou through a number � ii��r��,i��i;u:Fl�i��;��;�° of different areas of focus to determine those goals and tlevelop � » Lakeville South High School, Lakeville, MN � solutions for those specific choices. � » River Falls High School, River Falls,WI � � � (;irR��1 Cnttage Grrn�e //Archilectural 5en+ices for Cott�gc Grove Fire S1al�ir,r� I�Ja � "�� 3. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION '� �'' ...................................................._....................,........_................................................................................................................................................................. � � ouR P�ocEssEs : A Quality Managemer�t Process `� ��sia�n Phas�: � 1.Weekly Coordination Meetings ' As architects,our reputation is on the line for every project and for each component of every � i 2,Weekiy Updated Drawings to FTP project.As a result,we have developed a process that addresses quality management.The �- � 3.Checklist for Typical Coordination responsibility for project quality management rests with the Project Manager.The Project Manager � Issues has control of all necessary Wold resources for the highest level of quality management � 4.Establish/Tested Detailing for � � Contract Documents Because of Wold's exclusive focus on publicly bid projects,we have learned the importance of I 5.Peer Review of Contract Documents identifying all risks and variables prior to bidding. Developing high qualiry,well-coordinated �S 6.All-tlay Team Coordination prior to construction documents as a result leads to a history of minimal change orders on Wold Documents being Issued i projects,most of them being Owner requests for Added Value. G �� 7.Utilize Only Addendum#1 to Elevate 1 Document's Quality : YJIkn;Ra� nux��+p��uoe e�1-;�� :�C��ti�tri�i��u ��:�� F��u .;.�I�u.�� fi�a.,��°��ar��a�:� �;�,��aA��g�� G ' Gool�t��a��oa�� 6y�S�� » The Project Manager develops a key milestones checklist 1.Pre-Construction Forum ` » The Project Manager frequently reviews updated specifications and technical information � , 2.Job Site Presence with Observatifln � ` » Each Associate monitors a technical discipline, updates master spec sections and regularly Reports updates Project Managers during in-house training programs � � 3.Proactive Tracking of Contractors i, ; » Every Associate participates in Final Review and signs off prior to issuing contract � (Weekly Progress Schedules) documents ' 4.Thorough Reviews of All � » The Project Manager and Cost Consultant perform frequent budget evaluations to ensure that � � Construction Claims the budget is met � 5.Revise and Submit Claims until Fair � ` » On-site construction observation and shop drawing reviews monitor compliance with the � Value for Cost Exists con trac t docum en t r e q u i r e m e n t s 6.Mandator y Contractor Pre- i� ; » Closeout process focuses on client satisfaction and works with the contractors to address all �, � Installation Conferences for Critical issues Areas �' — -— _— — �I : hB� �-��FB�:� �° i� r�-i��.�� f, .4c[f_°�Y�'C ______ ; Wold prepares every day for the quality of future projects.We do this by assigning each of �� ' v ............................. ; Wold's Associates to a specific,technical tliscipline whose issues they monitor.They draw --,;� ' ; information from their experience and from the master spec sections that they regularly update, � . �Y��''y �� and the most current information is then communicated to our Project Managers and staff via �� .�.. ; �� ; in-house training programs.All documentation for these discipli�es is available to staff from r �� , • '�� _ ; our in-house resource center. - J W°� ' � : �' _.,_. ,�`._, .._ � ,� ` � - h v i te . _ _. .__ ; Durin the review rocess at the end of the contract documents p ase,e ery Assoc a : � _ . .___ 9 P ��- �` .�-.._ , . ; reviews the project from the stantlpoint of their technical expertise and signs off prior to �° J�--' ' ; issuing contract documents.This process further benefits our clients because of our m-house � � mechanical and electrical engineering staff,who are able to review and respond to the project's � �� C;o ; needs in a prompt manner. By tlrawing on the expertise of each member of the Wold team,your -- ! '•;i ; projecYs quality is assured by their careful and expert review. � ` � � i � � � ��_��n�� I ��: I��e�.��C�;rf�fiir�� rr f!�i±c; �� ;��:k.;�: � ; The Wold team is extremely familiar with teaming with the owner on coortlination and utilizing p : the design standards on all rypes of projects.We understand that high quality, long lasting � � materials are usually desired by our public sector clients to ensure tax payer money is spent � ` ; wisely.We have built our library,specifications, and details to address this desire but are happy ��,/ ; to tai lor our approach to your specific needs. � � 32 Cityr �i Cottaye Grove il I�rchitectural Serviccs 1or Cottage Grove Fu�e Statlon I��o 2 '� � � � i�� ii� �_I�,i �,if ; , ,i,,�_,�I�i��;�: ;j� ��,� � r�;��I i ..,......__..._._..._...._...,. _ _ __ _ _. .......... ........_. ......_ .. � �R� _. . � � r _ � I `�i, l� �r � Consistent Team from the Beginning to the End � Our efforts during construction do not start with a hand-off to a construction observation person. The entire Wold � team who was involved with the project's development remain on-duty when construction begins.We believe this approach brings consistency and accountability when interpreting the design intent during implementation. � `'�R�'fi`�9.6f�o�iV��i�i� ( tiai,f�'��fo f.fhUil; �{�& g"„dDN'Fu [o 1..;� � 1 �:{1��6�i&�� ([i!�'uf 1��, � Coordination of systems is vital to a project that is on time antl on A thorough understanding of the existing building conditions and budget. In addition to Wold's commitment to quality during tlesign quality set of Construction Documents are the best defenses against ,� and construction documentation, we demand the contractors full change orders.We are relentless when investigating the given participation in construction coordination. Each subcontractor must conditions of your facilities to minimize the surprises. Once on ,� work together to understand and proactively work through any site,a team-oriented approach with the construction trades creates potential conflicts.UVold will participate in construction meetings an environment for developing no-cost s�lutions to unforeseen � and coordination meetings with the contractor and their trades conditions. to ensure a smooth, uninterrupted construction schedule. This � includes coordination for startup of various systems at the end of If legitimate revisions are required,we f�cus on ensuring that our the project. client receives the added value at a fair price. We first review the '� submitted costs and then recommend acceptance, modification or ��'�h�r�-��h«e�e��fl��dP��e�� rejection depending on the validity ofthe costs.When submitted ''� It is especially important once construction begins for the Owner pricing is acceptable we recommend a change order. Wold does not and Design Team to have a collaborative relationship. We believe charge our clients to resolve the unexpected surprises. One of the '� our role in the partnership is extremely important to resolve benefits of fixed fees is the avoidance of cumbersome accounting � construction claims.We believe that following are essential parts of for changes to the work. Therefore, under our recommended fee Constructio�Administration: structure,there are no fees associated with change orders. � » Evaluating all claims to ensure the Gity is receiving fair value � » Rejecting claims that are not supported by the construction tlocuments 3 » Modifying claim amounts to match fair value . , � » Provide written responses on claims supporting the City's "� � — -� I .� position ' �^ - » Adding deadiines on claim responses to force resolutions � ��} � in a timely manner � � �,��, » Include language in the Contract Documents that lets the City �{ ! � determine the course for dispute resalution ''� �� _ . � �- » Support the City wi�h documentation to present in arbitration ' .�,' �,��--- , � �1�;f't�`M � » Make recommendations on the strength of the City's position,to _-� ,�;-�f -""'�� '�"`� determine which dispute resolution track shouid be taken � r �� '�� ; Fm�� '� »:::.�m:.:��.�i = .a�mi - �� . omE.r.ri+.e.�� -- os�.as��w�!! � ... i i� - m��w��s�a�� _ —. We treat your budget as if it was our own. In fact,we hate change ;. �,�I', � � - ��°; , Q G��;;�� __ � orders as much as you do! It is our job to make sure contractors do �_ �� ' / � _ � ��' j`��`• � ! .�� , n o t t a ke a dvan tage o f a si tua tion on a jo b site. Providing guidance � yAm�m�� ' � _ _ ��a�, through construction disputes is just another example of Wold � ;$�.b��v��e_ � '��;�w��; � ''�o � standing by you for the life of the project. � �;;,��;��;�� _� ��e��,�°��$z _ __ � � Gits� of Gottaqe Ur��r�� ;��Architectural Scrvir,e� fo� (:��ttage L;rt�ve Fir� �;ia1i��,n PJa 2 �� 3. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTIC�N '� . . ..............................................................................................................................._....................................._............_................................................................. � � - . �- Added Value for the City of Cottage �' � �rQve � `� � � i� -'��' � I. _+ '� ' Best Value Procurement Process ` � � - _ � ` � � - � ��I'� � Best Value Procurement is a process that is allowed by Minnesota M �� ;�I� -`'Ir � ' State 5tatute whereby State Agencies, Counties,and Municipalities G - ��,�I '�� — �;' �r �� y�;l ,,�"'—'' ' can select their contractor through an evaluation process similar to how you are selecting your Architectural firm.Working with your � _ _ committee process, EDA,and City Council,we would help you - G . develo a set of criteria includin cost ro'ect lan and a roach, - IM � ,�� p 9 , p J P PP �� project challenges and solutions,value added ideas,and the - � ��^° `_ ��,,'�� contractor and team experience. G� � ,, --; _�_ � We have current relevant experience working with the City of Cottage Grove,the State of Minnesota,the University of Minnesota, � Carver County, Carlton Gounty,and Hennepin County participating : in and developing Best Value Selection criteria that ultimately E : created a construction process that was collaborative, minimized : construction changes and resulted in highly successful outcomes. � � � ' � � . _ These projects included: F I � � �� ;,��: �a� ��4ei��lE qu��Rk-Transportation Building Granite Facade ,,,_ ' -- �4�:� - i''� , ; Reanchoring Project E � `�`-` ' » ��a�� fi fViid��'��#e��F��-Administration Building HVAC I��1 1 � n�� 'i:s �IIIIIIII111l��, � �� . '"'�r;.__ . '. . � � Upgratles E - �_:�--- �� » Carve� �a��aa��-Plumbing Fixture Upgrades - > Carlton County-New Community Services Building � '� » City of Cottage G��E��4��. -New Public Safety/City Hall ' ��ranepin Cou�to+ -Government Center C-6 Courtroom � ` f - J Remodeling,ACF Kitchen Addition,and New Emergency Communications Facility, 911 County Rem�deling r � .,J� Each of these highly successful experiences allowed each client to � develop criteria specific to their projects goals and objectives.All � the contractors who have submitted proposals have commented that � this process gives them a chance to present value to a client that �; ,� ��4�;��;�-„F,,� , in the end does not rely on only price, but on how they approach � � ��'��-,�i-, ;! 1� :. the project. In the end each project resulted in a lower overall ,. R�_`= �� , �, i��+� construction cost as well as a highly satisfied Owner. _ �_� M � �iid,��, - � =� �Y�li��9l�-;, � �� - _ - � j - M * 34 City oi Cottage Grove!i�rchitecfural Servlces for Cottage Grove Fire Station No 2 � r '� � � CC)S�M� f='12C>f�C>S/\I� '� � .............. ... .................._........... ............................. .. ..... .... ..... ... .... . ............. . . _..... . _ _ _ . . ...... _ ... � � !�. staff �nv�alverr��r�t k�y Pr,c�s� � � Identify key staff, consultants,and positions for each of the phases proposed for this work � � `� � ¢� e� c a� � �o �`t' � o`' �¢' �¢' ¢; ¢;�� e� i �� ao' j�•¢' c c�,c�' .c`��o� w O�'� �� Q�` ��a � �`',� �`D �`b� � �` ��,\`'`D � �� \��.,� � �c�, ��'�m �� e� .�.�,� �� o�,c�n� a `�� Jo �,°.�,j ��'c�,c�' o o`' � >� i.c � o� � o�, � i`4 � � � �� e� .� � G Q`� �` Q� �e' Qj �¢' � �o�,i Q`a�: �� iCil('�!IL%i�ll'. �)LiO��il�ll X X X X x � Uesiyii Uevelup�iiN��i X X X X X X X X X � � Cr�risfriiciion l7or.ui��;ui= X X X X X X X X X � f;i�l,lii�,; X X X X X X X X � f�;�_t!�i��,t�+irli�i�il�,ii��,u�i;lr,ili�tii X X X X X X X X � � '�i � � � � � � � � � C�i�y�ui C��1�q� (;iu�� ir'llrr liil��;lui��l ;��r��.��u�� t��r�,�>>I��q�(,ar,��.�� u� �;fali�;ii I•,I�� .�';, � � � ?. C�ST PROPOSAL � , <, ........ . ... ....................... ..._ _.._.. .._._ __ ... ... . _.. __ __ __ ...... _......_. � � �o (,�mp St��m C�c��t �y Phc�s� � Wold proposes establishing a fixed fee atthe project onset. We r ��. �f��r�i��,� b��y �� k-i��oor��: � provide a comprehensive package of professional design and Based on our involvement to date in the previous Space Needs As- ,� management se�vices for each of our clients.All engineering sessment,we have developed an in-depth knowledge and history of and consultant services are provided in our fee.We believe by items discussed and decisions made to bring you to where you are ,�, establishing a fixed fee for each project, based on an agreed upon today.We believe we should both benefit from these previous efforts construction cost,this eliminates the potentially negative dial�g ' and propose to credit the total of$8,000 received for the Space � that often happens regarding extra services. Our"basic services" Needs Assessment against any final fee agreement. contract with you goes well beyontl what some other architectural E firms would provitle. Our commitment to you is to agree on a fixed We value the previous work you have done in space programming fee and not request additional fees unless the scope of the project ; and planning and expect that the efforts of confirming the program C� changes significantly. will go quickly and will do this confirmation at no cost to you. If we ` have misinterpreted your project budget,we are happy to enter into � We consistentiy propose fixed fees based on the approved a discussion flf the topic. E construction cost and for this project,we are proposing a fixed fee based upon 6% of the cost of construction. : Additionally,we believe in long term client relationships and do not E charge adtlitional fees for following-up with any warranty or project The City Council has discussed the overall project budget for this completion items aiter you occupy the building and will not send � project at$9.1 million. Construction cost is identified at$5,850,000 you a bill for additional work in getting the builtling done right. plus$100,000 for the demolition of the existing Fire Station No. � 2. Our not to exceetl fixed fee including all work provided by our I��Tol��r� �;r F. �>=ir� f��s�..�E consultants is based on our interpretation of that project cost and Customary reimbursable expenses would be in addition to our � the following calculation for architectural and engineering services. fixed fee proposal and typically run between $2,500 and$3,000 per million in construction for projects like this one.We would estimate � Our fee calculation would be: our reimbursable expenses would not exceed$90,000. Customary reimbursabie expenses include: � New Fire Station No. 2 Construction ; » Mileage in connection with the work. $5,850,000 x 6%= $351,000 ; �� Printing antl copying � » Phonecharges proposed Fixed Fee ; „ Postage and mailing C Less$8,000 $343,000 » CADD/Reprographics � Fire Station Demolition ' $100,000 x 6%_ $6,000 ; These customary reimbursable expenses would be billed at cost proposed Fixed Fee ! without mark-up. Bid set printing is not included as a reimbursable � expense, but would be directly billed to you to allow you to save on � Fire Station ! sales tax. Breakdown by Phase No. 2 Demolition � �i��i_��ru��1� .��ri��,��ti� f.��U'B➢6� Schematic Design $51,450 $15,000 1. Furniture, equipment signage, and blintls would be calculated at Design Development $68,600 $20,000 6% of the budget for that work. � Construction Documents $137,200 $40,000 2. Commissioning of HVAC systems calculated at$0.85 per square � foot of building being commissioned. Bidding $17,150 $5,000 � Construction Administration $68,600 $20,000 � Total $343,000 $1D0,000 : � r 36 City o( Coftage Grove li Architectural 5ervl�es lor Cottage Grove Fire Station No 2 � r � ' `� `E� 4. COST PROPOSAL � , , .................................................................................................................................... �� ........................._.............,.................................._................... �� : C. Project Availability and � �� Conf�i�ts ,�� The proposetl team is available for the scope of services for this project.We do �`� not have any actual, apparent,direct, indirect or p�tential conflicts of interest �� related to the services to be provided. �� : �. S�k��c�r�trc��ar� �v�rvw�� d1°� : �U�� 9a�ue est�p�C��6�e�V V�f�y ��:o�� B��io�ys�odg�r with specialty consulting �� for Structural Engineering, Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture,and Cost Estimating.We believe these bng standing contractors understand our work and �� ' bring value to our clients.The following is a list of our proposed contractors for : this project and their office locations. `_"�' �� BxBM � �� ENGINEERS �� BKBM Engineers 5930 Brooklyn Blvd '� Minneapolis, MN 55429 E� � � Anderson Johnson Associates, I�c. �� 7575 Golden Valley Road-Suite 200 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55427 �� W.A. Wolters Consulting �.� W.A.Wolters Consulting 4650 Kingsbury Drive �" Eagan, MN 55122 �� . B� '--�� City of Cotfa�e Grove ll l�rchiteciural Services for Cottage Grove Fire Staiion No 2 37 � � � . � ......................................................................_............................,. .........._... _.................................................................. ......................................... � t -� -r� g ', O,�/h� 11�n l��' E �;�r, � - � "� We greatly appreciate the opportunity to present our firm, our beliefs,and our pr�cess for 4�,. �a' ', your consideration. Not only do we believe we are the best firm for this project,we believe � I", ,v'� ;,;y,�,r,'i`� , ��; ��` �i�i._ : that this will be the continuation of our long term relationship with the City of Cottage Grove. �, � ��r, ' Our proposal gives a great deal of relevant information, but we would like to leave you with � ! �;. ,I, � � these closing comments on why yau should choose Wold: '�= ,.:� E � �� ;;-,�; � � �:.Y''4c=f'�'IiSVB��NI�b�lt4t;GbGk 6�'Q"et�kG f . li;,��i I �' l€:W'S1!(�l, iiJ ' i ' l�: i',< �hi�°"��-> � I '' ��G y ��,, We have no preconceived agenda for what we think your project should be. We believe E` �'�� :,. �'`�a our job is to ask the right questions to understand all of your needs,and bring innovative � solutions to solve those challenges. E ,,�� f� ` i No other firm has as many tools and processes focused specifically on gaining feedback and �-' 'r r input to guarantee your involvement and ownership at every stage of the process. E � � � ' �Nkh `�r�:,B�N�G-s� ._ [a� u�r�ui� f'I�uIrVN�«� P�� f, ��:i oit�g��ill��:k� Of f712etIflgS Or hOUfS fOf 8 gIV811 phBSE i�, � L : or task.They are full service and inclusive of anything necessary to make the project a E '��''�I - ��-�� ; successful experience for you. �� --- '� �' �l �' ' �i�k�t ��rQ��¢,�ti ��u�4:E��ti�� e� ��E� I;'��a;'iiuinE; C ', We understand how decisions you make today should not limit future opportunities for the ' solution to adapt and change. Our process focuses on asking questions nat just for today, � � but for the future. ��,,,r —�_ , ' � �=` � '^", , We work with dozens of public sector clients to give you greater insight on how others are �. ��""�— �=-�— hantlling similar situations and to inform your decision making process. �' i � 1 ' ' i �� i� , i--� ��i,;� i ��,�< < ��! � � �� ; � i i� � i�+ � a�i � I�Vi rlif��i�� i�l--III:u li• I��I i I �.,�°.� I-� �—�-.6�f r, o; l�iri ;ill��6� � = '{'",""�' ` ' When we develop a new relationship,we expect it to last for many years to come.With this � _ �.. r_ ��i.' � .I •,. ;,, _�,� in mind we take a more cautious approach in considering the implications of every step we ■� ! ' � �`�� -e �-� take and its impact on your community and future stakeholders. � � ►,� ' � We don't disappear when the project is over.We intend to be around long after the study � „ � � I � ��' ', is over to help with any on-going issues,future planning initiatives, or facility questions— � ; whatever you might neetl. F .i � E � , F � We are excited about this opportunity. '" - - - i E �� Our goal is for you to be successful. � E � � 38 City of Coftaye Grove I/Architer.tural Servir,es�or Cottage Grove Fire Statioii No 2 F F Wol • • . � - • - r_. n -r�r n r_ � r r� n v F- - �``` - �i�, :,,, � , _ �` �. . � tt � �f S' � ;�If �� . -.� _ ' ;,, - �• .. i': �� ' r� f�-�M��lg►' � --- --- -r _ I� ! � � � _ F� 1 � � � � �T - � . _ , _ . , _ , , �. , , , , , A enda g Introductions 1 . Firm Overview and Background Information , » Project Team and Experience � » Previous Fire Station Work » Communication and Coilaboration » Site Challenges and Opportunities » Why Wold? 2. Formal Prepared Questions 3. General Q&A Cottage You r Team . . Grove "�e Pr�a�d��speritY Meet Partner-in-Charge Our mission is to John McNamara AIA. LEED AP make you a happy WOLDARCHITECTURALLEADERSHIPTEAM client by delivering a Project Manager s u ccessf u I p ro j e ct! Michael Klass AIA, LEED AP Project Architect Mechanical Engineer ' Emma Survis Jonathan Loose ; P.E., LEED AP BD+C Low Voltage Designer Electrical Engineer i Michelle Klein Bradley Johannsen I RCDD.WD P.E.. LEEQ AP BD+C WOL�S :�ti��[�G�.� 200+Architecfs. Engineers.and 5tafl CONSULTANT TEAM Sfruc[ural �ngfneering Civil Engineering Cost Consuliing Ron LaMere, P.E. Dave Rey Bill Wolters i BKBfvi Engineers Anderson Johnscn Associafes W.A.Wol�ers Consulting B � . , , enef�ts We Br� n g ' We bring benefits that will immensely help you achieve success: » We know you, your values, and this project » We know how to implement quality projects » Our processes will ensure communication and collaboration , » We know your community and we know how to I engage the community » UIIe know high quality, durable systems Vlle have a great work plan and approach to gain consensus and deliver the best solution for Cottage Grove DurValues : The Wold Wa i • � We take a long term posture towards our client relationships. We listen to what is important to you. We helped to get you to this point '� - and now we'd like to continue our I collaboration working towards ; � .�-�-. - � your success! � ; i , � , , YourVital Concerns _� ,. C�:,. _ �'_:: --��,�� ;�� - �� ``'� �� i�'� 1 . Renlace 1912 Fire Station with a .�'.� �;.:�� M � -�'� � �� '(, . . . � -- ��,�` ��'�� • _ �:, y�� modern facilit that will meet the � ��4��"i —.r�� Y � � �`�-�+'��!�'� � �►- �� =�'� lon term needs of the �.t� ,_�� g .�-- . �i r �- - _ -`-- -- Community � �;,..�:=,� _�,.��;-� _ - -- _ L ��'q�� , �'. __ I .�� I ��1 �� _ I � �v � � _ � _ __ - �'�"��.�`� _ � �- ` 2. Consolidation of services from -- .:, _ �� ;��= —��, _=s� four stations to one main station ; I' � - - � � ' :s - � ,,� , � with one satellite facility � - �� _„`_ - - - 3. Improve training facilities for �� . � full-time staff and paid on call � -�--� _ - `- - - - . - , , Ex ertise p ��tyo� � � � �� :�IUUU - -� �R�� :��_�:� , j . � ; � �,ti�q� I 5-OrER 'S4iOrER � � � R� . � C ?hlh6 TQANPIbCBRER �--� � � �w5 rn.�mx+6 � - �R¢c� pi■�� _.R. Lh�t�:G - � -' �mn �� . :SBr ��' ',��.�I v� � �QOOP+ �T � - _ _""--y'.'.� ��. ii..� �►oy► 7 !�� _ B Fmi� w�rcn aoc•• o�� OfFGBzS�� Fuu.fiME ST,�.F. COMMwvD U�i1.EUf. c � .� '^":'`. U .� 1........__ �`� ..�'`.�.... ..rnw wG - . : ,.. ,.r..=' N0. Z .......... ............... - _: __,�.=v�^= J : �J�'u �tc^s�iDil �G s �:f `\ : Upper Level Plan Main Levet Plan — � .� _... .... _ _._.._... .... � e��_ - _.... ..__ ___ ........_ �_ � ' � y� � �� _ -�•�i_ �"� � � - _�' � : �� ._I�_� I �-I-� - � _r� - ' � i� �,` � � �� ,.t . i _ �;. �- _ �� , a � ��' T.�! ` ,_ � �_ ' ._` , � _ — _ ,'�. � ,k. �,. � �� ri� �Fl,au��:"�� 14 7' ' ��.�� i� i� • ` � ' �~� A .� �.,� �•, � w• �� — � ��iYi � 1� � i- �� .�iJ �._ 'rp I "�r ' � � ` � , �� ,_ d � 4� " I �� °� / • ! r � � � � ' � � �` _ �� a �_ . -� _ _ __ _ • ti�, � � :� �'� =.-.� •� � � ._� _ � � . _,. - -� � -_ �.ti. +� � �._ � �. � � s� , �f 1�►- �„ %' t ��i� 1 • � , tr . �� . r ' �-1� � `` `R��ia,r'�� •'�A;k �"Q- 1 . '$ . W�L+JI �r��t .� 1 lEllt'�s rJ�� 'g' I k'w�, "-^l �m��s � � i�.�. ..l� �� ___' �. J, ��,.o I , , Ex ertise p �� , � ;: ;_-� ,.��. �� a'� a.m f _ . �_ . I� _i� - - � _ ��s' �- — -- . e `, �•�•' � � , � !��' 111 � � ' � 4�,�: � � _ �� m I � ��rv�, • - ' . , . - •f. � .s i - _ '�-�--- _ _ i � - - � ==-�_ ,� �-�-` _� . i , �_ �_.� '� � � � � � , _ � � - ; - T ,� ;� ----.� — :.�� .�.a. , � �,�� '� - - _ �� _ �� _ � �� i H�-._ �., r_rarea — _ - � � r.s,r. � — �� 1 - � -.�.:,� � _ - � _ � � ��k � I F �, - r=-., '� , . � � `^ . , , Ex ertise p .� _ � � �� y of i��-�� -� ��^ � ; � - J -J L ��n./':I�e' id�:Y" � '`D.D� J IJ ��/ _ -' '�� - - �___ �� ! . _�,�I .yr� �r , - '�R! - - a.r� - I�� .��-`__ _ -�'ry� •_ , , � - ` . i .� . ' _ � -- ;_.� � ' � .,� f'�. "• ��^ - . � �� .r � 9 :�_ -- -�-_"^'-_ i ,.T�__ 'y _ _7..... I . , ' ` _ _.- � _ ...- - . .- I fri�.1�� I� � ' - - -- - - - - i � , �� ,�;_ _ - , - - � i, - - � _ -- — -- -- - — • �� , � i =� •�^ �4 - _ y p� � r \e., - — .�.w •"7,�='�' t,�. _� �� ::;�s��• •�� ' - I �,��-ii��f> � ,' S,_a -�.�� w':Sr = �� I • ` ': � _ 1�I � —`�,-� , � 1• _ _ _-'►- �a, I i I � �'3i�`�t — -- ►�� , i V , Additional Ex ertise . p . � __ _ __ . � ;,.._:, � o: —- � . . , � {� . T -- __ . �" � _ - — — � � , � �` �� '- � �` �� ; �. 1 s � �� ._. :�.Y� . � - � �rk _.--__-.__- ' . �� • � . _ __ � � � me �� _ _ _ _ � _ _ � ,: � __. :. . � -��- � � ��- _- ,, _ � , _ � , _ � .. _ i ■ _ - �' t��1f_ � � �� ,` _ � -�-"-- �� -� --- - _-. ,;.�_t.. .�,.�---- - - - . : , - . - �-- -. _ z -- -- -- - - - ---- -,� --�-�.____ - � � � _ - —__-",'"r: �p - � - -_� _ = ��;;�, -- � �� , _ � �' -_' .: ;;�/�' - ��•_ �� '� - -- __ ..., i�' � -- � -_� - `i .S -� 'I• h ' _ T- f� ;�� f `r � ',f . �, � . . - �+'C '! ;�.� :�� • - ` �- . j .` --- — ,�,1�- -�J - i �� '{ -) , •i � � e i► _ �`-� � - - — ;, 4 �. � � ,� . � � � ' �� Pro'ectA roach . . � J pp � CommunicationlCollaboration ', Core Planning Process ��, » Establish Core Planning Group i � to represent all Stakeholders » Establish guiding principles r � � and criteria for measuring :., 20 I success � I, » Develop agreement on needs , , � � � , : � I � � � �.. ,s,� \ ��, » Sets the tone for building r„ � consensus � � ' e��. o - � » Provide insight into -_� community's values . . . • � � � , , Pro'ectA roach J pp Communication/Collaboration Budget Management » Proactive approach of scope management » Life Cycle / First Cost analysis » Informed decision making _ � » Phased cost reviews » Active bid solicitation � » Staff awareness » Trend awareness » Expert awareness / �, � - i - �� Pro'ectA roach . . J pp Communication/Collaboration Schedule Management ��. _ _ _�---:�-: _-�-� » Development of a detailed project � ��-:�T�=r-==�= _ - -�� - � meeting and milestone schedule ' � _ - .� .. » Setting outcome-based decisions » Understanding critical equipment lead times �� - - -� , » Strategizing bidding and � , ,.� . � _ _-�._-� ��. � � construction times to minimize cost � � �=' , � - � � � �. � � , + �� i , '� �- -3 � , � 1 ', ;,� _ - - - . ----� _ �r __ •� Pro'ectA roach . . J pp Commu nicationlCollaboration PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE 2016 Z017 2018 � I � M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A ; Contract Award � �' � '' ' I ' Schematic Design � SD Approval �� i I� Design Oevelopment � i I U�Approval Construction oocuments CO Approval Bidding I Award � � ; Construction I Occupan�y � I � � I � I i I � , � P ro ect A roach . J pp CommunicationlCollaboration Quality/Construction `'�� ' Administration � » Detailed User Books �� s� � �,� � �, » Weekly Coordination - » M eeti n s -'� � � 9 _. » Associate Review » Long-term, Durable Materials � » Mandatory Inspections » Weekly 4n-Site Presence » Proactive Punch list » Active Close-Out , Pro'ectA roach . J pp Commu nication/Coilaboration Efficient Building Systems » Aligned to your goals � » Appropriate for your needs � � « . � � - -" .�---,, » Safe and secure � � » Eas to o erate and maintain ' � � - ' , Y p . �. � � ._ C - - �. » High quality and durable , � ;� -_� � , - � materials � ' � - � ` '--�- » Serviceable by design - � �� ' � . � __ � » Energy efficient ;,� �� ,` ; » Life cycle approach » Sustainable design � �.,_--__ � , , Pro'ectA roach J pp Energy Performance CommunicationlCollaboration Top 1 O H it List ��,�� » High efficiency boilers » Heat recovery » Lighting "off" controls » Variable speed everything YOU » DDC controls » Lighting technology » CO2 outside air control �pERATING aua�i�r �� ENVII20NMENT` » High efficiency water heater » Time of day zoning , » Occupancy sensors , � , , � � ��I � :s� ' � ' � � - � � - '�iw - .,; �._..-�� _. � " e �Ei '=+��" + �' �" 1 r � i 1 � •�.i i'i •I '��4 �.f a:.�1 , � � �� '� ��' c wf � �_�� a •� c r �: t� � � �. �� : � . � r :�, � � ' 1 . ' . � � . ' � -� J � i� " � :b"''� ., k /� �_�;� , . � � / /_ � I�� ,; � . ' � � � � i ' - . ■ • ' � . - � - - . � � � . . : . I��i��111��■■ i o�� a�� ■W:l,�!!!� �so - es�m� - o.��. � • �tAYi� fe.7�= I , • tiiCT '"a+r�a ' ��'r " . � �� o � ' -�+Y++r� I ��1 IM! li�'$ s��v .�.�fr�� R"'''�L� �r4:3 - _ - ---n� _� , - , , Desi n Ex ertise g p _ ;� . . __ ; » Efficient Response Time - __ �=�-: » Safety and Security �_____.._ �z » Adequate Training � � = - _ Spaces = % � � ��. » Full Time Housing � » ' ��. Partnering �pportunities » Weather Protection I� � � 4 t ,� �- - » Secure Perimeter =j - » Apparatus Bays » Four Fronts Site 0 ortunitiesl Challen es . . pp g � -- -_, --- ` 80th Street -�:�,::...,��.�_ , . . - - - - - y � - - --- ' �'�umm - ._ �� _ ' itor Par ng Summer � -� R�tpurpose = _ _ Admin - � � � . � i_`-, � ��QI��arking �,; r, �<_;= - - -�- lee i - _ � , - ----Retainplg�ll = La! into - w - _ + �. �� Trait Head TraininglP = � �r Level �I , Parking - - dpP . - - � ,.�-�`�,' � I� y � � ` ' - (Revise Access from � ,� } - Existing?f Sleeping Area - �_ ',I C ` _, N = ,,� - Retaining Wafl _ r I 'F.`� �' _ - _ , _� Future Treatment = �� Plant f � ' - F� E i ' , - _ „ Potential Future '�I � � Wint�r Trail ��'� , - Winter - �, � - I F '_ . i � �� ', - -..l1 • �.� 1; � i i - ' r: , �- Connect xisting � Park Trail/ �,�, ' Amenities -: _ >_-�, , �' _,_y,. ; i -= -�.� . i _ -� _ _ �, ' ,:. � . . �� 4 .� � , - - �� .� � ,. T ,� ��',:�` , ` � �`+►. ,w ' J I y�f � 'G ? a :� � . � �. �� ` I , � V•'•:� / .�� i ..��' _ ' � � Site � ortunities/ Challen es . . pp g � � _�._-_—_ -- � _ 80th Street � � �I . � me_ �"- _ Vi itor Par ing Summer � - - -z, min _ `�=` � " ` � � � leepi " - ----Retainin� i � �� ,, . � -� � Repurpose ;_� - - ; Upper Lewel `� « �, ��- ,�,' � Old Parking ,� a = _= Access from . Lot into = -, Sleeping Area � ' � . ' Trail Head � � �:�� , N � t � Retaining Wall -� , ` - _ _ ; �-¢ ' � _ �. Future Treatment � °� �� - :' ,��: � �, - � Plant ��; _ � J , ' ` � l � i ', �. �IVIO�� . 1 Winter �- _ � � I y_ ' • � , - , _ � � •. � _. ,� ` � `�`�r Connect�Existing � { � Park Trail/ ;� � _ - Amenities,:, �._ �� * �.� . . � _ - _�-;� , ��- '�' ` r � ' ; . I _ � ' �� 'Y: `i , � �� ,� �' :. -.� � _� ■ _ � .� � � r. I � 1 �� G" .e �'� � � � ' � f� � � � . T .l F � ` `t �. - �ir�1 � Y -�T i ■ , . UUh Wold . y We bring strong experience �urprocesses will insure success � Dur goal �s to achieve 1/alue and Quality while remair�ing on Time and on Budget We know Minnesota City Government We know ou and our communi y y ty �, We are driven to hel p you succeed! , This exact team has done this exact effort for you and for other munici alities successfull ! � y i , , , Your Questions � �