HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-06-20 PACKET 06.A. To: Public Services Commission
From: Joe Tschida, Engineering Intern
Jennifer Levitt, PE, Community Development Director/City Engineer
Date: June 15, 2016
Re: CSAH 22 Access Planning Discussion Hinton to Jamaica
Background
A well-planned transportation system is critical to the growth of a city. Transportation systems
require revisions as land use and other factors change. Part of these revisions is the redesign of
streets as their current design is exceeded. When redesigning a street, major concerns include
the projected average daily traffic, the access a road must provide, and the desired mobility of
the road. Based on these criteria, Cottage Grove classifies the roads in one of four ways. A
summary of these classifications can be seen in Table 1 below; additional information can be
found on pages 6-12 to 6-19 in the attached excerpt of the Future Vision 2030 Comprehensive
Plan.
Table 1
Classification Intended Use Average Daily Traffic Example
Principal Arterial Serve major active areas, longer trips
less access
15,000-200,000 US Highway 61
Minor Arterial Connect urban service area with
town, medium to short trips,
emphasis on mobility
5,0000-30,000 80th Street, Keats Avenue
(CSAH 19)
Collector Connect to minor arterials serving
more short trips. Emphasis on
mobility and access
1,000-15,000 Hadley Avenue, 95th Street,
Military Road
Local Streets Lower speed road with emphasis on
access
Less than 1,000
Higher classifications include more traffic and many times higher speeds. As a result of these
characteristics, there is a need to limit access to ensure the safety of drivers and that traffic
flows properly. The City’s guidelines are laid out on page 6-20 in the Future Vision 2030 Com-
prehensive Plan, which is attached. Based on the county classification, the preferred spacing
would be limited to every quarter mile or more.
Discussion
CSAH 22 (70th Street) from Hinton Avenue to Jamaica Avenue does not follow the City guide-
lines for access spacing with many access points too close together. This creates safety con-
cerns as well as traffic flow disruptions. Looking into the future by 2030, the average daily traffic
Public Services Commission
CSAH 22 Access Planning Discussion Hinton to Jamaica
June 15, 2016
Page 2 of 4
will exceed the current road configuration leading to a redesign of the corridor. During this rede-
sign, the City and County would also like to address the access concerns along the route.
Intersections Along Route:
Ideal Avenue/Homestead Avenue: Serves residential areas, cannot remain full access since
it is only 570 feet from Hinton Avenue. Limits the ability for longer turn lanes and the possibil-
ity of backing traffic up into the intersection.
Idsen Avenue: Serves residential areas as well as access to Highlands Park and the splash
pad.
Innsdale Avenue: Serves left turns for a large residential area to the south.
Inwood Avenue: Connects to Military Road, serves left turns for a large residential area.
Irvin Avenue: Serves left turn for a relatively small residential area.
Isleton Avenue: Serves left turns for a relatively small number of homes.
Private Driveways: There are several along route that must be considered.
With many of these intersections being within a quarter mile of each other, the type of access
allowed at each needs to be considered along with the possibility of incorporating signals or
other advanced traffic control measures into the corridor. Another consideration with the five in-
tersections from Idsen to Isleton is the elevation change of the corridor. A few of the elevation
and spacing challenges are highlighted in the following pictures:
Public Services Commission
CSAH 22 Access Planning Discussion Hinton to Jamaica
June 15, 2016
Page 3 of 4
Hi
n
t
o
n
Homestead
Private Driveways
Isleton
Park
Inwood
Irvin
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
Innsdale Idsen
Public Services Commission
CSAH 22 Access Planning Discussion Hinton to Jamaica
June 15, 2016
Page 4 of 4
Additional Information:
For continued understanding of the City’s policy for road classification and further detail on the
projected needs for the transportation system in Cottage Grove, please refer to Chapter 6 of the
Future Vision 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Washington County will also be presenting different
design alternatives for this corridor.