HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-07-26 PACKET 07.City of Cottage Grove
Planning Commission
June 28, 2021
A meeting of the Planning Commission was held at Cottage Grove City Hall, 12800 Ravine Park-
way South, Cottage Grove, Minnesota, on Monday, June 28, 2021, in the Council Chamber and
telecast on Local Government Cable Channel 16.
Call to Order
Chair Khambata called the Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
Roll Call
Members Present: Sarah Bigham, Jessica Fisher, Tony Khambata, Derek Rasmussen
Members Absent: Evan Frazier, Eric Knable, Jerrett Wright
Staff Present: Ben Boike, Community Development Director
Mike Mrosla, Senior Planner
Emily Schmitz, Senior Planner
Sam Burns, Planning Intern
Steve Dennis, Council Member
Approval of Agenda
Bigham made a motion to approve the agenda. Fisher seconded. The motion was approved
unanimously (4-to-0 vote).
Open Forum
Khambata opened the open forum. Khambata asked if anyone wished to address the Planning
Commission on any non -agenda item. No one addressed the Commission. Khambata closed the
open forum.
Chair's Explanation of the Public Hearing Process
Khambata explained the purpose of the Planning Commission, which serves in an advisory
capacity to the City Council, and that the City Council makes all final decisions. In addition, he
explained the process of conducting a public hearing and requested that any person wishing to
speak should go to the microphone and state their full name and address for the public record.
Public Hearings and Applications
6.1 Addition at 8401 River Acres Road — Cases V2021-046
Titan Property Ventures, LLC has applied for a variance to setback requirements for a pro-
posed addition to an existing principal structure at 8401 River Acres Road south that would
be closer than 100 feet from the normal high-water mark within the Mississippi River Critical
Area.
Planning Commission Minutes
June 28, 2021
Page 2 of 4
Schmitz summarized the staff report and recommended approval based on the findings of fact
and subject to the conditions stipulated in the staff report.
Rasmussen does not see any issues with the application as the addition will be meeting the
requirements following adoption of the MRCCA ordinance.
Khambata asked what the elevation of the existing house is. Schmitz responded the existing
principal structure was constructed at the 700-foot elevation, which is over the normal ordinary
high water level of 688 feet.
Khambata opened the public hearing. No one spoke. Khambata closed the public
hearing.
Fisher made a motion to approve the variance based on the findings of fact and subject
to the conditions in the staff report. Bigham seconded. Motion passed unanimously (4-
to-0 vote).
6.2 Rolling Meadows — Cases ZA2021-047 & PP2021-048
KLC of Willmar Inc. has applied for a zoning amendment to rezone approximately 17.6 acres
of land located east of the Parkview Pointe subdivision, south of the Woodbury border, and
north and west of South Washington Watershed District property from AG-1, Agricultural
Preservation, to R-3, Single Family Residential, with a PUD, Planned Unit Development; and
a preliminary plat for a residential subdivision to be called Rolling Meadows, which will
consist of 41 detached single-family homes and 3 outlots.
Mrosla summarized the staff report and recommended approval subject to the conditions stip-
ulated in the staff report.
Rasmussen asked if Outlots A and B would be maintained by the City. Mrosla responded yes
as they will be dedicated to the City. Mrosla noted that Outlot C contains the trail corridor around
the property, which will also be dedicated as park land to the City.
Khambata asked for more information on the area of Outlot A that is designated for infiltration
and what purpose does the infiltration serve for stormwater mitigation. Cory Meyer, Westwood
Professional Services, explained that the infiltration is to reduce the overall volume of storm -
water and described the process.
Fisher asked how many lots would be under the 10,000 square foot minimum lot size. Mrosla
responded only about two or three would be under that threshold; the rest are above 10,000
square feet. Fisher then asked about approvals for other PUDs before her term on the Com-
mission. Mrosla stated that Parkview Pointe, Northwick Park, and other developments in the
city have utilized the PUD for relaxed standards. He noted that the 7.5-foot side yard setback
meets the intent of the ordinance to have 15 feet between houses.
Khambata noted that exceeding the 7.5-foot setback is great but expressed concern for fire
prevention on the garage side with a 5-foot setback and asked if there are any additional build-
ing standards that need to be met. Mrosla responded that if the setback goes down to 5 feet,
Planning Commission Minutes
June 28, 2021
Page 3 of 4
there are different building techniques required for the dwelling but not the garage. For this
development, there will be at least 15 feet between the garages and the houses. Khambata
then asked if all of the properties would have the 25-foot front yard setback. Mrosla responded
that all properties will be setback 25 feet for consistency, which is the same as the Parkview
Pointe development to the west.
Fisher asked why the cul-de-sac island was removed. Mrosla responded that staff recom-
mended the removal of the island since there was no HOA so there would be no one to maintain
it.
Rasmussen asked about construction access, as it appears all traffic would be coming through
63rd Street. Mrosla responded that staff has not received any concerns or comments from the
residents of Parkview Pointe about that issue. The property is unique as the property to the
east is South Washington Watershed District property on which nothing can be done. All traffic
will have to come up 63rd Street; however, there are conditions of approval that require parking
to be on one side of the street. The applicant is anticipating about a month of grading on the
site, with the streets constructed this fall. The City does monitor and ensure that contractors
clean up the roadway.
Khambata opened the public hearing. No one spoke. Khambata closed the public
hearing.
Khambata asked when the parcel to the west develops, would the same traffic access issues
occur where a residential street would be the primary access point for development. He also
asked if there was any concern regarding premature wear and tear on that road and how that
eventual cost would be paid. Mrosla stated that the City does collect a security in case of dam-
age to the roadway, and if it does occur, the developer or builder would correct that. He also
pointed out on the map the future access points.
Rassmussen made a motion to approve the zoning amendment and preliminary plat for
Rolling Meadows subject to the conditions in the staff report. Fisher seconded.
Motion passed unanimously (4-to-0 vote).
Approval of Planning Commission Minutes of May 24, 2021
Rasmussen made a motion to approve the minutes of the May 24, 2021, Planning Com-
mission meeting. Bigham seconded. Motion passed unanimously (4-to-0 vote).
Reports
8.1 Recap of June 2021 City Council Meetings
Boike provided a summary of actions taken at the City Council meetings on June 2 and June
16, 2021.
Dennis provided information on The Beyond the Yellow Ribbon organization and stated that
the group is always looking for members. He then stated that he would answer any questions
from the Commission.
Planning Commission Minutes
June 28, 2021
Page 4 of 4
Rasmussen asked if the City will have fireworks for the 4th of July. Dennis announced that they
will be held at Kingston Park on July 4, hosted by the Lions Club along with donations from
several companies in Cottage Grove.
8.2 Response to Planning Commission Inquiries
8.3 Planning Commission Requests
Rasmussen asked for an update on the continuation of Ravine Parkway. Dennis responded
that the City is waiting for a couple parcels of land to sell and develop to finish the connection
across Jamaica Avenue. Eventually when the east side of Keats Avenue develops, Ravine
Parkway will go east and then swing south to connect to the roadway section by City Hall.
Dennis then provided information on the public outreach being done for the proposed redevel-
opment of the Cedarhurst property.
Adjournment
Fisher made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Bigham seconded. Motion passed unani-
mously (4-to-0 vote). The meeting was adjourned at 7:45 p.m.