Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022-02-28 PACKET 06.6. STAFF REPORT CASE: ZA22-009, PP22-010, SP22-011 ITEM: 6.6 PUBLIC MEETING DATE: 2/28/22 TENTATIVE COUNCIL REVIEW DATE: 3/16/22 APPLICATION APPLICANT: Pulte Homes and Lifestyle Communities REQUEST: A site plan review of a proposed low density residential neighborhood and park/open space; a zoning amendment to rezone approximately 228 acres of land from R-1, Rural Residential, to R-4, Low Density Residential, with a PUD, Planned Unit Development; and a preliminary plat to be called Mississippi Landing that will consist of a total of 372 homes, 9 out- lots, and approximately 70 acres of open space for park land, wetlands, and ponding. SITE DATA LOCATION: Former Mississippi Dunes Golf Course and properties to its west, generally located east or Grey Cloud Drive and north of the Mississippi River ZONING: R-1, Rural Residential GUIDED LAND USE: Transitional Planning Area LAND USE OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: CURRENT GUIDED NORTH: Rural Residential Medium Density Res. EAST: Rural Residential Trans. Planning Area SOUTH: Mississippi River Mississippi River WEST: Agricultural Parks/Open Space SIZE: Approximately 228 Acres DENSITY: 1.63 units per acre RECOMMENDATION Approval, subject to the conditions stipulated in this staff report. COTTAGE GROVE PLANNING DIVISION Planning Staff Contact: Emily Schmitz, Senior Planner; 651-458-2874; eschmitz@cottagegrovemn.gov Application Accepted: 12/29/2021 60-Day Review Deadline: 2/27/2022 60-Day Review Extension: 4/28/2022 City of Cottage Grove Planning Division  12800 Ravine Parkway South  Cottage Grove, MN 55016 Planning Staff Report Mississippi Landing Planning Case Nos. ZA2022-009, SP2022-011 & PP2022-010 February 28, 2022 Proposal Pulte Homes and Lifestyle Communities has submitted applications for the following: 1. A zoning amendment to rezone 228.09-acres from R1-Rural Residential to R4-Low Density Residential, with a PUD, Planned Unit Development. 2. A site plan review for a residential development consisting of single-family lots, age re- stricted units, and City park area. 3. A preliminary plat for a subdivision consisting of 312 single-family lots, 8 twin home units, and a 52-unit senior living cooperative to be called Mississippi Landing. Development Site Plan Pulte Homes and Lifestyle Communities have partnered for a development project on the former Mississippi Dunes Golf Course site, to be called Mississippi Landing. The Pulte/Lifestyle team will be offering four distinct types of housing within the Mississippi Landing development. Pulte’s single-family homes will be targeted at first time homebuyers as well as active adult homes for Planning Staff Report – Mississippi Landing Case Nos. ZA2022-009, SP2022-011, & PP2022-011 February 28, 2022 Page 2 of 33 those looking to downsize and benefit from the HOA maintenance and snow removal provided. The Lifestyle Cooperative portion of the development provides twin home units and cooperative units within the age restricted Artessa portion of the Mississippi Landings development. The Co- operative portion of the development requires a qualified applicant to be 62 years of age or older. The building and the grounds will be professionally managed by First Service Residential, which includes an onsite live-in manager. Additional amenities include a business center, wellness studio, raised garden beds, and pickleball courts. Review Schedule Application Received: December 29, 2021 Application Accepted: December 29, 2021 Planning Commission Meeting: February 28, 2022 Tentative City Council Meeting: March 16, 2022 60-Day Review Deadline: Feburary 27, 2022 60-Day Extension: April 28, 2022 Background Site Conditions The Mississippi Dunes Golf Course property (approximately 165 acres) as it is known today, is located south of 103rd Street adjacent to the Mississippi River, and was maintained as tilled field until the early 1990’s when it was mass site graded into a golf course. The course operated from the 1990’s until around 2017/2018 when the course closed permanently. The site has sat vacant since that time and eventually went into foreclosure. The property was purchased sometime in 2019 by the current property owner. Land Use Background The previous Mississippi Dunes Golf Course site was approved for golf course development in 1992 at such time the parcel(s) were guided as agricultural/rural residential. In 2011, as part of the City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan update, the golf course site was guided as “Golf Course” while the surrounding properties, aside from the DNR’s Scientific Natural Area (SNA), were guided as Transitional Planning Area. The intent of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan update guiding the Mississippi Dunes Golf Course as “Golf Course” was to differentiate land use for golf courses that have potential for future development, from areas designated for parks and open space. 2030 Land Use Map Planning Staff Report – Mississippi Landing Case Nos. ZA2022-009, SP2022-011, & PP2022-011 February 28, 2022 Page 3 of 33 In 2018, as part of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan update, the Golf Course was guided as “Tran- sitional Planning Area.” Areas guided within Transitional Planning Areas require additional plan- ning efforts to review and establish future land use designations. Given the Golf Course had been closed in 2017, there was the understanding of potential proposals for development of the site and the City wanted to be sure there were additional efforts completed and a Master Plan pro- posed to provide clear direction to future potential redevelopment of the site. 2040 Land Use Map Mississippi Dunes Master Plan The City of Cottage Gove initiated drafting of the Mississippi Dunes Master Plan in early 2021 with the hiring of the City’s consultant, ISG, to facilitate the master planning process. The Missis- sippi Dunes Master Planning process includes two components: Park Master Plan and Land Use Master Plan. The Master Plan project statement included:  Capitalize on a unique opportunity to provide additional access to the Mississippi River and water trail network,  Reserve valuable river front area as part of the redevelopment of the site to single- family and medium-density housing,  Provide programming and design to ensure enough open space is reserved for useful, high-quality recreation space and river access where housing and open space benefit each other; and  Coordinate and collaborate with adjacent landowners including the SNA and DNR. Once a draft was completed of the Master Plan, the City held an open house as well as made the draft Master Plan available in an online forum for comments to be submitted. The City adjusted the Master Plan based on feedback from the open house, online forum, and the City Council. The final Master Plan was reviewed, and approval was recommended by the Planning Commission Planning Staff Report – Mississippi Landing Case Nos. ZA2022-009, SP2022-011, & PP2022-011 February 28, 2022 Page 4 of 33 on November 8, 2021 (5-0 vote) and final approval of the Master Plan was granted by the City Council November 17, 2021 (5-to-0 vote). Mississippi Dunes Master Plan EAW State Statute requires that single-family residential developments within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) with 250 unattached units or greater prepare an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) prior to development. The purpose of the EAW is to determine if the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is necessary. The Responsible Government Unit (RGU) for environmental review is usually the unit with the greatest authority over the project. The City of Cottage Grove was determined to be the Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU). SHC, LLC was hired by the applicant to draft the EAW. The topics reviewed in an EAW include existing ground cover, land use, zoning, geology, water resources, wastewater, air quality, noise, ecolog- ical resources, hazardous materials, transportation, and traffic. Pulte Homes submitted the mandatory EAW for a proposed residential development to be called Mississippi Landing on 164 acres of land located south of 103rd Street and north of the Mississippi River. The proposed development reviewed in the EAW included 499 units, including 369 single family detached units, and 130 senior units in a multi-family building. The draft Mississippi Dunes EAW was published with the Environmental Quality Board (EQB) Monitor for a 30-day public re- view and comment period on November 23, 2021, and was distributed to relevant governmental agencies at that time and posted to the City’s website for public review. The Planning Commission Planning Staff Report – Mississippi Landing Case Nos. ZA2022-009, SP2022-011, & PP2022-011 February 28, 2022 Page 5 of 33 held the public hearing on the EAW review at their December 20, 2021, regular meeting; the applicant was in attendance. Three attendees spoke at the public hearing. The official 30-day comment period for the Former Mississippi Dunes Golf Course EAW expired on January 6, 2022. Comments received were collated by category and relevancy by the City of Cottage Grove. The City Council reviewed the comments on February 2, 2022, and from those comments received, determined the EAW nor any of the comments raised an issue that would require further review in the form of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The response to comments and the final decision have been submitted to the EQB for publication. The Developer will be required to complete a habitat assessment of the site and have indicated they are working with an ecologist who will conduct a thorough habitat assessment of the site including animal and vegetation habitat. This assessment will allow them to create a management plan to protect any identified species during the development process. This assessment will be required to be reviewed and approved by the DNR and the City. MRCCA (The Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area) The Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) was created in 1976 to protect the areas natural, cultural, and scenic resources. The City recently adopted the DNR’s updated MRCCA ordinance which provides coordinated land use and planning and zoning guidelines for develop- ment within the critical area. The ordinance is intended to protect existing bluffs, islands, flood- plains, and wetlands and to be enforced by local jurisdictions. The development property is located within two MRCCA Districts:  CA-River Neighborhood (RN): o Description. Characterized by primary residential neighborhoods that are riparian or readily visible from the river or that abut riparian parkland. The district includes parks, open space, limited commercial development, marinas, and related land uses. o Management purpose. Managed to maintain the character of the river corridor within the context of existing residential and related neighborhood development, and to protect and enhance habitat, parks and open space, public river corridor views, and scenic, natural, and historic areas. Minimizing erosion and the flow of untreated storm water into the river and enhancing habitat and shoreline vegetation are prior- ities in the district.  CA-Separated from River (SR) o Description. Characterized by its physical and visual distance from the Mississippi River. The district includes land separated from the river by distance, topography, development, or a transportation corridor. The land in this district is not readily visi- ble from the Mississippi River. o Management purpose. Provides flexibility in managing development without nega- tively affecting the key resources and features of the river corridor. Minimizing negative impacts to primary conservation areas and minimizing erosion and flow of untreated storm water into the Mississippi River are priorities in the district. The RTC Planning Staff Report – Mississippi Landing Case Nos. ZA2022-009, SP2022-011, & PP2022-011 February 28, 2022 Page 6 of 33 district must be managed in a manner that allows continued growth and redevelop- ment in historic downtowns and more intensive redevelopment in limited areas at river crossings to accommodate compact walkable development patterns and con- nections to the river. Minimizing erosion and the flow of untreated storm water into the river, providing public access to and public views of the river, and restoring natural vegetation in riparian areas and tree canopy are priorities in the district. The districts within the MRCCA ordinance require that primary conservations areas be designated as protected open space quantities meeting the following as a percentage:  A minimum of 20 percent preserved open space within the RN District o The total acreage of the subject property within the RN District is 58.75 acres. Ordi- nance requires 11.75 acres to be preserved.  A minimum of 10 percent preserved open space within the SR District o The total acreage of the subject property within the SR District is 105.85 acres. Ordinance requires 10.58 acres to be preserved.  The Developer is proposing to conserve and/or dedicate 67.27 areas of land on the subject site. This exceeds the total 36.09 acres required by the MRCCA and City Park dedication requirements. The MRCCA ordinance also requires vegetation and land alteration permits. These permits are intended to provide additional levels of protection for the delicate natural habitat within the river Planning Staff Report – Mississippi Landing Case Nos. ZA2022-009, SP2022-011, & PP2022-011 February 28, 2022 Page 7 of 33 corridor. The Developer has submitted detailed erosion, grading and landscaping plans and are in the process of review by City staff, consultants, and state agencies. In addition, the Developer is proposing to complete a habitat assessment on the site and will work with the DNR and the City for their review of the study and any mitigation efforts that are required to be completed prior to any grading or construction activity on the site. Planning Considerations Comprehensive Plan Amendment The City’s strategic planning efforts for many years was to position the community for growth, and those efforts were solidified in 2018 when the 2040 Comprehensive Plan was completed. How- ever, since the plan was completed, the City has seen significant residential development de- mands as an outcome of these planning efforts. This increased demand has required the City to reevaluate the staging areas, urban service areas, population forecast, and housing needs for the entire community. The proposed amendment incorporates the approved Mississippi Dunes Master Plan. During the planning process for the master plan, it was determined that water and sanitary sewer services could be extended to serve the proposed development. However, the subject site is located out- side the utility staging area and the 2040 Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) as depicted in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendment addresses this as shown below. In addition, the proposed amendment includes an update to the future land use map. As previ- ously mentioned, the approved Master Plan identified the land uses for the subject site. The amendment re-guides the former Mississippi Dunes Golf Course parcels from Transitional Plan- ning Area to Low-Density and Medium-Density Residential. Planning Staff Report – Mississippi Landing Case Nos. ZA2022-009, SP2022-011, & PP2022-011 February 28, 2022 Page 8 of 33 The amended 2040 Comprehensive Plan is anticipated to be on a future City Council meeting agenda. After the City Council approves the amendment, the City will then submit the amendment to the Metropolitan Council for formal review and approval. The City has worked closely with the Metropolitan Council staff to ensure compliance with their policies and forecasting. As a condition of approval, the Comprehensive Plan amendment must be approved by the Metropolitan Council prior to the issuance of a building permit. Zoning The property is currently zoned R-1, Rural Residential. The requested rezoning from R-1 to R-4, Low Density Residential, with a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlay, would be in accord- ance with the long-term growth plan for the parcel as outlined in the amended Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, and the approved Mississippi Dunes Master Plan. Low Density Residential allows for 1 to 4 units per acre density. The proposed preliminary plat and the land use map from the City’s Future Vision 2040 Comprehen- sive Plan are consistent in the following ways:  The Future Land Use Map in the Future Vision 2040 Comprehensive Plan identifies the future land use development of the applicant’s property for low density and medium density residential land uses. The developer is proposing single-family lots and age restricted units for the property, which is consistent with the City’s Future Vision 2040 Comprehensive Plan.  Trail and sidewalk connections are proposed and acceptable to the City.  The proposed preliminary plat and grading plan are consistent with the low-density and medium- density residential land use designation for this area. Planning Staff Report – Mississippi Landing Case Nos. ZA2022-009, SP2022-011, & PP2022-011 February 28, 2022 Page 9 of 33 Preliminary Plat The preliminary plat, as proposed, depicts a logical development given the performance standards of the zoning district. The plat consists of 312 low-density owner-occupied units and 60 age-re- stricted units. The gross density of the proposed Mississippi Landing development is 1.63 units per acre. The density range for the Low-Density Residential Land Use is 1 to 4 dwelling units per acre. The proposed development meets the Comprehensive Plan standards. Preliminary Plat Preliminary Plat Planning Staff Report – Mississippi Landing Case Nos. ZA2022-009, SP2022-011, & PP2022-011 February 28, 2022 Page 10 of 33 Zoning Development Standards The development performance standards of the requested zoning district classifications are detailed below. Lot Development Performance Standards Proposed Mississippi Landing Mississippi Landing Zoning (50’ single-family (60’ single-family R-4 lots) lots) Standard R-4/PUD R-4/PUD Minimum Lot Area 7,500 sf 6,300 sf 7,000 sf Minimum lot width at the 60 feet 50 feet 60 feet front setback Minimum side yard 7.5 feet 5 feet 7.5 feet setback, house Minimum side yard 5 feet 5 feet 7.5 feet setback, garage Minimum front yard 30 feet 25 feet 25 feet setback Minimum rear yard 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet setback Corner lot setback 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet Maximum Principal 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet structure height Mississippi Landing: Single-family lot widths range between 55 feet and 65 feet wide and an average lot area between 8,000 square feet and 9,200 square feet which exceeds the minimum lot area within the R-4 zoning district. The Developer has also proposed larger lot sizes along the park access road. A reduced front yard setback will allow for greater rear yard green space and will align the proposed development with recently approved developments within the community. Artessa Cooperative of Cottage Grove: The proposed twin home and multi-family unit portion of the total site plan area is proposed as mentioned on the north side of the development property. The proposed twin homes and the multi-family portion of the cooperative development meet the minimum required setbacks. The proposed setback from right-of-way is 30+ feet with a proposed side setback from the railroad tracks of 100+ feet. Given this parcel had two frontages to public right-of-way, the side corner setback of 20 feet from 103rd Street will be required. Planning Staff Report – Mississippi Landing Case Nos. ZA2022-009, SP2022-011, & PP2022-011 February 28, 2022 Page 11 of 33 Artessa Cooperative The proposed Artessa Cooperative multi-family building is proposed at an average of 46-50 feet in height. The R-4, Rural Residential Zoning District, and the MRCCA have a maximum structure height of 35 feet. Additional techniques were used, as outlined in the MRCCA Ordinance, in the placement of the multi-family building to minimize the visual impact of the building from the river. The long axis has been proposed along the river, the building is at the most northerly portion of the site away from the river, a lower pitched roof is proposed, and the proposed exterior materials including natural stone and colors of the building will blend with the natural surroundings. Park Land and Open Space A minimum of 10 percent of developable area (areas below the highwater level of ponding areas and right-of-way are deducted) shall be required for new developments to provide residents with public recreation facilities including parks and open spaces as a part of development projects per City Code Title 10-4-3. The approved Mississippi Dunes Master Plan guides the southerly portion of the site for future park and open space. The Developer will be required to dedicate the required park area within this portion of the site. The Developer is proposing to dedicate the required 10 percent park area of the net developable acres of 13.76-acres along the Mississippi River aligning with the City’s Strategic Plan initiatives Planning Staff Report – Mississippi Landing Case Nos. ZA2022-009, SP2022-011, & PP2022-011 February 28, 2022 Page 12 of 33 to provide residents more park and open space as well as the approved Mississippi Dunes Master Park Plan to provide public access to the Mississippi River: Proposed Park Dedication Area In addition to the proposed park dedication acres, the Developer is also working with the City for the City to purchase an additional 19.91-acres of park area along the Mississippi River. The City is coordinating with Washington County to acquire Legacy Funding for the additional acreage. At the Council’s October 6, 2021 meeting, the Council adopted a resolution to request funding part- nership from Washington County’s Land and Water Legacy Program for the land acquisition. Next steps include authorization of a cooperative agreement between Washington County and the City to acquire the property utilizing City, County, State, Federal and other fund. Once the agreement is in place, the County Board will review the request for appropriateness with the program. Planning Staff Report – Mississippi Landing Case Nos. ZA2022-009, SP2022-011, & PP2022-011 February 28, 2022 Page 13 of 33 Park Acres City to Purchase In addition to the proposed City owned park area, the DNR is proposing purchase of an additional 12 acres of land in the southeast corner of the site adjacent to the Mississippi River and the SNA. The DNR has indicated this area of the development site to be the area of most high significance with habitat properties similar to that of the SNA. The DNR plans to preserve the additional acres similar to that of the SNA. DNR Purchase Planning Staff Report – Mississippi Landing Case Nos. ZA2022-009, SP2022-011, & PP2022-011 February 28, 2022 Page 14 of 33 Historical Review – William Cowan House Current William Cowan House The William Cowan/Okey House located at 10301 Grey Cloud Trail has been identified as a priority site in the City’s Historic Preservation Strategy Report. The City’s report indicated the structure embodies the distinguishing characteristics of archi- tectural type or style, or elements of design, detail, materials, or craftsmanship. The house was built circa 1850s and is of Greek Revival architecture. A Finding of Significance was completed by the Cottage Grove Advisory Committee of Historical Preser- vation in 1990 and submitted to Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office. At their October 6, 2021, meeting the City Council approved the hiring of New History to assist City staff on planning cases that have a historic preservation component. New History is an ac- credited historical consulting company based in Minneapolis that works with clients throughout Minnesota and the Upper Midwest. New History completed an historical evaluation and provided a professional opinion of significance on the subject property. Research and on-site investigation suggest that the property has experienced significant altera- tions since its original construction. Most noticeably the development of the golf course and addi- tions to the house. These alterations to the property have impacted integrity and it may no longer be eligible for local or national designation. These findings were presented to City’s Advisory Committee on Historic Preservations (ACHP) at their December 2021 meeting. As part of the development application the Developer is proposing to create an outlot which would include the house and barn. Given the locations relation to the realigned 103rd Street and the proposed lift station location the structure may have to be removed. The City will work with the ACHP for documentation of the existing site prior to any activity or alteration of the site. The De- veloper will be responsible for sealing of the well and abandonment of any septic infrastructure on the site prior to deeding the parcel to the City. Transportation The County recently conducted and approved their Southwest Arterial Study for this area of the community, specifically from Highway 61 to Grey Cloud Island. The County’s goal was to review alignment options for a County arterial roadway connection from Highway 61 to their future pro- posed regional park located on Lower Grey Cloud Island. The study identified two potential align- ments of 103rd Street through the Mississippi Dunes site and determined the route aligning with the current Grey Cloud Trail to be the most appropriate. With that said, the proposed realignment of 103rd Street at Grey Cloud Trail will be required to be completed as part of this proposed development project. Right-of-way needs for 103rd Street will be coordinated with Washington County considering the future County roadway corridor, similar to the Settlers Bluff development. The development would access off the realigned 103rd Street at the north end of the development as well as Grey Cloud Trail further to the southwest. Both 103rd Street and Grey Cloud Trail north of 103rd Street are Municipal State Aid (MSA) streets and will be designed to MSA standards. The realignment of 103rd Street will also require adjustment to existing driveways for several parcels on the west side of Grey Cloud Trail. The Developer has proposed platting of additional Planning Staff Report – Mississippi Landing Case Nos. ZA2022-009, SP2022-011, & PP2022-011 February 28, 2022 Page 15 of 33 right-of-way and construction of a cul-de-sac which would support the existing two driveway ac- cesses. In addition, with the realignment of 103rd Street, a portion of the existing prescriptive roadway easement will not be needed any longer and therefore, the City will work with the adja- cent property owner on realignment of the existing driveway as well as restoration expectations of the old roadway corridor. The City has reached out to each of these impacted residents to ensure they are aware of the proposed adjustments and will work with them directly through the planning and construction process. Proposed Cul-De-Sac All internal roads within the single-family portion of the development will be public streets. Within the Artessa/Lifestyle portion of the development, the streets will be privately owned and main- tained by the proposed homeowner’s association for this project. No-parking signs will be provided on a minimum of one side of the proposed 26-foot wide private streets. The proposed cul-de-sac island within “Street E” should be proposed as an outlot that will be owned and maintained by the HOA. In addition, the proposed medians within “Street A” will be required to be owned and main- tained by the HOA. The applicant has conducted a complete traffic evaluation to estimate the trips generated by the project and to evaluate the need for transportation or roadway improvements. The study indicated all intersections will continue to operate appropriately at both build and no build conditions. By 2040, delay is increased but levels of service are still considered to be acceptable. A minimal operational impact on the surrounding roadway network and adjacent property owners is pro- posed, consistent with other developments within the City. A left turn lane is requested on 103rd Street into the proposed development. Due to the additional traffic, it is recommended that im- provements to the 103rd Street bridge approach be made with this project, including flashing Planning Staff Report – Mississippi Landing Case Nos. ZA2022-009, SP2022-011, & PP2022-011 February 28, 2022 Page 16 of 33 bridge height warning signs, flashing stop signs at the bridge, and advance warning “stop ahead” signs with flashers to alert drivers of the unusual stop condition. Street names have been designated per Washington County’s uniform street naming guide. The proposed street names have been reviewed and approved by the City’s Public Safety Department to ensure the most efficient emergency response to the area. All street names must be labeled on the final plat. Proposed Street Names Planning Staff Report – Mississippi Landing Case Nos. ZA2022-009, SP2022-011, & PP2022-011 February 28, 2022 Page 17 of 33 Parking The Artessa Cooperative will require additional parking spaces for the cooperative portion of the development. The City’s ordinance requires 2 spaces per unit for the multifamily portion of the development plus 1.5 spaces per 10 units for guest parking. The Developer is proposing a total of 111 parking spaces with a mix of underground parking and surface parking meeting the City’s minimum parking requirements. The twin home portion of the cooperative development does not require additional guest parking. Proposed Guest Parking Area Trails and Sidewalks Given the unique location of the development property and the proximity to the Mississippi River and DNR’s SNA area to the east, the Developer placed focus on providing pedestrian accessibility throughout the development area and connection to both the adjacent recreational locations and the regional trail corridor existing today along 103rd Street and Grey Cloud Trail. Sidewalk is proposed on one side of public streets within the Mississippi Landing portion of the development which also provides connections to proposed trails within the dedicated and maintained open spaces specifically on the east side of the development. Sidewalks are, however, proposed on both sides of the access street into the Artessa Cooperative. The Developer will be responsible for the construction of the trails throughout the development. These trails will connect to the SNA, Grey Cloud Trail, and future City Park trails. Planning Staff Report – Mississippi Landing Case Nos. ZA2022-009, SP2022-011, & PP2022-011 February 28, 2022 Page 18 of 33 Tree Preservation City Code Title 11-6-19 requires completion of a tree inventory (all qualifying trees) for the entire project area of a proposed development. Inventories can be completed as an individual tree in- ventory and/or large woodland tract inventory. An individual inventory provides the tree species, diameter inches, and health of each individual qualifying tree on site. A large woodland tract (con- tiguous canopy equal to 7,500 square feet or greater), can be utilized to get an average of the qualifying inches within preserved canopy areas without inventorying each individual qualifying tree. The Developer has conducted and completed an individual tree inventory throughout the entire development site. The City’s Tree Mitigation ordinance permits removal of 35 percent of the over- all qualifying inches on a residential development site. Qualifying inches removed above and beyond the permitted removal rate are required to be replaced on site or the City’s tree mitigation fee paid ($150 per qualifying inch). Total Inches existing Permitted permitted Excess Replacement qualifying removal to be Inches inches Replacement inches inches threshold removed removed removed rate required 47,022 35% 16,457 26,230 9,772 50% 4,886 The Developer is proposing the planting of trees within the outlot and ponding areas of the devel- opment. These proposed trees are above and beyond the required landscaping and therefore, count towards the required mitigation on the site. The remaining mitigation will be required to be covered with payment in lieu of planting on the site. Replacement Proposed Remaining inches replacement mitigation Mitigation Total required inches inches fee mitigation fee $150 per 4,886 421 4,465 inch $ 669,750.00 Landscaping Mississippi Landing: City Code requires landscape plantings be installed as a part of single-family development projects within the City. Required plantings include boulevard trees (one per lot, two per corner lot), and individual lot landscaping at four trees and 10 shrubs per lot. The Developer has provided a landscape plan identifying boulevard trees and lot landscaping. Adjustments may be required to ensure proposed boulevard tree locations do not interfere with utilities. Given the Developer is proposing to maintain a large number of existing trees on the site, specif- ically a large number within proposed lots, several lots will not require the total number of lot trees to be planted given the large number of existing trees preserved on the lots: Block 1, Lots 1-12, 17-19, 22-25 Block 10, Lots 1-3, 5-8, 10-16 Planning Staff Report – Mississippi Landing Case Nos. ZA2022-009, SP2022-011, & PP2022-011 February 28, 2022 Page 19 of 33 Block 11, Lots 1-4 Block 12, Lots 26-36 These areas of preserved trees will also provide an additional buffer from adjacent properties in addition to the proposed lot depth. Artessa Cooperative at Cottage Grove: The proposed cooperative portion of the site plan and development in the north corner of the site requires a separate minimum landscape calculation. The Developer’s currently proposed landscape plan meets the minimum required landscape plantings within the Artessa Cooperative. The proposed additional coniferous plantings have been credited toward the required additional 36 deciduous trees required on the site therefore, meeting the City’s minimum landscape requirements. Ordinance Requirement Required Proposed Overstory: 1 tree per 40 linear feet (site perimeter) 88 37 Coniferous: 30% of total overstory 26 56 Ornamental: 2:1 for overstory trees N/A 27 Boulevard Tree: 1 per Twin home unit 8 8 Shrubs: 1 shrub per 5 linear feet (site perimeter) 633 633 Shrubs: 5 shrubs per twin home unit 40 40 Required Landscape Calculation The Developer is proposing stormwater ponding as well as preserving the wetland areas on the east side and south side of the development. Additional landscaping is proposed within these areas and will also provide additional buffering and vegetation within the development to adjacent residential properties and the DNR’s SNA area. Landscape islands are proposed within the parking area of the Cooperative site. The proposed islands cover greater than the minimum 8 percent of parking are required to be landscaped. The site plan also provides the minimum 40 percent open/green space to be preserved within the Cooperative site. Stormwater Management Plan Storm sewer will be extended from all streets to the stormwater basins proposed throughout the development. The proposed basin areas require access points, which are to be a minimum of 20 feet wide, to allow for maintenance of the infrastructure in the future. The Developer has depicted these required pond access routes to all proposed ponding areas and will be required to dedicate the accesses as part of the outlot with which the basin resides to the City. The property owners on either side of these access routes will be required to maintain the vegetation to the centerline of the access. Outlots A and H that do not contain ponding will be required to be owned and maintained by the HOA, whereas Outlot I will be retained by the City for future use. Right-of-way along Grey Cloud Trail adjacent to Outlot H will be required to be platted. The Artessa Cooperative is proposing an onsite pond that will be privately owned and maintained by the HOA; an executed copy of the City’s standard stormwater maintenance agreement will be required. All storm infrastructure within Planning Staff Report – Mississippi Landing Case Nos. ZA2022-009, SP2022-011, & PP2022-011 February 28, 2022 Page 20 of 33 private streets or common lots within the development will be required to be maintained by the HOA A wetland delineation has been completed and a wetland buffer identified surrounding the delin- eated wetland areas which will protected and preserved as part of mass site grading. The South Washington Watershed District will act as the Local Government Unit (LGU) for administration of the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). The Developer is proposing to fill minimal areas of the wetland area to the north mainly for the construction of the access road into the development and the realignment of 103rd Street. Wetland Impacts and mitigation will be identified with the prepa- ration of a wetland replacement plan by the developer. Wetland credits will be obtained from an approved state and federal wetland bank. The preliminary stormwater management plan, dated December 22, 2021, was submitted and reviewed by the City’s engineering staff, and their comments are included in a plan review letter dated February 16, 2022. The Developer’s engineering consultant will continue to work with the City Engineer and SWWD to address stormwater requirements and provide wetland delineation documentation. Grading As with all new development projects, site grading is necessary to provide on-site stormwater detention, street and building pad elevations, and drainage swales for routing surface water runoff to appropriate storm sewer systems. Each building pad will be graded above the street elevation and at least three feet above the 100-year high-water elevation for adjacent stormwater basins. As noted on the preliminary grading, drainage, and erosion control plan, silt fence will be installed along the perimeter of the grading limits. Part of the grading requirements for the site includes construction of the required ponding for the site. These ponds will be platted in outlots that will be owned and maintained by the City. The preliminary grading plan (dated: 12/29/21) was reviewed by the City’s engineering staff, and their review comments are included in the February 16, 2022, memorandum. Additional grading review will be required upon submittal of an updated plan set. These plans are required to be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a grading permit. Utilities The installation of the on-site utilities, roads, and supporting infrastructure will be privately de- signed and constructed to meet City specifications. The Engineering memo dated February 16, 2022, addresses the connections for the project. Drainage and utility easements are required over all utility connections and infrastructure, not within City right-of-way, allowing the City access to public infrastructure. The proposed development will require a lift station given the lower elevation of the area in com- parison to the Metropolitan Council sanitary sewer interceptor which is the ultimate discharge point for the City’s sanitary sewer. The lift station will be constructed with a temporary discharge point near Hadley Avenue and 97th Street until such time that the City’s South District sanitary sewer pipe has been extended from its current stubbed location at Ideal Avenue and 105th Street. This sewer extension is reliant on construction of additional developments between Ideal Avenue and Hadley Avenue. The lift station is proposed to be constructed on Lot 1, Block 15 and will be owned and maintained by the City. Planning Staff Report – Mississippi Landing Case Nos. ZA2022-009, SP2022-011, & PP2022-011 February 28, 2022 Page 21 of 33 Proposed Lift Station Location Water main will be required to be looped through the site. Two connection points have been iden- tified south of the recently developed Settlers Bluff neighborhood for an 18-inch trunk main and 8-inch water main to be extended along 103rd Street to the development. Connection and exten- sion of both water mains will provide the necessary looping to the development for continuous service and fire flow in the event of a damaged pipe segment. Sewer and water extensions to the site will require crossings of the BNSF railway. The Developer will coordinate with BNSF to comply with required utility crossing requirements adjacent to the existing bridge Monument Signs The Developer is proposing to plat two outlots (Outlot A and Outlot I) at the 103rd Street access and Grey Cloud Trail access. These outlots will be required to be owned and maintained by the HOA and are proposed to be the location for monument signage for the development. A separate building permit will be required to be secured prior to construction of the proposed sign. Given the access at Grey Cloud Trail will be the City Park access as well, the City may need future shared signage within Outlot I. The City, at that time, will work with the HOA to include City Park Signage within their Outlot. Fencing Any fencing proposed on lots adjacent to the City park will be required to be uniformly designed with uniform color. The developer should communicate that all new property owners of Lots 1 through 18, Block 11; Lots 1 through 8 and 21 through 36, Block 12; Lot 17, Block 13; and Lot 16, Block 10 should plan for installation of fencing with uniform design and color. This shall be in- cluded in the HOA covenants. Planning Staff Report – Mississippi Landing Case Nos. ZA2022-009, SP2022-011, & PP2022-011 February 28, 2022 Page 22 of 33 Architecture Mississippi Landing: Pulte is proposing several home models within the single-family portion of the development. Each model proposes varying architectural materials, roof pitches, and eleva- tions. The same model shall not be constructed on lots next to each other, across from each other or diagonal. Artessa Cooperative: The proposed multi-family portion of the development area includes a three- story condo building with 52 total units. The proposed exterior materials for the building include Class I materials as the City has seen with other multi-family buildings. The Developer has pro- posed use of over 50 percent Class I materials on each elevation of the building. The proposed Class I materials are comprised mainly of masonry materials with a shake siding on the remaining wall space. The proposed 50 percent average per elevation does not include the glazing therefore, the total Class I materials exceeds the amount of Class I materials for recent similar projects within the community. Planning Staff Report – Mississippi Landing Case Nos. ZA2022-009, SP2022-011, & PP2022-011 February 28, 2022 Page 23 of 33 The proposed twin homes also include a mix of exterior materials including brick, stone, and shake siding. The color schematic will align with the three-story multi-family building to ensure the coop- erative community blends together and nestles into the rolling topography of the former golf course. he proposed color scheme will also use natural hues, tones, and distinct horizontal lines similar to prairie-style buildings. Both the cooperative building and the twin homes are proposed with a low profile pitched roof. Phasing The Developer is proposing construction in three phases. The first phase of the development will include dedication of the park acres adjacent to the Mississippi River as well as the coopera- tive/Lifestyle portion of the site plan development area. Planning Staff Report – Mississippi Landing Case Nos. ZA2022-009, SP2022-011, & PP2022-011 February 28, 2022 Page 24 of 33 Proposed Phasing Plan Area Charges and Development Fees Area charges and related development fees for this project will be based on the acreages shown on the final plat. These fees and charges will be accurately adjusted based on the final plat layout and be provided in the development agreement. All fees and charges will be memorialized within the development agreement. Payment to the City will be required at the time the development agreement is fully executed by the City and Developer. Homeowners Association A homeowner’s association (HOA) will be created for the Mississippi Landing development. The Developer has indicated the HOA will be responsible for the maintenance of the lawn and snow removal for each of the active adult homes. No maintenance is proposed to be provided for the single-family homes but those lots will still be included in an HOA. The HOA covenants must include private regulations regarding maintenance of common areas and HOA-owned outlots within the development including cul-de-sac islands. Department Review The proposed project was reviewed by the City’s Technical Review Committee at their January 5, 2022 meeting. The following comments were provided: Planning Staff Report – Mississippi Landing Case Nos. ZA2022-009, SP2022-011, & PP2022-011 February 28, 2022 Page 25 of 33  The City’s Fire safety team identified the need for two access points to the Artessa Coop- erative portion of the development. Given all proposed buildings are planned to be fire sprinkled, the full second access is not required but an access to within 150 feet of the building is required. The Developer has provided a trail connection to the main street which would allow for emergency equipment access to all sides of the multi-story structure on the site. Neighborhood Meeting The Developer (Pulte Homes and Lifestyle Communities) held a neighborhood meeting on Janu- ary 6, 2022. Notice of the neighborhood meeting was sent to surrounding property owners within 500 feet of the project area. The intent of the meeting was to give neighboring property owners the opportunity to listen to the Developer’s site plan proposal, ask questions and present concerns they might have to the developer in the early planning stages of the proposed project. A total of eight residents attended at the meeting. Pulte Homes and Lifestyle Communities pro- vided a presentation outlining their proposed development and opened the discussion for any questions the attendees had. Public Hearing Notices Public hearing notices were mailed to 31 property owners who are within 500 feet of the proposed subdivision and published in The St. Paul Pioneer Press on February 16, 2022. Recommendation That the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve the following appli- cations: A. A zoning amendment to rezone 228.09-acres from R1-Rural Residential to R4-Low Density Residential, with PUD, Planned Unit Development. B. A site plan review for a residential development consisting of single-family lots, age restricted units, and City park area. C. A preliminary plat for a subdivision consisting of 312 single-family lots, 8 twin home units, and a 52-unit senior living apartment to be called Mississippi Landing. Approval of the preliminary plat is subject to the following conditions: General Development 1. Prior to the issuance of a building permit the Metropolitan Council shall approve the City of Cottage Groves proposed 2040 Comprehensive Plan amendment. 2. The Developer and builders must comply with all city ordinances and policies except as may be modified by agreement of the Developer and City staff. 3. All grading, drainage, erosion control, and utilities must conform to the final plans approved by the City Engineer. Planning Staff Report – Mississippi Landing Case Nos. ZA2022-009, SP2022-011, & PP2022-011 February 28, 2022 Page 26 of 33 4. The applicant receives appropriate building permits from the City, and permits or approvals from other regulatory agencies including, but not limited to: South Washington Watershed District, Minnesota Department of Health, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, and Washington County. 5. The Developer shall incorporate into the final plat the recommendations, requirements, and evaluations noted in the Bolton & Menk memorandum dated February 16, 2022, subject to modifications that are agreed to by the developer and City Engineer. 6. The Developer shall complete a habitat study of the site. The findings shall be approved by the DNR and by the City prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 7. The Preliminary Plat approval shall be good for two calendar years after approval. Platting, Land Dedication, and Easements 8. The final plat and the City’s approval of the final plat are subject to additional conditions that will be listed in the City resolution approving the final plat and included in the develop- ment agreement. 9. The Developer must enter into an agreement with the City of Cottage Grove for the com- pletion of the public improvements required by City ordinances. Once the development agreement is completely executed and all cash deposits and payments are paid to the City, the City will release the final plat to the Developer for recording at the Washington County Recorder’s Office. 10. The final plat must be recorded with the Washington County Recorder’s Office before any building permit can be issued. 11. Lot 1, Block 15 shall be deeded to the City. A credit to the Stormwater Area Charge shall be provided for the value of the lot. Prior to the recording of a deed, the Developer shall be responsible for sealing of the existing well and abandonment of septic infrastructure on the site. 12. Lot 1, Block 14 shall be deeded to the City for stormwater purposes. A credit to the Storm- water Area Charges shall be provided for the value of the lot. 13. Outlot G shall be deeded to the City as park dedication. Prior to the deeding of the lot to the City, the existing burned structure shall be removed, disposed of appropriately, and verification of clean up shall be provided to the City. The existing single-family structure shall be removed, any wells sealed, and septic infrastructure abandoned. Verification shall be provided to the City prior to release of the plat for recording. 14. Common mailboxes meeting the approval of the local postmaster are required. 15. Right-of-way shall be platted within Outlot H adjacent to Grey Cloud Trail. Outlot H shall be owned and maintained by the HOA or the Developer will work with adjacent property owners for sale of gifting of that area. Planning Staff Report – Mississippi Landing Case Nos. ZA2022-009, SP2022-011, & PP2022-011 February 28, 2022 Page 27 of 33 Construction and Grading 16. A grading permit and financial guaranty is required prior to approval of grading activity related to the project. 17. Prior to Council review of the final plat, the Developer must submit for staff review and approval a final construction management plan that includes erosion control measures, project phasing for grading work, areas designated for preservation, a rock construction entrance, and construction-related vehicle parking. All emergency overflow swales must be identified on the grading and erosion control plan. 18. A pre-construction meeting with City staff and the contractor must be held before site work begins. The contractor will provide the City with a project schedule for the various phases of construction. 19. Erosion control devices must be installed prior to commencement of any grading activity. Erosion control shall be performed in accordance with the recommended practices of the “Minnesota Construction Site Erosion and Sediment Control Planning Handbook” and the conditions stipulated in Title 11-6-12, Erosion Control During Construction of the City’s Subdivision Ordinance. 20. Upon completing site grading, four copies of an “As-Built” survey for the site grade eleva- tions must be submitted to the City. An electronic file of the “As-Built” survey must be submitted to the City Engineer. Lot Performance Standards 21. The architectural standards of the development shall be consistent with the following: Mississippi Landing single-family homes: a. The minimum finished floor area for single-family dwellings is 1,200 square feet. b. The minimum attached garage floor area for single-family dwellings shall be 440 square feet. c. Architectural design is required on all four sides of the principal structure. d. Architectural materials must be varying on the front façade of the principal struc- ture (shakes, board and batten, brick or stone, accent siding, shutters, window boxes, etc.). e. Home styles and floorplans that meet the intent of the PUD may be offered sub- ject to administrative review and approval from City staff. Artessa Cooperative: a. A minimum of 40 percent of the total exterior material shall be comprised of Class I materials (stone, brick, glazing). b. Two parking spaces required for each unit plus, one space for each ten units for guest parking. Planning Staff Report – Mississippi Landing Case Nos. ZA2022-009, SP2022-011, & PP2022-011 February 28, 2022 Page 28 of 33 c. A 20-foot side yard setback to 103rd Street. d. A maximum height from grade level of 46 to 50 feet is permitted. 22. If fencing is installed within the project area, it must be constructed of the same design, materials, and color throughout the development. Fencing installed on Lots 1 – 18, Block 11; Lots 1 – 8 and 21 – 36, Block 12; Lot 17, Block 13; and Lot 16, Block 10. 23. The HOA shall retain ownership of the cul-de-sac island within “Street E” and shall be required to maintain the cul-de-sac island and the medians within “Street A”. 24. A maintenance and encroachment agreement for proposed retaining walls within public owned outlots (Outlot B, Outlot C) will be required. Retaining walls greater than 30” in height require fencing that should match the City’s detail. Utilities 25. The Developer is responsible for providing the necessary easements and costs associated with road and utility improvements serving the site. All drainage and utility easements, as recommended by the City Engineer, must be shown on the final plat and dedicated to the City for public purposes. 26. The water utility plan shall conform to the City’s water supply and distribution plan. 27. The sanitary sewer utility plan shall conform to the City’s sanitary sewer comprehensive plan. 28. All stormwater designs shall meet the intent of the City’s Surface Water Management Plan and the SWWD water management plan. 29. The Developer must make all necessary adjustments to the curb stops, gate valves, and metal castings to bring them flush with the topsoil (after grading). 30. The Developer is responsible for construction of a lift station proposed on Lot 1, Block 15. No permanent or temporary certificates of occupancy shall be issued until the lift station is operational. Streets 31. The street names for proposed public streets shall align with the County’s uniform street naming system and labeled on the final plat. 32. The City’s curb replacement policy must be complied with during home building. A bitumi- nous wedge shall be maintained on the street until 90 percent of the homes are constructed in any phase or in three years. Landscaping and Irrigation 33. Irrigation systems installed within City right-of-way are solely the responsibility and risk of the Developers, or individual. The City is not responsible or liable for any damage or costs related to installation, damage, or replacement of lawn irrigation systems placed in the Planning Staff Report – Mississippi Landing Case Nos. ZA2022-009, SP2022-011, & PP2022-011 February 28, 2022 Page 29 of 33 boulevard as a result of City use of or future changes in the right of way. The HOA is responsible for the maintenance of the irrigation system within the boulevard area to the back of the curb and within any outlots. An irrigation plan is required to be submitted and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 34. Mitigation of qualifying inches removed over the permitted 35 percent removal threshold is required as part of the final plat process. Replacement Proposed Remaining inches replacement mitigation Mitigation Total required inches inches fee mitigation fee $150 per 4,886 421 4,465 inch $ 669,750.00 35. All proposed tree locations on the proposed landscape plan shall be reviewed and ap- proved by the City Forester. Deciduous trees should be located a minimum of 5 feet off any utility pipe. Coniferous trees shall be located a minimum of 15 feet off any utility pipe. No trees shall be located within a storm pond high water level or within the pond access routes. Trees shall not be located so as to interfere with hydrants, street lighting, and traffic signage. 36. The City Forester will mark the location where boulevard trees must be planted and ap- prove the tree species to be planted. The final landscape plan must be reviewed, coordi- nated, and approved by the City Forester. 37. The Developer is responsible for establishing the final grades, topsoil, and seeding of all the lots, outlots, and boulevards within the subdivision. 38. Four trees and ten shrubs are required to be installed within each lot. Lots on which existing trees are being preserved, no additional rear yard trees are required on the following lots: Block 1, Lots 1-12, 17-19, 22-25 Block 10, Lots 1-3, 5-8, 10-16 Block 11, Lots 1-4 Block 12, Lots 26-36 39. The HOA will be required to maintain vegetation within all HOA owned outlots including the monument signs outlots. 40. Outlots to be deeded to the City: a. Outlot B b. Outlot C c. Outlot F d. Outlot G 41. Outlots that are not deeded to the City as stormwater basins are required to be maintained by the HOA: Planning Staff Report – Mississippi Landing Case Nos. ZA2022-009, SP2022-011, & PP2022-011 February 28, 2022 Page 30 of 33 a. Outlot A b. Outlot H: The Developer may work with adjacent property owners for ownership of the outlot. c. Outlot I Surface Water Management 42. The lowest opening ground elevations of all structures shall be a minimum of two feet above the emergency overflow elevation, and three feet above adjacent pond high water levels. 43. All emergency overflow swales must be identified on the grading and erosion control plan. Each fall while home building is occurring, emergency overflow elevations shall be sur- veyed to ensure the emergency overflows are properly graded and maintained. 44. All pond access routes shall be sodded. Lots adjacent to pond access routes including trail corridors are required to maintain to the center of these accesses. a. Lot 20, Block 4 b. Lot 1, Block 5 c. Lot 20, Block 5 d. Lot 1, Block 13 e. Lot 1, Block 12 f. Lot 18, Block 11 g. Lot 17, Block 13 Onsite Infrastructure Improvements 45. A street lighting plan must be submitted by the Developer and approved by the City Engineer. 46. The Developer must place iron monuments at all lot and block corners and at all other angle points on property lines. Iron monuments must be placed after all site and right-of- way grading has been completed in order to preserve the lot markers for future property owners. 47. The Developer is responsible for the cost and installation of public land boundary markers at the corners of private properties abutting Outlot B, C, F, and G. The boundary markers are $115 per marker and are to be picked up at the Cottage Grove Public Works facility. The boundary markers must be installed before a building permit is issued for the lot that abuts the recommended marker location. The actual number of park boundary markers will be determined once the final boundary configuration for the Outlots is determined. 48. The Developer shall contact the electric, telephone, gas, and cable companies that are authorized to provide service to the property to ascertain whether any of those utility pro- viders intend to install underground lines within the development. Planning Staff Report – Mississippi Landing Case Nos. ZA2022-009, SP2022-011, & PP2022-011 February 28, 2022 Page 31 of 33 49. The Developer is responsible for all street maintenance; upkeep and repair of curbs, boule- vards, and sod; and street sweeping until the project is complete. All streets must be main- tained free of debris and soil until the subdivision is completed. The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless from any and all claims for damages of any nature whatsoever arising out of Developer’s acts or omissions in performing the obliga- tions imposed upon Developer by this paragraph. 50. The Developer will provide to the City copies of test results, suppliers, subcontractors, etc., relating to the work to be performed by the Developer. The Developer agrees to furnish to the City a list of contractors being considered for retention by the developer for the perfor- mance of the work described in the development agreement. 51. The Developer is responsible for the control of grass and weeds in excess of eight inches on vacant lots or boulevards within their development. Failure to control grass and weeds will be considered a Developer’s default and the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City. 52. The Developer is responsible to require each builder within the development to provide a rock entrance for every house that is to be constructed in the development. This entrance is required to be installed upon initial construction of the home, but a paved driveway must be completed before the City will issue a certificate of occupancy for that property. See City Standard Plate ERO-12 for construction requirements. The water service line and shut-off valve shall not be located in the driveway. 53. The Developer will be required to conduct all major activities to construct the public improvements during the following hours of operation: Monday through Friday 7:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M. Saturday 9:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. Sunday Not Allowed This does not apply to activities that are required on a 24-hour basis such as dewatering or bi-pass pumping, etc. Any deviations from the above hours are subject to approval of the City Engineer. 54. The Developer shall weekly, or more often if required by the City Engineer, clear from the public streets and property any soil, earth, or debris resulting from construction work by the Developer or its agents or assigns. All debris, including brush, vegetation, trees, and dem- olition materials, shall be properly disposed of off-site; burying construction debris, trees, and other vegetation is prohibited. Burning of trees and structures is prohibited, except for fire training only. 55. The Developer grants the City, its agents, employees, officers, and contractors’ permission to enter the site to perform all necessary work and/or inspections during grading and the installation of public improvements by the Developer. 56. Upon completion of the work, the Developer shall provide the City with a full set of as-built plans for City records and transmitted to the City in a DWG Autocad format and pdf format. Planning Staff Report – Mississippi Landing Case Nos. ZA2022-009, SP2022-011, & PP2022-011 February 28, 2022 Page 32 of 33 Developer must also furnish the City with a pdf format of the final plat and four prints of the recorded plat. If the Developer does not provide as-builts, the City will produce them at the developer’s expense. 57. The Developer is responsible for completing the final grade on all lots and ensuring all boulevards and yards have a minimum of four inches of organic topsoil or black dirt on them. Placement of organic topsoil or black dirt, sod, and shrubs must not be transferred to homeowners. 58. Adequate dumpsters must be on site during construction of streets, utilities, and houses. When the dumpsters are full, they must be emptied immediately or replaced with an empty dumpster. The Developer is responsible to require each builder to provide an on-site dump- ster to contain all construction debris, thereby preventing it from being blown off-site. It is the responsibility of the Developer to ensure no debris blows on or off site. 59. Adequate portable toilets must be on-site at all times during construction of utilities, road- ways, and houses. At no time shall any house under construction be more than 250 feet away from any portable toilet. Toilets must be regularly emptied. 60. After the site is rough graded, but before any utility construction commences or building permits are issued, the erosion control plan shall be implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if it is determined that the methods implemented are insufficient to properly control erosion. 61. The Developer is responsible for erosion control inspection fees at the current rates. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for the costs the City incurred for such work within thirty (30) days, the City may draw down the letter of credit to pay such costs. 62. All areas disturbed by the excavation and back-filling operations shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. Time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule, or supplementary instructions received from the City, or in an emergency deter- mined at the sole discretion of the City, the City may take such action as it deems appro- priate to control erosion immediately. The City will notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer’s and the City’s rights or obligations. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any costs of the City incurred for such work within thirty (30) days, the City may draw down the letter of credit to pay such costs. 63. Dust control measures must be in place to prevent dust and erosion, including, but not limited to daily watering, silt fences, and seeding. The City Engineer may impose reason- able measures to reduce dust at the site. 64. The Developer shall comply with the 1991 Wetlands Conservation Act, as amended. 65. Temporary parking during construction shall be permitted on only one side of the street. No construction parking is permitted on 103rd Street or Grey Cloud Trail. Planning Staff Report – Mississippi Landing Case Nos. ZA2022-009, SP2022-011, & PP2022-011 February 28, 2022 Page 33 of 33 Prepared by: Emily Schmitz Senior Planner Attachments: - Mississippi Landing Preliminary Plat - Mississippi Landing Preliminary Civil Drawings 12/22/2021 - Artessa Cooperative Preliminary Civil Drawings 1/18/2022 - Artessa renderings - Engineering Review Memorandum 02/16/2022 - William Cowan House Historic Evaluation - EAW Notice of Decision MISSISSIPPI LANDING 125' 35' 25' 10' 125' 125' 35' 25' 10' 125'1 192 20 18 3 17 4 5 16 6 7 8 15 14 13 1211 22 12 21 20 13 19 1118 17 16 1 14 210 23 20 9 15 8 10 3 16 15 24 197 9 17 6 14 518 825 18 13 19 4 7 26 12 17 20 6 2111 27 16 22 5 10 15 2328 4 7 14 24 9 13 329 6 12 2 8 5 30 11 12 1 4 10 31 7 11 9 32 10 3 8 9 33 136 7 8 34 2 14 7 5 6 4 35 15 OUTLOT F 6 3 5 1 16 5 4 2 17 21 1 4 18 20 3 18 19 19 17 3 OUTLOT C 20 1 2 1822 17 218 17 E 16 "23 19 7 4 1 ' 16 4 16 2 24 1 ° 20 6 5 15 S 15 25 A TE ER TS 14 26715 21 14 13 27 12 4 28 14 8 11 13 510622 9 6 8 7 29 3 5 3013 12 9 23 314 2 32 12 11 33 34 10 24 3 3935 3837 36 11 1 10 2 25 13 11 10 B TEERTS 9 14 PREPARED FOR: 1 26 OUTLOT B 9 12 8 15 10 1127 1 78 9 23 7 6 45 8 16 28 7 07.142 E "14'63°00N 6 1 30 29 6 1 17 6 5 31 184 2 3 1 54 13 2 1 0 19 0. 8 5 3 = R F TEERTS 20 10 21 9 22 1114 15 16 13 12 23 8 4 24 5 92.062 W"14'63°00S 12/29/21 3 25 7 6 2 1 © 2021 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-PPP01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 16.663 1 W"91'93°00S 39.9131 E"74'22°00S OUTLOT D 17 16 5 6 15 7 8 9 14 10 11 13 12 36 19 18 17 35 16 14 12 13 34 15 15 33 16 11 OUTLOT E 14 32 17 13 10 31 18 9 30 19 8 29 20 7 28 21 6 527 22 26 23 N 09.9131 W"61'41°00 25 24 OUTLOT F PREPARED FOR: OUTLOT G 2 1 15 16 12/29/21 01.00 8 E"14'63°00N 02.417 E"14'63°00 N © 2021 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-PPP01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 211 21 0 04 2 A 521 16 0 5.06 5 21 216 9 521 2 66 22.66 821 011 66 2 194 16 16 05.06 05.06 05.06 05.06 1 3 3 1 2 1 16 06 6121 PREPARED FOR: 2 4 4 9 9 1 5 4 12/29/21 © 2021 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-PPP02.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 8 1.0 1 75.06 421 811 4 2 W / R 3 5 7 1 3 6 1 3 2 1 PREPARED FOR: 12/29/21 © 2021 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-PPP02.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 0 5 . 0 5 0 0 . 5 6 0 5 . 0 6 5 5 W / R 0 0 . 5 7 0 92 1 9 72 1 0 . 0 65 . 0 W 5 6 / R 0 0 . 1 0 7 6 0 5 21 5 3 31 0 0 5 5 .. 0 0 6 5 0 5 521 . 0 5 8 31 0 5 . 0 6 0 0 . 5 6 69 94 1 6 A T EE RT S 8 165 16 85 75 3 85 7 .5 05.00 66 05. 06 .06 75 56. 06 60.71 0 8 3 26 1 12 1 0 6 7 160 16 16 17 75 66 36 26 06 0 5 . 62 6 5.2 0 6 22.6605.2 05.26 05.26 PREPARED FOR: 9 6 96 66 2696 3501 B T EERTS 16 65 16 06 16146 6 5.0 0 06 35. 05.0 605.06 05.06 12/29/21 08 1. 1 7 5.06 421 811 4 2 W / R © 2021 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-PPP02.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 45 6 2 1 74.0 5 53 3 0 5 . 1 5 5 7 2 21 6 PREPARED FOR: 1 5 0 0 . 6 6 2 3 4 4 3 03 2 6 12/29/21 0 5 . 0 5 0 4 0 . 6 5 6 0 0 . 5 6 0 5 . 0 5 W / R 0 0 . 5 7 © 2021 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-PPP02.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 53 7 6 76 46 00.7 6 4 7 6 00.76 58.66 39.56 7 4 35 76 76 66 721 KLAWEDIS '5 3 F TEERTS 56 42 54 07 07 07 4 3. 0 7 00.07 00.07 00.07 0 0.07 90.38 641 5 3 85 07 27 66 311 18 PREPARED FOR: H T O L T U O 12/29/21 © 2021 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-PPP02.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 1 6 2 1 2 1 4 2 3 3 . 1 6 1 6 3 8 62 6 5 0 0 . 3 7 621 521 22 6 2 1 9 5 . 0 6 9 2 . 8 7 0 13 1 03 0 5 . 0 6 1 2 3 4 0 . 0 1 5 . 06 6 731 4 4 951 9 9 4 4 6 2 . 0 6 4 63 51 1 93 7 6 . 0 6 1 0 4 1 0 5 . 0 6 PREPARED FOR: 0 3 1 B - B B - B 12/29/21 53 76 76 46 © 2021 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-PPP02.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 05 15 75 0 6 7 1 2 6 5 2 1 25.0505.0565.05 5 5 2 .0 57 8 5.1 0 5 5 0 2 5. 0 5 1 5 3651207 3114 2 4 6 1 8 4 1 5 0 1 0. 5 1 5 556 07 00.56 0 5 5 1. 0 5 K L A W E D I S ' 5 2 3 5 PREPARED FOR: 1. 0 5 1 6 2 1 5 1 . 0 5 2 5. 4 6 63 6 2 65 1 1 5 7 4 8 8 1 12/29/21 1 5 . 2 5 4 3 © 2021 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-PPP02.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 46 PREPARED FOR: 39.56 66 07 12/29/21 00.07 27 0 13 092 © 2021 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-PPP02.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 91 4 1 5 4 6 8 4 2 244 5 2 1 5 2 1 5 2 0 0. 1 1 5 0 0 1. 00.155 5 2 1 1 5 0 1 0. 5 1 5 9 2 1 7 17 0 5 6 2 5 4 1. 0 5 4 0 0. 5 6 2 4 16 1531 16 1 5 0 0 . 0 2 6 6 5 2 1 031 83 1 1 231 0 4 341 541 051 PREPARED FOR: 45 1 051 2 7 631 1 5 21 5 9 6 . 0 5 5 3 12/29/21 9 6. 0 5 0 3 1 52 58 2 8 © 2021 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-PPP02.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 989.6 6.089 DRIVEWAY VARIES 980.0 2.989 X X X X FM FM FM S A G | | | | F S | S A G 41257 4 S 12/29/21 FFS SFS 0 0 . 0 8 0 + 065 7 05 0 0.00 1+185 95 06 A TEERTS 0+1 00.0 M F 1 E T E E R T S 9 5 678 3 B TEERTS 0 F 6 S SF SF SA G F S XOH P S A 0 G S AX G 7 X PREPARED FOR: 1 AS G 6 4 . 4 0 + 3 1 1 12/29/21 © 2021 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-GDP01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 OF 1 0030343.00 S ALL T S SHEETS H T SHEET: 0 0 1 S EVA Y ELDAH 12/29/21 PROJECT NUMBER: S T S D R 3 0 1 REVISION (NOT TO SCALE) SITE INITIAL SUBMITTAL DATE: Vicinity Map S L COTTAGE GROVE, MN I FORFOR PRELIMINARY PLAT, GRADING,UTILITIES AND LANDSCAPEMISSISSIPPI LANDING PRELIMINARY PLANS A R.......... T D U O L C Y E R G .......... DATE 1 NO. CoverOverall Grading & Erosion Control PlanOverall Grading & Erosion Control PlanOverall Preliminary Landscape PlanOverall Tree Preservation PlanTree Preservation PlanTree Preservation PlanTree Preservation PlanTree Preservation PlanTree Preservation PlanTree Preservation PlanTree Preservation PlanTree Preservation PlanTree Preservation PlanTree Preservation PlanTree Preservation DataTree Preservation DataTree Preservation DataTree Preservation DataTree Preservation DataTree Preservation DataTree Preservation DataTree Preservation Data Existing Conditions PlanExisting Conditions PlanExisting Conditions PlanExisting Conditions PlanPreliminary Plat OverallPreliminary Plat OverallPreliminary PlatPreliminary PlatPreliminary PlatPreliminary PlatPreliminary PlatPreliminary PlatPreliminary PlatPreliminary PlatPreliminary PlatPreliminary Grading & Erosion Control PlanPreliminary Grading & Erosion Control PlanPreliminary Grading & Erosion Control PlanPreliminary Grading & Erosion Control PlanPreliminary Grading & Erosion Control PlanPreliminary Grading & Erosion Control PlanPreliminary Grading & Erosion Control PlanPreliminary Grading & Erosion Control PlanPreliminary Grading & Erosion Control PlanPreliminary Utility PlanPreliminary Utility PlanPreliminary Utility PlanForcemain Connection OptionsStreet ProfilesStreet ProfilesStreet ProfilesDetailsDetailsDetailsDetailsPreliminary Landscape PlanPreliminary Landscape PlanPreliminary Landscape PlanPreliminary Landscape PlanPreliminary Landscape PlanPreliminary Landscape PlanPreliminary Planting Notes & Details Drawing Title 123456789 2131415161 1112131517192022232425262729303233343536373839404243444546474849505253545556575859606263646566 10141618 Drawing Number SHEET INDEX 0030343.00 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 PAUL HEUER RYAN M. BLUHM ---- ---- (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 CONTACT: 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670CONTACT: COTTAGE GROVE, MN PREPARED FOR:EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344PHONE: EMAIL: PREPARED BY:PROJECT NUMBER: UTILITIES AND LANDSCAPE PRELIMINARY PLAT, GRADING,MISSISSIPPI LANDING PRELIMINARY PLANS N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-CVP01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 300' 66 OF 200' 12/29/21 ) Common Ground Alliance 2 100' Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 1" = 100' 0030343.00 0' MN-234375-ANC NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NUMBER: PLAN STORM SEWERTELEPHONE UNDERGROUNDWATERMAINFIBER OPTICFENCE LINECURB & GUTTERCONCRETE SURFACEBITUMINOUS SURFACEGRAVEL SURFACEWETLANDFOUND MONUMENT (SEE LABEL)CAST IRON MONUMENT (SEE LABEL) EXISTING CONDITIONS SUBJECT to Grey Cloud Town Road.South and parallel to the North-South Quarter line of said Section 30 a distance of 922.8 feet to the point of beginning; thence Commencing at the center of said Section 30, thence Southerly along the North-South Quarter line of said Section 30 a distance ofcontinuing Northwesterly along the aforesaid line extended a distance of 312.35 feet to a point on the centerline of Grey CloudCommencing at the center of said Section 30, thence East along the East-West Quarter line a distance of 200 feet to a point; thencecontinuing South along aforesaid line extended a distance of 199.7 feet more or less to a point 200 feet North of the South line ofNortherly direction of the North-South Quarter line a distance of 52.32 feet to a point; thence North parallel to the North-SouthQuarter line a distance of 309.5 feet to a point, said point herebelow described as Point "A", thence Southeasterly by a deflection X FO STOTUG WAT Parcel 1:Range Twenty-one (21) West, Washington County, Minnesota, described as follows:ALSO - Commencing at the center of Section 30, Township 27 North, Range 21 West, thence East along the East-West Quarter line ofsaid Section 30 a distance of 200 feet to a point; thence South parallel to the North-South Quarter line of said Section 30 a distance of480 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing South along aforesaid line extended a distance of 442.8 feet to a point; thencefeet to the point of beginning.Parcel 2:ALSO a strip of land 40 feet in width, running from the above described tract Northwesterly to Grey Cloud Town Road, lying Southerlyand adjoining the following described line: beginning at the point hereinabove referred to as Point "A", thence continuing along the lastcourse of the above described tract extended Northwesterly a distance of 191.4 feet from Point "A" to a point; thence Northwesterly by aParcel 3:Section Thirty (30), Township Twenty-seven (27), Range Twenty-one (21), West of the Fourth Principal Meridian, Washington County,Minnesota, SUBJECT to Easement reserved in Warranty Deed dated August 20, 1886, recorded October 27, 1886, in Book 18 of Deeds,page 564.North, Range Twenty-one (21) West, described as follows: Commencing at Stone monument at the center of said Section 30, thenceEasterly along the East-West Quarter line, a distance of 400 feet to the point of beginning of the property to be described, thencethence Southeasterly 203.61 feet to a point that is 241.70 feet Southerly of the point of beginning; thence Northerly to the point ofbeginning.Parcel 4:Parcel 5:County, Minnesota, subject to FLOWAGE RIGHTS in favor of the United States of America in Instrument dated October 30, 1935,recorded November 1, 1935, in Book 128 of Deeds, page 295.Abstract Property (PER TITLE COMMITMENT NO. The Land referred to herein below is situated in the County of Washington, State of Minnesota, and is described as follows:The Land referred to herein below is situated in the County of Washington, State of MN, and is described as follows:Twenty-seven (27) North, Range Twenty-one (21) West, Washington County, Minnesota, and that part of the Northeast Quarter of theWesterly along the East-West Quarter line for 200 feet, thence Southerly parallel to the North-South Quarter line, a distance of 200 feet, LEGAL DESCRIPTION STEEL/WOOD POSTSIGN BOUNDARY LINERIGHT-OF-WAY LINELOT LINEEASEMENT LINESECTION LINEGAS LINEPOWER OVERHEADPOWER UNDERGROUNDSANITARY SEWER UNKNOWN MANHOLEMISCELLANEOUS METERMISCELLANEOUS PEDESTAL ) 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 MM MHGAS POHPUGSAN (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 PhoneFax MN-217363-ANC ELECTRIC BOXELECTRIC METERSTREET LIGHTPOWER POLE WITH LIGHTGUY WIREPOWER POLETELEPHONE BOXHAND HOLE/JUNCTION BOXCABLE TV BOXFIBER OPTIC PEDESTALNATURAL GAS METERNATURAL GAS VALVE EET GG to the center of the County Road as now established; thence North 30 1/2 degrees East along said center of Road 35.5 feet;thence South 59 1/2 degrees East 33 feet to the Southeasterly right-of-way line of said Road; thence North 30 1/2 degrees Eastalong said right-of-way line 150 feet to an iron stake marking the Northwest corner of the Ed Carrol Tract, this being the point ofbeginning of the tract hereby conveyed; thence South 59 1/2 degrees East along the Ed Carrol Tract 208.5 feet; thence North 30thence South 30 1/2 degrees West along said right-of-way 208.5 feet to the point of beginning.feet to the point of beginning; thence South 1 degree 08 minutes West 560 feet; thence South 81 degrees 30 minutes East 107.5feet; thence South 76 degrees 37 minutes East 261.5 feet; thence North 01 degree 08 minutes East 640 feet to the North line ofsaid South Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence West along said North line 362 feet to the point of beginning.feet; thence South 01 degree 08 minutes West 560 feet; thence South 80 degrees 30 minutes East 107.5 feet; thence South 76degrees 37 minutes East 261.5 feet, being the beginning of land to be described; thence on a continuation of said last course366.9 feet; thence South 48 degrees 42 minutes East 196.4 feet; thence South 84 degrees 15 minutes East 180.3 feet; thenceNorth 25 degrees 55 minutes West 427 feet; thence North 88 degrees 15 minutes West 494.94 feet; thence South 1 degree 08minutes West 165.2 feet more or less to the point of beginning.to the center of O'Boyle Lane as now established (formerly known as the Grey Cloud Island Road), this being the point ofbeginning of this tract to be described; thence East on said North line 312.6 feet; thence South 01 degree 08 minutes West 560feet to the fence line; thence North 81 degrees 30 minutes West along said fence 166.5 feet to the center of O'Boyle Lane; thenceNorthwesterly on the center of said Lane 562 feet to the point of beginning. (1) The right-of-way of the Burlington Northern Inc.(2) Commencing at a stone monument marking the center of said Section 30; thence North on the quarter section line 250 feet(3) Commencing at the Northwest corner of said South Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence East on the North line thereof 358(4) Commencing at the Northwest corner of said South Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence East on the North line thereof 358(5) Commencing at the Northwest corner of said South Half of Northeast Quarter; thence East on the North line thereof 45.4 feet 1/2 degrees East 208.5 feet; thence North 59 1/2 degrees West 208.5 feet to the Southeasterly right-of-way line of said Road; Southeast Quarter to the North line of said North Half of Southeast Quarter; thence East along said North line 328 feet; thenceNorth 59 degrees 30 minutes West 260 feet to an iron stake; thence North 30 degrees 30 minutes East 150 feet to an iron stake;EXCEPT the following described properties:South Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence West along said North line 362 feet to the point of beginning.minutes East 261.5 feet, being the beginning of land to be described; thence on a continuation of said last course 366.9 feet; thenceSouth 48 degrees 42 minutes East 196.4 feet; thence South 84 degrees 15 minutes East 180.3 feet; thence North 25 degrees 55minutes West 427 feet; thence North 88 degrees 15 minutes West 494.94 feet; thence South 1 degree 08 minutes West 165.2 feetmore or less to the point of beginning. Commencing at a point on the South line of the North Half of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 30 distant 200 feet East fromthe Southwest corner of said North Half of Southeast Quarter; thence North, parallel with the West line of said North Half of thethence North 50 degrees 30 minutes West, 290.3 feet to an iron stake on the East line of the present Grey Cloud Island Road;thence Northerly along said East line of said road to the North line of said South Half of Northeast Quarter.Commencing at the Northwest corner of said South Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence East on the North line thereof 358 feet tothe point of beginning; thence South 1 degree 08 minutes West 560 feet; thence South 81 degrees 30 minutes East 107.5 feet;thence South 76 degrees 37 minutes East 261.5 feet; thence North 01 degree 08 minutes East 640 feet to the North line of saidCommencing at the Northwest corner of said South Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence East on the North line thereof 358 feet;thence South 01 degree 08 minutes West 560 feet; thence South 80 degrees 30 minutes East 107.5 feet; thence South 76 degrees 37 Parcel 1:NOTE: MANY OF THE CORNERS AND MONUMENTS CONTROLLING THE LOCATION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THENORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 31 HAVE BEEN SUBMERGED IN WATER OR DESTROYED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. THEBOUNDARY LINES ON THIS SURVEY ARE CURRENTLY SHOWN AS APPROXIMATE PER WASHINGTON COUNTY SURVEY RECORDS.ADDITIONAL RESEARCH AND COORDINATION WITH THE WASHINGTON COUNTY SURVEYOR WILL BE NECESSARY TO FINALIZEAbstract PropertyParcel 2:feet of the West 400 feet thereof.Abstract PropertyParcel 3:of the West 400 feet thereof, except the right-of-way of the Burlington Northern Inc.Minnesota, lying East of the following described line:AbstractParcel 4:All that part of the South Half (S 1/2) of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/2) of Section Thirty (30), in Township Twenty-seven (27) North, ofRange Twenty-one (21) West, Washington County, Minnesota, described as follows, to-wit: Commencing at the Northwest corner ofsaid South Half of Northeast Quarter; thence East on the North line thereof 45.4 feet to the center of O'Boyle Lane as now establishedNorth line 312.6 feet; thence South 01 degree 08 minutes West 560 feet to the fence line; thence North 81 degrees 30 minutes Westalong said fence 166.5 feet to the center of O'Boyle Lane; thence Northwesterly on the center of said Lane 562 feet to the point ofbeginning.Abstract PropertyParcel 5:All that part of the South Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 30, Township 27 North, Range 21 West, describedas follows:Abstract PropertyParcel 6:All that part of the South Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 30, Township 27 North, Range 21 West, described as follows:Abstract Property (PER TITLE COMMITMENT NO. The Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 31, Township 27, Range 21, Washington County, Minnesota.THE LOCATION OF THESE LINES.The South Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 30, Township 27, Range 21, Washington County, Minnesota, except the North 600That part of the North Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 30, Township 27, Range 21, Washington County, Minnesota, lying EastThat part of the South Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 30, Township 27, Range 21, Washington County,(formerly known as the Grey Cloud Island Road), this being the point of beginning of this tract to be described; thence East on said LEGAL DESCRIPTION COTTAGE GROVE, MN SANITARY MANHOLESTORM MANHOLEBEEHIVE CATCH BASINCATCH BASINFLARED END SECTIONCATCH BASIN MANHOLEHYDRANTGATE VALVEWATER METERCURB STOP BOXWATER MANHOLE MISSISSIPPI LANDING S WW RND N M FO ETATS 3000-42-12- 720-92 :DIP LEGEND 1/4 OF SEC. 31 E. LINE OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE TWP. 27, RGE. 21 NE COR OF SEC. 31, LICENSE NO. ) L MINNESOTA TWP. 27, RGE. 21 E N N SE COR OF SECTION 30, A DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF FD. 6X6 STONE W/DIMPLE H C D U O L C Y E R G ( R E FIELD SHOTS & AERIAL V I R I P P EDGE OF WATER SHOWN BOTH PER I S S I S S I M EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 PER FEMA MAPS 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 FLOOD ZONE AE LIES 1 SOUTHWESTERLY OF THIS LINE S. LINE OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SEC. 31 L PID: 31-027-21-11-0001NO ADDRESS ASSIGNED E C R A PREPARED FOR: P N. LINE OF THE NE 1/4 OF THENE 1/4 OF SEC. 31 AERIAL EDGE OF WATER SHOWN PER EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSES OFIMPROVING NAVIGATION ON THEMISSISSIPPI RIVER IN TRACT 86 PER DOC NO. 110538 ..... 12/29/21 NE 1/4 OF SEC. 31 W. LINE OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE ..... INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: ... ### OR ### ########### S. LINE OF THE S 1/2 OF THESE 1/4 OF SEC. 30 DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-EXP.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 300' OF 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance 3 200' Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: 100' SHEET NUMBER: 1" = 100' 0030343.00 0' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION RN D NM FO ETAT S 3000- 13-12-720-92 : DIP | 60. 05 | 65.6131 | | PROJECT NUMBER: | PLAN | SE 1/4 OF SEC. 30 E. LINE OF THE S 1/2 OF THE TWP. 27, RGE. 21 NE COR OF SEC. 31, FD. 5/8 IN REBAR EXISTING CONDITIONS LS #7726 FD. 1/2 IN IRON PIPE MN DNR SURVEY MARKER TWP. 27, RGE. 21 (TYP) SE COR OF SECTION 30, FD. 6X6 STONE W/DIMPLE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF CART PATH PER AERIAL FIELD SHOTS & AERIAL 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 EDGE OF WATER SHOWN BOTH PER (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 PhoneFax PER FEMA MAPS FLOOD ZONE AE LIES SOUTHWESTERLY OF THIS LINE N. LINE OF THE NE 1/4 OF THENE 1/4 OF SEC. 31 EDGE OF WATER SHOWN BOTH PERFIELD SHOTS & AERIAL COTTAGE GROVE, MN MISSISSIPPI LANDING FLOOD ZONE X LIESNORTHEASTERLY OF THISLINE PER FEMA MAPS 2 L E C EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSES OFIMPROVING NAVIGATION ON THEMISSISSIPPI RIVER IN TRACT 86 PER DOC NO. 110538 R S. LINE OF THE N 1/2 OF THESE 1/4 OF SEC. 30 A P PID: 30-027-21-44-0001 6511 103RD STREET S.COTTAGE GROVE, MN LICENSE NO. SE 1/4 OF SEC. 30 N. LINE OF THE S 1/2 OF THE MINNESOTA DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF S. LINE OF THE S 1/2 OF THESE 1/4 OF SEC. 30 PER FEMA MAPS FLOOD ZONE AE LIES SOUTHWESTERLY OF THIS LINE (TYP) APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF CART PATH PER AERIAL EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 T I B 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 G U P G U P S A G G U P S A G G U P S A G PREPARED FOR: S A G G U P E EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSES OF IMPROVINGNAVIGATION ON THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN E TRACT 87 PER DOC NO. 110538 E E E E E E EE EE EE EE E E EE EE EE) E E L E E N N A CHARGING RETAINING WALL GOLF CARTS H C STATIONS FOR D U THE PROP LINE STAIRS STRADDLE O 80.006 L C Y E X R X X G THE SE 1/4 OF SEC. 30 ( 400 FT OF THE SW 1/4 OF E. LINE OF THE WEST X R 0 .LS #7726 E 0 0 0 V . I 2 0 0 R 4 I COTTAGE GROVE ..... FD. 1/2 IN IRON PIPE FD. PINCH TOP P TCB PROPERTIES LLC 12/29/21 P PID: 30-027-21-43-0001 X I EDGE OF WATER FLOOD ZONE X LIESNORTHEASTERLY OF THISLINE PER FEMA MAPS X X S X S I SHOWN PER AERIAL N THE SE 1/4 OF SEC. 30 10525 GREY CLOUD TRAIL SOUTH HOP S S POH O I 0 I . N. LINE OF THE SW 1/4 OF 0 . 0 M 0 T 0 0 ..... 4 4 P 200.0 E ) C P A R C E L 5 )S INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: A D X S. LINE OF THE NORTH 600 FTOF THE S 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4OF SEC. 30 E E E E M FLOOD ZONE AE LIES LINE PER FEMA MAPS ( D 0 3 0 0 0 .0 SOUTHWESTERLY OF THIS . 2 0.006 0 (0 0 0 2 2 ... ### S. LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OFTHE SE 1/4 OF SEC. 30 SE 1/4 OF SEC. 30 200 FT OF THE NW 1/4 N. LINE OF THE SOUTH P A R C E L 4 SW COR OF THE SE 1/4 OF SEC.30, TWP. 27, RGE. 21 SW COR OF THE N 1/2 OFTHE SE 1/4 OF SEC. 30 W. LINE OF THE S 1/2 OF THE OR OF THE SE 1/4 OF SEC. 30 THE SE 1/4 OF SEC. 30 EASEMENT FOR THE W. LINE OF THE SW 1/4 OF NAVIGATION ON THE 200.0 (3.2' SOUTH OFCOR)### FD. 1/2 IN OPEN 87 PER DOC NO. 110538 ########### PURPOSES OF IMPROVING MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN TRACT MICHAEL WIECHMANN PID: 30-027-21-31-0005 TOP FD. 1/2 IN OPEN PIPE FD. PINCH DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: FD 1/2 INFD. PINCH TOP OPEN PIPE N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-EXP.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING | 60. 05 9 | 0 . | 6 | 2 H O 2 P| 2 | 66 | SE 1/4 OF SEC. 30 | | E. LINE OF THE N 1/2 OF THE | H O | P |OF | | | | H | O P | |12/29/21 | Common Ground Alliance |FD. 5/8 IN REBAR 4 | FD. 6X6 STONE W/DIMPLE | H O Call 48 Hours before digging:P| 3 811 or call811.com | LS #7726 FD. 1/2 IN | IRON PIPE DATE: MN DNR SURVEY MARKER SHEET NUMBER: | L | | H E E 1/4 COR OF SEC. 31, TWP. 27, RGE. 21O | P 300' | C | | R | | A H| O P | P | | | | | H O P| 0030343.00 | 200' | | RRD R/W SHOWN PER MAPS ANDCENTERLINE OF RAILS | | X H |100' O P | | | | 1" = X POND | | H N O P | O I | T | 100' X P | E | C | H X O P| E |X | | | |PROJECT NUMBER: 0 H X PLAN .| O P 0 | 0 1| 0' | | X | H | O P | | NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION |X | | | H O P | X | | | | | H EXISTING CONDITIONS X O P | | | D | A O| R H | L O I P A| R | E | F | A T | N H | O A P S| | N R | E | H T | R H| O O P | N | N | O T | G | N I | L R| U | B 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 POND (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 PhoneFax 3 S. LINE OF THE N 1/2 OF THESE 1/4 OF SEC. 30 L E C PID: 30-027-21-14-0001 R COTTAGE GROVE, MN 10351 GREY CLOUD TRAIL S. A P SE 1/4 OF SEC. 30 N. LINE OF THE S 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SEC. 30 N. LINE OF THE N 1/2 OF THE 1 4 . 2(TYP) 8 3 1 COTTAGE GROVE, MN APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF CART PATH PER AERIAL MISSISSIPPI LANDING TANKS POSSIBLE WATER S. LINE OF THE S 1/2 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SEC. 30 3 L E C R GAS TANKS A P T I B LICENSE NO. T I B MINNESOTA G U P DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF G U P S A G G U P S A G G U P E E E E E E EE EE EE EE EE E E EE E F E E EE O N E I E Y L L E RP E O T R S P E W H FD. 1 IN IRON PIPE T U O S FD. PINCH TOPO CHARGING GOLF CARTS ) S A STATIONS FOR E M ( 26.4131 07.142 P A L L 1/4 OF SEC. 30 R AE I V T O N FT OF THE N 1/2 OF THE SE E T O P N ) E. LINE OF THE WEST 400.00X X )EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 S S AX X E) A M ( O D E E FD. LS #7726 I M )E ) ( SD D ) E T 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 A 2 1 S E E )6 6 3 L E C R A P X FD. LS #43806 A.X . D P 0 MED3 0 .LS #7726 . ( 3 0E0 00 ) M SOLID PIPE E E 0 SFD. 5/8 IN 02 0 0 (0 . 3( A 2 2 2 D 2 0 E (0 0 ..0 M 6 C 0 (04 0 0 1 0 0.0 . 0 SEC. 30 ) 0 9 4 4 0 S 2 .(X 0 A 0 THE N 1/2 OF THE SE 1/4 OF COTTAGE GROVE 1 4 E FD. 1/2 IN IRON PIPE 4 FD. PINCH TOP PID: 30-027-21-13-0007DEBRA DIRTZU 0 M E. 8 TCB PROPERTIES LLC (FT OF THE WEST 400.00 FT OF 0 X PID: 30-027-21-43-0001 0)DE X ED 0.082( W. LINE OF THE EAST 200.00 4 FD. 3/8 IN PIPEX 6 X X 0 00.002 0)SAEM(3 3.282 FD. 1/2 IN OPEN PIPE 0 E -THE SE 1/4 OF SEC. 30 10525 GREY CLOUD TRAIL SOUTH HOP F 3 L 1 POH H PO -U 08.244 10 PREPARED FOR: O)36.1. SAEM(91 N. LINE OF THE SW 1/4 OF 2 1/4 OF SEC. 30H O P -0 W 7 0 2 FT OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SE )DEED 7.9 N 91(4 0 -O200.0 E. LINE OF THE WEST 200.00 0 N 3 :N) A S D) I H ) P A)S ) D S) E E) E H A D D D D S O E 0EM )E 5 E ( 1P OF CORNER)E A) E E )ED FD. 1/2 IN IRONPIPELS #7726 M 2 ES /D 3 SEC. 30 2 L P.O.B PARCEL 1 E C R A P E( 1 S FD. LS #43806 D D A 0 0 E 0 3.AM E 0 3 0 N 5( (0 D 0 E 7.0 .TRAIL SOUTH 0 0 2EAST/WEST M 9) 0.0 (8 6 2( 4 0. M.2 . 1COTTAGE GROVE) H 2 D(0 P.O.B PARCEL 2 0 1 5(0 FD. 1/2 IN IRON PIPE.9 O.0 P E 0 10477 GREY CLOUD5 D 0 0 3 (2.6' NORTHEASTERLY TCB PROPERTIES LLC 7 0 6 ( E 7 E 2 02 2.2 PID: 30-027-21-31-00141 (E 2 D 9 QUARTER LINE OF 3 D LINE OF SEC. 30 7 0 2 6 1 . . S. LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OFTHE SE 1/4 OF SEC. 30 NORTH/SOUTH QUARTER H 0 TWP. 27, RGE. 21 7 CENTER OF SEC. 30, 200 FT OF THE NW 1/4 O 7 N. LINE OF THE SOUTH P A R C E L 4 9 THE SE 1/4 OF SEC. 30 8 PSW COR OF THE N 1/2 OFTHE SE 1/4 OF SEC. 30 4 3 ( 3 (OF THE SE 1/4 OF SEC. 30 .THE SE 1/4 OF SEC. 30 )DEED 0.065(W. LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF TOP) FD. PINCH 2 S 6 W. LINE OF THE SW 1/4 OF PID: 30-027-21-42-0004DOROTHY DIRTZU 200.0 )DEED 0 52(94.655 A 3)SAEM((3.2' SOUTH OFCOR) FD. 1/2 IN OPEN 78.433 E 58.652 M )SAE M(( 9 3 . 6)DEED 5.903( FD. PINCH TOP 6 )H ) 4 SD O )SA EM(60.503 P E A E 0 E 6 D . M (MEAS) (MEAS)4( 0 4 . 0 7 8 .MICHAEL WIECHMANN 3 3 3) 2 FD 1.5 IN PIPE 1 3 (D PID: 30-027-21-31-0005 ) 1 E TOP FD. 1 INIRON PIPE S FD. 1/2 IN E OPEN PIPE 28.20 A 33.00 D P A R C E L 1 E 4 P A R C E L 1 POINT "A".M ( FD. PINCH 6 H 1 6 FD 1/2 INFD. PINCH TOP W 9 O 4 /POPEN PIPE 1 6 R)(. (N 30 1/2 E 35.5 DEED) S 6 FD. 1 IN ROD A E 6 8 M ( 6 1 . )8 D E 0 X E S D A 2 0 FD. 1/2 IN OPEN PIPE . G 4 4 2 H ( 0 O 8 .P 0 . 3 0 0 H 4 1..... O P P.O.B. PARCEL 1 PID: 30-027-21-31-0007DENNIS & MARILYN WITZEL 5 12/29/21 0 3 3 . X. 9 2 7 FD. 1/2 IN OPEN PIPE 1 2 3 S 4 A 5 G . 4 3 DILAPIDATEDFENCE 1 H ..... H O O P P X 0 . 0 4 INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: S A FD. 1/4 IN OPEN PIPE G 0 3 . 2 6 1 AS TRAVELED &PID:30-027-21-31-0002KYLE & ELIZABETHSCHRENKLER FD. 1/2 IN OPEN PIPE 1 ) MONUMENTATION FENCE S ... )A S E A D H ROAD) R/W SHOWN PER HALFGO E M P E(### L D 3 5 E . 1 SECTION MAPS, CENTERLINE . 0 OR 0 0 9 C 4 (0 4 . 4 ### R 1 S 1########### A H A 4 G O TRAIL SOUTH AS TRAVELED P CENTERLINE OF GREY CLOUD P (F.K.A. GREY CLOUD TOWN FD PINCH TOP CENTERLINE OF GREY CLOUD PID: 30-027-21-31-0008IVAN HERNANDEZ & ROSA MEJIA TRAIL SOUTH PER DESCRIPTIONS 6 60 . 0 W S 4 / A R G DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-EXP.DWG BOLT W/NUT FD. THREADED MISSISSIPPI LANDING RND NM FO ETATS 3000-13-12- 720-92 :DIP X X X X 7 X 2.6131 X 66 9 0 . O F 6 H 2 O OF P 2 NE 1/4 OF SEC. 30 2 E. LINE OF THE S 1/2 OF THE 12/29/21 FD. 5/8 IN REBAR Common Ground Alliance 5 H O O Call 48 Hours before digging:F P 811 or call811.com S A MN DNR SURVEY MARKER DATE: SEC. 30, TWP. 27, RGE. 21 G SHEET NUMBER: FD. 6X6 STONE W/DIMPLE 300' H NE COR OF THE S 1/2 OF THE NE 1/4 OF O O FD. CAPPED 5/8 IN REBAR; UN-READABLE F P E 1/4 COR OF SEC. 31, TWP. 27, RGE. 21 S A G 0030343.00 200' H 100' O O F P S A G W/R 1" = 66 100' H POND O O F P S A BIT G PROJECT NUMBER: PLAN 0' H O FO 0 H P. O P 0 S 0 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION A 1| G | | | PID: 30-027-21-14-0001COTTAGE GROVE, MN H 10351 GREY CLOUD TRAIL S.| O P | | |X | EXISTING CONDITIONS | | H FO POHO P| S X | A G| | | | H X O P | | | D | A O| H R H O L| O O I P F ALAN SANDKAMP PID: 30-027-21-11-0001 P| A S R | A E | F G | A T | N H | O A P S| | N R | E | H T | R H | HO O P O | O N F P | N S | O A T | G G | N I H| L O P R| U | B | | | | H O P | H O O|12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 F P | S | A G| | H O | P | | RRD R/W SHOWN PER MAPS ANDCENTERLINE OF RAILS | | | H POND O| P H| (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 ) O| FO 1 P ( | S A| N G | O H |I O P T | P | E | PhoneFax C | X | E | H H | HO T P O | O F P U| S 0 A.| 0 O G 0 | 1 S | | T H | O P E | E | R | T | H O S O | F P S| H AO P D| G | R 3| N. LINE OF THE S 1/2 OF THENE 1/4 OF SEC. 30 0| 1 | H| O P | H| O O F | P S | A G | | 0 H 9 | 0 . O P 60 . | 0 0 9 0 | 1 = 9 3 L . |1 8 = |9 H R O 8 O F X P| = S H A| H C G N. LINE OF THE N 1/2 OF THESE 1/4 OF SEC. 30 O | P | 1 4 | . X COTTAGE GROVE, MN |2(TYP) 8 | 3 | 1 H H O O O| F P P | MISSISSIPPI LANDING | | | |APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF CART PATH PER AERIAL H O | P | S. LINE OF THE S 1/2 OF THE HNE 1/4 OF SEC. 30 O O | F P PID: 30-027-21-12-0001BAILEY NURSERIES, INC| 3 POND | ) S | H O PA L E | 36 (TYP) M H( E O | P C | LL |R EE FO | A CC | P R R | |AA EXCEPTION (4) APPROXIMATE LOCATION PID: 30-027-21-13-0001NO ADDRESS ASSIGNED 5 OF CART PATH PER AERIAL PP 8 . 4 ) 4 S O 1 A F E LICENSE NO. M ( PID: 30-027-21-14-0001COTTAGE GROVE, MN 10351 GREY CLOUD TRAIL S. S A G MINNESOTA O F X DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF FD. 1/2 IN IRON PIPE(2.2' SOUTHWEST OF CORNER) S A X G 75.661 )SAE OM( F POND X X S 66 A G R/W O F BIT X X 5 S 3 A 2 . G 2 L 6 3 E FO X C R POND F E O N I Y L L RP EXCEPTION (3)E A O T PID: 30-027-21-13-00046511 103RD STREET S.COTTAGE GROVE, MN R S P E W S P H B FD. 1 IN IRON PIPE T A - U B G O S CORNER)FD. PINCH TOPO FD. 1/2 IN IRONPIPE(1.7' SOUTH OF X ) S FO A E 0 M 5( . 7 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 0 1 FD. 5/8 IN REBAR )07.142 D E P E A D )SAEM( L E L R S AE X2 /I V A1 T O N 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 0 G3 E T N ( O P N ) FD. 1/2 IRON PIPE(DISTURBED) ) S S OA E) F A M ( O D E )) ) E SSD 3 FD. LS #7726 I M AE)E A) 0 ( EE E 8 0 SD 7.D D 6 M 0) M 9 1(T -EA 2 (=5 .1 4 H)S 3 C E 8 E PID: 30-027-21-12-0002TYLER BIRON & HEIDI BOWEN )6 6 1E X 0 1 A. H 1 2-. I D 2 P N 1 1 MED3 ( O.K 2( E 2A 3 0 IS 0E0 P 2.- 0) . 8 2 M DN E S L 4 5/7 SFD. 5/8 INSOLID PIPE 0 E 2 0 3 ( 7 =E 3( 1 2 A 1 R A N 2 D 2 0&Z E 40(0 9 G 3.- E. 9 9 5 O D M 6 C 12 0 0 I( =B 0 L O 3 1 0 N V 0 I. )(:O 0 ) C A 9 4 SCENTERLINE OFO'BOYLE LANE ASTRAVELED & ASMONUMENTED (FKAGREY CLOUD ISLANDROAD)D 0 D S 2 .(X T I FO D A SAGA 0 P E) E 1 P 4 R H PREPARED FOR: O PID: 30-027-21-13-0007DEBRA DIRTZU D PM E MX 8 ( (E E H SO AP EG XS A XG D A C H 9 O 6 P EXCEPTION (5) 6 6H 0 PID: 30-027-21-13-0002COTTAGE GROVE, MN O ..10301 GREY CLOUD TRAIL S.X P X 00.002 P S 0 A 1 2G 0 DOC NO. 245995 X 1X E E - 01 F 3 3 03( X L . 1 H SO 0-U 8 P 5 .1 AHX 8 E. R/W LINE OF GREY CLOUDISLAND ROAD AS TRAVELED &MONUMENTED 5O S 02 GOA 2 3 G- H W P 7 O P 2 N 0 DRIVEWAY EASEMENT PER H O- P O 0 N S 3 A G :N) 7 FD. 1 IN IRON PIPE X H BA S D CENTERLINE OF O'BOYLE LANE AS TRAVELED (FKAGREY CLOUD ISLAND ROAD) 9 T I - )H H.P A ) O B U D S PE E HE 3 O D OD S AP S G0EM 5 3( 1 L OF CORNER)E I)E ) SFD. 1/2 IN IRONPIPELS #7726 2 A A/D 3 SEC. 30 H ASE1 S FD. LS #43806 GO P R M (0 0 30.A T 0 N (0 0 E 7 . D 2 9 EAST/WEST) 0 ( 4 U M 1 H 2 D(0 H FD. 1/2 IN IRON PIPE. O O O P P E L 0 (2.6' NORTHEASTERLY E C 0 2 )3 D Y 7 QUARTER LINE OF . DFD. 5/8 IN IRON PIPE E 8 NE 1/4 OF SEC. 30 6 0 9 W TRAVELED & THE NE 1/4 OF SEC. 30E R NW COR OF THE N 1/2 OF 6 W 6/ E 1 G /. 6R NORTH/SOUTH QUARTER W. LINE OF THE S 1/2 OF THE D 1 R CENTERLINE ASMONUMENTEDTWP. 27, RGE. 21 7 SECTION MAPS,CENTER OF SEC. 30, 3 9 . 4 8 . 6 3 5 3 ( . 4 4)DEED 0.06 TOP 5( (FD. PINCH 2 6 PID: 30-027-21-42-0004DOROTHY DIRTZU )DEED 0 8 52( 6.2131 3)SAEM( R/W SHOWN PER HALF 58.6 52 )S AEM( 0 6 . (MEAS) (MEAS) 4 0 3 2 FD. 1 INIRON PIPE 28.20 33.00 P A R C E L 1 (S 59 1/2 E 33 DEED)6 6 W / R (N 30 1/2 E 35.5 DEED) FD. 1 IN ROD ..... 12/29/21 S A G 0 8 . 3 0 1 ..... S 4 A 5 G INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: . 4 3 1 ... ### AS TRAVELED & OR MONUMENTATION ### R/W SHOWN PER HALF ########### SECTION MAPS, CENTERLINE TRAIL SOUTH AS TRAVELED CENTERLINE OF GREY CLOUD (F.K.A. GREY CLOUD TOWN CENTERLINE OF GREY CLOUD TRAIL SOUTH PER DESCRIPTIONS DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-EXP.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 450' AREA 0.03 AC2.60 AC0.73 AC0.03 AC 1.89 AC GROSS 18.58 AC12.42 AC19.91 AC13.76 AC OF 7.70 AC 12.42 AC19.91 AC13.76 AC16.16 AC69.95 AC 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance 6 300' CITYCITYCITYCITYCITYCITY Call 48 Hours before digging:R-1 RURAL RESIDENTIALPUD228.09 AC4.22 AC7.70 AC62.27 AC12.42 AC19.91 AC121.57 AC13.76 AC (11% OF NET SITE)69.95 AC (SEE TABLE)103 LOTS209 LOTS8 UNITS52 UNITSHOAHOA 372 HOMES 811 or call811.com MN DNR DATE: 150'SHEET NUMBER: OWNERSHIP 1" = 150' 0030343.00 USE PONDING CITY PARK OPEN SPACEOPEN SPACEOPEN SPACE 0' MONUMENT SIGNMONUMENT SIGN WETLAND / OPEN SPACE WETLAND / OPEN SPACE / POND NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I ABCEFG DH MISSISSIPPI RIVER (EDGE OF WATER):CITY PURCHASE AREA (OUTLOT E): 50' ACTIVE ADULT HOMES:60' SINGLE FAMILY:SENIOR TWINHOMES:SENIOR APARTMENTS: TOTAL: OUTLOT E (COUNTY PURCHASE):OUTLOT G (CITY PARK): OUTLOT D (DNR PURCHASE):PONDING & OTHER (OUTLOTS A,B,C,F,H,I (LESS WETLANDS)): OUTLOT WETLANDS TO REMAIN: OUTLOT TABLE OPEN SPACE TABLE. TOTAL HOMES: EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: GROSS SITE AREA: NET SITE AREA: PARK DEDICATION (OUTLOT I): PROJECT OPEN SPACE:DEVELOPMENT SUMMARYPROJECT DENSITY: MAJOR R.O.W.: WETLANDS TO REMAIN: DNR PURCHASE AREA (OUTLOT D): GROSS: NET: SEE EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR PROPERTY DESCRIPTION.SITE DEVELOPMENT DATA PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PROJECT NUMBER: OVERALL TIP-OUT CURB AND GUTTER PROPERTY LINELOT LINESETBACK LINEEASEMENT LINECURB AND GUTTERPOND NORMAL WATER LEVELRETAINING WALL SF SF PRELIMINARY PLAT 25'20'35' 125' SETBACK FRONT BUILDING' SINGLE 7,5529,212 FAMILY 60 60' @ FRT SBK SIDE SETBACK LOT LINE7.5'/7.5'; 15' TOTAL LOT NUMBERLOT AREA BUILDING SETBACK LINE5' ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY REAR BUILDING SETBACK BACK OF CURB TO BACK OF CURB 125' SF SF 5' 35' 25'20'35' 125' PROPOSED 25' ' ACTIVE 6,3128,025 ADULT 50 50' @ FRT SBK TYPICAL LOTDIMENSION 5'/5'; 10' TOTAL 21 50'50' X,XXX SF 10' 5' 125' EXISTING STANDARD ALL LOT DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST FOOT.ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT.STREET NAMES ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY.STREET WIDTHS ARE SHOWN FROM FRONTSIDE INTERIOR LOTSIDE CORNER LOTREARDRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED. 5' 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 MINIMUM LOT AREAAVERAGE LOT AREAMINIMUM LOT WIDTHMINIMUM LOT DEPTHSETBACKS DRAINAGE & 2.4. 1.3.5.SITE LEGEND LOT STANDARDSDEVELOPMENT NOTES UTILITY EASEMENT TYPICAL 50' ACTIVE ADULT HOMES (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 | | | | PhoneFax | | | | | | | | | | | | SIDE SETBACK | | LOT AREA| ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY LOT NUMBER FRONT BUILDINGSETBACK 7.5' | LOT LINE BUILDINGSETBACK LINE REAR BUILDINGSETBACK | | 125' | | |POND | | | 5'| | | | 35' 25' | | TYPICAL LOT DIMENSION | | | | 60'60' | 21| POND | X,XXX SF| | | 10'| | 5' | | | | |13 125'1 192 |20 WETLAND 18 3 | 17 |4 | 5 16 POND | 6 COTTAGE GROVE, MN | 7 | 8 7.5' | C15 5 | DRAINAGE & T |C T E |O E R T S L | 14 MISSISSIPPI LANDING T | UTILITY EASEMENT TYPICAL 60' SINGLE FAMILY U | | O13 | | 1211 22 | 12 | 21 POND | 20 13 | 19 | 1118 | 17 C | |16 1 T 14 210 | E 5 E | 23 R |20 9 T |S 15 | 6 | 8 10 3 | 16 |15 A | 24 197 |T 9 E | 17 E |6 R | 14 T | WETLAND 4 S 518 |825 | 18 7 D 13 | 19 |4 T 7 | E 26 E |12 17 20 R | T | S 6 LICENSE NO. 2111 | 27 16 | |22 5 | 10 |15 2328 MINNESOTA 4 |7 14 | 24 9 | 13 6 329 6 | | 12 2 8 |0 5 C 0 30 . 11 0 | 0 T 0 9 E 9.12 |E 1 16 DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF R 0 4 10 = T 9 |31 R S =7 11 L |9 | 32 12 10 3 8 | G 9 | 33 136 T 7 | 8 E 3 E | 34 2 R 14 7 |WETLAND 5 T 6 S | A 4 35 7 15 OUTLOT F 6 T | E E 3 |R 5 T 1 16 S 5 | 4 D 2 | 17 |21 T E B ET | 1 E 4 E 18 RR T S |T 20 3 S |C 18 19 4 19 | 17 T 3 OUTLOT C EPOND | 3 2 E 20 1 2 1822 | R 17 T 218 | S 17 16 23 | 19 WETLAND 1 5 16 8 16 16 .24 1 4 20 4 1 15 15 25 A TE ER TS 14 26715 29 21 14 13 27 B 12 T 4 E 28 E 14 R 11 8 T 11 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 13 S 510622 B 9 6 8 7 29 T 3 E 5 3013 2 E 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 12 WETLAND R 9 23 T 314 S 2 2 32 12 11 33 8 34 A 10 24 3 3935 3837 36 T E 11 1 10 E E R 2 G T 25 13 T S E 11 T E 10 E B TEERTS 9 R E T R S 14 PREPARED FOR: 1 T 26 OUTLOT B S 9 0 12 0 . 0 8 0 + 15 0 4 6 D 10 A 9 WETLAND.1127 T E 0 T1 7 E 78 9 R 6 23 T O 2 7 S 6 45 8 L 1 T 16 U 1 4 O 3 28 . 14 7 9 5 6 1 2 1 30 29 6 1 17 9 6 4 7 11 . 9 5 4 1 31 184 2 2 3 1 6 54 13 7 1 8 . 9 .2 2 41 3 . 9 9 18 = L 1 0 19 0. 8 5 3 = R 3 9 .9 F TEERTS 2 6 6= L F 0 20 T 15.0 5 E 2 E 3 =R R T S 10 21 7 9 9 . 4 3 22 6 3 1114 15 E 16 3 7 13 . 8 T 9 12 E E R 5 23 T 6S 8 1 10 4 6 6 24 5 ..... F 12/29/21 T 3 E 25 E 7 R 10 2 T 6 3 . S 2 . 2 5 S L I A ..... R T 0 8 . 3 1 0 1 INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: D U OI L 4 T 5 C . O 4 L Y 3 ET 1 RU GO ... 0 3 . ### 6 1 1 OR H ### T ########### O L T U O 0 1 . 1 4 DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-PPP01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 OF 450' 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance 7 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 300' 150' 1" = 0030343.00 150' 0' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NUMBER: OVERALL PRELIMINARY PLAT 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 PhoneFax 540,986 sf OUTLOT D R E C T V O LI T U R O COTTAGE GROVE, MN 17 EDGE OF WATER PER AERIAL POND 16 5 I 6 15 P 7 MISSISSIPPI LANDING P 8 I 13 9 S S 14 I 10 C T 11 E S E 13 R 12 T S S I M C T E E R T S 36 19 18 17 G 35 16 14 T E 12 E 13 R 34 T S 15 15 33 I 867,202 sf 16 11 T OUTLOT E 14 E 32 E 12 17 R T 13 SLICENSE NO. 10 31 18 9 30 MINNESOTA 19 8 12 29 20 7 28 21 DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF 6 527 22 26 12 23 POND 25 24 OUTLOT F POND EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 11 PREPARED FOR: 599,168 sf R OUTLOT G E V I R EDGE OF WATER PER AERIAL I P 2 1 P I S S I S S I M EDGE OF WATER PER AERIAL 15 16 ..... 12/29/21 ..... INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: ... ### OR ### ########### DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-PPP01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 OF 150' 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance 8 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 100' 1" = 50 0030343.00 50' 0' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NUMBER: PRELIMINARY PLAT | | | | 211 | | | 3 9 | | | | | | | 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 | | | | | | | (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 | | | | | 3 PhoneFax 9 | 1 | | | | | | | | 1 | 324,878 sf | 8' TRAIL | | | | | | 4 5 | | 16 3 8 21 0 04 2 0 9 0W / 6 R B 0 - 3 B COTTAGE GROVE, MN A TE ER TS 8 2 521 2 MISSISSIPPI LANDING 616 3 0 5.06 0 3 0 . 7 3 4 3 7 17 0 2 9,119 sf 5 21 5 K 7,978 sf L A W E D I 0 0 0 S. 6 0 ' 3 0 6 5 6 7,496 sf 2 0 3 4 B 2 216 2 9 521 2 T 2 LICENSE NO. 66 E E R T MINNESOTA S 0 0 0 . 6 0 2 W 6 0 / 6 R 7,573 sf 0 8 22.66 8 3 2 821 DATE: 11I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF 11 22 39 0 8 K 1 8,749 sf L W / A R 7 W 5 E D I 5 S 7 ' . 2 1 5 3 7 7 9,566 sf A T E E B -2 R B 3 0 T 011 66 2 S 5 6 B - B 0 2 B 0W0 - / 113,238 sf 63 B R 0 5 OUTLOT B 8 OUTLOT A 6 53 5 3 6 2 1,246 sf194 16 16 4 4 05.06 05.06 05.06 05.06 9 0 2 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 1 1 0 0 3 33 8,429 sf3 1 23 211 1 7,868 sf 7,865 sf 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 4 7,995 sf 0 3B - B 16 1 06 61210 1 0 5 31,885 sf 2 7 4 PREPARED FOR: 0 8 45 W 1 3/ 14 1 1 R 2 4 4 7 9 0 4 1 8 0 3 W / R 6 6 0 1 1 9 9 1 7 0 5 1 14 3 B - B 0 3 5 4 1 8 1 57,142 sf 15 ..... 12/29/21 3 0 1 1 0 4 ..... INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: 9 4 1 ... 0 7 ### 3 6 OR ### 6 3 ########### DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-PPP02.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 OF 150' 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance 9 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 100' 1" = 50 0030343.00 ### 0' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NUMBER: PRELIMINARY PLAT 2 0 2 1 0 . 1 6 10 15,319 sf 4 3 1 6 7 87 D 5 2 T 1 E 7 E 8 9 1.0 R 1 T S 511,847 sf 13,426 sf 42 6 4 1 5 5 8 1 7,995 sf 9,786 sf 11,777 sf 12,702 sf 7 16 8 8,493 sf 0 71 0 2 75.06 12 4 . 2 1 8 1 6 0 2 0 5 18 12 2 7 2 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 1 421 811 0 1 0 0 5 2 7 5 .4 1 0 1 4 0 6 . 3 5 7 17 8,642 sf (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 0 9 6 1 4 1 73 1 0 1 4 5 1 2 PhoneFax 82 0 5 9 5 6.0 3 1 6 B - B 4 4 8 8 3 4 1 2 18 0 6 10,307 sf W / R 7 1 4 4 1 74 8 1 0 5 . 1 6 3 1 19 13,753 sf 8 1 3 6 0 5 9 . 7 1 1 6 6 1 0 6 3 20 10,214 sf 1 3 7 5 1 6 5 0 0 . 7 6 3 7 COTTAGE GROVE, MN 21 10,707 sf MISSISSIPPI LANDING 8 9 7 1 1 14,453 sf 4 9 7 9 1 22 0 0 . 9 6 K L A W E 14,553 sf D 9 I 2 S 1 9 ' 6 5 23 0 7 5 7 1 5 1 . 9 6 4 9,544 sf 1 5 6 LICENSE NO. 1 24 8 5 7 11,668 sf MINNESOTA 0 1 3 56 0 1 8 0 . 3 91 . 60 7 W / 9 R 5 0 6 DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF 25 10,717 sf 3 1 12,809 sf 0 . 5 F 6 9 4 T E 0 0 0 .3 0 E .0 6 3 07 21 1 8 R T 4 8 S 1 9 B - B 0 3 0 9 W 4 2 /7 6 2 R 11,453 sf 0 0 . 4 0 6 7 1 4 0 1 1,126 sf 1 4 7 9 5 12,773 sf SIGN .EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 MONUMENT 1 5 S 8 3 1 L I OUTLOT I A 9 R 9 T 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 D U O L C Y E R G PREPARED FOR: 6 1 1 3 9 ..... 12/29/21 ..... INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: ... ### OR ### ########### DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-PPP02.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 OF 150' 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance Call 48 Hours before digging:10 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 100' 1" = 50 0030343.00 ### 0' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NUMBER: PRELIMINARY PLAT 0 5 36 1 24 8,633 sf 2 9 3 5 0 5 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 . 1 0 5 13 5 6,565 sf 0 3 0 1 4 0 . 6 5 6 0 9 0 5 0 5 . 0 0 0 5 12 50 .5 6,565 sf 5 0 0 6 7 1 55 3 3 1 4 9 1 5 1 (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 1 1 5 11 0 5 .0 1 0 5 3 5 0 6,565 sf B 3 0 - 0 5 . 3 B 0 5 1 12 8,808 sf 0 5 C PhoneFax 1 1 6 5 22 T 2 1 1 E 5 10 0 5 .E 9,943 sf 0 6 5 R 56,565 sf 0 T 0 5 . 3 S 0 5 1 11 0 W 56,363 sf /0 3 0 0 4 8 6 1 R 67 5 6 W 2 9 / 9 1 7 R 0 6 5 . 0 5 6,565 sf 0 0 B 5 . 3 -0 5 1 0B 10 3 1 5 6,363 sf 6 0 7 0 . 0 5 6 5 7 2 1 0 8 5 . 0 0 5 5 6,844 sf 0 5 1 0. 5 0 6 3 5 8 9 1 0 56,363 sf K L A 13 1 6 59,956 sf W 2 E 1 D 2 I 5 .S 0' 5 5 7 6 0 2 5 .0 01 0 5 5 6 7,746 sf 8 0 56,363 sf 9 63 3 70 6 3 2 1 1 9 14 8 .0 0 1 0 7,623 sf 5 5 6 . 0 8 7 5 6 1 6 2 1 1 56,363 sf 4 6 4 2 6 1 0 7,746 sf 5 . 0 0 5 6 0 15 5 . 0 5 7,623 sf 9 6 8 1 .6 056,363 sf 3 0 2 1 1 5 61 0 6 6 2 0 1 A 5 4 4 T 2 6 0 7 5 E 7. 0 E 6 R 5 T 4 COTTAGE GROVE, MN S 4 16 6,363 sf 7,623 sf 6 0 6 0 2. 5 2 3 11 11 6 7 16 5 7,708 sf 9 8 . 0 0 4 55 . 1 4 0 6 MISSISSIPPI LANDING 6 8,979 sf 4 92 1 17 7,623 sf 6 21 2 1 0 61 0 51 5 .9,326 sf 6 0 6 6 1 6 9 . 2 8 1 1 6 0 K 56 5 .L 1 62 0 A 6 6 1 W E 2 D I 18 7 0 7,623 sf S . 4 4 5' . 0 82 0 5 7,094 sf445 6 6 5 2 1 0 1 5 6. 0 20 6 7,623 sf 9 72 1 0 3 . 0 6 65 .0 8,863 sf 0 2 W 6 5 6 1 / 3 0 R 6 19 8 7,623 sf 2 2 36 0 2 0 . 0 1 1 0 5 7 6. 0 19 4 0 B 6 7,623 sf 5 0- 5 21 .5 0B 1 0 3 5 6 3 5 1 1 2 6,566 sf66 1 3 3 31 0 20 5 0 0 5 1 5 .. 010,798 sf6 0 0 18 2 6 57,623 sf 5 6,312 sf C 6 1 1 26 6 LICENSE NO. 1 T 8' TRAIL 0 5 E 1 5 0 5 521 .E 1 2 0 5 5 R 6,835 sf 0 5 .17 MINNESOTA T 0 6 7,623 sf S 23 2 8 31 6 11 26 66 1 5 6 6 0 7 2 1 1 4 . 6 1 6 8,988 sf 0 16 5 3. 0 8 6 7,623 sf 0 3 24 DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF 7,623 sf 0 5 6 6 0 0 . 26 1 1 5 3 6 6 2 6 91 2 9,157 sf 8 2 1 0 5 . 3 0 56 . 0 15 6 7,623 sf 25 69 7,623 sf 8 945 6 1 26 1 6 1 26 1 0 7 5 5. . 0 0 66 8 5 14 7,845 sf 26 7,623 sf A T EE RT S 6 1 6 2 1 6 1 26 8 1 5 7 K 5 .2 L 0 6 A 0 W 5 E . 13 0 D I 6 8 S 165 ' 8,048 sf 5 16 27 85 755 7,623 sf 3 85 7 2 5 . 0 6 11 6 6 0 26 1 7 .5 05.00 66 12 05.0 06 8,023 sf5 5 . .06 75 56.5 0 06 6 60.71 2 1 28 G7,623 sf B 5U 5 T 0 T 5 . 2 E 56 6 1 8,067 sf2 6 E 2 1 11 1 R W / T 0 R S 1 6 6 0 10 5 8. 0 0 20 6 86 5 38,079 sf 51 26 1 9 2 6 125 4 29 7,978 sf1 1 8 0 7,809 sf 7 5 . 8,106 sf B 7,670 sf8,060 sf 0 0- 6 8,060 sf 5 . 2 5 0B 6 2 3 1 16 0 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 6 4 3 30 6 0 8 5 .17 2 5 6 8,118 sf 5 052 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 06 71 2 10,517 sf 1 9 4 7 160 167 164 17 0 5 . 2 75 6 66 36 26 31 06 8,124 sf 6 4 2 1 9,500 sf 0 .5 2 6 5 7 9 2 6 1 32 0 0 5 . 8,110 sf 0 2 56 2 . 62 7 16 5 6 5.2 2 0 6 1 7 6 22.6605.2 05.26 05.26 33 PREPARED FOR: 7 2 8,146 sf 1 9 6 E 6 34 2 T 18,146 sf 9 2 2 2 E 2 3 3 3 3 1 39 1 35 E 1 1 3837 36 8,257 sf R 7,812 sf 8,749 sf3 8,257 sf 8,292 sf 8,430 sf7 T 9 6 5 S 3 1 0 3 5 4. . 2 5 3 2 6 7 1 2 96 6 9 6 13 2 10,405 sf 965 5 7,820 sf 66 2696 3501 1 6 0 K 57 5 . 53 3 L 1 02 86 6 52 206 5.A .1 0 1 6 6 W E D I S ' B 5 - 6 B T 0 B EERTS 2 .2 5 1 6 341 1 14 2 8,222 sf4 1 16 5 11,790 sf 3 65 1 16 06 16146 12 17,876 sf 3 7 . 1 7 0 6 8 2 6 2 5.0 0 7 06 35. 11 05.0 605.06 05.06 16,085 sf 2 15 9 01 1 8,485 sf 2 1 0 . 1 6 10 15,319 sf 4 ..... 3 1 6 12/29/21 77 8 D 5 2 T E 1 7 E 9 08 R 1. 1 T S 511,847 sf 13,426 sf 42 6 4 5 15 8 1 7,995 sf 9,786 sf 11,777 sf 12,702 sf 7 16 ..... 8 08,493 sf 7 0 1 7 2 5.064 12 . 2 1 8 1 6 0 2 0 5 18 INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: 1 2 27 2 1 421 811 0 1 0 0 52 7 5 . 4 1 10 4 0 6 . 3 ... 5 7 ### 17 8,642 sf 90 OR 6 1 4 1### 3 7 1 0 1 ########### 4 5 1 2 82 0 5 9 5 6 0 . 3 1 6 B - B 4 4 8 8 3 4 1 2 18 0 6 10,307 sf W / R 7 1 4 4 DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: 1 74 8 1 N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-PPP02.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 OF 150' 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance 11 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 100' 1" = 50 0030343.00 ### 0' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NUMBER: PRELIMINARY PLAT 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 PhoneFax | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | COTTAGE GROVE, MN | | | | | | | MISSISSIPPI LANDING | | | 2 |9 0 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | LICENSE NO. | | | 8' TRAIL | | MINNESOTA | | |809,279 sf | | | OUTLOT C | | | | | DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |POND | | | 45 | 7 2 |7 2 | | 7 2 | 5 3 | | | | | 9 5 | | |9 6 | 0 5 | | | 6 |2 8 1 1 2 | 6 9,015 sf 2 2 |6 0 1 2 5 . | 1 1 5 |5 7 9,353 sf 0 |2 5 | 0 | 20 6 | 74.0 10,083 sf 5 R 9 |4 | 7 | 0 2 5 . 3 |8 8 1 3 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 7 2 5 2 1 |4 1 . 0 5 | 6 2 |5 5 153 4 6 . 0 |R 7 5 1 | 0 2 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 8 | 3 3 | 3 0 |5 6,727 sf . 1 6,846 sf 4 8 5 8 512 2 5 1 0 5 . 0 5 19 7 9,015 sf 4 . 7 00 5 . 5 5 1 5 6,671 sf 6 2 3 5 6 5 2 1 7 2 21 6 PREPARED FOR: 3 6 3 6,566 sf 6 2 2 31 8 7 5 4 5 . 0 1 7 1 5 1 5 4 5 0 0 6,489 sf . 6 6 6 2 1 2 9,011 sf 18 3 1 4 5 7 0 5 .1 2 1 6 5 6 2 1 1 . 1 5 4 5 OUTLOT C 5 8,384 sf 2 5 6,447 sf 17 1 5 4 3 6 6 2 1 D 1 . 8 1 5 037 5 3 3 T 8 7 1 0 E 3 E 1 5 . R 2 5 T 4 S 2 1 5 6,447 sf 16 0 55 3 8' TRAIL 4 6 B 6 1- 2 5 B 1 0 0 5 . 02 . 5 22 5 1 6 5 6,733 sf 6 5 2 7 1 0 5 15 8,190 sf 23 26,615 sf 6 6 2 14 1..... 6 2 1 1 5 6,565 sf 12/29/21 05 3 6 1 24 8,633 sf 2 9 3 5 0 5 . 1 0 5 13 5 6,565 sf 0 3 ..... 0 1 4 0 . 6 5 6 0 9 0 5 INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: 0 5 . 0 0 0 12 5 0 5.5 6,565 sf 5 0 6 7 0 1 55 3 3 1 4 9 1 15 1 1 5 11 0 5 0 . 1 0 5 3 0 5... 6,565 sf B 3 0 - 0 5 . 3 0 B 1 5 12### 8,808 sf 0 5 C 1 1 6 5 2 OR T 2 2 1 1 E 10 0 5 5 .E 9,943 sf 0 6 5 R 56,565 sf 0### T 0 5 . 3 S 0 1 5 ########### 11 0 W 56,363 sf / 3 0 0 0 4 8 6 R 1 67 5 6 W 29 / 9 1 7 0 R 6 5 . 0 5 6,565 sf 0 0 B 5 . 3-0 1 5 0B 3 10 1 56,363 sf 6 0 7 0 . 0 5 6 7 5 2 1 0 8 5 . 0 0 5 5 6,844 sf 0 5 0.1 5 0 6 3 5 8 9 1 0 5 K 6,363 sf DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: L A 13 1 6 59,956 sf W 2 E 1 D I S ' N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-PPP02.DWG 5 7,746 sf MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 OF 150' 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance 8 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 100' 1" = 50 0030343.00 ### 0' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NUMBER: PRELIMINARY PLAT K L A D 0 W T E 6 E 8 0 E R 16 D 5 T I 8,196 sf S S 7 8 ' 5 1 5 5 7,553 sf 3 2 9 4 .12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 0 6 9 8 5 .3 0 1 6 0 0 5 2 66 1 0 2 1 0 5 . 0 0 28 6 6 510,896 sf 7 4 4 1 7 8,030 sf (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 2 6 4 30 0 7,553 sf 9,411 sf 0 29 2 53 7 .6 76 46 4 5 9,729 sf. 70 2 20 6 3 1 00 5 2 6 16 9 8 0 5 . PhoneFax 0 0 6 3 15 6 9 4 3 1 6 3 6 1 . 0 7,865 sf 11 8 7 3 1 3 896 5 2 0 0 3 6 5 B - B 0 0 31 3 7,741 sf 5 71 4. 3 000.7 6 4 1 6 4 6 11,003 sf3 5 5 0 5 8 6 65 6 6 16 1 1 1 32 W / 4 8,467 sf R 1 6 2 4 7 3 81 16 11,055 sf 11,030 sf 10,723 sf 5 4 7 3 3 11,419 sf 10,635 sf. 5 8,052 sf 2 2 98 4 . 1 4 6 37 6 1 4 6 2 8 7 5 1 8,050 sf1 2 00.76 058.66 339.56 . 1 4 6 4 5 1 7 5 9,682 sf 1 0 3 .7 94 6 4 6 35 76 276 66 14 6 0 5 . E 1 6 T 9 .5 E 5 4 6 7 721 E KLAWEDIS '5 R 1 B 3 T 00W 1- 2 0 / 36 S B 6 F R TEERTS F 9 3 T 0 5 E E R T COTTAGE GROVE, MN S 1 7 56 3 5 1 42 0 0 54 0 07 . 00 07 7 07 . 3 7 MISSISSIPPI LANDING 4 3. 0 7 21 3 1 00.07 00.07 1 10 00.07 0 0.07 7 15,988 sf 3 9 7 5 12,852 sf . 4 7 90.38 7 11 1 1 9 2 15 1416 13 12,429 sf 12,250 sf 12 641 5 55 5 5 2 7 7 7 1 1 1 9 2 4 4 6 17,961 sf 0 4 5 7 2 K .1 6 L 1 2 A 2 6 2 E W E 12,501 sf T 9 D 17,148 sf E I 2 5 20,672 sf 1 E S 2 8 . 7 R '3 4 T 3 5 7 8 2 1 S 2 19,857 sf 6 2 1 LICENSE NO. 44 8 5.4 3 0 6 4 9,544 sf 10 MINNESOTA 1 9 . 9 85 5 07 27 4 2 1 5 7 . 0 6 1 7 8 6 2 2 25,212 sf 2 4 DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF 3 1 .6 4 21,683 sf 0 5 1 7 66 311 18 3 12,857 sf 6 1 5 4 6 10,717 sf7 3 10 1 0 . 5 6 9 39 62 1 8 6 5 6 4 6 1 6 7 1 4 7 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 0 4 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 1 8 PREPARED FOR: 0 0 4 16,234 sf 1 1 H 4 T O L T U O ..... 12/29/21 ..... INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: 1 4 ... ### OR ### ########### DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-PPP02.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 OF 150' 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance 13 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 100' 1" = 50 0030343.00 ### 0' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NUMBER: PRELIMINARY PLAT 85 3 2 2 0 .1 1 0 2 0 8 6. 9 1 1 5 6 3 1 1 3 6 5 5 .5 6 2 5 21 11 8,015 sf 6,864 sf 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 1 9 27 68,411 sf 69 1 24 26 18,147 sf 16 0 5 5 2 . 3 0 W 1 6/ R 0 0 0 . 8 6 0 5 51 .2 6 20 . 5 8 22 2 1 2 6 46 1 2 6,733 sf 5 6 5 27,995 sf6 1 9 10 0 9 6 5 . 2 8 0 0(952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 17,803 sf 5 3 .6 1 0 B 1 6 6 6 - B 23 4 28 0 7 5 8,214 sf 3 2 6,615 sf 1 5 0 5 0 . 1 1 6 2 6 0 . 4 2 6 0 3 1 7,933 sf PhoneFax 5 1 6 06 6 0 6 2 5 . 12 0 1 6 9 1 13 361 5 8,230 sf 4 5 29 6 K 9 L 8,380 sf 3 4 A 2 6 W 6 0 .2 7,623 sf 3 E 1 2 1 0 D 6. 9 I 1 6 7,932 sf S 7 6 26 3 0 ' 7 16 3 5 5. 1 0 6 8 1 5 3 1 1 0 76 5 . 5 0 6 2 2 8 1 7,623 sf 5 30 8,870 sf6 2 8,676 sf7 6 0 7 2. 6 2 7,905 sf 1 6 8 4 5 3 3 33 1 8 4 18. 1 0 2 1 5 1 . 0 1 6 6 6 8 1 5 3 4 9,943 sf 4 2 31 1 0 6. 1 8,404 sf 2 6 6 4 8,345 sf 2 7 9 2 1 0 7 5 .4 W 4 9 3 2 10,591 sf /6 7. R 9 0 7 6 3 76 2 1 3 1 . 1 7 1 1 0 32 6 0 2. 2 8,120 sf8 7 6 34 5 6 5 3 7 12 6 6 2 1 61 8,371 sf 0 5 . 3 33 30 . 1 6 6 7,901 sf 6 6 7 7 COTTAGE GROVE, MN 66 6 3 2 218,037 sf1 5 1 1 8 9 7 2 8 1 34 G 7,728 sf MISSISSIPPI LANDING 2 6 T 2 1 4 E 6382,245 sf 7 4 8,363 sf 6 0 E 4 5 1. 6 1 0 1 R 7 6 OUTLOT F 10,309 sf T 3 5 S 8' TRAIL 35 4 9,850 sf 6 2 1 10,003 sf 1 6 0 4 61 2 1 7 6 . 2 8 7 70 5 . 0 3 6 3 8 62 8,714 sf 0 6 1 5 5 . 0 2 0 9 3 .8 8,515 sf 0 5 .2 06 6 3 1 7 8 7 61 6 2 K 1 L A 2 W 621 8 5 E. 8 0 5 6 D 8,183 sf B I 0- S W3 B '0 6/ 21 5 2 6 1 R 9,326 sf 6 2 8 5 6 8 5 2. 521 0 1 6 LICENSE NO. 22 1 B T E E 9,578 sf R DT 6 S 2 1 6 5 5 7,623 sf T 6 9 5 MINNESOTA 2 E 5 1 6. 7 0 E 6 R 0 0 2 . 18 5 T 5 7 8,304 sf 9 67 S 5 6 2 7 . 8 7 4 7 17 10,813 sf 65 POND 7 27 6 . 6 1 DATE: 1I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF 7 6 0 13 4 7 1 6 1 03 4 22 2 9,751 sf 0 17 0 5 . 7,810 sf 4 0 6 6 2 1 18 8,569 sf 0 5 5 7. 0 0 7 4 6 3 1 6 .4 0 6 16 2 9 23 7,641 sf2 61 2 1 7,623 sf 2 19 9 78,766 sf 6 2 1 1 2 3 4 3 6 7 4 . 1 0 7 6 0 5 . 0 6 7 6 2 .16 8 24 85 0 8,810 sf 7,623 sf7 6 5 20 1 69,390 sf 2 7 4 00 . 5 . 0 21 15 5 .7 06 6 49,722 sf 5 731 4 34 7 4 5 1 5 3 1 1 63 951 5 92 3 7 7 7 9 7 6 9. 7 5 0 7 6 1 15 1 9,079 sf 7 4 4 1 6 6 10,044 sf 0 2 . 0 K. L 21 0 50 9 A 6 72 10,825 sf . W 14 E 1 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 4 9,890 sf D 6 I 38 S 63 51 ' 5 5 3 1 6 7 4 00 5 1 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 1 1 93 7 7 5 6 . 8 0 1 6 1 3 9 56 14 9,363 sf 11 1 4 . 0 6 7 3 8 1 . 5 13 2 1 11 6 4 6 3 22 8,727 sf 13,044 sf 6 10,114 sf 0 4 1 0 13,315 sf 6 5 . 31 0 6 5 5 2 1 PREPARED FOR: 6 0 6 6. 0 6 1 3 0 3 1 2 3 5 2 1 5 13 64 3 3 7 5 9,127 sf 5 6 6 1 8 10,517 sf6 9 . 7 0 12 9 6 7,558 sf 0 6 1 5 4 2. 0 6 5 9 3 23 1 1 0 8,486 sf 5 926 7,875 sf6 1 7 0 00 . 5 3. 60 0 6 6 3 5 6 7 W 1/ R 3 5 52 21 6 W 1 0/ 6R 2 12 0 6 6 0 8,196 sf 6 0 5 .11 3 0 0 4 . 6 7,552 sf6 3 2 6 4 . 0 8 6 5 3 1 00 5 2 7,563 sf66 10 1 24 7,875 sf 0 5 . 0 6 0 B -6 31 B 6 B 466- B 0 5 2 3 1 2 5 0 2 3 6 11 11 5 26 8,196 sf 1 70 10 6 0 5 .. 6 7 0 6 6 7,553 sf 2 4 . 0 6 5 3 1 00 5 25 266 7,563 sf1 2 0 6 5 0 . 7,820 sf1 6 0 6 0 6 11 11,113 sf 5 2 1 6 2 1 10 8,196 sf..... 1 0 7 6 4 6 0 9 .12/29/21 0 1 1 5 7,552 sf 6 2 2 1 4 . G 0 6 5 3 1 0 0 5 T 26 16 E 8,515 sf 0 26 5 E. 1 0 ..... 6 R 0 6 11,790 sf T 5 9 5 7 S 3 9 7 . 31 0 23 INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: 10 8 8,196 sf 3 6 9 . 2 0 6 7 8 7,553 sf 2 4 . 0 9 6 15 1 3 1 01 5 5266 1 5 0 ... 5 . 0 27 K 6 L ### A 3 10,175 sf 9 . D 0 0 W 6 T E 6 E OR 8 0 E R 6 1 D 5 T I 8,196 sf S S 7 8 '### 5 1 5 5 7,553 sf 3########### 2 9 4 . 0 6 9 8 5 .3 0 1 6 0 0 5 2 66 1 0 2 1 0 5 . 0 0 28 6 6 510,896 sf 7 4 4 1 7 8,030 sf 2 6 4 30 0 7,553 sf 9,411 sf 0 29 2 53 76 . 76 46 4 5 9,729 sf. DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: 70 2 20 6 3 1 00 6 6 N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-PPP02.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 OF 150' 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance Call 48 Hours before digging:14 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 100' 1" = 50 0030343.00 ### 0' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NUMBER: PRELIMINARY PLAT |12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 05 | | | | | | | | | | | | (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 | | | | | | | | PhoneFax | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | POND | | | 5 1 | 5 | COTTAGE GROVE, MN | | | | | | | |MISSISSIPPI LANDING | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | LICENSE NO. POND MINNESOTA 8' TRAIL DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF 15 75 0 6 7 1 2 6 3 5 1 7 1 5 1 5 13 1 5 1 7 8 2 6 128 1 1128 19 1262 20 1 86,749 sf 6,457 sf 2 6,780 sf 2 18 5 1 7,382 sf 2 POND 6,839 sf 1 3 17 5 6,448 sf2 7,382 sf 81 2 1 4 25.0505.0565.05 5 5 2 .0 6,375 sf 57 1 8 5.1 0 7 5 5 16 5 0 6,375 sf2 5. 0 5 1 7,382 sf 5 7 . 0 6 5 8 5 23651207 3114 0 2 1 0 6,375 sf . 4 1 6 5 1 8 4 7 2 1 0 0 6,375 sf . 1 5 5 8 3 7 .6 0 4 5 0 4 0. 15 1 1 5 5 5 7,298 sf 8' TRAIL 0 1 0. 5 65 1 6 5 4 2 1 5 7 . 1 809,279 sf5 0 5 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 1 5 OUTLOT C 06 556 5 4 14 07 6,587 sf 6 05 71 1 C 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 2 T 1 E 0 E 8 R 5 .0 T 9 5 S . 1 0 4 5 0 1 B 5 00.56 3- B 0 5 0 W 6 0/ 5 R 6 0 13 5 5 3 1. 0 2 5 6,648 sf 992 K 9 L 4 69,467 sf 5 0 2 A 1.5 0 05 1 5 . W 1 E 5 D I 125 5 1211 1 0 .5 0 S 5 9,027 sf 22 '8,108 sf 5 0 5 2 53 5 PREPARED FOR: 1. 0 58 5 1 12 2 6 6 2 21 6,685 sf2 1 6,472 sf1 5 1 . 0 5 8 0 2 5 1 W 2 5.6 .4 /6 3 20 1 2 .5 R 55 5 6,309 sf 0 1 6 13 7,594 sf 6 3 0 2 19 53 2 6,309 sf1 5 4 4 56 63 52 1118 6,309 sf1 6,735 sf 1 0 5 .5 .2 63 2 2 2 0 8 5 6 1 5 2 5 . 2 1 1 B 65 17 6,309 sf 5 1 - B 1 0 5 3 0 5 0 5 3 2 4 5 14 6,766 sf 10 5 0 5 5 6,685 sf 0 1 5 .5 0 6 . 1 2 0 2 6 5 5 1 54 2 . 0 15 C 3 0 23 5 6 T E 0 5 3 6 E 59 2 R 5 9 7 T 14,314 sf 4 15 S 6,682 sf 0 5 6,778 sf 5 .5 8 1 5 2 1 1 5 . 2 5 7 7 2 7 1 1 0 10 8 0 8 1. 8 5 15,051 sf 9 6 2 5 5 6,727 sf 6 5 3 54 1 3 85. 4 55 2 2 5 1 16 6 15 6,893 sf 10,992 sf 1 5 . 8 2 2 5 1 9 0 24 5 1 3 1 2 6 6,671 sf5 11,888 sf 5 5 6 9 0 5 17 1 0 ...... 1 6,942 sf6 9 51 .9 57,868 sf 6 2 2 550 5 1 9 12/29/21 A 8 5 2 1 1 1. 3 T 2 1 14 2 6 5 E 0 10,282 sf 5 .E 4 00 6 5 1 56 5. R 0 3 6 T 4 18 1 S 5 5 .6,912 sf ..... 5 2 5 25 8 9,653 sf 9 9 5 23 1 28,014 sf8 21 5 36 89 INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: 1 5 7 9,888 sf 82 13 23 1 1 5 1 8 1. 0 5 5 .19 52 1 . 26 0 6,886 sf 5 6 6 51 8 7 2 0 2 5 0 . 156 1 1 6 6 ... 7 8,000 sf 26 ### 8,561 sf 12 1 5 6 . 09,239 sf1 2 20 36 5 1 46,866 sf16 4 3 OR 5 4 0 4 5 1 . 6 0 855 3 6 2 2 0 .1 1 0### 2 0 8 6. 9 1 1 5 6########### 3 1 1 6 53 5 .5 6 2 5 21 11 8,015 sf 6,864 sf 1 9 27 68,411 sf 69 1 24 26 18,147 sf 16 0 52 5 . 3 0 W 1 6/ R 0 0 0 . 8 6 0 5 5 1 .2 6 20 . 5 8 22 2 1 2 6 46 1 2 6,733 sf 5 6 5 27,995 sf6 1 9 10 0 9 6 5 . 2 8 00 DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: 17,803 sf 5 3 .6 1 0 B 1 6 6 6 - B 23 4 28 7 8,214 sf 6,615 sf N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-PPP02.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 OF 150' 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance Call 48 Hours before digging:15 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 100' 1" = 50 0030343.00 ### 0' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NUMBER: PRELIMINARY PLAT 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 POND PhoneFax 3 5 2 7 7 3 8 7 COTTAGE GROVE, MN MISSISSIPPI LANDING LICENSE NO. MINNESOTA DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF 599,168 sf OUTLOT G EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 46 PREPARED FOR: 5 5 6 6 1 1 1 10,723 sf 39.56 66 60 07 ..... 12/29/21 00.07 ..... INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: 16 12,429 sf 5 5 7 7 1 1 ... ### OR ### ########### 27 0 13 092 DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-PPP02.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 OF 150' 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance Call 48 Hours before digging:16 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 100' 1" = 50 0030343.00 ### 0' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NUMBER: PRELIMINARY PLAT 5 1 5 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 PhoneFax 1 5 91 4 8' TRAIL 1 5 8' TRAIL 1 5 1 5 7 5 4 6 1 1 5 0 17 3 1 7,150 sf 1 5 POND 0 OUTLOT C 1 5 6 R 16 0 0 . 1 6,968 sf 5 0 3 15 5 5 1 1 5 COTTAGE GROVE, MN 5 4 0 4 6 5.0 1 R 28 5 4 1 2 244 6 15 5 8,019 sf 2 6,375 sf 1 7 MISSISSIPPI LANDING 5 5 5 6,375 sf2 3 1 0 5 .0 1 13 1 5 8 5 0 2 0 6,375 sf .0 10. 51 1 5 0 00 9 0. 1. 00.1551 5 5 0 2 0 6,375 sf .3 1 5 1 1 9 9 14 2 5 7,670 sf 10 0 21 0 6,375 sf 1. 5 1 5 1 0 0 3 11 3 1 0 1 0.6,806 sf 13 1 1 5 5 8 7,363 sf 5 12 7,381 sf 0 1 0. 5 1 5 C T 1 E E R 1 5 T S 0 B 3- K BL 4 A 16 5 9 W E 3 0 D I S W ' 6 5 / 0 R 3 9 5 4 4 9 2 1 7 17 0 5 0 56 C 2 T E E R T LICENSE NO. S 8 5 3 1 . 0 5 5 9 7 6867,202 sf . 5 6 5 4 1. 0 5 4 OUTLOT E MINNESOTA 36 10,040 sf 0 0. 5 6 3 3 6 2 1 2 4 16 1531 616 2 18 6,309 sf 1 6 2 0 0. 17 5 6,309 sf1 7 DATE: 0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF 1 5 . 250 0 35 5 9 5 8 6 06 0 2..6,666 sf 8,178 sf 0 2 16 6 1 5 6 6 14 9,347 sf 5 2 1 031 0 5 12 7 83 1 9,407 sf2 1 0 5 0 1 5 . G 0 13 5 7,934 sf 0 5 5 5 67 34 6,594 sf 3 T 5 E 7 . 0 E 5 R 0 15 231 T 0 7,899 sf . 5 S 6 1 6 5 77 9 3 01 4 15 0 10,992 sf 5 . 021 6 0 55 5 33 9 6,918 sf 58 6 5 1 8 7 5 . 5 0 6 5 . 9 0 6 B - B 5 16 341 1 0 7,034 sf 3 0 0 . 1 11 6 8,698 sf 2 3 5 1 3 1 0 5 5 6 .3 1 7 0 5 14 4 5 32 10,282 sf 7,251 sf 4 0 6 3 12 11 7 K 5 L 9 A 1 5 I 6 W.17 0 E 541 6,686 sf 6 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 D T I 5 3 S 7 E . 8 ' 0 1 E 3 5 5 1 R 1 5 T 0 8,699 sf 5 1 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 10.3 S 5 5 0 5 5 5 31 7,457 sf 6 7 7 5 0 0 . 5 1 3 6 1 W 18/ 6,619 sf 6 R 5 051 . 5 0 0 6 7 6 . 0 10 3 5 1 5 1 6 1 5 12 0 5 . 3 5 0 5 5 9 5 30 9,085 sf 77,686 sf 5 3 1 PREPARED FOR: 19 6,552 sf 5 6 5 . 945 07 1 . 3 6 1 0 8 2 2 5 1 1 1 1 5 5 0 5 1.3 6 0 5 1 5 8 29 4 7,795 sf 8,848 sf 5 20 1 0 6,720 sf 5 . 0 5 6 0 7 3. 16 0 3051 1 5 1 5 1 6 6 7 7 9 0 4 5 . 7,877 sf1 0 5 2 5 0 7 28 5 . 27,333 sf 0 1 6 1 3 1 0 21 5 2 8,313 sf 7 . 4 0 5 631 6 1 1 52 21 7,932 sf6 0 5 . 0 4 6 9 14 3 6 . 1 3 0 5 2 5 3 27 5 8,088 sf 3 9 5 6 . 0 5 7,905 sf1 6 22 85 9,066 sf 2 3 0 13 1 8 52 3 9 6 . 0 8 5 6 5 0 9 53 3 13..... 6 61 . 0 5 12/29/21 8 2 26 4 9,492 sf 6 . 09 .6 60 95 6. 0 5 8 5 4 0 23 R 0 6 3 49,492 sf..... 1 R 5 12 POND 8 5 2 5 0 3 1 INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: 25 0 9,492 sf 3 1 24 9,492 sf 5 5 8 2 ... 8 2 ### 8 2 OR 8 2 5 5 82,245 sf ### 52 58 2########### 8 OUTLOT F 8 8 3 DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-PPP02.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 02/05/2020 GD25AGD25A LAST REVISED: OF 450' 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance Call 48 Hours before digging:17 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 300' AT GARAGE DOOR LOT CORNER ELEVATIONLOT NUMBERREAR GROUND GRADE ATLOOKOUTMINIMUM BASEMENTFLOOR ELEVATIONFRONT GROUND GRADE 150' 989.6 6.089 1" = DRIVEWAY 0030343.00 G 150' 983.0TYPICAL LOT 0 . 0 . 1 6 9 8 99 9 9 VARIES LO 980.00' 2.989 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NUMBER: TO PROPOSED GRADE. ELEVATIONS AND HOUSE STYLES SHOWN ARE ENGINEERS SUGGESTED INDICATES A CUSTOM HOUSE PAD WHICH HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETELY GRADED OR PREPAREDDESIGN FOR CUSTOM LOTS AND SHOULD BE VERIFIED WITH THE DEVELOPER. THE NUMBER IN THE PARENTHESIS INDICATES THE SOG = SLAB ON GRADE UNIT.SOG (1) = SLAB ON GRADE UNIT GRADED FOR 0.70' OF DIFFERENCE FROM SLAB FLOOR ELEVATION TO FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE FLOOR.SOG (2) = SLAB ON GRADE UNIT GRADED FOR 1.30' OF DIFFERENCE FROM SLAB FLOOR ELEVATION TO FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE FLOOR. TO FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE DOOR. NUMBER OF BLOCKS THAT THE GARAGE IS DROPPED. EACH BLOCK=8". R = RAMBLER, GRADED FOR 8.2' OF DIFFERENCE FROM BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION GRADE AT THE LOOKOUT TO THE FRONT GROUND GRADE AT THE GARAGE DOOR.WO = FULL BASEMENT WALKOUT GRADED FOR 8.7' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE REAR GROUND GRADE AT THE WALKOUT TO THE FRONT GROUND GRADE AT THE GARAGE DOOR.SE = SPLIT ENTRY GRADED FOR 4.0' OF DIFFERENCE FROM BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION TO THE FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE DOOR.SE WO = SPLIT ENTRY WALKOUT, GRADED FOR 4.5' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATION AT THE REAR OF THE PAD TO THE FRONT GARAGE SLAB ELEVATION AT FRONT OF HOUSE.NOTE:1. LO = FULL BASEMENT LOOKOUT GRADED FOR 5.4' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE REAR GROUND TWO ROWS OF SILT FENCE (SEPARATED BY 8 FEET); ORTOPSOIL BERM AND FIBER LOGS (STABILIZE BERM WITH MULCH). SILT FENCE AND A TOPSOIL BERM (STABILIZE BERM WITH MULCH); ORSILT FENCE AND FIBER LOGS; OR DRAINAGE ARROW CUSTOM 3.1.3.2.3.3.3.4. ALL CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN TO FINISHED SURFACE/GUTTER GRADESCONFORM TO THE CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE'S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREET &AND LAYOUT.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES ANDTOPOGRAPHICAL FEATURES WITH THE OWNERS AND FIELD-VERIFY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES ORVARIATIONS FROM PLAN.ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL RULES.ALL SILT FENCE AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SHALL BE IN-PLACE PRIOR TO ANYCOVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. EXISTING SILT FENCE ON-SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND ORSHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT.ALL STREETS DISTURBED DURING WORKING HOURS MUST BE CLEANED AT THE END OF EACHWORKING DAY. A ROCK ENTRANCE TO THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED ACCORDING TO DETAILSTO REDUCE TRACKING OF DIRT ONTO PUBLIC STREETS.WITHIN 50 FEET OF SURFACE WATERS. REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS COULD INCLUDE:OF THE SURFACE WATER. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST. TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALLUTILITY CONSTRUCTION.REFER TO THE SITE PLAN/RECORD PLAT FOR MOST CURRENT HORIZONTAL SITE DIMENSIONSPOSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED AT ALL TIMES.EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL VIABLE TURF OR GROUNDREMOVED AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. IT IS OFEXTREME IMPORTANCE TO BE AWARE OF CURRENT FIELD CONDITIONS WITH RESPECT TOEROSION CONTROL. TEMPORARY PONDING, DIKES, HAY BALES, ETC., REQUIRED BY THE CITYREDUNDANT PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS ARE NECESSARY WHEN SOIL DISTURBANCE ISREDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO DISTURBING WITHIN 50 FEET OVERALL GRADING & 2.3.4.6.2.3.4. GRADING & DRAINAGE NOTES 1.5.1. EROSION CONTROL NOTES EROSION CONTROL PLAN FM X X X X FM FM FM M F H O P O F S AH O| GP | H | O O F 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 | P | M| F H| O P | | | | | S | H A O | GP | H O|(952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 O F P| X | | M F FHS | O P | | X | | PhoneFax | SF S 22 H| A O P G|X | H | O FO P | | X | HF M S O | FP | | 18 | X 17 | | S H 16 A|F O PS G | | H X O O| F 15 P |7 1 5 F | HS O P| OUTLOT C FM 14 | | | 6 1 | 13 | H SO | P AF S | G |12 H | O O F | P 13 5 1 | H 11 O | P F S | | FM 14 |110 2 | 5 C 4 |T 20E 1 H E R O|9 T P S15 S SEE SHEET | A | G F 8 | S 3 H O |16 O F P 3 | 1 19 H |7 O 6 7 P | 1 9 17 | 6 | FM 8 | 2 1 18 4 1 | 5 8 H| 18 O COTTAGE GROVE, MN P | S 19 A| G 4 OUTLOT C | F 1 6 7 1 H 9 S |1 O 17 1 O 20 F | P D 3 |T 7 . E 0 F E 6 |S 0 R MISSISSIPPI LANDING H 21 3 T + O S 7 0 9 P|16 1 1 M| F 22 |5 5 1 | 15 23 |9 2 S 144 7 A | GH 24 O| P HF 13 S O 6 | O 3 EXISTING CULVERT TO REMAIN F P 8 4 | 1 1 12 7 | 4 2 30 | 11 | M 12 7 F C 1 H T |0 10E E O 7 R 31 T P S 3 |11 1 F S 9 | S A 32 G 10 |6 9 H 8 6 | O O 9 F P 33 13 |41257 2 7 1 | 8 X H 5 3 O 8 34 | P 6 14 7 | M 7 6 FF 35 |S 154 6 | 71 A 6 4 T 1 E 3 E R 5 |T 16S 5 H| O H 4 O F 2 O LICENSE NO. P| 17 P 6 6 21 | 21 0 02 1 B 18 |4T 1 EE TR DS 20 T |E 3 E 5 MINNESOTA 3 M R F 6 T 19 F S |S 9 4 19 1 H| 3 O 3 P 20 | 4 1822 2 9 12/29/21 1 6 C | O T E 8 F PROPOSED 21" CULVERTIE = 709.95E 2 1 R |17 T S23 2 19 2 | 3 GAS TANKS 1 6 FFS SFS 16 RYAN M. BLUHMDATE: 16 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF 0 24 7 0 . 0 1 1 20 0 8 0 M 0 + 2 F 0656 17 05 0 15 0.00 1+1856 25 1 95 06 F S 6 1 14 1 5 26 5 A SF TEERTS7 O 1 F 0+1 FS 00.0 2 21 WATER PUMP 13 7 27 1 05 1 12 1 4 4 5 28 B T E E 118 F R T S S M 1022 2 S 56 F 9 6 29 8 A 7 4 1 F G 6 S 19 F S 3 30 IE= 709.67 5 2 2 0 F 3 0 .1 0 S 5 B O 0 F F 1 T 30 9 23 S E31 1 + X E4 1 R T S F 2 32 S 2 SEE SHEET 3 33 25 1 E 8 3 34 T10 24 2 0 E 3 M 3935E EXISTING 48" CULVERTSTO REMAIN3837 5 36 2 1 R F S T F S F AS 1 XS 1 G 1 A T E 0 E 1 25 X 132 R 49 T F S 5 678 O 4 11 S 4 F 0 F 11 S 5 3 B TEERTS 14 OUTLOT B SF OUTLOT A26 1 M F 5 12 3 00 01 . 0 S 11 0 F 15 PROPOSED 24" CULVERTIE= 707.52 A+S X 0 0---- G 2 0 10 56 0 27 F . S 06 D 00 1 4 T 0 7E E 1 239R T +F S 6 S 7 01 456 0 8 5 REMOVE EXISTING CULVERTS 0 F FO 16. S 0 M 1 F WATER PUMP 0 28 7 0 1+ FSF S 1 1 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 6 SFF 1 30 S 29 F F 1 SS XF 14 6 S 17 8 0 15 SF 9 S M A F F G SEE SHEET S 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 5 31 9 0 1 F 18 FS OHS 4 F 2 O 6 P F 3 S 6 0 1 X 1 2 SA G 8 5 F SF S 1 19 XOH 1 P S A 00. H 00 G+1 F 1 O 1 P 1 E S 7 SH 1 5 O FFPX T AX E S S E 3 G X R F 20 15 T 6 S S 7 S A X 4 F G 6 T 50 E .E R T 6 S 2 H 7 O 1 H P 1+ OF P 3 S 0 S 0 X 5 A RE= 706.0. 21 PREPARED FOR: G 501 10 0 24" IE= 701.0 H+ O 1 9 P 3 17 19 CONSTRUCT STMH. OVER EXISTING 48" ASF 4 GS EXIST. 48" IE= 698.56 6 4 5 4+ 6 H . 7 O P H F 44 OF 3 P 22 S 5 S 0 2 +F S 3 1 E F 1 S T E E 8 R T S 5 F 6 23 FSH 5 S O 3 0 .P 5 4 1 6 5 6 6 + F 247 S 6 6 6 5 F S 2 5 20 25 3 10 F F H S T E O E P R T S F S 2 F S 1 5 F SX 1 H H O P 0 O 0 5 P 0 F . . S 0 S L I 0 OUTLOT I A + R T 0 D 5 U X S O A L C G Y E R G S A G H H T O O L P T U ..... O 12/29/21 S A SEE SHEET G ..... INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: ... 150' DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-GDP01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 02/05/2020 GD25AGD25A LAST REVISED: OF 450' 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance Call 48 Hours before digging:18 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 300' AT GARAGE DOOR LOT CORNER ELEVATIONLOT NUMBERREAR GROUND GRADE ATLOOKOUTMINIMUM BASEMENTFLOOR ELEVATIONFRONT GROUND GRADE 150' 989.6 6.089 1" = DRIVEWAY 0030343.00 G 150' 983.0TYPICAL LOT 0 . 0 . 1 6 9 8 99 9 9 VARIES LO 980.00' 2.989 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NUMBER: TO PROPOSED GRADE. ELEVATIONS AND HOUSE STYLES SHOWN ARE ENGINEERS SUGGESTED INDICATES A CUSTOM HOUSE PAD WHICH HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETELY GRADED OR PREPAREDDESIGN FOR CUSTOM LOTS AND SHOULD BE VERIFIED WITH THE DEVELOPER. THE NUMBER IN THE PARENTHESIS INDICATES THE SOG = SLAB ON GRADE UNIT.SOG (1) = SLAB ON GRADE UNIT GRADED FOR 0.70' OF DIFFERENCE FROM SLAB FLOOR ELEVATION TO FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE FLOOR.SOG (2) = SLAB ON GRADE UNIT GRADED FOR 1.30' OF DIFFERENCE FROM SLAB FLOOR ELEVATION TO FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE FLOOR. TO FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE DOOR. NUMBER OF BLOCKS THAT THE GARAGE IS DROPPED. EACH BLOCK=8". R = RAMBLER, GRADED FOR 8.2' OF DIFFERENCE FROM BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION GRADE AT THE LOOKOUT TO THE FRONT GROUND GRADE AT THE GARAGE DOOR.WO = FULL BASEMENT WALKOUT GRADED FOR 8.7' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE REAR GROUND GRADE AT THE WALKOUT TO THE FRONT GROUND GRADE AT THE GARAGE DOOR.SE = SPLIT ENTRY GRADED FOR 4.0' OF DIFFERENCE FROM BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION TO THE FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE DOOR.SE WO = SPLIT ENTRY WALKOUT, GRADED FOR 4.5' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATION AT THE REAR OF THE PAD TO THE FRONT GARAGE SLAB ELEVATION AT FRONT OF HOUSE.NOTE:1. LO = FULL BASEMENT LOOKOUT GRADED FOR 5.4' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE REAR GROUND TWO ROWS OF SILT FENCE (SEPARATED BY 8 FEET); ORTOPSOIL BERM AND FIBER LOGS (STABILIZE BERM WITH MULCH). SILT FENCE AND A TOPSOIL BERM (STABILIZE BERM WITH MULCH); ORSILT FENCE AND FIBER LOGS; OR DRAINAGE ARROW CUSTOM 3.1.3.2.3.3.3.4. ALL CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN TO FINISHED SURFACE/GUTTER GRADESCONFORM TO THE CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE'S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREET &AND LAYOUT.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES ANDTOPOGRAPHICAL FEATURES WITH THE OWNERS AND FIELD-VERIFY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES ORVARIATIONS FROM PLAN.ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL RULES.ALL SILT FENCE AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SHALL BE IN-PLACE PRIOR TO ANYCOVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. EXISTING SILT FENCE ON-SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND ORSHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT.ALL STREETS DISTURBED DURING WORKING HOURS MUST BE CLEANED AT THE END OF EACHWORKING DAY. A ROCK ENTRANCE TO THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED ACCORDING TO DETAILSTO REDUCE TRACKING OF DIRT ONTO PUBLIC STREETS.WITHIN 50 FEET OF SURFACE WATERS. REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS COULD INCLUDE:OF THE SURFACE WATER. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST. TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALLUTILITY CONSTRUCTION.REFER TO THE SITE PLAN/RECORD PLAT FOR MOST CURRENT HORIZONTAL SITE DIMENSIONSPOSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED AT ALL TIMES.EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL VIABLE TURF OR GROUNDREMOVED AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. IT IS OFEXTREME IMPORTANCE TO BE AWARE OF CURRENT FIELD CONDITIONS WITH RESPECT TOEROSION CONTROL. TEMPORARY PONDING, DIKES, HAY BALES, ETC., REQUIRED BY THE CITYREDUNDANT PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS ARE NECESSARY WHEN SOIL DISTURBANCE ISREDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO DISTURBING WITHIN 50 FEET OVERALL GRADING & 2.3.4.6.2.3.4. GRADING & DRAINAGE NOTES 1.5.1. EROSION CONTROL NOTES EROSION CONTROL PLAN | | | H | O P | | | | F | S | H F S O | P 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 | | | | | F H S O| P | | | | |OUTLOT D F H|S O P (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 | | F | S | | | HFS O | P | | PhoneFax | X | | HF S |F O PS | | 25 X | F | SF S | F S | H OF S P | X | | F S | | X |F S HF S O | P 13 | 17 IRRIGATION |1 19 20 2 18 |F OUTLOT C X 3 S 1716 | 4 | 5 H 16 |F O PS 615 | 8191 7 |17.50+87 X 13 0 8 |2 15 7 9 1 5 1 2 14 F 10 788 S 11 2 13 OUTLOT C 12 2 2 14 9 7 C 22 TE E RT S 3 22 6 14 13.0 F . 70 1. 13+S 9400 120 6 +7 22 51 F+ 1211 S 22 C T E 9 E TR 9 S 2 12 771 21 OUTLOT E 2036 13 5 19 1 1118 F 17 27 S 35 16 SEE SHEET 1414 1 10 2 5 6 C F 23 8 12 4 T 7 S E 20 1 1 E R 9G13 T S15 34 T E E R 15 T 10 8 S 3 16 15 COTTAGE GROVE, MN 3 33 24 1 19 7 5 6 7 7 16 7 1 9 17 1 11 A 6 T 14 E32 E 8 12 R 2 T 1 18 1 SI 517 25 8 MISSISSIPPI LANDING T F E S 18E 7 R 13 4 T 10S 19 7 31 6 4 1 1 6 18 7 1 9 26 1 12 17 1 20 12 1 3 D. 3 8 9 3 T 7 .30 + E 0 E 8 6 0 R 3 211119 T 5 + S 07 9 27 1 16 1 1 22 8 5 529 1 20 10 F S 15 2328 4 9 2 1 14 4 7 7 2428 9 21 29 6 3 6 8 4 1 1 7 3 SEE SHEET 2 827 1 5 30 22 12 41257 7 C 1 T 0 E E 7 4 R F 31 T S 3 S 11 7 1 26 32 1023 2 3 12 1 9 6 925 F 33 1324 S 6 2 1 8 3 8 34 G 14 6 2 F T S 7E F LICENSE NO. S E 5 R 7 TOUTLOT F S 1 35 154 1 SF 71 A 6 T 1 E E3 R T S 16 22 1 MINNESOTA 3 1 . 6 2 1 2 17 4 6 6 21 + 2 0 12/29/21 0 202 1 B F 18 ET 1 E S R DT 1 S 24 20 T E E 5 R 6 18 T 19 S 9 19 1 17 RYAN M. BLUHMDATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF 4 1822 9 6 17 8 18 19 17 16 23 2 19 F GAS TANKS S 16 16 24 7 1 20 8 15 15 25 8 6 14 1 2615 7 2 21 9 14 13 7 27 5 1 F S 28 B14 11 T 7 E E R8 T13 S 22 6 29 4 1 6 13 30 G 5 U 0 P 26 0 .1 12 0 30 923 31 1 + 6 F 4 1 S G U P 12 11 S A G 25 SEE SHEET 1 E 8 G U P T10 24 E 3 E 2 R T S S 1 A 1 11 10 G 5 25 13 2 11 4 ---- 10 F 9 3 S OUTLOT G G 14 T EE 26 EE 1E RE E T E 4 EE S 12EE 9 3 EE E E EE EE EE 8EE EE 11E E 15E EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 2 27 D 4 T E8 E R T FS S 7 01 F F 0 F .S S 16 S 3 0 1 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 0 28 + PLASTIC PIPE IN WATER 7 1 6 F 30 SF 29 S 17 5 9 X 6 X SCALE 1"=30' 11 X 2 5 31 SEE SHEET F 20' WIDE ASSUMED ACCESS 18 SF 32 4 S 1 F S 5 4 3 6 9 X 5 2 8 F 5 1 S 19 0 1 6 PREPARED FOR: X 00. 00+1626 136 X E X 5 7 5 T 4 E . E R 20 2 T POHF S OH 7 PS F TEERTS 4 4 F 6 T 50 E .E R T+ 6 S 7 3 + F 3 S 6 H 0 0 5. O 21 1 50 10 0 P + 1 9 7 9 . 4 11 5 +F 141516 13 7 S 4 12 3 22 5 2 F S F S E T E E 8 R SF T S F 23 F HS S O 3 P 5 4 1 10 247 23 6 5 F S 2 5 25 3 10 F F H T S E O E P R T S F S 2 F S 1 5 F X S 1 H H O P 0 O 0 5 P 0 F . . S 0 S L 0 I OUTLOT I A + R T 0 5 D U SX O L A C G Y E R G ..... 12/29/21 S A G H H T O O L P T U O SEE SHEET ..... S A G INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: ... 15' OR 30' 150.000009' DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-GDP01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 02/05/2020 GD25AGD25A LAST REVISED: OF 150' Common Ground Alliance 12/29/21 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com 19 DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 100' AT GARAGE DOOR LOT CORNER ELEVATIONLOT NUMBERREAR GROUND GRADE ATLOOKOUTMINIMUM BASEMENTFLOOR ELEVATIONFRONT GROUND GRADE 50' TOP AND BOTTOM OF RETAINING WALLTREE LINETREE PROTECTION FENCETURF REINFORCEMENT MATWETLAND LINEWETLAND FILLWETLAND BUFFERWETLAND BUFFER LIMITSWETLAND BUFFER MONUMENT PROPERTY LINESOIL BORING LOCATIONINDEX CONTOURINTERVAL CONTOURSPOT ELEVATIONHIGH/LOW POINTCL-CL ELEVATIONFLOW DIRECTIONEMERGENCY OVERFLOWPROPOSED STREET PROFILE GRADESTORM SEWERRETAINING WALL (MODULAR BLOCK)GRADING LIMITSSILT FENCESILT FENCE-POST GRADINGHEAVY DUTY SILT FENCEREDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLINLET PROTECTIONEROSION CONTROL CHECKS/BIOROLLSROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEEROSION CONTROL BLANKETPOND NORMAL WATER LEVELPOND ACCESS MAINTENANCE BENCHDO NOT DISTURB 989.6 6.089 1" = DRIVEWAY 0030343.00 G 50' 983.0TYPICAL LOT 99 991.0 986.0 02 88 900.00900.00CL-CL900.00TW=XXX.XX HP/LPBW=XXX.XX VARIES GLSF 99 RSC HDSF X.XX% 0.00% POST-SF LO 980.00' 2.989 PROPOSED E.O.F. DND NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NUMBER: PLAN TO PROPOSED GRADE. ELEVATIONS AND HOUSE STYLES SHOWN ARE ENGINEERS SUGGESTED INDICATES A CUSTOM HOUSE PAD WHICH HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETELY GRADED OR PREPAREDDESIGN FOR CUSTOM LOTS AND SHOULD BE VERIFIED WITH THE DEVELOPER. THE NUMBER IN THE PARENTHESIS INDICATES THE SOG = SLAB ON GRADE UNIT.SOG (1) = SLAB ON GRADE UNIT GRADED FOR 0.70' OF DIFFERENCE FROM SLAB FLOOR ELEVATION TO FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE FLOOR.SOG (2) = SLAB ON GRADE UNIT GRADED FOR 1.30' OF DIFFERENCE FROM SLAB FLOOR ELEVATION TO FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE FLOOR. TO FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE DOOR. NUMBER OF BLOCKS THAT THE GARAGE IS DROPPED. EACH BLOCK=8". R = RAMBLER, GRADED FOR 8.2' OF DIFFERENCE FROM BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION GRADE AT THE LOOKOUT TO THE FRONT GROUND GRADE AT THE GARAGE DOOR.WO = FULL BASEMENT WALKOUT GRADED FOR 8.7' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE REAR GROUND GRADE AT THE WALKOUT TO THE FRONT GROUND GRADE AT THE GARAGE DOOR.SE = SPLIT ENTRY GRADED FOR 4.0' OF DIFFERENCE FROM BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION TO THE FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE DOOR.SE WO = SPLIT ENTRY WALKOUT, GRADED FOR 4.5' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATION AT THE REAR OF THE PAD TO THE FRONT GARAGE SLAB ELEVATION AT FRONT OF HOUSE.NOTE:1. LO = FULL BASEMENT LOOKOUT GRADED FOR 5.4' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE REAR GROUND 02 88 900.00 99 DRAINAGE ARROW STO CUSTOM EXISTING GRADING & EROSION CONTROL LEGEND & EROSION CONTROL PRELIMINARY GRADING | | S H A O | GP H6083 X60796078 O O | F P | 6070 6077 60806076 | 60726073 | | X H O| P | 6065 | 60716074 6067 H | O O F P | 606660686069 | H | O P | | | |60646063 H | OO F P H | O P 6062 | | | | 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 | H O | P H OO| F P | | 60506051 | H | O 6052 P6053 6054 21 (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 | 6057 | H O P | H O P O | F | 60596061 PhoneFax |H O P 60556060 |6056 | | 60366038603960406058 1 | 6049 SEE SHEET | FO | H O 60416042 PROPOSED 21" CULVERTIE = 709.95 P | PROPOSED RETAINING WALL (TYP) | | | | | O F F SFS FS FS | SF 16 SF 60376043 SF 6035 F S 60486047 M 0 F 0 .0 0 0 F 0 S + 0 1 0 1 SF O F 6033 F S 5 6 00. 00+7 15 F 8 5 S 1 M F SF A TE ERT S S F A S O 5 FG 5 60456046 WATER PUMP 6009 COTTAGE GROVE, MN 60086007 F S MF % S F6044 5 . 1 F 4 S 0 S 1 A X O G MISSISSIPPI LANDING F 4 4 5 % 0.7 F S F F S S F S XF S M 2 XF 5 F SS A O G F 6010 F S F S F 6219 S X60126011 3 F IE= 709.67 S% 2.5 M 2 F F SS 41257 2 6018 A 3 B 0 F O S G 5 F 1 F S T E X F E S X R T F S M S F 2 3 F LICENSE NO. F S S S A %4.3 O G F F X S F X S MINNESOTA 6020 621662176215 M 39 F TO REMAIN F 12/29/21 EXISTING 48" CULVERTS 2 3 S 5 0 F 1 S F X S S A O XF G F S F RYAN M. BLUHMDATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF S %4. 6022 4 1 A T M E F X E F 62186214F SF R S XS T 4 S F S A S O G F F S 4 5 6 0 M X 1 F 1 X 5 SF SF OUTLOT B S A G FO OUTLOT A M XF F S %% % 8 4.6%9 9 . . . F 4534 61886187S 5 6 8 5 0 F 1 S S 45324533M AF 0 O PROPOSED 24" CULVERTIE= 707.52 XG 0 F. 0 45364537 4539 0 + 0 6 0 0 F 5 0 .S 0 0 0 F 6 S + 0 5 45684566 1 M 2 3 F X F PONDBOT 706.0NWL 708.0HWL 710.9EOF 711.5BERM 712.0 S 4 6 4571 S453545444569 0REMOVE EXISTING CULVERTS 1 A G FO WALL (TYP) EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 F 4572 S M F F S 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 WATER PUMP X45434542456745404562 F 4574 4570S F PROPOSED RETAINING 4580 45774573 S F S 1 MS F 7 A F 0 FS FS 1 SFF GS FOS SF 458445824575 F 1 S 45254523 6 4515 45884576 4578 F S X M 14 F F S 5020 502150195022 FO 4589 4587 F S 4581 PREPARED FOR: 45834579 S 4409 A O 8 F F S FM 0 G 4591FS 4590 1 H F S O X P 45924593 5018 458545864512 F S 45244522 43845013 4446444744454444 F S M F SF XS A 2 F FOGF 9 S H44724471 0 S 6 1 4473O P 50175016 5014 F F S S 5015 5012 FM X F 4503S 45044502 4506 S F AS F 44994495 FOGS44484449 SF H 4462F 4463S 0 45004501O 1 44614464 F 1 4475PS 44744476 SAG GAS X H SFPO FS44654468 4454445344504452S 4451AF FGXS H PO S H SF 43974396OA XP HGS X4466PO4416 446044584459 S A G 448144804477 H PO X 44564455 1 F SH S SAOA P GG H O P X S X F F 4497ASX O S4479 3 H FG HXO XP 6 S A O G X 1 H P O5004500350055002 1 P 1 X X X 15 F 44694470S S 44984496A X FG H S XOH P 448444854482O P X 4457X FS S A G H O P S F H SAH OSO A GP 448944904491PG X H O..... P 4486 4487 2 1 20 12/29/21 1 X S A G F H O S P RE= 706.0 X 44834488S A 24" IE= 701.0 G H O P FF S S S S AA G..... G 4 H O 6 P CONSTRUCT STMH F SS GA OVER EXISTING 48" EXIST. 48" IE= 698.56 H O INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: PSF F S SEE SHEET H FO P S F S H O P ... 5' 50' F S F S OR 5 F 10' 6 S F S DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-GDP02.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 02/05/2020 GD25AGD25A LAST REVISED: OF 150' 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance 20 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 100' AT GARAGE DOOR LOT CORNER ELEVATIONLOT NUMBERREAR GROUND GRADE ATLOOKOUTMINIMUM BASEMENTFLOOR ELEVATIONFRONT GROUND GRADE 50' 989.6 6.089 1" = DRIVEWAY 0030343.00 G 50' 983.0TYPICAL LOT 99 991.0 986.0 VARIES WETLAND LINEWETLAND FILLWETLAND BUFFERWETLAND BUFFER LIMITSWETLAND BUFFER MONUMENT SOIL BORING LOCATIONSPOT ELEVATIONCL-CL ELEVATIONTOP AND BOTTOM OF RETAINING WALLSTORM SEWERTREE LINETREE PROTECTION FENCEGRADING LIMITSSILT FENCESILT FENCE-POST GRADINGTURF REINFORCEMENT MAT PROPERTY LINEINDEX CONTOURINTERVAL CONTOURHIGH/LOW POINTFLOW DIRECTIONEMERGENCY OVERFLOWPROPOSED STREET PROFILE GRADERETAINING WALL (MODULAR BLOCK)HEAVY DUTY SILT FENCEREDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLINLET PROTECTIONEROSION CONTROL CHECKS/BIOROLLSROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEEROSION CONTROL BLANKETPOND NORMAL WATER LEVELPOND ACCESS MAINTENANCE BENCHDO NOT DISTURB LO 980.00' 2.989 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NUMBER: PLAN TO PROPOSED GRADE. ELEVATIONS AND HOUSE STYLES SHOWN ARE ENGINEERS SUGGESTED INDICATES A CUSTOM HOUSE PAD WHICH HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETELY GRADED OR PREPAREDDESIGN FOR CUSTOM LOTS AND SHOULD BE VERIFIED WITH THE DEVELOPER. 02 THE NUMBER IN THE PARENTHESIS INDICATES THE 88 TW=XXX.XX 900.00HP/LP900.00CL-CL900.00BW=XXX.XX SF 99 GL RSC HDSF SOG = SLAB ON GRADE UNIT.SOG (1) = SLAB ON GRADE UNIT GRADED FOR 0.70' OF DIFFERENCE FROM SLAB FLOOR ELEVATION TO FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE FLOOR.SOG (2) = SLAB ON GRADE UNIT GRADED FOR 1.30' OF DIFFERENCE FROM SLAB FLOOR ELEVATION TO FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE FLOOR. TO FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE DOOR. NUMBER OF BLOCKS THAT THE GARAGE IS DROPPED. EACH BLOCK=8". R = RAMBLER, GRADED FOR 8.2' OF DIFFERENCE FROM BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION GRADE AT THE LOOKOUT TO THE FRONT GROUND GRADE AT THE GARAGE DOOR.WO = FULL BASEMENT WALKOUT GRADED FOR 8.7' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE REAR GROUND GRADE AT THE WALKOUT TO THE FRONT GROUND GRADE AT THE GARAGE DOOR.SE = SPLIT ENTRY GRADED FOR 4.0' OF DIFFERENCE FROM BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION TO THE FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE DOOR.SE WO = SPLIT ENTRY WALKOUT, GRADED FOR 4.5' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATION AT THE REAR OF THE PAD TO THE FRONT GARAGE SLAB ELEVATION AT FRONT OF HOUSE.NOTE:1. X.XX%LO = FULL BASEMENT LOOKOUT GRADED FOR 5.4' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE REAR GROUND 0.00% POST-SF PROPOSED E.O.F. DND DRAINAGE ARROW CUSTOM & EROSION CONTROL PRELIMINARY GRADING 02 88 900.00 99 STO EXISTING GRADING & EROSION CONTROL LEGEND 21SEE SHEET % 10 4 . 7 F S D T E 7 E 4 9 R T 51545175 S FS 5197F FS 6 4 S5174SF 5 8 1 521752245223 0 52155216 F 16 0 S . 0 5176 51495177 0 1 52215229 + 52015198521452185241 52045219 5109 1 F S 513251335135 522852225230 5107 5202519952005203 5245524052425239 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 F S % F 9 . 5136 6 5098S 5100 50995090 50685069506750795066 51485178 SF F S 5108 F51475146 S 51105097 5111 5030 1 5077 F SF 50615060S 5080 50385035 50917513 SF 50885089 % 5112.4 507250825081 F50765071 1 S 5238 17 502150195022 51275129 524652445243 5231(952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 52265232 52055206 5093 5125 51315126513451375138 F 7512 5 S 51235122 50255024 52075213521052255227 52125211 52095208 50505058 % 6 5044. 5045 7 50835087508651285130 505950495057 5092 5096 5031 502750265028 PhoneFax 50945095512451165121 50345054 5053% 7517 5 50705075. 503650735074 5037 1 50555056 50855084 F 5052 S 5051 18 7518 50485117 51205118 50477519% 504675207516 1 . 8 5115 5113 51195114 19 6 F S 70417040 7042 7043 7039 19% 8 . 8 SEE SHEET 7050 70447047 704970487032 F S 70457046 7028 7058 20 7052 % 6 . 70577051 8 7073 7031 7030 F H S O P COTTAGE GROVE, MN 7062 21 7053 H706470567063705570547074 O P MISSISSIPPI LANDING 7060 7061 F HS O P 7067 70597065 3 7066 1 1 7068 6 7069 71757178 4 .H O 4 P 0 + 22 3 71777176 1 4 1 5 F S H 71807190 O P % 3 . 8 7192 7191 71897179 41257 F S 23 7181 7183 7182 % 8 . 8 3 4 5 7188 7185 1 LICENSE NO. 7184 F S 24 7368 73677366 MINNESOTA % 1 %. 0 . 5 6 12/29/21 F S 736373647362 RYAN M. BLUHMDATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF 73757365 2 5 25 % % 9 3 . 88 . 7355 3 F F 7356 S 7361 T E 7383 73597360 E 7381 R F S T S 7382 X 73487345 7354735073497346 F 2 S % 7353 2 F . S 7352 4 7347 1 S 7358 5 73577351A G X 7336 73427344 7482 7326 7337 F S 73417338 SF 7340 AS74917499 G 23 X 1 F S 733973257323 7501 7500 F S 7477747974837485 747474767484 S A7488 G7306X F S 0 SEE SHEET 0 5 F 0 S . 0 7311 0 73087307.73097310 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 +S S 0 A 5 G L 7459 7471 I 7472 X OUTLOT I A 74607458 7304747074737469 R 74757478 73007457 743974547456 T 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 73037305 D 7302 U O S L A G C X Y 7301 E 7440 R X G 74647462 74617441 7467 7465 7455 7463745174497468 S A G 745374467452 PREPARED FOR: 745074667448 S A G 744274447445 74437447 S A G S A G S A G S A G ..... 12/29/21 ..... INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: ... 5' 50' OR 10' DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-GDP02.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 02/05/2020 GD25AGD25A LAST REVISED: OF 150' 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance 21 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 100' AT GARAGE DOOR LOT CORNER ELEVATIONLOT NUMBERREAR GROUND GRADE ATLOOKOUTMINIMUM BASEMENTFLOOR ELEVATIONFRONT GROUND GRADE 50' 989.6 6.089 1" = DRIVEWAY 0030343.00 G 50' 0 . 3 8 9TYPICAL LOT 99 991.0 986.0 VARIES LO 980.00' 2.989 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NUMBER: PLAN TOP AND BOTTOM OF RETAINING WALLTREE LINETREE PROTECTION FENCETURF REINFORCEMENT MATWETLAND LINEWETLAND FILLWETLAND BUFFERWETLAND BUFFER LIMITSWETLAND BUFFER MONUMENT PROPERTY LINESOIL BORING LOCATIONINDEX CONTOURINTERVAL CONTOURSPOT ELEVATIONHIGH/LOW POINTCL-CL ELEVATIONFLOW DIRECTIONEMERGENCY OVERFLOWPROPOSED STREET PROFILE GRADESTORM SEWERRETAINING WALL (MODULAR BLOCK)GRADING LIMITSSILT FENCESILT FENCE-POST GRADINGHEAVY DUTY SILT FENCEREDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLINLET PROTECTIONEROSION CONTROL CHECKS/BIOROLLSROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEEROSION CONTROL BLANKETPOND NORMAL WATER LEVELPOND ACCESS MAINTENANCE BENCHDO NOT DISTURB TO PROPOSED GRADE. ELEVATIONS AND HOUSE STYLES SHOWN ARE ENGINEERS SUGGESTED INDICATES A CUSTOM HOUSE PAD WHICH HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETELY GRADED OR PREPAREDDESIGN FOR CUSTOM LOTS AND SHOULD BE VERIFIED WITH THE DEVELOPER. THE NUMBER IN THE PARENTHESIS INDICATES THE SOG = SLAB ON GRADE UNIT.SOG (1) = SLAB ON GRADE UNIT GRADED FOR 0.70' OF DIFFERENCE FROM SLAB FLOOR ELEVATION TO FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE FLOOR.SOG (2) = SLAB ON GRADE UNIT GRADED FOR 1.30' OF DIFFERENCE FROM SLAB FLOOR ELEVATION TO FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE FLOOR. TO FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE DOOR. NUMBER OF BLOCKS THAT THE GARAGE IS DROPPED. EACH BLOCK=8". R = RAMBLER, GRADED FOR 8.2' OF DIFFERENCE FROM BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION GRADE AT THE LOOKOUT TO THE FRONT GROUND GRADE AT THE GARAGE DOOR.WO = FULL BASEMENT WALKOUT GRADED FOR 8.7' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE REAR GROUND GRADE AT THE WALKOUT TO THE FRONT GROUND GRADE AT THE GARAGE DOOR.SE = SPLIT ENTRY GRADED FOR 4.0' OF DIFFERENCE FROM BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION TO THE FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE DOOR.SE WO = SPLIT ENTRY WALKOUT, GRADED FOR 4.5' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATION AT THE REAR OF THE PAD TO THE FRONT GARAGE SLAB ELEVATION AT FRONT OF HOUSE.NOTE:1. LO = FULL BASEMENT LOOKOUT GRADED FOR 5.4' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE REAR GROUND DRAINAGE ARROW CUSTOM 02 88 900.00900.00CL-CL900.00TW=XXX.XX HP/LPBW=XXX.XX GLSF 99 RSC HDSF X.XX%& EROSION CONTROL 0.00% POST-SF PRELIMINARY GRADING PROPOSED E.O.F. DND 02 88 900.00 99 STO EXISTING GRADING & EROSION CONTROL LEGEND 24 22SEE SHEET 6115 F S 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 % 13 3 6117. 6116 7 EXISTING CULVERT TO REMAIN 4 1 F % S 0 . 7 8 % 12 2 . 6 4 (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 % 6 . 8 11 % F 9 S. 6 12 C % PhoneFax 1 9 . T 5 7 E 10 E 3 1 R T S % 2 . 11 6 % F 2 . S 9 7 % 9 . 10 5 % 3 . 8 6 8 F S % 9 0 . 6 2 13 1 % 6 . 7 8 % 8 1 . 6 F S 3 5 % 0 14 . % 7 8 3 6 . 7 % 3 7 . 5 6 F S% 8 . 5 15 % 6 6 . 1 % 9 . 5 A %T 2 E 4.7 E 6 5 R 5 T COTTAGE GROVE, MN S F 16 % S 8 . % 3 5 0 . 6 % 6 4 . 5 MISSISSIPPI LANDING 17 % 7 . % 5 21 5 . 3 6 6 F S 18 % 4 % 4.8 5 . % 3 6 . 3 20 3 3 F S 19 %9.5 %5 6 1 .% 21 . 6 19 4 41257 % 5.5 % 3 8 . 2 3 % 20 3 . 4 F 18 2 S C 3.4% % 04 . 6 LICENSE NO. 7% T 0 . E 3 E 2%4. 5 R 17 MINNESOTA T S 23 2 2 % F S 3 .12/29/21 2 1 %5.8 FS 3 16 6 24 RYAN M. BLUHMDATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF % 1. 4 1% 8 . 5 % 3 . 15 3 25 2 6 % 3 . 4 85 6 1 % 95 6 . 06 14 6 % 26 2 6 A T. EE 1 RT S 1 4 +1 0.00 0 2 % 3 % . 13 2 7. 4 27 % 3 . % 19 5 24 5 % % . 7% 6 4. %. 9 3. 03 . 6 12 4 5 % 1 4 . 5 28 % G B U 3 . T T 1 E E 11 R T S 10% 0 . 5 4 9 6 29 % 8 SEE SHEET SEE SHEET 7 4 . 1 4 1 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 30 5 % 7 .7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 5 0 0 .1 0 0 31+ 1 4 3 1 % 7 . 3 2 32 % 4 . % 24 . 0 33 PREPARED FOR: E 2 34%1 7 T . 4 E 3 3935 E 3837 36 R T % 9 %. 2 S 9 1 . 5 % 8 . 1 1 % 1 4 . 6 % 7 . % % %7 % 6 9 6 .13 .6 2 . . 4 4 6 3 0%% 1 9 . 0 . 8 8 % 3 . 93 % 6 87 7 . 9 3 B T EERTS 14 % 7 . 1 8 % 5 . % 8 % 5 . 4 8 12 . F 0 S % 1 %% % 8 . 00 9 ... 8 515751565159 800 9.4% 11 11 F 15 S 10% 4 . 7 ..... F S 12/29/21 D T E 7 E 4 9 R T 51545175 S F S F5197FS 6 4 S 5 5174SF 8 5223 01 5217521552165224 F 16 S 0..... . 0 5176 51495177 0 1 52215229 + 5241 520152045198521952145218 1 5109 F S INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: 5135 513251335230 52285222 5107 519952005203 5202 5245524052425239 F S % F .9 5136S 6 50985100 50995090 50685069506750795066 5178 5148 F S F S 5108 5147 F5146 S 511151105097 5030 1 5077 F SF... S 50615060 5080 50385035 5' 50917513 50' SF 50885089 % 5112 4 . 50765071507250825081 SF 1 5238 17 OR 50215019 5022 51275129 524652445243 52315232 5226 52055206 5093 5125 5131 10' 5126513451375138 F7512 5 S 51235122 50255024521352105225 52075227 521252095211 5208 50505058 % 6 . 50455044 7 51285130 508350875086 505950495057 5092 5096 50275031 50265028 509551165121 50945124 50345054 20SEE SHEET 5053 7517% 5 50705075. 5036503750735074 1 5056 5055 50855084 F 5052 S 5051 18 7518 50485117 51205118 % 504750467519 75207516 1 . DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: 8 51155113 51195114 N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-GDP02.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 02/05/2020 GD25AGD25A LAST REVISED: OF 150' 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance 22 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 100' AT GARAGE DOOR LOT CORNER ELEVATIONLOT NUMBERREAR GROUND GRADE ATLOOKOUTMINIMUM BASEMENTFLOOR ELEVATIONFRONT GROUND GRADE 50' 989.6 6.089 1" = DRIVEWAY 0030343.00 G 50' 983.0TYPICAL LOT 0 . 0 . 1 6 9 8 99 9 9 VARIES LO 980.00' 2.989 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NUMBER: PLAN TOP AND BOTTOM OF RETAINING WALLTREE LINETREE PROTECTION FENCETURF REINFORCEMENT MATWETLAND LINEWETLAND FILLWETLAND BUFFERWETLAND BUFFER LIMITSWETLAND BUFFER MONUMENT PROPERTY LINESOIL BORING LOCATIONINDEX CONTOURINTERVAL CONTOURSPOT ELEVATIONHIGH/LOW POINTCL-CL ELEVATIONFLOW DIRECTIONEMERGENCY OVERFLOWPROPOSED STREET PROFILE GRADESTORM SEWERRETAINING WALL (MODULAR BLOCK)GRADING LIMITSSILT FENCESILT FENCE-POST GRADINGHEAVY DUTY SILT FENCEREDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLINLET PROTECTIONEROSION CONTROL CHECKS/BIOROLLSROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEEROSION CONTROL BLANKETPOND NORMAL WATER LEVELPOND ACCESS MAINTENANCE BENCHDO NOT DISTURB TO PROPOSED GRADE. ELEVATIONS AND HOUSE STYLES SHOWN ARE ENGINEERS SUGGESTED INDICATES A CUSTOM HOUSE PAD WHICH HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETELY GRADED OR PREPAREDDESIGN FOR CUSTOM LOTS AND SHOULD BE VERIFIED WITH THE DEVELOPER. THE NUMBER IN THE PARENTHESIS INDICATES THE SOG = SLAB ON GRADE UNIT.SOG (1) = SLAB ON GRADE UNIT GRADED FOR 0.70' OF DIFFERENCE FROM SLAB FLOOR ELEVATION TO FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE FLOOR.SOG (2) = SLAB ON GRADE UNIT GRADED FOR 1.30' OF DIFFERENCE FROM SLAB FLOOR ELEVATION TO FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE FLOOR. TO FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE DOOR. NUMBER OF BLOCKS THAT THE GARAGE IS DROPPED. EACH BLOCK=8". R = RAMBLER, GRADED FOR 8.2' OF DIFFERENCE FROM BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION GRADE AT THE LOOKOUT TO THE FRONT GROUND GRADE AT THE GARAGE DOOR.WO = FULL BASEMENT WALKOUT GRADED FOR 8.7' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE REAR GROUND GRADE AT THE WALKOUT TO THE FRONT GROUND GRADE AT THE GARAGE DOOR.SE = SPLIT ENTRY GRADED FOR 4.0' OF DIFFERENCE FROM BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION TO THE FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE DOOR.SE WO = SPLIT ENTRY WALKOUT, GRADED FOR 4.5' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATION AT THE REAR OF THE PAD TO THE FRONT GARAGE SLAB ELEVATION AT FRONT OF HOUSE.NOTE:1. LO = FULL BASEMENT LOOKOUT GRADED FOR 5.4' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE REAR GROUND DRAINAGE ARROW CUSTOM 02 88 900.00900.00CL-CL900.00TW=XXX.XX HP/LPBW=XXX.XX GLSF 99 RSC HDSF X.XX%& EROSION CONTROL 0.00% POST-SF PRELIMINARY GRADING PROPOSED E.O.F. DND 02 88 900.00 99 STO EXISTING GRADING & EROSION CONTROL LEGEND 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 PhoneFax H O P | H | O P | | | | | H| O P | | | | | X | H O | P | | X | | | H O | P | X | | | COTTAGE GROVE, MN | H | O PX | | | | | X MISSISSIPPI LANDING | H O P | | | X | | | H O | P | X | | | 6123 | F H S | OX P | | | | |X |F H S O P| | | X | 41257 | | H OF | PS | X | | | 25 F S | H O| PX F | S | | LICENSE NO. | | X H O | P | |POND 3BOT 705.0NWL 714.5HWL 718.1EOF 719.5BERM 720.0 MINNESOTA | F |S | H O P | | | SEE SHEET 12/29/21 OUTLOT C | | |F H S O P | | RYAN M. BLUHMDATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF | | | | H O P| F S | | | | | H O P| | | F S | | | H OF S P| | | | | | H F OS | P | | | | | H | O P | | F S | | | H | O P | 6121 | | | 1 | 2 H| F O PS | |5 | | F S | 20 H| O P | | | | % EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 |3 . | 8 | | F | % S% 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 2 8 |1 . . 68 | 3 | 19 %7 2. 6 % 1 . 6 7 F 1 S % 3 PREPARED FOR: 6. 6 8 1 % 6 . 6 4 % 5 F 2 3 . S 1 6 18 % % 2 2 .. 7 6 4 OUTLOT C 6 1 F S % 1 4 W/FOREBAYOUTLET 714.0 INF BASIN 2BOT 712.5HWL 716.3EOF 716.5BERM 717.0.1 17 8 9 1 % 3 3 . D 7 . 7 0 % 0 1 + . F 9 T S 4 1 E F S E F R S T S 16 % 7 . 5 0 % 1 2 . 9 F S 22 5 1 PROPOSEDHWL 713.8% 7 . 6 15 23 F S 14 ..... 9 12/29/21 24 6115F S % 13 3 6117. 6116 7 ..... EXISTING CULVERT TO REMAIN 4 1 F % S 0 . 7 INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: 8 % 12 2 . 6 4 % 6 . 8 11 % F... 9 S. 5' 6 50' 12 OR C % 1 9 . T 10' 5 7 E 10 3 E 1 R T S % 2 . 11 6 % F 2 . S 9 7 % 9 .21SEE SHEET 10 5 % 3 . 8 6 8 F S % 9 0 . 6 DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: 2 13 1 N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-GDP02.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 02/05/2020 GD25AGD25A LAST REVISED: OF 150' 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance 23 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 100' AT GARAGE DOOR LOT CORNER ELEVATIONLOT NUMBERREAR GROUND GRADE ATLOOKOUTMINIMUM BASEMENTFLOOR ELEVATIONFRONT GROUND GRADE 50' 989.6 6.089 1" = DRIVEWAY 0030343.00 G 50' 983.0TYPICAL LOT 0 . 1 9 99 9 986.0 VARIES LO 980.00' 2.989 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NUMBER: PLAN TOP AND BOTTOM OF RETAINING WALLTREE LINETREE PROTECTION FENCETURF REINFORCEMENT MATWETLAND LINEWETLAND FILLWETLAND BUFFERWETLAND BUFFER LIMITSWETLAND BUFFER MONUMENT PROPERTY LINESOIL BORING LOCATIONINDEX CONTOURINTERVAL CONTOURSPOT ELEVATIONHIGH/LOW POINTCL-CL ELEVATIONFLOW DIRECTIONEMERGENCY OVERFLOWPROPOSED STREET PROFILE GRADESTORM SEWERRETAINING WALL (MODULAR BLOCK)GRADING LIMITSSILT FENCESILT FENCE-POST GRADINGHEAVY DUTY SILT FENCEREDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLINLET PROTECTIONEROSION CONTROL CHECKS/BIOROLLSROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEEROSION CONTROL BLANKETPOND NORMAL WATER LEVELPOND ACCESS MAINTENANCE BENCHDO NOT DISTURB TO PROPOSED GRADE. ELEVATIONS AND HOUSE STYLES SHOWN ARE ENGINEERS SUGGESTED INDICATES A CUSTOM HOUSE PAD WHICH HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETELY GRADED OR PREPAREDDESIGN FOR CUSTOM LOTS AND SHOULD BE VERIFIED WITH THE DEVELOPER. THE NUMBER IN THE PARENTHESIS INDICATES THE SOG = SLAB ON GRADE UNIT.SOG (1) = SLAB ON GRADE UNIT GRADED FOR 0.70' OF DIFFERENCE FROM SLAB FLOOR ELEVATION TO FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE FLOOR.SOG (2) = SLAB ON GRADE UNIT GRADED FOR 1.30' OF DIFFERENCE FROM SLAB FLOOR ELEVATION TO FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE FLOOR. TO FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE DOOR. NUMBER OF BLOCKS THAT THE GARAGE IS DROPPED. EACH BLOCK=8". R = RAMBLER, GRADED FOR 8.2' OF DIFFERENCE FROM BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION GRADE AT THE LOOKOUT TO THE FRONT GROUND GRADE AT THE GARAGE DOOR.WO = FULL BASEMENT WALKOUT GRADED FOR 8.7' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE REAR GROUND GRADE AT THE WALKOUT TO THE FRONT GROUND GRADE AT THE GARAGE DOOR.SE = SPLIT ENTRY GRADED FOR 4.0' OF DIFFERENCE FROM BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION TO THE FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE DOOR.SE WO = SPLIT ENTRY WALKOUT, GRADED FOR 4.5' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATION AT THE REAR OF THE PAD TO THE FRONT GARAGE SLAB ELEVATION AT FRONT OF HOUSE.NOTE:1. LO = FULL BASEMENT LOOKOUT GRADED FOR 5.4' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE REAR GROUND DRAINAGE ARROW CUSTOM 02 88 900.00900.00CL-CL900.00TW=XXX.XX HP/LPBW=XXX.XX GLSF 99 RSC HDSF X.XX%& EROSION CONTROL 0.00% POST-SF PRELIMINARY GRADING PROPOSED E.O.F. DND 02 88 900.00 99 STO EXISTING GRADING & EROSION CONTROL LEGEND D T E 8 E 4 R T S 8066 8065 7 %%80638064 5 . 4 2 24SEE SHEET . 80788079 3 8080 F 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 S % 2 . 7 3 8068 8077 8069 80678070 28 8176 806280768075 7 8071 F S % FS(952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 1 . 7 6 F S 30 29 % 3 %. 47 . 1 PhoneFax 8061 5 9 X XX X XX 6 XX F S 11 2 5 X 31 X % 5 . 1% 1. 6 % 5 . 8 32 4 1 F S X X 5 4 3 6 % 0 . 2 4 X XF S % 9 5 6 1. % % % 3 % 8 .6 17 . %87 5. 8. .08 0.00 +18 8 6 6 % X X X 9 X .X X X X 4 E 0 6 T % E 16 9726 E.536 HOP 5 4 0.6% R POH 4 POH POH . POH POH T %2 H S O 04 P .F TEERTS + 8 F % 3 7 6 T . E 6 8 E H R O P T COTTAGE GROVE, MN S% 6 8 54 . 0 . 63 7 + 3 % 0 7942 . 7 H % MISSISSIPPI LANDING % % O 2 F 6 P.5 . .S 8.2% 9 21 7 7 0 10 0 . 51 0 5 0 + 1 7 9 9 . 4 5 + 7 H O 11 P 8365 % 6 F .15 1416 7 13 S 3 12 7932 7933 SF 4 5 F S F S % 9 H . 5 O P 41257 56285629 F S 2 F E S 7743 T E 57115630563179297928 E %8 7783 R F 4 S 7568 . T 6 SF S SF 767376727759 FSF S 7567 % SFSF 7558762275607623 FH7619 9 76207691 75697570 .7697 S O 7921 5 P 76957696 7840 7825 LICENSE NO. 5632777977737774 557778277830 75557556756275577561 7776 7780 557555747770 5576 7661 56405635 7738 4 % 773976807737 3 7735 782878377838 .%7551755278437836 7566 77787927 7866 10 3 6 .MINNESOTA 563456365633 6 7658765977827781 76567655 76607657 7629 H7625 F O76217692 7563762675597624 S 7 P 12/29/21 767576687666 7736766976677674 57235638 7835 769376947834 7676 7677 77717824783178267833 7832 776477657769 7654 55795580 7766 RYAN M. BLUHMDATE: 765377677768I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF 755378297772 55787544 7554 774276827681 7628 57265724 768476837679 56395581 6 76897631 769076527678764876507649 5 7565 7741 572776867688 756476277630 F7547 75507546 S H O P 57255584 754575497548 575157525750 56375582 7541 75437542 5747576057465754 F 7687763476357685763676377640763876457644 7639764276417643 S 7632 76477651 7646 3 7633 10 5759 5744574957455748 57385737 H 55855583 O P F S H O 575557565753 SF P SF F55867536 S7535 X 5757 722757587226 7537753975387540 H 5743 57405739 O F 5742 75347533 SP 20 7497 74957496750275037504 H 72407225 O 72317230 X 72285741 P 7482 7229 7242 FH 7241 S O 74917499749875287526 72397238P7532 7527 X SEE SHEET H 752975307531 7501 7500O P 747774797483 7485 H EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 O 72337232 7488 P X 723772347235752375257524 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 72365587 H O P H 559355915592O P 74757478 750975217522 5590558855897510 7273 H H O O P P PREPARED FOR: 7269 7268 750675077508 X X 559655955594 72757274 7270 5597 H72677265 O72667271 7272 P 7260 7262 5598 H O 726172637264 P H S 72587259 AH T G O P O L T U 56025600 56055604 O S AH5601 5599 G O 7257 72557256 56085607P 5603 S AH G O P 5606 72527250 7253 7254 5610 ..... 12/29/21 560972477248 72497251 S A G 72447246 ..... 7243 7245 S A G INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: ... 5' 50' OR 10' DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-GDP02.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 02/05/2020 GD25AGD25A LAST REVISED: OF 150' 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance 24 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 100' AT GARAGE DOOR LOT CORNER ELEVATIONLOT NUMBERREAR GROUND GRADE ATLOOKOUTMINIMUM BASEMENTFLOOR ELEVATIONFRONT GROUND GRADE 50' 989.6 6.089 1" = DRIVEWAY 0030343.00 G 50' 0 . 3 8 9TYPICAL LOT 99 991.0 986.0 VARIES LO 980.00' 2.989 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NUMBER: PLAN TOP AND BOTTOM OF RETAINING WALLTREE LINETREE PROTECTION FENCETURF REINFORCEMENT MATWETLAND LINEWETLAND FILLWETLAND BUFFERWETLAND BUFFER LIMITSWETLAND BUFFER MONUMENT PROPERTY LINESOIL BORING LOCATIONINDEX CONTOURINTERVAL CONTOURSPOT ELEVATIONHIGH/LOW POINTCL-CL ELEVATIONFLOW DIRECTIONEMERGENCY OVERFLOWPROPOSED STREET PROFILE GRADESTORM SEWERRETAINING WALL (MODULAR BLOCK)GRADING LIMITSSILT FENCESILT FENCE-POST GRADINGHEAVY DUTY SILT FENCEREDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLINLET PROTECTIONEROSION CONTROL CHECKS/BIOROLLSROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEEROSION CONTROL BLANKETPOND NORMAL WATER LEVELPOND ACCESS MAINTENANCE BENCHDO NOT DISTURB TO PROPOSED GRADE. ELEVATIONS AND HOUSE STYLES SHOWN ARE ENGINEERS SUGGESTED INDICATES A CUSTOM HOUSE PAD WHICH HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETELY GRADED OR PREPAREDDESIGN FOR CUSTOM LOTS AND SHOULD BE VERIFIED WITH THE DEVELOPER. THE NUMBER IN THE PARENTHESIS INDICATES THE SOG = SLAB ON GRADE UNIT.SOG (1) = SLAB ON GRADE UNIT GRADED FOR 0.70' OF DIFFERENCE FROM SLAB FLOOR ELEVATION TO FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE FLOOR.SOG (2) = SLAB ON GRADE UNIT GRADED FOR 1.30' OF DIFFERENCE FROM SLAB FLOOR ELEVATION TO FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE FLOOR. TO FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE DOOR. NUMBER OF BLOCKS THAT THE GARAGE IS DROPPED. EACH BLOCK=8". R = RAMBLER, GRADED FOR 8.2' OF DIFFERENCE FROM BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION GRADE AT THE LOOKOUT TO THE FRONT GROUND GRADE AT THE GARAGE DOOR.WO = FULL BASEMENT WALKOUT GRADED FOR 8.7' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE REAR GROUND GRADE AT THE WALKOUT TO THE FRONT GROUND GRADE AT THE GARAGE DOOR.SE = SPLIT ENTRY GRADED FOR 4.0' OF DIFFERENCE FROM BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION TO THE FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE DOOR.SE WO = SPLIT ENTRY WALKOUT, GRADED FOR 4.5' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATION AT THE REAR OF THE PAD TO THE FRONT GARAGE SLAB ELEVATION AT FRONT OF HOUSE.NOTE:1. LO = FULL BASEMENT LOOKOUT GRADED FOR 5.4' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE REAR GROUND DRAINAGE ARROW CUSTOM 02 88 900.00900.00CL-CL900.00TW=XXX.XX HP/LPBW=XXX.XX GLSF 99 RSC HDSF X.XX%& EROSION CONTROL 0.00% POST-SF PRELIMINARY GRADING PROPOSED E.O.F. DND 02 88 900.00 99 STO EXISTING GRADING & EROSION CONTROL LEGEND % % 7% . 1 2 .9 . 42 6 25SEE SHEET 21 11 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 3 27 7 5 1 % 5% . 7 . 0 3 % 0 22. 6% 0 . 5 6 10 (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 % 8 . 23 28 %5 7 % . 3 5 . 1 % 44 4 . 1 2 6 7 PhoneFax 9 % 0 %. 99 . 3 29 % 6 % 2 0 3. . 06 6 %% 1 25 .7. 6 3 2 8 3 1 5 % 30 0 . 6 % 5 . 1 % 0 . 5 % 9 . 1 5 4 31 0 7 7 % 4 . 2% % 0 . 3 3% . 7 . 7 6 32 2 3 12 1 4214 % 9 . 96 6 4210 2 33 1 % 6 5 . 4 COTTAGE GROVE, MN 421142124213 % 1 % . 7. 6 9 34 G 4205 MISSISSIPPI LANDING 2 T 8 6 E E 5 R 7 OUTLOT F T 4204 S 4203 35 1 4 1 1 1 3 % 7 .1 % 1. 7 3 % 0 . % 6 3 . 7 41257 3 22 1 . 2 6 4 + 2 1 2 21% 2 6 . 1 0 1 0LICENSE NO. 1 B 1 %T E 7 E 0 . R 2 DT 3 S T MINNESOTA E E R 18 T S % 12/29/21 3 .% 53 6 .9. % 0 2 9. % 17 9 1 RYAN M. BLUHMDATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF 9 % 22 2 . 3 F 17 S 9 18 4 7. % % 5 8. 5 1 % 16 4 . 23 21 2 %5 1 .19 0 F GAS TANKS S % 2 . 0 16 24 8 20 3 7.5 %8. % 7 1 15 % SEE SHEET 3 . F 3 S % 1 . 4 8 % 6 . 6 15 6 1 7 %5.6 F S 21 9 7 14 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 %7 .1 % 8 . 1 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 F % S 4 . 5 %5 . 8 14 11 7 %3 .0 8 13 22 % 0% 2.8 . 6 4 % 1 . 0 F S PREPARED FOR: 6 436243634364 4365 %G 5.U 6 P 13 F 5 S 26 G U P % 2 . 12 0 % 3 G . U 0 P 4357 9 23 F G U 6 SP 4356 % 2 . 0 % 1 . 8 4358 4355 % 3 . 0 12 43594360 436143674368 SEE SHEET % 11 4 . 1 5 8 F % 0.S % 9 5 . 1 10 24 % 0 . 11 9 87378725 8734 87278736 10% 1 . 4 5 F S % 4 . 7 25 2 87388739 8740 11 872687358724 4 % 8 . 3 %10 F ..... 2 . S 5% 8 . 9 6 12/29/21 G % 8731872987308723 3 873287338728 . 7 T E 26 E 1 ..... R T % % 0 F 5.4 S .S 45 9 INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: % 30 . 2 8 % 3 . 7 F % S 5... . 5' 6 27 50' 2 OR D T E 8 E 410' R T S 8066 8065 7 %%80638064 5 . 4 2 . 80788079 3 8080 F S % 2 . 7 3 8068 8077 8069 8070 8067 28 23SEE SHEET 8176 806280768075 7 8071 F S % FS 1 . 7 6 F S 30 29 DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: % 3 %. 47 . 1 N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-GDP02.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 02/05/2020 GD25AGD25A LAST REVISED: OF 150' 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance 25 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 100' AT GARAGE DOOR LOT CORNER ELEVATIONLOT NUMBERREAR GROUND GRADE ATLOOKOUTMINIMUM BASEMENTFLOOR ELEVATIONFRONT GROUND GRADE 50' 989.6 6.089 1" = DRIVEWAY 0030343.00 G 50' 0 . 3 8 9TYPICAL LOT 99 991.0 986.0 VARIES LO 980.00' 2.989 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NUMBER: PLAN TOP AND BOTTOM OF RETAINING WALLTREE LINETREE PROTECTION FENCETURF REINFORCEMENT MATWETLAND LINEWETLAND FILLWETLAND BUFFERWETLAND BUFFER LIMITSWETLAND BUFFER MONUMENT PROPERTY LINESOIL BORING LOCATIONINDEX CONTOURINTERVAL CONTOURSPOT ELEVATIONHIGH/LOW POINTCL-CL ELEVATIONFLOW DIRECTIONEMERGENCY OVERFLOWPROPOSED STREET PROFILE GRADESTORM SEWERRETAINING WALL (MODULAR BLOCK)GRADING LIMITSSILT FENCESILT FENCE-POST GRADINGHEAVY DUTY SILT FENCEREDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLINLET PROTECTIONEROSION CONTROL CHECKS/BIOROLLSROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEEROSION CONTROL BLANKETPOND NORMAL WATER LEVELPOND ACCESS MAINTENANCE BENCHDO NOT DISTURB TO PROPOSED GRADE. ELEVATIONS AND HOUSE STYLES SHOWN ARE ENGINEERS SUGGESTED INDICATES A CUSTOM HOUSE PAD WHICH HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETELY GRADED OR PREPAREDDESIGN FOR CUSTOM LOTS AND SHOULD BE VERIFIED WITH THE DEVELOPER. THE NUMBER IN THE PARENTHESIS INDICATES THE SOG = SLAB ON GRADE UNIT.SOG (1) = SLAB ON GRADE UNIT GRADED FOR 0.70' OF DIFFERENCE FROM SLAB FLOOR ELEVATION TO FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE FLOOR.SOG (2) = SLAB ON GRADE UNIT GRADED FOR 1.30' OF DIFFERENCE FROM SLAB FLOOR ELEVATION TO FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE FLOOR. TO FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE DOOR. NUMBER OF BLOCKS THAT THE GARAGE IS DROPPED. EACH BLOCK=8". R = RAMBLER, GRADED FOR 8.2' OF DIFFERENCE FROM BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION GRADE AT THE LOOKOUT TO THE FRONT GROUND GRADE AT THE GARAGE DOOR.WO = FULL BASEMENT WALKOUT GRADED FOR 8.7' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE REAR GROUND GRADE AT THE WALKOUT TO THE FRONT GROUND GRADE AT THE GARAGE DOOR.SE = SPLIT ENTRY GRADED FOR 4.0' OF DIFFERENCE FROM BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION TO THE FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE DOOR.SE WO = SPLIT ENTRY WALKOUT, GRADED FOR 4.5' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATION AT THE REAR OF THE PAD TO THE FRONT GARAGE SLAB ELEVATION AT FRONT OF HOUSE.NOTE:1. LO = FULL BASEMENT LOOKOUT GRADED FOR 5.4' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE REAR GROUND DRAINAGE ARROW CUSTOM 02 88 900.00900.00CL-CL900.00TW=XXX.XX HP/LPBW=XXX.XX GLSF 99 RSC HDSF X.XX%& EROSION CONTROL 0.00% POST-SF PRELIMINARY GRADING PROPOSED E.O.F. DND 02 88 900.00 99 STO EXISTING GRADING & EROSION CONTROL LEGEND |12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 6250 | | | H | O P | | | | | | H O P | F S | (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 | |61846185 | | H O| P | SF | 6249 | PhoneFax | |618161826183 H | O P | F | S | | 617361716170 6172 | | HF S O P| | | F S | | | H O| P | | FF S |S | |61506151 6152 H | O 6169 6175617661746180 P | | 6168617961776178 614661486149 | | F | S H| O P61676166 | | | | F S | F S | H O | P6156 6141 6147 | 6157 | | 6153 61556154 | | H | O P | | | F |S F | 61346135 6143S | H O | P | | 6145 61426144 6140 6139 | | COTTAGE GROVE, MN | H | O P 6129 | F |S | 6133 POND 4BOT 714.0NWL 723.0HWL 725.6EOF 727.5BERM 728.0 | | F |MISSISSIPPI LANDING HS O6165 P | 61326136 6137 6138 | | | 6158 | 6128 | HF O |S P FS |6130 FS | | | F |S HX |F O PS | | | | X | | H F OS P| 61276131 | | X | | 41257 F S | | F | S XF |S | 6464 6463 | 6125 |6126 | X | | | F S LICENSE NO. X F S MINNESOTA X F S 64616462 12/29/21 F S 27 22 RYAN M. BLUHMDATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF F S 6124 F S INF BASIN 3BOT 713.0OUTLET 714.5HWL 717.8EOF 719.5BERM 720.0 F S F S 13 SEE SHEET SEE SHEET 6123 F S 1 19 20 2 18 F 3 S 17 4 5 16 %% % 87 %8 . .. 5% 6 .56 6 4 5. 9 % % 7 7 . 7 . 5 7 % 4 . 8191 7 15% 17.50+87 5 .% 5 3 . 7 5 0 2 % 7 78 14 . 7 % %6 . 4 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 . 6 5 1 OUTLOT C 2 14 % C 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 T 1 %E . E 8 R .T 72 %S 2 5 % 2 . 7 . 6 4 % 0 . 6 1 8 13 % 7 . 4 % % 1 6. . 64 1211 % 22 % 9 9. . 2 5 77 PREPARED FOR: % 12 5 . 21 4 20 % 2 . 6 13 19 % 5 3 . 1 5 1118 17 % 2 . 6 % 14 8 . 10 3 C 6 23 7 % 2 T .% 8 .9 E 6 E 4 1 R 9 % T 4 . 15 S 2 % 3 . 10 6 8 % 8 . 4 16 15 % 7. 5 %24 2 . 3% 6 10 . 3 6 % 5 4 . 7 7 9 17 ..... %12/29/21 A 3 . 6 T %14 8 . E 3 % E 2 . R 4 % 3 T . 3 18 S ..... 2 25 1 % 8 0 . 0 INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: % 7 2 . 13 5 19 4% 2 7. 6 % 6 % . 0 0 . 1 % ... 9 7 . 5' 6 50' 26 12 OR 20 % 10' 8 . 0 % % 7% . 1 2 . 9. 42 6 21 11 3 27 7 5 1 % 5% . 7 . 0 3 24%SEE SHEET 0 22. 6% 0 . 5 6 10 DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: % 8 . 23 28 5 N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-GDP02.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 02/05/2020 GD25AGD25A LAST REVISED: OF 150' 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance 26 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 100' AT GARAGE DOOR LOT CORNER ELEVATIONLOT NUMBERREAR GROUND GRADE ATLOOKOUTMINIMUM BASEMENTFLOOR ELEVATIONFRONT GROUND GRADE 50' 989.6 6.089 1" = DRIVEWAY 0030343.00 G 50' 983.0TYPICAL LOT 99 991.0 986.0 VARIES WETLAND LINEWETLAND FILLWETLAND BUFFERWETLAND BUFFER LIMITSWETLAND BUFFER MONUMENT SOIL BORING LOCATIONSPOT ELEVATIONCL-CL ELEVATIONTOP AND BOTTOM OF RETAINING WALLSTORM SEWERTREE LINETREE PROTECTION FENCEGRADING LIMITSSILT FENCESILT FENCE-POST GRADINGTURF REINFORCEMENT MAT PROPERTY LINEINDEX CONTOURINTERVAL CONTOURHIGH/LOW POINTFLOW DIRECTIONEMERGENCY OVERFLOWPROPOSED STREET PROFILE GRADERETAINING WALL (MODULAR BLOCK)HEAVY DUTY SILT FENCEREDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLINLET PROTECTIONEROSION CONTROL CHECKS/BIOROLLSROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEEROSION CONTROL BLANKETPOND NORMAL WATER LEVELPOND ACCESS MAINTENANCE BENCHDO NOT DISTURB LO 980.00' 2.989 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NUMBER: PLAN TO PROPOSED GRADE. ELEVATIONS AND HOUSE STYLES SHOWN ARE ENGINEERS SUGGESTED INDICATES A CUSTOM HOUSE PAD WHICH HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETELY GRADED OR PREPAREDDESIGN FOR CUSTOM LOTS AND SHOULD BE VERIFIED WITH THE DEVELOPER. 02 THE NUMBER IN THE PARENTHESIS INDICATES THE 88 TW=XXX.XX 900.00HP/LP900.00CL-CL900.00BW=XXX.XX SF 99 GL RSC HDSF SOG = SLAB ON GRADE UNIT.SOG (1) = SLAB ON GRADE UNIT GRADED FOR 0.70' OF DIFFERENCE FROM SLAB FLOOR ELEVATION TO FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE FLOOR.SOG (2) = SLAB ON GRADE UNIT GRADED FOR 1.30' OF DIFFERENCE FROM SLAB FLOOR ELEVATION TO FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE FLOOR. TO FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE DOOR. NUMBER OF BLOCKS THAT THE GARAGE IS DROPPED. EACH BLOCK=8". R = RAMBLER, GRADED FOR 8.2' OF DIFFERENCE FROM BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION GRADE AT THE LOOKOUT TO THE FRONT GROUND GRADE AT THE GARAGE DOOR.WO = FULL BASEMENT WALKOUT GRADED FOR 8.7' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE REAR GROUND GRADE AT THE WALKOUT TO THE FRONT GROUND GRADE AT THE GARAGE DOOR.SE = SPLIT ENTRY GRADED FOR 4.0' OF DIFFERENCE FROM BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION TO THE FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE DOOR.SE WO = SPLIT ENTRY WALKOUT, GRADED FOR 4.5' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATION AT THE REAR OF THE PAD TO THE FRONT GARAGE SLAB ELEVATION AT FRONT OF HOUSE.NOTE:1. X.XX%LO = FULL BASEMENT LOOKOUT GRADED FOR 5.4' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE REAR GROUND 0.00% POST-SF PROPOSED E.O.F. DND DRAINAGE ARROW CUSTOM & EROSION CONTROL PRELIMINARY GRADING 02 88 900.00 99 STO EXISTING GRADING & EROSION CONTROL LEGEND 46424645 4641 46634662 F S 9300 27SEE SHEET 462846614627 46334629 4634 46594660463946374638 46144615 46354636 463046324631 F S 46124610 4611 4622 93029301 4616 461746134620 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 F S 460946184619 46064624 4608 4625 4626 (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 F 4623 S462146074603 PhoneFax 460446054600 F S 4369 46014602 F 4370 S 8706 8705 F S 8707 POND 6BOT 724.0NWL 732.5HWL 736.9EOF 738.2BERM 738.7 8701 F S 870487038702 COTTAGE GROVE, MN F S MISSISSIPPI LANDING 8700 F S 4362436343654364 F S G U P G 41257 U P 4366 87198720 G U P 4356 8699 S A G 43554358 G U P87148715 43594360S A 436143674368G LICENSE NO. 8713 G8716 U P S A G 25 87128709 87188717871187108708 GU P SMINNESOTA A G G U P SA G G U P 12/29/21 S A G 87378725 8698 8734 87278736 RYAN M. BLUHMDATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF SEE SHEET G U P 87388739 S A G 87358724 8726 S A G G OUTLOT G U P 87308723 8731873287338729 8728 E E E E E E EE EE EE EE E E E E E E EE 87228721 EE E E E SILT FENCE (TYP) FS 8066 86978696 808080788079 F S F EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 S 8661 8662 8068869286878688 806980778660 86588659 86518653 8067807086568663 810881138110 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 81048103 8105 864785488546 8648869186938695 %86838681 86858684 PLASTIC PIPE IN WATER 810281128117811681158557 80768075 0 80918089 . 80968095 8071 5 86648669 809080948694 F F S F S 80978145S SF85478650 8649 F S 853986528657 86548655 86658666 869086898686 8543 86678668 8085 80938158 80888092 8542 85498552855185508537 86728671 8670 81068107 85598556855885548555 86748676 X XX 85298528 8679 8109811181148118811985328680 8535 PREPARED FOR: 808781658159 SCALE 1"=30' F F 81628160 S S 81298127 F 854485458540 S 8560 8161 8146 8553 8513 81568157 8155 85418517 8673 813381348125 81288126 81448143 X8147815381528139 81238121 8124812281208496 8495 85268524 85128504 85318530 86788682 8677 20' WIDE ASSUMED ACCESS 85118515 85278523 F 853885368534 S85058508 8525 8641 1 F8163 817286158635 85008498 S 84978499 F 86438642864086758645 S 861386148616 81718170 81678166 X8612852185338522 850985148519851886118516 8164816881698331 % 81518154814981488150 5 . 81328326 86448646 5 8501 8503 8329 832581378330 F S 86368637 8624 8623 8617 8610 86098608 F8520 850285108506 XF83278328 S S 86398638 % 8619 8634 7 . 6 F S86188620 8323 X X X86258632 85638561 860686058633 86028630 F 8621 S8622 85078564 86278631 36 8315 HOP 5 %6.0 G PU 4 . 8332 83348333 F S 2 4 831383148316 860786048629 + 3 83118310 86288626 834983508352 6 8580858685858603859485878601 834083418584858285898574 F85818583 S 8562 83388339 833783368346 7942 ..... 83578356 859885958600 % 12/29/21 F 8408841184128415 5 834784108409859785968599 .S 7 8360 838983518388 842783488335 83628358 8375 837483128379 83618359 83878385 8364 8578 83428593 8592 838383848386 85888577 8421 84168433 ..... 85768579 84268407 842485758573 84238417842284148567 840384068429 8569 83768378 856685708568 8365 844384398435 F INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: 84048391 8451 16 84448445 8440 S 83908392 83448565 85718572834585908591 8370837283738398 8367 79337932 8369836679248371840584018425 8368 8430 83778380 8438 8434 8343 83818395839984638436 83828413841884198420 ... 8396 7916 5' 8437 8402839384428441 8394 50' 8400 84318478 8428 8480 OR F7876839784648446 8447 79158476 8450 S 8462 10' 84498461 79297928 8432848284558448 7925 7930 79268452 84938494 SF791779187923 788378787887 84758487848979068492 787378807879 8479 84888486 79197877 8485 8457 7921 7840 8453 8456 8467 84598474 7905 84688454 847184658460 8466 84778481 7776 8490 7881 8491790878957907 78757874 783678377838 7843 7927 7866 786779227920 8458 7891 7885 7886 8484791184837910 79147912 7913 7909 84728473 8469 7835 7834 78827888 78717884 78727870 78687869 777178247831782678337832 DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: 7904 N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-GDP02.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 02/05/2020 GD25AGD25A LAST REVISED: OF 150' 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance 27 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 100' AT GARAGE DOOR LOT CORNER ELEVATIONLOT NUMBERREAR GROUND GRADE ATLOOKOUTMINIMUM BASEMENTFLOOR ELEVATIONFRONT GROUND GRADE 50' 989.6 6.089 1" = DRIVEWAY 0030343.00 G 50' 983.0TYPICAL LOT 99 991.0 986.0 VARIES WETLAND LINEWETLAND FILLWETLAND BUFFERWETLAND BUFFER LIMITSWETLAND BUFFER MONUMENT SOIL BORING LOCATIONSPOT ELEVATIONCL-CL ELEVATIONTOP AND BOTTOM OF RETAINING WALLSTORM SEWERTREE LINETREE PROTECTION FENCEGRADING LIMITSSILT FENCESILT FENCE-POST GRADINGTURF REINFORCEMENT MAT PROPERTY LINEINDEX CONTOURINTERVAL CONTOURHIGH/LOW POINTFLOW DIRECTIONEMERGENCY OVERFLOWPROPOSED STREET PROFILE GRADERETAINING WALL (MODULAR BLOCK)HEAVY DUTY SILT FENCEREDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLINLET PROTECTIONEROSION CONTROL CHECKS/BIOROLLSROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEEROSION CONTROL BLANKETPOND NORMAL WATER LEVELPOND ACCESS MAINTENANCE BENCHDO NOT DISTURB LO 980.00' 2.989 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NUMBER: PLAN TO PROPOSED GRADE. ELEVATIONS AND HOUSE STYLES SHOWN ARE ENGINEERS SUGGESTED INDICATES A CUSTOM HOUSE PAD WHICH HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETELY GRADED OR PREPAREDDESIGN FOR CUSTOM LOTS AND SHOULD BE VERIFIED WITH THE DEVELOPER. 02 THE NUMBER IN THE PARENTHESIS INDICATES THE 88 TW=XXX.XX 900.00HP/LP900.00CL-CL900.00BW=XXX.XX SF 99 GL RSC HDSF SOG = SLAB ON GRADE UNIT.SOG (1) = SLAB ON GRADE UNIT GRADED FOR 0.70' OF DIFFERENCE FROM SLAB FLOOR ELEVATION TO FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE FLOOR.SOG (2) = SLAB ON GRADE UNIT GRADED FOR 1.30' OF DIFFERENCE FROM SLAB FLOOR ELEVATION TO FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE FLOOR. TO FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE DOOR. NUMBER OF BLOCKS THAT THE GARAGE IS DROPPED. EACH BLOCK=8". R = RAMBLER, GRADED FOR 8.2' OF DIFFERENCE FROM BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION GRADE AT THE LOOKOUT TO THE FRONT GROUND GRADE AT THE GARAGE DOOR.WO = FULL BASEMENT WALKOUT GRADED FOR 8.7' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE REAR GROUND GRADE AT THE WALKOUT TO THE FRONT GROUND GRADE AT THE GARAGE DOOR.SE = SPLIT ENTRY GRADED FOR 4.0' OF DIFFERENCE FROM BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION TO THE FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE DOOR.SE WO = SPLIT ENTRY WALKOUT, GRADED FOR 4.5' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATION AT THE REAR OF THE PAD TO THE FRONT GARAGE SLAB ELEVATION AT FRONT OF HOUSE.NOTE:1. X.XX%LO = FULL BASEMENT LOOKOUT GRADED FOR 5.4' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE REAR GROUND 0.00% POST-SF PROPOSED E.O.F. DND DRAINAGE ARROW CUSTOM & EROSION CONTROL PRELIMINARY GRADING 02 88 900.00 99 STO EXISTING GRADING & EROSION CONTROL LEGEND F S 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 F 6394 6393 S (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 6406 64056404 F S 63926391 6464 6463 PhoneFax F S 6465 F S 6420 FF S S FF S S6403 SF 64616462 OUTLET 723.5 POND 5BOT 718.0HWL 727.1EOF 727.5BERM 728.0 6396 F S 6399 6397 6395 F S 6398 6400 F S F S F S F S F S 4904 4903 4902 641664186419 F S 64026401 4901 F F S 488648884887 S 4900 487948904889 4892 64216417 4864 48664865 17 48584857 4878 48854881489148954896 4880 4915 F 48624863 OUTLOT C S4867 4894 4859 16 % 4893488348974898 9 4899 . 48684870 COTTAGE GROVE, MN 3 4882 4874 % 48614852 0 4860 . 6 6 15 49194920 4850 48564853 SF 7 MISSISSIPPI LANDING 4877 4876 13 491649174918 8 4855 4854 9 48734875 487148844869 %4872 2 . 4 % 4 14 . 10 485149364935 8 7 2 % F 6 S . 11 6 13 9 %2 12 6 . 4787 6 48114818 % % C 3 .2 T E. E 6 R 67 T 2 2 S%2 7 . 5 9003900490054934 41257 % % 3 .2 F .2 499990019002 S 6% 4 6 . 47854784 33 4786 2 0 .9007 7 6 0 0 .+ 0 09 1 3+ . 7 112 4740 + 9 1 6 2 4 2 % 47384739 C 9 T .E E R 5 T 4737 LICENSE NO. 2 5 S 9 47924790 % 49989016 1 5 . 4997 90129006 4 F S % 9 OUTLOT E . MINNESOTA 36 %3.5 478147824783 8 901590149013 4736 12/29/21 4993 18 4992 % 4991 F 1 S . 9 499649944995 % 4735 17 5 RYAN M. BLUHMDATE: .I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF 6575 4780 6574 7 35 %2.8 9017 4970 %5.5 16 4989 4988497349744977 14 4975 49674968 498149874976 F 12 S 8 1 4984 4951 4985 G 49694972 13 47304732 473447334990 4983 34 4965 T %47784779 7.5 49864950 E 4971 4964 % 4 . 7 E 4966 R 15 T 498249794980 S 49624963 F 47294947 4948 S 4949 49784960 15 % 2. 0 49594957 25 495449534952 33 4961 %7.4 495547314941 4943 4946 % 4 . 7 16 % 5 . 77 F S 1 494249584956 472847234727 11 472649444945 14 32 4720 3.9%47254724 12 SEE SHEET 4722 47214705 I % 17 3 . 7 % 3 %. 6 F EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 0 T . S 0 E 4719 47074706 E R 47094704 T 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 10 S 31 4701 4702 % %8.3 4 . 471547164717 %66 01 . 1 4699470347134708 18 F4710471147124718 S 46984700 4714 % 8 . 6 12 % 9 2 . 30 2 % %3.4 6 . 1 6 PREPARED FOR: 3 . 8 3 +46974696 19 8 F S 5 46954694 % 1 8 . 6 % 0 . 8 29 6 %2.4 20 F S 46924693 % 9 . 6 92959292 % 4 46904691 . 7 6 28 %5.4 F 21 S % 2 . 5 9296 6 47414689 5.3% 27 F S 5 9298 % .3 5 22 4742 9216 % 1 . 6 92179226 % 2 .F 92999297 6 S468746884686 ..... 12/29/21 9221 % % 0 0. .26 6 6 FS F 23 S ..... 12 9224 9195 9223 92229220 INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: 46734672 4674 4684 46834685 F4676 25 S 4680 46814682 F S 24 F S ... 46574651 5' 50' 46714669464846504649 F S OR F S 46754670 10' 465246534654 F S 46554656 4658 F S4646 46444647 OUTLOT F F S SF4668 4667466546664664 SF46434640 464146424645 46634662 F S 9300 4661 46284627 46334629 4634 26SEE SHEET 46594660463946374638 4614461546354636 DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: 463046324631 N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-GDP02.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 OF 450' 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance 28 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 300' 150' 1" = 0030343.00 150' PROPERTY LINEINDEX CONTOURINTERVAL CONTOURSTORM SEWERDO NOT DISTURB 0' 02 88 99 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED PROJECT NUMBER: BUFFER WETLAND BUFFERDELINEATED WETLAND (8.19 ACRES)WETLAND FILL (0.49 ACRES) 02 88 99 STO PRELIMINARY WETLAND EXISTING TWO ROWS OF SILT FENCE (SEPARATED BY 8 FEET); ORSILT FENCE AND A TOPSOIL BERM (STABILIZE BERM WITH MULCH); ORSILT FENCE AND FIBER LOGS; ORTOPSOIL BERM AND FIBER LOGS (STABILIZE BERM WITH MULCH). WETLAND LEGEND LEGEND 3.1.3.2.3.3.3.4. ALL SILT FENCE AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SHALL BE IN-PLACE PRIOR TO ANYALL STREETS DISTURBED DURING WORKING HOURS MUST BE CLEANED AT THE END OF EACHWORKING DAY. A ROCK ENTRANCE TO THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED ACCORDING TO DETAILSTO REDUCE TRACKING OF DIRT ONTO PUBLIC STREETS.WITHIN 50 FEET OF SURFACE WATERS. REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS COULD INCLUDE: EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL VIABLE TURF OR GROUNDCOVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. EXISTING SILT FENCE ON-SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND ORREMOVED AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. IT IS OFEXTREME IMPORTANCE TO BE AWARE OF CURRENT FIELD CONDITIONS WITH RESPECT TOEROSION CONTROL. TEMPORARY PONDING, DIKES, HAY BALES, ETC., REQUIRED BY THE CITYSHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT.REDUNDANT PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS ARE NECESSARY WHEN SOIL DISTURBANCE ISREDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO DISTURBING WITHIN 50 FEETOF THE SURFACE WATER. 4. 2.3. EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 PhoneFax X X X X | | | H| O P | | | | F | S | H F S O | P | | | | | F H S O| P | | | | | F H|S O P | | F | S | | | HFS O | P | | | X | | HF 0 S |.F O PS 0 | 5 | X | | | F S | H O P |X | | F S | | COTTAGE GROVE, MN X |F S HF S O | P 13 | |1 19 20 2 18 | X 3 17 | 4 | 5 MISSISSIPPI LANDING H 16 |F O PS 6 | 1891 7 |.50+87 17 X 0 8 |2 15 |7 9 1 0 5 .1 2 F |10 0 78 HS O 5 11 P| OUTLOT C 2 2 14 | C |TE E R TS 3 2 | 6 1 13 |. 7 1 13+ 94 |12 H O | P F 1211 S 22 | 7 9 |12 7 21 1 | 20 | 13 5 19 |1 H 1118 O | P F 17 S | | 16 14 |110 2 | 5 6 C 23 8 12 4 |T 7 20E 1 41257 1 H E R O|9G T P S15 T | E E |R T 10 F 8S | S 3 |16 15 3 | 24 1 19 H 7 | 5 O 6 7 P 7 |7 1 9 17 1 11 | A 6 | T 14 E E |8 R 2 T 1 18 4 1 S | 5 25 LICENSE NO. 8 H| 18 O 7 P |13 4 10 19 7 | 6 4 OUTLOT C 1 | F 1 6 7 1 9 S |1 26 12 17 1 MINNESOTA 20 | D 3 9 |T 7 . E 0 F E 6 |S 0 R H 21 3 11 T 5 + O S 7 0 9 27 1 P|16 1 1 | 12/29/21 22 8 |5 5 1 10 | 15 2328 4 |9 2 1 144 7 7 | H 24 RYAN M. BLUHMDATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF O| 9 P F 13 S 29 6 | 3 EXISTING CULVERT TO REMAIN 6 8 4 | 1 1 12 7 |3 4 2 8 1 5 30 | 11 | 12 7 C 1 H T |0 10E E O 7 4 R 31 T P S 3 |11 1 7 F 9 | S 32 10 2 |6 3 12 1 9 8 6 | 9 F 33 13 |S 6 2 7 1 | 8 X H 5 3 O 8 34 G | P 14 6 2 F T S 7 E E |5 0 . 7 R TOUTLOT F 0 6 F S 5 1 35 |S 154 1 6 | 71 A 6 4 T 1 E 3 E R 5 |T 16S 2 1 23 5 1 | . 4 6 2 1 2 | 17 4 6 6 21 + | 2 0 0202 1 B F 18 0.4T 0 1 EE 5 R S T 1 DS 20 T E 3 E 5 3 R F 6 T18 19 S S 9 4 19 1 17 3 3 20 4 1822 2 9 1 6 C 17 T E 8 18 PROPOSED 21" CULVERTIE = 709.95E 2 19 R 17 T 16 23 S 2 19 2 3 GAS TANKS F 1 6 FFS SSFS 16 16 16 24 7 1 1 20 8 2 656 15 7 5 0 15 0.00 +1856 25 1 95 06 8 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 6 1 14 1 5 2615 5 A TEERTS7 1 F 0+1 S 0.0 0 2 21 9 WATER PUMP 14 13 7 27 5 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 1 12 F 4 4 S 5 28 B14 11 7 T E E 11R8 F T13 S S 1022 2 56 9 6 29 8 7 4 1 F 0 6 . S 5 2 F S 3 3013 IE= 709.67 G 5 2 U P 0 3 0 .1 12 5 B 0 F 30 T9 23 S E31 1 + F E4 6 1 R S T S F 2 G 32 U P S 2 12 3 11 S A 33 G 25 1 E 8 G U 34 P T10 24 2 E 3 3935E EXISTING 48" CULVERTSTO REMAIN3837 5 36 2 R T F S F S 1 PREPARED FOR: S 1 11 110 5 A T E 0 E 1 25 132 R 49 T S 5 68 47 11 4 0 F 10 11 S F 9 5 S 3 G B TEERTS 14 T OUTLOT B SF EE 0 OUTLOT A.26EE 5 1 2 E RE E T E 4 E SE 5 12EE 9 3 EE 00 EE EE EE 01 .EE 8E E EE 0 11E 0 F E 15E PROPOSED 24" CULVERTIE= 707.52 +S 0 0 2 0 10 56 0 27 . 06 D 00 1 4 T 0 7E8 E 1 239R T +F S 6 S 7 01 46 0 58 5 REMOVE EXISTING CULVERTS F 0 FF S 16. S S 3 0 1 WATER PUMP 0 28 7 0 1+ FSF 7 S 1 6 F SFF 1 30 F S 29 S FS F 1 SS F 6 S 17 8 0 15 F 9 X S 6 X F 11 X S 2 5 31 9 0 1 F 20' WIDE ASSUMED ACCESS 18 FSF HS 32 4 S 1 F 2 O S 6 P 5 4 F 3 7,906 SQFT (FILL)S 6 0 1 9 5 X 1 2 SA G 8 F 5 SFF S 1 S 19 0 XH 1 PO 6 X S A 00. GH 00162 +1636 F 1 O 1 PX 1 E X 5 7 SH 1 5 O FPX T X 4 E S. 3 E X R F 20 2 15 T 6 POHF H S S 7 POS S F TEERTS A 4 X F G 64 T 50 E .E R T 6 S+ 2 H 7 O 1 H P +3 1 OF P 3 S 6 H 0 S X 50 A RE= 706.0. 21 O G 501 10 0 P 24" IE= 701.0 H+ O 1 9 3 P 1 7 19 CONSTRUCT STMH. OVER EXISTING 48" F 4 S EXIST. 48" IE= 698.56 6 11 5 4 F H+15 .131416 7 O S P 44 12 F 3 22 5 S 0 2 +F S 3 F S 1 E 1 T E E 8 R FS..... T S F 23 F S SH 12/29/21 O 3 P 5 4 1 10 247 6 5 F S 2 ..... 5 25 3 10 F F H S T E O E P R T S INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: F S 2 F S 1 5 F SX 1 H... H O P 0 O 0 5 P 0 F .150' . S 0 S LI 0 OUTLOT I A + R T 0 D 5 U X S O A L C G Y E R G DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-WLP01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 OF 300' 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance 29 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 200' 100' SANITARY SEWERSANITARY FORCE MAINSTORM SEWERWATER MAIN DRAIN TILEHYDRANT 1" = 0030343.00 100' FM 0' PROPOSED NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NUMBER: S PLAN DT FM SANSTO WATWAT EXISTING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ANDAND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION BYTHE CITY ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION OF MINN." AND TO THE "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FORAS OUTLINED BY THE LOCAL AGENCY.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE THE NECESSARY PERMITS FOR ALL WORK OUTSIDE OF THEVERIFY EXISTING INVERT LOCATION & ELEVATION PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" FOR FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS NOTIFY THE OWNER OF ANY DIFFERENCES.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST. TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALLCONFORM TO THE 2013 ED. OF THE "STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAINHIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION" MINN. DEPT. OF TRANS., AUGUST 31, 2016 INCLUDING THECURRENT ADDENDUM. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO FOLLOW ALL PROCEDURESPROPERTY LIMITS.PRIOR TO UTILITY INSTALLATION. PRELIMINARY UTILITY 4. GENERAL UTILITY NOTES 2.3.5. UTILITY LEGEND 1. S A G H O P M F | H | O FOH P| O P S | A | G | | X | H | O P | M | F |X | H| O| H FO PO P| X | FORCEMAIN GAS| | | | H X O P | | M F| | | H 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 H O| O O P F P| S | A | G | | H | O P | | | | FM | H(952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 | 20 HO P O | O F P | S | A | G | H| O P | | PhoneFax 8" WATERMAINCONNECTION | 1 | 2 | 5 FM | H O P | H 20 O O| F SEE SHEET P | S | A G| | H O | P 3 | | | 19 | | 7 H FM O| 1 P H| O| FO P | S 8 A| 1 G | 4 H | O 5 P | |18 | | | 4 D | 6 FM H 1 | HO P 9 O T |17 O F 1 OUTLOT C P E | S E 3 A|7 . 0 R G 0 | + T 9 | 1 S | 16 0 H |1 O P | 5 | 1 | M F| H 15 O O | F P 9 S| H 14 AO P | G CONNECTION| 18" WATERMAIN | 13 | COTTAGE GROVE, MN 4 | 1 8 H| 12 O P | 4 M H| F O O 11 F | P C S MISSISSIPPI LANDING | A 12 T G |7 E E 10 |R T H 11 |S O P | 9 | 10 | 6 |8 MH FO O F X 9 P| S A| H G O 7 | P 8 | 5 3 | 14 7 X | | 6 |15 H H 6 M O O O| F 41257 F P P | 4 5 | 16 5 | |4 |17 H 6 O 6 | P | H 18 LICENSE NO. O MO 4 | F F P | 3 3 | 5 19 6 |MINNESOTA H O P 4 | C 3 H O | P 3 T 20 | 12/29/21 18 E 2 4 1 6 |E O MF R | F 2 T 17 | S RYAN M. BLUHMDATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF 2 | 1 3 | 6 16 16 0 1 0 .0 0 0 0 + 0 1 0 2 1 15 O 6 F 5 6 7 5 M 00.0 0+1 85 F 6 1 9 5 06 1 A 14 TE ER TS 26 5 8" WATERMAIN &18" WATERMAIN 1 5 0+1 0.0 0 2 S 13 A 27 G 1 0 1 12 O F 4 4 WATER PUMP M 28 5 F X 11 2 10 5 9 6 29 8 7 4 1 B S A X 3 G 30 T 2 2 3 E 0 0 O 50 8" WATERMAIN.1 E F 10 0 M 31 3+ R F 11 T S 2 E 32 2 3 T X 33 E X 2 S 1 E 34 A R 3 G 2 3935 T 0 3837 2-8" WATERMAIN 36 5 12 S A O F 1 M 8" WATERMAIN 1 T F 1 E E EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 X R 8" WATERMAIN 13 0 1 X 4 T 9 S 5 468 7 0 S 11 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 A 5 B TEERTS G M 14 F FO X OUTLOT B12 OUTLOT A 5SANITARY SEWER (TYP) 0 1 0 0 11 . 15 0 0 8" WATERMAIN + 00 10 0 6 5 M 0 . SF 0 A 0 0 1 +6 G 7 0 6 29 3 5018" WATERMAINSTUB 1 X 6 4 5 8 FO 16 PREPARED FOR: 1 M F 7 0 1 1 1 1 6 S FORCEMAIN WATER PUMP X A 17 G 14 M F 8 0 1 O F 9 0 18 1 X H 2 O 6 P M SF A G 0 1 1 FO SAG H O P X FORCEMAIN 19 SOH AP G XS A XG 20 H 1 O P H O X 1 P S A 1 G 1 X 3 X 6 X H SO P AH 15 X S GOA G H P O P H 2 O P 1 1 S A G X H O P H O S AP G SEE SHEET 3 4 1 H S GAO 1 6 P 6 4 . 4 0 H H 22 OO P P + 3 1 1 5 ..... 6 23 12/29/21 5 0 . 1 6 6 6 5 + 6 24 6 ..... INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: 2 F 5 25 T E E R T S ... 1 5 S A G . S L I A R T 0 D 0 5 0 .U S 0 A 0 O G + 0 L 5 C Y OUTLOT I E R G DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-UTP01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 OF 300' 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance 30 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 200' 100' SANITARY SEWERSANITARY FORCE MAINSTORM SEWERWATER MAIN DRAIN TILEHYDRANT 1" = 0030343.00 100' FM 0' PROPOSED NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NUMBER: S PLAN DT FM SANSTO WATWAT EXISTING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ANDAND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION BYTHE CITY ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION OF MINN." AND TO THE "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FORAS OUTLINED BY THE LOCAL AGENCY.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE THE NECESSARY PERMITS FOR ALL WORK OUTSIDE OF THEVERIFY EXISTING INVERT LOCATION & ELEVATION PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" FOR FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS NOTIFY THE OWNER OF ANY DIFFERENCES.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST. TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALLCONFORM TO THE 2013 ED. OF THE "STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAINHIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION" MINN. DEPT. OF TRANS., AUGUST 31, 2016 INCLUDING THECURRENT ADDENDUM. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO FOLLOW ALL PROCEDURESPROPERTY LIMITS.PRIOR TO UTILITY INSTALLATION. 20SEE SHEET PRELIMINARY UTILITY 4. GENERAL UTILITY NOTES 2.3.5. UTILITY LEGEND 1. 23 2 1 . 2 6 4 1 2 21+ 6 6 D 2 2 0 T B 0 1 1 0 ET 2 E 1 E E R T 20 S R T 18 S 19 9 17 1 9 18 22 17 18 9 8 1 17 16 23 2 19 16 16 24 8 7 20 1 GAS TANKS 15 25 8 6 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 26 1 15 7 21 9 7 14 27 5 1 B 28 T 14 11 E 7 E 8 R 13 T(952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 22 S 6 4 1 6 13 5 G U P 0 12 PhoneFax 0 .1 0 0 9 23 3+ G 1 1 4 6 U P E S A G 12 T 11 G U P 5 E S A G 8 E G U P 10 R 24 S 3 A G T 2 S 11 10 5 25 2 S A 11 GG 4 G U 10 P 9 T 3 E E 14 E 26 R E 1OUTLOT G E E T E E 4 EE S EE 9 EE EE 3 E E EE E E 8 EE EE E E 15 E 2 27 D T 4 E 8 E R T 7 S 01 0 16 . 03 0 28 + PLASTIC PIPE IN WATER 1 7 6 30 29 17 5 9 XX 6 XX COTTAGE GROVE, MN 11 2 5 31 8" WATERMAIN 18 X X 32 4 1 MISSISSIPPI LANDING 4 5 3 6 SANITARY SEWER (TYP) 2 9 5 E 1 8 5 19 1 T X 00. 00 X +1 0 E 6 X X X E 16 26 36 75 R 5 4 HOP T. P F O H TEE RTS 2 S POH 20 F 4 7 T H E O+ P 64 E 5 0 R 3 . T 6 S 6 7 + 3 0 0 5. 1 21 50 10 0 +H 1 9 O 7 9 P .41257 4 5 + 7 11 15 1416 13 3 12 22 4 5 2 E T E H E 8 O R P T LICENSE NO. 23 S 3 5 4 10 MINNESOTA 247 H O P 6 12/29/21 5 2 F 5 25 T RYAN M. BLUHMDATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF 10 3 E E R T H O S P 2 1 5 X H O P . 1 S H O L P I A R X T 0 D 0 5 0 . U S 0 A 0 G O + 0 L 5 C H Y OUTLOT I H O E O P R P X G S A G S AH G O P H T O L T S A EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 H U G O P O 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 S A G PREPARED FOR: ..... 12/29/21 ..... INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: ... DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-UTP01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 OF 300' 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance 31 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 200' 100' SANITARY SEWERSANITARY FORCE MAINSTORM SEWERWATER MAIN DRAIN TILEHYDRANT 1" = 0030343.00 100' FM 0' PROPOSED NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NUMBER: S PLAN DT FM SANSTO WATWAT EXISTING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ANDAND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION BYTHE CITY ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION OF MINN." AND TO THE "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FORAS OUTLINED BY THE LOCAL AGENCY.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE THE NECESSARY PERMITS FOR ALL WORK OUTSIDE OF THEVERIFY EXISTING INVERT LOCATION & ELEVATION PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" FOR FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS NOTIFY THE OWNER OF ANY DIFFERENCES.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST. TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALLCONFORM TO THE 2013 ED. OF THE "STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAINHIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION" MINN. DEPT. OF TRANS., AUGUST 31, 2016 INCLUDING THECURRENT ADDENDUM. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO FOLLOW ALL PROCEDURESPROPERTY LIMITS.PRIOR TO UTILITY INSTALLATION. PRELIMINARY UTILITY 4. GENERAL UTILITY NOTES 2.3.5. UTILITY LEGEND 1. 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 PhoneFax | | | | H O P| | | | | | H O| P | | | | | H | O P | | | | | | H O P| | | | | | H O | P | | | | | H| OUTLOT D O P | | | COTTAGE GROVE, MN | | | H O P| | | | |MISSISSIPPI LANDING | X H | O P | | | | X | H| O P | | | X | | | H O P| |X | | | | H X | O P | | |41257 | X | 13 | 17 1 19 20 2 X 18 3 17 16 4 OUTLOT C 5 16 LICENSE NO. 6 15 7 19 81 17.50+87 13 8 15 0 2 9 MINNESOTA 7 5 1 8 14 7 10 8 1 2 2 11 13 12 C 9 14 T 2 E 12/29/21 E 2 R 2 T 7 S 2 OUTLOT C 2 3 6 2 14 . 0 13 1 300 .. 7 10RYAN M. BLUHMDATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF +07 9 1+ 41 26+ 2 9 2 C 1211 5 2 22 T E E 9 R T 12 77 1 S 21 36 20 13 19 5 1 18 11 17 35 16 C 1414 10 2 G T 5 6 E 23 8 12 7 T E 1 4 1 RE 913 T 15 E 34 S R 8" WATERMAIN T 15 10 8 S 3 16 15 33 3 24 1 7 A SANITARY SEWER (TYP) 6 5 16 7 7 9 17 1 T 11 E I 6 E 14 32 8 R 12 1 T T 18 E 2 17 5 1 S 25 E 8 R 7 13 T 10 4 S 19 7 31 6 4 1 D 18 7 1 1 26 9 T 12 1 20 E 12 E 3 7 1 .9 3. 0 R 30 8 0 3 ++ T 6 8 9 19 2111 1 S 3 7EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 5 27 01 1 22 5 8 529 1 20 10 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 2328 94 2 1 4 7 7 2428 9 21 29 6 3 6 4 1 1 7 2 3 827 1 5 30 22 12 PREPARED FOR: 1 4 0 31 3 7 1 11 7 26 32 23 2 3 12 1 9 6 25 33 1324 2 6 G 1 T E 34 8 2 14 E 6 R 5 7 T 1 S 35 4 15 1 A OUTLOT F 1 T 1 E 7 6 E 3 R T 1 S 223 1 . 6 2 4 1 2 21+ 6 6 D 2 2 0 T B 1 0 1 0 ET 2 E 1 E E R T 20 S R T 18 S 19 9 17 1 9 1822 17 18 9 8 1 17 16 23 2 19 ..... 16 16 24 12/29/21 78 20 1 GAS TANKS 15 25 8 ..... 6 26 1 15 7 21 9 7 14 INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: 27 5 1 B 28 T 14 11 E 7 E R 8 13 T 22 S 6 ... 4 1 6 13 5 G U P 0 12 0 .1 0 0 9 23 3+ G 11 U 4 6 P E S A G 12 T 11 G U P 5 E S A G 8 E G U P 10 R 24 S 3 A G T 2 S 11 10 5 20SEE SHEET 25 DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-UTP01.DWG OUTLOT G MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 OF 600' 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance 32 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 400' 1" = 200' 0030343.00 200' 0' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NUMBER: FORCEMAIN CONNECTION OPTIONS OPTION #1 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 M F (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 M PhoneFax F M F M F FORCEMAIN COTTAGE GROVE, MN M F OPTION #2 MISSISSIPPI LANDING X X X MFMF MF MF MF MFMF FM FM FMFM FM FM O F H O P 41257 S A G O MF F H O P LICENSE NO. S FORCEMAIN A G MINNESOTA O F H 12/29/21 O P S A G RYAN M. BLUHMDATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF O F M F H O P S A G O F | M | F H | O H | P O P | | S | A | G | | | | | | | H O | P H | O P | S | A | G | H O O FP H | O P | S | A EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 G | | X| O 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 F| | H O | P | | 4 O F3 | | 1 M 2 F| PREPARED FOR: | 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 75 + 8 00.05 010+1 95 0 1 5 1 A TEER 5 TS 1 0 4 1 4 5 WATER PUMP M S F A G 2 5 6 7 B 3 2 T 3 E 05 E 1 R T S 2 3 O F 3 02 39 3837 15 X M 1 SF A 456 G 7 4 0 11 5 X B TEERTS 5 0 0 OUTLOT B 0 . 1 OUTLOT A 0 0 + O 0 0 F 56 M 6 F 0 1 1 23 0 46 5 6 S 7 0 A 1 G 1 8 1 WATER PUMP 0 1 6 M F 9 0 1 2 60 1 1 S OH P 1 A 1 X 1S 1 GA G X H H O OP P 3 X FORCEMAIN 6 2 1..... 1 S A G 12/29/21 H O P 3 1 1 6 S GA 4 4 . H O 6 P 4 0 + 3 1 51 ..... 5 06 . 6 5 6 +6 6 INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: 6 ... LIFTSTATION DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-UTP02.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 OF 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance 33 Call 48 Hours before digging: 780775770765760755750745740735730725720715710705 811 or call811.com 735.61 DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 735.6 735.978 78 736.53 738.9 737.45 742.4 77 0030343.00 738.38 745.9 PVI ELEV = 735.50 PVI STA = 78+05.71 739.30 747.9 % 76 5 8 . 1 740.22 - 751.4 770765760755750745740735730725720715710 741.15 PROJECT NUMBER: 745.1 740.2 75 22 744.14 742.07 744.0 744.6 22 743.34 STREET PROFILES 742.99 % 0 748.8 745.0 746 . 1 ELEV = 743.73 742.54 743.90 PVT = 73+60.00 744.0 744.8 21 741.74 744.26 746.6 744.9 PVI ELEV = 744.88 73 PVI STA = 22+46.13 K = 31.19 A.D. = 2.60% 120.00' VCL.P ELEV = 741.31L.P. STA = 19+92.43PVI STA = 20+04.00PVI ELEV = 741.00K = 38.43100.00' VCPVC = 19+54.00ELEV = 741.50PVT = 20+54.00ELEV = 741.80 741.32 743.82 A.D. = -3.85% ELEV = 743.64 745.7 744.9 20 H.P ELEV = 744.26PVI ELEV = 744.84 PVI STA = 73+00.00PVC = 72+40.00 H.P. STA = 73+02.39 741.54 742.84 744.7 744.8 72 742.04 741.84 747.3 747.8 19 742.54 740.84% 0 745.5 741.80 . 71 1 - % 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 0 743.04 739.840 . 2 742.4 737.5 18 743.54 738.84 741.6 736.1 70 (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 743.77 737.84 A.D. = -2.40%90.00' VC H.P ELEV = 743.78H.P. STA = 17+07.43PVI STA = 17+00.00PVI ELEV = 744.04K = 37.57PVC = 16+55.00ELEV = 743.41PVT = 17+45.00ELEV = 743.59 741.2 736.5 17 PhoneFax ELEV = 736.94 743.34 736.84 PVT = 69+05.00 747.0 736.8 69 742.64 736.26 746.6 737.2 % 16 0 4 . K = 36.04 100.00' VC 1 ELEV = 736.33 741.95 A.D. = 2.77% 736.37 PVC = 68+05.00 739.3 L.P ELEV = 736.22 PVI ELEV = 735.94 738.5 L.P. STA = 68+32.92PVI STA = 68+55.0068 741.30 736.75 742.1 740.6 15 A.D. = 2.10% L.P ELEV = 741.11L.P. STA = 14+60.30PVI STA = 14+75.00PVI ELEV = 740.90K = 42.7890.00' VCPVC = 14+30.00ELEV = 741.22PVT = 15+20.00ELEV = 741.53 741.12 737.14 744.8 739.4 67 741.43 737.53 742.2 739.2 14 % 7 7 . 741.79 737.920 - 742.0 740.0 66 % 742.14 738.30 1 7 741.9 . 742.7 COTTAGE GROVE, MN 13 0 - 742.49 738.69 741.7 739.3 MISSISSIPPI LANDING 65 ELEV = 739.05 742.85 739.08 PVT = 64+53.00740.4 738.3 12 743.06 739.03 739.9 736.0 64 A.D. = -4.01% H.P ELEV = 743.07H.P. STA = 11+57.01PVI STA = 11+15.00PVI ELEV = 743.45K = 32.46PVC = 10+50.00ELEV = 741.31PVT = 11+80.00ELEV = 742.99 130.00' VC K = 32.12 742.57 110.00' VC 738.20 ELEV = 738.02 A.D. = -3.42% 740.3 735.9 11 H.P ELEV = 739.15PVI ELEV = 739.48 PVC = 63+43.00 PVI STA = 63+98.00 H.P. STA = 64+28.12 STR-B 41257 741.31 736.88 STR-A 740.4 742.5 63 739.66 735.56 739.2 746.5 10 LICENSE NO. 738.01 734.23 738.9 741.0 62 MINNESOTA % 0 736.36 % 732.91 3 . 5 3 6739.5 12/29/21 9 738.6. 2 734.71 731.58 RYAN M. BLUHMDATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF 735.6 738.7 61 733.07 730.26 ELEV = 732.60 734.3 8 736.1 PVT = 7+86.00 731.53 728.93 734.6 728.9 60 ELEV = 728.27 PVT = 59+75.00 730.42 K = 56.4290.00' VC 727.68 ELEV = 730.35 A.D. = 1.60% 731.1 7 724.7 PVC = 6+96.00 L.P ELEV = 730.35 % PVI ELEV = 731.12 L.P. STA = 6+96.00PVI STA = 7+41.00 0 ELEV = 729.78 7 . 729.58 726.93 PVT = 6+62.001 K = 43.9190.00' VC 728.3 ELEV = 726.81 722.8 59 A.D. = 2.05% PVC = 58+85.00 L.P ELEV = 726.81 PVI ELEV = 727.08 L.P. STA = 58+85.00PVI STA = 59+30.00 728.93 726.60 724.9 6 718.8 90.00' VC K = 90.22 ELEV = 728.69 A.D. = 1.00% PVC = 5+72.00 728.54 726.30L.P ELEV = 728.69PVI ELEV = 729.01 L.P. STA = 5+72.00PVI STA = 6+17.00 720.5 716.9 58 728.19 726.00 723.0 5 716.3 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 727.83 725.70 723.67500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 719.1 57 727.48 725.40 714.4 4 715.2 727.13 725.10 715.7 712.3 % 56 0 7 . PREPARED FOR: 0 726.78 724.80 717.2 3 710.8 726.43 724.50 715.3 713.3 55 726.07 724.20 %713.9 2 712.4 0 6 . 0PVI STA = 1+00.00PVI ELEV = 725.37 725.72 723.90 713.8 714.1 54 725.37 723.60 714.71 716.2 723.30 770765760755750745740735730725720715710 716.9 53 723.00 717.4 722.70 718.9 52 ..... 722.40 12/29/21 721.0 722.10 ..... 722.5 51 INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: 721.80 PVI STA = 50+00.00PVI ELEV = 721.50 724.9 721.50 ... 725.4 50 ### #### OR 780775770765760755750745740735730725720715710705 ### DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-DTP01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 OF 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance 770765760755750745740735730725720715710 34 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com 742.7 DATE: 740.6929SHEET NUMBER: 741.9 % 740.39 0 6 744.0 . 29 0 740.09 ELEV = 740.06 745.3 770765760755750745740735730 PVT = 28+45.00 0030343.00 741.98 741.9 739.94 PVI ELEV = 740.81 746.2 PVI STA = 29+70.42 28 741.68 90.00' VC742.6 K = 66.77 ELEV = 740.13 740.16 A.D. = 1.35% PVC = 27+55.00 744.8 L.P ELEV = 739.94 PVI ELEV = 739.79 L.P. STA = 28+05.04PVI STA = 28+00.00741.38 742.2 2 740.54 744.3 27 741.08 741.9 PROJECT NUMBER: 740.91 744.5 740.78 PVI STA = 1+00.00PVI ELEV = 741.98 741.7 3 741.29 744.2 26 740.48 % 5 742.6 STREET PROFILES 7 . 741.66 0 - 743.7 740.18 741.5 4 742.04 % 0 742.0 25 6 . 739.87 0 - 740.4 742.41 742.3 739.57 738.6 5 742.79 744.3 STR-E 24 739.27 737.7 742.94 A.D. = -2.51% H.P ELEV = 742.96H.P. STA = 23+63.10PVI STA = 23+45.00PVI ELEV = 743.20K = 35.9090.00' VCPVC = 23+00.00ELEV = 742.41PVT = 23+90.00ELEV = 742.86 746.5 738.97 737.5 6 742.41 746.6 23 738.67 737.6 741.53 750.2 738.37 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 738.3 7 740.65 PVI STA = 7+54.97PVI ELEV = 738.04 745.0 22 738.07 738.7 739.77 746.2 7 (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 % 6 738.89 7 . 1 765755745735 749.7 770760750740730 21 PhoneFax 738.01 739.6 737.14 739.6 20 736.26 ELEV = 736.08 738.2 PVT = 19+40.00 735.59 770765760755750745740735730725720715 727.15 736.9 19 722.2 722.2 19 19 K = 37.7090.00' VC 735.57ELEV = 735.57 A.D. = 2.39% 726.44 735.7 PVC = 18+50.00 L.P ELEV = 735.50 PVI ELEV = 735.29 720.3 % L.P. STA = 18+73.74PVI STA = 18+95.00 2 4 . 735.89 1 725.73 730.6 18 721.1 ELEV = 725.45 18 PVT = 17+80.00 736.20 % 3 725.14 730.0 6 . PVI ELEV = 727.16 719.5 0 PVI STA = 19+00.37 - 736.52 COTTAGE GROVE, MN 725.16 725.1 17 719.1 K = 37.67 17 110.00' VC A.D. = 2.92% ELEV = 725.50 ELEV = 736.83 736.83 L.P ELEV = 725.07 PVI ELEV = 724.67 PVC = 16+70.00 725.80L.P. STA = 17+26.51 PVI STA = 17+25.00 MISSISSIPPI LANDING 727.2PVT = 16+51.00 719.4 % 0 736.88 5 . 726.54 1 723.2 - 16 721.0 ELEV = 726.84 16 90.00' VC K = 47.87 ELEV = 736.55 PVT = 15+80.00 A.D. = -1.88% 736.41 PVC = 15+61.00 727.34 PVI ELEV = 737.11 H.P ELEV = 736.92 722.9 PVI STA = 16+06.00 H.P. STA = 16+20.85 723.3 735.78 728.33 724.4 90.00' VC 15ELEV = 728.56 K = 112.39 729.6 A.D. = 0.80% 15 PVC = 14+90.00 41257 L.P ELEV = 726.84 PVI ELEV = 727.52 735.16 L.P. STA = 15+80.00PVI STA = 15+35.00 729.48 725.8 STR-C 731.0 734.53 730.63 727.7 14 734.3 LICENSE NO. 14 733.91 731.78 729.4 MINNESOTA 740.8 733.28 12/29/21 732.93 732.8 13 747.7 13 RYAN M. BLUHMDATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF 732.66 734.08 734.3 750.9 % 0 732.03 3 . 735.23 735.3 2 12 - 741.1 12 731.41 736.38 733.6 % 737.7 5 2 . 730.78 1 737.53 730.7 11 739.4 11 730.16 738.68 730.2 738.4 729.53 739.83 730.0 10 741.5 10 728.91 740.98 729.9 750.1 728.28 741.84 729.4 9EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 STR-D 743.2 9 727.66 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 742.26 728.8 744.1 727.03 K = 52.9290.00' VC 742.56 729.5 8 743.6 8 A.D. = -1.70% ELEV = 742.17ELEV = 740.86 PVT = 9+55.00 PVC = 8+65.00 726.41 PVI ELEV = 741.90 H.P ELEV = 742.17 742.86PVI STA = 9+10.00 728.7H.P. STA = 8+65.00 743.3 % PREPARED FOR: 0 ELEV = 725.786 725.78 . 0 743.16 724.5 PVT = 7+00.00- 7 744.0 7 725.46 743.46 722.9 748.7 90.00' VC K = 40.98 ELEV = 725.65 A.D. = 2.20% 725.74 PVC = 6+10.00 743.76 L.P ELEV = 725.46 PVI ELEV = 725.22 723.4 L.P. STA = 6+48.76PVI STA = 6+55.006 741.5 6 726.21 743.89 722.7 741.6 726.69 743.61 722.2 5 739.9 5 727.16 743.16 719.7 738.6 90.00' VC K = 60.00 727.63 742.71A.D. = -1.50% ELEV = 743.66ELEV = 743.79 718.7 4 PVT = 5+95.00 PVC = 5+05.00 743.9 4 PVI ELEV = 744.06 H.P ELEV = 743.90 PVI STA = 5+50.00 H.P. STA = 5+59.00 % 728.11 5 742.26 9 716.7 . 0 739.6 - ..... 12/29/21 728.58 741.81 % 725.5 3 0 739.8 3 9 . 0 729.05 ..... 741.36 724.6 740.4 INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: 729.52 740.91 728.9 2 740.0 2 730.00 ... 740.46 PVI STA = 1+00.00PVI ELEV = 730.47 733.8 PVI STA = 1+00.00PVI ELEV = 740.01 ### 740.5 #### OR 730.47 740.01 737.11 ### 741.21 770765760755750745740735730725720715710 770765760755750745740735730725720715 DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-DTP01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 OF 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance 35 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 775770765760755750745740735 741.00 744.2 741.38 0030343.00 744.4 741.75 742.6 2 742.13 745.1 PVI STA = 1+00.00PVI ELEV = 741.00 742.50 744.8 3 PROJECT NUMBER: 742.88 % 745.4 5 7 . 0 743.25 743.0 4 STREET PROFILES 743.63 750.1 744.00 748.3 5 744.38 STR-I 742.2 744.75 742.4 6 ELEV = 744.90 PVC = 6+20.00 745.05 742.1 744.94 90.00' VC K = 57.33 ELEV = 744.87 742.6 7 A.D. = -1.57% PVT = 7+10.00 PVI ELEV = 745.24 H.P ELEV = 745.06 PVI STA = 6+65.00 H.P. STA = 6+63.03 744.54 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 742.5 % 2 8 . 744.13 0 - 744.7 8 PVI STA = 8+38.31PVI ELEV = 743.82 743.82 (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 750.8 8 775770765760755750745740735 PhoneFax 775770765760755750745740735730 4 PVI ELEV = 739.40 PVI STA = 3+76.04 739.60 % 5 7 780775770765760755750745740735730 . ELEV = 739.81742.79 0 - 746.5 PVT = 3+21.00743.22 19 739.92 747.9 738.5 319 744.47 739.80 750.8 736.790.00' VC K = 46.19% ELEV = 739.61 0 A.D. = -1.95% 5 . PVC = 2+31.00 2 PVI ELEV = 740.15 H.P ELEV = 739.94 745.72 PVI STA = 2+76.00 H.P. STA = 2+86.37- 739.24 753.3 736.0 218 % 746.97 0 COTTAGE GROVE, MN 738.64ELEV = 747.12 2 PVI ELEV = 742.79 . STR-H 749.4 PVI STA = 19+17.31 737.9 1PVT = 17+44.00 PVI STA = 1+00.00PVI ELEV = 738.04 747.91 738.04 MISSISSIPPI LANDING 746.4 738.6 117 K = 31.26 748.06 100.00' VC ELEV = 748.02 A.D. = -3.20% 748.8 775765755745735 770760750740730 PVC = 16+44.00 H.P ELEV = 748.10PVI ELEV = 748.37 PVI STA = 16+94.00 H.P. STA = 16+65.89 747.71 751.4 16 747.36 749.1 41257 747.01 743.9 15 780775770765760755750745740735730 743.41 746.66 741.0 63 744.1 LICENSE NO. 743.16 739.0 746.31 63 MINNESOTA 748.8 14 % 742.86 0 6 . 739.2 745.96 12/29/21 0 % 0 744.8 7 . 742.560 RYAN M. BLUHMDATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF 741.5 745.61 A.D. = 1.75%62 90.00' VC L.P ELEV = 742.35L.P. STA = 61+49.24PVI STA = 61+35.00PVI ELEV = 742.17K = 51.47PVC = 60+90.00ELEV = 742.69PVT = 61+80.00ELEV = 742.44 743.2 PVI ELEV = 743.41 13 PVI STA = 63+42.45 742.35 742.1 745.26 741.7 742.58 740.2 744.91 61 740.4 12 % 743.15 5 1 737.8. 744.56 1 - 742.0 743.65 736.2 744.21 60 A.D. = -2.85% H.P ELEV = 743.69H.P. STA = 59+84.64PVI STA = 59+76.00PVI ELEV = 744.00K = 31.5990.00' VCPVC = 59+31.00ELEV = 743.24PVT = 60+21.00ELEV = 743.48 740.6 11 743.50 ELEV = 743.90 735.7 743.86 ELEV = 743.13 PVT = 10+55.00 % 739.6 0 PVT = 59+25.00 7 . 742.79 1 736.3 743.73 59 741.6 10 90.00' VC 742.58K = 69.24 ELEV = 743.85 A.D. = 1.30% K = 39.1790.00' VC ELEV = 742.64 737.4 743.94 PVC = 9+65.00 A.D. = 2.30% % L.P ELEV = 743.73 PVI ELEV = 743.58 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 PVC = 58+35.00 L.P. STA = 10+06.51 0743.9PVI STA = 10+10.00 L.P ELEV = 742.57 PVI ELEV = 742.376 . PVI STA = 58+80.00 L.P. STA = 58+58.50 742.79 0 - 737.7 744.24 STR-G 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 58 743.8 9 742.44 738.6 744.54 744.5 741.5090.00' VC K = 34.62 % 739.3 744.84 570 A.D. = -2.60%6 ELEV = 742.73 ELEV = 742.10. 748.0 8 0 PVT = 58+20.00 PVC = 57+30.00% - PREPARED FOR: 740.50 0 H.P ELEV = 742.79PVI ELEV = 743.00 0 . 739.3 PVI STA = 57+75.00745.14 2 H.P. STA = 57+99.23 749.9 739.50 ELEV = 739.40 739.3 745.44 PVT = 55+95.0056 745.3 STR-F 7 738.61 738.9 745.74 ELEV = 745.75 744.3 PVT = 6+48.00 90.00' VC K = 90.00 ELEV = 738.05 738.00 A.D. = 1.00% PVC = 55+05.00 738.6 745.81 L.P ELEV = 738.05 PVI ELEV = 738.50 55 L.P. STA = 55+05.00PVI STA = 55+50.00 749.3 6 737.50 90.00' VC K = 51.59 ELEV = 745.50 739.1 745.41 A.D. = -1.74% PVC = 5+58.00 742.0 PVI ELEV = 746.02 H.P ELEV = 745.84 PVI STA = 6+03.00 H.P. STA = 6+17.07 737.00 738.1 744.84 54 739.7 5 736.50 737.8 744.27 740.5 736.00 737.5 743.70% 53 5 741.6 14 . 1..... 735.50 % 12/29/21 0 737.0 743.12 0 . 1 736.3 735.00 734.5 742.55 ..... 52 742.4 3 734.50 INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: ELEV = 742.04 732.7 741.98 PVT = 2+55.00 738.9 734.00 731.9 741.77 51... 738.1 2 ### PVI STA = 50+00.00PVI ELEV = 733.00 PVI STA = 1+00.00PVI ELEV = 742.62#### 90.00' VC 733.50K = 41.96 ELEV = 741.97 OR A.D. = 2.15% 731.8 742.12 PVC = 1+65.00 L.P ELEV = 741.76 PVI ELEV = 741.52 L.P. STA = 2+06.96PVI STA = 2+10.00### 737.7 % 0 733.00 0 . 1 733.2 742.62 - 50 736.41 780775770765760755750745740735730 780775770765760755750745740735730 DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-DTP01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 OF 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance 36 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 0030343.00 PROJECT NUMBER: DETAILS 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 PhoneFax COTTAGE GROVE, MN MISSISSIPPI LANDING 41257 LICENSE NO. MINNESOTA 12/29/21 RYAN M. BLUHMDATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 PREPARED FOR: ..... 12/29/21 ..... INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: ... ### #### OR ### DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-DTP02.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 OF 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance 37 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 0030343.00 PROJECT NUMBER: DETAILS 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 PhoneFax COTTAGE GROVE, MN MISSISSIPPI LANDING 41257 LICENSE NO. MINNESOTA 12/29/21 RYAN M. BLUHMDATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 PREPARED FOR: ..... 12/29/21 ..... INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: ... ### #### OR ### DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-DTP02.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 OF 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance 38 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 0030343.00 PROJECT NUMBER: DETAILS ... (F) DIAMETER ... 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 (E) OUTLET SIZE (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 ... ELEVATION (D) OUTLET PhoneFax ... ELEVATION (C) SKIMMER ... (B) SUMP ELEVATION .. - ELEV. TOP OF WALL .. - COTTAGE GROVE, MN ORIFICE SIZE MISSISSIPPI LANDING (D,E) .. - ORIFICE ELEVATION ... (F) (B) (A) RIM ELEVATION 41257 (C) ... POND # LICENSE NO. MINNESOTA ... (A) OCS # 12/29/21 RYAN M. BLUHMDATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 PREPARED FOR: ..... 12/29/21 ..... INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: ... ### #### OR ### DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-DTP02.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 OF 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance 39 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 0030343.00 L ROADWAYL ROADWAY CC 15'15' ENGINEERED FILLENGINEERED FILL 1'1' PROJECT NUMBER: 11 :: 11 DETAILS 14'14' R.O.WR.O.W SUITABLE BEARING SOIL(TYP.)SUITABLE BEARING SOIL(TYP.) 22'22' 11 :: 11 FINISHED GRADE AFTER HOUSEFINISHED GRADE FOR PADFINISHED GRADE AFTER HOUSEFINISHED GRADE FOR PAD 3'3' SETBACKSETBACK EE ENGINEERED FILLENGINEERED FILL DD AA RR GG N.T.S. BB N.T.S. UU SS OO 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 TT '' 50 .. 30'30' 22 SPLIT ENTRY (SE) L I GARAGE FLOOR EL.GARAGE FLOOR EL. O S P O (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 T ' 5 . SPLIT ENTRY WALKOUT (SEWO) 0 HOLD DOWN DETAILS L PhoneFax I O S P O T ' 5 . 0 35'35' BASEMENT FLOOR EL. OF GROUND 0.0 FEETBELOW GARAGE SLABUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EL. OF GROUND 4.5 FEETBELOW GARAGE SLABUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. BASEMENT FLOOR (FB & SE ONLY) 3'3' ENGINEERED FILL L I O S 1 1 P:: 1 1 O T ' ' 17' MIN.(VARIES)17' MIN.(VARIES)7 5 . 6 . 0 0 SUITABLE BEARING SOILSUITABLE BEARING SOIL(TYP.) (TYP.) ' 7 6 . 0 X A . M X N 1 A COTTAGE GROVE, MN : A 3 L M P ENGINEERED FILL 1 N: E 3 A E L S P E E MISSISSIPPI LANDING S 41257 LICENSE NO. MINNESOTA 12/29/21 RYAN M. BLUHMDATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF 15'15' 1' ENGINEERED FILL 1'1' ENGINEERED FILLENGINEERED FILL 14' 14'14' R.O.W R.O.WR.O.W LIMITSLIMITS HOLD DOWNHOLD DOWN SUITABLE BEARING SOIL (TYP.) SUITABLE BEARING SOIL (TYP.)SUITABLE BEARING SOIL (TYP.) VARIES 22' (TYP.) 22' (TYP.)22' (TYP.) EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 FINISHED GRADE AFTER HOUSE FINISHED GRADE FOR PAD 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 FINISHED GRADE FOR PADFINISHED GRADE FOR PAD FINISHED GRADE AFTER HOUSEFINISHED GRADE AFTER HOUSE 3' ENGINEERED FILL ENGINEERED FILLENGINEERED FILL PREPARED FOR: N.T.S.N.T.S. N.T.S. 30'GARAGE FLOOR EL. 1.50' TO SUBGRADE GARAGE FLOOR EL.GARAGE FLOOR EL. 30'30' 3.00' TO SUBGRADE3.00' TO SUBGRADE 0.5' TOPSOIL 0.5' TOPSOIL0.5' TOPSOIL SINGLE FAMILY - LOOK-OUT (LO) SINGLE FAMILY - WALK-OUT (WO) HOLD DOWN DETAILS 65' HOUSE PAD 65' HOUSE PAD65' HOUSE PAD SINGLE FAMILY - SLAB ON GRADE (SOG) 35' 35'35' BASEMENT FLOOR BASEMENT FLOORBASEMENT FLOOR EL. OF GROUNDAT LOOKOUT 5.4'BELOW GARAGE SLABUNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.EL. OF GROUNDAT WALKOUT 8.7'BELOW GARAGE SLABUNLESS OTHERWISENOTED. ..... 12/29/21 5'5' ENGINEERED FILLENGINEERED FILL ..... ENGINEERED FILL (VARIES) 17' (MIN.) INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: (VARIES)(VARIES) 17' (MIN.)17' (MIN.) SUITABLE BEARING SOIL (TYP.) SUITABLE BEARING SOIL (TYP.)SUITABLE BEARING SOIL (TYP.) 0.67'0.67'... ### #### 0.5' TOPSOIL0.5' TOPSOIL OR ### DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-DTP02.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 750' 66 OF 500' 12/29/21 250' Common Ground Alliance 40 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com 1" = DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 250' 0' 0030343.00 H 20' W 20' H 50' W 30' PROJECT NUMBER: MATURE SIZE H 50' W 35'-40' H 60' W 30'-40'H 60' W 30'-40' H 50'-75' W 50' H 12'-15' W 6'-8' H 70' W 40'-50' H 50'-60' W 40' H 30'-40' W 20'-30'H 60'-80' W 25'-30'H 40'-60' W 15'-30'H 60'-80' W 25'-30'H 15'-20' W 15'-20'H 25'-30' W 20'-25'H 15'-25' W 15'-25'H 40'-60' W 20'-30' H 50'-80' W 30'-40' H 40'-50' W 35'-40' H 50'-70' W 40'-50'H 50'-70' W 40'-50' H 50'-60' W 40'-50'H 60'-80' W 40'-60' LANDSCAPE PLAN AS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWN AS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWN AS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWN SPACING O.C. OVERALL PRELIMINARY TOTAL AREA (5.2 AC)TOTAL AREA (2.4 AC)TOTAL AREA (2.7 AC) MESIC PRAIRIE GENERALSEED MIX (35-241)DENOTES STORMWATERNATIVE SEED MIX (33-261)DENOTES WET MEADOW S & WSEED MIX (34-271) SIZE 6' HT., BB 1.75"/2.5" BB1.75"/2.5" BB1.75"/2.5" BB1.75"/2.5" BB1.75"/2.5" BB1.75"/2.5" BB1.75"/2.5" BB1.75"/2.5" BB1.75"/2.5" BB1.75"/2.5" BB1.75"/2.5" BB1.75"/2.5" BB6' HT., BB6' HT., BB6' HT., BB6' HT., BB6' HT., BB2" BB6' HT., BB CLUMP6' HT., BB CLUMP2" BB2" BB * ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE* ALL DISTURBED AREAS IN GRAY CLOUD TRAIL & 103RD STREET(25-141) R.O.W. TO BE SEEDED WITH MESIC GENERAL ROADSIDE SEED MIX NATIVE SEEDING LEGEND 48 TREES 346 TREES 223 TREES 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 376 TREES 605 TREES 70 TREES 123 TREES 1,673 TREES 1,450 TREES 1,056 TREES 3,120 SHRUBS 1,628 TREES 1,673 TREES (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 499 TREES QUANTITIES ON PLAN SUPERSEDE LIST QUANTITIES IN THE EVENT OF A DISCREPANCY. REFER TO FINAL LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR SPECIES LOCATIONS AND QUANTITIES. TREES MARKED WITH A + INDICATED LIMITEDUSE SPECIES AND ARE NOT USED ON BOULEVARD. PhoneFax Northern Pin Oak / Quercus ellipsoidalisSwamp White Oak / Quercus bicolorSt. Croix Elm / Ulmus americana 'St. Croix'Yellowwood / Cladrastis kentuckeaKentucky Coffeetree / Gymnocladus dioicusBlack Hills Spruce / Picea glauca densataNorway Spruce / Picea abiesColorado Spruce / Picea pungensWhite Pine / Pinus strobus +Sienna Glen Maple / Acer x freemanii 'Sienna'Skyline Honeylocust / Gleditsia tricanthos var. inermis 'Skycole'White Oak / Quercus albaRed Oak / Quercus rubraAccolade Elm / Ulmus japonica x wilsoniana 'Morton'Autumn Gold Ginkgo / Ginkgo biloba 'Autumn Gold'Hackberry / Celtis occidentalisTechny Arborvitae / Thuja occidentalis 'Techny'Thornless Cockspur Hawthorn / Crataegus crusgalli 'Inermis'Japanese Tree Lilac / Syringa reticulataAllegheny Serviceberry / Amelanchier laevisQuaking Aspen / Populus tremuloidesSpring Snow Crab / Malus 'Spring Snow' Norway Pine / Pinus resinosaNOTES: COMMON/BOTANICAL NAME (48 LOTS) 7011 376605123499 QTY. (264 LOTS) SYMBOL 4886.15 INCHES = 1,955 TREES BLOCK 1: LOTS 1-12, 17-19, 22-25BLOCK 10: LOTS 1-3, 5-8, 10-16BLOCK 11: LOTS 1-4BLOCK 12: LOTS 26-36327 TREES - 104 TREES (LIFESTYLE COMMUNITIES) = 223 TREES 1,955 TREES REQUIRED - 1,628 TREES (EXISTING CREDIT) = 327 TREES LOCATED THROUGHOUT OUT-LOTS AND SINGLE FAMILY BUFFER TEN UNDERSTORY SHRUBS INSTALLED PER LOT (BY BUILDER)313 LOTS TOTAL, (33 CORNER LOTS) 1 TO BE CONIFEROUS TREESTREES TREES LARGESMALL ** OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS STREET TREES:OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS YARD TREES:CONIFEROUS YARD TREES:OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS BUFFER TREES:CONIFEROUS BUFFER TREES: FUTURE4 TREES PER LOT MINIMUM******(SEE TREE INVENTORY: 1,628 QUALIFYING TREES SAVED)SEE TREE PRESERVATION PLAN AND TREE INVENTORY FOR COMPLETE CALCULATIONS- 2.5 CAL. IN. PER DECIDUOUS TREE- 2 CAL. IN. PER 6' EVERGREEN TREE BUFFER10 SHRUBS PER LOTFOR LOTS THAT UTILIZE EXISTING TREES, ONLY ONE YARD TREE SHALLBE PROVIDED. THESE LOTS ARE AS FOLLOW:1 BOULEVARD TREE PER LOT , 2 BLVD TREES @ CORNER LOTSEXISTING QUALIFYING TREES MAY BE CREDITED TOWARD THEREQUIRED TREES DETAILED IN THIS SECTION AT A RATE OF 1:1REPLACEMENT TREES TO BE: FUTURE OVERSTORYDECIDUOUS OVERSTORYDECIDUOUSEVERGREENOVERSTORY EVERGREEN STREET TREES TREES SHALL BE PLANTED 5' FROM BACK OF CURB IN A LOCATION THAT DOES NOT INTERFERE WITH CURBSTOPS OR INDIVIDUAL SEWER & WATER CONNECTIONS. STREET TREE LOCATIONS AND SPACING ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON CONSTRUCTED DRIVEWAY AND UTILITY LOCATIONS.NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA.DECIDUOUS TREES SHOULD BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 5' OFF ANY UTILITY PIPE AND CONIFEROUS TREES TREES SHOULD BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 15' OFF ANY UTILITY PIPE.NO TREE SHOULD BE LOCATED WITHIN 10' OF A HYDRANT OR 15' FROM A STREETLIGHT.NO TREES SHOULD BE LOCATED WITHIN A STORM POND HWL.NO TREES SHOULD BE LOCATED WITHIN STORM POND ACCESS ROUTE.NO DECIDUOUS TREE WITH 5' OF A SIDEWALK OR TRAIL AND NO CONIFEROUS TREES WITHIN 20' OF A PROPOSED SIDEWALK OR TRAIL. ***** ****** TREES (BY BUILDER) SINGLE FAMILY PROVISIONSTREE REPLACEMENT PROVISIONS TREES (BY BUILDER)TOTAL LANDSCAPE REQUIRED:SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS (312 LOTS) SINGLE FAMILY STREET TREE SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS:TREE PRESERVATION REPLACEMENT: TOTAL LANDSCAPING PROVIDED: EXISTING TREES PRESERVED CREDIT: REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED: 4. 2.3.5.6.7.8. NOTES:1. PRELIMINARY PLANT SCHEDULELANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTSLANDSCAPE PROVISIONS COTTAGE GROVE, MN MISSISSIPPI LANDING . FM LICENSE NO. | | | H | O P | MINNESOTA | | | | H| O P | 12/29/21 | | FM| | | H OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM AOF THE STATE OF .DATE: O|I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEDULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS P | | | | | H | O P | | | FM | | H O P | | | | | | H O P FM H O P H O P FMH O P H O P FM EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 H O P 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 H MO FP PREPARED FOR: M F M F M F M F POH H O P H ..... O P 12/29/21 ..... H O P INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: H O P ... 25' 250' OR 50' DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-PPL01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 150' 66 OF 100' 12/29/21 50' Common Ground Alliance 41 Call 48 Hours before digging: 1" = 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 50' 0' 0030343.00 H O P 7 H O P PROJECT NUMBER: 6 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN 5 4 4 3 1 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 2 (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 16 1 PhoneFax 4 5 6 8 7 3 COTTAGE GROVE, MN 2 MISSISSIPPI LANDING 2 39 3837 36 . 1 LICENSE NO. MINNESOTA OUTLOT B 12/29/21 OUTLOT A .DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF 1 7 M 2 3 F 6 4 5 M F M F 1 M F M F EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 M F M F PREPARED FOR: 1 15 ..... 12/29/21 ..... INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: ... 5' OR 10' 50.000001' DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-PPL01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 150' 66 OF 100' 12/29/21 50' Common Ground Alliance 42 Call 48 Hours before digging: 1" = 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 50' 0' 0030343.00 1 15 25 14 26 PROJECT NUMBER: 2 13 27 PRELIMINARY 12 LANDSCAPE PLAN 28 11 10 6 9 6 29 8 7 30 5 31 4 2 32 33 8 34 3 35 38 37 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 36 (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 132 PhoneFax 14 1 12 11 15 10 7 9 6 5 8 16 1 1 30 COTTAGE GROVE, MN 17 MISSISSIPPI LANDING 31 18 . 19 LICENSE NO. MINNESOTA 20 12/29/21 .DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF 21 22 23 4 1 24 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 25 3 PREPARED FOR: 2 S A G S A G 1 OUTLOT I ..... 12/29/21 ..... INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: ... 5' OR 10' 50.000001' DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-PPL01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 150' 66 OF 100' 12/29/21 50' Common Ground Alliance 43 Call 48 Hours before digging: 1" = 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 50' 0' 0030343.00 | | H O P| | | | | | H O| P | | | | | H| O P | | | PROJECT NUMBER: | | | H O | P | | | | | H O | P PRELIMINARY | | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN | H | O P | | | | | | H O P | | | | | | H O | P | | | | | H | O P | | | | | | H O P | | | | | | H O | P | | | | | H O| P | | | | | H 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 O| P | H O P OUTLOT C H O(952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 P H O P PhoneFax H O P H O P H O P H O P H O P 1 10 2 5 20 9 8 3 COTTAGE GROVE, MN 19 MISSISSIPPI LANDING 7 6 4 5 18 . 4 OUTLOT C 17 LICENSE NO. MINNESOTA 21 16 12/29/21 22 .DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF 15 23 14 24 13 6 12 2 4 11 12 1 10 11 9 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 10 8 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 9 13 7 8 3 14 7 PREPARED FOR: 6 15 6 5 16 5 4 17 21 18 4 20 3 19 19 4 3 3 ..... 20 12/29/21 18 22 2 2 ..... 17 23 2 INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: 1 16 24 ... 1 5' OR 10' 15 25 50.000001' 14 26 2 13 27 DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-PPL01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 150' 66 OF 100' 12/29/21 50' Common Ground Alliance 44 Call 48 Hours before digging: 1" = 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 50' 0' 0030343.00 2 5 7 OUTLOT F 35 4 3 1 PROJECT NUMBER: 2 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN 1 18 17 22 17 18 16 19 16 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 20 15 (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 15 7 PhoneFax 21 9 14 14 11 8 13 22 6 13 12 9 23 12 11 COTTAGE GROVE, MN 8 10 24 MISSISSIPPI LANDING 11 10 25 11 10 . 9 26 9 LICENSE NO. 8 MINNESOTA 27 12/29/21 8 7.DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF 28 7 6 30 29 9 6 11 5 31 2 3 4 1 5 4 3 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 2 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 1 HO P POH POH POH POH POH H O P PREPARED FOR: H O P H O P 10 9 H O 11 P 15 1416 13 12 H O P 8 H O P 10 ..... H O 12/29/21 7 P 6 ..... 5 H O P INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: 10 H ... O 5' P H O OR P 10' 50.000001' H O P H O P H O P DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-PPL01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 150' 66 OF 100' 12/29/21 50' Common Ground Alliance 45 Call 48 Hours before digging: 1" = 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 50' 0' 0030343.00 | | | | H | O P | | | | | | H O P | | | | PROJECT NUMBER: | | H O| P | | | | | H | O P | PRELIMINARY | | | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN H O P| | | | | | H O | P | | | | | H | O P | | | | | | H O P | | | | | | H O | P | | | | | H | O P | | | | | | H O P| | | | | | H | O P 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 | | | | | | H O P | | | | | | H (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 O | P | | | | | H | O P | | PhoneFax | | | | | | | | | | 13 COTTAGE GROVE, MN 1 19 20 2 18 MISSISSIPPI LANDING 3 17 4 5 16 6 7 8 15 . 5 14 LICENSE NO. MINNESOTA 13 12/29/21 1211 22 .DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF 12 21 20 13 19 1118 17 16 14 10 23 9 15 10 16 15 24 6 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 9 17 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 14 18 25 8 7 13 19 PREPARED FOR: 7 26 12 20 6 2111 27 5 10 28 4 7 9 29 6 3 6 ..... 2 12/29/21 8 5 30 ..... 4 31 INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: 7 32... 5' 3 12 OR 10' 50.000001' 33 6 34 2 5 7 OUTLOT F DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: 35 N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-PPL01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 150' 66 OF 100' 12/29/21 50' Common Ground Alliance 46 Call 48 Hours before digging: 1" = 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 50' 0' 0030343.00 PROJECT NUMBER: PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 17 OUTLOT C 16 (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 5 6 15 PhoneFax 7 13 8 9 14 10 11 13 12 36 19 18 COTTAGE GROVE, MN 17 35 16 14 MISSISSIPPI LANDING 12 13 34 15 . 15 33 16 11 LICENSE NO. 14 32 12 MINNESOTA 17 12/29/21 13 10 .DATE: 31 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF 18 12 9 30 19 8 29 20 7 28 21 6 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 27 5 22 4 26 PREPARED FOR: 23 12 25 24 OUTLOT F ..... 12/29/21 ..... INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: ... 5' OR 10' 50.000001' DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-PPL01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 OF 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance 47 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 0030343.00 PROJECT NUMBER: NOTES & DETAILS PRELIMINARY PLANTING 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 PhoneFax ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC.ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES.ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES.ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY, HEALTHY BRANCHING AND LEAFING.THAN 5:3. CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER AND A HEIGHT TO WIDTH RATIO OF NO LESS CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT COMMON GROUND ALLIANCE AT 811 OR CALL811.COM TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OFALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTS OR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL.ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SITE CONDITIONS.ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF ANY BIDAND/OR QUOTE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THE GUARANTEE BEGINS ON THEALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE, MINNESOTA-GROWN AND/OR HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADE SHALL ADHERE TO,TEMPORARY ONLY.WHEN THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLYABOVE FINISHED GRADE.OPEN TOP OF BURLAP ON BB MATERIALS; REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAK APART PEAT POTS.WRAP ALL SMOOTH-BARKED TREES - FASTEN TOP AND BOTTOM. REMOVE BY APRIL 1ST.THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING.AND TO BE EXISTING TOP SOIL FROM SITE FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS LARGER THAN ONE INCH, SUBSOIL DEBRIS, ANDALL PLANTS WITHIN TURF AREAS. PERENNIAL AND ORNAMENTAL GRASS BEDS SHALL HAVE 2" DEPTH SHREDDEDCONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE).AS INDICATED. POLY EDGING SHALL BE PLACED WITH SMOOTH CURVES AND STAKED WITH METAL SPIKES NOGREATER THAN 4 FOOT ON CENTER WITH BASE OF TOP BEAD AT GRADE, FOR MOWERS TO CUT ABOVE WITHOUTALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PARKING LOT ISLANDS TO BECONTRACTOR. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FORAPPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OPERATION MANUALS,AS-BUILT PLANS, AND NORMAL PROGRAMMING. SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTUPCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PLANT IS FULLYAFTER ALL PLANTING HAVE BEEN INSTALLED. BLANKET TO BE ONE SEASON GEOJUTE, MN/DOT CATEGORY 2OTHER PROJECT PLANTING MULCH. PLACE 4" DEPTH OF MULCH AT ALL PLANTING AND EROSION CONTROL NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THEIMMEDIATE AREA.DATE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S OR OWNER'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING.REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONE YEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING.BUT IS NOT LIMITED BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS:PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1-2014 OR MOST CURRENT VERSION)REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED.PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MNLA & ANSI STANDARD PLANTING PRACTICES.PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL-IN MATERIALS IF NECESSARY;PRIOR TO PLANTING, FIELD VERIFY THAT THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR IS LOCATED AT THE TOP OF THE BALLED &BURLAP TREE. IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED DOWN TO THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR.PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY - PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POOR BRANCHING OFEXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES.STAKING OF TREES AS REQUIRED; REPOSITION, PLUMB AND STAKE IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONE YEAR.LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THE NEED OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS.BACKFILL SOIL AND TOPSOIL TO ADHERE TO MN/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3877 (SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW)LARGE WEEDS UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. MINIMUM 4" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12"DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR TREE, SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS.MULCH TO BE AT ALL TREE, SHRUB, PERENNIAL, AND MAINTENANCE AREAS. TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING BEDSSHALL HAVE 4" DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO BE USED AROUNDHARDWOOD MULCH. MULCH TO BE FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIAL AND COLORED RED, OR APPROVED EQUAL.ROCK MULCH TO BE BUFF LIMESTONE, 1 1/2" TO 3" DIAMETER, AT MINIMUM 3" DEPTH, OR APPROVED EQUAL.ROCK MULCH TO BE ON COMMERCIAL GRADE FILTER FABRIC, BY TYPAR, OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH NO EXPOSURE.MULCH AND FABRIC TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. MULCH TO MATCH EXISTINGEDGING TO BE COMMERCIAL GRADE VALLEY-VIEW BLACK DIAMOND (OR EQUAL) POLY EDGING OR SPADED EDGE,DAMAGE. UTILIZE CURBS AND SIDEWALKS FOR EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE. SPADED EDGE TO PROVIDE V-SHAPEDDEPTH AND WIDTH TO CREATE SEPARATION BETWEEN MULCH AND GRASS. INDIVIDUAL TREE, SHRUB, ORRAIN-GARDEN BEDS TO BE SPADED EDGE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. EDGING TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS(WHERE APPLICABLE).SODDED WITH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH AROUND ALL TREES AND SHRUBS. SOD TO BE STANDARDMINNESOTA GROWN AND HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX, FREE OF LAWN WEEDS. ALL TOPSOIL AREAS TO BE RAKED TOREMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSURE DRAINAGE. SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER SHALL BE STAKED. SEED AS SPECIFIED ANDPER MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS. IF NOT INDICATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN.PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL PLANTED AREAS ON SITE. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN/BUILD BY LANDSCAPEDURING FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. SYSTEM SHALL HAVE ONE-YEAR WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR. ALLINFORMATION ABOUT INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR.ESTABLISHED OR IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS OPERATIONAL. OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDE WATER FOR CONTRACTOR.REPAIR, REPLACE, OR PROVIDE SOD/SEED AS REQUIRED FOR ANY ROADWAY BOULEVARD AREAS ADJACENT TO THESITE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION.REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER.RAIN GARDEN NOTE: PROVIDE AND INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BLANKET AT RAIN GARDEN AREA SIDE SLOPES(STRAW 1S, WOOD FIBER 1S), OR APPROVED EQUAL. BLANKET TO BE OVERLAPPED BY 4" AND ANCHORED BY SODSTAPLES. PLACE BLANKET PERPENDICULAR TO THE SLOPE. TRENCH IN EDGES OF BLANKET AREA TO PREVENTUNDER MINING. PROVIDE SILT FENCE AT TOP OF SLOPE AS NEEDED. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO MATCHBLANKET AREA (NO FILTER FABRIC). SEE RAIN GARDEN DETAIL FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. RAIN GARDEN TOPROVIDE PROPER INFILTRATION AND DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS PER ENGINEERS APPROVAL. 4. 1.2.3.5.6.7.8. 9.10.11.12.13.14.15.16.17.18.19.20.21.22.23.24. PLANTING NOTES COTTAGE GROVE, MN MISSISSIPPI LANDING . LICENSE NO. N.T.S.N.T.S.N.T.S. MINNESOTA LA28LA29 10/19/1810/19/1810/23/18 12/29/21 LA27-C LAST REVISED:LAST REVISED:LAST REVISED: .DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF WOOD OR PAINTED STEEL DELINEATORAROUND AND OUTSIDE ROOT BALL. TOP STAKES 5' ABOVE GROUND (MAX.)OR TO FIRST BRANCH. BOTTOM OFSTAKE 3' (MIN.) BELOW GROUND.STAKING POSTS TO BE 2"X2" STAINEDPOSTS. PLACE 3 POSTS EQUIDISTANTSECURE TREE TO POSTS WITH 16" LONGPOLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE, 40MIL., 1.5" WIDE STRAP. TOP STAKES 5' ABOVE GROUND (MAX.)WOOD OR PAINTED STEEL DELINEATORAROUND AND OUTSIDE ROOT BALL. OR TO FIRST BRANCH. BOTTOM OFSTAKE 3' (MIN.) BELOW GROUND.STAKING POSTS TO BE 2"X2" STAINEDPOSTS. PLACE 3 POSTS EQUIDISTANTSECURE TREE TO POSTS WITH 16" LONGPOLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE, 40MIL., 1.5" WIDE STRAP. TREES NATURAL GROUNDLINE WITH GUYING AND STAKING, AS REQUIRED, FORONE (1) YEAR ON ALL DECIDUOUS ANDCONIFEROUS TREES:PLACE MULCH, DEPTH AS SPECIFIED, OVERPLANT PITS - DO NOT PILE AGAINST TRUNK.FORM 3" DEEP WATERING BASIN.BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIEDBACKFILL SOIL.REFER TO AMERICAN STANDARD FORNURSERY STOCK FOR MINIMUM BALL SIZE.ROOT FLARE TO BE PLANTED AT OR NEARFINISHED GROUNDLINE.SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE.SET ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOILOR COMPACTED SOIL MOUND MATCHINGFINISHED SITE GRADE. PRUNE OUT MISDIRECTED BRANCHES.PROVIDE ONE CENTRAL LEADER. REMOVE CONTAINER, SCARIFY SIDES, ANDSET SOIL MASS ON COMPACTED SOIL BASEMOUND, MATCHING SHRUBS NATURALGROUNDLINE WITH FINISHED GRADEAS INDICATED)ADJACENT TO LAWN AREASSCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE.DEPTH PER CONTAINER SOIL DEPTHBACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIEDPLANTING SOIL OR AS APPROVEDSET CONTAINER ROOT SOIL ONUNDISTURBED SUBSOIL OR MILDCOMPACTED SOIL FOR DEPTH TO MATCHFINISH GRADE MULCH AS SPECIFIED (AND FILTER FABRIC,EDGING AT PLANTING BEDS, AS SPECIFIED, TREE WRAP MATERIAL FROM GROUNDLINETREES NATURAL GROUNDLINE WITH FINISHED GUYING AND STAKING, AS REQUIRED, FORONE (1) YEAR ON ALL DECIDUOUS ANDCONIFEROUS TREES:UPWARD TO FIRST BRANCHES, AS REQUIRED.PLACE MULCH, DEPTH AS SPECIFIED, OVERPLANT PITS - DO NOT PILE AGAINST TRUNK.FORM 3" DEEP WATERING BASIN.BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED BACKFILLSOIL.REFER TO AMERICAN STANDARD FORNURSERY STOCK FOR MINIMUM BALL SIZE.ROOT FLARE TO BE PLANTED AT OR NEARFINISHED GROUNDLINE.SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE.SET ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOILOR COMPACTED SOIL MOUND MATCHINGSITE GRADE. PRUNE OUT MISDIRECTED BRANCHES.PROVIDE ONE CENTRAL LEADER. 2XPLANTING2XBALLPLANTING BALL DIAMETER DIAMETER EVERGREEN TREE DECIDUOUS TREE SHRUB & PERENNIAL CONTAINER PLANTING EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 2X CONT. DIAMETER 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 PREPARED FOR: ..... 12/29/21 ..... INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: ... ## OR ### ########## DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-PPL01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 750' 66 OF 500' 12/29/21 250' Common Ground Alliance 48 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com 1" = DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 250' 0' 0030343.00 35% PROJECT NUMBER: OVERALL TREE PRESERVATION PLAN EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAINEXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE REMOVEDEXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE TO REMAINEXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE TO BE REMOVED LEGEND 05/28/15 TP08 LAST REVISED: THE TOTAL TREE HEIGHT. NEWLY DEAD BRANCHES THAT MAKE UP LESS THAN 13 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 ORANGE MESH CONSTRUCTION FENCE6' METAL FENCE POST. STAKE EVERY 6'" T " POST OR EQUALORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCESTAKED EVERY 6' DRIPLINELOCATION AS SHOWN ON PLAN. MAINTAINMAXIMUM DISTANCE FROM TRUNK POSSIBLE.MAXIMUM. 6' MAX. (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 IRONWOOD, OAK, ELM, MAPLE, WALNUT, ASH, HICKORY, BIRCH, BLACK CHERRY, HACKBERRY, AND LOCUST. : COTTONWOOD, CATALPA, POPLARS, ASPEN, SILVER MAPLE, BASSWOOD, BOX ELDER, AND WILLOW. TREE PROTECTION PhoneFax : A WOOD PLANT WHICH, AT MATURITY, IS A LEAST TWELVE (12) FEET OF MORE IN HEIGHT, AND WHICH RETAINS ITS A HEALTHY TREE MEASURING A MINIMUM OF SIX INCHES (6") DBH FOR HARDWOOD DECIDUOUS TREES, OR A MINIMUM A LIVE TOP CROWN THAT IS GREATER THAN QUALIFYING TREE INCHES REMOVED BEYOND THE PERMITTED THRESHOLDS SHALL BE REPLACED AT A RATE OF 50%, OR ONE (1) CONIFEROUS TREES OR HARDWOOD DECIDUOUS TREES SHALL BE USED AS REPLACEMENT TREES. ONE NEW CONIFER SIX (6) FEET IN DECIDUOUS TREES: NO LESS THAN 2.5 CALIPER INCHES. CONIFEROUS TREES: NO LESS THAN SIX FEET IN HEIGHT. (313 UNITS / 165 ACRE = 1.9 UN./AC.) QUALIFYING TREE:OF EIGHT INCHES (8") DBH FOR SOFTWOOD DECIDUOUS TREES OR A MINIMUM OF TEN FEET (10') IN HEIGHT FOR CONIFEROUS/EVERGREENTREES.SOFTWOOD DECIDUOUS SPECIESCONIFEROUS SPECIESGREEN COLOR YEAR ROUND AND DOES NOT DROP ITS FRONDS OR NEEDLES IN THE WINTER. DBH CONVERSION RATE: A NUMBER EQUAL TOONE HALF THE TREES'S HEIGHT IN FEET. 1"=2'THAT IS DENSE THROUGHOUT THE LIVE PORTION OF THE CROWN.QUANTITY:SIZE:SPECIES:TREES ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE FOR USE AS REPLACEMENT TREES. WHERE (10) OR MORE REPLACEMENT TREES ARE REQUIRED, NOT MORE THANTHIRTY THREE PERCENT (33%) OF THE REPLACEMENT TREES SHALL BE OF THE SAME SPECIES OF TREE. INDIGENOUS TREE SPECIES ARETHE PLANTING OF TREES FOR REPLACEMENT PURPOSES SHALL BE IN ADDITION TO ANY OTHER CITY LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS. HARDWOOD DECIDUOUS SPECIES:HEALTHY TREE: FIFTEEN PERCENT (15%) OF THE TOTAL CROWN. LESS THAN FIFTEEN PERCENT (15%) OF THE TREE CROWN WITH MISSING BRANCHES. FOLIAGERESIDENTIAL: <10 UNITS / ACREREPLACEMENT CALIPER INCH FOR TWO (2) REMOVED DIAMETER INCHES.HEIGHT SHALL BE CREDITED AS CONTRIBUTING TWO (2) CALPIER INCHED TO THE TOTAL OF REQUIRED REPLACEMENT INCHES. ORNAMENTALENCOURAGED. BETWEEN THE TWO SITES.MISSISSIPPI DUNES: 223 TREES REQUIREDLIFESTYLE COMMUNITIES: 104 TREES REQUIRED WITHIN THE FENCE-LINE WITHOUT APPROVAL IN WRITING FROM THE CITY.SITE GRADING TO BE DONE ONLY AFTER PROTECTIVE MEASURES HAVE BEEN TAKEN, CITY HAS APPROVED NO STORAGE OF MATERIALS, OPERATION OF MACHINERY, OR DEVELOPMENT OF ANY SORT WILL OCCURFENCING LOCATIONS, AND ALL CONTRACTORS HAVE BEEN BRIEFED ON TREE PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES. ---------- QUALIFYING TREESIZES AND TYPES OF REPLACEMENT TREES PERMITTED TREE REMOVAL -- 1. PRUNING WILL BE DONE BY PROFESSIONALS DURING APPROPRIATE PRUNING SEASON.2.3. ELEVATIONPLANNOTES: NOTE: TREE REPLACEMENT HAS BEEN BROKEN DOWN FURTHER TREE PROTECTION DETAIL TREE PRESERVATION REQUIREMENTSTREE PRESERVATION CALCULATIONS COTTAGE GROVE, MN MISSISSIPPI LANDING . M F LICENSE NO. | | | H | O P | MINNESOTA | | | | | H O P | 12/29/21 | | M F| | | H .DATE: OI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF | P | | | | | H | O P | | | FM | | H O P | | | | | | H O P M F H O P H O P M FH O P H O P M F EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 H O P 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 H MO P F PREPARED FOR: M F M F M F F P T F F P T P T F P T F PF P T T F TP F PM F T F P F T P T F P T H PO F H P OT P F P T F P T FPT F F PTP T H ..... O F PP T 12/29/21 F P T F P T ..... F PH T XO P INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: H O P ... 25' 250' OR 50' DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-TPP01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 150' 66 OF 100' 12/29/21 50' Common Ground Alliance 49 Call 48 Hours before digging: 1" = 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 50' 0' 0030343.00 60726073 H O P F 6065P T 60716074 6067 606660686069 H O P 60646063 PROJECT NUMBER: PLAN H O P 6062 H O P 60506051 TREE PRESERVATION 6052 6053 6054 6057 60596061 605660556060 60366038603960406058 1 6049 60416042 16 60376043 6035 6047 6048 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 6223 6033 60326034 M F(952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 6222 62216220 60316030 60456046 6009 PhoneFax 60086007 M F6044 4 M 60056006 F 5 6010 6219 TREE 60126011 3 M 2 F 6018 6004 6003 FENCE (TYP.) PROTECTION 6017 6002 6015601360146016 M F 2 6001 6020 COTTAGE GROVE, MN 621662176215 M 39 6021 F 6019 MISSISSIPPI LANDING 60226023 1 6024 6029 M F 602660276025 62186214 4554 4549 60284553 62126213 4550 M F 620162036205 45596202 . 454845524547 4551 45464545 620662046207 OUTLOT B OUTLOT A F P T M F 6211 6186455645574555 4558 6189 61916198 45316190 F 453461886187 P T LICENSE NO. 45324533M 6210 F 619561966200 F 453645384541 45394537 P T 6199 61946197 MINNESOTA 4530 4565 45684566 1 12/29/21 4564 M 23 F 6209 61936208 45294561 4563 6192 F 4 4535454445694571 P T4560 .DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF 4572 M F TREE PROTECTIONFENCE (TYP.) 45944595 4597 454345424567454045624598 4574 4570F P TF F 457745734580P4599 P T T M 1 45164518F F PF T P T 458445824575 452645254523 4515 45884576 4578 F 45964520 P T F PT 45274528M 14 FF P 5020 502150195022 T 45874589 F 458150235025 45834579 P F 441044114409 TP T M F 45914590 442544264424 44234422 451345174519 4408 4592459344294427 44404439 F5018 44034407 P 458545864512 T 441444134412 4441 F 444344424390439143864385 P 4511T 4514452145244522440244044405 45094384 5013 4446444744454444 F P44284431 T M F 44724471 F 4473 P 4401 T 4415 50175016 5014 F P T 4433443044194417 F 450545104508 P 439243874393 T 4438 44214399440043954398 4420 50125015 M F FP 450445024503 T44364437 44324435 45064507 44064394 F 43884389 P 5009500150075008 T EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 44994495F 44484449P T50105011 5006 44634462 45004501 44614464 4475 44744476 F P T 446544684467 F 44514454445344504452 P T 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 F P4396 4397 T4466443444184416 446044584459 F 448144804477 P T 44564455 F 1 P T 4497 44784479 4494 F F FPP5004500350055002 P T T T 15 44694470 4498 4496 F448444854482 P T F P T4457 F P T PREPARED FOR: 4493 4492 44904491 4489 44864487 44834488 ..... 12/29/21 ..... INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: ... 5' OR 10' 50.000001' DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-TPP01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 150' 66 OF 100' 12/29/21 50' Common Ground Alliance 50 Call 48 Hours before digging: 1" = 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 50' 0' 0030343.00 PROJECT NUMBER: PLAN TREE PRESERVATION H O P H O P H O P H O P S AG 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 H O P H O P (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 H O P H PhoneFax O P H O P H O P H O P 61136114 H O P 6099 F P T H O P 6103 61026104 6101 6105 H O P60986100 6097 6115 COTTAGE GROVE, MN TREE H O P 6106 FENCE (TYP.) MISSISSIPPI LANDING PROTECTION 6096 H O P 6110 6111 H6109 O P 61086107 . H O P 6091 6090 6087 6084 6112 6092609360946095 6085 60756086 H O 60886089 P F P T LICENSE NO. 6081 6082 MINNESOTA H O P 6083 60796078 6070 12/29/21 608060776076 60726073 H O .DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF P F 6065P T 60716074 6067 606660686069 H O P 60646063 H O P 6062 H O P 60506051 6052 6053 6054 6057 60596061 6060 60566055 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 60366038603960406058 1 6049 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 60416042 16 60376043 6035 PREPARED FOR: 60486047 6223 6033 6034 6032 M F 6222 62216220 60316030 60456046 6009 60086007 M F6044 4 M 60056006 F 5 6010 6219 TREE 60126011 3 M 2 F ..... 12/29/21 6018 6004 6003 FENCE (TYP.) PROTECTION 6017 6002 60136014 60156016..... M F 2 INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: 6001 6020 ... 621662176215 M 39 6021 F 5' 6019 OR 10' 50.000001' 60226023 1 6024 6029 M F 602660276025 62186214 4554 4549 60284553 62126213 4550 M F 620162036205 45596202 454845524547 DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: 4551 OUTLOT B N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-TPP01.DWG OUTLOT A MISSISSIPPI LANDING 150' 66 OF 100' 12/29/21 50' Common Ground Alliance 51 Call 48 Hours before digging: 1" = 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 50' 0' 0030343.00 4251 4250 5412 5413 4016 427742734275 40124013 40224023 14 4260 42614262 26 4264 2 4015 4018 13 54115410 27 4263 5397 53815417 5379 542054195418 5396 5395 12 PROJECT NUMBER: 53805394 28 5406 PLAN 54045405 5414 5433 11 5393 540754085409 10 5 5421 9 54165415 5422 5430 6 5378 29 54315432 5429 8 7 54275428 53775376 5391 53905389 543854375440 5259 53755374 52605434 5425 5426 TREE PRESERVATION 5262 5261 30 5 5382 5383 5392 5264 5266 54235424 5439 31 54355436 4 5270 5276 5373 52775278 2 5268 32 5272527352745267 5385 5384 53875388 525852655263 52845283 5285 5386 5269 33 53715372 5300 5304 52935292 34 5289 52915290 5303 53015302 5271 5275 3 39 5370 35 528852865282 5287 3837 36 5281 52795280 5308 53095307 53165310 530552985296 5299 5318 5317 132 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 5313 53315330 529752945295 5167 53275322532153065164 5328 53325333 5334 52545255 5338 53395341 5342 (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 5311 532053125314 5319 5315 14 53435336 5344 5256 5335532953255324 5326 F P T 5158 535253515153 516851625170 12 PhoneFax 5353 5346534753375340 51605257 51635172 51615169 5179 51665188 51655189 51575156 53235159 F 51805184 P 11 T 5181 15 F P 51915220 53595356T 518351855253 52505252 536553665367 53455348 53615360 10 5173 51945193 5150514151515155 5187 535853575171 535551865182 5354 51425143514451455152 F P5251 T 534953505103 51905192FP T 5248 F 7 TP F 9 P T52495247 51545175 F TPF P T 5197 F 6 P 45 51745196T 536953685195 8 52175215521652245223 16 536353645362 5176 51495177 1 52215229 F 5241 52015198521952145218 5204 P 51015109 5105 T F 50785065P T 513251335135 522852225230 51075102 5202519952005203 F5245524052425239 TP 5063 5064 513651395140 5098510451065100 5099F 5090TP 50685069506750795066 51485178 548754885490 PF FT PF 5108 T503250335039504350405041P T 51475146 5042511151105097 50305029 1 F PF T5077 F PP T 50615060 T 5080 5038503552375236 509175135233 FTPF P T50885089 PF T5112 507250825081 50765071 5238 17 502150195022 51275129 524652445243 5231 52265232 52055206 5093 5125 5131 5126513451375138 5062 TREE 751275117514 51235122 502350255024 52075213521052255227 521252115485 52095208 50505058 52345235 F 5044 5045 50835087508651285130P 505950495057T 5092 5096 5486 5031 502750265028 FENCE (TYP.) PROTECTION COTTAGE GROVE, MN 50945095512451165121 7515 50345054 5053 7517 50705075 5036503750735074 50555056 50855084 5052 5051 F 18 P 7518 T MISSISSIPPI LANDING 50485117 51205118 50477519 504675207516 5115 5113 51195114 F P T 70417040 7042 7043 70377036 70397038 19 70357034 F. 7050 70447047P 7049 70487032 T 7045 7046 7028 7058 20 7052 7075 F7033 P 7057 7051 T LICENSE NO. 70177016 7073 7031 7030 7021 70267022 70297077 70257027 7024 70237078 7018 70897090 MINNESOTA 70917092 F 7062 P T 21 705370207019 706470567063705570547074 7138 7076 7072 70797080 12/29/21 70887087 7060 7061 70827083708670857084 7067 70597065 .DATE: 716471587081I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF 7167 F7168 P 7070 7071 7066T 70987096 7068 717471717170 7069 71757178 70977099 71547160 71507147 7155 710371027095 7152 7151 22 71777176 7153 71497148 F 71807190 P T 7146 71457100 7173 71927172 7214 7211 71437144 72107213 7165 71697166 7212 719171017105 718971797156 714271417140 71577201720772227208 7159716371627161 F P 7221 71957199 T 23 7181 7193 718371827194 72057209 72237220 7215 718571887187 1 7217 TPF7216 7200720372027206 72787139 7418741974207427 719871967197 7108 72047416 73967184 7393 7186 7282 72817283 721872197423 7224 24 7368 7366 7367 7394 73917277 7392741772807279 736973737395 7276 F P 7425 T 7422 74267424 7429 7428 7287 7421 7411 73727371 7415 7414 73897390 7387 736373647362 739974337432 74137412 F 7365 7375739774107431 P EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 T 728872857284 73887386 25 72867430 7409 3 73987400 74347435 73807379 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 7355 7356 737673787374 73617370 7383 F7334 7359736073777384 74087385 P 73317407 T 7381 7436 7333 7335 F P 7382 T 7291 72907289 74067437 73307315 734873457346 735473507349 2 74897490 74057404 7314 7353 7332 F7329 P T 7352 F PREPARED FOR: P 734774877486 T S 7358 73577351A G X 7343 7336 7401 74387292 7342734473277317 72957294 748074817482 7326 F P 7337 T F 73417338 S7322 73407324 P A GT X 1 F P T74027403 731673137312 F 733973257323 P T F 7477747974837485 P T 7293747474767484 73287318 F 7488 P 7306X 7319 T F P T 729872977296 F P 7311 7308730773097310 T 7459 7471 7472 X OUTLOT I 74607458 732073217304747074737469 74757478 730072997457 743974547456 73037305 7302 X TREE 7301 7440 X 74647462 74617441 7467 7465 7455 7463745174497468 FENCE (TYP.) PROTECTION 745374467452 745074667448 ..... 744274447445 12/29/21 74437447 ..... INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: ... 5' OR 10' 50.000001' DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-TPP01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 150' 66 OF 100' 12/29/21 50' Common Ground Alliance 52 Call 48 Hours before digging: 1" = 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 50' 0' 0030343.00 H O P | | | | H| O P | | | | | | H O | P | | | | | H O | P | | PROJECT NUMBER: | PLAN | | H | O P | | | | | | H O P | | | | | | H O |TREE PRESERVATION P | | | | 6123 | H | O P | | | | | | H O P| | | | | | H O | P | | | | | H O| P | | | | | H O| P | H O P 6122 OUTLOT C H 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 O P H O P H (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 O P H O P PhoneFax H O P H O P H TREE PROTECTIONFENCE (TYP.) O P 6121 1 2 H O P 5 F TP 20 H O P 8 3 19 7 COTTAGE GROVE, MN 6 MISSISSIPPI LANDING 4 5 18 4 OUTLOT C . 17 16 LICENSE NO. MINNESOTA 6247 15 23 12/29/21 14 .DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF 24 6115 6248 F 13 P 61166117 T 6245 6246 12 611861196120 4 4171 4172 11 12 10 11 9 624162396240 6242 10 415641824180 41544155 4187418341854184 41774178 4176 6235 41604161 6232 8 62346233 41574158 9 417541734174 62446243 13 6238 6237 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 7 4138414341404142 4181 4188 4137413641394163 8 4159 40946236 41654162 41414153 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 41704179 6231 4086 3 41174119 4164416841694186 4145 41164118414441664167 408940884087 14 7 40914090 4152 4120 4135 4134 4133 4101 6 4083 40924093 4099 4084 15 408541064113 41024097 6230 4151 41504130 6 4129 410541284122 4096 4115 4121 PREPARED FOR: 4149 5 411441004112414641484147 62266228 4110 16 4098 413241314126 5 4123 4127 4104 4095 4 40454046 40804081 4082 40484047 41254124 4079 4078 17 410341074108 62246225 21 8916 62276229 41118915 4109 8926 40564054 89188917 89248923 40444043 89258975 18 4 40414042 892789288978 20 405940584057 898289818929 40374038 3 405540534052 8931 89328930 40604076 40394040 40514050 4049 19 89748973897289718970 407740754073 19 4 8934 893589768977 3 40364035 8969 4062 4061 8936 893789848979 8998 89838980 3 8994 40744002 40694003 20 8959 89958993 4034406440018999 8933 18 2 89688967 40684067 4063 4008 4004 8992 8996 2 8963 8990 42848997 4285 4071 4070 17 40724065 ..... 42898991 2 8939 8938 12/29/21 4269 4032 4066 898889898985 89878986 426742664268 1 40334026 4271 403140274030 16 4252 42544253 42794278 42704272 400740064005 24..... 40104009 4280 4028 540254014029 42884258 42874259 1 42574255 INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: 42764274 42834286 4281 4021 401940204282 15 4265 25 40114014 5403 4256 5400 4017 40244025 53995398... 4251 4250 5' 5412 40165413 427742734275 40124013 40224023 14 4260 42614262 OR 26 10' 50.000001' 4264 2 4015 4018 13 54115410 27 4263 5397 53815417 5379 542054195418 5396 5395 12 53805394 28 5406 54045405 5414 5433 11 DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: 5393 N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-TPP01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 150' 66 OF 100' 12/29/21 50' Common Ground Alliance 53 Call 48 Hours before digging: 1" = 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 50' 0' 0030343.00 10 9 8731872987308723 873287338728 26 1 9 8 5535 PROJECT NUMBER: PLAN 5536 27 8038 80378034 804280398040 8 80658066 5531 5532 7 8064 8055803380548063 805380468044 808080788079 TREE PRESERVATION 553355348031 5537 80328068 8056 8057805880698077 80138014 80678070 28 803680358041 8043 80128011 801580208060818281798180 80598184 805280508045F P 80098010 550381918192819481868176 55028075 550455055507T8062807380848076 5506 7 8071 803080298190 548754885490 5492549154995501550080078008 8047 8048F PT 8049 6 FP T 30 PF T 29 55225523 80058006 8021 80198022 550981858183 8072 82588178806181778175 80518259817482618260 802380248026 5526 550855118189 8004 5510 9 8016 54895497549880178018 552755245525 8025802780288187 6 818182568254 8255 11 826382648081 8188 819382578195 819881998196819783048302 5 54955496 5520 54945493 55215518 31 5519 8251 82908253 8252825082958294829382928291 551755165515551255135514 5528 5539 820382018200 2 3 4 8225822882318223 1 83078306 8246 8301 8262826582668270 822482478249 8230822782268296 8248 8287 55295530 8297 5 8303 8204820280038305 4 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 3 554655405545 5541 5544820682108244 5538 561356115612 82778275 799982078002820882058243 7988 554255438288 2 8283 56155614 7998 8289 55525551 82988308 799782998279 79968001 1 8220 821279858221 (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 8286 5550 55495556 82828284828582818280 555555545553 7990 5548554782788300 8242 8209 8211799482148219 8241 823382328222 56535651 5650561856175616 7722 821779818215822982188237 7001 7008 82358236 56545652 82458239 8276 79487947 7598 PhoneFax 759979957596 7009 55595561 5563HOP 79877725 79827983 POH7951 70157014POH OH P7963 POH79607956 786579537958 POH79547952 821682388240 8213 561975947723 5660565556647986 701370127011H7991 O79897992 P 7993 7721 5688 5665 56667597 7600 70067007H7595 7005 O 7610P7603 7602 7592 5623 5566 555855655560 700470035564 701770167977 7972 7980 8234 797179707968 562156225557 56615620 566356625659565756565658F P 5562 70187950 7946 77277726T 7969 5625797578017967 H7591 7962 78587860 70917092796579617959795579577857 7964 O 566956725674 75937724771377298363 7010P771477187720 713475897588797979737859 568656877984 7949 5671 21 7607 7128712756245693 70025673566756687615 569056895692 56845683 10 76067590 7604 713871377093 7587 55705569 7806 7966 77287974 9 77167804 7133 7135 56767864 5675 55677944793579377945 55687601761175757609 569656917863 7862 771977117712 569856857612 F 7941 7803780278617805 5670P 78097807 7136T 7586 7854 7976797877997748 H 75837584771577087730 7709 5678567777987750 O 11 76087614 7605 56975694569577177585 5571 P78527851 7732 7582 7613 70987096 7126 15 7940 7131564971297936 71207121 1416 13 70977099 7104711277067707 7130 780078567818 780877937855 7118711977537754 7103710270957094 5682 12 7853 569975747577 775677557747 7573 7849 7933 57225626 7811 56485680F P79387850 T 71327125 F 7710 F7931 P7939 TP F78487934 PT T 57005681 71247123 H 71177819 O 5708567957077703 57217822 5703 7817 562756285629P77967788 7146 7100 71117110F779577947791 77637758 P766477527797774477577662 T7746 770277017749 5573 557275717705 7579 7618 56475646 7734 778678107792 7846 769977437751 71017105 F 57055713 7140F 71427141P7745 P77317789 5711781278477929 56305631T 8 T 57205719776077837784 F 75787576P 75687572758177047616T 7663 57095701570257107845TPF 5704 7580 781678147815 FPT 76727759 F76737761FPT P T FFP PT TPFTF 7567P 762275607623T 71167122H7558 7620769176197617 75697570 7697776277907785 7787781377757821 7733 O7820 766578417839 P76717823 711571097695 7696 7670 7825 5645777977737774 55775632777778277830 756275577561 75557556 COTTAGE GROVE, MN 7698770078447776 557477707780 557655757842 7661 564056357738 7740 4 5718F 711357125717 7114 773976807737 P 7735 570657145715T7837 7828784378367838 756675517552 727871397778 10 710871067107563456365633 765977827781 765676557658 76607657 7629 MISSISSIPPI LANDING 7282 72817283H7625 5731 5644 76217692 56415716O7563762675597624 7 P 7675773676697667767476687666 57235638 769478347835 7693 56435642 76767677 F777178317833 782478267832 P T 776477657769 7654 55795580 77687766 76537767 75537829 557875447772 7554774276827681 7628 57265724 76837679 7684 56395581 76897631 6 769076527648 767876507649 5735573457337565 5 5732768676887741 57305736572957275728 756476277630 754775507546 F H P T O P 57255584 TREE PROTECTIONFENCE (TYP.) 754575497548 72887285728457515752 5750 7505 563755827541 75437542 F P5747576057465754 T763476357685763676377638 76877640763976427641764376457644 7632 . 764776517646 3 7633 10 5759 5744574957455748 57385737 H 5583 5585 O P H 74927493 O 5755 57565753 P F P T F558675367535 P T X 7227575872265757 753975387540 7537 H LICENSE NO. 5743 57405739 O 5742 7489749075347533 P F P749774957496750275037504 74877486 T MINNESOTA H 7225 7240 O7230 X7231 P72285741 748074817482 72297242 F P 12/29/21 H T7241 O 7498 74917499752875267532 72397238P 7527 X .DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF H752975307531 F P7501 7500O T P 7477747974837485 H O 72337232 7488 P X 723772347235752375257524 72365587 H O P H 5592 55935591O P 74757478 75097521 7522 5589 559055887510 TREE 7273 HH OO 7467P P 72687269 FENCE (TYP.) PROTECTION 750675077508 X 559655955594 727072757274 5597 H7267 7265 O 726672717272 P 72627260 5598 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 H O 7261 P72637264 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 H 72587259 H T O P O L T U 56025600 56055604 O H5601 5599 O 725572567257 56085607P PREPARED FOR: 5603 H O P 560672527250 72547253 5610 560972477248 72497251 72447246 7243 7245 ..... 12/29/21 ..... INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: ... 5' OR 10' 50.000001' DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-TPP01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 150' 66 OF 100' 12/29/21 50' Common Ground Alliance Call 48 Hours before digging:54 1" = 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 50' 0' 0030343.00 42224223 32 42254224 417741784176 3 12 4214 421642084215 42214220 42294228 4210 4175 41734174 33 6 4211 42124213 4209 4219 42174218 88408839 4179 34 4205 42074206 PROJECT NUMBER: 2 PLAN 4381 5 7 883888418837 OUTLOT F 4204 883688344203 35 4 4382 8844886088438842 8857 8832 88638835 8858 88318829 88308828 3 TREE PRESERVATION 4383 88338864 88468859 1 8861 88498854 89028906 882788248826 8862 88458847 4380 885088558856 43764377 43794378 8898890089038905 2 8913 8899 8914 8919892088688867 8853 8848 89168885 21 890788658866 8915 89188917 8821882088178818 892489238819 8891 890188518852 890488908889 8872 88708869 8975 1 882588238822 889688828880888388778871 8884 8960 8957 8881 8921 895689558912 89588922 8812 4375 18 889588948897 89458892 89088875 8910888888768874 887888798873 88938911 89738972897189708816881488138815 8974 89428941 8965 17 888689098887 89548953 8969 8959 22 89688967 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 8943 8949895089478946 17 43744372 4373 89448940 8961 89628948 8966 18 899089638964 8952 16 23 2 88088809881042918811 19 (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 8985 8987898689888989 429042924294 4295 42354293 895142454234 4246 425442534252 42424247 16 24 PhoneFax 4249 4248 20 8807 4296429942984316 42974317 43184319 15 431543134314 43224323 4300 423742304232 4320 430343024301 4251 4250 431243064307 4231 4241423942364233 423842404244 4243 15 43084311 430943104321 7 43264327 43244325 4305 21 4304 9 88048803 8772 14 87758774 877387718770 879987984331 8800 43284330 87798776 87788777 433243294335 8801 8802 87608759 878887878786434143394342 8783 87818761 87858784 880588068780 54588782 54595457 14 11 875687578758 876387648762 5452 54568765 87678766 4348 4349 5484 434343444346 879487954337 8 433343344336 8791 43454347 8768 13 8769 8790 22 8789 8754 43384340 6 5441 54425443 87938792 54485449 54445447 87968797 874887474350 54385437544043524351 545154535454 5467875587538752 548254815468 545054555480 5466 COTTAGE GROVE, MN 5460 5469 13 54745475 8746 5 5445 12 5483 5439F 54468745 8751 874987504353P MISSISSIPPI LANDING 4357 T 9 23 54355436 43544356 43554358 5476547354725477 8743 12 43594360 54715461 547054635465 5479547854645462 11 8744 87428741 TREE 8 10 24 . FENCE (TYP.) PROTECTION 11 87378725 8734 87278736 10 25 2 87388739 8740 LICENSE NO. 11 872687358724 10 MINNESOTA 9 8731872987308723 12/29/21 873287338728 26 1 .DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF 9 5535 8 5536 27 8038 80378034 80398040 8042 8 8066 8065 5531 5532 7 80558033805480638064 805380468044 80788079 8080 553355348031 5537 8068 8032 8056805880698077 8057 80138014 8070 8067 28 8043803680358041 80128011 802080608180 8015818481828179 80508059F 80528045 8009P 801081928194 55025503819181868176 8062808480768075 5504550555075506T8073 7 8071 8190 54875488549080308029 549254918007 5499550155008008 8047 8048FP T 8049 6 F PT F 30 TP 29 55225523 80058006 8021 80198022 55098185 8183 8072 8258 805181788061817781758259817482618260 80238026 8024 5526 550855118189 8004 5510 9 8016 8018 5489549754988017 5527 55245525 8025 802780288187 6 8181825682548255 11 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 826382648081 8188819382578195 81968197 8198819983048302 5 549554965520 54945493 551955215518 31 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 8251 82908253 8252825082958294829382928291 5517 551655155512551355145528 5539 820382018200 32 4 8223 822582288231 1 83078306 8246 830182628265 82668270 822482478249 82308227822682488296 8287 55295530 8297 5 83058303 820482028003 4 3 554655405545 5541 820682108244 5544 5538 561356115612 82778275 7999820779888002820882058243 554255438288 2 8283 PREPARED FOR: 56155614 7998 8289 55525551 7997829883088279 8299 8001 7996 1 8220 821279858221 8286 555055495556 8285 8282828482818280 555555545553 5548554779908278 82428300 8209 8211799482148219 8241 8222 82338232 5651 5653 5650561856175616 7722 8229 82177981821582188237 70087001 82358236 56545652 82458239 794879478276 7598759979957596 7009 555955635561HOP 7987 7725 798279837951 POH 70157014POH POH 796079567963 POH7865 7953795879547952 POH 8213821682388240 7594 5660565556197723 5664H79917986 70137012701179897992 O P 79937721 5688 566656657597 7600 7006 70057007H7595 O 7610P7603 7602 7592 5623 555855665565 5560 7003 70045564 701770167977 79807972 82347971 79707968 56225557 56205621 5661566356625659565756565658F 5562P 701879467950 77277726T 780179677969 5625H7975 75917962 7860 709170927858 7965796179647959795579577857 O 5669567256747729 77187593772477138363 71347010P75897588771477207973 797979847859 56865687 7949 5671 21 7607 7128712756245693 70027615 567356675668569056895692 5684 5683 10 7606 76047590 7138 71377093 7587 55705569 7806 7966 77287974 9 7716 7804 71337135 7864 56755676 5567556876017611757576097944793579377945 569656917863 7862 771977117712 5698 56857612 F 7941 7803780278617805 56707807P 7809 7136T 7586 7854 7976797877997748 H 7715 75837584770977087730 56785677O77987750 11 760576087614 56975694569577177585 55717852 P7851 7732 76137582 70987096 15 7131712671297940 5649 1416 7936 71207121 13 7097 7099711277067707 71047130 7818 78007856 77937855 7808 7754 7094711871197753 710371027095 12 5699568275777853 75747747 757377567755 7849 7933 5722 5626 7811 56485680F TP79387850 71327125 F 7710 F79317939 P TP F78487934T P T 5681 5700 71247123 H 7819 7117 O 5708567957077703 570357217822 7817 P77967788 562756285629 ..... 7146 7100 77957794 71117110F7791 P77637664775277977744775877577662 T7746 7749 77027701 5572557375717705 12/29/21 76187579 56475646 7734 78107792 77867846 7751 76997743 71017105 F 57055713 714271417140F P77317745 P77897812 57115630563178477929 T 8 T 57205719776077837784 F 75687572757875767616P 75817704T 7663F 570957045701570257107845TP 758078167815 FP7814 T 7673767277617759 FTPF PT F FPT FPT TPF 7567 P 71227558762275607623T 7116H76197617 76207691 75697570 7697776277877813779077857821..... 77337775 7820 O 766578417839 76717823 71157109P 76957696 7670 7825 56455577563277797773777777747827 7830 75557556756275577561 78447776 769877007780 557555747770 55767842 7661 56405635 77407738 INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: 4 57185712F 711471135717 773976807737 P T7735 570657145715782878377838 75667551755278437836 7139 72787778 10 7107563456365633 71087106 7658765977827781 76567655 76607657 7629 7282 72817283H7625 57315644 5641O755976217692 5716756376267624 7 P 7675766776687666 773676697674 57235638 7835 769376947834 56435642... 7676 F7677 77717824783178267833 7832 5' P T 776477657769 7654 OR 55795580 7766 765377677768 755378297772 55787544 75547681 762877427682 57265724 768476837679 10' 56395581 6 76897631 769076527678764876507649 573557345733 5 7565 7741 50.000001' 573257365729572776867688 57305728 756476277630 7547 75507546 F H P T O P 57255584 TREE PROTECTIONFENCE (TYP.) 7285754575497548 72887284575157525750 7505 56375582 7541 75437542 F P 5747576057465754 7685 T768776347635763676377640763876457644 7639764276417643 7632 76477651 7646 3 7633 10 5759 5744574957455748 57385737 H 55855583 O P H 74927493 O 575557565753 P F P T DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-TPP01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 150' 66 OF 100' 12/29/21 50' Common Ground Alliance 55 Call 48 Hours before digging: 1" = 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 50' 0' 0030343.00 | 6250 | PROJECT NUMBER: |PLAN | H | O P | | | | | | H O P| | | |61846185 | | H O| P |TREE PRESERVATION | 6249 | | 618161826183 | H | O P | | | | 6170 617261736171 | | H O P| | | | | | H O| P | | | | |6151 61506152 H | O 61756169617661746180 P | | 61776178 61466148614961686179 | | | | H O P6167 6166 | | | | | | H O | P6156 6141 6147 | 6157 | | 6153 61556154 | | 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 H | O P | | | | | 61346135 6143 | H O P| | | 614261446145 61406139 | | |(952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 H | O P 6129 | | | 6133 | | H| O 6165 P |61326136 PhoneFax 6137 6138 | | | 615961616158 | 6128 | H O | P |6130 | | | | H | O P | | | 6160 | | | H O P| 61276131 | | | | | H | O P TREE 6162 PROTECTIONFENCE (TYP.)6163 | | | F | P 6125 |6126T H| O P | | | | | F P | T | | | | | | | | | 6164 COTTAGE GROVE, MN 6124 MISSISSIPPI LANDING 13 6123 1 19 20 2 18 3 17 4 . 5 16 15 LICENSE NO. 5 MINNESOTA OUTLOT C 14 65056507 12/29/21 65106509 .DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF 907390749072 9071 13 90799078 65046503 6502 1211 9077 22 9080 9070 12 21 20 13 19 90759076 11 14 10 90689067 23 90669065 9069 9 15 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 90959094 909790989099 10 90939096 8 9091 90909092 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 16 90899088 9100 24 7 9062906390649061 6 9083908590869087 9 17 9081 6 90829084 PREPARED FOR: 18 905990609058 25 8 7 90549053 9055 13 19 90569057 7 26 12 20 91029101 6 2111 27 22 5 10 23 28 41914190 4189 4 24..... 42014202 419441934195 12/29/21 4192 9 4196 4197 29 6 3 4200 41984199 ..... INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: 2 8 30 4171 4172 ... 5' 1 4226 4 OR 31 10' 7 50.000001' 4227 42224223 32 41824180 42254224 4187418341854184 417741784176 3 12 4161 4214 4216 42084215 42214220 42294228 4210 417541734174 33 13 6 DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: 42114212 4213 4181 4188 N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-TPP01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 150' 66 OF 100' 12/29/21 50' Common Ground Alliance 56 Call 48 Hours before digging: 1" = 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 50' 0' 0030343.00 925592669256 23 9258 9225 9224 9192 9170917191919194 9219919391969195 9218 92239222 9220 9231 92329234467446734672 9233 468346844685 F46774676 25 P T 4680 46814682 46784679 24 4651 4657 4669464846504649 4671 PROJECT NUMBER: 46754670 PLAN 465246534654 4656 4655 4658 464446474646 OUTLOT F 4667466846664664 4665 4643 4640 4645 46414642 4662 4663 9300 462846614627 4629 46334634 TREE PRESERVATION 46594660463946374638 4614 461546354636 46324631 4630 43764377 46124610 4611 4622 93029301 4616 461746134620 460946184619 46064624 4608 46264625 4623462146074603 460446054600 4371 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 4369 4601 4602 (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 4370 PhoneFax 8706 8705 8707 8701 87038702 8704 8700 436243634364 4365 COTTAGE GROVE, MN MISSISSIPPI LANDING 4366 8719 8720 8699 43554358 87148715 43594360 436143674368 87168713 8709 8712 87188717871187108708 . 87378725 8698 87278736 LICENSE NO. 872687358724 MINNESOTA OUTLOT G 872987308723 12/29/21 873287338728 .DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF 87228721 86978696 80788079 TREE 8080 PROTECTIONFENCE (TYP.) 86628661 869286878688 80698077 865886598660 86518653 86568663 810881138110 810481038105 86478548854686488695 86918693 86838681 8684 8685 8101810281128117811681158557 808480768075 807380748083 80868091 8089 80968095 8071 809880998100 80908094866486698694 F 80978145 854786508649 P F TP T 86528657 865486558539 F P 86658666 T F P869086898686 8543 86678668 T 808580938158 80888092 854985528551854285508537 86728671 8670 8107 81068556855885548555 85598676 8674 85298528 F 8111811481188119853286808679 81098535 P 80878165 8159 T 826781628160 8082 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 81298127 854485458540 8560 8263826480818161 81308131 8146814181428140 8553 8513 81568157F 8155P F85418517 T8673 P 8125 81358128812681338134 T 81448143 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 8147815381528139 8123 8124812084968121 84958122 8526 851285048524 8531 853086788682 8677 F P T8515 8511 8136813885278523 853885368534 85058508 86418525 1 817382698268817281638635 8615 85008498 84978499 F 83018262826586438642 82668270864086758645 FP T P 861386148616 8167816681718170 T852185338522 8509851485198518861185168612 830583038164816881698331 81518154814981488150 8326 813286448646 8272 8501 82718503 8329 82778275 F81378330 8325 P PREPARED FOR: T 86368637 86238624 8617 860986088610 8520 850285108506 832483278328 86398638 82738274 86348619 827886188620 8300 F 83228323 P 86258632 T 8561 8563 860686058633 86028630 8621 8622 85078564 86278631 794879478276 F 8315831883198321 P T 8332 83348333 832083148316 8313831786078604 8629 F P T 83118310 8309 86288626 83548355 83508352 8349 8580858685858587 860385948601 8341858485828589 8340857485818583 856283388339 F P T 833783368346 F 7943 7942 P 79467950 T 83578353 8356 859885958600 83638408841184128415 834784108409859785968599 7949 8360 838983518388842783488335 8358 8362 8374831283758379 8361 8359 83878385 8364 8578 7944793579377945834285938592 838383848386 85888577 F 7941 841684338421 P 8576 T8579 84268407 84248575 84178422841485738567 8423 840384068429 8569 8378 8376856685708568 8365 84398435 8443 84048391 7940 16 793684458451 84448440 83908392 83448565 834585908591 85718572 83738398 836783708372 78497932 7933 8369836679248371840584018425 8368 8430 79387850 F 7931793983778380 P 84348438 78487934T 8343 8381838283958399841384188419842084638436 79168396 8437 84428441 84028393 ..... 8394 8400 84318478 8428 12/29/21 8480 787683978464 84478446 784679158476 8450 8462 84498461 784779297928 843284558448 8482 79307925 79268452 F84938494 P T F 7845TP 791779187923 78787887 847578838487848979068492 7873788078798479 84888486 79197877 8485..... 8457 784178397921 7840 84568453 8467 84598474 790584688454 847184658460 8466 8481 8477 78428490 7881 8491790878957907 INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: 78757874 78377838 78437836 7927 7866 786779227920 8458 7891 78867885 7911 7912848484837910 79137914 79098473 84698472 7835 7834 78827888 78717884... 7870 786878697872 5' OR 7904 7893 78927894 10' 50.000001' 79037899 84707898 78897890 7901 7902 7900 7897 7896 DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-TPP01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 150' 66 OF 100' 12/29/21 50' Common Ground Alliance 57 Call 48 Hours before digging: 1" = 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 50' 0' 0030343.00 6253 6250 PROJECT NUMBER: PLAN 6252 6251 6273 6271 TREE PRESERVATION 626062726270 6261 6259 6269 62686267 6274 6275 62636264 6262 62656266 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 OUTLOT D (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 PhoneFax 6394 6393 TREE PROTECTIONFENCE (TYP.) 6406 64056404 6391 6392 6464 6463 F P T 6465 6420 6403 64616462 6396 F P T 63996397 6395 64006398 64086407 COTTAGE GROVE, MN 641664186419 6409 6410 MISSISSIPPI LANDING 6412 6401 6402 4901 488648884887 4900 6460 4892487948904889 64216417 486648654864 17 64346433 6411 48584857 641364146415 644364444878 643848854881489148954896 4880 48624863 OUTLOT C 48944867 4859 16 64416437 F P T 642248424841 642464234893488348974898 4899 . 643664354838484048364868 4870 4882 5 4874 64326431 4843 48614852 4860 4849 48374839 6 6466 15 6467 6442 4844 4850 4853 48464856 F 7 64596426 6425P 642864274877 4876 T 4825 64456430 4845 64294834 13 48224824 64584835 8 64406439 48544855 9 64516455 486948734875 48714884 4872 LICENSE NO. 6457 4828 6600 6446 644748294831 14 64726471 10 644848234851 4848 48264827 64506449 MINNESOTA 6602 11 6601 13 6477 6475645648194821 12 483248334847 47884787 6505650748114818 65976594 6591 48204830 12/29/21 647364746598 6603 65906586 6587 64526454 650665086453 646864694810 65826585 481766044812 6605 47964789.DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF 65926606 47994802 F49999001 6514P 651347854784 4786 T 65936607 64706480 64796476 4740 65016500 65046503 6502 6588 6589 4801 4813 48144809 48084815 47384739 65994816 64876486648864906489 4737 6581 65786583 6580 4791 6584657947924790 65956596 4997 4793 4797480047954794 48034798 64846478 36 478147824783 6515 6483 6482 6481 4806480748054804 6499 19 4736 6498 6494 4993 18 4992 6552657665776573 4991 6516 64966497649564856491 499649944995 654565446543654765466550 6551 6520652265216523652765306528 652665344735 17 65536555 6575 47806574 6525 35 F 16 6519P 65176518 6554 T 649364924989 49884973 14 4975 65126511 653165486558 6532 498149874976 TREE PROTECTIONFENCE (TYP.) 6572 6571 653865246559 654965576556 12 4984 4951 4985 6570 6568 6541 FPT 6542 13 6561 47304732 65396540 65604733 47344990 4983 34 65296537 653565366533 656747784779 49864950 6566 6569 6565 6563 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 15 47716562 477647774979 49824980 472949474948 4949 4978 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 15 4959 4957 495449534952 33 47706564 47744775 4731 494349554941 4946 47724773 16 494249584956 472847234727 11 4945 47264944 14 32 4720 PREPARED FOR: 4725 4724 12 4769 472147054722 17 470747064719 9051 9052 91139114 90549053 9055 911191129122 4704 4709 13 10 31 4701 4702 9118 471547164717 4768 91169115 476647674708 469947034713 18 4718 471047114712 91239124 471446984700 91209121 476247644765 12 9125 91029101 9110 9 475447554756 30 91099107 47574763 4752 47504751 9117 9104910591069119 19 46974696 4749 9108 9126 46954694 9133 9132 9131 9130 9129 8 29 47534758 9103 4746 4759 91289127 20 46924693 4761 4760 91369137 46904691 7 4748 4747 91629161 9159 28..... 4745 915691579158 12/29/21 91389141 914991509155 21 91809164 91779182 9181 91359134 6 9185920992399238 91849206 918692059187 ..... 921192419240 92499248 47414689 920392049207 914391429146 92089210 91639183 9160 914591449147 INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: 92519252 27 5 9139 91409148 923792429243 9202 9201 91999268 91519267 915291549153 91889189 92479250 22 474447434742 9212 91659179 9213921492159229 92309236 91769175 91789174... 9216 5' 9197 9235 91669168916792179226 4 9190 OR 9200 468746884686 9198 10' 92459244924692539254 9221 50.000001' 26 925792619259 9260 9172 9169917392289227 9264926592639262 925592669256 23 9258 12 92259224 91709171919291919194 921991939195 91969218 9223 92229220 92329234923146734672 92334674 468346844685 F4677 4676 25 P T 4680 46814682 46784679 24 DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-TPP01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 150' 66 OF 100' 12/29/21 50' Common Ground Alliance 58 Call 48 Hours before digging: 1" = 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 50' 0' 0030343.00 63136314 6288 63116315 62866287629062896291629263036305 6304630663466347 62836284 63076310 63196318 63596361 6360 6333 6332 632063226321 62816285634563566357 6344 63486350635163536352 63346335 6308 6293 6301 6302 PROJECT NUMBER: PLAN 6330 62766277 62966294 6295 63096312 631663176323634263496358 6355 6354 63006299 627862796282628063626363 6331 63256324 6327632863366337 TREE PRESERVATION 6329 6326 63386339 6341 63406343 62976298 6364 6274 6275 6365 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 6374 6373 PhoneFax 6375 6379 63806378 6369 6376 6372 6394 6393 6368 63906389 63886387638563866381 638263776367 63716370 9270 9271 9269 63846383 6391 6392 9272 6366 4909 COTTAGE GROVE, MN 4910 4904 49024903 MISSISSIPPI LANDING 4907490849064911 4901 4900 49144905 90219020 9018 9019 4915 49134922 49124925 90309023 4923 4924 48974898 4899 . 9022 9024 90329031 49194920 9025 9026 491649174918 49274926 9027 90299028 LICENSE NO. 49364935 4932 49334921 MINNESOTA 4929 492890389037904190399040 9033 4931 4930 12/29/21 49374938 900390049005.DATE: 4934I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF 9034 499990019002 90449035 900790084939 4740 904390429036 47384739 4737 49989016 4997 90129006 49409009 OUTLOT E 901590149013 9011 9010 4993 4992 4991 499649944995 9017 4970 497349744977 4975 49674968 90469045 498149874976 90479048 49694972 4983 4965 49864950 49644971 4966 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 4979 49824980 49624963 9274927592769273 90499050 49784960 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 9278 9277 4959 4957 495449534952 4961 4731 494349554941 494249584956 92809279 PREPARED FOR: 9282 9281 9283 92859284 9286 9287 929092899288 92959292929392919294 ..... 12/29/21 9296 ..... INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: 9298 ... 5' OR 92999297 10' 50.000001' DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-TPP01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 OF 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance 59 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 0030343.00 PROJECT NUMBER: DATA TREE PRESERVATION 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 PhoneFax COTTAGE GROVE, MN MISSISSIPPI LANDING . LICENSE NO. MINNESOTA 12/29/21 .DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 PREPARED FOR: ..... 12/29/21 ..... INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: ... ### #### OR ### DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-TPP01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 OF 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance 60 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 0030343.00 PROJECT NUMBER: DATA TREE PRESERVATION 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 PhoneFax COTTAGE GROVE, MN MISSISSIPPI LANDING . LICENSE NO. MINNESOTA 12/29/21 .DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 PREPARED FOR: ..... 12/29/21 ..... INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: ... ### #### OR ### DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-TPP01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 OF 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance 61 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 0030343.00 PROJECT NUMBER: DATA TREE PRESERVATION 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 PhoneFax COTTAGE GROVE, MN MISSISSIPPI LANDING . LICENSE NO. MINNESOTA 12/29/21 .DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 PREPARED FOR: ..... 12/29/21 ..... INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: ... ### #### OR ### DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-TPP01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 OF 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance 62 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 0030343.00 PROJECT NUMBER: DATA TREE PRESERVATION 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 PhoneFax COTTAGE GROVE, MN MISSISSIPPI LANDING . LICENSE NO. MINNESOTA 12/29/21 .DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 PREPARED FOR: ..... 12/29/21 ..... INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: ... ### #### OR ### DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-TPP01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 OF 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance 63 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 0030343.00 PROJECT NUMBER: DATA TREE PRESERVATION 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 PhoneFax COTTAGE GROVE, MN MISSISSIPPI LANDING . LICENSE NO. MINNESOTA 12/29/21 .DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 PREPARED FOR: ..... 12/29/21 ..... INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: ... ### #### OR ### DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-TPP01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 OF 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance 64 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 0030343.00 PROJECT NUMBER: DATA TREE PRESERVATION 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 PhoneFax COTTAGE GROVE, MN MISSISSIPPI LANDING . LICENSE NO. MINNESOTA 12/29/21 .DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 PREPARED FOR: ..... 12/29/21 ..... INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: ... ### #### OR ### DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-TPP01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 OF 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance 65 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 0030343.00 PROJECT NUMBER: DATA TREE PRESERVATION 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 PhoneFax COTTAGE GROVE, MN MISSISSIPPI LANDING . LICENSE NO. MINNESOTA 12/29/21 .DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 PREPARED FOR: ..... 12/29/21 ..... INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: ... ### #### OR ### DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-TPP01.DWG MISSISSIPPI LANDING 66 OF 12/29/21 Common Ground Alliance 66 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 0030343.00 PROJECT NUMBER: DATA TREE PRESERVATION 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 PhoneFax COTTAGE GROVE, MN MISSISSIPPI LANDING . LICENSE NO. MINNESOTA 12/29/21 .DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 7500 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 670 PREPARED FOR: ..... 12/29/21 ..... INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: ... ### #### OR ### DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0030343.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\PRELIMINARY\\0030343C-TPP01.DWG LIFESTYLE COMMUNITIES COTTAGE GROVE-DUNES 8 OF 1 0035149.00 S ALL T S SHEETS SHEET: H T 0 0 1 S EVA Y ELDAH 01/05/22 PROJECT NUMBER: S T S D R 3 0 1 REVISION (NOT TO SCALE) SITE INITIAL SUBMITTAL DATE: Vicinity Map S L FOR FOR I SITE, GRADING AND UTILITIESCOTTAGE GROVE-DUNES LIFESTYLE COMMUNITIES COTTAGE GROVE, MN PRELIMINARY PLANS A RCLIENT COMMENTS......... T D U O L C Y E R G ......... DATE 01/18/22 1 NO. Sheet List Table Sheet Title CoverGrading & Drainage Plan Existing ConditionsSite PlanUtility PlanLandscape PlanDetailsDetails 134 25678 Sheet Number SHEET INDEX 0035149.00 BEN LANDHAUSER 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300 Minnetonka, MN 55343 RYAN M. BLUHM 319-551-6798 BEN@THISLIFESTYLE.COM (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 CONTACT: COTTAGE GROVE-DUNES 4938 LINCOHN DRIVE COTTAGE GROVE, MN PREPARED FOR:EDINA, MN 55436PHONE: EMAIL: LIFESTYLE COMMUNITIESLIFESTYLE COMMUNITIES SITE, GRADING AND UTILITIES CONTACT: PREPARED BY:PROJECT NUMBER: PRELIMINARY PLANS N:\\0035149.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\0035149C-CVF01.DWG LIFESTYLE COMMUNITIES COTTAGE GROVE-DUNES 8 150' OF 01/18/22 100' Common Ground Alliance 2 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com 50' DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 1" = 50' 0035149.00 0' PRELIMINARY PLANS STEEL/WOOD POSTSIGNMAIL BOXFLAG POLEHANDICAPPED STALLBENCHOIL MANHOLEOIL PUMP JACKOIL WELLMET TOWERWEATHER STATIONTURBINEIRRIGATION MANHOLEIRRIGATION SHIRRIGATION SPIRRIGATION VALVESOIL BORINGPERC TESTMONITORING WELLPIEZOMETERBUSH/SHRUBCONIFEROUS TREEDECIDUOUS TREESAGURABOUNDARY LINERIGHT-OF-WAY LINELOT LINEEASEMENT LINESECTION LINETREE LINECABLE TELEVISION LINEGAS LINEPOWER OVERHEADPOWER UNDERGROUNDSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERTELEPHONE OVERHEADTELEPHONE UNDERGROUNDWATERMAINFIBER OPTICFENCE LINECONTROLLED ACCESSCURB & GUTTERCONCRETE SURFACEBITUMINOUS SURFACEGRAVEL SURFACEWETLANDFOUND MONUMENT (SEE LABEL)SET MONUMENT (SEE LABEL) PROJECT NUMBER: PX O PJIR FO OWMW I.V.CTVSTO GASPOHPUGSANTOHTUG WAT EXISTING CONDITIONS SANITARY MANHOLESEWER CLEANOUTSEPTIC COVERSTORM MANHOLEBEEHIVE CATCH BASINCATCH BASINFLARED END SECTIONCULVERTCATCH BASIN MANHOLEDOWNSPOUTDRYWELLSTORM INTERCEPTORHYDRANTGATE VALVEWATER METERFIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONCURB STOP BOXWATER MANHOLEWELLPOST INDICATOR VALVEDOUBLE DETECTOR CHECK VALVEFARM HYDRANTREDUCE PRESSURE VALVESTOCK TANKWINDMILLELECTRIC BOXELECTRIC METERELECTRIC MANHOLEELECTRIC TOWERSTREET LIGHTPOWER POLE WITH LIGHTGUY WIREPOWER POLEMAST ARMMAST ARM W/ LIGHTTRAFFIC SIGNALTELEPHONE BOXTELEPHONE MANHOLEHAND HOLE/JUNCTION BOXCABLE TV BOXCABLE TV MANHOLEFIBER OPTIC MANHOLEFIBER OPTIC PEDESTALNATURAL GAS METERNATURAL GAS VALVENATURAL GAS MANHOLENATURAL GAS RISER/SERVICENATURAL GAS VENT PIPENATURAL GAS WELLAIR CONDITIONERUNKNOWN MANHOLEMISCELLANEOUS METERMISCELLANEOUS PEDESTAL I SEEETT GGGGMM WWW COMH LEGEND H O P 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 H O P (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 H O P PhoneFax H O P H O P H O P H O P H O P H O P H O P COTTAGE GROVE, MN H O P COTTAGE GROVE-DUNES LIFESTYLE COMMUNITIES X H O P X H O P X 41257 X H O P LICENSE NO. H O P MINNESOTA 01/18/22 H O P RYAN M. BLUHMDATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF H O P H O P 4 H O P 1 H O P 16 EDINA, MN 55436 4938 LINCOHN DRIVE LIFESTYLE COMMUNITIES A TE ER TS WATER PUMP PREPARED FOR: 1 0 1 0 5.06 0 X 0 05.06 . 3 4 7 X 5 6 0 0 . 0 3 6 2 2 B 0 1 T E E X R T S 0 0 . 0 2 6 22.66 05.26 X CLIENT COMMENTS.... 01/05/22 39 38 3 0 1 X 5 7 . 1 3 7 01/18/22.... A T E INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: E R X T S 4 ... 0 1 50 X B TEERTS OUTLOT B OUTLOT A 5 05.06 0 05.06 05.06 05.06 1 05.06 0 0 . 0 0 + 0 6 DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0035149.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\0035149C-EX01.DWG LIFESTYLE COMMUNITIES COTTAGE GROVE-DUNES 8 OF 150' 01/18/22 Common Ground Alliance 3 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: WETWOOD PROFESSIONAL 100' 50' TIP-OUT CURB AND GUTTERTRANSFORMERTRAFFIC SIGN PROPERTY LINELOT LINESETBACK LINEEASEMENT LINECURB AND GUTTERPOND NORMAL WATER LEVELRETAINING WALLFENCECONCRETE PAVEMENTCONCRETE SIDEWALKSTAMPED CONCRETE PAVEMENTHEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTNORMAL DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTNUMBER OF PARKING STALLSSITE LIGHTINGPOWER POLEBOLLARD / POSTSNOW STORAGE AREA 1" = 0035149.00 50' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. B618 5 XT 0' PRELIMINARY PLANS PROPOSED PROJECT NUMBER: SITE PLAN X EXISTING BACKGROUND INFORMATION FOR THIS PROJECT PROVIDED BY SERVICES, MINNETONKA, MN.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO BACK OF CURB OR EXTERIOR FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISEALL CURB RADII ARE SHALL BE 5.0 FEET (TO FACE OF CURB) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.ALL CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BETHE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFICAND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OFTHESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY AND ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT.TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MNDOT STANDARDS.ADJACENT PROPERTIES. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THISPLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITYLOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTIO N. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND, THEENGINEER SHOULD BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY.REFER TO BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR LOT BEARINGS, DIMENSIONS AND AREAS.NOTED.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OFEXITS, RAMPS, AND TRUCK DOCKS.CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGGERSBITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE SECTIONS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THERECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN FULL ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURINGCONSTRUCTION AND TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TOSITE LIGHTING SHOWN ON PLAN IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. REFER TO LIGHTING PLAN PREPAREDBY OTHERS FOR SITE LIGHTING DETAILS AND PHOTOMETRICS. SITE LEGEND 4. GENERAL SITE NOTES 2.3.5.6.7.8.9. 1.10.11. H O P S A GH H O P O FO P H O P S A H G H O OP O F P 16 SPACES16 SPACES86 SPACES25 SPACES 8 UNITS52 UNITS R-1 RURAL RESIDENTIALPUD7.45 AC32 SPACES4.0 SP./UN.111 SPACES2.1 SP./UN. 60 UNITS H O P S A G H OH OO P F P 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 H O P H SO P A G H O O F(952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 P H O P PhoneFax S A G H H O OO F P P GARAGES:DRIVEWAY SPACES:UNDERGROUND GARAGE:SURFACE SPACES: SENIOR TWINHOMES:SENIOR APARTMENTS: TOTAL SPACES: RATIO: (32 SPACES/8 UNITS) TOTAL SPACES: RATIO: (111 SPACES/52 UNITS) TOTAL HOMES: PROPOSED PARKING SUMMARYTOWNHOMES:APARTMENTS: EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: GROSS SITE AREA: DEVELOPMENT SUMMARYPROJECT DENSITY: (60 UNITS / 7.45AC.) H O P GROSS: SITE DEVELOPMENT DATA S A G H O O F P GARDEN RESIDENTPLOTS H O P TRAIL BITUMINOUS S A H O G H P O O F P H O P S A G H O O F P H O P COTTAGE GROVE, MN S A G H O O F P H POND O P COTTAGE GROVE-DUNES ' LIFESTYLE COMMUNITIES 6 . 5 0 1 S H A O GP H O O F P H O P O F TRAIL BITUMINOUS 41257 H O P O F H B O LICENSE NO. ADA P STALLS E MINNESOTA A H ' O 0 P . 0 01/18/22 O 2 F ' 0 . RYAN M. BLUHMDATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF COURTS6 PICKLEBALL H 2 ' O 0 . P 5 R ' H O D0 P . 9 H 1 O G P '0. 54R X CONCRETE WALK X H O' P 0' . 0 5 . 6 B 5 R R X X 1 ' 0 . 5 2 R H X O X' P 9 . 6 ' 2 0 ' . 0 . 5 1 6 6 X A ' 0.62 ' 0.02 O ' F 0 . 0 0 16 1 ' 0 . 7 3 R 0 0 . 0' 0 0 0. 0 +5 1 01 0R 1 O F EDINA, MN 55436 4938 LINCOHN DRIVE ' ' 4 . 0 . 4 6 2 2 ' 0 . 8 1 ' 0 A TE .ER 'TS S 2 A 4 .E O 1 FG' 8 R 7 1 . D 3 ' 1 .4 6 1 LIFESTYLE COMMUNITIES 1 0 S 1 05 .06 A 0 O 0 G F. 3 4 7 ' .0 7 2 D PREPARED FOR: 5 ' 6 S. 7 A 2 G FO ' 3 . 7 3 0 0 . 0 3 6 ' ' 5 . 54 2 . 3 8 1 S 2 A' 0 B O 0 FG' 1. 0 .6 2 7 T 2 E 'E 2 . 6 R 3 T S 0 0 . 0 2 6 F S A O' 0 G. F 0 2 R 22.66 39 MONUMENT SIGN 3 0 ' 10 . S 5 3 A O G F 5 7 . 1 3 7 A CLIENT COMMENTS.... T E 01/05/22 E R T S S A O G F 01/18/22.... 4 0 1 INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: S OUTLOT B A G FO OUTLOT A ... 50' 5 05.06 0 05.06 05.06 1 05.06 S A O 0 G 0 F. 0 0 + 0 6 0 6 1 23 SURMOUNTABLE CURBCONCRETE SIDEWALK B618 CURB AND GUTTERPEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPMATCH EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER SECTIONBITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (SEE DETAIL)MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL 4 6 S 0 1 A O G F ACG BDEF SITE KEY NOTES DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0035149.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\0035149C-SPF01.DWG LIFESTYLE COMMUNITIES COTTAGE GROVE-DUNES 150' 8 OF 100' 01/18/22 50' Common Ground Alliance 4 Call 48 Hours before digging: 1" = 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 50' 0' 0035149.00 PRELIMINARY PLANS PROJECT NUMBER: PLAN CURB AND GUTTERWATER MAINGRADING LIMITSTOP AND BOTTOM OF RETAINING WALL PROPERTY LINEINDEX CONTOURINTERVAL CONTOURPOND NORMAL WATER LEVELSTORM SEWERFLARED END SECTION (WITH RIPRAP)SANITARY SEWERRETAINING WALLDRAIN TILERIDGE LINESPOT ELEVATIONFLOW DIRECTIONEMERGENCY OVERFLOWSOIL BORING LOCATION 02 88 900.00TW=XXX.XX BW=XXX.XX GL 99 GRADING & DRAINAGE 0.00% PROPOSED E.O.F. 02 88 900.00 99 STO WATSAN EXISTING CONTRACTORS SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS ANDALL EXCAVATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARDSPECIFICATIONS FOR TRENCH EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL/SURFACE RESTORATION" ASALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE FOUR INCHES OF TOPSOIL AND SOD OR SEED.THESE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS OBTAINED. SEETHE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFICCONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGMENAND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OFTHESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. TRAFFICCONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MNDOT STANDARDS.ALL SLOPES SHALL BE GRADED TO 3:1 OR FLATTER, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THISSHEET.CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING AND PROVIDE ASMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITH UNIFORM SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONSARE SHOWN OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES.SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN INDICATE FINISHED PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS & GUTTER FLOWGRADE.SEE SOILS REPORT FOR PAVEMENT THICKNESSES AND HOLD DOWNS.CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF ANY EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL THAT EXISTS AFTER THE SITEGRADING AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OFALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL IN A MANNER ACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNER AND THE REGULATINGAGENCIES.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A STRUCTURAL RETAINING WALL DESIGN CERTIFIED BY AALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL RULES INCLUDING THEAPPROVED EQUAL, IN EACH OF 2 PERPENDICULAR DIRECTIONS WHILE UNDER SUPERVISIONAND DIRECTION OF THE INDEPENDENT TESTING LABORATORY. AREAS OF FAILURE SHALL BESHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORDINARYCOMPACTION METHOD AS OUTLINED IN MNDOT 2105.3F2.ALL SOILS AND MATERIALS TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY AN INDEPENDENTGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. EXCAVATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF REMOVING UNSTABLE ORCONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOILS TESTS AND LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THISPLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITYLOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTIO N. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIEDIMMEDIATELY IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND.DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULE, SLOPED PAVEMENT, EXIT PORCHES, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISEBUILDING DIMENSIONS, EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS, AND EXACTLOCATIONS AND NUMBER OF DOWNSPOUTS.PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA.LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR PLANTING AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT.LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE TO FINISHED SURFACE LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER.NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF ANY STRUCTURE OR PAVEMENT, A PROOF ROLL, AT MINIMUM, WILLBE REQUIRED ON THE SUBGRADE. PROOF ROLLING SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY MAKINGMINIMUM OF 2 COMPLETE PASSES WITH FULLY-LOADED TANDEM-AXLE DUMP TRUCK, OREXCAVATED AND RE-COMPACTED AS SPECIFIED HEREIN.EMBANKMENT MATERIAL PLACED BENEATH BUILDINGS AND STREET OR PARKING AREAS SHALLBE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFIED DENSITY METHOD AS OUTLINED INMNDOT 2105.3F1 AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.EMBANKMENT MATERIAL NOT PLACED IN THE BUILDING PAD, STREETS OR PARKING AREA,UNSUITABLE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REQUIRED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. THEINSPECTIONS WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 2.3.4.6.7.8.9. GRADING LEGENDGRADING NOTES 1.5.10.11.12.13.14.15.16. H H O P O O F P 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 H O P S A G H OH O O P F P H (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 O P H SO PhoneFax P A G H O O F P H O P S A G H H O O O F P P H O P S A G H O O F P H O P FM S AH GO H P O O F P FM H O P S COTTAGE GROVE, MN A G H O O F P H O P COTTAGE GROVE-DUNES LIFESTYLE COMMUNITIES SX A G H O O F P H O P X S H A O P G H X O O F P 41257 X H O P H OO F P LICENSE NO. H O P MINNESOTA H OO PF H 01/18/22 O P RYAN M. BLUHMDATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF H O P O F H O P H PO H PO O FX X H % O P 5 6 . 1 X- X 1 FO H X O X P X % 4 4 O. F 1 - 16 EDINA, MN 55436 4938 LINCOHN DRIVE M F 0 0 . 0 0 0% 0 +5 01 1 0. 13 - O F 65 0 0.00 +175 85 1 LIFESTYLE COMMUNITIES M F % 5 2 A . TE ER TS S 1 % A - O 9 G 5 F 55 . 5 WATER PUMP PREPARED FOR: M F 1 0 S 1 05.06 A 0 OX 0 G F. 3 4 7 4 5 % 5 X 3 . M 2 XF 1 5 S A O G F 0 0 . 0 X 3 6 M 2 F S 2 A 3 B 0 O G%5 F 1 4 4 . 1 T E X E X R T S 0 M 0 . F 0 2 6 3 S A O G F X 22.66 X CLIENT COMMENTS.... M 39 F 2 3 01/05/22 5 0 1 X S A O X G F 5 7 . 1 3 7 A 01/18/22.... T M E F X E R INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: X T 4 S S A O G F 4 5 06 M X 1 F 1 ... X 5 50 S OUTLOT B A G FO OUTLOT A M XF 5 05.06 0 05.06 05.06 05.06 1 S M AF O 0 X G 0 F . 0 0 + 0 6 DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0035149.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\0035149C-GD01.DWG LIFESTYLE COMMUNITIES COTTAGE GROVE-DUNES 8 OF 150' 01/18/22 Common Ground Alliance 5 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com 100'DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 50' 1" = 50' 0035149.00 PRELIMINARY PLANS 0' PROJECT NUMBER: CURB AND GUTTERSANITARY SEWERSANITARY SEWER FORCE MAINSTORM SEWERWATER MAINGASOVERHEAD ELECTRICOVERHEAD TELEPHONETELEPHONE FIBER OPTICCABLE TELEVISIONGATE VALVE PROPERTY LINEEASEMENT LINEHYDRANTUNDERGROUND ELECTRICUNDERGROUND TELEPHONEDRAIN TILEFLARED END SECTION (WITH RIPRAP)LIGHT POLE UTILITY PLAN FO FM CTV GASPUGPOHTOHTOH PROPOSED S FODT FM SANSTOGASPUGTUGTOHCTV WATWATPOH EXISTING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ANDCONFORM TO THE 2013 ED. OF THE "STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAINAND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION BYTHE CITY ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION OF MINN." AND TO THE "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FORCURRENT ADDENDUM. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO FOLLOW ALL PROCEDURESAS OUTLINED BY THE LOCAL AGENCY.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE THE NECESSARY PERMITS FOR ALL WORK OUTSIDE OF THEVERIFY EXISTING INVERT LOCATION & ELEVATION PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" FOR FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS NOTIFY THE OWNER OF ANY DIFFERENCES.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST. TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALLHIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION" MINN. DEPT. OF TRANS., AUGUST 31, 2016 INCLUDING THEPROPERTY LIMITS.PRIOR TO UTILITY INSTALLATION. 2.4. GENERAL UTILITY NOTES 1.3.5. UTILITY LEGEND FM 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 H O P S A G H OH O O P F P H O P FM (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 H SO P A G H PhoneFax O O F P FM H O P S A G H H O O O F P P M F H O P S A G H O O F P H O P M F S A H O G H P O O F P FM H O P S A G H COTTAGE GROVE, MN O O F P H MO P F COTTAGE GROVE-DUNES LIFESTYLE COMMUNITIES S X A G H O O F P H O P X M F S H A O P G H X O O F P 41257 M F X H O P H OO F P H O LICENSE NO. P MINNESOTA H OO PF H O P 01/18/22 RYAN M. BLUHMDATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF H O P H OO F P H MO FP H PO H H PO OO FX P X H O P M X FX 1 O F H X O X P M F X O F 16 EDINA, MN 55436 4938 LINCOHN DRIVE M F 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 + 0 1 0 1 O F 5 6 00 .00 +175 1 M F LIFESTYLE COMMUNITIES S A O G 5 F 5 WATER PUMP PREPARED FOR: M F 1 0 S 1 A 0 OX 0 G F. 3 4 7 4 5 X M 2 XF S A O G F 0 0 . 0 X 3 6 M 2 F S 2 A 3 B 0 O G 5 F 1 T E X E X R T S 0 M 0 . F 0 2 6 3 S A O G F X X M F 2 3 CLIENT COMMENTS.... 5 0 1 X S 01/05/22 A O X G F 5 7 . 1 3 7 A T 01/18/22.... M E F X E R X T 4 S S INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: A O G F 4 5 0 M X 1 F 1 X 5 ... 50 S OUTLOT B A G FO OUTLOT A M F X 5 0 5.06 0 05.06 05.06 1 S M AF O 0 X G 0 F . 0 0 + 0 06 0 5 0 . 0 0 06 + 0 5 DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0035149.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\0035149C-UT01.DWG LIFESTYLE COMMUNITIES COTTAGE GROVE-DUNES 8 OF H 20' W 20' H 50' W 30' MATURE SIZE H 50' W 35'-40' H 60' W 30'-40'H 60' W 30'-40' H 50'-75' W 50' H 12'-15' W 6'-8' H 70' W 40'-50' H 50'-60' W 40' H 30'-40' W 20'-30'H 60'-80' W 25'-30'H 40'-60' W 15'-30' H 50'-80' W 30'-40'H 60'-80' W 25'-30'H 15'-20' W 15'-20'H 25'-30' W 20'-25'H 15'-25' W 15'-25'H 40'-60' W 20'-30' H 40'-50' W 35'-40' H 50'-70' W 40'-50'H 50'-70' W 40'-50' H 50'-60' W 40'-50'H 60'-80' W 40'-60' 150' 01/18/22 Common Ground Alliance 6 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: AS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWN AS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWNAS SHOWN SPACING O.C. 100' 50' TOTAL AREA (0.4 AC)TOTAL AREA (0.3 AC)TOTAL AREA (0.3 AC) MESIC PRAIRIE GENERALSEED MIX (35-241)DENOTES STORMWATERNATIVE SEED MIX (33-261)DENOTES WET MEADOW S & WSEED MIX (34-271) 1" = 0035149.00 SIZE 6' HT., BB50' 1.75"/2.5" BB1.75"/2.5" BB1.75"/2.5" BB1.75"/2.5" BB1.75"/2.5" BB1.75"/2.5" BB1.75"/2.5" BB1.75"/2.5" BB1.75"/2.5" BB1.75"/2.5" BB1.75"/2.5" BB1.75"/2.5" BB6' HT., BB6' HT., BB6' HT., BB6' HT., BB6' HT., BB2" BB6' HT., BB CLUMP6' HT., BB CLUMP2" BB2" BB * ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE* ALL DISTURBED AREAS IN GRAY CLOUD TRAIL & 103RD STREET R.O.W. TO BE SEEDED WITH MESIC GENERAL ROADSIDE SEED MIX(25-141) NATIVE SEEDING LEGEND 0' PRELIMINARY PLANS PROJECT NUMBER: 37 TREES56 TREES 88 TREES 8 TREES 7 TREES 8 TREES 103 TREES 96 TREES 633 SHRUBS 40 SHRUBS 1,659 TREES 128 TREES 27 TREES LANDSCAPE PLAN QUANTITIES ON PLAN SUPERSEDE LIST QUANTITIES IN THE EVENT OF A DISCREPANCY. REFER TO FINALLANDSCAPE PLANS FOR SPECIES LOCATIONS AND QUANTITIES. TREES MARKED WITH A + INDICATED LIMITEDUSE SPECIES AND ARE NOT USED ON BOULEVARD. Black Hills Spruce / Picea glauca densataNorway Spruce / Picea abiesColorado Spruce / Picea pungensWhite Pine / Pinus strobus +Sienna Glen Maple / Acer x freemanii 'Sienna'Skyline Honeylocust / Gleditsia tricanthos var. inermis 'Skycole'White Oak / Quercus albaRed Oak / Quercus rubraNorthern Pin Oak / Quercus ellipsoidalisSwamp White Oak / Quercus bicolorSt. Croix Elm / Ulmus americana 'St. Croix'Yellowwood / Cladrastis kentuckeaKentucky Coffeetree / Gymnocladus dioicusAutumn Gold Ginkgo / Ginkgo biloba 'Autumn Gold'Hackberry / Celtis occidentalisTechny Arborvitae / Thuja occidentalis 'Techny'Thornless Cockspur Hawthorn / Crataegus crusgalli 'Inermis'Japanese Tree Lilac / Syringa reticulataAllegheny Serviceberry / Amelanchier laevisQuaking Aspen / Populus tremuloidesSpring Snow Crab / Malus 'Spring Snow' Accolade Elm / Ulmus japonica x wilsoniana 'Morton'Norway Pine / Pinus resinosa NOTES: COMMON/BOTANICAL NAME 8 375627 QTY. SYMBOL 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 4722.15 INCHES = 1,889 TREES 7 TREES (LIFESTYLE COMMUNITIES)223 TREES (MISSISSIPPI LANDING) 1,889 TREES REQUIRED - 1,659 TREES (EXISTING CREDIT) = 230 TREES TREESTREES TREES LARGESMALL OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS STREET TREES:OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS YARD TREES:CONIFEROUS TREES:ORNAMENTAL DECIDUOUS TREES: BUFFEROVERSTORY DECIDUOUS TREES: (SITE PERIMETER: 3,164 LF )MULTIFAMILY: 1 TREE PER 40 LINEAR FEETTOWHHOMES: 1 TREE PER 40 LINEAR FEET +1 STREET TREE PER UNITCONIFEROUS TREES: MULTIFAMILY: 30% OF OVERSTORY TREES TO BE CONIFEROUSTOWHHOMES: 1 PER TOWNHOME UNITORNAMENTAL DECIDUOUS TREES: MULTIFAMILY: MAY BE SUBSTITUTED AT 2:1 FOR OVERTORY TREES; MAX. 50%TOWHHOMES: MAY BE SUBSTITUTED AT 2:1 FOR OVERTORY TREES; MAX. 25%SHRUBS: (SITE PERIMETER: 3,164 LF )MULTIFAMILY: 1 SHRUB PER 5 LINEAR FEETTOWHHOMES: 1 SHRUB PER UNITEXISTING QUALIFYING TREES MAY BE CREDITED TOWARD THEREQUIRED TREES DETAILED IN THIS SECTION AT A RATE OF 1:1(SEE TREE INVENTORY: 1,659 QUALIFYING TREES SAVED)SEE MISSISSIPPI LANDING TREE PRESERVATION PLAN AND TREE INVENTORYFOR COMPLETE CALCULATIONS- 2.5 CAL. IN. PER DECIDUOUS TREE- 2 CAL. IN. PER 6' EVERGREEN TREE OVERSTORYDECIDUOUS OVERSTORYEVERGREENOVERSTORY STREET TREES (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 **** ****** MULTI FAMILY PROVISIONS TOTAL LANDSCAPE REQUIRED: TREE PRESERVATION REPLACEMENT: TOTAL LANDSCAPING PROVIDED: MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS EXISTING TREES PRESERVED CREDIT: REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED:REPLACEMENT TREES TO BE: PRELIMINARY PLANT SCHEDULELANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTSLANDSCAPE PROVISIONS PhoneFax H SO P A G H O O F P H O P S A G H H O O O F P P H O P S A G H O O F P H O P S A H O G H P O O F P H O COTTAGE GROVE, MN P S A G H O O F P H O COTTAGE GROVE-DUNES P LIFESTYLE COMMUNITIES S A G H O O F P H O P S H A O P G O F 53774 H O P O F LICENSE NO. H O P MINNESOTA 01/18/22 O F H O P NICHOLAS T. MEYERDATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF H O P H O P H O P H O P X X H O P X X 1 H X O X P X O F EDINA, MN 55436 16 4938 LINCOHN DRIVE M F O F LIFESTYLE COMMUNITIES M F A TE ER TS S A O G F PREPARED FOR: M F S 0 5.06 A 0 O 0 G F. 3 4 7 M F 5 S A O G F 0 0 . 0 3 6 M 2 F S A B O G F T E E R T S 0 M 0 . F 0 2 6 S A O G F 22.66 CLIENT COMMENTS.... 01/05/22 M 39 F S A O G F 5 7 . 1 01/18/22.... 3 7 A T M INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: E F E R T S S A O G F ... M 50' F S OUTLOT B A G FO OUTLOT A M F 05.0 6 05.06 05.06 05.06 S M AF O G F DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0035149.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\0035149C-LP01.DWG LIFESTYLE COMMUNITIES COTTAGE GROVE-DUNES 8 OF 01/18/22 Common Ground Alliance 7 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 0035149.00 PRELIMINARY PLANS PROJECT NUMBER: DETAILS 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 PhoneFax COTTAGE GROVE, MN COTTAGE GROVE-DUNES LIFESTYLE COMMUNITIES 41257 LICENSE NO. MINNESOTA 01/18/22 RYAN M. BLUHMDATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF EDINA, MN 55436 4938 LINCOHN DRIVE LIFESTYLE COMMUNITIES PREPARED FOR: CLIENT COMMENTS.... 01/05/22 01/18/22.... INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: ... ## ### OR ### DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0035149.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\0035149C-DT01.DWG LIFESTYLE COMMUNITIES COTTAGE GROVE-DUNES 8 OF 01/18/22 Common Ground Alliance 8 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com DATE: SHEET NUMBER: 0035149.00 PRELIMINARY PLANS PROJECT NUMBER: DETAILS 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300Minnetonka, MN 55343 (952) 937-5150(952) 937-5822(888) 937-5150 PhoneFax COTTAGE GROVE, MN COTTAGE GROVE-DUNES LIFESTYLE COMMUNITIES 41257 LICENSE NO. MINNESOTA 01/18/22 RYAN M. BLUHMDATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF EDINA, MN 55436 4938 LINCOHN DRIVE LIFESTYLE COMMUNITIES PREPARED FOR: CLIENT COMMENTS.... 01/05/22 01/18/22.... INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS: ... ## ### OR ### DESIGNED:CHECKED:DRAWN:HORIZONTAL SCALE:VERTICAL SCALE: N:\\0035149.00\\DWG\\CIVIL\\0035149C-DT01.DWG IJTUPSJDBM!FWBMVBUJPO 21412!Hsfz!Dmpve!Usbjm-!Dpuubhf!Hspwf Opwfncfs3132 686:UITUSFFUTF-TUF326}NJOOFBQPMJT-NO!!66525}723/954/5251}OFXIJTUPSZ/DPN Historical Evaluation 10301 Grey Cloud Trail Cottage Grove, Minnesota 55016 Prepared for: City of Cottage Grove 12800 Ravine Pkwy South Cottage Grove, MN 55016 By: New History 575 Ninth Street Southeast, Suite 215 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414 (612) 843-4140 www.newhistory.com For questions and comments: Lauren Anderson, anderson@newhistory.com Meghan Elliott, elliott@newhistory.com (612) 843-4140 ©2021 New History UBCMF!PG!DPOUFOUT! Executive Summary1 Site History 2 Historic Context 2 10301 Grey Cloud Trail 5 City of Cottage Grove Local Designation 11 Past Determinations of Historic Significance11 Designation Criteria11 Integrity 12 National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) Designation12 Sources Consulted 14 Appendix A: Current Photos 1 FYFDVUJWF!TVNNBSZ This report summarizes our historical research on the 10301 Grey Cloud Trail property in Cottage Grove. The purpose of our research was to provide additional information on the history of the site. We have also provided our preliminary recommendations and professional opinion on the property’s ability to qualify for local landmark and National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) designation. Site History: The current site features a house and barn on 2.75 acres of land. The house was likely constructed between 1850 and 1886. The associated barn was constructed at an unknown date, but it is possible that it dates to the same time period. From the time of its construction until the mid-1900s, the property was associated with dozens of acres of surrounding farm land. For most of its history, the house appears to have primarily operated as a single-family residence for individuals and/or families who farmed the surrounding acreage. Past Determinations of Historic Significance: The property is not currently locally designated as a historic site. A 1990 survey of Cottage Grove recommended the property for additional research and local designation. The property is not currently listed on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Local Landmark Designation: For a property to be locally designated by the City of Cottage Grove, it must demonstrate historical significance by meeting at least one of the City’s five criteria for designation and retain integrity (the physical materials and features that were present during the time when the property achieved historical significance). Based on our research, we believe that the property meets Criterion 1 for its association with Cottage Grove’s history as a rural, agricultural community. Additionally, the property likely meets Criterion 4 as a unique local example of limestone building construction. The building has experienced several alterations since its construction, which may impact its integrity. National Register of Historic Places Designation: For a property to be listed on the National Register, it must demonstrate historic significance by meeting at least one of the National Park Service’s Criteria for Evaluation and retain integrity. Based on our research, additional information is needed to assess the property’s eligibility for the National Register. Alterations to integrity may pose a challenge to NRHP listing. 1 TJUFIJTUPSZ IJTUPSJD!DPOUFYU! 10301 Grey Cloud Trail is located in the southwest corner of thecity of Cottage Grovein Section 30 of Township 27 North, Range 21 West. Historically, the house and barn on this property were surrounded by and associated with dozens of acres of farmland, and they are best understood within the context of the agricultural history of Cottage Grove. This section presents a brief summary of this agricultural history followed by an in-depth discussion of the history of the property itself. The City of Cottage Grove is located between the Mississippi and St. CroixRivers in an area historically known as the St. Croix Triangle (modern-day Washington and Ramsey Figure 1.1847 plat mapof Township 27 North, Range 21 West. Section 30 is highlighted in red. Map courtesy of United States Bureau of Land Management and Counties). Most of the land theMinnesota General Land Office. within the boundaries of modern-day Cottage Groveis located in Township 27 (see Figure 1). Township 27 was first surveyed in 1847when the St. Croix Triangle was claimed by the United States government as part 1 of Wisconsin Territory. The area was subsequentlyincorporated into Minnesota Territoryin 1849. The first Euro-American settler in the Cottage Grove area was likely James Sullivan Norris, who staked his claimto a portion of Section 12of Township 27 in 1843. Norris was followed by 1th George W. Jones, “Township No. 27N, Range No. 21 West 7Mer.,” March 15, 1848, United States Bureau of Land Management, GeneralLand Office Historic Plat Map Retrieval System, https://www.mngeo.state.mn.us/glo/index.html; Robert Vogel, The New England of the West: A Survey of Historic Properties Associated with Early American Settlement in Cottage Grove (City of Cottage Grove, September 1990), 12; Robert Vogel, Cottage Grove History: A Palimpset (Advisory Committee on Historic Preservation, City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota, 1997), 2 –3. 2 other Euro-Americansmostly from New England states,such as New York, Maine, Vermont, and New Hampshire.According to historian Robert Vogel, “by C M & SP 1855,Cottage Grove was one of the fastest-growing rural townships in Minnesota, with schools, churches, a lyceum hall, and perhaps twenty or thirty 2 farms.”The township of CB & Q Cottage Grove was officially organized in May of 1858, days afterMinnesota achieved 3 statehood. Cottage Grove’s earliest settlers were largely subsistence farmers who cultivated spring 4 wheat or potatoes as cash crops. By 1871, concentrated settlement within thetownship was limited totwo small villages –East Cottage Grove in Section Figure 2.1886plat map of the Cottage Grove area showing theChicago, Milwaukee, and St. Paul Railroad(C M & St P) and the Chicago, Burlington and 12, near the northeast corner of Quincy (C B & Q) Railroads. Location of Section 30 indicated in red. Map courtesy of the township, and Langdonin the University of Minnesota’s UMedia. Section 21,near the center of the township. Cottage Grovewas originally connected to river towns along the Mississippi River and St. Croix River via wagon roads. The township received its first railroad line in 1869 when the St. Paul and Chicago Railroad (later the Chicago, Milwaukee, and St. Paul Railroador C M & SP) constructed a station at Langdon(see Figure 2). The Chicago, Burlington, and Quincy (CB & Q) 2 Vogel, Cottage Grove History, 2 –3; Duane D. Fisher, “The Development of Cottage Grove, The First Rural Settlement in Minnesota,” term paper (Macalaster College, 1954), 5; Robert C. Vogel, “Historic Houses of Cottage Grove: A Field Guide,” Perspectives in Cottage Grove History, no. 1 (February 1986), “A Brief History of Cottage Grove,” on file at the Minnesota Historical Society, St. Paul, Minnesota; Robert Vogel, Preliminary Inventory of Pre- 1940 Houses in the City of Cottage Grove, (Prepared for the City of Cottage Grove Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission and the Advisory Committee on Historic Preservation, September 1988), 9. 3 Edward D. Neill, A History of Washington County and the St. Croix Valley: Including the Explorers and Pioneers of Minnesota (Minneapolis, MN: Northstar Publishing Company, 1881), 328. 4 Vogel, The New England of the West, 10 –12. 3 was extended through the township in the late 1880s, passing along the southwest edge of Cottage 5 Grove Township to connect Prescott, Wisconsin to St. Paul (see Figure 2). During the early 1860s, the Civil War created an increased demand for grain and livestock. This demand, combined with the arrival of the railroads and innovations in farm machinery, shifted the focus of agricultural production in Cottage Grove from subsistence farming to commercial agriculture. Throughout Washington County, the number of farms and the amount of acreage under cultivation increased. Concurrently, Cottage Grove experienced a second wave of immigration, including newcomers from Germany, Scandinavia, England, and Ireland. Until about 1880, agricultural production focused on wheat, which was sold and shipped to other locations. During the late 1800s, farmers expanded beyond wheat into feed grains (such as corn and oats), 6 raising livestock, and dairy farming. Demand for agricultural products remained strong through the first World War, benefitting Cottage Grove farmers. However, increased agricultural production during this time period led to a decrease in farmland value in the 1920s. This was followed by the Great Depression of the 1930s, which brought economic challenges for farmers. According to Vogel, the result of this period of economic strain was that farming “became less of a way of life and more a highly competitive 7 In the years following World War II, the business, with fewer farmers producing more goods.” number of Washington County farms decreased, and the average farm size became larger. Agriculture continued as Cottage Grove’s primary economic driver until into the 1950s, when the community began to develop into a residential suburb. Between 1958 and 1960 alone, 1,200 houses were constructed in the township. Cottage Grove grew rapidly, with 800 residents in 1950, 5,000 residents in 1960, 14,300 residents in 1970, and a population of 25,000 in 1995. The Village of 8 Though the city has evolved Cottage Grove was incorporated in 1965; it became a city in 1974. substantially from its nineteenth century origins, it still retains a considerable amount of land within 9 its borders that is zoned for agricultural and rural residential uses. 5 Robert Vogel, A History of Washington County: Gateway to Minnesota History (Stillwater, MN: Washington County Historical Society, 2008), 231 – 232; Andrew J. Schmidt, Daniel Pratt, Andrea Vermeer, and Betsy Bradley, Railroads in Minnesota, 1862 – 1956, Multiple Property Documentation Form, 2013, Section E, page 51; Neill, A History of Washington County and the St. Croix Valley, 336, 372; Vogel, Cottage Grove History, 3 – 6. 6 Vogel, The New England of the West, 12 - 13; Carole Zellie, Washington County Historic Contexts (prepared for Washington County Land Management, 1999), 165; Vogel, “Historic Houses of Cottage Grove,” 3. 7 Vogel, The New England of the West, 24; Zellie, Washington County Historic Contexts, 167. 8 Vogel, “Historic Houses of Cottage Grove,” 5; Robert Vogel, Cottage Grove History, 5; Willard E. Rosenfelt, Washington: A History of the Minnesota County (Stillwater, MN: Croixside Press, 1977), 244; MetroCouncil, “Cottage Grove: Suburban Edge Where Urban Meets Farmland and Open Space,” July 17, 2017, https://metrocouncil.org/News-Events/Communities/Newsletters/Cottage-Grove-Suburban-edge-where-urban- meets-far.aspx. 9 City of Cottage Grove, “Cottage Grove 2016 Zoning Map,” June 13, 2016, https://listingsprod.blob.core.windows.net/ourlistings-usa/fc2443b4-28bc-40f6-9d13-a4f09a816bcc/b8b4f092- f528-40e2-985b-cb191fc16a0a. 4 21412!Hsfz!Dmpve!Usbjm This broader history of Cottage Grove is reflected in the history of 10301 Grey Cloud Trail. Today, the property NWNE addressed at 10301 Grey Cloud Trail includes a house and barn on 2.75 acres of land in the northeast quarter of Section 30 of Township 27. For most of its history, however, the property has comprised a SWSE small portion of much larger parcels of farm 10 land. The earliest recorded owner of the northeastquarter of Section 30 was NW NE Alexander Fell, a private in theSixth Regiment of the United States Infantry. Fell received 160 acres of land –the northeast and northwestquarters of Section 30 and SE SW the southeastand southwestquarters of Section 19 (see Figure 2) –under the Scrip Warrant Act of 1850, which providedfree Figure 3.1850 land grant and current parcel boundaries. Red land to United States military veterans. As dashed lines indicate section and quarter boundaries. Background was common practice for recipients of these map courtesy of Washington County. grants, Fell granted or sold his rights to this 11 land to Jeremiah Lamb, who filed a claim for the property with the General Land Office in 1854. More research is necessary to determine the property’s earliest owners with certainty. However, Washington County property records suggest that the south half of the northeast quarter 12 of Section 30 was owned by a succession of at least threeindividualsbetween 1854 and1864.These included William B. Dibble, Louis \[Lewis\] Dibble, and Peter Pfiefer. According to ahistory of the St. Croix River Valleywritten in 1881, William Burris Dibble wasone of the early Euro-American settlersof Washington County. Born in New York in 1815, Dibble moved toMarine Mills (11 miles north of current day Stillwater)by 1838. Around 1845, Dibble moved to Point Douglas in Denmark Townshipto the east of Cottage Grove. Dibble’s first wife, Eliza, died in 1847, and Dibble remarried 10 Washington County Property Information, https://maps.co.washington.mn.us/wcgis/. 11 Military Warrant, accession number MW-0759-034, March 3, 1854, General Land Office, https://glorecords.blm.gov/details/patent/default.aspx?accession=0759- 034&docClass=MW&sid=jq5vpuvb.sfl#patentDetailsTabIndex=1; James W. Oberly, “Military Bounty Land Warrants in the United States, 1847-1900,” February 17, 1992, ICPSR, https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09514.v1 12 The completion of a chain of title for the property was beyond the scope of this research. More research is necessary to confirm early ownership of the property. See tract pages for the northeast quarter of Section 30, Township 27, Range 21, on file at the Washington County Property Records and Taxpayer Services, Stillwater, MN. 5 Mary Ann Wright in 1853. Dibble appears to have continued to farm in Point Douglas until his death in 1883. It is unclear why Dibble acquired land in Cottage Grove Township. Given his brief 13 ownership of the property, the land may have been a speculative investment. The next owner of the property, Louis (or Lewis) Dibble, is listed in the 1857 Minnesota Territorial Census as a resident of Point Douglas. By 1860, Louis was living in Cottage Grove and considered farming his primary occupation. As Louis was also from New York, he may have been related to William. At the time of 14 the 1860 census, Louis and his wife Hannah had five children. Little is known about Peter Pfiefer; research did not reveal any definitive information about this individual. The next owner of the property, William Cowan, appears to have acquired the land from Peter Pfiefer in 1873. By 1886, a plat map of Cottage Grove indicates that Cowan owned 247 acres in Section 30, including the 2.75 acres that now comprise the 10301 Grey Cloud Trail property. Cowan is listed as a resident of Cottage Grove in both the 1875 and 1885 Minnesota Territorial Censuses. Cowan, who was 56 years old at the time of the 1875 census, was a native of Scotland. His wife Harriet (45 years old in 1875) was born in Canada, while two younger household members – Hannah (18) and Harriet (14) – were also born in Scotland. By 1885, three individuals named John 15 (28), Anna (26), and Harriet (23) were residing with William and Harriet. The 1886 plat map of Cottage Grove shows a structure on Cowan’s property in the location of the current house, just to the east of the road that is now Grey Cloud Trail and west of the tracks of the CB & Q Railroad (see Figure 4). Possibly, this structure is the existing two-and-one-half- story, gable-roofed, limestone house. No historic photographs of the property have been uncovered. Based on its existing appearance, the house was not designed as high-style architecture. Rather, like most of the pre-1940 houses in Cottage Grove, it is best classified as “folk” or “vernacular” 13 Minnesota State Population Census Schedules, 1875, Washington County, Denmark Township, family 117, accessed via Ancestry.com; United States Bureau of the Census, Tenth Census of the United States, Minnesota, Washington County, Denmark Township, dwelling no. 213; “William B. Dibble,” Minnesota, U.S., Marriages Index, 1849-1950, ancestry.com; “William Burris Dibble,” Find a Grave Index, 1600s-Current, Ancestry.com; “Marine Mills,” Minnesota Historical Society, accessed November 18, 2021, https://www.mnhs.org/media/kits/marinemill; Neill, A History of Washington County and the St. Croix Valley, 193, 260, 326, 354 – 361, 477. 14 Vogel, The New England of the West, 54; United States Bureau of the Census, Eighth Census of the United States, 1860, Washington County, Cottage Grove, dwelling no. 1376, Ancestry.com; Minnesota Territorial Census, 1857, Washington County, Cottage Grove, dwelling no. 634, Ancestry.com. 15 Tract pages for northeast quarter of Section 30, Township 27, Range 21, on file at the Washington County Property Records and Taxpayer Services Department, Stillwater, Minnesota; Minnesota State Population Census Schedules, 1865-1905, 1875, Washington County, Cottage Grove, family no. 124, Ancestry.com; Minnesota State Population Census Schedules, 1865-1905, 1885, Minnesota, Washington County, Cottage Grove, family no. 91, Ancestry.com; Warner and Foote, Map of Ramsey and Washington Counties: with Adjacent Portions of Anoka, Dakota & Hennepin counties, Minnesota, and Parts of St. Croix & Pierce Counties, Minnesota (Minneapolis, MN: Warner and Foote, 1886), Sheet 7. 6 architecture. The house’s limestone walls are now covered with stucco (installed in the 1960s or 1970s) but were originally exposed. This limestone may have been obtained from one of several locallimestone quarrieshistorically present within Cottage Grove. Vogel notes that the house at 10301 Grey Cloud Trail is one of only a few buildings in Cottage Grove constructed completely of this materialand the only one of thecity’s 140 housesbuilt before 1940 that is 16 not constructed of wood.Though not an example of high-style architecture, the building’sfront gabledform reflects a common subtype of theGreek Revival style, which was popular in the United Figure 4. 1886 plat map of the Cottage Grove area showing Section 30.Map courtesy of the University of Minnesota’s UMedia. States from about 1825 until about 1860.According to a description of the housein a 1990 architectural-history survey, it formerly had a front entry portico, another 17 feature of Greek Revival houses.Like the house, the existing barn cannot be dated with certainty. However, a 1990 study of barns in Cottage Grove found that the oldest are generally simple gable- roofed structures like this one, suggesting that the barn was likely constructed in the nineteenth 18 century. By 1901, William Cowan had sold much of his land, retaining only19.25 acres to the west of modern-day Grey Cloud Trail. The new owner of most of Cowan’s former land (200.95 acres) was 16 Vogel, Preliminary Inventory of Pre-1940 Houses, 181; Robert Vogel, “Minnesota Historic Properties Inventory Form,” WA-CGC-034, Okey House, 1984, on file at the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office, St. Paul, Minnesota; Vogel, The New England of the West, 53. 17 Vogel, Preliminary Inventory of Pre-1940 Houses, 180, 183; Virginia McAlester, A Field Guide to American Houses, rev. ed (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2014), 134 –136. 18 Larry Klueh, “Barns in the City: Agrarian Landmarks in Cottage Grove,” Perspectives in Cottage Grove History, No. 4 (August 1989), 6; Vogel, Preliminary Inventory ofPre-1940 Houses, 11 –12. 7 19 listed as the Security Trust Company(see Figure 5).Little is known about this firm. Preliminary newspaper research suggests that it was based in St. Pauland specialized in 20 backing mortgages and bonds. The next available plat map of Cottage Grove, dated 1912, showsDorothea Fritz as the owner of these 200.95 acres(see Figure 6). Fritz, who immigrated from Germany in 1888, was married to Minnesotanative Herbert Casper Fritz.According to the 1910 federal census, farming wasHerbert’s primary occupation.Though the 1912 plat map does not show the location of residential Figure 5. 1901 plat map of Cottage Grove structures, census information indicates that the Fritz family showing Section 30.Map courtesy of Minnesota owned a mortgaged farm, indicatingthat there were still Digital Library. buildings on the Fritz propertyat this date. At the time of the 1910 census, the family had a three-year-old daughter Dorothea, a two-year-old son Anthony, and an infant named Herbert. A hired laborer, Lanis Perow, also lived with the family.Another daughter, Clara, was born to the 21 couple in 1912. The elder Dorothea died in 1916, and her property was distributed to her children and husband. By 1926, 76.95 acressurrounding the 10301 Grey Cloud Trail property wereowned by “DorotheaFritz et. al.,” presumably, the younger Dorothea and her siblings(see Figure 6. 1912 plat map of Cottage Grove 22 Figure 7). showing Section 30.Map courtesy of Minnesota Digital Library. 19 Northwest Publishing Company, Plat Book of Washington County, Minnesota (Minneapolis, MN: Northwest Publishing Company, 1901), Sheet 41. 20 See for example “Notice of Mortgage Sale,” St. Paul Globe, January 18, 1885, p. 7; “Money Has Been Paid for Bonds,” Bemidji Daily Pioneer, June 24, 1909, p. 1. 21 The Farmer,The Farmer’s Atlas and Directory of Washington County, Minnesota (St. Paul, MN: Webb Publishing Company, 1912), Sheet 27; United States Bureau of the Census, Thirteenth Census of the United States, 1910, Minnesota, Washington County, Cottage Grove Township, District 0166, Sheet 7B, accessed via Ancestry.com; United States Bureau of the Census, Fourteenth Census of the United States, 1920,Minnesota, Washington County, Cottage Grove Township, District 0169, Sheet 6A, accessed via Ancestry.com 22 Samuel Larson and George Tibbets, “Inventory and Appraisement in the Matter of the Estate of Dorothea Fritz,” February 20, 1917, and “Final Decree of Distribution in the Matter of the Estate of Dorothea Fritz,” June 18, 1917, Probate Case File No. 4358-4395, 1916 –1917, accessed via Ancestry.com; Hudson Map Company, 1926 Plat Map of Washington County; “Dorothea Fritz,” Find a Grave Index, 1600s-Current, Ancestry.com. 8 By 1938, these 76.95 acres had passed to Otto J. Radusch(see Figure 8). Otto is not listed in the 1940 census for Washington County, so little is known about his background. Accordingto a 1990 historical architecture survey of the property, the house’sone-story addition dates to 1942, so it is possible that this addition was constructed 23 The next available plat map, dated 1949, by Radusch. shows Anthony and Mary Kulvich as the owners. By1956, the property had passed to Mary O’Boyle(see Figure 10). Little information could be uncovered about either of these 24 occupants. Figure 7. 1926 plat map of Cottage Grove During the mid-twentieth century,Section 30 did not showing Section 30. Map courtesy of the University of Minnesota’s John R. Borchert Map experience immediate subdivision and residential Library. developmentas did some other areas ofCottage Grove. A 1964 aerial photograph indicates that this portion of Cottage Grove was still relatively undeveloped at that time (see Figure 9). By1969, the five acres surrounding the Cowan Househad been parceled offfrom the rest of the surrounding landand were owned by an individual identified on plat maps only as“E.B.” Changes made to the house in the 1960s or 1970s include the addition of shed- roofed dormers to the north and south elevations and the addition of stucco to the exterior. In 1972, 10301 Grey Cloud Trail was included (apparently for the first time) in the South and West St. Paul city directory; its owner was listed as Mary Okey. From 1973 until at least the mid- 1980s, much of the surroundingland around the subject Figure 8.1938plat map of Cottage Grove property was owned by Mary O’Boyle. Some or all of this showing Section 30.Map courtesy of the Library land was sold in the early 1990sto develop the existing golf of Congress. 25 course.By 1995, 10301 Grey Cloudconsisted of the 2.75- 23 Vogel, The New England of the West, 53. 24 Hudson Map Company, Plat Book of Washington County, Minnesota (Minneapolis, MN: Hudson Map Company, 1938), 19; Atlas Company, Plat Book of Washington County, Minnesota (St. Paul, MN: Atlas Map Company, c. 1949); Thomas Nelson Company, Atlas of Washington County, Minnesota, 1956, “Cottage Grove,” https://www.co.washington.mn.us/DocumentCenter/View/1912/1956_platbook. 25 Vogel, Preliminary Inventory of Pre-1940 Houses, 92; “Village of Cottage Grove,” map, Rockford Map Publishers, 1969, on file at the John R. Borchert Map Library; “Village of Cottage Grove,” map, Rockford Map Publishers, 1973, on file at the John R. Borchert Map Library; “Village of Cottage Grove,” map, Rockford Map Publishers, 1976, on file at the John R. Borchert Map Library; “East Part of Village of Cottage Grove,” map, Rockford Map Publishers, 1982, on file at the John R. Borchert Map Library; “East Part of Village of Cottage Grove,” map, Rockford Map Publishers, 9 acre parcelthat it is today. FollowingMary Okey’s death in c. 1995, the property was owned by the Thompson family and then Doebler Real Estate before it was purchased in 2019 by the adjacentgolf 26 course. Figure 9.1964 aerial photograph of the Figure 10.1956 plat map of Cottage Grove southwest corner of Cottage Grove.Photograph showing Section 30.Map courtesy of the courtesy of the University of Minnesota’s John R. University of Minnesota’s John R. Borchert Map Borchert Map Library. Library. 1986, on file at the John R. Borchert Map Library; personal communication, Mike Mrosla, November 12, 2021; R. L. Polk & Co., Polk’s South St. Paul and West St. Paul City Directory (St. Paul, MN: R. L. Polk & Co., 1972), 177. 26 Quit Claim Deed, November 15, 2019, Document No. 4218540, on fileat Washington County Property Records and Taxpayer Services; Limited Warranty, April 20, 2005, Document No. 3517977, on file at Washington County Property Records and Taxpayer Services; Quit Claim Deed, August 9, 1999, Document No. 3063839, on file at Washington County Property Records and Taxpayer Services; Personal Representative Deed, June 28, 1995, Document No. 849102, on file at Washington County Property Records and Taxpayer Services. 10 DJUZ!PG!DPUUBHF!HSPWF!MPDBM!EFTJHOBUJPO! QBTU!EFUFSNJOBUJPOTPG!IJTUPSJD!TJHOJGJDBODF 10301 Grey Cloud Trail is not currently locally designated by the City of Cottage Grove, nor is it listed on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). In 1990, a history-architectural survey noted that the property “could probably be nominated to the City Register of Historic Sites and Landmarks solely on the basis of its architectural significance.” However, the survey also recommended additional research “to firmly establish its 27 historical associations.” EFTJHOBUJPO!DSJUFSJB! The City of Cottage Grove defines historic resources as properties that meet any one of five criteria as outlined in Chapter 9 of the City Code of Cottage Grove, Minnesota. The criteria that must be considered when determining the historic significance of a property include: 1. Its character, interest, or value as part of the history or cultural heritage of the city, the state or the United States; 2. Its association with persons or events that have made a significant contribution to the cultural heritage of the city; 3. Its potential to yield information important in history or prehistory; 4. Its embodiment of distinguishing characteristics of architectural type or style, or elements of design, detail materials or craftsmanship; and 5. Its unique location or singular physical appearance representing an established or familiar visual feature of a neighborhood or community of the City. Our research on the history of the property suggests that the property may be historically significant under Criterion 1 for its association with Cottage Grove’s history as an agricultural community and under Criterion 4 as a unique local example of limestone construction. Our research did not uncover any associations with significant persons or events (Criterion 2) or suggest that the property represents an established and familiar feature of its neighborhood (Criterion 5). No information was uncovered to suggest that the property was formerly used as a hotel. It is unknown if the property meets Criterion 3 as it has not been evaluated for archaeological significance. 27 Vogel, New England of the West, 53 – 54. 11 JOUFHSJUZ! In order to be locally designated, a property must not only meet criteria for historic significance but also retain integrity. In other words, it must retain enough of its physical features and materials to convey its historic significance. As Chapter 9 of the City Code of Cottage Grove does not provide criteria for evaluating integrity, we have considered the integrity of the subject property using the National Park Service (NPS) definition of integrity. According to the National 28 Register Bulletin How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation,a property’s integrity is recognized through seven aspects or qualities: 1)Location 2)Setting 3)Design 4)Workmanship 5)Materials 6)Feeling 7)Association Research and on-site investigation suggest that the property has experienced some significant alterations since its original construction. There have been some changes to the property’s setting, most noticeably the development of the golf course to the southeast. Alterations to the house’s original materials, design, and workmanship include a one-story addition added around 1942, roof dormers added in the 1960s, stucco cladding applied to the exterior in the mid-1960s or early 1970s, and roofing replaced with asphalt shingles at an unknown date. Additionally, it is likely the house originally had an entrance portico later replaced by a porch, which has since been removed. Though in poor condition, the associated barn appears to retain much of its original materials, design, and workmanship. The property appears to meet local Criterion 1 and Criterion 4 for historic significance. However, alternations to the property have impacted integrity. It may no longer be eligible for local designation due to the loss of integrity. OBUJPOBM!SFHJTUFS!PG!IJTUPSJD!QMBDFT!)OSIQ*!EFTJHOBUJPO NRHP listing and local designation are two separate processes and designations. NRHP listing is overseen by the NPS and must meet NPS requirements for historical significance and integrity. The NPS Criteria for Evaluation define historically significant properties as properties: A.That are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or 28 National Park Service, How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation, rev. ed. (Washington, D.C.: 1995), 44, https://www.nps.gov/subjects/nationalregister/upload/NRB-15_web508.pdf. 12 B.That are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or C.That embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or 29 D.That have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Significant changes to the house since its construction might pose a challenge to listing the property on the NRHP. Additionally, more information is needed to determine if the property has historical significance under NPS Criteria for Evaluation. This includes: Additional research to compile a complete list of all building owners and occupants Comparison against similar properties in Cottage Grove to determine if this property is unique and therefore more likely to be significant Determination of a period of significance for the property (the time period during which the property obtained historical significance) Additional research is needed to determine if the property has historical significance as defined by the NPS Criteria for Evaluation. Alterations to the property have impacted integrity, and it may not be eligible for the NRHP due to a loss of integrity. ! 29 National Park Service, How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation, rev. ed. (Washington, D.C.: 1995), 2, https://www.nps.gov/subjects/nationalregister/upload/NRB-15_web508.pdf. 13 TPVSDFT!DPOTVMUFE! Atlas Company. Plat Book of Washington County, Minnesota. St. Paul, MN: Atlas Map Company, c. 1949. Find a Grave Index, 1600s-Current. Ancestry.com. Fisher, Duane D. “The Development of Cottage Grove, The First Rural Settlement in Minnesota.” Term paper, Macalaster College, 1954. On file at the Minnesota Historical Society, St. Paul, Minnesota. Hudson Map Company. 1926 Plat Map of Washington County. On file at the John R. Borchert Map Library, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. Hudson Map Company. Plat Book of Washington County, Minnesota. Minneapolis, MN: Hudson Map Company, 1938. https://www.loc.gov/item/2007633510/. th Jones, George W. “Township No. 27N, Range No. 21 West 7 Mer.” March 15, 1848. United States Bureau of Land Management. General Land Office Historic Plat Map Retrieval System, https://www.mngeo.state.mn.us/glo/index.html. Klueh, Larry. “Barns in the City: Agrarian Landmarks in Cottage Grove.” Perspectives in Cottage Grove History, No. 4. August 1989. McAlester, Virginia. A Field Guide to American Houses. Rev. ed. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2014. Military Warrant, accession number MW-0759-034, March 3, 1854, General Land Office, https://glorecords.blm.gov/details/patent/default.aspx?accession=0759- 034&docClass=MW&sid=jq5vpuvb.sfl#patentDetailsTabIndex=1. Minnesota State Population Census Schedules, 1875 and 1885. Accessed via Ancestry.com. Minnesota Territorial Census, 1857. Accessed via Ancestry.com. Neill, Edward D. A History of Washington County and the St. Croix Valley: Including the Explorers and Pioneers of Minnesota. Minneapolis, MN: Northstar Publishing Company, 1881. https://content.wisconsinhistory.org/digital/collection/wch/id/70736. Northwest Publishing Company. Plat Book of Washington County, Minnesota. Minneapolis, MN: Northwest Publishing Company, 1901. https://collection.mndigital.org/catalog/spl:2062#/image/0. Oberly, James W. “Military Bounty Land Warrants in the United States, 1847-1900.” February 17, 1992, ICPSR, https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09514.v1. Probate Case File No. 4358-4395. 1916 – 1917. Accessed via Ancestry.com. 14 R. L. Polk & Co. Polk’s South St. Paul and West St. Paul City Directory. St. Paul, MN: R. L. Polk & Co., 1972. Rockford Map Publishers. “Village of Cottage Grove.” 1969. On file at the John R. Borchert Map Library, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. ---. “Village of Cottage Grove.” “Village of Cottage Grove.” 1973. On file at the John R. Borchert Map Library, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. ---. “Village of Cottage Grove.” 1976. On file at the John R. Borchert Map Library, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. ---. “East Part of the Village of Cottage Grove.” 1982. On file at the John R. Borchert Map Library, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. ---. “East Part of the Village of Cottage Grove.” 1986. On file at the John R. Borchert Map Library, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. Rosenfelt, Willard E. Washington: A History of the Minnesota County. Stillwater, MN: Croixside Press, 1977. Schmidt, Andrew J., Daniel Pratt, Andrea Vermeer, and Betsy Bradley. Railroads in Minnesota, 1862 – 1956. Multiple Property Documentation Form, 2013. United States Bureau of the Census. Eighth Census of the United States, 1860. Accessed via Ancestry.com. ---. Tenth Census of the United States, 1880. Accessed via Ancestry.com. ---. Thirteenth Census of the United States, 1910. Accessed via Ancestry.com. ---. Fourteenth Census of the United States, 1920. Accessed via Ancestry.com U.S. Marriages Index, 1849-1950. Ancestry.com. The Farmer. The Farmer’s Atlas and Directory of Washington County, Minnesota. St. Paul, MN: Webb Publishing Company, 1912. https://collection.mndigital.org/catalog/p15160coll6:161#/image/0. Thomas Nelson Company. Atlas of Washington County, Minnesota. 1956. https://www.co.washington.mn.us/DocumentCenter/View/1912/1956_platbook. Vogel, Robert. A History of Washington County: Gateway to Minnesota History. Stillwater, MN: Washington County Historical Society, 2008. ---. Cottage Grove History: A Palimpset. Prepared for the Advisory Committee on Historic Preservation, City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota, 1997. On file at the Minnesota Historical Society, St. Paul, Minnesota. 15 ---. “Historic Houses of Cottage Grove: A Field Guide.” Perspectives in Cottage Grove History, no. 1 (February 1986). On file at the Minnesota Historical Society, St. Paul, Minnesota. ---. “Minnesota Historic Properties Inventory Form.” WA-CGC-034. 1984. On file at the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office, St. Paul, Minnesota ---. Preliminary Inventory of Pre-1940 Houses in the City of Cottage Grove. Prepared for the City of Cottage Grove Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission and the Advisory Committee on Historic Preservation, September 1988. On file at the Park Grove Library, Cottage Grove, Minnesota. ---. The New England of the West: A Survey of Historic Properties Associated with Early American Settlement in Cottage Grove. Prepared for the City of Cottage Grove, September 1990. On file at the Park Grove Library, Cottage Grove, Minnesota. Warner and Foote. Map of Ramsey and Washington Counties: with Adjacent Portions of Anoka, Dakota & Hennepin counties, Minnesota, and Parts of St. Croix & Pierce Counties, Minnesota. Minneapolis, MN: Warner and Foote, 1886. https://collection.mndigital.org/catalog/spl:2062. Washington County Property Records and Taxpayer Services, Stillwater, MN. Zellie, Carole. Washington County Historic Contexts. Prepared for Washington County Land Management, 1999. On file at the Park Grove Library, Cottage Grove, Minnesota. 16 BQQFOEJY!B;!DVSSFOU!QIPUPT! 17 House at 10301 Grey Cloud Trail. West elevation, looking east. November 2021. Courtesy of the City of Cottage Grove. 18 House at 10301 Grey Cloud Trail. West elevation, looking northeast. November 2021. Courtesy of the City of Cottage Grove. 19 House at 10301 Grey Cloud Trail. Southelevation, looking northeast. November 2021. Courtesy of the City of Cottage Grove. House at 10301 Grey Cloud Trail. East elevation, looking northwest. November 2021. Courtesy of the City of Cottage Grove. 20 House at 10301 Grey Cloud Trail. North elevation, looking southeast. November 2021. Courtesy of the City of Cottage Grove. Barn at 10301 Grey Cloud Trail. November 2021. Courtesy of the City of Cottage Grove. 21 FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Cottage Grove Washington County, MN February 2022 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. ADMINISTRATIVE BACKGROUND.. II. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS..3 a. . b. .7 c. Public Hearing Testimony, Comments and Respons.53 III. FINDINGS OF FACT...........58 a. Project Description..58 b. Corrections to the EAW.58 IV. DECISION REGARDING NEED FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT.....59 a. Type, Extent, and Reversibility of Impacts..59 b. Cumulative Potential Effects of Related or Anticipated Future Projects....59 c. Extent to which the Environmental Effects are Subject to Mitigation by Ongoing Public Regulatory Authority..59 d. Extent to which Environmental Effects can be Anticipated and Controlled as a Result of Other Environmental Studies .60 V. ..62 ATTACHMENT 1. COMMENTS RECEIVED ATTACHMENT 2. IMPAIRED WATERS MAP ATTACHMENT 3. REVISED TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY ATTACHMENT 4: NEW HISTORY REPORT ON WILLIAM COWAN/HERB FRITZ HOUSE FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 2 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS, FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECORD OF DECISION FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSEMENT WORKSHEET COTTAGE GROVE WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA I. ADMINISTRATIVE BACKGROUND The City of Cottage Grove is the Responsible Governmental Unit for this project, and PulteGroup is the Project Proposer. An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) has been prepared for this project in accordance with Minnesota Rules Chapter 4410. The EAW was developed to assess the potential impacts of the project and other circumstances to determine if an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is needed. The EAW was filed with the Minnesota EQB and circulated for review and comments to the required EAW November 30, 2021. A Notice of Availability and Press Release were published in the Saint Paul Pioneer Press and on the City of Cottage Grove website. These notices provided a brief description of the project and information on where copies of the EAW were available and invited the public to provide comments that would be used in determining the need for an EIS for the Proposed Project. The EAW was made available for public review at Cottage Grove City Hall, the City of Cottage Grove website, and the Conservation Library at 300 Nicollet Mall in Minneapolis. In addition, the City held an optional public hearing for the EAW on December 20, 2021. All comments received during the EAW comment period were considered in determining the potential for significant environmental impacts. Comments received during the Comment Period can be found in Attachment 1 of this document. II. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS The public review period for the Former Mississippi Dunes Golf Course Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) began on November 30, 2021 and was closed on January 6, 2022. The following responses were prepared to address questions and comments received during the public review period. The following agencies provided comment letters, organized alphabetically: Friends of Minnesota Scientific & Natural Areas Friends of the Mississippi River Metropolitan Council Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR) Minnesota Office of the State Archeologist (OSA) Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 3 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 National Park Service Washington Conservation District Washington County The following citizens, resident and private business provided comment emails and letters, organized alphabetically: Biron, Tyler (citizen) Dobozenski, David (citizen) Grams, Adam (citizen) Krauss, Oriana Rueda (citizen) Monjeau-Marz, Corinne L. (citizen) Matter, Bonnie (citizen) Boyle, Sharon (citizen) Schwartz, Barb (citizen) Schwen, Bill (citizen) Smith, Christopher (citizen) Tiefenbruck, Grant (citizen) Williams, Cole (citizen) Whaley, Brett (citizen) Zimmer Environmental Improvement (private business) A copy of each email/letter is included within Attachment 1. Consistent with state environmental rules, responses have been prepared below for all substantive comments received during the comment period. The following citizen and resident comments were provided at the Public Hearing held December 20, 2021, organized alphabetically: Matter, Bonnie (citizen) Boyle, Sharon (citizen) FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 4 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 AGENCY COMMENTS AND RESPONSES 1. FRIENDS OF MINNESOTA SCIENTIFIC & NATURAL AREAS Comment: inconsistency between the text and Figure #5 Concept Sketch Plan. The text includes a plan to sell ~12 acres of land adjacent to the Grey Cloud SNA to the DNR in accordance master plan (Figure #4). However, the Concept Plan Sketch of Pulte Homes (Figure #5) shows the lots for detached homes placed Response: The Project Proposer has entered a purchase agreement with the current property owner and has not closed on the subject property. As part of the due diligence process and negotiations, the Project Proposer is working with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources who has indicated that they would like to purchase approximately 12-acres of the most ecologically significant area adjacent to the Scientific Natural Area. A purchase agreement between the Project Proposer and MnDNR has not been executed and therefore the area is not shown on the Concept Plan. The Concept Plan represents the maximum development scenario if an agreement cannot be reached with the MnDNR or if the MnDNR does not close on the subject 12-acres. 2. FRIENDS OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER Comment: Item 10: Geology, Soils, and Topography/Land Forms and Item 11: Water Resources towards the river. Slope stability, water volume through the site, and impacts to neighboring sites from this water moveme project impacts to water resources. Mitigation should include a plan to incorporate stormwater treatment areas throughout the project area to treat water as closely to its source as possible, reducing the risk of harm from subsurface water movement. It will not be very feasible to pipe stormwater from one end of the site over to the other, so the project should not direct all stormwater to just one to two treatment Response: Comment noted. The Project Proposer will be required to manage surface and stormwater on-site in compliance with the requirements and standards of the City and the Watershed District. Extensive stormwater and surface water modeling is a requirement of the Land Use Application process, and such modeling must include appropriate mitigative design components that demonstrate compliance with the requirements and standards (as shown on Table 6 Required Permits and Status). The use of Minimal Impact Design Standards as well as evaluation of decentralized ponding were evaluated as part of the engineering site design process. Regardless the of the final design, the Project Proposer must comply adopted standards that require all stormwater and surface water to be managed to comply FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 5 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 with both quantity and quality standards as detailed in Item #11(b)(ii) of the EAW. The engineering design of the surface water and stormwater management systems include ponding, pipes and vegetative buffers that all contribute to the overall function of the system. Comment: Item 11: Water Resources and road salting in and around the project area, all chloride runoff should be captured on site. The project should also include a salt management plan to limit use of road salt on both public roadways and Response: Comment noted. New potential sources of chloride associated with the development include the roadways, driveways, and sidewalks during winter months where snow and ice removal are necessary. management of community sidewalks or common areas managed by the HOA. The MnDNR suggests review of the factsheet prepared by the University of Minnesota that identifies ways for homeowners to 1 optimize their water softener salt use. However, any water softener releases are directed into the sanitary sewer system and treated at an off site regional wastewater treatment site. The City will also consider and review the information provided about how other communities are addressing high chloride 2 levels. The City will consider ways to make the factsheet and other educational resources provided by the DNR available to homeowners. The Project Proposer will prepare a salt management plan for the maintenance and management of private driveways and sidewalk that will be incorporated into the homeowner covenants which will incorporate the factsheets by reference. The City has a chloride management system that is intended to carefully manage the use of salt on local roadways. All City plow trucks are equipped with a computerized system, Cirus Spread Smart, that has The system utilizes road temperature, classification of roadway, and type of salt to place pre-determined amounts of salt on the roadway. Each truck is linked to a computer at Public Works that uploads salt usage to allow for detailed tracking for each storm event. This system will be calibrated to the Project area and will consider the proximity of the roadways to the Mississippi River. Comment: Item 13: Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) compliance with the federal Endangered Species Act. The EAW should also include stronger analysis of rusty- documented to be present at the Mississippi Dunes site (not simply in the vicinity). Public Bird records e birds are known to be Њ The factsheet can be accessed at https://www.wrc.umn.edu/sites/wrc.umn.edu/files/umnresidentialbmps_final.pdf 2 Resource can be access at https://www.wrc.umn.edu/communitywatershed-scale FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 6 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 - ore mitigation strategies to protect these \[bird\] species. Additional mitigation arranging the site plan to enable as much contiguous habitat as possible, and employing an ecologist to tices must be fully compliant with the City Response: Comment noted. As stated in Item 13.d. of the EAW, the Project Proposer must work with a qualified ecologist to develop a survey plan that is acceptable to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. The developed survey plan will be tailored to the existing site conditions and an acceptable development and construction plan, including appropriate mitigative strategies, will be developed to the satisfaction of the MnDNR. The Project Proposer will be required to follow the agreed to survey plan and site development and construction plan devel MRCCA ordinance. Comment: Item 13: Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) n visitorship at the neighboring SNA due to the addition of hundreds of residents next to the SNA. An increase in off-trail species. Mitigation could include design elements (such as the platting home lots, adding trail Response: Comment noted. The MnDNR is the owner of the SNA and is aware of the Proposed Project. The SNA is planning to purchase property from the Project Proposer to expand the SNA. The Project Proposer does not have authority to regulate the use or implement any mitigation regarding number of visitors to the SNA. Comment: Item 14: Historic Properties correspondence with the State Historic Preservation Office, the majority of archaeological sites in the state have not been recorded. A lack of documented resources on the project FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 7 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 Response: Comment noted. The subject property was highly disturbed, including mass grading, to develop the golf course in 1995. Given the disturbed nature of the site the City does not believe a Phase I Archaeological reconnaissance study is warranted in the disturbed areas. The City will require the Project Proposer to include a reference within the construction contingency plan regarding proper steps the contractor must take if anything is found on-site once site work commences. On Figure 5 of the EAW the area that is planned as open space, natural area, and park adjacent to the Mississippi River is the area that may not have experienced significant alterations during the golf course construction. A Phase I Archaeological Survey will be completed within any development areas that have not previously been disturbed. Comment: Item 15: Visual City River Corridor View from Hazen P. Mooers Park will be affected by this project. Mississippi Dunes is clearly visible in the photo of this view included in the City View from the Grey Cloud ing view as possible, prioritizing vegetative screening and minimizing the visibility of new structures. Per the DNR, strategies to mitigate visual impacts can include: o Using building materials that blend in with natural surroundings, such as green or brown materials o Placing the long axis of structures perpendicular to the river o Reducing the bulk of structures, such as by using flat roofs or reduced roof pitches o Response: Comment noted. No scenic views or vistas are identified on the Proposed Project site as identified on Figure 10 Location of Public River Corridor Views, MRCCA Plan Chapter 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Development of the Project will protect the entire riverway frontage as open space, park and natural area. Views from the river to the Proposed Project site will be limited given the proposed open space and natural area use on the river frontage that extends a minimum of 300-feet from the OHWL which is consistent with the mitigative strategy identified in the comment letter 3. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Comment: f review finds that the EAW is complete and accurate with respect to regional concerns and raises no major issues of consistency with Council policies. An EIS is not necessary for regional FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 8 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 Response: Comment noted. 4. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (MnDNR) Comment: Item 6: Project Description can proceed. Species-specific work exclusion dates and survey timeframes will affect the timing of Response: Comment noted. As noted in Item 13.d. of the EAW the Project Proposer will work with a qualified ecologist to develop a survey plan that is acceptable to the MnDNR. Comment: Item 6: Permits and Approvals Required Table six should also note that a DNR Takings Permit may be necessary if state-listed threatened and obtain a DNR Water Appropriation Permit should there be a need for construction dewatering of water (either surface Response: Comment noted. The Table has been updated to identify the DNR Takings Permit and DNR Water Appropriation Permit that must be obtained if necessary. Comment: Item 9: Land Use Mississip requirements of the Mississippi River Critical the Mississippi River and the unique ecosystem of the area. Please include the SNA in trail planning in order to ensure that trail locations meet the management needs of all parties and that encroachment FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 9 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 Response: Comment noted. As noted in Item 9, the Proposed Project is located entirely within the MRCCA overlay district, and the proposed development area is generally within the Separated from River (CA-SR) sub- district. Given the Proposed Project location within the MRCCA overlay, the Project is subject to the ance with the ordinance will be completed with the Land Use Application process as required and shown on Table 6. Comment: Item 10: Geology, Soils and Topography/Land Forms feature development. This was confirmed by project borings that encountered soft limestone bedrock near the surface. Great care should be taken to avoid releasing any pollutants in this area that could quickly reach groundwater. We appreciate that care will be used in locating stormwater features. We recommend that site grading also avoids exposing karst- Response: Comment noted. The Project Proposer will develop a grading plan that avoids exposing karst-prone bedrock. The City, and the Project Proposer, understand that karst conditions may occur in areas with underlying limestone which includes the Project site. Limestone underlies much of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, including in the City of Cottage Grove. The City is not aware of any known sinkholes or similar occurrences within the City but understands that adequate due diligence on the site is critical to ensure that the final design and engineering of the Project is responsive to the site-specific geological conditions. As indicated in EAW item 10, a Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation Report was prepared by the Project Proposer and based on the outcomes of that report additional analysis and study of the site is planned by the Project Proposer. The Project Proposer will work with the City to determine the most appropriate mitigation and site design through the permit and approval process. Such mitigative strategies, may include, but are not limited to following the guidelines outlined in the Minnesota Pollution Comment: Item 11: Water Resources Response: Comment noted. Comment: Item 11: Water Resources ount of road salt used in the project area. Chloride released into local lakes and streams does not break down, and instead accumulates in the environment, potentially reaching levels that are toxic to aquatic wildlife and plants. Consider promoting local business and City participation in the Smart Salting Training offered through FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 10 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 Response: Comment noted. The City will consider participation in the Smart Salting Training offered through the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. The City will also review the sample ordinance provided by MnDNR regarding chloride use. salt as part of its management of community sidewalks or common areas managed by the HOA. As previously noted, the City has a chloride management system that is intended to carefully manage the use of salt on local roadways. All City plow trucks are equipped with a computerized system, Cirus Spread Smart, that has se The system utilizes road temperature, classification of roadway, and type of salt to place pre-determined amounts of salt on the roadway. Each truck is linked to a computer at Public Works that uploads salt usage to allow for detailed tracking for each storm event. This system will be calibrated to the Project area and will consider the proximity of the roadways to the Mississippi River. Comment: Item 11: Water Resources Response: Comment noted. The Project Proposer will explore the feasibility of using stormwater for irrigation of landscape on the Proposed Project site post-development. Comment: Item 11: Water resources We recommend using BWSR-approved, native seed mixes for seeding stormwater features, project landscaping, and soil stabilization. Due to the proximity to the SNA, please make sure that all seed Response: As stated in Item 13(d) the Project Proposer will seed all stormwater management areas using the BWSR or MnDOT native seed mixes and will be free of noxious weeds and invasive species. Comment: Item 11: Water Resources lopment should not be directed towards or allowed to pool on the current or Response: All stormwater and surface water management must be managed on the Proposed Project site to comply with the City and South Washington Watershed District rules. Stormwater will not be directed or allowed to pool on the current or any future land owned by the SNA. Comment: Item 13: Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 11 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 agricultural and golf course uses of parts of the project area, but fails to identify that the area planned for development is mapped as a Minnesota Biological Survey (MBS) Site of High Biodiversity Significance as well as a DNR Native Plant Community (NPC). Despite the previous uses and disturbance, sections of the project area within the golf course were left intact and may yet contain rare plants and valuable wildlife habitat. -patched bumble bee, Leon fritillary and the Monarch butterfly by completing the vegetation disturbance early in the 2022 season. Due to the potential need for plant surveys during the growing season, these mitigation measures are unrealistic. Permanently converting even degraded grassland to impervious surfaces will remove habitat within the project area and should be considered a long-term impact. Because the Rusty- patched bumble bee is a federally-listed as endangered, please coordinate with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service regarding mitigation for long- that tree/shrub removal is prohibited from April through August 15th to avoid impacting endangered bird species that have been documented in the direct vicinity of the project. Please coordinate with DNR if this is not feasible as bird surveys may Response: Comment noted. As identified in Item 13(d), and in response to the MnDNR NHIS correspondence letter dated November 19, 2021, the Project Proposer has hired a qualified ecologist to work with the MnDNR to develop a site survey process that will comply with the requirements of the MnDNR Land Use Fish and Wildlife Service. The Project Proposer intends to work with the MnDNR to establish a reasonable process for survey and eventual site development and construction. Appropriate permits, including any required DNR Takings Permits will be obtained. Comment: Item 16: Air Response: Comment noted. Appropriate Permits will be obtained as previously noted. The Project Proposer will not use products that contain chloride for dust control during the site development and construction process. Comment: Item 18: Transportation FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 12 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 Response: The Project Proposer is working with the BNSF Railway to obtain proper permits for crossing of the railroad right of way. All appropriate permits will be obtained as part of the site development process. 5. MINNESOTA OFFICE OF THE STATE ARCHEOLOGIST Comment: Item 14: Historic Properties there are no previously recorded archaeological sites, archaeological site leads, or burials within the proposed project area. However, the project is situated with a district replete with archaeological and cemetery sites and is adjacent to the Mississippi River. Therefor a phase I archaeological reconnaissance conducted by a qualified archaeologist is recommended Response: Comment noted. The subject property was highly disturbed, including mass grading, to develop the golf course in 1995. Given the disturbed nature of the site the City does not believe a Phase I Archaeological reconnaissance study is warranted in the disturbed areas. The City will require the Project Proposer to include a reference within the construction contingency plan regarding proper steps the contractor must take if anything is found on-site once site work commences. On Figure 5 of the EAW the area that is planned as open space, natural area, and park adjacent to the Mississippi River is the area that may not have experienced significant alterations during the golf course construction. A Phase I Archaeological Survey will be completed within any development areas that have not previously been disturbed. 6. MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY (MPCA) Comment: Item 7: Cover Types accurately. For example, under open space, zero acres are listed. It would seem that a golf course would Response: The land cover types were obtained from the Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS) shapefile prepared by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR). The City acknowledges that open space or natural areas may exist within the footprint of the former golf course; however, the MnDNR prepared portions of the MLCCS using aerial analysis that identified the manicured golf course (impervious surface) as the dominant land cover. The EAW Guidelines provided by the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB) establish the MLCCS as an appropriate publicly available data set to prepare the response to EAW Item 7. The MLCCS classified the subject site as predominantly 5-10% impervious which correlates to the landscape/lawn coverage associated with the golf course. FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 13 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 Comment: Item 8: Permits and Approvals Required Response: Table 6: Required Permits and Status has been updated to include the Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit, to be obtained if necessary. Comment: Item 11: Water Resources mentions the additional work and utilities that must be extended to serve the Project, but there are no details about that work in the EAW. There was a mandatory EAW completed for the Cottage Grove South District Trunk Sewer earlier this year. If that sewer needs to be extended again for this Project, a separate mandatory EAW may be required. This related work, and whether a mandatory EAW Response: The Subject Project does not require the extension of the Cottage Grove South District Trunk Sewer. Any future extension of the South District Sanitary Sewer past the Phase 1 completed in 2021 would be Comment: Item 11: Water Resources -acre site and will discharge stormwater to the Mississippi River, which has construction-related impairments. Because the Project will disturb 50 or more acres, the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will need to be submitted for review and approval by MPCA prior to obtaining National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System/State Disposal System (NPDES/SDS) Construction Stormwater Permit (CSW Permit) coverage Response: Comment noted. Table 6 in the EAW identifies that a SWPPP is required. Comment: Item 11: Water Resources also mentions use of infiltration basins for volume control unless not feasible and that the City allows the ability to use off site mitigation credits to meet volume control requirements if onsite Best Management Practices (BMPs) are not possible. The EAW does mention the presence of hydric soils and karst features at the site that may prohibit infiltration but also discusses use of filtration and bio filtration areas for meeting volume control requirements. However, filtration may not be considered to be a method of bioinfiltration and use of green infrastructure practices to reduce stormwater runoff and provide climate FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 14 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 resilience to increasing rainfall. Consider also reducing pervious surfaces contributing to runoff by constructing narrower streets or using pervious pavements. Pervious pavements would also help to Response: Comments noted. The City, and the Project Proposer, understand that karst conditions may occur in areas with underlying limestone which includes the Project site. Limestone underlies much of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, including in the City of Cottage Grove. The City is not aware of any known sinkholes or similar occurrences within the City but understands that adequate due diligence on the site is critical to ensure that the final design and engineering of the Project is responsive to the site-specific geological conditions. As indicated in EAW item 10, a Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation Report was prepared by the Project Proposer and based on the outcomes of that report additional analysis and study of the site is planned by the Project Proposer. The Project Proposer will work with the City to determine the most appropriate mitigation and site design through the permit and approval process. The Project Proposer will implement BMPs in its site development activities and will explore opportunities to use pervious pavements and other best practices in the development post construction. The plan for stormwater management will be developed to address and consider the recommendations as noted, and will refer to the 3 Manual. Comment: Item 12: Contamination/Hazardous Materials/Wastes contamination from multiple sources. Furthermore, these are located in areas where the groundwater is highly vulnerable to contamination from the surface because there is relatively little overlying fine-grained Response: Comment noted. The City and Project Proposer understand that this area is in a sensitive area known to have extensive groundwater contamination. All structures must be served by municipal water services to ensure a safe water supply. Further, mitigative measures must be incorporated into the site development process to ensure that post-development conditions do not further exacerbate or contribute further to the known groundwater contamination. The Project Proposer will coordinate with the MPCA on safe handling and disposal of any contamination and hazardous materials found on the site prior and during construction. Comment: Item 12: Contamination/Hazardous Materials/Wastes Ќ https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Main_Page FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 15 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 on of heavy equipment in and near lakes, streams and wetlands obligates the project proposers to develop a plan for managing fuels and lubricants, including a plan of action to implement in the event of spills. The Project proposer and their contractors should be prepared to respond to spills Response: Comment noted. The Project Proposer will develop a construction contingency plan for development of the Proposed Project site. The Construction Contingency Plan must include and address the action to be taken if areas of significant contamination are identified, as well as include a plan for the management of fuels and lubricants and plan of action to implement in the event of spills. The Project Proposer will coordinate with the MPCA on safe handling and disposal of any contamination and hazardous materials found on the site prior and during construction. 7. MINNESOTA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE Comment: Item 14: Historic Properties Response: Comment noted. The subject property was highly disturbed, including mass grading, to develop the golf course in 1995. Given the disturbed nature of the site the City does not believe a Phase I Archaeological reconnaissance study is warranted in the disturbed areas. The City will require the Project Proposer to include a reference within the construction contingency plan regarding proper steps the contractor must take if anything is found on-site once site work commences. On Figure 5 of the EAW the area that is planned as open space, natural area, and park adjacent to the Mississippi River is the area that may not have experienced significant alterations during the golf course construction. A Phase I Archaeological Survey will be completed within any development areas that have not previously been disturbed. 8. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Comment: Item 7: Cover Types before the development. This is misleading as the majority of the 164 acres has become more natural would be better than demolishing this established habitat. This is especially true on the western side of the development where dry tall grasses and forests tie into the Grey Cloud Dunes Scientific and Natural FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 16 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 Response: The land cover types were obtained from the Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS) shapefile prepared by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR). The City acknowledges that open space or natural areas may exist within the footprint of the former golf course; however, the MnDNR prepared portions of the MLCCS using aerial analysis that identified the manicured golf course (impervious surface) as the dominant land cover. The EAW Guidelines provided by the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB) establish the MLCCS as an appropriate publicly available data set to prepare the response to EAW Item 7. The MLCCS classified the subject site as predominantly 5-10% impervious which correlates to the landscape/lawn coverage associated with the golf course. The Golf Course use is the most recent use and study of the land for development has been underway since the golf course was shuttered prior to the 2018 season. As stated in Item 6(c) of the EAW, the Project Proposer is working with the MnDNR on the purchase of approximately 12 acres of land on the eastern side of the Project area where the most significant natural areas abut the Grey Cloud Dunes Scientific Natural Area (SNA). Comment: Item 11: Water Resources he Mississippi River, and the Mississippi Dunes site, are also part of the Mississippi National River and Recreation Area (NRRA). Congress established the Mississippi NRRA in 1988 to preserve, protect, and enhance the significant values of the Mississippi River Corridor in the Twin Cities metropolitan area. The Mississippi NRRA shares a boundary with the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA), and we appreciate that the proposed development will adhere to updated MRCCA ordinances being adopted by the City of Cottage Grove. The national significance of this stretch of the Mississippi River and its resources should be Response: Comment noted. The Proposed Project Site is within the Mississippi National River and Recreation Area (NRRA), and the NRRA boundary is consistent with the MRCCA boundary. The NRRA is a federal designation that is further supported by the MRCCA. The NRRA has designated this area as an area of critical concern and seeks to protect the Mississippi River. The City adopted the MRCCA ordinance in December 2021 which is consistent with, and supports, the requirements of both the NRRA and MnDNR. The Proposed Project will be required to comply with the MRCCA ordinance. Comment: Item 13: Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) ince there has been no active management at the site. Disturbance of the natural spaces and addition of a housing development will likely increase this level of activity from present use. Buffers around sensitive areas should be implemented to prevent conflicting uses from the development and should be encouraged FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 17 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 wherever possible. Drift and runoff from chemicals and fertilizers from lawn care could impact habitat on Response: Comment noted. The use of the site through 2017 was for a golf course, and the majority of the Proposed Project site was heavily landscaped and manicured. The golf course included the heavy use of pesticides and herbicides that often affects the land for several years after application. The continued use of the site as a golf course would have resulted in the continued heavy use of pesticides and herbicides. After the closure of the golf course it was assumed that the use of the site would transition to either housing or some other development type that would not include heavy use of herbicides and pesticides. As indicated in previous responses, the Project Proposer is working with the MnDNR to sell approximately 12 acres of land adjacent to the SNA to further protect and enhance the SNA. Additionally, the entire river frontage will be protected as open space, park land and natural area as shown on Figure 5: Concept Plan of the EAW. The land adjacent to the Mississippi River as well as the potential expansion of the SNA will provide a buffer between the proposed development and these sensitive natural areas. Comment: Item 13: Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) human use like erosion from increased foot traffic in natural areas and wildlife harassment from pets and humans. While the SNA is open to the public, it is not a public park that is designed to handle significant human activity, especially given the sensitive habitats located at Grey Cloud Dunes SNA. Housing placed on the boundary will likely increase Response: Comment noted. The Project Proposer will be cognizant of the distinction that the SNA is not a public park. No paved trails or other direct connections between the housing and/or lots will be provided from the Proposed Project development to the SNA. Comment: Item 13: Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) Review from the MN Department of Natural Resources in Appendix B. There are several rare species found within the search area for the Mississippi Dunes site. A qualified surveyor should conduct a habitat Response: Comment noted. The Project Proposer will follow the recommendations as stated in the NHIS Review contained in Appendix B of the EAW. In compliance with the recommendations, Item 13(d) clearly states that the Project Proposer will hire a qualified ecologist to develop a Survey Plan for the site to conduct the habitat assessment. FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 18 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 Comment: Item 15: Visual There are two Public River Corridor Views (PRCV) within the immediate area of the Mississippi Dunes site. One is located at Hazen P. Mooers Park that overlooks the southern portion of the Mississippi Dunes site and the north east portion of Grey Cloud Island. Set back of the development will decrease the impacts to this PRCV. The other PRCV is from the Grey Cloud Dunes SNA. While there are no overlooks or established trails in the SNA, the elevated and open bluffs of the SNA provide striking views of the natural areas around the SNA. Removal of vegetation for the development will impact the natural views from the SNA. Maintaining existing vegetation and the addition of vegetation within the housing Response: Comment noted. No scenic views or vistas are identified on the Proposed Project site as illustrated on Figure 10 Location of Public River Corridor Views, MRCCA Plan C 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Development of the Proposed Project will protect the entire riverway frontage as open space, park and natural area. The Project Proposer is working with the MnDNR on the purchase of approximately 12 acres that will further extend the SNA along the eastern boundary of the site. Vegetation within this area will be protected and maintained. 9. WASHINGTON CONSERVATION DISTRICT Comment: Item 6: Project Description resolution, does not include a legend or key to features, and does not appear to include the 12-acre addition to Grey Cloud Dunes SNA. Please provide a revised Concept Sketch Plan for interpretability Response: Comment noted. Figure 5 Concept Plan appears legible in the package reviewed. A separate figure has an does not identify the approximately 12-acres of land to be purchased by the MnDNR because a formal purchase agreement has not been executed. The Concept Plan represents the maximum development scenario if an agreement cannot be reached with the MnDNR. Comment: Item 7: Cover Types -native cover types, correspondence with the Minnesota DNR located in Appendix B notes the possibility of existing and intact native plant communities in isolated areas. Further survey work is needed to identify areas FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 19 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 Response: Comment noted. As stated in Item 13.d. of the EAW, the Project Proposer must work with a qualified ecologist to develop a survey plan that is acceptable to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Comment: Item 9: Land Use space within the project area to protect and enhance the scenic, ecological, cultural, and recreational value of the corridor. The Project Proposer should describe the steps that will be taken to protect Priority horeline impact zones, significant existing vegetation Response: Comment noted. The Project Proposer is working with the City of Cottage Grove, the MnDNR and other agencies to determine the areas of highest priority and developed the Concept Plan in response to the and shoreline impact zones, setbacks, etc., will be reviewed and evaluated as part of the Land Use Application process. Comment: Item 10: Geology, Soils and Topography/Landforms ons, or karst conditions within the site, though there are several known formations in the area (Figure 14 of the EAW). The Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation Report found near- and near-surface groundwater features at multiple boring locations across the site. More information is needed to evaluate potential impacts to surface and groundwater features in areas that will be Response: Comment noted. The City, and the Project Proposer, understand that karst conditions may occur in areas with underlying limestone which includes the Project site. Limestone underlies much of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, including in the City of Cottage Grove. The City is not aware of any known sinkholes or similar occurrences within the City but understands that adequate due diligence on the site is critical to ensure that the final design and engineering of the Project is responsive to the site-specific geological conditions. As indicated in EAW item 10, a Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation Report was prepared by the Project Proposer and based on the outcomes of that report additional analysis and study of the site is planned by the Project Proposer. The Project Proposer will work with the City to determine the most appropriate mitigation and site design through the permit and approval process. Comment: Item 11: Water Resources oser 303d Impaired Water List, but Moers Lake, Grey Cloud Channel and Grey Cloud Slough are of 3 not listed on the Impaired List which are the waterbodies within 1-of the EAW). The segment of the Mississippi River between Upper St Anthony Falls and the St Croix River is FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 20 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 listed for several impairments, including nutrients and TSS, PFOS, PCBs, and mercury. This segment of the Mississippi River is inclusive of Grey Cloud Channel, Grey Cloud Slough, and Mooers Lake. Discussion of these impairments must therefore be identified and discussed in this section. A 2015 study completed by the Metropolitan Council found high chloride (Cl) concentrations in Pool 2 of the Mississippi River near Grey Cloud Island. The Project Proposer should address new potential sources of chloride associated with development (e.g. road salts or water softener brine) and propose measures for reducing chloride usage and preventing chloride contamination of wetlands and/or Response: Comment noted. The information provided in this comment does not align with the information available on the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Impaired Water List and through the mapping portal. t is the appropriate resource to use for the response to Item 11.a.i. (See Attachment 2). The information shown on the map is consistent with the response prepared in Item 11.a.i., and no impaired waters are located within 1-mile of the boundary. New potential sources of chloride associated with the development include the roadways, driveways, and sidewalks during winter months where snow and ice removal are necessary. The MnDNR suggests review of the factsheet prepared by the University of Minnesota that identifies ways for homeowners to 4 optimize their water softener salt use. However, any water softener releases are directed into the sanitary sewer system and treated at an off site regional wastewater treatment site. The City will also consider and review the information provided about how other communities are addressing high chloride 5 levels. The City will consider ways to make the factsheet and other educational resources provided by the DNR available to homeowners. will not use salt as part of its management of community sidewalks or common areas managed by the HOA. As previously noted, the City has a chloride management system that is intended to carefully manage the use of salt on local roadways. All City plow trucks are equipped with a computerized system, Cirus The system utilizes road temperature, classification of roadway, and type of salt to place pre-determined amounts of salt on the roadway. Each truck is linked to a computer at Public Works that uploads salt usage to allow for detailed tracking for each storm event. This system will be calibrated to the Project area and will consider the proximity of the roadways to the Mississippi River. Additionally, the Proposed Project must obtain the following: South Washington Watershed District (SWWD) rules, including wetland buffer requirements, and the SWWD Watershed Management Plan Ѝ The factsheet can be accessed at https://www.wrc.umn.edu/sites/wrc.umn.edu/files/umnresidentialbmps_final.pdf 5 Resource can be access at https://www.wrc.umn.edu/communitywatershed-scale FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 21 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 Ordinances. Each of these permits includes a list of specific and detailed stormwater quality and quantity requirements that must be complied with as part of the design. Some of the regulations applicable to the Proposed Project are more stringent due to the location and geography of the site. The Project Proposer must meet all of the regulations and obtain all necessary approvals and permits as detailed in Table 6 of the EAW. Comment: Item 13: Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities, and Sensitive Ecological Resources Section 13a- documented within 1-mile of the project area. This section also identifies endangered, threatened, or special concern species documented on site or likely to occur nearby. This list is by no means exhaustive (as noted in Appendix B), and there are many other Species in Greatest Conservation Need that are known to occur in the area, including dickcissel, bobolink, American kestrel, eastern rd reports for Grey Cloud Dunes SNA). Further survey work is needed to assess the presence/absence of sensitive ecological features within the project site and to assess the risks associated with site Response: Comment noted. As stated in Item 13(d) of the EAW, the Project Proposer must work with a qualified ecologist to develop a survey plan that is acceptable to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Comment: Item 14: Historic Properties sites via MNSHPO correspondence located in Appendix B. These sites include the NRHP-listed Schilling Archaeological District (STN: 21WA1) and Michaud-Koukal Mounds (21WA2), Grey Cloud Town Site (21WA48), and the NRHP-listed Grey Cloud Lime Kiln site. Past archeological surveys of the Spring Lake/Grey Cloud Island area have revealed many other historically significant sites along the corridor, some dating as far back as the Early Woodland period (Fleming et al 2018; Anfinson 2003). The Washington Conservation District supports further investigation (with reference to Appendix B of the otential to Response: Comment Noted. The subject property was highly disturbed, including mass grading, to develop the golf course in 1995. Given the disturbed nature of the site the City does not believe a Phase I Archaeological reconnaissance study is warranted in the disturbed areas. The City will require the Project Proposer to include a reference within the construction contingency plan regarding proper steps the contractor must take if anything is found on-site once site work commences. FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 22 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 On Figure 5 of the EAW the area that is planned as open space, natural area, and park adjacent to the Mississippi River is the area that may not have experienced significant alterations during the golf course construction. A Phase I Archaeological Survey will be completed within any development areas that have not previously been disturbed. Comment: Item 15: Visual adjacency to Grey Cloud Dunes SNA and other natural areas. Light pollution has the potential to disrupt nesting and mating patterns for many wildlife species. The Project Proposer should address how the Response: Comment noted. All propo standards. The park, open space and natural area adjacent to the Mississippi River will be publicly owned property and a lighting plan will be developed once uses within the areas are established. 10. WASHINGTON COUNTY Comment: Item 10: Geology, Soils and Topography/Landforms -surface, highly-weathered limestone bedrock (7-18 feet below surface) and near-surface groundwater features (2-19.5 feet below surface) are present at the project site. Although there are no known karst features at the project site, the previously mentioned site features indicate the potential for groundwater impacts and should be considered and monitored closely during project Response: Comment noted. The City, and the Project Proposer, understand that karst conditions may occur in areas with underlying limestone which includes the Project site. Limestone underlies much of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, including in the City of Cottage Grove. The City is not aware of any known sinkholes or similar occurrences within the City but understands that adequate due diligence on the site is critical to ensure that the final design and engineering of the Project is responsive to the site-specific geological conditions. As indicated in EAW item 10, a Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation Report was prepared by the Project Proposer and based on the outcomes of that report additional analysis and study of the site is planned by the Project Proposer. The Project Proposer will work with the City to determine the most appropriate mitigation and site design through the permit and approval process. Comment: Item 11: Water Resources ential chloride (Cl) sources and mitigation measures FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 23 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 Response: Comment noted. New potential sources of chloride associated with the development include the roadways, driveways, and sidewalks during winter months where snow and ice removal are necessary. management of community sidewalks or common areas managed by the HOA. The MnDNR suggests review of the factsheet prepared by the University of Minnesota that identifies ways for homeowners to 6 optimize their water softener salt use. However, any water softener releases are directed into the sanitary sewer system and treated at an off site regional wastewater treatment site. The City will also consider and review the information provided about how other communities are addressing high chloride 7 levels. The City will consider ways to make the factsheet and other educational resources provided by the DNR available to homeowners. As previously noted, the City has a chloride management system that is intended to carefully manage the use of salt on local roadways. All City plow trucks are equipped with a computerized system, Cirus The system utilizes road temperature, classification of roadway, and type of salt to place pre-determined amounts of salt on the roadway. Each truck is linked to a computer at Public Works that uploads salt usage to allow for detailed tracking for each storm event. This system will be calibrated to the Project area and will consider the proximity of the roadways to the Mississippi River. The City will also review the sample ordinance provided by MnDNR regarding chloride use. Comment: Item 11: Water Resources All wells located during project construction shall be sealed according to Minnesota Department of possibly others. All septic systems, tanks, or components on the property must be identified and properly abandoned. A county permit for septic system abandonment is required and a Minnesota Pollution Control Agency abandonment form must be submitted to the Washington County Department of Public Response: Comment noted. Any wells found that have not been sealed, will be sealed according to the Minnesota Department of Health regulations. All septic systems, tanks, and components will be properly abandoned. Table 6 is corrected to reflect that the permit must be obtained. Comment: Item 12: Contamination/Hazardous Materials/Wastes Џ The factsheet can be accessed at https://www.wrc.umn.edu/sites/wrc.umn.edu/files/umnresidentialbmps_final.pdf 7 Resource can be access at https://www.wrc.umn.edu/communitywatershed-scale FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 24 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 d/or remnants of the club house that burned down must be removed from the property, and managed at an Response: Comment noted. Comment: Item 12: Contamination/Hazardous Materials/Wastes Superfund project adjacent to the project site was not identified in the Environmental Assessment Worksheet. According to a data search in the "What's in My Neighborhood" interactive map, property east of the redevelopment site now owned by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources was historically used for disposal of wastes from refinery operations, including solid waste, asphalt and Response: Comment noted. identifies the Ashland Oil-Cottage Grove Site which is identified as an Investigation and Cleanup Site. Comment: Item 12: Contamination/Hazardous Materials/Wastes me aware of high levels of certain heavy metals in golf courses from normal, legal use of certain herbicides and fungicides use. As stated in the EAW, the primary past use of the project area for a golf course included heavy pesticide use to manage the manicured greens and fairways. The potential for contamination should be considered around the boxes, Response: Comment noted. Comment: Item 18: Transportation between Figure 4 and Figure 5 in the way that the north access location ties into the surrounding transportation system. The county prefers the configuration depicted in Figure 4 as we feel it can accommodate an interim access with a realigned Grey Cloud Island Trail, and be the best long-term design for the future arterial route. When considering the location of this access, please note that sight lines are reduced the farther north it is proposed to be located, and it will be imperative to ensure that sight lines Response: Comment noted. The final proposed roadway alignment is reflected in Figure 4 in the EAW. Comment: Item 18: Transportation FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 25 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 proposed for, and would be interested in any opportunity to access that area for drainage when the future county arterial is built. Alternatively, given the scope of change in drainage patterns associated with the proposed project, Washington County would like to partner on a regional drainage opportunity to accommodate the increased runoff that will be generated by the future county arterial and the proposed Response: Comment noted. Comment: Item 18: Transportation appreciates the role that the connections between the Mississippi River Trail Bikeway, Central Greenway, and Community Trails will play in establishing those connections, as well as the City Code requirement for eight-foot-wide pedestrian trails on streets with blocks longer than 900-feet. With bicycle and pedestrian facilities proposed for the future arterial route, the county will be interested in an opportunity to review and provide comment on the Concept Plan once it is updated to meet this standard to ensure that adequate, non- Response: Comment noted. The City will coordinate with Washington County during the Land Use Application process to review the preliminary plat including the proposed trail system throughout the Project. Comment: Item 18: Transportation -of-way to be dedicated with the project. The county is satisfied with that amount of right-of-way and expects it to be Response: Comment noted. FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 26 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 CITIZEN COMMENTS AND RESPONSES 11. BIRON, TYLER (CITIZEN) Comment: Item 9: Land Use townhomes?...proposed on 103rd st s. It would be directly across the road from our property. If we have to accept this development and all the people, noise, lights, etc that are going to come with it could you at least not allow this in the development plan a give my family and a buffer? Response: Comment noted. The Proposed Project has not been approved and is subject to the City of Cottage Application process as identified in Table 6. A public hearing will be held to review the Proposed Project and public testimony will be considered in the approval process. 12. DOBOZENSKI, DAVID (CITIZEN) Comment: Item 20: Other Potential Environmental Effects Response: The development area of the Potential Project site will be mass graded to install both public and private improvements. Public improvements will include the installation of roadways and water and sewer lines. Areas not within the development area, including some of the open space and natural area along the southern property line as shown in Figure 5 will largely retain the existing vegetation. Comment: Item 11: Water resources Response: The City is aware that some existing wells in the area have been contaminated by regional chemical discharges. As part of the Proposed Project, an uncontaminated City potable water main will be brought to the area to serve the new homes. In the future, if desired by neighbors, the potential exists to connect to City water. The Proposed Project is not anticipated to cause or affect the existing wells in the area and appropriate mitigation efforts will be implement regarding chloride and storm water runoff. Due to the proximity of the Project site to the Mississippi River, the storm water quality/quantity rules for this project are more stringent than standard stormwater rules. Comment: Item 11: Water Resources FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 27 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 Per your map the storm water is run into the freshwater spring creek that runs from the railroad track on the east to the river on the west. The creek was dam to make the ponds. Did the DNR & So. Washington Response: As indicated on Table 6 in the EAW, the Project Proposer must submit a full stormwater management and erosion control plan for review and approval by the City of Cottage Grove and the South Washington Watershed District (SWWD). All appropriate permits must be obtained prior to the commencement of site work. Comment: Item 18: Transportation rd Street, who will pay for it. We just paid to have Grey Cloud Response: The Project Proposer is working with the City of Cottage Grove and Washington County on the realignment of Grey Cloud Trail through the northwest corner of the site. The realignment shown on Figure 5. Concept Plan through the Project site will be paid for, and is the responsibility of, the Project Proposer. 13. GRAMS, ADAM (CITIZEN) Comment: Item 6: Project Description is yet to be determined. Any improvements to publicly dedicated open space will be at the discretion of the governmental organization with ownership of the area and such potential future improvements are This statement seems ambiguous. If the area is part of the project area, Response: Comment noted. Figure 5 Concept Sketch Plan is a concept plan and not full engineering plans for the Proposed Project. As noted in Table 6 of the EAW, the Project Proposer must apply for several Land Use Applications including Preliminary and Final Plat that will identify the exact acreages of each uses. The Project Proposer is working with the City of Cottage Grove and the MnDNR to identify the exact location and size of the park, open space and natural area associated with the Project. It is the Project sell land to the City and MnDNR. How the agencies use the land purchased is outside of the control of what the Project Proposer can control. As such, the areas identified as open space, park or natural area are outside the scope of this study. Comment: Item 13: Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 28 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 bumblebee. Response: Construction and development activities will be confined to the Proposed Project site and will not encroach into the adjacent SNA. As stated in Item 13.d. the Project Proposer will hire a qualified ecologist to develop a survey plan for the Proposed Project site that is acceptable to the MnDNR. The survey plan will address the species identified by the US Fish and Wildlife Service, including the Rusty Patch Bumblebee. The site development and construction plan will be informed by the survey plan. Comment: Item 18: Transportation changing locations, has an environmental impact been done to those residents and the enclosed environment surrounding Response: Comment noted. The final access road locations will be established through the Land Use Application process that must be reviewed and approved by the City of Cottage Grove. All proper permits, including access permits, must be obtained prior to the commencement of any site work. Comment: Item 11: Water Resources permittees Wasteload Allocations (WLA) are assigned by TMDL reduction requirements in the table below... In addition to the MS4 requirements below, the Lake Pepin TMDL will also assign a TP load stormwater impacts associated with the NPDES permit or plan to address the increased TP and TSS loading being exported from this project after project completion. The MNLCS states that the current predominant land cover in the project area is currently tall dry grasses, forest, and shrubland landcover, which will most likely be replaced with turfgrass, and impervious surface, which would/could have a Response: The Proposed Project must obtain the following: South Washington Watershed District (SWWD) rules, including wetland buffer requirements, and the SWWD Watershed Management Plan Ordinances. Each of these permits includes a list of specific and detailed stormwater quality and quantity requirements that must be complied with as part of the design. Some of the regulations applicable to the Proposed Project are more stringent due to the location and geography of the site. The Project FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 29 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 Proposer must meet all of the regulations and obtain all necessary approvals and permits as detailed in Table 6 of the EAW. Comment: Item 11: Water Resources -mile of the project boundary, with Moers Lake, Grey Cloud Channel, and Grey Cloud Slough being the only water bodies within 1-mile. While this is technically true when considering the stream line-work distance from the project boundary, these water bodies are hydraulically directly connected to the Mississippi River Main stem, that any impact on these water bodies would be as if having the same impact on the Mississippi River (AUID 07010206- 814, Up Response: Comment noted. The EAW acknowledges the connected nature of the water features adjacent to the Proposed Project site in Item 11. As noted in Item 11.i. given that the surface waters are connected, it states that the SWPPP prepared for the site must include all additional stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) for discharges to impaired waters since the runoff from the Project Area ultimately drains to the Mississippi River which includes segments on the 303d impaired list. Comment: Item 11: Water Resources h the project boundaries are not within and wellhead protection area, or Drinking water supply management areas (DWSMAs), there is a large DWSMA and Wellhead protection area that borders the project directly to the north. What is the EAW report and respons Response: Comment noted. The City will coordinate with the Project Proposer on the extension of the municipal water supply system to the site and will follow any necessary rules and regulations if the system will be impacted by the DWSMA. 14. KRAUSS, ORIANA RUEDA (CITIZEN) Comment: Item 13: Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) should be considered as a delicate resource to help reduce climate change, for the many ecosystem goods and services a healthy ecosystem like that can provide, and for the enjoyment of residents. Only half of the houses proposed should be allowed, or not at all if possible. We need to be consequential and understand that we depend on nature 100%, there is no planet B, and we need to protect nature whenever possible if we are to survive. Even though the area is a former golf course, if left alone to regenerate, these beautiful dunes can easily regain native plants and animals from around the area. The amount of impervious surfaces being increased from 4.4 to 47.8 is excessive, and the amount of wooded, grassland and wetland areas should be left as it is, not decreased as proposed FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 30 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 en for the natural ecosystem to regenerate, reproduce and sustain the amount of plants and animals currently existing in the area. I request much less parking, paved and lawn areas and significantly more (at least 50% of the total area) areas with native plants that Response: Comment noted. The Project Proposer must apply for several Land Use Applications where the specific site details including landscape plan w ordinances and recently approved Master Plan for this property. The Land Use Application process will include review of the number of units, impervious surface coverage, stormwater management and landscape plan. This process will include a public hearing where the City will solicit public testimony regarding the Proposed Project. Comment: Item 13: Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) Response: Comment noted. Comment: Item 18: Transportation highlight that the two small wetland areas that may be impacted depending on the final alignment of the County Road and of the main entrance road into the neighborhood certainly need to meet strict mitigation plans, as they are part of the Mississippi River watershed. If nothing else, at least leave undisturbed the adjacent undeveloped land of approximately 17.8 acres mentioned on the "Infrastructure and Project Area Improvement section". A full site grading is about the worst thing that can be done to an area like this. I request it is only done in areas where it is absolutely Response: Comment noted. The Project Proposer will be required to prepare a wetland replacement and mitigation plan and obtain all appropriate permits from the City and the South Washington Watershed District (SWWD). Comment: Item 13: Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) Master Plan that includes providing diverse, sustainable housing choices and options while providing protection of important natural resources and amenities along the Mississippi River that are consistent with its MRRCA plan and ordinances." where exactly residents around the area. A development of these dimensions would certainly have a negative impact FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 31 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 on the "high-quality vegetation and habitat" found in and around the SNA and the Mississippi river. The area being adjacent to the Mississippi River also highlights the importance of this area as a natural corridor for a wide variety of wildlife. This is part of the reason why this area is so ecologically important and there are a lot of concerned residents and organizations opposing this project. The effects of this project could affect important rare and threatened species such as the Northern Long Eared Bat, the Rusty-patched Bumble Bee, and the Monarch butterfly, which should be aggressively Response: Comment noted. As shown on Figure 5 Concept Sketch Plan a minimum of 25-acres is planned for permanent protection as park, open space or natural resource area. The Project Proposer and the MnDNR are working on an agreement for the sale of an approximately 12-acre piece of land in the southeast corner of the site to expand the SNA and further protect the natural resources in this area of the site. Finally, the Project Proposer will hire a qualified ecologist to prepare a survey of the property that is acceptable to the MnDNR. The process will ensure that the construction and site development activities are completed consistent with the recommendations of the MnDNR. 15. MONJEAU-MARZ, CORINNE L. (CITIZEN) Comment: Item 13: Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) Response: Comment noted. As described in the EAW and as shown on Figure 5 of the EAW, a minimum of 25- acres is planned to be protected as park, open space and natural area. The Project Proposer is working with the MnDNR to add approximately 12-acres of land to the adjacent SNA. 16. MATTER, BONNIE (CITIZEN) Comment: Item 9: Land Use one more both on the north side of the development to serve the needs of 499 residences. This does Response: As shown Figure 5. Concept Sketch Plan in Appendix A of the EAW there are two access road connections into the new development from Grey Cloud Trail South. The road network internal to the Proposed Project site is interconnected to ensure two access locations are provided to residents in the new neighborhoods. Comment: Item 9: Land Use FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 32 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 What is the distance (and what is the required distance) between the railroad tracks and the residences. Are there building standards for residences and railroad tracks? Currently 37 trains per day go through this area! Is there potential for increased rail traffic in the future? What is the Item 16: Air Item 20: Other Potential environment effects Response: Comment noted. As shown on Figure 5 of the EAW the closest lot is setback approximately 50-feet from the BNSF railroad right-of-way and 100-feet from the railroad track. The City of Cottage Grove establishes the required setback from all property lines including the railroad right-of-way. It is unknown whether BNSF will increase rail traffic in the future. Minnesota State Statute 219.57 requires any company operating a railroad to use on each locomotive engine a spark arrester that the master mechanic shall inspect each time before leaving the groundhouse. It is the responsibility of BNSF to train its employees and monitor the active rail lines during the dry season in accordance with the requirements of the statute. It should be noted that there is a long history of homes being constructed adjacent to railroads without serious conflicts or issues. Comment: Item 9: Land Use n) refers to SNA property. Please confirm that assumption is correct. If Response: The Exception Parcel is identified on Figure 3 of the EAW This parcel is privately owned and is not a part of the SNA. It is not proposed for development as part of the Proposed Project. Comment: Item 9: Land Use Add: This development is near railroad tracks and a 3.5 million square foot NorthPoint Logistics Center Response: Comment noted. The presence of the BNSF railroad tracks are referenced in Items 6, 9, and 17 of the EAW. It is noted that the Proposed Project site is located southwest of the NorthPoint Logistics Center which the City approved in December 2021. The Traffic Impact Study prepared for the Proposed Project has been updated to include the NorthPoint Logistics Center and is provided as Attachment C. FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 33 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 Comment: Item 10: Geology, Soils and Topography/Land Forms ter entered the limestone bedrock? And what kind of pond liners and barriers will be used and how long do they last and what type of impact Response: The City, and the Project Proposer, understand that karst conditions may occur in areas with underlying limestone which includes the Project site. Limestone underlies much of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, including in the City of Cottage Grove. The City is not aware of any known sinkholes or similar occurrences within the City but understands that adequate due diligence on the site is critical to ensure that the final design and engineering of the Project is responsive to the site-specific geological conditions. As indicated in EAW item 10, a Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation Report was prepared by the Project Proposer and based on the outcomes of that report additional analysis and study of the site is planned by the Project Proposer. The Project Proposer will work with the City to determine the most appropriate mitigation and site design through the permit and approval process, and will refer to the 8 guidelines outlined in Comment: Item 10: Geology, Soils and Topography/Land Forms Response: Figure 12. NRCS Soil Classifications Map in the EAW identifies the geographic area of the soil classifications. The 329 Chaska silt loam area is identified in purple on the exhibit. This soil classification area generally corresponds to the area of delineated wetlands on the north portion of the site. Comment: Item 10: Geology, Soils and Topography/Land Forms over time and/or ability to handle extreme weather events. Mississippi Dunes should remain undeveloped to help mitigate future extreme weather events. Impervious surfaces will increase substantially with this development, the 3.5 million square foot NorthPoint logistics center, the roads as well as the additional residential and commercial/industrial traffic that will be generated by both and they Item 11: Water Resources the 3.5 million square foot NorthPoint Logistics Center et al can be contained during extreme weather events and prevent damage to the Mississippi River? This development removes the natural river buffer and Б https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Main_Page FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 34 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 filter. Will look forward to seeing and very rob these people ever experienced a sink hole?? Look forward to a very robust SWPPP Plan. And mitigation homeowner? Not insurable. houses, buildings, pavement, roofs, sidewalks, driveways, et al this will Response: Comment noted. The Project Proposer is required to prepare a stormwater management and erosion control plan and SWPPP for the Proposed Project. The stormwater plan and SWPPP must comply with the requirements of the City, South Washington Watershed District (SWWD) and MPCA. As noted in Item 10 no active karst locations have been identified on the site. The stormwater management plan must be developed with consideration of the geologic formations and must locate stormwater features in areas of the site with adequate separation to the limestone bedrock or such features may require pond liners or other methods that create a barrier between the stormwater features and the bedrock. All appropriate permits must be obtained prior to the commencement of site work. (Table 6 in the EAW). The Proposed Project must obtain the following: South Washington Watershed District (SWWD) rules, including wetland buffer requirements, and the SWWD Watershed Management Plan Ordinances. Each of these permits includes a list of specific and detailed stormwater quality and quantity requirements that must be complied with as part of the design. Some of the regulations applicable to the Proposed Project are more stringent due to the location and geography of the site. The Project Proposer must meet all of the regulations and obtain all necessary approvals and permits as detailed in Table 6 of the EAW. Additionally, the Proposed Project does retain a minimum 300-foot vegetative/natural resources and park buffer between the Mississippi River and the development area (Figure 5 in the EAW). Comment: Item 11: Water Resources subject called out on the map in the High Density Residential Senior Housing area? If not, advise location of FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 35 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 Response: As shown on Figure 5 of the EAW a small area of wetland impact is proposed to cross the wetland with a roadway to access the proposed Senior Living building. The proposed Senior Living Building will not be located on or in a wetland. The proposed building(s) will be required to meet all wetland setbacks and follow all buffers as regulated by the South Washington Watershed District (SWWD). The locations of infiltration basins will be determined through the Land Use Application process. Comment: Item 11: Water Resources Response: Comment noted. The proposed homes will be setback a minimum of 200-feet from the railroad tracks. There are no adverse impacts to the structures anticipated as a result of the active BNSF railroad. Comment: Item 11: Water Resources ld be an absolute requirement! Purchase of offsite mitigation credit Robust measures should be implemented to ensure that the River is not impacted in a negative way by Response: Comment noted. The Project Proposer is required to meet the minimum requirements of all regulatory agencies having jurisdiction or authority over the Proposed Project. It should be noted that some minimum requirements will be greater on this site and that the objective is for stormwater mitigation to occur on site. This EAW does not address or include any mitigative response of the NorthPoint Logistics Center. Comment: Item 11: Water Resources \[comment referring to the wetland mitigation and replacement plan\] Response: The Project Proposer must prepare a wetland mitigation and replacement plan prior to the commencement of any site work. This Plan is developed as part of the Land Use Application process which proceeds after the completion of the EAW. The South Washington Watershed District (SWWD) is the Responsible Government Unit (RGU) for administering the wetland conservation act and will be responsible for review and approval of the wetland mitigation and replacement plan. As demonstrated in FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 36 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 Figure 5, the Project Proposer will protect the majority of the wetlands as part of the Project and will follow all required buffers and setbacks for those wetlands protected as required by the SWWD. Comment: Item 17: Noise center are added, there will be increased noise as the cars are humped together. Quality of life would be negatively impacted. Maybe downright miserable. How will this noise by mitigated? List the train schedule times. Provide potential for additional trains or train spurs in the future. How many are anticipated? The logistics center developer will know based on their history. Do trains only run between certain times? Do the semis, truck-trailers, delivery vans, autos for the logistics center only operate between 7 AM and 7 PM? How will the noise levels be mitigated for Response: Comment noted. The railroad is an existing condition and new residents of the Proposed Project will be made aware of its existence through disclosure statements to home buyers. The traffic route of the NorthPoint Logistics Center is not anticipated to pass the Proposed Project, and no adverse noise impacts to the Project are anticipated from its development. Comment: Item 18: Transportation Traffic Solutions might have been unaware of the 3.5 million square foot NorthPoint Logistics Center -trailer, delivery van and car traffic that will dramatically increase the traffic in this area and on these streets. The traffic study provided is not relevant. This traffic study should be redone and updated with relevant estimates that can be provided by the developer of the NorthPoint Trail South, 100th Street, 103rd Street all of these traffic figures will be dramatically impacted by the NorthPoint Logistics Center semi, truck- stic to expect that all of these users (including the semis) will drive 5 miles out of the way south to get to the roundabout on Keats (19) and then exit onto 61 and go 5 miles north to get back to where they started and head towards 494/694. They will be taking Hadley to Grey Cloud Trail through St. Paul Park and over to the 70th Street exit. This whole thing is going to be one major problem. And then add to that, sitting at railroad crossings waiting for the trains to move through. This is an traffic estimates. The study provided is out-of- FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 37 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 Response: Comment noted. The Traffic Impact Study included in the EAW was prepared using the general Industrial land use category from the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The NorthPoint Logistics Center was approved in December 2021 and specific development plan for the area is now known. The Traffic Impact Study has been updated to reflect the approved NorthPoint Logistics Center project and is provided in Attachment C of this response package. Comment: Item 18: Transportation wed to park on the street in Cottage Grove. And an expectation for one parking spot for the senior building is ridiculous. Some day people will be able to visit each other again. Throw parties. More parking (or less housing) is required. Where are visitors there will be no underground garage! Will there even be garages for the senior buildings? There is no bus service in this area. Residents will need to have cars to get to the grocery store or the doctor. This is Response: Comment noted. The City Code establishes the required number of parking stall per unit by use type. The City of Cottage Grove requires 1.5 spaces per unit of Senior Citizen Housing. The Proposed Project must demonstrate compliance with the required number of parking stalls that will be determined when the final number units and architectural plan are reviewed during the Land Use Application process. It is expected that parking will be accommodated through a combination of below grade and surface parking options. Extreme caution has been given to the design and placement of the proposed buildings to ensure all buildings are constructed to avoid conflicts with the water table. Comment: Item 18: Transportation Senior Living Building being served through Metro Mobility\] Response: Comment noted. The information was obtained from the City of Cottage Grove 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Comment: Item 19: Cumulative Potential Effect - trailers, delivery vans and cars that will impact this area and its residents. There are 37 trains that run on these tracks daily. The tracks are right next to the development. No indication of how this will be mitigated or if there is the potential for increased rail traffic. There are numerous issues identified FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 38 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 Response: Comment noted. The Traffic Impact Study included in the EAW was prepared using the general Industrial land use category from the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The NorthPoint Logistics Center was approved in December 2021 and specific development plan for the area is now known. The Traffic Impact Study has been updated to reflect the approved NorthPoint Logistics Center project and is provided in Attachment C of this response package. The November TIS, as well as the updated TIS, reflects that specific improvements to the roadways are required to adequately mitigate the traffic generated by the Proposed Project. There is a long history of homes being adjacent to railroads without serious conflicts or issues. Comment: Item 20: Other Potential Environment Effects Response: Comment noted. 17. CITIZEN) Comment: Item 13: Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) Sand would need to be removed from the acreage as well as all of the existing trees which would be Response: The City evaluated the land area adjacent to the Mississippi River during the Master Plan process and identified several areas to be preserved as park or open space. The areas the City identified as highest value are located within the area identified on Figure 4 and Figure 5 of the EAW adjacent to the Mississippi River. The area shown is approximately 25-acres. Comment: Item 13: Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) mitigation" proposed by the Housing Developer and the EAW would be disastrous regarding the Environment and Climate Response: Comment noted. The proposed mitigation contained in the EAW is intended to offset the potential negative impacts to the environment as a result of the Proposed Project. Mitigation includes implementation of BMPs, conducting ecological surveys to determine areas of significant habitat, and requiring all necessary permits to be obtained. FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 39 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 Comment: Item 18: Transportation and Item 11: Water Resources Negative impact on both the current residents of Cottage Grove and the surrounding Communities. The EAW states that there would be an additional 4,000 vehicle road trips per day. Which is based on 2 people/ household, which I believe is underestimated. There is also an underestimation regarding water usage and sewer usage- Response: Comment noted. The average persons per household is based on the unit-mix of the Proposed Project, as well as demographic information provided by the Metropolitan Council. Water and sewer usage assumptions are based on actual historical use within the City. Comment: Item 14: Historic Properties Historical house located on the property and a barn. The house has been used as a rental Response: Comment noted. Comment: Item 9: Land Use cons. The land usage must remain Open Space to become a Park that would benefit the Community, the current residents, surrounding Communities and future generations of Response: Comment noted. 18. SCHWARTZ, BARB (CITIZEN) Comment: Item 11: Water Resources mitigation plan if the levels exceed the upper limit? The EAW states the water would eventually enter the river after flowing through segments of the designated Critical Area. Since adjacent areas are considered Response: Comment noted. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) in coordination with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and the Watershed Districts monitor phosphorous and other FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 40 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 bodies. The Proposed Project is required to meet all City and South Washington Watershed District (SWWD) requirements for stormwater management on the site which establishes requirements for quality and quantity control. (See Item 11.b.ii. of the EAW) Comment: Item 10: Geology, Soils and Topography/Land Forms hastens the process. The mitigation suggested seems tenuous at best, e.g. using children's pool material to keep this from happening in this large area. Will all the aging limestone in the area surrounding the m. It can collapse causing a sinkhole. They also emit CO2. This is proof that the limestone is thinning as are the depth samples taken. A workable protection plan seems imperative. Would the City be libel if sink holes occurred? Will buyers be Response: Comment noted. The City, and the Project Proposer, understand that karst conditions may occur in areas with underlying limestone which includes the Project site. Limestone underlies much of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, including in the City of Cottage Grove. The City is not aware of any known sinkholes or similar occurrences within the City but understands that adequate due diligence on the site is critical to ensure that the final design and engineering of the Project is responsive to the site-specific geological conditions. As indicated in EAW item 10, a Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation Report was prepared by the Project Proposer and based on the outcomes of that report additional analysis and study of the site is planned by the Project Proposer. The Project Proposer will work with the City to determine the most appropriate mitigation and site design through the permit and approval process and will refer to 9 the Comment: Item 18: Transportation -seven trains pass through daily. There could be derailments and/or leakage of transported substances. The EAW does no address what is being transported. Were decibel measurements taken? Noise pollution seems like a certainty. How will children and pets, both populations known to stray, Response: Comment noted. The train is an existing condition and pre-dates the Proposed Project. All future homeowners will be aware of the train, the frequency of trips, sounds associated with train tracks and that the trains will transport a variety of substances and materials. Railroads are a common and known commodity for home buyers. В https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Main_Page FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 41 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 Comment: Item 11: Water Resources -site mitigation credit? If it allows loosening regulations a la Quid Quo Pro, I am against such Response: Comment noted. Comment: Item 11: Water Resources Response: Comment noted. No. The Proposed Project cannot compromise the existing well or water supply. Comment: Item 20: Other Potential Environmental Effects Response: Comment noted. Citizens in apartment buildings, townhomes, or condominium, residents with a slab on grade home will seek shelter either in a strong commercial structure (malls, libraries, etc.) or in an interior room without windows. In the event that residents need to leave their homes due to an emergency, two main ingress/egress access locations connect the neighborhood to Grey Cloud Trail S that provide access to the greater region. Comment: amount of CO2 that would be absorbed if there were less impervious surfaces. The TIMES states this runoff is the primary source of pollution of rivers and 8% of lakes. Urban Heat Islands form impervious surfaces creating pockets or islands of high solar heat. Impervious surfaces would/could have a higher Response: Comment noted. Comment: he EAW is neutrality, neither for nor against development, it is biased. It only gives FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 42 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 e change for The EAW inserted documentation dating back to 2013 as if still current. Shouldn't this be updated. Response: Comment noted. The purpose of the EAW is to review a Proposed Project for potential environmental impacts. The Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB) provides the EAW template form that was last updated in 2013 which is documented in the upper left corner of the EAW. The current form includes 20 Items that must be addressed. The subject property is located in an area designated as part of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) where the Metropolitan Council requires suburban densities because regional infrastructure has been designed to serve the area. Comment: Item 11: Water Resources could escape into the water. Is there a flood plan? If a drought occurs the shallow back waters have an algae bloom resulting in a stench, and low oxygenation for fish and wild-life. None of these realistic Response: Comment noted. The Project Proposer is required to prepare a stormwater management plan that addresses the 2, 10 and 100-year flood events. The stormwater and erosion control plan must be reviewed and approved by the City and South Washington Watershed District (SWWD). Shallow back waters is an existing condition. Comment: Item 11: Water Resources permit. What is the plan for the increased TP and TSS loading being exported from this project after Response: There are specific design requirements that the Project Proposer must meet before obtaining approvals/permits related to stormwater, NPDES, and erosion control. Comment: Item 13: Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) communities that exist, that more information on potential impacts be considered FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 43 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 Response: Comment noted. As stated in Item 13.d. of the EAW the Project Proposer will hire a qualified ecologist to prepare a survey plan of the site acceptable to the MnDNR. As part of the survey process the Project Proposer will work with the MnDNR on any required permitted, mitigation and construction/site development activities. 19. SCHWEN, BILL (CITIZEN) Comment: Item 11: Water Resources Response: The Project Proposer is required to demonstrate compliance with the City and South Washington Watershed District (SWWD) standards as stated in Item 11b.ii. The City and SWWD standards require peak flow rates after development to not exceed pre-development peak flow rates for the 2-year, 10-year and 100-year events. Comment: Item 9: Land Use Response: Comment noted. As stated in Item 9 of the EAW, a comprehensive plan amendment is required and will compliance with the City and SWWD standards as part of the Land Use Application process. Comment: Item 18: Transportation -- Even with our very low traffic volume, 3 people have died hitting that bridge since I moved here. With the forecasted increase in traffic, how many more will die or suffer serious injury? Another problematic issue with the master plan is noted in figure 4 of the EAW. That diagram places the main access to the development just beyond the railroad bridge. Significant rush hour congestion there is guaranteed Response: Comment noted. The Project Proposer is working with the City and Washington County on determining safest access into the Proposed Project. The location of the access points was determined based on spacing guidelines and sight lines. These locations are studied in the Traffic Impact Study (TIS) provided in Appendix C of the EAW. FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 44 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 Comment: Item 18: Transportation a multistory elderly retirement building where a hook and ladder fire truck has to drive Response: Comment noted. The Project Proposer is working with the City and Washington County on determining safest access into the Proposed Project site for all residents of the Proposed Project. The final location will be identified in the plans reviewed during the Land Use Application process. 20. SMITH, CHRISTOPHER (CITIZEN) Comment: Item 13: Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) Response: vicinity of the Proposed Project. Comment: Item 13: Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) fails to do its due diligence in respect to the federally endangered rusty-patched bumble federally protected northern long-eared bat, (Myotis septentrionalis) (hereafter NLEB), protected birds will be followed to t Following applicable federal law is not optional. Assuming the project relies on the Final 4(d) Rule for the NLEB to achieve compliance (though this is not clear, there is no statement in the EAW about how the project will follow federal law related to this species), the EAW should discuss in detail, what steps will be taken to avoid and minimize impacts to propose FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 45 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 roperty use, as a golf course, somehow precludes the possibility of these rare species from occurring on site and/or somehow creates a net benefit via the conversion of the area to residential development. Yet, the EAW provides no tangible data or support to back up this Response: Comment noted. As stated in Item 13(d) of the EAW, the Project Proposer must work with a qualified ecologist to develop a survey plan that is acceptable to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. The developed survey plan will be tailored to the existing site conditions and an acceptable development and construction plan, including appropriate mitigative strategies, will be developed to the satisfaction of the MnDNR. The Project Proposer will be required to follow the agreed to survey plan and site d MRCCA ordinance. Comment: Item 19: Cumulative Potential Effect h increases in impervious surfaces, increases in salt and other deicing products, increases in roadkill (including turtles), and other similar impacts that may affect terrestrial and/or aquatic organisms (e.g., Response: Comment noted. As stated in Item 19.c. of the EAW based on the available information and existing planning efforts, there are no known cumulative environmental impacts that cannot be effectively mitigated provided proper permitting and development processes are followed. This includes proper mitigation associated with stormwater management (impervious surface), runoff (increases in salt, etc.), and impacts that may affect terrestrial or other aquatic organisms such as the endangered mussels. Comment: Item 20: Other Potential Environmental Effects The project proposer fails to address reasonably foreseeable maintenance needs associated with a Response: Comment noted. Comment: Item 15: Visual FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 46 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 Response: Comment noted. The Proposed Project will be required to comply with Section 11-6-8 Zoning Ordinance. Review of the lighting plan will be performed as part of the Land Use Application process. Comment: Item 13: Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) commits to following all erosion the use of erosion control materials that reduce the risk of wildlife entanglement and/or microplastics. Response: Comment noted. As stated in Item 13.d. bullet 4 of the EAW the Project Proposer will use erosion control products that have biodegradable netting as recommended by the MnDNR. Comment: Item 8: Required Permits and Status ion and/or permits. Note that per the endangered species, or (2) has a substantial potential for inhibiting the procreative ability of an Response: Comment noted. Comment: Item 13: Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) ersation of the property from a golf course to a residential development will result in fewer pesticides being applied. The EAW provides no evidence to support this assertion, nor does the EAW mention that the golf course has been closed for many years, and presumably few if any pesticides have been utilized on the property in recent years. The EAW fails to discuss the fact that commercial applications of pesticides are done by licensed applicators, whereas many residential applications are done by the home Response: Comment noted. The golf course use was terminated at the end of 2017. Since 2018 the site has been studied for redevelopment. Several resources are available from the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) that indicate the use of pesticides and herbicides can remain on the property for several years especially in area of high use (generally greens and tee boxes) as well as in areas where the products were stored. FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 47 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 Comment: Item 13: Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) pr Response: Comment noted. The information available from the MnDNR regarding sites with Biodiversity Significance is dated from 1987-1989 for the Proposed Project site and identifies a patch of potential significance in the north central portion of the site and the southeastern portion of the site. This data pre- dates the development of the golf course in 1995, which heavily disturbed the area identified in the northcentral portion of the site. The area in the southeastern corner is the area that the MnDNR is interested in purchasing and adding to the adjacent SNA. Comment: Item 13: Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) have tried to acquire portions of the site to conserve state and globally significant natural resources presence (e.g., remnant prairie, globally imperiled species). Many of these important natural resources will be lost/destroyed by the proposed project. Public ownership of portions of the proposed project area for the purposed of Response: Comment noted. As stated in Item 6, 9 and 13 of the EAW the Project Proposer is working with the City and the MnDNR on a plan to protect the entire Mississippi River frontage for a combination of park, open space and natural area. Further, the Project Proposer is working with the MnDNR on the protection of approximately 12-acres on the southeaster edge of the site to be added to the SNA. Comment: Item 13: Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) from construction of a large residential development immediately adjacent to the property. In addition, residential developments sharing an unprotected border with a protected natural area is known to increase the invasion of the natural area by non-native plants and animals, lawn maintenance chemicals Response: Comment noted. The Project Proposer does not have regulatory authority to manage the use of the SNA but is working collaboratively with the MnDNR on a sale of land to expand the SNA. Comment: Item 13: Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) esota Rules, Section 6106.0160 and City ordinance. The FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 48 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 EAW mentions the presence of a City Ordinance, but the proposed action, as presented, appears to Response: the Mississippi River Critical Corridor Area (MRCCA) which is addressed in Items 9, 11, and 15 and is geographically shown on Figure 7 of the EAW. It is noted throughout the EAW that the Proposed MRCCA ordinance. Comment: Item 8: Permits and Approvals Required assumed, absent discussion in the EAW to the contrary, that the project proposer will require numerous variances to deliver the proposed project including variances related to the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area. A project proposer cannot both create practical difficulties and then allege hardships that will foreseeably requi Response: Comment noted. The City will determine if any variances are needed as part of the Land Use Application process. Comment: Item 13: Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) (Mississippi National River and Recreation Area) and most probably to a Scientific and Natural Area (SNA), in which case the project also triggers a mandatory EAW under 4410.4300, Subp. 30 and allows Response: Comment noted. As stated in Minnesota State Statute 116G.15, the Proposed Project is located in the Mississippi National River and Recreation Area, and private land and homes are located within this Proposed Project site but the boundary has been established by an official Certificate of Survey. 21. TIEFENBRUCK, GRANT (CITIZEN) Comment: Item 11: Water Resources the sanitary sewer system to this somewhat isolated patch of the City. The size of these lots do not seem FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 49 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 Response: Comment noted. The Project Proposer is working with the City to determine the appropriate density and unit types to support the extension of the water supply to this area of the City. Comment: Item 13: Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) during the course of this project. This Response: Comment noted. A minimum of 25-acres along the Mississippi River frontage is planned for permanent protection as open space, park and natural area. Comment: Item 13: Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) should, probably, be a City initiative for all home owners to do that. I am very doubtful that I will see any Response: Comment noted. The Project Proposer is required to follow the recommended mitigation stated in the EAW which requires all stormwater management ponds and areas to be seeded using the approved MnDOT or BWSR native seed mix. Comment: Item 13: Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) Environmental Assessment address Climate Change impacts? We know that destroying the rainforests is a bad thing to do. Why do we think that disturbing an existing ecosystem in MN has less effect? There should be provisions for the final project to at least be carbon neutral going Response: Comment noted. The City is required to use the official EAW form and completed the Items identified on the form. It is outside the scope of an EAW to study whether climate change is more negatively impacted 22. WILLIAMS, COLE (CITIZEN) Comment: Item 11: Water Resources ssociated with the NPDES permit with a plan to address states current grasses, forest, etc. will be replaces with turf grass and impervious surfaces which could FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 50 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 Response: Comment noted. The Proposed Project must comply with all stormwater and erosion control regulations. Comment: Item 11: Water resources hydraulically connected to the Mississippi River Main stem, thus any impact on these waters would directly impact an impaired water body. (Upper St. Another Falls to St. Croix River is Impaired). The water within 1 mile of this proposed development should Response: this EAW item. The response accurately states that the Grey Cloud Slough, Mooers and Grey Cloud Channel are adjacent waters within 1-mile of the Proposed Project site and that these waters are not se waters are interconnected with the Mississippi River and that runoff from the Project Area ultimately drains to the Mississippi River that all additional stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) for discharges must be implemented. Comment: Item 11: Water Resources Response: Comment noted. Comment: Item 13: Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) Response: The Proposed Project site is not owned by any public or government agency. 23. WHALEY, BRETT (CITIZEN) Comment: Item 9: Land Use \[Figure 5\] will be a cheap Pulte housing development there? I just find it incredibly sad that the area will permanently ruined and am extremely FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 51 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 Response: Comment noted. The Proposed Project has not been approved and is subject to the City of Cottage in Table 6 of the EAW. 24. ZIMMER ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT (PRIVATE BUSINESS) Comment: Item 16: Air The Mississippi Dunes EAW fails to consider the greenhouse gas emissions or carbon footprint for the addition of 499 houses and the near- Item 20: Other Potential Environmental Effects he urban heat island by approximately 0.11 degrees Celsius. This is a significant figure when one considers preventing a full-blown climate Response: Comment noted. Comment: Item 16: Air Response: Comment noted. The Proposed Project was evaluated for compliance with the requested information identified in Item 16. Comment: Item 11: Water Resources Scenic River with some i Response: Comment noted. Comment: Item 13: Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) mile of the project site, no Response: As stated in Item 13(d) of the EAW, the Project Proposer must work with a qualified ecologist to develop a survey plan that is acceptable to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. The developed FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 52 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 survey plan will be tailored to the existing site conditions and an acceptable development and construction plan, including appropriate mitigative strategies, will be developed to the satisfaction of the MnDNR. The Project Proposer will be required to follow the agreed to survey plan and site development ordinance. PUBLIC HEARING TESTIMONY & RESPONSES 25. MATTER, BONNIE (CITIZEN) Comment: Did the Planning Commission Members read the public comments that were submitted regarding the EAW? Response: Comment noted. Comment: There are 37 daily trains that run by the proposed development. Missing from the EAW was information like the distance between the tracks and the residences in the development. Negative impact on the iesel engine smells and air quality; Train vibrations; Structural damage to houses due to foundation and settling issues; Potential grass fires in dry, hot summers from sparks; Train schedules: Morning, afternoon, evening, night, all the time, when do they future rail traffic impact future residents; what are the mitigation plans for these issues? Response: Comment noted. As shown on Figure 5 of the EAW the closest lot is setback approximately 50-feet from the BNSF railroad right-of-way and 100-feet from the railroad track. The proposed homes will be setback a minimum of 200-feet from the railroad tracks. There are no adverse impacts to the structures anticipated as a result of the active BNSF railroad. The City of Cottage Grove establishes the required setback from all property lines including the railroad right-of-way. It is unknown whether BNSF will increase rail traffic in the future. Minnesota State Statute 219.57 requires any company operating a railroad to use on each locomotive engine a spark arrester that the master mechanic shall inspect each time before leaving the groundhouse. It is the responsibility of BNSF to train its employees and monitor the active rail lines during the dry season in accordance with the requirements of the statute. It should be noted that there is a long history of homes being constructed adjacent to railroads without serious conflicts or issues. Comment: The substantial in FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 53 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 Response: Comment noted. The Project Proposer is required to prepare a stormwater management and erosion control plan and SWPPP for the Proposed Project. The stormwater plan and SWPPP must comply with the requirements of the City, South Washington Watershed District (SWWD) and MPCA. All appropriate permits must be obtained prior to the commencement of site work. (Table 6 in the EAW). The Proposed Project must obtain the following: South Washington Watershed District (SWWD) rules, including wetland buffer requirements, and the SWWD Watershed Management Plan Ordinances. Each of these permits includes a list of specific and detailed stormwater quality and quantity requirements that must be complied with as part of the design. Some of the regulations applicable to the Proposed Project are more stringent due to the location and geography of the site. The Project Proposer must meet all of the regulations and obtain all necessary approvals and permits as detailed in Table 6 of the EAW. Comment: Building a senior apartment building on a slab foundation on wetlands; slabs will freeze and thaw and crack. Vibration from trains will exacerbate the Response: Comments noted. As shown on Figure 5 of the EAW a small area of wetland impact is proposed to cross the wetland with a roadway to access the proposed Senior Living building. The proposed Senior Living Building will not be located on or in a wetland. The proposed building(s) will be required to meet all wetland setbacks and follow all buffers as regulated by the South Washington Watershed District (SWWD). The locations of infiltration basins will be determined through the Land Use Application process Comment: indicates that if they cannot meet the requirements, the purchase of off-site mitigation credits is an option. In a sensitive critical area, mitigation should be an absolute requirement. There should be no purchase of off-site mitigation credits. Where would a statement like this ever be considered for the type of area under review? Response: Comment noted. The Project Proposer is required to prepare a stormwater management and erosion control plan and SWPPP for the Proposed Project. The stormwater plan and SWPPP must comply with the requirements of the City, South Washington Watershed District (SWWD) and MPCA. All appropriate permits must be obtained prior to the commencement of site work. (Table 6 in the EAW). The Proposed Project must obtain the following: FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 54 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 South Washington Watershed District (SWWD) rules, including wetland buffer requirements, and the SWWD Watershed Management Plan Ordinances. Each of these permits includes a list of specific and detailed stormwater quality and quantity requirements that must be complied with as part of the design. Some of the regulations applicable to the Proposed Project are more stringent due to the location and geography of the site. The Project Proposer must meet all of the regulations and obtain all necessary approvals and permits as detailed in Table 6 of the EAW. Comment: the east. Response: It is noted that the Proposed Project site is located southwest of the NorthPoint Logistics Center which the City approved in December 2021. The Traffic Impact Study prepared for the Proposed Project has been updated to include the NorthPoint Logistics Center and is provided as Attachment C. Comment: all those homes had to be evacuated? How do the residents all get out at one time with one outlet; 369 single-family homes, 130 senior units, and a multifamily building? Response: As shown Figure 5. Concept Sketch Plan in Appendix A of the EAW there are two access road connections into the new development from Grey Cloud Trail South. The road network internal to the Proposed Project site is interconnected to ensure two access locations are provided to residents in the new neighborhoods. Comment: to allow the development to move forward, then you must help protect both the Mississippi River and future homeowners in that development. This is only a portion of what she submitted. Response: Comments noted. Please see response to written EAW comments in #16 of this package. 26. Comment: FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 55 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 istress in St. Paul Park; she thinks that rates as something important and is of historical value. Response: Comment noted. A person of significance living or working at a property is sometimes part of the historical designation process. The City hired New History to study the existing home on the property. That report did not uncover any associations with significant persons or events. Comment: She noticed with the EAW that they addressed the endangered species that have been seen in that area, species. Response: Comment noted. As stated in Item 13.d. of the EAW, the Project Proposer must work with a qualified ecologist to develop a survey plan that is acceptable to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. The developed survey plan will be tailored to the existing site conditions and an acceptable development and construction plan, including appropriate mitigative strategies, will be developed to the satisfaction of the MnDNR. The Project Proposer will be required to follow the agreed to survey plan and site MRCCA ordinance. Comment: You have a chance to include it with the SNA, along with the Grey Cloud Island Regional Park; make it one whole thing, whether that be the State, with the DNR, or in combination with the City, like we have of entities that put that together. Response: Comment noted. Comment: The other thing that she noticed in the EAW is the fact that the land is sand; the EAW says that all of that sand would have to be removed for there to be any housing put in. To Response: The Proposed Project must obtain the following: MP South Washington Watershed District (SWWD) rules, including wetland buffer requirements, and the SWWD Watershed Management Plan xcavation Ordinances. FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 56 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 Each of these permits includes a list of specific and detailed stormwater quality and quantity requirements that must be complied with as part of the design. There is a list of specific and detailed stormwater quality and quantity regulations that must be complied with as part of the design of the Proposed Project. Additionally, there are erosion and sediment control regulations that must be incorporated into the design to obtain the required approvals and permits. Some of the regulations applicable to the Proposed Project are more stringent due to the location and geography of the site. The Project Proposer must meet all of the regulations and obtain all necessary approvals and permits as detailed in Table 6 of the EAW. Comment: The other thing she thought about was she had worked at Pullman Elementary with the Rainbow Kids school. Response: Comment noted. As stated in the Public Hearing transcript there appears to be adequate capacity at Pullman Elementary School. Comment: day, about 136,000+ gallons of sewage per day, and 4,000 extra cars on the road. Response: Comment noted. The average persons per household is based on the unit-mix of the Proposed Project, as well as demographic information provided by the Metropolitan Council. Water and sewer usage assumptions are based on actual historical use within the City. FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 57 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 III. FINDINGS OF FACT a. Project Description The Former Mississippi Dunes Golf Course Project is a new neighborhood in Cottage Grove that is planned for a mix of market rate single-family detached homes, senior living opportunities, parks and open space. Located adjacent and north of the Mississippi River corridor, the neighborhood will provide a maximum of 239 new detached single-family homes, 130 age-targeted active detached townhomes and an approximately 130-unit Senior Living Building. An extensive network of open spaces and trails is planned and will provide public access to the river and the surrounding community. b. Corrections to the EAW Table 6: Required Permits and Status is corrected to add the following: Units of Government Type of application Status State Minnesota Department of Sealing of Wells To be applied for if unsealed Health (MDH) wells are identified Regional Minnesota Pollution Control Sanitary Sewer Extension To be applied for Agency (MPCA) Permit Local Washington County Septic System Abandonment To be applied for Permit Appendix C: Traffic Impact Study (TIS) of the EAW has been updated to include the development approval of the NorthPoint Logistics Center. The updated TIS is provided as Attachment 3 of this response package. The modification did not result in any significant changes to the conclusions or mitigative recommendations. Section 14: Historic Properties. The City commissioned New History to complete a historic evaluation of the William Cowan/Herb Fritz house, which was completed after the release of the EAW. A copy of this report is included as Attachment 4 to this response package. FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 58 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 IV. DECISION REGARDING NEED FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT a. Type, Extent and Reversibility of Impacts The City of Cottage Grove finds that the analysis completed for the EAW is adequate to determine whether the project has the potential for significant environmental impacts. The EAW described the type and extent of impacts anticipated to result from the Proposed Project. This document provides clarifications and summarizes the dominant and recurring issues within the EAW. Geology, Natural Resources, Water Resources, and Transportation were the items within the EAW and within comments received that were found to be impacted by the Proposed Project. By following the mitigation outlined within the EAW and in the response to comments, the impacts will be avoided, minimized, and/or mitigated. b. Cumulative Potential Effects of Related or Anticipated Future Projects The cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects noted during the comment period includes the recent approval of the NorthPoint Logistics Center located northeast of the Proposed Project. The Traffic Impact Study (TIS) was updated to reflect the recently approved project and no significant changes to the initial recommended mitigation identified in the November 2021 study were identified. No other cumulative effects were identified during the comment period. The cumulative impacts identified in the EAW were evaluated and determined that if the identified mitigative steps are implemented and all permitting processes are followed that there are no anticipated cumulative environmental impacts as a result of the Proposed Project. c. Extent to which Environmental Effects are Subject to Mitigation by Ongoing Public Regulatory Authority The mitigation of environmental impacts will be designed and implemented in coordination with the applicable regulatory agencies. All mitigation efforts will be subject to the plan approval and permitting process. Permits and approvals that have been obtained, or those that may be required prior to construction, are identified on Table 1. FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 59 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 Table 1: Permits and Approvals Permit Agency Action Required ROW Permit Washington County Permit Drainage Permit Washington County Permit Road Access Permit Washington County Permit Pre-Demolition Permit Washington County Permit Other utility or construction permits (to City of Cottage Grove Permit(s) be confirmed with City) NPDES Construction Permit MPCA Permit Construction Stormwater Permit MPCA Permit Demolition Notification MPCA Approval Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit MPCA, Metropolitan Council Permit Water Supply Connection Minnesota Department of Health Permit Watermain Plan Review Minnesota Department of Health Approval Stormwater Plan Review South Washington Watershed Approval EAW City of Cottage Grove Record of Decision EIS Decision City of Cottage Grove Record of Decision 2040 Comprehensive Plan City of Cottage Grove Approval Amendment Rezoning City of Cottage Grove Approval Planned Unit Development City of Cottage Grove Approval Preliminary Plat City of Cottage Grove Approval Final Plat City of Cottage Grove Approval SWPPP City of Cottage Grove Permit Land Disturbance and Erosion and City of Cottage Grove Permit Sediment Control Permit Demolition Permit City of Cottage Grove Permit ROW Permit City of Cottage Grove Permit Building Permits City of Cottage Grove Permit Sign Permit City of Cottage Grove Permit HVAC, Plumbing, Electrical Permits City of Cottage Grove Permit Fire sprinkler and alarm permits City of Cottage Grove Permit d. Extent to which Environmental Effects can be Anticipated and Controlled as a Result of Other Environmental Studies. The City finds: 1. The Proposed Project is reasonably similar to residential projects in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. Other projects of similar scope, accompanied by similar land use, natural resources, surface water, traffic studies, and associated mitigation, have, in general, successfully mitigated potential environmental impacts. 2. The EAW, in conjunction with this document, contains or references the known studies that provide information or guidance regarding environmental effects that can be anticipated and controlled. FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 60 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 3. No EIS that addresses a similarly sized project is known to be available in the City of Cottage Grove or the surrounding area. 4. In light of the results of environmental review and permitting processes for similar projects, the City of Cottage Grove finds that the environmental effects of the project can be adequately anticipated and controlled. Based on the original EAW, comments received from agencies and individuals, the responses to comments, and the criteria above, the City of Cottage Grove finds that the Former Mississippi Dunes Golf Course Proposed Project does not have the potential for significant environmental effects and does not require the preparation of an EIS. FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 61 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 V. RECORD OF DECISION Based on the EAW, the Response to Comments and the Findings of Fact, the City of Cottage Grove City Council concludes the following: 1. All requirements for environmental review of the Proposed Project have been met. 2. The EAW and the development processes related to the Proposed Project have generated information which is adequate to determine whether the Proposed Project has the potential for significant environmental effects. 3. Areas where potential environmental effects have been identified the City has included proper mitigative responses to be included within the final design of the Proposed Project. Mitigation will be required to be provided where impacts are expected to result from project construction, operation, or maintenance. Mitigative measures will be required to be incorporated into the Proposed Project design and have been or will be coordinated with state and federal agencies during the applicable permit process. 4. Based on the criteria in Minnesota Rules part 4410.1700, the Proposed Project does not have the potential for significant environmental effects. 5. An Environmental Impact Statement is not required for the proposed Former Mississippi Dunes Golf Course Proposed Project. For the City of Cottage Grove Christine Costello Date Community Development Director City of Cottage Grove FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE - EAW 62 Findings of Fact and Record of Decision | February 2022 BUUBDINFOUT FOWJSPONFOUBM!BTTFTTNFOU!XPSLTIFFU SFTQPOTF!UP!DPNNFOUT-!GJOEJOHT!!PG!GBDU!BOE!SFDPSE!PG! EFDJTJPO Gpsnfs!Njttjttjqqj!Evoft!Hpmg!Dpvstf Djuz!pg!Dpuubhf!Hspwf-!Njooftpub Gfcsvbsz!3133 BUUBDINFOU!2/!!DPNNFOUT!SFDFJWFE BUUBDINFOU!3/!!JNQBJSFE!XBUFST!NBQ BUUBDINFOU!4/!SFWJTFE!USBGGJD!JNQBDU!TUVEZ BUUBDINFOU!5/!OFX!IJTUPSZ!SFQPSU!PO!XJMMJBN!DPXBO0IFSC!GSJU\[!IPVTF BUUBDINFOU!B;!DPNNFOUT!SFDFJWFE FOWJSPONFOUBM!BTTFTTNFOU!XPSLTIFFU SFTQPOTF!UP!DPNNFOUT-!GJOEJOHT!!PG!GBDU!BOE!SFDPSE!PG! EFDJTJPO Gpsnfs!Njttjttjqqj!Evoft!Hpmg!Dpvstf Djuz!pg!Dpuubhf!Hspwf-!Njooftpub BHFODZ!DPNNFOUT FOWJSPONFOUBM!BTTFTTNFOU!XPSLTIFFU SFTQPOTF!UP!DPNNFOUT-!GJOEJOHT!!PG!GBDU!BOE!SFDPSE!PG! EFDJTJPO Gpsnfs!Njttjttjqqj!Evoft!Hpmg!Dpvstf Djuz!pg!Dpuubhf!Hspwf-!Njooftpub Friends of the Mississippi River Kbovbsz!6-!3132 Fnjmz!Tdinju{-!Tfojps!Qmboofs Djuz!pg!Dpuubhf!Hspwf 23911!Sbwjof!Qbslxbz!T/ Dpuubhf!Hspwf-!NO!66217 Efbs!Fnjmz; Gsjfoet!pg!uif!Njttjttjqqj!Sjwfs!)GNS*!bqqsfdjbuft!uif!pqqpsuvojuz!up!dpnnfou!po!uif! Fowjsponfoubm!Bttfttnfou!Xpsltiffu!)FBX*!gps!Qvmuf!Ipnft“!sfefwfmpqnfou!qspqptbm!gps! uif!gpsnfs!Njttjttjqqj!Evoft!hpmg!dpvstf/ Njttjttjqqj!Evoft!jt!b!sbsf!boe!fdpmphjdbmmz!wbmvbcmf!bsfb/!Tboe!evoft!mjlf!uiftf!bsf!bo! fydfqujpobmmz!sbsf!mboetdbqf!jo!uif!Uxjo!Djujft!boe!bdsptt!uif!tubuf/!Uif!tjuf!bmtp!jodmveft! 2-:11!gffu!pg!Njttjttjqqj!Sjwfs!tipsfmjof-!qspwjeftibcjubu!gps!tfwfsbm!uisfbufofeboe! foebohfsfe!tqfdjft-!boe!bekpjot!uif!Hsfz!Dmpve!Evoft!Tdjfoujgjd!boe!Obuvsbm!Bsfb!)TOB*/!Bmm! pg!uiftf!bttfut!nblf!Njttjttjqqj!Evoft!npsf!gsbhjmf!uibo!nptu!puifs!sfefwfmpqnfou!tjuft!jo! Dpuubhf!Hspwf/Boz!sfefwfmpqnfou!ifsf!nvtu!cf!epof!xjui!uif!hsfbuftu!pg!dbsf/! Hjwfo!uif!vojrvf!obuvsf!pg!uijt!qspqfsuz!boe!uif!bsfb“t!sbsffdpmphjdbmsftpvsdft-!uijt! qspqptfe!qspkfdu!ibt!uif!qpufoujbm!gps!tjhojgjdbou!fowjsponfoubm!fggfdut/Uifsfgpsf!Dpuubhf! Hspwf!tipvme!sfrvjsfboFowjsponfoubm!Jnqbdu!Tubufnfou gps!uijt!qspqptfe!qspkfdu/ Xf!bmtp!sfrvftu!sfwjtjpot!up!uif!gpmmpxjoh!FBX!tfdujpot; 21/!Hfpmphz-!tpjmt-!boe!upqphsbqiz0mboe!gpsnt 22/!Xbufs!sftpvsdft Uif!upqphsbqiz!boe!tpjm!uzqft!jo!uif!qspkfdu!bsfb!qsftfou!tqfdjbm!dpotjefsbujpot/!Cfdbvtf! tboez!tpjmt!bsf!tp!bctpscfou-!tvctvsgbdf!xbufs!npwfnfou!uispvhi!uif!tjuf!xjmm!cf!tjhojgjdbou/! Uif!tjuf“t!tmpqf!upxbset!uif!sjwfs!tvhhftut!uibu!xjuipvu!njujhbujpo-!tvctvsgbdf!xbufs!svopgg! xjmm!npwf!upxbset!uif!sjwfs/!Tmpqf!tubcjmjuz-!xbufs!wpmvnf!uispvhi!uif!tjuf-!boe!jnqbdut!up! ofjhicpsjoh!tjuft!gspn!uijt!xbufs!npwfnfou!offe!up!cf!dbsfgvmmz!tuvejfe/! Uif!FBX!tipvme!jodmvef!Njojnbm!Jnqbdu!Eftjho!Tuboebset!bt!b!njujhbujpo!tusbufhz!gps!uif! qpufoujbm!qspkfdu!jnqbdut!up!xbufs!sftpvsdft/!Njujhbujpo!tipvme!jodmvef!b!qmbo!up!jodpsqpsbuf! tupsnxbufs!usfbunfou!bsfbt!uispvhipvu!uif!qspkfdu!bsfb!up!usfbu!xbufs!bt!dmptfmz!up!jut!tpvsdf! bt!qpttjcmf-!sfevdjoh!uif!sjtl!pg!ibsn!gspn!tvctvsgbdf!xbufs!npwfnfou/!Ju!xjmm!opu!cf!wfsz! gfbtjcmf!up!qjqf!tupsnxbufs!gspn!pof!foe!pg!uif!tjuf!pwfs!up!uif!puifs-!tp!uif!qspkfdu!tipvme! opu!ejsfdu!bmm!tupsnxbufs!up!kvtu!pof!ps!uxp!usfbunfou!bsfbt!bt!tipxo!jo!Gjhvsft!5!boe!6/!! Uijt!bsfb!pg!uif!Njttjttjqqj!Sjwfs!ibt!ijhi!dimpsjef!mfwfmt/!Up!njujhbuf!ibsn!gspn!jodsfbtfe! spbexbzt!boe!spbe!tbmujoh!jo!boe!bspvoe!uif!qspkfdu!bsfb-!bmm!dimpsjef!svopgg!tipvme!cf! dbquvsfe!po!tjuf/!Uif!qspkfdu!tipvme!bmtp!jodmvef!b!tbmu!nbobhfnfou!qmbo!up!mjnju!vtf!pg!spbe! tbmu!po!cpui!qvcmjd!spbexbzt!boe!qsjwbuf!esjwfxbzt!boe!tjefxbmlt/!! Xf!bmtp!fodpvsbhf!uif!bqqspqsjbuf!bvuipsjujft!up!dmptfmz!tvqfswjtf!Qvmuf!Ipnft“!beifsfodf! up!jut!Tupsnxbufs!Qpmmvujpo!Qsfwfoujpo!Qmbo/!Qvmuf!Ipnft!ibt!b!usbdl!sfdpse!pg!Dmfbo!Xbufs! Bdu!wjpmbujpot!jo!bu!mfbtu!gjwf!tubuft/! ! 24/!Gjti-!xjmemjgf-!qmbou!dpnnvojujft-!boe!tfotjujwf!fdpmphjdbm!sftpvsdft! ! Qspufdujpo!dpodfsot!gps!uif!svtuz.qbudife!cvncmf!cff!bsf!opu!mjnjufe!up!uif!tqfdjft“!”bdujwf! tfbtpo/•!Svtuz.qbudife!cvncmf!cfft!ep!opu!njhsbuf<!uifz!bsf!mjlfmz!qsftfou!bu!uijt!tjuf!zfbs. spvoe/!Jo!uif!xjoufs!uif!rvffo!cfft!ijcfsobuf!voefshspvoe!b!gfx!jodift!cfmpx!uif!tvsgbdf/!Jg! uif!rvffot!bsf!ljmmfe!cz!dpotusvdujpo!bdujwjuz!pwfs!uif!xjoufs-!uif!foujsf!dpmpoz!dfbtft!up! fyjtu/!Uif!FBX!nvtu!efnpotusbuf!uif!qspkfdu“t!gvmm!dpnqmjbodf!xjui!uif!gfefsbm!Foebohfsfe! Tqfdjft!Bdu/!Uif!FBX!tipvme!bmtp!jodmvef!tuspohfs!bobmztjt!pg!svtuz.qbudife!cvncmf!cfft“! ibcjubu!offet-!dpotusvdujpo!ujnjoh-!boe!qspufdujwf!qsbdujdft!uibu!dbo!cf!voefsublfo!bt! njujhbujpo!tusbufhjft/!! ! Cjse!Tqfdjft!jo!Hsfbuftu!Dpotfswbujpo!Offe-!jodmvejoh!uif!foebohfsfe!Ifotmpx“t!tqbsspx-! bsf!epdvnfoufe!up!cf!qsftfou!bu!uif!Njttjttjqqj!Evoft!tjuf!)opu!tjnqmz!jo!uif!wjdjojuz*/!Qvcmjd! fCjse!sfdpset!cz!fyqfsjfodfe!cjsefst!epdvnfou!uiftf!sbsf!cjset“!dpotjtufou!qsftfodf/!Uiftf! cjset!bsf!lopxo!up!cf!wfsz!tfotjujwf!up!ibcjubu!”qbudi!tj{f•!boe!fehf!dpoejujpot!gps! sfqspevdujwf!tvddftt/!Uif!qspqptfe!qspkfdu!xjmm!voepvcubcmz!sfevdf!uif!cjset“!ibcjubu!bsfb! boe!mjlfmz!ibsn!uifjs!bmsfbez.gsbhjmf!qpqvmbujpot/! ! Uif!FBX!tipvme!jodmvef!npsf!njujhbujpo!tusbufhjft!up!qspufdu!uiftf!tqfdjft/!Beejujpobm! njujhbujpo!tusbufhjft!dpvme!jodmvef!ujnjoh!wfhfubujpo!sfnpwbm!boe!hsbejoh!pvutjef!pg!uif! cjset“!oftujoh!tfbtpo-!bssbohjoh!uif!tjuf!qmbo!up!fobcmf!bt!nvdi!dpoujhvpvt!ibcjubu!bt! qpttjcmf-!boe!fnqmpzjoh!bo!fdpmphjtu!up!eftjho!wfhfubujpo!uibu!epfto“u!gvsuifs!efhsbef! bekbdfou!ibcjubu!bu!uif!TOB!cz!dsfbujoh!jnqspqfs!fehf!dpoejujpot!po!uif!Njttjttjqqj!Evoft! qspqfsuz/!! ! Uif!FBX!tipvme!bmtp!jodmvef!b!qmbo!up!njujhbuf!jnqbdut!pg!jodsfbtfe!ivnbo!wjtjupstijq!bu!uif! ofjhicpsjoh!TOB!evf!up!uif!beejujpo!pg!ivoesfet!pg!sftjefout!ofyu!up!uif!TOB/!Bo!jodsfbtf!jo! pgg.usbjm!ivnbo!usbggjd!jo!uif!TOB!dpvme!cf!qbsujdvmbsmz!ibsngvm!cfdbvtf!pg!uif!tjuf“t!gsbhjmf! hfpmphz!boe!sbsf!qmbou!tqfdjft/!Njujhbujpo!dpvme!jodmvef!eftjho!fmfnfout!)tvdi!bt!uif!qmbuujoh! ipnf!mput-!beejoh!usbjm!dpoofdujpot-!boe!vtjoh!gfodjoh!ps!puifs!cbssjfst*!up!cmpdl!fhsftt!up!uif! TOB!pvutjef!pg!fyjtujoh!usbjmt/!!! ! Uijt!tfdujpo!tipvme!bmtp!tubuf!uibu!uif!qspkfdu“t!wfhfubujpo!nbobhfnfou!qsbdujdft!nvtu!cf! gvmmz!dpnqmjbou!xjui!uif!djuz“t!Njttjttjqqj!Sjwfs!Dpssjeps!Dsjujdbm!Bsfb!)NSDDB*!psejobodf/!! ! 25/!Ijtupsjd!qspqfsujft! ! Uif!qspkfdu!bsfb!ibt!bo!fyufotjwf!ijtupsz!pg!ivnbo!vtf-!jodmvejoh!Joejhfopvt!tfuumfnfou/! Hsfz!Dmpve!Jtmboe!dpoubjot!sbsf!qsf.dpoubdu!bsdibfpmphjdbm!sftpvsdft-!jodmvejoh!Xbtijohupo! Dpvouz“t!mbshftu!lopxo!dpodfousbujpo!pg!cvsjbm!npvoet-!boe!xbt!uif!tjuf!pg!uif!pomz! epdvnfoufe!Joejhfopvt!wjmmbhf!jo!uif!dpvouz/!Ju!jt!sfbtpobcmf!up!cfmjfwf!uibu!uif!Njttjttjqqj! Evoft!qspkfdu!bsfb!nbz!bmtp!dpoubjo!bsdibfpmphjdbm!sftpvsdft!hjwfo!jut!qspyjnjuz!up!uiftf! epdvnfoufe!tjuft/!! ! Bt!opufe!jo!uif!esbgu!FBX“t!dpssftqpoefodf!xjui!uif!Tubuf!Ijtupsjd!Qsftfswbujpo!Pggjdf-!uif! nbkpsjuz!pg!bsdibfpmphjdbm!tjuft!jo!uif!tubuf!ibwf!opu!cffo!sfdpsefe/!B!mbdl!pg!epdvnfoufe! sftpvsdft!po!uif!qspkfdu!tjuf!tipvme!opu!cf!ublfo!bt!bo!bttvsbodf!uibu!tvdi!sftpvsdft!ep!opu! fyjtu/!! ! Hjwfo!uif!qspkfdu“t!qspyjnjuz!up!tjuft!pg!jnnfotf!ijtupsjd!tjhojgjdbodf-!gvsuifs!tuvez!tipvme!cf! dpoevdufe!cfgpsf!dpodmvejoh!uibu!uif!qspqptfe!qspkfdu!xjmm!opu!bewfstfmz!bggfdu! bsdibfpmphjdbm!ps!dvmuvsbm!sftpvsdft/!Uif!Qsbjsjf!Jtmboe!Joejbo!Dpnnvojuz-!bt!xfmm!bt!boz! puifs!joufsftufe!usjcft!ps!Joejhfopvt.mfe!pshboj{bujpot-!tipvme!cf!jowjufe!up!dpotvmu!po!uijt! tuvez/! ! 26/!Wjtvbm! ! Xf!ejtbhsff!uibu!”uifsf!bsf!op!tdfojd!wjfxt!ps!wjtubt!jefoujgjfe!jo!uif!djuz“t!NSDDB!qmbo•!)42*/! Uif!Qvcmjd!Sjwfs!Dpssjeps!Wjfx!gspn!Ib{fo!Q/!Nppfst!Qbsl!xjmm!cf!bggfdufe!cz!uijt!qspkfdu/! Njttjttjqqj!Evoft!jt!dmfbsmz!wjtjcmf!jo!uif!qipup!pg!uijt!wjfx!jodmvefe!jo!uif!djuz“t!NSDDB!qmbo/! Uif!Qvcmjd!Sjwfs!Dpssjeps!Wjfx!gspn!uif!Hsfz!Dmpve!Evoft!TOB!nbz!bmtp!cf!bggfdufe/!B!wjtvbm! bobmztjt!pg!uif!qspkfdu“t!jnqbdut!up!uiftf!wjfxt!tipvme!cf!dpoevdufe!bt!qbsu!pg!uijt!FBX!boe! bqqspqsjbuf!njujhbujpo!tusbufhjft!fnqmpzfe/! ! Uif!hpbm!pg!njujhbujpo!tipvme!cf!up!qsftfswf!b!wjfx!bt!tjnjmbs!up!uif!fyjtujoh!wjfx!bt!qpttjcmf-! qsjpsjuj{joh!wfhfubujwf!tdsffojoh!boe!njojnj{joh!uif!wjtjcjmjuz!pg!ofx!tusvduvsft/!Qfs!uif!EOS-! tusbufhjft!up!njujhbuf!wjtvbm!jnqbdut!dbo!jodmvef;! Vtjoh!cvjmejoh!nbufsjbmt!uibu!cmfoe!jo!xjui!obuvsbm!tvsspvoejoht-!tvdi!bt!hsffo!ps! cspxo!nbufsjbmt! Qmbdjoh!uif!mpoh!byjt!pg!tusvduvsft!qfsqfoejdvmbs!up!uif!sjwfs Sfevdjoh!uif!cvml!pg!tusvduvsft-!tvdi!bt!cz!vtjoh!gmbu!sppgt!ps!sfevdfe!sppg!qjudift Jodsfbtjoh!tfucbdlt!gspnuif!sjwfs Uibol!zpv!gps!zpvs!buufoujpo!up!pvs!dpnnfout/ Tjodfsfmz- Dpmmffo!P“Dpoops!Upcfsnbo Sjwfs!Dpssjeps!Ejsfdups December 28, 2021 Emily Schmitz, Senior Planner City of Cottage Grove 12800 Ravine Parkway South Cottage Grove, MN 55016 RE:City of Cottage Grove-Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) –Former Mississippi Dunes Golf Course Metropolitan Council Review No. 22704-1 Metropolitan Council District No. 12 Dear Ms. Schmitz: The Metropolitan Council received an EAW for the former Mississippi Dunes golf courseproject in Cottage Groveon November 23, 2021. The proposed project is located on the site of the former Mississippi Dunes Golf Course.The Project is a new neighborhood in Cottage Grove that is planned for a mix of market rate single-familydetached homes, senior living opportunities, parks and open space. Located adjacent andnorth of theMississippi River corridor, the neighborhood will provide a maximum of 239 new detached single-familyhomes, 130 age-targeted active 55+ detached townhomes,and an approximately 130-unit Senior Living Building. The staff review finds that the EAW is complete and accurate with respect to regional concerns and raises no major issues of consistency with Council policies. An EIS is not necessary for regional purposes. This concludes the Council’s review of the EAW. The Council will take no formal action on the EAW. If you have any questions or need further information, please contact Jake Reilly, Principal Reviewer, at 651-602-1822 or via email at jake.reilly@metc.state.mn.us. Sincerely, Angela R. Torres, AICP, Manager Local Planning Assistance CC:Tod Sherman, Development Reviews Coordinator, MnDOT -Metro Division Francisco Gonzalez, Metropolitan Council District No.12 Jake Reilly, Sector Representative/Principal Reviewer Reviews Coordinator N:\\CommDev\\LPA\\Communities\\Cottage Grove\\Letters\\Cottage Grove 2021 Mississippi Dunes EAW 22704-1.doc.docx Division of Ecological and Water Resources Transmitted by Email Region 3 Headquarters 1200 Warner Road Saint Paul, MN 55106 December 22, 2021 Emily Schmitz, Senior Planner City of Cottage Grove 12800 Ravine Parkway Cottage Grove, MN 55016 Dear Emily Schmitz, Thank you for the opportunity to review the Former Mississippi Dunes Golf Course EAW. The DNR greatly appreciates the early coordination and consideration of the Grey Cloud Dunes Scientific and Natural Area (SNA) throughout the development of this project. As a prominent neighbor to this development, the DNR has an interest in any project that could affect the use of the SNA by both wildlife and the community as well as our management of this natural resource. We recognize the willingness on the part of the City of Cottage Grove to facilitate the expansion of the SNA and to ensure that natural resource concerns are addressed through the environmental review process. Less than 1% of Minnesota's native prairie remains and the remaining prairie mostly consists of widely scattered small fragments surrounded by agriculture and development. Many of the species that rely on these prairies have been extirpated from our state or are on the brink of being lost, and so protecting remaining prairie remnants is critically important. It was not feasible for DNR and partner organizations to purchase the entire project area, therefore we prioritized the highest quality habitat for the 12 acres expansion of the SNA. We recognize the challenge that many cities are facing in balancing heightened development pressures with natural resource management and protection. With that in mind, we respectfully submit the following comments for your consideration: 1. Page 8, Construction Timing of Site Development Activities. The project proposes to start grading activities in the Spring/Summer of 2022. The Natural Heritage Review (NHIS) letter, dated November 19, 2021, identifies several threatened and endangered plant and animal species within the direct vicinity of the project. Minnesota’s Endangered Species Statute (Minnesota Statutes, section 84.0895) and associated Rules (Minnesota Rules, part 6212.1800 to 6212.2300 and 6134) prohibit the take of threatened or endangered species without a permit. Avoidance and survey requirements will need to be met before any grading of the site or tree removal can proceed. Species-specific work exclusion dates and survey timeframes will affect the timing of construction. Please consult with the Endangered Species Environmental Review Coordinator, Lisa Joyal (lisa.joyal@state.mn.us), regarding this process. 2. Page 11, Table 6: Required Permits and Status. Table six should note the need for the developer and/or the City of Cottage Grove to obtain a DNR Water Appropriation Permit should there be a need for construction dewatering of water (either surface or ground water) in volumes exceeding 10,000 gallons per day, or one million gallons per year. A DNR Water Appropriation Permit is required regardless of whether the dewatering is for water mains, sanitary sewers, other utilities, grading of the site, constructing storm water ponds, or establishing footings for new buildings. 3. Page 11, Table 6: Required Permits and Status. Table six should also note that a DNR Takings Permit may be necessary if state-listed threatened and endangered species will be impacted as the result of this project. 4. Page 13, Land Use. We appreciate the effort on the part of the City of Cottage Grove to protect the open space along the Mississippi River Corridor by creating a park to maintain habitat and enable the public’s access to the river. 5. Page 13, Land Use. The EAW should provide additional information to discuss whether the project complies with the requirements of the Mississippi River Critical Corridor Area (MRCCA) plan and zoning regulations. This discussion should include a review of Primary Conservation Areas (PCAs) identified in the MRCCA plan. 6. Page 15, Geology. Part of the project area is located in a region prone to surface karst feature development. This was confirmed by project borings that encountered soft limestone bedrock near the surface. Great care should be taken to avoid releasing any pollutants in this area that could quickly reach groundwater. We appreciate that care will be used in locating stormwater features. We recommend that site grading also avoids exposing karst-prone bedrock. 7. Drinking Water, Page 19. Please note that if the private wells are not going to be used, then they are required to be sealed rather than capped. 8. Page 20, Post Construction Conditions. The planned increase in impervious surfaces will also increase the amount of road salt used in the project area. Chloride released into local lakes and streams does not break down, and instead accumulates in the environment, potentially reaching levels that are toxic to aquatic wildlife and plants. Consider promoting local business and city participation in the Smart Salting Training offered through the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. There are a variety of classes available for road applicators, sidewalk applicators, and property managers. More information and resources can be found at this website. Many winter maintenance staff who have attended the Smart Salting training — both from cities and counties and from private companies — have used their knowledge to reduce salt use and save money for their organizations. We also encourage cities and counties to provide public outreach to reduce the overuse of chloride. Here are some educational resources for residents as well as a sample ordinance regarding chloride use. 9. Page 21, Post Construction Conditions. The DNR recommends that stormwater be used for irrigating the landscaping, as is done in the City of Hugo and the City of Medina. This will reduce the volume of pollutants and stormwater leaving the site. 10. Page 22, Post Construction Conditions. We recommend using BWSR-approved, native seed mixes for seeding stormwater features, project landscaping, and soil stabilization. Due to the proximity to the SNA, please make sure that all seed mixes are free of noxious weeds and invasive species. 11. Pages 26-29, Rare Features. This section mentions the previous agricultural and golf course uses of parts of the project area, but fails to identify that the area planned for development is mapped as a Minnesota Biological Survey (MBS) Site of High Biodiversity Significance as well as a DNR Native Plant Community (NPC). Despite the previous uses and disturbance, sections of the project area within the golf course were left intact and may yet contain rare plants and valuable wildlife habitat. Though the previous use as a golf course disturbed these plant communities, the conversion of an additional 43 acres to impervious surfaces is a more significant impact and should not be minimized. The MBS Site was mentioned by DNR in the November 19, 2021 NHIS letter and in early coordination documents. Sites of Biodiversity Significance have varying levels of native biodiversity and are ranked based on the relative significance of this biodiversity at a statewide level. Sites ranked as “High" contain very good quality occurrences of the rarest species, high-quality examples of rare native plant communities, and/or important functional landscapes. Dry Sand – Gravel Prairies (Southern) are listed as imperiled and every effort should be made to preserve what remnants are left. This particular MBS Site will be completely eliminated by the housing development under the current proposal. This site has been disturbed by previous land use and may no longer qualify as a prairie remnant. However, the golf course left areas of prairie intact and it is likely that native plant communities and seed banks persist and could be fully restored. 12. Page 29, Rare Features. The project proposes to avoid impacts to the Rusty-patched bumble bee, Leonard’s skipper, Regal fritillary and the Monarch butterfly by completing the vegetation disturbance early in the 2022 season. Due to the potential need for plant surveys during the growing season, these mitigation measures are unrealistic. Permanently converting even degraded grassland to impervious surfaces will remove habitat within the project area and should be considered a long-term impact. Because the Rusty-patched bumble bee is a federally- listed as endangered, please coordinate with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service regarding mitigation for long-term impacts to this species. 13. Page 30, Rare Features. The summary of DNR’s requirements should mention that tree/shrub th removal is prohibited from April through August 15 to avoid impacting endangered bird species that have been documented in the direct vicinity of the project. Please coordinate with DNR if this is not feasible as bird surveys may be necessary prior to disturbance. 14. Page 32, Dust and Odors. If water is taken from the Mississippi River for controlling dust, then the use of more than 10,000 gallons of water in a day must be approved under a DNR Water Appropriation Permit. 15. Page 32, Dust and Odors. Please do not use products that contain chloride for dust control. 16. The DNR supports the development of a park that will allow the community to access and engage with the Mississippi River and the unique ecosystem of the area. Please include the SNA in trail planning in order to ensure that trail locations meet the management needs of all parties and that encroachment onto the SNA is prevented. We look forward to continuing coordination on the addition to Grey Cloud Dunes SNA, specifically in regards to trail routes leading to or along the SNA, and other such recreational developments. 17. The railroad corridor runs through the SNA directly adjacent to the project area is owned and operated by BNSF Railway. Please include them in any planning that involves railroad crossings. 18. Stormwater from the development should not be directed towards or allowed to pool on the current or future SNA. Thank you again for the opportunity to review this document and for your continued coordination. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Melissa Collins Regional Environmental Assessment Ecologist | Ecological and Water Resources Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, MN 55106 Phone: 651-259-5755 Email: melissa.collins@state.mn.us CC: Paul Heuer, Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC 328 West Kellogg Blvd St Paul, MN 55102 OSA.Project.Reviews.adm@state.mn.us Date:12/14/2021 Emily Schmitz City of Cottage Grove 651-458-2874 eschmitz@cottagegrovemn.gov Project Name:Former Mississippi Dunes golf course Notes/Comments Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the above referenced project. Review of our files indicates there are no previously recorded archaeological sites, archaeological site leads, or burials within the proposed project area. However, the project is situated within a district replete with archaeological and cemetery sitesand is adjacent to the Mississippi River. Therefore,a phase I archaeological reconnaissance conducted by a qualified archaeologist is recommended. The Minnesota Historical Society maintains a list of archaeologists here: https://www.mnhs.org/preservation/directory. Recommendations Not Applicable No Concerns Monitoring Phase Ia –Literature Review Phase I –Reconnaissancesurvey Phase II –Evaluation Phase III –Data Recovery If you require additional information or have questions, comments, or concerns please contact our office. Letter1 Sincerely, Jennifer Tworzyanski Assistant to the State Archaeologist OSA Kellogg Center 328 Kellogg Blvd W St Paul MN 55102 651.201.2265 jennifer.tworzyanski@state.mn.us Letter 2 December 22, 2021 Emily Schmitz Senior Planner City of Cottage Grove 12800 Ravine Parkway South Cottage Grove, MN 55016 Re: Former Mississippi Dunes Golf Course Environmental Assessment Worksheet Dear Emily Schmitz: Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the Former Mississippi Dunes Golf Course project (Project) in the city of Cottage Grove, Washington County, Minnesota. The Project consists of a new residential development on a former golf course. Regarding matters for which the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has regulatory responsibility or other interests, the MPCA staff has the following comments for your consideration. Cover types (Item 7) The cover types listed in the table under Item 7 do not seem to portray the existing site conditions accurately. For example, under open space, zero acres are listed. It would seem that a golf course would have a significant amount of open space. Permits and Approvals (Item 8) It may be necessary to obtain a Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit from the MPCA prior to construction. The application form and additional information on this process can be found at http://www.pca.state.mn.us/water/permits/index.html#sanitarysewer. Questions on the sanitary sewer extension permit process should be directed to Dave Sahli at 651-757-2687 or David.Sahli@state.mn.us. Water Resources (Item 11) Wastewater This section mentions the additional work and utilities that must be extended to serve the Project, but there are no details about that work in the EAW. There was a mandatory EAW completed for the Cottage Grove South District Trunk Sewer earlier this year. If that sewer needs to be extended again for this Project, a separate mandatory EAW may be required. This related work, and whether a mandatory EAW is needed for the extension of the sewer to this site, needs to be discussed in more detail. Stormwater The Project proposes disturbance of 110 acres of the 164-acre site and will discharge stormwater to the Mississippi River, which has construction-related impairments. Because the Project will disturb 50 or more acres, the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will need to be submitted for review and approval by MPCA prior to obtaining National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System/State Disposal System (NPDES/SDS) Construction Stormwater Permit (CSW Permit) coverage. Emily Schmitz Page 2 December 22, 2021 The EAW mentions three existing stormwater ponds on the site to be utilized for rate control. The EAW also mentions use of infiltration basins for volume control unless not feasible and that the city allows the ability to use off site mitigation credits to meet volume control requirements if onsite Best Management Practices (BMPs) are not possible. The EAW does mention the presence of hydric soils and karst features at the site that may prohibit infiltration but also discusses use of filtration and bio filtration areas for meeting volume control requirements. However, filtration may not be considered to be a method of volume control by the CSW Permit. The Proposer is strongly encouraged to consider opportunities upgradient of hydric areas for bioinfiltration and use of green infrastructure practices to reduce stormwater runoff and provide climate resilience to increasing rainfall. Consider also reducing pervious surfaces contributing to runoff by constructing narrower streets or using pervious pavements. Pervious pavements would also help to reduce need for winter salting and resulting chloride pollution from the new development. Please direct questions regarding CSW Permit requirements to Roberta Getman at 507-206-2629 or Roberta.Getman@state.mn.us. Contamination/Hazardous Materials/Wastes The Project is located in an area of Washington County near areas that have extensive groundwater contamination from multiple sources. Furthermore, these are located in areas where the groundwater is highly vulnerable to contamination from the surface because there is relatively little overlying fine-grained protective soil material. Please note that golf courses have the potential for contamination from past pesticide use (including mercury) and from past storage and handling of pesticides and fertilizers. Information regarding soil sampling is available on the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) website at: Guidance Document 30 - Soil Sampling at Golf Courses for Contamination | Minnesota Department of Agriculture. The operation of heavy equipment in and near lakes, streams and wetlands obligates the project proposers to develop a plan for managing fuels and lubricants, including a plan of action to implement in the event of spills. The Project proposer and their contractors should be prepared to respond to spills and to recover and contain spilled material as quickly and thoroughly as possible. For petroleum spills that are five or more gallons, the Project proposer or their contractors are required to contact the State Duty Officer at (651) 649-5451 or (800) 422-0798. Information on reporting spills and leaks is available on the MCPA website at: http://www.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/view-document.html?gid=2807. Emily Schmitz Page 3 December 22, 2021 We appreciate the opportunity to review this Project. Please provide your specific responses to our comments and notice of decision on the need for an Environmental Impact Statement. Please be aware that this letter does not constitute approval by the MPCA of any or all elements of the Project for the purpose of pending or future permit action(s) by the MPCA. Ultimately, it is the responsibility of the Project proposer to secure any required permits and to comply with any requisite permit conditions. If you have any questions concerning our review of this EAW, please contact me by email at Karen.kromar@state.mn.us or by telephone at 651-757-2508. Sincerely, Karen Kromar This document has been electronically signed. Karen Kromar Project Manager Environmental Review Unit Resource Management and Assistance Division KK/RG/DS/CVH:rs cc: Dan Card, MPCA, St. Paul Roberta Getman, MPCA, Rochester Dave Sahli, MPCA, St. Paul Cathy Villas-Horns, MDA, St. Paul December 27, 2021 EmilySchmitz, Senior Planner City of Cottage Grove 12800 Ravine Parkway South Cottage Grove, MN 55016 RE:EAW-Former Mississippi River Dunes Golf Course Cottage Grove, WashingtonCounty SHPO Number: 2022-0383 Dear EmilySchmitz: Thank you for providing this office with a copy of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the above-referenced project. Due to the nature and location of the proposed project, we recommend that a Phase I archaeological survey be completed. The survey must meet the requirements of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Identification and Evaluation and should include an evaluation of National Register eligibility for any properties that are identified. For a list of consultants who have expressed an interest in undertaking such surveys, please visit the website , and select “Archaeologists” in the “Search by Specialties” box. We will reconsider the need for survey if the project area can be documented as previously surveyed or disturbed. Any previous survey work must meet contemporary standards. plowed areas and right- of-way are not automatically considered disturbed. Archaeological sites can remain intact beneath the plow zone and in undisturbed portions of the right-of-way. Please note that this comment letter does not address the requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and 36 CFR § 800. If this project is considered for federal financial assistance, or requires a federal permit or license, then review and consultation with our office will need to be initiated by the lead federal agency. Be advised that comments and recommendations provided by our office for this state-level review may differ from findings and determinations made by the federal agency as part of review and consultation under Section 106. If you have any questions regarding our review of this project, please contact Kelly Gragg-Johnson, Environmental Review Program Specialist, at kelly.graggjohnson@state.mn.us. Sincerely, Sarah J. Beimers Environmental Review Program Manager MINNESOTA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE 50 Sherburne Avenue Administration Building 203 Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155 651-201-3287 mn.gov/admin/shpo mnshpo@state.mn.us A N EQUAL OPPORTUNITY AND SERVICE PROVIDER NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Mississippi National River and Recreation Area 111 E. Kellogg Blvd., Ste 105 IN REPLY REFER TO: St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1256 1.A.1 January 6, 2022 Emily Schmitz Senior Planner City of Cottage Grove 12800 Ravine Parkway South Cottage Grove, MN 55016 RE: Former Mississippi Dunes golf course EAW Dear Emily Schmitz: The Mississippi National River and Recreation Area (MNRRA) is pleased to provide comments on the Former Mississippi Dunes golf course Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). The proposed project would lie completely within the boundary of the Mississippi National River and Recreation Area (NRRA). Congress established the Mississippi NRRA in 1988 to preserve, protect, and enhance the significant values of the Mississippi River Corridor in the Twin Cities metropolitan area. The Former Mississippi Dunes golf course (Mississippi Dunes) is in a unique site that would benefit from the inclusion of more natural areas than what is being proposed. While much of the development has been disturbed for agriculture and as a golf course, it has not been maintained for several years. The 164 acres of open space should be developed with precautions as not to disturb any species of concern at Mississippi Dunes since it has been vacant. While we have concerns over the proposed Mississippi Dunes development, there are a few aspects of the design in the EAW we do appreciate. The space allotted as park is more than what is required by ordinance and designating over a 300-foot setback from the Mississippi River is quite generous. While we are pleased that these portions of the development have been set aside as park space, we do not want to see a housing development that will remove 6.9 acres of woodlands/forests, and 3.8 acres of brush/grasslands. This would remove 100% of these cover types. Table 5 states there will be an increase of 27.8 acres of open/natural space, not including a single acre before the development. This is misleading as the majority of the 164 acres has become more natural since it has been vacant. Incorporating established natural cover types into the development’s design would be better than demolishing this established habitat. This is especially true on the western side of the development where dry tall grasses and forests tie into the Grey Cloud Dunes Scientific and Natural Area (SNA). These established natural areas should be preserved as natural extensions of the SNA. We would like more attention brought to the fact that this stretch of the Mississippi River, and the Mississippi Dunes site, are also part of the Mississippi National River and Recreation Area (NRRA). Congress established the Mississippi NRRA in 1988 to preserve, protect, and enhance the significant values of the Mississippi River Corridor in the Twin Cities metropolitan area. The Mississippi NRRA shares a boundary with the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA), and we appreciate that the proposed development will adhere to updated MRCCA ordinances being adopted by the City of Cottage Grove. The national significance of this stretch of the Mississippi River and its resources should be included in this section. As stated above, Mississippi Dunes has not been managed in several years since the golf course closed. Stating that the heavy use of pesticides and herbicides will decrease is misleading since there has been no active management at the site. Disturbance of the natural spaces and addition of a housing development will likely increase this level of activity from present use. Buffers around sensitive areas should be implemented to prevent conflicting uses from the development and should be encouraged wherever possible. Drift and runoff from chemicals and fertilizers from lawn care could impact habitat on the neighboring SNA given the proximity of housing to the SNA. Buffering would also decrease other negative impacts from human use like erosion from increased foot traffic in natural areas and wildlife harassment from pets and humans. While the SNA is open to the public, it is not a public park that is designed to handle significant human activity, especially given the sensitive habitats located at Grey Cloud Dunes SNA. Housing placed on the boundary will likely increase human use and degradation of the significant natural resources of the SNA. We recommend that the City of Cottage Grove follow the recommendations in the Natural Heritage Review from the MN Department of Natural Resources in Appendix B. There are several rare species found within the search area for the Mississippi Dunes site. A qualified surveyor should conduct a habitat assessment prior to construction to prevent any damage to the rare and sensitive resources. We disagree with the assessment that there are no scenic views or vistas identified in the MRCCA plan. There are two Public River Corridor Views (PRCV) within the immediate area of the Mississippi Dunes site. One is located at Hazen P. Mooers Park that overlooks the southern portion of the Mississippi Dunes site and the north east portion of Grey Cloud Island. Set back of the development will decrease the impacts to this PRCV. The other PRCV is from the Grey Cloud Dunes SNA. While there are no overlooks or established trails in the SNA, the elevated and open bluffs of the SNA provide striking views of the natural areas around the SNA. Removal of vegetation for the development will impact the natural views from the SNA. Maintaining existing vegetation and the addition of vegetation within the housing development may reduce impacts from the SNA’s PRCV. While the proposed development in the EAW is in line with the requirements of MRCCA, there is still more that can be done to preserve and enhance the natural environment. The Mississippi NRRA is willing to assist by providing input during the continued design of this project. If you any questions regarding these comments, please contact my staff, Adam Muilenburg at adam_muilenburg@nps.gov or by calling 651-293-8440. Sincerely, Ejhjubmmz!tjhofe!cz!NBUUIFX! CMZUIF! NBUUIFX!CMZUIF Ebuf;!3133/12/17!26;12;21!.17(11( Matthew T. Blythe Superintendent CC Paul Heuer January 6, 2022 Emily Schmitz Senior Planner, City of Cottage Grove 12800 Ravine Parkway S. Cottage Grove, MN 55016 RE: Mississippi Dunes EAW Dear Ms. Schmitz, The Washington Conservation District (WCD) has reviewed the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the Mississippi Dunes redevelopment project and has the following comments: Section 6 - Project Description: The Project Proposer’s Concept Sketch Plan (Appendix A Figure 5) has not been inserted at a legible resolution, does not include a legend or key to features, and does not appear to include the 12-acre addition to Grey Cloud Dunes SNA. Please provide a revised Concept Sketch Plan for interpretability and agreement with the proposed Master Plan. Section 7 – Cover Types: Although a large portion of the site has been disturbed and is now dominated by non- native cover types, correspondence with the Minnesota DNR located in Appendix B notes the possibility of existing and intact native plant communities in isolated areas. Further survey work is needed to identify areas containing rare or sensitive natural features. Section 8 – Permits and Approvals Required: The project location requires a zoning and comprehensive plan amendment to allow for the proposed medium-density development. The WCD supports a zoning ordinance that minimizes visual and environmental impacts to adjacent CA-ROS and CA-RN districts within the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA). Section 9 – Land Use: WCD encourages the Project Proposer to maximize the amount of restored or undeveloped natural space within the project area to protect and enhance the scenic, ecological, cultural, and recreational value of the corridor. The Project Proposer should describe the steps that will be taken to protect Priority Conservation Areas (PCA’s), including bluff and shoreline impact zones, significant existing vegetation stands, or native plant communities. Section 10 – Geology, Soils and Topography/Landforms: The Project Proposer states there are no known sinkholes, limestone formations, or karst conditions within the site, though there are several known formations in the area (Figure 14 of the EAW). The Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation Report found near-surface, “highly weathered” limestone bedrock and near-surface groundwater features at multiple boring locations across the site. More information is needed to evaluate potential impacts to surface and groundwater features in areas that will be disturbed. Section 11 – Water Resources: In Section 11.a.i The Project Prosper states, “Segments of the waterway are identified on the MPCA 303d Impaired Water List, but Moers Lake, Grey Cloud Channel and Grey Cloud Slough are not listed on the Impaired List which are the waterbodies within 1-mile of the Project Area”(Page 17 of the EAW). The segment of theMississippi Riverbetween Upper St Anthony Falls and theSt Croix Riveris listed for several impairments,including nutrients and TSS, PFOS, PCBs, and mercury. This segment of the Mississippi River is inclusive ofGrey Cloud Channel, Grey Cloud Slough, and Mooers Lake. Discussion of these impairments must therefore be identified and discussedin this section. A 2015 study completed by the Metropolitan Council found high chloride (Cl) concentrations in Pool 2 of the Mississippi River near Grey Cloud Island.TheProject Proposer should address new potential sources of chloride associated with development (e.g. road salts orwater softener brine) and proposemeasures for reducing chloride usage andpreventingchloride contamination of wetlands and/or receiving waterbodies. Section 13 –Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities, and SensitiveEcological Resources: Section 13a-b of the EAW provides an NHIS summary of “rare species or significant natural features”documented within 1-mile of the project area. This section also identifiesendangered, threatened, or special concern speciesdocumentedon site or likely to occurnearby.This list is by no means exhaustive (as noted in Appendix B), and there are many other Species in Greatest Conservation Need that are known to occur in the area,including dickcissel, bobolink, American kestrel, eastern meadowlark, and others(as documented by the ‘Grey Cloud Dunes SNA Bird Checklist’ and eBird reports for Grey Cloud Dunes SNA).Further survey work is needed to assess the presence/absence of sensitive ecological featureswithin the project siteand to assess the risksassociated with site development. Section 14 –Historic Properties:The Project Proposer acknowledges the site’s proximity to several historic structures and archeological sitesvia MNSHPO correspondence located in Appendix B. These sites include the NRHP-listed Schilling Archaeological District (STN:21WA1)and Michaud-Koukal Mounds(21WA2), Grey Cloud Town Site (21WA48), and the NRHP-listed Grey Cloud Lime Kiln site. Past archeological surveys of the Spring Lake/Grey Cloud Island area have revealed many other historically significant sites along the corridor, some dating as far back as the Early Woodland period (Fleming et al 2018; Anfinson 2003). The Washington Conservation District supports further investigation(with reference to Appendix B of the EAW)by the SHPO andTribal Historic Preservation Officesto fully assess the project area’s potential to contain sites with historic or archeological significance. Section 15 –Visual:Light pollution is another environmental impact worthy of consideration for this project given the site’s adjacency to Grey Cloud Dunes SNAand other natural areas. Light pollution has the potential to disrupt nesting and mating patterns for many wildlife species. The Project Proposer should address how the lighting plan may be designed to mitigate impacts towildlife, particularly migratory bird species. Conclusion:TheEAWaddresses many important cultural and environmental concerns, including sensitive geological features, rare or at-risk wildlife species and native plant communities, and sites of historical significance. More information is needed, however, to adequately determinethe presence/absence of state or federally listed speciesand archeological resources,assess potential impacts toat-risk wildlife species documented nearby at Grey Cloud Dunes SNA,and to further evaluate the impact of development on sensitive geological features and groundwater resources. Accordingly, additional updates to the EAW are needed unless the City decides to require anEIS to guide a more thorough and robust assessment of potential project impacts to the resource concerns above. Please contact the WCD if you have any questions regarding these comments. Sincerely, Jay Riggs, District Manager jriggs@mnwcd.org 3of 3 Public Works Department Donald J. Theisen, P.E. Director Wayne H. Sandberg, P.E. Deputy Director/County Engineer December 29, 2021 Emily Schmitz Senior Planner City of Cottage Grove 12800 Ravine Parkway South Cottage Grove,MN 55016 WASHINGTON COUNTY COMMENTS ON ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET FOR THE FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNES GOLF COURSE Dear Ms. Schmitz, Thank you for the opportunity to review the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the Former Mississippi Dunes Golf Course in the City of Cottage Grove. Washington County’s Department of Public Health and Environment and Department of Public Workshavereviewed the EAW and offer the following comments: Section 9 –Land Use Consistent with Washington County's 2040 Comprehensive Plan, Washington County encourages the prioritization of investment in the protection and management of high-quality open spaces such as the Mississippi River frontage open space noted in the EAW. Efforts should be made to preserve, conserve, and restore existing natural resources by implementing sustainable practices to promote biodiversity and healthy ecosystems. Section 10 –Geology, Soils and Topography/Landforms As stated in the EAW, near-surface, highly-weathered limestone bedrock (7-18 feet below surface) and near-surface groundwater features (2-19.5 feet below surface) are present at the project site. Although there are no known karst features at the project site, the previously mentioned site features indicate the potential for groundwater impacts and should be considered and monitored closely during project implementation. Section 11 –Water Resources Recognizing the impacts for increased chloride (Cl) sources through the proposed project, additional analysis is needed related to potential Cl sources and mitigation measures including reducing and preventing Cl contamination of wetlands and other receiving waterbodies. All wells located during project construction shall be sealed according to Minnesota Department of Health regulations to mitigate potential groundwater contamination. 11660 Myeron Road North, Stillwater, Minnesota 55082-9573 Phone: 651-430-4300 • Fax: 651-430-4350 • TTY: 651-430-6246 www.co.washington.mn.us Equal Employment Opportunity / Affirmative Action There are four known Subsurface Sewage Treatment Systems (SSTS) within the project area, there are possibly others. All septic systems, tanks, or components on the property must be identified and properly abandoned. A county permit for septic system abandonment is required and a Minnesota Pollution Control Agency abandonment form must be submitted to the Washington County Department of Public Health and Environment. Section 12 – Contamination/Hazardous Materials/Wastes All solid and hazardous waste, including waste resulting from historic use stock piling of material and/or remnants of the club house that burned down, must be removed from the property, and managed at an appropriately permitted waste disposal facility. A State Superfund project adjacent to the project site was not identified in the Environmental Assessment Worksheet. According to a data search in the "What's in My Neighborhood" interactive map, property east of the redevelopment site now owned by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources was historically used for disposal of wastes from refinery operations, including solid waste, asphalt and barrels containing asphalt, oil emulsion, and calcium carbonate. More information can be found at https://webapp.pca.state.mn.us/wimn/site/190527 The Minnesota Department of Agricultural became aware of high levels of certain heavy metals in golf courses from normal, legal use of certain herbicides and fungicides use. As stated in the EAW, the primary past use of the project area for a golf course included heavy pesticide use to manage the manicured greens and fairways. The potential for contamination should be considered around the boxes, greens and near pesticide mixing, loading and storage areas. More information can be found at https://www.mda.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/inline-files/golfcoursecontamination_1.pdf Section 18 - Transportation The county appreciates the integration of the results of the Southwest Arterial Study and the inclusion rd of the future county arterial located along 103 street throughout the EAW. In terms of how the proposed development will connect to this future county arterial, there are differences between Figure 4 and Figure 5 in the way that the north access location ties into the surrounding transportation system. The county prefers the configuration depicted in Figure 4 as we feel it can accommodate an interim access with a realigned Grey Cloud Island Trail, and be the best long-term design for the future arterial route. When considering the location of this access, please note that sight lines are reduced the farther north it is proposed to be located, and it will be imperative to ensure that sight lines are adequate. The county is interested in learning what any remnant property in the northwest corner of the site is proposed for, and would be interested in any opportunity to access that area for drainage when the future county arterial is built. Alternatively, given the scope of change in drainage patterns associated with the proposed project, Washington County would like to partner on a regional drainage opportunity to accommodate the increased runoff that will be generated by the future county arterial and the proposed development. The inclusion of abundant, high-quality amenities for non-motorized modes of transportation to access the proposed public park assets is critical to the success of this project. The county appreciates the role that the connections between the Mississippi River Trail Bikeway, Central Greenway, and Community Trails will play in establishing those connections, as well as the City Code requirement for eight-foot- wide pedestrian trails on streets with blocks longer than 900-feet. With bicycle and pedestrian facilities proposed for the future arterial route, the county will be interested in an opportunity to review and provide comment on the Concept Plan once it is updated to meet this standard to ensure that adequate, non-motorized public access to the park assets is provided. The results of the coordination between the City and county identified 180 feet of right-of-way to be dedicated with the project. The county is satisfied with that amount of right-of-way and expects it to be dedicated with the project. Thank you again for the opportunity to review the EAW for the Former Mississippi Dunes Golf Course in the City of Cottage Grove. If you have any questions or comments on Washington County’s responses, please contact me at kurt.howard@co.washington.mn.us. Sincerely, Kurt Howard Planner II C: Stephanie Souter, Program Health Supervisor, Washington County Public Health and Environment Mark Riegel, Senior Planner, Washington County Public Health and Environment Sarah Borrell, Senior Environmental Specialist, Washington County Public Health and Environment Wayne Sandberg, County Engineer, Washington County Public Works Lyssa Leitner, Public Works Planning Director, Washington County Public Works Joe Gustafson, Traffic Engineer, Washington County Public Works Frank Ticknor, Design Engineer, Washington County Public Works Kevin Peterson, Engineer III, Washington County Public Works DJUJ\[FOT!DPNNFOUT FOWJSPONFOUBM!BTTFTTNFOU!XPSLTIFFU SFTQPOTF!UP!DPNNFOUT-!GJOEJOHT!!PG!GBDU!BOE!SFDPSE!PG! EFDJTJPO Gpsnfs!Njttjttjqqj!Evoft!Hpmg!Dpvstf Djuz!pg!Dpuubhf!Hspwf-!Njooftpub 1/3/22, 10:28 AMSwanson Haskamp Consulting, LLC Mail - FW: December 20th meeting Goodevening, I'm unable to attend the EAW meeting tomorrow and the letter we recieved advised to submit written comments so here we go. My name is Tyler Biron and I reside at 6500 103rd st s with my wife and 2 daughters. The only house on 103rd st s besides Baileys Nursery. You may know us as the people with the goats. I've been going to and watching videos of the meetings regarding the development of the Dunes since early summer. I find it extremely disappointing we are talking a housing development in this rural, peaceful part of the city. It is so out of place but realize there isnt much we can do about it. My property and my neighbors properties are collateral damage in this whole thing. Do I want 400 houses across the street? Of course not. Where we live is so peacful, quiet and private ...which is why we bought this property.....and this development will forever change that. But it is inevitable. Our option is to sell and move. In Steven Dennis's recent video with the attorney it was said that you welcome input from the effected property owners.....so what I ask is this. Will you PLEASE not allow the medium density housing....which is apartments or townhomes?...proposed on 103rd st s. It would be directly across the road from our property. If we have to accept this development and all the people, noise, lights, etc that are going to come with it could you at least not allow this in the development plan a give my family and a buffer? Thank You. Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android Good afternoon Emily Schmitz, This a comment for the Mississippi Dunes EAW. I'd like to request a record of a decision to each comment outlined below: 1. What is the plan to protect the adjacent SNA plant and animal habitats? Specifically, the rusty patch bumblebee. Does this align with the recommendations with the DNR? 2. The road for the development that will be off of Grey Cloud Trail S seems to keep changing locations, has an environmental impact been down to those residents and the enclosed environment surrounding where these roads will be placed. 3. This project will be within the geographic boundaries of Cottage Grove’s MS4 Permit (MS400082). The permittees Wasteload Allocations (WLA) are assigned by TMDL reduction requirements in the table below. In addition to the MS4 requirements below , the Lake Pepin TMDL will also assign a TP load reduction, but that won’t take effect until 2025 (i think). The EAW makes no mention of the municipal stormwater impacts associated with the NPDES permit or plan to address the increased TP and TSS loading being exported from this project after project completion. The MNLCS states that the current predominant land cover in the project area is currently tall dry grasses, forest, and shrubland landcover, which will most likely be replaced with turfgrass, and impervious surface, which would/could have a higher yield of TP and TSS. 4. Page 6. Section 6. Project Description, Subpart b. “The amount of open space to be included in the area is yet to be determined. Any improvements to publicly dedicated open space will be at the discretion of the governmental organization with ownership of the area and such potential future improvements are outside the scope of this EAW This statement seems ambiguous. If the area is part of the project area, should it also be considered as part of a “complete project”? The project doesn’t recognize any impaired waters within 1-mile of the project boundary, with Moers Lake, Grey Cloud Channel, and Grey Cloud Slough being the only water bodies within 1-mile. While this is technically true when considering the stream line-work distance from the project boundary, these water bodies are hydraulically directly connected to the Mississippi River Main stem, that any impact on these water bodies would be as if having the same impact on the Mississippi River (AUID 07010206-814, Upper St. Anthony Falls to St. Croix R), which is designated as impaired. 5. Although the project boundaries are not within any wellhead protection areas, or Drinking water supply management areas (DWSMAs), there is a large DWSMA and Wellhead protection area that borders the project directly to the north. What is the EAW report and response to that? Thank you, Adam Grams 10655 Grey Cloud Trail S Cottage Grove, MN 55016 There are many new housing developments throughout the City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota. These homes are grand, beautiful, and gigantic, with every amenity a new home buyer ever could wish for, and more. Take a drive through Cottage Grove, travel around, and to see these massive construction projects being built in every part of the city. This is what the powers that be and land speculators want. They are planning for the great and amazing 2040 Future Planning Event, by which date every open plot of land needs to be filled with – no, crammed full of housing. For as it has been gently explained to current residents, the city needs to prepare for and be prepared for the hordes of new homeowners who are just waiting in the wings for these homes to be built. But the time has come when the powers that be and the land speculators have funneled down to developing one of the few remaining and most precious properties. This area is located on the rd former Mississippi Dunes Golf course, near the intersection of 103 and Grey Cloud Trail South, which is a wild, unique, historic, open, and green waterfront property. This long section of the Mississippi and backwaters are part of a migratory birding route, and due to the development of surrounding areas, this property has increasingly become a safe haven and home for many and various species of wildlife. Please accept the invitation to drive around Cottage Grove to see the extensive housing projects and then drive down to this area and examine the location first-hand. It is the entire property that should be protected and preserved as a scenic park and wildlife refuge, and not just a sliver of it. This property should be the entrance to a new south-western Washington County preservation site, extending over and into the current Lower and Upper Grey Cloud Island areas, where aggregate mining is currently removing the gravel and the land. Where the former surface of these islands has been mined and hauled away, these sections of the Lower and Upper Islands are now mere shells of their former selves. Drive by along Grey Cloud Trail South and see. Look down and into the mining site, from the road. These mined island areas look like volcanoes which have erupted. Mined down to perhaps a depth of 100 feet or more, the aggregate from these islands, has been hauled away, leaving these islands with horrific scars. The landscapes have been re-defined with new open areas and even immense and deep lakes, now filled with water. But someday, the mining will end, when there is no more aggregate available or when these sections of the islands have been completely mined away. Even in such a devastated condition, these lands will still make an exceptional park site. Just across the Mississippi from the Mississippi Dunes Golf property and the Lower and Upper Grey Cloud Islands, in Dakota County, is a beautiful and profound park area. Washington County Commissioners could examine this site, work with Dakota County officials, and create a unique and extraordinary park system, perhaps even a new State Park. It could be filled with hiking and biking trails, bird-watching venues, a visitor center, fishing ponds (in the man-made holes, excavated and created through the aggregate mining), areas for wildlife, and picnic areas. This massive property could be an entire park system of outstanding natural beauty. This year one of the books I gifted to loved ones was Profiles in Courage, by President John F. Kennedy. For those who have not enjoyed the pleasure of reading and studying this book, each chapter centers around one hero, facing a dilemma. These chapters focus on a variety of historical eras and events but the true focus is on individual citizens who exhibited bravery, integrity, and courage, in the face of conventional thinking and against all odds. Often these individual citizens stood alone against power and riches. But collectively, what they all had in common was that they stood, at the perfect moment, on the right side of history. They stood on the right side of right, often casting the single vote that made the determining difference in legislative struggles. Unfortunately, in Cottage Grove, among the powers that be, at this moment in time and in history, not even one such individual exists. About 1890, the gentleman known as the “Founder of Itasca State Park” and the “Father of the Minnesota State Park System,” Jacob V. Brower, visited Grey Cloud Island to meet with an early settler, Joseph LaBathe. Born in 1825 at Fort Snelling, Joseph LaBathe was one of the last of those earliest pioneers actually born into the vanishing fur trade business, who grew up knowing many of the Dakota chiefs and personalities (and he was a grandson and a great-grandson of Chief Wabasha I and Wabasha II, and a nephew and a cousin of Grey Cloud Woman I and Grey Cloud Woman II). Often, LaBathe could be heard singing the old French-Canadian songs of the voyageurs, as he paddled in his canoe on the Mississippi. And this was the purpose of Brower’s visit with LaBathe. By 1890, life had changed. The massive forests, and the seemingly never-ending lands were disappearing, becoming just memories. The objective of this meeting was for Brower to hear first-hand of LaBathe’s experiences, of the changes that had come and of those that might be faced in the future. Brower shared his mission, his dream, to protect that small portion the lands surrounding Lake Itasca, a small parcel of that special scenic paradise, for those who would yet be born. After a trip north in 1888, where Jacob Brower had worked as a surveyor to resolve a dispute over the source of the Mississippi, it became Brower’s mission to stop the extensive logging, which he watched, as trees were felled and the land cleared, on land owned by the Friedrich th Weyerhaeuser Companies (Mr. Weyerhaeuser at that time was the 8-richest person in America, with a net worth of $85 Billion, in 2016 US Dollars). It became Brower’s dream and then his mission to promote the protection of the lands surrounding Lake Itasca, so that the trees would be preserved for future generations and posterity. It was an extraordinary dream and mission. So, in 1890 Jacob Brower and Joseph LaBathe met, at LaBathe’s home. Over food, drink, and the enjoyment of clay pipes filled with tobacco, these two gentlemen talked, under the shade of trees, in view of the Mississippi. They spoke of times past and what could be done, just here and there, to preserve small portions of what all of Minnesota had looked like just a few generations before. As a remembrance of their visit, Mr. Brower photographed his new friend, Joseph LaBathe. This photograph is the only known image of Joseph LaBathe. Jacob Brower was determined to save the remaining few pine trees surrounding Lake Itasca, even if it appeared that such an effort was against all odds. But the Minnesota State Legislature brought his bill up to the vote, to establish Itasca State Park, as Minnesota’s first State Park. On th April 20, 1891, and passing by just one vote, this park became Minnesota’s first State Park Jewel. Through the years, the wisdom of that action, proved that it was the right and sensible action. The aroma from the Pines, the mighty forests, a home to vast and various species of wildlife and birds, having the opportunity to see Minnesota’s State Flower in bloom, and even in clusters, the respite provided to visitors through open areas and green space, has proven that conservation of this wild space is and was the superior choice. For generations to come, just as it was at Itasca State Park, choosing preservation of and for this land, is the superior and the right choice. No homes have been built yet. The Better Angels of all of our Natures could work together to protect and preserve this little piece of paradise. It is the right action and the best choice for everyone. No one who has ever visited Itasca State Park, even if only to walk across the Mississippi, at the Headwaters, could imagine life without this park. And that is how those who passionately care enough to protect and preserve the former Mississippi Dunes Golf course, as a park and scenic place, think about this parcel of open land. This property could be the Twin Cities’ Itasca, one that would bring many to this area, to bring joy, happiness, as well as physical and emotional well-being to visitors from Minnesota and beyond. Those who support the development of this property, newly named, the Mississippi Landing, have told those who hope to save and protect the former Mississippi Dunes Golf property that this is privately owned land and that this right should be protected, evidently as an absolute right, and at all costs. It should be remembered that without progressives like Jacob Brower, that there would not be an Itasca State Park or perhaps many or any other State or municipal parks. This entire scenic site should be saved for everyone, and for the future, because it is precious and because it is a necessity. Housing can be and is being built elsewhere. And those residents and supporters of the preservation of this precious site are not opposed to housing developments. Just not here. There is not another parcel like this one, on the waterfront, adjacent to the rare Mississippi Dunes Scientific and nature area, and home to deer, wild turkeys, otters, as many as three species of turtles, opossums, owls, swans, Bald Eagles, and coyotes. Housing development does not do this land justice. When Jacob Brower visited Joseph LaBathe on that lovely sunny and summer day, they could not have imagined that these lands in the extreme south-western corner of Washington County would be in such danger, as this danger is not development but total destruction. When Brower was working to protect and preserve the lands around Lake Itasca, those lands and those trees, and the wildlife and birds that he cared about, were far, far away. That is not the case now. These are lands are right here. This is it. There is no more and once the housing is built, there will be nothing left to save. Once this land is lost, it will be lost forever. Of all of the places in Cottage Grove to develop, couldn’t this one small piece of paradise be preserved for everyone and all of the living things who call this place home? Jacob Brower - Joseph LaBathe, as photographed at LaBathe’s home on Grey Cloud Island, 1890 The photograph of Jacob Brower - Courtesy of the Minnesota Historical Society and the image of Joseph LaBathe, as photographed by Jacob Brower – Courtesy of Alice Robinson, a great- granddaughter of Joseph LaBathe Corinne L. Monjeau-Marz is a resident of Cottage Grove, Minnesota, and is an author and th historian of 19 century Minnesota History. Mississippi Dunes Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) Comments Dated: 12-12-2021 Submitted by: Bonnie Matter 6649 Inskip Avenue South Cottage Grove, MN 55016 Today the Mississippi Dunes’ parcels serve as a buffer and filter for the Mississippi River from the encroaching city of Cottage Grove residential and industrial developments. A master plan has been approved that will change that. With environmental changes rapidly occurring with extreme weather and climate change, this will have a serious impact on not only the Mississippi River and the Mississippi Dunes area but on the entire south side area. The following comments are respectfully submitted and hopefully addressed. Highlights, specific call outs and reference documents before getting into the comments on the EAW starting on Page 3: Railroad - 37 trains per day - Provide times of day; length of trains; tonnage moved per train; potential for increased rail traffic with the 3.5 million square foot NorthPoint Logistics Center BNSF owns railroad tracks that run along the proposed residential development; CP has track usage rights to these same railroad tracks. With the Canadian Pacific-Kansas City Southern (CP-KCS) merger opening up all of North America from Canada to Mexico for the first time, is there the potential for increased railroad traffic in this area? https://futureforfreight.com/ If there is the potential for increased railroad traffic in this area: Noise - impact on homeowners quality of life Vibration - impact on building structures, foundations. Distance between tracks and residential buildings / homes Railroad track fires What’s in those cars? Is it flammable, hazardous? Mitigation plans 1 What standards are followed for railroads in residential developments: See International Railroad Standards - are there standards? Guidelines for New Development in Proximity to Railway Operations https://international-railway-safety-council.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/lulham-guidelines-fo r-new-development-in-proximity-railway-operations.pdf Cottage Grove Industrial site is a great plot of land conveniently located between both CP and BNSF railroad tracks and ideally suited for industrial and commercial businesses. It is a gem for those in warehouses. Not many places available. Reference Materials: MAPS Put the development in context with surroundings; e.g., addition of 3.5 million square foot Logistics Center and railroad tracks Reference: CP-KCSmergereis.com map https://cp-kcsmergereis.com/ - Use the interactive map Use 55071 as the zip code and zoom in. Use the “topographic map base layer”. Can also change base layers to see many different aspects of the site. https://www.arcgis.com/apps/dashboards/665e5f3b1412406ea49454f573aefd35 Note the BNSF and the CP rail lines on either side of the 3.5 million square foot NorthPoint Logistics Center. Note that Mississippi Dunes is clearly marked. This area is going to require rail; doesn’t matter how many roads are built for the 3.5 million square foot logistics center. It won’t be enough for all the semis and truck-trailers and it will hose up other roads and freeways like 61, 494/694. These highways are already congested and do not meet the needs of the existing traffic levels. Rail will be required. No problem with rail. Even more reason why the Mississippi Dunes should not be developed. It should be left as is … as a buffer and a filter. • Water Quality: The City requires that new development projects include BMPs that at a minimum achieve post-development reductions in TP and TSS by 50% and 80%, respectively. Watershed rules call for a TP loading rate of 0.22 lbs./acre/year or existing loading rates, whichever is less, since the project site drains to the Mississippi River. If onsite BMPs, such as infiltration, are not feasible or sufficient to meet the water quality total phosphorus loading rates, the purchase of off-site mitigation credits is an option. Comment : In this development, mitigation should be an absolute requirement! Purchase of offsite mitigation credit is NOT an option. 2 Traffic Study It appears that the traffic study company was not aware of the NorthPoint Logistics Center. Based on past history, the NorthPoint Development group should be able to easily ballpark some numbers for semis, truck-trailers, delivery vans, cars, employees, et al. The NorthPoint Logistics Center will add substantially to the traffic in the area. Traffic flow: Drive south to drive north? Why would semi drivers do that? What is to prevent semis from taking Hadley to Grey Cloud Island Trail (75) and to St. Paul Park and taking 70th Street to Highway 61 heading North. That would be the logical and most efficient route. Why would a semi driver drive 5 miles south out of the way to take the County Road 19 overpass to get on 61 and then head 5 miles to get to 494/694? And need to cross a railroad track risking a delay in wait time for a train? Mississippi Dunes should be left natural to serve as a natural buffer and filter. This development is a mistake. Proposed development is too dense Between the Mississippi Dunes residential development, other recent residential developments, and the addition of the 3.5 million square foot NorthPoint Logistics Center, impervious surfaces have been increased that will create “heat islands” in this area. Structures such as buildings, roads, and other infrastructure absorb and re-emit the sun’s heat more than natural landscapes such as forests and water bodies. Urban areas, where these structures are highly concentrated and greenery is limited, become “islands” of higher temperatures relative to outlying areas. These pockets of heat are referred to as “heat islands.” Heat islands can form under a variety of conditions, including during the day or night, in small or large cities, in suburban areas, in northern or southern climates, and in any season. A review of research studies and data found that in the United States, the heat island effect results in daytime temperatures in urban areas about 1–7°F higher than temperatures in outlying areas and nighttime temperatures about 2–5°F higher. Humid regions (primarily in the eastern United States) and cities with larger and denser populations experience the greatest temperature differences. Research predicts that the heat island effect will strengthen in the future as the structure, spatial extent, and population density of urban areas change and grow. \[ 1\] 3 Please take the opportunity to learn about “heat islands” and read the entire article at: https://www.epa.gov/heatislands/learn-about-heat-islands EAW Comments START here: Item 9. Land Use Page 8, Paragraph 1: Question : Where is this shown on a map in this document. Will 103rd run through from Ideal to Hadley? “As shown on Figure 5 Concept Sketch Plan Grey Cloud Trail South will be realigned on the north edge of the Project Area crossing the northwest corner. The realignment is intended to create a safer access into the Project site and to will eventually upgrade the 103rd Street S corridor to a County Road. Washington County and the City have identified the need to improve east-west connections through the south quarter of the City to ensure road infrastructure is available to support the projected growth and development of this area of the community.” Comment : It appears that there is only one way in and out of this residential development and there is the “potential” for one more - both on the north side of the development - to serve the needs of 499 residences. This does not seem like a very good plan. In an emergency, what is the evacuation plan? Page 14, Paragraph 2 excerpt: “The Master Plan has been developed with extensive feedback from the public, the MnDNR and other key stakeholders.” Comment : The Master Plan has been developed with extensive feedback from the public. Reference Planning Commission Meetings, City Council Meetings public forums, public comment sessions, public workshops, multiple newspaper articles, concerned citizen meetings, change.org, et al. The resident attendance at city meetings against the planned development. Page 14. Table 7: Dunes Project Parcel Zoning AND Figure 5. Concept Sketch Plan AND Figure 7. Zoning Map with MRCCA & FEMA Floodplain Comment : Parcels 3, 5, 2 and 4 - What is the distance (and what is the required distance) between the railroad tracks and the residences. Are there building standards for residences and railroad tracks? Currently 37 trains per day go through this area! Is there the potential for increased rail traffic in the future? What is the potential for fires from rail sparks in hot, dry summers. Page 14. Table 7: Dunes Project Parcel Zoning Comment : Parcel 1: Break Parcel 1 into two distinct parcels; Parcel 1A: River Buffer Park and Parcel 1B: 60’ lots, 50’ lots. State the dimensions. 4 Figure 7. Zoning Map with MRCCA & FEMA Floodplain Question : Assumption: “2 (Exception) refers to SNA property. Please confirm that assumption is correct. If it’s something else, please advise what it is. 9.a.i. Existing land use of the site as well as areas adjacent to and near the site, including parks, trails, prime or unique farmlands. Comment : Add: This development is near railroad tracks and a 3.5 million square foot NorthPoint Logistics Center which will have a major impact on traffic both vehicular and rail and possibly, increased rail traffic. 10. Geology, soils and topography/land forms Comment : Found the timing of this footnote interesting - who knew?: 3 The Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation Report was prepared by Braun Intertec on April 8, 2021. 10.a. “The Project Area’s proximity to the Mississippi River results in varied geological conditions as the grades increase upslope from the river.” Comment : Yes, agreed and it slopes down to the river and takes runoff down with it. 10a. “There are no know active karst are as on site and Figure 14 identifies known locations of active karst near the Project Area. To prevent impacts to possible karst features, the location of stormwater storage or treatment areas should be located in areas with adequate separation to the limestone bedrock. Where this is not possible, mitigation should be implemented including pond liners or other methods that create a barrier between standing water and the limestone formations.” Question : Does this mean the karst areas could become “active” if enough water entered the limestone bedrock? And what kind of pond liners and barriers will be used and how long do they last and what type of impact will they have on that environment? And who is responsible for maintaining the replacement schedule? 10b. “The existing wetland complex as well as a significant portion of the stormwater ponding are located within the Chaska silt loam area to minimize potential karst impacts in other areas of the site. All other soils on site are generally classified as nonhydric.” Question : Sounds like there might be karst impacts in the area. Yes? Or No? (329 - southeast by railroad tracks.) 5 Hydric soil definition = wetland - Question : Where is “329 Chaska silt loam 8.0 acres” on the Figure 5. Concept Sketch Plan Comment : Concern in this section is with increased rainfall and runoff and the ability for the city services to handle over time and/or ability to handle extreme weather events. Mississippi Dunes should remain undeveloped to help mitigate future extreme weather e vents. Impervious surfaces will increase substantially with this development, the 3.5 million square foot NorthPoint logistics center, the roads as well as the additional residential and commercial/industrial traffic that will be generated by both and they all flow down the slope to the river. . 11a. “The Project Area is connected to the Grey Cloud Channel (part of the riverway) to the northwest of the Project Area by the wetland complex that runs through the northern portion of the Project Area. The wetland complex receives water from the Grey Cloud Chanel as well as runoff from the existing golf course. The Project Proposer prepared a Wetland Delineation Report4 and the South Washington Watershed District issued a Notice of Decision that confirmed approximately 8.2 acres of wetlands ion the Project site. “ (Note: Reference Table 8: NRCS Soil Classifications; Dunes Project Parcels; Figure 3. Project Parcels) Questions : Is the referenced 8.2 acres of wetlands Parcels 3 and 5? Is that the High Density Senior Housing Building? Does that make sense? Doesn’t make sense to put concrete slab on a wet area that is subject to freezing in cold climate and, therefore, causing the foundation to crack. “As described in subsection b.ii. of this item, the Project will be required to prepare a SWPPP. The SWPPP must include all additional stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) for discharges to impaired waters since the runoff from the Project Area ultimately drains to the Mississippi River which includes segments on the 303d impaired list. To ensure protection of the receiving water and to meet the City’s ordinance requirements, the stormwater management plan will be developed to meet standards for rate control, water quantity, and water quality. Question : How will the city ensure that runoff (heavy rains, melting snow) from both this development and the 3.5 million square foot NorthPoint Logistics Center et al can be contained during extreme weather conditions and prevent damage to the Mississippi River? This development removes the natural river buffer and filter. Will look forward to seeing a very robust SWPPP and 11.a.ii - The Geotechnical Evaluation Report included 23 test borings in which eight encountered groundwater between 2 feet near the existing wetland complex, and 19.5-feet below ground at the center of the Project Area. Depending on final engineering and grading plans, in areas where the existing geography and relatively shallow depth to groundwater impacts the buildability of a lot, the homes will be constructed with either slab-on-grade or shallow basements where possible. Question : How will those foundations hold up with vibration from the 37 trains passing through daily and the Minnesota freezing and thawing. 6 11.b.i.1. - The Project Area will require a Comprehensive Amendment to amend the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) to allow for the extension of the system into the Project area. Since the Project Area was planned for contiguous expansion post-2040, the City did not include the projected flows within the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. While the proposed timing of development has accelerated, the City planned for the Project Area and adjacent area to be served within the MUSA. Question : Again, this requires context. The city “plan” has changed substantially with the addition of this development and the 3.5 million square foot NorthPoint Logistics Center. This should be a robust plan to ensure that future needs can be handled with allowances for extreme weather conditions. 11.b.ii - Stormwater - Post Construction Conditions The redevelopment of the golf course for single-family residential, senior living and open space uses will be required to meet all stormwater management rules and regulations of the South Washington Watershed District (SWWD) and the City of Cottage Grove. A summary of the City’s ordinance requirements for rate control, water quality treatment a nd volume control are provided: Rate Control: Peak flow rates after development shall not exceed pre-development peak flow rates for the critical 2-year, 10-year, and 100-year recurrence interval precipitation events. The Project site is located within the Southwest Subwatershed (SW-A17, SW-A18, SW-A19 and SW-A20). Three existing ponds are installed within the area identified as SWP17, SW-P18, and SW-P19. The City Surface Water Management Plan requires rate restrictions for sub watersheds SW-A17, SW-A18, SW-A19 so that proposed conditions peak outflow rates not to exceed 0.4 cfs/acre and 33 cfs combined. • Water Quality: The City requires that new development projects include BMPs that at a minimum achieve post-development reductions in TP and TSS by 50% and 80%, respectively. Watershed rules call for a TP loading rate of 0.22 lbs./acre/year or existing loading rates, whichever is less, since the project site drains to the Mississippi River. If onsite BMPs, such as infiltration, are not feasible or sufficient to meet the water quality total phosphorus loading rates, the purchase of off-site mitigation credits is an option. Comment : In this development, mitigation should be an absolute requirement! Purchase of offsite mitigation credit is NOT an option. Figure out how to fix it or don’t do it. 7 • Volume Control: The City requires a uniform volume control treatment equal to 1: of runoff from the net increase in impervious areas. This provision is intended to maintain the annual average existing conditions infiltration capacity of the site. The Project site lies outside of the 10-year Composite Groundwater Capture Zone, so infiltration is allowed by the City unless prohibited by other criteria of the MPCA Stormwater Manual or the Minnesota Department of Health (where precluded by bedrock, depth to groundwater, or other criteria). Where infiltration to fully meet the volume control measure is not desirable or is impossible, an Alternative Sequencing procedure will be applied to achieve compliance. The Project Proposer will use to the maximum extent practical filtration and biofiltration practices, using a clay liner and an underdrain sized to meet the volume control requirement for the site, or use wet sediment basins sized per the standards within the MPCA General Construction Stormwater Permit. If on-site BMP’s are not feasible or sufficient to meet the volume control requirements, the purchase of off-site mitigation credits is an option. Comment : In this development, mitigation should be an absolute requirement! Purchase of offsite mitigation credits is NOT an option. Figure out how to fix it or don’t do it. 8 At a minimum, the developed condition of the Project is required to manage and control rates of stormwater runoff, provide water quality treatment and stormwater volume storage within the Project Area consistent with the ordinance rules established above and the SWWD rules. The stormwater generated onsite due to increased impervious surfaces associated with single-family detached homes, detached townhomes and senior living building, parking, and roadways will be managed through the stormwater infiltration basins constructed as part of the development (see Figure 5 for location). The stormwater system will be designed to manage at least the minimum standards as required through the City’s Ordinance and the SWWD permitting process. Comment : It’s time to stop referring to “minimum standards” . Development is occurring near the Mississippi River. Robust measures should be implemented to ensure that the River is not impacted in a negative way by this development OR the 3.5 million square foot NorthPoint Logistics Center and all it will bring. Question : Are the referenced “stormwater infiltration basins” referenced on Figure 5 the “Delineated Wetlands” called out on the map in the High Density Residential Senior Housing area? If not, advise location of stormwater infiltration basins. 9 A SWPPP must be prepared as part of the NPDES Construction Permit required for the Project. The SWPPP will include all additional stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) as required above. To ensure protection of the receiving water and to meet the City’s ordinance requirements, the stormwater management plan will be developed to meet standards for rate control, quantity and quality as described. During the construction, BMPs must be utilized and will include, but are not limited to: bio-rolls as sediment control along swales, silt fence as down gradient perimeter control, rock entrance and berm to prevent off-site vehicle sediment tracking, inlet protection devices to prevent sediment from entering the storm sewer system, wood-fiber blanket to prevent erosion along slopes, proper restoration in accordance with MPCA regulations, and a seed mix as directed by the City. Additionally, since the Project is located within a karst area the Project Proposer should use and reference the MPCA’s General Stormwater Management Guidelines for Karst Areas.6 A complete list of BMPs will be described in the SWPPP. Question : It is now stated that “the Project is located within a karst area”. Confirmed? This is really not good. Have these people ever experienced a sink hole??? Look forward to a very robust SWPPP Plan. And mitigation plan should something happen where something got “overlooked”. Who is responsible? The homeowner? Not insurable. 11.b.iii Water appropriation The Project will be served by the City’s municipal water supply. The City recently determined through its Water Conservation Plan7 that water demand based on total per capita water use is estimated at approximately 116 gallons per capita per day. Table 11 provides the estimated water supply use based on the unit mix planned for the development. Question : The city’s plan and needs have changed dramatically with this development, the NorthPoint Logistics Center et al. Are the water resources available to handle existing and future needs? 11.b.iv.a. Surface waters The road alignments shown on the Concept Plan are designed to meet safety and access space requirements on 103rd Street S and Grey Cloud Trail. Any disturbed wetland or buffer areas will require a mitigation plan that must be approved by the South Washington Watershed District and any other entity with jurisdiction over the wetland mitigation and replacement plan. Question : What / where is the plan? 10 11.b.iv.b. Surface waters The transition of the Project Area to a residential neighborhood is anticipated to improve how runoff and stormwater is managed on the Project Area. The Project Area is adjacent to the Mississippi River (Grey Cloud Slough) and as shown on the Concept Sketch Plan more than 30 acres will be protected as river buffer and park area. There are no planned changes to the river frontage that will adversely impact this surface water. No grading work or other site alterations are proposed to impact adjacent, nearby or existing surface waters except as noted in (a) above. Comment : Many impervious surfaces are being added - houses, buildings, pavement, roofs, sidewalks, concrete driveways, et al - this will not improve how runoff and stormwater are managed in the Project Area. 15. Visual There are existing residential neighborhoods near the Project Area that may be impacted by light pollution and construction. Site construction is anticipated to occur during daylight hours, and therefore there is no anticipated glare or intense light that will be generated during the site construction process. Post construction, the Project Area will be developed with uses compatible to surrounding suburban development. All proposed lighting shall be required to follow City regulations for light fixture intensity and design. Comment : Determination as to 24/7/365 bright lights generated from the 3.5 million square foot NorthPoint Logistics Center should be considered and mitigated for residents. Quality of life issue. 16. Air 16.a. Stationary Source Emissions There are no industrial or light industrial users or generators of hazardous air pollutants proposed as part of this Project. Comment : There is a 3.5 million square foot NorthPoint Logistics Center and it’s accompanying semis, truck-trailers, delivery vans and cars that will be affecting air quality in the area. There are also 37 trains that run on these tracks daily that will affect air quality. 16.b. Vehicle Emissions The Project will develop a mixed-density residential neighborhood that will generate an increase in carbon monoxide levels due to an increase in passenger vehicle trips to the area beyond the existing golf course use. The Project does not require an indirect source permit. No baseline air quality monitoring or modeling is proposed and no measuresto mitigate for the increase in vehicle related emissions are being considered. Comment : There is a 3.5 million square foot NorthPoint Logistics Center and it’s accompanying semis, truck-trailers, delivery vans and cars that will result in increased vehicle emissions in the area. There are also 37 trains that run on these tracks daily that will have emissions. Comment : Railroads are also notorious for starting fires in the summer. Might want to add that to a mitigation plan. 11 16.c. Dust and Odors - Discuss the effect of dust and odors in the vicinity of the project including nearby sensitive receptors and quality of life. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate the effects of dust and odors. Comment : There is a 3.5 million square foot NorthPoint Logistics Center and it’s accompanying semis, truck-trailers, delivery vans and cars that will be adding dust and odors in the area. There are also 37 trains that run on these tracks daily that will produce dust and odors. Odors from South St. Paul are not uncommon and complaints are heard from residents in Woodbury, Maplewood and Cottage Grove. 17. Noise Describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities, and intensity of noise generated during project construction and operation. Discuss the effect of noise in the vicinity of the project including 1) existing noise levels/sources in the area, 2) nearby sensitive receptors, 3) conformance to state noise standards, and 4) quality of life. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate the effects of noise. Comment : Those who live by rivers know that sound carries - especially in the winter. It’s i nteresting that seniors would be put in buildings next to the railroad tracks. There is a 3.5 million square foot NorthPoint Logistics Center and it’s accompanying semis, truck-trailers, delivery vans and cars that will result in increased noise in the area. There are also 37 trains that run on these tracks daily that will result in noise. If additional trains or railroad spurs into the logistics center are added, there will be increased noise as the cars are humped together. Quality of life would be negatively impacted. Maybe downright miserable. Question : How will this noise be mitigated? List the train schedule times. Provide potential for additional trains or train spurs in the future. How many are anticipated? The logistics center developer will know based on their history. Do the trains only run between certain times? Do the semis, truck-trailers, delivery vans, autos for the logistics center only operate between 7 AM and 7 PM? How will noise levels be mitigated for the residents living in the development? 12 18. Transportation - Streets listed in study include: 1. 103rd Street S & Grey Cloud Trail 2. Hadley Avenue S & 100th Street S 3. 100th Street S & Jamaica Avenue S 4. Hadley Avenue S & 95th Street S 5. Jamaica Avenue S & 95th Street S 6. Grey Cloud Island Drive and Grey Cloud Island Trail 3-way intersection 7. Grey Cloud Island Drive and Grey Cloud Island Trail intersection on the Island S 2 Traffic Solutions, LLC (SSTS) completed a Traffic Impact Study PROJECT NO. 2021_012 dated November 9, 2021, to estimate the trips generated by the Project and evaluate the potential need for transportation or roadway improvements. The complete Traffic Study is included in Appendix C. Comment : Found the street text directional comments interesting. For whatever City planning reasons, many of the streets run north and south and then change via a curve and run east and west. Can be confusing when trying to read directional text. Comments : S2 Traffic Solutions, LLC must have been unaware of the 3.5 million square foot NorthPoint Logistics Center and it’s accompanying semi, truck-trailer, delivery van and car traffic that will dramatically increase the traffic in this area and on these streets. The traffic study provided is not relevant. This traffic study should be redone and updated with relevant estimates that can be provided by the developer of the NorthPoint Logistics Center. Existing and Proposed Parking Spaces Comments : It’s not enough parking. In the winter, cars are not allowed to park on the street in Cottage Grove. And an expectation for one parking spot for the senior building is ridiculous. Some day people will be able to visit each other again. Throw parties. More parking (or less housing) is required. Where are visitors supposed to park? What do residents with two cars do for parking? And with the water tables, it’s certain there will be no underground garage! Will there even be garages for the senior buildings? There is no bus service in this area. Residents will need to have cars to get to the grocery store or the doctor. This is very poorly thought through. 13 Estimated Traffic Generation BIG COMMENT: Again, this traffic study needs to be updated. Hadley, Grey Cloud Trail South, 100th Street, 103rd Street — all of these traffic figures will be dramatically impacted by the NorthPoint Logistics Center semi, truck-trailer, delivery van and car traffic. This will also affect the residential development. It’s also unrealistic to expect that all of these users (including the semis) will drive 5 miles out of the way south to get to the roundabout on Keats (19) and then exit onto 61 and go 5 miles north to get back to where they started and head towards 494/694. They will be taking Hadley to Grey Cloud Trail through St. Paul Park and over to the 70th Street exit. This whole thing is going to be one major problem. And then add to that, sitting at railroad crossings waiting for the trains to move through. This is an accident waiting to happen. Availability of Transit and Alternative Transportation “Since the Project site is not on a fixed-route transit line, the Senior Living Building will be served through Metro Mobility which as on-call service administered by Metropolitan Transit.” Comment : This is an assumption that should not be made. Provide the source for this information. “SSTS analyzed intersection operations using Synchro/Simtraffic, 11th Edition for the 2026 Build out year and for the 2040 Planning Horizon year. There are no improvement projects planned for the study area roadways and none were assumed for the No-Build or Build conditions.” Comment : SSTS should redo the traffic study to incorporate the changes with the NorthPoint Logistics Center traffic estimates. The study provided is out-of-date and not relevant. 18.c. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate project related transportation effects. As mentioned, the traffic analysis considered full build out by 2026 and evaluated conditions in 2026 and 2040. The transportation system serving the area will have sufficient theycapacity to include traffic from the Project as well as other anticipated projects without improvements. Comment : SSTS should redo the traffic study to incorporate the changes with the NorthPoint Logistics Center traffic estimates. The study provided is out-of-date and not relevant. How will the traffic be mitigated for the residents. 19. Cumulative potential effect Comment : A.b.c. There is a 3.5 million square foot NorthPoint Logistics Center and it’s accompanying daily semis, truck-trailers, delivery vans and cars that will impact this area and its residents. There are 37 trains that run on these tracks daily. The tracks are right next to the development. No indication of how this will be mitigated or if there is the potential for increased rail traffic. There are numerous issues identified throughout this feedback/comment to the EAW. Is anyone listening? Looking forward to responses. 14 Comment : Potential fires in the summer around the railroad tracks from train sparks. Comment : At the end of the day, you’re messing with Mother Nature. Wonder who wins? Question : How / when are these comments submitted to the EQB? Please do not hesitate to contact me with additional questions or concerns or clarification. I will be happy to assist. Thank you. Bonnie Matter 15 Hello Emily - Please add the following documents and accompanying referenced attachments to the Mississippi Dunes EAW comments for review by the Cottage Grove City Council Members. Note: Hopefully, the Council Members will re-read the entire study as well as the appendices. Grateful to know that so much of the work was already done. Thank you. Washington County Southwest Arterial Study, November 2020, Appendices Appendix D: Concept Alternatives Appendix E: Environmental Screening Report Appendix F: Summary of Environmental Screening Report Appendix G: Drainage Report Source Path: https://www.co.washington.mn.us/DocumentCenter/View/49518/Southwest-Arterial-Planning-Study-Report-with- Appendices Thank you for all you do. It's appreciated. Bonnie Matter https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=545406ab69&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1720935906234126057&simpl=msg-f%3A1720935906…1/2 P.S. I hope that you had a Merry Christmas. I hope that you have a Happy New Year and that you and your family will stay safe, strong and well. And that we all get to the other side of this pandemic in 2022. Dear Ms. Schmitz, I can only say that I was disappointed by the city's lack of vision for this wonderful river front property. There must be considerable expense involved inextending the potable drinking water supply line and the sanitary sewer system to this somewhat isolated patch of the city. The size of these lots do not seem compatible with the high end homes that will be needed to make this project a success. I am disturbed that significant natural vegetation will be destroyed during the course of this project. This is not what we need during this period of climate change. It seems egregious to me that the 6.8 acres of wooded forest would be destroyed at this point in time. Trees are a tremendous source of carbon storage and we certainly need all the carbon storage available. I think that the city should push for more than the usual number of trees in the neighborhood. I saw several stands of oaks in the nearby Grey Cloud Dunes Scientific and Natural Area. I appreciate the good words that the developer says about using native plants for landscaping. There should, probably, be a city initiative for all home owners to do that. I am very doubtful that I will see any native vegetation if I drive into this area after construction is concluded. Why doesn't the Environmental Assessment address Climate Change impacts? We know that destroying the rainforests is a bad thing to do. Why do we think that disturbing an existing ecosystem in MN has less effect? There should be provisions for the final project to at least be carbon neutral going forward. Grant Tiefenbruck 8989 Jasmine Lane S Cottage Grove, MN 55016 Good Day, Thank you for receiving my comment for the MS Dunes open comment period for the EAW. 1. A request for an EIS based on potential environmental effects, following the four criteria in MN Admin Rules 4410.1700 - Decision for Need for EIS. 2. Address the municipal stormwater impacts associated with the NPDES permit with a plan to address increased TP and TSS loading being exported from this project and after it's completion. The MNLCS states current grasses, forest, etc. willbe replaced with turf grass and impervious surfaces which could increase yield if TP and TSS. 3. Amend: The adjacent waters (Mooers, Grey Cloud Channel and Slough) are hydraulically connected to the Mississippi River Main stem, thus any impact on these waters would directly impact an impaired water body. (Upper St. Anthony Falls to St.Croix River is Impaired). The water within 1 mile of this proposed development should be considered to affect Impaired water. 4. Take into account the protected wellhead area adjacent to this property with further study to assess impact to wells and drinking water of adjacent properties. 5. Define, if possible, the natural area, owned by local government within the EAW, and potentially the EIS. Thank you, Cole W. Williams To whom it may concern, I can't elaborate better than Mr. Christopher Smith's letter regarding the proposed development at the Mississippi Dunes area but wanted to include a personal note. I first visited the area SNA about a decade ago and while the golf course wasn't great to look at it sure is better than what will be there after development. The figure 5 sketch plan in the EAW is awful. Is it a done deal there will be a cheap Pulte housing development there? I just find it incredibly sad that the area will permanently ruined and am extremely disappointed that this development was even approved in the first place. Sincerely, Brett Whaley January 6, 2022 City of Cottage Grove Attn: Emily Schmitz 12800 Ravine Parkway South Cottage Grove,MN 55016 Via email: eschmitz@cottagegrovemn.gov RE: Environmental Assessment Worksheet for Mississippi Dunes Dear Ms. Schmitz, I am an environmental health scientist and the principal of a small environmental consulting firm who has assisted numerous businesses with environmental improvement for the past twelve years. This past year’s heat and drought, wildfires and December tornadoes have brought the climate crisis home to Minnesota. The heat and drought has impacts for humans and wildlife,decimating agriculture and drying up rivers. Tornadoes, in December are unheard of and also wreak substantial havoc for people and wildlife. The fires along the North Shore destroyed habitat for humans and wildlife as well. In addition to the climate crisis, we are facing an extinction crisis. The very basis for human life depends onthe Earth’s biodiversity andecosystem servicesother species provide. Examples include air purification, carbon sequestration, mitigating the urban heat island, nutrient retention, pollination, healthy soil, water cleansing and regulation. The biodiversity of life not only supports these ecosystem services, but also providesbeauty and respite. Andlastly,we are amida two-yearpublic health pandemic. The roots of the pandemic are likely due to human incursion into wildlife areas. As we have learned, failing to adequately consider the ecological and environmental impacts of human activities is at our peril. Please consider these comments to the Mississippi Dunes environmental assessment worksheet(EAW). 4§¤ %!7 ¨² incomplete The Mississippi Dunes EAW fails to consider the greenhouse gas emissions or carbon footprint for the addition of 499 houses and thenear-complete destruction of an almostnatural area. The University of Minnesota’s Department of Soil, 1 Water and Climate wrote mean household carbon emissions are approximately 8.7 tons per year per residence. Using 1 Fissore, C. et al, Carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus fluxes in household ecosystems in the Minneapolis-Saint Paul, Minnesota, urban region, Ecological Applications, 21(3): 619–639, (2011). 1 this benchmark, the 499 homes proposed by Pulte will add another 4342 tons of carbon emissions annually. Whereas a recently completed study from the US Department of Agriculture indicates a locally restored prairie can effectively 2 sequester an average of 1.14 metric tons of carbon per acre per year, indicating protecting and restoring the golf course could benefit the entire community sequestering approximately 228 tons of greenhouse gases per year. In addition to the added greenhouse gas emissions associated with the housing, the EAW estimates an additional daily 3 3953 vehicle trips. MN DOT estimates the average per capita vehicle miles traveled is 12,000 annually. MPCA 4 estimates the average compact/mid-size car emits 9200 pounds of carbon emissions every 12,000 miles. The vehicle trips estimated by the EAW then could result in a further 36,368,000 pounds of carbon into the region. Transportation is the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in Minnesota, yet the extra almost forty million pounds of carbon emissions are not evaluated by the EAW. The research conducted by the Natural Capital project at the University of Minnesota assessed ecosystem services provided by various land uses. They found that “golf courses have larger positive marginal values when evaluated 5 against potential conversion to suburban residential (0.09C increase), urban residential (0.13C increase).” In other words, the proposed project could increase the temperature of the urban heat island by approximately 0.11 degrees Celsius. This is a significant figure when one considers preventing a full-blown climate catastrophe, we are seeking to avoid a 1.5C degree increase in mean global temperature. Golf courses export nitrogen at a mean rate of 5.0 kg/ha/yr. If a golf course is converted to suburban and urban 6 residential developments, nitrogen export is expected to increase by a median of 0.8 and 1.9 kg/ha/yr, respectively. Golf courses \[also\] export phosphorus at a mean rate of 0.18 kg/ha/yr. If converted to suburban or urban residential 7 developments, which would increase phosphorus export by a median of 0.05 and 0.07 kg/ha/yr, respectively. No formal analysis of the increased nitrogen and phosphorus loading to the Mississippi River, a National Scenic River with some impairments has been included in the EAW. The EAW identifies at least twelve rare or significant species within one mile of the project area. This information was gleaned from the MN DNR’s Natural Heritage Information System. The federally endangered Rusty-patch Bumble Bee (RPBB) has been verified at the adjacent Gray Cloud Dunes Scientific and Natural Area. The RPBB does not migrate, but rather the Queens hibernate in shallow burrows. The EAW states, “The Project Area is entirely within a high potential zone of the Rusty-patched Bumble Bee.” The project proposes to grade at least 164 acres that could contain hibernating Queen RPBB. Despite the presence of a number of rare and endangered species within one mile of the project site, no habitat or species surveys have been conducted with the EAW. Pulte Homes’ EAW is incomplete and lacks information regarding climate change related impacts, stormwater pollution and surveys for rare and endangered species. These matters have the potential for significant environmental impacts. Surveying for the RPBB would not be possible at this time of year, so a 30-day postponement does not apply in this case (MR 4410.1700, subp.2). 2 Markland, T., Carbon Balance and Evapotranspiration Rates of a Restored Prairie and a Conventional Corn/Soybean Rotation, University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/206697, (2019). 3 MN DOT, Vehicle Miles Traveled trend report, 2018. 4 MPCA, Vehicles and Equipment, https://www.pca.state.mn.us/air/vehicles-and-equipment. 5 Lonsdorf, E., et al, Assessing urban ecosystem services provided by green infrastructure: Golf courses in the Minneapolis-St. Paul metro area, Landscape Urban Planning, April 2021. 6 Ibid. 7 Ibid. 2 Additionally, upon information and belief, MPCA has issued five water quality violations to Pulte Homes that must be investigated. For these reasons, we request apositive declaration for anEnvironmental Impact Statement and the above impacts be included in the scope of the EIS. Please acknowledge receipt of these comments and provide notification as to when the city council willmake a determination on the need for an EIS. Thank you for your kind attention to these concerns. Sincerely, Catherine Zimmer, MS, BSMT 3 !QVCMJD!IFBSJOH!UFTUJNPOZ!'!DPNNFOUT FOWJSPONFOUBM!BTTFTTNFOU!XPSLTIFFU SFTQPOTF!UP!DPNNFOUT-!GJOEJOHT!!PG!GBDU!BOE!SFDPSE!PG! EFDJTJPO Gpsnfs!Njttjttjqqj!Evoft!Hpmg!Dpvstf Djuz!pg!Dpuubhf!Hspwf-!Njooftpub Matter, Bonnie City of Cottage Grove Planning Commission December 20, 2021 A meeting of the Planning Commission was held at Cottage Grove City Hall, 12800 Ravine Park- way South, Cottage Grove, Minnesota, on Monday, December 20, 2021, in the Council Chamber and telecast on Local Government Cable Channel 16. Call to Order Chair Fraziercalled the Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Roll Call Members Present: Ken Brittain, Jessica Fisher, Evan Frazier, Eric Knable, Derek Rasmussen Members Absent: Jerret Wright Staff Present: Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator; Christine Costello, Community Development Director; Mike Mrosla, Senior Planner; Emily Schmitz, Senior Planner; Zac Dockter, Parks and Recreation Director; Ryan Burfeind, Public Works Director/City Engineer; Amanda Meyer, Assistant City Engineer; Steve Dennis, Council Member Approval of Agenda Brittainmade amotion to approve the agenda. Fisherseconded.The motion was approved unanimously (5-to-0 vote). Open Forum Frazier opened the open forum andasked if anyone wished to address the Planning Commission on any non-agenda item. No one addressed the Commission. Frazier closed the open forum. Chair’s Explanation of the Public Hearing Process Frazier explained the purpose of the Planning Commission, which serves in an advisory capacity to the City Council, and that the City Council makes all final decisions. In addition, he explained the process of conducting a public hearing and requested that any person wishing to speak should go to the microphone and state their full name and address for the public record. Public Hearings and Applications 6.1 Mississippi Dunes EAW - Case EAW2021-077 Pulte Homes has appliedfor an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for development of land guided Transition Area, which is generally located at the former Mississippi Dunes Golf Course site south of 103rd Street and north of the Mississippi River. Planning Commission Minutes December 20, 2021 Page 2 of 4 Schmitz introduced Jane Kansier, a Senior Planner with Bolton & Menk, who summarized the EAW process, timeline, purpose, and EAW content. Kansier stated the Council will discuss this on January 19. Tonight there is a public hearing; comments will be compiled and responses will be generated and provided to the City Council and included in the Record of Decision. No responses to questions or comments are required this evening, and no action of the Planning Commission is specifically required. Schmitz stated she’d try to answer any questions from the public. Frazier stated speakers will have three minutes to provide their comments. Comments in writing can be addressed to Senior Planner Emily Schmitz, whose email can be found on the City’s webpage, cottagegrovemn.gov; the comment period is open until Thursday, January 6, 2022. Frazier opened the public hearing. Bonnie Matter, 6649 Inskip Avenue South, asked questions and made statements: 1. Did the Planning Commission Members read the public comments that were submitted regarding the EAW? 2. There are 37 daily trains that run by the proposed development. Missing from the EAW was information like the distance between the tracks and the residences in the development. Negative impact on the residents’ quality of life due to: Noise pollution; Diesel engine smells and air quality; Train vibrations; Structural damage to houses due to foundation and settling issues; Potential grass fires in dry, hot summers from sparks; Train schedules: Morning, afternoon, evening, night, all the time, when do they run; Train loads: How big, how much, what’s on them, any hazardous materials. How would increased future rail traffic impact future residents; what are the mitigation plans for these issues? 3. The substantial increase in impervious surfaces from rooftops to roads; what’s the mitigation plan? 4. Building a senior apartment building on a slab foundation on wetlands; slabs will freeze and thaw and crack. Vibration from trains will exacerbate the problems; what’s the mitigation plan? 5. There’s a Section 11B to stormwater about water quality and volume control; it says the developer indicates that if they cannot meet the requirements, the purchase of off-site mitigation credits is an option. In a sensitive critical area, mitigation should be an absolute requirement. There should be no purchase of off-site mitigation credits. Where would a statement like this ever be considered for the type of area under review? 6. Traffic study does not reflect the development’s future traffic load with industrial development going into the east. 7. There is only one way in and out of the development. There is a “potential” for one more outlet. What if all those homes had to be evacuated? How do the residents all get out at one time with one outlet; 369 single-family homes, 130 senior units, anda multifamily building? 8. Please request a copy of my EAW comments and review the many issues with the EAW. If you’re going to allow the development to move forward, then you must help protect both the Mississippi River and future homeowners in that development. This is only a portion of what she submitted. Planning Commission Minutes December 20, 2021 Page 3 of 4 Sharon O’Boyle, 9300 Grey Cloud Trail South, Grey Cloud Island Township, stated she read the whole thing, both the EAW and the historical description of the house, which she found really interesting since she lived in the house on the corner of Mississippi Dunes until she was eight years old. Her Grandma O’Boyle owned the land before it was sold to become Mississippi Dunes Golf Course. After reading the historical part, one of the questions was about if there’d been anything to meet guidelines if there’d been any important person living there. She didn’t know if this would count, but her Grandma O’Boyle was the first woman to be a Postmistress in St. Paul Park; she things that rates as something important and is of historical value. She noticed with the EAW that they addressed the endangered species that have been seen in that area, on the property, and if you put 500 units on that land, you’re going to lose the endangered species. So, she thinks development is fine, but not on that property, and she’s said that all along. You have a chance to include it with the SNA, along with the Grey Cloud Island Regional Park; make it one whole thing, whether that be the State, with the DNR, or in combination with the City, like we have with the Grey Cloud Island Regional Park, as that’s a combination of entities that put that together. The other thing that she noticed in the EAW is the fact that the land is sand; the EAW says that all of that sand would have to be removed for there to be any housing put in. To her, that’s a red flag; if you have to remove that much soil, it’s not a good place to put a development with the fact that you’re going to have to use sump pumps because it’s in a flood plain. The other thing she thought about was she had worked at Pullman Elementary with the Rainbow Kids Club many years ago. Where are all the children going to go? She’s heard from residents in Cottage Grove that Pullman is at capacity, so if you’ve got 500 homes, you’re going to have to build another school. That doesn’t make any sense either. After reading it, they’re saying it’s going to be two people per household; to her, it seems like they’re minimizing. Based on two people per household, that’s an additional 125,000+ gallons of water per day, about 136,000+ gallons of sewage per day, and 4,000 extra cars on the road. So, choose wisely. Frazier stated that there were two emails and a handwritten letter that were provided to staff prior to the meeting; those will be included as written public comments for this hearing so those will also go to the City Council for their review. No one else spoke. Frazier closed the public hearing. Fisher stated in response to Ms. O’Boyle’s comments about Pullman Elementary, she’s on the PTA at Pullman Elementary. She understands that this new development, along with the new development going in already just south of Mississippi Dunes, is Pullman. Pullman is not at capacity, so she just wanted to make sure that was in the public comment. She serves on the PTA, and is also involved in class sizes, as she’s on another School District committee; this is not really the place to discuss the District, but there have been new schools built very recently that are not at all at capacity. She thinks the School District is doing a good job working with the City in anticipating our population growth and being able to support those children in the schools. Approval of Planning Commission Minutes of November 22, 2021 Rasmussen made a motion to approve the minutes of the November 22, 2021Planning Commission meeting. Knable seconded. Motion passed unanimously (5-to-0 vote). Reports Planning Commission Minutes December 20, 2021 Page 4 of 4 8.1 Recap of December 2021 City Council Meetings Costello provided a summary of actions taken at the City Councilmeetings in December. December 1: Council approved the Harkness Apartments final plat and development agreement; the Mississippi Dunes Master Plan was also approved. December 15: The Mississippi River Critical Corridor Ordinance Amendment was approved; NorthPoint Development was approved, so they’ll move forward with making application for their first phase. Council Member Dennis wished each of the commissioners and their families a wonderful Christmas week and all holidays celebrated this time of year. As always, we appreciate very much the work the commissioners do for the City. 8.2 Response to Planning Commission Inquiries None 8.3 Planning Commission Requests None Adjournment Brittainmade a motion to adjourn the meeting. Fisher seconded. Motion passed unanimously 5-to-0 vote). The meeting was adjourned at 7:27 p.m. BUUBDINFOU!3/!JNQBJSFE!XBUFST!NBQ FOWJSPONFOUBM!BTTFTTNFOU!XPSLTIFFU SFTQPOTF!UP!DPNNFOUT-!GJOEJOHT!!PG!GBDU!BOE!SFDPSE!PG! EFDJTJPO Gpsnfs!Njttjttjqqj!Evoft!Hpmg!Dpvstf Djuz!pg!Dpuubhf!Hspwf-!Njooftpub Impaired Waters 2020 - MPCA Impaired Waters Viewer Project Site Delisted waters Delisted lakes Delisted streams Impaired waters Impaired lakes Impaired lakes partially within reservations Impaired lakes wholly within reservations Impaired streams Impaired streams partially within reservations Impaired streams wholly within reservations Impaired wetlands 2020 impaired waters list, based on 2018 water quality assessments. This service is used by the MPCA's Impaired Waters Viewer. Esri, NASA, NGA, USGS, FEMA | County of Dakota, Metropolitan Council, MetroGIS, Esri Canada, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, INCREMENT P, METI/NASA, USGS, EPA, NPS, US Census Bureau, USDA BUUBDINFOU!4/!SFWJTFE!USBGGJD!TUVEZ FOWJSPONFOUBM!BTTFTTNFOU!XPSLTIFFU SFTQPOTF!UP!DPNNFOUT-!GJOEJOHT!!PG!GBDU!BOE!SFDPSE!PG! EFDJTJPO Gpsnfs!Njttjttjqqj!Evoft!Hpmg!Dpvstf Djuz!pg!Dpuubhf!Hspwf-!Njooftpub DUNES RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY in Cottage Grove, MN January 11, 2021 Dunes Cottage Grove, MN TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY PROJECT NO. 2021_012 January 11, 2022 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota: Vernon E. Swing, P.E. Date: ______1-11-2022____________Lic. No.:_____41417____ TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FORMER MISSISSIPPI DUNESPROPERTY COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA January 11, 2022 Prepared For: Pulte Homes Prepared By: 2 STraffic Solutions, LLC 4290 Norwood Lane North Plymouth, MN 55442 612-968-4142 Project No. 2021_012 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 1 II.EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS4 A. Data Collection 4 B. Roadway Description 4 III. NO-BUILD ALTERNATIVE 9 A. Background Growth 9 B. Anticipated Improvements for No-Build Conditions 9 C. Results of Analysis 9 IV. BUILD ALTERNATIVE 12 A. Site-Generated Traffic 12 B. Trip Distribution and Assignment 12 C. Build Traffic Volumes 15 D. Intersection Operational Analysis Description 15 E. Results of Analysis 18 F. 2040 Operations 20 V. SUMMARY AND SUGGESTIONS 23 LIST OF TABLES Table Page Number 1. Trip Generation 12 2. 2026 No-Build Operations 18 3. 2026 Build Operations 19 4. 2040 No-Build Operations 20 5. 2040 Build Operations 21 6. 2040 Build Operations for Hadley Avenue S Residential 22 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page Number 1. Vicinity Map 2 2. Site Plan 3 3. Existing Geometrics and Traffic Control 7 4. Existing Traffic Volumes 8 5. 2026 No-Build AM and PM Peak Traffic 10 6. 2040 No-Build AM and PM Peak Traffic 11 7. Trip Distribution & Trip Assignment 14 8. 2026 Build AM and PM Peak Traffic 16 9. 2040 Build AM and PM Peak Traffic 17 Exhibit 1 23 TECHNICAL APPENDICES (Available upon Request) A. TRAFFIC COUNTS B.TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS C. RESULTS OF OPERATIONAL ANALYSES I. INTRODUCTION Pulte Homes proposes to redevelop the Mississippi Dunes Golf Course site of approximately 164-acres as a single family detached residential homes development plus a senior attached residential building referred to as the Dunes. The project will consist of a maximum of 369 single-family homes and 130 senior attached units. For the purposes of this study, it is anticipated that construction will be complete, and the facilities fully occupied by 2026. rd The proposed site is located to the south of 103 Street S and to the east of Grey Cloud Trail S and is bordered on the south by Mooers Lake. The site location is illustrated on Figure 1, "Vicinity Map". Direct access to the site is proposed via two locations both originating from Grey Cloud Trail S and progressing th southeastward into the site. Indirect access is available from Jamaica Avenue S, Hadley Avenue S, 95 thrd Avenue S, and 100 Street S via the intersection of 103 Street S with Grey Cloud Trail S. Indirect access is also available from Grey Cloud Island Drive S via both the northern and southern intersections with Grey Cloud Trail S. The location of the direct accesses is illustrated on the Concept Site Plan, Figure 2. The purpose of this study is to support the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) completed for the subject development, particularly to evaluate the impact of traffic generated by the proposed development on the operations and safety of the adjacent roadway network. The study focuses on the roads and intersections that provide direct and indirect access into the site. This study details the existing and future roadway conditions at studied intersections and includes traffic volumes, lane geometrics and traffic operational analysis results. Recommendations regarding roadway improvements to accommodate site generated traffic, as well as the anticipated growth in background traffic are included as necessary. Traffic Impact Study Page 1 S2 Traffic Solutions November 9, 2021 Revised: January 11, 2022 Traffic Impact Study Page 2 S2 Traffic Solutions November 9, 2021 Revised: January 11, 2022 Traffic Impact Study Page 3 S2 Traffic Solutions November 9, 2021 Revised: January 11, 2022 I. Existing Conditions A. Data Collection The existing conditions of the nearby roadway system were documented by a field inventory conducted during the week of September 8, 2021. The purpose was to identify features that affect roadway capacity, including traffic control, sight distances, turn lanes, speed limits, etc. In addition, turning movement traffic counts were conducted revealing the AM Peak hour occurs at 7:30 – 8:30 AM and the PM Peak hour at 4:00 PM – 5:00 PM at the following intersections: 103rd Street S & Grey Cloud Trail Hadley Avenue S & 100th Street S 100th Street S & Jamaica Avenue S Hadley Avenue S & 95th Street S Jamaica Avenue S & 95th Street S Grey Cloud Island Drive and Grey Cloud Island Trail 3-way intersection Grey Cloud Island Drive and Grey Cloud Island Trail intersection on the Island Figure 3 illustrates the study area, the existing geometrics, and the traffic control, and Figure 4 shows the existing AM and PM Peak hour turning movement counts. Also, the 2019 average daily traffic volumes in the study area as published by MnDOT are included on Figure 4. It is noted, Covid-19 has affected the travel patterns during peak times. Current patterns in the Twin Cities suggest the total daily traffic volumes are at levels similar to pre-Covid conditions, but the AM peak is much less intense, and the PM peak is occurring earlier with less volume but is lasting longer. The volumes in this report have not been adjusted to reflect pre-Covid conditions. B. Roadway Descriptions The existing geometrics of the Study Area Roadway Network have been documented based on a field review. The discussion that follows details specific items such as lane layout, roadway classifications, and turn lane storage lengths. Traffic Impact Study Page 4 S2 Traffic Solutions November 9, 2021 Revised: January 11, 2022 Jamaica Avenue S, runs generally north/south to the east of the site. It is a City of Cottage Grove Minnesota State Aid (MSA) road and is functionally classified as an A Minor Expander. In the th study area, it is a 4-lane road, undivided to the south of 95 Street S, and divided to the north with th designated left right turn lanes at intersection with 95Street S. It provides indirect access to the thrd site via the intersection with 100Street S and subsequently 103 Street S. It is signed for 45 mph, and has an urban cross-section. Hadley Avenue S, runs generally north-south to the east of the site. It is a City of Cottage Grove MSA road and is functionally classified as a Major Collector. In the study area, it is a two lane road with right and left turn lanes provided at major intersections. Hadley Avenue S provides indirect thrd access to the site via the intersection with 100 Street S and subsequently 103 Street S. It is signed for 40 mph and has an urban cross-section. th 95 Street S, runs generally east-west to the northeast of the site. It is a City of Cottage Grove MSA road and is functionally classified as a Major Collector. In the study area, it is generally a 4- th lane road. 95 Street S provides indirect access to the site via the intersection with Hadley Avenue rd S and subsequently 103 Street S. It is signed for 45 mph and has an urban cross-section th 100 Street S, generally runs in an east-west direction to the east of the site. It is a City of Cottage Grove (MSA) road and is functionally classified as a Major Collector/Other Arterial, and in the future it is planned as an A-Minor Expander. In the vicinity of the site, it is a 2-lane undivided road with dedicated right turn lanes and left turn by-pass lanes at major intersections. It provides indirect rd access to the site via its connection to 103 Street S. It is signed for 50 mph and generally has an urban cross-section. Traffic Impact Study Page 5 S2 Traffic Solutions November 9, 2021 Revised: January 11, 2022 rd 103Street S, generally runs in an east-west direction to the north of the site. It is a City of Cottage Grove MSA roadway and is functionally classified as a Major Collector. It provides indirect access to the site via its intersection with Grey Cloud Trail S, is a 2-lane facility and is signed for 40 mph. Grey Cloud Trail S, runs generally north-south adjacent to the site. It is a Cottage Grove MSA roadway and is functionally classified as a Major Collector. It provides direct access to the site via two new intersections. Grey Cloud Trail S is a 2-lane undivided facility, is signed for 40-mph, and currently has a rural cross-section. Grey Cloud Island Dr S, runs generally north/south to the west of the site. It is a City of Cottage Grove Local Street. In the vicinity of the site, it is a 2-lane undivided and it provides indirect access to the site via its intersections with Grey Cloud Trail S. It is signed for 35 mph and has a rural cross-section. As mentioned above, the existing geometric conditions at the study area intersections have been reviewed rd and are summarized on Figure 3. It is noted, 103 Street S passes under an active rail line just to the east of Grey Cloud Trail S. This underpass is stop controlled on both approaches as the roadway curvature and width of the underpass will not accommodate more than one oversized vehicle at a time. Traffic Impact Study Page 6 S2 Traffic Solutions November 9, 2021 Revised: January 11, 2022 Traffic Impact Study Page 7 S2 Traffic Solutions November 9, 2021 Revised: January 11, 2022 Traffic Impact Study Page 8 S2 Traffic Solutions November 9, 2021 Revised: January 11, 2022 III. NO-BUILD ALTERNATIVE To address the impacts of a development on the surrounding roadway system, it is necessary to predict the traffic that would be present on the roadway system at the time (the design year) of completion of the proposed development, without the inclusion of the proposed development. This is considered the No- Build scenario, and serves as a basis with which to compare Build scenarios. In this study two design years were analyzed 2026, the year after the development is fully built and occupied, and 2040, the current planning year horizon. A. Background Growth Review of the latest City of Cottage Grove Comprehensive Transportation Plan indicates the traffic in the area is expected to increase. The City’s Comprehensive Plan indicates traffic will grow by approximately 1.3 percent per year between now and 2040. This rate is likely conservative as ITE and the Transportation Research Board suggest traffic patterns will permanently change due to the impact of COVID-19 with fewer home to work and work to home trips likely to occur in the future. Figures 5 and 6 illustrate the anticipated 2026 and 2040 No-Build peak hour traffic volumes. B. Anticipated Improvements for No-Build Conditions There are no programmed improvements identified for the roadways surrounding the site. For the purposes of this study it is assumed that the current roadway condition will remain as is. C. Results of Analysis The study area intersections identified in Section II were analyzed for the 2026 and 2040 No-Build scenarios. Complete discussion of the results of these analyses is provided in Section IV, where a comparison with corresponding design year Build alternatives are made. Traffic Impact Study Page 9 S2 Traffic Solutions November 9, 2021 Revised: January 11, 2022 Traffic Impact Study Page 10 S2 Traffic Solutions November 9, 2021 Revised: January 11, 2022 Traffic Impact Study Page 11 S2 Traffic Solutions November 9, 2021 Revised: January 11, 2022 IV. BUILD ALTERNATIVE A. Site-Generated Traffic The number of vehicle trips generated by the maximum 369 single family homes and 130 Unit Senior Attached Residences to be developed as part of the Dunes residential development were estimated for the th weekday daily, and AM and PM traffic peak hours using the data and methodologies contained in the 10 Edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The proposed development will include single-family homes corresponding to ITE Land Use Code 210 and senior attached residential units corresponding to ITE Land Use Code 252. Table 1 summarizes the trip generation estimates. Table 1 Trip Generation Trips Generated Land Land Use Use Size AM peak PM Peak Weekday ADT Code Enter Exit EnterExit Single Family 210 369 Homes67 200 224 1323456 Housing Senior Attached 252 130 Units 9 17 18 15 497 Units 76 217 242 147 Totals 3953 293 389 th 1.Per the data and methodologies in Trip Generation, 10Edition, published by ITE. B. Trip Distribution and Assignment The distribution of site-generated traffic from and to the adjacent street system was based on existing traffic patterns in the area and on travel time forecasts recorded during the peak traffic times using google maps. Figure 7, titled "Trip Distribution and Trip Assignment," depicts the distribution of the estimated site- generated traffic entering and exiting the study area roadway network, with 100 percent destined to/from the north. This traffic is then distributed accordingly, with 15 percent utilizing the Hadley Avenue and TH 61 interchange, 84 percent utilizing the Jamaica Avenue S and TH 61 interchange (with 20 percent diverting Traffic Impact Study Page 12 S2 Traffic Solutions November 9, 2021 Revised: January 11, 2022 th to95Street S when the traffic light is red or when visiting retail on the way home) and 1 percent utilizing Grey Cloud Trail. Site-generated traffic was assigned to the network accordingly and is also illustrated on Figure 7. (It is noted the volume of traffic turning left into the northern access may benefit from the installation of a left turn lane as traffic on Grey Cloud Trail S increases in the future. However, this study did not include a dedicated left turn lane at this access in the analysis.) Traffic Impact Study Page 13 S2 Traffic Solutions November 9, 2021 Revised: January 11, 2022 Traffic Impact Study Page 14 S2 Traffic Solutions November 9, 2021 Revised: January 11, 2022 C.Build Traffic Volumes When combined, the site-generated traffic volumes and No-Build scenario traffic volumes result in the Build scenario traffic volumes, shown on Figures 8 and 9 for the 2026 and 2040 design years, respectively. D. Intersection Operational Analysis Description The operating conditions of transportation facilities, such as roadways, traffic signals and stop-controlled intersections, are evaluated based on the relationship of the theoretical capacity of a facility to the actual traffic volume on that facility. Various factors affect capacity including travel speed, roadway geometry, grade, number of travel lanes, and intersection control. The current standards for evaluating capacity and th operating conditions are contained in the 6Edition of Highway Capacity Manual, published by the Transportation Research Board. The procedures describe operating conditions in terms of driver delay represented as a Level of Service (LOS). Operations are given letter designations with "A" representing the best operating conditions and "F" representing the worst. Generally, level of service “D” represents the threshold for acceptable overall intersection operating conditions during a peak hour. The Chart below summarizes the level of service and delay criteria for signalized and unsignalized intersections. Signalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection LOS Designation Average Delay/Vehicle (Sec.) Average Delay/Vehicle (Sec.) A<10 < 10 B > 10-20 > 10-15 C> 20-35> 15-25 D> 35-55 > 25-35 E> 55-80> 35-50 F > 80 > 50 A final fundamental component of operational analyses is a study of vehicular queuing, or the line of vehicles waiting to pass through an intersection. An intersection can operate with an acceptable Level of Service, but if queues from the intersection extend back to block entrances to turn lanes or accesses to adjacent land uses, unsafe operating conditions could result. In this report, the Industry Design Standard 95th percentile queue length is used. The 95th Percentile Queue Length refers to that length of vehicle queue that has only a five-percent probability of occurring during an analysis hour. Traffic Impact Study Page 15 S2 Traffic Solutions November 9, 2021 Revised: January 11, 2022 Traffic Impact Study Page 16 S2 Traffic Solutions November 9, 2021 Revised: January 11, 2022 Traffic Impact Study Page 17 S2 Traffic Solutions November 9, 2021 Revised: January 11, 2022 E. Results of Analysis th This section contains the results of the intersection operational analyses based on Synchro/Simtraffic, 11 Edition, and provides recommendations, as necessary to mitigate the impacts. It is noted, the reported results are from the aggregate of 10 SimTraffic simulations which use a random number generator to seed the network with vehicles. These results reflect dynamic conditions and a more accurate than the results of the static analysis reported by Synchro, however, due to random number generator can sometimes show slightly better results on minor movements under higher traffic conditions when the intersections are operating at very good LOS. Table 2 summarize the results of the operational analyses for the 2026 No Build scenario (assumes 1.0 percent annual growth in traffic from existing conditions). Table 2 2026 No-Build Operations Overall/Worst Movement LOS & Delay (sec) th Intersection Notes/95 Percentile Q AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Grey Cloud Island Dr S & Grey EB Q is 30 ft in AM; a (1.1)/a ebl (3.4) a (1.5)/a ebl (3.6) Cloud Trail S (south) EB Q is 37 ft in PM WB Q is 36 ft in AM; rd 103Street S & Grey Cloud Trail S a (1.1)/a wbl (4.0) a (1.4)/a wbl (3.8) WB Q is 37 ft in PM WB Q is 39 ft in AM; th 100 Street S & Hadley Avenue S a (1.1)/a wbl (3.2) a (1.5)/a wbl (5.8) WB Q is 51 ft in PM NB Q is 37 ft in AM; th 95Street S & Hadley Avenue S a (4.3)/a wbl (7.1) a (4.8)/a wbl (7.5) SB Q is 42 ft in PM Grey Cloud Island Dr S & Grey -NA - ; a (1.0)/a ebr (2.5) a (1.1)/a ebr (2.9) Cloud Trail S (north)EBR Q is 13 ft in PM EBLQ is 133 ft in AM; th 95 Street S & Jamaica Avenue S A (6.2)/C EBT (25.7) A (9.7)/C WBT (30.2) EBL Q is 173 ft in PM SBR Q is 214ft in AM; th 100 Street S & Jamaica Avenue S a (8.6)/c wbt (16.8) b (11.4)/d sbl (32.0) SBR Q is 242 ft in PM 1. Overall Level of Service reported from SimTraffic delay, first letter represents intersection LOS, while second letter represents worst LOS of individual approach. Upper case letters indicate signalized intersection, lower-case letters indicate unsignalized intersection, and italic letters signify roundabouts th 2. 95 percentile queues are a result from an average of 10 SimTraffic simulations. The results shown in Table 2 indicate all intersections and worst movements are expected to operate at acceptable LOS in 2026 without the proposed project. Further, the results indicate all intersections will Traffic Impact Study Page 18 S2 Traffic Solutions November 9, 2021 Revised: January 11, 2022 experience manageable vehicle queues. No intersection modifications are suggested for the 2026 No-Build condition. Table 3 summarizes the operational analyses results for the 2026 Build conditions. Table 3 2026 Build Operations Overall/Worst Movement LOS & Delay (sec) th Intersection Notes/95 Percentile Q AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Grey Cloud Island Dr S & Grey EB Q is 28 ft in AM; a (1.0)/a ebl (3.5) a (1.2)/a ebl (3.5) Cloud Trail S (south)EB Q is 35ft in PM WB Q is 51 ft in AM; rd 103Street S & Grey Cloud Trail S a (1.7)/a wbl (4.3) a (4.6)/a wbl (7.8) WB Q is 83 ft in PM WB Q is 49 ft in AM; th 100 Street S & Hadley Avenue S a (2.5)/a wbl (6.9) a (4.1)/b wbl (11.4) WB Q is 90 ft in PM NB Q is 47 ft in AM; th 95Street S & Hadley Avenue S a (4.7)/a wbl (7.6) a (6.3)/b wbl (10.7) WB Q is 69 ft in PM Grey Cloud Island Dr S & Grey EBR Q is 13 ft in AM; a (0.9)/a ebr (1.6) a (1.2)/a ebr (2.9) Cloud Trail S (north)EBR Q is 15 ft in PM EBL Q is 135 ft in AM; th 95 Street S & Jamaica Avenue S A (6.9)/C EBL (20.3) B (10.1)/D WBL(38.9) EBL Q is 167ft in PM SBR Q is 246 ft in AM; th 100 Street S & Jamaica Avenue S b (11.5)/c sbr (18.3) a (4.8)/b sbl (10.1) SBR Q is 62ft in PM WBR Q is 66 ft in AM; North Access & Grey Cloud Trail S a (2.6)/a wbr (3.9) a (2.3)/a sbl (3.2) WBR Q is 53ft in PM WBR Q is 49 ft in AM; South Access & Grey Cloud Trail S a (2.2)/a wbr (2.9) a (1.9)/a wbr (2.7) WBR Q is 44 is PM 1. Overall Level of Service reported from SimTraffic delay, first letter represents intersection LOS, while second letter represents worst LOS of individual approach. Upper case letters indicate signalized intersection, lower-case letters indicate unsignalized intersection, and italic letters signify roundabouts th 2. 95 percentile queues are a result from an average of 10 SimTraffic simulations. The results shown in Table 3 indicate all intersections and worst movements are expected to operate at acceptable LOS in 2026 with the proposed project. Further, the results indicate all intersections will experience manageable vehicle queues. It is noted the project will have a negligible impact on the operations of the Grey Cloud Island Dr S and Grey Cloud Trail S intersections. (Again, when the operations of the intersection and critical movements are at LOS A, the random number generator can sometimes show slightly better delay or queuing results on minor movements even with higher traffic volume conditions.) Traffic Impact Study Page 19 S2 Traffic Solutions November 9, 2021 Revised: January 11, 2022 F.2040 Operations The long-range planning horizon year is 2040, as mentioned in the No-Build section. The results of the analysis of the 2040 No-Build traffic conditions, which continue to reflect a 1.3 percent annual growth rate, assume the roadways surrounding the site have the current configuration. Table 4 summarizes the 2040 No-Build operations at the study area intersections. Table 4 2040 No-Build Operations Overall/Worst Movement LOS & Delay (sec) th Intersection Notes/95 Percentile Q AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Grey Cloud Island Dr S & Grey EB Q is 33 ft in AM; a (0.9)/a ebl (3.9) a (1.3)/a ebl (3.6) Cloud Trail S (south) EB Q is 37 ft in PM rd 103 Street S & Grey Cloud Trail WB Q is 38 ft in AM; a (1.0)/a wbl (3.3) a (1.6)/a wbl (3.9) S WB Q is 43 ft in PM WB Q is 39 ft in AM; th 100 Street S & Hadley Avenue S a (1.2)/a wbl (4.6) a (1.3)/a wbl (5.5) WB Q is 45 ft in PM NB Q is 57 ft in AM; th 95Street S & Hadley Avenue S a (5.2)/a wbr (5.2) a (6.0)/a wbl (10.0) SB Q is 65 ft in PM Grey Cloud Island Dr S & Grey -NA - ; a (0.8)/a ebr (2.6) a (1.1)/a ebr (3.3) Cloud Trail S (north) EBR Q is 9 ft in PM EBL Q is 128 ft in AM; th 95 Street S & Jamaica Avenue S A (7.1)/B EBL (17.6) B (12.4)/C EBL (22.0) EBL Q is 220 ft in PM th 100 Street S & Jamaica Avenue EBL Q is 33 ft in AM; a (2.5)/a sbl (5.2) a (2.7)/a sbl (5.1) S SBR Q is 44 ft in PM 1. Overall Level of Service reported from SimTraffic delay, first letter represents intersection LOS, while second letter represents worst LOS of individual approach. Upper case letters indicate signalized intersection, lower-case letters indicate unsignalized intersection, and italic letters signify roundabouts th 2. 95 percentile queues are a result from an average of 10 SimTraffic simulations. The results shown in Table 4 indicate all intersections and worst movements are expected to operate at acceptable LOS in 2040 without the proposed project. Further, the results indicate all intersections will experience manageable vehicle queues. (Again, when the operations of the intersection and critical movements are at LOS A, the random number generator can sometimes result in slightly better delay or queuing results on minor movements even with higher traffic volume conditions.) Table 5 summarizes the results of the 2040 Build traffic operational analysis, assuming no improvements or mitigation. Traffic Impact Study Page 20 S2 Traffic Solutions November 9, 2021 Revised: January 11, 2022 Table 5 2040 Build Operations Overall/Worst Movement LOS & Delay (sec) th IntersectionNotes/95Percentile Q AM Peak HourPM Peak Hour Grey Cloud Island Dr S & Grey EB Q is 22 ft in AM; a (0.8)/a ebl (3.2) a (1.5)/a ebl (3.9) Cloud Trail S (south)EB Q is 36 ft in PM rd 103Street S & Grey Cloud Trail WB Q is 31 ft in AM; a (1.4)/a wbl (3.9) a (4.4)/a wbl (7.7) SWB Q is 85 ft in PM WB Q is 54 ft in AM; th 100 Street S & Hadley Avenue S a (2.0)/a wbl (4.2) a (3.8)/b wbl (10.1) WB Q is 95 ft in PM NB Q is 53 ft in AM; th 95Street S & Hadley Avenue S a (4.5)/a wbl (7.9) a (6.0)/a wbl (8.9) WB Q is 55 ft in PM Grey Cloud Island Dr S & Grey NA; a (1.0)/a ebr (1.3) a (0.9)/a ebr (2.5) Cloud Trail S (north) NA EBL Q is 143 ft in AM; th 95 Street S & Jamaica Avenue S A (8.5)/B EBL (19.0) B (11.9)/D WBL(36.5) EBL Q is 196 ft in PM th 100 Street S & Jamaica Avenue EBL Q is 42 ft in AM; a (3.3)/a sbl (6.3) a (5.4)/a sbl (7.9) S SBR Q is 68 ft in PM WBR Q is 63 ft in AM; North Access & Grey Cloud Trail S a (2.2)/a wbr (3.6) a (2.4)/a sbl (3.0) WBR Q is 47 ft in PM WBR Q is 32 ft in AM; South Access & Grey Cloud Trail S a (1.6)/wbr (3.0) a (2.0)/a wbr (2.0) WBR Q is 52 ft in PM 1. Overall Level of Service reported from SimTraffic delay, first letter represents intersection LOS, while second letter represents worst LOS of individual approach. Upper case letters indicate signalized intersection, lower-case letters indicate unsignalized intersection, and italic letters signify roundabouts th 2. 95 percentile queues are a result from an average of 10 SimTraffic simulations The results shown in Table 5 indicate all intersections are expected to operate at acceptable overall LOS in 2040 with the proposed project. Further, the results indicate all intersections will experience short to moderate vehicle queues, which are typical for peak hour conditions. As with the 2026 Build conditions, the project will have a negligible impact on the operations of the Grey Cloud Island Dr S and Grey Cloud Trail S intersections. (Again, when the operations of the intersection and critical movements are at LOS A, the random number generator can sometimes result in slightly better delay or queuing results on minor movements even with higher traffic conditions.) In addition to the forecast conditions at the study area intersections identified earlier in this document, two other areas were reviewed for the 2040 AM and PM Build conditions to determine if the project will result in unacceptable operations. The two areas are the railroad underpass intersection, and the Hadley Avenue Traffic Impact Study Page 21 S2 Traffic Solutions November 9, 2021 Revised: January 11, 2022 ththrd S intersections with90Street S and 85Street S. As mentioned in the existing conditions section, 103 Street S passes under an active rail line and the approach lanes for each direction of the underpass are controlled with stop signs. This treatment is in place to protect oversized vehicles such as semi-trucks which cannot navigate through the underpass without encroaching into the opposing lane of traffic. It is rd noted, this project will straighten the 103Street S underpass, however, the opening will remain narrow likely making it difficult for two oversized vehicles to pass simultaneously. The operation analysis of the 2040 AM and PM Build conditions indicate the intersection and worst movement will operate at LOS A th for both peak periods with the longest 95percentile queue estimate to be 90 feet for westbound traffic during the PM peak. That said, with the anticipated increase in traffic associated with the proposed project, it is suggested that advanced warning signs with flashers be installed to alert drivers to the unusual traffic control conditions. th The 2040 Build AM and PM peak hour traffic operations at the Hadley Avenue S intersections with 90 th Street S and 85 Street S were also analyzed using Synchro/SimTraffic Software. These intersections are all-way stop control with share left through and right movements occurring from one lane on all approaches. The volumes used in the analysis are derived from existing ADT. Exhibit 1 summarizes the 2040 Build peak hour traffic conditions at the two intersections. The results of the analyses indicate the intersection and worst movement operations for both intersections will not significantly change with the addition of traffic from the proposed project. Table 6 summarizes the results for the 2040 Build conditions. Table 6 2040 Build Operations for Hadley Avenue S Residential Intersections Overall/Worst Movement LOS & Delay (sec) th Intersection Notes/95 Percentile Q AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour NB Q is 97 ft in AM; th 90Street S & Hadley Avenue S a (6.6)/a nbt (7.7) a (7.2)/a nbt (8.2) NB Q is 113 ft in PM NB Q is 92 ft in AM; th 85Street S & Hadley Avenue S a (6.8)/a wbl (7.7) a (7.6)/a sbt (8.0) SB Q is 95 ft in PM 1. Overall Level of Service reported from SimTraffic delay, first letter represents intersection LOS, while second letter represents worst LOS of individual approach. Upper case letters indicate signalized intersection, lower-case letters indicate unsignalized intersection, and italic letters signify roundabouts th 2. 95 percentile queues are a result from an average of 10 SimTraffic simulations Traffic Impact Study Page 22 S2 Traffic Solutions November 9, 2021 Revised: January 11, 2022 Exhibit 1 –2040 Build Traffic Volumes at Hadley St Intersections Traffic Impact StudyPage 23 S2Traffic SolutionsNovember 9, 2021Revised: January11, 2022 V. SUMMARY AND SUGGESTIONS The preceding analysis has evaluated the potential traffic impacts of the proposed development of the Pulte Homes single family and attached senior apartment residential project, Dunes, on the operations of the study area intersections. The site is located adjacent to the east side of Grey Cloud Trail S and south side rd of 103 Street S, just north of Mooers Lake in Cottage Grove, Minnesota. Two design years were considered in this study, 2026 to correspond to the year after build-out and 2040 to remain consistent with the long range planning horizon. For both design years a No-Build and Build scenario, was analyzed and compared to assess the development’s impact, and the area’s future infrastructure needs. Development of the Dunes residential project on the former Mississippi Dunes Golf Course site by 2026 is expected to result in approximately 3,953 new vehicle trips on the study area roadway network per average weekday. Peak hour trips generated by the development are estimated at 293 during the AM peak hour and 389 during the PM peak hour. The site access will include the construction of two new intersection on Grey Cloud Trail S, to the south of rd 103 Street S. Growth in background traffic at a rate of 1.3 percent per year was accounted for in the analysis. Results of the operational analyses in the 2026 and 2040 No-Build and 2026 and 2040 Build scenarios indicate all the intersections will operate at acceptable levels of service with typical Peak Hour short to moderate vehicle rd queues. It is suggested that the current stop sign control of the 103 Street S underpass be augment with advanced warning flashers to alert the driver of an unusual traffic control treatment. While not warranted at this time, it may be beneficial to include a dedicated left turn lane for Grey Cloud Trail into site at the northern access intersection. No other improvements to the roadways or intersections within the study area are required. Traffic Impact Study Page 24 S2 Traffic Solutions November 9, 2021 Revised: January 11, 2022 BUUBDINFOU!5/!OFX!IJTUPSZ!SFQPSU!PO! XJMMJBN!DPXBO0IFSC!GSJU\[!IPVTF FOWJSPONFOUBM!BTTFTTNFOU!XPSLTIFFU SFTQPOTF!UP!DPNNFOUT-!GJOEJOHT!!PG!GBDU!BOE!SFDPSE!PG! EFDJTJPO Gpsnfs!Njttjttjqqj!Evoft!Hpmg!Dpvstf Djuz!pg!Dpuubhf!Hspwf-!Njooftpub IJTUPSJDBM!FWBMVBUJPO 21412!Hsfz!Dmpve!Usbjm-!Dpuubhf!Hspwf Opwfncfs3132 686:UITUSFFUTF-TUF326}NJOOFBQPMJT-NO!!66525}723/954/5251}OFXIJTUPSZ/DPN Historical Evaluation 10301 Grey Cloud Trail Cottage Grove, Minnesota 55016 Prepared for: City of Cottage Grove 12800 Ravine Pkwy South Cottage Grove, MN 55016 By: New History 575 Ninth Street Southeast, Suite 215 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414 (612) 843-4140 www.newhistory.com For questions and comments: Lauren Anderson, anderson@newhistory.com Meghan Elliott, elliott@newhistory.com (612) 843-4140 ©2021 New History UBCMF!PG!DPOUFOUT! Executive Summary1 Site History 2 Historic Context 2 10301 Grey Cloud Trail 5 City of Cottage Grove Local Designation 11 Past Determinations of Historic Significance11 Designation Criteria11 Integrity 12 National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) Designation12 Sources Consulted 14 Appendix A: Current Photos 1 FYFDVUJWF!TVNNBSZ This report summarizes our historical research on the 10301 Grey Cloud Trail property in Cottage Grove. The purpose of our research was to provide additional information on the history of the site. We have also provided our preliminary recommendations and professional opinion on the property’s ability to qualify for local landmark and National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) designation. Site History: The current site features a house and barn on 2.75 acres of land. The house was likely constructed between 1850 and 1886. The associated barn was constructed at an unknown date, but it is possible that it dates to the same time period. From the time of its construction until the mid-1900s, the property was associated with dozens of acres of surrounding farm land. For most of its history, the house appears to have primarily operated as a single-family residence for individuals and/or families who farmed the surrounding acreage. Past Determinations of Historic Significance: The property is not currently locally designated as a historic site. A 1990 survey of Cottage Grove recommended the property for additional research and local designation. The property is not currently listed on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Local Landmark Designation: For a property to be locally designated by the City of Cottage Grove, it must demonstrate historical significance by meeting at least one of the City’s five criteria for designation and retain integrity (the physical materials and features that were present during the time when the property achieved historical significance). Based on our research, we believe that the property meets Criterion 1 for its association with Cottage Grove’s history as a rural, agricultural community. Additionally, the property likely meets Criterion 4 as a unique local example of limestone building construction. The building has experienced several alterations since its construction, which may impact its integrity. National Register of Historic Places Designation: For a property to be listed on the National Register, it must demonstrate historic significance by meeting at least one of the National Park Service’s Criteria for Evaluation and retain integrity. Based on our research, additional information is needed to assess the property’s eligibility for the National Register. Alterations to integrity may pose a challenge to NRHP listing. 1 TJUFIJTUPSZ IJTUPSJD!DPOUFYU! 10301 Grey Cloud Trail is located in the southwest corner of thecity of Cottage Grovein Section 30 of Township 27 North, Range 21 West. Historically, the house and barn on this property were surrounded by and associated with dozens of acres of farmland, and they are best understood within the context of the agricultural history of Cottage Grove. This section presents a brief summary of this agricultural history followed by an in-depth discussion of the history of the property itself. The City of Cottage Grove is located between the Mississippi and St. CroixRivers in an area historically known as the St. Croix Triangle (modern-day Washington and Ramsey Figure 1.1847 plat mapof Township 27 North, Range 21 West. Section 30 is highlighted in red. Map courtesy of United States Bureau of Land Management and Counties). Most of the land theMinnesota General Land Office. within the boundaries of modern-day Cottage Groveis located in Township 27 (see Figure 1). Township 27 was first surveyed in 1847when the St. Croix Triangle was claimed by the United States government as part 1 of Wisconsin Territory. The area was subsequentlyincorporated into Minnesota Territoryin 1849. The first Euro-American settler in the Cottage Grove area was likely James Sullivan Norris, who staked his claimto a portion of Section 12of Township 27 in 1843. Norris was followed by 1th George W. Jones, “Township No. 27N, Range No. 21 West 7Mer.,” March 15, 1848, United States Bureau of Land Management, GeneralLand Office Historic Plat Map Retrieval System, https://www.mngeo.state.mn.us/glo/index.html; Robert Vogel, The New England of the West: A Survey of Historic Properties Associated with Early American Settlement in Cottage Grove (City of Cottage Grove, September 1990), 12; Robert Vogel, Cottage Grove History: A Palimpset (Advisory Committee on Historic Preservation, City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota, 1997), 2 –3. 2 other Euro-Americansmostly from New England states,such as New York, Maine, Vermont, and New Hampshire.According to historian Robert Vogel, “by C M & SP 1855,Cottage Grove was one of the fastest-growing rural townships in Minnesota, with schools, churches, a lyceum hall, and perhaps twenty or thirty 2 farms.”The township of CB & Q Cottage Grove was officially organized in May of 1858, days afterMinnesota achieved 3 statehood. Cottage Grove’s earliest settlers were largely subsistence farmers who cultivated spring 4 wheat or potatoes as cash crops. By 1871, concentrated settlement within thetownship was limited totwo small villages –East Cottage Grove in Section Figure 2.1886plat map of the Cottage Grove area showing theChicago, Milwaukee, and St. Paul Railroad(C M & St P) and the Chicago, Burlington and 12, near the northeast corner of Quincy (C B & Q) Railroads. Location of Section 30 indicated in red. Map courtesy of the township, and Langdonin the University of Minnesota’s UMedia. Section 21,near the center of the township. Cottage Grovewas originally connected to river towns along the Mississippi River and St. Croix River via wagon roads. The township received its first railroad line in 1869 when the St. Paul and Chicago Railroad (later the Chicago, Milwaukee, and St. Paul Railroador C M & SP) constructed a station at Langdon(see Figure 2). The Chicago, Burlington, and Quincy (CB & Q) 2 Vogel, Cottage Grove History, 2 –3; Duane D. Fisher, “The Development of Cottage Grove, The First Rural Settlement in Minnesota,” term paper (Macalaster College, 1954), 5; Robert C. Vogel, “Historic Houses of Cottage Grove: A Field Guide,” Perspectives in Cottage Grove History, no. 1 (February 1986), “A Brief History of Cottage Grove,” on file at the Minnesota Historical Society, St. Paul, Minnesota; Robert Vogel, Preliminary Inventory of Pre- 1940 Houses in the City of Cottage Grove, (Prepared for the City of Cottage Grove Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission and the Advisory Committee on Historic Preservation, September 1988), 9. 3 Edward D. Neill, A History of Washington County and the St. Croix Valley: Including the Explorers and Pioneers of Minnesota (Minneapolis, MN: Northstar Publishing Company, 1881), 328. 4 Vogel, The New England of the West, 10 –12. 3 was extended through the township in the late 1880s, passing along the southwest edge of Cottage 5 Grove Township to connect Prescott, Wisconsin to St. Paul (see Figure 2). During the early 1860s, the Civil War created an increased demand for grain and livestock. This demand, combined with the arrival of the railroads and innovations in farm machinery, shifted the focus of agricultural production in Cottage Grove from subsistence farming to commercial agriculture. Throughout Washington County, the number of farms and the amount of acreage under cultivation increased. Concurrently, Cottage Grove experienced a second wave of immigration, including newcomers from Germany, Scandinavia, England, and Ireland. Until about 1880, agricultural production focused on wheat, which was sold and shipped to other locations. During the late 1800s, farmers expanded beyond wheat into feed grains (such as corn and oats), 6 raising livestock, and dairy farming. Demand for agricultural products remained strong through the first World War, benefitting Cottage Grove farmers. However, increased agricultural production during this time period led to a decrease in farmland value in the 1920s. This was followed by the Great Depression of the 1930s, which brought economic challenges for farmers. According to Vogel, the result of this period of economic strain was that farming “became less of a way of life and more a highly competitive 7 In the years following World War II, the business, with fewer farmers producing more goods.” number of Washington County farms decreased, and the average farm size became larger. Agriculture continued as Cottage Grove’s primary economic driver until into the 1950s, when the community began to develop into a residential suburb. Between 1958 and 1960 alone, 1,200 houses were constructed in the township. Cottage Grove grew rapidly, with 800 residents in 1950, 5,000 residents in 1960, 14,300 residents in 1970, and a population of 25,000 in 1995. The Village of 8 Though the city has evolved Cottage Grove was incorporated in 1965; it became a city in 1974. substantially from its nineteenth century origins, it still retains a considerable amount of land within 9 its borders that is zoned for agricultural and rural residential uses. 5 Robert Vogel, A History of Washington County: Gateway to Minnesota History (Stillwater, MN: Washington County Historical Society, 2008), 231 – 232; Andrew J. Schmidt, Daniel Pratt, Andrea Vermeer, and Betsy Bradley, Railroads in Minnesota, 1862 – 1956, Multiple Property Documentation Form, 2013, Section E, page 51; Neill, A History of Washington County and the St. Croix Valley, 336, 372; Vogel, Cottage Grove History, 3 – 6. 6 Vogel, The New England of the West, 12 - 13; Carole Zellie, Washington County Historic Contexts (prepared for Washington County Land Management, 1999), 165; Vogel, “Historic Houses of Cottage Grove,” 3. 7 Vogel, The New England of the West, 24; Zellie, Washington County Historic Contexts, 167. 8 Vogel, “Historic Houses of Cottage Grove,” 5; Robert Vogel, Cottage Grove History, 5; Willard E. Rosenfelt, Washington: A History of the Minnesota County (Stillwater, MN: Croixside Press, 1977), 244; MetroCouncil, “Cottage Grove: Suburban Edge Where Urban Meets Farmland and Open Space,” July 17, 2017, https://metrocouncil.org/News-Events/Communities/Newsletters/Cottage-Grove-Suburban-edge-where-urban- meets-far.aspx. 9 City of Cottage Grove, “Cottage Grove 2016 Zoning Map,” June 13, 2016, https://listingsprod.blob.core.windows.net/ourlistings-usa/fc2443b4-28bc-40f6-9d13-a4f09a816bcc/b8b4f092- f528-40e2-985b-cb191fc16a0a. 4 21412!Hsfz!Dmpve!Usbjm This broader history of Cottage Grove is reflected in the history of 10301 Grey Cloud Trail. Today, the property NWNE addressed at 10301 Grey Cloud Trail includes a house and barn on 2.75 acres of land in the northeast quarter of Section 30 of Township 27. For most of its history, however, the property has comprised a SWSE small portion of much larger parcels of farm 10 land. The earliest recorded owner of the northeastquarter of Section 30 was NW NE Alexander Fell, a private in theSixth Regiment of the United States Infantry. Fell received 160 acres of land –the northeast and northwestquarters of Section 30 and SE SW the southeastand southwestquarters of Section 19 (see Figure 2) –under the Scrip Warrant Act of 1850, which providedfree Figure 3.1850 land grant and current parcel boundaries. Red land to United States military veterans. As dashed lines indicate section and quarter boundaries. Background was common practice for recipients of these map courtesy of Washington County. grants, Fell granted or sold his rights to this 11 land to Jeremiah Lamb, who filed a claim for the property with the General Land Office in 1854. More research is necessary to determine the property’s earliest owners with certainty. However, Washington County property records suggest that the south half of the northeast quarter 12 of Section 30 was owned by a succession of at least threeindividualsbetween 1854 and1864.These included William B. Dibble, Louis \[Lewis\] Dibble, and Peter Pfiefer. According to ahistory of the St. Croix River Valleywritten in 1881, William Burris Dibble wasone of the early Euro-American settlersof Washington County. Born in New York in 1815, Dibble moved toMarine Mills (11 miles north of current day Stillwater)by 1838. Around 1845, Dibble moved to Point Douglas in Denmark Townshipto the east of Cottage Grove. Dibble’s first wife, Eliza, died in 1847, and Dibble remarried 10 Washington County Property Information, https://maps.co.washington.mn.us/wcgis/. 11 Military Warrant, accession number MW-0759-034, March 3, 1854, General Land Office, https://glorecords.blm.gov/details/patent/default.aspx?accession=0759- 034&docClass=MW&sid=jq5vpuvb.sfl#patentDetailsTabIndex=1; James W. Oberly, “Military Bounty Land Warrants in the United States, 1847-1900,” February 17, 1992, ICPSR, https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09514.v1 12 The completion of a chain of title for the property was beyond the scope of this research. More research is necessary to confirm early ownership of the property. See tract pages for the northeast quarter of Section 30, Township 27, Range 21, on file at the Washington County Property Records and Taxpayer Services, Stillwater, MN. 5 Mary Ann Wright in 1853. Dibble appears to have continued to farm in Point Douglas until his death in 1883. It is unclear why Dibble acquired land in Cottage Grove Township. Given his brief 13 ownership of the property, the land may have been a speculative investment. The next owner of the property, Louis (or Lewis) Dibble, is listed in the 1857 Minnesota Territorial Census as a resident of Point Douglas. By 1860, Louis was living in Cottage Grove and considered farming his primary occupation. As Louis was also from New York, he may have been related to William. At the time of 14 the 1860 census, Louis and his wife Hannah had five children. Little is known about Peter Pfiefer; research did not reveal any definitive information about this individual. The next owner of the property, William Cowan, appears to have acquired the land from Peter Pfiefer in 1873. By 1886, a plat map of Cottage Grove indicates that Cowan owned 247 acres in Section 30, including the 2.75 acres that now comprise the 10301 Grey Cloud Trail property. Cowan is listed as a resident of Cottage Grove in both the 1875 and 1885 Minnesota Territorial Censuses. Cowan, who was 56 years old at the time of the 1875 census, was a native of Scotland. His wife Harriet (45 years old in 1875) was born in Canada, while two younger household members – Hannah (18) and Harriet (14) – were also born in Scotland. By 1885, three individuals named John 15 (28), Anna (26), and Harriet (23) were residing with William and Harriet. The 1886 plat map of Cottage Grove shows a structure on Cowan’s property in the location of the current house, just to the east of the road that is now Grey Cloud Trail and west of the tracks of the CB & Q Railroad (see Figure 4). Possibly, this structure is the existing two-and-one-half- story, gable-roofed, limestone house. No historic photographs of the property have been uncovered. Based on its existing appearance, the house was not designed as high-style architecture. Rather, like most of the pre-1940 houses in Cottage Grove, it is best classified as “folk” or “vernacular” 13 Minnesota State Population Census Schedules, 1875, Washington County, Denmark Township, family 117, accessed via Ancestry.com; United States Bureau of the Census, Tenth Census of the United States, Minnesota, Washington County, Denmark Township, dwelling no. 213; “William B. Dibble,” Minnesota, U.S., Marriages Index, 1849-1950, ancestry.com; “William Burris Dibble,” Find a Grave Index, 1600s-Current, Ancestry.com; “Marine Mills,” Minnesota Historical Society, accessed November 18, 2021, https://www.mnhs.org/media/kits/marinemill; Neill, A History of Washington County and the St. Croix Valley, 193, 260, 326, 354 – 361, 477. 14 Vogel, The New England of the West, 54; United States Bureau of the Census, Eighth Census of the United States, 1860, Washington County, Cottage Grove, dwelling no. 1376, Ancestry.com; Minnesota Territorial Census, 1857, Washington County, Cottage Grove, dwelling no. 634, Ancestry.com. 15 Tract pages for northeast quarter of Section 30, Township 27, Range 21, on file at the Washington County Property Records and Taxpayer Services Department, Stillwater, Minnesota; Minnesota State Population Census Schedules, 1865-1905, 1875, Washington County, Cottage Grove, family no. 124, Ancestry.com; Minnesota State Population Census Schedules, 1865-1905, 1885, Minnesota, Washington County, Cottage Grove, family no. 91, Ancestry.com; Warner and Foote, Map of Ramsey and Washington Counties: with Adjacent Portions of Anoka, Dakota & Hennepin counties, Minnesota, and Parts of St. Croix & Pierce Counties, Minnesota (Minneapolis, MN: Warner and Foote, 1886), Sheet 7. 6 architecture. The house’s limestone walls are now covered with stucco (installed in the 1960s or 1970s) but were originally exposed. This limestone may have been obtained from one of several locallimestone quarrieshistorically present within Cottage Grove. Vogel notes that the house at 10301 Grey Cloud Trail is one of only a few buildings in Cottage Grove constructed completely of this materialand the only one of thecity’s 140 housesbuilt before 1940 that is 16 not constructed of wood.Though not an example of high-style architecture, the building’sfront gabledform reflects a common subtype of theGreek Revival style, which was popular in the United Figure 4. 1886 plat map of the Cottage Grove area showing Section 30.Map courtesy of the University of Minnesota’s UMedia. States from about 1825 until about 1860.According to a description of the housein a 1990 architectural-history survey, it formerly had a front entry portico, another 17 feature of Greek Revival houses.Like the house, the existing barn cannot be dated with certainty. However, a 1990 study of barns in Cottage Grove found that the oldest are generally simple gable- roofed structures like this one, suggesting that the barn was likely constructed in the nineteenth 18 century. By 1901, William Cowan had sold much of his land, retaining only19.25 acres to the west of modern-day Grey Cloud Trail. The new owner of most of Cowan’s former land (200.95 acres) was 16 Vogel, Preliminary Inventory of Pre-1940 Houses, 181; Robert Vogel, “Minnesota Historic Properties Inventory Form,” WA-CGC-034, Okey House, 1984, on file at the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office, St. Paul, Minnesota; Vogel, The New England of the West, 53. 17 Vogel, Preliminary Inventory of Pre-1940 Houses, 180, 183; Virginia McAlester, A Field Guide to American Houses, rev. ed (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2014), 134 –136. 18 Larry Klueh, “Barns in the City: Agrarian Landmarks in Cottage Grove,” Perspectives in Cottage Grove History, No. 4 (August 1989), 6; Vogel, Preliminary Inventory ofPre-1940 Houses, 11 –12. 7 19 listed as the Security Trust Company(see Figure 5).Little is known about this firm. Preliminary newspaper research suggests that it was based in St. Pauland specialized in 20 backing mortgages and bonds. The next available plat map of Cottage Grove, dated 1912, showsDorothea Fritz as the owner of these 200.95 acres(see Figure 6). Fritz, who immigrated from Germany in 1888, was married to Minnesotanative Herbert Casper Fritz.According to the 1910 federal census, farming wasHerbert’s primary occupation.Though the 1912 plat map does not show the location of residential Figure 5. 1901 plat map of Cottage Grove structures, census information indicates that the Fritz family showing Section 30.Map courtesy of Minnesota owned a mortgaged farm, indicatingthat there were still Digital Library. buildings on the Fritz propertyat this date. At the time of the 1910 census, the family had a three-year-old daughter Dorothea, a two-year-old son Anthony, and an infant named Herbert. A hired laborer, Lanis Perow, also lived with the family.Another daughter, Clara, was born to the 21 couple in 1912. The elder Dorothea died in 1916, and her property was distributed to her children and husband. By 1926, 76.95 acressurrounding the 10301 Grey Cloud Trail property wereowned by “DorotheaFritz et. al.,” presumably, the younger Dorothea and her siblings(see Figure 6. 1912 plat map of Cottage Grove 22 Figure 7). showing Section 30.Map courtesy of Minnesota Digital Library. 19 Northwest Publishing Company, Plat Book of Washington County, Minnesota (Minneapolis, MN: Northwest Publishing Company, 1901), Sheet 41. 20 See for example “Notice of Mortgage Sale,” St. Paul Globe, January 18, 1885, p. 7; “Money Has Been Paid for Bonds,” Bemidji Daily Pioneer, June 24, 1909, p. 1. 21 The Farmer,The Farmer’s Atlas and Directory of Washington County, Minnesota (St. Paul, MN: Webb Publishing Company, 1912), Sheet 27; United States Bureau of the Census, Thirteenth Census of the United States, 1910, Minnesota, Washington County, Cottage Grove Township, District 0166, Sheet 7B, accessed via Ancestry.com; United States Bureau of the Census, Fourteenth Census of the United States, 1920,Minnesota, Washington County, Cottage Grove Township, District 0169, Sheet 6A, accessed via Ancestry.com 22 Samuel Larson and George Tibbets, “Inventory and Appraisement in the Matter of the Estate of Dorothea Fritz,” February 20, 1917, and “Final Decree of Distribution in the Matter of the Estate of Dorothea Fritz,” June 18, 1917, Probate Case File No. 4358-4395, 1916 –1917, accessed via Ancestry.com; Hudson Map Company, 1926 Plat Map of Washington County; “Dorothea Fritz,” Find a Grave Index, 1600s-Current, Ancestry.com. 8 By 1938, these 76.95 acres had passed to Otto J. Radusch(see Figure 8). Otto is not listed in the 1940 census for Washington County, so little is known about his background. Accordingto a 1990 historical architecture survey of the property, the house’sone-story addition dates to 1942, so it is possible that this addition was constructed 23 The next available plat map, dated 1949, by Radusch. shows Anthony and Mary Kulvich as the owners. By1956, the property had passed to Mary O’Boyle(see Figure 10). Little information could be uncovered about either of these 24 occupants. Figure 7. 1926 plat map of Cottage Grove During the mid-twentieth century,Section 30 did not showing Section 30. Map courtesy of the University of Minnesota’s John R. Borchert Map experience immediate subdivision and residential Library. developmentas did some other areas ofCottage Grove. A 1964 aerial photograph indicates that this portion of Cottage Grove was still relatively undeveloped at that time (see Figure 9). By1969, the five acres surrounding the Cowan Househad been parceled offfrom the rest of the surrounding landand were owned by an individual identified on plat maps only as“E.B.” Changes made to the house in the 1960s or 1970s include the addition of shed- roofed dormers to the north and south elevations and the addition of stucco to the exterior. In 1972, 10301 Grey Cloud Trail was included (apparently for the first time) in the South and West St. Paul city directory; its owner was listed as Mary Okey. From 1973 until at least the mid- 1980s, much of the surroundingland around the subject Figure 8.1938plat map of Cottage Grove property was owned by Mary O’Boyle. Some or all of this showing Section 30.Map courtesy of the Library land was sold in the early 1990sto develop the existing golf of Congress. 25 course.By 1995, 10301 Grey Cloudconsisted of the 2.75- 23 Vogel, The New England of the West, 53. 24 Hudson Map Company, Plat Book of Washington County, Minnesota (Minneapolis, MN: Hudson Map Company, 1938), 19; Atlas Company, Plat Book of Washington County, Minnesota (St. Paul, MN: Atlas Map Company, c. 1949); Thomas Nelson Company, Atlas of Washington County, Minnesota, 1956, “Cottage Grove,” https://www.co.washington.mn.us/DocumentCenter/View/1912/1956_platbook. 25 Vogel, Preliminary Inventory of Pre-1940 Houses, 92; “Village of Cottage Grove,” map, Rockford Map Publishers, 1969, on file at the John R. Borchert Map Library; “Village of Cottage Grove,” map, Rockford Map Publishers, 1973, on file at the John R. Borchert Map Library; “Village of Cottage Grove,” map, Rockford Map Publishers, 1976, on file at the John R. Borchert Map Library; “East Part of Village of Cottage Grove,” map, Rockford Map Publishers, 1982, on file at the John R. Borchert Map Library; “East Part of Village of Cottage Grove,” map, Rockford Map Publishers, 9 acre parcelthat it is today. FollowingMary Okey’s death in c. 1995, the property was owned by the Thompson family and then Doebler Real Estate before it was purchased in 2019 by the adjacentgolf 26 course. Figure 9.1964 aerial photograph of the Figure 10.1956 plat map of Cottage Grove southwest corner of Cottage Grove.Photograph showing Section 30.Map courtesy of the courtesy of the University of Minnesota’s John R. University of Minnesota’s John R. Borchert Map Borchert Map Library. Library. 1986, on file at the John R. Borchert Map Library; personal communication, Mike Mrosla, November 12, 2021; R. L. Polk & Co., Polk’s South St. Paul and West St. Paul City Directory (St. Paul, MN: R. L. Polk & Co., 1972), 177. 26 Quit Claim Deed, November 15, 2019, Document No. 4218540, on fileat Washington County Property Records and Taxpayer Services; Limited Warranty, April 20, 2005, Document No. 3517977, on file at Washington County Property Records and Taxpayer Services; Quit Claim Deed, August 9, 1999, Document No. 3063839, on file at Washington County Property Records and Taxpayer Services; Personal Representative Deed, June 28, 1995, Document No. 849102, on file at Washington County Property Records and Taxpayer Services. 10 DJUZ!PG!DPUUBHF!HSPWF!MPDBM!EFTJHOBUJPO! QBTU!EFUFSNJOBUJPOTPG!IJTUPSJD!TJHOJGJDBODF 10301 Grey Cloud Trail is not currently locally designated by the City of Cottage Grove, nor is it listed on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). In 1990, a history-architectural survey noted that the property “could probably be nominated to the City Register of Historic Sites and Landmarks solely on the basis of its architectural significance.” However, the survey also recommended additional research “to firmly establish its 27 historical associations.” EFTJHOBUJPO!DSJUFSJB! The City of Cottage Grove defines historic resources as properties that meet any one of five criteria as outlined in Chapter 9 of the City Code of Cottage Grove, Minnesota. The criteria that must be considered when determining the historic significance of a property include: 1. Its character, interest, or value as part of the history or cultural heritage of the city, the state or the United States; 2. Its association with persons or events that have made a significant contribution to the cultural heritage of the city; 3. Its potential to yield information important in history or prehistory; 4. Its embodiment of distinguishing characteristics of architectural type or style, or elements of design, detail materials or craftsmanship; and 5. Its unique location or singular physical appearance representing an established or familiar visual feature of a neighborhood or community of the City. Our research on the history of the property suggests that the property may be historically significant under Criterion 1 for its association with Cottage Grove’s history as an agricultural community and under Criterion 4 as a unique local example of limestone construction. Our research did not uncover any associations with significant persons or events (Criterion 2) or suggest that the property represents an established and familiar feature of its neighborhood (Criterion 5). No information was uncovered to suggest that the property was formerly used as a hotel. It is unknown if the property meets Criterion 3 as it has not been evaluated for archaeological significance. 27 Vogel, New England of the West, 53 – 54. 11 JOUFHSJUZ! In order to be locally designated, a property must not only meet criteria for historic significance but also retain integrity. In other words, it must retain enough of its physical features and materials to convey its historic significance. As Chapter 9 of the City Code of Cottage Grove does not provide criteria for evaluating integrity, we have considered the integrity of the subject property using the National Park Service (NPS) definition of integrity. According to the National 28 Register Bulletin How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation,a property’s integrity is recognized through seven aspects or qualities: 1)Location 2)Setting 3)Design 4)Workmanship 5)Materials 6)Feeling 7)Association Research and on-site investigation suggest that the property has experienced some significant alterations since its original construction. There have been some changes to the property’s setting, most noticeably the development of the golf course to the southeast. Alterations to the house’s original materials, design, and workmanship include a one-story addition added around 1942, roof dormers added in the 1960s, stucco cladding applied to the exterior in the mid-1960s or early 1970s, and roofing replaced with asphalt shingles at an unknown date. Additionally, it is likely the house originally had an entrance portico later replaced by a porch, which has since been removed. Though in poor condition, the associated barn appears to retain much of its original materials, design, and workmanship. The property appears to meet local Criterion 1 and Criterion 4 for historic significance. However, alternations to the property have impacted integrity. It may no longer be eligible for local designation due to the loss of integrity. OBUJPOBM!SFHJTUFS!PG!IJTUPSJD!QMBDFT!)OSIQ*!EFTJHOBUJPO NRHP listing and local designation are two separate processes and designations. NRHP listing is overseen by the NPS and must meet NPS requirements for historical significance and integrity. The NPS Criteria for Evaluation define historically significant properties as properties: A.That are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or 28 National Park Service, How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation, rev. ed. (Washington, D.C.: 1995), 44, https://www.nps.gov/subjects/nationalregister/upload/NRB-15_web508.pdf. 12 B.That are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or C.That embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or 29 D.That have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Significant changes to the house since its construction might pose a challenge to listing the property on the NRHP. Additionally, more information is needed to determine if the property has historical significance under NPS Criteria for Evaluation. This includes: Additional research to compile a complete list of all building owners and occupants Comparison against similar properties in Cottage Grove to determine if this property is unique and therefore more likely to be significant Determination of a period of significance for the property (the time period during which the property obtained historical significance) Additional research is needed to determine if the property has historical significance as defined by the NPS Criteria for Evaluation. Alterations to the property have impacted integrity, and it may not be eligible for the NRHP due to a loss of integrity. ! 29 National Park Service, How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation, rev. ed. (Washington, D.C.: 1995), 2, https://www.nps.gov/subjects/nationalregister/upload/NRB-15_web508.pdf. 13 TPVSDFT!DPOTVMUFE! Atlas Company. Plat Book of Washington County, Minnesota. St. Paul, MN: Atlas Map Company, c. 1949. Find a Grave Index, 1600s-Current. Ancestry.com. Fisher, Duane D. “The Development of Cottage Grove, The First Rural Settlement in Minnesota.” Term paper, Macalaster College, 1954. On file at the Minnesota Historical Society, St. Paul, Minnesota. Hudson Map Company. 1926 Plat Map of Washington County. On file at the John R. Borchert Map Library, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. Hudson Map Company. Plat Book of Washington County, Minnesota. Minneapolis, MN: Hudson Map Company, 1938. https://www.loc.gov/item/2007633510/. th Jones, George W. “Township No. 27N, Range No. 21 West 7 Mer.” March 15, 1848. United States Bureau of Land Management. General Land Office Historic Plat Map Retrieval System, https://www.mngeo.state.mn.us/glo/index.html. Klueh, Larry. “Barns in the City: Agrarian Landmarks in Cottage Grove.” Perspectives in Cottage Grove History, No. 4. August 1989. McAlester, Virginia. A Field Guide to American Houses. Rev. ed. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2014. Military Warrant, accession number MW-0759-034, March 3, 1854, General Land Office, https://glorecords.blm.gov/details/patent/default.aspx?accession=0759- 034&docClass=MW&sid=jq5vpuvb.sfl#patentDetailsTabIndex=1. Minnesota State Population Census Schedules, 1875 and 1885. Accessed via Ancestry.com. Minnesota Territorial Census, 1857. Accessed via Ancestry.com. Neill, Edward D. A History of Washington County and the St. Croix Valley: Including the Explorers and Pioneers of Minnesota. Minneapolis, MN: Northstar Publishing Company, 1881. https://content.wisconsinhistory.org/digital/collection/wch/id/70736. Northwest Publishing Company. Plat Book of Washington County, Minnesota. Minneapolis, MN: Northwest Publishing Company, 1901. https://collection.mndigital.org/catalog/spl:2062#/image/0. Oberly, James W. “Military Bounty Land Warrants in the United States, 1847-1900.” February 17, 1992, ICPSR, https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09514.v1. Probate Case File No. 4358-4395. 1916 – 1917. Accessed via Ancestry.com. 14 R. L. Polk & Co. Polk’s South St. Paul and West St. Paul City Directory. St. Paul, MN: R. L. Polk & Co., 1972. Rockford Map Publishers. “Village of Cottage Grove.” 1969. On file at the John R. Borchert Map Library, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. ---. “Village of Cottage Grove.” “Village of Cottage Grove.” 1973. On file at the John R. Borchert Map Library, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. ---. “Village of Cottage Grove.” 1976. On file at the John R. Borchert Map Library, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. ---. “East Part of the Village of Cottage Grove.” 1982. On file at the John R. Borchert Map Library, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. ---. “East Part of the Village of Cottage Grove.” 1986. On file at the John R. Borchert Map Library, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. Rosenfelt, Willard E. Washington: A History of the Minnesota County. Stillwater, MN: Croixside Press, 1977. Schmidt, Andrew J., Daniel Pratt, Andrea Vermeer, and Betsy Bradley. Railroads in Minnesota, 1862 – 1956. Multiple Property Documentation Form, 2013. United States Bureau of the Census. Eighth Census of the United States, 1860. Accessed via Ancestry.com. ---. Tenth Census of the United States, 1880. Accessed via Ancestry.com. ---. Thirteenth Census of the United States, 1910. Accessed via Ancestry.com. ---. Fourteenth Census of the United States, 1920. Accessed via Ancestry.com U.S. Marriages Index, 1849-1950. Ancestry.com. The Farmer. The Farmer’s Atlas and Directory of Washington County, Minnesota. St. Paul, MN: Webb Publishing Company, 1912. https://collection.mndigital.org/catalog/p15160coll6:161#/image/0. Thomas Nelson Company. Atlas of Washington County, Minnesota. 1956. https://www.co.washington.mn.us/DocumentCenter/View/1912/1956_platbook. Vogel, Robert. A History of Washington County: Gateway to Minnesota History. Stillwater, MN: Washington County Historical Society, 2008. ---. Cottage Grove History: A Palimpset. Prepared for the Advisory Committee on Historic Preservation, City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota, 1997. On file at the Minnesota Historical Society, St. Paul, Minnesota. 15 ---. “Historic Houses of Cottage Grove: A Field Guide.” Perspectives in Cottage Grove History, no. 1 (February 1986). On file at the Minnesota Historical Society, St. Paul, Minnesota. ---. “Minnesota Historic Properties Inventory Form.” WA-CGC-034. 1984. On file at the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office, St. Paul, Minnesota ---. Preliminary Inventory of Pre-1940 Houses in the City of Cottage Grove. Prepared for the City of Cottage Grove Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission and the Advisory Committee on Historic Preservation, September 1988. On file at the Park Grove Library, Cottage Grove, Minnesota. ---. The New England of the West: A Survey of Historic Properties Associated with Early American Settlement in Cottage Grove. Prepared for the City of Cottage Grove, September 1990. On file at the Park Grove Library, Cottage Grove, Minnesota. Warner and Foote. Map of Ramsey and Washington Counties: with Adjacent Portions of Anoka, Dakota & Hennepin counties, Minnesota, and Parts of St. Croix & Pierce Counties, Minnesota. Minneapolis, MN: Warner and Foote, 1886. https://collection.mndigital.org/catalog/spl:2062. Washington County Property Records and Taxpayer Services, Stillwater, MN. Zellie, Carole. Washington County Historic Contexts. Prepared for Washington County Land Management, 1999. On file at the Park Grove Library, Cottage Grove, Minnesota. 16 BQQFOEJY!B;!DVSSFOU!QIPUPT! 17 House at 10301 Grey Cloud Trail. West elevation, looking east. November 2021. Courtesy of the City of Cottage Grove. 18 House at 10301 Grey Cloud Trail. West elevation, looking northeast. November 2021. Courtesy of the City of Cottage Grove. 19 House at 10301 Grey Cloud Trail. Southelevation, looking northeast. November 2021. Courtesy of the City of Cottage Grove. House at 10301 Grey Cloud Trail. East elevation, looking northwest. November 2021. Courtesy of the City of Cottage Grove. 20 House at 10301 Grey Cloud Trail. North elevation, looking southeast. November 2021. Courtesy of the City of Cottage Grove. Barn at 10301 Grey Cloud Trail. November 2021. Courtesy of the City of Cottage Grove. 21