Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023-02-27 PACKET 06.1. (ROCKET CAR WASH)STAFF REPORT CASE: SP23-004, CUP23-004, PUD23-004 ITEM: 6.1 PUBLIC MEETING DATE: 2/27/23 TENTATIVE COUNCIL REVIEW DATE: 3/15/23 APPLICATION APPLICANT: Rocket Carwash, LLC, on behalf of NTW, LLC REQUEST: A site plan review of a proposed car wash to be located at the former Big O Tires; a conditional use permit for the drive -through car wash; and a Planned Unit Development (PUD) to allow for parking lot setback and deciduous tree flexibility. SITE DATA LOCATION: 8647 and 8649 East Point Douglas Road South ZONING: MU, Mixed Use GUIDED LAND USE: Mixed Use within 300 Feet of Arterial Roadways LAND USE OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: CURRENT GUIDED NORTH: Commercial Mixed Use within 300 feet EAST: Commercial Mixed Use within 300 feet SOUTH: Highway 61 Highway 61 WEST: Commercial Mixed Use within 300 feet SIZE: Building = 5,160 square feet DENSITY: RECOMMENDATION Approval, subject to the conditions stipulated in this staff report. Cottage Grove COTTAGE GROVE PLANNING DIVISION � 4/'ere Pride and Prosperity Meet Planning Staff Contact: Conner Jakes, Associate Planner; 651-458-2868; ciakes _cottagegrovemn.gov Application Accepted:. 2/1/2023 60-Day Review Deadline: 4/3/2023 City of Cottage Grove Planning Division • 12800 Ravine Parkway South • Cottage Grove, MN 55016 Planning Staff Report Rocket Carwash Planning Case No. SP/PUD/CUP2023-004 February 27, 2023 Proposal Rocket Carwash, LLC (Applicant), on behalf of NTW, LLC (Property Owner), has submitted ap- plications for a Site Plan Review, Planned Unit Development (PUD), and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) at 8647/8649 East Point Douglas Road South. The Applicant is proposing to construct a 5,160 square foot automobile carwash (drive -through). The proposed project would be located on a .983-acre parcel of land to the southwest of the current Wendy's restaurant and northwest of the current Target site. Site Location Review Schedule Application Received- February 1, 2023 Application Accepted- February 2, 2023 Planning Commission Meeting- February 27, 2023 Tentative City Council Meeting- March 15, 2023 60-Day Review Deadline- April 3, 2023 Planning Commission Staff Report — Rocket Carwash Planning Case No. SP/PUD/CUP2023-004 February 27, 2023 Page 2 of 11 Background The subject site has been occupied by an automotive repair use since the original approvals in 1991 and is currently occupied by Big O Tires. In 1992 an application for a simple lot division was submitted and approved. The intent at the time was to create two parcels allowing the user to separate the automotive use from potential office space for additional tenants. Currently, the entire site is occupied by one tenant and the only use onsite is automotive repair. A condition of approval will require the two lots be combined into one lot. 2022 Aerial Photo Proposed Use The proposed 5,160 square foot structure would be operated and owned by Rocket Carwash, a City+Ventures Company, which operates in eight states. The car wash offers premium wash pack- ages and free vacuums for both monthly members and single use customers. Typical hours of operation are from 7.00 a.m. to 9.00 p.m., Monday through Sunday. Site Operations There is one motor vehicle wash operation being proposed for the site. The full -service car wash begins with the customer entering the property and arriving at the Point of Sale (POS) system, which is staffed during all hours of operation. The customer then drives into the entrance door where the vehicle is pulled through the wash by the anti -collision belt system. The vehicle is then dried by air-dry blowers which have a sound mitigation system installed. Following the wash, the customer can then utilize the free vacuums and the member's room if they have purchased an upgraded membership. The member's room contains various cleaning products for the customer's vehicle as well as a floor mat cleaner. If a customer proceeds through the POS system and decides not to proceed with the car wash, one of the employees will assist the customer in using the car wash bypass route prior to entering the car wash. Planning Commission Staff Report — Rocket Carwash Planning Case No. SP/PUD/CUP2023-004 February 27, 2023 Page 3 of 11 Car Wash Bypass Route Car Wash Entrance Point of Sale {+ System Vacuums ti Car Wash Exit i Proposed Entrance Location Proposed Exit Location Proposed Site Operations The car wash tunnel uses a reclaim system where water used to clean the vehicles is recovered and treated to the point where it is acceptable to be used in the wash and rinse process. The reclaim system will recover 80 percent of water used in the car wash. The system utilizes a com- bination of methods to purify the water for re -use. Planning Considerations Zoning and Comprehensive Plan The subject site is zoned MU, Mixed -Use District, and is guided as Mixed Use in the 2040 Com- prehensive Plan. The proposed use is consistent with the City's zoning ordinance and land use plan. Automobile carwash uses are permitted with a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) within the Mixed -Use Zoning District. Planned Unit Development The PUD process is a tool that provides additional flexibility for development that an underlying zoning district would not otherwise allow. It is intended to overcome the limitations of zoning reg- ulations and improve the overall design of a project. Due to site constraints from the 30-foot ease- ment along the northwest and southwest property lines, site plan flexibility from the required parking lot setback and required number of tree plantings is needed. The Applicant is aware of the flexibility and has proposed additional landscaping and a higher percentage of Class 1 archi- tectural materials to offset the flexibility. Planning Commission Staff Report — Rocket Carwash Planning Case No. SP/PUD/CUP2023-004 February 27, 2023 Page 4 of 11 Site Access The site's access is located off the internal private drive through a private ingress and egress easement with Target. The Applicant is proposing separate entrance and exit lanes at the access location with the intent of improving circulation throughout the site. The separate entrance and exit lanes will cause all traffic internal to the site to travel in the same direction. 4. o $ Ir,;ecal Private a .:a v Proposed Entrance ;� 9 Proposed Exit Location , +� Location Site Access Building Setbacks The proposed building meets or exceeds all setback requirements for the zoning district. The front yard setback is defined as the boundary of a lot which abuts an existing or dedicated public street and, in the case of a corner lot, it shall be the shortest dimension on a public street. Due to the site being a corner lot, the front yard setback is the southwest property line and must meet the minimum corner lot setback for the front yard. The property line to the northwest is adjacent to a public street and must meet the side yard setback for a property line adjacent to a street. Building Setbacks Mixed Use District Standards Proposed Corner Lot Setback, Front Yard (Southwest) 20 feet 36.2 feet Side Yard adjacent to street (Northwest) 25 feet 32.5 feet Side Yard Southeast 10 feet 109.8 feet Rear Yard 10 feet 48.3 feet The required parking lot front yard setback is 20 feet to the southwest property line, the proposal is a 9-foot setback. Due to site and easement constraints, flexibility from the required front yard parking lot setback is needed in order to meet all other requirements for the redevelopment of the site. Planning Commission Staff Report — Rocket Carwash Planning Case No. SP/PUD/CUP2023-004 February 27, 2023 Page 5 of 11 i Proposed Carwash / Building Location Proposed Building Location and Front Yard Parking Lot Setback Stacking City Code Title 11-4-7 requires all commercial car washes to have a minimum of 4 stacking spaces per wash stall. The Applicant is proposing one motor vehicle wash stall operation with two lanes of stacking. The total number of stacking spots shown is 34. Trash Enclosure The proposed trash enclosure will be located on the southern part of the site. The Applicant has proposed the structure to be constructed with concrete masonry materials that are the same ma- terials as the principal structure, as discussed in the Architecture section of this report. City Code Title 11-3-8 states that trash enclosures must be setback a minimum of 10 feet from the adjacent property lines. The proposed trash enclosure is located 29.3 feet from the southwest property line and 34 feet from the southeast property line. Planning Commission Staff Report — Rocket Carwash Planning Case No. SP/PUD/CUP2023-004 February 27, 2023 Page 6 of 11 Proposed Trash Enclosure Location Parking City Code Title 11-3-4 does not list a specific number of parking stalls required for the proposed automobile car wash use. Rather it states that for uses not specifically noted, the parking require- ments shall be determined by the most similar use. The most similar use listed is a self-service passenger vehicle car wash, which requires two stalls per wash bay. The Applicant is proposing one wash bay and 20 total parking stalls with vacuums available at each stall. Of the 20 proposed stalls, one stall will be ADA compliant, and three stalls are proposed for employee parking. Em- ployees will utilize the standard parking onsite and when utilized, the vacuums for those stalls will be unavailable for customers. The total number of employees on the largest shift is three employ- ees. In addition, the Applicant is proposing the majority of parking stalls to be 13 feet in width and 20 feet in depth. City Code Title 11-3-4 requires parking stalls to be a minimum of 9 feet in width and 20 feet in depth when the stall angle is 90 degrees. Parking Lot Layout Architecture City Code Title 11-3-11 requires newly constructed buildings in commercial districts be comprised of a minimum of 65 percent Class 1 materials and use three different materials from Class 1 or 2, and not more than 10 percent Class 4 materials. Planning Commission Staff Report — Rocket Carwash Planning Case No. SP/PUD/CUP2023-004 February 27, 2023 Page 7 of 11 The Applicant is proposing 83.1 percent Class 1 materials and three materials from the Class 1 material list below. The proposed materials used on the exterior fagade include masonry brick, stone, and glass windows (all Class 1 materials). In addition to the Class 1 materials, the Applicant has proposed a metal panel to be used on the structure (Class 3 material). Below is a breakdown of material composition percentages: • Masonry: 48.5% • Stone: 6.9% • Glass Windows: 27.7% • Metal Panel: 17.0% Norinwest bunging tievanon 5outneast t miaing tievation 5outnwest tsuiming tievation ENT11NEE ��11, ►�,� r r,+ Al Northeast Building Elevation Planning Commission Staff Report — Rocket Carwash Planning Case No. SP/PUD/CUP2023-004 February 27, 2023 Page 8 of 11 Landscaping The Applicant has submitted a detailed landscape plan. City Code Title 11-3-12 requires that a minimum number of trees and shrubs be provided based on the gross square footage of the subject property. Landscape Plantings Mixed Use District Standards Proposed Overstor Trees* 12 3 Coniferous Trees 11 13 Shrubs 26 306 Due to the easement restrictions onsite, the area for planting is greatly reduced and the minimum number for deciduous trees cannot be met. To offset the reduced number of overstory trees, the Applicant is proposing to plant additional coniferous trees and shrubs that greatly exceed the number required. City Code Title 11-4-7 requires screening of the stacking and exiting areas for all automobile car washes; furthermore, it states the primary source of screening shall be the principal building. In order to meet these requirements, the Applicant has proposed to utilize both the principal structure and landscaping for screening. The principal structure is proposed on the northwest side of the parcel which is intended to screen the stacking area from the adjacent roadways. Landscaping is being utilized to screen the stacking area from the adjacent parcel to the east and adjacent road- way to the west. In addition, the Applicant is proposing a two -foot tall, landscaped berm along the private drive to screen the stacking area from the neighboring parcel to the southeast. Lanascape Tian Planning Commission Staff Report — Rocket Carwash Planning Case No. SP/PUD/CUP2023-004 February 27, 2023 Page 9 of 11 Outdoor Lighting Outdoor light fixtures will consist of six parking lot light poles that are 20 feet in height, with each light pole consisting of a single head that is downward directed. City Code Title 11-3-10 limits the amount of light that can be emitted from commercial property to 1.0 foot-candle onto adjacent properties. The Applicant has submitted a photometric plan that is consistent with the City Code. In addition, all light fixtures will be downward directed in order to limit any light spillage. Utilities The subject property is located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). City sewer and water services are available for connection along the edges of the property. City sewer runs through an easement on the north and west sides of the property and city water runs along the private drive access south of the property. Design for the connection to the utilities and the re- moval of the existing services into the property will need to meet the requirements as set forth in the engineering memo dated February 9, 2023. Surface Water Management/Grading The site grading for the project is proposed to meet the surface water management requirements established by the State, Watershed District, and the City's Surface Water Management Plan. The applicant has proposed an underground private stormwater system that will connect to the city's storm stewer system within the private drive access south of the property. A private storm water maintenance agreement will be required to be executed for the proposed private system. Development Fees All applicable development fees have been paid at the time of original development. The Applicant will be required to work with the Metropolitan Council to determine the number of units for the Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) which will be collected with the building permit fees. Public Hearing Notices The public hearing notice for the February 27, 202,3 Planning Commission meeting was published in the Saint Paul Pioneer Press and mailed on February 15, 2023, to 14 property owners that are within 500 feet of the proposed project. Staff has not received any comments at the time of writing the report. Recommendation That the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve the Site Plan Review, Planned Unit Development, and Conditional Use Permit for a 5,160 square foot automobile car wash facility to be located at 8647/8649 East Point Douglas Road South subject to the following conditions: 1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to the plans, as determined by the planning staff, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 2. The Planned Unit Development and Conditional Use Permit approvals shall expire one (1) year from the date of City Council approval unless a building permit has been requested or a time extension has been granted by the City Council. The City Council may extend the expiration date of such approval upon written application by the person to whom the approval was granted. Planning Commission Staff Report — Rocket Carwash Planning Case No. SP/PUD/CUP2023-004 February 27, 2023 Page 10 of 11 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the two lots shall be combined and a copy of the executed lot combination supplied to the City. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall incorporate the recommen- dations, requirements, and evaluations noted in the Bolton & Menk memorandum dated February 9, 2023, and subject to modifications that are agreed to by the developer and City Engineer. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference. 5. All applicable permits (i.e.; building, electrical, grading, right of way and mechanical) and a commercial plan review packet must be completed, submitted, and approved by the City prior to the commencement of any construction activities. Detailed construction plans must be reviewed and approved by the Building Official and Fire Marshal. 6. The Applicant must receive all required building permits from the City of Cottage Grove prior to construction. 7. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the final grading plan shall be approved by the City Engineer. 8. Installation of landscaping shall occur in a timely fashion and be consistent with an ap- proved plan. A letter of credit in the amount of 150 percent of the landscape estimate shall be submitted to the City as required by City ordinance. The financial guarantee shall be held until all required plantings are installed. At such time of installation, the Planning De- partment shall conduct an inspection to verify compliance with the landscape plan. If the inspection is approved, 50 percent of the financial guarantee shall be released. One year from the date of initial inspection a follow-up inspection shall be conducted to verify surviv- ability. If the follow-up inspection is approved, the remainder of the financial guarantee shall be released. 9. All light poles shall be a maximum of 25 feet in height, including base, and shall be down- ward directed, with LED lamps and flush lens unless approved in writing by Planning staff. Attached security lighting shall be shoebox style, downward directed with flush lens. In addition, any entry lighting under canopies shall be recessed and use a flush lens. Shields shall also be added as directed by the City. 10. The grading and erosion control plan for the site must comply with NPDES II Permit re- quirements. Erosion control devices must be installed prior to commencement of any grad- ing activity. Erosion control must be performed in accordance with the recommended practices of the "Minnesota Construction Site Erosion and Sediment Control Planning Handbook" and the conditions stipulated in Title 9-7-1, Erosion Control During Construc- tion, of the City's Subdivision Ordinance. The Applicant shall be responsible for the costs for the City to inspect the site in relation to erosion control conformance. 11. The Applicant must provide the City with an as -built survey of all utilities and grading plan prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy. Planning Commission Staff Report — Rocket Carwash Planning Case No. SP/PUD/CUP2023-004 February 27, 2023 Page 11 of 11 12. All mechanical equipment on top of the building and on the ground shall be screened from public view. The mechanical units shall be screened as required in Title 11-3-9 of the City's Zoning Ordinance. 13. Proposed trash enclosures shall be constructed using the same materials and patterns used on the building. 14. Rubbish, waste, and recycling containers shall be stored within an appropriately sized en- closed structure compliant with City ordinance screening requirements and shall always be maintained so as not cause odors or other public nuisances. 15. The Applicant is responsible for removing debris from all adjacent public and private road- ways during their grading and construction process. The adjacent streets shall be swept clean daily or as needed. 16. All areas of the site, where practical, shall be sodded and maintained. 17. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall provide a material sample of the exterior building and the materials shall be approved by planning staff. 18. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the planning department shall review and approve a final landscaping plan. 19. Irrigation shall be provided for all landscaped areas. The irrigation system shall consist of an underground sprinkling system that is designed by a professional irrigation installer to meet the water requirements of the site's specific vegetation. The system shall be detailed on the final landscape plan. 20. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall provide a snow removal and storage plan detailing how snowfalls will be accommodated on site. 21. Signage is not approved as part of this application. All signage shall meet the requirements of the sign ordinance and require a separate building permit. No signage shall be allowed on the trash enclosure. 22. An ingress and egress easement shall be maintained at all times between property owners to allow for access to the site. Prepared by Conner Jakes Associate Planner Attachments Site Civil Plans Landscaping Plan (2-15-2023) Engineering Review Memo Stacking Analysis Plan SITE STATISTICS: ADDRESS/LEGAL DISCRIPTION: GREEN SPACE PERCENTAGE:REOUIRED 3DR MINIMUM BG49 EAST POINT DOUGIAS RD S. COTTAGE GROVE, MN SS016 1 IMPERVIOUS PERCENTAGE: 27,543 S.F.2.1— 915.F.- % PERVIOUS PERCEMAGE: 15,296 S.F./92,839 S.F. 36R 2722DSUBDIMSION NAME COTTAGE GROVE PLAZA LOT 1 BLOCK 1 SUBDWISIONCD ALL TH T PART OF LOT 6, BLOCK 1, COTTAGE GROVE PLAZA, PROPOSED PARKING: ACCORDING THE PLAT THEREOF ON FILE AND ACCORDING RECORD IN THE OFFICE VANUUM STALLS: 19 N OF THE SOURLY RECORDER. WASHINGTON COUNTY. LYING / HA DICAP STALLS: 1 TOTAL SURFACE STALLS: 2D NORTHWESTERLY O THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: COMMENCING AT THE EDLI E: COMMENCING MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 6; THENCE NORTH 49 DEGREES 47 STACKING STALLS: 19 MINUT E 25 SECONDS WEST, ASSUMED BEARING ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE DF SAID LOT 6, A DISTANCE OF 91.12 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH DEGREES E SECONDS 4.p / 45 12 MINUT 14 WEST, A DISTANCE OF 123.41 FEET; THENCE NORTH 44 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 01 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 21.OD FEET; THENCE SOUTH 45 DEGREES 12 SECONDS DISTANCE OF 96.0 FEET TO THE MINUTES 14 WEST A SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 6 AND THERE TERMINATIN(k SUBJE T TO 4 THE PROVISIONS DF WASHINGTON COUNTY RECORGER DOCUMENT NO 859742 6647 EAST POINT DOUGLAS RD S. COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 y/ x /' N \ THAT PT LT 6 BLK 1 LYING SELT OF FDLL DESC LN COM AT MOST ELT CDR SD LT THN N44DEG4]']5' W ASM BRG AUG NELY LN SD LT 91.12R TO POG °it THN S45DEG12'14 YI 121.41FT THN N44DEG45'OI"W 21FT THN 945DEQ12'14Y1 DILOU TO SWLY SD THERE TERM SUBI TO x S"r "n4 \ PRDPO ED STACKING LN LT & MUTUAL PERP DRNVV/PRK EASE PER DOC M659742 SUBDIVISIONNAME ANE=2D1 COTTAGE GROVE PIAZA LOT 6 BLOCK 1 SUBDIVISIONCD 27229 / ° ♦ \ APPLICANT: OWNER: / ROCKET CARWASH, LLC. MW U. 222 S. HST86102 Q6O2s pAUM BEACH GARDENS. OMA NE GARDENS. FL 1341D OHMHA. NE PRINCIPAL USE: VEHICLE CAR WASH Q, � / / O v O. G 0 \ BUILDING TYPE. STOREFRONT \ FIRM PREPARING SITE PLAN: REM ENGINEERING INC. OLD CHENEY ROAD SUITE A, d,NATE LNCOLN NE 68512 BURNETT, P.E. / i PROPOSED WATER REcuATON �� AREA OF LOT: � "• SYSTEM � � AREA OF TRACT: 92,839 S0. R. OR .98 ACRES, MORE DR LESS SHEET NOTES o� ) . THIS SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL CITY CODE APPLICABLE ON THE DATE OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL. AIA ' EL HVA]ION 8089E \ ` E 3 ,•} 1 / 2. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE LOCATED IN THE FROM YARD OR eee��L \ q WP J S5 STREET SIDE YARD AND SHALL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW FROM ANT PUBLIC WAY WITH LANDSCAPING FENCING, OR WALLS CONSISTENT WITH \ \ _ THE BUILDING DESIGN. COLORS, AND MATERIALS. 2p • `� iGAD / 1. ANY AMENDMENTS OR CHANGES TD THE PROJECT SITE THAT DO NOT MEET WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN NEED TO BE APPROVED WITH THE a }P'D•6y � ® CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE ENGINEERING PRIOR TO INSTALLATION/CONSTRUCTIDN. 4. THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPING, BOTH EXISTING AND PROPDSED, SHALL BE h 4' G,q MAINTAINED FOR THE LIFE OF THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. 'i 9 5. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHOULD BE RESTDRED BY SEEDING, SDDDING DR LANDSCAPING. s9 � ' � I PROPOSED RESS CATIO 6. ALL PLANTING GEDS SHALL INCLUDE NON -LIVING PERMEABLE MATERIALS PROPOSED REFUSE '9 ' '(\ LOGTIDN SUCn AS ROCK. LOGTION ]. SIDEWALK/DRNE APPROACH PERMIT IS REQUIRED. 8. ALL WORK IN THE CITY WAY SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE l� V � WITH CITY OF COTTAGEE GROVE ROVE MIIN MINNESOTA REGULATIONS. 4) GENERAL NOTE: PROPOSED ,y EGRE E FOLLGWING H� DARDI'� IMPERVIOUS AREA OF LOT: � COCA ON �6 \ \ tREPNURS OF OPENTAID �IAREE TYPIAGLDI FOR SHON MAN TO 5 RKING PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA: 2]593.D5 So. R. 2.:PP2. ROxPSaTED ]MOx`.SHHHIS nlIR.E."Ex TEEAL PARKING REQUIREMENTS - LL OFFER VARI\ FREE NI LEVELS 0 BOTHPREMIUM T LREWISH IERS AND SINGLLE USE CU111E1_ MEMIERSHIPS ARE NOT OFFER MEMGE.H,P PERKS SUCH AS ACC �R50 To A BUT M' WITH FLOOR MA7 IMSHII EGU ANENT. FREE CLEANING AND COMPU ENIARY BEVERAGES. THE PREMIUM E PREMIUM CARWASH L IS =O EMPLOYEESSTALLS S=NSH"F O :SEES ADA VACUUM — SHOWN - 1 STALL TOTAL VACUUM STALLS SHOWN 2D STALLS NORTH sc 1 — 26 SUBMITTAL DATE: February 1st, 2023 � 2uLI PRO]ECT r , ,rZ EXISTING POND LOCATION „•�� � s � COTTAGE GROVE EXISTING POND NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP SEC. 21, TN27N, R21W NORTH ZONING DESIGNATION/PROPERTY USE 'PUD' PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. PROPERTY IS WITHIN ZONE CONDITIONS MU (MIXED USE) NO PROPOSED REZONING REQUESTED Zoning Information REWIRED PROPOSED CONTACT l Ivan, rr 92x S.F./.9B A.C. MIN. FRONTAGE NONE REQUIRED FED z (PROP.) MIN. BET-B FRONA 2D FED 9 FEET IIAL SETBACXS SIDE ID FED ID FED HpTP3: REAR ID FED 1. FEET .1° MAX BUIAS' GHECM 54 s ., / 1- 55PACES Sl PARKINGLREGUTAR LILY DGCRETIDN 0 STACKING REQUIRED PE= STALL 4 STALLS BENCHMARKS(AS PROVIDED) BENCHMARK #1. 1/2- IRON PIPE TO ON THE NEST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY. EL-BOB.91 BE , B SURVEY NOTE: WNTHS FROM RECEIVING BUILDING PERNITS. 1. THIS SURVEY WAS COMPLETED BY KALEB J. KADELBACK, RPLS 5]0]D, AT 5. ONLY TRAFFIC D60THE0 BE 19 ANTICIPATED 10 B11 VEHICLES AT A E NORTHWESTERN SURVEYING AND ENGINEERING, INC. THE DESIGN OF THIS PROJECT IS BASED ON A TOPOGRAPHIC AND BOUNDARY SURVEY PROVIDED TO APPROOF O 200 PERHOUR O R PE REDA ENGINEERING BY THE CLIENT. REM ENGINEERING ACCEPTS NO AID MAY BE U AK PER DAY IT RESPONSIBILITY FOR ACTUAL FIELD CONDHIONS OF TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES 15D VEHCLES�PER I HOUR. GH AS 000 VEHICLES T W H AND ANY NEGATIVE AFFECTS SAID TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY HAS ON THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL NECESSARY ELEVATIONS AND HORIZONTAL CONTROL BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. to ROCKET GROVE, iZEGA TACK COTTAGE GROVEOVE,, MN. iT�2 COVER SHEET C� .00 KET ENGINEERING GOI OLD CHENEY RO. SUITE A UNengineering' s ( COLN, NEBRASKA BB612 02012023 ,D2>,B,.]SQ I & surveying, architects I OWNER: NTW uC 43oD TBC WAY PAW BEACH GARDENS, FL 33,10 FIRM PREPARING SITE PLAN ARCHITECT: TACK ARCHITECTS 2922 N. B1ST STREET STUDD 1 MNE. 6810, P40 P. ,02-SDS-9]]B 4 NORTH PROJECT L1 EXISTING POND LOCATION 'f, Ii COTTAGE GROVE NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP 4 SEC. 21, TN27N, R21W NORTH LEGEND — PROPERTY LINE (ASSUMED) wu"llyphl, gPhla ® a ® atar ave 9 e nc ear 34 Wa — a h star ® P ,di�th—lva ® EladncTanslonnar ® n ave oz ® ® S ® ne an oa 0 Sorm net (Square) o a nePeaesal s�o,m ala��oaa� 4111Telephone lSHe—as P Ta,a a 'Pa a"dhapp eda w� ® a 0—headuaa �" Pa e Faaaa uaa e 0 B a� Pant BENCHMARKS(AS PROVIDED) BENCHMARK Ill. 1/2` IRON PIPE TO ON THE WEST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY. EL=B0B93 SURVEY NOTE: 1. THIS SURVEY WAS COMPLETED BY KALEB J. KADELBACK, RPLS 5]0]D, AT NORTHWESTERN SURVEYING AND ENGINEERING, INC. THE DESIGN OF THIS P"' CT IS BASED ON A TOPOGRAPHIC AND BOUNDARY SURVEY PROVIDED TOto REGA ENGINEERING BY THE CLIENT. REGA ENGINEERING ACCEPTS NO RESPONSIBIUTY FOR ACTUAL FIELD CON -OF TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES AND ANY EGATNE AFFECTS SAID TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY HAS ON THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL NECESSARY ELEVATIONS AND HORIZONTAL CONTROL BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. ROCKET GROVE REGA TACK COTTAGE GROVEOVE , MN. TD2� PROVIDED SURVEY PLAN C1 .Q1 KET ENGINEERING ' BOl OLD CHENEY RO.. SUITE A 'engineering' ' L UNCOLN. NEBRASKA BBS12 02012023 ,D2>,&T32 I I I I &surveying architects; t E � . ...........c aii� ..........I. ...ciin:iS� .....1��I,, ,�•.:iwi::::::::::::�ii::�r��0 �:caruopnoo.�.ain�oi:hs ii......�.ucir �u •� � ne00%�oon n %one MININCIAL 1 .mo.on � o r•oor v n000nn..�•. \� u000 rvr • ,ocao�.r• rii::::::::i....m..:.�� �;�..■::::::::i...........�r :�.......... �R.i.%off......Fr �.r ................................. O ,OAS...............%..� ��\\ ... .. .. .................kk 1 \`........................... ...O•\ \; G�iL.C..I............�; ..O ..r voe \ea.IYo.Ipuuu..j .. �000rp •...�� o�u �................. ......►.r ��+ ....\\' .................... ••••••••\.\. .UNr\\.OI...:::... ::::...........I� �... ...... .. .......I..;: 8r1 � • • � 1 � ,QOC�G��4 CARWASH �-►=< TRANSITION FROM 6• CURB Q' TO 24• MOUNTABLE CURB. / 20 g3(( /� / Ci O Q+ / / , ¢G �, / / SEENSHEET -; SEE SHEET CDETAIL R: 211Y 00LC 2 2.D 8 FOR FURTHERER DETAILS ry211 ON HANDICAP STALL R LOTT 6 6 PROTECT EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE - ,I ION. aoae3 � o- TRANSIT DN FROM 6" TO 29' MOUNTABLE CURB. 1 is \� SEE SHEET ENLARGED VIEW 12 THIS SHEET FOR FURTHER DETAILS. L,G CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT EXISTING SIGN DURING CONSTRUCTION. _ SEE ENLARGED VIEW /1 THIS SHEET. T CONTRNTOR TO PROTECT EXISTING TRANSFORMER ' `, - DURING CONSTRUCTION. TRANSITION FROM 6" CURB D GURER TO 2,. } ��CONTRLT RE TO D PLACETO REPLACE ASPHALT REMOVED PER DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS. TRANSITION FROM 6` CURB \ CONTRACTOR TO HATCH PROPOSED CURB PROFILE TO EXISTING CURB PROFILE. TRANSITION FROM 6' CURB TO 24' MOUNTABLE CURB. r —--7----- — — - --,--, 1. --- - - 1' p r I m€o '.. 20czo 1 2 C2.0 Q �V C I p D NOTE: POINT OF SALES EOUIPMENT SHOWN ON FOR ISLANDS IS FOR CDNTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH INSTALLER FOR FINAL PRODUCT. ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. 0 ENLARGED PLAN VIEW NORTH REFERENCE ONLY. THE #1 + + + + + s + + + +o l 4 NORTH scuE zo 1 ao 0 20 40 60 F-1 D 1 LEGEND 6 ]` CONCRETE PAVEMENT �e 1 6 - 8" CONCRETE PAVEMENT f3� 1 - 6" STAMPED/COLORED CONCRETE ISEE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS) - 9" CONCRETE PAVEMENT e 20 1 J - SNOW MELT SYSTEM 210 — - - — - PROPERTY LINE (ASSUMED) 1 I - STRUCTURAL STOOP, PROVIDE A' EXPANSION JOINT n/POLYURETHANE SEALANT (SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS) - PIPE BDLIARD - PAINTED TRAFFIC ARROW o -, ' "'°' .1 1+ AiD SHEET NOTES CONTRACTOR TO NSTALLCURB AND GURER TO NOTCH EXISTING ' D + 1 1. PAINTED UNLOADS AND ISLANDS ARE ," WIDE STRIPE. COLOR 0 REPLACE ASPHALT REMOVED PER DEMoURoN REDUIREMEIRS. yy TELLOYI 2' O.C. O 95' 7,1 2. PAINT BHALL BE ACRYLIC RESIN LEAD AND CHROMIUM FREE WATERBDRNE TRAFFC PANT OR VOC CDMPLMNT ALKYD RESIN LEAD AND CHROMIUM FREE TRAFFIC PAIN. ? 3. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL FACE OF CURB BE PMN STRIPPED. 1N + + + • 4. CURE TO BE REMOVED PRIOR TO APPLICATION OF PAIN STRIPING. d 5. ALL PAIN STRIPING SHALL BE 9 IN WIDTH, COLOR YELLOW. S. SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR FURTHER INFDRMATIDN ON BUILDING. + + + + + N/ 7.1/2" PREFORMED EXPANSION JOIN WITH SEALANT ' 7 + ALONG BUILDING. B. VACUUM EWIPMENT AND DESIGN HAYDUT BY OTHERS. PARKING REQUIREMENTS ENLARGED PLAN ENLARGED PLANVIEW #2 NORTH T-L EMPLOYEES N TOTAL EMPLOYEE STA.1 SHOWN - 3 STALLSSTA A. BENCHMARKS(AS PROVIDED) SURVEY NOTE: BENCHMARK M1. 1/2 IRON PIPE TD ON THE WEST 1. THIS SURVEY WAS COMPLETED BY KALEB J. KADELBACK, RPLS 5]0]D, AT CORNER OF THE PROPERTY. NORTHWESTERN SURVEYING AND ENGINEERING, INC. THE DESIGN OF THIS EL= 11- PR" CT IS BASED ON A TOPOGRAPHIC AND BOUNDARY SURVEY PROVIDED R) REGA ENGINEERING BY THE CLIENT. REGA ENGINEERING ACCEPTS NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS OF TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES AND ANY NEGATIVE AFFECTS SAID TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY HAS ON THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL WORK. NECESSARY ELEVATIONS AND HORIZONTAL CONTROL BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. to ROCKET GROVE, ZEGA TACK COTTAGE GROVEOVE, MN. TD2� SITE LAYOUT PLAN C1.03 KET ENGINEERING ' Bpl OLD CHENEY RD.. SUITE A 'engineering' 1 1 UNCOLN, NEBRASKA —202012023 ,D2>,&TSQ I I I I &surveying architects; Q�'A2 47 QO ~Ic / NOW OR f^ R OWNER: NTh LL E ED) .MED) / POLOCK21, LOT0 / BLOCK 1, LOT PARCEL A / / y / 20,63OSF3 / / / i EL `1 I ` 0 ♦zx \ ♦ r ` SEE SHEET Cl. D6 FOR SPOT GRADES \� EXISTING NLRB ET SILT SAVER PRODUCT SODD, GUTTER BUDDY OR '97'0��1j OD GEOCURVE INLET APPROVE EOUAL PRODUCT. O AD�bF�Gp FILTER PROTECTION : ♦♦♦ OPEN TO TRAFFIC NOTUS ♦ 1 LSAVER S CT BUDDYORAPPROVE EOUALPRODUCT.. ♦ Z. REPLACE EROSION CONTROL AS REQUIRED. UR R TO ERLY _— ♦♦ R: N LLC DWI 021 112 27 L T of Ds ! d / Y / O I' I I / SEE SHEET D6 FOR SPOT GRADES CURB INLET PROTECTION 1.0 0 sraLE IG' IN STAKES 10 MLI CONCRETE BLOCKS. PLASTIC NER ETC. Z. PLAN NO 1 ACTUAL LAYOUT DETERMINED I N FIELD. T. THE CONCRETE WA—T SIGN SHALL BE INSTALL WITHN 30 FT. OF THE TEMPORARY CONCRETE WASHWT FACILITY. iTPELE STAPLES (CONCRETE BLOCK) lLMI CONCRETE BLOCKS, PIAS'ITI C INER ETC NATNE MATERIAL WOOD OR (OPTIONAL) OR METAL s7nKEs SECTION TEMP. CONCRETE WASHOUT 1.D 4 NORTH SCALE = 2O ael LEGEND — CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (PLATE NO. ERO-13) PRDPERTY LINE (ASSUMED) —SF— _ SILT FENCE (PLATE NO. ERO-1) 807 — — _ EXISTING CONTOURS 607 — PROPOSED CONTOURS �XXXX — TOP OF CURB SPOT ELEVATION — CURB GUTTER ELEVATION � — PAVEMENT SPOT ELEVATION � — SPOT GROUND ELEVATION � — TDP OF CURB TO MATCH TOP OF CURB EXISTING ELEVATION I MATCHF — PAVEMENT TO MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT ELEVATION — DIRECTION OF FLOW —X— DR —HIGH PLASTIC CONSTRUCTION FENCE CURB INLET PROTECTION J — AREA INLET PROTECTION SHEET NOTE: 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL SURER ELEVATIONS ARE 0.5' BELOW TOP OF CURB ELEVATIONS. NOTE: THIS PROJECT IS LESS THAN 1 ACRE AND DOES NOT REQUIRE A SWPPP PERMIT. CONTRACTOR SHALL ADHERE TO THESE PLANS AS BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. SURVEY NOTE: 1. THIS SURVEY WAS COMPLETED BY KALEB J. KADELGACK, RPLS 5707D, AT NORTHWESTERN SURVEYING AND ENGINEERING, INC. THE DESIGN OF THIS PROJECT IS BASED ON A TOPOGRAPHIC AND BOUNDARY SURVEY PROVIDED R) REGA ENGINEERING BY THE CLIENT. REGA ENGINEERING ACCEPTS NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS OF TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES AND ANY NEI-NE AFFECTS SAID TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY HAS ON THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL NECESSARY ELEVATIONS AND HORIZONTAL CONTROL BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. to ROCKET GROVE, REGA TACK COTTAGE GROVEOVE,,NM.D2 GRADING PLAN Cl.04 KET ENGINEERING M OLD CHENEY RD.. SUITE A engineering' L 1 UNCOLN, NEBRASKA RB51Z 02012023 (03)AIR-2 & surveying, architects; it 1 30.0' UTILITY 1 EASEMENV PCR DOC. 59,65J 9,65 8 � / h 1 C \ 1 GUTTER BUGGY 01 CONCRETE CURB APPROVED EOUAL AND GUTTER (WHERE APPLICABLE) AREA INLET CONCRETE CURB .Wool AND GUTTER oo (WHERE APPLICABLE) - � � ,• oo AREA INLET oo oo oo wo GUTTER UTER BUGGYDR i o , o NORTH LEGEND — - - — - PROPERTY LINE — 807 - PRDPD5ED CONTOURS � - TOP OF CURB SPOT ELEVATION Gig XXXX.11 � - CURB GUTTER ELEVATION XXXX� - PAVEMENT SPOT ELEVATION - SPOT GRDUND ELEVATION - TOP OF ROLLOVER CURTC MATCHB � - TOP OF CURB TO MATCH TOP OF CURB EXISTING ELEVATION � - PAVEMENT TO MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT ELEVATION -X— OR I ' - HIGH PLASTIC YY CONSTRUCTION FENCE SHEET NOTE: 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL GUTTER ELEVATIONS ARE OS' BELOW TOP OF CURB ELEVATIONS. 2. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL GUTTER ELEVATIDNS FOR ROLLOVER CURB ARE 0.33' BELOW TOP OF CURB ELEVATIONS. SURVEY NOTE: 1. THIS SURVEY WAS COMPLETED BY KALEB J. KADELBACK, RPLS 5707D, AT NORTHWESTERN SURVEYING AND ENGINEERING, INC. THE DESIGN OF THIS PRQIECT IS BASED ON A TOPOGRAPHIC AND BOUNDARY SURVEY PROVIDED TO REGA ENGINEERING BY THE CLIENT. REGA ENGINEERING ACCEPTS NO RESPONSIBILTTY FOR ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS OF TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES AND ANY NEGATNE AFFECTS SAID TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY HAS ON THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL NECESSARY ELEVATIONS AND HORIZONTAL CONTROL BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. to ROCKET GROVE, RREGA TAC K COTTAGE GROVEOVE,,NM. �D2 GRADING PLAN C1.05 • KET ENGINEERING W OLD CHENEY RD.. SUITE A 'engineering' L UNCOLN, NEBRASKA BBS12 02012023 ,D2>,&71Q I &surveying, architects; I I I I 1 � 1 / 1 1 1 1 � - - - - - - -I- - - - - 1 1 1 S ' S ' 1 1 1 1 SHEET NOTE: 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL GUTTER ELEVATIONS ARE D.5' BELOW TOP OF CURB ELEVATIONS. 2. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL GUTTER ELEVATIONS FOR ROLLDNER CURB ARE 0.03' BELOW TOP OF CURB ELEVATIONS. NOR H LEGEND - - - - PROPERtt LINE 307 - - - EXISTING CDWDIJRS - 807 - PROPOSED COIJTDURS XXXXXX - TOP OF CURB SPOT ELEVATION CUT XXXX.XX � - CURB GUTTER ELEVATION XXXX� - PAVEMENT SPOT ELEVATION � - SPOT GROUND ELEVATION XX F _ TOP OF RGU-ER CURB TC - TOP OF CURB TO MATCH TOP OF CURB EXISTING ELEVATION P MATCH � - PAVEMENT TO MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT ELEVATIDN -OR - ,' HIGH PLASTIC CONSTRUCTION FENCE SURVEY NOTE: 1. THIS SURVEY WAS COMPLETED BY KALEB J. KADELBACK, RPLS 5707G, AT NORTHWESTERN SURVEYING AND ENGINEERING, INC. THE DESIGN OF THIS PROJECT IS BASED ON A TOPOGRAPHIC AND BOUNDARY SURVEY PROVIDED TO REGA ENGINEERING BY THE CLIENT. REGA ENGINEERING ACCEPTS NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS OF TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES AND ANY NEGATIVE AFFECTS SAID TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY HAS ON THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL NECESSARY ELEVATIONS AND HORIZONTAL CONTROL BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. to ROCKET GROVE, REGA TACK COTTAGE GROVEOVE, MN. iT�2 GRADING PLAN C1.06 KET ENGINEERING ' GOI OLD CHENEY RD.. SUITE A 'engineering' L UNCDLN. NEBRASKA RB512 02012023 02>,B,.732 I I I I &surveying architects; 4 NORTH s—E r = 2a c / 2D Nn LEGEND �¢ a/ i �. ozo�s������ ---- �sAhN �''ly - PROPERTY LINE (ASSUMED) —SS— -SANITARY SEWER LINE �BS�ilo O�F�C� —W W— _ WATER LINE PROPOSE SEWER LINE FIRE HYDRANT ryry. Al WATER VALVE / ♦ R ® - STORM SEWER AREA INLET SANITARY CLEANDUT / G_ GAS LINE e / A'(RVC)FL-B06.5B / G © - GAS METER / GRADE=-BOB- ENGTH=25.6X RADE= ID.93OA R J2 �GRADEH-1I.GG C Q�h 44' LENGTH-10.00 ILIE G9 LINE CONNECTION \ /�+� AR(PVE IG,02.95 > SAN iA v SEW'R—OLE(ASSUMEO) / / GRADE--1 D.931f INV NR ]89.8] (ASSJNED) / / / y ENGTH-12t.60 ADJUST EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE TD PROPOSED FINISHED / GRADE PER THE RIM ELEVATION PROVIDED ON GRADING SHEET. / - RECLAIM TANKS. r1 A CAUTION SANITARY SEWER LINE CROSSING. �\ ✓� �N O40�e,2\Y4"r o ® �w4'4SHEET NOTES: QCt \\ AC K O� 55 1 ALL UTILTIES TERMINATE 5'-D` OUTSIDE BUILDING. FOR CDIJTINATION INSIDE BUILDING, 1 '(PVC)FL-TB9.66 SEE MECH./ELEC. PUNS. ENGTH=2.60 / 2. COW ACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CAS LINE CONNECT PROPOSED SANITARY LINE \ ANO GAS METER CONNECTIONS WTH XCEL INTO EXISTING B' SANITARY LINE WITH A B'zA' WYE. e��� \ ENERGY BY CALLING 1-BDD-628-2121 PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION- T9�.� s� \ 3. ALL SANITARY PIPE SHALL BE SOLID WALL SCHEDULE AO PVC WITH CLEAN DOTS EVERY 41 1GO MAX. A. THE SANITARY ELEVATIONS IS ASSUMED. THE �H CDNTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM THE ELEVATIONS BEFORE THE INSTALUTIDN. THE CITYs\ CONFIRMED THAT SERVICE LINE DEEP BETWEEN B' TO W. BENCHMARKS(AS PROVIDED) l BENCHMARK #1. 1/2- IRON PIPE TD ON THE NEST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY. E—B.93 SURVEY NOTE: 1. THIS SURVEY WAS COMPLETED BY KALEB J. KADELGACK, RPLS 5707D, AT NORTHWESTERN SURVEYING AND ENGINEERING, INC. THE DESIGN OF THIS PROJECT IS BASED ON A TOPOGRAPHIC AND BDUNDARY SURVEY PROVIDED TO RECA ENGINEERING BY THE CLIENT. REGA ENGINEERING ACCEPTS NO RESPONSIBILTY FOR ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS OF TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES AND ANY EGATNE AFFECTS SAID TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY HAS ON THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL NECESSARY ELEVATIONS AND HORIZONTAL COMROL BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. to ROCKET GROVE, ZEGA ! TACK COTTAGE GROVEOVE, MN. �DG SANITARY C 1.07 . T ENGINEERING i I AND GAS UTILITY PLAN GG1 OLD CHENEY RG. SUITE A engineering; UNCOUN. NEGRASKA 6B512 pa rC 14V C 411 �e 1l 02012023 (AD2)A84-2 ITGI surveying) S I 4 SNOW MELT NORTH G S CTHANIGLE PLAN. 2G 40 ea A�n'�o,� LEGEND '��a `'� �� ♦ Al'�'BGSG�, �o 4�1 °/Q BUILD NYLOPLAST JUNCTION BOX ---- - PROPERTY LINE (ASSUMED) SANTARY SEWER LINE W .E.(IN)=808.25 —WW— -WATER LINE o _ P 6' 4• E I.E.(IN)-BD6.86 E.SUME=WOS.}D S� - PROPOSED STORM / (ASSUMED. FIELD VERIFY) V SEWER LINE ExDT ]6 \, - FIRE HYDRANT 4- DPE FWATER VAE STORM SEWER AREA INLET SEE ENIARCED / ' I R m LV• M - SANTARY CLEANDUT VIEW t THIS SHEET. BUILD NYLOPIA4T JUNCTION BOX G GAS LINE [,� 3 D ♦ssDlx C.E.-B1D.45 © -GAS METER LE.(IN)-BO5.00 (ASSUMED, FIELD VERIFY) ' SEE SHEET L'c F �� Q y / NOTE 5 � m553 W 479,E / - l2E F—.41 - BUILD NYLOPIAST JUNCTION BDX C.E.-B1D.45 4'/ - [[xDt n]-------------------------- .E.(IN)-11,11 >� I AUTION / to mF - - - E.(OM-BDB.to W3R( SAUMEO) - WATER LINE CROSSING. ' - (ASSUMED, FIELD VERIFY) uir N- r8E E (ASSUMED) /� _ fti MAINTAIN l8" VERTICAL bRRxm B• HOPE 6" HOPE FIM. 809.4 tRAD[- tAlt y ,� LFNDIH 1.41 Itt ExFxxEER of AYr NmR[MxrLI[5 [[xD1X-RA5] / D�R.m FUB06.96 - O:m&]4t SNOW MELT SYSTEM. / 5• RDDF Iwlx SEMRATION. -- SEE MECIANIGL C.E.-BOB.11 '-----_-- LE.( UT) �% / (ASSUMED, FIELD VERIFY) .... . ....... . ...... ... ro CONTRACTOR TD INSTALL ADVANCE DRAINAGE [ SYSTEMS, INC. MC-3s00 STORMTECH c / 2 [TIRON PIPE ACHAMBERCCOMPANYING TO SPECIFICATIONS PROVIDED IN ENLARGED PLAN VIEW #1 ELEv no,m aoa es \ a GA �P \ \ �\ / yd / ACCOMPANYING DRAINAGE REPORT. NORTH SCALE: 1•-10'-D" C.E: BO6.4B 2 54 ADJUST EXISTING SANITARY SEWER �.a. \ a a e• I.E.pN)=BDD.]s a°.v'�5" / SHEET NOTES: ANHDLE TO PROPOSED FINISHED G M GRADE PER THE RIM ELEVATION ., �\�y (A I.EMED.-BO1.OD ,y0 �'6 t A PROVIDED ON GRADING SHEET. P9 T - \ %' (.9 _ (ASSUMED, FIELD VERIFY�� / LL UTILITIES TERMINATE ION I OUTSIDE BUILDING. FOR CONTINUATION INSIDE BUILDING, 0 m SEE MECH./FEEL. PLANS. DPEha ML 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE GAS LINE _ AND GAS METER CONNECTIONS WITH XCEL BUILD NYLOPLAST \ CONNECT 4• WATER LINE Iwo EXISTING ENERGY BY CALLING 1-800-628-2121 CURB INLET l o WATER MAIN. LINES NEEDS TO BE CE=BD].18 ]6 FxGI \ PRESSURE AND SACTERM TESTED. 3. COVER ELEVATIONS FOR Yz3' NYLOPIAST CURB 4 6E.(IN)=B09.OD `o \ INLETS ARE AT THE GUTTER. LE SHE-BD1.50 hv� L13 CONTRACTOR TO REINSTALL SALVAGED FIRE 4. REDUCE WATERLINE TO 1` INSIDE BUILDING. SEE SHEET NOTE j11 C, \ HYDRANT AND WATER VALVE. CONTRACTOR WILL COORDINATE WITH WITH COTTAGE DROVE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. BUILD AREA INLET C.E.- 806.16 fj - I.E.- BD2.96 (OUT) \ s� B O WILD LAST a 6 ;CURB INLET C.E.-Bo5s5 �\ BENCHMARKS(AS PROVIDED) PROVIDED) 6E.(IN)-802.]5 BENCHMARK #1. 1/2" IRON PIPE TD ON THE NEST / LE.(OUT)-BON.35 CORNER OF THE PROPERTY. V SEE SHEET OTE R} E—B.93 SURVEY NOTE: 1. THIS SURVEY WAS COMPLETED BY KALEB J. KADELBACK, RPLS 5]0]D, AT NORTHWESTERN SURVEYING AND ENGINEERING, INC. THE DESIGN OF THIS PROTECT IS BASED ON A TOPOGRAPHIC AND BDUNDARY SURVEY PROVIDED TO RECA ENGINEERING BY THE CLIENT. REGA ENGINEERING ACCEPTS NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS OF TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES AND ANY NEGATIVE AFFECTS SAID TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY HAS ON THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL NECESSARY ELEVATIONS AND HORIZONTAL COMPOL BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. to ROCKET GROVE, ZEGA ! TACK COTTAGE GROVEOVE,, MN.DG STORM SEWER C .08 T ENGINEERING '� AND WATER UTILITY PLAN 601 OD CHENEY Ro. SUITE A engineering; C0.x. NEBRASKA 6Bs12 pa 1r 11 �e 1l 0201.2023 (4D2)A84-2 IT7A surveying) • C 14V C 4S QSUBURBAN AUTOTURN ANALYSIS NORTH 4 F-250 AUTOTURN ANALYSIS NORTH BENCHMARKS(AS PROVIDED) SURVEY NOTE: BENCHMARK #H 1/2- IRON PIPE TO ON THE WEST 1. THIS SURVEY WAS COMPLETED BY KALEB J. KADELBACK, RPLS 5707D, AT CORNER OF THE PROPERTY. NORTHWESTERN SURVEYING AND ENGINEERING, INC. THE DESIGN OF THIS EL=60&93 REM CT IS BASED ON A TOPOGRAPHIC AND BOUNDARY SURVEY PROVIDED TO REM ENGINEERING BY THE CLIENT. REGA ENGINEERING ACCEPTS NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS OF TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES AND ANY NEGATIVE AFFECTS SAID TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY HAS ON THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL NECESSARY ELEVATIONS AND HORIZONTAL CONTROL BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. to ROCKET CARWASHZEGAjjjI TACKCOTTAGE GROVE, MN. r1 09 KET ' TD2AUTOTURN ANALYSIS PLAN V� - . ENGINEERING ' ' ' ' SGI OLD CHENEY RO.. SUITE A 'engineering' L UNCOLN, NEBRASKA BB51Z 02012023 (AD3>ABA.TSAZ & surveying, architects; i T EXISTING TREE WITHIN 10' OF PROPERTY LINE, ttP. / 5 \ W RREWT SRENED CANOPY ADDITIONAL .�.. WERSTORY TREES TO BE NORTH PIANTED. SCALE 1" = 20 EXISTING NON-INRIXY000 }0 er -/J \ SPECIES TREE TO REMAIN EXISTING TREE WITHIN 1D' ( /,1( '>0'� 0� Df PROPERTY LIVE, ttP. PLANT SCHEDULE Q' \ �� /- .� WUTURE TREE GNDPI !/,�/ �/ RRANR 0 ADDIT ONAL j /� Lv 2�"���J'�O/" EX ST NG NON IARIXVOOD *1VFy.Q��J C �aC SPEC ES TREE TO REMAIN RN \\ \ : JT� � P� C/ � ] .,I\ \i �� • Alb, mIlbl P 3 cai. Gas 40 63nnt 25 40nTO w. %/ FONT d EXISTING TOR SFDRMEROT DURING CONSTRUCTION. RS EXISTING NON -OR / / M1 .� ♦ \ SPECIES TREE TO REMINO REMAIN EXISTING TREE WRHIN 10' f ! 6 Of PROPERTY LINE, ttP. IIRRANTS NO ADDITIONAL L �e¢s �naaensslrasem Heaoua, eranaara �unK 15 jai. ex,e nn. m. 1 w. / -Y /`% ✓/ �Py�2 Q Q ��D P��' WERSTOM TREES TO BE � V `b PIANTED. O� e@" / f �/ T �0�0' � ) ♦ \ /', 12 P gbl 10 M1t 3 lw. QQ-y F POINT OF COMMENCEMENT l 1 v p g Lauer Ie as p e n Ht ex,e w. ry )ELY MOST COL. LOT 6) NOW OR ,ERLY o �HD OWNER NT),' LC PE ' 121120011 PID:2102 1, ,T BITU W ,Epp 6LOCE / yJlY //- / PARCEL LOT 6 FlC A QJ oTe Q (J` O .�- POIW OF COMMENCEMENT O iy eem e p ese ear y g v .in . w. 20,6305Ft C i Q O _�' (F, MOST CDR. LOT 6) 0 I, [,era ester reamer Heea Lr— Igbl Ibn. e6. w. NOw0R �FLY \ T ITIJMINOUS SURF I)i� OW ER: LLC 1 I��- )��/ AID; 1oz7 11 27 C lu Dery e BK B08.926 8D8.926 a e 2' TALL LANDSCAPE BERM U nu name Y v in In w. Ter sDe93J \\\"< o y \ . ` .D�J / aQ i LL ss i m P 1 � �S ` � T r ,� ' T 001 a ® / '6 3 � Y TALL IAND".af PE BERM bt HP� l P van Iuou 9 vot 1n bib, ht 1 ar®Loa Lp,aa O �' �t � '� � Wog G2 �-bo�oti�tiw�� umocove Tv oEscaiPnom l a \V Owvra T use LF. 01111,alaa Nbl,aieaaEaea, Sbpaala Pia,l,,e—MwmF—Gera cc)� 4 \ \ KI O�Q'I 2' TALL LANDSCAPE BERM to Gaalrom Roc ( ) utv tua Betl Etlgerountlmver. Data. 7215 SF. Ph lb-1— TO F.—(RTF)Sbd B0 LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS- ^ \ \ \\ () ZONE ED USE the MX O TOTAL SITE AREA; 42,865 SF wI� TOTAL REOUREMENTS FOR OPEN SPACE: 12,805 SF 30R myp BULDNG 5,160 SF 3. e1M1rmrcresa aver beparnz mnmum mszn many mu meatoaagnn II PARKING LOTINTERIOR: 9.015 SF M1 A DRIVEWAYS 11,650 SF SHRUB BED/PLANING AREA 10WS SF gt ns mve onto \ \ \ \ \ RHZOLATOUS TALL FESCUE SOD. 7.215 SF vapor. REQUIRED OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS 12 REOURED DECIDUOUS TREES ON SRE 5. a aleim oat manas�a wnn \ REQUIRED OVERSTCONIFEROUS: 1t REQUIRED CONIFEROUS TREES REQUIRED ON SRE. REDUIRED SHRUBS: 26 REDUIRED SHRUBS ON SHE. SUMMAR : TOTAL WERSTORY DECIDUOUS PROVIDED: A TOTAL WERSTORY DECIDUOUS EXISTING AND/OR SURVEY NOTE: TO VINIFEROUS PRWIDED13 1 WRHIN 5' SHRUBS PROPERTY: 10 . THIS SURVEY WAS COMPLETED BY KALEG J. KADELBACK, RPLS 5]0]G, AT TOTAL Y � NOHWESTERN SURVEYING AND ENGINEERING, INC. THE DESIGN OF THIS TOTAL SHRUBS PROVIDED: JOB RT PRW CT IS BASED ON A TOPOGRAPHIC AND BOUNDARY SURVEY PROVIDED TO REM ENGINEERING BY THE CLIENT. REM ENGINEERING ACCEPTS NO to RESPONSIBILITY FOR ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS OF TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES AND ANY NEGATIVE AFFECTS SAID TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY HAS ON THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL NECESSARY ELEVATIONS AND HORIZONTAL CONTROL BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. ROCKET GROVE, iZEGA TACK COTTAGE GROVEOVE,, MN. TD2 L1.01 ET ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE PLAN 6p1 OLD .CHENEYNEBR SRG.KA SUITE A 'engineering' 1 1 UNC0.N, NEBRASKA BB512 0201.2023 (902)ABI.]N2 �& surveyingarchitect S GENERAL LANDSCAPING NOTES 1. ALL UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE. COORDINATE INSTALLATION WITH WORK OF OTHER SECTIONS. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION WITH OWNER OF U1IUTIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE UTILITIES WHICH LIE WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. CALL 811 TO NOTIFY UTILITY CDMPANY FDR DEBATING ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIER TO DIGGING. 2. AVOID DAMAGE TO UTILITIES DURING THE COURSE OF THE WORK. REPAIR AT NO COST TO OWNER ANY DAMAGE TO UTILITIES, SITE STRUCTURES, ETC., RESULTING FROM LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPORT TO THE OWNER ANY DAMAGE TO OWNER'S PROPERTY AND OR UTILITIES PRIOR TO REPAIR. 3. PLANTING SOIL SHALL BE A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 5" AND CONSIST OF 50% SELECT LOAMY SOIL, 25% PEAT MOSS, 25% PIT RUN SAND. PLANTING SOIL SHALL BE NEUTRAL BALANCED OF Ph OF 5.5-7.4 FRIABLE AND CONTAINING NOT GREATER THAN 2.0%-5% ORGANIC MATTER BY DRY WEIGHT. PLANTING SOIL SHALL BE FREE OF OF NON —SOIL TIMES SUCH AS STONES, CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS, STICKS, TRASH AND OTHER DELETERIOUS MATTER. EXISTING TOPSOIL (STOCKPILE FROM SITE) USED MAY NOT EXCEED 10% CLAY CONTENT, SILT SHALL NOT EXCEED 25% AND FREE OF WEEDS, WEED SEEDS, INSECTS AND PESTS. 4. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE OF GOOD QUALITY, FREE OF DISEASE AND SIZES SHALL MEET REQUIRED SIZES AS SPECIFIED. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE RATED FOR ESTABLISHMENT, GROWTH AND SURVIVAL IN PLANT HARDINESS ZONE 4 AND/OR ACCORDING TO THE LATEST VERSION OF THE USDA PLANT HARDINESS ZONE MAP. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL MAINTENANCE AND WATERING OF ALL PLANT MATERIAL UNTIL SUBSTANTIAL PROJECT COMPLETION OR OWNER AND ENGINEER/ARCHITECT ACCEPTANCE OF ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS, WHICHEVER IS LATER. 6. DO NOT INSTALL PLANT MATERIAL WHEN AMBIENT TEMPERATURES MAY DROP BELOW 32DEGREES F (0 DEGREES C) FOR MORE THAN 24 HOURS. DO NOT INSTALL PLANT MATERIAL WHEN TEMPERATURES OVER 100 DEGREES F WITHOUT WRITTEN DIRECTION FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. DO NOT INSTALL PLANT MATERIAL WHEN WIND VELOCITY EXCEEDS 3D MPH. 7. IN ALL AREAS TO RECEIVE SOD, PLANTING BED PREPARATION, MULCHING, FERTILIZING AND PRE —EMERGENT APPLICATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH INDUSTRY STANDARDS. B. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE HIS/HER EFFORTS SO THAT THE SITE CAN BE SODDED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE FOLLOWING RE —SPREAD OF TOPSOIL. 9. ALL PLANTING BEDS (SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVERS) SHALL RECEIVE 3" AVERAGE DEPTH OF RIVER PEBBLES LANDSCAPE ROCK. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A 5—FOOT DIAMETER RING OF NATURAL COLOR HARDWOOD MULCH WITH STEEL EDGE AROUND ALL TREES PER DETAIL. 11. PLANT QUANTITIES IN PLANT SCHEDULE ARE FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY AND ARE NOT GUARANTEED. QUANTITIES ON PLAN WILL PREVAIL IF DISCREPANCIES OCCUR. 12. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO MARK ALL TREE LOCATIONS AND LAYOUT ALL OF PLANT MATERIAL IN THE FIELD FOR APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLANTING UNLESS APPROVED OTHERWISE. 13. SHRUBS ARE NOT TO BE LOCATED CLOSER THAN 2 FEET TO CURB OR SIDEWALKS. PERENNIALS / GRASSES ARE NOT TO BE LOCATED CLOSER THAN ONE FOOT TO CURB OR SIDEWALKS. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PLANT THREE BE FOR OWNER / ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO PLANTING THE REMAINDER OF THE TREES ON SITE, 14. ALL LANDSCAPING TO BE INSTALLED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE REGULATIONS. DEMONSTRATIDN SHALL ILLUSTRATE A COMPREHENSIVE UNDERSTANDING OF INFORMATION INCLUDED IN THE PLANTING DETAIL AND SPECIFICATIONS. 15. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS NOTICE FOR APPROVAL OF PLANT LAYOUT AND SAMPLE TREE PLANTINGS. 16. STAKING AND GUYING OF TREES PER NATIONAL NURSERY STANDARDS. 17. SWEEP AND WASH ALL PAVED SURFACES. REMOVE ALL DEBRIS RESULTING FROM LANDSCAPE OPERATIONS. 18. GUARANTEE ALL WORK FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR BEGINNING OF THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE. MAKE ALL REPLACEMENTS PROMPTLY AS PER DIRECTION OF OWNER/ENGINEER. TREE PLANTING 1.0 Na sPaLE MULCH LAVER PROVIDEA6 SIDEWALK EDGE wIFEFREN \ MULCH —III—= - -- ill) III= —III=III=III=III—III=III III S° DEEP WELL, BLEND TO FINISHED GRADE. FINISH GRADE BACK FILL WITH NATIVE SOIL HOLE SIZE SO WIDTH OF ROOTBALL. II LOOSEN SOIL Sx WIDTH OF FOOTBALL. WATER SETTLE. -... .. SIDES of PLANT PIT SHALL ix BE SCARIFIED AND SLOPING NOTE SO 1. CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN NOT TO DAMAGETHE SHRUB OR ROOTFALL WHEN REMOVING IT FROM ITS CONTAINER 2 PRO KEN OR CRUMBLI NO ROOT BALLSWILL BE REJECTED. 3 PRUNE ALL EAD OR DAMAGED WOOD z D TO PLANTING SR HRUB GROUNDCOVERRPLANTING 1.0 Na s�aLE MINI REVEAL ON ALLPAVED SURFACES, INCLUDING CURBING. GRADE FOR MATERIAL DEPTH AND REVEAL NO EXCEPTIONS PRE EMERGENT HERBICIDE GRANITE♦DECORATVE ROCK PER LANDSCAPE LEGEND =1 H H I—III=1 I— s CA WOVEN POLYPROPYLENE — — — FABRC WEEDBARRER20YR PROVIDE GROUND ANCHOR PINS NOTE PER INDUSTRY STANDARDS 1. APPLY PRE EMERGENT HERBICIDE PER LABEL DIRECTIONS AND RATE 4 NERT GROUND COVER 1.0 Na sraLE DEEP x 0° I FILL WE CULTIVATED NATURAL MULCH EDGE SURVEY NOTE: 1.0 NO SCALE T. THIS SURVEY WAS COMPLETED BY KALEB J. KADELBACK, RPLS 570713, AT NORTHNESTERN SURVEYING AND ENGINEERING, INC. THE DESIGN OF THIS PROJECT IS BASED ON A TOPOGRAPHIC AND BOUNDARY SURVEY PROVIDED TO r REGA ENGINEERING BY THE CLIENT. REGA ENGINEERING ACCEPTS NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS OF TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES / AND ANY NEGOTIVE AFFECTS SAID TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY HAS ON THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL NECESSARY ELEVATIONS AND HORIZONTAL CONTROL BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. ROCKET CARWASHREGA TACK COTTAGE GROVE, MN. TD2� L 1.01 K ET ENGINEERING ' 6p1 OLD CHENEY SRO.KA SUITE A ;engineering; LANDSCAPE DETAILS UNC0.N, NEBRASKA BB512 02012023 E03>.,&.71,2 I& surveying) a rch Itects WGCOFELDI GOP, FQUD.DWOO TO DA E DPFF �R , A HDDE 3 saDOL D s��aDD�� '111WFLDFD IROOAOGLEE -- -- ' IGCOF BOLT WODONDRE<E IF(COLOR ClIK aRGI 1 VACUUM/TRASH/RECYCLING ENCLOSUREPLAIN2 VACUUM &TRASH/RECYCLING ENCLOSURE -ELEVATION -FRONT At 1/4"-TO At IS -TO COORD"'TR PO OF OOOPD WIELECAND OW ERA PANNO, COORD WI CIVIL L - J L _ J L - J k , 3 VACUUM &TRASH/RECYCLING ENCLOSURESIDE4 VACUUM &TRASH/RECYCLING ENCLOSUREREAR At 11 11 At iM"=1'O" RD, FLY PO IL OOOPD WI ELEC, AND OWNER JI IL J F— PAN11000NDWI1IVIL GF' Q�P sQM aQ sQM pQ�y �aP Q�9 OFeO OF�P OFeO OAS t0.( OFP� OOPF tOP� A SEE STRC G G STEEL COLUMN, G O G G O T G G STEESEN, E STR PAINT STRIPING, COOK W/ CML SMART SIGNAGE FAST PASSSEE TRCT KEEP OUT GATE ARE D��Z/ 7Z7Z� Z727 T ENLARGED PIANOF SALE ISLAND LAYOUT At KF -TO REGA TD2 TACK Rocket Carwash -Cottage Grove ET eENGINEERING &nsgineering sD,D23"2027 GROUP, INC. urveying a r C iI t@ C tS A, Floor Plan Notes a REGA jjjTD2 TACK Rocket Carwash -Cottage Grove ,�o mcx e 1oh—o FaENGINEERING &nsgineering oaT urveying architects 01232023 GROUP, INC. A2 MAS-1 MAS-2 MAS-3 MWP-1/2 MWP-3 STN-1 Exterior Material Elevation Notes MRI REGA jjjTD2 TACK Rocket Carwash -Cottage Grove eENGERG &nsgineering som° Rd, 2em urveying a r c iI t 2 C.t S o312123 GROUP, INC. A f — _V Aelr REGA TD2 TACK Rocket Camesh -Cottage Grove AIM engineering-,,gEar ENGINEERING arCitIt@Ct S'312023 OY[M GROUP, INC. &surveying _.:.,., .� Aa Rocket Camesh - Cottage Grove sonemanoaa�da�mg-bAgN,dh— gi. 312023 ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. 46- I Lop G engineering & surveying TACK 6 >i . Le qls REGA TD2 TACK Rocket Carwash -Cottage Grove engineeringbAgN,dh— AIM ENGINEERING arcitIt@CtS & surveying3,zoz3 e�,�. GROUP, INC. ....o., a� Aa i 1� MEMBERS ROOM C77 REGA T02 TACK RocketCarwash- Cottage Grove ET ENGINEERING engineering p .p }�+ _„x., roxm�wr �� VI I��GCIJ o,3,zoz3 �o.e�,=� GROUP, INC. &surveying Rocket Camesh - Cottage Grove son�ano aa�da�mg -aoxmg so�m Oi 312023 TACK architects I Rocket Camesh - Cottage Grove Sohematlo Rendering -Street New Oi. 31.2023 TACK 61 i-si . Legl.S REGA T02 TACK ET g g Rocket Ca wash -Cottage Grove ENGINEERING en ineerin architects so 31202 Renae,mg-sr aar taw SC Surveying o, 3, zoz3 �o e , . GROUP, INC. ba� o Rocket Camesh - Cottage Grove Sohematlo Rendering -Street New Oi. 31.2023 ACK architects SITE LIGHTING SCHEDULE -CITY REVIEW PARKING LOT LIGHTING CALCULATION STATISTICS AUExvcEEooTCANou_s � 03 ,. M�MUMEooTCANou_s uc o, � � °r s O a O comawx—Tx �ocusTxEETaxo a axaxcso.ucx.xccu oEuxEs. 'uuu.ox.ovsxsv Y axovoEo, TxEmauuTacTu T1x 1LLaxouloEaoETaLTID_1Tsv aoxTca oRVE-Txxu bbb axoaExnsxE. sxw.... DIEMoxsocaT oxsauo IUITTEs oT Ta.uxEUG sou.s of oT �ti' cax\v Q oO a. o JbQ �cx.T:TJxEP�xTOT ��xxMENc�osxxE�,vP� , Jy q e� qqs r 020 �s0 �o ob a 1�R�L SITE PLAN RE REGAjjj�jTo 2 TACK Rocket Carwash - Cottage Grove ENGINEERING engineering �CrRI-SITE GrvRE�,� architects o, 23 GROUP, INC. & Surveying °o, i EXISTING TREE WITHIN 10' OF PROPERTY LINE, TYP. FUTURE TREE CANOPY 5 RRANTS NO ADDITIONAL WEEIVTED.RY TREES TO BE 0P. EXISTING NON -HARDWOOD SPECIES TREE TO REANN 0- Nl SCALE 1' = 20 TO 0 IS EXISTING TREE WITHIN 1D' of PROPERTY LINE. TVA. PLANT SCHEDULE Q' J% / FUTURE TREE CANOPY �/ / RRAN S O ADDITONAL VIP— >n OVERSTORY TREES TO BE JPLANTED. - j , CIR4LY r �li'J)NO is SEX ST NON -HARDWOOD ES TO RENNI SPEC ES TREE TO N o S y r oWrv�b N,T V � a c Te� O���- ACERRUBRUMIROMP Be 4065FTHT %/ � FdWNT d E�IST NG TOR NSFDRMERM DURING CONSTRUCTION. RS EXISTING NON-IARDWODD / / M1 .� ♦ \ SPECIES TREE TO RELMIN EXISTING TREE WITHIN 1 f ! C OF PROPERTY LINE, 11 . S/ORM LINE FUTURE TREE GNDPY L. [ IPA IC111itN . UUU, 11APPPHU Cu- I I [,AL PIP 11 111I. HI. At WARRANTS NO ADDITIONALTIN BE rvHeu 1 ��5" IS SHOW BA WENTED. TREES TO BE �� / ) � I � ✓ (i�0� Q A \\v^\` `b E STUPLANTED Lr �D�y 12 11 CEA I -Ell NG NM TE SPRUCE 10 GAL. POT 10 HT. HO�.6 AV 2 • O , F POINT OF COMMETREME, f,b6 1 v11 —Ul wLUHNUU evHUCe n Hi. PIP NOW OR,ERLY .a ) (ELY MOST SA'N / LOT 6) '''�� /9Y 9 OWNER: NTYI Tk�i * > �O � PE - T PID:2102'i211200$G $ Pu - D 6LOCR 1, LOT B ,T BITU O) 1 N / /. PARCEL A /%// G' 7 O He Ary eeerwHeLyeHv AL vo 1 1 11 Ll .ED) / 20,6305Pt ` O o d� - (E MINT OODNMENLT6) IOR �RLY �W 0/ J� VOe LH rPeHLeU /01 O r.HI OW TUMINOU5 SURF R. 102i 11 a7 G 1A.111 11 OEH ITILLw 111 "1 1 11 HI. BOB.B26 8D8.926 O R cx .Loa 0�,� _ �• , v 99 * FD � � O� bHLrITILTALLIA t 01 U1 HI 172ELEVANPIPEQ1L 11 HI T HIN:. JIA ��NRR,,T*ggg 11 Ll ® �O✓ Z' TALL LA= PE BERM v E.i bvIHAtNON olvl[,A vArvUlOoueLt vLwv®OOLUHbvIHtN /GAL voI in b1,1N HI moo_ oN 0 o 4°;snNIN1111-1 NL s Hs o \' ow o / Q / Goa°oti Vyy9 INv N- 7e7.71 (SUlAP' oulvocovE oESCPIPrION 450 F 011111blad Nbl,,bl Gaa Edgb sbpb,b,b Plb,,,,g M,I,h F Sb.plb. Fb,A . Y ,b, �/�j �t)Q i e as rom oc ( cM1)wiM1 Cu iv 1 etl bft Glbu TALL LANDSCAPE BERM i SF. Ph zb.bto Ta Fescue (PTO Sbd 60 LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS: hb , La° bC \ 1L ZONE= MIXED USE the �f TOTAL SITE AREA. 42.l SF p TOTAL REOUREMENTS FOR OPEN SPACE: 12..5 SF I= 9O\\ \ BALD NG LOT IN SF A�Ih \ PARKING LOT INTERIOR: 9,015 SF M1M1 DRNEWAYS 1t,85D 3f ff mH pe E 1.2oho aleim o�manasre wnn SHRUB BED/PLANING AREA 10,025 SF \ \ F \ \ RH2OANT0U5 TALL FESCUE SOD: 1.211 SF REQUIRED WERSTORY DECIDUOUS: 12 REQUIRED DECIDUOUS TREES ON SITE. \ REQUIRED OVERSTORY CONIFEROUS: 11 REQUIRED CONIFEROUS TREES REQUIRED ON SRE. REQUIRED SHRUBS: 26 REDUIRED SHRUBS ON SITE. TOTALmWERSTORY DECIDUOUS EXISTING AND/oR SURVEY NOTE: -IN 5' OF PROPERTY: 10 TOTAL OVERSTDRY CONIFEROUS PROVIDED 11 1. THIS SURVEY WAS COMPLETED BY KALEG J. KADELBACK, RPLS 5707D, AT TOTAL SHRUBS PRWIDED: MIS NORTHWESTERN SURVEYING AND ENGINEERING, INC. THE DESIGN OF THIS PRW V IS BASED ON A TOPOGRAPHIC AND BOUNDARY SURVEY PROVIDED TOto REGA ENGINEERING BY THE CLIENT. RE. ENGINEERING ACCEPTS NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS OF TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES AND ANY NEGATIVE AFFECTS SAID TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY HAS ON THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL NECESSARY ELEVATIONS AND HORIZONTAL CONTROL BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. ROCKET GROVE, iZEGA TACK COTTAGE GROVEOVE,, MN. 1rD21 • ET ENGINEERING I W OLD CHENEY RG. SUITE A 'en ineerin I I LANDSCAPE PLAN LINCOLµ DEBRASKA BBS12 Ip� g g' architects I 02012023 (402).4P.7342 I(7X surveying) GENERAL LANDSCAPING NOTES 1. ALL UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE. COORDINATE INSTALLATION WITH WORK OF OTHER SECTIONS. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION WITH OWNER OF U1IUTIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE UTILITIES WHICH LIE WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. CALL 811 TO NOTIFY UTILITY CDMPANY FDR DEBATING ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIER TO DIGGING. 2. AVOID DAMAGE TO UTILITIES DURING THE COURSE OF THE WORK. REPAIR AT NO COST TO OWNER ANY DAMAGE TO UTILITIES, SITE STRUCTURES, ETC., RESULTING FROM LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPORT TO THE OWNER ANY DAMAGE TO OWNER'S PROPERTY AND OR UTILITIES PRIOR TO REPAIR. 3. PLANTING SOIL SHALL BE A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 5" AND CONSIST OF 50% SELECT LOAMY SOIL, 25% PEAT MOSS, 25% PIT RUN SAND. PLANTING SOIL SHALL BE NEUTRAL BALANCED OF Ph OF 5.5-7.4 FRIABLE AND CONTAINING NOT GREATER THAN 2.0%-5% ORGANIC MATTER BY DRY WEIGHT. PLANTING SOIL SHALL BE FREE OF OF NON —SOIL TIMES SUCH AS STONES, CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS, STICKS, TRASH AND OTHER DELETERIOUS MATTER. EXISTING TOPSOIL (STOCKPILE FROM SITE) USED MAY NOT EXCEED 10% CLAY CONTENT, SILT SHALL NOT EXCEED 25% AND FREE OF WEEDS, WEED SEEDS, INSECTS AND PESTS. 4. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE OF GOOD QUALITY, FREE OF DISEASE AND SIZES SHALL MEET REQUIRED SIZES AS SPECIFIED. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE RATED FOR ESTABLISHMENT, GROWTH AND SURVIVAL IN PLANT HARDINESS ZONE 4 AND/OR ACCORDING TO THE LATEST VERSION OF THE USDA PLANT HARDINESS ZONE MAP. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL MAINTENANCE AND WATERING OF ALL PLANT MATERIAL UNTIL SUBSTANTIAL PROJECT COMPLETION OR OWNER AND ENGINEER/ARCHITECT ACCEPTANCE OF ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS, WHICHEVER IS LATER. 6. DO NOT INSTALL PLANT MATERIAL WHEN AMBIENT TEMPERATURES MAY DROP BELOW 32DEGREES F (0 DEGREES C) FOR MORE THAN 24 HOURS. DO NOT INSTALL PLANT MATERIAL WHEN TEMPERATURES OVER 100 DEGREES F WITHOUT WRITTEN DIRECTION FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. DO NOT INSTALL PLANT MATERIAL WHEN WIND VELOCITY EXCEEDS 3D MPH. 7. IN ALL AREAS TO RECEIVE SOD, PLANTING BED PREPARATION, MULCHING, FERTILIZING AND PRE —EMERGENT APPLICATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH INDUSTRY STANDARDS. B. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE HIS/HER EFFORTS SO THAT THE SITE CAN BE SODDED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE FOLLOWING RE —SPREAD OF TOPSOIL. 9. ALL PLANTING BEDS (SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVERS) SHALL RECEIVE 3" AVERAGE DEPTH OF RIVER PEBBLES LANDSCAPE ROCK. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A 5—FOOT DIAMETER RING OF NATURAL COLOR HARDWOOD MULCH WITH STEEL EDGE AROUND ALL TREES PER DETAIL. 11. PLANT QUANTITIES IN PLANT SCHEDULE ARE FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY AND ARE NOT GUARANTEED. QUANTITIES ON PLAN WILL PREVAIL IF DISCREPANCIES OCCUR. 12. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO MARK ALL TREE LOCATIONS AND LAYOUT ALL OF PLANT MATERIAL IN THE FIELD FOR APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLANTING UNLESS APPROVED OTHERWISE. 13. SHRUBS ARE NOT TO BE LOCATED CLOSER THAN 2 FEET TO CURB OR SIDEWALKS. PERENNIALS / GRASSES ARE NOT TO BE LOCATED CLOSER THAN ONE FOOT TO CURB OR SIDEWALKS. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PLANT THREE BE FOR OWNER / ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO PLANTING THE REMAINDER OF THE TREES ON SITE, 14. ALL LANDSCAPING TO BE INSTALLED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE REGULATIONS. DEMONSTRATIDN SHALL ILLUSTRATE A COMPREHENSIVE UNDERSTANDING OF INFORMATION INCLUDED IN THE PLANTING DETAIL AND SPECIFICATIONS. 15. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS NOTICE FOR APPROVAL OF PLANT LAYOUT AND SAMPLE TREE PLANTINGS. 16. STAKING AND GUYING OF TREES PER NATIONAL NURSERY STANDARDS. 17. SWEEP AND WASH ALL PAVED SURFACES. REMOVE ALL DEBRIS RESULTING FROM LANDSCAPE OPERATIONS. 18. GUARANTEE ALL WORK FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR BEGINNING OF THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE. MAKE ALL REPLACEMENTS PROMPTLY AS PER DIRECTION OF OWNER/ENGINEER. TREE PLANTING 1.0 Na sPaLE MULCH LAVER PROVIDEA6 SIDEWALK EDGE wIFEFREN \ MULCH —III—= - -- i III= —III=III=III=III—III=III III S° DEEP WELL, BLEND TO FINISHED GRADE. FINISH GRADE BACK FILL WITH NATIVE SOIL HOLE SIZE zX WIDTH OF ROOTBALL. II LOOSEN SOIL Sx WIDTH OF FOOTBALL. WATER SETTLE. -... .. SIDES of PLANT PIT SHALL ix BE SCARIFIED AND SLOPING NOTE zX 1. CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN NOT TO DAMAGETHE SHRUB OR ROOTFALL WHEN REMOVING IT FROM ITS CONTAINER 2 PRO KEN OR CRUMBLI NO ROOT BALLSWILL BE REJECTED. 3 PRUNE ALL EAD OR DAMAGED WOOD z D TO PLANTING SR HRUB GROUNDCOVERRPLANTING 1.0 Na s�aLE MIN. 1" REVEAL ON ALLPAVED SURFACES, INCLUDING CURBING. GRADE FOR MATERIAL DEPTH AND REVEAL NO EXCEPTIONS PRE EMERGENT HERBICIDE GRANITE♦DECORATVE ROCK PER LANDSCAPE LEGEND =1 H H I—III=1 I- s CA WOVEN POLYPROPYLENE - — - FABRC WEEDBARRER20YR PROVIDE GROUND ANCHOR PINS NOTE PER INDUSTRY STANDARDS 1. APPLY PRE EMERGENT HERBICIDE PER LABEL DIRECTIONS AND RATE 4 NERT GROUND COVER 1.0 Na sraLE DEEP x 0° I FILL WE CULTIVATED NATURAL MULCH EDGE SURVEY NOTE: 1.0 NO SCALE T. THIS SURVEY WAS COMPLETED BY KALEB J. KADELBACK, RPLS 570713, AT NORTHNESTERN SURVEYING AND ENGINEERING, INC. THE DESIGN OF THIS PROJECT IS BASED ON A TOPOGRAPHIC AND BOUNDARY SURVEY PROVIDED TO r REGA ENGINEERING BY THE CLIENT. REGA ENGINEERING ACCEPTS NO RESPONSIBIURY FOR ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS OF TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES / AND ANY NEGOTIVE AFFECTS SAID TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY HAS ON THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL NECESSARY ELEVATIONS AND HORIZONTAL CONTROL BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. ROCKET GROVE, REGA TACK COTTAGE GROVEOVE,, MN. TD2� L 1.01 K ET ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE DETAILS BDI DID CHENEY RD.. SUITE A 'engineering! LINCOLµ IEBRASKA SBS12 architects I 02012023 uort.+B+aS+z I& surveying) & MLENK Real People. Real Solutions. MEMORANDUM Date: 02/09/2023 To: Amanda Meyer, PE From: Mike Boex, PE Subject: Rocket Carwash Plan Review City of Cottage Grove, MN Project No.: ON1.129849 3507 High Point Drive North Bldg. 1 Suite E130 Oakdale, MN 55128 Ph: (651) 704-9970 Bolton-Menk.com This memo summarizes the review of preliminary site development documents submitted by REGA Engineering, dated 02/01/2023. Some comments below pertain to final plan submittal and can be addressed at that time. C1.00: 1. List the horizontal and vertical datums used on the project. 2. Modify "Sheet Notes" note #8 to state that the City of Cottage Grove's Standard Specifications for Street and Utility Construction shall govern for all improvements within right-of-way or public easement. The City of Cottage Grove's Standard Specifications for Street and Utility Construction is located here for reference: https://www.cottagegrovemn.gov/251/City-Standards 3. All Sheets: Depict the drainage and utility easement on the adjacent property near the southeast side of the parcel (see attached plat), in which new work is proposed. a. Construction of the apron and other surface work is proposed within the drainage and utility easement and is on neighboring property; please confirm coordination/permission is occurring with Target. 4. All sheets: be aware that the existing watermain along the southeast corner of the site continues on to the south and east should there be any impacts or shutdowns due to construction. Attached is a record plan of that watermain for reference. C1.02: 5. See previous comment about watermain and adjust removals accordingly. If desired, Cottage Grove Public Works can locate the existing watermain. 6. There is an existing pole sign that is noted to be protected but also has an "X" though it; please confirm intent. If the sign is to be protected, check with city planning staff to ensure the existing sign meets city code and can be reused. H:\C0TT\0N1129849\1_Corres\C_To Others\2023-02-09\129849 Plan Review 2023-02-09.docx Bolton & Mer Rocket Carwash Plan Review Page: 2 It is understood that a parking agreement is being developed with Target for employee parking. Additionally, it has been conveyed that some employees may park onsite; please confirm how this will work and if employees will need to go through the wash drive aisle to access the on -site parking. a. The turning movements on Sheet C1.09 appear to go through non -paved areas whereas the renderings seem to indicate some of this area may be stamped/colored concrete. Please adjust the site layout plan accordingly. b. If employees will park on Target property, consider a sidewalk for pedestrian use to the building. 8. Clarify the use of the concrete areas between the parking area and the car wash drive entrance. c1 n6. Provide additional spot elevations at the entrance tie-in points. Demonstrate that drainage near the area grate will be captured and will not bypass or leave site. C1.07: 10. It appears there is an existing sanitary service towards the rear of the building, attached to this memo is the previous site plan. Consider using this service if possible, or provide notes to remove the service and cap the existing wye. 11. Provide a sanitary cleanout every 100-If (minimum) and comply with Minnesota plumbing code. C1.08: 12. Sheet C1.02 has a note indicating the valve on the existing service line should be protected for use with the new water line. However, on this sheet a new 4" service is shown to connect in a new location. Based on the old site plan (attached to this memo), a 6" service is available for connection; consider connecting to the existing 6" service if possible. 13. A concrete hydrant access pad should be provided at each hydrant per city standard detail STR- 37. 14. Hydrant locations will be reviewed by the City's Fire Marshall. 15. The Department of Labor and Industry will review utilities on private property; please review applicable plumbing code for compliance of the stormwater system and connection to roof drains. 16. An HDPE storm service is labeled on multiple drawings within this plan set, but the record utility drawings (attached) indicate RCP pipe. There is a note to connect the proposed HDPE to RCP; please correct pipe type labels for consistency (RCP or HDPE for the existing service). Provide a detail for the proposed HDPE to RCP connection. It is preferred that a manhole be provided at a connection of dissimilar pipe materials; alternatively, RCP pipe could be provided in that location to avoid a manhole. 17. Although not labeled, it appears a 90-degree bend is proposed on the 12" HDPE storm service. Bends on small diameter lines are not recommended and a manhole is preferred for maintenance. Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer. Rocket Carwash Plan Review Page: 3 natnilc- 18. The City of Cottage Grove's standard detail plates should be used for all applicable items in public right-of-way or easements. They can be found here for reference: https://www.cottagegrovemn.gov/251/City-Standards 1-1.01: 19. The City Forester will review the landscape plan for details related to tree species and planting locations. List the following restrictions on the plan sheet and ensure they are applied to the proposed plan and the landscape contractor follows them during installation: a. Deciduous trees should be located a minimum of 5' off any utility pipe b. Coniferous trees should be located a minimum of 15' off any utility pipe c. No tree should be located within 10' of a hydrant or 15' from a streetlight d. No trees should be located within a storm pond HWL e. No trees should be located within a storm pond's 20-ft access route, and no coniferous trees within 5' of the 20' pond access route f. No coniferous trees within 20' of a proposed sidewalk/trail g. No deciduous trees within 5' of sidewalk/trail 20. Due to the restrictions outlined above, there appears to be at least one tree that should be adjusted. 21. Please ensure the trees are depicted and planted on private property and not within the existing drainage and utility easements. a. Remove the proposed tree in the southeast corner of the site as it would be within the utility easement. 22. Please depict all new surface features such as traffic signs, proposed lights, and hydrants on the landscape plan to help identify potential conflicts. Architectural Sheets after 1-1.01: 23. Not reviewed as a part of this engineering memo. Stormwater: 24. HydroCAD Model: a. The HydroCAD model was run for a 20-hour duration. Please extend the run time to demonstrate the 48-hour drawdown requirement is met for the underground basin. b. The HydroCAD model simulates the 100-year precipitation as 7.2 inches in a 24-hour period. Please update the model to use 7.4 inches of precipitation for the 24-hour 100- year storm (consistent with NOAA Atlas 14). 25. Underground Infiltration Basin: a. Sumps: Please include sumps on the first storm structure(s) upstream of the proposed underground infiltration basin. b. Label HWL and EOF: Please label the plans with the expected High Water Level (HWL) and surface Emergency Overflow (EOF) for the underground infiltration basin. Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer. Rocket Carwash Plan Review Page: 4 c. Avoid Compaction: Please include notes on the plans outlining how to stage construction and use low -impact earth moving equipment to avoid compaction of the soils under the infiltration system in order to improve the likelihood of successful infiltration. 26. Soil borings are required in the vicinity of proposed infiltration basins. Borings are needed to identify soil conditions and the presence of groundwater or bedrock. Soil borings should extend a minimum of 3 feet below the lowest constructed elevation of proposed stormwater infiltration systems. 27. Water Quality: The MIDS model was used for water quality analyses. The existing and proposed MIDS models use very similar pervious and impervious acreages (Table 1). Sheet C1.00 lists proposed impervious of 27,543 sq ft (0.63 acres) which is less than the 0.71 acres input to the proposed condition MIDS model. Please verify that the pervious and impervious acreages in the MIDS models are correct and consistent with the plans, the stormwater narrative report and the HydroCAD models. Table 1. MIDS Model Acreages Land Cover MIDS Existing (acres) MIDS Proposed (acres) Pervious 0.26 0.27 Impervious 0.72 0.71 Total 0.98 0.98 28. Rational Storm Sewer Design: On -site storm sewer should be sized to a minimum 5-year rational method design. Submit design calculations for the storm sewer system and a drainage area map showing each catchment with manholes and catch basins labeled. Include individual pipe segment velocities with calculations for review. Trunk facilities should be analyzed and designed to accommodate the 100-year ponded discharges plus 5-year rational flows from areas that enter the trunk to be carried to the next storage area downstream. a. Pipe sizes and slopes should be selected to provide a minimum open channel velocity of 3 feet per second. b. Maximum storm sewer velocities should be kept at 10 feet per second or less. c. When changing pipe sizes in structure, match crown of pipe elevations instead of inverts. d. Please show storm catch basin IDs, pipe sizes, grades, elevations, and drainage areas on the plans consistent with the rational design tables. 29. Testing: The City will require post -construction testing to verify the infiltration rates and drawdown periods of the filtration basins. 30. Models: Please note that digital copies of the final version stormwater models and shapefiles or CAD drawings of existing and proposed drainage areas are to be submitted to the city once the review and revision process is complete Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer. 30" RITUMINWS WE COURSE 2341 6 0° CLASS 5-100X CRUSHED LIMESTONE 01 All *fading, PAII19, s, dewalk, and Leff AAtall,shmeat shah be to 12 0' COMPACTION TREATMENT *,codance wt th Mn/DdT spec, £, cat, Ons (1958 Ed,Uon). 02 pemove ail black dirt and bail, table mater,al from under dr,ves and roadways w,th,n 3, of fl Pal pavement grade 03 Ali er control measures shown on the plans must be lastalled pr,or to cwmencemant of gradiag operat, ons and ma,nta,nad until all s altered on the site have been restm'etl. .04 Pi a<e any bales around cdtch ba%ln% after they are chostraChAd and aF_a nt,l all ar as disturbed have been restored OS All nareaibaltered because of construct,on most be restored with seed nd d, scetl mulch, sod, wood fiber blanket, or be hard surfaced two weeks after coCpI t,- of LaOtr—on O6 Trees and stomps shall be hauled from the sl to Bur, al of tree. or stumps on the It, will not be allowed. UNDER PARKING LOT oT Topton Shan be saivalp... stockpIl. for furore Use A m, mmum of four inches of topso,I shall be placed on all areas disturbed by the onstroct,on PAVEMENT SECTION OB All embankment .onstruct, on shall he camp cted to 11% standard Proctor density Compact,on shall be obla, ne4 ,n 1, fts an that no part of the lift will Nave less than 95X dans,ty 09 1111 under bul id, ngs %hall be canpacted to meet $o,I Eng,neers dat, ons }+ 10 Thecocrete curb and gutter shall be R-612 11 P1 eld verify all ax,st, ng sewer and wetermaln elevations and l ocat,on5 NOU fy Eng, neer of any tll screpanc, es 12 Cooped trenches beyond the on, i d, n9 Units to 95% and 100% Standard Proctor 0eas,ty for sabgrade below top 3 feet and top 3 feet of trench spect,vely ' 13 The Contractor shall contact all otil tty companies and M1IVA sa,d ampani es locate ail uU 1, ties ( bl,c and mD c pu private) before any _______ ___ Vs �W construct)on stall begin getter and sldewalk shall De —I F i-0 Partl and cement concrete for noPo and a, 1 3900 ps, m, nl m 28 days cgnpre%si ve strength w, th 5 0% a,r 4 — M entra,m na Concrete aggregates shall be tree of nrg,N,, ,mpor,UnH, • hett, sN le or other deletar,00s substances ® • C_ Z1t +mosr __ 16 Prefornetl expansion SolAt, os, ng II ,xh th,ckness sNaii be placedfaecesend of curb radlos, at ,tersect lens and�'al1 16 Cont...t,on loots shall be spaced at to foot ,ntervali ,n the curb and gutter l ` nozusr ro sues a I� MOVAE D GUTTER 11 Prior to placement Of apgre9ate base and pavement, the Contractor ' RB shall fbrn, Sh a tandem truck loaded wt th a rot nlmbm of t-0 tool to check 1 5 ( a a t to removedean' replace) VIIN saUsfactoofit spots Soft to- cwmsetoo suD d ry rooter, al before pleU ng subgrade or base preparat,o Topography and Boundary Survey prove tletl by Lottage Grove Plans �j 19 No son bur, ngs prov,ded SubOratle so,is assueled to be adequate for PIP oseawnstrbctlon 1 I'. 1 ipar'� pe:Isrcm IA,�eraa PROPOSED BUILDING FLDDR E u j/ 1• 1 II ti--, n_ _ BRACE I.D.AT i•N `� �. � FLOOR ELEV 0 --h— 0 laAE LOW AREAS icon x,reR Nalry 10 SEDIMENTATION AR RGan i 1/2 CLEROCK CONTROL ABRIC 0 00 0 0 0 2 4 U fl l O O 2 0 \\\\\\ 9 w°� III II In 1ARPWO L ON EROSION CONTROL SECTIONTola —A oA F (AT DRIVES e e OE of FAeRIc a�REVN) E E`UTTITER c SILT FENCE DETAIL �aae m ' �_ u LEGEND ME i _ g ems= MH O MANHOLE a A aaafMEwr °a _ CS O CAT BASIN TO P OF CASTING . � � AM � �.... ��� _—__ — — — — FIELD VERIFY ""RANT LOCATION J;4 HYDRANT �I ACE ANN MUM 5 REH ND CURB EAST STORM SEWER N SANITARY SEWER ElAsN O CV GATE VALVE NV INVERT ` 9oa ..-.-_.. _-__________ bCRAINACE ARROW 'In' EXI511NO ELEYAitON Q. _ N R TOVR _ - _ _ —__ _ _ - - EWXSTINORISPN�IT.1l 5 IEN — — ELSE BORED GAS LILAC SOWER R TOW9TapDy taken from proposed T RUR ED TELEPHONE LNE grades and uU l,U es for Cottage —ry — BURIED TELEV15101. LINE Drove Plana F, eitl ver,fY ail s EROSION CONTROL 0 ----- ivz__-___.-------____._--------------.__._______ grades and uU llU es �o ao 960 PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED ELEVATION (PAVEMENT OR -- x90 --- — — --- --- -- -- --- — — — ---- --, --- ---- -- - Scale in feet GUTTER ELEV UNLESS OTHERWSE NOTED) (/ � PROPOSED PAVEMENT COPY COTTAGE GROVE PLAZA 951.24 -jj,00 S 00- 4W 52 05 7 T -W- 7 1110, C.D z- L Q LJ el 00 X": , I'z z zBLOCK .... . . --- --- qp 4 IhIl bl-- WESTWOOD CG PI... COTTAGE' COTTAGE GROVE PLAZA UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS 1990 1 im RICHARD PEDERSON MAYOR WILLIAM A. BUTH COUNCILMEMBER JACK DENZER COUNCILMEMBER LYLE PUPPE COUNCILMEMBER JILL BERNDT SEACRIST COUNCILMEMBER KEVIN D. FRAZELL CITY ADMINISTRATOR JACK W. CLINTON ATTORNEY LES BURSHTEN DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS INDEX 1. TITLE SHEET & LOCATION MAP 2. .SITE PLAN & STORM SEWER SCHEDULE 3. SANITARY SEWER & WATER MAIN PLAN 4. SANITARY SEWER PROFILES 5. STORM SEWER PLAN S. STORM SEWER PROFILES ...arm i-�,..�i RECORD PLAN CONTRACTOR: HYDROCON INC. 11 ,6 a ®80NESiR00. ROSENE. ANDERUI( a. BO.,., : BONESRtDO, RDSENE ANDERUK k ASSOC., INC, COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA COTTAGE 6ROYE PLAZA ASSOCIATES. INC. IS.. °LA6 w Enginam^s 4 Arcnitecb lei.-..,Y. T! �,n,.A! xPa" o st aaw, Nm�mot�_ onh: �uur io., isso caw. aersa UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS e ISLAY AVENUE o q ISLAY AVENUE r r o 18.4 l- R'RG.P '`n ii l8'R.C.P ,;.1.1 ' r t6.6 T SCALE IN FEET PROPOSED BUILDING A ! s4R EXISTING SANITARY SEWER —'—'— EXISTING WATER MAIN ` ,� j \ 14• / o0T8'RCY} EXISTING STORM SEWER mi i � � '--�t\\ /// rrs-Evxsa Pae \\\ \�/ - .>2]0 _ EXISTING CURB B GUTTER 90 MH' MH-G / i GA— „ \ �MH I� 8"PY.C. PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER \\// IN \ \ -24� IB'D.I.P. / v *\ 2� / 7 PROPOSED WATER MAIN 6341 'b 'J -. I.6 SS -I_ 12"RC.R l03.1 \ '� PROPOSED STORM SEWER I � \ � rSS i5-- T— PROPOSED CURB a GUTTER ( ✓~' \\ \\ �/ /' / PROPOSED BUILDING \y AGE \gs.( I. i �✓ l l 40 34 1 / N\ I ' V46.T 36.6'Y 7 / SS-3 \ -18 "iyKr r*.E sro /z 424 t �� b SS-6 53-4, /F. / 4 95-z i / nHA. SS-9 �\ \; SS.e au— s5e \ SS -II /All .63N 68.TI. a' ss ,a»a 8 R,9a a eo2.63 m E � RECORD PLAN + "."CIA BONESTROO, RDSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOC, INC. -' ®BONEsrreoo, RosEHE, nnoERurc x e COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA COTTAGE GROVE PLAZA nssoolAres,Ie90 e Engineers & Arch't"ts z .PPreovo St. aam. NV to o°re: auLv Io Isso ca.,a. 4ez34 UTILITY IMPROVEMENf3 6 ISLAY AVENUE m �� 11 ISLAY AVENUE i III6 TEE 19 xS"TEE Ii 23-s D,R .� `a SIB 6 TEE IB"xB TEE -' � /. UG G.V.a BO% DI.P IB"x8 TEE HYD.-BIi.25 �.� G..a Box 9 IlB PEN eGV aso. YD 812.5? a FLU. I.F_ _ _EI,-39G 3 LOGE ]8"HGP _ _ R B'P w. M. T ~ � ~�''+ 6• "J_ — _--- -- -- —� ----INSTALL SAL—E018"BY. 9 BOX - M 9'-I/a BEND \`. B x 8"PEDUCER' 2"CgiPORAi ION STOP 2"TYPE KCOPPER/ \ 7 2'CURB STOP aBC% \ A SALVAGE 120-fi D.I.P GATE VALVE PROPOSED BUILDING 828 ' n 6"D"TEE -6IP GQ- I .00% \\ - - / \\ / 8'x6'TEE fi \ G V B BO% l / \\ 6'PLU6 SALVAGE 386-IB'D I9 \~ Q..\\\// \ by8: I8 BUTT VALVE / Box CONNECT TO EXIST W/ 18*'-1/8 BEND ;;;VVVa 1 e aok `--- PROPOSED BUILDING a"- 1/1 SEND / 6•TFE R C N 18'x ®, CRtl35 ----__ S"G.. G, D% HYDE O'x 6'REGUCER 6 CN D PD �,•. $Np� L.._ _ J 1p�\i112.31 CUT i .a...( SALVAGE.)10 848-8•D..P �` \\ \ // �J. LS/ �Q / UT -IN /1 8'x 6'TEE 8 ,-6, a /88EN0 CUT- IN 8"x6"WYE --�.. ! 5"-6'D.tP �1046" P �\� fool -6"CASP•riO OD%-6'GV.S BOX 8G.V BOX r, -1 HYD.-81I.e? HY.-811.76 `l- f SAVAGE a REINSTALL IB x fi TEE P HTDRANT \ f E TEE J ES 6 Ds SALVAGE. B Rt."ALI 4% T' \ b G a sox \ \ / HYD. 81\ la' x8"TEE 2.82 e �\ ? � I \ \ / / �� x 1a/ / S" x T E— `- 1/I6 BEN. B x 6"TEE C.I. SADDLE, 14 RISER, B Q y / IN* a' DID-\ - IO-6"D.I.P 25'-6"CJ-S.P @ L00% Q / 6'y0V e a ��- �� 6 G Y. a Box \ 0 END INVERT AT EL.600..4 D.-..a,. �� �\ Y6-S12,06 B0; 0 50 I.. TPLUG a .V SGALE N FEET A B x B TEE // 6"6v. a SO% BiEE / 25 6"DI. P. PLUG ' PVG' EXISTING SANITARY BE ER J9 g/ 4 P /a / /ea EXISTING WATER MAIN S + 00 i T8 RGP EXISTING STORM SEWER �I \ CUT -IN a° x 6"WYE, 3'RISER 8 / EXISTING CURB 8 GUTTER 18'' 6"G1.9Ad@ I.00 e rEE e /Q' PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER e68 2I0' 6 SIP G MR I 6. PVC . / a89 \ �� �^+ B D1.P PROPOSED WATER MAIN R� \� \ Y TEE SS-1- 12 RA.R PROPOSED STORM SEWER 6 0xa*, q.. b 6''Do PROPOSED CURB 8 GUTTER HYD-S .Sa, "xe TEE / 8 V a BOX '�� FX•yy\ — CUT- IN 1, x 6' p. 3\ 14'-6'6.EP@I.00% CUT -IN TO EX. MH. NOTEI. ALL DIP OTHERAD I.P $HALLMHAVE O] 5'RMIN. COVER. exa TEE IS 6'D.IP / NUt( 8'GV B BOX _ 8'"-I/a BEND l _ - ' \ HYD ROS.]9 �\ D + 9D / RECORD PLAN' • V �" # ®BONEETROo, RD6ENE. ANDERUH & *a""I °rm. rCUT-IN 8".6"WYE, 7'RISER 10-6"CJS.P. QG I.C) // — BE —, RONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOC., INC. COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA COTTAGE GROVE PLAZA ,. AGSOGATEB, INC. 1900 .m=., Aplw s <f'neere EN s aFGN¢ects Bi Paul MnnesotaJULT 10, 1990 a8234 UTiLtPV 1MPROVEMENYB T a G,. tF y8a3Y - EXMH,-2 8 10 Ek'. MH-5 EX MIf 4 '.._ Ek.MH 3 BQ] ]I .809 43 $� ' 805.88b4 :.. . , :. , _. _,.--..,..-.-..___ _ 0+90 CUT IN I 5+60 CUT-4N 2�90 CUT -IN ]'R I Soo I} CUT -IN I j 10+40 : --- 790 _ -.: E%. 3 79' B" ;- P Y C 0,41 % :. —""- Eka56._..Ru.c.�,D:Sa% —�! '., - 790 EX.: 339 8 PVC �a D.40% 760 no ry - + II i ICJ 9 8 Y i 6 a 2 k: b EJ( jAH-I : MH-i : MH 2 809.14 MH-3 609.09 : MH-4 ' 809,23 8 l 0 809. 04 : 809. 64 810 LOWER TO j 14''RCP i i 2'RC P. i 800 14R :.. 5 D P .- 800 ". .. 790 790 9I 780 3 350-15" RCP CL 9 Q O,I6% 233`r i5 RCP CL 5 Q 01,15,% 244 15 RCP! CL 5 CA 0.1494 24I '^ 15"R.C,P C S@,Q 2 P 780 x CUY--4N:TO EX MH a I 10 MHi6: 808.96 MH-S D - BOO , 0 MN- i 809s4 ! 810 !. BOe.:Sa _ 810 - �_Hy B00PLe.11rvc1u6NF4L7 .:. 800 . 27518`PVC. (tD 0.3]% 275'-i6'PVC a�O.47% 790 i :... _. :.. ...:.. 790 ,.. a-.,. N ;.. N I2.7�'OUTSIDE DROP 780 m + i 7$ O ?., fi 9 4 :RECORD PLAN o � - - 7 14 9 b4tt A560t'IATE3, INC. ,1990 ocean BONESTR00 ROSENE, ANDERUK & ASSOC., INC. 9 Eero dt AtchiP¢Cis COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA couu. nersa COTTAGE GROVE PLAZA .� UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS 4 s ' I ISLAY AVENUE ai ISLAY AVENUE l / i r 7-4; CONSTRUCT_ SS 21 OVER_ EX TS- R C:P. y CONSTRUCT SS-190VFR E%. 15'RCP s S CONNECT 48��RC.P. T EX SS-3 ,�-SAI�GE 45'-IS"R.GP. PROPOSED BUILDING / -SALVAGE 6612"R. C.P. — p�l "Er.sSl2 SAUVAGFI I'-I2°RC.P 2_----- -1 Y ' �E _.SALVAGE 16$-4Q R.C.P. \ / CONSTRUCT SS-130VE E%.46"R.C.P.\S- /s '� l E62_ � v PROPOSED BUILDING �3-5�„�. \.•.\\\2 LSD �� i/ / �\ \\ S-16A 4s CONSTRUCT SS -I OVER EX.48"R.C.P \ / Q` 3 Pam/ �, 2 O y' Ie y a to — � laD SCALE IN FEET 4 55-3a '\\ `.fi'-12" 2 C EXISTING SANITARY SEWER E%ISTING WATER MAIN RO P> EXISTING STORM SEWER / (`\ \� �� /6'-12" /;/ — EXISTING CURE & GUTTER sp; \` / MR.' 8' PYC. PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER \ / d t PROPOSED WATER MAIN SS-1 12"RCP pROP09E0 9TORM SEWER y PROPOSED CURB 8 GUTTER .9y � RECORD PLAN'S:� G 60NESMOO, ROSENE, ANDERIIK & ASSOC., INC. COTTAGE GROVE MINNESOTA - COTTAGE GROVE PLAZA ®DONE Tft00 ROStnE I,N�JERLiH k n n�SOGATES inC. Engmeera & Arch'tects S � st. Fam u�""�,oto <a=aa UTILITY IA+PROVEMENTS s NORTH - 20 3D i — s I "I I ' I i G I I ' I �I a I I o I I I I I I i z i I i i �• i D im I I c", I — — I I m I o IL— I' — I � STACKING ANALYSIS NORTH ROCKET CARWASHREGA TACKCOTTAGE GROVE, MN. r1 10T TD2�STACKING ANALYSIS PLAN V � - . ENGINEERING ' '� ' ' ' C OLD CHENEY RD.. SUIIE A 'engineering' UNC0.N. NERRASKA BASt] 02012023 „o2„R,.,,z &surveying al'C It@CtS