Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-02-05 City Council Regular Meeting Packet1 COTTAGE GROVE CITY COUNCIL February 5, 2025 12800 RAVINE PARKWAY SOUTH COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 55016 COUNCIL CHAMBER - 7:00 PM 1 Call to Order 2 Pledge of Allegiance 3 Roll Call 4 Open Forum 5 Adoption of Agenda 6 Presentations A Accacia Masonic Lodge No. 51 Donation and Presentation Staff Recommendation: Accept and approve the donation of six Fire Suppression tools ($6,000 value) from the Accacia Masonic Lodge No. 51. B Police Officer Badge Pinning and Swearing-In Ceremony Staff Recommendation: Recognize Officer Lauden Rinzel, Officer Anna Weiss, Officer Marshal Freeman and Officer Tyler Harris. C February 2025: Black History Month Staff Recommendation: Proclaim February as Black History Month. 7 Consent Agenda A City Council Special Meeting Minutes (01/08/2025) Staff Recommendation: Approve the January 8, 2025, Special Meeting Minutes. B City Council Regular Meeting (01/22/2025) Staff Recommendation: Approve the January 22, 2025, Regular Meeting Minutes. C Public Services Commission Meeting Minutes (11/18/24) Staff Recommendation: Approve the November 18, 2024, Public Services Commission meeting minutes. D Planning Commission Meeting Minutes (12/16/2024) Staff Recommendation: Accept and place on file the minutes from the December 16, 2024, Planning Commission meeting. E Approval of Rental Licenses Staff Recommendation: Approval the issuance of rental licenses to the properties listed in the attached table. F Towing and Impounding of Vehicles Service Agreement Staff Recommendation: Authorize executing a service agreement for towing and impounding of vehicles with South East Towing, Inc. G Receive Fuel Pricing for 2025 Staff Recommendation: Receive the 2025 State Fuel Contract pricing under State Contract number 263096. 2 H Sale of Surplus Property Staff Recommendation: Authorize Public Works to advertise and sell surplus property on Cranky Ape and/or MNBid. I Utility & Engineering Building Change Order #5 Staff Recommendation: Approve Change Order #5 for the Utility and Engineering Building in the amount of $23,993.66. J Ice Arena Space Programming and Concept Design Staff Recommendation: Authorize service agreement with Oertel Architects for Ice Arena lobby/office programming and concept design services. K 2025 Hamlet Pond Maintenance – Quote Award Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution 2025-012 awarding the 2025 Hamlet Pond Maintenance project to the quote supplied by New Look Contracting, Inc. in the amount of $97,592.00, and the appropriate officials are hereby authorized to sign all necessary documents to effectuate these actions. L Call for Sale of 2025A General Obligation Improvement Bonds Staff Recommendation: Adopt 2025-011, Providing for the sale of the $10,000,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2025A M Prairie Dunes – Final Plat, Development Agreement, and Development Plans Staff Recommendation: 1) Adopt Resolution 2025-013 approving the Final Plat for Prairie Dunes 1st Addition. 2) Approve the Prairie Dunes 1st Addition Development Agreement with Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC, with minor modifications as approved by the City Attorney. 3) Adopt Resolution 2025-014 approving the Prairie Dunes 1st Addition Development Plans dated December 13, 2024, prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., subject to final approval by the City Engineer in writing. 8 Approve Disbursements A Approve Disbursements 9 Public Hearings 10 Bid Awards 11 Regular Agenda 12 Council Comments and Requests 13 Workshops - Open to Public A MN Law Enforcement Support Office (MN_LESO) Participation Staff Recommendation: Authorize Cottage Grove Public Safety to continue participating in the Minnesota Law Enforcement Support Office program and the State Plan of Operation (SPO). B Police - Annual Use of Force Report Staff Recommendation: Receive the 2024 annual use of force report. C Police and Fire - 5-Year Strategic Plan Update Staff Recommendation: Receive the Police and Fire 5-year Strategic Plan update. 14 Workshops - Closed to Public 15 Adjournment 1 City Council Action Request 6.A. Meeting Date 2/5/2025 Department Public Safety Agenda Category Presentation Title Accacia Masonic Lodge No. 51 Donation and Presentation Staff Recommendation Accept and approve the donation of six Fire Suppression tools ($6,000 value) from the Accacia Masonic Lodge No. 51. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. Accacia Lodge 51 Dontation Fire Suppression Tools Council February 5 2025 To:Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From:Peter J Koerner, Director of Public Safety Date:January 28, 2025 Subject: ACCACIA MASONIC LODGE NO. 51 DONATION AND PRESENTATION Introduction Accacia Masonic Lodge is donating 6 life-saving fire suppression devices to the Cottage Grove Police Department. The devices are valued at $1000.00 per unit. These devices fit in the trunk of squad cars or other first responder vehicles, and they can dramatically reduce fire and water damage in enclosures like houses, garages, stores, or sheds. They are lightweight and easy to deploy just “pull the pin and throw it in,” Within 35 seconds, the fire is suppressed, and the temperature inside the enclosure drops over 1000 degrees, making it a safer environment to extract trapped firefighters or citizens. These devices will help save lives, and Accacia Masonic Lodge is proud to donate these to help make our community a safer place. The goal is to equip all police squads in Cottage Grove in the future. The Lodge already donated 6 fire suppression devices on May 1, 2024. Public Safety and members of the Accacia Masonic Lodge No. 51 will provide a brief presentation on the mission of the Masonic Lodge and the purpose of the donation. Recommendation Accept and approve the donation of six Fire Suppression tools ($6,000.00 value) from the Accacia Masonic Lodge No. 51. 1 City Council Action Request 6.B. Meeting Date 2/5/2025 Department Public Safety Agenda Category Presentation Title Police Officer Badge Pinning and Swearing-In Ceremony Staff Recommendation Recognize Officer Lauden Rinzel, Officer Anna Weiss, Officer Marshal Freeman and Officer Tyler Harris. Budget Implication N/A Attachments None 1 City Council Action Request 6.C. Meeting Date 2/5/2025 Department Administration Agenda Category Action Item Title February 2025: Black History Month Staff Recommendation Proclaim February as Black History Month. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. February 2025 Black History Month Proclamation PROCLAMATION February 2025: Black History Month WHEREAS: Black History Month is a time to reflect upon, honor, and celebrate the invaluable contributions of African Americans throughout history and the ongoing efforts to promote equality, justice, and freedom; WHEREAS: In 1926, Dr. Carter G. Woodson, a Harvard scholar, established the observance of African American History to reveal the contributions, achievements, and involvement of African American people in the development of our American democracy; WHEREAS:African Americans have played a vital role in shaping the cultural, economic, and social fabric of the United States, enriching our communities with their resilience, strength, and achievements in every field; WHEREAS:Minnesota is home to many prominent Black trailblazers, including Dr. Robert S. Brown, the first Black doctor from Minnesota; Lena Smith, Minnesota’s first Black woman lawyer; Neva Walker, the first Black woman elected to the Minnesota legislature; WHEREAS:The City of Cottage Grove remains committed to acknowledging the generations of African Americans who struggled against adversity, injustice, and discrimination in order to achieve equal rights in American society; WHEREAS:Black History Month calls our attention to the continued need to battle racism and build a society that lives up to its democratic ideals. We must reflect on our collective past, reveal its impact on present conditions and implement equitable solutions for a more just future; and WHEREAS:The City of Cottage Grove is proud to honor the history and contributions of African Americans in our community, throughout the state, and nation. NOW, THEREFORE, the Mayor and City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, hereby proclaim the month of February 2025 to be designated as Black History Month. Passed this Wednesday, the 5th day of February 2025. _____________________________________ Myron Bailey Mayor 1 City Council Action Request 7.A. Meeting Date 2/5/2025 Department Administration Agenda Category Action Item Title City Council Special Meeting Minutes (01/08/2025) Staff Recommendation Approve the January 8, 2025, Special Meeting Minutes. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. 2025-01-08 City Council Special Meeting CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE  12800 Ravine Parkway South  Cottage Grove, Minnesota 55016 www.cottagegrovemn.gov  651-458-2800  Fax 651-458-2897  Equal Opportunity Employer COTTAGE GROVE CITY COUNCIL January 8, 2025 12800 RAVINE PARKWAY SOUTH COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 SPECIAL MEETING - TRAINING ROOM - 5:00 P.M 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Bailey called the Special Meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. He stated we have a hard stop, as we have a Council Meeting tonight at 7:00 p.m. He thanked everyone for coming this evening, and noted State Representative Rick Hansen had sent a message to me and Commissioner Bigham, stating he was ill, so he’s not able to be here. Mayor Bailey said on behalf of the Council and the City, we really do appreciate all the service and support that we get from all of you, and we welcome you to Cottage Grove. This evening we’re going to talk a little bit about the progress that we’ve been making here in Cottage Grove over the years, some of the projects and things that we’ve been working at really hard. We’re also going to look at some of the high-priority items that are very important, on which we really want some added focus. I think all of you have met some of our team over here, our lobbyist firm, who’s representing the City of Cottage Grove; I believe they’re also representing Washington County, so they work well together. You have a packet in front of you, there are important things at the beginning, and then there are pieces that each of our different department directors are going to share with you at a high level; there are basically four things that we really want to make a point of discussing this evening. There are some other things in here that if you come across this legislative season and have questions about, you can just let us know. I just want to mention that Senator Judy Seeberger is aware of one thing, as we’ve been talking about this, and it’s one of our high-priority items that you obviously got across the line this last year, the Emergency Medical Service program. We didn’t qualify for any of the dollars on that round, but I do know that you’re still working hard with the rest of the team, and we’ll get into more of that a little bit later. It will obviously have a huge impact for both of the communities that you were able to get some funding for and hopefully, as things continue to move forward, it’ll trickle down to get to us locally. There were also changes from this last legislative session on the School Resource Officer law that allows us to keep that program in place. For those who maybe don’t know, we kept our School Resource Officer (S.R.O.) in the school here in Cottage Grove. We had kept it through the process while all the challenges were happening. Our relationship with the School District is very, very good. I know some communities were having some challenges with it, but we weren’t, so the changes that were made were very beneficial for everybody, but specifically for Cottage Grove. Some of the funds in areas where we do pick up some additional dollars that we want to continue to support, the Minnesota Investment Fund is very important to the City of Cottage Grove as is the Job Creation Fund. They’re really important for us because we like to say “tools in the toolbox”; so, when we have somebody who’s interested in moving to Cottage Grove or is looking for incentives or things that we can do to help, those particular programs have really helped us expand our local economy, specifically in our Business Park. As I mentioned earlier, you’re going to hear about the City’s four top legislative priorities: 1) 100th Street is a big one; 2) PFAS Resources, you’ll hear why we’re talking about that, though we’re getting our Water Treatment Facilities taken care of right now; 3) EMS Service that we talked about earlier; 4) Paid Family Leave and what effect that’s having on cities. There’ll be some other additional topics that we may cover, and if there are any questions on any of it from any of you, feel free to ask questions. So, without further ado, I think I’ll just say thank you for coming, thank you for enjoying our food from River Oaks, our chef there is amazing. Before I turn this over to Director Burfeind, we’ll start with quick introductions. City Council Special Meeting January 8, 2025 Page 2 of 15 2. ROLL CALL •Representative Wayne Johnson, newly elected to District 41A, which has half of Cottage Grove, then Denmark Township, and river communities up into Lakeland, Lake Elmo, and Grant. I was on the Cottage Grove City Council for a couple years and I was also County Commissioner for four years, and now I’m down at the House. I’m looking forward to listening and hearing about what we can do. •Senator Judy Seeberger, I’m in my first term, this will be my third session. I replaced the irreplaceable Karla Bigham, and I’m happy to keep working for Cottage Grove. •Senator Matt Klein, I’ve been in the legislature since 2017; with redistricting two years ago, I picked up a precinct in Cottage Grove, as well as some other cities on this side of the river. I serve as the Commerce Chair in the Senate and on Tax Committee as Vice Chair. I’m looking forward to hearing what your issues are today. •Karla Bigham, Washington County Commissioner, said I used to be in the Senate, and we have very good representation in the Senate. Obviously, I know these two guys in the House and Rick, so I’m very much looking forward to working with all three of these fine gentlemen. I appreciate being invited to this, I think it’s important to show the relationship between City, County, and State. The food is always fantastic from River Oaks. One more thing, we approved the 19A and 100th yesterday. •Monique Garza, Cottage Grove City Council, I’ve recently been reelected. •Dave Thiede, Cottage Grove City Council, I’ve been on the Council since 2010. •Myron Bailey, Mayor of Cottage Grove, this is my 16th, going into 17th year now as mayor of Cottage Grove. •Justin Olsen, Cottage Grove City Council, started in 2008, took a little break for a few years in 2016, then made a comeback in 2019, and was grateful to the voters of Cottage Grove for being reelected for another four- year term. Welcome to all of you, thank you for coming here, and congratulations to the newly-elected, including my colleague, Dave Clausen, to my right, who served our community proudly as a Public Safety professional for many years. I look forward to working with everybody and having a very productive year this year. •David Clausen, Cottage Grove City Council, I’m a former City employee, a police officer for many years; this is my first time holding an elected office. •Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator for Cottage Grove •Representative Tom Dippel, born and raised in Cottage Grove, grew up down on the Mississippi; went to Pine Hill Elementary School, Oltman Junior High, graduated from Park in 2000. I’m living back down on Grey Cloud Island, enjoying all the beauty of the City. •Brenda Malinowski, Finance Director, City of Cottage Grove •Ryan Burfeind, Public Works Director, City of Cottage Grove •Emily Schmitz, Community Development Director, City of Cottage Grove •Zac Dockter, Cottage Grove Parks and Recreation Director •Pete Koerner, Cottage Grove Director of Public Safety •Gretchen Larson, Cottage Grove Economic Development Director •Phil Jents, Cottage Grove Communications Manager •Tamara Anderson, City Clerk •Brandan Strickland, Larkin Hoffman •Julia Page, Larkin Hoffman Mayor Bailey said thank you and congratulations to our newly-electeds, both locally here but also up at the House; obviously, the Senate and Karla stayed the same. Before I kick it off to Ryan, who’s going to start us off on the top four legislative priorities, I’ll just again reiterate as we get into this, being the mayor, I’m not afraid to talk; if there is something you need that we can help support, whether it’s these projects or something that’s on the extras, if you will, up at the Capitol, please let us know. Let me know because if you need me to testify, I’m more than willing to do that, to talk about whatever the City Council Special Meeting January 8, 2025 Page 3 of 15 topic may be that’s relevant to the citizens of Cottage Grove that might help support what you’re trying to advocate for us up at the Capitol. With that, I’ll turn it over to Ryan Burfeind, Public Works Director. 3. A. 2025 Legislative Agenda Staff Recommendation: Receive an overview of the 2025 Legislative Agenda. County 19A & 100th Street Realignment Project Director Burfeind said our first legislative priority that I’m going to talk about is our County 19A and 100th Street Realignment Project Bonding Request. This is a joint project with Washington County, with a Bonding Request that we’ll hopefully be working together on, of $22.5 million. This is a project located in the south part of Cottage Grove; so, it’s kind of outside Highway 61 and 10. We have our growing, ever-expanding Business Park in that area. It’s very accessible, but it does only have really one access to Highway 61 and Jamaica Avenue, which has all sorts of issues at peak times, and traffic is really at capacity. We’ve been working on this project actually since 2018 with Washington County, starting with more of a high-level study and planning this route. I have a video on the next slide that really shows the details of the project. This is a really strong partnership with Washington County, they’re the lead agency on this project, but also with MnDOT due to that connection to Highway 61, and 3M, because it is largely 3M land that we will have to build this road through; 3M has been a very good partner, very supportive throughout the process, and there are other surrounding communities that were part of that overall planning study. I should mention the Business Park as a whole because it will be a new access for our Business Park, and all of those entities down there have been very supportive of this project as we work through it. Director Burfeind said I will switch to a video that we created, this is an animation we developed to really make this project come to life. This is something that does a much better job of showing what we’re trying to accomplish here in the south part of Cottage Grove. You can see it’s highlighting the project area there, south of Highway 61, and the starting point is going to be at the intersection of 100th Street and Jamaica Avenue, kind of right by the Renewal by Andersen facility; this is where it will tie in through the Business Park and we will get that new access. There are very many jobs in that area, so it’s a big supporter of those current jobs, but also it will be opening up additional land for development because we have a new access and a new capacity from a transportation perspective. This is the Mississippi River Trail Corridor, and we have these multiuse trails right now that have been on road, but we’ll have dedicated off-road trails for that, which will be much better from a safety perspective, and this expanded three-lane section that we will be constructing with the project. As you start to move east, we start to travel onto 3M land; its Miller Road today and it kind of becomes 100th Street and there will be an intersection. The key part of the project is a bridge crossing over the railroad tracks. There is no grade-separated crossing down there right now, at the 3M entrance it’s an at-grade crossing, which is definitely a safety concern; especially with the CPKC merger, there’s even more train traffic on that railroad. We’ll tie into Highway 61 with the roundabout; we have the roundabout that the County constructed in 2017, on the north side, and it’s been very beneficial for that north side of the highway. This will be on the south side so its definitely an important project down there for the community. I hope that it helps show what we’re trying to accomplish. I mentioned the Business Park, and it does open up this new land as well. There are two different aspects with growth of the Business Park: First is NorthPoint, that’s something that was approved and is under construction, 280 acres of logistic center, distribution center, with at least 1,200 jobs. Many of those buildings have tenants at this point. We also have 500 acres of new 3M land, that’s highlighted in red here on the screen; this will really allow development, and that’s really big for our community. This is land that 3M was pretty careful with, because when they had the incinerator, they wanted some buffer with that facility. With that incinerator closing down, they’ve really been open to the development of this land in Cottage Grove. To help facilitate that, our Community Development Department has undertaken a Small Area Plan at Highway 61 and Innovation; so, this is happening with the design of a new roadway because now we have this new area of Cottage Grove that has the opportunity for development, and we want to make sure it has the highest and best use. So, it kind of creates that roadmap for development of that area of the community. There was a Market Study done as well to make sure we have the right development, the right Land Use in that area; that Small Area Plan isn’t really meant to get into the issues and City Council Special Meeting January 8, 2025 Page 4 of 15 details and in the weeds. It’s really that high level what Land Use is the best for that area and making sure that’s working well with our new roadway. From a funding perspective, it’s a very expensive project as it’s a new roadway entirely across this property, but also that bridge alone is $10-to-$15 million. So, $47 million is the Total Project Cost; between the $11 million in local funds that we both have in our CIPs and then $13.6 million in grants that have been acquired to date, that funding gap is $22.5 million. So, with that $22.5 million, we would be fully funded and able to deliver the construction of the project. That’s very important because these grants have obviously timelines tied to them; so, if we are not able to start construction in that 2026-into-2027 timeframe, we’d actually risk losing that grant funding that has been acquired, which would be definitely detrimental to the project. The City and the County have both been really aggressive on that grant funding; you can see in bold the ones that we have received that make up that $13.6 million. Also, there’s a Regional Solicitation Application that the County put forth, and seven applications to the IIJA, those Federal grants as part of that ask. The project has scored very well, but there are very competitive grants, there might be 1,000 applications to a RAISE grant nationwide with maybe 20 projects getting funded. So, while we have scored well, it’s just a very competitive process to get that funding. I mentioned tonight we’re working with Washington County and supporting them in that Bonding Request. Director Burfeind asked if there were any questions before he moved on to the next priority. Representative Johnson said I’ve been following this for quite a while because I think was it 2020 or 2021 we first started having the meetings as far as this one, what would be down there. At that time, they’d say this was a ten-year project, we’re just starting to explore it, and I think a year or two exploded into we need it now. So, it’s very interesting to follow this, but so you’re saying if it’s not started, the project hasn’t started in 2026 or 2027, you’ll lose those funds, correct? Director Burfeind replied that’s correct, Representative. There are two different kind of dates for some of those, but that’s the timeframe we need to meet to be able to show that the project’s been committed and construction is starting. Representative Johnson asked so, is that just a portion of that $13 million or the whole $13 million? Director Burfeind replied that would be specifically the Minnesota Highway Freight Grant is what we would risk losing, which is $12 million; so, that’s the largest part of that funding. Representative Johnson asked so if our commissioner and also our senator and representative can help me a little bit here; if this isn’t done in 2025, which is our budget year, and it’s done in 2026 instead, when are those funds made available for projects like this so it’d still be qualified for, that the money would not be lost, if that makes sense. Commissioner Bigham replied if it’s approved, it’s fine because we would be sending the paperwork that the project’s going forward from our perspective. We’ve let the RFP out for engineering now, the County has. Representative Johnson said okay, so it would happen in a normal bonding year, which is next year, by the end of the session. Commissioner Bigham said but if it doesn’t happen, I’m going to start to sweat; I’m getting warm right now, but I’m not sweating, but we need it. If we wait another year, it’s going to be a problem. Representative Johnson said okay, thank you for that. You brought up the line item here, the project will include construction of a bridge over the railway for $11 million. Did you break that out for a certain reason? I guess what caught my eye is are there any funds available to working with, to make railroads more safe by bringing the cars away from? Commissioner Bigham asked grade separation? There is, but they don’t fund it very well at the State. Representative Johnson said okay, but what about at the Federal level, though, since it’s a railroad, they don’t? Mayor Bailey said it’s kind of like it was, but Ryan just was talking about the competitiveness. Commissioner Bigham said and remember, they’re private. Mayor Bailey said and my partner here at the County, with all due respect, I’ve been razzing Karla to say that what we’ve learned, what we’ve been going after the RAISE grant. And you can correct me if I’m wrong on this, is that we need to be further along in the true development phase of the project before we can score to that very, very top level for the RAISE grant. Like Ryan mentioned, we’re scoring high, but when you’re competing against all these other cities and counties and states around the country, it becomes difficult if we don’t have all of our ducks City Council Special Meeting January 8, 2025 Page 5 of 15 in a row that we can call it shovel-ready, basically. So, that’s where the comment that you made earlier about getting engineering and all that done is so crucially important because obviously, as you know, this road is a County Road. For the rest of you, we’re always just talking about this one piece, which is a total of $47 million. Eventually, this County Road will make its way all the way down to Grey Cloud Island for what will eventually be a park, maybe some development, and all that kind of stuff. Of course, we have another bridge that we’ll have to deal with once we get this thing kind of situated. It’ll be even more expensive. Representative Dippel said I think I’ve gone under that bridge like 15,000 times. Mayor Bailey said you can help us with that one, too, but that one is even more expensive than this bridge because you literally have to build a new track because it’s such a heavily-used rail, that you have to build a track that goes around it, build a new bridge, and then move the track back over to its normal spot. So, I’m not sure exactly how this works on the other one, but the number is pretty solid at this point from what we’re asking for, from a funding standpoint. Representative Johnson said okay, thank you. Director Burfeind said one final thing I should mention before I keep this moving is the Commissioner mentioned and that was a good point, the County has released an RFP, and we are working with the County to continue and complete final design, environmental documentation, and Right-of-Way acquisition in 2025; so, those are also things that we’ll have to fund as well. We want to keep the project moving, and we are committed to that. Commissioner Bigham said and one other thing, the $47 million is like all that he said, the environmental stuff, it’s the whole enchilada, and so there isn’t anything, any extras at all, that’s all in. Representative Johnson asked and that’s 2027 numbers? Director Burfeind replied yes, that does account for 2027 charges, correct. 2007 Consent Order Funding for Permanent Operations and Management of PFAS Treatment Director Burfeind said all right, our next legislative priority is really tied to PFAS in Cottage Grove, and as we’re moving into what’s going to be an O&M (Operations & Management) phase, we do have our two permanent treatment plants, one under construction and one that will start construction this summer. Just at a high level, very briefly, I want to talk about for everyone in the room just some of the brief history of PFAS and how we got to where we are today. It was in 2000 when PFAS was first discovered in our drinking water, and we were kind of in that hot spot, unfortunately, in the East Metro. After that, we kind of jump forward to 2017, that’s when we were really thrown into the fire. The Health Department lowered their health-based values (HBVs) for several PFAS compounds, and at the time, we had 11 wells; 8 of our 11 wells were over those new limits. We had a State of Emergency Declaration that summer, full outdoor water use bans, it was a very challenging summer. We delivered our first two Temporary Treatment Plants that summer, and we were able to, in about 60-to-90 days, have compliant drinking water. It was a huge effort, citywide, to accomplish that. Since that time, in 2018, of course, the 3M Settlement was finalized and agreed to and has that $850 million for the East Metro. As values have changed as the levels have risen and changed, we now have 7 Interim Treatment Plants at our individual well sites. So, you can see a couple pictures of them here; they’re basically just a little metal shed with some treatment vessels in them. They work for what we need them to, they do fully treat the water, but they’re definitely not built for the long term; they were meant to get us by until we can construct those permanent facilities. In those two permanent facilities, you can see this one right here is the Low Zone Treatment Plant, and this is actually a construction photo from earlier this month. So, we’re actually nearing completion, we’re looking to having that operational June 1, 2025, which will be a huge milestone for the City. We’ll continue to operate 5 of those Interim Treatment Plants after that one’s done. This is our Intermediate Zone Treatment Plant that’s actually going to be built kind of right behind the Central Fire Station; that’ll be the south side of 80th Street, kind of across from Park High School. They are two very large facilities, we’re doing everything we can to be the most cost effective but also making sure our needs are met for generations to come. The newest challenge is really related to the O&M Funding. We were notified at a working group meeting that we had with the PCA and DNR earlier last year, in May, that obviously inflation cost increases have changed, and there have been more wells that needed to be treated in all the communities due to the new MCLs that were released by the EPA. And that was really kind of like a landmark event; there hasn’t been a new MCL, which is a City Council Special Meeting January 8, 2025 Page 6 of 15 Federal requirement, for contaminated drinking water for at least a decade. When that was completed last year, that really set a hard deadline for the nation to be compliant for PFAS, and all that put together really ate away at our 3M Settlement Funds. We were notified that instead of 20 years of O & M, we were really getting down to just a few years of that O&M cost to cover these facilities. Cottage Grove, like the rest of the East Metro, we have a known source; it’s 3M contamination, that’s been proven, and the City has had assurances, we knew that even the 3M Settlement Funds would not last forever. Then there was a 2007 Consent Order that we were referred to that would pay for the O&M in perpetuity, but that is a concern for us, as that’s a a different mechanism. Settlement Funds the State has, and they’re available; the MPCA and the DNR govern those. The Consent Order, which was what we were referred back to when the Settlement Funds run out, is different, and the fact that 3M has to kind of agree to pay those bills and do that; so, that’s a big concern for us because as we look at these two new facilities, while we’re extremely grateful for that money to build them, we’re looking at somewhere around $2 million a year just for more of the basic maintenance and the media replacement. That’s not capitalization, and that’s not any long-term maintenance, replacing tanks and things like that after 20-or-30 years. So, as a City, I think we voiced that at that working group meeting that we definitely have a concern. Our City Council approved a letter at the end of December that was sent to the MPCA, that we shared with representatives and senators in this room, really requesting that hopefully by May 31, 2025, that we have more clarity on what will that transition look like. Because for a city of our size to take on that $2 million in maintenance, that’s a huge burden; our entire Water Utility Fund right now is $2.8 million a year. So, as we work through what that is, we have to look at about an 89% water rate increase in about a two-year time to pay for that. Representative Dippel said this might be a stupid question, but I wonder over time, so you said 20-or-30 years, there’d be a major maintenance; has anybody looked at studies of what PFAS chemicals with that fingerprint have made their way into the water and if that took a certain amount of time? And if it all goes into the water and then is functionally filtered out over time, is there a potential that it would be remediated? Director Burfeind replied that’s a great question, Representative, so that is up to them at a State level. They have been trying to look at it, but it’s a very hard thing to model; public groundwater modeling is done by the DNR and Department of Health and MPCA. Obviously, our source is the Woodbury dump site, right off of Keats Avenue. While I think that’s the goal is they would capture that PFAS with the wells that 3M operates, we have monitoring wells downstream from that that are 10, 15 years downstream and closer, and we’re still seeing those contaminants in the groundwater. So, while I think that could be a hope that this could change over time, I think it’s far enough out that it’s still a concern for us. Director Burfeind said and just getting back to that water rate increase, that would be a huge burden on our residents to have to fund that $2 million. Because if there’s any point where there’s a concern from 3M on reverting back to that Consent Order, these are real costs that we have to pay immediately; our power, watermain, all the different things, natural gas, that have to be paid, we would have to fund those. Doing some math with Brenda, our Finance Director, what that would mean for your typical single-family home, kind of standard indoor use, some exterior use, we’re looking at an increase from $124 to $234 a year just for kind of an average home. We’re not taking into account other water uses outside the home. So, it would be a major impact to our community. Really at this point it’s not anything legislative we’re looking for, it’s more just your support, as the MPCA and the DNR are trying to work through that Consent Order and basically where this takes us. He asked if there were any questions. Representative Johnson asked what’s the lifespan of this facility? Director Burfeind replied that’s a good question. It’s got different components, so the basic facility is the Tilt-up panels, all the concrete, that’s more like your 50-to-100 years. These costs that I show are the annual cost plus media replacement; so, the media that actually does the work and takes the PFAS out, that gets replaced every 4- to-6 years, but you have to plan for that cost, so that’s in the $2 million. The other big milestone is some of the tanks in there, at about 20 years it’s kind of a major rehab. So, you kind of have the annual costs, a major rehab every 20 years of the tanks, and then maybe like a roof and things like that, your HVAC system, but then the concrete Tilt-up panels is 50-to-100 years. City Council Special Meeting January 8, 2025 Page 7 of 15 Representative Johnson asked so is that $2 million used to prepare for that, or is that strictly outside of that? Director Burfeind replied so that is strictly the annual cost, plus the media replacement; so, that does not include what you would have to do for that kind of 20-to-30 year and then the capitalization as well, we’d have to plan for overtime. Mayor Bailey said so, basically, not the tanks at this point, but what goes in the tanks. So, the other thing, and I know Representative Dippel was making the comment, we’re actually, when both of our sites are up and running, the new ones, we’re using and correct me if I’m wrong, Ryan, we’re trying two different types of filters, if you will. One is cheaper than the other one, so we’ve been testing and working on what might eventually be less expensive than the GAC filter. Director Burfeind said I’ll just mention real quick the GAC, that’s kind of a tried-and-true one that we’ve been using for many, many years, and that’s in our initial facility. But we actually built it to convert to an Ion Exchange very easily and it takes the same media; the one near Park High School, that is Ion Exchange. We actually started operation on the first Ion Exchange PFAS Treatment Plant this last summer, so, our last two Interim Plants were Ion Exchange. Through the 3M Settlement, with those funds, we did a Pilot Study that showed Ion Exchange will work and it does work; so, we’re using it on an interim scale, and then that will be the permanent treatment for that water facility. Ion Exchange has been more expensive, but it’s flipped over the last few years with all the science and all the advancements; so, that’s actually a lower cost. Representative Dippel said that was going to be my next question: If this becomes more necessary all across the country, it will be mass produced, and when things are mass produced, costs go down, efficiencies are created, so is there an anticipation that it will continue to go down if you believe we hit a baseline? Director Burfeind replied I think over time, we hope that, like you said, with mass production, and that’s what we’re seeing even in the last few years that Ion Exchange has been more available and it has gone down. We have a big fear, though, that that is 6,000 water utilities across the country in the next 5 years need to do this. We talk a lot with different suppliers, and they are ramping up as fast as they can, but there’s a big concern they can’t meet the demand. But I think we’re concerned we’re going to see a spike and then hopefully a reduction after that. With that, I’ll turn it over to City Administrator Levitt. Funding for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Aid Administrator Levitt said I’m going to talk a little bit about EMS and our EMS Service. Now, it’s not my typical to start with a bar chart right off the bat, but some of you are very familiar with EMS Service and others are not. So, I’ll give you a little bit of background. Before 2015, the City of Cottage Grove when we delivered our ambulance service, they covered our operations, meaning our personnel, our people, our equipment, our ambulance replacements. Now, since then, every time the ambulance rolls out the door, we actually lose money. So, you might be asking, well, why is that? Well, it’s important to know because we have a Public Service Area (PSA); so, Cottage Grove also provides ambulance services to Newport, St. Paul Park, and Grey Cloud Island, and it may not seem like a big deal, but in the end, our taxpayers are actually the ones who are subsidizing the ambulance service to those communities. I’ll also put a plug that the City of Cottage Grove does not get any Local Government Aid (LGA) where some of those other communities do get LGA, so we have no support for that; so, currently, our taxpayers are providing those subsidies. I also like to point out if you’re a private ambulance service, if you get taken to a hospital, you can make your money on your ambulance runs. We’re municipally-owned and run an EMS service, so there is no money. When I said the ambulance rolls out the door, it loses money, and that’s because either we provide the Basic Life Support (BLS) or Advanced Life Support (ALS) services; one of the challenges we have, and I’m sure many of you are aware, is that Medicare and Medicaid are currently under a study by the Federal government, so they will not have that rate study and that reimbursement done until 2026. So, we probably won’t see an increase in Medicare and Medicaid until 2027. So, right now, when we do a BLS run, we are capped at $462, and our cost is actually $2,210 to be able to do that; for Advanced Life Support (ALS), we’re capped at $537. So, you can see the difference between $2,200 and our current cap. The other thing, too, is across the metro, you’re seeing an aging population; so, the more Medicare and Medicaid that we bring in, the residents in our population are aging, so it’s definitely causing that to be more challenging. Also, as we continue to add more senior facilities in our community, there’s more Medicare and Medicaid runs. So, this is definitely becoming a challenge for us. City Council Special Meeting January 8, 2025 Page 8 of 15 One of the things that City Council struggles with every year is the amount of write-offs that we have to do. I draw your attention to the bottom of the screen; yes, that’s over $4 million that we will have to write off because we are not recapturing that with private insurance, Medicare, and Medicaid. So, those shortfalls are falling on our residents. Like I said, before 2015, the ambulance service as itself could operate with its own funds to support itself; well, now it’s flipped, now our taxpayers, our residents, it’s in our levy, that are paying for our firefighters and our ambulances. As many of you know, there is a huge issue right now in recruiting firefighter-paramedics. We run a firefighter-paramedic and firefighter-EMT service for our ambulance service. So, recruiting and retaining those personnel are extremely difficult, and so we’ve obviously had to increase those different values for compensation for that. It’s also the cost of our ambulances, as our ambulance costs are continuing to skyrocket. Right now, I think we’re waiting four years for an ambulance; we put our order in four years ago, and we still can’t get it. So, we continue to see the challenge with labor, and we see the challenge with the cost of our ambulance, and now the equipment that we run in our ambulances are state of the art, sophisticated operational equipment to run our ALS service. Those things we’ve actually had to lease, we can’t actually purchase, because it would impact us too much on the capital side of things. I know, Senator Seeburger, you have worked really hard to get funding for this; unfortunately, we were cut off and did not get it as a municipal EMS service. Right now, potentially our taxpayers are subsidizing $350,000 a year; so, our residents are subsidizing Newport, St. Paul Park, and Grey Cloud Township. Now, obviously, our runs between Woodbury, they take some of our patients and we take some of theirs, we’ll call that a wash. So, right now, our ask is, is there any way that we can get $350,000 annually to be able to cover for those other cities? Because, philosophically, we struggle with the fact that our residents are the ones who are subsidizing that for us. And we don’t see this fix really happening until the Feds come up with that new Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement. So, I’ll take any questions you have on that. Representative Johnson said so, I remember this was an issue going back from when I was here on the City Council. I think one of the first conversations that I had was two things: What do you get refunded from the insurance? When they actually have insurance, do you get your actual bill covered, or do the insurance companies cap you out, too? Administrator Levitt replied they cap, but they’re closer to it, so, they’re like at 85%-or-90% revenue. Representative Johnson said so, then, when you actually go out on fires, do you get paid back from homeowner’s insurance for that? So, you basically have the cost that the City is covering for when there’s a fire, right? Administrator Levitt confirmed that. Representative Johnson asked what is the, comparison wise, what is the cost of the Fire services as opposed to EMS? And the reason I ask is because the City takes care of the Fire Department, so the argument would be why isn’t the EMS also covered underneath like Fire coverage? I’m not saying it should be, I’m just asking the question. And then because they also provide Police and Fire, why is EMS singled out as something that is charged out as opposed to if there’s a Fire call or a Police call, why that was ever established. The other thing, too, is then I know you are asking for this money; are the cities that are responsible for this also asking for the money? Because, ultimately, the cities themselves are the ones that are not paying the bills. So, are they also going and saying, hey, we need help because this affects our budget also? Administrator Levitt replied in the proposed legislation, there was $120 million identified; so, all municipalities and governments that run ambulance services are struggling because we transport to the hospital, right? So, if you have Allina, you transport to Allina Hospitals. Allina can make their money back from those hospitals, we can’t, we’re just a transport service. And so that’s the difference why us municipalities are struggling to run EMS services. Mayor Bailey said to maybe answer, Representative, I think we have and we are having conversations with our partnering cities. In the past, because of our service area, and I think you might know this from when you were on the Council, we weren’t allowed or cannot like slice off cities; but what we can do now, with some changes that happened, is we can say okay, City X, if you’re not going to help us with this, we’re going to sub your service out to somebody else, maybe it’s Allina, maybe it’s HealthEast, or whoever. Now what that does, just to be perfectly blunt, is they’re coming then maybe from Eagan for a service that’s in St. Paul Park or Newport or whatever. We City Council Special Meeting January 8, 2025 Page 9 of 15 have some of the best response times, so it does become a challenge and it would be a challenge for them; personally, I would feel bad that we’re not providing the service, but we also, the fact of the matter is our citizens are picking up the cost on this to support these other cities. Normally, we’ve done other things with other cities, which we do with St. Paul Park and Newport, when we as a City, as big as we are, can buy it; you were commenting earlier as more stuff is being made, if we’re doing salt or sealant or whatever for the roads, we buy it and then we buy it also for St. Paul Park and Newport, and then they pay us for whatever that new rate is, if you will. So, I mention that to you because there is an option out there that we could just say, St. Paul Park, Newport, or whatever, we’re not going to service your community anymore because you’re not covering those costs. We’ve had a conversation so far with Newport, it went fairly well; we started the discussion, if you will, we have not yet had our conversation with St. Paul Park. Newport sounded pretty positive in the sense that they’re willing to do something with us because they understand, and I mean, we’re showing them the numbers, we have nothing to hide. The numbers are the numbers, we can show exactly what each city is negative for us that’s causing our citizens to pay. Obviously, if the general public, in my opinion, were to understand that they’re subsidizing these other cities, I think there’s going to be a major citizen uproar, like why are we doing that? So, what we’re trying to do behind the scenes is get the issue resolved. I know at the State level you guys are trying to do it, too, because this is an issue, it’s not just a Cottage Grove issue. We’re just trying to figure out the best way to continue to operate our service here in Cottage Grove and not hand it off to somebody else that we don’t necessarily believe would have the best service for our citizens for life-saving care. Council Member Thiede said well, there would probably be a greater delay in getting to the patient. Mayor Bailey said absolutely, yes. Council Member Olsen said well, Senator Klein deals with this with South Metro, I mean, you know how that whole situation works, and those sorts of configurations exist all across the metro and the State. That funding that you were able to push through, Senator Seeburger, I mean it was a godsend for those departments that received it. I mean, they were on life support, thinking they needed that or they were going to go away. Our fear is that if this continues to become an even greater burden over time, we’re going to have to make some very tough decisions that could potentially impact response times and frankly, survival rates of residents who currently are served by our ambulance service. Representative Dippel asked what specifically did Newport say? Yes, we’ll give you the? Mayor Bailey replied well, not necessarily; they’re looking at it because what they want to do is they want to now, we just met with the mayor and the administrator, and they’ve asked us to come back to a workshop with their entire Council to share the data and the information and what are the “ramifications.” Representative Dippel asked do they have any extra cash right now to? Administrator Levitt replied their budget is already set. Mayor Bailey said yeah, the budgets are set. Council Member Olsen said what’s encouraging, though, is they’re at least willing to have the conversation because that has not always been the case. Senator Seeburger said and very few cities and townships are willing to have that conversation, Statewide. So, this is a common problem throughout the State, particularly in greater Minnesota where the geography is bigger, the ambulance services are smaller, and you’re asking teeny-tiny, itty-bitty towns to assume the cost of providing ambulance service for hundreds, if not thousands, of square miles of territory. So, it’s an issue throughout the State. We are looking at it, we are working on it, part of what we did with the EMS bill that passed last session was to start addressing some of those issues and grant some flexibility with regard to the PSAs. There was huge pushback on that; in fact, I had some fallout in my job over it because Allina is so worried about that change, but it was something that needed to happen. Council Member Olsen said I was going to say it needed to happen. Senator Seeburger said one thing we are talking about, Representative Huot and I are talking about, because we can’t do anything with the Medicare rates, we’re making systemic changes with regard to creating an essential services vs. a pay-for-service, a fee-for-service model. I have a vision that that will happen, but that’s going to take a while. One thing we’re looking at and one thing we’re kicking around is reimbursement for no transports, and so I think that would make a tremendous difference. City Council Special Meeting January 8, 2025 Page 10 of 15 Council Member Olsen said that would be huge. Senator Seeburger said I think what people don’t realize is if you don’t transport the patient, you don’t get paid; and a lot of the calls that are for EMS are to, they’re not transport calls. So, you still have to send out your crew, you’re paying for readiness, and you still have to set up your crew and drive your ambulance and visit the patient, pick them up off the floor, put them in their chair, whatever it is; if you don’t transport them, you don’t get paid, that’s free work, it’s volunteer work for the community. So, we’re thinking of can we create some sort of fund, as we’re building out this new system, so that you can get paid for non-transports, and I think that would create quite a bit of relief in the short term. So, tell me what works, that’s what we’re working on, that’s what we’re thinking of. Council Member Olsen said that’s encouraging. Senator Seeburger said yes, and to answer Wayne’s question, why do we treat EMS differently from Police and Fire? It’s because its not an essential service. So, there is no State mechanism for funding it, it was based on a fee- for-service model, which we’re seeing doesn’t work. The idea is, long-range vision is to make EMS an essential service, just like Police and Fire, but then we need a funding stream, a revenue stream, and what would that be, what would it cost, what would be tolerable, right? Because this would be taxed. So, those are the really difficult questions that we have to finagle and finesse in order to fix this system because it needs to be fixed, it doesn’t work the way it is. But we also can’t do it overnight, so incremental changes, fixing what we can; the long-range vision of trying to retool how we provide prehospital care, so it’s a big job. Representative Johnson said thank you for the explanation on why that was excluded. Paid Family Leave Administrator Levitt said the other thing that we think maybe of retooling is regarding this Paid Family Leave. One of the challenges that we have is the City of Cottage Grove as an employer has been providing the Family Leave. Unfortunately, the way the legislation is written, it’s going to cost us anywhere between $105,000 to almost $143,000 annually. So, for us, we look at providing this, this is only the 50% option, this is only the employer part, we’re not including the employees; if we were to include the employees, that amount would double for that. So, we’re paying for 250 employees and only about 4, on average, will use it now, so, this is increasing our costs. What’s difficult is right now our employees can get their paycheck as normal, they can get their insurance as normal; and now this means that in 2026, all of a sudden they have to file, kind of like unemployment, they’ll have to get a check from the State, they’ll have to write a check to the City for their insurance premiums. So, it’s actually going to cost the City as a whole more, and it will cost the employees more. So, in our 2026 budget, this is equivalent to about three police officers, that unfunded mandate for us. So, we’ve been providing better Family Leave than what is being proposed. I know Representative Johnson and I were talking in line at the food tonight, and it’s challenging. We’re hoping that there could be an exemption or a carveout for local units of government because this is very challenging, and it now provides up to 20 weeks of leave under the law, instead of the FMLA of 12; so, for us, to cover that amount of overtime when we run a lean ship as it is, these things can be extremely challenging to us, but the financial implication is really significant. Senator Seeburger said Jennifer, that’s like a percent of your levy; Administrator Levitt stated that’s correct, and that’s only the employer-required portion of 50%; our four union contracts have the other 50% being borne by our employees. So, you would actually double that if you wanted us to pay for it. Senator Seeburger said that’s something that could be collectively bargained on their end. Administrator Levitt said which we just got done with. Senator Seeburger said so, I’m just saying from their argument, they would be able to collectively bargain something else. Administrator Levitt replied my suspicion is that you are going to see a lot of those unions coming to the Capitol to say this is a heavy burden on our employees to be able to pay for this and this is not sustainable; and a lot of us are providing paid benefits that are greater than this, already, and this cost is significant. So, I mean, like I said, it’s costing us some police officers to be able to do this. Representative Johnson said Commissioner, last night we found out that the South Washington School District is planning on a million dollar hit, and that their teachers are collectively bargaining and have already notified them City Council Special Meeting January 8, 2025 Page 11 of 15 that we have no interest in having anything taken out of our paycheck to cover this. So, they are already planning on that, too, so that’s going to be something that’s going to hit the ground with taxes and stuff like that. But the question I have for you (addressing Administrator Levitt) is how did you come up with only, how did you figure that only four people would be using it? Administrator Levitt replied so, typically, we have about four people that take FMLA, so, about four people have taken Family Medical Leave with us. Usually they will take, most of them right now are cops, I think it’s something in the water that we haven’t seen. Senator Seeburger said I was texting while you were talking because another senator and I have had these conversations, and I think there’s room for improvement. Certainly, a significant group of us are willing to see what we can do. Administrator Levitt said we appreciate anything that will work because this will go into effect in 2026, so we would have to start budgeting for that when we start our new budget. Administrator Levitt said so those are our top four big items. Administration There are a few other items we just want to speak about quickly: •Newspaper Notification Requirements for publication: Can we use electronic media instead of having to have a local paper? •State Licensure of Massage Therapists: As a City, we license them and do a lot of detailed backgrounding, and I will tell you in that, we find a lot that are really in the sex trafficking world. So, we feel that this is a huge issue that really needs to get the attention at the State level for a larger licensure system because it’s definitely a challenge and a problem. Representative Johnson asked so, you want what’s happening in Cottage Grove to be expanded throughout the State? Administrator Levitt replied a State licensure for Massage Therapists, no different than a chiropractor or whatever. Administrator Levitt said I’m going to turn it over to our Parks and Rec Director, Zac Dockter, to talk about a few quick items. Parks and Recreation Director Dockter said for Parks and Recreation, I have two projects that I want to highlight, that I would like to keep attention on: 1) Highway 61: Highway 61 is obviously a historical highway, lots of tourism, and lots going on in Cottage Grove. It obviously runs into St. Paul with the bluffs and many things, all the way down to La Crescent, so we want to have recreational opportunities along Highway 61. We have a great opportunity for a recreational connection from Ravine Regional Park, the County Regional Park, down to the Washington County Point Douglas Regional Park, which is on the banks of the Mississippi and St. Croix Rivers. So, this would be actively engaging both County and State staff to look for a regional trail opportunity here; so far, I’ve had positive response from both County, City, and the State. Ultimately, I want folks to know also that this connects from Lake Elmo Regional Park all the way through Cottage Grove, along County Road 19, and then down Highway 61. So, one picture is all the way from the conjunction of the St. Croix and Mississippi River all the way up to St. Paul, so there’s quite an opportunity there. Council Member Olsen asked Director Dockter who are you working with at the County on that? Director Dockter replied Alex McKinney, and then from the State, MnDOT, and they’ve talked about regional designations, and we’ve made a little bit of headway. 2) Mississippi Dunes Park: Director Dockter said Cottage Grove has been aggressively pursuing 3M Priority 2 Settlement dollars for Mississippi Dunes Park. The goal of the Priority 2 Settlement dollars is to restore and enhance aquatic resources, wildlife habitat, fishing, and outdoor recreation opportunities to the East Metro and City Council Special Meeting January 8, 2025 Page 12 of 15 then downstream of the Mississippi River and the St. Croix River. I think this Park Plan that we’ve proposed along the Mississippi River, at the former Mississippi Dunes Golf Course, which we already have ownership of, is a perfect opportunity to add recreation and enhance and protect natural resources down there as well. I can’t think of a better fit for those dollars. So, when we come up, when we pursue that, we’re just looking for support. Representative Dippel said that’s a brand-new question because I happen to live really close to that, I recognize the trees hanging over the water; when you take a boat and go south, towards Hastings, there’s area that’s, this is actually really easy, you can get through there with just about any boat if you have a boat launch there. But then when you get just a little bit past River Acres, there is this area where it’s about a foot deep, or a foot and a half, and nothing can get through there except a pontoon boat that’s trimmed way up. Have you guys talked to the Army Corps at all about dredging or making sure that boats can get through there? Director Dockter replied, yes, Representative Dippel, that’s a good question. So, we’ve done a little bit of hydrology reporting to find the depth and things like that, but I’ll be honest with you, I’ve not gotten past River Acres. I guess I had some questions about that. Representative Dippel said that’s the one spot right here where it’s shallow. Director Dockter said I thought it got deeper, and Representative Dippel replied no, it doesn’t. It’s weird because in between the buoys, it’s deep because they’re always dredging, but then there’s this weird embankment where the rock island is. Director Dockter said yep, I know exactly where that is. Representative Dippel said yeah, right there, and I haven’t been able to find a spot that’s easy to get through there. So, if you have a regular V-hull, just a cruiser or something, you’d draft too much and you’d get hung up on that. Director Dockter said and I will say that we always intended to engage with the Army Corps of Engineers because they’re doing lots of dredging on Pool 2, building that recreational island. Representative Dipple said you just ask them, because right over here, as you’re coming by. Director Dockter said you’re right, because there is that nice channel through here, and again, it’s going to be a launch, and whether its used for pontoons or duck hunting or small boats or whatever it is, but we also want to focus on the paddling opportunity, too. It’s an unbelievable place to have here. Director Dockter asked if there were any questions on those two projects; none were asked. He said I’ll turn it over to Community Development Director Emily Schmitz. Community Development Director Schmitz said so, it’s no surprise that Cottage Grove clearly has grown the last handful of years. We took an opportunity this year to complete a Housing and Market Study for the entirety of the community. As Ryan has indicated, we’re seeing the growth on the south side of 100th, and we’re starting to talk about the east side of Keats Avenue. So, what that Market Study is telling us is that our market area can support a variety of housing opportunities. It’s also telling us that our population is growing more in the 65-to-75-year-old range, we talked about that, so, how are we planning now and into the future to support the growth of that population, as well as having affordable opportunities in the market? We continue to obviously ask for support into those funding opportunities. Here at Cottage Grove we don’t always receive the best affordable housing opportunities, so we certainly are taking advantage of Valhalla dollars that were approved a couple years ago; receiving that small amount and using that so we can provide support to those projects that we know are needed in our community. Finally, making sure that we think about keeping the zoning a local decision. Each community is unique and different, we all have different needs. It’s no surprise that the housing challenge is real, and it’s everywhere across the State, but I think it’s important to remember that each community evaluates their community and zones it and we make sure that we are provided those opportunities to guide it as well. Unless there are any questions, I’m moving quickly because of the time. Senator Seeburger said I just want to let you know I will never vote for the Missing Middle Bill. Mayor Bailey said thank you. Senator Seeburger said It’s going to be introduced again, it’s the same author. I’m a hard no; Senator Klein said I’ll join you on that. Council Member Olsen and Mayor Bailey both said thank you, and Senator Seeburger said so, you’ve got two nos right here on that Bill. City Council Special Meeting January 8, 2025 Page 13 of 15 Mayor Bailey said what Minneapolis wants does not resonate into the local suburbs, so it does not need to happen. We’re doing it on our own. Council Member Olsen said it sounds like you’re going to be back; Senator Seeburger replied yes. Director Schmitz said I’ll turn it over to Economic Development Director Gretchen Larson. Economic Development Director Larson said I’ll be brief because I know we need to move along. Tax Increment Financing Flexibility: With our economic development, we like to encourage the flexibility of using Tax Increment Financing, or TIF, to do other community projects, such as transit-oriented development. As the mayor said, the more tools in the toolkit the better, when it comes to economic development. Business Expansion: We’d like your continued support of MIF and JCF, which is the Minnesota Investment Fund and the Job Creation Fund. We’ve used that over the past 10 years to create thousands of jobs and a large capital investment in between; so, it’s good for the cities and it’s good for the region. Workforce Readiness: As you all know, a trained workforce is critically important to the State’s economy, and so we’d like to see any type of investment that would remove barriers to education, would help address racial and applicational disparities, and continue the City’s authority to acquire anyone asking for assistance to have workforce requirements in their ask. Childcare Programs: Last, but not least, investment in affordable childcare. Right now, the expense of putting a child through regular daycare is about $16,000 a year in 2024; so, that’s the fourth highest in the nation. The national average says that a family should pay about 7% of their income in childcare, and that’s about 20% in Minnesota. So, anything that you and the other experts in childcare could do to help us with that would be terrific. Representative Johnson said with the child fund, the previous thing, I talked to a daycare provider today, and she is very concerned with her centers and what’s going to happen with those paid medical families. And it will have an opportunity to shut down centers that, which we all know there’s a healthcare, there’s a childcare crisis. But they have to have a certain amount of people per kid, and I think she was at Primrose, and she was very concerned that all of a sudden with the new State mandate that they’re not going to be able to keep up with enough staff as a result of this. So, that’s another issue, and the reason I’m bringing it up is because of here, which is going to increase the cost of childcare and not having people. Senator Klein said I’ve also spoken with multiple childcare providers, and many of them have said that they may just exit the profession entirely because the laws that were just passed have made it too difficult for them to comply, and a lot of them are just moms who are trying to make ends meet and take care of kids. Director Larson said yes, the City Administrator and I have been talking about that as well, it varies. And with that, I’ll turn it over to Brenda, our Finance Director. Council Member Olsen asked before you do, I have a quick question on one of your bullet points. It talks about an educated workforce and trying to remove barriers for folks. I’m curious if the two senators might be able to enlighten me: Has there been any conversation at all about the proliferation of special needs people, who are now moving into the workforce, and ways in which we can support them being able to hold a job and get to and from work, and be part of sort of a “traditional workforce” or work environment? It seems like the opportunities that even were there when I was young for special needs folks to work, whether it was in a restaurant environment or something like that, those seem to be few and far between. And some of it has to do, frankly, with insurance costs and exposure and all kinds of things. Do you guys talk about that at all? I’m just curious if that’s come up. Senator Klein replied neither of us serve on Human Services. Senator Seeburger replied yeah, that’s more of a Senator Hoffman issue, but I can tell you I personally had those conversations with Senator Hoffman because I do have a special needs son. Council Member Olsen said as do I, which is why I’m asking. Senator Seeburger said, so, it’s on my radar. I know from personal experience that there are various private entities and programs that assist with young adult transition, but I also know that the waiver process is complicated and it takes a really long time. Council Member Olsen said extremely. City Council Special Meeting January 8, 2025 Page 14 of 15 Senator Seeburger said and I think there are also some issues with guardianship that I think we can work on fixing as well, but I’d be interested in talking more about that and figuring out ways that we can support. Council Member Olsen said I hear because of the circle that we run in, we have lots of friends and neighbors that we know, who have special needs family members; I hear a lot of frustration around, you know, I’m having a really hard time finding a job for so and so or such and such, or finding a job coach, or any of those things. Senator Seeburger said let’s talk more about that; give me a call. Council Member Olsen said yes, that would be good. Finance Brenda Malinowski, Finance Director, spoke on the following topics: Office of the State Auditor (OSA) Levy Limits: Director Malinowski said I’m going to start with talking about levy limits, the yes and no levy limits. Emily said it very well, when we have levy limits, each community is different in how they make use of their State-imposed levy limits. We’re just not all the same, some of us are developing and some of us are fully developed, so we ask for consideration on that, to continue the levy limits. Regarding the State Auditors, in our reporting process, we are mandated on doing some reporting, also to our community, and we appreciate that and we do that. But in our budget, we are able to put in our City newsletter, and that gets to all of our community, but when we publish our year-end Financial Report, we have to do that in our official newspaper; last year, we paid about $900 to do that, and so we’re asking that we could have that same consideration for some of those publications where we could do it in our newsletter, as we mail that out to our community and its on our City website. Sales Tax on Local Government Purchases: On sales tax on local government purchases, we’re exempt from a lot of things, and one thing that we are not exempt from sales tax right now is motor vehicle sales tax. We are for our Police and Fire vehicles, we aren’t for the rest of our equipment, and so we’re asking for an exemption on that. Our equipment has gotten very expensive recently, we have a one-axle plow truck that we’re ordering this year, and it’s $315,000; if we had an exemption, it would be another $22,000 that we could concentrate on other equipment or lowering taxes in the City. And then a simplified process for exemption of sales tax on construction materials, in support of our construction projects; right now, we would have to bid each of those parts out separately on our big construction projects, and in so many cities, including Cottage Grove, that’s a lot of work behind the scene to make that happen. So, we do not go for that exemption, and even if there could be a refund at the end of a project for that sales tax that was included in that construction, that would help our local residents in order to keep our taxes down. Lastly, regarding TIF and when our Districts are decertified, we have some consideration that if there’s going to be an audit of the TIF District after decertification, that it would occur within one year. Right now, there is not a limit on that, and so, in theory, it could be 5-to-10 years down the road when an audit process would start, and then we probably would have staff turnover. It’s going to take a lot of staff time and dollars to go back and understand what happened in that decertified District several years ago. Representative Johnson said, real quick, back to the simplified process of exempting sales tax, you said it’s an issue when you’re bidding? But don’t they pay sales tax on where it’s delivered? So, if it comes to Cottage Grove, there’d be one rate, wouldn’t it? Director Malinowski replied correct, but if we go down to Menards right now, and the City makes a purchase, we’re exempt from sales tax. If we make it part of a bid package, we have to have each contractor have an Exemption Certificate that they pay to all their vendors that they use and include all of the costs. It’s a long process, and so a lot of cities do not do that; we just have the one State package. Representative Johnson said okay, thank you. Director Malinowski said and I’ll turn it over to Pete. Public Safety Pete Koerner, Public Safety Director, said I’ll keep this really quick. In this pamphlet we gave you, I have about 12- or-13 of our priorities in Public Safety. I can tell you at the Capitol, locally, too, that Public Safety does feel the love, you guys have been wonderful to us. So, without reading all of this, I just kind of want to mention: City Council Special Meeting January 8, 2025 Page 15 of 15 Officer Wellness: You’ve done a lot with Officer Wellness, and it’s kind of expanding out to the Fire Services, too. A lot of the Fire and Police officers, they get damaged in their careers, but that doesn’t mean the career needs to be over. So, if you’d continue to support those efforts, we really appreciate that because there are treatments, and we were seeing a lot of our staff leave, but we want to keep them; they’re still really good employees. Recruitment and Retention Needs: This is a huge issue with Public Safety, Police, Fire, and EMS; we’re still doing okay with it here, but I know there are a lot of programs out there. So, when you hear these, please continue to support those. Copper Wire Theft Prevention: I know that just went into effect last week, but it’s like the catalytic converter stuff, that law worked. We saw a significant reduction, and I know some of these trade groups out there are now suing the Department of Commerce, so continue to support this. We had some significant losses here in Cottage Grove with the copper wire, and our officers actually caught people, so that was good. With that, I’m always open if there are any Public Safety things, and I know over the years, you have contacted us, we have a good relationship. We work a lot with our Sheriffs Association, Chiefs Association, and State Fire Marshals. So, the things you’ve seen here that we’re supporting is pretty much metro and Statewide. Mayor Bailey said again, thank you all for coming. There were some other bullet points, but of course we’re getting to the time where we’re going to have to go in and do a Council Meeting. As you look through anything in the information we’re providing for you, if something rings a bell or you want some further clarification, you just heard from Pete, all of our staff is open and willing to have conversations with you, or myself to go testify or whatever you need from an information standpoint. We would appreciate it and your support, and I know you get to have some fun up at the Capitol this year, but understand, as you all know, that everything we do, everything you do is for the betterment of the community and the State. So, all of our residents that you represent, we represent; think about them when things get hot up there with which direction you want to go, and understand that some of these that we’ve talked about have tails, depending on funding sources and things like that. We just would hope for any support that you give us, specifically on our legislative priorities, but if there are any other items you need from us, let us know. Administrator Levitt stated our only other request is for a group picture if we get that done. Representative Johnson said mayor, I’d like to just thank you for having a lobbyist that’s down there, working on your behalf; it makes it easier if we’re not the first person to come out and talk to people about it. It was very awesome and forward thinking to do that. Mayor Bailey said well, I agree, and it’s helped. A group photo was taken of all present. 4. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 6:14 p.m. Minutes prepared by Judy Graf and reviewed by Tamara Anderson, City Clerk. 1 City Council Action Request 7.B. Meeting Date 2/5/2025 Department Administration Agenda Category Action Item Title City Council Regular Meeting (01/22/2025) Staff Recommendation Approve the January 22, 2025, Regular Meeting Minutes. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. 2025-01-22 City Council Meeting 2. 2025-01-22 City Council Meeting CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE  12800 Ravine Parkway  Cottage Grove, Minnesota 55016 www.cottagegrovemn.gov  651-458-2800  Fax 651-458-2897  Equal Opportunity Employer COTTAGE GROVE CITY COUNCIL January 22, 2025 12800 RAVINE PARKWAY SOUTH COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 COUNCIL CHAMBER - 7:00 P.M 1. CALL TO ORDER The City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, Washington County, Minnesota, held a regular meeting on January 22, 2025, at Cottage Grove City Hall, 12800 Ravine Parkway. Mayor Bailey called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The audience, staff, and City Council Members stood and recited the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. ROLL CALL City Clerk Tammy Anderson called the roll: Mayor Bailey-Here; Council Member Clausen-Here; Council Member Garza-Here; Council Member Olsen-Here; Council Member Thiede-Here. Also present: Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator; Tammy Anderson, City Clerk; Ryan Burfeind, Public Works Director; Zac Dockter, Parks and Recreation Director; Pete Koerner, Public Safety Director; Korine Land, City Attorney-LeVander, Gillen & Miller, PA; Brenda Malinowski, Finance Director; Emily Schmitz, Community Development Director; Gary Orloff, Streets Superintendent; Phil Jent, Communication Manager; Brad Peterson, Public Safety Captain. 4. OPEN FORUM Mayor Bailey opened the Open Forum. As no one wished to address the Council, Mayor Bailey closed the Open Forum. 5. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Motion by Council Member Thiede to approve the agenda; second by Council Member Clausen. Motion carried: 5-0. 6. PRESENTATIONS A. 2024 Annual Photo Contest Winners Staff Recommendation: Receive presentation on Capture Cottage Grove winners. Mayor Bailey said Phil Jents, our Communications Manager, is going to walk us through this; Mayor Bailey asked the Council Members to join him in front of the dais as the winners will eventually be invited up to take a picture with all of us. City Council Meeting January 22, 2025 Page 2 of 20 Communications Manager, Phil Jents, introduced himself, said he’s very happy, honored, and excited to be here tonight to talk about the 2024 Cottage Grove Annual Photo Contest. I told the folks I got to meet just a second ago that it’s one of those things that while communicating for the City is always fun and exciting, this is one of those things were our folks get to have a little extra fun seeing all the great photos that our residents send in, including the ones that we’re going to see here tonight. Manager Jents said as we all know, Cottage Grove is a beautiful place to live, and many of our residents are talented and creative, such as the ones here tonight who sent in photos; this is why we do the photo contest every year to capture some of that talent and creativity and the beauty that’s in our community. The Capture Cottage Grove contest has been an annual tradition I believe for about ten years or so, and we wrapped up 2024 with our photo contest that started on November and ran until December 9. All photos were considered for judging and were required to be from within the City of Cottage Grove itself and taken in the year 2024. We had categories for the photos: Life in Cottage Grove, Business in Cottage Grove, Cottage Grove Parks & Landmarks, and Faces of Cottage Grove. I’ll move through our excellent winners here. Life in Cottage Grove: Submitted by Angie Schaffer, with a photo titled “Morning Run.” This photo kind of explains itself, obviously, it’s a morning sunrise; I don't know exactly where that location is but I’m a little envious of the view there, and this was one of our excellent winners. Business in Cottage Grove: While that may not exactly look like a business, this photo submitted by Sabrina Thuringer, is titled “Easter Egg Hunt” at the Cottage Grove Ice Arena, with the model right here in the room with us; we’re very honored to have Grayson joining us. Again, it’s a photo that needs no explanation, it is just very adorable. Cottage Grove Parks & Landmarks: Submitted by Joseph Pavel, is titled “Smoke on the Water.” This was taken at Ravine Park, next door here. Joe said when I met him just a second ago that it’s kind of a rare occurrence to see the fog happening over the pond there, but he was there at the right time and right place and got a good photo, so thanks for that. Faces of Cottage Grove: Submitted by Ashley Thompson, and this must be Grizz, as the photo is titled “Grizz,” and that one needs no explanation; it’s just a very adorable photo of the dog. Manager Jents stated that’s really all I’ve got, other than in total we had a really good number of submissions, about 50 or so. It’s always really fun combing through those photos, and it’s hard to pick a favorite, but staff votes very diligently, reviewing all those photos. We’re very happy and honored to have you all here and for submitting those photos. He said mayor, I’ll turn it back to you. Mayor Bailey said fantastic. Before we have all of you come up to present you with a certificate and some money, I just want to thank all of you, obviously, for participating in this contest. We get to use these photos, as you know, I think you might have been already getting them to sign off on it, in our marketing materials to show a little bit more about Cottage Grove. When you look at our publications, our Visitors Bureau, all the different things that we have, we always like to incorporate some of the photos that our citizens are submitting over the years on some of our City publications. So, you will see some of these photos out there, which is part of the reason why staff has asked for permission to be able to utilize those photos. He asked all of the winners to come up, in front of the dais, where we will present you with the plaques and some money. Each of the Council Members took a photo, and the winning photographers each stood with their photo and a Council Member. After the winners were given their plaques and checks, a photograph was taken of all of the winners with Mayor Bailey and the City Council Members, and the winners were all congratulated. Mayor Bailey thanked Manager Jents for facilitating that presentation. 7. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve the November 20, 2024, City Council Regular Meeting Minutes. B. Approve the December 4, 2024, City Council Regular Meeting Minutes. C. Approve the December 18, 2024, City Council Regular Meeting Minutes. City Council Meeting January 22, 2025 Page 3 of 20 D. Approve the January 8, 2025, City Council Regular Meeting Minutes. E. Authorize issuance of a single-occasion gambling permit to David Gene Martin, on behalf of the Accacia Lodge No. 51, to conduct a raffle at 11094 70th Street South on October 4, 2025. F. Authorize issuance of a massage business license and massage therapist license to Savannah Marie Koenig at the location of Salons by JC (7240 East Point Douglas Road South, Suite 160, #36). G. Approve the agreement with Judith Graf for transcription services for 2025. H. Appoint the issuance of rental licenses to the properties listed in the attached table. I. Appoint Tony Khambata to fill the vacant seat on the Convention and Visitors Bureau Board of Directors to a three-year term ending on 12-31-2028. J. Approve and execute the non-criminal justice agency Joint Powers Agreement (NCJA JPA) with the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension. K. Accept the Pay Equity Report to be submitted to the State of Minnesota. L. Adopt Resolution 2025-09, authorizing the abatement of utility billing certification in the amount of $4,049.09. M. Adopt Ordinance 1092, amending the City Fee Table. N. Approve the increased budget amount of the Parks trailer from $22,000 to $23,898.88. O. Approve the Polco Confluence Inc. software subscription and support agreement in the amount of $29,300. P. Staff recommends the approval for the purchase of FlowMSP SaaS in the amount of $2,000 annually. Q. Staff recommends the approval of the KnowBe4 Security Awareness solution in the amount of $11,298. R. Approve the 3M Draft NPDES Permit Comments. S. Adopt Resolution 2025-010 authorizing final payment of $13,868.95 to Diverse Construction Services, LLC for the HERO Center Range Re-Roof project. T. Approve the Memorandum of Understanding with Washington County for the County 19A & 100th Street Project related to final design, environmental documentation, and municipal consent. Council Member Thiede wished to pull Item Q, KnowBe4 Security Awareness Add-on, on the Consent Agenda for further comment and/or discussion. Council Member Thiede stated as I was going through this, there is a new cost of a little over $11,000 a year, but I talked to Brian, our IT Manager, and we’re making some changes. It said in the description that we’re replacing something and so we’re actually replacing another product that we had, which was actually costing us close to $93,000 a year; so, it’s a good savings so our IT Department is doing a great job of looking at ways to save money for all of our residents and keep things more secure. I just wanted to let everybody know that, just in case you were wondering, as I was, when you were looking through that. Motion by Council Member Olsen to approve the Consent Agenda; second by Council Member Garza. Motion carried: 5-0. 8. APPROVE DISBURSEMENTS A. Approve disbursements for the period of 1-03-2025 through 1-16-2025 in the amount of $3,870,248.78. Motion by Council Member Garza to approve disbursements; second by Council Member Thiede. Motion carried: 5-0. 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS - None. 10. BID AWARDS - None. City Council Meeting January 22, 2025 Page 4 of 20 11. REGULAR AGENDA - None. 12. COUNCIL COMMENTS AND REQUESTS Council Member Garza said I really don’t have much to say today, but it looks like we have a few events happening, coming up pretty quick: Strawberry Fest is having their first Bingo, we have our tickets, and I’m excited for that, it’s on February 22 at 11:00 a.m., up at River Oaks. Other than that, you guys have a beautiful rest of the month, it’s going to end pretty quick. Council Member Thiede said well, she just took what I was going to talk about; Council Member Garza said I’m sorry, Council Member Thiede replied that’s okay. I just want to say that hopefully everybody’s been safe during our cold weather; I have to go get a new battery for the van as it kind of pooped out here in the cold weather. It’s just kind of shocking, I talked to my brother down in Kansas City, and he shows me pictures that they’ve gotten like over a foot of snow in the back yard; I told him I was jealous, as we hardly have anything. So, it’s kind of been a weird winter, then all this snow down south and so forth, I feel sorry for those people because they don’t have the means to really clean it off effectively. Other than that, be safe while it’s cold out. Council Member Olsen said my in-laws live in Gulf Shores, Alabama, and they are from Minnesota, so they know how to deal with snow. They sent me pictures today and there are six inches of snow on the beach in Gulf Shores, Alabama, and I don’t feel sorry for them a bit. So, there you go, how’s that? Council Member Olsen said I just wanted to make sure that the public was aware that this coming Saturday, January 25, is Hockey Day in Minnesota. Of course, every year when there’s Hockey Day in Minnesota, there are all kinds of events across the State; this event that I want to mention happens to be Hockey Fights Cancer, which is Minnesota Hockey Day’s kind of theme this year. We will be having events at the Cottage Grove Ice Arena on Saturday, all day. There will be lots of different things going on, but if you want to catch a really good game or two, the girls’ JV will be playing at 11:15, and the boys’ JV will be playing at 1:15, and then we will have the girls’ varsity playing at 1:15, and the boys’ varsity playing at 3:15. So, if you’re looking for a way to celebrate Hockey Day in Minnesota, watch a good game and maybe contribute to the theme of hockey fighting cancer, I’m sure you would be very welcome to attend any one of those games at the Cottage Grove Ice Arena this coming Saturday, January 25. You can also donate online if you’re unable to attend the event; I know there are a lot of people out of town for what they thought would be nice weather down in Florida and things like that. So, if you’re unable to come, you can also make that donation online; if you go to the Park High girls or boys hockey website, the donation link is on there. I’d read it to you, but it’s really long, so just go and look for it on the website and you can make a donation. Council Member Clausen stated being in the public eye, we generally hear a lot of comments from the public when things go well or don’t go so well, or they seek us out with their opinion. It was very nice to hear today, I was having a cup of coffee and a gentleman approached our group and wanted to say thank you to the Fire Department; there was a fire in town last weekend that required a mutual aid response from our partners in Hastings, Woodbury, St. Paul Park, and Newport, and if I missed somebody, I forgot. I don’t have permission to speak on behalf of that person, but he thanked our department for all of the help, and I just want to make sure that it flows down to our staff to know that we got a lot of good comments, and I want to make sure that they know about it. Council Member Olsen said that’s fantastic. Mayor Bailey said that is very good to see. Council Member Olsen said that happens a lot; believe it or not, we hear that from the public all the time, and it’s really gratifying. Mayor Bailey said I don’t really have anything for myself this evening since everything’s kind of been covered up here. I’m just going to let the public know that we do have three workshops that Council is going to be working with staff on this evening, after the meeting here: City Council Meeting January 22, 2025 Page 5 of 20 The first item is the Future Park Projects that were part of the LOST referendum that just recently happened last November. We’ll just be giving direction to our staff on where we want to go with it, putting them in the CIPs, and so on. The second item is New Development Boulevard Tree Requirements; we’re looking at a couple things, as we all know, some of our lots are getting smaller, that’s part of what it is these days, and different ways of making sure that if we do plant trees they’re actually going to be able to survive. Thirdly, Modifications to the Issuing of Temporary Certificates of Occupancy (TCO) from our Building Department; there are some things that they want to walk through with us for the future to make sure that housing that comes to Cottage Grove are able to get their TCOs at a stable and quicker pace, I guess is maybe the best way to put it. We do not have a Workshop, Closed to the Public, this evening, so we won’t be adjourning in here, we will be adjourning in the Training Room. Otherwise, everybody have a great Hockey Day, as we talked about, this weekend, and try to stay warm. Take care. 13. WORKSHOPS - OPEN TO PUBLIC - TRAINING ROOM A. Future Park Projects (LOST) Staff Recommendation: Receive information and provide direction on future park projects. Mayor Bailey said this is from the LOST referendum that did not pass, so Director Zac Dockter is going to walk us through this, talk about the different projects, and kind of what we can look at for the future. Director Dockter stated when we started the referendum process, there were projects that were in the CIP before we even developed the Preserve.Play.Prosper plan. So, the Council had said what are the referendum goals, and if it doesn’t go, there are still some things we want to talk about, to see whether there’s a priority component or not, and that’s what tonight’s workshop is intended to do. So, I’m hoping to do less speaking and more listening so I can understand what the Council wants to do with this list of projects. As I go through the slides, I’ll go through it very quickly. There were three handouts that just kind of showed the three projects, with the last Concept Designs, but in front of you is this sheet here that has a list of all the projects, the micro projects and then the higher-level projects. There is also the current Capital Improvements Plan (CIP), so at the end of this maybe you’ll want to say you want to push something up and we’ll talk about the need of whatever it might be. So, these will be your tools to use as we get to the end of the presentation. So, a real quick summary: Hamlet Park is a $17M project, Mississippi Dunes Park is a $13M project, and River Oaks is a $6M project; those were the referendum items. Within each of those, there was a list of micro projects that made up those larger park projects. Hamlet Park •Finishing the softball fields and the two baseball fields and the final parking lot down there. •The park building is $4M, replacing the current athletic football-soccer field, multiuse field; the athletic field is $2M along with the laying. •Replacing the skateboard park into a concrete plaza is $1M. •Splashpad is about $1M. •Enhancing the playground and the whole playground and spot around that, similar to but a slightly smaller scale as Woodridge Park, $6M. •Amphitheater and Art Walk Garden is $1M. •The north trail entrance, by the pond, off of Hadley and 80th Street, $500K, and the distance equivalent would be choreographed. It’s important to remember that there are additional costs for things like escalation and soft costs, and engineering costs. So, if we choose these projects, the full prices could change, depending on how we approach. I also want to mention real quickly, and I’ll break this stuff out in another slide, too, but with potential funding support, we’re looking at all those projects, there’s not a lot of outdoor funding right at our fingertips. There is a Minnesota Outdoor Recreation Grant, which gave us $350K that we were successful in doing for the first two City Council Meeting January 22, 2025 Page 6 of 20 ballfields at Hamlet Park, and I’m pretty confident we could do it for the second two ballfields. It could also be used for things like playgrounds or whatever else, but you could only use it for one of those projects; you could use it for one year, and then maybe a couple years down the road you can make a decision on it. But, again, a competitive grant process is not guaranteed money in the budget, but this is $350K, and based on the ballfield development, as you know, that will be 50% of the project cost. Mississippi Dunes Park •Boat, kayak launch, and fishing pier, $1.7M. •Habitat restoration $500K. •Picnic area, $500K. •Trail system is about $250K. •Parking lot with landscaping features, about $1.5M. •Four-season building with a patio area, $5M. •Grand lawn with a terrace and more of a natural patio by the river, $1.5M. •Nature-based playground, $1M. •Outdoor classroom is close to $2M. Essential Funding: We believe that the building and park amenities are going to be a perfect fit for the 3M Priority 2 Settlement Funds, so we’re going to go aggressively for that; I mentioned that at our meeting with the legislators as well. We think we can hopefully get at least 50% of the project on that, so about $6M is vetted, which leaves us $20M to be spread out, but we’re at the heart of that damage. So, I’m hoping that they’ll be very supportive of that type of funding and it meets all of our goals for that project. Habitat Restoration: We’ve been successful in that over and over, so $150K, which would be about 70%-80% of those projects, and those are pretty common. We’re being pretty aggressive with that so far, and we’ve been working with the South Washington County Watershed District as well, so it could be 100% there. Playgrounds, trails, and interpretive areas: The DNR Outdoor Recreation Grant is giving us $50K, about 30% of that funding. Boat launch, kayak, and fishing pier: We think we can get by with about $500K, working with the Minnesota DNR Fisheries. River Oaks Golf Course & Event Center I don’t want to get too far into details because I think we’ll talk more about this when we get to the workshop when we talk about our Annual Planning and the Business Plan. Just real quick, the plans for the micro projects in there were: •Building Enhancements, Simulator, $3M. •Patio Upgrades, $1M. •Driving Green Enhancements, $1M. •Inlay and putting green, $500K. •Winter Zone and Biking Trail, $500K. In terms of funding for it, there’s not a lot out there, at least at my fingertips, but we do have the Minnesota DNR Regional Trail Grant, which I’ve acquired several times in my career. My only concern with that is that the grant requires four-season use; I’m a little bit concerned about how that would work with River Oaks during the golf season, whereas this would be filed for use primarily in the winter. So, we can still go that route, but maybe that $300K was a commitment here, and maybe we will get a different spot for that than down at River Oaks; that was the conversation that we’d had at that time. Director Dockter asked if there were any questions on the alternative funding sources; otherwise, I’m probably not going to go back to that. Mayor Bailey asked if Council had any questions on that: Council Member Thiede asked if Director Dockter was ready for general questions. Director Dockter replied just on the alternative funding sources, and then I’ll go onto the others. Director Dockter said I provided a list of the micro projects in front of you, and I also provided the CIP, which is up here on the screen, and I’ll leave that slide up. My question to the Council is which projects do you still want to City Council Meeting January 22, 2025 Page 7 of 20 pursue to keep in the CIP; you can decide on where they want to go in the CIP or maybe we still want to do the project, but it’s not even in the CIP, maybe it’s longer than seven years out or whatever it is. I wanted to give you an option of moving these projects if you feel like it. I do want to say that some of these 2025 projects are already in the queue, and we’ve done service agreements on them, too, but for the most part, several of these can be moved. Everything in 2026 and 2027 can be adjusted. With that, I will take questions. Mayor Bailey said I’ll start with Council Member Thiede and then I’ll move across the room. Council Member Thiede said in my opinion, like up here and so forth, Mississippi Dunes is kind of a no brainer. That’ll make that essentially functional and get people to the water and everything, and we’re pretty well covered by a grant if we get the grant. Just a question, what did the first two ballparks at Hamlet cost? Director Dockter replied they were I want to say $3.5M, and then the building was $600K. Council Member Thiede said and these two are $6M because? Director Dockter replied well, one is escalation, and then escalation from when we built those fields to now; but then it’s also we get, remember when we did these estimates, we were building an escalation for those projects, too, so we were anticipating 2026, 2027 construction, as well as the soft costs are in there, too. Council Member Thiede said so now the ballfields, though, the thing is there’s the concept of yeah, you want amenities for the public, but certain things will generate revenue, right? Director Dockter replied correct. Council Member Thiede asked so, you know, probably the ballfields, those would generate revenue? Director Dockter replied some revenue. Council Member Thiede asked or not necessarily? Director Dockter replied it’ll never even pay for itself, but it’ll generate some revenue from that. Council Member Thiede said okay. Director Dockter said but there’s this process that I’m comfortable that those numbers are probably conservative today, and we all know how they can change quickly, right? So, every year it seems to change quickly, and we won’t be constructing any of this stuff until 2025, 2026. I’m comfortable with the numbers today. Council Member Olsen asked Director Dockter on his CIP document here, I’m assuming that the color coding coincides with the funding sources, is that right? Director Dockter replied correct, yes. Council Member Olsen said so, something that I’m curious about is, and I’m sure you won’t have the answer to that this evening, if you were to look at all of these items and prioritize them, how would you do that? What would you and your team perceive to be the highest priority items? Because obviously with the fact that the Local Option Sales Tax referendum did not pass, we’re in a pretty tough spot, and a number of these things are simply not feasible, they just aren’t. So, I think there are several ways to sort it; one way is well, okay, if we’ve got funding for it, we can move forward. You mentioned that we’ve already signed some agreements on different projects and things, but as you look at the whole picture and you have to put your eggs in various baskets, I’d be curious what baskets you would put them in; for example, if you feel like Hamlet Park is a greater priority than River Oaks, or is Mississippi Dunes a greater priority than Hamlet? Because that’s what we’re going to have to do; the bottom line is we’re going to have to pick and choose and you’re the expert. You and your people do this for a living every day and I have a lot of faith in your analysis, your opinion, etc. So, if that’s a today conversation, great, I assume it’s not, but as we work through this process, heading into our budget dialogue, it might be something to think about. Director Dockter replied I can give you pieces on some of that stuff that was on the LOST. Council Member Olsen replied, yes, please do, I would love it. Director Dockter said so real quick, on these, I mean, you need to make your moves. As you can see at the top, no bill gets you very far, right? Council Member Olsen replied right. Director Dockter said so, but there are things like sports lighting, you can push it farther away. I mean, they’re aging systems, and many have to be replaced, but they can certainly be pushed out. Here’s my, like the hockey rink boards, but again, I think all of these in pink are Park Improvement Funds; they’re typically pretty important upgrades that the neighborhoods have asked for, the community has asked for that we needed to split, and they’re relatively low in cost and then or they’re things that just need to be replaced because they’re aging out. But there’s not a ton of movement in there, but certainly, and even the Park Trust Fund, that gets difficult, right? So, if you’re putting up a new park in a neighborhood that’s probably developed, that’s been waiting for a park, we try to build one of these. So, I’ll just say that, but again, City Council Meeting January 22, 2025 Page 8 of 20 everything can be moved; basically, everything can be re-prioritized, so I don’t want to take that away. With River Oaks, I think everything gets put on the final page, everything gets put on the back burner. The Dunes, I think we go aggressively at the 3M Settlement, I think we get the boat launch and the kayak launch, and we can get back that access to the water if we take care of the trails. We can get those things so that people can use the park, right? That’s what we purchased it for, and I think we go aggressively and see how much we can get to do that, and then deal with the rest of the things, whatever the remaining things are, we can deal with that later. Hamlet Park: I would say my number one concern is the skateboard park; it’s just that I think I put that in originally in 2004. Its aged out. Council Member Olsen said yeah, and it definitely has, you can see it. Director Dockter said now the great thing is, the surface needs to be replaced, but actually those boards can be refurbished because basically there’s a frame underneath, and you can spend $100K and you can do quite a bit of work. And I’m learning that concrete skateboard parks are actually starting to not get too trendy now since people are getting bored with them. I think it’s coming back to what we have, to engage the system we have, so we could probably spend $100K or $200K, because $100K is just for the surface; we could probably spend $200K there, and add to it, refurbish it, fix it, replace the surface, and make a great skateboard park that people would love. So, that would be my number one priority. I think the synthetic fields, in my opinion, the Athletic Association has had two opportunities at that, it didn’t work, so, I think we put that to rest. The park building we are going to have to address at some point, but that doesn’t have to be a today conversation, I think I can keep things on there; so, these are all my opinions, remember. Council Member Olsen said right, and that’s what I asked for, though. Director Dockter said the splashpad, I don’t think that’s worth doing because of the cost. Enhanced playground, at some point we’ll have to deal with that playground, I don’t know if that’s a today conversation because its still a great playground that’s there. People aren’t asking for another Woodridge. Council Member Olsen asked when did we replace that equipment last? Director Dockter replied so the original equipment was in 2004 or 2005. Council Member Olsen said yeah, but we upgraded once. Director Dockter said we renovated it in like 2017 or 2018; some of the original, most of it is the original system, then we added to it and/or replaced, because the concrete sidewalk around it has picnic areas. We really added a lot to it, it’s still good today, but some of the equipment is 20 years old. That one probably needs to get in the CIP somewhere. Council Member Thiede asked with the skateboard park, is there any chances for like sponsorship, like it could be somebody so the skateboard park that they have naming rights, right, and have a deal? Council Member Garza said that’s a big business out there. Council Member Olsen said I think the Dave Thiede Skateboard Park sounds good, I think its perfect, I really do. Council Member Thiede replied I do have an opportunity, mabe. Council Member Olsen replied well, but you need a battery on your car, so, let’s not get crazy. Director Dockter said one thing I should mention with the Hamlet Skateboard Park is I think you may recall, probably don’t, but in one workshop, whether this goes or not, we need to replace the surface there, as its all cracking up. So, we already have $100K in the CIP; now, it’s just a matter of whether the Council wants to add to this and fix up the equipment. At least we have a start there that’s budgeted. The softball fields completion I kind of struggle with because its an uncomplete product, it feels like an uncomplete product at the moment. But, again, the Athletic Association had the opportunity to approve the referendum on that one twice, so, I don't know that that’s the highest priority at this moment. Council Member Olsen said well, and I think we wall have to envision that that could really be a destination for larger tournaments and things of that nature, but at the end of the day, if we can’t afford it, which we can’t, it probably needs to wait. But some of the other things that you’re prioritizing I think make a lot of sense, both just in terms of our fiscal ability to get those things done, but also the larger benefit to the community. So, that’s kind of why I asked is because I’m sure you played with the Rubik’s Cube in your brain a million times, and you’re going to have much more of a handle on this than we are. Director Dockter asked what do you guys hear? And you don’t hear people asking for the ballfields, and I understand and I get it. But how do I prioritize two baseball fields over Mississippi Dunes or over the Still Ponds City Council Meeting January 22, 2025 Page 9 of 20 Park, or the new Wolterstorff trail? That gets to be the hard part. So, I think we wait and see if I can close the issue, they probably need to come to us, right, at some point? Then we can have that conversation. Council Member Olsen said so, then what I think I hear you saying is go hard after 3M Settlement money for Mississippi Dunes, get that park moving. We may not be able to fully complete it, but we’ll get the necessary elements in place, right? Invest a little bit into some of the more feasible elements of what we had for Hamlet, and then we just keep our powder dry on River Oaks until we can figure out some different funding for that stuff. Does that sound about right, did I get it right? Director Dockter replied agreed, and the only thing I’ll add is remember, we’re still developing parks all across the community while this is happening; there is more development, 100%. Council Member Olsen said from my chair, which is 20%, it makes sense to me; so, I appreciate your feedback on that. Thank you. Council Member Clausen said I’m coming into this later, and I beg your pardon while I ask these questions, but I don’t know the answers. How does the Athletic Association, and you talked about them and how they need to do something; how do they relate to the softball fields, what is their role? Council Member Olsen said that’s a great question. Director Dockter replied they’ll be the primary user, but they also have, in terms of funding, they have charitable gambling, so they have opportunities to secure funds. They’re willing contributors, and they’ve done a lot for our parks here, all along, there have been millions that they have put into our department. It’s all good, but they’re the primary users, so they’re the ones that we have to work with to make sure that the field is being used; we don’t want them to build a skatepark to be used, right? Especially here. Otherwise, I think they’ve got tens of thousands of fans that are impacted by this, so, we need to hear from them. I think that was part of the frustration with the referendum is we never got the Athletic Association to really get on board with it, and I get it, they’re all volunteers. I don’t expect anything, but when we’re trying to do things like that, and we’re trying to, if the vote doesn’t go through like it did over here, so now we need to hear from them to make that a higher priority. Does that make sense? Council Member Clausen replied thank you. Mayor Bailey asked Council Member Garza if she had anything to add on this one, but she did not. Mayor Bailey told Director Dockter on my take, I do think, the first thing, everything in 2025 stays. I think we’re, it’s pretty vague. The only one, to your point as it relates to the Athletic Association, in my opinion, for 2026 might be the $355K for the lighting; because if there is anything, I think we should go to that organization and have a conversation about because it benefits them more than it benefits us. That would be one that I would have a conversation with them about with the lighting, because that would then free up some opportunities for some of this other stuff that we’re looking at, as we look to 2026. At the same time, and the reason I’m throwing that one out there specifically is because I want you guys to go after the grants and yes, the 3M Settlement money; I mean, it is more than $20M now because its been collecting interest, I don’t exactly know the new number, but I heard it was north of $30M. Director Dockter said good. Mayor Bailey said, so, there’s more money in there than I think we’re, I just don’t want you to cut us short, right? Director Dockter replied, well, I’m going for the whole thing. Mayor Bailey said I think you should. Director Dockter said we are going for the whole thing. Mayor Bailey said and I think we should, and then if we have to supplement with going after other DNR grants or things like that, that’s great. And if the DNR is able to provide us with the $900K, that is one less thing we have to worry about, or then maybe we figure something else on our list that we want to put our focus on. Mayor Bailey said on the skateboard park, I think at the moment, I think next year you do the asphalt or whatever and let’s see how things kind of wash out with some of your grant opportunities; and not even just for the skateboard park, I’m just saying at this point, the surface is bad, and one way or the other, we have to do the City Council Meeting January 22, 2025 Page 10 of 20 surface. The rest of the stuff, I guess we’ll have to wait and see, and we did naming rights at the Ice Arena, which helped us, so that might be something we want to look at, if somebody might be interested in that. Council Member Olsen asked is that surface a subcontracted project, or would we try to do that ourselves? Director Dockter replied no, I think we’d go to a concrete surface, so I wouldn’t want to try to do that. Council Member Garza said and we already have $100K in the budget, already allotted to that. So, we’re looking to improve it, and you don’t know what that number is that you would need additionally to that $100K? Director Dockter asked for the equipment? Council Member Garza replied yes. Director Dockter said well, going back in time, we were going to replace that just about ten years ago, and then we worked with the Council, and said actually, the equipment’s not in bad shape if you spend $10K each year to maintain it or replace any bad surfacing, touching anything up, and then add in a new feature every year; that worked out great. So, you can do that, or you can spend $10K-$15K a year and just kind of continue it every year if you can keep it up and you add to it, or you can kind of spend $100K at one time and then get it done. So, there’s a couple different options to it; I think sometimes there’s some benefit to doing it a little bit over time because then they see that’s it being continually upgraded, some people really appreciate that, at least they did last time. So, those are a couple options, but the focus is on the surface right now. I would say maybe we up that to $115K for the first year, replace the surface, while we’re there let’s fix up the equipment and at least get it back into its original shape, maybe add one small feature. We have a really great group to work with, and then after we do that, we could get the skateboard community together and start talking about okay, we’re going to keep this equipment, but what else can we do to make it better? And then maybe that’s when we come up with a plan. Council Member Garza asked are you working with the people that did the skateboard park up on Meadow Grass? Council Member Olsen asked, do you mean the Bike Park? Council Member Garza said, oh, that’s a Bike Park. Council Member Olsen said yes, that’s a different group. Director Dockter said well, funny enough, that gentleman also has a skateboard group, so he would help me get the youth involved with the process; so, he’s actually helped me quite a bit with that. Mayor Bailey asked is that still Chan? Director Dockter replied Chan, yes, but he’s been pretty good at grabbing skateboarders and bikers together, and we just kind of thought we could use his design team. Council Member Olsen said he’s still trying to raise money for improvements to the Bike Park, too. Mayor Bailey said so, that’s my take, and I think as, let’s say you come back to us and you say hey, you know what? There’s a grant available for an amphitheater, I’m just picking something off the list, or Art Walk Garden or whatever, for $250K; if I get that, that means we’ve got to come up with the other $250K, right? And, so, that’s why I’m saying if you look at some of these, the smaller numbers aren’t going to do anything for us; and then, of course, Council at budget time, looking at CIPs and such for the future, can also take a look at what makes sense, right? But that’s why I specifically talked about the sports lighting; and frankly, maybe we do sit down with the Athletic Association regarding those other two ballfields. Director Dockter said yes, I plan to; well, first, I wanted to hear what the Council had to say. Mayor Bailey said I mean, yes, it benefits our citizens and the families and so on, but the fact of the matter is it would be nice to get that park finally finished; it’s been going on for 20, 30, 40 years now, it’d be nice to finally see it finished. Council Member Thiede said another thought just popped into my head, but like the lighting at some of the sports fields and such, you know, right now it may be cooling off for sales, but like Xcel or something like that, it would definitely soar; could actually some of that lighting be powered by solar, and is there any type of grants or rebates or anything like that, that Xcel or someone could provide, to help fund some of that? Director Dockter replied so, I’ve actually been studying this and met with several people at the trade shows I was at, solar is coming a long way, right? They’re actually doing like streetlights now, which are very big things in a year, so they’ve really found a way to design for that. I don’t think they’re quite into sports lighting yet, just because there’s so many things, but it can’t be very far out. So, I’ll dig into it more and see what our options are. Mayor Bailey asked Director Dockter does that give you some guidance then? City Council Meeting January 22, 2025 Page 11 of 20 Director Dockter replied yeah, I guess the only thing is, was there anything on there that you just said no, to take it off there? I don't think I heard anything, and we’ll talk about River Oaks later, but is there anything on here where we don’t want to talk about it or anything? Mayor Bailey replied no, I think the only one on here that I would say, and it’s really up to you, Zac, when I was at the Athletic Association meeting, there were more nos about synthetic fields than yeses. So, I mean, if you personally wanted to take that off, I would have zero concern about it on that particular item, just because I hear it, and I know Jim Fohrman and crew, they were not keen on it, at least that’s what I understood. Council Member Olsen said well, I don’t like synthetic, I mean, its a lot; and what you did with the Ice Arena, in terms of putting down the field turf and stuff, and then we use that, I think, that way. Mayor Bailey said yeah, so, if you’re looking at this list, I would say the synthetic fields can come off; I would leave the rest for now. I mean, the splashpad, we need to take that one off, too. Council Member Olsen said yeah, I don’t think that’s really a thing. Director Dockter said there, there, and anything on the bottom is we’re kind of waiting for an opportunity? Mayor Bailey replied I think waiting for an opportunity because I like what the look and what you’re trying to do. We do hear from our Arts Committee group in the community who wants to do something with like an amphitheater, etc. in the future, so, there might be some opportunity there; so, I wouldn’t take that off the list. And River Oaks would be, like you said, we’ll figure that out when we get into the Business Planning for River Oaks. Council Member Olsen said, yeah, we’ll do that update with Dennis. Director Dockter said thank you for your direction, I appreciate it. Mayor Bailey said you got it, thanks, Zac. Council Member Olsen asked Administrator Levitt does that fill in the blanks for you? Administrator Levitt replied absolutely, we just needed to make sure if there was anything that you deleted from 2025, or in 2026, that we could do that. So, we have that direction. Council Member Olsen asked Brenda, does that make sense? Director Malinowski replied yes. Mayor Bailey said that way you’re not having to do plug this hole with that hole, at least for 2025; 2026, maybe not. Council Member Olsen said largely, we’re in a holding pattern. Mayor Bailey said all right, and asked if Council had any other questions on that one; there were none. B. New Development Boulevard Tree Requirements Staff Recommendation: Approve the removal of boulevard trees adjacent to homes in new developments and allow staff to begin the process of updating City Ordinances to reflect this change. Mayor Bailey said we’ll move to 13B, which is New Development Boulevard Tree Requirements, and Ryan Burfeind, Public Works Director, will kick this off. Director Burfeind said Gary Orloff, our Streets Superintendent, and our City Forester, Nate Heilman, are here if there are any maintenance-specific questions, we’ll talk about those as well. Director Burfeind said we had this initial discussion with Council in July, 2024, when we had our Public Works Workshop. We talked about a lot of these topics, some of the issues we were seeing. Council gave us direction and additional things we should look into; we’ve done that, we intended to bring it back a little sooner, but we had a windstorm and we had all the fallout from the windstorm, and we had another workshop on the windstorm, so it just delayed bringing this back to Council. So, that’s what we’re here to discuss tonight. Just a reminder, right now, we have about 14,500 boulevard trees in our existing inventory in the City Right-of- Way that we do maintain, and those are not the ones that we’re worried about tonight; those are trees that we already have in our Right-of-Way. I do feel strongly, even though some cities do it differently, that we should be maintaining those, there’s a liability with them and it is on our Right-of-Way, that we should maintain. City Council Meeting January 22, 2025 Page 12 of 20 So, this is more about the new developments and all those challenges that we’re seeing, but also new developments are growing our tree inventory and increasing our budget. On the bottom, you can see those three items that I kind of kicked off back in July, the budgetary challenges, and then really the other two main ones are more of a feasibility standpoint with the reduced lot size and the overall setbacks for the front yard. So, we’re really kind of pinching that area that we have for trees in the front yard and the boulevard, and then interference with our infrastructure as well. Looking back, we’ve had some significant increases in the past ten years; we have had several budget additions over the years related to the Forestry budget. Just this last budget cycle, Council approved additional for our EAB treatment as we keep up on a three-year cycle. We actually switched to a six-year tree-trimming program, instead of five. Even with that, we still had a $50K budget add just to maintain that; six is about as far as we’re comfortable pushing that, working with our current forester and our management analyst, who is our former City forester, really with the trees that we’re maintaining, we should keep it no more than a six-year cycle. One way that we’ve mitigated budget adds over the years is we had a much bigger program, and we were removing hundreds, if not thousands, of Ash trees in a year; we had a much bigger program and expense to cover that, anywhere from $130K to $200K. As we’ve gotten down to our desired goal of about 1,500 Ash trees, we’ve been moving those funds with each budget from Ash tree removal to maintenance; so, that’s allowed us to minimize the budget add. So, that funding source has really been tapped out, we’ve just kind of moved all those over to tree trimming and tree removal, so you will start to see more budget adds in the future years as we kind of move those funds over. Just on the budget as a whole, you can see on the right what makes up the budget, all the different items, $614K is our 2025 budget. I did want to do a little bit of a comparison for some other Public Works budgets that are kind of similar in the sense that there hasn’t been big changes in the programs and how we do business differently; it’s just frankly Forestry, Snowplowing, Signs, as the cities grow, those programs have grown, and we’re trying to maintain a similar level of service. You can see Forestry really stands out, a 90% increase over ten years, and that’s with switching to a six-year trimming cycle instead of five. So, a little bit of an actually reduced level of service and still a 90% increase. Snowplowing is 65%, and Street Signs is a great comparison, of course, as we develop, we add streets, we add signs, and we’re only at 32% over that ten-year period. Some of the big changes, the contracted maintenance costs has been the big one, and even with revising to that six-year trimming cycle, it’s been a big impact. Trimming costs are up over 500% in the ten-year period and then 90% for tree planting. Just for a comparison, at our current number of trees in our current budget, we’re about $42 per boulevard tree per year; so, with the new developments if we’re adding around 500 trees a year, you have about $20K just in the new trees, let alone inflation and all the other costs that go into it. What we have here is a table comparing the exact same area, so it’s ten years apart, and the same area of tree trimming, and in the winter of 2014 to 2015, it cost $31K; this year, if we had to switch to a six-year cycle, we’re at $210K. Council Member Thiede asked is that cost per tree solely contracting somebody to do it? Director Burfeind replied that is, yes. So, these are all trees greater than 8”, so we trim up to 8” trees; we have the training, the staff, and really the equipment to do trees up to 8”. When they start getting bigger, we need cranes and different types of equipment that we just don’t have. So, yes, that cost per tree, that’s really your cost of inflation, right? That’s the actual bid prices, and we get multiple bids from many vendors throughout the metro to try to get the best cost that we can. The quantity of trees also has gone up, not because we added more trees, but because more trees grew from the under 8” category to the over 8” category; so, they went from a City- trimmed tree to a contractor-trimmed tree. The other big reason the costs went up, if you look at ten years ago, most of the trees were in the 8”-to-15”, now most of the trees are in the 16”-to-20”, in this category. So, the trees are growing, but it’s the budget, that’s not being hit by inflation, it’s hit by the actual tree growth. So, our roads don’t get wider, we don’t have wider roads to plow each year; if anything, the roads are getting narrower. This is actually growing exponentially for those reasons, and that’s why we see that over 500% cost increase. Now, I’m getting on board with the practical side; that’s the budget side, right? And if there’s a desire for the boulevard trees, with the right budget we will maintain those trees and we will do that task. The other issue is more of a feasibility we’ve been seeing, and this has been kind of creeping up the past few years. You can see City Council Meeting January 22, 2025 Page 13 of 20 changes in lot sizes and setbacks since 2000 to present; obviously, in the present case, not all lots are 42’ wide, but we see a lot in the 40’, 45’, and 50’ lots these days. The 50’ lots are considered like a standard single-family lot, not 85’, what a wide lot used to be, and the setbacks as low as 20’, so that distance from the garage to the sidewalk is that much narrower. This is from Settlers Bluff, and we’re seeing a lot of this now where our streetlights, our hydrants, our different utility infrastructure that goes on the lot line. We used to have 55’-to-60’ in that space to plant a boulevard tree, and now we’re down to, in this case, about 20’; you can see the impact that a big tree like that will have over time. We had already made a switch to go to every other lot with boulevard trees a couple years ago. Even with that, we’re still running into cases by doing every other lot, we’re running into trees right by hydrants, the curb boxes obviously are very close to these trees. We’re seeing an issue that’s been created with that. So, like we talked about at that budget workshop, really our request for consideration and a recommendation is to no longer require the boulevard tree, just adjacent to new residential lots; rather, we would require a front-yard tree. One of the discussions at the budget workshop was are we shifting costs for residents that didn’t use to have a front-yard tree and now they do. One thing I want to make mention is up until lots got so small, it was pretty standard to have a boulevard tree and a front-yard tree. So, we’re not kind of increasing that maintenance cost to the homeowners, we just reached the point where we don’t have room for both. We used to have maybe a boulevard tree on one side of the driveway and a front-yard tree on the other, and we just don’t have that room anymore. So, when we say a front-yard tree requirement, it would be a change to the Code to make sure developers are always planting one front-yard tree so we have a uniform wooded streetscape. Another thing that I’ll talk a little more on the next screen is when lots are 50’ or less, we still have a concern, even if it’s a front-yard tree with that canopy size. We do want to get height, and little crabapple trees and little magnolias aren’t going to give a streetscape; we want 34’-to-50’ tall trees, so actually our forester did some great work and developed a list of good potential front-yard trees in these smaller lots that will still give a nice height to the forest in the area. Obviously, major roadways, commercial areas, and neighborhood collector streets, like Mississippi Dunes Boulevard, that don’t have home frontage, we would still plant boulevard trees that the City would maintain; we want to make sure that we have a consistent, kind of wooded feel throughout our town. So, we would continue to plant those along the boulevards. Another question that came up at the budget workshop was do we have this in other communities? This is a map that we also had and we had some discussion; the areas in yellow are areas that for one reason or another over the years boulevard trees were not required in those developments. So, this isn’t something new, we did have many areas that did not have boulevard trees in the past, so we’re kind of going back to that trend. These were all bigger lots, and there are probably different reasons for not having boulevard trees, but those are the areas that exist today. These are small-stature trees we’re going to call them, so if a lot is 50’ or less, we would look at this type of tree planted in the front yard. You can see some of them, we’ll whittle it down, some of these crabapples, 25’, are maybe not quite the height we’re looking for, but a lot of 30’, 40’, even 50’ tall trees, but the spread gets no more than 30’; so, you can still have a nice height of those trees in the neighborhood, but they aren’t going to spread out and touch the neighbor’s house, hang over the street, and cause all the other issues. Another question that we talked about a little bit, and we got some more feedback from additional cities since our budget workshop, with what are some similar cities doing. We wanted to look at developing cities with that suburban feel, so these are five cities that are managing that, that we spoke to; we wanted to get a feel for what are they requiring and what are their reasons for doing that. Rosemount: They do not do boulevard trees anymore, but yard trees are required on each lot. Woodbury: Is one out of these five that still does require boulevard trees, but they assign the maintenance to the homeowner or the HOA. For me, that’s not something that I’m super comfortable with because like I said, there’s liability with these trees and it has an impact to the public; I would not want that on the homeowners. We do ask them to mow the grass, but the grass can’t fall over and injure or kill somebody. So, it’s very different for me for a boulevard tree. Apple Valley: Doesn’t do boulevard trees or actually in the utility easements; that’s the first 10’ of the yard behind the sidewalks, they don’t allow it there either. They’re not comfortable with them in that location. Inver Grove Heights: Does not allow trees in the Right-of-Way in new developments. Savage: Requires two trees per lot, but they do require them on private property. City Council Meeting January 22, 2025 Page 14 of 20 So, you are seeing more cities go this way, and they’re voicing similar concerns: Lot sizes, setbacks, costs, and just trying to make sure we can fit trees in the right location. This is a picture that I showed at the workshop, but I wanted to show it again because I think that it does a really nice job of showing that even without the boulevard trees specifically, I think there’s a really similar feel to the neighborhoods. This is in Mississippi Dunes Estates, this is not a boulevard tree. This is an area of Timber Ridge, some of Timber Ridge doesn’t have boulevard trees, but this is an area of the Timber Ridge neighborhood that does; with this picture, it’s a similar-age neighborhood, similar tree heights, I think it’s a very similar feel, that we’re going to have that wooded tree streetscape. The other thing with the development tree requirements in the new lots, I was talking to Emily, right now with the above 60’-wide lots, there are three private trees, and if it’s below 60’, there are two. I think now if there’s not a boulevard tree, we can probably change that a little bit. We don’t want to reduce the overall trees in the neighborhood, but I think maybe 70’ on up would be four, and maybe 50’-to-60’, to 65’, would be three, 40’-to-50’ would be two. So, we’d want to keep a similar number of trees in the neighborhood, just in a more appropriate location, rather than the boulevards. Director Burfeind said with that, there’s a staff recommendation, and I’ll be happy to answer any questions. Mayor Bailey said just a quick question from me, just to refresh my memory, boulevard trees are generally paid for by the developer, correct? Director Burfeind replied yes. Mayor Bailey said and then we’re just responsible for them after the fact. Director Burfeind replied correct, yes. Mayor Bailey said so, if you’re getting down to these 40’ and 45’ lots, so to speak, are three trees feasible on a lot that size? Director Burfeind replied I think we would stick with two on the 40’-to-50’ lots, and we’d look to have a little more on that 50’+, 70+ range. Mayor Bailey said here’s my only concern; I agree, I don’t think we can increase the trees, but here’s my concern for you: That is, do you then see developers coming in, saying well, I’m not going to build a 55’ lot because I’m going to be required to put four trees on it, or three trees, there’s a cost. Do you know what I’m saying? So, I’m wanting to make sure that we’re not going to force them to push down on lot sizes in order to pay less because they’re going to have less trees. I mean, if the tree prices are what you’re saying, and we’re paying for them, I mean, you’d think their developments times that, we’re going to get a tighter development, I think. So, I just tell you this, however you guys want to do it; personally speaking, I’m totally fine with the direction you’re going and doing away with the boulevard trees, but somehow you have to figure out what that magic number is for those. Or maybe if it’s a lot at 40’ with two trees, maybe there’s, I don't know, I almost want to say an extra fee or something; I’m just worried that we’re going to force developers to go smaller. Do I have reason to be concerned? Administrator Levitt replied mayor and members of the Council, I don’t think we do because really they’re paying the install fee and it’d be like a 2.5”-or-3” caliper tree; so, if it’s $350 or $450, that’s the only thing the developer is paying, right? In the equation, if you change the amount of trees, you’re only talking $500. The other thing is the developer will tell you trees bring value. So, they’re not going to push back at our quantity, and they shouldn’t back out or push back at our development removing the Right-of-Way trees, the boulevard trees. They had to plant it, and they didn’t have any stake in the game, per se, because the homeowners didn’t have to maintain them anyway. So, the quantity of trees is only the original install price of the trees, not any long-term maintenance costs. Mayor Bailey said okay. Director Burfeind said and I think the other thing we could do is we can take, we can look at those numbers and let’s say a real world development, like Prairie Dunes, we could do a comparison if we still require boulevard trees. Because the builder/developer pays for all of the yard trees and the boulevards, so, if we’re just kind of shifting it into the yard. We can make sure there’s a similar quantity, to maybe keep it cost neutral. Mayor Bailey said that’s really what I’m looking for, because on the other side, I just didn’t want housing developers then to start pushing more narrow lots, smaller lots, just for the sake of trying to save money on a 200- home development times two trees; I mean, on a single home, that might be nothing, but it will definitely be something on the grand scheme of things. City Council Meeting January 22, 2025 Page 15 of 20 Director Burfeind said yes, but we can look hard at that and make sure about that overall quantity; and that is our goal, to keep a really similar quantity of trees in the neighborhood and all that stuff. Emily Schmitz, Community Development Director, said and I think it’s important to know when we rewrote our Codes, this is one thing, and this was a conversation, how are we making sure we can handle the market? And so we didn’t reduce the yard trees about a year and a half ago. I can say there was certainly a positive response, realizing that we’re trying to keep that, too. Mayor Bailey said and then I’m going to pop one more question, and it’s mainly more for Emily, but you said it kind of got brought up in this about the commercial side of things. Please, as we look at more commercial developments and the fact I know you said we want to continue to do trees; I’m not saying we shouldn’t, but I also want to be very cognizant of where we put those trees on those commercial nodes. Because plopping a tree when we’ve got a monument sign right there, that’s going to cover the monument sign, makes no sense. And the same with bushes and things like that, that we do in some of these developments, and we have a lot of examples around our community right now that just don’t make any sense. With that, I’m all for the green and the trees, but let’s make sure they’re strategically placed, and if it doesn’t work, it doesn’t work. Council Member Olsen said so, before I ask my questions of staff, I want to ask Council Member Garza, as you buy and sell properties, does this subject come up? Council Member Garza replied it does, all the time. Council Member Olsen said okay, and what are you hearing in terms of? Council Member Garza replied so the subject only comes up on the aged trees; so, when we go and look at homes that are on sale, this conversation is not in new construction, it’s only in resale. And that is a big concern of the buyers that come into buy resold properties that this tree and the roots could possibly cause them some type of headache down the line. So, and that was something, and I’m glad you asked me that, because that came to my mind, I was sitting here wondering if we put one tree in the middle of the yard on a 40’ lot, in 30 years, will that root system cause troubles for that tenant, or? Director Burfeind replied yeah, that’s a good question. I think the general rule of thumb, and we can dig more into it, but those smaller crown trees that we’re looking at, generally will have smaller root systems, similar to that crown size. So, I think that’s where we’d want to keep with those smaller crown trees and not be planting like full size and some of the new Elms that could definitely be an issue. Council Member Garza said and that’s a big deal, so, thank you for that. Council Member Olsen said yeah, and one of the reasons I asked is I learned a lot when Gary and Gavin came to my house to teach me about the fact that I had a front-yard tree and not a boulevard tree, and we needed to replace the tree. And Gavin gave me some amazing advice, this is what you don’t want to do, this is what you do want to do, and it was really all about the species of the tree, how it roots, how it grows, the size; and one of the things he mentioned in that conversation is there’s significant benefit to having an urban forest that provides a degree of protection and shade for your asphalt, on your road, and all that kind of stuff, too. And, so, that’s why communities do it; it’s not just the beautification thing, there’s actually legitimate like benefits to it. But the concern, as Council Member Garza just told us, is what happens with any sort of infrastructure that you might have on a boulevard or whatever, and as those lots get smaller and you showed us the picture, they’re just too close, they just are. I mean, that’s just a fact. So, I mean, I’m all for the idea of moving away from boulevard trees and moving towards more of your front-yard trees and those sorts of things, but I think that comes with a degree of education. And I think we need to work closely with developers to help them understand this is what our goal is, this is what our target is, and if that means that we need to limit the species that they can choose from, then so be it. I think we build that into the Code, meaning it’s not a recommendation, it’s the requirement, it’s one of these, and that’s kind of it, because otherwise, we’re going to set ourself up for trouble. And the last thing any homeowner wants, whether they’re the original homeowner, whether they’re the new buyer, is a surprise in two, three, four, five years, where suddenly they’ve got a root issue that’s messing with something that we have in an easement or something like that, and it becomes their problem. Because those front-yard trees, that’s our deal; City Council Meeting January 22, 2025 Page 16 of 20 that was one of the other things Gavin helped me understand was like, yeah, this is on your dime now. So, he was very good about helping me figure out what to do, but the cost is borne by the homeowner. And I don’t agree with the Woodbury perspective of well, we’re going to require boulevard trees and we’re going to pass the cost onto the homeowner and the HOA. I don’t think that’s the right thing to do, it sounds like you don’t think that either. Director Burfeind said yes, I don’t agree. And from an education perspective, now that Gavin is in the office with me and Zac, I think he’s a great resource to provide the education for our homeowners, developers, whatever it may be. And in the Code, we’ve got it at a minimum; what we want to do is on our smaller lot sizes, we’re going to mandate a maximum spread. We were talking about understory trees as well; a crabapple might be 20’ tall and 19’ wide, so that’s not going to help. So, we’re going to mandate a maximum spread, I want to say 30’, but then a minimum height, so we’re making sure we still have some tall trees with the shade and all the benefits the shade brings. Council Member Olsen said so, we also need to educate and I know I’m preaching to the choir on this, but we need to educate, you know, what does the maintenance look like? How often do you do it? What is a reputable maintenance company vs. trying to do it yourself? Because if you think back to EAB, when Steve Bowe came in front of us, remember, and he was telling us about this is what we’re going to need to do. One of the big challenges we dealt with for the first year and a half or two years is a lot of people thought they had a boulevard tree, and it was going to be our cost, and it wasn’t. There were some mighty upset folks at that point that went, wait a minute, this is going to cost me. So, I just think that education element is going to be really critical. Council Member Garza said I have another question, too. Are we finding or seeing, a lot of our community is old and a lot of our trees are 40, 50, 60 years old. So, I see a lot of times, I do a lot of sewer scopes, and I see a lot of damage to our underground piping, especially to the City pipes. So, I’m wondering, are we starting to see some of that happening to our infrastructure? Director Burfeind replied yeah, we do see more of that. For our City-owned infrastructure, we have a nice sewer preventative program that has largely mitigated that. But as we age, and our trees have aged, we were seeing more of that. That was another discussion with the smaller lots where that front-yard tree might have to be over the sewer, as a boulevard tree would anyway. It’s just looking at the root depth, right, and using trees that don’t have the capacity of a root stem. Council Member Garza said I’ve seen some nasty ones, so that’s why I asked. Council Member Olsen asked are we still slip lining and doing all that? Director Burfeind replied yes, we just, roots forming are the main thing, we have to cycle the slip lining, and that’s our primary thing. We’ve done different slip-lining projects with pavement management when we see damages, but the roots forming in our infrastructure is in our right-of-way. Gary Orloff, Streets Superintendent, said on the street side, what we’re seeing is a lot of sidewalk damage now from these mature trees, so we fixed $80K worth of sidewalks last year; 70% was all from the trees, roots and stuff, so we did that because we had to, for everybody. So, that’s what we’re really seeing now with these big, mature trees; they’re really pushing up sidewalks and curbs, people’s driveways. Council Member Olsen said so there again, the species they choose can mitigate that to some degree, right? Director Burfeind replied yes. Mayor Bailey asked is everybody good on the change? All Council Members indicated they were. Director Burfeind said thank you; Mayor Bailey said all right, thank you, Ryan and Gary. C. Modifications to the Issuing of Temporary Certificates of Occupancy Staff Recommendation: Review and provide direction on the proposed clarification of the TCO process limiting the issuance of a TCO between June 1 and October 1. Issuance of a TCO between June 1 and October 1 requires $8,000 escrow prior to issuance. Mayor Bailey stated Emily is going to take us through this exciting item. City Council Meeting January 22, 2025 Page 17 of 20 Director Schmitz stated thank you for hanging in there for this. We’re going to be talking more about Temporary Certificates of Occupancy (TCOs), what is it? So, we’re going to start at the bare roots, grassroots, so you all understand it. A TCO is issued before a full CO; we offer this opportunity for the process to continue to move forward while some of the items are not complete. Now, I want to be cautious when I say that: It does not mean that there are building life safety items that have not been completed, and we’re letting folks move into this home. Specifically, exterior items, all final building inspection items will have been completed as soon as these exterior items are done. This process started I would say well over a decade ago, and it was started to be sure that we could give communities the processes, especially in the winter months in Minnesota. So, this process allows folks to buy their homes, move into their homes, and hold the builder accountable once they’ve had a chance to finish the needed details. I added a photo of current stock; just honestly, before my time in here, I could have never guessed what in the world that was or why it was here, but truly, it’s important, as we make sure that these homes are ready for occupancy, ultimately to maintain that inspection process. So, what does our existing TCO due process look like? This looks crazy, right, that whole document; it’s not that crazy, but it is time consuming. So, once the final building inspections are complete, but let’s just hypothetically say it’s January, and then we wait until the summer; so, we’re working to make sure that the as-built survey is submitted and reviewed by our Engineering team. This is making sure that the final grades of that lot meets the grading standards and is reviewed and approved; all the water is going to go where we agreed that it should go. Let’s say it’s approved; the builder or developer can go ahead and put their sod in and their boulevard tree. Once those items are installed, they send staff a request and say, hey, I’ve got these items done, can you come out and inspect? And we’re, absolutely, as this means the work is completed. But if we go out there and find that neither the sod or the boulevard tree are not completed, they fail, and we go back and we start all over. A lot of times what’s happening is we say, hey, we were out there, the sod wasn’t installed, let us know once it is, and a lot of times that communication is then dropped. We’ve put the ball back in their court, and we’re not hearing back. So, again, that continues the process. Now, hypothetically, we get through this entire process, we get the sod in and the boulevard tree, the curb stop’s been inspected, its keyable, it works, the whole nine yards. We do eventually issue that final CO, but this process can certainly take some time, depending on if there are problems on that road before they’re resolved. So, why am I standing here, having this conversation with you? These numbers really tell it all. We’ve got some awesome staff who are hands on in this process, and they’ve raised their hands and they’ve said, hey, this isn’t working, this isn’t efficient; how can we look at this and be better? What this is showing, in 2024, and this is by builder or developer, how many TCOs did we issue in 2024, between the months of, I believe warmer months, between May and the end of September? Astonishingly, for each of these developments, well above 50% of the TCOs that we’ve been issuing, we’ve been issuing in months for all of these items that I just talked about (boulevard trees, sod, curb box inspections, canopy stuff); the weather is not impacting their ability to get those things completed. So, a big red flag, and what was our takeaway? About 40% of the time those TCOs are being issued between April and November. So, how do we look at this differently to limit the TCOs in those months? I think the biggest thing is referencing there’s no cost recovery for that process; so, when we go back in this timeline, as we continue to jump back and forth on this timeline, send reminders, follow ups, hey, you still have it out there, we aren’t getting any cost recovery and there’s no fee associated with it. We do hold the escrow to make sure that process is going, but this process does take a lot of staff time. So, communication is one of the safest things. Obviously, our builders have become accustomed, we’ve helped, we’ve supported them through some ups and downs in the market. We always wanted to be a community that was willing to support our builders and developers, which we have been. I think now we’re at a point where we can say, listen, between May and September, these exterior items can be done. However, we still offer this opportunity to you between October and May of the following year. There are several ways that we’re going to communicate this out to these builders: Every year we do try to gather our builders together, checking, looking into different ways with staff, and builders, here are some things as a reminder from a staff perspective to help this process flow smoothly. We have really good conversations, so that’s planned for March. City Council Meeting January 22, 2025 Page 18 of 20 We’ll work on a Draft Policy, which I want to be clear we’ve never had; so, this Policy is really going to help us have some guidelines, as well as standards, that we can follow and really help to educate the builders that this is the standards you need to meet. And then, finally, we are going to include some language in our Development Agreement (DA) moving forward. Those that are out there are staying the way that they are, we aren’t changing those. Moving forward, we want to make sure that it is clear in those DAs, as early in the process as we can that yes, a TCO is an option between the months of October and May; in those warmer months, they still are an option, however, we will require an additional $8K escrow fee submitted during those warmer months as better protection for us, as a City. You’re telling us you’re truly going to get this done in a timely manner, and we have to stay on top of this. So, again, what we’re ultimately proposing is to say TCOs will be issued all year round; however, if you need one between the months of May and October, an additional $8K escrow is required. We’ll be changing that. Director Schmitz asked if there were any questions; Mayor Bailey replied let’s start with Council Member Olsen, but I have a couple, too. Council Member Olsen said so, I know we’ve done TCOs since, well, we’ve been doing them forever. I know that to your point, in the winter months, it’s a very useful tool. That data that you provided, with respect to the number of TCOs in the warmer months, is certainly, I don't know if concerning is the word but interesting. So, here’s my question: Did we ask why? Director Schmitz replied we have had conversations specifically with one builder for a certain situation, and what we’ve recognized is the City’s making it easy, and we’ve been complacent as staff to let them continue that process. When we went out and had conversations with other communities, TCOs are options, but they certainly try to stay away from them, especially in the summer months. So, I would say of the communities we had conversations with, we are the most complacent. Council Member Olsen said so, in my experience, which is not nearly to the degree you guys have, TCOs are much more common in the commercial developments than they are in residential developments. The reason I asked you the question, did we ask why, is because I’d like to know if there’s a legitimate reason behind why a TCO may make sense; the example that was running through my brain is we’re in 2025, but it just seems like yesterday we were dealing with COVID. One of the things that that did is it put the supply chain into absolute pandemonium, and so, it’s entirely possible that somebody would be in a position where they’re asking for a TCO due to a delay in delivery of supplies or materials of nonessential items. Like you mentioned, we’re not talking about life safety or anything like that. To me, that would be a legitimate reason. I also think it’s true, as we all know from our experience with builders and developers, that sometimes they like to take the path of least resistance, that is the least expensive. When you put dollars and cents, like you’re suggesting, behind one of their decision points, they may make a different decision. So, I don’t disagree with that at all. But I just don’t want to be penalizing somebody if they have a truly legitimate concern; you know, your building specs called for Widget A vs. Widget B, and Widget A is on backorder for the next three months. Do you follow me? Director Schmitz replied, I do, I do, and I think that’s why an escrow is glued to a TCO. This isn’t something we’re going to keep. Council Member Olsen replied right, they’ll recapture that if they meet the timeline requirements. Director Schmitz they’ll recapture it, but we want you to prove to us that things are getting done. Council Member Olsen said and look, it is entirely legitimate that we have a concern about not being able to capture revenue for that additional inspection time, that additional administrative time, as those things all cost money. It’s like when people make a public data request, that’s not free, it’s not free, right? We have people who have to find stuff and copy stuff, and there’s a cost to all of that. But I just, again, I just want to make sure that weren’t not being punitive in situations where we really maybe shouldn’t be. Does that make sense, am I saying that right, Jennifer? Administrator Levitt replied yes. Mayor and Council, you kind of asked what’s driving it, so I’ll give you my two cents. Obviously, labor and management is not very good in regards to building trades, right? Because the superintendent has to be able to program out, if they have a closing on July 1st, they have to speculate and coordinate when the tree’s going to get installed and when the sod’s going to get laid. City Council Meeting January 22, 2025 Page 19 of 20 Council Member Olsen said yeah, because they have different groups that are coming in to do that work. Administrator Levitt replied correct. So, if you think about it, so, they’re not, that’s one factor and they’re obviously just coordinating with the closing date. So, one of the other things is, let’s think about this as a builder, you have 20 lots, and you close on those 20 lots in May, June, and July; you’ve got the cash and haven’t sodded those lots, but you’re going to sod them all in August. And, so, it’s cheaper for you to do it, you’re going to sod 20 lots all on the same day. I think maybe one neighborhood has probably experienced that, right, where you receive the sod, and the company is just coming in and laying sod on all 20 lots. It’s more cost effective, right? But now let’s think about those homeowners that were in those 19 other homes; they had dirt lawns all summer because they were not motivated to sod those lots individually, as they had been. And, so, that’s where I would say those builders are taking advantage of our homeowners and taking advantage of our generosity. Council Member Olsen said well, and they’re hanging onto that cash. Administrator Levitt replied exactly, and all they would have to do is be able to coordinate the schedules, and that’s really an option that developer-builder have. And, so, the people who are being penalized are our residents because what happens is those lots sit all summer, and I’m sure you’ve seen it, right? You’ve seen the silt fence, and you’ve seen the mulch sprayed all over, and then you see rivets all over the place, and these people have installed their irrigation, and now they’re out there regrading it, they’ve damaged the irrigation and all this stuff, right? The people who will continue to pay are our residents and not us. I mean, can you tell I’m becoming irritated? It bothers me because they’re really taking advantage of our residents, and the residents want us to have some leverage, right? But trust me, over the 20 years, I’ve had plenty of people crying to me, “I’m supposed to close on Friday, I need a Temp CO.” Yep, that happens, right? But now we have a mechanism, if your builder didn’t do it, he has to give us $8K. Council Member Olsen said yeah, there’s a degree of accountability. Administrator Levitt replied, exactly. So, now that resident who’s going to get the TCO because they cried, which honestly, who does not want to close on their dream house, you know, on Friday, because they have the mover already scheduled? We’re not going to stand in the way, but your builder can post an $8K escrow, and he’ll be really motivated to get your sod and all that stuff done for you. So, if we do this, I’m telling you, they’re going to be a little bit irritated and you may hear about it, but at the end of the day, I feel like we’re protecting the residents. I’m sorry, Emily, I took all of your responses. Council Member Olsen asked Administrator Levitt, do you feel better now? She replied, I do, I feel fine, thank you. Council Member Olsen said you look lighter, yes. Mayor Bailey said well, it’s interesting because I mean TCOs, I can totally see it during the winter for some of the things, but to have those kind of numbers over the summer months, that’s not right. Council Member Olsen said and again, in commercial developments, it is super common, I get it because of the scope. Council Member Garza said as a member of the Council, I think that’s a good idea, and especially some escrow; so, it’s not, we’re not charging them. Council Member Olsen said yeah, they can recapture that. Mayor Bailey asked what’s the original amount that’s in there, Emily? She replied the original builder escrow is somewhere around, and actually we just reevaluated it. Council Member Olsen asked it’s a percentage, is it not? Director Schmitz replied no, in the DA, it’s actually a number, so that includes sod, a boulevard tree, and then the inspection for the curb box. Right now, it’s about $7,200 for that escrow, and I want to be clear that number is more up-to-date with the cost of truly what it costs to sod a yard. We hadn’t reevaluated that for some time, and I think we learned that after that development. Council Member Olsen said yeah, after that development that went sideways. Council Member Garza said yeah, after the storm, we just learned all that. Director Schmitz said so at least that escrow would cover if or when you do have a developer who doesn’t do all of this. Mayor Bailey said okay. City Council Meeting January 22, 2025 Page 20 of 20 Council Member Olsen said yeah, you raised a good point about protecting the end user; I think that’s very valid. I’m good with it. Council Member Clausen agreed, and Council Member Thiede said yes, I agree. Mayor Bailey said there you go. Are there any other items to cover? Council Member Olsen asked you’re going to codify this, though, right? So, it’ll come before us in a Code that we’re going to need to approve? Director Schmitz replied so, this will be a Policy, as opposed to in our actual Code. But a Policy is just the same, and then at least we can hold them accountable in our Development Agreement moving forward; Administrator Levitt said and we’ll memorialize it, so there’s nothing hidden, and there’s no gain to us, it’ll be straight. Council Member Olsen said so, it will be baked right in, perfect. Council Member Clausen said I think we’ll hear some of that pushback. So, I’m just curious how they’ll explain why they didn’t do this in the summer in our community vs. the other communities where they have to get it done, why it’s just here. Council Member Olsen said right. 14. WORKSHOPS - CLOSED TO PUBLIC - None. 15. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Council Member Olsen, second by Council Member Thiede, to adjourn the meeting at 8:27 p.m. Motion carried: 5-0. Mayor Bailey said we’re adjourned, thanks everyone. Minutes prepared by Judy Graf and reviewed by Tamara Anderson, City Clerk. CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE  12800 Ravine Parkway  Cottage Grove, Minnesota 55016 www.cottagegrovemn.gov  651-458-2800  Fax 651-458-2897  Equal Opportunity Employer COTTAGE GROVE CITY COUNCIL January 22, 2025 12800 RAVINE PARKWAY SOUTH COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 COUNCIL CHAMBER - 7:00 P.M 1. CALL TO ORDER The City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, Washington County, Minnesota, held a regular meeting on January 22, 2025, at Cottage Grove City Hall, 12800 Ravine Parkway. Mayor Bailey called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The audience, staff, and City Council Members stood and recited the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. ROLL CALL City Clerk Tammy Anderson called the roll: Mayor Bailey-Here; Council Member Clausen-Here; Council Member Garza-Here; Council Member Olsen-Here; Council Member Thiede-Here. Also present: Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator; Tammy Anderson, City Clerk; Ryan Burfeind, Public Works Director; Zac Dockter, Parks and Recreation Director; Pete Koerner, Public Safety Director; Korine Land, City Attorney-LeVander, Gillen & Miller, PA; Brenda Malinowski, Finance Director; Emily Schmitz, Community Development Director; Gary Orloff, Streets Superintendent; Phil Jent, Communication Manager; Brad Peterson, Public Safety Captain. 4. OPEN FORUM Mayor Bailey opened the Open Forum. As no one wished to address the Council, Mayor Bailey closed the Open Forum. 5. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Motion by Council Member Thiede to approve the agenda; second by Council Member Clausen. Motion carried: 5-0. 6. PRESENTATIONS A. 2024 Annual Photo Contest Winners Staff Recommendation: Receive presentation on Capture Cottage Grove winners. Mayor Bailey said Phil Jents, our Communications Manager, is going to walk us through this; Mayor Bailey asked the Council Members to join him in front of the dais as the winners will eventually be invited up to take a picture with all of us. City Council Meeting January 22, 2025 Page 2 of 20 Communications Manager, Phil Jents, introduced himself, said he’s very happy, honored, and excited to be here tonight to talk about the 2024 Cottage Grove Annual Photo Contest. I told the folks I got to meet just a second ago that it’s one of those things that while communicating for the City is always fun and exciting, this is one of those things were our folks get to have a little extra fun seeing all the great photos that our residents send in, including the ones that we’re going to see here tonight. Manager Jents said as we all know, Cottage Grove is a beautiful place to live, and many of our residents are talented and creative, such as the ones here tonight who sent in photos; this is why we do the photo contest every year to capture some of that talent and creativity and the beauty that’s in our community. The Capture Cottage Grove contest has been an annual tradition I believe for about ten years or so, and we wrapped up 2024 with our photo contest that started on November and ran until December 9. All photos were considered for judging and were required to be from within the City of Cottage Grove itself and taken in the year 2024. We had categories for the photos: Life in Cottage Grove, Business in Cottage Grove, Cottage Grove Parks & Landmarks, and Faces of Cottage Grove. I’ll move through our excellent winners here. Life in Cottage Grove: Submitted by Angie Schaffer, with a photo titled “Morning Run.” This photo kind of explains itself, obviously, it’s a morning sunrise; I don't know exactly where that location is but I’m a little envious of the view there, and this was one of our excellent winners. Business in Cottage Grove: While that may not exactly look like a business, this photo submitted by Sabrina Thuringer, is titled “Easter Egg Hunt” at the Cottage Grove Ice Arena, with the model right here in the room with us; we’re very honored to have Grayson joining us. Again, it’s a photo that needs no explanation, it is just very adorable. Cottage Grove Parks & Landmarks: Submitted by Joseph Pavel, is titled “Smoke on the Water.” This was taken at Ravine Park, next door here. Joe said when I met him just a second ago that it’s kind of a rare occurrence to see the fog happening over the pond there, but he was there at the right time and right place and got a good photo, so thanks for that. Faces of Cottage Grove: Submitted by Ashley Thompson, and this must be Grizz, as the photo is titled “Grizz,” and that one needs no explanation; it’s just a very adorable photo of the dog. Manager Jents stated that’s really all I’ve got, other than in total we had a really good number of submissions, about 50 or so. It’s always really fun combing through those photos, and it’s hard to pick a favorite, but staff votes very diligently, reviewing all those photos. We’re very happy and honored to have you all here and for submitting those photos. He said mayor, I’ll turn it back to you. Mayor Bailey said fantastic. Before we have all of you come up to present you with a certificate and some money, I just want to thank all of you, obviously, for participating in this contest. We get to use these photos, as you know, I think you might have been already getting them to sign off on it, in our marketing materials to show a little bit more about Cottage Grove. When you look at our publications, our Visitors Bureau, all the different things that we have, we always like to incorporate some of the photos that our citizens are submitting over the years on some of our City publications. So, you will see some of these photos out there, which is part of the reason why staff has asked for permission to be able to utilize those photos. He asked all of the winners to come up, in front of the dais, where we will present you with the plaques and some money. Each of the Council Members took a photo, and the winning photographers each stood with their photo and a Council Member. After the winners were given their plaques and checks, a photograph was taken of all of the winners with Mayor Bailey and the City Council Members, and the winners were all congratulated. Mayor Bailey thanked Manager Jents for facilitating that presentation. 7. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve the November 20, 2024, City Council Regular Meeting Minutes. B. Approve the December 4, 2024, City Council Regular Meeting Minutes. C. Approve the December 18, 2024, City Council Regular Meeting Minutes. City Council Meeting January 22, 2025 Page 3 of 20 D. Approve the January 8, 2025, City Council Regular Meeting Minutes. E. Authorize issuance of a single-occasion gambling permit to David Gene Martin, on behalf of the Accacia Lodge No. 51, to conduct a raffle at 11094 70th Street South on October 4, 2025. F. Authorize issuance of a massage business license and massage therapist license to Savannah Marie Koenig at the location of Salons by JC (7240 East Point Douglas Road South, Suite 160, #36). G. Approve the agreement with Judith Graf for transcription services for 2025. H. Appoint the issuance of rental licenses to the properties listed in the attached table. I. Appoint Tony Khambata to fill the vacant seat on the Convention and Visitors Bureau Board of Directors to a three-year term ending on 12-31-2028. J. Approve and execute the non-criminal justice agency Joint Powers Agreement (NCJA JPA) with the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension. K. Accept the Pay Equity Report to be submitted to the State of Minnesota. L. Adopt Resolution 2025-09, authorizing the abatement of utility billing certification in the amount of $4,049.09. M. Adopt Ordinance 1092, amending the City Fee Table. N. Approve the increased budget amount of the Parks trailer from $22,000 to $23,898.88. O. Approve the Polco Confluence Inc. software subscription and support agreement in the amount of $29,300. P. Staff recommends the approval for the purchase of FlowMSP SaaS in the amount of $2,000 annually. Q. Staff recommends the approval of the KnowBe4 Security Awareness solution in the amount of $11,298. R. Approve the 3M Draft NPDES Permit Comments. S. Adopt Resolution 2025-010 authorizing final payment of $13,868.95 to Diverse Construction Services, LLC for the HERO Center Range Re-Roof project. T. Approve the Memorandum of Understanding with Washington County for the County 19A & 100th Street Project related to final design, environmental documentation, and municipal consent. Council Member Thiede wished to pull Item Q, KnowBe4 Security Awareness Add-on, on the Consent Agenda for further comment and/or discussion. Council Member Thiede stated as I was going through this, there is a new cost of a little over $11,000 a year, but I talked to Brian, our IT Manager, and we’re making some changes. It said in the description that we’re replacing something and so we’re actually replacing another product that we had, which was actually costing us close to $93,000 a year; so, it’s a good savings so our IT Department is doing a great job of looking at ways to save money for all of our residents and keep things more secure. I just wanted to let everybody know that, just in case you were wondering, as I was, when you were looking through that. Motion by Council Member Olsen to approve the Consent Agenda; second by Council Member Garza. Motion carried: 5-0. 8. APPROVE DISBURSEMENTS A. Approve disbursements for the period of 1-03-2025 through 1-16-2025 in the amount of $3,870,248.78. Motion by Council Member Garza to approve disbursements; second by Council Member Thiede. Motion carried: 5-0. 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS - None. 10. BID AWARDS - None. City Council Meeting January 22, 2025 Page 4 of 20 11. REGULAR AGENDA - None. 12. COUNCIL COMMENTS AND REQUESTS Council Member Garza said I really don’t have much to say today, but it looks like we have a few events happening, coming up pretty quick: Strawberry Fest is having their first Bingo, we have our tickets, and I’m excited for that, it’s on February 22 at 11:00 a.m., up at River Oaks. Other than that, you guys have a beautiful rest of the month, it’s going to end pretty quick. Council Member Thiede said well, she just took what I was going to talk about; Council Member Garza said I’m sorry, Council Member Thiede replied that’s okay. I just want to say that hopefully everybody’s been safe during our cold weather; I have to go get a new battery for the van as it kind of pooped out here in the cold weather. It’s just kind of shocking, I talked to my brother down in Kansas City, and he shows me pictures that they’ve gotten like over a foot of snow in the back yard; I told him I was jealous, as we hardly have anything. So, it’s kind of been a weird winter, then all this snow down south and so forth, I feel sorry for those people because they don’t have the means to really clean it off effectively. Other than that, be safe while it’s cold out. Council Member Olsen said my in-laws live in Gulf Shores, Alabama, and they are from Minnesota, so they know how to deal with snow. They sent me pictures today and there are six inches of snow on the beach in Gulf Shores, Alabama, and I don’t feel sorry for them a bit. So, there you go, how’s that? Council Member Olsen said I just wanted to make sure that the public was aware that this coming Saturday, January 25, is Hockey Day in Minnesota. Of course, every year when there’s Hockey Day in Minnesota, there are all kinds of events across the State; this event that I want to mention happens to be Hockey Fights Cancer, which is Minnesota Hockey Day’s kind of theme this year. We will be having events at the Cottage Grove Ice Arena on Saturday, all day. There will be lots of different things going on, but if you want to catch a really good game or two, the girls’ JV will be playing at 11:15, and the boys’ JV will be playing at 1:15, and then we will have the girls’ varsity playing at 1:15, and the boys’ varsity playing at 3:15. So, if you’re looking for a way to celebrate Hockey Day in Minnesota, watch a good game and maybe contribute to the theme of hockey fighting cancer, I’m sure you would be very welcome to attend any one of those games at the Cottage Grove Ice Arena this coming Saturday, January 25. You can also donate online if you’re unable to attend the event; I know there are a lot of people out of town for what they thought would be nice weather down in Florida and things like that. So, if you’re unable to come, you can also make that donation online; if you go to the Park High girls or boys hockey website, the donation link is on there. I’d read it to you, but it’s really long, so just go and look for it on the website and you can make a donation. Council Member Clausen stated being in the public eye, we generally hear a lot of comments from the public when things go well or don’t go so well, or they seek us out with their opinion. It was very nice to hear today, I was having a cup of coffee and a gentleman approached our group and wanted to say thank you to the Fire Department; there was a fire in town last weekend that required a mutual aid response from our partners in Hastings, Woodbury, St. Paul Park, and Newport, and if I missed somebody, I forgot. I don’t have permission to speak on behalf of that person, but he thanked our department for all of the help, and I just want to make sure that it flows down to our staff to know that we got a lot of good comments, and I want to make sure that they know about it. Council Member Olsen said that’s fantastic. Mayor Bailey said that is very good to see. Council Member Olsen said that happens a lot; believe it or not, we hear that from the public all the time, and it’s really gratifying. Mayor Bailey said I don’t really have anything for myself this evening since everything’s kind of been covered up here. I’m just going to let the public know that we do have three workshops that Council is going to be working with staff on this evening, after the meeting here: City Council Meeting January 22, 2025 Page 5 of 20 The first item is the Future Park Projects that were part of the LOST referendum that just recently happened last November. We’ll just be giving direction to our staff on where we want to go with it, putting them in the CIPs, and so on. The second item is New Development Boulevard Tree Requirements; we’re looking at a couple things, as we all know, some of our lots are getting smaller, that’s part of what it is these days, and different ways of making sure that if we do plant trees they’re actually going to be able to survive. Thirdly, Modifications to the Issuing of Temporary Certificates of Occupancy (TCO) from our Building Department; there are some things that they want to walk through with us for the future to make sure that housing that comes to Cottage Grove are able to get their TCOs at a stable and quicker pace, I guess is maybe the best way to put it. We do not have a Workshop, Closed to the Public, this evening, so we won’t be adjourning in here, we will be adjourning in the Training Room. Otherwise, everybody have a great Hockey Day, as we talked about, this weekend, and try to stay warm. Take care. 13. WORKSHOPS - OPEN TO PUBLIC - TRAINING ROOM A. Future Park Projects (LOST) Staff Recommendation: Receive information and provide direction on future park projects. Mayor Bailey said this is from the LOST referendum that did not pass, so Director Zac Dockter is going to walk us through this, talk about the different projects, and kind of what we can look at for the future. Director Dockter stated when we started the referendum process, there were projects that were in the CIP before we even developed the Preserve.Play.Prosper plan. So, the Council had said what are the referendum goals, and if it doesn’t go, there are still some things we want to talk about, to see whether there’s a priority component or not, and that’s what tonight’s workshop is intended to do. So, I’m hoping to do less speaking and more listening so I can understand what the Council wants to do with this list of projects. As I go through the slides, I’ll go through it very quickly. There were three handouts that just kind of showed the three projects, with the last Concept Designs, but in front of you is this sheet here that has a list of all the projects, the micro projects and then the higher-level projects. There is also the current Capital Improvements Plan (CIP), so at the end of this maybe you’ll want to say you want to push something up and we’ll talk about the need of whatever it might be. So, these will be your tools to use as we get to the end of the presentation. So, a real quick summary: Hamlet Park is a $17M project, Mississippi Dunes Park is a $13M project, and River Oaks is a $6M project; those were the referendum items. Within each of those, there was a list of micro projects that made up those larger park projects. Hamlet Park •Finishing the softball fields and the two baseball fields and the final parking lot down there. •The park building is $4M, replacing the current athletic football-soccer field, multiuse field; the athletic field is $2M along with the laying. •Replacing the skateboard park into a concrete plaza is $1M. •Splashpad is about $1M. •Enhancing the playground and the whole playground and spot around that, similar to but a slightly smaller scale as Woodridge Park, $6M. •Amphitheater and Art Walk Garden is $1M. •The north trail entrance, by the pond, off of Hadley and 80th Street, $500K, and the distance equivalent would be choreographed. It’s important to remember that there are additional costs for things like escalation and soft costs, and engineering costs. So, if we choose these projects, the full prices could change, depending on how we approach. I also want to mention real quickly, and I’ll break this stuff out in another slide, too, but with potential funding support, we’re looking at all those projects, there’s not a lot of outdoor funding right at our fingertips. There is a Minnesota Outdoor Recreation Grant, which gave us $350K that we were successful in doing for the first two City Council Meeting January 22, 2025 Page 6 of 20 ballfields at Hamlet Park, and I’m pretty confident we could do it for the second two ballfields. It could also be used for things like playgrounds or whatever else, but you could only use it for one of those projects; you could use it for one year, and then maybe a couple years down the road you can make a decision on it. But, again, a competitive grant process is not guaranteed money in the budget, but this is $350K, and based on the ballfield development, as you know, that will be 50% of the project cost. Mississippi Dunes Park •Boat, kayak launch, and fishing pier, $1.7M. •Habitat restoration $500K. •Picnic area, $500K. •Trail system is about $250K. •Parking lot with landscaping features, about $1.5M. •Four-season building with a patio area, $5M. •Grand lawn with a terrace and more of a natural patio by the river, $1.5M. •Nature-based playground, $1M. •Outdoor classroom is close to $2M. Essential Funding: We believe that the building and park amenities are going to be a perfect fit for the 3M Priority 2 Settlement Funds, so we’re going to go aggressively for that; I mentioned that at our meeting with the legislators as well. We think we can hopefully get at least 50% of the project on that, so about $6M is vetted, which leaves us $20M to be spread out, but we’re at the heart of that damage. So, I’m hoping that they’ll be very supportive of that type of funding and it meets all of our goals for that project. Habitat Restoration: We’ve been successful in that over and over, so $150K, which would be about 70%-80% of those projects, and those are pretty common. We’re being pretty aggressive with that so far, and we’ve been working with the South Washington County Watershed District as well, so it could be 100% there. Playgrounds, trails, and interpretive areas: The DNR Outdoor Recreation Grant is giving us $50K, about 30% of that funding. Boat launch, kayak, and fishing pier: We think we can get by with about $500K, working with the Minnesota DNR Fisheries. River Oaks Golf Course & Event Center I don’t want to get too far into details because I think we’ll talk more about this when we get to the workshop when we talk about our Annual Planning and the Business Plan. Just real quick, the plans for the micro projects in there were: •Building Enhancements, Simulator, $3M. •Patio Upgrades, $1M. •Driving Green Enhancements, $1M. •Inlay and putting green, $500K. •Winter Zone and Biking Trail, $500K. In terms of funding for it, there’s not a lot out there, at least at my fingertips, but we do have the Minnesota DNR Regional Trail Grant, which I’ve acquired several times in my career. My only concern with that is that the grant requires four-season use; I’m a little bit concerned about how that would work with River Oaks during the golf season, whereas this would be filed for use primarily in the winter. So, we can still go that route, but maybe that $300K was a commitment here, and maybe we will get a different spot for that than down at River Oaks; that was the conversation that we’d had at that time. Director Dockter asked if there were any questions on the alternative funding sources; otherwise, I’m probably not going to go back to that. Mayor Bailey asked if Council had any questions on that: Council Member Thiede asked if Director Dockter was ready for general questions. Director Dockter replied just on the alternative funding sources, and then I’ll go onto the others. Director Dockter said I provided a list of the micro projects in front of you, and I also provided the CIP, which is up here on the screen, and I’ll leave that slide up. My question to the Council is which projects do you still want to City Council Meeting January 22, 2025 Page 7 of 20 pursue to keep in the CIP; you can decide on where they want to go in the CIP or maybe we still want to do the project, but it’s not even in the CIP, maybe it’s longer than seven years out or whatever it is. I wanted to give you an option of moving these projects if you feel like it. I do want to say that some of these 2025 projects are already in the queue, and we’ve done service agreements on them, too, but for the most part, several of these can be moved. Everything in 2026 and 2027 can be adjusted. With that, I will take questions. Mayor Bailey said I’ll start with Council Member Thiede and then I’ll move across the room. Council Member Thiede said in my opinion, like up here and so forth, Mississippi Dunes is kind of a no brainer. That’ll make that essentially functional and get people to the water and everything, and we’re pretty well covered by a grant if we get the grant. Just a question, what did the first two ballparks at Hamlet cost? Director Dockter replied they were I want to say $3.5M, and then the building was $600K. Council Member Thiede said and these two are $6M because? Director Dockter replied well, one is escalation, and then escalation from when we built those fields to now; but then it’s also we get, remember when we did these estimates, we were building an escalation for those projects, too, so we were anticipating 2026, 2027 construction, as well as the soft costs are in there, too. Council Member Thiede said so now the ballfields, though, the thing is there’s the concept of yeah, you want amenities for the public, but certain things will generate revenue, right? Director Dockter replied correct. Council Member Thiede asked so, you know, probably the ballfields, those would generate revenue? Director Dockter replied some revenue. Council Member Thiede asked or not necessarily? Director Dockter replied it’ll never even pay for itself, but it’ll generate some revenue from that. Council Member Thiede said okay. Director Dockter said but there’s this process that I’m comfortable that those numbers are probably conservative today, and we all know how they can change quickly, right? So, every year it seems to change quickly, and we won’t be constructing any of this stuff until 2025, 2026. I’m comfortable with the numbers today. Council Member Olsen asked Director Dockter on his CIP document here, I’m assuming that the color coding coincides with the funding sources, is that right? Director Dockter replied correct, yes. Council Member Olsen said so, something that I’m curious about is, and I’m sure you won’t have the answer to that this evening, if you were to look at all of these items and prioritize them, how would you do that? What would you and your team perceive to be the highest priority items? Because obviously with the fact that the Local Option Sales Tax referendum did not pass, we’re in a pretty tough spot, and a number of these things are simply not feasible, they just aren’t. So, I think there are several ways to sort it; one way is well, okay, if we’ve got funding for it, we can move forward. You mentioned that we’ve already signed some agreements on different projects and things, but as you look at the whole picture and you have to put your eggs in various baskets, I’d be curious what baskets you would put them in; for example, if you feel like Hamlet Park is a greater priority than River Oaks, or is Mississippi Dunes a greater priority than Hamlet? Because that’s what we’re going to have to do; the bottom line is we’re going to have to pick and choose and you’re the expert. You and your people do this for a living every day and I have a lot of faith in your analysis, your opinion, etc. So, if that’s a today conversation, great, I assume it’s not, but as we work through this process, heading into our budget dialogue, it might be something to think about. Director Dockter replied I can give you pieces on some of that stuff that was on the LOST. Council Member Olsen replied, yes, please do, I would love it. Director Dockter said so real quick, on these, I mean, you need to make your moves. As you can see at the top, no bill gets you very far, right? Council Member Olsen replied right. Director Dockter said so, but there are things like sports lighting, you can push it farther away. I mean, they’re aging systems, and many have to be replaced, but they can certainly be pushed out. Here’s my, like the hockey rink boards, but again, I think all of these in pink are Park Improvement Funds; they’re typically pretty important upgrades that the neighborhoods have asked for, the community has asked for that we needed to split, and they’re relatively low in cost and then or they’re things that just need to be replaced because they’re aging out. But there’s not a ton of movement in there, but certainly, and even the Park Trust Fund, that gets difficult, right? So, if you’re putting up a new park in a neighborhood that’s probably developed, that’s been waiting for a park, we try to build one of these. So, I’ll just say that, but again, City Council Meeting January 22, 2025 Page 8 of 20 everything can be moved; basically, everything can be re-prioritized, so I don’t want to take that away. With River Oaks, I think everything gets put on the final page, everything gets put on the back burner. The Dunes, I think we go aggressively at the 3M Settlement, I think we get the boat launch and the kayak launch, and we can get back that access to the water if we take care of the trails. We can get those things so that people can use the park, right? That’s what we purchased it for, and I think we go aggressively and see how much we can get to do that, and then deal with the rest of the things, whatever the remaining things are, we can deal with that later. Hamlet Park: I would say my number one concern is the skateboard park; it’s just that I think I put that in originally in 2004. Its aged out. Council Member Olsen said yeah, and it definitely has, you can see it. Director Dockter said now the great thing is, the surface needs to be replaced, but actually those boards can be refurbished because basically there’s a frame underneath, and you can spend $100K and you can do quite a bit of work. And I’m learning that concrete skateboard parks are actually starting to not get too trendy now since people are getting bored with them. I think it’s coming back to what we have, to engage the system we have, so we could probably spend $100K or $200K, because $100K is just for the surface; we could probably spend $200K there, and add to it, refurbish it, fix it, replace the surface, and make a great skateboard park that people would love. So, that would be my number one priority. I think the synthetic fields, in my opinion, the Athletic Association has had two opportunities at that, it didn’t work, so, I think we put that to rest. The park building we are going to have to address at some point, but that doesn’t have to be a today conversation, I think I can keep things on there; so, these are all my opinions, remember. Council Member Olsen said right, and that’s what I asked for, though. Director Dockter said the splashpad, I don’t think that’s worth doing because of the cost. Enhanced playground, at some point we’ll have to deal with that playground, I don’t know if that’s a today conversation because its still a great playground that’s there. People aren’t asking for another Woodridge. Council Member Olsen asked when did we replace that equipment last? Director Dockter replied so the original equipment was in 2004 or 2005. Council Member Olsen said yeah, but we upgraded once. Director Dockter said we renovated it in like 2017 or 2018; some of the original, most of it is the original system, then we added to it and/or replaced, because the concrete sidewalk around it has picnic areas. We really added a lot to it, it’s still good today, but some of the equipment is 20 years old. That one probably needs to get in the CIP somewhere. Council Member Thiede asked with the skateboard park, is there any chances for like sponsorship, like it could be somebody so the skateboard park that they have naming rights, right, and have a deal? Council Member Garza said that’s a big business out there. Council Member Olsen said I think the Dave Thiede Skateboard Park sounds good, I think its perfect, I really do. Council Member Thiede replied I do have an opportunity, mabe. Council Member Olsen replied well, but you need a battery on your car, so, let’s not get crazy. Director Dockter said one thing I should mention with the Hamlet Skateboard Park is I think you may recall, probably don’t, but in one workshop, whether this goes or not, we need to replace the surface there, as its all cracking up. So, we already have $100K in the CIP; now, it’s just a matter of whether the Council wants to add to this and fix up the equipment. At least we have a start there that’s budgeted. The softball fields completion I kind of struggle with because its an uncomplete product, it feels like an uncomplete product at the moment. But, again, the Athletic Association had the opportunity to approve the referendum on that one twice, so, I don't know that that’s the highest priority at this moment. Council Member Olsen said well, and I think we wall have to envision that that could really be a destination for larger tournaments and things of that nature, but at the end of the day, if we can’t afford it, which we can’t, it probably needs to wait. But some of the other things that you’re prioritizing I think make a lot of sense, both just in terms of our fiscal ability to get those things done, but also the larger benefit to the community. So, that’s kind of why I asked is because I’m sure you played with the Rubik’s Cube in your brain a million times, and you’re going to have much more of a handle on this than we are. Director Dockter asked what do you guys hear? And you don’t hear people asking for the ballfields, and I understand and I get it. But how do I prioritize two baseball fields over Mississippi Dunes or over the Still Ponds City Council Meeting January 22, 2025 Page 9 of 20 Park, or the new Wolterstorff trail? That gets to be the hard part. So, I think we wait and see if I can close the issue, they probably need to come to us, right, at some point? Then we can have that conversation. Council Member Olsen said so, then what I think I hear you saying is go hard after 3M Settlement money for Mississippi Dunes, get that park moving. We may not be able to fully complete it, but we’ll get the necessary elements in place, right? Invest a little bit into some of the more feasible elements of what we had for Hamlet, and then we just keep our powder dry on River Oaks until we can figure out some different funding for that stuff. Does that sound about right, did I get it right? Director Dockter replied agreed, and the only thing I’ll add is remember, we’re still developing parks all across the community while this is happening; there is more development, 100%. Council Member Olsen said from my chair, which is 20%, it makes sense to me; so, I appreciate your feedback on that. Thank you. Council Member Clausen said I’m coming into this later, and I beg your pardon while I ask these questions, but I don’t know the answers. How does the Athletic Association, and you talked about them and how they need to do something; how do they relate to the softball fields, what is their role? Council Member Olsen said that’s a great question. Director Dockter replied they’ll be the primary user, but they also have, in terms of funding, they have charitable gambling, so they have opportunities to secure funds. They’re willing contributors, and they’ve done a lot for our parks here, all along, there have been millions that they have put into our department. It’s all good, but they’re the primary users, so they’re the ones that we have to work with to make sure that the field is being used; we don’t want them to build a skatepark to be used, right? Especially here. Otherwise, I think they’ve got tens of thousands of fans that are impacted by this, so, we need to hear from them. I think that was part of the frustration with the referendum is we never got the Athletic Association to really get on board with it, and I get it, they’re all volunteers. I don’t expect anything, but when we’re trying to do things like that, and we’re trying to, if the vote doesn’t go through like it did over here, so now we need to hear from them to make that a higher priority. Does that make sense? Council Member Clausen replied thank you. Mayor Bailey asked Council Member Garza if she had anything to add on this one, but she did not. Mayor Bailey told Director Dockter on my take, I do think, the first thing, everything in 2025 stays. I think we’re, it’s pretty vague. The only one, to your point as it relates to the Athletic Association, in my opinion, for 2026 might be the $355K for the lighting; because if there is anything, I think we should go to that organization and have a conversation about because it benefits them more than it benefits us. That would be one that I would have a conversation with them about with the lighting, because that would then free up some opportunities for some of this other stuff that we’re looking at, as we look to 2026. At the same time, and the reason I’m throwing that one out there specifically is because I want you guys to go after the grants and yes, the 3M Settlement money; I mean, it is more than $20M now because its been collecting interest, I don’t exactly know the new number, but I heard it was north of $30M. Director Dockter said good. Mayor Bailey said, so, there’s more money in there than I think we’re, I just don’t want you to cut us short, right? Director Dockter replied, well, I’m going for the whole thing. Mayor Bailey said I think you should. Director Dockter said we are going for the whole thing. Mayor Bailey said and I think we should, and then if we have to supplement with going after other DNR grants or things like that, that’s great. And if the DNR is able to provide us with the $900K, that is one less thing we have to worry about, or then maybe we figure something else on our list that we want to put our focus on. Mayor Bailey said on the skateboard park, I think at the moment, I think next year you do the asphalt or whatever and let’s see how things kind of wash out with some of your grant opportunities; and not even just for the skateboard park, I’m just saying at this point, the surface is bad, and one way or the other, we have to do the City Council Meeting January 22, 2025 Page 10 of 20 surface. The rest of the stuff, I guess we’ll have to wait and see, and we did naming rights at the Ice Arena, which helped us, so that might be something we want to look at, if somebody might be interested in that. Council Member Olsen asked is that surface a subcontracted project, or would we try to do that ourselves? Director Dockter replied no, I think we’d go to a concrete surface, so I wouldn’t want to try to do that. Council Member Garza said and we already have $100K in the budget, already allotted to that. So, we’re looking to improve it, and you don’t know what that number is that you would need additionally to that $100K? Director Dockter asked for the equipment? Council Member Garza replied yes. Director Dockter said well, going back in time, we were going to replace that just about ten years ago, and then we worked with the Council, and said actually, the equipment’s not in bad shape if you spend $10K each year to maintain it or replace any bad surfacing, touching anything up, and then add in a new feature every year; that worked out great. So, you can do that, or you can spend $10K-$15K a year and just kind of continue it every year if you can keep it up and you add to it, or you can kind of spend $100K at one time and then get it done. So, there’s a couple different options to it; I think sometimes there’s some benefit to doing it a little bit over time because then they see that’s it being continually upgraded, some people really appreciate that, at least they did last time. So, those are a couple options, but the focus is on the surface right now. I would say maybe we up that to $115K for the first year, replace the surface, while we’re there let’s fix up the equipment and at least get it back into its original shape, maybe add one small feature. We have a really great group to work with, and then after we do that, we could get the skateboard community together and start talking about okay, we’re going to keep this equipment, but what else can we do to make it better? And then maybe that’s when we come up with a plan. Council Member Garza asked are you working with the people that did the skateboard park up on Meadow Grass? Council Member Olsen asked, do you mean the Bike Park? Council Member Garza said, oh, that’s a Bike Park. Council Member Olsen said yes, that’s a different group. Director Dockter said well, funny enough, that gentleman also has a skateboard group, so he would help me get the youth involved with the process; so, he’s actually helped me quite a bit with that. Mayor Bailey asked is that still Chan? Director Dockter replied Chan, yes, but he’s been pretty good at grabbing skateboarders and bikers together, and we just kind of thought we could use his design team. Council Member Olsen said he’s still trying to raise money for improvements to the Bike Park, too. Mayor Bailey said so, that’s my take, and I think as, let’s say you come back to us and you say hey, you know what? There’s a grant available for an amphitheater, I’m just picking something off the list, or Art Walk Garden or whatever, for $250K; if I get that, that means we’ve got to come up with the other $250K, right? And, so, that’s why I’m saying if you look at some of these, the smaller numbers aren’t going to do anything for us; and then, of course, Council at budget time, looking at CIPs and such for the future, can also take a look at what makes sense, right? But that’s why I specifically talked about the sports lighting; and frankly, maybe we do sit down with the Athletic Association regarding those other two ballfields. Director Dockter said yes, I plan to; well, first, I wanted to hear what the Council had to say. Mayor Bailey said I mean, yes, it benefits our citizens and the families and so on, but the fact of the matter is it would be nice to get that park finally finished; it’s been going on for 20, 30, 40 years now, it’d be nice to finally see it finished. Council Member Thiede said another thought just popped into my head, but like the lighting at some of the sports fields and such, you know, right now it may be cooling off for sales, but like Xcel or something like that, it would definitely soar; could actually some of that lighting be powered by solar, and is there any type of grants or rebates or anything like that, that Xcel or someone could provide, to help fund some of that? Director Dockter replied so, I’ve actually been studying this and met with several people at the trade shows I was at, solar is coming a long way, right? They’re actually doing like streetlights now, which are very big things in a year, so they’ve really found a way to design for that. I don’t think they’re quite into sports lighting yet, just because there’s so many things, but it can’t be very far out. So, I’ll dig into it more and see what our options are. Mayor Bailey asked Director Dockter does that give you some guidance then? City Council Meeting January 22, 2025 Page 11 of 20 Director Dockter replied yeah, I guess the only thing is, was there anything on there that you just said no, to take it off there? I don't think I heard anything, and we’ll talk about River Oaks later, but is there anything on here where we don’t want to talk about it or anything? Mayor Bailey replied no, I think the only one on here that I would say, and it’s really up to you, Zac, when I was at the Athletic Association meeting, there were more nos about synthetic fields than yeses. So, I mean, if you personally wanted to take that off, I would have zero concern about it on that particular item, just because I hear it, and I know Jim Fohrman and crew, they were not keen on it, at least that’s what I understood. Council Member Olsen said well, I don’t like synthetic, I mean, its a lot; and what you did with the Ice Arena, in terms of putting down the field turf and stuff, and then we use that, I think, that way. Mayor Bailey said yeah, so, if you’re looking at this list, I would say the synthetic fields can come off; I would leave the rest for now. I mean, the splashpad, we need to take that one off, too. Council Member Olsen said yeah, I don’t think that’s really a thing. Director Dockter said there, there, and anything on the bottom is we’re kind of waiting for an opportunity? Mayor Bailey replied I think waiting for an opportunity because I like what the look and what you’re trying to do. We do hear from our Arts Committee group in the community who wants to do something with like an amphitheater, etc. in the future, so, there might be some opportunity there; so, I wouldn’t take that off the list. And River Oaks would be, like you said, we’ll figure that out when we get into the Business Planning for River Oaks. Council Member Olsen said, yeah, we’ll do that update with Dennis. Director Dockter said thank you for your direction, I appreciate it. Mayor Bailey said you got it, thanks, Zac. Council Member Olsen asked Administrator Levitt does that fill in the blanks for you? Administrator Levitt replied absolutely, we just needed to make sure if there was anything that you deleted from 2025, or in 2026, that we could do that. So, we have that direction. Council Member Olsen asked Brenda, does that make sense? Director Malinowski replied yes. Mayor Bailey said that way you’re not having to do plug this hole with that hole, at least for 2025; 2026, maybe not. Council Member Olsen said largely, we’re in a holding pattern. Mayor Bailey said all right, and asked if Council had any other questions on that one; there were none. B. New Development Boulevard Tree Requirements Staff Recommendation: Approve the removal of boulevard trees adjacent to homes in new developments and allow staff to begin the process of updating City Ordinances to reflect this change. Mayor Bailey said we’ll move to 13B, which is New Development Boulevard Tree Requirements, and Ryan Burfeind, Public Works Director, will kick this off. Director Burfeind said Gary Orloff, our Streets Superintendent, and our City Forester, Nate Heilman, are here if there are any maintenance-specific questions, we’ll talk about those as well. Director Burfeind said we had this initial discussion with Council in July, 2024, when we had our Public Works Workshop. We talked about a lot of these topics, some of the issues we were seeing. Council gave us direction and additional things we should look into; we’ve done that, we intended to bring it back a little sooner, but we had a windstorm and we had all the fallout from the windstorm, and we had another workshop on the windstorm, so it just delayed bringing this back to Council. So, that’s what we’re here to discuss tonight. Just a reminder, right now, we have about 14,500 boulevard trees in our existing inventory in the City Right-of- Way that we do maintain, and those are not the ones that we’re worried about tonight; those are trees that we already have in our Right-of-Way. I do feel strongly, even though some cities do it differently, that we should be maintaining those, there’s a liability with them and it is on our Right-of-Way, that we should maintain. City Council Meeting January 22, 2025 Page 12 of 20 So, this is more about the new developments and all those challenges that we’re seeing, but also new developments are growing our tree inventory and increasing our budget. On the bottom, you can see those three items that I kind of kicked off back in July, the budgetary challenges, and then really the other two main ones are more of a feasibility standpoint with the reduced lot size and the overall setbacks for the front yard. So, we’re really kind of pinching that area that we have for trees in the front yard and the boulevard, and then interference with our infrastructure as well. Looking back, we’ve had some significant increases in the past ten years; we have had several budget additions over the years related to the Forestry budget. Just this last budget cycle, Council approved additional for our EAB treatment as we keep up on a three-year cycle. We actually switched to a six-year tree-trimming program, instead of five. Even with that, we still had a $50K budget add just to maintain that; six is about as far as we’re comfortable pushing that, working with our current forester and our management analyst, who is our former City forester, really with the trees that we’re maintaining, we should keep it no more than a six-year cycle. One way that we’ve mitigated budget adds over the years is we had a much bigger program, and we were removing hundreds, if not thousands, of Ash trees in a year; we had a much bigger program and expense to cover that, anywhere from $130K to $200K. As we’ve gotten down to our desired goal of about 1,500 Ash trees, we’ve been moving those funds with each budget from Ash tree removal to maintenance; so, that’s allowed us to minimize the budget add. So, that funding source has really been tapped out, we’ve just kind of moved all those over to tree trimming and tree removal, so you will start to see more budget adds in the future years as we kind of move those funds over. Just on the budget as a whole, you can see on the right what makes up the budget, all the different items, $614K is our 2025 budget. I did want to do a little bit of a comparison for some other Public Works budgets that are kind of similar in the sense that there hasn’t been big changes in the programs and how we do business differently; it’s just frankly Forestry, Snowplowing, Signs, as the cities grow, those programs have grown, and we’re trying to maintain a similar level of service. You can see Forestry really stands out, a 90% increase over ten years, and that’s with switching to a six-year trimming cycle instead of five. So, a little bit of an actually reduced level of service and still a 90% increase. Snowplowing is 65%, and Street Signs is a great comparison, of course, as we develop, we add streets, we add signs, and we’re only at 32% over that ten-year period. Some of the big changes, the contracted maintenance costs has been the big one, and even with revising to that six-year trimming cycle, it’s been a big impact. Trimming costs are up over 500% in the ten-year period and then 90% for tree planting. Just for a comparison, at our current number of trees in our current budget, we’re about $42 per boulevard tree per year; so, with the new developments if we’re adding around 500 trees a year, you have about $20K just in the new trees, let alone inflation and all the other costs that go into it. What we have here is a table comparing the exact same area, so it’s ten years apart, and the same area of tree trimming, and in the winter of 2014 to 2015, it cost $31K; this year, if we had to switch to a six-year cycle, we’re at $210K. Council Member Thiede asked is that cost per tree solely contracting somebody to do it? Director Burfeind replied that is, yes. So, these are all trees greater than 8”, so we trim up to 8” trees; we have the training, the staff, and really the equipment to do trees up to 8”. When they start getting bigger, we need cranes and different types of equipment that we just don’t have. So, yes, that cost per tree, that’s really your cost of inflation, right? That’s the actual bid prices, and we get multiple bids from many vendors throughout the metro to try to get the best cost that we can. The quantity of trees also has gone up, not because we added more trees, but because more trees grew from the under 8” category to the over 8” category; so, they went from a City- trimmed tree to a contractor-trimmed tree. The other big reason the costs went up, if you look at ten years ago, most of the trees were in the 8”-to-15”, now most of the trees are in the 16”-to-20”, in this category. So, the trees are growing, but it’s the budget, that’s not being hit by inflation, it’s hit by the actual tree growth. So, our roads don’t get wider, we don’t have wider roads to plow each year; if anything, the roads are getting narrower. This is actually growing exponentially for those reasons, and that’s why we see that over 500% cost increase. Now, I’m getting on board with the practical side; that’s the budget side, right? And if there’s a desire for the boulevard trees, with the right budget we will maintain those trees and we will do that task. The other issue is more of a feasibility we’ve been seeing, and this has been kind of creeping up the past few years. You can see City Council Meeting January 22, 2025 Page 13 of 20 changes in lot sizes and setbacks since 2000 to present; obviously, in the present case, not all lots are 42’ wide, but we see a lot in the 40’, 45’, and 50’ lots these days. The 50’ lots are considered like a standard single-family lot, not 85’, what a wide lot used to be, and the setbacks as low as 20’, so that distance from the garage to the sidewalk is that much narrower. This is from Settlers Bluff, and we’re seeing a lot of this now where our streetlights, our hydrants, our different utility infrastructure that goes on the lot line. We used to have 55’-to-60’ in that space to plant a boulevard tree, and now we’re down to, in this case, about 20’; you can see the impact that a big tree like that will have over time. We had already made a switch to go to every other lot with boulevard trees a couple years ago. Even with that, we’re still running into cases by doing every other lot, we’re running into trees right by hydrants, the curb boxes obviously are very close to these trees. We’re seeing an issue that’s been created with that. So, like we talked about at that budget workshop, really our request for consideration and a recommendation is to no longer require the boulevard tree, just adjacent to new residential lots; rather, we would require a front-yard tree. One of the discussions at the budget workshop was are we shifting costs for residents that didn’t use to have a front-yard tree and now they do. One thing I want to make mention is up until lots got so small, it was pretty standard to have a boulevard tree and a front-yard tree. So, we’re not kind of increasing that maintenance cost to the homeowners, we just reached the point where we don’t have room for both. We used to have maybe a boulevard tree on one side of the driveway and a front-yard tree on the other, and we just don’t have that room anymore. So, when we say a front-yard tree requirement, it would be a change to the Code to make sure developers are always planting one front-yard tree so we have a uniform wooded streetscape. Another thing that I’ll talk a little more on the next screen is when lots are 50’ or less, we still have a concern, even if it’s a front-yard tree with that canopy size. We do want to get height, and little crabapple trees and little magnolias aren’t going to give a streetscape; we want 34’-to-50’ tall trees, so actually our forester did some great work and developed a list of good potential front-yard trees in these smaller lots that will still give a nice height to the forest in the area. Obviously, major roadways, commercial areas, and neighborhood collector streets, like Mississippi Dunes Boulevard, that don’t have home frontage, we would still plant boulevard trees that the City would maintain; we want to make sure that we have a consistent, kind of wooded feel throughout our town. So, we would continue to plant those along the boulevards. Another question that came up at the budget workshop was do we have this in other communities? This is a map that we also had and we had some discussion; the areas in yellow are areas that for one reason or another over the years boulevard trees were not required in those developments. So, this isn’t something new, we did have many areas that did not have boulevard trees in the past, so we’re kind of going back to that trend. These were all bigger lots, and there are probably different reasons for not having boulevard trees, but those are the areas that exist today. These are small-stature trees we’re going to call them, so if a lot is 50’ or less, we would look at this type of tree planted in the front yard. You can see some of them, we’ll whittle it down, some of these crabapples, 25’, are maybe not quite the height we’re looking for, but a lot of 30’, 40’, even 50’ tall trees, but the spread gets no more than 30’; so, you can still have a nice height of those trees in the neighborhood, but they aren’t going to spread out and touch the neighbor’s house, hang over the street, and cause all the other issues. Another question that we talked about a little bit, and we got some more feedback from additional cities since our budget workshop, with what are some similar cities doing. We wanted to look at developing cities with that suburban feel, so these are five cities that are managing that, that we spoke to; we wanted to get a feel for what are they requiring and what are their reasons for doing that. Rosemount: They do not do boulevard trees anymore, but yard trees are required on each lot. Woodbury: Is one out of these five that still does require boulevard trees, but they assign the maintenance to the homeowner or the HOA. For me, that’s not something that I’m super comfortable with because like I said, there’s liability with these trees and it has an impact to the public; I would not want that on the homeowners. We do ask them to mow the grass, but the grass can’t fall over and injure or kill somebody. So, it’s very different for me for a boulevard tree. Apple Valley: Doesn’t do boulevard trees or actually in the utility easements; that’s the first 10’ of the yard behind the sidewalks, they don’t allow it there either. They’re not comfortable with them in that location. Inver Grove Heights: Does not allow trees in the Right-of-Way in new developments. Savage: Requires two trees per lot, but they do require them on private property. City Council Meeting January 22, 2025 Page 14 of 20 So, you are seeing more cities go this way, and they’re voicing similar concerns: Lot sizes, setbacks, costs, and just trying to make sure we can fit trees in the right location. This is a picture that I showed at the workshop, but I wanted to show it again because I think that it does a really nice job of showing that even without the boulevard trees specifically, I think there’s a really similar feel to the neighborhoods. This is in Mississippi Dunes Estates, this is not a boulevard tree. This is an area of Timber Ridge, some of Timber Ridge doesn’t have boulevard trees, but this is an area of the Timber Ridge neighborhood that does; with this picture, it’s a similar-age neighborhood, similar tree heights, I think it’s a very similar feel, that we’re going to have that wooded tree streetscape. The other thing with the development tree requirements in the new lots, I was talking to Emily, right now with the above 60’-wide lots, there are three private trees, and if it’s below 60’, there are two. I think now if there’s not a boulevard tree, we can probably change that a little bit. We don’t want to reduce the overall trees in the neighborhood, but I think maybe 70’ on up would be four, and maybe 50’-to-60’, to 65’, would be three, 40’-to-50’ would be two. So, we’d want to keep a similar number of trees in the neighborhood, just in a more appropriate location, rather than the boulevards. Director Burfeind said with that, there’s a staff recommendation, and I’ll be happy to answer any questions. Mayor Bailey said just a quick question from me, just to refresh my memory, boulevard trees are generally paid for by the developer, correct? Director Burfeind replied yes. Mayor Bailey said and then we’re just responsible for them after the fact. Director Burfeind replied correct, yes. Mayor Bailey said so, if you’re getting down to these 40’ and 45’ lots, so to speak, are three trees feasible on a lot that size? Director Burfeind replied I think we would stick with two on the 40’-to-50’ lots, and we’d look to have a little more on that 50’+, 70+ range. Mayor Bailey said here’s my only concern; I agree, I don’t think we can increase the trees, but here’s my concern for you: That is, do you then see developers coming in, saying well, I’m not going to build a 55’ lot because I’m going to be required to put four trees on it, or three trees, there’s a cost. Do you know what I’m saying? So, I’m wanting to make sure that we’re not going to force them to push down on lot sizes in order to pay less because they’re going to have less trees. I mean, if the tree prices are what you’re saying, and we’re paying for them, I mean, you’d think their developments times that, we’re going to get a tighter development, I think. So, I just tell you this, however you guys want to do it; personally speaking, I’m totally fine with the direction you’re going and doing away with the boulevard trees, but somehow you have to figure out what that magic number is for those. Or maybe if it’s a lot at 40’ with two trees, maybe there’s, I don't know, I almost want to say an extra fee or something; I’m just worried that we’re going to force developers to go smaller. Do I have reason to be concerned? Administrator Levitt replied mayor and members of the Council, I don’t think we do because really they’re paying the install fee and it’d be like a 2.5”-or-3” caliper tree; so, if it’s $350 or $450, that’s the only thing the developer is paying, right? In the equation, if you change the amount of trees, you’re only talking $500. The other thing is the developer will tell you trees bring value. So, they’re not going to push back at our quantity, and they shouldn’t back out or push back at our development removing the Right-of-Way trees, the boulevard trees. They had to plant it, and they didn’t have any stake in the game, per se, because the homeowners didn’t have to maintain them anyway. So, the quantity of trees is only the original install price of the trees, not any long-term maintenance costs. Mayor Bailey said okay. Director Burfeind said and I think the other thing we could do is we can take, we can look at those numbers and let’s say a real world development, like Prairie Dunes, we could do a comparison if we still require boulevard trees. Because the builder/developer pays for all of the yard trees and the boulevards, so, if we’re just kind of shifting it into the yard. We can make sure there’s a similar quantity, to maybe keep it cost neutral. Mayor Bailey said that’s really what I’m looking for, because on the other side, I just didn’t want housing developers then to start pushing more narrow lots, smaller lots, just for the sake of trying to save money on a 200- home development times two trees; I mean, on a single home, that might be nothing, but it will definitely be something on the grand scheme of things. City Council Meeting January 22, 2025 Page 15 of 20 Director Burfeind said yes, but we can look hard at that and make sure about that overall quantity; and that is our goal, to keep a really similar quantity of trees in the neighborhood and all that stuff. Emily Schmitz, Community Development Director, said and I think it’s important to know when we rewrote our Codes, this is one thing, and this was a conversation, how are we making sure we can handle the market? And so we didn’t reduce the yard trees about a year and a half ago. I can say there was certainly a positive response, realizing that we’re trying to keep that, too. Mayor Bailey said and then I’m going to pop one more question, and it’s mainly more for Emily, but you said it kind of got brought up in this about the commercial side of things. Please, as we look at more commercial developments and the fact I know you said we want to continue to do trees; I’m not saying we shouldn’t, but I also want to be very cognizant of where we put those trees on those commercial nodes. Because plopping a tree when we’ve got a monument sign right there, that’s going to cover the monument sign, makes no sense. And the same with bushes and things like that, that we do in some of these developments, and we have a lot of examples around our community right now that just don’t make any sense. With that, I’m all for the green and the trees, but let’s make sure they’re strategically placed, and if it doesn’t work, it doesn’t work. Council Member Olsen said so, before I ask my questions of staff, I want to ask Council Member Garza, as you buy and sell properties, does this subject come up? Council Member Garza replied it does, all the time. Council Member Olsen said okay, and what are you hearing in terms of? Council Member Garza replied so the subject only comes up on the aged trees; so, when we go and look at homes that are on sale, this conversation is not in new construction, it’s only in resale. And that is a big concern of the buyers that come into buy resold properties that this tree and the roots could possibly cause them some type of headache down the line. So, and that was something, and I’m glad you asked me that, because that came to my mind, I was sitting here wondering if we put one tree in the middle of the yard on a 40’ lot, in 30 years, will that root system cause troubles for that tenant, or? Director Burfeind replied yeah, that’s a good question. I think the general rule of thumb, and we can dig more into it, but those smaller crown trees that we’re looking at, generally will have smaller root systems, similar to that crown size. So, I think that’s where we’d want to keep with those smaller crown trees and not be planting like full size and some of the new Elms that could definitely be an issue. Council Member Garza said and that’s a big deal, so, thank you for that. Council Member Olsen said yeah, and one of the reasons I asked is I learned a lot when Gary and Gavin came to my house to teach me about the fact that I had a front-yard tree and not a boulevard tree, and we needed to replace the tree. And Gavin gave me some amazing advice, this is what you don’t want to do, this is what you do want to do, and it was really all about the species of the tree, how it roots, how it grows, the size; and one of the things he mentioned in that conversation is there’s significant benefit to having an urban forest that provides a degree of protection and shade for your asphalt, on your road, and all that kind of stuff, too. And, so, that’s why communities do it; it’s not just the beautification thing, there’s actually legitimate like benefits to it. But the concern, as Council Member Garza just told us, is what happens with any sort of infrastructure that you might have on a boulevard or whatever, and as those lots get smaller and you showed us the picture, they’re just too close, they just are. I mean, that’s just a fact. So, I mean, I’m all for the idea of moving away from boulevard trees and moving towards more of your front-yard trees and those sorts of things, but I think that comes with a degree of education. And I think we need to work closely with developers to help them understand this is what our goal is, this is what our target is, and if that means that we need to limit the species that they can choose from, then so be it. I think we build that into the Code, meaning it’s not a recommendation, it’s the requirement, it’s one of these, and that’s kind of it, because otherwise, we’re going to set ourself up for trouble. And the last thing any homeowner wants, whether they’re the original homeowner, whether they’re the new buyer, is a surprise in two, three, four, five years, where suddenly they’ve got a root issue that’s messing with something that we have in an easement or something like that, and it becomes their problem. Because those front-yard trees, that’s our deal; City Council Meeting January 22, 2025 Page 16 of 20 that was one of the other things Gavin helped me understand was like, yeah, this is on your dime now. So, he was very good about helping me figure out what to do, but the cost is borne by the homeowner. And I don’t agree with the Woodbury perspective of well, we’re going to require boulevard trees and we’re going to pass the cost onto the homeowner and the HOA. I don’t think that’s the right thing to do, it sounds like you don’t think that either. Director Burfeind said yes, I don’t agree. And from an education perspective, now that Gavin is in the office with me and Zac, I think he’s a great resource to provide the education for our homeowners, developers, whatever it may be. And in the Code, we’ve got it at a minimum; what we want to do is on our smaller lot sizes, we’re going to mandate a maximum spread. We were talking about understory trees as well; a crabapple might be 20’ tall and 19’ wide, so that’s not going to help. So, we’re going to mandate a maximum spread, I want to say 30’, but then a minimum height, so we’re making sure we still have some tall trees with the shade and all the benefits the shade brings. Council Member Olsen said so, we also need to educate and I know I’m preaching to the choir on this, but we need to educate, you know, what does the maintenance look like? How often do you do it? What is a reputable maintenance company vs. trying to do it yourself? Because if you think back to EAB, when Steve Bowe came in front of us, remember, and he was telling us about this is what we’re going to need to do. One of the big challenges we dealt with for the first year and a half or two years is a lot of people thought they had a boulevard tree, and it was going to be our cost, and it wasn’t. There were some mighty upset folks at that point that went, wait a minute, this is going to cost me. So, I just think that education element is going to be really critical. Council Member Garza said I have another question, too. Are we finding or seeing, a lot of our community is old and a lot of our trees are 40, 50, 60 years old. So, I see a lot of times, I do a lot of sewer scopes, and I see a lot of damage to our underground piping, especially to the City pipes. So, I’m wondering, are we starting to see some of that happening to our infrastructure? Director Burfeind replied yeah, we do see more of that. For our City-owned infrastructure, we have a nice sewer preventative program that has largely mitigated that. But as we age, and our trees have aged, we were seeing more of that. That was another discussion with the smaller lots where that front-yard tree might have to be over the sewer, as a boulevard tree would anyway. It’s just looking at the root depth, right, and using trees that don’t have the capacity of a root stem. Council Member Garza said I’ve seen some nasty ones, so that’s why I asked. Council Member Olsen asked are we still slip lining and doing all that? Director Burfeind replied yes, we just, roots forming are the main thing, we have to cycle the slip lining, and that’s our primary thing. We’ve done different slip-lining projects with pavement management when we see damages, but the roots forming in our infrastructure is in our right-of-way. Gary Orloff, Streets Superintendent, said on the street side, what we’re seeing is a lot of sidewalk damage now from these mature trees, so we fixed $80K worth of sidewalks last year; 70% was all from the trees, roots and stuff, so we did that because we had to, for everybody. So, that’s what we’re really seeing now with these big, mature trees; they’re really pushing up sidewalks and curbs, people’s driveways. Council Member Olsen said so there again, the species they choose can mitigate that to some degree, right? Director Burfeind replied yes. Mayor Bailey asked is everybody good on the change? All Council Members indicated they were. Director Burfeind said thank you; Mayor Bailey said all right, thank you, Ryan and Gary. C. Modifications to the Issuing of Temporary Certificates of Occupancy Staff Recommendation: Review and provide direction on the proposed clarification of the TCO process limiting the issuance of a TCO between June 1 and October 1. Issuance of a TCO between June 1 and October 1 requires $8,000 escrow prior to issuance. Mayor Bailey stated Emily is going to take us through this exciting item. City Council Meeting January 22, 2025 Page 17 of 20 Director Schmitz stated thank you for hanging in there for this. We’re going to be talking more about Temporary Certificates of Occupancy (TCOs), what is it? So, we’re going to start at the bare roots, grassroots, so you all understand it. A TCO is issued before a full CO; we offer this opportunity for the process to continue to move forward while some of the items are not complete. Now, I want to be cautious when I say that: It does not mean that there are building life safety items that have not been completed, and we’re letting folks move into this home. Specifically, exterior items, all final building inspection items will have been completed as soon as these exterior items are done. This process started I would say well over a decade ago, and it was started to be sure that we could give communities the processes, especially in the winter months in Minnesota. So, this process allows folks to buy their homes, move into their homes, and hold the builder accountable once they’ve had a chance to finish the needed details. I added a photo of current stock; just honestly, before my time in here, I could have never guessed what in the world that was or why it was here, but truly, it’s important, as we make sure that these homes are ready for occupancy, ultimately to maintain that inspection process. So, what does our existing TCO due process look like? This looks crazy, right, that whole document; it’s not that crazy, but it is time consuming. So, once the final building inspections are complete, but let’s just hypothetically say it’s January, and then we wait until the summer; so, we’re working to make sure that the as-built survey is submitted and reviewed by our Engineering team. This is making sure that the final grades of that lot meets the grading standards and is reviewed and approved; all the water is going to go where we agreed that it should go. Let’s say it’s approved; the builder or developer can go ahead and put their sod in and their boulevard tree. Once those items are installed, they send staff a request and say, hey, I’ve got these items done, can you come out and inspect? And we’re, absolutely, as this means the work is completed. But if we go out there and find that neither the sod or the boulevard tree are not completed, they fail, and we go back and we start all over. A lot of times what’s happening is we say, hey, we were out there, the sod wasn’t installed, let us know once it is, and a lot of times that communication is then dropped. We’ve put the ball back in their court, and we’re not hearing back. So, again, that continues the process. Now, hypothetically, we get through this entire process, we get the sod in and the boulevard tree, the curb stop’s been inspected, its keyable, it works, the whole nine yards. We do eventually issue that final CO, but this process can certainly take some time, depending on if there are problems on that road before they’re resolved. So, why am I standing here, having this conversation with you? These numbers really tell it all. We’ve got some awesome staff who are hands on in this process, and they’ve raised their hands and they’ve said, hey, this isn’t working, this isn’t efficient; how can we look at this and be better? What this is showing, in 2024, and this is by builder or developer, how many TCOs did we issue in 2024, between the months of, I believe warmer months, between May and the end of September? Astonishingly, for each of these developments, well above 50% of the TCOs that we’ve been issuing, we’ve been issuing in months for all of these items that I just talked about (boulevard trees, sod, curb box inspections, canopy stuff); the weather is not impacting their ability to get those things completed. So, a big red flag, and what was our takeaway? About 40% of the time those TCOs are being issued between April and November. So, how do we look at this differently to limit the TCOs in those months? I think the biggest thing is referencing there’s no cost recovery for that process; so, when we go back in this timeline, as we continue to jump back and forth on this timeline, send reminders, follow ups, hey, you still have it out there, we aren’t getting any cost recovery and there’s no fee associated with it. We do hold the escrow to make sure that process is going, but this process does take a lot of staff time. So, communication is one of the safest things. Obviously, our builders have become accustomed, we’ve helped, we’ve supported them through some ups and downs in the market. We always wanted to be a community that was willing to support our builders and developers, which we have been. I think now we’re at a point where we can say, listen, between May and September, these exterior items can be done. However, we still offer this opportunity to you between October and May of the following year. There are several ways that we’re going to communicate this out to these builders: Every year we do try to gather our builders together, checking, looking into different ways with staff, and builders, here are some things as a reminder from a staff perspective to help this process flow smoothly. We have really good conversations, so that’s planned for March. City Council Meeting January 22, 2025 Page 18 of 20 We’ll work on a Draft Policy, which I want to be clear we’ve never had; so, this Policy is really going to help us have some guidelines, as well as standards, that we can follow and really help to educate the builders that this is the standards you need to meet. And then, finally, we are going to include some language in our Development Agreement (DA) moving forward. Those that are out there are staying the way that they are, we aren’t changing those. Moving forward, we want to make sure that it is clear in those DAs, as early in the process as we can that yes, a TCO is an option between the months of October and May; in those warmer months, they still are an option, however, we will require an additional $8K escrow fee submitted during those warmer months as better protection for us, as a City. You’re telling us you’re truly going to get this done in a timely manner, and we have to stay on top of this. So, again, what we’re ultimately proposing is to say TCOs will be issued all year round; however, if you need one between the months of May and October, an additional $8K escrow is required. We’ll be changing that. Director Schmitz asked if there were any questions; Mayor Bailey replied let’s start with Council Member Olsen, but I have a couple, too. Council Member Olsen said so, I know we’ve done TCOs since, well, we’ve been doing them forever. I know that to your point, in the winter months, it’s a very useful tool. That data that you provided, with respect to the number of TCOs in the warmer months, is certainly, I don't know if concerning is the word but interesting. So, here’s my question: Did we ask why? Director Schmitz replied we have had conversations specifically with one builder for a certain situation, and what we’ve recognized is the City’s making it easy, and we’ve been complacent as staff to let them continue that process. When we went out and had conversations with other communities, TCOs are options, but they certainly try to stay away from them, especially in the summer months. So, I would say of the communities we had conversations with, we are the most complacent. Council Member Olsen said so, in my experience, which is not nearly to the degree you guys have, TCOs are much more common in the commercial developments than they are in residential developments. The reason I asked you the question, did we ask why, is because I’d like to know if there’s a legitimate reason behind why a TCO may make sense; the example that was running through my brain is we’re in 2025, but it just seems like yesterday we were dealing with COVID. One of the things that that did is it put the supply chain into absolute pandemonium, and so, it’s entirely possible that somebody would be in a position where they’re asking for a TCO due to a delay in delivery of supplies or materials of nonessential items. Like you mentioned, we’re not talking about life safety or anything like that. To me, that would be a legitimate reason. I also think it’s true, as we all know from our experience with builders and developers, that sometimes they like to take the path of least resistance, that is the least expensive. When you put dollars and cents, like you’re suggesting, behind one of their decision points, they may make a different decision. So, I don’t disagree with that at all. But I just don’t want to be penalizing somebody if they have a truly legitimate concern; you know, your building specs called for Widget A vs. Widget B, and Widget A is on backorder for the next three months. Do you follow me? Director Schmitz replied, I do, I do, and I think that’s why an escrow is glued to a TCO. This isn’t something we’re going to keep. Council Member Olsen replied right, they’ll recapture that if they meet the timeline requirements. Director Schmitz they’ll recapture it, but we want you to prove to us that things are getting done. Council Member Olsen said and look, it is entirely legitimate that we have a concern about not being able to capture revenue for that additional inspection time, that additional administrative time, as those things all cost money. It’s like when people make a public data request, that’s not free, it’s not free, right? We have people who have to find stuff and copy stuff, and there’s a cost to all of that. But I just, again, I just want to make sure that weren’t not being punitive in situations where we really maybe shouldn’t be. Does that make sense, am I saying that right, Jennifer? Administrator Levitt replied yes. Mayor and Council, you kind of asked what’s driving it, so I’ll give you my two cents. Obviously, labor and management is not very good in regards to building trades, right? Because the superintendent has to be able to program out, if they have a closing on July 1st, they have to speculate and coordinate when the tree’s going to get installed and when the sod’s going to get laid. City Council Meeting January 22, 2025 Page 19 of 20 Council Member Olsen said yeah, because they have different groups that are coming in to do that work. Administrator Levitt replied correct. So, if you think about it, so, they’re not, that’s one factor and they’re obviously just coordinating with the closing date. So, one of the other things is, let’s think about this as a builder, you have 20 lots, and you close on those 20 lots in May, June, and July; you’ve got the cash and haven’t sodded those lots, but you’re going to sod them all in August. And, so, it’s cheaper for you to do it, you’re going to sod 20 lots all on the same day. I think maybe one neighborhood has probably experienced that, right, where you receive the sod, and the company is just coming in and laying sod on all 20 lots. It’s more cost effective, right? But now let’s think about those homeowners that were in those 19 other homes; they had dirt lawns all summer because they were not motivated to sod those lots individually, as they had been. And, so, that’s where I would say those builders are taking advantage of our homeowners and taking advantage of our generosity. Council Member Olsen said well, and they’re hanging onto that cash. Administrator Levitt replied exactly, and all they would have to do is be able to coordinate the schedules, and that’s really an option that developer-builder have. And, so, the people who are being penalized are our residents because what happens is those lots sit all summer, and I’m sure you’ve seen it, right? You’ve seen the silt fence, and you’ve seen the mulch sprayed all over, and then you see rivets all over the place, and these people have installed their irrigation, and now they’re out there regrading it, they’ve damaged the irrigation and all this stuff, right? The people who will continue to pay are our residents and not us. I mean, can you tell I’m becoming irritated? It bothers me because they’re really taking advantage of our residents, and the residents want us to have some leverage, right? But trust me, over the 20 years, I’ve had plenty of people crying to me, “I’m supposed to close on Friday, I need a Temp CO.” Yep, that happens, right? But now we have a mechanism, if your builder didn’t do it, he has to give us $8K. Council Member Olsen said yeah, there’s a degree of accountability. Administrator Levitt replied, exactly. So, now that resident who’s going to get the TCO because they cried, which honestly, who does not want to close on their dream house, you know, on Friday, because they have the mover already scheduled? We’re not going to stand in the way, but your builder can post an $8K escrow, and he’ll be really motivated to get your sod and all that stuff done for you. So, if we do this, I’m telling you, they’re going to be a little bit irritated and you may hear about it, but at the end of the day, I feel like we’re protecting the residents. I’m sorry, Emily, I took all of your responses. Council Member Olsen asked Administrator Levitt, do you feel better now? She replied, I do, I feel fine, thank you. Council Member Olsen said you look lighter, yes. Mayor Bailey said well, it’s interesting because I mean TCOs, I can totally see it during the winter for some of the things, but to have those kind of numbers over the summer months, that’s not right. Council Member Olsen said and again, in commercial developments, it is super common, I get it because of the scope. Council Member Garza said as a member of the Council, I think that’s a good idea, and especially some escrow; so, it’s not, we’re not charging them. Council Member Olsen said yeah, they can recapture that. Mayor Bailey asked what’s the original amount that’s in there, Emily? She replied the original builder escrow is somewhere around, and actually we just reevaluated it. Council Member Olsen asked it’s a percentage, is it not? Director Schmitz replied no, in the DA, it’s actually a number, so that includes sod, a boulevard tree, and then the inspection for the curb box. Right now, it’s about $7,200 for that escrow, and I want to be clear that number is more up-to-date with the cost of truly what it costs to sod a yard. We hadn’t reevaluated that for some time, and I think we learned that after that development. Council Member Olsen said yeah, after that development that went sideways. Council Member Garza said yeah, after the storm, we just learned all that. Director Schmitz said so at least that escrow would cover if or when you do have a developer who doesn’t do all of this. Mayor Bailey said okay. City Council Meeting January 22, 2025 Page 20 of 20 Council Member Olsen said yeah, you raised a good point about protecting the end user; I think that’s very valid. I’m good with it. Council Member Clausen agreed, and Council Member Thiede said yes, I agree. Mayor Bailey said there you go. Are there any other items to cover? Council Member Olsen asked you’re going to codify this, though, right? So, it’ll come before us in a Code that we’re going to need to approve? Director Schmitz replied so, this will be a Policy, as opposed to in our actual Code. But a Policy is just the same, and then at least we can hold them accountable in our Development Agreement moving forward; Administrator Levitt said and we’ll memorialize it, so there’s nothing hidden, and there’s no gain to us, it’ll be straight. Council Member Olsen said so, it will be baked right in, perfect. Council Member Clausen said I think we’ll hear some of that pushback. So, I’m just curious how they’ll explain why they didn’t do this in the summer in our community vs. the other communities where they have to get it done, why it’s just here. Council Member Olsen said right. 14. WORKSHOPS - CLOSED TO PUBLIC - None. 15. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Council Member Olsen, second by Council Member Thiede, to adjourn the meeting at 8:27 p.m. Motion carried: 5-0. Mayor Bailey said we’re adjourned, thanks everyone. Minutes prepared by Judy Graf and reviewed by Tamara Anderson, City Clerk. 1 City Council Action Request 7.C. Meeting Date 2/5/2025 Department Public Works Agenda Category Action Item Title Public Services Commission Meeting Minutes (11/18/24) Staff Recommendation Approve the November 18, 2024, Public Services Commission meeting minutes. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. 11-18-2024 Public Services Commission Meeting MINUTES COTTAGE GROVE PUBLIC SERVICES November 18, 2024 COMMISSION 12800 Ravine Parkway South Cottage Grove, MN 55016 COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 7:00 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER Vice Chair Ron Kath called the Public Services Commission meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Vice Chair Kath asked everyone to stand and recite the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. ROLL CALL Vice Chair Kath was advised that Roll Call had been taken; Chair Lisa Kons and Commissioner Jenny Olson were absent. 4. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA Commissioner Tracy Jenson made a motion to approve the agenda; Commissioner Kelsey Moyer seconded. Motion carried: 5-0. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. APPROVE MINUTES FROM THE OCTOBER 21, 2024 MEETING Motion by Commissioner Nate Lotts to approve the October 21, 2024 meeting minutes; Commissioner Kelsey Moyer seconded. Motion carried: 5-0. 6. OPEN FORUM Vice Chair Kath opened the Open Forum. As no one wished to speak on items not on tonight’s agenda, Vice Chair Kath closed the Open Forum. 7. PRESENTATIONS A. SNOWMOBILE CLUB UPDATE Public Works Director Ryan Burfeind stated each year before the winter season, we like to meet with our Snowmobile Club and take a look at the Snowmobile Trail Map. The Public Safety Department will usually report if there have been any issues in the last season, but unfortunately there wasn’t much snow in the last season to provide opportunities for snowmobiling. Hopefully, this year will be different. I will say in talking with Jeremy Goebel, the Snowmobile Club President, there are no changes to the Snowmobile Trail Map, so we’re not looking for any formal recommendation to approve a new map at this time. From the City’s Public Services Commission Meeting November 18, 2024 Page 2 of 12 standpoint, I think over the past couple years there’s been a lot of effort on the south part of Cottage Grove: There’s a snowmobile trail along 100th Street, 100th Street has been redone with some realignment on the west end, so we wanted to make sure to keep that trail open and not have it close once those road improvements are done. I think we’ve done a good job of that, that project is complete, and the trail is still able to operate on the south side of 100th Street. So, at this point, we’re not anticipating any coming changes right now where it would affect the snowmobile map, but that’s something we’re always going to keep discussing with the Snowmobile Club. We don’t want to be in a situation where a development moves into an area and all of a sudden its forcing the snowmobile trail out because those are great connections to have. With that, Jeremy is here tonight to give an update from his side. Jeremy Goebel introduced himself as the President of the East Cottage Grove Scramblers. We mark and maintain everything south of Valley Creek up in Woodbury, along 95, down to Andersen Windows and down to Highway 10 and 61, by the County Point gas station. Our club does everything, we mark it, we groom it, we bush hog it, all that stuff. We also put on the Dust ‘Em Off Vintage Snowmobile Show in our field; that’s January 4, and that’s a great event that we brought to the community so we’re happy about that. Over the last four years of having it, we’ve raised over $10,000 and given back to the community and charities. We’re very proud of that, we just donated to the Food Shelf here at our last meeting, so that was very cool. This year we’ve added a Radar Run to it, so hopefully it will bring out more people to the event and there’ll be a good turnout. As far as the trail, we’ve been starting to mark stuff and we haven’t seen any issues. If you have any concerns or want to see anything changed or done, let me know and I’ll make it happen. We definitely don’t wan to lose what we have because we like to ride around here. Jeremy asked if there were any questions. Vice Chair Kath thanked Jeremy and asked if the commissioners had any questions or comments this evening; there were none.. Vice Chair Kath said well, you know I’m going to have a comment because I’m an avid snowmobiler, so I always like to remind the community and volunteers like yourself, it is a volunteer to put all those trail markers up there. So, for the young people that get on their sleds and like to run around all over the place, let’s stay on the trails because it’s a privilege to be on these trails, it’s not our right to be on these trails. I like to remind people of that all the time. So, thank you to you and your club, I enjoyed even last year without the snow coming out to the event that you had; you guys still had a really nice turnout and thank you for doing that for the community. Jeremy said I appreciate it. Commissioner Moyer said I also want to thank you for what you guys do for the community, that’s really awesome to hear. Jeremy said thank you. Vice Chair Kath thanked Jeremey and said now all we need is snow. I know some people don’t want the snow, but there are a few of us that do like it. 8. BUSINESS ITEMS A. GRANADA PARK PARKING RESTRICTION UPDATE Zac Dockter, Parks and Recreation Director, stated I’ll start the process tonight. Obviously, there’s a lot that comes into play here with the concerns on parking on Granada Avenue, but it relates to Granada Park. So, I think it’s appropriate to start with a little bit of history of Granada Park, its got a really unique history; its one of our smaller parks at only 1.8 acres, but it was acquired in the early ‘60s from a company, David Realty, and they actually dedicated I think it was three-or-four lots there. They had 12 lots, and they couldn’t sell the last four, and this was before Orrin Thompson; then Orrin Thompson came in and built thousands of homes in the ‘60s, ‘70s, and ‘80s. So, it’s a small park with a playground and maybe some picnicking, and that was about it. In 1973, residents passed a referendum to improve parks and add the Ice Arena, and this is one of the parks that got improved: That actually added a new playground, a picnic shelter, and then it added two tennis courts. So, it was a pretty popular park in the ‘70s, ‘80s, and ‘90s. In the later ‘90s and early 2000s, it became an underused park, as the community demographics had changed, maybe to an older neighborhood, whatever it might be. We started getting a lot of complaints and police calls for loitering, vandalism, graffiti, and things of that nature. In 2010, the playground was to be replaced, and we did a survey of the community with what they wanted to see in the park. Picnicking, pickleball or a sport court, and a new playground were some of the top items, and then some additional landscaping and additional green space. So, we reconfigured the park again, I think it was in 2014: We got rid of the two tennis courts that were from 1973, they needed to be replaced one way or the other; it was a matter of whether they went away permanently or we changed them to something else. Tennis clearly isn’t as popular as it was in the ‘70s, when that was at its height, so we converted to three pickleball courts, which were the first three dedicated pickleball courts in Cottage Grove. I don’t think I have to explain how popular pickleball has become since then, it’s really taken off, so we were glad to have that. It really held its own Public Services Commission Meeting November 18, 2024 Page 3 of 12 for a while, the club played out of there, and it managed itself pretty well, but then it just exploded in the last five-to-seven years. So, we knew Granada Park and the way it’s located, with no parking, with just the three courts, and its proximity to the neighborhood and everything else, we needed to find a new location. We built six new pickleball courts last year that opened up this spring at Glacial Valley Park, and then we have two other courts around the community. We actually have five more pickleball courts that are programmed to go into Woodridge Park next year. So, when we redo the hockey rink next year, we’re going to put them inside the hockey rink at Woodridge, to make those rinks a little more multiuse; so it’s a great opportunity to do that, and I think we talked about it with the CIP, the last time I was here with you. In the meantime, we got some complaints starting I believe it was this year, maybe even last year, of some of the parking issues. A resident had called us with concerns about parking in front of the fire hydrant, blocking mailboxes, using driveways as turnarounds, just generally creating unsafe conditions for the youth that use the streets for bicycling or walking or whatever it might be, and then also just the sheer traffic volume from the cars on both sides of the road. So, those were the concerns I heard. Given the complaint, I coordinated with Public Works and the Police Department and asked what do we want to do? I know they sent out a Community Service Officer to talk with one of the residents. I personally have driven by many, many times, it’s kind of our routine. I’ve seen busy parking, but I can’t say I’ve seen all the issues because I don’t live there, and the resident showed me pictures so I can’t disagree that there’s some of these issues going on. It’s different when you drive by than when you actually live in the neighborhood, I’m sure. I can’t personally vouch for what happens or doesn’t happen, but certainly there is a lot of on-road parking at certain times of the day, depending on the situation, that could create frustration for residents. Director Dockter said I’m not an engineer, I’m not a law enforcement officer, so at some point I’ll let those folks answer some of the questions you might have, but we did look at a potential parking lot option, as there is some green space on the north side of the park, if you look at the image there. I will say that just for reference, the parking lot would have to be considerably bigger than the size of those pickleball courts on the bottom, so you can see it would take up almost all that green space, which is meant to be an open turf area to throw Frisbees, play catch, whatever it might be. It’s going to be probably a six-figure investment with curb and gutter and pavement and everything else that goes into a parking lot. So, it’s a significant investment, so that’s why we thought a public process is probably a good way to start this, let’s get some feedback from the community, let’s let the Public Services Commission talk about it, and see where that might take us. Director Dockter said with that, I will answer any questions you might have, or maybe we need additional staff comment from our Public Works Director or the Police Department. Director Burfeind said I think I have a little more I could add and then I’ll turn it over to Captain Brad Petersen as well, just to maybe just to give the full context. Like Zac said, from an engineering standpoint, it was also looked at because sometimes there might be things like a sight line, maybe there’s a crosswalk. A good example is we’ve got the Bike Park up at West Draw Park where there’s a trail corridor that actually runs and continues across Meadow Grass Avenue; to be closer to the Bike Park, people were parking pretty heavily on Meadow Grass when there is a dedicated parking lot for that park. Because of that, they were blocking a sight line of a pretty busy trail corridor of people coming and going. So, there, there was a pretty strong need to do something; we didn’t actually get rid of all the parking, we just kind of eliminating approaching the crosswalk so we could have the sight lines. Also, there was a better place to park, there was a dedicated parking lot for that park that we wanted folks to use. In this area, like Zac mentioned, there’s not a dedicated parking lot. So, I guess one thing to consider with a parking restriction is we’re not going to eliminate the use of that park; so, if we put a parking restriction here, people who want to use that park just have to park a little farther away, but still on a street without a sidewalk. So, that was a consideration: If they’re parking somewhere else, do they have a sidewalk to walk to that park, or would they be walking in the road? It doesn’t necessarily allow them or force them to park in a better or safer location; there’s not a specific crosswalk here, but there is a point where there’s kind of a little bit of a trail from the park enters into the road, and there’s a pedestrian ramp just to allow folks who are parking in the road to get onto the park property, but it’s not necessarily a true crosswalk. From that standpoint, there wasn’t necessarily a hard engineering standard or guideline to follow to enforce this restriction. So, as Zac mentioned, we thought it would be a great way just to really have some feedback and introduce this to the commission tonight and get your feedback on it. It’s more of an impacted neighborhood, right? You’ve got that parking, but if there’s no parking, does that push the issue somewhere else? I think another consideration was the more pickleball courts that are being built, is that going to kind of spread out the use a little bit, change how heavily used these are? I think that’s something we wanted to see as well. So, that’s some of the engineering background. I don't know if Brad has anything to add. Captain Petersen said I can add a little bit of context. It is true, we have had a handful of complaints regarding the parking situation; the exact extent or number of complaints is a little bit hard to determine because most of them haven’t come in through the normal route, through Dispatch, where there’s a documented incident number. A lot of these concerns have been voiced informally through emails or phone calls or whatever, so we’ve lost kind of the ability to track exactly how many problems or incidents have been reported to us. We did begin to investigate the concerns, we sent some member of our Community Service Officer Division and our Community Impact Team out to observe the neighborhood during the day and evening hours. Public Services Commission Meeting November 18, 2024 Page 4 of 12 So, we spent some hours out there just monitoring the situation. They went door to door, talked to some of the residents, not all, but some of the residents that were available and willing to talk. We started to assess the situation, and we don’t feel like at this moment there’s any traffic management or safety concerns that would make this an imminent matter that needs to be addressed; and I don’t say that to minimize the citizens’ concerns or negate the fact that there is a neighborhood impact that needs to be assessed. At this point, Public Safety doesn’t necessarily have a position or recommendation, but we’re 100% willing to participate in the process and see where that leads us. Vice Chair Kath said okay, thank you. So, at this point, there’s no formal recommendation, so this is kind of the first hearing of the proposals of concern? Director Burfeind replied yes, that’s correct. Vice Chair Kath said okay, with that, then, I’ll open it up to the commission for any questions first or maybe we’ll take a pause; is there anybody in the audience that would like to address the commission on this subject this evening? If you would, just come up and state your name and your address, please. Jeff Huberty said I live at 8398 Granada Avenue; this is directly across from the park. I’ve done a lot of the complaints, I’ve emailed Zac, I’ve emailed the mayor. I do have a letter that I’ll just kind of go over some stuff here that you had said. Some of the stuff that you had said is stuff that I have on my paperwork here. What we’ve experienced is an extraordinary, and it’s not every day, so you can’t drive on Tuesday morning and see the impacts of the park that we see. We live there and it’s constant. When they did first open it, it was probably a lot busier, but now what happens is you have these people that come in, constantly using our parking in front of my house. My house is, if you look at this picture, directly across three cars parked in front of my house, constantly during the summer. Now, I’m not saying every night, but two, three nights a week; there’s nights at the park where the whole park is full of people, there’s 30, 40 cars parked along the roads, and these cars are bumper to bumper, they’re squeezing in space to try and get there. And there’s a large group of people that make it a, I don't know if it’s some kind of tournament that come there weekly and take over the whole park from the north open field there all the way down. But the issues that we have seen is I virtually had one lady, it was a big van, like a large van for transporting children, and there were four, five children in this van on one of the hottest days during the summer, and it was running with the air conditioning on where the lady was over playing pickleball. I walked up to the van to check on it, and there was an infant in the van. So, I did call the police on that one, and they came out and they talked to the lady. I don't know what the results were, but she’s constantly been parking, trying to antagonize with her parking. And going forward here, like I said, there’s times I feel that I’m not getting the use out of my property that I paid for; I have a large boat that I pull in and out of my driveway, there’s times when I come home from being out of town, and I have to call ahead to see if I can even get in my driveway. There’s times when I can’t leave my driveway because I’ve got to wait until these cars are moved. And, again, what they do is they park bumper-to-bumper across the park, and the dangerous part, I have my own selfish reasons why I don’t like it, I think it invades our privacy, the safety of the kids, this used to be a nice, quiet little park and it was always kids that used it. There were always kids over there; I mean, there are different generations that have gone through there, my kids grew up there, different other neighborhood kids. There used to be a pool down at the end of the road, on Granada and 85th, I believe it was. And that was always used by kids, and it was always a nice park, it was always quiet. And we’re not opposed to, I guess I’m not opposed to the pickleball, what I’m opposed to is the invasion of privacy that we get from the pickleball. I can’t look out my window at night, my front window is probably 40-to-50 feet from the street. And I can’t even open my windows, these people are in the driveway, I had kids skateboarding down my driveway because their parents were all over at the park, playing pickleball. I feel like I’m going on and on about this, but I feel there’s a real safety hazard that’s been caused by this, the bumper-to-bumper traffic. When you watch the little kids that go into that park, we’re there all day, me and my wife, and these little kids have to go into the park, in between cars. Now, there’s a path at the park where they’re supposed to access it, but the cars park bumper to bumper to it, and we’ve called about parking there. And I’m not trying to, I’m not saying anything bad, I’m just saying it’s not a high priority parking. I’ve called about the hydrants, people park in front of the hydrants, but the issue becomes the safety of the kids now and my grandkids. When they come out to my house, they have to go in between two cars, walk out in the middle of the street and look both ways to try and watch for traffic. Now, you know all little kids don’t do that, they run in between, and there’s times where it’s been pretty close to some bad results. I just think with the parking on the one side of the street, I agree, does it move down, does it move traffic elsewhere and park in front of other people’s houses? Well, if that’s the concern, there should be concern about people parking in front of my house, too. So, my thought has always been since I’ve talked is the parking on one side of the street; that if you go around most parks in Cottage Grove, the residential sides of those streets, there’s no parking, all along the parks. Otherwise, there’s off- the-road parking provided for those parks. So, something needs to be done. I like the thought of a parking spot in the park, to go ahead and just put a parking lot there, but there needs to be restrictions also because the park is getting overcrowded, and you can’t just have a parking lot with 12 cars there and then people parking on the street again because it’s just going to bring more traffic in. So, my thoughts, again, personally, I feel like we’ve really lost our, we don’t have the privacy of our home that we used Public Services Commission Meeting November 18, 2024 Page 5 of 12 to have anymore, and I’ve asked people, politely asked people to move their cars, it turns into a confrontation. There’s not a lot of respect from people out there these days; if you ask them to move their car, they take it as an offense. Vice Chair Kath thanked Mr. Huberty for coming forward and sharing his thoughts with us. Again, there’ll be no recommendation from our commission this evening. Moving forward, it’ll still be a public issue; this is only the first step, in my mind, of moving forward, so there’ll be plenty of opportunity to bring this forward to other commissions and obviously some day, if it does make it all the way to the Council for a final decision, we wouldn’t be the folks that make the final decision at that point. But thank you for coming this evening. Mr. Huberty started to ask a question; Vice Chair Kath said I need to wrap it up, as public speaking time is technically three minutes and we went past that, we were almost into ten minutes, so I don’t want to belittle anything. Mr. Huberty said I want to ask a question. Vice Chair Kath said well, we’ll let the commission ask some questions, and if anything comes up and certainly if we have time, we can certainly answer any other questions for you, too, okay? Mr. Huberty said okay, thank you for your time. Vice Chair Kath replied you bet. Vice Chair Kath said so, with that, I guess I’ll open it up to our commission now for any questions or comments that we would have. He asked Director Burfeind were you looking for a recommendation this evening? Director Burfeind replied we want to hear if the commissioners do have input or opinions on this matter, I think we’d want to hear them so we can kind of take that into the consideration process, but it is the City Council that ultimately would have to approve or not approve a parking restriction. I think it is a real challenge just because it’s an impact; it’s not a situation, just to be clear, where we can do like resident parking only, that’s not really an enforceable signage to really use. There’s places where it is around the community, but you can’t really enforce it because just the residents at that address should really be parking there; if you have visitors over, they’re going to have a different address, and that’s something that can be looked up. So, it is an impact. I think if we were going to move ahead, I think we’d want to get some more formal feedback from anyone who would have that impact because you now can’t park in front of your home anymore, and visitors can also not park in front of your home. So, that’s kind of why we like to weigh all options, but this commission, looking at the Public Safety and Public Works side of it, any input and opinions that you may have on the matter is what we’re looking for. Vice Chair Kath said and probably even you know any other information that we think maybe should be looked at; I think that’s the one thing I learned when we looked at the Hillside sidewalk issue that was brought forward. We came back and said we think there’s a couple other things that we need to look at first before we even move the process forward so that might come out of tonight’s discussion. Director Burfeind said that is a good example in that Hillside case, and we’ll be bringing that back, likely in January for a final consideration with the information we’ve gathered. That’s something we could do here as well. Obviously, we’re in the winter season now where I assume the use isn’t as high, so we want to kind of address it over this winter season. Vice Chair Kath said okay, perfect. With that, I’ll open it up to commissioners for comments: Commissioner Jenson said I have kind of a comment or question as well, but just looking at an aerial view of the park, it does seem particularly challenging just because it feels like we’re forcing everything onto Granada. There really aren’t any good side streets on the east side of the park, and that’s why we’re really concentrating all that traffic on Granada, and then not having a parking lot, I can see where the issues are arising. So, I hate to take park land away, but it seems like without a lot of other good options, it might be something that has to be considered with the parking lot. Commissioner Lise Alden-Rediske had a couple questions: So, has it only started getting busy since the implementation of the pickleball courts, or has it been busy like this, back to back, for years and years? Mr. Huberty replied no, it’s the pickleball courts. Commissioner Alden-Rediske said it’s an attraction. Mr. Huberty said like you said, it’s a very popular sport, and we’re not opposed to the pickleball, it’s the invasion of privacy in the neighborhood. Commissioner Alden-Rediske said I didn’t know if it was trending up just because of the attraction or if it’s always that way. If a parking lot is on the table, are you thinking like a 6-car parking lot or 12 or 50? Because I also know that there’s a desire to keep green space, which is part of the park land, and you don’t want to encroach too much on that, but I don’t even see sidewalks on either side of the street here. So, if somebody was to park on the street, you’d have to walk on the street if you can’t get to the grass because cars are bumped up against each other; it makes it a challenge. So, I’m curious, if a parking lot is an option, what size parking lot are you thinking? Director Dockter replied we would anticipate a 10-to-14 stall type parking lot, but then you’d have a handicap stall as well, which takes up some additional space there, but that’s what we would anticipate to actually cover the service needs of what’s happening in that park today. Public Services Commission Meeting November 18, 2024 Page 6 of 12 Commissioner Alden-Rediske said and then that leads me to my next follow-up question to that, if it’s 10-to-14, but let’s say it’s like 8-to-12 spaces or something, it seems like you’d still have that same issue on the street. Director Dockter replied yes, I think you would, during peak times you’re still going to have on-street parking, and it’s hard to know. Again, we’re opening more pickleball courts; I don't know if pickleball keeps trending up or if it becomes like tennis and it trends down eventually. Those are all really hard questions to answer, but there’s going to be times, given the way the park is used today, I have to imagine there’s still going to be times where’s there’s going to be on-street parking regardless if a parking lot is there or not. Commissioner Alden-Rediske said I’ve seen on some locations where they put little stripes where this car can be in this spot and this car can be in this spot, and so it kind of prevents the bumper to bumper. I don't know if that would actually make a difference, but it’s an idea. Director Dockter replied I would have to defer to our Public Works Director on that. Director Burfeind said that is a good question, and I think that that can help. In a lot of our parks, we don’t have that striping, but I can think of a few that we do because certainly while there are some parks that have dedicated parking lots, I’d say most of them don’t. So, thinking about Cedarhurst Meadows Park that’s up in Eastridge Woods, kind of north of 70th Street, that has striped parking. The future Denzer Park, which is going to be down off the realign of Hadley Avenue there, we do have some striped parking. So, that is something we could look into, which obviously would be a lower cost, but it would help. I think people usually obey that, to be within your parking lines; is it foolproof? No, but I think that definitely can help manage the bumper-to- bumper situation. Commissioner Moyer asked is this the only entrance? I see like this little sidewalk into this white square; is that like the only entrance into the park that we have? Director Dockter replied yes, that’s the only paved entrance into the park. Commissioner Moyer said and then I’m just wondering if there was to be a parking lot there, where would the funding come from and how would we be able to provide that? Director Dockter replied there currently is no funding source dedicated for this, so through the Capital Improvements Planning process, we would have to reallocate or reprioritize to fund a parking lot. Commissioner Lotts said in previous places I’ve visited, I’ve seen reminder signs, if you will, for parking distances to driveways. Is that something that we actually have a City Ordinance for? Like you can’t park within I think it’s 5 feet of a driveway and 20 feet of a stop sign, something like that; do we have that policy or that City Ordinance? Captain Petersen replied a State Statute addresses parking, and there’s also some Ordinance, too, but to be completely honest, it’s been a minute since I’ve looked at that, and I can’t say with certainty whether there is or is not an Ordinance that would address parking in that situation. Commissioner Lotts said okay, because I just know that that’s a fantastic reminder, at least for myself, because I sometimes will park too close to a driveway, so I’ll actually drive down the block and park somewhere else because I see the sign posted, “Don’t Park Within 5 Feet of this Driveway” or whatever. And then parking on one side of the road, do you think if that was the option, do you think that’s sufficient enough parking, or would it just essentially overflow further down the block? I’ve never driven past this park, so I don't know how busy it is. Director Dockter said maybe I can answer; again, there are days where there’s just so much volume that I think it’s going to be double loaded on both sides, probably the length of the park. But there’s also a large majority of the time where that’s not the case, where I think if you just do single loaded parking, you can see the size of the cars on the map, you can fit quite a few cars on the park side. Of course, people take the easiest route, right? So, they’ll park in this gentleman’s front yard vs. parking 50 feet down the road on the park side, I believe. Now, there’s some cases, again, where it’s just busy enough on those particular situations where they’re going to park on both sides. Single-sided parking would certainly hopefully push people to stack up on the other side, on the east side, according to this image; I’m not sure if that’s the north-south alignment there. Commissioner Lotts said I don't know, I think my first question would be about the Ordinance and parking with the driveways, like distance to driveways; if that’s a thing or if it’s not, I’m not sure. That would obviously kind of help me make a decision, but obviously we’re not here to make a decision tonight, but that’s just kind of the question I had. Director Burfeind said one thing I would add, Commissioner Lotts, just because you did ask about pushing that further away, I should maybe clarify when I had mentioned if there’s a concern, we would push it away; I don’t think that’s ever to say well, we’d rather have them park in front of these homes or these homes. It’s just more cars are still parking on the street, and is there an overall public benefit, and the issue is they’re just walking a further distance on a street without a sidewalk to get to the park. So, I definitely never want to make it sound like we’re in favor of having different homes have the parking, it’s just purely from the standpoint of they’re using Granada Park, there’s just a general safety perspective to be parking closer to the park. Public Services Commission Meeting November 18, 2024 Page 7 of 12 Vice Chair Kath said one of the questions I have is there’s no lights at this park; so, after dark, there’s no issue, right? Director Dockter replied correct. Vice Chair Kath asked and is it heavily used on weekdays vs. weekends? Is there any difference between a weekday vs. a weekend? Director Dockter replied I believe there’s a little bit of both. Mr. Huberty said it’s pretty consistent. If I could speak, I would like to ask two questions; Vice Chair Kath replied sure, but please come to the podium then. Mr. Huberty said so, my one question is the size of the park, 1.6 acres. The amount of facilities that are there to accommodate large crowds is not there; there’s a one-person Satellite for, at times, 100 people in the park, 40 cars in the road, 100 people in the park. The facilities aren’t there to support that many people. The other question, I think I may have misspoken previously about having only residents park on their side; my issue was on most parks in Cottage Grove, on the residential sides of the streets, not residents, the residential sides of the streets it’s no parking. You can drive around all the parks in Cottage Grove, and in front of their homes there’s “No Parking” signs. So, my question is what’s the parameter that allows no parking in front of those parks, but allows that kind of parking in front of this park? Vice Chair Kath said I don't know if anybody on staff can answer those questions for us. Director Burfeind said I don’t think we’d have it at our fingertips, but we could certainly just research our different parks in the area; I know Belden Park, which is right down the road, does have no parking on the residential side of the street, I believe, so that one I know. But I think as staff we could look at that and coming back to a future meeting, we could have that data, specifically, the number of kind of neighborhood parks and if there’s a no parking restriction adjacent to it. Vice Chair Kath said that, to me, would be a big one because you want to be consistent throughout the City at that point, then. So, I think that would be a good takeaway for sure. Vice Chair Kath said and then the other question about the facilities, I guess maybe Zac, you can answer; what’s the parameter for Porta Potties and those kind of amenities within a park structure. Director Dockter replied again, that’s a hard one, but I guess I’ll just say we’ve had one Satellite, one portable restroom out there, and to my knowledge, we haven’t had any complaints with it being underserviced or anything like that. So, it seems like it must be keeping up, and we do check them; and then obviously the vendor who services those tells us if they’re being overutilized. So, I’m not too concerned about that at this point, but obviously, if that’s something where it happens, then we would have to add another unit there. Director Dockter said one thing to consider with the one-sided parking, too, which I don’t think we’ve talked about tonight, but one of our concerns as staff is just that when we do the public process that the other residents are aware that if there’s no parking on that side of the street, there’s no parking for anybody. So, if you have visitors over or guests over, they would have to park on the other side of the street, too, so that’s one thing I think I forgot to mention. It’s just important to know that, it doesn’t influence the decision other than we’ll want to make sure that all the residents understand if there’s a “No Parking” sign in front of their house, that applies to them, too. Mr. Huberty said I’d like to address the one thing about the restroom in the park again. Vice Chair Kath said again, I’d like to stay focused on the issue at hand, which is the parking issue and not the restrooms. Mr. Huberty said I’m just trying to get my point across so that you can understand where I’m coming from. It’s not that the restroom is not being maintained, it’s from a public health standpoint. There’s a picnic pavilion there, people come, large families come, and they have picnics in this park. There’s nothing there health safety wise that would allow that kind of traffic and have no place to wash your hands, one place to go to the restroom for that many people, and I know that there are standards for that, and that’s what I’m getting at. That park is too small for the amount of people that use it; it’s a health hazard and it’s a safety hazard. Vice Chair Kath said okay, we appreciate the comment. Commissioner Alden-Rediske said I have a question. So, this may not be a popular opinion, but I’m trying to like grasp what’s going on here. It sounds like increased traffic and picnics and lots of people there, based on the attraction of the pickleball courts. Have there been discussions about removing the pickleball courts, you know, if the courts are going to be placed at other places, like Glacial Valley and other areas? Is there a desire to have those removed? Director Dockter replied no, we have not discussed that at this point. Obviously, when facilities are getting used, we usually see that as a positive thing, so this is not always the norm, so new waters for us maybe. Commissioner Alden-Rediske said and for me as well. I like that people are using the facilities, but it’s also nice when our facilities can accommodate the number of people. So, if it’s only once in a blue moon and you’re having a tournament and you’re like getting a lot of people there, that would be different. I don't know how they plan this out, I don’t know if there’s leagues or groups that get together, and if there are, could that group like reserve extra Porta Potties to like handle that and make sure they Public Services Commission Meeting November 18, 2024 Page 8 of 12 have hand sanitizer in there? I don't know, and I agree this is a parking conversation, not a Porta Potty conversation, but I would be interested to hear from more residents what are your thoughts on the pickleball courts? Do you want to keep them, do you want to remove them? Would that fix the parking issue? I don't know. And my only one other comment, a little separate, this is for the sidewalk that goes into the park; could we put up signs that say, “No Parking Between Signs,” which would then allow that open space for the sidewalk to allow kids and human traffic to walk through there? Director Burfeind said that’s a good question, that’s definitely something we could do, and that’s something that we have done in other areas. Even though it’s not a crosswalk, obviously people are coming and going from that location, and if you have some separation, you can see the cars more, and that’s something we could definitely do. We usually do it either 25-or-50 feet in each direction; we’d want to be cognizant of not taking away too much parking next to the park, but I think we could definitely look at that. Vice Chair Kath said and I think that’s where my head was; usually, it’s the other thing, we’re not using the facilities or the land and now we have the opposite thing, but we use it and now we have this other issue. I can appreciate having people park in their yard, I’d probably argue a little bit that I have the same problem in my neighborhood and there is no park, it’s just my neighbors like to park on the street in front of my house all the time. I have a boat, too, so I can appreciate backing boats in, so I can hear where you’re coming from there. I think, Ryan, what I heard this evening, and Zac, is that we want to definitely look at the stripe painting and get some options, probably that the Parks Commission would want to look at and obviously Public Service. We want to look at the Ordinance and make sure we’re consistent with the Ordinance moving forward. Looking at our other parks, staying somewhat in compliance so we don’t have one park one way and another park the other way; because then, as a resident, you’re like well, just because I live here, it doesn’t make sense to me. So, I think a lot of those questions are going to have to be answered before it ever comes to Council, so I think you guys still have a lot of homework to do is my feeling at this point. To me, this seems like a really good start. Obviously, as a resident, you’ve been probably bringing this all summer; has this been going on for a year, two years, or is it just kind of recently it’s really been getting? Mr. Huberty replied this summer. Vice Chair Kath said so this summer it’s been more prevalent than it has been in the past, then. And, again, we don’t know what’s going to happen when the other courts start opening up, too. From my point of view tonight, for our commission, I think we’ve asked some good questions and we got a lot of dialogue going. We took some feedback from the person that’s really affected by it, which I think is really good in a public forum. We have two Council people here this evening that are hearing this, too, so, I think that is really good, and I welcome it to come back to us. Again, I’ll go back to the sidewalk conversation, we brought up a lot of these different questions for you guys to do a little bit more homework before you bring it back to the two commissions. So, I guess as far as I’m concerned, commissioners, I think we’re at a good spot unless you feel we need to bring any other dialogue or questions at this point. Vice Chair Kath said to our resident, I’d definitely stay involved with the process, and again, we’ll get the other residents involved, too, as we move forward. With that, then, are there any other comments from staff before I move the agenda? Director Burfeind said thank you for a good discussion tonight on this, commission. I know it’s hard when it’s such a direct impact to specific residents; and speaking of that, I think we could as staff maybe get some more formal response, just in case folks aren’t able to come to these public meetings, just to hear their direct feedback, and if they’re for or against that restriction. Because that’s really who’s impacted here, it’s the specific residents, and by putting that in place, it’s a direct impact to their property any other way; so, I think we can also get that feedback and have that the next time we discuss this if you’d like that. Vice Chair Kath replied okay. And then, Ryan, you had mentioned before the meeting that the communication that’ll go out, it’s emailed normally to the residents or letters that get sent out to them? Director Burfeind replied it would be a letter. Vice Chair Kath said it would be letters to all the residents and they would know when the next public hearing or format like this would be, and they could give feedback at that point, whether it’s the Parks Commission or this commission again? Director Burfeind confirmed that. Vice Chair Kath said okay, great. Well, thank you, staff, thank you to our resident that came here this evening; I thought it was a really good discussion this evening. 9. COMMISSION COMMENTS Commissioner Jenson said just kudos to Public Works; I tried the Work Order for a streetlight that was out, and when I came out to leave tonight, it was on. So, I’m not sure if it was a coincidence or it worked, so, thank you, I appreciate that. It was an easy process and nice to be able to submit it electronically. Commissioner Lotts said I’m just happy to be here. Public Services Commission Meeting November 18, 2024 Page 9 of 12 Vice Chair Kath said I have just a quick question for Ryan, more for the public knowledge, you know, we’ve had a lot of work being done kind of on the corner of Jamaica and 80th Street. They’ve been putting a lot of utilities in there, digging up the road and putting pipes underneath stuff, which is amazing to me how they do all that. But it seems like the last couple weeks now there’s no work being done out there, but we still got some lanes going in a couple different directions. Can you speak to that this evening? Director Burfeind replied you’re 100% right that that project was wrapping up. They were still working down on the far west end, by Park High School, and they kind of had to leave a lot of those pits open just as a final kind of tie in and charging up of the line. But it’s my understanding that that work is all done, and they were intending to have the traffic control gone by last Friday; it clearly is not, so our engineer I know is reaching out to Xcel today to figure out what’s going on with that. Because clearly Public Works will be plowing soon, and then that stuff will definitely be right in our way, and we’ll be kind of flinging it off to the side of the road. So, we do need to get that out of there, and since it didn’t happen by last Friday, I’m hoping we can get it out of there this week. Vice Chair Kath said okay, perfect, that was the only question I had. 10. STAFF REPORTS AND MATERIALS Director Burfeind said I can go first, and I’ll let Gary cover more of the streets part of the Public Works update. Director Burfeind said maybe from an engineering standpoint first, we do have the River Oaks RCUT (Reduced Conflict U-Turn) intersection completely open to traffic now in all the different directions. There were some delays just getting the lighting operational, and that’s kind of a MnDOT standard to have that fully open and complete, so that is done. I think we’ve gotten great feedback, specifically from the school because with the busing, they see that as a major safety improvement; we heard from them right away that they appreciate that improvement. For the general use of the golf course, it takes some getting used to, but I think it really is all about a safety improvement and really just cutting down the number of traffic movements when you’re leaving there. When you have that median that’s open, it can really just be too enticing to be looking both directions, you’re trying to make it across the entire road in one shot, and that’s how major injuries can happen. When we install these RCUT intersections, there still can be incidents, of course, and bad decisions by a driver, but it changes from like a sideswipe crash to a rearend crash, which statistically is a much lower severity crash. So, we’re excited to have that open and operational, and we’ll see how it operates into the future. Any other projects, I think those were all pretty well wrapped up at the last meeting. I think the final one that’s new is we had kind of a realignment of Hadley and 100th Street on the east side of 100th Street, down in the south part of Cottage Grove. And then down the hill, under the railroad bridge, the realignment of Grey Cloud Trail and 103rd, those are all fully open. So, if you haven’t been down that way this summer, you should check it out because there’s major changes in those areas with those two roads realigning. I don’t think you see that very often in Cottage Grove, projects of that nature, to have two in such a close area, it's definitely a big change, but a huge safety improvement. We got rid of a lot of T intersections, really poor-functioning intersections, and made more of a through-road design, which follows a County plan, actually, because that’s going to be a future County Road going down to Lower Grey Cloud Island. So, we’re happy to have those improvements done as well. I’m kind of thinking from our Water Department, we took bids on a new water tower, which I know I talked about at our project update this summer, and that bid was awarded by the City Council. We have a new water tower that’s going to go along Highway 61, kind of just south of the Park and Ride; that construction will start next spring and be kind of up and running. It will be pretty much built by next fall, but all the painting and getting it operational will be in the spring of 2026. So, it’s a long process to build that water tower, and it kind of changes the skyline down there along the highway I like to say; and it’s a composite water tower so it has a concrete column instead of a steel-painted column like you’d see up at Meadow Grass and 70th, which saves us a lot of money because it’s an amazing expense to paint those water towers. If it’s $5 million to build it, it’s $2 million to paint it, and we can cut that in half by not having to paint that column every 15 years or so. So, we’re excited to get that project underway next year as well. Vice Chair Kath asked is it just me, when 100th Street got done, did the speed limits change a little bit? Because if my memory serves me right, it was 50 MPH all the way, and now it seems like I’ve seen where like half of it down to Andersen Windows, that’s where the 50 and there’s a 40 MPH speed limit there now, too. Director Burfeind replied it’s a good question. So, it is still 50 MPH all the way where it is a straight road, and then with those curves, so we had to build the curves to kind of realign it with 103rd, and right before you enter the curves, it’s a 40 MPH speed limit, which is more consistent with Hadley. So, Hadley and 103rd were always 40 MPH, so it’s more consistent with that. We just weren’t able to build 50 MPH curves, and this is part of the County’s plan, as it really would have made that entire property really Public Services Commission Meeting November 18, 2024 Page 10 of 12 undevelopable. Knowing we had to eventually go down to that 40 MPH before it went down the hill, that was the point where that new speed limit was put in place. Vice Chair Kath said okay, I didn’t know if it was just me, but at least I saw it, so I hope I don’t get a ticket going 50 MPH in a 40, that’s probably not really good getting into that area. I have to admit I’ve driven through there, and it is really nice, it is well done. Director Burfeind said thank you. Street Superintendent Gary Orloff said so down at Public Works today we finished calibration of all of our plow trucks, so hopefully the snow stays away a little yet, we still have some more work to get done. Weather permitting, we pretty much are done sweeping the town, but we still want to go back through the more mature areas again if we can, so the temperatures have to stay above freezing and stop raining. The guys were out staking, you’ll see all those orange stakes put out, so they went out and staked the routes, any kind of high iron manholes, catch basins, any obstructions we fixed. We finished up pothole patching. One thing to remind residents: They can come down to Public Works if they need a few of those stakes for their front yard if they have some areas that may constantly get hit, they can come down to Public Works and we can hand them out. They’re also finishing up tree trimming, anything that’s going to be hitting our dump trucks or sidewalk machines. So, pretty much everybody’s gone through their routes, we’re all ready for winter to begin and start a new season. I have another week of any potholes that may pop up before the plants shut down. Vice Chair Kath asked are we using that same chemical that we used before, that you had explained to us? Gary replied yes, so, with our cold temperatures, we actually are using the treated chemical, we already had 600 tons treated, and we’re actually having it treated at Public Works. Gary asked if there were any other questions; none were asked. Vice Chair Kath thanked Gary. Vice Chair Kath asked Brad if there were any things from the police. Captain Petersen replied yes, I have a few things, as it’s been a few months since I’ve had the opportunity to provide some updates to the commission. As you know, at the beginning of the year, we submitted a new Five-Year Strategic Plan with the help and guidance of the commission. After that was approved, we went hard at work at implementing many of those strategies and plans. I’m happy to report that we’ve made remarkable progress on a lot of that plan, we’re way ahead of where we thought we’d be; we thought many of these things would take a number of years to implement, and there’s probably 90% of that plan that’s complete within one year’s time, which is remarkable. It’s only possible through the support of the commission, the community, Council, and the rest of our leadership. We’re making remarkable progress by nearly every metric. One of those metrics that I like to bring up is our Community Satisfaction Survey, which we call our Police Services Survey. There’s a number of different categories that it measures, but in every one of those categories, we’re achieving over 90% customer satisfaction; in some cases, in fact, most cases, it’s in excess of 95% satisfaction with our services. So, that’s really exciting because we can judge ourselves against whatever arbitrary criteria that we want or we think is important to the community, but it’s most valuable to hear what the community wants and how they think we’re doing. So, that’s probably the metric that I’m most proud of, is to hear that the community is that pleased with our service. As you may know, we got a grant to add a Traffic Safety position, so that’s 100% dedicated to traffic safety, and that’s Officer Lauden Rinzel; he started in that position on October 1, and he’s doing an incredible job. I think at this point he’s got 19 DWIs and countless traffic stops and speed citations, and a lot of public education as well. I know that’s going to make a measurable impact on traffic safety by the end of this time next year. We’re working on our Annual Report right now to gauge our success on our Strategic Plan and evaluate success of a lot of different things that we’ve done. We’re implementing an Annual Report that would be available for public review here soon, so that’s something to look forward to. Our website is going under revision, just starting now, that will be kind of a lengthy process, but we started that. So, we’re really going to be engaging the public here in the next couple months to figure out what they want and need from our website, and we’re eager to make those changes. We’re implementing and evaluating a lot of different technologies; one of those such technologies is an online Crime Report, that went live about a month ago. So, if the citizens don’t know, they now have the opportunity to go to Facebook or our website, find the link, and submit police reports for what I’ll call minor crimes, nuisances, and ordinance issues, those lower level of concerns and problems. Obviously, we don’t want people reporting assaults and arsons and vehicle thefts and things like that, but property damage, ordinance concerns, neighbor complaints, things like that, they’re welcome to go to that link, and submit the online Crime Report. It gives them the opportunity to talk about the incident in a narrative format, lots of dropdowns that are very efficient to describe the nature of the incident; that helps us track and trend those problems. They can also attach things like documents, videos, bank statements, anything that supplements their case can be attached directly to it; so, it’s super efficient, and then at the conclusion of that report, they hit submit, and they’ll get updates periodically as that tracks through Public Services Commission Meeting November 18, 2024 Page 11 of 12 the investigative and documentation process. At the very end, they get an email where they can get a copy of that report or things like that. So, it’s been very successful, we’re looking for that to grow. Captain Petersen said I guess that’s about it, there’s a lot going on, but probably too much to share in this venue. Vice Chair Kath said thank you, Brad. Are there any questions? Commissioner Alden-Rediske said I had a couple questions. The online Crime Report, I’m just hearing about it for the first time right now. It sounds interesting. I understand it’s for lower-level reporting, but who follows up on that, and then has it been used yet? Captain Petersen replied yes, it has been used to a limited extent because this is pretty new, but we’ve fielded probably 25 or 30 Crime Reports at this point; it just went live within the last month. So, as the reports come in, they’re screened by the on-duty sergeants, and the sergeant decides on the most appropriate place for it to get routed, whether it’s a Community Service Officer or a certain officer with certain specialties. From that point, the officer takes a look at it; if they have all the information that they need, they can go ahead and file the report, do whatever needs to be done from there. If they need more information, they’ll contact the citizen or do an investigation, and then once it’s all done, it goes back to the sergeant for approval, and the citizen is kept apprised throughout that process as well. Commissioner Alden-Rediske said okay, thank you, so it’s another avenue for people to report stuff if they’re not comfortable calling a number; it’s kind of like the non-emergency number but online? Captain Petersen replied yes, it’s along those lines. We’re noticing and hearing that people want other options for reporting, it’s not meant to replace our in-person reporting or the non-emergency or telephone reporting, it’s just another option. Some people like to do things from their phone and their computers now. Commissioner Alden-Rediske said I’d like to know where you market that, because I didn’t know anything about it until today, so that’s kind of cool. And then earlier, when you started, you mentioned about a grant, you received a grant, but I didn’t follow what the grant was for. Captain Petersen replied sure. So, the online Crime Report was advertised on Facebook and our website, mentioned in a Council Meeting, I believe, probably a couple other places, too. So, it’s been out there, but by its limited usage, I know that we can do a better job of getting it out there. And, so, the grant was offered through the State’s Traffic Safety grant office, I forget the actual name; it’s the same office that Towards Zero Deaths and all the overtime and those monies come from. It’s a grant to fully fund one officer for one year; all his salary, wages, training, and that’s his sole job is to go out and do traffic. Commissioner Alden-Rediske said and that’s Officer Rinzel? Captain Petersen replied yes. Vice Chair Kath asked staff for a favor, if you could email out our 2025 meeting dates. I was just checking my calendar, and I don’t have it. So, if you could email that out to all the commissioners, then we can get all of our dates; they’re pretty consistent, but obviously they move one day as a new year comes out. So, if you could do that, that would be great. 11. COUNCIL COMMENTS Council Member Dave Thiede said all right, certain things were covered that we did in Council. I might mention that all of the labor contracts have been signed and resolved, I believe, so that’s always good to have done. A couple other things: We approved an updated Ambulance Purchase authorization; we’re kind of going back to the van front instead of the truck, more the truck front. I guess we got a pretty good deal and everything on that, so that’s good. We also approved a new Fire Tender, which needed to be ordered now, as there are long lead times on those things; so, it’s probably not until next year sometime I believe that that Fire Tender would come in. He asked Council Member Justin Olsen if he remembered anything else that we talked about that these folks would be interested in that we approved on Council? Council Member Olsen asked did you guys discuss the budget, do you know where the budget’s at? We do our final budget approvals here coming up; so, if you haven’t talked about that, I can certainly share where we’re at with the budget, but we’re at the end of the process now. Council Member Thiede said and again, I don’t necessarily have it, I’m not going to go into all those numbers for you tonight, but that information is available. As always, we try to hold the increases down as much as possible and such, but I think it’s looking pretty good; there’s different things that we’ve got to talk about this week in a workshop, and the final approval is actually in December, the first meeting in December, I believe. So, that’s probably it. Council Member Thiede asked if the commissioners had any questions for him. Public Services Commission Meeting November 18, 2024 Page 12 of 12 Commissioner Lotts stated I certainly appreciate how forward thinking you guys are, like ordering Fire Tenders, as the lead time is super long. It’s very refreshing, and Brad had mentioned the Strategic Plan and how fast you’re burning through it; that’s amazing to hear as a citizen, like I said, super refreshing. So, thank you. Council Member Thiede replied you’re welcome. I’ve always appreciated our planning efforts and taking a look at different plans and trying to anticipate what could happen in the future. Because a lot of times you get to a certain point in time, and even though something’s not going to happen immediately, you think, well, if we make this decision vs. this decision, and then if this happens up here, you know, this would be the better decision to make in keeping that plan. So, when things kind of mesh together in the future, it’s not necessarily always by accident. So, thank you for that. Vice Chair Kath said the only question I had is maybe it’s more of a Parks Commission session, but with the three questions that we just had on the ballot that didn’t get passed, is there any discussion now by Council what our next steps will be to try to move forward? Will it ever be brought back, or is it too early in the process? I mean, that just happened a week or two ago. Council Member Thiede said well, again, like we were talking about planning; those are kind of some of the things that we feel have some importance in terms of future planning and future benefit for the community. Personally, even though I tend to be a little bit more tight on the money than some others, I imagine people know that, but actually the sales tax would have been a good way to have not just the residents of the City pay for some of those improvements, but I don’t think a lot of people recognized that. So, we’ll be going over a lot of that, saying well, why weren’t we able to communicate some of that to the public a little bit better? But it is, there probably is a plan in terms of, besides the other things we’re looking at for different parks and so forth, of some of the major things that we’d like to be able to do in the future. You know, it just may take longer to get some of it done now. Vice Chair Kath said thank you. Well, if there are no further questions, thanks again for the update. If my colleagues will give me one little pass here, I do want to make one more commission report for you guys that I completely forgot; we probably should have said something at our last meeting, but Kelsey and I both did the public service filming here. Each commission was asked to get a couple volunteers, and they had a little production out here in the Council Chambers, and we got interviewed. I haven’t seen any final product yet, but we’re pretty excited about it, so other commissioners, it should be coming, hopefully; obviously, staff will get to look at it first and then we’ll get to, but I’m certainly humbled at being able to represent our commission. So, if you watch it and you have some feedback for me, I’ve got broad shoulders and I’ll take the feedback, okay? 12. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Alden-Rediske made a motion to adjourn the meeting; Commissioner Jenson seconded. Motion carried: 5-0. The meeting was adjourned at 8:08 p.m. Minutes transcribed by J. Graf and reviewed by Kari Reubish. 1 City Council Action Request 7.D. Meeting Date 2/5/2025 Department Community Development Agenda Category Action Item Title Planning Commission Meeting Minutes (12/16/2024) Staff Recommendation Accept and place on file the minutes from the December 16, 2024, Planning Commission meeting. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. Planning Commission Minutes 2024-12-16 COTTAGE GROVE PLANNING COMMISSION December 16, 2024 12800 Ravine Parkway South Cottage Grove, MN 55016 COUNCIL CHAMBER - 7:00 P.M. The Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission was held in the Council Chamber and telecast on Local Government Cable Channel 16. 1. CALL TO ORDER Frazier called the Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Pradeep Bhat-Here; Ken Brittain-Here; Jessica Fisher-Here; Evan Frazier-Here; Eric Knable-Absent; Derek Rasmussen-Here; Emily Stephens-Here. Members Absent: Eric Knable Staff Present: Emily Schmitz, Community Development Director; Riley Rooney, Associate Planner; Tony Khambata, City Council Liaison 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Fisher made a motion to approve the agenda. Stephens seconded. The motion was approved unanimously (6-to-0 vote). 4. OPEN FORUM Frazier opened the Open Forum and asked if anyone wished to address the Planning Commission on any non -agenda item. No one spoke. Frazier closed the Open Forum. 5. CHAIR’S EXPLANATION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS Frazier explained the purpose of the Planning Commission, which serves in an advisory capacity to the City Council, and that the City Council makes all final decisions. In addition, he explained the process of conducting a public hearing and requested that any person wishing to speak should go to the podium and state their full name and address for the public record. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND APPLICATIONS A. Brockman ICUP Extension - Case ICUP2024-025 Brockman Land, LLC has applied for an extension to the Interim Conditional Use Permit (Resolution 2015-085) at 10870 Ideal Avenue South to allow for the continuance of existing site operations until such time any adjacent property use is proposed which aligns with the guided land use in the Comprehensive Plan . Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommend that the City Council extend the Interim Conditional Use Permit (ICUP) at 10870 Ideal Avenue South to allow for the continuance of existing site operations until such time any adjacent property use is proposed, which aligns with the guided Land Use in the Comprehensive Plan. Planning Commission Minutes - Regular Meeting December 16, 2024 Page 2 of 4 Rooney summarized the staff report and recommended approval subject to the conditions stipulated in the staff report. Frazier asked if there were any questions for staff. Frazier said the last ICUP, then, was a 10-year grant; is there a reason why this one is not a term limited and rather is just based on whenever development happens on a different plot? Rooney replied we wanted to just ensure that at that time it does expire, it makes sense to do so. If we were to set another 10-year period, let’s say those properties aren’t ready at that time either, then we’d kind of be going through the work all over again, not necessarily that that’s bad, but the idea is that once those properties are ready, it’s good to go. I don't know if Schmitz has anything to add off of that. Frazier said I guess my thought and my concern in going over the packet was is a grant of an ICUP with an indeterminate time period is kind of defeating the purpose of an ICUP, because it’s supposed to be a time limited, very limited ability to use the property that we should be able to review fairly often. But does it also then make it more difficult for the surrounding properties to develop because this use is ongoing? Rooney replied I don’t know if Schmitz wants to touch on that a little more because she has some background, I think. Schmitz replied you can certainly add a condition that does include a sunset date, perhaps it’s 10 years again, and we can revisit it in front of the Planning Commission and City Council. However, leaving it at such time the area redevelops, it helps it ki nd of all redevelop together, for lack of a better way to put it. So, we can certainly add a sunset date as opposed to leaving it open -ended; it’s up to you as the Planning Commission. Frazier said okay, I just didn’t know if there were thoughts on if my concern is well founded, or if staff said no, we thought about that and we’re not concerned about it, so, all right. Brittain said so, if I remember correctly, a time for termination is normal, but is it also just a normal implementation of the ICUP to have a triggering condition, such as when the land develops? And is that typically the two things, or are there more optio ns? Schmitz replied an ICUP is intended to be limited to whether it’s a timeframe, whether it’s a triggering event, whatever that might look like. To Rooney’s point in her presentation, a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) runs with the land, and we have no ab ility to kind of revoke that right. So, that ICUP allows us to put that condition on there for it to end at such time we see the area start to redevelop. Brittain said okay, thank you. Stephens asked what’s the definition of the other properties being ready to develop? Because as I understand, people can be ready to develop, and things can come and go, and it can go on forever. So, how are you like navigating the concrete when are they ready to develop; what does that mean? Rooney replied that’s a good question. Our definition would essentially be at such time that any of those properties were to sell and be sold to a developer to then, in turn, create residential development; t hat would trigger that finalization of the ICUP should you approve that this evening and it be approved by the City Council as well. Stephens asked so, is it the sale, or putting it up for sale; like, is there a specific? Rooney replied the specific is probably it. Schmitz stated ultimately, we want the trigger to be for sale or a planning application, which would align those properties with our current guided Land Use, so, R-3 residential. So, at such time we receive a planning application for that area to redevelop in that manner would be the trigger. Stephens said okay, thank you. Frazier said so the language in Condition #5 in the Recommendation talks about a surrounding use terminating and then the parcel being proposed to be in compliance with the legal conformity; so, that’s the actual legal language that would go in, b ut Planning staff would interpret that as someone who has put the property up for sale to a development or its actually been sold to a developer. Rooney replied that is correct. Fisher asked so once an adjacent property does sell, what kind of notice do you have to give the owner of this property we’re talking about? Do you say hey, we’re done, your ICUP is gone; I mean, is there some sort of, like do they have a year to? I d on't know, I guess I feel like, okay, so someth ing adjacent goes, then what? Brittain told Fisher it says right here; Fisher said, oh, 90 days, I don’t know how I missed that. Rooney said it’s a good question to clarify, not to worry. Khambata said I don’t normally interject, but I’ve got one quick question regarding the 2050 Comprehensive Plan that we’re going to start working on here. So, if the Land Use in the Comprehensive Plan changes when we adopt the 2050 Comprehensive Plan, how does that affect the landowners approval? So, say the Planning Commission were to change the guided Land Use in the Comprehensive Plan as a whole, how would this apply to the updated Land Use guidance? Schmitz replied we would need to revisit. I don’t anticipate the 2050 Comprehensive Plan will address the Land Use guidance for this particular area ; recognizing that it certainly could, we would have to revisit what that redevelopment looks like. Bhat said I have two questions. What’s on the north side of this site? What’s that currently? Rooney asked the other side or just either north and south? Bhat replied just north of this property. Rooney replied so , just south is the junkyard, and north I believe Planning Commission Minutes - Regular Meeting December 16, 2024 Page 3 of 4 is Rumpca Excavating, so it’s currently an excavating company. Bhat asked, so, when we say adjacent property, does it have to be those two properties or it can be across the street, too? Rooney replied I guess this is residential already, so here, her e, and then the property across the street has already been developed; this is our Public Works building and then the Low -Zone Water Treatment Plant is down here. So, it’d just be these adjacent properties to the north and south. Bhat said okay, thank you. Brittain asked how would that happen if you had to revisit it with the underlying zoning changing? What’s the process v ersus maybe changing some of this terminology to somehow reference the Comprehensive Plan? Schmitz replied I would anticipate if the underlying Land Use were to adjust, it would adjust perhaps more to an industrial use, right? Just using my planning brai n and thinking okay, we’ve got the Business Park, that would only be the likely other option; and if that is the case, the use then actually more aligns with an Industrial District type use. Therefore, the use would continue on as is, there wouldn’t necessarily need to be that trigger to adjust. Frazier said again, we’re kind of going down the rabbit hole over here, but this is probably a little speculative; you said h ighly unlikely, it would change more towards an industrial. I think I would agree with that probably just because there are residential nearby, and I know you guys as planners don’t like putting industrial next to residential. I think there’s also a higher vote that Council has to meet in order to change a property from Residential to Industrial, so it’s unlikely to say that this would change that far in the 2050 Comprehensive Plan. Schmitz said it certainly could, but again, from a planning perspective, we do like to try and have a little bit of those buffers in between kind of those longstanding residential uses and new development. Frazier said, actually, I will ask one more question. If I was going to push you and say I really want year s on here, instead of another triggering condition, would staff recommend another 10 -year period? Rooney replied I would say 10 years, I think, is more than sufficient; if you wanted to put a timeline on it, that is something that we would add to the end of the Recommendation to bring forward to City Council, if that’s something you’re interested in. Frazier said thank you. Brittain said if that were something that was desirable by the group, would it be possible to have a whichever happens first ? Where if the residential development happens, boom, you’re done, or in 10 years, we’re going to revisit it and we can see what’s changed? Schmitz replied your motion this evening can certainly include an amendment to that condition to do whichever happens first. Frazier asked if there were any further questions for staff; none were asked. He asked if the applicant would like to approac h and add anything additional. Tim Brockman, from Brockman Land, said I really don’t have anything more to add. I think what she said was what we are lookin g for, just a way to stay in there. It doesn’t make sense for us to sell one small area, but when everybody else develops, we’r e more than willing. We know how that works, so, we’ll be willing to move on then ; and a 10-year extension, that would be sufficient. So, thank you for your time. Frazier asked if there were any questions for the applicant , none were asked. Frazier told Brockman thank you very much for being here. Frazier opened the public hearing. No one spoke. Frazier closed the public hearing. Frazier asked if there was any further discussion by the commission. Rasmussen said I think I agree with your timeline, a 10-year sunset period just seems like it gives it a definite end. If this is going to develop, and we’re sure the north and south will develop with it, probably as one. So, I’m pretty comfortable with how it’s written with the sale of the property or 10 years, whichever comes first. I like that. Frazier said yeah, and that was kind of my thought coming in, so I’m glad Brittain asked that question, just to be definite, that we could do that, but I think it’s worthwhile being able to come back and review this in a time period certain . If it doesn’t, then they can continue to exist, but then it also gives us the out to end it early if those properties start to develop ; and it makes sense to be a residential area instead of us having to stay with the 10 years. So, I think the suggestion that we do either a development or a 10-year period, whichever occurs first, I think is something that should be appropriate here. Planning Commission Minutes - Regular Meeting December 16, 2024 Page 4 of 4 Brittain made a motion to approve the Interim Conditional Use Permit (ICUP) extension, subject to the conditions stipulated in the staff report, with the addition that the ICUP will either terminate at the 10-year mark, or when the adjacent properties develop, whichever occurs first. Fisher seconded. Motion passed unanimously (6-to-0 vote). 7. APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 25, 2024 Brittain made a motion to approve the minutes of the November 25, 2024, Planning Commission meeting. Bhat seconded. Motion passed unanimously (6-to-0 vote). 8. REPORTS A. RECAP OF DECEMBER CITY COUNCIL MEETING Schmitz stated given our early meeting this month, we’ve only got one Council Meeting to recap, on December 4, 2024; she provided a summary of actions from that meeting. Schmitz said with that, I will pass it over to Council Member Khambata. Khambata said this will be my last as Council Liaison to the Planning Commission, so I want to take this opportunity to again share my appreciation with all of you for the time that you devote to this. I know it’s not easy work, especially when we have big, thick packets, it’s sometimes hard to see the value in what you do; but especially coming from the Planning Commission and being on the Council, the work that you guys do is invaluable to the City, so thank you. And I wish we had more short meetings like this. I’ll be continuing on in some form or capacity with the City, but not on City Council, starting in January. So, I hope to see you guys around, and I’ll make myself available for any questions if you have any for me. Frazier said thank you; are there any questions for Council Member Khambata? None were asked. Frazier said, Tony, I’ll return the thanks to you. I know we started together on the Planning Commission, and I know you always worked very hard in this position, in this role, just as a member and then as Chair. I know with moving up to the City Council, I know you’ve always had the City in mind, in doing what’s best. So, thank you for all of your work for the City as well. Khamb ata said thank you. B. RESPONSE TO PLANNING COMMISSION INQUIRIES Frazier said I think we had one at the last meeting that we had answered at the meeting. C. PLANNING COMMISSION REQUESTS Frazier said I just have one; so, the Preserve.Play.Prosper, that plan obviously was not agreed to by the voters in the November election. I thought Dockter, when he did the presentation to us, said that the CIP may change, depending on the results of that referendum. Is that something that we’re going to see within the next couple months, an amendment to that, or do you know a timeline? Schmitz replied I anticipate early in the year, in 2025, we’ll revisit what that CIP looks like; those funding opportunities changed, obviously, with that Preserve.Play.Prosper referendum not passing. 9. ADJOURNMENT Rasmussen made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Stephens seconded. Motion passed unanimously (6-to-0 vote). The meeting was adjourned at 7:25 p.m. 1 City Council Action Request 7.E. Meeting Date 2/5/2025 Department Community Development Agenda Category Action Item Title Approval of Rental Licenses Staff Recommendation Approval the issuance of rental licenses to the properties listed in the attached table. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. Rental License Approvals CC Memo 2. Rental License Approvals Table TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator FROM: Samantha Drewry, Code Enforcement Officer DATE: January 30, 2025 RE: Rental License Approvals Background/Discussion Rental licenses are required for nonowner-occupied residential properties (City Code Title 9-13, Property Maintenance, and Title 9 -14, Rental Licensing) and are issued on a biennial basis. The licensing process includes submittal of the rental license application, payment of $180, and public criminal history report. Rental inspections are conducted on all rental properties as part of the licensing process. Once all information has been sub - mitted and the inspection satisfactorily completed, the Council must approve the license prior to it being issued. The properties listed in the attached table have completed the licensing process and are ready to have their licenses issued following Council approval. Recommendation Approve the issuance of rental licenses to the properties in the attached table. 2025 RENTAL LICENSES CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL - FEBRUARY 5, 2025 RENTAL LICENSE NUMBER PROPERTY STREET #PROPERTY STREET NAME PROPERTY OWNER RENT-002640 6524 Genevieve Trail South Aarthi Saminathan/Anandamoorthy Thirumoorthy RENT-001521-8989 92nd Street South Amy LaCroix RENT-002651 8203 Joliet Avenue South Anh Pham RENT-002649 6792 Meadow Grass Lane S Chuck Li RENT-002673 9801 78th Street South Deborah Spinner RENT-001598-8489 Grafton Avenue South Eileen Poussard RENT-002680 7013 Homestead Avenue South Joseph Baumann RENT-001690-8191 Jensen Avenue South Kevin Spuhler RENT-001604-6992 Pine Crest Trail South Mark Stevenson RENT-002678 6110 Lamar Avenue South NeuShine LLC RENT-002570 6817 Pine Crest Trail South Vincent Burger, 6817 Pine Crest LLC 1 City Council Action Request 7.F. Meeting Date 2/5/2025 Department Public Safety Agenda Category Action Item Title Towing and Impounding of Vehicles Service Agreement Staff Recommendation Authorize executing a service agreement for towing and impounding of vehicles with South East Towing, Inc. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. Service Agreement for Towing and Impounding Vehicles January 28 2025 2. South East Towing Clean Vers(Towing Contract 2025-2027) To:Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From:Peter J Koerner, Director of Public Safety Date:January 28, 2025 Subject: TOWING AND IMPOUNDING OF VEHICLES SERVICE AGREEMENT INTRODUCTION South East Towing, Inc. has serviced Cottage Grove Public Safety since the 1990’s delivering excellent service. The current towing contract is due for renewal, and we solicited bids from two local vendors, South East Towing, Inc. and Absolute Towing & Recovery, Inc. Both companies met the requirements for response time, towing capabilities, secure storage, etc. Both companies gave similar costs for tows and there were differences in additional services but not substantial. Most of the tows we utilize are basic tows and South East Towing, Inc. is lightly lower. Absolute Towing South East Towing Basic Tow (Type I-V)$125.00 $115.00 Heavy Towing (Type VII)$400.00 Per Hour $300.00 Per Hour Clean Up $25.00 $15.00 Winch $75.00 $75.00 Dolly $0 $25.00 Complimentary Towing for Department Vehicles Yes No Free Scrap/"Junk" Vehicles for Training Yes Yes Call Response 20 Minutes Yes Yes 24 hours 7 Days Per Week Yes Yes Two Towing Vehicles On Call Most Yes Absolute Towing & Recovery, Inc. offered complimentary towing and service for department vehicles. Both companies offered complementary junk vehicles for public safety training. Command staff reviewed bids and recommend continuing our service agreement with South East Towing, Inc. The service agreement was reviewed, updated, and approved by Attorney Aaron Price. The service agreement will be effective from February 5, 2025, and terminating December 31, 2027. RECOMMENDATION Authorize executing a service agreement for towing and impounding of vehicles with South East Towing, Inc. CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR TOWING AND IMPOUNDING OF VEHICLES This Agreement, made between the City of Cottage Grove, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as “City”, and South East Towing, Inc., 7401 Dickman Trail, Inver Grove Heights, MN 55076, hereinafter referred to as “Contractor” do hereby agree as follows: 1. Purpose. This service agreement is to provide for the towing and impoundment of passenger cars, trucks, motorcycles and snowmobiles within the City of Cottage Grove, on a 24-hour basis. 2. Term. This service agreement shall be effective 01/01/2025 and terminate 12/31/27. 3. Equipment/Manpower/Services. This Contractor shall have the equipment, and provide the manpower and services pursuant to this service agreement as specified in this section. a. The Contractor shall own a minimum of two towing vehicles with a minimum capacity of five (5) tons. b. Each towing vehicle shall be equipped in accordance with Minnesota Statute, section 169.64, and inspected by the Minnesota Department of Transportation on an annual basis with certification provided to the City. c. The Contractor shall be available for towing services twenty-four (24) hours a day, seven (7) days per week. d. The Contractor shall arrive at the scene of the tow within the following time limits: for a daytime request, within 20 minutes after the request for services is received; for a nighttime request, within 15 minutes after the request for services is received. e. The Contractor shall be able to provide towing services for automobiles, light trucks, snowmobiles, motorcycles and other specially designed vehicles. Contractor shall also have the ability to provide special towing services, including: winching, dollies, flat bed, light rescue, etc. Contractor shall also have equipment with 30,000 pound under-reach capabilities. Towing charges shall be divided into seven types as follows: Type I: Towing of standard-sized vehicles Type II: Towing of vehicles from accident scenes Type III: Truck-type vehicles with a capacity exceeding one ton Page | 2 Type IV: Tows that require an unusual amount of winching and/or use of dolly Type V: Tows that require the use of a flat bed Type VI: Cottage Grove Public Safety tows Type VII: Tows requiring an unusual rescue effort or which needs specialized removal equipment shall be subject to a negotiated price between the owner of said vehicle and the tow company f. The Contractor shall assume all liability for the vehicles to be towed. g. The Contractor shall be responsible for cleanup of debris at the scene. h. The Contractor shall maintain the insurance coverage outlined in Section 5. i. Contractors shall have access to a secured, 24-hour impound facility, which must be consistent with the applicable zoning laws. Further, the Contractor must provide to the City a scale drawing of the facility, along with proof that the facility itself complies with the applicable zoning laws. 4. Towing, storage and administration fees. a. The storage fees shall be charged on the basis of each 24 -hour period commencing after the time of arrival of the towed vehicle at the impound facility. The storage rate shall be as follows (including sales tax): Year 1 (January 1, 2025 thru December 31, 2025): First day storage fee (from arrival at facility to first 24 hours): $35.00 Every 24 hours thereafter (or part of if released prior to 24 hours): $35.00 Year 2 (January 1, 2026 thru December 31, 2026): First day storage fee (from arrival at facility to first 24 hours): $35.00 Every 24 hours thereafter (or part of if released prior to 24 hours): $35.00 Year 3 (January 1, 2027 thru December 31, 2027): First day storage fee (from arrival at facility to first 24 hours): $35.00 Every 24 hours thereafter (or part of if released prior to 24 hours): $35.00 b. If owners of vehicles impounded for violations of or in conjunction with arrests of Minnesota Statute, section 169A.20 (Driving While Impaired), fails to provide Contractor with the requisite proof of ownership, valid driving privileges and insurance pursuant to Minnesota Statute, section Page | 3 169A.42, by 6:00 p.m., Contractor may store the vehicle overnight and charge the vehicle owner for another storage day. c. The towing and impound service fees charged by the Contractor shall be as follows (including sales tax): Year 1 (January 1, 2025 through December 31, 2025): Type Basic Fee Additional Total Type I $115.00 $115.00 Type II $115.00 $15.00 (clean-up) $130.00 Type III $150.00 $25.00 (drive line) $175.00 Type IV $115.00 $75.00 (winching) $190.00 $25.00 (dolly) $140.00 $15.00 (clean-up) $130.00 Type V $115.00 $15.00 (clean-up) $130.00 Type VI $30.00 $30.00 Type VII $300.00/Hour $300.00/Hour Year 2 (January 1, 2026 thru December 31, 2026): Type Basic Fee Additional Total Type I $125.00 $125.00 Type II $125.00 $15.00 (clean-up) $140.00 Type III $175.00 $25.00 (drive line) $200.00 Type IV $125.00 $75.00 (winching) $200.00 $25.00 (dolly) $150.00 $15.00 (clean-up) $140.00 Type V $125.00 $15.00 (clean-up) $140.00 Type VI $30.00 $30.00 Type VII $300.00/Hour $300.00/Hour Year 3 (January 1, 2027 thru December 31, 2027) Type I $125.00 $125.00 Type II $125.00 $15.00 (clean-up) $140.00 Type III $175.00 $25.00 (drive line) $200.00 Type IV $125.00 $75.00 (winching) $200.00 $25.00 (dolly) $150.00 $15.00 (clean-up) $140.00 Type V $125.00 $15.00 (clean-up) $140.00 Type VI $30.00 $30.00 Type VII $300.00/Hour $300.00/Hour d. Administrative fees may be charged on vehicles impounded for periods exceeding five (5) days. The administrative fees must be reasonable and represent actual costs incurred by the Contractor to notify the owners of Page | 4 impounded vehicles. Upon demand, the Contractor must provide to the City documentation justifying charging the fees. e. All charges for towing and storage shall be secured by a lien against the vehicles impounded, and carried on account until the City makes sale or other proper disposition of such vehicles. If the receipts from such sale or other disposition are not sufficient to pay the cost of the towing and storage charges after the deduction of the costs of such sale or disposition, any excess shall be paid by the Contractor, first toward net towing charges and then toward net storage charges as otherwise would be earned by the Contractor, and the balance of the towing and storage charges shall be canceled. If the receipts from such sale or other disposition are not sufficient to pay the costs of such sale or other disposition, all charges for towing and storage shall be canceled. f Notice to Owner. The Contractor must provide a written statement from the City explaining computation of fees to each vehicle owner when the owner claims the vehicle. The City may update the statement at its discretion. g. The Contractor shall be solely responsible for all matters relating to the operation of said impound facility and shall indemnify and hold the City harmless in connection therewith and shall comply with the following criteria: (1) The impound facility shall be located within ten (10) minutes of the City of Cottage Grove, and must be able to accommodate at least thirty (30) vehicles. (2) The impound facility must have a locked and fenced lot, with a minimum of an 8-foot fence. The lot must conform to all applicable codes and ordinances. (3) The impound facility shall be available daily 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. to allow for the release of impounded vehicles. (4) The provider of towing services to the City must have access to an impound facility twenty-four (24) hours a day. (5) A record shall be made at the time vehicles arrive at the impound lot as to the vehicle’s condition, and an inventory of the vehicle’s valuable contents. (6) The Contractor must make an attempt to contact the listed owner of any unclaimed vehicle within seven (7) days of the initial tow of the vehicle. Contractor shall maintain documentation of each contact Page | 5 with the vehicle’s owner and shall make said documentation available upon request to the Cottage Grove Department of Public Safety. (7) All records and documentation in regards to the Cottage Grove Department of Public Safety towing services shall be made available to Department of Public Safety personnel upon request. (8) The Contractor must advise the Cottage Grove Department of Public Safety when a vehicle is released. Such notification will be made immediately by telephone, and monthly in writing on forms prescribed by the Public Safety Department. The forms shall include, but are not limited to, the documentation of all fees charged. The Contractor shall provide printed record of all vehicles towed on a monthly basis. Said records shall contain no less than the following data: a. Date vehicle was towed b. Vehicle license number (VIN number in absence of license plate) c. Vehicle year d. Vehicle make e. Location the vehicle was towed from f. Status of vehicle (released, junked, auctioned, still in impound) g. To whom the vehicle was released (driver’s license number will suffice) The Contractor shall provide to the Cottage Grove Police Department a printed record of all vehicles towed from the effective date of the towing service agreement through the end of the most current month. Said record shall contain all the same information as the monthly record but shall also contain totals identifying: a. Number of vehicles still in impound b. Number of vehicles seized c. Number of vehicles released d. Number of vehicles auctioned e. Number of vehicles junked f. Total number of vehicles towed Said printed records shall be in receipt of the Cottage Grove Police Department Administrative Division no later than the 10th working day of the following month. Page | 6 (9) The Contractor must require and receive proof of the ownership and proof of current insurance from the vehicle owner prior to releasing any vehicle. In addition, the Contractor shall check the Public Safety Impound Record for any police holds on the vehicle. No vehicle may be released until all police holds have been removed. (10) No storage charges shall be made by the Contractor when the towed vehicle is not brought to the Contractor’s impound facility. (11) The Contractor shall notify the Department of Public Safety in writing of all alleged damage to vehicles, and loss of personal property of towed vehicles. (12) The Contractor shall be responsible for the disposition of all Department of Public Safety-directed, unclaimed towed vehicles. (13) All unclaimed vehicles, which are to be sold, must be held by the Contractor for a minimum of ninety (90) days. (14) If a towed vehicle is not claimed during the holding period, it may be sold at Public Auction between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The sale must occur in the County where the impound facility is located. a. Procedure for Sale. Notice stating the time and place of the sale, the amount due on the date of the sale (not including expenses of advertising and sale), reason for lien against the vehicle, and general description of the vehicle shall be served upon the owner of said vehicle. b. Method of Service of Notice. Notice must be served personally if the owner resides in Washington County. If the owner is not a resident of Washington County, the above notice must be published once per week for three (3) weeks in a Washington County newspaper. The last published notice must be dated at least one (1) week prior to the date of the sale. If the post office address of the owner is unknown, public notice is sufficient. c. Sale proceeds from unclaimed vehicles shall be distributed as follows: 1. Expenses of the sale and advertising. 2. Expenses, if any, owed by the towing or impound provider to a third person, such as: storage charges & maintenance fees. Page | 7 3. Charges and fees of the towing/impound operator 4. The balance, if any, to the owner or another lien holder of the vehicle. 5. The Contractor shall be solely responsible for the disposal of any abandoned vehicle as defined by Minnesota Statute, section 168B.03. Any abandoned vehicles shall be disposed of by the Contractor in accordance with Minnesota Statute, section 168B.09. (15) The City shall not be responsible for requests for towing services, which are canceled prior to arrival of the towing vehicle. (16) No vehicle shall be towed under this service agreement without specific authorization from the City. (17) All vehicles shall be towed (not driven), without damage to said vehicle, to the above-referenced impound facility. No vehicle shall be towed under this service agreement without specific authorization from the City. (18) The Contractor will be held responsible for the loss of or damage to, the vehicle, equipment thereon, and contents from the time they, or their agent, signs the receipts for the vehicle provided by the Cottage Grove Public Safety Department. The Contractor shall take all precautions necessary to protect the public against injury and will defend and hold the City harmless from all towing and storage of vehicles as provided hereunder, and in the service agreement relating thereto. 5. Insurance. The Contractor shall maintain commercial general liability coverage at $1,000,000 per occurrence with a general aggregate of $2,000,000, automobile liability coverage at $1,000,000 combined single limit, and umbrella liability coverage at $2,000,000 each occurrence with an aggregate of $2,000,000. The City must be named as an additional insured on all insurance policies referenced herein. Contractor may not cancel any insurance policy where the City is listed as an additional insured party without first providing written notice to the City. Failure to maintain the insurance required by this Section shall entitle the City to terminate this service agreement. 6. Performance. In all cases where the Contractor fails to respond to any call for tow trucks within twenty (20) minutes, the Department of Public Safety shall have the right to call other providers to perform towing services, and the Contractor shall pay to the City any costs of towing expenses incurred by the City to the extent they exceed the price provided by the service Page | 8 agreement. 7. Non-Discriminatory Practices. The Contractor shall not during the life of the service agreement, discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, sex, creed, national origin or ancestry. The Contractor shall include similar provisions in all subcontracts entered into for the performance of this service agreement. The City reserves the right to cancel or terminate this service agreement and any money due or to become due hereunder may be forfeited, for a second or subsequent violation of the terms and conditions of this paragraph. This paragraph is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statute, Section 181.59, Minnesota Department of Human Rights; Minnesota Statute 363.00 inclusive of Section 363.073 (Certificates of Compliance for Public Contracts) and applicable Federal Civil Rights Acts. 8. Indemnification. The Contractor shall take all necessary steps to protect the public against injury in the performance of this service agreement. The Contractor shall indemnify, defend, and hold the City harmless from any and all claims or damages, including the costs and attorney’s fees incurred to defend any claim for damages, which the Contractor has alleged to have caused arising out of the performance of this service agreement. Contractor shall indemnify City against legal liability for damages arising out of claims by Contractor’s employees. City shall indemnify Contractor against legal liability for damages arising out of claims by City’s employees. Bonds and Insurance. The Contractor shall secure and maintain all bonds and insurance policies required by the service agreement. 9. Termination. This service agreement may be terminated by either party upon thirty (30) days’ written notice delivered to the other party at the addresses listed above. Upon termination under this provision, if there is no default by the Contractor, Contractor shall be paid for services rendered and reimbursable expenses incurred until the effective date of termination. This service agreement may be terminated by either party upon written notice in the event of substantial failure by the other party to perform in accordance with the terms of this service agreement. The non -performing party shall have fifteen (15) calendar days from the date of the termination notice to cure of submit a plan for cure that is acceptable to the other party. 10. Subcontractors. Contractor shall not enter into subcontracts for any of the services provided in this service agreement without the express written Page | 9 consent of the City, unless specifically provided for herein. Contractor shall pay any subcontractor involved in the performance of this service agreement within ten (10) days of the Contractor’s receipt of payment by the City for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. 11. Delay in Performance. Neither City nor Contractor shall be considered in default of this service agreement for delays in performance caused by circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the nonperforming party. For purposes of this service agreement, such circumstances include, but are not limited to, abnormal weather conditions; floods; earthquakes; fire; epidemics; war, riots, and other civil disturbances; strikes, lockouts, work slowdowns, and other labor disturbances; sabotage; judicial restraint; and inability to procure permits, licenses or authorizations from any local, state, or federal agency for any of the supplies, materials, accesses, or services required to be provided by either City or Contractor under this service agreement. If such circumstances occur, the nonperforming party shall, within a reasonable time of being prevented from performing, give written notice to the other party describing the circumstances preventing continued performance and the efforts being ma de to resume performance of this service agreement. Consultant will be entitled to payment for its reasonable additional charges, if any, due to the delay. 12. Ownership of Documents. Professional documents, drawings, and specifications prepared by Contractor as part of the services performed under this service agreement shall become the property of the City when Contractor has been compensated for all services rendered, provided, however, that Contractor shall have the unrestricted right to their use. Contractor shall retain its rights in its standard drawing details, specifications, databases, computer software, and other proprietary property. Rights to proprietary intellectual property developed, utilized, or modified in the performance of the services shall remain the property of the Contractor. 13. Independent Contractor Status. All services provided by Contractor, its officers, agents and employees pursuant to this services agreement shall be provided as employees of Contractor or as independent contractors of Contractor and not as employees of the City for any purpose. 14. General Provisions. a. Assignment. This service agreement is not assignable without the mutual written agreement of the parties. b. Waiver. A waiver by either City or Contractor of any breach of this services agreement shall be in writing. Such a waiver shall Page | 10 not affect the waiving party’s rights with respect to any other or further breach. c. Governing Law. This services agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota and any action must be venued in Washington County District Court. d. Amendments. Any modification or amendment to this services agreement shall require a written agreement signed by both parties. e. Severability. If any term of this services agreement is found to be void or invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the remaining terms of this services agreement, which shall continue in full force and effect. f. Data Practices Compliance. All data collected by the City pursuant to this services agreement shall be subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13. g. Entire Agreement. This services agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes all prior communications, understandings and agreements relating to the subject matter hereof, whether oral or written. [The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank] Page | 11 SOUTH EAST TOWING, INC. ________________________________ Authorized Signature Date ________________________________ Title Page | 12 CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE _________________________________ Myron Bailey, Mayor _________________________________ Date _________________________________ Tamara Anderson, City Clerk _________________________________ Date 1 City Council Action Request 7.G. Meeting Date 2/5/2025 Department Public Works Agenda Category Action Item Title Receive Fuel Pricing for 2025 Staff Recommendation Receive the 2025 State Fuel Contract pricing under State Contract number 263096. Budget Implication Pricing is within budget. Attachments 1. Receive Fuel Pricing 2025 To:Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From:Ryan Burfeind, Public Works Director Adam Moshier, Fleet and Facilities Manager Date:January 29th, 2025 Re:Receive Fuel Pricing for 2025 Background Each year, staff submits fuel quantities to the state to be involved in the fixed and spot pricing fuel contract. Participating in this contract assists with budgeting fuel expenses and guarantees a price on fuel for the year regardless of the market. Discussion The City requested the following fuel quantities for 2025: Diesel B5 Winter 16,400 gallons B20 13,800 gallons Unleaded 87 Octane 70,800 gallons The state negotiated pricing for 2025 is as follows: Diesel B5 Winter $2.7087 per gallon B20 $2.7849 per gallon Unleaded 87 Octane $2.2175 per gallon The vendor will be Mansfield Oil Company. The new contract number will be 263096. Effective date is 02/01/2025. Budget The 2025 budget has $3.50 per gallon for fuel including taxes. This pricing is within the budget. Recommendation It is recommended the City Council receive the fuel pricing for 2025 under state contract number 263096. 1 City Council Action Request 7.H. Meeting Date 2/5/2025 Department Public Works Agenda Category Action Item Title Sale of Surplus Property Staff Recommendation Authorize Public Works to advertise and sell surplus property on Cranky Ape and/or MNBid. Budget Implication NA Attachments 1. Cranky Ape 2025 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From: Adam Moshier, Facilities and Fleet Maintenance Manager Date:January 29th, 2025 RE:Sale of Surplus Property Introduction Public Works is requesting this property be sold. This equipment was replaced in 2024 and 2025. Unit Number Equipment Asset Number 41-8504-15 Toro 4100 Mower 3934 41-7013-05 2005 Trailer Redi Haul 3044 31-8601-97 Elgin Pelican Street Sweeper 2126 31-8501-15 Exmark Stand up Mower 3933 Requested Action Authorize Public Works to advertise and sell surplus property on Cranky Ape and/or MNBid. 1 City Council Action Request 7.I. Meeting Date 2/5/2025 Department Public Works Agenda Category Action Item Title Utility & Engineering Building Change Order #5 Staff Recommendation Approve Change Order #5 for the Utility and Engineering Building in the amount of $23,993.66. Budget Implication $23,993.66 in dedicated project contingency funds, funded through Water and Sewer Utility Funds. Attachments 1. CGUE_Kraus-Anderson CORs January 2025_Combined_REVISED 1-29-2025 Kraus-Anderson Construction 501 South 8th Street Minneapolis, MN 55404 Phone: (612) 332-7281 Web: www.krausanderson.com January 29, 2025 Ryan Burfeind, PE Public Works Director City of Cottage Grove 12800 Ravine Parkway South Cottage Grove, MN 55016 Re: Change Order Requests for January 2025 City of Cottage Grove Utility & Engineering Building 10795 Ideal Avenue South Cottage Grove, Minnesota Dear Mr. Burfeind, We respectfully submit the following change order requests (COR) for approval at the Cottage Grove City Council meeting on February 5, 2025: • COR #29 – $993.90 o PCO 75, PR #18 – Add drywall soffit over exterior door A115A per PR #18. • COR #30 – $1,109.49 o PCO 105 – Locker adjustments to shelving at City request. • COR #31 – $20,713.93 o PCO 100, PR #19 – Adding card readers and door hardware changes per PR #19. • COR #32 – $426.00 o PCO 102 – Remobilization for Knox box install. Masonry damage repair back charge. • COR #33 – $750.34 o PCO 110 – Adding almond-color pedestals (6) at front of locker room benches for support. In addition to the COR’s listed above, the following changes will be at no cost (net $0 change) to the owner: • PCO 104 – $892.50 cost from WS 06A (Ebert). Cost backcharged to WS 09K contract (Steinbrecher). o Stainless steel cabinet doors hit and damaged by Steinbrecher lift. This cost is for supply & install of two replacement doors and hardware. The COR’s noted above combine to a net added cost to the project of $23,993.66. The remaining construction contingency (orig. $470,000) less pending COR #32 is $459,511.44. The remaining owner’s contingency (orig. $214,000) less pending COR #29, COR #30, COR #31, and COR #33, is $125.756.61. Page 2 To have questions answered or schedule a time to meet and discuss the attached COR’s further, please contact Ben Albrecht at 763.401.2465 (ben.albrecht@krausanderson.com). Sincerely, Kraus-Anderson Construction Ben Albrecht Assistant Project Manager Kraus-Anderson Construction cc: Lee Mann, Stantec Dan Kjellberg, Kraus-Anderson Construction Rachel Struckman, Kraus-Anderson Construction Change Order Request Project: Cottage Grove, MN 55016 10875 Ideal Ave S City of Cottage Grove New Utility & Engineering Building 2310312-COR # 29.00 Date:1/2/2025 Cottage Grove, MN 55016 To: Owner From: Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Minneapolis, MN 55404 501 South Eighth Street City Of Cottage Grove 12800 Ravine Parkway South Description: Adding a new soffit in Room A115. AmountItem #Description Vendor PCO # 75 - Wold PR #18: Room A115 Soffit 1 $993.90 Add bulkhead over door A115A per Wold PR #18.Commercial Drywall, Inc. 2 $0.00 No cost change per Wold PR #18.Twin City Acoustics, Inc. 3 $0.00 No cost change per Wold PR #18.Steinbrecher Painting Company $993.90 Total For Change Order Signed: ____________________________Approved By: Submitted By: Date: __________________ Signed: ____________________________Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Date: __________________ Accepted By: Wold Architects & Engineers Signed: ____________________________Date: __________________ City Of Cottage Grove DATE JOB NAME PROJECT MANAGER QTY DESCRIPTION SIZE UNIT PRICE AMOUNT ROOM NUMBER 1.00 5/8 TYPE X GYPSUM 4X10 25.20 25.20$ LOCATION OF WORK 1.00 CORNERBEAD 10 9.10 9.10$ 1.00 ALL PURPOSE COMPOUND BOX 19.50 19.50$ DESCRIPTION OF WORK 3.00 362T125-18 10'6.70 20.10$ -$ -$ -$ TASK/CLASSIFICATION HOURS RATE AMOUNT -$ Carpenter 3.00 115.00 345.00$ -$ Taper 5.00 115.00 575.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ TOTAL LABOR 8.00 Man HRs 920.00$ -$ -$ DESCRIPTION QTY RATE AMOUNT -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ TOTAL SUBCONTRACTOR -$ -$ -$ DESCRIPTION DAYS RATE AMOUNT -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ TOTAL MATERIALS 73.90$ TOTAL EQUIPMENT -$ 73.90$ 920.00$ -$ -$ 993.90$ -$ -$ -$ 993.90$ SUBCONTRACTOR Notes:SUBTOTALS MATERIAL LABOR SUBCONTRACTOR EQUIPMENT/OTHER SUBTOTAL (SELF-PERFORMED) OH/P (10%) (SUBCONTRACTOR) OH/P (5%) BOND PREMIUM PLEASE PAY THIS AMOUNT EQUIPMENT/OTHER Add bulkhead to accommodate ceiling LABOR MATERIAL SUMMARY OF WORK 115 Above A115A Door REASON Ceiling Height hits window above Cottage Grove Utility Building CDI FOREMAN John Leach Craig Moeller RFCO # 3 Request for Change Order CUSTOMER Kraus Anderson 11/25/2024 2912 -Anthony Lane St. Anthony, MN, 55418 www.commercialdrywall.net 230346 City of Cottage Grove New Utility B... 10875 Ideal Avenue South, Cottage Grove, Minnesota Prepared by Craig Moeller 1 Created with PlanGrid Work Order Nov 25, 2024, ID #53 REPORT DETAILS Description Add bulkhead over door Created by John Leach Status Draft Last update Nov 25, 2024 4:14 PM Last updated by John Leach 230346 City of Cottage Grove New Utility B... 10875 Ideal Avenue South, Cottage Grove, Minnesota Prepared by Craig Moeller 3 Created with PlanGrid PHOTOS (2) 20241125_124623_photo John Leach Nov 25, 2024 12:46 PM 20241125_124614_photo John Leach Nov 25, 2024 12:46 PM SNAPSHOTS (1) A3.01a John Leach Nov 25, 2024 4:09 PM 1 Struckman, Rachel From:Jaina Brinker <jaina@tcacoustics.com> Sent:Tuesday, December 31, 2024 10:56 AM To:Albrecht, Ben Subject:Re: Cottage Grove Utility Building - PCO 75_PR 18 Room A115 Soffit No, there won’t be a credit coming. There’s still a tile there so it’s no less material on our end. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 31, 2024, at 11:48 AM, Albrecht, Ben <ben.albrecht@krausanderson.com> wrote: Jaina, Will there be a small credit coming back for the soffit change in PR #18, as we removed ceiling grid? Need to get this processed by end of this week. Thanks! <image004.jpg> <image005.jpg> Ben Albrecht | Assistant Project Manager ben.albrecht@krausanderson.com | direct 612.255.2513 KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 501 South Eighth Street, Minneapolis, MN 55404 Office 612.332.7281 | Cell 763.401.2465 | krausanderson.com Together, strengthening the communities we serve <image001.png> From: Struckman, Rachel <rachel.struckman@krausanderson.com> Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2024 8:10 AM To: 'craig@commercialdrywall.net' <craig@commercialdrywall.net>; 'troy@steinbrecherpainting.com' <troy@steinbrecherpainting.com>; 'Jaina@tcacoustics.com' <Jaina@tcacoustics.com> Cc: Kjellberg, Dan <dan.kjellberg@krausanderson.com>; Albrecht, Ben <ben.albrecht@krausanderson.com>; Jacob Wollensak <jwollensak@woldae.com>; 'Kayla Simpson' <ksimpson@woldae.com>; 'Lee.Mann@stantec.com' <Lee.Mann@stantec.com>; 'rburfeind@cottagegrovemn.gov' <rburfeind@cottagegrovemn.gov>; Schauer, Dan <dan.schauer@krausanderson.com> Subject: Cottage Grove Utility Building - PCO 75_PR 18 Room A115 Soffit 1 Struckman, Rachel From:Troy Minks <troy@steinbrecherpainting.com> Sent:Thursday, November 7, 2024 12:55 PM To:Struckman, Rachel Subject:RE: Cottage Grove Utility Building - PCO 75_PR 18 Room A115 Soffit Rachel It would only be a small add, so no cost change for Steinbrecher. Troy From: Struckman, Rachel <rachel.struckman@krausanderson.com> Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2024 8:10 AM To: 'craig@commercialdrywall.net' <craig@commercialdrywall.net>; Troy Minks <troy@steinbrecherpainting.com>; 'Jaina@tcacoustics.com' <Jaina@tcacoustics.com> Cc: Kjellberg, Dan <dan.kjellberg@krausanderson.com>; Albrecht, Ben <ben.albrecht@krausanderson.com>; Jacob Wollensak <jwollensak@woldae.com>; 'Kayla Simpson' <ksimpson@woldae.com>; 'Lee.Mann@stantec.com' <Lee.Mann@stantec.com>; 'rburfeind@cottagegrovemn.gov' <rburfeind@cottagegrovemn.gov>; Schauer, Dan <dan.schauer@krausanderson.com> Subject: Cottage Grove Utility Building - PCO 75_PR 18 Room A115 Soffit All, Please see the a;ached PCO #75 regarding Wold PR #18 – Room A115 Soffit. If this PCO affects your work scope please respond within (7) days including appropriate back-up or this will be a zero cost change. Thank you, Rachel Struckman | Senior Project Coordinator rachel.struckman@krausanderson.com | direct 612-255-2378 KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 501 South Eighth Street, Minneapolis, MN 55404 office 612-332-7281 | krausanderson.com Together, strengthening the communities we serve Attachments: Wold PR #18 dated 11/5/24 We have reviewed the PCO and acknowledge that it is a “no change” item and does not affect our completion date. Signed By: Date: Company Name: 501 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55404 Request For Proposal Project: 2310312- PCO #: 75 City of Cottage Grove New Utility & Engineering Building 10875 Ideal Ave S Cottage Grove, MN 55016 Date: 11/07/2024 To: Dan Schauer, Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Ryan Burfeind, City Of Cottage Grove Lee Mann, Stantec Jaina Brinker, Twin City Acoustics, Inc. Jacob Wollensak, Wold Architects & Engineers Kayla Simpson, Wold Architects & Engineers Troy Minks, Steinbrecher Painting Company Craig Moeller, Commercial Drywall, Inc. Please provide a cost breakdown in accordance with the Contract Documents and a Summary for the Change described herein and on the attachments (if any) listed. All responses are required within seven (7) days. This is not an authorization to proceed with the work described herein unless and until approved by the Owner. On approval, this change will be included in a Change Order, which will provide the formal Contract Cha nge. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Please provide a cost estimate per the attached Wold Architects and Engineers PR #18 dated November 5, 2024 regarding room A115 soffit. PROPOSAL REQUEST Distribution: ☐ Ryan Burfeind, CG ☐ Adam Moshier, CG ☐ Dustin Phillips, KA ☒ Be Ben Albrecht, KA ☒ Jake Wollensak, Wold ☒ Kayla Simpson, Wold ☐ Pat Jansen, Wold ☐ Ryan Rossborough, Wold ☐ Sean McNamara, Wold ☐ Doug Galloway, Wold ☐ Derek Peterson, Wold ☐ Kal Jackman, BKBM ☐ James Dorr, BKBM ☐ Kyle Kucharski, BKBM ☐ Lee Mann, Stantec ☐ Dave Sanocki, Stantec ☐ Eric Vidden, Stantec City of Cottage Grove Utility & Engineering Building Kraus-Anderson Attn: Dan Kjellberg/Rachel Struckman 501 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55404 612.332.7281 dan.kjellberg@krausanderson.com / rachel.struckman@krausanderson.com Submit an itemized (labor and material) quotation for the proposed modifications to the contract documents as described herein within 21 days of receipt. If a cost is not submitted within 21 days, this Proposal Request can be accepted at no additional cost. Written approval is required prior to proceeding with this change. COST EXPECTATIONS: ☐ DEDUCT ☐ NO COST ☐ ADD PR: 18 Comm: 232010 Const. Pkg: [Status] Item Description 18 Room A115 Soffit 18.1 See sheet A3.01a – MAIN LEVEL REFLECTED CEILING PLAN – AREA A for revised reflected ceiling plan and location of new soffit in Room A115. Attachments: A3.01a Issued By: Kayla Simpson Date: 11/05/2024 CANLIGHT 1 X 4 LIGHT FIXTURE 4' STRIP LIGHT FIXTURE 8' STRIP LIGHT FIXTURE 2 X 2 LIGHT FIXTURE (IN CEILING GRID) 2 X 4 LIGHT FIXTURE (IN CEILING GRID) CEILING MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE SPEAKER AIR DIFFUSER (IN CEILING GRID) RETURN AIR GRILLE (IN CEILING GRID) AIR DIFFUSER EXHAUST GRILLE ACCESS PANEL LINEAR DIFFUSER (IN CEILING GRID) PTD. GYPSUM BOARD CEILING / SOFFIT PENDANT LIGHT FIXTURE S AP RCP LEGEND RCP KEY NOTES: 1 PAINT ALL EXPOSED STRUCTURE, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL PT-XX. DO NOT PAINT FIRE ALARM WIRES OR EQUIPMENT TAGS. 2 MODIFY CEILING GRID AS REQUIRED FOR NEW WORK. EXPOSED PT-8 EXPOSED PT-8 EXPOSED PT-8 A104 A105 A106 A109 A103 A100 A101 A102 A114 A110 A124 A132 A130 A131 10'-0" ACT 2 / 10'-0" ACT 2 / 9'-0" ACT 2 / 10'-0" ACT 2 / 10'-0" ACT 2 / 10'-0" ACT 2 / 9'-0" ACT 2 / 9'-0" ACT 2 / 9'-6" ACT 2 / 9'-6" ACT 2 / 9'-6" ACT 2 / 9'-6" ACT 2 / 9'-6" ACT 2 / 9'-0" ACT 2 / 9'-8" GWB / PT-8 10'-6" GWB / PT-8 10'-0" GWB / PT-8 10'-0" GWB / PT-8 10'-0" GWB / PT-8 10'-0" GWB / PT-8 10'-0" GWB / PT-8 10'-0" GWB / PT-8 A123 EXPOSED PT-8 EXPOSED PT-8 8'-0" GWB / PT-8 8'-0" GWB / PT-8 8'-0" GWB / PT-8 8'-0" GWB / PT-8 9'-0" ACT 2 / EXPOSED PT-8 EXPOSED PT-8 A127 8'-6" GWB / PT-8 A128 10'-0" ACT 2 / 10'-6" GWB / PT-8 7'-8" GWB / PT-8 9'-6" GWB / PT-8 9'-6" GWB / 7'-4" GWB / PT-8 F1 A4.801 _______ 7'-6" GWB / PT-8 7'-6" GWB / PT-8 A107 A108 FOR GARAGE RCP, SEE SHEET A3.02a A121 A119 A118 A117 A116A115 A113 A111 A112 A126 A125 F3 A4.801 _______ F4 A4.801 _______ F3 A4.801 _______ 10'-0" GWB / PT-8 F3 A4.801 _______ 1 F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: License Number: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed under the laws of the State of Scale: Date 501 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55404 krausanderson.com | 612 332 7281 11/5/2024 1:36:42 PMAutodesk Docs://232010 - MN CI Cottage Grove - New Utility Building/232010 - MN CI Cottage Grove - New UtilityBuilding R1.rvt1/8" = 1'-0"Central: Autodesk Docs://232010 - MN CI Cottage Grove - New Utility Building/232010 - MN CI Cottage Grove - NewUtility Building R1.rvtCITY OF COTTAGE GROVE NEW UTILITY & ENGINEERING BUILDING A3.01a MAIN LEVEL REFLECTED CEILING PLAN - AREA A 12800 RAVINE PKWY COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 10875 IDEAL AVENUE S. COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 JW KH 10/26/2023 232010 Minnesota 10/26/2023 John McNamara 24281 ARCHITECT RCP GENERAL NOTES 1. FOR WALLS THAT PENETRATE CEILINGS SEE WALL TYPES SHOWN ON THE FLOOR PLAN. 2. SPRINKLER HEADS ARE NOT SHOWN. LOCATE ALL SPRINKLER HEADS IN THE CENTER OF CEILING TILES. 3. FOR DIFFUSER AND RETURN GRILL SIZES, SEE MECHANICAL PLANS. 4. FOR LIGHT FIXTURE TYPES, SEE ELECTRICAL LIGHTING PLANS. 5. CEILINGS HEIGHTS INDICATED ON PLAN (E.G. 9'-0") ARE FROM FINISHED FLOOR OF LEVEL OF PLAN SHOWN OR INDICATED AS 109’-0”. 6. ACOUSTICAL TILE CEILING GRID IS TO BE CENTERED IN RECTANGULAR ROOM OR CENTERED BETWEEN LONGEST WALLS OF IRREGULARLY SHAPED ROOMS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7. VERIFY GWB CONTROL JOINT LOCATIONS WITH ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 0 1/8" = 1'-0" MAIN LEVEL REFLECTED CEILING PLAN - AREA AE1 6'12' A B Revisions Description Date Num PR #18 11/05/2024 1 Change Order Request Project: Cottage Grove, MN 55016 1087 Ideal Avenue S City of Cottage Grove New Utility & Engineering Building 2310312-02 COR # 30.00 Date:1/21/2025 Cottage Grove, MN 55016 To: Owner From: Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Minneapolis, MN 55404 501 South Eighth Street City Of Cottage Grove 12800 Ravine Parkway South Description: Shelf modifications to installed lockers at the City's request. AmountItem #Description Vendor PCO # 105 - Locker Changes 1 $1,109.49 Locker changes.Ebert Construction $1,109.49 Total For Change Order Signed: ____________________________Approved By: Submitted By: Date: __________________ Signed: ____________________________Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Date: __________________ Accepted By: Wold Architects & Engineers Signed: ____________________________Date: __________________ City Of Cottage Grove Corcoran, MN 55357 23350 County Road 10 Ph : 763-498-7844 Change Proposal Phone: Job:66055 City of Cottage G-Util-6A Carp Number: Date: 7 1/14/25 To:Kent Henry Kraus Anderson Const Co 501 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55404 Ph: 612-332-7281 Description:Remove Locker Riveted Shelves Proposed are the following changes: Remove riveted shelf per owners request and against contractors recomendations. Drill out rivets and clean out lockers from any demoed debris. Modify ADA bench in field for smaller RO. The total amount to provide this work is ..................................................................................................$1,109.49 (Please refer to attached sheet for details.) If you have any questions, please contact me at 763-498-7844. Submitted by:Approved by: Date: Ebert Companies Pricing subject to review/change if not approved within 14 days of receipt. Page 1 of 2 Corcoran, MN 55357 23350 County Road 10 Ph : 763-498-7844 Change Proposal 7 Price Breakdown Continuation Sheet Description:Remove Locker Riveted Shelves Description PriceMaterialSubcontractOtherEquipmentLabor Lockers $1,056.66$1,056.66 Subtotal:$1,056.66 $0.00OH&P Work Self Performed $52.83OH&P $1,056.66 5.00% Total:$1,109.49 Page 2 of 2 Proposal Utility & Engineering Bldg. Spacesaver Specialty Lockers Section: 10 51 16 Date: 1/15/25 2500 Broadway ST NE F.O.B. Delivered Minneapolis,MN 55413 PO #: Phone:(612)378-3800 Sales Rep: Matt Torfin Fax:(612)378-3100 Expiration: 30 Days WWW.MID-AMERICA.COM Terms: Net 30 Taxable: Yes DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE Spacesaver Freestyle Personal Storage Lockers as Specified to Consist of: (26) Freestyle Lockers to be field modified by removing rivets holding top shelf in position to allow all lockers shelves to remain adjustable (1) Wall-mounted ADA bench to be field modified Labor: Tax@ 8.375% TOTAL: $975.00 + $81.66 $ 1,056.66 Included: Normal Installation by Spacesaver Factory- Trained/Certified Technicians at Normal Wages, Normal Local Inside Delivery, Shipping & Handling, Unpacking & Debris Removal, Mobilization PROTECT YOUR INVESTEMENT WITH A SERVICE CONTRACT Subject to our credit department approval, this quotation is made for immediate acceptance and is subject to change without notice. If based on specially printed forms, it presupposes your acceptance of overruns or underruns not exceeding 10% of quantity ordered. Deliveries are subject to delays from fire, strikes, and other causes beyond our control. We reserve the right to correct clerical errors. Authorized Signature Date Change Order Request Project: Cottage Grove, MN 55016 10875 Ideal Ave S City of Cottage Grove New Utility & Engineering Building 2310312-COR # 31.00 Date:1/21/2025 Cottage Grove, MN 55016 To: Owner From: Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Minneapolis, MN 55404 501 South Eighth Street City Of Cottage Grove 12800 Ravine Parkway South Description: Door hardware and card reader changes per PR #19. AmountItem #Description Vendor PCO # 100 - Wold PR #19: Card Reader Update 1 $5,230.00 Doors/hardware per Wold PR #19.Bredemus Hardware Company, Inc. $5,230.00 Total For Change Order Signed: ____________________________Approved By: Submitted By: Date: __________________ Signed: ____________________________Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Date: __________________ Accepted By: Wold Architects & Engineers Signed: ____________________________Date: __________________ City Of Cottage Grove Change Order Request Project: Cottage Grove, MN 55016 1087 Ideal Avenue S City of Cottage Grove New Utility & Engineering Building 2310312-02 COR # 31.00 Date:1/21/2025 Cottage Grove, MN 55016 To: Owner From: Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Minneapolis, MN 55404 501 South Eighth Street City Of Cottage Grove 12800 Ravine Parkway South Description: Door hardware and card reader changes per PR #19. AmountItem #Description Vendor PCO # 100 - Wold PR #19: Card Reader Update 1 $313.50 Carpentry per Wold PR #19.Ebert Construction 2 $15,170.43 Electrical per Wold PR #19.Fobbe Electric, Inc. $15,483.93 Total For Change Order Signed: ____________________________Approved By: Submitted By: Date: __________________ Signed: ____________________________Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Date: __________________ Accepted By: Wold Architects & Engineers Signed: ____________________________Date: __________________ City Of Cottage Grove DATE: 1/9/25 TO: Kraus Anderson From: Dayton Bredemus PHONE: 612-255-2378 RE: 24-10 Cottage Grove Utility Building - PR19 NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEETS: 1 COMMENTS: The above combined for the sum of $5,230.00 Includes Tax - Material & Labor ($1,629.00) ($38.00) ($657.00) *INCLUDES RACEWAY DRILLING INTO EXISTING DOORS* 3 EA: Electronic Hinge (5BB1 4.5X4.5 TW4 CON) 2 EA: QEL Conversion Kit (114317-00) BREDEMUS HARDWARE CO., INC. 1285 SYLVAN STREET, ST PAUL, MN 55117 - (651) 489 6250 - FAX (651) 489 5502 E-Mail Address: dayton@bredemus.com 24-10 Cottage Grove Utility & Engineering Building - PR19 Pricing ATTN: Rachel Struckman 1 EA: Concealed Door Loop (CDL-BLK) 2 EA: Electronic Mortise Lock Case (L283-347 EU) 1 EA: Mortise Cylinder (30-138 626) 1 EA: Labor to Remove Old Hardware, Prep Doors & Frames For New Hardware, & Install New Hardware as Necessary *CARD READERS & WIRE HOOK UP BY OTHERS* ($1,400.00) ($183.00) ($1,323.00) Corcoran, MN 55357 23350 County Road 10 Ph : 763-498-7844 Change Proposal Phone: Job:66055 City of Cottage G-Util-6A Carp Number: Date: 105 1/3/25 To:Kent Henry Kraus Anderson Const Co 501 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55404 Ph: 612-332-7281 Description:Cottage Grove Utility- PCO 100- PR 19 Card Reader Updates Proposed are the following changes: See price below for PCO 100- PR 19 Card Reader Updates as requested. The total amount to provide this work is ..................................................................................................$313.50 (Please refer to attached sheet for details.) If you have any questions, please contact me at 763-498-7844. Submitted by:Approved by: Date: Ebert Companies Pricing subject to review/change if not approved within 14 days of receipt. Page 1 of 2 Corcoran, MN 55357 23350 County Road 10 Ph : 763-498-7844 Change Proposal 105 Price Breakdown Continuation Sheet Description:Cottage Grove Utility- PCO 100- PR 19 Card Reader Updates Description PriceMaterialSubcontractOtherEquipmentLabor Doors and Frames $285.00$285.00 Subtotal:$285.00 $28.50OH&P Work Self Performed $285.00 10.00% $0.00OH&P Total:$313.50 Page 2 of 2 COST ISSUE DATE:12/30/2024 TO:PROJECT:66055 City of Cottage Grove 6A Ebert Construction RE:PCO #100 DATE: TIME EXTENSION REQUESTED: DESCRIPTON: MATERIAL/LABOR BREAK-DOWN AMOUNT Carpenter Changes to hardware groups at doors A115B, A125, A127.3 Hrs @ $95.00 /Hr =$285.00 SIGN: DATE:TOTAL ADDITIONAL COST:$285.00 Prepared By: Kevin Roehl APPROVAL EBERT CONSTRUCTIONDISTRIBUTION 12/16/2024 Jake Stolquist Corcoran, MN 55357 23350 County Road 10 Changes per PCO #100. Insert Owner Logo Fobbe Electric Inc Date :12/27/24 111 Meadowlark Drive Delano, MN 55328 PCO #:100 Project Manager: Ryan Fobbe PR/SI #19 612-618-7220 Description Cost Labor Total 1,890.00$ Materials and Equipment Total 450.00$ Tax on Materials and Equipment Only -$ Self Performed Subtotal 2,340.00$ 10% Overhead and Profit 234.00$ Self Performed Total 2,574.00$ Subcontractors 11,996.60$ 5% Overhead and Profit on Subs 599.83$ Subcontractor Total 12,596.43$ TOTAL COST OF CHANGE 15,170.43$ Signature: Labor By Task Qty Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Project Coordination 2 135.00$ 270.00$ Labor to provide raceways for doors 12 135.00$ 1,620.00$ -$ -$ Sub-Total 1,890.00$ Materials and Equipment By Task Qty Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Raceways for doorsConduit, boxes, straps and misc electrical material 1 450.00$ 450.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Sub-Total 450.00$ Sub-Contractor Proposals Total Cost LVC (see attached) Div 8 providing the locking hardware 11,996.60$ -$ -$ -$ Sub-Total (Attach Sub-Contractor Proposals)11,996.60$ Auto Fill from Sub-Total Below (5% is the max allowed on subcontractors) <<< Provide Sales/Use Tax Total City of Cottage Grove New Utility & Engineering Building (10% is the max fee allowed on CO's) Description of Work Notes/Attachments (Auto Fill from Sub-Total Below) (Auto Fill from Sub-Total Below) PROVIDE DETAIL BREAKDOWN BELOW: COST SUMMARY Contractor acknowledges no other Costs assciated with this PCO. Insert Owner Logo LVC Companies Date :12/26/24 6105 Golden Hills Drive, Suite 110 Golden Valley, MN 55416 PCO #: Project Manager: PR/SI # Description Cost Labor Total 5,450.00$ Materials and Equipment Total 5,193.00$ Tax on Materials and Equipment Only 289.30$ Self Performed Subtotal 10,643.00$ 10% Overhead and Profit 1,064.30$ Self Performed Total 11,707.30$ Subcontractors -$ 5% Overhead and Profit on Subs -$ Subcontractor Total -$ TOTAL COST OF CHANGE 11,996.60$ Signature: Labor By Task Qty Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Wire Installation8 136.25$ 1,090.00$ Device Installation 26 136.25$ 3,542.50$ Programming & Design6 136.25$ 817.50$ Electrified Lock Hardware Installation0 136.25$ -$ Sub-Total 5,450.00$ Materials and Equipment By Task Qty Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Security Equipment1 3,594.00 3,594.00$ Wire1 1,599.00 1,599.00$ Electrified Locking Hardware0 7,127.00-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Sub-Total 5,193.00$ Sub-Contractor Proposals Total Cost-$ -$ -$ -$ Sub-Total (Attach Sub-Contractor Proposals)-$ Auto Fill from Sub-Total Below (5% is the max allowed on subcontractors) <<< Provide Sales/Use Tax Total City of Cottage Grove New Utility & Engineering Building (10% is the max fee allowed on CO's) Description of Work Notes/Attachments (Auto Fill from Sub-Total Below) (Auto Fill from Sub-Total Below) PROVIDE DETAIL BREAKDOWN BELOW: COST SUMMARY Contractor acknowledges no other Costs assciated with this PCO. FIRE PROTECTION ∙ FIRE ALARMS & LIFE SAFETY ∙ SECURITY ∙ STRUCTURED CABLING COMMUNICATION ∙ NATIONAL SERVICES ∙ SERVICE Low Voltage Technology – CO1 Cottage Grove Utility and Engineering Building 10875 Ideal Avenue South Cottage Grove, MN 55016 Prepared for: Fobbe Electric Prepared by: Christopher Temp Date: 12/26/2024 LVC is pleased to provide this proposal for the systems in the above-referenced project. Page 2 of 7 LVC is pleased to provide this Change Order proposal based on the Drawings & Request provided. Cost Breakout is provided on PCO request form. ACCESS CONTROL ADD’s Quantity Product or Category Name 2 Lenel LNL-1320-S3 Dual reader control module 4 HID Signo series card reader 5 Nascom door position switch 4 Bosch Request to Exit motion sensor 4 Connections to locking hardware 1 OSDP Composite Cable – to match project Lot Installation, programming, and testing labor Lot Taxes and freight Note 1 All Conduit, Raceway, and Sleeves will be installed by the electrical contractor. Note 2 All Network connections will be provided by owner. LOCKING HARDWARE ADD’s Quantity Product or Category Name 1 Hes 9600 surface mount strike for external door with locking hardware 2 Hes Cut-in Strikes to work with door lock hardware 2 Von Duprin – Electrified exposed vertical rod crash-bars 4 Installation of locking hardware by in-house locksmith Change order 1 – Access Control Investment ………………………….. $11,996.60 Change order 1 – Electrified Locking Hardware Investment……… $10,641.72 LVC offers an affordable Managed Services plan to save you time and money. Our expert team ensures your equipment and systems are always at peak performance and current with the latest security features and patches. For just 10% of the total project cost (excluding any services), our Managed Services plan offers exceptional value for most businesses. This plan ensures you receive comprehensive support and maintenance, allowing you to focus on your core operations without any hassle. If you're interested in learning more or have any questions, please feel free to reach out. Selected Appendices are incorporated into this Proposal and are a part of the Parties' contractual Agreement: ☒ Clarification and Exclusions ☒ General Terms and Conditions SCOPE OF WORK M A N A G E D S E R V I C E S A P P E N D I C E S L I S T Page 3 of 7 Thank you for your consideration. We welcome your questions, any further discussion, and proposal acceptance. Best regards, Christopher Temp System Sales 952-540-7728 Ctemp@lvcinc.com P R O P O S A L A C C E P T A N C E Authorization to Proceed Name Date Title PO or Job # Signature Page 4 of 7 Clarifications: • LVC will provide a one-year warranty on parts and labor commencing on the date of Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) or Owner acceptance. • Any required CAD files will be provided to LVC Inc. at no additional cost to complete the required permit submittals. LVC will provide all design submittal documents and plans upon receiving CAD files from others at no additional cost to LVC. If BIM/Revit modeling is required, additional design fees will apply. • All programming and panel terminations are to be done by LVC Companies. • All cabling will be installed to industry standards and with proper support. • All cabling pathways are assumed to be available for use without additional conduits, fire sleeves, core holes, or other means to run cabling. • Cabling will be plenum where required. Exclusions: • All electrical, including but not limited to 120VAC connections, rough-in conduits and boxes, other conduit, raceways, penetrations, cable trays, POE entry sleeves, floor X-rays, surface raceways for low voltage cable pathways, telephone grounding bus bars, plywood phone bars, and power poles, shall be supplied by electrician or others. • LVC Companies is not responsible for any repairs of sheetrock, ceiling tile, tile grid, or any superficial material, including paint, wall covering, paneling wood, steel studs, access hatches, or any non-supporting structure material related to completing the installation of the system. • Customer or others shall provide server and workstations for access control panels and/or video management system software. • Customer or others shall provide network IP addresses and connectivity for access control panels and/or video management. • All network connectivity, including switches and patch panels, shall be provided by Customer or others. • Unless otherwise specified, the door hardware provider or others shall supply electrified locks and lock installation. • Unless otherwise noted, the following are not included in this Proposal: o Demolition of existing systems, devices, or cabling o Lift scheduling or rentals A P P E N D I X : C L A R I F I C A T I O N S A N D E X C L U S I O N S Page 5 of 7 1. Work and Services. LVC Companies commits to executing the work and providing the goods, software, licenses, and services detailed in the Proposal ("Work"). Upon acceptance by the Customer, the Proposal becomes the binding Agreement ("Agreement") between the parties for Customer's systems identified in the Proposal ("Systems"). 2. Pricing. Pricing is generally valid for 30 days from the date of this Proposal. In the event of unforeseen or unplanned supply chain challenges, LVC Companies reserves the right to charge additional fees and/or change orders associated with unknown and unplanned tariffs, additional shipping charges, and/or material cost increases at any time before the project starts or during the project regardless of initially agreed contract price. LVC Companies will supply data and information for these changes as necessary. 3. Lead Time. LVC Companies will require sufficient lead time (generally a minimum of 2 weeks) to order parts, schedule, and complete the submittal and permitting process. Project kickoff depends on LVC Companies' ability to secure materials on time. Factors outside LVC Companies' control may necessitate timeline changes, such as material or shipping delays. 4. Safe Storage. Others shall provide LVC Companies with a secure area on site for staging and material storage upon job commencement. 5. Work Hours. Work shall be completed during normal business hours of 7:00 a.m. – 3:30 p.m. Overtime premiums are not included in this Proposal. However, during the project and as timelines dictate, LVC Companies may elect to schedule their Work in such a way as to meet deadlines. Customer will be responsible for paying any overtime costs arising from Customer's acts, omissions, or decisions. 6. Customer Cooperation. Customer shall permit or arrange for reasonable access to the premises by LVC Companies personnel. Customer shall cooperate with LVC Companies in obtaining any necessary consents and waivers from the owner of the premises. Any delays experienced due to restricted access or areas not being ready for vendor (moving items, waiting for people to move, etc.) may be subject to added costs. 7. Changes Orders. Any changes by Customer or Work outside the Proposal will cause Customer to incur additional costs. LVC Companies will provide Customer with a detailed description of the proposed changes, including any associated costs and timeline adjustments. Change Orders must be approved before additional work is completed. Change Orders will be billed at the time of acceptance. 8. Parking Fees. Parking fees are included in this Proposal unless otherwise specified. 9. Materials. All materials will be billed at the time of procurement. 10. Systems Management, Optimization, Maintenance, and Backup. Unless specified in the Proposal, all systems management, optimization, maintenance, and backup tasks are excluded from the scope of Work and will not be performed by LVC Companies. Customer must arrange for these tasks to be performed by others. 11. Force Majure. LVC Companies shall not be responsible for any delays or costs caused by acts of nature or God, including but not limited to force majeure events, or for any other cause beyond LVC Companies' reasonable control. 12. Incidental Damage. LVC Companies is not responsible for any repairs of sheetrock, ceiling tile, tile grid, or any superficial material, including paint, wall covering, paneling wood, steel studs, access hatches, or any non-supporting structure material related to completing the repair or installation of the system. 13. Compensation and Payment Terms. Customer agrees to promptly settle all invoices from LVC Companies within thirty (30) days of the invoice date. Any payments not received within this period will incur additional charges. Credit card payments will be charged a fee of 3%. 14. Sales Tax. Proposal pricing does not include any applicable sales taxes unless otherwise noted. When applicable, sales will be included on the invoice. 15. Warranty. LVC will provide Customer with a one-year limited warranty on parts and labor. Details may be found at www.lvcinc.com/warranty. 16. Manufacturer Terms, Conditions, and Warranties. Manufacturer's End-User License Agreements (EULA), Manufacturer or Software Provider's Acceptable Use Policy (AUP), and any applicable warranties are hereby incorporated into the Agreement, and Customer agrees to be bound by the same. All applicable manufacturer information can be found at www.lvcinc.com/partners. See the manufacturer's individual websites for updated terms, conditions, and warranty language. Written copies will be provided upon reasonable request. Customer shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless LVC Companies from and against all actions, proceedings, demands, claims, liabilities, losses, damages, judgments, costs, and expenses including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, reasonable legal fees and disbursements actually incurred, together with all applicable taxes, which LVC Companies may be liable to pay or may incur by reason of, or directly or indirectly arising out of, any breach of Manufacturer's EULA, AUP, or Manufacturer's Terms and Conditions of Service. Manufacturer's EULA, AUP, and Terms and Con ditions may be found on Manufacturer websites. A P P E N D I X : G E N E R A L T E R M S A N D C O N D I T I O N S Page 6 of 7 17. Recurring Services. Recurring Services are services generally offered on a periodic or ongoing basis and paid for in regular, ongoing installments ("Recurring Services"). If Recurring Services are included in the Proposal, additional terms apply. a. Term. The initial duration is determined by the term lengths(s) shown per service in the Recurring Services Detail table (the "Initial Term"). Commencement of the Initial Term starts upon installation completion, equipment activation, and establishment of necessary communication connections. NOTE: Payment for all Installation and Equipment Charges is a precondition for equipment activation and the selected Recurring Services. b. Auto Renewal. Following the expiration of the Initial Term, all chosen Recurring Services will automatically renew for successive one-year terms (each, a "Renewal Term"). However, the Customer retains the right to cancel such auto-renewal for any selected Recurring Services by providing written notice to LVC no less than thirty (30) days before the auto-renewal date. c. Pricing Adjustment. LVC reserves the right to adjust charges for Recurring Services after the Initial Term, limited to once in any twelve (12) month period, by providing the Customer with a thirty (30) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of a price increase notice, the Customer holds the right to terminate this Agreement by providing written notice within thirty (30) days of the notice. d. Early Termination. Should the Customer terminate a Recurring Service during the Initial Term or a Renewal Term, the Customer agrees to pay LVC, along with all outstanding charges prior to termination, the remaining charges for the unexpired portion of the Initial Term or Renewal Term (as applicable) for that Recurring Service. The Customer acknowledges and agrees that this amount represents a mutually agreed early termination charge, akin to liquidated damages, and is not considered a penalty. 18. Limitation of Liability. In no event shall LVC Companies be liable to Customer or any third party for consequential, special, indirect, or incidental damages arising out of the use or inability to use the Systems, including but not limited to loss of data or Information of any kind which Customer may experience, or fines or penalties imposed on Customer for failure to meet a governmental law, regulation or requirement for which the Systems are directly or indirectly used by Customer. LVC Companies does not represent or warrant that the System will prevent any loss by or through burglary, hold-up, fire, or otherwise; or that the Systems will, in all cases, provide the protection for which it is installed or intended. Customer acknowledges LVC Companies is not an insurer, that Customer assumes all risk for loss or damage to Customer's premises or to its contents, that LVC Companies has made no representation or warranties beyond what is included in the Limited Warranty, nor has Customer relied on any representation or warranties, expressed or implied, except as set forth herein and Customer acknowledges that he has read and understands this Agreement, particularly LVC Companies obligation and maximum liability in the event of any loss or damage to Customer. It is understood and agreed by and between the Parties hereto that this Agreement is not intended to be an insurance policy or substitute for an insurance policy. Insurance, if any, will be obtained by Customer. Charges are based upon the value of Customer's property, Systems, and/or the property of others on Customer's premises. The fees paid by Customer are not sufficient to warrant LVC Companies assuming any risk of consequential or other damages to Customer due to LVC Companies negligence or failure to perform. Customer does not desire this Agreement to provide for the liability of LVC Companies, and Customer agrees that LVC Companies shall not be liable for loss or damage due directly or indirectly to any occurrence or consequences therefrom, which the System is designated to detect or avert. From the nature of the Work to be performed, it is impractical and extremely difficult to fix the actual damages, if any, which may proximately result from the failure on the part of LVC Companies to perform any of their respective obligations hereunder, or the failure of the System to properly operate with the resulting loss to Customer. If LVC Companies should be found liable for loss or damage due to a failure on the part of the System, in any respect, such party's liability shall be limited to the refund to Customer to the sum of two-hundred fifty ($250) dollars, as liquidated damages and not as a penalty, and this liability shall be exclusive. The provisions of this paragraph shall apply in the event loss or damage; irrespective of cause or origin, results directly or indirectly to person or property from the performance or nonperformance of the obligations set forth by the terms of this contract or negligence, active or otherwise, of LVC Companies or their agents or employees. 19. Indemnification. Each party shall indemnify the other for claims arising from its acts or omissions in performing obligations under the Agreement. LVC Companies will indemnify Customer against any claims arising from its negligence or misconduct in the performance of the Work, and Customer will indemnify LVC Companies against any claims arising from its use of the deliverables provided by LVC Companies. 20. Transfer of Property. If Customer sells or transfers ownership of a site or any part thereof to a third party during the term of this Agreement, Customer shall remain responsible for the payment of the balance remaining in the Agreement for the Services provided to that site. The responsibility for payment shall transfer to the new owner only upon the written agreement and acknowledgment of LVC Companies. Customer shall notify LVC Companies in writing of any change of ownership or transfer of a site within 30 days of the transaction. Failure to provide such notification and obtain written agreement from LVC will result in Customer's continued responsibility for charges under the Agreement. 21. Intellectual Property. Each party's intellectual property remains its own unless otherwise provided in the Agreement. The design and intent of the items listed in this system specification or Proposal are considered intellectual property owned by Page 7 of 7 LVC Companies, and the Customer agrees not to disclose content to any party other than those intended by LVC Companies. Disclosure of this design or intent will subject the discloser to consultant and design fees. 22. Insurance. Certificates of Insurance are available upon request. Any additional insurance beyond LVC's standard coverage is excluded from the pricing in the Proposal and shall be paid for by Customer. 23. Software. Any software provided with the Equipment or in connection with the Services is proprietary to LVC Companies and/or LVC Companies supplier(s) and is licensed or sublicensed to Customer on a non-exclusive basis. 24. Entire Agreement. The Agreement, including any included Appendices, contains the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter of the Agreement and supersedes any and all prior oral and/or written understandings and agreements. Any modifications to the Agreement must be in writing and signed by both parties. 25. Survival. Provisions intended to survive the cancellation, expiration, or termination of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. Attachments: Wold PR #19 dated 12/13/24 We have reviewed the PCO and acknowledge that it is a “no change” item and does not affect our completion date. Signed By: Date: Company Name: 501 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55404 Request For Proposal Project: 2310312- PCO #: 100 City of Cottage Grove New Utility & Engineering Building 10875 Ideal Ave S Cottage Grove, MN 55016 Date: 12/16/2024 To: Dan Schauer, Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Ryan Burfeind, City Of Cottage Grove Lee Mann, Stantec Dayton Bredemus, Bredemus Hardware Company, Inc. Jacob Wollensak, Wold Architects & Engineers Kayla Simpson, Wold Architects & Engineers Jake Stolquist, Ebert Construction Ryan Fobbe, Fobbe Electric, Inc. Please provide a cost breakdown in accordance with the Contract Documents and a Summary for the Change described herein and on the attachments (if any) listed. All responses are required within seven (7) days. This is not an authorization to proceed with the work described herein unless and until approved by the Owner. On approval, this change will be included in a Change Order, which will provide the formal Contract Cha nge. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Please provide a cost estimate per the attached Wold Architects and Enginers PR #19 dated December 13, 2024 regarding card reader update. PROPOSAL REQUEST Distribution: ☒ Ryan Burfeind, CG ☐ Adam Moshier, CG ☐ Dustin Phillips, KA ☒ Be Ben Albrecht, KA ☒ Jake Wollensak, Wold ☒ Kayla Simpson, Wold ☐ Pat Jansen, Wold ☐ Ryan Rossborough, Wold ☒ Sean McNamara, Wold ☒ Doug Galloway, Wold ☒ Derek Peterson, Wold ☐ Kal Jackman, BKBM ☐ James Dorr, BKBM ☐ Kyle Kucharski, BKBM ☒ Lee Mann, Stantec ☐ Dave Sanocki, Stantec ☐ Eric Vidden, Stantec City of Cottage Grove Utility & Engineering Building Kraus-Anderson Attn: Dan Kjellberg/Rachel Struckman 501 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55404 612.332.7281 dan.kjellberg@krausanderson.com / rachel.struckman@krausanderson.com Submit an itemized (labor and material) quotation for the proposed modifications to the contract documents as described herein within 21 days of receipt. If a cost is not submitted within 21 days, this Proposal Request can be accepted at no additional cost. Written approval is required prior to proceeding with this change. COST EXPECTATIONS: ☐ DEDUCT ☐ NO COST ☐ ADD PR: 19 Comm: 232010 Const. Pkg: [Status] Item Description 19 Card Reader Update 19.1 See revised sheet A2.01a – MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN – AREA ‘A’ for updated Door / Opening Schedule. Doors A115B, A125, A126A and A127 to be apart of Hardware Group 19. 19.2 See revised sheet E3.11a – MAIN LEVEL SYSTEMS PLAN – AREA ‘A’ for added card readers at doors A115B, A125, A126A and A127. Attachments: A2.01a, E3.11a Issued By: Kayla Simpson Date: 12/13/2024 DWWDFLOOR PLAN KEY NOTES:1DOOR ACTUATORS2BOLLARD - SEE DETAIL3TUB SINK - SEE MECHANICAL4NEW CONCRETE STOOP, SEE DETAIL5EMERGENCY EYE WASH. SEE MECH.6CABINET UNIT HEATER. SEE DETAIL SEEMECH. FOR SPECIFICATIONS, COORDINATELOCATION WITH MECH.7NEW CONCRETE APRON, SEE STRUCTURAL8LOCATION OF SEMI-RECESSED DEFIBRILLATORCABINET.9LOCATION OF WASHER AND DRYER (NIC)10SQUARE BRICK ACCENT - SEE ELEVATIONS/SECTIONS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION11BASE MOUNTED CRANE SYSTEMF6/A5.50212ELEC FLOOR BOX, SEE ELEC.C5/A5.70215ALTERNATE NO. 1: PROVIDE ACCESS PANEL (AP-1)FOR MANIFOLD/SNOW MELT SYSTEM, SEE MECH.COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION WITH MECH.CONTRACTOR.16PROVIDE SHUT OFF VALVE ON HOSE CONNECTION.SEE MECH.18PROVIDE FIRE TREATED PLYWOOD BACKING ASREQUIRED FOR OWNER PROVIDED TECHNOLOGY.COORDINATE WITH OWNER/ARCHITECT ON EXACTLOCATION.20STAINLESS STEEL CORNER GUARD UP TO 7'-2".21STAINLESS STEEL CORNER GUARD UP TO BOTTOMOF BENCH.22FLAG POLE. SEE SPEC FOR HEIGHT. SEEELECTRICAL FOR LIGHTING.23LOCATION OF FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET(SEMI-RECESSED IN RM. A110).C4/A4.70613CONCRETE PAD. COORDINATE SIZE AND LOCATIONWITH MECHANICAL. SEE DETAILS:B7/A4.706C7/A4.706E7/A4.70614HOLD OPEN17TRENCH DRAIN, SEE DETAILE2/A4.70519FRP FROM FLOOR TO 8'-0" AFF.24CONCRETE SPLASH BLOCK; SEE DETAIL .C7/A5.70225CARD READER GOOSE NECK PEDESTAL FOR OHDOOR OPERATION. COORDINATE EXACT LOCATIONWITH OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. SEEELECTRICAL.F4A5.201_______C1A5.101E1A5.101C5A5.101ABCDE1345261.1C4A5.202_______C6A5.202_______F1A5.202_______C2A5.202_______C7A5.201_______D.1C.1VEST.A100LOBBYA101TOILET ROOMA102QUIET ROOMA114OPEN OFFICEA103SMALLCONFERENCEROOMA104OFFICEA105OFFICEA106WORK ROOMA109STAFF ROOMA110WATER METERROOMA130STREET LIGHTSTORAGEA131WATERSERVICEA132JC / MAINT.A124CIRC.A112A100A101A103A111AA114A115BA110AA114A124 A130ATOILET ROOMA128MECH/ELECA125STORAGEA126JC.A123F1A5.101CIRC.A115PERSONALSTORAGEA116A121A125A126AA110BA123ELECTRICALROOMA127A132A134BA134C_______D5A4.103GA6GA6GA6GA6GA6GA6GA6GA6GA6GA6GA6GA6GA6GA6GE5GE5GA6MA2MA3GA6MA2MA2MA2C2A5.201_______F7A5.201_______F6A5.201_______C4A5.201_______C6A5.201_______F4aA5.202_______A130BSF3SF3SF3SF3SF3A1121614444CW3A134A9_______F1A4.201_______F5A4.103W1W1CONF. RM.A111A4.451C7A4.451B4B2aA4.451B6A4.451B1aA4.451E1A4.451E4A4.451E6A4.451F6A4.451C3A4.451D1A4.451E29'-8"A4.451A4.451F4F2A5.201_______F2SF2SF2SF2SF2A115AA111BW1A11799'-6"18'-0"34'-0"4'-8" 5'-4" 5'-4" 5'-4" 5'-4" 5'-4" 5'-4" 5'-4" 5'-4" 5'-4" 4'-0" 11'-2" 2'-8"3'-0" 1'-8"7'-6" 26'-8" 34'-2"1'-6"20'-6" 22'-0"1'-6"38'-0" 34'-0" 32'-0"1'-0"12'-2" 131'-6"31'-0"10'-0"6'-0"15'-0"A131A A131B20'-0" X 20'-0" CONC PAD, SEE CIVIL56'-0" 6'-0" 18'-0" 6'-0" 20'-0"13'-4"56'-0"50'-0"4'-0"2'-8" 22'-8" 6'-8" 5'-4" 2'-8" 5'-4" 2'-8" 5'-4" 2'-8" 5'-4"21'-4"7'-4" 107'-2" 106'-0"16'-0"A102OFFICEA108OFFICEA107C1A5.201_______10'-0"4"1'-4"13'-2"16'-6"10'-6"25'-10"1'-8"2'-0"47'-0"1'-0"1.4D.4D.6B.5C.5SF1GB2VEHICLEGARAGEA134F6A5.202_______C1A5.202_______7'-0" 1'-0"7'-4"WASH ROOMA136CHANGINGROOMA119ADA SHOWERROOMA117ADA TOILETA121SHOWER ROOMA11876'-0"148'-0"GB2_______F7A4.103A4.451D25538A127A108GA6722_______E7A4.10312121212TOILET ROOMA113CW41415A11316'-0"GE6_______A7A4.706100'-0"F1A5.201_______A128C417A107A106A105A1044'-0"181818184'-0"2'-0"8'-0"3'-4"4'-0"A118A119A126BA4.101F27'-0"1'-2" 4'-0"8"1'-4" 4'-0" 4'-0" 8'-0" 16'-0"8"1'-4" 4'-0" 4'-0" 8'-0"14'-8"8'-11" 4'-9" 2'-0" 9'-4"8'-2" 9'-2"8'-9"10'-11"9 1/2"9'-6"8"9'-6" 8" 9'-6" 8" 9'-6"8"5"9'-6"10"5" 16'-3 3/4"4'-11 1/4" 3'-3"1'-5"4"5'-0" 6'-0" 15'-0"28'-1 3/4"13'-8 1/2"GB2D4D6CW1CW219A1167'-9" 3'-9"5"20F1A5.1012020202020202014'-10 1/2"20202020202030'-11 1/2"7'-11"5'-4"5'-2 3/4"131313134"F2A5.202_______AP2PTD22_______B7A5.702TBD6'-0"523232323MA3MA3PB8PB8PB8PB8PB8PB8A4.451B7C7A5.202_______C6A5.202_______SIMNOTESAPPLYC7A5.202_______SIMF1A5.202_______SIMMB3MA2PB8MA2232324D7_______B2A5.5021'-0 1/2"1'-0 1/2"GE5A4.103A2A4B2B4C6a252424GB21'-0"GA6GA6GA6GA6GA65"CPT-2CPT-1_______B6A5.503_______B6A5.5031'-0" 9'-4"23'-0"~1/4" / 1'-0" SLOPE38'-8 1/2"1'-2"35'-1 1/2"32'-8" 6'-0 3/4"~3/16" / 1'-0" SLOPE~1/8" / 1'-0" SLOPE~3/16" / 1'-0" SLOPE104'-0"1313MA33333313 1/2"15 1/2"17'-9 1/8"2'-5 1/2"12121212125555511'-6" 20'-6"8'-6"8'-6"11'-6"7'-5" 7'-0" 7'-0"9'-4"A4.451F4aA4.451F2a33'-8" 23'-6" 48'-0"A4.451F4a3MASONRY 166FOR FRAME DEPTH, ONLY EXCEPTIONS TO THE FOLLOWING TABLE ARE SCHEDULED:GYPSUM BOARD PARTITIONS: THROAT OF FRAME TO MATCH WALL THICKNESS.MASONRY PARTITIONS:4" WALL: 3 3/4" FRAME6" WALL: 5 3/4" FRAME8" AND GREATER WALL: 7 3/4" FRAMEFRAME DEPTHS ARE SCHEDULED IN NOMINAL DIMENSIONS. SEE FRAME/ DOOR TYPES (DETAIL SECTION 51000) FOR CORRESPONDING ACTUAL DIMENSIONS.ALL DOORS ARE 1 3/4" THICK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.FOR GLASS TYPES, ONLY EXCEPTIONS TO THE FOLLOWING TABLE ARE SCHEDULED:INTERIOR NON RATED:CLEAR (SAFETY WHEN REQUIRED BY TABLE IN GLAZING SPECIFICATION.)INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR RATED:FIRE RATEDEXTERIOR NON-RATED:CLEAR INSULATED (SAFETY INSULATED WHEN REQUIRED BY TABLE IN GLAZING SPECIFICATION.)SEE SHEET A2.901 FOR FRAME TYPES.SEE SHEET A2.901 FOR DOOR TYPES.AT DOOR SCHEDULE, LABEL DESIGNATION "45/20" INDICATES:FOR ALL OPENINGS WITH SIDE LITES AND SCHEDULED TO BE RATED FOR 20 MINUTES, THE DOOR AND ANY GLASS WITHIN THE DOOR IS TO BE RATED FOR 20 MINUTES; THE FRAME AND ADJACENT SIDELITE(S) GLASS AND FRAME IS TO BE RATED FOR 45 MINUTES."1.2.3.4.5.6.DOOR SCHEDULE GENERAL NOTESCARD READER, SEE ELECTRICAL.1.2.DOOR SCHEDULE REMARKSPROVIDE FIRE NUMBER AT EXTERIOR DOORS DOOR NUMBER IN "_".3.EXTEND DOOR FRAME WIDTH BE 3/4" WIDER TO ACCOUNT FOR THICKNESS OF WOOD PANEL.4. SEE F1/A2.01b FOR OPENING WIDTH.SEE INTERIOR ELEVATIONS FOR LOCATIONS OF PAINTED BLOCK, TILE AND PAINT.1.PROVIDE TILE TO A HEIGHT OF 4'-6" WITH EPOXY PAINT ABOVE. PROVIDE FULL HEIGHT TILE ON ANY WALL WITH PLUMBING FIXTURES. PROVIDE FULL HEIGHT TILE AT ALL SHOWER WALLS.2.3.PROVIDE GYPSUM BOARD SOFFIT ABOVE CASEWORK. (SEE CASEWORK ELEVATIONS AND REFLECTED CEILING PLANS.)4.SEE A5.1 STAIR DETAILS, ELEVATIONS, AND SECTIONS FOR FINISH MATERIALS.5. SEE DETAIL FOR TILE PATTERN INFORMATION.6.PAINT CEILING AND ALL EXPOSED STRUCTURE, PIPING, CONDUIT, MECHANICAL DUCTS AND VENTS.7.8.PROVIDE VINYL BASE AT CASEWORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.9.10.11.12.PROVIDE TACK WALL FINISH ON ENTIRE INDICATED WALL - SEE PLANS FOR LOCATIONS. PROVIDE FORM FINISHED FLOO0R TO 4" ABOVE THE CEILING, WALL TO WALL.13.SEE DETAIL FOR TILE PATTERN INFORMATION.SEE INTERIOR ELEVATIONS FOR LOCATIONS OF PAINT.PROVIDE CUT TILE AT BASE WITH WAINSCOT TRIM AT TOP OF CUT TILE THROUGHOUT ROOM.PROVIDE EPOXY PAINT AT ALL WALLS THROUGHOUT THIS ROOM.SLOPE CONC. FLOOR TOWARDS EXTERIOR DOOR. SEE PLANS FOR FLOORSLOPING INFORMATION.ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE REMARKSE4/A4.706F4/A4.70614. PT-6A/ PT-6E, SEE F2/A4.101FEDCBA1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8AMNNorthCheck:Drawn:Date:Comm:License Number:I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensedunder the laws of the State ofScale:Date501 South Eighth StreetMinneapolis, MN 55404krausanderson.com | 612 332 728112/13/2024 10:23:05 AMAutodesk Docs://232010 - MN CI Cottage Grove - New Utility Building/232010 - MN CI Cottage Grove - New UtilityBuilding R1.rvtAs indicatedCentral: Autodesk Docs://232010 - MN CI Cottage Grove - New Utility Building/232010 - MN CI Cottage Grove - NewUtility Building R1.rvtCITY OF COTTAGEGROVENEW UTILITY &ENGINEERINGBUILDINGA2.01aMAIN LEVELFLOOR PLAN -AREA A12800 RAVINE PKWYCOTTAGE GROVE, MN 5501610875 IDEAL AVENUE S.COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016JWKH10/26/2023232010Minnesota10/26/2023John McNamara24281ARCHITECTROOM FINISH SCHEDULE - AREA A - MAIN LEVELROOMNOROOM NAME FLOOR BASEN WALL - TYP E WALL S WALL W WALLREMARKSMATL FIN MATL FIN MATL FIN MATL FINA100 VEST. PTILE-1 PTILE-1 SF ... SF ... GWB PT-6A SF ... 1, 10A101 LOBBY PTILE-1 PTILE-1 SF ... GWB PT-6A GWB PT-6A SF ... 1, 3, 10A102 TOILET ROOM PTILE-1 PTILE-1 GWB PTILE-2/PTILE-3GWB PTILE-2/PTILE-3GWB PTILE-2/PTILE-3GWB PTILE-2/PTILE-32, 5A103 OPEN OFFICE CPT-1/CPT-2 VB-1 GWB PT-6A/PT-6CGWB PT-6A/PT-6CGWB PT-6A GWB PT-6A 3, 13A104 SMALL CONFERENCE ROOM CPT-2 VB-1 GWB PT-6A GWB PT-6B GWB PT-6A GWB PT-6AA105 OFFICE CPT-2 VB-1 GWB PT-6A GWB PT-6B GWB PT-6A GWB PT-6AA106 OFFICE CPT-2 VB-1 GWB PT-6A GWB PT-6B GWB PT-6A GWB PT-6AA107 OFFICE CPT-2 VB-1 GWB PT-6A GWB PT-6B GWB PT-6A GWB PT-6AA108 OFFICE CPT-2 VB-1 GWB PT-6A GWB PT-6B GWB PT-6A GWB PT-6AA109 WORK ROOM CPT-2 VB-1 GWB PT-6A CONC PT-6B GWB PT-6A GWB PT-6AA110 STAFF ROOM PTILE-1 PTILE-1 GWB PT-6A GWB PT-6B GWB PT-6A GWB PT-6B 3, 10A111 CONF. RM. CPT-2 VB-1 GWB PT-6A GWB PT-6B GWB PT-6A GWB PT-6BA112 CIRC. CPT-1 VB-1 GWB PT-6A GWB PT-6A GWB PT-6A ... ...A113 TOILET ROOM PTILE-1 PTILE-1 GWB PTILE-2/PTILE-3GWB PTILE-2/PTILE-3GWB PTILE-2/PTILE-3GWB PTILE-2/PTILE-32, 5A114 QUIET ROOM CPT-1 VB-1 GWB PT-6A GWB PT-6A GWB PT-6B GWB PT-6AA115 CIRC. PTILE-1 PTILE-1 GWB PT-6A GWB PT-6A GWB PT-6A GWB PT-6A 10A116 PERSONAL STORAGE CPT-1 VB-1 GWB PT-6A GWB PT-6A GWB PT-6A GWB PT-6AA117 ADA SHOWER ROOM PTILE-1 PTILE-1 GWB PTILE-2/PTILE-3GWB PTILE-2/PTILE-3/PTILE-5GWB PTILE-2/PTILE-3/PTILE-5GWB PTILE-2/PTILE-32, 5, 12A118 SHOWER ROOM PTILE-1 PTILE-1 GWB PTILE-2/PTILE-3GWB PTILE-2/PTILE-3/PTILE-5GWB PTILE-2/PTILE-3/PTILE-5GWB PTILE-2/PTILE-32, 5, 12A119 CHANGING ROOM PTILE-1 PTILE-1 GWB PT-6A GWB PT-6A GWB PT-6A GWB PT-6A 10A121 ADA TOILET PTILE-1 PTILE-1 GWB PTILE-2/PTILE-3GWB PTILE-2/PTILE-3GWB PTILE-2/PTILE-3GWB PTILE-2/PTILE-32, 5A123 JC. S. CONC ... CONC PT-6A CMU PT-6A CMU PT-6A CONC PT-6AA124 JC / MAINT. S. CONC ... CONC PT-6A CMU PT-6A CONC PT-6ACONC PT-6A 6A125 MECH/ELEC S. CONC ... CONC PT-6A CONC PT-6A CONC PT-6A CONC PT-6A 6A126 STORAGE S. CONC ... CONC PT-6A CONC PT-6A CMU PT-6A CMU PT-6A 6A127 ELECTRICAL ROOM S. CONC ... CMU PT-6A CMU PT-6A CONC PT-6A CMU PT-6A 6A128 TOILET ROOM S. CONC ... CMU PT-6A GWB PT-6A CONC PT-6A CMU PT-6AA130 WATER METER ROOM S. CONC ... CONC PT-6A CONC PT-6A CMUPT-6A CONC PT-6A 6A131 STREET LIGHT STORAGE S. CONC ... CONC PT-6A CONC PT-6A CMU PT-6A CONC PT-6A 6A132 WATER SERVICE S. CONC ... CMU PT-6A CMU PT-6A CONC PT-6A CONC PT-6AA134 VEHICLE GARAGE S. CONC ... CONC/CMU PT-6A ... ... CONCPT-6A CONC PT-6A 6, 14A136 WASH ROOM S. CONC ... CONC PT-6A CMU PT-6A CMU PT-6A CMUPT-6A 6KEY PLANDOOR / OPENING SCHEDULE - MAIN LEVEL - AREA ADOOR NODOOR / OPENINGLABEL/RATINGOVERALLWIDTHFRAMEGLMOUNTING CONDITIONSHDWGRPREMARKSTYPE QTY WIDTH HEIGHT MATL TYPE DEPTH MATL HEAD JAMB SILLA100 AL 1 3'-0" 7'-8" AL -- 3'-0" CW1 -- AL -- SEE ELEV. SEE ELEV. SEE ELEV. 01 1A101 AL 1 3'-0" 7'-8" AL -- 3'-0" SF 1 -- AL -- SEE ELEV. SEE ELEV. SEE ELEV. 02 1A102 F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" WD -- 3'-4" FR 1 -- HM -- D6/A4.801 D6/A4.801 -- 09A103 G 1 3'-0" 7'-0" WD -- 3'-4" FR 1 -- HM -- D6/A4.801 D6/A4.801 -- 19 1A104 FG 1 3'-0" 7'-0" A-WD -- 9'-0" FR 2 -- HM -- D6/A4.801 D6/A4.801 -- 13A105 FG 1 3'-0" 7'-0" A-WD -- 9'-0" FR 2 -- HM -- D6/A4.801 D6/A4.801 -- 13A106 FG 1 3'-0" 7'-0" A-WD -- 9'-0" FR 2 -- HM -- D6/A4.801 D6/A4.801 -- 13A107 FG 1 3'-0" 7'-0" A-WD -- 9'-0" FR 2 -- HM -- D6/A4.801 D6/A4.801 -- 13A108 FG 1 3'-0" 7'-0" A-WD -- 9'-0" FR 2 -- HM -- D6/A4.801 D6/A4.801 -- 13A110A N 1 3'-0" 7'-0" A-WD -- 5'-4" FR 2A -- HM -- D6/A4.801 D6/A4.801 -- 07A110B G 1 3'-0" 7'-0" WD -- 3'-4" FR 1 -- HM -- D6/A4.801 D6/A4.801 -- 07A111A G 1 3'-0" 7'-0" WD -- 3'-4" FR 1 -- HM -- D6/A4.801 D6/A4.801 -- 20 1, 3A111B F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" A-WD -- 5'-4" FR 2A -- HM -- D6/A4.801 D6/A4.801 -- 18 1A112 F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" WD -- 5'-4" FR 2A -- HM -- D6/A4.801 D6/A4.801 -- 08A113 F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" WD -- 3'-4" FR 1 -- HM -- D6/A4.801 D6/A4.801 -- 09A114 F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" WD -- 3'-4" FR 1 -- HM -- D6/A4.801 D6/A4.801 -- 09A115A N 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-4" FR 1B -- HM -- C2/A5.602 D2/A5.602 B7a/a5.601 03 1A115B G 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM 45 3'-4" FR 1 -- HM -- E3/A5.601 E5/A5.601 -- 19A116 -- -- 12'-0" 8'-0" -- -- 12'-0" GS 1 -- AL -- -- -- -- --A117 F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" WD -- 3'-4" FR 1 -- HM -- D6/A4.801 D6/A4.801 -- 10A118 F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" WD -- 3'-4" FR 1 -- HM -- D6/A4.801 D6/A4.801 -- 10A119 F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" WD -- 3'-4" FR 1 -- HM -- D6/A4.801 D6/A4.801 -- 11A121 F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" WD -- 3'-4" FR 1 -- HM -- D6/A4.801 D6/A4.801 -- 09A123 G 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-4" FR 3 -- HM -- B4/A4.801 B6/A4.801 -- 06A124 F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-4" FR 1 -- HM -- E3/A5.601 E5/A5.601 -- 14A125 F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM 45 3'-4" FR 1 -- HM -- E3/A5.601 E5/A5.601 -- 19A126A F 2 3'-6" 7'-0" HM 45 7'-4" FR 3 -- HM -- B4/A4.801 B6/A4.801 -- 19A126B F 2 3'-4" 7'-0" HM -- 7'-0" FR 3 -- HM -- B4/A4.801 B6/A4.801 -- 04A127 F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-4" FR 3 -- HM -- B4/A4.801 B6/A4.801 -- 19A128 F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-4" FR 1 -- HM -- E3/A5.601 E5/A5.601 -- 12A130A F 1 3'-8" 7'-0" HM -- 4'-0" FR 3 -- HM -- B4/A4.801 B6/A4.801 -- 21 1A130B MCDF 1 8'-0" 8'-4" HM -- 8'-4" CDF -- HM -- D3/A4.801 D4/A4.801 -- --A131A F 1 3'-8" 7'-0" HM -- 4'-0" FR 3 -- HM -- B4/A4.801 B6/A4.801 -- 22A131B MCDF 1 8'-0" 8'-4" HM -- 8'-4" CDF -- HM -- D3/A4.801 D4/A4.801 -- -- 1A132 F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-4" FR 3 -- HM -- B4/A4.801 B6/A4.801 -- 15A134A OHG-2 1 16'-0" 14'-0" AL -- 16'-0" OH-2 -- AL -- F5/A5.601 F7/A5.601 F3a/A5.601 --A134B N 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-4" FR 1A -- HM -- E3/A5.601 E5/A5.601 B7a/a5.601 03 1, 2A134C N 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-4" FR 1A -- HM -- E3/A5.601 E5/A5.601 B7a/a5.601 03 1, 2PLAN GENERAL NOTES1. ALL PLAN DIMENSIONS ARE NOMINAL TO FACE OFWALL. WALL THICKNESSES ARE SHOWNNOMINAL, SEE WALL TYPES FOR ACTUALTHICKNESS.2. ALL GYP. WALLS ARE TO BE 5 INCHES THICKUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.3. ALL CONCRETE BLOCK WALLS ARE TO BE 8INCHES THICK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.4. COORDINATE SIZE AND LOCATION OF ALL DUCTAND SHAFT OPENINGS IN WALLS AND FLOORS W/MECH. AND ELEC. PROVIDE ALL REQUIREDLINTELS FOR OPENINGS. SEE LINTEL SCHEDULE.5. FIELD VERIFY ALL MILLWORK OPENINGS.6. SET FLOOR DRAINS 3/4" BELOW FINISHEDCONCRETE FLOORS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.PROVIDE CONSISTENT SLOPE FROM WALL TODRAIN BY SLOPING CONCRETE, MIN. 1/4" PERFOOT.7. VERIFY LOCATION, SIZE AND QUANTITY OF ALLMECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENTPADS.8. ALL DOOR/SIDELITE OPENINGS TO BEGIN 4"FROM ADJACENT WALL UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.9. ALL GYP. WALLS ARE CENTERED ON GRIDUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.10. FIRE RATED WALLS ARE INDICATED ON CODEPLANS.01/8" = 1'-0"MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - AREA AF16'12'ABRevisionsDescription Date NumAddendum No.1 11/14/2023 1PR #01 02/05/2024 2PR #04 03/19/2024 3PR #05 03/20/2024 4SI #07 07/26/2024 5SI #8 11/19/2024 6PR #19 12/13/2024 71112223333333333344777 GENERAL SHEET NOTES KEYED SHEET NOTES DW WDD2D2D2D2D2D2D2D2D2D2D2D2D2D2D2D2D2D2D2D2D2D2 D2 ABD2D2ABWAP WAP WAP WAP S S S S S S SCR SCR SCRSESSESSESSDCSDCSDC SDCSESSCR SCRSES SDC SDC SES SCRSCRS ES S DC SDC SES SCRSCRSES SDC S DC S ESSCR S J FB1 J FB1 J FB2 J FB2 J FB2 J FB2 J FB2 J FB2 D2D2D2D2D2D2 D2D2SSIC SMSF FAAP F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F FS FS FSFS FSFS FS FS FS FS FS FCO FACPF FS FCO FCO FS FS FSTVJ FB1 F TS F TS F TS F TS F FL F FL F T FFFFCOADAADAADAADASCRSEL S DC SCRSCRS CRSDCSDCSEL SDCSELS EL S DC A. SOME NOTES MAY NOT APPLY TO THIS SHEET B. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR WIRING ALL ELECTRICAL ITEMS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS, EXCEPT ITEMS LISTED ON SHEET E0.01 GENERAL ELECTRICAL NOTES. C. COORDINATE WITH OTHER TRADES AND REFER TO DIV. 27 & DIV. 28 SPECIFICATIONS FOR FULL REQUIREMENTS. D. MAINTAIN WORKING CLEARANCES AROUND ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE ARTICLE 110. E. INSTALL DATA / SYSTEMS / AV CONDUIT WITH NO MORE THAN (2) 90° BENDS BETWEEN PULL BOXES AND NO MORE THAN 100’-0” BETWEEN PULL BOXES. PULL BOXES SHALL BE INSTALLED FOR STRAIGHT THROUGH PULLS ONLY. NOT ALL PULL BOXES ARE SHOWN ON PLANS. F. ALL COMMUNICATIONS CABLES AND OTHER LOW VOLTAGE CABLING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN CONDUIT, CABLE TRAY, OR SUPPORTED BY CABLE HOOKS. PROVIDE BUSHINGS AT THE ENDS OF ALL CONDUIT WHERE STUBBED ABOVE ACCESSIBLE CEILINGS OR WHERE DROPPED INTO CABLE TRAY. PROVIDE CABLE HOOKS ABOVE ACCESSIBLE CEILINGS FOR CABLE INSTALLATION WHERE NOT INSTALLED IN CONDUIT OR CABLE TRAY. G. FLOOR BOXES SHALL NOT BE DAISY CHAINED TOGETHER BETWEEN ADJACENT FLOOR BOXES FOR LOW VOLTAGE CABLE ROUTING. ALL CONDUITS FOR FLOOR BOXES SHALL BE HOME RUNS TO NEAREST ACCESSIBLE CEILING SPACE. H. REFER TO FLOORBOX AND POKE-THRU SCHEDULE FOR FULL REQUIREMENTS AT EACH LOCATION. COORDINATE LOCATIONS PRIOR TO ROUGH-IN. (NEEDS DISCUSSION WITH THE ELECTRICAL TEAM) I. LOCATIONS OF FLOOR BOXES AND FLOOR PENETRATIONS SHALL NOT BE MEASURED FROM THIS SET OF DRAWINGS. INSTALLER SHALL REQUEST PRECISE LOCATIONS FROM ARCHITECT. J. COORDINATE RECESSED CASEWORK DEVICES AND ABOVE COUNTER (AB) DEVICES WITH ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATION DRAWINGS AND DETAILS. WHERE CONFLICTS OCCUR, SUBMIT RFI. K. COORDINATE WITH ASSOCIATED ELECTRICAL DEVICE AND OTHER TRADES. WHERE CONFLICTS OCCUR, SUBMIT RFI. L. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR FIRE RATED PARTITIONS. PROVIDE AN APPROVED FIRE STOP SYSTEM FOR EACH RACEWAY OR CABLE ROUTED THROUGH A RATED WALL. REFER TO DIV. 7 AND DIV. 27 SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. M. SYMBOLS USED ON TECHNOLOGY DRAWINGS ARE NOT A SCALED SIZE, THEREFORE LOCATIONS OF THE SYMBOLS ARE APPROXIMATE AND NEED TO BE COORDINATED WITH OTHER DEVICES AND ELEMENTS IN THE VICINITY. GENERAL GUIDELINES: N. VOICE, DATA, AND TV OUTLETS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN 6 INCHES OF A POWER OUTLET SHOWN ON THE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS O. WALL PHONE OUTLET PLACEMENT SHALL PROVIDE ADEQUATE CLEARANCE TO INSTALL THE TELEPHONE HANDSET. COORDINATE CLEARANCE WITH OTHER TRADES (CARPENTRY, MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, ETC.) P. WHERE MULTIPLE TECHNOLOGY SYMBOLS ARE SHOWN ADJACENT TO EACH OTHER, THE SPACING BETWEEN OUTLETS SHALL BE CONSISTENT IF NO ELEVATION IS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. Q. WHEN THE INSTALLER IS UNCERTAIN ABOUT ADJACENCIES OF DEVICES, THE QUESTION SHALL BE PRESENTED VIA RFI. 1. CONNECTED TO PHONE SYSTEM AT OFFICE. COORDINATE WITH INTERCOM SYSTEM. 2. PROVIDE CONNECTION FOR FIRE SUPRESSION CONTROL PANEL. A B C D E 1 3 4 5 2 6 1.1 D.1C.1 1.4 D.4 D.6 B.5 C.5 WATER METER ROOM A130 STREET LIGHT STORAGE A131 ELECTRICAL ROOM A127 STORAGE A126 MECH/ELEC A125 JC / MAINT. A124 TOILET ROOM A128 JC. A123 WATER SERVICE A132 ADA TOILET A121 ADA SHOWER ROOM A117 PERSONAL STORAGE A116 CIRC. A115 QUIET ROOM A114 CONF. RM. A111 CIRC. A112 STAFF ROOM A110 WORK ROOM A109 OFFICE A106 OFFICE A105 SMALL CONFERENCE ROOM A104 OPEN OFFICE A103 TOILET ROOM A102 LOBBY A101 VEST. A100 VEHICLE GARAGE A134 WASH ROOM A136 SHOWER ROOM A118 CHANGING ROOM A119 TOILET ROOM A113 OFFICE A107 OFFICE A108 3 5 1 WP 1 1 1 1 F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 E MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: License Number: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed under the laws of the State of Scale: Date 12/13/2024 2:35:05 PMAutodesk Docs://232010 - MN CI Cottage Grove - New Utility Building/232010 New Utility Building Elec.rvt1/8" = 1'-0"Central: Autodesk Docs://232010 - MN CI Cottage Grove - New Utility Building/232010 New Utility Building Elec.rvtCITY OF COTTAGE GROVE NEW UTILITY & ENGINEERING BUILDING E3.11a MAIN LEVEL SYSTEMS PLAN - AREA 'A' 12800 RAVINE PKWY COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 10875 IDEAL AVENUE S. COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 S MCNAMARA D PETERSON 10/26/2023 232010 MINNESOTA 10/26/2023 BRADLEY R. JOHANNSEN 43936 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER 1/8" = 1'-0" ML SYSTEMS PLAN AREA 'A'E1 Revisions Description Date Num PR #19 12/13/2024 1 Change Order Request Project: Cottage Grove, MN 55016 10875 Ideal Ave S City of Cottage Grove New Utility & Engineering Building 2310312-COR # 32.00 Date:1/22/2025 Cottage Grove, MN 55016 To: Owner From: Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Minneapolis, MN 55404 501 South Eighth Street City Of Cottage Grove 12800 Ravine Parkway South Description: Remobilization cost to cut stone and install Knox box when arrived onsite. AmountItem #Description Vendor PCO # 102 - Axel Ohman: Misc. Masonry Extras 1 $710.00 Misc. masonry extras.Axel H. Ohman, Inc. $710.00 Total For Change Order Signed: ____________________________Approved By: Submitted By: Date: __________________ Signed: ____________________________Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Date: __________________ Accepted By: Wold Architects & Engineers Signed: ____________________________Date: __________________ City Of Cottage Grove Change Order Request Project: Cottage Grove, MN 55016 1087 Ideal Avenue S City of Cottage Grove New Utility & Engineering Building 2310312-02 COR # 32.00 Date:1/22/2025 Cottage Grove, MN 55016 To: Owner From: Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Minneapolis, MN 55404 501 South Eighth Street City Of Cottage Grove 12800 Ravine Parkway South Description: Remobilization cost to cut stone and install Knox box when arrived onsite. AmountItem #Description Vendor PCO # 102 - Axel Ohman: Misc. Masonry Extras 1 ($284.00)Backcharge: Mortar Repair Damage.Fobbe Electric, Inc. ($284.00)Total For Change Order Signed: ____________________________Approved By: Submitted By: Date: __________________ Signed: ____________________________Kraus-Anderson Construction Company Date: __________________ Accepted By: Wold Architects & Engineers Signed: ____________________________Date: __________________ City Of Cottage Grove 1 Struckman, Rachel From:Albrecht, Ben Sent:Monday, December 16, 2024 2:31 PM To:Struckman, Rachel Subject:FW: Cottage Grove Attachments:Document_241127_085911.pdf Rachel, Please add this to the PCO log. The 2 hours for the mortar repair was due to damage from pulling against the wall with a coredrilling anchor. So 40% of the $710 cost ($284) will be backcharged to Fobbe. Thanks, Ben Albrecht | Assistant Project Manager ben.albrecht@krausanderson.com | direct 612.255.2513 KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 501 South Eighth Street, Minneapolis, MN 55404 Office 612.332.7281 | Cell 763.401.2465 | krausanderson.com Together, strengthening the communities we serve From: Albrecht, Ben Sent: Friday, December 6, 2024 11:43 AM To: Schauer, Dan <dan.schauer@krausanderson.com> Subject: FW: Cottage Grove Ben Albrecht | Assistant Project Manager ben.albrecht@krausanderson.com | direct 612.255.2513 KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 501 South Eighth Street, Minneapolis, MN 55404 Office 612.332.7281 | Cell 763.401.2465 | krausanderson.com Together, strengthening the communities we serve From: Jordan Boeser <Jordan@axelohman.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2024 9:02 AM To: Albrecht, Ben <ben.albrecht@krausanderson.com> Subject: Cottage Grove 2 Ben please see the attached masonry extras that came in. Thanks Jordan JORDAN BOESER Estimator / Project Manager Cell: 612-490-3724 Jordan@AxelOhman.com Corcoran, MN 55357 23350 County Road 10 Ph : 763-498-7844 Change Proposal Phone: Job:66055 City of Cottage G-Util-6A Carp Number: Date: 106 1/20/25 To:Kent Henry Kraus Anderson Const Co 501 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55404 Ph: 612-332-7281 Description:Added Bench Pedestals Proposed are the following changes: Provide and install 2 additional pedestals per bench location (3 locations total). Install pedestals on the front side of the wall mounted bench to prevent deflection per Kraus Anderson's direction. Two options available. Stainless Steel option recomended and priced. The total amount to provide this work is ..................................................................................................$950.91 (Please refer to attached sheet for details.) If you have any questions, please contact me at 763-498-7844. Submitted by:Approved by: Date: Ebert Companies Pricing subject to review/change if not approved within 14 days of receipt. Page 1 of 2 Corcoran, MN 55357 23350 County Road 10 Ph : 763-498-7844 Change Proposal 106 Price Breakdown Continuation Sheet Description:Added Bench Pedestals Description PriceMaterialSubcontractOtherEquipmentLabor Lockers $905.63$905.63 Subtotal:$905.63 $0.00OH&P Work Self Performed $45.28OH&P $905.63 5.00% Total:$950.91 Page 2 of 2 Proposal Utility & Engineering Bldg. Spacesaver Specialty Lockers Section: 10 51 16 Date: 1/16/25 2500 Broadway ST NE F.O.B. Delivered Minneapolis,MN 55413 PO #: Phone:(612)378-3800 Sales Rep: Matt Torfin Fax:(612)378-3100 Expiration: 30 Days WWW.MID-AMERICA.COM Terms: Net 30 Taxable: Yes DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE Spacesaver Freestyle Personal Storage Lockers as Specified to Consist of: (6) Almond painted pedestals for ADA benches OR (6) Stainless Steel pedestals for ADA benches Tax included @ 8.375% Almond: Stainless: Labor: $609.61 OR $800.63 $105.00 Labor includes adding (2) pedestals per bench for a total of (6) pedestals Included: Normal Installation by Spacesaver Factory- Trained/Certified Technicians at Normal Wages, Normal Local Inside Delivery, Shipping & Handling, Unpacking & Debris Removal, Mobilization PROTECT YOUR INVESTEMENT WITH A SERVICE CONTRACT Subject to our credit department approval, this quotation is made for immediate acceptance and is subject to change without notice. If based on specially printed forms, it presupposes your acceptance of overruns or underruns not exceeding 10% of quantity ordered. Deliveries are subject to delays from fire, strikes, and other causes beyond our control. We reserve the right to correct clerical errors. Authorized Signature Date 1 City Council Action Request 7.J. Meeting Date 2/5/2025 Department Parks and Recreation Agenda Category Action Item Title Ice Arena Space Programming and Concept Design Staff Recommendation Authorize service agreement with Oertel Architects for Ice Arena lobby/office programming and concept design services. Budget Implication This is in the 2025 capital improvements plan and ice arena budget. Attachments 1. 1-Memo-Remodel Concept Design Agreement 2. Service Agreement with Exh A To:Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From:Zac Dockter, Parks and Recreation Director Date:January 29, 2025 Subject:Ice Arena Space Programming and Concept Design Service Agreement Introduction/Background The Cottage Grove Ice Arena was built in 1973 and has been a point of pride for the community for over 50 years. The last major building upgrades were completed in 2008 where a third sheet of ice was added (west rink) and the lobby/viewing gallery was expanded. However, the office area, concession area and main lobby features were never changed and are showing their age. A space programming and concept design project would aim to create a plan that resolves the following challenges at the facility: 1. Office space is not sufficient for level of staffing. Workstations are cramped and oftentimes shared with no room for expansion. 2. Concession area and old restrooms (now hockey equipment storage) has an inefficient layout that was pieced together through several small construction projects over the ice arena’s 50 years. The current layout does not maximize the available space and reduces traffic flow and revenue potential of the concession area. 3. Lobby is aged and could use aesthetic improvements to create a more welcoming environment at one of the finest ice facilities in the State of Minnesota. Deliverables of this project would be a space analysis, floor plan and conceptual design/renderings. Anticipated schedule would be 3 months from time of ideation/kickoff meeting. Total cost for services is proposed at $12,000. Oertel Architects is recommended for this service agreement. Oertel Architects has done similar work with the New Hope Ice Arena which is a sister facility to Cottage Grove’s, thus giving them inside knowledge on structural design. Additionally, Oertel was helpful and showed expertise in ice arena design needs when modeling potential plans for expanded hockey locker rooms this past year. Staff Recommendation Authorize service agreement with Oertel Architects for Ice Arena lobby/office programming and concept design services. 1 City Council Action Request 7.K. Meeting Date 2/5/2025 Department Public Works Agenda Category Action Item Title 2025 Hamlet Pond Maintenance – Quote Award Staff Recommendation Adopt Resolution 2025-012 awarding the 2025 Hamlet Pond Maintenance project to the quote supplied by New Look Contracting, Inc. in the amount of $97,592.00, and the appropriate officials are hereby authorized to sign all necessary documents to effectuate these actions. Budget Implication $48,796.00 - Stormwater Fund $48,796.00 - Grant Attachments 1. Hamlet Pond Quote Award CC Memo 2. Hamlet Pond Quote Award - New Look Proposal 3. Hamlet Pond Quote Award - Rachel Dev Proposal 4. Hamlet Pond Quote Award Resolution To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From: Crystal Raleigh, PE, Assistant City Engineer Date: January 28, 2025 Re: 2025 Hamlet Pond Maintenance – Quote Award Background Each year the City completes maintenance on City-owned stormwater ponds to stay in compli- ance with the MS4 permit with the MPCA, which requires permit holders to maintain their storm sewer system. Removal of accumulated sediment from ponds is a common maintenance task that restores a pond’s ability to treat stormwater. This year’s project focuses on Hamlet Pond. The pond was originally a natural water body, but it became a stormwater pond in the 1960s with the construction of the Thompson Grove neighborhood. Since that time, it has been excavated and expanded over the years to accom - modate development and to increase flood storage to protect downstream infrastructure. The large storm outfall from the Thompson Grove neighborhood has accumulated sediment, making the pond shallower and more conducive to cattail growth and beaver activity. A 2023 survey showed that upstream of the sediment plume, the water level was approximately 2 feet higher than downstream of the plume. The project proposes to remove sediment and organic debris to equalize the ponding levels north and south of the outfall and to restore the 2 feet of flood capacity in the northern bay of the pond. Discussion The City of Cottage Grove received two pond maintenance quotes. The following table summarizes the results of the quotes. The quotes received are attached. The low quote for the project was provided by New Look Contracting, Inc. in the amount of $97,592.00. Contractor Quoted Amount New Look Contracting, Inc. $97,592.00 Rachel Contracting, LLC $156,943.00 The Engineer’s Estimate for the project was $101,000. A grant has been secured that will fund 50 percent of project costs up to $150,000. Where feasible, the City will work with the contrac- tor during the project to remove additional sediment from the pond to better utilize the gran t funds. Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Jennifer Levitt 2025 Hamlet Pond Maintenance – Quote Award January 30, 2025 Page 2 of 2 Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve Resolution 2025-012 awarding the 2025 Hamlet Pond Maintenance project to the quote supplied by New Look Contracting, Inc. in the amount of $97,592.00, and the appropriate officials are hereby authorized to sign all necessary documents to effectuate these actions. 2 QUOTE FORM 2025 HAMLET POND MAINTENANCE PROJECT CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA The undersigned hereby agrees to perform all work in accordance with the contract, plans and approved specifications of the City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota. Item Number Contract Item Unit Estimated Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost 1 Mobilization LS 1 2 Clearing AC 0.3 3 Grubbing AC 0.3 4 Excavation – Channel and Pond (LV) CY 960 5 Temporary Construction Entrance EA 2 6 Topsoil Borrow (LV) CY 200 7 Rolled Erosion Prevention Mat SY 1330 8 Seeding, MnDOT Type WD LB 6 9 Street Sweeper W/Operator HR 5 TOTAL QUOTE $ ________________ IT IS AGREED that the excavation work shall be completed by March 15, 2025 with restoration and final project completion by May 31, 2025. Respectfully submitted, ________________________________ Name (a corporation, an individual, a partnership) ________________________________ Street Address ________________________________ City, State, Zip Code ________________________________ Telephone ________________________________ Signature ________________________________ Date ________________________________ Name ________________________________ Title $15,000.00 $12,300.00 $4,400.00 $69.00 $1.00 $36.00 $2.50 $135.00 $1.00 $3,690.00 $1,320.00 $66,240.00 $2.00 $7,200.00 $3,325.00 $810.00 $5.00 97,592.00 New Look Contracting, Inc. 14045 Northdale Blvd. Rogers, MN 55374 (763) 241-1596 $15,000.00 01/27/2025 Dylan Libbert Project Manager/ Estimator ________________________________ Signature $60,600.00 $60,600.00 $3,750.00 $1,125.00 $5,440.00 $1,632.00 $85.20 $81,792.00 $2,000.00 $4,000.00 $10.00 $2,000.00 $1.80 $2,394.00 $400.00 $2,400.00 $200.00 $1,000.00 $156,943.00 CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2025-012 RESOLUTION AWARDING THE 2025 HAMLET POND MAINTENANCE PROJECT TO NEW LOOK CONTRACTING, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $97,592.00 WHEREAS, plans and specifications for the 2025 Hamlet Pond Maintenance Project were completed according to City standards; and WHEREAS, quotes were requested to provide the necessary work; and WHEREAS, two firms submitted quotes; and WHEREAS, it appears that New Look Contracting, Inc. provided the lowest responsible quote; and WHEREAS, it is the recommendation of the City Engineer that the quote be awarded to New Look Contracting, Inc. in the amount of $97,592.00. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, that the 2025 Hamlet Pond Mainte- nance Project be awarded to New Look Contracting, Inc. in the amount of $97,592.00. Passed this 5th day of February 2025. Myron Bailey, Mayor Attest: Tamara Anderson, City Clerk 1 City Council Action Request 7.L. Meeting Date 2/5/2025 Department Finance Agenda Category Action Item Title Call for Sale of 2025A General Obligation Improvement Bonds Staff Recommendation Adopt 2025-011, Providing for the sale of the $10,000,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2025A Budget Implication N/A principal and interest amounts have been included in the Financial Management Plan Attachments 1. Council Memo Call for Sale of 2025A Bonds 2. PreSale Report 2025A 3. 2025-11 Cottage Grove 2025A Presale Resolution To:Mayor and City Council Members Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From:Brenda Malinowski, Finance Director Date:February 5, 2025 Subject:Call for Sale of $10,000,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2025A INTRODUCTION Funding is necessary to finance expenditures for the 2025 Pavement Management project, Low Zone Water Tower project, equipment, and the River Oaks irrigation project. The funding was identified in both the 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Plan and the Financial Management Plan. DISCUSSION The bonds will be repaid with water area charges to developers (water tower project), special assessments (pavement management), golf course revenues (irrigation project), and future property tax levies (portion of pavement management and equipment). The future property tax levies were included in the Financial Management Plan that was utilized in the 2025 Budget process. Since the irrigation project will be issued under the tax abatement process, a public hearing for that portion of the bond issue will be be held on February 19th. A pre-sale report from Ehlers includes a timeline for the bond sale as well as other estimates and general information. ACTION REQUESTED Review Pre-Sale Report and adopt Resolution 2025-11, Providing for the sale of the $10,000,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2025A. February 5, 2025 PRE-SALE REPORT FOR City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota $10,000,000 General Obligation Bonds Series 2025A               Prepared by: Ehlers 3060 Centre Pointe Drive Roseville, MN 55113 Advisors: Stacie Kvilvang, Senior Municipal Advisor Keith Dahl, Municipal Advisor Schane Rudlang, Municipal Advisor     BUILDING COMMUNITIES. IT’S WHAT WE DO.   Presale Report City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota February 5, 2025 Page 1 Proposed Issue: $10,000,000 General Obligation Bonds Series 2025A Purposes: The proposed issue includes financing for the following purposes:  2025 Pavement Management – $2,915,000: This portion of the Bonds are being issued for a 16-year period to finance the City’s 2025 pavement management projects. The City levied $1,449,907 (39%) of the cost to benefiting property owners. We have assumed $217,486 in prepayments (15%) so the size of the Bonds has been reduced accordingly. Debt service will be paid from special assessments and ad valorem property taxes.  Water Tower - $3,785,000: This portion of the Bonds are being issued for a 10-year period to finance a new water tower. Debt service will be paid from utility revenues.  Equipment Certificates - $1,660,000: This portion of the Bonds are being issued for a 5-year period to finance the purchase of a fire truck (50% tender), a brush chipper, asphalt patcher, two single-axle dump trucks, and other vehicles. Debt service will be paid from ad valorem property taxes.  Irrigation - $1,640,000: This portion of the Bonds are being issued for a 16-year period to reimburse the city for the costs related to improvements to the golf course irrigation system. Principal will be paid from property tax abatement and interest will be paid from ad valorem property taxes. Authority: The Bonds are being issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter(s):  429 – Improvement Bonding Authority  444 – Utility Bonding Authority  412.301 – Equipment Certificates  469 – Tax Abatement  475 – General Bonding Authority 2025 Pavement Management Portion: Because the City is assessing at least 20% of the project costs applicable to the portion of Bonds being issued under chapter 429, the Bonds can be a general obligation without a referendum and will not count against the City’s debt limit. Water Tower Portion: Chapter 444 allows cities to issue debt without limitation as long as debt service is expected to be paid from water and sewer revenues. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF PROPOSED DEBT   Presale Report City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota February 5, 2025 Page 2 Equipment Certificate Portion: Chapter 412.301 allows cities to issue “certificates of indebtedness or capital notes” for the purchase of “capital equipment.” If the amount of equipment certificates being issued is more than .25% of the EMV of taxable property in the City, a public notice must be published, and the issue is subject to reverse referendum. The City’s EMV for Pay 2025 is $6,383,697,400. As of February 2, 2025, the City will have $1,695,000 in outstanding equipment certificates. Since the amount of the proposed equipment certificate and existing equipment certificates is below the statutory threshold of $15,959,244, the certificate may be issued without public notice and voter approval. In addition, this portion of the Bonds will count against the Net Debt Limit of 3% of the estimated market value (EMV) of taxable property in the City. Since the Pay 2025 EMV is $6,383,697,400, the debt limit of the City is $191,510,922. Therefore, the proposed debt applicable to the equipment certificates ($1,660,000), plus the City’s current outstanding debt as of February 2, 2025, secured solely from property taxes ($15,815,000) leaves the City with an unused debt limit of $174,035,922. The City is well within the statutory debt limit. Irrigation Portion (Tax Abatement): The City is required to hold a public hearing on the abatement and the public purpose it serves. The hearing will be held on February 19, 2025. In addition, under the Chapter 469.1813, the amount of property taxes abated in any year for the Bonds, together with any outstanding annual abatements, may not exceed: 1) 10% of the City's net tax capacity (NTC) or 2) $200,000, whichever is greater. Since the City’s NTC for Pay 2025 is $62,706,488, the greater amount would be $6,270,649. These annual payment on these Bonds in addition to the outstanding annual abatements is approximately $705,000 which is less than the maximum annual amount allowed under the Tax Abatement Authority. The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which its full faith, credit, and taxing powers are pledged. Term/Call Feature: The Bonds are being issued for a term of 16 years (10 years for the water tower and 5 years for the equipment). Principal on the Bonds will be due on February 1 in the years 2027 through 2041. Interest will be due every six months beginning February 1, 2026. The Bonds relative to the Pavement Management and Water Tower will be subject to prepayment at the discretion of the City on February 1, 2035 or any date thereafter, for maturities on February 1, 2036. Bank Qualification: Because the City is expecting to issue no more than $10,000,000 in tax exempt debt during the calendar year, the City will be able to designate the Bonds as “bank qualified” obligations. Bank qualified status broadens the market for the Bonds, which can result in lower interest rates. Rating: The City’s most recent bond issues were rated by S&P Global Ratings. The current rating on those bonds is “AAA”. The City will request a new rating for the Bonds.   Presale Report City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota February 5, 2025 Page 3 Basis for Recommendation: Based on your objectives, financial situation and need, risk tolerance, liquidity needs, experience with the issuance of Bonds and long-term financial capacity, as well as the tax status considerations related to the Bonds and the structure, timing and other similar matters related to the Bonds, we are recommending the issuance of Bonds as a suitable option. Method of Sale/Placement: We are recommending the Bonds be issued as municipal securities and offered through a competitive underwriting process. You will solicit competitive bids, which we will compile on your behalf, for the purchase of the Bonds from underwriters and banks. An allowance for discount bidding will be incorporated in the terms of the issue. The discount is treated as an interest item and provides the underwriter with all or a portion of their compensation in the transaction. If the Bonds are purchased at a price greater than the minimum bid amount (maximum discount), the unused allowance may be used to reduce your borrowing amount. Premium Pricing: In some cases, investors in municipal bonds prefer “premium” pricing structures. A premium is achieved when the coupon for any maturity (the interest rate paid by the issuer) exceeds the yield to the investor, resulting in a price paid that is greater than the face value of the bonds. The sum of the amounts paid in excess of face value is considered “reoffering premium.” The amount of the premium varies, but it is not uncommon to see premiums for new issues in the range of 2.00% to 10.00% of the face amount of the issue. This means that an issuer with a $2,000,000 offering may receive bids that result in proceeds of $2,040,000 to $2,200,000. For this issue of Bonds we have been directed to review any premium received with staff on the day of sale to determine if they will retain the premium or use it to reduce the size of the Bonds. The resulting adjustments may slightly change the true interest cost of the issue, either up or down. The amount of premium can be restricted in the bid specifications. Restrictions on premium may result in fewer bids, but may also eliminate large adjustments on the day of sale and unintended impacts with respect to debt service payment. Ehlers will identify appropriate premium restrictions for the Bonds intended to achieve the City’s objectives for this financing. Review of Existing Debt: We have reviewed all outstanding indebtedness for the City and find that there are no refunding opportunities at this time. We will continue to monitor the market and the call dates for the City’s outstanding debt and will alert you to any future refunding opportunities.   Presale Report City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota February 5, 2025 Page 4 Continuing Disclosure: Because the City has more than $10,000,000 in outstanding debt subject to a continuing disclosure undertaking (including this issue) and this issue does not meet an available exemption from continuing disclosure, the City will be agreeing to provide certain updated Annual Financial Information and its Audited Financial Statement annually, as well as providing notices of the occurrence of certain reportable events to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (the “MSRB”), as required by rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The City is already obligated to provide such reports for its existing bonds, and has contracted with Ehlers to prepare and file the reports. Arbitrage Monitoring: The City must ensure compliance with certain sections of the Internal Revenue Code and Treasury Regulations (“Arbitrage Rules”) throughout the life of the issue to maintain the tax- exempt status of the Bonds. These Arbitrage Rules apply to amounts held in construction, escrow, reserve, debt service account(s), etc., along with related investment income on each fund/account. IRS audits will verify compliance with rebate, yield restriction and records retention requirements within the Arbitrage Rules. The City’s specific arbitrage responsibilities will be detailed in the Nonarbitrage Certificate (the “Tax Compliance Document”) prepared by your Bond Attorney and provided at closing. The Bonds may qualify for one or more exception(s) to the Arbitrage Rules by meeting 1) small issuer exception, 2) spend down requirements, 3) bona fide debt service fund limits, 4) reasonable reserve requirements, 5) expenditure within an available period limitations, 6) investments yield restrictions, 7) de minimis rules, or; 8) borrower limited requirements. An Ehlers arbitrage expert will contact the City within 30 days after the sale date to review the City’s specific responsibilities for the Bonds. The City is currently receiving arbitrage services from Ehlers in relation to the Bonds. Investment of Bond Proceeds: Ehlers will work with the City in developing a strategy to invest your Bond proceeds until the funds are needed to pay project costs. Risk Factors: Special Assessments: At the direction of staff, we have assumed 15% of the special assessments will be prepaid for the 429 portion of the Bonds and we have assumed that the remaining assessments have been levied as projected. If the City receives a significant amount more of pre-paid assessments or does not levy the assessments, it may need to increase the levy portion of the debt service to make up for lower interest earnings than the expected assessment interest rate.   Presale Report City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota February 5, 2025 Page 5 Other Service Providers: This debt issuance will require the engagement of other public finance service providers. This section identifies those other service providers, so Ehlers can coordinate their engagement on your behalf. Where you have previously used a particular firm to provide a service, we have assumed that you will continue that relationship. For services you have not previously required, we have identified a service provider. Fees charged by these service providers will be paid from proceeds of the obligation, unless you notify us that you wish to pay them from other sources. Our pre-sale bond sizing includes a good faith estimate of these fees, but the final fees may vary. If you have any questions pertaining to the identified service providers or their role, or if you would like to use a different service provider for any of the listed services please contact us. Bond Counsel: Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP Paying Agent: Bond Trust Services Corporation Rating Agency: Standard & Poor's Global Ratings (S&P) Summary: The decisions to be made by the City Council are as follows:  Accept or modify the finance assumptions described in this report  Adopt the resolution attached to this report.   Presale Report City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota February 5, 2025 Page 6 Pre-Sale Review by City Council: February 5, 2025 Distribute Official Statement: By Early February 2025 Public Hearing on Tax Abatement: February 19, 2025 Conference with Rating Agency and Due Diligence Call to Review Official Statement: February 19, 2025 City Council Meeting to Award Sale of the Bonds: March 5, 2025 Estimated Closing Date: March 25, 2025 Attachments Estimated Sources and Uses of Funds Estimated Proposed Debt Service Schedule Resolution Authorizing Ehlers to Proceed with Bond Sale EHLERS’ CONTACTS Stacie Kvilvang, Senior Municipal Advisor (651) 697-8506 Keith Dahl, Municipal Advisor (651) 697-8595 Jason Aarsvold, Senior Municipal Advisor (651) 697-8512 Tess Kuhn, Public Finance Analyst (651) 697-8518 Alicia Gage, Senior Financial Analyst (651) 697-8551 PROPOSED DEBT ISSUANCE SCHEDULE EHLERS’ CONTACTS City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota $10,000,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2025A Issue Summary Assumes Current Market BQ AAA Rates +50bps Total Issue Sources And Uses Dated 03/25/2025 | Delivered 03/25/2025 Pavement Management Equipment Water Tower Tax Abatement - Irrigation Issue Summary Sources Of Funds Par Amount of Bonds $2,915,000.00 $1,660,000.00 $3,785,000.00 $1,640,000.00 $10,000,000.00 Total Sources $2,915,000.00 $1,660,000.00 $3,785,000.00 $1,640,000.00 $10,000,000.00 Uses Of Funds Total Underwriter's Discount (1.200%)34,980.00 19,920.00 45,420.00 19,680.00 120,000.00 Costs of Issuance 37,603.50 21,414.00 48,826.50 21,156.00 129,000.00 Deposit to Capitalized Interest (CIF) Fund 92,373.75 48,679.50 --141,053.25 Deposit to Project Construction Fund 2,749,000.00 1,570,000.00 3,690,000.00 1,600,000.00 9,609,000.00 Rounding Amount 1,042.75 (13.50)753.50 (836.00)946.75 Total Uses $2,915,000.00 $1,660,000.00 $3,785,000.00 $1,640,000.00 $10,000,000.00 Series 2025A GO Bonds - P | Issue Summary | 1/14/2025 | 9:27 AM City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota $10,000,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2025A Issue Summary Assumes Current Market BQ AAA Rates +50bps Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 03/25/2025 ----- 02/01/2026 --307,088.01 307,088.01 307,088.01 08/01/2026 --180,640.00 180,640.00 - 02/01/2027 870,000.00 3.450%180,640.00 1,050,640.00 1,231,280.00 08/01/2027 --165,632.50 165,632.50 - 02/01/2028 900,000.00 3.450%165,632.50 1,065,632.50 1,231,265.00 08/01/2028 --150,107.50 150,107.50 - 02/01/2029 925,000.00 3.450%150,107.50 1,075,107.50 1,225,215.00 08/01/2029 --134,151.25 134,151.25 - 02/01/2030 960,000.00 3.450%134,151.25 1,094,151.25 1,228,302.50 08/01/2030 --117,591.25 117,591.25 - 02/01/2031 990,000.00 3.450%117,591.25 1,107,591.25 1,225,182.50 08/01/2031 --100,513.75 100,513.75 - 02/01/2032 665,000.00 3.450%100,513.75 765,513.75 866,027.50 08/01/2032 --89,042.50 89,042.50 - 02/01/2033 685,000.00 3.550%89,042.50 774,042.50 863,085.00 08/01/2033 --76,883.75 76,883.75 - 02/01/2034 705,000.00 3.550%76,883.75 781,883.75 858,767.50 08/01/2034 --64,370.00 64,370.00 - 02/01/2035 735,000.00 3.750%64,370.00 799,370.00 863,740.00 08/01/2035 --50,588.75 50,588.75 - 02/01/2036 760,000.00 3.800%50,588.75 810,588.75 861,177.50 08/01/2036 --36,148.75 36,148.75 - 02/01/2037 335,000.00 3.850%36,148.75 371,148.75 407,297.50 08/01/2037 --29,700.00 29,700.00 - 02/01/2038 345,000.00 3.950%29,700.00 374,700.00 404,400.00 08/01/2038 --22,886.25 22,886.25 - 02/01/2039 360,000.00 4.000%22,886.25 382,886.25 405,772.50 08/01/2039 --15,686.25 15,686.25 - 02/01/2040 375,000.00 4.050%15,686.25 390,686.25 406,372.50 08/01/2040 --8,092.50 8,092.50 - 02/01/2041 390,000.00 4.150%8,092.50 398,092.50 406,185.00 Total $10,000,000.00 -$2,791,158.01 $12,791,158.01 - Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $74,980.00 Average Life 7.498 Years Average Coupon 3.7225367% Net Interest Cost (NIC)3.8825794% True Interest Cost (TIC)3.8956791% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 3.7037301% All Inclusive Cost (AIC)4.1058182% IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost 3.7225367% Weighted Average Maturity 7.498 Years Series 2025A GO Bonds - P | Issue Summary | 1/14/2025 | 9:27 AM City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota $10,000,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2025A Issue Summary Assumes Current Market BQ AAA Rates +50bps Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I CIF Net New D/S 105% of Total Water Revenue Tax Abatement Revenue (Irrigation)Levy/ (Surplus) 02/01/2026 --307,088.01 307,088.01 (141,053.25)166,034.76 174,336.50 119,775.74 -54,560.76 02/01/2027 870,000.00 3.450%361,280.00 1,231,280.00 -1,231,280.00 1,292,844.00 482,162.63 85,000.00 725,681.38 02/01/2028 900,000.00 3.450%331,265.00 1,231,265.00 -1,231,265.00 1,292,828.25 480,889.50 90,000.00 721,938.75 02/01/2029 925,000.00 3.450%300,215.00 1,225,215.00 -1,225,215.00 1,286,475.75 479,254.13 90,000.00 717,221.63 02/01/2030 960,000.00 3.450%268,302.50 1,228,302.50 -1,228,302.50 1,289,717.63 477,256.50 95,000.00 717,461.13 02/01/2031 990,000.00 3.450%235,182.50 1,225,182.50 -1,225,182.50 1,286,441.63 480,146.63 95,000.00 711,295.00 02/01/2032 665,000.00 3.450%201,027.50 866,027.50 -866,027.50 909,328.88 482,493.38 100,000.00 326,835.50 02/01/2033 685,000.00 3.550%178,085.00 863,085.00 -863,085.00 906,239.25 479,046.75 105,000.00 322,192.50 02/01/2034 705,000.00 3.550%153,767.50 858,767.50 -858,767.50 901,705.88 480,073.13 105,000.00 316,632.75 02/01/2035 735,000.00 3.750%128,740.00 863,740.00 -863,740.00 906,927.00 480,540.38 110,000.00 316,386.63 02/01/2036 760,000.00 3.800%101,177.50 861,177.50 -861,177.50 904,236.38 479,556.00 115,000.00 309,680.38 02/01/2037 335,000.00 3.850%72,297.50 407,297.50 -407,297.50 427,662.38 -120,000.00 307,662.38 02/01/2038 345,000.00 3.950%59,400.00 404,400.00 -404,400.00 424,620.00 -125,000.00 299,620.00 02/01/2039 360,000.00 4.000%45,772.50 405,772.50 -405,772.50 426,061.13 -130,000.00 296,061.13 02/01/2040 375,000.00 4.050%31,372.50 406,372.50 -406,372.50 426,691.13 -135,000.00 291,691.13 02/01/2041 390,000.00 4.150%16,185.00 406,185.00 -406,185.00 426,494.25 -140,000.00 286,494.25 Total $10,000,000.00 -$2,791,158.01 $12,791,158.01 (141,053.25)$12,650,104.76 $13,282,610.00 $4,921,194.74 $1,640,000.00 $6,721,415.26 Significant Dates Dated 3/25/2025 First Coupon Date 2/01/2026 Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $74,980.00 Average Life 7.498 Years Average Coupon 3.7225367% Net Interest Cost (NIC)3.8825794% True Interest Cost (TIC)3.8956791% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 3.7037301% All Inclusive Cost (AIC)4.1058182% Series 2025A GO Bonds - P | Issue Summary | 1/14/2025 | 9:27 AM City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota $10,000,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2025A Issue Summary Assumes Current Market BQ AAA Rates +50bps Detail Costs Of Issuance Dated 03/25/2025 | Delivered 03/25/2025 COSTS OF ISSUANCE DETAIL Municipal Advisor $79,000.00 Bond Counsel $24,000.00 Rating Agency Fee $24,000.00 Miscellaneous $2,000.00 TOTAL $129,000.00 Series 2025A GO Bonds - P | Issue Summary | 1/14/2025 | 9:27 AM 171037908v1 EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA HELD: FEBRUARY 5, 2025 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular or special meeting of the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, Washington County, Minnesota, was duly held at City Hall on February 5, 2025, at 7:00 P.M., for the purpose, in part, of authorizing the competitive negotiated sale of $10,000,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2025A. The following members were present: and the following were absent: Member ________________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2025-11 RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE SALE OF $10,000,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2025A A. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota (the "City") has heretofore determined that it is necessary and expedient to issue the City's $10,000,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2025A (the "Bonds"), to finance (i) the City's 2025 pavement management projects; (ii) a new water tower; (iii) the acquisition of capital equipment; and (iv) improvements to the golf course irrigation system, all within the City; and B. WHEREAS, the City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc., in Roseville, Minnesota ("Ehlers"), as its independent municipal advisor for the Bonds in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2(9). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Authorization. The City Council hereby authorizes Ehlers to assist the City for the sale of the Bonds. 2. Meeting; Proposal Opening. The City Council shall meet at 7:00 P.M. on March 5, 2025, for the purpose of considering proposals for and awarding the sale of the Bonds. 3. Official Statement. In connection with said sale, the officers or employees of the City are hereby authorized to cooperate with Ehlers and participate in the preparation of an official statement for the Bonds and to execute and deliver it on behalf of the City upon its completion. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member _______________________ and, after full discussion thereof and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following Council Members voted in favor thereof: 171037908v1 2 and the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 171037908v1 3 STATE OF MINNESOTA WASHINGTON COUNTY CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes with the original thereof on file in my office, and that the same is a full, true and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City Council, duly called and held on the date therein indicated, insofar as the minutes relate to providing for the issuance and sale of $10,000,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2025A. WITNESS my hand on February 5, 2025. __________________________________________ City Clerk 1 City Council Action Request 7.M. Meeting Date 2/5/2025 Department Community Development Agenda Category Action Item Title Prairie Dunes – Final Plat, Development Agreement, and Development Plans Staff Recommendation 1) Adopt Resolution 2025-013 approving the Final Plat for Prairie Dunes 1st Addition. 2) Approve the Prairie Dunes 1st Addition Development Agreement with Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC, with minor modifications as approved by the City Attorney. 3) Adopt Resolution 2025-014 approving the Prairie Dunes 1st Addition Development Plans dated December 13, 2024, prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., subject to final approval by the City Engineer in writing. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. Prairie Dunes 1st CC Memo 2. Prairie Dunes 1st Resolution - Final Plat 3. Prairie Dunes 1st Final Plat 4. Prairie Dunes 1st Development Agreement 5. Prairie Dunes 1st Resolution - Plans & Specs 6. Prairie Dunes 1st Application Narrative 7. Prairie Dunes 1st Final Grading Plans 8. Prairie Dunes 1st Utility Plans 9. Prairie Dunes 1st Storm Sewer Design 10. Prairie Dunes 1st Micro Drainage 11. Prairie Dunes 1st Landscape Plans 12. Prairie Dunes 1st Road Access 13. Prairie Dunes 1st Fire Hydrants 14. Prairie Dunes 1st Engineer Review Memo 2025-01-23 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator FROM: Samantha Pierret, Senior Planner DATE: January 29, 2025 RE: Prairie Dunes – Final Plat, Development Agreement, and Development Plans Proposal The City Council is requested to take the following actions: 1. Adopt the resolution approving the Final Plat for Prairie Dunes. 2. Approve the Prairie Dunes Development Agreement with Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC. 3. Adopt the resolution approving the Prairie Dunes Development Plans dated December 13, 2024 prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Location Map Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Jennifer Levitt Prairie Dunes –Final Plat, Development Agreement, and Development Plans January 29, 2025 Page 2 of 3 1. Final Plat Background At its August 21, 2024, meeting, the City Council approved Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC’s application for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Plat, Zoning Amendment, and Planned Unit Development (PUD) for a project to be known as Prairie Dunes. A letter was sent to staff from the Metropolitan Council approving the Comprehensive Plan amendment on September 11, 2024. The subject site is located south and west of the NorthPoint Development, east of the DNR owned Scientific and Natural Area (SNA), and west of the Graymont Village residential development. The preliminary plat consists of 162 single family homes on approximately 60 acres. The Prairie Dunes first addition final plat has been phased to include only 120 lots of the 162 lots proposed in the preliminary plat. Prairie Dunes Preliminary Plat Final Plat Review The Prairie Dunes Final Plat was distributed to City departments, Washington County, and ISD 833 for their review and comments. No comments or recommendations were received. The Prairie Dunes first addition final plat will include 120 single-family lots of the 162 lots approved in the preliminary plat. The final plat contains 5 outlots. Outlots A, C, and D will be deeded to the City. Outlot E will be retained by the developer for the second phase of development . Outlot B was originally proposed to be maintained by an HOA however the developer and NorthPoint Development (east side of Hadley Avenue) have been discussing Outlot B being deeded to NorthPoint to include in their property holdings. Language has been included in the Development Agreement clarifying required ownership of Outlot B. Outlot D will contain a recreational trail constructed by the developer that will have internal neighborhood connections adjacent to the SNA. The final plat is in conformance with all other conditions of the preliminary plat as approved by the City Council and as stipulated in Resolution 2024-119. Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Jennifer Levitt Prairie Dunes –Final Plat, Development Agreement, and Development Plans January 29, 2025 Page 3 of 3 Prairie Dunes Final Plat Homeowner’s Association If Outlot B is deeded to NorthPoint, the Applicant would not need a homeowner’s association (HOA) given there will be no common owned elements of the proposed project. 2. Development Agreement The Developer has signed the development agreement, which is attached for review. 3. Development Plan Review The City Engineer has reviewed the development plans dated December 13, 2024, by the developer’s consulting engineer Westwood Professional Services, Inc., and is recommending approval of those plans (e.g., construction plans, drawings, specifications, surveys) subject to the comments in the January 23, 2025, review memorandum and any subsequential memorandums from Stantec, or as modified and approved by the City Engineer in writing. Recommendation The City Council is recommended to take the following actions: 1. Adopt Resolution 2025-013 approving the Final Plat for Prairie Dunes. 2. Approve the Prairie Dunes Development Agreement with Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC, with minor modifications as approved by the City Attorney. 3. Adopt Resolution 2025-014 approving the Prairie Dunes Development Plans dated December 13, 2024 prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., subject to final approval by the City Engineer in writing. CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2025-013 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT NAMED PRAIRIE DUNES WHEREAS, Pulte Group has applied for a final plat to develop a residential subdivision named Prairie Dunes. This subdivision plat consists of 120 detached single-family homes and is located on the 60.2-acre property legally described as: Lot A Subdivision Cd 3570 Subdivision Name Preserve at Prairie Dunes, Washington County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held the public hearing for the preliminary plat, Planned Unit Development, Comprehensive Plan Amendment, and a zoning amendment to change the zoning from AG-2, Agriculture, to R-4, Transitional Residential, for the proposed Prairie Dunes subdivision on July 22, 2024; and WHEREAS, the City Council subsequently accepted the Planning Commission's recommen- dations and approved the comprehensive plan amendment (Resolution 2024-118), preliminary plat (Resolution No. 2024-119), and the zoning amendment (Ordinance No. 1084) on August 15, 2024; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council approved the comprehensive plan amendment on September 11, 2024; and WHEREAS, City staff found the Prairie Dunes final plat substantially consistent with the approved preliminary plat plan; and WHEREAS, the Developer, Property Owner, and City have entered into a development agreement for the Subdivision (“Development Agreement”). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, Washington County, Minnesota, hereby approves the final plat for a residential subdivision plat named “Prairie Dunes.” This plat consists of 120 detached single-family homes, located on the property legally described above. Approval of this final plat is subject to the following conditions: 1. The Developer and builders must comply with all City ordinances and policies. 2. The Developer must abide by the conditions stipulated in Resolution No. 2024-119, which approved the Prairie Dunes preliminary plat, except as hereafter modified. 3. All utility, drainage, and development construction must conform to the development plans and specifications dated December 13, 2024, prepared by the developer’s consulting engineer, Westwood Professional Services, Inc. and are subject to the comments in the January 23, 2025, review memorandum and any subsequential memorandums from Stantec, or as modified and approved by the City Engineer in writing. City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota City Council Resolution 2025-013 Page 2 of 3 4. The Developer may start rough grading of the lots before the plat is filed, if a Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Construction Storm Water Permit has been issued and the City has been furnished with a cash escrow or letter of credit in the minimum amount specified in the approved development agreement. 5. Development of this project must comply with the grading and erosion control plans as approved by the City Engineer. After the site is rough graded, but before any utility construction commences or building permits are issued, the erosion control plan shall be implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if it is determined that the methods implemented are insufficient to properly control erosion. 6. The City will supply the street light poles and luminaries. The Developer will pay the City for street light poles and street light luminaries. 7. The final plat must be recorded with the Washington County Recorder’s Office before any building permit can be issued. 8. The builder for each lot shall post a letter of credit or cash escrow to the City for the estimated cost of the required yard trees, sod, shrubs and final as-built survey on each lot. 9. Before final financial guarantees are released, a certificate signed by a registered en- gineer must be provided. This certificate will state that all final lot and building grades are in conformance to the grading and drainage development plan(s) approved by the City Engineer. 10. Residential lots designated to have a boundary marker(s) must have the marker(s) installed before a Certificate of Occupancy can be issued for the house on that partic- ular residential lot. For lots constructed between October 2 and May 31, a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy can be issued, and the escrow retained until installation of the markers is confirmed. 11. The Developer is responsible for the cost and installation of the required park and open space boundary markers. 12. All monument signs must comply with the City’s Sign Ordinance and must be placed on private property. 13. Park dedication shall be addressed as stipulated within the Development Agreement. 14. Prior to the release of the final plat, a final landscaping plan shall be approved in writing by planning staff. City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota City Council Resolution 2025-013 Page 3 of 3 15. All mailboxes and location of mailboxes must comply with the U.S. Post Office guide- lines and regulations. Mailboxes placed at the curb shall all be the same design and color. Passed this 5th day of February 2025. Myron Bailey, Mayor Attest: Tamara Anderson, City Clerk Sheet 1 of 5 SheetsPRAIRIE DUNESCITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAThis plat was approved by the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota this day of , 20 , and hereby certifiescompliance with all requirements as set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subdivision 2.By By Mayor ClerkCOUNTY SURVEYORPursuant to Chapter 820, Laws of Minnesota, 1971, and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this day of , 20.By By Washington County Surveyor COUNTY AUDITOR/TREASURERPursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable in the year 20 on the land hereinbefore described have been paid. Also, pursuant to MinnesotaStatutes, Section 272.12, there are no delinquent taxes and transfer has been entered on this day of , 20.By By Washington County Auditor/Treasurer DeputyCOUNTY RECORDERDocument Number I hereby certify that this instrument was recorded in the Office of the County Recorder for record on this day of , 20,at o'clock .M., and was duly recorded in Washington County Records.By By Washington County Recorder DeputyKNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: that Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, owner of the following described property situated in theCounty of Washington, State of Minnesota, to wit:Outlot A, PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES, according to the recorded plat thereof, Washington County, MinnesotaHas caused the same to be surveyed and platted as PRAIRIE DUNES and does hereby donate and dedicate the public ways, as shown on this plat and also dedicate the easementsas created by this plat for drainage and utility purposes only.In witness whereof said Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of, 20 .PULTE HOMES OF MINNESOTA LLCBy STATE OF COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of , 20 , by , its of Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. (Signature)(Name Printed)Notary Public, County, My Commission Expires I hereby certify that I have surveyed and platted or directly supervised the survey and platting of the property described on this plat as PRAIRIE DUNES that I am a duly LicensedLand Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on theplat; that all monuments depicted on the plat have been or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section505.01, Subd. 3 existing as of the date of this certification are shown and labeled on the plat; and that all public ways are shown and labeled on the plat.Dated this , day of , 20Mathew J. Welinski, Licensed Land SurveyorMinnesota License No. 53596STATE OF MINNESOTACOUNTY OF The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate was acknowledged before me on this day of , 20 , by Mathew J. Welinski, a Licensed LandSurveyor, Minnesota License No. 53596. (Signature)(Name Printed)Notary Public, County, MinnesotaMy Commission Expires 12345678910111213141512345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728291234567891011121314151234567891012345678910123456789101112123221918171615141312111222435566OUTLOT COUTLOT BOUTLOT D30333132212011OUTLOT A161716171823243412OUTLOT D7OUTLOT EOUTLOT D100 100603333S00°43'43"W 3927.06N16°07'38"W 4084.09 N89°51'07"E 1260.35 N89°55'06"W75.972139.522066.96S78°02'57"W 283.16N89°16'17"W 331.05 N00°43'43"E99.03N89°51'07"E 68.01 357.171430.361185.35 75.01N00°43'43"E 1320.24S89°56'25"W 108.49N00°03'35"W110.00S89°56'25"W34.99517.85699.04103.34631.32701.04684.77 S89°51'07"W 304.07 S83°45'16"W 278.94N89°16'17"W 260.00 N89°16'17"W80.00N85°13'24"W30.08N73°52'22"E140.00S37°55'35"W37.06∆=15°58'45"L=139.44R=500.00S73°52'22"W15.94S89°16'17"E105.14S85°59'45"W155.61N83°45'16"E143.69N81°41'12"W31.49N73°03'28"E30.00S83°45'16"W60.00Found 1/2 Inch Solid PipeFound 5/8Inch RebarFound MonumentInscribed License No. 43055Found MonumentInscribed License No. 43055Found MonumentInscribed License No. 43055SE Corner of the SW 1/4 ofSection 29, Twp. 27, Rge. 21Found Washington County Cast Iron MonumentN00°43'43"E 33.00 Easement for Electric Transmission in favor ofNorthern States Power Company perDocument No. 202442 (Book 222, Page 280N89°56'25"E 110.00 37.537.537.5 37.5 Easement for Electric Transmission in favor ofNorthern States Power Company perDocument No. 202442 (Book 222, Page 280Drainage & Utility Easementover all of Outlot E0150300450Sheet 2 of 5 SheetsPRAIRIE DUNESSET 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON PIPEWITH CAP INSCRIBED #53596FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED ON PLATSCALE IN FEETSCALE: 1 INCH = 150 FEET(NOT TO SCALE)CITY OF COTTAGE GROVESECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 27, RANGE 21VICINITY MAPSITE29100TH STREET S 110TH STREET S IDEAL AVENUE SHADLEY AVE S105TH STREET S THE ORIENTATION OF THIS BEARING SYSTEM IS BASED ONTHE NORTH LINE OF OUTLOT A, PRESERVE AT PRAIRIEDUNES, WHICH IS ASSUMED TO BEAR N 89°51'07" EFOUND WASHINGTON COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENTHADLEY AVE S.INSET A(SEE SHEET 3 OF 5 SHEETS)INSET B(SEE SHEET 4 OF 5 SHEETS)INSET C(SEE SHEET 5 OF 5 SHEETS) 123456789101112131415123456789123456789101112131415123456221912452120OUTLOT A16171617182324OUTLOT DN16°07'38"W 631.32N89°51'07"E 1185.35S89°51'07"W 792.84N00°43'43"E 517.23 S00°43'43"W 330.04S89°51'07"W 304.07S20°14'58"E 126.36∆=10°52'02"R=300.00L=56.90∆=9°14'03"R=600.00L=96.70∆=4°07'20"R=600.00L=43.17∆=15°58'45"R=500.00L=139.44S11°00'55"E 201.08S89°16'17"E80.00180.02337.21 40.0040.0040.0040.00462.80330.04S85°13'24"E30.08S37°55'35"W37.06 S73°52'22"W15.94S16°07'38"E9.7679.34121.74S78°59'05"W43.73N78°59'05"E2.67N41°43'02"E60.00 S65°33'04"E57.81S73°52'22"W20.00303030303030303030303030303030304040404062.6246.1846.1846.1846.1846.1846.1846.1846.1846.1846.1846.1846.1846.1846.1844.10∆=0°21'40"L=2.08∆=10°30'22"L=60.5113.732.31∆=33°59'06"R=100.00L=59.32 ∆=101°05'36"L=105.86110.5046.1846.1846.1846.1846.1846.1846.1846.1846.1846.1846.1846.1846.1846.1846.1864.91150.02 N00°08'53"W15.88S00°08'53"E 150.00 S00°08'53"E 150.00 S00°08'53"E 150.00 S00°08'53"E 150.00 S00°08'53"E 150.00 S00°08'53"E 150.00 S00°08'53"E 150.00 S00°08'53"E 150.00 S00°08'53"E 150.00 S00°08'53"E 150.00 S00°08'53"E 150.00 S00°08'53"E 150.00 S00°08'53"E 150.00 S00°08'53"E 150.00 S00°08'53"E 150.00 S00°08'53"E 150.01 ∆=19°12'20"L=20.1120.00N00°08'53"W15.04∆=67°26'55"L=70.63∆=63°30'18"L=66.50∆=1°34'40"L=2.75∆=35°41'23"L=62.295.7465.7632.69∆=3°00'06"L=33.01∆=6°13'57"L=68.5367.6958.67∆=0°42'13"L=7.00∆=3°25'07"L=34.0131.5165.5065.5067.5168.4965.5065.5065.5065.5096.59N73°52'22"E 138.99N73°52'22"E 134.31N73°52'22"E 128.24N73°52'22"E 133.23N73°52'22"E 139.09N73°52'22"E 126.09N73°52'22"E 124.22N73°52'22"E 129.44N73°52'22"E 140.00196.3613.73∆=10°52'02"L=51.2118.0946.3046.3046.3046.3046.3046.30136.4766.4646.3246.3246.3264.61132.3445.0045.0045.007.18∆=3°53'52"L=36.06∆=4°38'46"L=42.98∆=5°56'58"L=55.03∆=2°17'50"L=25.26126.36∆=9°14'03"L=91.8749.3466.64 46.32 46.32 46.32 64.38 S89°16'17"E 133.34S89°16'17"E 134.05S89°16'17"E 134.76S89°16'17"E 135.47N00°08'53"W 135.00 N00°08'53"W 135.00 N00°08'53"W 135.00 N00°08'53"W 135.00 N00°08'53"W 135.00 N00°08'53"W 138.94 S08°41'32"E 142.46S04°02'46"E 136.54N00°08'53"W 135.00 N00°08'53"W 135.00 N00°08'53"W 135.00 N00°08'53"W 135.00 N00°08'53"W 135.0048.9735.9010.6146.3046.3046.3046.3046.30S83°32'53"W 84.8854.6052.5045.0045.0045.00N89°51'07"E 242.09130.0262.1246.5050.5050.5046.5046.50 46.50 46.50 50.50 50.50 46.50 66.10 130.0264.1146.5050.5050.5046.5046.50N89°16'17"W 130.00N89°16'17"W 130.00N89°16'17"W 130.00N89°16'17"W 130.00N89°16'17"W 130.00N89°16'17"W 130.00N89°16'17"W 130.00N89°16'17"W 130.00N89°16'17"W 130.00N89°16'17"W 130.00N89°16'17"W 130.00N89°16'17"W 130.00N00°43'43"E 304.61 S16°07'38"E 625.5920.80∆=37°16'03"R=100.00L=65.04∆=251°15'09"R=60.00L=263.11 10 10 10 10 10 10 Drainage& UtilityEasementDrainage& UtilityEasementDrainage& UtilityEasement20101010101010Drainage & UtilityEasementDrainage & UtilityEasement101010101010101010Drainage& UtilityEasementDrainage& UtilityEasementDrainage& UtilityEasement1010101010101010 10 1010 Drainage& UtilityEasementDrainage& UtilityEasementDrainage& UtilityEasementIngress & Egress Easement perDoc Nos. 3079455 & 302059010151515151010101515110.11114.56117.68120.79Drainage & Utility Easementover all of Outlot ADrainage & Utility Easementover all of Outlot D04080120Sheet 3 of 5 SheetsPRAIRIE DUNESSET 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON PIPEWITH CAP INSCRIBED #53596FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED ON PLATSCALE IN FEETSCALE: 1 INCH = 40 FEETTHE ORIENTATION OF THIS BEARING SYSTEM IS BASED ONTHE NORTH LINE OF OUTLOT A, PRESERVE AT PRAIRIEDUNES, WHICH IS ASSUMED TO BEAR N 89°51'07" EINSET A(FROM SHEET 2 OF 5 SHEETS) 10111213141516171819202122272829123456789107891018171615141312112235OUTLOT C30333132113412OUTLOT DS89°51'07"W 304.07∆=15°58'45"R=500.00L=139.44S73°52'22"W15.94S16°07'38"E 167.84∆=74°01'15"R=200.00L=258.38S89°51'07"W 543.55S00°43'43"W 411.88 N00°43'43"E 522.86∆=15°10'06 " L=176.58 R=667.00 CB=N8°18' 4 6 " E CL=176.06 S16°56'32"E 207.59∆=17°40'15"R=330.00L=101.78S37°55'35"W37.06 S85°13'24"E30.08S89°16'17"E 80.0040.0040.00N88°27'53"E 105.2141.9363.29S83°45'16"W 278.94258.7420.20N83°45'16"E 60.00N73°03'28"E30.00S81°41'12"E31.49330.0481.84 200.00 322.86 30303030303030303030303030304040404040213.51330.04S73°52'22"W20.00N16°07'38"W 701.0422.8551.77∆=11°16'34"L=45.26∆=14°38'14"L=58.76∆=14°38'14"L=58.76∆=14°38'14"L=58.76∆=14°38'14"L=58.76∆=4°11'47"L=16.85131.2751.38∆=5°30'36"L=34.62∆=11°11'15"L=70.29∆=0°58'23"L=6.1165.1144.50∆=30°34'10"L=26.68∆=32°23'42"L=28.2770.67 70.67 20.50 79.6580.2349.98 100.0220.49107.70N83°45'16"E 184.29N83°45'16"E 168.43N83°45'16"E 145.55N83°45'16"E 132.37N00°08'53"W 150.00 N04°02'54"E 151.02 N18°41'07"E 166.95N33°19'21"E 193.29 N47°57'35"E 181.36 N62°35'48"E 147.28N73°52'22"E 140.00N73°52'22"E 140.00N73°52'22"E 140.00S16°07'38"E 343.77S32°36'46"E47.13S63°25'06"E47.62N78°02'00"W 128.20N89°51'07"E 159.88S01°39'03"W 161.84S07°08'08"E70.01106.0088.8565.5065.5065.5065.5015.0817.92∆=52° 1 6 ' 0 4 " C B = S 1 9 ° 5 3 ' 1 8 " W CL= 5 2 . 8 6 R=6 0 . 0 0 L=5 4 . 7 3N83°45'16"E 143.6974.0745.5018.06∆=21°13'47"L=62.99∆=35°18'57"L=104.78∆=17°28'31"L=51.8550.0050.0061.12135.02 135.02 65.2550.0050.0087.8920.47∆=14°15'53"L=117.0263.1850.0050.0033.8645.5650.55S73°52'22"W 132.44S73°52'22"W 130.13S52°38'35"W 135.00 S17°1 9 ' 3 8 " W 1 3 3 . 3 1 S00°08'53"E 135.00 S00°08'53"E 135.00 S00°08'53"E 135.00 S00°08'53"E 135.00 S00°08'53"E 135.00 N13°13'20"W 96.11S00°08'53"E 135.00 N29°23'41"W31.57N50°46'15"W21.81S89°51'07"W 197.052N89°16'17"W 130.00N89°16'17"W 130.00N89°16'17"W 130.00N89°16'17"W 130.00N89°16'17"W 130.00N89°16'17"W 130.00N89°16'17"W 130.00N89°16'17"W 130.00N89°16'17"W 130.00N89°16'17"W 130.00N89°16'17"W 130.00N89°16'17"W 130.0046.5046.5046.5046.5046.5064.95 130.02130.0260.97 46.50 46.50 46.50 46.50 46.50 46.5046.5046.5046.5046.5062.96 N00°43'43"E 295.46 62.4545.1945.1945.1962.0052.30 ∆=15°28'35"L=81.03∆=2°11'41"L=11.4987.1268.8251.658.9327.94 132.5253.1545.1945.1945.1960.43N00°08'53"W 132.50 N00°08'53"W 132.50 N00°08'53"W 132.50 N00°08'53"W 132.50S73°03'28"W 204 .87S73°03'28"W 230 .27 ∆=5°53'27" L=64.47 ∆=9°16'3 9 " L=101.5 2 S89°51'07"W 249.15S85°59'45"W 155.61CL=13.52CB=N10°28'23"W∆=12°56'17"R=60.00L=13.55N15°53'49"E12.56N78°02'00"W 197.14N89°51'07"E 137.18S00°02'35"E 146.88S07°22'47"E67.05407.44293.60N00°43'43"E 694.88 10101010101010101010Drainage &Utility EasementDrainage& UtilityEasementDrainage& UtilityEasement1010 10Drainage& UtilityEasementDrainage& UtilityEasementDrainage& UtilityEasementDrainage& UtilityEasement10101010Drainage& UtilityEasementDrainage& UtilityEasementDrainage& UtilityEasement101010101010Drainage& UtilityEasementDrainage& UtilityEasement1010Drainage& UtilityEasement1010101010Drainage & Utility Easementover all of Outlot DDrainage & Utility Easementover all of Outlot C202020252525 151510101041.6659.4265.6504080120Sheet 4 of 5 SheetsPRAIRIE DUNESSET 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON PIPEWITH CAP INSCRIBED #53596FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED ON PLATSCALE IN FEETSCALE: 1 INCH = 40 FEETTHE ORIENTATION OF THIS BEARING SYSTEM IS BASED ONTHE NORTH LINE OF OUTLOT A, PRESERVE AT PRAIRIEDUNES, WHICH IS ASSUMED TO BEAR N 89°51'07" EINSET B(FROM SHEET 2 OF 5 SHEETS) 2324252612345678910111212366OUTLOT D7N16°07'38"W 684.77S00°43'43"W 357.17N89°51'07"E 351.24S00°43'43"W 113.73 N00°08'53"W30.00N63°06'45"W 60.00N00°08'53"W30.00 S83°45'16"W 278.94N88°27'53"E 105.21N83°45'16"E 60.00S81°41'12"E31.49N73°03'28"E30.00CL=119.98CB=N84°52'30"E∆=177°45'30"R=60.00L=186.15∆=44°45'51"L=46.88∆=44°45'51"L=46.88∆=44°45 '51 "L=46.88 ∆=43° 2 7 ' 5 8 " L=45 . 5 2N83°45'16"E 143.69S85°59'45"W 155.61N38 ° 5 9 ' 2 5 " E 1 4 3 . 3 8 N50°32'17"W 145.23N05°46'26"W 144.89S28°37'40"E 70.48S50°44'48"E 89.01S73°23'31"E 71.89N86°42'16"E 164.9645.0044.0145.67119.29N07°08'08"W45.95 S2 6 ° 1 6 ' 4 4 " W 8 6 . 8 8 S00°41'37"W 243.37 N15° 5 3 ' 4 9 " E 40.55N89°56'25"E11.51∆=7°52'2 2 " CB=S11 ° 5 7 ' 3 7 " W CL=67. 2 8 R=490. 0 2 L=67.3 3 45. 3 5 41. 5 3 29.32364.80N46°18'57"E 225.85 N89°51'07"E 190.22S50°44'48"E 96.93S28°37'40"E 78.14S07°22'47"E50.10S73°23'31"E 82.0220.20258.7430.08319.98N16°07'38"W 270.80N25°00'46"E 94.73 N46°18'57"E 124.78 N89°51'07"E 264.24N76°22'54"E 81.98S78°02'57"W 283.16N00°43'43"E 99.03N89°51'07"E68.01159.1177.3865.2565.2561.13∆=4°37'13"L=4.84∆=43°35'13"L=45.64∆=42°16'38"L=44.27∆=42°16'38"L=44.27∆=42°16'38"L=44.27∆=67°55'33"L=71.13∆=1 1 ° 3 3 ' 4 0 " L= 1 0 . 0 9 ∆=51°24 '12 "L=44.8626.4765.26131.0783.2764.0675.97113.0492.88146.7731.1623.72 101.06 56.4477.2965.2565.2581.26 S00°08'53"E 140.00 S00°08'53"E 140.00 S00°08'53"E 140.00S48°21'19"E 135.65N89°22'03"E 134.77N47°05'26"E 150.24N04°48'48"E 149.70 N00°43'43"E 174.58 N00°43'43"E 180.29 N00°43'43"E 180.29 S04°46'06"E 140.65131.05140.00S89°16'17"E 331.0530.0030.0054.94 S00°24'35"E 19.05 65.50 65.50 33.60 65.5065.50 156.21 69.97N89°16'17"W 140.00N89°16'17"W 140.00N58°26 '32 "E18.09CL=78.91CB=S69°49'10"W∆=22°45'15"R=200.00L=79.43S89°56'25"W 108.49N00°03'35"W 110.00 N00°43'43"E 107.51S89°56'25"W34.99∆=62°57 '52 "R=50.00 L=54 .95∆=242°57'52"R=60.00L=254.4330 30 30 30 3030OUTLOT C21010 1010101010101010101010107.57.5131010101010102525Drainage & UtilityEasementDrainage & UtilityEasementDrainage & UtilityEasementDrainage & UtilityEasementDrainage & UtilityEasementDrainage & UtilityEasementS89°16'17"E10.00S00°43'43"W10.39∆=5 7 ° 4 2 ' 4 9 " R= 8 8 . 0 0 L= 8 8 . 6 42044.7527.3723.4116.50101026.06134.9624.67S26 ° 1 6 ' 4 4 " W 8 3 . 1 8 S14°03 ' 2 7 " W 1 1 7 . 8 1 S26 ° 1 6 ' 4 4 " W 25. 6 0Drainage & Utility Easementover all of Outlot CDrainage & Utility Easementover all of Outlot D04080120Sheet 5 of 5 SheetsPRAIRIE DUNESSET 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON PIPEWITH CAP INSCRIBED #53596FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED ON PLATSCALE IN FEETSCALE: 1 INCH = 40 FEETTHE ORIENTATION OF THIS BEARING SYSTEM IS BASED ONTHE NORTH LINE OF OUTLOT A, PRESERVE AT PRAIRIEDUNES, WHICH IS ASSUMED TO BEAR N 89°51'07" EINSET C(FROM SHEET 2 OF 5 SHEETS) DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE PLAT OF PRAIRIE DUNES BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE AND PULTE HOMES OF MINNESOTA LLC 2 THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into on the day of , 2025, by and between the City of Cottage Grove, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“CITY”), and Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“DEVELOPER”). RECITALS: WHEREAS, in pursuant of the DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, the DEVELOPER has applied to the CITY for approval of the DEVELOPMENT PLANS and FINAL PLAT for Prairie Dunes; and WHEREAS, in conjunction with the granting of these approvals, the CITY requires the installation and/or availability of public utilities (sewer and water), public streets, storm sewer pipes, ponds, and other facilities; and WHEREAS, under authority granted to it, including Minnesota Statutes Chapters 412, 429, and 462, the COUNCIL approved the FINAL PLAT and DEVELOPMENT PLANS on the following conditions: 1. That the DEVELOPER enters into this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, which contract defines the work which the DEVELOPER undertakes to complete; and 2. The DEVELOPER shall provide an irrevocable letter of credit and cash deposits in the amounts and with conditions satisfactory to the CITY, providing for assurance of payment for the actual construction and installation of the improvements in the DEVELOPMENT PLANS, as specified and required by the CITY. WHEREAS, the DEVELOPMENT PLANS were prepared by a registered professional engineer and have been submitted to and approved by the CITY ENGINEER. NOW, THEREFORE, subject to the terms and conditions of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT and in reliance upon the representations, warranties and covenants of the parties herein contained, the CITY and DEVELOPER agree as follows: ARTICLE 1 DEFINITIONS 1.1. TERMS. The following terms, unless elsewhere defined specifically in the DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, shall have the following meanings as set forth below. 1.2. BUILDER. “BUILDER” means an entity that will be constructing a residence on a lot in the FINAL PLAT. 1.3. CITY. “CITY” means the City of Cottage Grove, a Minnesota municipal corporation. 1.4. CITY ENGINEER. “CITY ENGINEER” means the City Engineer of the City of Cottage Grove or delegates. 3 1.5. CITY WARRANTIES. “CITY WARRANTIES” means all CITY WARRANTIES identified in Article 12 of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. 1.6. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR. “COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR” means the Community Development Director of the City of Cottage Grove or delegates. 1.7. COUNCIL. “COUNCIL” means the Council of the City of Cottage Grove. 1.8. COUNTY. “COUNTY” means Washington County, Minnesota. 1.9. DEVELOPER. “DEVELOPER” means Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company. 1.10. DEVELOPER DEFAULT. “DEVELOPER DEFAULT” means and includes, jointly and severally, any of the following or any combination thereof: a) failure by the DEVELOPER to timely pay the CITY any money required to be paid under the DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT; b) failure by the DEVELOPER to timely construct the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS according to the DEVELOPMENT PLANS and the CITY standards and specifications; c) failure by the DEVELOPER to observe or perform any covenant, condition, obligation or agreement on its part to be observed or performed under this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT; d) breach of the DEVELOPER WARRANTIES. 1.11. DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS. “DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS” means and includes, individually and collectively, all the improvements identified in Article 4. 1.12. DEVELOPER WARRANTIES. “DEVELOPER WARRANTIES” means all DEVELOPER WARRANTIES identified in Article 10 of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. 1.13. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. “DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT” means this instant agreement by and among the CITY and DEVELOPER. 1.14. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. “DEVELOPMENT PLANS” means all the street infrastructure, utility and grading plans, drawings, specifications, and surveys dated December 13, 2024, and prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., including all revisions approved by the CITY ENGINEER, hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. 4 1.15. DEVELOPMENT PROJECT. “DEVELOPMENT PROJECT” means a residential development to be known as Prairie Dunes that will be constructed on the DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY that is substantially in conformance with the FINAL PLAT. 1.16. DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY. “DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY” means that real property legally described on Exhibit A, attached hereto, upon which the DEVELOPMENT PROJECT will be constructed. 1.17. FINAL ACCEPTANCE. “FINAL ACCEPTANCE” means all conditions of a DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENT have been completed and approved by the CITY ENGINEER or COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR. 1.18. FINAL PLAT. “FINAL PLAT” means the FINAL PLAT, approved by the COUNCIL on February 5, 2025, attached hereto as Exhibit B. 1.19. FORCE MAJEURE. “FORCE MAJEURE” means acts of God, including, but not limited to floods, ice storms, blizzards, tornadoes, landslides, lightning and earthquakes (but not including reasonably anticipated weather conditions for the geographic area), riots, global pandemics, insurrections, war or civil disorder affecting the performance of work, blockades, power or other utility failures, and fires or explosions. 1.20. FORMAL NOTICE. “FORMAL NOTICE” means notices given by one party to the other if in writing and if and when delivered or tendered either in person or by depositing it in the United States mail in a sealed envelope, by certified mail, return receipt requested, with postage and postal charges prepaid, addressed as follows: If to CITY: City of Cottage Grove Attention: City Administrator 12800 Ravine Parkway South Cottage Grove, MN 55016 If to DEVELOPER: Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC Attn: Chad Onsgard 7500 Flying Cloud Drive, Suite 670 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 or to such other address as the party addressed shall have previously designated by notice given in accordance with this Section. Notices shall be deemed to have been duly given on the date of service if served personally on the party to whom notice is to be given, or on the third day after mailing if mailed as provided above, provided, that a notice not given as above shall, if it is in writing, be deemed given if and when actually received by a party. 1.21. INDIRECT COSTS. “INDIRECT COSTS” means the costs related to: a) Finance, administration and legal costs; and 5 b) Engineering services performed by CITY Staff; and c) Testing and Right of Way services; and d) Consulting engineering services. 1.22. OTHER REGULATORY AGENCIES. “OTHER REGULATORY AGENCIES” means and includes, individually and collectively, the following: a) Minnesota Department of Transportation b) Washington County c) Washington County Highway Department d) South Washington Watershed District e) Minnesota Department of Health f) Minnesota Pollution Control Agency g) Metropolitan Council h) Minnesota Department of Natural Resources i) Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources j) Any other regulatory or governmental agency or entity affected by or having jurisdiction over the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS. 1.23. PRELIMINARY PLAT. “PRELIMINARY PLAT” means the preliminary plat approved by the COUNCIL. 1.24. PRIOR EASEMENT HOLDERS. “PRIOR EASEMENT HOLDERS” means and includes, jointly and severally, all holders of any easements or other property interests which existed prior to the grant or dedication of any public easements transferred by the FINAL PLAT or transferred pursuant to this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. 1.25. SITE IMPROVEMENTS. “SITE IMPROVEMENTS” means and includes, individually and collectively, all the improvements identified on Exhibit C and in Article 3. 1.26. UTILITY COMPANIES. “UTILITY COMPANIES” means and includes, jointly and severally, the following: a) Utility companies, including electric, gas and cable; 6 b) Pipeline companies. ARTICLE 2 FINAL PLAT APPROVAL 2.1. FINAL PLAT APPROVAL. The COUNCIL approved the FINAL PLAT. All conditions contained in the CITY Council Resolution for the FINAL PLAT shall be considered a condition of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. 2.2. RECORDING OF FINAL PLAT. The DEVELOPER shall record the FINAL PLAT and this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT with the COUNTY Recorder. No building permits shall be issued unless the DEVELOPER shows evidence to the CITY that the FINAL PLAT and this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT have been recorded with the COUNTY Recorder and the CITY has received the financial obligations required in Article 15. ARTICLE 3 SITE IMPROVEMENTS 3.1. SITE IMPROVEMENTS. DEVELOPER shall construct and install, at its own cost, all SITE IMPROVEMENTS identified on Exhibit C in accordance with industry standards for making public improvements. 3.2. AREA CHARGES. The CITY imposes Area Charges for sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer impacts to all new developments pursuant to City Code Section 8-1-3.C.2 and the Fee Schedule. Such Area Charges are identified on Exhibit G. ARTICLE 4 DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS 4.1. DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS. The DEVELOPER shall install, at its own cost, the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS in accordance with the DEVELOPMENT PLANS and in accordance with the approvals of the CITY Council, and all ordinances and PRELIMINARY and FINAL PLAT resolutions of the CITY or any amendments thereto and any Miscellaneous Requirements on Exhibit D, attached hereto. 4.2. GROUND MATERIAL. The DEVELOPER shall ensure that adequate and suitable ground material shall exist in the areas of public street and utility improvements and shall guarantee the removal, replacement or repair of substandard or unstable material through the warranty period. The cost of said removal, replacement or repair is the responsibility of the DEVELOPER. 4.3. GRADING/DRAINAGE PLAN, EASEMENTS AND HOURS OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. a) The DEVELOPER shall construct drainage facilities adequate to serve the DEVELOPMENT PROJECT in accordance with the DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The DEVELOPER agrees to grant to the CITY all necessary outlots and easements for the 7 preservation and maintenance of the drainage system, for drainage basins and for utility service and for utility looping. The DEVELOPER shall enter into any easement agreements and stormwater management agreements with the CITY that are deemed necessary to fulfill the obligations of this Section. The grading and drainage plan shall include lot and building elevations, drainage swales to be sodded, storm sewer, catch basins, erosion control structures and ponding areas necessary to conform to the overall CITY storm sewer plan. The grading of the site shall be completed in conformance with the DEVELOPMENT PLANS, subject only to such design criteria and engineering design and construction specifications as are used in the DEVELOPMENT PLANS notwithstanding any amendment or change to CITY standards for development subsequent to approval of the FINAL PLAT. b) DEVELOPER shall dedicate drainage and utility easements as shown on the FINAL PLAT. Additional utility and drainage easements that may be required by the CITY may be granted by an acceptable document as approved by the CITY. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy to a BUILDER for any dwelling unit constructed on a lot within the subdivision, a Certificate of Compliance by a land surveyor must be submitted to the CITY by the BUILDER reflecting conformance with the approved grading plan and confirming that the lot corner monuments are installed. DEVELOPER shall provide the CITY an as-built survey of the DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY in PDF and AUTOCAD format after the final rough grading is complete for review and approval by the CITY ENGINEER prior to development utility installation. c) Building construction and general construction activities are limited to Monday through Friday between the hours 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM and on Saturday between the hours of 9:00 AM and 7:00 PM. Site grading/excavation and street and utility construction activities are limited to Monday through Friday between the hours 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM and on Saturday between the hours of 9:00 AM and 7:00 PM. Building construction and construction activities are not allowed on CITY-observed holidays, unless agreed to in advance by the CITY ENGINEER. 4.4. GRADING OF PUBLIC STREETS. The DEVELOPER must grade, in accordance with the grading plan provided to and approved by the CITY, all public streets, boulevards, driveways and other public lands, if any, and other lands shown in the approved grading plan. If the DEVELOPER does not perform the work required by this paragraph, the CITY will complete all work required of the DEVELOPER. The DEVELOPER will be financially responsible for payments for this work, which will be assessed as provided in Section 16.2. 4.5. INTERIM BITUMINOUS STREET. The DEVELOPER will construct a bituminous wedge for the roadways within the FINAL PLAT. The bituminous wedge will be removed, and final wear course installed once 90% of the residences have final Certificates of Occupancy or after two (2) years. At the end of two (2) years from the day the bituminous wedge is installed, even if 90% of the homes do not have Certificates of Occupancy, the DEVELOPER will remove the wedge and place the wear course pavement. The DEVELOPER is responsible for the replacement of any damaged sidewalk or curb. The BUILDER will be responsible to preserve and protect the public roadway and any sidewalk/trail. 8 4.6. PUBLIC STREET MAINTENANCE. DEVELOPER is responsible for all maintenance, upkeep and repair of all public streets contained within the FINAL PLAT from initiation of construction through final acceptance by the CITY. 4.7. STREET SWEEPING. The DEVELOPER is responsible for the removal of all construction debris and earth materials within the public right-of-way typically resulting from new home construction activities. The CITY will inspect the roadways to ensure the DEVELOPER is keeping all public roadway surfaces clean. If any portion of a public roadway surface is found in an unacceptable condition, the CITY will have appropriate equipment dispatched to the site and all costs associated with the clean-up effort will be billed to the DEVELOPER. 4.8. STREET SIGNS. The DEVELOPER shall be financially responsible for the installation of street identification signs and non-mechanical and non-electrical traffic control signs. Street signs will be in conformance with the names as indicated on the FINAL PLAT and pursuant to CITY standards. The actual number and location of signs to be installed shall be determined by the CITY and actual installation shall be performed by CITY authorized personnel. 4.9. SOD. The DEVELOPER agrees that the BUILDER must pay for and install cultured sod from the street curb to the rear lot line(s) of each lot in the entire FINAL PLAT. For a lot where the Certificate of Occupancy is issued between October 2 and May 31 of the following year, completion of the work described in this paragraph shall be completed by the BUILDER by June 15; for a lot where the Certificate of Occupancy is issued between June 1 and October 1, completion of the work described in this paragraph shall be completed by the BUILDER by October 15. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, it is agreed that in lieu of the BUILDER installing sod on each lot, the BUILDER may provide to a lot owner a certificate that entitles the lot owner to have sod delivered to that lot at the owner’s request for installation by the lot owner. All pond access routes shall be sodded by the DEVELOPER. 4.10. BOULEVARD AND AREA RESTORATION. All boulevards shall be permanently sodded within 30 days of final grading, with the exception of those boulevards directly adjacent to buildable lots. These boulevards may be temporarily seeded until the lot is final graded, and the as-built approved, and then sod shall be installed. The DEVELOPER shall restore all other areas disturbed by the development grading operation in accordance with the approved erosion control plan, over the entire FINAL PLAT. Upon request of the CITY ENGINEER, the DEVELOPER shall remove the silt fences once the vegetation on the surrounding area has reached 70% coverage. 4.11. LOT CORNER MONUMENTS. The DEVELOPER shall install all subdivision lot corner monumentation within one year from the date of recording the FINAL PLAT, or the monumentation shall be installed on a per lot basis at the time the building permit for the subject lot is issued, whichever occurs first. At the end of the one-year period from recording of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, the DEVELOPER shall submit to CITY ENGINEER written verification by a registered land surveyor that the required monuments have been installed throughout the FINAL PLAT. 4.12. BOULEVARD TREES. No boulevard trees are required, however, if DEVELOPER or BUILDER proposes a boulevard tree, the CITY Forester shall review and approve the location of 9 the boulevard trees to be planted. The minimum size of tree to be planted in the CITY’s Right-of- Way shall be two-and-a-half caliper (2½”), as measured by the American Association of Nurserymen. Any boulevard tree shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality, and disease free as determined by the CITY Forester for twelve (12) months after planting. 4.13. STREET MAINTENANCE, RESTORATION, ACCESS AND REPAIR DURING CONSTRUCTION. The DEVELOPER shall clear, on a daily basis, any soil, earth or debris from the streets and wetlands within or adjacent to the FINAL PLAT resulting from the grading or building on the land within the FINAL PLAT by the DEVELOPER or its agents, and shall restore to the CITY’s specifications any gravel base contaminated by mixing construction or excavation debris, or earth in it, and repair to the CITY’s specifications any damage to bituminous surfacing resulting from the use of construction equipment. Furthermore, the DEVELOPER shall maintain reasonable access to any occupied buildings within the FINAL PLAT, including necessary street maintenance such as grading, graveling, patching and snow removal prior to permanent street surfacing. The DEVELOPER agrees to perform and assume all responsibilities relating to snow removal and ice control, if the streets have not been accepted for winter maintenance by the CITY ENGINEER by October 15, or later if approved by the CITY’s Public Works Director. Completion of the work described in the paragraph shall be completed within fifteen (15) days after notice by the CITY to the DEVELOPER that repair or restoration is required. Saturday working hours for the site grading/street and utility construction should start at 9:00 a.m. 4.14. OCCUPANCY AND ACCESS. a) No building permit for any lot shall be issued until the DEVELOPER has constructed a temporary access consisting of a bituminous surface base that is acceptable in design by the CITY and the conditions on Exhibit D have been followed. Special consideration may be given for two model home building permits if approved by the CITY’s Building Official and Fire Marshal as follows: i. One model home permit may be issued prior to roadway Class V gravel base and utilities being installed; and ii. One additional model home permit may be issued after Class V gravel base and utilities and storm sewer pipes have been installed to serve the lots for the model homes, as long as “Out of Service” hydrant tags have been installed on all out of service hydrants within the development. b) A temporary certificate of occupancy for any home may be issued in accordance with the following: i. The DEVELOPER has constructed a temporary bituminous roadway that is acceptable in design and approved by the CITY; ii. Water and sanitary sewer improvements are installed, tested, televised, reviewed and available for use as described in Exhibit D, Section 2(d). Hydrant tags must also be removed; 10 iii. No temporary certificate of occupancy for any lot shall be issued from the first of June through the first of October unless the Residential Temporary Certificate of Occupancy Escrow is paid, pursuant to the City’s Fee Table; iv. Grading as builts have been approved by the CITY ENGINEER. c) No final certificate of occupancy for any lot shall be issued until the first lift of street pavement and the pavement wedge has been installed; Furthermore, the DEVELOPER is responsible for the construction and cost of constructing any necessary temporary bituminous roadway before the public roadway is constructed and shall maintain reasonable access to any occupied home or homes, including necessary street maintenance prior to permanent street improvements that are accepted by the CITY. 4.15. DRIVEWAYS. Upon building a residence on a lot, the BUILDER shall construct a concrete or bituminous surface driveway for the lot in accord with CITY approved standards. For a lot for which a certificate of occupancy is issued between August 1 and May 1 of the following year, completion of the work described in this paragraph must be completed by June 15; for a lot for which a certificate of occupancy is issued between May 1 and July 31, completion of the work described in this paragraph shall be completed by September 15. 4.16. VEGETATION. The DEVELOPER shall comply with CITY ordinances and policies related to preservation of vegetation and trees and specifically shall exercise reasonable efforts in residential areas to save mature, non-diseased trees and vegetation on the subject land which do not have to be removed for reasonable installation of buildings, streets, utilities or drainage improvements, construction activities related thereto, or site grading. Prior to any excavation, the DEVELOPER shall require a certified arborist to install tree protection on all trees that are to be saved and to mark trees such trees with a red band prior to any excavation. All diseased trees shall be removed according to CITY ordinance requirements. 4.17. LANDSCAPING. The responsibility for landscaping requirements are as follows: a) The DEVELOPER is responsible for: i. Installing all landscaping improvements within the lots shown on the DEVELOPER’s approved landscape plan. ii. Installing all landscaping improvements as depicted on the DEVELOPER’s landscape plan. Landscaping for individual lots shall be installed during the construction of each lot. b) Single-family lots shall meet the following standards: i. Property owners shall maintain their yards all the way to the curb or shoulder of the abutting roadways, sidewalks and trail for each parcel, including any landscaping in the boulevards. ii. Property owners shall maintain their yards to the edge of any abutting CITY trail. 11 4.18. EROSION CONTROL. The DEVELOPER shall provide and follow a plan for erosion control and pond maintenance in accord with the Best Management Practices (BMP) as delineated in the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s on-line Stormwater Manual and as stated in the grading permit issued by the CITY. Such plan shall be detailed on the DEVELOPMENT PLANS and shall be subject to approval of the CITY ENGINEER. The DEVELOPER shall install and maintain such erosion control structures as appear necessary under the DEVELOPMENT PLANS, or as it becomes necessary subsequent thereto. The DEVELOPER shall be responsible for all damage caused as the result of grading and excavation within the FINAL PLAT including, but not limited to, restoration of existing control structures and clean-up of public right-of-way, until all lots are final graded and improvements are completed. As a portion of the erosion control plan, the DEVELOPER shall seed or sod any disturbed areas in accordance with the DEVELOPMENT PLANS. After the site is rough graded, the DEVELOPER must provide erosion control devices that are reasonably required by the CITY. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the DEVELOPER does not provide erosion control, the CITY may, after a twenty-four (24) hour notice, take appropriate action to control erosion. The CITY may, without notice draw upon any posted financial guarantee to pay costs incurred by the CITY in controlling erosion within the FINAL PLAT, or at the CITY’s option, assess the additional costs incurred as part of the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS. 4.19. PROHIBITION ON TRANSFER OF RESPONSIBILITY. The DEVELOPER must not transfer or assign its responsibility to perform the requirements of Street Sweeping, Street Signs, Street Maintenance, Restoration, Access and Repair, Landscaping, and Erosion Control to any lot purchaser or BUILDER of a home on any lot within the FINAL PLAT. Notwithstanding the foregoing, it is agreed that DEVELOPER may transfer its responsibility for sod installation, provided DEVELOPER remains liable for the performance thereof and it is understood and agreed that upon transfer of the NPDES permit to the BUILDER or buyer of an individual lot, all responsibilities subsumed under the said NPDES permit specific to the subject lot shall, thereafter, be the BUILDER’s or buyer’s responsibility and not DEVELOPER’s responsibility. 4.20. WEED/GRASS MAINTENANCE. DEVELOPER must not allow or permit within the FINAL PLAT, excluding land deeded to the CITY for public purposes, any weeds, grass, brush, or other rank vegetation to a height greater than eight (8) inches, or permit any accumulation of dead weeds, grass or brush. In the event the DEVELOPER fails to comply with this provision, the CITY may give the DEVELOPER notice to cut or remove material in violation of this paragraph. All costs of cutting or removing incurred by the CITY must be paid by the DEVELOPER or assessed against the property that is in violation. The DEVELOPER shall maintain all CITY Outlots until acceptance in writing by CITY Staff. ARTICLE 5 PARK CONTRIBUTION REQUIREMENTS 5.1. PARK DEDICATION. Park Dedication Fees must be paid as identified on Exhibit G. 12 ARTICLE 6 PERMITS, LICENSES AND OTHER APPROVALS 6.1. PERMITS. The DEVELOPER shall obtain all necessary approvals, permits and licenses from the CITY, the OTHER REGULATORY AGENCIES and the UTILITY COMPANIES, as identified on Exhibit E, attached hereto. Major design requirements of any such entities shall be determined prior to completion and incorporated into the DEVELOPMENT PLANS. All costs incurred to obtain said approvals, permits and licenses, and also all fines or penalties levied by any agency due to the failure of the DEVELOPER to obtain or comply with conditions of such approvals, permits and licenses, shall be paid by the DEVELOPER. The DEVELOPER shall defend and hold the CITY harmless from any action initiated by the OTHER REGULATORY AGENCIES and the UTILITY COMPANIES resulting from such failures of the DEVELOPER. ARTICLE 7 OTHER DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS 7.1. MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS. Any additional requirements to approval of the FINAL PLAT and DEVELOPMENT PLANS as specified by the COUNCIL are incorporated herein and identified on Exhibit D. ARTICLE 8 WARRANTY PERIOD 8.1. WARRANTY PERIOD. Upon FINAL ACCEPTANCE, CITY ENGINEER or COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR, as deemed appropriate depending on the type of DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS, will provide written notice to DEVELOPER that the warranty period has begun. 8.2. WARRANTY ON PROPER WORK AND MATERIALS. The DEVELOPER warrants all work required to be performed by it under this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT against defective material and faulty workmanship after FINAL ACCEPTANCE for the period of time as stated below: a) Landscaping, which includes all trees, grass, and sod shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality and disease free shall for a period of one (1) year after planting. Any replacements shall be similarly warranted for one year after planting. b) Streets, sidewalks, trails, lighting and utilities shall for a period of two (2) years. The warranty shall include the obligation of the DEVELOPER to repair and correct any damage to or deficiency in such improvements during the warranty period. 13 ARTICLE 9 RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS 9.1. DEVELOPER AND SITE IMPROVEMENT COSTS. The DEVELOPER shall pay for the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS and SITE IMPROVEMENTS; that is, all costs of persons doing work or furnishing skills, tools, machinery or materials, or insurance premiums or equipment or supplies and all just claims for the same; and the CITY shall be under no obligation to pay the contractor or any subcontractor any sum whatsoever on account thereof, whether or not the CITY shall have approved the contract or subcontract. Such site improvements are identified on Exhibit C. The DEVELOPER is responsible for contracting and paying for the street and utility testing costs. The CITY’s designated inspector on the DEVELOPMENT PROJECT will coordinate the street and utility testing activities. All testing reports shall be sent to the CITY with a copy to the DEVELOPER. If deductions are owed on the street and utility construction pursuant to the MNDOT standards for construction, then these deductions will be paid by DEVELOPER to CITY within thirty (30) days after DEVELOPER receives notices of such deductions. 9.2. MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES. The DEVELOPER shall reimburse the CITY for all miscellaneous costs and charges incurred or to be incurred by the CITY in connection with this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. Such costs are identified on Exhibit G. 9.3. ENFORCEMENT COSTS. The DEVELOPER shall pay the CITY for costs incurred in the enforcement of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, including engineering costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees. 9.4. TIME OF PAYMENT. DEVELOPER shall pay all bills from the CITY within thirty (30) days after billing. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall bear interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per year. ARTICLE 10 DEVELOPER WARRANTIES 10.1. STATEMENT OF DEVELOPER WARRANTIES. The DEVELOPER hereby warrants and represents the following: a) AUTHORITY. DEVELOPER is the fee title owner of the DEVELOPER parcels identified in the DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY on Exhibit A and in the FINAL PLAT and has the right, power, legal capacity and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, and no approvals or consents of any persons are necessary in connection with the authority of DEVELOPER to enter into and perform its obligations under this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. 14 b) NO DEFAULT. DEVELOPER is not in default under any lease, contract or agreement to which it is a party or by which it is bound which would affect performance under this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. DEVELOPER is not a party to or bound by any mortgage, lien, lease, agreement, instrument, order, judgment or decree which would prohibit the execution or performance of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT by DEVELOPER or prohibit any of the transactions provided for in this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. c) PRESENT COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. DEVELOPER has complied with and is not in violation of applicable federal, state or local statutes, laws, and regulations including, without limitation, permits and licenses and any applicable zoning, environmental or other law, ordinance or regulation affecting the FINAL PLAT and the DEVELOPMENT PLANS and the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS; and DEVELOPER is not aware of any pending or threatened claim of any such violation. d) CONTINUING COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. DEVELOPER will comply with all applicable federal, state and local statutes, laws and regulations including, without limitation, permits and licenses and any applicable zoning, environmental or other law, ordinance or regulation affecting the FINAL PLAT and the DEVELOPMENT PLANS and the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS. e) NO LITIGATION. There is no suit, action, arbitration or legal, administrative or other proceeding or governmental investigation pending, or threatened against or affecting DEVELOPER or the FINAL PLAT or the DEVELOPMENT PLANS or the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS. DEVELOPER is not in default with respect to any order, writ, injunction or decree of any federal, state, local or foreign court, department, agency or instrumentality. f) FULL DISCLOSURE. None of the representatives and warranties made by DEVELOPER or made in any exhibit hereto or memorandum or writing furnished or to be furnished by DEVELOPER or on its behalf intentionally contains or will contain any untrue statement of material fact or intentionally omit any material fact the omission of which would be misleading. Any unintentional untrue statements or omissions shall be corrected or cured within thirty (30) days after the DEVELOPER receives FORMAL NOTICE or obtains knowledge of such error, unless an extension is granted by the CITY. g) PLAT COMPLIANCE. The FINAL PLAT and the DEVELOPMENT PLANS comply with all CITY, COUNTY, metropolitan, state and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to, subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances and environmental regulations. h) OBTAINING PERMITS. The DEVELOPER shall obtain in a timely manner and pay for all required permits, licenses and approvals, and shall meet, in a timely manner, all requirements of all applicable, local, state and federal laws and regulations which must be obtained or met before the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS may be 15 lawfully constructed. A list of the CITY permits, licenses, and approvals required is identified on Exhibit E. i) HOMEOWNERS’ ASSOCIATION. DEVELOPER shall create a Homeowners’ Association within 180 days of the Effective Date of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT that governs the rights and responsibilities of the property owners as it relates to Outlot B, if required, as outlined in Exhibit D (1)(g). ARTICLE 11 [INTENTIONALLY BLANK] ARTICLE 12 CITY WARRANTIES 12.1. STATEMENT OF CITY WARRANTIES. The CITY hereby warrants and represents as follows: a) ORGANIZATION. CITY is a municipal corporation duly incorporated and validly existing in good standing the laws of the State of Minnesota. b) AUTHORITY. CITY is the fee title owner of the CITY parcel identified in the DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY on Exhibit A and in the FINAL PLAT and has the right, power, legal capacity and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. ARTICLE 13 INDEMNIFICATION OF CITY 13.1. INDEMNIFICATION OF CITY. Provided the CITY is not in DEFAULT under the DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT with respect to the particular matter causing the claim, loss or damage, DEVELOPER shall indemnify, defend and hold the CITY, its COUNCIL, agents, employees, attorneys and representatives harmless against and in respect of any and all claims, demands, actions, suits, proceedings, losses, costs, expenses, obligations, liabilities, damages, recoveries, and deficiencies, including interest, penalties and attorneys’ fees, that the CITY incurs of suffers, which arise out of, result from or relate to: a) breach by the DEVELOPER of the DEVELOPER WARRANTIES; b) failure of the DEVELOPER to timely construct the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS according to the DEVELOPMENT PLANS and the CITY ordinances, standards and specifications; 16 c) failure by the DEVELOPER to observe or perform any covenant, condition, obligation or agreement on its part to be observed or performed under this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT; d) failure by the DEVELOPER to pay contractors, subcontractors, laborers, or materialmen; e) failure by the DEVELOPER to pay for materials; f) approval by the CITY of the FINAL PLAT; g) approval by the CITY of the DEVELOPMENT PLANS; h) failure to obtain the necessary permits and authorizations to construct the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS; i) construction of the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS; j) delays in construction of the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS; k) payment by DEVELOPER for any required costs or assessments; l) all costs and liabilities arising because building permits were issued prior to the completion and acceptance of the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS. 13.2. NOTICE. Within a reasonable period of time after the CITY’s receipt of actual notice of any matter giving rise to a right of payment against the CITY pursuant to Section 13.1, the CITY shall give the FORMAL NOTICE in reasonable detail to the DEVELOPER. The DEVELOPER shall not be obligated to make any payment to the CITY for any such claim until the passage of thirty (30) days from the date of its receipt of FORMAL NOTICE from the CITY, during which time the DEVELOPER shall have the right to cure or remedy the event leading to such claim. 13.3. DEFENSE OF CLAIM. Provided the CITY is not in DEFAULT under the DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT with respect to the particular matter causing the claim or demand, with respect to claims or demands asserted against the CITY by a third party of the nature covered by Section 13.1, and provided that the CITY gives FORMAL NOTICE thereof, the DEVELOPER will, at its sole expense, provide for the defense thereof with counsel of its own selection but approved by the CITY; the DEVELOPER will pay all costs and expenses including attorneys’ fees incurred in so defending against such claims, provided that the CITY shall at all times also have the right to fully participate in the defense at the CITY’s expense. If the DEVELOPER fails to defend, the CITY shall have the right, but not the obligation, to undertake the defense of, and to compromise or settle the claim or other matter, for the account of and at the risk of the DEVELOPER. 17 ARTICLE 14 CITY REMEDIES UPON DEVELOPER DEFAULT 14.1. CITY REMEDIES. If a DEVELOPER DEFAULT occurs, that is not caused by FORCE MAJEURE, the CITY shall give the DEVELOPER FORMAL NOTICE of the DEVELOPER DEFAULT and the DEVELOPER shall have thirty (30) days to cure the DEVELOPER DEFAULT. If the DEVELOPER, after FORMAL NOTICE to it by the CITY, does not cure the DEVELOPER DEFAULT, then the CITY may avail itself of any remedy afforded by law and any of the following remedies: a) the CITY may specifically enforce this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT; b) the CITY may suspend any work, improvement or obligation to be performed by the CITY; c) the CITY may collect on the irrevocable letter of credit (“LOC”) or cash deposit pursuant to Article 15 hereof; d) the CITY may suspend or deny building and occupancy permits for buildings within the FINAL PLAT; e) the CITY may, at its sole option, perform the work or improvements to be performed by the DEVELOPER, in which case the DEVELOPER shall within thirty (30) days after written billing by the CITY reimburse the CITY for any costs and expenses incurred by the CITY. In the alternative, the CITY may in whole or in part, specially assess any of the costs and expenses incurred by the CITY; and the DEVELOPER hereby waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the installation and construction of the work and improvements and the special assessment resulting therefrom, including, but not limited to, notice and hearing requirement and any claim that the special assessments exceed benefit to the FINAL PLAT. The DEVELOPER hereby waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 14.2. NO ADDITIONAL WAIVER IMPLIED BY ONE WAIVER. In the event any agreement contained in this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT is breached by the DEVELOPER and thereafter waived in writing by the CITY, such waiver shall be limited to the particular breach so waived and shall not be deemed to waive any other concurrent, previous or subsequent breach hereunder. All waivers by the CITY must be in writing. 14.3. NO REMEDY EXCLUSIVE. No remedy herein conferred upon or reserved to the CITY shall be exclusive of any other available remedy or remedies, but each and every such remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy given under the DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or by statute. No delay or omission to exercise any right or power accruing upon any default shall impair any such right or power or shall be construed to be a waiver thereof, but any such right and power may be exercised from time to time 18 and as often as may be deemed expedient. In order to entitle the CITY to exercise any remedy reserved to it, it shall not be necessary to give notice, other than the FORMAL NOTICE. 14.4. EMERGENCY. Notwithstanding the requirement contained in Section 14.1 hereof relating to FORMAL NOTICE to the DEVELOPER in case of a DEVELOPER DEFAULT and notwithstanding the requirement contained in Section 14.1 hereof relating to giving the DEVELOPER a right to cure the DEVELOPER DEFAULT, in the event of an emergency as determined by the CITY ENGINEER, resulting from the DEVELOPER DEFAULT, the CITY may perform the work or improvement to be performed by the DEVELOPER without giving any notice or FORMAL NOTICE to the DEVELOPER and without giving the DEVELOPER the right to cure the DEVELOPER DEFAULT. In such case, the DEVELOPER shall within thirty (30) days after written billing by the CITY reimburse the CITY for any and all costs incurred by the CITY. In the alternative, the CITY may, in whole or in part, specially assess the costs and expenses incurred by the CITY; and the DEVELOPER hereby waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the installation and construction of the work and improvements and the special assessments resulting therefrom, including, but not limited to, notice and hearing requirements and any claim that the special assessments exceed benefit to the FINAL PLAT. The DEVELOPER hereby waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. ARTICLE 15 FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS 15.1. DEVELOPER’S LETTER OF CREDIT AMOUNT. Prior to release of the FINAL PLAT for recording, the DEVELOPER shall deposit with the CITY an irrevocable LOC for the amounts required in Exhibits C and F. In lieu of an irrevocable LOC, DEVELOPER may deposit cash or other security acceptable to CITY. All cost estimates shall be acceptable to the CITY ENGINEER. The bank and form of the irrevocable LOC shall be subject to approval by the CITY Finance Director and shall continue to be in full force and effect until released by the CITY. The irrevocable LOC shall be for a term ending two (2) years after acceptance by the CITY. In the alternative, the letter of credit may be for a one- year term provided it is automatically renewable for successive one year periods from the present or any future expiration dates, and further provided that the irrevocable LOC states that at least sixty (60) days prior to the expiration date the bank will notify the CITY if the bank elects not to renew for an additional period. The irrevocable LOC shall secure compliance by the DEVELOPER with the terms of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. The CITY may draw down on the irrevocable LOC or cash deposit, without any further notice than that provided in Section 14.1 relating to a DEVELOPER DEFAULT, for any of the following reasons: a) a DEVELOPER DEFAULT; or b) upon the CITY receiving notice that the irrevocable LOC will be allowed to lapse prior to two (2) years after acceptance by the CITY. The CITY shall use the LOC proceeds to reimburse the CITY for its costs and to cause the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS to be constructed to the extent practicable; if the CITY 19 ENGINEER determines that such DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS have been constructed and after retaining 10% of the proceeds for later distribution pursuant to Section 15.2, the remaining proceeds shall be distributed to the DEVELOPER. With CITY approval, the irrevocable LOC may be reduced pursuant to Section 15.2 from time to time as financial obligations are paid. 15.2. LOC RELEASE AND ESCROW INCREASE; DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS. The DEVELOPER may request that the LOC required by the DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT be reduced at the following milestones: a) LOC reductions. DEVELOPER may request the LOC be reduced at the following milestones and in such amounts that are commensurate with the amount of work that has been completed to date, but subject to the limitations for retainage amounts needed during the warranty period, as described below: i. Two (2) grading reductions at least two (2) months apart, except for pond cleaning. ii. Three (3) site improvement reductions at least two (2) months apart. iii. One (1) landscaping reduction. b) LOC or cash escrow release. Upon FINAL ACCEPTANCE by the CITY ENGINEER or COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR of each portion of the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS and upon commencement of the warranty periods, the LOC or cash escrows will be released as follows: i. Grading will be released in full and no retainage is required through the warranty period with the exception of pond cleaning which will be retained in its entirety though the warranty period. ii. Landscaping will be reduced by 50% and the balance will be retained through the warranty period. iii. Streets will be reduced by 75% and the balance will be retained through the warranty period. iv. DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS will be reduced by 75% and the balance will be retained through the warranty period. Following the expiration of the warranty periods, all LOC and cash escrows will be released. If it is determined by the CITY that the DEVELOPMENT PLANS were not strictly adhered to, or that work was done without CITY inspection, the CITY may require, as a condition of acceptance, that the DEVELOPER post an irrevocable LOC, or cash deposit equal to 125% of the estimated amount necessary to correct the deficiency or to protect against deficiencies arising therefrom. In the event that work, which is concealed, was done without permitting CITY inspection, then the CITY may, in the alternative, require the concealed condition to be exposed for inspection purposes. LOC reductions will be processed within 30 days of DEVELOPER request. 20 15.3. DEVELOPER’S CASH FEES AND CASH ESCROW REQUIREMENTS. At the time that the DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT is approved, DEVELOPER shall deposit cash and cash escrows with the CITY for those items and in the amounts required in the Exhibits. Release of escrow funds will be granted upon project completion and acceptance by the CITY. 15.4. BUILDER’S CASH FEES AND CASH ESCROW REQUIREMENTS. DEVELOPER shall notify each BUILDER that certain building permit fees and an escrow shall be required prior to the issuance of a building permit for each lot for those items and in the amount stated on Exhibit H, attached hereto. If the DEVELOPER is the only BUILDER pulling building permits, the CITY, in its sole discretion, may accept an irrevocable LOC from the DEVELOPER for each lot, in an amount equal to or exceeding the total amount of cash escrow requirement that would otherwise be required under this paragraph. Release of escrow funds will be granted upon project completion and acceptance by the CITY. ARTICLE 16 MISCELLANEOUS 16.1. CITY’S DUTIES. The terms of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT shall not be considered an affirmative duty upon the CITY to complete any DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS. 16.2. ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS. If the DEVELOPER fails to construct the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS, the CITY at its option, may install and construct the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS. In such case, the CITY, at its option, may specially assess the cost wholly or in part therefore under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, or may draw on the irrevocable LOC or cash deposit. If the CITY specially assesses the cost of any portion thereof, then the DEVELOPER hereby waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the installation of the improvements and the special assessments, including, but not limited to, notice and hearing requirements and any claim that the special assessments exceed the benefit to the FINAL PLAT. The DEVELOPER waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minnesota Statute § 429.081. The DEVELOPER acknowledges that the benefit from the improvements equal or exceed the amount of the special assessments. 16.3. NO THIRD PARTY RECOURSE. Third parties shall have no recourse against the CITY under this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. 16.4. VALIDITY. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph or phrase of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. 16.5. RECORDING. The DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT and PLAT shall be recorded with the COUNTY Recorder and the DEVELOPER shall provide and execute any and all documents necessary to implement the recording. 16.6. BINDING AGREEMENT. The parties mutually recognize and agree that all terms and conditions of this recordable DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT shall run with the land in the FINAL PLAT and shall be binding upon the successors and assigns of the DEVELOPER. This 21 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT shall also run with and be binding upon any after acquired interest of the DEVELOPER in the land made the subject of the FINAL PLAT. 16.7. CONTRACT ASSIGNMENT. The DEVELOPER may not assign this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT without the prior written consent of the COUNCIL, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld. In such case, the third-party buyer will be required to accept and assume all contractual and financial responsibilities provided in this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. Upon satisfaction of such requirements by such third-party buyer, the DEVELOPER’s obligations hereunder shall terminate. Absent approval of the Council, the DEVELOPER’s obligations hereunder shall continue in full force and effect, even if the DEVELOPER sells one or more lots, the entire PLAT, or any part of it. 16.8. AMENDMENT AND WAIVER. The parties hereto may by mutual written agreement amend this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT in any respect. Any party hereto may extend the time for the performance of any of the obligations of another, waive any inaccuracies in representations by another contained in this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT or in any document delivered pursuant hereto which inaccuracies would otherwise constitute a breach of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, waive compliance by another with any of the covenants contained in this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, waive performance of any obligations by the other or waive the fulfillment of any condition that is precedent to the performance by the party so waiving of any of its obligations under this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. Any agreement on the part of any party for any such amendment, extension or waiver must be in writing. No waiver of any of the provisions of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT shall be deemed, or shall constitute, a waiver of any other provisions, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver. 16.9. GOVERNING LAW. This DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the COUNTY of Washington, State of Minnesota. 16.10. COUNTERPARTS. This DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. 16.11. HEADINGS. The subject headings of the paragraphs and subparagraphs of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT are included for purposes of convenience only and shall not affect the construction of interpretation of any of its provisions. 16.12. INCONSISTENCY. If the DEVELOPMENT PLANS are inconsistent with the words of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT or if the obligation imposed hereunder upon the DEVELOPER are inconsistent, then that provision or term which imposes a greater and more demanding obligation on the DEVELOPER shall prevail. 16.13. ACCESS. The DEVELOPER hereby grants to the CITY, its agents, employees, officers, and contractors a license and right of entry to enter the DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the CITY during the installation of DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS and SITE IMPROVEMENTS. [The remainder of this page has been intentionally left blank.] 22 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. CITY: CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE By: Myron Bailey Its Mayor By: Tamara Anderson Its City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON ) On this day of , 2025, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared Myron Bailey and Tamara Anderson to me personally known, who being each by me duly sworn, each did say that they are respectively the Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Cottage Grove, the municipality named in the foregoing instrument, and that the said instrument was signed in behalf of said municipality by authority of its City Council and said Mayor and City Clerk acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said municipality. Notary Public 23 DEVELOPER: PULTE HOMES OF MINNESOTA LLC By: Name: Its: STATE OF ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) On this _____ day of ________________________, 2025, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared ________________________ to me personally known, who being by me duly sworn, did say that s/he is the ________________________ of Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, the entity named in the foregoing instrument, and that said instrument was signed on behalf of said entity by authority of its Board of Governors and said ________________________ acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of the entity. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY AND AFTER RECORDING PLEASE RETURN TO: Korine Land, #262432 LeVander, Gillen, & Miller, P.A. 1305 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 300 Eagan, MN 55121 (651) 451-1831 Chad Onsgard Vice President of Development A-1 EXHIBIT A DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY Real property situated in the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, legally described as: Lots 1-17, inclusive, Block 1, Prairie Dunes Lots 1-34, inclusive, Block 2, Prairie Dunes Lots 1-12, inclusive, Block 3, Prairie Dunes Lots 1-18, inclusive, Block 4, Prairie Dunes Lots 1-24, inclusive, Block 5, Prairie Dunes Lots 1-12, inclusive, Block 6, Prairie Dunes Lots 1-3, inclusive, Block 7, Prairie Dunes Outlots A, B, C, D, and E, Prairie Dunes B-1 EXHIBIT B FINAL PLAT B-2 EXHIBIT B FINAL PLAT CONT. B-3 B-4 B-5 C-1 EXHIBIT C SITE IMPROVEMENTS Site Improvement LOC Estimated Construction Cost Per Lot Sanitary Sewer $ 899,730.00 $ 7,497.75 Watermain $ 1,047,317.00 $ 8,727.64 Storm Sewer $ 1,355,786.00 $ 11,298.22 Streets $ 985,940.58 $ 8,216.17 Street Lighting $ 136,758.00 $ 1,139.65 Subtotal: $ 4,425,531.58 $ 36,879.43 Water Main Credit for Oversizing $ (11,530.00) $ (96.08) Subtotal: $ 4,414,001.58 $ 36,783.35 LOC (125%) $ 5,517,501.98 $ 45,979.18 Final Streets Construction Cost $ 314,183.90 $ 2,618.20 Final Streets LOC (130%): $ 408,439.07 $ 3,403.66 Total Site Improvement LOC: $ 5,925,941.05 $ 49,382.84 D-1 EXHIBIT D MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS IMPOSED BY THE CITY 1) CONDITIONS TO BE SATISFIED BEFORE CITY RELEASES THE FINAL PLAT TO BE RECORDED. a) Letter of Credit. DEVELOPER must provide the LOC required in this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. b) All Cash Deposits. DEVELOPER must pay all cash deposits required in this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. c) Planning Fees. DEVELOPER must pay the CITY all planning, engineering review and legal fees that have been incurred up to the date of approval of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. d) Stormwater Ponding. DEVELOPER must execute a Warranty Deed to the CITY for Outlot C for stormwater ponding. e) Trail Corridor. DEVELOPER must execute a Warranty Deed to the CITY for Outlot A and Outlot D for the trail corridor. f) Assessment. Payment of the deferred assessment for the South District Street and Utility Improvements in the amount of $1,343,122.18, per recorded Document Number 4432539 has been received by the CITY. g) Outlot B. DEVELOPER must provide a fully executed Warranty Deed to NP BGO Cottage Grove Logistics Park, LLC for Outlot B or must establish an HOA as provided in Section 10.1 (i) and convey Outlot B to the HOA. 2) BUILDING PERMITS. Other than the model home building permits as provided in Section 4.14, no building permits may be obtained for Phase 1A or Phase 1B as identified on Exhibit I, until: a) All the conditions in Paragraph 1 of this Exhibit D have been met; b) All stormwater ponds and associated drainage features, including storm sewer and drainage swales have been satisfactorily installed as determined by the CITY ENGINEER that support Phase 1A or Phase 1B, whichever is applicable; c) All sanitary sewer and water main, including services, have been installed, tested, televised as necessary, and reviewed and approved by the CITY ENGINEER and are available for use for Phase 1A or Phase 1B, whichever is applicable; D-2 d) DEVELOPER has constructed a temporary bituminous roadway that is acceptable in design and approved by the CITY for Phase 1A or Phase 1B, whichever is applicable; e) The documents below have been recorded: • Final Plat • Development Agreement • Warranty Deed to the City for Outlots A, C, and D • Warranty Deed for Outlot B as outlined in Exhibit D (1)(g) 3) CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY. Prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy, all the following conditions must be satisfied: a) All the conditions listed in Paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Exhibit D must be satisfied. b) As built surveys have been received by the CITY. 4) SUBDIVISION EROSION CONTROL. DEVELOPER is responsible for erosion control throughout the FINAL PLAT pursuant to the NPDES permit until all lots in the FINAL PLAT are built upon and until turf is established in each of the individual lots in the FINAL PLAT. 5) CLEAN UP OF CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS ON STREETS AND ADJOINING PROPERTY. The escrow amount stated on Exhibit G shall include an appropriate amount as determined by the Director of Public Works to ensure that the DEVELOPER removes any construction debris from streets adjoining the FINAL PLAT and from private properties that adjoint the FINAL PLAT. During the construction of the residences and other improvements within the FINAL PLAT, the DEVELOPER is responsible for removing any construction debris (including roofing materials, paper wrappings, construction material and other waste products resulting from construction) that may be blown from the construction site into adjoining private properties or into CITY streets or that may fall from delivery trucks onto adjoining private properties or CITY streets. Further, during construction, the DEVELOPER must clear the CITY streets of any dirt or other earthen material that may fall onto the CITY streets from the delivery trucks that are being used in the excavation and grading of the site. 6) MAILBOXES. The DEVELOPER is responsible for the placement of a mailbox for all the lots within the DEVELOPMENT PROJECT and must comply with the United States Postal Service’s mailbox design and placement requirements. The mailboxes must all be of similar design and color within the DEVELOPMENT PROJECT. 7) SIDEWALK SNOW REMOVAL AND TRAIL MAINTENANCE. The CITY shall provide snow removal of transportation trails and sidewalks. If the CITY does not provide snow removal on a trail or sidewalk within the DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, the property owner abutting the trail or sidewalk must remove the snow and/or ice. E-1 EXHIBIT E PERMITS, LICENSES AND OTHER APPROVALS 1. Any licenses or permits required by the Minnesota Department of Health. 2. NPDES Permit from the MPCA. 3. Right of Way Permit from the CITY. 4. Grading Permit from the CITY. 5. Any contractor licenses from the CITY or the State of Minnesota. 6. Building Permits from the CITY. 7. Electrical Permits from the CITY. 8. Utility permits that may be required from the CITY, State of Minnesota or any utility company. 9. Right of Way Permit from Washington County. F-1 EXHIBIT F SITE GRADING AND LANDSCAPING LOC Site Grading & Erosion Control Unit Qty Unit Cost Total Site Grading Restoration: Re-spread Topsoil (P) CY 43528 $ 3.00 $ 130,584.00 Site Grading Restoration: MnDot 250 Seed & Mulch AC 53.96 $ 1,500.00 $ 80,940.00 Misc. Site Grading LS 1 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 Clay Liner CY 8115 $ 40.00 $ 324,600.00 Pond Maintenance & Cleaning LS 2 $ 5,000.00 $ 10,000.00 Erosion Control - Temp. Rock Construction Entrance EA 3 $ 1,500.00 $ 4,500.00 Erosion Control - Siltfence, Machine Sliced LF 11930 $ 3.50 $ 41,755.00 EOF & Swale Seed/Blanket SY 7754 $ 5.00 $ 38,770.00 Street Sweeper With Pick-up Broom HR 40 $ 200.00 $ 8,000.00 Total - Site Grading & Erosion Control $ 649,149.00 LOC (150%) $ 973,723.50 Site Landscaping Unit Qty Unit Cost Total Site Landscaping LS 11 $ 350.00 $3,850.00 Total Site Landscaping $3,850.00 LOC (150%) $5,775.00 G-1 EXHIBIT G DEVELOPER’S CASH REQUIREMENTS AND INDIRECT COST CASH ESCROW CASH REQUIREMENTS City Fees Unit Qty Unit Cost Total Per Lot City Supplied Poles & Luminaires EA 15 $ 3,601.40 $ 54,021.00 $ 450.18 Street Light - New Developments LOT 120 $ 151.68 $ 18,201.60 $ 151.68 Park Dedication Fees (Single Family) LS 1 $ 345,332.40 $ 345,332.40 $ 2,877.77 Sealcoating - Trails SY 2,716 $ 2.50 $ 6,790.00 $ 56.58 Park and Open Space Identification Markers EA 24 $ 175.00 $ 4,200.00 $ 35.00 Business Park AUAR Charge AC 39.06 $ 111.00 $ 4,335.66 $ 36.13 2% Engineering Fee LS 1 $ 94,563.71 $ 94,563.71 $ 788.03 Total Fees $ 527,444.37 $ 4,395.37 CASH ESCROW Engineering Fees Total Per Lot Concept Review Fee $ 47,281.85 $ 394.02 Plan Review Fee $ 104,563.71 $ 871.36 City Inspection/Testing Fee $ 246,409.27 $ 2,053.41 Total Escrow $ 398,254.83 $ 3,318.79 AREA CHARGES Area Charges Cost/Acre Acres Total Per Lot Sanitary Area Charge (South District Upper) $ 3,600.00 39.06 $ 140,616.00 $ 1,171.80 Water Area Charge (Remainder of City) $ 6,010.00 39.06 $ 234,750.60 $ 1,956.26 Storm Area Charge (South District - Single Family) $ 9,160.00 39.06 $ 357,789.60 $ 2,981.58 Total Area Charges $ 733,156.20 $ 6,109.64 H-1 EXHIBIT H BUILDER’S ESCROW REQUIREMENTS AND CASH REQUIREMENTS LOC ESCROW Builder Escrow Per Lot Yard & Boulevard Sod $ 7,100.00 Lot Grading and Corner Pin Compliance Escrow $ 1,000.00 Total Per Lot: $ 8,100.00 Total LOC * $ 972,000.00 * Builder LOC covers 120 single family lots CASH REQUIREMENTS Building Permit Fees Per Lot Sod & Boulevard Tree Inspection Fee $ 165.00 Curb Stop Inspection Fee $ 170.00 Grading As-built Review Fee $ 39.00 Right-of-way Permit Fee $ 50.00 Total Cash Added to Building Permit: $ 424.00 I-1 EXHIBIT I PHASING PLAN CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2025-014 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PRAIRIE DUNES WHEREAS, Pulte Group has applied for a final plat to develop a residential subdivision named Prairie Dunes. This subdivision plat consists of a total of 120 single family homes and is located on the 60.2-acre property legally described as: Lot A Subdivision Cd 3570 Subdivision Name Preserve at Prairie Dunes , Washington County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the Developer will utilize the approved plans and specifications dated December 13, 2024, as prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. to construct the public improvements within the subdivision; and WHEREAS, the Developer will install the public improvements within the subdivision in accordance with current City ordinances and policies; and WHEREAS, a development agreement and financial sureties are required for the development of this project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council for the City of Cottage Grove, Washington County, Minnesota, hereby approves the Prairie Dunes construction plans and specifications dated December 13, 2024, as prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer and builders must comply with all City ordinances and policies. 2. The developer and builders must comply with the review comments found in the January 23, 2025, memorandum and any subsequential memorandum from Stantec. 3. Modifications to final construction plans and specifications shall be approved in writing by the City Engineer. Passed this 5th day of February 2025. Myron Bailey, Mayor Attest: Tamara Anderson, City Clerk 1 “Building Incredible Places Where People Can Live Their Dreams.” Cottage Grove - Zyweic SUBMITTAL FOR: Final Plat Cottage Grove, MN December 10, 2024 Introduction Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC (“Pulte”) is pleased to be submitting this application. Pulte will act as both the developer of the property and the builder of the homes. The primary contact for Pulte is David Von Ruden, Land Project Manager. David’s contact information has been provided to City staff. There is one owner for the properties: Joseph J. Zyweic 1299 Palisade Path Woodbury, MN 55129 The planner, surveyor, civil engineer, and landscape architect are: Westwood Attn: Ryan Bluhm 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite 300 Minnetonka, MN 55343 952-906-7432 ryan.bluhm@westwoodps.com The Property Legal Descriptions: Parcel 1: SECTION 29 TOWNSHIP 027 RANGE 021 S1/2-NW1/4 EXCEPT:THAT PT LYING WESTERLY OF A STRAIGHT LN DRAWN FROM A PT ON THE S LN OF Parcel 2: SECTION 29 TOWNSHIP 027 RANGE 021 SW1/4 EXC TO RR 3.9 AC & EXC STRIP 300FT WIDE E OF & ADJ TO RR RUN FROM S LINE TO A PT 2 Property Identification Numbers: Parcel 1: 29-027-21-23-0002 Parcel 2: 29-027-21-31-0002 Key Facts • Existing zoning AG-2 • Proposed zoning PUD, R-4 • Proposed use 76 – 45’ Single-Family Homes 86 – 65’ Single-Family Homes 162 Total Single-Family Homes • Net calculations o Net acreage 54.08 acres o Total number of homes 162 Single-Family Homes o Net Density 3 units per acre • Proposed 45’ Dimensions/Setbacks (76 Lots) o Minimum lot depth 125 feet o Front Setback 25 feet o Side Setback 5/5 feet; 10 feet total o Rear Setback 30 feet o Corner Setback 20 feet • Proposed 65’ Dimensions/Setbacks (86 Lots) o Minimum lot depth 125 feet o Front Setback 25 feet o Side Setback 7.5/5 feet; 12.5 feet total o Rear Setback 30 feet o Corner Setback 20 feet Final Plat Pulte Homes of Minnesota LLC, is bringing forth the final plat for Prairie Dunes to the City Council of Cottage Grove, MN. We ask that this application be considered for acceptance to allow for construction to begin in the spring of 2025. This will be the first addition of the overall development which consists of 120 lots. Phasing & Schedule The City of Cottage Grove application schedule along with development timeline suggests a schedule that lays out as follows: Site development spring 2025 Model home opens late 2025 Full build of homes early 2028 3 Summary The proposed community will consist of 162 single-family homes. Our application requests a Final Plat approval for the first addition of Prairie Dunes. We respectfully request the City’s support of this application. Thank you for your consideration. N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\GRADING\0052840C-CVF01.DWG PRAIRIE DUNES © 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.SHEET INDEXCONSTRUCTION PLANSPRAIRIE DUNESCOTTAGE GROVE, MNPREPARED FOR:PULTE GROUP1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431CONTACT: DEAN LOTTERPHONE: 952-219-9082EMAIL: DEAN.LOTTER@PULTEGROUP.COMSITEVicinity Map(NOT TO SCALE)SHEETSREVISIONDATENO.01..ALL..................FORFORGRADING, EROSION CONTROL, TREEPRESERVATION AND LANDSCAPEPREPARED BY:PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840CONTACT: CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPhone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  CONSTRUCTION PLANSPRAIRIE DUNESCOTTAGE GROVE, MNFORFORGRADING, EROSION CONTROL, TREEPRESERVATION AND LANDSCAPEINITIAL SUBMITTAL DATE: 12/13/24SHEET: 01 OF 14PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840Sheet List TableSHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLE01COVER02EXISTING CONDITIONS03EXISTING CONDITIONS04OVERALL GRADING DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL PLAN05GRADING DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL PLAN06GRADING DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL PLAN07GRADING DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL PLAN08GRADING DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL PLAN09GRADING DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL PLAN10STREET PROFILES11DETAILS12DETAILS13DETAILS14DETAILSBENCHMARKSHORIZONTAL DATUM1983(1986ADJ) WASHINGTON COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM IN US SURVEY FEETVERTICAL DATUM1988NAVD IN US SURVEY FEETMNDOT CONTROL POINT "HARVIN"MNDOT CONTROL POINT "SIDNEY" POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOH POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX SHHHHSSTSSTHHHHSTSSSSSTSSSTSSTCSCSSTSTSTWMHCROPCROPCROPCROPCROPCROPXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN SAN SA N SA N SANSANSAN WAT WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWAT WAT W A T WA T WATWATST O STOSTOSTOSTOST O STO STO STO STO STO STO STO STO STO STO STOSANSTO STOHHCSSTSTSHHSTHHCSCSSCSCSCSSTCSCSCSCSSCSCSCSHHSTSSTSTSEASEMENT FOR ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION LINEPURPOSES IN FAVOR OF NSP IN BK 222 OFDEEDS, PG 280, AS DOC NO. 202442EASEMENT FOR ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION LINEPURPOSES IN FAVOR OF NSP IN BK 222 OFDEEDS, PG 280, AS DOC NO. 202442INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT INSPECIAL WARRANTY DEEDS PERDOC NOS. 3020590 & 3079455O U T L O T A105TH STREET S.(PUBLIC STREET)175R/WHADLEY AVE S.(PUBLIC STREET)100R/WFD. 5/8 IN REBARFD. 1/2 IN SOLID PIPEFD. LS #43055PID 29-027-21-31-0003STATE OF MN DNRPID 29-027-21-24-0002DEBORAH ZYWIEC ESTATEPID 29-027-21-21-0004CITY OF COTTAGE GROVEPID 29-027-21-11-0004 NP BGO COTTAGE GROVE LOGISTICS PARK LLC EASEMENT FOR UTILITYPURPOSES PER DOC NO. 4377761FENCING SEPARATING FARM FIELD FROMCURRENT STREET CONSTRUCTION229.1±9.9±244.2±FENCE LINE IS ON ORSOUTHWESTERLY OF PROPERTY LINEGRAVEL DRIVE59.2±N89°51'07"E 1260.35N16°07'38"W 4084.09S00°43'43"W 3927.06 N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\GRADING\0052840C-EXF01.DWG 1402PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFKFP© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRAIRIE DUNESEXISTING CONDITIONS1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/24MATHEW J. WELINSKI5359612/13/24PULTE GROUPNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com119.999981'24' OR 12'0'120'240'360'1" = 120'..........PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONThe following information was provided in Commercial Partners Title, a division of Chicago Title Insurance Company, File NumberCP73538, which has an effective date of April 15, 2024 at 07:00 AM:Outlot A, Preserve at Prairie DunesWashington County, MinnesotaAbstract PropertyLEGENDGUY WIRESANITARY MANHOLECATCH BASINPOWER POLEELECTRIC BOXSIGNSTREET LIGHTSTEEL/WOOD POSTPOWER OVERHEADWATERMAINSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERGATE VALVEWELLCURB STOP BOXHYDRANTHAND HOLE/JUNCTION BOXSTORM MANHOLEFENCE LINECURB & GUTTERCONCRETE SURFACEBITUMINOUS SURFACEGRAVEL SURFACEFOUND MONUMENT (SEE LABEL)POHSANSTOWATSSTCSWEXHHEASEMENT LINESECTION LINELOT LINEBOUNDARY LINERIGHT-OF-WAY LINECAST IRON MONUMENT (SEE LABEL) XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXSTINGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT INSPECIAL WARRANTY DEEDS PERDOC NOS. 3020590 & 3079455110TH STREET S.(PUBLIC STREET)FD. MN DNRFD. 1/2 IN SOLIDSE COR OF THE SW 1/4 OFSEC. 29, TWP. 27, RGE. 21FD. WASHINGTON COUNTYCAST IRON MONUMENTFD. MN DNRFD. MN DNRFD. LS #43055FENCE LINE IS ON ORSOUTHWESTERLY OFPROPERTY LINEUNRECORDED TEMPORARYEASEMENT AREAUNRECORDED DRAINAGE &UTILITY EASEMENTUNRECORDED TEMPORARYCONSTRUCTION EASEMENTN16°07'38"W 4084.09S00°43'43"W 3927.0675.97N89°55'06"WO U T L O T APID 29-027-21-24-0002DEBORAH ZYWIEC ESTATEN:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\GRADING\0052840C-EXF01.DWG 1403PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFKFP© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRAIRIE DUNESEXISTING CONDITIONS1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/24MATHEW J. WELINSKI5359612/13/24PULTE GROUPNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com120.000023'24' OR 12'0'120'240'360'1" = 120'..........PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONThe following information was provided in Commercial Partners Title, a division of Chicago Title Insurance Company, File NumberCP73538, which has an effective date of April 15, 2024 at 07:00 AM:Outlot A, Preserve at Prairie DunesWashington County, MinnesotaAbstract PropertyLEGENDGUY WIRESANITARY MANHOLECATCH BASINPOWER POLEELECTRIC BOXSIGNSTREET LIGHTSTEEL/WOOD POSTPOWER OVERHEADWATERMAINSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERGATE VALVEWELLCURB STOP BOXHYDRANTHAND HOLE/JUNCTION BOXSTORM MANHOLEFENCE LINECURB & GUTTERCONCRETE SURFACEBITUMINOUS SURFACEGRAVEL SURFACEFOUND MONUMENT (SEE LABEL)POHSANSTOWATSSTCSWEXHHEASEMENT LINESECTION LINELOT LINEBOUNDARY LINERIGHT-OF-WAY LINECAST IRON MONUMENT (SEE LABEL) TETESTOSTOSTO STO STOSTOSTOSTO SAN SAN SANSANSANSANSANSANSANWATS S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S 100TH STREET SOUTH 110TH STREET SOUTHHAYWARD AVE SHEATH AVE SHADLEY AVENUE SOUTH 132 POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX S HHHH SST S ST HH HH ST S S S SST SSSTSST ST ST ST MHCROPCROPCROP X XXXXXXXXX STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO STO33.0091.00 HH ST ST SHHSTHHS ST S HH ST S ST ST S ST770780790800810 7207 3 0 7 4 0 75076077078079080081081081 0 806806 808 808808 808 808812812 8 1 0810810 810806806808808810 810810810 810810810810810 810810810810 810810810810810 808808808808808808808808808 808 806806806808806804802800798796794 810808810804 812814814 812812 81281281081 0810810 810810 808 810808810810 810 808806 808 806808 81 0 80880 8 810 80 8 80680 4 8068088088 0 88108088088088088 0 88088088108108088088088108108088108108 1 0 8 1 2 810 808810808808808810 8 1 2812812812810812 SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFINF. CELL OUTLET=798.0 BOT=796.0 HWL=800.8 EOF=804.0 ULT. EOF=808.7 BERM=802.0 POND 1 NWL=801.0 BOTTOM=791.0 HWL=802.8 EOF=805.7 BERM=806.5 POND 3 NWL=798.0 BOT=788.0 HWL=800.8 EOF=808.7 POND 2 NWL=800.0 BOTTOM=790.0 HWL=803.4 EOF=805.7 ULT. EOF=805.7 BERM=806.5 TPFTPFTPFTPFTPF TPFTPFTPFTPFTPFTPFTPFTPFTPFTPFTPFTPFTPFTPFTPFTPFTPFPOST-SF POST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFBASIN 5OUTLET=805.8HWL=806.7EOF=807.8 13.913.613.213.213.213.914.314.614.614.213.813.413.012.612.312.314.6 14.0 13.5 12.412.3 12.3 13.4 14.1 14.3 13.5 12.6 11.8 11.1 11.111.412.3 11.8 11.2 10.2 10.2 10.210.210. 2 10.2 10.6 11.112.512.212.212.213.5 12.4 12.4 11.712.012.412.112.212.512.513.013.413.814.213.412.612.612.6 13.713.413.112.812.413.012.712.712.7 13.1 13.5 13.9 14.2 14.2 13.7 13.1 13.6 13.2 12.8 12.5 12.5 12.3 12.3 12.513.213.513.8 11.912.613.914.515 . 2 15.2 15.515.215.210.3 10.2 10.2 11.0 10.5 9.7 9.6 9.7 11.71 1 . 7 12.1 12.2 12.313.4 12.7 11.5 10.9 9.2 9.0 9.0 10.9 11.5 12.2 12.5 12.3 12.0 12.011.811.713.0 13.0 11.7 10.8 9.6 9.1 10.1 10.9 11.6 11.9 12.0POST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SF SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF12.312.912.813.211.9APPROX OFFSITE EOF=8.75 EX HP~8.6 EX HP~8.6 APPROX OFFSITE EOF=9.0 9.1 ST S S S1234567891011121314151234567 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 89101112131415 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 910 1234 5 6 7 8 9 10 1234 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 34 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1 2 3 1 2 3 22 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 15 16 17 2 3 3 4 4 1 OUTLOT B OUTLOT C OUTLOT C OUTLOT B STREET 6 STREET 8STREET 7STREET 8 STREET 7STREET 7STREET 9 HADLEY AVENUE SOUTHSTREET 1STREET 6STREET 6STREET 1STREET 1STREET 3 STREET 2 STREET 2 OUTLOT A OUTLOT D OUTLOT A30 333132 21 20 11 OUTLOT A 110TH STREET SOUTH 1617 161718 2324 34 12OUTLOT D2 105TH STREET SOUTHHADLEY AVENUE SOUTHN:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\GRADING\0052840C-OAF01.DWG 1404PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFKFP© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRAIRIE DUNESOVERALL GRADINGDRAINAGE & EROSIONCONTROL PLAN1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com200.000029'40' OR 20'0'200'400'600'1" = 200'..........PROPERTY LINE982980SILT FENCESFTOP AND BOTTOM OF RETAINING WALLEMERGENCY OVERFLOWSB-19SOIL BORING LOCATIONSTOSTORM SEWERTPFTREE PROTECTION FENCETREE LINEEXISTINGPROPOSEDINDEX CONTOURINTERVAL CONTOUR982980SPOT ELEVATIONFLOW DIRECTIONSB-19RETAINING WALL (MODULAR BLOCK)GRADING LIMITSGLGRADING & EROSION CONTROL LEGEND0.00%900.00900.00TW=XXX.XXBW=XXX.XXE.O.F.VARIESLAST REVISED:08/15/17TYPICAL LOTGD25AINDICATES A CUSTOM HOUSE PAD WHICH HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETELY GRADED OR PREPAREDTO PROPOSED GRADE. ELEVATIONS AND HOUSE STYLES SHOWN ARE ENGINEERS SUGGESTEDDESIGN FOR CUSTOM LOTS AND SHOULD BE VERIFIED WITH THE DEVELOPER.G980.6989.6 99980.0983.0WO989.2 991.0983.0DRIVEWAY LOT CORNER ELEVATIONCUSTOMSOG = SLAB ON GRADE UNIT.WO = FULL BASEMENT WALKOUT, GRADED FOR 8.0' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE REAR GROUND GRADE AT THE WALKOUT TO FRONT GROUND AT GARAGE DOOR.R = RAMBLER, GRADED FOR 8.0' OF DIFFERENCE FROM BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION TO FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE DOOR.R(1) = RAMBLER, GRADED FOR 7.3' OF DIFFERENCE FROM BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION TO FRONT GROUND GRADE AT GARAGE DOOR.LO = FULL BASEMENT LOOKOUT GRADED FOR 5.0' OF DIFFERENCE FROM THE REAR GROUND GRADE AT THE LOOKOUT TO THE FRONT GROUND GRADE AT THE GARAGE DOOR.DRAINAGE ARROWLOT NUMBERMINIMUM BASEMENTFLOOR ELEVATIONREAR GROUND GRADE ATWALKOUT/LOOKOUT (0.7'BELOW BASEMENT FLOORELEVATION FOR WALKOUT)FRONT GROUND GRADEAT GARAGE DOORNOTE:1.THE NUMBER IN THE PARENTHESIS INDICATES THE NUMBER OF BLOCKS THAT THE GARAGE IS DROPPED. EACH BLOCK=8".ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEEROSION CONTROL BLANKETTURF REINFORCEMENT MATHIGH/LOW POINTHP/LP900.00CL-CL ELEVATIONCL-CL900.00PROPOSED STREET PROFILE GRADEX.XX%POND NORMAL WATER LEVELSILT FENCE-POST GRADINGPOST-SFHEAVY DUTY SILT FENCEHDSFREDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLRSCINLET PROTECTIONEROSION CONTROL CHECKS/BIOROLLSWETLAND LINEWETLAND FILLWETLAND BUFFERPOND ACCESS MAINTENANCE BENCHWETLAND BUFFER LIMITSWETLAND BUFFER MONUMENTDO NOT DISTURBDNDSEE SHEET 05SEE SHEET 09SEE SHEET 07SEE SHEET 08SEE SHEET 06EXISTINGPROPOSEDGRADING & EROSION CONTROL LEGEND SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF6.45%6.61%7.38%7.78%6.56%5.72%5.76%6.79% 6.64%6.38%4.51%6.49%5.57%8.06%7.05%4.29%5.52% 5.63% 5.70% 5.76% 5.82% 6.41% 7.24% 7.67% 6.52% 6.53% 6.83% 7.73%7.25%6.67%6.77%6.75%6.92%6.98%6.28%6.42%7.42%7.31%6.16% 5.93% 5.98% 5.94% 5.62% 5.67% 5.98% 6.92%6.65%6.53% 6.79% 6.64% 6.46%6.93%5.12%5.76%6.43%6.49% 6.55%8.72%812.3804.1R813.1804.9R813.1813.7805.5R813.7814.4806.2R814.4814.8806.6R814.8814.6806.4R814.6813.9805.7R813.9812.8804.6R812.8812.9804.7R812.9814.0805.8R814.0815.8807.6LO810.813.6 815.1807.6LO (1)810.8815.8807.6LO810.8813.3SOG813.3812.9SOG812.9812.5SOG812.5812.2SOG812.2814.3 SOG 814.3 814.7 SOG 814.7 814.9 SOG 814.9 814.7 SOG 814.7 814.0 SOG 814.0 813.2 SOG 813.2 813.2 SOG 813.2 813.5 SOG 813.5 814.0 SOG 814.0 814.1SOG814.1813.7SOG813.7813.7SOG813.7815.1SOG815.1815.1SOG815.1815.1SOG815.1814.7SOG814.7814.3SOG814.3813.9SOG813.9813.5SOG813.5812.8SOG812.8812.8SOG812.8813.0SOG813.0813.0SOG813.0813.5SOG813.5813.9SOG813.9814.3SOG814.3814.9SOG814.9814.4 SOG 814.4 813.9 SOG 813.9 813.6 SOG 813.6 813.1 SOG 813.1 813.1 SOG 813.1812.9SOG812.9813.6SOG813.6813.9SOG813.9814.2SOG814.2814.8SOG814.8812.9SOG812.9814.2SOG814.2813.0SOG813.0812.6SOG812.6812.7SOG812.7813.4SOG813.410.6 10.7 10.5 10.0 9.8 8.9 6.7 7.0 6.7 5.7 6.05.8 815.0SOG815.05.14%6.23%8.14%5.87% 814.1 SOG 814.1 813.7 SOG 813.7 813.3 SOG 813.3 813.0 SOG 813.0 813.0 SOG 813.0 812.8 SOG 812.8 813.0 SOG 813.0 813.7 SOG 813.7 814.3 SOG 814.3 814.6 SOG 814.6 6.05%6.05%6.59%7.37%6.23%6.50%6.26%6.22%6.33%5.44%2.95%11.9 12.7 13.1 13.3 13.8 13.7 12.2 12.7 12.9 12.2 12.6 13.9 12.412.311.511.89.89.4 10.4 10.8 9.8 11.313.312.7 12.1 11.8 11.4 11.1 12.613.012.211.311.311.311.411.812.212.613.512.511.911.513.113.312.5 12.512.013.313.1 8.8 7.7 9.4 11.511.6 10.211.610.810.1 11.712.112.5 12.9 13.2 12.912.011.412.311.610.1 12.8 12.410.312.512.4 LP807.7LP808.8LP807.2LP808.2E.O.F.811.0LP808.310.1 12.0 813.1SOG813.15.06%8.29.19.110.110.1814.0SOG814.0814.4 SOG 814.4 814.0 SOG 814.0 13.211.812.411.512.112.813.313.212.912.512.111.811.411.88.87.29.56.94%11.06.98%6.07%8.211.8 10.2 6.61%10.38.24% 11.4 11.1 11.3 8.7 11.410.4 9 . 8 12.012.3 13.64.96%6.52%E.O.F.811.0E.O.F.811.0E.O.F.BASIN 5OUTLET=805.8HWL=806.7EOF=807.82.00%LP807.18.58.312.38.1 9 %814.8SOG814.8814.4SOG814.4814.4SOG814.4814.7SOG814.7813.3SOG813.3813.5 SOG 813.5 813.6 SOG 813.6 814.1 SOG 814.1 812.2SOG812.26.61% 13.9 13.6 13.2 13.2 13.2 13.9 14.3 14.6 14.6 14.2 13.8 13.4 13.012.612.312.3 14.614.013.512.412.312.313.414.114.313.512.67891011121314 151616+28.22123456 0123456780+00.0012341.42%1.42%0.91%0.91%0.80%0.80%0.77%11.8LP 1+88.30ELEV 811.12HP 4+52.12ELEV 813.01LP 6+14.50ELEV 811.22HP811.6HP809.813.512.412.4 11.7 12.0 12.4 12.1 HP812.2LP 1+48.03 ELEV 810.80 12.2 12.512.513.013.4 13.8 14.2 13.412.612.612.611.613.76.52%13.4 13.1 12.8 12.4 13.012.712.712.713.113.513.914.214.213.713.113.613.212.812.512.512.312.312.513.213.513.812.8SF SF SF SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF LP807.111.011.211.210.710.19.49.49.68.88.18.910.113.6 12.3 6.06.0 11.113.612.5E.O.F.811.8E.O.F.811.5E.O.F.811.4E.O.F.811.2E.O.F.811.412.9 12.8 808.55808.33808.10809.57808.93809.22810.34810.45810.28810.83811.10810.69811.82811.68811.56811.40811.07810.70810.30809.94809.60E.O.F.809.4809.61810.34810.92810808812814816810808812810808810 810812810 812 814 810 812 812 810812 814810812814810808812814812 812812812812812 81 2 SPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOH POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXSSSTSSTMHCROPCROPCROPCROPCROPCROPCROPCROPCROPCROPCROPCROPCROPCROPCROPCROPXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATSANSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSANSANSANSANSTSHHSTHHSSTS >>>>EX MH 8STMH-120CBMH-129CBMH-113STMH-134CBMH-111CB-122CBMH-121CBMH-130CBMH-117CB-118CBMH-132CB-133CB-136CBMH-135CBMH-114CBMH-115CBMH-128CBMH-137CBMH-126CB-116CB-110CB-131CB-124CB-119CB-138808 808808806806 8 0 6 8088068048028007987967948108088108048 1 2 814 814812812 810810810810810808810 812 81 2 8108125163516451675168517051785179518051815182N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\GRADING\0052840C-GDF01.DWG 1405PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFKFP© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRAIRIE DUNESGRADING DRAINAGE &EROSION CONTROL PLAN1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com50'10' OR 5'0'50'100'150'1" = 50'..........PROPERTY LINE982980SILT FENCESFTOP AND BOTTOM OF RETAINING WALLEMERGENCY OVERFLOWSB-19SOIL BORING LOCATIONSTOSTORM SEWERTPFTREE PROTECTION FENCETREE LINEEXISTINGPROPOSEDINDEX CONTOURINTERVAL CONTOUR982980SPOT ELEVATIONFLOW DIRECTIONSB-19RETAINING WALL (MODULAR BLOCK)GRADING LIMITSGLGRADING & EROSION CONTROL LEGEND0.00%900.00900.00TW=XXX.XXBW=XXX.XXE.O.F.ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEEROSION CONTROL BLANKETTURF REINFORCEMENT MATHIGH/LOW POINTHP/LP900.00CL-CL ELEVATIONCL-CL900.00PROPOSED STREET PROFILE GRADEX.XX%POND NORMAL WATER LEVELSILT FENCE-POST GRADINGPOST-SFHEAVY DUTY SILT FENCEHDSFREDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLRSCINLET PROTECTIONEROSION CONTROL CHECKS/BIOROLLSWETLAND LINEWETLAND FILLWETLAND BUFFERPOND ACCESS MAINTENANCE BENCHWETLAND BUFFER LIMITSWETLAND BUFFER MONUMENTDO NOT DISTURBDND1.ALL CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN TO FINISHED SURFACE/GUTTERGRADES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.2.REFER TO THE SITE PLAN/RECORD PLAT FOR MOST CURRENT HORIZONTAL SITEDIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIESAND TOPOGRAPHICAL FEATURES WITH THE OWNERS AND FIELD-VERIFY PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANYDISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM PLAN.4.ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL RULES.5.POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED AT ALL TIMES.GRADING & DRAINAGE NOTES1.ALL SILT FENCE AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SHALL BE IN-PLACE PRIOR TOANY EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL VIABLE TURF ORGROUND COVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. EXISTING SILT FENCE ON-SITE SHALL BEMAINTAINED AND OR REMOVED AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THEGRADING CONTRACT. IT IS OF EXTREME IMPORTANCE TO BE AWARE OF CURRENT FIELDCONDITIONS WITH RESPECT TO EROSION CONTROL. TEMPORARY PONDING, DIKES, HAYBALES, ETC., REQUIRED BY THE CITY SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT.2.ALL STREETS DISTURBED DURING WORKING HOURS MUST BE CLEANED AT THE END OFEACH WORKING DAY. A ROCK ENTRANCE TO THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED ACCORDINGTO DETAILS TO REDUCE TRACKING OF DIRT ONTO PUBLIC STREETS.3.REDUNDANT PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS ARE NECESSARY WHEN SOIL DISTURBANCEIS WITHIN 50 FEET OF SURFACE WATERS. REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS COULDINCLUDE:3.1.TWO ROWS OF SILT FENCE (SEPARATED BY 8 FEET); OR3.2.SILT FENCE AND A TOPSOIL BERM (STABILIZE BERM WITH MULCH); OR3.3.SILT FENCE AND FIBER LOGS; OR3.4.TOPSOIL BERM AND FIBER LOGS (STABILIZE BERM WITH MULCH).4.REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO DISTURBING WITHIN 50FEET OF THE SURFACE WATER.EROSION CONTROL NOTESSILT FENCE (TYP)INLET PROTECTION (TYP) 11121314151617181920212223242526272829456781012345611514131211226OUTLOT CSTREET 6STREET 7STREET 7 HADLEY AVENUE SOU T H STREET 6OUTLOT D3033313234105TH STREET SOUTHSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SFSFSF5.19%8.15% 8.76% 8.18% 8.55% 6.22%7.01%7.82%7.99%7.75%8.51%9.35 %8.10%6.94%5.14%5.98%6.08%7.23%7.11%7.04% 6.21%6.80%7.38%7.78%7.42%7.31%6.16% 5.93% 5.98% 5.94% 812.5 804.3 R 812.5812.4804.2R812.4813.1804.9R813.1814.4807.5LO (2)810.7815.0807.5LO (1)810.7815.7807.5LO810.7 812.8 804.6 R 812.8 812.3 804.1 R 812.3 811.8 803.6 R 811.8 810.7 802.5 R 810.7 810.7802.5R810.7810.7802.5R810.7810.7802.5R810.7811.1802.9R811.1811.6803.4R811.6812.3804.1R812.3812.7SOG812.7813.3SOG813.3812.7SOG812.7813.2 805.0 R 813.2 812.5804.3R812.5811.9803.7R811.9811.6803.4R811.6812.3804.1R812.3813.1804.9R813.1813.7813.3SOG813.3812.9SOG812.9812.5SOG812.5812.2SOG812.2814.3 SOG 814.3 814.7 SOG 814.7812.9SOG813.7SOG813.7814.1 SOG 814.1 813.7 SOG 813.7 6.22%6.33%5.44%6.37% 6.13% 6.49%10.3INF. CELLOUTLET=798.0BOT=796.0HWL=800.8EOF=804.0ULT. EOF=808.7BERM=802.0POND 3NWL=798.0BOT=788.0HWL=800.8EOF=808.712.212.612.610.2 9.4 10.8 11.2 11.7 11.9 9.98.3 11.0 12.112.110.110.79.48.78.5 8. 3 8.15.89.110.7 10.6 5.04.711.610.810.1 4.05.2 5.7 8.1 10.0 11.911.6 11.2 11.2 12.64.69.710.810.6 8.9 7.1 11.55.410.0 11.7 LP807.7LP808.2LP805.48.2811.6803.4R811.6810.7 802.5 R 810.7 10.4 11.28.912.112.89.56.59%10.2 6.61%10.34.22.93.0 3.83.33.33. 1 5.4 6.29.66.811.3E.O.F.808.7E.O.F.809.4E.O.F.811.28.19% 813.6 SOG 813.6 814.1 SOG 814.1 812.2SOG812.2813.0SOG813.012.6 15 15+23.140123456780+00.00 5678 910111212+52.221.55%0.75%0.75%0.75%0.75%1.42%11.811.111.111.4 12.311.811.210.2LP 11+57.90ELEV 807.83LP 6+14.50ELEV 811.2210.21 0 . 2 10.2 10.210.210.611.1 12.5 12.2 12.2 12.2LP804.1HP811.412.4 11.7 12.0 12.4 13.713.113.613.211.9 12.6 13.9 14.515.2POST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPO S T - S F POST-SFPOST-SF POST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SFSFSF10.311.0E.O.F.811.2LP802.3E.O.F.810.6E.O.F.804.112.8 13.2 810.69810.64810.38809.68811.55811.8211.9E.O.F.804.6HP812.0E.O.F.806.5810804806808800796798802804806808790800788792794796798802790800788792794796798802810804806808 812810804806808810 806808812 8 1 0 80 6 806 808 810808812800 810798802 8 0 4 8 0 6 8 0 8 80 8 81 2 STSSPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOH POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOH POHXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXSHHHHSSTSSTHHHHSTSSSSSTSTSTSTXXXXXXXX SANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SA N SA N SA N SAN SANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN WATWATWAT WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWAT WAT WAT WAT WAT WA T WA T W A T WAT WATWATWATWATWATWATSTOST O STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOST O ST O ST O STO STO STO STO STO STO STO STO STO STO STO STO STOSTOSTO STOSTOHHSTHHSTSSTSTSSTOSTOCB-112CBMH-111STMH-107CBMH-123CB-109CBMH-108CBMH-104CB-105CBMH-128CBMH-125CBMH-126CB-127CB-110CBMH-103CB-201EX STMH-270RE=810.91D=25.0CB-124CBMH-102CB-106STMH-101CBMH-801CB-301OCS-701OCS-703FES-702FES-800FES-700FES-200STMH-300FES-100810810808808810810810810 8088 0 8 8 0 8 8 1 0 8108088 1 0 81 0 810812810808810808808 808 81081281 2 812 81 26191619261936194619561966197619861996200620162026203620462056206620762086209621062116212621362146215621662176218621962206221622262236224622562266227622862296230623162326233623462356236623762386239N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\GRADING\0052840C-GDF01.DWG 1406PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFKFP© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRAIRIE DUNESGRADING DRAINAGE &EROSION CONTROL PLAN1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com50.000015'10' OR 5'0'50'100'150'1" = 50'..........NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPROPERTY LINE982980SILT FENCESFTOP AND BOTTOM OF RETAINING WALLEMERGENCY OVERFLOWSB-19SOIL BORING LOCATIONSTOSTORM SEWERTPFTREE PROTECTION FENCETREE LINEEXISTINGPROPOSEDINDEX CONTOURINTERVAL CONTOUR982980SPOT ELEVATIONFLOW DIRECTIONSB-19RETAINING WALL (MODULAR BLOCK)GRADING LIMITSGLGRADING & EROSION CONTROL LEGEND0.00%900.00900.00TW=XXX.XXBW=XXX.XXE.O.F.ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEEROSION CONTROL BLANKETTURF REINFORCEMENT MATHIGH/LOW POINTHP/LP900.00CL-CL ELEVATIONCL-CL900.00PROPOSED STREET PROFILE GRADEX.XX%POND NORMAL WATER LEVELSILT FENCE-POST GRADINGPOST-SFHEAVY DUTY SILT FENCEHDSFREDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLRSCINLET PROTECTIONEROSION CONTROL CHECKS/BIOROLLSWETLAND LINEWETLAND FILLWETLAND BUFFERPOND ACCESS MAINTENANCE BENCHWETLAND BUFFER LIMITSWETLAND BUFFER MONUMENTDO NOT DISTURBDND1.ALL CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN TO FINISHED SURFACE/GUTTERGRADES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.2.REFER TO THE SITE PLAN/RECORD PLAT FOR MOST CURRENT HORIZONTAL SITEDIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIESAND TOPOGRAPHICAL FEATURES WITH THE OWNERS AND FIELD-VERIFY PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANYDISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM PLAN.4.ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL RULES.5.POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED AT ALL TIMES.GRADING & DRAINAGE NOTES1.ALL SILT FENCE AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SHALL BE IN-PLACE PRIOR TOANY EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL VIABLE TURF ORGROUND COVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. EXISTING SILT FENCE ON-SITE SHALL BEMAINTAINED AND OR REMOVED AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THEGRADING CONTRACT. IT IS OF EXTREME IMPORTANCE TO BE AWARE OF CURRENT FIELDCONDITIONS WITH RESPECT TO EROSION CONTROL. TEMPORARY PONDING, DIKES, HAYBALES, ETC., REQUIRED BY THE CITY SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT.2.ALL STREETS DISTURBED DURING WORKING HOURS MUST BE CLEANED AT THE END OFEACH WORKING DAY. A ROCK ENTRANCE TO THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED ACCORDINGTO DETAILS TO REDUCE TRACKING OF DIRT ONTO PUBLIC STREETS.3.REDUNDANT PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS ARE NECESSARY WHEN SOIL DISTURBANCEIS WITHIN 50 FEET OF SURFACE WATERS. REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS COULDINCLUDE:3.1.TWO ROWS OF SILT FENCE (SEPARATED BY 8 FEET); OR3.2.SILT FENCE AND A TOPSOIL BERM (STABILIZE BERM WITH MULCH); OR3.3.SILT FENCE AND FIBER LOGS; OR3.4.TOPSOIL BERM AND FIBER LOGS (STABILIZE BERM WITH MULCH).4.REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO DISTURBING WITHIN 50FEET OF THE SURFACE WATER.EROSION CONTROL NOTESSILT FENCE (TYP)INLET PROTECTION (TYP) SFSFSFSFSF SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF7.70%8.58%8.98%8.46%7.53%7.17%6.92%5.52%6.91%8.77%6.57%6.09%6.01%5.09%9.75%7.00%6.97%7.11%6.53%5.19%5.74% 8.31%8.04%8.04%9.34%8.25%8.15% 8.76% 8.18% 8.55%812.9804.7LO807.9812.0 804.5 LO (1) 807.7 812.2 804.0 R 812.2 813.6 805.4 R 813.6 813.7 805.5 R 813.7 813.5 805.3 R 813.5 814.2 806.0 LO 809.2 813.9 805.7 LO 808.9812.8804.6LO807.8812.7804.5R812.781 2 . 6 80 4 . 4 R 812.6 812.2804.0R812.2812.5804.3R812.5811.9 803.7 R 811.9 811.4 803.2 R 811.4 810.3 802.1 R 810.3 810.7 802.5 R 810.7 810.3 802.1 R 810.3 810.8 802.6 R 810.8 811.5 803.3 R 811.5 811.0 802.8 R 811.0 811.5 803.3 R 811.5 812.5 804.3 R 812.5812.4804.2R812.4813.1804.9R813.1814.4807.5LO (2)810.7815.0807.5LO (1)810.7815.7807.5LO810.7815.7807.5LO 810.7816.0807.8LO811.0816.0807.8LO811.0815.7807.5LO810.7815.7807.5LO810.7813.1804.9R813.110.69.87.36.77.510.26.77.56.36.6813.2 805.0 LO 808.2 6.35%6.66%7.86%5.17% 6. 9 9 %POND 3NWL=798.0BOT=788.0HWL=800.8EOF=808.710.6 5.013.24.78.613.413.510.8 13.4 12.911.78.1 8.1 8.8 7.3 10.6 11.4 9.8 9.99.28.08.49.010.58.510.2 8.810.811.011.11 1 . 2 11.1 10.9 11.08.87.35.6 5.6 10.910.19.68.98.49.010.310.812.212.111.09.911.34.05.2 5.7 8.1 10.0 12.311.810.75.26.58.710.5LP807.1HP811.2E.O.F.809.75.4 6.8E.O.F.808.78 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 15+23.1401234560+00.006+02.92012345 0+00.00 5+51.60 LP804.111.4 12.2 12.9 11.9 12.6 13.9 14.515.215.215.515.2 15.2 10.310.210.211.010.59.79.69.711.711.712.11 2 . 2 HP 4+77 .16ELEV 810 .87 LP 2+73.33 ELEV 809.68 HP 0+33.79 ELEV 811.13 LP 1+32.71 ELEV 809.93 12.3 13.412.7HP 9+53.92ELEV 812.00LP 12+64.12ELEV 808.0811.513.013.011.710.8POST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SF POST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SFE.O.F.806.0LP807.2E.O.F.809.211.9812.62LP804.2E.O.F.804.69.9HP810.8APPROXOFFSITEEOF=8.75EX HP~8.6EX HP~8.6HP812.0E.O.F.806.5LP804.07907887927948008028048068088 1 0 806 808810812814816800810798802804806808 810 808 810 806 80 8 812 810 808 812 810 812 808 812812STSXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXSSSTSSTHHHHSTSAN SANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN WATWATWAT W A T WAT WATWATWATWATWATSTOST O STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOST O STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO STOSTOSTO STOSTOSTOSTO STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOS TO S TO S TO SA NSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN S ANWATWA T WA TWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATS SSSSSTMH-802STMH-405CBMH-406(1)CBMH-407CBMH-404CBMH-408CBMH-402CBMH-403CBMH-409EX STMH-270RE=810.91D=25.0CBMH-412CBMH-410CB-414CBMH-413CB-411STMH-401FES-400CBMH-801CB-301CBMH-803OCS-703FES-800OCS-804STMH-30081081081281281081081080880 8 80880880 8 808 810 810 80880 8 8 0 8 8 1 0 8108088 1 0 81 0 81081281080881062256226622762286229623062316232623362346235623662376238623962406241624262436244624562466247624862496250625162526253625462556256625762586259626062616262626362646265626662676268626962706271627262736274627562766277627862796280628162826283628462856286N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\GRADING\0052840C-GDF01.DWG 1407PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFKFP© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRAIRIE DUNESGRADING DRAINAGE &EROSION CONTROL PLAN1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com###### OR ##..........NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPROPERTY LINE982980SILT FENCESFTOP AND BOTTOM OF RETAINING WALLEMERGENCY OVERFLOWSB-19SOIL BORING LOCATIONSTOSTORM SEWERTPFTREE PROTECTION FENCETREE LINEEXISTINGPROPOSEDINDEX CONTOURINTERVAL CONTOUR982980SPOT ELEVATIONFLOW DIRECTIONSB-19RETAINING WALL (MODULAR BLOCK)GRADING LIMITSGLGRADING & EROSION CONTROL LEGEND0.00%900.00900.00TW=XXX.XXBW=XXX.XXE.O.F.ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEEROSION CONTROL BLANKETTURF REINFORCEMENT MATHIGH/LOW POINTHP/LP900.00CL-CL ELEVATIONCL-CL900.00PROPOSED STREET PROFILE GRADEX.XX%POND NORMAL WATER LEVELSILT FENCE-POST GRADINGPOST-SFHEAVY DUTY SILT FENCEHDSFREDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLRSCINLET PROTECTIONEROSION CONTROL CHECKS/BIOROLLSWETLAND LINEWETLAND FILLWETLAND BUFFERPOND ACCESS MAINTENANCE BENCHWETLAND BUFFER LIMITSWETLAND BUFFER MONUMENTDO NOT DISTURBDND1.ALL CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN TO FINISHED SURFACE/GUTTERGRADES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.2.REFER TO THE SITE PLAN/RECORD PLAT FOR MOST CURRENT HORIZONTAL SITEDIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIESAND TOPOGRAPHICAL FEATURES WITH THE OWNERS AND FIELD-VERIFY PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANYDISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM PLAN.4.ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL RULES.5.POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED AT ALL TIMES.GRADING & DRAINAGE NOTES1.ALL SILT FENCE AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SHALL BE IN-PLACE PRIOR TOANY EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL VIABLE TURF ORGROUND COVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. EXISTING SILT FENCE ON-SITE SHALL BEMAINTAINED AND OR REMOVED AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THEGRADING CONTRACT. IT IS OF EXTREME IMPORTANCE TO BE AWARE OF CURRENT FIELDCONDITIONS WITH RESPECT TO EROSION CONTROL. TEMPORARY PONDING, DIKES, HAYBALES, ETC., REQUIRED BY THE CITY SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT.2.ALL STREETS DISTURBED DURING WORKING HOURS MUST BE CLEANED AT THE END OFEACH WORKING DAY. A ROCK ENTRANCE TO THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED ACCORDINGTO DETAILS TO REDUCE TRACKING OF DIRT ONTO PUBLIC STREETS.3.REDUNDANT PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS ARE NECESSARY WHEN SOIL DISTURBANCEIS WITHIN 50 FEET OF SURFACE WATERS. REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS COULDINCLUDE:3.1.TWO ROWS OF SILT FENCE (SEPARATED BY 8 FEET); OR3.2.SILT FENCE AND A TOPSOIL BERM (STABILIZE BERM WITH MULCH); OR3.3.SILT FENCE AND FIBER LOGS; OR3.4.TOPSOIL BERM AND FIBER LOGS (STABILIZE BERM WITH MULCH).4.REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO DISTURBING WITHIN 50FEET OF THE SURFACE WATER.EROSION CONTROL NOTES0'50'100'150'1" = 50'SILT FENCE (TYP)INLET PROTECTION (TYP) SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF9.04% 9.2 7 %8.73%8.19%6.53%6.95%8.89%9.16%9.76%5.62%6.91%9.60%7.53%6.46%5.80%5.42%6.30%6.59%6.81%6.90%7.68%7.08%7.17%6.92%812.3804.8LO (1)808.0812.3804.8LO (1)808.0812.5805.0LO (1)808.2812.8 804.6 LO 807.8 813.0 804.8 LO 808.0 813.0 804.8 LO 808.0 812.7 804.5 LO 807.7 812.0 804.5 LO (1) 807.7 811.4 804.5 LO (2) 807.7 809.5 801.3 R 809.5 809.7 801.5 R 809.7 811.4 804.5 LO (2) 807.7 812.0 804.5 LO (1) 807.7 812.5 804.3 R 812.5 812.9 804.7 R 812.9 812.4 804.2 R 812.4 812.1 803.9 R 812.1 811.4 803.2 R 811.4 810.6 802.4 R 810.6 809.6 801.4 R 809.6 810.1 801.9 R 810.1 811.3 803.1 R 811.3 812.2 804.0 R 812.2 813.6 805.4 R 813.6807.86.36.68.37.97.27.36.67.06.87.5813.2 805.0 LO 808.2 812.3804.8LO (1)808.07.86%7.1 7.07%POND 2NWL=800.0BOTTOM=790.0HWL=803.4EOF=805.7ULT. EOF=805.7BERM=806.57.35.6 5.6 11.09.98.77.98.29.19.910.611.411.210.310.5 1 0 . 1 9.9 10.3 4.74.74.84.84.84.94.94.95.06. 4 5.1 5.7 10.79.68.47.88.59.310.110.911.511.05.210.3E.O.F.805.70123 4 5 6 7 8 0+00.00 HP 2+97.68ELEV 811.13LP 6+39.43ELEV 807.50HP 0+31.51 ELEV 810.21 LP 1 + 1 7 . 2 4 ELEV 8 0 9 . 6 2 11.510.99.29.09.010.911.512.212.512.312.0 1 2 . 0 11.8 11.7 11.710.89.69.110.110.911.611.912.0807.09POST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SF POST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SF SFE.O.F.805.7E.O.F.806.0807.07808.94806.86806.78APPROXOFFSITEEOF=9.09.1LP804.0LP804.5804806790800792794796798802804806808806 790 800 810 792 794 796 798 802 804 806 808 812 81080680881281 0 808 812 8 0 8 810810XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXSTTETETE TE TETETETETESTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO STOSTOSTO STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO STO STO STOSTOSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANWATWATWATWATWATSSSCBMH-603CBMH-602(1)CBMH-502CBMH-501STMH-601(1)STMH-401FES-400CBMH-902FES-500STMH-901CBMH-803FES-900OCS-804OCS-903810806806808808808808808810810810 808808 808 808 808 808 806808806 808810808808810808 80880 8 62866287628862896290629162926293629462956296629762986299630063016302630363046305630663076308630963106311631263136314631563166317631863196320632163226323632463256326632763286329633063316332633363346336633763386340N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\GRADING\0052840C-GDF01.DWG 1408PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFKFP© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRAIRIE DUNESGRADING DRAINAGE &EROSION CONTROL PLAN1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com###### OR ##..........NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPROPERTY LINE982980SILT FENCESFTOP AND BOTTOM OF RETAINING WALLEMERGENCY OVERFLOWSB-19SOIL BORING LOCATIONSTOSTORM SEWERTPFTREE PROTECTION FENCETREE LINEEXISTINGPROPOSEDINDEX CONTOURINTERVAL CONTOUR982980SPOT ELEVATIONFLOW DIRECTIONSB-19RETAINING WALL (MODULAR BLOCK)GRADING LIMITSGLGRADING & EROSION CONTROL LEGEND0.00%900.00900.00TW=XXX.XXBW=XXX.XXE.O.F.ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEEROSION CONTROL BLANKETTURF REINFORCEMENT MATHIGH/LOW POINTHP/LP900.00CL-CL ELEVATIONCL-CL900.00PROPOSED STREET PROFILE GRADEX.XX%POND NORMAL WATER LEVELSILT FENCE-POST GRADINGPOST-SFHEAVY DUTY SILT FENCEHDSFREDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLRSCINLET PROTECTIONEROSION CONTROL CHECKS/BIOROLLSWETLAND LINEWETLAND FILLWETLAND BUFFERPOND ACCESS MAINTENANCE BENCHWETLAND BUFFER LIMITSWETLAND BUFFER MONUMENTDO NOT DISTURBDND1.ALL CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN TO FINISHED SURFACE/GUTTERGRADES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.2.REFER TO THE SITE PLAN/RECORD PLAT FOR MOST CURRENT HORIZONTAL SITEDIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIESAND TOPOGRAPHICAL FEATURES WITH THE OWNERS AND FIELD-VERIFY PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANYDISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM PLAN.4.ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL RULES.5.POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED AT ALL TIMES.GRADING & DRAINAGE NOTES1.ALL SILT FENCE AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SHALL BE IN-PLACE PRIOR TOANY EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL VIABLE TURF ORGROUND COVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. EXISTING SILT FENCE ON-SITE SHALL BEMAINTAINED AND OR REMOVED AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THEGRADING CONTRACT. IT IS OF EXTREME IMPORTANCE TO BE AWARE OF CURRENT FIELDCONDITIONS WITH RESPECT TO EROSION CONTROL. TEMPORARY PONDING, DIKES, HAYBALES, ETC., REQUIRED BY THE CITY SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT.2.ALL STREETS DISTURBED DURING WORKING HOURS MUST BE CLEANED AT THE END OFEACH WORKING DAY. A ROCK ENTRANCE TO THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED ACCORDINGTO DETAILS TO REDUCE TRACKING OF DIRT ONTO PUBLIC STREETS.3.REDUNDANT PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS ARE NECESSARY WHEN SOIL DISTURBANCEIS WITHIN 50 FEET OF SURFACE WATERS. REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS COULDINCLUDE:3.1.TWO ROWS OF SILT FENCE (SEPARATED BY 8 FEET); OR3.2.SILT FENCE AND A TOPSOIL BERM (STABILIZE BERM WITH MULCH); OR3.3.SILT FENCE AND FIBER LOGS; OR3.4.TOPSOIL BERM AND FIBER LOGS (STABILIZE BERM WITH MULCH).4.REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO DISTURBING WITHIN 50FEET OF THE SURFACE WATER.EROSION CONTROL NOTES0'50'100'150'1" = 50'SILT FENCE (TYP)INLET PROTECTION (TYP) 808.0808.0808.07.1POND 1NWL=801.0BOTTOM=791.0HWL=802.8EOF=805.7BERM=806.56. 4 5.1 5.7E.O.F.805.7POST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SFPOST-SF POST-SF POST-SF POST-SF POST-SF POST-SF POST-SF POST-SF POST-SF POST-SF POST-SF807.09SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SFE.O.F.805.7807.07807.02807.49806.84808.00806.91806.89807.05807.29806.72807.12806.93806.97806.97806.99807.11807.34806.86806.78LP804.5800792794796798802804806808800792794796798802804806806X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXSTOSTOSTOSTO STO STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO STO STMH-601(1)CBMH-902FES-600(1)OCS-903810810810 810806 806808 808810810 810810 810810 808 80880881080880680480 6 808808 80863326333633463366337633863396340634163426343634463456346634763486349635063516352635363546355635663576358635963606361636263636364636563666367636863696370637163726373637463756376637763786379N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\GRADING\0052840C-GDF01.DWG 1409PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFKFP© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRAIRIE DUNESGRADING DRAINAGE &EROSION CONTROL PLAN1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com###### OR ##0'50'100'150'1" = 50'..........NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPROPERTY LINE982980SILT FENCESFTOP AND BOTTOM OF RETAINING WALLEMERGENCY OVERFLOWSB-19SOIL BORING LOCATIONSTOSTORM SEWERTPFTREE PROTECTION FENCETREE LINEEXISTINGPROPOSEDINDEX CONTOURINTERVAL CONTOUR982980SPOT ELEVATIONFLOW DIRECTIONSB-19RETAINING WALL (MODULAR BLOCK)GRADING LIMITSGLGRADING & EROSION CONTROL LEGEND0.00%900.00900.00TW=XXX.XXBW=XXX.XXE.O.F.ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEEROSION CONTROL BLANKETTURF REINFORCEMENT MATHIGH/LOW POINTHP/LP900.00CL-CL ELEVATIONCL-CL900.00PROPOSED STREET PROFILE GRADEX.XX%POND NORMAL WATER LEVELSILT FENCE-POST GRADINGPOST-SFHEAVY DUTY SILT FENCEHDSFREDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLRSCINLET PROTECTIONEROSION CONTROL CHECKS/BIOROLLSWETLAND LINEWETLAND FILLWETLAND BUFFERPOND ACCESS MAINTENANCE BENCHWETLAND BUFFER LIMITSWETLAND BUFFER MONUMENTDO NOT DISTURBDND1.ALL CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN TO FINISHED SURFACE/GUTTERGRADES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.2.REFER TO THE SITE PLAN/RECORD PLAT FOR MOST CURRENT HORIZONTAL SITEDIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIESAND TOPOGRAPHICAL FEATURES WITH THE OWNERS AND FIELD-VERIFY PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANYDISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM PLAN.4.ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL RULES.5.POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED AT ALL TIMES.GRADING & DRAINAGE NOTES1.ALL SILT FENCE AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SHALL BE IN-PLACE PRIOR TOANY EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL VIABLE TURF ORGROUND COVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. EXISTING SILT FENCE ON-SITE SHALL BEMAINTAINED AND OR REMOVED AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THEGRADING CONTRACT. IT IS OF EXTREME IMPORTANCE TO BE AWARE OF CURRENT FIELDCONDITIONS WITH RESPECT TO EROSION CONTROL. TEMPORARY PONDING, DIKES, HAYBALES, ETC., REQUIRED BY THE CITY SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT.2.ALL STREETS DISTURBED DURING WORKING HOURS MUST BE CLEANED AT THE END OFEACH WORKING DAY. A ROCK ENTRANCE TO THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED ACCORDINGTO DETAILS TO REDUCE TRACKING OF DIRT ONTO PUBLIC STREETS.3.REDUNDANT PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS ARE NECESSARY WHEN SOIL DISTURBANCEIS WITHIN 50 FEET OF SURFACE WATERS. REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS COULDINCLUDE:3.1.TWO ROWS OF SILT FENCE (SEPARATED BY 8 FEET); OR3.2.SILT FENCE AND A TOPSOIL BERM (STABILIZE BERM WITH MULCH); OR3.3.SILT FENCE AND FIBER LOGS; OR3.4.TOPSOIL BERM AND FIBER LOGS (STABILIZE BERM WITH MULCH).4.REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO DISTURBING WITHIN 50FEET OF THE SURFACE WATER.EROSION CONTROL NOTESSILT FENCE (TYP) STREET 18008058108158208258308358408008058108158208258308358400+001+002+003+004+005+006+007+008+009+0010+0011+0012+0013+0014+0015+0016+0016+50-1.21%1.70%1.02%-1.50%1.26%-1.27%1.09%PVI STA = 0+00.00PVI ELEV = 810.00PVI STA = 15+00.00PVI ELEV = 810.30L.P ELEV = 807.50L.P. STA = 6+39.43PVI STA = 6+47.00PVI ELEV = 807.18A.D. = 2.92%K = 30.8590.00' VCPVC = 6+02.00 ELEV = 807.73 PVT = 6+92.00ELEV = 807.95 L.P ELEV = 808.08L.P. STA = 12+64.12PVI STA = 12+55.65PVI ELEV = 807.80A.D. = 2.52%K = 35.7490.00' VCPVC = 12+10.65ELEV = 808.48PVT = 13+00.65ELEV = 808.26 L.P ELEV = 809.62L.P. STA = 1+17.24PVI STA = 1+13.86PVI ELEV = 809.35A.D. = 2.37%K = 38.0490.00' VCPVC = 0+68.86ELEV = 809.93PVT = 1+58.86ELEV = 809.85H.P ELEV = 811.13H.P. STA = 2+97.68PVI STA = 3+00.00PVI ELEV = 811.39A.D. = -2.31%K = 39.0090.00' VCPVC = 2+55.00ELEV = 810.90PVT = 3+45.00ELEV = 810.84H.P ELEV = 812.00H.P. STA = 9+53.92PVI STA = 9+51.00PVI ELEV = 812.36A.D. = -3.20%K = 28.1390.00' VCPVC = 9+06.00ELEV = 811.59PVT = 9+96.00ELEV = 811.69 H.P ELEV = 810.21H.P. STA = 0+31.51PVI STA = 0+31.66PVI ELEV = 810.40A.D. = -2.53%K = 23.7060.00' VCPVC = 0+01.66 ELEV = 810.02 PVT = 0+61.66 ELEV = 810.02 STREET 28008058108158208258308358408008058108158208258308358400+001+002+003+004+005+006+007+00-0.68%0.75%0.85%-0.79%-1.86%1.50%PVI STA = 0+00.00PVI ELEV = 810.92PVI STA = 6+02.92 PVI ELEV = 810.16 PVI STA = 1+70.02PVI ELEV = 810.32L.P ELEV = 809.68L.P. STA = 2+73.33PVI STA = 2+72.00PVI ELEV = 809.51A.D. = 1.54%K = 58.3390.00' VCPVC = 2+27.00ELEV = 809.87PVT = 3+17.00ELEV = 809.85L.P ELEV = 809.93L.P. STA = 1+32.71PVI STA = 1+30.00PVI ELEV = 809.72A.D. = 3.36%K = 15.0050.42' VCPVC = 1+04.79ELEV = 810.19PVT = 1+55.21ELEV = 810.10H.P ELEV = 810.87H.P. STA = 4+77.16PVI STA = 4+75.00PVI ELEV = 811.03A.D. = -1.43%K = 62.9990.00' VCPVC = 4+30.00 ELEV = 810.69 PVT = 5+20.00 ELEV = 810.72 H.P ELEV = 811.13H.P. STA = 0+33.79PVI STA = 0+45.06PVI ELEV = 811.30A.D. = -2.71%K = 22.1760.00' VCPVC = 0+15.06 ELEV = 811.05 PVT = 0+75.06 ELEV = 810.74STREET 68008058108158208258308358408008058108158208258308358400+001+002+003+004+005+006+007+008+009+0010+0011+0012+0013+0014+0015+0016+0017+001.42%-0.77%-0.91%0.80%-0.75%0.75%-0.89%-1.55%PVI STA = 0+00.00 PVI ELEV = 812.70PVI STA = 16+28.22PVI ELEV = 812.50L.P ELEV = 809.54L.P. STA = 6+66.17PVI STA = 6+80.00PVI ELEV = 809.32A.D. = 2.17%K = 41.5690.00' VCPVC = 6+35.00 ELEV = 809.65 PVT = 7+25.00 ELEV = 809.95 L.P ELEV = 811.20L.P. STA = 12+06.01PVI STA = 12+03.00PVI ELEV = 811.01A.D. = 1.71%K = 52.4990.00' VCPVC = 11+58.00 ELEV = 811.42 PVT = 12+48.00 ELEV = 811.37 L.P ELEV = 810.84L.P. STA = 1+69.52PVI STA = 1+54.00PVI ELEV = 810.61A.D. = 2.30%K = 39.0990.00' VCPVC = 1+09.00 ELEV = 811.31 PVT = 1+99.00 ELEV = 810.95 H.P ELEV = 813.00H.P. STA = 9+67.67PVI STA = 9+58.00PVI ELEV = 813.25A.D. = -2.33%K = 38.6290.00' VCPVC = 9+13.00 ELEV = 812.61 PVT = 10+03.00 ELEV = 812.84 H.P ELEV = 813.38H.P. STA = 15+06.94PVI STA = 15+06.69PVI ELEV = 813.44A.D. = -1.57%K = 18.1328.50' VCPVC = 14+92.44ELEV = 813.32PVT = 15+20.94ELEV = 813.33H.P ELEV = 811.77H.P. STA = 3+30.13PVI STA = 3+30.00PVI ELEV = 811.94A.D. = -1.50%K = 59.8390.00' VCPVC = 2+85.00 ELEV = 811.60 PVT = 3+75.00 ELEV = 811.60 STREET 38008058108158208258308358408008058108158208258308358400+001+002+003+004+005+006+00-1.25%-0.75%1.18%PVI STA = 0+00.00PVI ELEV = 809.72PVI STA = 5+51.60PVI ELEV = 811.84 L.P ELEV = 809.41L.P. STA = 0+58.14PVI STA = 0+68.23PVI ELEV = 809.21A.D. = 1.93%K = 46.5690.00' VCPVC = 0+23.23ELEV = 809.55PVT = 1+13.23ELEV = 809.74H.P ELEV = 813.15H.P. STA = 4+23.54PVI STA = 4+24.81PVI ELEV = 813.43A.D. = -2.43%K = 36.9790.00' VCPVC = 3+79.81ELEV = 812.89PVT = 4+69.81ELEV = 812.86STREET 78008058108158208258308358408008058108158208258308358400+001+002+003+004+005+006+007+008+009+0010+0011+0012+0013+001.76%0.85%-0.75%-1.45%1.65%-0.81%PVI STA = 0+00.00PVI ELEV = 812.37 PVI STA = 12+52.22PVI ELEV = 809.16PVI STA = 6+60.08PVI ELEV = 811.77L.P ELEV = 807.83L.P. STA = 11+57.90PVI STA = 11+68.00PVI ELEV = 807.68A.D. = 2.56%K = 21.2454.40' VCPVC = 11+40.80 ELEV = 807.90 PVT = 11+95.20 ELEV = 808.16 L.P ELEV = 811.12L.P. STA = 1+88.30PVI STA = 1+91.00PVI ELEV = 810.94A.D. = 1.60%K = 56.4090.00' VCPVC = 1+46.00ELEV = 811.28PVT = 2+36.00ELEV = 811.32 L.P ELEV = 811.22L.P. STA = 6+14.50PVI STA = 6+16.00PVI ELEV = 811.04A.D. = 3.10%K = 15.0046.44' VCPVC = 5+92.78ELEV = 811.38PVT = 6+39.22ELEV = 811.43 H.P ELEV = 813.01H.P. STA = 4+52.12PVI STA = 4+63.94PVI ELEV = 813.25A.D. = -2.29%K = 39.2490.00' VCPVC = 4+18.94ELEV = 812.87PVT = 5+08.94ELEV = 812.59 STREET 88008058108158208258308358408008058108158208258308358400+001+002+003+004+005+006+007+008+009+009+500.75%1.10%-0.83%-0.75%-0.75%PVI STA = 0+00.00 PVI ELEV = 813.35 PVI STA = 8+93.47 PVI ELEV = 811.92 L.P ELEV = 811.19L.P. STA = 7+74.36PVI STA = 7+72.00PVI ELEV = 811.01A.D. = 1.58%K = 56.8590.00' VCPVC = 7+27.00 ELEV = 811.38 PVT = 8+17.00 ELEV = 811.35 L.P ELEV = 811.69L.P. STA = 2+40.53PVI STA = 2+49.00PVI ELEV = 811.48A.D. = 1.85%K = 48.7090.00' VCPVC = 2+04.00 ELEV = 811.82 PVT = 2+94.00 ELEV = 811.98 H.P ELEV = 813.48H.P. STA = 4+56.17PVI STA = 4+50.00PVI ELEV = 813.69A.D. = -1.93%K = 46.6190.00' VCPVC = 4+05.00ELEV = 813.20PVT = 4+95.00ELEV = 813.32STREET 98008058108158208258308358408008058108158208258308358400+001+002+003+004+005+00-1.08%0.75%PVI STA = 0+00.00PVI ELEV = 812.11PVI STA = 4+59.45PVI ELEV = 813.00 L.P ELEV = 810.80L.P. STA = 1+48.03PVI STA = 1+40.00PVI ELEV = 810.60A.D. = 1.83%K = 49.3090.00' VCPVC = 0+95.00ELEV = 811.09PVT = 1+85.00ELEV = 810.94N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\GRADING\0052840C-DTF01.DWG 1410PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFKFP© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRAIRIE DUNESSTREET PROFILES1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com100'20' OR 10'0'100'200'300'1" = 100'..........STREET 1STREET 2STREET 3STREET 6STREET 8STREET 9STREET 7 N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\GRADING\0052840C-DTF01.DWG 1411PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFKFP© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRAIRIE DUNESDETAILS1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com###### OR ##.......... N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\GRADING\0052840C-DTF01.DWG 1412PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFKFP© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRAIRIE DUNESDETAILS1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com###### OR ##.......... N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\GRADING\0052840C-DTF01.DWG 1413PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFKFP© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRAIRIE DUNESDETAILS1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com###### OR ##.......... N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\GRADING\0052840C-DTF01.DWG 1414PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFKFP© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRAIRIE DUNESDETAILS1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com###### OR ##.......... N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-CVF01.DWG PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES © 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.BENCHMARKSHORIZONTAL DATUM1983(1986ADJ) WASHINGTON COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM IN US SURVEY FEETVERTICAL DATUM1988NAVD IN US SURVEY FEETMNDOT CONTROL POINT "HARVIN"MNDOT CONTROL POINT "SIDNEY"SHEET INDEXCONSTRUCTION PLANSPRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESCOTTAGE GROVE, MNPREPARED FOR:PULTE GROUP1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431CONTACT: DEAN LOTTERPHONE: 952-219-9082EMAIL: DEAN.LOTTER@PULTEGROUP.COMSITEVicinity Map(NOT TO SCALE)SHEETSREVISIONDATENO.....................FORFORSANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN,STORM SEWER AND STREETSPREPARED BY:PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840CONTACT: CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPhone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  CONSTRUCTION PLANSPRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESCOTTAGE GROVE, MNFORFORSANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN,STORM SEWER AND STREETSINITIAL SUBMITTAL DATE: 12/13/24SHEET: 1 OF 38PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840Sheet List TableSHEETNUMBERSHEET TITLE1Cover2Overall Utility Plan3Sanitary Sewer & Watermain Construction Plan4Sanitary Sewer & Watermain Construction Plan5Sanitary Sewer & Watermain Construction Plan6Sanitary Sewer & Watermain Construction Plan7Sanitary Sewer & Watermain Construction Plan8Sanitary Sewer & Watermain Construction Plan9Sanitary Sewer & Watermain Construction Plan10Street & Storm Sewer Construction Plan11Street & Storm Sewer Construction Plan12Street & Storm Sewer Construction Plan13Street & Storm Sewer Construction Plan14Street & Storm Sewer Construction Plan15Street & Storm Sewer Construction Plan16Backyard Storm Sewer Construction Plan17Backyard Storm Sewer Construction Plan18Backyard Storm Sewer Construction Plan19Backyard Storm Sewer Construction Plan20Trails 1 & 221Intersection Details22Intersection Details23Intersection Details24Intersection Details25Details26Details27Details28Details29Details30Details31MNDOT Pedestrian Ramp Details32MNDOT Pedestrian Ramp Details33MNDOT Pedestrian Ramp Details34MNDOT Pedestrian Ramp Details35MNDOT Pedestrian Ramp Details36MNDOT Pedestrian Ramp Details37Lighting Plan38Signage Plan POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHCSCSWMHSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN SANSANSAN SAN SANWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWAT WATWATWAT WAT STOSTOSTO STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSAN STO STO33.0091.00 CSCSCSCSCSCSCSCSCSCSCSCSCS12345678910111213141512345678910111213141516171819202122 23 24 25 26 27282912345678910111213141512345678910 12345678910 1234 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 34 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1 2 3 1 2 3 2219181716151413 1211 15 16 17 122 24355 6 6 2 3 3 4 4 1 OUTLOT B OUTLOT C OUTLOT C OUTLOT B OUTLOT A OUTLOT D OUTLOT A30 333132212011OUTLOT A 1617 161718 2324 3412OUTLOT D7 2 012345678 012 34 5 60123 451234567891011121234 012345678910111213141516 ST S S S010123456789101112131415012345MH-5MH-6MH-25MH-19MH-3MH-1MH-12MH-2MH-9MH-7MH-10MH-8MH-11MH-21MH-24MH-20MH-4MH-13MH-18MH-16MH-22MH-17MH-23MH-14MH-15CBMH-129STMH-120CBMH-113STMH-134STMH-802STMH-107CBMH-121CB-122CBMH-130CBMH-111CB-112CBMH-132CB-133CB-136CBMH-135CB-118CBMH-117CBMH-123CBMH-108CB-109CBMH-115CBMH-114STMH-300CBMH-104CB-105CBMH-128CBMH-412CBMH-125CBMH-126CB-127CB-414CBMH-413CB-116CB-131CBMH-103CB-110CBMH-137CBMH-410CBMH-102CB-138CB-119CB-411CB-124CBMH-902CB-106STMH-101CBMH-801STMH-901CB-301OCS-903CBMH-803OCS-804CB-201OCS-701FES-900OCS-703FES-702FES-200FES-100FES-800FES-700STREET 8SEE SHEET 3 & 10STREET 6SEE SHEET 5, 6,12, & 13STREET 9SEE SHEET 7 & 14 STREET 7SEE SHEET 4 & 11STREET 1SEE SHEET 9 & 15STREET 3 SEE SHEET 8 & 15INF. CELLOUTLET=798.0BOT=796.0HWL=800.8EOF=804.0ULT. EOF=808.7BERM=802.0POND 3NWL=798.0BOT=788.0HWL=800.8EOF=808.7POND 2NWL=800.0BOTTOM=790.0HWL=803.4EOF=805.7ULT. EOF=805.7BERM=806.5POND 1NWL=801.0BOTTOM=791.0HWL=802.8EOF=805.7BERM=806.5N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-OAF01.DWG 382PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESOVERALL UTILITY PLAN1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com120'24' OR 12'0'120'240'360'1" = 120'..........SANEXISTINGPROPOSEDWATWATOVERALL UTILITY LEGEND1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ANDNOTIFY THE OWNER OF ANY DIFFERENCES.2.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST. TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALLCONFORM TO THE 2023 ED. OF THE "STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAINAND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION BYTHE CITY ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION OF MINN." AND TO THE "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FORHIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION" MINN. DEPT. OF TRANS., 2020 EDITION AND SUPPLEMENTALSPECIFICATIONS SEPTEMBER 2022. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO FOLLOW ALLPROCEDURES AS OUTLINED BY THE LOCAL AGENCY.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE THE NECESSARY PERMITS FOR ALL WORK OUTSIDE OF THEPROPERTY LIMITS.4.VERIFY EXISTING INVERT LOCATION & ELEVATION PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" FOR FOR UTILITY LOCATIONSPRIOR TO UTILITY INSTALLATION.GENERAL UTILITY NOTESSDTSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERWATER MAINHYDRANTDRAIN TILEFUTURESTORM SEWER CASTING SCHEDULEStructureCasting TypeCity Detail PlateNumberTypeDia.100FES36"w/TRASHGUARDSTO-11101STMH60"R-1642BSTO-3102CBMH60"R-3067-VBSTO-5103CBMH96"R-3067-VSTO-5104CBMH72"R-3067-VSTO-5105CB2'x 3'R-3067-VSTO-5106CB48"R-4342STO-9107STMH72"R-1642BSTO-3108CBMH48"R-3067-VBSTO-5109CB2'x 3'R-3067-VBSTO-5110CB48"R-4342STO-9111CBMH48"R-3067-VBSTO-5112CB2'x 3'R-3067-VBSTO-5113CBMH48"R-3067-VSTO-5114CBMH48"R-3067-VBSTO-5115CBMH48"R-3067-VBSTO-5116CB48"R-4342STO-9117CBMH48"R-3067-VBSTO-5118CB2'x 3'R-3067-VBSTO-5119CB48"R-4342STO-9120STMH48"R-1642BSTO-3121CBMH48"R-3067-VBSTO-5122CB2'x 3'R-3067-VBSTO-5123CBMH60"R-3067-VSTO-5124CB48"R-4342STO-9125CBMH48"R-3067-VSTO-5126CBMH48"R-3067-VBSTO-5127CB2'x 3'R-3067-VBSTO-5128CBMH48"R-3067-VSTO-5129CBMH48"R-3067-VSTO-5130CBMH60"R-3067-VSTO-5131CB48"R-4342STO-9132CBMH48"R-3067-VBSTO-5133CB2'x 3'R-3067-VBSTO-5134STMH60"R-1642BSTO-3135CBMH48"R-3067-VBSTO-5136CB2'x 3'R-3067-VBSTO-5137CBMH48"R-4342STO-9138CB48"R-4342STO-9200FES12"w/TRASHGUARDSTO-11201CB48"R-4342STO-9300STMH48"R-1642BSTO-3301CB48"R-4342STO-9410CBMH60"R-4342STO-9411CB48"R-4342STO-9412CBMH48"R-3067-VSTO-5413CBMH48"R-3067-VBSTO-5414CB2'x 3'R-3067-VBSTO-5700FES24"w/TRASHGUARDSTO-11701OCS48"SEE DETAILSEE SHEET 30702FES24"w/TRASHGUARDSTO-11703OCS48"SEE DETAILSEE SHEET 30800FES24"w/TRASHGUARDSTO-11801CBMH48"R-4342STO-9802STMH48"R-1642BSTO-3803CBMH48"R-4342STO-9804OCS48"SEE DETAILSEE SHEET 30900FES21"w/TRASHGUARDSTO-11901STMH48"R-1642BSTO-3902CBMH48"R-4342STO-9903OCS48"SEE DETAILSEE SHEET 30CONNECT TO EXISTINGSTORM SEWERCONNECT TO EXISTINGSANITARY SEWERCONNECT TO EXISTINGSANITARY SEWERCONNECT TO EXISTINGSANITARY SEWERCONNECT TO EXISTINGWATERMAINCONNECT TO EXISTINGWATERMAINCONNECT TO EXISTINGWATERMAINFUTURE PHASE POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOH POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHSEX-MHRE = 813.32SEX-MHRE = 813.04WMHSANSANSANSAN WATWATWATWATWATWATSANSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO STOSTOSTOSTOSAN SAN SAN SAN SEX-MHRE = 813.41CSCS11407812.90USSSE11408812.63USSSECS11412812.33USSSE123456789101112131415561234567891013141512322145OUTLOT A16171617182324OUTLOT D0123456781 012345678SMH-5MH-4MH-3MH-2MH-18"x8" TEESTA 3+4010.0' R8"x8" TEESTA 3+4010.0' R8"x8" TEESTA 9+049.8' RSTREET 87807857907958008058108158207807857907958008058108158200+001+002+003+004+005+006+007+008+009+009+50MH-5STA: 8+93RE=811.87IE=799.87 (8" N)IE=799.77 (8" E)D=12.1MH-4STA: 7+65RE=811.14IE=799.14 (8" W)IE=799.04 (8" E)D=12.1MH-3STA: 5+46RE=812.84IE=798.17 (8" W)IE=798.07 (8" E)D=14.8MH-2STA: 3+30RE=812.32IE=797.20 (8" W)IE=797.10 (8" E)D=15.2MH-1STA: 0+69RE=812.76IE=796.06 (8" W)IE=783.68 (8" E)D=29.1EX MH-100STA: 0+01RE=813.32IE=783.40 (8" W)D=29.9128 LF-8" PVCSDR 35 @0.49%220 LF-8" PVC SDR 35 @ 0.40%216 LF-8" PVC SDR 35 @ 0.40%261 LF-8" PVC SDR 35 @ 0.40%EX 69 LF-8" PVC @ 0.41%TOP OF WMSTA=9+07ELEV=803.718"x6" TEE (HYD)STA=4+72ELEV=805.658"x8" TEESTA=3+40ELEV=804.348"x6" TEE (HYD)STA=1+02ELEV=804.79REMOVE TEMP HYDRANT & REDUCERSTA=0+59ELEV=805.11CONNECT TO EX. WMSTA=0+53ELEV=805.15852 LF - 8" DIP CL 527.5' MIN COVERRISER 4.0' RISER 3.5' RISER 3.0' RISER 2.5' RISER 2.5' RISER 2.5' RISER 2.5' RISER 3.0' RISER 3.0' RISER 2.5'RISER 2.5'TOP OF WMSTA=7+74ELEV=803.39TOP OF WMSTA=2+41ELEV=803.89BOT OF STMSTA=7+74ELEV=806.35BOT OF STMSTA=2+41ELEV=806.85N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-UTF01.DWG 383PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESSANITARY SEWER &WATERMAINCONSTRUCTION PLAN1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com50'10' OR 5'0'50'100'150'1" = 50'..........LEGENDSANITARY SEWER SERVICE WYE LOCATION ONMAIN LINE FROM DOWNSTREAM MANHOLESANITARY SEWER SERVICEINVERT ELEVATION @ EASEMENT LINEDENOTES ELEVATION OF THE TOP OF WATERSERVICE STOP BOXWATER SERVICE TO THIS LOT SHALL BEINSTALLED UNDER PROPOSED STORM SEWER& SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM VERTICALSEPARATION FROM STORM PIPE OF 2.0 FEETX.X' RISERXXX.XSANITARY SEWER SERVICE TO THIS LOT SHALLBE INSTALLED UNDER PROPOSED STORM SEWER- INSTALL RISER AT PROPERTY LINEWYE = X+XXBA1.FLAG HYDRANTS.2.EXTEND RODS ON DEEP VALVES.3.ALL DROP MANHOLES TO BE CONSTRUCTED USINGOUTSIDE DROPS.4.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST.TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OFCOTTAGE GROVE'S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREET &UTILITY CONSTRUCTION - 2024.GENERAL NOTESXXX.XSTREET 8801.5WYE = 0+12811.5801.7WYE = 1+88811.7802.0WYE = 1+42812.0802.4WYE = 0+96812.4802.8WYE = 0+50812.8803.2WYE = 0+05813.2803.8WYE = 1+073.0' RISER813.8803.7WYE = 0+613.0' RISER813.7802.9WYE = 0+152.5' RISER812.9803.6WYE = 1+732.5' RISER813.6802.4WYE = 2+302.5' RISER812.4802.1WYE = 1+832.5' RISER812.1802.0WYE = 1+572.5' RISER812.0802.3WYE = 1+113.0' RISER812.3802.7WYE = 0+653.5' RISER812.7803.0WYE = 0+184.0' RISER813.0801.6WYE = 0+39811.6801.6WYE = 0+33811.6801.5WYE = 2+10811.5801.8WYE = 1+68811.8802.2WYE = 1+22812.2802.6WYE = 0+75812.6803.3WYE = 1+992.5' RISER813.3803.0WYE = 0+29813.0REMOVE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY & CONNECTTO EXISTING 8" DIP WATER MAINHYD w/ AUX VALVE10' - 6" DIP8" X 6" TEEGRND EL. = 813.6DRAINAGE & UTILITYEASEMENT (TYP.)1" COPPER SERVICEw/ CURB STOP (TYP.)4" PVC SCH 40SAN SERVICE (TYP.)STREET 7 SEE SHEET 4 STREET 5STREET 6SEE SHEET 6HYD w/ AUX VALVE11' - 6" DIP8" X 6" TEEGRND EL. = 812.7REMOVE PLUG & CONNECT MHTO EXISTING SANITARY STUBABABSTREET 8 S EX-MH RE = 809.53 S EX-MH RE = 810.70 S EX-MH RE = 808.60 S EX-MH RE = 809.85 S EX-MH RE = 810.79 S EX-MH RE = 812.37 S EX-MHRE = 811.61SEX-MHRE = 813.32CSCSSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN SANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN SAN SAN SAN WAT WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWAT WAT WAT SAN WAT STOSTO STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSANSANCS CSCS11407812.90USSSE11408812.63USSSE S EX-MHRE = 811.64CS11412812.33USSSE11413811.73USSSECSCS11416811.50USSSECS11420811.56USSSECS11423811.45USSSE11424811.57USSSECSCS11427811.76USSSE S EX-MHRE = 811.45 CS11430 811.82 USSSE 11431 812.33 USSSE CS CS11434 812.88 USSSE S EX-MH RE = 810.94 S EX-MH RE = 808.96 12345678910 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 89101112 6 7 8 910 123456789 10 2219181716 15 14 13 12 11 2 55 30 333132 2120112324 34 0123451234 567891011121 012345123456 7891011120123451 S S SMH-10MH-9MH-8MH-13MH-14MH-158" 22.5° BENDSTA 12+439.1' L8" GVSTA 0+3010.0' R8" GVSTA 3+0210.0' REX MH-344RE=810.70IE=778.35 (8" S)D=32.48"x8" CROSSSTA 6+709.7' R8" 11.25° BENDSTA 7+9310.1' R8" GVSTA 6+2110.0' R8" GVSTA 6+909.1' R8"x8" TEESTA 3+2010.0' R8" GVSTA 3+6010.0' RSTREET 77857907958008058108158207857907958008058108158200+001+002+003+004+005+006+007+008+009+0010+0011+0012+0013+00MH-2STA: 0+00RE=812.32IE=797.20 (8" W)IE=797.10 (8" E)D=15.2MH-10STA: 0+60RE=811.87IE=799.87 (8" S)D=12.0270 LF-8" PVCSDR 35 @0.53%MH-9STA: 3+30RE=812.06IE=798.43 (8" W)IE=798.43 (8" N)IE=798.33 (8" S)D=13.7MH-8STA: 6+60RE=811.72IE=794.42 (8" W)IE=794.41 (8" S)IE=794.42 (8" N)IE=794.32 (8" E)D=17.4MH-13STA: 7+93RE=810.65IE=794.94 (8" S)IE=794.94 (8" N)D=15.7MH-14STA: 9+93RE=808.97IE=795.74 (8" S)IE=795.74 (8" N)D=13.2MH-15STA: 11+06RE=808.13IE=796.13 (8" N)D=12.096 LF-8" PVCSDR 35 @0.40%200 LF-8" PVC SDR 35 @ 0.40%133 LF-8" PVC SDR 35 @ 0.40%330 LF-8" PVC SDR 35 @ 1.19%TOP OF WMSTA=-0+10ELEV=804.348" GVSTA=0+30ELEV=804.178"x6" TEE (HYD)STA=2+90ELEV=803.988" GVSTA=3+02ELEV=803.888"x8" TEESTA=3+20ELEV=803.718" GVSTA=3+60ELEV=803.518"x6" TEE (HYD)STA=6+26ELEV=803.478" GVSTA=6+21ELEV=803.428"x8" CROSSSTA=6+70ELEV=802.368" GVSTA=6+90ELEV=802.358"x6" TEE (HYD)STA=8+38ELEV=802.548"x6" TEE (HYD)STA=11+07ELEV=800.37TOP OF WMSTA=11+17ELEV=800.291099 LF - 8" DIP CL 527.5' MIN COVERRISER 3.0' RISER 3.5' RISER 4.0' RISER 4.0' RISER 4.0' RISER 3.5' RISER 3.0'TOP OF WMSTA=1+89ELEV=803.32TOP OF WMSTA=3+43ELEV=801.18TOP OF WMSTA=6+47ELEV=797.50TOP OF WMSTA=8+27ELEV=802.52TOP OF WMSTA=6+15ELEV=803.37TOP OF WMSTA=10+58ELEV=796.04BOT OF STMSTA=1+88ELEV=806.28BOT OF STMSTA=3+43ELEV=803.38BOT OF STMSTA=6+15ELEV=806.38BOT OF STMSTA=6+47ELEV=799.7BOT OF STMSTA=8+27ELEV=805.67BOT OF STMSTA=10+58ELEV=798.24N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-UTF01.DWG 384PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESSANITARY SEWER &WATERMAINCONSTRUCTION PLAN1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com50'10' OR 5'0'50'100'150'1" = 50'..........LEGENDSANITARY SEWER SERVICE WYE LOCATION ONMAIN LINE FROM DOWNSTREAM MANHOLESANITARY SEWER SERVICEINVERT ELEVATION @ EASEMENT LINEDENOTES ELEVATION OF THE TOP OF WATERSERVICE STOP BOXWATER SERVICE TO THIS LOT SHALL BEINSTALLED UNDER PROPOSED STORM SEWER& SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM VERTICALSEPARATION FROM STORM PIPE OF 2.0 FEETX.X' RISERXXX.XSANITARY SEWER SERVICE TO THIS LOT SHALLBE INSTALLED UNDER PROPOSED STORM SEWER- INSTALL RISER AT PROPERTY LINEWYE = X+XXBA1.FLAG HYDRANTS.2.EXTEND RODS ON DEEP VALVES.3.ALL DROP MANHOLES TO BE CONSTRUCTED USINGOUTSIDE DROPS.4.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST.TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OFCOTTAGE GROVE'S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREET &UTILITY CONSTRUCTION - 2024.GENERAL NOTESXXX.XSTREET 7802.1WYE = 2+51812.1801.8WYE = 2+04811.8801.5WYE = 1+57811.5801.5WYE = 1+20811.5801.8WYE = 0+74811.8802.2WYE = 0+31812.2802.6WYE = 3+08812.6803.0WYE = 2+67813.0801.6WYE = 0+603.5' RISER811.6802.3WYE = 1+073.5' RISER812.3803.3WYE = 2+203.0' RISER813.3803.0WYE = 1+543.5' RISER813.0800.3WYE = 1+15810.2799.6WYE = 1+84809.7799.1WYE = 0+54809.1798.7WYE =0+65809.0798.7WYE = 0+80808.8798.7WYE = 0+91808.6798.7WYE = 0+72808.4799.4WYE = 0+41808.5799.8WYE = 1+60809.9800.3WYE = 0+88810.4800.8WYE = 0+193.0' RISER810.9801.2WYE = 0+953.5' RISER811.4802.1WYE = 2+46812.1801.8WYE = 1+98811.8801.5WYE = 1+52811.5801.5WYE = 1+26811.5801.8WYE = 0+79811.8802.3812.3801.8801.8811.8811.8HYD w/ AUX VALVE10' - 6" DIP8" X 6" TEEGRND EL. = 811.9DRAINAGE & UTILITYEASEMENT (TYP.)1" COPPER SERVICEw/ CURB STOP (TYP.)4" PVC SCH 40SAN SERVICE (TYP.)STREET 9SEE SHEET 7 STREET 6 SEE SHEET 5HYD w/ AUX VALVE10' - 6" DIP8" X 6" TEEGRND EL. = 812.3HYD w/ AUX VALVE13' - 6" DIP8" X 6" TEEGRND EL. = 810.6HYD w/ AUX VALVE5' - 6" DIP8" X 6" REDUCERGRND EL. = 808.4STREET 8SEE SHEET 3 SEE SHEET 9802.9812.9802.6812.6802.3812.3801.7811.7801.5811.5801.5811.5801.5811.5801.6811.6802.9812.9ABABABABABABABABABABABABABABABSTREET 7 SEX-MHRE = 812.37CSSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOCSUSSSECS11423811.45USSSE11424811.57USSSECSCS11427811.76USSSESEX-MHRE = 811.45CS11430811.82USSSE11431812.33USSSECSCS11434812.88USSSE910111213141516171819123456789107891018171615141312112353033313211341245678 123401234567891045678 1234SMH-8MH-7MH-16MH-17MH-188" 22.5° BENDSTA 5+8410.2' L8" 22.5° BENDSTA 6+7010.2' L8" 22.5° BENDSTA 7+5610.2' L8" GVSTA 2+9110.2' L8" GVSTA 3+609.5' L8" GVSTA 9+399.2' LSTREET 67807857907958008058108158207807857907958008058108158200+001+002+003+004+005+006+007+008+009+009+50214 LF-8" PVC SDR 35 @ 0.40%MH-18STA: 7+56RE=810.34IE=797.19 (8" N)IE=797.09 (8" SE)D=13.2MH-17STA: 6+70RE=809.49IE=796.75 (8" NW)IE=796.65 (8" SE)D=12.8MH-16STA: 5+84RE=809.99IE=796.31 (8" NW)IE=796.21 (8" E)D=13.8MH-8STA: 3+30RE=811.72IE=794.42 (8" W)IE=794.41 (8" S)IE=794.42 (8" N)IE=794.32 (8" E)D=17.4MH-7STA: 0+69RE=811.88IE=793.27 (8" W)IE=781.04 (8" E)D=30.869 LF-8" PVC @0.39%261 LF-8" PVC SDR 35 @ 0.40%254 LF-8" PVC SDR 35 @ 0.71%86 LF-8" PVC SDR 35 @0.40%85 LF-8" PVCSDR 35 @0.40%TOP OF WMSTA=9+50ELEV=804.318" GVSTA=9+39ELEV=804.378"x6" TEE (HYD)STA=7+11ELEV=801.988" GVSTA=3+60ELEV=802.328"x8" CROSSSTA=3+40ELEV=802.368" GVSTA=2+90ELEV=803.80REMOVE TEMP HYDRANT & REDUCERSTA=0+64ELEV=804.21CONNECT TO EX. WMSTA=0+59ELEV=804.29902 LF - 8" DIP CL 527.5' MIN COVERRISER 5.5' RISER 4.5' RISER 4.5' RISER 4.5' RISER 4.5' RISER 3.5' RISER 3.0'TOP OF WMSTA=1+70ELEV=803.00TOP OF WMSTA=6+60ELEV=801.74BOT OF STMSTA=1+70ELEV=806.00TOP OF WMSTA=3+16ELEV=797.36BOT OF STMSTA=3+17ELEV=799.56BOT OF STMSTA=6+60ELEV=804.69N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-UTF01.DWG 385PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESSANITARY SEWER &WATERMAINCONSTRUCTION PLAN1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com50'10' OR 5'0'50'100'150'1" = 50'..........LEGENDSANITARY SEWER SERVICE WYE LOCATION ONMAIN LINE FROM DOWNSTREAM MANHOLESANITARY SEWER SERVICEINVERT ELEVATION @ EASEMENT LINEDENOTES ELEVATION OF THE TOP OF WATERSERVICE STOP BOXWATER SERVICE TO THIS LOT SHALL BEINSTALLED UNDER PROPOSED STORM SEWER& SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM VERTICALSEPARATION FROM STORM PIPE OF 2.0 FEETX.X' RISERXXX.XSANITARY SEWER SERVICE TO THIS LOT SHALLBE INSTALLED UNDER PROPOSED STORM SEWER- INSTALL RISER AT PROPERTY LINEWYE = X+XXBA1.FLAG HYDRANTS.2.EXTEND RODS ON DEEP VALVES.3.ALL DROP MANHOLES TO BE CONSTRUCTED USINGOUTSIDE DROPS.4.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST.TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OFCOTTAGE GROVE'S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREET &UTILITY CONSTRUCTION - 2024.GENERAL NOTESXXX.XSTREET 6802.5WYE = 1+19812.5801.0WYE = 0+21811.0801.9WYE = 0+74811.9800.5WYE =2+28810.5800.9WYE = 1+78810.9801.3WYE = 1+233.0' RISER811.3801.8WYE = 0+773.5' RISER811.8799.9WYE = 0+59809.9802.8WYE = 1+44812.8802.0WYE = 0+79811.9801.1WYE = 0+14811.0800.3WYE = 0+57810.3799.6WYE = 0+07810.0799.4WYE = 0+66809.9799.9WYE = 0+06810.3801.5WYE = 2+09810.7801.7WYE = 1+854.5' RISER811.7801.3WYE = 1+404.5' RISER811.3801.2WYE = 0+954.5' RISER811.2801.3WYE = 0+704.5' RISER811.3801.9WYE = 0+255.5' RISER811.9HYD w/ AUX VALVE14' - 6" DIP8" X 6" TEEGRND EL. = 809.9DRAINAGE & UTILITYEASEMENT (TYP.)STREET 7 SEE SHEET 41" COPPER SERVICEw/ CURB STOP (TYP.)4" PVC SCH 40SAN SERVICE (TYP.)REMOVE HYDRANT ASSEMBLEY & CONNECTTO EXISTING 8" DIP WATER MAINREMOVE PLUG & CONNECT MHTO EXISTING SANITARY STUBABABABABABABABABMATCH LINE - 09+50 SEE SHEET 6STREET 6 91.00 15123456 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 1 2 OUTLOT A 1617 16 17 18OUTLOT D8 3 4 910111213141516 8 3 4MH-6MH-21MH-208" GVSTA 12+989.2' L8" GVSTA 10+0511.2' L8" GVSTA 13+5610.7' LMH-5MH-19STREET 67907958008058108158207907958008058108158209+5010+0011+0012+0013+0014+0015+0016+0016+50MH-6STA: 15+04RE=813.33IE=801.33 (8" S)D=12.0154 LF-8" PVC SDR 35 @ 0.95%MH-5STA: 13+25RE=811.87IE=799.87 (8" N)IE=799.77 (8" E)D=12.1MH-21STA: 12+96RE=811.70IE=799.65 (8" S)D=12.0MH-20STA: 11+97RE=811.16IE=799.15 (8" N)IE=799.05 (8" S)D=12.199 LF-8" PVCSDR 35 @0.51%227 LF-8" PVC SDR 35 @ 0.40%MH-19STA: 9+70RE=812.95IE=798.15 (8" N)IE=798.05 (8" S)D=14.9HYDSTA=15+14ELEV=805.318" GVSTA=13+56ELEV=804.358"x8" TEESTA=13+35ELEV=803.718" GVSTA=12+98ELEV=803.618" GVSTA=10+05ELEV=804.578"x8" TEESTA=9+79ELEV=804.66TOP OF WMSTA=9+50ELEV=804.31538 LF - 8" DIP CL 527.5' MIN COVER8"x6" REDUCERSTA=15+04ELEV=805.3110 LF - 6" DIP CL 527.5' MIN COVERTOP OF WMSTA=12+08ELEV=803.40TOP OF WMSTA=11+47ELEV=799.18BOT OF STMSTA=11+46ELEV=801.38BOT OF STMSTA=12+07ELEV=806.35N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-UTF01.DWG 386PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESSANITARY SEWER &WATERMAINCONSTRUCTION PLAN1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com50'10' OR 5'0'50'100'150'1" = 50'..........LEGENDSANITARY SEWER SERVICE WYE LOCATION ONMAIN LINE FROM DOWNSTREAM MANHOLESANITARY SEWER SERVICEINVERT ELEVATION @ EASEMENT LINEDENOTES ELEVATION OF THE TOP OF WATERSERVICE STOP BOXWATER SERVICE TO THIS LOT SHALL BEINSTALLED UNDER PROPOSED STORM SEWER& SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM VERTICALSEPARATION FROM STORM PIPE OF 2.0 FEETX.X' RISERXXX.XSANITARY SEWER SERVICE TO THIS LOT SHALLBE INSTALLED UNDER PROPOSED STORM SEWER- INSTALL RISER AT PROPERTY LINEWYE = X+XXBA1.FLAG HYDRANTS.2.EXTEND RODS ON DEEP VALVES.3.ALL DROP MANHOLES TO BE CONSTRUCTED USINGOUTSIDE DROPS.4.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST.TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OFCOTTAGE GROVE'S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREET &UTILITY CONSTRUCTION - 2024.GENERAL NOTESXXX.XSTREET 6803.8WYE = 1+47813.4803.8WYE = 0+99813.1803.8WYE = 0+36812.6802.0WYE = 0+93812.0802.0WYE = 0+32811.6801.3WYE = 2+22811.5801.9WYE = 1+58812.0802.6WYE = 0+92812.6802.8WYE = 0+27813.2HYD w/ AUX VALVE5' - 6" DIP8" X 6" REDUCERGRND EL. = 813.21" COPPER SERVICEw/ CURB STOP (TYP.)4" PVC SCH 40SAN SERVICE (TYP.)STTREET 8SEE SHEET 3 STTREET 9 SEE SHEET 7 MATCH LINE - 09+50 SEE SHEET 5STREET 6 678910111101112131415123910431116171812OUTLOT D23451234891011 12234512348" GVSTA 0+3010.0' R8" GVSTA 4+269.1' RMH-19MH-12MH-11MH-98" 11.25° BENDSTA 3+9810.5' RSTREET 97907958008058108158207907958008058108158200+001+002+003+004+005+00MH-12STA: 3+96RE=812.48IE=800.48 (8" E)D=12.0MH-11STA: 2+93RE=811.70IE=799.70 (8" W)IE=799.60 (8" E)D=12.1MH-9STA: -0+00RE=812.06IE=798.43 (8" W)IE=798.43 (8" N)IE=798.33 (8" S)D=13.7293 LF-8" PVCSDR 35 @0.40%103 LF-8" PVC SDR 35 @ 0.75%TOP OF WMSTA=4+70ELEV=804.668" GVSTA=4+28ELEV=804.868"x6" TEE (HYD)STA=4+20ELEV=804.908" GVSTA=0+30ELEV=803.61TOP OF WMSTA=0+10ELEV=803.71463 LF - 8" DIP CL 527.5' MIN COVERTOP OF WMSTA=4+46ELEV=798.73TOP OF WMSTA=1+49ELEV=801.83BOT OF STMSTA=1+48ELEV=804.03BOT OF STMSTA=4+46ELEV=800.93N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-UTF01.DWG 387PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESSANITARY SEWER &WATERMAINCONSTRUCTION PLAN1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com50'10' OR 5'0'50'100'150'1" = 50'..........LEGENDSANITARY SEWER SERVICE WYE LOCATION ONMAIN LINE FROM DOWNSTREAM MANHOLESANITARY SEWER SERVICEINVERT ELEVATION @ EASEMENT LINEDENOTES ELEVATION OF THE TOP OF WATERSERVICE STOP BOXWATER SERVICE TO THIS LOT SHALL BEINSTALLED UNDER PROPOSED STORM SEWER& SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM VERTICALSEPARATION FROM STORM PIPE OF 2.0 FEETX.X' RISERXXX.XSANITARY SEWER SERVICE TO THIS LOT SHALLBE INSTALLED UNDER PROPOSED STORM SEWER- INSTALL RISER AT PROPERTY LINEWYE = X+XXBA1.FLAG HYDRANTS.2.EXTEND RODS ON DEEP VALVES.3.ALL DROP MANHOLES TO BE CONSTRUCTED USINGOUTSIDE DROPS.4.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST.TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OFCOTTAGE GROVE'S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREET &UTILITY CONSTRUCTION - 2024.GENERAL NOTESXXX.XSTREET 9802.8WYE = 0+95812.8802.5WYE = 0+55812.5802.2WYE = 0+10812.2801.9WYE = 2+63811.9801.6WYE = 2+18811.6801.2WYE = 1+73811.2801.5WYE = 2+12811.5801.2WYE = 1+59811.2801.2WYE = 1+29811.2801.6WYE = 0+79811.6STREET 6SEE SHEET 6STREET 7 SEE SHEET 41" COPPER SERVICEw/ CURB STOP (TYP.)4" PVC SCH 40SAN SERVICE (TYP.)STREET 6SEE SHEET 5DRAINAGE & UTILITYEASEMENT (TYP.)HYD w/ AUX VALVE11' - 6" DIP8" X 6" TEEGRND EL. = 812.8ABABSTREET 9 SEX-MHRE = 810.70SANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN WATWATWAT STOST O STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO1234567891011121212312661OUTLOT D72012345 012345 ST0 1 13 14 15 234501230+00.00STOSTO MH-22D=32.48" 22.5° BENDSTA 2+8310.0' R8" 45° BENDSTA 4+134.4' LMH-25MH-24MH-238"x8" TEESTA 0+3810.0' R8" GVSTA 0+2910.0' R8"x8" TEESTA 3+3215.9' LSTREET 37757807857907958008058108158207757807857907958008058108158200+001+002+003+004+005+006+00MH-25STA: 4+24RE=813.10IE=801.10 (8" NE)D=12.0108 LF-8" PVC SDR 35 @ 1.33%MH-24STA: 2+80RE=811.67IE=799.67 (8" SW)IE=799.57 (8" E)D=12.1232 LF-8" PVC SDR 35 @ 3.54%MH-23STA: 0+48RE=809.43IE=791.35 (8" W)IE=791.35 (8" E)IE=779.58 (8" N)D=29.848 LF-8" PVCSDR 35 @0.40%MH-22STA: 0+00RE=809.67IE=791.64 (8" S)IE=791.54 (8" W)D=18.1HYDSTA=4+02ELEV=805.298"x8" TEESTA=3+32ELEV=804.538" GVSTA=0+29ELEV=800.93TOP OF WMSTA=0+15ELEV=800.808"x8" TEESTA=0+38ELEV=801.00392 LF - 8" DIP CL 527.5' MIN COVER8"x6" REDUCERSTA=3+92ELEV=805.2210 LF - 6" DIP CL 527.5' MIN COVERRISER 3.5'TOP OF WMSTA=0+58ELEV=801.25BOT OF STMSTA=0+58ELEV=804.58SAN OFF STREET 37757807857907958008058108157757807857907958008058108150+001+002+00MH-23STA: 0+00RE=809.43IE=791.35 (8" W)IE=791.35 (8" E)IE=779.58 (8" N)D=29.850 LF-8" PVCC900 @ 0.56%EX 169 LF-8" PVC @ 0.56%TOP OF WMSTA=0+10ELEV=801.00REMOVE PLUG & CONNECT TO EX. WMSTA=0+76ELEV=803.1466 LF - 8" DIP CL 527.5' MIN COVERRISER 17.5'POHPOHSEX-MH RE = 809.53 SEX-MH RE = 810.70 SANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO12111212370 1 2012 STS0114152STO8" SANITARY STUB-4278" IE=779.30MH-238" GVSTA 0+7610.0' RN:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-UTF01.DWG 388PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESSANITARY SEWER &WATERMAINCONSTRUCTION PLAN1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com50'10' OR 5'0'50'100'150'1" = 50'..........LEGENDSANITARY SEWER SERVICE WYE LOCATION ONMAIN LINE FROM DOWNSTREAM MANHOLESANITARY SEWER SERVICEINVERT ELEVATION @ EASEMENT LINEDENOTES ELEVATION OF THE TOP OF WATERSERVICE STOP BOXWATER SERVICE TO THIS LOT SHALL BEINSTALLED UNDER PROPOSED STORM SEWER& SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM VERTICALSEPARATION FROM STORM PIPE OF 2.0 FEETX.X' RISERXXX.XSANITARY SEWER SERVICE TO THIS LOT SHALLBE INSTALLED UNDER PROPOSED STORM SEWER- INSTALL RISER AT PROPERTY LINEWYE = X+XXBA1.FLAG HYDRANTS.2.EXTEND RODS ON DEEP VALVES.3.ALL DROP MANHOLES TO BE CONSTRUCTED USINGOUTSIDE DROPS.4.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST.TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OFCOTTAGE GROVE'S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREET &UTILITY CONSTRUCTION - 2024.GENERAL NOTESXXX.XSTREET 3MH 23 STUB799.4WYE = 0+623.5' RISER810.1799.4WYE = 1+23810.8799.2WYE = 1+90811.8799.1WYE = 0+18812.4799.0WYE = 0+64813.0798.8WYE = 0+81813.3799.4WYE = 1+03813.4799.4WYE = 0+88813.4799.2WYE = 0+43813.1799.3WYE = 1+96811.7798.4WYE = 1+30810.9800.5WYE = 1+8817.5' RISER810.2HYD w/ AUX VALVE5' - 6" DIP8" X 6" REDUCERGRND EL. = 813.2REMOVE PLUG & CONNECTTO EXISTING 8" DIP WATER MAINREMOVE PLUG & CONNECTTO EXISTING SANITARY STUBSEE SHEET 9 STREET 1 SEE SHEET 9 STREET 1STREET 3STREET 31" COPPER SERVICEw/ CURB STOP (TYP.)4" PVC SCH 40SAN SERVICE (TYP.) S EX-MH RE = 809.53 S EX-MH RE = 810.70 SANSANSANSANSAN SAN SANSANSANWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWAT STO STOSTO STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1234 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 6 HADLEY AVENUE SOUTHSTREET 3 OUTLOT D 0123 451011120123 45101112ST S011314150123 458" 45° BENDSTA 3+940.0'8" 45° BENDSTA 3+740.0'8" 45° BENDSTA 2+420.0'8" 45° BENDSTA 2+060.0'8" 45° BENDSTA 0+100.0'8" 22.5° BEND& 11.25° BENDSTA 0+260.0'8" 22.5° BENDSTA 5+340.0'7907958008058108158207907958008058108158200+001+002+003+004+005+006+00TOP OF WMSTA=0+00ELEV=800.29TOP OF WMSTA=5+86ELEV=804.53586 LF - 8" DIP CL 527.5' MIN COVERTOP OF WMSTA=2+10ELEV=794.70BOT OF STMSTA=2+10ELEV=797.08STREET 178579079580080581081578579079580080581081512+5013+0014+0015+00MH-22STA: 14+44RE=809.67IE=791.64 (8" S)IE=791.54 (8" W)D=18.1141 LF-8" PVC SDR 35 @ 0.40%8" SANITARY STUB-22A8" IE=792.21FUT 215 LF-8" PVC SDR 35 @ 0.40%TOP OF WMSTA=14+53ELEV=800.808"x6" TEE (HYD)STA=14+15ELEV=801.348"x6" TEE (HYD)STA=14+03ELEV=801.518" PLUGSTA=13+20ELEV=800.66136 LF - 8" DIP CL 527.5' MIN COVERRISER 5.0'RISER 4.0'RISER 4.0'S EX-MHRE = 810.70SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SANSANSANSANWATWATWATSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO12111212123126172012012STS01121314152STOSTOSTOMH-228" SANITARY STUB-22A8" IE=792.218" 45° BENDSTA 14+4810.0' L8" 45° BENDSTA 14+5314.9' L8" GVSTA 14+1510.0' LN:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-UTF01.DWG 389PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESSANITARY SEWER &WATERMAINCONSTRUCTION PLAN1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com50'10' OR 5'0'50'100'150'1" = 50'..........LEGENDSANITARY SEWER SERVICE WYE LOCATION ONMAIN LINE FROM DOWNSTREAM MANHOLESANITARY SEWER SERVICEINVERT ELEVATION @ EASEMENT LINEDENOTES ELEVATION OF THE TOP OF WATERSERVICE STOP BOXWATER SERVICE TO THIS LOT SHALL BEINSTALLED UNDER PROPOSED STORM SEWER& SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM VERTICALSEPARATION FROM STORM PIPE OF 2.0 FEETX.X' RISERXXX.XSANITARY SEWER SERVICE TO THIS LOT SHALLBE INSTALLED UNDER PROPOSED STORM SEWER- INSTALL RISER AT PROPERTY LINEWYE = X+XXBA1.FLAG HYDRANTS.2.EXTEND RODS ON DEEP VALVES.3.ALL DROP MANHOLES TO BE CONSTRUCTED USINGOUTSIDE DROPS.4.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST.TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OFCOTTAGE GROVE'S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREET &UTILITY CONSTRUCTION - 2024.GENERAL NOTESXXX.XSTREET 1BACKYARD WATER MAIN800.0WYE = 0+325.0' RISER809.7799.5WYE = 1+004.0' RISER809.0799.5WYE = 0+944.0' RISER809.2FOR SERVICELOCATIONSEE SHEET 8DRAINAGE & UTILITYEASEMENT (TYP.)1" COPPER SERVICEw/ CURB STOP (TYP.)4" PVC SCH 40SAN SERVICE (TYP.)HYD w/ AUX VALVE10' - 6" DIP8" X 6" TEEGRND EL. = 809.58" PLUGSTREET 3SEE SHEET 8 STREET 3 SEE SHEET 8 STREET 1SEE SHEET 9STREET 7SEE SHEET 4STREET 1 POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOH POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHSSTS STMHSANSANSANSAN WATWATWATWATWATSANSTOSTOSTOSTO STOSTOSTOSTOSAN SAN SAN SAN STSST12345678910111213141561234567891013141512322145OUTLOT A161716172324012345678121314 1516112 1314 15161 012345678S0 130'B-B60'ROWSTMH-134CBMH-135CB-136STMH-120CBMH-121CB-122R 2 0 ' ( T Y P ) R20' (TYP)STREET 87907958008058108158208258300+001+002+003+004+005+006+007+008+009+00102 LF-15" RCP CL 5 @ 0.50%78 LF-15" RCPCL 5 @ 0.50%27 LF-12" RCPCL 5 @ 0.50%27 LF-12" RCPCL 5 @ 0.50%813.6 813.35 813.2 812.98 810.1 812.60 809.4 812.23 809.3 811.85 809.2 811.69 808.9 812.04 808.9 812.59 808.3 813.14 807.6 813.47 806.8813.28806.1812.86805.7812.44805.4812.03805.7811.61806.0811.24806.5811.24807.1811.59807.60.75%1.10%-0.83%-0.75%-0.75%PVI STA = 0+00.00 PVI ELEV = 813.35 PVI STA = 0+47.00 PVI ELEV = 813.00 PVI STA = 8+93.47PVI ELEV = 811.92 L.P ELEV = 811.69L.P. STA = 2+40.53PVI STA = 2+49.00PVI ELEV = 811.48A.D. = 1.85%K = 48.7090.00' VCPVC = 2+04.00 ELEV = 811.82 PVT = 2+94.00 ELEV = 811.98 L.P ELEV = 811.19L.P. STA = 7+74.36PVI STA = 7+72.00PVI ELEV = 811.01A.D. = 1.58%K = 56.8590.00' VCPVC = 7+27.00ELEV = 811.38PVT = 8+17.00ELEV = 811.35 H.P ELEV = 813.48H.P. STA = 4+56.17PVI STA = 4+50.00PVI ELEV = 813.69A.D. = -1.93%K = 46.6190.00' VCPVC = 4+05.00 ELEV = 813.20 PVT = 4+95.00ELEV = 813.32102 LF-15" RCP CL 5 @ 0.50%STMH-134STA: 8+79RE=811.62IE=805.82 (15" E)IE=805.82 (15" S)D=5.8STMH-120STA: 3+19RE=811.99IE=806.44 (15" E)IE=806.44 (15" S)D=5.6CBMH-121CB-122STA: 2+41RE=811.17IE=807.17 (12" S)D=4.0CBMH-135CB-136STA: 7+75RE=810.67IE=806.67 (12" S)D=4.0CBMH-135STA: 7+74RE=810.67IE=806.53 (12" N)IE=806.33 (15" W)D=4.3CBMH-121STA: 2+41RE=811.17IE=807.03 (12" N)IE=806.83 (15" W)D=4.3STREET 87907958008058108158208258307907958008058108158208258300+001+002+003+004+005+006+007+008+009+009+50102 LF-15" RCP CL 5 @ 0.50%78 LF-15" RCPCL 5 @ 0.50%27 LF-12" RCPCL 5 @ 0.50%27 LF-12" RCPCL 5 @ 0.50%813.6 813.35 813.2 812.98 810.1 812.60 809.4 812.23 809.3 811.85 809.2 811.69 808.9 812.04 808.9 812.59 808.3 813.14 807.6 813.47 806.8813.28806.1812.86805.7812.44805.4812.03805.7811.61806.0811.24806.5811.24807.1811.59807.60.75%1.10%-0.83%-0.75%-0.75%PVI STA = 0+00.00 PVI ELEV = 813.35 PVI STA = 0+47.00 PVI ELEV = 813.00 PVI STA = 8+93.47PVI ELEV = 811.92 L.P ELEV = 811.69L.P. STA = 2+40.53PVI STA = 2+49.00PVI ELEV = 811.48A.D. = 1.85%K = 48.7090.00' VCPVC = 2+04.00 ELEV = 811.82 PVT = 2+94.00 ELEV = 811.98 L.P ELEV = 811.19L.P. STA = 7+74.36PVI STA = 7+72.00PVI ELEV = 811.01A.D. = 1.58%K = 56.8590.00' VCPVC = 7+27.00ELEV = 811.38PVT = 8+17.00ELEV = 811.35 H.P ELEV = 813.48H.P. STA = 4+56.17PVI STA = 4+50.00PVI ELEV = 813.69A.D. = -1.93%K = 46.6190.00' VCPVC = 4+05.00 ELEV = 813.20 PVT = 4+95.00ELEV = 813.32102 LF-15" RCP CL 5 @ 0.50%STMH-134STA: 8+79RE=811.62IE=805.82 (15" E)IE=805.82 (15" S)D=5.8STMH-120STA: 3+19RE=811.99IE=806.44 (15" E)IE=806.44 (15" S)D=5.6CBMH-121CB-122STA: 2+41RE=811.17IE=807.17 (12" S)D=4.0CBMH-135CB-136STA: 7+75RE=810.67IE=806.67 (12" S)D=4.0CBMH-135STA: 7+74RE=810.67IE=806.53 (12" N)IE=806.33 (15" W)D=4.3CBMH-121STA: 2+41RE=811.17IE=807.03 (12" N)IE=806.83 (15" W)D=4.3N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-STF01.DWG 3810PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESSTREET & STORM SEWERCONSTRUCTION PLAN1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com50'10' OR 5'0'50'100'150'1" = 50'..........STREET 8LEGEND1.RADIUS TO BE B618 CURB & GUTTER WITH 10' TRANSITIONSFROM SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER.2.ALL RCP SHALL BE CLASS 5, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.3.ALL CATCH BASIN CASTINGS IN CURB SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15FEET. MANHOLE CASTINGS IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED0.05 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PROFILES REFLECTTHE SUMPED ELEVATIONS.4.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST.TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OFCOTTAGE GROVE'S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREET &UTILITY CONSTRUCTION - 20245.PENDING APPROVAL OF 2025 COTTAGE GROVE SPECIFICATIONS,ALL STORM SEWER PIPE TO BE HDPE IN LIEU OF RCP. ALL RUNSOF PIPE CONNECTING TO FES WILL REMAIN RCP.GENERAL NOTESEXISTINGPROPOSEDGUTTER ELEVATION900.00900.00STA 0+50 BEGIN STREET CONSTRUCTIONMATCH EXISTINGSURMOUNTABLE CONCRETECURB & GUTTER (TYP.)5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYP.)1' INSIDE ROW (TYP.)PED. RAMP w/TRUNCATED DOME (TYP.)ADJUST MH (TYP.)CONSTRUCT CONCRETEHYDRANT PAD (TYP.)STREET 6SEE SHEET 13STREET 7 SEE SHEET 11 STREET 5PROFILE CSEE SHEET 13STREET 8TRAIL 1SEE SHEET 20 STREET 77907958008058108158208257907958008058108158208250+001+002+003+004+005+006+007+008+009+0010+0011+0012+0013+00175 LF-15" RCP CL 5 @ 0.50%154 LF-18" RCP CL 5 @ 0.50%272 LF-21" RCP CL 4 @ 0.50%32 LF-21" RCPCL 4 @ 0.50%176 LF-30" RCP CL 3 @ 0.40%233 LF-33" RCP CL 3 @ 0.25%27 LF-12" RCPCL 5 @ 0.50%1.76%0.85%-0.75%-1.45%1.65%-0.81%PVI STA = 0+00.00PVI ELEV = 812.37 PVI STA = 12+52.22 PVI ELEV = 809.16PVI STA = 6+60.08PVI ELEV = 811.77L.P ELEV = 807.83L.P. STA = 11+57.90PVI STA = 11+68.00PVI ELEV = 807.68A.D. = 2.56%K = 21.2454.40' VCPVC = 11+40.80 ELEV = 807.90 PVT = 11+95.20 ELEV = 808.16 L.P ELEV = 811.12L.P. STA = 1+88.30PVI STA = 1+91.00PVI ELEV = 810.94A.D. = 1.60%K = 56.4090.00' VCPVC = 1+46.00ELEV = 811.28PVT = 2+36.00ELEV = 811.32L.P ELEV = 811.22L.P. STA = 6+14.50PVI STA = 6+16.00PVI ELEV = 811.04A.D. = 3.10%K = 15.0046.44' VCPVC = 5+92.78ELEV = 811.38PVT = 6+39.22ELEV = 811.43H.P ELEV = 813.01H.P. STA = 4+52.12PVI STA = 4+63.94PVI ELEV = 813.25A.D. = -2.29%K = 39.2490.00' VCPVC = 4+18.94ELEV = 812.87PVT = 5+08.94ELEV = 812.59808.8812.37809.1812.00809.3811.62809.6811.25809.9811.13809.6811.44809.0811.86808.1812.28808.2812.71808.6813.00 809.5 812.71 809.3 812.00 809.5 811.29 808.7 811.60 808.0 811.45 807.8 811.05 808.8 810.64 809.1 810.24 808.4 809.84 808.7 809.44 809.0 809.03 808.6 808.63 810.4 808.23 809.1 807.85 808.8 808.24 809.1 809.12STMH-120STA: 0+13RE=811.99IE=806.44 (15" E)IE=806.44 (15" S)D=5.6CBMH-113STA: 3+43RE=811.70IE=801.80 (18" N)IE=803.59 (15" W)IE=801.60 (21" S)D=10.1CBMH-117STA: 1+89RE=810.60IE=805.56 (15" N)IE=806.46 (12" W)IE=802.97 (12" E)IE=802.57 (18" S)D=8.0CBMH-111STA: 6+15RE=810.71IE=806.56 (12" W)IE=800.24 (21" N)IE=800.24 (21" S)D=10.5STMH-107STA: 6+47RE=811.30IE=799.95 (27" W)IE=800.08 (21" N)IE=803.64 (15" E)IE=799.95 (30" S)D=11.4CBMH-104STA: 8+27RE=809.94IE=799.24 (30" N)IE=800.87 (12" E)IE=805.87 (12" W)IE=799.24 (33" S)D=10.7CBMH-103STA: 10+58RE=808.22IE=798.66 (33" N)IE=798.66 (33" W)D=9.6CBMH-111CB-112STA: 6+15RE=810.71IE=806.70 (12" E)D=4.0CBMH-104CB-105STA: 8+27RE=809.91IE=806.01 (12" E)D=3.927 LF-12" RCPCL 5 @ 0.50%CBMH-11727 LF-12" RCPCL 5 @ 0.50%CB-118STA: 1+89RE=810.60IE=806.60 (12" E)D=4.0S ST ST SANSANSANWATWATSTOSTOSTO1234567891011 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 6 7 891011121314 5 6 7 8 910 123456789 10 2219181716 15 14 13 12 11 2 3 55 30 333132 2120112324 34 12 12345 12345123456 78910111212 12345123456 7891011121234512 16 1718192 0 21 0100+00.000+27.05STMH-120STMH-107CBMH-104CB-105CBMH-103CBMH-113CBMH-117CB-118R 4 7 ' R20'R2 0 ' ( T Y P )CBMH-111CB-11230'B-B 60' ROW POND 3NWL=798.0BOT=788.0HWL=800.8EOF=808.7INF. CELLOUTLET=798.0BOT=796.0HWL=800.8EOF=804.0ULT. EOF=808.7BERM=802.0N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-STF01.DWG 3811PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESSTREET & STORM SEWERCONSTRUCTION PLAN1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com50'10' OR 5'0'50'100'150'1" = 50'..........LEGEND1.RADIUS TO BE B618 CURB & GUTTER WITH 10' TRANSITIONSFROM SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER.2.ALL RCP SHALL BE CLASS 5, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.3.ALL CATCH BASIN CASTINGS IN CURB SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15FEET. MANHOLE CASTINGS IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED0.05 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PROFILES REFLECTTHE SUMPED ELEVATIONS.4.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST.TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OFCOTTAGE GROVE'S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREET &UTILITY CONSTRUCTION - 2024.5.PENDING APPROVAL OF 2025 COTTAGE GROVE SPECIFICATIONS,ALL STORM SEWER PIPE TO BE HDPE IN LIEU OF RCP. ALL RUNSOF PIPE CONNECTING TO FES WILL REMAIN RCP.GENERAL NOTESEXISTINGPROPOSEDGUTTER ELEVATION900.00900.00SURMOUNTABLE CONCRETECURB & GUTTER (TYP.)5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYP.)1' INSIDE ROW (TYP.)PED. RAMP w/TRUNCATED DOME (TYP.)ADJUST MH (TYP.)ADJUST G.V. (TYP.)CONSTRUCT CONCRETEHYDRANT PAD (TYP.)STREET 8SEE SHEET 10 STREET 6 SEE SHEET 12 STREET 6 SEE SHEET 12STREET 7PROFILE FSEE SHEET 16 PROFILE G SEE SHEET 16 PROFILE HSEE SHEET 16PROFILE DSEE SHEET 14STREET 9SEE SHEET 14 PROFILE BSEE SHEET 12STREET 7TRAIL 1SEE SHEET 20 STREET 67907958008058108158208258307907958008058108158208258300+001+002+003+004+005+006+007+008+009+009+50246 LF-24" RCP CL 3 @ 0.20%89 LF-24" RCP CL 3 @ 0.20%71 LF-27" RCP CL 3 @0.20%110 LF-27" RCPCL 3 @ 0.20%154 LF-27" RCPCL 3 @ 0.20%147 LF-15" RCP CL 5 @ 0.50%27 LF-12" RCPCL 5 @ 0.50%1.42%-0.75%0.75%-0.89%-1.55%PVI STA = 0+00.00 PVI ELEV = 812.70 L.P ELEV = 810.84L.P. STA = 1+69.52PVI STA = 1+54.00PVI ELEV = 810.61A.D. = 2.30%K = 39.0990.00' VCPVC = 1+09.00 ELEV = 811.31 PVT = 1+99.00 ELEV = 810.95 L.P ELEV = 809.54L.P. STA = 6+66.17PVI STA = 6+80.00PVI ELEV = 809.32A.D. = 2.17%K = 41.5690.00' VCPVC = 6+35.00ELEV = 809.65PVT = 7+25.00ELEV = 809.95 H.P ELEV = 811.77H.P. STA = 3+30.13PVI STA = 3+30.00PVI ELEV = 811.94A.D. = -1.50%K = 59.8390.00' VCPVC = 2+85.00 ELEV = 811.60 PVT = 3+75.00 ELEV = 811.60 H.P ELEV = 813.00H.P. STA = 9+67.67PVI STA = 9+58.00PVI ELEV = 813.25A.D. = -2.33%K = 38.6290.00' VCPVC = 9+13.00ELEV = 812.61 812.9 812.70 812.6 812.22 810.5 811.45 810.4 810.89 810.4 810.96 809.9 811.34 809.2 811.69 808.3 811.74 807.4 811.42 806.6 811.04 806.5810.66806.6810.29807.0809.92807.8809.57808.2809.67808.3810.31808.7811.01808.5811.72808.1812.43807.6812.96CBMH-128STA: 7+57RE=809.89IE=800.80 (24" N)IE=800.80 (24" SE)D=9.1CBMH-126STA: 6+60RE=809.02IE=800.62 (24" NW)IE=804.88 (12" SW)IE=800.62 (27" E)D=8.4CBMH-125STA: 5+84RE=809.52IE=800.48 (27" W)IE=800.48 (27" E)D=9.0CBMH-123STA: 4+71RE=810.37IE=802.82 (12" N)IE=800.26 (27" W)IE=800.26 (27" E)D=13.1CBMH-108STA: 1+70RE=810.32IE=804.58 (12" N)IE=806.18 (12" S)IE=804.38 (15" W)D=5.9STMH-107STA: 3+17RE=811.30IE=799.95 (27" W)IE=800.08 (21" N)IE=803.64 (15" E)IE=799.95 (30" S)D=11.4CBMH-126CB-127STA: 6+60RE=809.02IE=805.02 (12" NE)D=4.0SSTSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTS91011121314151617181912345678910789101817161514131211235303331321134120123456789 1045678 123401234567891045678 1234S89101112131430' B-B 60' ROWR20' (TYP)CB-109CBMH-108CBMH-123CBMH-125CBMH-126CB-127CBMH-128CB-110CB-124STMH-107CBMH123 - CB1247958008058108157958008058108150+501+002+003+00151 LF-12" RCP CL 5 @ 0.50%CB-124STA: 2+51RE=807.08IE=803.58 (12" S)D=3.5CBMH-123CBMH123 - CB124CBMH 109 - CB 1108008058108158008058108150+001+002+0027 LF-12" RCPCL 5 @ 0.50%126 LF-12" RCP CL 5 @ 0.50%CBMH-108CB-109STA: 0+00RE=810.32IE=806.32 (12" N)D=4.0CB-110STA: 1+53RE=808.21IE=805.21 (12" S)D=3.0N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-STF01.DWG 3812PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESSTREET & STORM SEWERCONSTRUCTION PLAN1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com50'10' OR 5'0'50'100'150'1" = 50'..........LEGEND1.RADIUS TO BE B618 CURB & GUTTER WITH 10' TRANSITIONSFROM SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER.2.ALL RCP SHALL BE CLASS 5, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.3.ALL CATCH BASIN CASTINGS IN CURB SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15FEET. MANHOLE CASTINGS IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED0.05 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PROFILES REFLECTTHE SUMPED ELEVATIONS.4.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST.TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OFCOTTAGE GROVE'S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREET &UTILITY CONSTRUCTION - 2024.5.PENDING APPROVAL OF 2025 COTTAGE GROVE SPECIFICATIONS,ALL STORM SEWER PIPE TO BE HDPE IN LIEU OF RCP. ALL RUNSOF PIPE CONNECTING TO FES WILL REMAIN RCP.GENERAL NOTESEXISTINGPROPOSEDGUTTER ELEVATION900.00900.00SURMOUNTABLE CONCRETECURB & GUTTER (TYP.)5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYP.)1' INSIDE ROW (TYP.)PED. RAMP w/TRUNCATED DOME (TYP.)ADJUST G.V. (TYP.)CONSTRUCT CONCRETEHYDRANT PAD (TYP.)STREET 7 SEE SHEET 11STREET 6SEE PROFILE A SEE PROFILE B PROFILE APROFILE BMATCH LINE - 09+50 SEE SHEET 13STA 0+69BEGIN STREET CONSTRUCTIONMATCH EXISTINGSTREET 6PROFILE KSEE SHEET 17TRAIL 1SEE SHEET 20ADJUST MH (TYP.) STREET 67958008058108158208258307958008058108158208258309+5010+0011+0012+0013+0014+0015+0016+0016+50106 LF-15" RCP CL 5 @ 0.50%60 LF-15" RCPCL 5 @ 1.00%141 LF-24" RCP CL 3 @ 0.20%27 LF-12" RCPCL 5 @ 0.50%807.6 812.96 808.1 812.86 808.7 812.41 809.3 811.95 809.1 811.49 808.5811.20808.0811.38807.5811.78807.1812.18806.8812.58806.4812.98806.5813.37806.7813.10806.7812.72-0.77%-0.91%0.80%PVI STA = 16+28.22PVI ELEV = 812.50 L.P ELEV = 811.20L.P. STA = 12+06.01PVI STA = 12+03.00PVI ELEV = 811.01A.D. = 1.71%K = 52.4990.00' VCPVC = 11+58.00 ELEV = 811.42 PVT = 12+48.00ELEV = 811.37 PVT = 10+03.00 ELEV = 812.84 H.P ELEV = 813.38H.P. STA = 15+06.94PVI STA = 15+06.69PVI ELEV = 813.44A.D. = -1.57%K = 18.1328.50' VCPVC = 14+92.44ELEV = 813.32PVT = 15+20.94ELEV = 813.33CBMH-132STA: 1+34RE=810.69IE=805.29 (15" N)IE=806.54 (12" W)IE=805.29 (15" S)D=5.4CBMH-130STA: 1+91RE=811.01IE=804.69 (15" N)IE=804.29 (12" E)IE=801.57 (15" W)IE=801.57 (24" S)D=9.4CBMH-129STA: 3+22RE=812.30IE=801.29 (24" N)IE=801.29 (24" S)D=11.0STMH-134STA: 0+30RE=811.62IE=805.82 (15" E)IE=805.82 (15" S)D=5.8CBMH-132CB-133STA: 1+41RE=810.68IE=806.68 (12" E)D=4.091.00 15123456 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 1 2 OUTLOT A 1617 16 17 18OUTLOT D8 910111213141516 3 4 910111213141516 8 3 4012345678 9CBMH-129CBMH-130CBMH-132CB-133STMH-134R47'R20' (TYP.)30'B-B60'ROWCB-138CBMH-137CB-131CB 204 - CBMH 1317958008058108157958008058108150+001+002+003+004+005+005+40265 LF-12" RCP CL 5 @ 0.50%168 LF-15" RCP CL 5 @ 0.50%100 LF-12" RCP CL 5 @ 0.50%CBMH-130CB-138STA: 0+00RE=807.23IE=803.73 (12" S)D=3.5CBMH-137STA: 2+65RE=808.15IE=802.41 (12" N)IE=802.41 (15" E)D=5.7CB-131STA: 5+33RE=808.29IE=804.79 (12" W)D=3.5N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-STF01.DWG 3813PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESSTREET & STORM SEWERCONSTRUCTION PLAN1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com50'10' OR 5'0'50'100'150'1" = 50'..........LEGEND1.RADIUS TO BE B618 CURB & GUTTER WITH 10' TRANSITIONSFROM SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER.2.ALL RCP SHALL BE CLASS 5, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.3.ALL CATCH BASIN CASTINGS IN CURB SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15FEET. MANHOLE CASTINGS IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED0.05 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PROFILES REFLECTTHE SUMPED ELEVATIONS.4.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST.TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OFCOTTAGE GROVE'S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREET &UTILITY CONSTRUCTION - 2024.5.PENDING APPROVAL OF 2025 COTTAGE GROVE SPECIFICATIONS,ALL STORM SEWER PIPE TO BE HDPE IN LIEU OF RCP. ALL RUNSOF PIPE CONNECTING TO FES WILL REMAIN RCP.GENERAL NOTESEXISTINGPROPOSEDGUTTER ELEVATION900.00900.00SURMOUNTABLE CONCRETECURB & GUTTER (TYP.)5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYP.)1' INSIDE ROW (TYP.)PED. RAMP w/TRUNCATED DOME (TYP.)ADJUST MH (TYP.)CONSTRUCT CONCRETEHYDRANT PAD (TYP.)STREET 8SEE SHEET 10 STREET 9 SEE SHEET 14STREET 6SEE PROFILE C BELOWPROFILE CSEE PROFILE C BELO W MATCH LINE - 09+50 SEE SHEET 12TRAIL 1SEE SHEET 20STREET 6ADJUST G.V. (TYP.) STREET 97958008058108158208257958008058108158208250+001+002+003+004+005+00161 LF-15" RCP CL 5 @ 0.40%-1.08%0.75%PVI STA = 0+00.00 PVI ELEV = 812.11 PVI STA = 4+59.45PVI ELEV = 813.00L.P ELEV = 810.80L.P. STA = 1+48.03PVI STA = 1+40.00PVI ELEV = 810.60A.D. = 1.83%K = 49.3090.00' VCPVC = 0+95.00ELEV = 811.09PVT = 1+85.00ELEV = 810.94 808.6 812.11 807.9 811.57 807.2811.04806.7810.80806.3811.05806.3811.43806.4811.80806.6812.18806.9812.55807.5812.93CBMH-114STA: 1+48RE=810.29IE=804.23 (15" N)IE=804.23 (15" E)D=6.1CBMH-113STA: -0+13RE=811.70IE=801.80 (18" N)IE=803.59 (15" W)IE=801.60 (21" S)D=10.189101111011121314151239104311161718128910111223451234891011 122345123491030'B-B60'ROW CBMH-115CBMH-114CB-116CBMH-113CB 136 - CBMH 1348008058108158008058108150+001+002+002+30152 LF-12" RCP CL 5 @ 0.50%27 LF-15" RCPCL 5 @ 0.40%CBMH-114CB-116STA: 1+79RE=808.80IE=805.30 (12" S)D=3.5CBMH-115STA: 0+27RE=810.29IE=804.54 (12" N)IE=804.34 (15" S)D=5.9N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-STF01.DWG 3814PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESSTREET & STORM SEWERCONSTRUCTION PLAN1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com50'10' OR 5'0'50'100'150'1" = 50'..........LEGEND1.RADIUS TO BE B618 CURB & GUTTER WITH 10' TRANSITIONSFROM SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER.2.ALL RCP SHALL BE CLASS 5, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.3.ALL CATCH BASIN CASTINGS IN CURB SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15FEET. MANHOLE CASTINGS IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED0.05 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PROFILES REFLECTTHE SUMPED ELEVATIONS.4.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST.TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OFCOTTAGE GROVE'S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREET &UTILITY CONSTRUCTION - 2024.5.PENDING APPROVAL OF 2025 COTTAGE GROVE SPECIFICATIONS,ALL STORM SEWER PIPE TO BE HDPE IN LIEU OF RCP. ALL RUNSOF PIPE CONNECTING TO FES WILL REMAIN RCP.GENERAL NOTESEXISTINGPROPOSEDGUTTER ELEVATION900.00900.005' CONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYP.)1' INSIDE ROW (TYP.)PED. RAMP w/TRUNCATED DOME (TYP.)ADJUST MH (TYP.)ADJUST G.V. (TYP.)CONSTRUCT CONCRETEHYDRANT PAD (TYP.)STREET 6SEE SHEET 13STREET 7 SEE SHEET 11STREET 9STREET 6SEE SHEET 12SEE PROFILE D BELOWPROFILE DSURMOUNTABLE CONCRETECURB & GUTTER (TYP.)STREET 9PROFILE CSEE SHEET 12 STREET 37807857907958008058108158208257807857907958008058108158208250+001+002+003+004+005+006+00101 LF-15" RCP CL 5 @ 0.35%27 LF-12" RCPCL 5 @ 0.50%197 LF-15" RCP CL 5 @ 0.35%15 LF-18" RCPCL 5 @ 0.40%-1.25%-0.75%1.18%PVI STA = 0+00.00 PVI ELEV = 809.72 PVI STA = 5+51.60PVI ELEV = 811.84 L.P ELEV = 809.41L.P. STA = 0+58.14PVI STA = 0+68.23PVI ELEV = 809.21A.D. = 1.93%K = 46.5690.00' VCPVC = 0+23.23 ELEV = 809.55 PVT = 1+13.23ELEV = 809.74 H.P ELEV = 813.15H.P. STA = 4+23.54PVI STA = 4+24.81PVI ELEV = 813.43A.D. = -2.43%K = 36.9790.00' VCPVC = 3+79.81ELEV = 812.89PVT = 4+69.81ELEV = 812.86807.8 809.72 808.1 809.42 808.2 809.60 808.4810.18808.7810.77809.4811.36809.9811.95810.1812.54810.4813.08810.8813.06810.4812.49809.8811.86CBMH-412STA: 1+59RE=809.76IE=804.21 (15" E)IE=804.21 (15" S)D=5.6CBMH-413STA: 0+58RE=808.90IE=804.76 (12" N)IE=804.56 (15" W)D=4.3CB-414STA: 0+58RE=808.90IE=804.90 (12" S)D=4.0CBMH-413STORM STUB18" IE=802.68CBMH-410STA: 1+97RE=807.51IE=802.74 (12" W)IE=803.52 (15" N)IE=802.74 (18" S)D=4.8CBMH-412SANSANSAN WATWAT STOST O STO123456789101112121231266OUTLOT D212 13 14 15 012345 012345 0 1 12345678 12 13 14 15 30'B-B 60' ROW CB-414CBMH-413CBMH-412R47'R20' (TYP)STORM STUB18" IE=802.68CBMH-410CB-411CB 411 - CBMH 4108008058108008058100+001+002+002+40180 LF-12" RCP CL 5 @ 0.50%CB-411STA: 1+80RE=807.14IE=803.64 (12" E)D=3.5CBMH-410STREET 179079580080581081582079079580080581081582012+5013+0014+0015+00806.9 808.10 806.8 808.26 807.0 808.77 807.5 809.28 807.9 809.79 810.3 810.30 1.02%PVI STA = 15+00.00PVI ELEV = 810.30PVT = 13+00.65 ELEV = 808.26 S ST ST SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SANSANSANWATWATWATSTO STOSTOSTOSTO STO STO STO STO STO STO 12 11 12 1 2 1 2 3 1 26 1 7 2 12131415012 STOSTOSTO STO 012 ST S0100 1 12131415R 2 0 ' ( T Y P )30'B-B60'ROWPOND 3NWL=798.0BOT=788.0HWL=800.8EOF=808.7N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-STF01.DWG 3815PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESSTREET & STORM SEWERCONSTRUCTION PLAN1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com50'10' OR 5'0'50'100'150'1" = 50'..........LEGEND1.RADIUS TO BE B618 CURB & GUTTER WITH 10' TRANSITIONSFROM SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER.2.ALL RCP SHALL BE CLASS 5, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.3.ALL CATCH BASIN CASTINGS IN CURB SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15FEET. MANHOLE CASTINGS IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED0.05 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PROFILES REFLECTTHE SUMPED ELEVATIONS.4.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST.TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OFCOTTAGE GROVE'S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREET &UTILITY CONSTRUCTION - 2024.5.PENDING APPROVAL OF 2025 COTTAGE GROVE SPECIFICATIONS,ALL STORM SEWER PIPE TO BE HDPE IN LIEU OF RCP. ALL RUNSOF PIPE CONNECTING TO FES WILL REMAIN RCP.GENERAL NOTESEXISTINGPROPOSEDGUTTER ELEVATION900.00900.00PED. RAMP w/TRUNCATED DOME (TYP.)ADJUST MH (TYP.)ADJUST G.V. (TYP.)CONSTRUCT CONCRETEHYDRANT PAD (TYP.)STREET 1STREET 3STA 13+30BEGIN STREET CONSTRUCTIONSTREET 3STREET 1STA 15+00END STREET CONSTRUCTIONMATCH EXISTING5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYP.)1' INSIDE ROW (TYP.)ADJUST MH (TYP.)CONSTRUCT CONCRETEHYDRANT PAD (TYP.)ADJUST G.V. (TYP.)PROFILE ESEE PROFILE E BELOWPROFILE MSEE SHEET 18SURMOUNTABLE CONCRETECURB & GUTTER (TYP.)SURMOUNTABLE CONCRETECURB & GUTTER (TYP.)STREET 3TRAIL 2SEE SHEET 20PROFILE I SEE SHEE T 17 STREET 1FUTURE PHASEFUTURE PHASE CBMH 118 - CB 1198008058108158008058108150+001+002+00146 LF-12" RCP CL 5 @ 0.50%CBMH-117CB-119STA: 1+74RE=807.20IE=803.70 (12" W)D=3.5111212345225212023242341212 234CB-118CBMH-117CB-11918192028298131230333132341234678 91234678 9CB-105CB-106CBMH-104CBMH 105 - CB 1067958008058108157958008058108150+001+002+003+00CBMH-104CB-106STA: 2+33RE=805.40IE=801.90 (12" W)D=3.5205 LF-12" RCP CL 5 @ 0.50%CBMH 103 - FES 1007958008058108157958008058108150+001+002+003+003+5091 LF-33" RCPCL 3 @ 0.25%150 LF-36" RCP CL 3 @ 0.21%54 LF-36" RCPCL 3 @ 0.21%CBMH-103CBMH-102STA: 0+91RE=807.31IE=798.43 (33" E)IE=798.43 (36" W)D=8.9STMH-101STA: 2+41RE=804.41IE=798.12 (36" E)IE=798.12 (36" SW)D=6.3FES-100STA: 2+96IE=798.00 (36")202122232425262728910111291011121718 19200 1POND 3FES-100STMH-101CBMH-102CBMH-103POND 3NWL=798.0BOT=788.0HWL=800.8EOF=808.7INF. CELLOUTLET=798.0BOT=796.0HWL=800.8EOF=804.0ULT. EOF=808.7BERM=802.0N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-STF01.DWG 3816PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESBACKYARD STORMSEWER CONSTRUCTIONPLAN1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com50'### OR ##0'50'100'150'1" = 50'..........LEGEND1.RADIUS TO BE B618 CURB & GUTTER WITH 10' TRANSITIONSFROM SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER.2.ALL RCP SHALL BE CLASS 5, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.3.ALL CATCH BASIN CASTINGS IN CURB SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15FEET. MANHOLE CASTINGS IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED0.05 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PROFILES REFLECTTHE SUMPED ELEVATIONS.4.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST.TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OFCOTTAGE GROVE'S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREET &UTILITY CONSTRUCTION - 2024.5.PENDING APPROVAL OF 2025 COTTAGE GROVE SPECIFICATIONS,ALL STORM SEWER PIPE TO BE HDPE IN LIEU OF RCP. ALL RUNSOF PIPE CONNECTING TO FES WILL REMAIN RCP.GENERAL NOTESEXISTINGPROPOSEDGUTTER ELEVATION900.00900.00PROFILE FPROFILE GPROFILE HSTREET 8SEE SHEET 10STREET 7SEE SHEET 11STREET 7SEE SHEET 11 STREET 6SEE SHEET 12STREET 7SEE SHEET 11 OCS 700 - STMH 2707857907958008058108157857907958008058108150+001+002+003+003+25FES 700 - FES 70243 LF-12" RCPCL 5 @ 0.45%OCS-703STA: 0+00RE=801.30IE=798.00 (12" E)D=7.8STMH-300STA: 1+91RE=807.66IE=800.32 (12" NE)IE=797.25 (12" W)IE=797.25 (12" E)D=10.4191 LF-12" RCP CL 5 @ 0.39%12" STORM SEWER STUB-432IE=797.06EX 40 LF-12"RCP CL 5 @0.44%SSTSSTSTSANSANSANSANSAN SANSANSANSAN WATWATWAT WATWATWATWATWAT WATWATSTOSTO STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTO123416OUTLOT D15 105TH STREET SOUTHSTS1 2021001215 CB-301OCS-703STMH-300EX STMH-270RE=810.91D=25.0STORM STUB12" IE=797.06CB 201 - FES 2007958008058107958008058100+001+0061 LF-12" RCPCL 5 @ 1.25%CB-201STA: 0+00RE=802.26IE=798.76 (12" SE)D=3.5FES-200STA: 0+61IE=798.00 (12")13141516212131415CB-201FES-200CB 301 - STMH 3007907958008058108157907958008058108150+001+0056 LF-12" RCPCL 5 @ 0.50%STMH-300CB-301STA: 0+00RE=804.10IE=800.60 (12" SW)D=3.5OUTLOT C1718 19FES-702OCS-701FES-700FES 700 - FES 7027907958008058107907958008058100+001+0011 LF-24" RCPCL 3 @ 2.31%33 LF-24" RCPCL 3 @ 0.30%FES-700STA: 0+00IE=796.00 (24")OCS-701STA: 0+11RE=801.30IE=796.26 (24" N)IE=798.00 (24" S)D=7.0FES-702STA: 0+44IE=797.90 (24")INF. CELLOUTLET=798.0BOT=796.0HWL=800.8EOF=804.0ULT. EOF=808.7BERM=802.0POND 3NWL=798.0BOT=788.0HWL=800.8EOF=808.7INF. CELLOUTLET=798.0BOT=796.0HWL=800.8EOF=804.0ULT. EOF=808.7BERM=802.0N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-STF01.DWG 3817PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESBACKYARD STORMSEWER CONSTRUCTIONPLAN1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com50'### OR ##0'50'100'150'1" = 50'..........LEGEND1.RADIUS TO BE B618 CURB & GUTTER WITH 10' TRANSITIONSFROM SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER.2.ALL RCP SHALL BE CLASS 5, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.3.ALL CATCH BASIN CASTINGS IN CURB SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15FEET. MANHOLE CASTINGS IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED0.05 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PROFILES REFLECTTHE SUMPED ELEVATIONS.4.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST.TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OFCOTTAGE GROVE'S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREET &UTILITY CONSTRUCTION - 2024.5.PENDING APPROVAL OF 2025 COTTAGE GROVE SPECIFICATIONS,ALL STORM SEWER PIPE TO BE HDPE IN LIEU OF RCP. ALL RUNSOF PIPE CONNECTING TO FES WILL REMAIN RCP.GENERAL NOTESEXISTINGPROPOSEDGUTTER ELEVATION900.00900.00PROFILE IPROFILE JPROFILE KPROFILE L (OCS)TRAIL 2SEE SHEET 20TRAIL 1SEE SHEET 20TRAIL 1SEE SHEET 20PROFILE HSEE SHEET 16TRAIL 1SEE SHEET 20 FES 800 - OCS 8047958008058108157958008058108150+001+002+003+004+005+006+007+008+008+5077 LF-24" RCPCL 3 @ 0.25%304 LF-24" RCP CL 3 @ 0.25%351 LF-24" RCP CL 3 @ 0.25%54 LF-18" RCPCL 5 @ 0.25%FES-800STA: 0+00IE=798.00 (24")CBMH-801STA: 0+77RE=804.17IE=798.20 (24" S)IE=798.20 (24" N)D=6.0STMH-802STA: 3+81RE=811.49IE=798.97 (24" S)IE=798.97 (24" N)D=12.5CBMH-803STA: 7+32RE=804.00IE=799.86 (18" SE)IE=799.86 (24" N)D=4.1OCS-804STA: 7+86RE=803.40IE=800.00 (18" NW)D=7.945678910 5 6 7 8 9 6 6 2 OUTL O T BOUTLOT A4 54 54534567 8910111213140 1 2345012345670+00.00 7+85.60FES-800CBMH-801STMH-802CBMH-803OCS-804POND 3NWL=798.0BOT=788.0HWL=800.8EOF=808.7POND 2NWL=800.0BOTTOM=790.0HWL=803.4EOF=805.7ULT. EOF=805.7BERM=806.5N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-STF01.DWG 3818PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESBACKYARD STORMSEWER CONSTRUCTIONPLAN1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com50'10' OR 5'0'50'100'150'1" = 50'..........LEGEND1.RADIUS TO BE B618 CURB & GUTTER WITH 10' TRANSITIONSFROM SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER.2.ALL RCP SHALL BE CLASS 5, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.3.ALL CATCH BASIN CASTINGS IN CURB SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15FEET. MANHOLE CASTINGS IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED0.05 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PROFILES REFLECTTHE SUMPED ELEVATIONS.4.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST.TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OFCOTTAGE GROVE'S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREET &UTILITY CONSTRUCTION - 2024.5.PENDING APPROVAL OF 2025 COTTAGE GROVE SPECIFICATIONS,ALL STORM SEWER PIPE TO BE HDPE IN LIEU OF RCP. ALL RUNSOF PIPE CONNECTING TO FES WILL REMAIN RCP.GENERAL NOTESEXISTINGPROPOSEDGUTTER ELEVATION900.00900.00PROFILE MSTREET 3SHEET 15 TRAIL 2 SHEET##PROFILE E SHEET 15 FUTURE PHASE FES 900 - OCS 9037907958008058107907958008058100+001+002+003+004+004+5046 LF-21" RCPCL 4 @ 0.24%286 LF-21" RCP CL 4 @ 0.24%89 LF-21" RCPCL 4 @ 0.24%FES-900STA: 0+00IE=800.00 (21")STMH-901STA: 0+46RE=804.14IE=800.11 (21" S)IE=800.11 (21" N)D=4.0CBMH-902STA: 3+32RE=804.47IE=800.79 (21" S)IE=800.79 (21" N)D=3.7OCS-903STA: 4+21RE=804.00IE=801.00 (21" N)D=7.5891011 12 13 14 15 16 3 OUTL O T C OUTL O T A 231516171819202 1 22 2323012340+00.00 4+21.24 FES-900STMH-901CBMH-902OCS-903POND 2NWL=800.0BOTTOM=790.0HWL=803.4EOF=805.7ULT. EOF=805.7BERM=806.5POND 1NWL=801.0BOTTOM=791.0HWL=802.8EOF=805.7BERM=806.5N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-STF01.DWG 3819PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESBACKYARD STORMSEWER CONSTRUCTIONPLAN1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com50'10' OR 5'0'50'100'150'1" = 50'..........LEGEND1.RADIUS TO BE B618 CURB & GUTTER WITH 10' TRANSITIONSFROM SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER.2.ALL RCP SHALL BE CLASS 5, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.3.ALL CATCH BASIN CASTINGS IN CURB SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15FEET. MANHOLE CASTINGS IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED0.05 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PROFILES REFLECTTHE SUMPED ELEVATIONS.4.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST.TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OFCOTTAGE GROVE'S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREET &UTILITY CONSTRUCTION - 2024.5.PENDING APPROVAL OF 2025 COTTAGE GROVE SPECIFICATIONS,ALL STORM SEWER PIPE TO BE HDPE IN LIEU OF RCP. ALL RUNSOF PIPE CONNECTING TO FES WILL REMAIN RCP.GENERAL NOTESEXISTINGPROPOSEDGUTTER ELEVATION900.00900.00PROFILE NFUTURE PHASE SANSANSANWATWAT WAT STOSTOSTOSTO33.0091.00 10111213141512345678910111213 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8910111213141512345678910 1 2 3 45 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 45 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 2 2 43 6 6 2 3 3 4 4 1 OUTL O T B OUTL O T C STREET 8 STREET 7STREET 7STREET 9 STREET 1STREET 6STREET 6STREET 1STREE T 3 STREET 2 STREE T 2 OUTL O T D OUTLOT A30 31 11OUTLOT A 1617 161718 12OUTLOT D2 ST S010123456789101112 1 3 14 15 16 1718192021 0+00.00 21+83.120 0 1 2 3 456789101112131415161718-0+42.12TRAIL 18008058108158208258308358408008058108158208258308358400+001+002+003+004+005+006+007+008+009+0010+0011+0012+0013+0014+0015+0016+0017+0018+0019+0020+0021+0022+0022+50-0.66%0.56%0.00%3.46%-1.63%-4.85%-1.03%0.20%PVI STA = 0+00.00PVI ELEV = 813.11 PVI STA = 21+83.13 PVI ELEV = 804.48 L.P ELEV = 809.91L.P. STA = 3+23.91PVI STA = 2+86.41PVI ELEV = 810.16A.D. = 0.37%K = 202.3575.00' VCPVC = 2+48.91ELEV = 810.55PVT = 3+23.91ELEV = 809.91 L.P ELEV = 809.28L.P. STA = 4+33.58PVI STA = 4+31.50PVI ELEV = 809.20A.D. = 1.22%K = 41.0750.00' VCPVC = 4+06.50ELEV = 809.37PVT = 4+56.50ELEV = 809.34 L.P ELEV = 802.43L.P. STA = 14+09.77PVI STA = 13+84.77PVI ELEV = 802.43A.D. = 4.85%K = 10.3050.00' VCPVC = 13+59.77 ELEV = 803.64 PVT = 14+09.77 ELEV = 802.43 L.P ELEV = 802.43L.P. STA = 20+98.83PVI STA = 21+23.83PVI ELEV = 802.43A.D. = 3.46%K = 14.4450.00' VCPVC = 20+98.83ELEV = 802.43PVT = 21+48.83ELEV = 803.29H.P ELEV = 811.91H.P. STA = 10+73.84PVI STA = 10+93.33PVI ELEV = 811.95A.D. = -1.83%K = 27.3550.00' VCPVC = 10+68.33 ELEV = 811.90 PVT = 11+18.33 ELEV = 811.54 H.P ELEV = 811.47H.P. STA = 8+52.90PVI STA = 8+27.90PVI ELEV = 811.42A.D. = -0.36%K = 140.3450.00' VCPVC = 8+02.90ELEV = 811.28PVT = 8+52.90ELEV = 811.47 H.P ELEV = 810.03H.P. STA = 12+11.59PVI STA = 12+36.59PVI ELEV = 809.62A.D. = -3.23%K = 15.4950.00' VCPVC = 12+11.59 ELEV = 810.03 PVT = 12+61.59 ELEV = 808.41 TRAIL 28008058108158208258308358408008058108158208258308358400+001+002+003+004+005+006+007+008+009+0010+0011+0012+0013+0014+0015+0016+0017+0018+0019+0020+0021+0022+0023+0024+0025+0026+0027+0028+000.77%-0.79%-4.87%0.00%0.51%-4.53%0.00%-0.53%-1.53%1.65%0.00%1.53%5.00%2.40%PVI STA = -0+42.13PVI ELEV = 811.39PVI STA = 27+21.77PVI ELEV = 807.29L.P ELEV = 802.50L.P. STA = 1+65.45PVI STA = 1+40.45PVI ELEV = 802.50A.D. = 4.87%K = 10.2750.00' VCPVC = 1+15.45ELEV = 803.72PVT = 1+65.45ELEV = 802.50 L.P ELEV = 802.50L.P. STA = 4+07.24PVI STA = 4+37.24PVI ELEV = 802.50A.D. = 5.00%K = 12.0060.00' VCPVC = 4+07.24ELEV = 802.50PVT = 4+67.24ELEV = 804.00L.P ELEV = 807.13L.P. STA = 12+44.95PVI STA = 12+19.95PVI ELEV = 807.26A.D. = 0.99%K = 50.3350.00' VCPVC = 11+94.95 ELEV = 807.64 PVT = 12+44.95 ELEV = 807.13 L.P ELEV = 805.57L.P. STA = 15+49.23PVI STA = 15+54.76PVI ELEV = 805.47A.D. = 1.31%K = 45.9260.00' VCPVC = 15+24.76 ELEV = 805.63 PVT = 15+84.76 ELEV = 805.71 L.P ELEV = 804.50L.P. STA = 21+70.62PVI STA = 21+40.62PVI ELEV = 804.50A.D. = 4.53%K = 13.2560.00' VCPVC = 21+10.62 ELEV = 805.86 PVT = 21+70.62 ELEV = 804.50 L.P ELEV = 804.50L.P. STA = 22+22.63PVI STA = 22+52.63PVI ELEV = 804.50A.D. = 1.65%K = 36.3660.00' VCPVC = 22+22.63ELEV = 804.50PVT = 22+82.63ELEV = 805.00L.P ELEV = 806.50L.P. STA = 26+45.21PVI STA = 26+70.21PVI ELEV = 806.50A.D. = 1.53%K = 32.6350.00' VCPVC = 26+45.21 ELEV = 806.50 PVT = 26+95.21 ELEV = 806.88 H.P ELEV = 808.38H.P. STA = 5+67.74PVI STA = 5+42.74PVI ELEV = 807.77A.D. = -2.60%K = 19.2550.00' VCPVC = 5+17.74ELEV = 806.52PVT = 5+67.74ELEV = 808.38 H.P ELEV = 810.78H.P. STA = 6+87.25PVI STA = 6+62.25PVI ELEV = 810.65A.D. = -1.89%K = 26.4850.00' VCPVC = 6+37.25ELEV = 810.05PVT = 6+87.25ELEV = 810.78H.P ELEV = 811.82H.P. STA = 8+98.44PVI STA = 9+13.30PVI ELEV = 811.94A.D. = -2.04%K = 29.3960.00' VCPVC = 8+83.30 ELEV = 811.79 PVT = 9+43.30 ELEV = 811.48 H.P ELEV = 808.36H.P. STA = 19+43.16PVI STA = 19+43.45PVI ELEV = 808.48A.D. = -1.56%K = 38.4060.00' VCPVC = 19+13.45ELEV = 808.25PVT = 19+73.45ELEV = 808.24H.P ELEV = 807.67H.P. STA = 20+45.76PVI STA = 20+75.76PVI ELEV = 807.44A.D. = -3.74%K = 16.0460.00' VCPVC = 20+45.76ELEV = 807.67PVT = 21+05.76ELEV = 806.08H.P ELEV = 806.50H.P. STA = 24+03.82PVI STA = 23+73.82PVI ELEV = 806.50A.D. = -1.65%K = 36.3660.00' VCPVC = 23+43.82ELEV = 806.00PVT = 24+03.82ELEV = 806.50N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-TRL01.DWG 3820PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESTRAILS 1 & 21650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com100'20' OR 10'0'100'200'300'1" = 100'..........TRAIL 1TRAIL 2STA 0+00BEGIN TRAIL CONSTRUCTIONTRAIL 1TRAIL 2STA -0+42BEGIN TRAIL CONSTRUCTIONSTA 09+27END TRAIL CONSTRUCTIONFUTURE PHASE 3 812.06811.46811.73812.062.40%2.40% 0.85%812.412.40%811.82HP11.6811.85812.11811.360.85% 2.40%CBMH-113RE=811.70IE=801.60 (21")811.362.40%2.40%811.462.0%0.8% 0.7%2.20%1.96%1.08%STREET 7STREET 9104HP: 9+67.670.91%1.78%1.66%2.40%2.40%2.40%2.40%0.7%0.7%0.8%0.7%HP12.6HP12.6CBMH-129RE=812.30IE=801.29 (24")812.36812.53812.49812.390.75%0.92%STREET 6 STREET 93331.10%811.76811.63812.76811.762.40%1.10%2.40% 2.40% 0.75% STREET 7812.10HP11.8812.00812.37812.402.40%STREET 80.9% 0.7%1.9%2.06% 2 . 0 4%2.00%2.54%2.44%2.40%2.40%1.10%1.10%2.13%13811.34811.29811.29811.90HP11.51.0%0.7%1.8%811.662.40%2.40%2.40%2.40%2.40%2.40%811.92811.34811.901.64%2.01%0.80%0.75%STREET 6 STREET 81.54%812.26811.69N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-INF01.DWG 3821PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESINTERSECTION DETAILS1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com10'### OR ##0'10'20'30'1" = 10'..........LEGENDGUTTER ELEVATIONTOP OF CURB ELEVATIONFLOW DIRECTIONTRUNCATED DOMESFLOW LINEBACK OF CURBLANDING AREA - 4'x 4'MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM2.0% SLOPE IN ALLDIRECTIONSSTORM SEWER900.00900.000.00%EXISTINGPROPOSEDTC 900.001.RADIUS TO BE B618 CURB & GUTTER WITH 10' TRANSITIONSFROM SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER.2.ALL RCP SHALL BE CLASS 5, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.3.ALL CATCH BASIN CASTINGS IN CURB SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15FEET. MANHOLE CASTINGS IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED0.05 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PROFILES REFLECTTHE SUMPED ELEVATIONS.4.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST.TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OFCOTTAGE GROVE'S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREET &UTILITY CONSTRUCTION - 2024.GENERAL NOTES SANSANSANSANSANSAN 00 14 15 14 15 1.02% LP 0+58.14 ELEV 809.41 0.75%CBMH-413RE=808.90IE=804.56 (15")CBMH-414RE=808.90IE=804.90 (12")809.09809.14808.99809.06810.16809.47HP9.2809.980.7%1.1%1. 0%2.40%1.02%1.02%810.092.40%MATCH EXISTING1. 9 8%1.57%STREET 1STREET 32.59%1 . 9 2%367HP: 3+30.13 LP: 6+14.500.00%0.75%0.75%1.65%1.65%0.8%0.7%0.7%1.0%1.1%1.1%1.1%CBMH-111RE=810.71IE=800.24 (21")CBMH-112RE=810.71IE=806.70 (12")811.15811.12811.482.40%2.40%810.89810.89811.262.40%2.40%811.31811.31811.66811.30811.302.40%2.40% 2.40%2.40%811.09HP11.4HP11.4811.121.54%1.65%2.43%2.16%2.04%STREET 7STREET 6N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-INF01.DWG 3822PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESINTERSECTION DETAILS1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com10'### OR ##0'10'20'30'1" = 10'..........LEGENDGUTTER ELEVATIONTOP OF CURB ELEVATIONFLOW DIRECTIONTRUNCATED DOMESFLOW LINEBACK OF CURBLANDING AREA - 4'x 4'MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM2.0% SLOPE IN ALLDIRECTIONSSTORM SEWER900.00900.000.00%EXISTINGPROPOSEDTC 900.001.RADIUS TO BE B618 CURB & GUTTER WITH 10' TRANSITIONSFROM SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER.2.ALL RCP SHALL BE CLASS 5, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.3.ALL CATCH BASIN CASTINGS IN CURB SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15FEET. MANHOLE CASTINGS IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED0.05 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PROFILES REFLECTTHE SUMPED ELEVATIONS.4.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST.TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OFCOTTAGE GROVE'S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREET &UTILITY CONSTRUCTION - 2024.GENERAL NOTES CROPCROPCROPCROPCROPCROPCROP014151616+28.22HP: 15+06.9400+00.000.01%0.80%0.77%812.35812.15812.15812.33813.061.39%HP13.60.73%0.60%812.78812.79812.49813.38812.82812.82812.58812.582.05%812.902.19%812.902.17%0.60%0.60%0.60%0.60 %1.73%1.73%2.4%2.4%812.26STREET 6 023 10111212+52.22LP: 11+57.900.81%1.76%HP808.92.40%2.40% 0.. 6 0 %807.87808.38808.79808.79809.16808.75808.24CBMH-102RE=807.31IE=798.43 (36")CBMH-103RE=808.22IE=798.66 (33")807.630.60%807.83808.02807.58808.161.2%1 . 1 1%2.7%807.83808.561.7%STREET 7 N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-INF01.DWG 3823PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESINTERSECTION DETAILS1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com10'2' OR 1'0'10'20'30'1" = 10'..........LEGENDGUTTER ELEVATIONTOP OF CURB ELEVATIONFLOW DIRECTIONTRUNCATED DOMESFLOW LINEBACK OF CURBLANDING AREA - 4'x 4'MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM2.0% SLOPE IN ALLDIRECTIONSSTORM SEWER900.00900.000.00%EXISTINGPROPOSEDTC 900.001.RADIUS TO BE B618 CURB & GUTTER WITH 10' TRANSITIONSFROM SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER.2.ALL RCP SHALL BE CLASS 5, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.3.ALL CATCH BASIN CASTINGS IN CURB SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15FEET. MANHOLE CASTINGS IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED0.05 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PROFILES REFLECTTHE SUMPED ELEVATIONS.4.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST.TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OFCOTTAGE GROVE'S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREET &UTILITY CONSTRUCTION - 2024.GENERAL NOTESPAVEMENT WIDTH 34 5 5HP 4+ 2 3 . 5 4 E L E V 8 1 3 . 1 5 1.1 8 %1.25%812.12812.10811.41812.00812.79HP813.55813.152.6%2.6 % 2 . 0%812.59812.72812.44812.76812.36811.41811.782.40%2.40% 2. 40%STREET 3N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-INF01.DWG 3824PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESINTERSECTION DETAILS1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com10'2' OR 1'0'10'20'30'1" = 10'..........LEGENDGUTTER ELEVATIONTOP OF CURB ELEVATIONFLOW DIRECTIONTRUNCATED DOMESFLOW LINEBACK OF CURBLANDING AREA - 4'x 4'MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM2.0% SLOPE IN ALLDIRECTIONSSTORM SEWER900.00900.000.00%EXISTINGPROPOSEDTC 900.001.RADIUS TO BE B618 CURB & GUTTER WITH 10' TRANSITIONSFROM SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER.2.ALL RCP SHALL BE CLASS 5, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.3.ALL CATCH BASIN CASTINGS IN CURB SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15FEET. MANHOLE CASTINGS IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED0.05 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PROFILES REFLECTTHE SUMPED ELEVATIONS.4.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST.TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OFCOTTAGE GROVE'S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREET &UTILITY CONSTRUCTION - 2024.GENERAL NOTES N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-DTF01.DWG 3825PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESDETAILS1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA11/21/24 RECORD PLANSCommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com###### OR ##.......... N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-DTF01.DWG 3826PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESDETAILS1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA11/21/24 RECORD PLANSCommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com###### OR ##.......... N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-DTF01.DWG 3827PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESDETAILS1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA11/21/24 RECORD PLANSCommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com###### OR ##.......... N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-DTF01.DWG 3828PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESDETAILS1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA11/21/24 RECORD PLANSCommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com###### OR ##.......... N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-DTF01.DWG 3829PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESDETAILS1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA11/21/24 RECORD PLANSCommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com###### OR ##.......... N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-DTF01.DWG 3830PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESDETAILS1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA11/21/24 RECORD PLANSCommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com###### OR ##..........TYPICAL SECTIONNOTES:1.RECYCLED MIXES ARE ALLOWED FOR BASEMIXTURES ONLY.2.NO RECYLCED MIXES ARE ALLOWED FORANY BITUMINOUS WEAR PLACED.A14'14'28'6'30'30'* BITUMINOUS WEDGE & CURB PROTECTION - PER DETAIL STR-27(VIRGIN WEAR COURSE - 1.5" TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,C) (SPWEA330C)TO BE PLACED UNDER FUTURE PROJECT BY OTHERS)BASE COURSE - 2.0" TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,C) (SPWEA330C)8" AGGREGATE BASE CL. 5 (100% CRUSHED)12" AGGREGATE BACKFILL1'TURF ESTABLISHMENT6" TOPSOIL RESPREAD3.00%2.40%1.50%10'5'1'0.5'16'6" CONCRETE WALK4" AGGREGATE BASE, CL. 5 (100% CRUSHED)D-428 SURMOUNTABLECONCRETE CURB & GUTTER(TYP)10'1.50%3.00%OCS 804OCS 903 48"OCS 70318"800.0803.4=9" 48"12"798.0801.3=9" 48"21"801.0804.0=9"IE = 801.0SUMP ELEV= 796.5IE = 800.0SUMP ELEV= 795.5IE = 798.0SUMP ELEV= 793.548_STO16.DWGPLATE NO.STANDARD DETAILSCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTASTO-16STANDARD SKIMMER STRUCTURELOWSIDEXXELEV.=XXX.XNWL ELEV.=XXX.XDOGHOUSES MUST BEMORTARED BOTH INSIDE ANDOUTSIDE OF STRUCTURESEE STORM SEWER SCHEDULEFOR SPECIFIC STRUCTURE.GRATE DETAILSECTION* D2' MINVARIESMANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE PLACED SO THATLOCATION IS PERPENDICULAR TO THE BARS.MANHOLE STEPS, NEENAH R1981J OR EQUAL, 16"MAX ON CENTER. ALUMINUM STEPS APPROVED.* D (TOP OF STRUCTURE SLOPE)9" OR 18"12" OR 24"DIAMETER48" DIA>48" DIAHOLE FOR XX" DIA. RCPHIGHSIDEOUTER RINGPROVIDE 4 - 1/2" SSANCHOR BOLTSFLAT STEEL BARS @ 4" O.C.NO PERPENDICULAR SUPPORTBARS ALLOWED FOR STRUCTURESLESS THAN 84" DIA.HOT-DIPPED GALVANIZED GRATE IN 2 SECTIONSWITH HEAVY DUTY HINGES ABLE TO SUPPORT250 LBS/SF AND BE ABLE TO REMOVE ONESECTION FOR ACCESS TO STEPS BY REMOVINGNUTS FROM TWO ANCHOR BOLTS. SUBMITSHOP DRAWINGS TO ENGINEER FOR REVIEWPRIOR TO FABRICATION.JANUARY 2024SKIMMER STRUCTURE6"6" AGGREGATE BACKFILL(MNDOT SPEC. 3149,H MOD.) 48"24"798.0801.3HOLE FOR 24" DIA. RCPIE=796.26=9"IE = 798.0SUMP ELEV= 794.26OCS 701TOP OF WEIR WALL = 800.86" ORIFICE IE =- 798.0TOP OF WEIR WALL = 803.415" ORIFICE IE =- 800.0TOP OF WEIR WALL = 802.86" ORIFICE IE =- 801.0 N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-DTF01.DWG 3831PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESMNDOT PEDESTRIANRAMP DETAILS1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA11/21/24 RECORD PLANSCommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com###### OR ##.......... N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-DTF01.DWG 3832PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESMNDOT PEDESTRIANRAMP DETAILS1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA11/21/24 RECORD PLANSCommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com###### OR ##.......... N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-DTF01.DWG 3833PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESMNDOT PEDESTRIANRAMP DETAILS1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA11/21/24 RECORD PLANSCommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com###### OR ##.......... N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-DTF01.DWG 3834PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESMNDOT PEDESTRIANRAMP DETAILS1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA11/21/24 RECORD PLANSCommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com###### OR ##.......... N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-DTF01.DWG 3835PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESMNDOT PEDESTRIANRAMP DETAILS1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA11/21/24 RECORD PLANSCommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com###### OR ##.......... N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-DTF01.DWG 3836PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESMNDOT PEDESTRIANRAMP DETAILS1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA11/21/24 RECORD PLANSCommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com###### OR ##.......... 123456789101112131415123456789101112 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 89101112131415123456 7 8 910 12345678910 1234 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 34 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 1 2 3 2219181716151413 121112 2 2 4 3 55 6 6 2 3 4 1 OUTLOT C OUTLOT BSTREET 6 STREET 8STREET 7STREET 8 STREET 7STREET 7STREET 9 HADLEY AVENUE SOUTHSTREET 1STREET 6STREET 6STREET 3 STREET 2 STREET 2 OUTLOT D OUTLOT A30 333132 212011OUTLOT A 1617 161718 2324 34 12OUTLOT D7 2 9101112131415012 34 5 60123 45105TH STREET SOUTHHADLEY AVENUE SOUTHST S S SPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHS HHHH SST S ST HH HH ST S S S SST SSSTSST CSCS ST ST ST WMH SANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN SAN SANWATWAT WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWAT WAT WAT STOSTOSTOSTO STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSANSAN STO STO HHCSSTST SHHSTHHCSCSSCSCSCSSTCSCSCSCSSCSCSCS HH ST S ST ST S PUGPUGPUG 2-1/C#6, #8GND CONNECT TO EXISTING CONDUIT PULL WIRE FROM NEW HAND HOLE LP-2STREET LIGHTLP-1 INSTALL SALVAGED STREET LIGHT REMOVE AND SALVAGE EXISTING STREET LIGHT PLACE HAND HOLE(HH-1) IN PLACE AND MAKE SPLICE CONNECTION REMOVE EXISTING BASE AND RESTORE TURF IN KIND HHHH-1 LP-1STREET LIGHTLP-3STREET LIGHTLP-4STREET LIGHTLP-6STREET LIGHTLP-5STREET LIGHTLP-7STREET LIGHTLP-9STREET LIGHTLP-8STREET LIGHTLP-10STREET LIGHTN:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-SSF01.DWG 3837PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESLIGHTING PLAN1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA11/21/24 RECORD PLANSCommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com70'### OR ##0'100'200'300'1" = 100'.......... LEGENDPOLE MOUNTED LUMINAIREHANDHOLE1.5” SCH 40 PVC CONDUITHHGENERAL NOTES1.ALL CONDUIT SHALL BE 1.5” SCH 40 PVC. HDPE CONDUIT IS NOT PERMITTED.2.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL CONDUCTORS SHALL BE COPPER, TYPE XHHW-2,(2)#6, (1)#83.THIS PLAN SPECIFIES CONDUIT SIZE, TYPE, AND GENERAL LOCATION. THE EXACTLOCATION WILL BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD.4.LIGHTING UNITS ARE TYPICALLY SET BACK 36" BEHIND THE BACK-OF-CURB TOCENTER OF FOUNDATION.5.ADDITIONAL LOCATIONS OF CONDUIT AND WIRING NOT IDENTIFIED MAY BEREQUIRED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. ADDITIONAL CONDUIT AND WIRINGADDED TO THE CONTRACT WILL BE PAID FOR AT THE CONTRACT UNIT PRICEREGARDLESS OF QUANTITY ADDED AND METHOD OF PLACEMENT REQUIRED.6.ALL CONDUIT SHALL BE TRENCHED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.7.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING THE CONNECTION OFTHE POWER FOR THE LIGHTING SYSTEM WITH ENERGY PROVIDER8.AT EXISTING POLE MOUNTED FIXTURE, CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL/TERMINATENEW CONDUCTORS AND EXTEND LIGHTING CIRCUIT AS SHOWN. ENSUREBRANCH BREAKER FEEDING EXTENDED LIGHTING CIRCUIT IS ADEQUATELY RATEDFOR THE TOTAL ELECTRICAL LOAD. TOTAL ELECTRICAL LOAD SHOULD NOTEXCEED 80% OF THE BRANCH BREAKER AMPACITY. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZEAPPROVED UL LISTED SPLICE/TERMINATION EQUIPMENT AND METHODS.9.INSTALLATION SHOULD COMPLY WITH THE 2024 CITY OF COTTAGE GROVESTANDARD FOR STREET AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION10.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST. TECHNIQUES AND TESTINGSHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE'S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONSFOR STREET & UTILITY CONSTRUCTION - 2024. 1234567891011121314151234567891011121314 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 89101112131415123456 7 8 910 12345678910 1234 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 34 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 2219181716151413 1211122 2 4 3 55 6 6 3 1 OUTLOT C OUTLOT BSTREET 6 STREET 8STREET 7STREET 8 STREET 7STREET 7STREET 9 HADLEY AVENUE SOUTHSTREET 1STREET 6STREET 6STREET 3 STREET 2 STREET 2 OUTLOT D OUTLOT A30 333132212011OUTLOT A 1617 161718 2324 3412OUTLOT D7 2 9101112131415012 34 5 60123 45105TH STREET SOUTHHADLEY AVENUE SOUTHST S S SPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHS HHHH SST S ST HH HH ST S S S SST SSSTSST CSCS ST ST ST WMHCROPCROPCROPCROPCROPCROP CROP SANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN SAN SANWATWAT WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWAT WAT WAT STOSTOSTOSTO STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSANSAN STO STO HHCSSTST SHHSTHHCSCSSCSCSCSSTCSCSCSCSSCSCSCSHH ST S ST ST S N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-SSF01.DWG 3838PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESSIGNAGE PLAN1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA11/21/24 RECORD PLANSCommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com99.9998'20' OR 10'0'100'200'300'1" = 100'.......... LEGENDSIGN (SINGLE POST)EXISTINGPROPOSEDSIGN (DOUBLE POST)1.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST.TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OFCOTTAGE GROVE'S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREET &UTILITY CONSTRUCTION - 2024.GENERAL NOTESFUTUREROADEXTENSIONINSTALLBARRICADES (2-EA)(SEE DETAILS STR-31& STR-32)PARK/OPEN SPACE MARKERPARK/OPEN SPACEMARKER (TYP.) SEEDETAIL STR-40 Project:Praire Dunes Rational Storm Sewer Design Tabulation Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Proj #:52840 Plan Date: Frequency Storm (yrs) = 5 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite 300 Comp By:RDR Comp Date: Manning Coefficient = 0.013 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Checked By: Minimum Pipe Size (in.) = 12 952-937-5150 Design Guidelines:Rainfall Data for Twin Cities Metro Area Only Cover Green 2.0 ft Street 3 ft Intensity-Duration-Frequency Data Obtained From MNDOT Slope Preferred 0.5% min Size Lead 12"Main 15" Run 350 ft max Velocity 3-15 fps Outlet 6 fps max Run Description From From To To Area Up Sum Area Time of Pipe Time Selected Sum Intensity Q = Flow Slope Pipe Select Capacity Full Velocity Pipe Prefix #Prefix #Inlet (Acres)Area Conc.(min)(min)Tot Tc "C" CXA CXA (IN/HR) Q = CAI %Dia(in.)Dia(in.) of pipe (fps)Length Up M.H. Dn M.H. Up M.H. Dn M.H. Up M.H. Dn M.H. CB 136 CBMH 135 1.05 1.05 10.00 0.14 10.00 0.40 0.42 0.42 4.86 2.04 0.50 11.09 12 2.52 3.21 27 810.67 810.67 806.67 806.54 2.83 2.97 CBMH 135 STMH 134 0.72 1.77 10.00 0.46 10.14 0.40 0.29 0.71 4.84 3.42 0.50 13.46 15 4.57 3.72 102 810.67 811.62 806.34 805.83 2.90 4.36 STMH 134 CBMH 132 0.00 1.77 10.00 0.47 10.60 0.40 0.00 0.71 4.76 3.37 0.50 13.38 15 4.57 3.72 106 811.62 810.68 805.83 805.30 4.36 3.95 CB 133 CBMH 132 1.25 1.25 10.00 0.14 10.00 0.40 0.50 0.50 4.86 2.43 0.50 11.84 12 2.52 3.21 27 810.68 810.68 806.68 806.55 2.83 2.97 CBMH 132 CBMH 130 0.20 3.22 10.00 0.19 11.07 0.40 0.08 1.29 4.68 6.02 1.00 14.61 15 6.46 5.26 60 810.68 811.01 805.30 804.70 3.95 4.88 CB 138 CBMH 137 0.51 0.51 10.00 1.38 10.00 0.30 0.15 0.15 4.86 0.74 0.50 7.60 12 2.52 3.21 265 807.23 808.15 803.73 802.41 2.33 4.58 CBMH 137 CBMH 130 0.70 1.21 10.00 0.75 11.38 0.30 0.21 0.36 4.63 1.68 0.50 10.31 15 4.57 3.72 168 808.15 811.01 802.41 801.57 4.31 8.01 CBMH 131 CBMH 130 0.72 0.72 10.00 0.52 10.00 0.30 0.22 0.22 4.86 1.05 0.50 8.64 12 2.52 3.21 100 808.29 811.01 804.79 804.29 2.33 5.55 CBMH 130 CBMH 129 0.20 5.35 10.00 0.73 12.13 0.40 0.08 1.95 4.51 8.78 0.20 22.76 24 10.12 3.22 141 811.01 812.30 801.57 801.28 7.20 8.77 CBMH 129 CBMH 128 0.01 5.36 10.00 1.27 12.86 0.40 0.00 1.95 4.40 8.59 0.20 22.58 24 10.12 3.22 246 812.30 808.89 801.28 800.79 8.77 5.85 CBMH 128 CBMH 126 0.36 5.72 10.00 0.46 14.13 0.40 0.14 2.10 4.23 8.87 0.20 22.84 24 10.12 3.22 89 808.89 809.02 800.79 800.61 5.85 6.16 CB 127 CBMH 126 1.26 1.26 10.00 0.14 10.00 0.40 0.50 0.50 4.86 2.45 0.50 11.88 12 2.52 3.21 27 809.02 809.02 805.02 804.89 2.83 2.97 CBMH 126 CBMH 125 0.28 7.26 10.00 0.34 14.59 0.40 0.11 2.71 4.17 11.32 0.20 25.03 27 13.85 3.48 71 809.02 809.52 800.61 800.47 5.89 6.53 CBMH 125 CBMH 123 0.20 7.46 10.00 0.53 14.93 0.40 0.08 2.79 4.13 11.53 0.20 25.21 27 13.85 3.48 110 809.52 810.37 800.47 800.25 6.53 7.60 CB 124 CBMH 123 1.04 1.04 10.00 0.78 10.00 0.30 0.31 0.31 4.86 1.52 0.50 9.92 12 2.52 3.21 151 807.08 810.37 803.58 802.83 2.33 6.38 CBMH 123 STMH 107 0.25 8.75 10.00 0.74 15.46 0.40 0.10 3.20 4.07 13.04 0.20 26.39 27 13.85 3.48 154 810.37 811.57 800.25 799.94 7.60 9.11 CB 122 CBMH 121 1.02 1.02 10.00 0.14 10.00 0.40 0.41 0.41 4.86 1.98 0.50 10.97 12 2.52 3.21 27 811.17 811.17 807.17 807.04 2.83 2.97 CBMH 121 STMH 120 0.35 1.37 10.00 0.35 10.14 0.40 0.14 0.55 4.84 2.65 0.50 12.23 15 4.57 3.72 78 811.17 812.33 806.84 806.45 2.90 4.45 STMH 120 CBMH 117 0.00 1.37 10.00 0.78 10.49 0.40 0.00 0.55 4.78 2.62 0.50 12.17 15 4.57 3.72 175 812.33 810.60 806.45 805.57 4.45 3.59 CB 119 CBMH 117 1.12 1.12 10.00 0.76 10.00 0.30 0.34 0.34 4.86 1.63 0.50 10.20 12 2.52 3.21 146 807.20 810.60 803.70 802.97 2.33 6.46 CB 118 CBMH 117 0.63 0.63 10.00 0.14 10.00 0.40 0.25 0.25 4.86 1.23 0.50 9.16 12 2.52 3.21 27 810.60 810.60 806.60 806.47 2.83 2.97 CBMH 117 CBMH 113 0.56 3.68 10.00 0.61 11.27 0.40 0.22 1.36 4.64 6.32 0.50 16.94 18 7.43 4.20 154 810.60 811.70 802.57 801.80 6.32 8.19 CB 116 CBMH 115 0.80 0.80 10.00 0.79 10.00 0.30 0.24 0.24 4.86 1.17 0.50 8.99 12 2.52 3.21 152 808.80 810.29 805.30 804.54 2.33 4.58 CBMH 115 CBMH 114 0.68 1.48 10.00 0.14 10.79 0.40 0.27 0.51 4.72 2.42 0.40 12.32 15 4.09 3.33 27 810.29 810.29 804.34 804.23 4.51 4.62 CBMH 114 CBMH 113 0.72 2.20 10.00 0.81 10.92 0.40 0.29 0.80 4.70 3.76 0.40 14.54 15 4.09 3.33 161 810.29 811.70 804.23 803.59 4.62 6.67 Invert Elev.Rim Elevation Cover TO POND 3 Proposed Future Existing Temporary CBMH 113 CBMH 111 0.22 6.10 10.00 0.97 11.88 0.40 0.09 2.25 4.55 10.22 0.50 20.29 21 11.20 4.66 272 811.70 811.60 801.60 800.24 8.12 9.38 CB 112 CBMH 111 0.15 0.15 10.00 0.14 10.00 0.40 0.06 0.06 4.86 0.29 0.50 5.35 12 2.52 3.21 27 811.60 811.60 807.60 807.47 2.83 2.97 CBMH 111 STMH 107 0.25 6.50 10.00 0.11 12.86 0.40 0.10 2.41 4.41 10.61 0.50 20.57 21 11.20 4.66 32 811.60 811.57 800.24 800.08 9.38 9.51 CB 110 CBMH 108 0.77 0.77 10.00 0.65 10.00 0.30 0.23 0.23 4.86 1.12 0.50 8.86 12 2.52 3.21 126 808.21 810.32 805.21 804.58 1.83 4.57 CB 109 CBMH 108 0.48 0.48 10.00 0.14 10.00 0.40 0.19 0.19 4.86 0.93 0.50 8.27 12 2.52 3.21 27 810.32 810.32 806.32 806.19 2.83 2.97 CB 108 STM 107 0.35 1.60 10.00 0.66 10.65 0.40 0.14 0.56 4.75 2.67 0.50 12.27 15 4.57 3.72 147 810.32 811.57 804.38 803.65 4.50 6.49 STMH 107 CBMH 104 0.00 16.85 10.00 0.56 16.20 0.40 0.00 6.17 3.99 24.60 0.40 29.41 30 25.94 5.28 176 811.57 810.04 799.94 799.24 8.84 8.01 CB 105 CBMH 104 0.27 0.27 10.00 0.14 10.00 0.40 0.11 0.11 4.86 0.53 0.50 6.67 12 2.52 3.21 27 810.01 810.04 806.01 805.88 2.83 3.00 CB 106 CBMH 104 1.17 1.17 10.00 1.07 10.00 0.30 0.35 0.35 4.86 1.71 0.50 10.37 12 2.52 3.21 205 805.40 810.04 801.90 800.88 2.33 8.00 CBMH 104 CBMH 103 0.20 18.49 10.00 0.87 16.75 0.40 0.08 6.71 3.92 26.34 0.25 32.95 33 26.44 4.45 233 810.04 808.45 799.24 798.66 7.74 6.73 CBMH 103 CBMH 102 0.42 18.91 10.00 0.34 17.62 0.40 0.17 6.88 3.83 26.36 0.25 32.96 33 26.44 4.45 91 808.45 807.62 798.66 798.43 6.73 6.13 CBMH 102 STMH 101 0.98 19.89 10.00 0.58 17.96 0.40 0.39 7.27 3.80 27.61 0.21 34.65 36 30.57 4.32 150 807.62 805.29 798.43 798.11 5.86 3.84 STMH 101 FES 100 0.00 19.89 10.00 0.21 18.54 0.40 0.00 7.27 3.74 27.19 0.21 34.46 36 30.57 4.32 54 805.29 798.00 798.11 798.00 3.84 0.00 CB 201 FES 200 1.01 1.01 10.00 0.20 10.00 0.30 0.30 0.30 4.86 1.47 1.25 8.26 12 3.98 5.07 61 802.26 798.00 798.76 798.00 2.33 0.00 CB 301 STMH 300 0.71 0.71 10.00 0.28 10.00 0.30 0.21 0.21 4.86 1.04 0.50 8.60 12 2.52 3.21 54 804.10 807.66 800.60 800.33 2.33 6.16 STMH 300 EX STMH 270 0.00 0.71 10.00 0.20 10.28 0.30 0.00 0.21 4.81 2.52 0.45 12.25 15 4.33 3.53 43 807.66 810.91 797.25 797.06 8.97 12.41 CBMH 414 CBMH 413 1.08 1.08 10.00 0.14 10.00 0.40 0.43 0.43 4.86 2.10 0.50 11.21 12 2.52 3.21 27 808.90 808.90 804.90 804.77 2.83 2.97 CBMH 413 CBMH 412 0.19 1.27 10.00 0.54 10.14 0.40 0.08 0.51 4.84 2.46 0.35 12.71 15 3.82 3.11 101 808.90 809.76 804.57 804.21 2.90 4.11 CBMH 412 CBMH 410 0.59 1.86 10.00 1.05 10.68 0.40 0.24 0.74 4.74 3.53 0.35 14.56 15 3.82 3.11 197 809.76 807.51 804.21 803.52 4.11 2.55 CBMH 411 CBMH 410 0.95 0.95 10.00 0.94 10.00 0.30 0.29 0.29 4.86 1.39 0.50 9.59 12 2.52 3.21 180 807.14 807.51 803.64 802.74 2.33 3.60 CBMH 410 CBMH 402 0.95 3.76 10.00 0.80 11.74 0.40 0.38 1.41 4.57 6.44 0.40 17.79 18 6.64 3.76 181 807.51 809.60 802.74 802.02 3.06 5.88 CBMH 803 STMH 802 0.84 0.84 10.00 1.61 10.00 0.30 0.25 0.25 4.86 8.11 0.25 21.12 24 11.40 3.63 351 804.00 811.49 799.86 798.97 1.89 10.27 STMH 802 CBMH 801 0.00 0.84 10.00 1.40 11.61 0.30 0.00 0.25 4.59 8.04 0.25 21.05 24 11.40 3.63 304 811.49 804.17 798.97 798.20 10.27 3.72 CBMH 801 FES 800 0.81 1.65 10.00 0.35 13.01 0.30 0.24 0.50 4.38 9.05 0.25 22.01 24 11.40 3.63 77 804.17 798.00 798.20 798.00 3.72 0.00 CBMH 902 STMH 901 0.35 0.35 10.00 1.76 10.00 0.30 0.11 0.11 4.86 1.58 0.25 11.44 21 7.99 3.32 351 804.00 811.49 799.86 798.97 2.16 10.54 STMH 901 FES 900 0.00 0.35 10.00 1.53 11.76 0.30 0.00 0.11 4.57 1.55 0.25 11.35 21 7.99 3.32 304 811.49 804.17 798.97 798.20 10.54 3.99 TO POND 2 TO EXISTING STORM CONNECTION TO TEMP DITCH POND 2 - POND 3 POND 1 - POND 2 813.1804.9R813.1813.7805.5R813.7814.4806.2R814.4814.8806.6R814.8814.6806.4R814.6813.9805.7R813.9812.8804.6R812.8812.9804.7R812.9814.0805.8R814.0815.8807.6LO810.813.6 815.1807.6LO (1)810.8815.8807.6LO810.8813.3SOG813.3812.9SOG812.9812.5SOG812.5812.2SOG812.2814.3 SOG 814.3 814.7 SOG 814.7 814.9 SOG 814.9 814.7 SOG 814.7 814.0 SOG 814.0 813.2 SOG 813.2 813.2 SOG 813.2 813.5 SOG 813.5 814.0 SOG 814.0 814.1SOG814.1813.7SOG813.7813.7SOG813.7815.1SOG815.1815.1SOG815.1815.1SOG815.1814.7SOG814.7814.3SOG814.3813.9SOG813.9813.5SOG813.5812.8SOG812.8812.8SOG812.8813.0SOG813.0813.0SOG813.0813.5SOG813.5813.9SOG813.9814.3SOG814.3814.9SOG814.9814.4 SOG 814.4 813.9 SOG 813.9 813.6 SOG 813.6 813.1 SOG 813.1 813.1 SOG 813.1812.9SOG812.9813.6SOG813.6813.9SOG813.9814.2SOG814.2814.8SOG814.8812.9SOG812.9814.2SOG814.2813.0SOG813.0812.6SOG812.6812.7SOG812.7813.4SOG813.410.6 10.7 10.5 10.0 9.8 8.9 6.7 7.0 6.7 5.7 6.0 5.8 815.0SOG815.0814.1 SOG 814.1 813.7 SOG 813.7 813.3 SOG 813.3 813.0 SOG 813.0 813.0 SOG 813.0 812.8 SOG 812.8 813.0 SOG 813.0 813.7 SOG 813.7 814.3 SOG 814.3 814.6 SOG 814.6 11.9 12.7 13.1 13.3 13.8 13.7 12.2 12.7 12.9 12.2 12.6 13.9 12.412.311.511.89.89.4 10.4 10.8 9.8 11.313.312.7 12.1 11.8 11.4 11.1 12.613.012.211.311.311.311.411.812.212.613.512.511.911.513.113.312.5 12.512.013.313.1 8.8 7.7 9.4 11.511.6 10.211.610.811.712.1 12.5 12.9 13.2 12.912.011.412.311.610.1 12.8 12.410.312.512.4 LP807.7LP808.8LP807.2LP808.2E.O.F.811.0LP808.310.1 12.0 813.1SOG813.18.29.19.110.110.1814.0SOG814.0814.4 SOG 814.4 814.0 SOG 814.0 13.211.812.411.512.112.813.313.212.912.512.111.811.411.88.87.29.511.08.211.810.3 11.4 11.1 11.3 8.7 11.410.4 9 . 8 12.012.3 13.6E.O.F.811.0E.O.F.811.0BASIN 5OUTLET=805.8HWL=806.7EOF=807.8LP807.18.58.312.3814.8SOG814.8814.4SOG814.4814.4SOG814.4814.7SOG814.7813.3SOG813.3813.5 SOG 813.5 813.6 SOG 813.6 814.1 SOG 814.1 812.2SOG812.213.9 13.6 13.2 13.2 13.2 13.9 14.3 14.6 14.6 14.2 13.8 13.4 13.0 12.612.312.3 14.614.013.512.412.312.313.414.114.313.512.6 123456 0123456780+00.00123411.8LP 1+88.30ELEV 811.12HP 4+52.12ELEV 813.01HP811.6HP809.813.512.412 . 4 11.7 12.0 12.4 12.1 HP812.2LP 1+48.03 ELEV 810.80 12.2 12.512.513.0 13.4 13.8 14.2 13.412.612.612.611.613.7 13.4 13.1 12.8 12.4 13.012.712.712.713.113.513.914.214.213.713.113.613.212.812.512.512.312.312.513.213.513.812.80 123456789100+00.00HP 10+73.84LP 4+33.58ELEV 809.28LP807.111.011.211.210.710.19.49.49.68.88.18.910.113.6 12.3 6.06.0 11.113.612.5E.O.F.811.8E.O.F.811.5E.O.F.811.4E.O.F.811.2E.O.F.811.412.9 12.8 808.55808.33808.10809.57808.93809.22810.34810.45810.28810.83811.10810.69811.82811.68811.56811.40811.07810.70810.30809.94809.60E.O.F.809.4809.61810.34810.92810808812814816810808812810808810 810812810 812 814 810 812 812 810812 814810812814810808812814812 812812812812812 81 2 POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOH POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXSTEX-MHRE = 813.61STEX-MHRE = 813.37MHCROPCROPCROPCROPCROPCROPCROPCROPCROPCROPCROPCROPCROPCROPCROPCROPXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXSTO STO STO STO STO STO STO STO STO STO STO STO STOSTOSTOSTOSTO33.0091.00STEX-MHRE = 813.35STEX-MHRE = 813.10STEX-MHRE = 811.29EX-MHRE = 810.29814.03813.89123456789101112131415123456789101112123456789101112131415123456789101234567891022191817161514131211124355OUTLOT B212011OUTLOT A1617161718232412OUTLOT D0.5095AC1.2466AC0.6953AC1.0478AC1.0234AC0.3482AC1.1163AC0.7674AC0.2756AC0.3603AC0.7227AC1.0423AC0.2517AC0.1513AC0.5639AC0.6346AC0.7985AC0.7218AC0.1996AC0.1990AC0.7161AC0.6780AC0.0039AC0.2272ACN:\0052840.00\DWG\0052840C-DRAN.DWG 41PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESMICRO DRAINAGE1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA50'10' OR 5'0'50'100'150'1" = 50'.......... 812.4813.1810.7810.7812.8 804.6 R 812.8 812.3 804.1 R 812.3 811.8 803.6 R 811.8 810.7 802.5 R 810.7 810.7802.5R810.7810.7802.5R810.7810.7802.5R810.7811.1802.9R811.1811.6803.4R811.6812.3804.1R812.3812.7SOG812.7813.3SOG813.3812.7SOG812.7813.2 805.0 R 813.2 812.5804.3R812.5811.9803.7R811.9811.6803.4R811.6812.3804.1R812.3813.1804.9R813.1813.7805.5R813.7813.3SOG813.3812.9SOG812.9812.5SOG812.5812.2SOG812.2814.3 SOG 814.3 814.7 SOG 814.7812.9SOG812.9813.7SOG813.7814.1 SOG 814.1 813.7 SOG 813.710.3INF. CELLOUTLET=798.0BOT=796.0HWL=800.8EOF=804.0ULT. EOF=808.7BERM=802.0POND 3NWL=798.0BOT=788.0HWL=800.8EOF=808.712.212.612.610.2 13.1 8.8 7.7 9.4 10.8 11.2 11.7 11.9 9.98.3 11.0 12.112.110.110.79.48.78.5 8. 3 8.15.89.110.7 5.0 11.610.810.1 4.05.2 5.7 8.1 10.0 11.911.6 11.2 11.2 12.64.69.710.810.6 8.9 7.1 11.55.410.0 11.7 LP807.7LP808.2LP805.48.2811.6803.4R811.6810.7 802.5 R 810.7 10.4 11.28.912.112.89.511.8 10.2 10.3 8.7 9 . 8 4.22.9 3.0 3.83.33.33. 1 5.4 6.29.66.811.3E.O.F.808.7E.O.F.809.4E.O.F.811.2813.6 SOG 813.6 814.1 SOG 814.1 812.2SOG812.2813.0SOG813.012.65678 910111212+52.2211.811.1 11.1 11.4 12.311.811.210.2LP 11+57.90ELEV 807.83LP 6+14.50ELEV 811.2210.21 0 . 2 10.2 10.210.210.611.1 12.5 12.2 12.2 12.2LP804.1HP811.412.4 11.7 12.0 12.4 13.713.113.613.2101112131415161718 19202121+83.12HP 10+73.84ELEV 811.91001234 -0+42.12 10.311.011.2E.O.F.811.2LP802.3E.O.F.810.6E.O.F.804.112.8 13.2 811.10810.69810.64810.38809.68811.55811.82APPROXOFFSITEHPE.O.F.806.5810804806808800796798802804806808790800788792794796798802790800788792794796798802810804806808 812810804806808810 806808812 8 1 0 80 6 806 808 8108088128108 0 0 8107 9 8 8 0 2 8 0 4 8 0 6 808 80 8 81 2 POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOH POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOH POHXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXEX-MHRE = 808.84EX-MHRE = 809.13STEX-MHRE = 808.45STEX-MHRE = 810.91EX-MHRE = 810.01STEX-MHRE = 809.12EX-MHRE = 810.06STEX-MHRE = 810.92STEX-MHRE = 811.13STEX-MHRE = 809.96STEX-MHRE = 808.88XXXXXXXX ST O STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOST O ST O ST O STO STO STO STO STO STO STO STO STO STO STO STO STOSTOSTO STOSTOEX-MHRE = 808.44EX-MHRE = 808.36EX-MHRE = 810.55EX-MHRE = 810.69EX-MHRE = 809.49STEX-MHRE = 812.33STEX-MHRE = 811.17STEX-MHRE = 809.98EX-MHRE = 809.54STEX-MHRE = 810.07810.7911121314151617181920212223242526272829345678101514131211226OUTLOT COUTLOT BOUTLOT D30333132341.0107AC0.7674AC0.3518AC0.4809AC1.1716AC0.7108AC0.9821AC0.4220AC0.1989AC0.2664AC1.2596AC0.2520AC0.2032AC0.2756AC1.0423AC0.2517AC0.1513ACSTN:\0052840.00\DWG\0052840C-DRAN.DWG 42PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESMICRO DRAINAGE1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA50'10' OR 5'0'50'100'150'1" = 50'.......... 812.9804.7LO807.9809.7 801.5 R 809.7 811.4 804.5 LO (2) 807.7 812.0 804.5 LO (1) 807.7 810.1 801.9 R 810.1 811.3 803.1 R 811.3 812.2 804.0 R 812.2 813.6 805.4 R 813.6 813.7 805.5 R 813.7 813.5 805.3 R 813.5 814.2 806.0 LO 809.2 813.9 805.7 LO 808.9812.8804.6LO807.8812.7804.5R812.781 2 . 6 80 4 . 4 R 81 2 . 6 812.2804.0R812.2812.5804.3R812.5811.9 803.7 R 811.9 811.4 803.2 R 811.4 810.3 802.1 R 810.3 810.7 802.5 R 810.7 810.3 802.1 R 810.3 810.8 802.6 R 810.8 811.5 803.3 R 811.5 811.0 802.8 R 811.0 811.5 803.3 R 811.5 812.5 804.3 R 812.5812.4804.2R812.4813.1804.9R813.1814.4807.5LO (2)810.7815.0807.5LO (1)810.7815.7807.5LO810.7 815. 7 807. 5 LO 810. 7 816.0807.8LO811.0816.0807.8LO811.0815.7807.5LO810.7815.7807.5LO810.7813.1804.9R813.110.69.87.36.77.510.26.77.56.36.68.3813.2 805.0 LO 808.2POND 2NWL=800.0BOTTOM=790.0HWL=803.4EOF=805.7ULT. EOF=805.7BERM=806.510.613.24.78.613.41 3 . 5 1 0 . 8 13.4 12.911.7 8.1 8.1 8.8 7.3 10.6 11.4 9.8 9.99.28.08.49.010.58.510.2 8.810.811.011.11 1 . 2 11.1 10.9 11.08 . 8 7.35.6 5.6 10.910.19.68.98.49.010.310.812.212.111.09.98.711.34.74.712.311.810.79.68.45.26.58.710.5LP807.1HP811.2E.O.F.809.77 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 15+23.1401234560+00.006+02.9201234 5 0+00.00 5+51.60 11.4 12.2 12.9 11.9 12.6 13.9 14.515.215.21 5 . 5 15.2 15.2 10.310.210.211.010.59.79.69.711.711.712.11 2 .2HP 4+77 .16ELEV 810 .87 LP 2+73.33 ELEV 809.68 HP 0+33.79 ELEV 811.13 LP 1+32.71 ELEV 809.93 12.3 13.412.7HP 9+53.92ELEV 812.00LP 12+64.12ELEV 808.0811.510.99.213.013.011.710.89.64 5 678910111213HP 8+98.44ELEV 811.82012 3 4 0+00.00 4+19.53HP 3+76.53ELEV 810.73807.34E.O.F.806.0LP807.2E.O.F.809.211.9812.62LP804.2E.O.F.804.69.9HP810.8APPROXOFFSITEEOF=8.75EX HP~8.6EX HP~8.6HP812.0LP804.08007967988028048068088108128148168 0 0 8107 9 8 8 0 2 8 0 4 8 0 6 80 8 810 808 810 806 80 8 812 790 800 810 792 794 796 798 802 804 806 808 812 810 812 808 8128128 0 8XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXEX-MHRE = 810.02EX-MHRE = 810.02EX-MHRE = 810.01STOST O EX-MHRE = 806.84EX-MHRE = 806.96EX-MHRE = 806.02EX-MHRE = 806.32EX-MHRE = 806.15EX-MHRE = 806.32123456789101112123456789123456123456123123662341OUTLOT BOUTLOT A721.0751AC0.8148AC0.1903AC0.9509AC0.9491AC0.5910AC0.8359ACN:\0052840.00\DWG\0052840C-DRAN.DWG 43PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESMICRO DRAINAGE1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA50'10' OR 5'0'50'100'150'1" = 50'.......... 812.3804.8LO (1)808.0812.3804.8LO (1)808.0812.5805.0LO (1)808.2812.8 804.6 LO 807.8 813.0 804.8 LO 808.0 813.0 804.8 LO 808.0 812.7 804.5 LO 807.7 812.0 804.5 LO (1) 807.7 812.5 804.3 R 812.5 812.9 804.7 R 812.9 812.4 804.2 R 812.4 812.1 803.9 R 812.1 811.4 803.2 R 811.4 6.67.06.87.5812.3804.8LO (1)808.07.1POND 1NWL=801.0BOTTOM=791.0HWL=802.8EOF=805.7BERM=806.59.910.611.411.210.310.5 1 0 . 1 9.9 10.3 4.94.94.95.06. 4 5.1 5.7 9.310.110.911.511.010.3E.O.F.805.70123 4 0+00.00 HP 2+97.68ELEV 811.13HP 0+31.51 ELEV 810.21 LP 1 + 1 7 . 2 4 ELEV 8 0 9 . 6 2 11.512.212.512.312.012.011.8 11.7 10.911.611.912.0161718192021222324252627 27+20.30 ELEV 805.57HP 19+43.16ELEV 808.36807.09E.O.F.805.7807.07807.02807.49806.84808.00806.91806.89807.05807.29806.72807.12808.94806.86806.78LP804.580079279479679880280480680880079279479679880280480681080680881281 0 808 812 810810XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXEX-MHRE = 806.33STEX-MHRE = 805.689101112131491011121315161734OUTLOT COUTLOT A0.3591ACN:\0052840.00\DWG\0052840C-DRAN.DWG 44PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESMICRO DRAINAGE1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA50'10' OR 5'0'50'100'150'1" = 50'.......... N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\FINAL LANDSCAPE\0052840C-CVLP01.DWG PRAIRIE DUNES © 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.SHEET INDEXCONSTRUCTION PLANSPRAIRIE DUNESCOTTAGE GROVE, MNPREPARED FOR:PULTE GROUP1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431CONTACT: DEAN LOTTERPHONE: 952-219-9082EMAIL: DEAN.LOTTER@PULTEGROUP.COMSITEVicinity Map(NOT TO SCALE)SHEETSREVISIONDATENO.....................FORFORFINAL LANDSCAPEPREPARED BY:PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840CONTACT: CORY L. MEYERPhone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  CONSTRUCTION PLANSPRAIRIE DUNESCOTTAGE GROVE, MNFORFORFINAL LANDSCAPEINITIAL SUBMITTAL DATE: 12/13/24SHEET: 01 OF 06PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840SHEETNUMBERSHEET TITLE01COVER02OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN03LANDSCAPE PLAN04LANDSCAPE PLAN05LANDSCAPE PLAN & NOTES06LANDSCAPE PLAN & DETAILS 1POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOH POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHSHHHHSSTSSTHHHHSTSSSSSTSSSTSSTCSCSSTSTSTWMHSANSANSANSANSANSANWATWATWATWATWATWATSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOHHCSSTSTSHHSTHHCSCSSCSCSCSSTCSCSCSCSSCSCSCSHHSTSSTSTSSTSTSSS12345678910111213141512345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728291234567891011121314151234567891012345678910123456789101112123456789123456789101112131412345678910111213123123221918171615141312111516171222435566233441OUTLOT BOUTLOT COUTLOT COUTLOT BSTREET 6STREET 8STREET 7 STREET 8STREET 7STREET 7 STREET 9HADLEY AVENUE SOUTHSTREET 1 STREET 6STREET 6STREET 1STREET 1 STREET 3STREET 2STREET 2OUTLOT AOUTLOT DOUTLOT A30333132212011OUTLOT A110TH STREETSOUTH161716171823243412OUTLOT D72105TH STREET SOUTHHADLEY AVENUE SOUTH CODEQTYCOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMESIZEROOTSPACING O.C.MATURE SIZEDECIDUOUS TREES - 200AGG37AUTUMN GOLD MAIDENHAIR TREE / GINKGO BILOBA 'AUTUMN GOLD'2.5" CAL.B&BAS SHOWNH 50` W 30`FFM2FALL FIESTA MAPLE / ACER SACCHARUM 'BAILSTA'2.5" CAL.B&BAS SHOWNH 50`-75` W 50`NPO3NORTHERN PIN OAK / QUERCUS ELLIPSOIDALIS2.5" CAL.B&BAS SHOWNH 50`-60` W 40`-50`REO47RED OAK / QUERCUS RUBRA2.5" CAL.B&BAS SHOWNH 50`-70` W 40`-50`RIB3RIVER BIRCH / BETULA NIGRA2.5" CAL.B&BAS SHOWNH 50`-75` W 50`SGM18SIENNA GLEN MAPLE / ACER X FREEMANII 'SIENNA'2.5" CAL.B&BAS SHOWNH 40`-50` W 35`-40`SKH35SKYLINE HONEY LOCUST / GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS INERMIS 'SKYCOLE'2.5" CAL.B&BAS SHOWNH 50` W 35`-40`SCE40ST CROIX AMERICAN ELM / ULMUS AMERICANA 'ST. CROIX'2.5" CAL.B&BAS SHOWNH 60`-80` W 40`-60`WHO15WHITE OAK / QUERCUS ALBA2.5" CAL.B&BAS SHOWNH 50`-70` W 40`-50`EVERGREEN TREES - 23BHS6BLACK HILLS SPRUCE / PICEA GLAUCA DENSATA6` HT.B&BAS SHOWNH 35`-45` W 20`-25`COF7CONCOLOR FIR / ABIES CONCOLOR6` HT.B&BAS SHOWNH 40`-50` W 15`-30`NOS8NORWAY SPRUCE / PICEA ABIES6` HT.B&BAS SHOWNH 50`-70` W 25`-30`WHP2WHITE PINE / PINUS STROBUS6` HT.B&BAS SHOWNH 50`-80` W 25`-40`ORNAMENTAL TREES - 9ALS2ALLEGHENY SERVICEBERRY / AMELANCHIER LAEVIS6` HT.-CLUMPB&BAS SHOWNH 15`-25` W 15`-25`QUA1QUAKING ASPEN / POPULUS TREMULOIDES2.5" CAL.B&BAS SHOWNH 40`-60` W 20`-30`SSC3SPRING SNOW CRABAPPLE / MALUS X 'SPRING SNOW'2.5" CAL.B&BAS SHOWNH 20` W 20`TCH3THORNLESS COCKSPUR HAWTHORN / CRATAEGUS CRUS-GALLI INERMIS6` HT.-CLUMPB&BAS SHOWNH 15`-20` W 15`-20`N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\FINAL LANDSCAPE\0052840C-FLP01.DWG 0602PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24...© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRAIRIE DUNESOVERALL LANDSCAPEPLAN1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/2412/13/2426971Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com250.000001'50' OR 25'0'250'500'750'1" = 250'..........1.STREET TREE LOCATIONS AND SPACING ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON CONSTRUCTEDDRIVEWAY AND UTILITY LOCATIONS.2.TREES SHALL BE PLANTED 5' FROM BACK OF CURB IN A LOCATION THAT DOES NOT INTERFERE WITHCURBSTOPS OR INDIVIDUAL SEWER & WATER CONNECTIONS.3.NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETEDIN THE IMMEDIATE AREA.4.DECIDUOUS TREES SHOULD BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 5' OFF ANY UTILITY PIPE AND CONIFEROUSTREES SHOULD BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 15' OFF ANY UTILITY PIPE.5.NO TREE SHOULD BE LOCATED WITHIN 10' OF A HYDRANT OR 15' FROM A STREETLIGHT.6.NO TREES SHOULD BE LOCATED WITHIN A STORM POND HWL.7.NO TREES SHOULD BE LOCATED WITHIN STORM POND'S 20-FT ACCESS ROUTE, AND NO CONIFEROUSTREES TREES SHOULD BE LOCATED WITHIN 5' OF THE 20-FT POND ACCESS ROUTE.8.NO DECIDUOUS TREE WITH 5' OF A SIDEWALK OR TRAIL AND NO CONIFEROUS TREES WITHIN 20' OF APROPOSED SIDEWALK OR TRAIL.9.BOULEVARD TREES AND TREES WITHIN CITY OUTLOTS SHOULD CONFORM TO CITY'S APPROVEDSPECIES LIST.10.NO TREE SHOULD BE PLANTED WITH DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT.FINAL PLANTING SCHEDULESHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAPULTE GROUPCITY LANDSCAPE NOTESABBREVIATIONS: B&B = BALLED AND BURLAPPED CAL. = CALIPER HT. = HEIGHTMIN. =MINIMUM O.C. = ON CENTER SP. = SPREAD QTY .= QUANTITY CONT. = CONTAINERNOTE: QUANTITIES ON PLAN SUPERSEDE LIST QUANTITIES IN THE EVENT OF A DISCREPANCY. LARGEOVERSTORYTREESBUFFEREVERGREENTREESOVERSTORYDECIDUOUSSTREET TREES(BY HOME BUILDER)SMALLOVERSTORYTREESFUTUREDECIDUOUS TREES (BY HOME BUILDER)FUTUREEVERGREEN TREES(BY HOME BUILDER)PLANT LEGENDNATIVE SEEDING LEGENDMNDOT WET DITCH (WD)SEED MIX (33-261)TOTAL AREA (1.9 AC)MNDOT SOUTHERNTALLGRASS ROADSIDE(STR)SEED MIX (35-241)TOTAL AREA (2.2 AC)* ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED UNLESS NOTEDOTHERWISE* ALL DISTURBED AREAS IN GRAY CLOUD TRAIL & 103RDSTREET R.O.W. TO BE SEEDED WITH MESIC GENERALROADSIDE SEED MIX (25-141)EXISTING DECIDUOUSTREEEXISTING CONIFEROUSTREELANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS & PROVISIONSTREE PRESERVATION CALCULATIONSCORY L. MEYER POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOH POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHSSSTSSTCSCSWMHSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATSANSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSANSANSANSANCSSTSHHSTHHCSCSSCSCSCSSTCSCSCSCSSCSCSCSS123456789101112131415123456789101112123456789101112131415123456789101234567891022191817161514131211124355OUTLOT BSTREET 8STREET 7 STREET 8STREET 7 STREET 9STREET 6STREET 6212011OUTLOT A1617161718232412OUTLOT DHADLEY AVENUE SOUTH7 - AGG5 - SGM9 - REO9 - SCE9 - SKH9 - WHO10 - AGG9 - SCE7 - REO4 - AGG7 - REON:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\FINAL LANDSCAPE\0052840C-FLP01.DWG 0603PROJECT NUMBER: 0032908.00COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24...© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRAIRIE DUNESLANDSCAPE PLAN1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/2412/13/2426971Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com50.000001'10' OR 5'0'50'100'150'1" = 50'.......... SHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAPULTE GROUPLARGEOVERSTORYTREESBUFFEREVERGREENTREESOVERSTORYDECIDUOUSSTREET TREES(BY HOME BUILDER)SMALLOVERSTORYTREESFUTUREDECIDUOUS TREES (BY HOME BUILDER)FUTUREEVERGREEN TREES(BY HOME BUILDER)PLANT LEGENDNATIVE SEEDING LEGEND* ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED UNLESS NOTEDOTHERWISE* ALL DISTURBED AREAS IN GRAY CLOUD TRAIL & 103RDSTREET R.O.W. TO BE SEEDED WITH MESIC GENERALROADSIDE SEED MIX (25-141)EXISTING DECIDUOUSTREEEXISTING CONIFEROUSTREEMNDOT WET DITCH (WD)SEED MIX (33-261)TOTAL AREA (1.9 AC)MNDOT SOUTHERNTALLGRASS ROADSIDE(STR)SEED MIX (35-241)TOTAL AREA (2.2 AC)CORY L. MEYER POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOH POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOH POHSHHHHSSTSSTHHHHSTSSSSSTSTSTSTSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SA N SA N SA N SAN SANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN WATWATWAT WATWATWATWATWATWATWATWAT WAT WAT WAT WAT WA T W A T W A T WAT WATWATWATWATWATWATSTOST O STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOST O ST O ST O STO STO STO STO STO STO STO STO STO STO STO STOSTOSTO STOSTOHHCSSTCSHHSTSSTSTSSTSS1213141516171819202122232425262728294567812345611312226OUTLOT CSTREET 6STREET 7STREET 7 HADLEY AVENUE SOU T HSTREET 3OUTLOT D3033313234105TH STREET SOUTH7 - REO2 - ALS3 - NOS1 - TCH4 - COF1 - SSC1 - QUA2 - TCH2 - WHP4 - BHS2 - BHS3 - COF1 - SSC9 - WHO7 - SCE5 - SKH1 - SKH1 - SKH1 - SKH1 - SKH6 - SGM7 - SGM6 - AGG9 - SKH9 - SCE1 - NOS2 - NOS2 - NOS1 - NPO1 - SSC2 - RIB1 - RIB2 - FFM1 - NPO1 - NPON:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\FINAL LANDSCAPE\0052840C-FLP01.DWG 0604PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24...© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRAIRIE DUNESLANDSCAPE PLAN1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/2412/13/2426971Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com50.000001'10' OR 5'0'50'100'150'1" = 50'.......... SHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAPULTE GROUPLARGEOVERSTORYTREESBUFFEREVERGREENTREESOVERSTORYDECIDUOUSSTREET TREES(BY HOME BUILDER)SMALLOVERSTORYTREESFUTUREDECIDUOUS TREES (BY HOME BUILDER)FUTUREEVERGREEN TREES(BY HOME BUILDER)PLANT LEGENDNATIVE SEEDING LEGEND* ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED UNLESS NOTEDOTHERWISE* ALL DISTURBED AREAS IN GRAY CLOUD TRAIL & 103RDSTREET R.O.W. TO BE SEEDED WITH MESIC GENERALROADSIDE SEED MIX (25-141)EXISTING DECIDUOUSTREEEXISTING CONIFEROUSTREECORY L. MEYERMNDOT WET DITCH (WD)SEED MIX (33-261)TOTAL AREA (1.9 AC)MNDOT SOUTHERNTALLGRASS ROADSIDE(STR)SEED MIX (35-241)TOTAL AREA (2.2 AC) HHHHSAN WAT STO123456789101112123456789123456123456712312362341OUTLOT BSTREET 1STREET 1 STREET 3STREET 2STREET 2OUTLOT A728 - SCE4 - BHS2 - BHS1 - SSC1 - SKH1 - SKH9 - REO2 - AGG8 - AGG6 - SGM6 - WHON:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\FINAL LANDSCAPE\0052840C-FLP01.DWG 0605PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24...© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRAIRIE DUNESLANDSCAPE PLAN &NOTES1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/2412/13/2426971Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com50.000001'10' OR 5'0'50'100'150'1" = 50'.......... SHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAPULTE GROUP1.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT COMMON GROUND ALLIANCE AT 811 OR CALL811.COM TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALLUNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTS OR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL.2.ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SITE CONDITIONS.3.NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATEAREA.4.ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF ANY BID AND/ORQUOTE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR.5.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THE GUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATEOF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S OR OWNER'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANTMATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONE YEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING.6.ALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE, MINNESOTA-GROWN AND/OR HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADE SHALL ADHERE TO, BUT ISNOT LIMITED BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS:ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC.ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES.ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES.ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY, HEALTHY BRANCHING AND LEAFING.CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER AND A HEIGHT TO WIDTH RATIO OF NO LESS THAN 5:3.7.PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1-2014 OR MOST CURRENT VERSION)REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED.8. PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MNLA & ANSI STANDARD PLANTING PRACTICES.9.PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL-IN MATERIALS IF NECESSARY;TEMPORARY ONLY.10.PRIOR TO PLANTING, FIELD VERIFY THAT THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR IS LOCATED AT THE TOP OF THE BALLED & BURLAPTREE. IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED DOWN TO THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR. WHEN THE BALLED &BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE.11.OPEN TOP OF BURLAP ON BB MATERIALS; REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAK APART PEAT POTS.12.PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY - PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POOR BRANCHING OF EXISTINGAND PROPOSED TREES.13.WRAP ALL SMOOTH-BARKED TREES - FASTEN TOP AND BOTTOM. REMOVE BY APRIL 1ST.14.STAKING OF TREES AS REQUIRED; REPOSITION, PLUMB AND STAKE IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONE YEAR.15.THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING. LANDSCAPECONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THE NEED OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS.16.BACKFILL SOIL AND TOPSOIL TO ADHERE TO MN/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3877 (SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW) AND TOBE EXISTING TOP SOIL FROM SITE FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS LARGER THAN ONE INCH, SUBSOIL DEBRIS, AND LARGE WEEDSUNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. MINIMUM 4" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12" DEPTH TOPSOIL FORTREE, SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS.17.MULCH TO BE AT ALL TREE, SHRUB, PERENNIAL, AND MAINTENANCE AREAS. TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE4" DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO BE USED AROUND ALL PLANTS WITHINTURF AREAS. PERENNIAL AND ORNAMENTAL GRASS BEDS SHALL HAVE 2" DEPTH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. MULCHTO BE FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIAL AND COLORED RED, OR APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE BUFF LIMESTONE, 11/2" TO 3" DIAMETER, AT MINIMUM 3" DEPTH, OR APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE ON COMMERCIAL GRADE FILTERFABRIC, BY TYPAR, OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH NO EXPOSURE. MULCH AND FABRIC TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TOINSTALLATION. MULCH TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE).18.EDGING TO BE COMMERCIAL GRADE VALLEY-VIEW BLACK DIAMOND (OR EQUAL) POLY EDGING OR SPADED EDGE, ASINDICATED. POLY EDGING SHALL BE PLACED WITH SMOOTH CURVES AND STAKED WITH METAL SPIKES NO GREATER THAN4 FOOT ON CENTER WITH BASE OF TOP BEAD AT GRADE, FOR MOWERS TO CUT ABOVE WITHOUT DAMAGE. UTILIZE CURBSAND SIDEWALKS FOR EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE. SPADED EDGE TO PROVIDE V-SHAPED DEPTH AND WIDTH TO CREATESEPARATION BETWEEN MULCH AND GRASS. INDIVIDUAL TREE, SHRUB, OR RAIN-GARDEN BEDS TO BE SPADED EDGE,UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. EDGING TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE).19.ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PARKING LOT ISLANDS TO BE SODDEDWITH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH AROUND ALL TREES AND SHRUBS. SOD TO BE STANDARD MINNESOTA GROWN ANDHARDY BLUEGRASS MIX, FREE OF LAWN WEEDS. ALL TOPSOIL AREAS TO BE RAKED TO REMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSUREDRAINAGE. SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER SHALL BE STAKED. SEED AS SPECIFIED AND PER MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS. IF NOTINDICATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN.20.PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL PLANTED AREAS ON SITE. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN/BUILD BY LANDSCAPECONTRACTOR. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIORTO INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OPERATION MANUALS, AS-BUILT PLANS, ANDNORMAL PROGRAMMING. SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTUP DURING FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION.SYSTEM SHALL HAVE ONE-YEAR WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR. ALL INFORMATION ABOUT INSTALLATION ANDSCHEDULING CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR.21.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PLANT IS FULLY ESTABLISHED ORIRRIGATION SYSTEM IS OPERATIONAL. OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDE WATER FOR CONTRACTOR.22.REPAIR, REPLACE, OR PROVIDE SOD/SEED AS REQUIRED FOR ANY ROADWAY BOULEVARD AREAS ADJACENT TO THE SITEDISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION.23.REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER.24.RAIN GARDEN NOTE: PROVIDE AND INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BLANKET AT RAIN GARDEN AREA SIDE SLOPES AFTER ALLPLANTING HAVE BEEN INSTALLED. BLANKET TO BE ONE SEASON GEOJUTE, MN/DOT CATEGORY 2 (STRAW 1S, WOOD FIBER1S), OR APPROVED EQUAL. BLANKET TO BE OVERLAPPED BY 4" AND ANCHORED BY SOD STAPLES. PLACE BLANKETPERPENDICULAR TO THE SLOPE. TRENCH IN EDGES OF BLANKET AREA TO PREVENT UNDER MINING. PROVIDE SILT FENCEAT TOP OF SLOPE AS NEEDED. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO MATCH OTHER PROJECT PLANTING MULCH. PLACE 4"DEPTH OF MULCH AT ALL PLANTING AND EROSION CONTROL BLANKET AREA (NO FILTER FABRIC). SEE RAIN GARDEN DETAILFOR FURTHER INFORMATION. RAIN GARDEN TO PROVIDE PROPER INFILTRATION AND DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS PERENGINEERS APPROVAL.PLANTING NOTESLARGEOVERSTORYTREESBUFFEREVERGREENTREESOVERSTORYDECIDUOUSSTREET TREES(BY HOME BUILDER)SMALLOVERSTORYTREESFUTUREDECIDUOUS TREES (BY HOME BUILDER)FUTUREEVERGREEN TREES(BY HOME BUILDER)PLANT LEGENDNATIVE SEEDING LEGEND* ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED UNLESS NOTEDOTHERWISE* ALL DISTURBED AREAS IN GRAY CLOUD TRAIL & 103RDSTREET R.O.W. TO BE SEEDED WITH MESIC GENERALROADSIDE SEED MIX (25-141)EXISTING DECIDUOUSTREEEXISTING CONIFEROUSTREEMNDOT WET DITCH (WD)SEED MIX (33-261)TOTAL AREA (1.9 AC)MNDOT SOUTHERNTALLGRASS ROADSIDE(STR)SEED MIX (35-241)TOTAL AREA (2.2 AC)CORY L. MEYER ST678910111213147891011121315161734OUTLOT CSTREET 1STREET 1OUTLOT A8 - SKH8 - REO7 - SCEOUTLOT C110TH STREETSOUTHN:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\FINAL LANDSCAPE\0052840C-FLP01.DWG 0606PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24...© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRAIRIE DUNESLANDSCAPE PLAN &DETAILS1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/2412/13/2426971Common Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com50.000001'10' OR 5'0'50'100'150'1" = 50'.......... SHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAPULTE GROUPLARGEOVERSTORYTREESBUFFEREVERGREENTREESOVERSTORYDECIDUOUSSTREET TREES(BY HOME BUILDER)SMALLOVERSTORYTREESFUTUREDECIDUOUS TREES (BY HOME BUILDER)FUTUREEVERGREEN TREES(BY HOME BUILDER)PLANT LEGENDNATIVE SEEDING LEGEND* ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED UNLESS NOTEDOTHERWISE* ALL DISTURBED AREAS IN GRAY CLOUD TRAIL & 103RDSTREET R.O.W. TO BE SEEDED WITH MESIC GENERALROADSIDE SEED MIX (25-141)EXISTING DECIDUOUSTREEEXISTING CONIFEROUSTREEMNDOT WET DITCH (WD)SEED MIX (33-261)TOTAL AREA (1.9 AC)MNDOT SOUTHERNTALLGRASS ROADSIDE(STR)SEED MIX (35-241)TOTAL AREA (2.2 AC)CITY PLANTING DETAILSCORY L. MEYER POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHCSCSWMHSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN SANSANSAN SAN SANWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWAT WATWATWAT WAT STOSTOSTO STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSAN STO STO33.0091.00 CSCSCSCSCSCSCSCSCSCSCSCSCS12345678910111213141512345678910111213141516171819202122 23 24 25 26 27282912345678910111213141512345678910 12345678910 1234 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 34 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1 2 3 1 2 3 2219181716151413 1211 15 16 17 122 24355 6 6 2 3 3 4 4 1 OUTLOT B OUTLOT C OUTLOT C OUTLOT B OUTLOT A OUTLOT D OUTLOT A30 333132212011OUTLOT A 1617 161718 2324 3412OUTLOT D7 2 012345678 012 34 5 60123 451234567891011121234 012345678910111213141516 ST S S S010123456789101112131415012345MH-5MH-6MH-25MH-19MH-3MH-1MH-12MH-2MH-9MH-7MH-10MH-8MH-11MH-21MH-24MH-20MH-4MH-13MH-18MH-16MH-22MH-17MH-23MH-14MH-15CBMH-129STMH-120CBMH-113STMH-134STMH-802STMH-107CBMH-121CB-122CBMH-130CBMH-111CB-112CBMH-132CB-133CB-136CBMH-135CB-118CBMH-117CBMH-123CBMH-108CB-109CBMH-115CBMH-114STMH-300CBMH-104CB-105CBMH-128CBMH-412CBMH-125CBMH-126CB-127CB-414CBMH-413CB-116CB-131CBMH-103CB-110CBMH-137CBMH-410CBMH-102CB-138CB-119CB-411CB-124CBMH-902CB-106STMH-101CBMH-801STMH-901CB-301OCS-903CBMH-803OCS-804CB-201OCS-701FES-900OCS-703FES-702FES-200FES-100FES-800FES-700STREET 8SEE SHEET 3 & 10STREET 6SEE SHEET 5, 6,12, & 13STREET 9SEE SHEET 7 & 14 STREET 7SEE SHEET 4 & 11STREET 1SEE SHEET 9 & 15STREET 3 SEE SHEET 8 & 15INF. CELLOUTLET=798.0BOT=796.0HWL=800.8EOF=804.0ULT. EOF=808.7BERM=802.0POND 3NWL=798.0BOT=788.0HWL=800.8EOF=808.7POND 2NWL=800.0BOTTOM=790.0HWL=803.4EOF=805.7ULT. EOF=805.7BERM=806.5POND 1NWL=801.0BOTTOM=791.0HWL=802.8EOF=805.7BERM=806.5N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-OAF01.DWG 382PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESOVERALL UTILITY PLAN1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com120'24' OR 12'0'120'240'360'1" = 120'..........SANEXISTINGPROPOSEDWATWATOVERALL UTILITY LEGEND1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ANDNOTIFY THE OWNER OF ANY DIFFERENCES.2.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST. TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALLCONFORM TO THE 2023 ED. OF THE "STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAINAND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION BYTHE CITY ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION OF MINN." AND TO THE "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FORHIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION" MINN. DEPT. OF TRANS., 2020 EDITION AND SUPPLEMENTALSPECIFICATIONS SEPTEMBER 2022. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO FOLLOW ALLPROCEDURES AS OUTLINED BY THE LOCAL AGENCY.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE THE NECESSARY PERMITS FOR ALL WORK OUTSIDE OF THEPROPERTY LIMITS.4.VERIFY EXISTING INVERT LOCATION & ELEVATION PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" FOR FOR UTILITY LOCATIONSPRIOR TO UTILITY INSTALLATION.GENERAL UTILITY NOTESSDTSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERWATER MAINHYDRANTDRAIN TILEFUTURESTORM SEWER CASTING SCHEDULEStructureCasting TypeCity Detail PlateNumberTypeDia.100FES36"w/TRASHGUARDSTO-11101STMH60"R-1642BSTO-3102CBMH60"R-3067-VBSTO-5103CBMH96"R-3067-VSTO-5104CBMH72"R-3067-VSTO-5105CB2'x 3'R-3067-VSTO-5106CB48"R-4342STO-9107STMH72"R-1642BSTO-3108CBMH48"R-3067-VBSTO-5109CB2'x 3'R-3067-VBSTO-5110CB48"R-4342STO-9111CBMH48"R-3067-VBSTO-5112CB2'x 3'R-3067-VBSTO-5113CBMH48"R-3067-VSTO-5114CBMH48"R-3067-VBSTO-5115CBMH48"R-3067-VBSTO-5116CB48"R-4342STO-9117CBMH48"R-3067-VBSTO-5118CB2'x 3'R-3067-VBSTO-5119CB48"R-4342STO-9120STMH48"R-1642BSTO-3121CBMH48"R-3067-VBSTO-5122CB2'x 3'R-3067-VBSTO-5123CBMH60"R-3067-VSTO-5124CB48"R-4342STO-9125CBMH48"R-3067-VSTO-5126CBMH48"R-3067-VBSTO-5127CB2'x 3'R-3067-VBSTO-5128CBMH48"R-3067-VSTO-5129CBMH48"R-3067-VSTO-5130CBMH60"R-3067-VSTO-5131CB48"R-4342STO-9132CBMH48"R-3067-VBSTO-5133CB2'x 3'R-3067-VBSTO-5134STMH60"R-1642BSTO-3135CBMH48"R-3067-VBSTO-5136CB2'x 3'R-3067-VBSTO-5137CBMH48"R-4342STO-9138CB48"R-4342STO-9200FES12"w/TRASHGUARDSTO-11201CB48"R-4342STO-9300STMH48"R-1642BSTO-3301CB48"R-4342STO-9410CBMH60"R-4342STO-9411CB48"R-4342STO-9412CBMH48"R-3067-VSTO-5413CBMH48"R-3067-VBSTO-5414CB2'x 3'R-3067-VBSTO-5700FES24"w/TRASHGUARDSTO-11701OCS48"SEE DETAILSEE SHEET 30702FES24"w/TRASHGUARDSTO-11703OCS48"SEE DETAILSEE SHEET 30800FES24"w/TRASHGUARDSTO-11801CBMH48"R-4342STO-9802STMH48"R-1642BSTO-3803CBMH48"R-4342STO-9804OCS48"SEE DETAILSEE SHEET 30900FES21"w/TRASHGUARDSTO-11901STMH48"R-1642BSTO-3902CBMH48"R-4342STO-9903OCS48"SEE DETAILSEE SHEET 30CONNECT TO EXISTINGSTORM SEWERCONNECT TO EXISTINGSANITARY SEWERCONNECT TO EXISTINGSANITARY SEWERCONNECT TO EXISTINGSANITARY SEWERCONNECT TO EXISTINGWATERMAINCONNECT TO EXISTINGWATERMAINCONNECT TO EXISTINGWATERMAINFUTURE PHASE POHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHCSCSWMHSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSANSAN SANSANSAN SAN SANWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWATWAT WATWATWAT WAT STOSTOSTO STOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSTOSAN STO STO33.0091.00 CSCSCSCSCSCSCSCSCSCSCSCSCS12345678910111213141512345678910111213141516171819202122 23 24 25 26 27282912345678910111213141512345678910 12345678910 1234 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 34 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1 2 3 1 2 3 2219181716151413 1211 15 16 17 122 24355 6 6 2 3 3 4 4 1 OUTLOT B OUTLOT C OUTLOT C OUTLOT B OUTLOT A OUTLOT D OUTLOT A30 333132212011OUTLOT A 1617 161718 2324 3412OUTLOT D7 2 012345678 012 34 5 60123 451234567891011121234 012345678910111213141516 ST S S S010123456789101112131415012345MH-5MH-6MH-25MH-19MH-3MH-1MH-12MH-2MH-9MH-7MH-10MH-8MH-11MH-21MH-24MH-20MH-4MH-13MH-18MH-16MH-22MH-17MH-23MH-14MH-15CBMH-129STMH-120CBMH-113STMH-134STMH-802STMH-107CBMH-121CB-122CBMH-130CBMH-111CB-112CBMH-132CB-133CB-136CBMH-135CB-118CBMH-117CBMH-123CBMH-108CB-109CBMH-115CBMH-114STMH-300CBMH-104CB-105CBMH-128CBMH-412CBMH-125CBMH-126CB-127CB-414CBMH-413CB-116CB-131CBMH-103CB-110CBMH-137CBMH-410CBMH-102CB-138CB-119CB-411CB-124CBMH-902CB-106STMH-101CBMH-801STMH-901CB-301OCS-903CBMH-803OCS-804CB-201OCS-701FES-900OCS-703FES-702FES-200FES-100FES-800FES-700STREET 8SEE SHEET 3 & 10STREET 6SEE SHEET 5, 6,12, & 13STREET 9SEE SHEET 7 & 14 STREET 7SEE SHEET 4 & 11STREET 1SEE SHEET 9 & 15STREET 3 SEE SHEET 8 & 15INF. CELLOUTLET=798.0BOT=796.0HWL=800.8EOF=804.0ULT. EOF=808.7BERM=802.0POND 3NWL=798.0BOT=788.0HWL=800.8EOF=808.7POND 2NWL=800.0BOTTOM=790.0HWL=803.4EOF=805.7ULT. EOF=805.7BERM=806.5POND 1NWL=801.0BOTTOM=791.0HWL=802.8EOF=805.7BERM=806.5N:\0052840.00\DWG\CIVIL\UTIL\0052840C-OAF01.DWG 382PROJECT NUMBER: 0052840COTTAGE GROVE, MN12/13/24CHFCHFSRM© 2024 Westwood Professional Services, Inc.PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNESOVERALL UTILITY PLAN1650 WEST 82ND STREET, SUITE 300BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES12/13/245620812/13/24CHRISTIAN H. FROEMKEPULTE GROUPNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER:VERTICAL SCALE:DATE:PREPARED FOR:OFHORIZONTAL SCALE:DRAWN:CHECKED:DESIGNED:INITIAL ISSUE:REVISIONS:Phone   :hLWeZaWer 'rLYe 6XLWe Fax  0LnneWonNa 01 Toll Free  DATE:LICENSE NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWSOF THE STATE OF MINNESOTACommon Ground AllianceCall 48 Hours before digging:811 or call811.com120'24' OR 12'0'120'240'360'1" = 120'..........SANEXISTINGPROPOSEDWATWATOVERALL UTILITY LEGEND1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ANDNOTIFY THE OWNER OF ANY DIFFERENCES.2.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST. TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALLCONFORM TO THE 2023 ED. OF THE "STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAINAND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION BYTHE CITY ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION OF MINN." AND TO THE "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FORHIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION" MINN. DEPT. OF TRANS., 2020 EDITION AND SUPPLEMENTALSPECIFICATIONS SEPTEMBER 2022. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO FOLLOW ALLPROCEDURES AS OUTLINED BY THE LOCAL AGENCY.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE THE NECESSARY PERMITS FOR ALL WORK OUTSIDE OF THEPROPERTY LIMITS.4.VERIFY EXISTING INVERT LOCATION & ELEVATION PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" FOR FOR UTILITY LOCATIONSPRIOR TO UTILITY INSTALLATION.GENERAL UTILITY NOTESSDTSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERWATER MAINHYDRANTDRAIN TILEFUTURESTORM SEWER CASTING SCHEDULEStructureCasting TypeCity Detail PlateNumberTypeDia.100FES36"w/TRASHGUARDSTO-11101STMH60"R-1642BSTO-3102CBMH60"R-3067-VBSTO-5103CBMH96"R-3067-VSTO-5104CBMH72"R-3067-VSTO-5105CB2'x 3'R-3067-VSTO-5106CB48"R-4342STO-9107STMH72"R-1642BSTO-3108CBMH48"R-3067-VBSTO-5109CB2'x 3'R-3067-VBSTO-5110CB48"R-4342STO-9111CBMH48"R-3067-VBSTO-5112CB2'x 3'R-3067-VBSTO-5113CBMH48"R-3067-VSTO-5114CBMH48"R-3067-VBSTO-5115CBMH48"R-3067-VBSTO-5116CB48"R-4342STO-9117CBMH48"R-3067-VBSTO-5118CB2'x 3'R-3067-VBSTO-5119CB48"R-4342STO-9120STMH48"R-1642BSTO-3121CBMH48"R-3067-VBSTO-5122CB2'x 3'R-3067-VBSTO-5123CBMH60"R-3067-VSTO-5124CB48"R-4342STO-9125CBMH48"R-3067-VSTO-5126CBMH48"R-3067-VBSTO-5127CB2'x 3'R-3067-VBSTO-5128CBMH48"R-3067-VSTO-5129CBMH48"R-3067-VSTO-5130CBMH60"R-3067-VSTO-5131CB48"R-4342STO-9132CBMH48"R-3067-VBSTO-5133CB2'x 3'R-3067-VBSTO-5134STMH60"R-1642BSTO-3135CBMH48"R-3067-VBSTO-5136CB2'x 3'R-3067-VBSTO-5137CBMH48"R-4342STO-9138CB48"R-4342STO-9200FES12"w/TRASHGUARDSTO-11201CB48"R-4342STO-9300STMH48"R-1642BSTO-3301CB48"R-4342STO-9410CBMH60"R-4342STO-9411CB48"R-4342STO-9412CBMH48"R-3067-VSTO-5413CBMH48"R-3067-VBSTO-5414CB2'x 3'R-3067-VBSTO-5700FES24"w/TRASHGUARDSTO-11701OCS48"SEE DETAILSEE SHEET 30702FES24"w/TRASHGUARDSTO-11703OCS48"SEE DETAILSEE SHEET 30800FES24"w/TRASHGUARDSTO-11801CBMH48"R-4342STO-9802STMH48"R-1642BSTO-3803CBMH48"R-4342STO-9804OCS48"SEE DETAILSEE SHEET 30900FES21"w/TRASHGUARDSTO-11901STMH48"R-1642BSTO-3902CBMH48"R-4342STO-9903OCS48"SEE DETAILSEE SHEET 30CONNECT TO EXISTINGSTORM SEWERCONNECT TO EXISTINGSANITARY SEWERCONNECT TO EXISTINGSANITARY SEWERCONNECT TO EXISTINGSANITARY SEWERCONNECT TO EXISTINGWATERMAINCONNECT TO EXISTINGWATERMAINCONNECT TO EXISTINGWATERMAINFUTURE PHASE Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 1000, Minneapolis MN 55402-2309 January 23, 2025 File: 193807205 Crystal Raleigh, PE Assistant City Engineer 12800 Ravine Parkway South Cottage Grove, Minnesota 55016 Reference: Prairie Dunes (December 13, 2024 Submittal) Dear Crystal, Below are review comments for the proposed Prairie Dunes based on the December 13, 2024 resubmittal: General Comments: 1. Include street names for reference on the vicinity maps. 2. Submit project specifications for review, include geotechnical report. 3. Submit updated quantities and estimated unit prices. 4. Refer to project as Prairie Dunes rather than Preserve At Prairie Dunes. 5. Remove “NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION” notes from plans. Plat Comments: 6. All driveways have been shown, they shall meet the required 6’ side yard setback and not encroach within the side yard easement. Please verify that lot 24 block 2, lot 4 block 6, and lot 6 block 6 meet this requirement. 7. Review and revise D&U easements encompassing pipes to ensure they are twice as wide as the pipe is deep. Grading Plan Comments: 8. Remove “AND LANDSCAPE” from cover sheet. 9. Pond 1 is significantly larger than needed and is a borrow area for the site. It could remain as a City outlot and will not be counted toward park dedication. Borrow area to include smooth transition to flat bottom. 10. What is proposed between lot 22 and lot 23 of block 2, a dark line/legend is shown? Remove line if not needed. 11. Verify where the Graymont Village storm sewer is located along the east side of the project. The existing and future storm sewer should be shown for reference. 12. Remove silt fence along the east side of Hadley Avenue as this is not needed. 13. Include 2025 City detail plates. Only include detail plates pertaining to grading and erosion control. 14. Existing Conditions: The gravel driveway shown does not exist, remove existing gravel driveway. 15. Does the well shown in the northeast corner of the site exist? If so, provide documentation of well and records of capping. If not, provide notes that the well shall be sealed and documentation provided to the City for record keeping. 16. Existing trees along the north side of the development adjacent to the City park area to be removed, update and label on tree removal plan. 17. Remove existing fence around perimeter of development except along the DNR property to the west. DNR fence to remain in place. 18. Show location of rock construction entrances, legend shown in plans. 19. Reduce depth of ponds from 10 feet to 8 feet from bottom to NWL. 20. Reference the ponds will be sealed with a clay liner and provide details. 21. Remove note for BASIN 5 within the City park. 22. Update existing utilities within City park, existing water main is not accurately shown. CAD information will be provided. 23. Storm structure CB-301 is not needed as there is less than 4 lots of drainage in this area. Yard drainage to be directed to Pond 3. 24. Street 2 includes a segment of street less than 0.75% slope. Street slope to be a minimum of 0.75%. 25. Provide information and details pertaining to temporary ditching to Pond 2 for storm sewer outlet. 26. Will topsoil and aggregate backfill be salvaged onsite? If so, indicate this on the plans and provide notes. Provide stockpile locations in plans, including appropriate erosion control measures. 27. Pond access routes shall be clearly identified on all grading plan sheets. Street & Utility Plan Comments: 28. Project name should reference Prairie Dunes rather than Preserve at Prairie Dunes on all sheets. 29. Insert 2025 City detail plates. Add City detail plates for SAN-4 (Inside Drop MH), SER- 9 (Service Riser Detail), STO-1 (Storm Sewer MH), STO-2 (Storm Sewer Junction MH), WAT-4 (Butterfly Valve). City detail plates STO-14, STR-16, and STR-27 can be removed. 30. General Utility Notes: Hydrant flags to be fiberglass, avoid deep valves (remove note), all drop manholes to include an inner spray liner and constructed with inside drops, 2025 vs 2024 reference to specifications. 31. Correct compass direction for Street 6 on sheet 13 and Street 1 on sheet 15. 32. Update utilities plan to show existing utilities within City park. 33. Ensure turning radius along trails is sufficient for pickup truck with plow (minimum radius of 15 feet to inside of trail). Add radius at trail connection near roundabout. 34. Check Trail 1 for steep slope and horizontal curve between STA 12+62 and STA 13+60 to ensure it meets recommendations in the Bike Manual. 35. Include sheets for temporary and permanent erosion control. 36. See attached overall utility plan sheet for proposed gate valve and butterfly valve locations. 37. Storm sewer schedule: Gray scale structures to be installed in future phase. 38. Show and label all water main bends (Street 8, Street 6, Street 3, Street 1, etc.). 39. Add sanitary sewer wyes and risers along Street 1 for future lot 1 block 1 and future lot 1 block 2. Service pipes to the lots will be extended in the next phase. 40. Maintain 10’ of separation between water main and sanitary sewer even if water main bends are needed (north end of Street 6, etc.). 41. Deep water main is shown in areas. Please review and remove as much as possible (between: MH-9 and MH-8, MH-8 and MH-13, MH-8 and MH-16, north of MH-22, north and south ends of looped water main between Street 7 and Street 3, etc.)? Can the pipe be deflected in areas to avoid water main offsets without the use of bends? 42. A water main offset is proposed at the cul-de-sac of Street 7, adjust location of services so they do not conflict with the water main offset. 43. The existing water main in Hadley Avenue is 12” DIP. 12” DIP will be required to be extended south within Street 1, an oversizing credit will be provided to the developer. 44. All existing hydrants and 6” valves that are to be removed for the water main connections can be salvaged and reused onsite. Indicate location of salvaged hydrants and 6” valves to be installed on plans. 45. Hydrants and 6” valves should be placed perpendicular to back of curb (west end of Street 3, etc.). 46. At the south end of Street 1 (phase line), a sanitary sewer manhole and temporary hydrant should be placed. Also consider installing the sewer and water services to the first lot on either side of the roadway south of the phase boundary. 47. Place a hydrant and 6” valve at the water main low point for the looped water main between Street 7 and Street 3. 48. SDR 26 sewer pipe to be used when depths are greater than 18’ in depth (between: MH-7 and MH-8, south of MH-22, etc.). 49. Is there any reason the sanitary sewer pipe between MH-23 and MH-24 cannot be shallower? Separate inside drop elevations are acceptable. 50. Re-route the sanitary sewer service from lot 1 block 7 to Street 1 to the south side of MH-22 since the sanitary sewer is shallower. 51. Storm sewer structures should be reviewed to see if they can be positioned at proposed lot lines wherever possible (CB-136, CBMH-113, CB-105, CB-109, CBMH- 115, etc.). 52. Storm sewer pipe between CBMH-104 and CBMH-111 is too far behind curb and into the boulevard. Add storm sewer structure to maintain storm sewer pipe along curb. 53. CBMH-102 must be constructed with a sump, include within the storm sewer schedule. Review and revise as necessary to ensure a sump structure is proposed as the last roadway-accessible structure prior to a basin. 54. Remove sump for CBMH-123. 55. Cul-de-sacs for Street 3 and Street 7 show a slight curve within the curb that doesn’t appear to be necessary. Remove slight curves in the curb and ensure cul- de-sac and right-of-way radii meet City requirements. 56. The sidewalk crossing at the intersection of Street 7 and Street 8 needs to be adjusted for maintenance and snow removal purposes. The sidewalk on the south side of the roadway needs to be constructed straight north into the back of curb. 57. Remove old proposed driveway locations are still shown along Hadley Avenue (lots 1-12 block 5). 58. Move the proposed driveway to south side of lot 7 block 5 to ensure services do not fall under the bituminous. 59. The trail proposed to extend onto the City park site should match the current park design to date. CAD information to be provided. 60. Intersection details: Show truncated domes and landing areas in intersection details. 61. Remove unnecessary lines within the intersection details. 62. Include pedestrian ramps at the intersection of Street 1 and Street 3. 63. If topsoil and aggregate backfill will be salvaged onsite indicate this on the plans, notes, and typical section. 64. See attached street lighting plan for proposed lighting locations. 65. The lighting plan should include location of service cabinet, cabinet detail, wiring and conduit locations, and handhole locations. Include 2025 detail plates. 66. Signage Plan: Include stop signs at the intersection of Street 6 and Street 7 only for the N/S legs. Include 2025 detail plates. 67. See attached street signage plan for proposed locations for park and open space markers. Landscape Plan Comments: 68. Under the native seeding legend there is reference to “Gray Cloud Trail and 103rd Street ROW”, remove if not needed. 69. Remove proposed trees in boulevard areas. 70. Remove trees along the north side of the project, adjacent to the City park area. 71. Update landscaping detail plates with 2025 detail plates. Stormwater Requirements: 72. In the HydroCAD model, Subcatchment 5S area does not match what is shown in the proposed drainage map. 73. In the HydroCAD model, Pond 3 shows the OCS weir wall as a broad-crested weir. Weir walls should be modeled as a sharp-crest weir. 74. Clarify if pretreatment, such as a sump, will be provided for the infiltration basin and clearly indicate this on the plans. 75. According to the Stormwater Manual, by default, P8 assumes far too great removal efficiencies of dissolved and small particle phosphorus. Please update the P0% and P10% removal rates. a. Recommendations and guidance for utilizing P8 to meet TMDL permit requirements - Minnesota Stormwater Manual Regards, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. David R. Sanocki, PE Eric Vidden, EIT Phone: 651-712-2124 Phone: 612-712-2141 dave.sanocki@stantec.com eric.vidden@stantec.com 1 City Council Action Request 8.A. Meeting Date 2/5/2025 Department Finance Agenda Category Action Item Title Approve Disbursements Staff Recommendation Approve disbursements from 01-17-2025 through 01-30-2025 in the amount of $2,511,892.70. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. Expense Approval Report 02-05-2025 Council Meeting 2. Payroll Check Register 02-05-25 Council Meeting 3. UB Check Register 02-05-25 Council Meeting 1/30/2025 8:48:38 AM Page 1 of 27 Expense Approval Report Cottage Grove By Vendor Name Payment Dates 1/17/2025 - 1/30/2025 AmountPayable NumberPayment DatePayment NumberVendor Name Description (Item) Vendor: VEN31355 - ACE TRAILER SALES 3.9545805401/22/2025226473ACE TRAILER SALES CAP FOR 50MM NEVER LUBE AXLE Vendor VEN31355 - ACE TRAILER SALES Total:3.95 Vendor: VEN01187 - ADVANCED GRAPHIX INC 25.5021558401/22/2025226474ADVANCED GRAPHIX INC INSURANCE CLAIM#CA403506- 2159/38536 Vendor VEN01187 - ADVANCED GRAPHIX INC Total:25.50 Vendor: VEN35015 - ALEC KOERNER 19.002025012201/29/2025226563ALEC KOERNER A. KOERNER - LUNCH REIMBURSEMENT - GREEN EXPO Vendor VEN35015 - ALEC KOERNER Total:19.00 Vendor: VEN32677 - ALL AMERICAN ICE, LLC 153.22613301/29/2025226564ALL AMERICAN ICE, LLC PRO PEG GOAL PEGS 409.76614901/29/2025226564ALL AMERICAN ICE, LLC PRO PEG GOAL PEGS Vendor VEN32677 - ALL AMERICAN ICE, LLC Total:562.98 Vendor: VEN37660 - ALLY PLUMBING 69.002025011301/22/2025226508ALLY PLUMBING REFUND BUILDING PERMIT #2024-031262 Vendor VEN37660 - ALLY PLUMBING Total:69.00 Vendor: VEN33229 - AMAZON FULFILLMENT SERVICES, INC. 138.9511PX-YHD1-DVKD01/22/202519952AMAZON FULFILLMENT SERVI…RECYLING CANS- E&UB 149.991LGP-X7QD-FK1401/29/202520008AMAZON FULFILLMENT SERVI…SHARK UPRIGHT VACUUM CLEANER 90.6011H9-PKLK-VL1901/22/202519952AMAZON FULFILLMENT SERVI…CASE OF CLEANING CLOTHS- SHOP 186.321YWF-4P6T-QM3X01/22/202519952AMAZON FULFILLMENT SERVI…METER BATT KITS-WATER 52.2611DQ-NWML-1MK701/22/202519952AMAZON FULFILLMENT SERVI…RV HAND RAIL/GRAB RAIL/TRAILER DOOR HANDLE 633.4511DQ-NWML-H9F401/22/202519952AMAZON FULFILLMENT SERVI…TRASH CANS FOR U&EB 178.3514VY-XD1L-G73L01/22/202519952AMAZON FULFILLMENT SERVI…3- PORTABLE WIRELESS BLUETOOTH BARCODE SCANNERS 130.261JPH-VC9W-HKXD01/22/202519952AMAZON FULFILLMENT SERVI…FIREARMS SUPPLIES 64.781KYM-XKCC-HP3C01/22/202519952AMAZON FULFILLMENT SERVI…LED LIGHT BAR -SHOP 209.971QF3-KV6F-Q4MG01/29/202520008AMAZON FULFILLMENT SERVI…LAPTOP MOUNT FOR SQUAD CAR 41.571QJ7-RVJR-RDGM01/22/202519952AMAZON FULFILLMENT SERVI…FILE HOLDERS/HANGING FRAMES - U&EB 34.651KLF-3XFJ-1PDP01/22/202519952AMAZON FULFILLMENT SERVI…2 YR SPIRAL BOUND PLANNER 161.551NCR-6V91-3NCH01/29/202520008AMAZON FULFILLMENT SERVI…CHAIR FOR NEW MECHANIC - FLEET 257.851QQ4-97F9-1NXT01/22/202519952AMAZON FULFILLMENT SERVI…TRASH CANS - U & EB 45.911YJL-6FDG-DWVW01/29/202520008AMAZON FULFILLMENT SERVI…SOLENOID/SENSOR - PART FOR CLUBHOUSE 18.951H4L-QLDT-PJT301/29/202520008AMAZON FULFILLMENT SERVI…WHITEBOARD TAPE 43.981RRP-6414-P4TL01/29/202520008AMAZON FULFILLMENT SERVI…SAFETY EARMUFFS-FLEET 64.781V3K-DCR9-P9P301/29/202520008AMAZON FULFILLMENT SERVI…LED LIGHT BAR FOR TRUCK- FLEET 81.0511CF-LKG1-HMVP01/29/202520008AMAZON FULFILLMENT SERVI…COFFEE POT/FILTERS - UEB 159.251MH9-CFG3-NGX901/29/202520008AMAZON FULFILLMENT SERVI…FLUSHMATE TOILET - FM 167.301QMM-DCMR-MHY601/29/202520008AMAZON FULFILLMENT SERVI…DROP CEILING VENT - FM 38.851YKG-TX11-J3WF01/29/202520008AMAZON FULFILLMENT SERVI…ROD KITS - FIRE OP SUPPLY - PUBLIC EDUCATION ITEMS Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 1/17/2025 - 1/30/2025 1/30/2025 8:48:38 AM Page 2 of 27 AmountPayable NumberPayment DatePayment NumberVendor Name Description (Item) 30.101GFR-GY3X-QJWT01/29/202520008AMAZON FULFILLMENT SERVI…FIREARMS SUPPLIES - GUN OIL 47.671JMN-HK44-1G3P01/29/202520008AMAZON FULFILLMENT SERVI…KEYBOARD CASE FOR IPAD - EMS 64.171YJL-6FDG-4W7P01/29/202520008AMAZON FULFILLMENT SERVI…BADGE HOLDERS/PENS - UEB Vendor VEN33229 - AMAZON FULFILLMENT SERVICES, INC. Total:3,092.56 Vendor: VEN31224 - AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF COLUMBUS 112.36INV02589901/22/202519953AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSU…1/9/2025 BIWEEKLY PAYROLL- 12/16/24-12/29/24 112.36INV02591201/22/202519953AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSU…1/23/2025 BIWEEKLY PAYROLL- 12/30/2024-1/12/2025 Vendor VEN31224 - AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF COLUMBUS Total:224.72 Vendor: VEN01027 - ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 603.5012582301/29/2025226565ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER IMPRESS 2 3100T 603.5012582301/29/2025226565ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER IMPRESS 2 3100T 423.5512598101/29/2025226565ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER APX RSM W/EAR JACK Vendor VEN01027 - ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER Total:1,630.55 Vendor: VEN37665 - ANGIE SCHAFFER 75.002025010801/22/2025226509ANGIE SCHAFFER PHOTO CONTEST WINNER Vendor VEN37665 - ANGIE SCHAFFER Total:75.00 Vendor: VEN31765 - ANIMAL HUMANE SOCIETY 2,112.004237001/29/2025226543ANIMAL HUMANE SOCIETY 4TH QTR IMPOUND FEES - 2024 Vendor VEN31765 - ANIMAL HUMANE SOCIETY Total:2,112.00 Vendor: VEN35722 - ASHLEY THOMPSON 75.002025010801/22/2025226510ASHLEY THOMPSON PHOTO CONTEST WINNER Vendor VEN35722 - ASHLEY THOMPSON Total:75.00 Vendor: VEN01017 - ASPEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY 1,673.66PSO084800-101/22/2025226475ASPEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY AUGER MOTOR - STOCK 2,494.74SWO044059-101/22/2025226475ASPEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY AERIAL INSPECTION & DIELECTRIC - 6009/38695 Vendor VEN01017 - ASPEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY Total:4,168.40 Vendor: VEN29293 - ASPEN MILLS 174.8934704701/29/2025226566ASPEN MILLS EMS UNIFORMS FOR PARAMEDIC SCHOOL Vendor VEN29293 - ASPEN MILLS Total:174.89 Vendor: VEN01013 - AT&T 95.0054330801/22/2025226511AT&T CG24038150 TOWER DUMP FOR CASE Vendor VEN01013 - AT&T Total:95.00 Vendor: VEN35831 - AURORA STRATEGIC ADVISORS INC 3,833.3324-CG-1201/29/2025226544AURORA STRATEGIC ADVISOR…FEDERAL LOBBY SERVICES - DEC 2024 Vendor VEN35831 - AURORA STRATEGIC ADVISORS INC Total:3,833.33 Vendor: VEN20106 - AXON ENTERPRISE, INC. 41,858.16INUS31275701/29/202520009AXON ENTERPRISE, INC.BUNDLE - TASER 7 CERTIFICATION Vendor VEN20106 - AXON ENTERPRISE, INC. Total:41,858.16 Vendor: VEN36961 - BARCO PRODUCTS LLC 3,889.97INVRCO3070501/29/2025226567BARCO PRODUCTS LLC OUTDOOR BACKLESS BENCH- PARKS Vendor VEN36961 - BARCO PRODUCTS LLC Total:3,889.97 Vendor: VEN02295 - BARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN, LTD 170.0029196801/29/2025226545BARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN, LTD EMPLOYMENT LAW COUNSELING - GENERAL ALBOR Vendor VEN02295 - BARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN, LTD Total:170.00 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 1/17/2025 - 1/30/2025 1/30/2025 8:48:38 AM Page 3 of 27 AmountPayable NumberPayment DatePayment NumberVendor Name Description (Item) Vendor: VEN29278 - BAUER BUILT TIRE 1,964.4018030959801/22/2025226476BAUER BUILT TIRE PXDS2RECON TIRES - STOCK Vendor VEN29278 - BAUER BUILT TIRE Total:1,964.40 Vendor: VEN33625 - BAYCOM, INC 1,785.00EQUIPINV_05319901/22/202519954BAYCOM, INC RFID Card Readers for MDC redeployment 154.00EQUIPINV_05336801/29/202520010BAYCOM, INC 1 YR NETCLOUD RENEWAL - WELL HOUSES Vendor VEN33625 - BAYCOM, INC Total:1,939.00 Vendor: VEN32569 - BERTELSON BROTHERS, INC 466.12M-65575312/31/202401/22/202519987BERTELSON BROTHERS, INC DECEMBER OFFICE SUPPLIES 308.96M-65575312/31/202401/22/202519987BERTELSON BROTHERS, INC DECEMBER OFFICE SUPPLIES 245.66M-65575312/31/202401/22/202519987BERTELSON BROTHERS, INC DECEMBER OFFICE SUPPLIES Vendor VEN32569 - BERTELSON BROTHERS, INC Total:1,020.74 Vendor: VEN32557 - BG AUTOMOTIVE INC 168.00PI005014601/22/202519955BG AUTOMOTIVE INC LUBRICANT SPRAY - STOCK Vendor VEN32557 - BG AUTOMOTIVE INC Total:168.00 Vendor: VEN02288 - BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC 74.988561953901/29/202520011BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC EMS SUPPLIES 924.268561954001/29/202520011BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC EMS SUPPLIES 489.258562304201/29/202520011BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC EMS SUPPLIES 108.088562490801/29/202520011BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC EMS SUPPLIES 325.858562651001/29/202520011BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC EMS SUPPLIES Vendor VEN02288 - BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC Total:1,922.42 Vendor: VEN36571 - BRAD GOULET 132.002025012301/29/2025226568BRAD GOULET PER DIEM- MN RURAL WATER TRAINING- B.GOULET Vendor VEN36571 - BRAD GOULET Total:132.00 Vendor: VEN37670 - BRIAN ALEMENTI 2,500.002025012101/29/2025226569BRIAN ALEMENTI SPEAKING ENGAGEMENT - 2/5/2025 Vendor VEN37670 - BRIAN ALEMENTI Total:2,500.00 Vendor: VEN34336 - BRINDLEE MOUNTAIN FIRE APPARATUS, LLC 2,500.002746201/29/2025226546BRINDLEE MOUNTAIN FIRE AP…FREIGHTLINER COMMERCIAL PUMPER Vendor VEN34336 - BRINDLEE MOUNTAIN FIRE APPARATUS, LLC Total:2,500.00 Vendor: VEN02028 - BROADCAST MUSIC INC 446.005719375501/29/2025226570BROADCAST MUSIC INC 2025 MUSIC LICENSE FEE Vendor VEN02028 - BROADCAST MUSIC INC Total:446.00 Vendor: VEN33107 - BURGGRAF'S ACE HARDWARE OF COTTAGE GROVE CO. 8.91648901/22/2025226477BURGGRAF'S ACE HARDWARE…SPLIT RINGS - WATER 11.97649001/22/2025226477BURGGRAF'S ACE HARDWARE…KEYS - WATER 7.99649101/22/2025226477BURGGRAF'S ACE HARDWARE…VAC BELT -FM 233.75650001/29/2025226571BURGGRAF'S ACE HARDWARE…PADLOCKS/TIMER -UEB 42.00650201/29/2025226571BURGGRAF'S ACE HARDWARE…REPLACEMENT MUG FROM FIRE - STREETS Vendor VEN33107 - BURGGRAF'S ACE HARDWARE OF COTTAGE GROVE CO. Total:304.62 Vendor: VEN03922 - CENTERPOINT ENERGY 926.358000015730-7 JAN 2501/22/2025226512CENTERPOINT ENERGY FIRE #3 GAS USAGE 127.858000015730-7 JAN 2501/22/2025226512CENTERPOINT ENERGY LAMAR PARK BLDG GAS USAGE 196.828000015730-7 JAN 2501/22/2025226512CENTERPOINT ENERGY WARMING HOUSE GAS USAGE 303.328000015730-7 JAN 2501/22/2025226512CENTERPOINT ENERGY PW STORAGE BLDG GA… 387.598000015730-7 JAN 2501/22/2025226512CENTERPOINT ENERGY RIVER OAKS PRO SHOP GAS USAGE 365.478000015730-7 JAN 2501/22/2025226512CENTERPOINT ENERGY RIVER OAKS MAINT BLDG GAS USAGE 1,365.608000015730-7 JAN 2501/22/2025226512CENTERPOINT ENERGY CLUBHOUSE GAS USAGE Vendor VEN03922 - CENTERPOINT ENERGY Total:3,673.00 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 1/17/2025 - 1/30/2025 1/30/2025 8:48:38 AM Page 4 of 27 AmountPayable NumberPayment DatePayment NumberVendor Name Description (Item) Vendor: VEN03059 - CENTURY COLLEGE 210.00CI000000576001/29/202520012CENTURY COLLEGE EMS EDUCATION - BLS PROVIDER CARDS Vendor VEN03059 - CENTURY COLLEGE Total:210.00 Vendor: VEN33373 - CHELSEY FLORES 32.002025011001/29/2025226572CHELSEY FLORES EMSRB RE-CERTIFICATION PAYMENT Vendor VEN33373 - CHELSEY FLORES Total:32.00 Vendor: VEN33565 - CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 371.35421689453001/22/202519956CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 MAT SERVICE - HERO CENTER 70.12421737060301/22/202519956CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 RIVER OAKS UNIFORM SVC 91.07421764209001/29/202520013CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 MAT SERVICE - CENTRAL FIRE 71.89421812298501/29/202520013CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 RIVER OAKS UNIFORM SVC Vendor VEN33565 - CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 Total:604.43 Vendor: VEN03907 - CITY OF ST PAUL 1,085.66IN6135001/29/2025226573CITY OF ST PAUL MATERIAL COSTS TO REPAIR SIGNAL HYDE & 80TH 1,560.00IN6135101/29/2025226573CITY OF ST PAUL HYDE & 80TH LABOR & EQUIP REPAIRS Vendor VEN03907 - CITY OF ST PAUL Total:2,645.66 Vendor: VEN03057 - CITY OF WOODBURY 16,231.5057901/22/2025226478CITY OF WOODBURY 2025 WASHINGTON COUNTY SWAT TRAINING - 9 MEMBERS 5,500.0058201/22/2025226478CITY OF WOODBURY GRAY KEY SERVICES Vendor VEN03057 - CITY OF WOODBURY Total:21,731.50 Vendor: VEN32389 - COMCAST 282.868772 10 789 0002365 JAN 2501/22/2025226479COMCAST ICE ARENA CABLE SVC- 1/14/25-2/13/25 1,016.178772 10 789 0002365 JAN 2501/22/2025226479COMCAST CLUBHOUSE CABLE SVC- 1/14/25-2/13/25 53.958772 10 789 0002365 JAN 2501/22/2025226479COMCAST FIRE CABLE SVC- 1/14/25- 2/13/25 8,994.2623117193101/29/2025226574COMCAST CENTRAL FIRE FIBER ACCT#939010329-1/15/25- 2/14/25 109.298772 10 576 0347241 JAN 2501/29/2025226574COMCAST CENTRAL FIRE #8772105760347241- 1/13/25- 2/12/25 Vendor VEN32389 - COMCAST Total:10,456.53 Vendor: VEN03943 - COTTAGE GROVE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 388.3629272501/29/2025226575COTTAGE GROVE ANIMAL HO…VACCINE BOOSERS - SCOUT Vendor VEN03943 - COTTAGE GROVE ANIMAL HOSPITAL Total:388.36 Vendor: VEN03012 - CUB FOODS 18.9516130609839201/22/2025226480CUB FOODS FOOD FOR CLUBHOUSE Vendor VEN03012 - CUB FOODS Total:18.95 Vendor: VEN03305 - CUMMINS INC. 4,400.67E4-25018879101/22/2025226481CUMMINS INC.REPLACED ECM MODULE - 3126/38653 Vendor VEN03305 - CUMMINS INC. Total:4,400.67 Vendor: VEN03051 - CUSHMAN MOTOR COMPANY INC 193.8521110101/22/2025226482CUSHMAN MOTOR COMPANY …THROTTLE CABLE - 8409/38686 Vendor VEN03051 - CUSHMAN MOTOR COMPANY INC Total:193.85 Vendor: VEN34463 - DARTS 6,250.0010640-11101/22/2025226513DARTS TRANSPORTATION LOOP - 10/01/24-12/31/24 Vendor VEN34463 - DARTS Total:6,250.00 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 1/17/2025 - 1/30/2025 1/30/2025 8:48:38 AM Page 5 of 27 AmountPayable NumberPayment DatePayment NumberVendor Name Description (Item) Vendor: VEN37594 - DIVERSE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES LLC 13,868.952024123101/29/2025226626DIVERSE CONSTRUCTION SERV…PYMT 3 & FINAL - HERO ROOF REPAIR Vendor VEN37594 - DIVERSE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES LLC Total:13,868.95 Vendor: VEN37661 - DOROTHY YOUNG 1,374.042025011001/22/2025226514DOROTHY YOUNG REFUND FOR SERVICES Vendor VEN37661 - DOROTHY YOUNG Total:1,374.04 Vendor: VEN37735 - DUNHAM ASSOCIATES INC 2,480.002025410301/29/2025226576DUNHAM ASSOCIATES INC UTILITY/ENG BLDG COMMISSIONING INSPECTIONS Vendor VEN37735 - DUNHAM ASSOCIATES INC Total:2,480.00 Vendor: VEN32329 - DUSTIN DOUGHTY 19.002025012201/29/2025226577DUSTIN DOUGHTY D. DOUGHTY - LUNCH REIMBURSEMENT - GREEN EXPO 15.002025012201/29/2025226577DUSTIN DOUGHTY D. DOUGHTY - PARKING REIMBURSEMENT - GREEN EXPO Vendor VEN32329 - DUSTIN DOUGHTY Total:34.00 Vendor: VEN33289 - EBERT, INC. 57,514.522163653401/29/2025226627EBERT, INC.PYMT #10 - UTILITIES BUILDING Vendor VEN33289 - EBERT, INC. Total:57,514.52 Vendor: VEN37664 - EDWARD DON & COMPANY HOLDINGS LLC 401.633293145201/22/2025226483EDWARD DON & COMPANY H…SUPPLIES FOR CLUBHOUSE 1,309.733296344801/22/2025226483EDWARD DON & COMPANY H…SUPPLIES FOR CLUBHOUSE Vendor VEN37664 - EDWARD DON & COMPANY HOLDINGS LLC Total:1,711.36 Vendor: VEN05014 - EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES INC 275.009994301/22/2025226515EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES INC TIF ADMINISTRATION/YELLOWTRE EE APARTMENTS 475.0092816-A01/22/2025226515EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES INC 2015A PAYING AGENT FEE 475.0092817-A01/22/2025226515EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES INC 2017A PAYING AGENT FEE 475.009281801/22/2025226515EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES INC 2018A PAYING AGENT FEE 475.009281901/22/2025226515EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES INC 2019A PAYING AGENT FEE 475.009282001/22/2025226515EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES INC 2019B PAYING AGENT FEE 475.0092821-A01/22/2025226515EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES INC 2021A PAYING AGENT FEE 475.009282201/22/2025226515EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES INC 2023A PAYING AGENT FEE 475.009282301/22/2025226515EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES INC 2024A PAYING AGENT FEE 77.50135101/22/2025226515EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES INC YELLOWTREE 77.50135101/22/2025226515EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES INC TIF 1-19 PAYGO 77.50135101/22/2025226515EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES INC TIF 1-20 PAYGO 77.50135101/22/2025226515EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES INC TIF 1-17PAYGO 275.00135201/22/2025226515EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES INC YELLOWTREE 5,200.00135301/29/2025226547EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES INC YELLOWTREE APARTMENTS Vendor VEN05014 - EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES INC Total:9,860.00 Vendor: VEN06020 - ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY 436.651-1029427501/22/202519957ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY BATTERIES, OIL FILTER - STOCK 12.4274-34392401/22/202519957ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY OIL FILTER - STOCK 157.9674-34416401/22/202519957ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY BATTERY - STOCK -339.821-Z3609001/22/202519957ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CREDIT - BATTERY CORES WARRANTEED -315.921-Z3609101/22/202519957ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CREDIT - BATTERY CORE WARRANTY 157.9674-34437101/22/202519957ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY BATTERY - STOCK -444.731-Z3615801/22/202519957ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CREDIT - WARRANTEED BATTERIES -18.001-Z3620301/22/202519957ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CREDIT - BATTERY CORE 44.001-1036447301/22/202519957ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY FUEL FILTER - 6001/38650 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 1/17/2025 - 1/30/2025 1/30/2025 8:48:38 AM Page 6 of 27 AmountPayable NumberPayment DatePayment NumberVendor Name Description (Item) 235.761-1037183101/22/202519957ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY ROTORS - STOCK 10.4574-34602901/22/202519957ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY OIL FILTERS - STOCK 3.961-1037681001/22/202519957ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY OIL FILTER - STOCK 159.961-Z3633001/22/202519957ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY BATTERY - STOCK 15.8474-34656101/22/202519957ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY OIL FILTERS - STOCK Vendor VEN06020 - ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY Total:116.49 Vendor: VEN05028 - EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANCE, INC. 838.9513485001/22/202519988EMERGENCY APPARATUS MA…FIXED SWITCH ON #3 COMPARTMENT - 3145/38711 Vendor VEN05028 - EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANCE, INC. Total:838.95 Vendor: VEN05060 - EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC 414.40MP121324-5101/22/2025226517EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TE…CLEAR OPTIC LENS - 832/38683 Vendor VEN05060 - EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC Total:414.40 Vendor: VEN36971 - EQUIX HOLDINGS 2,706.003214422701/29/2025226548EQUIX HOLDINGS LOW ZONE WATER TREATMENT PLANT 1,354.003214422701/29/2025226548EQUIX HOLDINGS LOW ZONE WATER TREATMENT PLANT Vendor VEN36971 - EQUIX HOLDINGS Total:4,060.00 Vendor: VEN18053 - EVEREST EMERGENCY VEHICLES, INC 4,184.06W0455301/22/2025226484EVEREST EMERGENCY VEHICL…RPL CONTROL UNIT - 831/38690 Vendor VEN18053 - EVEREST EMERGENCY VEHICLES, INC Total:4,184.06 Vendor: VEN31385 - FARMER BROS CO 2,101.409425546401/29/2025226578FARMER BROS CO COFFEE FOR ICE ARENA Vendor VEN31385 - FARMER BROS CO Total:2,101.40 Vendor: VEN06140 - FASTENAL COMPANY 26.45MNT1112913801/22/202519958FASTENAL COMPANY PLOW BOLTS - 17004270 Vendor VEN06140 - FASTENAL COMPANY Total:26.45 Vendor: VEN14433 - FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2518 1,136.0054191001/22/2025226485FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2…COUP GASKETS/MTR COUPL - WATER Vendor VEN14433 - FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2518 Total:1,136.00 Vendor: VEN31404 - FLEETPRIDE, INC -137.2812248106701/22/2025226486FLEETPRIDE, INC CREDIT - VENDOR ISSUED WRONG ITEM NUMBER 26.8912250433101/22/2025226486FLEETPRIDE, INC LED WORKLIGHT, HITCH CLIP W/CHAIN - STOCK 5.1812250439001/22/2025226486FLEETPRIDE, INC HITCH CLIP W/CHAIN - STOCK 693.0312250496301/22/2025226486FLEETPRIDE, INC ON-SPOT HELMETS & WHEELS - STOCK 10.6912250537501/22/2025226486FLEETPRIDE, INC WHEEL GUARD - STOCK 176.5812274466201/22/2025226486FLEETPRIDE, INC NITRILE GLOVES, BRAKLEEN - SS100 Vendor VEN31404 - FLEETPRIDE, INC Total:775.09 Vendor: VEN36968 - FOBBE ELECTRIC INC 245,403.052024123101/29/2025226628FOBBE ELECTRIC INC PYMT 9 - UTILITITES BUILDING Vendor VEN36968 - FOBBE ELECTRIC INC Total:245,403.05 Vendor: VEN31304 - FRIENDS OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER 1,325.002024CAMELS01/29/2025226549FRIENDS OF THE MISSISSIPPI R…2024 YEARING MONITORING AT CAMEL'S HUMP PARK 985.002024RIVEROAKS01/29/2025226549FRIENDS OF THE MISSISSIPPI R…2024 YEARLY MONITORING @ RIVER OAKS 1,335.002024SETTLERS01/29/2025226549FRIENDS OF THE MISSISSIPPI R…2024 YEARLY MONITORING AT SETTLER'S ISLAND Vendor VEN31304 - FRIENDS OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER Total:3,645.00 Vendor: VEN06261 - FURY CHRYSLER JEEP 9,905.05654386901/22/2025226518FURY CHRYSLER JEEP APM, BPM - 831/38703 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 1/17/2025 - 1/30/2025 1/30/2025 8:48:38 AM Page 7 of 27 AmountPayable NumberPayment DatePayment NumberVendor Name Description (Item) -50.00518657201/22/2025226487FURY CHRYSLER JEEP CREDIT - INV# 5186175 WATER PUMP CORE RETURN 924.00518664701/22/2025226487FURY CHRYSLER JEEP HEADLIGHT - 2160/38675 Vendor VEN06261 - FURY CHRYSLER JEEP Total:10,779.05 Vendor: VEN15387 - GARY ORLOFF 19.002025012201/29/2025226579GARY ORLOFF G. ORLOFF - LUNCH REIMBURSEMENT - GREEN EXPO Vendor VEN15387 - GARY ORLOFF Total:19.00 Vendor: VEN14420 - GENUINE PARTS COMPANY 1,299.0012413801/29/202520000GENUINE PARTS COMPANY JUMPPACK -SEWER 290.0012915801/29/202520000GENUINE PARTS COMPANY BATTERY CHARGER - WATER 47.6213769801/22/202519959GENUINE PARTS COMPANY ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS - 1101/38670 73.8313803701/22/202519959GENUINE PARTS COMPANY SOLENOID, STARTER - 6002/38676 25.6213850201/29/202520014GENUINE PARTS COMPANY AUTO PARTS 108.8213860701/22/202519959GENUINE PARTS COMPANY FORKLIFT BATTERY 57.7813878601/29/202520014GENUINE PARTS COMPANY 2 FUEL FILTERS -9.622514-09237501/29/202520014GENUINE PARTS COMPANY CREDIT CORE DEPOSIT Vendor VEN14420 - GENUINE PARTS COMPANY Total:1,893.05 Vendor: VEN07606 - GERLACH SERVICE INC. 26.126451901/22/202519960GERLACH SERVICE INC.ROLLER CHAIN, LINK - 6002/38676 Vendor VEN07606 - GERLACH SERVICE INC. Total:26.12 Vendor: VEN37590 - GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS INC 1,927.06257467-IN01/29/2025226580GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTE…BATTERIES FOR APX6000/7000/8000 Vendor VEN37590 - GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS INC Total:1,927.06 Vendor: VEN34259 - GONYEA HOMES 163,219.002025012201/29/2025226581GONYEA HOMES CCIP GRANT REIMBURSEMENT - EASTBROOKE 2ND Vendor VEN34259 - GONYEA HOMES Total:163,219.00 Vendor: VEN32232 - GOODYEAR COMMERCIAL TIRE & SERVICE CENTERS 561.96124-111345801/22/2025226488GOODYEAR COMMERCIAL TIR…GY 275/65R18 TIRE - STOCK Vendor VEN32232 - GOODYEAR COMMERCIAL TIRE & SERVICE CENTERS Total:561.96 Vendor: VEN33410 - GOVCONNECTION, INC 764.247606653801/22/202519961GOVCONNECTION, INC CEILING-MOUNT WIFI 7 Vendor VEN33410 - GOVCONNECTION, INC Total:764.24 Vendor: VEN07015 - GRAINGER 187.65936331706701/22/202519962GRAINGER HOLE SAWS, STICK ELECTRODES - SHOP TOOLS 53.60936392856601/22/202519962GRAINGER DRUM HAND PUMP - SHOP TOOL 59.98937385208701/29/202520015GRAINGER TRASH BAGS - 30 GAL Vendor VEN07015 - GRAINGER Total:301.23 Vendor: VEN07023 - GRAPHIC DESIGN INC 50.00QB5720401/22/202519989GRAPHIC DESIGN INC BUSINESS CARDS- N. STANTON 131.00QB5585101/22/202519989GRAPHIC DESIGN INC DOWDLE ART PUZZLE SIGN Vendor VEN07023 - GRAPHIC DESIGN INC Total:181.00 Vendor: VEN13406 - GREAT LAKES COCA-COLA DISTRIBUTION, LLC -75.004520127802501/29/202520016GREAT LAKES COCA-COLA DIS…RETURN CYLINDER 131.584520127802601/29/202520016GREAT LAKES COCA-COLA DIS…BEVERAGES FOR ICE ARENA 854.484520127802601/29/202520016GREAT LAKES COCA-COLA DIS…BEVERAGES FOR ICE ARENA Vendor VEN13406 - GREAT LAKES COCA-COLA DISTRIBUTION, LLC Total:911.06 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 1/17/2025 - 1/30/2025 1/30/2025 8:48:38 AM Page 8 of 27 AmountPayable NumberPayment DatePayment NumberVendor Name Description (Item) Vendor: VEN33879 - GREATAMERICA FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION 343.853836456901/29/2025226582GREATAMERICA FINANCIAL S…FOLDING MACHINE RENTAL - JANUARY 2025 Vendor VEN33879 - GREATAMERICA FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION Total:343.85 Vendor: VEN33637 - GUARDIAN SUPPLY, LLC 199.992028201/29/202520017GUARDIAN SUPPLY, LLC UNIFORM/HOLSTER - E. HAAS 415.392037601/29/202520017GUARDIAN SUPPLY, LLC UNIFORM - S. FOHRMAN 522.422037701/29/202520017GUARDIAN SUPPLY, LLC UNIFORM - J. COLESTOCK 557.422037801/29/202520017GUARDIAN SUPPLY, LLC UNIFORM - J. KELLEY 459.882037901/29/202520017GUARDIAN SUPPLY, LLC UNIFORM - M. GONZALEZ Vendor VEN33637 - GUARDIAN SUPPLY, LLC Total:2,155.10 Vendor: VEN08013 - H&L MESABI 470.001419101/22/202519990H&L MESABI RUBBER BLADES - 8410/38698 486.001419201/22/202519990H&L MESABI RUBBER BLADE - 8409/38697 Vendor VEN08013 - H&L MESABI Total:956.00 Vendor: VEN08001 - HAWKINS, INC 120.00696044801/29/2025226583HAWKINS, INC CHLORINE - HYDROFLUOSILICIC ACID Vendor VEN08001 - HAWKINS, INC Total:120.00 Vendor: VEN29202 - HEGGIES PIZZA LLC 94.25119220801501/29/2025226584HEGGIES PIZZA LLC PIZZA FOR ICE ARENA Vendor VEN29202 - HEGGIES PIZZA LLC Total:94.25 Vendor: VEN30892 - HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC 2,275.00478401/22/2025226519HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE SYST…PHTLS HYBRID COURSE - EMS TRAINING Vendor VEN30892 - HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC Total:2,275.00 Vendor: VEN37672 - HIGH QUALITY MEDICAL EDUCATION 1,100.002901/29/2025226585HIGH QUALITY MEDICAL EDU…T. MIELKE & L. LEE - EMS TRAINING 7,500.003101/29/2025226585HIGH QUALITY MEDICAL EDU…EMS TRAINING - ALL MEDICS Vendor VEN37672 - HIGH QUALITY MEDICAL EDUCATION Total:8,600.00 Vendor: VEN37563 - HOMETOWN FIBER 11,264.00490201/22/2025226489HOMETOWN FIBER BROADBAND AWARE - 50% FINAL Vendor VEN37563 - HOMETOWN FIBER Total:11,264.00 Vendor: VEN37316 - HOSE PROS LLC 55.00878401/22/2025226490HOSE PROS LLC MULTI FLOW AIR & FLUID 1/4" HOSE-U&EB Vendor VEN37316 - HOSE PROS LLC Total:55.00 Vendor: VEN34196 - IDENTISYS INCORPORATED 82.0069985901/22/202519963IDENTISYS INCORPORATED BADGE CARD HOLDERS Vendor VEN34196 - IDENTISYS INCORPORATED Total:82.00 Vendor: VEN33005 - IMAGETREND, INC. 3,858.75PS-INV11134201/29/2025226586IMAGETREND, INC.FTP AUTO EXPORT- 10/24/24- 10/23/25 Vendor VEN33005 - IMAGETREND, INC. Total:3,858.75 Vendor: VEN30088 - INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, INC 522.90608201/22/2025226520INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, I… WATER TESTING Vendor VEN30088 - INSTRUMENTAL RESEARCH, INC Total:522.90 Vendor: VEN09001 - INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION RETIREMENT CORPORATION 2,966.15INV02590401/22/202519964INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAG…1/23/2025 BIWEEKLY PAYROLL- 12/30/2024-1/12/2025 62.46INV02590501/22/202519964INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAG…1/23/2025 BIWEEKLY PAYROLL- 12/30/2024-1/12/2025 8,380.00INV02590601/22/202519964INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAG…1/23/2025 BIWEEKLY PAYROLL- 12/30/2024-1/12/2025 1,361.01INV02590701/22/202519964INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAG…1/23/2025 BIWEEKLY PAYROLL- 12/30/2024-1/12/2025 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 1/17/2025 - 1/30/2025 1/30/2025 8:48:38 AM Page 9 of 27 AmountPayable NumberPayment DatePayment NumberVendor Name Description (Item) 2,503.12INV02590801/22/202519964INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAG…1/23/2025 BIWEEKLY PAYROLL- 12/30/2024-1/12/2025 96.04INV02590901/22/202519964INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAG…1/23/2025 BIWEEKLY PAYROLL- 12/30/2024-1/12/2025 Vendor VEN09001 - INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION RETIREMENT CORPORATION Total:15,368.78 Vendor: VEN09246 - INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 200.008718662401/29/2025226587INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNC…FIRE TRAINING - PRITCHARD Vendor VEN09246 - INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL Total:200.00 Vendor: VEN09240 - INTERSTATE POWER SYSTEMS, INC. 726.00R001216796-0101/29/2025226588INTERSTATE POWER SYSTEMS,…REPAIR STICKY GAS REGULATOR -CALAROSA LIFT STATION Vendor VEN09240 - INTERSTATE POWER SYSTEMS, INC. Total:726.00 Vendor: VEN09024 - INVER GROVE FORD 112.26535280401/22/202519965INVER GROVE FORD RADIATOR CAP, TANK - 1962/38665 33.30535308101/22/202519965INVER GROVE FORD SPARK PLUGS - STOCK 33.30535308201/22/202519965INVER GROVE FORD SPARK PLUGS - STOCK Vendor VEN09024 - INVER GROVE FORD Total:178.86 Vendor: VEN09103 - IUOE CENTRAL PENSION FUND 8,064.00INV02589401/22/202519966IUOE CENTRAL PENSION FUND 1/9/2025 BIWEEKLY PAYROLL- 12/16/24-12/29/24 8,064.00INV02591001/22/202519966IUOE CENTRAL PENSION FUND 1/23/2025 BIWEEKLY PAYROLL- 12/30/2024-1/12/2025 Vendor VEN09103 - IUOE CENTRAL PENSION FUND Total:16,128.00 Vendor: VEN35071 - IUOE LOCAL 49 TRAINING CENTER 2,288.002025012101/29/2025226589IUOE LOCAL 49 TRAINING CEN…2025 TRAINING CENTER FEES 208.002025012101/29/2025226589IUOE LOCAL 49 TRAINING CEN…2025 TRAINING CENTER FEES 208.002025012101/29/2025226589IUOE LOCAL 49 TRAINING CEN…2025 TRAINING CENTER FEES 2,080.002025012101/29/2025226589IUOE LOCAL 49 TRAINING CEN…2025 TRAINING CENTER FEES 624.002025012101/29/2025226589IUOE LOCAL 49 TRAINING CEN…2025 TRAINING CENTER FEES 1,872.002025012101/29/2025226589IUOE LOCAL 49 TRAINING CEN…2025 TRAINING CENTER FEES 208.002025012101/29/2025226589IUOE LOCAL 49 TRAINING CEN…2025 TRAINING CENTER FEES 1,248.002025012101/29/2025226589IUOE LOCAL 49 TRAINING CEN…2025 TRAINING CENTER FEES Vendor VEN35071 - IUOE LOCAL 49 TRAINING CENTER Total:8,736.00 Vendor: VEN10112 - J R'S APPLIANCE DISPOSAL INC. 162.0011469701/29/2025226590J R'S APPLIANCE DISPOSAL INC.DISPOSAL OF OLD SENSUS METER PARTS&EQUIPMENT- WATER Vendor VEN10112 - J R'S APPLIANCE DISPOSAL INC. Total:162.00 Vendor: VEN34937 - JAMES ROBERT SMITH 390.00635501/22/2025226491JAMES ROBERT SMITH OPTIC - SIMULATOR RIFLE Vendor VEN34937 - JAMES ROBERT SMITH Total:390.00 Vendor: VEN35610 - JASON JOECKEL 15.002025012201/29/2025226591JASON JOECKEL J. JOECKEL - PARKING REIMBURSEMENT - GREEN EXPO 19.002025012201/29/2025226591JASON JOECKEL J. JOECKEL - LUNCH REIMBURSEMENT - GREEN EXPO Vendor VEN35610 - JASON JOECKEL Total:34.00 Vendor: VEN08309 - JEFF HENDRICKSON 19.002025012201/29/2025226592JEFF HENDRICKSON J. HENDRICKSON - LUNCH REIMBURSEMENT - GREEN EXPO Vendor VEN08309 - JEFF HENDRICKSON Total:19.00 Vendor: VEN10068 - JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1,566.12270778401/22/2025226492JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR …ALCOHOL FOR CLUBHOUSE Vendor VEN10068 - JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Total:1,566.12 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 1/17/2025 - 1/30/2025 1/30/2025 8:48:38 AM Page 10 of 27 AmountPayable NumberPayment DatePayment NumberVendor Name Description (Item) Vendor: VEN37345 - JORDAN LEVIE 19.002025012201/29/2025226593JORDAN LEVIE J. LEVIE - LUNCH REIMBURSEMENT - GREEN EXPO Vendor VEN37345 - JORDAN LEVIE Total:19.00 Vendor: VEN37667 - JOSEPH M PAVEL 75.002025010801/22/2025226521JOSEPH M PAVEL PHOTO CONTEST WINNER Vendor VEN37667 - JOSEPH M PAVEL Total:75.00 Vendor: VEN33186 - JOSH THIESCHAFER 19.002025012201/29/2025226594JOSH THIESCHAFER J. THIESCHAFER - LUNCH REIMBURSEMENT - GREEN EXPO 20.002025012201/29/2025226594JOSH THIESCHAFER J. THIESCHAFER - PRKG REIMBURSEMENT - GREEN EXPO Vendor VEN33186 - JOSH THIESCHAFER Total:39.00 Vendor: VEN31197 - JT SERVICES OF MINNESOTA 6,400.00JT25-010-0901/22/202519967JT SERVICES OF MINNESOTA HAWTHORNE 3RD DEVELOPMENT STREETLIGHT BASES Vendor VEN31197 - JT SERVICES OF MINNESOTA Total:6,400.00 Vendor: VEN36407 - KAP EDUCATION INC 64.001829501/29/2025226550KAP EDUCATION INC MAILBOX PLATES/NAME PLATES/PAR TAGS 30.301849201/22/2025226493KAP EDUCATION INC 3 NAME PLATES - PW 15.001851601/22/2025226493KAP EDUCATION INC NEW EMPLOYEE NAME PLATE - PW 48.001857401/29/2025226595KAP EDUCATION INC 6 COUNCIL MEMBER PLATES Vendor VEN36407 - KAP EDUCATION INC Total:157.30 Vendor: VEN34290 - KEVIN J ROTTY 2,100.002025012001/22/2025226494KEVIN J ROTTY PIANO PERFORMANCE 2/21/25 Vendor VEN34290 - KEVIN J ROTTY Total:2,100.00 Vendor: VEN31717 - KRAFT CONTRACTING LLC 1,411.003790301/22/202519968KRAFT CONTRACTING LLC RPL BOILER DISPLAY - HERO CTR 1,875.763792401/22/202519968KRAFT CONTRACTING LLC RPL NEW MOTOR - PUBLIC WORKS Vendor VEN31717 - KRAFT CONTRACTING LLC Total:3,286.76 Vendor: VEN29232 - KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 578,897.516828601/29/2025226629KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRU…PYMT #11 UTILITIES BUILDING Vendor VEN29232 - KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Total:578,897.51 Vendor: VEN35046 - K-SUN CORPORATION 442.76SINV014101301/22/202519969K-SUN CORPORATION LABEL MAKER AND TAPE - U&EB -70.00SCR000572201/22/202519969K-SUN CORPORATION CREDIT LABEL MAKER PRICE - U&EB Vendor VEN35046 - K-SUN CORPORATION Total:372.76 Vendor: VEN36012 - LANCE ZAHNOW 19.002025012201/29/2025226596LANCE ZAHNOW L. ZAHNOW - LUNCH REIMBURSEMENT - GREEN EXPO Vendor VEN36012 - LANCE ZAHNOW Total:19.00 Vendor: VEN35654 - LARKIN HOFFMAN DALY & LINDGREN LTD 524.0085122601/29/202520001LARKIN HOFFMAN DALY & LI…AGG INDUSTRIES MINE EXPANSION-ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Vendor VEN35654 - LARKIN HOFFMAN DALY & LINDGREN LTD Total:524.00 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 1/17/2025 - 1/30/2025 1/30/2025 8:48:38 AM Page 11 of 27 AmountPayable NumberPayment DatePayment NumberVendor Name Description (Item) Vendor: VEN12341 - LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC 231.93931212628401/22/2025226495LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC WASHERS, DISCS, ORINGS,FITTINGS - STOCK & SS100 -37.20960015739701/22/2025226495LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC CREDIT-INV# 9312074522 REP ORDERED BY MISTAKE Vendor VEN12341 - LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC Total:194.73 Vendor: VEN12370 - LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INS TRUST 24,682.25943101/29/2025226598LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIE…LMCIT CLAIM#LMC GL 000000399446 Vendor VEN12370 - LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INS TRUST Total:24,682.25 Vendor: VEN12339 - LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 1,830.0041980901/29/2025226597LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 2025 CONTRIBUTION - STORMWATER Vendor VEN12339 - LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES Total:1,830.00 Vendor: VEN31896 - LEVANDER, GILLEN & MILLER, P.A. 112.002025123101/29/202520002LEVANDER, GILLEN & MILLER, …AURORA STRATEGIC ADVISORS 110.002025123101/29/202520002LEVANDER, GILLEN & MILLER, …RAVINE PARKWAY-RIGHT OF WAY 96.002025123101/29/202520002LEVANDER, GILLEN & MILLER, …TOWING CONTRACT 208.002025123101/29/202520002LEVANDER, GILLEN & MILLER, …MISCELLANEOUS PERSONNEL 409.502025123101/29/202520002LEVANDER, GILLEN & MILLER, …MISCELLANEOUS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 192.002025123101/29/202520002LEVANDER, GILLEN & MILLER, …DECKARD SOFTWARE 256.002025123101/29/202520002LEVANDER, GILLEN & MILLER, …CITY WIDE FIBER NETWORK 192.002025123101/29/202520002LEVANDER, GILLEN & MILLER, …SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER 752.002025123101/29/202520002LEVANDER, GILLEN & MILLER, …POLCO SUBSCRIPTION 2,898.202025123101/29/202520002LEVANDER, GILLEN & MILLER, …MISCELLANEOUS POLICE 2,750.002025123101/29/202520002LEVANDER, GILLEN & MILLER, …MAYOR & COUNCI… 104.002025123101/29/202520002LEVANDER, GILLEN & MILLER, …ROSS EASEMENT 32.002025123101/29/202520002LEVANDER, GILLEN & MILLER, …DEFENSIVE DRIVING 148.002025123101/29/202520002LEVANDER, GILLEN & MILLER, …GIES PROPERTY 192.002025123101/29/202520002LEVANDER, GILLEN & MILLER, …DECKARD SOFTWARE 704.002025123101/29/202520002LEVANDER, GILLEN & MILLER, …MISCELLANEOUS EDA 112.002025123101/29/202520002LEVANDER, GILLEN & MILLER, …HERO CENTER 32.002025123101/29/202520002LEVANDER, GILLEN & MILLER, …T-MOBILE INNSDALE WATER TOWER 32.002025123101/29/202520002LEVANDER, GILLEN & MILLER, …AT&T LEASE-INNSDALE WATER TOWER 32.002025123101/29/202520002LEVANDER, GILLEN & MILLER, …VERIZON WIRE LEASE-PUBLIC WORKS SITE 340.002025123101/29/202520002LEVANDER, GILLEN & MILLER, …EAST PT DOUGLAS/JAMAICA AVE PROJECT 2,769.002025123101/29/202520002LEVANDER, GILLEN & MILLER, …ROBINSON ASSESSMENT APPEAIL 2,781.002025123101/29/202520002LEVANDER, GILLEN & MILLER, …WEINMANN ASSESSMENT APPEAL 184.002025123101/29/202520002LEVANDER, GILLEN & MILLER, …2026 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT 824.002025123101/29/202520002LEVANDER, GILLEN & MILLER, …LOW ZONE WATER TOWER 208.002025123101/29/202520002LEVANDER, GILLEN & MILLER, …INFOSEND AGEEMENT 80.002025123101/29/202520002LEVANDER, GILLEN & MILLER, …INVOICE CLOUD CONTRACT 80.002025123101/29/202520002LEVANDER, GILLEN & MILLER, …INVOICE CLOUD CONTRACT 208.002025123101/29/202520002LEVANDER, GILLEN & MILLER, …INFOSEND AGEEMENT 582.502025123101/29/202520002LEVANDER, GILLEN & MILLER, …ROER'S APT-CAMEL'S HUMP ADD 32.002025123101/29/202520002LEVANDER, GILLEN & MILLER, …MCHATTIE-MINOR SUBIDIVISON 272.002025123101/29/202520002LEVANDER, GILLEN & MILLER, …PARK HIGH SCHOOL Vendor VEN31896 - LEVANDER, GILLEN & MILLER, P.A. Total:17,724.20 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 1/17/2025 - 1/30/2025 1/30/2025 8:48:38 AM Page 12 of 27 AmountPayable NumberPayment DatePayment NumberVendor Name Description (Item) Vendor: VEN29309 - LVC COMPANIES, INC. 23,922.0015226701/22/202519991LVC COMPANIES, INC.Public Works Security Upgrade Vendor VEN29309 - LVC COMPANIES, INC. Total:23,922.00 Vendor: VEN35668 - M|P V ONION PARENT LLC 62.74MP26716301/22/2025226522M|P V ONION PARENT LLC OAKWOOD PARK TOILET RENTAL 62.74MP26716401/22/2025226522M|P V ONION PARENT LLC DOG PARK TOILET RENTAL 105.46MP26716501/22/2025226522M|P V ONION PARENT LLC RIVER OAKS TOILET RENTAL 128.22MP26716601/22/2025226522M|P V ONION PARENT LLC HAMLET PARK TOILET RENTAL 62.74MP26716801/22/2025226522M|P V ONION PARENT LLC WOODRIDGE TOILET RENTAL 15.00MP26716901/22/2025226522M|P V ONION PARENT LLC GREY CLOUD ISLAND TOILET RENTAL 62.74MP26717001/22/2025226522M|P V ONION PARENT LLC PINE TREE VALLEY TOILET RENTAL 62.74MP26717101/22/2025226522M|P V ONION PARENT LLC PW TOILET RENTAL 128.22MP26717201/22/2025226522M|P V ONION PARENT LLC KINGSTON PARK TOILET RENTAL 15.00MP26717301/22/2025226522M|P V ONION PARENT LLC GLACIAL VALLEY TOILET RENTAL Vendor VEN35668 - M|P V ONION PARENT LLC Total:705.60 Vendor: VEN13494 - MARCO HOLDINGS, LLC 682.50INV1317646401/22/202519992MARCO HOLDINGS, LLC MITEL IP PHONES 64.168508301/22/202519970MARCO HOLDINGS, LLC WEB FAX SERVICES - 1/16/25- 2/15/25 4,151.00INV1342803201/29/202520018MARCO HOLDINGS, LLC HP DesignJet T1600 SR with Ink and delivery 516.00INV1342803401/29/202520018MARCO HOLDINGS, LLC UTILITY/ENG START UP SUPPLY- INK 1,017.00INV1343474901/29/202520018MARCO HOLDINGS, LLC Service/Maintenance 3YR contract Vendor VEN13494 - MARCO HOLDINGS, LLC Total:6,430.66 Vendor: VEN33904 - MARIO MEJIA 19.002025012201/29/2025226599MARIO MEJIA M. MEJIA - LUNCH REIMBURSEMENT - GREEN EXPO Vendor VEN33904 - MARIO MEJIA Total:19.00 Vendor: VEN07655 - MARK GORGUS 19.002025012201/29/2025226600MARK GORGUS M. GORGUS - LUNCH REIMBURSEMENT - GREEN EXPO Vendor VEN07655 - MARK GORGUS Total:19.00 Vendor: VEN29447 - MCI INC 80,332.432024123101/29/2025226630MCI INC PYMT #2 - UTILITIES BUILDING Vendor VEN29447 - MCI INC Total:80,332.43 Vendor: VEN34894 - MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 1,106.453929093501/29/2025226601MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY C…BODY WASH GUN-UEB Vendor VEN34894 - MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY Total:1,106.45 Vendor: VEN13662 - MEDICA 4,251.3956973735287901/29/2025226602MEDICA COBRA PREMIUM-FEBRUARY 2025 5,912.9856973735287901/29/2025226602MEDICA MN STAT 299A.465 PREMIUM- FEBRUARY 2025 120,199.5756973735287901/29/2025226602MEDICA EMPLOYER PREMIUM- FEBRUARY 2025 20,207.2456973735287901/29/2025226602MEDICA EMPLOYEE PREMIUM- FEBRUARY 2025 Vendor VEN13662 - MEDICA Total:150,571.18 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 1/17/2025 - 1/30/2025 1/30/2025 8:48:38 AM Page 13 of 27 AmountPayable NumberPayment DatePayment NumberVendor Name Description (Item) Vendor: VEN37650 - MEMBERSPORTS INC 11,936.0020801/29/2025226603MEMBERSPORTS INC MemberSports Annual Vendor VEN37650 - MEMBERSPORTS INC Total:11,936.00 Vendor: VEN13410 - MENARDS 8.7925001/22/202519971MENARDS BRASS HEX BUSHING - WATER 89.9594901/22/202519971MENARDS LIFTING SLING/4 CYCLE FUEL/RATCHET STRAPS-WATER 49.44134101/22/202519971MENARDS BIT SOCKET SET/GLOVES/SHANK SOCKET SET - WATER 24.80225501/22/202519971MENARDS GOO GONE/BATTERIES 73.01230301/22/202519971MENARDS TOWER HEATER/MOUS… 42.71230601/22/202519971MENARDS TEFLON TAPE/GLASS CLNR/POSTER STRIPS/ROPE HOOK-SHO 95.95239501/22/202519971MENARDS ACRYLIC SHEET/HOLE SAW/SILICONE-STREETLIGHT 81.50240801/22/202519971MENARDS C & D BATTERIES - FM 14.77247601/22/202519971MENARDS BATTERIES - 9 VOLT 95.012504-202501/22/202519971MENARDS SOLDERING IRO/HEAT GUN/SHEARS - WATER 99.87250501/29/202520019MENARDS SHOVELS/OUTLET ADAPTERS/RESIN SHELF-UEB 304.19251201/22/202519971MENARDS BRAKE CLEANER/TOWELS/SOAP/WAX -STREETS 43.95257501/22/202519971MENARDS GARBAGE DISPOSAL CLEANER 2.99261201/22/202519971MENARDS 5MM DRILL BIT - SIGN SHOP 7.74261801/29/202520019MENARDS 2 PKG - PURIFIED WATER GALLON 343.37236201/22/202519971MENARDS WALL CABINET/TAPE - SHOP 1.99265801/29/202520019MENARDS WINDSHIELD WASH - STREETLIGHTS 20.742686-202501/29/202520019MENARDS TOILET BOWL CLEANER/DISHWANDS/BA… 8.44285401/29/202520019MENARDS GORILLA MOUNTING TAPE 24.952868-202501/29/202520019MENARDS KLEENEX - CLOROX WIPES 36.84287801/29/202520019MENARDS 5 GALLON PAILS/BRUSH/SHINE WASH WAX-WATER 41.61291901/29/202520019MENARDS MICROFIBER RAGS/SOAP/3M HOOKS- U&EB 8.99294801/29/202520019MENARDS TIRE CHUCK INFLATOR Vendor VEN13410 - MENARDS Total:1,521.60 Vendor: VEN13461 - METRO SALES INCORPORATED 1,064.65INV269110601/22/202519993METRO SALES INCORPORATED RICOH COPIER USAGE - 12/04/24 - 01/03/25 642.61INV269110601/22/202519993METRO SALES INCORPORATED RICOH COPIER USAGE - 12/04/24 - 01/03/25 218.50INV269110601/22/202519993METRO SALES INCORPORATED RICOH COPIER USAGE - 12/04/24 - 01/03/25 718.42INV269110601/22/202519993METRO SALES INCORPORATED RICOH COPIER USAGE - 12/04/24 - 01/03/25 99.94INV269110601/22/202519993METRO SALES INCORPORATED RICOH COPIER USAGE - 12/04/24 - 01/03/25 99.95INV269110601/22/202519993METRO SALES INCORPORATED RICOH COPIER USAGE - 12/04/24 - 01/03/25 64.81INV269110601/22/202519993METRO SALES INCORPORATED RICOH COPIER USAGE - 12/04/24 - 01/03/25 164.74INV269110601/22/202519993METRO SALES INCORPORATED RICOH COPIER USAGE - 12/04/24 - 01/03/25 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 1/17/2025 - 1/30/2025 1/30/2025 8:48:38 AM Page 14 of 27 AmountPayable NumberPayment DatePayment NumberVendor Name Description (Item) 235.64INV269110601/22/202519993METRO SALES INCORPORATED RICOH COPIER USAGE - 12/04/24 - 01/03/25 Vendor VEN13461 - METRO SALES INCORPORATED Total:3,309.26 Vendor: VEN13412 - METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 240,810.22118135701/22/202519972METROPOLITAN COUNCIL FEBRUARY 2025 WASTE WATER SERVICES Vendor VEN13412 - METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Total:240,810.22 Vendor: VEN37737 - METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 336.575776632 FEB 202501/29/2025226604METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURA…PREMIUM- FEBURARY 2025 7,119.335776632 FEB 202501/29/2025226604METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURA…PREMIUM- FEBURARY 2025 4,212.995776632 FEB 202501/29/2025226604METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURA…PREMIUM- FEBURARY 2025 Vendor VEN37737 - METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Total:11,668.89 Vendor: VEN31496 - MIDWAY FORD 216.8986508401/22/2025226496MIDWAY FORD AIR FILTERS, TIRE SENSOR - STOCK 123.2486519701/22/2025226496MIDWAY FORD CABIN FILTER - STOCK 387.3086566901/22/2025226496MIDWAY FORD ROTORS, BRAKE PAD - STOCK 387.3086570201/22/2025226496MIDWAY FORD ROTORS & BRAKE PAD - STOCK 192.4886623501/22/2025226496MIDWAY FORD SPARK PLUGS, WIPERS - STOCK Vendor VEN31496 - MIDWAY FORD Total:1,307.21 Vendor: VEN35490 - MIDWEST WASH SYSTEMS LLC 254.352380901/22/202519973MIDWEST WASH SYSTEMS LLC SPRAYER, NOZZLES, NPT ENDS - PUBLIC WORKS 663.202385301/22/202519973MIDWEST WASH SYSTEMS LLC TRUCK & EQUIPMENT WASH - U&EB Vendor VEN35490 - MIDWEST WASH SYSTEMS LLC Total:917.55 Vendor: VEN35607 - MIKE SCHWERY 19.002025012201/29/2025226605MIKE SCHWERY M. SCHWERY - LUNCH REIMBURSEMENT - GREEN EXPO Vendor VEN35607 - MIKE SCHWERY Total:19.00 Vendor: VEN31972 - MIKE WEBER 19.002025012201/29/2025226606MIKE WEBER M. WEBER - LUNCH REIMBURSEMENT - GREEN EXPO Vendor VEN31972 - MIKE WEBER Total:19.00 Vendor: VEN35690 - MINNESOTA AG POWER INC 6,247.061074769901/22/202519974MINNESOTA AG POWER INC RAHN BALLFIELD DRAG 37.991034223101/29/202520020MINNESOTA AG POWER INC 12" SAW BLADES - PARKS Vendor VEN35690 - MINNESOTA AG POWER INC Total:6,285.05 Vendor: VEN37671 - MINNESOTA CIT 975.0030901/29/2025226607MINNESOTA CIT N. ARRIGONI - EMS TRAINING Vendor VEN37671 - MINNESOTA CIT Total:975.00 Vendor: VEN04017 - MINNESOTA DNR - OMB 31,278.751977-6349-202401/29/2025226608MINNESOTA DNR - OMB 2024 WATER APPROPRIATION FEE Vendor VEN04017 - MINNESOTA DNR - OMB Total:31,278.75 Vendor: VEN30384 - MINNESOTA GLOVE INC 79.9835048001/22/2025226497MINNESOTA GLOVE INC HONCHARENKO UNIFORM 119.9435089701/29/2025226609MINNESOTA GLOVE INC HENDRICKSON UNIFORM 144.9835092501/29/2025226609MINNESOTA GLOVE INC HONCHARENKO UNIFORM Vendor VEN30384 - MINNESOTA GLOVE INC Total:344.90 Vendor: VEN13473 - MN CHILD SUPPORT CENTER 36.91INV02591301/22/2025226498MN CHILD SUPPORT CENTER 1/23/2025 BIWEEKLY PAYROLL- 12/30/2024-1/12/2025 Vendor VEN13473 - MN CHILD SUPPORT CENTER Total:36.91 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 1/17/2025 - 1/30/2025 1/30/2025 8:48:38 AM Page 15 of 27 AmountPayable NumberPayment DatePayment NumberVendor Name Description (Item) Vendor: VEN13352 - MN DEPT OF HEALTH 33,385.772025012801/29/2025226551MN DEPT OF HEALTH 2024 4TH QTR WATER CONNECTION FEE Vendor VEN13352 - MN DEPT OF HEALTH Total:33,385.77 Vendor: VEN13439 - MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 55.0020250103-A01/22/2025226499MN POLLUTION CONTROL AG…WASTEWATER EXAM FEE- BOETTNER Vendor VEN13439 - MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY Total:55.00 Vendor: VEN13395 - MN RECREATION & PARK ASSOCIATION 310.002025012301/29/2025226610MN RECREATION & PARK ASS…2025 MEMBERSHIP - DOCKTER 310.0020250123-A01/29/2025226610MN RECREATION & PARK ASS…2025 MEMBERSHIP - PIETRUSZEWSKI Vendor VEN13395 - MN RECREATION & PARK ASSOCIATION Total:620.00 Vendor: VEN13452 - MN STREET SUPERINTENDENTS ASSOCIATION 200.002025011501/22/2025226500MN STREET SUPERINTENDENT…2025 MEMEBERSHIP - ORLOFF, GORGUS, WEBER, DOUGHTY 200.002025011501/22/2025226500MN STREET SUPERINTENDENT…2025 MEMEBERSHIP - BURFIEND, MOSHIER, HOCHSTETLER Vendor VEN13452 - MN STREET SUPERINTENDENTS ASSOCIATION Total:400.00 Vendor: VEN13930 - MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC 5,400.00141115603101/29/2025226611MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC VIDEO MANAGER EL CLOUD- 2/12/25-2/11/26 Vendor VEN13930 - MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC Total:5,400.00 Vendor: VEN13463 - MTI DISTRIBUTING CO. 1,597.471460024-0001/29/202520021MTI DISTRIBUTING CO.ROTOR/WRENCH/SCREWS/CO UPLING/STATOR Vendor VEN13463 - MTI DISTRIBUTING CO. Total:1,597.47 Vendor: VEN37343 - NATHAN HEILMAN 19.002025012201/29/2025226612NATHAN HEILMAN N. HEILMAN - LUNCH REIMBURSEMENT - GREEN EXPO Vendor VEN37343 - NATHAN HEILMAN Total:19.00 Vendor: VEN14443 - NCPERS MINNESOTA - 403800 336.0040380002202501/29/202520022NCPERS MINNESOTA - 403800 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM- FEBRUARY 2025 Vendor VEN14443 - NCPERS MINNESOTA - 403800 Total:336.00 Vendor: VEN37512 - NORTH AMERICAN RESCUE HOLDINGS LLC 2,486.00IN86476401/29/2025226613NORTH AMERICAN RESCUE H…STOP THE BLEED KITS Vendor VEN37512 - NORTH AMERICAN RESCUE HOLDINGS LLC Total:2,486.00 Vendor: VEN14455 - NORTHERN SAFETY COMPANY INC 784.3290665468701/29/202520023NORTHERN SAFETY COMPANY…SQUEEGEES AND HANDLES - UEB Vendor VEN14455 - NORTHERN SAFETY COMPANY INC Total:784.32 Vendor: VEN15402 - OFFICE OF MN IT SERVICES 38.85W2412062501/29/2025226552OFFICE OF MN IT SERVICES VOICE SERVICES Vendor VEN15402 - OFFICE OF MN IT SERVICES Total:38.85 Vendor: VEN15362 - OPUS21 MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS 287.4124120501/29/202520005OPUS21 MANAGEMENT SOLU…UB CALL CENTER SUPPORT SERVICES- DEC 2024 548.4624120501/29/202520005OPUS21 MANAGEMENT SOLU…UB POSTAGE SERVICES- DEC 2024 987.0024120501/29/202520005OPUS21 MANAGEMENT SOLU…UB HOSTING SERVICES- DEC 2024 264.0024120501/29/202520005OPUS21 MANAGEMENT SOLU…UB BILL PRINT SERVICES- DEC 2024 1,153.0024120501/29/202520005OPUS21 MANAGEMENT SOLU…UB CALL CENTER SUPPORT SERVICES- DEC 2024 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 1/17/2025 - 1/30/2025 1/30/2025 8:48:38 AM Page 16 of 27 AmountPayable NumberPayment DatePayment NumberVendor Name Description (Item) 2,192.0024120501/29/202520005OPUS21 MANAGEMENT SOLU…UB POSTAGE SERVICES- DEC 2024 3,948.0024120501/29/202520005OPUS21 MANAGEMENT SOLU…UB HOSTING SERVICES- DEC 2024 1,058.0024120501/29/202520005OPUS21 MANAGEMENT SOLU…UB BILL PRINT SERVICES- DEC 2024 1,153.0024120501/29/202520005OPUS21 MANAGEMENT SOLU…UB CALL CENTER SUPPORT SERVICES- DEC 2024 2,192.0024120501/29/202520005OPUS21 MANAGEMENT SOLU…UB POSTAGE SERVICES- DEC 2024 3,948.0024120501/29/202520005OPUS21 MANAGEMENT SOLU…UB HOSTING SERVICES- DEC 2024 1,058.0024120501/29/202520005OPUS21 MANAGEMENT SOLU…UB BILL PRINT SERVICES- DEC 2024 288.0024120501/29/202520005OPUS21 MANAGEMENT SOLU…UB CALL CENTER SUPPORT SERVICES- DEC 2024 548.0024120501/29/202520005OPUS21 MANAGEMENT SOLU…UB POSTAGE SERVICES- DEC 2024 988.1424120501/29/202520005OPUS21 MANAGEMENT SOLU…UB HOSTING SERVICES- DEC 2024 264.0024120501/29/202520005OPUS21 MANAGEMENT SOLU…UB BILL PRINT SERVICES- DEC 2024 Vendor VEN15362 - OPUS21 MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS Total:20,877.01 Vendor: VEN30439 - O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 59.303266-17087501/22/2025226501O'REILLY AUTO PARTS CABIN FILTERS - STOCK 89.773266-17093501/22/2025226501O'REILLY AUTO PARTS CONTROL VALVE - 4102/38679 22.943266-17101901/22/2025226501O'REILLY AUTO PARTS LIGHT BULB - 8204/38688 323.303266-17115501/22/2025226501O'REILLY AUTO PARTS BATTERY - STOCK 17.143266-17118501/22/2025226501O'REILLY AUTO PARTS WASHER PUMP - 6002/38676 225.063266-17151301/22/2025226501O'REILLY AUTO PARTS BATTERY - 2257/38685 450.123266-17154701/22/2025226501O'REILLY AUTO PARTS BATTERY - STOCK 16.993266-17154801/22/2025226501O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 3V BATTERIES - SS100 101.313266-17168201/29/2025226614O'REILLY AUTO PARTS OIL FILTER - 5 QT MOTOR OIL Vendor VEN30439 - O'REILLY AUTO PARTS Total:1,305.93 Vendor: VEN32617 - OXYGEN FORENSICS, INC 3,695.0099906-101/29/2025226615OXYGEN FORENSICS, INC Oxygen Forensics Renewal Vendor VEN32617 - OXYGEN FORENSICS, INC Total:3,695.00 Vendor: VEN31236 - OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY, INC 346.20879748801/22/2025226502OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY, …ACETYLENE, OXYGEN, CO2 DIOXIDE - WELDING SUPPLIES 149.42879845301/22/2025226502OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY, …GRINDING DISCS - SS100 Vendor VEN31236 - OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY, INC Total:495.62 Vendor: VEN33593 - PARMAN ENERGY GROUP 94.90278124-IN01/22/202519975PARMAN ENERGY GROUP DEF FLUID FOR BULK TANK 94.90278124-IN01/22/202519975PARMAN ENERGY GROUP DEF FLUID FOR BULK TANK 94.91278124-IN01/22/202519975PARMAN ENERGY GROUP DEF FLUID FOR BULK TANK Vendor VEN33593 - PARMAN ENERGY GROUP Total:284.71 Vendor: VEN35191 - PB PARENT HOLDCO, LP 355.40IV0031695101/22/2025226503PB PARENT HOLDCO, LP HAZMAT/DOT/SAFETY/COMPLI ANCE- GLACIAL VALLEY PARK Vendor VEN35191 - PB PARENT HOLDCO, LP Total:355.40 Vendor: VEN35773 - PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP INC 1,090.0840699601/22/2025226504PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP …FOOD FOR CLUBHOUSE 45.7941053101/22/2025226504PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP …FOOD FOR CLUBHOUSE Vendor VEN35773 - PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP INC Total:1,135.87 Vendor: VEN34122 - PERFORMANCE PLUS, LLC 553.501106218601/22/202519976PERFORMANCE PLUS, LLC MEDICAL EXAM/PHY TEST/DRUG SCREEN- L.ADEN Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 1/17/2025 - 1/30/2025 1/30/2025 8:48:38 AM Page 17 of 27 AmountPayable NumberPayment DatePayment NumberVendor Name Description (Item) 496.001106218801/22/202519976PERFORMANCE PLUS, LLC MEDICAL EXAM/PHY TEST/DRUG SCREEN- J. COLESTOCK 563.001106220201/22/202519976PERFORMANCE PLUS, LLC MEDICAL EXAM/PHY TEST/DRUG SCREEN - R. SHEAK Vendor VEN34122 - PERFORMANCE PLUS, LLC Total:1,612.50 Vendor: VEN36014 - PHILLIP NORGARD 132.002025012301/29/2025226616PHILLIP NORGARD PER DIEM - MN RURAL WATER TRAINING-P. NORGARD Vendor VEN36014 - PHILLIP NORGARD Total:132.00 Vendor: VEN16138 - PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION -7.372025010801/22/202519977PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREM…DEDUCTION IN ERROR CORRECTION- PERA ID:4038-00 64,894.44INV02591401/22/202519977PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREM…1/23/2025 BIWEEKLY PAYROLL- 12/30/2024-1/12/2025 85,760.87INV02591501/22/202519977PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREM…1/23/2025 BIWEEKLY PAYROLL- 12/30/2024-1/12/2025 Vendor VEN16138 - PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION Total:150,647.94 Vendor: VEN35706 - PURE TAP INC 114.00PT-4874401/22/2025226505PURE TAP INC DRAUGHT LINE CLEANING Vendor VEN35706 - PURE TAP INC Total:114.00 Vendor: VEN18051 - R & R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN, INC 115.0084412-IN01/29/202520024R & R SPECIALTIES OF WISCO…BLADE SHARPENING Vendor VEN18051 - R & R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN, INC Total:115.00 Vendor: VEN32756 - RAMSEY/WASHINGTON RECYCLING & ENERGY 450.19RESFA-00783501/29/2025226553RAMSEY/WASHINGTON RECY…TRASH DISPOSAL - Vendor VEN32756 - RAMSEY/WASHINGTON RECYCLING & ENERGY Total:450.19 Vendor: VEN18058 - REGIONS HOSPITAL 54.53928006501/29/2025226554REGIONS HOSPITAL DRUG/SUPPLY CHARGES Vendor VEN18058 - REGIONS HOSPITAL Total:54.53 Vendor: VEN18108 - RICE LAKE CONTRACTING CORP 27,773.272025011301/22/202519994RICE LAKE CONTRACTING CORP PYMT 7 & FINAL - WELL 2/7 INTERIM WTP Vendor VEN18108 - RICE LAKE CONTRACTING CORP Total:27,773.27 Vendor: VEN37668 - RJ KOOL MIDWEST INC 2,798.00SO2093701/29/2025226617RJ KOOL MIDWEST INC WASHER/DRYER - UEB Vendor VEN37668 - RJ KOOL MIDWEST INC Total:2,798.00 Vendor: VEN30854 - ROHN INDUSTRIES, INC 44.754003501/22/202519978ROHN INDUSTRIES, INC DOCUMENT SHREDDING Vendor VEN30854 - ROHN INDUSTRIES, INC Total:44.75 Vendor: VEN35612 - ROY QUINN 19.002025012201/29/2025226618ROY QUINN R. QUINN- LUNCH REIMBURSEMENT - GREEN EXPO Vendor VEN35612 - ROY QUINN Total:19.00 Vendor: VEN37666 - SABRINA THURINGER 75.002025010801/22/2025226523SABRINA THURINGER PHOTO CONTEST WINNER Vendor VEN37666 - SABRINA THURINGER Total:75.00 Vendor: VEN31969 - SAFE-FAST, INC 121.90INV30256501/22/202519979SAFE-FAST, INC HOLMES UNIFORM 114.92INV30256601/22/202519979SAFE-FAST, INC COULTER UNIFORM Vendor VEN31969 - SAFE-FAST, INC Total:236.82 Vendor: VEN29489 - SCHILLING SUPPLY COMPANY 2,102.48990367-0001/22/202519980SCHILLING SUPPLY COMPANY TOWEL ROLLS,SOAP,TISSUE,CANLINER S - PUBLIC WORKS Vendor VEN29489 - SCHILLING SUPPLY COMPANY Total:2,102.48 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 1/17/2025 - 1/30/2025 1/30/2025 8:48:38 AM Page 18 of 27 AmountPayable NumberPayment DatePayment NumberVendor Name Description (Item) Vendor: VEN19467 - SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. 1,568.2048063701/29/202520007SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON…GOODVIEW WATER SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS 100,417.0848063901/29/202520007SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON…HIGH ZONE WATER MAIN DESIGN Vendor VEN19467 - SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. Total:101,985.28 Vendor: VEN35233 - SKYLINE RETAIL ACQUISTION I, LLC 600.00250017131601/22/202519995SKYLINE RETAIL ACQUISTION I,… 4TH QTR DISPLAY STORAGE - OCT-DEC 2024 Vendor VEN35233 - SKYLINE RETAIL ACQUISTION I, LLC Total:600.00 Vendor: VEN35034 - SMOOT ENTERPRISES ADVANCED SPORTSWEAR LLC 50.002580101/29/202520025SMOOT ENTERPRISES ADVAN…HONCHARENKO UNIFORM Vendor VEN35034 - SMOOT ENTERPRISES ADVANCED SPORTSWEAR LLC Total:50.00 Vendor: VEN19285 - SOUTH EAST TOWING INC 30.0024754701/22/2025226524SOUTH EAST TOWING INC CGPD TOWING Vendor VEN19285 - SOUTH EAST TOWING INC Total:30.00 Vendor: VEN37564 - STEPHEN S CHANDLER 8,937.50190701/29/2025226619STEPHEN S CHANDLER STRATEGIC PLANNING SERVICES - PHASE 3 Vendor VEN37564 - STEPHEN S CHANDLER Total:8,937.50 Vendor: VEN37669 - STERN ELECTRIC 50.002025011601/29/2025226620STERN ELECTRIC REFUND BUILDING PERMIT #2025-031774 Vendor VEN37669 - STERN ELECTRIC Total:50.00 Vendor: VEN33489 - STEVEN MICHAEL WICKELGREN 600.00159301/22/202519996STEVEN MICHAEL WICKELGREN COUNSELING SERVICES - Vendor VEN33489 - STEVEN MICHAEL WICKELGREN Total:600.00 Vendor: VEN37638 - STORAGE SOLUTIONS INC 28,312.50D9356401/22/2025226525STORAGE SOLUTIONS INC SHELFING UNITS FOR UTILITY & ENGINEERING BUILDING Vendor VEN37638 - STORAGE SOLUTIONS INC Total:28,312.50 Vendor: VEN19352 - SYSCO MINNESOTA INC. 1,224.8154769190401/29/202520026SYSCO MINNESOTA INC.FOOD SUPPLIES FOR ICE ARENA 798.8554769324101/22/202519981SYSCO MINNESOTA INC.FOOD FOR CLUBHOUSE 1,386.3554770278601/29/202520026SYSCO MINNESOTA INC.FOOD/SUPPLIES FOR ICE ARENA Vendor VEN19352 - SYSCO MINNESOTA INC. Total:3,410.01 Vendor: VEN35979 - TEESNAP LLC 4,003.122024-4039601/22/2025226526TEESNAP LLC TEESNAP PLATFORM FEE Vendor VEN35979 - TEESNAP LLC Total:4,003.12 Vendor: VEN20038 - TENNIS SANITATION LLC 66.84415613901/22/2025226527TENNIS SANITATION LLC DEC 2024 TRASH SERVICE - HERO CENTER Vendor VEN20038 - TENNIS SANITATION LLC Total:66.84 Vendor: VEN32056 - THE COTTAGE GROVE PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS 750.00INV02591101/22/202519982THE COTTAGE GROVE PROFES…1/23/2025 BIWEEKLY PAYROLL- 12/30/2024-1/12/2025 Vendor VEN32056 - THE COTTAGE GROVE PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS Total:750.00 Vendor: VEN20159 - TOTAL TOOL SUPPLY, INC. 179.00166632301/22/202519983TOTAL TOOL SUPPLY, INC.HIGH TORQUE WRECH/LASER METER - WATER 345.94166654901/29/202520027TOTAL TOOL SUPPLY, INC.HIGH TORQUE WRENCH FRICTION RINGS- WATER Vendor VEN20159 - TOTAL TOOL SUPPLY, INC. Total:524.94 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 1/17/2025 - 1/30/2025 1/30/2025 8:48:38 AM Page 19 of 27 AmountPayable NumberPayment DatePayment NumberVendor Name Description (Item) Vendor: VEN35705 - TRAVIS MARK SCHUETTE 3,186.003422101/22/2025226506TRAVIS MARK SCHUETTE IMPACT,DRILL,BATTERIES,GRIN DER - TOOLS Vendor VEN35705 - TRAVIS MARK SCHUETTE Total:3,186.00 Vendor: VEN20045 - TRI COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSOCIATION 90.0010101/29/2025226621TRI COUNTY LAW ENFORCEM…2025 MEMBERSHIP DUES Vendor VEN20045 - TRI COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSOCIATION Total:90.00 Vendor: VEN20141 - TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC 1,418.0025-49428301/29/2025226622TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC Tyler Payments Terminals Vendor VEN20141 - TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC Total:1,418.00 Vendor: VEN21000 - ULINE 1,776.8318806243101/29/202520028ULINE TRASH LINERS/TRASH CANS/UTILITY CART-UEB 525.9618815263101/29/202520028ULINE BROOMS FOR NEW UEB 1,206.9018822949501/29/202520028ULINE TRASH CANS/UTILITY CART FOR UEB Vendor VEN21000 - ULINE Total:3,509.69 Vendor: VEN22333 - VALLEY SALES OF HASTINGS, INC. 181.8010349201/22/2025226507VALLEY SALES OF HASTINGS, I…MODULE KIT, MOTOR - 1101/38670 Vendor VEN22333 - VALLEY SALES OF HASTINGS, INC. Total:181.80 Vendor: VEN34977 - VESTIS GROUP INC 189.68250058628101/22/202519984VESTIS GROUP INC RESTAURANT LINEN/SUPPLIES SVCS Vendor VEN34977 - VESTIS GROUP INC Total:189.68 Vendor: VEN37662 - VICTORIA HANNER 106.982025011001/22/2025226528VICTORIA HANNER REFUND FOR SERVICES Vendor VEN37662 - VICTORIA HANNER Total:106.98 Vendor: VEN23259 - WASHINGTON CONSERVATION DISTRICT 231.00679301/29/2025226555WASHINGTON CONSERVATIO…EROSION/SEDIMENT - HINTON WOODS 231.00679301/29/2025226555WASHINGTON CONSERVATIO…EROSION/SEDIMENT - GRAYMONT VILLAGE 1ST ADD 231.00679301/29/2025226555WASHINGTON CONSERVATIO…EROSION/SEDIMENT - EASTBROOKE 3RD ADDITION 231.00679301/29/2025226555WASHINGTON CONSERVATIO…EROSION/SEDIMENT - CARDINAL RESERVE 231.00679301/29/2025226555WASHINGTON CONSERVATIO…EROSION/SEDIMENT - CALAROSA 6TH ADDITION 198.00679301/29/2025226555WASHINGTON CONSERVATIO…EROSION/SEDIMENT - HAWTHORNE 3RD ADDITION 214.50679301/29/2025226555WASHINGTON CONSERVATIO…EROSION/SEDIMENT - ROLLING MEADOWS 198.00679301/29/2025226555WASHINGTON CONSERVATIO…EROSION/SEDIMENT - EASTBROOKE 2ND ADDITION 132.00679301/29/2025226555WASHINGTON CONSERVATIO…EROSION/SEDIMENT - GRAYMONT VILLAGE 2ND ADD 99.00679301/29/2025226555WASHINGTON CONSERVATIO…EROSION/SEDIMENT - WOODWARD PONDS 2ND ADD 99.00679301/29/2025226555WASHINGTON CONSERVATIO…EROSION/SEDIMENT - GLACIAL VALLEY ESTATES 2ND ADD 66.00679301/29/2025226555WASHINGTON CONSERVATIO…EROSION/SEDIMENT - HOHENSTEIN 214.50679301/29/2025226555WASHINGTON CONSERVATIO…EROSION/SEDIMENT - SUMMER VALLEY 264.00679301/29/2025226555WASHINGTON CONSERVATIO…EROSION/SEDIMENT - HAWTHORNE 2ND ADDITION 231.00679301/29/2025226555WASHINGTON CONSERVATIO…EROSION/SEDIMENT - RAVINE CROSSING 744.50679301/29/2025226555WASHINGTON CONSERVATIO…EROSION/SEDIMENT - MISSISSIPPI LANDING 1ST ADD Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 1/17/2025 - 1/30/2025 1/30/2025 8:48:38 AM Page 20 of 27 AmountPayable NumberPayment DatePayment NumberVendor Name Description (Item) 632.00682301/29/2025226555WASHINGTON CONSERVATIO…EROSION/SEDIMENT - MISSISSIPPI LANDING 1ST ADD 363.00682301/29/2025226555WASHINGTON CONSERVATIO…EROSION/SEDIMENT - ROLLING MEADOWS 330.00682301/29/2025226555WASHINGTON CONSERVATIO…EROSION/SEDIMENT - GRAYMONT 2ND ADDITION 330.00682301/29/2025226555WASHINGTON CONSERVATIO…EROSION/SEDIMENT - GRAYMONT 1ST ADDITION 297.00682301/29/2025226555WASHINGTON CONSERVATIO…EROSION/SEDIMENT - SUMMER VALLEY 297.00682301/29/2025226555WASHINGTON CONSERVATIO…EROSION/SEDIMENT - HAWTHORNE 2ND ADDITION 264.00682301/29/2025226555WASHINGTON CONSERVATIO…EROSION/SEDIMENT - CARDINAL RESERVE 264.00682301/29/2025226555WASHINGTON CONSERVATIO…EROSION/SEDIMENT - CALAROSA 6TH ADDITION 165.00682301/29/2025226555WASHINGTON CONSERVATIO…EROSION/SEDIMENT - HOHHENSTEIN 165.00682301/29/2025226555WASHINGTON CONSERVATIO…EROSION/SEDIMENT - HINTON WOODS 165.00682301/29/2025226555WASHINGTON CONSERVATIO…EROSION/SEDIMENT - HAWTHORNE 3RD ADDITION 165.00682301/29/2025226555WASHINGTON CONSERVATIO…EROSION/SEDIMENT - EASTBROOKE 2ND ADDITION 148.00682301/29/2025226555WASHINGTON CONSERVATIO…EROSION/SEDIMENT - 3M 132.00682301/29/2025226555WASHINGTON CONSERVATIO…EROSION/SEDIMENT - WOODWARD PONDS 2ND ADD 165.00682301/29/2025226555WASHINGTON CONSERVATIO…EROSION/SEDIMENT - RAVINE CROSSING 99.00682301/29/2025226555WASHINGTON CONSERVATIO…EROSION/SEDIMENT - EASTBROOKE 3RD ADDITION 716.31683601/29/2025226555WASHINGTON CONSERVATIO…4TH QTR - SHARED WATER RESOURCE EDUCATOR PROGRAM Vendor VEN23259 - WASHINGTON CONSERVATION DISTRICT Total:8,312.81 Vendor: VEN23139 - WASHINGTON COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH & ENVIRONMENT DEPT 157.572025011501/22/202519997WASHINGTON COUNTY PUBLI…DECEMBER 2024 CHARGES Vendor VEN23139 - WASHINGTON COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH & ENVIRONMENT DEPT Total:157.57 Vendor: VEN23153 - WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE 802.8822780701/22/202519998WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERI…JUNE-DEC 2024 K9 CARE Vendor VEN23153 - WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE Total:802.88 Vendor: VEN23256 - WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE, INC. 583.601460501/29/202520029WATER CONSERVATION SERV…LOCATE LEAK HEMMINGWAY ST -WATER Vendor VEN23256 - WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE, INC. Total:583.60 Vendor: VEN29141 - WATSON COMPANY INC. 812.3614728801/29/2025226623WATSON COMPANY INC.SNACKS FOR ICE ARENA -54.4014732801/29/2025226623WATSON COMPANY INC.RETURN PRODUCT 527.8014742301/29/2025226623WATSON COMPANY INC.FOOD/SUPPLIES FOR ICE ARENA 216.6714742701/29/2025226623WATSON COMPANY INC.SNACKS FOR ICE ARENA Vendor VEN29141 - WATSON COMPANY INC. Total:1,502.43 Vendor: VEN23122 - WEATHER WATCH INC 220.001255801/22/202519999WEATHER WATCH INC WEATHER SERVICE - Vendor VEN23122 - WEATHER WATCH INC Total:220.00 Vendor: VEN31081 - WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP, INC 629.69INV61561801/29/2025226624WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GRO…FIRE EQUIPMENT REPAIR/REPLACE Vendor VEN31081 - WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP, INC Total:629.69 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 1/17/2025 - 1/30/2025 1/30/2025 8:48:38 AM Page 21 of 27 AmountPayable NumberPayment DatePayment NumberVendor Name Description (Item) Vendor: VEN30736 - WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS, INC 7,229.689793101/29/2025226559WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGI…NEW PW UTILITY FACILITY Vendor VEN30736 - WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS, INC Total:7,229.68 Vendor: VEN24065 - XCEL ENERGY 11.2991100242001/22/2025226529XCEL ENERGY 8193 GRANGE BLVD UNIT SIREN-12/11/24-1/12/25 40.3090663192701/24/2025226531XCEL ENERGY 9200 GRANADA AVE S FEEDPOINT- 11/10/24- 12/11/24 5,367.1890663692101/24/2025226531XCEL ENERGY HERO CENTER ELEC- 11/10/24- 12/11/24 67.2090664144901/24/2025226531XCEL ENERGY 8500 95TH ST S UNIT TRAFFIC SIG- 11/10/24-12/11/24 172.7090664757101/24/2025226531XCEL ENERGY 8031 80TH ST S FEEDPOINT - 11/10/24-12/11/24 130.3490665762301/24/2025226531XCEL ENERGY 6490 IDSEN AVE S FEEDPOINT- 11/10/24-12/11/24 159.8990668591201/24/2025226531XCEL ENERGY 9900A JAMAICA AVE UNIT LIGHT- 11/10/24-12/11/24 66.0690668696301/24/2025226531XCEL ENERGY 7901A 100TH ST S - 11/10/24- 12/11/24 73.3990668920101/24/2025226531XCEL ENERGY 7064 W PT DOUGLAS RD S FEEDPOINT-11/10/24… 69.0990669192201/24/2025226531XCEL ENERGY 10500A IDEAL AVE S LIGHT- 11/10/24-12/11/24 1,002.5690670504501/24/2025226531XCEL ENERGY 8540 81ST ST S UNIT WELL 7 - 11/10/24-12/11/24 99.5390671519501/24/2025226531XCEL ENERGY PINE COULEE LIGHTS- 11/10/24-12/10/24 91.0490682859601/24/2025226531XCEL ENERGY 9750 65TH ST S FEEDPOINT - 11/10/24-12/10/24 42.5090685217901/24/2025226531XCEL ENERGY 6497 INSPIRE CIR S FEEDPOINT- 11/10/24-12/10/24 30,090.3790694663301/24/2025226531XCEL ENERGY WATER- 11/9/24-12/10/24 23,983.3890720002901/24/2025226531XCEL ENERGY ICE ARENA- 11/10/24-12/11/24 73.5390983291501/22/2025226529XCEL ENERGY 8490A E POINT DOUGLAS UNIT - 12/05/24-01/06/25 78.3490985808201/29/2025226560XCEL ENERGY 8729 HILLSIDE TRL S UNIT ST LTS - 12/6/24-01/5/25 57.9490987585801/22/2025226529XCEL ENERGY 10920 E POINT DOUGLAS S- 12/04/24-01/06/25 488.7991015357701/22/2025226529XCEL ENERGY 8490A E POINT DOUGLAS UNIT TEMP-12/05/24-01/06/25 51.2891054065801/22/2025226529XCEL ENERGY 8311 60TH ST S UNIT ST LIGHT- 12/10/24-1/12/25 41.8091057869201/22/2025226529XCEL ENERGY 6497 INSPIRE CIR S FEEDPOINT- 12/11/24-1/12/25 16.9391057983701/22/2025226529XCEL ENERGY 6527 GENEVIEVE TRL FEEDPOINT-12/10/24-1/12/25 45.7991058919501/22/2025226529XCEL ENERGY 6424 HARKNESS AVE S FEEDPOINT-12/10/24-1/12/25 167.9091059865801/29/2025226560XCEL ENERGY 9900A JAMAICA AVE S UNIT LIGHT- 12/11/24-1/12/25 34.4891060059201/29/2025226560XCEL ENERGY 7696A 106TH ST S- 01/10/24- 1/12/25 42.8091060158001/29/2025226560XCEL ENERGY 9810A UPPER 89TH ST- 12/10/24-1/12/25 25.0991064796001/29/2025226560XCEL ENERGY SEWER LIFT STATION- 12/11/24-1/13/25 93.9191065951001/29/2025226560XCEL ENERGY 9750 65TH ST S FEEDPOINT- 12/10/24-1/12/25 65.7891066701201/29/2025226560XCEL ENERGY 7901A 100TH ST S- 12/11/24- 1/12/25 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 1/17/2025 - 1/30/2025 1/30/2025 8:48:38 AM Page 22 of 27 AmountPayable NumberPayment DatePayment NumberVendor Name Description (Item) 449.7491067663601/29/2025226560XCEL ENERGY GLACIAL VELLEY PARK - 11/7/24-12/10/25 66.0991067910701/29/2025226560XCEL ENERGY PINE COULEE LIGHTS-12/4/24- /1/6/25 185.0391072061901/29/2025226560XCEL ENERGY LIFT STATION- 12/10/24- 1/12/25 19.9691073815901/29/2025226560XCEL ENERGY GLENDENNING- 12/14/24- 1/13/25 206.7791076703401/29/2025226560XCEL ENERGY SOUTHPOINT- 12/11/24- 1/13/25 41.2991082708101/22/2025226529XCEL ENERGY 7064 W PT DOUGLAS RD S FEEDPOINT-12/11/24-1/13/25 165.2791086176501/22/2025226529XCEL ENERGY 8031 80TH ST S FEEDPOINT - 12/11/24-1/13/25 690.7691087797101/29/2025226560XCEL ENERGY 8540 81ST ST S UNIT WELL7- 12/11/24-1/13/25 286.4791095444001/29/2025226560XCEL ENERGY PRO SHOP - 12/11/24-1/13/25 114.6491095444001/29/2025226560XCEL ENERGY MAINT BLDG - 12/11/24- 1/13/25 -49.5091095444001/29/2025226560XCEL ENERGY PUMPHOUSE - 12/11/24- 1/13/25 1,053.8691095444001/29/2025226560XCEL ENERGY CLUBHOUSE - 12/11/24- 1/13/25 24,504.7191096608901/29/2025226560XCEL ENERGY ICE ARENA-12/11/24-1/13/25 68.6091100159201/22/2025226529XCEL ENERGY 6490 IDSEN AVE S FEEDPOINT- 12/11/24-1/12/25 59.1291101203401/22/2025226529XCEL ENERGY 8500 95TH ST S UNIT TRAFFIC SIG-12/11/24-1/12/25 5,089.2491101526401/29/2025226560XCEL ENERGY HERO CENTER ELEC- 12/11/24- 1/12/25 12.0491105797901/29/2025226560XCEL ENERGY 9200 GRANADA AVE S FEEDPOINT- 12/11/24-1/12/25 101.8291108361301/29/2025226560XCEL ENERGY 10500A IDEAL AVE S UNIT LIGHT- 12/11/24-1/12/25 821.3391116078401/29/2025226560XCEL ENERGY TRAFFIC SIGNALS- 01/10/24- 1/12/25 25,281.2891135163401/29/2025226560XCEL ENERGY WATER-12/10/24-1/12/25 4,111.2391228897401/29/2025226560XCEL ENERGY PSCH ELECTRICITY & GAS- 12/4/24-1/6/25 Vendor VEN24065 - XCEL ENERGY Total:126,030.93 Vendor: VEN26201 - ZIEGLER INC. 100.89IN00176622601/22/202519985ZIEGLER INC.PLATES, RIVETS - 8204/38688 Vendor VEN26201 - ZIEGLER INC. Total:100.89 Vendor: VEN33052 - ZOHO CORPORATION 7,947.00502000396301/22/202519986ZOHO CORPORATION ManageEngine ServiceDeskAudit Renew Vendor VEN33052 - ZOHO CORPORATION Total:7,947.00 Vendor: VEN37639 - ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION 1,524.009010780301/29/2025226625ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION PORTION OF 1 YR PAYMENT - CARDIAC MONITORS Vendor VEN37639 - ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION Total:1,524.00 Grand Total:2,511,892.70 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 1/17/2025 - 1/30/2025 1/30/2025 8:48:38 AM Page 23 of 27 Report Summary Fund Summary Payment AmountFund 100 - GENERAL FUND 116,451.23 230 - SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT 168,682.18 250 - ICE ARENA 57,376.47 255 - GOLF COURSE SPECIAL REVENUE FUND 14,682.01 265 - CG CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU 192.00 285 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 22,450.00 290 - HERO CENTER OPERATIONS 13,220.82 305 - 2019B EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATE 475.00 310 - 2018A IMPROVEMENT BONDS 475.00 315 - 2019A GO CIP BONDS 475.00 320 - TAX INCREMENT - UP NORTH 77.50 330 - 2021A GO IMPROVEMENT BONDS 475.00 371 - 2017A GO CIP BONDS 475.00 455 - 3M SETTLEMENT - MPCA 134,311.87 492 - 2015A GO IMPROVEMENT BONDS 475.00 494 - 2023A BONDS 475.00 495 - 2024A GO BONDS 475.00 510 - FUTURE PROJECTS 7,478.33 515 - PARK CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 96.00 520 - MSA CONSTRUCTION 413.53 535 - TIF 1-20 NORTHPOINT 77.50 540 - TIF 1-17 Dominium 77.50 560 - PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT 5,734.00 575 - WATER CONNECT/AREA 824.00 610 - WATER OPERATING 1,152,903.63 620 - SEWER OPERATING 251,739.34 630 - STREET LIGHTS 15,014.23 660 - COTTAGE GROVE EMS 20,386.03 700 - SELF INSURANCE 75,258.74 710 - FLEET MAINTENANCE 38,850.04 720 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 67,557.27 810 - DEVELOPER LETTER OF CREDIT 9,007.00 990 - PAYROLL FUND 335,231.48 2,511,892.70Grand Total: Account Summary Payment AmountAccount Number Account Name 100-00-9100-2034 COBRA INSURANCE 4,587.96 100-02-0110-4210 OP SUPPLY-OTHER 48.00 100-02-0110-4302 LEGAL SERVICE 170.00 100-03-0150-4302 LEGAL SERVICE 7,975.70 100-08-0395-4434 SPECIAL EVENTS 2,800.00 100-09-2500-4200 OFFICE SUPPLIES 466.12 100-09-2500-4305 FEES FOR SERVICE 44.75 100-09-2500-4360 UTILITIES 4,111.23 100-09-2500-4372 MAINT-REPAIR/BLD 175.29 100-09-2500-4380 RENTAL/LEASE 1,408.50 100-13-1000-3140 BUILDING PERMIT 119.00 100-13-1000-4340 PRINTING 50.00 100-15-0400-4210 OP SUPPLY-OTHER 52.26 100-15-0400-4360 UTILITIES 11.29 100-21-0500-4200 OFFICE SUPPLIES 308.96 100-21-0500-4210 OP SUPPLY-OTHER 267.12 100-21-0500-4217 CLOTHING/UNIFORM 199.99 100-21-0500-4300 PROF SERVICES 1,059.00 100-21-0500-4305 FEES FOR SERVICE 16,365.35 100-21-0500-4370 MAINT-REPAIR/EQ 2,350.61 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 1/17/2025 - 1/30/2025 1/30/2025 8:48:38 AM Page 24 of 27 Account Summary Payment AmountAccount Number Account Name 100-21-0500-4380 RENTAL/LEASE 42,500.77 100-21-0500-4401 DUES & SUBS 90.00 100-21-0500-4449 OTHER CONTRACT 30.00 100-21-0532-4210 OP SUPPLY-OTHER 160.36 100-21-0537-4300 PROF SERVICES 388.36 100-21-0537-4305 FEES FOR SERVICE 802.88 100-23-0450-4217 CLOTHING/UNIFORM 1,955.11 100-23-0450-4305 FEES FOR SERVICE 2,112.00 100-26-0800-4210 OP SUPPLY-OTHER 38.85 100-26-0800-4217 CLOTHING/UNIFORM 64.00 100-26-0800-4272 OP SUP-BUILDINGS 20.74 100-26-0800-4300 PROF SERVICES 553.50 100-26-0800-4305 FEES FOR SERVICE 2,591.07 100-26-0800-4360 UTILITIES 926.35 100-26-0800-4370 MAINT-REPAIR/EQ 1,233.19 100-26-0800-4372 MAINT-REPAIR/BLD 309.24 100-26-0800-4380 RENTAL/LEASE 218.50 100-26-0800-4403 TRAVEL/TRAIN/CON 200.00 100-31-1200-4210 OP SUPPLY-OTHER 346.19 100-31-1200-4217 CLOTHING/UNIFORM 119.94 100-31-1200-4270 OP SUP-VEH/EQ 94.90 100-31-1200-4302 LEGAL SERVICE 104.00 100-31-1200-4401 DUES & SUBS 200.00 100-31-1200-4403 TRAVEL/TRAIN/CON 2,508.00 100-32-1260-4231 SMALL TOOLS 2.99 100-32-1260-4403 TRAVEL/TRAIN/CON 227.00 100-34-1290-4302 LEGAL SERVICE 32.00 100-35-2005-4200 OFFICE SUPPLIES 245.66 100-35-2005-4210 OP SUPPLY-OTHER 45.30 100-35-2005-4272 OP SUP-BUILDINGS 2,102.48 100-35-2005-4305 FEES FOR SERVICE 220.00 100-35-2005-4372 MAINT-REPAIR/BLD 2,130.11 100-35-2005-4380 RENTAL/LEASE 781.16 100-35-2005-4401 DUES & SUBS 200.00 100-35-2009-4360 UTILITIES 19.96 100-36-2200-4403 TRAVEL/TRAIN/CON 227.00 100-41-1500-4210 OP SUPPLY-OTHER 3,927.96 100-41-1500-4217 CLOTHING/UNIFORM 511.78 100-41-1500-4270 OP SUP-VEH/EQ 94.90 100-41-1500-4305 FEES FOR SERVICE 355.40 100-41-1500-4360 UTILITIES 1,243.35 100-41-1500-4380 RENTAL/LEASE 537.40 100-41-1500-4403 TRAVEL/TRAIN/CON 2,080.00 100-41-1500-4405 CLEAN/WASTE REMV 607.76 100-51-2300-4380 RENTAL/LEASE 99.94 100-51-2300-4401 DUES & SUBS 620.00 230-60-3200-4300 PROF SERVICES 716.31 230-60-3200-4301 ENGINEERING SVS 163,219.00 230-60-3200-4302 LEGAL SERVICE 148.00 230-60-3200-4403 TRAVEL/TRAIN/CON 682.00 230-61-3200-4401 DUES & SUBS 1,830.00 230-61-3260-4305 FEES FOR SERVICE 287.41 230-61-3260-4311 POSTAGE 548.46 230-61-3260-4321 DATA PROCESSING 987.00 230-61-3260-4340 PRINTING 264.00 250-77-3700-4209 OP SUPPLIES-CLEN 59.98 250-77-3700-4210 OP SUPPLY-OTHER 562.98 250-77-3700-4212 LUB/ADD 101.31 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 1/17/2025 - 1/30/2025 1/30/2025 8:48:38 AM Page 25 of 27 Account Summary Payment AmountAccount Number Account Name 250-77-3700-4310 COMMUNICATION 282.86 250-77-3700-4360 UTILITIES 48,488.09 250-77-3700-4370 MAINT-REPAIR/EQ 115.00 250-77-3700-4380 RENTAL/LEASE 99.95 250-77-3700-4401 DUES & SUBS 446.00 250-77-3700-4438 VENDING RESALE 56.58 250-77-3740-4438 CONCESSIONS RESALE 7,163.72 255-53-2100-4210 OP SUPPLY-OTHER 213.00 255-53-2100-4310 COMMUNICATION 1,016.17 255-53-2100-4360 UTILITIES 674.06 255-55-2105-4200 OFFICE SUPPLIES 18.95 255-55-2105-4210 OP SUPPLY-OTHER 126.66 255-55-2105-4270 OP SUP-VEH/EQ 1,671.25 255-55-2105-4305 FEES FOR SERVICE 142.01 255-55-2105-4380 RENTAL/LEASE 105.46 255-55-2110-4360 UTILITIES 430.61 255-55-2110-4380 RENTAL/LEASE 64.81 255-56-2140-4210 OP SUPPLY-OTHER 1,711.36 255-56-2140-4305 FEES FOR SERVICE 303.68 255-56-2140-4360 UTILITIES 2,419.46 255-56-2140-4380 RENTAL/LEASE 164.74 255-56-2140-4434 SPECIAL EVENTS 2,100.00 255-56-2140-4436 CONCESSION RESAL 1,953.67 255-56-2140-4439 LIQUOR - RESALE 1,566.12 265-00-1150-4302 LEGAL SERVICE 192.00 285-12-1135-4210 OP SUPPLY-OTHER 600.00 285-12-1135-4300 PROF SERVICES 14,765.00 285-12-1135-4302 LEGAL SERVICE 704.00 285-12-1135-4305 FEES FOR SERVICE 6,250.00 285-12-1138-4210 OP SUPPLY-OTHER 131.00 290-00-2900-4210 OP SUPPLY-OTHER 458.75 290-00-2900-4302 LEGAL SERVICE 112.00 290-00-2900-4305 FEES FOR SERVICE 371.35 290-00-2900-4360 UTILITIES 10,456.42 290-00-2900-4372 MAINT-REPAIR/BLD 1,519.82 290-00-2900-4380 RENTAL/LEASE 235.64 290-00-2900-4405 CLEAN/WASTE REMV 66.84 305-00-9305-4620 PAYING AGENT FEE 475.00 310-00-9310-4620 PAYING AGENT FEE 475.00 315-00-9315-4620 PAYING AGENT FEE 475.00 320-00-9320-4300 PROF SERVICES 77.50 330-00-9330-4620 PAYING AGENT FEE 475.00 371-00-9371-4620 PAYING AGENT FEE 475.00 455-00-7221-4551 PROJECT-ENGINEER 2,706.00 455-00-7232-4551 PROJECT-ENGINEER 1,568.20 455-00-7245-4551 PROJECT-ENGINEER 100,417.08 455-00-7252-4550 PROJECT-CONTRACT 27,773.27 455-00-7252-4559 PROJECT-OTHER 1,847.32 492-00-9492-4620 PAYING AGENT FEE 475.00 494-00-9494-4620 PAYING AGENT FEE 475.00 495-00-9495-4620 PAYING AGENT FEE 475.00 510-00-6489-4305 FEES FOR SERVICE 3,645.00 510-00-6574-4551 PROJECT-ENGINEER 3,833.33 515-00-9515-4302 LEGAL SERVICE 96.00 520-00-6552-4552 PROJECT-LEGAL 340.00 520-00-6552-4559 PROJECT-OTHER 73.53 535-00-9535-4300 PROF SERVICES 77.50 540-00-9540-4300 PROF SERVICES 77.50 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 1/17/2025 - 1/30/2025 1/30/2025 8:48:38 AM Page 26 of 27 Account Summary Payment AmountAccount Number Account Name 560-00-6578-4552 PROJECT-LEGAL 5,550.00 560-00-9560-4302 LEGAL SERVICE 184.00 575-00-7270-4552 PROJECT-LEGAL 824.00 610-00-7261-4550 PROJECT-CONTRACT 990,460.01 610-00-7261-4551 PROJECT-ENGINEER 11,063.68 610-00-7261-4559 PROJECT-OTHER 14,734.96 610-00-9610-2220 DUE TO OTHER GOV 33,385.77 610-70-3000-4210 OP SUPPLY-OTHER 2,173.73 610-70-3000-4216 FERTILIZER/CHEM 120.00 610-70-3000-4231 SMALL TOOLS 345.94 610-70-3000-4270 OP SUP-VEH/EQ 94.91 610-70-3000-4302 LEGAL SERVICE 288.00 610-70-3000-4305 FEES FOR SERVICE 31,801.65 610-70-3000-4360 UTILITIES 55,371.65 610-70-3000-4371 MAINT-REPAIR/OTH 583.60 610-70-3000-4403 TRAVEL/TRAIN/CON 2,136.00 610-70-3000-4405 CLEAN/WASTE REMV 162.00 610-70-3035-4210 OP SUPPLY-OTHER 420.58 610-70-3035-4272 OP SUP-BUILDINGS 1,410.15 610-71-3060-4305 FEES FOR SERVICE 1,153.00 610-71-3060-4311 POSTAGE 2,192.00 610-71-3060-4321 DATA PROCESSING 3,948.00 610-71-3060-4340 PRINTING 1,058.00 620-80-3100-4210 OP SUPPLY-OTHER 1,299.00 620-80-3100-4302 LEGAL SERVICE 288.00 620-80-3100-4360 UTILITIES 210.12 620-80-3100-4363 MWCC SERVICE 240,810.22 620-80-3100-4372 MAINT-REPAIR/BLD 726.00 620-80-3100-4403 TRAVEL/TRAIN/CON 55.00 620-81-3160-4305 FEES FOR SERVICE 1,153.00 620-81-3160-4311 POSTAGE 2,192.00 620-81-3160-4321 DATA PROCESSING 3,948.00 620-81-3160-4340 PRINTING 1,058.00 630-75-1400-4210 OP SUPPLY-OTHER 97.94 630-75-1400-4305 FEES FOR SERVICE 288.00 630-75-1400-4311 POSTAGE 548.00 630-75-1400-4321 DATA PROCESSING 988.14 630-75-1400-4340 PRINTING 264.00 630-75-1400-4360 UTILITIES 2,420.07 630-75-1400-4371 MAINT-REPAIR/OTH 2,645.66 630-75-1400-4403 TRAVEL/TRAIN/CON 208.00 630-75-1400-4438 PRO/MISC RESALE 6,400.00 630-75-1430-4360 UTILITIES 947.65 630-75-1450-4360 UTILITIES 206.77 660-24-0600-4210 OP SUPPLY-OTHER 2,024.62 660-24-0600-4217 CLOTHING/UNIFORM 174.89 660-24-0600-4370 MAINT-REPAIR/EQ 603.50 660-24-0600-4380 RENTAL/LEASE 1,524.00 660-24-0600-4403 TRAVEL/TRAIN/CON 14,578.00 660-24-9660-1196 ACCTS REC-AMB LIFEQU…106.98 660-24-9660-1200 Ambulance AR EMS MC 1,374.04 700-00-9700-4146 DISABILITY 5,912.98 700-00-9700-4300 PROF SERVICES 600.00 700-00-9700-4530 MACH & EQUIPMENT 23,922.00 700-00-9700-4540 OTHER CAP OUTLAY 13,868.95 700-00-9700-4733 CLAIM-NONCITY PR 24,682.25 700-00-9700-4734 AUTO CLAIMS 6,272.56 710-33-1700-4210 OP SUPPLY-OTHER 895.10 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 1/17/2025 - 1/30/2025 1/30/2025 8:48:38 AM Page 27 of 27 Account Summary Payment AmountAccount Number Account Name 710-33-1700-4231 SMALL TOOLS 3,427.25 710-33-1700-4270 OP SUP-VEH/EQ 11,456.22 710-33-1700-4370 MAINT-REPAIR/EQ 21,823.47 710-33-1700-4403 TRAVEL/TRAIN/CON 1,248.00 720-07-0380-4210 OP SUPPLY-OTHER 764.50 720-07-0380-4280 CAPITAL OUTLAY <$5,000 2,549.24 720-07-0380-4310 COMMUNICATION 9,221.66 720-07-0380-4321 DATA PROCESSING 42,339.87 720-07-0380-4370 MAINT-REPAIR/EQ 12,682.00 810-00-9810-2310 DEPOSITS PAYABLE 9,007.00 990-05-9990-2010 PERA 150,647.94 990-05-9990-2032 GROUP INS-WTHHLD 140,406.81 990-05-9990-2033 DENTAL INS-WITH 11,332.32 990-05-9990-2035 LIFE INS-WITHHLD 560.72 990-05-9990-2037 CHILD SUPPORT 36.91 990-05-9990-2038 UNION DUES 750.00 990-05-9990-2043 DEFERRED COMP 28,897.62 990-05-9990-2044 ROTH 457 2,599.16 Grand Total:2,511,892.70 Project Account Summary Payment AmountProject Account Key **None**1,484,948.23 01-23-019-ESC 582.50 02-23-011-CON 990,460.01 02-23-011-ENG 11,063.68 02-23-011-OTH 14,734.96 02-24-001-LEG 5,550.00 7221-03-ENG 2,706.00 7252-04-OTH 1,847.32 Grand Total:2,511,892.70 PAYROLL CHECK REGISTER BIWEEKLY – PE 01/12/2025 – CK 01/23/2025 - $493,598.67 1 City Council Action Request 13.A. Meeting Date 2/5/2025 Department Administration Agenda Category Action Item Title MN Law Enforcement Support Office (MN_LESO) Participation Staff Recommendation Authorize Cottage Grove Public Safety to continue participating in the Minnesota Law Enforcement Support Office program and the State Plan of Operation (SPO). Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. MN.LESO.Program.Participation.02.05.2025 To:Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From:Peter J Koerner, Director of Public Safety Date:February 5, 2025 Subject: MN LAW ENFORCEMENT SUPPORT OFFICE (MN-LESO) PARTICIPATION Minnesota Law Enforcement Support Office (MN-LESO) is a program which allows law enforcement agencies to obtain surplus Department of Defense (DOD) property at no cost. All items must have a direct application to the law enforcement agency’s public safety mission. Homeland Security and Emergency Management (HSEM) is the administrator of the program in Minnesota. Since enrolling in the MN-LESO program in November 2019, Cottage Grove Public Safety has acquired an armored vehicle, robots, night vision devices, personal protective equipment, first aid supplies, and many more items that have enhanced the capabilities and safety for our officers and the community we serve. The vast majority of the items are considered DEMIL A, which means ownership is conditionally transferred to Cottage Grove Public Safety after one year. Controlled property, such as the armored vehicle and robots, are loaned to the department by the federal government. The State Plan of Operation (SPO) sets forth the terms and conditions, which will be binding on the parties with respect to excess DOD property in order to promote efficient transfer and accountability. HSEM routinely audits participating agencies each year to ensure compliance with the program’s regulations. One of the inspectable items is a document signed by the Chief Law Enforcement Official authorized by the governing body, i.e., Mayor and City Council, authorizing the agency to obtain controlled property. In May 2022, Executive Order #14074 was signed, requiring annual notice given to City Council of the department’s intent to acquire controlled property from federal sources. We must give annual notice to the community of our intent to acquire controlled property at a public council meeting or workshop. We need to demonstrate a commitment to constitutional and community-oriented policing and provide community engagement opportunities to get community input. RECOMMENDATION Authorize Cottage Grove Public Safety to continue participating in the Minnesota Law Enforcement Support Office program and the State Plan of Operation (SPO). 1 City Council Action Request 13.B. Meeting Date 2/5/2025 Department Administration Agenda Category Action Item Title Police - Annual Use of Force Report Staff Recommendation Receive the 2024 annual use of force report. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. Police Use of Force Workshop 02.05.2025 To:Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From:Peter J Koerner, Director of Public Safety Date:January 29, 2025 Subject: WORKSHOP - POLICE ANNUAL USE OF FORCE REPORT INTRODUCTION The Cottage Grove Police Department is proudly and boldly leading police reforms by adapting to evolving community expectations and implementing best practices. Furthermore, our department is dedicated to professionalism, transparency, and accountability. We continuously strive to improve services, safety, and trust. We accomplish these goals with a comprehensive approach to use of force review and analysis, training, reporting, and community input. In 2019, our department implemented a progressive use of force review policy which mandates that every use of force incident is reviewed, data is collected and analyzed, and an annual report is presented. Each use of force incident is reviewed by our Use of Force Review & Training Committee. Each incident is examined for opportunities to improve our decisions, tactics, policy, and equipment. Use of force data, law, and nationally recognized best practices is what drives our training, tactics, policy development, and equipment acquisitions. The annual use of force report identifies trends in use of force data along with training, equipment, and policy recommendations. The annual report is presented to the Chief of Police, City Council, Public Services Commission, and other community stakeholders, providing an opportunity to inform and solicit input. RECOMMENDATION Receive the 2024 annual use of force report. 1 City Council Action Request 13.C. Meeting Date 2/5/2025 Department Administration Agenda Category Action Item Title Police and Fire - 5-Year Strategic Plan Update Staff Recommendation Receive the Police and Fire 5-year Strategic Plan update. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. Council Workshop Police and Fire strategic Plan Updates To:Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From:Peter J Koerner, Director of Public Safety Date:January 29, 2025 Subject: UPDATE ON POLICE AND FIRE 5-YEAR-STRATEGIC PLANS INTRODUCTION In 2024, the public safety team embarked on an ambitious and visionary endeavor to develop a 5-year strategic plan for both the police and fire/EMS divisions. The police department command team collaborated with our employees and citizens throughout the process, creating a plan that is rooted in best practices. The fire department leadership team collaborated with our employees throughout the process, creating a plan that is rooted in best practices. We started the process with our fire leadership team and then introduced it at a department meeting. We have had numerous opportunities for feedback from our team. Both plans were presented to the Public Services Commission and received feedback prior to bringing to the City Council. These plans will be our roadmap to success as Cottage Grove continues to grow and change. Our plan stresses the importance of community-wide cooperation to accomplish our goals. It demonstrates how deeply committed we are to our residents, businesses, organizations, and employees. It ensures Cottage Grove Public Safety will continue to deliver excellent service with professionalism, transparency, and accountability. While still in the first year of the plans, we have accomplished a lot, and we want to recognize all the contributions that the team has made. RECOMMENDATION Receive an update on the police and fire 5-year-strategic plans.