Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2025-03-05 Packet
1 COTTAGE GROVE CITY COUNCIL March 5, 2025 12800 RAVINE PARKWAY SOUTH COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 55016 COUNCIL CHAMBER - 7:00 PM 1 Call to Order 2 Pledge of Allegiance 3 Roll Call 4 Open Forum 5 Adoption of Agenda 6 Presentations A Eagle Scout Award - Owen Behlke Staff Recommendation: Recognize Owen Behlke's accomplishment of Eagle Scout and award him with a plaque. B East Cottage Grove Scramblers Donation to Police K9 Program Staff Recommendation: Accept the donation in the amount of $1,000 from the East Cottage Grove Scramblers to be used for the Police K-9 program. C Craig Woolery Scholarship Fund Check Presentation Staff Recommendation: Allow Justin and Kim Olsen and the Cottage Grove Lions an opportunity to present donations in the amount of $3,500 to the Cottage Grove Public Safety Board. 7 Consent Agenda A City Council Regular Meeting Minutes (2025-02-05) Staff Recommendation: Approve the February 5, 2025, Regular Meeting Minutes. B City Council Special Meeting Minutes (2025-02-19) Staff Recommendation: Approve the February 19, 2025, Special Meeting Minutes. C City Council Regular Meeting (2025-02-19) Staff Recommendation: Approve the February 19, 2025, Regular Meeting Minutes. D Planning Commission Meeting Minutes (2025-01-27) Staff Recommendation: Accept and place on file the minutes from the January 27, 2025, Planning Commission meeting. E Rental License Approvals Staff Recommendation: Approve the issuance of rental licenses to the properties in the attached table. F Convention and Visitors Bureau Appointment - Haatvedt Staff Recommendation: Approve Michael Haatvedt to serve on the Convention and Visitors Bureau for a term ending on December 31, 2028. G Convention and Visitors Bureau 2025 Strategic Plan Staff Recommendation: Receive final 2025 CVB Strategic Plan. 2 H Ordinance 1094 - Lodging Tax Definitions Amendment Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance 1094, amending Chapter 1-5-5 of the Cottage Grove City Code related to lodging tax. I Grant Donation - TJX Law Enforcement Staff Recommendation: Accept the TJX Law Enforcement Grant donation in the amount of $10,000 for the lease of Flock cameras. J MN Department of Public Safety - Therapy Dog Grant Award Staff Recommendation: Accept and approve the Law Enforcement and Fire Department Therapy Dog grant award in the amount of $10,000. K Fee Table Amendment - Tax Increment Financing Staff Recommendation: Approve Ordinance 1095 amending the City Fee Table and adding a $10,000 Tax Increment Financing (TIF) escrow for each proposed TIF project. L Tort Liability Limits Staff Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council not waive the tort cap liability limits. M Low Zone Treatment Plant and Utility/Engineering Building Fiber Optic Cable Project - Final Payment Resolution Correction Staff Recommendation: Rescind Resolution 2025-017 and adopt Resolution 2025-025 approving the final payment for the Low Zone Water Treatment Plant and Utility/Engineering Building Project to Castrejon Inc. in the amount of $75,168.20. N 2025 Annual City-Wide Sweeping – Contract Extension Staff Recommendation: Approve the contract extension with Mike McPhillips, Inc. for the 2025 Annual City- Wide Sweeping project. O Denzer Park Project – Approve Plans and Specifications and Authorize Bidding Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution 2025-029 approving the plans and specifications and authorize bidding for the Denzer Park Project. P Graymont Village Third Addition – Final Plat, Development Agreement, and Development Plans Staff Recommendation: 1) Adopt Resolution 2025-026 approving the Final Plat for Graymont Village Third Addition. 2) Approve the Graymont Village Third Addition Development Agreement with U.S. Home LLC subject to minor modifications by the City Attorney. 3) Adopt Resolution 2025-027 approving the Graymont Village Third Addition Development Plans dated January 31, 2025, prepared by WSB, Inc., subject to final approval by the City Engineer in writing. Q Native Vegetation Management Service Agreement Staff Recommendation: Authorize the Service Agreement with MN Native Landscapes for open space native vegetation management for the amount of $7,400. R Grant Award - Minnesota Historical Society Historical and Cultural Heritage Staff Recommendation: Approve the Historical and Cultural Heritage Grant for the purchase of materials to install historical plaques throughout the community. S Kingston Park Building Final Design Service Agreement Staff Recommendation: Authorize the service agreement with Oertel Architects for final design, bidding and construction administration services for the Kingston Park Building Project. T 2025 Mill and Overlay and Hardwood Court Intersection Improvements – Approve Plans and Specifications and Authorize Bidding Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution 2025-028 approving the plans and specifications and authorize bidding for the 2025 Mill and Overlay and Hardwood Court Intersection Improvements. 8 Approve Disbursements 3 A Approve Disbursements 9 Public Hearings 10 Bid Awards 11 Regular Agenda A Sale of $10,000,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2025A Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution 2025-024, authorizing the issuance and awarding the sale of the $10,000,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2025A, pledging for the security thereof special assessments, net revenues, and tax abatement and levying a tax for the payment thereof. 12 Council Comments and Requests 13 Workshops - Open to Public A Polco Community Survey Workshop Staff Recommendation: Receive presentation and provide feedback regarding the POLCO survey. 14 Workshops - Closed to Public 15 Adjournment 1 City Council Action Request 6.A. Meeting Date 3/5/2025 Department Administration Agenda Category Presentation Title Eagle Scout Award - Owen Behlke Staff Recommendation Recognize Owen Behlke's accomplishment of Eagle Scout and award him with a plaque. Budget Implication N/A Attachments None 1 City Council Action Request 6.B. Meeting Date 3/5/2025 Department Public Safety Agenda Category Presentation Title East Cottage Grove Scramblers Donation to Police K9 Program Staff Recommendation Accept the donation in the amount of $1,000 from the East Cottage Grove Scramblers to be used for the Police K-9 program. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. East Cottage Grove Scramblers Check Presentation Scholarship Fund February 21 2025 2. East Cottage Grove Scramblers Check Presentation Scholarship Fund February 21 2025 To:Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From:Peter J Koerner, Director of Public Safety Date:February 22, 2025 Subject: EAST COTTAGE GROVE SCRAMBLERS DONATION TO K9 PROGRAM INTRODUCTION For the past 5 years, the East Cottage Grove Scramblers (snowmobile club) have hosted an annual Dust ‘Em Off Vintage Snowmobile Show and Swap at the corner of 70th Street and Keats Avenue. The event grows and they have partnered with other organizations to put on the event. This year, the event had a vintage snowmobile radar run and Cottage Grove police set up the speed trailer for the event. Over the years, the department has worked with the snowmobile club with even planning ranging from traffic around the event and parking recommendations. The relationship between the snowmobile club and the police department doesn’t stop with the one-day event. Each year the club meets with the Public Service Commission to reaffirm trail locations and review the ordinance to see if changes need to be made. Cottage Grove is a recreation destination and the snowmobile club’s mission also encourages snowmobiling as a recreational opportunity. The event raises money, and the club puts the money back into the community. Some of the funds go to grooming trails, adding signs, snowmobile safety events to name a few. The club has asked to donate $1,000.00 to the police department specifically for use by the K9 program. Members of the snowmobile club will present a check to the Council and police department after a brief presentation. RECOMMENDATION Accept the donation of $1,000.00 from the East Cottage Grove Scramblers to be used by the police department K9 program. To:Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From:Peter J Koerner, Director of Public Safety Date:February 22, 2025 Subject: EAST COTTAGE GROVE SCRAMBLERS DONATION TO K9 PROGRAM INTRODUCTION For the past five years, the East Cottage Grove Scramblers snowmobile club has organized the annual Dust ‘Em Off Vintage Snowmobile Show and Swap. Held at the intersection of 70th Street and Keats Avenue, this event has experienced consistent growth, leading to partnerships with other organizations to enhance the experience. This year's event featured a vintage snowmobile radar run, with the Cottage Grove Police Department providing their speed trailer for the activity. The department has a long-standing collaborative relationship with the Scramblers, working together on planning aspects of the event, including traffic management and parking recommendations. The relationship between the snowmobile club and the police department extends beyond this annual event. Each year, the club meets with the Public Service Commission to reaffirm trail locations and review the City ordinance, identifying any necessary adjustments. Recognizing Cottage Grove as a recreation destination, the snowmobile club’s mission actively promotes snowmobiling as a valuable recreational opportunity. The event raises money, and the club prioritizes putting the money back into the community. Some of the funds go for grooming trails, adding signs, and snowmobile safety events. This year, the club has asked to donate $1,000 to the police department specifically for use by the K9 program. Members of the snowmobile club will present a check to the Council and police department after a brief presentation. RECOMMENDATION Accept the donation of $1,000 from the East Cottage Grove Scramblers to be used by the police department K9 program. 1 City Council Action Request 6.C. Meeting Date 3/5/2025 Department Public Safety Agenda Category Presentation Title Craig Woolery Scholarship Fund Check Presentation Staff Recommendation Allow Justin and Kim Olsen and the Cottage Grove Lions an opportunity to present donations in the amount of $3,500 to the Cottage Grove Public Safety Board. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. PS Board Check Presentation Scholarship Fund February 20 2025 To:Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From:Peter J Koerner, Director of Public Safety Date:February 20, 2025 Subject: CRAIG WOOLERY SCHOLARSHIP FUND CHECK PRESENTATION INTRODUCTION After Director of Public Safety Craig Woolery’s retirement, Justin and Kim Olsen donated to the Cottage Grove Public Safety Board, creating a scholarship fund. The Olsen’s wanted to recognize the substantial difference Craig made in his 35-year career with Cottage Grove Public Safety and provide others an opportunity to pursue a meaningful law enforcement, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) or firefighter career. Justin and Kim Olsen have committed to a yearly contribution to the scholarship fund. Since that time, residents and the Cottage Grove Lions have provided donations. The Public Safety Board continues to support the scholarship fund. The Cottage Grove Public Safety Board is pleased to offer the Craig Woolery Scholarship to residents of Cottage Grove pursuing post-secondary education in Law Enforcement, EMS or Firefighting. The Cottage Grove Public Safety Board welcomes and supports diversity in the application and award process. Police Department staff will provide an overview of the Public Safety Board and outline some of their donations and their support of Cottage Grove Public Safety. Justin and Kim Olsen will present a check in the amount of $1,500.00 and the Cottage Grove Lions will present a check in the amount of $2,000.00 to the Cottage Grove Public Safety Board for the Woolery Scholarship Fund. RECOMMENDATION Allow Justin and Kim Olsen and the Cottage Grove Lions an opportunity to present donations in the amount of $3,500.00 to the Cottage Grove Public Safety Board. 1 City Council Action Request 7.A. Meeting Date 3/5/2025 Department Administration Agenda Category Action Item Title City Council Regular Meeting Minutes (2025-02-05) Staff Recommendation Approve the February 5, 2025, Regular Meeting Minutes. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. 2025-2-05 City Council Meeting CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE 12800 Ravine Parkway Cottage Grove, Minnesota 55016 www.cottagegrovemn.gov 651-458-2800 Fax 651-458-2897 Equal Opportunity Employer COTTAGE GROVE CITY COUNCIL February 5, 2025 12800 RAVINE PARKWAY SOUTH COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 COUNCIL CHAMBER - 7:00 P.M 1. CALL TO ORDER The City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, Washington County, Minnesota, held a regular meeting on February 5, 2025, at Cottage Grove City Hall, 12800 Ravine Parkway. Mayor Bailey called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The audience, staff, and City Council Members stood and recited the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. ROLL CALL City Clerk Tammy Anderson called the roll: Mayor Bailey-Here; Council Member Clausen-Here; Council Member Garza-Here; Council Member Olsen-Absent; Council Member Thiede-Here. Also present: Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator; Tammy Anderson, City Clerk; Karla Bigham, Washington County Commissioner; Ryan Burfeind, Public Works Director; Zac Dockter, Parks and Recreation Director; Phil Jents, Communication Manager; Pete Koerner, Public Safety Director; Korine Land, City Attorney-LeVander, Gillen & Miller, PA; Gretchen Larson, Economic Development Director; Brenda Malinowski, Finance Director; Emily Schmitz, Community Development Director; Dan Starry, Washington County Sheriff. 4. OPEN FORUM Mayor Bailey opened the Open Forum. As no one wished to address the Council, Mayor Bailey closed the Open Forum. 5. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Motion by Council Member Clausen to approve the agenda; second by Council Member Thiede. Motion carried: 4-0. 6. PRESENTATIONS A. Accacia Masonic Lodge No. 51 Donation and Presentation Staff Recommendation: Accept and approve the donation of six Fire Suppression tools ($6,000 value) from the Accacia Masonic Lodge No. 51. Mayor Bailey stated our Public Safety Director, Pete Koerner, will start us on this presentation. Mayor Bailey asked the Council Members to join him in front of the Council dais. Director Koerner said it’s an honor to be up here to accept this donation from the Masonic Lodge No. 51. We’re happy to have them back; they were here a year ago, when they donated six of the Fire Suppression devices. Their City Council Meeting February 5, 2025 Page 2 of 23 goal was to get those in all of the squads, so now we’re going to be up to 12 of them, as they’re donating six more tonight. They’re valued at $1,000 each. I can tell you right after the first donation came in to the Sheriff’s Office, I know one of the deputies went to a house fire, was able to deploy it, and so the fire caused way less damage, as the Fire Department was able to put it out. So, we really appreciate this donation. They will now give an introduction on it and what their lodge is about. Lloyd Cheney, the current Master of Accacia Lodge No. 51, the Masonic Lodge, gave the history of the Accacia Lodge: We’ve been in Old Cottage Grove since 1865, so, it was founded by a lot of the farmers in the area and a lot of veterans who came home right after the Civil War. So, the first and second Minnesota guys were founders within our Lodge. There’s lots of history in our Lodge; if you go past it, we’ve done a lot of renovations to that old building. It was the first Congregational Church from 1865 until 1965, and our Lodge was about a half mile down the road, tucked away down there. When the members of that church, some of whom were in the Lodge, purchased the building and the church built a new church, and we have been there ever since. So, this is our 160th year, and we’re in a 160-year-old building, which is pretty darn cool. Master Cheney said without further ado, he introduced Brother Mitch Boren, Brother Rich Purcell, Brother Jeff Lennartson, and said we’d have more guys here, but this is a Scottish Rite night, so many of our guys are over in St. Paul tonight. The FST (Fire Suppression Tool), this is the device itself, and it comes in a case and it can be deployed so a police officer or a first responder will come and maybe see smoke in a structure, a fire, or whatever, and there’s a pin device here; you clip it, pull the pin, and you toss it into the structure, in the fire, and it will go from basically 1000 degrees down to below the flashpoint in a matter of seconds. It is not CO2, it’s safe for all humans and animals in the building; in fact, there was a house in St. Paul Park, I think it was last February, and there was a save, and they saved the animals in the building. So, of course, the structure itself will not burn down as the Fire Department will get there to extinguish the remaining fire. Master Cheney stated this program was first started by a Minnesota Grand Lodge and Minnesota Masonic Charities. These devices cost right around $1,000 each, and the Lodge puts forth a portion of that money and the Minnesota Masonic Charities and Grand Lodge puts in the rest, and then we donate to our local City Fire and Police. So, with that, this will make it 12 devices, and we’ll try to get all your squad cars outfitted going forward; we’ll do one more final donation, if we can, by the end of the year, that would be great. We’ll see where our fundraising is, but we do a lot of fundraising throughout the year, with our events: The Spaghetti Dinner, which you guys come to, our Pancake Breakfasts, which are wonderful, and we also do a raffle every year, Sportsmen & More raffle, where we take a bunch of stuff and raffle it off, and that contributes to our funds. Also, we raise money for our scholarships, so, there are scholarships that are available for local students in the high schools. Minnesota Masonic Charities also puts out scholarships, not only for new postsecondary options, but other education as well. So, if you’re a young person or you have young people at home or people looking for scholarships, ask the City Council; I’ll leave some of my cards and you can contact me, and I will point you in the right direction. Master Cheney said I think I covered all that and I covered this, so I will make the presentation, and maybe we can get a photo there. He said thank you, we love the community, we love being here, and if you’re looking for a good Pancake Breakfast, it will be on Easter Saturday, the Saturday before Easter, come out. We’re also doing an Easter Egg Hunt for the kids, and if it’s not nice weather, we’ll have it inside the Lodge. Our picnic is August 19, I believe, and you’re all welcome to come to our picnic and our Spaghetti Dinner in the fall. Mayor Bailey said fantastic, so let’s give them a round of applause for this amazing donation. Everyone applauded. Mayor Bailey said as he just mentioned, their Spaghetti Dinner is absolutely amazing; I don't know what it is in the recipe, but it is very, very good. So, I think basically all of us, well, we have our new Council Member, so that’ll be coming, so we’ll do that. Again, on behalf of all of us, our citizens and everybody, I mean, it’s groups like yourself that make this community an amazing place to live and work and play. And the fact is that if we didn’t have some of these types of devices, obviously, we’d have homes like the one you referenced in St. Paul Park that could in essence burn to the ground or injure people. These are some neat, new devices that will obviously get in City Council Meeting February 5, 2025 Page 3 of 23 all of our squads at some point. I again just want to thank you from all of us in the City of Cottage Grove and our Public Safety teams, Police, Fire, and EMS, and of course, the Council. Thank you! Everyone applauded. Motion by Council Member Thiede to accept the donation of the Fire Suppression Tools from the Accacia Masonic Lodge No. 51; second by Council Member Garza. Motion carried: 4-0. B. Police Officer Badge Pinning and Swearing-In Ceremony Staff Recommendation: Recognize Officers Lauden Rinzel, Officer Anna Weiss, Officer Marshal Freeman, and Officer Tyler Harris. Mayor Bailey stated Director Koerner will start this and then Jennifer Levitt, our City Administrator, will be administering the oath. He stated I want to acknowledge that Karla Bigham, our Washington County Commissioner, and Dan Starry, Washington County Sheriff and some of his group are also here this evening, so we want to welcome them to Cottage Grove. Director Koerner stated I actually wrote a couple notes this time because this is just a monumental thing for us to bring on our four new officers; when I say new, they’re not brand new, it’s been a year to get them to this point, but I’m really proud to just stand in front of you to introduce our four officers here. We also have three additional officers who started last week in the Academy and three C.S.O. candidates. These four officers went through their field training and the Officer Academy. Sergeant Lindeen was going to talk tonight, but she just said in the interest of time, she asked me just to mention that. Each of these four officers were sworn in on their first day; however, this is our time to celebrate them successfully completing our Police Academy and field training. Each of these officers is already out on their own and making contributions to the organization. As their family members tonight pin their badge, I just want to take this moment to remind each of us what this badge represents: This badge represents our vision of the Cottage Grove Police Department and our Core Values. This badge represents the trust that the public has in us, it represents our commitment to the profession and our community. Each of these officers display our Core Values of Integrity, Humility, Respect, Courage, Honor, Professionalism, Initiative, and Wellness. This badge is just more of a reminder of that. As police officers, you also represent the Public Safety Department, our entire profession, our City organization, and most importantly, the community. With that, I’m going to do one introduction at a time, we’ll get each of them up here, and then have the family come up and pin the badge. Director Koerner said we’ll start with Officer Lauden Rinzel, if you’ll come over by the City Administrator. Director Koerner said I do have to admit I did play around with your bios, some of yours were very short, but I’ll just do brief introductions. I’m especially proud of this one, as Lauden grew up in Cottage Grove, attended Park High School where he met his wife, Jasmine. Lauden grew up in our law enforcement family as well, as his father, Greg, has served over 30 years and is currently our Deputy Director. I can tell you Lauden earned this position, his dad actually has taken another role so he didn’t supervise him, so that’s pretty neat. Lauden started his career as a Reserve Officer for Cottage Grove, and then he also transitioned to being a Community Service Officer (C.S.O.) with us; while doing that, he also worked parttime with Woodbury Public Safety as a C.S.O. while he attended law enforcement school. Lauden was hired as a Washington County deputy, about five years ago. He worked in patrol, he was a S.W.A.T. member, and a Field Training Officer. He had a great experience there, but he returned home, so we’re grateful for that. Lauden is currently our Traffic Enforcement Officer, so I’m sure you’ve seen him on some of those social media posts. Lauden has his two children here and his wife, Jasmine, will pin his badge after our City Administrator administers the oath. Administrator Levitt asked Lauden to raise his right hand and repeat the oath after her, which he did. Administrator Levitt congratulated Officer Rinzel, and everyone applauded. Officer Rinzel shook hands with Mayor Bailey and the Council Members. Officer Rinzel’s wife, Jasmine, pinned his badge. Everyone applauded and a photo was taken. City Council Meeting February 5, 2025 Page 4 of 23 Director Koerner said next we have Officer Anna Weiss. Anna is another officer who grew up in a law enforcement family. Anna grew up in Forest Lake and graduated from Forest Lake Hight School; Anna knew, I think even during high school, what her passion was, and she went on to attend Alexandria Technical and Community College. While she was there at school, she was hired here as a C.S.O. and committed many, many weekends to work as a C.S.O. with us. When she completed her schooling, she continued as a C.S.O. She went through our process, was selected, and she began last year on February 5, 2024, so a year ago. Anna also enjoys spending time with her family, being active, and traveling. So, congratulations, and in a moment we’ll have your dad, retired Captain Greg Weiss, come up to pin your badge. Administrator Levitt asked Anna to raise her right hand and repeat the oath after her, which she did. Administrator Levitt congratulated Officer Weiss and everyone applauded. Anna shook hands with Mayor Bailey and all of the Council Members. Anna’s dad, retired Captain Greg Weiss, pinned Anna’s badge, after which everyone applauded. Director Koerner said I’m going to go off script a little bit because when I asked Officer Marshal Freeman for a bio, it was like, I’ve been a cop, let’s do this. So, like I said, he’s a man of few words, but Marshal is also local; he grew up in St. Paul Park, and he graduated from Park High School. After school, Marshal joined the United States Air Force and did eight years of active duty, and part of that time you were a K9 handler as well. After that, he came back to Cottage Grove. Marshal is currently a member of the Air National Guard. Prior to coming to us, he worked three years with the Minnesota State Patrol, in the East Metro. I know the poor guy, every call he went on or when on coffee breaks, he was heavily recruited, even a neighbor I think pressured him to come on board. So, again, like I said, Marshal is a man of few words, but when I talk about our Core Values, specifically, humility, here’s just a quick story: As a member of the Lions Club, I had someone track me down, one of the coaches at Kingston, and he said hey, one of your cops showed up. And I’m like, oh, gosh, what did we do, that was my first thought. One of your officers, turned out it was Marshal, stopped by a soccer practice with 12-year-olds, and he played with them for about 15 minutes. I think they scored quite a few times on you, but they definitely wanted to pass that along. When I saw Marshal in the hallway, I told him, hey, I got this nice report, and he’s like, yeah, that’s why I came here, Chief, as he wants to do community engagement. So, we’re really excited to have you. I hope I get this right because I asked, who’s pinning? And he’s like, yeah, the wife and kids will be here, too. But Marshal’s wife, Olivia, will be pinning your badge, and your children will be coming up as well. So, with that, I’ll turn it over to the City Administrator. Administrator Levitt asked Marshal to raise his right hand and repeat the oath after her, which he did. Administrator Levitt congratulated Officer Freeman, and everyone applauded. Marshal shook hands with Mayor Bailey and the City Council Members. Officer Freeman’s wife, Olivia, pinned his badge, along with their three children, after which everyone applauded. A photo was taken of Officer Freeman and his family. Director Koerner said last, but not least, I tell you if we could contain his energy, we’d solve the energy crisis, right, Tyler? I’m proud to introduce Officer Tyler Harris. Tyler was raised in New Richmond, WI, and is a graduate of New Richmond High School. He began his career in law enforcement as a Police Explorer with the Washington County Sheriff's Office. His commitment to public service continued when he enlisted in the United States Marine Corps, where he currently serves as a military police officer in the Marine Corps Reserves. In May, 2022, Tyler joined the City of Cottage Grove as a C.S.O. while pursuing his education at Century College where he earned an Associate Degree in Law Enforcement. During his studies, he also served as a firefighter for the City of New Richmond, as a C.S.O. of the Washington County Sheriff's Office, and he further advanced his training by completing his skills program at Rasmussen University. In June 2024, he began his role as a police officer with our department. So, he is one of those unique candidates that we wanted him so bad, we hired him when he was finishing his training. He started with the Academy right away, and then once he became POST eligible, he started as a police officer. So, he’s another one that didn’t listen to his family, as his dad’s a proud Commander with Washington County. So, we have three that didn’t listen to their parents tonight. With that, I’ll turn it over to Administrator Levitt. City Council Meeting February 5, 2025 Page 5 of 23 Administrator Levitt asked Tyler to raise his right hand and repeat the oath after her, which he did. Administrator Levitt congratulated Officer Harris, and everyone applauded. Tyler shook hands with Mayor Bailey and the Council Members. Tyler’s mother, Heather, and his father, Tim, were present; his father, Tim, pinned Tyler’s badge, after which everyone applauded. A photo was taken of Officer Harris with his parents. Director Koerner said we’d like to get a photo of all the officers who were just sworn in, along with their families, with all the Cottage Grove officers in the backdrop. Multiple photos were taken. Mayor Bailey said all right, let’s have another round of applause for our new officers here in Cottage Grove, and everyone applauded. He said thank you, there are a lot of proud parents and family members here tonight. C. February 2025: Black History Month Staff Recommendation: Proclaim February as Black History Month. Mayor Bailey stated February 2025 is Black History Month, and I’ve asked Council Member Clausen to read the proclamation this evening. Council Member Clausen read aloud the proclamation. Motion by Council Member Garza to proclaim February 2025 as Black History Month; second by Council Member Thiede. Motion carried: 4-0. 7. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve the January 8, 2025, City Council Special Meeting Minutes. B. Approve the January 22, 2025, City Council Regular Meeting Minutes. C. Approve the November 18, 2024, Public Services Commission Meeting Minutes. D. Accept and place on file the minutes from the December 16, 2024, Planning Commission meeting. E. Approve the issuance of rental licenses to the properties listed in the attached table. F. Authorize executing a service agreement for towing and impounding of vehicles with South East Towing, Inc. G. Receive the 2025 State Fuel Contract pricing under State Contract Number 263096. H. Authorize Public Works to advertise and sell surplus property on Cranky Ape and/or MNBid. I. Approve Change Order #5 for the Utility and Engineering Building in the amount of $23,993.66. J. Authorize service agreement with Oertel Architects for the Ice Arena lobby/office programming and concept design services. K. Adopt Resolution 2025-012 awarding the 2025 Hamlet Pond Maintenance project to the quote supplied by New Look Contracting, Inc. in the amount of $97,592.00, and the appropriate officials are hereby authorized to sign all necessary documents to effectuate these actions. L. Adopt Resolution 2025-011, providing for the sale of the $10,000,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2025A. M. 1) Adopt Resolution 2025-013 approving the Final Plat for Prairie Dunes 1st Addition. 2) Approve the Prairie Dunes 1st Addition Development Agreement with Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC, with minor modifications as approved by the City Attorney. 3) Adopt Resolution 2025-014 approving the Prairie Dunes 1st Addition Development Plans dated December 13, 2024, prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc., subject to final approval by the City Engineer in writing. None of the Council Members wished to pull any Items on the Consent Agenda for further comment and/or discussion. Motion by Council Member Thiede to approve the Consent Agenda; second by Council Member Clausen. Motion carried: 4-0. City Council Meeting February 5, 2025 Page 6 of 23 8. APPROVE DISBURSEMENTS A. Approve disbursements for the period of 1-17-2025 through 1-30-2025 in the amount of $2,511,892.70. Motion by Council Member Garza to approve disbursements; second by Council Member Clausen. Motion carried: 4-0. 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS - None. 10. BID AWARDS - None. 11. REGULAR AGENDA - None. 12. COUNCIL COMMENTS AND REQUESTS Council Member Garza said I do see that we’re having a Fish Fry at River Oaks on February 28, so I think everybody should get down there and enjoy some great fish. Other than that, you guys have a wonderful week. Council Member Thiede said well, I guess, sticking with my general theme of Strawberry Fest and so forth, there is a first Bingo fundraiser at River Oaks on February 22nd at 11:00 a.m. Other information is available online at strawberryfest.com. Other than that, I’m good. Mayor Bailey said I was just going to real quick say that I’ve seen the picture of the button for this year, and it looks amazing, by the way. I know you talked about it in the past, but I’ve seen it out on social media now, so whoever designed it did a really good job. It’s a fun button for this year, fantastic. Council Member Clausen said everybody loves software upgrades, right? We all look forward to those. Well, over the last week or several months, our Finance Department and Utility Billing people have been working diligently to get a new utility software system up and running. I know that takes a lot of people, it takes Finance, IT, the Utility people to get everything working on time. Throughout the change, I know that staff has been receiving like upwards of, just last week, 500 phone calls from citizens asking about, having questions on how to navigate the new system. It’s a lot of time, it’s a lot to ask the staff to do, and it seems to be going pretty well from what I hear, so a shout out to the staff and everyone that worked so hard on that. Thank you. Mayor Bailey replied fantastic, and that is true. The great news about that is it’s the questions were more about do I need to reset up my account? Obviously, the answer was yes; so, if you’re watching, that is the answer, but nice job in the transition. Council Member Garza said I can say that setting up your account is extremely fast and easy, it takes a couple of minutes, not a problem. You can pay your bill, set it on automatic payment, and forget about it. Mayor Bailey said it’s funny because that’s, I asked my wife the same question, I said, oh, by the way, did you know you have to do this? And she said of course I knew. And I’m like okay, as long as it’s done! Mayor Bailey said I don’t have anything else to add for this evening at this point. Council Member Thiede said I guess we can mention, I guess there’s a Blizzard Bash down at Ravine Park, and that’s on February 15th, so that’s not this weekend, but the weekend after. And we might even have, if everything comes down from the sky on Saturday and so forth, we might even have some snow to take advantage of the free use of snowshoes and sleds, and you can strap on the skis and things like that. So, that’s on February 15th, from 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. at the Ravine Park. Mayor Bailey said awesome, thank you. City Council Meeting February 5, 2025 Page 7 of 23 Mayor Bailey said the next item on our agenda are workshops, which are open to the public, so we’ll be going into the Training Room. There are three items on our workshop this evening: The Minnesota Law Enforcement Support Office (LESO) Participation, the Police Annual Use of Force Report, and the Police and Fire 5-Year Strategic Plan Update. We do not have any workshops closed to the public this evening, so we won’t be adjourning in here, we’ll adjourn in the Training Room. So, everybody have a great evening, and we’ll see if we get that snow this weekend. Take care, everyone. 13. WORKSHOPS - OPEN TO PUBLIC - TRAINING ROOM A. MN Law Enforcement Support Office (MN_LESO) Participation Staff Recommendation: Authorize Cottage Grove Public Safety to continue participating in the Minnesota Law Enforcement Support Office program and the State Plan of Operations (SOP). Mayor Bailey said Sergeant Bailey will be speaking on this. Sergeant Bailey said so, if you’re not aware, we are still part of the Minnesota LESO program, and we’ve been a part of that now for a few years, I don’t even know how many years, probably at least four or five years. If you’re not sure of what the LESO program is, ultimately, it’s excess equipment that the military has and they no longer use or need. Before just getting rid of it, they open it up to law enforcement agencies that take part in their program and allow us to get equipment from them. That helps us save a lot on costs and ultimately allows us to do our jobs safer, easier, and give us different products, such as medical equipment and stuff as well. So, it definitely saves us the costs. In May, 2022, the Executive Order was signed, pretty much giving requirements that we have to follow in order to be a part of this program. One of them, obviously, is an annual notice given to the City Council, which is us telling them that we intend to acquire controlled property from Federal sources, and then we also have to give notice to the community that we’re going to acquire controlled property. Along with other things, such as community engagement and input, we have to do training on the products that we receive from LESO, documentation, as we’re held accountable for all of that product. So, our department obviously made a policy and amended our policy and practices to abide by this Executive Order. Some of the LESO program requirements are we have to conduct annual training on all of the controlled property, and we also have to have security and accountability measures to ensure that it is just being used for law enforcement purposes only. We are not allowed to sell, trade, exchange, use it for personal use, any of that equipment, and we cannot transfer it to another agency unless they are part of the program; it has to actually be transferred through the program to them. We also must do an annual inventory every single year, and if anything is lost, stolen, or broken, we have 24 hours to report that to the LESO. We also have our MRAP, our armored vehicle, which is from LESO, and we have to do annual training on that, which we do. So, there are two types of property that we get from the LESO program: The first is not controlled property, so, it’s like the AEDs and medical supplies, rescue equipment, clothing, tools, and what have you; we receive that equipment and it’s pretty much transferred to us, after a year, ownership is then fully given to us. So, LESO, and the military, does not maintain ownership of that after one year. The controlled property is different, however. The Department of Defense always retains ownership of that; so, it is really just a loan to us, and that’s going to include the armored vehicles, robots, the night vision that we have. Over the past four years, we’ve acquired multiple items, controlled and not controlled, a lot of rescue equipment and medical supplies, AEDs, First Aid kits, clothing, different protective equipment, masks; and then we have also received in the past our armored vehicle, this is a controlled property, as are armored vehicles, ballistic protection, robots, and night vision. So, we currently have those items of controlled property. City Council Meeting February 5, 2025 Page 8 of 23 Honestly, us getting all of this stuff, it pretty much allows us to be ready and prepared if some type of a disaster would happen, we would have the medical equipment, supplies, and it allows us to be more safe with the armored vehicle on these high distress, very dangerous calls that we might be going on. So, most important, LESO saves us a lot of money. The amount of money that we have saved on this equipment, I don’t even know what that number’s at anymore, but it is very high. So, we’ve definitely had a lot of cost savings because we’ve been a part of this program. Sergeant Bailey said so, this is a bunch of property that we have obtained from the LESO program; again, it’s not just our armored vehicle or stuff for our rifles, or our night vision. It’s ladders, ropes, rescue equipment, just a bunch of cold-weather gear, different types of clothing, backpacks, tools that have been utilized for our department, over at the HERO Center. So, we have obtained a lot of equipment that we definitely do use. We obviously engage with the community multiple times throughout the year, at different events. And then, obviously, we tell our patrol officers please try to engage with the community as much as you can while we’re out patrolling. We do that, and we talk about our MRAP vehicle at community events, and we do demos, and we answer their questions and talk to the community about it. We ultimately have a lot of support from the community with all of the items that we have obtained through LESO. So, ultimately we’re asking the Council to authorize us to continue to participate in the LESO program, and then also authorize acquisition of controlled property, including firearms, accessories, optic sights, night vision, and so on. Mayor Bailey asked Council if they had any questions at all at this point. Council Member Garza said that sounds like an amazing program, for one, for what we get. So, I do have a question, and maybe I missed it, so I apologize if you’ve already answered this; it sounds like are you, are we purchasing these things at like a deeply-discounted rate, or is it just given to us? Sergeant Bailey replied no, we’re not; yep, they’re just given to us. Most costs, a lot of times, sometimes it depends on the item, like if it ships, it might just be like a shipping cost. But other than that, everything through the LESO program is free, we’re not having to pay anything to that program to obtain these items. Council Member Garza asked so, how do you; is it like an online shopping thing, you choose and bid on what you want, and if it’s available, you get it, or? Sergeant Bailey replied yeah, so, it is an online program, LESO program, that we have access to, and you can go in that program, and they’ll show a list of things that are available in different locations. So, it’s spread out among different military bases, actually, all over the world. But it’s all spelled out, and you can go in there, and you can search specific things that you’re looking for, a specific item that we’re in need of, and then you put in a request. Ultimately, a lot of times it comes to first come, first served. But like with the Department of Defense, you can always comment, say we actually do need this. So, different, like Federal agencies, they get a little more priority over us on all the items, but then ultimately, it’s a waiting list, and finally, it will be like yes, you got approved to take this. Council Member Garza said thank you. And maybe this is something that you may not be able to answer, but just a question; with everything, would this be something that would be affected by like the Federal order, by different departments, with this program? Is it something that would be affected that way, does anybody know? Administrator Levitt replied, well, the thing is, all Federal programs are seeming to be affected in some way, shape, or form until, I mean, it may not be at this moment, but this program may change. So, we’ll just keep on using it. Mayor Bailey told Captain Brad Petersen to go ahead. Captain Petersen said I’d like to comment on that, too. So, the Executive Order, that Nick referenced in 2022, was really restrictive, with the number of agencies participating to get equipment, there were all kinds of requirements on as a deterrent, to discourage departments from participating. In addition to that, they really restrict the amount of product that was servicing this program. So, over the last two years, we’ve gotten almost nothing from the program, to the point that we’ve stopped shopping, pretty much; we just stopped looking at the website. My guess is that with the new President and new leadership team, that will probably change, and we’re hoping that that pipeline will open up again. Just as a point of clarity, in the last five years, we’ve gotten in excess City Council Meeting February 5, 2025 Page 9 of 23 of $10 million of equipment from LESO. So, that’s been a huge asset to departments in the community, a huge cost savings. These are things that we otherwise would’ve had to pay for or gave us an opportunity to get things that we never could’ve afforded. So, it’s been a really good opportunity for us. Council Member Thiede said like an armored vehicle. Mayor Bailey replied yes. But one of the things I’ll just mention to you, Council Member Garza, when we first went through this program, what you’re referencing is there’s, if you think about what was going on, what? Four years ago, when was it? Captain Petersen replied it started in 2019, I believe. Mayor Bailey said, okay, so there was kind of this wave of demilitarizing, as they tried to say, the Police Departments, whereas if you even just heard what Nick was sharing, is yes, there are important pieces, like AEDs, clothing, all that kind of stuff. So, we’ve always said as a Council in the past, we were 100% supportive of continuing with the program, even though they’d tighten it up. Like Brad just said it, my comment was going to be I would expect a change by Executive Order, that’s probably going to free it up and loosen it up a little bit more, just because of all these other ones that have been out there. Council Member Thiede said I don't know, he’s kind of ticking a lot of people off. Mayor Bailey replied, well, I don’t think this one; I mean, the general public, most of the public isn’t even aware of this program, to be frank with you. But I absolutely think if he does loosen it up, it’s a benefit for us. Council Member Garza said either way, either they do or don’t, I mean, then something else comes up. You just keep on shoppin’ and you’ll find something. Council Member Clausen said thanks for that, thanks for letting us know. Anyway, what my question was, does that program or does a similar program exist but on the Fire side? Fire Chief Jon Pritchard replied yeah, there’s something, I even looked into their portal, but there was a program, but it’s very limited. I’ve used it at previous Fire Departments, I’ve looked at it, but it’s just not as robust as the City needs; like medical supplies are hard to find, and I think it’s kind of probably layered down, but it’s something that did exist, I just don’t know for sure if it still exists. Deputy Fire Chief Nick Arrigoni replied so, it’s the exact same program. The problem is the pecking order is tiered; so, it’s Federal customers first, then Law Enforcement, and then Fire, and then there’s NTO below that. So, by the time Fire gets to pick, all the good stuff’s gone, generally. Council Member Clausen said we could buy something for them. Mayor Bailey said I was going to say that, well, we are kind of a joint; Council Member Clausen said we’re a Public Safety Department. Mayor Bailey said good point. Council Member Clausen said thank you. Mayor Bailey asked so, do you actually need a recommendation this evening for this? Administrator Levitt replied yes. Director Koerner replied we need two separate authorizations. Mayor Bailey said, so, if one of you Council Members would like to make the first motion. Council Member Garza made a motion to authorize the Cottage Grove Police Department to continue participation in the Minnesota LESO Program; second by Council Member Thiede. Motion carried: 4-0. Council Member Clausen made a motion to authorize the acquisition of controlled property, including firearms, accessories, and optics, night vision, and robots; second by Council Member Thiede. Motion carried: 4-0. Sergeant Bailey said thank you. B. Police - Annual Use of Force Report Staff Recommendation: Receive the 2024 Annual Use of Force Report. Sergeant Bailey said we do thank you, Mayor and Council and City Administrator, City staff, for allowing us to be with you tonight and share our 2024 Annual Use of Force Report. I’ll go over all the Use of Force data from last year, and then I’ll also cover some of our S.W.A.T. data from last year as well. City Council Meeting February 5, 2025 Page 10 of 23 I’ll let you read through Chief Koerner’s message, but ultimately this report just shows the accountability that we hold on ourselves to make sure that what we’re doing is effective and working and safe, and that we really focus hard on training and making sure that we’re up to date on all the latest policies and procedures and Best Practices. Our Police Department’s Mission Statement and Vision Statement again talk again about how we invest in all sorts of safety, wellness, and training. We employ the best equipment, technology, and practices in our organization. So, in the Cottage Grove Police Department, we have a culture of excellence within our organization, and it’s not just one thing that allows that; it takes multiple things to create that culture, and it starts with clear and effective policies, being transparent, engaging with the community, holding ourselves accountable, and we have a good, strong oversight of our department and our officers. And then it kind of goes again in investing in our training because that is the best equipment for our officers so they can do their job well and safely, for themselves and the community. And it also entails collecting that data, right? I’ll get into that with our Use of Force database, and analyzing that data so we can constantly change. At the center of all that, it ultimately creates that culture of just continuing to learn, you’re never too old to learn something new. So, we don’t want to get stagnant, we want to keep learning and improving, and we ultimately just have that commitment to always find a way for our department and ourselves to improve. Use of Force Report: Use of Force kind of starts with that officer, that officer is going to believe he’s probably going to be involved in a Use of Force, or immediately after a Use of Force incident happens, they’re required to notify their supervisor on duty; and then they will complete a narrative of the incident, but then they create a separate Use of Force Report. When that sergeant or supervisor gets down there, they’re going to assess for injuries, coordinating medical aid, whether it’s for the subject or the officer or anyone that’s involved, and coordinate that medical treatment for them. That sergeant is going to gather as much information as possible: They’re going to interview the police officer, kind of get their side, as far as what happened; but then they’re going to go and try to convince the subject to talk with them, talk with the subject to figure out their viewpoint on what happened, along with any other witnesses that might have seen what took place. And then they’re going to make sure everything, all the evidence, is collected properly. When they go back to the Police Department, they are going to wait for that officer to complete that narrative for that incident and that Use of Force Report. The supervisor is going to review both of those and ultimately make sure that it’s documented properly, everything that needs to be in there, and making sure it’s accurate. Once that sergeant reviews that Use of Force Report, they really have two options: They can either read it and say no, it’s missing things or we need more clarity on this, and they can send that back to the officer and talk with that officer. If everything is good, they will then push it forward to our Use of Force Review Committee. Use of Force Review Committee: Our Use of Force Review Committee consists of four people: Two sergeants (myself, as I’m in charge of and am a lead instructor for our Use of Force program, and Sergeant Lindeen, who is the lead instructor for our firearms program training); and then two officers, one from our Investigations division and one from Patrol, who are also instructors within our department. We meet quarterly, and we review every Use of Force incident that happened that quarter. In this review, we read the Use of Force Report, and then we will actually go into the incident and read the incident report, and then watch any body cam videos, any squad videos, any audio that’s available. We’re going to be looking for making sure everything went the way it should that we trained for, making sure there are no policy violations. Once we review everything, we have three options that we can do as a Use of Force Review Committee: 1) We can say it’s reasonable and within policy, and then we close out the case and it’s good to go, and the data is in our database. 2) If it’s reasonable and within policy, but we might have seen something that maybe is something that we need to work on in training, or maybe it’s a piece of equipment that wasn’t functioning the way its supposed to, or maybe there’s something in our policy, so maybe we need to look at that policy. So, it’s still within policy, so it’s still reasonable, but then ultimately, we’ll check that, it gets closed out, and we will be documenting things that maybe we need to talk about or work on in training and talk to the officers about. 3) If we do believe that there’s a policy violation, we can refer it to our Command Staff. When we do that, the Command gets notified, we’ll sit City Council Meeting February 5, 2025 Page 11 of 23 down and talk about it, and then they can review it as well, and make a determination if there was some type of policy violation. Also, in the Review Committee, we look at all the data, we analyze the data, we collect it throughout that year, and we use it to kind of modify our training plans for the next year or even sometimes immediately in that year or after the quarter; we modify the training plans to make sure we are addressing any type of problem or issue we might have run into. 2024 Use of Force Statistics: This is kind of a snippet of what our database looks like once all the numbers are in, and I’ll talk about a lot of the numbers here. We’ll look at our 2024 Use of Force statistics: There are three lines here, the blue line, which is our population; the orange line, which is Calls for Service; and the gray line at the bottom is our crime. So, from 2019, you’re looking at that blue line, our population, and it’s increasing. With that, you’ll see that our Calls for Service volume is also increasing, with a big increase in 2022 and 2023. The interesting thing about this is if you look at that gray line, our crimes are actually decreasing. I think multiple things go into that, on why it’s decreasing despite having higher population and higher Calls for Service; I think one of the main ones is just our officers feel that they have enough support from their Council and their administration that they’re not afraid to go out there and do proactive police work, and hold people accountable as they are committing the crimes. And word of that travels fast of cities that are not allowing people to get away with crime in their cities. An example I like to use is we’ll talk about pursuits, I’ll talk about pursuits here in a little bit, but we have multiple times been involved in pursuits, we end up getting the person stopped, and we take them into custody; the first thing they say to us is, “What are you doing? You’re not allowed to pursue us.” Well, no, we are, we are allowed to, and we’re going to hold you accountable. So, that words travels fast among people who like to go to cities and commit crimes, that hey, don’t go there because if you get caught, they actually hold you accountable. Council Member Garza said it also shows our neighbors, just for 2024, that we have that many calls, so when people see something, they’re saying something, and that’s really awesome. Sergeant Bailey said last year, we had 41,160 Calls for Service, and out of those Calls for Service, we had 90 Use of Force incidents. So, if you kind of look at this graph, it goes all the way to 2017, you see that Calls for Service going up, but what you actually see is the Use of Force stays relatively the same; within 2024, less than ¼% of our Calls for Service resulted in a Use of Force. So, that’s a positive variable number and that’s a good number, and there’s a lot that plays a factor in that. I think the biggest factor is our training, our tactics that we train our officers with, and especially deescalation. We try our best to deescalate the situation to get the subject to comply so we don’t have to use force, as force is the last thing we want to have to use. So, we’ll go above and beyond and try to get to them in time to comply, it’s a lot safer for us and the community to do so. Pursuits: This is a graph of pursuits. You can see in 2022, we had 32 pursuits, and then in 2023, we had 19, and in 2024, we had 15 pursuits. So, literally, half the amount of pursuits. Again, why that number dropped so drastically I think basically is because of a couple factors: 1) That word of mouth is going around, like hey, Cottage Grove will pursue you, and they will hold you accountable. 2) We have adjusted and adopted different training methods to try to not even allow the person to flee in a vehicle, with blocking the vehicle; waiting for them to park somewhere and then going in and blocking them in so that they can’t even have the chance to run from us. This graph shows all the different Uses of Force that we have or do and the frequency they happen. If you look at the left side of this graph, this is kind of a low level of force, the Escort Hold. It’s really just grabbing someone and holding them by the arm and escorting them somewhere; 61 times we had force where he used the Escort Hold, and then the other two are your grappling and your takedown, to take someone down, or wrestling them down to the ground. But if you look at the center, where you’re starting to get to like the Less Lethal options, like the PepperBall, the Taser, 40-mm. impact, even our K9s. You’ll see the orange is just displayed, but we didn’t even deploy any of that, that’s just being displayed or threatened use to the subject. If you look at the actual amount of times we actually deployed, for the PepperBall it was three; for Taser, it was only two; K9 apprehension, we didn’t have any apprehensions with our K9, the threat of our K9 being there itself was enough to get the subject to comply. And I want to touch on the chemical restraint just because I know we talked about this last year. So, we did have six of them last year, where our medics had to chemically restrain someone just because it wasn’t safe for us to transport them or keep fighting with them; so, our medics, if they feel it’s necessary to use chemical sedation, it City Council Meeting February 5, 2025 Page 12 of 23 is six times, but a lot of that is still coming from the group homes. I know last year we had to keep chemically sedating an individual multiple times, the same individual in multiple incidents, resulted in chemical sedation, which caused those numbers to go up. So, we had six of them, and, again, a lot of that has happened because we are dealing with someone in a mental health crisis, and a lot of times they’re from one of the group homes. Mayor Bailey asked is he the one that’s gone now? Is that the one that’s in? Sergeant Bailey replied yes. Captain Petersen said, so, that particular individual is gone, but we’re still having issues at the same group home with different subjects at the group home. Council Member Garza asked do we feel that the new social worker situation, is that maybe going to help with some of this here, with like sending them to situations? Are they planning on going to situations, or are they just going to? Captain Petersen replied generally, a social worker comes into play after we’ve stabilized the situation. So, they’re not going to deal with somebody who is acutely in crisis. We have to go in there and control the scene, which oftentimes will result in a Use of Force or something. But then, in the long-term plan, the social worker definitely plays a role. Mayor Bailey said I don’t want to get off your slide stuff here, but my question is if we keep having problems with this particular group home, what options do we have? I mean, are there options out there that we can deal with? Captain Petersen replied so, other than that, we don’t have many options at this point. We did involve Child Protective Services last week, and they’re exploring their options. But, as you know, the State and the County control all licensing and really, the City has very few options. Mayor Bailey said I mean, is that something we can or I can talk with like our County Commissioner or Jennifer can? Captain Petersen replied this one’s licensed through Hennepin County. Mayor Bailey replied oh, this one’s through Hennepin County, which Captain Petersen confirmed. Captain Petersen said another thing that comes into play, too, is oftentimes these patients aren’t even residents of Washington County, they’re coming from often Dakota or Hennepin Counties and can be placed here in our group homes. So, that even further limits our options because we’re used to dealing with our own Social Services network. Mayor Bailey said okay. Captain Petersen said you know, Hennepin or Dakota County doesn’t really care if we have a problem here. Mayor Bailey said I just don’t like it. Administrator Levitt said I think the main reason the mayor’s bringing it up is when we met with the School District, they were very nervous about sending their kids to the bus stop near that specific place; Mayor Bailey said yes. And, so, they were wondering what action we could take in regards to that. So, the School District is feeling that. Mayor Bailey asked could we address that? Director Koerner replied we can put together more of a response; I mean, I’m on a first-name basis with half of the people in that neighborhood because I call them, you know? Mayor Bailey replied yeah, and I’ve gotten messages, and then it got brought up when we met with the School District. Director Koerner said I can put together a detailed response for them as to what we could do and everything. Mayor Bailey said I mean, I don’t blame them to be concerned with that kind of stuff going on there. Director Koerner said and Council Member Garza, just to speak to this one, also, as Captain Petersen said, that our social worker will deal with a lot of people in crisis, but to me, when I see this number that we only used 60 or 80 Uses of Force incidents, less than 1%, that’s amazing. And if I look back to 25 years ago, as a street officer, there was no such thing as deescalation, talking to people; I mean, it was right to the pepper spray or something, so, to me, these numbers are just amazing, that we rarely use force out there, so. Council Member Garza said I agree. City Council Meeting February 5, 2025 Page 13 of 23 Mayor Bailey said you know what’s interesting to me then, too, just to piggyback, if I’m the average Joe citizen, I don’t consider me, I don’t consider 61 Escorts to be a Use of Force. I’m thinking, like you said, that middle part is really, truly Use of Force, if you will, because you’re almost having to use a tool versus just guiding somebody into a squad. Director Koerner said and back in the day, you didn’t document if you handcuffed, but now we have to, that’s the way you document things. Sergeant Bailey replied yeah, so, that’s one thing we wanted to make sure, when we created this Use of Force Reporting, is that we count very low-level things as force, compared to a lot of other agencies; they wouldn’t count an Escort Hold as force. So, we count Escort Holds as force; when you put handcuffs on someone during a Use of Force incident, that’s actually smart during that incident that you put handcuffs on them, as that is technically a Use of Force event in that circumstance. Council Member Clausen said well, it shows that we are using force, but it shows we’re using appropriate force. So, those lower Escort Holds, those are important to capture. Injuries: Sergeant Bailey said, so, we also track injuries for subjects and officers. So, last year, we had eight injuries to subjects, which six of them were paramedic evals for minor injuries, and two of them were decontamination; so, it was either PepperBall or OC spray, something that the officer’s responsible for deconning them. And we had ten injuries to officers, and they were all minor injuries; they did not result in any lost work hours, there were no major injuries. If you look at that number again, especially for the subject injuries, I want to point this out: So, in 2019, we had 22 of them, and then it went down to 18, and then in 2021, it dropped to 8, and then it shot back up in 2022 to 15. And that’s what we use this data we collect for, like what’s causing these injuries? Is it a certain tactic, or is there a better tactic available for all of us to use? So, we adjust our training and adjust what our different techniques would be for wanting to take someone down or whatnot; and we started utilizing that and training on that more. And then, honestly, I believe it’s effective because now this last year we only had eight, and again, they were all minor injuries. And as far as the officers, we track it: If an officer got hit in the face, it’s a minor injury. If they have an injury that needs to be looked at, it needs to be bandaged up, that does count, and so, we only had ten for that. Captain Petersen said, if I may, I want to get back to why we had an increase in officer injuries. So, dating back a couple years ago, the trend began to start eliminating Taser use and putting more and more restrictions on OC and PepperBall and things like that. So, our option then is to go hands on every time we’re arresting somebody in a difficult environment and it’s going to result in bumps and bruises and scrapes; so, that’s likely why you see an increase in the number of injuries to our officers. It’s not good or bad, it is what it is, so that’s just kind of the hand we’re dealt. Council Member Garza said that makes sense, thank you. Sergeant Bailey said this slide kind of shows the residency; so, 52% of our Use of Force incidents happen with someone who did not live here in Cottage Grove, and 48% did live here in Cottage Grove. So, over half of our Use of Force incidents happened with someone who was not from here, but was coming to our City to commit a crime, and it ended up with us using force on them. So, we’re not just using force on the citizens of Cottage Grove, and a lot of times it’s people who are coming here from another city to commit a crime. And in the demographic here, they break it down for the race: So, 59.36% of Use of Force incidents involved those who were White, 26.74% were Black, and then we have Asian, 6.24%, Native American, 2.94%. So, that’s a similar proportion to the demographics here in Cottage Grove. So, we’re not using force on one race, more than another. Like I said, we had a total of 90 Use of Force incidents last year, 100% of them were deemed reasonable. Out of the 90, 87 were reasonable, within policy, and 3 were reasonable, within policy, but an opportunity to improve, whether it was tactics, training, or equipment needs. And then 0 cases were referred to Command for any type of policy violation. We did break our four-or-five-year streak of 0 Use of Force complaints, as we had 2 complaints regarding force last year, but they were unfounded. Sergeant Bailey said so, to try to sum all of that up, ultimately what this data is showing is force is seldomly used, and use of deadly force is extremely rare. Most of our incidents are resolved using our deescalation strategies and very minimal force. Low injury rates to subjects, low injury rates to officers, so it shows that our City Council Meeting February 5, 2025 Page 14 of 23 tactics are safe, our training is effective. Ultimately, our officers are using very good judgment, very good practices when dealing with subjects of an incident. With that, I’ll look at and give you an overview of what our training plan is for this upcoming year. So, every officer in our department will have a total of 90 hours of inhouse training. We will have 56 hours of just a monthly inservice, you can see that on the side, how that breaks down into different categories, how long we’ll be training, the amount of hours we train in each category. And those are just inhouse hours, that’s not including external training that officers put in for and go out and do outside our agency. This is just inside our agency itself. Equipment Policy Updates: So, this year, we are replacing our Taser X2s and going to the Taser 7s, and that transition will be happening in April, as Taser is not supporting their X2s anymore; so, we need to just update to their Taser 7. We amended our policy to give officers a choice on some of the less-lethal options that they carry, so they get a choice of the PepperBall Blast or the REPULS spray or REPULS safe, its like OC spray, just a different brand. It’s a lot easier for officers to decontaminate ourselves; so, they have to either carry PepperBall Blast or REPULS spray and they have to carry either a Taser or an asp baton. So, we amended our policy to give officers that option. Sergeant Bailey asked if there were any questions on the Use of Force database, and none were asked. Annual S.W.A.T. Report: Sergeant Bailey said I’ll just touch quickly on our Annual S.W.A.T. Report. As most of you are well aware, we are a multijurisdictional team compromised of members from departments from each city, along with the Washington County Sheriff's Office. So, there are 43 tactical officers on the team, 15 tech, 15 rotators, 5 paramedics, and a chaplain; out of those, Cottage Grove provides 6 tactical officers, 2 tech members, and 2 negotiators. We are a Tier 2 team because we do base that off the NTOA standards for a S.W.A.T. team; we’re a Tier 2 team, which shows that we are equipped and trained enough to do a hostage rescue mission, an active shooter mission, high-risk warrants, barricaded subjects, and civil unrest. In 2023, we had 64 missions for our S.W.A.T. team. As you can see, in 2019 it jumped to 43, and it’s kind of been going up since then. Around that time, as you’ll see on this next slide, a big reason for that is we were doing a lot more arrests with a quick response or were at differing events throughout the cities, all over the county. We’re doing a lot more P.R. events as well, getting out there and engaging the community. So, last year, we had 33 QRS events that we completed; again, that’s like here, with the Strawberry Fest, the Food Truck Festival, but eight cities all over the County are liking that. It’s just in case something were to happen, but it’s also good P.R., we’re out there talking with citizens in those communities, and they like seeing us, so it’s really taken off. So, we’ve been having to do a lot of those. We also had like barricaded subjects, we had two hostage rescue missions last year, and then a handful of warrant service missions as well. Director Koerner asked Sergeant Bailey if he could quickly comment on that. Cottage Grove, we were kind of the test community; do you remember about 4-or-5 years ago, we were like the first ones, we were like, we’re going to do a demo at the Strawberry Fest, and Woodbury and some of the Stillwater people were like, oh, my God, you’re going to bring S.W.A.T. to your event? Now, they’re all like we’re doing that at Woodbury Days, we’re doing that. So, I mean, it just speaks volumes, I think, for our community with how lucky we are that they support us. So, it’s like, why wouldn’t you have a K9 demo here? So, it’s just another reason, it’s great that we have the support. When we first started doing this, we were like how are people going to respond? It’s been incredible, so, thanks. Sergeant Bailey said, in 2024, we did zero no-knock warrant operations, and obviously, no knock and nighttime warrant service, they are only for the most dangerous situations where really no other safer options exist. Training: As far as members of our S.W.A.T. team, everyone received 190 annual training hours last year, that’s 10 hours each month, with the addition of a Spring inservice, which was hosted at our HERO Center, for 30 hours, and then a Fall weeklong inservice at Camp Ripley. This last year we transitioned over to McCoy for that 60 hours in that one week. We have our different specialties, our snipers and our breachers amongst our team; they have additional training each month, or quarterly, along with our negotiators and tech team, they are now training monthly as well. Again, that’s so we meet those NTOA standards. Plus, we send multiple different operators to different courses and conferences, so that’s additional training hours they get. Any new operators need to do our 40-hour basic S.W.A.T. course before they are allowed to be active on the team. City Council Meeting February 5, 2025 Page 15 of 23 Accomplishments: A big one was Washington County ordered our new BearCat, through Lenco, and it was supposed to be here soon-ish; however, Lenco has contracts with Federal agencies, and if a Federal agency comes in and requests armor, they get bumped to the top of the list. Well, a Federal agency came in and requested 140 or 170 BearCats, so we got pushed way down. So, we are behind, but we’re hoping still to have that new one by the end of this year. In the meantime, our current BearCat is getting refurbished, and that should actually be back in service here, hopefully by the end of this month or early next month if all still goes as planned. Sergeant Bailey said that is all I have. Does anyone have any questions? Mayor Bailey asked if Council had any questions; none were asked, but Council Member Garza said thank you, and Council Member Thiede said good job. Sergeant Bailey said thank you very much. Mayor Bailey said sounds good, thank you. C. Police and Fire - Five-Year Strategic Plan Updates Staff Recommendation: Receive the Police and Fire Five-Year Strategic Plan Update. Director Koerner said I’ll just start this before I turn it over to Captain Petersen. Since we were having the workshops to do this, LESO and Use of Force, I just thought this would be a good opportunity to give you; I know at the Strategic retreat we had a whole board on everything. So, in the interest of time, we’re not going to go through everything, but we’ve accomplished a lot. What I’m looking for out of this workshop, afterwards, is really how do you guys want feedback in the future? We do the quarterly reports, I know at the Strategic retreat, we kind of talked about some of the dashboard stuff that the Fire Chief provides. So, that’s what we’re kind of looking for is just a high level, highlight of a lot of our accomplishments. In the future, it’s not going to be a workshop every quarter or anything, but just to kind of show you what we’ve done. In the future, how do you want it reported back to you? We’re accomplishing a lot, and we want to get that out to you. So, with that, I’ll turn it over to Captain Petersen and then Chief Pritchard will give an update on Fire and EMS. Captain Petersen said as the Chief said, we’ve talked a lot about our Strategic Plan and our successes, and I do have a presentation prepared, but I would much rather have a discussion to your particular interests. So, if you have any particular interest after we talked about our Strategic Plan and you’ve seen our Annual Report, I’d be happy to do those now and we can just lay the focus on that. Otherwise, I’ll forge into my prepared presentation. Mayor Bailey said well, if you’re okay, why don’t you go ahead and do your prepared presentation, and then, I guess I’ll tell you in advance what I’m interested in on both sides is kind of where we’re at, from a staffing level. And then maybe whether you have it tonight or not, response times and things like that on the Fire side for medics. That’s probably the biggest interest that I have is just how are we doing with getting ourselves staffed where you want to be? Captain Petersen replied I have the answer to both questions. Council Member Thiede said and then again, the changes and so forth, because we just recently saw a lot of this and I know I’ve seen it more times than others, but. Director Koerner replied it’s still relatively new with the last year’s workshop and everything. Captain Petersen said there are a lot of changes, it’s a lot to digest, so, I know we’ve been throwing a lot at you. Pillars of our Strategic Plan: Captain Petersen said as you know, there are five pillars to our Strategic Plan: Core Functions, Community, Taking Care of our Officers, making sure that we have the Best Equipment and Practicing Technology, and then Preparing our Organization for Growth. So, these next few slides are going to organize our discussion under those pillars. Core Functions: We have a number of metrics to help us gauge success and progress in those Core Functions: Patrol Functions, Traffic Safety, Investigations, etc. You can see what some of those metrics are, and on a quarterly basis, you are getting that quarterly report that’s showing you all that data. As we get more and more data coming in, we’re starting to establish trends and be able to be more predictive and reach more conclusions based on that data, so, that’s been awesome. So, in the next slide, I’ll show you a few of the collect data that I think are most meaningful that were extracted from our Annual Report. There were two noteworthy actions that we focused on City Council Meeting February 5, 2025 Page 16 of 23 this last year that bear mentioning: We added the Traffic Safety Officer, we added a third K9, and added a Crime Scene Team just recently. Our All Hazardous Plan was updated and we did a bunch of Emergency Management training and some drills; so, there’s all really good stuff going on in our Core Functions. In terms of the metrics, you can see how many proactive checks we’re doing, and so, despite the fact that our officers are doing a lot of Calls for Service, in comparison to other agencies, they still have a fair amount of time to go out and be proactive, check the parks, check the schools, patrol our business communities, stop and talk to citizens, things like that. So, that’s one metric that helps us decide, do we need to add more officers? Do we need to consider a different response model? And the fact that we still are doing a ton of these proactive checks, and that number is not declining, indicates to me that we had at least a bare minimum number of officers on the street to achieve their mission. And, again, that’s just one metric that we use to make that decision, but that’s a really good sign. Calls for Service and Response Times, you can see that in comparison to the Benchmark Survey, we’re about 30 seconds faster for Priority 1 calls; again, what that means is we have enough officers, and our response model is working. We’re beating other agencies, which is a great thing; the faster we get there, officers are controlling the scene, and can save lives. Cottage Grove has extremely low crime rates, both for person crimes and property crimes. As you can see on the top, we’re averaging 7 crimes per 1,000 vs. 10; and with property crimes, we’re about a third of the national average, so extremely safe. The same thing with mental health calls and overdoses, they’re way lower than our competitors. I shouldn’t call them competitors, but they are, those are the averages. Traffic Safety: We’re right on par, where we need to be. Be advised we’re doing more DWIs and as Nick said, our pursuits are trending down, which is a really good thing, because we know pursuits are very dangerous and fraught with all kinds of liabilities and risks; so, it’s a good thing that our pursuits are trending down, but our officers do still have the power to chase when it is prudent. So, it’s not, those numbers aren’t declining by virtue of us tightening the screws on them and restricting them from doing their job, they’re just being smarter about when they should and should not chase. Like Nick said, we’re doing things to try to prevent that pursuit in the first place. Clearance rates is another place that we’re excelling. Our detectives are averaging about 80% clearance rates, which means 80% of the cases that get referred to them are getting solved, and that case is resulting in a criminal charge. When you think about some of the cases that get referred to them with very minimal leads, they’re getting out there and doing incredible detective work, and they have some time, frankly, to invest in these cases so that they can pursue charges on these cases. Frankly, most agencies are so overburdened by the huge call volumes and lack of staffing that their detectives are averaging 2, 3, 4, or 5 times the amount of cases, and they just don’t have time to invest in these cases that are lower severity or there are no good leads. And, so, their clearance rates are generally around 40% or 50%, for most departments; and look at us, we’re up at about 80%. Out of all this data, the thing that I’m most proud of is our Police Services Survey. We’re averaging about a 94% satisfaction rate overall, and it’s just unbelievable for police agencies to achieve a satisfaction rate like that. So, above all else, that’s what I’m most proud of. Council Member Thiede asked what’s the sample quantity on that? How many people? Captain Petersen replied, so, right now, it’s at about 100 respondents. And the odd thing is, it’s not odd, but interesting, when the first surveys started coming in, you know, it was at 90-some percent, and I thought it was by virtue of this being a small sample size. But as more and more keep coming in, it’s holding steady right there, it’s not dropping at all. The other thing is that we don’t really choose, we’re not sending these surveys out to people who we expect to be happy with our services; it’s going out to random samples. And it’s available on our website, it’s available on social media. We hand it out to everybody on the street after delivering our service, and so, there are plenty of people that we expect wouldn’t be incredibly happy with us that are giving us good marks. Captain Petersen said all right, we’re moving on to Pillars of Our Community. There aren’t a whole lot of really good metrics for this, but one of those is our Use of Force data that Nick just talked about; so, we rely on a lot of intangibles, and that’s a mark of progress by things that we’ve done and accomplished and it has been a lot in the last year: •One of the really cool things is that we’re now using our post-service commission as a Citizen Advisory Board, which is another way that we can give the community an opportunity to provide feedback on our services and give input on our decision making. We put a lot of effort into branding and leveraging social media to get our City Council Meeting February 5, 2025 Page 17 of 23 message out there to the community and engage the community. We know that it doesn’t reach everyone in the community, but this is a really powerful tool. •We’re also starting the process of upgrading our website, just recently, so hopefully within the next six months, we can see that come to fruition. •Our Annual Report got published, and that was something that I personally was a little bit nervous about because to throw that much data out there without explanations, it can easily run wildly, especially on Facebook; but there was overwhelming support behind that, very few off-color comments, and one comment was specifically addressed by a community member, which is pretty cool to see. •Community Impact Team is doing great things, we added a social worker. •Another cool thing is that our Explorer Program and our Reserve Officer Program have been revitalized. At one point, our Reserve Program was down to about six Reserves, now it’s up to about 15; we didn’t stop taking applications, but we had to stop taking people on, and we just kind of put them in a holding pattern. With the Explorer Program, we’re up to around 17 Explorers, and they’re doing great in the competitions; again, that’s starting to increase that recruitment pipeline super early, and a lot of these Explorers will hopefully be future police officers here. •A lot of work went into investing in our employees, making sure that they feel appreciated and people are recognizing Cottage Grove as an Employer of Choice. There are some good metrics there that shows we’re doing a good job and Core Values are acting positively. All of these things that you’ve heard us talking about, that we’ve asked permission for and you’ve authorized, have made a huge difference there. Labor contracts went a long way to making our employees feel appreciated and establishing us as an Employer of Choice. The C.S.O. Cadet program is a landmark in our recruiting efforts, and then we’ve done a really good job about recognizing our employees and awarding them appropriately. A couple technology and practice type things that have changed recently: We did the ALPR, which is an Automated License Plate Reader; that testing phase didn’t go so well, so we shelved it and started to look at FLOCK. We’ve got a proposal that’s ready, I’m just waiting on the bundling piece. That’s a really exciting opportunity that’s right there, at our fingertips. We’re revisiting the ALPR thing because Motorola came back and they offered us a free trial for an entire year for our whole fleet, so we’re going to definitely seize that opportunity. Mayor Bailey asked what is FLOCK? Captain Petersen replied it’s cameras that we position throughout town; it also has a license plate reader on it, and so, it basically gives us alerts whenever there’s a stolen vehicle or a KOPS Alert or a particular vehicle we’re looking for. It’s a really great tool, and a big piece of it, to me, is an investigative piece on the back end; so, if I’ve got a burglary report and it says that there was a white sedan canvassing the neighborhood that might be related to this case, I can literally go in and search Cottage Grove and all the surrounding areas that use FLOCK for a white sedan, even with a partial license plate, at this time and place. It will give us potential leads to assist us in our investigation. Council Member Thiede said I believe the ALPR, and that’s with Motorola, is a competitor to FLOCK; what would you say the differences are? Captain Petersen replied Motorola’s system network that we’re testing is squad based, its in our squad cars. They do have a stationary camera feature that we haven’t tested or explored. FLOCK is more of the stationary camera piece. Council Member Thiede said so, I’ve got to believe, though, that it can’t be just, it’s probably a combination of both; I imagine a certain part of it is the access they have to different databases and information. It’s not just reading a license plate, it’s been effectively using some AI or some interpretive type of deal to go out and get information and provide you some feedback, based on the information that it collects wherever that information is. Captain Petersen replied right, so, both systems use proprietary software; they access both NCIC and BCA DMV records, things like that, to search for queries based on whatever parameters we set up, it’ll alert us in that proprietary software. City Council Meeting February 5, 2025 Page 18 of 23 Council Member Thiede asked so, are you just finding that the stationary readers that FLOCK has, you’re obviously positioning those in certain places to read those, is giving you more information than having it right in the squad car? Captain Petersen replied they both have pros and cons. The pros of the FLOCK is that they’re 24/7; every single car that drives by is getting read and queried, whereas in the squad car, not every squad car is at 80th and Jamaica, 24/7. Director Koerner said there’s a lot of challenges with the Motorola, but at night it’s not always picking up; I mean, it works fine in a business parking lot or something, so. But their technology is also getting better, so that’s why we haven’t closed the door on them. Council Member Thiede said and some of the FLOCK video analysis where it’s picking up is doing a little bit better. Captain Petersen said yes. Director Koerner said kind of, but we’ve also been working with our IT Department, Bryan has looked at FLOCK, and he can kind of design it with the parked cameras and stuff, too; so, there’s a lot of additional things that we can benefit from. Captain Petersen said the back end of FLOCK, the investigative piece, is what drove us; so, those other agencies who have been using FLOCK, it’s proven to be a very good tool to help them solve crimes on the back end, as well as being able to detect those stolen vehicles and things like that to patrol officers. Mayor Bailey said that incident that was at the Woodbury Target, was that using FLOCK? Captain Petersen replied yes. Mayor Bailey said that’s what I thought, okay. Mayor Bailey said and then, Brian, and you already said it, Woodbury is using FLOCK, and would we able to talk together and link up together? Brian Bluhm, IT Manager, replied yes. Everybody in the country that uses FLOCK can choose to share data; and. so, not every agency chooses to share, but why wouldn’t you? Mayor Bailey said right, exactly. Thank you. Captain Petersen said and just an example, too, we had an incident like at Hadley and 97th, or by Hadley and Greene, a shooting, right, last year? We read off the license plate once we finally got it off a Ring camera of one of the houses. Woodbury heard us air that, and then they ran that through their FLOCK, and they were able to say, hey, what time was that at? Well, I have that vehicle, it just hit a FLOCK camera at 11:30 p.m. in St. Paul. So, they have access to that so then we could see where that vehicle was and where it went. Just so you know, we had a committee that, they were working with FLOCK, and we planned out or we discussed how many cameras we’d need at full implementation, and then would fill that in stages. Stage 1 of implementation, and so, ideally, we’d like to start with between 6-to-12 cameras in Phase 1, that’s dependent on our funding sources or exploring different funding options. So, once we secure that funding piece, we’re ready to run. Mayor Bailey asked what is the cost of a camera? Captain Petersen replied that would be $3,000 per camera, per year. Mayor Bailey asked $3,000? He said I’ll be honest with you, it’s not as bad as I thought. Council Member Garza said no, not at all. Director Koerner said we’re looking at some different business partnerships; like in Hudson, Uline got like 12 for that community. I mean, obviously, they have one near there to help, so. TJ Maxx actually has a grant out right now that we’re looking at, so that would help; we’re looking at our Business District, too, and maybe some associations could pay for one. Council Member Clausen said one last question, Brad, while we’re talking about cameras, with our portable cameras and trailers that we have, right, that’s after my time, can that be integrated into S.W.A.T.? Captain Petersen replied yes, if; so, there’s a piece of S.W.A.T. where they’ve got like a, I’m not a techie, so, I’m not going to go through this, but they have a piece of technology where you can take all of your different video sources and streams, run them through their technology, and then it implements all those capabilities in S.W.A.T. Council Member Clausen said of course the cameras would also be much, much, higher than that, so that might be hard to. City Council Meeting February 5, 2025 Page 19 of 23 Director Koerner said that’s what Brian is talking about, with the park building here and some of those, so, right now. It doesn’t have to be their actual FLOCK camera system. Council Member Clausen said okay. Director Koerner replied yes, so, but you’re right with ours, so, I’m with Brad on that, but that’s our IT Department. Captain Petersen said that piece was kind of expensive, I’ll give him that, that was a little expensive, but it would be cool. Captain Petersen said I’m not going to get into all of this, but if you have specific questions, but just know that we have spent a ton of time and some long-range planning and preparing to grow with our community and adapt to the changing challenges and needs of our community. We envision ourselves and we brand ourselves as being innovators and leaders, and we’re committed to that. We’re doing a lot, I was going to say doing a lot with a little, but that’s not right to say; we have the resources we need at this point. Would we like more? Yes, but honestly, we fare better than most communities in terms of maintaining adequate staffing. But relative to other agencies, we do and achieve a lot more, we offer a lot more services and better service to our community than most communities do. It’s even, I’m still impressed and a little bit amazed sometimes how we manage to keep all these balls in the air and do what we do with the number of officers and resources that we have. When you look at the dollars and cents, we are doing more, reporting better with four budgets and the amount of overtime compared to our best mark averages. I just don’t know how to say it other than just by every metric and way you can measure it, our department is doing great. Captain Petersen said with that, I’ll open it up for questions. Mayor Bailey asked Council if they had any questions. Director Koerner said there was one that you had mentioned with like the staffing; I know Jon has some for Fire, but as far as police staffing, I mean, when we got the DUI grant, and as I mentioned, we have the three new officers that have just started. So, we’re at, we have the authorized staffing of 48, and we’re able to, Marshal is being deployed, so we’re able to move hiring up; a couple of our C.S.O. candidates can’t start as fulltime police, and so, we’re at that point where, fingers crossed, we’re going to be at our 48 officers. Mayor Bailey asked so, even with the deployment? Director Koerner replied well, we’ll be at 47, but we use some of those savings with him being gone for 10 months to push one of our hires up. So, I think last year the reorganization that we did with the Community Impact and Administrative Sergeant, actually, Sergeant Coffey has recently gotten hurt on a medical; Sergeant McCormick’s kind of been able to do both, and he’s doing his Community Impact, but he’s also taken some of the Saturdays. So, we’re not feeling the real pinch right now, but three months ago, we had a lot of maternity-paternity leaves and things, so now things are. Mayor Bailey asked so, no other issues right at the moment? Director Koerner replied the sky is not falling right now. Mayor Bailey said well, that, but I’m also looking like down the road, because you’re talking about looking to the future, with retirements. Director Koerner replied, yes, and we have that planned, kind of with our succession planning and obviously, with our staffing plan, our ultimate goal is to have eight officers on every patrol shift, and we finally hit eight on one and the other is seven. So, we have to give people their time off when we do the training and everything, so, that is kind of our future plan and why we need these additional two patrol officers. Our level of service, I think Brad hit it with all of the specialties, and look at our clearance rate with Investigations because we’re not robbing them; every time someone gets hurt, we don’t pull someone out of school or pull someone out of our specialties. That’s when people get upset, when we start moving their schedules. Captain Petersen said all things being equal, I would love to add three officers to each set, so we’d have eight patrol officers per shift. That would give us that cushion where if somebody gets hurt, pregnant, leaves for another agency, whatever, we can absorb that impact and not have to pull people out of specialties or whatever. I think that’s where we need to be. Granted, as the community continues to grow, we’re going to need to grow with the community, but adding those three additional officers would be ideal, but we understand it’s a balancing act. Council Member Garza asked are these action pictures from training? City Council Meeting February 5, 2025 Page 20 of 23 Captain Petersen replied yeah, so, remember I told you that we had a PepperBall talent shoot and a pro shoot? That was one of the photos that we got from the training catalog. Council Member Garza said with this first picture, too, it looked like he was in an action movie or something like that. Mayor Bailey asked well, this one was the one that was out at The Gooch, right? Director Koerner replied this was in Las Vegas when our department was featured, and it’s all over their Facebook. And as part of that, they’re giving us some money for some different wellness things and stuff. Council Member Garza said that’s very cool. Fire Chief Jon Pritchard said Mayor, Council, thank you so much for having us, and with the Police Department’s Strategic Plan, it gave us the opportunity to talk about our Strategic Plan. So, I just really want to open it up with questions and discussion. I selected a few kind of pieces from our Strategic Plan to talk about, just as a taste, but I think we really can discuss just about anything, including an update on our staffing and response times, too. So, we selected a few parts from our overall Strategic Plan just to show the progress that we’re making in some of this. We have a Strategic Plan scorecard that we actually use every week in our Chief meetings, we actually go over that and measure our progress towards those goals to ensure that we’re remaining on point. I think this really shows both police and fire that these are living and breathing documents, that we have actual metrics for most of them, and some of those are if it’s not on here, it is not done. One of the big ones that we really looked at is how do we provide services? So, this is just kind of fresh off the press, we gave all these just a few weeks after the end of the fiscal year, to allow all the responses to come in and we did our EMS Survey. We got 132 responses from that, and what we saw with our EMS Survey is 97% of respondents strongly agreed or agreed they were treated with respect, and they were satisfied with the care they received. Our goal is over 90%, so, we’re incredibly happy with this goal. My background was working fulltime in hospitals and nursing leadership, and we were lucky to see over 60% in the hospital, so this is phenomenal work that we do to provide that care for our folks. We’ve been diving more into our outcomes, quality improvements, quality assurance on things like chest pain, our heart care, stroke care, and we provide exceptional care, while we’re also providing an exceptional experience for our folks. One of the goals is budget and planning, and a big thing for me is financial stewardship. So, when we’re asking for resources, we need those resources, and we’re going to do it in a cost effective way. However, of course, there’s tough, crucial conversations when we need resources, such as being heart ready. But one thing we’re really proud of is how we can trust our fleet. Really, since I kind of came on as Fire Chief, it’s what type of model do we run? This is a more career, fulltime department, so we don’t need many trucks because we don’t have to drive to a station; we have five stations around the City, and they all have to be close enough for people to drive from home, so that gives us the opportunity to be more efficient with our fleet. So, not only have we kind of reduced the amount of vehicles we have, which has greatly reduced the costs in terms of maintenance and upkeep, now we’re also not needing to replace them. We have to look at, when we buy a truck, it’s not about how cool does it look, how many lights does it have, it needs to meet six different types of things, it needs to spray water when we’re using it on a fire. So, with this new tender that we’re buying, right, Brenda? We budgeted $650,000, and that was basing it on quotes, like this is what the typical thing costs, but we got that at $507,000. And this isn’t like hey, if prices stopped increasing, this is because we looked at what do we really need to provide exceptional service, not to be the coolest truck on the block; we even reduced it from 4 to 2 speeds because typically, when we respond with a fire tender, we’re bringing water to a rural area, and we do that with two people. And, so, we saved a significant amount of money in that, and that’s a huge cost savings for our residents and our City, so, we’re very proud of that. We’re going to get this piece of equipment, it should arrive late this year or early next year, and that’s going to allow us to do a great job. So, this is our fiscal stewardship that we really want to look at, when we can save money and not out of doing a bunch of extra stuff that we don’t need. Workload and Services: We have a second Deputy Chief, which I cannot say enough for, Deputy Chief Peterson; he started in October, 2024, and he’s done phenomenal work in our training programs, safety and professional standards. He’s only been a few months into the job, but he’s already bringing in national training to Cottage City Council Meeting February 5, 2025 Page 21 of 23 Grove, and there are only six places in this country can do, and that’s through some of his connections with some of the work he does. So, we’re incredibly proud of that, we’re sending more people than ever to train this year, and that’s all because of the Council allowing us to get that extra resource. And I’m happy to say because we’ve said it a lot, the Fire Department, as part of the City’s organizational study we did citywide, we have now completed that organizational study and received those positions that were identified, so thank you; that’s a huge accomplishment and has had such a huge impact on our department on a daily basis to have the appropriate number of chiefs and administrative-type positions. Growth Trends: Brad really alluded to it in that we can find the appropriate venue to share our 2024 data. However, just a quick, fun fact is our call volumes went up 61% since 2017, and that was when our current staffing levels were established. We also have, as we mentioned, our model is changing as well, so, this is what really prompted that Station 4 discussion, to be a standard coverage site. So, the standard coverage site means that we will then take our finalists to do final interviews for them. And this study is going to be very comprehensive: They will look at community risk, they’ll look at like the railroads that go through town and have a materials risk, demographics, what are our response times, what is the national benchmark, and also, where should we place stations if we need more stations, what does the future look like? And they do phenomenal work, there’s a lot of them out there, there’s a lot of firms that do them. But really, that’s going to help us determine future needs. So, it’s a very exciting thing, and it’s very exciting to review the proposals because there’s a lot of great stuff in there. One thing we’re very excited about is that we’re getting back to our career staffing numbers that we’re authorized for; so, we’re going to restart our shift-based Life Safety inspections. That’s our program when we go into occupancies, pretty much any non-single family home; we even go into apartment buildings, but we go and visit them, and our goal is to do over 90% of the occupancies in Cottage Grove every year. It’s the best way in which we can engage the community, provide great customer service, provide those connections with those places, but also make sure they’re safe from fire and other hazards. Based on our collective bargaining agreement, we promoted specialty positions, just like the police have for their different things. So, our Fire Inspector/Driver, so they get that extra little, as they do all the work for fire inspections, and they have to be able to drive a fire truck. And, so, they’re starting those, and we’ve already had great success in that goal. We’re not going to quite hit 90%, just based on the resources we have and the time available between running calls, but every one we do is just having that great of an impact, and we’re really excited to get that started and get it up and going. We have three phenomenal people who are going to lead that effort for us, along with Steve Zaccard, our Fire Marshal. Council Member Garza said I was going to say I had, I just actually had this encounter, as we had new windows put in, and when they came to sign off on the permit, our contractor said, oh, yeah, and by the way, they’re checking your fire alarms. And I hadn’t had any encounter that, you know, I thought they only do that in rentals and stuff; so, I asked the inspector when he came, he said well, when we get the opportunity if we come in and do a sign off on a permit, we try to check. And it was a blessing because my fire alarms were from 2017, so, thank you, that was terrible. Chief Pritchard said next year with the Safe Haven program, where we get home safety surveys; we have a box of old alarms, and so, 2017 isn’t bad. We found one from the early 70s, and we tested one last week that we needed carbon data, that’s how old it is. So, it’s just a huge part for our community to reach out to this program. Chief Pritchard said then, one of probably the most proud moments for me, personally, and for our department, was one of the big reasons I chose to be fulltime healthcare leadership is I was really upset at not seeing the community-based paramedics being out there, really changing people’s healthcare. And that’s what our Fire Department really gives you the chance to do, especially when you run your own ambulance service. Some communities have paramedics, but left such a huge space for us, and community paramedics really are to be life changers for people. They’re in the community, they respond to the community, and they have that one-on-one relationship with folks. And a big part of the Case Management Unit is, of course, mental health, substance abuse disorders, it’s not just the mind, it’s not just potential living situations, but there’s also a huge medical component with that. And by imbedding that community paramedic within that team, that really creates a more holistic response, and then you throw the social worker in there, and you’ve got like the premier model: You’ve got City Council Meeting February 5, 2025 Page 22 of 23 medical, mental health, and then the police/law enforcement aspect. And our Captain Chelsey Flores, she did her clinical, her community paramedic, and that was her project to do that, and through that, she was successful, and now she sees clients, she co-responds with our CMU, and it’s just amazing the things that we’re seeing. To the group home discussion, she’s been involved in creating plans of care, developing better response plans for our paramedics when we have to go there. So, she’s literally playing that role, and then Deputy Chief Arrigoni and I are both community paramedics, but of course Deputy Chief Arrigoni plays a big role in leading that effort. So, really, I can answer the questions about the staffing, as that sounds like it’s kind of the biggest one. Currently, we are authorized for 16 fulltime folks, and we’re at 15; we posted, got three good candidates, and those candidates decided to take opportunities elsewhere, so we just reposted that again. We felt very fortunate we found those three great candidates, and right now, there’s probably like 35 open fulltime positions in the metro, as we speak. So, we’re literally competing against some other departments in the metro with similar jobs. However, we have done a phenomenal job in the quality folks that we have, they truly have changed the culture of our department in a great way. One of the metrics we use is what percentage of time do we reach our minimum staffing, because, realistically, that’s our goal. With the amount of people we have, our minimum is really our goal, and we’re now at 92% of the time in January that we’re at our minimums or above. You compare that to kind of like the low, as last year we were like doing that 50% of the time, so we’ve made monumental strides to do that, while not just picking any candidate, but picking the right candidates. So, we’ve made huge strides in that. Our parttime staff continues to be a struggle with both recruiting and retention; we’re currently at nine people and sometimes we hire them, we try to onboard them, and then they don’t even start, that’s very common within that group. So, we’re going to be posting here soon, we really need to try to prioritize this fulltime posting because they work 2,800 hours a year, roughly, vs. 432; however, we’re going to be posting for that soon, with a goal of trying to get six of those folks to fill out our roster for parttime. Director Koerner said that focus will be a later summer hire because fire training isn’t until. Chief Pritchard replied, yeah, we’re going to try to do one for already certified folks because there are some certified; so, what we just thought of, too, not because we’re doing this, but we pay people to attend Fire School. We can get reimbursed for the training through the State of Minnesota; however, the amount is about $5,000 or $7,500 per person just in salary when you send them to Fire School. So, we wanted to try to get some folks that were already both Fire and EMT certified, but then we will do that later, probably in the Spring, to try to; we can hire them as an EMT and then send them to Fire School in the Fall. Administrator Levitt said well, Mayor and Council, there is one thing Jon didn’t put up there, and he’s probably too humble to say it, so I will say it. I think the biggest thing that has happened in the Fire Department over the last year is the culture changed. I’ve done retention interviews down there, I’ve done new employee interviews, they’re selecting our organization because of the culture. I mean, they want the training opportunities, they like how command staff is actually engaged in the field, they respond with them, they have their back. The state of the art equipment and training, they don’t have to bid on it. The fact that we give them actual time off, they’re not penalized for being sick, that goes a long way. The other thing is Jon sends out a weekly announcement, it has the title: Operations, People, Training, and Community Risk Reduction. He puts a ton of time in every single week to ensure that every person in the Fire Department knows exactly what’s going on. So, if any firefighter ever tells you that they don’t know what’s going on in the Fire Department, that ain’t true, because I read them every week; and it’s how we’re going to respond, how we’re hanging up hoses, or what we’re doing, everything is getting communicated in detail to them. So, I want you to know the organization has changed, the transparency, the communication, the openness, and I’ve seen the team dynamic change radically. That’s something we can’t put on a graph, it’s something we can’t put on a chart, but it has happened, and I want to just say that Jon has done an outstanding job to lead that culture change. Chief Pritchard said thank you. Mayor Bailey said so, Jon, when you talk about minimums, is that like per shift? Chief Pritchard replied yeah, so, it would be 4 people total that provides 2 ambulances, 24 hours a day. City Council Meeting February 5, 2025 Page 23 of 23 Director Koerner said 24 hours is what we’re referring to, and Chief Pritchard agreed. Mayor Bailey asked how many shifts is it, 2? Chief Pritchard replied it’s 3 shifts. So, full-timers are assigned to one, and then part-timers work 12-hour shifts to fill those shifts up. Mayor Bailey said okay, so if it’s, when you said 90%? Chief Pritchard replied 92%. Mayor Bailey said so, 92% of the time we’re at least at that. Chief Pritchard replied that is correct. Chief Pritchard said and we just pulled data for January; so, one of the things we did that parttime conversion in December, so we hired a fulltime person, and I stole this idea from Roseville, White Bear Lake, and other folks: We have 16 fulltime people. I’m not a mathematician, I had asked Brenda to check my math on this, but 16 doesn’t divide by 3 very well. So, we actually put 6 people on one shift, the other two shifts have 5 fulltime people, and then they fill with parttime. In January, so, it’s only 31 days of data, we actually saw that 40% of the time, we had 5 or 6 people, and 22% of the time we actually had 6 people, or more than our minimum. So, then that provided us 2 ambulances and then a 2-person fire engine, which is the stage we really need to be at. Because if two ambulances are gone, we don’t have a fire engine coming from Woodbury, Newport, St. Paul Park as the first responding engine. So, but we know with our volumes, it’s not realistic just to do one, nor would I recommend that at this time. Mayor Bailey asked if the Council had any questions at this point; none were asked. Council Member Garza said he’s rocking it, that’s what it sounds like. Mayor Bailey said I know you were asking earlier, what do we want to hear, on a consistent basis. I think if you, I mean, we definitely don’t need to do workshops quarterly or anything like that; but if you, almost like what Jennifer puts out weekly, and I’m not saying you guys weekly, I’m saying quarterly, if you just want to give us the highlights. Hey, we hired a new firefighter, fulltime, that starts on this day, or hey, here’s how many Explorers we have, you know what I’m saying? Those are some of the things that would be kind of neat to see as it’s part of the Strategic Plan. Director Koerner said, so, they could just give a quarterly report, at least. Mayor Bailey said that’s what I’m saying. I don't know that you need to reinvent the wheel, and it isn’t like you need to. I mean, if there’s something drastic that’s happening or whatever, and you go hey, we probably should come and chat with you about it, then obviously, you know, feel free to do that. But I don’t think you need to just push paper, so to speak, for the sake of doing that for us. Do you know what I mean? Mayor Bailey stated he will set up a meeting with Mayor Keith Franke. Mayor Bailey said all right, anything else, Council? No one spoke. Mayor Bailey said thank you, everybody, for coming in here tonight. I’ll look for a motion to adjourn. 14. WORKSHOPS - CLOSED TO PUBLIC - None. 15. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Council Member Thiede, second by Council Member Garza, to adjourn the meeting at 9:05 p.m. Motion carried: 4-0. Minutes prepared by Judy Graf and reviewed by Tamara Anderson, City Clerk. 1 City Council Action Request 7.B. Meeting Date 3/5/2025 Department Administration Agenda Category Action Item Title City Council Special Meeting Minutes (2025-02-19) Staff Recommendation Approve the February 19, 2025, Special Meeting Minutes. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. 2025-02-19 City Council Special Meeting CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE 12800 Ravine Parkway South Cottage Grove, Minnesota 55016 www.cottagegrovemn.gov 651-458-2800 Fax 651-458-2897 Equal Opportunity Employer COTTAGE GROVE CITY COUNCIL February 19, 2025 12800 RAVINE PARKWAY SOUTH COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 SPECIAL MEETING – ST CROIX ROOM - 6:15 P.M 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Bailey called the Special Meeting to order at 6:15 p.m. and recited the following language to close the Special Meeting: Closed session pursuant to Minn. Stat. 13D.05 subd. 3 (d) for a security briefing with the Council to discuss issues related to security systems, to discuss emergency response procedures and to discuss security deficiencies in or recommendations regarding public services, infrastructure, and facilities. Disclosure of this information would pose a danger to public safety or compromise security procedures and responses. The facilities that will be discussed are City Hall. A motion was made to close the meeting by Councilmember Olsen and seconded by Councilmember Thiede. A motion was made at 6:48 p.m. to open the meeting by Councilmember Thiede and seconded by Councilmember Olsen. Minutes prepared by Judy Graf and reviewed by Tamara Anderson, City Clerk. 1 City Council Action Request 7.C. Meeting Date 3/5/2025 Department Administration Agenda Category Action Item Title City Council Regular Meeting (2025-02-19) Staff Recommendation Approve the February 19, 2025, Regular Meeting Minutes. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. 2025-2-19 City Council Meeting CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE 12800 Ravine Parkway Cottage Grove, Minnesota 55016 www.cottagegrovemn.gov 651-458-2800 Fax 651-458-2897 Equal Opportunity Employer COTTAGE GROVE CITY COUNCIL February 19, 2025 12800 RAVINE PARKWAY SOUTH COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 COUNCIL CHAMBER - 7:00 P.M 1. CALL TO ORDER The City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, Washington County, Minnesota, held a regular meeting on February 19, 2025, at Cottage Grove City Hall, 12800 Ravine Parkway. Mayor Bailey called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The audience, staff, and City Council Members stood and recited the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. ROLL CALL City Clerk Tammy Anderson called the roll: Mayor Bailey-Here; Council Member Clausen-Here; Council Member Garza-Here; Council Member Olsen-Here; Council Member Thiede-Here. Also present: Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator; Tammy Anderson, City Clerk; Ryan Burfeind, Public Works Director; Zac Dockter, Parks and Recreation Director; Pete Koerner, Public Safety Director; Stacie Kvilvang, Ehlers & Associates, Inc.; Korine Land, City Attorney-LeVander, Gillen & Miller, PA; Gretchen Larson, Economic Development Director; Brenda Malinowski, Finance Director; Emily Schmitz, Community Development Director; Phil Jents, Communication Manager; Samantha Pierret, Senior Planner. 4. OPEN FORUM Mayor Bailey opened the Open Forum. As no one wished to address the Council, Mayor Bailey closed the Open Forum. 5. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Motion by Council Member Thiede to approve the agenda; second by Council Member Garza. Motion carried: 5-0. 6. PRESENTATIONS - None. 7. CONSENT AGENDA A. Accept the 2025 Strategic Directions. B. Approve the December 6, 2024 Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Meeting Minutes. C. Approve the December 3, 2024 Economic Development Authority Regular Meeting Minutes. D. Approve the issuance of rental licenses to the properties listed in the attached table. E. Approve Resolution 2025-22, Accept Donations for 4th Quarter 2024. F. Approve the 2025 Commissioner and Committee Reappointments. City Council Meeting February 19, 2025 Page 2 of 23 G. Appoint Terrence Woodman to the Planning Commission to a term ending on February 28, 2027. H. Approve the renewal of an Intoxicating Hemp License to Highnorth Dispensary allowing them to continue to sell Lower Potency Hemp products. I. Approve the letter to the Minnesota Department of Revenue requesting they begin Lodging Tax collection for the City of Cottage Grove. J. Adopt Resolution 2025-015, supporting federal legislation to reimburse body armor costs for all emergency responders, including firefighters, rescue, and EMS professionals. K. Approve the Accurint Virtual Crime Center SaaS in the amount of $6,000 annually. L. Approve the ImageTrend Fire Investigations SaaS in the amount of $1,500 annually, plus a one-time $225 implementation fee for a total of $1,725. M. Approve the agreement for professional services with FireCatt Precision Service Testing. N. Approve the two-year amendment with Squeaky Cleaners and Painters for janitorial services. O. Staff recommends the approval of the ImageTrend Community Health Care SaaS in the amount of $7,500 annually, plus a one-time $1,500 implementation fee, for a total of $9,000. P. Authorize cooperative agreement with the State of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to construct a fishing pier at Mississippi Dunes Park. Q. Approve the ACTIVE Net Master Agreement as reviewed by staff and City legal counsel. R. Adopt Resolution 2025-019 approving the 2025 Mining Permit for Holcim - MWR, Inc. - Nelson Sand & Gravel Facility. S. Adopt Resolution 2025-016 approving the plans and specifications and authorizing bidding for the High Zone Raw Water Main Project. T. 1) Approve Change Order # in the amount of $1,100. 2) Adopt Resolution 2025-017 approving the final payment for the Low Zone Water Treatment Plant and Utility/Engineering Building Project to Castrejon, Inc., in the amount of $68,504.70. U. Adopt Resolution 2025-023 authorizing the preparation of a feasibility report for Ravine Parkway from 85th Street to Keats Avenue. V. Adopt Resolution 2025-021 approving the plans and specifications and authorize bidding for the 2025 Pavement Management Project. Council Member Thiede wished to pull Item R, Holcim 2025 Mining Permit, and Mayor Bailey wished to pull Item P, MN DNR Cooperative Agreement for Mississippi Dunes Park Fishing Pier, on the Consent Agenda for further comment and/or discussion. Mayor Bailey said we’ll start with Council Member Thiede, and asked if he just wanted some clarification on this one; Council Member Thiede replied yes, as there’s both this permit, a 2025 permit, and then there’s also been the Environmental Study. He wanted someone to just explain the difference between those and that we’re just looking at the 2025 permit, and it really has nothing to do with the Environmental study that went on in the backwaters part. Emily Schmitz, Community Development Director, stated the image before you is showing on the lefthand side Holcim’s proposed mining area for the 2025 Mining Permit. On the righthand side is the separate area that they are working on with an entirely separate process for the expansion of their mining operation in the backwaters of the Mississippi River. Council Member Thiede said so, in 2025, they’re pretty much staying kind of right in that same area that they were in 2024; all right, good. Mayor Bailey thanked Director Schmitz for that clarification. Mayor Bailey said for the public, I pulled Item P, the MN DNR Cooperative Agreement for Mississippi Dunes Park Fishing Pier, and I want to acknowledge the fact that our Park staff, specifically, does an amazing job of going out there and trying to find funding sources for our parks and our open spaces. For those who may or may not remember, we tried for a Local Option Sales Tax that did not pass this last November, but that didn’t stop the fact that we’re going to still go out and update parks and so on. The great news is that I don't even know that we really originally were thinking there was going to be a fishing pier, but the DNR was very excited about this opportunity City Council Meeting February 19, 2025 Page 3 of 23 to get access into the river; so, our staff has been working different angles and processes, and so what this is doing is authorizing approval for the City to enter into an agreement to have that fishing pier purchased, paid for by the DNR. So, I thought I’d just mention that since I know that’s exciting as we go forward. Motion by Council Member Garza to approve the Consent Agenda; second by Council Member Clausen. Motion carried: 5-0. 8. APPROVE DISBURSEMENTS A. Approve disbursements for the period of 1-31-2025 through 2-12-2025 in the amount of $2,753,364.99. Motion by Council Member Olsen to approve disbursements; second by Council Member Clausen. Motion carried: 5-0. 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Property Tax Abatement for a portion of the 2025A Bonds Staff Recommendation: 1) Hold Public Hearing for property tax abatements in connection with the bond issuance for the irrigation project at the golf course. 2) Adopt Resolution 2025-018, approving the property tax abatements. Mayor Bailey said this is a Public Hearing. Stacie Kvilvang from Ehlers & Associates, Inc. is here to walk us through this. He welcomed Stacie. Stacie said thank you, Mayor and Members of the Council. As you stated this is a Public Hearing on the Tax Abatement portion of the bonds, which you’re issuing, it’s about $1.64 million of that. This is our statutory authority in which to pay for those improvements, which are improvements to your irrigation system for the public golf course for which you’re reimbursing yourself. A requirement is for us to select parcels that we will abate the City’s portion of property taxes from; so, the parcels that are listed in the Public Hearing are the Aurilla Apartments and a commercial space that’s on 95th Avenue. There’s no nexus test required for the abating of those parcels, it’s just a technicality that we have to have that we show that the City’s portion of taxes will cover the principal amount of the bonds. The Public Hearing, then, for you this evening is on granting that tax abatement for this project, finding that the tax abatement equals the principal amount of the bonds, and also that it is in the public interest because it’s improving public facilities and services to the residents. So, with that, I’m happy to stand for any questions. Mayor Bailey asked if Council had any questions for Stacie at this point; none were asked. Mayor Bailey thanked Stacie. Mayor Bailey opened the Public Hearing; this is the opportunity if anybody wants to speak on this item, they’re welcome to do so at this time. Bonnie Matter, 6649 Inskip Avenue South, Cottage Grove, said I was just wondering if Stacie could just explain how this differs from a property tax levy. Thank you. Stacie replied Mayor, Council Members, essentially it’s no different from a property tax levy because it’s a levy that you’re increasing to abate your property taxes to go and put those resources towards something else that you’re actually bonding for; so, technically, even though it’s called a tax abatement, it is a tax levy. Mayor Bailey said I’ll say what I think might be the question; so, the question is this isn’t a tax on top of an already tax, correct? City Council Meeting February 19, 2025 Page 4 of 23 Stacie replied Mayor, Council Members, that’s correct. Mayor Bailey said I just wanted to make sure that that was clear; we weren’t adding an extra tax, we’re just diverting, if you will, or moving the tax from that area to something specific. Stacie stated correct. Mayor Bailey asked Bonnie if that answered her question; Bonnie said it’s just a different way of looking at it. Mayor Bailey said well, that’s why I was trying to say it, because it wasn’t a tax on top of a tax, so it’s already there. Bonnie said so it’s reducing the taxes that are coming in that would be used, that’s all; it’s just different. Bonnie said thank you. Mayor Bailey thanked Stacie. As no one else wished to speak on this item, Mayor Bailey closed the Public Hearing. Council Member Olsen said I appreciate your explanation on how the tax abatement process works and the fact that it’s not an additional tax, it’s simply reallocating funds, right? And the comment was made that it reduces our tax that we collect; is that accurate? Stacie replied no. Council Member Olsen said, okay, could you explain? Stacie said Mayor and Council Members, essentially you have bonds that you’re paying, and you have a portion that you have to use your tax revenues that you get, that comes in as part of your overall tax levy. As stated, it’s the same amount that’s coming in, you’re using that portion to pay the debt service on the bonds. The reality with these bonds is that the intent is that you’ll be utilizing revenues from the golf course, so you’ll likely be cancelling that portion of the levy anyway. Council Member Olsen said okay, thank you. Bonnie said so, you’re cancelling that portion of the levy. Mayor Bailey said yeah, because it’s getting paid off by the golf course. Stacie confirmed that. Motion by Council Member Garza to Adopt Resolution 2025-018, approving the property tax abatements; second by Council Member Thiede. Motion carried: 5-0. Mayor Bailey thanked Stacie for coming to the meeting this evening. 10. BID AWARDS - None. 11. REGULAR AGENDA A. Lochridge - Zoning Amendment and Preliminary Plat Staff Recommendation: 1) Adopt Ordinance No. 1093 approving the Zoning Amendment to change the zoning of 72.18 acres from AG-2, Agriculture, to R-4, Transitional Residential. 2) Adopt Resolution 2025-020 approving the Preliminary Plat for a subdivision to be called Lochridge, which will consist of 99 lots for single-family homes and 84 townhome units. Mayor Bailey said Samantha, our Senior Planner, will walk us through this one. Samantha Pierret introduced herself to the Council, as it was her first time presenting to the Council, stated she’s a new Senior Planner with the City. She stated that Pulte Homes of Minnesota is requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat and Zoning Amendment for the proposed Lochridge subdivision. The requesting compass is three parcels, totaling approximately 72 acres, currently zoned AG-2, Agriculture, to change to R-4, Transitional Residential District. The plat request is to plat 99 single-family lots and 84 townhome lots; the townhomes would be in groups of four and six units, situated side by side. The property is located south of the Woodbury border, west of Jamaica Avenue, and north of The Waters at Michael’s Pointe development. Outlots A & B of The Waters at Michael’s Pointe are included on Preliminary Plat City Council Meeting February 19, 2025 Page 5 of 23 documents, as there is proposed to be a recreational trail around Lake Robert; at the time of platting, The Waters at Michael’s Pointe, Outlot A, was retained by the landowner and planned to be dedicated with future development to the north, which is what we are discussing tonight. Outlots B & E were proposed to be deeded to the City; Outlot B continues to be owned by the Wolterstorffs and Outlot E is currently owned by the City. Outlot B, as noted, will be dedicated to the City during this platting process that we’re going through. Some of the members of the Council and the Mayor may be familiar that multiple development and plat proposals have come forward for this property in the past, from various applicants; challenges to development have included the presence of bedrock and Lake Robert, which have restricted the buildable area. So, the developer has submitted a landscape plan that meets our Code requirements, including the trees and the shrubs with a buffer that averages about 75 feet along Jamaica Avenue, behind the proposed townhomes. This feature will be similar to that at the Kingston Fields development, which is just south of here, on the east side of Jamaica. Additional Right-of-Way is also included on the plat at the northeast corner of the development to accommodate a future roundabout at the intersection of Military and Jamaica. The developable area was pushed about 150 feet west of Jamaica to meet County standards. The Lake Robert wetland and wetland buffer also impacts the developable area here and an area of bedrock, which impacts the ability for utility installation and will require some excavation and blasting. Due to all of those restrictions, the applicant has proposed a mixture of single family and townhomes; the R-4 Transitional Residential District is intended to provide these types of transitional areas that allow for that mixing of single family and townhome units along minor or major collector streets, of which Jamaica Avenue is one. This slide shows the proposed roundabout in conceptual phase for the Jamaica and Military intersection. Construction is anticipated around 2028 for that; as mentioned, the design requires additional Right-of-Way in the northeast corner of the development. This slide also shows an aerial view of the Jamaica Avenue corridor from the Woodbury border at the north to 70th Street at the south. An eight-foot wide trail will be constructed on the north and south sides of the new Ravine Parkway extension, and an internal sidewalk will also be constructed in the development. Access to the proposed development will be via Jamaica Avenue, from the east; Jamaica was designed to handle approximately 15,000 vehicles per day, and currently there are approximately 4,200 trips taken per day on Jamaica. At full buildout, the Lochridge development will add about 1,500 trips per day, so adding the 4,200 and 1,500, for a total of 5,700, is well below that 15,000 that Jamaica was designed to handle. The developer will be responsible for installing right and left turn lanes on Ravine Parkway to access Jamaica, and a northbound left turn lane and southbound right turn lane on Jamaica, to access the new Ravine Parkway. The developer will also be required to deposit escrow funds for future construction of the trail along Jamaica Avenue, going north of the new Ravine Parkway extension; this section of the trail will not be built until that rebuild of Jamaica happens, in 2028. During our Planning Commission meeting, there was some discussion on the difference between the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinances. So, just as a reminder for everyone, with the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use, the difference is that the Comprehensive Plan does guide the actions of the community by presenting a vision for the future, as well as the permitted density ranges for each Land Use type. All Land Use decisions must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, while the Zoning regulations specifically define how land can be used to implement the City’s vision found in the Comprehensive Plan. On this slide, it shows that the Comprehensive Plan designates the property as Low Density Residential and Parks and Open Space. The Parks and Open Space will be achieved by a proposed park on Outlot G of the Lochridge Development and that proposed trail around Lake Robert. The Low Density Residential will be achieved with the proposed density of 3.2 units per acre; Low Density Residential allows for 2-to-4 units per acre, as designed in our Comprehensive Plan. As a comparison for the Council, the Summer Valley Development was approved in 2024 with a net density of 3.14 units per acre, and the Graymont Village Development had a net density of 3.47 units per acre, so very similar to this proposal in front of you today. City Council Meeting February 19, 2025 Page 6 of 23 The Preliminary Plat is not requesting a Planned Unit Development (PUD); it is intended to meet all of the standards found in the R-4 Zoning District. Pulte Homes will construct the dwellings north of the new Ravine Parkway extension, lots south of Ravine Parkway will be retained by Rachel Development with a builder yet to be determined. The developer must also design the site so there is no increase in the 100-year high water level of Lake Robert. Stormwater from outside the development does flow onto the site, but it will be accommodated by the proposed ponds and storm sewers. Outlot G, as I mentioned before, will be established as a new neighborhood park, which will include play equipment and a shelter and parking lot; the parking lot will be constructed during Phase 1 of development construction. The timeline for all the amenities is dependent on funding, of course. Planner Pierret stated kind of getting into the history of the trail going around Lake Robert: In 2007, The Waters at Michael’s Pointe was approved for a Preliminary Plat, and at that time the City was operating under a 2020 Comprehensive Plan. Conversations at the time were being had to include the trail around the lake, as seen in the 2007 Staff Report excerpt on the screen; one section of the report does state that a trail around the Shepard Woods Pond, as it was known at the time, was not proposed. However, later in the same report, it was recommended that a future public trail be constructed around the pond. At that time, the property owner wanted to retain ownership of Outlot A, which restricted the City’s ability to plan for a future trail around the lake; however, the City did know that a trail would be planned for construction at the time the land to the north would be developed. Continuing the Final Plat for The Waters at Michael's Pointe was approved in 2011, after a few extensions were approved. At that time, the City was operating under its 2030 Comprehensive Plan, which then showed the future recreation trail around the lake. Today, we are considering the Lochridge Development under our 2040 Comprehensive Plan, which also still shows that planned recreation trail around the lake. Just as a few examples of similar trails in Cottage Grove that do get kind of close to some of the dwellings, we have Rolling Meadows, Hawthorne Pines, and the Calarosa 2nd and 5th Additions, and a couple of those are on the screen for you. The trail locations closer to dwellings around the City are the most practical locations to meet the needed trail connections. So, after the Planning Commission Meeting, staff did investigate various trail alternatives, as seen on the screen: We have the blue line, which is Alternative 1, constructing a bituminous trail on the east, west, and southwest sides of Lake Robert, with a boardwalk in the southwest corner. Instead of continuing the trail behind the homes at The Waters at Michael's Pointe, the trail would continue to the existing trail and sidewalk system on 67th Street Bay South; users would then continue using the sidewalk system there to Jamaica Avenue, which would facilitate a connection to the Lochridge Development and the new park. The green line on the exhibit shows Alternative 2, which continues the trail on the east-west and southwest sides of the lake; instead of running behind the dwellings, it would include a boardwalk being installed within the wetland to construct the trail that would connect to the east side of the lake. The red line shows the approximate location of the trail, as it was originally proposed. The original intention of the development was for the blue and red lines to be constructed. During the Planning Commission meeting, It should be noted a few of the members did only support construction of the blue option. It should be noted also that construction of boardwalks does come at a cost; boardwalks can cost up to six times more than asphalt trails, per linear foot, and they cannot be maintained year round, since plow trucks cannot drive on the boardwalks. Staff also acknowledges the impacts of the original trail location on the westernmost lot, where the lot would have had a public trail on three sides of the lot; so, staff has shifted that trail from directly behind that lot, instead to run diagonally from the existing trail stub to the blue trail, as seen. Continuing to discuss the proposed trail, there was a boardwalk proposed on the northwest side of the wetland as well; staff would prefer to see that this not be a boardwalk in this area, and instead have the trail constructed around the wetland, within the wetland buffer. The trail around the wetland would avoid directly impacting that City Council Meeting February 19, 2025 Page 7 of 23 wetland and, as discussed previously, would be a less-costly option. No wetland credits would be needed to construct the trail on the land around the wetland. The boardwalk on the southwest side of the wetland that I mentioned a couple times will need to be constructed to avoid negative impacts to the wetland; the alternative here is to obtain wetland credits and permits to fill the wetland and install a bituminous trail in that area. This image shows the existing neighborhood of The Waters at Michael's Pointe with the proposed trail in gray. I will acknowledge that the trail does show behind the westernmost lot; however, that would be situated differently, as discussed earlier. There are some distances in red that show the proposed trail would be no closer than 10 feet from the nearest rear property line. About 16 trees will need to be removed for trail construction, mostly consisting of unwanted species, such as Ash or Boxelder. The Parks Department does typically remove trees within 5 feet of a trail; however, the path may be able to be adjusted to save some higher-quality trees. During the Planning Commission, there was also some discussion about possibly adding some screening to City property or private properties to minimize the visual impact of the trail on these existing residences. Coniferous trees or coniferous shrubs could be added behind these lots, either on City property or private property, depending on the distance from the trail. The City and the developer will work with individual property owners on the best options for location of screening. There are some small sections of the trail that are lying in areas that are low lying that may be inundated with water for short periods of time with storms of 4 inches or more; this is also not uncharacteristic of other trails in the City, such as those at Hamlet Park, Pine Tree Park, and Pine Tree Valley Park. Various personal property has also been added to Outlot A over the years, as allowed by the property owner. The City will not accept Outlot A for public dedication until all personal property is removed. The development is also adjacent to the Shepard Woods Farm and its wooded trail system; there’s currently not a planned trail connection, hikers may wander through the Shepard Woods Farm to connect to those trails. At just under one mile long, the trail around the lake will be a great asset to the City of Cottage Grove and will facilitate a connection to the trails along Jamaica Avenue via Ravine Parkway. It should also be noted that the City acquired Outlot E at The Waters at Michael's Pointe in 2012, with the intention of constructing this trail around the lake. Just one last slide about the proposed development for everyone to see. The townhomes will be slab-on-grade; single family homes would be a mixture of walkout, split walkout, split lookout, and a full basement. Planner Pierret said with that, it is recommended that the Council Adopt Ordinance No. 1093 and Adopt Resolution 2025-020, and I will stand for questions. Mayor Bailey said thank you, Samantha. He asked if Council had any questions: Council Member Olsen said sorry for my voice, everybody, I’m fighting the grunge like about half the public right now in the State of Minnesota. So, if you didn’t hear what I said, I’ll certainly repeat myself. First, I have a question for Kori, as it relates to the slide that we saw that stipulated in one portion of the slide that there would be no trail, and then later on, stipulated there would be a trail. So, how do you reconcile that? Attorney Land replied Members of the Council, I actually had to read that several times. And, as you know, Planning reports are not always written precisely, and so I think the way I would have interpreted that is to insert, which I think makes the most sense. There is no trail planned yet, because then in the following paragraph, it said we do plan to have a trail around the pond, we just don’t know when; and then it was followed up in the Comprehensive Plan with a proposal that there would be trails around the pond. So, this clearly was intended for a future trail, it was not articulated as well as it could have been in the Planning report, but it just wasn’t planned yet is, I think, the only way that interpretation makes sense. Council Member Olsen asked and was there any signage that the City put out in the portion of this property that’s City owned indicating future trailway, or anything like that? Because when we do road stubs, as an example, City Council Meeting February 19, 2025 Page 8 of 23 we put signage that says this will be a future through road, it kind of lets people know at some point this will happen. Did we do that with this area? Does anybody know? Director Schmitz replied no, we did not. Council Member Olsen said we did not, okay. All right, so it was in the Comprehensive Plan, which maybe 18 people read, but it wasn’t signed; that’s a little bit of a challenge for me, frankly, if I’m a property owner. Council Member Olsen said the next thing I wanted to ask is you showed a slide with an alternate route. Would you please go back to that slide? Okay, so, it might be the cold medicine, I want to make sure that I understand what I’m looking at. So, down in the lower left, I can see there’s a trailway that connects with the red area, okay? And that red area is the original proposed trailway, right? Planner Pierret replied correct; the red one and the blue one were originally proposed. Council Member Olsen replied okay. So, the green, which is boardwalk in the wetland, I know that that came up in the Planning Commission meeting, too, and I think we all know those are incredibly expensive. They’re very difficult A, to put in, and B, to maintain, so it probably doesn’t make much sense. And now I’ve got Emily up, so oh, oh. I don’t feel well, so don’t beat me up. So, what is this blue that instead of connecting with the red, we’ve got the blue. What is that? Director Schmitz replied we still trust your judgment, whatever cold medicine you’re on. So, the blue is identifying a potential option that would connect to the sidewalks up at, that comes through this cul-de-sac. So, as Samantha had identified, we recognize that we needed to be cognizant of that proposed connection heading, I’m going to call it north-south, right? Council Member Olsen said so, then this would take the traffic away from those back yards, is that what I’m seeing? Director Schmitz replied exactly, correct, by connecting to the stub, as opposed to running the asphalt trail behind the properties. Council Member Olsen said okay, so, what conversations, if any, have we had with the property owners, the developer, staff, etc. about this as an option? Director Schmitz asked as far as extending or connecting the trail to be the sidewalk? Council Member Olsen replied yes. Director Schmitz said it’s been a topic of conversation that it is an option. Council Member Olsen replied okay, all right. So, that could potentially be a compromise to some of the folks who are concerned about traffic in their back yard, is what I’m hearing. Is that accurate? Director Schmitz replied that’s accurate. Council Member Olsen said okay, I just want to make sure the Benadryl’s not talking to me. One other thing I wanted to ask is when you look at this body of water, its not really like a super awesome body of water; and this might be a Ryan question, but I know that the Watershed is going to have to change some things in order to move water through this property, and with the bedrock, that can be somewhat of a challenge. What are they proposing to do here? I saw some of the ponds that were proposed, but would they also utilize this body of water as a holding pond, or what is their thought? Director Burfeind replied so, with this development, like Sam mentioned, there’s several points of water that come in from the Calarosa Development, to the west, to Woodbury, to the north, so it’s a big challenging. They do have a series of ponds and larger storm pipes that get that offsite water to this lake. It goes to the lake today, and it’ll continue to go to the lake in the same fashion; they won’t rate control it because that’s not a requirement. Developers don’t have to take offsite water and slow it down, that’s just not the way development happens. Their water, this property, also drains to this lake completely today, so, everything goes to Lake Robert; and then the City, probably in about 2021, constructed an outlet. This was always a landlocked lake, there was no way for water to get out. If residents are here that butt up to that lake, they remember when that lake kept going up and up and up and there was water in their back yards, and it eventually used an emergency overflow to the east. So, the outlet’s been constructed, so we now can control that 100-year high water level; and the developer has to meet all of the City, State Watershed rules for their water, and then they would just simply allow the water to move through their development to the lake. Future developments of Woodbury and the Kemp property would have to do the same rate control that they’re doing to make sure they don’t negatively impact the lake or the property owners around the lake. City Council Meeting February 19, 2025 Page 9 of 23 Council Member Olsen said yeah, you actually read my mind because we do share the pipe with Woodbury; so, I was going to ask that question. So, I think what I hear you saying is in the event of a “100-year flood,” we have planned for enough distribution of overland water, underground, using piping, that will eliminate the possibility that this water would come up right into the back yards or over the trailway. Does that sound about right? Director Burfeind replied so, this trail; if the trail were to be built behind the homes, it would go underwater in a 100-year floor, which would be expected. At the Planning Commission, there was discussion about the modeling showing the high water level coming up about 6 inches. Now, I think that’s a little deceiving because there’s multiple models and multiple phases of development; and I won’t get into that, but really this development, specifically, actually shows about a 1-inch increase, and we would continue to work with them to get that to no increase. That 6-inch increase was actually based on full development of Woodbury, but we would work with Woodbury to make sure that doesn’t happen. And I think there’s a lot that goes into a stormwater model, they’re very complicated, and this is a very large Watershed. Council Member Olsen replied I’m sure, and you’ve got to really be precise about the size of your pipe and where you put it and all the rest of it. So, and that did come up at the Planning Commission meeting, Emily Stephens brought it up. Council Member Olsen said two other things, real quick, one you can help with, and that is Jamaica Avenue. Now, oftentimes when we have new development, we will hear main street is a collector road and it can handle this many cars and all the rest of it. While that may technically be true, the reality is there will be a change for people who utilize that road to get to and from wherever they’re going; and that change is going to create a little bit more difficult ability to maybe pull out and take a left, which is already hard to do over there. It might be a little more difficult for people to cross over, I know we’ve talked about that before, doing a crosswalk and some different things. So, as we’re looking forward into the reconstruction of Jamaica Avenue, which has been on the books for quite some time, are we confident that they’re going to go back to the two lanes on each side? And the turn lanes in order to accommodate that additional traffic, and hopefully help people who currently live in the development still be able to use that roadway effectively? Director Burfeind replied so, in terms of Jamaica Avenue, I think what is really important is like you said, it is in our CIP, the County’s CIP for 2028; they do have an RFP out right now to start the consultant. So, that’s very much moving forward, that’s very solidified. In terms of what that road’s going to be, the County will do a full buildout traffic study, and they’ll build the road to what it needs to be. In terms of the number of lanes, that doesn’t add any convenience for the side roads; that’s just making sure you have the right amount of lanes to move the through traffic. Obviously, we did build a 4-lane section from 70th to Rose of Sharon Church, that was so preliminary, we didn’t want to be shortsighted. For the rest of the road, the County will look very closely at that, it could be there will be a 3-lane section with a dedicated left-turn lane; because, frankly, a 4-lane could just be way overbuilt and way too costly, which has an impact on City and County ability to build that road. So, like I said, they’ll do a full buildout traffic model, they will build exactly what they need to build. It will include turn lanes, and it will include a right-turn lane into 67th Street that doesn’t exist today; I know that was also brought up at the Planning Commission. That’s a new standard, that we add those right-turn lanes. Even though it can have the feeling of I can be rearended, at a 45 MPH road, they aren’t required and they’re not a mandate, but it is a County standard now and a City standard. So, that right-turn lane would be added at that time. This development would build the right and left turn lanes with the development. Council Member Olsen replied good, and I think that’ll give people some additional comfort, similar to what we had to do down at the golf course, etc. You want to give people that sense of security that when I pull out or pull in, I’m not going to have somebody right in my trunk. So, that’s great, thank you for that. Council Member Olsen said and the last thing I want to ask, and I’m not sure who wants to take this, is with regard to the screening trees, would the intent be to utilize like arbor vitae or kind of more of a narrow, taller tree to screen? Because there’s not a lot of space there, to be honest with you. When I went out and looked at the space with a couple of the neighbors over there, it’s a little tight; so, I’m just curious what kind of plant species would be utilized or best to give them that sense of security and comfort. Director Burfeind replied I can speak to that, initially, if there’s anything that Emily or Sam would like to add, they could, but we would want to use a coniferous-type tree so it has the year-round screening. And it is true that it does get, the trail will get closer to those homes, but the intent was to work with the developer, with the City Council Meeting February 19, 2025 Page 10 of 23 homeowners, right? If we do want to keep it on private property, it would have to be a smaller tree, which would provide a little less screening, or we could work with them to plant it right on the back of their property so you could have more of a standard coniferous tree; but I think that’s something we would just work closely on with each homeowner. Council Member Olsen asked and would we still do that for the other homes affected by the trailway if we went with the option that’s blue? Director Burfeind replied yep, so, if there was, let’s say just the blue trail, certainly that blue trail is behind some homes, so I think that’s something we could look at; I think the focus has been next to the lake, as Outlot E was always owned to connect to that cul-de-sac, I think even with or without the red trail. But that’s certainly something we could look at. Council Member Olsen said all right, thank you very much. I’m sorry I took all that time, but I know that this has been bandied about for years and years and years and years with different plans and different specs and different developers, and it feels like this one might be a little more real than the others; so, I certainly want to make sure if we do it, we do it right. Back to you, mayor. Council Member Clausen said I have nothing to add at this portion, but I do want to discuss, back and forth with us, when that time comes. Mayor Bailey asked, any questions down here at all? Council Member Thiede said yeah, just one, and I do recall seeing in the packet that there might be a little bit of wiggle room on the red trail going back there, that it might be able to, in some spots, be moved a little further from the lots? Director Schmitz replied it’s possible that that can adjust a bit here and there, but this trail segment was kind of chosen to preserve as many trees as we could. The intent as they physically walked this trail corridor, was with the intention that we could preserve some of the trees with this particular alignment. Council Member Thiede replied, okay, thanks. Council Member Garza said so, after I went and walked the area and got a sense of what it looked like over there and how the homes bumped up to the back of there, I started doing some digging; and because of what I do for a living, I was able to access a lot of records from 2011, when the listings were first put out there, when it was just land and not even the homes yet. And in those listings, it stated that there was a future trailway to be brought there. And what I thought was interesting, so, in 2011, when these plots were first advertised, they were advertised as a future trailway to be put there; but then, after it got sold, a couple of them were sold in 2011, 2012, and they were sold as land, that verbiage was taken away by whoever purchased the land. So, I thought that was interesting that when it was originally proposed and these lots were there, this trailway was there in 2011, it was proposed; and the developers then stated that to whoever would buy that land. But then after it got sold, and it started being developed and homes were put on there, that mention went away. And what started happening after that, I noticed, from being just a simple plot, a box, it turned into lakefront property. And, so, as 2015, and so on, those listings started changing, depending on who the listing agent was, and it started advertising it as lakefront property. But in 2011, it was not advertised as lakefront property. So, I just thought that was pretty interesting to mention, and that was just looking back at the MLS records of the listings and the different homes that were sold there. And then, while I was out there, I ran into a neighbor that was there as well, and they were shoveling, and they took me on a tour around that area. And they said when they purchased in 2011, they were told that there would be a walking trail put there, and they thought that idea had gone away because so much time had passed; so, they just thought the developer wasn’t able to do that. So, I just thought that was interesting that this had been told and people were aware of it, but not everyone was aware, and then anybody that bought after that initial development were sort of not told the truth, I guess. Council Member Thiede said, so as a clarification, the listing agent or whoever that was, was who is responsible for taking that out, right? City Council Meeting February 19, 2025 Page 11 of 23 Council Member Garza replied that’s what it looks like to me. When I did the digging initially, like I said, when they were initially advertised as lots and land, they were advertised as with this verbiage of a trail; and I have it saved on my computer, but that a trail would potentially be put back there. But then, as it got bought by different developers, that line just went away, and then when the houses were actually put on there, the listing changed to waterfront property. Council Member Thiede said so, it was the marketing. Council Member Garza replied, yeah, that’s what was interesting because those homes are still paying the same taxes as the rest of the people; so, they’re not increased for waterfront property, and that’s a notable thing as well. So, these are the little things that I found while I was digging. Mayor Bailey said I have a couple quick questions or maybe a comment, but one of the questions, Ryan, on that newer development where that pond is, I’m assuming if I saw right on the main development, that is going to have access for us to get back there, correct? Director Burfeind replied yep, that’s correct, Mr. Mayor; any of the development ponds, they all have to have a City Outlot access. So, there’s requirements on how many, based on the size of the pond, and it’s City-owned property to get to them. Mayor Bailey asked and do you know, because this has come up in other developments, too, do we know if that particular pond is actually going to hold water? Director Burfeind replied yep, that’s correct; so, the ponds in here do all have to hold water because its in our wetland protection area, so they’re not allowed to infiltrate. There might be some filtration cells that don’t have it, but in general, they do. And you’re probably bringing that up because we’ve had issues over the years; we’ve made changes to our standards to help address that in some simple but pretty cost-effective ways, like actually putting topsoil down first, then the clay liner. So, we’ve been trying to make some small changes to help make sure these ponds are actually holding water. Mayor Bailey said okay, sounds good. And then on the picture, I don't know if this is for Sam or Emily, on the picture with the blue trail that you were referencing, our intent all along, I’m assuming, please tell me if I’m wrong, was to go with the red; but the point is that you were saying that if we decided not to do something in the red, you could do the blue. Is that correct? Director Schmitz replied that’s exactly it, we wanted to provide some options. Mayor Bailey said okay, the second question I had for you, though, is all of the land behind these homes will be park property, correct? Director Schmitz replied mayor, that’s correct. Mayor Bailey said and so, we’ll be putting our markers or whatever that we normally put in to identify that this is a park? Director Schmitz replied yep, as the Outlot would be dedicated to the City, we always place those markers on property corners to make it very clear its park and open space. Mayor Bailey said okay, and so, that means on some of those other slides that you showed where there is encroachment items, those will be removed one way or the other, they’ll have to be? Director Schmitz replied yep, prior to the City accepting that Outlot as dedication from the developer, the developer will be responsible to work with those homeowners to get any of those encroachment items off of that Outlot. Mayor Bailey said okay, and I know we’ve been having, as Zac is keenly aware, we have these issues in park property all around the City that we require; I mean, we literally, if I recall one particular situation somebody had to pick up a slab shed or building and move it off of the park property because it was in park property, it was required by law. And, so, I just throw that out there for anybody that has some of the extra stuff back there; no matter what’s decided from a trail standpoint, we can talk more about that individually, as a group here in a little bit, after we hear from the public. But I just wanted to make sure I was clear on that. Mayor Bailey asked any other questions from Council for staff? None were asked. Mayor Bailey said I know the developer is here, does Council have any questions for the developer? There were none. City Council Meeting February 19, 2025 Page 12 of 23 Mayor Bailey said though there was a Public Hearing at the Planning Commission, I definitely appreciate hearing from the public on any of these issues. So, what I would ask, I didn’t get the sheet, so I don't know if everybody signed up on the sheet. What we’ll do is if you want to speak on this item, I’ll just ask that you come up to the podium, just state your name and address for the record; please limit your time to 3 minutes. And then what we’ll do is if there’s certain questions that come up, what we like to do in these situations is to have our staff take notes, and then we’ll like answer all of the questions at the end. So, we can kind of hear, there might be some of you that have the same question or same comment, so, we’ll kind of go from there. At this point, if someone would like to come up and speak on this topic, they’re welcome to do so at this time. Jason Johnson, 8714 67th Street Court South, Cottage Grove, said Mayor, Council, you know, we purchased our house; to make it clear where I am at, I’m off of the block there, E, whatever you want to call that, so, we back up to that. When my wife and I purchased this property, we did our due diligence, we did notice its on park property, and we started making some phone calls; you know, is this actually going to have a trail? What is the use of this back here? And we were told, you know, from the City, I can’t tell you who, but hey, there was not going to be a trail back there. We’re like hey, this is the perfect home for us, you know, so we purchased it. And it isn’t because of the lake, I mean, if you guys, if anybody has spent any time near that lake, it’s nothing special. So, we didn’t buy it to look at the lake, we bought it because of the privacy and what we got for the money we paid to purchase that home. With this happening, this really changes everything that we’ve saved for, worked for, and wanted to have. So, that trail, even though it is park property, Cottage Grove property, it’s still something that’s, you know, we did our research and thought, hey, we were told by the City, I don’t know if they looked at the same stuff you did, Garza, but I don't know. Somebody said it wasn’t going to be that, and now it’s changing. So, that’s really a big kick to what we’ve wanted here. So, I ask that people really think about what we’re spending the time and money to build a trail around, and what I find interesting about this whole deal is, you know, it’s about the development that’s going up there, and this whole thing’s really been focused around a trail. You know, and I get that’s part of the development and how to get things paid for, I don't know how it gets paid for, I don’t dig in that deep. All I’m asking is to think about the homes and stuff that you are affecting in the neighborhoods and the privacy and the security that we do have; because it is a pretty, the loop is going to go back through the woods there, and you know, anybody can get back there. So, that’s our back yards that butt up to the park property, I’m well aware of that, but you know, it’s just something to think about, and my 3 minutes is probably up, so. Thank you very much. Good Evening, I’m Kristel Rogers. My husband, Eric, and I live in the development, and if you actually could pull up the slide with the housing, because I think it would be easier to just point it out; I’m a visual person, as an optometrist. Our house is 8844 67th Street Bay South, so, we’re the house on the furthest, down on the left side here. We’re by far impacted the very most of all these homes. We purchased our home in 2021, shortly after COVID and a lot of stress as a business owner in Cottage Grove, and trying to survive all of that; we decided that we were interested in putting a swimming pool in our back yard, which originally was supposed to be in our house in Cottage Grove, in a different neighborhood. And then, all of a sudden, we found out from a friend of ours that lives in this neighborhood that this house was going up for sale, and so we looked at it, and within 48 hours we had put an offer on it and had a house to move into and had to get ours sold immediately. So, doing some research after moving in on the lot and where the lines were, we did come across this proposed 2040 Comprehensive Plan and called the City at that time and asked them, is this actually going to happen, that this path here could come up? And they said, I don't know who I spoke to, it was a female, and she said no, that land isn’t conducive, due to flooding that’s happened, for a trail there, so there’s no plans for that. So, that was just 3 years ago, 4 years ago now, and so, I mean, we did know that there was that path that already kind of started by our driveway there, on that south side, southwest side, but there could be a path eventually going through the wooded area; but there was no inkling in our minds that there was going to be a path literally within 10 feet of our property line, which is what the proposal is, I think, 10-to-15 feet from the start of the path to our property line. So, we would be significantly impacted if that red line proposal went in because three sides of our home would be visible. So, Eric and I, we understand we do have to come to a compromise on things; as a business owner, I’ve learned that over the years, you’ve got to compromise on things. We are okay with the path going along our driveway and along the existing 67th Street Bay South, usage of the existing sidewalk, I think the color on there was blue, if I remember City Council Meeting February 19, 2025 Page 13 of 23 correctly. But we really, really, really, really ask you to consider the privacy of our home with our children, teenagers, and a lot of people coming back and forth on that pathway. I know that there are paths in the area, and there’s other houses that have been developed on paths, and it’s not necessarily a bad thing; I think the difference is that we didn’t purchase the house knowing that there was going to be a path vs. if you do, and there’s already a path existing there, you’ve accepted that as a homebuyer, and that was not something that was on our radar as being in the plan. So, I guess I would just ask you to kind of consider the houses that are already there and have been existing a long time, and think about it if it was your own property that you’d invested in for some time. So, thank you for hearing us out, and I hope you consider that when you guys make your vote, so. Mike Miller, 8860 67th Street Bay South, I have enough to go for about 20 minutes, so it’ll be hard cutting it to 3, but I live right on the lake. I was told directly by the developers I know who told you or put it in the records to change that to say lakefront property, we were told by the realtors, by the developers, that this was lakefront property. We were told there will never be a path. You can tell by where the trail butt ends are, that’s where we were told the path would go, it would come up our street, along the park, along the sidewalk, and go through. The path directly behind our houses takes away our privacy. We did pay, we do pay more taxes because our houses are worth more because our property, the land we bought cost more; so, we are paying more taxes than most other people in the neighborhood. This is not a destination path, that was sold at the Planning Commission that this is a place where everyone in Cottage Grove is going to walk around this lake. You’ve all walked the lake, it is a swamp, it’s covered with Lily Pads almost the entire summer. So, I would say if this is going to be sold as a destination, then the City needs to work on improving the quality of the lake water, removing Lily Pads, potentially dredging the lake because its, I mean, I do an ice rink on the lake, and gosh, it’s probably 5, 6 feet deep at best. The waterfall no longer comes to the lake, we used to have it when we first moved in, in 2014; there were all kinds of Wood Ducks, and I mean, we’d see Bald Eagles and all that stuff, that stuff is no longer present in the area because the lake is overrun with Lily Pads. So, I’d strongly, my preference would be like the Rogers, the original path that we were all told that it was coming out around the, on the sidewalks; you know the difference between our path and the path in the rest of the community is, when they bought their property, it’s in their plat, they see where the trails go. When we bought ours, we were told there’s never going to be a path here. It destroys our privacy, which is why we live where we live. Thanks for listening. Good Evening, Mayor and Council, Kim Sommerland, 8710 67th Street Court South. A lot of the focus has been on The Waters at St. Michael's Pointe, and just to be clear, it is also impacting our homes that are in The Preserve. So, right now, our home butts up to the property on Outlot E, but it also has some of the same impact, right? I mean, we have lived there without a trail for over 12 years, and again, as some of our neighbors have alluded to, you know, it’s different if you’re building a development and putting in a trail, and people are buying that, knowing its there. We have bought that and lived without that amenity for over a decade. Other concerns that neighbors have brought up, too, are the privacy and the safety. I mean, the area, and again, all this focus has been on just that portion, there’s been no discussion, really, about how the trail comes around on the west and south sides, which would be more of our property, and how secluded it is out there. And what’s the cost, too, to put a path through all of those trees? There’s a number of trees, I looked at some of the information provided by the developer, and I have to imagine that’s going to be pretty costly; and if you are going to make a decision to put that path through that area, that you know exactly what that cost is. Maybe the developer gets credits, but it’s still at a cost to the City, it’s not like it’s free to us as taxpayers; it just means that they’re giving us less, maybe it’s less or more park dedication money or that sort of thing, so the park’s going to take longer to build. Another thing that I noticed when I was looking at some of the information is yes, in the Comprehensive Plan that it indicates that there is a path around a lake, and not that it helps my argument because I don’t really want it to go on the south side of the lake; but alluding or going back to the Planning Commission, they talked about wanting to have a loop immediately around the lake, that’s not what the Comprehensive Plan shows. So, I mean, there’s alternatives, right? You don’t have to follow it per se, and even if you were following it exactly as it shows in the Comprehensive Plan, that is not immediately around the lake. So, you know, there’s other alternatives. I guess I would just ask the Council consider some of those alternatives. You know, maybe the path goes along the north side of the lake and up into the neighborhood and loops around that way, so, you can still have a loop, but it’s not going through the woods where City Council Meeting February 19, 2025 Page 14 of 23 it’s going to be very costly. So, I would just ask that the Council really consider and explore other solutions with respect to the established character of our community and be fiscally responsible. Thank you. Mayor and Council, Kevin Sommerland, 8710 67th Street Court South. My wife just spoke, she speaks a lot more eloquently than I, so I apologize. She certainly addressed all of my concerns as well. One thing I would like to add, or a couple of things, actually. In addition to, quite honestly, opposing that trail going through the back of our lots, not only in The Preserve, but certainly here on Michael’s Pointe as well, and this is a very good alternative, I think, to utilize the sidewalk and avoid the back yards of those lots at St. Michael’s. Unfortunately, there hasn’t been an alternative proposed for us on The Preserve, which I would ask that the Planning Commission look at and bring to you. But, also, I want to address the larger proposal and plat; that area that they’re looking to put in upwards of 160 homes, I believe it is, 99 single family and then the 84, whatever it was, townhomes, that’s a huge influx of people. Those lots are very small, it really should be, in my opinion, looked at, just the density of it is overwhelming in my mind for an area that right now has been preserved and protected. But with that influx of people, I know they talked about the turn lane that would be created into that new development, but I don't know if it was made clear whether or not that turn lane would be extended down into 67th Street now. So, I would ask if that isn’t part of the proposal, that that be added as well to accommodate our access onto Jamaica Avenue. Thank you. Bonnie Matter, 6649 Inskip Avenue South, Cottage Grove, Minnesota, 55016, said thank you very much, Mayor and Council Members, I just have a few questions, and I think it’s more for the developer. Question #1 has to do with the blast plan. I know that there’s bedrock up there, I don’t know for sure where it is, maybe someone can put up a map when they answer this. I’d like to know how often they will be blasting, and how will we be notified up on our end, and when’s it going to happen, how often will it happen, etc., where will it happen? Secondly, I’d like to see where the wetland is, and I would strongly oppose any purchase of credits to mitigate that wetland. I would hope that that wetland could be kept. I’d like to know where the two exits are to get in and out of this development, because it’s my understanding we require two exits to get in and out. And I don’t understand yet, after all the discussion tonight, maybe it doesn’t have to happen tonight, and I don't need to know, but which trail are you picking or aren’t you picking, you’re just talking about it? Those are my questions, thank you. Good Evening, Tony Khambata, 7515 74th Street South, Cottage Grove. As I look at the possible options for trail, I guess my question is the cost of the boardwalk, right; so, is the alternative option more expensive, and would you make similar considerations for any other neighborhood? So, I would want, if I was in any given neighborhood, I would want to be treated equally. So, then I have to ask, you know, if this was any other neighborhood, would we make an exception for them? Because, you know, if you make an exception now, or for this one, then that sets a precedent. So, and then there’s the cost factor, right? So, does the other option, is it less expensive? Because then that might, that’s a legitimate reason without making an exception for, you know, aggrieved property owners, that’s a justifiable reason to go with an alternative plan, I would think. And then, lastly is, it appears that whoever owns that land now, prior to that Outlot being dedicated, they’re land is being trespassed upon. So, you know, I think while, if I was in this neighborhood, I would be frustrated by this. You know, I think the property owner who currently owns it, you know, if they had wanted to could have, you know, made similar, you know, like they could already have a trail back there, they could be riding dirt bikes back there. So, I don’t think the City wanting to put a trail in there adversely affects these property owners any differently than if the current property owner were to be using their land in a legal way. That’s all I have. Mayor Bailey said with that, I’m not sure who wants to; there were some questions, some more just comments, but I don't know who wants to take what piece of it before we talk some more. Director Burfeind said I’ll go first with some of the engineering questions, and then I think Emily can cover the density question as well. So, in terms of the cost, there was some discussion about the costs of the trails if we did pick or go with the red alignment, while there certainly is cost if you’re going to go through a wooded area, there’s tree removal, that’s not unusual or different than any other trail that we build; they cost about, in general, $60 a foot for construction; City Council Meeting February 19, 2025 Page 15 of 23 so, if this is 600 feet, you know, you’re $30,000 or $40,000, so that’s your scale, right? But that is the cost to build trails, right? If we want to have trails to use in our town, there’s a cost to build them; nothing here is unusual or different. The boardwalk would be, right? So, there was a question of what is that; it’s 6 times more expensive, so, you’re looking at $180,000 to $200,000, just to have that section of trail, and not any of our boardwalks today really cross something, like it crosses Hamlet Pond, right? That’s the only way to cross a pond is through the boardwalk; so, it is a very much more costly endeavor to have that boardwalk in that situation. Director Burfeind said the other, I think more specific, question regarding traffic and the turn lane; so, like I’d mentioned before, the turn lanes would be built, that is standard, we can require developers to build turn lanes into their development, which we would do. They will be reconstructed in a matter of three years; that’s not something that’s proposed for 67th Street right now. That’s not something we can really force the developer to build a different turn lane at a different intersection down the road because, like I said, the right turn lane, while it certainly has safety benefits, its not a standard or mandated or like a safety requirement. You can go all over Cottage Grove, Woodbury and find 45 MPH roads without the right turn lane because you have the Right-of-Way, right? Unless there’s a person in a crosswalk, if you’re taking that right turn, you’re not waiting for anyone, you’re not coming to a stop at an intersection, like you would if you were doing a left turn, which is why there is a left turn, and even back then, there was that left turn built into that development. So, for 67th Street Bay, it would be in 2028 that a right turn lane is proposed. Mayor Bailey said and that’s why I think I wanted to make sure that that message got across; so, there is a plan for that turn lane, but it will be as part of the reconstruction of Jamaica. Director Burfeind said and I spoke with the County Project Manager and just discussed that I’m speaking correctly, and they do agree that is something that they would plan to have in the scope of that project in 2028. Director Burfeind said I’ll let Emily speak on the density. Director Schmitz said Mayor, Council, I just wanted to go back briefly to where we talked a little bit more about density, and I thought Samantha did a good job, but I thought it should be reiterated. When we look at properties, she had a good image in here; it might look a little bit more dense because its scrunched due to the additional Right-of-Way, we’ve got a large portion of park, right? But when we use the Land Use Density that’s outlined in our Comprehensive Plan, it’s important to note that’s how we guide our development, that’s how we guide the number of units that are permitted on a certain property as a part of development. So, comparing to a Summer Valley project or a Graymont Village project, which is all single-family homes, right? But that density equals out between this project and those other two projects. Mayor Bailey said Emily, I don't know if this is for you or who it was, I think there was a question about blasting. Who wants to? I know we’ve had this at least one other time in Cottage Grove, it’s where I grew up. Director Burfeind said Mayor and Council, I can speak in general, I don't know if there’s really any more details at this time on blasting. Blasting only sounds scary; it is a very common practice to deal with bedrock, we’ve done it multiple times all over the community, many developments recently. Developments in actually much closer proximity, Hamlet Heights, for example, that was down at the dead end of Hamlet Avenue, right next to existing homes, Pine Hill Elementary, all blasting to do their work. We actually did blasting when we put the box culvert in, under Jamaica, with the flume, we call it, right by Renewal by Andersen; so, right next to the glass facility, that was all blasting. There are proximities, right, for homes; we would work and the developer would work with a Geotechnical Engineer. Given where the bedrock is, there might not even be notifications needed because the vibrations that anyone even could feel would likely be further away. With those other projects I mentioned, there were homes within 100 feet of the blasting going on; and, actually, blasting is a much lower impact than the other option, which is a hydro hammer, where they’re banging away all day on that rock. That’s actually more impactful, it doesn’t sound as scary as blasting, but blasting is quite often the better, quicker way to go because it’s one impact and then they’re done, so. Like I said, I can’t speak to the details of what this will be, that would be further on, in the Final Plat stage, but it’s a very common practice. Mayor Bailey said okay, sounds good. City Council Meeting February 19, 2025 Page 16 of 23 Director Schmitz said Mayor, Council, I had one more note that I wanted to make; there was a question about which trail alignment per se this evening is being determined before you, and the plans that are in your staff report as a part of this resolution identify that trail to be behind the homes, that red segment that you saw before you. So, I just wanted to make note that is what’s in the plans as part of this development currently. Council Member Olsen asked can you explain the cost differential between the two options? Does that number even exist at this point? Director Burfeind asked is this the difference between a boardwalk and trail, or between the blue and the? Council Member Olsen replied no, between the red and the blue. Director Burfeind said I think one thing that’s important, unless the City Administrator would like to add. Administrator Levitt asked staff, could you go back to the original slide with the aerial photo on Michael’s Pointe on 67th Street? Mayor and Council, one clarification, as staff has shown you the blue alignment as some of the residents have indicated, you can see that the concrete sidewalk is in place; that was actually constructed during the Michael’s Pointe development, so that sidewalk already exists and it connects out to Jamaica Avenue today. So, as you can see, and I think the resident noted it, where the sidewalk ends at the end of the cul-de-sac, where it ties into Outlot E, it’s very clear that it was to connect there. The resident was absolutely correct. So, if we go to the other slide that shows the shape of the Outlot, you can see the unique shape of Outlot E; you can see how the trail was designed to connect to the blue line. The intent was always for Outlot E to connect via the blue and the red because you can see we constructed the sidewalk, already fully in place; so, the only thing we have to do is connect that stub. As the resident indicated, it caused a lot of hardship for that trail to be immediately adjacent to their side property line; and so staff is indicating that we would be happy to relocate the trail and find a path more on that angle, but we also recognize that still may be providing some sight line challenges and lack of privacy. We would be happy to work with that resident to ensure that those trees of their liking are aided to screen their property. So, for clarity, 90% of the blue already exists and was always intended with the lay and the shape of the Outlot for it to connect. So, it’s interesting, when you look at this exhibit, look at the shape of Outlot E, at the water’s edge; that is no mistake for that shape to be notched out because the trail was intended for it to go behind those property lines as part of that plat. So, you can see that it was designed to go there, it was just a time until the developer and landowner could come to terms to be able to deed this to the City to facilitate that development. So, the decision before you tonight isn’t if its red or blue, the blue already exists and was already always intended to be there. I think the question that you’re asking yourself tonight is, is it the red trail, is it the boardwalk, is it no red trail? So, I think those are the decisions you have to make tonight, so I want to be clear the blue already exists out there. Council Member Garza said so I’m just wondering if the homes that are along the red trail that we are putting it forward, does anyone have a fence that is already built that is outside of their property lines? Is there any irrigation that is outside of their property lines that they’ve already installed? Mayor Bailey replied I don't know about fence, I know somebody had reached out to me that had irrigation. Council Member Garza said one irrigation, and I ask this because when we bring in people to put up fences and irrigation, all the things, we usually do some type of survey so that we know what our property lines are. And, so, I’m just wondering how that happened that they were even able to get an irrigation outside of their own property line? So, that’s just a question, I just wonder because I know that’s expensive, right? And then I see we have jungle gyms out there and some docks and those types of things; and even how the dock got there, I’m so puzzled with that, that someone would install a dock without contacting the City to say hey, is this permittable? And that was an expense, so these are my questions and I just wonder about that; and because these are homeowners and they’ve been there as long as they have, and they’ve put money into these things that they have in their back yard, I want us to be understanding of that, too. But still with the understanding that if I were to install anything in my yard, I’m going to call you guys to make sure I know if it’s okay or not, you know? So, these are my thoughts on it, that’s all. Mayor Bailey said yeah, and my question that I’d maybe have for staff on the irrigation, do we permit for irrigation? Administrator Levitt replied we do not issue permits for the irrigation. City Council Meeting February 19, 2025 Page 17 of 23 Mayor Bailey said that’s what I thought, okay. So, they could put it, and that’s happened where people put their irrigation onto the; Council Member Garza said right outside, and Mayor Bailey agreed. Council Member Garza said and the fencing, though, they wouldn’t permit for that, right? Mayor Bailey said no, so, it’s up to them and whoever is doing the fence; Council Member Garza said to make sure that they figure that out, okay. Council Member Olsen said in response to Council Member Garza, when I went out to visit with some of the neighbors out there, I did see one fence for the property with the swimming pool, but it wasn’t a large, what I would call a privacy fence or anything like that; it was very nicely manicured, looked great, but it was a lower fence. Council Member Thiede said it appears to be by the lot line, not extending beyond it; Council Member Olsen said no, it’s not, they’re in their own lot line. Mayor Bailey said but I think they’re required to have it around, so you have to have a fence around a pool. Council Member Olsen said but they did invest in that fence; Council Member Garza said exactly. Mayor Bailey said okay, so, we can just talk amongst ourselves, can’t we? I know we have to do a motion, thank you. So, I guess what I’ll just throw out there for the Council is, and I think our Administrator brought it up fairly succinctly about the choice. It’s funny because we’re here talking about a trail on the south side of a lake while we’re putting 100 and something homes on the north part of the property, which, frankly, I think some of us on the Council have been here for many, many years and seen different reiterations of what was going to be proposed there. I will make a couple comments for the homeowners: One is every development that I have seen come forth from Wolterstorffs up to this point had the trail there. Now, I will tell you this, Wolterstorffs could have easily cut those pieces out and sold them as part of the property. So, I think somebody made a comment about a realtor or whoever made a comment that these were going to be lakefront properties, and I’m sorry that that happened. I’ll just say that because we try as much as we can to put road extensions, maybe we’ll have to start looking at doing future trail extensions to adhere to that. With regards to the red trail, being that the property behind you will be park land, as this development moves forward. So, as I mentioned earlier, I want to make sure that was very clear; so, anything that’s back there, that you have out there, will have to be removed, one way or the other. The other thing that I’m going to share with you, and I’ve been doing this for a long time as mayor and have seen different developments. I kind of alluded to one of the blasting from my old neighborhood, where I grew up, everybody on our neighborhood thought that road would never go through, and there are homes down there. When I grew up down there, there wasn’t a trail directly behind my house, where I live. There is now a trail that goes from the street, directly behind the homes at Hamlet Park and works its way around. What will happen in your area, there is no way that there is going to be a person from those developments that are going to walk down to the blue, go through your neighborhood, and then cut back up to go to the trail. Because it’s going to be deemed as park property, they’re going to walk behind your house; we’ve seen it before, and I can give another example personally from me, Pine Tree Pond Park on the south side of 80th Street, we never had a trail there. It was kind of a trail because people made it a trail, and we ended up putting a trail there, and I got my phone blown up, people were upset that we were going to put a trail behind their house. We ended up doing it because it was the right thing to do, from a trail connection around that pond, and after the fact, the majority of those people, and I know Zac, you were there, were saying it wasn’t as bad as we thought. They liked it, they were actually appreciative that they got this access point. So, I know there were also some comments about possibly crime or something within the woods. I would just state anywhere in our community, we have numerous trails that go through wooded areas; Woodridge Park, up there, I can’t remember, what’s the one up above the hill, the development? It’s between Woodridge and above the hill, and so we have trails that go up and through there. I’m just sharing with you that this is going to be unique, having the access around with the new park that’s going to be there, it will be more than just your neighborhood, I get it. But I also don’t want you to think that if the decision was to not go with the red trail, that people aren’t going to be walking behind your house, because I guarantee you they will; because they did at Pine Tree, they did at Hamlet, and we ended up putting the trail in so City Council Meeting February 19, 2025 Page 18 of 23 it actually got people to stay on the trail and not be wandering into people’s yards. So, I just wanted to throw that out there as a comment from me, so. Mayor Bailey asked Council, any other comments? Council Member Clausen said well, I have a little different opinion from the way I think the Council’s going, but I did walk that area back there and many people have. And the difference here is that there were plans to do the trail back in 2011, and we’re now 15 years later. And you can look at all this property on aerial photos and you look at it on maps, but it’s very different when you get out and walk it. There are some great trees back there, they’ve lived there many years, and you know, there’s been some talk of it was in the plan, it wasn’t, let’s move on from that. But back in 2011, all this went to the various Planning Commissions and there were no objections back then to this, probably because no one lived there. I’m concerned about the removal of a lot of very mature trees that have been back there, and this was not a unanimous decision by the Planning Commission, and that never happens, I mean, it's very rare anyway. The neighbors here have offered some alternatives, and I think it’s up to us to give that due diligence, and I think that we should consider an alternate route than what was originally planned. I want the overall project to move forward, but I think we can do something with that trail to appease everybody. Thanks. Council Member Olsen said yeah, so, I appreciate Council Member Clausen’s thoughts, and again, I had mentioned I had gone and looked as well. And you’re right, it’s different looking at a map than it is when you’re standing there. So, what would you propose in terms of an alternate or some sort of compromise? Council Member Clausen replied well, the neighbors brought forward a proposal of let’s call it the blue route, and they seemed to be, if there’s going to be a trail, that seems to be the best alternative that they can live with and I think the City can, too. So, I would propose that we consider the trail to meet up or connect at the east and west ends of 67th Street. Council Member Olsen said so, then based on what Jennifer told us, our decision point is tonight, I think what I’m hearing is you are in favor of no red trail, is that right? Council Member Clausen replied that’s correct; Council Member Olsen said okay, all right, that’s what I needed. Thank you. Council Member Thiede said so, I have seen that area back there before. One of the things that, a couple lessons learned that I learned a long time ago is number one, if it’s something important to you and you’re calling somebody, like when I have to call the City or somebody like that and get something clarified, to actually find out who you’re talking to. I know that was a long time ago, but, you know, you kind of need to do that because things that are on paper appear to be showing that there’s a trail there. And there’s, even when I bought my house, it was a spot where the neighbors had actually finished like 10 feet into that lot; so, to most people looking at it, it looked like this scraggly, skinny, old lot, right? But so, they did that, though. I mean, for a certain period of time, we enjoyed a little bit bigger lot, right? With the way this development has gone, you know, you guys have been able to enjoy some of that property for over, probably 10 to 15 years longer than what was originally thought that might be. So, the other thing that I want to just make a point of is that this resolution if a Preliminary Plat, and you know, number one, you get that Lochridge Development moving and the planning associated with that. And like I mentioned before, we do have some time to kind of take a look at what kind of different alternatives that could be done and so forth for that trail. So, at this point, I’d probably be voting to move the resolution forward. Council Member Garza said so, Tony, when you came up and you had some words to say, it made a lot of sense. And I guess I don't know the answer to that question, if we have made exceptions. And, so, I’m intrigued to see because we have so many trails that connect our entire community, and we have existing communities, and then we weave trails through them, as you said, and they were established homes. And, so, you’ve had some pushback before from our other community members as well. Have we deviated from that, or have we made exceptions? Or, like you said, we put those trails in, and people were happy once they were there. Again, we walked this land, and I’ve seen the back yards, and I can understand not wanting to have a trail bumped up to your house; but on the flip side of it, I’ve walked plenty of trails in Cottage Grove that are backed up to people’s fences, no fences, City Council Meeting February 19, 2025 Page 19 of 23 pools, all the things. And, you know, I walk with my daughter, and we feel safe, so, I’ve not had any concern of these trails or walking through them. But I’m just wondering if this is something that we normally do, would we normally deviate or make exceptions this way? Or if there’s not something else substantial that could really change this development? Mayor Bailey said I’ll answer, and maybe staff will know this better. I am not aware of any. We went in back afterwards where there wasn’t a trail there, like Pine Tree and a couple, Hamlet, the ravine thing that runs down from Kingston, behind that. So, I just, and we’ve talked to the homeowners and such in some of those areas and you know, kind of got it in, along. So, I’m not aware of any that we’ve deviated and said that we’re not putting a trail here. Council Member Garza said thank you. Administrator Levitt said Mayor, Members of the Council, and maybe staff can bring up the image of the northern part of the pond because I want to make sure we’re talking about equity, right? We had talked about that, it was referenced. See the green trail there, it says preferred trail route, where does that trail go? It goes behind the new homes. One, the developer was interested in putting in the purple trail, which A, would cost more money, but they were willing to foot the bill; staff is saying no, for equity, we’re going to put the trail behind the homes, the new homes. So, when you think about equity of the neighborhood, that northern portion will have the trail behind the new homes, same as what was intended on the south. Now, Mayor and Council, you know as we’ve been talking here tonight, when you’ve been here as long as I have, you start remembering a lot of different examples, right? I’m sure you guys are running through your mind; I remember the time where we got this crazy idea that we were going to build a parking lot at Pine Tree Pond, right on the north side of 80th Street. Do you remember that? That was a crazy idea; who would’ve thought with that slope that was there that we could actually build a parking lot? And we were going to build a trail from 80th Street to Indian Boulevard. Do you remember? There were hundreds of properties, and there were numerous connections into those neighborhoods that had never had connections before, because, mayor, as you described it, there were all those footpaths through there, right? And can you remember when the bulldozer started pushing dirt down through that corridor, between 80th and Indian? Those residents were in absolute shock as we built that trail. And you mentioned it, mayor, who were some of the first people to reference the use of that trail? It was those very neighbors that had said we don’t want the trail, but yet, they were the first ones out there as their kids were learning to ride their bikes without training wheels, they were back on that trail. You saw them walking their dogs, you saw them enjoying the absolute amenity. But here’s an interesting thing, the mayor also mentioned this, Zac can tell you stories; when we did this, there was tons of encroachment, and there were hundreds of properties, and I’m not exaggerating, so if you look at an aerial photo between 80th and Indian, you’ll know there were hundreds of encroachment. Now, at that time, they all had to remove their stuff; the City did not offer to screen their properties, to provide trees, or to accommodate them. So, we provided nothing to those residents. Mayor and Council, what we are doing tonight is going above and beyond, A, to create equity in the neighborhood, as you see in this northern part, and number two, we are going the extra mile to help ensure that that screening and their privacy is maintained, which we have not provided for hundreds of other residents in our community. So, I know that you guys have lived through a lot of trail construction in your day and can remember a lot of those conversations, but we also remember that we are building trails and amenities for the 41,000 people that live here and enjoy those things. And those trails are what make Cottage Grove an amazing recreation destination. Mayor Bailey said okay, so, at this point, Council, I don't know if you want to switch it back to the two items. So, as it was mentioned, I think if I’m hearing right, at least, I don’t think from a true development standpoint, if you will, that there’s really any angst from the Council as it relates to the development. The only piece that was whether it was blue or red, and so, I guess at this point, the trail itself is tied up in the two things that are before us, in essence, correct? Well, not the zoning, the Preliminary Plat would be, is that correct? Okay. Council Member Thiede asked do you want me to make a motion? Mayor Bailey replied well, yeah, if you want to; yeah, go ahead, that’s fine. City Council Meeting February 19, 2025 Page 20 of 23 Motion by Council Member Thiede to Adopt Ordinance No. 1093 approving the Zoning Amendment to change the zoning of 72.18 acres from AG-2, Agriculture, to R-4, Transitional Residential; second by Council Member Garza. Motion carried: 5-0. Motion by Council Member Garza to Adopt Resolution 2025-020 approving the Preliminary Plat for a subdivision to be called Lochridge, which will consist of 99 lots for single-family homes and 84 townhomes units; second by Council Member Thiede. Mayor Bailey asked if there was any further discussion. Council Member Clausen said Council, I’m just wondering is there a way to move this forward without the trail location, or does that muck things up, so to speak? Does that put a wrench in things? Mayor Bailey replied well, I think what we heard, and I’ll let staff bump into this, is that it obviously, the whole development proposal, though, is part of what the plan is for the trail. So, where they stub everything in from the new development on the Preliminary Plat, where its going to come around the lake into our parcel, is all kind of tied together, so that’s why its in here. That’s kind of what I was getting to a little bit earlier is the first one is simple because it’s, we’re saying the development, the second one has that in there. So, we do have a motion and a second. The one thing I wanted to mention before the vote, one way or the other, is since we’re doing the Preliminary Plat, at some point you’re going to have the, should it pass, you’ll be able to have the conversation with the homeowners out there, looking at tree placement, whether it’s on their property, off of their property. The one that has the pool, who’s the one that has the pool? The Rogers, also in their particular case, if there’s something we can do around the side, even though we’re going to take that trail, should this all, one way or the other, we’re going to take that trail that way, but if we could do it at that angle, I like that compromise that we did there. But if we can also look at some of the tree situation to see if we can make that happen. I will mention to the homeowners, real quick, is we have done this before where we have done some plantings on private property; we go in and talk to the homeowners, we did it with the development of Walmart, we did it with the apartment building along Hardwood where we’ll actually go put trees on property, but we also do it on open space, too. So, I just want to mention that that is not unique, we’ve done that before in order to help any concerns with screening and such, so. An unidentified female asked what is the dire need to have that trail like right, literally next to the water on that south side? Is it the hill to die on to have that path when there is the sidewalk option? Could we ask staff why that is necessary? Mayor Bailey replied yeah, well, I guess what I would share with you is, and again, its been around for a long time, its been in the Comprehensive Plan, and its always been meant to have a trail that actually goes around a lake; or, I know some call it a pond, frankly, I think I’d call it a pond. We don’t really have many of these options around our community right now, eventually, maybe more as we jump across County Road 19 and get out more towards the ravine, there’s a lake back there. And, so, it’s a unique feature, along with the wooded areas and such like that back there. So, it is very unique, that we don’t have a lot of options in Cottage Grove for residents to be able to go walk in an area that’s as beautiful as that area is by; and I know you guys are, it’s beautiful, I know the area behind you, I’ve been over there, I’ve seen it, I know Council Member Thiede has skied it, behind that area, so that’s the reason. There’s been a plan for it all along, the goal is to connect directly around the lake. And as I mentioned to you earlier, and I’m very sincere about this, you will have people walking back there if you do not have a trail. They will walk it because I’m just telling you if it’s me and the trail is going to cut this way, and I know that that’s park land, I’m going to walk the park land because I want to be by the water. The unidentified female said are you still going to dig up all those trees? Mayor Bailey replied no. The unidentified female said but that would be by our house, though. Mayor Bailey replied yeah, it would typically be similar to what you see like at Hamlet, there’s still going to be some trees back there, but you’re going to see the water anywhere that you go around there, so I just wanted to mention that, okay? Council Member Olsen said with regard to the tree thing, one of the things we have in our ordinances is a Tree Mitigation Ordinance. So, whenever a development goes forward, there’s an inventory done on all the trees, and they’re given a value. Some of that stuff is pretty scrubby, some of it is pretty nice. So, they’ll all be given a value, and then the intent would be for tree removal to really focus on the not very high value stuff, and then when you City Council Meeting February 19, 2025 Page 21 of 23 plant new stuff, you plant good stuff; and we have a list that our City Forester can share with developers and property owners, etc. about this is what we recommend for our urban forest, as opposed to what we prefer not to have. Ash trees are an obvious answer to that because of the Emerald Ash Borer, but that’s how that works. Mayor, what I was hoping for is maybe Emily or Kori can talk about the difference between Preliminary Plat and a Final Plat and kind of how that process works. Attorney Land said your honor, members of the Council, this is one of the stages. The Preliminary Plat is obviously something that is a precursor to the Final Plat; there can be changes between the Preliminary and the Final Plat, the developer may make changes. Obviously, with some of these conditions, they may have to go back and make changes before you see it as a Final Plat. This isn’t the Public Hearing; the Planning Commission held the Public Hearing, so there isn’t another Public Hearing, although you are always so kind to open it up to comments from the public. So, if this still happens to be an unresolved issue, there’s always another opportunity to talk about it at the Final Plat. Council Member Olsen said okay, perfect. And I think it’s important for the neighbors to know that their voice will be heard throughout this process to help mitigate any concerns that there may be, etc. Ryan, you mentioned that the pond, which I think one of the pond neighbors talked about, it kind of gets Lily Pads and its kind of gross. Its going to get more water in it now because of the overland drainage field is going to become a piped drainage field. Will that have an impact on the quality of the pond? Director Burfeind replied in terms of the lake itself, or the pond, there was reference to dredging the Lily Pads; it is a public water that is permitted by the DNR, so, some of those improvements are not something the City would be able to do. This development, specifically, does have to reduce the phosphorus that goes into the lake. Council Member Olsen said, so, less algae, less green stuff. Director Burfeind replied yep, so, that’s the main thing is developments have to leave it in a better state than it was. So, that does help over time to have less algae, things like that. I don’t want to make big promises, but they are required to reduce that into the lake. Council Member Olsen said and I know the Watershed District gets involved in this as well, and there’s a lot of science behind it, but I just wanted to ask if it is going to get more water, is it going to be better, in general. So, thank you for that. That’s it for me, mayor. Mayor Bailey reread the second motion. Motion carried: 4-1 (No vote by Council Member Clausen). After the motion, Mayor Bailey said thank you, everybody. 12. COUNCIL COMMENTS AND REQUESTS Council Member Garza said so, it looks like we have some fun stuff happening, but I will not steal Strawberry Fest thunder, and I will only talk about our 2025 Easter Egg Hunt that’s coming up on April 12; that’s going to be at the Cottage Grove Ice Arena, and it looks like you can grab your tickets online, on our City website. So, that should be a lot of fun happening in the neighborhood in the next couple of months. Council Member Thiede said yeah, I guess I’ll go ahead and mention the Strawberry Fest. We had mentioned this at the last meeting, too, that there’s a purse Bingo fundraiser on February 22 at River Oaks at 11:00 a.m.; there are tickets online at strawberryfest.com. There’s also a Strawberry Fest Ambassador Scholarship Program candidate informational meeting on March 4, at 6:00 p.m., at Carbone’s. Again, the ambassadors represent the City of Cottage Grove, we provide a scholarship for them, too. They go around and represent the City at a lot of different parades and festivals and things of that nature, so that’s always nice. Council Member Olsen said for those who are not aware, tomorrow night at the Cottage Grove Ice Arena, the Park boys’ hockey team has a home sectional playoff game. They’ll be playing Two Rivers, it starts at 7:00 p.m., and you can get your tickets online, if there are any left, going through the Ice Arena’s website. Last year, I had the City Council Meeting February 19, 2025 Page 22 of 23 opportunity to go to the Cretin-Park playoff game, and I gotta tell ya, it was pandemonium. The place was packed, Zac and his entire team, including Molly and Jordan and everybody else, were working really hard; mopping floors, working the concession stands, making sure that people were getting taken care of, making sure that the event went as well as could be expected. There were a lot of long lines and that happens when the place gets super busy. So, if you’re going to go, I would encourage you to get there a little early, but if I can shake this nasty cold enough, I’ve got my two tickets, so I’m planning on going. Let’s go support our Park boys’ hockey team; second year in a row they’ve been in a playoff game, and prior to that, it was not often, if at all, for like 20 years. So, this team is really coming together, Coach Corkish is doing a great job, so let’s support him. One of my favorite times of year starts February 28, over at River Oaks, and that’s our Annual Fish Fry. You can imagine I don’t look like this because I miss many meals, so, definitely get in there and enjoy the opportunity to connect with your friends and your neighbors, etc. River Oaks is a great facility, we’ve got a really good chef, and good service staff there. So, get out and enjoy the Fish Fry, and I will encourage you to make your reservations early because if you walk in, you won’t find a spot; you need to either call the golf course or make your reservations online. Again, that starts on February 28. Somebody mentioned scholarships earlier. If you have a senior who lives in Cottage Grove, from either Park High School or East Ridge High School, I would strongly encourage you to let them know that the Cottage Grove Lions Club is giving away five $2,000 scholarships this year. We love to support our local youth, and the application deadline is April 4, I believe, for that. So, please let people know to apply. It was a lot of fun last year standing on stage at Park High School handing out scholarships to kids who had no idea they won; we called their name and they walked up. Additionally, at our first meeting in March, we will be doing the annual donation here to the Craig Woolery Scholarship for Public Safety. Craig unfortunately won’t be able to join us this year, he’s going to be somewhere in Colorado, skiing. The Cottage Grove Lions approved the donation of $2,000. My wife and I started this scholarship several years ago, when Craig retired, and we’ll be making a donation of $1,500. All of these donations go to the Cottage Grove Public Safety Board, and then they choose the winners. I believe last year it was three winners of $1,500 each, and these are for young people from our community who want to go into the world of Public Safety, whether that means being a police officer, a firefighter, or working in EMS as a medic, as my colleague did here for many, many years. So, again, make sure that they go talk to their guidance counselor if that’s something they’re interested in. We need good people in our Public Safety Departments across the state and across the country. And this scholarship is intended to help people who are interested in that, maybe get a leg up with books and those kinds of things. If you’re interested in contributing to the Craig Woolery Scholarship, you can certainly reach out to me, you can reach out to anybody here at City Hall. I know our Public Safety team is keenly aware of it or the Public Safety Board. Mayor Bailey said I just have one item I want to mention, which is kind of exciting. I’m just going to read my statement: “I am honored to have recently filmed the 2025 State of the City Speech, highlighting obviously some of the key accomplishments from 2024, and also providing an update on where the City is regarding our overall Strategic Plan and giving a vision of the City’s priorities, both in 2025 and beyond. I will say no one speech could ever fully encapsulate all that the City and our community does, but I’m always humbled by the work our staff and our dedicated residents do to make our City a wonderful place to live, work, and play. That video will soon be available, I think it might even be out there tonight on the City’s website at cottagegrovemn.gov/stateofthecity, but I’ll also let you know that there will also be a link in the upcoming edition of the Cottage Grove Reports newsletter and obviously on social media. So, there’ll be a variety of ways for you to view it. And, again, I want to thank all of our residents, our commissions, our staff, my Council colleagues up here, and all the partners, both elected and outside of our City, and obviously, the citizens of Cottage Grove for your dedication to our amazing community. It has been an honor, obviously, to serve alongside all of you here, and I’m absolutely looking forward to our work together in 2025 and beyond.” So, I just thought I would share that with you, and it is out, I got a chance to view it today, and so, hopefully, you’ll like it. If there are questions, obviously you can bounce those off myself or one of our Council Members here; if they can’t answer it, I’ll try to. 13. WORKSHOPS - OPEN TO PUBLIC - None. City Council Meeting February 19, 2025 Page 23 of 23 14. WORKSHOPS - CLOSED TO PUBLIC - None. 15. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Council Member Thiede, second by Council Member Garza, to adjourn the meeting at 8:50 p.m. Motion carried: 5-0. Minutes prepared by Judy Graf and reviewed by Tamara Anderson, City Clerk. 1 City Council Action Request 7.D. Meeting Date 3/5/2025 Department Community Development Agenda Category Action Item Title Planning Commission Meeting Minutes (2025-01-27) Staff Recommendation Accept and place on file the minutes from the January 27, 2025, Planning Commission meeting. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. Planning Commission Minutes - 1-27-2025 COTTAGE GROVE PLANNING COMMISSION January 27, 2025 12800 Ravine Parkway South Cottage Grove, MN 55016 COUNCIL CHAMBER - 7:00 P.M. The Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission was held in the Council Chamber and telecast on Local Government Cable Channel 16. 1. CALL TO ORDER Frazier called the Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Pradeep Bhat-Here; Ken Brittain-Here; Jessica Fisher-Here; Evan Frazier-Here; Eric Knable-Here; Derek Rasmussen-Here; Emily Stephens-Here. Members Absent: None Staff Present: Emily Schmitz, Community Development Director; Samantha Pierret, Senior Planner; Max Erickson, Planner; Riley Rooney, Associate Planner; Crystal Raleigh, Assistant City Engineer; Justin Olsen, City Council Liaison 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Brittain made a motion to approve the agenda. Stephens seconded. The motion was approved unanimously (7-to-0 vote). 4. OPEN FORUM Frazier opened the Open Forum and asked if anyone wished to address the Planning Commission on any non -agenda item. No one spoke. Frazier closed the Open Forum. 5. CHAIR’S EXPLANATION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS Frazier explained the purpose of the Planning Commission, which serves in an advisory capacity to the City Council, and that the City Council makes all final decisions. In addition, he explained the process of conducting a public hearing and requested that any person wishing to speak should go to the podium and state their full name and address for the public record. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND APPLICATIONS A. Holcim Mining Permit - MP2025-001 Holcim - MWR, Inc. has applied for their 2025 mining permit to continue mining operations at the Nelson Sand & Gravel Facility at 11250 Grey Cloud Trail South on Lower Grey Cloud Island. Rooney summarized the staff report and recommended approval subject to the conditions stipulated in the staff report. Frazier asked if there were any questions for staff; none were asked. Planning Commission Minutes - Regular Meeting January 27, 2025 Page 2 of 14 Frazier asked if the applicant at this time would like to add anything. Patty Bestler, Regional Manager with Holcim - MWR, 2815 Dodd Road, Eagan, MN, stated Riley summed up our application very well, it’s status quo, operating as we have for the last many, many years. In 2023, we implemented a suction dredge, its full y electric, where we’re trying to get overburden off of a previously mined area that was mined back in the 1950s and 1960s. We didn’t have the capabilities at that time with the clamshell dredge that we have now; so, we’re trying to go back, get that o ver- burden and excess sand off, we’re pushing it to other parts of the previously mined areas that we’ll never go back to. Our recla - mation plan is we are meeting the landowners, grades that they want for when they someday go to develop that property. The work that we’re doing with Great River Greening, where we’re establishing Oak Savanna areas and taking out invasive buckthorn and putting it in oak plantings, that is actually part of what the City agreed to, back in 2010, in lieu of us planting many, many trees down there that would not survive because of the dry conditions when we’d go through droughts and whatnot. So, in lieu of planting trees every single year, we are reestablishing big Oak Savannas right now; there is some on the eastern side that we’re working on, and then along the water area, in the area where we cannot ever mine because of historical significance, th ere is beautiful oaks in an area down there, but it’s being overtaken by buckthorn. So, we’re working on that this year to get some of that buckthorn out again. We did work in there previously, but we’re going back to that area now, too. I am here to answer any questions. I also have our Operations Manager, Michael Murphy, here if you have any operations questions, but pretty much it’s what we’ve been doing for many years now. We’re trying to eek every piece of sand and gravel out of that site, which is the purpose of the suction dredge. Frazier said all right, thank you. Are there any questions for the applicant? None were asked. Frazier asked Schmitz if this was a public hearing or not. Schmitz replied it’s technically not a Public Hearing; however, the commission does need to take a vote. Frazier said with the presentation by staff, as well as the applicant, he asked if there is any further discussion by the commission on the proposal. Rasmussen said I’m just glad to see your operation is going as planned. It looks like you’re increasing production, and the r ecla- mation is appreciated, so thank you for your partnership. It’s always nice to see things going well down there. Fisher said I was just going to say along the same lines as that, it sounds like everything is going well, this seems status quo for several of these renewals that I’ve seen. I like that you’re working on the invasive species and trying to really protect the nature that’s down there, too. Frazier asked if there were any further comments or discussion, but there were none. Frazier said otherwise, I’ll look for a motion. Fisher made a motion to approve Holcim’s 2025 Mining Permit, subject to the conditions stipulated in the staff report . Knable seconded. Motion passed unanimously (7-to-0 vote). B. Lochridge - Cases ZA2025-004 & PP2025-004 Pulte Homes of Minnesota, LLC has applied for a zoning amendment to rezone approximately 88.6 acres of land located south of the Woodbury border, west of Jamaica Avenue, and north of The Waters at Michael’s Pointe development for AG-2, Agri- culture, to R-4, Transitional Residential District; and a preliminary plat to be called Lochridge, which would consist of 99 single family lots and 84 townhome lots. Pierret summarized the staff report and recommended approval subject to the conditions stipulated in the staff report. Frazier asked if there were any questions for staff. Rasmussen said if I’m reading this right, it appears that Ravine Parkway needs to be extended through this development, that portion’s not there yet, is that correct? Pierret replied correct. Rasmussen asked is that something the City’s handling or the developer handles that development? How does that come together? Pierret replied I’ll invite Crystal Raleigh, with our Engineer- ing staff, to come up and answer those questions; being new to the team, I don’t know all of the answers quite yet. Raleigh stated the proposed Ravine Parkway would be designed and constructed by the development team; the City would cost share in that, Planning Commission Minutes - Regular Meeting January 27, 2025 Page 3 of 14 so the development team would be responsible for constructing our typical roadway section, and then the City would cost share for portions of the roadway above and beyond our standard section, so, the extra width, the medians, etc. Rasmussen asked so, would this extension just be completed until the end of this development right now, or? Raleigh replied that’s correct, and then in the future, the Kemp property is to the west of this development, and then as that develops, Ravine would continue to be pushed through to the west. Rasmussen stated all right, thank you. Bhat said as of now, Jamaica Avenue is only a single lane on either side, which is on the east of this property. How are you proposing to make that two lanes, going forward because of the anticipated increase in traffic. Raleigh replied Jamaica Avenue, I believe as is, is designed for that 15,000 vehicles per day. I am not sure what the County’s project that’s coming in 2028 would entail as far as if extra lanes are proposed on Jamaica. I think that’s still to be determined with their upcoming project. Bhat said okay, thank you. Brittain said if I recall correctly, Jamaica Avenue from 70th to Military was traditionally a four lane, two lanes in both di rections. Because this property wasn’t developable at the time, the curve of the road into the roundabout area that was desired couldn’t take place yet. Instead of reconstructing Jamaica when we needed to, it went down to a single lane both ways, with the intent as far as I am understanding, it will be two lanes both ways in the future when it becomes appropriate to redo that road; wh ich is not part of this development, but with respect to its history and its future, it is intended to be two lanes both ways eve ntually as well. Fisher asked can you explain, so we were talking a little bit about this, the 2040 Comprehensive Plan says it is R -1, Low Density Residential, correct? But it’s being rezoned to R-4, Transitional, but it’s still meeting low-density requirements. I guess I’m feeling like there’s some different things being used interchangeably, and I guess can you explain that a little bit better and help me understand why those two things are being used interchangeably? Pierret replied sure, I will do my best, and I may hav e to ask someone else. Fisher said I believe I know why you’re doing it, but I also want to hear why you’re doing it. Pierret replied all right, so the Low Density Residential classification on the slide that I just pulled up, it definitely has to do with that, the number of dwellings per acre and everything. It wasn’t to give a specific zoning designation to the lots, it was just to say this area should have that specific number of dwellings per acre. So, the Low Density Residential that are for, like I me ntioned, with the 2.9 units per acre still fits into the definition of Low Density Residential as it’s defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Fisher replied okay, so when you’re counting townhouse units, are those considered like if it’s a four, side by side, are those considered four units or is that considered one unit? Pierret replied those are considered four individual dwelling units. Fisher stated I don't know if my math is just not mapping, but it just doesn’t seem to fit the low-density number. I don't know, maybe it’s just the way the drawing is and how it looks, like it feels really packed and dense to me, and I am not sure why that is. Schmitz replied so when we calculate density, we use net density, so we take out all areas of Right-of-Way, areas below high-water levels, and so, in our Comprehensive Plan, when we think about Low Density, it’s two-to-four units per acre. So, we have a project that’s proposed at 2.9, that fits right into that density that’s outlined in our Comprehensive Plan. This parti cular Zoning District was created for the purpose of having that transition and that ability to have a variety of product types on perhaps a site that might have some unique challenges so that we could find that flexibility to allow for development, but also still meet that density standard. Fisher replied thank you. Frazier asked if there were any further questions for staff. Bhat asked so, it’s proposed to be zoned as R-4 because of the townhome units. Otherwise, it should have been in R-3 if they were just single-family homes in that zone. Pierret replied that’ correct; with those townhome units, that pushes it into the R -4 Transitional District with those differing densities of dwellings. Bhat replied okay, thank you. Stephens said I’ll try to keep this as far out of engineering as possible. I’m just wondering if you could talk about that stormwater that’s coming underneath. There always seems to be just a pretty significant swale through that property, and I don’t thin k the culvert’s all that big, but is there plans to just reroute? I mean, is it going to be piped or is it going to be overland rer outed down? Has that been discussed at all? Raleigh replied that has been discussed; I’m assuming, are you talking more of th e drainage coming from the west side of the property? Stephens replied from the north side; so, there’s a culvert under Military. Raleig h replied okay, so, it will come into that basin in the northwest corner, and from there it would be piped down through the subdi- vision into the big Pond 3 that you’re seeing there, up on the screen, and then it would discharge into Lake Robert. Stephen s replied okay. So, it’s going to go overland, behind the townhomes into Pond 2? Is that right? Raleigh replied I believe it’s going to be piped. Rausch said it will ultimately be in the storm sewer, it’s very hard bedrock there. Raleigh said so, it will be in the storm sewer, in the streets, to either Pond 1 or Pond 2. Rausch said that pipe is now in the watershed, the one in the northwest corner is much more steep. Stephens replied okay, I’m just curious about that, that’s all. Thank you. Planning Commission Minutes - Regular Meeting January 27, 2025 Page 4 of 14 Frazier asked if there were any further questions for staff, none were asked. At this time, he asked if the applicant would like to approach the podium and add anything additional. Good Evening, my name is Haley Daily, with Pulte Homes of Minnesota, 1650 West 82nd Street, Suite 300, Bloomington, MN. With me tonight is Dean Lotter, our Director of Land Planning and Entitlement, as well as Mark Rausch with Alliant , for any of the specific engineering questions, as well as a representative f or Rachel Development. I’m here to just answer any questions you may or may not have; we’re just excited to be in the City of Cottage Grove again. Frazier said all right, thank you. Any ques- tions for the applicant? Frazier said okay, I don’t see anybody, but I am going to ask, I think you said it was Mark you said was your engineering person? Daily replied yes, Mark Rausch with Alliant. Frazier said I wonder if he would come up. Sorry, you had just given an answer f rom the back, and I wanted to make sure we had you up here so t hat people at home can hear and we have it on the record. So, if you’d just give your name. Mark Rausch with Alliant Engineering. Frazier said all right, thank you. And so, there was a question from Commissioner Stephens specifically about where the stormwater ponding or where the stormwater was going, whether it was going overland or whether it was being piped through. If you could just provide your kind of update on what that was. Rau sh replied so there is a pipe, that is correct, th at picks up on the north side of Military that dumps out here. You can see it, but there’s a lot of riprap there, it’s actually where bedrock is actually physically disposed there. That’s, I think that’s only 21, it’s not as big a pipe; this side is what takes a significant amount of flow from Woodbury and more to the west of the site, northwest , so that is being captured in this basin, and there’s a larger trunk pipe that will follow through to this pond here. So, we will be collecting this, but right now, it’s just coming down the hill. We have multiple catch basin inlands back here to make sure w e capture that with the swale easement. All this common area of the townhome area drains into a drainage and utility easement, so, and it’s a managed property. So, I don't know if that answers the question. Stephens replied yeah, it does. Thank you. Frazier said all right, are there any further questions for the applicant? None were asked. Frazier said all right, thank you very much. Frazier opened the Public Hearing. Good Evening, Mr. Chair, committee, my name is A.J. Ecker, I live at 8852 67th Street Bay South; we’re in The Waters at Michael’s Pointe development, and we’re excited about this new plan and getting some more neighbors. We do have a concern, some of us that live at The Waters at Michael’s Pointe, along Lake Robert there, that we kind of went through this proc ess back in 2011 to develop The Waters at Michael’s Pointe; when we were working with the City, we were assured that a walking path was not going to go around the south side of the lake. So, a lot of us that built there and bought there were under that pre mise that the walking path would not go around that side of the lake. In addition to just, you know, the commitment we ha d from the City, knowing how the lake floods, and I know we put in different drainage there to help that, but sometimes we’ve got water halfwa y up our back yards. We’ve got neighbors now that have fences there, some of our biggest, most mature trees are , there’s not a lot of space between the property line of their back yards and the wetland. And, so, I know you talked about maybe an eigh t- foot wide trail going through that space, and in some of the back yards, I don’t even know how that’s possible to get eight f eet of a managed trail through there without not cutting down some of the most beautiful, mature trees around that lake. So, I ju st wanted to voice our concern for those of us living on the lake now; we would really like the City to uphold their agreement w ith us to not put the walking trail around that lake. Thank you. Frazier said thank you. Mr. Ecker, can I just ask you, and you don’t have to answer it if you don’t want to, but other than the conversations that you had with the City back in 2011 about this p ath, is there a specific reason why you think that a walking path on the south side of the lake would not be appropriate? Mr. Ecker replied well, I mean, back when we were in negotiations with John and Jennifer and the City, we just thought that privacy is one issue, but now, after living there for the last ten years or however long we’ve been there, it doesn’t seem like the spa ce is there from the wetland buffer to our property line. There’s just not that much space there for an eight -foot path to go through there, and some of the neighbors’ fences I believe are rightfully in their spot, but it can’t be more than 15 feet from th e water. And then there’s supposed to be the natural wetland buffer in there, and then you’ve got these big, beautiful trees. You know, somebod y came out and just staked, and these stakes go right through our yards, and some of these huge trees are right i n the middle of that. So, I would just hate to see, I mean, it’s such a beautiful nature preserve back there, to see some of these really longstanding trees get cut down. And, you know, I think it’s a beautiful place back there, and we’re excited about the development, there’s going to be areas to walk around and park dedications all over that you can still enjoy the lake without having, and I don’t believe the trail can connect all the way around anyways because of the, somebody on the other side of the, t he east side. But those are some of my thoughts, Mr. Chair. Frazier said all right, thank you. Planning Commission Minutes - Regular Meeting January 27, 2025 Page 5 of 14 Good Evening, I’m Kristel Rogers, I’m a neighbor of A.J.’s, a couple doors down, 8844 67th Street Bay South. Our home is on the end of the cul-de-sac, and our back yard would butt up right to where this walking path is proposed to be, literally within a few feet of the fence that we just put in around our swimming pool that we invested in the summer after we moved in, in 2021. So, my husband and I have been residents of Cottage Grove since 2011, lived in a different neighborhood, and then moved to this neighborhood, largely due to the privacy of the back yard and we were planning to do a swimming pool. In our previous locatio n, which was also fairly private, but it had a huge hill, which was a problem for that. So, when we found this place, we fell in love, and we said, you know what, this is a really private area, which is kind of why we decided to move there. Doing some research at the time, we actually noticed that there was this proposed plan for a walking path, and we had called the City at the time to confirm if that was or wasn’t going to happen. We were told, although on the phone, so I don’t have it in writing, but it was on the phone I was told that that land was not conducive to a walking path, and it wouldn’t be happening. So, we made the invest - ment to move, and we’ve been very happy where we’re at, and we’re quite concerned about the potential walking path that would be literally within a few feet of our private oasis. We don’t have another place that we go in the summer, like many Minnesotans do, to lake homes; this is our place, and being a business owner in Cottage Grove for ten years, and a practitioner in the area for ten years, we’ve made Cottage Grove our home and we really do like it here. We’re pretty disappointed that this is potentially going to come into our back yard. So, I’m hoping I can speak on behalf of my other neighbor s that we really would not like to have a walking path right in our back yard. I’m fine with the walking path to the west of our house, along our dr iveway, that has already started and going around the west side of the lake, but it really seems to be encroa ching a lot of homes and privacy to be literally within feet of a back yard that’s been private for that long for many. So, thank you. Frazier said thank you. Jason Johnson, I live at 8714 67th Street Court South, just a few doors down from these guys, especially through the woods th ere. You know, we started, we moved into this neighborhood in 2017, we heard that there was a potential of a trail that would go through there as well. We looked into it, called the City, and they said it probably won’t happen because the house across th e lake there is bedrock, and will never really ever be developed, a trail would probably never happen, more like never was the big word that was used. So, we decided to move in there; with our back yard, we don’t actually look at the lake very often, I mean, we can’t see it, we’ve got some trees back there, so it’s not so much the obstruction of the lake, it’s people in the back ya rd. If you ever spent any time looking at this lake, do some aerial, go back in time and look at some aerial photos of this lake, it’s not really even a lake. It’s mostly just covered in seaweed, it’s got yeast on it, it’s not super beautiful. In front of their homes, they’ve got a nice little spot there where they can see the weeds kind of come back into the west, southwest corner of there; but it’s not a, I just don’t think it’s a good investment for the City to even have around a lake that isn’t a lake. When I came to the meeting, the original meeting with Pulte and stuff, I was told by one of the City people that were there, I hate to say this, but we k ind of want to be like Woodbury, like Colby Lake. Well, my first thought is there, let’s have a Colby Lake first. We don’t have that there. So, also the water there; have we ever, has that water been tested of any sort? I only ask because our dog has gone back in t here a couple times and come back, and he’s a little loopy after he gets out of there. So, it’s als o just not, it’s not super awesome. So, I just, I don't know, it just seems like not a real good use of money and privacy; you know, we paid to have that back there, and now we have people coming in from the other side, if there is a park across the way, coming into our back yards. Our neighbor- hood is a diamond in the rough, we have a lot of spots, there’s not a lot of neighborhoods like ours, and a lot of us moved t here and love it the way it is. I get that there is change to support the build across there. Jamaica is pretty busy, but I’m sure that the County and the City will work together to make the lanes a little bit bigger. But, it basically comes down to I would like to see the trail itself not constructed due to what we’ve put into purchasing this home and the rest of the neighbors, especially on the south side of 67th Street and then the 67th Street Bay. So, that’s all I have. Frazier said, all right, thank you. Mike Miller, 8860 67th Street Bay South, I live right on the south side of the lake, next to A .J. and all these guys. Our little neigh- borhood is, like people said, it’s a gem here in Cottage Grove. It’s very private, it’s very small, we all know each other, a nd we bought there for the privacy. So, as far as the concern about how does it impact our community, there’s probably what, 45 hou ses in there, or whatever, it impacts our privacy. We paid premium prices for our lots for that privacy. It also, where the trail goes through, that is a wetland, so I don't know if a study has been done, if permission’s been allowed; I mean, that has to b e approved with the Watershed District. It is very low lying, and when it rains, even though the drain has been put in, our back yard st ill floods over. So, I’m most concerned about the privacy that we paid a premium for; we chose to live in Cottage Grove, not to live in Woodbury, right? We have tons of walking paths already, I would prefer not to have a walking path pretty much right through my back yard. We can go around the other side, we can walk out, I mean, our whole neighborhood walks ; we see these guys all the time out walking dogs, and we’ve walked out the beautiful path across Jamaica , it’s awesome, and we walked the partway. So, there is lots of Woodbury-like amenities in our neighborhood already. We would, our whole neighborhood, would prefer that the path doesn’t go behind our houses, it can go on the north side. They haven’t bought into the community already that we’ve lived there for 12 years, living in the privacy and the beauty of nature, even though like they said, the lake really isn’t t hat beautiful Planning Commission Minutes - Regular Meeting January 27, 2025 Page 6 of 14 because its covered with Lily Pads, like now is the most beautiful time and in spring, before the Lily Pads show up. So, that’s all I have. Thank you. Frazier said thank you. Chairman, Members of the Commission, Kevin Sommerland, I’m at 8710 67th Street Court South. Also, my property abuts the south side of Lake Robert if, in fact, you want to call it a lake; as has been mentioned, it’s more of a swamp. You know, we bought in that neighborhood in 2013 from Pulte. The representative that convinced us to buy there was really selling the privacy asp ect of that development. Back then, we were pre-Emerald Ash Borer infestation, and that area was certainly, I mean you couldn’t even see the lake initially from where we were, our lots. Since then, we’ve had to remove a lot of trees, which has opened that area up a lot. Dodge Nature Center recently has gone in and done a fair amount of clearing, and so, our level of privacy has diminished considerably just in the last ten years. And, yeah, to now be subject to any foot trail that is going to potentially bring people in there at all hours, and right in our back yard, certainly there’s some safety, security concerns that I would have. I think as a compromise, you know, if Pulte wants to have a trail on that north side of the lake and maybe circle around on the east and west with little roundabouts there, and just avoiding that southern side of the lake, I would have no problem with that. But I think, you know, just recognizing, as has been mentioned, our lots, we paid a premium for those lots for that privacy aspect, and now a decade or more after we closed on those deals, we’re being asked to give up that privacy. I think it’s just unreasonabl e. So, thank you. Frazier said thank you. Hi there, commissioners, my name’s Nathan Dean, I’m at 8715 67th Street Court South, Cottage Grove. One of the things I guess I’m challenged by as I take a look at the plans is, and I think some of the commissioners raised it up , is even the density that is being proposed. This is coming from an area that is very much single-family homes and a very tight area of which, you know, I’m raising four girls, and I can’t express to you how much I appreciate the safety of being able to ra ise my four girls in that cul-de- sac and I don’t have to worry because it is a very private, protected area. And Pulte did a phenomenal job of building that a rea at the time, and we are grateful for the privacy and the area that was created; but I’m a little shocked as we saw these proposals being put together at just how much density is being proposed, and I have to ask the question why? Like, is this the Cottage Grove that we understood, that was trying to develop all these single -family homes? I mean, the development that was just across Jamaica there, as it was being built out and had the single-family homes being built into it, that seemed reasonable, they did that in a way that seemed very much designed around the single-family home; and I guess I’m challenged as to well, about the walking path, and the walking path is a big issue in our neighborhood. But I’m more concerned about just the fact that this is being zoned at R-4 vs. R-2, that was part of that 2040 plan, I would respectfully request that that be reconsidered, even though I understand there are special circumstances of that land and the challenges to develop it . I think still having a lower density, single-family home mix would not only protect my home values, but it would also protect my neighborhood and keep it the private, safe neighborhood that I currently reside in. Thank you. Frazier said thank you. Good Evening, commissioners, my name is Michael Goertel, I live at 8717 67th Street Court South, and first off, I’ll say I definitely empathize with my neighbors and the concerns with the trail. It’s not my scenario, or my situation, but I absolutely understa nd the situation with that. I think the reason I’m here is I just want to call out the concerns with the traffic that’s on Jamaica, going southbound, especially southbound. So, as noted, probably five, or a little bit more, years ago, Jamaica was two la nes in each direction, and that was reconstructed when the roundabout on Jamaica and 70th was put in. For the most part, it’s a single la ne in each direction, some accommodations with the new Ravine Parkway going eastbound, as well as the development to th e east of Jamaica. What that accounted for was some extra turn lanes and things of that sort, but where my concern comes in is ensur ing that there’s some sort of road reconstruction on Jamaica, at least in between Military and I’d say 67th Street Court; th at’s the area where what I experience is coming southbound from Military to 67th on Jamaica , there is not a turn lane for folks to go right, into 67th Street Court South. And that traffic comes up behind you quite quickly, and where my concern comes in is as there’s more traffic and additional houses, naturally there’ll come more cars and things of that sort. So, I’d be looking for addi - tional, at least some road enhancements and things of that sort, so I don’t get rearended , as I’m trying to slow down and take a right into 67th Street, or I start turning my blinker on, up on Military, just to make sure everyone knows I’m turning right a half mile down the road. So, just awareness on that with the way the road is currently constructed. Thank you. Frazier said thank you. Frazier asked if anyone else wished to speak for or against the proposal. No one else spoke. Frazier closed the Public Hearing. Frazier said at this time, I will ask staff to kind of respond to some of the concerns and some of the things that I know they’ve had on their radar since the neighborhood meeting where specifically the trail has been brought up. Planning Commission Minutes - Regular Meeting January 27, 2025 Page 7 of 14 Pierret said thank you, Mr. Chair and Members of the Commission. So, yes, staff has definitely heard and understands the publ ic’s concerns regarding the privacy of the trail and everything. It was in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, as I noted, and also kind of speaking to those discussions, packets, approvals, things like that that went on around 2011 and 2007 -ish, when these other developments to the south were put in. Nothing was put on the record as far as the conditions or things like that that would hold the City into saying that no trail would be put here. Staff did considerable amounts of research on that front, as far as ver ifying that that would or would not be the case. As far as mitigating any wetland impacts and things like that, it sounds like that of course appropriate permits, minimizing impacts to wetlands, are going to be required, very important things, permits through things like the DNR, things like that for trail construction; and staff is looking at varying ways of trail construction and th ings like that with the applicant’s engineers as far as best practices, minimal impacts to those areas. Concerns regarding the density, kind of getting to Commissioner Fisher’s question earlier about the net density of the area. As I mentioned, it was not said that this area would be zoned R-2, it’s a density, it’s an overall net density that the area is planned for; and this proposal does meet that request, using the townhome density and the single-family density on this acreage when we subtract the acreage of public Rights- of-Way and the wetland lake. Kind of going into the traffic concerns and everything, that was also kind of mentioned during the presentation as well about the proposed hopeful reconstruction in 2028. It was also noted in the packet that this is a County Road, and it was reconstructed as the neighbors had mentioned ; it was reconstructed in a way that the County knew that they would need to be coming back here for reconstruction, sooner rather than later, as far as when new development came in and things like that. So, those will definitely be considerations as the County continues to go forward in their planning process es. Pierret said I’ll kind of send it back to you unless there are any questions. Fisher said I have a question. So, I’m empathizing with everybody on the trail, and something that was said really kind of st ruck me; like, it doesn’t seem like a very good use of money or space. Another thing that was talked about was lots of big trees that were going to need to be mitigated; can you talk about how many trees you would have to take down and what that would look like back there? Because it doesn’t seem, to me, that makes sense, that doesn’t seem to be a great like use of money and space, you know, if you’re taking down a bunch of big, mature trees and putting a path somewhere that floods all the time anyway. That made sense to me, so. Raleigh said Chair and Commissioner Fisher, I can speak to that. Some of the neighbors expressed concerns about the amount of space between the rear yards and the water’s edge. Staff and developer went together out there, and the developer’s engineer, to take a peek at those back yards and possible trail locations within that corridor. Back yard lot corners were staked, and in the narrowest location, there’s approximately 50 feet between the back lot corner and the water’s edge; that does allow some flexibility to avoid big back yard trees. So, the anticipation is that the trail can avoid some of those large trees that are in people’s rear yards. Now, the trail does meander through the woods and then there are some larger tre es in the woods that can’t be avoided, but generally, those bigger trees through back yards would be avoided. Fisher said I was just going to say I feel like there should be some sort of compromise here with the trail. Like I understand, I don't know, I’m not one to like be swayed, but I feel like there’s got to be some sort of, it sounds like consistently all of these people were told in the past by people that there was never going to be a trail there, which I know it’s not in writing, but I mean, it’s consistent that every single person has said that. The fact that just environmental, the fact that it floods, like I just don’t see this being a hi ll to die on; there’s got to be some way that we can make sort of a compromise on this piece of it because it doesn’t really affect the homes going in, it doesn’t affect the density, it doesn’t affect the overall construction of the development. So, I guess I would like to see some sort of compromise here. Raleigh replied sure, understood. I think the intention with this was to follow that Comprehensive Plan that showed us having a trail all the way around Lake Robert; so, that does generate that trail on the south side there. Fisher said yeah, but the Comprehensive Plan does, though, show that this parcel should be zoned R -1 as well, and we’re going R-4 because there’s some similarities. So, I think the Comprehensive Plan is great, but there’s some movement that can happen wit h it, and I think maybe we can consider that here, too. Raleigh said all right. Frazier said so, I guess, and maybe I can because I’m confused now, too, I think. So, my understanding of the Comprehensive Plan is we don’t talk about Zoning Districts R-1, AG, I-2, it’s just in terms of density; and, so, the Comprehensive Plan right now in this area is saying it should be used as Low-Density Residential when it develops, correct? Schmitz replied Mr. Chair, Members of the Commission, that’s correct. Frazier said and Low Density Residential is according to the Comprehensive Plan definition is between two and four units per acre. Schmitz stated that’s correct. Frazier said all right, and so, then we go separately to the Zoning, and Zoning can be R-1 through R-6, so we have six different residential zonings right now in the Zoning Code. Schmitz stated that’s correct. Frazier stated and some of those fall within two-to-four units per acre, and some of them are higher than two-to-four units per acre. Schmitz stated that’s correct. Frazier said and so, when looking at the Comprehensive Plan vs. th e Zoning map, those two things are different, and the Low Density Residential guid ed use doesn’t necessarily match up with R-1, R-2, it can fall within a couple different Zoning Districts. Schmitz stated that’s correct; those Zoning Districts will have st andards that have to be met as it relates to product type that’s permitted within tho se Zoning Districts. Frazier stated okay. So, the R-4 zone falls in there. Fisher stated understood, I read it wrong. Frazier said okay, so I just wanted to make sure everyone understood Planning Commission Minutes - Regular Meeting January 27, 2025 Page 8 of 14 because there was a comment about the amount of density in this area, and it’s kind of greater than what it is in the surroun ding; but the R-4 is still going to fall within the City’s definition of this is Low Density Residential. Fisher said right; Frazie r said okay. Fisher said sorry, Frazier said no, that’s all right, I just want to make sure we’re all on the same page here. Frazier said so, Crystal, I was going to ask you then if I can go back to, because I was going to have a similar question to Commis - sioner Fisher about where the trail was going to be in relation to the property lines for these homes that are on the south s ide. Because I understand that there’s been no development to the north of these homes since these houses were put in, in 2011, and so, people may not know exactly where their property line is; they may think it goes all the way up to or close to the water edge, but it sounds like that’s not necessarily the case, and it’s between the back property line and the water is about 50 feet. Raleigh replied yes, that’s correct, there is approximately 50 feet, but behind the actual l ot corner to the water edge at the skinniest point, I mean that’s the narrowest area. We found that mowed lawns and maintained lawns are happening past prop - erty lines back there, but the actual property that this Outlot A would be has approximately 50 feet at its narrowest point b e- tween those back corners and the water. Frazier said okay. And this may not be a question for you, it may be a question for one of the planners, but do we have a setback requirement for a trail when it’s butting up to a residential property? I’m sorry, I’m not trying to play stump the planner because I know I’m not supposed to do that. Pierret replied good question, Mr. Chair. We do not have any sort of setback from property lines for a trail of that type. Frazier said all right. Do we know wh at the setback is that this plan is kind of setting to right now, how far away are we from the property line, just kind of an average? Raleigh replied, generally, I would say that it’s 15 feet at the closest from, I’m just judging on some of these schematics that I see in the plan tonight. I don’t have a scale with me to measure it off my plan sheet, but I would say there’s 15 feet where we’re the closest, but again, if we dug into the packet and pulled out a scale, we could get that a little more exact. Frazier said okay, and I’m not looking for you to be exact. My concern is this: These people have come tonight, and they’re concerned about their privacy, you know, in these back yards. And as I said, I don’t think it’s uncommon or it would be unexpected for these people to believe that their property lines maybe went further back than they actually do, and the City’s gone out there and staked them and said here’s where the actual property line is. And, so, we are proposing to build this trail on what will be City property, and so, the City kind of gets to decide what it wants to do with its property, but we want to make sure we’re not bothering the neighboring use. And, so, that’s why I’m just kind of looking at, okay, how far away are we from the property? Is it going to injure their use to it within reason because it is City property that we’re going to put this on, fair? Raleigh replied yes, Mr. Chair, that’s fair. Knable said I have a question, just kind of tapping into what Jessica had talked about, about kind of a compromise. I know th ere’s area there like for boardwalks; would that be something the City and Pulte would be interested in like building a boardwalk through that area so it wouldn’t go like around? Like out there, but just kind of on top of it? Raleigh replied yes, that is something that is being entertained is the potential for boardwalks as sections of this trail; that’s still being talked about with tho se design decisions. Knable asked would it be a conversation to have the whole path like th at? Raleigh replied that it could always be a conversation of that; the costs associated with boardwalks over water like that are typically pretty high in comparison to an asphalt trail, but that’s not to say that it can’t be done. But, yeah, those type of design decisions are still being considered. Knable replied thank you. Bhat asked so the proposed trail is actually extending out of that Outlot A, right , I mean, if you look at the map of the proposed trail. Raleigh asked extending out of what? Bhat replied Outlot A of The Waters at Michael’s Pointe. Raleigh replied that’s correct. Bhat said so that area of the green Outlot A and the property line of the 67th Street Court area, is that City property, or w hat is that? Or is it Dodge Nature Center there? Raleigh replied that area that is proposed as Outlot A is currently owned by the Wolterstorffs, but when it becomes Outlot A, then it would then be owned by the City. Is that what you’re asking? Bhat said m y question is the south of Outlot A and the back of the property line there, the black line there, that small rectangular se ction. Schmitz replied Mr. Chair, Commissioner Bhat, so that sliver of property is already owned by the City ; it was deeded as a part of previous development. Bhat replied thank you. Brittain asked is there any efforts going into, you know, I’m assuming this is the Preliminary Plat, and you talked about boa rdwalks may go here or there, on different parts of the trail, so it’s not a 100% plan that’s finished. But in the event that this goes through here as you’re proposing, is there going to be any mitigation in the landscaping plan for all of this, between the trail and the homes that currently exist there? Raleigh replied Mr. Chair, Commissioner Brittain, their landscaping plan again is something that is still under review and still being considered. I don’t know, and maybe Sam, you know, if the trees are intended on both si des of the trail at this point through that area? Pierret replied not that I can recall; however, like Crystal mentioned, the plan is very much still in flux, as far as landscape, it’s a big thing, and this, of course, does not show it. So, I would just say this l andscaping is something that is very much still under discussions with the City and staff, as fa r as what is going to be done; and that’s also something that could be, of course, subject to change, subject to discussions between staff, the developer, all of that lovely stuff. Planning Commission Minutes - Regular Meeting January 27, 2025 Page 9 of 14 Brittain said I would hope that the homeowners there would be involved in that discussion as well because this is a pretty dr astic change to that area, and you know, the way that it’s been for a long time. I know there’s no guarantees when something’s undeveloped at what’s going to eventually happen there. I know that I don’t recall a plan in the past where they were putting a trail through there, if there were challenges; but every time a new development comes through, the entire plan changes. So, you really can’t look at a plan-by-plan basis and say, yes, that was going to happen or no, that wasn’t. But I would hope that the homeowners would be involved in the placement of that trail, how close it is coming to the property lines, and what type of mitigation that can happen there with respect to landscaping or other aesthetics to help minimize that impact. Frazier asked if there were any other questions for staff. Stephens said I don’t know if it’s a question, per se, but just talking about the mitigation; so, I typically am a proponent of trails and connections and connectivity. However, I would say, so just reviewing all of this and the early, early plans, stormwater, I know nobody here is probably that excited about the stormwater, but this is a really large tributary area to that lake, and e very- body here has mentioned the quality of the lake. And it also was in the report that this development is balancing that water level by half a foot in the lake, and that that needs to be I think brought back down so that it’s not an issue for the residents. I think just in terms of the trail around the lake, it seems like they’re; its maybe kind of like piling, so you’re increasing the water level of the lake, you’re adding in a trail, you’re adding all these homes. I think it would be really nice if instead it was just sort of a consideration that you’re actually enhancing the quality of the lake, keeping that water level as it is ; and if the trails are contrib- uting negatively to that, then maybe that’s something to consider as well , if there is a way around some of these other things that were in the report. That’s all, it’s just not a question, I guess, it’s just my notes for the record. Frazier said all r ight, thank you. Bhat asked so why did the proposal come with the townhomes? Does it make this plan viable only with the townhomes in the plan, in the development? I mean, my question is why not go with all single-family homes, why include townhomes? What sense does it, or what value does it add to that? Pierret replied so, I’ll speak to that, just from kind of the City’s overall house planning. I think Ms. Daily would be willing to come up and provide some statement from a developer side, of course, because we’re kind of two separate entities. From the City’s standpoint, you know, we do, Cottage Grove is looking for needs of diverse housing types, diverse housing of differing costs and affordability; you know, just the single -family homes in every single neighborhood isn’t, you know, well, I could stand up here and talk for hours about the housing needs of the City of Cottage Grove and things like that. So, the townhomes are definitely providing a different type of product for a different homebuyer or someone who is looking for something different than just a traditional single-family home. But I will invite Ms. Daily up as well, to speak to you about things from the other side. Daily said Mr. Chair and Commissioners, yes, as Sam mentioned, we, as Pulte, put in a lot of thought into what could potentia lly work on this site. As has been mentioned, we are following the R-4 Codes, but also there’s a need for this type of housing product. We have a whole market research team that does a lot of analytics to determine what exactly we feel the market could support, and in this particular location, we determined that we feel that townhomes, as well as the single -family product that we have, could meet different buyers at different stages in their lifecycle within Cottage Grove. Bhat said thank you. Frazier asked if there were any further questions for staff or the applicant; none were asked. He asked if there was any further discussion on the proposal; nobody spoke. Frazier said if no one else wants to start, I can start. Okay, so first off, I want to thank everyone for coming ton ight. I know most of you probably haven’t been to one of these meetings before, so you haven’t heard my spiel about how this is the most im - portant form of government because this is the one that’s going to directly impact your lives and you all talked about it. Th is is something that is potentially going to go right in your back yard, these are going to be your new neighbors, and so, you came out tonight to let us know your feelings about that , and I want to thank you for doing that. After tonight, please feel free to come back because every time we have people from the community, who are not involved in these projects , come and give their advice and give their feedback, we find something that all of us have missed, and that’s what makes this process better is if people are willing to come out, help us look at things, and give their advice. So, first off, I want to say t hank you for that. Second, so, I talked a little bit, and a couple of my questions were about where the property line is, whose property is this trail going to go on because that matters, right? If you bought a piece of property, you can’t tell your neighbor what to do with their property, and that ’s kind of part of what’s happening here; the City, under this proposal, is going to own this part of the lake, and so they get to kind of do what they want with their property, within reason. If you wanted to buy that property and do what you wanted to do with it, you have the option to do that, but you can’t tell your neighbor what to do with that. Now, I t hink we’re all cognizant that this is Planning Commission Minutes - Regular Meeting January 27, 2025 Page 10 of 14 the City doing it, and so, we want to make sure that it’s fair to you, but I think the proposals are what we want, just the p rivacy that we bought back in 2011, nobody else gets that, right? Somebody else buys a home in a vacant farm lot, and they don’t bu y all the properties next to them, they can’t control what’s going to happen next to them, and that’s what’s happening here. So , I think we do want to be cognizant of the fact that this is the City that’s going to put in a piece of trail because we should be held to a higher standard than just a normal property owner, but as you heard, the Comprehensive Plan says that’s there a trail th ere; its been planned at least for the past, when did we do the 2040 Plan, it’s five years ago, six years ago, nine years ago, ten years ago? So, at least ten years ago, this trail has been in the guiding document that’s been approved by all of the other surroun ding communities, has been approved by Met Council as this is the pla n, it’s what’s going to happen with the City of Cottage Grove when this property gets developed. And we are bound by the Comprehensive Plan; we can’t deviate from the Comprehensive Plan because it will be a violation of the law to do so. And, so, I think, you know, we have to honor that and what we’ve s aid, this is what’s going to be the plan; but like I said, at the same time, we need to be cognizant of everyone who’s here and saying can we change this, can we alter this, can we make sure it doesn’t have a giant impact on our lives? It’s going to impact you, but let’s try to make it the best as we can. So, I guess that’s where I’m coming from, that’s why I wanted to know how far away we are from the property lines, that we’re making sure we can give people who have their homes there, who haven’t been pla nning on this going in there, so they don’t have people just kind of waltzing through their back yards. I think that’s kind of some of the thoughts that Commissioner Brittain and Commissioner Fisher were bringing up as well is let’s look at the landscaping plan to maybe put, I don't know if you can put a berm in there or put some kind of extra landscaping in there to kind of separate the trail from the back yards. And, so, that’s, I think , kind of where I am landing on this, is I’d like to see more work from the City and I think to the extent that Pulte’s involved in the trail at all, some kind of more work on that kind of front to make this the least disruptive as possible, knowing that we’re required to do this by the Comprehensive Plan. Fisher said first of all, I’d like to apologize for misinterpreting the Zoning Codes, I apologize, I did not mean to be snark y. I agree with you in that this is City-owned property, and the City should be able to do what they want with it; however, this trail does not impact the development of these homes, this trail does not impact the rerouting of Ravine Parkway, this trail does not impact the meat and potatoes of this application. Like, we’re talking about a trail on the very sou thern edge of a big, proud development, and it just is not; to me, it’s not a hill to die on, I think we need to find a compromise because it’s not, it’s just not th e meat of this application. I think there’s been enough concern raised with what you said about the water level coming up because of where the development is and how the Watershed works, and I don’t understand all that because I am a realtor, not an engineer , but there’s real concern there. And just hearing these people say that they experience flooding all the time and that there are big trees back there, it just doesn’t seem like an efficient use of City dollars to make a trail somewhere where there probab ly shouldn’t be one. So, that’s my opinion on it; I think that the development’s great, I mean, I feel like it’s a little more dense than it should be, but that’s just me. I think it’s great to have lifecycle housing, to have multiple options for people. I like t hat all of these people said that they are excited about new neighbors; to me, that says a lot about thei r community and that they’re not against the development, which is really encouraging to me, but this trail is not the hill to die on with this application. Okay, bye. Frazier said thank you. Brittain said yeah, I agree with, I mean to start with the density, if you take a look to the west, you’ve got quad homes, there’s a lot of varying density out to the west of this, and then it leads into the single family, larger lots out to the east. So, yo u know, this is a natural transition, you know, from higher density to a little bit medium to low. So, that particular point of it is I see fitting within the Comprehensive Plan. You know, I know that you mentioned that the trail was in the Comprehensive Plan, and it may have been in the, I totally believe you, that you say that it’s in there; I don’t recall it from previous Comprehensive Plans , and I am concerned, especially with the comments from Commissioner Stephens and her knowledge in the South Wash ington County Watershed, and the neighbors comments on the water levels rising, we would want to make sure that if we did put a trail in he re, that it wasn’t affected by flooding or something that is going to compromise the trail over time because then it’s just a waste of money. So, if we could do our due diligence there as well, I know you guys do a great job of digging into the details, but to make sure that we’re not putting the trail right up next to the property owners’ yards, just to get it away from the pond because we think its going to flood, because you can exit into the neighborhood, go through the street, and back in. There’s already a planned trail excursion to get around those houses, so I really want to see that looked into hard, that this wo uld be a sustainable thing; from the City’s perspective, I’m sure there’s some type of Parks and Rec component here that planning has gone into, whether they feel that we need a trail or something along those lines. So, I don’t think this is, from the City ’s perspective, just based on this development, but from the total perspective of our parks and trail systems, but from the past, I know there was concerns about building something back there; so, we just need to be real careful that if we are going to bui ld something, that it’s some- thing sustainable and it isn’t going to cause problems. And if it does get built, that there should be some mitigation, you k now, aesthetically wise, don’t put it up right next to the property owners’ homes. I know we’ve done it on lots of applications in the Planning Commission Minutes - Regular Meeting January 27, 2025 Page 11 of 14 past where there’s screening, extra screening that’s done in order to mitigate things along those lines so that there’s a bal ance between the overall public at large and the homeowners that are living there, so. Frazier said all right, thank you. Frazier asked if there were any further comments or discussion; there was none. Frazier said seeing none, I guess I’ll look f or someone to make a motion then. Fisher asked how would we make a motion if we want it to be contingent on them figuring out a compromise on the trail? Like, how do we? Frazier replied here’s, I guess, my thought on that is do you want to give, are you asking to give the City and Pulte more time to look at this before we decide on it, or? Fisher said I guess I was going back and referring to the conditions of approval, to see if there’s one in particular we can strike or we can ask for; that’s all, I’m just trying to rediscuss if they can. Can somebody help me like find where that trail is referenced in the conditions, or? Pierret said so, Commissioner Fisher, I do know the trail is referenced under Construction Agreement, it’s Condition #11. Fisher replied okay. Pierret said it says that the Devel - oper shall be responsible for constructing the trail segment around Lake Robert, then continues on regarding the personal pro p- erty encroachments on Outlot A. Fisher said okay, so, I guess I don’t know how to like word it with just striking that; I don 't know, does anybody have, can somebody help me so I don’t look so stupid? Frazier asked so, are you wanting to just get rid of the trail? Fisher replied well, so, there ares pieces of the trail I think that are okay around the north part and around the maybe the east side, and then connecting to the sidewalk that’s there. I mean, I don't know; I guess I don’t know how to word it. I don’t th ink that there should be a trail be tween the homes and the pond, whatever; like I just don’t think it’s efficient. Brittain said in your recommendation, you can recommend changing that particular recommendation with your recommendation. Fisher said right, that’s what I’m trying to do. Brittain said exclude the trail going behind those homes, that is something that you can do , and you are the one making the motion, so you have to say that. Fisher said I understand that, I’m just trying to figure out how that ’s worded appropriately. Brittain said well, you could, as simple as you said, you could say approval subject to the cond itions in the staff report, excluding, with the modification of Item #11, to exclude the trail going behind the homes on the north side of the property. Fisher said okay, what Ken said. Fisher made a motion to approve the application for the Preliminary Plat and the Zoning Amendment, changing it from AG-2 to R-4, which is not R-1, for the proposed Lochridge subdivision, subject to stipulations in the staff report, amending Condition #11 to not allow the trail to run along the north side of the properties on the south side of Lake Robert on 67th Street Bay South and 67th Street Court South. Brittain seconded. Motion failed (3-to-4 vote); no votes from Knable, Frazier, Rasmussen, and Stephens. Frazier asked if there was any further discussion on the motion. Rasmussen stated I guess I just feel that this trail would be pretty beneficial to the community, including myself. I don’t l ive in the area, but I’d love to take advantage of a trail around a nice lake, maybe not so nice through the woods, ride my bike on it. You know, if the trail is possible to be constructed there and it’s not interfering with the water or the property lines, I just feel it would be a shame to bring it two-thirds of the way around the lake and then maybe just dead end it there or rerout ing people now in front of your houses. Is that a better scenario to come take the sidewalk in front of the house, maybe, but I just think if it’s possible and it makes sense and it can be done, I feel it would be a nice amenity for everybody in town , is my thought. Stephens said I would just say that I agree; I think the trail’s a great amenity, and this is an opportunity for the City to install the trail without, right, because the developer installs it, correct? I think that if it goes, I mean, it seems like a real ly good opportunity to just go in front of the homes and then connect back with the lake, but I do think that anybody who likes to go for a walk or a jog, you want a loop; you don’t want to go halfway and then turn around and then go halfway again and keep bouncing back and forth until you hit your like 5K, right? So, I’m in favor of the connection, just not, to me, it’s not like; I don't know, I don’t think it should be removed, I think it should be a full connected loop, so that’s just my two cents, I gue ss. Knable said so, if we’re doing that path, I think it needs to be a full path as well. I don’t think you can just have it stop and go a different direction. I would just say, you know, with the City owning it, I think everything you said, but they will do a bet ter job of working with, I think, the residents on what it looks like, s o. Bhat said yeah, I just think maybe we should explore the option of having a boardwalk or something along those lines, so that you can have a complete path; instead of being on an area that is going to be flood prone, maybe we should explore a boardwalk or something along those lines. Planning Commission Minutes - Regular Meeting January 27, 2025 Page 12 of 14 Stephens asked could we consider like modifying the motion so that it doesn’t just cut out that piece, but i t’s just looking at alternatives? Frazier replied so, you can move amend her motion, and she can decide if she wants to agree to it or not. Fisher said I appreciate the thought of having a loop, not being a runner myself, I wouldn’t care if it wasn’t a loop. I mean , there are lots of places that, you know, you have a trail. I think of one of my favorite spots in Hamlet Park that goes and there’s a beautiful bench and it’s a dead end; and you sit at that beautiful bench and I have one of my favorite pictures of my kids si tting on that bench, you know what I mean? Like, I think that there ’s opportunity to use this space without it going in between those houses right there. I don't know, I don’t, if you guys want to do the loop, like fine, I’ll amend the motion, then it needs t o go in front of those houses, but I don’t think; I mean, to me, it doesn’t matter that much. Frazier said and this is the point I was going to want to clarify anyway, because my understanding of your motion was just that the trail wasn’t going to go behind the hous es. Fisher said right. Frazier said so, technically, that motion means the City could still build it up to the ex isting sidewalk and around; that’s not precluded by your motion, your motion was just that the trail would not go in the back yards of these houses. Fish er replied correct. Frazier said so, that is the motion right now is that basically the City and the developer are not going to build the trail on the north edge of the property line of these 67th Street Bay South properties. So, they have other opportunities that are not precluded by Commissioner Fisher’s motion, at least from my understanding. Fisher repl ied right, no. Frazier said it’s just that they would not go to the north side of those properties. Is everyone clear on that? Fisher replied correct, yes. Frazier asked Stephens does that solve your concern, or do you still want to make an amendment? Step hens replied I think I’m good. Frazier said okay. Any further discussion on the motion now that we had that clarification? There was none. Thank you for all of you for bearing with us while we do math at the table here. Fisher said sorry, I just didn’t want to get it wrong. Frazier sa id okay; any further discussion on the motion? Seeing none, I will call for a vote on the motion. After the vote, Frazier said that proposal fails; at this time, is there any further discussion? Otherwise, I’ll look for another motion. Bhat asked can we go with this motion, but the modification for Item #11 would be that the City would take a fresh look at it, and then come to a compromised solution, which would perhaps retain the trail but it won’t be right behind the property line of the 67th Street Bay South. Frazier said okay, so I guess I’d be looking for kind of some more definite language then, because , ideally, what’s going to happen is this language is going to go to City Council; they would take our recommendation and then City staff and the developer would have to put it into practice, and s o, we have to have some definite language as to what we want this to look like, I guess. If your request is we just want you to go back to the drawing board, then I think that’s a differ ent discussion we can have; I don't know that staff loves that idea, b ut Emily, do you want to chime in? Schmitz replied Mr. Chair, Members of the Commission, I was just going to reference there’s been some conversation about a boardwalk, and so we are entertaining boardwalk options in several segments of the trail to avoid impact where we can for tha t paved trail. I think it’s very important to reference, you know, cost; I think there was one idea about is that whole souther ly section a boardwalk that pushes the trail into the water. I would just caution on the cost associated with that type of trail as an option. Frazier asked is there any further discussion? Knable said I just don’t like the language of being stricken out completely; F razier said okay. Fisher said it wasn’t stricken out completely. Knable said well, I think the ask was that we, the City, doesn’t do the trail at all, or they do the connections in the front and take out that part, but I think that part needs to stay in. Frazier said so you’d like to see it pass just as recommended, then? Knable replied as is and see the City stand up and do what they think is right with that piece. Frazier asked so, is that a motion, then, or are you just discussing? Knable made a motion to approve the Zoning Amendment to change AG -2 to R-4 and the Preliminary Plat, subject to stipula- tions in the staff report as written. Rasmussen seconded. Motion passed (4-to-3 vote); no votes from Bhat, Brittain, and Fisher. 7. APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF DECEMBER 16, 2024 Fisher made a motion to approve the minutes of the December 16, 2024, Planning Commission meeting. Stephens seconded. Motion passed unanimously (7-to-0 vote). 8. REPORTS Planning Commission Minutes - Regular Meeting January 27, 2025 Page 13 of 14 A. RECAP OF JANUARY CITY COUNCIL MEETING Schmitz summarized the actions taken at the January 8 and January 22, 2025, City Council meetings. Council Member Olsen said first of all, I’m very grateful to be here with you all tonight; as you know, each year when the Ci ty Council is readjourned in January, the mayor makes recommendations on various liaisons for various commissions. This year, one of his recommendations was to have me work with the Planning Commission, and I haven’t had that opportunity in a few years so I’m very excited for that. Thanks for having me. I also want to thank you all for your service. I know that for at l east one, maybe, we’re getting to the end of the term, is that right? So, who are we losing, anyone? Or a re you all good until next year? Rasmussen indicated he was at the end of his term. Olsen stated so February is when terms kind of start and expire; so, there’ll be a little bit of turnover on all of the various City commissions. If you have a desire to continue serving, and you’ve term ed out, I think Ken’s been through this about 12 times, something like that. If you term out, you wait for a year and then you can reapply for any commission, including the one that you currently serve on. So, please give that some thought because as a Council, we put a lot of faith in what you bring to us as advice on all of the various issues that you deal with, including challenging i ssues like the one you had to deal with this evening. Olsen reported that the City Council held our annual Strategic Planning session; for those of you who don’t know what that is, each year in January, the City Council and staff get together for a full day on Saturday, it’s usually about 7:30 a.m. to 5:0 0 p.m., give or take, where we look at our strategic objectives for the past and decide if we want to carry those forward into current time and then into the future. We also look back at what have we accomplished tactically with respect to those objectives, an d what do we want to do next, and how do we want to approach that? So, it’s a really heavy mental-lifting day, but it’s a fun day, it’s a really good day to kind of dream a little bit, get some ideas out there, and I think you’ll find that we have some rea lly neat things on tap this year that we are going to be working towards. Of course, we’re all very excited about access to the Mississippi River, down at the new park, that’ll be something fun that we’ll be working on. We’ve got the Kingston Park building and the electrical getting upgraded in the next couple of years, electrical this year, building next year. We also have all of our new Water Treatment Plants coming online, so the Low Zone plant is about done, and the High Zone plant will get started here this year. There are some things going on with Holcim that I’m sure you all know about and their desire to maybe expand their operation and do some things differently, so, we’ll have to give that consideration. So, it’s going to be a busy year, it always seems to go by so stinking fast, and of course, it all comes down to the budget; and it seems like we never stop talking about the budget. We do budget every two years, but even at the Strategic Planning session, everything has to tie back to is it in our Capital Improv ement Plan? Is it something that we’ve been saving for, do we have funding, what kind of third -party funding can we find, etc. One of the things I like to do as the liaison to whatever commission I’m working with is I like to be very transparent. I lik e to open up the floor for you to ask any questions you may have about anything that’s going on in the City, and provided I’m not l imited by an NDA or something like that, I’m always happy to share and try to answer questions to the best of my ability. Keep in mi nd I’m a Council Member, there’s five of us, and you know, we act as a body; so, if there’s something that you ask me and it ’s an opinion, I’ll tell you it’s an opinion because I can’t speak for the body, but you know, I’m definitely very grateful to have been reelected this last year. I look forward to four more years of serving the citizens of Cottage Grove to the very best o f my ability. With that, I’ll turn it back to you if you have any questions for me. Frazier said all right, thank you. Any questions for Council Member Olsen? Frazier said I don’t see any, thank you very much for being here. Council Member Olsen replied thank you, and I’m always available. Please feel free to reach out any time. B. RESPONSE TO PLANNING COMMISSION INQUIRIES None. C. PLANNING COMMISSION REQUESTS Frazier asked if there were any requests for staff for our next meeting. Bhat said so, during the discussions today, we have had several questions on the Jamaica renewal and improvement going from one lane to two lanes on either side. Can we get some more information on that? Is that something that was discussed in some Planning Commission Minutes - Regular Meeting January 27, 2025 Page 14 of 14 of those meetings or with the Council? Schmitz replied , Mr. Chair, Commissioner Bhat, we can follow up with some more details of the County’s plan for 2028 and where they’re at in their planning process. Bhat replied thank you. Brittain said in regards to that, is Jamaica going to be a City road? Are they turning that over to us? I heard some rumbling s. Olsen replied yes, the expectation is that once that road is fully reconstructed, the City will take ownership. Brittain said, s o, it’s just a matter of time; Olsen replied theoretically, yes. Frazier said before I ask for a motion to adjourn, I do just want to thank everyone, staff and our commission tonight; I know these meetings are not easy, and I think this is probably one of the only meetings in a while, especially where we’ve had not unan imous decisions on a motion. So, I want to thank everyone for being cordial about it and being intentional about their discussion o n it. Like I told everyone who was here tonight, it makes the decision better in the end if we all can have an honest opinion and respect what we’re all saying. So, I want to thank everyone’s who left in the room here tonight for working on this project, and hope fully, it will go very smoothly and everyone will be happy with it. With that being said, Item 9 is adjournment, so I’ll look for a motion to adjourn. 9. ADJOURNMENT Rasmussen made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Knable seconded. Motion passed unanimously (7-to-0 vote). The meeting was adjourned at 8:40 p.m. 1 City Council Action Request 7.E. Meeting Date 3/5/2025 Department Community Development Agenda Category Action Item Title Rental License Approvals Staff Recommendation Approve the issuance of rental licenses to the properties in the attached table. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. Rental License Approvals CC Memo 2. Rental License Approvals Table TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator FROM: Samantha Drewry, Code Enforcement Officer DATE: February 27, 2025 RE: Rental License Approvals Background/Discussion Rental licenses are required for nonowner-occupied residential properties (City Code Title 9-13, Property Maintenance, and Title 9 -14, Rental Licensing) and are issued on a biennial basis. The licensing process includes submittal of the rental license application, payment of $180, and public criminal history report. Rental inspections are conducted on all rental properties as part of the licensing process. Once all information has been sub - mitted and the inspection satisfactorily completed, the Council must approve the license prior to it being issued. The properties listed in the attached table have completed the licensing process and are ready to have their licenses issued following Council approval. Recommendation Approve the issuance of rental licenses to the properties in the attached table. 2025 RENTAL LICENSES CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL - MARCH 5, 2025 RENTAL LICENSE NUMBER PROPERTY STREET #PROPERTY STREET NAME PROPERTY OWNER RENT-001433-8800 Ironwood Avenue South Kolleen Gygi RENT-001461-8005 Harkness Road South MJEM, LLC RENT-001462-8423 Henna Avenue South Mark Mason, MJEM LLC RENT-001525-9177 Jarvis Avenue South Eric & Carrie Pettey RENT-001527-9024 Jensen Avenue South Mike Rygh RENT-001541-8159 Henslowe Avenue South Tavifa & Joshua Wahlin RENT-001610-8809 Ironwood Avenue South Martin Greis RENT-001614-7782 79th Street South Eunsil & Hyun Lee RENT-001630-8794 Ironwood Avenue South Mark & Melinda Cathey RENT-001639-8988 92nd Street South Nikki Beaumia, Executive Realty RENT-001651-6536 Genevieve Trail South Moeed Asghar RENT-001662-8555 Imperial Avenue South Washington County CDA RENT-001664-8534 Imperial Avenue South Washington County CDA RENT-001665-8923 Greystone Avenue South Washington County CDA RENT-001678-10276 East Point Douglas Road South, Unit B Michael & Paula Bushilla RENT-001679-10276 East Point Douglas Road South, Unit C Michael & Paula Bushilla RENT-001685-6472 Genevieve Trail South Rezvan Tebyanifard RENT-001686-6796 Pine Crest Trail South Elysia McDunn, E.A. Investments Inc. RENT-001704 9675 84th Street South Preston Hayward RENT-001705-7901 Hemingway Avenue South Naveen Sahni RENT-001706-7313 Timber Crest Drive South Jake Becker RENT-001739-8429 66th Street South Chy Ways/Nancy Yang, Kayo Investment LLC RENT-002584 8855 Ironwood Avenue South Pamela Brown RENT-002588 7008 Homestead Avenue South Washington County CDA RENT-002607 7130 71st Street South Traci Parzych RENT-002622 7654 East Point Douglas Road South HJW Holdings LLC RENT-002623 7658 East Point Douglas Road South HJW Holdings LLC RENT-002624 6781 Pine Crest Trail South Mary Bakewell RENT-002700 6903 99th Street South Damian Jelich RENT-002703 6299 63rd Street South Michael Dendinger MULTI-FAMILY: Cottage Grove Estates (Oakwood Heights): 7565 79th Street; 6 buildings, 24 units 1 City Council Action Request 7.F. Meeting Date 3/5/2025 Department Administration Agenda Category Action Item Title Convention and Visitors Bureau Appointment - Haatvedt Staff Recommendation Approve Michael Haatvedt to serve on the Convention and Visitors Bureau for a term ending on December 31, 2028. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. Memo - CVB Member Appointment_Haatvedt TO:City Council FROM:Justin Olsen, CGCVB Chairman of the Board DATE:February 19, 2025 RE:Convention and Visitors Bureau Member Appointment Background/Discussion The City received a commission application from Michael Haatvedt and I subsequently interviewed him for a vacant position on the CVB Board. Mr. Haatvedt’s experience in the hospitality industry provides him with valuable insights into the needs and concerns of this vital sector of our community. Furthermore, his experience as a business owner demonstrates his understanding of the challenges and opportunities facing local businesses. Mr. Haatvedt is well-qualified, and I am confident he will demonstrate himself as an asset to our community. I am pleased to recommend him to fill the vacant seat on the CVB with a term ending December 31, 2028. Recommendation Appoint Michael Haatvedt to fill the vacant seat on the Convention and Visitors Bureau Board of Directors. 1 City Council Action Request 7.G. Meeting Date 3/5/2025 Department Communications Agenda Category Action Item Title Convention and Visitors Bureau 2025 Strategic Plan Staff Recommendation Receive final 2025 CVB Strategic Plan. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. CVB Final Strategic Plan Memo 3-5-25 2. FINAL Cottage Grove CVB 2025 Strategic Plan TO:Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator FROM:Gretchen Larson, Economic Development Director Phil Jents, Communications Manager and CVB Staff Liaison DATE:March 5, 2025 RE:Chandlerthinks Final CVB Strategic Plan Background In June of 2024, Chandlerthinks was selected to create a strategic plan for the Convention and Visitors Bureau (CVB). In addition to being the best fit to create the plan for the CVB, Chandlerthinks’ proposal was also the lowest priced proposal submitted at $35,750 with $1,500 earmarked for post project consulting services upon finalization of the plan. As a part of their research and planning, the team at Chandlerthinks conducted a site visit to the city on October 7 and 8, 2024. The City arranged in-person meetings with: •The City Council •EDA members •CVB members •River Oaks Golf Course and Event Center •Parks and Recreation •Area hoteliers •Tourism-related businesses, event managers, and others The team at Chandlerthinks also conducted virtual interviews for those who were not be able to attend an in-person meeting. They concluded their interviews with a virtual meeting on November 10, 2024 with the members of the Cottage Grove Athletic Association. On November 26, 2024, City staff presented an update to the CVB board on the strategic planning process, and provided early feedback being considered for the City’s tourism strategies. On January 9, 2025, a strength, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis and goal setting session was held with Mayor Bailey, members of the CVB and EDA boards, the City Administrator, and city staff. After the meeting, all notes made by participants were submitted to Chandlerthinks for incorporation into the final plan. Steve Chandler (Owner / Brand Strategist, Chandlerthinks) presented to a joint meeting of the EDA and CVB on Tuesday, February 11, 2025 an overview of the final plan. Upon conclusion of the meeting, final feedback was provided to Chandlerthinks for inclusion / consideration for the final strategic plan. Recommendation Receive final 2025 CVB Strategic Plan. Cottage Grove STRATEGIC PLAN FEBRUARY 2025 2 Section DISCOVER COTTAGE GROVE 2 SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS In December of 2019, the City of Cottage Grove established a Convention and Visitors Bureau (CVB). The CVB is also known as Discover Cottage Grove (DCG). Discover Cottage Grove though still in its early stages, is focused on laying a strong foundation for its future growth. The funding for the CVB is through a 3% transient guest tax which generates roughly $90,000 annually. The CVB hired Chandlerthinks for the development of a Strategic Plan. The purpose of The Strategic Plan is to provide a road map to maintain and enhance CVB’s competitive positioning relative to their competitive destination markets and identify growth markets while anticipating the future state of tourist needs and possible infrastructure upgrades that may be needed. The current and future needs of group meetings, and sports are also a priority. DISCOVER COTTAGE GROVE PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 1. Ensure that funding and program development are aligned among CVB, its partners, government entities, non-profits and that the plan meets the long-term goals of the community. 2. Recommend actions to increase visitor flow across all segments (leisure, meetings, sports, etc.). 3. Conduct a SWOT analysis of the effectiveness of CVB’s marketing programs and recommendations to improve these initiatives. COTTAGE GROVE TOURISM GOALS The goals for this tourism strategic plan are: 1. Become the authoritative voice for managing, promoting, and growing tourism for Cottage Grove. 2. Increase funding for tourism in Cottage Grove, MN. 3. Increase sales tax revenue by 3% over the next 3 years. 4. Increase visitor spending by 3% in three years as reported by the state. Strategic Plan DISCOVER COTTAGE GROVE SWOT ANALYSIS STRENGTHS • Access to the Mississippi River – Cottage Grove benefits from its proximity to the Mississippi River, offering potential for tourism development. • Well-Maintained and Beautiful City – The city is recognized for its clean, attractive, and well-maintained environment. • Wedding Venue Appeal – Cottage Grove offers beautiful wedding venues. • Sports Tournaments – The city hosts several sports tournaments, such as softball, soccer, and hockey. • Positive attitude towards tourism’s future. • Events – Some events, particularly Strawberry Festival, create strong attendance. WEAKNESSES • Limited Lodging – The lack of hotels in Cottage Grove results in tourism revenue flowing to nearby communities like Woodbury and Hastings. Wedding venues and local businesses all indicate their “guests” stay at hotels in other communities. • Absence of a Tourism Culture – Cottage Grove lacks a strong culture or infrastructure to support and promote tourism. • No Major Attraction or Driver – The city has limited assets that serve as significant destination draws for visitors. • No Central Gathering Space – Cottage Grove does not have a defined “town center,” downtown, or main street to serve as a hub for community activities. • Location Challenge – The city is not located along a primary travel corridor, which may limit its ability to attract visitors seeking convenient overnight stops. • Lacking Focus – Tourism website and social media lack focus and are distracting with content unrelated to tourism. • Low Awareness – Low search inquiry volume and TripAdvisor results indicate Cottage Grove is very low on awareness as a destination. 3 Strategic Plan DISCOVER COTTAGE GROVE OPPORTUNITIES • Additional Lodging – Adding more lodging seems to be a strong possibility. In fact, search inquiry volume shows people are actively searching for Cottage Grove hotels (and hotels near Woodbury and Hastings) each month. There is enough in the region to fill more overnight stays. Half of all visitors to Cottage Grove are staying in the Country Inn & Suites. • Packaging Assets – Although lacking an attractor, Cottage Grove has the ability to assemble like assets for packaged experiences near Minneapolis. • Weddings – Minneapolis wedding venues are a very active search inquiry. • Old Cottage Grove – Develop Old Cottage Grove as a tourism destination. THREATS • Current lodging shortfalls help tourism for other communities, making Cottage Grove events great marketing for others more than local. • Woodbury is developing a strong destination marketing plan. 4 Strategic Plan DISCOVER COTTAGE GROVE 5 Strategic Plan AUDIENCES In developing the Cottage Grove Tourism Strategic Plan, it’s essential to recognize that successful tourism efforts extend beyond attracting visitors. A thriving tourism strategy supports the community and aligns with the interests of a diverse range of stakeholders. For this reason, our targeted audiences include both local and visitor groups. Local Audiences play a critical role in creating and sustaining an appealing tourism environment. Their engagement and support help ensure long-term success, making it vital to collaborate with: 1. Local Tourism Stakeholders: These individuals and organizations directly influence the visitor experience and help shape the community’s tourism identity. 2. Elected Leadership: Gaining the support and involvement of local government officials ensures alignment with broader economic and community goals. 3. Residents: Empowering and involving residents fosters community pride, increases buy-in, and amplifies positive word-of-mouth. 4. Existing Business Owners: Supporting and collaborating with local businesses ensures that tourism growth benefits the local economy. 5. Industry Peers: Sharing ideas and collaborating with regional and state tourism organizations helps Cottage Grove stay competitive and innovative. Visitor Audiences remain a primary focus of tourism efforts, as they bring new economic opportunities and vitality to Cottage Grove. By understanding and catering to distinct visitor segments, we aim to enhance their experience and attract a diverse range of travelers: 1. Corporate Travelers: Offering tailored services and amenities for business professionals can position Cottage Grove as an attractive destination for corporate meetings and events. 2. Sports Teams: With strong regional interest in youth and adult sports, catering to sports teams and their families provides a key opportunity to drive visitation. 3. Weddings: Highlighting Cottage Grove’s scenic and event-friendly venues positions the community as an ideal location for destination weddings. 4. Surrounding Communities: Promoting nearby getaways and day trips encourages repeat visits and fosters strong connections with neighboring areas. By addressing the needs and interests of both local and visitor audiences, the Cottage Grove Tourism Strategic Plan seeks to balance growth with community values and build a sustainable foundation for the future. DISCOVER COTTAGE GROVE 6 Strategic Plan RECOMMENDATIONS Cottage Grove’s tourism sector, though still in its early stages, has made impressive strides with the resources available. Despite challenges like limited lodging and destination assets, your team has successfully leveraged existing strengths. This strategic plan provides recommendations for enhancing, expanding, and developing new assets to foster tourism growth over the next three to five years. There is a foundational philosophy to keep in mind when managing tourism. We encourage you to embrace this as you move forward. It is – For tourism to be real, it must be real. • It must have someone to own it. • It must have the organizational structure to be accountable and provide direction. • It must have a revenue source and funding. KEY INITIATIVES Outlined below are the key initiatives for Cottage Grove to help grow tourism over the next three years. 1 Develop a Culture of Tourism 2 Partnering & Packaging with Existing Assets 3 Facilitate Product Development (Long-Term) 4 On-Going Marketing 5 Tracking & Reporting 7 Strategic Plan DISCOVER COTTAGE GROVE 8 Key Initiative I KEY INITIATIVE 1 – DEVELOP A CULTURE OF TOURISM Yes, this is a higher priority than any other. It’s the priority over developing another hotel. It’s a priority over spending dollars on marketing. Creating a culture of tourism must happen in order for it to develop into a real economic driver for Cottage Grove. WHAT IS A CULTURE OF TOURISM? It means….. It’s viewed as economic development. It’s viewed as a viable new business opportunity. Businesses expect new faces and are willing to help. Businesses are connected to one another and need a unified understanding of what tourism creates. STAFFING To successfully grow tourism, you need to have someone own the responsibility. While the city does not have dedicated resources, it does have staffing resources focused on the efforts to drive tourism. A person dedicated to tourism may be the single biggest priority that can make an impact at creating the foundation needed ahead. The focus of a Tourism Director (Manager/ Coordinator) is to grow tourism and create/maintain a Cottage Grove tourism culture. This individual will manage the resources as well as build partnerships, help to establish packages and programs as well as create and manage the marketing communications. ESTABLISH THE STRUCTURE FOR TOURISM With accountability to leadership AND tourism professionals, Tourism board steering is crucial. When stakeholders are a part of creating the direction, they will also make sure their business aligns. Tourism management, for now, should continue as a department of the City. At some point it may be necessary to create a separate tourism department or consider branding it out as a 501C6 . As Tourism grows, a dedicated Tourism Director, Manager or Coordinator will be necessary. DEVELOP A CULTURE OF TOURISM DISCOVER COTTAGE GROVE 9 CHANGE THE NAME Since you are not involved in “conventions”, we recommend changing the name of the organization to Cottage Grove Tourism or Cottage Grove Tourism & Sports. Adding MN (discovercottagegrovemn.com) might be advantageous for search engine results. EDUCATE AND EVANGELIZE YOUR TOURISM BOARD The Cottage Grove Tourism Board should represent tourism in some form and should be educated on tourism today. As the guiding governors of tourism direction for the staff, they need to be aware of the latest trends and local-regional tourism data. The Tourism Director (or whatever the title is given to the staff leading the charge) should always provide some level of ongoing education to the board. Use industry research and news as well as resources available through Minneapolis and St. Paul tourism organizations. Also, use the newly formed Mission-Vision-Values as guiding lights for tourism, including how the board works with others and one another. ESTABLISH YOUR MISSION/VISION/VALUES We started the process, but it is important to establish your mission, vision and values to help others understand your purpose and role in tourism in Cottage Grove. Proposed Mission Statement Stimulate the Cottage Grove economy for residents and businesses through thoughtful promotion, coordination and preservation of tourism. Proposed Vision Statement To be seen as a desired community to visit, an economic catalyst into the local economy and a trusted community partner. Proposed Values Passion – We show enthusiasm for our industry and the ambition to make it better. Expertise – We are committed to educating ourselves on the ever-changing dynamics affecting our industry and serving as a resource to our stakeholders. Resiliency – We are committed to being optimistic in accomplishing our mission, regardless of setbacks. Collaborative – We acknowledge success happens only when we all work together. Authentic – We will always support efforts to promote, create and preserve genuine experiences reflective of our destination. Hospitality – We are role models for our industry in the friendly and generous reception of all. Pride – We are proud of our community and support wherever possible. Key Initiative I DEVELOP A CULTURE OF TOURISM DISCOVER COTTAGE GROVE 10 DEFINE TOURISM Create an agreed-upon definition of tourism so everyone knows our purpose and focus. We have recommended one for you to work from below. Definition of Tourism – Tourism is the new tax revenue and direct spending generated by those not living in Cottage Grove (ideally more than 50 miles away). This includes overnight stays and day trippers. This includes recreational, leisure or business purposes. DEFINE TOURISM. For now Cottage Grove Tourism marketing efforts will be regional and will include the Twin Cities area. DEFINE COTTAGE GROVE TOURISM’S ROLE The typical role of a tourism agency is: • Destination Marketing: Be the voice for why visitors (leisure, business and groups) should come to a destination. • Destination Leadership: Bring partners and stakeholders together under a shared vision and destination strategy. • In-Destination Management: Influence how visitors experience the destination and support sustainable development. To foster a thriving tourism community and cultivate trust for Cottage Grove Tourism, we propose the following strategic actions aimed at engaging and educating key stakeholders. These initiatives will equip our partners to serve as informed ambassadors, enhancing our collective efforts to promote Cottage Grove as a place to visit. Key Initiative I DEVELOP A CULTURE OF TOURISM DISCOVER COTTAGE GROVE 11 HOST AN INTRODUCTORY STAKEHOLDER SUMMIT Kick-off with a comprehensive meeting for the tourism community, including the Cottage Grove Tourism Board, to clearly communicate the value and impact of tourism on your local economy. Present your mission, vision, and values, alongside an in-depth look at the roles and responsibilities of Cottage Grove Tourism. This forum is essential for establishing tourism as a vital contributor to your community’s success while sharing your strategic plans for the future. ONGOING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Encourage continuous learning by requiring your Tourism Director and each Tourism Board member to attend at least one tourism-related educational event or class annually. This commitment to development ensures that board members remain informed about industry trends and can better advocate for tourism initiatives. Meet Minneapolis hosts a Tourism Academy in June: https://www.tourismacademy.com/. The Explore Minnesota Tourism Conference is the annual learning opportunity designed specifically for the Minnesota tourism industry. This educational event includes national keynote speakers, topical breakout sessions, networking and plenty of fresh and actionable ideas. This occurs in February: https://mn.gov/tourism-industry/industry-opportunities/learn-with-us/tourism-conference.jsp REGULAR STAKEHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS Launch a quarterly stakeholder newsletter with the goal of transitioning to a monthly format. This communication should celebrate the successes of tourism efforts in Cottage Grove, highlight upcoming events, and provide insights into current projects and initiatives. It serves as a valuable tool to keep stakeholders engaged, informed, and inspired. While the Annual Report is nice, we also recommend on a quarterly basis, presenting a short top-line overview from Cottage Grove Tourism – report the numbers, any significant milestones or accomplishments, and upcoming opportunities. Key Initiative I DEVELOP A CULTURE OF TOURISM DISCOVER COTTAGE GROVE 12 BE THE REGIONAL TOURISM HUB Position Discover Cottage Grove as a central connector for tourism in the region. Develop strong partnerships with neighboring communities through regular collaboration, such as a quarterly breakfast hosted by Discover Cottage Grove. Explore joint marketing campaigns and multi- county travel packages that highlight the unique experiences our region offers, creating win-win opportunities for all involved. These initiatives will not only strengthen relationships between Discover Cottage Grove and its stakeholders but will also lay the foundation for a collaborative and thriving tourism environment. By educating and empowering your community, you’ll cultivate a network of ambassadors who are passionate about promoting Cottage Grove. VISITORS GUIDES The primary goal of the Visitors Guide is to inspire travel by offering curated recommendations for accommodations, activities, and dining unique to Cottage Grove, highlighting its premier wedding venues, sporting facilities, and scenic parks. While the previous guide included additional content such as recipes and book recommendations, we believe these elements can be trimmed to enhance focus on travel-related experiences. We suggest a more concise format, with a streamlined page count, and propose adding a dedicated section for Paddle Sports—including golf, disc golf, paddle boats, and pickleball—to further appeal to recreational enthusiasts. In addition to the Visitors Guide, we recommend the development of a standalone Wedding Guide that showcases Cottage Grove’s wedding venues, as well as local businesses like Bride & Jewel, lodging options, and essential services such as photography and catering. COTTAGE GROVE BIKE PARK© ISAAC PAVEKDISCOVERCOTTAGEGROVE.COM Cottage Grove DISCOVER OUR HIDDEN TREASURES | 2025 VISITOR GUIDE TWIN CITIES MINNESOTA Try a newadventure! Key Initiative I DEVELOP A CULTURE OF TOURISM DISCOVER COTTAGE GROVE 13 A WEBSITE BUILT FOR TOURISM The website should have some similar connections to the Visitors Guide (of course it has more fun content). We recommend making updates following the template of the guide. In addition, there should be a section dedicated to Wedding Venues which should include information on Explore Cottage Grove’s website before linking to the venue or other websites. Also make sure you include reference to Weddings in Twin Cities, St. Paul, Minneapolis. All of this helps with Search Engine Optimization. Additional enhancements include: • Make the button to request a visitor’s guide as part of your global navigation to it is on all the pages of the website. • Add more photography and information about prime events in Cottage Grove such as Hometown Holiday, Food Truck Festival, One Family Fest. • Create itineraries on the website for inspiring trips to Cottage Grove. Reference other tourism sites for how to build strong itineraries. • Add a Search feature. • Update Furber Farms to The Madison - https://discovercottagegrove.com/2024/02/ elementor-7448/ LOOK TO INCREASE FUNDING Currently, Cottage Grove’s tourism funding is generated through a 3% lodging tax on hotels and short-term rentals which brings in approximately $90,000 annually. The annual budget needs to be $150K - $300K for marketing tourism. Cottage Grove Tourism can further strengthen its financial resources by applying for state tourism grants. Below are potential grant programs available through the Minnesota Division of Tourism: https://mn.gov/tourism-industry/industry-opportunities/grant-programs/ To adequately support the growth of Cottage Grove tourism, it is essential to create a competitive and sustainable funding model that covers staffing, travel, and marketing needs. The easiest way to increase tourism funding, of course, is the addition of available lodging rooms, room nights and rates. Key Initiative I DEVELOP A CULTURE OF TOURISM DISCOVER COTTAGE GROVE 14 KEY INITIATIVE 2 PARTNERING & PACKAGING WITH EXISTING ASSETS The goal is to package and promote existing assets to create attractive short-term products that will draw in visitors. These recommendations focus on making the most of existing assets while partnering with local businesses and nearby communities to grow Cottage Grove’s tourism industry. By packaging these experiences into marketable products, Cottage Grove can attract more visitors and increase tourism revenue. CONNECT WITH TOURISM STAKEHOLDERS ON WHAT THEY WOULD LIKE The best ideas for connecting partners do not come from the consultant. They come from the partners. Bring them together for the purpose of developing ideas on how the community can work together to create tourism programs and events. HIGHLIGHTING FAMILY AND FRIENDS GATHERINGS Many visitors come to Cottage Grove to reconnect with loved ones. However, our research shows that residents often take their guests to destinations outside of Cottage Grove. To encourage locals to explore and enjoy what the area has to offer, we propose creating a brochure featuring the top five must-do activities in Cottage Grove. This will serve as a guide for residents, helping them discover great spots to take their family and friends right within their own community. WEDDING FAIR EVENT Host an annual Wedding Fair designed to showcase Cottage Grove as a premier wedding destination, featuring its beautiful venues and a variety of local vendors. The fair would highlight Cottage Grove’s unique wedding venues, provide prospective brides and grooms with the opportunity to explore the spaces and envision their special day in this picturesque setting. The event can also include booths from local dress shops, florists, photographers, caterers, makeup artists, and entertainment services, creating a one-stop experience for couples planning their weddings. By collaborating with vendors from the area, the fair will not only boost awareness of local businesses but also establish Cottage Grove as a key destination for weddings, both for locals and visitors alike. Key Initiative II PARTNERING & PACKAGING WITH EXISTING ASSETS DISCOVER COTTAGE GROVE 15 Additional elements of the Wedding Fair could include: • Live Fashion Shows featuring local bridal boutiques and formalwear shops. • Venue Tours allowing potential clients to explore the diverse offerings. • Vendor Demonstrations showcasing florists’ arrangements, photography styles, and even cake tastings from local bakeries. • Workshops and Panels where couples can learn from local wedding planners, designers, and industry professionals about current trends and tips for organizing their dream wedding. • Exclusive Discounts for services booked during the event, encouraging on-the-spot decisions and collaboration with local businesses. By integrating a wide variety of wedding-related services, this event can become a signature annual affair, drawing in not just local residents but also couples from neighboring areas seeking the charm and hospitality Cottage Grove offers. STRAWBERRY FESTIVAL – “BRING A FRIEND” INITIATIVE The Annual Strawberry Festival is a beloved event in Cottage Grove, celebrating the community’s rich agricultural heritage and small-town charm. To make this festival even more impactful, we suggest launching a “Bring a Friend” initiative, encouraging locals to invite friends and family from outside the area to experience the festival and discover the charm of Cottage Grove firsthand. Key Initiative II PARTNERING & PACKAGING WITH EXISTING ASSETS DISCOVER COTTAGE GROVE 16 This initiative can foster a sense of community pride while also introducing visitors to the city’s unique attractions and local businesses, driving tourism and economic growth. Here’s how it can be expanded: Key Features of the “Bring a Friend” Initiative: • Special Incentives for Locals and Their Guests: Offer exclusive perks, such as discounted or free admission for guests who are invited by a local. This could also include “two-for-one” deals on festival tickets, food, and merchandise. • “Ambassador for a Day” Program: Locals who bring a friend can be designated as festival ambassadors, receiving special badges and invitations to behind-the-scenes events, like strawberry farm tours, VIP seating at performances, or meet-and-greets with local artisans and vendors. • Referral Raffle: Every local who brings an out-of-town guest could enter a raffle for exciting prizes, such as gift certificates to local businesses, event tickets, or a free night at the Treehouse. Both the local and their guest would be entered, increasing engagement and excitement for the event. • Photo Op Stations: Set up designated “Cottage Grove Ambassador” photo stations throughout the festival where locals and their friends can snap photos to commemorate their day and share on social media. Encourage the use of event hashtags to spread the word about the festival and the city’s unique offerings. • Guided Tours and Festival Maps: Provide festival maps or guided walking tours of the town, allowing locals and their guests to explore the historic sites, scenic parks, and other attractions. This can help visitors see the wider appeal of Cottage Grove beyond the festival itself. Expanding the Strawberry Festival: • Local Vendor Spotlights: Integrate booths that highlight the best of Cottage Grove—its restaurants, boutiques, artisans, and service providers. This will allow out-of-town visitors to sample local goods, helping to promote Cottage Grove’s businesses to new audiences. • Strawberry-Themed Competitions: Host fun, interactive events like strawberry-eating contests, strawberry recipe cook-offs, or a “Best Strawberry Dessert” competition, open to both locals and visitors. This can further build engagement and provide entertainment for all. • Interactive Family-Friendly Activities: Expand activities such as strawberry picking, face painting, live music, and strawberry-themed arts and crafts to make the festival a family- friendly event that appeals to all ages. • Entertainment Lineup: Bring in local bands, performers, and cultural exhibits to add an extra layer of excitement and showcase the talent within the community. Key Initiative II PARTNERING & PACKAGING WITH EXISTING ASSETS DISCOVER COTTAGE GROVE 17 Community Benefits: By encouraging locals to bring friends to the Strawberry Festival, you foster a welcoming atmosphere that allows visitors to connect with the community in a fun, meaningful way. This not only enhances tourism but also strengthens the bond between residents and their city, as they take pride in showing off what makes Cottage Grove special. COTTAGE GROVE DINING WEEK: A CULINARY CELEBRATION Launch Cottage Grove Dining Week, a weeklong celebration of the vibrant local food scene designed to encourage both locals and visitors to explore the area’s restaurants. Event Structure: • Special Menus & Pricing: Participating restaurants can create exclusive menus, offering fixed-price specials or discounted signature dishes. • Burger Week Feature: As a special focus within the week, introduce Burger Week, where local restaurants will each offer a unique, limited-time burger creation. Whether it’s a classic cheeseburger or a gourmet burger with a twist, the aim is to spotlight local eateries with creative and flavorful dishes, giving food enthusiasts a reason to try new places. Marketing & PR: • Targeted PR Campaign: Launch a robust PR campaign that reaches beyond Cottage Grove to surrounding communities and regional media outlets. Feature press releases, food blogger engagement, and influencer partnerships to create buzz. Collaborate with local news stations and magazines to showcase participating restaurants and the overall dining experience in Cottage Grove. • Engage with Social Media: Encourage visitors and locals to share their experiences using designated hashtags like #CottageGroveDiningWeek and #CGBurgerWeek to track posts, photos, and reviews across platforms. Offer incentives like dining gift certificates or exclusive event invites for those who post during the week. Key Initiative II PARTNERING & PACKAGING WITH EXISTING ASSETS DISCOVER COTTAGE GROVE 18 Bonus Events at the Farmers’ Market: To make the week even more memorable, host bonus events at the local Farmers’ Market, drawing in visitors who appreciate farm-to-table freshness and community engagement: • Cooking Demonstrations: Invite local chefs to give live cooking demonstrations using ingredients sourced from the market. These demos could showcase recipes featured during Dining Week or highlight seasonal produce from Cottage Grove farms, adding an educational and interactive element for attendees. • Live Music & Entertainment: Incorporate live performances from local musicians and bands to add a festive atmosphere to the Farmers’ Market. Consider family-friendly activities like face painting or arts and crafts to keep the entire community involved. • Pop-Up Food Tastings: Host pop-up booths from participating restaurants, allowing farmers’ market attendees to sample small bites or signature items before visiting the actual restaurants. This can serve as a teaser, encouraging visitors to explore more local spots throughout the week. START SELLING GROUPS NOW BY PARTNERING WITH AREA HOTELS - YES, BRING THEM BUSINESS AND SHARE THE HOTEL TAX REVENUE Just because Cottage Grove has a shortage of hotel rooms does not mean it cannot sell large groups. Consider working-partnering with your neighbors on a program where Cottage Grove brings in large blocks of rooms (i.e. sports tournament or event) in exchange for a percentage of the generated occupancy revenue. Bringing a gift of 50-200 rooms may be worth parting with 35% of the generated room tax. This means you would target selling to groups with a page that shows the available hotels and their group hotel rates as well as places for local deals on dining. Key Initiative II PARTNERING & PACKAGING WITH EXISTING ASSETS DISCOVER COTTAGE GROVE 19 KEY INITIATIVE 3 FACILITATE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (LONG-TERM) What is tourism product development? It’s retail. It’s food. It’s events. It’s industry. It’s transportation. It’s infrastructure. It’s people. Outlined below are some suggestions to consider in developing additional assets to draw visitors. EXPAND LODGING CAPACITY The City understands the need for a hotel. Currently Cottage Grove is missing potential for additional revenue. For example, a new hotel with 90 rooms, with an average room rate of $135 and a 60% occupancy rate with a 3% lodging tax can generate over $80,000 annually in revenue for the city. Incentives for Boutique Lodging: Encourage unique lodging experiences such as tiny homes, cabins, or glamping to attract niche travelers and nature enthusiasts. Chandlerthinks did an informal poll among local business park members via email. Seven businesses responded. The chart below reflects the feedback and the possible leakage that may be occurring. It would make sense to do a more formal survey of Cottage Grove businesses for a more accurate projection of leakage. Projected Leakage Report of Cottage Grove Businesses Generated Overnight Guests Respondent Projections Number of guests staying overnight as a result of Cottage Grove businesses 2,000 % staying not in Cottage Grove 90% Number overnight stays 1,800 ADR $125.00 Hotel revenue $225,000.00 Local sales tax.28 revenue $630.00 Occupancy tax revenue $6,750.00 Outside spending $100 per day (food/gas/retail) $180,000.00 Local sales tax .28 revenue $504.00 New Hotel Potential in Cottage Grove # of rooms 90 Days 365 Room nights 32850 Occupancy rate 65% 21352.5 Land Cost $250,000 (3 acres) 3.1221949 Room rate/night $125 Revenue $2,669,062.50 Construction Cost $10,000,000 MN Sales Tax 6.85% State Sales Tax Revenue $182,830.78 CG City Sales Tax 0.28% CG City Sales Tax Revenue $7,473.38 Lodging Tax 3% Occupancy Tax Revenue $80,071.88 PP Projected spending Key Initiative III FACILITATE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (LONG-TERM) DISCOVER COTTAGE GROVE 20 WINTER WONDERLAND: A MAGICAL HOLIDAY EXPERIENCE Look for opportunities to take existing winter events and create a “Winter Wonderland”. A magical and festive atmosphere that delights locals and draws visitors. This multi-week event can include holiday markets, family-friendly activities, and eye-catching decorations that encourage spending, dining, and even overnight stays at local accommodations. Event Features: 1. Christmas Market: • Artisan Vendors: Create a charming, European-style Christmas market featuring local artisans and craftspeople selling holiday gifts, decorations, homemade goods, and unique Cottage Grove souvenirs. Set up festive stalls adorned with lights and greenery, where visitors can shop for one-of-a-kind holiday treasures. • Seasonal Food & Drinks: Offer stands selling hot cocoa, mulled wine, cider, and festive treats like gingerbread and holiday cookies. • Live Entertainment: Feature carolers and holiday-themed performances throughout the market, enhancing the festive ambiance and making the market a place to linger and enjoy. 2. Ice-Skating Rink: • Central Attraction: Install a temporary outdoor ice-skating rink in a central location in Old Cottage Grove. This can be the heart of the Winter Wonderland, drawing families, couples, and friends for some classic holiday fun. • Skate Rentals: Partner with local businesses or sponsors to offer skate rentals, making the rink accessible to all. Offer discounts for families or multi-day passes to encourage return visits. • Special Events on the Ice: Organize themed skating nights, such as “Skate with Santa,” “Holiday Costume Night,” or “Disco on Ice,” to keep the energy of the rink fresh and appealing throughout the season. Key Initiative III FACILITATE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (LONG-TERM) DISCOVER COTTAGE GROVE 21 3. Christmas Lights Tour: • Best Decorated Contest: Engage the community by holding a contest for the best- decorated home or business. Offer prizes and recognitions, encouraging local participation and adding to the festive spirit. • Lights Show or Display: Consider partnering with a local venue or park to create a large- scale light display or synchronized lights show set to holiday music, becoming a must- see attraction for visitors. 4. Tree Lighting Ceremony: • Kickoff Event: Start the Winter Wonderland festivities with a grand tree lighting ceremony. Invite the mayor or a special guest to flip the switch, and have the moment accompanied by live music, hot cocoa, and maybe even a special appearance by Santa Claus. • Ongoing Attraction: The Christmas tree can remain a focal point throughout the event, serving as a gathering place for photo ops, meet-ups, and festive activities. 5. Santa’s Village & Workshops: • Santa’s Village: Create a whimsical Santa’s Village where families can visit Santa Claus, have their photos taken, and drop off letters for the North Pole. Surround the area with festive props, lights, and Christmas trees for an enchanting experience. • Holiday Workshops: Host holiday-themed workshops such as ornament making, wreath crafting, or gingerbread house building for families and children. Partner with local artists and businesses to run these workshops, adding a personal touch to the experience. Key Initiative III FACILITATE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (LONG-TERM) DISCOVER COTTAGE GROVE 22 Bonus Events & Features: 1. Pop-Up Photo Opportunities: • Set up holiday-themed photo stations around Old Cottage Grove, such as life-size snow globes, giant gift boxes, or a “Sleigh with Santa” display. Encourage visitors to take and share photos using a designated hashtag for social media promotion, spreading the word about Winter Wonderland. 2. Winter-Themed Performances: • Include a schedule of live performances throughout the event, such as local choirs, ballet companies performing The Nutcracker, or even pop-up theater groups staging short holiday plays. This enhances the overall experience while supporting local talent. 3. Snow Play Zone (Weather Permitting): • If weather allows, designate an area where families and children can play in the snow, build snowmen, or have snowball fights. For milder winters, consider creating a synthetic snow zone to ensure fun regardless of weather conditions. Marketing & PR: • Local & Regional Promotion: Leverage local media, social platforms, and regional tourism boards to promote Winter Wonderland as a must-visit holiday destination. Highlight the unique aspects of the event, from the Christmas Market to the ice-skating rink, to draw in families and holiday enthusiasts from nearby towns. • Social Media Engagement: Create engaging content leading up to the event, including behind-the-scenes previews of the setup, interviews with vendors, and giveaways. Use hashtags like #WinterWonderlandCG and #ChristmasInCottageGrove to build excitement and ensure the event reaches a wider audience. • Hotel & Accommodation Packages: Collaborate with hotels in Cottage Grove and Woodbury to create special Winter Wonderland weekend packages, including discounted event tickets, free skating passes, or dining vouchers. This promotes overnight stays and supports local hospitality businesses. (Woodbury can help with the marketing of the event.) Key Initiative III FACILITATE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (LONG-TERM) DISCOVER COTTAGE GROVE 23 Benefits for Cottage Grove: • Tourism Boost: Winter Wonderland can serve as a significant tourism driver, attracting visitors from surrounding regions to Cottage Grove during the holiday season. With festive events and activities catering to all ages, this event can encourage extended stays, increasing the economic impact on local businesses. • Community Spirit: The event fosters a strong sense of community pride and involvement, with local businesses, artisans, and residents coming together to create a memorable holiday experience for both visitors and locals alike. • Year-Round Branding: Establishing Winter Wonderland as an annual event can position Cottage Grove as a holiday destination, giving the town a signature event that draws visitors year after year. This also helps build the town’s brand as a vibrant, family-friendly destination with charm and tradition. BENEFITS OF CEDARHURST MANSION RESTORATION The Cedarhurst Mansion has tremendous opportunity in creating visitor attractive experiences but also for resident gatherings and events. Preserving a community asset and storytelling venue could open doors for many opportunities. • Corporate events • Community and social events • Live concerts • Festivals • Attracting locals and visitors Key Initiative III FACILITATE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (LONG-TERM) DISCOVER COTTAGE GROVE 24 A TOWN CENTER ATTRACTS PEOPLE By creating a town center or gathering place in Cottage Grove, MN, the community can experience enhanced cohesion, economic growth, and a stronger sense of identity, making it an even more attractive place to live, work, and visit. There are also many advantages to a town center such as: Foster Community Engagement – a space for residents to gather, socialize, and build relationships. Events such as farmers’ markets, festivals, and community activities create a sense of belonging and strengthen community ties. Support Local Economy – A vibrant town center encourages local business development, attracting retailers, restaurants, and service providers. This can stimulate job creation and keep more spending within the community, benefiting the local economy. Enhance Walkability and Sustainability – Town centers often incorporate pedestrian-friendly design, reducing the need for car travel. This promotes a more sustainable lifestyle and can lead to healthier, more active communities by encouraging walking and cycling. Cultural and Civic Identity – A central gathering place can become the cultural and civic heart of the community, hosting public art installations, cultural events, and civic activities that reflect the identity and values of Cottage Grove. This helps define the community’s character and history. Attracting Visitors – A well-designed town center can become a destination for people outside of the immediate area. This can boost tourism, drawing visitors to local shops, restaurants, and events, which further supports local businesses. DEVELOP MORE FAMILY-FRIENDLY ATTRACTIONS Cottage Grove lacks entertainment options, especially for families and children. We recommend working with private investors to develop additional family-friendly attractions, such as: • Indoor arcade with games, laser tag, and mini-golf. • Outdoor adventure park offering zip-lining, obstacle courses, and climbing walls. • The Big Swing. Pigeon Forge Town Center Key Initiative III FACILITATE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (LONG-TERM) DISCOVER COTTAGE GROVE 25 LEVERAGE NATURAL AND RECREATIONAL ASSETS • Outdoor Adventure Promotion: Cottage Grove’s parks and trails could be marketed as a destination for outdoor recreation, including hiking, biking, kayaking, and bird-watching. Host outdoor events like 5Ks or nature walks to draw enthusiasts. • Mississippi River Access: Develop waterfront activities like kayaking and paddle boats to capitalize on the scenic beauty and the calm backwaters of the Mississippi River. • Winter Tourism: Promote winter sports like cross-country skiing, ice fishing, and snowshoeing. Consider hosting winter festivals or sporting events to bring tourists during the colder months. WINERY/BREWERY If possible, look to pitch to investors to develop and invest in a local winery, brewery or distillery. These venues could host events like tastings, live music nights, or craft beer festivals. These long-term plans aim to address the structural challenges facing Cottage Grove’s tourism sector, such as limited lodging and meeting spaces, while capitalizing on its existing strengths. By focusing on strategic partnerships, new product development, and targeted marketing campaigns, Cottage Grove can build a sustainable, year-round tourism industry. Fitgers Brewery, Duluth, MN Key Initiative III FACILITATE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (LONG-TERM) DISCOVER COTTAGE GROVE 26 KEY INITIATIVE 4 – ON-GOING MARKETING Marketing Priorities: 1. Branding 2. Website 3. Visitors guide 4. Social media 5. Content development 6. Targeted paid promotion (digital ad campaign) 7. Build database (for E-newsletters and future research) BRANDING Cottage Grove is a great place that is perceived as clean and relatively new. It does not have a strong image at this time. Development of a strong destination brand helps shape all of your marketing and affects your overall attractiveness (and should be intentional). Cottage Grove tourism should develop a well-planned brand direction for messaging to others and locals! Destination branding can be quite the political process. After all, promoting a place that so many people call home is personal. We have assisted in over 100 communities in the process of branding and can provide detailed direction as needed. WEBSITE The Cottage Grove website will need to be updated with new content and graphic design reflecting its new branding direction. It also will need to be updated to reflect sharper content that is more focused on tourism. VISITORS GUIDE The 2024 Visitors Guide was nice but lacked tourism focus. It included messaging that was not normally associated with tourism (more so for Chamber and community-minded messages). We recommended reducing pages (to save money) and focus content around the places to Shop, Play and Eat in Cottage Grove. The marketing team incorporated these changes in the 2025 Visitors Guide. SOCIAL MEDIA As long as you have personnel to manage social media, it will be your greatest marketing channel. Develop a planned social media calendar to reflect tourism priorities. It should provide a posting schedule 4-5 times/week and include photography and video. CONTENT DEVELOPMENT Great photography and ongoing videos are going to be important if Cottage Grove is going to promote its beauty and attractiveness. Planning and budgeting for this is important and doesn’t happen by accident. Key Initiative IV ON-GOING MARKETING DISCOVER COTTAGE GROVE 27 TARGETED PAID PROMOTION (DIGITAL AD CAMPAIGN) Cottage Grove is still in its infancy as a destination, but creating regional awareness and visitor foot traffic from the Minneapolis-St. Paul metro area has to start somewhere. For now, Cottage Grove should focus on what it does best, promoting its packaged experiences of shopping and dining combined with key events and activities. Media channels to consider would be: 1. Social Media Ads (Facebook, Instagram): • Short, engaging video reels showcasing local restaurants, wedding venues, and event highlights • Carousel ads featuring vibrant festival imagery with key details (dates, attractions, food vendors) • Geo-targeted reaching users in the Twin Cities 2. Google Display & Search Ads: • Retargeting visitors who engage with the campaign Targeted groups or things to promote would be: a. Business travelers: this may require development of a specific program for your existing travelers. Start with meeting your corporate partners and asking for their input. The result may not be advertising as much as it is program development. Perhaps it is the development of in-house brochure touting Things to Do-Shop-Eat in Cottage Grove! Schedule meetings (or Zooms) with your many corporate partners starting now for the next three months). b. Strawberry Festival: This is your signature event of the year. Leverage it the best you can to drive attendance and even allow some of your messaging to reach the locals. c. Ice and a meal: A nice test would be to target Twin Cities area teams (yes you can get a list of schools and neighborhoods that are coming to Cottage Grove and send messaging their way). “Come early or Stay Late from your hockey time and explore more in Cottage Grove”. BUILD DATABASE (FOR E-NEWSLETTERS AND FUTURE RESEARCH) Cottage Grove tourism needs to intentionally build its inquiry and visitor database. This will allow you to eventually begin an email marketing effort (monthly or so to begin) and bi-annual research measuring visitors’ actions (did they visit and if so, what did they do). This allows Cottage Grove tourism to provide an ROI for its marketing efforts. Key Initiative IV ON-GOING MARKETING DISCOVER COTTAGE GROVE 28 KEY INITIATIVE 5 – TRACKING & REPORTING PROVIDE REGULAR UPDATES Be tenacious in measuring and reporting tourism. On a semi-annual basis give a State of Tourism Report during a commission meeting or tourism’s own Annual Meeting. Consider recognizing a Lodging Partner of the Year and a Hospitality Partner of the Year for those who have helped in promoting tourism in Cottage Grove. Create marketing materials on the impact of tourism during National Tourism week. Key Initiative V TRACKING & REPORTING DISCOVER COTTAGE GROVE 29 2022 OFFICIAL VISITORS GUIDE MORE THAN YOU IMAGINE DISCOVER MORE THAN YOU IMAGINE DISCOVER MORE THAN YOU IMAGINE DISCOVER MORE THAN YOU IMAGINE DISCOVER MORE THAN YOU IMAGINE DISCOVER MORE THAN YOU IMAGINE DISCOVER MORE THAN YOU IMAGINE DISCOVER MORE THAN YOU IMAGINE DISCOVER MORE THAN YOU IMAGINE DISCOVER Budget BUDGET Year 1 Year 2 Staff Salaries for Director and Coordinator $80,000 $80,000 Identity & Brand Development $70,000 0 Stakeholder mtgs/food/merch $10,000 $10,000 Conferences $4,000 $4,000 Travel $6,000 $6,000 Website $10,000 N/A Content development $20,000 $20,000 Collateral $15,000 $15,000 Advertising $75,000 $75,000 Events/Promotional Items $10,000 $20,000 Event Grants $30,000 $50,000 TOTAL BUDGET $330,000 $280,000 ABOUT CHANDLERTHINKS, LLC Founded in 2010 and located in Nashville, TN; Chandlerthinks, LLC is a place marketing firm that provides marketing-based solutions for municipalities, communities and destinations seeking to create a strong identity and purposeful direction. To learn more, visit our website at www.chandlerthinks.com. Copyright 2025 Chandlerthinks, LLC All rights reserved. All information contained herein is from sources deemed reliable; however, no representation or warranty is made to the accuracy thereof. 30 1 City Council Action Request 7.H. Meeting Date 3/5/2025 Department Administration Agenda Category Action Item Title Ordinance 1094 - Lodging Tax Definitions Amendment Staff Recommendation Approve Ordinance 1094, amending Chapter 1-5-5 of the Cottage Grove City Code related to lodging tax. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. Memo - Ordinance 1094 (amendment to ordinance) 2. Ordinance - With markups 3. Ordinance 1094 - Clean To:City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From:Phil Jents, Communication Manager Date:February 25, 2025 Subject:Ordinance 1094 – Lodging Tax Definitions Amendment Introduction/Background Attached for your review and consideration is Ordinance 1094 which amends Chapter 1-5-5 of the Cottage Grove City Code pertaining to the definitions for the City’s lodging tax. The proposed amendments add and clarify certain definitions to ensure clarity and proper implementation of the lodging tax by the commissioner of the department of revenue. The key changes include: •Lodging and Related Services: The definition is amended to include specific examples such as “hotel, motel, rooming house, short-term vacation rental (i.e. VRBO, Airbnb), campground or resort, where renting or leasing is for a period of less than thirty (30) consecutive days” to provide clarity. •Operator or Accommodations Provider: This definition is amended to clarify that it pertains to any person or entity that furnishes lodging and related services to the general public for compensation. The term “furnishes” is further defined to include the sale of use or possession, or the sale of the right to use or possess. The purpose of these amendments is to refine the ordinance and clarify the definitions for the implementation of the lodging tax. Staff Recommendation Approve Ordinance 1094 amending Chapter 1-5-5 of the Cottage Grove City Code related to lodging tax. ORDINANCE NO. [NUMBER] AN ORDINANCE FOR THE CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING CHAPTER 1-5-5 OF THE COTTAGE GROVE CITY CODE RELATING TO LODGING TAX The City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, Washington County, Minnesota, does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1. AMENDMENT. “The Code of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota,” Section 1-5-5 A. 2 shall be amended by adding the following definitions: ACCOMMODATIONS INTERMEDIARY. Any person or entity, other than an accommodations provider, that facilitates the sale of lodging as defined in subdivision 3, and that charges a room charge to a customer. The term “facilitates the sale” includes brokering, coordinating, or in any way arranging for the purchase of or the right to use accommodations by a customer. COMMISSIONER. The commissioner of revenue of the state of Minnesota or a person to whom the commissioner has delegated functions. STATE SALES AND USE TAX LAWS AND RULES. Those provisions of the state revenue laws applicable to state sales and use tax imposition, administration, collection, and enforcement, including Minnesota Statutes, chapters 270C, 289A, 297A, 469A, and Minnesota Rules, chapter 8130, as amended from time to time. SECTION 2. AMENDMENT. “The Code of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota,” Section 1-5-5 A. 2 shall be amended by amending following definitions: LODGING AND RELATED SERVICES: The furnishing for consideration of lodging to transient guests at a hotel, motel, rooming house, short term vacation rental (i.e. VRBO, Airbnb), campground or resort, where the renting or leasing is for a period of less than thirty (30) consecutive days. OPERATOR or ACCOMMODATIONS PROVIDER: Any person or entity that furnishes lodging and related services to the general public for compensation. The term “furnishes” includes the sale of use or possession, or the sale of the right to use or possess. Any person, corporation, partnership, or association who provides lodging to others. SECTION 3. SUMMARY PUBLICATION. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 412.191, in the case of a lengthy ordinance, a summary may be published. While a copy of the entire ordinance is available without cost at the office of the City Clerk, the following summary is approved by the City Council and shall be published in lieu of publishing the entire ordinance: The ordinance amendments adds and clarifies definitions for implementation of the lodging tax by the commissioner of the department of revenue. SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to law. Passed this [Day] day of [Month Year]. __________________________ Myron Bailey, Mayor Attest: ___________________________ Tamara Anderson, City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 1094 AN ORDINANCE FOR THE CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING CHAPTER 1-5-5 OF THE COTTAGE GROVE CITY CODE RELATING TO LODGING TAX The City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, Washington County, Minnesota, does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1. AMENDMENT. “The Code of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota,” Section 1-5-5 A. 2 shall be amended by adding the following definitions: ACCOMMODATIONS INTERMEDIARY. Any person or entity, other than an accommodations provider, that facilitates the sale of lodging as defined in subdivision 3, and that charges a room charge to a customer. The term “facilitates the sale” includes brokering, coordinating, or in any way arranging for the purchase of or the right to use accommodations by a customer. COMMISSIONER. The commissioner of revenue of the state of Minnesota or a person to whom the commissioner has delegated functions. STATE SALES AND USE TAX LAWS AND RULES. Those provisions of the state revenue laws applicable to state sales and use tax imposition, administration, collection, and enforcement, including Minnesota Statutes, chapters 270C, 289A, 297A, 469A, and Minnesota Rules, chapter 8130, as amended from time to time. SECTION 2. AMENDMENT. “The Code of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota,” Section 1-5-5 A. 2 shall be amended by amending following definitions: LODGING AND RELATED SERVICES: The furnishing for consideration of lodging to transient guests at a hotel, motel, rooming house, short term vacation rental (i.e. VRBO, Airbnb), campground or resort, where the renting or leasing is for a period of less than thirty (30) consecutive days. OPERATOR or ACCOMMODATIONS PROVIDER: Any person or entity that furnishes lodging and related services to the general public for compensation. The term “furnishes” includes the sale of use or possession, or the sale of the right to use or possess. SECTION 3. SUMMARY PUBLICATION. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 412.191, in the case of a lengthy ordinance, a summary may be published. While a copy of the entire ordinance is available without cost at the office of the City Clerk, the following summary is approved by the City Council and shall be published in lieu of publishing the entire ordinance: The ordinance amendments adds and clarifies definitions for implementation of the lodging tax by the commissioner of the department of revenue. SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to law. Passed this 5th day of March. __________________________ Myron Bailey, Mayor Attest: ___________________________ Tamara Anderson, City Clerk 1 City Council Action Request 7.I. Meeting Date 3/5/2025 Department Administration Agenda Category Action Item Title Grant Donation - TJX Law Enforcement Staff Recommendation Accept the TJX Law Enforcement Grant donation in the amount of $10,000 for the lease of Flock cameras. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. Public Safety Memo - TJX Donation 02262025 (1) To:Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From:Peter J Koerner, Director of Public Safety Date:February 26, 2025 Subject: TJX LAW ENFORCEMENT GRANT DONATION ACCEPTANCE $10,000.00 Introduction Priority 4.1.6 of the police department's five-year strategic plan focuses on deploying and managing Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) in patrol vehicles and evaluating the use of stationary ALPR cameras (Flock). These cameras will be integrated into our existing public safety infrastructure, enhancing our ability to monitor and protect the City of Cottage Grove. By leveraging this advanced technology, we aim to improve the safety and security of shopping centers, business districts and its patrons, deterring criminal activity such as theft, shoplifting, and vehicle-related crimes. The ALPR cameras will also help us track and respond to stolen vehicles, KOPS (Keep Our Police Safe) officer safety alerts, and missing persons alerts in real time, allowing for faster law enforcement intervention when necessary. The data collected by the ALPR cameras will be analyzed in real time, allowing officers to identify patterns and trends that can lead to the prevention or faster resolution of criminal activities. This data can also be used to collaborate with other law enforcement agencies in nearby jurisdictions, enhancing overall security efforts and combating Organized Retail Crime (ORC). Detective Jordan Ziebarth applied for two non-matching $5,000 donations from the TJX Law Enforcement Grant that would be utilized to purchase and install Flock (ALPR) camera leases. These donations will help partially fund a new technology-driven initiative to investigate crimes where vehicles are used. Recommendation Accept the TJX Law Enforcement Grant donation in the amount of $10,000 for the lease of Flock cameras and authorize the City Administrator to finalize the agreement. 1 City Council Action Request 7.J. Meeting Date 3/5/2025 Department Public Safety Agenda Category Action Item Title MN Department of Public Safety - Therapy Dog Grant Award Staff Recommendation Accept and approve the Law Enforcement and Fire Department Therapy Dog grant award in the amount of $10,000. Budget Implication No impact to budget. Attachments 1. Therapy K9 Grant Award Feb 21 2. MN DPS Grant Agreement (Therapy K9) To:Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From:Peter J Koerner, Director of Public Safety Date:February 21, 2025 Subject: MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY THERAPY DOG GRANT ACCEPTANCE $10,000.00 INTRODUCTION In the police 5-year strategic plan we identified priority #1: safety and security (special services) that we will maintain an effective K9 program and consider adding a therapy K9. The therapy K9 will promote community engagement, case management & crisis intervention, and officer wellness. In 2024 budget workshops, council encouraged us to explore donation and grant opportunities for implementing the therapy K9 program. The department has identified a Case Management Detective Scott Shaver as the handler of the therapy K9 and the program has been created. Training will be provided by Soldier 6 and the costs of the program will be paid through the grant award. There will not be any impact on our budget. A grant opportunity through the Minnesota Department of Public Safety for the Law Enforcement and Fire Department Therapy Dog (LEFTD) grant was discovered, so Sergeant Patrick Young submitted an application at the end of 2024. We were notified that we were awarded the entire amount requested of $10,000.00. The grant contract agreement with the Minnesota Department of Public Safety was reviewed and approved by our City Attorney. RECOMMENDATION Accept and approve the Law Enforcement and Fire Department Therapy Dog grant award in the amount of $10,000.00. 1 City Council Action Request 7.K. Meeting Date 3/5/2025 Department Administration Agenda Category Action Item Title Fee Table Amendment - Tax Increment Financing Staff Recommendation Approve Ordinance 1095 amending the City Fee Table and adding a $10,000 Tax Increment Financing (TIF) escrow for each proposed TIF project. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. Memo - Fee Table Change (TIF Analysis) 2. Ordinance - 1095 (AN ORDINANCE FOR THE CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING THE CITY FEE TABLE - TIF ESCROW) 3. 2025 Proposed Fee's (Council 2025-02-26) To:City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From:Brenda Malinowski, Finance Director Tamara Anderson, City Clerk Date:February 26, 2025 Subject:Implementation of $10,000 Escrow for Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Introduction/Background To ensure the thorough and timely analysis of potential Tax Increment Financing (TIF) districts, a dedicated escrow of $10,000 will be established for each proposed TIF project and added to the City Fee Table as a new fee. This escrow ensures cost recovery for TIF analysis, shifting the financial burden to the developer. This approach eliminates the risk of incurring costs to the EDA and the potential for losses if a TIF application is not completed or approved. This proactive measure will improve the TIF application process by ensuring efficient resource allocation. Implementation Details: •The $10,000 TIF analysis escrow will be applied to all new TIF applications submitted on or after March 5, 2025. We believe these adjustments are necessary to maintain financial stability and ensure the efficient delivery of services. Staff Recommendation Approve Ordinance 1095 amending the City Fee Table and adding a $10,000 Tax Increment Financing (TIF) escrow for each proposed TIF project. ORDINANCE NO. 1095 AN ORDINANCE FOR THE CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA, AMENDING THE CITY FEE TABLE The City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, Washington County, Minnesota, does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1. AMENDMENT. The City Fee Table administered by the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, shall be amended as specified in Attachment A effective upon publication and will remain in effect until amended or otherwise specified. SECTION 2. PUBLICATION BY TITLE AND SUMMARY. Pursuant to Minnesota Statute Section 412.191, subd. 4, in the case of a lengthy ordinance, a summary may be published in lieu of the entire ordinance. The entire ordinance has been posted in accordance with State Statute 415.19 on the City's Public Notices board at City Hall, and on the City's website under Pending Ordinances at least ten days before consideration. A copy of the entire ordinance is available at the office of the City Clerk and the fee table in its entirety will be published on the City's website. The following summary is approved by the City Council and shall be published in lieu of the entire ordinance: City of Cottage Grove Ordinance 1095 The Cottage Grove City Council passed Ordinance 1095, which amends the City Fee Table in the following category 3/5/2025: A new tax Increment Financing (TIF) districts dedicated escrow of $10,000 has been established for each proposed TIF project and added to the City Fee Table as a new fee. The full text of Ordinance 1095 is available at Cottage Grove City Hall during regular business hours and the new fee table will also be available on the city website at cottagegrovemn.gov, search City Fee Table, after it becomes effective. SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect after its passage and publication according to law. Passed this 5th of March, 2025 __________________________ Myron Bailey, Mayor Attest: ___________________________ Tamara Anderson, City Clerk Published in the Pioneer Press on____________. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 AB C H Category Subcategory Item 2025 Fees Ambulance Ambulance Advanced Life Support Stand-By (Paramedic without Ambulance) $80.00 per hour Ambulance Advanced Life Support Stand-By (EMT and Paramedic with Ambulance) $220.00 per hour Ambulance Advanced Life Support Treatment without Transport (includes all medication administration, $540.00 Ambulance Advanced Life Support Treatment and Transport - Tier 1 $2,690.00 Ambulance Advanced Life Support Treatment and Transport - Tier 2 $3,010.00 Ambulance Basic Life Support Stand-By (EMT without Ambulance)$55.00 per hour Ambulance Basic Life Support Stand-By (2 EMTs with Ambulance)$160.00 per hour Ambulance Basic Life Support Evaluation without Transport (includes assessment, vital signs (including pulse oximetry), blood glucose measurement, basic No Charge Resident; $540.00 Non Resident Ambulance Basic Life Support Treatment and Transport $2,150.00 Ambulance Other Mileage Charge (Per Loaded Mile From City Limits) $40.00 Ambulance Other Non-Resident Fee $230.00 Ambulance Other Special Services EMS Charge $440.00 Animal Animal Impound City-Ordered, Administrative Fee Actual Cost Incurred By Impound Facility Animal Impound City-Ordered, Facility Fee Actual Cost Incurred By Impound Facility Animal Other Administrative hearing fee, dangerous/potentially dangerous dog $200.00 Animal Licenses Dog/Cat, Duplicate Tag $5.00 each Animal Licenses Dog/Cat, Multiple Animal $100.00 Per Calendar Year Animal Licenses Dog/Cat, Non-Spayed/Non-Neutered (1 Calendar Year) $20.00 Renewal Animal Licenses Dog/Cat, Non-Spayed/Non-Neutered (Lifetime License) $75.00 Animal Licenses Dog/Cat, Spayed/Neutered (1 Calendar Year) $15.00 Renewal Animal Licenses Dog/Cat, Spayed/Neutered (No Micro-chip Lifetime License) $60.00 Animal Licenses Dog/Cat, Spayed/Neutered (Micro-chipped Lifetime License) $50.00 Animal Licenses Kennel, Commercial $50.00 per year Animal Licenses Goats, Temporary Keeping of, Vegetation Management $50.00 Per Calendar Year Animal Registrations Dog, Potentially Dangerous $60.00 Spayed/Neutered; $65.00 Non-Spayed/Non- Neutered per Calendar Year Animal Registrations Dog, Dangerous $60.00 Spayed/Neutered; $65.00 Non-Spayed/Non- Neutered per Calendar Year Development Development Area Charges, Commercial/Industrial Sanitary Sewer, Remainder of City $2,410.00 per acre Development Area Charges, Commercial/Industrial Sanitary Sewer, South District Lower $13,470.00 per acre Development Area Charges, Commercial/Industrial Sanitary Sewer, South District Upper $5,070.00 per acre Development Area Charges, Commercial/Industrial Storm Water Facilities, Remainder of City $11,590.00 per acre Development Area Charges, Commercial/Industrial Storm Water Facilities, West Draw $12,910.00 per acre Development Area Charges, Commercial/Industrial Waterworks $7,460.00 per acre Development Area Charges, Residential Sanitary Sewer, Remainder of City $1,720.00 per acre Development Area Charges, Residential Sanitary Sewer, South District Lower $9,550.00 per acre Development Area Charges, Residential Sanitary Sewer, South District Upper $3,600.00 per acre Development Area Charges, Residential Sanitary Sewer, Upper Ravine $8,800.00 per acre Development Area Charges, Residential Sanitary Sewer, West Draw Area 1 $2,150.00 per acre Development Area Charges, Residential Sanitary Sewer, West Draw Area 2 $3,540.00 per acre Development Area Charges, Residential Sanitary Sewer, Utility Staging Area 2 $7,190.00 per acre Development Area Charges, Commercial/Industrial Sanitary Sewer, Utility Staging Area 2 $10,140.00 per acre Development Area Charges, Commercial/Industrial Storm Water Facilities, East Ravine $13,570.00 per acre Development Area Charges, Commercial/Industrial Storm Water Facilities, South District $13,370.00 per acre Development Area Charges, Residential Storm Water Facilities, Remainder of City - Ag Developed $8,310.00 per acre Development Area Charges, Residential Storm Water Facilities, Remainder of City - Estate $5,780.00 per acre Development Area Charges, Residential Storm Water Facilities, Remainder of City - High Density $11,590.00 per acre Development Area Charges, Residential Storm Water Facilities, Remainder of City - Medium Density $9,660.00 per acre Development Area Charges, Residential Storm Water Facilities, Remainder of City - Single Family $7,940.00 per acre Development Area Charges, Residential Storm Water Facilities, SW Drainage Area - Multi Family $11,380.00 per acre Development Area Charges, Residential Storm Water Facilities, SW Drainage Area - Single Family $8,700.00 per acre Development Area Charges, Residential Storm Water Facilities, Upper Ravine - Multi Family $6,060.00 per acre Development Area Charges, Residential Storm Water Facilities, Upper Ravine - Single Family $5,140.00 per acre Development Area Charges, Residential Storm Water Facilities, West Draw - Ag Developed $9,250.00 per acre Development Area Charges, Residential Storm Water Facilities, West Draw - Estate $6,460.00 per acre Development Area Charges, Residential Storm Water Facilities, West Draw - High Density $12,920.00 per acre 1 AB C H 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 Development Area Charges, Residential Storm Water Facilities, West Draw - Medium Density $10,770.00 per acre Development Area Charges, Residential Storm Water Facilities, West Draw - Single Family $8,610.00 per acre Development Area Charges, Residential Storm Water Facilities, South District - High Density $13,370.00 per acre Development Area Charges, Residential Storm Water Facilities, South District - Medium Density $11,170.00 per acre Development Area Charges, Residential Storm Water Facilities, South District - Single Family $9,160.00 per acre Development Area Charges, Residential Storm Water Facilities, East Ravine - High Density $13,570.00 per acre Development Area Charges, Residential Storm Water Facilities, East Ravine - Medium Density $11,330.00 per acre Development Area Charges, Residential Storm Water Facilities, East Ravine - Single Family $9,280.00 per acre Development Area Charges, Residential Water Works, Remainder of City $6,010.00 per acre Development Connection Fees, Commercial/Industrial Sanitary Sewer $1,560.00 per acre Development Connection Fees, Commercial/Industrial Water Works $2,310.00 per acre Development Connection Fees, Residential Sanitary Sewer, Entire City $410.00 per unit Development Connection Fees, Residential Water Works, Entire City $330.00 per unit Development Engineering Telecommunication Facilities Lease (Escrow Fee and Contract Required; Tenant Responsible for Additional Consulting, Planning or Building Permit Fees) $46,350.00/Year with 4% Annual Lease Rate Escalator (Leased Space in Excess of Maximum Area Prorated) Development Engineering Telecommunication Facilities Lease (Escrow Fee and Contract Required; Tenant Responsible for Additional Consulting, Planning or Building Permit Fees) $46,350.00/Year with 4% Annual Lease Rate Escalator (Leased Space in Excess of Maximum Area Prorated) Development Engineering Telecommunication Facilities Lease (Escrow Fee and Contract Required; Tenant Responsible for Additional Consulting, Planning or Building Permit Fees) $46,350.00/Year with 4% Annual Lease Rate Escalator (Leased Space in Excess of Maximum Area Prorated) Development Engineering Telecommunication Facilities Lease (Escrow Fee and Contract Required; Tenant Responsible for Additional Consulting, Planning or Building Permit Fees) $46,350.00/Year with 4% Annual Lease Rate Escalator (Leased Space in Excess of Maximum Area Prorated) Development Engineering Telecommunication Facilities Lease (Escrow Fee and Contract Required; Tenant Responsible for Additional Consulting, Planning or $46,350.00/Year with 4% Annual Lease Rate Escalator (Leased Space in Excess of Maximum Area Prorated) Development Engineering Telecommunication Facilities Lease (Generator Fee) Lease Rate Escalator Development Engineering Telecommunication Facilities Escrow Fee $10,000.00 Development Engineering City Concept Review, Public Improvement (Private Developer) 1% Development Engineering City Design Escrow, Public Improvement (Private Developer, Public Design)5% Development Engineering City Engineering Administration Fee, Public Improvement (Private Developer)2% Development Engineering City Engineering Administration Fee, Public Project 4% Development Engineering City Inspection Escrow, Public Improvement (Private Developer, Private Design) - $0 - $1 million project valuation 6% Development Engineering City Inspection Escrow, Public Improvement (Private Developer, Private Design) - Project valuation greater than $1 million 5% Development Engineering City Inspection/Testing Escrow, Public Improvement (Private Developer, Public Design)10% Development Engineering Hourly Rate for Engineering and Staff Time Actual Cost Development Engineering Plan Review Escrow, Public Improvement (Private Developer, Private Design) - Project valuation greater than $1 million 2% Development Engineering Plan Review Escrow, Public Improvement (Private Developer, Private Design) - $0 - $1 million project valuation 3% Development Engineering Private Commercial Site Improvements - $0 - $100, 000 Valuation $300.00 Base Fee for Up To The First $20,000 Site Improvement Valuation; $13.00 per Additional $1,000 Site Improvement Valuation Development Engineering Private Commercial Site Improvements - $500,001 - $1,000,000 Valuation $4,300.00 Base Fee for First $500,000 Site Improvement Valuation; $5.00 per Additional $1,000 Site Improvement Valuation Development Engineering Private Commercial Site Improvements - Greater than $1,000,000 valuation $6,600.00 Base Fee for First $1,000,000 Site Improvement Valuation; $4.5 per Additional $1,000 Site Improvement Valuation Development Engineering Private Commercial Site Improvements $100, 001 - $500,000 Valuation $1,300.00 Base Fee for First $100,000 Site Improvement Valuation; 8.00 per Additional $1,000 Site Improvement Valuation Development Miscellaneous Business Park AUAR $111.00 per Acre Development Miscellaneous Administrative Use Permit, Commercial $565.00 Plus $5,000.00 Escrow Development Miscellaneous Administrative Use Permit, Residential $565.00 Plus $5,000.00 Escrow Development Miscellaneous Agricultural Preservation Documentation Processing $150.00 Development Miscellaneous Business Subsidy Application $10,000.00 Escrow (Unused Escrow Amount Returned) Development Miscellaneous Comprehensive Plan $50.00 Paper Copy/$10 Digital Development Miscellaneous Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Map or Text $670.00 + $55.00 GIS Fee + $2,500.00 Escrow Development Miscellaneous Concept Plan Review $1,080.00 Plus $20.00 Per Acre; $1,000.00 Escrow Development Miscellaneous Conditional Use Permit, Commercial $565.00 Plus $5,000.00 Escrow Development Miscellaneous Conditional Use Permit, Interim $565.00 Plus $5,000.00 Escrow Development Miscellaneous Conditional Use Permit, Residential $565.00 Plus $5,000.00 Escrow Development Miscellaneous East Ravine AUAR Charge $120.00 Per Acre 1 AB C H 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 Development Miscellaneous Environmental Assessment Worksheet $620.00 Plus Actual Costs Development Miscellaneous Financial Guarantee, Escrow for Subdivision Improvements Public Improvements – 125% of Estimated Cost. Boulevard, Landscaping Improvements - 150% of Estimated Cost. Development Miscellaneous Historic Preservation Delisting $515.00 Development Miscellaneous Historic Preservation Designation $515.00 Development Miscellaneous Lot Grading and Corner Lot Pin Compliance Escrow $1,000.00 Per Lot Development Miscellaneous Metropolitan Council SAC Charge $2,485.00 Per Unit for Applicable 2025 Permits Development Miscellaneous Mining, Annual Inspection and Review $2,060.00 Development Miscellaneous Mining, Permit Removal per Occurrence Under 100,000 tons - $300.00. Over 100,000 tons - $550.00 Development Miscellaneous Natural Resources Inventory $70.00 Per Paper Copy Development Miscellaneous Off-Site Stormwater Ponding Fee Reference City Stormwater Management Plan Development Miscellaneous Park Land Dedication, Commercial Minimum of 10% of the Buildable Land within the Development. Development Miscellaneous Park Land Dedication, Commercial Estimated $8,400.00 Per Acre or 4% of the Fair Market Value, whichever is greater. Development Miscellaneous Park Land Dedication, Industrial $8,400.00 Development Miscellaneous Park Land Dedication, Residential Minimum of 10% of the Buildable Land within the Development. Development Miscellaneous Park Land Dedication, Residential $4,900.00 Per Unit or 10% of the Fair Market Value, whichever is greater. Development Miscellaneous Park Land Dedication, Residential $3,600.00 Per Unit or 10% of the Fair Market Value, whichever is greater. Development Miscellaneous Park Land Dedication, Residential $3,600.00 Per Unit or 10% of the Fair Market Value, whichever is greater. Development Miscellaneous Park Land Dedication, Residential $2,200.00 Per Unit or 10% of the Fair Market Value, whichever is greater. Development Miscellaneous Park Land Dedication, Residential $8,400.00 Per Acre or 10% of the Fair Market Value, whichever is greater. Development Miscellaneous Plat, Final $360.00 + $100.00/Acre + $5,000.00 Escrow Development Miscellaneous Plat, Preliminary $565.00 + $50.00 Per Lot/Unit + $5,000.00 Escrow Development Miscellaneous Public ROW and Easement Vacations $360.00 Development Miscellaneous PUD (Planned Unit Development) $900 Plus a $2,000 Escrow Development Miscellaneous Re-addressing $150.00 Development Miscellaneous Sealcoating, Street, New Subdivision $1.25 Per Square Yard Development Miscellaneous Sealcoating, Trails $2.50 Per Square Yard Development Miscellaneous Sign Ordinance $15.00 Per Paper Copy / $10.00 Digital Format Development Miscellaneous Signs, Illegal, Return of $10.00 Per Sign Development Miscellaneous Site Plan $500.00 Plus $5,000 Escrow Development Miscellaneous Sketch Plan Review $205.00 Plus $500.00 Escrow Development Miscellaneous Street Lighting - New Developments $6.32/Lot/Month for 24 Months Development Miscellaneous Street Renaming $200.00 (Plus Sign Material and Labor for Installation) Development Miscellaneous Subdivision, Minor $500.00 Plus $2,000 Escrow Development Miscellaneous Tree Mitigation Reference Title 11-3-13 Development Miscellaneous Tree Mitigation $150.00 Per Required Replacement Inch Development Miscellaneous Variance, Post-Construction $925.00 Development Miscellaneous Variance, Pre-Construction $300.00 Development Miscellaneous Zoning Amendment, Text or Map $665.00 Plus $2,000.00 Escrow Development Miscellaneous Zoning Appeal $310.00 Development Miscellaneous Zoning Letter $100.00 Development Miscellaneous Zoning Ordinance $30.00 Per Paper Copy / $10 Digital Format Development Miscellaneous Park and Open Space Identification Markers $175/Post Fines Fines Code Enforcement Weeds, Tall, Abatement $55.00 Plus Actual Cost Fines Code Enforcement Weeds, Tall, Abatement $105.00 Plus Actual Cost Fines Code Enforcement Weeds, Tall, Abatement $205.00 Plus Actual Cost Fines License Cannabinoid & Low Potency THC, Underage Sale $500.00 (plus 1-day suspension) or, in lieu of the Fines License Cannabinoid & Low Potency THC, Underage Sale $1,000.00 (Plus 3-Day Suspension) Fines License Cannabinoid & Low Potency THC, Underage Sale $2,000.00 (Plus 7-Day Suspension) Fines License Cannabinoid & Low Potency THC, Underage Sale 30-day Suspension Fines License False Alarms, Commercial (0-4)No Charge Fines License False Alarms, Commercial (5-6)$75.00 Each 1 AB C H 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 Fines License False Alarms, Commercial (7-9)$150.00 Each Fines License False Alarms, Commercial (10+)$300.00 Each Fines License Liquor, Underage Sale $500.00 (plus 1-day suspension) or, in lieu of the suspension and the fine, at the City Council's discretion, participation of all employees in an educational program approved by the Public Safety Director Fines License Liquor, Underage Sale $1,000.00 (Plus 3-Day Suspension) Fines License Liquor, Underage Sale $1,500.00 (Plus 7-Day Suspension) Fines License Liquor, Underage Sale Revocation Fines License Tobacco, Underage Sale, Licensee $300.00 Fines License Tobacco, Underage Sale, Licensee $600.00 Fines License Tobacco, Underage Sale, Licensee $1,000.00 (Plus 7-Day Suspension) Fines License Tobacco, Underage Sale, Licensee License Revocation Fines License Tobacco, Underage Sales, Employee/Seller $50.00 General Services General Services Copying/Printing Copies $0.25 General Services Copying/Printing City Maps, Urban or Rural $5.00 Each General Services Copying/Printing Printing, Large Format, Black and White $5.00 Each General Services Copying/Printing Printing, Large Format, Color $10.00 Each General Services Finance Assessment Search $20.00 General Services Finance Credit Card Fee's - For All Activities Except Golf, Ice Arena, HERO Center, and Recreation. $2.50 or 3.75% (or actual cost of processing the credit card) General Services Finance Credit Card Fee's - Recreation 6.98% for online payments (or actual cost of processing credit card) General Services Finance Finance Charge on Accounts Receivable Aged Greater than 30 Days 1.5% Per Month or $1.00 Minimum General Services Finance Finance, Projects 3% General Services Finance Nonsufficient Fund Charge $35.00 General Services Finance Tax-Exempt Revenue Bond Financing 1% of the First $10 Million in Requested Financing, with 1/2 of the 1% Fee Being Charged on the Remaining Issue General Services Finance Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Escrow $10,000.00 General Services Finance Administrative fee for conduit debt Actual out of Pocket Costs General Services Miscellaneous Administration, Projects 2% General Services Miscellaneous Special Meeting Fee $500.00 General Services Miscellaneous Appeals to the city administrator filing fee $200.00/Each General Services Miscellaneous City Hall Facility Use Cleaning Fee, Additional - $40.00 per Hour. One Hour Minimum Charge General Services Miscellaneous Election Filing Fee $5.00 Golf Course Golf Course Cart Rental Daily $32.00 Golf Course Cart Rental Daily $40.00 Golf Course Cart Rental Senior, Non-Primetime $22.00 Golf Course Cart Rental Senior, Non-Primetime $30.00 Golf Course Cart Rental Twilight $30.00 Golf Course Facility Rental 1/2 Banquet Room $1,000.00 Golf Course Facility Rental Main Banquet Room $1,500.00 Golf Course Facility Rental Wedding Rental $4,500.00 Golf Course Facility Rental Wedding Rental & Ceremony $6,000.00 Golf Course Food Minimum Main Banquet Room $2,500.00 Golf Course Food Minimum Main Banquet Room- Wedding $4,500.00 Golf Course Food Minimum Partial Rooms $1,500.00 Golf Course Greens Fee (Juniors) 18 Hole, After 1 PM $25.00 Golf Course Greens Fee (Juniors) 2 Hours Before Dark $10.00 Golf Course Greens Fee (Juniors) 9 Hole, After 1 PM $20.00 Golf Course Greens Fee (Non-Patron) 18 Hole, Friday - Sunday & Holiday $47.00 Golf Course Greens Fee (Non-Patron) 18 Hole, Monday - Thursday $42.00 Golf Course Greens Fee (Non-Patron) 9 Hole, Friday - Sunday & Holiday, After 1 PM $28.00 Golf Course Greens Fee (Non-Patron) 9 Hole, Monday - Thursday $28.00 Golf Course Greens Fee (Patron) 18 Hole, Friday - Sunday & Holiday $44.00 Golf Course Greens Fee (Patron) 18 Hole, Monday - Thursday $39.00 Golf Course Greens Fee (Patron) 9 Hole, Friday - Sunday & Holiday, After 1 PM $26.00 Golf Course Greens Fee (Patron) 9 Hole, Monday - Thursday $26.00 Golf Course Greens Fee (Seniors) 18 Hole, Friday - Sunday & Holiday $38.00 Golf Course Greens Fee (Seniors) 18 Hole, Monday - Thursday $29.00 Golf Course Greens Fee (Seniors) 9 Hole, Friday - Sunday & Holiday, After 1 PM $22.00 Golf Course Greens Fee (Seniors) 9 Hole, Monday - Thursday $21.00 Golf Course Greens Fee (Twilight Golf) Walking $28.00 Golf Course Practice Range Range Balls $8.00 Golf Course Practice Range Range Balls $13.00 Golf Course Practice Range Range Balls $16.00 Golf Course Season Pass Couple $2,700.00 Golf Course Season Pass Couple, Weekday $2,250.00 Golf Course Season Pass Half Cart Pass $800.00 Golf Course Season Pass Half Cart Pass, Senior $650.00 Golf Course Season Pass Individual $1,800.00 1 AB C H 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 Golf Course Season Pass Individual, Weekday $1,500.00 Golf Course Season Pass Junior, Weekday $475.00 Golf Course Season Pass Junior, Weekends After 1 PM $675.00 Golf Course Season Pass Practice Range, Member $450.00 Golf Course Season Pass Practice Range, Non-Member $750.00 Golf Course Season Pass Senior $1,475.00 Golf Course Season Pass Senior, Husband/Wife $2,250.00 Golf Course Season Pass Senior, Husband/Wife, Weekday $1,850.00 Golf Course Season Pass Senior, Weekday $1,250.00 Golf Course Tournament Shotgun, Before May 15 or After Sep 19 $5,500.00 Golf Course Tournament Shotgun, Before May 15 or After Sep 19 $6,500.00 Golf Course Tournament Shotgun, May 16 thru Sep 18 $7,500.00 Golf Course Tournament Shotgun, May 16 thru Sep 18 $8,500.00 Golf Course Ride Along Fee Ride Along Fee $12.00 Golf Course Trail Fee Trail Fee Current rate Ice Arena Ice Arena High School Hockey Games Double - Admission Charged Varsity or JV games - Boys 50/50 Split - $2,000 Minimum per Game Ice Arena High School Hockey Games Double - Admission Charged Varsity or JV games - Girls 50/50 Split - $1,500 Minimum per Game Ice Arena High School Hockey Games Single - Admission Charged Varsity or JV games - Boys 50/50 Split - $1,500 Minimum per Game Ice Arena High School Hockey Games Single - Admission Charged Varsity or JV games - Girls 50/50 Split - $1,200 Minimum per Game Ice Arena North & West Rink Ice Rental 72 Hour Deal $175.00 Plus Tax Ice Arena North & West Rink Ice Rental Monday - Friday $245.00 Plus Tax Ice Arena North & West Rink Ice Rental Monday - Friday $175.00 Plus Tax Ice Arena North & West Rink Ice Rental Off Season (April 1 – August 31)$190.00 Plus Tax Ice Arena North & West Rink Ice Rental Off Season (April 1 – August 31)$180.00 Plus Tax Ice Arena North & West Rink Ice Rental Off Season (April 1 – August 31)$170.00 Plus Tax Ice Arena North & West Rink Ice Rental Off Season (April 1 – August 31)$165.00 Plus Tax Ice Arena North & West Rink Ice Rental Off Season (April 1 – August 31)$160.00 Plus Tax Ice Arena North & West Rink Ice Rental Off Season (April 1 – August 31)$175.00 Plus Tax Ice Arena North & West Rink Ice Rental Saturday & Sunday $245.00 Plus Tax Ice Arena North & West Rink Ice Rental Saturday & Sunday $175.00 Plus Tax Ice Arena Public Skating Figure Skaters Practice - North or West Rink $14.00 Per Person Ice Arena Public Skating Figure Skaters Practice - South Rink $7.00 Per Person Ice Arena Public Skating Open Hockey $7.00 Per Person Ice Arena Public Skating Public Skating $7.00 Per Person Ice Arena Public Skating Public Skating Punch Card $49.00 Each Ice Arena Rentals, Other Ice Resurfacing, Extra $25.00 Ice Arena Rentals, Other Marquee Sign $10.00 Per Day Per Side Ice Arena Rentals, Other Meeting Room $30.00 Per Hour Ice Arena Rentals, Other Skate Rental $7.00 Per Pair Ice Arena Rentals, Other Skate Sharpening $7.00 Per Pair Ice Arena Rentals, Other Skate Sharpening Punch Card $49.00/ 8 Sharpening's Ice Arena South Rink Ice Rental 72 Hour Deal $135.00 Plus Tax Ice Arena South Rink Ice Rental Monday - Friday $145.00 Plus Tax Ice Arena South Rink Ice Rental Monday - Friday $135.00 Plus Tax Ice Arena South Rink Ice Rental Off Season (April 1 – August 31)$145.00 Plus Tax Ice Arena South Rink Ice Rental Off Season (April 1 – August 31)$135.00 Plus Tax Ice Arena South Rink Ice Rental Saturday & Sunday $145.00 Plus Tax Ice Arena South Rink Ice Rental Saturday & Sunday $135.00 Plus Tax Ice Arena Turf Rental March - September $100.00 Plus Tax Licenses Licenses Business Adult Entertainment, Principal Uses $5,000.00 Plus Investigation Fee of $2,060.00 In-State; up to $10,300.00 Out-Of-State Licenses Business Beekeeping $100.00 Every 2 Years Licenses Business Chicken and Duck Keeping $100.00 Every 2 Years Licenses Business Fireworks Sales, Retail (Accessory Seller)$100.00 Licenses Business Fireworks Sales, Retail (Principal Seller)$350.00 Licenses Business Gambling, Investigation Fee (Premises Permits and Bingo Halls) $250.00 1 AB C H 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 Licenses Business Gambling, Permit and State Licensing Exemptions $100.00 Licenses Business Liquor, 3.2% Malt Liquor, Investigation Fee $250.00 (Except Temporary Licenses) Licenses Business Liquor, 3.2% Malt Liquor, Off Sale $200.00 Per Calendar Year Licenses Business Liquor, 3.2% Malt Liquor, Off Sale, Brew Pub $200.00 Per Calendar Year Licenses Business Liquor, 3.2% Malt Liquor, Off Sale, Small Brewer $200.00 Per Calendar Year Licenses Business Liquor, 3.2% Malt Liquor, On Sale $600.00 Per Calendar Year Licenses Business Liquor, 3.2% Malt Liquor, On Sale, Club $100.00 Per Calendar Year Licenses Business Liquor, 3.2% Malt Liquor, On Sale, Temporary $50.00/Day For Each Location Licenses Business Liquor, Consumption & Display $300.00 Per Calendar Year Licenses Business Liquor, Consumption & Display, Temporary $25.00 Per Day Licenses Business Liquor, Intoxicating, Investigation Fee $500.00 Licenses Business Liquor, Intoxicating, Investigation Fee $200.00 Licenses Business Liquor, Intoxicating, Investigation Fee Actual Cost Licenses Business Liquor, Intoxicating, Off Sale $200.00 Per Calendar Year Licenses Business Liquor, Intoxicating, Off Sale, Brew Pub Malt Liquor $500.00 Per Calendar Year Licenses Business Liquor, Intoxicating, Off Sale, Micro distillery $200.00 Per Calendar Year Licenses Business Liquor, Intoxicating, Off Sale, Small Brewer Malt Liquor $200.00 Per Calendar Year Licenses Business Liquor, Intoxicating, Off Sale, Wine, Temporary $50.00 Per Day for Each Location Licenses Business Liquor, Intoxicating, On Sale $6,000.00 Per Calendar Year Licenses Business Liquor, Intoxicating, On Sale, Community Festival, Temporary $50.00 Per Day for Each Location Licenses Business Liquor, Intoxicating, On Sale, Brew Pub $500.00 Per Calendar Year Licenses Business Liquor, Intoxicating, On Sale, Brewer Taproom $750.00 Per Calendar Year Licenses Business Liquor, Intoxicating, On Sale, Club $300.00 Per Calendar Year Licenses Business Liquor, Intoxicating, On Sale, Club $500.00 Per Calendar Year Licenses Business Liquor, Intoxicating, On Sale, Club $650.00 Per Calendar Year Licenses Business Liquor, Intoxicating, On Sale, Club $800.00 Per Calendar Year Licenses Business Liquor, Intoxicating, On Sale, Club $1,000.00 Per Calendar Year Licenses Business Liquor, Intoxicating, On Sale, Club $2,000.00 Per Calendar Year Licenses Business Liquor, Intoxicating, On Sale, Club $3,000.00 Per Calendar Year Licenses Business Liquor, Intoxicating, On Sale, Culinary Class $750.00 Per Calendar Year Licenses Business Liquor, Intoxicating, On Sale, Micro distillery Cocktail Room $750.00 Per Calendar Year Licenses Business Liquor, Intoxicating, On Sale, Micro distillery, Temporary $50.00 Per Day for Each Location Licenses Business Liquor, Intoxicating, On Sale, Sports Facility or Cultural Facility, Temporary $50.00 Per Day for Each Location Licenses Business Liquor, Intoxicating, On Sale, Temporary $50.00 Per Day for Each Location Licenses Business Liquor, Intoxicating, On Sale, Wine $2,000.00 Per Calendar Year Licenses Business Liquor, Intoxicating, On Sale, Wine Festival, Temporary $50.00 Per Day for Each Location Licenses Business Liquor, Intoxicating, Sunday $200.00 Per Calendar Year Licenses Business Reapplication Fee following Revocation by the Council Double the Current License Fee Licenses Business Massage Business $100.00 Per Calendar Year; $100.00 Initial Investigation Fee Licenses Business Massage Therapist $50.00 Per Calendar Year; $50.00 Initial Investigation Fee Licenses Business Mobile Food Unit Operator License $50/Day or $250/Year Licenses Business Pawnbroker $1,030.00 Per Calendar Year; $530.00 Investigation Fee Licenses Business Peddler/Transient Merchant $105.00 Per Calendar Year/License Period Licenses Business Secondhand Goods Dealer, Single or Multiple $1,030.00 Per Calendar Year; $530.00 Investigation Fee Licenses Business Solid Waste and Recycling Collector, Commercial $365.00 per Calendar Year Licenses Business Solid Waste and Recycling Collector, Residential $570.00 Per Calendar Year Licenses Business Special Event Permit $100.00 Licenses Business Lower-Potency Hemp Edible Retailer Initial Registration (1 License Per Retail Location) (Registration Fee Plus First Renewal Fee) $250.00 Licenses Business Lower-Potency Hemp Edible Retailer Renewal Fee (Per Retail Location)$125.00 Licenses Business Medical Cannabis Combination Initial Registration (Registration Fee Plus First Renewal Fee)$1,500.00 Licenses Business Medical Cannabis Combination (Renewal Fee) $1,000.00 Licenses Business Cannabis Event Organizer Permit (Event Fee and Escrow) (One Event)250.00 Each Event with a $5000.00 Escrow Licenses Business Micro Initial Registration (Registration Fee Plus First Renewal Fee) $1,000.00 Licenses Business Micro (Renewal Fee)$1,000.00 Licenses Business Mezzo Initial Registration (Registration Fee Plus First Renewal Fee) $1,500.00 Licenses Business Mezzo (Renewal Fee)$1,000.00 Licenses Business Cannabis Cultivator (Registration Fee plus first Renewal Fee) $1,500.00 Licenses Business Cannabis Cultivator (Renewal Fee)$1,000.00 Licenses Business Cannabis Manufacturer (Registration Fee plus first Renewal Fee) $1,500.00 Licenses Business Cannabis Manufacturer (Renewal Fee)$1,000.00 Licenses Business Cannabis Retailer (Registration Fee plus first Renewal Fee) $1,500.00 Licenses Business Cannabis Retailer (Renewal Fee)$1,000.00 Licenses Business Cannabis Wholesaler (Registration Fee Plus First Renewal Fee) $1,500.00 Licenses Business Cannabis Wholesaler (Renewal Fee)$1,000.00 Licenses Business Cannabis Transporter (Registration Fee Plus First Renewal Fee) $750.00 Licenses Business Cannabis Transporter (Renewal Fee)$500.00 Licenses Business Cannabis Testing Facility (Registration Fee Plus First Renewal Fee) $1,500.00 1 AB C H 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 Licenses Business Cannabis Testing Facility (Renewal Fee)$1,000.00 Licenses Business Cannabis Delivery Service (Registration Fee Plus First Renewal Fee) $750.00 Licenses Business Cannabis Delivery Service (Renewal Fee)$500.00 Licenses Business Lower-Potency Hemp Edible Manufacturer (Registration Fee Plus First Renewal Fee)$1,000.00 Licenses Business Lower-Potency Hemp Edible Manufacturer (Renewal Fee) $500.00 Licenses Business Tobacco Sales, Retail $250.00 Per Calendar Year Licenses Rental Rental Dwelling, Late Fee $50.00 Licenses Rental Rental Dwelling, Multiple Family $175 Per Building Plus $20 Per Unit - Annually Licenses Rental Rental Dwelling, Reinspection Fee $60.00 Licenses Rental Rental Dwelling, Single/Duplex/Twin $250 Per Unit - Biennially Parks Parks Event/Tournament Class 2 $0.00 Parks Event/Tournament Class 3 $325.00 Parks Event/Tournament Class 4 $540.00 Parks Event/Tournament Class 5 $695.00 Parks Event/Tournament Concession Fee $55.00 Parks Event/Tournament Event Staff TBD Parks Event/Tournament Field Chalk As Quoted by Parks Division Parks Facility Use Outdoor Ballfields (2 Hour Minimum) $26.00/Hour (Resident); $36.00/Hour (Non-Resident) Parks Facility Use Outdoor Court (2 Hour Minimum) $11.00/Hour (Resident); $16.00/Hour (Non-Resident) Parks Facility Use Outdoor Rink Rental $60.00/Hour (Resident); $75.00/Hour (Non-Resident) Parks Facility Use Park Building $191.00/Day (Resident): $258.00/Day (Non-Resident) Parks Facility Use Park Building: Glacial Valley Park $464.00/Day (Resident): $567.00/day (Non-Resident) Parks Facility Use Pavilion, Shelter $77.00/Day (Resident); $103.00/Day (Non-Resident) Parks Facility Use Tent/Bounce House Location Marking $50.00/Marked Location Parks Donation Memorial Bench $2,000.00 Parks Donation Picnic Table $1,250.00 Parks Donation Tree $400.00/ or Price of the Tree Permits Permits Building City Contractor Licensing (Excluding Mechanical and Sign Contractor who hold a State License or Bond)$60 Annual Permits Building Building Permit Fee Table (All New Residential & Commercial Construction, Finishing, Alterations, Remodeling, Additions, Commercial Driveway/Parking Areas, and Swimming Pools Greater than 18 Inches Deep) $116 Minimum (Residential) and $158 Minimum (Commercial) Permits Building Building Permit Renewal Fee 1/2 of the Original Permit Fee 180 Days From Issuance Date or 180 Days From Last Inspection Date Permits Building Commercial Certificate of Occupancy $61.00 Permits Building Construction and Utility Permits 3% of Construction Cost ($150.00 Minimum) Permits Building Contractor License per permit $5.00 License Look-up for Contractors with Licenses at the State Permits Building Decks (New)$182.00 Permits Building Decks (Remodel - Railing/Stairs Non Structural) $121.00 Permits Building Driveways, Residential $90.00 Permits Building Investigative Fee Charge Up To But Not Exceeding Permit Fee Permits Building Kitchen/Bath Remodel $116.00 Permits Building Manufactured Home $116.00 Permits Building Building Plan Review Fee $25.00 Minimum, 68% Maximum of Building Permit Fee Permits Building Pool, Inground, Demolition $121.00 Permits Building Pool/Spa $61.00 Permits Building Pool/Spa $121.00 Permits Building Building Permit based on Project Valuation $500 - $2,000: $33.00 Base Fee for the first $500 Project Valuation; $5.00 per additional $100 Project Valuation $2,001 - $25,000: $94.00 Base Fee for first $2,000 Project Valuation; $18.00 per additional $1,000 Project Valuation $25,001 - $50,000: $518.00 Base Fee for first $25,000 Project Valuation; $13.00 per additional $1,000 Project Valuation $50,001 - $100,000: $849.00 Base Fee for first $50,000 Project Valuation; $9.00 per additional $1,000 Project Valuation $100,001 - $500,000: $1,317.00 Base Fee for first $100,000 Project Valuation; $8.00 per additional $1,000 Project Valuation $500,001 - $1,000,000: $4,267.00 Base Fee for first $500,000 Project Valuation; $7.00 per additional $1,000 Project Valuation $1,000,00 or Greater: $7,828.00 Base Fee for first $1,000,001 Project Valuation; $6.00 per additional $1,000 Project Valuation Permits Building Residential Temporary Certificate of Occupancy $8,000.00 Escrow 1 AB C H 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 Permits Building Roofing (Commercial)Project Valuation Fee Permits Building Roofing (Residential)$121.00 Permits Building Siding (Residential)$121.00 Permits Building Signs - Temporary No Fee - Permit Application Required to be Filed with the City Permits Building Signs (Pylon/Monument with Footings)$121.00 Permits Building Signs (Wall Mount/Existing Pylon)$90.00 Permits Building Accessory Structures over 200sqft Project Valuation Fee Permits Building Windows/Doors (Existing Openings)$121.00 Permits Building Windows/Doors (Modified Openings)$182.00 Permits Building Wrecking, Moving, Demolition $121.00 Permits Electrical Circuit or Feeder 0 to 200 Amp $12.00/Circuit or Feeder Permits Electrical Circuit or Feeder Over 200 Amp $30.00/Circuit or Feeder Permits Electrical Solar PV Installations for Electrical (1) 0 watts to and including 5,000 watts, $90 or (2) 5,001 watts to and including 10,000 watts, $150 or (3) 10,001 watts to and including 20,000 watts, $225 or (4) 20,001 watts to and including 30,000 watts, $300 or (5) 30,001 watts to and including 40,000 watts, $375 or (6) 40,001 watts to and including 1,000,000 watts, $375 and $25 for each additional 10,000 watts over 40,000 watts or (7) 1,000,001 watts to 5,000,000 watts, $3,975 and $15 for each additional 10,000 watts over 1,000,001 watts or (8) 5,000,001 watts and larger, $12,975, and $10 for each additional 10,000 watts over 5,000,001 watts Permits Electrical Existing One or Two Family Dwelling: 0 to 14 Feeders or Circuits are Installed or Extended per Unit $12.00/Feeder or Circuit Permits Electrical Existing One- or Two-Family Dwelling: 15 or More Feeders or Circuits are Installed or Extended per Unit $100.00/Dwelling Unit Permits Electrical Electrical Permit Fee $50.00/Inspection Trip Permits Electrical Electrical Inspection (per trip)$50.00/Inspection Trip Permits Electrical Grounding Electrode, Concrete-Encased (per trip) $50/Inspection Trip Permits Electrical Manufactured Home Park Lot Supply $50/Pedestal Permits Electrical New One- or Two-Family Dwelling: 0 to 25 Circuits and Feeders per Unit $200.00/Dwelling Unit Permits Electrical New One- or Two-Family Dwelling: Additional Circuits over 25 per Unit $8.00/Feeder or Circuit Permits Electrical Panel Changes $100.00/Enclosure Permits Electrical Pools $100.00 Permits Electrical Power Source: 0 to 400 Amp (0 to 250 Volts) $70.00/Source Permits Electrical Power Source: 401 to 800 Amp (0 to 250 Volts) $140.00/Source Permits Electrical Power Source: Over 800 Amp (0 to 250 Volts) $200.00/Source Permits Electrical Power Source: 0 to 400 Amp (Over 250 Volts) $100.00/Source Permits Electrical Power Source: 401 to 800 Amp (Over 250 Volts) $200.00/Source Permits Electrical Power Source: Over 800 Amp (Over 250 Volts) $300.00/Source Permits Electrical Reconnected Existing Circuit or Feeder (Panel Replacement) $100.00/Enclosure Permits Electrical Retrofitting of Existing Lighting Fixtures $1.00/Fixture Permits Electrical RV Pedestals (All Circuits Originating in Pedestal Including Factory Circuits)$8.00/Circuit Permits Electrical Separate Bonding Inspection $50.00/Inspection fee Permits Electrical State Surcharge $1.00 Permits Electrical Street, Parking, and Outdoor Lighting Standards $5.00/Standard Permits Electrical Technology Circuits and Circuits Less than 50 Volts $1.00/Device or Apparatus Permits Electrical Traffic Signals $5.00 Each Permits Electrical Transformers for Electronic Power Supplies, Signs, and Outline Lighting $5.50 Each Permits Electrical Transformers for Light, Heat, and Power: 0 to 10 KVA $20.00 Each Permits Electrical Transformers for Light, Heat, and Power: More than 10 KVA $40.00 Each Permits Grading/Excavation Grading As-built Survey Certification $39.00 Permits Grading/Excavation Permit - (0 - 50 Cubic Yards)$26.00 Permits Grading/Excavation Permit - (1,001 - 10,000 Cubic Yards) $211.00 Base Fee + $16.00 Per 1,000 Cubic Yards Permits Grading/Excavation Permit - (10,001 - 100,000 Cubic Yards) $355.00 Base Fee + $71.00 Per 10,000 Cubic Yards Permits Grading/Excavation Permit - (100,001 - or more Cubic Yards) $994.00 Base Fee + $39.00 Per 10,000 Cubic Yards Permits Grading/Excavation Permit - (101 - 1,000 Cubic Yards) $40.00 Base Fee + $19.00 Per 100 Cubic Yards Permits Grading/Excavation Permit - (51 - 100 Cubic Yards)$40.00 Permits Grading/Excavation Plan Review (0-50 Cubic Yards)No Fee Permits Grading/Excavation Plan Review (1,001 - 10,000 Cubic Yards)$53.00 Permits Grading/Excavation Plan Review (10,001 - 100,000 Cubic Yards) $53.00 Base Fee + $26.00 per 10,000 Cubic Yards 1 AB C H 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 Permits Grading/Excavation Plan Review (100,001 - 200,000 Cubic Yards) $287.00 Base Fee + $14.00 per 10,000 Cubic Yards Permits Grading/Excavation Plan Review (101-1,000 Cubic Yards)$40.00 Permits Grading/Excavation Plan Review (200,001 or more Cubic Yards) $427.00 Base Fee + $7.75 per 10,000 Cubic Yards Permits Grading/Excavation Plan Review (51 - 100 Cubic Yards)$26.00 Permits Grading/Excavation Site Grading Inspection Fee $66.00 Permits Inspections Curb Box Inspection $170.00 Permits Inspections Erosion Control Inspection (Residential Lot Not Covered by Development Agreement)$825.00 Permits Inspections Inspections For Which No Fee Is Specifically Indicated $58.00 per Hour Minimum 1-Hour Fee Permits Inspections Inspections Outside Normal Business Hours $110.00 Minimum Permits Inspections Reinspection Fee $61.00 Maximum Per Site/Project Visit Permits Inspections Boulevard Tree/Sod Inspection $165.00 Permits Fire Alarm Note: Add State Surcharge Fire Alarm 2% of Construction Value, $158 Minimum Permits Fire Suppression Note: Add State Surcharge Fire Suppression 2% of Construction Value, $158 Minimum Permits Plant Registration Plant Registration .01 Cents/Square Foot Permits Mechanical/Plumbing (Commercial) Note: Add State Surcharge Mechanical 2% of Contract Price, $158 Minimum Permits Mechanical/Plumbing (Commercial) Note: Add State Surcharge Plumbing, Domestic 2% of Contract Price, $158 Minimum Permits Mechanical/Plumbing (Commercial) Note: Add State Surcharge Plumbing, Irrigation 2% of Contract price, $158 Minimum Permits Mechanical/Plumbing (Commercial) Note: Add State Surcharge Sewer Line $168.00 Permits Mechanical/Plumbing (Commercial) Note: Add State Surcharge Water Line $168.00 Permits Mechanical/Plumbing (Residential) Note: Add State Surcharge Mechanical/Plumbing Permit Fees (Residential): Addition/Alteration/Remodel $61.00 Base Fee (Includes 1 Fixture) Plus $12.00 Each Additional Fixture ($231 Maximum Permit Fee) Permits Mechanical/Plumbing (Residential) Note: Add State Surcharge New Home $231.00 Permits Miscellaneous Permit Fees Building Inspection Card Replacement $42.00 Permits State Surcharges, Building/Mechanical/Plumbing Permits State Surcharges based on Project Valuation (1) $1,000,000 or less; $0.00 Base Fee + .0005 x valuation or (2) $1,000,001 - $2,000,000; $525 Base Fee + .0004 x valuation - $1,000,000 or (3) $2,000,001 - $3,000,000; $950 Base Fee + .0003 x valuation - $2,000,000 or (4) $3,000,001 - $4,000,000; $1,250 Base Fee + .0002 x valuation - $3,000,000 or (5) $4,000,001 - $5,000,000; $1,450 Base Fee + .0001 x valuation - $4,000,000 or (6) Greater than $5,000,001; $1,550 Base Fee + .00005 x valuation - $5,000,000 Permits State Surcharges, Building/Mechanical/Plumbing Permits State Surcharge based on Fixed Fees $1.00 Permits Zoning Patios and Parking Areas, Residential $61.00/One Inspection Permits Zoning Accessory Structures under 200sqft $61.00/One Inspection Public Safety Public Safety Data Requests Data Requests, Other Determined by Actual Production Cost Public Safety Data Requests Photographs $20.00 (JPG Format on CD) Public Safety Data Requests Police/Fire Reports $0.25 Per Page Over 25 Pages Public Safety Data Requests Recordings, Audio $20.00 (CD/DVD) Public Safety Data Requests Recordings, Squad Video (L3)$20.00 (DVD) Public Safety Data Requests Recordings, Video $20.00 (DVD) 1 AB C H 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 Public Safety Data Requests Transcription of Audio Recording Determined by Actual Time at Current Transcription Rate Public Safety Fire Services Burning Permit, Commercial $50.00 Public Safety Fire Services Day Care Facility Inspection $50.00 Public Safety Fire Services Fire Equipment Use All Fire Equipment Use Based on Current FEMA Rates Public Safety Fire Services Fire Permit 1st Permit $20.00 per Year; Each Additional Permit $5.00 Public Safety Fire Services Hazardous Materials and Other Charges for Service $150.00 Per Hour Per Person Plus Materials. Minimum Charge of 4 Hours. Public Safety Fire Services Tank Installation Permit 1% of Value ($100.00 Minimum) Public Safety Fire Services Title III Facility Inspection $50.00 Public Safety Police Services Blood Alcohol Test $100.00 Public Safety Police Services Clearance Letters (i.e. Adoption, Passport, Etc.)$20.00 Public Safety Police Services Daycare Checks $20.00 Per Adult Public Safety Police Services Excessive Use of Police Services (1 to 2 nuisance service call(s) within 12 months)No Charge Public Safety Police Services Excessive Use of Police Services (3rd nuisance service call within 12 months)$200.00 Public Safety Police Services Excessive Use of Police Services (4th nuisance service call within 12 months)$400.00 Public Safety Police Services Excessive Use of Police Services (5th nuisance service call within 12 months)$800.00 Public Safety Police Services Excessive Use of Police Services (6th nuisance service call within 12 months)$1,600.00 Public Safety Police Services Excessive Use of Police Services (7th nuisance service call within 12 months and all subsequent nuisance calls)$2,000.00 Public Safety Police Services Fingerprinting (Resident)$25.00 Public Safety Police Services Fingerprinting (Non-resident)$35.00 Public Safety Police Services Law Enforcement, Police Officer $130.00 Per Hour Public Safety Police Services Lockouts, Car Door Unlocking $35.00 Per Event Public Safety Police Services Special Response Team (Outside Of Washington County) Per Current Mutual Aid Agreement Public Safety Towing and Impound Administrative Fee $65.00 Public Safety Towing and Impound Impound, Storage Fee $10.00 Per Day for First 30 Days/$30.00 Per Month Thereafter Public Safety Towing and Impound Towing Fee Per Current Towing Contract Public Safety Towing and Impound Towing/Storage Charge Per Current Towing Contract Public Safety Towing and Impound Vehicle Impoundment Per Current Towing Contract Public Works Public Works Equipment Air Compressor $43.00 Public Works Equipment Asphalt Roller $37.00 Public Works Equipment Backhoe $86.00 Public Works Equipment Blower $22.00 Public Works Equipment Brush Saw $22.00 Public Works Equipment Chainsaw $22.00 Public Works Equipment Chipper $65.00 Public Works Equipment Grader $118.00 Public Works Equipment Hotsy $32.00 Public Works Equipment Hydro Mulcher (Additional Charges for Product Used) $80.00 Public Works Equipment Loader, 3-Yard $99.00 Public Works Equipment Loader, Skid steer $69.00 Public Works Equipment Mower $43.00 Public Works Equipment and Labor Operator, Equipment, Overtime Rate $95.00/Hour Public Works Equipment and Labor Operator, Equipment, Standard Rate $67.00/Hour Public Works Equipment Paint Striper $48.00 Public Works Equipment Patch Truck $118.00 Public Works Equipment Paver, Pull Type $43.00 Public Works Equipment Paver, Track Type $204.00 Public Works Equipment Power Broom $22.00 Public Works Equipment Sewer Vac (Requires 2 Operators)$194.00 Public Works Equipment Sign Truck $53.00 Public Works Equipment Snowblower $22.00 Public Works Equipment Spray Patcher $91.00 Public Works Equipment Sweeper $108.00 Public Works Equipment Tar Kettle $22.00 Public Works Equipment Tractor with Clam $58.00 Public Works Equipment Tractor, Holder, with Mower $64.00 1 AB C H 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 Public Works Equipment Tractor, Large, with Mower $64.00 Public Works Equipment Tractor, Small, with Mower $48.00 Public Works Equipment Traffic Counter $12.00 Public Works Equipment Trailer $16.00 Public Works Equipment Trailer, Arrow Board $27.00 Public Works Equipment Trailer, Jetter $75.60 Public Works Equipment Trailer, Tandem Axel $27.00 Public Works Equipment Trencher $53.00 Public Works Equipment Truck, Bucket $108.00 Public Works Equipment Truck, Dump, 1-Ton $53.00 Public Works Equipment Truck, Dump, Single Axle $58.00 Public Works Equipment Truck, Dump, Single Axle with Plow/Attachment $91.00 Public Works Equipment Truck, Dump, Tandem Axle $91.00 Public Works Equipment Truck, Dump, Tandem Axle with Plow/Attachment $96.00 Public Works Equipment Truck, Pickup $46.00 Public Works Equipment Truck, Pickup with Plow/Attachment $58.00 Public Works Equipment Truck, Tanker $80.00 Public Works Equipment Wacker $18.00 Public Works Right-of-Way Curb Cuts - Residential $50.00 Public Works Right-of-Way Load Limit Permit $72.00 Each Trip Public Works Right-of-Way Right-of-Way Delay Penalty Fee $80.00 (up to 3 Days) + $16.00/Day (After 3 Days) Public Works Right-of-Way Right-of-Way Excavation Permit Fee: Hole $225.00 Public Works Right-of-Way Right-of-Way Excavation Permit Fee: Trench or Bore $75.00/100 Lineal Feet + Hole Fee ($225.00) Public Works Right-of-Way Right-of-Way Non-excavation Fee, Aerial or Overhead Lines $53.00 Plus $5.25 per 100 Linear Feet Public Works Right-of-Way Right-of-Way Obstruction Permit Fee $225.00 + $0.21/Lineal Foot of Obstruction Public Works Right-of-Way Right-of-Way Permit Extension Fee $75.00 Public Works Right-of-Way Right-of-Way Registration Fee $105.00 Annually Public Works Right-of-Way Right-of-Way Sidewalk, Apron, Commercial $225.00 Public Works Right-of-Way Small Wireless Facility Installation (6 to 15 Facilities)$104.00 Per Facility Public Works Right-of-Way Small Wireless Facility Installation (up to 5 facilities) $520.00 Public Works Right-of-Way Small Wireless Facility Installation, Plan Review Escrow $10,000.00 (Unused Escrow Amount Returned) Public Works Right-of-Way Small Wireless Facility, Collocation Rental $182.00 Per Facility Per Year ($156.00 Rental/$26.00 Maintenance) Public Works Right-of-Way Work Without a Permit Double Permit Fee Public Works Signs 10' Galvanized Round Post $32.00 Public Works Signs 10' Galvanized Square Post $48.00 Public Works Signs 12' Galvanized Round Post $32.00 Public Works Signs 3" X 60" Post Delineators $32.00 Public Works Signs 6'3# Green Channel Post $22.00 Public Works Signs 7'2# Galvanized Channel Post $22.00 Public Works Signs 7'3# Galvanized Channel Post $32.00 Public Works Signs 8'2# Green Channel Post $32.00 Public Works Signs 9 Button Marker $32.00 Public Works Signs Band-It Hardware Average $22.00 Public Works Signs Crosswalk Arrow $43.00 Public Works Signs Crosswalk Sign $96.00 Public Works Signs Heavy Duty Cap Bracket 12"$22.00 Public Works Signs Heavy Duty T Bracket 12"$22.00 Public Works Signs Island Keep Right Sign $48.00 Public Works Signs Light Pole Bracket $27.00 Public Works Signs Marker Band $16.00 Public Works Signs No Parking Sign $27.00 Public Works Signs Nuts and Bolts Per Sign $10.00 Public Works Signs Speed Limit Sign 24" X 30"$43.00 Public Works Signs Square Surface Mount Bracket Break Away $166.00 Public Works Signs Stop Sign - 30" Visual Impact Perception $86.00 1 AB C H 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 Public Works Signs Stop Sign - 36" Visual Impact Perception $113.00 Public Works Signs Street Name Sign - 24" Visual Impact Perception $101.00 Public Works Signs Street Name Sign - 28" Visual Impact Perception $101.00 Public Works Signs Street Name Sign - 30" Visual Impact Perception $108.00 Public Works Signs Street Name Sign - 34" Visual Impact Perception $113.00 Public Works Signs Street Name Sign - 36" Visual Impact Perception $118.00 Public Works Signs Street Name Sign - 42" Visual Impact Perception $129.00 Public Works Signs Street Name Sign 48" Visual Impact Perception $134.00 Public Works Signs Warning Sign - 30" Visual Impact Perception $86.00 Public Works Signs Warning Sign - 36" Visual Impact Perception $118.00 Public Works Spring Clean up Grill $15.00 Public Works Spring Clean up Push mower $15.00 Public Works Spring Cleanup Air Conditioner $10.00 Public Works Spring Cleanup Appliances, Ammonia Refrigerant $100.00 and Up Public Works Spring Cleanup Bulbs, Fluorescent No Charge Public Works Spring Cleanup By Load (Car Trunk)$30.00 - $70.00 Public Works Spring Cleanup By Load (Pickup Truck)$70.00 - $170.00 Public Works Spring Cleanup By Load (SUV/Station Wagon)$40.00 - $90.00 Public Works Spring Cleanup By Load Box Truck $90.00 + Public Works Spring Cleanup Car Battery No Charge Public Works Spring Cleanup Chair $10.00 Public Works Spring Cleanup Computers No Charge Public Works Spring Cleanup Dishwasher $10.00 Public Works Spring Cleanup Electronics No Charge Public Works Spring Cleanup Exercise Equipment $15.00 Public Works Spring Cleanup Freezer $10.00 Public Works Spring Cleanup Lumber, Railroad Tie, 6X6 or 6X8 $10.00 Public Works Spring Cleanup Lumber, Treated, 2X4 $5.00 Public Works Spring Cleanup Lumber, Treated, 4X4 $8.00 Public Works Spring Cleanup Mattress or Box Spring $20.00 Public Works Spring Cleanup Mattress, Crib $10.00 Public Works Spring Cleanup Microwave No Charge Public Works Spring Cleanup Paint, Household, Latex or Oil Based No Charge Public Works Spring Cleanup Refrigerator (No Gas Ammonia)$10.00 Public Works Spring Cleanup Snow Blower $25.00 Public Works Spring Cleanup Sofa $15.00 Public Works Spring Cleanup Stove $10.00 Public Works Spring Cleanup Television No Charge Public Works Spring Cleanup Tire, Car/Light Truck $5.00 Each Public Works Spring Cleanup Tire, Semi Truck $15.00 Each Public Works Spring Cleanup Tire, Tractor $35.00 Each Public Works Spring Cleanup Washer or Dryer $10.00 Each Public Works Spring Cleanup Water Heater $10.00 Each Public Works Spring Cleanup Water Softener $10.00 Each Public Works Street Lights Fixture, Cobra Head, LED $1,468.50 Each or Current Cost Public Works Street Lights Fixture, Concrete, LED $2,964.50 Each or Current Cost Public Works Street Lights Fixture, Granville, LED $1,864.50 Each or Current Cost Public Works Street Lights Fixture, Residential, LED $1,978.90 Each or Current Cost Public Works Street Lights Mast Arm, Pole $907.50 Each or Current Cost Public Works Street Lights Mast Arm, Pole, Dual $907.50 Each or Current Cost Public Works Street Lights Pole, Commercial, Round Tapered - 20' $2,420.00 Each or Current Cost Public Works Street Lights Pole, Commercial, Round Tapered - 30' $4,000 Each or Current Cost Public Works Street Lights Pole, Commercial Round- 30' $3,000 Each or Current Cost Public Works Street Lights Pole, Concrete $4,235.00 Each or Current Cost Public Works Street Lights Pole, Decorative, 14'$2,524.50 Each or Current Cost Public Works Street Lights Pole, Decorative, 18'$3,245.00 Each or Current Cost 1 AB C H 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 Public Works Street Lights Pole, Residential $1,622.50 Each or Current Cost Public Works Street Lights Pole, Decorative Site Link 30' $5,400.00 Each or Current Cost Public Works Street Lights LED Luminaire $2,200 Each or Current Cost Public Works Street Lights Mast Arm $1,400 Each or Current Cost Utilities Utilities Permits/Rentals 2½" Hydrant Water Meter, Deposit $1,500.00 (Actual Cost of Meter) Utilities Permits/Rentals 2½" Hydrant Water Meter, Permit Fee $75.00 Utilities Permits/Rentals 2½" Hydrant Water Meter, Rental Fee $5.00 Per Day Utilities Permits/Rentals 2½" Meter, Consumption Charge $5.00 per 1,000 Gallons Consumption Utilities Permits/Rentals 3/4" Adapter, Consumption Charge $5.00 per 1,000 Gallons Consumption Utilities Permits/Rentals 3/4" Adapter, Deposit $300.00 Utilities Permits/Rentals 3/4" Adapter, Permit Fee $75.00 Utilities Permits/Rentals 3/4" Adapter, Rental Fee $5.00 Per Day Utilities Permits/Rentals Fire Hydrant Hookup Permit $50.00 Utilities Services Accuracy Test of Water Meter (Requested by Water User) Outsource Meter Accuracy Certification $157.50 Utilities Services Utility Account Turn-off Fee $78.75 Utilities Services Water and Sewer Restoration Fee $5.00 Plus 6% Interest Per Annum Utilities Services Water Reconnection or Turn-on Fee (Outside Water Department Regular Working Hours) $109.00 Per Occurrence; $190.00 on Holidays Utilities Sewer Usage Rates Commercial $5.06 Per Month Utilities Sewer Usage Rates Commercial $4.47 Per 1,000 Gallons Utilities Water Usage Rates Commercial, Usage (Municipal Customer) 6% Over Commercial Rate Utilities Sewer Usage Rates Residential $5.06 Per Month Utilities Sewer Usage Rates Residential $4.47 Per 1,000 Gallons Utilities Stormwater Utility Fees 1.5+ Acre Residential $4.79 per Residential Unit Per Month Utilities Stormwater Utility Fees Agricultural Land with Structure $72.39 Per Parcel With Structure Per Year Utilities Stormwater Utility Fees Apartments $1.51 Per Residential unit Per Month Utilities Stormwater Utility Fees Cemeteries $11.42 Per Acre Per Year Utilities Stormwater Utility Fees Churches $25.10 Per Impervious Surface Acre Per Month Utilities Stormwater Utility Fees Commercial / Industrial $25.10 Per Impervious Surface Acre Per Month Utilities Stormwater Utility Fees Golf Courses $11.42 Per Acre Per Year Utilities Stormwater Utility Fees Mining $11.42 Per Acre Per Year Utilities Stormwater Utility Fees Schools $25.10 Per Impervious Surface Acre Per Month Utilities Stormwater Utility Fees Single Family Home $6.47 Per Residential Unit Per Month Utilities Stormwater Utility Fees Townhomes $3.13 Per Residential Unit Per Month Utilities Street Light Rates City-Owned, Commercial $6.32 Per Month Per Residential Lot Equivalent (2.5 Lots/Acre for Commercial and Churches; 1.25 Lots/Acre For Schools) Utilities Street Light Rates City-Owned, Residential $6.32 Per Month Per Lot Utilities Street Light Rates Rural $6.22 Per Year Utilities Street Light Rates Xcel Owned $7.61 Per Month Utilities Water Meters Angle Valve - Flare Connection (each)$89.00 Utilities Water Meters Angle Valve - Compression Connection (each)$126.00 Utilities Water Meters 5/8-Inch Model 420 $200.00 Plus Sales Tax Utilities Water Meters 3/4-Inch Model 435 $221.00 Plus Sales Tax Utilities Water Meters 2-Inch Compound Actual Cost Plus Sales Tax Utilities Water Meters Flange Kit (1 1/2 inch)$137.00 Plus Sales Tax Utilities Water Meters Flange Kit (2 Inch)$147.00 Plus Sales Tax Utilities Water Meters Flange Kit (3 inch)$357.00 Plus Sales Tax Utilities Water Meters Flange Kit (4 inch)$620.00 Plus Sales Tax Utilities Water Meters Flange Kit (6 inch)$945.00 Plus Sales Tax Utilities Water Meters Mag Meter 3-Inch $4,505.00 Plus Sales Tax Utilities Water Meters Mag Meter 4-Inch $5,924.00 Plus Sales Tax Utilities Water Meters Mag Meter 6-Inch $9,813.00 Plus Sales Tax Utilities Water Meters Meter Nipple $17.00 Plus Sales Tax Utilities Water Meters Shut-off Valve $116.00 Plus Sales Tax Utilities Water Meters Ultra Sonic Meter 1½-Inch $1040.00 Plus Sales Tax 1 AB C H 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 Utilities Water Meters Ultra Sonic Meter 1-Inch $445.00 Plus Sales Tax Utilities Water Meters Ultra Sonic Meter 2-Inch $1,188.00 Plus Sales Tax Utilities Water Meters Ultra Sonic 3-Inch $3,833.00 Plus Sales Tax Utilities Water Meters Ultra Sonic 4-Inch $4,935.00 Plus Sales Tax Utilities Water Meters Ultra Sonic 6-Inch $8151.00 Plus Sales Tax Utilities Water Meters Water Meter Radio Transmitter $173.00 Plus Sales Tax Utilities Water Miscellaneous Driveway Cover $157.00 Utilities Water Usage Rates Residential, Base Charge $3.38 Per Month Utilities Water Usage Rates Residential, Base Charge $2.53 Per Month Utilities Water Usage Rates Residential, Usage $1.17 Per 1,000 Gallons Utilities Water Usage Rates Residential, Usage $1.77 Per 1,000 Gallons Utilities Water Usage Rates Residential, Usage $2.64 Per 1,000 Gallons Utilities Water Usage Rates Residential, Usage $3.97 Per 1,000 Gallons Utilities Water Usage Rates Commercial, Base Charge $3.38 Per Month Utilities Water Usage Rates Commercial, Base Charge $3.38 Per Month Utilities Water Usage Rates Commercial, Base Charge $3.38 Per Month Utilities Water Usage Rates Commercial, Base Charge $13.45 Per Month Utilities Water Usage Rates Commercial, Base Charge $26.90 Per Month Utilities Water Usage Rates Commercial, Base Charge $40.41 Per Month Utilities Water Usage Rates Commercial, Base Charge $47.00 Per Month Utilities Water Usage Rates Commercial, Base Charge $67.15 Per Month Utilities Water Usage Rates Commercial, Base Charge $167.90 Per Month Utilities Water Usage Rates Commercial, Usage (Non-Irrigation) $1.17 Per 1,000 Gallons Utilities Water Usage Rates Commercial, Usage (Non-Irrigation) $1.77 Per 1,000 Gallons Utilities Water Usage Rates Commercial, Usage (Non-Irrigation) $2.64 Per 1,000 Gallons Utilities Water Usage Rates Commercial, Usage (Non-Irrigation) $3.97 Per 1,000 Gallons Utilities Water Usage Rates Commercial, Usage (Irrigation)$1.77 Per 1,000 Gallons Utilities Water Usage Rates Commercial, Usage (Irrigation)$2.65 Per 1,000 Gallons Utilities Water Usage Rates Commercial, Usage (Irrigation)$3.99 Per 1,000 Gallons Utilities Water Usage Rates Commercial, Usage (Irrigation)$5.96 Per 1,000 Gallons Utilities Water Usage Rates Commercial, Usage (Municipal Customer) 6% Over Commercial Rate 1 City Council Action Request 7.L. Meeting Date 3/5/2025 Department Administration Agenda Category Action Item Title Tort Liability Limits Staff Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council not waive the tort cap liability limits. Budget Implication N/A Attachments None 1 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator FROM: Joe Fischbach DATE: March 5, 2025 RE: Tort Liability Limits Discussion Cities that obtain liability insurance coverage from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) must decide annually whether to waive the statutory tort liability limits. State Law limits the amount of tort liability to $500,000 per person or $1,500,000 per occurrence. This is often referred to as the “tort cap.” If the City waives the tort cap but does not purchase excess coverage, then the liability limit paid by LMCIT is $2,000,000 per person or occurrence, since this is LMCIT’s coverage limit. If the City waives the tort cap and purchases excess coverage, then the liability limit is increased to the amount of the excess coverage. Waiving tort cap coverage exposes the City to claims outside of the LMCIT coverage limits and obtaining excess coverage is an additional expense. Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council not waive the tort cap liability limits. Attachments None 1 City Council Action Request 7.M. Meeting Date 3/5/2025 Department Public Works Agenda Category Action Item Title Low Zone Treatment Plant and Utility/Engineering Building Fiber Optic Cable Project - Final Payment Resolution Correction Staff Recommendation Rescind Resolution 2025-017 and adopt Resolution 2025-025 approving the final payment for the Low Zone Water Treatment Plant and Utility/Engineering Building Project to Castrejon Inc. in the amount of $75,168.20. Budget Implication The overall project cost of $201,771.50 is not impacted by this correction. Attachments 1. 1_2025-03-05 LZWTP-UEB Fiber Project Final Payment 2. 2_Final Payment Fiber Project Resolution 2025-03-05 3. 3_LZWTP & UEB Fiber Payment #2 & Final To:Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From:Ryan Burfeind, P.E., Public Works Director Date:February 27, 2025 Re:Low Zone Treatment Plant and Utility/Engineering Building Fiber Optic Cable Project – Final Payment Correction Background An extension of the City’s fiber optic cable has been installed to serve the new City facilities at Ideal Avenue South and 110th Street South. Both the Low Zone Water Treatment Plant and the Utility and Engineering building are served with this fiber optic cable that provides data and telecommunications connectivity. Discussion The Low Zone Treatment Plant and Utility/Engineering Building Project work is completed with a final construction cost of $201,771.50. At the 2/19/2025 City Council meeting, the Council approved the final payment to Castrejon Inc. in the amount of $68,504.70. Staff has since discovered a miscalculation related to the retainage on the project which results in a corrected final payment amount of $75,168.20. The overall project cost of $201,771.50 is not impacted by this issue. Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Rescind resolution 2025-017 and adopt resolution 2025-025 approving the final payment for the Low Zone Water Treatment Plant and Utility/Engineering Building Project to Castrejon Inc. in the amount of $75,168.20. CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2025-025 RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION 2025-017 AND APPROVING THE FINAL PAYMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $75,168.20 TO CASTREJON INC. FOR THE LOW ZONE TREATMENT PLANT AND UTILITY/ENGINEERING BUILDING FIBER OPTIC PROJECT WHEREAS, Resolution 2025-017, was approved by the City Council on 2/19/2025, for the final payment for the Low Zone Treatment Plant and Utility/Engineering Building Fiber Optic Project in the amount of $68,504.70 to Castrejon Inc., however there was an error in the calculation of the final payment; and, WHEREAS, the correct amount for final payment to Castrejon Inc. is $75,168.20. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, that: 1. Resolution 2025-017 is hereby rescinded. 2. $75,168.20 be paid to Castrejon Inc. for the final payment for the Low Zone Treatment Plant and Utility/Engineering Building Fiber Optic Project. Passed this 5th day of March 2025. Myron Bailey, Mayor Attest: Tamara Anderson, City Clerk 100.0%5.00%By: TIM HICKEYDated 2/24/2025Mi-Tech Services, Inc.By: Doug HeiderDated 2/1/2425PROJECT MANAGERBy:DatedOWNER5. Percent project complete (E = D/C X 100)6. Materials in storage not installed (F)7. Subtotal (G = D + F)8. Less Retainage (H = 5.0% X G) 1. Original Contract price (A)2. Net change orders approved to date (B)3. Revised Contract amount (C = A+ B)4. Total value of Work completed to date (D)$0.00$201,771.20$126,603.00$75,168.209. Subtotal (I = G - H)10. Less previous applications for payment11. Amount due this application (K = I - J) (J = I from previous application if applicable)CASTREJON INCCity of Cottage GroveCONTRACTORAPPROVED BY:Payment of the AMOUNT DUE THIS APPLICATION is recommended.Application for Payment No. 1 City of Cottage Grove Project No. 202343for Work Completed Through: Project Name: Low Zone Treatment Plant and Utility/Engineering Bldg. Fiber Optic CCONTRACTOR'S Certification:obligations of CONTRACTOR incurred in connection with work covered by prior Applications for Payment number 1 through 2 inclusive; and (2) title to all materials and incorporated in said Work or otherwiselisted in or covered by this Application for Payment will pass to OWNER at time of payment free and clear of all liens, claims, security interests and encumbrances (except as covered by Bond acceptable to OWNER).$0.00$200,671.20$1,100.00$201,771.20$201,771.20The undersigned CONTRACTOR certifies that (1) all previous progress payments received from OWNER on account of Work done under the Contract referred to above have been applied to discharge in full all$201,771.20Application for Payment00 62 76-1 Date:1-16-25Pay Application Number :2CONTRACTOR'S SCHEDULE FEESITEM ESTIMATED UNIT ESTIMATEDNO. ITEM DESCRIPTIONUNITQUANTITY PRICE TOTAL COST UNITS EXTENSION UNITS EXTENSION UNITS EXTENSION1 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $2,000.00 2,000.00$ $0.00 1.00 $2,000.00 1 $2,000.002 Directional Bore LF 11,600 $12.00 139,200.00$ 2,720.00 $32,640.00 8,880.00 $106,560.00 11600 $139,200.003 PULL FIBER THROUGH NEW DUCT LF 11,600 $1.00 11,600.00$ 11,600.00 $11,600.00 - $0.00 11600 $11,600.004 1.5" HDPE LF 11,200 $0.60 6,720.00$ 2,735.00 $1,641.00 8,465.00 $5,079.00 11200 $6,720.005 1.25" HDPE LF 2,184 $0.55 1,201.20$ 1,134.00 $623.70 1,050.00 $577.50 2184 $1,201.206 1 EA 4" HDPE LF 400 $5.00 2,000.00$ 400.00 $2,000.00 - $0.00 400 $2,000.007 4" HDPE LF 656 $5.00 3,280.00$ (14.00) -$70.00 670.00 $3,350.00 656 $3,280.008 24"X36"X24" HANDHOLE EA 8 $1,610.00 12,880.00$ 2.00 $3,220.00 6.00 $9,660.00 8 $12,880.009 30"X48"X36" SPLIT LID HANDHOLE EA 2 $2,100.00 4,200.00$ $0.00 2.00 $4,200.00 2 $4,200.0010POLY DOME LOCATABLE MARKER POST AND TEST STATION EA 8 $150.00 1,200.00$ $0.00 8.00 $1,200.00 8 $1,200.0011 8' GROUND ROD EA 10 $80.00 800.00$ 2.00 $160.00 8.00 $640.00 10 $800.0012 48F SM FIBER OPTIC CABLE LF 12,500 $0.78 9,750.00$ 12,500.00 $9,750.00 - $0.00 12500 $9,750.0013 SPLICE AND TESTING LS 48 $80.00 3,840.00$ 48.00 $3,840.00 - $0.00 48 $3,840.0014 SITE RESTORATION LS 1 $2,000.00 2,000.00$ 1.00 $2,000.00 - $0.00 1 $2,000.00200,671.20$ $67,404.70 $133,266.50 $200,671.20ITEMNO ITEM DESCRIPTION UNITS QUANTITY PRICE TOTAL COST UNITS EXTENSION UNITS EXTENSION UNITS EXTENSION1 Change Order 1 1 $1,100.00 $1,100.00 1 $1,100.00 $0.00 1 $1,100.00TOTAL CHANGE ORDERS $1,100.00 $1,100.00 $0.00 $1,100.00TOTAL PROJECT 201,771.20$ $68,504.70 $133,266.50 $201,771.20BUDGET TO ACTUAL DETAIL REPORTTOTALPREVIOUS PERIODTHIS PERIODCONTRACTOR'S NAME: Castrejon Incorporated.City of Cottage Grove Project No. 202343WORK COMPLETED TOTAL COMPLETE TO DATEPROJECT NAME: Low Zone Treatment Plant and Utility/Engineering Bldg. Fiber Optic CContractor's Schedule of Values THIS PERIOD PREVIOUS PERIODWORK COMPLETEDSITE WORKTOTAL PROJECT Original Contract PriceCOMPLETED 1 City Council Action Request 7.N. Meeting Date 3/5/2025 Department Public Works Agenda Category Action Item Title 2025 Annual City-Wide Sweeping – Contract Extension Staff Recommendation Approve the contract extension with Mike McPhillips, Inc. for the 2025 Annual City-Wide Sweeping project. Budget Implication 350 Hours at $117.00/Hour - $40,950 - Stormwater Utility Fund Attachments 1. 2025 City-Wide Sweeping Contract Extension CC Memo 2. 2025 City-Wide Sweeping Agreement for Services To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From: Genevieve Tester, EIT, Graduate Engineer Date: February 12, 2025 Re: 2025 Annual City-Wide Sweeping – Contract Extension Background In 2023, the City of Cottage Grove contracted with Mike McPhillips, Inc. to complete the City- Wide Sweeping project. The 2023 Street Sweeping Request for Quotes and Specifications document allowed for an extension of the contract for sweeping to the 2024 and 2025 spring sweeping projects at the 2023 quoted price, if mutually agreed upon between the City and the Contractor each year. Discussion The City of Cottage Grove and Mike McPhillips, Inc. mutually agreed to the extension of the 2023 contract for the 2025 Annual City-Wide Sweeping project at the 2023 rate of $117.00 per hour. A new service agreement shall be executed prior to work , which begins April 14, 2025 (weather permitting). Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve the contract extension with Mike McPhillips, Inc. for the 2025 Annual City-Wide Sweeping project. 1 AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES 2025 City-Wide Street Sweeping Project THIS AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and executed this _____day of ____________, 20 , by and between the City of Cottage Grove, 12800 Ravine Parkway, Cottage Grove, Minnesota 55016, (“City”) and Mike McPhillips, Inc., 825 Concord Street North, South Saint Paul, MN 55075 (“Contractor”). WHEREAS, the City has accepted the proposal of the Contractor for certain Services; and WHEREAS, Contractor desires to perform the Services for the City under the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual consideration contained herein, it is hereby agreed as follows: 1. SERVICES. a. City agrees to engage Contractor as an independent contractor for the purpose of performing certain Services (“Services”), as defined in the following documents: i. 2023 Request for Quotes, with a revised start date of April 14, 2025, weather depending, Exhibit 1; ii. A proposal dated February 17, 2023, Exhibit 2; iii. Agreement to extend the terms, conditions, and costs as documented in the proposal in Exhibit 1, Exhibit 3; iv. 2023 Cottage Grove City-Wide Street Sweeping Request for Quotes, Exhibit 4. (Hereinafter “Exhibits.”) Where terms and conditions of this Agreement and those terms and conditions included in the Exhibits specifically conflict, the terms of this Agreement shall apply. b. Contractor covenants and agrees to provide Services to the satisfaction of the City in a timely fashion, as set forth in the Exhibits, subject to Section 9 of this Agreement. c. Contractor agrees to comply with all federal, state, and local laws and ordinances applicable to the Services to be performed under this Agreement, including all safety standards. The Contractor shall be solely and completely responsible for conditions of the job site, including the safety of all persons and property during the performance of the Services. The Contractor represents and warrants that it 2 has the requisite training, skills, and experience necessary to provide the Services and is appropriately licensed and has obtained all permits from all applicable agencies and governmental entities. 2. PAYMENT. a. City agrees to pay the Contractor $117.00 per hour, and the Contractor agrees to receive and accept payment for Services as set forth in the Exhibits. b. Any changes in the scope of the work of the Services that may result in an increase to the compensation due the Contractor shall require prior written approval by the authorized representative of the City or by the City Council. The City will not pay additional compensation for Services that do not have prior written authorization. c. Contractor shall submit itemized bills for Services provided to City on a monthly basis. Bills submitted shall be paid in the same manner as other claims made to City. d. Prior to payment, the Contractor will submit evidence that all payrolls, material bills, subcontractors and other indebtedness connected with the Services have been paid as required by the City. 3. TERM. The term of this Agreement is identified in the Exhibits. This Agreement may be extended upon the written mutual consent of the parties for such additional period as they deem appropriate, and upon the same terms and conditions as herein stated. 4. BONDS. If the Contract Sum exceeds $100,000, Contractor shall furnish performance and payments bonds covering faithful performance of all Contract obligations, including without limitation warranty obligations, and of all payment of obligations arising under the Contract. The bonds shall each be issued in an amount equal to 100% of the stipulated sum identified in Section 2 of this Agreement. 5. TERMINATION AND REMEDIES. a. Termination for Convenience. This Agreement may be terminated by the City upon 30 days’ written notice delivered to the Contractor at the addresses listed in Section 15 of this Agreement. Upon termination under this provision, if there is no default by the Contractor, Contractor shall be paid for Services rendered and reimbursable expenses through the effective date of termination. b. Termination Due to Default. This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon written notice in the event of substantial failure by the other party to perform in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. The non-performing party shall have 3 fifteen (15) calendar days from the date of the termination notice to cure or to submit a plan for cure that is acceptable to the other party. c. Remedies. Notwithstanding the above, the Contractor shall not be relieved of liability to the City for damages sustained by the City as a result of any breach of this Agreement by the Contractor. The City may, in such event, withhold payments due to the Contractor for the purpose of set-off until such time as the exact amount of damages due to the City is determined. The rights or remedies provided for herein shall not limit the City, in case of any default by the Contractor, from asserting any other right or remedy allowed by law, equity, or by statute. d. Upon termination of this Agreement, the Contractor shall furnish to the City copies or duplicate originals of all documents or memoranda prepared for the City not previously furnished. 6. SUBCONTRACTORS. Contractor shall not enter into subcontracts for any of the Services provided for in this Agreement without the express written consent of the City, unless specifically provided for in the Exhibits. The Contractor shall pay any subcontractor involved in the performance of this Agreement within the ten (10) days of the Contractor’s receipt of payment by the City for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. 7. STANDARD OF CARE. In performing its Services, Contractor will use that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable members of its profession in the same locality at the time the Services are provided. 8. INSPECTION OF WORK. All materials and workmanship will be subject to inspection, examination, and testing by the City, who will have the right to reject defective material and workmanship or require its correction. 9. DELAY IN PERFORMANCE. Neither City nor Contractor shall be considered in default of this Agreement for delays in performance caused by circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the nonperforming party. For purposes of this Agreement, such circumstances include, but are not limited to, abnormal weather conditions; floods; earthquakes; fire; epidemics; war, riots, and other civil disturbances; strikes, lockouts, work slowdowns, and other labor disturbances; sabotage; judicial restraint; and inability to procure permits, licenses or authorizations from any local, state, or federal agency for any of the supplies, materials, accesses, or services required to be provided by either City or Contractor under this Agreement. If such circumstances occur, the nonperforming party shall, within a reasonable time of being prevented from performing, give written notice to the other party describing the circumstances preventing continued performance and the efforts being made to resume performance of this Agreement. Contractor will be entitled to payment for its reasonable additional charges, if any, due to the delay. 4 10.CITY’S REPRESENTATIVE. The City has designated Gary Orloff to act as the City’s representative with respect to the Services to be performed under this Agreement. He or she shall have complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret, and define the City’s policy and decisions with respect to the Services covered by this Agreement. 11.PROJECT MANAGER AND STAFFING. The Contractor has designated Mike Edge to be the primary contact for the City in the performance of the Services. They shall be assisted by other staff members as necessary to facilitate the completion of the Services in accordance with the terms established herein. Contractor may not remove or replace these designated staff without the approval of the City. 12.INDEMNIFICATION. a.Contractor and City each agree to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless each other, its agents and employees, from and against legal liability for all claims, losses, damages, and expenses to the extent such claims, losses, damages, or expenses are caused by its negligent acts, errors, or omissions. In the event claims, losses, damages, or expenses are caused by the joint or concurrent negligence of Contractor and City, they shall be borne by each party in proportion to its own negligence. b.Contractor shall indemnify City against legal liability for damages arising out of claims by Contractor’s employees or subcontractors, including all liens. City shall indemnify Contractor against legal liability for damages arising out of claims by City’s employees or subcontractors. 13.INSURANCE. During the performance of the Services under this Agreement, Contractor shall maintain the following insurance: a.Commercial General Liability Insurance, with a limit of $2,000,000 for any number of claims arising out of a single occurrence, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 466.04, or as may be amended; b.Workers’ Compensation Insurance in accordance with statutory requirements. c.Automobile Liability Insurance, with a combined single limit of $2,000,000. Contractor shall furnish the City with certificates of insurance, which shall include a provision that such insurance shall not be canceled without written notice to the City. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the Commercial General Liability Insurance policy. 14.WARRANTIES. Contractor warrants and guarantees that title to all work, materials, and equipment covered by any invoice, will pass to City no later than the Completion Date. 5 Contractor warrants that all work will be free from defects and that all materials will be new and of first quality. If within one (1) year after final payment any work or material is found to be defective, Contractor shall promptly, without cost to the City, correct such defect. 6 15. NOTICES. Notices shall be communicated to the following addresses: If to City: City of Cottage Grove 8635 West Point Douglas Rd S Cottage Grove, MN 55016 Attention: Gary Orloff Email: gorloff@cottagegrovemn.gov Phone: 651-458-2869 If to Contractor: Mike McPhillips, Inc. 825 Concord Street North South Saint Paul, MN 55075 Attention: Mike Edge Email: mike@mcphillipsinc.com Phone: 651-451-4030 16. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR STATUS. All services provided by Contractor, its officers, agents and employees pursuant to this Agreement shall be provided as employees of Contractor or as independent contractors of Contractor and not as employees of the City for any purpose. 17. GENERAL PROVISIONS. a. Assignment. This Agreement is not assignable without the mutual written agreement of the parties. b. Waiver. A waiver by either City or Contractor of any breach of this Agreement shall be in writing. Such a waiver shall not affect the waiving party’s rights with respect to any other or further breach. c. Nondiscrimination. Contractor agrees that in the hiring of employees to perform Services under this Agreement, Contractor shall not discriminate against any person by reason of any characteristic protected by state or federal law. d. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota and any action must be venued in Washington County District Court. e. Amendments. Any modification or amendment to this Agreement shall require a written agreement signed by both parties. 7 f. Severability. If any term of this Agreement is found be void or invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the remaining terms of this Agreement, which shall continue in full force and effect. g. Data Practices Compliance. All data collected by the City pursuant to this Agreement shall be subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13. h. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes all prior communications, understandings and agreements relating to the subject matter hereof, whether oral or written. 8 CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE By: Myron A. Bailey, Mayor By: Tamara Anderson, City Clerk Date: CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE • 12800 Ravine Parkway South • Cottage Grove, Minnesota 55016 cottagegrovemn.gov • 651-458-2800 • Fax 651-458-2897 • Equal Opportunity Employer Exhibit 1 Request for Quotes, with a revised start date of April 14, 2025, weather depending 2023 City-Wide Street Sweeping Specifications Page 1 of 3 2023 CITY-WIDE STREEET SWEEPING PROGRAM COTTAGE GROVE STREET SWEEPING REQUEST FOR QUOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS Purpose The City of Cottage Grove is currently receiving quotes to complete its Annual Spring Street Sweeping Program. Cottage Grove The City divides its program into three (3) zones. Each zone is assigned two (2) city trucks to haul sweepings to its designated disposal site and two (2) high dump sweepers to deposit sweepings into city trucks. Due to the nature of our program, no bottom dump sweepers will be considered for this activity. Approximately 300-350 hours of sweeping are anticipated for the City of Cottage Grove. Work Hours Sweeping units will be required to conduct operations from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. Contractor to provide minimum of (4) sweepers with one (1) backup available within (4) hours in the event of a sweeper breakdown. Inclement weather will be evaluated and operations may possibly cease due to rain or freezing temperatures. City Water City water will be supplied to sweeping units to aid in dust control and equipment cleanup provided they are equipped with an approved filling device. Start Date The City anticipates the 2023 program will involve approximately 300-350 hours of sweeping operations. Work shall begin on April 14, 2025 and occur continuous until completion, weather dependent. Insurance & Service Agreement A certificate of insurance and a fully executed service agreement is required to be submitted and approved before a Notice to Proceed will be issued. Insurance shall conform to the City of Cottage Grove insurance requirements, which are enclosed. 2023 City-Wide Street Sweeping Specifications Page 2 of 3 Contract Extension There will be an option to extend the contract for sweeping to the 2024 and 2025 spring sweeping projects. This extension shall be mutually agreed upon between the City and the Contractor each year and shall remain at the 2023 quoted prices. In the event of a contract extension, a new service agreement shall be executed between the City of Cottage Grove and the Contractor prior to work beginning in both 2024 and 2025. Safety The City will also hold the contractor responsible to ensure all equipment is appropriately equipped with warning lights and sounds to ensure the safety of their employees, City employees, and the Public. The contractor is also responsible for ensuring that all safety and warning devices are functioning properly during all operations. Submittal The quotation submitted shall provide a total hourly operations rate, make, model, and year of each unit. This shall include sweeping unit, operator, fuel, and maintenance costs. Quotes will be received until 10:00 a.m. February 21, 2023 at the Cottage Grove City Hall, or by email: Cottage Grove City Hall Attn: Jared Juth 12800 Ravine Parkway S Cottage Grove, MN 55016 jjuth@cottagegrovemn.gov 2023 City-Wide Street Sweeping Specifications Page 3 of 3 QUOTE 2023 CITY-WIDE STREET SWEEPING PROGRAM Directions 1. List the Make, Model, and year of your sweepers, and the hourly rate 2. Quotes will be received until 10:00 a.m. February 21, 2023 3. Work is scheduled to begin Monday April 14, 2025 (weather permitting) Make and Model Year Hourly Rate 1. $ 2. $ 3. $ 4. $ Alternates 5. $ 6. $ In submitting this quote, it is understood that the City retains the right to reject any and all quotes and to waive irregularities and informalities therein and to award the quote in the best interests of the City. Respectfully submitted, ________________________________ (a corporation) Name (an individual) (a partnership) ________________________________ Street Address ________________________________ City, State, Zip Code ________________________________ Telephone ________________________________ Signature ________________________________ Name ________________________________ CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE • 12800 Ravine Parkway South • Cottage Grove, Minnesota 55016 cottagegrovemn.gov • 651-458-2800 • Fax 651-458-2897 • Equal Opportunity Employer Exhibit 2 A Proposal dated February 17, 2023 CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE • 12800 Ravine Parkway South • Cottage Grove, Minnesota 55016 cottagegrovemn.gov • 651-458-2800 • Fax 651-458-2897 • Equal Opportunity Employer Exhibit 3 Agreement to extend the terms, conditions, and costs as documented in the proposal in Exhibit 1 CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE • 12800 Ravine Parkway South • Cottage Grove, Minnesota 55016 cottagegrovemn.gov • 651-458-2800 • Fax 651-458-2897 • Equal Opportunity Employer Exhibit 4 2023 Cottage Grove City-Wide Street Sweeping Request for Quotes 1 City Council Action Request 7.O. Meeting Date 3/5/2025 Department Public Works Agenda Category Action Item Title Denzer Park Project – Approve Plans and Specifications and Authorize Bidding Staff Recommendation Adopt Resolution 2025-029 approving the plans and specifications and authorize bidding for the Denzer Park Project. Budget Implication $285,000 - Park Trust Fund Attachments 1. Denzer Park CC Memo 2. Denzer Park Resolution 3. Denzer Park Bid Plans To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From: Genevieve Tester, EIT, Graduate Engineer Date: February 24, 2025 Re: Denzer Park Project – Approve Plans and Specifications and Authorize Bidding Background Denzer Park is a new eight-acre park located just south of 100th Street, behind Cottage Grove Logistics Park. On April 6, 2022, the City Council approved the Cottage Grove Logistics Park plat. This plat dedicated the outlot, highlighted in green in Figure 1, to the City as a future neighborhood park. With the completion of the South District Street and Utility project, and the recent residential developments in the area—proposed apartments and single-family housing— staff is planning for the implementation of Denzer Park. Figure 1: Location of Denzer Park. Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Jennifer Levitt Denzer Park Project – Approve Plans and Specification and Authorize Bidding February 24, 2025 Page 2 The park master plan includes a playground, sportcourt, tetherball court, picnicking areas, trails, open turf field (with irrigation), ponds, landscaping, and an elevated picnic shelter with a view of the Mississippi River Valley. City Council approved a grading contract in December of 2024 to finish grade the west side of the park where the elevated picnic shelter will sit. This coming spring and summer, Denzer Park will be constructed, and tentatively open to the public in early fall of 2025. The park was named by City Council Resolution 2022-149 after Jack and Marlys Denzer who were very active in the Cottage Grove community. Jack was also a Council Member and the Mayor. Staff is working with the family on a potential interpretive sign to memorialize the signifi- cance of the park name. Discussion The Park’s design and construction is a collaborative effort between City Parks staff and Engi- neering staff. The project is being managed in-house to reduce overhead and soft costs. The Parks Department will contract Park-specific items such as the boulder wall, playground, benches, and the shelter, as well as landscaping and irrigation. Engineering staff has coordi- nated plan preparation for remaining park amenities. The plans and specifications seeking approval with this memorandum and resolution (Resolution 2025-029) include the items listed in Table 1. The plans and specifications have been prepared in accordance with City standards and are attached for Council approval. The engineer’s estimate for the construction of the se items is $285,000 and is proposed to be funded through the Park Trust Fund. 1 Approximately 1800 LF of bituminous trail 2 Approximately 620 LF of concrete sidewalk, eight bench slabs, a picnic slab, and a monument slab 3 30’ x 60’ sportcourt base (aggregate and bituminous) 4 Tetherball court 5 Stormwater culvert 6 Topsoil fill and reshaping to bring to finish grade 7 Green space manhole adjustments 8 Hyrdromulching and erosion control 9 Park site construction security** Table 1: Items included in the Bid Package for Council Approval. **Park site construction security is included as an alternate on the bid. In the event of favorable bidding, the City will include the fencing in the contract ; if not, other in-house security options will be pursued. Power extension, provided by Xcel Energy, has not been finalized and will be dependent upon coordination with the Prairie Dunes Development south of Denzer Park (Prairie Dunes Final Plat approved by City Council on February 5, 2025 , Resolution 2025-013). The electrical service to be extended to Denzer Park will service both the Park as well as the streetlights along Hadley Avenue. Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Jennifer Levitt Denzer Park Project – Approve Plans and Specification and Authorize Bidding February 24, 2025 Page 2 City staff recommends that Council authorize bidding of the project. The bid date will be set by City staff. Council authorization of a specific bid date is not required by state statute. Recommendation It is recommended the City Council adopt Resolution 2025 -029 approving the plans and speci- fications and authorize bidding for the Denzer Park Project. CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2025-029 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING BIDDING FOR THE DENZER PARK PROJECT WHEREAS, plans and specifications have been prepared in accordance with the City Standards and Specifications for the Denzer Park Project; and WHEREAS, a bid date will be set by City staff; and WHEREAS, the Public Works Director has presented such plans and specifications to the City Council for approval. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, approves the plans and specifications and authorizes bidding for the Denzer Park Project. Passed this 5th day of March 2025. Myron Bailey, Mayor Attest: Tamara Anderson, City Clerk WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORTAND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF PRINT NAME: SIGNATURE:DATE:LIC. NO.Plot Date: 02/26/2025 - 12:53amDrawing name: U:\193806597\CAD\Dwg\Plansheets\193806597_G001_Park.dwgXrefs:, 193806597_BORDER_Park, 48PRCLTHE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS. DO NOT SCALE THEDRAWING - ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS SHALL BE REPORTED TO STANTEC WITHOUT DELAY.THE COPYRIGHTS TO ALL DESIGNS AND DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF STANTEC. REPRODUCTIONOR USE FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN THAT AUTHORIZED BY STANTEC IS FORBIDDEN.733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 1000Minneapolis, MN 55402www.stantec.com MINNESOTA. SHEET NUMBER DATENO SURVEY APPROVED DESIGNED DRAWN PROJ. NO. REVISION CHECKEDCITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTADENZER PARK193807397 FEBRUARY 24, 2025 PBW EPV DRS DRSENGINEERDAVID S. SANOCKI40973LMMTITLE SHEETG0.01 SHEET INDEX: G0.01 TITLE SHEET C0.01 PARK PLAN C2.01 EROSION CONTROL & SECURITY PLAN C8.01 STANDARD DETAILS C8.02 STANDARD DETAILS C8.03 STANDARD DETAILS THIS PLAN SET CONTAINS 6 SHEETS STANTEC PROJECT NO. 193807397 DENZER PARK VICINITY MAP N St a t e H i g h w a y s 1 0 & 6 1 70th St. S. 80th St. S.Jamaica Ave. S.90th St. S.Inwood Ave. S.Keats Ave. S.95th St. S. 100th St. S. 110th St. S. MYRON BAILEY MAYOR MONIQUE GARZA COUNCILMEMBER DAVE CLAUSEN COUNCILMEMBER JUSTIN OLSEN COUNCILMEMBER DAVE THIEDE COUNCILMEMBER JENNIFER LEVITT CITY ADMINISTRATOR RYAN BURFEIND DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS VACANT CITY ENGINEER KORI LAND ATTORNEY 2025 PROJECT LOCATION Ideal Ave. S.105th St. S. 80780880 9 809FES 502 >> >>FES 601 CB 602 >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l llll>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>llllllllllllllllllllllllllllSS SS SS SSSS SS >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 806806 INFILTRATION BASIN TOP 806.5 HWL 802.5 BOT 793.0 795800805805 810 804 806 806806807 808 809 811 811811 812812 60'80' 810 810810815815 805 >> HYDRANT 30' X 60' SPORTCOURT (PER DET-F) 14'x6' BENCH SLAB (PER DET-D) 20' DIA. TETHERBALL COURT (PER DET-G) PLAYGROUND TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY CITY 20' X 20' SHELTER TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY CITY ADJUST SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE ADJUST SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE ADJUST SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 8' CONCRETE SIDEWALK (PER DET-B) 8' BITUMINOUS TRAIL (PER DET-A) 8' BITUMINOUS TRAIL (PER DET-A) 8' BITUMINOUS TRAIL (PER DET-A) MONUMENT SLAB (PER SPECIAL-5) CONCRETE PAD FOR ROUND TABLES & GRILL (PER DET-E) 40'-12" RCP @ 0.50% 12" FES (PER STO-11) INV = 804.70 12" FES (PER STO-11) INV = 804.50 14'x6' BENCH SLAB (PER DET-D) 14'x6' BENCH SLAB (PER DET-D) 10'x6' BENCH SLAB (PER DET-C) 10'x6' BENCH SLAB (PER DET-C)10'x6' BENCH SLAB (PER DET-C) 10'x6' BENCH SLAB (PER DET-C) 10'x6' BENCH SLAB (PER DET-C) HADLEY AVENUE FUTURE GARDEN FUTURE GARDEN BOULDER WALLS & STEPS TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY CITY TRAIL TO END AT SHELTER AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER IN THE FIELD 808.17 807.67 807.13 806.84 806.59 806.56 806.00 810.97 815.02 813.42 808.43 809.04 809.17 806.56 806.00 806.65 807.90 807.87 808.68 808.62 808.17 807.55 809.11 809.12 808.44 807.90 810.29 817.00 809.48 810.72 806.56 806.56 806.56 806.77 807.23 807.50 807.88 808.20 807.90807.90 807.90 PARK PLANC0.01 CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1.CONCRETE SIDEWALK & BITUMINOUS TRAIL TO BE 8 FT IN WIDTH. 2.REMOVE ANY EXISTING STRUCTURE MARKERS. 3.EXCAVATED SUBGRADE & TOPSOIL GENERATED FROM THE INSTALLATION OF THE SIDEWALK, TRAILS, AND COURTS TO BE USED FOR SITE GRADING. ADDITIONAL MATERIAL MAY BE HAULED IN IF NECESSARY. 4.EXISTING MANHOLE CASTING TO BE ADJUSTED TO GROUND SURFACE. 5.TRASH CANS, BENCHES, PICNIC TABLES, & GRILLS TO BE FURNISHED & INSTALLED BY THE CITY. 6.MONUMENT SIGN TO BE FURNISHED & INSTALLED BY THE CITY. 7.SPORTCOURT SURFACING PAINT & EQUIPMENT FURNISHED & INSTALLED BY THE CITY. 8.PLAYGROUND, SHELTER, BOULDER WALL, & SHELTER STAIRS TO BE FURNISHED & INSTALLED BY THE CITY.WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORTAND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF PRINT NAME: SIGNATURE:DATE:LIC. NO.Plot Date: 02/26/2025 - 12:38amDrawing name: U:\193806597\CAD\Dwg\Plansheets\193806597_C001_Park.dwgXrefs:, 193806597_XSXV, 193806597_XSNO, 193806597_XSNU, 193806597_XSNV, 193806597_XSXT, 193806597_XSXU, 193806597_XSNO_PARK, 193806597_BORDER_ParkTHE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS. DO NOT SCALE THEDRAWING - ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS SHALL BE REPORTED TO STANTEC WITHOUT DELAY.THE COPYRIGHTS TO ALL DESIGNS AND DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF STANTEC. REPRODUCTIONOR USE FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN THAT AUTHORIZED BY STANTEC IS FORBIDDEN.733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 1000Minneapolis, MN 55402www.stantec.com MINNESOTA. SHEET NUMBER DATENO SURVEY APPROVED DESIGNED DRAWN PROJ. NO. REVISION CHECKEDCITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTADENZER PARK193807397 FEBRUARY 24, 2025 PBW EPV DRS DRSENGINEERDAVID S. SANOCKI40973LMM 0 30 60 N >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l llll>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>llllllllllllllllllllllllllllSS SS SS SSSS SS >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> INFILTRATION BASIN TOP 806.5 HWL 802.5 BOT 793.0 795800805805 810 804 806 806806807 808 809 811 811811 812812 810 810810815815 805 >> HADLEY AVENUE INLET PROTECTION (PER ERO-10) INLET PROTECTION (PER ERO-9)BLBLBLBL BLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBL BL BL BL BL BL BL BL BL BL BL BL BL BL BL BL BL BL BL BL BL BL BL BL BLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLBLINLET PROTECTION (PER ERO-9) EXISTING BIOLOGS FUTURE GARDEN FUTURE GARDEN MS MS MS MS MS MS MS MS MS MS MS MS MS MS MS MS MS MS MS MS MS MS MS MS MS SECURITY FENCING EXISTING SILT FENCE EROSION CONTROL & SECURITY PLANC2.01 CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1.ALTERNATE 1: INSTALL & MAINTAIN TEMPORARY SECURITY FENCING AROUND NORTH, EAST, & WEST SIDE OF PARK DURING CONSTRUCTION. SECURITY FENCE TO BE PORTABLE CHAIN LINK, 6' MIN. HEIGHT 2.SALVAGE & MAINTAIN EXISTING BIOLOGS & SILT FENCE FOR EROSION CONTROL. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR BRINGING THE SITE TO GRADE AND INSTALLING HYDROMULCH FOR EROSION PREVENTION. SEEDING & TURF ESTABLISHMENT BY OTHERS. 0 30 60 N EROSION CONTROL LEGEND HYDROMULCH INLET PROTECTION SECURITY FENCING EXISTING SILT FENCEMS EXISTING BIOLOGSBL WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORTAND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF PRINT NAME: SIGNATURE:DATE:LIC. NO.Plot Date: 02/26/2025 - 12:39amDrawing name: U:\193806597\CAD\Dwg\Plansheets\193806597_C201_Park.dwgXrefs:, 193806597_XSXV, 193806597_XSNO, 193806597_XSNU, 193806597_XSNV, 193806597_XSXT, 193806597_XSXU, 193806597_XSNO_PARK, 193806597_BORDER_ParkTHE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS. DO NOT SCALE THEDRAWING - ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS SHALL BE REPORTED TO STANTEC WITHOUT DELAY.THE COPYRIGHTS TO ALL DESIGNS AND DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF STANTEC. REPRODUCTIONOR USE FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN THAT AUTHORIZED BY STANTEC IS FORBIDDEN.733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 1000Minneapolis, MN 55402www.stantec.com MINNESOTA. SHEET NUMBER DATENO SURVEY APPROVED DESIGNED DRAWN PROJ. NO. REVISION CHECKEDCITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTADENZER PARK193807397 FEBRUARY 24, 2025 PBW EPV DRS DRSENGINEERDAVID S. SANOCKI40973LMM WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORTAND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF PRINT NAME: SIGNATURE:DATE:LIC. NO.Plot Date: 02/24/2025 - 12:05pmDrawing name: U:\193806597\CAD\Dwg\Plansheets\193806597_C801_Park.dwgXrefs:, 193806597_BORDER_ParkTHE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS. DO NOT SCALE THEDRAWING - ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS SHALL BE REPORTED TO STANTEC WITHOUT DELAY.THE COPYRIGHTS TO ALL DESIGNS AND DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF STANTEC. REPRODUCTIONOR USE FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN THAT AUTHORIZED BY STANTEC IS FORBIDDEN.733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 1000Minneapolis, MN 55402www.stantec.com MINNESOTA. SHEET NUMBER DATENO SURVEY APPROVED DESIGNED DRAWN PROJ. NO. REVISION CHECKEDCITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTADENZER PARK193807397 FEBRUARY 24, 2025 PBW EPV DRS DRSENGINEERDAVID S. SANOCKI40973LMMSTANDARD DETAILSC8.01 WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORTAND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF PRINT NAME: SIGNATURE:DATE:LIC. NO.Plot Date: 02/25/2025 - 10:48pmDrawing name: U:\193806597\CAD\Dwg\Plansheets\193806597_C801_Park.dwgXrefs:, 193806597_BORDER_ParkTHE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS. DO NOT SCALE THEDRAWING - ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS SHALL BE REPORTED TO STANTEC WITHOUT DELAY.THE COPYRIGHTS TO ALL DESIGNS AND DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF STANTEC. REPRODUCTIONOR USE FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN THAT AUTHORIZED BY STANTEC IS FORBIDDEN.733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 1000Minneapolis, MN 55402www.stantec.com MINNESOTA. SHEET NUMBER DATENO SURVEY APPROVED DESIGNED DRAWN PROJ. NO. REVISION CHECKEDCITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTADENZER PARK193807397 FEBRUARY 24, 2025 PBW EPV DRS DRSENGINEERDAVID S. SANOCKI40973LMMSTANDARD DETAILSC8.02 WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORTAND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSEDUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF PRINT NAME: SIGNATURE:DATE:LIC. NO.Plot Date: 02/24/2025 - 5:20pmDrawing name: U:\193806597\CAD\Dwg\Plansheets\193806597_C801_Park.dwgXrefs:, 193806597_BORDER_ParkTHE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS. DO NOT SCALE THEDRAWING - ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS SHALL BE REPORTED TO STANTEC WITHOUT DELAY.THE COPYRIGHTS TO ALL DESIGNS AND DRAWINGS ARE THE PROPERTY OF STANTEC. REPRODUCTIONOR USE FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN THAT AUTHORIZED BY STANTEC IS FORBIDDEN.733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 1000Minneapolis, MN 55402www.stantec.com MINNESOTA. SHEET NUMBER DATENO SURVEY APPROVED DESIGNED DRAWN PROJ. NO. REVISION CHECKEDCITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTADENZER PARK193807397 FEBRUARY 24, 2025 PBW EPV DRS DRSENGINEERDAVID S. SANOCKI40973LMMSTANDARD DETAILSC8.03 1 City Council Action Request 7.P. Meeting Date 3/5/2025 Department Community Development Agenda Category Action Item Title Graymont Village Third Addition – Final Plat, Development Agreement, and Development Plans Staff Recommendation 1) Adopt Resolution 2025-026 approving the Final Plat for Graymont Village Third Addition. 2) Approve the Graymont Village Third Addition Development Agreement with U.S. Home LLC subject to minor modifications by the City Attorney. 3) Adopt Resolution 2025-027 approving the Graymont Village Third Addition Development Plans dated January 31, 2025, prepared by WSB, Inc., subject to final approval by the City Engineer in writing. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. Graymont Village 3rd CC Memo 2. Graymont Village 3rd Resolution - Final Plat 3. Graymont Village 3rd Final Plat 4. Graymont Village 3rd Development Agreement 5. Graymont Village 3rd Resolution - Plans & Specs 6. Graymont Village 3rd Plans & Specs 7. Graymont Village 3rd Engineer Plan Review Letter TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator FROM: Riley Rooney, Associate Planner DATE: February 26, 2025 RE: Graymont Village Third Addition – Final Plat, Development Agreement, and Development Plans Proposal The City Council is requested to take the following actions: 1. Adopt a resolution approving the Final Plat for Graymont Village Third Addition. 2. Approve the Graymont Village Third Addition Development Agreement with U.S. HOME, LLC (Lennar). 3. Adopt a resolution approving the Graymont Village Third Addition Development Plans dated January 31, 2025, prepared by WSB, Inc. Location Map Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Jennifer Levitt Graymont Village Third Addition – Final Plat, Development Agreement, and Development Plans February 26, 2025 Page 2 of 4 Background At its May 18, 2022, meeting the City Council approved Lennar’s application for a Preliminary Plat, Rezoning, and Planned Unit Development (PUD) for a project to be known as Graymont Village. The preliminary plat consisted of 207 single family homes on approximately 65.3 acres located south of 105th Street, west of 110th Street, and north of 110th Street . Graymont Village Preliminary Plat The Graymont Village First Addition plat, shown in yellow above, was approved at the April 21, 2023, Council meeting (Resolution 2023-094). The First Addition final plat included 60 single- family lots and 4 Outlots. Outlots A, B, and D were utilized for stormwater ponding and were deeded to the City. Outlot C was retained by the developer for future phases of the development. Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Jennifer Levitt Graymont Village Third Addition – Final Plat, Development Agreement, and Development Plans February 26, 2025 Page 3 of 4 The Graymont Village Second Addition Final Plat, shown in orange above, was approved at the February 21, 2024, City Council meeting (Resolution 2024-030). The Second Addition Final Plat included 66 single family lots and Outlot A, which was retained for the third and final phase of the development. Final Plat Review Graymont Village Third Addition includes 74 single-family lots and two Outlots. Outlot A will be utilized for stormwater purposes and Outlot B will be a planned trail connection. Both outlots will be required to be deeded to the City prior to recording of the final plat. The final plat is in conform- ance with all other conditions of the preliminary plat as approved by the City Council and as stipulated in Resolution 2022-087. Graymont Village Third Addition Final Plat Development Agreement The Developer has signed the development agreement, which is attached for review . Development Plan Review The City Engineer has reviewed the development plans dated January 31, 2025, by the devel- oper’s consulting engineer WSB, Inc., and is recommending approval of those plans (e.g., con- struction plans, drawings, specifications, surveys) subject to the comments in the February 26, Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Jennifer Levitt Graymont Village Third Addition – Final Plat, Development Agreement, and Development Plans February 26, 2025 Page 4 of 4 2025, review memorandum and any subsequential memorandums from Stantec, or as modified and approved by the City Engineer in writing. Recommendation The City Council is recommended to take the following actions: 1. Adopt Resolution 2025-026 approving the Final Plat for Graymont Village Third Addition. 2. Approve the Graymont Village Third Addition Development Agreement with U.S. Home LLC subject to minor modifications by the City Attorney. 3. Adopt Resolution 2025-027 approving the Graymont Village Third Addition Development Plans dated January 31, 2025, prepared by WSB, Inc., subject to final approval by the City Engineer in writing. Attachments: A. Graymont Village Third Addition Final Plat B. Graymont Village Third Addition Development Agreement C. Graymont Village Third Addition Development Plans dated January 31, 2025 D. Engineering Review Letter dated February 26, 2025 CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2025-026 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT NAMED GRAYMONT VILLAGE THIRD ADDITION WHEREAS, U.S. Home LLC has applied for a final plat to develop a residential subdivision named Graymont Village Third Addition. This subdivision plat consists of 74 detached single- family homes and is located on the 23.33-acre property legally described as: Outlot A, Graymont Village, according to the recorded plat thereof, Washington County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held the public hearing for the preliminary plat and a zoning amendment to change the zoning from AG-2, Agricultural, to R-4, Transitional Residen- tial, for the proposed Graymont Village subdivision on April 25, 2022; and WHEREAS, the City Council subsequently accepted the Planning Commission's recommen- dations and approved the preliminary plat (Resolution No. 2022-087) and the rezoning (Ordinance No. 1058) on May 18, 2022; and WHEREAS, City staff found the Graymont Village Third Addition final plat substantially consistent with the approved preliminary plat plan; and WHEREAS, the Developer, Property Owner, and City have entered into a development agreement for the Subdivision (“Development Agreement”). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, Washington County, Minnesota, hereby approves the final plat for a residential subdivision plat named “Graymont Village Third Addition.” This plat consists of 74 detached single-family homes, located on the property legally described above. Approval of this final plat is subject to the following conditions: 1.The Developer and builders must comply with all City ordinances and policies. 2.The Developer must abide by the conditions stipulated in Resolution No. 2022-087, which approved the Graymont Village preliminary plat, except as hereafter modified. 3.All utility, drainage, and development construction must conform to the development plans and specifications dated January 31, 2025, prepared by the developer’s consulting engineer, WSB, Inc., and are subject to the comments in the February 26, 2025, review memorandum and any subsequential memorandums from Stantec, or as modified and approved by the City Engineer in writing. 4.The Developer may start rough grading of the lots before the plat is filed, if a Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Construction Storm Water Permit has been issued and the City has been furnished with a cash escrow or letter of credit in the minimum amount specified in the approved development agreement. City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota City Council Resolution 2025-026 Page 2 of 3 5. Development of this project must comply with the grading and erosion control plans as approved by the City Engineer. 6. The City will supply the street light poles and luminaries. The Developer will pay the City for street light poles and street light luminaries. 7. After the site is rough graded, but before any utility construction commences or build- ing permits are issued, the erosion control plan shall be implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion con- trol requirements if it is determined that the methods implemented are insufficient to properly control erosion. 8. The final plat must be recorded with the Washington County Recorder’s Office before any building permit can be issued. 9. The builder for each lot shall post a letter of credit or cash escrow to the City for the estimated cost of the required boulevard tree, yard trees, sod, shrubs, and final as- built survey on each lot. 10. Before final financial guarantees are released, a certificate signed by a registered en- gineer must be provided. This certificate will state that all final lot and building grades are in conformance to the grading and drainage development plan(s) approved by the City Engineer. 11. Residential lots designated to have a boundary marker(s) must have the marker(s) installed before a Certificate of Occupancy can be issued for the house on that partic- ular residential lot. For lots constructed between and November 1 and May 1, a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy can be issued, and the escrow retained until installation of the markers is confirmed. 12. Park dedication shall be addressed as stipulated within the Development Agreement. 13. All mailboxes and location of mailboxes must comply with the U.S. Post Office guide- lines and regulations. Mailboxes placed at the curb shall all be the same design and color. 14. Any easements to support infrastructure in future phases shall be the sole respon - sibility of the developer. Passed this 5th day of March 2025. Myron Bailey, Mayor City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota City Council Resolution 2025-026 Page 3 of 3 Attest: Tamara Anderson, City Clerk GRAYMONT VILLAGE THIRD ADDITION 3701 40th Avenue NW Rochester, MN 55901 507-218-3745 www.wsbeng.com SHEET 1 OF 2 KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That DRP MN 1, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, owner of the following described property: Outlot A, GRAYMONT VILLAGE SECOND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Washington County, Minnesota. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as GRAYMONT VILLAGE THIRD ADDITION and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use, the public ways and the drainage and utility easements as created by this plat. In witness whereof, said DRP MN 1, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this _______day of ______________, 20__. SIGNED: DRP MN 1, LLC By: _________________________________, its ______________________________. STATE OF ____________ COUNTY OF ____________ This instrument was acknowledged before me on this ________ day of ______________, 20__ by _________________________________, its ______________________________ of DRP MN 1, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company. ___________________________________ __________________________ Notary Public, ____________ County, Minnesota Notary Printed Name My commission expires __________________ SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I, Jeffrey J. Rolfson, do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this ________ day of _______________, 20__. _____________________________________ Jeffrey J. Rolfson, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 49003 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF WASHINGTON This instrument was acknowledged before me on ______________________ by Jeffrey J. Rolfson, Licensed Land Surveyor, Minnesota License No. 49003. ____________________________________ __________________________ Notary Public, ____________ County, Minnesota Notary Printed Name My commission expires __________________ WASHINGTON COUNTY SURVEYOR I hereby certify that in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this _______ day of _______________, 20__. ___________________________________ Washington County Surveyor CITY APPROVAL STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF WASHINGTON CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE This plat was approved by the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota, on the ______day of ___________________, 20__, and hereby certifies compliance with all requirements as set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Mayor City Clerk COUNTY AUDITOR/TREASURER Taxes payable in the year 20__ on the land described herein have been paid, there are no delinquent taxes and transfer entered this ________ day of ___________________, 20__. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ County Auditor Treasurer COUNTY RECORDER DOCUMENT NUMBER ________________________ I hereby certify that this instrument was recorded in the Office of the County Recorder for record on this ________ day of ____________________, 20__, at _______ o'clock ___M., and was duly recorded in the Washington County Records. By___________________________________ By___________________________________ Washington County Recorder Deputy N89°56'02"W 988.62 S00°47'04"W 264.37N00°43'43"E33.00N00°43'43"E 1297.77N89°56'25"E 207.70 N00°03'35"W5.03N89°58'28"E 284.43 S85°03'25"E 60.00 177.94R=170.00Δ=59°58'22" S 5 5 ° 0 1 ' 4 6 " E 1 0 5 . 8 9 1 1 6 . 3 3R= 2 0 0 .00Δ = 3 3 ° 1 9 '37"N68°17'51"E 129.72S25°12'28"E92.07S00°47'04"W75.30S89°12'56"E 43.74 S00°47'04"W 651.93N89°56'02"W 329.63N00°45'57"E59.65N89°56'02"W 299.36 S00°45'57"W 291.02N89°56'02"W 359.74 Ch d =S 3 8 ° 2 1 ' 5 8 "ECh d L = 1 1 4 . 7 0Chd=S25°02'35 "EChd L=169 .93 91.71 R=150.00 Δ=35°01'49" 1 6 5.60R=170.00Δ=55°48'51"209.34R=200.00Δ=59°58'22" 91.54 R=150.00Δ=34°58'03"N00°03'35"W 482.93N00°03'35"W 462.65N00°03'35"W 352.50N89°56'25"E 182.55 N89°56'25"E 71.48 S 5 5 ° 0 1 ' 4 6 " E 1 1 8 . 3 0 S89°59'49"E 246.09 S 5 5 ° 0 1 ' 4 6 " E 1 0 5 . 8 9 S00°47'04"W 93.57S00°47'04"W 139.53S55°53'55"W59.17S89°56'25"W 365.42 163.53R=170.00Δ=55°06'50"101.00R=170.00Δ=34°02'30"S89°56'25"W 164.49 S89°56'25"W 163.63 S89°56'25"W 162.77 S89°56'25"W 161.95 S89°56'25"W 161.12 S89°56'25"W 160.30 S89°56'25"W 159.40 S89°56'25"W 158.58 S89°56'25"W 158.16 S89°56'25"W 157.34 S89°56'25"W 156.51 S89°56'25"W 155.69 S89°56'25"W 154.86 S89°56'25"W 154.00 152.97 152.14 S89°56'25"W 151.11 S89°56'25"W 150.22 S89°56'25"W 149.39 S89°56'25"W 148.56 S89°59'49"E 140.00 S89°59'49"E 140.00 S89°59'49"E 140.00 N89°56'25"E 135.34 N89°56'25"E 136.17 N89°56'25"E 137.07 N89°56'25"E 137.94 N89°56'25"E 138.37 N89°56'25"E 138.37 N89°56'25"E 130.00 N89°56'25"E 130.00 N89°56'25"E 130.00 N89°56'25"E 130.00 N89°56'25"E 130.00 S00°03'35"E 162.30S00°03'35"E 162.30S00°03'35"E 162.30S00°03'35"E 162.30S11°03'57"E 169.69S29°20 '30 "E 148 .70S29°20 '30 "E 147 .67S34°06 '05 "E 141 .58 S 4 7 ° 2 5 ' 1 5 " E 1 2 1 . 3 9 S6 2 ° 4 4 ' 4 4 " E 1 2 2 . 9 8 S78°39' 2 0 " E 1 2 9 . 3 0 S89°12'56"E 145.00 S89°12'56"E 145.00 S89°12'56"E 145.00 S89°12'56"E 145.00N83°37'19"E 147.71N07°24'38"E 146.47N26°35'55"E 133.34N34°58'14"E 130.00N34°58'14"E 130.00N18°36'34"E 118.83N00°00'11"E72.50N89°59'48"W 124.71S34°58'14"W103.04S37°01'43"W 130.24S51°11'08"W 144.91S65°15'16"W 175.95S79°29'22"W 149.86N 4 4 ° 4 6 ' 5 1 "W 5 9 . 7 9 43.22S86°22'14"W48.62N26°59'02 "W 50 . 9 4 N 5 5 ° 0 1 ' 4 5 " W N 5 5 ° 0 1 ' 4 8 " W 6 0 . 0 0 N 5 5 ° 0 1 ' 4 5 " W 7 9 . 3 3N00°03'35"W 95.89N00°03'35"W 89.0591.34 48.66 6 . 6 9 5 3 . 1 0 4 7 . 7 7 91 . 5 760.0060.0064.93N00°03'35"W 130.00N00°03'35"W 237.15S08°18'22"W 179.11S00°00'11"W 153.74S00°00'11"W 150.37S00°00'11"W 125.43N89°59'49"W 129.02 N6 6 ° 3 9 ' 3 1 " W 1 2 1 . 7 2 N10°51'39"W 119.97N00°03'35"W 130.00N00°03'35"W 130.00N00°03'35"W 130.00S89°56'25"W S46°05'13"W35.9177.5060.0060.0060.0060.0049.6560.00 85.86 60.00 34.14 60.0060.0060.00 52.9372.5062.5160.0160.0165.0175.0130.0030.0075.0162.5160.0160.0160.0160.0130.0060.0165.0160.0160.0160.0162.5162.5177.6678.0262.5062.5060.0060.0060.0065.0060.0030.0060.0060.0060.0060.0062.5075.0075.0065.0060.0060.0062.5064.8659.8360.0060.00142.6685.1560.0060.0060.0060.0077.5072.5060.0060.0060.0062.5062.5075.50130.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 25.42 17.04 60.0060.0060.00138.37 130.0160.0025.67 92.52 123.98 41.48 41.48 33 . 7 1 6 0 . 0 0 24 . 5 9 94 . 3 2 2 3 . 9 8 3 4 . 3 0 71 . 5 9 63.9836.6172.5131.9560.0060.0060.0021.1559.177.8151.3629.8060.0072.50165.56 30.00 30.00 134.18 75.8062.5162.5160.0130.2060.00 60.00 60.00 87.63 15.58 16.15 S54°19'42"W92.92N51°26'34"E70.44N36°29'36"E 86.78N35°58'02"E 85.93N23°15'49"E 90.49N15°25'00"E 84.23N00°47'04"E 180.0060.0060.0060.0073.37Δ=35°01'49" 64.75Δ=20°36'35" 62.63Δ=29°54'21"127.85Δ=52°19'20"5 6. 6 4Δ= 1 4 °06'3 5 "56.48Δ=14°04'08"57.14Δ=14°14'06"62.03Δ=15°27'13"8.45Δ=02°06'20"8.53 Δ=03°29'31" 25.00 Δ=07°09'45"Δ=15°19'28"53.4967.33Δ=27°33'25"67.33Δ=27°33'25"36.86 Δ=10°33 ' 3 6 "Δ=15°54'36"55.54Δ=15°19'28"53.49Δ = 1 3 ° 1 9 ' 1 0 " 4 6 . 4 9 6.61Δ=01°53 '38 "Δ=05°43 '55 " 20 .01Δ=15°24'35"53.79Δ=11°00'22"38.42Δ=24°03'15"58.78Δ=09°59'15"24.40Δ=09°51'30"30.97Δ=1 6 ° 4 8 ' 0 0 " 52.7 8 Δ=08°22'19"26.30Δ=05°03'41"10.60Δ=10°59'42"34.54Δ=03°21'45"10.56S15°29'55"E66.3355.91 N84°11'30"W 10.0625.1220.32 10.25 1 3 10101414N28°38'13 "W79.8375.82101053109TH STREET S HENSLOWE AVENUE SHEMINGWAY AVENUE S30.0030.00144.43140.0030.0030.00147.70 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 3030303030303030303030302166557744OUTLOT AOUTLOT B4321654321 876543211211109876543211098765432112345617161514789101112133211615141312111098765433.00231.37FOUND RLS 10400S. LINE SE 14SEC. 29-27-21S. LINE OUTLOT A GRAYMONT VILLAGE SECOND ADDITIONW. LINE OUTLOT AGRAYMONT VILLAGE SECOND ADDITIONW. LINE SE 14 SEC. 29-27-21E. LINE OUTLOT AGRAYMONT VILLAGE SECOND ADDITIONE. LINE W. 12 E 12 SW 14 SE 14S. LINE OUTLOT A GRAYMONT VILLAGE SECOND ADDITION N. LINE OUTLOT A GRAYMONT VILLAGE SECOND ADDITION SW COR. SE 14SEC. 29-27-21S56°00'30"W35.0128.78 19.5429 29 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 101010101010101010 10 1010 1010 10 101010101010101010 10 10101010 10N31°50'04"E 172.2810.182.891010101020202020 20 20 16.24E. LINE OUTLOT DGRAYMONT VILLAGE54.93N34°58'59"E38 . 5 2 67.08D.U.E.D.U.E.D.U.E.D.U.E.GRAYMONT VILLAGE THIRD ADDITIONNSCALE IN FEET01002003701 40th Avenue NWRochester, MN 55901 507-218-3745www.wsbeng.comSHEET 2 OF 2BASIS OF BEARING SYSTEM :ALL BEARINGS ARE IN RELATIONSHIP WITH THEWEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OFSECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 21WEST, WHICH IS ASSUMED TO BE N00°43'43"E.NOTE:ALL MONUMENTS SHOWN THUS:ARE SET 38 INCH BY 14 INCH CAPPED IRON REBARWITH LICENSE NO. 49003 WHICH WILL BE SETWITHIN 1 YEAR AFTER RECORDING OF THIS PLAT.ALL MONUMENTS SHOWN THUS:ARE FOUND CAPPED IRON REBAR UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.ALL MONUMENTS SHOWN THUS:ARE FOUND WASHINGTON COUNTY CAST IRONMONUMENTS.D.U.E. = DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT = BLOCK NUMBER5PROPERTY LOCATION MAPSECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 27N, RANGE 21W293031322920192930NOT TO SCALE2829323321202829SITE1 INCH = 100 FEET110TH ST. S 105TH ST. S IDEAL AVE. S100TH ST. S 103RD ST. SBEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH, ADJOINING STREET LINESAND REAR LOT LINES AND 5 FEET IN WIDTH ON SIDELOT LINES AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT, UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTEDNOT TO SCALEDRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT DETAIL12R/W LINE5 FOOTD.U.E.5 FOOTD.U.E.10 FOOTD.U.E.10 FOOTD.U.E.REAR LOT LINESIDE LOT LINE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE PLAT OF GRAYMONT VILLAGE THIRD ADDITION BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE AND DRP MN 1, LLC AND U.S. HOME, LLC 2 THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into on the day of , 2025, by and between the CITY, the OWNER and DEVELOPER, all as identified herein. RECITALS: WHEREAS, the OWNER is the fee simple OWNER of the DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY; and WHEREAS, in pursuant of the DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, the DEVELOPER and OWNER have applied to the CITY for approval of the DEVELOPMENT PLANS and FINAL PLAT for Graymont Village Third Addition; and WHEREAS, in conjunction with the granting of these approvals, the CITY requires the installation and/or availability of public utilities (sewer and water), public streets, storm sewer pipes, ponds, street lighting and other facilities; and WHEREAS, under authority granted to it, including Minnesota Statutes Chapters 412, 429, and 462, the COUNCIL approved the FINAL PLAT and DEVELOPMENT PLANS on the following conditions: 1. That the DEVELOPER and OWNER enter into this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, which contract defines the work which the DEVELOPER undertakes to complete; and 2. The DEVELOPER shall provide an irrevocable letter of credit and cash deposits in the amounts and with conditions satisfactory to the CITY, providing for assurance of payment for the actual construction and installation of the improvements in the DEVELOPMENT PLANS, as specified and required by the CITY. WHEREAS, the DEVELOPMENT PLANS were prepared by a registered professional engineer and have been submitted to and approved by the CITY ENGINEER. NOW, THEREFORE, subject to the terms and conditions of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT and in reliance upon the representations, warranties and covenants of the parties herein contained, the CITY, OWNER and DEVELOPER agree as follows: ARTICLE 1 DEFINITIONS 1.1. TERMS. The following terms, unless elsewhere defined specifically in the DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, shall have the following meanings as set forth below. 1.2. BUILDER. “BUILDER” means an entity that will be constructing a residence on a lot in the FINAL PLAT. 1.3. CITY. “CITY” means the City of Cottage Grove, a Minnesota municipal corporation. 3 1.4. CITY ENGINEER. “CITY ENGINEER” means the City Engineer of the City of Cottage Grove or delegatees. 1.5. CITY WARRANTIES. “CITY WARRANTIES” means all CITY WARRANTIES identified in Article 12 of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. 1.6. COUNCIL. “COUNCIL” means the Council of the City of Cottage Grove. 1.7. COUNTY. “COUNTY” means Washington County, Minnesota. 1.8. DEVELOPER. “DEVELOPER” means U.S. Home, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. 1.9. DEVELOPER DEFAULT. “DEVELOPER DEFAULT” means and includes, jointly and severally, any of the following or any combination thereof: a) failure by the DEVELOPER to timely pay the CITY any money required to be paid under the DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT; b) failure by the DEVELOPER to timely construct the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS according to the DEVELOPMENT PLANS and the CITY standards and specifications; c) failure by the DEVELOPER to observe or perform any covenant, condition, obligation or agreement on its part to be observed or performed under this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT; d) breach of the DEVELOPER WARRANTIES. 1.10. DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS. “DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS” means and includes, individually and collectively, all the improvements identified in Article 4. 1.11. DEVELOPER WARRANTIES. “DEVELOPER WARRANTIES” means all DEVELOPER WARRANTIES identified in Article 10 of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. 1.12. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. “DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT” means this instant agreement by and among the CITY, OWNER and DEVELOPER. 1.13. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. “DEVELOPMENT PLANS” means the street infrastructure and utility plans dated January 3, 2025, prepared by WSB Engineering, or as may be updated and approved by the City Engineer, hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. 1.14. DEVELOPMENT PROJECT. “DEVELOPMENT PROJECT” means a residential development to be known as Graymont Village Third Addition that will be constructed on the DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY that is substantially in conformance with the FINAL PLAT. 4 1.15. DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY. “DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY” means that real property legally described on Exhibit A, attached hereto, upon which the DEVELOPMENT PROJECT will be constructed. 1.16. FINAL PLAT. “FINAL PLAT” means the FINAL PLAT, approved by the COUNCIL on March 5, 2025, attached hereto as Exhibit B. 1.17. FORCE MAJEURE. “FORCE MAJEURE” means acts of God, including, but not limited to floods, ice storms, blizzards, tornadoes, landslides, lightning and earthquakes (but not including reasonably anticipated weather conditions for the geographic area), riots, global pandemics, insurrections, war or civil disorder affecting the performance of work, blockades, power or other utility failures, and fires or explosions. 1.18. FORMAL NOTICE. “FORMAL NOTICE” means notices given by one party to the other if in writing and if and when delivered or tendered either in person or by depositing it in the United States mail in a sealed envelope, by certified mail, return receipt requested, with postage and postal charges prepaid, addressed as follows: If to CITY: City of Cottage Grove Attention: City Administrator 12800 Ravine Parkway South Cottage Grove, MN 55016 If to OWNER: DRP MN 1, LLC 590 Madison Ave., 13th Floor New York, NY 10022 With a Copy to: Brian Clauson, Authorized Signatory 4027 Drumcliffe Circle Rosemount, MN 55068 If to DEVELOPER: U.S. Home, LLC 16305 36th Avenue North, Suite 600 Plymouth, MN 55446 or to such other address as the party addressed shall have previously designated by notice given in accordance with this Section. Notices shall be deemed to have been duly given on the date of service if served personally on the party to whom notice is to be given, or on the third day after mailing if mailed as provided above, provided, that a notice not given as above shall, if it is in writing, be deemed given if and when actually received by a party. 1.19. INDIRECT COSTS. “INDIRECT COSTS” means the costs related to: a) Finance, administration and legal costs; and 5 b) Engineering services performed by CITY Staff; and c) Testing and Right of Way services; and d) Consulting engineering services. 1.20. OTHER REGULATORY AGENCIES. “OTHER REGULATORY AGENCIES” means and includes, individually and collectively, the following: a) Minnesota Department of Transportation b) Washington County c) Washington County Highway Department d) South Washington Watershed District e) Minnesota Department of Health f) Minnesota Pollution Control Agency g) Metropolitan Council h) Minnesota Department of Natural Resources i) Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources j) Any other regulatory or governmental agency or entity affected by or having jurisdiction over the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS. 1.21. OWNER. “OWNER” means DRP MN 1, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. 1.22. OWNER DEFAULT. “OWNER DEFAULT” means and includes, jointly and severally, any of the following or any combination thereof: a) failure by the OWNER to timely pay the CITY any levied assessments required to be paid under the DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT; b) failure by the OWNER to observe or perform any covenant, condition, obligation or agreement on its part to be observed or performed under this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT; c) breach of the OWNER WARRANTIES. 6 1.23. OWNER WARRANTIES. “OWNER WARRANTIES” means that the OWNER hereby warrants and represents the following: a) AUTHORITY. OWNER is the fee simple OWNER of DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY and has the right, power, legal capacity and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, and no approvals or consents of any persons are necessary in connection with the authority of OWNER to enter into and perform its obligations under this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. b) NO DEFAULT. OWNER is not in default under any lease, contract or agreement to which it is a party or by which it is bound which would affect performance under this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. OWNER is not a party to or bound by any mortgage, lien, lease, agreement, instrument, order, judgment or decree which would prohibit the execution or performance of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT by OWNER or prohibit any of the transactions provided for in this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. c) NO LITIGATION. There is no suit, action, arbitration or legal, administrative or other proceeding or governmental investigation pending, or threatened against or affecting OWNER. d) FULL DISCLOSURE. None of the representatives and warranties made by OWNER or made in any exhibit hereto or memorandum or writing furnished or to be furnished by OWNER or on its behalf contains or will contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit any material fact the omission of which would be misleading. e) FEE TITLE. OWNER owns fee title to all the land in the FINAL PLAT. 1.24. PRELIMINARY PLAT. “PRELIMINARY PLAT” means the preliminary plat approved by the COUNCIL. 1.25. PRIOR EASEMENT HOLDERS. “PRIOR EASEMENT HOLDERS” means and includes, jointly and severally, all holders of any easements or other property interests which existed prior to the grant or dedication of any public easements transferred by the FINAL PLAT or transferred pursuant to this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. 1.26. SITE IMPROVEMENTS. “SITE IMPROVEMENTS” means and includes, individually and collectively, all the improvements identified on Exhibit C and in Article 3. 1.27. UTILITY COMPANIES. “UTILITY COMPANIES” means and includes, jointly and severally, the following: a) Utility companies, including electric, gas and cable; b) Pipeline companies. 7 ARTICLE 2 FINAL PLAT APPROVAL 2.1. FINAL PLAT APPROVAL. The COUNCIL approved the FINAL PLAT. All conditions contained in the CITY Council Resolution for the FINAL PLAT shall be considered a condition of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. 2.2. RECORDING OF FINAL PLAT. The DEVELOPER shall record the FINAL PLAT and this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT with the COUNTY Recorder. No building permits shall be issued unless the DEVELOPER shows evidence to the CITY that the FINAL PLAT and this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT have been recorded with the COUNTY Recorder and the CITY has received the financial obligations required in Article 15. ARTICLE 3 SITE IMPROVEMENTS 3.1. SITE IMPROVEMENTS. DEVELOPER shall construct and install, at its own cost, all SITE IMPROVEMENTS identified on Exhibit C in accordance with industry standards for making public improvements. 3.2. AREA CHARGES. The CITY imposes Area Charges for sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer impacts to all new developments pursuant to City Code Section 8-1-3 C.3 and the Fee Schedule. Such Area Charges are identified on Exhibit G. ARTICLE 4 DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS 4.1. DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS. The DEVELOPER shall install, at its own cost, the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS in accordance with the DEVELOPMENT PLANS and in accordance with the approvals of the CITY Council, and all ordinances and PRELIMINARY and FINAL PLAT resolutions of the CITY or any amendments thereto and any Miscellaneous Requirements on Exhibit D, attached hereto. 4.2. GROUND MATERIAL. The DEVELOPER shall ensure that adequate and suitable ground material shall exist in the areas of public street and utility improvements and shall guarantee the removal, replacement or repair of substandard or unstable material through the warranty period. The cost of said removal, replacement or repair is the responsibility of the DEVELOPER. 4.3. GRADING/DRAINAGE PLAN, EASEMENTS AND HOURS OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. a) The DEVELOPER shall construct drainage facilities adequate to serve the DEVELOPMENT PROJECT in accordance with the DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The DEVELOPER agrees to grant to the CITY all necessary outlots and temporary or permanent easements for the preservation and maintenance of the drainage system, 8 for drainage basins and for utility service and for utility looping. The DEVELOPER shall enter into any easement agreements and stormwater management agreements with the CITY that are deemed necessary to fulfill the obligations of this Section. The grading and drainage plan shall include lot and building elevations, drainage swales to be sodded, storm sewer, catch basins, erosion control structures and ponding areas necessary to conform to the overall CITY storm sewer plan. The grading of the site shall be completed in conformance with the DEVELOPMENT PLANS, subject only to such design criteria and engineering design and construction specifications as are used in the DEVELOPMENT PLANS notwithstanding any amendment or change to CITY standards for development subsequent to approval of the FINAL PLAT. b) DEVELOPER shall dedicate drainage and utility easements as shown on the FINAL PLAT. Additional utility and drainage easements that may be required by the CITY may be granted by an acceptable document as approved by the CITY. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy to a BUILDER for any dwelling unit constructed on a lot within the subdivision, a Certificate of Compliance by a land surveyor must be submitted to the CITY by the BUILDER reflecting conformance with the approved grading plan and confirming that the lot corner monuments are installed. DEVELOPER shall provide the CITY an as-built survey of the DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY in PDF and AUTOCAD format after the final rough grading is complete for review and approval prior to development utility installation. c) Building construction and general construction activities are limited to Monday through Friday between the hours 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM and on Saturday between the hours of 9:00 AM and 7:00 PM. Site grading/excavation and street and utility construction activities are limited to Monday through Friday between the hours 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM and on Saturday between the hours of 9:00 AM and 7:00 PM. Building construction and construction activities are not allowed on City- observed holidays. 4.4. GRADING OF PUBLIC STREETS. The DEVELOPER must grade, in accordance with the grading plan provided to and approved by the CITY, all public and private streets, boulevards, driveways and other public lands, if any, and other lands shown in the approved grading plan and as required in Exhibit F. If the DEVELOPER does not perform the work required by this paragraph, the CITY will complete all work required of the DEVELOPER. The DEVELOPER will be financially responsible for payments for this work, which will be assessed as provided in Section 16.2. 4.5. INTERIM BITUMINOUS STREET. The DEVELOPER will construct a bituminous wedge for the roadways within the FINAL PLAT. The bituminous wedge will be removed, and final wear course installed once 90% of the residences have final Certificates of Occupancy or after two (2) years. At the end of two (2) years from the day the bituminous wedge is installed, even if 90% of the homes do not have Certificates of Occupancy, the DEVELOPER will remove the wedge and place the wear course pavement. The DEVELOPER is responsible for 9 the replacement of any damaged sidewalk or curbside. The BUILDER will be responsible to preserve and protect the public roadway and any sidewalk/trail. 4.6. PUBLIC STREET MAINTENANCE. DEVELOPER is responsible for all maintenance, upkeep and repair of all public streets contained within the FINAL PLAT from initiation of construction through final acceptance by the CITY. 4.7. STREET SWEEPING. The DEVELOPER is responsible for the removal of all construction debris and earth materials within the public right of way typically resulting from new home construction activities. The CITY will inspect the roadways to ensure the DEVELOPER is keeping all public roadway surfaces clean. If any portion of a public roadway surface is found in an unacceptable condition, the CITY will have appropriate equipment dispatched to the site and all costs associated with the clean-up effort will be billed to the DEVELOPER. 4.8. STREET SIGNS. The CITY shall manufacture and install street identification signs and non-mechanical and non-electrical traffic control signs. DEVELOPER shall be financially responsible for these costs. Street signs will be in conformance with the names as indicated on the FINAL PLAT and pursuant to CITY standards. The actual number and location of signs to be installed shall be determined by the CITY. 4.9. SOD AND CURB BOX. The DEVELOPER agrees that the BUILDER must pay for and install cultured sod from the street curb to the rear lot line(s) of each lot in the entire FINAL PLAT and curb box installed in working condition. For a lot where a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy is issued between October 2 and May 31 of the following year, completion of the work described in this paragraph shall be completed by the BUILDER by June 15; for a lot where a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy is issued between June 1 and October 1, completion of the work described in this paragraph shall be completed by the BUILDER by October 15. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, it is agreed that in lieu of the BUILDER installing sod on each lot, the BUILDER may provide to a lot owner a certificate that entitles the lot owner to have sod delivered to that lot at the owner’s request for installation by the lot owner. All pond access routes shall be sodded by the DEVELOPER. 4.10. BOULEVARD AND AREA RESTORATION. All boulevards shall be permanently sodded within 30 days of final grading, with the exception of those boulevards directly adjacent to buildable lots. These boulevards may be temporarily seeded until the lot is final graded, and then sod shall be installed. The DEVELOPER shall restore all other areas disturbed by the development grading operation in accordance with the approved erosion control plan, over the entire FINAL PLAT. Upon request of the CITY ENGINEER, the DEVELOPER shall remove the silt fences once the vegetation on the surrounding area has reached 70% coverage. 4.11. LOT CORNER MONUMENTS. The DEVELOPER shall install all subdivision lot corner monumentation within one year from the date of recording the FINAL PLAT, or the monumentation shall be installed on a per lot basis at the time the building permit for the subject lot is issued, whichever occurs first. At the end of the one-year period from recording of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, the DEVELOPER shall submit to CITY ENGINEER written 10 verification by a registered land surveyor that the required monuments have been installed throughout the FINAL PLAT. 4.12. BOULEVARD TREES. The DEVELOPER or BUILDER shall contact the City Forester for the purposes of staking the location of the boulevard trees to be planted and approving the tree species. Each lot requires at least one boulevard tree. Corner lots require a boulevard tree on each City right of way that abuts the property. The minimum size of tree to be planted in the City’s right of way shall be two-and-a-half inch (2½”) caliper, as measured by the American Association of Nurserymen. All boulevard trees shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality, and disease free as determined by the City Forester for twelve (12) months after planting. 4.13. STREET MAINTENANCE, RESTORATION, ACCESS AND REPAIR DURING CONSTRUCTION. The DEVELOPER or BUILDER shall clear, on a daily basis, any soil, earth or construction debris from the surrounding streets and lands within or adjacent to the FINAL PLAT resulting from the grading or building on the land within the FINAL PLAT by the DEVELOPER or its agents, and shall restore to the CITY’s specifications any gravel base contaminated by mixing construction or excavation debris, or earth in it, and repair to the CITY’s specifications any damage to bituminous surfacing resulting from the use of construction equipment. Furthermore, the DEVELOPER shall maintain reasonable access to any occupied buildings within the FINAL PLAT, including necessary street maintenance such as grading, graveling, patching and snow removal prior to permanent street surfacing. The DEVELOPER agrees to perform and assume all responsibilities relating to snow removal and ice control, if the streets have not been accepted for winter maintenance by the CITY ENGINEER by October 15, or later if approved by the CITY’s Public Works Director. Completion of the work described in this section shall be completed within fifteen (15) days after notice by the CITY to the DEVELOPER that repair or restoration is required. Saturday working hours for the site grading/street and utility construction should start at 9:00 a.m. 4.14. OCCUPANCY AND ACCESS. a) No building permit for any lot shall be issued until the DEVELOPER has constructed a temporary access consisting of a bituminous surface base that is acceptable in design by the CITY and the conditions on Exhibit D have been followed. Special consideration may be given for two model home building permits if approved by the City’s Building Official and Fire Marshal as follows: i. One model home permit may be issued prior to roadway Class V gravel base and utilities being installed; and ii. One additional model home permit may be issued after Class V gravel base and utilities and storm sewer pipes have been installed, as long as “Out of Service” hydrant tags have been installed on all out of service hydrants within the development. b) A temporary certificate of occupancy for any home may be issued in accordance with the following: 11 i. The DEVELOPER has constructed a temporary bituminous roadway that is acceptable in design and approved by the CITY; ii. Water and sanitary sewer improvements are installed, tested, televised, reviewed and available for use as described in Exhibit D, Section 2(d). Hydrant tags must also be removed; iii. Grading as builts have been approved by the CITY ENGINEER. c) No final certificate of occupancy for any lot shall be issued until the first lift of street pavement and the pavement wedge has been installed; Furthermore, the DEVELOPER is responsible for the construction and cost of constructing any necessary temporary bituminous roadway before the public roadway is constructed and shall maintain reasonable access to any occupied home or homes, including necessary street maintenance prior to permanent street improvements that are accepted by the CITY. 4.15. DRIVEWAYS. Upon building a residence on a lot, the BUILDER shall construct a concrete or bituminous surface driveway for the lot in accord with CITY approved standards. For a lot for which a certificate of occupancy is issued between August 1 and May 1 of the following year, completion of the work described in this paragraph must be completed by June 15; for a lot for which a certificate of occupancy is issued between May 1 and July 31, completion of the work described in this paragraph shall be completed by September 15. 4.16. VEGETATION. The DEVELOPER shall comply with CITY ordinances and policies related to preservation of vegetation and trees and specifically shall exercise reasonable efforts in residential areas to save mature, non-diseased trees and vegetation on the subject land which do not have to be removed for reasonable installation of buildings, streets, utilities or drainage improvements, construction activities related thereto, or site grading. Prior to any excavation, the DEVELOPER shall require a certified arborist to install tree protection on all trees that are to be saved and mark such trees with a red band prior to any excavation. All diseased trees shall be removed according to CITY ordinance requirements. 4.17. LANDSCAPING. The responsibility for landscaping requirements are as follows: a) The DEVELOPER is responsible for: i. Installing all landscaping improvements within the lots shown on the DEVELOPER’S approved landscape plan. ii. Installing all landscaping improvements as depicted on the DEVELOPER’S landscape plan in a timely manner. b) Single-family lots shall meet the following standards: i. Property owners shall maintain their yards all the way to the curb or shoulder of the abutting roadways, sidewalks and trail for each parcel, including any landscaping in the boulevards. 12 ii. Property owners shall maintain their yards to the edge of any abutting CITY trail. iii. The DEVELOPER is responsible to ensure that the BUILDER plants the following number, size, and types of trees and shrubs prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for each lot: 1. A minimum of two (2) trees and ten (10) shrubs planted on each lot with a lot width of 60 feet or less. This shall not include the boulevard tree; 2. A minimum of three (3) trees and ten (10) shrubs planted on each lot with a lot width greater than 60 feet or less. This shall not include the boulevard tree; 3. Deciduous trees shall be two different species, and a coniferous tree may be substituted; 4. Deciduous trees must have a trunk caliper width of not less than two and a half inches; 5. Coniferous trees shall not be less than six feet in height. 4.18. EROSION CONTROL. The DEVELOPER shall provide and follow a plan for erosion control and pond maintenance in accord with the Best Management Practices (BMP) as delineated in the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency online Minnesota Stormwater Manual and the grading permit from the CITY. Such plan shall be detailed on the DEVELOPMENT PLANS and shall be subject to approval of the CITY ENGINEER. The DEVELOPER shall install and maintain such erosion control structures as appear necessary under the DEVELOPMENT PLANS and as required in Exhibit F. The DEVELOPER shall be responsible for all damage caused as the result of grading and excavation within the FINAL PLAT including, but not limited to, restoration of existing control structures and clean-up of public right of way, until all lots are final graded and improvements are completed. As a portion of the erosion control plan, the DEVELOPER shall seed or sod any disturbed areas in accordance with the DEVELOPMENT PLANS. After the site is rough graded, the DEVELOPER must provide erosion control devices as detailed on the Development Plans or as reasonably required by the City. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the DEVELOPER does not provide erosion control, the CITY may, after a twenty-four (24) hour notice, take appropriate action to control erosion. The CITY may, without notice draw upon any posted financial guarantee to pay costs incurred by the CITY in controlling erosion within the FINAL PLAT, or at the CITY’s option, assess the additional costs incurred as part of the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS. 4.19. PROHIBITION ON TRANSFER OF RESPONSIBILITY. The DEVELOPER must not transfer or assign its responsibility to perform the requirements of Street Sweeping, Street Signs, Street Maintenance, Restoration, Access and Repair, Landscaping, and Erosion Control to any lot purchaser or BUILDER of a home on any lot within the FINAL PLAT. Notwithstanding the foregoing, it is agreed that DEVELOPER may transfer its responsibility for sod installation, provided DEVELOPER remains liable for the performance thereof and it is understood and agreed that upon transfer of the NPDES permit to the BUILDER or buyer of an individual lot, all responsibilities subsumed under the said NPDES permit specific to the subject lot shall, thereafter, be the BUILDER’S or buyer’s responsibility and not DEVELOPER’S responsibility. 13 4.20. WEED/GRASS MAINTENANCE. During the term of this AGREEMENT, DEVELOPER must not allow or permit within the FINAL PLAT, including land deeded to the CITY for public purposes, any weeds, grass, brush, or other rank vegetation to a height greater than eight (8) inches, or permit any accumulation of dead weeds, grass or brush. In the event the DEVELOPER fails to comply with this provision, the CITY may give the DEVELOPER notice to cut or remove material in violation of this paragraph. All costs of cutting or removing incurred by the CITY must be paid by the DEVELOPER or assessed against the property that is in violation. The DEVELOPER shall maintain all City Outlots until acceptance in writing by City Staff. ARTICLE 5 PARK CONTRIBUTION REQUIREMENTS 5.1. PARK DEDICATION. The DEVELOPER shall comply with the park dedication requirements as defined in the City Code. Park dedication fees identified in Exhibit G must be paid prior to the release of the FINAL PLAT. ARTICLE 6 PERMITS, LICENSES AND OTHER APPROVALS 6.1. PERMITS. The DEVELOPER shall obtain all necessary approvals, permits and licenses from the CITY, the OTHER REGULATORY AGENCIES and the UTILITY COMPANIES, as identified on Exhibit E, attached hereto. Major design requirements of any such entities shall be determined prior to completion and incorporated into the DEVELOPMENT PLANS. All costs incurred to obtain said approvals, permits and licenses, and also all fines or penalties levied by any agency due to the failure of the DEVELOPER to obtain or comply with conditions of such approvals, permits and licenses, shall be paid by the DEVELOPER. The DEVELOPER shall defend and hold the CITY harmless from any action initiated by the OTHER REGULATORY AGENCIES and the UTILITY COMPANIES resulting from such failures of the DEVELOPER. ARTICLE 7 OTHER DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS 7.1. MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS. Any additional requirements to approval of the FINAL PLAT and DEVELOPMENT PLANS as specified by the COUNCIL are incorporated herein and identified on Exhibit D. 7.2. TREE MITIGATION. DEVELOPER shall comply with all tree mitigation requirements in City Code Title 11-3-13 and City approvals. ARTICLE 8 [INTENTIONALLY BLANK] 14 ARTICLE 9 RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS 9.1. DEVELOPER AND SITE IMPROVEMENT COSTS. The DEVELOPER shall pay for the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS and SITE IMPROVEMENTS; that is, all costs of persons doing work or furnishing skills, tools, machinery or materials, or insurance premiums or equipment or supplies and all just claims for the same; and the CITY shall be under no obligation to pay the contractor or any subcontractor any sum whatsoever on account thereof, whether or not the CITY shall have approved the contract or subcontract. Such site improvements are identified on Exhibit C. The DEVELOPER is responsible for contracting and paying for the street and utility testing costs. The CITY’s designated inspector on the DEVELOPMENT PROJECT will coordinate the street and utility testing activities. All testing reports shall be sent to the CITY with a copy to the DEVELOPER. If deductions are owed on the street and utility construction pursuant to the MNDOT standards for construction, then these deductions will be paid by DEVELOPER to CITY within thirty (30) days after DEVELOPER receives notices of such deductions. 9.2. ENFORCEMENT COSTS. The DEVELOPER shall pay the CITY for costs incurred in the enforcement of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, including engineering costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees. 9.3. TIME OF PAYMENT. DEVELOPER shall pay all bills from the CITY within thirty (30) days after billing. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall bear interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per year. ARTICLE 10 DEVELOPER WARRANTIES 10.1. STATEMENT OF DEVELOPER WARRANTIES. The DEVELOPER hereby warrants and represents the following: a) AUTHORITY. DEVELOPER is the DEVELOPER of the DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY in the FINAL PLAT and has the right, power, legal capacity and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, and no approvals or consents of any persons are necessary in connection with the authority of DEVELOPER to enter into and perform its obligations under this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. b) NO DEFAULT. DEVELOPER is not in default under any lease, contract or agreement to which it is a party or by which it is bound which would affect performance under this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. DEVELOPER is not a party to or bound by any mortgage, lien, lease, agreement, instrument, order, judgment or decree which would prohibit the execution or performance of this 15 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT by DEVELOPER or prohibit any of the transactions provided for in this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. c) PRESENT COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. DEVELOPER has complied with and is not in violation of applicable federal, state or local statutes, laws, and regulations including, without limitation, permits and licenses and any applicable zoning, environmental or other law, ordinance or regulation affecting the FINAL PLAT and the DEVELOPMENT PLANS and the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS; and DEVELOPER is not aware of any pending or threatened claim of any such violation. d) CONTINUING COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. DEVELOPER will comply with all applicable federal, state and local statutes, laws and regulations including, without limitation, permits and licenses and any applicable zoning, environmental or other law, ordinance or regulation affecting the FINAL PLAT and the DEVELOPMENT PLANS and the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS. e) NO LITIGATION. There is no suit, action, arbitration or legal, administrative or other proceeding or governmental investigation pending, or threatened against or affecting DEVELOPER or the FINAL PLAT or the DEVELOPMENT PLANS or the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS. DEVELOPER is not in default with respect to any order, writ, injunction or decree of any federal, state, local or foreign court, department, agency or instrumentality. f) FULL DISCLOSURE. None of the representatives and warranties made by DEVELOPER or made in any exhibit hereto or memorandum or writing furnished or to be furnished by DEVELOPER or on its behalf intentionally contains or will contain any untrue statement of material fact or intentionally omit any material fact the omission of which would be misleading. Any unintentional untrue statements or omissions shall be corrected or cured within thirty (30) days after the DEVELOPER receives FORMAL NOTICE or obtains knowledge of such error, unless an extension is granted by the CITY. g) PLAT COMPLIANCE. The FINAL PLAT and the DEVELOPMENT PLANS comply with all CITY, COUNTY, metropolitan, state and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to, subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances and environmental regulations. h) WARRANTY ON PROPER WORK AND MATERIALS. The DEVELOPER warrants all work required to be performed by it under this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT against defective material and faulty workmanship for a period of two (2) years after its completion and acceptance by the CITY. The DEVELOPER shall be solely responsible for all costs of performing repair work required by the CITY within thirty (30) days of notification. All trees, grass, and sod shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality, and disease free for one year after planting. Any replacements shall be similarly warranted for one year from the time of planting. The warranty period for street and drainage and erosion control improvements shall be for 16 two (2) years after completion and acceptance by the CITY; the warranty for the street, drainage and erosion control improvements shall also include the obligation of the DEVELOPER to repair and correct any damage to or deficiency with respect to such improvements. i) OBTAINING PERMITS. The DEVELOPER shall obtain in a timely manner and pay for all required permits, licenses and approvals, and shall meet, in a timely manner, all requirements of all applicable, local, state and federal laws and regulations which must be obtained or met before the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS may be lawfully constructed. A list of the CITY permits, licenses, and approvals required is identified on Exhibit E. ARTICLE 11 OWNER WARRANTIES 11.1. STATEMENT OF OWNER WARRANTIES. The OWNER hereby makes and states the OWNER WARRANTIES in Section 1.23. ARTICLE 12 CITY WARRANTIES 12.1. STATEMENT OF CITY WARRANTIES. The CITY hereby warrants and represents as follows: a) ORGANIZATION. CITY is a municipal corporation duly incorporated and validly existing in good standing the laws of the State of Minnesota. b) AUTHORITY. CITY has the right, power, legal capacity and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. ARTICLE 13 INDEMNIFICATION OF CITY 13.1. INDEMNIFICATION OF CITY. Provided the CITY is not in DEFAULT under the DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT with respect to the particular matter causing the claim, loss or damage, DEVELOPER shall indemnify, defend and hold the CITY, its COUNCIL, agents, employees, attorneys and representatives harmless against and in respect of any and all claims, demands, actions, suits, proceedings, losses, costs, expenses, obligations, liabilities, damages, recoveries, and deficiencies, including interest, penalties and attorneys’ fees, that the CITY incurs of suffers, which arise out of, result from or relate to: a) breach by the DEVELOPER of the DEVELOPER WARRANTIES; b) failure of the DEVELOPER to timely construct the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS according to the DEVELOPMENT PLANS and the CITY ordinances, standards and specifications; 17 c) failure by the DEVELOPER to observe or perform any covenant, condition, obligation or agreement on its part to be observed or performed under this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT; d) failure by the DEVELOPER to pay contractors, subcontractors, laborers, or materialmen; e) failure by the DEVELOPER to pay for materials; f) approval by the CITY of the FINAL PLAT; g) approval by the CITY of the DEVELOPMENT PLANS; h) failure to obtain the necessary permits and authorizations to construct the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS; i) construction of the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS; j) delays in construction of the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS; k) payment by DEVELOPER for any required costs or assessments; l) all costs and liabilities arising because building permits were issued prior to the completion and acceptance of the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS. 13.2. NOTICE. Within a reasonable period of time after the CITY’s receipt of actual notice of any matter giving rise to a right of payment against the CITY pursuant to Section 13.1, the CITY shall give the FORMAL NOTICE in reasonable detail to the DEVELOPER. The DEVELOPER shall not be obligated to make any payment to the CITY for any such claim until the passage of thirty (30) days from the date of its receipt of FORMAL NOTICE from the CITY, during which time the DEVELOPER shall have the right to cure or remedy the event leading to such claim. 13.3. DEFENSE OF CLAIM. Provided the CITY is not in DEFAULT under the DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT with respect to the particular matter causing the claim or demand, with respect to claims or demands asserted against the CITY by a third party of the nature covered by Section 13.1, and provided that the CITY gives FORMAL NOTICE thereof, the DEVELOPER will, at its sole expense, provide for the defense thereof with counsel of its own selection but approved by the CITY; the DEVELOPER will pay all costs and expenses including attorneys’ fees incurred in so defending against such claims, provided that the CITY shall at all times also have the right to fully participate in the defense at the CITY’s expense. If the DEVELOPER fails to defend, the CITY shall have the right, but not the obligation, to undertake the defense of, and to compromise or settle the claim or other matter, for the account of and at the risk of the DEVELOPER. 18 ARTICLE 14 CITY REMEDIES UPON DEVELOPER DEFAULT 14.1. CITY REMEDIES. If a DEVELOPER DEFAULT occurs, that is not caused by FORCE MAJEURE, the CITY shall give the DEVELOPER FORMAL NOTICE of the DEVELOPER DEFAULT and the DEVELOPER shall have thirty (30) days to cure the DEVELOPER DEFAULT. If the DEVELOPER, after FORMAL NOTICE to it by the CITY, does not cure the DEVELOPER DEFAULT, then the CITY may avail itself of any remedy afforded by law and any of the following remedies: a) the CITY may specifically enforce this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT; b) the CITY may suspend any work, improvement or obligation to be performed by the CITY; c) the CITY may collect on the irrevocable letter of credit (“LOC”) or cash deposit pursuant to Article 15 hereof; d) the CITY may suspend or deny building and occupancy permits for buildings within the FINAL PLAT; e) the CITY may, at its sole option, perform the work or improvements to be performed by the DEVELOPER, in which case the DEVELOPER shall within thirty (30) days after written billing by the CITY reimburse the CITY for any costs and expenses incurred by the CITY. In the alternative, the CITY may in whole or in part, specially assess any of the costs and expenses incurred by the CITY; and the DEVELOPER hereby waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the installation and construction of the work and improvements and the special assessment resulting therefrom, including, but not limited to, notice and hearing requirement and any claim that the special assessments exceed benefit to the FINAL PLAT. The DEVELOPER hereby waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 14.2. NO ADDITIONAL WAIVER IMPLIED BY ONE WAIVER. In the event any agreement contained in this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT is breached by the DEVELOPER and thereafter waived in writing by the CITY, such waiver shall be limited to the particular breach so waived and shall not be deemed to waive any other concurrent, previous or subsequent breach hereunder. All waivers by the CITY must be in writing. 14.3. NO REMEDY EXCLUSIVE. No remedy herein conferred upon or reserved to the CITY shall be exclusive of any other available remedy or remedies, but each and every such remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy given under the DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or by statute. No delay or omission to exercise any right or power accruing upon any default shall impair any such right or power or shall be construed to be a waiver thereof, but any such right and power may be exercised from time to time and as often as may be deemed expedient. In order to entitle the CITY to exercise any remedy reserved to it, it shall not be necessary to give notice, other than the FORMAL NOTICE. 19 14.4. EMERGENCY. Notwithstanding the requirement contained in Section 14.1 hereof relating to FORMAL NOTICE to the DEVELOPER in case of a DEVELOPER DEFAULT and notwithstanding the requirement contained in Section 14.1 hereof relating to giving the DEVELOPER a right to cure the DEVELOPER DEFAULT, in the event of an emergency as determined by the CITY ENGINEER, resulting from the DEVELOPER DEFAULT, the CITY may perform the work or improvement to be performed by the DEVELOPER without giving any notice or FORMAL NOTICE to the DEVELOPER and without giving the DEVELOPER the right to cure the DEVELOPER DEFAULT. In such case, the DEVELOPER shall within thirty (30) days after written billing by the CITY reimburse the CITY for any and all costs incurred by the CITY. In the alternative, the CITY may, in whole or in part, specially assess the costs and expenses incurred by the CITY; and the DEVELOPER hereby waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the installation and construction of the work and improvements and the special assessments resulting therefrom, including, but not limited to, notice and hearing requirements and any claim that the special assessments exceed benefit to the FINAL PLAT. The DEVELOPER hereby waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. ARTICLE 15 FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS 15.1. DEVELOPER’S LETTER OF CREDIT AMOUNT. Prior to release of the FINAL PLAT for recording, the DEVELOPER shall deposit with the CITY an irrevocable LOC for the amounts required in Exhibits C and F. In lieu of an irrevocable LOC, DEVELOPER may deposit cash or other security acceptable to CITY. All cost estimates shall be acceptable to the CITY ENGINEER. The bank and form of the irrevocable LOC shall be subject to approval by the CITY Finance Director and shall continue to be in full force and effect until released by the CITY. The irrevocable LOC shall have auto-renewal terms. The irrevocable LOC shall secure compliance by the DEVELOPER with the terms of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. The CITY may draw down on the irrevocable LOC or cash deposit, without any further notice than that provided in Section 14.1 relating to a DEVELOPER DEFAULT, for any of the following reasons: a) a DEVELOPER DEFAULT; or b) upon the CITY receiving notice that the irrevocable LOC will be allowed to lapse. The CITY shall use the LOC proceeds to reimburse the CITY for its costs and to cause the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS to be constructed to the extent practicable; if the CITY ENGINEER determines that such DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS have been constructed and after retaining 10% of the proceeds for later distribution pursuant to Section 15.2, the remaining proceeds shall be distributed to the DEVELOPER. With CITY approval, the irrevocable LOC may be reduced pursuant to Section 15.2 from time to time as financial obligations are paid. 20 15.2. LOC RELEASE AND ESCROW INCREASE; DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS. The DEVELOPER may request that the LOC required by the DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT be reduced at the following milestones: a) LOC reductions. DEVELOPER may request the LOC be reduced at the following milestones and in such amounts that are commensurate with the amount of work that has been completed to date, but subject to the limitations for retainage amounts needed during the warranty period, as described below: i. Two (2) grading reductions at least two (2) months apart, except for pond cleaning. ii. Three (3) site improvement reductions at least two (2) months apart. iii. One (1) landscaping reduction. b) LOC or cash escrow release. Upon FINAL ACCEPTANCE by the CITY ENGINEER or COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR of each portion of the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS and upon commencement of the warranty periods, the LOC or cash escrows will be released as follows: i. Grading will be released in full, and no retainage is required through the warranty period with the exception of pond cleaning which will be retained in its entirety though the warranty period. ii. Landscaping will be reduced by 50% and the balance will be retained through the warranty period. iii. Streets will be reduced by 75% and the balance will be retained through the warranty period. iv. DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS will be reduced by 75% and the balance will be retained through the warranty period. Following the expiration of the warranty periods, all LOC and cash escrows will be released. If it is determined by the CITY that the DEVELOPMENT PLANS were not strictly adhered to, or that work was done without CITY inspection, the CITY may require, as a condition of acceptance, that the DEVELOPER post an irrevocable LOC, or cash deposit equal to 125% of the estimated amount necessary to correct the deficiency or to protect against deficiencies arising therefrom. In the event that work, which is concealed, was done without permitting CITY inspection, then the CITY may, in the alternative, require the concealed condition to be exposed for inspection purposes. 15.3. DEVELOPER’S CASH FEES AND CASH ESCROW REQUIREMENTS. At the time that the DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT is approved, DEVELOPER shall deposit cash and cash escrows with the CITY for those items and in the amounts required in Exhibit G. 15.4. BUILDER’S CASH FEES AND CASH ESCROW REQUIREMENTS. DEVELOPER shall notify each BUILDER that certain building permit fees and an escrow shall be required prior to the issuance of a building permit for each lot for those items and in the amount stated 21 on Exhibit H, attached hereto. If the DEVELOPER is the only BUILDER pulling building permits, the CITY, in its sole discretion, may accept an irrevocable LOC from the DEVELOPER for each lot, in an amount equal to or exceeding the total amount of cash escrow requirement that would otherwise be required under this paragraph. ARTICLE 16 MISCELLANEOUS 16.1. CITY’S DUTIES. The terms of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT shall not be considered an affirmative duty upon the CITY to complete any DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS. 16.2. ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS. If the DEVELOPER fails to construct the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS, the CITY at its option, may install and construct the DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS. In such case, the CITY, at its option, may specially assess the cost wholly or in part therefore under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, or may draw on the irrevocable LOC or cash deposit. If the CITY specially assesses the cost of any portion thereof, then the DEVELOPER hereby waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the installation of the improvements and the special assessments, including, but not limited to, notice and hearing requirements and any claim that the special assessments exceed the benefit to the FINAL PLAT. The DEVELOPER waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minnesota Statute § 429.081. The DEVELOPER acknowledges that the benefit from the improvements equal or exceed the amount of the special assessments. 16.3. NO THIRD PARTY RECOURSE. Third parties shall have no recourse against the CITY under this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. 16.4. VALIDITY. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph or phrase of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. 16.5. RECORDING. The DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT and PLAT shall be recorded with the COUNTY Recorder and the OWNER and DEVELOPER shall provide and execute any and all documents necessary to implement the recording. 16.6. BINDING AGREEMENT. The parties mutually recognize and agree that all terms and conditions of this recordable DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT shall run with the land in the FINAL PLAT, and shall be binding upon the successors and assigns of the DEVELOPER. This DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT shall also run with and be binding upon any after acquired interest of the DEVELOPER in the land made the subject of the FINAL PLAT. 16.7. CONTRACT ASSIGNMENT. The DEVELOPER may not assign this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT without the prior written consent of the COUNCIL, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld. In such case, the third-party buyer will be required to accept and assume all contractual and financial responsibilities provided in this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. Upon satisfaction of such requirements by such third-party buyer, the DEVELOPER’s obligations hereunder shall terminate. Absent approval of the Council, the 22 DEVELOPER’s obligations hereunder shall continue in full force and effect, even if the DEVELOPER sells one or more lots, the entire PLAT, or any part of it. 16.8. AMENDMENT AND WAIVER. The parties hereto may by mutual written agreement amend this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT in any respect. Any party hereto may extend the time for the performance of any of the obligations of another, waive any inaccuracies in representations by another contained in this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT or in any document delivered pursuant hereto which inaccuracies would otherwise constitute a breach of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, waive compliance by another with any of the covenants contained in this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, waive performance of any obligations by the other or waive the fulfillment of any condition that is precedent to the performance by the party so waiving of any of its obligations under this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. Any agreement on the part of any party for any such amendment, extension or waiver must be in writing. No waiver of any of the provisions of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT shall be deemed, or shall constitute, a waiver of any other provisions, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver. 16.9. GOVERNING LAW. This DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. 16.10. COUNTERPARTS. This DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. 16.11. HEADINGS. The subject headings of the paragraphs and subparagraphs of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT are included for purposes of convenience only and shall not affect the construction of interpretation of any of its provisions. 16.12. INCONSISTENCY. If the DEVELOPMENT PLANS are inconsistent with the words of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT or if the obligation imposed hereunder upon the DEVELOPER are inconsistent, then that provision or term which imposes a greater and more demanding obligation on the DEVELOPER shall prevail. 16.13. ACCESS. The DEVELOPER hereby grants to the CITY, its agents, employees, officers, and contractors a license and right of entry to enter the DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the CITY during the installation of DEVELOPER IMPROVEMENTS and SITE IMPROVEMENTS. [The remainder of this page has been intentionally left blank.] 23 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. CITY: CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE By: Myron Bailey Its Mayor By: Tamara Anderson Its City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON ) On this day of , 2025, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared Myron Bailey and Tamara Anderson to me personally known, who being each by me duly sworn, each did say that they are respectively the Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Cottage Grove, the municipality named in the foregoing instrument, and that the said instrument was signed in behalf of said municipality by authority of its City Council and said Mayor and City Clerk acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said municipality. Notary Public A-1 EXHIBIT A DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY Real property situated in the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, legally described as: Lots 1-8, inclusive, Block 1, Graymont Village Third Addition Lots 1-6, inclusive, Block 2, Graymont Village Third Addition Lots 1-5, inclusive, Block 3, Graymont Village Third Addition Lots 1-16, inclusive, Block 4, Graymont Village Third Addition Lots 1-10, inclusive, Block 5, Graymont Village Third Addition Lots 1-12, inclusive, Block 6, Graymont Village Third Addition Lots 1-17, inclusive, Block 7, Graymont Village Third Addition Outlot A, Graymont Village Third Addition Outlot B, Graymont Village Third Addition B-1 EXHIBIT B FINAL PLAT B-2 C-1 EXHIBIT C SITE IMPROVEMENTS Site Improvement LOC Estimated Construction Cost Sanitary Sewer $ 542,305.50 Watermain $ 876,090.50 Storm Sewer $ 898,840.00 Streets $ 1,061,009.00 Street Lighting $ 120,690.00 Subtotal: $ 3,498,935.00 Water Main Credit For Oversizing $ (77,080.00) Subtotal: $ 3,421,855.00 LOC (125%) $ 4,277,318.75 Final Streets Construction Cost $ 309,175.00 Final Streets LOC (130%): $ 401,927.50 Total Site Improvement LOC: $ 4,679,246.25 D-1 EXHIBIT D MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS IMPOSED BY THE CITY 1) CONDITIONS TO BE SATISFIED BEFORE CITY RELEASES THE FINAL PLAT TO BE RECORDED. a) Letter of Credit. DEVELOPER must provide the LOC required in this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. b) All Cash Deposits. DEVELOPER must pay all cash deposits required in this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. c) Planning Fees. DEVELOPER must pay the CITY all planning, engineering review and legal fees that have been incurred up to the date of approval of this DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. d) Park Dedication. DEVELOPER must pay park dedication fees as required in Exhibit G. e) Outlot A and B. DEVELOPER must provide a fully executed Warranty Deed to the CITY for Outlot A and Outlot B. 2) BUILDING PERMITS. No building permits may be obtained until: a) All the conditions in Paragraph 1 of this Exhibit D have been met; b) All storm water ponds and associated drainage features including storm sewer and drainage swales have been installed; c) All sanitary sewer and water main, including services, have been installed, tested, televised as necessary, and reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and are available for use; d) The base course of bituminous for the streets serving the lot must be constructed by the DEVELOPER and approved by the CITY and determined by the CITY to be available for use. e) The following documents have been recorded: • Final Plat • Development Agreement • Warranty Deed for Outlot A and Outlot B D-2 3) CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY. Prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy, all the following conditions must be satisfied: a) All the conditions listed in Paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Exhibit D must be satisfied. b) Lot as-built surveys have been approved by the CITY. c) All trees and shrubs required in Section 4.17(a) and (b) have been planted. d) All sod has been installed. 4) SUBDIVISION EROSION CONTROL. DEVELOPER is responsible for erosion control throughout the FINAL PLAT pursuant to the NPDES permit until all lots in the FINAL PLAT are built upon and until turf is established in each of the individual lots in the FINAL PLAT. 5) CLEAN UP OF CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS ON STREETS AND ADJOINING PROPERTY. The escrow amount stated on Exhibit G shall include an appropriate amount as determined by the Director of Public Works to ensure that the DEVELOPER removes any construction debris from streets adjoining the FINAL PLAT and from private properties that adjoin the FINAL PLAT. During the construction of the residences and other improvements within the FINAL PLAT, the DEVELOPER is responsible for removing any construction debris (including roofing materials, paper wrappings, construction material and other waste products resulting from construction) that may be blown from the construction site into adjoining private properties or into CITY streets or that may fall from delivery trucks onto adjoining private properties or CITY streets. Further, during construction, the DEVELOPER must clear the CITY streets of any dirt or other earthen material that may fall onto the CITY streets from the delivery trucks that are being used in the excavation and grading of the site. 6) MAILBOXES. The DEVELOPER is responsible for the placement of a mailbox for all the lots within the DEVELOPMENT PROJECT and must comply with the United States Postal Service’s mailbox design and placement requirements. The mailboxes must all be of similar design and color within the DEVELOPMENT PROJECT. 7) SIDEWALK SNOW REMOVAL AND TRAIL MAINTENANCE. The CITY shall provide snow removal of transportation trails and sidewalks once 90% of homes are occupied within the DEVELOPMENT PROJECT. Until that time, the DEVELOPER or property owner abutting the trail or sidewalk must remove the snow and/or ice. E-1 EXHIBIT E PERMITS, LICENSES AND OTHER APPROVALS 1. Any licenses or permits required by the Minnesota Department of Health. 2. NPDES Permit from the MPCA. 3. Right of way Permit from the CITY. 4. Any contractor licenses from the CITY or the State of Minnesota. 5. Building Permits from the CITY. 6. Electrical Permits from the CITY. 7. Utility permits that may be required from the CITY, State of Minnesota or any utility company. F-1 EXHIBIT F DEVELOPER’S LETTER OF CREDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE GRADING & EROSION CONTROL AND LANDSCAPING ITEMS Site Grading & Erosion Control Unit Qty Unit Cost Total Misc. Site Grading LS 1 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 Pond Maintenance & Cleaning LS 2 $ 5,000.00 $ 10,000.00 Erosion Control - Temp. Rock Construction Entrance EA 3 $ 1,500.00 $ 4,500.00 Erosion Control - Siltfence, Machine Sliced LF 2030 $ 4.00 $ 8,120.00 EOF & Swale Seed/Blanket SY 5429 $ 5.00 $ 27,145.00 Street Sweeper With Pick-up Broom HR 40 $ 200.00 $ 8,000.00 Total - Site Grading & Erosion Control $ 77,765.00 LOC (150%) $ 116,647.50 LANDSCAPING Site Landscaping Unit Qty Unit Cost Total Site Landscaping LS 1 $ 169,465.00 $ 169,465.00 Total Site Landscaping $ 169,465.00 LOC (150%) $ 254,197.50 G-1 EXHIBIT G DEVELOPER’S CASH REQUIREMENTS AND INDIRECT COST CASH ESCROW CASH REQUIREMENTS City Fees Unit Qty Unit Cost Total City Supplied Poles & Luminaires EA 15 $ 3,601.40 $ 54,021.00 Street Light - New Developments EA 74 $ 151.68 $ 11,224.32 Park Dedication Fees (Single Family) LS 74 $ 4,659.90 $ 344,832.60 Sealcoating - Trails SY 142 $ 2.50 $ 355.00 Park and Open Space Identification Markers EA 13 $ 175.00 $ 2,275.00 Business Park AUAR Charge AC 22.253 $ 111.00 $ 2,470.08 2% Engineering Fee LS 1 $ 74,620.60 $ 74,620.60 Total Fees $ 489,798.60 CASH ESCROW Engineering Fees Total Concept Review Fee $ 37,310.30 Plan Review Fee $ 84,620.60 City Inspection/Testing Fee $ 196,551.50 Total Escrow $ 318,482.40 AREA CHARGES Area Charges Cost/Acre Acres Total Sanitary Area Charge (South District Upper) $ 3,600.00 22.253 $ 80,110.80 Water Area Charge (Remainder of City) $ 6,010.00 22.253 $ 133,740.53 Storm Area Charge (South District - Single Family) $ 9,160.00 22.253 $ 203,837.48 Total Area Charges $ 417,688.81 H-1 EXHIBIT H BUILDER’S ESCROW REQUIREMENTS AND CASH REQUIREMENTS LOC ESCROW Builder Escrow Per Lot Yard & Boulevard Sod $ 7,100.00 Lot Grading and Corner Pin Compliance Escrow $ 1,000.00 Boulevard Trees $ 500.00 Curb Box $ 500.00 Admin Fee $ 500.00 Total Per Lot: $ 9,600.00 Total LOC * $ 710,400.00 * Builder LOC covers 74 single family lots CASH REQUIREMENTS Building Permit Fees Per Lot Boulevard Tree & Sod Inspection Fee $ 165.00 Curb Box Inspection Fee $ 170.00 Grading As-built Survey Certification Fee $ 39.00 Right of way Permit Fee $ 50.00 Total Cash Added to Building Permit $ 424.00 CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2025-027 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRAYMONT VILLAGE THIRD ADDITION WHEREAS, U.S. Home LLC has applied for a final plat to develop a residential subdivision named Graymont Village Third Addition. This subdivision plat consists of a total of 74 single family homes and 2 outlots to be located on property legally described as: Outlot A, Graymont Village, according to the recorded plat thereof, Washington County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the Developer will utilize the approved plans and specifications dated January 31, 2025, as prepared by WSB, Inc. to construct the public improvements within the subdivision; and WHEREAS, the Developer will install the public improvements within the subdivision in accordance with current City ordinances and policies; and WHEREAS, a development agreement and financial sureties are required for the development of this project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council for the City of Cottage Grove, Washington County, Minnesota, hereby approves the Graymont Village Third Addition construction plans and specifications dated January 31, 2025, as prepared by WSB, Inc., subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer and builders must comply with all City ordinances and policies. 2. The developer and builders must comply with the review comments found in the February 26, 2025, memorandum and any subsequential memorandum from Stantec. 3. Modifications to final construction plans and specifications shall be approved in writing by the City Engineer. Passed this 5th day of March 2025. Myron Bailey, Mayor Attest: Tamara Anderson, City Clerk 105TH ST S IDEAL AVE S110TH ST S 1st ADDITION 2nd ADDITION DEVELOPMENT AREA TITLE SHEET SCALE: 1 G0.01 PROJECT LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE N THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS CONCERNING TYPE AND LOCATION OF PRIVATE UTILITIES HAS BEEN DESIGNATED UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THESE QUALITY LEVELS WERE DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE DATA". THE CONTRACTOR IS TO DETERMINE THE TYPE AND LOCATION OF PRIVATE UTILITIES AS MAY BE DEEMED NECESSARY TO AVOID DAMAGE THERETO. WSB Project No. ..................................... 019623-000 Issue Date................................................ 01-28-2025 - BID DOCUMENTS UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS FOR: COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 1.EXISTING SITE INFORMATION WAS TAKEN FROM TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY COMPLETED BY WSB, GOLDEN VALLEY, MINNESOTA DATED FEBRUARY 2022. AT THE TIME OF SURVEY, THE SITE WAS FALLOW AGRICULTURAL FIELD. ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS MAY VARY. VERIFY ALL FIELD CONDITIONS INCLUDING LOCATION OF ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. NOTIFY THE OWNER AND ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES AFFECTING THE SCOPE OF THIS CONTRACT. SEE SURVEY FOR BENCHMARK INFORMATION. PROTECT ALL PROPERTY CORNERS. RELOCATE BENCHMARKS AS NECESSARY WITH NEW BENCHMARK LOCATIONS WITHIN A TOLERANCE OF 0.010 VERTICAL FEET. 2.THE CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE'S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREET AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION SHALL GOVERN FOR ALL IMPROVEMENTS ON THE PROJECT. 3.CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY WHICH BLOCKS TRAFFIC OF ANY STREET, ALLEY, OR DRIVE IS SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE. 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL STOP WORK IMMEDIATELY AND NOTIFY THE ENGINEER AND OWNER IF CONTAMINANTS ARE FOUND IN THE EXISTING SOILS. 5.PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AT ALL TIMES WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA. DO NOT ALLOW WATER TO POND IN EXCAVATION AREAS, AND MAINTAIN ALL EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERNS. 6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO COMPLY WITH ALL OSHA REGULATIONS IN THE EXECUTION OF WORK UNDER THIS CONTRACT. 7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS FROM THE CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 8.ALL NON-PAVED AREAS SHALL RECEIVE A SIX-INCH (6") LAYER OF TOPSOIL. SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR PERMANENT GROUND COVER. 9.ALL CONCRETE WASHOUT PRACTICES MUST MEET OR EXCEED THE MPCA STANDARDS. 10.ALL DISCHARGE OF TURBID OR SEDIMENT-LADEN WATERS RELATED TO DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING (E.G. PUMPED DISCHARGES, TRENCH/DITCH CUTS FOR DRAINAGE) SHALL DISCHARGE INTO A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEDIMENT BASIN UNLESS INFEASIBLE. IF A SEDIMENT BASIN IS NOT AVAILABLE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TREAT ALL DISCHARGE WITH APPROPRIATE BMP's SO THAT ANY DISCHARGE DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE SURFACE WATER OR DOWNSTREAM PROPERTIES 11.REFER TO "GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT FOR: JULEN & STU-MAC PROPERTIES, IDEAL AVENUE AND 110th STREET SOUTH, COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA", PREPARED BY BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION, DATED DECEMBER 14, 2021 FOR SUBSURFACE DATA, RECOMMENDATIONS AND BORING LOGS. GENERAL NOTES: Engineer Contact: WSB 178 E 9TH STREET SUITE 200 ST PAUL, MN 55101 KYLE W. HOFF, PE PHONE: 608-632-1432 EMAIL: KHOFF@WSBENG.COM GRAYMONT VILLAGE THIRD ADDITION K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000 CP-TITL-PLAN.dwg 1/27/2025 10:54:06 AMG0.01 SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/28/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709Sheet List Table Sheet Number Sheet Title G0.01 TITLE SHEET C0.01 EXISTING CONDITIONS C0.02 DEMOLITION PLAN C1.01 TYPICAL SECTION C1.02 STORM STRUCTURE TABLE C1.03 SANITARY STRUCTURE TABLE C1.04 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE SHEET C2.01 OVERALL SITE PLAN C2.02 SITE PLAN - NORTH C2.03 SITE PLAN - SOUTH C3.01 OVERALL GRADING PLAN C3.02 GRADING PLAN NORTH C3.03 GRADING PLAN SOUTH C3.04 STORMWATER BASIN DETAILS C3.05 STORMWATER DETAILS C3.06 NORTH RESTORATION PLAN C3.07 SOUTH RESTORATION PLAN C3.08 SWPPP C3.09 SWPPP C3.10 SWPPP C4.01 OVERALL UTILITY PLAN C4.02 HEMINGWAY AVENUE S. - SANITARY AND WATER PLAN AND PROFILE C4.03 HEMINGWAY AVENUE S. - SANITARY AND WATER PLAN AND PROFILE C4.04 HEMINGWAY AVENUE S. - SANITARY AND WATER PLAN AND PROFILE C4.05 HENSLOWE AVENUE S. - SANITARY AND WATER PLAN AND PROFILE C4.06 HENSLOWE AVENUE S. - SANITARY AND WATER PLAN AND PROFILE C4.07 HENSLOWE AVENUE S. - SANITARY AND WATER PLAN AND PROFILE C4.08 HENSLOWE AVENUE S. - SANITARY AND WATER PLAN AND PROFILE C4.09 109TH STREET S. - SANITARY AND WATER PLAN AND PROFILE C4.10 109TH STREET S. - SANITARY AND WATER PLAN AND PROFILE C5.01 HEMINGWAY AVE S. - STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE C5.02 HEMINGWAY AVENUE S. - STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE C5.03 HEMINGWAY AVENUE S. - STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE C5.04 HENSLOWE AVENUE S. - STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE C5.05 HENSLOWE AVENUE S. - STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE C5.06 HENSLOWE AVENUE S. - STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE C5.07 HENSLOWE AVENUE S. - STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE C5.08 109TH STREET S. - STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE C5.09 109TH STREET S. - STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE C5.10 BACKYARD STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE C5.11 BACKYARD STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE C5.12 BACKYARD STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE C5.13 BACKYARD STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE C5.14 BACKYARD STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE C5.15 BACKYARD STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE C5.16 BACKYARD STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE C5.17 BACKYARD STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE C5.18 BACKYARD STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE C5.19 BACKYARD STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE C6.01 HEMINGWAY AVENUE S. - STREET PLAN AND PROFILE C6.02 HEMINGWAY AVENUE S. - STREET PLAN AND PROFILE C6.03 HEMINGWAY AVENUE S. - STREET PLAN AND PROFILE C6.04 HENSLOWE AVENUE S. - STREET PLAN AND PROFILE C6.05 HENSLOWE AVENUE S. - STREET PLAN AND PROFILE C6.06 HENSLOWE AVENUE S. - STREET PLAN AND PROFILE C6.07 HENSLOWE AVENUE S. - STREET PLAN AND PROFILE C6.08 109TH STREET S. - STREET PLAN AND PROFILE C6.09 109TH STREET S. -STREET PLAN AND PROFILE C6.10 INTERSECTION DETAILS C7.01 TRAFFIC SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN - NORTH C7.02 TRAFFIC SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN - SOUTH C8.01 STANDARD DETAIL PLATES C8.02 STANDARD DETAIL PLATES C8.03 STANDARD DETAIL PLATES C8.04 STANDARD DETAIL PLATES C8.05 STANDARD DETAIL PLATES C8.06 STANDARD DETAIL PLATES C8.07 STANDARD DETAIL PLATES C8.08 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS C8.09 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS C8.10 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS C8.11 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS C8.12 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS C8.13 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS LIT 1.1 LIGHTING DETAILS LIT 1.2 LIGHTING PLAN LIT 1.3 LIGHTING PLAN LS 1.01 LANDSCAPE PLAN 01/31/202501/31/2025 ST-8 ST-6 ST-3 SB SB SB ST-2 SB ST-5 SB ST-4 SB ST-1 SB TETETETETETETETETETETETETETECDE CDECDEOHPOHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHP OHPE E E E EOHPOHP E E >l>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> STMH 107 STMH 109 STMH 110STMH 111STMH 112STMH 113 STMH 114 CBMH 118 PLUG 109A PLUG 115A PLUG 116 FES 201 CBMH 202 CBMH 203 CBMH 204 CB 205 CB 214 OCS 117FES 301 CBMH 302 CBMH 303 CB 304 CBMH 305 CBMH 306 CBMH 312 CBMH 307 CBMH 308 CB 310CB 311 CB 309 CB 313 MH 4MH 5 MH 6 MH 7MH 8MH 10MH 11 PLUG 6B PLUG 12A PLUG 11A STMH 108 MH 9 STMH 115 MH 12 lllllllllllllllWEST BASIN NWL - DRY BOTTOM - 800 CO 14 CO 13 CENTRAL BASIN NWL - DRY BOTTOM - 799 PLUG 6A X XXXMB ||| S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SSS S ST ST ST-7SB ST-9 SB ST-10 SB ST-12 SB ST-11 SB SB 105TH STREET SOUTH 106TH STREET SOUTH 108TH ST R E E T S O U T H 107TH STREET SOUTHHERON AVENUE SOUTH110TH ST S 107TH ST S HENSLOWE AVE SHEMINGWAY AVE SHINTON AVENUE SOUTHS S SSS SS S S S SSSS S PROPERTY BOUNDARY RIGHT-OF-WAY BUILDING SETBACK LINE TEMPORARY DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT TEMPORARY CUL-DE-SAC EASEMENT CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST LOT LINE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT ST-13 EXISTING CONDITIONS C0.01 C F/O G OHE UGE UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATION UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND GAS OVERHEAD POWER UNDERGROUND POWER SANITARY LINE STORM LINE WATERMAIN LINE FENCE S SANITARY MANHOLE STORM MANHOLE CATCH BASIN HYDRANT GATE VALVE ST LIGHT POLE SIGN ELECTRIC PEDESTAL COMMUNICATION PEDESTAL GAS METER LEGEND SB SOIL BORING LOCATION N SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 150 300 SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN RIGHT-OF-WAY LOT LINE TEMPORARY DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT TEMPORARY CUL-DE-SAC EASEMENT CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT CDE TE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT REMOVE TEMPORARY BITUMINOUS CUL-DE-SAC SB TETETETETETETETETETETETETETETETETETESB SB SB ST-8 ST-11ST-10 ST-13 ST-12 SB SBSB SB SB ST-9SB ST-7SB ||| || ||| SALVAGE HYDRANT REMOVE REDUCER AND 10 LF 6" WATERMAIN PIPE 110TH ST S SSS S SS>>>>>>>>STSTST ST ST>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SALVAGE HYDRANT REMOVE REDUCER AND 10 LF 6" WATERMAIN PIPE REMOVE HYDRANT AND 30 LF 6" WATERMAIN PIPE ||||||||||||||||||||S S S S S S > > > >>HINTON AVE SHENSLOWE AVE S108TH ST S HEMINGWAY AVE S|LEGEND REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000 CP-DEMO-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 2:08:47 PMC0.02 DEMOLITION PLAN N FEET 0 H: INSCALE 80'160' DEMOLITION NOTES 1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE SITE PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A BID TO BECOME FAMILIAR WITH ALL SITE CONDITIONS. ALL SURFACE FEATURES THAT CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED CONDITIONS SHALL BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED WHETHER OR NOT SHOWN ON SURVEY OR SPECIFICALLY CALLED OUT. THIS INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO CLEARING AND GRUBBING. 2.EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES ARE TO BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. INSTALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PRIOR TO DEMOLITION. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ALL SMALL UTILITY OWNERS FOR THE DEMOLITION & RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITY STRUCTURES AND LINES AS NECESSARY TO ACCOMMODATE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. 4.MAINTAIN FIRE ACCESS WITHIN 150 FEET OF EXTERIOR AREAS OF ALL BUILDINGS DURING CONSTRUCTION. 5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE MUTCD FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL REQUIREMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR MAY BE REQUIRED TO PHASE CONSTRUCTION TO MINIMIZE DISRUPTION TO TRAFFIC AND MAINTAIN SITE SAFETY. CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS SHALL BE PERFORMED IN A WAY TO MINIMIZE THE DISRUPTION TO THE NORMAL FLOW OF TRAFFIC ON ALL STREETS AND ROADS. 6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AND CONFORM TO ALL PERTINENT CITY, COUNTY AND STATE DETAILS, SPECIFICATIONS, PERMITS, AND COORDINATE INSPECTIONS AS REQUIRED BY THE GOVERNING BODY DURING THE ENTIRE PROJECT DURATION. 7.CONTACT PUBLIC AND PRIVATE UTILITY OWNERS A MINIMUM OF 72 HOURS PRIOR TO THE START OF WORK. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO LOCATE AND PROTECT ALL EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES NOT SCHEDULED FOR REMOVAL. NO ADDITIONAL PAYMENT WILL BE MADE FOR REPAIRING DAMAGE TO EXISTING UTILITIES, RELOCATING, WORKING AROUND, OR PROTECTING EXISTING UTILITIES OR OTHER APPURTENANCES. 8.COORDINATE WITH PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES (ELECTRIC, GAS, COMMUNICATIONS) FOR TERMINATION REMOVAL AND OR RELOCATION OF EXISTING SERVICES THROUGHOUT SITE AND REPLACEMENT WITH NEW SERVICES FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. 9.REMOVE TOPSOIL WITHIN LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION. STOCKPILE ON-SITE FOR USE IN AREAS NOT SCHEDULED FOR BUILDING, PAVEMENT, OR SIDEWALK. 10.SAWCUT EXISTING PAVEMENT WHICH ABUTS ALL NEW PAVEMENTS TO PROVIDE A STRAIGHT VERTICAL EDGE. 11.PROTECT BY WHATEVER MEANS REQUIRED ALL FENCES, SIGNS, STRUCTURES, DRIVES, SIDEWALKS, STREETS, BUSHES, TREES, ETC. WHICH ARE NOT DESIGNATED FOR REMOVAL, OR OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION. 12.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING ALL DAMAGE INCURRED DURING CONSTRUCTION. THIS INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGE CAUSED BY SUBCONTRACTORS TO THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. REPAIRS SHALL EQUAL OR EXCEED THE QUALITY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS. 13.CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND/OR RELOCATE ALL ITEMS NECESSARY TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WHETHER SPECIFICALLY CALLED OUT BY NOTE OR NOT. 14.THE LOCATIONS OF ALL AERIAL AND UNDERGROUND UTILITY FACILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE OR MAY NOT BE INDICATED IN THESE PLANS. UNDERGROUND FACILITIES, WHETHER INDICATED OR NOT, SHALL BE LOCATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, PAVEMENT AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS. ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING UTILITIES AND/OR PAVED STREETS CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF LITTLE CANADA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, LATEST EDITION. 15.ALL DEBRIS AND REFUSE RESULTING FROM CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS SHALL BE HAULED OFF-SITE AND DISPOSED OF PROPERLY AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 16.SALVAGED HYDRANT TO BE RELOCATED PER THE SEWER AND WATER PLANS. SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709 K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-TYPS-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 2:09:12 PMTYPICAL SECTION C1.01SCALE: 1 C1.01 TYPICAL PUBLIC STREET SECTION NOT TO SCALE SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709 SCHEDULE OF STORM STRUCTURES STRUCTURE NUMBER CB-1 CB-1A CB-2 CB-3 CB-4 CB-4A CB-5 CB-6 CB-6A CB-6B CB-6C CB-6D CB-6E CB-6F CB-7 CB-8 CB-9 CB-10 CB-11 CB-12 CB-13 CB-14 CB-15 CB-16 CB-17 FRAME AND GRATE R-4342 R-4342 R-3067-V R-3067-VB R-4342 R-3067-V R-3067-VB R-3067-VB R-4342 R-4342 R-4342 R-4342 R-4342 R-4342 R-3067-V R-3067-VB R-4342 R-3067-V R-3067-V R-3067-VB R-3067-V R-3067-VB R-4342 R-4342 R-4342 STRUCTURE TYPE 48" DIA CBMH MNDOT DESIGN N 48" DIA CBMH 48" DIA CBMH 48" DIA CBMH 72" DIA CBMH 60" DIA CBMH 48" DIA CBMH 48" DIA CBMH MNDOT DESIGN N MNDOT DESIGN N MNDOT DESIGN N MNDOT DESIGN N MNDOT DESIGN N 48" DIA CBMH 2'x3' CB MNDOT DESIGN N 48" DIA CBMH 48" DIA CBMH 60" DIA CBMH 2'x3' CB 48" DIA CBMH 48" DIA CBMH MNDOT DESIGN N MNDOT DESIGN N DESIGN STRUCTURE DETAILS TOP OF CASTING 806.89 INLET 12" N: 803.80 INVERT 12" E: 803.80 TOP OF CASTING 807.09 INVERT 12" S: 804.09 TOP OF CASTING 808.17 INLET 12" W: 803.10 INVERT 12" E: 803.10 TOP OF CASTING 808.17 INLET 12" W: 802.95 INVERT 12" E: 802.95 TOP OF CASTING 805.58 INLET 12" S: 801.74 INVERT 12" N: 801.74 TOP OF CASTING 807.60 INLET 30" E: 795.32 INVERT 30" N: 795.32 TOP OF CASTING 806.86 INLET 15" W: 802.06 INVERT 18" N: 801.91 TOP OF CASTING 806.86 INLET 12" W: 802.36 INVERT 15" E: 802.21 TOP OF CASTING 807.03 INLET 12" N: 803.24 INLET 12" S: 803.24 INVERT 12" E: 803.24 TOP OF CASTING 806.95 INLET 12" N: 803.50 INVERT 12" S: 803.50 TOP OF CASTING 806.43 INVERT 12" S: 803.74 TOP OF CASTING 807.18 INLET 12" S: 803.48 INVERT 12" N: 803.48 TOP OF CASTING 807.18 INLET 12" S: 803.72 INVERT 12" N: 803.72 TOP OF CASTING 806.77 INVERT 12" N: 803.96 TOP OF CASTING 807.50 INLET 18" W: 801.38 INLET 12" N: 803.37 INVERT 18" E: 801.38 TOP OF CASTING 807.63 INVERT 12" S: 803.63 TOP OF CASTING 807.69 INVERT 12" N: 804.45 TOP OF CASTING 808.05 INLET 18" W: 800.85 INLET 12" S: 804.01 INVERT 18" E: 800.85 TOP OF CASTING 806.85 INLET 18" W: 799.90 INVERT 18" E: 799.90 TOP OF CASTING 806.25 INLET 15" NW: 800.42 INLET 18" W: 799.34 INLET 12" NE: 799.84 INVERT 24" SE: 798.84 TOP OF CASTING 806.90 INVERT 12" SW: 803.00 TOP OF CASTING 806.25 INLET 12" NW: 800.97 INVERT 15" SE: 800.72 TOP OF CASTING 805.69 INLET 12" W: 801.84 INLET 12" NE: 801.84 INVERT 12" S: 801.74 TOP OF CASTING 806.59 INVERT 12" SW: 802.90 TOP OF CASTING 805.22 INVERT 12" E: 802.22 AS-BUILT STRUCTURE DETAILS STANDARD DETAIL SCHEDULE OF STORM STRUCTURES STRUCTURE NUMBER CB-18 CB-19 CB-20 CB-21 CB-22 CB-23 CB-24 CB-24A CB-25 CB-26 CB-27 CB-28 CB-29 CB-30 CB-30A CB-31 CB-32 CB-33 CB-34 CB-35 CB-113 CB-114 CB-115 CB-116 CB-120 FRAME AND GRATE R-3067-V R-3067-V R-3067-V R-3067-V R-3067-VB R-3067-VB R-3067-V R-3067-V R-3067-VB R-3067-VB R-3067-V R-3067-VB R-3067-V R-4342 R-4342 R-4342 R-4342 R-4342 R-4342 R-4342 R-4342 R-4342 R-3067-VB R-3067-VB R-4342 STRUCTURE TYPE 72" DIA CBMH 60" DIA CBMH 2'x3' CB 48" DIA CBMH 60" DIA CBMH 2'x3' CB 60" DIA CBMH 48" DIA CBMH 48" DIA CBMH 2'x3' CB 48" DIA CBMH 2'x3' CB 48" DIA CBMH MNDOT DESIGN N MNDOT DESIGN N MNDOT DESIGN N 48" DIA CBMH 48" DIA CBMH 48" DIA CBMH MNDOT DESIGN N 48" DIA CBMH MNDOT DESIGN N 2'x3' CB 48" DIA CBMH 48" DIA CBMH DESIGN STRUCTURE DETAILS TOP OF CASTING 808.76 INLET 24" W: 797.25 INLET 30" S: 794.53 INVERT 30" N: 794.53 TOP OF CASTING 809.34 INLET 30" S: 794.14 INLET 12" W: 805.10 INVERT 30" N: 794.14 TOP OF CASTING 809.26 INVERT 12" E: 805.26 TOP OF CASTING 807.29 INLET 24" W: 798.19 INLET 12" N: 801.10 INVERT 24" E: 798.09 TOP OF CASTING 806.30 INLET 21" NW: 799.15 INLET 12" N: 802.15 INVERT 24" E: 798.90 TOP OF CASTING 806.30 INVERT 12" S: 802.30 TOP OF CASTING 807.25 INLET 18" NW: 800.17 INLET 12" S: 800.92 INVERT 21" SE: 799.92 TOP OF CASTING 807.64 INLET 18" W: 800.68 INVERT 18" SE: 800.58 TOP OF CASTING 807.60 INLET 12" N: 803.39 INLET 18" W: 800.99 INVERT 18" E: 800.89 TOP OF CASTING 807.54 INVERT 12" S: 803.54 TOP OF CASTING 807.79 INLET 15" W: 801.65 INLET 12" N: 803.80 INVERT 18" E: 801.40 TOP OF CASTING 807.73 INVERT 12" S: 804.04 TOP OF CASTING 809.26 INLET 12" S: 802.56 INLET 12" N: 802.56 INVERT 15" E: 802.31 TOP OF CASTING 806.10 INLET 12" S: 802.92 INVERT 12" N: 802.92 TOP OF CASTING 806.15 INVERT 12" N: 803.41 TOP OF CASTING 806.56 INVERT 12" S: 803.49 TOP OF CASTING 806.06 INLET 12" NW: 801.67 INVERT 12" S: 801.57 TOP OF CASTING 806.02 INLET 12" W: 801.96 INVERT 12" SE: 801.86 TOP OF CASTING 805.90 INLET 12" NW: 802.23 INVERT 12" E: 802.13 TOP OF CASTING 805.67 INVERT 12" SE: 802.67 TOP OF CASTING 806.35 INLET 12" S: 802.35 INLET 12" W: 802.35 INVERT 12" N: 802.25 TOP OF CASTING 806.20 INVERT 12" N: 803.20 TOP OF CASTING 806.98 INVERT 12" E: 803.48 TOP OF CASTING 806.93 INLET 12" W: 803.32 INVERT 12" E: 803.22 TOP OF CASTING 803.44 INLET 15" W: 799.04 INVERT 15" NE: 799.04 AS-BUILT STRUCTURE DETAILS STANDARD DETAIL SCHEDULE OF STORM STRUCTURES STRUCTURE NUMBER CB-121 CB-122 CB-127 FES-2 FES-4 FES-17 MH-1 MH-3 MH-5 MH-27 FRAME AND GRATE R-4342 R-4342 R-4342 ??? ??? ??? R-1678-A R-1678-A R-1678-A R-1678-A STRUCTURE TYPE 48" DIA CBMH 48" DIA CBMH 48" DIA CBMH 30" FES 24" FES 15" FES 48" DIA MH 48" DIA MH 72" DIA MH 48" DIA MH DESIGN STRUCTURE DETAILS TOP OF CASTING 803.08 INLET 15" W: 799.49 INVERT 15" E: 799.49 TOP OF CASTING 804.69 INLET 12" W: 800.58 INVERT 15" E: 800.33 TOP OF CASTING 806.48 INLET 12" S: 800.93 INVERT 12" E: 800.93 TOP OF CASTING 795.88 INLET 30" SW: 793.00 TOP OF CASTING 800.33 INLET 24" NW: 798.00 TOP OF CASTING 799.52 INLET 15" SW: 798.00 TOP OF CASTING 807.74 INLET 18" S: 801.51 INVERT 18" E: 801.51 TOP OF CASTING 808.13 INLET 12" N: 801.37 INVERT 12" SE: 801.27 TOP OF CASTING 806.06 INLET 30" S: 796.04 INVERT 30" W: 796.04 TOP OF CASTING 808.25 INLET 12" W: 802.41 INVERT 12" N: 802.41 AS-BUILT STRUCTURE DETAILS STANDARD DETAIL STO-9 MNDOT 4003B STO-9 MNDOT 4003B STO-9 STO-7 STO-9 STO-9 STO-5 STO-5 STO-9 STO-7 STO-1 STO-9 STO-7 STO-5 STO-7 STO-9 STO-11 STO-4 STO-5 STO-5 STO-7 STO-7 STO-5 STO-9 STO-1 STO-4 STO-5 STO-9 STO-7 SCHEDULE OF STORM SUMP STRUCTURES STRUCTURE NUMBER MH-2 MH-6 OCS-1 OCS-1A FRAME AND GRATE R-1678-A R-1678-A R-1678-A R-1678-A STRUCTURE TYPE 48" DIA MH 60" DIA MH 84" DIA MH 72" DIA MH DESIGN STRUCTURE DETAILS TOP OF CASTING 803.37 INLET 24" NW: 798.14 INLET 15" SW: 798.70 INVERT 24" SE: 798.14 SUMP 794.14 TOP OF CASTING 811.08 INLET 30" S: 793.54 INVERT 30" NE: 793.54 SUMP 789.54 TOP OF CASTING 806.06 INVERT 30" N: 796.37 SUMP 793.50 TOP OF CASTING 800.60 INVERT 15" NE: 798.00 SUMP 795.00 AS-BUILT STRUCTURE DETAILS STANDARD DETAIL MNDOT 4003B MNDOT 4003B STO-9 MNDOT 4003B STO-9 MNDOT 4003B STO-9 STO-17 STO-23 STO-11 STO-11 STO-1 STO-1 STO-5 STO-5 STO-5 STO-5 STO-5 STO-5 STO-5 STO-5 STO-5 STO-5 STO-5 STO-9 STO-9 MNDOT 4003B STO-9 MNDOT 4003B STO-9 STO-9 STO-9 STO-9 STO-9 STO-9 MNDOT 4003B STO-9 MNDOT 4003B STO-9 MNDOT 4003B STO-9 MNDOT 4003B STO-9 MNDOT 4003B STO-9 K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-TYPS-PLAN.dwg 2/3/2025 3:53:07 PMSTORM STRUCTURE TABLE C1.02 SCALE: 1 C1.02 SCHEDULE OF STORM STRUCTURES NOT TO SCALE 1.SEE DETAIL STR-13 FOR CURB INLET RIM NOTES. 2.CURB INLET STATION AND OFFSET IS BASED ON BACK OF CURB / CENTER OF BACK OF CASTING. RIM ELEVATION IS FLOWLINE ELEVATION OF CASTING. GENERAL NOTES: SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709 SAN-2 SCHEDULE OF SANITARY STRUCTURES STRUCTURE NUMBER MH 26 MH 27 MH 28 MH 29 MH 30 MH 47 MH 49 MH 51 MH 52 MH 53 MH 55 MH 56 MH 57 MH 58 MH 59 MH 60 MH 60A MH 61 MH 62 MH 63 MH 64 STRUCTURE TYPE F&I 48" MH - R-1642-B F&I 48" MH - R-1642-B F&I 48" MH - R-1642-B F&I 48" MH - R-1642-B F&I 48" MH - R-1642-B F&I 48" MH - R-1642-B F&I 48" MH - R-1642-B F&I 48" MH - R-1642-B F&I 48" MH - R-1642-B F&I 48" MH - R-1642-B F&I 48" MH - R-1642-B F&I 48" MH - R-1642-B F&I 48" MH - R-1642-B F&I 48" MH - R-1642-B F&I 48" MH - R-1642-B F&I 48" MH - R-1642-B F&I 48" MH - R-1642-B F&I 48" MH - R-1642-B F&I 48" MH - R-1642-B F&I 48" MH - R-1642-B F&I 48" MH - R-1642-B DESIGN STRUCTURE DETAILS TOP OF CASTING 808.19 INLET 8" S: 793.81 INLET 8" E: 793.81 INVERT 8" N: 793.71 TOP OF CASTING 808.50 INLET 8" S: 794.91 INVERT 8" N: 794.81 TOP OF CASTING 808.08 INLET 8" S: 795.86 INVERT 8" N: 795.76 TOP OF CASTING 808.53 INLET 8" S: 796.87 INVERT 8" N: 796.77 TOP OF CASTING 808.90 INVERT 8" N: 797.77 TOP OF CASTING 810.01 INLET 8" SE: 792.08 INVERT 8" N: 791.98 TOP OF CASTING 810.84 INLET 8" SE: 792.61 INVERT 8" NW: 792.51 TOP OF CASTING 811.33 INLET 8" SE: 793.13 INVERT 8" NW: 793.03 TOP OF CASTING 810.81 INLET 8" S: 793.56 INVERT 8" NW: 793.46 TOP OF CASTING 810.19 INLET 8" S: 793.99 INVERT 8" N: 793.89 TOP OF CASTING 808.45 INLET 8" S: 795.03 INVERT 8" N: 794.93 TOP OF CASTING 808.03 INLET 8" SW: 795.35 INVERT 8" N: 795.25 TOP OF CASTING 807.45 INLET 8" SW: 795.76 INVERT 8" NE: 795.66 TOP OF CASTING 806.89 INLET 8" W: 796.34 INVERT 8" NE: 796.24 TOP OF CASTING 807.34 INLET 8" W: 796.72 INVERT 8" E: 796.62 TOP OF CASTING 808.24 INLET 8" E: 794.71 INVERT 8" W: 794.61 TOP OF CASTING 807.97 INLET 8" SE: 795.17 INVERT 8" W: 795.07 TOP OF CASTING 808.65 INVERT 8" E: 797.54 TOP OF CASTING 807.08 INLET 8" SE: 795.74 INVERT 8" NW: 795.64 TOP OF CASTING 806.93 INLET 8" E: 796.08 INVERT 8" NW: 795.98 TOP OF CASTING 807.52 INVERT 8" W: 796.40 AS-BUILT STANDARD DETAILS STANDARD DETAIL SAN-1 SAN-1 SAN-1 SAN-1 SAN-1 SAN-1 SAN-1 SAN-1 SAN-1 SAN-1 SAN-1 SAN-1 SAN-1 SAN-1 SAN-1 SAN-1 SAN-1 SAN-1 SAN-1 SAN-1 K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-TYPS-PLAN.dwg 2/3/2025 3:54:13 PMSANITARY STRUCTURE TABLE C1.03 SCALE: 1 C1.03 SCHEDULE OF SANITARY STRUCTURES NOT TO SCALE SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709 K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-TYPS-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 2:09:28 PMSANITARY STRUCTURE TABLE C1.04 SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709 ST-8 SB TETETETETETETETETETETETETETETETETETESB SB CDE CDE CDECDECDE CDECDESB ST-8 ST-11ST-10 ST-13 ST-12 SB SBSB SB SB ST-9SB ST-7SB 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14151617 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 2345 15 16 10 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 7 5 12 OUTLOT B BASIN 2 OUTLOT D BASIN 1 OUTLOT A MB ||| || ||| MB ||| || ||| 1 108TH ST S HENSLOWE AVE SHEMINGWAY AVE S110TH ST S 109TH ST S HEMINGWAY AVE SHENSLOWE AVE SK:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000 CP-SITE-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 2:10:30 PMC2.01 OVERALL SITE PLAN N FEET 0 H: INSCALE 80 160 LEGEND PROPERTY LINE LOT LINE ROW CENTERLINE DRAINAGE / UTILITY EASEMENT BUILDING SETBACK LINE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER BLOCK NUMBER LOT NUMBER BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK BITUMINOUS TRAIL 15 5 SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709 TETETETETETETETETETETETETETETESB ST-11 ST-10 SBSB ST-9 SB 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 54 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 4 5 6 2 3 4 5 5 BASIN 2 OUTLOT D HENSLOWE AVE S109TH ST S APPROXIMATE BUILDING LOCATION (TYPICAL)HEMINGWAY AVE SOUTLOT AK:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000 CP-SITE-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 2:10:43 PMC2.02 SITE PLAN - NORTH N FEET 0 H: INSCALE 40 80 LEGEND PROPERTY LINE LOT LINE ROW CENTERLINE DRAINAGE / UTILITY EASEMENT BUILDING SETBACK LINE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER BLOCK NUMBER LOT NUMBER BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK BITUMINOUS TRAIL 15 5 MATCHLINE SEE SHEET -C2.03 SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709 TETETETETETETETETETETETETETETETETEST-11 ST-10 ST-13 ST-12 SBSB SB SB 1 2 3 4 5 6 5 6 7 8 9 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 3 4 9 10 12 13 14151617 1 2345 10 7 8 1 2 3 1 5 6 6 7 12 OUTLOT B BASIN 1 OUTLOT A MB ||||||| | ||| |||||| OH MB ||||||| | ||| |||||| OH 110TH ST SHEMINGWAY AVE SHENSLOWE AVE S K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000 CP-SITE-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 2:10:59 PMC2.03 SITE PLAN - SOUTH N FEET 0 H: INSCALE 40 80 LEGEND PROPERTY LINE LOT LINE ROW CENTERLINE DRAINAGE / UTILITY EASEMENT BUILDING SETBACK LINE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER BLOCK NUMBER LOT NUMBER BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK BITUMINOUS TRAIL 15 5 MATCHLINE SEE SHEET -C2.02 SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709 ST-8 SB TETETETETETETETETETETETETETETETETETETEST-8 ST-11ST-10 ST-13 ST-12 SB SBSB SB SB ST-9SB ST-7SB 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 7 MBXX||||| ||| 804 80 6 808806802800798 794 788 8108088 0 6 80 0 7 9 4 79 6 79 8 80 2808808808 810808808808 808810808 80881080881081 0 810 810 80880880 8 808 808 8 0 8 808 8 0 8 81 0 81 2 810812812810 808 8088 0 8 806MBXX||||| ||| MBXX||||| ||| MBXX||||| |||SSS S SS>>>>>>HEMINGWAY AVE SHENSLOWE AVE S 110TH STREET S S SS S>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> BASIN 1 OUTLOT A800800800798798798802804 806 808 808 808 808808808810 8088088108108 0 8 808 810810810810810808808810 810808 808810 806804802804802800796 794 808806804802 810 109TH ST SHENSLOWE AVE S1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14151617 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011 12 13 14 1 2345 15 16 10 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 5 12 810 8108108068088 0 8 8068 0 6 808808 808 BASIN 2 OUTLOT D 81 0 80 4 80 6 80 8 792794794796796K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-GRAD-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 2:58:44 PMC3.01 OVERALL GRADING PLAN LEGEND EXISTING CONTOUR (MAJOR)810 EXISTING CONTOUR (MINOR)799 PROPOSED CONTOUR (MAJOR)810 PROPOSED CONTOUR (MINOR)799 PROPOSED DRAINAGE STRUCTURE PROPOSED STORM SEWER PIPE>> PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MAIN> PROPOSED SANITARY STRUCTURES PROPOSED WATER MAIN|| ST-1 SOIL BORING LOCATION AND IDENTIFICATION 15 5 BLOCK NUMBER LOT NUMBER 1.MASS GRADING OF SITE PERFORMED UNDER SEPARATE CONTRACT GENERAL NOTES: SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709N FEET 0 H: INSCALE 80 160 TETETETETETETETETETETETETETETETEST-11 ST-10 SBSB ST-9 SB 2 3 4 5 7 07.91 08.19 08.64 09.08 09.21 08.28 10.31 07.88 LP 06.56 LP 06.30 LP 06.86 09.56 06.99LP 05.7407.0007.91 08.17 08.62 09.07 08.65 08.60 08.44 08.02 07.57 07.32 09.22 10.58 11.62 11.09 10.72 10.35 09.97 06.44 HP 07.04 LP 05.54 06.87 06.74 HP 08.02 09.45 06.82 LP 05.67 HP 07.17 LP 05.90 LP 06.02 LP 06.06 EOF 08.22 10.66 11.00 05.18 05.11 05.2410.26 09.81 05.26 06.3509.36 08.91 06.18 08.52 09.03 09.05 08.1607.63 07.26 07.34 08.10 LP 06.35 08.02 07.92 08.25 HP 07.85 08.70 LP 06.20 07.40 07.55 09.12 07.10 HP 07.19 05.79 06.55 06.59 LP 05.69 08.72 09.0807.03 LP 06.15 08.64 HP 07.35 08.19 07.91LP 06.10 10.23 07.99 EOF 09.01 HP 09.29 HP 09.70 HP 10.18 HP 10.31 10.20 EOF 09.00 HP 09.74 HP 10.1809.38 08.94 08.55 HP 09.32 08.21 09.51 09.38 08.94 08.49 08.21 07.81 EOF 08.82 HP 09.21 08.48 08.94 HP 09.72 HP 10.17 HP 09.69 08.90 HP 09.56 08.77 08.34 HP 09.14 HP 08.67 07.87 EOF 08.32 07.54 HP 11.66 08.41 HP 11.27 08.09 08.29 HP 12.20 HP 11.84 11.13 HP 11.46 10.67 HP 11.08 10.29 HP 11.78 07.30 HP 11.36 06.90 06.56 HP 10.91 HP 10.46 09.66 HP 10.01 09.21 08.83 HP 09.63 EOF 07.76 HP 07.64 09.42HP 10.22 HP 09.80 09.00 HP 09.15 08.55 HP 09.00 08.22 HP 09.30 08.50 HP 08.42 07.62 HP 08.73 07.93 HP 10.16 HP 08.15 LP 05.23 HP 09.29 HP 07.00 HP 06.71 EOF 05.41 01.00 03.00 HP 07.63 08.06 2.5%2.0%2.6% 2 . 2% 2. 5 % 2. 5 %3.0%2.7%2.0%5.8%2.5%2.0%5.5%2.5%2.5%4.3%2.4%2.0%2.7%2.2%2.2%2.5%T.F. 810.55 60' FB SE/LO T.F. 810.40 60' FB SE/LO T.F. 811.20 60' FB SE/LO LFE 812.55 60' FB SE/LO T.F. 810.30 60' FB SE/LO LFE 811.2060' FB SE/LOLFE 810.3060' FB SE/LOLFE 810.3060' FB SE/LOLFE 809.8060' FB SE/LOLFE 810.3060' FB S E / L O LFE 81 2 . 6 0 60' F B S E/ L O LFE 8 1 3. 0 0 60' FB SE/LOLFE 809.8560' FB SE/LOLFE 809.8560' FB/LO SE/WO T.F. 813.80 60' FB/LO SE/WO T.F. 812.10 60' FB/LO SE/WO T.F. 812.40 60' FB/LO SE/WO T.F. 812. 8 0 60' FB SE/LO T.F. 810.80 60' FB SE/LO T.F. 811.20 60' FB SE/LOT.F. 810.9060' FB SE/LO LFE 810.10 60' FB SE/LO LFE 810.40 60' FB SE/LO LFE 810.85 60' FB SE/LO LFE 811.25 60' FB SE/LO 60' FB SE/LOT.F. 810.6060' FB SE/LOT.F. 810.20GF 810.22GF 810.07GF 810.87GF 810.92GF 810.92GF 810.52GF 810.07GF 809.77GF 810.57GF 810.07GF 809.97GF 8 1 0 . 5 7 G F 8 1 0 . 2 7 G F 8 0 9 . 8 7 G F 8 0 9 . 5 2 GF 809.52 GF 812.47GF 812 .67GF 812 .27GF 812.22GF 809.47 GF 809.97 GF 809.97 GF 809.97 GF 810.87GF 810.77GF 811.17GF 811.77GF 812.07GF 812.47LO 810.55LO 810.40LO 811.20LO 812.55LO 812.60LO 813 .00LO 809.30LO 809.85 L O 8 0 9 . 8 5 L O 8 1 0 . 2 0 L O 8 1 0 . 6 0 LO 8 1 0 . 9 0 LO 811.25LO 811.25LO 810.85LO 810.40LO 810.10LO 810.30 LO 810.30 LO 809.80 LO 810.30 LO 811.20LO 809.85LO 811.10LO 811.50LO 807.60LO 807.90LO 808.30LO 811.20LO 810.80LO 810.30LAG 812 .50 60' FB/LO SE/WO T.F. 812.80GF 812.30LO 808.3060' FB SE/LO LFE 811.20 GF 810.87LO 811.2060' FB SE/LO T.F. 810.55 GF 810.22LO 810.5565' FB SE/LO T.F. 811.10 65' FB SE/LO T.F. 811.5060' FB/L O SE/W O T.F. 813.80GF 8 1 2 . 4 7 LO 8 0 9 . 3 060' FB/LOSE/WOT.F. 813.80G F 8 1 2 . 4 7 L O 8 0 9 . 3 060' FB/LO SE/WO T.F. 813.80GF 8 1 2 . 4 7 LO 8 0 9 . 3 0 40' DE 20' DE 40' DE 20' DE 20' DE 20' D E 20' DELAG 810.05LAG 809.90LAG 810.70LAG 810.05LAG 810.70LAG 810.30LAG 809.80LAG 812.10LAG 808.80LAG 809.35 L A G 8 1 0 . 1 0 LA G 8 0 9 . 7 0 L A G 8 0 9 . 3 5 LAG 8 1 0 . 4 0 LAG 8 0 8 . 8 0 L A G 8 0 8 . 8 0 L AG 8 0 8 . 8 0 LAG 810.75LAG 810.75LAG 810.35LAG 809.90LAG 809.60LAG 809.80 LAG 809.35LAG 810.70LAG 809.80 LAG 809.30 LAG 09.80 LAG 810.70LAG 810.60LAG 811.00LAG 807.10LAG 807.40LAG 807.80LAG 807.802.5%3. 0 % 4.2% 4.3% 5.3% 8.9% 6.6% 8.0% 8.4% 8.1% 8.7% 8.1% 7.9% 6.5% 9.7% 8.5% 8.5%5.9%4.6%3.9% 8.5%7.6%7.6%8.3%8.0%8.0%8.0% 7.9% 7.8% 8.1% 8.2% 7.9% 6.8% 7.1% 7.2%8.3%8.3%9.7%7.1%SUBJECT TO EASEMENT AQUISITION 2.0%2.00%2.00%2.0%2.0%4.9%2.00% 3.14% 5.23%2.50%4.05%3.87%2.51% 2.00%LAG 812.05HP 09.26 804 8 0 0 8 1 0 7947 9 6 7 9 8 8 0 2 8 0 4 8 0 6 8 0 8 808 808810808808808 808810808 80881080881081 0 810 810 80880880 8 808 808 8 0 8 808 8 0 8 81 0 81 2 810 812812810 808 8088 0 8 806SSS >>>>>72+0073+0074+0075+0076 + 0 0 7 7 + 0 078+0079+0092+00 93+00 94+00 95+0 0 96 + 0 0 97+ 0 0 98+00 99+00 100+00 37+0038+0039+0040+0041+0042+0043+00HENSLOWE AVE S109TH ST S 109TH STREET S.109TH STREET S. STA: 90+69.19 BASIN 2 Q100 HWL = 799.21 BACK TO BACK Q100 = 803.23 ADJACENT FREEBOARD = HIGHER OF 2' ABOVE B2B OR 5' ABOVE Q100 (805.23) INFILTRATION BENCH BOTTOM = 793.00 S SS S>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> 60' FB SE/LO T.F. 811.35 LO 811.35GF 810.9460' FB SE/LO T.F. 811.35 LO 811.35GF 810.95LAG 810.85LAG 810.85LO 811.20 60' FB SE/LO T.F. 811.20 GF 810.87 LAG 810.70 60' FB SE/LO T.F. 811.30 LO 811.30GF 810.96LAG 810.8060' FB SE/LO T.F. 810.75 LO 810.75GF 810.41LAG 810.2560' FB SE/LO T.F. 810.40 LO 810.40GF 810.06LAG 809.9060' FB SE/LO T.F. 810.20 LO 810.20GF 809.86LAG 809.7060' FB SE/LO T.F. 811.25 LO 811.25GF 810.91LAG 810.7560' FB SE/LO T.F. 810.40 60' FB SE/LO T.F. 811.20 60' FB SE/LO LFE 812.55 60' FB SE/LO T.F. 810.30 60' FB SE/LO LFE 811.2060' FB SE/LOLFE 810.3060' FB SE/LOLFE 810.3060' FB SE/LOLFE 809.8060' FB SE/LOLFE 810.3060' FB S E / L O LFE 81 2 . 6 0 60' F B S E/ L O LFE 8 1 3. 0 0 60' FB SE/LOLFE 809.8560' FB SE/LOLFE 809.8560' FB/LO SE/WO T.F. 813.80 60' FB/LO SE/WO T.F. 812.10 60' FB/LO SE/WO T.F. 812.40 60' FB/LO SE/WO T.F. 812. 8 0 60' FB SE/LO T.F. 810.80 60' FB SE/LO T.F. 811.20 60' FB SE/LOT.F. 810.9060' FB SE/LO LFE 810.10 60' FB SE/LO LFE 810.40 60' FB SE/LO LFE 810.85 60' FB SE/LO LFE 811.25 60' FB SE/LO 60' FB SE/LOT.F. 810.6060' FB SE/LOT.F. 810.20GF 810.07GF 810.87GF 810.92GF 810.92GF 810.52GF 810.07GF 809.77GF 810.57GF 810.07GF 809.97GF 8 1 0 . 5 7 G F 8 1 0 . 2 7 G F 8 0 9 . 8 7 G F 8 0 9 . 5 2 GF 809.52 GF 812.47GF 812 .67GF 812 .27GF 812.22GF 809.47 GF 809.97 GF 809.97 GF 809.97 GF 810.87GF 810.77GF 811.17GF 811.77GF 812.07GF 812.47LO 810.40LO 811.20LO 812.55LO 812.60LO 813 .00LO 809.30LO 809.85 L O 8 0 9 . 8 5 L O 8 1 0 . 2 0 L O 8 1 0 . 6 0 LO 8 1 0 . 9 0 LO 811.25LO 811.25LO 810.85LO 810.40LO 810.10LO 810.30 LO 810.30 LO 809.80 LO 810.30 LO 811.20LO 809.85LO 811.10LO 811.50LO 807.60LO 807.90LO 808.30LO 811.20LO 810.80LO 810.30LAG 812 .50 60' FB/LO SE/WO T.F. 812.80GF 812.30LO 808.3060' FB SE/LO LFE 811.20 GF 810.87LO 811.2060' FB SE/LO T.F. 810.55 GF 810.22LO 810.5565' FB SE/LO T.F. 811.10 65' FB SE/LO T.F. 811.5060' FB/L O SE/W O T.F. 813.80GF 8 1 2 . 4 7 LO 8 0 9 . 3 060' FB/LOSE/WOT.F. 813.80G F 8 1 2 . 4 7 L O 8 0 9 . 3 060' FB/LO SE/WO T.F. 813.80GF 8 1 2 . 4 7 LO 8 0 9 . 3 0LAG 809.90LAG 810.70LAG 810.05LAG 810.70LAG 810.30LAG 809.80LAG 812.10LAG 808.80LAG 809.35 L A G 8 1 0 . 1 0 LA G 8 0 9 . 7 0 L A G 8 0 9 . 3 5 LAG 8 1 0 . 4 0 LAG 8 0 8 . 8 0 L A G 8 0 8 . 8 0 L AG 8 0 8 . 8 0 LAG 810.75LAG 810.75LAG 810.35LAG 809.90LAG 809.60LAG 809.80 LAG 809.35LAG 810.70LAG 809.80 LAG 809.30 LAG 09.80 LAG 810.70LAG 810.60LAG 811.00LAG 807.10LAG 807.40LAG 807.80LAG 807.80LAG 812.057.3% 7.6% 7.4% 7.9% 8.2% 8.5% 7.1%8.8%5.5%810810808808810 810808 808810 806804802804802800HEMINGWAY AVE S1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 2 3 4 5 6 5 810BASIN 2 OUTLOT D K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-GRAD-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 2:13:12 PMC3.02 GRADING PLAN NORTH N FEET 0 H: INSCALE 40'80' LEGEND EXISTING CONTOUR (MAJOR)810 EXISTING CONTOUR (MINOR)799 PROPOSED CONTOUR (MAJOR)810 PROPOSED CONTOUR (MINOR)799 PROPOSED DRAINAGE STRUCTURE PROPOSED STORM SEWER PIPE>> PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MAIN> PROPOSED SANITARY STRUCTURES PROPOSED WATER MAIN|| F.B.FULL BASEMENT FB/LO LOOKOUT FOUNDATION FB/WO WALKOUT FOUNDATION F.F.FINISH FLOOR/TOP OF SLAB L.F.LOW FLOOR - TOP OF FOOTING SE/LO SPLIT ENTRY LOOKOUT SE/WO SPLIT ENTRY WALKOUT SOG SLAB ON GRADE T.F.TOP OF FOUNDATION L.P. LOW POINT H.P. HIGH POINT E.O.F.EMERGENCY OVERFLOW L.A.G. LOWER ADJACENT GRADE SB ST-1 SOIL BORING LOCATION AND IDENTIFICATION 09.75 09.75 EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709MATCHLINE SEE SHEET -C3.03 TETETETETETETETETETETETETETETETETEST-11 ST-10 ST-13 ST-12 SBSB SB SB 1 6 6 7 MBX OH 08.91 06.18 08.52 06.06 04.19 08.17 07.83 04.50 07.47 04.66 04.44 07.18 07.19 04.50 07.40 07.7708.2208.6708.97 07.58 09.72 07.78 08.36 08.13 08.79 09.35 09.79 09.69 08.14 08.98 08.73 08.29 07.84 07.20 08.14 09.03 08.70 LP 06.20 07.40 07.55 09.12 09.15 08.70 07.10 HP 07.19 05.79 06.55 06.59 LP 05.69 LP 07.09 09.71 HP 08.53 09.78 09.33LP 06.77 LP 07.18 08.76 08.10LP 07.18 LP 07.03 07.79 08.14 HP 07.76 HP 07.55 08.58 08.8007.03 HP 08.24 09.18 09.0807.03 08.64 LP 06.89 HP 10.18 HP 10.28 HP 09.91 HP 09.68 HP 09.23 EOF 09.14 HP 09.53 HP 09.98 HP 10.43 HP 10.88 HP 10.6610.18 10.09 09.63 09.19 08.66 08.88 09.11 09.48 09.38 HP 10.01 09.21 08.83 HP 09.63 HP 09.28 08.49 08.15 HP 08.94 HP 08.59 07.80 EOF 08.28 EOF 08.27 07.47 07.50 HP 08.52 07.73 08.09 HP 08.89 HP 09.32 08.5208.97 HP 09.77 10.07 HP 09.16 08.36 HP 09.55 08.87 09.18HP 09.99 HP 10.44 09.64 HP 10.87 10.04 HP 10.76 09.94 HP 10.25 09.20 09.42HP 10.22 HP 09.80 09.00 08.50 07.62 07.93 09.04 HP 09.84 HP 09.39 08.59 08.14 HP 08.94 09.23 HP 10.08 08.55 HP 08.15 LP 05.23 EOF 08.13 HP 09.29 HP 07.70 08.02 LP 05.60 08.25 HP 08.98 06.48 LP 04.69 HP 06.19 LP 03.04 EOF 04.00 EOF 06.99 LP 07.53 HP 04.41 07.28 06.83 03.00 HP 07.63 LP 06.95 LP 06.43 HP 08.00 HP 08.00 HP 07.78 08.44 08.26 5.4%2.0%5.8%2.5%2.0%2.5%2.5%5.0%2.0%2.2% 2.2%2.2% 60' FB SE/LO T.F. 810.20 60' FB SE/LO T.F. 810.60 60' FB SE/LO T.F. 811.00 60' FB SE/LO T.F. 811.50 60' FB SE/LO T.F. 812.00 60' FB SE/LO T.F. 811.80 60' FB SE/LOLFE 811.1060' FB SE/LOT.F. 811.1060' FB SE/LOT.F. 810.8060' FB SE/LOT.F. 810.4060' FB SE/LOT.F. 809.9060' FB SE/LOT.F. 809.6060' FB SE /LOT.F . 809 .60 6 0 ' FB SE / LO T . F . 8 1 0 . 0 0 60 ' F B S E / L O T. F . 8 1 0 . 3 060' FB SE/LOLFE 810.006 0 ' FB SE / LO LFE 8 0 9 . 8 5 65' F B S E / L O T.F. 8 1 0 . 7 5 60' FB SE/LO LFE 811.25 60' FB SE/LO LFE 811.25 60' FB SE/LOLFE 810.9060' FB SE/LOLFE 810.40GF 811.47GF 811.67GF 811.17GF 810.67GF 810.27GF 809.87GF 810.92GF 810.92GF 810.77 GF 810.57 GF 810.07 GF 809.67 GF 8 09.52 GF 810.77 GF 810.47 GF 810.07 GF 809.57 GF 809. 2 7 GF 8 0 9. 2 7 GF 809.67GF 809.97GF 810.77LO 811.80LO 812.00LO 811.50LO 811.00LO 810.60LO 810.20LO 811.25LO 811.25LO 810.30 LO 809.80 LO 810.30 LO 809.8 5 LO 810.00 LO 810.40LO 810.90LO 811.10 LO 811.10 LO 810.80 LO 810.40 LO 809.90 LO 809 . 6 0 LO 8 0 9. 6 0 LO 810.00LO 810.30LO 810.75LO 811.10LAG 810.25GF 810.4260' FB SE/LO LFE 811.20 GF 810.87LO 811.2065' FB SE/LO T.F. 811.10 60' FB SE/LO T.F. 812.00 GF 811.67LO 812.0060' FB SE/LO LFE 811.25 GF 810.92LO 811.2520' DE 20' D E 20' DE 20' DE 20' DE20' DE20' DE 20' DE LAG 810.75LAG 810.75LAG 810.60 LAG 810.40 LAG 809.90 LAG 809.50 LAG 80 9.35 LAG 809.80 LAG 809.30 LAG 09.80 LAG 810.70LAG 810.75LAG 811.30LAG 811.50LAG 811.00LAG 810.70LAG 810.10LAG 809.70LAG 811.50LAG 810.60 LAG 810.30 LAG 809.90 LAG 809.40 LAG 80 9 . 1 0 LAG 8 0 9. 1 0 LAG 809.50LAG 809.80LAG 810.605.3% 4.4% 3.7% 3.3% 3.5% 4.2% 4.7% 4.2% 4.3% 8.4% 7.3% 8.4% 8.2% 8.0% 8.2% 7.3%7.6%8.0%8.2%7.9%8.0%8.0% 6 . 0% 5. 8 % 8.2 % 8.4% 7.9% 6.8% 7.8%7.4%8.2%8.0%7.9%9.3% 7.1%2.00%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%3.7%2.5%2.2%2.0%2.5%2.5%2.5%2.5%3.9%2.0%4.0%2.0%2.0%4.9%2.51% 2.00% MBX OH MBX OH MBX OH ??? 65+00 66+00 67+00 68+00 69+00 70+0 0 71+0072+0030+0031+0032+0033+0034+0035+0036+0037+00HEMINGWAY AVE SHENSLOWE AVE S 110TH STREET S >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>BASIN 1 OUTLOT A 60' FB SE/LO T.F. 811.90 LO 811.90GF 811.57LAG 811.40LO 811.90GF 811.5760' FB SE/LO T.F. 811.90 LO 811.90GF 811.56LAG 811.4060' FB SE/LO T.F. 811.50 LO 811.50GF 811.16LAG 811.0060' FB SE/LO T.F. 811.00 LO 811.00GF 810.67LAG 810.5060' FB SE/LO T.F. 810.60 LO 810.60GF 810.26LAG 810.1060' FB SE/LO T.F. 810.35 LO 810.35GF 810.02LAG 809.8560' FB SE/LO T.F. 810.80 LO 810.79GF 810.47LAG 810.3060' FB SE/LO T.F. 811.30 LO 811.30GF 810.96LAG 810.8060' FB SE/LO T.F. 811.30 LO 811.30GF 810.96LAG 810.8060' FB SE/LO T.F. 811.25 LO 811.25GF 810.91LAG 810.75LAG 811.4060' FB SE/LO T.F. 811.90 60' FB SE/LO T.F. 810.20 60' FB SE/LO T.F. 810.60 60' FB SE/LO T.F. 811.00 60' FB SE/LO T.F. 811.50 60' FB SE/LO T.F. 812.00 60' FB SE/LO T.F. 811.80 60' FB SE/LOLFE 811.1060' FB SE/LOT.F. 811.1060' FB SE/LOT.F. 810.8060' FB SE/LOT.F. 810.4060' FB SE/LOT.F. 809.9060' FB SE/LOT.F. 809.6060' FB SE /LOT.F . 809 .60 6 0 ' FB SE / LO T . F . 8 1 0 . 0 0 60 ' F B S E / L O T. F . 8 1 0 . 3 060' FB SE/LOLFE 810.006 0 ' FB SE / LO LFE 8 0 9 . 8 5 65' F B S E / L O T.F. 8 1 0 . 7 5 60' FB SE/LO LFE 811.25 60' FB SE/LO LFE 811.25 60' FB SE/LOLFE 810.9060' FB SE/LOLFE 810.40GF 811.47GF 811.67GF 811.17GF 810.67GF 810.27GF 809.87GF 810.92GF 810.92GF 810.77 GF 810.57 GF 810.07 GF 809.67 GF 8 09.52 GF 810.77 GF 810.47 GF 810.07 GF 809.57 GF 809. 2 7 GF 8 0 9. 2 7 GF 809.67GF 809.97GF 810.77LO 811.80LO 812.00LO 811.50LO 811.00LO 810.60LO 810.20LO 811.25LO 811.25LO 810.30 LO 809.80 LO 810.30 LO 809.8 5 LO 810.00 LO 810.40LO 810.90LO 811.10 LO 811.10 LO 810.80 LO 810.40 LO 809.90 LO 809 . 6 0 LO 8 0 9. 6 0 LO 810.00LO 810.30LO 810.75LO 811.10LAG 810.25GF 810.4260' FB SE/LO LFE 811.20 GF 810.87LO 811.2065' FB SE/LO T.F. 811.10 60' FB SE/LO T.F. 812.00 GF 811.67LO 812.0060' FB SE/LO LFE 811.25 GF 810.92LO 811.25LAG 810.75LAG 810.75LAG 810.60 LAG 810.40 LAG 809.90 LAG 809.50 LAG 80 9.35 LAG 809.80 LAG 809.30 LAG 09.80 LAG 810.70LAG 810.75LAG 811.30LAG 811.50LAG 811.00LAG 810.70LAG 810.10LAG 809.70LAG 811.50LAG 810.60 LAG 810.30 LAG 809.90 LAG 809.40 LAG 80 9 . 1 0 LAG 8 0 9. 1 0 LAG 809.50LAG 809.80LAG 810.608.5% 7.1% 7.5% 8.2% 7.8% 8.5% 8.1% 8.5% 8.3% 4.6% 7.7%800800800798798798802804806 808 808 808 808808808810 8088088108108 0 8 808 810810810810810808796 794 808 806 804 802 810 OUTLOT B BASIN 1 OUTLOT A Q100 HWL = 802.03 BACK TO BACK Q100 =803.37 ADJACENT FREEBOARD = HIGHER OF 2' ABOVE B2B OR 5' ABOVE Q100 (807.03) INFILTRATION BENCH BOTTOM = 798.00 FOREBAY NWL = 798.00 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 7 8 9 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 3 7 8 9 10 12 13 141516 17 1 2 3 45 10 7 8 1 2 3 12 810 8108108068088 0 8 8068 0 6 808808 808 EG 08.49 EG 06.86 EG 05.67 EG 06.35 EG 03.47 MATCHLINE SEE SHEET -C3.02 C3.03 GRADING PLAN SOUTH K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-GRAD-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 2:13:47 PMN FEET 0 H: INSCALE 40'80' LEGEND EXISTING CONTOUR (MAJOR)810 EXISTING CONTOUR (MINOR)799 PROPOSED CONTOUR (MAJOR)810 PROPOSED CONTOUR (MINOR)799 PROPOSED DRAINAGE STRUCTURE PROPOSED STORM SEWER PIPE>> PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MAIN> PROPOSED SANITARY STRUCTURES PROPOSED WATER MAIN|| F.B.FULL BASEMENT FB/LO LOOKOUT FOUNDATION FB/WO WALKOUT FOUNDATION F.F.FINISH FLOOR/TOP OF SLAB L.F.LOW FLOOR - TOP OF FOOTING SE/LO SPLIT ENTRY LOOKOUT SE/WO SPLIT ENTRY WALKOUT SOG SLAB ON GRADE T.F.TOP OF FOUNDATION L.P. LOW POINT H.P. HIGH POINT E.O.F.EMERGENCY OVERFLOW L.A.G. LOWER ADJACENT GRADE SB ST-1 SOIL BORING LOCATION AND IDENTIFICATION 09.75 09.75 EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709 "A" "G" "A" DETAIL 'A' EL = "J" POND SKIMMER GRATE (2) PIECE 5/8" ROD GRATE NOTES: 1. GRATE TO BE MADE IN TWO (2) PIECES 2. ALL METAL SHALL BE HOT-DIPPED GALVANIZED DETAIL B-B POND NWL EL = "I" EL = "D" EL = "F" RCP OUTLET DIA. = "B" EL = "E" NOTE: 1. ALL PIPE JOINTS SHALL BE TIED. SECTION VIEW FLOW SEE DETAIL 'A' PRECAST CONCRETE WEIR 1/4" x 1" FLAT STL. HINGE ASSEMBLY MINIMUM OF 2 HINGES REQUIRED (4) 1/2"Ø-13 UNC HEX HEAD STAINLESS STL. BOLTS WITH NUTS AND WASHERS 5/8" Ø SMOOTH RND. STOCK 4" O.C. BOTH WAYS SEE DETAIL "B-B" 1/2" STL. PLATE SCALE: 1 C3.04 POND SKIMMER STRUCTURE WITH WEIR WALL NO SCALE "K" EL = "L" SKIMMER OPENING (RECTANGULAR) OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE DETAILS I.D.A (IN)B (IN)C D (FT)E (FT)F (FT)G (IN)I (FT)J (FT)K L (FT) OCS-1 84 30 6'X1.5' RECT.795.50 796.37 802.00 12 798.00 799.50 8" (CIRCULAR ORIFICE)802.00 POND NWL EL = "A" INFILTRATION BOTTOM EL = "A" 10-YEAR HWL EL = "B" 100-YEAR HWL EL = "C" BACK-TO-BACK 100-YEAR HWL EL = "D" POND BOTTOM EL = "E" BERM EL = "F" POND TOP EL = "G" STORMWATER BASIN DETAILS I.D.TYPE A B C D E F G BASIN 1 1 798.00 800.04 802.03 803.37 793.00 801.00 804.00 POND TOP EL = "G" INFILTRATION BOTTOM EL = "A" 4:1 10:1 4:1 4:1 4:1 10:1 3:1 4:1 10:1 4:1 8'10' 100-YEAR HWL EL = "C" 10-YEAR HWL EL = "B" OFFLINE INFILTRATION BASIN - TYPE 1 INFILTRATION BASIN - TYPE 2 PRESERVE IN-SITU SANDY SOILS. DO NOT EXCAVATE WITHIN 3' OF FINAL GRADE UNTIL TRIBUTARY HAS BEEN STABILIZED AND TURF ESTABLISHED. SCARIFY 12" UPON FINAL EXCAVATION. PRESERVE IN-SITU SANDY SOILS. DO NOT EXCAVATE WITHIN 3' OF FINAL GRADE UNTIL TRIBUTARY HAS BEEN STABILIZED AND TURF ESTABLISHED. SCARIFY 12" UPON FINAL EXCAVATION. SCALE: 2 C3.04 STORMWATER BASIN TYPICAL SECTION NO SCALE 8'10' NOTE: IF FIELD MEASUREMENTS SHOW THE RESULTING INFILTRATION RATE TO EXCEED 8.3 IN/HOUR, ADJUSTMENTS TO THE INFILTRATION MEDIA WILL BE NECESSARY. EXCAVATE TOP 12" OF IN-SITU SAND AND MIX WITH EXCESS TOPSOIL TO RESULT IN AN APPROXIMATE MEDIA MIX OF 30% TOPSOIL AND 70% ON-SITE SAND. INSTALL THIS MIX BACK INTO BOTTOM OF INFILTRATION AREA. BASIN LINED TO END OF BENCH 2' THICK ON-SITE CLAY 2' SUMP FILL SUMP WITH MORTAR AND COMPLETE INVERT C3.04 STORMWATER BASIN DETAILS K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-GRAD-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 2:13:58 PMSHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709 C3.05 STORMWATER DETAILS K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-GRAD-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 2:14:00 PMSHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE DETAILS I.D.PLATE NO.NWL 10-YR HWL OPENING SIZE PIPE SIZE TOP OF BERM OCS-1A STO-17 798.00 799.77 15"X15"15"801.00 TETETETETETETETETETETETETETEST-9 SB ST-11 ST-10 SBSB ST-9 SB 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 54 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 4 5 6 2 3 4 5 5 BASIN 2 OUTLOT D 23 CY CLASS III RIP RAP SEE DETAIL STO-12 ST STS STST STHENSLOWE AVE S109TH ST SHEMINGWAY AVE S30" CL III RCPK:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-EROS-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 2:14:51 PMC3.06 NORTH RESTORATION PLAN N SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 40 80 LEGEND EXISTING CONTOUR (MAJOR)810 EXISTING CONTOUR (MINOR)799 PROPOSED CONTOUR (MAJOR)810 PROPOSED CONTOUR (MINOR)799 PROPOSED DRAINAGE STRUCTURE PROPOSED STORM SEWER PIPE SB ST-1 SOIL BORING LOCATION AND IDENTIFICATION SF INLET PROTECTION RIP RAP SILT FENCE STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PERMANENT: MnDOT SEED TURFGRASS @200 LBS/ACRE WITH FERTILIZER TYPE 3 @ 350 LBS/ACRE AND HYDRAULIC MULCH TYPE 3884.2.B.2 @ 3000 LBS/ACRE. TEMPORARY: HYDRAULIC MULCH TYPE 3884.2.B.2 @ 2500 LBS/ACRE PERMANENT: MnDOT SEED WET DITCH @20 LBS/ACRE WITH FERTILIZER TYPE 3 @ 350 LBS/ACRE AND EROSION CONTROL BLANKET CATEGORY 20 TEMPORARY: HYDRAULIC MULCH TYPE 3884.2.B.2 @ 2500 LBS/ACRE NOTE: ALL DISTURBED AREAS NOT CALLED OUT FOR RESTORATION TO BE RESTORED WITH MnDOT SEED TURFGRASS @ 200 LBS/ACRE WITH FERTILIZER TYPE 3 @ 350 LBS/ACRE AND HYDRAULIC MULCH TYPE 3884.2.B.2 @ 3000 LBS/ACRE. TEMPORARY: HYDRAULIC MULCH TYPE 3884.2.B.2 @ 2500 LBS/ACRE SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709MATCHLINE STA - SEE SHEET -C3.05 TETETETETETETETETETETETETETETETETEST-11 ST-10 ST-13 ST-12 SBSB SB SB 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 7 8 9 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 3 12 13 14151617 1 2345 10 7 8 1 2 3 1 6 6 7 12 OUTLOT B BASIN 1 OUTLOT A MB ||||||| | ||| |||||| OH SF SFSFSFSF SF SF SFSFSF SF SF SF 16 CY CLASS 3 RIP RAP SEE DETAIL STO-12 20 CY CLASS 3 RIP RAP SEE DETAIL STO-12 110TH ST S HENSLOWE AVE S HEMINGWAY AVE SK:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-EROS-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 2:15:08 PMC3.07 SOUTH RESTORATION PLAN N SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 40 80 LEGEND EXISTING CONTOUR (MAJOR)810 EXISTING CONTOUR (MINOR)799 PROPOSED CONTOUR (MAJOR)810 PROPOSED CONTOUR (MINOR)799 PROPOSED DRAINAGE STRUCTURE PROPOSED STORM SEWER PIPE SB ST-1 SOIL BORING LOCATION AND IDENTIFICATION SF INLET PROTECTION RIP RAP SILT FENCE STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PERMANENT: MnDOT SEED TURFGRASS @200 LBS/ACRE WITH FERTILIZER TYPE 3 @ 350 LBS/ACRE AND HYDRAULIC MULCH TYPE 3884.2.B.2 @ 3000 LBS/ACRE. TEMPORARY: HYDRAULIC MULCH TYPE 3884.2.B.2 @ 2500 LBS/ACRE PERMANENT: MnDOT SEED WET DITCH @20 LBS/ACRE WITH FERTILIZER TYPE 3 @ 350 LBS/ACRE AND EROSION CONTROL BLANKET CATEGORY 20 TEMPORARY: HYDRAULIC MULCH TYPE 3884.2.B.2 @ 2500 LBS/ACRE NOTE: ALL DISTURBED AREAS NOT CALLED OUT FOR RESTORATION TO BE RESTORED WITH MnDOT SEED TURFGRASS @ 200 LBS/ACRE WITH FERTILIZER TYPE 3 @ 350 LBS/ACRE AND HYDRAULIC MULCH TYPE 3884.2.B.2 @ 3000 LBS/ACRE. TEMPORARY: HYDRAULIC MULCH TYPE 3884.2.B.2 @ 2500 LBS/ACREK:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-EROS-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 2:15:08 PMSHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709MATCHLINE STA - SEE SHEET -C3.04 SWPPP C3.08 SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709 SWPPP C3.09 SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709 SWPPP C3.10 SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709 ST-11ST-10ST-13ST-12SBSBSBSBST-9SB1234561234123456789678910111234567891011121314151617123456789101112131412345151610781234561 2 3 4 5 6 6 7 512OUTLOT BBASIN 2OUTLOT DBASIN 1OUTLOT AST-9SBS SSSTST SS S S S S SS S S SSS S SSSS SSSMB||||||||||||OHHENSLOWE AVE S110TH ST S109TH ST SHEMINGWAY AVE S OUTLOT AHENSLOWE AVE SMH 47 MH 49 MH 51 MH 52 MH 53MH 55 MH 56 MH 57 MH 58 MH 59 MH 61 MH 30 MH 29 MH 28 MH 26 MH 60 MH 60A MH 62 MH 63 MH 64 MH 27 CB-31CB-30A CB-30 CB-29 CB-28CB-27 CB-25 CB-24A CB-116 CB-115 CB-26 CB-114 CB-113 CB-24 CB-22 CB-23 CB-35 CB-34 CB-33 CB-32CB-21 CB-18 CB-20 CB-19 MH-6 FES-2 OCS-1 MH-5 CB-4A FES-17OCS-1A CB-17 CB-15 CB-16 MH-3 CB-14 CB-12 MH-2 FES-4 CB-11 CB-9 CB-10 CB-120 CB-121 CB-122 CB-127CB-4MH-27 CB-3 CB-2 CB-1 CB-1A CB-8 CB-7 MH-1 CB-5 CB-6 CB-6F CB-6E CB-6D CB-6A CB-6B CB-6C K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-UTIL-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 2:16:01 PMC4.01 OVERALL UTILITY PLAN LEGEND PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED EASEMENT EXISTING STORM STRUCTURE PROPOSED DRAINAGE STRUCTURE ST EXISTING STORM SEWER PIPE PROPOSED STORM SEWER PIPE PROPOSED DRAIN TILE PIPE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MAIN PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MAIN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER SERVICE EXISTING SANITARY STRUCTURE PROPOSED SANITARY STRUCTURE S S PROPOSED WATER SERVICE W/ CURBSTOP EXISTING HYDRANT W/ VALVE PROPOSED HYDRANT W/ VALVE PROPOSED WATER FITTINGS PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPOSED LOT LINENSCALE IN FEET 0 H: 50 100 SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709 ST-13SBS S 12" DIP STA: 32+22.41 12"X6" TEE 10.00 LT 12" DIP||||||||||||||STA: 32+22.41 HYDRANT 9'-6" DIP 6" GV MH 30 MH 29401+20STA: 30+06.23 12"X12" WET TAP CONNECTION 10.00 LT 30+00 31+00 32+00 33+00 34+00 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 830 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 830 EXISTING C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED C/L ELEVATION 7.5' MIN. COVER 24" MIN.808.73808.730+00 808.90807.630+50 809.42807.631+00 809.51807.731+50 809.19808.132+00 808.81808.132+50 808.26808.033+00 807.71807.833+50 807.47807.534+00 807.69807.234+50 444' - 12" DIP CL 52 WATERMAIN MH 30 TYPE: 48" Ø - R-1642-B STA: 30+50.00 LOC: 0.00' R: 808.90 INV: 797.77 (N) 226' - 8" SDR-35 SANITARY SEWER @ 0.40% MH 29 TYPE: 48" Ø - R-1642-B STA: 32+75.86 LOC: 0.00' R: 808.53 INV: 796.87 (S) INV: 796.77 (N) 226' - 8" SDR-35 SANITARY SEWER @ 0.40% 24" MIN. PROPOSED PROFILE AT CENTERLINE EXISTING PROFILE AT CENTERLINE 8'X4'X - 4" POLYSTYRENE INSULATION CENTERED PERPEDICULAR ALONG WATERMAIN AT STORM CROSSING. SEE DETAIL WAT-7. 8'X4'X - 4" POLYSTYRENE INSULATION CENTERED PERPEDICULAR ALONG WATERMAIN AT STORM CROSSING. SEE DETAIL WAT-7. CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-SSWT-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 2:16:45 PMNSCALE IN FEET 0 H: 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 HEMINGWAY AVENUE S. - SANITARY AND WATER PLAN AND PROFILE 1 SANITARY SEWER NOTES: 1.ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE PVC SDR-35 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.CONNECT TO EXISTING SHALL ONLY BE PAID IF AN EXISTING STRUCTURE OR STUB IS PRESENT AT THE TIME OF SEWER INSTALLATION. IF A TEMPORARY PLUG IS REQUIRED, ONE SHALL BE INSTALLED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE CITY. 3.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR TELEVISING SANITARY SEWER PIPE AND STRUCTURES. WATERMAIN NOTES: 1.ALL WATERMAIN PIPE SHALL BE DIP CL.52 WRAPPED IN POLYETHYLENE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.WATERMAIN SHALL HAVE 7.5 MINIMUM COVER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3.HYDRANT ELEVATIONS ARE GIVEN TO A TOP NUT OF HYDRANT (TNH). 4.CONNECT TO EXISTING SHALL ONLY BE PAID IF AN EXISTING VALVE OR STUB IS PRESENT. IF A TEMPORARY PLUG IS REQUIRED, ONE SHALL BE INSTALLED, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, AND PAID FOR AS A DUCTILE IRON FITTING. SERVICE NOTES: 1.ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICE PIPE SHALL BE 4" PVC SCHEDULE 40 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.WATER SERVICE LINES SHALL BE TYPE K COPPER. 3.CURB BOXES AND OPERATING RODS TO BE INSTALLED BY UTILITY CONTRACTOR. 4.SEE SHEET C1.04 FOR SERVICE DETAIL INFORMATION. 5.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE AND RECORD INFORMATION ON THE "SEWER AND WATER SERVICE DATA SHEET". SEE C1.04. 6.SERVICES TO EXTEND 15' BEYOND RIGHT-OF-WAY. 7.SANITARY RISERS MUST HAVE 2' VERTICAL CLEARANCE BELOW THE WATERMAIN AT CROSSINGS. TYPICAL SERVICE INFORMATION: 1+00 INDICATES WYE STATION ALONG SEWER ALIGNMENT XXX.X INDICATES CURB BOX ELEVATION (FINISHED GROUND) XXX.X INDICATES INVERT ELEVATION OF SEWER SERVICE AT UPSTREAM END OF SERVICE (XXX.X)INDICATES SEWER RISER PIPE ELEVATION (WHEN APPLICABLE) 1 30+60 809.3 800.9 LOCATION: SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709MATCHLINE STA -SEE SHEET -34+50C4.036 HEMINGWAY AVENUE SOUTH (28.0' FC-FC WITHIN 60' ROW) C4.02 2 31+20 809.8 800.9 3 31+85 809.6 800.9 4 32+45 809.2 800.5 5 33+05 808.70 800.0 6 33+65 808.1 799.6 7 34+27 808.0 799.35 6 34+22 807.8 799.2 7 33+80 807.9 799.6 8 33+20 808.5 800.0 9 32+60 809.1 800.5 10 31+82 809.7 800.8 11 31+35 809.8 801.0 12 30+57 809.3 800.8 65+0064+50SS STA: 34+72.27 12" GV 10.00 LT 12" DIP STA: 35+12.28 12"X12" TEE 10.00 LT STA: 35+57.44 12"X6" TEE 10.00 LT 12" DIP STA: 35+57.43 20.04 LT HYDRANT 9'-6" DIP 6" GV MH 28 MH 27 35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00 39+00 STA: 35+32.26, 10.04 LT 12" GV 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 EXISTING C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED C/L ELEVATION 7.5' MIN. COVER 807.69807.234+50 808.06806.935+00 808.44807.035+50 808.80807.036+00 808.89807.536+50 808.61806.637+00 808.23806.437+50 807.86806.038+00 807.60805.938+50 807.72805.839+00 450' - 12" DIP CL 52 WATERMAIN MH 28 TYPE: 48" Ø - R-1642-B STA: 35+02.26 LOC: 0.00' R: 808.08 INV: 795.86 (S) INV: 795.76 (N) 213' - 8" SDR-35 SANITARY SEWER @ 0.40% MH 27 TYPE: 48" Ø - R-1642-B STA: 37+15.12 LOC: 0.00' R: 808.50 INV: 794.91 (S) INV: 794.81 (N) 250' - 8" SDR-35 SANITARY SEWER @ 0.40% 5.5' RISER PIPE 5.6' RISER PIPE 4.2' RISER PIPE 5.8' RISER PIPE 6.0' RISER PIPE 6.2' RISER PIPE 6.2' RISER PIPE 6.1' RISER PIPE 6.0' RISER PIPE 5.8' RISER PIPE 5.9' RISER PIPE 5.7' RISER PIPE 5.9' RISER PIPE PROPOSED PROFILE AT CENTERLINE EXISTING PROFILE AT CENTERLINE K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-SSWT-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 4:03:05 PMNSCALE IN FEET 0 H: 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 HEMINGWAY AVENUE S. - SANITARY AND WATER PLAN AND PROFILE SANITARY SEWER NOTES: 1.ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE PVC SDR-35 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.CONNECT TO EXISTING SHALL ONLY BE PAID IF AN EXISTING STRUCTURE OR STUB IS PRESENT AT THE TIME OF SEWER INSTALLATION. IF A TEMPORARY PLUG IS REQUIRED, ONE SHALL BE INSTALLED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE CITY. 3.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR TELEVISING SANITARY SEWER PIPE AND STRUCTURES. WATERMAIN NOTES: 1.ALL WATERMAIN PIPE SHALL BE DIP CL.52 WRAPPED IN POLYETHYLENE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.WATERMAIN SHALL HAVE 7.5 MINIMUM COVER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3.HYDRANT ELEVATIONS ARE GIVEN TO A TOP NUT OF HYDRANT (TNH). 4.CONNECT TO EXISTING SHALL ONLY BE PAID IF AN EXISTING VALVE OR STUB IS PRESENT. IF A TEMPORARY PLUG IS REQUIRED, ONE SHALL BE INSTALLED, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, AND PAID FOR AS A DUCTILE IRON FITTING. SERVICE NOTES: 1.ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICE PIPE SHALL BE 4" PVC SCHEDULE 40 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.WATER SERVICE LINES SHALL BE TYPE K COPPER. 3.CURB BOXES AND OPERATING RODS TO BE INSTALLED BY UTILITY CONTRACTOR. 4.SEE SHEET C1.04 FOR SERVICE DETAIL INFORMATION. 5.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE AND RECORD INFORMATION ON THE "SEWER AND WATER SERVICE DATA SHEET". SEE C1.04. 6.SERVICES TO EXTEND 15' BEYOND RIGHT-OF-WAY. 7.SANITARY RISERS MUST HAVE 2' VERTICAL CLEARANCE BELOW THE WATERMAIN AT CROSSINGS. TYPICAL SERVICE INFORMATION: 1+00 INDICATES WYE STATION ALONG SEWER ALIGNMENT XXX.X INDICATES CURB BOX ELEVATION (FINISHED GROUND) XXX.X INDICATES INVERT ELEVATION OF SEWER SERVICE AT UPSTREAM END OF SERVICE (XXX.X)INDICATES SEWER RISER PIPE ELEVATION (WHEN APPLICABLE) LOCATION: SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709HEMINGWAY AVENUE SOUTH (28.0' FC-FC WITHIN 60' ROW)MATCHLINE STA -SEE SHEET -34+50C4.02MATCHLINE STA -SEE SHEET -39+00C4.041 2 76 HENSLOWE AVENUE SOUTH SEE SHEET C4.05 C4.03 8 34+90 808.3 799.8 (798.9) 1 35+80 809.0 800.3 (799.4) 2 36+40 809.2 800.3 (799.4) 3 37+00 808.9 800.3 (799.4) 4 37+60 808.5 799.8 (798.9) 5 38+38 808.0 799.4 (798.5) 6 38+85 807.9 799.2 (798.3) 1 35+72 808.9 800.3 (799.4) 2 36+62 809.2 800.3 (799.4) 3 36+92 809.0 800.3 (799.4) 4 37+52 808.5 799.9 (799.0) 5 38+30 808.0 799.4 (798.5) 6 38+72 807.9 799.1 (798.2) ST-9SBSSBSS STA: 39+34.91 12" GV 10.00 LT 12" DIP STA: 39+74.91 12" CROSS 10.00 LT STA: 39+94.91 8" GV 10.00 LT STA: 40+04.91 8"X6" TEE 10.00 LT 8" DIP STA: 42+05.53 8" GV CONNECT TO EX. WATERMAIN 10.00 LT 8" DIP STA: 40+04.86 20.00 LT SALVAGED HYDRANT 9'-6" DIP 6" GV MH 26 MH 25 MH 60 93+0094+00STA: 39+83.08, 10.00 LT 12"X8" REDUCER 39+00 40+00 41+00 42+00 43+00 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 EXISTING C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED C/L ELEVATION 807.72805.839+00 808.08806.139+50 808.46806.640+00 808.82807.340+50 808.93808.141+00 808.67808.641+50 808.29808.642+00 807.92808.442+50 807.62808.943+00 807.68808.743+50 222' - 8" DIP CL 52 WATERMAIN 24" MIN. MH 26 TYPE: 48" Ø - R-1642-B STA: 39+64.91 LOC: 0.00' R: 808.19 INV: 793.81 (S) INV: 793.71 (N) INV: 793.81 (E) 162' - 8" SDR-35 SANITARY SEWER @ 0.40% MH 25 STA: 41+26.9, 0.0' TYPE: 48" DIA. RIM: 808.83 INV: 793.08 (S) INV: 792.98 (N) 7.6' RISER PIPE 8.0' RISER PIPE PROPOSED PROFILE AT CENTERLINE 83' - 12" DIP CL 52 WATERMAIN 7.5' MIN. COVER EXISTING PROFILE AT CENTERLINE 8'X4'X - 4" POLYSTYRENE INSULATION CENTERED PERPEDICULAR ALONG WATERMAIN AT STORM CROSSING. SEE DETAIL WAT-7.CONNECT TO EXISTING MANHOLE. FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND INVERT PRIOR TO CONNECTION. INV: 793.08 K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-SSWT-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 2:17:12 PMNSCALE IN FEET 0 H: 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 HEMINGWAY AVENUE S. - SANITARY AND WATER PLAN AND PROFILE SANITARY SEWER NOTES: 1.ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE PVC SDR-35 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.CONNECT TO EXISTING SHALL ONLY BE PAID IF AN EXISTING STRUCTURE OR STUB IS PRESENT AT THE TIME OF SEWER INSTALLATION. IF A TEMPORARY PLUG IS REQUIRED, ONE SHALL BE INSTALLED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE CITY. 3.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR TELEVISING SANITARY SEWER PIPE AND STRUCTURES. WATERMAIN NOTES: 1.ALL WATERMAIN PIPE SHALL BE DIP CL.52 WRAPPED IN POLYETHYLENE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.WATERMAIN SHALL HAVE 7.5 MINIMUM COVER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3.HYDRANT ELEVATIONS ARE GIVEN TO A TOP NUT OF HYDRANT (TNH). 4.CONNECT TO EXISTING SHALL ONLY BE PAID IF AN EXISTING VALVE OR STUB IS PRESENT. IF A TEMPORARY PLUG IS REQUIRED, ONE SHALL BE INSTALLED, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, AND PAID FOR AS A DUCTILE IRON FITTING. SERVICE NOTES: 1.ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICE PIPE SHALL BE 4" PVC SCHEDULE 40 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.WATER SERVICE LINES SHALL BE TYPE K COPPER. 3.CURB BOXES AND OPERATING RODS TO BE INSTALLED BY UTILITY CONTRACTOR. 4.SEE SHEET C1.04 FOR SERVICE DETAIL INFORMATION. 5.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE AND RECORD INFORMATION ON THE "SEWER AND WATER SERVICE DATA SHEET". SEE C1.04. 6.SERVICES TO EXTEND 15' BEYOND RIGHT-OF-WAY. 7.SANITARY RISERS MUST HAVE 2' VERTICAL CLEARANCE BELOW THE WATERMAIN AT CROSSINGS. TYPICAL SERVICE INFORMATION: 1+00 INDICATES WYE STATION ALONG SEWER ALIGNMENT XXX.X INDICATES CURB BOX ELEVATION (FINISHED GROUND) XXX.X INDICATES INVERT ELEVATION OF SEWER SERVICE AT UPSTREAM END OF SERVICE (XXX.X)INDICATES SEWER RISER PIPE ELEVATION (WHEN APPLICABLE) LOCATION: SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709HEMINGWAY AVENUE SOUTH (28.0' FC-FC WITHIN 60' ROW)MATCHLINE STA -SEE SHEET -39+00C4.032 7 3 4 109TH STREET SOUTH SEE SHEET C4.09 109TH STREET SOUTH SEE SHEET C4.09 C4.04 1 40+31 809.0 800.4 (799.5) 2 40+95 809.2 800.4 (799.5) 3 N/A 809.0 N/A N/A 1 N/A 808.8 N/A N/A 65+00 66+00 67+00 68+00 69+00 SS S 12" DIP 8" DIP STA: 68+40.00 8"X6" TEE 10.00 LT STA: 68+64.39 8" - 11.25° BEND 10.00 LT STA: 68+40.00 20.00 LT HYDRANT 9'-6" DIP 6" GV MH 28 MH 61 MH 59 STA: 35+12.28, 10.00 LT 12"X12" TEE STA: 64+96.21, 10.00 LT 12"X8" REDUCER 35+00 36+00STA: 65+29.90, 10.00 LT 8" GV 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 808.08806.965+00 808.01806.565+50 808.39806.466+00 808.66806.466+50 808.56805.967+00 808.20805.367+50 807.83805.268+00 807.45804.968+50 807.08805.169+00 EXISTING C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED C/L ELEVATION 7.5' MIN. COVER 401' - 8" DIP CL 52 WATERMAIN MH 28 MH 61 TYPE: 48" Ø - R-1642-B STA: 66+77.50 LOC: 0.00' R: 808.65 INV: 797.54 (E) 188' - 8" SDR-35 SANITARY SEWER @ 0.44% MH 59 TYPE: 48" Ø - R-1642-B STA: 68+65.42 LOC: 0.00' R: 807.34 INV: 796.62 (E) INV: 796.72 (W) 69' - 8" SDR-35 SANITARY SEWER @ 0.40% 24" MIN. PROPOSED PROFILE AT CENTERLINE 809.65807.364+50 808.08806.965+00 5' - 12" DIP CL 52 WATERMAIN EXISTING PROFILE AT CENTERLINE 8'X4'X - 4" POLYSTYRENE INSULATION CENTERED PERPEDICULAR ALONG WATERMAIN AT STORM CROSSING. SEE DETAIL WAT-7.K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-SSWT-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 2:17:25 PMHENSLOWE AVENUE S. - SANITARY AND WATER PLAN AND PROFILE N SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709LOCATION: SANITARY SEWER NOTES: 1.ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE PVC SDR-35 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.CONNECT TO EXISTING SHALL ONLY BE PAID IF AN EXISTING STRUCTURE OR STUB IS PRESENT AT THE TIME OF SEWER INSTALLATION. IF A TEMPORARY PLUG IS REQUIRED, ONE SHALL BE INSTALLED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE CITY. 3.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR TELEVISING SANITARY SEWER PIPE AND STRUCTURES. WATERMAIN NOTES: 1.ALL WATERMAIN PIPE SHALL BE DIP CL.52 WRAPPED IN POLYETHYLENE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.WATERMAIN SHALL HAVE 7.5 MINIMUM COVER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3.HYDRANT ELEVATIONS ARE GIVEN TO A TOP NUT OF HYDRANT (TNH). 4.CONNECT TO EXISTING SHALL ONLY BE PAID IF AN EXISTING VALVE OR STUB IS PRESENT. IF A TEMPORARY PLUG IS REQUIRED, ONE SHALL BE INSTALLED, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, AND PAID FOR AS A DUCTILE IRON FITTING. SERVICE NOTES: 1.ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICE PIPE SHALL BE 4" PVC SCHEDULE 40 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.WATER SERVICE LINES SHALL BE TYPE K COPPER. 3.CURB BOXES AND OPERATING RODS TO BE INSTALLED BY UTILITY CONTRACTOR. 4.SEE SHEET C1.04 FOR SERVICE DETAIL INFORMATION. 5.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE AND RECORD INFORMATION ON THE "SEWER AND WATER SERVICE DATA SHEET". SEE C1.04. 6.SERVICES TO EXTEND 15' BEYOND RIGHT-OF-WAY. 7.SANITARY RISERS MUST HAVE 2' VERTICAL CLEARANCE BELOW THE WATERMAIN AT CROSSINGS. TYPICAL SERVICE INFORMATION: 1+00 INDICATES WYE STATION ALONG SEWER ALIGNMENT XXX.X INDICATES CURB BOX ELEVATION (FINISHED GROUND) XXX.X INDICATES INVERT ELEVATION OF SEWER SERVICE AT UPSTREAM END OF SERVICE (XXX.X)INDICATES SEWER RISER PIPE ELEVATION (WHEN APPLICABLE)MATCHLINE STA -SEE SHEET -69+00C4.06HEMSLOWE AVENUE SOUTH (28.0' FC-FC WITHIN 60' ROW) 7 6HEMINGWAY AVENUE SOUTH SEE SHEET C4.03 HEMINGWAY AVENUE SOUTH SEE SHEET C4.03 C4.05 2 68+83 807.5 798.9 3 68+29 807.9 799.4 4 67+69 808.4 799.8 5 67+09 808.8 800.1 14 68+87 807.5 799.0 15 68+03 808.1 799.4 16 67+43 808.6 799.9 17 66+83 809.0 800.1 100+256 9 + 0 0 70+ 0 0 71+00 72+0 0 73+0 0 SBSBS SS S S 8 " D I P STA: 69+36.01 8" - 11.25° BEND 10.06 LT 8" D I P STA: 70+56.52 8" - 22.5° BEND 10.21 LT STA: 71+06.87 8"X6" TEE 14.00 LT STA: 71+34.77 8" - 22.5° BEND 10.19 LT 8" DIP STA: 71+89.93 8" - 11.25° BEND 10.00 LT 8" DI P STA: 72+98.23 8" GV 10.00 LT STA: 71+07.36 20.00 LT HYDRANT 5'-6" DIP 6" GV MH 59 MH 58 MH 57 MH 56 MH 55 100+00785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 EXISTING C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED C/L ELEVATION 805.08805.169+00 805.60805.669+50 808.05808.170+00 806.51806.570+50 805.18805.271+00 804.86804.971+50 806.01806.072+00 808.13808.172+50 810.45810.473+00 385' - 8" DIP CL 52 WATERMAIN MH 58 TYPE: 48" Ø - R-1642-B STA: 69+35.22 LOC: 0.00' R: 806.89 INV: 796.34 (W) INV: 796.24 (NE) 121' - 8" SDR-35 SANITARY SEWER @ 0.40% MH 57 TYPE: 48" Ø - R-1642-B STA: 70+56.76 LOC: 0.00' R: 807.45 INV: 795.76 (SW) INV: 795.66 (NE) 77' - 8" SDR-35 SANITARY SEWER @ 0.40% MH 56 TYPE: 48" Ø - R-1642-B STA: 71+34.41 LOC: 0.00' R: 808.03 INV: 795.35 (SW) INV: 795.25 (N) 54' - 8" SDR-35 SANITARY SEWER @ 0.40% MH 55 TYPE: 48" Ø - R-1642-B STA: 71+89.12 LOC: 0.00' R: 808.45 INV: 794.93 (N) INV: 795.03 (S) 5.1' RISER PIPE 6.0' RISER PIPE 6.1' RISER PIPE 7.0' RISER PIPE 6.5' RISER PIPE 233' - 8" SDR-35 SANITARY SEWER @ 0.40% 7.5' MIN. COVER 24" MIN. PROPOSED PROFILE AT CENTERLINE 8'X4'X - 4" POLYSTYRENE INSULATION CENTERED PERPEDICULAR ALONG WATERMAIN AT STORM CROSSING. SEE DETAIL WAT-7.K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-SSWT-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 2:17:38 PMHENSLOWE AVENUE S. - SANITARY AND WATER PLAN AND PROFILENSCALE IN FEET 0 H: 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 LOCATION: SANITARY SEWER NOTES: 1.ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE PVC SDR-35 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.CONNECT TO EXISTING SHALL ONLY BE PAID IF AN EXISTING STRUCTURE OR STUB IS PRESENT AT THE TIME OF SEWER INSTALLATION. IF A TEMPORARY PLUG IS REQUIRED, ONE SHALL BE INSTALLED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE CITY. 3.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR TELEVISING SANITARY SEWER PIPE AND STRUCTURES. WATERMAIN NOTES: 1.ALL WATERMAIN PIPE SHALL BE DIP CL.52 WRAPPED IN POLYETHYLENE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.WATERMAIN SHALL HAVE 7.5 MINIMUM COVER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3.HYDRANT ELEVATIONS ARE GIVEN TO A TOP NUT OF HYDRANT (TNH). 4.CONNECT TO EXISTING SHALL ONLY BE PAID IF AN EXISTING VALVE OR STUB IS PRESENT. IF A TEMPORARY PLUG IS REQUIRED, ONE SHALL BE INSTALLED, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, AND PAID FOR AS A DUCTILE IRON FITTING. SERVICE NOTES: 1.ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICE PIPE SHALL BE 4" PVC SCHEDULE 40 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.WATER SERVICE LINES SHALL BE TYPE K COPPER. 3.CURB BOXES AND OPERATING RODS TO BE INSTALLED BY UTILITY CONTRACTOR. 4.SEE SHEET C1.04 FOR SERVICE DETAIL INFORMATION. 5.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE AND RECORD INFORMATION ON THE "SEWER AND WATER SERVICE DATA SHEET". SEE C1.04. 6.SERVICES TO EXTEND 15' BEYOND RIGHT-OF-WAY. 7.SANITARY RISERS MUST HAVE 2' VERTICAL CLEARANCE BELOW THE WATERMAIN AT CROSSINGS. TYPICAL SERVICE INFORMATION: 1+00 INDICATES WYE STATION ALONG SEWER ALIGNMENT XXX.X INDICATES CURB BOX ELEVATION (FINISHED GROUND) XXX.X INDICATES INVERT ELEVATION OF SEWER SERVICE AT UPSTREAM END OF SERVICE (XXX.X)INDICATES SEWER RISER PIPE ELEVATION (WHEN APPLICABLE) MAT C HLI NE ST A - SEE S H E ET -69+00C4.05 - MATCHL INE STA - SEE SHEET73+00C4.07 HEMSLOWE AVENUE SOUTH (28.0' FC-FC WITHIN 60' ROW) 7 6 5 5 C4.06 5 72+51 809.2 800.5 (799.6) 6 71+98 808.8 800.1 (799.2) 7 71+41 808.4 799.8 (798.8) 8 70+76 807.9 799.3 9 70+36 807.6 799.0 10 69+98 807.3 798.6 1 69+15 807.3 798.6 11 72+73 809.4 800.2 (799.3) 12 71+73 808.6 800.2 (799.3) 13 70+23 807.5 798.9 73 + 0 0 74 + 0 0 75+00 76+00 77+00 S S S S 8" D I P STA: 73+38.52 8"X8" TEE 10.00 LT STA: 73+68.24 8"X6" TEE 10.00 LT STA: 73+58.24 8" GV 10.00 LT 8" D I P STA: 74+20.99 8" - 11.25° BEND 10.00 LT STA: 75+05.02 8" - 22.5° BEND 10.30 LT8" D I P 8" DIP STA: 75+89.04 8" - 11.25° BEND 10.00 LT 8" DIP STA: 76+95.02 8" - 11.25° BEND 10.00 LT STA: 73+68.24 20.00 LT HYDRANT 9'-6" DIP 6" GV MH 53 MH 52 MH 51 MH 49 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 830 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 830 EXISTING C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED C/L ELEVATION 7.5' MIN. COVER 809.28810.473+00 809.65812.173+50 810.03812.874+00 810.40812.674+50 810.77812.575+00 811.15813.075+50 811.35814.376+00 811.17813.276+50 810.79812.277+00 389' - 8" DIP CL 52 WATERMAIN MH 53 TYPE: 48" Ø - R-1642-B STA: 74+22.21 LOC: 0.00' R: 810.19 INV: 793.99 (S) INV: 793.89 (N) 82' - 8" SDR-26 SANITARY SEWER @ 0.40% MH 52 TYPE: 48" Ø - R-1642-B STA: 75+05.02 LOC: 0.00' R: 810.81 INV: 793.56 (S) INV: 793.46 (NW) 82' - 8" SDR-26 SANITARY SEWER @ 0.40% MH 51 TYPE: 48" Ø - R-1642-B STA: 75+87.82 LOC: 0.00' R: 811.33 INV: 793.13 (SE) INV: 793.03 (NW) 106' - 8" SDR-26 SANITARY SEWER @ 0.40% MH 49 TYPE: 48" Ø - R-1642-B STA: 76+93.71 LOC: 0.00' R: 810.84 INV: 792.61 (SE) INV: 792.51 (NW) 8.1' RISER PIPE 8.9' RISER PIPE 11.0' RISER PIPE 9.7' RISER PIPE 10.0' RISER PIPE 12.4' RISER PIPE 12.9' RISER PIPE PROPOSED PROFILE AT CENTERLINE 24" MIN. 24" MIN. EXISTING PROFILE AT CENTERLINE 8'X4'X - 4" POLYSTYRENE INSULATION CENTERED PERPEDICULAR ALONG WATERMAIN AT STORM CROSSING. SEE DETAIL WAT-7.K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-SSWT-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 2:17:50 PMHENSLOWE AVENUE S. - SANITARY AND WATER PLAN AND PROFILENSCALE IN FEET 0 H: 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709LOCATION: SANITARY SEWER NOTES: 1.ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE PVC SDR-35 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.CONNECT TO EXISTING SHALL ONLY BE PAID IF AN EXISTING STRUCTURE OR STUB IS PRESENT AT THE TIME OF SEWER INSTALLATION. IF A TEMPORARY PLUG IS REQUIRED, ONE SHALL BE INSTALLED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE CITY. 3.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR TELEVISING SANITARY SEWER PIPE AND STRUCTURES. WATERMAIN NOTES: 1.ALL WATERMAIN PIPE SHALL BE DIP CL.52 WRAPPED IN POLYETHYLENE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.WATERMAIN SHALL HAVE 7.5 MINIMUM COVER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3.HYDRANT ELEVATIONS ARE GIVEN TO A TOP NUT OF HYDRANT (TNH). 4.CONNECT TO EXISTING SHALL ONLY BE PAID IF AN EXISTING VALVE OR STUB IS PRESENT. IF A TEMPORARY PLUG IS REQUIRED, ONE SHALL BE INSTALLED, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, AND PAID FOR AS A DUCTILE IRON FITTING. SERVICE NOTES: 1.ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICE PIPE SHALL BE 4" PVC SCHEDULE 40 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.WATER SERVICE LINES SHALL BE TYPE K COPPER. 3.CURB BOXES AND OPERATING RODS TO BE INSTALLED BY UTILITY CONTRACTOR. 4.SEE SHEET C1.04 FOR SERVICE DETAIL INFORMATION. 5.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE AND RECORD INFORMATION ON THE "SEWER AND WATER SERVICE DATA SHEET". SEE C1.04. 6.SERVICES TO EXTEND 15' BEYOND RIGHT-OF-WAY. 7.SANITARY RISERS MUST HAVE 2' VERTICAL CLEARANCE BELOW THE WATERMAIN AT CROSSINGS. TYPICAL SERVICE INFORMATION: 1+00 INDICATES WYE STATION ALONG SEWER ALIGNMENT XXX.X INDICATES CURB BOX ELEVATION (FINISHED GROUND) XXX.X INDICATES INVERT ELEVATION OF SEWER SERVICE AT UPSTREAM END OF SERVICE (XXX.X)INDICATES SEWER RISER PIPE ELEVATION (WHEN APPLICABLE)MATCHLINE STA -SEE SHEET -73+00C4.06MATCHLINE STA -SEE SHEET -77+00C4.08HENSLOWE AVENUE SOUTH (28.0' FC-FC WITHIN 60' ROW) 5 4 109TH STREET SOUTH SEE SHEET C4.10 C4.07 8 76+60 811.4 802.8 (801.9) 9 75+67 811.6 802.8 (802.0) 10 73+88 810.1 802.8 (801.9) 1 74+63 810.8 801.8 (800.8) 2 74+14 810.4 801.8 (800.9) 3 73+67 810.1 801.4 (800.5) 4 73+07 809.6 801.1 (800.2) 77+0078+0 0 79+00 S S SS 8" DIPSTA: 78+00.27 8"X6" TEE 9.71 LT STA: 78+06.14 8" - 22.5° BEND 11.08 LT 8" DIP STA: 78+57.80 8" - 11.25° BEND 10.09 LT 8" DIP STA: 78+93.77 8" GV CONNECT TO EX. WATERMAIN 8.33 LTSTA: 77+99.13 19.76 LT SALVAGED HYDRANT 10'-6" DIP 6" GV MH 49 MH 47 MH 46 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 830 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 830 EXISTING C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED C/L ELEVATION 7.5' MIN. COVER 810.79812.277+00 810.41811.277+50 810.03810.078+00 809.66809.378+50 809.28809.679+00 808.90809.179+50 202' - 8" DIP CL 52 WATERMAIN 108' - 8" SDR-26 SANITARY SEWER @ 0.40% MH 47 TYPE: 48" Ø - R-1642-B STA: 78+03.11 LOC: 0.00' R: 810.01 INV: 792.08 (SE) INV: 791.98 (N) MH 46 STA: 78+57.8, 0.0' TYPE: 48" DIA. RIM: 809.59 INV: 790.06 (S) INV: 789.96 (N) 13.2' RISER PIPE 12.6' RISER PIPE 13.9' RISER PIPE 55' - 8" SDR-26 SANITARY SEWER @ 3.50% PROPOSED PROFILE AT CENTERLINE 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 806.72806.7400+00 807.53807.5400+50 807.86807.9401+00 21' - 12" DIP CL 52 WATERMAIN 8' - 6" DIP CL 52 WATERMAIN CONNECT TO EXISTING MANHOLE. FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND INVERT PRIOR TO CONNECTION. INV: 790.06 EXISTING PROFILE AT CENTERLINE CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN CO CO CO CO COCOCOCOCO CO CO CO |||||||| 400+00 401+00 STA: 400+18.53, 0.00 HYDRANT 8'-6" DIP STA: 400+26.53, 0.00 12"X6" REDUCER STA: 400+48.27, 0.00 12" GV CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN 12" DIP K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-SSWT-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 2:44:29 PMHENSLOWE AVENUE S. - SANITARY AND WATER PLAN AND PROFILE SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709SANITARY SEWER NOTES: 1.ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE PVC SDR-35 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.CONNECT TO EXISTING SHALL ONLY BE PAID IF AN EXISTING STRUCTURE OR STUB IS PRESENT AT THE TIME OF SEWER INSTALLATION. IF A TEMPORARY PLUG IS REQUIRED, ONE SHALL BE INSTALLED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE CITY. 3.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR TELEVISING SANITARY SEWER PIPE AND STRUCTURES. WATERMAIN NOTES: 1.ALL WATERMAIN PIPE SHALL BE DIP CL.52 WRAPPED IN POLYETHYLENE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.WATERMAIN SHALL HAVE 7.5 MINIMUM COVER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3.HYDRANT ELEVATIONS ARE GIVEN TO A TOP NUT OF HYDRANT (TNH). 4.CONNECT TO EXISTING SHALL ONLY BE PAID IF AN EXISTING VALVE OR STUB IS PRESENT. IF A TEMPORARY PLUG IS REQUIRED, ONE SHALL BE INSTALLED, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, AND PAID FOR AS A DUCTILE IRON FITTING. SERVICE NOTES: 1.ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICE PIPE SHALL BE 4" PVC SCHEDULE 40 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.WATER SERVICE LINES SHALL BE TYPE K COPPER. 3.CURB BOXES AND OPERATING RODS TO BE INSTALLED BY UTILITY CONTRACTOR. 4.SEE SHEET C1.04 FOR SERVICE DETAIL INFORMATION. 5.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE AND RECORD INFORMATION ON THE "SEWER AND WATER SERVICE DATA SHEET". SEE C1.04. 6.SERVICES TO EXTEND 15' BEYOND RIGHT-OF-WAY. 7.SANITARY RISERS MUST HAVE 2' VERTICAL CLEARANCE BELOW THE WATERMAIN AT CROSSINGS. TYPICAL SERVICE INFORMATION: 1+00 INDICATES WYE STATION ALONG SEWER ALIGNMENT XXX.X INDICATES CURB BOX ELEVATION (FINISHED GROUND) XXX.X INDICATES INVERT ELEVATION OF SEWER SERVICE AT UPSTREAM END OF SERVICE (XXX.X)INDICATES SEWER RISER PIPE ELEVATION (WHEN APPLICABLE) LOCATION: M A T C H L I N E S T A - S E E S H E E T - 77 + 0 0 C 4 . 0 7 HENSLOWE AVENUE SOUTH (28.0' FC-FC WITHIN 60' ROW) 4 C4.08 4 78+83 809.7 EX 801.6 (EX 800.6) 5 78+38 810.1 801.6 (800.7) 6 77+93 810.5 802.0 (801.0) 7 77+09 811.0 802.8 (801.8)NN 110TH STREET SOUTH (EXISTING ROADWAY WITHIN 33' ROW) SSSSTA: 91+90.22, 9.86 LT 12" PLUG WITH BLOW-OFF. SEE DETAIL WAT-8 12" DIP STA: 93+52.47 12" GV 10.00 LT STA: 94+12.47 8" GV 10.00 LT STA: 94+55.66 8" - 22.5° BEND 10.00 LT 8" DIP STA: 95+44.48 8" - 22.5° BEND 10.00 LT 8" D I P MH 26 MH 60 MH 60A 92+00 93+00 94+00 95+00 96+ 0 0 STA: 93+80.99, 10.00 LT 12"X8" REDUCER STA: 39+74.91, 10.00 LT 12" CROSS 39+0040+00785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 EXISTING C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED C/L ELEVATION 7.5' MIN. COVER 806.891+50 810.00808.492+00 809.37806.192+50 808.74805.593+00 808.11805.993+50 807.88806.294+00 808.22806.394+50 808.25806.795+00 807.94806.695+50 807.56806.496+00 192' - 12" DIP CL 52 WATERMAIN MH 26 TYPE: 48" Ø - R-1642-B STA: 39+64.91 LOC: 0.00' R: 808.19 INV: 793.81 (S) INV: 793.71 (N) INV: 793.81 (E) 71' - 8" SDR-35 SANITARY SEWER @ 1.12% MH 60 TYPE: 48" Ø - R-1642-B STA: 94+54.21 LOC: 0.00' R: 808.24 INV: 794.71 (E) INV: 794.61 (W) 90' - 8" SDR-35 SANITARY SEWER @ 0.40% MH 60A TYPE: 48" Ø - R-1642-B STA: 95+45.92 LOC: 0.00' R: 807.97 INV: 795.17 (SE) INV: 795.07 (W) 118' - 8" SDR-35 SANITARY SEWER @ 0.40% 6.8' RISER PIPE 4.9' RISER PIPE 4.9' RISER PIPE PROPOSED PROFILE AT CENTERLINE 24" MIN. 223' - 8" DIP CL 52 WATERMAIN EXISTING PROFILE AT CENTERLINE 8'X4'X - 4" POLYSTYRENE INSULATION CENTERED PERPEDICULAR ALONG WATERMAIN AT STORM CROSSING. SEE DETAIL WAT-7.K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-SSWT-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 4:17:12 PM109TH STREET S. - SANITARY AND WATER PLAN AND PROFILE N SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709LOCATION:MATCHLINE STA -SEE SHEET -96+00C4.10109TH STREET SOUTH (28.0' FC-FC WITHIN 60' ROW) 3 2 7 4 HEMINGWAY AVENUE SOUTH SEE SHEET C4.04 HEMINGWAY AVENUE SOUTH SEE SHEET C4.04 SANITARY SEWER NOTES: 1.ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE PVC SDR-35 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.CONNECT TO EXISTING SHALL ONLY BE PAID IF AN EXISTING STRUCTURE OR STUB IS PRESENT AT THE TIME OF SEWER INSTALLATION. IF A TEMPORARY PLUG IS REQUIRED, ONE SHALL BE INSTALLED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE CITY. 3.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR TELEVISING SANITARY SEWER PIPE AND STRUCTURES. WATERMAIN NOTES: 1.ALL WATERMAIN PIPE SHALL BE DIP CL.52 WRAPPED IN POLYETHYLENE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.WATERMAIN SHALL HAVE 7.5 MINIMUM COVER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3.HYDRANT ELEVATIONS ARE GIVEN TO A TOP NUT OF HYDRANT (TNH). 4.CONNECT TO EXISTING SHALL ONLY BE PAID IF AN EXISTING VALVE OR STUB IS PRESENT. IF A TEMPORARY PLUG IS REQUIRED, ONE SHALL BE INSTALLED, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, AND PAID FOR AS A DUCTILE IRON FITTING. SERVICE NOTES: 1.ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICE PIPE SHALL BE 4" PVC SCHEDULE 40 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.WATER SERVICE LINES SHALL BE TYPE K COPPER. 3.CURB BOXES AND OPERATING RODS TO BE INSTALLED BY UTILITY CONTRACTOR. 4.SEE SHEET C1.04 FOR SERVICE DETAIL INFORMATION. 5.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE AND RECORD INFORMATION ON THE "SEWER AND WATER SERVICE DATA SHEET". SEE C1.04. 6.SERVICES TO EXTEND 15' BEYOND RIGHT-OF-WAY. 7.SANITARY RISERS MUST HAVE 2' VERTICAL CLEARANCE BELOW THE WATERMAIN AT CROSSINGS. TYPICAL SERVICE INFORMATION: 1+00 INDICATES WYE STATION ALONG SEWER ALIGNMENT XXX.X INDICATES CURB BOX ELEVATION (FINISHED GROUND) XXX.X INDICATES INVERT ELEVATION OF SEWER SERVICE AT UPSTREAM END OF SERVICE (XXX.X)INDICATES SEWER RISER PIPE ELEVATION (WHEN APPLICABLE) C4.09 14 95+58 808.2 799.6 (798.7) 15 95+12 808.5 799.9 (798.9) 16 94+47 808.5 800.2 (799.3) 100+25 73+0074+00SSSSSSTA: 96+39.95 8"X6" TEE 10.00 LT STA: 99+72.27 8" GV 10.00 LT STA: 96+39.64 20.00 LT HYDRANT 9'-6" DIP 6" GV MH 60A MH 64 MH 63 MH 62 STA: 96+63.21 8" - 11.25° BEND 10.00 LT STA: 97+25.20 8" - 22.5° BEND 10.17 LT 8" DIP 96 + 0 0 97+0 0 98+00 99+00 100+00 STA: 73+38.52, 10.00 LT 8"X8" TEE 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 EXISTING C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED C/L ELEVATION 7.5' MIN. COVER 807.56806.496+00 807.19806.196+50 806.92806.597+00 807.05807.897+50 807.48809.698+00 807.93811.498+50 808.37812.699+00 808.82811.299+50 809.45811.7100+00 100+25 24" MIN. MH 62 TYPE: 48" Ø - R-1642-B STA: 96+64.22 LOC: 0.00' R: 807.08 INV: 795.74 (SE) INV: 795.64 (NW) MH 63 TYPE: 48" Ø - R-1642-B STA: 97+25.00 LOC: 0.00' R: 806.93 INV: 796.08 (E) INV: 795.98 (NW) 80' - 8" SDR-35 SANITARY SEWER @ 0.40% MH 64 TYPE: 48" Ø - R-1642-B STA: 98+05.00 LOC: 0.00' R: 807.52 INV: 796.40 (W) 4.8' RISER PIPE 4.0' RISER PIPE 385' - 8" DIP CL 52 WATERMAIN 24" MIN. 60' - 8" SDR-35 SANITARY SEWER @ 0.40% 100+00 809.69811.7100+25 8" PVC INV: 794.37 EXISTING PROFILE AT CENTERLINE 8'X4'X - 4" POLYSTYRENE INSULATION CENTERED PERPEDICULAR ALONG WATERMAIN AT STORM CROSSING. SEE DETAIL WAT-7. 8'X4'X - 4" POLYSTYRENE INSULATION CENTERED PERPEDICULAR ALONG WATERMAIN AT STORM CROSSING. SEE DETAIL WAT-7. PROPOSED PROFILE AT CENTERLINE K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-SSWT-PLAN.dwg 2/3/2025 3:57:12 PMC4.10 109TH STREET S. - SANITARY AND WATER PLAN AND PROFILE N SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709LOCATION:MATCHLINE STA -SEE SHEET -96+00C4.09109TH STREET SOUTH (28.0' FC-FC WITHIN 60' ROW) 4 7 SANITARY SEWER NOTES: 1.ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE PVC SDR-35 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.CONNECT TO EXISTING SHALL ONLY BE PAID IF AN EXISTING STRUCTURE OR STUB IS PRESENT AT THE TIME OF SEWER INSTALLATION. IF A TEMPORARY PLUG IS REQUIRED, ONE SHALL BE INSTALLED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE CITY. 3.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR TELEVISING SANITARY SEWER PIPE AND STRUCTURES. WATERMAIN NOTES: 1.ALL WATERMAIN PIPE SHALL BE DIP CL.52 WRAPPED IN POLYETHYLENE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.WATERMAIN SHALL HAVE 7.5 MINIMUM COVER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3.HYDRANT ELEVATIONS ARE GIVEN TO A TOP NUT OF HYDRANT (TNH). 4.CONNECT TO EXISTING SHALL ONLY BE PAID IF AN EXISTING VALVE OR STUB IS PRESENT. IF A TEMPORARY PLUG IS REQUIRED, ONE SHALL BE INSTALLED, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, AND PAID FOR AS A DUCTILE IRON FITTING. SERVICE NOTES: 1.ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICE PIPE SHALL BE 4" PVC SCHEDULE 40 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.WATER SERVICE LINES SHALL BE TYPE K COPPER. 3.CURB BOXES AND OPERATING RODS TO BE INSTALLED BY UTILITY CONTRACTOR. 4.SEE SHEET C1.04 FOR SERVICE DETAIL INFORMATION. 5.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE AND RECORD INFORMATION ON THE "SEWER AND WATER SERVICE DATA SHEET". SEE C1.04. 6.SERVICES TO EXTEND 15' BEYOND RIGHT-OF-WAY. 7.SANITARY RISERS MUST HAVE 2' VERTICAL CLEARANCE BELOW THE WATERMAIN AT CROSSINGS. TYPICAL SERVICE INFORMATION: 1+00 INDICATES WYE STATION ALONG SEWER ALIGNMENT XXX.X INDICATES CURB BOX ELEVATION (FINISHED GROUND) XXX.X INDICATES INVERT ELEVATION OF SEWER SERVICE AT UPSTREAM END OF SERVICE (XXX.X)INDICATES SEWER RISER PIPE ELEVATION (WHEN APPLICABLE) 11 97+87 807.7 798.9 12 96+85 807.3 798.9 13 96+17 807.7 799.2 (798.3) 7 94+42 807.5 799.3 (798.4) 8 97+17 807.2 799.3 9 97+43 808.4 798.8 10 97+95 807.8 799.3 HENSLOWE AVENUE SOUTH SEE SHEET C4.07 HENSLOWE AVENUE SOUTH SEE SHEET C4.07 SBS S30+00 31+00 32+00 33+00 34+00 CB-2 12"12"CB-3 12"CB-6 15"CB-5 12"18" 1 2 3 4 5 6 67891011 7 12|||||||||||||EXISTING C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED C/L ELEVATION 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 830 835 840 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 830 835 840 808.73808.730+00 808.90807.630+50 809.42807.631+00 809.51807.731+50 809.19808.132+00 808.81808.132+50 808.26808.033+00 807.71807.833+50 807.47807.534+00 807.69807.234+50 CB-3 CB-5 RIM: 806.86STA 33+99.76, 15.00' RT60" DIA CBMHINV: 802.06 (W)INV: 801.91 (N)- R-3067-VB30' - 15" CL V RCP @ 0.50% CB-6 RIM: 806.86STA 34+02.41, 15.00' LT48" DIA CBMHINV: 802.36 (W)INV: 802.21 (E)- R-3067-VBEXISTING PROFILE AT CENTERLINE 88' - 18" CL V RCP @ 0.46% CB-5 PROPOSED PROFILE AT CENTERLINE 12" DIP INV:798.79 8" PVC INV: 796.26 K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-STRM-PLAN.dwg 2/3/2025 4:00:43 PMC5.01 SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 HEMINGWAY AVENUE SOUTH (28.0' FC-FC WITHIN 60' ROW) SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE597091 HEMINGWAY AVE S. - STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE 6 LOCATION:MATCHLINE STA -SEE SHEET -34+50C5.02NSEE SHEET C5.19 SEE SHEET C5.10 SEE SHEET C5.10 SS35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00 39+00 CB-8CB-7 18" MH-1 12"CB-115 CB-116 18"12"18"12"1 2 3 4 5 6 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 6EXISTING C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED PROFILE AT CENTERLINE 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 807.69807.234+50 808.06806.935+00 808.44807.035+50 808.80807.036+00 808.89807.536+50 808.61806.637+00 808.23806.437+50 807.86806.038+00 807.60805.938+50 807.72805.839+00 MH-1 RIM: 807.74STA 34+87.26, 15.00' RT48" DIA MHINV: 801.51 (S)INV: 801.51 (E)- R-1678-ACB-116 RIM: 806.93STA 38+49.76, 15.00' RT48" DIA CBMHINV: 803.32 (W)INV: 803.22 (E)- R-3067-VBCB-115 RIM: 806.98STA 38+59.92, 15.00' LT2'X3' CBINV: 803.48 (E)- R-3067-VB32' - 12" CL V RCP @ 0.50% EXISTING PROFILE AT CENTERLINE K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-STRM-PLAN.dwg 2/3/2025 12:41:57 PMSCALE IN FEET 0 H: 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709HEMINGWAY AVENUE S. - STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE LOCATION:NHEMINGWAY AVENUE SOUTH (28.0' FC-FC WITHIN 60' ROW)MATCHLINE STA -SEE SHEET -34+50C5.01MATCHLINE STA -SEE SHEET -39+00C5.032 7 HENSLOWE AVENUE SOUTH SEE SHEET C5.04 SEE SHEET C5.04 SEE SHEET C5.16 C5.02 SB93+0094+00SSS39+00 40+00 41+00 42+00 43+00 CB-28 CB-27 18"CB-25 12"18"CB-24A 15"12" CB-26 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 16 5 ST-9SB1616EXISTING C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED PROFILE AT CENTERLINE 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 807.72805.839+00 808.08806.139+50 808.46806.640+00 808.82807.340+50 808.93808.141+00 808.67808.641+50 808.29808.642+00 807.92808.442+50 807.62808.943+00 807.68808.743+50 EXISTING PROFILE AT CENTERLINE 18" CL V RCP INV: 801.19 K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-STRM-PLAN.dwg 2/3/2025 12:42:12 PMSCALE IN FEET 0 H: 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709HEMINGWAY AVENUE S. - STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE LOCATION: HEMINGWAY AVENUE SOUTH (28.0' FC-FC WITHIN 60' ROW)MATCHLINE STA -SEE SHEET -39+00C5.02N3 4 109TH STREET SOUTH SEE SHEET C5.08 109TH STREET SOUTH SEE SHEET C5.08 SEE SHEET C5.08 C5.03 65+00 66+00 67+00 68+00 69+00 SS S 35+0036+00CB-8 CB-7 18"MH-1 18"18"12"12"18" CB-10 CB-11 12"18" 18"12"14 151617 2345 1 6 PROPOSED PROFILE AT CENTERLINE 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 830 835 808.08806.965+00 808.01806.565+50 808.39806.466+00 808.66806.466+50 808.56805.967+00 808.20805.367+50 807.83805.268+00 807.45804.968+50 807.08805.169+00 MH-1 CB-7 RIM: 807.50STA 65+41.50, 15.00' RT48" DIA CBMHINV: 801.38 (W)INV: 803.37 (N)INV: 801.38 (E)- R-3067-VCB-10 RIM: 808.05STA 66+58.52, 15.00' RT48" DIA CBMHINV: 800.85 (W)INV: 804.01 (S)INV: 800.85 (E)- R-3067-VCB-11 RIM: 806.85STA 68+48.37, 15.00' RT48" DIA CBMHINV: 799.90 (W)INV: 799.90 (E)- R-3067-V795 800 805 810 815 820 825 830 835 CB-8 RIM: 807.63STA 65+41.50, 15.00' LT2'X3' CBINV: 803.63 (S)- R-3067-VB27' - 18" CL V RCP @ 0.50% 117' - 18" CL V RCP @ 0.45% 190' - 18" CL V RCP @ 0.50% 30' - 12" CL V RCP @ 0.87% EXISTING PROFILE AT CENTERLINE CB-7 INV: 801.51 (S) INV: 801.51 (E) 8" DIP INV:799.54 808.32807.164+75 808.08806.965+00 EXISTING C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED C/L ELEVATION K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-STRM-PLAN.dwg 2/3/2025 4:04:13 PMSCALE IN FEET 0 H: 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709HENSLOWE AVENUE S. - STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE LOCATION:MATCHLINE STA -SEE SHEET -69+00C5.05HEMSLOWE AVENUE SOUTH (28.0' FC-FC WITHIN 60' ROW) N 7 6 HEMINGWAY AVENUE SOUTH SEE SHEET C5.02 HEMINGWAY AVENUE SOUTH SEE SHEET C5.02 SEE SHEET C5.02 SEE SHEET C5.19 C5.04 SB100+006 9 + 0 0 70+ 0 0 71+00 72+0 0 73+0 0 S SS S S 1 8 " CB-11 CB-12 CB-14 12" MH-3 12"12"CB-13 CB-4A 30" CB-1824" 1 8 "24"30"30"4 5 6789 11 1213 1 1015"EXISTING C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED PROFILE AT CENTERLINE 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 807.08805.169+00 806.87805.669+50 807.03808.170+00 807.40806.570+50 807.78805.271+00 808.15804.971+50 808.53806.072+00 808.90808.172+50 809.28810.473+00 CB-12 RIM: 806.25STA 69+53.41, 15.00' RT60" DIA CBMHINV: 800.42 (NW)INV: 799.34 (W)INV: 799.84 (NE)INV: 798.84 (SE)- R-3067-VBCB-13 RIM: 806.90STA 70+65.11, 15.00' RT2'X3' CBINV: 803.00 (SW)- R-3067-VCB-4A RIM: 807.60STA 71+57.79, 15.00' RT72" DIA CBMHINV: 795.32 (E)INV: 795.32 (N)- R-3067-V111' - 18" CL V RCP @ 0.50% 116' - 12" CL V R C P @ 2 . 7 2 % 158' - 30" CL III RCP @ 0.50% EXISTING PROFILE AT CENTERLINE K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-STRM-PLAN.dwg 2/3/2025 12:42:41 PMSCALE IN FEET 0 H: 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709HENSLOWE AVENUE S. - STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE LOCATION:NMAT C HLI NE ST A - SEE S H E ET -69+00C5.04MATCHLINE STA -SEE SHEET -73+00C5.06 HEMSLOWE AVENUE SOUTH (28.0' FC-FC WITHIN 60' ROW) 5 7 C5.05 SEE SHEET C5.13 SEE SHEET C5.13 SEE SHEET C5.13 100+0073 + 0 0 74 + 0 0 75+00 76+00 77+00 S S S S100+2530 " CB-18 24"30 " 30 " MH-6 CB-19 12"12"CB-20 12" CB-33 1 2 3 78 9 1010 EXISTING C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED C/L ELEVATION 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 809.28810.473+00 809.65812.173+50 810.03812.874+00 810.40812.674+50 810.77812.575+00 811.15813.075+50 811.35814.376+00 811.17813.276+50 810.79812.277+00 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 CB-18 RIM: 808.76STA 73+13.16, 15.00' RT72" DIA CBMHINV: 797.25 (W)INV: 794.53 (S)INV: 794.53 (N)- R-3067-VCB-19 RIM: 809.34STA 73+90.27, 15.00' RT60" DIA CBMHINV: 794.14 (S)INV: 805.10 (W)INV: 794.14 (N)- R-3067-VMH-6 RIM: 811.08STA 74+99.45, 30.00' RT60" DIA MHINV: 793.54 (S)INV: 793.54 (NE)- R-1678-ASUMP: 789.54CB-20 RIM: 809.26STA 73+80.03, 15.00' LT2'X3' CBINV: 805.26 (E)- R-3067-VCB-19 77' - 30" CL III RCP @ 0.50%120' - 30" CL IV RCP @ 0.50% 32' - 12" CL V RCP @ 0.50% 8" DIP INV:801.59 8" PVC INV: 794.14 PROPOSED PROFILE AT CENTERLINEEXISTING PROFILE AT CENTERLINE K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-STRM-PLAN.dwg 2/3/2025 4:06:07 PMNSCALE IN FEET 0 H: 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709HENSLOWE AVENUE S. - STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE LOCATION:MATCHLINE STA -SEE SHEET -73+00C5.05MATCHLINE STA -SEE SHEET -77+00C5.07HENSLOWE AVENUE SOUTH (28.0' FC-FC WITHIN 60' ROW) 4 5 109TH STREET SOUTH SEE SHEET C5.09 C5.06 SEE SHEET C5.09 SEE SHEET C5.14 77+0078+0 0 79+00 S S SS 4 5 6 7 EXISTING C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED PROFILE AT CENTERLINE 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 810.79812.277+00 810.41811.277+50 810.03810.078+00 809.66809.378+50 809.28809.679+00 EXISTING PROFILE AT CENTERLINE SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709HENSLOWE AVENUE S. - STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE LOCATION:NM A T C H L I N E S T A - S E E S H E E T - 77 + 0 0 C 5 . 0 6 HENSLOWE AVENUE SOUTH (28.0' FC-FC WITHIN 60' ROW) 4 C5.07K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-STRM-PLAN.dwg 2/3/2025 12:43:10 PM 92+00 93+00 94+00 95+00 96+ 0 0SSS 39+0040+0012" CB-29 12"CB-28 15" CB-27 18" CB-2512"18" CB-24A 18" CB-24 12"15"12"12"CB-26 CB-113 1415 1 6 6 16 EXISTING C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED PROFILE AT CENTERLINE 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 830 835 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 830 835 807.091+75 810.00808.492+00 809.37806.192+50 808.74805.593+00 808.11805.993+50 807.88806.294+00 808.22806.394+50 808.25806.795+00 807.94806.695+50 807.56806.496+00 CB-29 RIM: 809.26STA 92+09.97, 15.00' RT48" DIA CBMHINV: 802.56 (S)INV: 802.56 (N)INV: 802.31 (E)- R-3067-VCB-27 RIM: 807.79STA 93+41.23, 15.00' RT48" DIA CBMHINV: 801.65 (W)INV: 803.80 (N)INV: 801.40 (E)- R-3067-VCB-25 RIM: 807.60STA 94+24.23, 15.00' RT48" DIA CBMHINV: 803.39 (N)INV: 800.99 (W)INV: 800.89 (E)- R-3067-VBCB-24ARIM: 807.64STA 94+68.21, 15.00' RT48" DIA CBMHINV: 800.68 (W)INV: 800.58 (SE)- R-3067-VCB-24 RIM: 807.25STA 95+59.39, 15.00' RT60" DIA CBMHINV: 800.17 (NW)INV: 800.92 (S)INV: 799.92 (SE)- R-3067-VCB-26 RIM: 807.54STA 94+24.23, 15.00' LT2'X3' CBINV: 803.54 (S)- R-3067-VBCB-25 131' - 15" CL V RCP @ 0.50%83' - 18" CL V RCP @ 0.50% 82' - 18" CL V RCP @ 0.50% 43' - 18" CL V RCP @ 0.50% 30' - 12" CL V RCP @ 0.50% EXISTING PROFILE AT CENTERLINE 30' 12" CL V RCP @ 0.80% CB-28 RIM: 807.73STA 93+41.23, 15.00' LT2'X3' CBINV: 804.04 (S)- R-3067-VBCB-27 12" DIP INV:798.90 8" DIP INV:798.83 8" PVC INV: 794.27 K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-STRM-PLAN.dwg 2/3/2025 12:43:24 PMN SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709109TH STREET S. - STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE LOCATION:MATCHLINE STA -SEE SHEET -96+00C5.09109 STREET SOUTH (28.0' FC-FC WITHIN 60' ROW) 2 3 4 7 HEMINGWAY AVENUE SOUTH SEE SHEET C5.03 HEMINGWAY AVENUE SOUTH SEE SHEET C5.03 C5.08 SEE SHEET C5.10 SEE SHEET C5.10 SEE SHEET ##### 96 + 0 0 97+00 98+00 99+00 100+00 73+0074+00SSSS100+25 30"CB-18 24"30"CB-19 12"12" CB-20 CB-24 12"21"12"CB-22 24" CB-2112"24" CB-23 12"12"CB-113 7 8 9 10 1112 10 11 EXISTING C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED C/L ELEVATION 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 830 835 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 830 835 807.56806.496+00 807.19806.196+50 806.92806.597+00 807.05807.897+50 807.48809.698+00 807.93811.498+50 808.37812.699+00 808.82811.299+50 809.45811.7100+00 100+25 CB-18 CB-22 RIM: 806.30STA 97+09.33, 15.00' RT60" DIA CBMHINV: 799.15 (NW)INV: 802.15 (N)INV: 798.90 (E)- R-3067-VBCB-21 RIM: 807.29STA 98+48.06, 15.00' RT48" DIA CBMHINV: 798.19 (W)INV: 801.10 (N)INV: 798.09 (E)- R-3067-VCB-23 RIM: 806.30STA 97+09.33, 15.00' LT2'X3' CBINV: 802.30 (S)- R-3067-VBCB-22 154' - 21" CL III RCP @ 0.50% 143' - 24" CL III RCP @ 0.50% 169' - 24" CL III RCP @ 0.50% 30' - 12" CL V RCP @ 0.50%EXISTING PROFILE AT CENTERLINE 8" PVC INV: 794.37 8" DIP INV:798.46 8" PVC INV: 795.92 PROPOSED PROFILE AT CENTERLINE INV: 797.25 (W) INV: 794.53 (S) INV: 794.53 (N)MATCHLINE STA -SEE SHEET -96+00C5.08K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-STRM-PLAN.dwg 2/3/2025 12:43:40 PMSCALE IN FEET 0 H: 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709109TH STREET S. - STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE LOCATION:LOCATION: 109TH STREET SOUTH (28.0' FC-FC WITHIN 60' ROW) N 4 7 SEE SHEET C5.15 C5.09 SEE SHEET C5.05 SEE SHEET C5.06 HENSLOWE AVENUE SOUTH SEE SHEET C5.05 HENSLOWE AVENUE SOUTH SEE SHEET C5.06 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 807.18809.0200+00 807.40807.9200+50 807.54807.4201+00 809.08807.8201+50 809.30808.0202+00 808.66808.1202+50 808.96808.6203+00 810.08808.7203+50 809.82808.4204+00 807.75808.6204+50 EXISTING C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED C/L ELEVATION CB-1A RIM: 807.09STA 200+02.24, 0.00'MNDOT DESIGN NINV: 804.09 (S)- R-434273' - 12" CL V RCP @ 0.40% CB-1 RIM: 806.89STA 200+74.85, 0.00' LT48" DIA CBMHINV: 803.80 (N)INV: 803.80 (E)- R-4342176' - 12" CL V RCP @ 0.40% CB-2 RIM: 808.17STA 30+24.37, 19.29' LT48" DIA CBMHINV: 803.10 (W)INV: 803.10 (E)- R-3067-V39' - 12" CL V RCP @ 0.40% CB-3 RIM: 808.17STA 30+24.29, 19.25' RT48" DIA CBMHINV: 802.95 (W)INV: 802.95 (E)- R-3067-VB135' - 12" CL V RCP @ 0.40% MH-27 RIM: 808.25STA 204+24.80, 0.00'48" DIA MHINV: 802.41 (W)INV: 802.41 (N)- R-1678-APROPOSED PROFILE AT CENTERLINE EXISTING PROFILE AT CENTERLINE 12" DIP S30+0031+00CB-2 12"12" CB-3 12"12"CB-1 12"CB-1A 1 12 CO CO CO CO COCOCOCOCO CO CO CO MB |||||||||||||||| |||||| ||||||||| OH OH 200+00 201+00 202+00 203+00 204+00 205+002 MH-27 K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-STRM-PLAN-2.dwg 2/3/2025 12:43:59 PMSCALE IN FEET 0 H: 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709BACKYARD STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE LOCATION: N CB-1A TO MH-27 6 1 SEE SHEET C5.11 C5.10HEMINGWAY AVENUE S 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 809.82808.4204+00 807.75808.6204+50 806.75808.9205+00 805.75807.7205+50 807.97808.6206+00 808.15807.5206+50 806.89807.0207+00 207+50 133' - 12" CL V RCP @ 0.50% CB-4 RIM: 805.58STA 205+58.08, 0.00'48" DIA CBMHINV: 801.74 (S)INV: 801.74 (N)- R-4342163' - 12" CL V RCP @ 0.50% PROPOSED PROFILE AT CENTERLINE EXISTING PROFILE AT CENTERLINE MH-27 EXISTING C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED C/L ELEVATION CB-127 RIM: 806.48STA 207+20.82, 0.00'48" DIA CBMHINV: 800.93 (S)INV: 800.93 (E)- R-4342INV: 802.41 (W) INV: 802.41 (N) 12" CB-4 12"12"CB-122 CB-127 CB-9 7891011 MB|||||||||||||OHOHOH207+44204+00205+00 206+00 207+00 210+00 5 12 MH-27 280+00 K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-STRM-PLAN-2.dwg 2/3/2025 12:44:14 PMSCALE IN FEET 0 H: 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709LOCATION:NMH-27 TO CB-127 6 SEE SHEETC5.12 SEE SHEET C5.10 6 C5.11 BACKYARD STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 830 835 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 830 835 806.96806.9210+00 805.32806.5210+50 805.93806.0211+00 805.19805.7211+50 804.06805.2212+00 803.12804.9212+50 804.26805.2213+00 803.42807.0213+50 803.37808.0214+00 214+50 CB-127 CB-122 RIM: 804.69STA 207+21.58, 70.06' RT48" DIA CBMHINV: 800.58 (W)INV: 800.33 (E)- R-434270' - 12" CL V RCP @ 0.50% 169' - 15" CL V RCP @ 0.50% CB-121RIM: 803.08STA 212+43.91, 0.00'48" DIA CBMHINV: 799.49 (W)INV: 799.49 (E)- R-434289' - 15" CL V RCP @ 0.50% CB-120 RIM: 803.44STA 213+33.30, 0.00'48" DIA CBMHINV: 799.04 (W)INV: 799.04 (NE)- R-4342MH-2 RIM: 803.37STA 214+00.77, 0.00'48" DIA MHINV: 798.14 (NW)INV: 798.70 (SW)INV: 798.14 (SE)- R-1678-ASUMP: 794.1467' - 15" CL V RCP @ 0.50% EXISTING C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED C/L ELEVATION OCS-1ARIM: 800.60STA 215+08.38, 0.00' LT72" DIA MHINV: 798.00 (NE)- R-1678-ASUMP: 795.0016' - 15" CL V RCP @ 0.00% FES-17STA 215+24.38, 0.01' RT15" FESINV: 798.00 (SW)PROPOSED PROFILE AT CENTERLINE EXISTING PROFILE AT CENTERLINE INV: 800.93 (S) INV: 800.93 (E)24"12"12" 15" CB-121 15" CB-122 15" CB-120 MH-2 24" FES-4 CB-127 15" OCS-1A FES-17 1 234 5207+44207+00214+ 2 5 210+00 211+00 212+00 213+00 214+00224+00225+00215+ 3 0 215+ 0 0 K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-STRM-PLAN-2.dwg 2/3/2025 12:44:30 PMSCALE IN FEET 0 H: 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709LOCATION: N CB-127 TO MH-2, AND OCS-1A TO FES-17 6 SEE SHEET C5.13 SEE SHEET C5.11 5 SEE SHEET C5.13 C5.12 BACKYARD STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE BASIN 1 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 830 835 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 830 835 805.78805.0220+00 806.65805.3220+50 806.18806.2221+00 807.54806.4221+50 808.10805.9222+00 806.91805.9222+50 807.23806.1223+00 808.24807.3223+50 807.19807.3224+00 804.25808.0224+50 795.34807.9225+00 PROPOSED PROFILE AT CENTERLINE EXISTING PROFILE AT CENTERLINE CB-17 RIM: 805.22STA 220+25.31, 0.00' LTMNDOT DESIGN NINV: 802.22 (E)- R-4342CB-15 RIM: 805.69STA 221+19.44, 0.00'48" DIA CBMHINV: 801.84 (W)INV: 801.84 (NE)INV: 801.74 (S)- R-4342MH-3 RIM: 808.13STA 221+92.65, 0.00'48" DIA MHINV: 801.37 (N)INV: 801.27 (SE)- R-1678-ACB-14 RIM: 806.25STA 69+54.03, 15.00' LT48" DIA CBMHINV: 800.97 (NW)INV: 800.72 (SE)- R-3067-VBCB-12 MH-2 27' - 24" CL III RCP @ 0.50% 175' - 24" CL III RCP @ 0.40% 30' - 15" CL V RCP @ 1.00% 60' - 12" CL V RCP @ 0.50%73' - 12" CL V RCP @ 0.50%94' - 12" CL V RCP @ 0.40% EXISTING C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED C/L ELEVATION 36' - 12" CL V RCP @ 2.95% CB-16 RIM: 806.59STA 226+02.92, 0.00'MNDOT DESIGN NINV: 802.90 (SW)- R-4342CB-15 FES-4STA 224+85.02, 0.00'24" FESINV: 798.00 (NW)8" DIP 8" PVC INV: 800.42 (NW) INV: 799.34 (W) INV: 799.84 (NE) INV: 798.84 (SE) INV: 798.14 (NW) INV: 798.70 (SW) INV: 798.14 (SE)SBS18"CB-12 CB-14 12"24" MH-3 12" 12"12"12"CB-15 CB-17 CB-16 24" 12"15"MH-2 24" FES-4 9 9 10 13 14 1510 214+25214+00 226+46226+00220+00221+00222+00 223+00 224+00 225+00 K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-STRM-PLAN-2.dwg 2/3/2025 12:44:46 PMSCALE IN FEET 0 H: 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709LOCATION: CB-17 TO CB-15 TO FES-4, AND CB-16 TO CB-15 6 SEE SHEET C5.12 N5 7 C5.13 SEE SHEET C5.05 SEE SHEET C5.05 BACKYARD STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILEHENSLOWE AVENUE S EXISTING C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED PROFILE AT CENTERLINE EXISTING PROFILE AT CENTERLINE 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 797.96804.2230+00 804.51805.2230+50 806.98805.9231+00 809.37805.5231+50 808.88805.1232+00 808.00805.1232+50 OCS-1 RIM: 806.06STA 230+21.51, 0.00'84" DIA MHINV: 796.37 (N)- R-1678-ASUMP: 793.50MH-5 RIM: 806.06STA 230+88.50, 0.00'72" DIA MHINV: 796.04 (S)INV: 796.04 (W)- R-1678-A67' - 30" CL III RCP @ 0.50%144' - 30" CL III RCP @ 0.50% CB-4A 810.59811.7235+50 810.27810.0236+00 804.15807.7236+50 792.80806.2237+00 237+50 MH-6 108' - 30" CL IV RCP @ 0.50% FES-2STA 236+95.89, 0.00'30" FESINV: 793.00 (SW)INV: 795.32 (E) INV: 795.32 (N) INV: 793.54 (S) INV: 793.54 (NE) SUMP: 789.54 S OCS-1 30"30" MH-5 30"CB-4A 30"6 7 8 230+00 231+00232+008 S MH-6 3 0 " FES-2 2 3 6 + 0 0 2 3 7 + 0 0 2 3 7 + 1 2 1 K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-STRM-PLAN-2.dwg 2/3/2025 12:45:09 PMSCALE IN FEET 0 H: 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709LOCATION: OCS-1 TO CB-4A 5 NC5.14 BACKYARD STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE 5N MH-6 TO FES-2 SEE SHEET C5.05 SEE SHEET C5.06 HEN S L O W E AVEN U E S H E N S L O W E AV E N U E S 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 805.85807.0240+00 806.80807.1240+50 806.30807.6241+00 806.24808.7241+50 806.36809.7242+00 807.34810.6242+50 807.66811.3243+00 243+50 CB-35 RIM: 805.67STA 240+04.89, 0.00' LTMNDOT DESIGN NINV: 802.67 (SE)- R-4342111' - 12" CL V RCP @ 0.40% CB-34 RIM: 805.90STA 241+15.83, 0.00'48" DIA CBMHINV: 802.23 (NW)INV: 802.13 (E)- R-4342CB-33 RIM: 806.02STA 241+59.05, 0.00'48" DIA CBMHINV: 801.96 (W)INV: 801.86 (SE)- R-434243' - 12" CL V RCP @ 0.40% 49' - 12" CL V RCP @ 0.40% CB-32 RIM: 806.06STA 242+07.67, 0.00'48" DIA CBMHINV: 801.67 (NW)INV: 801.57 (S)- R-4342118' - 12" CL V RCP @ 0.40% CB-21 EXISTING C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED PROFILE AT CENTERLINE EXISTING PROFILE AT CENTERLINE 8" DIP INV: 798.19 (W) INV: 801.10 (N) INV: 798.09 (E)98+0099+00S24"24"CB-21 12 "24"CB-32 12" CB-33 12"CB-34 12" CB-35 11678 1011 12 13 10 11243+33 240+0 0 241+0 0 242+00 24 3 + 0 0 7 K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-STRM-PLAN-2.dwg 2/3/2025 12:45:25 PMSCALE IN FEET 0 H: 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709LOCATION: CB-35 TO CB-21 4 7 NSEE SHEET C5.09 SEE SHEET C5.09 4 C5.15 BACKYARD STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE109TH STREET S 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 807.74805.9250+00 807.87805.7250+50 808.86805.6251+00 808.13805.8251+50 252+00 806.32805.4253+00 807.41805.4253+50 807.00805.8254+00 807.20806.2254+50 807.65806.5255+00 255+25 CB-115 CB-116 145' - 12" CL V RCP @ 0.60% CB-113RIM: 806.35STA 254+25.93, 0.00'48" DIA CBMHINV: 802.35 (S)INV: 802.35 (W)INV: 802.25 (N)- R-4342120' - 12" CL V RCP @ 0.71% CB-114 RIM: 806.20STA 253+05.93, 0.00' LTMNDOT DESIGN NINV: 803.20 (N)- R-4342CB-113 68' - 12" CL V RCP @ 1 . 9 6 % CB-24 EXISTING C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED C/L ELEVATION EXISTING C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED PROFILE AT CENTERLINE EXISTING PROFILE AT CENTERLINE 32' - 12" CL V RCP @ 0.50%12" DIP 8" PVC INV: 803.48 (E)INV: 803.32 (W) INV: 803.22 (E)INV: 802.35 (S) INV: 802.35 (W) INV: 802.25 (N)INV: 800.17 (NW) INV: 800.92 (S) INV: 799.92 (SE)SBS37+00 38+00 39+00 12"CB-115 CB-116 12"CB-24 12"12"CB-114 12"12" CB-113 4 5 6 253+00 254+00 250+00 251+00K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-STRM-PLAN-2.dwg 2/3/2025 12:45:39 PMSCALE IN FEET 0 H: 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709LOCATION: CB-115 TO CB-113, AND CB-114 TO CB-24 SEE SHEET C5.08 7 NC5.16 SEE SHEET C5.08 BACKYARD STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE HEMINGWAY AVENUE S 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 806.56806.6260+00 806.99807.0260+50 806.72806.7261+00 807.20807.2261+50 809.82809.8262+00 809.53809.5262+50 808.84808.8263+00 807.80807.8263+50 806.71806.7264+00 264+25 CB-30ARIM: 806.15STA 260+08.31, 0.00'MNDOT DESIGN NINV: 803.41 (N)- R-4342123' - 12" CL V RCP @ 0.40%91' - 12" CL V RCP @ 0.40% CB-30 RIM: 806.10STA 261+30.82, 0.00'MNDOT DESIGN NINV: 802.92 (S)INV: 802.92 (N)- R-4342CB-29 185' - 12" CL V RCP @ 0.50% CB-31 RIM: 806.56STA 264+06.67, 0.00' LTMNDOT DESIGN NINV: 803.49 (S)- R-4342EXISTING C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED PROFILE AT CENTERLINE EXISTING PROFILE AT CENTERLINE 12" DIP INV: 802.56 (S) INV: 802.56 (N) INV: 802.31 (E)92+0012"15"12" CB-30A 12" CB-30 CB-31 1 2 4 5 6 260+00 261+00 262+00 263+00 264+00 264+16 CB-29 K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-STRM-PLAN-2.dwg 2/3/2025 12:45:55 PMSCALE IN FEET 0 H: 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709LOCATION: CB-30A TO CB-31 SEE SHEET C5.08 2 N3 C5.17 BACKYARD STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE109TH STREET S 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 830 835 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 830 835 806.90810.9270+00 807.59812.1270+50 807.84813.7271+00 807.65813.7271+50 807.34813.2272+00 806.99813.2272+50 806.86812.0273+00 273+50 CB-6F RIM: 806.77STA 270+06.44, 0.00'MNDOT DESIGN NINV: 803.96 (N)- R-434260' - 12" CL V RCP @ 0.40% CB-6E RIM: 807.18STA 270+66.45, 0.00'MNDOT DESIGN NINV: 803.72 (S)INV: 803.72 (N)- R-434260' - 12" CL V RCP @ 0.40% CB-6D RIM: 807.18STA 271+26.45, 0.00'MNDOT DESIGN NINV: 803.48 (S)INV: 803.48 (N)- R-434260' - 12" CL V RCP @ 0.40% CB-6A RIM: 807.03STA 271+86.46, 0.00'48" DIA CBMHINV: 803.24 (N)INV: 803.24 (S)INV: 803.24 (E)- R-434265' - 12" CL V RCP @ 0.40% CB-6B RIM: 806.95STA 272+51.46, 0.00'MNDOT DESIGN NINV: 803.50 (N)INV: 803.50 (S)- R-434260' - 12" CL V RCP @ 0.40% CB-6C RIM: 806.43STA 273+11.47, 0.00'MNDOT DESIGN NINV: 803.74 (S)- R-4342EXISTING C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED C/L ELEVATION CB-6A RIM: 807.03STA 271+86.46, 0.00'48" DIA CBMHINV: 803.24 (N)INV: 803.24 (S)INV: 803.24 (E)- R-4342PROPOSED PROFILE AT CENTERLINE EXISTING PROFILE AT CENTERLINE CB-6F 12"12" CB-6E CB-6D 12" CB-6A 12" CB-6B 12" CB-6C 12"3 4 5 6 7 8 OUTLOTBWELLWELL270+00 271+00 272+00 273+00 273+29 67K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-STRM-PLAN-2.dwg 2/3/2025 12:46:08 PMSCALE IN FEET 0 H: 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709LOCATION: CB-6F TO CB-6C SEE SHEET C5.19 1 N2 C5.18 BACKYARD STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 809.94812.2275+00 807.80810.3275+50 808.80808.7276+00 808.33807.9276+50 807.43807.5277+00 277+50 CB-6A 175' - 12" CL V RCP @ 0.50% CB-6 EXISTING C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED PROFILE AT CENTERLINE EXISTING PROFILE AT CENTERLINE INV: 803.24 (N) INV: 803.24 (S) INV: 803.24 (E) INV: 802.36 (W) INV: 802.21 (E) 15" @ 0.50% CB-5 INV: 802.06 (W) INV: 801.91 (N)34+00CB-6 15" CB-518"12"18"CB-6D 12"CB-6A 12"CB-6B 12" WELL 277+30 275+00 276+00 277+00 6 7 66+0067+00S18"12" CB-10 12"CB-9 67 65 281+14 280+00 281+00 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 807.83806.7280+00 808.39806.6280+50 808.43806.4281+00 281+25 CB-9 RIM: 807.69STA 280+07.30, 0.00'MNDOT DESIGN NINV: 804.45 (N)- R-434288' - 12" CL V RCP @ 0.50% CB-10 INV: 800.85 (W) INV: 804.01 (S) INV: 800.85 (E)K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-STRM-PLAN-2.dwg 2/3/2025 12:46:32 PMSCALE IN FEET 0 H: 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709LOCATION: CB-6A TO CB-6 SEE SHEET C5.18 1 N 2 SEE SHEET C5.18 6 SEE SHEET C5.01 C5.19NCB-9 TO CB-10 SEE SHEET C5.04 SEE SHEET C5.04 BACKYARD STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILEHEMINGWAYAVENUE SHENSLOWEAVENUE S SB|||||||||||||||30+00 31+00 32+00 33+00 34+00SS 1 2 3 4 5 6 67891011 7 12 6EXISTING C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED C/L ELEVATION BEG HEMINGWAY AVENUE SOUTH STA. 30+00 PROPOSED PROFILE AT CENTERLINE EXISTING PROFILE AT CENTERLINE 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 808.73808.730+00 808.90807.630+50 809.42807.631+00 809.51807.731+50 809.19808.132+00 808.81808.132+50 808.26808.033+00 807.71807.833+50 807.47807.534+00 807.69807.234+50 -1.50%1.20%-0.75% -1.11% 0.75%PVIS: 30+00.00PVIE: 808.73PVIS: 30+16.00PVIE: 808.49PVIS: 32+50.00PVIE: 808.81HP: 31+34.22EL: 809.54PVIS: 31+22.67 PVIE: 809.77 AD: -1.95% K: 51.27 100.00' VC BVCS: 30+72.67BVCE: 809.17EVCS: 31+72.67EVCE: 809.39LP: 34+00.87EL: 807.47PVIS: 33+91.24 PVIE: 807.25 AD: 1.86% K: 53.84 100.00' VC BVCS: 33+41.24BVCE: 807.80EVCS: 34+41.24EVCE: 807.62K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-STRT-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 2:25:14 PMSHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709HEMINGWAY AVENUE S. - STREET PLAN AND PROFILE KEY NOTES 1.TRANSITION TO B618 CURB AND GUTTER ACCORDING TO DETAIL STR-12 AND/OR STR-13 2.PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP. REFER TO INTERSECTION DETAILS ON SHEETS C6.10 AND MNDOT DETAILS ON SHEETS C8.08-C8.13 1 2 1 MATCHLINE STA -SEE SHEET -34+50C6.026 HEMINGWAY AVENUE SOUTH (28.0' FC-FC WITHIN 60' ROW) SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 LOCATION:NC6.01 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER DETAIL STR-9 CONCRETE HYDRANT PAD PER DETAIL STR-37 SURMOUNTABLE D428 CURB & GUTTER 28' F-F 1 1 1 2 35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00 39+00SS64+5065+001 2 3 4 5 6 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 6EXISTING C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED PROFILE AT CENTERLINE EXISTING PROFILE AT CENTERLINE 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 807.69807.234+50 808.06806.935+00 808.44807.035+50 808.80807.036+00 808.89807.536+50 808.61806.637+00 808.23806.437+50 807.86806.038+00 807.60805.938+50 807.72805.839+00 -0.75%0.75%HP: 36+36.37EL: 808.90PVIS: 36+36.37 PVIE: 809.09 AD: -1.50% K: 66.67 100.00' VC BVCS: 35+86.37BVCE: 808.71EVCS: 36+86.37EVCE: 808.71LP: 38+60.02EL: 807.60PVIS: 38+59.91 PVIE: 807.41 AD: 1.50% K: 66.82 100.00' VC BVCS: 38+09.91BVCE: 807.78K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-STRT-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 2:25:28 PMSHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709HEMINGWAY AVENUE S. - STREET PLAN AND PROFILE LOCATION: HEMINGWAY AVENUE SOUTH (28.0' FC-FC WITHIN 60' ROW)MATCHLINE STA -SEE SHEET -34+50C6.01MATCHLINE STA -SEE SHEET -39+00C6.031 2 76 KEY NOTES 1.TRANSITION TO B618 CURB AND GUTTER ACCORDING TO DETAIL STR-12 AND/OR STR-13 2.PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP. REFER TO INTERSECTION DETAILS ON SHEETS C6.10 AND MNDOT DETAILS ON SHEETS C8.08-C8.13 1 2 SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10N C6.02 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER DETAIL STR-9CONCRETE HYDRANT PAD PER DETAIL STR-37 SURMOUNTABLE D428 CURB & GUTTER 28' F-F 2 2 1 HENSLOWE AVENUE SOUTH SEE SHEET C6.04 1 SB39+00 40+00 41+00 42+00 43+0093+0094+00SSS 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 16 5 EXISTING C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED PROFILE AT CENTERLINE EXISTING PROFILE AT CENTERLINE 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 807.72805.839+00 808.08806.139+50 808.46806.640+00 808.82807.340+50 808.93808.141+00 808.67808.641+50 808.29808.642+00 807.92808.442+50 807.62808.943+00 807.68808.743+50 0.75%-0.75%HP: 40+89.06EL: 808.93PVIS: 40+89.18 PVIE: 809.12 AD: -1.50% K: 66.82 100.00' VC BVCS: 40+39.18BVCE: 808.75EVCS: 41+39.18EVCE: 808.75LP: 43+17.41EL: 807.60PVIS: 43+17.41 PVIE: 807.41 AD: 1.50% K: 66.67 100.00' VC BVCS: 42+67.41BVCE: 807.78EVCS: 39+09.91EVCE: 807.78END HEMINGWAY AVENUE SOUTH STA. 43+15.91 K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-STRT-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 2:25:44 PMSHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709HEMINGWAY AVENUE S. - STREET PLAN AND PROFILE LOCATION: HEMINGWAY AVENUE SOUTH (28.0' FC-FC WITHIN 60' ROW)MATCHLINE STA -SEE SHEET -39+00C6.022 7 3 4 KEY NOTES 1.TRANSITION TO B618 CURB AND GUTTER ACCORDING TO DETAIL STR-12 AND/OR STR-13 2.PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP. REFER TO INTERSECTION DETAILS ON SHEETS C6.10 AND MNDOT DETAILS ON SHEETS C8.08-C8.13 1 2 SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10N C6.03 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER DETAIL STR-9CONCRETE HYDRANT PAD PER DETAIL STR-37 SURMOUNTABLE D428 CURB & GUTTER 28' F-F 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 11 109TH STREET SOUTH SEE SHEET C6.08 109TH STREET SOUTH SEE SHEET C6.08 35+0036+0065+00 66+00 67+00 68+00 69+00 SS S65+00 14 151617 2345 1 6 EXISTING C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED PROFILE AT CENTERLINE EXISTING PROFILE AT CENTERLINE 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 64+75 808.08806.965+00 808.01806.565+50 808.39806.466+00 808.66806.466+50 808.56805.967+00 808.20805.367+50 807.83805.268+00 807.45804.968+50 807.08805.169+00 -2.40%-0.75%0.75%PVIS: 65+00.00PVIE: 808.08PVIS: 65+14.00PVIE: 807.74HP: 66+62.39EL: 808.67PVIS: 66+62.37 PVIE: 808.86 AD: -1.50% K: 66.84 100.00' VC BVCS: 66+12.37BVCE: 808.48EVCS: 67+12.37EVCE: 808.480+25 0+50 BEG HENSLOWE AVENUE SOUTH STA. 65+00 K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-STRT-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 2:25:59 PMSHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709HENSLOWE AVENUE S. - STREET PLAN AND PROFILE K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-STRT-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 2:25:59 PMN LOCATION:MATCHLINE STA -SEE SHEET -69+00C6.05HEMSLOWE AVENUE SOUTH (28.0' FC-FC WITHIN 60' ROW) 7 6 KEY NOTES 1.TRANSITION TO B618 CURB AND GUTTER ACCORDING TO DETAIL STR-12 AND/OR STR-13 2.PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP. REFER TO INTERSECTION DETAILS ON SHEETS C6.10 AND MNDOT DETAILS ON SHEETS C8.08-C8.13 1 2 SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 C6.04 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER DETAIL STR-9 CONCRETE HYDRANT PAD PER DETAIL STR-37 SURMOUNTABLE D428 CURB & GUTTER 28' F-F 1 1 2 1 HEMINGWAY AVENUE SOUTH SEE SHEET C6.02 HEMINGWAY AVENUE SOUTH SEE SHEET C6.02 1 SB100+00100+026 9 + 0 0 70+ 0 0 71+00 72+0 0 73+0 0 S SS S S 100+024 5 6789 11 1213 1 10 EXISTING C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED PROFILE AT CENTERLINE EXISTING PROFILE AT CENTERLINE 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 807.08805.169+00 806.87805.669+50 807.03808.170+00 807.40806.570+50 807.78805.271+00 808.15804.971+50 808.53806.072+00 808.90808.172+50 809.28810.473+00 0.75% -0.75%LP: 69+53.21EL: 806.87PVIS: 69+53.25 PVIE: 806.68 AD: 1.50% K: 66.81 100.00' VC BVCS: 69+03.25BVCE: 807.05EVCS: 70+03.25EVCE: 807.05K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-STRT-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 2:26:12 PMSHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709HENSLOWE AVENUE S. - STREET PLAN AND PROFILENLOCATION:LOCATION:NMAT C HLI NE ST A - SEE S H E ET -69+00C6.04MATCHLINE STA -SEE SHEET -73+00C6.06 HEMSLOWE AVENUE SOUTH (28.0' FC-FC WITHIN 60' ROW) 7 6 5 5 KEY NOTES 1.TRANSITION TO B618 CURB AND GUTTER ACCORDING TO DETAIL STR-12 AND/OR STR-13 2.PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP. REFER TO INTERSECTION DETAILS ON SHEETS C6.10 AND MNDOT DETAILS ON SHEETS C8.08-C8.13 1 2 SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 C6.05 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER DETAIL STR-9 CONCRETE HYDRANT PAD PER DETAIL STR-37 SURMOUNTABLE D428 CURB & GUTTER 28' F-F 1 1 1 100+00100+0273 + 0 0 74 + 0 0 75+00 76+00 77+00 S S S S100+02100+251 2 3 78 9 10 EXISTING C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED PROFILE AT CENTERLINE EXISTING PROFILE AT CENTERLINE 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 809.28810.473+00 809.65812.173+50 810.03812.874+00 810.40812.674+50 810.77812.575+00 811.15813.075+50 811.35814.376+00 811.17813.276+50 810.79812.277+00 0.75% -0.76%HP: 76+01.14EL: 811.35PVIS: 76+01.36 PVIE: 811.53 AD: -1.50% K: 66.47 100.00' VC BVCS: 75+51.36BVCE: 811.16EVCS: 76+51.36EVCE: 811.16K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-STRT-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 2:26:25 PMSHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709HENSLOWE AVENUE S. - STREET PLAN AND PROFILENLOCATION:MATCHLINE STA -SEE SHEET -73+00C4.06MATCHLINE STA -SEE SHEET -77+00C6.07HENSLOWE AVENUE SOUTH (28.0' FC-FC WITHIN 60' ROW) 5 4 KEY NOTES 1.TRANSITION TO B618 CURB AND GUTTER ACCORDING TO DETAIL STR-12 AND/OR STR-13 2.PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP. REFER TO INTERSECTION DETAILS ON SHEETS C6.10 AND MNDOT DETAILS ON SHEETS C8.08-C8.13 1 2 SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 C6.06 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER DETAIL STR-9 CONCRETE HYDRANT PAD PER DETAIL STR-37 SURMOUNTABLE D428 CURB & GUTTER 28' F-F 2 1 1 1 109TH STREET SOUTH SEE SHEET C6.09 1 77+0078+0 0 79+00 S S SS 4 5 6 7 EXISTING C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED PROFILE AT CENTERLINE EXISTING PROFILE AT CENTERLINE 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 810.79812.277+00 810.41811.277+50 810.03810.078+00 809.66809.378+50 809.28809.679+00 -0.76% END HENSLOWE AVENUE SOUTH STA. 78+98.56 K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-STRT-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 2:26:40 PMSHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709HENSLOWE AVENUE S. - STREET PLAN AND PROFILE LOCATION:NM A T C H L I N E S T A - S E E S H E E T - 77 + 0 0 C 6 . 0 6 HENSLOWE AVENUE SOUTH (28.0' FC-FC WITHIN 60' ROW) 4 KEY NOTES 1.TRANSITION TO B618 CURB AND GUTTER ACCORDING TO DETAIL STR-12 AND/OR STR-13 2.PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP. REFER TO INTERSECTION DETAILS ON SHEETS C6.10 AND MNDOT DETAILS ON SHEETS C8.08-C8.13 1 2 SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 C6.07 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER DETAIL STR-9 CONCRETE HYDRANT PAD PER DETAIL STR-37 SURMOUNTABLE D428 CURB & GUTTER 28' F-F 39+0040+0092+00 93+00 94+00 95+00 96+ 0 0SSS1415 1 6 6 16 EXISTING C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED PROFILE AT CENTERLINEEXISTING PROFILE AT CENTERLINE 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 807.091+75 810.00808.492+00 809.37806.192+50 808.74805.593+00 808.11805.993+50 807.88806.294+00 808.22806.394+50 808.25806.795+00 807.94806.695+50 807.56806.496+00 -0.75%2.40%-2.40%0.75%25.00%-1.26%PVIS: 91+90.51PVIE: 807.63PVIS: 92+00.00PVIE: 810.00PVIS: 93+69.20PVIE: 807.87PVIS: 93+82.73PVIE: 808.19PVIS: 93+96.73PVIE: 807.86HP: 94+78.52EL: 808.29PVIS: 94+78.40 PVIE: 808.47 AD: -1.50% K: 66.51 100.00' VC BVCS: 94+28.40BVCE: 808.10EVCS: 95+28.40EVCE: 808.10BEG 109TH STREET SOUTH STA. 91+90.12 K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-STRT-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 2:26:53 PMSHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709109TH STREET S. - STREET PLAN AND PROFILE N LOCATION:MATCHLINE STA -SEE SHEET -96+00C6.09109TH STREET SOUTH (28.0' FC-FC WITHIN 60' ROW) 3 2 7 4 KEY NOTES 1.TRANSITION TO B618 CURB AND GUTTER ACCORDING TO DETAIL STR-12 AND/OR STR-13 2.PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP. REFER TO INTERSECTION DETAILS ON SHEETS C6.10 AND MNDOT DETAILS ON SHEETS C8.08-C8.13 1 2 SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 C6.08 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER DETAIL STR-9 SURMOUNTABLE D428 CURB & GUTTER SURMOUNTABLE D428 CURB & GUTTER 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER DETAIL STR-9 28' F-F 28' F-F 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 HEMINGWAY AVENUE SOUTH SEE SHEET C6.03 HEMINGWAY AVENUE SOUTH SEE SHEET C6.03 96 + 0 0 97+00 98+00 99+00 100+00100+02 73+0074+00SSSS100+02 100+25 7 8 9 10 1112 10 11 EXISTING C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED C/L ELEVATION PROPOSED PROFILE AT CENTERLINE EXISTING PROFILE AT CENTERLINE 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 785 790 795 800 805 810 815 820 825 807.56806.496+00 807.19806.196+50 806.92806.597+00 807.05807.897+50 807.48809.698+00 807.93811.498+50 808.37812.699+00 808.82811.299+50 809.45811.7100+00 100+25 -0.75% 0.89% 2.40%PVIS: 99+87.86PVIE: 809.16PVIS: 100+01.86PVIE: 809.49LP: 97+09.33EL: 806.91PVIS: 97+13.66 PVIE: 806.71 AD: 1.64% K: 60.89 100.00' VC BVCS: 96+63.66BVCE: 807.08EVCS: 97+63.66EVCE: 807.16END 109TH STREET SOUTH STA. 100+01.86 K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-STRT-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 2:27:09 PMC6.09 SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709109TH STREET S. -STREET PLAN AND PROFILE N LOCATION:MATCHLINE STA -SEE SHEET -96+00C6.08109TH STREET SOUTH (28.0' FC-FC WITHIN 60' ROW) 4 7 KEY NOTES 1.TRANSITION TO B618 CURB AND GUTTER ACCORDING TO DETAIL STR-12 AND/OR STR-13 2.PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP. REFER TO INTERSECTION DETAILS ON SHEETS C6.10 AND MNDOT DETAILS ON SHEETS C8.08-C8.13 1 2 SCALE IN FEET 0 H: 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 V: 5 10 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER DETAIL STR-9 CONCRETE HYDRANT PAD PER DETAIL STR-37 SURMOUNTABLE D428 CURB & GUTTER 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER DETAIL STR-9 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER DETAIL STR-9 28' F-F 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 8 0 8 94+0040+00SCB-27 RIM: 807.79 CB-25 RIM: 807.60 CB-26 RIM: 807.54 0" 0" 0" 0" 0" 0" 0" 0" 6" 6"6" 6" 6" 6" 0.7% 0.6 %0.6%1.3%1.8%0.1%1.1%0 . 5%1.6%1 . 6% 2.1%2.4%2.4%2.5%2.4%2.4% SW 08.23 SW 07.99 SW 08.00 SW/BC 07.75 SW/BC 07.69 SW/BC 07.77 SW/BC 07.73 SW/BC 07.68 SW/BC 07.65 SW/BC 07.88 SW/BC 07.92 R20.0'R20.0' 808 R20.0'FFF F4" 6"4" 6" 4"4" 4" 4" HP 07.80 GL 08.06 GL 07.83 GL 07.81 GL 07.57 GL 07.60 GL 08.06 4"4" MH 26 RIM: 808.19 GL 08.16 FG 08.53 GL 08.16 CB-28 RIM: 807.73 GL 07.71 GL 07.62 FG 08.02 FG 07.93 FG 08.46 FG 08.14 6" 100+02 100+00 CB-18 RIM: 808.76 SW 09.02 SW 09.08 SW/TBC 08.86 SW/TBC 08.67 SW/TBC 08.71 1.5% 0.7 %2.0%2.4%1.3%2.5% 3.0%2.4%0.8%0.9% 1.3% 0"0" 0"0" R19.0' R20.0' 809 80 9 SW/TBC 08.78 F F4" 6"4" 6" 6" 4" GL 09.35 GL 08.57 GL 08.70 6" 6" 4" HP 08.84 FG 09.23 FG 09.49 GL 09.13 GL 09.10 GL 08.92 FG 09.75 GL 09.38 GL 08.53 GL 08.51 FG 08.87 4" 65+00 35+00SMH-1 RIM: 807.74 CB-8 RIM: 807.63 CB-7 RIM: 807.50 SW/BC 07.92 SW/BC 07.95 SW/BC 07.93 SW/BC 07.84 SW 08.09SW 08.59 0.7%2.4%2.4% 1.5% 1. 4 % 1 . 6%2.2%0.9%0.6% 0" 0" 0"R20.0'808809 808 808SF1.6% 6" 4" 6"4" 6"4" 4" 4" 6" 0" 4" 6" GL 07.75 GL 07.67 GL 07.67GL 07.66 GL 07.45 GL 07.38 FG 08.08 FG 07.90 FG 07.82 GL 07.71 GL 07.45 GL 07.97 GL 08.05 FG 08.34GL 07.98 GL 07.55 30+00||||||||||||||||||S809810SW 08.51 SW/TBC 08.21 0.9% 0"1.9%2.1% 0" R20.0' 2.6% F 6" 6" 4"4" 6" 6" CB-3 RIM: 808.17 CB-2 RIM: 808.17 GL 08.51 GL 08.12 EG 08.50 EG 08.17 EG 08.96 EG 08.72 EG 08.26 809808GL 08.34 GL 08.34 FG 08.73 FG 08.81 FG 08.49 FG 08.40 SW/TBC 08.16 GL 08.49 FG 08.85 GL 08.49 K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000 C-INTS-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 2:28:22 PMSCALE: 1 C6.10 HEMINGWAY AVENUE S. & 109TH STREET S. INTERSECTION DETAIL NOT TO SCALE SCALE: 2 C6.10 HENSLOWE AVENUE S. & 109TH STREET S. INTERSECTION DETAIL NOT TO SCALE SCALE: 3 C6.10 HEMINGWAY AVENUE S. & HENSLOWE AVENUE S. INTERSECTION DETAIL NOT TO SCALE C6.10 INTERSECTION DETAILS N FEET 0 H: INSCALE 10'20' SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE597091.PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE MOST RECENT VERSION OF MNDOTS STANDARD PLAN 5-297.250 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS. IF RAMPS ARE DEEMED NOT COMPLIANT, CONTRACTOR WILL REMOVE RAMPS AND RECONSTRUCT COMPLIANT RAMPS AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 2.EACH SPOT GRADE ELEVATION IS SHOWN WITHOUT THE FIRST DIGIT OF THE ELEVATION. FOR EXAMPLE, LABEL 08.15 CORRESPONDS TO ELEVATION 808.15. GENERAL NOTES: LEGEND CURB HEIGHT PROPOSED LANDING AREA 4'x4' MIN. DIMENSIONS MAX 2% SLOPE IN ALL DIRECTIONS X" F S INDICATES PEDESTRIAN RAMP: SLOPE SHALL BE BETWEEN 5.0% MINIMUM AND 8.3% MAXIMUM IN THE DIRECTION SHOWN AND CROSS SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0% INDICATES PEDESTRIAN RAMP: SLOPE SHALL BE GREATER THAN 2.0% AND LESS THAN 5.0% IN THE DIRECTION SHOWN AND CROSS SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0% 965.77 965.77 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION HIGH POINTHP SIDEWALKSW TOP/ BACK OF CURBTBC SCALE: 4 C6.10 HEMINGWAY AVENUE S. & 110TH STREET S. INTERSECTION DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 109TH STREET S.109TH STREET S.HEMINGWAY AVENUE S.HEMINGWAY AVENUE S.HEMINGWAY AVENUE S.HENSLOWE AVENUE S. 110TH STREET S.HENSLOWE AVENUE S. 92+00 93+00 94+00 95+0 0 96 + 0 0 97+ 0 0 98+00 99+00 100+00100+02 ST-9 SB ST-11 ST-10 SBSB ST-9 SB 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 54 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 4 5 6 2 3 4 5 5 BASIN 2 OUTLOT D 38+0039+0040+0041+0042+0043+0073+0074+0075+0076 + 0 0 7 7 + 0 078+0079+00K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-SGN-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 2:28:44 PMC7.01 TRAFFIC SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN - NORTH N FEET 0 H: INSCALE 40 80 NOTE: STREET NAME SIGNAGE TO BE INSTALLED BY CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE. POSTS TO BE INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. POSTS MUST BE U-CHANNEL GALVANIZED. SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709MATCHLINE SEE SHEET -C7.02 109TH STREET S. HEMINGWAY AVE S. F&I PERMANENT BARRICADE WITH FUTURE ROAD EXTENSION SIGN PER COTTAGE GROVE DETAIL STR-31 & STR-32 F&I PERMANENT BARRICADE 109TH STREET S. HENSLOWE AVE S. ST-11 ST-10 ST-13 ST-12 SBSB SB SB 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 7 8 9 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 3 12 13 14151617 1 2345 10 7 8 1 2 3 1 6 6 7 12 OUTLOT B BASIN 1 OUTLOT A 30+0031+0032+0033+0034+0035+0036+0037+0065+00 66+00 67+00 68+00 69+00 70+0 0 71+0072+00110TH STREET S. MBX K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000-C-SGN-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 2:28:48 PMC7.02 TRAFFIC SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN - SOUTH N FEET 0 H: INSCALE 40 80 NOTE: STREET NAME SIGNAGE TO BE INSTALLED BY CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE. POSTS TO BE INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. POSTS MUST BE U-CHANNEL GALVANIZED. SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN 01/31/2025KYLE W. HOFF, PE59709MATCHLINE SEE SHEET -C7.01 110TH STREET S. HEMINGWAY AVE S. HENSLOWE AVE S. HEMINGWAY AVE S. F&I PERMANENT BARRICADE K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000 C-SDTL-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 2:29:18 PMC8.01 STANDARD DETAIL PLATES SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000 C-SDTL-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 2:29:49 PMC8.02 STANDARD DETAIL PLATES SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000 C-SDTL-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 2:30:17 PMC8.03 STANDARD DETAIL PLATES SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000 C-SDTL-PLAN.dwg 1/31/2025 2:30:42 PMC8.04 STANDARD DETAIL PLATES SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN C8.05 STANDARD DETAIL PLATES SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN C8.06 STANDARD DETAIL PLATES SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN C8.07 STANDARD DETAIL PLATES SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN C8.08 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN C8.09 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN C8.10 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN C8.11 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN C8.12 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN C8.13 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAJTW JMS KWHSJR AS SHOWN SS>S>>SSSSSSSSSSSSSS>>S>>SS|||||||||||||||||||||STSTSTSTSTST>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>SST>>>>>>>>>>||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||OHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPOHPEEEEEOHP OHP EE>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>STMH 109STMH 110STMH 111STMH 112STMH 113CBMH 118PLUG 109ACBMH 203CBMH 204CB 205OCS 117FES 301CBMH 302CBMH 303CB 304CBMH 305CBMH 306CBMH 312CBMH 307CBMH 308CB 310CB 311MH 5MH 6MH 7MH 8MH 10PLUG 6BPLUG 12ASTMH 108MH 9llllllllllllllllllllWEST BASINNWL - DRYBOTTOM - 800>PLUG 6Al 4SWO4RB3KT4HB4KT3RO3KT4SWOE2-3A4A5A7A8A10A11E2-7E2-2A12A9A6SS>S>>SSSSSSSSSSSSSS>>S>>SS|||||||||||||||||||||STSTSTSTSTST>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>SST>>>>>>>>>>||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||XXXXXX COWELLWELLCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOCOXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXTNH ELEV: 811.98 MBX TNH ELEV: 809.76 8" 8" 4" 4" 8" 8" 8"8"||XXXXXXXXXXXXX1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1314151617181920212223 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 PLANT SCHEDULE - 3RD ADDITION PROPOSED EVERGREEN TREE QTY NORWAY SPRUCE 74 PROPOSED OVERSTORY TREE QTY NORTHERN RED OAK 161 HACKBERRY REDMOND LINDEN SKYLINE HONEY LOCUST K:\019623-000\Cad\Plan\3rd Addition\019623-000 LP-LND-PLAN.dwg 1/27/2025 1:34:59 PMLS1.01NFEET 0 H: INSCALE 100'200'SHEET WSB PROJECT NO.I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.LIC. NO:DATE:REVISIONSNO.DATEDESCRIPTIONSCALE: PLAN BY: DESIGN BY: CHECK BY: 019623-000 LENNAR 16305 36th AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 JOE JABLONSKI PH. 952-249-3014 JOE.JABLONSKI@LENNAR.COMGRAYMONT VILLAGETHIRD ADDITIONCOTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTAAM AMKT AS SHOWN 01/28/2025ANDREW MASTERPOLE, PLA22226LANDSCAPE PLAN CITY LANDSCAPE NOTES 1.STREET TREE LOCATIONS AND SPACING ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON CONSTRUCTED DRIVEWAY AND UTILITY LOCATIONS. 2.FINAL TREE LOCATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE AND SPECIES SUBJECT TO AVAILABILITY. 3.TREES SHALL BE PLANTED 5' FROM BACK OF CURB IN A LOCATION THAT DOES NOT INTERFERE WITH CURBSTOPS OR INDIVIDUAL SEWER AND WATER CONNECTIONS. 4.NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. 5.DECIDUOUS TREES SHOULD BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 5' OFF ANY UTILITY PIPE AND CONIFEROUS TREES SHOULD BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 15' OFF ANY UTILITY PIPE. 6.NO TREE SHOULD BE LOCATED WITHIN 10' OF A HYDRANT OR 15' FROM A STREETLIGHT. 7.NO TREES SHOULD BE LOCATED WITHIN STORM POND'S 20' ACCESS ROUTE, AND NO CONIFEROUS TREES SHOULD BE LOCATED WITHIN 5' OF THE 20' POND ACCESS ROUTE. 8.NO TREE SHOULD BE LOCATED WITHIN A STORM POND HWL. 9.NO DECIDUOUS TREE WITH 5' OF A SIDEWALK OR TRAIL AND NO CONIFEROUS TREES WITHIN 20' OF A PROPOSED SIDEWALK OR TRAIL. 10.BOULEVARD TREES AND TREES WITHIN CITY OUTLOTS SHOULD CONFORM TO CITY'S APPROVED SPECIES LIST, AND SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 2.5" CALIPER. 11.NO TREE SHOULD BE PLANTED WITHIN DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT. 12.THE 10 SHRUBS PER LOT REQUIREMENT, SHALL BE PLANTED IN 2 PLANTING BEDS OF 5 SHRUBS EACH. PLANTS SHALL BE SPACED APPROX. 3-5' O.C. (BASED ON SHRUB WIDTH), AND BEDS SHALL BE EDGED WITH BLACK ALUMINUM EDGING OR APPROVED EQUAL. ALL SHRUB BEDS SHALL RECEIVE 4" OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH. 13.BUFFER AREA SHRUB BEDS SHALL RECEIVE SHOVEL CUT EDGE WITH 4" OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH. LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS (200 LOTS) 60' LOTS OR LESS : 2 TREES PER LOT MINIMUM (200 LOTS) ** 1 TO BE CONIFEROUS 10 SHRUBS PER LOT **TEN SHRUBS INSTALLED PER LOT (BY BUILDER) ** SHRUBS ARE NOT SHOWN ON PLAN - SEE LANDSCAPE NOTE #12 SINGLE FAMILY STREET TREE SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS: 60' LOTS OR LESS : 1 BOULEVARD TREE PER LOT, 2 BLVD TREES @ CORNER LOTS **200 LOTS TOTAL, ( 28 CORNER LOTS )= 228 TREES OUT-LOT BOULEVARD TREES @ 80' O.C. = 13 TREES TREE PRESERVATION REQUIREMENTS: TOTAL QUALIFYING HEALTHY INCHES 811" PERMITTED TREE REMOVAL LIMIT OF EXISTING QUALIFYING INCHES 203" 25% - Residential < 10 units / acre TOTAL QUALIFYING INCHES LEFT 608" REPLACEMENT RATE 1 PER 2 CALIPER INCHES 304 TREES TREES PROVIDED IN RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENT 400 TREES MITIGATION REQUIRED 0 TREES REQUIRED I PROVIDED 400 TREES I 400 TREES 2000 SHRUBS I 2000 SHRUBS 241 TREES I 241 TREES 1 5 7 4 12345612345 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 6 7 8 9 10 11 12123456 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 123 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 OUTLOT A 1 2 3 4 5 HENSLOWE AVE S 109TH ST S110th STREET SOUTH15 16 2 6 60' LOTS 60' LOTS 60' LOTS60' LOTS60' LOTS 6 60' LOTS 10 78123456 OUTLOT B60' LOTS PRESERVE AT PRAIRIE DUNES (BY OTHERS) TOTAL TREE COUNT PROVIDED ON PLAN: 641 TREES TOTAL SHRUBS PROVIDED ON PLAN:2000 SHRUBS 3 2 4 5 123 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 1 2 3 4 123456789101112 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 60' LOTS 45' LOTS 45' LOTS 60' LOTS12 60' LOTS 9 1 3 5 . 4 4 4 5 ' LO T S 24 25 26 27 123456789 3 60' LOTS 108TH STREET SOUTH106TH STREET SOUTHHENSLOWE AVENUE SOUTH HEMINGWAY AVENUE SOUTH HERON AVENUE SOUTH HINTON AVENUE SOUTH BASIN 3BASIN 4 105TH STREET SOUTHBASIN 2 107TH STREET SOUTHEX OUTLOT D HEMINGWAY AVENUE SOUTH Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 733 Marquette Avenue Suite 1000, Minneapolis MN 55402-2309 February 26, 2025 File: 193807374 Ryan Burfeind, PE Director of Public Works 8365 West Point Douglas Road S Cottage Grove, Minnesota 55016 Reference: Graymont Village 3rd Addition (Plan Review) Dear Ryan, Below are plan review comments for the Graymont Village 3rd Addition project submitted on January 3, 2025 and information submitted on February 4, 2025: General Comments: 1. Comments related to the storm water report with rational worksheet that was submitted on February 4th are as follows: • In the plans (Sheet C3.03), Basin 1 calls the pretreatment a forebay, while Sheet C3.04 calls the pretreatment a pond. Please make sure the naming throughout the plans is consistent. • In the plans (Sheet C3.04), the connection between the infiltration basin and pond is not clear. There seems to be an outlet structure in the plan view on Sheet C3.02- C3.03 but not in the stormwater basin typical section. Please identify and update the connection between the infiltration and pond. • In the Proposed HydroCAD, there are two sharp-crested weirs shown in the outlet for Basin 3. Please verify the outlet. • In the Proposed HydroCAD, Basin 2, Basin 3, and Basin 4 all have the sharp-crested weir and horizontal grate at the same elevation. There is concern with constructability of the OCS weir in relation to the proposed top grate elevation. • The P8 model outputs do not match the Stormwater Management Plans. Please update the values and provide P8 model inputs. Plat Comments: 2. Review and revise D&U easements encompassing pipes to ensure they are twice as wide as the pipe is deep, minimum of a 20’ D&U easement required (south side of lot 1 block 1, south side of lot 12 block 6, between lots 6 and 7 block 1, west side of lots 5 through 8 block 1, west side of lots 4 through 6 block 2, west side of lots 1 and 2 block 3, between lots 5 and 6 block 7, etc.). 3. Why are 20’ D&U easements shown between lot 2 and 3 block 1, lot 10 and 11 block 6, lot 12 and 13 block 7, lot 5 and 6 block 2, and lot 11 and 12 block 4? Street & Utility Plan Comments: 4. Add label for Hadley Ave S. 5. For sheet C0.01, move label blocking 105th Street on the north end of the project. 6. For sheet C0.02, where will the salvaged hydrants be placed that are referenced in note16? Verify record plan information for existing utilities. Include patching detail for 110th Street. 7. For sheet C1.01, include an existing typical section for 110th Street; for reference is sheet 9 of the River Acres Plan. Include information for savaging topsoil and aggregate backfill if it will be utilized. 8. Casting style R-1678 is not acceptable. 9. For sheet C2.02, verify building setback lines and drainage and utility lines for lot 7 block 7, lot 11 block 4, lot 7 block 4, etc. 10. How is the 110th Street drainage being dealt with? Maintain a minimum grade in rear lot swales of 2.0% (rear of lot 11 and 12 block 6, etc.). 11. For sheet C3.04, clay liner to be reviewed for any corrective areas. South side of pond to be corrected with impact of neighboring property and chicken coop. Developer to coordinate with neighboring property owner. 12. For sheet C3.05, replace 2024 detail plates with 2025 detail plates. 13. For sheets C3.06 and C3.07, show silt fence identified in the legend. Is the silt fence in place today from the site grading operation completed? 14. Verify all curb stops are located 1 foot beyond R/W when sidewalk is present. 15. For sheet 4.01, on the overall utility sheet show water services. 16. For sheet C4.02, the existing watermain on 110th Street is 12” DIP. The watermain on Hemingway Avenue is required to be 12” DIP (update size for watermain, fittings, and valves). Cut in a 12”x12” tee at the intersection of Hemingway and 110th Street, a wet tap will not be allowed. Include a 12” BV on the north and east sides of the 12”x12” tee. Label 110th Street. For reference are sheets 37 and 38 of the River Acres Plan showing the three residents that will be impacted during the connection of the new 12” watermain connection. 17. For sheet C4.03, three valves are shown at the intersection of Hemingway Avenue and Henslowe Avenue, the southern valve on Hemingway Avenue can be removed. 18. For sheet C4.04, three valves are shown at the intersection of Hemingway Avenue and 109th Street, the northern valve on Hemingway Avenue can be removed. Salvage hydrant and 6” GV located at northern connection point. 19. For sheets C4.05 to C4.10, consider increasing the sanitary sewer pipe slope on Henslowe Avenue and 109th Street (> 0.4%) to avoid flat slopes similar to the slopes installed in previous phases. 20. For sheet C4.06, adjust watermain to be further within the street and away from the curb near area of hydrant. 21. For sheet C4.07, insulate watermain if less than 7.5’ of cover (close to station 73+00). Three valves are shown at the intersection of Henslowe Avenue and 109th Street, the northern valve on Henslowe Avenue can be removed. 22. For sheet C4.07, if sanitary sewer is less than 18 feet of depth, SDR-35 is ok to use (between MH-52 and MH-53). 23. For sheet C4.09, place a temporary hydrant and valve at the west end of 109th Street. Relocate the 12” DIP WM to the south side of 109th Street to lineup with the western easement. Change the 12” cross at north side of 109th/Hemmingway intersection to a tee (8”). Place a tee (12”) on the south side of 109th/Hemmingway intersection , include a 12” BV on the west side of the tee. 24. Storm sewer pipes are allowed to be corrugated polypropylene (PP) dual wall pipe style except for the segment of storm sewer pipe between flared ends and upstream storm structure. 25. For sheet C5.01, can storm sewer in back yards of block 1 and block 6 be routed to storm sewer if mainline is positioned in Hemingway ROW? Relocate mid-rad catchbasins outside of curb radiuses. 26. For sheet C5.02, can the backyard drainage for block 2 be routed to CB-115? 27. For sheet C5.04, can the backyard drainage for block 6 be routed north? 28. For sheet C5.05, CB-12 must be constructed with a sump. 29. For sheet C5.06, can the storm sewer segment between CB-19 and MH-6 be rerouted to stay in the street and along property lines? 30. For sheet C5.08, can the storm sewer segment between CB-24 and CB-24A be rerouted to stay in the street (avoid storm sewer pipes being located within boulevards)? Can CB-29 be moved west and placed along the property line to service storm sewer N/S? Include sheet reference for 12” RCP pipe in lot 6 block 7. 31. For sheet C5.09, can the storm sewer segment between CB-21 and CB-18 be rerouted to stay in the street and along property lines? 32. There is a lot of 12” RCP pipe (verify size on rational worksheet). 33. For sheet C5.10, CB-3 may have to be constructed with a sump if storm sewer route is not adjusted. 34. For sheet C5.11, route N/S storm sewer west to Hemingway Avenue if possible. Route E/W storm sewer north to Henslowe Avenue if possible. 35. For sheet C5.12, route E/W storm sewer north to Henslowe Avenue if possible. Verify that FES-17 is not submerged. MH-2 should not be constructed with a sump, this would be very hard to access. 36. For sheet C5.13, can the storm sewer segments between CB-15 and MH-3 and also MH-3 and CB-14 be rerouted to stay in the street and along property lines? CB-12 must be constructed with a sump. 37. For sheet C5.15, can the storm sewer segment between CB-34, CB-33, CB-31 and CB-21 be rerouted to stay in the street and along property lines? 38. For sheet C5.17, can the storm sewer segments between CB-30 and CB-29 and also CB-29 and CB-31 be rerouted to stay in the street and along property lines? 39. For sheet C5.18, why are there so many catchbasins in this area? Can the grading plan be adjusted/modified to minimize the number of catchbasins? 40. For sheet C6.01, provide a detail for the cul-de-sac to the west and with new configuration. Note, the cul-de-sac will need to maintain current diameter and size for snowplows, school buses, etc. Additional roadway easement to the south side of lot 1 block 1 may be needed to accommodate for the cul-de-sac. 41. For sheet C6.02, trail width to be 8 feet rather than 10 feet. Align pedestrian ramp with the bituminous trail and include radius transitions for bituminous trail to sidewalk. Add alignment and profile for trail. 42. For sheet C6.10, cross slopes are not consistent (verify). Adjust flat areas to be sloped appropriately. 43. For sheets C7.01 and C7.02, show locations for park and open space markers; for reference is sheets 60 and 61 of the Graymont Village 3rd Addition showing the locations of the open space markers. 44. For sheet C7.01, remove stop sign at intersection of 109th Street and Henslowe Avenue. 45. For sheet C7.02, remove stop sign at intersection of Hemingway Avenue and Henslowe Avenue. Remove stop sign at intersection of Hemingway Avenue and 110th Street. 46. For sheet C8.01, remove plate SAN-4, is plate SAN-5 needed? 47. For sheet C8.03, are plates STR-18 and STR-19 needed? 48. For sheet C8.04, remove plate STR-27, is plate STR-20 needed? 49. For sheet C8.05, are plates STR-40 and STR-42 needed? 50. For sheet C8.06, is plate WAT-8 needed? 51. For sheet C8.07, is state plate 4003B needed? 52. For sheet LIT 1.2, adjust the location for the service cabinet to the west side of Henslowe Avenue at the property corner of lots 8 and 9 of block 4. Add empty conduit to property line along the south side 109th Street west of Hemingway Avenue. 53. For sheet LIT 1.3, add a residential light at the south end of Hemingway Avenue near 110th Street. 54. For sheet LS1.01, provide trees along the northside of 110th Street to provide screening between homes and street/cul-de-sac if space is possible. Regards, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. David R. Sanocki, PE Eric Vidden, EIT Phone: 612-712-2124 Phone: 612-712-2141 dave.sanocki@stantec.com Eric.Vidden@stantec.com 1 City Council Action Request 7.Q. Meeting Date 3/5/2025 Department Parks and Recreation Agenda Category Action Item Title Native Vegetation Management Service Agreement Staff Recommendation Authorize the Service Agreement with MN Native Landscapes for open space native vegetation management for the amount of $7,400. Budget Implication $7,400 from Park Maintenance, Street Maintenance, Stormwater and Hero Center operating budgets. Attachments 1. MEMO 2025 MNL Service Agreement 2. MNL Agreement Signed To:Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From: Zac Dockter, Parks and Recreation Director Date:March 5, 2025 Subject:Native Vegetation Management Service Agreement Introduction/Background The City contracts with MN Native Landscapes Corporation (MNL) each year to provide native vegetation management services at seven sites across the community. Services include mitigation of invasive species (spraying, hand removal, mowing), seeding, prescribed burns and site monitoring to assure our restored open space habitats thrive. Funding for this work is included in operating budgets of Park Maintenance, Street Maintenance, Stormwater and HERO Center. Staff is recommending authorization of the attached service agreement for MNL to manage sites at: 1. Hardwood Avenue 2. HERO Center 3. Highway 61 Roundabouts 4. Meadowgrass Park 5. Oakwood Park 6. Pine Summit Open Space 7. Cottage Grove Trailway Corridor Staff Recommendation Authorize service agreement with MN Native Landscapes for open space native vegetation management for the amount of $7,400. 1 City Council Action Request 7.R. Meeting Date 3/5/2025 Department Community Development Agenda Category Action Item Title Grant Award - Minnesota Historical Society Historical and Cultural Heritage Staff Recommendation Approve the Historical and Cultural Heritage Grant for the purchase of materials to install historical plaques throughout the community. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. MNHS Grant Agreement CC Memo 2. MNHS Grant Agreement TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator FROM: Riley Rooney, Associate Planner DATE: February 22, 2025 RE: Accept 2024 Minnesota Historical Society Historical and Cultural Heritage Grant Background The Historical and Cultural Heritage Grants Program, also known as Legacy Grants, were created to provide monetary support for projects which focus on preserving the history and culture of Minnesota. This program is made possible through the Minnesota Historical Society (MNHS) by the Arts and Cultural Heritage Fund (HF 1231) using sales tax revenue from the Clean Water, Land, and Legacy amendment. Discussion The 2024 Historical and Cultural Heritage grant was awarded to the City for the installment of Cottage Grove Historical Markers, or plaques, throughout the community . The historical plaques are intended to provide a unique opportunity to inform residents of Cottage Grove ’s vast history not only through digital media, but also physically through pedestrian travel. Each of the seven historical plaque locations were selected based on their respective historic sites’ contribution/ importance to the City’s local history and its proximity to pedestrian connectivity, including but not limited to paved walking trails and sidewalks. Each sign was created with the intent of providing a brief overview of the specific site along with one to two photographs, and a QR code that can be scanned to reach a city webpage that contains additional information and photos of the site. Minnesota Historical and Cultural Heritage Grant Cost Project Maximum CCIP Grant Approximate City Cost Approximate Total Project Cost Cottage Grove Historical Markers $ 5,546 $ 0 $ 5,546 Recommendation The City Council is recommended to approve the grant agreement for the Historical and Cultural Heritage Grant awarded for the purchase of materials to install historical plaques throughout the community. MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY GRANTS OFFICE 345 KELLOGG BOULEVARD WEST SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102 MINNESOTA HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE GRANT AGREEMENT City of Cottage Grove (hereafter called the Grantee) hereby signifies its acceptance of a state grant in the amount of $5,546 from the Arts and Cultural Heritage Fund through the Minnesota Historical Society (hereafter called the Society), in accordance with the guidelines for the Society’s Historical and Cultural Heritage Grants Program. The grant is limited to the following project: Cottage Grove Historical Markers (MNHS Grant Number: 2410-29764) as described in the Grantee’s grant application. Grantee may provide matching funds in the amount of $0.00 as specified in the application. All grant activities must occur between the project start date and completion date. The start date will be 01/01/2025. This grant will conclude 01/01/2026. This Project Completion Date is the date by which all project work must be completed. The Grantee agrees to administer the grant in compliance with the following provisions: 1.ASSURANCES a.The Grantee agrees that this project will be administered and conducted in accordance with Minn. Stat. 16B.98 for Grants Management. b.The Grantee must follow Minn. Stat. Chap. 177.41-44 regarding prevailing wage rates and contracts and corresponding Rules 5200.1000 to 5200.1120. c.The Grantee agrees that this project will be administered and conducted in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Archeology and Historic Preservation (as published in the Federal Register of September 29, 1983), the Historic and Architectural Survey Manual (June 2017), and the SHPO Manual for Archaeological Projects in Minnesota (July 2005). d.The Grantee agrees that work will be carried out by project personnel who meet the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards (as published in the Federal Register of September 29, 1983). e.Pursuant to Minnesota Session Laws 2023, Chapter 40, Article 4, Section 2, Subdivision 4, the Grantee must give consideration to Conservation Corps Minnesota and Northern Bedrock Historic Preservation Corps, or an organization carrying out similar work. f.The Grantee will acknowledge the support of the Society in materials produced and in programs or presentations financially supported by the Society. If intellectual property is created, the parties will discuss the allocation of ownership and use rights. g.Copyright to copyrightable materials, including computer software, shall vest in the Grantee with a non-transferable royalty-free license to the Society for its non- commercial use. The Grantee shall grant the Society an option to license any such material(s) it wishes to develop for commercial purposes on terms and conditions, including a royalty, as the parties hereto agree in a subsequent writing. h.Except for (a) the above limitation, (b) the Grantee’s right to control publication of its own research results, (c) patented and patent-pending property and (d) the Grantee’s confidential information, the Society will have the free, irrevocable, non-exclusive unlimited right to use any research results collected by the Grantee for any purpose. 2 i.The Grantee agrees that this project will be administered and conducted in accordance with Minn. Stat. 129D.17 for the Arts and Cultural Heritage Fund. 2.FINAL REPORTS AND PROJECT PRODUCTS a.The final report and project products are due within 30 days after the project completion date b.The final report must be completed electronically in the Minnesota Historical Society’s Grants Portal (https://mnhs.fluxx.io). c.The Final Product(s) to be uploaded with the final report are: Photographs of installed markers. 3.COST PRINCIPLES AND LIMITATION a.Only the items set forth in the Approved Project Budget (see Attachment A) may be charged against the grant project. b.Any project expense not specifically approved in the Approved Project Budget will not be allowed except upon written request by the Grantee and written approval by the Society. c.Changes in the Approved Project Budget may not exceed twenty (20) percent of the Approved Project Budget. Changes that occur after the project begins which exceed twenty (20) percent will not be allowed except upon written request by the Grantee and written approval by the Society d.Changes in the Project Completion Date will not be allowed except upon written request by the Grantee and written approval by the Society. e.All work will conform to the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards as outlined in the approved Scope of Work Form. Any change to the Scope of Work Form after it is approved must be requested in writing and approved by the Grants Office. f.No grant funds may be used to pay indirect costs, commonly referred to as overhead. g.Return of Unused Funds. Any unused grant funds not spent for the purposes of the Project by Final Report due date, must be promptly returned to the SOCIETY. 4.PROCEDURES FOR CONTRACTING SERVICES AND MATERIALS a.Any services and/or materials that are expected to cost $20,000 or more must undergo a formal notice and bidding process. b.Any services and/or materials that are expected to cost between $10,000 and $19,999 must be scoped out in writing and offered to a minimum of three (3) bidders. c.Any services and/or materials that are expected to cost between $5,000 and $9,999 must be competitively based on a minimum of three (3) verbal quotes. d.Support documentation of the procurement process utilized to contract services and/or materials must be maintained by the grantee and are subject to examination by Minnesota Historical Society, its designated representatives, or any applicable agency of the State of Minnesota for a minimum of six (6) years from the approval date of the Final Report. 5.MAINTAINING GRANT RECORDS FOR AUDIT a.The Grantee must maintain records and accounts consistent with generally accepted accounting principles, and to provide for such fiscal control as is necessary to assure the 3 proper disbursing of and accounting for grant funds. The Grantee must maintain records and accounts (including documentation of the procurement process) for this project on file for a minimum of six (6) years after approval of the Final Report. b.The Grantee agrees to maintain records to document any matching funds claimed as part of the project. The Grantee further agrees to secure reasonable written proof of the value of Staff or Volunteer Labor, and for Donated Materials contributed to the project. c.The Grantee agrees that accounts and supporting documents relating to project expenditures will be adequate to permit an accurate and expeditious audit. An audit may be made at any time by the Society, its designated representatives, or any applicable agency of the State of Minnesota. 6.ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SUPPORT a.For restoration/preservation grant projects, the Grantee agrees to post a sign during project work stating: This project has been financed in part with funds provided by the State of Minnesota from the Arts and Cultural Heritage Fund through the Minnesota Historical Society. b.All publicity releases, informational brochures, and public reports relating to an approved grant project shall contain an acknowledgment as follows: This publication was made possible in part by the people of Minnesota through a grant funded by an appropriation to the Minnesota Historical Society from the Minnesota Arts and Cultural Heritage Fund. Any views, findings, opinions, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the State of Minnesota, the Minnesota Historical Society, or the Minnesota Historic Resources Advisory Committee. 7.HOLD HARMLESS a.The Grantee agrees to hold the Society harmless from any loss, damage, or expense—including reasonable attorneys' fees and other costs of defense—arising as the result of any claim, action, complaint, or discrimination proceeding, or litigation of any kind whatsoever, directly or indirectly brought about as a result of the funded project; or, b.Each party will be responsible for its own acts and behavior and the results thereof. The State's liability is governed by the Minnesota Tort Claims Act, Minn.Stat.Sec.3.736 and other applicable laws. 8.MODIFICATION No person or body other than the Society is authorized to modify any of the terms of this agreement, including the scope of performance and cost limitations herein established. The Society shall not be liable for any costs incurred by the Grantee, which are not in conformance with the terms of this agreement 9.NONDISCRIMINATION a.The Grantee agrees that in the hiring of common or skilled labor for the performance of any work on the grant project that no contractor, material supplier or vendor shall, by reason of race, creed, color religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with 4 regard to public assistance, membership or activity in a local commission, disability, sexual orientation, or age, discriminate against any person or persons who are citizens of the United States, or resident aliens, who are qualified and available to perform the work to which the employment relates. b.The Grantee agrees no contractor, material supplier or vendor shall, in any manner, discriminate against, or intimidate, or prevent the employment of any person or persons identified in the preceding paragraph, or on being hired, prevent or conspire to prevent, the person or persons from the performance of work under any contract on account of race, creed, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, membership or activity in a local commission, disability, sexual orientation, or age. 10.DISALLOWANCES Any cost paid for with grant funds which is subsequently found to be disallowable under audit shall be refunded to the Society by the Grantee. 11.CANCELLATION The Society may withhold, cancel, or revoke in whole or in part the grant amount if it determines that the Grantee has materially breached any term or condition of this agreement. Grantees will be given a 30-day notice. In lieu of cancellation, Grantees may be given proposed remedies to ensure the successful completion of the project. In addition, both parties may mutually agree to cancel the agreement if they determine that the project will not produce beneficial results commensurate with further expenditure of funds or because of circumstances beyond the control of either party. In the event of cancellation, the Society may withhold proceeds of the Grant; demand that the Grantee return any already disbursed proceeds to the Finance Commissioner; and seek any additional legal or equitable remedy(ies). Finally, the Grantee hereby acknowledges that the proceeds of the Grant are being financed in part with funds provided by the State of Minnesota and administered through the Society, and that, per Minnesota Session Laws 2023, Chapter 40, Article 4, Section 2, Subdivision 4, the funding will be canceled to the extent a court determines that the appropriation, or portion thereof, unconstitutionally substitutes for a traditional source of funding. 12.SPECIAL CONDITIONS The Society may require special conditions to ensure that the project meets applicable standards. Conditions must be worked sequentially as listed below. 1. Grantee must provide documentation that the product(s) resulting from this project (final text, letters of critical review, and any associated research notes) will be retained in an appropriate repository and will be publicly accessible. (Upload to Milestone/Condition 1 report in the SOCIETY’S grants portal, https://mnhs.fluxx.io. Reviews may take up to 30 working days. Incomplete materials, or revisions to already submitted requests, restart the review clock.) 1 City Council Action Request 7.S. Meeting Date 3/5/2025 Department Parks and Recreation Agenda Category Action Item Title Kingston Park Building Final Design Service Agreement Staff Recommendation Authorize the service agreement with Oertel Architects for final design, bidding and construction administration services for the Kingston Park Building Project. Budget Implication Agreement proposal fees will be paid by the Park Improvement Fund. Attachments 1. 1-Memo-Kingston Plan Completion-Bid 2. 02.26.25 Final Agreement Kingston Park 3. 3-2025.02.21_Kingston Park_Final Design Fee Proposal_100-Bid-CA To:Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From: Cc: Zac Dockter, Parks and Recreation Director Kingston Park Building Project Team Date:February 26, 2025 Subject:Kingston Park Building Final Design Service Agreement Introduction In January of 2024, City Council ordered design services from Oertel Architects to bring the Kingston Park Building project concept to 90% design completion and provide cost projections. That work has been successfully completed. To move the project to a biddable plan set, a proposal has been received from Oertel Architects to bring plans to 100% completion and provide bidding and construction administration services should the City Council authorize plans/specifications and bidding this fall. Background The Kingston Park building design was done with the intent to accomplish the following goals: 1. Increase restroom capacity and functionality to handle large events. 2. Add a multi-use recreational room similar to other park buildings in the community. 3. Add space for general storage needs for events and programs. 4. Add serving kitchen to support event operations. 5. Accommodate additional picnic space. 6. Provide a unique design that differentiates Kingston from other park buildings while also complimenting the park’s landscape, events and programs. After initial concept review, City Council directed staff to leverage cost saving opportunities. Several value engineering decisions were implemented into the latest design to reduce costs. Perhaps the most visible change was to the shelter redesign. We have moved from one large shelter to a shelter “cottage” that houses three individual smaller shelters. We believe the shelter cottage concept is a superior design by allowing for simultaneous programming/rentals and improved pedestrian traffic flow while also saving the project about $400,000 in construction costs. Floor Plan Multipurpose Room 1,623 SF Garage/Storage 368 SF Mechanical Room 270 SF Restrooms 789 SF Family Restroom 136 SF Kitchen 367 SF Janitor Room 78 SF Corridors/Plumbing Chases 593 SF Total Square Footage 4,224 (* Additionally, approximately 1,000 SF of picnic shelter space) Plan Renderings Project Budget The project budget is as follows: Total Bid Day Construction Costs (w/escalation factor) $3,726,053 Shelter Cottage Construction Costs $200,000 Contingency $186,303 General Conditions $100,000 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $4,212,356 Soft Costs (Architectural, permits, fees, bidding, etc.) $260,697 Builders Risk Insurance $10,000 Construction Management Fee (Kraus Anderson) $447,650 Miscellaneous Contingency $50,000 Furniture/Fixtures/Equipment $50,000 TOTAL PROJECT COST $5,030,703 *Noteworthy, project cost estimate includes over $400,000 in contingency and escalation. Project Timeline The following project timeline is proposed: March 2025 Authorize plan set completion agreement (Oertel Architects) April 2025 Authorize construction management services agreement (Kraus Anderson) October 2025 Approve plans and specifications and authorize bidding December 2025 Award bids Winter/Spring 2026 Material Procurement July 2026 Begin Construction January 2027 Project completion Staff Recommendation Authorize service agreement with Oertel Architects for final design and bidding and construction administration services for the Kingston Park Building Project. 1795 St. Clair Avenue St. Paul, MN 55105 (651) 696-5186 www.oertelarchitects.com City of Cottage Grove – Kingston Park Building. Date: To: February 21, 2025 Zac Dockter, Park and Recreation Director, City of Cottage Grove CC: Project: Kingston Park Pavilion Project RE: Final Design: 100% Design Documents – Bidding and CA Activities Purpose This memorandum is providing the City of Cottage Grove a fee proposal for full design completion to complete bidding and ready for construction documents, as well as bidding and construction administration activities during the actual construction of the building. Project Understanding This part of the project design phase is to advance the final selected design scope by Cottage Grove to 100% design completion, with full project specifications for the procurement and construction process for the project. The project scope that will be advanced to 100% design completion is summarized as follows: ▪Main Building, with no attached or detached canopy structures to be included as part of the base scope of work. ▪Site work and site improvements will be reduced to a line approximately 30’ south of the main building to allow for the City of Cottage Grove to separately from this design and construction contract, to construct a series of pre-engineered canopy structures and the necessary site improvements between the existing playground and the improvements associated with the main building that is the subject of this design scope. Scope of Work – Final Design Stages 100% Design Completion Project Coordination Activities ▪Monthly Owner check-ins / progress updates ▪Bi-Weekly Design Team Progress Meetings – Coordination Meetings for Progress and Quality Control ▪Coordination of Owner provided services. Architectural Design Activities ▪Scope corrections and redesign EXHIBIT A 2 ▪ Completion of all code compliance checks and quality control and assurance procedures. ▪ Full Project Manual / Project specifications ▪ Front end (Division 00 and 01) by Kraus-Anderson ▪ Complete all Drawings ▪ All Drawings as previously noted. ▪ Construction Details ▪ Door Scheduling, including hardware consultation. ▪ Security feature incorporation and coordination ▪ Selection of final interior finishes Structural Design Activities ▪ Final sizing of foundations ▪ Structural sections and details ▪ Structural specification review and redlining ▪ Scoping need for special inspections nd construction testing (for budgetary purposes). Mechanical / Electrical / Fire Protection Design Activities ▪ HVAC System detailing and coordination. ▪ Code Compliance (Com-Check) ▪ Fixture and equipment schedule (HVAC/Plumbing) ▪ Riser and Connection diagrams and details (Piping, Plumbing, and Power) ▪ Complete Schedules ▪ Project Specifications 3 Schedule A tentative schedule has been outlined by Kraus-Anderson for the completion of design and bid documents, through the Construction process. Complete Bid Documents April 2025 – EO June 2025 Up to 12 Weeks Bidding and Acceptance October – November 2025 4 Weeks Construction / Contract Administration May 2026 through Completion 18-24 Weeks Project Team Oertel Architects Architecture / Sustainable Design Coordination Andrew Cooper, Principal / Project Manager Primary Project Contact Janneke Schaap, Sustainability Coordinator & Project Coordinator Project Coordination Maddy Peters, Design Lead Design production and coordination Design Support Staff as required Meyer Borgman Johnson Structural Engineering Emanuelson Podas Mechanical and Electrical Engineering 4 Scope of Fee 100% Design Completion $32,750 Architecture $25,450 Structural Engineering $2,800 Mechanical and Electrical Engineering $4,500 Bidding and CA $41,840 Architecture $29,840* Structural Engineering $4,500 Mechanical and Electrical Engineering $7,500 *This phase could be billed hourly not to exceed as an alternative for Architecture. Expenses $450 This expense fee includes all expenses for mileage, deliverable production (printing / presentation boards, etc.) Exclusions The above fees and our proposed scope exclude the following: 1. Sustainable Building Rating or classification processes 2. Civil Engineering and Landscape Design (to be provided by City staff, coordinated by Oertel). 3. Special inspections and construction testing 4. Site survey 5. Regenerative energy source design (delegated to providers in bidding / construction phases). 6. Hazardous Material Assessment and Remediation coordination 7. Permit Fees and applications. Conclusion Our design team is extremely excited to continue to collaborate with you on this project. We have thoroughly enjoyed the process with Cottage Grove and look forward to advancing this project! If you have any questions or need clarification, please contact me! Sincerely, Andrew Cooper, AIA – Principal, Oertel Architects Accepted: Signature / Printed Name / Title 1 City Council Action Request 7.T. Meeting Date 3/5/2025 Department Public Works Agenda Category Action Item Title 2025 Mill and Overlay and Hardwood Court Intersection Improvements – Approve Plans and Specifications and Authorize Bidding Staff Recommendation Adopt Resolution 2025-028 approving the plans and specifications and authorize bidding for the 2025 Mill and Overlay and Hardwood Court Intersection Improvements. Budget Implication Base Bid = $2,110,000 and Alternate = $215,000 - Road Maintenance Fund and TIF 1-12 Attachments 1. Mill & Overlay 2025 CC Memo 2. Mill & Overlay 2025 Plan Set 3. Mill & Overlay 2025 Resolution To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From: Genevieve Tester, Graduate Engineer Date: February 26, 2025 Re: 2025 Mill and Overlay and Hardwood Court Intersection Improvements – Approve Plans and Specifications and Authorize Bidding Background The proposed work for the Mill and Overlay Project in 2025 is to resurface Hardwood Avenue from 80th Street to 70th Street as well as the Timber Ridge 4th and 6th Additions and Pine Arbor 1st and 2nd Addition townhomes, north of 70th Street (CR-22). The 2025 Project also includes a traffic signal installation at the intersection of Hardwood Avenue and Hardwood Court, and trail resurfacing along the east side of Hardwood Avenue from Hardwood Court up to 70th Street, including a small segment of trail on the west side, at 73 rd Street. The project will be bid as shown in Figure 1. Hardwood Avenue , Timber Ridge, and the traffic signal would be included in the base bid. In the event of favorable bidding, the City will include the Pine Arbor neighborhood alternate. The annual Mill and Overlay Program focuses on replacing the top layer of pavement to lengthen the life cycle of the roadway. As projects are completed, any necessary ADA improvements to bring existing pedestrian infrastructure into compliance would be addressed as well. These im - provements would not be assessed to the adjacent property owners; the Roadway Maintenance Fund will be used for this project. The traffic signal portion would be funded by TIF 1-12. Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Jennifer Levitt 2025 Mill and Overlay and Hardwood C ourt Intersection Improvements February 26, 2025 Page 2 of 4 Figure 1: 2025 Mill and Overlay and Hardwood Ct. Intersection Improvements Project Location—Hardwood Avenue S., Timber Ridge, and Pine Arbor. Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Jennifer Levitt 2025 Mill and Overlay and Hardwood C ourt Intersection Improvements February 26, 2025 Page 3 of 4 Discussion The rehabilitation method proposed is to remove the top wear course layer of existing asphalt surface and replace it with a new asphalt surface. The distresses observed in the pavement point to a failing top layer of pavement, though the bottom base layer of pavement and the gravel base below the pavement are still structurally sound. Replacing the top layer of pavement will help to increase the lifecycle of the road; it is common with a mill and overlay project that any cracking of the roadway that has extended to the base layer will typically reflect through the new pavement within the first year. Minor spot curb replacement, utility repairs and adjustments, and ADA im - provements will also be completed as part of the project. If the project moves forward, additional information will be provided to neighborhood residents and property owners prior to construction. Construction would take place this coming spring and summer. The Hardwood Court traffic signal is justified by the existing horizontal and vertical sight lines on Hardwood Avenue that create a challenge for vehicles navigating this intersection which currently exists with minor-leg stop control. The sight lines on Hardwood Avenue are a result of the roadway design from the original redevelopment of TIF District 1-12. Current and anticipated redevelop- ment in conjunction with future improvements to 80th Street also indicate an increase in traffic volumes that would further impact the intersection and supports the need for greater traffic control at this location. See Figure 2. Figure 2: Intersection Improvements: The existing minor-leg stop controlled Hardwood Avenue and Hardwood Court intersection—the location of the proposed traffic signal. Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Jennifer Levitt 2025 Mill and Overlay and Hardwood C ourt Intersection Improvements February 26, 2025 Page 4 of 4 The Aurilla Apartment Complex (7689 Hardwood Avenue) and The View Apartment Complex (7675 Hardwood Avenue) were recently constructed in 2022 with new pavement and striping on Hardwood Avenue. This 775-foot stretch will not be milled and overlayed, and the proposed project will tie into this existing segment, as called out on the Street Improvement sheets in the plan set. The 2025 project, with the Pine Arbor alternate, will include approximately 3.6 miles of streets. Plans and specifications have been prepared in accordance with City standards and specifica- tions. The engineer’s estimate for construction of the project is $2,110,000 for the base bid and $215,000 for the alternate. City staff recommends that Council authorize bidding of the project. The bid date will be set by City staff. Council authorization of a specific bid date is not required by state statute. Recommendation It is recommended the City Council adopt Resolution 2025-028 approving the plans and specifi- cations and authorize bidding for the 2025 Mill and Overlay and Hardwood Court Intersection Improvements. St a t e H i g h w a y s 1 0 & 6 1 70th St. 80th St.Jamaica Ave.100th St. 90th St. St a t e H i g h w a y s 1 0 & 6 1Keats Ave.Kimbro Ave.65th St.Hadley Ave.Jamaica Ave.PROJECT AREA CITY HALL 2025 MILL & OVERLAY AND HARDWOOD CT INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS MYRON BAILEY DAVID THIEDE MONIQUE GARZA JUSTIN OLSEN DAVID CLAUSEN JENNIFER LEVITT RYAN BURFEIND KORINE LAND MAYOR COUNCIL MEMBER COUNCIL MEMBER COUNCIL MEMBER COUNCIL MEMBER CITY ADMINISTRATOR DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS ATTORNEY MAP OF THE CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE WASHINGTON COUNTY, MN PROJECT CONTROL NOTES: 1.ALL COORDINATES ARE WASHINGTON COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM 2.HORIZONTAL COORDINATES ARE BASED ON GEODETIC POSITION NAD83, 1986 ADJUSTMENT 3.VERTICAL ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON MNDOT NAVD 88 SPECIFICATIONS: 1.ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE'S STANDARD 2.SPECIFICATIONS FOR UTILITY AND STREET CONSTRUCTION, CURRENT EDITION FEETSCALE 0 2000 4000 HORZ. SHEET INDEX THIS SET OF PLANS CONTAINS 42 SHEETS R SHEET NO.DESCRIPTION GENERAL G0.01 TITLE SHEET G0.02 LEGEND G2.01 - G2.02 LOCATION PLAN CIVIL C0.01 HARDWOOD COURT EXISTING CONDITIONS & REMOVALS PLAN C1.01 - C1.02 TYPICAL SECTIONS C1.03 - C1.08 MNDOT STANDARD PLANS C1.09 - C1.10 STANDARD DETAIL PLATES C2.01 - C2.02 EROSION CONTROL PLAN C6.01 - C6.05 STREET IMPROVEMENTS C6.06 - C6.08 INTERSECTION DETAILS C7.01 - C7.04 SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN C7.05 TRAIL CLOSURE PLAN C7.06 - C7.17 SIGNAL PLANS 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com R SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214G001.dwg 2/26/2025 9:31:04 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 2025 MILL & OVERLAY AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL ANO SGL MJB 132214DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ANDREW N. OLSON 59327 02/26/2025 G0.01 TITLE SHEET EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC SYMBOLS CONCRETE GRAVEL HATCH PATTERNS GRADING INFORMATION 952 950 952 950 1:4 BITUMINOUS F F F F E E E E G G G G XXXXXXEXISTING PRIVATE UTILITY LINES STORM SEWER RECTANGULAR CASTING STORM SEWER CIRCULAR CASTING STORM SEWER FLARED END / APRON CURB BOX FIRE HYDRANT MANHOLE WATER REDUCER WATER BEND PROPOSED TOPOGRAPHIC SYMBOLS CLEANOUT LIFT STATION RIP RAP OE OE OE OE C C C C DRAINAGE FLOW BENCH BUSH CATCH BASIN CIRCULAR CASTING CURB STOP CATCH BASIN RECTANGULAR CASTING SIGNAL CONTROL CABINET CLEAN OUT DRINKING FOUNTAIN FLARED END / APRON FLAG POLE FUEL PUMP GRILL HANDICAP SPACE HANDHOLE FIRE HYDRANT MAILBOX MANHOLE-HEAT MANHOLE-ELECTRIC MANHOLE-GAS MANHOLE-SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE-STORM SEWER MANHOLE-COMMUNICATION MANHOLE-UTILITY PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON PEDESTAL-ELECTRIC PEDESTAL-COMMUNICATION VALVE POST INDICATOR PARKING METER LIGHT ON POLE POLE-UTILITY POST PICNIC TABLE RAILROAD SIGNAL POLE REGULATION STATION GAS TREE-DECIDUOUS SATELLITE DISH SIGN TRAFFIC WATER SPIGOT IRRIGATION SPRINKLER HEAD IRRIGATION VALVE BOX TREE STUMP TELEPHONE BOOTH TRANSFORMER-ELECTRIC TREE-DEAD TRASH CAN TRAFFIC SIGNAL VALVE WETLAND WELL TREE-CONIFEROUS GUY WIRE ANCHOR LIFT STATION LIFT STATION CONTROL PANEL MANHOLE-WATER BASKETBALL POST CULVERT END SOIL BORING ABBREVIATIONS A ALGEBRAIC DIFFERENCE ADJ ADJUST ALT ALTERNATE B-B BACK TO BACK BIT BITUMINOUS BLDG BUILDING BMP BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE BR BEGIN RADIUS BV BUTTERFLY VALVE CB CATCH BASIN C&G CURB AND GUTTER CIP CAST IRON PIPE CIPP CURED-IN-PLACE PIPE CL CENTER LINE CL.CLASS CLVT CULVERT CMP CORRUGATED METAL PIPE C.O.CHANGE ORDER COMM COMMUNICATION CON CONCRETE CSP CORRUGATED STEEL PIPE DIA DIAMETER DIP DUCTILE IRON PIPE DWY DRIVEWAY E EXTERNAL CURVE DISTANCE ELEC ELECTRIC ELEV ELEVATION EOF EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ER END RADIUS ESMT EASEMENT EX EXISTING FES FLARED END SECTION F-F FACE TO FACE FF FINISHED FLOOR F&I FURNISH AND INSTALL FM FORCEMAIN FO FIBER OPTIC F.O.FIELD ORDER GRAN GRANULAR GRAV GRAVEL GU GUTTER GV GATE VALVE HDPE HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE HH HANDHOLE HP HIGH POINT HWL HIGH WATER LEVEL HYD HYDRANT I INVERT K CURVE COEFFICIENT L LENGTH LO LOWEST OPENING LP LOW POINT LT LEFT MAX MAXIMUM MH MANHOLE MIN MINIMUM MR MID RADIUS NIC NOT IN CONTRACT NMC NON-METALLIC CONDUIT NTS NOT TO SCALE NWL NORMAL WATER LEVEL OHW ORDINARY HIGH WATER LEVEL PC POINT OF CURVE PCC POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE PE PERMANENT EASEMENT PED PEDESTRIAN, PEDESTAL PERF PERFORATED PIPE PERM PERMANENT PI POINT OF INTERSECTION PL PROPERTY LINE PRC POINT OF REVERSE CURVE PT POINT OF TANGENT PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE PVMT PAVEMENT R RADIUS R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY RCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE RET RETAINING RSC RIGID STEEL CONDUIT RT RIGHT SAN SANITARY SEWER SCH SCHEDULE SERV SERVICE SHLD SHOULDER STA STATION STD STANDARD STM STORM SEWER TC TOP OF CURB TE TEMPORARY EASEMENT TEMP TEMPORARY TNH TOP NUT HYDRANT TP TOP OF PIPE TYP TYPICAL VCP VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE VERT VERTICAL VPC VERTICAL POINT OF CURVE VPI VERTICAL POINT OF INTERSECTION VPT VERTICAL POINT OF TANGENT WM WATERMAIN AC ACRES CF CUBIC FEET CV COMPACTED VOLUME CY CUBIC YARD EA EACH EV EXCAVATED VOLUME LB POUND LF LINEAR FEET LS LUMP SUM LV LOOSE VOLUME SF SQUARE FEET SV STOCKPILE VOLUME SY SQUARE YARD UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND GAS UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATION OVERHEAD ELECTRIC OVERHEAD COMMUNICATION OVERHEAD UTILITY 953.53 EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR PROPOSED GRADING LIMITS / SLOPE LIMITS PROJECT LIMITS PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION RISE:RUN (SLOPE) OC OC OC OC OU OU OU OU H CP E WS CO L G E S D U W TRASH C H STORM SEWER OUTLET STRUCTURE STORM SEWER OVERFLOW STRUCTURE STA:5+67.19 980.87 C TRAFFIC ARM BARRIER VENT PIPEV TILE INLET TILE RISER SIREN ORDER MICROPHONE METERM ACCESS GRATE FILL PIPEF DOWN SPOUT BIRD FEEDERB ANTENNA AIR CONDITION UNITAC NOTE: EXISTING UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PROVIDED BY THE UTILITY OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW. NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, 1-800-252-1166 OR 651-454-0002. THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. THIS UTILITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-02, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA" UTILITIES IDENTIFIED WITH A QUALITY LEVEL : LINE TYPES FOLLOW THE FORMAT: UTILITY TYPE - QUALITY LEVEL EXAMPLE: UNDERGROUND GAS, QUALITY LEVEL A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL (A,B,C,D) DEFINITIONS CAN BE FOUND IN CI/ASCE 38-02. UTILITY QUALITY LEVELS: QUALITY LEVEL D: PROVIDES THE MOST BASIC LEVEL OF INFORMATION. IT INVOLVES COLLECTING DATA FROM EXISTING UTILITY RECORDS. RECORDS MAY INCLUDE AS-BUILT DRAWINGS, DISTRIBUTION AND SERVICES MAPS, EXISTING GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM DATABASES, CONSTRUCTION PLANS, ETC. QUALITY LEVEL C: INVOLVES SURVEYING VISIBLE SUBSURFACE UTILITY STRUCTURES SUCH AS MANHOLES, HAND-HOLES, UTILITY VALVES AND METERS, FIRE HYDRANTS, PEDESTALS AND UTILITY MARKERS, AND THEN CORRELATING THE INFORMATION WITH EXISTING UTILITY RECORDS TO CREATE COMPOSITE DRAWINGS. INCLUDES QUALITY LEVEL D ACTIVITIES. QUALITY LEVEL B: INVOLVES DESIGNATING THE HORIZONTAL POSITION OF SUBSURFACE UTILITIES THROUGH SURFACE DETECTION METHODS AND COLLECTING THE INFORMATION THROUGH A SURVEY METHOD. INCLUDES QUALITY LEVEL C AND D TASKS. QUALITY LEVEL A: PROVIDES THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF ACCURACY. IT INVOLVES LOCATING OR POTHOLING UTILITIES AS WELL AS ACTIVITIES IN QUALITY LEVELS B, C, AND D. THE LOCATED FACILITY INFORMATION IS SURVEYED AND MAPPED AND THE DATA PROVIDES PRECISE PLAN AND PROFILE INFORMATION. G-A G-A G UTILITY MARKER VALVE VAULT WW WET WELL YARD HYDRANTY BARRICADE PERMANENT TILE OUTLET |||||||||||| >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l EXISTING UTILITY LINES l l l l l l l l l l >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l PROPOSED UTILITY LINES >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> SURVEY SYMBOLS >>>>>>>>>>>> BENCHMARK LOCATION MONUMENT FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT CONTROL POINT TILE P >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SURVEY LINES o o o PAVEMENT MARKING AUTO SPRINKLER CONNECTION U WETLAND DELINEATED MARKER CONTROLLED ACCESS BOUNDARY CENTERLINE EXISTING EASEMENT LINE PROPOSED EASEMENT LINE EXISTING LOT LINE PROPOSED LOT LINE EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY SETBACK LINE SECTION LINE BUSH LINE TREE LINE GUARD RAIL FENCE-DECORATIVE FENCE RETAINING WALL WATER SERVICE WATERMAIN STORM SEWER DRAIN TILE STORM SEWER SANITARY SERVICE SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN PIPE CASING WATER SERVICE WATERMAIN STORM SEWER DRAIN TILE STORM SEWER SANITARY SERVICE SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN WATER TEE WATER CROSS WATER SLEEVE WATER CAP / PLUG WATER VALVE EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC LINES QUARTER LINE SIXTEENTH LINE TRAFFIC SIGNS BOLLARDB TEMPORARY EASEMENT CLVT LIGHT-GROUND POLE-BRACE SIGN NON TRAFFIC STONE MONUMENT VAULTV TRENCHLESS PIPE (PLAN VIEW) TRENCHLESS PIPE (PROFILE VIEW) 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com R SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214G002.dwg 2/26/2025 9:31:14 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 2025 MILL & OVERLAY AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL ANO SGL MJB 132214DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ANDREW N. OLSON 59327 02/26/2025 G0.02 LEGEND SPPSSS>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSLSS>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDl lllllllll llllllll l DSDS DDHHFSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>SSSSSSSS>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>l l l l l l l llll lllllllllll l l l l l l l l l l l l llll lll l lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll l lllll l llllll ll l lllll lWWlll l ll llllllllllll l llllMMMMMM DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDSSHardwood CourtHardwood A v e n u e KOHL'S MUDDY COW GOODWILL US BANK Hardwood Avenue SHardwood Avenue East Point Douglas Road S 6953 69756997 6982 7135 7190 7180 7175 7201 7145 8101 7304 7308 7312 7316 7320 7324 7328 73327331 7327 7323 7319 7315 7311 7307 7303 7571 7647 7703 75207560 7420 73417415 7480 7440 7689 7675 7750 7781 7200 7998 7990 7500 7460 7838 7851 7375 7350 7855 6851 6960 6948 6926 693969516973 6995 6980 6968 6946 6924 6690 6800 6850 Harkness Avenue Hardwood Avenue 80th Street7 4 3 1 7 4 3 37435 74377439744174437445744774496814-68306990-699868976859-6857-684968476835-70th StreetCSAH 226999 6995 6991 6987 6983 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com R SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214G201.dwg 2/26/2025 9:31:26 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 2025 MILL & OVERLAY AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL ANO SGL MJB 132214DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ANDREW N. OLSON 59327 02/26/2025 G2.01 LOCATION PLANFEETSCALE 0 200 400 HORZ.RLEGEND 2" MILL & OVERLAY ALTERNATE - 2" MILL & OVERLAY TRAIL RESURFACING BASE PROJECT BOUNDARY ALTERNATE 1 PROJECT BOUNDARY S S S S S S S SS S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SS S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SSS S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SS S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SS S S S > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>S SS S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SSSS S S S S > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>D D D D D D D D DD D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>lllllllll ll lllllllllllllllllllllll llllll l l llll l lllllllll lll l l llllllllllllllllllllll ll llll l lllllll l l l l l l l lllllllllllllllllM M M M M D D D D DD D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D DD D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D DD D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D Meadow Grass LaneH a d l e y Ci r c l e Hadley Avenue Timber Ridge Lane CourtTimber R idge Lane H a d l e y C o u r t Pine Crest TrailHadley AvenuePine Arbor BoulevardTimber Ridge DriveTimber Trail Lane Timber Ridge HollowTimber Crest DriveTimber Ridge Court65th Street S Hardwood Avenue STi m b e r C r e s t D r i v e Timber Trail Lane Timber Trail LaneHadley AvenueCOUNTY ROAD 74 70th Street S Pine Crest Trail CSAH 22 6909 6931 6953 6975 6997 7244 72507244 6982 7222 6987 6498 6450 6465 7447 6720 6731 6763 6730 6680 6678 6674 6677 6681 6685 6689 6691 669366956699 6519 6515 6511 6509 6507 6503 6501 6851 6960 6948 6926 7203 7199 7177 7155 7133 7111 7109709770757053 6809 6893 6915 6917 6939 6951 6973 69956980 6968 6946 6924 6902 6880 6868 6846 6824 70317019 7200 7168 7146 7124 71507128711471127100 7088 706670447022 9999 7192 6752 6740 6702 6690 6648 6626 6604 6592 6560 6552 6544 6530 6528 6522 6508 6500 6699 6677 6635 6603 6571 6798 6786 6744 69976985 6788 6990 6525 6521 7000 6690 731073127314731673187320732273137315731773197341 7365 7367 7369 7391 7401 7407 7411 7415 7419 743174337435743774397441 7443 7445 7447 7449 699969956991698769836814-6830 6990-6998 6897 6859- 6857-6610-66246600-7428 73887372-68006784- 6764-6780 7374-7390 73587342-67786762- 6742-6785 6759 6743- 6737- 6753 6729 6711- 6707- 6725 6699 6689-66426849 6847 6835- 68286786-7325732773297331733373356829- 6841 6819 6803- 7420- 6758 67566740- 66646656- 7340-7356 66526644- 6799- 6817 6789 6771- 6767- 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com R SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214G201.dwg 2/26/2025 9:31:33 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 2025 MILL & OVERLAY AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL ANO SGL MJB 132214DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ANDREW N. OLSON 59327 02/26/2025 G2.02 LOCATION PLANFEETSCALE 0 200 400 HORZ. R LEGEND 2" MILL & OVERLAY ALTERNATE - 2" MILL & OVERLAY TRAIL RESURFACING BASE PROJECT BOUNDARY ALTERNATE 1 PROJECT BOUNDARY H A R DW O O D A V E N U E Hardwood C o u r tHARDWOOD AVENUE KOHL'S US BANK GOODWILL MUDDY COW S P S S S >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>S S >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Dlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l lll llll llllllllllllllllllllllllC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-D C - D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-DF-DF-DF-DF-DF-DF-DF-DF-DF-DF-DF-DF-DF-DF-D F -D F -D F -D F -D F- D F- D F- D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-DF-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F- D F- D F- D F- D F- D F- D F -D F -D F -D F -D F -DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-D C -DC-D C -D C - D C -D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C - D C - D C - D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C - D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-DE-DE-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E - D E- D E- D E- D E- D E- D E -D E -D E -D E -D E -DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-D E - D E- D E- D E- D E- D E- D E-DE-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E- D E- D E- D E- D E- D E-DE- D E- D E - DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-D C - D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C-DC- D C- D C- D C- D C -D C -DC-D C -DC-D C -DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-D G - D G- D G- D G- D G- D G- D G- D G-D G-DG-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G - D G - D G - D G - D G - D G - D G-DG-DG-DG-DG-D G-D D S D S D D C HC H H C H HF Hardwood Court H a r dw o o d A v e n u eHardwood AvenueREMOVE CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN RAMP (TYP.) REMOVE BITUMINOUS STREET PAVEMENT (TYP.) SAW CUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (TYP.) REMOVE LEFT LANE MUST TURN LEFT PANEL REMOVE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PANELS REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER (TYP.) CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE RELOCATION OF PRIVATE UTILITY SALVAGE AND REINSTALL LANDSCAPING (INCIDENTAL) REMOVE SIGN & POST - 1 EA REMOVE SIGN & POST - 2 EA REMOVE SIGN & POST - 1 EA REMOVE SIGN & POST - 1 EA PROTECT EXISTING UTILITY (INCIDENTAL) REMOVE SIGN & POST - 1 EA REMOVE SIGN & POST - 1 EA REMOVE SIGN & POST - 1 EA REMOVE SIGN & POST - 1 EA 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com R SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214C001.dwg 2/26/2025 9:31:45 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 2025 MILL & OVERLAY AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL ANO SGL MJB 132214DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ANDREW N. OLSON 59327 02/26/2025 C0.01 HARDWOOD COURT EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALSFEETSCALE 0 10 20 HORZ. R SURFACE REMOVAL LEGEND: REMOVE CONCRETE SIDEWALK OR PEDESTRIAN RAMP REMOVE BITUMINOUS STREET PAVEMENT REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER TRAFFIC SIGN AND POST REMOVAL FULL DEPTH SAW CUT (BITUMINOUS OR CONCRETE SURFACE) NOTES: 1.EXACT LIMITS FOR REMOVALS WILL BE MARKED BY ENGINEER. 2.SAWCUT BITUMINOUS AND CONCRETE PAVEMENT AT REMOVAL LIMITS. ALL REMOVAL EDGES SHALL BE CUT PRIOR TO REMOVAL. LOCATIONS WILL BE MARKED BY THE ENGINEER. 3.ADDITIONAL REMOVALS AND SAW CUTTING AS A RESULT OF THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO PROTECT SURFACES SHALL BE COMPLETED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL ITEMS NOT DESIGNATED FOR REMOVAL. DAMAGED ITEMS SHALL BE REPLACED UNLESS REPAIRS ARE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 5.ALL CONSTRUCTION RELATED TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY REMOVALS. REMOVE PAVEMENT MARKING RESURFACE BITUMINOUS TRAIL PAVEMENT CL A CL C CL B R/W R/W 60'60' 14' RIGHT TURN LANE 14' LEFT TURN LANE HARDWOOD AVENUE SOUTH NORTH OF HARDWOOD COURT INTERSECTION 14' THRU LANE 8' PROPOSED 6" CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN RAMP EXISTING 3" - 4" BITUMINOUS 8" CLASS 5 GRAVEL BASE 12" SELECT GRANULARB618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER (SPOT REPLACE AS DIRECTED) 14' THRU LANE 12' THRU LANE 12' THRU LANE 2" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (SPWEB340E) 3" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (SPWEB340B) 10' INSET A VARIES R/W 60' 16.5' HARDWOOD COURT 6' PROPOSED 6" CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN RAMP EXISTING 3" - 4" BITUMINOUS 8" CLASS 5 GRAVEL BASE 12" SELECT GRANULARB618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER (SPOT REPLACE AS DIRECTED) INSET A VARIES R/W 16.5'6' VARIES VARIES R/W R/W 60'60' 13' THRU LANE 12' THRU LANE HARDWOOD AVENUE SOUTH SOUTH OF HARDWOOD COURT INTERSECTION 14' RIGHT TURN LANE 9' VARIES EXISTING 3" - 4" BITUMINOUS 8" CLASS 5 GRAVEL BASE 12" SELECT GRANULARB618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER (SPOT REPLACE AS DIRECTED) 12' THRU LANE 13' THRU LANE 14' LEFT TURN LANE 10' INSET A VARIESVARIES 8" EXISTING AGGREGATE BASE (SUPPLEMENT AS DIRECTED) 12" EXISTING SELECT GRANULAR BORROW CL D VARIES R/W VARIES VARIES HARDWOOD AVENUE SOUTH HARDWOOD COURT TO 70TH STREET 8' EXISTING 8' BITUMINOUS TRAIL EXISTING 3" - 5" BITUMINOUS 8" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE 12" SELECT GRANULAR B618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER INSET B VARIES R/W VARIES 10' INSET A - BITUMINOUS STREET PATCH (HARDWOOD AVENUE) PROPOSED 6" CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN RAMP 2" TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (SPWEB340E) 3" EXISTING NON-WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (ACTUAL DEPTH VARIES) 8" EXISTING AGGREGATE BASE (SUPPLEMENT AS DIRECTED) 12" EXISTING SELECT GRANULAR BORROW INSET B - BITUMINOUS STREET - HARDWOOD AVENUE (MILL & OVERLAY) 3" TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (SPWEA230C) INSET C - RECONSTRUCT BITUMINOUS TRAIL APPROX. 6" EXISTING AGGREGATE BASE (SUPPLEMENT WITH CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE AS DIRECTED) INSET C INSET B INSET B 8' PROPOSED 6" CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN RAMP INSET A 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com R SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214C101.dwg 2/26/2025 9:31:50 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 2025 MILL & OVERLAY AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL ANO SGL MJB 132214DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ANDREW N. OLSON 59327 02/26/2025 C1.01 TYPICAL SECTIONS CL F 2.4% R/W 30' 16.33' RESIDENTIAL 32.67' F-F SECTION TIMBER CREST DRIVE TIMBER TRAIL LANE TIMBER RIDGE HOLLOW TIMBER RIDGE DRIVE PINE CREST TRAIL B618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER INSET E 2.4% R/W 16.33'6' 30' 6.67' 2% CL 2.4% R/W 30' 16' B618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER INSET E 2.4% R/W 16'6' EXISTING 6" CONCRETE SIDEWALK 30' 7' 2% EXISTING 6" CONCRETE SIDEWALK H RESIDENTIAL 32' F-F SECTION HADLEY AVENUE HADLEY COURT HADLEY CIRCLE TIMBER RIDGE LANE TIMBER RIDGE LANE COURT TIMBER RIDGE COURT TIMBER TRAIL LANE (MEADOW GRASS LANE TO HADLEY AVENUE) - INSET F CL E 2.4% R/W 40' 19.33' HARDWOOD AVENUE NORTH OF 70TH STREET B618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER INSET D 2.4% R/W 19.33'6' 40' 6.67' 2% EXISTING 6" CONCRETE SIDEWALK EXISTING 3"-4" BITUMINOUS 8"-10" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE 12" SELECT GRANULAR EXISTING 3"-4" BITUMINOUS 8"-10" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE 12" SELECT GRANULAR 2" TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (SPWEA330B) INSET E - BITUMINOUS STREET (MILL & OVERLAY) 1.5" EXISTING NON-WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (ACTUAL DEPTH VARIES) 9.5" EXISTING AGGREGATE BASE (SUPPLEMENT AS DIRECTED) 12" EXISTING SELECT GRANULAR BORROW 2" TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (SPWEA330B) INSET D - BITUMINOUS STREET (MILL & OVERLAY) 1.5" EXISTING NON-WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (ACTUAL DEPTH VARIES) 6" EXISTING AGGREGATE BASE (SUPPLEMENT AS DIRECTED) 12" EXISTING SELECT GRANULAR BORROW 2" TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (SPWEA330B) INSET F - BITUMINOUS STREET (MILL & OVERLAY) 1.5" EXISTING NON-WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (ACTUAL DEPTH VARIES) 8" EXISTING AGGREGATE BASE (SUPPLEMENT AS DIRECTED) 12" EXISTING SELECT GRANULAR BORROW EXISTING 3"-4" BITUMINOUS 5"-7" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE 12" SELECT GRANULAR TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1.PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION SIGNAGE AT ENTRANCES TO SITE: " CONSTRUCTION ZONE" (INCIDENTAL TO TRAFFIC CONTROL BID ITEM). 2.REMOVE AND REPLACE CONCRETE CURB AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER. 3.REMOVE AND REPLACE SIDEWALKS AND PEDESTRIAN RAMPS AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER. 4.PATCH BITUMINOUS TRAILS. 5.RESTORE DISTURBED AREAS WITH SEED AND HYDRAULIC MATRIX TYPE MULCH. 6.MILL 2 INCHES EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. PROTECT EXISTING CURB FROM DAMAGE (INCIDENTAL). 7.MILL AROUND AND PROTECT EXISTING STRUCTURES LOCATED WITHIN PAVEMENT UNLESS NOTED TO BE ADJUSTED IN THE DRAWINGS OR AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER 8.REMOVE AND REPLACE DAMAGED BITUMINOUS LOWER WEARING COURSE AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER. 9.PAVE BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE. 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com R SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214C101.dwg 2/26/2025 9:31:51 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 2025 MILL & OVERLAY AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL ANO SGL MJB 132214DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ANDREW N. OLSON 59327 02/26/2025 C1.02 TYPICAL SECTIONS 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com R SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214C102.dwg 2/26/2025 9:32:02 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 2025 MILL & OVERLAY AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL ANO SGL MJB 132214 C1.03 MNDOT PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com R SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214C102.dwg 2/26/2025 9:32:07 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 2025 MILL & OVERLAY AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL ANO SGL MJB 132214 C1.04 MNDOT PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com R SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214C102.dwg 2/26/2025 9:32:12 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 2025 MILL & OVERLAY AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL ANO SGL MJB 132214 C1.05 MNDOT PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com R SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214C102.dwg 2/26/2025 9:32:17 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 2025 MILL & OVERLAY AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL ANO SGL MJB 132214 C1.06 MNDOT PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com R SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214C102.dwg 2/26/2025 9:32:22 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 2025 MILL & OVERLAY AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL ANO SGL MJB 132214 C1.07 MNDOT PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com R SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214C102.dwg 2/26/2025 9:32:27 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 2025 MILL & OVERLAY AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL ANO SGL MJB 132214 C1.08 MNDOT PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS MACHINE SLICE 8"-12" DEPTH (PLUS 6" FLAP) TRENCH MUST BE COMPACTED BY LIGHT EQUIPMENT PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF STEEL POSTS. NOTE: HEAVY-DUTY SILT FENCE INSTALLATION METHODS SHOULD BE USED WHEN DIRECTED BY THE CITY. POST NOTCHES TO FACE AWAY FROM FABRIC. ERO-1 MACHINE SLICED SILT FENCE STEEL FENCE POST (T-POST), MINIMUM 5' LONG, 6' MAXIMUM SPACING. DIRECTION OF SU R F A C E F L O W GEOTEXTILE FABRIC ATTACH FABRIC TO POSTS WITH MINIMUM 4 FASTENERS PER POST IN TOP 8" OF FABRIC. 24" MINIMUM POST EMBEDMENT PLATE NO. STANDARD DETAILS COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA JANUARY 2023 OVERFLOW IS HALF OF THE CURB BOX HEIGHT OVERFLOW AT TOP OF FILTER ASSEMBLY OVERFLOW IS HALF OF THE CURB BOX HEIGHT DEFLECTOR PLATE HIGH-FLOW FABRIC FILTER ASSEMBLY DIAMETER, 6" ON-GRADE 10" AT LOW POINT NOTE: USE WIMCO ROAD DRAIN CG-23 OR CG-3290-VB (DEPENDING ON CASTING TYPE) HIGH FLOW INLET PROTECTION CURB AND GUTTER MODELS, OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. ERO-9 INLET PROTECTION CATCH BASIN INSERT EXISTING CURB CURB PLATE NO. STANDARD DETAILS COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA JANUARY 2023 STR-9 TYPICAL BITUMINOUS TRAIL AND CONCRETE SIDEWALK SECTIONS PLATE NO. STANDARD DETAILS COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 3" TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,C) (SPWEA230C) 6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE (VIRGIN) EXCAVATION AND ADDITIONAL AGGREGATE BACKFILL (AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER) 8' 0.5' 0.5' MINIMUM 2' WIDE SHOULDER BITUMINOUS TRAIL CONCRETE SIDEWALK 6" TYPE 3F52A CONCRETE 4" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE (VIRGIN) EXCAVATION AND ADDITIONAL AGGREGATE BACKFILL (AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER) MINIMUM 2' WIDE SHOULDER 0.5' 0.5' 5' SEE TYP. SECTION 1.5% TYP 2% MAX 1 : 3 M A X 1 : 50 M I N 1 : 3 M A X 1 : 50 M I N 1 : 50 M I N 1 : 3 M A X MINIMUM 5' WIDE SHOULDER 1 : 3 M A X 1 : 50 M I N MINIMUM 5' WIDE SHOULDER NOTE: ALL CONCRETE SIDEWALK JOINTS SHALL BE TOOLED JANUARY 2023 1.5% TYP 2% MAX 7"1 14 CURB AND GUTTER STR-10 FACE OF CURB DISTANCE TO L VARIABLE6" 1/2"R 13 1/2"6"8"18" SLOPE 3/4" PER FT 1/2"R 3"R C FACE OF CURB SLOPE 3/4" PER FT 3 1 13 1/2"R 4"10 3/4"12"12" 12" FACE OF CURB 16"6"14 1 1/2"R 10 1/2"68"R28"R12"R4"1/2"R 10 1/2"17 1/2"11" 14 1 7"1/2"R 3/4"SURMOUNTABLE D-428 MOD SURMOUNTABLE D-412 MOD MNDOT B618 MOD7"1 14 FACE OF CURB DISTANCE TO L VARIABLE6" 1/2"R 11 1/2"4"8"18" SLOPE 3/4" PER FT 1/2"R 3"R C MNDOT B418 MOD PLATE NO. STANDARD DETAILS COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA JANUARY 2023 STR-12 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER TRANSITION CATCH BASIN AT P.C. OR P.T. CATCH BASIN IN RADIUS DOUBLE CATCH BASIN SECTION A-A SURMOUNTABLE C & G M.H.D. B618 CONC. C & G 7" 6" 10'2"4" 6" 10' TRANSITION 8'5'P.C.SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTERRADIUS VARIESB618 CURB & GUTTER B618 CURB & GUTTER A RADIUS VARIESP.C.10' TRANSITION SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER A SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER 10' TRANSITION 5'P.C.RADIUS VARIESB618 CURB & GUTTER PLATE NO. STANDARD DETAILS COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA JANUARY 2023 STR-14 B618 CURB AND GUTTER CONSTRUCTION AT CATCHBASIN A A FLOW FLOW EX P A N S I O N J O I N T EX P A N S I O N J O I N T EXPANSION JOINTISOMETRIC EXPANSION JOINTSECTION A-A CATCHBASIN FRAME AND COVER AS SPECIFIED B618 CONC. CURB & GUTTER 10' MI N. T R A N SI TI O N 3'-0" 10' MI N. T R A N SI TI O N NOTES: 1. CATCHBASIN TO BE DEPRESSED 1" BELOW DESIGN GUTTER LINE GRADE 2.4" MAXIMUM CURB INLET OPENING TOP OF CURB 10' MIN. TRANSITION 10' MIN. TRANSITION FRAME & CASTING DESIGN GUTTER LINE GRADE 1" 132214C101.dwg PLATE NO. STANDARD DETAILS COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA JANUARY 2023 STR-19 CONCRETE CURB REPLACEMENT EXISTING YARD REMOVE & REPLACE EXISTING RESTORATION WITH 4" TOPSOIL 2.0'MIN.1 PANEL-10'2'2' EXISTING BITUMINOUS SURFACE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER SAWCUT 1/4"/FT. MIN. 4" TOPSOIL AND RESTORATIONREPLACE EXISTING BITUMINOUS SURFACE SECTION LC PLATE NO. STANDARD DETAILS COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA EXISTING CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER BACK OF CURB REMOVE EXISTING BITUMINOUS CONTRACTION JOINT REPLACE CURB DAMAGE JANUARY 2023 CATCHBASIN AND MANHOLE ADJUSTMENT STR-23 CATCH BASIN STRUCTURE WITH TOP SLAB OR 2' X 3' BOX. MANHOLE STRUCTURE WITH TOP SLAB OR CONE SECTION. FILTER FABRIC NEENAH R-3067-VB CATCH BASIN FRAME AND GRATE. SHALL BE FURNISHED WITH CURB INLET BOX AND 3" DIA FRONT FACE AND 4" MAX OPENING. HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) ADJUSTMENT RINGS. MIN HEIGHT 3", MAX HEIGHT 12". NEENAH R1642B MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER. SHALL BE FURNISHED WITH 2 CONCEALED PICK HOLES AND STAMPED "SANITARY SEWER" OR "STORM SEWER". HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) ADJUSTMENT RINGS. MIN HEIGHT 3", MAX HEIGHT 12". 132214C101.dwg PLATE NO. STANDARD DETAILS COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA JANUARY 2023 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com R SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214C101.dwg 2/26/2025 9:32:36 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 2025 MILL & OVERLAY AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL ANO SGL MJB 132214DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ANDREW N. OLSON 59327 02/26/2025 C1.09 STANDARD DETAIL PLATES STR-36 TYPICAL TRAFFIC SIGN INSTALLATION MEDIAN PLATE NO. STANDARD DETAILS COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA SIGN PANELS AS SPECIFIED OR AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS OR SIGN LEGEND. STREET SIGNS CONCRETE 2" x 2" x 12 ga. TELESPAR GALVANIZED SIGN POST 1 3 4" x 3' x 12 ga. INTERIOR SLEEVE SURFACE MOUNT ANCHOR BASE JANUARY 2023 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com R SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214C101.dwg 2/26/2025 9:32:41 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 2025 MILL & OVERLAY AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL ANO SGL MJB 132214DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ANDREW N. OLSON 59327 02/26/2025 C1.10 STANDARD DETAIL PLATES SPPSSS>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSLSS>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDl lllllllll llllllll l C-DC-DF-DF-DF -DF-DF-DC-DC-DC-DE-DE-DE-DE-DC-DC-DC-DG-DG-DG-DG-DDSDS DDCHCHHCHHFSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>SSS>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>l l l l l l llll lll l l l l l l l l l l ll llllllllllllllllllllll l lll l l l ll l ll ll l lllllllMMMDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDSSKOHL'S US BANK GOODWILL MUDDY COW Pine Crest Trail Timber Ridge Drive Timber Ridge Hollow Hardwood Avenue S Hard w o o d A v e n u e East Point Douglas Road S Harkness Avenue S Hardwood Court80th Street SHardwood Avenue Harkness Avenue S 73rd Street SS Red PineRoadC S A H 2270th Street S690969316953 69756997 6982 7401740774117415741974317 4 3 37435 74377439744174437445744774496814-68306990-69986859-68286786-6829-7304 7308 7312 7316 7320 7324 7328 7332 733673397335 7331 7327 7323 7319 7315 7311 7307 7303 7571 7647 7703 7520 7560 7420 73417415 7480 7440 7689 7675 7071 7750 7781 7200 7998 7990 7460 7920 7838 7851 7375 7350 7855 6851 6960 6948 6926 7203 69176939695169736995 6999 6995 6991 6987 6983 EROSION CONTROL LEGEND INLET PROTECTION 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com R SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214C201.dwg 2/26/2025 9:32:54 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 2025 MILL & OVERLAY AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL ANO SGL MJB 132214DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ANDREW N. OLSON 59327 02/26/2025 C2.01 EROSION CONTROL PLANFEETSCALE 0 200 400 HORZ.REROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1.ALL CATCH BASIN, INLETS AND FLARED ENDS (BOTH EXISTING AND PROPOSED) SHALL HAVE INLET PROTECTION INSTALLED PRIOR TO DISTURBANCE AND REMOVED AFTER RESTORATION IS ESTABLISHED. 2.APPLY HYDROMULCH FOR ANY TEMPORARY RESTORATION AS NEEDED. 3.QUANTITY FOR INLET PROTECTION IS BASED ON INLET PROTECTION NEEDED FOR EACH STRUCTURE DURING THE COURSE OF THE PROJECT. 4.THE BMPS SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ANTICIPATED SITE CONDITIONS. AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ANTICIPATE THAT ADDITIONAL BMPS MAY BE REQUIRED AS SITE CONDITIONS CHANGE AND SHALL PROVIDE THOSE BMPS TO MEET ANY APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS. 5.ALL EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES INSTALLED SHALL BE MAINTAINED, REPAIRED AND/OR CLEANED BY THE CONTRACTOR THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT. 6.ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED WITH TOPSOIL BORROW, SEED, FERTILIZER AND HYDRAULIC MATRIX TYPE MULCH.SEE SHEETC2.02SEE SHEETC2.02ALTERNATE PROJECT BOUNDARY S S S S S S SS S S S S S S S SS S S SS S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SS S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SSS S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SS S S S S S S S S SS S S S > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>S SS S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SSSS S S S S > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>D D D D D D D D DD D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>lllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllll lllll l l l lllllll lllllllll llllll llllllllllllllllllllll ll llll l lllllll l l l l l l lll lllllllllllllM M M M M M D D D D DD D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D DD D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D DD D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D 70th Street SMeadow G r a s s A v enu e H a d l e y C i r c l e Mead o w Gr ass Lane Timber Ridge Lane CourtTimber R idge Lane H a d l e y C o u r tHadley AvenueTimber Ridge DriveTimber Trail Lane Timber Ridge HollowTimber Crest DriveTimber Ridge CourtCOUNTY ROAD 74 C S A H 22 65th Street S 65th Street S Hardwood Avenue STi m b e r C r e s t D r i v e Pin e C r e s t T r a i l 70th Street S Timber Trail Lane Timber Trail Lane Hadley Avenue6909 6931 6953 6975 6997 7244 72507244 6982 7222 731073127314731673187320732273137315731773197341 7365 7367 7369 7391 7401 7407 7411 7415 7419 743174337435743774397441 7443 7445 7447 7449 699969956991698769836814-6830 6990-6998 6897 6859- 6857-6610-66246600-742873887372-68006784-6764-6780 7374-739073587342-67786762-6742-6785 6759 6743- 6737-6753 6729 6711- 6707- 6725 6699 6689-66426849 6847 6835- 68286786-7325732773297331733373356829- 6841 6819 6803- 7420- 6758 67566740- 66646656- 7340-735666526644- 6799-6817 6789 6771- 6767- 6720 6731 6763 6730 6680 6678 6674 6677 6681 6685 6689 6691 669366956699 6519 6515 6511 6509 6507 6503 6501 6851 6960 6948 6926 7203 7199 7177 7155 7133 7111 7109709770757053 6809 6893 6915 6917 6939 6951 6973 6995 6980 6968 6946 6924 6902 6880 6868 6846 6824 70317019 7200 7168 7146 7124 715071287114711271007088706670447022 9999 7192 6752 67406702 6690 6648 6626 6604 6592 6560 6552 6544 6530 6528 6522 6508 6500 6699 6677 6635 6603 6571 6798 6786 6744 69976985 6788 6990 6525 6521 70006772-6794 Pine Crest TrailEROSION CONTROL LEGEND INLET PROTECTION 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com R SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214C201.dwg 2/26/2025 9:32:58 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 2025 MILL & OVERLAY AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL ANO SGL MJB 132214DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ANDREW N. OLSON 59327 02/26/2025 C2.02 EROSION CONTROL PLANFEETSCALE 0 200 400 HORZ. R EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1.ALL CATCH BASIN, INLETS AND FLARED ENDS (BOTH EXISTING AND PROPOSED) SHALL HAVE INLET PROTECTION INSTALLED PRIOR TO DISTURBANCE AND REMOVED AFTER RESTORATION IS ESTABLISHED. 2.APPLY HYDROMULCH FOR ANY TEMPORARY RESTORATION AS NEEDED. 3.QUANTITY FOR INLET PROTECTION IS BASED ON INLET PROTECTION NEEDED FOR EACH STRUCTURE DURING THE COURSE OF THE PROJECT. 4.THE BMPS SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ANTICIPATED SITE CONDITIONS. AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ANTICIPATE THAT ADDITIONAL BMPS MAY BE REQUIRED AS SITE CONDITIONS CHANGE AND SHALL PROVIDE THOSE BMPS TO MEET ANY APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS. 5.ALL EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES INSTALLED SHALL BE MAINTAINED, REPAIRED AND/OR CLEANED BY THE CONTRACTOR THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT. 6.ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED WITH TOPSOIL BORROW, SEED, FERTILIZER AND HYDRAULIC MATRIX TYPE MULCH. ALTERNATE 1 PROJECT BOUNDARY SPPSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSLSSDDDDDDDDDDDSDSDDCHCHHCHHF7750 7200 7990 7375 7350 7855 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+004+005+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+0011+0012+0013+00MATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT MATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT Harkness Avenue South Hardwood Court80th Street SHardwood Avenue REMOVE AND REPLACE PEDESTRIAN RAMP PER MNDOT STANDARD PLAN 5-297.520 (TYP.) SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C6.07 REMOVE AND REPLACE PEDESTRIAN RAMP PER MNDOT STANDARD PLAN 5-297.520 (TYP.) SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C6.07 REMOVE CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN RAMP CONSTRUCT 6" CONCRETE SIDEWALK SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C6.07 V-3V-1 V - 4 V - 2 REMOVE AND REPLACE PEDESTRIAN RAMP PER MNDOT STANDARD PLAN 5-297.520 (TYP.) SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C6.06 REMOVE AND REPLACE PEDESTRIAN RAMP PER MNDOT STANDARD PLAN 5-297.520 (TYP.) SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C6.06 CONSTRUCT 10' BITUMINOUS TRAIL PER INSET C/C1.01 SUPPLEMENT GRAVEL AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER SEE DETAIL ON C6.07 REMOVE SIGN AND POST - 2 EA (PEDESTRIAN CROSSING) REMOVE SIGN AND POST - 2 EA (PEDESTRIAN CROSSING) 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com R SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214C602.dwg 2/26/2025 9:33:13 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 2025 MILL & OVERLAY AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL ANO SGL MJB 132214DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ANDREW N. OLSON 59327 02/26/2025 RC6.01 STREET IMPROVEMENTSFEETSCALE 0 50 100 HORZ. SEE SHEET C6.02 LEGEND BASE PROJECT SEE SHEET C1.01 FOR NOTES AND TYPICAL SECTION BITUMINOUS TRAIL RESURFACING SSSSSSSSDDDDDDDSSSSSSSSDDDDDDSS7560 7689 7675 7750 7781 11+0012+0013+0014+0015+0016+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00 26+00 27+00 28+00 29+00 MATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT MATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT East Point Douglas Road S Hardwood Avenue CONSTRUCT 10' BITUMINOUS TRAIL PER INSET C/C1.01 SUPPLEMENT GRAVEL AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER CONSTRUCT 10' BITUMINOUS TRAIL PER INSET C/C1.01 SUPPLEMENT GRAVEL AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER REMOVE AND REPLACE PEDESTRIAN RAMP PER MNDOT STANDARD DETAILS 5-297.520 (TYP.) SEE DETAIL ON C6.07 REMOVE AND REPLACE PEDESTRIAN RAMP PER MNDOT STANDARD DETAILS 5-297.520 (TYP.) SEE DETAIL ON C6.07 PROTECT EXISTING PEDESTRIAN RAMPS AND DRIVEWAY PROTECT TRAIL (TYP.) PROTECT TRAIL (TYP.) REMOVE SIGN AND POST - 2 EA (PEDESTRIAN CROSSING) REMOVE AND REPLACE BITUMINOUS TRAIL AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com R SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214C602.dwg 2/26/2025 9:33:20 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 2025 MILL & OVERLAY AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL ANO SGL MJB 132214DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ANDREW N. OLSON 59327 02/26/2025 RC6.02 STREET IMPROVEMENTSFEETSCALE 0 50 100 HORZ. SEE SHEET C6.01 SEE SHEETC6.03LEGEND TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES SEE SHEET C1.01 FOR NOTES AND TYPICAL SECTION. BITUMINOUS TRAIL RESURFACING SSSSSSSSSSSSDDDDDDDDDDD29+00 30+00 31+00 32+00 33+00 34+00 35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00 39+00 40+00 41+00 42+00 43+ 0 0 44+ 0 0 MATCH EX I S T I N G BITUMIN O U S P A V E M E N T MATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT Hardwood Avenue CONSTRUCT 10' BITUMINOUS TRAIL PER INSET C/C1.01 SUPPLEMENT GRAVEL AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSMMDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD7304 7308 7308 7304 7300 7296 7256 7185 7170 7190 7201722372457267729173017305 7307 7311 43 + 0 0 44 + 0 0 45+ 0 0 46+00 47+00 48+00 49+00 50+00 51+00 52+00 53+00 54+00 55+00 56+00 57+00 58+00 58+77.33 MATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT MATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT MATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT MATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT Harkness Avenue South 73rd StreetSouthS Red Pine RoadHardwood Avenue 70th StreetCONSTRUCT 8' BITUMINOUS TRAIL PER INSET C/C1.01 SUPPLEMENT GRAVEL AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER CONSTRUCT 10' BITUMINOUS TRAIL PER INSET C/C1.01 SUPPLEMENT GRAVEL AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER CONSTRUCT 10' BITUMINOUS TRAIL PER INSET C/C1.02 SUPPLEMENT GRAVEL AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER REMOVE AND REPLACE PEDESTRIAN RAMP PER MNDOT STANDARD DETAILS 5-297.520 (TYP.) SEE DETAIL ON C6.08 REMOVE AND REPLACE PEDESTRIAN RAMP PER MNDOT STANDARD DETAILS 5-297.520 (TYP.) SEE DETAIL ON C6.08 PROTECT EXISTING PEDESTRIAN RAMP MATCH AND PROTECT EXISTING RAMPS CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com R SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214C602.dwg 2/26/2025 9:33:28 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 2025 MILL & OVERLAY AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL ANO SGL MJB 132214DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ANDREW N. OLSON 59327 02/26/2025 RC6.03 STREET IMPROVEMENTSFEETSCALE 0 50 100 HORZ.SEE SHEETC6.02SEE SHEETC6.04LEGEND TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES SEE SHEET C1.01 FOR NOTES AND TYPICAL SECTION.RSEE ABOVESEE BELOWBITUMINOUS TRAIL RESURFACING S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SS S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SS S S S S S S S M D D D D DD D D D D D D D D D D D D D D DD D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D 38.66' 6909 6931 6953 6975 6997 7244 72507244 6982 7222 7310 7312 7314 7316 7313731573177319 6720 6731 6763 6730 6680 6678 6677 6681 6685 6689 6691 6693 66956699 6851 6960 6948 6926 7203 7199 7177 7155 7133 7111 7109709770757053 6809 6893 6915 6917 6939 6951 6973 69956980 6968 6946 6924 6902 6880 6868 6846 6824 70317019 7200 7168 7146 7124 7150712871147112 71007088706670447022 9999 7192 6752 6740 6702 6690 6648 6626 6604 6699 6677 6635 6603 6639 6627 6615 6603 6798 6786 6744 6758676067626764676667686770 6997 6985 6788 6990 685568576859686168636865686768696871687368756877 6525 7000 6690 6772 6774 6776 6778 6780 6782 675267546756 58+77.33Meadow Grass LaneTimber Ridge Lane CourtTimber Ridge LaneTimber Ridge DriveTimber Trail Lane Timber Ridge HollowTimber Cr e s t D r i v e C S A H Hardwood Avenue S70th Street S Timber Trail Lane Timber Trail LaneHadley AvenueADJUST SANITARY MANHOLE WITH NEW HDPE ADJUSTMENT RINGS ADJUST STORM MANHOLE WITH NEW HDPE ADJUSTMENT RINGS ADJUST STORM MANHOLE WITH NEW HDPE ADJUSTMENT RINGS ADJUST STORM MANHOLE WITH NEW HDPE ADJUSTMENT RINGS ADJUST STORM MANHOLE WITH NEW HDPE ADJUSTMENT RINGS ADJUST STORM MANHOLE WITH NEW HDPE ADJUSTMENT RINGS ADJUST STORM MANHOLE WITH NEW HDPE ADJUSTMENT RINGSTimber Ridge Court70th Street REMOVE AND REPLACE PEDESTRIAN RAMP PER MNDOT STANDARD PLAN 5-297.520 (TYP.) NEW HDPE ADJUSTMENT RINGS REMOVE AND REPLACE PEDESTRIAN RAMP PER MNDOT STANDARD PLAN 5-297.520 (TYP.) REMOVE AND REPLACE PEDESTRIAN RAMP PER MNDOT STANDARD PLAN 5-297.520 (TYP.) REMOVE AND REPLACE PEDESTRIAN RAMP PER MNDOT STANDARD PLAN 5-297.520 (TYP.) REMOVE AND REPLACE PEDESTRIAN RAMP PER MNDOT STANDARD PLAN 5-297.520 (TYP.) REMOVE AND REPLACE PEDESTRIAN RAMP PER MNDOT STANDARD PLAN 5-297.520 (TYP.) REMOVE AND REPLACE PEDESTRIAN RAMP PER MNDOT STANDARD PLAN 5-297.520 (TYP.) REMOVE AND REPLACE PEDESTRIAN RAMP PER MNDOT STANDARD PLAN 5-297.520 (TYP.) S S S S S S S S S S S S S S M D D D D D D D D D 6678 6674 6519 6515 6511 6507 6503 6501 6592 6560 6552 6544 6530 6528 6522 6508 6500 6571 6525 6521Hadley CircleHadley AvenueH a d l e y C o u r tHadley AvenueCOUNTY ROAD 74 65th Street S ADJUST STORM MANHOLE WITH NEW HDPE ADJUSTMENT RINGS ADJUST STORM MANHOLE WITH NEW HDPE ADJUSTMENT RINGS ADJUST STORM MANHOLE WITH NEW HDPE ADJUSTMENT RINGS REMOVE AND REPLACE PEDESTRIAN RAMP PER MNDOT STANDARD PLAN 5-297.520 (TYP.) 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com R SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214C604.dwg 2/26/2025 9:33:41 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 2025 MILL & OVERLAY AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL ANO SGL MJB 132214DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ANDREW N. OLSON 59327 02/26/2025 R C6.04 STREET IMPROVEMENTFEETSCALE 0 100 200 HORZ. LEGEND BASE PROJECT SEE SHEET C1.02 FOR NOTES AND TYPICAL SECTION. SEE LEFT SEE RIGHT SEE SHEETC6.05SEE SHEET C6.03 S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S D M D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D 38.66' 6909 6931 6953 6975 6997 7244 72507244 7310 7312 7314 7316 7318 7320 7322 7313731573177319 7341 7365 7367 7369 7391 7401 7407 7411 7415 7419 7431 7433 7435 7437 7439 7441 7443 7445 7447 7449 6999 6995 6991 6987 6983 6814 68186822 6826 6830 69906992699469966998 68876889689168936895 6897 68796875687168676863 6859 685768616865 6869 6636 6634 6632 6610 6614 6618 6622 6626 6628 6624 6620 6616 6612 6606 6604 6602 6600 7422742474267428 7388738473807376 7372 6800679667926788 6784 676467686772 67766780 7374 73787382 73867390 73587354 73507346 7342 67786774 677067666762 674267466750 6773677767816785 6759 67576755675167476743 673767396741674567496753 672967276723671967156711 670767096713671767216725 669966976695669366916689 6642 6640 6638 68736877 684968476845684368396835 6828 6824682068166812 6810 678667906794679868026804 7325 7327 7329 7331 7333 7335 68296831683368376841 681968156811680768037420 67546758 67566752 674867446740 66646662666066586656 7340 73447348 73527356 66526650 664866466644 67996801680568096813 6817 678967876783677967756771 67676769 9999 58+77.33 Pine Crest Trail Timber Trail Lane Hardwood Avenue STi m b e r C r e s t D r i v e Pine Cr e s t T r a i l Tim b e r C r e s t D r i v e ADJUST STORM MANHOLE (2) WITH NEW HDPE ADJUSTMENT RINGS ADJUST STORM MANHOLE WITH NEW HDPE ADJUSTMENT RINGS 70th Street 70th Street Timber Trail Lane REMOVE AND REPLACE PEDESTRIAN RAMP PER MNDOT STANDARD PLAN 5-297.520 (TYP.) REMOVE AND REPLACE PEDESTRIAN RAMP PER MNDOT STANDARD PLAN 5-297.520 (TYP.) REMOVE AND REPLACE PEDESTRIAN RAMP PER MNDOT STANDARD PLAN 5-297.520 (TYP.) REMOVE AND REPLACE PEDESTRIAN RAMP PER MNDOT STANDARD PLAN 5-297.520 (TYP.) 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com R SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214C604.dwg 2/26/2025 9:33:48 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 2025 MILL & OVERLAY AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL ANO SGL MJB 132214DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ANDREW N. OLSON 59327 02/26/2025 C6.05 STREET IMPROVEMENTSFEETSCALE 0 100 200 HORZ.SEE SHEETC6.04LEGEND ALTERNATE 1 - PINE ARBOR SEE SHEET C1.02 FOR NOTES AND TYPICAL SECTION. R SEE SHEET C6.03SEE SHEETC6.04 F T F F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F- D F- D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F- D F- D F- D F- DF-DF-DC-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C- D C- D C-D C-D C-D C- D C- D C- D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E- D E- D E- DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E- D E- D E- DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G- D G- D G- DG-DG-DG-DH CHH FS PC PTVPI: 600+06.15 822.48 VPI: 600+12.29 822.58 VPI: 600+25.36 823.17 VPI: 600+44.08 823.45 VPI: 600+60.25 823.76 8 2 4 . 0 0 823.82823.52823.56823.558 2 3 . 4 3 8 2 3 . 3 0 8 2 3 . 1 5 823.38823.068 2 2 . 9 5 8 2 2 . 7 2822.918 2 3 . 3 0 8 2 3 . 6 7 823.980" 0" 3" 4"Hardwood AvenueHa r d w o o d C o u r t 1.7 3 % 1.50% 1. 4 5 %3.04%1.50%2.91%3.63%4.66%4.99%2.21%4.74%1.94% 1 .5 0 %4.50%1.65%823.461.50% 5.96%0.48%GOOD WIL L T F FF-DF-DF-DF-DF-DF-DF- D F- D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC- D C-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DHC8 2 1 . 8 8 821.948 2 2 . 1 0 8 2 2 . 0 4 821.918 2 1 . 7 4821.98822.158 2 2 . 2 5 8 2 2 . 2 1 8 2 2 . 1 7 8 2 2 . 4 0 8 2 2 . 3 4822.38PCPT VPI: 603+11.39 821.73 VPI: 603+15.01 821.76 VPI: 603+39.26 821.93 VPI: 603+42.56 821.95 0" 0" 3" 3" 6"Hardwood AvenueCONSTRUCT CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP PER STANDARD DETAILS ON SHEETS C1.03 - C1.08 (TYP.) 1.50% 1.50% 0.86%1.00%0.8 2% 2.59%1.00%2.13%1. 5 4 % 0 . 9 8 %1.00%8.00%1.03%0.69%1.16%0 .6 9 %0.69% US BA N K FS T F-DF-DF-DF-DF-DF-DF-DF-DF-DF-DF-DF-DF-DF-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC8 2 2 . 0 8 8 2 2 . 0 4 8 2 1 . 9 1 822.158 2 2 . 1 7 8 2 2 . 2 4 822.108 2 2 . 2 8822.46822.808 2 2 . 7 3 8 2 2 . 8 7 PC PTPRC VPI: 602+06.96 822.05 VPI: 602+12.23 822.06 VPI: 602+13.75 822.06 VPI: 602+33.27 821.87 VPI: 602+47.37 821.59 0" 3" 0" 6"Hardwood Avenue1.00%1.00% 1.50%1.88%1.90%7.34%2.49%3.14%0.97%2 .0 0 %0.29%0.45% CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE RELOCATION OF PRIVATE UTILITY 8 2 2 . 1 9 8 2 2 . 2 1 1.40%PATCH BITUMINOUS STREET (TYP) ADJUST CATCH BASIN CASTING KOHL' S F S TC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D 823 . 0 7 823 . 1 0 822 . 6 4 822 . 6 2 822 . 8 2 822 . 7 0 823 . 3 1 823 . 4 6 823 . 0 6 823 . 2 0 823 . 4 0 823 . 1 4 823 . 1 6 823 . 2 6 823 . 3 2 823 . 1 9 823 . 4 2 823 . 3 4 823 . 4 4 823 . 2 0 823 . 5 3 823 . 7 4 823 . 2 2 PCPT VPI: 601+08.55 823.24VPI: 601+17.06 823.28 VPI: 601+22.44 823.22 VPI: 601+32.99 823.08 VPI: 601+49.14 822.72 VPI: 601+57.40 822.64 VPI: 601+59.04 822.61 VPI: 601+64.34 822.52 0" 6" 6" 6" 0"3"Hardwood AvenueHardwood Court 8.00% 8.00%1.00%1.06%2.09% 2.66% 1.06%0.74%0. 2 4 % 1.49% 1.68%1.27%1.34% 3.93%0.96%2.00%2.40%1.00%8.12% 0.41% 2.22% 1.29%1.00%1.76%1.09% 0" MUDD Y C O W 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com R SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214C606.dwg 2/26/2025 9:34:09 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 2025 MILL & OVERLAY AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL ANO SGL MJB 132214DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ANDREW N. OLSON 59327 02/26/2025 C6.06 INTERSECTION DETAILSFEETSCALE 0 5 10 HORZ. RR RRFAN RAMP FAN RAMP FAN RAMP COMBINED DIRECTIONAL RAMP X" TRUNCATED DOMES (SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 7038) CURB HEIGHT LANDING AREA - 4' X 4' MIN. DIMENSIONS AND 1.0% OPTIMUM (2.0% MAXIMUM) SLOPE IN ALL DIRECTIONS PEDESTRIAN RAMP SLOPE SHALL BE 7.0% OPTIMUM (5.0% MIN. AND 8.3% MAX.) IN THE DIRECTION SHOWN AND CROSS SLOPE SHALL BE 1.5% OPTIMUM (2.0% MAX.) PEDESTRIAN RAMP SLOPE SHALL BE 4.0% OPTIMUM (2.0% MIN. AND 5.0% MAX.) IN THE DIRECTION SHOWN AND CROSS SLOPE SHALL BE 1.5% OPTIMUM (2.0% MAX.) TRANSITION PANEL(S) - TO BE USED FOR TRANSITIONING THE CROSS-SLOPE OF A RAMP TO THE EXISTING WALK CROSS-SLOPE. RATE OF TRANSITION SHOULD BE 0.5% PER 1 LINEAR FOOT OF WALK. F S T PEDESTRIAN RAMP LEGEND INTERSECTION DETAIL NOTES: 1.ALL NEW INTERSECTION CURB RADII ARE 20' AS MEASURED FROM THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 2.CONSTRUCT CURB AND GUTTER AT PEDESTRIAN RAMPS TO HAVE A GUTTER SLOPE OF NO MORE THAN 2.0%. SSSD D 14+00 15+00 821.19 821.08 821.22821.31 821.67 821.68 821.80 821.86 821.78 Hardwood Avenue East Point DouglasRoad SS D D 10+00 840.83 840.68840.90840.96 841.11 841.05 840.84 841.05 840.90840.69Harkness AvenueSouthHa r d w o o d A v e n u e S S D 9+ 0 0 10+00 Hardwo o d A v e n u e Hardwood Aven u e 840.51 840.40 840.39 840.28 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com R SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214C607.dwg 2/26/2025 9:34:22 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 2025 MILL & OVERLAY AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL ANO SGL MJB 132214DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ANDREW N. OLSON 59327 02/26/2025 C6.07 INTERSECTION DETAILSFEETSCALE 0 5 10 HORZ. R R R S SS52+00822.10822.04822.60 822.72 822.54 821.87821.82S Red Pine Road Hardwood Avenue73rd StreetS SSMDD44+00 45+00 46+00 824.00824.15824.00823.77 823.92 823.67 823.96 823.88 823.64823.82823.96824.04 Hardwood Avenue Harkness Avenue S3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com R SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214C607.dwg 2/26/2025 9:34:30 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 2025 MILL & OVERLAY AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL ANO SGL MJB 132214DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ANDREW N. OLSON 59327 02/26/2025 C6.08 INTERSECTION DETAILSFEETSCALE 0 5 10 HORZ. R R SPPSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDSDSDDHHFSS7201 7750 7781 7200 7990 7375 7350 7855 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+0 0 11+0012+0013+0014+0015+00 16+00 17+00 18+0 0 SEE SHEET C7.04 4SW G 4BW G East P o i n t D o u g l a s Road S o u t h Ha r k n e s s A v e n u e S o u t h Hardwood Court80th Street SHard w o o d A v e n u e 4BW G 4DY G 4SW G 4BW G 4DY G 4BW G 4SW G 4DY G 4SW G 4DY G 4DW G "ONLY" PAVEMENT MESSAGE 12SW G 24SY G 12SW G 24SY G 4BW G 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com R SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214C701.dwg 2/26/2025 9:34:39 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 2025 MILL & OVERLAY AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL ANO SGL MJB 132214DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ANDREW N. OLSON 59327 02/26/2025 RC7.01 SIGNING AND STRIPING PLANFEETSCALE 0 50 100 HORZ. CROSSWALK BLOCK WHITE CIRCLE - MULTI COMP EXAMPLE: = 4" SOLID LINE WHITE - MULTI COMP SQUARE - PREF THERMO STRIPING KEY PAVEMENT MESSAGE (TYP) TRIANGLE - PAINT PENTAGON - PREF TAPE SYMBOLS & MATERIALS LEGEND 1ST DIGIT WIDTH 4", 8", ETC. 2ND DIGIT PATTERN S - SOLID B - BROKEN D - DOTTED/DOUBLE 3RD DIGIT COLOR W - WHITE Y - YELLOW B - BLACK 4SW G - GROUND IN SSSSSSSSSDDDDDD18+00 19+00 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00 26+00 27+00 28+00 29+00 30+00 31+00 32+00 33+00 4DY G PROTECT EXISTING STRIPING 4DY G PROTECT EXISTING STRIPING 24SY G SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSMDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD7304 7311 32+00 33+00 34+00 35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00 39+00 40+00 41+00 42+00 43+ 0 0 44+0 0 45+00 46+00 47+00 Hardwood Avenue Harkness A v e n u e S o u t h 4DY G 12SW G 24SW G 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com R SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214C701.dwg 2/26/2025 9:34:44 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 2025 MILL & OVERLAY AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL ANO SGL MJB 132214DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ANDREW N. OLSON 59327 02/26/2025 RCROSSWALK BLOCK WHITE CIRCLE - MULTI COMP EXAMPLE: = 4" SOLID LINE WHITE - MULTI COMP SQUARE - PREF THERMO STRIPING KEY PAVEMENT MESSAGE (TYP) TRIANGLE - PAINT PENTAGON - PREF TAPE SYMBOLS & MATERIALS LEGEND 1ST DIGIT WIDTH 4", 8", ETC. 2ND DIGIT PATTERN S - SOLID B - BROKEN D - DOTTED/DOUBLE 3RD DIGIT COLOR W - WHITE Y - YELLOW B - BLACK 4SW G - GROUND IN C7.02 SIGNING AND STRIPING PLANFEETSCALE 0 50 100 HORZ.R SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSMMDDDDDDDDDDDDDD6997 7190 7201722372457267729173017305 7307 7311 46+0 0 47+00 48+00 49+00 50+00 51+00 52+00 53+00 54+00 55+00 56+00 57+00 58+00 58+77.33 Hardwood Avenue S 73rd Street SouthS Red Pine Road12SW G 4SW G 4DY G 4SW G 4DY G 4SW G Hardwood Avenue S SSSSSSSSSDDDDDDDDDDD6909 6931 6953 6975 6997 7244 7313 7315 7317 7319 9999 58+00 58+77.33 Timber Trail LaneTimber Crest DriveHardwood Avenue S 4SW G 12SW G 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com R SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214C701.dwg 2/26/2025 9:34:49 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 2025 MILL & OVERLAY AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL ANO SGL MJB 132214DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ANDREW N. OLSON 59327 02/26/2025 CROSSWALK BLOCK WHITE CIRCLE - MULTI COMP EXAMPLE: = 4" SOLID LINE WHITE - MULTI COMP SQUARE - PREF THERMO STRIPING KEY PAVEMENT MESSAGE (TYP) TRIANGLE - PAINT PENTAGON - PREF TAPE SYMBOLS & MATERIALS LEGEND 1ST DIGIT WIDTH 4", 8", ETC. 2ND DIGIT PATTERN S - SOLID B - BROKEN D - DOTTED/DOUBLE 3RD DIGIT COLOR W - WHITE Y - YELLOW B - BLACK 4SW G - GROUND IN C7.03 SIGNING AND STRIPING PLANFEETSCALE 0 50 100 HORZ.R S P P S S S S DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-D C - D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-DF-DF-DF-DF-DF-DF-DF-DF-DF-DF-DF-DF-DF-DF-D F -D F -D F - D F - D F- D F- D F- D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-DF-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F- D F- D F- D F- D F- D F- D F -D F -D F -D F -D F -DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-D C -D C -DC-D C -D C -D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C - D C - D C-D C- D C- D C- D C- D C - D C - D C - D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-DE-DE-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E- D E- D E- D E- D E- D E-DE -D E -D E -D E -D E -DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-DE-D E - D E- D E- D E- D E- D E- D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E- D E- D E- D E- D E- D E-DE- D E- D E- D E- D E -DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-D C - D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C -DC-D C -D C -D C -D C -DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-D G - D G- D G- D G- D G- D G- D G- D G-D G-DG-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G - D G - D G - D G - D G - D G - D G-DG-DG-DG-DG-D G-D D S D S D D C HC H H C H HF LEFTMUSTTURNLANELEFTR3-7L(30 X 30)RIGHTTURNMUSTRIGHTLANE(30 X 30)R3-7RRIGHTTURNMUSTRIGHTLANE(30 X 30)R3-7RW1-2aL(36X36)25SHIFT EXISTING "NO U-TURN" SIGN PANEL TO TOP OF POST PR8-3A(24 X 24)CORE DRILL FOR POSTDUE TO MEDIAN SLOPE 4SW G 4SW G 4BW G 4BW G 24SW G 12SW G 12SW G 12SW G 12SW G 24SW G 24SW G 24SW G Hardwood C o u r tHardwood AvenueHa rdwood A v enue 4DY G 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com R SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214C705.dwg 2/26/2025 9:34:57 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 2025 MILL & OVERLAY AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL ANO SGL MJB 132214DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ANDREW N. OLSON 59327 02/26/2025 C7.04 SIGNING AND STRIPING PLANFEETSCALE 0 20 40 HORZ. R NOTES: 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFORM TO ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (CURRENT EDITION), INCLUDING THE "FIELD MANUAL FOR TEMPORARY TRAFFIC ZONE LAYOUTS". 2.ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL HAVE RETROREFLECTIVE SHEETING. 3.PLACE W23-2 (36X36) "NEW TRAFFIC PATTERN AHEAD" SIGNS ON ALL FOUR LEGS AFTER SIGNAL IS ACTIVATED AND REMOVE AFTER ONE MONTH (INCIDENTAL TO TRAFFIC CONTROL BID ITEM). PAVEMENT MARKING NOTES: 1.ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS TO BE GROUND IN CROSSWALK BLOCK WHITE CIRCLE - MULTI COMP EXAMPLE: = 4" SOLID LINE WHITE - MULTI COMP SQUARE - PREF THERMO STRIPING KEY PAVEMENT MESSAGE (TYP) TRIANGLE - PAINT PENTAGON - PREF TAPE SYMBOLS & MATERIALS LEGEND 1ST DIGIT WIDTH 4", 8", ETC. 2ND DIGIT PATTERN S - SOLID B - BROKEN D - DOTTED/DOUBLE 3RD DIGIT COLOR W - WHITE Y - YELLOW B - BLACK 4SW G = GROUND IN S P P S S S S SS SSSS S S S S S S S S S S L SS D D D D D D D D C-DC-DC-DC-DC-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-DF-DF-DF-DF-DF-D F -D F - D F- D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F- D F-DF -D F -DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-D C - D C- D C- D C- D C - D C - D C-D C- D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-DE- D E -D E -DE-DE-DE-D E- D E- D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E- D E- D E- D E- D E -DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C -D C -DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-D G- D G- D G- D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G - D G - D G-DG-D D S D S D D C HC H H C H HF AREA UNDER CONSTRUCTION CLOSEDSIDEWALK (30 X 18) R9-9CLOSEDSIDEWALK(30 X 18)R9-9HarknessAvenueSouthHardwood C o u r t 80th Street S 80th Street S Hardwood AvenueHa rdwood A v enue S P P S S S SS SSSS S S S S S S S S S L S D D D D D D D C-DC-DC-DC-DC-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-DF-DF-DF-DF-DF-D F -D F -D F- D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F- D F- D F -D F -DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-D C -D C -D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C-D C- D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E- D E- D E -D E -DE-DE-DE-D E- D E- D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E- D E- D E - D E - D E -DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C -D C -DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-D G- D G- D G- D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G - D G - D G-DG-D D S D S D D C HC H H C H HF AREA UNDER CONSTRUCTION CLOSEDSIDEWALK (30 X 18) R9-9CLOSEDSIDEWALK(30 X 18)R9-9CLOSEDSIDEWALK(30 X 18)R9-9CLOSEDSIDEWALK(30 X 18)R9-9HarknessAvenueSouthHardwood C o u r t 80th Street S 80th Street S Hardwood AvenueHa rdwood A venu e 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com R SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214C705.dwg 2/26/2025 9:35:04 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 2025 MILL & OVERLAY AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL ANO SGL MJB 132214DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ANDREW N. OLSON 59327 02/26/2025 C7.05 STREET SIGNAGE & PAVEMENT MARKING PLANFEETSCALE 0 50 100 HORZ. R PHASE 1 NOTES: 1.CONSTRUCT CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER AND CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN RAMPS WITHIN AREA OF CONSTRUCTION AS SHOWN. 2.MINIMIZE STREET PAVEMENT REMOVALS TO ACCOMMODATE VEHICLES ACCESS TO/FROM THE PRIVATE DRIVE. 3.PAVE TEMPORARY BITUMINOUS OR CONCRETE STREET PATCH (INCIDENTAL) UNTIL PERMANENT STREET PATCH CAN BE CONSTRUCTED IN PHASE 2. PHASE 2 NOTES: 1.CONSTRUCT CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER AND CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN RAMPS WITHIN AREA OF CONSTRUCTION AS SHOWN. 2.MINIMIZE STREET PAVEMENT REMOVALS TO ACCOMMODATE VEHICLES ACCESS TO/FROM HARDWOOD COURT. 3.ONCE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER AND PEDESTRIAN RAMPS ARE CURED, REMOVE REMAINDER OF STREET PAVEMENT AND PERFORM PERMANENT STREET PATCH AT ALL CORNERS. REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY PATCHES CONSTRUCTED IN PHASE 1 SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE STREET PATCH. SIGNAL PLAN C7.06 LUMINAIRE NO. SIGNAL BASE NO. VIDEO DETECTION EQ.G CONNECTION ABBREVIATIONS SYMBOLS EVP CONFIRMATORY LIGHT EVP DETECTOR EVP DETECTOR AND CONFIRMATORY LIGHT BARREL MOUNT BASE NO. WOOD POLE NO. HANDHOLE V___ SIGNAL HEAD NO./FLASHER HEAD NO. FOR PLANS AND UTILITIES SYMBOLS SEE TECHNICAL MANUAL ADVANCE WARNING FLASHER COUNT DOWN DETECTOR (PHASE 2, NO. 1) DEGREES DON'T WALK FURNISH AND INSTALL FLASH/FLASHING FLASHING YELLOW ARROW FLASHING YELLOW LEFT ARROW GREEN LEFT ARROW GREEN INDICATION GROUND ROD GREEN RIGHT ARROW GREEN THRU ARROW HANDHOLE INDICATION INPLACE INSULATED GROUND JUNCTION BOX LIGHT EMITTING DIODE LUMINAIRE NEUTRAL PEDESTRIAN HEAD (PHASE 1, NO. 1) PUSH BUTTON PUSH BUTTON (PHASE 2, NO. 1) PEDESTRIAN RED INDICATION REMOVE AND SALVAGE RED LEFT TURN ARROW SALVAGE AND INSTALL SPARE STATION WALK INDICATION YELLOW INDICATION YELLOW LEFT ARROW YELLOW RIGHT ARROW AWF C.D. D2-1 (e.g.) DEG DWK F&I FL FYA FYLA GLA GRN GR. RD. GRA GTA HH IND INP INS. GR. JB LED LUM NEU P1-1 (e.g.) PB PB2-1 (e.g.) PED RED R&S RLA S&I SPR STA WLK YEL YLA YRA SPLICE FIBER OPTIC SPLICE VAULT TELEVISION CAMERA (CCTV) F0 2 3 3-2 BM 4 WP 1 PV PULL VAULT STATE PROJECT NO. DATENAME DESIGNER LICENSE. NO. DARRIN L. RICKBEIL INDEX 43354 03-05-2025BRYAN T. NEMETH I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT SHEETS C7.08 THROUGH C7.19 OF THIS PLAN WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. TITLE SHEET DETAILS SIGNAL SYSTEM PAD DETAIL SHEET SIGNAL SYSTEM LAYOUT SIGNAL SYSTEM WIRING DIAGRAM SIGNAL SYSTEM SIGN DETAILS C7.08 C7.09-C7.13 C7.14 C7.15-C7.17 C7.18 C7.19 INDEX MAP PROJECT LOCATION WASHINGTON COUNTY DISTRICT METRO H A R DW O O D A V E HARDWOOD CT TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM SIGNAL SYSTEM A HARDWOOD AVE AND HARDWOOD CT R 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214_C_SGNL_N1.dwg 2/26/2025 9:35:12 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA HARDWOOD AVENUE AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL DLR DLR BTN 132214DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BRYAN T. NEMETH 43354 03/05/2025 STANDARD DETAIL PLATES ST. PAUL PLATE NO. Mn/DOT PLATE NO.STANDARD DETAIL 7038A DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE TRUNCATED DOMES 8112I PEDESTAL FOUNDATION 8122A PEDESTAL AND PEDESTAL BASE 8129A SHIM AND WASHER 5121 TRANSFORMER POLE BASE 5122 POLE AND MAST ARM - LUMINAIRES & TRAFFIC LIGHTS ASSEMBLY (FOR ALL POLE TYPES) (2 SHEETS) 5123 POLE FOUNDATION (PA90 & PA100) LOCKING BOLTS 7/16" X 2" GRADE 5 JAM NUT 1/2" DIMPLE (2) BY POLE MFG"R. CLOSE NIPPLE O RING FLANGE 3/8" X 2" SS BOLT 1" OD X 3/4" ID BUSHING, USE 1" DRILL FOR HOLE SUPPORTING MEMBER PVC WIREWAY O-RING SEAL BUSHING 7/16" MOUNTING HOLE 7/16" MOUNTING HOLE TWO BLIND THREADED INSERTS (RIVET NUT) USE 17/32" DRILL BIT FOR HOLES *SEE NOTE NO.3 BELOW 4-3/4" DIA. BOLT CIRCLE 9-1/2"1"3-3/4"1"5-3/4"3-3/4"O-RING SEAL PVC WIREWAY 4-3/4" 1-1/2" NOM. 1-1/2" HEAVY SCHEDULE 80 STAINLESS STEEL PIPE NIPPLE (4) 15/32" THREADED HOLES 5-1/2" PVC TUBE POLE HUB BY POLE MFG'R. 5-3/4" 4-3/4" LOCKING BOLTS 1/2" 1/2" LOCK WASHER 1/2" NUT 1/2" DIMPLE (2) (BY POLE MFG'R.) 1-1/2" NOM. 1-1/2" HEAVY SCHEDULE 80 STAINLESS STEEL PIPE POLE HUB (BY POLE MFG'R.) POLE (BY POLE MFG'R.) (4) 1/2" THREADED HOLES(4) 7/16" X 1" SLOTTED HOLES (FOR SIGNAL MOUNT) FLANGE ALL THREADED SURFACES TO BE COATED WITH ANTI-SEIZE COMPOUND. NOTE: 3 1/2" PIPE BACKGROUND SHIELD YELLOW ARROW YEL RED GRN BI-MODAL GREEN ARROW AND YELLOW FLASHING ARROW 5 SECTION FYA CLUSTER HEAD DETAIL THREADED HUB AND FLANGE POLE ADAPTOR EXTENDED THREADED POLE ADAPTER BOLT ON HUB & FLANGE TOP VIEW MAST ARM 12'-8"9'-6"3'-2" ANGLE MOUNTPLUMBIZERANGLE & STRAIGHT MOUNT CAP NOT TO SCALE BOTTOM OF TRANSFORMER BASE TYPICAL SIGNAL POLE MOUNTING THREADED HUB & FLANGE POLE ADAPTOR NOTES: 1. ALL THREADED SURFACES TO BE COATED WITH ANTI-SEIZE COMPOUND. 2. USE SIGNAL HEAD MOUNTED SPACERS FOR 4 SECTION POLY HEADS. 3. SEE STANDARD PLATE NUMBER 8123 FOR ADDITIONAL SIGNAL POLE DETAILS. 4. EXTENDED THREADED POLE ADAPTOR ONLY USED WITH 5 SECTION CLUSTER HEADS.USE SPACERSWITH 4SECTION HEADS3'-6"ABOVE LANDINGACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN PUSHBUTTON UNIT W/SIGN PEDESTRIAN PUSHBUTTON APS PUSH BUTTON POLE MOUNT ADAPTOR 6"MINDRILL 1/2" HOLE FOR WIRE WHEN MOUNTING 5 SECTION CLUSTER HEAD ASSEMBLIES USE EXTENDED THREADED POLE ADAPTORS 1"1" PVC WIREWAY 1"7-1/2"2-3/4" O-RING SEAL SIDE VIEW DRILL 25/64" HOLES (2) FOR BLIND THREADED INSERT NOTES: 1. ALL THREADED SURFACES TO BE COATED WITH ANTI-SEIZE COMPOUND. 2. USE SIGNAL HEAD MOUNTED SPACERS FOR 4 SECTION POLY HEADS. 3. BLIND THREADED INSERTS (RIVET NUT) MUST BE INSERTED USING MANUFACTURERS SPECIFIC INSERTION TOOL. NO OTHER METHOD IS ACCEPTABLE. 4. SEE STANDARD PLATE NUMBER 8122 FOR ADDITIONAL PEDESTAL POLE DETAILS. BOTTOM OF BASE PEDESTRIAN PUSHBUTTON 3'-6"10'-0"3-2"NOT TO SCALE ANGLE/ STRAIGHT MOUNT CAP STRAIGHTMOUNTPLUMBIZERABOVE SIDEWALKDRILL 1/2" HOLE FOR WIRE TYPICAL PEDESTAL MOUNTINGUSE SPACERSWITH 4SECTION HEADSACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN PUSHBUTTON UNIT W/SIGN APS PUSHBUTTON MOUNTING SPACERS DRILL 25/64" HOLES (3) FOR BLIND THREADED INSERT & SPACERS14'-2"14'-0"15'-5"SIGNAL SYSTEM - DETAILS SIGNAL PLAN C7.07 R 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214_C_SGNL_N1.dwg 2/26/2025 9:35:19 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA HARDWOOD AVENUE AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL DLR DLR BTN 132214DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BRYAN T. NEMETH 43354 03/05/2025 7"+ 4.25"-ABOVE SIDEWALK LANDING AREA+-15"SILICONE BEAD ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON UNIT W/SIGN PUSH BUTTON SIDEWALK LANDING AREA 1'' RIGID PVC CONDUIT RIGID PVC CONDUIT SWEEP 1/2" ROUNDED RADIUS 1" RIGID PVC CONDUIT WITH END BELL (2"+/- 1/2" PROJECTION) NOMINAL 4" NATIONAL PIPE THREAD (NPT) AS REQUIRED AT THE END OF THE PIPE. 3" REFLECTIVE SHEETING DRILL 3/4" HOLE FOR WIRES DRILL 25/64" HOLES (2) FOR BLIND THREADED INSERT 3" REFLECTIVE SHEETING 6" BOLT CIRCLE BREAKAWAY BASE ANCHOR RODS < NOTES: APS PUSH BUTTON STATION 3' 6'' 6'' MIN.6' WALK C&G 6' WALK C&G C&GCROSSWALK CROSSWALK C&G6' WALK6' WALK 1 1 2 (SHOWN) PB2-1 6 1 CROSSWALK CROSSWALK(SHOWN) 7 2 4 CURB IF NEEDED TWIN PERPENDICULARS DEPRESSED CORNER PB4-2 A B C D 7 4 3 THIS DETAIL APPLIES TO ALL DESIGNS WHEN PUSH BUTTONS ARE AT THE TOP OF A RAMP THIS DETAIL APPLIES TO ALL DESIGNS WHEN PUSH BUTTONS ARE AT THE BOTTOM OF A RAMP 3 5 LANDING NON-WALKABLE SURFACE LANDING NON-WALKABLE SURFACE 9"9" 9" 12" 12" CONCRETE WALK CONCRETE WALK A - DISTANCE MEASURED FROM THE PUSH BUTTON TO THE FRONT OF LANDING/TOP OF RAMP B - CLEAR DISTANCE MEASURED FROM THE PUSH BUTTON TO THE BACK OF LANDING/EDGE OF WALK C - CLEAR DISTANCE MEASURED FROM THE PUSH BUTTON TO THE OUTSIDE EDGE OF DOMES IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL D - CLEAR DISTANCE FROM THE PUSH BUTTON TO THE BACK OF LANDING MEASURED IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL X Y DISTANCE TO FRONT OF LANDING (FT) SIGNAL CONTROL POINTS SIGNAL NO. PB2-1 PB4-2 - - - - A B C D DISTANCE TO BACK OF LANDING (FT) TYPICAL APS PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON LOCATION THIS IS A GENERAL DETAIL INTENDED TO SHOW THE REQUIREMENTS OF APS PUSH BUTTON LOCATION. FOR PROJECT SPECIFIC INFORMATION REGARDING PEDESTRIAN RAMP LAYOUT AND PUSH BUTTON LOCATIONS, SEE THE PLAN. SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE FOR CONSTRUCTING COMPLIANT APS PUSH BUTTONS: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 CONTRACTOR MUST USE OPTION 1 OR 2 WHEN THE APS PUSH BUTTON IS SHOWN AT THE EDGE OF WALK. OPTION USED (OR SELECTED) MUST BE THE SAME THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE PROJECT. ANCHOR ROD PLACEMENT OPTION 1 OPTION 2 THE FACE OF THE BUTTON SHALL BE PARALLEL WITH THE OUTSIDE EDGE OF CROSSWALK. A MINIMUM 4 FT X 4 FT LANDING AREA SHALL BE PROVIDED ADJACENT TO EACH BUTTON, WITH A 2 PERCENT MAXIMUM SLOPE IN ALL DIRECTIONS. BUTTONS SHALL BE WITHIN 5 FT OF THE OUTSIDE EDGE OF THE CROSSWALK. BUTTONS SHALL BE BETWEEN 1.5 FT AND 10 FT FROM THE BACK OF CURB OR EDGE OF ROADWAY, MEASURED IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. STANDALONE PUSH BUTTON STATIONS SHOULD BE 4' MINIMUM FROM THE BACK OF CURB TO AVOID KNOCKDOWNS. BUTTONS SHALL BE AT LEAST 10 FT APART. PROVIDE A MAINTENANCE ACCESS ROUTE (MAR) WHEREVER POSSIBLE FOR SNOW REMOVAL PURPOSES. A MAR REQUIRES A 6 FT MINIMUM CLEAR DISTANCE BETWEEN A PUSH BUTTON AND ANY OBSTRUCTIONS,INCLUDING BUILDINGS, V-CURB, ELECTRICAL FOUNDATIONS, SIGNAL CABINETS, OR ANOTHER PUSH BUTTON. BUTTON SHOULD BE 2 FT MINIMUM FROM RAMP GRADE BREAK AND BACK OF WALK. 12'' MIN. CONCRETE MIX 3F52 OR EQUAL 2 4'' TRADE SIZE DIAMETER ALUMINUM SHAFT (SCHEDULE 40 ALUMINUM - 48" LENGTH) SPUN FINISHED. ANODIC COATING AS PER MIL-A-8625C FOR TYPE II, CLASS I COATING. 5/8"(UNC) X 7 1/2" +/- 1/4" STAINLESS STEEL ROD IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT 3385.2D RODS AND CHAMFERED (ROUNDED) EDGE ON BOTH ENDS. DRILL 4 - 3/4" HOLES 6" DEEP INSERT FOUR ANCHOR RODS USING TWO PART EPOXY FOUND ON THE MNDOT APL FOR SIGNALS 18" DIAMETER ANODIZED ALUMINUM DOME CAP COMPACTED AGGREGATE BEDDING APS PUSH BUTTON BASE (SEE MNDOTS APPROVED/QUALIFIED PRODUCTS LIST) PLACEMENT AND ORIENTATION OF THE PUSH BUTTON STATION IS CRITICAL. MOUNT THE BUTTON SO THAT THE FACE IS PARALLEL WITH THE ASSOCIATED CROSSWALK. SCREW IN SHAFT TO A TIGHTENED POSITION BEFORE MOUNTING ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON UNIT TO THE SHAFT. ORIENT ACCESS OPENING ON THE BREAKAWAY PEDESTAL DIRECTLY BELOW THE APS BUTTON. PLUMB THE PUSH BUTTON STATION WITH LEVELING SHIMS IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARD PLATE 8129. INSTALL BLIND THREADED INSERTS USING MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFIC INSERTION TOOL. USE ZINC PLATED STEEL 1/4 - 20 UNC BLIND THREADED INSERTS SUITABLE FOR MOUNTING ON SURFACE WALL THICKNESS OF .337. APPROVED BLIND INSERTS ARE LISTED ON MNDOT'S APPROVED/QUALITY PRODUCTS LIST WEBSITE FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS. USE APS 1/4 - 20 STAINLESS STEEL MOUNTING BOLTS. APPLY BRUSH ON ANTI SEIZE COMPOUND TO BOLTS PRIOR TO ASSEMBLY. APPLY A BEAD OF 100% SILICONE SEALANT ALONG THE TOP OF THE PUSH BUTTON UNIT WHERE IT COMES IN CONTACT WITH THE 4" SHAFT. USE WHITE REFLECTIVE SHEETING AT INTERSECTION CORNERS AND YELLOW REFLECTIVE SHEETING IN CENTER MEDIANS. APPROVED TUBE DELINEATOR SHEETING IS LISTED ON MNDOT'S APPROVED/QUALIFIED PRODUCTS LIST WEBSITE FOR SIGNING. AN 18" X 6" FIBER FORMING TUBE MAY BE USED FOR THE LOWER HALF OF THE FOUNDATION WHEN CONDITIONS DO NOT ALLOW FOR THE 18" X 6" HOLE TO STAND OPEN. 1:2 (V:H) SLOPE GROUND LINE 3 3 THE PUSH BUTTON STATION FOUNDATION IS MONOLITHIC (POURED AT ONE TIME) WITH THE SIDEWALK. PROVIDE A 1:2 (V:H) SLOPE GRADE WHERE THE 6" MIN SIDEWALK DEPTH TRANSITIONS TO THE 12" MIN FOUNDATION DEPTH. MAINTAIN THE COMPACTED AGGREGATE BEDDING AND THICKNESS USED FOR THE SIDEWALK THROUGHOUT THE SLOPE AND FOUNDATION GRADING. PROVIDE 1:2 (V:H) SLOPE GRADING 360 DEGREES FOR THE TRANSITION FROM THE SIDEWALK TO THE FOUNDATION WHEN THE FOUNDATION IS NOT LOCATED NEAR EDGE OF SIDEWALK AND IS SURROUNDED BY CONCRETE WALK. ENSURE CONCRETE CONTROL JOINTS AND EDGE OF CONCRETE WALK ARE A MINIMUM 9" FROM THE CENTER OF THE PUSH BUTTON FOUNDATION. INSTALL THE MANUFACTURER PROVIDED CABLE TETHER ASSEMBLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. CABLE TETHER BOLT SIGNAL SYSTEM - DETAILS SIGNAL PLAN C7.08 R 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214_C_SGNL_N1.dwg 2/26/2025 9:35:22 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA HARDWOOD AVENUE AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL DLR DLR BTN 132214DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BRYAN T. NEMETH 43354 03/05/2025 $$TITLE LINE ONE$$$$TITLE LINE ONE$$DESIGNEDI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED TYPICAL MAST ARM CAMERA MOUNTING DETAILS MAST ARM CAMERA INSTALLATION APPROX. 26'+20' 3" 3"DETAIL "A" (MAST ARM) UPPER CHORD LOWER CHORD B B SECTION B-B (UPPER CHORD) 3/16 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6' CAMERA EXTENSION ASSEMBLY DETAIL "A" TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAST ARM 6' CAMERA EXTENSION ASSEMBLY HALF COUPLING (INSIDE THREADED) 1'' DIA. HALF COUPLING (INSIDE THREADED) F & I MAST ARMS WITH MANUFACTURER WELDED 1" HALF COUPLINGS AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. IF POSSIBLE RUN CONTINUOUS WITHOUT SPLICE VIDEO DETECTION CABLES BETWEEN THE SIGNAL CONTROL CABINET AND THE CAMERA. WHEN SPLICING IS NECESSARY F & I SPLICES APPROVED BY THE VIDEO DETECTION MANUFACTURER IN THE POLE TRANSFORMER BASES AND AT THE CAMERAS. RUN CABLES INSIDE THE POLES, MAST ARMS AND CAMERA MOUNTING EXTENSIONS. F & I CORD GRIPS INTO THE 1" HALF COUPLINGS WHERE THE CABLES ARE ROUTED THROUGH. F & I ALUMINUM TUBE CAMERA MOUNTING EXTENSIONS, ALUMINUM MOUNTING BRACKETS, AND STAINLESS STEEL STRAPS AND HARDWARE TO THE MAST ARM AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. REVERSE THE MOUNTING BRACKET WHEN IN CONFLICT WITH THE MAST ARM SIGNING DETAIL. BACK SIDE OF CORDAPPROACH SIDE OF CORD SIGNAL SYSTEM - DETAILS LUMINAIRE SHAFT EXTENSION SIGNAL PLAN C7.09 R 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214_C_SGNL_N1.dwg 2/26/2025 9:35:26 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA HARDWOOD AVENUE AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL DLR DLR BTN 132214DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BRYAN T. NEMETH 43354 03/05/2025 SIGNAL PLAN C7.10 R 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214_C_SGNL_N1.dwg 2/26/2025 9:35:32 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA HARDWOOD AVENUE AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL DLR DLR BTN 132214DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BRYAN T. NEMETH 43354 03/05/2025 SIGNAL SYSTEM - DETAILS 23" 19" 16"12"14"17"3 1/2"1 1/2"ALUMINUM BASE FRAMEWITH OPEN BOTTOM FOR ANCHOR RODSSLOTTED MTG. HOLEFOUR (4) 1" X 2 1/2" 17 1/4"2"1"SLIDING RACK BRACE17" X 2" ADJUSTABLE THREE (3) 2" DIA. HOLESWITH GROMMETS FOR WIRING 17" 15" 19" 10"13"32"34 1/2"4"21"5"39 1/4"56 3/4"27" 23"4"16"60"54 1/2"METER SOCKET (BY OTHERS) METER (BY OTHERS) HINGED BACK DOOR UNISTRUT RAILS LINE AND LOAD POWER 2PT TERMINAL BLOCK GROUND BUS 4P CONTACTOR NEUTRAL BUS 3PT TERMINAL BLOCK RACK STANDARD ALUMINUM BARRIER BETWEENLINE AND LOAD POWER LUMINAIRE TEST SWITCH HINGE (TYPICAL) DEAD FRONT LATCH HINGED DEAD FRONT DOOR LUMINAIRE TEST SWITCH SMALL - 4" W X 5 3/4" HLARGE - 5" W X 6 3/4" H HINGE (TYPICAL) HINGED FRONT DOOR ALUMINUM BASE FRAME BACK ELEVATION RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION TYPICAL SERVICE CABINET DETAILS SERVICE CABINET BASE DETAILS SERVICE CABINET SHELF DETAILS CAPPED AND VENTED ROOF TWO (2) CUTOUT PROVISIONS ALUMINUM BARRIER BETWEEN 13 1/4"CIRCUIT BREAKERSCUTOUT PROVISIONS FOR FOR BATTERY BACKUPBYPASS SWITCH POLICE LOCK WITHSWING DOWN PLATE 3PT LATCH WITHPADLOCKING PROVISIONS 4" LOUVERED VENTS WITH STEEL SCREEN BACKING CELLENCLOSED PHOTOELECTRIC CIRCUIT BREAKERSLOAD CENTER PHOTOELECTRIC CONTROLVIEWING WINDOW BATTERY BACKUPBYPASS SWITCH ADJUSTABLE REMOVABLESHELF 3" WIDE LOAD POWERWIRE WAY SHELF SHELF ADJUSTABLE REMOVABLE ADJUSTABLE REMOVABLE PHOTOELECTRIC CONTROLVIEWING WINDOW 3" WIDE LINE POWERWIRE WAY WITH COVER POLICE LOCK WITHSWING DOWN PLATE 3PT LATCH WITHPADLOCKING PROVISIONS 7. SHORT CIRCUIT RATING - 10,000 AIC SYMMETRICAL. 1. EACH SERVICE CABINET SHALL BE FABRICATED FROM 1/8" ALUMINUM FOR OUTDOOR 2. ALL HINGES, HINGE PINS AND LOCKS SHALL BE OF NON-CORRODING CONSTRUCTION. 6. THE CIRCUIT BREAKERS SHALL BE 120/240 VOLT AC, 60 HZ, AND SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED WITH THE "ON" AND "OFF" POSITIONS AND IDENTIFIED WITH THE LOAD WHICH IT IS CARRYING (E.G. "SIGNALS", "LUMINAIRE WITH NUMBER" OR "FUTURE"). ALL DETERIORATE WITH MOISTURE OR AGE. CIRCUIT BREAKERS SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED IN A MANNER THAT WILL NOT INTERFERENCE BY MANMADE LIGHT SOURCES AND SHALL NORMALLY FACE NORTH OR EAST. CABINET AND ON THE LEFT OR RIGHT SIDE OF THE CABINET, ORIENTED TO ELIMINATE PHOTOELECTRIC CONTROL VIEWING WINDOW. LOCATED IN THE TOP SECTION OF THE 5. PROVIDE A 2" DIA. WEATHERPROOF AND VANDAL RESISTANT CLEAR PLASTIC COMPLETE SEAL WITH THE ENCLOSURE. 4. BOTH DOOR OPENINGS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A NEOPRENE GASKET TO FORM A NON-CORRODING TAMPERPROOF CARRIAGE BOLTS AND SECURED WITH A STANDARD 3. THE SERVICE CABINET DOORS SHALL BE ATTACHED TO THE ENCLOSURE WITH WEATHERPROOF SERVICE. AFTER FABRICATION, THE SERVICE CABINET, BOTH INSIDE ANODIZED FINISH. 8. PROVIDE A PHOTOELECTRIC CONTROL CELL AND LUMINAIRE TEST SWITCH WITHIN THE CABINET. AND OUTSIDE, SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH AN EXTERNAL THIRTY (30) MINUTE CLEAR (DOOR REMOVED) PERFORATED STAINLESS POLICE LOCK COMPLETE WITH A NUMBER 2 KEY AND SWING DOWN PLATE. PROVIDE ONE (1) KEY.100A/2P C 60A/1P AUTO TEST C 12 34 PHOTOCELL CONTROL POWER TEST BY-PASS TOGGLE SWITCH GROUND ROD CONTACTOR 30A/4P 5 TERMINAL 200 AMP RINGLESS SOCKET WITH MECHANICAL BYPASS METER SOCKET MAIN SERVICE, 120/240V, SINGLE PHASE, 3 WIRE STREET LIGHTS METERED POWER SYSTEM AC OUT AC IN NEU GND BATTERY BACK-UP NEUTRAL BUSGROUND BUSTB2 (60 AMP) TO SIGNAL CABINET NEUTRAL BUS LUMINAIRE LUMINAIRE LUMINAIRE LUMINAIRE CONTROL L1 N L2 MAIN 15A/1P 15A/1P 15A/1P 15A/1P 15A/1P LUMINAIRE CIRCUIT BREAKER UPS 6PR #19 6PR #19 TO SIGNAL CONTROLLER CABINET SIGNAL SERVICE METERED POWER TO SIGNAL CONTROLLER CABINET 10. ALL CONDUIT ENTERING THE FOUNDATION SHALL BE SEALED WITH AN APPROVED DUCT SEAL. AS SERVICE ENTRANCE EQUIPMENT" AND APPROVED FOR OUTDOOR USE. 11. EACH SERVICE CABINET SHALL BE U.L. LISTED AND LABELED AS "SUITABLE FOR USE 12. EACH SERVICE CABINET SHALL BE WELDED TO THE BASE IN ACCORDANCE WITH U.L. STANDARDS. 13. SEE THE INTERSECTION LAYOUT FOR THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF LUMINAIRES AT EACH INTERSECTION. 14. A 1/2" THICK SOLID BUTYL RUBBER GASKET SHALL BE PROVIDED BETWEEN THE FOUR (4) STRIPS, SIZED TO FIT THE BASE INCLUDING CORNER HOLE/SLOTS TO ACCOMMODATE THE ANCHOR RODS. PROVIDE A 1/2" GAP FOR DRAINAGE. CONCRETE FOUNDATION AND THE SERVICE CABINET. THE GASKET SHALL CONSIST OF 15. UNISTRUT RAILS (#A400EA OR EQUIVALENT) USED FOR SHELF SUPPORTS FOR THREE (3) ADJUSTABLE AND REMOVABLE SHELVES SHALL BE MOUNTED TO THE SIDES OF THE SERVICE CABINET. 16. THE 19" RACK IN THE BASE OF THE CABINET SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO TIA/EIA 3100 STANDARDS. 9. PROVIDE CLEARANCE TO INSTALL OR REMOVE THE PHOTOELECTRIC CONTROL CELL. FRONT ELEVATIONFRONT ELEVATION FEED POINT WIRING DIAGRAM CONSTRUCTION NOTES 17. SEE THE EQUIPMENT PAD DETAIL SHEET FOR TYPICAL ANCHOR ROD DETAILS. SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED WITH BATTERIES AND 6PR#19 CABLE. 18. THE SERVICE PANEL SHALL BE BATTERY BACK-UP. IT SHALL BE SIGNAL PLAN C7.11 R 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214_C_SGNL_N1.dwg 2/26/2025 9:35:37 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA HARDWOOD AVENUE AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL DLR DLR BTN 132214DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BRYAN T. NEMETH 43354 03/05/2025 $$TITLE LINE ONE$$$$TITLE LINE ONE$$CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTADESIGNEDI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED 3" SIDE VIEW CONTROLLERCABINET CONCRETEPAD 3'3' 12" 30"PROJECT 2" - 3" ABOVE CONCRETE CONTROLLER CABINET 2" TO 3" WALK 4" MIN. CONCRETE NOTES: 7' GROUND ROD (5/8" DIA X 15') GROUND LINE OR PROPOSED EXISTING GROUND LINE OR PROPOSED EXISTING PLAN VIEW SEE SIGNAL PLAN LAYOUT FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NOT TO SCALE FOR ILLUSTRATION ONLY THE DIRECTION OF THE RSC STUBS. NO RSC STUB SHALL BE TERMINATED UNDER CONTROLLER CABINET SHALL BE PERMANENTLY MARKED WITH AN ARROW TO INDICATE ANY FORM OF PAVEMENT OR HARD SURFACE, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. DOOR OPEN AS SHOWN. AVOID CONFLICT WITH THE CONTROLLER CABINET OR THE CONTROLLER CABINET 7. THE CONCRETE PAD ELEVATION SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO MAINTAIN THE 12" BY THE ENGINEER. 6. THE CONCRETE PAD AND THE CONCRETE WALK SHALL BE CONCRETE MIX 3G52 OR 5. A CONCRETE SIDEWALK SHALL BE ON THE DOOR SIDE OF THE CONTROLLER CABINET, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. WITHIN THE CONCRETE PAD. FUNCTIONS (CONTROL EQUIPMENT, SUPPORTING MEMBERS, ETC.). ABOVE THE CONCRETE. THE CONDUITS SHALL NOT INTERFERE WITH THE CABINET THE DOOR SIDE OF THE CABINET. THE CONDUITS SHALL PROJECT 2" TO 3" 2. THE TOP OF THE CONDUITS SHALL BE THREADED AND CAPPED AFTER INSTALLATION (UNTIL CABLES ARE INSTALLED). 1. THE UPPER PART OF THE CONCRETE PAD SHALL BE BEVELED OR CHAMFERED IN A NEAT MANNER, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. (NO SCALE) CONTROLLER CABINET AND SERVICE CABINET 1. MATERIAL STEEL SHALL BE ASTM, A-36. 2. HOT DIP GALVANIZE FULL LENGTH. NUTS SHALL RUN FREE AFTER PLATING. 3. RODS TO BE SUPPLIED WITH GALVANIZED HEAVY HEX NUT AND FLAT WASHER, ASTM, A-563 ASSEMBLED AFTER ROD PLATING. 3/4" DIA. X 21" LONG BEFORE BENDING. NOTES: TYPICAL ANCHOR ROD (NO SCALE) CONTROLLER CABINET AND SERVICE CABINET TYPICAL ANCHOR ROD LOCATION FOR ANCHOR RODSSLOTTED MTG. HOLEFOUR (4) 1" X 2 1/2" 14" 3/4" DIA. BOLT 3" 18" 13 UNC-2A HEAVY HEX NUT AND FLAT WASHER16"11" 11" SERVICE CABINET CONCRETE PAD6"15"BATTERY BACK-UP SERVICE CABINET 3. THE LOCATION OF CONDUITS WITHIN THE CONCRETE PAD SHALL BE 6" TO THE CENTER OF THE CONDUIT FROM THE INSIDE LIP OF THE MOUNTING FLANGE ON FINAL CONDUIT LOCATIONS, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 4. CONDUITS WITH BOTH ENDS TERMINATING WITHIN THE PAD SHALL BE INSTALLED EQUAL, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. CLEARANCE ABOVE THE EXISTING OR PROPOSED GROUND LINE, AS DIRECTED 9. THREAD AND CAP BOTH ENDS OF ALL RSC STUBS. THE CAPS LOCATED WITHIN THE TYPICAL PAD WITH CONTROLLER CABINET AND SERVICE CABINET 8. THE SERVICE CABINET DOORS SHALL FACE AWAY FROM THE CONTROLLER CABINET TO NOT TO SCALE BACK VIEW FOR ANCHOR RODSSLOTTED MTG. HOLEFOUR (4) 1" X 2"41"18 1/2" 8 3/4" 8 3/4" CONTROLLER CABINET 6" INTERSECTION AND SEE IN THE CABINET. THE CONTROLLER CABINET SHALL NOT A PERSON WORKING IN THE CABINET HAS A CLEAR LINE OF SITE TO SEE THE BE ORIENTATED SUCH THAT A PERSON HAS THEIR BACK TO THE INTERSECTION WHEN 10. ORIENT THE CONTROLLER CABINET SUCH THAT WHEN THE CABINET DOOR IS OPENED WHEN WORKING IN THE CABINET. CONTROLLER CABINET 6" TYPICAL CONCRETE WALK PREFORMED JOINT FILLER CONTROLLER CABINET DOOR ANGLE IRON BASE FRAME GROUND ROD BATTERY BACK-UP SERVICE CABINET 8" MIN. 2" CONDUIT TO HH-5 2" CONDUIT 2-3" CONDUITS TO HH-1 BACK DOOR FRONT DOOR 2-3" CONDUITS TO HH-5 INSIDE LIP OF MOUNTING FLANGE 2" CONDUIT TO HH-1 3",2", 1" CONDUIT (STUB & CAP) 2" CONDUIT TO (SOP) HARDWOOD AVE AND HARDWOOD CT SIGNAL SYSTEM - PAD DETAILS SIGNAL PLAN C7.12 R 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214_C_SGNL_N1.dwg 2/26/2025 9:35:42 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA HARDWOOD AVENUE AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL DLR DLR BTN 132214DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BRYAN T. NEMETH 43354 03/05/2025 V-3V-1C H C H HC H HF V-4 V-2 FEETSCALE 0 20 40 RA 1 2-1 1 23 4 2-22-35-1 7-2 1-2 4-1 4-2 7-1 6-2 6-3 1-1 8-3 6-1 8-2 5-2 8-1 S.B. HARDWOOD AVENUE30 M.P.H.N.B. HARDWOOD AVENUE30 M.P.H.H A R DW OO D C O U R T 3 0 M . P . H . P R I V A T E D R I V E 23 4 1+6 EVP2+5 EVP4+7 EVP 8 EVP 1 2 3 4 5 HARDWOOD AVE AND HARDWOOD CT SIGNAL SYSTEM - LAYOUT FACE R 1-1,1-2 2-1,2-2,2-3 6-1,6-2,6-3 -ALL SIGNAL INDICATIONS SHALL BE 12" LED -FYA DENOTES FLASHING YELLOW ARROW -ALL HEADS SHALL BE BLACK POLYCARBONATE WITH BLACK BACKGROUND SHIELDS -ALL SIGNAL HEADS WITH FYA INDICATIONS SHALL BE BLACK POLYCARBONATE WITH YELLOW BACKGROUND SHIELDS OR BLACK BACKGROUND SHIELDS WITH A YELLOW REFLECTIVE TAPE BORDER 5-1,5-2 Y FYA G 4-1,4-2 SIGNAL HEAD CHART 7-1,7-2 8-1,8-2,8-3 CONTROLLER PHASING, PEDESTRIAN INDICATIONS AND PUSH BUTTONS -THE SIGNAL SYSTEM FLASH MODE IS ALL RED. -NORMAL OPERATION IS 8 PHASE, WITH PHASES 1, 5, AND 7 BEING FLASHING YELLOW ARROWS BY TIME OF DAY. -PHASES 2 AND 6 SHALL BE ON VEHICLE RECALL. SIGNAL SYSTEM OPERATION SIGNAL PLANV2-5V5-1V2-4V2-3V2-2V2-1V1-1V6-5V6-4V6-3V7-1 V4-2 V 4 - 1 V8-2 V 8 - 1 DIR. BORE 3" CONDUIT 3-6/C 16 4-4/C 16 1-3/C 16 (LUM) 1-3/C 16 (EVP) 1-3/C 20 (EVP) 1-3/C 18 (VIDEO) 2-2/C 14 1-1/C 6 INS. GR. DIR. BORE 3" CONDUIT 2-6/C 16 4-4/C 16 1-3/C 16 (LUM) 1-3/C 16 (EVP) 1-3/C 20 (EVP) 1-3/C 18 (VIDEO) 2-2/C 14 1-1/C 6 INS. GR. DIR. BORE 3" CONDUIT 2-6/C 16 6-4/C 16 1-3/C 16 (LUM) 1-3/C 16 (EVP) 1-3/C 20 (EVP) 1-3/C 18 (VIDEO) 2-2/C 14 1-1/C 6 INS. GR. DIR. BORE 3" CONDUIT 2-6/C 16 4-6/C 16 1-3/C 16 (LUM) 1-3/C 16 (EVP) 1-3/C 20 (EVP) 1-3/C 18 (VIDEO) 2-2/C 14 1-1/C 6 INS. GR. PED PB STATION 1-APS PB AND SIGN (RT ARROW)(PB6-2) EXTEND INTO HH3: 1" CONDUIT: 1-2/C 14 1-1/C 6 INS. GR. PED PB STATION 1-APS PB AND SIGN (RT ARROW)(PB8-2) EXTEND INTO HH4: 1" CONDUIT: 1-2/C 14 1-1/C 6 INS. GR. PED PB STATION 1-APS PB AND SIGN (RT ARROW)(PB2-2) EXTEND INTO HH1: 1" CONDUIT: 1-2/C 14 1-1/C 6 INS. GR. PED PB STATION 1-APS PB AND SIGN (LT ARROW)(PB2-1) EXTEND INTO HH2: 1" CONDUIT: 1-2/C 14 1-1/C 6 INS. GR. C7.13 P8-1 PB8-1 (D1) PB2-2 (A2) P2-2 P2-1 P4-2 PB2-1 (A1) PB4-2 (B2) PB4-1 (B1) PB6-2 (C2) P4-1 P6-2 P6-1 P8-2 PB6-1 (C1) PB8-2 (D2) 1 2 4 R 3 5 2 8 16 4 7 B R 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214_C_SGNL_N1.dwg 2/26/2025 9:35:48 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA HARDWOOD AVENUE AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL DLR DLR BTN 132214DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BRYAN T. NEMETH 43354 03/05/2025 CAMERA NUMBER LOCATION V-1 V-2 V-4 PHASE V-3 VIDEO DETECTION CHART POLE 1 2+5 POLE 2 4+7 POLE 3 1+6 POLE 4 8MATCHLI N E A 2" CONDUIT 1-3/C 16 (EVP) 1-3/C 20 (EVP) 1-1/C 6 INS. GR. DIR. BORE 3" CONDUIT 3-6/C 16 5-4/C 16 1-3/C 16 (LUM) 1-3/C 16 (EVP) 1-3/C 20 (EVP) 1-3/C 18 (VIDEO) 1-2/C 14 1-1/C 6 INS. GR. DIR. BORE 3" CONDUIT (SPARE) 1-1/C 6 INS. GR. PULL ROPE HSIGNAL PLAN V6-1 V6-2 C7.14 FEETSCALE 0 20 40 RS.B. H A R D W O O D A V E N U E 30 M. P . H . N.B. H A R D W O O D A V E N U E 30 M. P . H . H A R K N E S S A V E N U E 3 0 M . P . H . HARDWOOD AVE AND HARDWOOD CT SIGNAL SYSTEM - LAYOUT R 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214_C_SGNL_N1.dwg 2/26/2025 9:35:52 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA HARDWOOD AVENUE AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL DLR DLR BTN 132214DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BRYAN T. NEMETH 43354 03/05/2025 5 6 7MATCHLINE A2" CONDUIT 1-3/C 16 (EVP) 1-3/C 20 (EVP) 1-1/C 6 INS. GR. DIR. BORE 2" CONDUIT 1-3/C 16 (EVP) 1-3/C 20 (EVP) 1-1/C 6 INS. GR.1+6 EVP NOTES: 1. THE EXACT LOCATION OF HANDHOLES, POLES, PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON STATIONS, PEDESTALS, AND EQUIPMENT PAD SHALL BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD BY THE ENGINEER. 2. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING THE CONNECTION OF POWER FOR THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM. 3. FOR TYPE D SIGNS SEE DETAIL SHEET. ALL SIGNS REQUIRED ARE INCIDENTAL. 4. FOR PAVEMENT MARKINGS SEE SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN. 5. FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS, CONCRETE WALK, AND MEDIAN WORK, SEE CONSTRUCTION PLAN. 6. THIS PLAN SPECIFIES CONDUIT SIZES, TYPES, AND GENERAL LOCATIONS. THE EXACT LOCATIONS WILL BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD. CONDUITS UNDER THE ROADWAYS REQUIRE BORING. 7. ALL NEW CONDUITS SHALL BE SCHEDULE 80 PVC OR HDPE AND CARRY A 1/C #6 GREEN INSULATED GROUNDING CONDUCTOR AS SHOWN IN THE PLAN. HARDWOOD AVE AND HARDWOOD CT SIGNAL SYSTEM - LAYOUT SIGNAL PLAN 1 2 3X:467412.25 Y:132437.27 PA100 POLE FOUNDATION TYPE PA100-A-45-X30-6 (DAVIT AT 350 DEG) 1-ANGLE MOUNT SIGNAL OVERHEAD AT 0' 2-STRAIGHT MOUNT SIGNALS OVERHEAD AT 14.5' AND 27.5' 2-ANGLE MOUNT SIGNALS AT 90° AND 180° 2-ANGLE MOUNT C.D. PED HEAD AT 90° AND 180° 1-APS PB AND SIGN (LT ARROW)(PB8-1) 1-ONE WAY EVP DETECTOR AND CONFIRMATORY LIGHT AT 6' (PHASES 2+5) 1-VIDEO DETECTOR (V-1) AT 5' WITH 6' CAMERA MOUNTING EXTENSION LUMINAIRE-LED (FOR 40' MOUNTING HEIGHT) 1-R10-X12 SIGN ADJACENT TO HEAD (5-1) 1-SIGN (HARDWOOD CT)(SEE SIGN DETAILS) 3" CONDUIT TO HH 1: 3-6/C 16 5-4/C 16 1-3/C 16 (LUM) 1-3/C 16 (EVP) 1-3/C 20 (EVP) 1-3/C 18 (VIDEO) 1-2/C 14 1-1/C 6 INS. GR. X:467472.53 Y:132393.82 PA100 POLE FOUNDATION TYPE PA100-A-35-X30-6 (DAVIT AT 350 DEG) 1-ANGLE MOUNT SIGNAL OVERHEAD AT 0' 1-STRAIGHT MOUNT SIGNAL OVERHEAD AT 12.5' 2-ANGLE MOUNT SIGNALS AT 90° AND 180° 2-ANGLE MOUNT C.D. PED HEAD AT 90° AND 180° 1-APS PB AND SIGN (RT ARROW)(PB4-2) 1-ONE WAY EVP DETECTOR AND CONFIRMATORY LIGHT AT 6' (PHASES 4+7) 1-VIDEO DETECTOR (V-2) AT 5' WITH 6' CAMERA MOUNTING EXTENSION LUMINAIRE-LED (FOR 40' MOUNTING HEIGHT) 1-R10-X12 SIGN ADJACENT TO HEAD (7-1) 1-SIGN (HARDWOOD AVE)(SEE SIGN DETAILS) 3" CONDUIT TO HH 2: 3-6/C 16 4-4/C 16 1-3/C 16 (LUM) 1-3/C 16 (EVP) 1-3/C 20 (EVP) 1-3/C 18 (VIDEO) 1-2/C 14 1-1/C 6 INS. GR. X:467393.91 Y:132329.21 PA100 POLE FOUNDATION TYPE PA100-A-40-X30-6 (DAVIT AT 350 DEG) 1-ANGLE MOUNT SIGNAL OVERHEAD AT 0' 2-STRAIGHT MOUNT SIGNALS OVERHEAD AT 13' AND 25' 2-ANGLE MOUNT SIGNALS AT 90° AND 180° 2-ANGLE MOUNT C.D. PED HEAD AT 90° AND 180° 1-APS PB AND SIGN (LT ARROW)(PB4-1) 1-ONE WAY EVP DETECTOR AND CONFIRMATORY LIGHT AT 6' (PHASES 1+6) 1-VIDEO DETECTOR (V-3) AT 5' WITH 6' CAMERA MOUNTING EXTENSION LUMINAIRE-LED (FOR 40' MOUNTING HEIGHT) 1-R10-X12 SIGN ADJACENT TO HEAD (1-1) 1-SIGN (HARDWOOD CT)(SEE SIGN DETAILS) 3" CONDUIT TO HH 3: 2-6/C 16 6-4/C 16 1-3/C 16 (LUM) 1-3/C 16 (EVP) 1-3/C 20 (EVP) 1-3/C 18 (VIDEO) 1-2/C 14 1-1/C 6 INS. GR. 4 X:467338.02 Y:132362.37 PA100 POLE FOUNDATION TYPE PA100-A-15-X30-6 (DAVIT AT 350 DEG) 1-ANGLE MOUNT SIGNAL OVERHEAD AT 0' 2-ANGLE MOUNT SIGNALS AT 90° AND 180° 2-ANGLE MOUNT C.D. PED HEAD AT 90° AND 180° 1-APS PB AND SIGN (LT ARROW)(PB6-1) 1-ONE WAY EVP DETECTOR AND CONFIRMATORY LIGHT AT 2' (PHASE 8) 1-VIDEO DETECTOR (V-4) AT 5' WITH 6' CAMERA MOUNTING EXTENSION LUMINAIRE-LED (FOR 40' MOUNTING HEIGHT) 1-SIGN (HARDWOOD AVE)(SEE SIGN DETAILS) 3" CONDUIT TO HH 4: 2-6/C 16 4-4/C 16 1-3/C 16 (LUM) 1-3/C 16 (EVP) 1-3/C 20 (EVP) 1-3/C 18 (VIDEO) 1-2/C 14 1-1/C 6 INS. GR. C7.15 R 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214_C_SGNL_N1.dwg 2/26/2025 9:35:56 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA HARDWOOD AVENUE AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL DLR DLR BTN 132214DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BRYAN T. NEMETH 43354 03/05/2025 A5X:467283.49 Y:132909.52 PEDESTAL FOUNDATION 10' PEDESTAL POLE PLUS BASE 2" CONDUIT TO HH 7: 1-3/C 16 (EVP) 1-3/C 20 (EVP) 1-1/C 6 INS. GR. SOP-GROUND MOUNTED TRANSFORMER (XCEL ENERGY) EQUIPMENT PAD (SEE DETAIL SHEET) SERVICE CABINET (SSB WITH BATTERY BACKUP AND BATTERIES) CONTROLLER AND CABINET (TS2 TYPE 1) WITH GPS TIME CLOCK 3" CONDUIT FROM SIGNAL CONTROLLER TO: HH1: 3-6/C 16 5-4/C 16 1-3/C 16 (EVP) 1-3/C 20 (EVP) 1-3/C 18 (VIDEO) 2-2/C 14 1-1/C 6 INS. GR. HH5: 2-6/C 16 6-4/C 16 1-3/C 16 (EVP) 1-3/C 20 (EVP) 1-3/C 18 (VIDEO) 2-2/C 14 1-1/C 6 INS. GR. GROUND WIRE AND GROUND ROD - 8' MIN OUT FROM PAD 1-1", 1-2", 1-3" CONDUIT STUBBED OUT (CAPPED BOTH ENDS) CONTROLLER CABINET TO SERVICE CABINET: 2-2" CONDUIT 3-1/C 6 1-3/C 16 (BATTERY BACKUP) 1-6PR 19 (CABINET COMMS) SERVICE CABINET TO GROUND MOUNTED TRANSFORMER: 2" CONDUIT 3-1/C 2 SERVICE CABINET TO HH1: 2" CONDUIT 2-3/C 16 (LUM) SERVICE CABINET TO HH5: 2" CONDUIT 2-3/C 16 (LUM) SERVICE CABINET TO EXTERNAL GR. RD.: 1-1/C 6 INS. GR. (SEE EQUIPMENT PAD DETAIL) HH1: 3-6/C 16 4-4/C 16 1-3/C 16 (EVP) 1-3/C 20 (EVP) 1-3/C 18 (VIDEO) 2-2/C 14 1-1/C 6 INS. GR. HH5: 2-6/C 16 4-4/C 16 1-3/C 16 (EVP) 1-3/C 20 (EVP) 1-3/C 18 (VIDEO) 2-2/C 14 1-1/C 6 INS. GR. B NOTES: 1.ALL CABLES SHALL BE CONTINUOUS FROM CABINET TO SIGNAL COMPONENTS. 2.SIGNAL SYSTEM INCLUDES BATTERY - BACKUP SERVICE CABINET (WITH BATTERIES). 3.FOR CONDUCTOR COLOR CODE SEE TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE WIRING CONNECTOR COLOR CODE DETAIL. 4.FOR EACH "SPARE WIRE, COIL ENOUGH WIRE TO REACH THE END OF THE MAST ARM IN THE HAND HOLE NEAREST TO EACH POLE. 5.LEAVE ONE LOOP OF SLACK FOR EACH CABLE IN THE POLE BASE. HARDWOOD AVE AND HARDWOOD CT SIGNAL SYSTEM - WIRING DIAGRAM SIGNAL PLAN 2 4+7 EVP EVP LIGHT 4+7 EVP DETECTOR TO EVP HUB CONTROLLER CABINET RLA YLA GLA NEU FYA SPR 5-1 EVP LIGHT 2+5 EQ. G NEU 2+5 EVP DETECTOR PB8-1 INS. GR. PB2-2 1 2+5 EVP EVP LIGHT 2+5 EVP DETECTOR TO EVP HUB DWK WLK SPR NEU P2-2 PB2-1 2 POWER INPUT SERVICE CABINET 3 LUMINAIRE LUMINAIRE 4 3-1/C 6 5 LUMINAIRE 64 3-1/C 2 LUMINAIRE SIGNAL SERVICE 1 3,4 3 2 1 GR.RD.GR.RD. 1-1/C 6 2 HH 2 4 LUMINAIRE 2 HH 1 GR.RD. CAMERA V-1 POWER CAMERA V-2 POWER 19 2030 28 10 17 19 18 33 32 31 35 1829 POWER V-1 CAMERA20 24 DWK WLK SPR NEU P2-126 EVP LIGHT 4+7 EQ. G NEU 29 4+7 EVP DETECTOR 28 POWER V-2 CAMERA30 5,6 P8-1 16 DWK WLK SPR NEU P8-116 31 HH 5 3-1/C 6 SIGNAL SERVICE 2 21-31,34-35 4,21-31,34-35 CABINET COMMS 1-6PR 1991CABINET COMMS 1-6PR 19 91 91 3 LUMINAIRE 1 DWK WLK SPR NEU P4-227 3,4 10-20,31-33 GR.RD. S.O.P. TO PB PED PB STA PB2-2 33 31 TO PB PED PB STA PB2-1 35 P4-2 27 1 PB6-157 DWK WLK SPR NEU P6-140 EVP LIGHT 8 EQ. G NEU 43 8 EVP DETECTOR 42 POWER V-4 CAMERA44 DWK WLK SPR NEU P8-241 PB4-234 INS. GR.56 31 INS. GR.31 INS. GR. HH 5 4 8 EVP EVP LIGHT 8 EVP DETECTOR TO EVP HUB 3 1+6 EVP EVP LIGHT 1+6 EVP DETECTOR TO EVP HUB P6-2 HH 4 6 LUMINAIRE 4 HH 3 GR.RD. CAMERA V-3 POWER CAMERA V-4 POWER 52 54 5544 42 5343 P4-1 51 56 5,45-56,59-60 5,45-56,59-60 5 LUMINAIRE 3 6,36-44,56-58 GR.RD. TO PB PED PB STA PB6-2 60 56 TO PB PED PB PB6-1 56 TO PB PED PB STA PB8-2 58 P8-2 41 P6-1 40 INS. GR. 56 INS. GR.56 INS. GR. 57 45-56,59-60 36-44,56-58 PB4-159 PB6-260 POWER V-3 CAMERA55 EVP LIGHT 1+6 EQ. G NEU 54 1+6 EVP DETECTOR 53 DWK WLK SPR NEU P6-252 DWK WLK SPR NEU P4-151 PB8-258 C7.16 P2-1 26 4-1 RED YEL GRN NEU 4-1 TO PB PED PB PB8-1 31INS. GR. 32TO PB PED PB PB4-2 31INS. GR. 34 TO PB PED PB PB4-1 56INS. GR. 59 R 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214_C_SGNL_N1.dwg 2/26/2025 9:36:01 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA HARDWOOD AVENUE AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL DLR DLR BTN 132214DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BRYAN T. NEMETH 43354 03/05/2025 HH 6 HH 7 1+6 EVP EVP LIGHT 1+6 EVP DETECTOR TO EVP HUB 6261 56 INS. GR. GR.RD. 56 5 EVP LIGHT 1+6 EQ. G NEU 62 1+6 EVP DETECTOR 61 56,61-62 56,61-62 56,61-62 24 4-2 25 21 7-1 10 5-1 2-3 15 2-2 14 2-1 13 8-1 38 8-2 39 36 5-2 45 1-1 8-3 47 6-2 49 6-3 50 11 7-2 12 (SPARE) 17 P2-2 22 1-2 23 (SPARE) 37 (SPARE) 46 (SPARE) 6-1 48 RLA YLA GLA NEU FYA SPR 7-211 SPR SPR SPR NEU SPR SPR SPARE12 RED YEL GRN NEU 2-113 RED YEL GRN NEU 2-214 RED YEL GRN NEU 2-315 RLA YLA GLA NEU FYA SPR 7-121 RLA YLA GLA NEU FYA SPR 1-222 SPR SPR SPR NEU SPR SPR SPARE23 25 RED YEL GRN NEU 4-2 RLA YLA GLA NEU FYA SPR 5-236 SPR SPR SPR NEU SPR SPR SPARE37 38 RED YEL GRN NEU 8-1 39 RED YEL GRN NEU 8-2 RLA YLA GLA NEU FYA SPR 1-145 48 RED YEL GRN NEU 6-1 49 RED YEL GRN NEU 6-2 50 RED YEL GRN NEU 6-3 SPR SPR SPR NEU SPR SPR SPARE46 47 RED YEL GRN NEU 8-3 31HH 3 FROM 31 TO HH 2 811-3/C 16BATTERY BACKUP 81 1-3/C 16 BATTERY BACKUP 81 31 V-3V-1C H C HC H HF V-4 V-2 4.5157.9 17 61212 72.7 1089 9.5 15.9 4.56624144 D-2; 3.0" Radius, 1.0" Border, White on Green; Arrow 6 - 17.0" 180°; "Hardwood Ct", D 2K; 7.9 36.9 47.1 56.2 61.7 70.4 84.9 93.6 102.4 118.6 124.9HardwoodCt 6127 72.7 1089 18.3 7 6624114 D-1; 3.0" Radius, 1.0" Border, White on Green; "Hardwood Ave", D 2K; 7.0 17.2 26.3 31.9 40.5 55.0 63.8 72.5 88.7 95.9 102.3HardwoodAve 1215.9 72.7 89 9.5 1512 17 7.9 24144 D-3; 3.0" Radius, 1.0" Border, White on Green; "Hardwood Ct", D 2K; Arrow 6 - 17.0" 0°; 15.9 26.1 35.2 40.7 49.4 63.9 72.6 81.4 97.6 103.9 119.1 Hardw ood Ct 4.5664.5610SPECIFIC NOTE(S): GENERAL NOTE(S): 1. SEE MnDOT STANDARD SIGNS AND MARKINGS MANUAL FOR STANDARD SIGN DESIGNS, ARROW DETAILS AND SPLICE PLATE DETAILS. 2. FOR NON STANDARD SIGN DESIGNS, LAYOUTS ARE INCLUDED. SIGN PANEL DIMENSIONS ARE IN INCHES. 3. SEE STANDARD PLAN 5-297.731 FOR SIGN MOUNTING TO MAST ARM. 4. SEE STANDARD PLAN 5-297.730 FOR SIGN MOUNTING TO ROUND POST. 5. MOUNTING HEIGHT OF POLE MOUNTED SIGN PANELS MUST BE 7 FOOT MINIMUM. MOUNTING HEIGHT IS MEASURED FROM BOTTOM OF SIGN PANEL TO SURFACE IMMEDIATELY BELOW THE SIGN PANEL. 6. "A" DISTANCE = DISTANCE FROM THE END OF THE MAST ARM TO THE EDGE OF EACH SIGN PANEL. 7. SEE INTERSECTION LAYOUT FOR SIGN PLACEMENT OF POLE MOUNTED SIGNS. 8. INSTALL R10-X12 ADJACENT TO SIGNAL HEADS 1-1, 5-1, AND 7-1. HARDWOOD AVE AND HARDWOOD CT SIGNAL SYSTEM - SIGN DETAILS SIGNAL PLAN C7.17 R SIGN PANELS ON SIGNALS POLENUMBER "A" DISTANCE (FEET) OR POLE PANEL CODE NUMBER LEGEND SIZE(INCHES)AREA (SQ FT) 1 -R10-X12 LEFT TURN YIELD ON FLASHING YELLOW ARROW42 x 48 14.00128.5 D-3 HARDWOOD CT (RIGHT ARROW)144 x 24 24.002-R10-X12 LEFT TURN YIELD ON FLASHING YELLOW ARROW42 x 48 14.00214.5 D-1 HARDWOOD AVE 114 x 24 19.00 3 26 D-2 HARDWOOD CT (LEFT ARROW)144 x 24 24.0043.5 D-1 HARDWOOD AVE 114 x 24 19.00 ON LEFT TURNYIELD FLASHING YELLOW ARROW ONLEFT TURNYIELDFLASHINGYELLOWARROWONLEFT TURNYIELDFLASHINGYELLOWARROW1 2 3 4 3 -R10-X12 LEFT TURN YIELD ON FLASHING YELLOW ARROW42 x 48 14.00 D-1D-2D-1D-3 D-1 FEETSCALE 0 5 10 R 3507 HIGH POINT DRIVE NORTH BLDG. 1 SUITE E130 OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55128 Phone: (651) 704-9970 Email: Oakdale@bolton-menk.com www.bolton-menk.com SHEET Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights ReservedcH:\COTT\0N1132214\CAD\C3D\132214_C_SGNL_N1.dwg 2/26/2025 9:36:09 AMDESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJ. NO. ISSUED FOR DATENO.COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA HARDWOOD AVENUE AND HARDWOOD COURT SIGNAL DLR DLR BTN 132214DATELIC. NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BRYAN T. NEMETH 43354 03/05/2025 D-2 D-3 CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2025-028 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING BIDDING FOR THE 2025 MILL AND OVERLAY AND HARDWOOD COURT INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, plans and specifications have been prepared in accordance with the City Standards and Specifications for the 2025 Mill and Overlay and Hardwood Court Intersection Improvements; and WHEREAS, a bid date will be set by City staff; and WHEREAS, the Public Works Director has presented such plans and specifications to the City Council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, approves the plans and specifications and authorizes bidding, for the 2025 Mill and Overlay and Hardwood Court Intersection Improvements. Passed this 5th day of March 2025. Myron Bailey, Mayor Attest: Tamara Anderson, City Clerk 1 City Council Action Request 8.A. Meeting Date 3/5/2025 Department Finance Agenda Category Action Item Title Approve Disbursements Staff Recommendation Approve disbursements from 02-14-2025 through 02-27-2025 in the amount of $3,735,955.06. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. Expense Approval Report 3-05-2025 Council Meeting 2. Payroll Check Register 03-05-25 Council Meeting 3. UB Check Register 03-05-25 Council Meeting 1 City Council Action Request 11.A. Meeting Date 3/5/2025 Department Finance Agenda Category Action Item Title Sale of $10,000,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2025A Staff Recommendation Adopt Resolution 2025-024, authorizing the issuance and awarding the sale of the $10,000,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2025A, pledging for the security thereof special assessments, net revenues, and tax abatement and levying a tax for the payment thereof. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. cc memo 2025A Bond Sale for 03-05-2025 Meeting 2. Cottage Grove GO Bonds 2025A Resolution for Council Packets Ad To:Mayor and City Council Members Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From:Brenda Malinowski, Finance Director Date:March 5, 2025 Subject:Sale of the $10,000,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2025A Introduction The City Council called for the sale of the $10,000,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2025A at the meeting on February 5, 2025. These bonds will finance the construction of the 2025 Pavement Management project, Low Zone Water Tower project, equipment, and the River Oaks irrigation project. The funding was identified in both the 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Plan and the Financial Management Plan. The bonds will be repaid with water area charges to developers (water tower project), special assessments (pavement management), golf course revenues (irrigation project), and future property tax levies (portion of pavement management and equipment). The future property tax levies were included in the Financial Management Plan that was utilized in the 2025 Budget process. Discussion Ehlers will accept and open bids on the City’s behalf at 10:00 AM on March 5, 2025. The bids will be tabulated and will be shared with the City Council at the meeting. Requested Action Review the information presented at the City Council meeting and consider adoption of Resolution 2025-024 providing for the issuance and sale of the $10,000,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2025A. A generic copy of the resolution is provided with this item and will be replaced with the actual resolution after the bids have been opened on Wednesday. 171262793v1 EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA HELD: MARCH 5, 2025 Pursuant to due call, a regular or special meeting of the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, Washington County, Minnesota, was duly held at the City Hall on March 5, 2025, at 7:00 P.M., for the purpose, in part of authorizing the issuance and awarding the sale of $10,000,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2025A. The following members were present: and the following were absent: Member __________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2025-24 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND AWARDING THE SALE OF $10,000,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2025A, PLEDGING FOR THE SECURITY THEREOF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS, NET REVENUES AND TAX ABATEMENTS AND LEVYING A TAX FOR THE PAYMENT THEREOF A. WHEREAS, the City Council has heretofore determined and declared that it is necessary and expedient to issue $10,000,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2025A (the "Bonds" or individually a "Bond"), pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 475; and 1. Section 412.301 to finance the acquisition of capital equipment (the "Equipment"); and 2. Section 429 to finance the construction of the City's 2025 pavement management projects (the "Improvements"); and 3. Section 444.075 to finance the construction of a water tower (the "Utility Improvements"); and 4. Sections 469.1812 through 469.1815, particularly Section 469.1814, to finance the costs related to improvements to the golf course irrigation system (the "Tax Abatement Project"). B. WHEREAS, each item of Equipment to be financed by the Equipment Portion of the Bonds, as hereinafter defined, has an expected useful life of at least as long as the term of the Equipment Portion of the Bonds; and C. WHEREAS, the amount of the principal amount of the Equipment Portion of the Bonds, as hereinafter defined, exceeds one-quarter of one percent (0.25%) of the estimated 171262793v1 2 market value of the taxable property in the City ($6,368,295,800 times 0.25% is $15,920,740); and D. WHEREAS, the Improvements and all their components have been ordered prior to the date hereof, after a hearing thereon for which notice was given describing the Improvements or all their components by general nature, estimated cost, and area to be assessed; and E. WHEREAS, the City owns and operates a municipal water system (the "Water System"), a municipal sanitary sewer system (the "Sanitary Sewer System"), and a municipal stormwater system (the "Stormwater System" and, together with the Water System and the Sanitary Sewer System, the "System"), as separate revenue producing public utilities; and F. WHEREAS, the net revenues of the System are pledged to the payment of the City's outstanding $16,025,000 original principal amount of General Obligation Bonds, Series 2024A, dated March 12, 2024 (collectively, the "Outstanding Utility Bonds") G. WHEREAS, on February 19, 2025, following duly published notice thereof, the Council held a public hearing on the proposed abatement to finance the Tax Abatement Project and all persons who wished to speak or provide written information relative to the public hearing were afforded an opportunity to do so; and H. WHEREAS, the City has heretofore established a tax abatement program (the "Tax Abatement Program") pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.1812 through 469.1815, with respect to providing for the abatement of property taxes for a period of fifteen (15) years on various properties in the City, as described in the resolution adopted by the City Council on February 19, 2025, approving the Tax Abatement Program (the "Tax Abatement Resolution"); and I. WHEREAS, the amount of the property taxes abated are estimated to be at least equal to the principal on the Tax Abatement Portion of the Bonds, as hereinafter defined, and pursuant to the provisions of the Tax Abatement Resolution, Bond proceeds are to be expended to provide money to pay for the Tax Abatement Project; and J. WHEREAS, the City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc., in Roseville, Minnesota ("Ehlers"), as its independent municipal advisor for the sale of the Bonds and was therefore authorized to sell the Bonds by private negotiation in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2(9) and proposals to purchase the Bonds have been solicited by Ehlers; and K. WHEREAS, the proposals set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto were received by the City Clerk, or designee, at the office of Ehlers, at 10:00 A.M. on the date hereof, pursuant to the Preliminary Official Statement for the Bonds, dated February 20, 2025; and L. WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the City that the Bonds be issued in book- entry form as hereinafter provided; and 171262793v1 3 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Acceptance of Proposal. The proposal of ___________________, in _____________, ________________ (the "Purchaser"), to purchase the Bonds in accordance with the Preliminary Official Statement, at the rates of interest hereinafter set forth, and to pay therefor the sum of $_______________, plus interest accrued to settlement, is hereby found, determined and declared to be the most favorable proposal received and is hereby accepted and the Bonds are hereby awarded to the Purchaser. The Finance Director is directed to retain the deposit of the Purchaser. 2. Bond Terms. (a) Original Issue Date; Denominations; Maturities; Term Bond Option. The Bonds shall be dated March 25, 2025, as the date of original issue and shall be issued forthwith on or after such date in fully registered form, shall be numbered from R-1 upward in the denomination of $5,000 each or in any integral multiple thereof of a single maturity (the "Authorized Denominations") and shall mature on February 1 in the years and amounts as follows: Year Amount Year Amount 2027 2035 2028 2036 2029 2037 2030 2038 2031 2039 2032 2040 2033 2041 2034 As may be requested by the Purchaser, one or more term Bonds may be issued having mandatory sinking fund redemption and final maturity amounts conforming to the foregoing principal repayment schedule, and corresponding additions may be made to the provisions of the applicable Bond(s). (b) Allocation. The aggregate principal amount of $___________ maturing in each of the years and amounts hereinafter set forth are issued to finance the Equipment (the "Equipment Portion" of the Bonds"); and the aggregate principal amount of $_____________ maturing in each of the years and amounts hereinafter set forth are issued to finance the Improvements (the "Improvement Portion" of the Bonds); and the aggregate principal amount of $_____________ maturing in each of the years and amounts hereinafter set forth are issued to finance the Utility Improvements (the "Utility Revenue Portion" of the Bonds); and the aggregate principal amount of $_____________ maturing in each of the years and amounts hereinafter set forth are issued to finance the Tax Abatement Project (the "Tax Abatement Portion" of the Bonds). 171262793v1 4 Year Equipment Portion Improvement Portion Utility Revenue Portion Tax Abatement Portion Total 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 If Bonds are prepaid, the prepayments shall be allocated to the portions of debt service (and hence allocated to the payment of Bonds treated as relating to a particular portion of debt service) as provided in this paragraph. If the source of prepayment moneys is the general fund of the City, or other generally available source, including the levy of taxes, the prepayment may be allocated to any portions of debt service in such amounts as the City shall determine. If the source of the prepayment is special assessments pledged to the Improvements, the prepayment shall be allocated to the Improvement Portion of debt service. If the source of a prepayment is excess net revenues of the System pledged to the Utility Improvements, the prepayment shall be allocated to the Utility Revenue Portion of debt service. If the source of a prepayment is taxes abated for the Tax Abatement Project, the prepayment shall be allocated to the Tax Abatement Portion of debt service. (c) Book Entry Only System. The Depository Trust Company, a limited purpose trust company organized under the laws of the State of New York or any of its successors or its successors to its functions hereunder (the "Depository") will act as securities depository for the Bonds, and to this end: (i) The Bonds shall be initially issued and, so long as they remain in book entry form only (the "Book Entry Only Period"), shall at all times be in the form of a separate single fully registered Bond for each maturity of the Bonds; and for purposes of complying with this requirement under paragraphs 5 and 10 Authorized Denominations for any Bond shall be deemed to be limited during the Book Entry Only Period to the outstanding principal amount of that Bond. (ii) Upon initial issuance, ownership of the Bonds shall be registered in a bond register maintained by the Bond Registrar (as hereinafter defined) in the name of CEDE 171262793v1 5 & CO., as the nominee (it or any nominee of the existing or a successor Depository, the "Nominee"). (iii) With respect to the Bonds neither the City nor the Bond Registrar shall have any responsibility or obligation to any broker, dealer, bank, or any other financial institution for which the Depository holds Bonds as securities depository (the "Participant") or the person for which a Participant holds an interest in the Bonds shown on the books and records of the Participant (the "Beneficial Owner"). Without limiting the immediately preceding sentence, neither the City, nor the Bond Registrar, shall have any such responsibility or obligation with respect to (A) the accuracy of the records of the Depository, the Nominee or any Participant with respect to any ownership interest in the Bonds, or (B) the delivery to any Participant, any Owner or any other person, other than the Depository, of any notice with respect to the Bonds, including any notice of redemption, or (C) the payment to any Participant, any Beneficial Owner or any other person, other than the Depository, of any amount with respect to the principal of or premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds, or (D) the consent given or other action taken by the Depository as the Registered Holder of any Bonds (the "Holder"). For purposes of securing the vote or consent of any Holder under this Resolution, the City may, however, rely upon an omnibus proxy under which the Depository assigns its consenting or voting rights to certain Participants to whose accounts the Bonds are credited on the record date identified in a listing attached to the omnibus proxy. (iv) The City and the Bond Registrar may treat as and deem the Depository to be the absolute owner of the Bonds for the purpose of payment of the principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds, for the purpose of giving notices of redemption and other matters with respect to the Bonds, for the purpose of obtaining any consent or other action to be taken by Holders for the purpose of registering transfers with respect to such Bonds, and for all purpose whatsoever. The Bond Registrar, as paying agent hereunder, shall pay all principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds only to the Holder or the Holders of the Bonds as shown on the bond register, and all such payments shall be valid and effective to fully satisfy and discharge the City's obligations with respect to the principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. (v) Upon delivery by the Depository to the Bond Registrar of written notice to the effect that the Depository has determined to substitute a new Nominee in place of the existing Nominee, and subject to the transfer provisions in paragraph 10 hereof, references to the Nominee hereunder shall refer to such new Nominee. (vi) So long as any Bond is registered in the name of a Nominee, all payments with respect to the principal of and premium, if any, and interest on such Bond and all notices with respect to such Bond shall be made and given, respectively, by the Bond Registrar or City, as the case may be, to the Depository as provided in the Letter of Representations to the Depository required by the Depository as a condition to its acting as book-entry Depository for the Bonds (said Letter of Representations, together with any replacement thereof or amendment or substitute thereto, including any standard procedures or policies referenced therein or applicable thereto respecting the procedures 171262793v1 6 and other matters relating to the Depository's role as book-entry Depository for the Bonds, collectively hereinafter referred to as the "Letter of Representations"). (vii) All transfers of beneficial ownership interests in each Bond issued in book-entry form shall be limited in principal amount to Authorized Denominations and shall be effected by procedures by the Depository with the Participants for recording and transferring the ownership of beneficial interests in such Bonds. (viii) In connection with any notice or other communication to be provided to the Holders pursuant to this Resolution by the City or Bond Registrar with respect to any consent or other action to be taken by Holders, the Depository shall consider the date of receipt of notice requesting such consent or other action as the record date for such consent or other action; provided, that the City or the Bond Registrar may establish a special record date for such consent or other action. The City or the Bond Registrar shall, to the extent possible, give the Depository notice of such special record date not less than fifteen calendar days in advance of such special record date to the extent possible. (ix) Any successor Bond Registrar in its written acceptance of its duties under this Resolution and any paying agency/bond registrar agreement, shall agree to take any actions necessary from time to time to comply with the requirements of the Letter of Representations. (d) Termination of Book-Entry Only System. Discontinuance of a particular Depository's services and termination of the book-entry only system may be effected as follows: (i) The Depository may determine to discontinue providing its services with respect to the Bonds at any time by giving written notice to the City and discharging its responsibilities with respect thereto under applicable law. The City may terminate the services of the Depository with respect to the Bond if it determines that the Depository is no longer able to carry out its functions as securities depository or the continuation of the system of book-entry transfers through the Depository is not in the best interests of the City or the Beneficial Owners. (ii) Upon termination of the services of the Depository as provided in the preceding paragraph, and if no substitute securities depository is willing to undertake the functions of the Depository hereunder can be found which, in the opinion of the City, is willing and able to assume such functions upon reasonable or customary terms, or if the City determines that it is in the best interests of the City or the Beneficial Owners of the Bond that the Beneficial Owners be able to obtain certificates for the Bonds, the Bonds shall no longer be registered as being registered in the bond register in the name of the Nominee, but may be registered in whatever name or names the Holder of the Bonds shall designate at that time, in accordance with paragraph 10. To the extent that the Beneficial Owners are designated as the transferee by the Holders, in accordance with paragraph 10, the Bonds will be delivered to the Beneficial Owners. (iii) Nothing in this subparagraph (d) shall limit or restrict the provisions of paragraph 10. 171262793v1 7 (e) Letter of Representations. The provisions in the Letter of Representations are incorporated herein by reference and made a part of the resolution, and if and to the extent any such provisions are inconsistent with the other provisions of this resolution, the provisions in the Letter of Representations shall control. 3. Purposes. The Street Reconstruction Portion of the Bonds shall provide funds to finance the Street Reconstruction Projects. The Improvement Portion of the Bonds shall provide funds to finance the Improvements. The Utility Revenue Portion of the Bonds shall provide funds to finance the Utility Improvements. The Equipment Portion of the Bonds shall provide funds to finance the acquisition of the Equipment. The Street Reconstruction Projects, the Improvements, the Utility Improvements and the Equipment, are herein referred to together as the Project. The total cost of the Project, which shall include all costs enumerated in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.65, is estimated to be at least equal to the amount of the Bonds. The City covenants that it shall do all things and perform all acts required of it to assure that work on the Project proceeds with due diligence to completion and that any and all permits and studies required under law for the Project are obtained. 4. Interest. The Bonds shall bear interest payable semiannually on February 1 and August 1 of each year (each, an "Interest Payment Date"), commencing February 1, 2026, calculated on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months, at the respective rates per annum set forth opposite the maturity years as follows: Maturity Year Interest Rate Maturity Year Interest Rate 2027 %2035 % 2028 2036 2029 2037 2030 2038 2031 2039 2032 2040 2033 2041 2034 5. Redemption. All Bonds maturing on February 1, 2036 and thereafter, shall be subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the City on February 1, 2035, and on any date thereafter at a price of par plus accrued interest. Redemption may be in whole or in part of the Bonds subject to prepayment. If redemption is in part, the maturities and the principal amounts within each maturity to be redeemed shall be determined by the City; and if only part of the Bonds having a common maturity date are called for prepayment, the specific Bonds to be prepaid shall be chosen by lot by the Bond Registrar. Bonds or portions thereof called for redemption shall be due and payable on the redemption date, and interest thereon shall cease to accrue from and after the redemption date. Mailed notice of redemption shall be given to the paying agent and to each affected registered holder of the Bonds not more than sixty (60) days and not fewer than thirty (30) days prior to the date fixed for redemption. To effect a partial redemption of Bonds having a common maturity date, the Bond Registrar prior to giving notice of redemption shall assign to each Bond having a common 171262793v1 8 maturity date a distinctive number for each $5,000 of the principal amount of such Bond. The Bond Registrar shall then select by lot, using such method of selection as it shall deem proper in its discretion, from the numbers so assigned to such Bonds, as many numbers as, at $5,000 for each number, shall equal the principal amount of such Bonds to be redeemed. The Bonds to be redeemed shall be the Bonds to which were assigned numbers so selected; provided, however, that only so much of the principal amount of each such Bond of a denomination of more than $5,000 shall be redeemed as shall equal $5,000 for each number assigned to it and so selected. If a Bond is to be redeemed only in part, it shall be surrendered to the Bond Registrar (with, if the City or Bond Registrar so requires, a written instrument of transfer in form satisfactory to the City and Bond Registrar duly executed by the Holder thereof or the Holder's attorney duly authorized in writing) and the City shall execute (if necessary) and the Bond Registrar shall authenticate and deliver to the Holder of the Bond, without service charge, a new Bond or Bonds having the same stated maturity and interest rate and of any Authorized Denomination or Denominations, as requested by the Holder, in aggregate principal amount equal to and in exchange for the unredeemed portion of the principal of the Bond so surrendered. 6. Bond Registrar. Bond Trust Services Corporation, in Roseville, Minnesota, is appointed to act as bond registrar and transfer agent with respect to the Bonds (the "Bond Registrar"), and shall do so unless and until a successor Bond Registrar is duly appointed, all pursuant to any contract the City and Bond Registrar shall execute which is consistent herewith. The Bond Registrar shall also serve as paying agent unless and until a successor-paying agent is duly appointed. Principal and interest on the Bonds shall be paid to the registered holders (or record holders) of the Bonds in the manner set forth in the form of Bond and paragraph 12. 7. Form of Bond. The Bonds, together with the Bond Registrar's Certificate of Authentication, the form of Assignment and the registration information thereon, shall be in substantially the following form: 171262793v1 9 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA WASHINGTON COUNTY CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE R-_______ $_________ GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND, SERIES 2025A Interest Rate Maturity Date Date of Original Issue CUSIP ________%February 1,March 25, 2025 REGISTERED OWNER: CEDE & CO. PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: ____________________________ The City of Cottage Grove, Washington County, Minnesota (the "Issuer"), certifies that it is indebted and for value received promises to pay to the registered owner specified above, or registered assigns, unless called for earlier redemption, in the manner hereinafter set forth, the principal amount specified above, on the maturity date specified above, and to pay interest thereon semiannually on February 1 and August 1 of each year (each, an "Interest Payment Date"), commencing February 1, 2026, at the rate per annum specified above (calculated on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months) until the principal sum is paid or has been provided for. This Bond will bear interest from the most recent Interest Payment Date to which interest has been paid or, if no interest has been paid, from the date of original issue hereof. The principal of and premium, if any, on this Bond are payable upon presentation and surrender hereof at the principal office of Bond Trust Services Corporation, in Roseville, Minnesota (the "Bond Registrar"), acting as paying agent, or any successor paying agent duly appointed by the Issuer. Interest on this Bond will be paid on each Interest Payment Date by check or draft mailed to the person in whose name this Bond is registered (the "Holder" or "Bondholder") on the registration books of the Issuer maintained by the Bond Registrar and at the address appearing thereon at the close of business on the fifteenth day of the calendar month next preceding such Interest Payment Date (the "Regular Record Date"). Any interest not so timely paid shall cease to be payable to the person who is the Holder hereof as of the Regular Record Date, and shall be payable to the person who is the Holder hereof at the close of business on a date (the "Special Record Date") fixed by the Bond Registrar whenever money becomes available for payment of the defaulted interest. Notice of the Special Record Date shall be given to Bondholders not less than ten days prior to the Special Record Date. The principal of and premium, if any, and interest on this Bond are payable in lawful money of the United States of America. So long as this Bond is registered in the name of the Depository or its Nominee as provided in the Resolution hereinafter described, and as those terms are defined therein, payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on this Bond and notice with respect thereto shall be made as provided in the Letter of Representations, as defined in the Resolution, and surrender of this Bond shall not be required for payment of the redemption price upon a partial redemption of this Bond. Until termination of the book-entry only system pursuant to the Resolution, Bonds may only be registered in the name of the Depository or its Nominee. 171262793v1 10 Optional Redemption. All Bonds of this issue (the "Bonds") maturing on February 1, 2036, and thereafter, are subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the Issuer on February 1, 2035, and on any date thereafter at a price of par plus accrued interest. Redemption may be in whole or in part of the Bonds subject to prepayment. If redemption is in part, the maturities and the principal amounts within each maturity to be redeemed shall be determined by the Issuer; and if only part of the Bonds having a common maturity date are called for prepayment, the specific Bonds to be prepaid shall be chosen by lot by the Bond Registrar. Bonds or portions thereof called for redemption shall be due and payable on the redemption date, and interest thereon shall cease to accrue from and after the redemption date. Mailed notice of redemption shall be given to the paying agent and to each affected registered holder of the Bonds not more than sixty (60) days and not fewer than thirty (30) days prior to the date fixed for redemption. Selection of Bonds for Redemption; Partial Redemption. To effect a partial redemption of Bonds having a common maturity date, the Bond Registrar shall assign to each Bond having a common maturity date a distinctive number for each $5,000 of the principal amount of such Bond. The Bond Registrar shall then select by lot, using such method of selection as it shall deem proper in its discretion, from the numbers assigned to the Bonds, as many numbers as, at $5,000 for each number, shall equal the principal amount of such Bonds to be redeemed. The Bonds to be redeemed shall be the Bonds to which were assigned numbers so selected; provided, however, that only so much of the principal amount of such Bond of a denomination of more than $5,000 shall be redeemed as shall equal $5,000 for each number assigned to it and so selected. If a Bond is to be redeemed only in part, it shall be surrendered to the Bond Registrar (with, if the Issuer or Bond Registrar so requires, a written instrument of transfer in form satisfactory to the Issuer and Bond Registrar duly executed by the Holder thereof or the Holder's attorney duly authorized in writing) and the Issuer shall execute (if necessary) and the Bond Registrar shall authenticate and deliver to the Holder of the Bond, without service charge, a new Bond or Bonds having the same stated maturity and interest rate and of any Authorized Denomination or Denominations, as requested by the Holder, in aggregate principal amount equal to and in exchange for the unredeemed portion of the principal of the Bond so surrendered. Issuance; Purpose; General Obligation. This Bond is one of an issue in the total principal amount of $10,000,000, all of like date of original issue and tenor, except as to number, maturity, interest rate, denomination and redemption privilege, issued pursuant to and in full conformity with the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota and pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on March 5, 2025 (the "Resolution"), for the purpose of providing money to finance (i) the acquisition of capital equipment; (ii) the Issuer's 2025 pavement management projects; (iii) the construction of a water tower; and (iv) the costs related to improvements to the golf course irrigation system, all within the jurisdiction of the Issuer. This Bond is payable out of the General Obligation Bonds, Series 2025A Fund of the Issuer. This Bond constitutes a general obligation of the Issuer, and to provide moneys for the prompt and full payment of its principal, premium, if any, and interest when the same become due, the full faith and credit and taxing powers of the Issuer have been and are hereby irrevocably pledged. Denominations; Exchange; Resolution. The Bonds are issuable solely in fully registered form in Authorized Denominations (as defined in the Resolution) and are exchangeable for fully registered Bonds of other Authorized Denominations in equal aggregate principal amounts at the 171262793v1 11 office of the Bond Registrar, but only in the manner and subject to the limitations provided in the Resolution. Reference is hereby made to the Resolution for a description of the rights and duties of the Bond Registrar. Copies of the Resolution are on file in the office of the Bond Registrar. Transfer. This Bond is transferable by the Holder in person or the Holder's attorney duly authorized in writing at the office of the Bond Registrar upon presentation and surrender hereof to the Bond Registrar, all subject to the terms and conditions provided in the Resolution and to reasonable regulations of the Issuer contained in any agreement with the Bond Registrar. Thereupon the Issuer shall execute and the Bond Registrar shall authenticate and deliver, in exchange for this Bond, one or more new fully registered Bonds in the name of the transferee (but not registered in blank or to "bearer" or similar designation), of an Authorized Denomination or Denominations, in aggregate principal amount equal to the principal amount of this Bond, of the same maturity and bearing interest at the same rate. Fees upon Transfer or Loss. The Bond Registrar may require payment of a sum sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge payable in connection with the transfer or exchange of this Bond and any legal or unusual costs regarding transfers and lost Bonds. Treatment of Registered Owners. The Issuer and Bond Registrar may treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the owner hereof for the purpose of receiving payment as herein provided (except as otherwise provided herein with respect to the Record Date) and for all other purposes, whether or not this Bond shall be overdue, and neither the Issuer nor the Bond Registrar shall be affected by notice to the contrary. Authentication. This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security unless the Certificate of Authentication hereon shall have been executed by the Bond Registrar. Qualified Tax-Exempt Obligation. This Bond has been designated by the Issuer as a "qualified tax-exempt obligation" for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED AND RECITED that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to happen and to be performed, precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond, have been done, have happened and have been performed, in regular and due form, time and manner as required by law; that the Issuer has covenanted and agreed with the Holders of the Bonds that it will impose and collect charges for the service, use and availability of its municipal water, sanitary sewer and stormwater utility systems (collectively, the "System") at the times and in amounts necessary to produce net revenues, together with other sums pledged to the payment of the Utility Revenue Portion of the Bonds, as defined in the Resolution, adequate to pay all principal and interest when due on the Utility Revenue Portion of the Bonds; and that the Issuer will levy a direct, annual, irrepealable ad valorem tax upon all of the taxable property of the Issuer, without limitation as to rate or amount, for the years and in amounts sufficient to pay the principal and interest on Utility Revenue Portion of the Bonds as they respectively become due, if the net revenues from the System, and any other sums irrevocably appropriated to the Debt Service Account are insufficient therefor; and that this Bond, together with all other debts of the Issuer outstanding on 171262793v1 12 the date of original issue hereof and the date of its issuance and delivery to the original purchaser, does not exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation of indebtedness. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Cottage Grove, Washington County, Minnesota, by its City Council has caused this Bond to be executed on its behalf by the facsimile signatures of its Mayor and its City Clerk, the corporate seal of the Issuer having been intentionally omitted as permitted by law. Date of Registration: BOND REGISTRAR'S CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This Bond is one of the Bonds described in the Resolution mentioned within. BOND TRUST SERVICES CORPORATION Roseville, Minnesota, Bond Registrar By: Authorized Signature Registrable by: BOND TRUST SERVICES CORPORATION Payable at: BOND TRUST SERVICES CORPORATION CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA /s/ Facsimile Mayor /s/ Facsimile City Clerk 171262793v1 13 ABBREVIATIONS The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM - as tenants in common TEN ENT - as tenants by the entireties JT TEN - as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common UTMA - ___________ as custodian for ______________ (Cust) (Minor) under the _____________________ Uniform (State) Transfers to Minors Act Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. ___________________________________________________________ ASSIGNMENT For value received, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto ________________________________________________________________ the within Bond and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint _________________ attorney to transfer the Bond on the books kept for the registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated:_____________________ ______________________________ Notice: The assignor's signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration or any change whatever. Signature Guaranteed: ___________________________ Signature(s) must be guaranteed by a national bank or trust company or by a brokerage firm having a membership in one of the major stock exchanges or any other "Eligible Guarantor Institution" as defined in 17 CFR 240.17 Ad-15(a)(2). The Bond Registrar will not affect transfer of this Bond unless the information concerning the transferee requested below is provided. Name and Address: ________________________________________ ________________________________________ ________________________________________ (Include information for all joint owners if the Bond is held by joint account.) 171262793v1 14 8. Execution. The Bonds shall be in typewritten form, shall be executed on behalf of the City by the signatures of its Mayor and City Clerk and be sealed with the seal of the City; provided, as permitted by law, both signatures may be photocopied facsimiles and the corporate seal has been omitted. In the event of disability or resignation or other absence of either officer, the Bonds may be signed by the manual or facsimile signature of the officer who may act on behalf of the absent or disabled officer. In case either officer whose signature or facsimile of whose signature shall appear on the Bonds shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of the Bonds, the signature or facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if the officer had remained in office until delivery. 9. Authentication. No Bond shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security or benefit under this resolution unless a Certificate of Authentication on such Bond, substantially in the form hereinabove set forth, shall have been duly executed by an authorized representative of the Bond Registrar. Certificates of Authentication on different Bonds need not be signed by the same person. The Bond Registrar shall authenticate the signatures of officers of the City on each Bond by execution of the Certificate of Authentication on the Bond and by inserting as the date of registration in the space provided the date on which the Bond is authenticated, except that for purposes of delivering the original Bonds to the Purchaser, the Bond Registrar shall insert as a date of registration the date of original issue of March 25, 2025. The Certificate of Authentication so executed on each Bond shall be conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and delivered under this resolution. 10. Registration; Transfer; Exchange. The City will cause to be kept at the principal office of the Bond Registrar a bond register in which, subject to such reasonable regulations as the Bond Registrar may prescribe, the Bond Registrar shall provide for the registration of Bonds and the registration of transfers of Bonds entitled to be registered or transferred as herein provided. Upon surrender for transfer of any Bond at the principal office of the Bond Registrar, the City shall execute (if necessary), and the Bond Registrar shall authenticate, insert the date of registration (as provided in paragraph 9) of, and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more new Bonds of any Authorized Denomination or Denominations of a like aggregate principal amount, having the same stated maturity and interest rate, as requested by the transferor; provided, however, that no Bond may be registered in blank or in the name of "bearer" or similar designation. At the option of the Holder, Bonds may be exchanged for Bonds of any Authorized Denomination or Denominations of a like aggregate principal amount and stated maturity, upon surrender of the Bonds to be exchanged at the principal office of the Bond Registrar. Whenever any Bonds are so surrendered for exchange, the City shall execute (if necessary), and the Bond Registrar shall authenticate, insert the date of registration of, and deliver the Bonds which the Holder making the exchange is entitled to receive. All Bonds surrendered upon any exchange or transfer provided for in this resolution shall be promptly canceled by the Bond Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the City. 171262793v1 15 All Bonds delivered in exchange for or upon transfer of Bonds shall be valid general obligations of the City evidencing the same debt, and entitled to the same benefits under this resolution, as the Bonds surrendered for such exchange or transfer. Every Bond presented or surrendered for transfer or exchange shall be duly endorsed or be accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form satisfactory to the Bond Registrar, duly executed by the Holder thereof or his, her or its attorney duly authorized in writing. The Bond Registrar may require payment of a sum sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge payable in connection with the transfer or exchange of any Bond and any legal or unusual costs regarding transfers and lost Bonds. Transfers shall also be subject to reasonable regulations of the City contained in any agreement with the Bond Registrar, including regulations which permit the Bond Registrar to close its transfer books between record dates and payment dates. The Finance Director is hereby authorized to negotiate and execute the terms of said agreement. 11. Rights Upon Transfer or Exchange. Each Bond delivered upon transfer of or in exchange for or in lieu of any other Bond shall carry all the rights to interest accrued and unpaid, and to accrue, which were carried by such other Bond. 12. Interest Payment; Record Date. Interest on any Bond shall be paid on each Interest Payment Date by check or draft mailed to the person in whose name the Bond is registered (the "Holder") on the registration books of the City maintained by the Bond Registrar and at the address appearing thereon at the close of business on the fifteenth day of the calendar month next preceding such Interest Payment Date (the "Regular Record Date"). Any such interest not so timely paid shall cease to be payable to the person who is the Holder thereof as of the Regular Record Date, and shall be payable to the person who is the Holder thereof at the close of business on a date (the "Special Record Date") fixed by the Bond Registrar whenever money becomes available for payment of the defaulted interest. Notice of the Special Record Date shall be given by the Bond Registrar to the Holders not less than ten days prior to the Special Record Date. 13. Treatment of Registered Owner. The City and Bond Registrar may treat the person in whose name any Bond is registered as the owner of such Bond for the purpose of receiving payment of principal of and premium, if any, and interest (subject to the payment provisions in paragraph 12) on, such Bond and for all other purposes whatsoever whether or not such Bond shall be overdue, and neither the City nor the Bond Registrar shall be affected by notice to the contrary. 14. Delivery; Application of Proceeds. The Bonds when so prepared and executed shall be delivered by the Finance Director to the Purchaser upon receipt of the purchase price, and the Purchaser shall not be obliged to see to the proper application thereof. 15. Fund and Accounts. There is hereby established a special fund to be designated "General Obligation Bonds, Series 2025A Fund" (the "Fund") to be administered and maintained by the Finance Director as a bookkeeping account separate and apart from all other funds maintained in the official financial records of the City. The Fund shall be maintained in the 171262793v1 16 manner herein specified until all of the Bonds and the interest thereon have been fully paid. The Operation and Maintenance Account heretofore established by the City for the Water System shall continue to be maintained in the manner heretofore and herein provided by the City. The Operation and Maintenance Account heretofore established by the City for the Sanitary System shall continue to be maintained in the manner heretofore and herein provided by the City. The Operation and Maintenance Account heretofore established by the City for the Stormwater System shall continue to be maintained in the manner heretofore and herein provided by the City. (The Operation and Maintenance Account for the Water System, the Operation and Maintenance Account for the Sanitary Sewer System and the Operation and Maintenance Account for the Stormwater System are referred to collectively herein as the "Operation and Maintenance Accounts".) All moneys remaining after paying or providing for the items set forth in the resolution(s) establishing the Operation and Maintenance Accounts shall constitute or are referred to as "net revenues" until the Utility Revenue Portion of the Bonds have been paid. In such records there shall be established accounts of the Fund for the purposes and in the amounts as follows: (a) Capital Account. To the Capital Account there shall be credited the proceeds of the sale of the Bonds, less capitalized interest, plus any special assessments levied with respect to the Improvements and collected prior to completion of the Improvements and payment of the costs thereof. From the Capital Account there shall be paid all costs and expenses of making the Project, including the cost of any construction contracts heretofore let and all other costs incurred and to be incurred of the kind authorized in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.65; and the moneys in the Capital Account shall be used for no other purpose except as otherwise provided by law; provided that the proceeds of the Bonds may also be used to the extent necessary to pay interest on the Bonds due prior to the anticipated date of commencement of the receipt of the collection of taxes or special assessments herein levied or covenanted to be levied; and provided further that if upon completion of the Project, there shall remain any unexpended balance in the Capital Account, the balance (other than any special assessments) may be transferred to the Debt Service Account provided that any funds attributable to the Improvement Portion of the Bonds may be transferred to the fund of any other improvement instituted pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and provided further that any special assessments credited to the Capital Account shall only be applied towards payment of the costs of the Improvements upon adoption of a resolution by the City Council determining that the application of the special assessments for such purpose will not cause the City to no longer be in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, Subdivision 1. (b) Debt Service Account. There shall be maintained separate subaccounts in the Debt Service Account to be designated the " Equipment Debt Service Subaccount", the "Improvement Project Debt Service Subaccount", the "Utility Improvements Project Debt Service Subaccount" and the "Tax Abatement Project Debt Service Subaccount." There are hereby irrevocably appropriated and pledged to, and there shall be credited to the separate subaccounts of the Debt Service Account: (i) Equipment Debt Service Subaccount. To the Equipment Debt Service Subaccount there shall be credited: (A) capitalized interest in the amount of $______________ (together with interest earnings thereon and subject to such other adjustments as are appropriate) to provide sufficient funds to pay interest due on the 171262793v1 17 Equipment Portion of the Bonds on or before February 1, 2026; (B) all collections of taxes herein or hereinafter levied for the payment of the Equipment Portion of the Bonds and interest thereon; (C) a pro rata share of all funds remaining in the Capital Account after completion of the Project and payment of the costs thereof; (D) all investment earnings on funds held in the Equipment Debt Service Subaccount; and (E) any and all other moneys which are properly available and are appropriated by the governing body of the City to the Equipment Debt Service Subaccount. The Equipment Debt Service Subaccount shall be used solely to pay the principal and interest on the Equipment Portion of the Bonds and any other general obligation bonds of the City hereafter issued by the City and made payable from said subaccount as provided by law. (ii) Improvement Project Debt Service Subaccount. To the Improvement Project Debt Service Subaccount there shall be credited: (A) capitalized interest in the amount of $______________ (together with interest earnings thereon and subject to such other adjustments as are appropriate) to provide sufficient funds to pay interest due on the Improvement Portion of the Bonds on or before February 1, 2026; (B) all collections of special assessments herein covenanted to be levied with respect to the Improvements and either initially credited to the Capital Account and not already spent as permitted above and required to pay any principal and interest due on the Improvement Portion of the Bonds or collected subsequent to the completion of the Improvements and payment of the costs thereof; (C) all collections of taxes herein or hereinafter levied for the payment of the Improvement Portion of the Bonds and interest thereon; (D) a pro rata share of all funds remaining in the Capital Account after completion of the Project and payment of the costs thereof; (E) all investment earnings on funds held in the Improvement Project Debt Service Subaccount; and (F) any and all other moneys which are properly available and are appropriated by the governing body of the City to the Improvement Project Debt Service Subaccount. The amount of any surplus remaining in the Improvement Debt Service Subaccount when the Improvement Portion of the Bonds and interest thereon are paid shall be used consistent with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, Subdivision 4.) The Improvement Project Debt Service Subaccount shall be used solely to pay the principal and interest on the Improvement Portion of the Bonds and any other general obligation bonds of the City hereafter issued by the City and made payable from said subaccount as provided by law. (iii) Utility Improvements Project Debt Service Subaccount. To the Utility Improvements Project Debt Service Subaccount there shall be credited: (A) the net revenues of the System not otherwise pledged and applied to the payment of other obligations of the City, in an amount, together with other funds which may herein or hereafter from time to time be irrevocably appropriated to the Utility Improvements Project Debt Service Subaccount, sufficient to meet the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61 for the payment of the principal and interest of the Utility Revenue Portion of the Bonds; (B) all collections of taxes which may hereafter be levied in the event that the net revenues of the System and other funds herein pledged to the payment of the principal and interest on the Utility Revenue Portion of the Bonds are insufficient therefor; (C) a pro rata share of all funds remaining in the Capital Account after completion of the Project and payment of the costs thereof; (D) all investment earnings on funds held in the Utility Improvements Project Debt Service Subaccount; and 171262793v1 18 (E) any and all other moneys which are properly available and are appropriated by the governing body of the City to the Utility Improvements Project Debt Service Subaccount. The Utility Improvements Project Debt Service Subaccount shall be used solely to pay the principal and interest on the Utility Revenue Portion of the Bonds and any other general obligation bonds of the City hereafter issued by the City and made payable from said subaccount as provided by law. (iv) Tax Abatement Project Debt Service Subaccount. To the Tax Abatement Project Debt Service Subaccount there shall be credited: (1) Tax Abatements; (2) all collections of taxes herein and hereafter levied (the "Taxes") for the payment of the Tax Abatement Portion of the Bonds; (3) available funds of the City in the amount of $_________ which is sufficient to pay interest due on the Bonds on or before February 1, 2026; (4) a pro rata share of all funds remaining in the Construction Account after completion of the Tax Abatement Project and payment of the costs thereof; (5) all investment earnings on funds held in the Tax Abatement Project Debt Service Subaccount; and (6) any and all other moneys which are properly available and are appropriated by the governing body of the City to the Tax Abatement Debt Service Subaccount. The amount of any surplus remaining in the Tax Abatement Project Debt Service Subaccount when the Tax Abatement Portion of the Bonds and interest thereon are paid shall be used consistent with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, Subdivision 4. The Tax Abatement Debt Service Subaccount shall be used solely to pay the principal and interest on the Tax Abatement Portion of the Bonds. No portion of the proceeds of the Bonds shall be used directly or indirectly to acquire higher yielding investments or to replace funds which were used directly or indirectly to acquire higher yielding investments, except (1) for a reasonable temporary period until such proceeds are needed for the purpose for which the Bonds were issued and (2) in addition to the above in an amount not greater than the lesser of five percent of the proceeds of the Bonds or $100,000. To this effect, any proceeds of the Bonds and any sums from time to time held in the Capital Account, Operation and Maintenance Accounts or Debt Service Account (or any other City account which will be used to pay principal or interest to become due on the bonds payable therefrom) in excess of amounts which under then applicable federal arbitrage regulations may be invested without regard to yield shall not be invested at a yield in excess of the applicable yield restrictions imposed by said arbitrage regulations on such investments after taking into account any applicable "temporary periods" or "minor portion" made available under the federal arbitrage regulations. Money in the Fund shall not be invested in obligations or deposits issued by, guaranteed by or insured by the United States or any agency or instrumentality thereof if and to the extent that such investment would cause the Bonds to be "federally guaranteed" within the meaning of Section 149(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). 16. Covenants Relating to the Equipment Portion of the Bonds. (a) Tax Levy. To provide moneys for payment of the principal and interest on the Equipment Portion of the Bonds there is hereby levied upon all of the taxable property in the City a direct annual ad valorem tax which shall be spread upon the tax rolls and collected with and as part of other general property taxes in the City for the years and in the amounts as follows: 171262793v1 19 Year of Tax Levy Year of Tax Collection Amount See Attached Schedule in Exhibit B (b) Coverage Test. The tax levies are such that if collected in full they, together with other revenues herein pledged for the payment of the Equipment Portion of the Bonds, will produce at least five percent in excess of the amount needed to meet when due the principal and interest payments on the Equipment Portion of the Bonds. The tax levies shall be irrepealable so long as any of the Equipment Portion of the Bonds are outstanding and unpaid, provided that the City reserves the right and power to reduce the levies in the manner and to the extent permitted by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, Subdivision 3. 17. Covenants Relating to the Improvement Portion of the Bonds. (a) Special Assessments. It is hereby determined that no less than twenty percent of the cost to the City of each Improvement financed hereunder within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.58, Subdivision 1(3), shall be paid by special assessments to be levied against every assessable lot, piece and parcel of land benefited by any of the Improvements. The City hereby covenants and agrees that it will let all construction contracts not heretofore let within one year after ordering each Improvement financed hereunder unless the resolution ordering the Improvement specifies a different time limit for the letting of construction contracts. The City hereby further covenants and agrees that it will do and perform as soon as they may be done all acts and things necessary for the final and valid levy of such special assessments, and in the event that any such special assessment be at any time held invalid with respect to any lot, piece or parcel of land due to any error, defect, or irregularity in any action or proceedings taken or to be taken by the City or the City Council or any of the City officers or employees, either in the making of the special assessments or in the performance of any condition precedent thereto, the City and the City Council will forthwith do all further acts and take all further proceedings as may be required by law to make the special assessments a valid and binding lien upon such property. The special assessments have heretofore been authorized. Subject to such adjustments as are required by conditions in existence at the time the assessments are levied, it is hereby determined that the assessments shall be payable in equal, consecutive, annual installments, including both principal and interest, with interest at a rate per annum set forth below: Improvement Designation Levy Years Collection Years Amount See Attached Schedule in Exhibit B At the time the assessments are in fact levied the City Council shall, based on the then- current estimated collections of the assessments, make any adjustments in any ad valorem taxes required to be levied in order to assure that the City continues to be in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, Subdivision 1. (b) Tax Levy. To provide moneys for payment of the principal and interest on the Improvement Portion of the Bonds there is hereby levied upon all of the taxable property in the 171262793v1 20 City a direct annual ad valorem tax which shall be spread upon the tax rolls and collected with and as part of other general property taxes in the City for the years and in the amounts as follows: Levy Years Collection Years Amount See Attached Schedule in Exhibit B (c) Coverage Test. The tax levies are such that if collected in full they, together with estimated collections of special assessments and other revenues herein pledged for the payment of the Improvement Portion of the Bonds, will produce at least five (5%) percent in excess of the amount needed to meet when due the principal and interest payments on the Improvement Portion of the Bonds. The tax levies shall be irrepealable so long as any of the Improvement Portion of the Bonds are outstanding and unpaid, provided that the City reserves the right and power to reduce the levies in the manner and to the extent permitted by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, Subdivision 3. 18. Covenants Relating to the Utility Revenue Portion of the Bonds. (a) Sufficiency of Net Revenues; Coverage Test. It is hereby found, determined and declared that the net revenues of the System are sufficient in amount to pay when due the principal of and interest on the Utility Revenue Portion of the Bonds and the Outstanding Utility Bonds and a sum at least five percent in excess thereof. The net revenues of the System are hereby pledged on a parity with the Outstanding Utility Bonds for the payment of the Utility Revenue Portion of the Bonds and shall be applied for that purpose, but solely to the extent required to meet the principal and interest requirements of the Bonds as the same become due. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to preclude the City from making further pledges and appropriations of the net revenues of the System for the payment of other or additional obligations of the City, provided that it has first been determined by the City Council that the estimated net revenues of the System will be sufficient in addition to all other sources, for the payment of the Utility Revenue Portion of the Bonds and such additional obligations and any such pledge and appropriation of the net revenues may be made superior or subordinate to, or on a parity with the pledge and appropriation herein. (b) Excess Net Revenues. Net revenues in excess of those required for the foregoing may be used for any proper purpose. (c) Covenant to Maintain Rates and Charges. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 444.075, the City hereby covenants and agrees with the Holders of the Bonds that it will impose and collect charges for the service, use, availability and connection to the System at the times and in the amounts required to produce net revenues adequate to pay all principal and interest when due on the Utility Revenue Portion of the Bonds. Minnesota Statutes, Section 444.075, Subdivision 2, provides as follows: "Real estate tax revenues should be used only, and then on a temporary basis, to pay general or special obligations when the other revenues are insufficient to meet the obligations." 171262793v1 21 19. Covenants Relating to the Tax Abatement Portion of the Bonds. (a) Tax Abatements; Use of Tax Abatements. The City Council has adopted the Tax Abatement Resolution and has thereby approved the Tax Abatements, including the pledge thereof to the payment of the Tax Abatement Portion of the Bonds. The City Council hereby confirms the Tax Abatement Resolution, which is hereby incorporated as though set forth herein. (b) Tax Levy. To provide moneys for payment of principal and the interest on the Tax Abatement Portion of the Bonds, there is hereby levied upon all of the taxable property in the City a direct annual ad valorem tax which shall be spread upon the tax rolls and collected with and as part of other general property taxes in the City for the years and in the amounts as follows: Levy Years Collection Years Amount See Attached Schedule in Exhibit B (c) Coverage Test. The Taxes are such that if collected in full they, together with estimated collections of Tax Abatements, will produce at least five percent in excess of the amount needed to meet when due the principal and interest payments on the Tax Abatement Portion of the Bonds. The Taxes shall be irrepealable so long as any of the Tax Abatement Portion of the Bonds are outstanding and unpaid, provided that the City reserves the right and power to reduce the levies in the manner and to the extent permitted by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, Subdivision 3. 20. Continuing Disclosure. The City is the sole obligated person with respect to the Bonds. The City hereby agrees, in accordance with the provisions of Rule 15c2-12 (the "Rule"), promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and a Continuing Disclosure Undertaking (the "Undertaking") hereinafter described to: (a) Provide or cause to be provided to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (the "MSRB") by filing at www.emma.msrb.org in accordance with the Rule, certain annual financial information and operating data in accordance with the Undertaking. The City reserves the right to modify from time to time the terms of the Undertaking as provided therein. (b) Provide or cause to be provided to the MSRB notice of the occurrence of certain events with respect to the Bonds in not more than ten (10) business days after the occurrence of the event, in accordance with the Undertaking. (c) Provide or cause to be provided to the MSRB notice of a failure by the City to provide the annual financial information with respect to the City described in the Undertaking, in not more than ten (10) business days following such occurrence. (d) The City agrees that its covenants pursuant to the Rule set forth in this paragraph and in the Undertaking is intended to be for the benefit of the Holders of the Bonds and shall be enforceable on behalf of such Holders; provided that the right to enforce the provisions of these 171262793v1 22 covenants shall be limited to a right to obtain specific enforcement of the City's obligations under the covenants. The Mayor and City Clerk of the City, or any other officer of the City authorized to act in their place (the "Officers") are hereby authorized and directed to execute on behalf of the City the Undertaking in substantially the form presented to the City Council subject to such modifications thereof or additions thereto as are (i) consistent with the requirements under the Rule, (ii) required by the Purchaser of the Bonds, and (iii) acceptable to the Officers. 21. Defeasance. When all Bonds have been discharged as provided in this paragraph, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this resolution to the registered holders of the Bonds shall, to the extent permitted by law, cease. The City may discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds which are due on any date by irrevocably depositing with the Bond Registrar on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full; or if any Bond should not be paid when due, it may nevertheless be discharged by depositing with the Bond Registrar a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued to the date of such deposit. The City may also discharge its obligations with respect to any prepayable Bonds called for redemption on any date when they are prepayable according to their terms, by depositing with the Bond Registrar on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full, provided that notice of redemption thereof has been duly given. The City may also at any time discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds, subject to the provisions of law now or hereafter authorizing and regulating such action, by depositing irrevocably in escrow, with a suitable banking institution qualified by law as an escrow agent for this purpose, cash or securities described in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.67, Subdivision 8, bearing interest payable at such times and at such rates and maturing on such dates as shall be required, without regard to sale and/or reinvestment, to pay all amounts to become due thereon to maturity or, if notice of redemption as herein required has been duly provided for, to such earlier redemption date. 22. Compliance With Reimbursement Bond Regulations. The provisions of this paragraph are intended to establish and provide for the City's compliance with United States Treasury Regulations Section 1.150-2 (the "Reimbursement Regulations") applicable to the "reimbursement proceeds" of the Bonds, being those portions thereof which will be used by the City to reimburse itself for any expenditure which the City paid or will have paid prior to the Closing Date (a "Reimbursement Expenditure"). The City hereby certifies and/or covenants as follows: (a) Not later than sixty days after the date of payment of a Reimbursement Expenditure, the City (or person designated to do so on behalf of the City) has made or will have made a written declaration of the City's official intent (a "Declaration") which effectively (i) states the City's reasonable expectation to reimburse itself for the payment of the Reimbursement Expenditure out of the proceeds of a subsequent borrowing; (ii) gives a general and functional description of the property, project or program to which the Declaration relates and for which the Reimbursement Expenditure is paid, or identifies a specific fund or account of the City and the general functional purpose thereof from which the Reimbursement Expenditure was to be paid (collectively the "Program"); and (iii) states the maximum principal amount of debt expected to 171262793v1 23 be issued by the City for the purpose of financing the Program; provided, however, that no such Declaration shall necessarily have been made with respect to: (i) "preliminary expenditures" for the Program, defined in the Reimbursement Regulations to include engineering or architectural, surveying and soil testing expenses and similar prefatory costs, which in the aggregate do not exceed twenty percent of the "issue price" of the Bonds, and (ii) a de minimis amount of Reimbursement Expenditures not in excess of the lesser of $100,000 or five percent of the proceeds of the Bonds. (b) Each Reimbursement Expenditure is a capital expenditure or a cost of issuance of the Bonds or any of the other types of expenditures described in Section 1.150-2(d)(3) of the Reimbursement Regulations. (c) The "reimbursement allocation" described in the Reimbursement Regulations for each Reimbursement Expenditure shall and will be made forthwith following (but not prior to) the issuance of the Bonds, and not later than 18 months after the later of (i) the date of the payment of the Reimbursement Expenditure, or (ii) the date on which the Program to which the Reimbursement Expenditure relates is first placed in service, but in no event more than three years after the date of payment of the Reimbursement Expenditure. (d) Each such reimbursement allocation will be made in a writing that evidences the City's use of Bond proceeds to reimburse the Reimbursement Expenditure and, if made within 30 days after the Bonds are issued, shall be treated as made on the day the Bonds are issued. Provided, however, that the City may take action contrary to any of the foregoing covenants in this paragraph upon receipt of an opinion of its Bond Counsel for the Bonds stating in effect that such action will not impair the tax-exempt status of the Bonds. 23. General Obligation Pledge. For the prompt and full payment of the principal and interest on the Bonds, as the same respectively become due, the full faith, credit and taxing powers of the City shall be and are hereby irrevocably pledged. If the net revenues of the System appropriated and pledged to the payment of principal and interest on the Utility Revenue Portion of the Bonds, together with other funds irrevocably appropriated to the Utility Improvements Project Debt Service Subaccount herein established, shall at any time be insufficient to pay such principal and interest when due, the City covenants and agrees to levy, without limitation as to rate or amount an ad valorem tax upon all taxable property in the City sufficient to pay such principal and interest as it becomes due. If the balance in the Debt Service Account is ever insufficient to pay all principal and interest then due on the Bonds and any other bonds payable therefrom, the deficiency shall be promptly paid out of any other funds of the City which are available for such purpose, and such other funds may be reimbursed with or without interest from the Debt Service Account when a sufficient balance is available therein. 24. Certificate of Registration and Tax Levy. A certified copy of this resolution is hereby directed to be filed with the with the Auditor/Treasurer of Washington County, Minnesota, together with such other information as the Auditor/Treasurer shall require, and there shall be obtained from the Auditor/Treasurer a certificate that the Bonds have been entered in the Auditor/Treasurer's Bond Register and that the tax levy required by law has been made. 171262793v1 24 25. Records and Certificates. The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Purchaser, and to the attorneys approving the legality of the issuance of the Bonds, certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City relating to the Bonds and to the financial condition and affairs of the City, and such other affidavits, certificates and information as are required to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of the Bonds as the same appear from the books and records under their custody and control or as otherwise known to them, and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall be deemed representations of the City as to the facts recited therein. 26. Negative Covenant as to Use of Bond Proceeds and Project. The City hereby covenants not to use the proceeds of the Bonds or to use the Project, or to cause or permit them to be used, or to enter into any deferred payment arrangements for the cost of the Project, in such a manner as to cause the Bonds to be "private activity bonds" within the meaning of Sections 103 and 141 through 150 of the Code. 27. Tax-Exempt Status of the Bonds; Rebate. (a) Allocation to the Improvement Portion of the Bonds, the Utility Revenue Portion of the Bonds and the Tax Abatement Portion of the Bonds. The City shall comply with requirements necessary under the Code to establish and maintain the exclusion from gross income under Section 103 of the Code of the interest on the Improvement Portion of the Bonds, the Utility Revenue Portion of the Bonds and the Tax Abatement Portion of the Bonds, including without limitation (i) requirements relating to temporary periods for investments, (ii) limitations on amounts invested at a yield greater than the yield on the Improvement Portion of the Bonds, the Utility Revenue Portion of the Bonds and the Tax Abatement Portion of the Bonds, and (iii) the rebate of excess investment earnings to the United States. The City expects to satisfy the 24- month exemption for gross proceeds of the Improvement Portion of the Bonds, the Utility Revenue Portion of the Bonds and the Tax Abatement Portion of the Bonds as provided in Section 1.148-7(e) of the Regulations. The Mayor and/or City Clerk and/or Finance Director are hereby authorized and directed to make such elections as to arbitrage and rebate matters relating to the Improvement Portion of the Bonds, the Utility Revenue Portion of the Bonds and the Tax Abatement Portion of the Bonds as they deem necessary, appropriate or desirable in connection with the Improvement Portion of the Bonds, the Utility Revenue Portion of the Bonds and the Tax Abatement Portion of the Bonds, and all such elections shall be, and shall be deemed and treated as, elections of the City. (b) Allocation to the Equipment Portion of the Bonds. The City shall comply with requirements necessary under the Code to establish and maintain the exclusion from gross income under Section 103 of the Code of the interest on the Equipment Portion of the Bonds, including without limitation (a) requirements relating to temporary periods for investments, (b) limitations on amounts invested at a yield greater than the yield on the Equipment Portion of the Bonds, and (c) the rebate of excess investment earnings to the United States. The City expects to satisfy the 18-month expenditure exemption for gross proceeds of the Equipment Portion of the Bonds as provided in Section 1.148-7(d) of the Regulations. The Mayor and/or City Clerk and/or Finance Director are hereby authorized and directed to make such elections as to arbitrage and rebate matters relating to the Bonds as they deem necessary, appropriate or desirable in 171262793v1 25 connection with the Bonds, and all such elections shall be, and shall be deemed and treated as, elections of the City. 28. Designation of Qualified Tax-Exempt Obligations. In order to qualify the Bonds as "qualified tax-exempt obligations" within the meaning of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code, the City hereby makes the following factual statements and representations: (a) the Bonds are issued after August 7, 1986; (b) the Bonds are not "private activity bonds" as defined in Section 141 of the Code; (c) the City hereby designates the Bonds as "qualified tax-exempt obligations" for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code; (d) the reasonably anticipated amount of tax-exempt obligations (other than private activity bonds, treating qualified 501(c)(3) bonds as not being private activity bonds) which will be issued by the City (and all entities treated as one issuer with the City, and all subordinate entities whose obligations are treated as issued by the City) during this calendar year 2025 will not exceed $10,000,000; and (e) not more than $10,000,000 of obligations issued by the City during this calendar year 2025 have been designated for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code; and (f) the aggregate face amount of the Bonds does not exceed $10,000,000. The City shall use its best efforts to comply with any federal procedural requirements which may apply in order to effectuate the designation made by this paragraph. 29. Official Statement. The Official Statement relating to the Bonds prepared and distributed by Ehlers is hereby approved and the officers of the City are authorized in connection with the delivery of the Bonds to sign such certificates as may be necessary with respect to the completeness and accuracy of the Official Statement. 30. Payment of Issuance Expenses. The City authorizes the Purchaser to forward the amount of Bond proceeds allocable to the payment of issuance expenses to Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, San Francisco, California, on the closing date for further distribution as directed by Ehlers. 31. Severability. If any section, paragraph or provision of this resolution shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, the invalidity or unenforceability of such section, paragraph or provision shall not affect any of the remaining provisions of this resolution 32. Headings. Headings in this resolution are included for convenience of reference only and are not a part hereof, and shall not limit or define the meaning of any provision hereof. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member _____________ and, after a full discussion thereof and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: 171262793v1 26 and the following voted against the same: Whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 171262793v1 27 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF WASHINGTON CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes with the original thereof on file in my office, and that the same is a full, true and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City Council, duly called and held on the date therein indicated, insofar as such minutes relate to authorizing the issuance and awarding the sale of $10,000,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2025A. WITNESS my hand on March 5, 2025. _______________________________________ City Clerk 171262793v1 A-1 EXHIBIT A PROPOSALS [To be supplied by Ehlers & Associates, Inc.] 171262793v1 B-1 EXHIBIT B SCHEDULES [To be supplied by Ehlers & Associates, Inc.] 1 City Council Action Request 13.A. Meeting Date 3/5/2025 Department Communications Agenda Category Presentation Title Polco Community Survey Workshop Staff Recommendation Receive presentation and provide feedback regarding the POLCO survey. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. Polco Council Workshop_3-5-25 2. The NCS Instrument Cottage Grove MN 2025_final draft 2-28-25 To:Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From:Phil Jents, Communications Manager Date:March 5, 2025 Subject:Polco National Community Survey Introduction and Survey Overview Polco is a civic engagement platform used by local governments across the country to gather actionable feedback from residents. The Polco National Community Survey (NCS) is a trusted tool that provides municipalities with high-quality, statistically reliable data on how residents view their community, local government, and key services. By participating in this survey, the City of Cottage Grove will have an opportunity to gather insightful, evidence-based input directly from the people who matter most—the residents. This feedback will be invaluable as the city works to assess needs, prioritize services, and guide future policy decisions. The Polco National Community Survey is designed to measure community satisfaction, identify strengths and areas for improvement, and provide a snapshot of residents' perspectives on a wide range of issues. It includes questions on a variety of topics, including public safety, housing, transportation, amenities, and the overall quality of life in Cottage Grove. A community survey was an item identified as a priority in the City’s 2025 strategic planning process. This survey is designed to ensure that the city is effectively serving the needs of its residents and is positioned to make informed, data-driven decisions moving forward. Custom Questions The survey includes statistically relevant questions that both gain feedback about city services and allow the city to compare ourselves to other communities. In addition, the city can include approximately one half-page of custom questions based on the city’s needs. Polco offers a library of questions for the city to consider that may serve as a helpful launching point for discussion around what custom questions to include. After reviewing the overall survey, and custom question options, with department directors and city staff, the following questions have been proposed for consideration. Many of the questions focus on the Council’s desire to gain more feedback on taxes and levels of service. It is important to note, that only a select number of custom questions will be included in the final survey. Custom questions to consider: •If the City of Cottage had to reduce spending due to reduced revenues, how much would you support or oppose service reductions in each of the following areas? Strongly support Somewhat support Somewhat oppose Strongly oppose Don’t know Streets (maintenance and street light signals) Police services Parks and recreation (parks, playgrounds, trails, fields) Fire and EMS Snow plowing / removal •Tell us how much of a priority, if at all, the City of Cottage Grove should place on each of the following aspects of the community in the next XX years. High priority Medium priority Low priority Not a priority Don’t know Transportation (e.g. safe/well- maintained multi- modal transportation systems) Utilities (e.g. safe/reliable drinking water, sanitary sewer) Police (e.g. community safety and compliance with Municipal Code/State Law) Parks (e.g. well- maintained parks/landscape areas, sports facilities) Open Space & Trails (e.g. preserving native plants, wildlife and scenic vistas) Recreation (e.g. high quality, reasonably priced recreation/leisure activities) Fire & EMS Affordable Housing (e.g. senior, income restricted) Economic Prosperity (e.g. promoting a thriving business, retail, and restaurant climate) Administration & Support Services (e.g. effective and efficient governance) Environmental Sustainability (e.g. promoting efficiency, reducing environmental impacts, and improving stormwater systems) •Please select the statement that best describes your opinion. o I am satisfied with the current level of taxes and services. o I am willing to pay more taxes to get more services. o I feel that I pay too much for the services I receive. o I am willing to accept service reductions if it means lower taxes. o My opinion is different from the ones listed above. o I don’t have an opinion / no preference. •How much do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements? Strongly agree Somewhat agree Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree Don’t know The City of Cottage Grove effectively manages taxpayer money The City should raise taxes annually in small increments to cover increased cost of services over time The City should only raise taxes as needed, even if in larger increments, to cover cost of services as they increase The City should reduce public services to avoid future tax increases •How safe do you feel when visiting local parks in our community? o Very safe o Somewhat safe o Neutral o Somewhat unsafe o Very unsafe o I don’t have an opinion / no preference. •How interested are you in having fiber internet available in our community? o Very interested o Interested o Neutral o Not very interested o Not at all interested •Which communications platforms do you prefer to receive updates and information from the City? (Select all that apply) o City website o Cottage Grove Connect emails o Cottage Grove Reports newsletter o Social media (Facebook, X/Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn, etc.) o Community meetings or events •How would you rate the value that local venues – such as River Oaks Golf Course and Event Center, the Cottage Grove Ice Arena, and the HERO Center – bring to our community in terms of recreation, entertainment, and public services? o Excellent value o Good value o Fair value o Poor value o I don’t have an opinion / no preference. •Based on your most recent contact with a member of the Cottage Grove Police Department, please rate each of the following aspects of the last employee with whom you had contact. Excellent Good Fair Poor Not applicable Fairness Knowledge Responsiveness to requests and/or needs Treating all people involved in a respectful manner Timeliness of handling the situation Resolution of concerns Overall impressions of Cottage Grove Police Department staff member •Is there anything you would like to see improved or changed in our community? a. Write your answer here •Thinking of your most RECENT contact with the City of Cottage Grove, how long did it take for someone to respond to your inquiry? a. Immediately / within 24 hours b. 2-3 days c. 4-6 days d. 7 days or longer e. Don’t know/cannot remember f. Didn’t receive a response Survey Timeline The survey will unfold over the following key stages: •Preparing the Survey, Weeks 1-6: Review NCS with Program Manager (PM), mailing materials and survey instrument are finalized, PM generates representative sample of households in the community, and Polco prints materials, prepares mailings, and sets up online survey. •Survey Promotion, leading up to and throughout duration of open survey: The city will promote the survey through social media, the city website, local newsletters, and other communications channels to encourage participation. •Conducting the Survey, Weeks 7-12: Data collection opens, initial postcard sent, open participation survey begins, and data collection closes. •Analysis and reporting, Weeks 13-17: PM conducts survey analysis and prepares report and final report provided. •Next Steps: Following the survey's completion, the results will be used to inform city planning and decision-making. The, Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator will receive a detailed report and be able to discuss the findings in further detail to help prioritize future initiatives and improve city services. Polco Overview In 2019, National Research Center (NRC) joined Polco to set a new standard for survey research. NRC was the leading provider of community surveys for local governments across the country for 25 years, and the merger with Polco combined NRC’s extensive library of professional local government surveys, a database of local government performance, and survey research expertise with Polco’s technical capabilities for enhanced communication and engagement. Polco has received the highest levels of endorsement from the International City/County Managers Association (ICMA), the National League of Cities (NLC), and the Government Financial Officers Association (GFOA). Together, these organizations comprise thousands of city and county managers, council members, elected officials, and government finance professionals. Budget Implications The Polco Confluence, Inc. Subscription and Support Agreement (Total: $29,300) is being partially invoiced upon the initial term start date ($10,000) and the remainder ($19,300) will be invoiced upon delivery of the results of the National Community Survey. This was an approved budget addition for 2025 from the Community and Employee Programs budget in the General Fund. Staff Recommendation Provide direction on final custom questions for the community survey. The National Community Survey™ • © 2001-2025 National Research Center, Inc.The City of Cottage Grove 2025 Community Survey Page 1 of 5 Please complete this survey if you are the adult (age 18 or older) in the household who most recently had a birthday (the year of birth does not matter). Your responses are confidential and no identifying information will be shared. 1. Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Cottage Grove.Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know q1a Cottage Grove as a place to live...........................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q1b Your neighborhood as a place to live...............................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q1c Cottage Grove as a place to raise children......................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q1d Cottage Grove as a place to work.......................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q1e Cottage Grove as a place to visit.........................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q1f Cottage Grove as a place to retire......................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q1g The overall quality of life in Cottage Grove....................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q1h Sense of community.................................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 2. Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Cottage Grove as a whole. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know q2a Overall economic health of Cottage Grove.....................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q2b Overall quality of the transportation system (auto, bicycle, foot, bus) in Cottage Grove..................................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q2c Overall design or layout of Cottage Grove’s residential and commercial areas (e.g., homes, buildings, streets, parks, etc.) ................................................1 2 3 4 5 q2d Overall quality of the utility infrastructure in Cottage Grove................................. (water, sewer, storm water, etc.).................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q2e Overall feeling of safety in Cottage Grove.......................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q2f Overall quality of natural environment in Cottage Grove.......................................1 2 3 4 5 q2g Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities.............................................1 2 3 4 5 q2h Overall health and wellness opportunities in Cottage Grove ................................1 2 3 4 5 q2i Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts......................................1 2 3 4 5 q2j Residents’ connection and engagement with their community...........................1 2 3 4 5 3. Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. Very Somewhat Somewhat Very Don’tlikely likely unlikely unlikely know q3a Recommend living in Cottage Grove to someone who asks............1 2 3 4 5 q3b Remain in Cottage Grove for the next five years..................................1 2 3 4 5 4. Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: Very Somewhat Neither safe Somewhat Very Don’tsafe safe nor unsafe unsafe unsafe know q4a In your neighborhood during the day......................................1 2 3 4 5 6 q4b In Cottage Grove’s commercial areas during the day........1 2 3 4 5 6 q4c From property crime.......................................................................1 2 3 4 5 6 q4d From violent crime...........................................................................1 2 3 4 5 6 q4e From fire, flood, or other natural disaster..............................1 2 3 4 5 6 5. Please rate the job you feel the Cottage Grove community does at each of the following. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know q5a Making all residents feel welcome.....................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q5b Attracting people from diverse backgrounds...............................................................1 2 3 4 5 q5c Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds.......................................1 2 3 4 5 q5d Taking care of vulnerable residents (elderly, disabled, homeless, etc.)............1 2 3 4 5 6. Please rate each of the following in the Cottage Grove community. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know q6a Overall quality of business and service establishments in Cottage Grove.......1 2 3 4 5 q6b Variety of business and service establishments in Cottage Grove......................1 2 3 4 5 q6c Vibrancy of commercial areas.............................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q6d Employment opportunities...................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q6e Shopping opportunities..........................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q6f Cost of living in Cottage Grove............................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q6g Overall image or reputation of Cottage Grove..............................................................1 2 3 4 5 The National Community Survey™ • © 2001-2025 National Research Center, Inc.Page 2 of 5 7. Please also rate each of the following in the Cottage Grove community. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know q7a Traffic flow on major streets................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q7b Ease of public parking.............................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q7c Ease of travel by car in Cottage Grove .............................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q7d Ease of travel by public transportation in Cottage Grove........................................1 2 3 4 5 q7e Ease of travel by bicycle in Cottage Grove......................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q7f Ease of walking in Cottage Grove.......................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q7g Well-planned residential growth.......................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q7h Well-planned commercial growth.....................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q7i Well-designed neighborhoods............................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q7j Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community.............1 2 3 4 5 q7k Public places where people want to spend time.........................................................1 2 3 4 5 q7l Variety of housing options....................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q7m Availability of affordable quality housing......................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q7n Overall quality of new development in Cottage Grove.............................................1 2 3 4 5 q7o Overall appearance of Cottage Grove...............................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q7p Cleanliness of Cottage Grove................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q7q Water resources (lakes, ponds, riverways, etc.) .........................................................1 2 3 4 5 q7r Air quality.....................................................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q7s Availability of paths and walking trails...........................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q7t Fitness opportunities (including exercise classes and paths or trails, etc.)....1 2 3 4 5 q7u Recreational opportunities...................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q7v Availability of affordable quality food..............................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q7w Availability of affordable quality health care................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q7x Availability of preventive health services......................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q7y Availability of affordable quality mental health care................................................1 2 3 4 5 q7z Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities...........................................1 2 3 4 5 q7aa Community support for the arts.........................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q7bb Availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool.............................................1 2 3 4 5 q7cc K-12 education...........................................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q7dd Adult educational opportunities.........................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q7ee Sense of civic/community pride.........................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q7ff Neighborliness of residents in Cottage Grove..............................................................1 2 3 4 5 q7gg Opportunities to participate in social events and activities...................................1 2 3 4 5 q7hh Opportunities to attend special events and festivals.................................................1 2 3 4 5 q7ii Opportunities to volunteer...................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q7jj Opportunities to participate in community matters.................................................1 2 3 4 5 q7kk Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds....................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 8. Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. No Yes q8a Contacted the City of Cottage Grove (in-person, phone, email, or web) for help or information..................1 2 q8b Contacted Cottage Grove elected officials (in-person, phone, email, or web) to express your opinion......1 2 q8c Attended a local public meeting (of local elected officials like City Council or County Commissioners, advisory boards, town halls, etc.) .....................................................................................................1 2 q8d Watched (online or on television) a local public meeting...............................................................................................1 2 q8e Volunteered your time to some group/activity in Cottage Grove................................................................................1 2 q8f Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidate..................................................................................1 2 q8g Voted in your most recent local election.................................................................................................................................1 2 q8h Used bus or other public transportation instead of driving...........................................................................................1 2 q8i Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone...............................................................................1 2 q8j Walked or biked instead of driving ...........................................................................................................................................1 2 The National Community Survey™ • © 2001-2025 National Research Center, Inc.The City of Cottage Grove 2025 Community Survey Page 3 of 5 9. Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Cottage Grove. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know q9a Public information services..............................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q9b Economic development......................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q9c Traffic enforcement.............................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q9d Traffic signal timing.............................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q9e Street repair............................................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q9f Street cleaning........................................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q9g Street lighting.........................................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q9h Snow removal.........................................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q9i Sidewalk maintenance........................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q9j Bus or transit services........................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q9k Land use, planning, and zoning.......................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q9l Code enforcement (weeds, abandoned buildings, etc.) .......................................1 2 3 4 5 q9m Affordable high-speed internet access........................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q9n Garbage collection................................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q9o Drinking water.......................................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q9p Sewer services........................................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q9q Storm water management (storm drainage, etc.) ..................................................1 2 3 4 5 q9r Power (electric and/or gas) utility................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q9s Utility billing............................................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q9t Police services........................................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q9u Crime prevention..................................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q9v Animal control........................................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q9w Ambulance or emergency medical services..............................................................1 2 3 4 5 q9x Fire services............................................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q9y Fire prevention and education........................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q9z Emergency preparedness (services that prepare the community for natural disasters or other emergency situations) ....................................1 2 3 4 5 q9aa Preservation of natural areas (open space, farmlands, and greenbelts)......1 2 3 4 5 q9bb Cottage Grove open space.................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q9cc Recycling...................................................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q9dd Yard waste pick-up...............................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q9ee City parks..................................................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q9ff Recreation programs or classes.....................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q9gg Recreation centers or facilities.......................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q9hh Health services.......................................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q9ii Public library services........................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q9jj Overall customer service by Cottage Grove employees (police, receptionists, planners, etc.) ....................................................................1 2 3 4 5 10. Please rate the following categories of Cottage Grove government performance. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know q10a The value of services for the taxes paid to Cottage Grove...................................1 2 3 4 5 q10b The overall direction that Cottage Grove is taking.................................................1 2 3 4 5 q10c The job Cottage Grove government does at welcoming resident involvement1 2 3 4 5 q10d Overall confidence in Cottage Grove government..................................................1 2 3 4 5 q10e Generally acting in the best interest of the community.......................................1 2 3 4 5 q10f Being honest............................................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q10g Being open and transparent to the public..................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q10h Informing residents about issues facing the community....................................1 2 3 4 5 q10i Treating all residents fairly..............................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 q10j Treating residents with respect.....................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 11. Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know q11a The City of Cottage Grove..................................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 The National Community Survey™ • © 2001-2025 National Research Center, Inc.Page 4 of 5 12. Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Cottage Grove community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years.Very Somewhat Not at allEssential important important important q12a Overall economic health of Cottage Grove.......................................................................1 2 3 4 q12b Overall quality of the transportation system (auto, bicycle, foot, bus) in Cottage Grove....................................................................................................................1 2 3 4 q12c Overall design or layout of Cottage Grove’s residential and commercial areas (e.g., homes, buildings, streets, parks, etc.) ..................................................1 2 3 4 q12d Overall quality of the utility infrastructure in Cottage Grove (water, sewer, storm water, electric/gas, broadband) ........................................1 2 3 4 q12e Overall feeling of safety in Cottage Grove.........................................................................1 2 3 4 q12f Overall quality of natural environment in Cottage Grove.........................................1 2 3 4 q12g Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities...............................................1 2 3 4 q12h Overall health and wellness opportunities in Cottage Grove...................................1 2 3 4 q12i Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts........................................1 2 3 4 q12j Residents’ connection and engagement with their community.............................1 2 3 4 The National Community Survey™ • © 2001-2025 National Research Center, Inc.The City of Cottage Grove 2025 Community Survey Page 5 of 5 Our last questions are about you and your household. Again, all of your responses to this survey are confidential and no identifying information will be shared. D1. In general, how many times do you: Several Once A few times Every Less often Don’t times a day a day a week few weeks or never know d1a Access the internet from your home using a computer, laptop, or tablet computer....................1 2 3 4 5 6 d1b Access the internet from your cell phone.......................1 2 3 4 5 6 d1c Visit social media sites such as Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), Nextdoor, etc. ..........................1 2 3 4 5 6 d1d Use or check email....................................................................1 2 3 4 5 6 d1e Share your opinions online...................................................1 2 3 4 5 6 d1f Shop online..................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 6 D2. Please rate your overall health. 1 Excellent 2 Very good 3 Good 4 Fair 5 Poor D3. What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: 1 Very positive 2 Somewhat positive 3 Neutral 4 Somewhat negative 5 Very negative D4. How many years have you lived in Cottage Grove? 1 Less than 2 years 2 2-5 years 3 6-10 years 4 11-20 years 5 More than 20 years D5. Which best describes the building you live in? 1 Single-family detached home 2 Townhouse or duplex (may share walls but no units above or below you) 3 Condominium or apartment (have units above or below you) 4 Mobile home 5 Other D6. Do you rent or own your home? 1 Rent 2 Own D7. About how much is your monthly housing cost for the place you live (including rent, mortgage payment, property tax, property insurance, and homeowners’ association (HOA) fees)? 1 Less than $300 6 $2,500 to $3,999 2 $300 to $599 7 $4,000 to $6,999 3 $600 to $999 8 $7,000 to $9,999 4 $1,000 to $1,499 9 $10,000 or more 5 $1,500 to $2,499 D8. Do any children 17 or under live in your household? 1 No 2 Yes D9. Are you or any other members of your household aged 65 or older? 1 No 2 Yes D10. How much do you anticipate your household’s total income before taxes will be for the current year? (Please include in your total income money from all sources for all persons living in your household.) 1 Less than $25,000 5 $100,000 to $149,999 2 $25,000 to $49,999 6 $150,000 to $199,999 3 $50,000 to $74,999 7 $200,000 to $299,999 4 $75,000 to $99,999 8 $300,000 or more D11. Are you of Hispanic, Latino/a/x, or Spanish origin? 1 No 2 Yes D12. What is your race? (Mark one or more races to indicate what race you consider yourself to be.) d12a American Indian or Alaskan Native d12b Asian d12c Black or African American d12d Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander d12e White d12f A race not listed D13. In which category is your age? 1 18-24 years 5 55-64 years 2 25-34 years 6 65-74 years 3 35-44 years 7 75 years or older 4 45-54 years D14. What is your gender? 1 Woman 2 Man 3 Identify in another way go to D14a D14a. If you identify in another way, how would you describe your gender? 1 Agender/I don’t identify with any gender 2 Genderqueer/gender fluid 3 Non-binary 4 Transgender man 5 Transgender woman 6 Two-spirit 7 Identify in another way Thank you!Please return the completed survey in the postage-paid envelope to: National Research Center, Inc., PO Box 549, Belle Mead, NJ 08502