Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-08-19 PACKET 12.A.REQUEST OF CITY COUNCIL ACTION COUNCIL AGENDA MEETING ITEM # DATE 08/19/98 �� . PREPARED BY Administration Ryan Schroeder ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT STAFF AU�fHOR �«>����«.>.�.�*.�.������.<.��«.�������<...������ COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST MCES Roadway improvements. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS � MEMOI�ETTER: ❑ RESOLUTION: ❑ ORDINANCE: ❑ ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION: ❑ LEGAL RECOMMENDATION: ❑ OTHER: ADMINISTRATORS COMMENTS T � � I 9 City Administrator Data �«.«..>����.�.���..�..,�����..��«.�.<���..��,�,< COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: ❑ APPROVED ❑ DENIED ❑ OTHER Memo to: Mayor and City Councii From: Ryan R. Schroeder Subj.: MCES Road Improvement Proposal Date: August 13, 1998 On July 31, 1998 Council discussed the draft proposai from the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) regarding road improvements proposed by MCES as a result of the upcoming Waste Treatment Plant expansion. On August 4, 1998 staff penned the attached correspondence to the MCES as a result of the July 31 discussion. On August 5, 1998 Council held a public discussion regarding the August 4 correspondence. As a result of the August 4 correspondence the MCES staff is expected to provide for a counter proposal. Further, it is expected that this proposal will be available in time for discussion at your August 19 meeting. Hence, this topic is being placed on your agenda as a workshop item. An aside to the above is that the Interceptor Advisory Committee is meeting on August 24. At this meeting it is expected that some speci£c recommendations will come forward. As a result the MCES has requested the opportunity to appear at your September 2 meeting to discuss the result. Ciiy of Cottage Grove ��� 7516 80th Street South / Conage Grove, Minnesota 55016 612 • 458-2800 August4,1998 Mr. Bryce Pickart Assistant General Manager, Technical Services Wastewater Services Department Metropolitan Council Environmental Services 230 E. Fifth Street, Mears Park Center St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1633 Via Facsimile to 602-1138 Dear Mr. Pickart: On July 31, 1998, the Cottage Grove City Council discussed the expected MCES proposal regarding roadway improvements concurrent with the Treatme�t Plant expansion. The Council is appreciative of MCES's recognition of responsibility for infrastructure and neighborhood impacts of this metro facility. Additionally, the Council opined that this $58 miilion facility has had, and will have, substantial long- term community impacts against which improvements of a positive nature should occur to provide an appropriate level of balance. I believe the Cottage Grove Gity Councii is in agreement with the leve� of improvement suggested by MCES staff to 110'" Street. On Ideal Avenue the MCES has proposed a 24 foot mill and overlay project with an off road trail with trail funding yet to be discussed. The Council appears to favor, instead, a roadway project on Ideal whicn results in a 30 foot paved travel surface, which inciudes marking such as to provide for a laneway system in addition to the turn lanes at 100�' and 110�'. It is expected that this project would actuaily result in cost savings from the original MCES trail proposal. Within the contemplated MCES proposal there does not appear to be affirmation of MCES responsibility toward 100"' and Jamaica to Highway 61, as has been discussed in the past. It is the Councii position that MCES should snoulder responsibiiity for all roadway needs between the piant and the state highway system. Further, that the City of Cottage Grove shouid not be in a position of subsidizing infrastructure needs of this regional facility to the benefit of the larger metro system and to the detriment of the local taxpayer. We have estimated that the improvements required for these two roadways are in the neighborhood of $600,000. This inciudes a partial reconstruction of Jamaica, as a 1998 project, towards which the Council is contemplating MCES contributions. Finally, it is the expectation of the EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER City Council that in ultimately determining the location of this plant, the MCES chose the most cost-effective site. Hence, it seems that providing for off site roadway infrastructure as proposed here is not a significant cost factor given what would have been experienced on other sites. The Cottage Grove City Council expects that that situation be recognized in the eventual agreement between the two parties. The City of Cottage Grove supports MCES efforts in making this regional facility less of a detriment to the surrounding neighborhood and the community at large. It is hoped that, in working together, the City and the MCES can strive toward achieving actual local benefits as well. Achievement of this goal, it seems, would be a demonstration of commitment to positive co4laborations in plant siting efforts in the future. Thank you for your continued cooperation. Sincerely, ���; � ���.���z�.; �G Ryan R. Schroeder