Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
City Council Regular Meeting
1 COTTAGE GROVE CITY COUNCIL September 17, 2025 COUNCIL CHAMBER - 7:00 PM 1 Call to Order 2 Pledge of Allegiance 3 Roll Call 4 Open Forum 5 Adoption of Agenda 6 Presentations A Public Safety Board Drone Donation and Acceptance Staff Recommendation: 1) Recognize the Public Safety Board for their donation of a DJI Matrice 4 Series Drone. 2) Accept the donation of the DJI Matrice 4 Series drone with the value of $10,536.15. 7 Consent Agenda A Convention and Visitors Bureau Meeting Minutes (2025-06-03) Staff Recommendation: Approve the June 3, 2025, Convention and Visitors Bureau Meeting Minutes B Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Meeting Minutes (2025-06-09) Staff Recommendation: Approve the June 9, 2025, Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Minutes. C Public Services Commission Meeting Minutes (2025-07-21) Staff Recommendation: Approve the July 21, 2025, Public Services Commission meeting Minutes. D Closed Special Meeting Minutes (2025-08-20) Staff Recommendation: Approve the August 20, 2025, Closed Special Meeting Minutes. E City Council Regular Meeting Minutes (2025-08-20) Staff Recommendation: Approve the August 20, 2025, City Council Regular Meeting Minutes. F Rental License Approvals Staff Recommendation: Approve the issuance of rental licenses to the properties listed in the attached table. G Ordinance Amendments Allowing Cannabis Paraphernalia Staff Recommendation: Adopt Ordinance 2025-1102 allowing the sale of cannabis paraphernalia in tobacco stores and cannabis-related retail stores. H Target Settlement Staff Recommendation: Approve the Stipulation of Settlement for Parcel 16 by and between Target Corporation and the City, authorize the execution of a Settlement Agreement and payment of the remaining balance of $217,300. I Assessment of Unpaid Special Charges on Private Property Staff Recommendation: 1) Adopt Resolution 2025-137, Declaring costs to be assessed and ordering preparation of the proposed assessment roll for unpaid special charges on private property. 2) Adopt 2 Resolution 2025-138, Calling for a public hearing on proposed assessments for unpaid special charges from private property. J 2025 Pavement Management Project - Declare Costs to be Assessed and Call for a Public Hearing Staff Recommendation: 1) Adopt Resolution 2025-135 declaring the costs to be assessed for the 2025 Pavement Management Project. 2) Adopt Resolution 2025-136 calling for a Public Hearing to be held on October 15, 2025, for the 2025 Pavement Management Project. K Utility and Engineering Division Building Final Payment - City Contracts Staff Recommendation: 1) Adopt Resolution 2025-125, authorizing payment in the amount $12,394.22 to Autumn Ridge Landscaping Inc. for the final payment for the Utility and Engineering Division Building Project. 2) Adopt Resolution 2025-127, authorizing payment in the amount $22,476.36 to Ebert, Inc. dba Ebert Construction for the final payment for the Utility and Engineering Division Building Project. 3) Adopt Resolution 2025-128, authorizing payment in the amount $3,818.55 to Ebert, Inc. dba Ebert Construction for the final payment for the Utility and Engineering Division Building Project. 4) Adopt Resolution 2025-129, authorizing payment in the amount $38,748.00 to Fobbe Electric, Inc. for the final payment for the Utility and Engineering Division Building Project. 5) Adopt Resolution 2025-133, authorizing payment in the amount of $8,570.77 to Jackson & Associates LLC for the final payment for the Utility and Engineering Division Building. 6) Adopt Resolution 2025-130 authorizing payment in the amount $997.71 to MCI, Inc. dba Multiple Concept Interiors, Inc. for the final payment for the Utility and Engineering Division Building Project.. 7) Adopt Resolution 2025-131, authorizing payment in the amount $949.80 to Spartan Steel Erectors, Inc. for the final payment for the Utility and Engineering Division Building Project. L Utilities and Engineering Division Building - Kraus Anderson Change Order #1 and Final Payment Staff Recommendation: Approve the KA GMP Reduction Change Order #1 in the amount of $665,642.45 for the Utilities and Engineering Division Building and adopt resolution 2025-132 approving the final payment for the Utilities and Engineering Division Building in the amount of $300,454.59 to Kraus Anderson Construction Company. M Wells 9 and 11 Interim Treatment Facilities Project - Final Payment Staff Recommendation: Adopt the attached resolution 2025-123 authorizing the final payment in the amount of $177,184.37 to Rice Lake Construction Group for the Well 9 and 11 Interim Treatment Facilities project. N Lamar Avenue Drainage Easement - Quote Award Staff Recommendation: Approve Resolution 2025-139 awarding the 2025 Erosion Repair & Storm Sewer Replacement Project to Dynamic Earth & Civil, LLC in the amount of $123,084.15, and the appropriate officials are hereby authorized to sign all necessary documents to effectuate these actions. O County 19A/100th St Realignment - TED and TEDI Grant Application Staff Recommendation: Adopt Resolution 2025-145 supporting the City’s TED and TEDI grant applications for the County 19A/100th Street Realignment Project. P MN DNR Outdoor Recreation Grant Agreement-Mississippi Dunes Park Staff Recommendation: Authorize MN Department of Natural Resources Outdoor Recreation Grant Agreement for $350,000 to be used for the Mississippi Dunes Park development project. Q River Oaks Solar Power Grant Application and Service Agreement Staff Recommendation: 1) Authorize staff to apply for the State of Minnesota’s Commerce Department of Energy and Utilities Solar on Public Buildings grant program to fund 70% of the River Oaks solar array project. 2) Upon award of the Solar on Public Buildings grant program, authorize a service agreement with Solar Connection for the installation of the River Oaks Solar Array for a total project cost of $143,672. R Leafline Labs – Medical Cannabis Combination Registration Staff Recommendation: Approve the Medical Cannabis Combination Registration for Leafline Labs, LLC at the location of 8235 97th Street South, Cottage Grove, MN. 3 8 Approve Disbursements A Approve Disbursements Staff Recommendation: Approve disbursements from 08-29-2025 through 09-11-2025 in the amount of $3,346,984.08. 9 Public Hearings A Pine Hill Elementary School Staff Recommendation: 1) Hold the public hearing to vacate certain easements within the Pine Hill Elementary School property at 9015 Hadley Avenue South. 2) Adopt Resolution 2025-140 to vacate certain easements within the Pine Hill Elementary School property at 9015 Hadley Avenue South. 3) Adopt Resolution 2025-141 to approve a Conditional Use Permit for an educational facility within a residential district. 4) Adopt Resolution 2025-143 to approve a Variance to allow a six-classroom building addition to Pine Hill Elementary School to encroach within the required 50-foot setback to the residential property line to the north. 5) Adopt Resolution 2025-142 to approve a site plan review for three additions totaling approximately 13,300 square feet and associated site work at Pine Hill Elementary School. 10 Bid Awards 11 Regular Agenda A Park Grove Library Staff Recommendation: 1) Adopt Resolution 2025-144 approving a Site Plan Review for a building addition, façade remodel, and exterior site improvements at Park Grove Library. 2) Adopt the Development Agreement with Washington County, subject to minor modifications as approved by the City Attorney. 12 Council Comments and Requests 13 Workshops - Open to Public 14 Workshops - Closed to Public 15 Adjournment 1 City Council Action Request 6.A. Meeting Date 9/17/2025 Department Public Safety Agenda Category Presentation Title Public Safety Board Drone Donation and Acceptance Staff Recommendation 1) Recognize the Public Safety Board for their donation of a DJI Matrice 4 Series Drone. 2) Accept the donation of the DJI Matrice 4 Series drone with the value of $10,536.15. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. Public Safety Board Donation Drone Sept 2025 2. Invoice-12609 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Peter J Koerner, Director of Public Safety Date: September 11, 2025 Subject: PUBLIC SAFETY BOARD DRONE DONATION ACCEPTANCE Introduction Drone Program Overview Need for a New Drone update and maintain. While the current drones are outdated, there is still uses in the city and one of the drones will be transferred to the Communications team. Capabilities of the New Drone • Thermal imaging camera and software that are among the best available • Map overlays displaying road names, house numbers, and business names • High-power zoom capability • AI software that can identify cars, vehicles, and boats Recommendation INVOICE 12609 ISSUE DATE AUG. 26, 2025 DUE DATE AUG. 26, 2025 SUPPLIER MAVERICK 7385 Highway 13 W Savage, MN 55378 United States SHIPPING ADDRESS BEN D COTTAGE GROVE POLICE DEPARTMENT 12800 Ravine Pkwy Cottage Grove, MN 55016 United States Email: bdeitner@cottagegrovemn.gov Phone: +16514586018 BILL TO COTTAGE GROVE POLICE DEPARTMENT 12800 Ravine Pkwy Cottage Grove, MN 55016 United States Email: bdeitner@cottagegrovemn.gov Phone: +16517560473 PAYMENT METHOD MANUAL PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER #12609 HAVE A BANDIT DAY! Subtotal $10,463.00 Shipping $73.15 Total $10,536.15 Amount Paid $10,536.15 AMOUNT DUE $0.00 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TAX AMOUNT TOTAL DJI Matrice 4 Series DJI Matrice 4T (Universal Edition) With Care Enterprise Plus - SKU: CP.EN.00000546.SP 1 8,900.00 $0.00 $8,900.00 DJI Matrice 4 Series Battery SKU: 16948526 3 259.00 $0.00 $777.00 DJI AS1 Speaker for Matrice 4 Series SKU: CP.EN.00000578.01 1 289.00 $0.00 $289.00 DJI AL1 Spotlight for DJI Matrice 4 Series 1 497.00 $0.00 $497.00 Phone: 6128089838 Email: sales@maverickdrone.com Website: www.maverickdrone.com View this document online at https://maverick-drone-systems-2.sufio.com/ cx33zwqfm5pg?nj7pz75r3b. Maverick 1 City Council Action Request 7.A. Meeting Date 9/17/2025 Department Communications Agenda Category Action Item Title Convention and Visitors Bureau Meeting Minutes (2025-06-03) Staff Recommendation Approve the June 3, 2025, Convention and Visitors Bureau Meeting Minutes Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. 6-03-2025 CVB Meeting Minutes MINUTES JUNE 3, 2025 CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE 12800 RAVINE PARKWAY SOUTH COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA 55016 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER - 7:30 A.M. A meeting of the Cottage Grove Convention and Visitors Bureau was held on the 3rd day of June, 2025, at 7:30 a.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:30 a.m. by Chairman Justin Olsen. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Chairman Olsen asked everyone to please stand and join him in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. ROLL CALL Chairman Olsen asked Alexa Anderson, Communications Specialist, to please do the roll. Members Present: Justin Olsen, Chairman Sarah Grecula, Director Michael Haatvedt, Director Tony Khambata, Director Laurie Levine, Director Erik Olson, Director Chris Reese, Director Members Absent: None. Staff Present: Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator Jaime Mann, Assistant to the City Administrator Alexa Anderson, Communications Specialist Phil Jents, Communications Manager Courtney Pirsig, Communications Specialist Others Present: None. 4. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA Director Tony Khambata made a motion to approve the agenda, Director Laurie Levine seconded. Motion carried: 7-0. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 5.1 Approval of November 26, 2024 CGCVB Meeting Minutes Chairman Olsen asked if anyone had any changes or corrections they wanted to make on the minutes. Director Khambata made a motion to approve the November 26, 2024 CGCVB Meeting Minutes, Director Sarah Grecula seconded. Motion carried: 7-0. City of Cottage Grove Convention and Visitors Bureau June 3, 2025 Page 2 of 13 6. PRESENTATIONS - None. 7. BUSINESS ITEMS 7.1 2024 Q4 and 2025 Q1 Lodging Tax Collection Chairman Olsen said our Communication Manager, Phil Jents, will be speaking on this item. Manager Jents thanked Chairman Olsen and the Board Members for being here. As Chairman Olsen said, we’re here to talk about the 2024 Q4 and 2025 Q1 Lodging Tax Collections, and then a couple other pertinent items for the Board to be aware of. So, before you are the 2024 Q4 Lodging Tax Collections and 2025 Q1 Lodging Tax Collections: The City collected a total of $17,449 in Q4 of 2024 and $16,469 in Q1 of 2025. In total, the 2024 Q4 Lodging Tax Collections was 13.5% over the 2024 Total Budgeted Revenue; the Food Truck Festival contributed heavily to that amount. Moving forward, you have the 2024 Lodging Tax and Revenue Collections numbers. Again noted there under Revenue Breakdown, you have Other Revenue, and that was largely the Food Truck Festival, which is, as you know, a very large, successful, and profitable event for the CVB. On the next slide, when it comes to Lodging Tax and Revenue, we have a couple pieces of information that we think are very pertinent for the Board to be aware and hopefully good news: When it comes to Lodging Tax Collections, the City will be handing that over to the Minnesota Department of Revenue. There were a couple actions by the City Council not too long ago that has the City now handing over our Lodging Tax Collections to the Minnesota Department of Revenue, as this is a service that they provide to municipalities; I believe Woodbury is also another community that’s engaging in this and has provided really amazing feedback about that system. Part of the reasoning for this is a couple fold: 1) When properties are delinquent in their Lodging Tax remissions, the weight and authority that a letter or enforcement actions from the Minnesota Department of Revenue has is far greater, with all due respect to the City of Cottage Grove, than the City going after properties to get those Lodging Taxes in order. 2) Additionally, it saves staff a ton of capacity and increasing efficiency and making sure that those Lodging Tax collections are here and on time. That will begin on July 1, 2025, which staff were very excited about. 3) The next thing is something you may have heard about, the Rentalscape Software from Deckard Technologies. Again, this will hopefully be improving efficiencies as well as overall Lodging Tax collections; this software gives us new and really incredible insight into short-term rentals (STRs) throughout the community, both ones that we know about and ones that are permitted and ones we may not know about and are not potentially permitted. So, this software scans through websites like Airbnb, VRBO, those are just the most well-known ones, to get us insight into those properties that exist out there in our City. So, this will lead ideally to better compliance for our unlicensed STRs and potentially increase our Lodging Tax collections. With all of that, Manager Jents said I’ll stand for any questions you all may have. Chairman Olsen said thank you, Phil, excellent information there, especially as it relates to the Lodging Tax collection. I’ll look to the Board, are there any questions for Phil on his presentation. None were asked, so Chairman Olsen said once again, thank you, Phil. 7.2 2024 Annual Report Chairman Olsen said this is the 2024 Annual Report, and Courtney Pirsig, Communications Specialist, has this for us today. Good Morning. Specialist Pirsig replied Good Morning, Chairman, Members of the Board. Today I’m going to go over the 2024 Annual Report with you, and you do have a copy in front of you as well. So, for the 2024 Visitor Guide, this is our third publication, and we had 7,000 copies printed for about $10,000; they were distributed to the Mall of America, Welcome and Visitor Centers in Minnesota, City Hall and the Cottage Grove Ice Arena also had them, and we sent them via mail if someone requested that on our website. We had six (6) paid advertisers, and we collected $4,450 in revenue for that. In 2025, Chandlerthinks recommended that we do a smaller Visitor Guide, kind of streamline the information, and so we saved $4,346 with our 2025 Visitor Guide. For the website, we had about 32,000 users visit our website. Our top three pages were event pages, which were for the Food Truck Festival, Strawberry Fest, and the Holiday Train. Our monthly newsletter we send every month for subscribers, and we have about 2,900 subscribers. So, we have a scheduled workshop after this presentation to discuss options for website enhancements, so we’ll go over that a little bit more after this. We worked with various photographers again in 2024 and then also worked with TrueLens Community Media, which was formerly known as SWCTC, and we did 15 videos with them. We also are continuing to build a diverse library that represents all ethnicities and cultures. City of Cottage Grove Convention and Visitors Bureau June 3, 2025 Page 3 of 13 For social media, it’s important to note that social media numbers always fluctuate and so they’re very volatile and dynamic, so it’s hard to explain why numbers go up and down sometimes, but this is kind of an average, just to give you an idea: • In 2024, we reached 6% less users on Facebook; however, we increased our following by 8%. • On Instagram, our reach decreased by 38%, but our follower and video count increased. • Our most popular YouTube videos were “Pickleball in Cottage Grove,” “Strawberry Fest,” and “Life of a Hunter.” • Our Top-Performing Campaign: Get Out and Explore MN, One Family Fest, we boosted that one for about $500 and saw about 114,000 impressions off of that. • Our Top-Performing Video was just a recap video from the Food Truck Festival - That’s a Wrap!, and we hit about 2,500 impressions on that one. Our partners in 2024 were the St. Paul Saints, Cottage Grove Strawberry Fest, the Chamber of Commerce, Explore Minnesota, SoWashCo CARES, and Minnesota Monthly. Our team engaged with attendees at four events: The Cottage Grove Chamber of Commerce Community Showcase, Community Night at the Saints game, Strawberry Fest, and the Food Truck Festival. Speaking of the Food Truck Festival, we estimated about 8,000-9,000 attendees. We hosted 40 food trucks, 10 sponsors, and 17 marketplace booths. Looking to 2025: So, we worked with Chandlerthinks, as you know, to develop a plan for the future, and we have a long list of things that we have put lots of thought towards; the ones on the screen are just kind of the ones that we’ve already started to implement, that have kind of gone past that brainstorming stage, so these items are currently in the works. We are currently launching the “Bring a Friend” campaign, which is part of the Strawberry Fest initiative. We did a coloring contest for that as well, and that’s just to encourage people who go to Strawberry Fest every year to bring a friend to participate in a tradition with them. We also are doing Patio Week in July, so we have started reaching out to residents about that, and we’ll talk a little bit more about that later in this presentation. We plan to implement a Tourism Summit, a regular stakeholder meeting, or potential awards, so more to come on that. We would really love to get out and attend other community events that are not in Cottage Grove, just to kind of promote the community in other cities. For social media, we plan to focus on local series spotlights; for example, we’ve been trying to push our parks, giving people examples of what they can do in our parks, what they can do for fun, example itineraries, Date Night in Cottage Grove, that sort of thing. Specialist Pirsig said with that, I’ll stand for any questions. Chairman Olsen said thank you very much, appreciate all the detailed information. Do we have any questions from the Board on 2024’s Annual Report? Director Grecula said not so much a question, but a comment: I think it would be really neat as part of the social media engagement to see some, you know, “Come spend a day with me in Cottage Grove” TikTok-style videos. I’m too old to make them, but I like watching those, and if you had some young people doing it, I think that would really grab some more engagement. Specialist Pirsig replied yeah, absolutely, thank you, Director; Chairman Olsen said that’s an excellent idea. Director Reese asked do we know how much reengagement that we have through our social media, as far as people coming back to our site, or do we parcel that out or do we just know we have visitors and we don’t really know if they’re unique visitors that are coming back? Specialist Pirsig asked do you mean with the website or social media? Director Reese replied social media. Specialist Pirsig replied we may be able to dig into that a little bit more; offhand, I’m not quite sure where those numbers are pulling from or if they’re revisiting or that sort of thing, but we can definitely look into that, thank you. Director Reese said okay, thank you. Director Khambata you had mentioned paying to boost the impressions on social media. Do you have like a comparison when you, like if you were to just post something vs. post it and pay to have it boosted, like what kind of difference in impressions you get? Specialist Pirsig replied yeah, definitely. So, I could pull up, okay, for example, our Top-Performing Video only had 2,500 impressions, right? But say we boosted that, so we spent $2,000 on the Food Truck Festival event, that got us about 162,000 impressions. So, it’s not an exact science, but you can kind of tell that it definitely has more numbers when you boost it, for sure. You definitely get your money’s worth in that sense. City of Cottage Grove Convention and Visitors Bureau June 3, 2025 Page 4 of 13 Director Khambata asked are we utilizing search-engine optimization when we’re like hosting? Specialist Pirsig replied yeah, so, we do, but I will say aren’t doing it as well as we could be, and that’s part of what we’re going to talk about with the website enhancements, because we get over 50% of our audience from SCO (Social Channel Optimization), and so it definitely could be better. Director Khambata said okay, thank you. Director Levine said I’ll just ask one more question on that. When you boost, what is the radius, miles; are you going out 25 miles, 50 miles, 100 miles, do you know? For like Strawberry Fest, I guess. Specialist Pirsig replied sorry, I’m going to have Jaime come up and answer that for you. Jaime Mann, Assistant to the City Administrator, replied it really depends on the event. So, with the Food Truck Festival, we kind of stayed to the metro area because we knew that our audience was pulling from that metro area. I believe for Strawberry Fest we extended the area of it further because for a multiday festival, your audience is a little bit bigger for that as well. Director Levine replied, okay, thank you. Chairman Olsen said I do want to follow up on the question about boosting our ads. This is coming from somebody who uses that function during campaign season, etc., I know that there’s some micro-targeting tools that are available. I don’t know how extensively we may be able to use those micro-targeting tools; but one of the things that I’ve always found helpful is let’s say, for example, you’re trying to target a specific age group or you’re trying to target a specific user group, maybe it’s pickleball players or something like that. Those tools seem to give you some leverage as it relates to that. Is that something that we’re currently doing or considering doing in terms of, for example, One Family Festival, maybe we’re targeting people who are sports enthusiasts because they do a lot of sports at the One Family Festival. I’m just curious if anybody can answer that for me, as far as the micro-targeting goes. Specialist Pirsig replied yeah, I’m gong to call Alexa up to the podium now. She is focusing on our social media now, so she can help you with that. Alexa said Good Morning, Chairman, and Members of the Board, that is correct, we are currently utilizing that function, and we kind of take it per event and what that may look like. Recently, we were working on, for example, the Egg Hunt with our Parks and Rec Department; that was one that we really honed in on keeping it somewhat local, so we only went 20 miles out, but then focusing on those people who have children within a certain age group that would be attending an event like that. Chairman Olsen replied good. It seems to me, in my limited experience, like that really helps you gain the most proverbial bang for your buck vs. just sort of throwing it out there and seeing what you catch. So, I’m glad to hear that we’re doing that. Thank you very much. Alexa replied yes, thank you. 7.3 2026 Explore Minnesota Tourism Grant Chairman Olsen said Phil gets back to the podium to talk to us about our 2026 Explore Minnesota Tourism Grant. Manager Jents said thank you, again, Chairman Olsen and Members of the Board. The 2026 Explore Minnesota Tourism Grant is an exciting opportunity for the Cottage Grove CVB, and it’s grant funding that was previously available to municipal Destination Marketing Organizations (DMOs) and the Cottage Grove CVB has successfully utilized this grant funding in the past. Unfortunately, Explore Minnesota recently removed that funding opportunity in recent years and only now just brought that back, which was exciting to see; albeit at slightly-lower levels than anyone would like, you’d always like a little bit more money or opportunity to get that, but nevertheless, it’s good to see it coming back. So the Cottage Grove CVB was eligible for up to $2,000 in grant funding, they have different eligibility parameters around different types of DMOs. For our particular municipal DMO, we were eligible for up to $2,000. It was a competitive grant opportunity that closed in late April, 2025, and the grants were funded on a first come, first served basis if awarded. So, given that tight timeline and those parameters, the City thought it would be prudent to submit an application in order to not miss this opportunity, and we were awarded the full $2,000 for what we’re branding a “Savor the Summer” online marketing campaign; that’s going to be geared towards the Food Truck Festival, One Family Festival, or other late summer activities, and Chairman Olsen, your comment about targeting is certainly a good one. That would be one campaign where we absolutely would target a certain type of age range or a certain type of plant, if you will, like foodies that live in the greater Twin Cities area, for instance. Namely, this marketing will be, like I said, toward people who enjoy food opportunities, or foodies, if you will, in the Twin Cities metro area and who might be inclined to visit Cottage Grove for a unique Food Truck Festival or other fun dining options. This grant has a 1:1 Cash Match, and the thinking behind this grant was that we already have budgeted marketing dollars that would normally be spent on marketing Cottage Grove, things like the Food Truck Festival, One Family Fest, etc. So, why not take those dollars and leverage them with this grant in order to double our marketing potential and potentially increase its impact. So, if City of Cottage Grove Convention and Visitors Bureau June 3, 2025 Page 5 of 13 you’re wondering hey, why didn’t the Board hear about this grant opportunity earlier? Again, the tight timeframe of its first come, first served basis, competitive, once all the grant funds are awarded and they’ve reached the end of their funding pool, that’s it. If you apply even within the window, you’re not going to get any money, so we again thought it was prudent to not miss that opportunity and take marketing dollars we would already have budgeted and spent towards marketing these events and apply for that grant. So, with all of that, I’m happy to stand for questions, and also, you have a Recommendation before you. Recommendation: Approve the Cottage Grove Convention and Visitors Bureau to execute the grant agreement between Explore Minnesota and the Cottage Grove CVB. Chairman Olsen said thank you, a really great opportunity for us. I mean, it’s nice that they’ve brought this back, I know it’s something that we utilized early on with the CVB. Any questions for Phil on this grant; I think it’s pretty clear that we definitely want to move forward with this so I am seeking a motion to approve. Director Khambata made a motion to approve the Cottage Grove Convention and Visitors Bureau to execute the grant agreement between Explore Minnesota and the Cottage Grove CVB. Director Erik Olson seconded the motion. Chairman Olsen asked if there was any further discussion on this. Director Khambata said when I was on Council, I always tried to encourage specifically, you know, there’s a lot of parks grants, and I always tried to encourage going out for these grants. Even if we weren’t going to score the highest score or whatever, because it’s just every opportunity that we get like this is one more layer we can add to our approach. So, I would say good work, and thank you to staff for pursuing this. Chairman Olsen said absolutely, yeah, I echo that sentiment for sure. Motion carried: 7-0. 7.4 2025 Events Update Chairman Olsen said Alexa, welcome back to the podium. Alexa replied thank you. Good Morning, Chairman, and Members of the Board. So, we’re going to run through some of our upcoming events we have for the rest of the year: • Strawberry Fest: Is just three short weeks away, running from June 19 to June 22. As mentioned previously, this year we are launching our “Bring a Friend” initiative; this is encouraging residents to bring friends from outside of the community to join in this beloved tradition within our community with us this year. This has been really focused on through our communications and will continue to be a large point of our communications going forward, as you’ll see. Discover Cottage Grove will host a booth in the Strawberry Fields Marketplace this year, and following along with our initiative, we are bringing back our friend, Eric Dowdle. So, he will be there joining us, signing puzzles, meeting attendees, and greeting our talented Coloring Contest artists. Speaking on that a little bit more, we currently have 40 entries for our Coloring Contest, so we will be displaying all of those Coloring Contest entries at our booth, in a binder. We’ll be inviting all of those coloring artists to come and see their art, meet Eric Dowdle, and then we will also be giving a certificate to the four finalists of that competition. As you saw at your seat this morning, we will also have those fun giveaways, including a drawstring bag, Visitor Guide, beachball, the color-changing cups, and then a flyer for our Food Truck Festival as well. • Our 3rd Annual Food Truck Festival: Will be at Kingston Park on Saturday, September 13, and it will run from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. At the festival, we will be celebrating one year of having the puzzle, so we will be doing puzzle sales and then also have those same giveaways that you had at your seat here this morning. More details and information regarding the festival, including the food truck lineup, marketplace vendors, and bands will come at the August Board Meeting. • Patio Week: Discover Cottage Grove will be hosting its first-ever Patio Week; this year it’s going to be July 13-July 19. This was a creative idea suggested by the Chandlerthinks team to create a food-centered week within our community to really highlight what we have here. As a team, we landed on Patio Week, and with the warmer weather in July, we thought that was very fitting. There will be one restaurant patio featured each day of that week. Other Events: Fourth of July Fireworks, hosted by the Cottage Grove Lions, this will be on July 6, it starts at dusk at Kingston Park. The One Family Labor Day Weekend Event; Hometown Holiday, which will be on December 4; and then the Holiday Train for which we do not yet have a date. With that, I will stand for any questions on upcoming events. Chairman Olsen said that’s an outstanding list of events, lots of exciting things coming up, thank you for that. He asked if there were any questions about the list of the events or any of the details around those. City of Cottage Grove Convention and Visitors Bureau June 3, 2025 Page 6 of 13 Director Levine said I’ll just make a quick comment on the Patio Week, that’s fantastic, I’m super excited about that. So, anything the Chamber can do to help advertise that on our calendar, too, please send my way. Alexa replied absolutely, thank you, Director Levine. Chairman Olsen said now that could be a lot of fun for sure. Chairman Olsen asked if there were any other questions, but there were none; he said, all right, I do have a couple. First, with respect to the puzzle, and we have Eric coming back. I’ve seen a little bit of social media out there already about he’ll be here and he’ll be signing puzzles and what have you; will there be any other, I guess, interesting events that will feature him, per se, that Strawberry Fest is going to be doing as sort of a nod to hey, this guy’s in town again, he’s a big deal. Have they come up with anything that you’re aware of that they want to do with him? Alexa replied currently, in terms of Strawberry Fest hosting anything connected to it, we do not know of anything. We did center our Coloring Contest around the puzzle, so it has a “Bring your Friends” and also the puzzle kind of incorporated within the artwork itself. We will have him there signing puzzles as well, meeting with people, and he will be doing some promotion on his own page as well. Chairman Olsen said it seems like an opportunity for them; I wonder if it would make sense to reach out to members of the Strawberry Fest Committee, whether that’s the president, Lori, or I know some others like Erik Witt and Katie Tobritzhofer, and if you guys would like me to do that, I’m happy to do that. Just to plant the seed that he’ll be here. I mean, let’s find a way to keep him busy, but obviously, we have to also keep in mind his own personal desires and things. Phil, go ahead. Phil said that’s a great point, and I have been in communication with Strawberry Fest, multiple phone calls and emails, as well as attended a Committee Meeting; I forget when the last one was, where I brought the Coloring Contest, before it went out, to them to see what they thought and hopefully get some feedback from them as well. So, we’ve been in contact with Lori and with the Strawberry Fest. Chairman Olsen said we do have a certain Council Member who tends to get pretty excited about Strawberry Fest, so that could be a leverage point as well, not that I want to mention Dave’s name, but just to make it clear. Chairman Olsen said the other thing I wanted to mention is I know some of you are aware of this, but the Mississippi River Valley Beyond the Yellow Ribbon team is organizing what they call a Ruck Run fundraiser the morning of the Food Truck Festival at Kingston Park. And this is one of those things that seems to be taking off, I’m seeing a lot of this Ruck Run fundraising going on in various communities; in fact, there was just a big one over the weekend here, somewhere over in Inver Grove and that area. I know that their intent is they want to bring people in for this event to fundraise for military families and veterans, etc.; but they’re trying to time it in such a way where all the events are going to end right around 10:30, so that everybody stays because they’ll be hungry after running with the rucksack on for the Food Truck Festival. So, there could be some cross promotion opportunities there, just wanted to mention that. And then the last thing, and this is probably a little early, but we had a lot of trucks last year, a lot. What are we thinking this year? Are we going to be in the same general vicinity? Did we feel like maybe it was one or two, too many, or one or two, too few? What’s the game plan? Jaime replied thank you, Chairman, and Members of the Board, we did reduce our food truck count this year, so we’re going to cap it at 35 food trucks. Applications are coming in, the committee has selected the 35 food trucks, I think we had 47 apply; so, I do have wait-list trucks if the some of the original trucks that were chosen drop out of the running, which happens quite often. So, we will cap it at 35 trucks for this year. The marketplace is wide open, so we have plenty of space available in the marketplace to add on this year. Chairman Olsen replied outstanding, good, thank you. Well, hopefully, as the word spreads, more and more people will first of all, want to come as a vendor, and second of all, want to come as an attendee. That’s great news, so we’re off to a good start. Chairman Olsen asked if there was any other feedback on 2025 events, there was none. Chairman Olsen said the next item is a Workshop, Open to the Public, and this is our Convention and Visitors Bureau Website Discussion, which will take place in the St. Croix Room. What that means is we won’t actually adjourn the meeting here, we’ll adjourn it in the St. Croix Room. So, I’m going to give everybody just a few minutes to matriculate over to the St. Croix Room, where we’ll reassemble and we’ll go through this discussion. Once that discussion’s complete, we will adjourn this meeting. With that, everybody can move over for the Workshop. Thank you. 8. WORKSHOP - OPEN TO THE PUBLIC - ST. CROIX ROOM 8.1 CVB Website Discussion City of Cottage Grove Convention and Visitors Bureau June 3, 2025 Page 7 of 13 Phil said Chandlerthinks helped us with this process, and there’s still a lot of recommendations for the CVB to consider. I say consider because while they were an excellent consultant, we’re very happy with their work and their recommendations, but what they say is not gospel, right? We don’t have to do what they say, they’re a consultant, and we pay them for a recommendation, and so we consider those, but one of the things that we are considering is the website. One thing that we learned throughout that Strategic Planning process, and then even afterward, is while the website is a nice design and nice website overall, its certainly not getting a failing grade or anything like that, it is a great opportunity to think about either a refresh or at the very least, considering moving it to a different hosting platform. So, even the website as is, even if we change no design aesthetics of it at all, it is a little difficult to work on, on the back end; and so, for staff and for IT to make changes on where things are located and how things navigate. Its not the most user friendly, and its very cumbersome to keep updated regularly. As you know, as a DMO and as a tourism destination, fresh new content is very important, right? And, so, as things get more and more tired and out of date, it doesn’t look so good for the overall image of our tourism image, for lack of a better word. Also, we don’t have the greatest insights into the website in terms of metrics. We can see traffic, we can see basic information, but again, that information is slow or difficult to come by and not perhaps what it could be in terms of there was a question earlier about kind of reengagement. I think that was around more social media, but who’s coming to our website and where are they coming from, why are they there, how much time are they lingering on certain pages, those metrics can be tough to really get at. Right now, our website traffic is not so great, it definitely could be better, who’s coming to our website and how much time they’re spending on it. You’ll see in the next slide it definitely needs improvement. So, with that, the overall design of the website, like I said is ripe for a potential refresh, and at the very least migrating it over to a new hosting platform would be I would consider a minimal improvement; so, even if we keep the website exactly as is but host it on our new platform that is easier to use and easier to update would certainly still be a step in the right direction. So, that’s just some background for where we are today. In terms of website analytics, you can see, just like I can, that it’s a lot of red. It’s not very exciting, with the exception of September, which miraculously didn’t change at all. I don't know how that’s even statistically possible, but it happened. As Courtney indicated earlier, over 15% of our traffic is coming from SEO (Search Engine Optimization) and keywords. One of Chandlerthinks’ recommendations that we almost certainly will be moving forward with is improving SEO functionality. When you Google weddings in Minneapolis, does Cottage Grove come up? Does the CVB website come up? Now, obviously, we’re not in Minneapolis, we know that, but for those that might be looking for a unique venue, say a farm location or River Oaks, they may be interested in some of the wedding offerings that we have here in Cottage Grove. So, a lot of room for improvement in terms of traffic, a lot of room for improvement in terms of SEO, and part of why we’re here discussing the website is some of that information there. So, when looking at other websites as inspiration, you know, why not look to other DMOs, what are they doing, what’s working well for them, what looks nice, or what doesn’t work very well. We went out and looked at a lot of them, I have a few website examples that I’ll pull up here, but we looked at a lot more; we have about two full pages of notes of different DMO websites out there in the world, mostly Minnesota, but some across the country, like Asheville. So, while you’re not going to see all two pages of websites that we looked at, we have a few here. Our intent is not to show you, hey, we want to have Asheville, North Carolina’s website, it is that there is something in that website that has a design element or a feature that we really liked, that we thought we could bring over to here, at least for consideration. And so in the case of Asheville, what we really liked is this is the main home page, so right when you go to Asheville’s website, you see right off the gate they are a full-year destination, 12-month destination; they have summer, fall, winter, and spring categories right in front of your face on the home page, which to my eyes says to a casual visitor, there’s something for me to do here, no matter what time of the year it is. Cottage Grove’s obviously an all four seasons destination, so we thought that was very interesting. Another thing that’s very interesting about this, in addition to showing you right off the bat that you have something to do here no matter what time of the year it is, is it almost forces you to engage in the website right out of the gate. I see I’ve got summer, fall, winter, and spring as options of things to do in Asheville, I want to click on one of those; I have a trip that I’m thinking about going in spring, and I want to click on spring and see what’s going on in Asheville. So, right out of the gate, I’m thinking there’s a lot to do here, and I’m now into the website, into the inner workings of it and into the itineraries that they have built in, and we thought that was really interesting. Next is Albert Lea and there again, the main home page is very pleasing to look at, a very nice image, very high-quality image, which we liked. But in in addition to that, the thing we keyed in on is just their global navigation at the top. So, you see we’re hiring, community calendar, monthly email, outstanding senior, but right in the middle is their logo; so, very prominent branding, very easy to identify who they are and what their branding and imagery is, and then literally, I don’t know a heck of a lot about Albert Lea. I look at that photo and go, that’s the kind of place I might want to go, who doesn’t love a Saturday on a pontoon on a lake, right? So, just very pleasing imagery, and then again, the logo branding is very nice in terms of how they have the navigation set up. Park Rapids, and again, going back to not that we want our website to be Asheville’s or Albert Lea’s or Park Rapids’, but elements that they have in there that we really enjoyed, that we could beg, borrow, or steal from. Park Rapids, this is not their home page, City of Cottage Grove Convention and Visitors Bureau June 3, 2025 Page 8 of 13 this is one of many categories that they have for itinerary builders, so this one happens to be Sports and Recreation, there are many others, different categories; what’s really neat about this one is as you go through and look at, I’m a kayaker, I’m a biker, I’m an outdoor enthusiast, right? I go in and look at their camp wilderness, Itasca adventures, all of the different things they have listed there, anything that I like, I click that little heart on the top right of the image there, and on the far right, where it says Plan with a little heart on top of it, when you click that, it builds the itinerary of all the things that I just liked. So, now I can see and I can start planning out my Friday, my Saturday, and my Sunday, etc. I can save that itinerary, I can share it with others, very interactive, very easy to use, it was an intuitive way of building an itinerary, which we really liked. Phil said so if, strong emphasis on the word if, we do anything to change the website, we thought it prudent to look at general cost estimates. Of course, these are estimates, they could change, based on hard quotes from vendors or anything like that, but to move our existing site, like I said earlier, keep it completely as is, in terms of the design, but move it to a new platform, while that seems simple, they do actually technically have to completely rebuild the website, but just keeping the design aesthetics. That’s just how that works to move that over to a new platform. So, you may think, well, that’s not very expensive, that won’t take very long, but actually you are still building the website if that makes sense; and, so, that estimate is roughly in the range of $5,000-to-$10,000. For a full website redesign on a new platform, so again, we’re going to completely overhaul how it looks, how it navigates, where things are located, and host it on a new platform, you’re looking at a slight increase of about $7,000-to-$12,000 total. Again, those are estimates, just for the sake of conversation, those aren’t like hard quotes. If we were to move forward with anything, any changes to the website this year, we have looked at potential unspent marketing dollars, approximating up to about $10,000, or savings from printing costs; Courtney mentioned earlier the Visitor Guide in 2025 was a little smaller and streamlined, and we saved a little over $4,000, I believe, on printing costs alone for that. So, those savings, again, approximating up to about $4,000, are some potential funding sources if we move the website to a new platform or completely overhaul it. That if is part of why we’re here; as you can probably read between the lines, there are essentially three options with the website: Option 1-Do nothing, leave it as is, keep the design; obviously, we can still update the content, we can write new blogs for it, we can write new itineraries, we can create new images, we can do all sort of fun and cool and creative things with the website to keep it updated and keep it fresh. Essentially, that’s business as usual, that’s kind of the status quo option. Option 2-Keep the design but move it to a new platform. Option 3-The full redesign, again changing aesthetics, all sorts of different things, and moving it to a new platform. Phil said with all of that, those are our options, and we’ll leave it open to questions or discussion. Chairman Olsen replied, all right, I see hands; before we move forward, I was remiss earlier, I should have done this and I didn’t. We have a new addition to the Board. I don't know how many of you know Michael, but Michael is brand new today to the Board. He is a member of the Cottage Grove Lions Club, in fact, he’s one of our Vice Presidents, we have two, so we have a first and we have a second. He’s a Cottage Grove guy, obviously has some fashion sense. So, what I’d like to do is just go around the room real quick and let everybody introduce themselves briefly so Michael knows who you are, and then Michael, when we get to you, maybe you can spend a minute giving everybody your bio as well. I’ll start to my left here with Director Khambata. I’m Tony Khambata, I’ve been on here since December, and I was previously on the City Council, and prior to that, I was on the Planning Commission; and I’ve been spending time with Laurie for I don't know, 10 years now, in some capacity, so between Strawberry Fest and that, trying to help out. And then I’m a real estate broker, so I’m with RE/MAX, right here in town, so I thank Justin and Sonya for getting me involved. Erik Olson, a 20+ year resident in Cottage Grove, I’m also a member of the Cottage Grove Lions. I’ve been on this Board approximately 16-to-18 months and enjoy it, and I see the growth; we’re growing and getting stronger with some wind in the sails, so I think you joined a good team. Michael said well, yeah, so thank you for having me and appointing me to this. I just look forward to working with everybody. You know, as part of the Lions, it made me also appreciate the community, appreciate who and what the community is, and that’s what got me involved. I really like, as I stated earlier to some of you, doing a lot of things with being a Reserve with the officers here as well; that’s rewarding by itself. Part of the Lions I first got involved with, and then the Reserves, and now here, but I love giving back to the community, I love just being a part of things. My background is in hospitality, I’m a foodie and I love it, and you know, I owned a bar and restaurant in Hastings; that was fun for a while until COVID hit, and then, you know, I left that behind. But that’s what brought me to this, and again, being part of something of this caliber is rewarding, it gets me back into my hospitality field, so it just makes me feel good. Chairman Olsen replied good, well, welcome. Michael replied thank you. City staff introduced themselves, as follows: Phil Jents, Communications Manager City of Cottage Grove Convention and Visitors Bureau June 3, 2025 Page 9 of 13 Becca Bair, Administrative Specialist Courtney Pirsig, Communications Specialist, but I focus kind of on the graphic designs Alexa Anderson, Communications Specialist, and I focus on social media Jaime Mann, Assistant to the City Administrator Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator Chris Reese, almost 30-year resident of Cottage Grove. I spent about a decade and a half on the Planning Commission and did other things and they escape me, I’m getting old. My background is Marketing and Public Relations, so Justin recruited me, brought me out of retirement. Sarah Grecula, I think I’ve been on this Board for about a year and a half, as my first official Cottage Grove thing. I’ve been in the City for 9 years, and I’m a Business Analyst as my regular role. Laurie Levine, I’m the President of the Cottage Grove Area Chamber of Commerce. I’ve been a resident here for 35 years. I’ve been a part of this Board since it started, and come this summer, all 5 of my grandkids will be raised in Cottage Grove, so I’m very excited, yeah, really excited to have that happen. Chairman Olsen said you guys all know me. Chairman Olsen said Phil went through some pretty interesting things. Chris, I saw you had some comments you wanted to share. Director Reese replied yeah, I forgot already. Director Khambata said I have 3 questions: 1) Do we have to go out for an RFP if we change platforms, or is that a decision we can make just at our own discretion? Phil replied based on my research, it looks like we have to get two quotes to do Options 2 or 3; obviously, with Option 1, we don’t have to do anything. 2) In researching platforms, were you able to obtain feedback from other end users as to which one might have the best functionality for what we need? 3) Obviously, there is like an opportunity cost and a monetary cost to making this transfer; do we have kind of a standard or a metric for if it’s successful, if we’re getting our money’s worth, or what’s our exit strategy if it, too, doesn’t kind of net us the result we want? Phil replied Chairman Olsen, Director Khambata, really great questions. To the second question on platform, one platform that we as staff and IT are particularly interested in is the Wix platform. It’s very user friendly, very easy to use when it comes to updating the website, I mean, about as foolproof as it gets. Obviously, there are certainly others out there, and your question about end-user feedback, mostly that’s been internal end-user feedback, people who are familiar with the Wix platform, who are currently on staff. We’ve not gone out, you know, and say asked Woodbury or Inver Grove or whoever else, what platforms are they using and how do they like it or not like it. It’s something we certainly could do, and if we were to go forward with Options 2 or 3, that’s something we would want to seek that feedback, for sure. Director Khambata replied okay. Phil said I’m sorry, and the third question on how it’s successful. I think there’s potentially a couple answers there, and the first being the platform question, right? So, it’s a little less concrete in terms of data, it’s more like user experience; is it easy to update the website or isn’t it? Right now, it’s not, and if we move it to Wix or some other easier platform, and all of us are making updates and it’s a lot easier and quicker and more snappy, then that would be a measure of success for me that anyone, ourselves included or excluded, could come in and work through the website on the back end and have a good experience, an easy experience. The second measure of success would be like website analytics, right? Are all of those reds going up, or are they staying the same or are they getting worse? Obviously, we wouldn’t want them to get worse, and, you know, crystal balls are crystal balls. I can’t guess any better than you all can that a new website is going to all of a sudden turn all those numbers green in 6 months. You know, we do our best to put our best product forward, and I guess the question is, is the website right now the best product that’s being put forward? Director Khambata said and then, actually, I have one more question. So, looking at the budget for 2024, it looks like we landed at like $137,000 in Expenses and $112,000 in Revenue. I know part of that is we’re trying to predict what the incoming revenue is going to be; we have a little bit more control over the Expense portion, we saw a lot of success with some of our events, like the Food Truck Festival. When we talk about savings from last year, is that money that’s still rolled in and budgeted for this year that we can basically kind of defer to this project, or is that going to show up as a $12,000 red line at the end of the year, where we’re kind of like above and beyond what our budgeted projections are? Phil replied I’ll look to City Administrator Levitt or Assistant to the City Administrator Mann to correct me if I’m wrong, but those savings, part of why I listed the language, you know, potential funding sources this year I think is the answer to your question. Again, I’ll look to them to correct me if I’m wrong, but those savings then we’ve got either from the printing costs from the Visitor Guide or unspent marketing dollars; that would be the opportunity this year with those funds. Director Khambata said yeah, that’s the way I interpreted it, is it’s money that we already have budgeted, and we would defer it for this project, or as you said, unspent marketing dollars; so, rather than going to something else, it’s going to go to this. City of Cottage Grove Convention and Visitors Bureau June 3, 2025 Page 10 of 13 Phil replied right. Director Khambata said but I was kind of wanting to clarify that it wasn’t going to be like an extra burden on the budget for us to do this. Jaime replied correct. I would say the one unique thing about the Visitors Bureau is we have funds that were leftover from previous years that have rolled into this year, so those always remain in our budget as well to cover if we have some additional expenses, too. I don't know what the number is right now, off the top of my head, but it is unique about the fund. Director Khambata replied okay, good; Chairman Olsen said that’s good feedback, thank you. Director Levine asked what platform are we using now? Phil replied I believe it’s WordPress. Director Levine asked is WordPress on here, which Phil confirmed. Director Levine said okay, and then this website originally was designed by was it Sievers Creative? Phil replied Sievers is who’s hosting it, yeah. Director Levine asked so they do host it, but you’re all updated and that now, right? We’re not doing any marketing with them anymore; I mean, they’re not doing anything with the updates now, right? You’re now doing that inhouse? Phil replied correct. I’ll look to my colleagues if there are other updates that Sievers has to make. Jaime replied we actually have 2 updates per month that they will make for us; we do pay them $140 a month to host our website and do that. We have been lacking in getting reporting from them, though, over the past year or so. Courtney said but they’re quick to respond. If we reach out, they will provide that information, they just don’t do it regularly. Director Grecula asked if you got one of the, like the Wix platform, would that free up any IT time? Would that make it so user friendly that Communications staff could make updates without needing to use IT staff? Because I know usually they’re a scant resource in most places. Phil replied I think the answer is yes. I mean, I don’t want to sit here and say like all of a sudden IT is going to have all these hours of free time, like I don’t think it’s, you know; I think the shortest answer is yes, it would help out a lot. Alexa, myself, Courtney, Jaime, Becca, any one of us could go in and make those updates pretty quickly and easily as opposed to bothering IT. Obviously, they’re great to help and they’re a great resource, but we’d be able to do those lickety-split, you know, we could discuss an idea and have it up on the website later that day; and IT is busy, they’re great but they’re busy, you know, and it depends on their ticket workflow of where we land in the queue when we ask them for help. Director Grecula said so, it sounds like you’d be a lot more nimble if you could; Phil replied correct. Chairman Olsen said snappy is the word I heard. Chairman Olsen said Chris, did you have something? Director Reese replied yeah, I remembered. Well, it’s kind of piling on that, what kind of content opportunities are we missing out on now because we’re not able to post content quickly? Phil replied I think, you know, as we look to get new photography, new videography, blog posts, and then I think the question is more about content, but in my mind, it’s both content and functionality. You know, right now the website is good, you know, I don’t want to act like this is some terrible, terrible thing; but when you look at itinerary builders and getting people in the mindset of what can I do in Cottage Grove, I think right now, with all due respect to Cottage Grove, it has a branding problem right now. It doesn’t really know necessarily what it is, or at least our marketing doesn’t necessarily have an identity. And if I can go on to our website and very quickly and easily see that content or build that itinerary and see that there are things to do here, then I think that’s the opportunity there. In terms of content and what we’re missing, I will maybe look to my colleagues, as you’ve had more time working on the website than I have, and what you’re not able to do now, or at least it’s cumbersome to do now. Courtney replied yeah, so, I would say our calendar is one of our highest-visited pages, and right now, it’s not as populated as it should be because it’s very time consuming to add an event. We have to go searching for them, and then add them in, and then add the SEO, and then the photos. Like, it’s just not user friendly, the photos are not great, that sort of thing. So, when we talked internally about what could we do to upgrade our website, the calendar was a big one, focusing on that, because that’s what people are looking at, really. So, that would be a big one for content. Chairman Olsen replied don’t forget TikTok videos. Sarah said it sounds like she wants to be a part of them. Chairman Olsen asked, Chris, do you have a follow up? Director Reese replied, oh, yeah, I wrote down lots now. But as part of that, with the new website, would there be more opportunity to do like community content creators to add in and connect with? More engagement, whether it’s through blogs or connecting with our Facebook; you know, we’ve got like 5-or-6 different Cottage Grove Facebook pages that do have actually pretty big followings. Would we have interest in allowing content creators from the community to participate? City of Cottage Grove Convention and Visitors Bureau June 3, 2025 Page 11 of 13 Alexa replied yeah, we loved, when we were looking at other websites, kind of linking like an Instagram at the bottom; so like if they hash tagged fishing on our fishing page, we could have all of these fishing Instagram photos that people have posted in Cottage Grove, something like that. Phil said and we did look at a website that has that; Alexa replied yep, so right now, we’re not able to do that. Chairman Olsen replied as long as we monitor it; Phil replied right, yes, that’s right. Chairman Olsen said there’s the potential for malfeasance there. Jaime replied one other thing we looked at was having a kind of locals feature on our website, where it’s the local’s favorite things to do in Cottage Grove and things like that, so we could get local people involved in this. Member of the board said and that builds on that “Come Spend a Day with Me” idea that you have, which I think is a great idea; and then Director Reese, to build on your point, I mean there’s a ton of local Twin Cities, you know, food influencers among other categories that we could potentially partner with and have content on our website. Director Grecula replied I love that idea. I’ve always thought we could get even like some high school kids in exchange for having their work on the website with their college portfolios to make it more appealing to the youth, and I would assume, I loved your idea of content creators. I assume we have some people here that do this professionally, there’s somebody that lives in my neighborhood that’s a host on Twin Cities Live, which I think Cottage Grove has used her a little bit; but we could probably leverage the citizens that already have platforms a little bit more. Director Khambata asked in terms of redundancy, if we migrate to like the Wix platform, there’s more than one person on staff that can efficiently navigate that site, right? So, it’s like if we have turnover, or somebody takes a new role, like we’re not leaving that vital task unattended, right? Phil replied correct, and that’s one of the reasons why I mentioned we turned so heavily towards Wix is everyone right now in IT, you know, they get a big smile on their face when we talk about Wix, because they know it and they like it, and they’re very familiar with it, same as our own staff, so, yeah. Chairman Olsen asked are there any other questions, thoughts, or concerns? Director Haatvedt replied well, Wix, I have experienced that, my daughter has experienced that; she’s been working with Wix on her own website, I don't know, since 13 years old, and she loves it. She’s a singer, songwriter, and she has her own website with them, and she has fun with it. I mean, it’s very user friendly, so, on that note, I just wanted to give you a little background. Chairman Olsen said Michael’s daughter is amazing, by the way. She’s like a what, 15, 16-year-old college kid? Director Haatvedt replied yes, she’s just graduating from Park, coming up in a couple days; two years earlier, she started college when she was 13. Chairman Olsen replied she’s a singer, songwriter, she’s incredible. Director Haatvedt said she’s graduating and now she’s going to Nebraska, so, they leave your hands really quick. Chairman Olsen replied yeah, she definitely takes after her mother, for sure. Director Haatvedt said I don't know if it’s babysitting from afar or, but we’ll see. Chairman Olsen said so, my piece of feedback, echoing much of what everybody else talked about, was integration. If we’re going to do this, is there an opportunity, then, to work with the other various nonprofits and clubs and different things in the community? Because when you think about Discover Cottage Grove and Phil, you mentioned we have a branding problem, I always come back to people, I always come back to the great thing about our community is the people and all the different things that the people of our community get involved with and that spirt of volunteerism. You know, how do we engage visitors in that? I’ll tell you a quick story about that: We were at ICSC a couple weeks ago, Tony was with on that trip, and we met with a group of people who work here in the Twin Cities, one of whom is a Cottage Grove resident, and they were asking about Cottage Grove, tell me about Cottage Grove, tell me about it. As we started talking about it, the one lady’s like, oh, my God, I have goosebumps. She’s like seriously, that’s your community? Yeah, that’s our community. We get involved, we help each other out, we have all these different events that we do. When we do the Park Hall of Fame, it’s full, everybody comes; that doesn’t happen in Woodbury, that doesn’t happen, you know, East Ridge doesn’t even have a Hall of Fame. When we do golf tournaments, all the various agencies come together and help each other out, and when we have the Holiday Train, it’s a massive event and those kinds of things. That is such an important element of who we are as a community, and so, if there’s a way to integrate and layer in some of when you Discover Cottage Grove, think about not only this event, but who’s going to be at that event; and introduce yourself to the Lions Club, Lions International is the largest organization of its kind in the world, and when we go places, we actually take pictures of other Lions stuff, we call it Lions Tracks, and we send it up to our local group. But we’re always looking to introduce ourselves to other Lions and trade pins and things like that, and you’d be amazed, it sounds geeky, but people do it and it’s a big deal. So, anyway, if you think about this integration, I think what you’re looking for from us today is what do we want to do? So, my question would be this: Option 3 seems to be what you’d like, but can we afford it? City of Cottage Grove Convention and Visitors Bureau June 3, 2025 Page 12 of 13 Director Reese said can I ask a question off of that? Chairman Olsen replied go ahead, yes. Director Reese asked, so, the $7,000-to- $12,000 for a full redesign, is that inclusive of, if we just did the relaunch, you had the $5,000-to-$7,000; if we did $7,000-to-$12,000 is that on top of, or is that just? Chairman Olsen replied no, that’s the net. Director Reese replied okay. Chairman Olsen asked if there were other questions. Member of the board said my comment is this: If we have this vision of Option 3, I would be in favor of it, and here’s why: It’s a multiyear investment, we’re not going to change this every year. So, when you advertise it over X years, whether that’s 3 years, 5 years, if it’s really, really good, it’d be 8 years, but technology changes, we all get that. But it’s not a 1-year charge right here, it’s just not, so, I think we need to look at that as a multiyear investment. The other thing is if we want to truly be honest and compete, maybe not with Asheville, North Carolina, but with Albert Lea, Park Rapids, Albert Lea’s population, you know, is 20,000 or 25,000, Park Rapids is certainly smaller; we’re a nice-sized community, I think we deserve to invest a little money in an upgraded, competitive website. And if it’s more snappy or more nimble, that’s what the young people want; they want something that’s quick, easy to use, seasonally it changes, right? So, you could have your quarterly seasonal summer, fall, spring, etc., and seasonally, things do change, events in town change, monthly, and adding on the nimbleness I think is well worth the money. So, that’s my two cents. Director Khambata said yeah, I would agree. I think for my vote, I would go Option 3 because, again, we’ve got some cost of making the migration anyway. We might as well have the website we want, rather than just copying and pasting, and we’ve already identified some shortcomings in our current design. So, I think if we’re going to go that far, we might as well just get the full package; and like you said, advertising it out over the next 3-or-5 years, I think it makes sense. Additionally, if our current platform is slow and clunky to use, there’s an opportunity cost we’re missing out on, updating the calendar and adding a last-minute event, or whatever. So, there are some costs that are hard to quantify with staying with our current setup, and so, I think we have to consider that as well. Lastly, every time we have a meeting like this, I count how many people are in the room, and it’s like our meeting today has accounted for like 22 manhours, right? So every time we ask staff to do something and you have to put somebody on that, you know, that’s a 3-hour, 5-hour, 8-hour manhour task. By having a platform that’s easier and more functional, it’s going to save time in the long run, and we’re going to recoup that, whether it’s the City or the Bureau directly, we’re going to recoup that one way or the other over time. Director Olson said my last super-quick comment is if it’s a 3-foot putt, and we’ve already got 1-foot solved; we just saved $4,000 with the books, right? So, I mean, a third of it’s right here and that’s a lot of money, $4,000. Director Reese asked do we, I think I heard we can get some reporting on ours. Do we have a, can we get an idea of who’s going to our website just by demographics? Phil replied yes, we definitely can. Director Reese asked and then, when looking at doing a full relaunch of this, do we have an idea of how long it would take; and is there any event that we could do that relaunch around, whether it’s the Food Truck Festival or the Holiday Train, or whatever, where we can? Chairman Olsen replied we’ve got to do the RFP first. Director Reese said well, I know, but I’m just throwing out, you know, what’s going to be the length of time? So we don’t just say, okay, well, on February 12th, we’re going to do a relaunch, and that’s like big deal. Chairman Olsen said yes, strategically, how are you going to frame it? Phil replied and I can tell you right now, while a much different-sized beast, the cottagegrovemn.gov website is in the middle of an update right now, and that will take about until late summer or September to complete. So, it does take time, and then there is obviously quotes we’ve got to get, and so on and so forth. So, in terms of timing, you can bet at least a few months. Chairman Olsen said good. Any other feedback? Director Olson said one question, it might not be doable or appropriate, whatever, the website; if we become more nimble and snappy, is there an opportunity, seasonally maybe, to add advertising as a revenue source? I don't know if that’s a taboo subject, it’s just an idea and a question, I’m naïve. Phil replied I will admit, Director Olson, I am as well. I don't know the answer to that. Director Olson said let’s just say a restaurant in town wants to throw some money at us, but of course, they get a nice pop-up ad in the summer or in the winter, what have you, maybe the Cottage Grove Ice Arena, I’m just spitballing. Maybe the Lions, maybe the Lions want a pop-up ad because we have an event. Phil replied in addition to the question of can we or can’t we, which I don’t know the answer to and I’d be happy to follow up on that, there is still a question of website user experience; people hate ads, and that’s not necessarily a reason to do them or not do them, because certainly there’s a cost to them and there’s a value to them. Director Olson said that’s why I’m asking, I’m naïve to it. Chairman Olsen said one website had so doggone many ads on it, yeah. Director Olson said I’m very naïve to it, I just think, you know. Chairman Olsen said it’s a fair question. Phil replied for sure and in terms of the can we, it’s definitely a fair question that we can follow up on. City of Cottage Grove Convention and Visitors Bureau June 3, 2025 Page 13 of 13 Director Grecula said I think there’s a tasteful way, too, like if you want to go to a museum, and you click like recommended places to eat, I’ve always assumed those restaurants are paying the museum to be on their recommended. Member of the board said and tasteful is a good word for it. Board member said just having a page like that, instead of pop-ups, you know; it’s nothing against pop-ups. Chairman Olsen said but a sponsored ad, I mean, you see it on Amazon all the time. Director Levine said well, I’ll say as far as the timing of this, I think it’s fantastic. I’ll say we, as a Chamber, do a website refresh every 3 years; it’s with our agreement with our Chamber master platform. So, and this one we’ve had more than 3 years, right? We’ve had it since the start, so I think it’s a great idea. And the other thing, as far as the ads, on ours we just do the banner ads, which is the one on each page, but we have incorporated with our sponsorships; we have added you can have 90 days worth of your banner ad or whatever, and that is fantastic, people love that. So, if you’re looking at different sponsorships for food trucks and things like that, I’ll say some of our companies like that more than anything, and they provide the ad; you know, we give them dimensions, you provide the ad, and you get 3 months or 6 months, whatever that case may be of your ad on there in the banner ad, and it goes a long way. So, something for us to think about as we’re building out sponsorships, we can review that. Chairman Olsen said this is just dialogue, but good and fair questions to ask ourselves. He said it feels like the consensus is Option 3, am I wrong? Are you guys comfortable with that? All Directors indicated they were. Chairman Olsen asked is there anything else that you need from us today? Phil replied no. Chairman Olsen said all right. With that, I’ll seek a motion to adjourn. 9. CVB COMMENTS - None. 10. ADJOURNMENT Director Olson made a motion to adjourn; the motion was seconded by Director Hotvett. Motion carried: 6-0 (Director Khambata left at 8:45 a.m.) The meeting was adjourned at 8:48 a.m. Respectfully submitted, _______________________________________ Phil Jents, Communications Manager /jag 1 City Council Action Request 7.B. Meeting Date 9/17/2025 Department Parks and Recreation Agenda Category Action Item Title Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Meeting Minutes (2025- 06-09) Staff Recommendation Approve the June 9, 2025, Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Minutes. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. June Minutes City of Cottage Grove Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Meeting June 9, 2025 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a Cottage Grove Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Meeting was held on June 9, 2025. I. CALL TO ORDER & READING OF MISSION & Pledge of Allegiance Meeting called to order at 7:00pm at Peter Thompson Park II. Roll Call Members Present: Susannah Brown, Kelly Glasford, Debra Gustafson, Adam Larson, David Olson, Shane Waterman, Justin Waterman Members Absent: Samanthia Crabtree Others Present: Zac Dockter Parks & Recreation Director & Council Liaison Dave Clausen Approval of Agenda A Motion to approve agenda made by Commissioner Brown & seconded by Commissioner S. Waterman. Agenda approved. III. Approval of Minutes A Motion to approve minutes from May 12, 2025. Motion made by Commissioner Glasford & seconded by Commissioner Olson. Minutes approved. IV. Open Forum-None V. Presentations-None VI. Action Items a. Peterson (Roger & Myra) Park Naming i. Director Zac Dockter presented his report on the third review of this park naming request for the future park area around what is currently known as Robert’s Lake. The Commission discussed whether it should be Roger & Myra Peterson Park vs. Peterson Park. Motion made by Commissioner Olson and seconded by Commissioner Brown to name the park Roger & Myra Peterson Park. Motion passed. b. Oltman Park Playground & Shelter Design i. Director Zac Dockter presented the preferred concepts for the future Oltman Park playground and picnic shelter designs. Dockter explained the playground was a more active and athletic design consideration and is a bit different to what we have in the community currently. However, it does offer a myriad of play opportunities for all ages. Staff believes this design will be a welcomed feature for the athletic families visiting the park, while also potentially becoming a resource for the adjacent middle school physical education programming. Motion was made by Commissioner J. Waterman and seconded by Commissioner Olson to approve the playground and shelter designs for Oltman Park as submitted in the report. Motion passed. VII. Presentation of Information-None VIII. Action Updates i. Director Zac Dockter presented updates for several projects including Denzer Park, Granada Park Parking Lot, CG Trailway Corridor Restoration, Oltman Park, Mississippi Dunes Park, and Kingston Park Building. IX. Donation and Acknowledgements-None X. Staff Reports & Educational Materials i. Washington County Parks Board Meeting Notes XI. Commission Comments i. Commissioner Olson verbally reported on the Advisory Commission for Historic Preservation’s study of Cottage Grove’s 1941-1990 suburban development program. Commissioner also noted there is potential interest in upgrading Cedarhurst Mansion by a private developer. XII. Council Comments i. Councilman Clausen updated the Commission on recent Council agendas. XIII. Adjournment- Motioned by Commissioner Olson. Seconded by Commissioner S Waterman. Meeting Adjourned at 7:30pm. 1 City Council Action Request 7.C. Meeting Date 9/17/2025 Department Public Works Agenda Category Action Item Title Public Services Commission Meeting Minutes (2025-07-21) Staff Recommendation Approve the July 21, 2025, Public Services Commission meeting Minutes. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. 7-21-2025 Public Service Commission Meeting MINUTES COTTAGE GROVE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION July 21, 2025 City Council Chamber 12800 Ravine Parkway South, Cottage Grove, Minnesota, 55016 1. CALL TO ORDER Chair Lisa Kons called the Public Service Commission meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Chair Kons asked everyone to stand and recite the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. ROLL CALL Chair Kons was advised that Roll Call had been taken. Absent: Vice Chair Ron Kath, Ryan Burfeind, Jon Pritchard. 4. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA Commissioner Kelsey Moyer made a motion to approve the agenda; Commissioner Jenny Olson seconded. Motion carried: 6-0. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. APPROVE MINUTES FROM THE MAY 19, 2025 MEETING Motion by Commissioner Olson to approve the May 19, 2025 meeting minutes; Commissioner Tracy Jenson seconded. Motion carried: 6-0. 6. OPEN FORUM Chair Kons said open forum is a process for anyone in the audience who wishes to speak to the commission may do so at this time. No one spoke. Chair Kons closed the open forum. 7. PRESENTATIONS A. E-BIKES AND SCOOTERS Captain Brad Petersen said there’s no fancy PowerPoint presentation tonight, I’m hoping this can be more of an open-forum discussion so I can get your perspective on E-Bikes and Scooters. I’m trusting that you’ve had some conversations with the community because I know it’s a hot topic. So, really what we’re trying to do by getting this on your agenda and getting your feedback tonight is just start the dialogue and recognize and acknowledge that this could potentially be problematic, and it’s certainly an area of concern with our citizens. We want to get out ahead of that, start the dialogue, and just make sure that we’re approaching this in a common-sense manner with safety in mind for everybody who uses our sidewalks, trails, walkways and that we’re not having avoidable crashes and injuries and things like that. So, I want to get your input on it, and then also, I can try to answer some questions if you have questions about what constitutes a scooter vs. an E-Bike vs. a minibike, things like that. To be completely honest, it’s super confusing, and I spent way too many hours trying to digest this and put this in a very readable Public Service Commission Meeting document, both for your benefit as well as our officers and the public. So, this last month we’ve been educating our officers so they can be as understanding as possible; Phase 2 is starting to educate the public, so we’re starting to make some stops in the public. Enforcement is not the goal at this point, we’re not trying to write tickets to kids, we’re just trying to educate the riders and parents so that they can make informed decisions and keep safety forefront in their mind. We’re starting to launch this Ride Safe campaign, educating through social media and other means, presentations in public, enforcement stops. We’re working on some incentive programs to help incentivize safe riding habits and wear of safety gear, things like that. So, I guess before I get too far into this, I’ll pause for a minute and just ask where you’d like to see this conversation go and see if you have any comments or questions to help guide this discussion. Public Service Commission Meeting don’t see any on a bicycle. But if you get hit, it’s who has the Right-of-Way and who doesn’t. And in a situation like that, you both have to yield to each other. Public Service Commission Meeting spend addressing those issues and being proactive before things do happen because they’re far more likely to happen when you’ve got those speeds. So, I think that’s kind of something we really need to ask ourselves, like what are our resources to invest in addressing it proactively? Public Service Commission Meeting out, and probably nearly impossible for the public to figure it out if you don’t have that law enforcement background or a Statute book in front of you. 8. BUSINESS ITEMS - None. 9. COMMISSION COMMENTS - None. 10. STAFF REPORTS AND MATERIALS Public Service Commission Meeting Captain Petersen said so, there’s a lot more good stuff in there. Feel free to read through that, and reach out to me anytime if you have questions with that. 11. COUNCIL COMMENTS A. Council Agendas Public Service Commission Meeting Gary replied so, the 80th Street one is where they’re doing the boring, so there will be a pit on either side of that; that’s supposed to start sometime this week. For 70th Street, because of the rock underneath, they have to do an open cut, so that’s the reason its going to be shut down for two weeks. 12. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Rediske made a motion to adjourn the meeting; Commissioner Olson seconded. Motion passed unanimously (6-to 0 vote). The meeting at 7:31 p.m. 1 City Council Action Request 7.D. Meeting Date 9/17/2025 Department Administration Agenda Category Action Item Title Closed Special Meeting Minutes (2025-08-20) Staff Recommendation Approve the August 20, 2025, Closed Special Meeting Minutes. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. 2025-08-20 City Council Meeting (Closed) CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE 12800 Ravine Parkway Cottage Grove, Minnesota 55016 www.cottagegrovemn.gov 651-458-2800 Fax 651-458-2897 Equal Opportunity Employer MINUTES COTTAGE GROVE CITY COUNCIL August 20, 2025 COUNCIL CHAMBER 12800 RAVINE PARKWAY SOUTH SPECIAL MEETING (CLOSED) – 6:00 P.M St Croix Room 1 City Council Action Request 7.E. Meeting Date 9/17/2025 Department Administration Agenda Category Action Item Title City Council Regular Meeting Minutes (2025-08-20) Staff Recommendation Approve the August 20, 2025, City Council Regular Meeting Minutes. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. 2025-08-20 City Council Meeting CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE 12800 Ravine Parkway Cottage Grove, Minnesota 55016 www.cottagegrovemn.gov 651-458-2800 Fax 651-458-2897 Equal Opportunity Employer COTTAGE GROVE CITY COUNCIL August 20, 2025 12800 RAVINE PARKWAY SOUTH COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 COUNCIL CHAMBER - 7:00 P.M 1. CALL TO ORDER The City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, Washington County, Minnesota, held a regular meeting on August 20, 2025, at Cottage Grove City Hall, 12800 Ravine Parkway. Mayor Bailey called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and said this meeting is being recorded by TruLens Community Media. You can view City meetings live and then replay them on Cable Channel 799, and meetings are also streamed live and archived on the City of Cottage Grove’s YouTube channel. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The audience, staff, and City Council Members stood and recited the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. ROLL CALL Tammy Anderson, City Clerk, called the roll: Mayor Bailey-Here; Council Member Clausen-Absent; Council Member Garza-Here; Council Member Olsen-Here; Council Member Thiede-Here. Also present: Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator; Ryan Burfeind, Public Works Director; Zac Dockter, Parks and Recreation Director; Paul Sponholz, Engineer; Pete Koerner, Public Safety Director; Korine Land, City Attorney- LeVander, Gillen & Miller, PA; Brenda Malinowski, Finance Director; Emily Schmitz, Community Development Director; Sam Pierret, Senior Planner; Kelly Becker, Associate Planner; Phil Jents, Communication Manager. 4. OPEN FORUM Mayor Bailey opened the Open Forum. As no one wished to address the Council, Mayor Bailey closed Open Forum. 5. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Motion by Council Member Garza to adopt the agenda; second by Council Member Olsen. Motion carried: 4-0. 6. PRESENTATIONS - None. 7. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve the July 16, 2025 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes. B. Accept and place on file the minutes from the May 19, 2025 Planning Commission Meeting. C. Authorize issuance of a Massage Therapist License to Mary Denise Seifert to work at The Healing Place (8617 West Point Douglas Road South). D. Receive the response to the City Council Open Forum inquiry on August 6, 2025. E. Approve the issuance of rental licenses to the properties listed in the attached table. F. Approve the 2nd Amendment to the Amended and Restated Site Lease Agreement with AT&T at the City Council Meeting August 20, 2025 Page 2 of 22 Pinehill Water Tower Site. G. Adopt Resolution 2025-115 authorizing preparation of Plans and Specifications for the 80th Street (TH61 to Ideal Avenue), East Point Douglas Road (80th Street south to T-intersection), and TH61/80th Street Interchange Rehabilitation Project. H. Approve the two Permanent and three Temporary Easements along Lamar Avenue. I. Approve the Encroachment Agreement for Almar Village Parking and appropriate officials are hereby authorized to sign the Encroachment Agreement to effectuate this action. J. Approve Change Order No. 1 to adjust the project substantial and final completion dates to October 17, 2025 and November 7, 2025, respectively. K. Authorize staff to place the order for the Salt Spreader Controls for a total of $208,000 from Towmaster Truck Equipment. L. Approve Resolution 2025-117, Declaring the official intent to bond for the Oltman Park Project. M. Approve the Agreement with Intrepid Fiber. Council Member Garza wished to pull Item C, Massage Therapist License-Mary Denise Seifert, for further discussion and/or approval. She stated that’s not what she wished to speak on, it was the paraphernalia. Mayor Bailey advised her that was C on the Regular Agenda tonight so she could speak on that item later on in this meeting. Motion by Council Member Olsen to approve the Consent Agenda; second by Council Member Thiede. Motion carried: 4-0. 8. APPROVE DISBURSEMENTS Staff Recommendation: Approve disbursements from 08-01-2025 to 08-14-2025 in the amount of $3,719,117.56. Motion by Council Member Olsen to approve disbursements; second by Council Member Garza. Motion carried: 4-0. 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Public Hearing for Issuance of Conduit Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds-Real Estate Equities, LLC Staff Recommendation: 1) Hold a Public Hearing on the Housing Program, the Bonds, and the Interim Loan. 2) Adopt Resolution 2025-118, Adopting the Housing Program, approving a Public Hearing, authorizing an Interim Loan, and the issuance of a taxable Interim Note for a multifamily housing development, and approving and authorizing execution of documents. Mayor Bailey said Brenda Malinowski, our Finance Director, will kick this off and she has a guest who’s joining us this evening. Director Malinowski replied I do, Mayor and Members of the Council, just very quickly, tonight you’ll be doing the Public Hearing for the issuance of the conduit debt, the first piece of that; our bond attorney law firm is Taft Law Firm and here tonight to step you through the process is Rhonda Skoby with Taft Law Firm. So, I’ll turn it over to her. Mayor Bailey welcomed Attorney Skoby. Thank you, Mayor, Council Members. My name is Rhonda Skoby, and I am a bond attorney and partner at Taft Law Firm. We represent the City in this proposed bond financing. The Public Hearing and Motion before you tonight for consideration relates to the proposed conduit bond issuance for a workforce housing project to be City Council Meeting August 20, 2025 Page 3 of 22 located at the intersection of Hadley Avenue and 100th Street in the City; the project will be known as Hadley Ridge Apartments. As this Council is aware, conduit bonds are authorized by State and Federal law and the Federal Tax Code in order to help developers of multifamily housing and certain other projects borrow money at tax- exempt rates. If the Council approves the bonds, the bonds will be the obligation only of the borrower; the borrower in this instance is Cottage Grove AH1LLLP, which is an affiliate of Real Estate Equities, LLC. The City will have no financial obligation for the bonds, and all costs of the City will be paid by the borrower. The borrower will also pay an administrative fee to the City for the issuance of the bonds. 10. BID AWARDS - None. 11. REGULAR AGENDA A. 61 Marine & Sports - Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review Staff Recommendation: 1) Adopt Resolution 2025-110 approving a Conditional Use Permit for the display, hire, service, rental, leasing, and/or sales of boats and recreational vehicles conducted outside a building, with servicing conducted within a building at 61 Marine & City Council Meeting August 20, 2025 Page 4 of 22 Sports, 11730 Point Douglas Drive South. 2) Adopt Resolution 2025-111 approving a Site Plan Mayor Bailey said Samantha, our Senior Planner, is going to walk us through this one, so welcome. Samantha Pierret, Senior Planner, said thank you, Good Evening, Mayor and Members of the Council, tonight I am bringing forward to you a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and Site Plan Review request from 61 Marine & Sports, located at 11730 Point Douglas Drive South, on approximately 11.97 acres of B-3 Zoned property. A little background for everybody: The use here, which is the boats and recreational vehicles sales and service, was a legal nonconformity and has been since 1984; there were several permit approvals, Conditional Use Permit approvals between 1984 and 2015. In 2015, all of those previous approvals were rescinded, and a new CUP, Site Plan, and minor subdivision were approved for expansion of the business. Between 2018 and 2021, additional Site Plans and CUPs were approved, as the business continued to expand onto neighboring properties. In 2022, the Zoning classification was changed to B-3, where the use for recreational vehicle and boat sales and service conducted inside a building is now a conditional use. So, now is the time with the applicant proposing to expand their building with a 50’ x 80’ addition on the east side of an existing building, now is the time for them to also apply for that CUP to comply with our ordinances instead of doing another CUP to expand a nonconforming use. So, we’re just getting in line with the ordinances here and everything like that. The addition must be made of matching materials to the existing building that is out there now, which was a condition for some of the other previous additions as well. There is no impervious surface being added here, as the addition is going to be constructed over existing gravel. There are three stormwater basins on site that currently are capable of handling the existing impervious surface. In 2019, the CUP condition was that some vegetation be planted within a 10’ setback along that east property line there; there is a condition for your consideration tonight that 11 coniferous trees be planted in the southeast corner of the property there, just as some additional screening from Highway 61 as you drive by there. For your consideration tonight, there are two resolutions on the table. Thank you. Mayor Bailey said all right, thank you, Samantha. He asked if Council had any questions; none were asked, and Mayor Bailey said I don’t see the applicant in the audience. Motion by Council Member Olsen to Adopt Resolution 2025-110 approving a Conditional Use Permit for the display, hire, service, rental, leasing, and/or sales of boats and recreational vehicles conducted outside a building, with servicing conducted within a building at 61 Marine & Sports, 11730 Point Douglas Drive South; second by Council Member Garza. Motion carried: 4-0. Motion by Council Member Thiede to Adopt Resolution 2025-111 approving a Site Plan Review to construct a 4,000 square-foot building addition for boat servicing at 61 Marine & Sports, 11730 Point Douglas Drive South; second by Council Member Olsen. Motion carried: 4-0. B. Cedarhurst - Historic Conditional Use Permits, Zoning Amendments, Site Plan Review, and Business Subsidy Agreement Staff Recommendation: 1) Adopt Ordinance No. 1103 to approve a Zoning Amendment to rezone City Council Meeting August 20, 2025 Page 5 of 22 Adopt Resolution 2025-114 to approve a Historical Conditional Use Permit to use the Gardener’s Cottage property, located at 9912 70th Street South, in conjunction with the commercial event/ wedding venue on the adjacent parcel at 6940 Keats Avenue South. 6) Approve the Business Subsidy Agreement with Bellagala to provide a business subsidy for $37,275.00 for up to 15 SAC units. Mayor Bailey said Emily Schmitz, our Community Development Director, is going to take us through this. Welcome, Emily. Director Schmitz replied Good Evening, Mayor and Council. Cedarhurst, or Bellagala, is the applicant. They have submitted several applications which I’ll go through in just a little bit more detail throughout the presentation. However, for those who may not know as they’re driving by at the corner of 70th and Keats, there is a historic Mansion tucked behind the vegetation, so, just to orient you as to where we are looking at for this beautiful Mansion in our community. So, a little bit of background: It was originally built in the 1860s, I’m not going to get into a lot of the historic details, but there are a lot out there, some great stories, so we’re looking forward to seeing this site and this building repurposed and utilized in the community. In the 1970s, it was approved as a catering business, and then later in the 2000s to host events as well; so, this is not a unique proposal as a use for this particular site. The current property owner purchased the property in 2021; if you recall, there was a proposal for that redevelopment of the site with some additional residential development as well as improving the Mansion. However, that project fell through; therefore, Bellagala is before you this evening looking for an opportunity to operate their wedding venue out of the Mansion. Bellagala is a company founded in Minnesota, they own and operate quite a few wedding venues throughout the Twin Cities metro areas. They are here this evening and can certainly offer you some additional details into their business ventures as well, but they are proposing a year- round wedding and event center at the Mansion, as well as the adjacent parcel we call the Gardener’s Cottage. So, to be clear, there are two buildings, two parcels involved in their request, both coming together to support those operations. How do we get there? The Land Use and the Zoning do have to come together to support us getting to a point where we can support and allow for that wedding event operation. Both of the parcels are currently zoned Agricultural; however, our Land Use Plan or our Comprehensive Plan does guide the parcel with the Mansion as an excuse and it guides the Gardener’s Cottage parcel as R-3, Low Density. When we have unique parcels, especially with the Mansion on the National Register of Historic Places and the Gardener’s Cottage, which we would hope someday will be on our Local Register, we find that using a Historic Conditional Use Permit (HCUP) allows us to be creative in the use to continue to maintain that historic integrity. So, it is a HCUP that will comply with both of those Zoning Districts, the R-3 District as well as the Mixed-Use District; we use the HCUP as a tool to allow for those unique operations to support those historic buildings and the integrity of those. So, the ask tonight is a HCUP on both separate parcels. Director Schmitz said so, I’ll go into just a high level of the restoration that is proposed for the Mansion and for the site. Most notably, they are proposing a 4,000 square-foot addition to the Mansion, which they are calling the Atrium, where they will host the majority of their events; ceremonies will take place outside, which I’ll get to a little bit later, but the Atrium will be the most notable improvement on the site. I’ve also included some images for the public to be sure that they’re aware of the current status of the interior of the Mansion and the fact that it has sat vacant for quite some time. The improvements will be intense, but the applicant is committed to meeting those standards; they are working towards Historic Tax Credits with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), which requires them to align with certain standards at the State level and maintain that historic integrity. So, even as you see the deterioration, this applicant is committed to making those improvements. It’s also important to note that they are committed to removing a couple of outbuildings on the site and will work to preserve as much as they possibly can; of course, we want to be certain that they’re preserving the safety of the folks who are going to be using the site, so several of the buildings will be removed as a part of their improvements to the site as a whole: The barn, this is an outdated photo, as that barn actually now has fallen over, and then a couple of these other buildings that just cannot be saved. City Council Meeting August 20, 2025 Page 6 of 22 The applicant is proposing a couple of different outdoor ceremony spaces, which I think is important to recognize. I’ve got some additional details on the Rose Garden, but as you’ll notice 5 and 1 are also proposed outdoor ceremony spaces; again, just the ceremony, but the dance and the reception will all take place indoors, in the Atrium. City Council Meeting August 20, 2025 Page 7 of 22 Again, their focus was to limit the impervious that they were adding to the site; however, for the impervious that that they are adding, they do need to find a way to treat and manage that stormwater on site, which they are doing with a small basin and flow through and off the site appropriately. City Council Meeting August 20, 2025 Page 8 of 22 organic pollutions that we’re going to be creating, that it’s not going to really go into any of the adjacent neighborhoods, which is awesome. So, this is just a different view of it; obviously, you’ll see the glass structure. Our goal is to make that Rose Garden as beautiful as possible. Our designer, Ed, and the owner of the company, Tim, not me, unfortunately, but Tim has been working with Ed for decades. He’s helped create some of our best of our six locations statewide, and it’s his design, it’s his willingness to kind of lean into the history, to lean into the true aesthetic of what this thing was 100+ years ago. City Council Meeting August 20, 2025 Page 9 of 22 can move forward in the manner that you have planned, this really is going to become another jewel in the crown here of Cottage Grove, as it was for many, many years way back when. City Council Meeting August 20, 2025 Page 10 of 22 Motion by Council Member Garza to Approve the Business Subsidy Agreement with Bellagala to provide a business subsidy for $37,275.00 for up to 15 SAC units; second by Council Member Olsen. Motion carried: 4-0. C. Ordinance Amendment, City Code 5-1-3 (Paraphernalia Definitions) Staff Recommendation: Provide direction on the Ordinance Amendment. We do allow tobacco devices in tobacco stores; tobacco devices are known as a device that is intentionally used, designed, or intended for the chewing, sniffing, smoking, or other consumption, whether by inhalation, aerosol or vapor, or ingestion of tobacco or tobacco products. Again, it seems like it makes sense, commonsense definition. City Council Meeting August 20, 2025 Page 11 of 22 So, who else can sell it? They didn’t have an answer to that question, and so they felt like it was an interpretation question that each local government could decide for themselves because it is a vague area in the law, it doesn’t say that anyone can sell cannabis paraphernalia. So, that’s why we’re posing the question to you; there has been an application to make an ordinance amendment to allow cannabis paraphernalia to be sold at tobacco shops, that is the specific request that was made. But I pose to you that you actually have three options: Drug paraphernalia shall mean all equipment, products, and materials of any kind which are used, intended for use, or designed for use in planting, propagating, cultivating, growing, harvesting, manufacturing, compounding, converting, producing, processing, comparing, testing, analyzing, packaging, etc., etc. So, there’s just a whole list of things, which I see there, which I say is different than what I’m seeing here in a sense. City Council Meeting August 20, 2025 Page 12 of 22 Council Member Olsen said so that being said, if we look at the options that you presented, B would put us more in line with what the State is sort of guiding, I’m not going to say that they’re doing a good job of guiding it, but they’re sort of guiding it. Is that accurate? City Council Meeting August 20, 2025 Page 13 of 22 Council Member Garza asked so they don’t sell any like tobacco pipes or anything? City Council Meeting August 20, 2025 Page 14 of 22 a city to the north of us doesn’t even have an ordinance, and all their people are selling it in the tobacco stores. The fact right now that we’ve had two tobacco stores that actually reached out to us, asking for this, and the fact that a city to the north of us doesn’t even have anything about it, but they’re still selling it, I think it’s better to do it legally from an ordinance standpoint and go from there. I’m also not against somewhere in the future looking at, you know, what if this evolves, because this has been evolving even yet this year with what’s gong on at the State level, that that might be something that we want to entertain. Of course, as a Council, we can always do that, right? 12. COUNCIL COMMENTS AND REQUESTS City Council Meeting August 20, 2025 Page 15 of 22 $5 if you buy your ticket through the app; so, it’s a great way to save a little money. And with that, Mayor, I’ll turn it back to you. Moana 2. But at any rate, Movies with Mo is tomorrow, at Highlands Park, at 7:00 p.m. Council Member Garza said there’s free popcorn, free lemonade, and free glow sticks. Council Member Thiede said holy cow, you can’t beat that. Council Member Garza said the movie starts at dusk. Council Member Thiede said so, I think you’ll want to go. Council Member Garza said yeah, it’s the last one of the season. 13. WORKSHOPS - OPEN TO PUBLIC - TRAINING ROOM 2026-2027 Budget Workshop Staff Recommendation: Provide feedback regarding 2025 Property Tax Levy and Budget Communications. City Council Meeting August 20, 2025 Page 16 of 22 Director Malinowski said so, I have a very quick presentation and then I’ll open it up to you for discussion and direction. We got the property values from the County, and really got even more favorable values than we got in July. We got multiple taxable dollars, which is what we use when we calculated our property tax rate; it went up, which is moving our property tax rate down, so that’s great news we got from the County. City Council Meeting August 20, 2025 Page 17 of 22 the end of 2026, we’re at $723,000, and we do still have $900,000 in Equipment in 2027 that we’re going to have to find additional funds for; maybe there is some opportunity at the end of this year to fund some of that in 2027 with the budget carry forward and something like that. We don’t have to solve that today, but at least we’ve solved 2026, and we’re in a great position in 2027. City Council Meeting August 20, 2025 Page 18 of 22 like. So, some drafted language for the website or social media posts, and a rough outline for what those videos might look like; obviously, all of that is subject to change as things move forward. Cottage Grove Reports, social media, Cottage Grove Connect. One thing that is in the slides but isn’t on the bullet points is a virtual community event, probably like a virtual Town Hall that we were kicking around doing about the budget. Social Media City Council Meeting August 20, 2025 Page 19 of 22 context, Cottage Grove rank amongst all of our neighbors, our East Metro neighbors here in this neck of the woods. We don’t have copy yet drafted for that post, because I don’t know where we land, right? So, it’s hard to draft a post not knowing exactly what that information is, but I think you all have talked about or seen similar information from past budget years, so I think you get the intent behind what that post would be. Videos City Council Meeting August 20, 2025 Page 20 of 22 City Council Meeting August 20, 2025 Page 21 of 22 terms of how does that affect your living; and some people are going to say, oh, yeah, I’m willing to pay what, 23% or 31%, to pay for certain things, uh, they’re going to say, I don’t like it, and 31% are going to say no, I don’t, and 15% are saying well, I don’t need that so I’d rather have my taxes go down. I guess my one comment for the record, but a few years ago, a couple years ago, we created a Financial Management Plan, and we created that to, you know, to give us guidance; and hopefully, it helped with our AAA Bond Rating, you know, because it says hey, we’ve got a plan, right? But, you know, and I commend Administration for coming in and saying okay, here’s where it is, we’re not in alignment with the plan; but if we keep throwing the FMP out the window, I would say, you know, being 50% higher than the FMP, I would say anything with the work that or Council, if you’d say plus or minus 10, 15, I think we ask, we literally ask where is it, do we need to do something beyond that, we have to do it. If we can’t, you know, really plan, model our plan to that FMP, then we should rely on the financial plan and, you know, and maybe go with something different. You know, I just have a hard time with not buying into this with my cooperative background. This is the whole reason why we make financial plans. So, but what you did is great, you know, with all those types of communication. City Council Meeting August 20, 2025 Page 22 of 22 challenge is how do you grab people’s attention? I mean, it’s not a sexy subject matter, so, I mean, you can only do the best you can do, and I think you guys have done a really nice job. 14. WORKSHOPS - CLOSED TO PUBLIC - None. 15. ADJOURNMENT 1 City Council Action Request 7.F. Meeting Date 9/17/2025 Department Community Development Agenda Category Action Item Title Rental License Approvals Staff Recommendation Approve the issuance of rental licenses to the properties listed in the attached table. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. Rental License Approvals CC Memo 2. Rental License Approvals Table TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator FROM: Samantha Drewry, Code Enforcement Officer DATE: September 11, 2025 RE: Rental License Approvals Background/Discussion Rental licenses are required for nonowner-occupied residential properties (City Code Title 9-13, Property Maintenance, and Title 9 -14, Rental Licensing) and are issued on a biennial basis. The licensing process includes submittal of the rental license application, payment of the rental license fee, and public criminal history report. Rental inspections are conducted on all rental properties as part of the licensing process. Once all information has been submitted and the inspection satisfactorily completed, the Council must approve the license prior to it being issued. The properties listed in the attached table have completed the licensing process and are ready to have their licenses issued following Council approval. Recommendation Approve the issuance of rental licenses to the properties listed in the attached table. 2025 RENTAL LICENSES CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL - SEPTEMBER 17, 2025 RENTAL LICENSE NUMBER PROPERTY STREET #PROPERTY STREET NAME PROPERTY OWNER RENT-001563 9319 93rd Street South Gary Vanderbush, Pathlight Mgmt RENT-002677 9600 79th Street South SFR Borrower 2021-2 LLC RENT-002848 6834 Meadow Grass Lane South Josey George 1 City Council Action Request 7.G. Meeting Date 9/17/2025 Department Administration Agenda Category Action Item Title Ordinance Amendments Allowing Cannabis Paraphernalia Staff Recommendation Adopt Ordinance 2025-1102 allowing the sale of cannabis paraphernalia in tobacco stores and cannabis-related retail stores. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. Memo to Council re. Paraphernalia Ord Amdmt 9-17-25 2. Drug Paraphernalia and Tobacco Ordinance Amendment 9-17-25 3. Drug Paraphernalia and Tobacco Ordinance Amendment 9-17-25 (clean) To: From: Date: Subject: 1 2 and restricts the use, possession or transport of Cannabis Paraphernalia to anyone who is 21 and older.3 1 Minn. Stat. § 342.01 Subd. 18 2 Minn. Stat. § 342.27, Subd. 3 3 Minn. Stat. § 342.09 Subd. 1(a)(1) where such products can be sold.4 The Council provided specific direction at the August 20, 2025 meeting on this location issue and recommended that the sale of cannabis paraphernalia be limited to tobacco stores. In order to differentiate a “tobacco store” from any business with a tobacco license (i.e. gas stations), we have defined tobacco stores for this purpose only as those that have more than 50% of their gross sales from tobacco products. only retailers that can sell these products. cannabis paraphernalia to the list of products: “tobacco, tobacco product, tobacco related device or cannabis paraphernalia” cannabis paraphernalia to the list of products: “cannabis or lower potency hemp edible product or cannabis paraphernalia” 4 The Office of Cannabis Management admits that other locations for sales is a subject for local government to decide. 3. Amendment to Drug Paraphernalia Ordinance a. Add several definitions b. Add a section clarifying that sales of cannabis paraphernalia are allowed at cannabis retail, lower potency hemp edible retail and a licensed tobacco retailer that meet the requirements of the Tobacco Ordinance. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Ordinance No. 2025-1102. ATTACHMENT: Ordinance No. 2025-1102 1 ORDINANCE NO. 1102 the owner of the tobacco stores CG Smoke Shop and MoonSoon Tobacco submitted an application to amend the Cottage Grove City Code to permit the sale of cannabis paraphernalia at tobacco stores; and WHEREAS, Section 5-1-3 in Chapter 1 of Title 5 of the City Code regulates the possession, manufacture, advertisement, and delivery of “drug paraphernalia,” which could potentially apply to cannabis paraphernalia; and WHEREAS, it is legal to use, possess, or transport cannabis paraphernalia, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 342.09, subd. 1(a)(1); and WHEREAS, State law allows for the possession of cannabis paraphernalia but does not specifically identify where such products can be sold; and , the City Council has investigated and finds it is appropriate to amend the definition of “drug paraphernalia” in Section 5-1-3 of the City Code to exclude cannabis paraphernalia from any interpretation of its definition and to be explicitly consistent with the definition of “drug paraphernalia” in Minnesota Statutes Section 152.01, subd. 18; and the City Council further finds that it is fulfills a public purpose to allow cannabis paraphernalia to be sold at tobacco stores that have more than 50% of gross sales of tobacco and tobacco products, as well as to clarify that they can be sold at cannabis retail stores and at lower-potency hemp edible retail stores as these businesses will ensure the products are being sold to age-appropriate customers, as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, Washington County, Minnesota, does hereby ordain as follows: . The Code of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, Title 3, Chapter 5, Section 3-5-3 regarding Tobacco Definitions shall be amended by adding the following definition (text to be deleted shown with a struck through and new text shown as underlined): CANNABIS PARAPHERNALIA: All equipment, products, and materials of any kind that are knowingly or intentionally used primarily in: (1) manufacturing cannabis products; (2) ingesting, inhaling, or otherwise introducing cannabis flower or cannabis products into the human body; and (3) testing the strength, effectiveness, or purity of cannabis flower, cannabis products, lower-potency hemp edibles, or hemp-derived consumer products. 2 SECTION 2. AMENDMENT. The Code of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, Title 3, Chapter 5, Section 3-5-6 regarding Tobacco Conditions of License shall be amended as follows (text to be deleted shown with a struck through and new text shown as underlined): § 3-5-6: CONDITIONS OF LICENSE: 3 device or cannabis paraphernalia between the licensee or their employee and the customer. SECTION 3. AMENDMENT. The Code of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, Title 3, Chapter 5, Section 3-5-8 Tobacco Prohibited Acts shall be amended as follows (text to be deleted shown with a struck through and new text shown as underlined): § 3-5-8: PROHIBITED ACTS: 4 A. Illegal Sales: For any person to sell, give, or otherwise provide any tobacco, tobacco product, or tobacco-related device or cannabis paraphernalia to any person under twenty- one (21). SECTION 4. AMENDMENT. The Code of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, Title 3, Chapter 13, Section 3-13-2 regarding Cannabis and Lower-Potency Hemp Edible Business Definitions shall be amended as follows (text to be deleted shown with a struck through and new text shown as underlined): § 3-13-2: DEFINITIONS: CANNABIS EVENT: A temporary event organized by a Cannabis Event Organizer at which cannabis or lower-potency hemp edible products are displayed or sold by vendors. 5 Such cannabis event may be comprised solely of cannabis and lower-potency hemp edible vendors or may be part of a larger event at which cannabis and lower-potency hemp edible vendors intend to participate. CANNABIS PARAPHERNALIA: All equipment, products, and materials of any kind that are knowingly or intentionally used primarily in: (1) manufacturing cannabis products; (2) ingesting, inhaling, or otherwise introducing cannabis flower or cannabis products into the human body; and (3) testing the strength, effectiveness, or purity of cannabis flower, cannabis products, lower-potency hemp edibles, or hemp-derived consumer products. OFFICE OF CANNABIS MANAGEMENT or OCM: Minnesota Office of Cannabis Management. STATE LICENSE: An approved license issued by the Minnesota Office of Cannabis Management to a cannabis or lower-potency hemp edible business. SECTION 5. AMENDMENT. The Code of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, Title 3, Chapter 13, Section 3-13-13 regarding Cannabis and Lower Ptoentcy Hemp Edible Business Prohibited Acts shall be amended as follows (text to be deleted shown with a struck through and new text shown as underlined): § 3-13-13: PROHIBITED ACTS: 6 in order to purchase any cannabis or lower-potency hemp edible product or cannabis paraphernalia. SECTION 6. AMENDMENT. The Code of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, Title 5, Chapter 1, Section 5-1-3 B. Drug Paraphernalia Definitions shall be amended as follows (text to be deleted shown with a struck through and new text shown as underlined): § 5-1-3: DRUG PARAPHERNALIA CANNABIS PARAPHERNALIA: All equipment, products, and materials of any kind that are knowingly or intentionally used primarily in: (1) manufacturing cannabis products; (2) ingesting, inhaling, or otherwise introducing cannabis flower or cannabis products into the human body; and (3) testing the strength, effectiveness, or purity of cannabis flower, cannabis products, lower-potency hemp edibles, or hemp-derived consumer products. 7 CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE: A drug, substance, or immediate precursor in Schedules I through V of Minnesota Statutes Section 152.02, as amended. The term shall not include distilled spirits, wine, malt beverages, intoxicating liquors or tobacco. DRUG PARAPHERNALIA: (1) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b), “drug paraphernalia” means all equipment, products, and materials of any kind, except those items used in conjunction with permitted uses of controlled substances under this chapter or the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, which are knowingly or intentionally used primarily in (1) manufacturing a controlled substance, (2) injecting, ingesting, inhaling, or otherwise introducing into the human body a controlled substance, or (3) enhancing the effect of a controlled substance. (b) “Drug paraphernalia” does not include the possession, manufacture, delivery, or sale of: (1) hypodermic syringes or needles or any instrument or implement which can be adapted for subcutaneous injections; (2) products that detect the presence of fentanyl or a fentanyl analog in a controlled substance; or (3) cannabis paraphernalia. F. Sales of cannabis paraphernalia shall only be allowed at registered cannabis retail establishments, registered lower-potency hemp edible retail establishments (not including on- and off-sale liquor) and at licensed tobacco establishments that meet the requirements in City Code Section 3-5-6 E. SECTION 7. SUMMARY PUBLICATION. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 412.191, in the case of a lengthy ordinance, a summary may be published. While a copy of the entire ordinance is available without cost at the office of the City Clerk, the following summary is approved by the City Council and shall be published in lieu of publishing the entire ordinance. This amendment is to amend the definition of drug paraphernalia in Section 5-1-3 of the City Code to be consistent with the definition in Minnesota law. SECTION 8. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to law. Passed this day of , 2025 Myron Bailey, Mayor Attest: Tamara Anderson, City Clerk Published in the St. Paul Pioneer Press on _______________________. 1 ORDINANCE NO. 1102 the owner of the tobacco stores CG Smoke Shop and MoonSoon Tobacco submitted an application to amend the Cottage Grove City Code to permit the sale of cannabis paraphernalia at tobacco stores; and WHEREAS, Section 5-1-3 in Chapter 1 of Title 5 of the City Code regulates the possession, manufacture, advertisement, and delivery of “drug paraphernalia,” which could potentially apply to cannabis paraphernalia; and WHEREAS, it is legal to use, possess, or transport cannabis paraphernalia, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 342.09, subd. 1(a)(1); and WHEREAS, State law allows for the possession of cannabis paraphernalia but does not specifically identify where such products can be sold; and , the City Council has investigated and finds it is appropriate to amend the definition of “drug paraphernalia” in Section 5-1-3 of the City Code to exclude cannabis paraphernalia from any interpretation of its definition and to be explicitly consistent with the definition of “drug paraphernalia” in Minnesota Statutes Section 152.01, subd. 18; and the City Council further finds that it is fulfills a public purpose to allow cannabis paraphernalia to be sold at tobacco stores that have more than 50% of gross sales of tobacco and tobacco products, as well as to clarify that they can be sold at cannabis retail stores and at lower-potency hemp edible retail stores as these businesses will ensure the products are being sold to age-appropriate customers, as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, Washington County, Minnesota, does hereby ordain as follows: . The Code of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, Title 3, Chapter 5, Section 3-5-3 regarding Tobacco Definitions shall be amended by adding the following definition (text to be deleted shown with a struck through and new text shown as underlined): CANNABIS PARAPHERNALIA: All equipment, products, and materials of any kind that are knowingly or intentionally used primarily in: (1) manufacturing cannabis products; (2) ingesting, inhaling, or otherwise introducing cannabis flower or cannabis products into the human body; and (3) testing the strength, effectiveness, or purity of cannabis flower, cannabis products, lower-potency hemp edibles, or hemp-derived consumer products. 2 SECTION 2. AMENDMENT. The Code of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, Title 3, Chapter 5, Section 3-5-6 regarding Tobacco Conditions of License shall be amended as follows (text to be deleted shown with a struck through and new text shown as underlined): § 3-5-6: CONDITIONS OF LICENSE: 3 device or cannabis paraphernalia between the licensee or their employee and the customer. SECTION 3. AMENDMENT. The Code of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, Title 3, Chapter 5, Section 3-5-8 Tobacco Prohibited Acts shall be amended as follows (text to be deleted shown with a struck through and new text shown as underlined): § 3-5-8: PROHIBITED ACTS: 4 A. Illegal Sales: For any person to sell, give, or otherwise provide any tobacco, tobacco product, tobacco-related device or cannabis paraphernalia to any person under twenty- one (21). SECTION 4. AMENDMENT. The Code of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, Title 3, Chapter 13, Section 3-13-2 regarding Cannabis and Lower-Potency Hemp Edible Business Definitions shall be amended as follows (text to be deleted shown with a struck through and new text shown as underlined): § 3-13-2: DEFINITIONS: CANNABIS EVENT: A temporary event organized by a Cannabis Event Organizer at which cannabis or lower-potency hemp edible products are displayed or sold by vendors. 5 Such cannabis event may be comprised solely of cannabis and lower-potency hemp edible vendors or may be part of a larger event at which cannabis and lower-potency hemp edible vendors intend to participate. CANNABIS PARAPHERNALIA: All equipment, products, and materials of any kind that are knowingly or intentionally used primarily in: (1) manufacturing cannabis products; (2) ingesting, inhaling, or otherwise introducing cannabis flower or cannabis products into the human body; and (3) testing the strength, effectiveness, or purity of cannabis flower, cannabis products, lower-potency hemp edibles, or hemp-derived consumer products. OFFICE OF CANNABIS MANAGEMENT or OCM: Minnesota Office of Cannabis Management. STATE LICENSE: An approved license issued by the Minnesota Office of Cannabis Management to a cannabis or lower-potency hemp edible business. SECTION 5. AMENDMENT. The Code of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, Title 3, Chapter 13, Section 3-13-13 regarding Cannabis and Lower Ptoentcy Hemp Edible Business Prohibited Acts shall be amended as follows (text to be deleted shown with a struck through and new text shown as underlined): § 3-13-13: PROHIBITED ACTS: 6 in order to purchase any cannabis or lower-potency hemp edible product or cannabis paraphernalia. SECTION 6. AMENDMENT. The Code of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, Title 5, Chapter 1, Section 5-1-3 B. Drug Paraphernalia Definitions shall be amended as follows (text to be deleted shown with a struck through and new text shown as underlined): § 5-1-3: DRUG PARAPHERNALIA CANNABIS PARAPHERNALIA: All equipment, products, and materials of any kind that are knowingly or intentionally used primarily in: (1) manufacturing cannabis products; (2) ingesting, inhaling, or otherwise introducing cannabis flower or cannabis products into the human body; and (3) testing the strength, effectiveness, or purity of cannabis flower, cannabis products, lower-potency hemp edibles, or hemp-derived consumer products. CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE: A drug, substance, or immediate precursor in Schedules I through V of Minnesota Statutes Section 152.02, as amended. The term shall not include distilled spirits, wine, malt beverages, intoxicating liquors or tobacco. DRUG PARAPHERNALIA: (1) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b), “drug paraphernalia” means all equipment, products, and materials of any kind, except 7 those items used in conjunction with permitted uses of controlled substances under this chapter or the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, which are knowingly or intentionally used primarily in (1) manufacturing a controlled substance, (2) injecting, ingesting, inhaling, or otherwise introducing into the human body a controlled substance, or (3) enhancing the effect of a controlled substance. SECTION 7. SUMMARY PUBLICATION. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 412.191, in the case of a lengthy ordinance, a summary may be published. While a copy of the entire ordinance is available without cost at the office of the City Clerk, the following summary is approved by the City Council and shall be published in lieu of publishing the entire ordinance. SECTION 8. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to law. St. Paul Pioneer Press on _______________________. 1 City Council Action Request 7.H. Meeting Date 9/17/2025 Department Administration Agenda Category Action Item Title Target Settlement Staff Recommendation Approve the Stipulation of Settlement for Parcel 16 by and between Target Corporation and the City, authorize the execution of a Settlement Agreement and payment of the remaining balance of $217,300. Budget Implication Attachments 1. Memo - (E Pt Douglas Rd & Jamaica Ave Reconstruction & Signal Project - Easement) 2. Agreement - Council Settlement (Target) To: From: Date: Subject: Background: On October 19, 2022, by Resolution No. 2022-141, the City Council authorized City officers and agents to acquire permanent and temporary easements for the East Point Douglas Road and Jamaica Avenue Reconstruction and Signal Project (the “Project”) by voluntary negotiation or through eminent domain. The last unsettled Parcel in the Project is Parcel 16 (Target). On November 28, 2022, the City extended a last written offer to Target for a total sum of $250,000. Target rejected this offer, and a Commissioners Hearing was scheduled to determine the value of damages. Before a Commissioners Hearing was held, the parties entered discussions to settle all claims regarding the acquisition by the City and have agreed in principle to settle Parcel 16 for the same amount as the last written offer (the “Agreement”). The Agreement stipulates that the Commissioners award damages as follows: • Parcel 16 (Target), 8655 East Point Douglas Road S. The City will pay the total sum of $250,000.00 in exchange for a full and final settlement of all claims arising from the takings and the Project. This is the same amount as the Council previously authorized for a last written offer. The City previously deposited $32,700.00 with the Washington County District Court for Parcel 16. $217,300.00 would be owed. After approving the Agreement, the award will be filed with Washington County District Court, completing all acquisitions and finalizing the Project. It is recommended that the City Council consider and approve the attached Parcel 16 Stipulation of Settlement Agreement and authorize payment of the balance of the settlement amount to Target. No further Council action is required on the Project after full and complete payment. Action Item: Approve the Stipulation of Settlement for Parcel 16 by and between Target Corporation and the City, authorize the execution of a Settlement Agreement and payment of the remaining balance of $217,300. Dated: 08/21/25Dated: _ _____ _ TARGET CORPORATION F/K/A DAYTON HUDSON CORPORATION By: . r.(011 H'J(nH'erson Title: Sr Director Real Estate FREDRIKSON & BYRON, P.A. By: ____________ _ Howard A. Roston (#0260460) Mark D. Savin (#178007) Patrick D.J. Mahlberg (#0388028) 60 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612)492-7000hroston@fredlaw.commsavin@fredlaw.compmahlberg@fredlaw.comAttorneys for Respondent Target Corporation 7 09/04/2025 1 City Council Action Request 7.I. Meeting Date 9/17/2025 Department Finance Agenda Category Action Item Title Assessment of Unpaid Special Charges on Private Property Staff Recommendation 1) Adopt Resolution 2025-137, Declaring costs to be assessed and ordering preparation of the proposed assessment roll for unpaid special charges on private property. 2) Adopt Resolution 2025-138, Calling for a public hearing on proposed assessments for unpaid special charges from private property. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. Memo Call PH - Unpaid Special Charges 2025 2. Resolution Declare Cost - Unpaid Special Charges 2025 3. Resolution Call Hearing - Unpaid Special Charges 2025 4. Assessment Roll To: From: Date: Subject: Introduction City Ordinance 4-3-1 (Noxious Weeds and Plants; Height Restrictions) states that it is unlawful to allow or permit any growth of grasses or weeds, to a height greater than eight inches (8"). The City was required to contract for the abatement of this condition on several properties. City Ordinance 4-4-1 (Diseased Trees) enforces the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 18G as it relates to the control of dutch elm disease, oak wilt and emerald ash borer disease. Any living or standing tree or part thereof infected to any degree with a plant pest must be removed. The City was required to contract for the abatement of this condition on one property. Minnesota State Statute 429.101 provides cities the ability to assess unpaid special charges associated with the removal or elimination of weeds and the treatment and removal of infested or diseased trees from these private properties. Discussion In 2025, the Code Enforcement Officer issued 79 letters to property owners for violations of the City’s Noxious Weeds and Plants; Height Restrictions ordinance. The property owners were provided with a five-day deadline after receipt of the letter to abate the conditions, after which the City would perform the necessary work and invoice the property owner for the cost of the mowing and an abatement fee. In three instances, the property owner did not abate the conditions, and the invoices remain outstanding. In addition, there are three properties that were noticed in 2024 after the assessment process occurred that did not abate the conditions and the invoices remain unpaid, these are also included in the proposed assessment roll. There was only one violation notice mailed for the Diseased Tree Removal. The private property owner was noticed on four separate occasions: 06/17/24, 07/18/24, 09/03/24 and 11/13/24. There was a total of six diseased trees that were removed from this property on 12/10/24. The property owner was invoiced for the cost of the tree removal and an abatement fee. This instance also occurred after the certification deadline in 2024. The City contracted with outside vendors to have the properties mowed and trees removed. This assessment is for the actual cost of the mowing and tree removal and an abatement fee which is charged as follows: o $55.00 for first violation in 24-months. o $105.00 for second violation in 24-months commencing within first violation. o $205.00 for third and subsequent violations in 24-months commencing within first violation. th, 2025. Individual notices will be sent to the property owners. Once these costs are assessed, they become a lien on the property that will be collected along with property taxes over a one-year period. Recommendation CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE RESOLUTION DECLARING COSTS TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR UNPAID SPECIAL CHARGES FROM PRIVATE PROPERTY th day of September 2025. CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE RESOLUTION CALLING FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS FOR UNPAID SPECIAL CHARGES FROM PRIVATE PROPERTY th 2025, the Council directed the Finance Director to prepare the proposed assessment roll for unpaid special charges and th day of September 2025. UNPAID SPECIAL CHARGES - 2025 PID Property Address Date of Abatement Abatement Reason Total 15.027.21.21.0060 8120 Jergen Ave S 7/4/2025 Tall Weeds 356.71 17.027.21.14.0024 8274 Hemingway Ave S 6/12/2025 Tall Weeds 270.01 15.027.21.14.0037 8346 Jorgensen Ave S 10/3/2024 Tall Weeds 237.50 16.027.21.42.0005 8520 Isle Ave S 6/19/2025 Tall Weeds 248.34 09.027.21.34.0047 7837 Ideal Ave S 9/27/2024 Tall Weeds 289.08 09.027.21.34.0072 7799 Ideal Ave S 9/27/2024 Tall Weeds 220.33 16.027.21.14.0050 8300 Isle Ave S 12/10/2024 Diseased Trees 4,409.94 6,031.91$ 1 City Council Action Request 7.J. Meeting Date 9/17/2025 Department Engineering Agenda Category Action Item Title 2025 Pavement Management Project - Declare Costs to be Assessed and Call for a Public Hearing Staff Recommendation 1) Adopt Resolution 2025-135 declaring the costs to be assessed for the 2025 Pavement Management Project. 2) Adopt Resolution 2025-136 calling for a Public Hearing to be held on October 15, 2025, for the 2025 Pavement Management Project. Budget Implication $3,341,632.71 - Assessments, Utility Funds, General Levy Attachments 1. Memo 2025 PM Declare Costs 2025-09-17 2. 2025 PM Declare Costs Resolution 2025-135 3. 2025 PM Call for PH on Proposed Assessment Resolution 2025-136 4. 2025-09-02 Assessment Roll To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From: Crystal Raleigh, PE, Assistant City Engineer Brenda Malinowski, Finance Director Date: September 10, 2025 Re: 2025 Pavement Management Project – Declare Costs to be Assessed and Call for Public Hearing Background On August 21, 2024, the City Council authorized a feasibility report for the 2025 Pavement Management Project as outlined in the Capital Improvement Plan for the following areas: • Hidden Valley: Streets include 73rd Street South from Hardwood Avenue to Hidden Valley Lane South, Hidden Valley Lane South from Hidden Valley Court South to Hidden Valley Trail South, Hidden Valley Trail South from Hidden Valley Lane South to Hidden Valley Court South, Hidden Valley Pond South, Hidden Valley Cove South, 72nd Street Court South, 72nd Street South from Hidden Valley Trail South to Hinton Avenue South, Hidden Valley Terrace South, Hidden Valley Ridge South, Hidden Valley Hollow South, Hidden Valley Court South, 74th Street South from Hidden Valley Trail South to Hinton Avenue South. The Hidden Valley roadways listed above are 19 to 38 years old. They were examined to determine their condition. In a visual inspection, the roadways showed extensive cracking, stripping, raveling, and failure of previous thin overlays. The pavement cores showed asphalt stripping and severe degradation. The condition of the curb and gutter varied throughout the development with approximately 23 percent of the curb requiring replacement. As with previous pavement management projects, utilities within the project limits were examined for necessary maintenance. Overall, the utilities were found to be in good condition, but some maintenance work was required. The top sections of sanitary and storm manhole structures were upgraded to meet current City standards, corroded valves were replaced as necessary, hydrants were reconditioned and repainted as necessary, and concrete hydrant pads were installed. Two pressure reducing valves (PRV’s) within the neighborhood were replaced. Additionally, the condition of street light infrastructure was evaluated, and some improvements were made. A special benefit appraisal was completed in accordance with the City’s policy for those properties with direct access to the streets included in the project area. The Feasibility Report was approved, and the preparation of plans and specifications was authorized by the City Council on December 4, 2024, A neighborhood meeting was held on December 10, 2024, to discuss the various improvements proposed, the findings of the special benefit appraisal, and the proposed assessments. A Public Hearing for the project was held on December 18, 2024 and the project was ordered. Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Jennifer Levitt Discussion Hidden Valley Feasibility Report Construction Cost As-Bid Construction Cost Estimated Final Construction Cost Total Cost (1) Streets $2,051,895.00 $1,863,233.25 $1,740,309.91 $2,248,433.10 Sanitary Sewer $119,350.00 $123,035.00 $123,035.00 $158,957.88 Water Main $177,740.00 $267,530.00 $267,787.17 $345,973.74 Storm Sewer $212,730.00 $202,110.50 $205,763.50 $265,840.85 Street Lighting $151,800.00 $94,655.00 $61,329.00 $79,235.40 Hidden Valley Park (2) $191,510.00 $188,843.20 $188,232.86 $243,191.74 Totals $2,905,025.00 $2,739,406.95 $2,586,457.44 $3,341,632.71 1. Includes actual indirect costs. 2. Cost associated with park construction are not assessed to residents. Action Requested Recommendation • Resolution 2025-135 declaring the costs to be assessed and Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Jennifer Levitt • Resolution 2025-136 calling for a public hearing to be held on October 15, 2025 for the 2025 Pavement Management Project. CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION DECLARING COSTS TO BE ASSESSED AND WHEREAS, contracts were let for the 2025 Pavement Management Project and the contract price for such improvements was $2,739,406.95. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, as follows: 1. The net cost of such improvements to be assessed is declared to be $3,341,632.71. 2. The Finance Director, with the assistance of the City Engineer, will calculate the proper amount to be assessed for such improvements against every assessable lot or piece of parcel or land within the district affected without regard to cash valuation as provided by law, and shall file a copy of proposed assessment roll in the City Clerk’s office for public inspection. 3. The City Clerk shall, upon completion of such assessment roll, notify the City Council therefore. Passed this 17th day of September 2025. Myron Bailey, Mayor Attest: Tamara Anderson, City Clerk CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2025-135, passed by the City Council on September 17, 2025, the Council directed the Finance Director to prepare the proposed assessment roll for the 2025 Pavement Management Project; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk has notified the Council that such assessment roll is complete and filed in her office for public inspection. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, as follows: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 15th day of October 2025 at 7:00 p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessment roll. 2. The Finance Director is hereby directed to cause a Notice of Hearing on the proposed assessments to be published in the Saint Paul Pioneer Press, the official newspaper of the City, at least two (2) weeks prior to the hearing and shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement and the proposed interest rate of 4.60 percent. The Finance Director shall cause mailed notices to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll. Passed this 17th day of September 2025. Myron Bailey, Mayor Attest: Tamara Anderson, City Clerk Parcel ID Owner Name Address Units $/Unit Total/Unit 802721120012 MILES CHANDARA T & SAMBO T 7713 72ND ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120013 STUBBLEFIELD JENNIFER A & RYAN W 7739 72ND ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120014 RICHARD D & DORTHY M SCHEUER TRS 7763 72ND ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120015 BAYER AARON & JENNIFER 7781 72ND ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120016 NYBAKKEN TANYA & ERIC 7750 72ND ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120017 HUGHES JAMES A & LEAH J 7742 72ND ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120018 KELL JOSEPH S & JEANNE M 7730 72ND ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120019 SANDERS MEGAN & ALEX 7712 72ND ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120053 BRYDEN RANDY J & LINDA A 7678 72ND STREET CT S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120054 SUTER DANIEL J & CARMEN M 7636 72ND STREET CT S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120055 STEWART ZACHARY & AMY HARGENRADER 7594 72ND STREET CT S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120056 HARRIS RAYMOND B & ELIZABETH 7552 72ND STREET CT S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120060 SOSU THEOPHILUS K 7530 72ND STREET CT S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120061 FERCH BRETT 7529 72ND STREET CT S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120062 THRUSH TIMOTHY A & LAURIE A 7541 72ND STREET CT S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120063 GROSE STEPHEN R & MICHELLE K 7573 72ND STREET CT S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120064 BLOCH PAUL R & KELLY J 7615 72ND STREET CT S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120065 MCCAULEY MICHAEL & MICHELLE M 7657 72ND STREET CT S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120066 LANGBEHN GREGORY A & KATHLEEN 7699 72ND STREET CT S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721210011 ANGELO MARK & LARA 7399 73RD ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721210012 MARTINEZ ROLLAND M & DIANA M 7393 73RD ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721210013 JOHNSTON DAVID E & NANCY A 7379 73RD ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721210014 SMITH LARRY L & VICKY L 7367 73RD ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721210015 ASHOK ANJALI & GAOZONG VANG 7339 73RD ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721210016 STEMPER PAUL S & CATHERINE M 7311 73RD ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130008 DWYER WILLIAM G & ANNE C 7740 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130009 HANZLIK NANCY & MICHAEL 7736 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130010 LETHERT NICHOLAS & KELLY 7732 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130011 LYKSETT KEITH B & SHELLY S 7728 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130012 PIOMBINO ROB & NATALIE 7724 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130013 MEKENYE EDWIN & JANET ISABOKE 7722 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130014 GAKELER JASON & AMANDA R 7718 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130015 SCHWINN THOMAS J JR 7714 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130016 PATNODE ADAM D & JAMIE R ALEXANDER 7710 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130017 MAUER NATHAN & JENNIFER 7700 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130018 GROSS DAVID A & JENNIFER L 7660 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130019 NOVOTNY LIV TRS 7640 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130020 ANDERSON CHRISTOPHER M 7610 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130021 HOLSTEIN DANE G 7739 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130022 TRUDEAU SAMUEL O & NICOLE T FITZGERALD 7733 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130023 HER MAUNG & TINA G XIONG 7729 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130024 HUBER KENNETH S & JANICE A 7725 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130025 MENGISTU GOLIE & FIKERTE HAILU 7721 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130026 ZENNER GARY A 7717 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130027 LAMBERT SONDRA J & ELIZABETH A DAVISON 7715 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130028 SUCHOMEL ROBERT J & TANYA L 7711 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130029 POLLY CONSTANCE D 7707 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130030 GUNDERSON JEFF S & JANET A 7703 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130031 KENNEY FAMILY TRS 7699 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130032 BARRIENTES MARY E & JAMES 7669 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130033 DWYER GRACIE & JOEL CRATON 7649 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130034 FOX LAWRENCE W 7629 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130035 GARCIA RAUL F JR & NATALIA M 7609 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130079 WESTON ROBERT J & SANDRA K 7592 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130080 GULSTAD DARRYL R & KATRINA I 7576 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130081 CLAUSEN DAVID A & JANE M 7560 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130082 ODELL IAN & ERIN 7544 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130083 MONSON SALLY 7528 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130084 DAVID J EMMONS & ROSEMARY K EMMONS TRS 7512 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130085 KHAMBATA CRYSTAL & ANTHONY 7515 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130086 FROST THOMAS & DANA 7525 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130087 CUSEY TROY A & INGRID N TOLLEFSON 7547 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130088 MCCARTHY KEVIN M & KATHRYN A 7567 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 Assessment Roll Hidden Valley 2025 Pavement Management | 24X.135777 Appendix C: Preliminary Assessment Roll Page C-1 Parcel ID Owner Name Address Units $/Unit Total/Unit Assessment Roll Hidden Valley 802721130089 NELSON JAMES D & LINDA L 7575 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130090 PEDERSON COLLIN D 7591 74TH ST S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240017 BREDAHL TIMOTHY D & RUTH I 7483 HIDDEN VALLEY CT S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240018 SCRIMSHAW SCOTT R & JENNIFER L 7485 HIDDEN VALLEY CT S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240019 DIETZ ROBERT W & JULIE A 7487 HIDDEN VALLEY CT S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240020 RENELT BRIAN P & DEANNA L 7491 HIDDEN VALLEY CT S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240021 SOMERS STEVEN & MEGAN 7493 HIDDEN VALLEY CT S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240022 CORY CHARLES & ROXANNE L 7497 HIDDEN VALLEY CT S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240023 KHRAISS STEVEN & HEATHER 7499 HIDDEN VALLEY CT S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240024 FENDOS PAUL G & JESSICA M I 7448 HIDDEN VALLEY LN S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240025 LIBMAN DAVID S 7457 HIDDEN VALLEY CT S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240026 REAGAN MICHAEL & PEGGY 7455 HIDDEN VALLEY CT S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240027 OSZMAN MARK S & BEVERLY L 7451 HIDDEN VALLEY CT S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240028 KELEMEN MARK & KELLI DUNN-KELEMEN 7447 HIDDEN VALLEY LN S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240029 CRATON ERIC P & MICHELE A 7443 HIDDEN VALLEY LN S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240033 HUTCHINSON AVALON JW & JAMES M 7441 HIDDEN VALLEY LN S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240034 LA SELL BRANDON & RACHEL JOHNSON 7444 HIDDEN VALLEY LN S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240035 JOHNSEN TERRY N & ROXANNE M 7442 HIDDEN VALLEY LN S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240036 QUINN MICHAEL C & TRACEY P 7438 HIDDEN VALLEY LN S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240037 SAMSEL THEODORE A JR & GINA R 7428 HIDDEN VALLEY LN S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240038 KNUDTEN RACHELE C 7416 HIDDEN VALLEY LN S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240039 SOLBERG CARL O & DIANE L 7404 HIDDEN VALLEY LN S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240040 MUNTER LINDA B 7394 HIDDEN VALLEY LN S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240043 JENKINS DANIEL P & TIMI C 7382 HIDDEN VALLEY RDG S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240044 KONECHNEY CHRISTOPHER J & ALISON L KONECHNEY 7370 HIDDEN VALLEY RDG S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240045 CROTTEAU FAMILY LIV TRS 7368 HIDDEN VALLEY RDG S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240046 CONVERY BRIAN J & STACEY L 7356 HIDDEN VALLEY RDG S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240047 MCGRAW TIMOTHY & LYNN 7344 HIDDEN VALLEY RDG S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240048 GLOVER MARK J & GALE M 7330 HIDDEN VALLEY RDG S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240049 AIMONETTI PETER M & JEAN I 7322 HIDDEN VALLEY RDG S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240050 KELLIE TRUMAN 7318 HIDDEN VALLEY RDG S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240051 KELLIE TRUMAN UNASSIGNED 0 $5,313.60 $0.00 802721240053 FREDRICKSEN ANGELA J 7290 HIDDEN VALLEY TER S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240054 DE LA FOREST ROBERT & MEGAN 7288 HIDDEN VALLEY TER S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240055 BERUBE SHELLEY & DANIEL BERQUIST 7276 HIDDEN VALLEY TER S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240056 BUBB GREGORY E & CAROL L 7262 HIDDEN VALLEY TER S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240057 TREBER BRIAN D & DINA L 7250 HIDDEN VALLEY TER S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721210006 SANDIN MEGAN A 7230 HIDDEN VALLEY LN S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721210007 COLEMAN DAWN R & SCOTT R 7228 HIDDEN VALLEY LN S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721210008 WARNKE MARK W & DEBORAH L 7216 HIDDEN VALLEY LN S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721210009 POLLACK REED F 7204 HIDDEN VALLEY LN S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721210010 PEGGY A SCHOENBERGER REV TRS 7192 HIDDEN VALLEY LN S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721210019 FOX DANIEL J & REBECCA M 7292 HIDDEN VALLEY CV S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721210020 ERIE JACOB D & CARISSA L 7278 HIDDEN VALLEY CV S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721210021 STEPKA JEREMY & JANA 7256 HIDDEN VALLEY CV S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721210022 VILLAS DANIEL G & JILL K 7234 HIDDEN VALLEY CV S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721210023 DRUDE NATHAN & ALICIA 7222 HIDDEN VALLEY CV S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721210024 VICK RYAN E 7198 HIDDEN VALLEY CV S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721210025 MANSERGH DAWN & JOHN 7176 HIDDEN VALLEY CV S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721210026 PICHOTTA MAXWELL & STEFANIE 7142 HIDDEN VALLEY CV S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721210027 EWERT JEFFREY & LAURA STUCKI 7159 HIDDEN VALLEY CV S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721210028 MERLAU JAMIE J & JILLIAN R 7169 HIDDEN VALLEY CV S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721210029 CHANCE WESLEY D & DIANA M 7191 HIDDEN VALLEY CV S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721210030 WILLIAMS RICHARD & DAWN 7213 HIDDEN VALLEY CV S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721210031 WALL TIM D & DARCY A 7245 HIDDEN VALLEY CV S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721210032 HERMERSMANN ANDREA L 7267 HIDDEN VALLEY CV S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721210033 TOROK STEPHEN L & TRUDENCE J 7289 HIDDEN VALLEY CV S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240009 HTOO SHAR L & ROSIE WAH 7461 HIDDEN VALLEY CT S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240010 TRISKO NICHOLAS P & LISA L 7463 HIDDEN VALLEY CT S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240011 QUINN TIMOTHY P & SANDRA L 7465 HIDDEN VALLEY CT S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240012 WITTROCK THOMAS & DIANA 7467 HIDDEN VALLEY CT S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240013 PATTERSON CRAIG T & LISA M 7471 HIDDEN VALLEY CT S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240014 MAURER FAMILY LIVING TRS 7475 HIDDEN VALLEY CT S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 2025 Pavement Management | 24X.135777 Appendix C: Preliminary Assessment Roll Page C-2 Parcel ID Owner Name Address Units $/Unit Total/Unit Assessment Roll Hidden Valley 802721240015 PINES ERNEST T & THERESA JANE 7479 HIDDEN VALLEY CT S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240016 OLDENKAMP GREGORY L & ANN M K 7481 HIDDEN VALLEY CT S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120070 KAREL JOSEPH & SARAH 7205 HIDDEN VALLEY LN S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120071 MCCUSKER WILLIAM P & ELIZABETH A MANNING MCCUSKER 7191 HIDDEN VALLEY LN S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120072 DIETZ CAREY A 7179 HIDDEN VALLEY LN S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120073 PATRICIA M BLEES LIV TRS 7180 HIDDEN VALLEY LN S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120074 AVISE KEVIN F & KATHLEEN M 7178 HIDDEN VALLEY LN S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130036 RICHARD E IHRKE & MARGARET A IHRKE TRS 7407 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120031 GALLOWAY TIMOTHY J & LORI A 7155 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120032 FINK TIMOTHY & TERESA A 7153 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120033 HAAS RICHARD & JUDITH 7151 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120034 YANG ENG & MAO HER 7149 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120035 JOHNSON JOHN E & MOLLY K 7147 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120036 WALLER TODD 7143 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120037 IRVINE SANDRA L 7139 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120038 MOERKE ANDREW & TERESA 7137 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120039 WEBER STEVEN C & MELINDA R 7135 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120040 SLAIKEU DAMON S 7158 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120041 HODGE JESSE R & SARA A 7146 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120042 KILGORE TRS 7134 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120044 FREY MATTHEW H & DANA L 7127 HIDDEN VALLEY LN S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120045 KARASEK MATHEW & RACHEL 7129 HIDDEN VALLEY LN S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120046 BLUHM BRIAN C & JENNIFER LM 7131 HIDDEN VALLEY LN S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120047 BENSHOOF MARK A & DEBRA J 7133 HIDDEN VALLEY LN S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120048 WAGNER MICHAEL A 7141 HIDDEN VALLEY LN S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120049 BRAUN ROBERT L & RHONDA A 7145 HIDDEN VALLEY LN S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120050 LENTZ JOHN M & MARY K 7149 HIDDEN VALLEY LN S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120051 FRANCIS NICOLAS L & SHERYL L 7157 HIDDEN VALLEY LN S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120057 BROSNAHAN HELEN & M S ZAUHA 7138 HIDDEN VALLEY LN S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120058 ARMSTRONG CHRISTOPHER J & CASSIE J ALLEN-ARMSTRONG 7144 HIDDEN VALLEY LN S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120059 GILBERT RORY J & ALICE A 7150 HIDDEN VALLEY LN S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120068 LUU TAM D & ALLISON R 7229 HIDDEN VALLEY LN S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120069 SCHWARTZ ANTHONY R 7217 HIDDEN VALLEY LN S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130037 WALLIN ZACHARY S & AMY 7409 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130038 DEVLIN MOLLY & MICHAEL 7411 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130039 TAMARA L MCKISSOCK & JEFFREY A MCKISSOCK TRS 7419 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130040 UECKER KYLE R & BARBRA J 7421 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130041 COLLINS JAMES K & BARBARA J 7423 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130042 TRS AGR JEFFREY S CHRISTENSEN & GAY L HERMAN 7425 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130043 ANDERSON STEPHANIE & ERIC 7427 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130044 GORES MICHAEL D & SUSAN C 7429 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130045 HEYWOOD STEVEN L & JOANNE M 7431 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130046 KAEPPE JOSHUA L & LEAH 7433 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130047 CENTENO ANGEL M & BLANCA A C VEGA 7437 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130048 RYMAN KELLI & ROBERT MOORE 7441 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130049 ELYAMANY AHMED 7445 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130050 DRABCZAK HENRY A & CHERYL L 7449 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130051 OTTE EARL 7408 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130052 ELLIS ASHLAND & MADELINE 7416 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130053 R&M REAL ESTATE LLC 7424 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130054 KLEINSCHMIDT TRAVIS L & SARAH E 7432 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130055 LARSON DEBRA K & STEVEN C 7440 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130056 SOLYNTJES RONALD P 7448 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130059 DYKSTRA ANDREW L & DEBORAH L 7388 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130060 EDMUNDSON JOHN D & DEBORAH A 7382 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130061 WALTER W LYSZAK & MARIANNE P LYSZAK TRS 7366 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130062 KRAFT JOHN LLOYD & SHIRLEY I 7346 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130063 GEORGE JAMES E & PENELOPE C 7334 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130064 MEADE BRYCE K 7320 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130065 KOLTES STEPHEN M & LENORA M 7264 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130066 BROOKS JAMES R & HEATHER 7244 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130067 THIEDE DAVID J & CYNTHIA A 7393 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130068 HILL JAY R & SUSAN A 7385 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 2025 Pavement Management | 24X.135777 Appendix C: Preliminary Assessment Roll Page C-3 Parcel ID Owner Name Address Units $/Unit Total/Unit Assessment Roll Hidden Valley 802721130069 MCMORROW LANCE R 7371 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130070 LONGFIELD BRADLEY J & LINDA W 7359 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130071 BURBANK JOHN M & SUSAN L W 7347 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130072 TAYLOR JEREMY & LEAH 7341 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130073 KROPELNICKI DOUGLAS W & REBECC 7335 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130074 MAXEY MICHAEL & LUDMILA 7319 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130075 STRICKLAND DANIEL 7305 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130076 BECKWITH LORI M 7301 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130077 WILLIAMS AMY J 7265 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130091 SAMEC RAYMOND A & JAMIE L 7450 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130095 JENKINS PETER R & NOREEN E 7435 HIDDEN VALLEY HOLW S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130096 SCHERER ADELINE & JONATHAN 7423 HIDDEN VALLEY HOLW S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130097 NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC 7421 HIDDEN VALLEY HOLW S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130098 ADOLFSON KIRSTIN E 7419 HIDDEN VALLEY HOLW S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130099 PETRIE DAVID R & KATHLEEN R 7417 HIDDEN VALLEY HOLW S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130100 COOK CHADWICK & TRICIA 7415 HIDDEN VALLEY HOLW S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130101 HEIN KELLY W & KIRSTI B 7413 HIDDEN VALLEY HOLW S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130102 YANG KUJO L & MAY VANG 7395 HIDDEN VALLEY LN S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130103 HANSON NATHAN & AMY 7303 HIDDEN VALLEY LN S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130104 FENENGA THOMAS & GRETCHEN 7439 HIDDEN VALLEY HOLW S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721130105 TRAN DUNG A & AN T NGUYEN 7437 HIDDEN VALLEY HOLW S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120020 KRAMMER KATHERINE A & ROBERT LEIER 7191 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120021 SCHUELLER RONALD J & DIANE J 7183 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120022 DJADOO KIRSTEN A & KWAME A 7173 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120023 WERNER LUKE & LYDIA 7157 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120024 FLAATA DALE R & KIMBERLY A 7212 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120025 LANDMEYER SANDRA J 7192 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120026 MATHIS IAN M & JENNIFER L 7184 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120027 SPROULE ANTHONY X 7170 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721120028 HANSEN JEFFREY R & SARAH M 7162 HIDDEN VALLEY TRL S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721210035 WASHENBERGER CHARLES L & REBECCA J 7288 HIDDEN VALLEY POND S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721210036 JANICE M REDIUS TRS 7266 HIDDEN VALLEY POND S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721210037 FRYER RICHARD D & DANITH A 7244 HIDDEN VALLEY POND S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721210038 HELSETH ALISHA M & JOSHUA L 7182 HIDDEN VALLEY POND S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721210039 VALENTO KEVIN G & ANN SIEDL-VALENTO 7140 HIDDEN VALLEY POND S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721210040 RICE ADAM G & TRACIE M 7100 HIDDEN VALLEY POND S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721210041 STEINKE JONATHAN K & AMY M 7135 HIDDEN VALLEY POND S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721210042 CHA MAY S 7177 HIDDEN VALLEY POND S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721210043 KNAFLA RONALD C 7239 HIDDEN VALLEY POND S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721210044 VOGELE DUANE J & STACY A 7251 HIDDEN VALLEY POND S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721210045 ANDERSON FORREST M & LINDA K MACKEY-ANDERSON 7293 HIDDEN VALLEY POND S 1 $5,313.60 $5,313.60 802721240041 HIDDEN VALLEY HOA UNASSIGNED 0 $5,313.60 $0.00 802721240052 HIDDEN VALLEY HOA UNASSIGNED 0 $5,313.60 $0.00 802721210003 CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE UNASSIGNED 0 $5,313.60 $0.00 802721210004 CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE UNASSIGNED 0 $5,313.60 $0.00 802721210017 HIDDEN VALLEY HOA UNASSIGNED 0 $5,313.60 $0.00 802721210034 HIDDEN VALLEY HOA UNASSIGNED 0 $5,313.60 $0.00 802721240006 HIDDEN VALLEY HOMEOWNERS ASSN UNASSIGNED 0 $5,313.60 $0.00 802721240007 HIDDEN VALLEY HOMEOWNERS ASSN UNASSIGNED 0 $5,313.60 $0.00 802721240008 CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE UNASSIGNED 0 $5,313.60 $0.00 802721210046 HIDDEN VALLEY HOA UNASSIGNED 0 $5,313.60 $0.00 802721130002 HIDDEN VALLEY HOMEOWNERS ASSN UNASSIGNED 0 $5,313.60 $0.00 802721130003 HIDDEN VALLEY HOMEOWNERS ASSN UNASSIGNED 0 $5,313.60 $0.00 802721130004 HIDDEN VALLEY HOMEOWNERS ASSN UNASSIGNED 0 $5,313.60 $0.00 802721130005 HIDDEN VALLEY HOMEOWNERS ASSN UNASSIGNED 0 $5,313.60 $0.00 802721130006 HIDDEN VALLEY HOMEOWNERS ASSN UNASSIGNED 0 $5,313.60 $0.00 802721130007 HIDDEN VALLEY HOMEOWNERS ASSN UNASSIGNED 0 $5,313.60 $0.00 802721120030 HIDDEN VALLEY HOMEOWNERS ASSN UNASSIGNED 0 $5,313.60 $0.00 802721120043 HIDDEN VALLEY HOMEOWNERS ASSN UNASSIGNED 0 $5,313.60 $0.00 802721120052 HIDDEN VALLEY HOMEOWNERS ASSN UNASSIGNED 0 $5,313.60 $0.00 802721120067 CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE UNASSIGNED 0 $5,313.60 $0.00 802721130057 HIDDEN VALLEY HOA UNASSIGNED 0 $5,313.60 $0.00 802721130058 HIDDEN VALLEY HOA UNASSIGNED 0 $5,313.60 $0.00 2025 Pavement Management | 24X.135777 Appendix C: Preliminary Assessment Roll Page C-4 Parcel ID Owner Name Address Units $/Unit Total/Unit Assessment Roll Hidden Valley 802721130078 HIDDEN VALLEY HOMEOWNERS ASSN UNASSIGNED 0 $5,313.60 $0.00 802721130092 HIDDEN VALLEY HOA UNASSIGNED 0 $5,313.60 $0.00 802721120008 HIDDEN VALLEY HOA UNASSIGNED 0 $5,313.60 $0.00 802721120009 HIDDEN VALLEY HOA UNASSIGNED 0 $5,313.60 $0.00 802721120010 HIDDEN VALLEY HOA UNASSIGNED 0 $5,313.60 $0.00 802721120011 CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE UNASSIGNED 0 $5,313.60 $0.00 802721120029 HIDDEN VALLEY HOA UNASSIGNED 0 $5,313.60 $0.00 229 $1,216,814.40 2025 Pavement Management | 24X.135777 Appendix C: Preliminary Assessment Roll Page C-5 1 City Council Action Request 7.K. Meeting Date 9/17/2025 Department Public Works Agenda Category Action Item Title Utility and Engineering Division Building Final Payment - City Contracts Staff Recommendation 1) Adopt Resolution 2025-125, authorizing payment in the amount $12,394.22 to Autumn Ridge Landscaping Inc. for the final payment for the Utility and Engineering Division Building Project. 2) Adopt Resolution 2025-127, authorizing payment in the amount $22,476.36 to Ebert, Inc. dba Ebert Construction for the final payment for the Utility and Engineering Division Building Project. 3) Adopt Resolution 2025-128, authorizing payment in the amount $3,818.55 to Ebert, Inc. dba Ebert Construction for the final payment for the Utility and Engineering Division Building Project. 4) Adopt Resolution 2025-129, authorizing payment in the amount $38,748.00 to Fobbe Electric, Inc. for the final payment for the Utility and Engineering Division Building Project. 5) Adopt Resolution 2025-133, authorizing payment in the amount of $8,570.77 to Jackson & Associates LLC for the final payment for the Utility and Engineering Division Building. 6) Adopt Resolution 2025-130 authorizing payment in the amount $997.71 to MCI, Inc. dba Multiple Concept Interiors, Inc. for the final payment for the Utility and Engineering Division Building Project.. 7) Adopt Resolution 2025-131, authorizing payment in the amount $949.80 to Spartan Steel Erectors, Inc. for the final payment for the Utility and Engineering Division Building Project. Budget Implication $87,955.41 - Water & Sewer Utility Funds and Bonds Attachments 1. Memo 2. AUTUMN RIDGE RESOLUTION 3. Autumn Ridge - Final Pay App & Supporting Documents 4. EBERT RESOLUTION 127 5. Ebert Contract 1 - Final Pay App & Supporting Documents 6. EBERT 2 RESOLUTION 7. Ebert Contract 2 - Final Pay App & Supporting Documents 2 8. FOBBE RESOLUTION 9. Fobbe - Final Pay App & Supporting Documents 10. JACKSON&ASSOCIATES RESOLUTION 11. Jackson&Associates - Final Pay App & Supporting Documents 12. MCI RESOLUTION 13. MCI - Final Pay App & Supporting Documents 14. SPARTAN STEEL RESOLUTION 15. Spartan Steel - Final Pay App & Supporting Documents Kraus-Anderson Construction 501 South 8th Street Minneapolis, MN 55404 Phone: (612) 332-7281 Web: www.krausanderson.com August 27, 2025 Ryan Burfeind, PE Public Works Director City of Cottage Grove 12800 Ravine Parkway South Cottage Grove, MN 55016 Re: CM Agency Contract Summary Letter City of Cottage Grove Utility & Engineering Building 10795 Ideal Avenue South Cottage Grove, Minnesota Dear Mr. Burfeind, We respectfully present the following summary of CM Agency Contracts through project completion for the Cottage Grove City Council meeting on September 3, 2025: Work Scope CMa Contractor Original Contract Amount Final Contract Amount 05B Spartan Steel Erectors, Inc. $88,600.00 $94,980.00 06A Ebert, Inc. dba Ebert Construction $412,200.00 $445,612.94 07H Jackson & Associates LLC $562,427.00 $560,077.00 09D MCI, Inc. dba Multiple Concept Interiors, Inc. $95,455.00 $99,770.50 26A Fobbe Electric, Inc. $933,250.00 $1,004,514.23 32B Ebert, Inc. dba Ebert Construction $146,000.00 $128,928.80 32F Autumn Ridge Landscaping, Inc. $249,480.00 $254,021.41 The work from these contractors is complete and we recommend the approval of the final payments for each contractor. The final costs for each contractor are shown in the table above. Attached are the final pay requests along with the required IC-134 forms, lien waivers and Consent of Surety to Final Payment. The total of the seven contracts as bid, is $2,487,412.00. The final cost for these contracts is $2,587,904.88. The additional costs, $100,492.88, which were previously approved by the Council through change orders, are within the project budgeted contingencies. The overages are due to various additional, necessary, miscellaneous items addressed during construction. Page 2 We have reviewed the work of these contractors with city staff and have found it to be acceptable. The work will be reviewed again within the contracts warranty period and any issues will be addressed under the project warranty with the contractor(s). Sincerely, Kraus-Anderson Construction Ben Albrecht Assistant Project Manager Kraus-Anderson Construction cc: Lee Mann, Stantec Dan Kjellberg, Kraus-Anderson Construction Rachel Struckman, Kraus-Anderson Construction CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE WHEREAS, the Public Works Director has certified that work has been satisfactorily completed; and WHEREAS, the original total contract amount for Autumn Ridge Landscaping, Inc. was $249,480. The final construction cost was $254,021.41, which is $4,541.41 greater than the contract amount. The increased construction cost was approved by the Council through change orders, and is within the project budgeted contingencies; and WHEREAS, the project has been satisfactorily completed in accordance with the contract plans and specifications. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, that $12,394.22 is paid to Autumn Ridge Landscaping, Inc. for the final payment for the Utility and Engineering Division Building Project. Passed this 17th day of September, 2025. Myron Bailey, Mayor Attest: Tamara Anderson, City Clerk CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE WHEREAS, the Public Works Director has certified that work has been satisfactorily completed; and WHEREAS, the original total contract amount for Ebert, Inc. dba Ebert Construction was $412,200. The final construction cost was $445,612.94, which is $33,412.94 greater than the contract amount. The increased construction cost was approved by the Council through change orders, and is within the project budgeted contingencies; and WHEREAS, the project has been satisfactorily completed in accordance with the contract plans and specifications. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, that $22,476.36 is paid to Ebert Inc. dba Ebert Construction for the final payment for the Utility and Engineering Division Building Project. Passed this 17th day of September, 2025. Myron Bailey, Mayor Attest: Tamara Anderson, City Clerk POWER OF ATTORNEY Know All Persons By These Presents, that MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY (MUTUAL) and MERCHANTS NATIONAL BONDING, INC., both being corporations of the State of Iowa, d/b/a Merchants National Indemnity Company (in California only) (herein collectively called the “Companies”) do hereby make, constitute and appoint, individually, their true and lawful Attorney(s)-in-Fact, to sign its name as surety(ies) and to execute, seal and acknowledge any and all bonds, undertakings, contracts and other written instruments in the nature thereof, on behalf of the Companies in their business of guaranteeing the fidelity of persons, guaranteeing the performance of contracts and executing or guaranteeing bonds and undertakings required or permitted in any actions or proceedings allowed by law. This Power-of-Attorney is granted and is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by authority of the following By-Laws adopted by the Board of Directors of Merchants Bonding Company (Mutual) on April 23, 2011 and amended August 14, 2015 and April 27, 2024 and adopted by the Board of Directors of Merchants National Bonding, Inc., on October 16, 2015 and amended on April 27, 2024. "The President, Secretary, Treasurer, or any Assistant Treasurer or any Assistant Secretary or any Vice President shall have power and authority to appoint Attorneys-in-Fact, and to authorize them to execute on behalf of the Company, and attach the seal of the Company thereto, bonds and undertakings, recognizances, contracts of indemnity and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof.” “The signature of any authorized officer and the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile or electronic transmission to any Power of Attorney or Certification thereof authorizing the execution and delivery of any bond, undertaking, recognizance, or other suretyship o bligations of the Company, and such signature and seal when so used shall have the same force and effect as though manually fixed." In connection with obligations in favor of the Florida Department of Transportation only, it is agreed that the power and aut hority hereby given to the Attorney-in-Fact includes any and all consents for the release of retained percentages and/or final estimates on engineering and construction contracts required by the State of Florida Department of Transportation. It is fully understood that consenting to the State of Florida Department of Transportation making payment of the final estimate to the Contractor and/or its assignee, shall not relieve this surety company of any of i ts obligations under its bond. In connection with obligations in favor of the Kentucky Department of Highways only, it is agreed that the power and authority hereby givento the Attorney-in-Fact cannot be modified or revoked unless prior written personal notice of such intent has been given to the Commissioner-Department of Highways of the Commonwealth of Kentucky at least thirty (30) days prior to the modification or revocation. In Witness Whereof, the Companies have caused this instrument to be signed and sealed this day of , . MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY (MUTUAL) MERCHANTS NATIONAL BONDING, INC. d/b/a MERCHANTS NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY By PresidentSTATE OF IOWA COUNTY OF DALLAS ss. On this day of , before me appeared Larry Taylor, to me personally known, who being by me duly sworn did say that he is President of MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY (MUTUAL) and MERCHANTS NATIONAL BONDING, INC.; and that the seals affixed to the foregoing instrument are the Corporate Seals of the Companies; and that the said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of the Companies by authority of their respective Boards of Directors. Notary Public (Expiration of notary’s commission does not invalidate this instrument) I, Elisabeth Sandersfeld, Secretary of MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY (MUTUAL) and MERCHANTS NATIONAL BONDING, INC., do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the POWER-O F-ATTORNEY executed by said Companies, which is still in full force and effect and has not been amended or revoked. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the Companies on this day of , . Secretary POA 0018 (6/24) 11th 11th 2024 2024 Aileen Geving; Chase Stoneback; Christine Scott; Christopher James; Christopher K Hovden; Danielle Hernandez; Dee Ann Briegel; Gregg K Boomgard; James Erickson; Janet L Roth; John C Klein; Jonathan Lucas; Karla Deutsch Hunt; Kerri Hatton-Rudnik; Kim Neary; Kristin B Schiferl; Larry Sumbs; Lynn M Dvergsten; Rita Carlson; Stephen M Klein; Stewart Yoo December December JanuaryJanuary January JanuaryJanuary January January JanuaryJanuary 29th May 2025 Contractor Affidavit Submitted Thank you, your Contractor Affidavit has been approved. Confirmation Summary Confirmation Number:0-495-288-800 Submitted Date and Time:10-Jun-2025 10:53:08 AM Legal Name:EBERT INC Federal Employer ID:41-0989350 User Who Submitted:ebertmntax Type of Request Submitted:Contractor Affidavit Affidavit Summary Affidavit Number:1796878336 Minnesota ID:6225159 Project Owner:CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE Project Number:66055 Project Begin Date:01-Aug-2024 Project End Date:04-Mar-2025 Project Location:10875 IDEAL AVE S; COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 Project Amount:$445,612.94 Subcontractor Summary Name ID Affidavit Number CARCIOFINI COMPANY 5821025 513093632 COSNEY CORP 4582777 1572745216 NICHE VISUAL 1065922 98447360 MID AMERICA 6921995 1549414400 WARREN DRAPERY 1910606 201666560 TOTAL TOOL SUPPLY 5035678 1004875776 Important Messages A copy of this page must be provided to the contractor or government agency that hired you. Contact Us If you need further assistance, contact our Withholding Tax Division at 651-282-9999, (toll-free) 800-657-3594, or (email) withholding.tax@state.mn.us. Business hours are Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Central Time. Please print this page for your records using the print or save functionality built into your browser. From:MN Revenue e-Services To:Julie Pederson Subject:Your Recent Contractor Affidavit Request Date:Tuesday, June 10, 2025 10:19:35 AM This email is an automated notification and is unable to receive replies. Contractor Affidavit Submitted Thank you, your Contractor Affidavit has been approved. Confirmation Summary Confirmation Number: Submitted Date and Time: Legal Name: Federal Employer ID: User Who Submitted: Type of Request Submitted: Affidavit Summary Affidavit Number:513093632 Minnesota ID:5821025 Project Owner:CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE Project Number:66055 Project Begin Date:30-Oct-2024 Project End Date:05-Jan-2025 Project Location:10875 IDEAL AVE S., COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 Project Amount:$2,650.00 Subcontractors:No Subcontractors Important Messages A copy of this page must be provided to the contractor or government agency that hired you. Contact Us If you need further assistance, contact our Withholding Tax Division at 651-282-9999, (toll-free) 800-657-3594, or (email) withholding.tax@state.mn.us. Business hours are Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Central Time. How to View and Print this Request You can see copies of your requests by going into your History. This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and may contain nonpublic / private data. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, use, or distribution of the information included in this message and any attachments is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us and immediately and permanently delete this message and any attachments. Thank you. Contractor Affidavit Submitted Thank you, your Contractor Affidavit has been approved. Confirmation Summary Confirmation Number:0-618-946-272 Submitted Date and Time:27-May-2025 1:58:18 PM Legal Name:NICHE VISUAL LLC Federal Employer ID:33-3985928 User Who Submitted:nichevisual1 Type of Request Submitted:Contractor Affidavit Affidavit Summary Affidavit Number:98447360 Minnesota ID:1065922 Project Owner:CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE Project Number:66055 Project Begin Date:24-Jan-2024 Project End Date:19-Dec-2024 Project Location:10875 IDEAL AVENUE SOUTH COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 Project Amount:$5,341.85 Subcontractors:No Subcontractors Important Messages A copy of this page must be provided to the contractor or government agency that hired you. Contact Us If you need further assistance, contact our Withholding Tax Division at 651-282-9999, (toll-free) 800-657-3594, or (email) withholding.tax@state.mn.us. Business hours are Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Central Time. Please print this page for your records using the print or save functionality built into your browser. 5/27/25, 1:58 PM mndor.state.mn.us/tp/eservices/_/Retrieve/0/Dc/Eut9sfGgyBEeEy_AseIKQQ__?FILE__=Print2&PARAMS__=5121146171271761240 https://www.mndor.state.mn.us/tp/eservices/_/Retrieve/0/Dc/Eut9sfGgyBEeEy_AseIKQQ__?FILE__=Print2&PARAMS__=5121146171271761240 1/1 616125,2t,i PM mndor.stale.mn.us/tp/eservic€s/_/RotlevB/O/DcJmGtBl.JlSBElYuR6UWFHhKL?FILE-=Pr|nI2&PARAMS-=53'13/.'17456474A54485 WHPARTMEHT oF HHIfENUE Gontractor Affidavit S u bm itted Thank you, your ContractorAffidavit has been approved. Gonfirmation Summary Confirmation Number: Submitted Date and Time: Legal Name: Federal Employer lD: User Who Submitted: Type of Request Submitted Affidavit Summary Affidavit Number: Minnesota lD: Project Owner: . Project Number: Project-Begin Date: Project End Date: Project Location: ProjectAmount: Subcontractors: 2-058-338-016 6-Jun-2025 2:56:40 PM MID AMERICA BUS SYS EQUIPMENT INC 41-1274962 JROTTINGER Contractor Affidavit 1549414400 6921995 CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE 66055 15-Feb-2024 18-Mar-2025 10875 IDEALAVENUE S; COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 $52,038.18 No Subcontractors lmportant Messages A copy of this page must be provided to the contractor or government agency that hired you. Contact Us lf you need further assistanc€, contact our Withholding Tax Oivision at 651-282-9999, (toll-free) 800657-3594, or (email) withholding.tax@stato.mn.us. Business hours are Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Central 'lime. Please g11ghrs-page for your records using the print or save functionality built into your browser. htes:/Ar{ww.mndorstate.mn.us/tp/eservlcestuRetri6VE/O/Dc/mtstBUlSBElYuR6UWFHhKg-?FILE-=Pdnt2&PARAMS-=53134,l7456'47489485 111 1 Candace Green From:Warren Drapery Company <warrendraperycompany@yahoo.com> Sent:Thursday, June 5, 2025 4:08 PM To:Candace Green Cc:warren@businesswindowcoverings.com Subject:Fw: Your Recent Contractor Affidavit Request CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Candace Here is the IC134 for Cottage Grove Utility, closeouts will be sent by Warren (included on this email) Kristin Mann Warren Drapery Company 2905 E. Hennepin Ave Minneapolis, MN 55413 612-877-3200 x 103 fax 612-877-3204 kristin@warrendrapery.com www.warrendrapery.com ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: MN Revenue e-Services <eservices.mdor@state.mn.us> To: "kristin@warrendrapery.com" <kristin@warrendrapery.com> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 at 04:06:27 PM CDT Subject: Your Recent Contractor Affidavit Request This email is an automated notification and is unable to receive replies. Contractor Affidavit Submitted Thank you, your Contractor Affidavit has been approved. Confirmation Summary Confirmation Number: 1-782-578-912 Submitted Date and Time: 5-Jun-2025 4:06:08 PM Legal Name: WARREN DRAPERY COMPANY, LLC Federal Employer ID: 27-4379561 User Who Submitted: warrendrapery Type of Request Submitted: Contractor Affidavit Affidavit Summary Affidavit Number: 201666560 2 Minnesota ID: 1910606 Project Owner: CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE Project Number: 66055 Project Begin Date: 11-Jan-2025 Project End Date: 11-Jan-2025 Project Location: COTTAGE GROVE Project Amount: $6,936.00 Subcontractors: No Subcontractors Important Messages A copy of this page must be provided to the contractor or government agency that hired you. Contact Us If you need further assistance, contact our Withholding Tax Division at 651-282-9999, (toll-free) 800-657-3594, or (email) withholding.tax@state.mn.us. Business hours are Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Central Time. How to View and Print this Request You can see copies of your requests by going into your History. This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and may contain nonpublic / private data. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, use, or distribution of the information included in this message and any attachments is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us and immediately and permanently delete this message and any attachments. Thank you. CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE WHEREAS, the Public Works Director has certified that work has been satisfactorily completed; and WHEREAS, the original total contract amount for Ebert, Inc. dba Ebert Construction was $146,000. The final construction cost was $128,928.80, which is $17,071.20 less than the contract amount. The reduced construction cost was due to scope of work reductions and associated credits back to the City; and WHEREAS, the project has been satisfactorily completed in accordance with the contract plans and specifications. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, $3,818.55 is paid to Ebert Inc. dba Ebert Construction for the final payment for the Utility and Engineering Division Building Project. Passed this 17th day of September, 2025. Myron Bailey, Mayor Attest: Tamara Anderson, City Clerk POWER OF ATTORNEY Know All Persons By These Presents, that MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY (MUTUAL) and MERCHANTS NATIONAL BONDING, INC., both being corporations of the State of Iowa, d/b/a Merchants National Indemnity Company (in California only) (herein collectively called the “Companies”) do hereby make, constitute and appoint, individually, their true and lawful Attorney(s)-in-Fact, to sign its name as surety(ies) and to execute, seal and acknowledge any and all bonds, undertakings, contracts and other written instruments in the nature thereof, on behalf of the Companies in their business of guaranteeing the fidelity of persons, guaranteeing the performance of contracts and executing or guaranteeing bonds and undertakings required or permitted in any actions or proceedings allowed by law. This Power-of-Attorney is granted and is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by authority of the following By-Laws adopted by the Board of Directors of Merchants Bonding Company (Mutual) on April 23, 2011 and amended August 14, 2015 and April 27, 2024 and adopted by the Board of Directors of Merchants National Bonding, Inc., on October 16, 2015 and amended on April 27, 2024. "The President, Secretary, Treasurer, or any Assistant Treasurer or any Assistant Secretary or any Vice President shall have power and authority to appoint Attorneys-in-Fact, and to authorize them to execute on behalf of the Company, and attach the seal of the Company thereto, bonds and undertakings, recognizances, contracts of indemnity and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof.” “The signature of any authorized officer and the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile or electronic transmission to any Power of Attorney or Certification thereof authorizing the execution and delivery of any bond, undertaking, recognizance, or other suretyship o bligations of the Company, and such signature and seal when so used shall have the same force and effect as though manually fixed." In connection with obligations in favor of the Florida Department of Transportation only, it is agreed that the power and aut hority hereby given to the Attorney-in-Fact includes any and all consents for the release of retained percentages and/or final estimates on engineering and construction contracts required by the State of Florida Department of Transportation. It is fully understood that consenting to the State of Florida Department of Transportation making payment of the final estimate to the Contractor and/or its assignee, shall not relieve this surety company of any of i ts obligations under its bond. In connection with obligations in favor of the Kentucky Department of Highways only, it is agreed that the power and authority hereby givento the Attorney-in-Fact cannot be modified or revoked unless prior written personal notice of such intent has been given to the Commissioner-Department of Highways of the Commonwealth of Kentucky at least thirty (30) days prior to the modification or revocation. In Witness Whereof, the Companies have caused this instrument to be signed and sealed this day of , . MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY (MUTUAL) MERCHANTS NATIONAL BONDING, INC. d/b/a MERCHANTS NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY By PresidentSTATE OF IOWA COUNTY OF DALLAS ss. On this day of , before me appeared Larry Taylor, to me personally known, who being by me duly sworn did say that he is President of MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY (MUTUAL) and MERCHANTS NATIONAL BONDING, INC.; and that the seals affixed to the foregoing instrument are the Corporate Seals of the Companies; and that the said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of the Companies by authority of their respective Boards of Directors. Notary Public (Expiration of notary’s commission does not invalidate this instrument) I, Elisabeth Sandersfeld, Secretary of MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY (MUTUAL) and MERCHANTS NATIONAL BONDING, INC., do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the POWER-O F-ATTORNEY executed by said Companies, which is still in full force and effect and has not been amended or revoked. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the Companies on this day of , . Secretary POA 0018 (6/24) 11th 11th 2024 2024 Aileen Geving; Chase Stoneback; Christine Scott; Christopher James; Christopher K Hovden; Danielle Hernandez; Dee Ann Briegel; Gregg K Boomgard; James Erickson; Janet L Roth; John C Klein; Jonathan Lucas; Karla Deutsch Hunt; Kerri Hatton-Rudnik; Kim Neary; Kristin B Schiferl; Larry Sumbs; Lynn M Dvergsten; Rita Carlson; Stephen M Klein; Stewart Yoo December December JanuaryJanuary January JanuaryJanuary January January JanuaryJanuary 29th May 2025 Contractor Affidavit Submitted Thank you, your Contractor Affidavit has been approved. Confirmation Summary Confirmation Number:0-495-288-800 Submitted Date and Time:10-Jun-2025 10:53:08 AM Legal Name:EBERT INC Federal Employer ID:41-0989350 User Who Submitted:ebertmntax Type of Request Submitted:Contractor Affidavit Affidavit Summary Affidavit Number:1796878336 Minnesota ID:6225159 Project Owner:CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE Project Number:66055 Project Begin Date:01-Aug-2024 Project End Date:04-Mar-2025 Project Location:10875 IDEAL AVE S; COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 Project Amount:$445,612.94 Subcontractor Summary Name ID Affidavit Number CARCIOFINI COMPANY 5821025 513093632 COSNEY CORP 4582777 1572745216 NICHE VISUAL 1065922 98447360 MID AMERICA 6921995 1549414400 WARREN DRAPERY 1910606 201666560 TOTAL TOOL SUPPLY 5035678 1004875776 Important Messages A copy of this page must be provided to the contractor or government agency that hired you. Contact Us If you need further assistance, contact our Withholding Tax Division at 651-282-9999, (toll-free) 800-657-3594, or (email) withholding.tax@state.mn.us. Business hours are Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Central Time. Please print this page for your records using the print or save functionality built into your browser. From:MN Revenue e-Services To:Julie Pederson Subject:Your Recent Contractor Affidavit Request Date:Tuesday, June 10, 2025 10:19:35 AM This email is an automated notification and is unable to receive replies. Contractor Affidavit Submitted Thank you, your Contractor Affidavit has been approved. Confirmation Summary Confirmation Number: Submitted Date and Time: Legal Name: Federal Employer ID: User Who Submitted: Type of Request Submitted: Affidavit Summary Affidavit Number:513093632 Minnesota ID:5821025 Project Owner:CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE Project Number:66055 Project Begin Date:30-Oct-2024 Project End Date:05-Jan-2025 Project Location:10875 IDEAL AVE S., COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 Project Amount:$2,650.00 Subcontractors:No Subcontractors Important Messages A copy of this page must be provided to the contractor or government agency that hired you. Contact Us If you need further assistance, contact our Withholding Tax Division at 651-282-9999, (toll-free) 800-657-3594, or (email) withholding.tax@state.mn.us. Business hours are Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Central Time. How to View and Print this Request You can see copies of your requests by going into your History. This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and may contain nonpublic / private data. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, use, or distribution of the information included in this message and any attachments is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us and immediately and permanently delete this message and any attachments. Thank you. Contractor Affidavit Submitted Thank you, your Contractor Affidavit has been approved. Confirmation Summary Confirmation Number:0-618-946-272 Submitted Date and Time:27-May-2025 1:58:18 PM Legal Name:NICHE VISUAL LLC Federal Employer ID:33-3985928 User Who Submitted:nichevisual1 Type of Request Submitted:Contractor Affidavit Affidavit Summary Affidavit Number:98447360 Minnesota ID:1065922 Project Owner:CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE Project Number:66055 Project Begin Date:24-Jan-2024 Project End Date:19-Dec-2024 Project Location:10875 IDEAL AVENUE SOUTH COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 Project Amount:$5,341.85 Subcontractors:No Subcontractors Important Messages A copy of this page must be provided to the contractor or government agency that hired you. Contact Us If you need further assistance, contact our Withholding Tax Division at 651-282-9999, (toll-free) 800-657-3594, or (email) withholding.tax@state.mn.us. Business hours are Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Central Time. Please print this page for your records using the print or save functionality built into your browser. 5/27/25, 1:58 PM mndor.state.mn.us/tp/eservices/_/Retrieve/0/Dc/Eut9sfGgyBEeEy_AseIKQQ__?FILE__=Print2&PARAMS__=5121146171271761240 https://www.mndor.state.mn.us/tp/eservices/_/Retrieve/0/Dc/Eut9sfGgyBEeEy_AseIKQQ__?FILE__=Print2&PARAMS__=5121146171271761240 1/1 616125,2t,i PM mndor.stale.mn.us/tp/eservic€s/_/RotlevB/O/DcJmGtBl.JlSBElYuR6UWFHhKL?FILE-=Pr|nI2&PARAMS-=53'13/.'17456474A54485 WHPARTMEHT oF HHIfENUE Gontractor Affidavit S u bm itted Thank you, your ContractorAffidavit has been approved. Gonfirmation Summary Confirmation Number: Submitted Date and Time: Legal Name: Federal Employer lD: User Who Submitted: Type of Request Submitted Affidavit Summary Affidavit Number: Minnesota lD: Project Owner: . Project Number: Project-Begin Date: Project End Date: Project Location: ProjectAmount: Subcontractors: 2-058-338-016 6-Jun-2025 2:56:40 PM MID AMERICA BUS SYS EQUIPMENT INC 41-1274962 JROTTINGER Contractor Affidavit 1549414400 6921995 CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE 66055 15-Feb-2024 18-Mar-2025 10875 IDEALAVENUE S; COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 $52,038.18 No Subcontractors lmportant Messages A copy of this page must be provided to the contractor or government agency that hired you. Contact Us lf you need further assistanc€, contact our Withholding Tax Oivision at 651-282-9999, (toll-free) 800657-3594, or (email) withholding.tax@stato.mn.us. Business hours are Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Central 'lime. Please g11ghrs-page for your records using the print or save functionality built into your browser. htes:/Ar{ww.mndorstate.mn.us/tp/eservlcestuRetri6VE/O/Dc/mtstBUlSBElYuR6UWFHhKg-?FILE-=Pdnt2&PARAMS-=53134,l7456'47489485 111 1 Candace Green From:Warren Drapery Company <warrendraperycompany@yahoo.com> Sent:Thursday, June 5, 2025 4:08 PM To:Candace Green Cc:warren@businesswindowcoverings.com Subject:Fw: Your Recent Contractor Affidavit Request CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Candace Here is the IC134 for Cottage Grove Utility, closeouts will be sent by Warren (included on this email) Kristin Mann Warren Drapery Company 2905 E. Hennepin Ave Minneapolis, MN 55413 612-877-3200 x 103 fax 612-877-3204 kristin@warrendrapery.com www.warrendrapery.com ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: MN Revenue e-Services <eservices.mdor@state.mn.us> To: "kristin@warrendrapery.com" <kristin@warrendrapery.com> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 at 04:06:27 PM CDT Subject: Your Recent Contractor Affidavit Request This email is an automated notification and is unable to receive replies. Contractor Affidavit Submitted Thank you, your Contractor Affidavit has been approved. Confirmation Summary Confirmation Number: 1-782-578-912 Submitted Date and Time: 5-Jun-2025 4:06:08 PM Legal Name: WARREN DRAPERY COMPANY, LLC Federal Employer ID: 27-4379561 User Who Submitted: warrendrapery Type of Request Submitted: Contractor Affidavit Affidavit Summary Affidavit Number: 201666560 2 Minnesota ID: 1910606 Project Owner: CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE Project Number: 66055 Project Begin Date: 11-Jan-2025 Project End Date: 11-Jan-2025 Project Location: COTTAGE GROVE Project Amount: $6,936.00 Subcontractors: No Subcontractors Important Messages A copy of this page must be provided to the contractor or government agency that hired you. Contact Us If you need further assistance, contact our Withholding Tax Division at 651-282-9999, (toll-free) 800-657-3594, or (email) withholding.tax@state.mn.us. Business hours are Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Central Time. How to View and Print this Request You can see copies of your requests by going into your History. This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and may contain nonpublic / private data. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, use, or distribution of the information included in this message and any attachments is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us and immediately and permanently delete this message and any attachments. Thank you. CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE WHEREAS, the Public Works Director has certified that work has been satisfactorily completed; and WHEREAS, the original total contract amount for Fobbe Electric, Inc. was $933,250. The final construction cost was $1,004,514.23, which is $71,264.23 greater than the contract amount. The increased construction cost was approved by the Council through change orders, and is within the project budgeted contingencies; and WHEREAS, the project has been satisfactorily completed in accordance with the contract plans and specifications. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, that $38,748.00 is paid to Fobbe Electric, Inc. for the final payment for the Utility and Engineering Division Building Project. Passed this 17th day of September, 2025. Myron Bailey, Mayor Attest: Tamara Anderson, City Clerk CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE WHEREAS, the Public Works Director has certified that work has been satisfactorily completed; and WHEREAS, the original total contract amount for Jackson & Associates LLC was $562,427. The final construction cost was $560,077, which is $2,350 less than the contract amount. The reduced construction cost was due to scope of work reductions and associated credits back to the City; and WHEREAS, the project has been satisfactorily completed in accordance with the contract plans and specifications. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, that $8,570.77 is paid to Jackson & Associates LLC for the final payment for the Utility and Engineering Division Building Project. Passed this 17th day of September, 2025. Myron Bailey, Mayor Attest: Tamara Anderson, City Clerk AIA Document G707™ – 1994. Copyright © 1982 and 1994 by The American Institute of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNING: This AIA® Document is protected by U.S. Copyright Law and International Treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this AIA® Document, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law. . User Notes: (1466710072) 1 (Name and address) (Name and address) In accordance with the provisions of the Contract between the Owner and the Contractor as indicated above, the (Insert name and address of Surety) , SURETY, on bond of (Insert name and address of Contractor) , CONTRACTOR, hereby approves of the final payment to the Contractor, and agrees that final payment to the Contractor shall not relieve the Surety of any of its obligations to (Insert name and address of Owner) , OWNER, as set forth in said Surety’s bond. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Surety has hereunto set its hand on this date: (Insert in writing the month followed by the numeric date and year.) (Surety) (Signature of authorized representative) Attest: (Seal): (Printed name and title) ✔ Bond No. 2351309 Work Scope 7-H: Roofing Package In connection with City of Cottage Grove New Utility & Engineering Building, Cottage Grove, MN January 8, 2024 General Construction 1200 Main Street, Suite 800 Kansas City, MO 64105 Jackson & Associates LLC 1817 Buerkle Road White Bear Lake, MN 55110 City of Cottage Grove 12800 Ravine Parkway South Cottage Grove, MN 55016 Swiss Re Corporate Solutions America Insurance Corporation Swiss Re Corporate Solutions America Insurance Corporation Nicole Stillings, Attorney-in-Fact December 27, 2024 Austin Muehlschlegel City of Cottage Grove 12800 Ravine Parkway South, Cottage Grove, MN 55016 Bond No: 27th December 24 CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE WHEREAS, the Public Works Director has certified that work has been satisfactorily completed; and WHEREAS, the original total contract amount for MCI, Inc. dba Multiple Concept Interiors, Inc. was $95,455. The final construction cost was $99,770.50, which is $4,315.50 greater than the contract amount. The increased construction cost was approved by the Council through change orders, and is within the project budgeted contingencies; and WHEREAS, the project has been satisfactorily completed in accordance with the contract plans and specifications. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, that $997.71 is paid to MCI, Inc. dba Multiple Concept Interiors, Inc. for the final payment for the Utility and Engineering Division Building Project. Passed this 17th day of September, 2025. Myron Bailey, Mayor Attest: Tamara Anderson, City Clerk CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE WHEREAS, the Public Works Director has certified that work has been satisfactorily completed; and WHEREAS, the original total contract amount for Spartan Steel Erectors, Inc. was $88,600. The final construction cost was $94,980, which is $6,380 greater than the contract amount. The increased construction cost was approved by the Council through change orders, and is within the project budgeted contingencies; and WHEREAS, the project has been satisfactorily completed in accordance with the contract plans and specifications. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, that $949.80 is paid to Spartan Steel Erectors, Inc. for the final payment for the Utility and Engineering Division Building Project. Passed this 17th day of September, 2025. Myron Bailey, Mayor Attest: Tamara Anderson, City Clerk AIA Document G70$-1994 Contractor's AMdavlt of Payment of Debts and Claims PROJECT:(Name and address) City of Grove —Now Udlity and Building 10875 Ideal South Cot*Grove,55016 TO OWNER:(Name City of Cottage 120 Ravine Soudl 55016 STATE OF:Mlnnesoe COUNTYOF: ARCHITECTS PROJECT NUMBER: 232010 COMTRACTFOR:Work swpø 05-B: S&uctxral Steel Erwtion COMIRACT DATED:January 8,2024 OWNER: ARCHITECT: CONTRACTOR• SURETY:C] OTHER: The undersigned hQby ca•tifiw that,except as below,payment has made in full md all oblWions bnve gaüsfied for all nmedalg and equipmeit firnighed,all wdK,lab(T,and perfonned,md for all krown and against üxeCorfractor for ding in any in with üte of uw above for which Ovmer or Ownæls any way be held raponsible or EXCEPTIONS: SUPPORTNG DOCUWÆNTS xnETO•. Consent of Surmy Final Whenever Surety ig CMIsent of Surety is AIA DocumÄt G707,C,mmt of Surety,may be üiis Cl Yes NoAtucbmønt 7%efoIlawing suppordng documeng should be adached ha•eto tfrquired by the Owner: 2, 3, Cm&actoes Release or of LÄ tvon of paymnt. Sernrce Rel%geg Waiverg from md mateial suppliers,the by the a list Ccm&actoras AMdavit ofR&E of Liens (AIA Document G706A). COYFRACTOR:flame and address) Spartan Inc. 43W MBin st BoniEu,55375 BY: repugnøtive) (Printa name and dtle) swm•n before me this date: Public: My E*u.• Megan Kristine Jochims Notary Public Minnesota' My CommissionExpires January31 ,2027 ALA 104.CowrlghtO 1970 and 104.All •The Arnerlæn In«te "Anwrlæn ARA Logo.and "AIA are tmdernariß of The of (bournøntwa at 0924:u ET on 12.27/2024 unda Ord*whbh 0311212Ü.for Is for one•drne uu mty,ard may mly In with AJA CofiüCt Terns Of TO Øpy&ht e-mdl AIA'Document G70$A-1994 Contractors AMdavlt of Release of Liens ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NUMBER:PROJECT:(Name and address) 232010 and Building 10875 Ideal Avenue South Co&ge Grove,55016 TO OWNER:(Name and addrzs) City of Cottage 128(n R.as,iie South Cottage 55016 STATE OF: COUNTYOF: CONTRACT FOR:Work scope 05-B: StucturaL - CONTRACT DAIED:January 8,2024 OWNER: ARCHITECT: CONTRACTOR:Xl SURETY: OTHER: 'Ihe undersigned to die best of dE knoüige,informadm belM,excqt as below,Releges ofLien anached hereto the all aJ.l supplies and quipnÄ all of Work,services who have may have lions or riÖt asset limg or against any of the arising ia any out per%rmanceofåe Conu•act EXCEPTIONS: SUPPORTING DOCUWÆNTS HERETO: 2, or Waiver ofLÄconditionaluponreceiptoffinal Relæeg from Eid md supplia•s,the by the Ownm, by a fist CONTRACTOR:(Nameandaddress) Inc. 4300 Street St.Btmificius,IvfN 55375 BY: ofaatho (Printed name title) Subg±ed and swom to me on d"e:LIP NotryPubIic: My E*e: Megan Kristine Jochims Notary Public Minnesota CommissionExpiresJanuary 31 2027 AIA Donurmt —1994.1 W4.A1 ArrerWi lnürb of Arch*e.•Ire..rb of Archtbcb,•AAIA.• AIA and "AIA thcurnene are trademarks of The Americzn Thb 8tW25:æ ET on 12Æ7Ä2.4 undr Ord&whbh m 03/12/2025.Is for ree 18 for one-Ume mw mly In the ALA Tame of To vb&ng, AIA Document G70T Consent Of Surety to Final Payment -1994 Bond No.100124893 PROJECT:(Name and address) New Utility and Engineering Building Cottage Grove,Minnesota TO OWNER:(Name and address) City of Cottage Grove 12800 Ravine Parkway South, Cottage Grove,MN 55016 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NUMBER:OWNER: ARCHITECT: CONTRACTOR: SURETY:C] CONTRACT FOR:work scope 05-B:Structural steel -Erection OTHER:Ü CONTRACT DATED:January 8,2024 In accordance with the provisions of the Contract between the Owner and the Contractor as indicated above,the (Insert name and address of Surety) Merchants National Bonding,Inc. P.O.Box 14498, Des Moines,IA 50306-3498 SURETY, on bond of (Insert name and address of Contractor) Spartan Steel Erectors,Inc. 4300 Main Street, Saint Bonifacius,MN 55375 CONTRACTOR hereby approves of the final payment to the Contractor,and agrees that final payment to the Contractor shall not relieve the Surety of any of its obligations to (Insert name and address of Owner) City of Cottage Grove 12800 Ravine Parkway South, Cottage Grove,MN 55016 as set forth in said Surety's bond. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the surety has hereunto set its hand on this date:February 27,2025 OWNER, (Insert in writing the monthfollowedby the numeric date and year.) Witness: (Seal): Merchants National Bonding,Inc. (Surety) (ign ture aut rize representa •ve) Mary Jo Dingwall,Attorney-in-Fact (Printed name and title) AIA Document G707 —1994.Copyright 0 1982 and 1994.All rights reserved."The American Institute of Architects,""American Institute of Architects,""AIA,".theAIALogo,and "AIA Contract Documents"are trademarks of The American Institute of Architects.This document was produced at 10:21 :57 ET on 01/10/2024underOrderNo.4104247169 which expires on 11/28/2024,is not for resale,is licensed for one-time use only,and may only be used in accordance with the AIAContractDocuments'Terms of Service.To report copyright violations,e-mail docinfo@aiacontracts.com.user Notes:(3B9ADA4F) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF CORPORATE SURETY STATE OF Minnesota COUNTY OF Dakota On this 27th day of February before me personally appeared Mary Jo Dingwall2025 to me known,who is being by me duly sworn,did depose that he/she is the aforesaid officer or attorney in fact Of the Merchants National Bonding,Inc.a corporation;that the seal affixed to the foregoing instrument is the corporate seal of said corporation,and that said instrument was signed and sealed on behalf of said corporation by the aforesaid officer,by authority of its board of directors,and the aforesaid officer acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said corporation. SCHMIDT Notary Public Minnesota My Commission Expires 1131/2028 (Notarial Seal) z4,/m6/E Notary Public,Scott County,Minnesota My Commission Expires January 31,2028 BONDING COMPANYw POWER OF ATTORNEY Know All Persons By These Presents,that MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY (MUTUAL)and MERCHANTS NATIONAL BONDING,INC., both being corporations Of the State of Iowa,d/b/a Merchants National Indemnity Company (in California only)(herein collectively called the "Companies")do hereby make,constitute and appoint,individually, Daniel A Kampf;Jonathon Diessner;Mark N Kampf;Mary Jo Dingwall;Matthew Schmidt;Rocklyn C Bullis;Thomas M Reuder;Yaralitza Rivas their true and lawful Attorney(s)-in-Fact,to sign its name as surety(ies)and to execute,seal and acknowledge any and all bonds,undertakings, contracts and other written instruments in the nature thereof,on behalf of the Companies in their business of guaranteeing the fidelity of persons,guaranteeing the performance of contracts and executing or guaranteeing bonds and undertakings required or permitted in any actions or proceedings allowed by law. This Power-of-Attorney is granted and is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by authority of the following By-Laws adopted by the Board of Directors of Merchants Bonding Company (Mutual)on April 23,2011 and amended August 14,2015 and April 27,2024 and adopted by the Board of Directors of Merchants National Bonding,Inc.,on October 16,2015 and amended on April 27,2024. "The President,Secretary,Treasurer,or any Assistant Treasurer or any Assistant Secretary or any Vice President shall have power and authority to appoint Attorneys-in-Fact,and to authorize them to execute on behalf of the Company,and attach the seal of the Company thereto, bonds and undertakings,recognizances,contracts of indemnity and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof." "The signature of any authorized officer and the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile or electronic transmission to any Power of Attorney or Certification thereof authorizing the execution and delivery of any bond,undertaking,recognizance,or other suretyship obligations of the Company,and such signature and seal when so used shall have the same force and effect as though manually fixed." In connection with obligations in favor of the Florida Department of Transportation only,it is agreed that the power and aut hority hereby given to the Attorney-in-Fact includes any and all consents for the release of retained percentages and/or final estimates on engineering and construction contracts required by the State of Florida Department of Transportation.It is fully understood that consenting to the State of Florida Department ofTransportation making payment of the final estimate to the Contractor and/or its assignee,shall not relieve this surety company of any of its obligations under its bond. In connection with obligations in favor of the Kentucky Department of Highways only,it is agreed that the power and authority hereby given to the Attorney-in-Fact cannot be modified or revoked unless prior written personal notice of such intent has been given to the Commissioner- Department of Highways of the Commonwealth of Kentucky at least thirty (30)days prior to the modification or revocation. In Witness Whereof,the Companies have caused this instrument to be signed and sealed this 21st day of November ,2024 MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY (MUTUAL) MERCHANTS NATIONAL BONDING,INC. dib/a MERCHANTS NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY 2003 STATE OF IOWA COUNTY OF DALLAS ss. •1933 By President before me appeared Larry Taylor,to me personally known,who being by me duly swornOnthis21stdayof2024November did say that he is President of MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY (MUTUAL)and MERCHANTS NATIONAL BONDING,INC.,and that the seals affixed to the foregoing instrument are the Corporate Seals of the Companies;and that the said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of the Companies by authority of their respective Boards of Directors. Penni Miller c Commission Number 787952 IOWA My Commission Expires January 20,2027 Notaty Public (Expiration of notary's commission does not invalidate this instrument) l,Elisabeth Sandersfeld,Secretary of MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY (MUTUAL)and MERCHANTS NATIONAL BONDING,INC.,do hereby certify that the above and foregcing is a true and correct copy of the POWER-OF-ATTORNEYexecuted by said Companies,which is still in full force and effect and has not been amended or revoked. In Witness Whereof,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the Companies on this 27tht day of February ,2025 is••..2003 POA 0018 (6/24) •1933 Secretary 2/27/25,1:56 PM mndor.state.mn.us/tp/eservices/_/Retrieve/0/Dc/4fC5aG5FlzJBHv7nKpmiSQ DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE ?FILE =5765588506763099472 Contractor Affidavit Submitted Thank you,your Contractor Affidavit has been approved. Confirmation Summary Confirmation Number: Submitted Date and Time: Legal Name: Federal Employer ID: User Who Submitted: Type of Request Submitted: Affidavit Summary Affidavit Number: Minnesota ID: Project Owner: Project Number: Project Begin Date: Project End Date: Project Location: Project Amount: Subcontractors: Important Messages 0-105-155-296 27-Feb-2025 1:56:23 PM SPARTAN STEEL ERECTORS INC SpartanSteel Contractor Affidavit 1724395520 4762244 CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE 2403 10-Jun-2024 14-Nov-2024 COTTAGE GROVE,MN $94,980.00 No Subcontractors A copy of this page must be provided to the contractor or government agency that hired you. Contact Us If you need further assistance,contact our Withholding Tax Division at 651-282-9999,(toll-free)800-657-3594,or (email) withholding.tax@state.mn.us.Business hours are Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m.to 4:30 p.m.Central Time. Please for your records using the print or save functionality built into your browser. https://www.mndor.state.mn.us/tp/eservices/_/Retrieve/O/Dc/4fC5aG5FIzJBHv7nKpmiSQ 'FILE =5765588506763099472 1/1 1 City Council Action Request 7.L. Meeting Date 9/17/2025 Department Engineering Agenda Category Action Item Title Utilities and Engineering Division Building - Kraus Anderson Change Order #1 and Final Payment Staff Recommendation Approve the KA GMP Reduction Change Order #1 in the amount of $665,642.45 for the Utilities and Engineering Division Building and adopt resolution 2025-132 approving the final payment for the Utilities and Engineering Division Building in the amount of $300,454.59 to Kraus Anderson Construction Company. Budget Implication $300,454.59 - Water and Sewer Utility Funds and Bonds Attachments 1. 01 Memo - Utilities and Engineering Building Change Order 1_revised 2. 02 CGUB Owner Change Order #1 3. 03CGUE_CM At-Risk Contractor Summary Letter 4. 04 2310312 PA #15 revised 5. 05 Final Payment Kraus Anderson_revised 6. KA AIA G707 7. KA MNIC134 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From: Ryan Burfeind, P.E., Public Works Director Date: September 17, 2025 Re: Utilities and Engineering Division Building Project: Guaranteed Maximum Price Reduction – Change Order #1 and Final Payment Background/ Discussion The construction of the Utilities and Engineering Division Building is complete. The City’s contract with Kraus Anderson, which is a Construction Manager at Risk relationship, includes a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) for the project. The GMP for the project (that part of the project including the Kraus Anderson contractors; recall that seven contractors were contracted directly with the City) was $8,720,425. The GMP was split between the construction work ($6,940,405) and KA Project Requirements ($1,533,393). The KA project requirements included $705,853 for CM Site Services, a $500,000 contingency, and $200,000 for General Conditions, with building permit and insurance allocations making up the balance. The unused portions of the project requirements budget results in a GMP reduction of $665,642.45. The majority of this amount is from unused contingency. Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve the KA GMP Reduction Change Order #1 in the amount of $665,642.45 for the Utilities and Engineering Division Building and adopt resolution 2025-132 approving the final payment for the Utilities and Engineering Division Building in the amount of $300,454.59 to Kraus Anderson. Owner Change Order Minneapolis, MN 55404 501 South Eighth Street Project: 2310312-City of Cottage Grove New Utility & Engineering Building Contract Number: 10875 Ideal Ave S Cottage Grove, MN 55016 Change Order #: Minneapolis, MN 55404 Change Order Date: 2310312- Cottage Grove UE Building 07/30/25 THE CONTRACT IS CHANGED AS FOLLOWS: (Include, where applicable, any undisputed amount attributable to previously executed Construction Change Directives) Amount Kraus-Anderson Construction Company 501 South Eighth Street 1 COR Description ($665,642.45) 40.00 KA GMP Reduction Deduct: 0.00 Total For Change Order: 1 ($665,642.45)Deduct: $8,720,425.00 The net change by previously authorized Change Orders was . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $8,720,425.00 $8,054,782.55 The Contract time will be increased by 0 days. The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is 1/17/2025 Accepted By Contractor:Architect/Engineer:Authorized By Owner: Kraus-Anderson Construction CompanyCity Of Cottage Grove 12800 Ravine Parkway South Cottage Grove, MN 55016 Minneapolis, MN 55404 By: _______________________ Date: _____________________ By: _______________________By: _______________________ Date: _____________________Date: _____________________ Wold Architects & Engineers 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 2250 Minneapolis, MN 55402 $0.00 501 South Eighth Street ($665,642.45) Page 1 Kraus-Anderson Construction 501 South 8th Street Minneapolis, MN 55404 Phone: (612) 332-7281 Web: www.krausanderson.com August 28, 2025 Ryan Burfeind, PE Public Works Director City of Cottage Grove 12800 Ravine Parkway South Cottage Grove, MN 55016 Re: CM At-Risk Contract Summary Letter City of Cottage Grove Utility & Engineering Building 10795 Ideal Avenue South Cottage Grove, Minnesota Dear Mr. Burfeind, We respectfully present the following summary of CM At-Risk subcontracts through project completion for the Cottage Grove City Council meeting on September 3, 2025: Work Scope CMa Contractor Original Contract Amount Final Contract Amount 03A Axel H. Ohman, Inc. $958,316.00 $973,505.00 03B Molin Concrete Products Company $1,114,740.00 $1,143,251.00 05A Construction Systems, Inc. $489,975.00 $501,229.00 07D Swanson & Youngdale, Inc. $28,550.00 $30,143.00 08A Bredemus Hardware Company, Inc. $137,282.00 $157,706.75 08D Crawford Door Sales Company Twin Cities, Inc. $91,100.00 $91,100.00 08F Northern Glass & Glazing, Inc. $249,778.00 $235,128.00 09A Commercial Drywall, Inc. $234,795.00 $229,376.20 09B Commercial Flooring Services, LLC $99,568.00 $99,568.00 09C Twin City Acoustics, Inc. $33,400.00 $34,953.13 09K Steinbrecher Painting Company $116,175.00 $110,555.50 21A Nova Fire Protection, Inc. $123,585.00 $123,585.00 Page 2 23B St. Cloud Refrigeration, Inc. dba SCR Central Division $2,446,770.00 $2,434,482.77 31A Miller Excavating, Inc. $568,371.00 $561,210.99 32A McNamara Contracting, Inc. $248,000.00 $216,326.78 The work from these contractors is complete and we recommend the approval of the final payments for each contractor. The final costs for each contractor are shown in the table above. Attached are the final pay requests along with the required IC-134 forms, lien waivers and Consent of Surety to Final Payment. The total of the fifteen contracts as bid, is $6,940,405.00. The final cost for these contracts is $6,942,121.12. The additional costs, $1,716.12, which were previously approved by the Council through change orders, are within the project budgeted contingencies. Overages and credits are due to various additional, necessary, miscellaneous items or scope removal addressed during construction. We have reviewed the work of these contractors with city staff and have found it to be acceptable. The work will be reviewed again within the contracts warranty period and any issues will be addressed under the project warranty with the contractor(s). Sincerely, Kraus-Anderson Construction Ben Albrecht Assistant Project Manager Kraus-Anderson Construction cc: Lee Mann, Stantec Dan Kjellberg, Kraus-Anderson Construction Rachel Struckman, Kraus-Anderson Construction Docusign Envelope ID: 548D6904-D579-4367-8042-903AC3C45F90 9/11/2025 | 2:46 PM CDT Docusign Envelope ID: 548D6904-D579-4367-8042-903AC3C45F90 CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works has certified that work has been satisfactorily completed; and WHEREAS, the original total contract amount was $6,940,405.00. The final con- struction cost was $6,942,121.12, which is $1,716.12 more than the contract amount. The increased construction cost was due to various additional necessary items; and WHEREAS, the project has been satisfactorily completed in accordance with the contract plans and specifications. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, that $300,454.59 is paid to Kraus Anderson Construction Company for the final payment for the Utilities and Engineering Division Building Project. Passed this 17th day of September, 2025. Myron Bailey, Mayor Attest: Tamara Anderson, City Clerk Contractor Affidavit Submitted Thank you, your Contractor Affidavit has been approved. Confirmation Summary Confirmation Number:1-684-416-992 Submitted Date and Time:31-Jul-2025 1:55:42 PM Legal Name:KRAUS ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION CO Federal Employer ID:41-0808757 User Who Submitted:maria.gutierrez Type of Request Submitted:Contractor Affidavit Affidavit Summary Affidavit Number:705114112 Minnesota ID:9054104 Project Owner:CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE Project Number:2310312 Project Begin Date:13-May-2024 Project End Date:01-Jul-2025 Project Location:10875 IDEAL AVE S COTTAGE GROVE MN 55016 Project Amount:$8,054,782.55 Subcontractor Summary Name ID Affidavit Number AXEL H OHMAN INC 8628381 1330327552 MOLIN CONCRETE PRODUCTS 8248951 1773023232 SWANSON & YOUNGDALE INC 8512175 1185820672 CRAWFORD DOOR COMPANY SALES 9046070 2130227200 NORTHERN GLASS & GLAZING INC 1793304 871510016 COMMERCIAL DRYWALL INC 1499766 699805696 COMMERCIAL FLOORING SERVICES LLC 7838004 1903767552 TWIN CITY ACOUSTICS INC 6235068 30027776 STEINBRECHER PAINTING COMPANY INC 4230890 453849088 NOVA FIRE PROTECTION INC 8143583 1061236736 ST CLOUD REFRIGERATION INC 8624447 669921280 MILLER EXCAVATING INC 9363164 1288581120 7/31/25, 1:55 PM mndor.state.mn.us/tp/eservices/_/Retrieve/0/Dc/CUdcluqSs0xcrU84_LF7dg__?FILE__=Print2&PARAMS__=7324993430730003988 https://www.mndor.state.mn.us/tp/eservices/_/Retrieve/0/Dc/CUdcluqSs0xcrU84_LF7dg__?FILE__=Print2&PARAMS__=7324993430730003988 1/2 MCNAMARA CONTRACTING INC 1525665 2053386240 Important Messages A copy of this page must be provided to the contractor or government agency that hired you. Contact Us If you need further assistance, contact our Withholding Tax Division at 651-282-9999, (toll-free) 800-657-3594, or (email) withholding.tax@state.mn.us. Business hours are Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Central Time. Please print this page for your records using the print or save functionality built into your browser. 7/31/25, 1:55 PM mndor.state.mn.us/tp/eservices/_/Retrieve/0/Dc/CUdcluqSs0xcrU84_LF7dg__?FILE__=Print2&PARAMS__=7324993430730003988 https://www.mndor.state.mn.us/tp/eservices/_/Retrieve/0/Dc/CUdcluqSs0xcrU84_LF7dg__?FILE__=Print2&PARAMS__=7324993430730003988 2/2 1 City Council Action Request 7.M. Meeting Date 9/17/2025 Department Engineering Agenda Category Action Item Title Wells 9 and 11 Interim Treatment Facilities Project - Final Payment Staff Recommendation Adopt the attached resolution 2025-123 authorizing the final payment in the amount of $177,184.37 to Rice Lake Construction Group for the Well 9 and 11 Interim Treatment Facilities project. Budget Implication $177,184.37 - 3M Settlement Funds Attachments 1. 01 Memo - Wells 9 and 11 Interim Treatment Plants Final Payment 2. 02 Final Payment Resolution 3. 03 let_projectcloseout_wells9-11wtp_cottagegrove_20250827 4. 04 payapplication07_wells9-11interimwatertreatment_cottagegrove_20250821 5. 05 IC134's 6. 06 FINAL Signed Lien Waivers To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From: Ryan Burfeind, P.E., Public Works Director Date: September 17, 2025 Re: Wells 9 and 11 Interim Treatment Facilities Project – Final Payment Background/ Discussion During 2024, the City constructed the Wells 9 and 11 Interim Treatment Facilities to remove PFAS from municipal supply wells using Ion Exchange technology. In order to be prepared to meet peak season pumping demands, this project was awarded and constructed under the Emergency Declaration Resolution 2017-075. This same process was followed for the previous five interim water treatment facilities, without this accelerated schedule, significant City-wide water restrictions would have been necessary in the summer of 2024. The project is funded by the 3M Settlement. Rice Lake Construction Group has completed the project for the final amount of $2,775,952.19. Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution 2025-123 authorizing the final payment in the amount of $177,184.37 to Rice Lake Construction Group for the Well 9 and 11 Interim Treatment Facilities project. CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE WHEREAS, the Public Works Director has certified that work has been satisfactorily completed; and WHEREAS, the revised contract amount was $2,819,414.81. The final con- struction cost was $2,775,952.19, which is $43,462.62 less than the contract amount. The reduced construction cost was due to lower site work costs; and WHEREAS, the project has been satisfactorily completed in accordance with the contract plans and specifications. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, that $177,184.37 is paid to Rice Lake Construction Group for the final payment for the Wells 9 & 11 Interim Treatment Facilities Project. Passed this 17th day of September, 2025. Myron Bailey, Mayor Attest: Tamara Anderson, City Clerk Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 1000 Minneapolis MN 55402-2314 August 27, 2025 Project/File: 193806663 City of Cottage Grove Ryan Burfeind Public Works Director 8635 W Point Douglas Road S Cottage Grove, MN 55016 Dear Ryan, Reference: Wells 9 & 11 Interim Water Treatment Facilities Transmitted herewith is Payment No. 7/Final, IC-134 forms, and Lien Waivers for the Wells 9 & 11 Interim Water Treatment Facilities. The work on this project has been satisfactorily completed by Rice Lake Construction Group and we recommend final payment in the amount of $177,184.37 at this time. The final pay request releases the project retainage in full. The awarded contract amount was $2,664,400.00. There were two change orders for this project totaling $155,014.81. The revised contract amount is $2,819,414.81. The final amount for this project is $2,775,952.19 which is $43,462.62 under the revised contract amount. If you have any questions regarding this project, please feel free to call me at 320-333-6825. Regards, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Brian Lintgen PE (MN) Senior Associate Phone: (612) 712-2041 Mobile: (320) 333-6825 brian.lintgen@stantec.com Attachment: Pay Request No. 7/Final; Project IC-134 Forms and Lien Wavers c. Lee Mann, Stantec Contractor's Application for Payment No. Application 7 - FINAL Application Date: Period: To From (Contractor): Via (Engineer): (Owner): Project: Contract: Owner's Contract No.: Contractor's Project No.:Engineer's Project No.: 1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT PRICE...........................................................................$ 2. Net change by Change Orders......................................................................................$ 3. Current Contract Price (Line 1 ± 2)................................................................................................$ 4. TOTAL COMPLETED AND STORED TO DATE (Column F total on Progress Estimates).............................................................................................................$ 5. RETAINAGE: a. X $2,775,952.19 Work Completed..............................................$ b. X Stored Material..............................................$ c.Total Retainage (Line 5.a + Line 5.b).........................................................................................................................................$ 6. AMOUNT ELIGIBLE TO DATE (Line 4 - Line 5.c)....................................................................................................................$ 7. LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS (Line 6 from prior Application).........................................................................................................$ 8. AMOUNT DUE THIS APPLICATION....................................................................................................................................$ 9. BALANCE TO FINISH, PLUS RETAINAGE (Line 3 - Line 6).....................................................................................................$ Contractor's Certification Payment of: $ is recommended by: Payment of: $ is approved by: Contractor Signature By: Date: Approved by: Approved Change Orders Application For Payment Change Order Summary Number 1 Deductions $28,326.812 Wells 9 & 11 Interim Water Treatment Facilities City of Cottage Grove Rice Lake Construction Group 2403 08/01/2024-08/21/2025 8/21/2025 Stantec 193806663 $2,775,952.19 7 - FINAL Wells 9 & 11 Interim Water Treatment Facilities Additions $126,688.00 $2,664,400.00 $155,014.81 $2,819,414.81 $177,184.37 (Line 8 or other - attach explanation of the other amount) (Date) Funding or Financing Entity (if applicable) (Owner) (Date) (Line 8 or other - attach explanation of the other amount) $2,598,767.82 $177,184.37 $43,462.62 (Engineer) $2,775,952.19 $177,184.37 (Date) CHANGE ORDERS TOTALS $155,014.81NET CHANGE BY $155,014.81 The undersigned Contractor certifies, to the best of its knowledge, the following: (1) All previous progress payments received from Owner on account of Work done under the Contract have been applied on account to discharge Contractor's legitimate obligations incurred in connection with the Work covered by prior Applications for Payment; (2) Title to all Work, materials and equipment incorporated in said Work, or otherwise listed in or covered by this Application for Payment, will pass to Owner at time of payment free and clear of all Liens, security interests, and encumbrances (except such as are covered by a bond acceptable to Owner indemnifying Owner against any such Liens, security interest, or encumbrances); and (3) All the Work covered by this Application for Payment is in accordance with the Contract Documents and is not defective. EJCDC® C-620 Contractor's Application for Payment © 2013 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved. Page 1 of 1 Progress Estimate - Unit Price Work Contractor's Application PART A - WELL 9 PART 1A - FOUNDATIONS WELL 9 1A 1.00 LUMP SUM $45,000.00 $45,000.00 1.00 $45,000.00 $45,000.00 100.0% 1A 1.00 LUMP SUM $119,000.00 $119,000.00 1.00 $119,000.00 $119,000.00 100.0% PART 2A - BUILDING SHELL WELL 9 2A 1.00 LS $240,000.00 $240,000.00 1.00 $240,000.00 $240,000.00 100.0% PART 3A - PROCESS MECHANICAL WELL 9 3A 1.00 LS $230,000.00 $230,000.00 1.00 $230,000.00 $230,000.00 100.0% 3A 1.00 LS $30,000.00 $30,000.00 1.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 100.0% 3A 1.00 LS $50,000.00 $50,000.00 1.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 100.0% 3A 1.00 LS $20,000.00 $20,000.00 0.83105 $16,621.00 $16,621.00 83.1% PART 4A - ELECTRICAL WELL 9 4A 1.00 LS $156,000.00 $156,000.00 1.00 $156,000.00 $156,000.00 100.0% 4A 1.00 LS $15,000.00 $15,000.00 0.91249733 $13,687.46 $13,687.46 91.2% PART 5A - PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL9 5A 1.00 LS $22,000.00 $22,000.00 1.00 $22,000.00 $22,000.00 100.0% 5A 1.00 LS $33,000.00 $33,000.00 1.00 $33,000.00 $33,000.00 100.0% PART 6A - DRIVEWAY, WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER & EROSION CONTROL WELL 9 GENERAL WELL 9 8 1 LS $ 20,000.00 $20,000.00 1.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 100.0% 9 1 LS $ 3,000.00 $3,000.00 1.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 100.0% 10 10 HR $ 90.00 $900.00 11 1.0 AC $ 6,500.00 $6,500.00 0.60 $3,900.00 $3,900.00 60.0% 12 1450 LF $ 3.00 $4,350.00 13 1450 LF $ 6.00 $8,700.00 1,535.47 $9,212.82 $9,212.82 105.9% EARTHWORK PLUMBING SEDIMENT CONTROL LOGS (TYPE COMPOST) SILT FENCE (MACHINE SLICED) TEMPORARY HYDRAULIC MATRIX STREET SWEEPER WITH OPERATOR TRAFFIC CONTROL MOBILIZATION CARTRIDGE FILTERS CONCRETE SERVICE ALLOWANCE FLOW METERS ELECTRICAL WORK Estimated Quantity Installed Value of Work Installed to Date Materials Presently Stored (not in C) Total Completed and Stored to Date (D + E) HVAC BUILDING SHELL WELL #9 PROCESS PIPING AND VALVES UNFORSEEN CONDITIONS Wells 9 & 11 Interim Water Treatment Facilities 7 - FINAL 08/01/2024-08/21/2025 8/21/2025 A B C D E F For (Contract): Application Number: Application Date:Application Period: % (F / B) Bid Item No. Description Contract Information Item Quantity Units Unit Price Total Value of Item ($) Item EJCDC® C-620 Contractor's Application for Payment © 2013 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved. Page 1 of 6 Progress Estimate - Unit Price Work Contractor's Application Estimated Quantity Installed Value of Work Installed to Date Materials Presently Stored (not in C) Total Completed and Stored to Date (D + E) Wells 9 & 11 Interim Water Treatment Facilities 7 - FINAL 08/01/2024-08/21/2025 8/21/2025 A B C D E F For (Contract): Application Number: Application Date:Application Period: % (F / B) Bid Item No. Description Contract Information Item Quantity Units Unit Price Total Value of Item ($) Item 14 20 CY $ 180.00 $3,600.00 20.00 $3,600.00 $3,600.00 100.0% 15 1.0 AC $ 7,500.00 $7,500.00 1.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 100.0% 16 200 LB $ 5.00 $1,000.00 200.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 100.0% 17 1.0 AC $ 11,000.00 $11,000.00 1.00 $11,000.00 $11,000.00 100.0% 18 680 CY $ 40.00 $27,200.00 680.00 $27,200.00 $27,200.00 100.0% 19 8 EA $ 1,600.00 $12,800.00 8.00 $12,800.00 $12,800.00 100.0% 20 2 EA $ 750.00 $1,500.00 5.00 $3,750.00 $3,750.00 250.0% 21 0.25 AC $ 18,000.00 $4,500.00 0.17 $3,060.00 $3,060.00 68.0% SANITARY SEWER WELL 9 22 480 LF $ 3.00 $1,440.00 23 480 LF $ 7.00 $3,360.00 453.00 $3,171.00 $3,171.00 94.4% 24 480 LF $ 92.00 $44,160.00 453.00 $41,676.00 $41,676.00 94.4% 25 1 EA $ 1,800.00 $1,800.00 1.00 $1,800.00 $1,800.00 100.0% 26 20 LF $ 1,000.00 $20,000.00 18.87 $18,870.00 $18,870.00 94.4% 27 1 EA $ 690.00 $690.00 1.00 $690.00 $690.00 100.0% WATERMAIN WELL 9 28 20 LF $ 42.00 $840.00 12.50 $525.00 $525.00 62.5% 29 20 LF $ 32.00 $640.00 30 330 LF $ 3.00 $990.00 31 10 LF $ 150.00 $1,500.00 7.00 $1,050.00 $1,050.00 70.0% 32 300 LF $ 168.00 $50,400.00 294.50 $49,476.00 $49,476.00 98.2% 33 20 LF $ 440.00 $8,800.00 14.00 $6,160.00 $6,160.00 70.0% 34 1 LF $ 3,250.00 $3,250.00 1.00 $3,250.00 $3,250.00 100.0% CONIFEROUS TREE 12' HT B&B 24" DIP WATER MAIN, CL. 52, INCL. POLY WRAP 6" GATE VALVE & BOX CLEARING AND GRUBBING CLEARING AND GRUBBING 12" DIP WATER MAIN, CL. 52, INCL. POLY WRAP 7 INCH CONCRETE HYDRANT ACCESS PAD 6" DIP WATER MAIN, CL. 52, INCL. POLY WRAP TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SALVAGED TOPSOIL BORROW (LV) EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (CATEGORY 0) SEED MIXTURE 25-151 SEEDING IMPROVED PIPE FOUNDATION TELEVISE SANITARY SEWER 8" PVC SANITARY SEWER PIPE, SDR 35 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER PIPE 4' DIA SANITARY MH, INCL. R-1642-B CSTG AND HDPE ADJ. RINGS 8" PVC PLUG REMOVE WATERMAIN 6 INCH CONCRETE HYDRANT ACCESS PAD EJCDC® C-620 Contractor's Application for Payment © 2013 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved. Page 2 of 6 Progress Estimate - Unit Price Work Contractor's Application Estimated Quantity Installed Value of Work Installed to Date Materials Presently Stored (not in C) Total Completed and Stored to Date (D + E) Wells 9 & 11 Interim Water Treatment Facilities 7 - FINAL 08/01/2024-08/21/2025 8/21/2025 A B C D E F For (Contract): Application Number: Application Date:Application Period: % (F / B) Bid Item No. Description Contract Information Item Quantity Units Unit Price Total Value of Item ($) Item 35 2 LF $ 6,250.00 $12,500.00 2.00 $12,500.00 $12,500.00 100.0% 36 1 LF $ 18,000.00 $18,000.00 1.00 $18,000.00 $18,000.00 100.0% 37 1 LF $ 10,000.00 $10,000.00 1.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 100.0% 38 1400 LF $ 12.00 $16,800.00 1,592.00 $19,104.00 $19,104.00 113.7% 39 2 LF $ 15,000.00 $30,000.00 2.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 100.0% STREETS WELL 9 40 80 SY $ 8.00 $640.00 138.33 $1,106.64 $1,106.64 172.9% 41 30 LF $ 5.00 $150.00 30.00 $150.00 $150.00 100.0% 42 60 LF $ 15.00 $900.00 79.00 $1,185.00 $1,185.00 131.7% 43 10 LF $ 3.00 $30.00 4.00 $12.00 $12.00 40.0% 44 310 CY $ 24.00 $7,440.00 310.00 $7,440.00 $7,440.00 100.0% 45 185 CY $ 42.00 $7,770.00 185.00 $7,770.00 $7,770.00 100.0% 46 250 TN $ 40.00 $10,000.00 224.64 $8,985.60 $8,985.60 89.9% 47 45 TN $ 222.00 $9,990.00 51.35 $11,399.70 $11,399.70 114.1% 48 60 TN $ 222.00 $13,320.00 66.73 $14,814.06 $14,814.06 111.2% 49 25 GL $ 5.00 $125.00 25.00 $125.00 $125.00 100.0% 50 80 LF $ 70.00 $5,600.00 80.00 $5,600.00 $5,600.00 100.0% 8" AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5, 100% CRUSHED LIMESTONE 1.5" TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,C) - SPECIAL DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS 12" BUTTERFLY VALVE & BOX 24" BUTTERFLY VALVE & BOX 2" TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,C) BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT B618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER SAWING CURB & GUTTER COMMON EXCAVATION (EV) 12" AGGREGATE BACKFILL SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER HYDRANT CONNECT TO EXISTING 24" WATER MAIN REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT EJCDC® C-620 Contractor's Application for Payment © 2013 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved. Page 3 of 6 Progress Estimate - Unit Price Work Contractor's Application Estimated Quantity Installed Value of Work Installed to Date Materials Presently Stored (not in C) Total Completed and Stored to Date (D + E) Wells 9 & 11 Interim Water Treatment Facilities 7 - FINAL 08/01/2024-08/21/2025 8/21/2025 A B C D E F For (Contract): Application Number: Application Date:Application Period: % (F / B) Bid Item No. Description Contract Information Item Quantity Units Unit Price Total Value of Item ($) Item PART B - WELL 11 PART 1B - FOUNDATIONS WELL 11 1B 1.00 LUMP SUM $73,000.00 $73,000.00 1.00 $73,000.00 $73,000.00 100.0% 1B 1.00 LUMP SUM $100,000.00 $100,000.00 1.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 100.0% PART 2B - BUILDING SHELL WELL 11 2B 1.00 LUMP SUM $282,000.00 $282,000.00 1.00 $282,000.00 $282,000.00 100.0% PART 3B - PROCESS MECHANICAL WELL 11 3B 1.00 LUMP SUM $230,000.00 $230,000.00 1.00 $230,000.00 $230,000.00 100.0% 3B 1.00 LUMP SUM $30,000.00 $30,000.00 1.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 100.0% 3B 1.00 LS $50,000.00 $50,000.00 1.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 100.0% 3B 1.00 LUMP SUM $20,000.00 $20,000.00 0.6040155 $12,080.31 $12,080.31 60.4% PART 4B - ELECTRICAL WELL 11 4B 1.00 LS $158,000.00 $158,000.00 1.00 $158,000.00 $158,000.00 PART 5B - PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL WELL 11 5B 1.00 LS $22,000.00 $22,000.00 1.00 $22,000.00 $22,000.00 100.0% 5B 1.00 LS $33,000.00 $33,000.00 1.00 $33,000.00 $33,000.00 100.0% PART 6B - DRIVEWAY, WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER & EROSION CONTROL WELL 11 GENERAL WELL 11 57 1 LS $ 20,000.00 $20,000.00 1.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 100.0% 58 1 LS $ 3,000.00 $3,000.00 1.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 100.0% 59 20 HR $ 90.00 $1,800.00 60 0.4 AC $ 7,600.00 $3,040.00 61 420 LF $ 4.00 $1,680.00 62 420 LF $ 6.00 $2,520.00 420.00 $2,520.00 $2,520.00 100.0% 63 20 CY $ 180.00 $3,600.00 SILT FENCE (MACHINE SLICED) SEDIMENT CONTROL LOGS (TYPE COMPOST) TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE MOBILIZATION TRAFFIC CONTROL WITH DETOUR STREET SWEEPER WITH OPERATOR TEMPORARY HYDRAULIC MATRIX HVAC FLOW METERS BUILDING SHELL WELL #11 CARTRIDGE FILTERS PROCESS PIPING AND VALVES UNFORSEEN CONDITIONS ELECTRICAL WORK PLUMBING EARTHWORK CONCRETE EJCDC® C-620 Contractor's Application for Payment © 2013 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved. Page 4 of 6 Progress Estimate - Unit Price Work Contractor's Application Estimated Quantity Installed Value of Work Installed to Date Materials Presently Stored (not in C) Total Completed and Stored to Date (D + E) Wells 9 & 11 Interim Water Treatment Facilities 7 - FINAL 08/01/2024-08/21/2025 8/21/2025 A B C D E F For (Contract): Application Number: Application Date:Application Period: % (F / B) Bid Item No. Description Contract Information Item Quantity Units Unit Price Total Value of Item ($) Item 64 6 EA $ 200.00 $1,200.00 5.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 83.3% 65 0.3 AC $ 6,500.00 $1,950.00 0.30 $1,950.00 $1,950.00 100.0% 66 60 LB $ 5.00 $300.00 46.00 $230.00 $230.00 76.7% 67 0.3 AC $ 9,800.00 $2,940.00 0.30 $2,940.00 $2,940.00 100.0% 68 220 CY $ 50.00 $11,000.00 220.00 $11,000.00 $11,000.00 100.0% 69 6 EA $ 1,600.00 $9,600.00 6.00 $9,600.00 $9,600.00 100.0% 70 6 EA $ 750.00 $4,500.00 6.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 100.0% SANITARY SEWER WELL 11 71 220 LF $ 44.00 $9,680.00 214.00 $9,416.00 $9,416.00 97.3% 72 290 LF $ 3.00 $870.00 73 290 LF $ 8.00 $2,320.00 255.00 $2,040.00 $2,040.00 87.9% 74 70 LF $ 90.00 $6,300.00 61.00 $5,490.00 $5,490.00 87.1% 75 220 LF $ 128.00 $28,160.00 194.00 $24,832.00 $24,832.00 88.2% 76 1 EA $ 2,000.00 $2,000.00 1.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 100.0% 77 1 EA $ 800.00 $800.00 1.00 $800.00 $800.00 100.0% 78 9 LF $ 1,450.00 $13,050.00 8.25 $11,962.50 $11,962.50 91.7% 79 1 EA $ 500.00 $500.00 1.00 $500.00 $500.00 100.0% 80 1 EA $ 550.00 $550.00 1.00 $550.00 $550.00 100.0% 81 300 SY $ 28.00 $8,400.00 63.54 $1,779.12 $1,779.12 21.2% 82 1 LS $ 12,235.00 $12,235.00 1.00 $12,235.00 $12,235.00 100.0% ADJUST EXISTING MANHOLE CASTING 8" PVC PLUG INSULATION STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION SEEDING BYPASS PUMPING CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER PIPE 4' DIA SANITARY MH, INCL. R-1642-B CSTG AND HDPE ADJ. RINGS SEED MIXTURE 25-151 REMOVE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER PIPE IMPROVED PIPE FOUNDATION TELEVISE SANITARY SEWER CLEARING AND GRUBBING CONIFEROUS TREE 12' HT B&B SALVAGED TOPSOIL BORROW (LV) EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (CATEGORY 0) 8" PVC SANITARY SEWER PIPE, SDR 35 12" PVC SANITARY SEWER PIPE, SDR 35 EJCDC® C-620 Contractor's Application for Payment © 2013 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved. Page 5 of 6 Progress Estimate - Unit Price Work Contractor's Application Estimated Quantity Installed Value of Work Installed to Date Materials Presently Stored (not in C) Total Completed and Stored to Date (D + E) Wells 9 & 11 Interim Water Treatment Facilities 7 - FINAL 08/01/2024-08/21/2025 8/21/2025 A B C D E F For (Contract): Application Number: Application Date:Application Period: % (F / B) Bid Item No. Description Contract Information Item Quantity Units Unit Price Total Value of Item ($) Item WATERMAIN WELL 11 83 150 LF $ 3.00 $450.00 84 150 LF $ 165.00 $24,750.00 138.50 $22,852.50 $22,852.50 92.3% 85 200 LBS $ 31.00 $6,200.00 297.00 $9,207.00 $9,207.00 148.5% 86 2 EA $ 8,250.00 $16,500.00 2.00 $16,500.00 $16,500.00 100.0% STREETS WELL 11 87 60 SY $ 10.00 $600.00 1,102.78 $11,027.80 $11,027.80 1838.0% 88 120 LF $ 5.00 $600.00 480.00 $2,400.00 $2,400.00 400.0% 89 100 LF $ 13.00 $1,300.00 128.00 $1,664.00 $1,664.00 128.0% 90 10 LF $ 5.00 $50.00 5.00 $25.00 $25.00 50.0% 91 820 CY $ 25.00 $20,500.00 820.00 $20,500.00 $20,500.00 100.0% 92 500 CY $ 40.00 $20,000.00 566.00 $22,640.00 $22,640.00 113.2% 93 650 TN $ 29.00 $18,850.00 197.86 $5,737.94 $5,737.94 30.4% 94 120 TN $ 163.00 $19,560.00 119.86 $19,537.18 $19,537.18 99.9% 95 160 TN $ 145.00 $23,200.00 159.55 $23,134.75 $23,134.75 99.7% 96 60 GL $ 6.00 $360.00 100.00 $600.00 $600.00 166.7% 97 100 LF $ 70.00 $7,000.00 138.50 $9,695.00 $9,695.00 138.5% 98 2 EA $ 400.00 $800.00 2.00 $800.00 $800.00 100.0% CHANGE ORDERS CO #1 1 LS $ 126,688.00 $126,688.00 1.00 $126,688.00 $126,688.00 100.0% CO #2 1 LS $ 28,326.81 $28,326.81 1.00 $28,326.81 $28,326.81 100.0% $2,819,414.81 $2,775,952.19 $2,775,952.19 98.5% WELL 9 VFD ADJUST EXISTING STORM SEWER MANHOLE CASTING SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS 12" DIP WATER MAIN, CL. 52, INCL. POLY WRAP IMPROVED PIPE FOUNDATION B618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT 2" TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,C) 1.5" TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,C) - SPECIAL REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SAWING CURB & GUTTER COMMON EXCAVATION (EV) 12" AGGREGATE BACKFILL 8" AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5, 100% CRUSHED LIMESTONE CONNECT TO EXISTING 12" WATER MAIN TOTAL UNIT PRICE WORK CARTRIDGE FILTER DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE TRANSMITTERS EJCDC® C-620 Contractor's Application for Payment © 2013 National Society of Professional Engineers for EJCDC. All rights reserved. Page 6 of 6 1 City Council Action Request 7.N. Meeting Date 9/17/2025 Department Engineering Agenda Category Action Item Title Lamar Avenue Drainage Easement - Quote Award Staff Recommendation Approve Resolution 2025-139 awarding the 2025 Erosion Repair & Storm Sewer Replacement Project to Dynamic Earth & Civil, LLC in the amount of $123,084.15, and the appropriate officials are hereby authorized to sign all necessary documents to effectuate these actions. Budget Implication $123,084.15 - Stormwater Utility Fund Attachments 1. 2025 Lamar Ave Quote Award Memo 2. Resolution 3. SIGNED AGREEMENT, DYNAMIC QUOTE, AND KEVITT QUOTE 4. Peterson Proposal Erosion and Storm jp 5. Quote Form - 2025 Erosion Repair & Storm Sewer Replacement Project - Signed To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From: Joe Fox, PE, Project Engineer Date: September 9, 2025 Re: 2025 Erosion Repair & Storm Sewer Replacement Project – Quote Award Background Each year the City completes maintenance on City-owned stormwater ponds to stay in compli- ance with the MS4 permit with the MPCA, which requires permit holders to maintain their storm sewer system. This project in Old Cottage Grove serves two purposes. First, it stabilizes an eroded channel that conveys stormwater from Lamar and Langly Avenues to Vandeberg Lake. This channel has significant erosion that starts near the back lot line of 7430 Lamar. A new swale lined with rock will be constructed to convey the stormwater down the slope to the lake. The second part of this project is the replacement of aging storm sewer in Lamar Avenue adjacent to Gerlach Services. The existing storm sewer is corrugated metal pipe that has rusted. It will be replaced with concrete storm pipe. Three manholes will also be replaced. This part of the project will entail a full closure of Lamar Avenue for a few days while the pipe under Lamar is removed and replaced and the street is rebuilt. A detour utilizing 75th Street, Langly Avenue, and Upper 74th Street will be installed. Project funding comes from the Stormwater Utility Fund. Discussion The City of Cottage Grove received four quotes for this project. The table below summarizes the results. The quotes received are attached. The low quote for the project was provided by Dynamic Earth & Civil, LLC in the amount of $123,084.15. The difference between the low and high quotes is almost $100,000. This large difference for a relatively small project could be due to the nature of stormwater maintenance projects where contractors have unique strategies for achieving the project goals. The higher quotes came from larger companies based in other areas of the metro. The low quote came from a smaller local firm. Contractor Quoted Amount Dynamic Earth & Civil, LLC $123,084.15 New Look Contracting, Inc. $199,952.50 Peterson Companies, Inc. $201,012.30 Kevitt Companies $198,505.38 Engineer’s Estimate $157,371.00 Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Jennifer Levitt Recommendation CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION AWARDING THE 2025 EROSION REPAIR AND STORM SEWER REPLACEMENT PROJECT TO IN THE AMOUNT OF $123,084.15 WHEREAS, quotes were requested to provide the necessary work for the 2025 Erosion Repair and Storm Sewer Replacement Project; and WHEREAS, four firms submitted quotes; and WHEREAS, it appears that Dynamic Earth & Civil, LLC provided the lowest accepted quote; and WHEREAS, it is the recommendation of the City Engineer that the quote be awarded to Dynamic Earth & Civil, LLC in the amount of $123,084.15. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, that the 2025 Erosion Repair and Storm Sewer Replacement Project quote be awarded to Dynamic Earth & Civil, LLC in the amount of $123,084.15 and the appropriate officials are hereby authorized to sign all necessary documents to effectuate these actions. Passed this 17th day of September, 2025 Myron Bailey, Mayor Attest: Tamara Anderson, City Clerk 2.PAYMENT. a.City agrees to pay Contractor $123,084.15 and Contractor agrees to receive and accept payment for Services as set forth in the Exhibits. b.Any changes in the scope of the work of the Services that may result in an increase to the compensation due the Contractor shall require prior written approval by the authorized representative of the City or by the City Council. The City will not pay additional compensation for Services that do not have prior written authorization. c.Contractor shall submit itemized bills for Services provided to City on a monthly basis. Bills submitted shall be paid in the same manner as other claims made to City. d.Prior to payment, the Contractor will submit evidence that all payrolls, material bills, subcontractors and other indebtedness connected with the Services have been paid as required by the City. 3.TERM. The term of this Agreement is identified in t he Exhibits. This Agreement may be extended upon the written mutual consent of the parties fo r such additional periods as they deem appropriate, and upon the same terms and conditions as herein stated. 4.BONDS. If the Services provided by the Contractor as set forth in the Exhibits and this Agreement exceeds $175,000, Contractor shall furnish performance and payment bonds covering faithful performance of all the Contractor's obligations, including, without limitation, warranty obligations and of all payment of obligations arising under this Agreement. The bonds shall each be issued in an amount equal to 100% of the stipulated sum identified in Section 2 of this Agreement. 5.TERMINATION AND REMEDIES. a.Termination by Either Party. This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon thirty (30) days' written notice delivered to the other party at the addresses listed in Section 15 of this Agreement. Upon termination under this provision, if . there is no default by the Contractor, Contractor shall be paid for Services rendered and reimbursable expenses incurred through the effective date of termination. b.Termination Due to Default. This Agreement may be terminated by either partyupon written notice in the event of substantial failure by the other party to perform in faccordance with the terms of this Agreement. The non�pe1o1ming party shall havefifteen (15) calendar days from the date of the termination notice to cme or to submit aplan for cme that is acceptable to the other party. 2 CONTRACTOR Slgnaru��00J Name:�-�- lts: \)w'{\ef: Date: DC\·\ Q • Z.tf2...S 9 CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE By: _____________ _ Myron A. Bailey, Mayor By: ___________ _ Tamara Anderson, City Clerk Date: ------ - - ----- 7 TOTAL QUOTE $113,0S'-t.lS $�QQ IT IS AGREED that the above work wlll be substantlally complete on or before November 26, 2025. Respectfully submitted, �N\M\ L Eo.rfu W\J ,\ U( (a corporation)a e (an lndlvldual) \Dto7S r»p.{doud::ts\Md b"SStr�t Add�ss �tyt)ul Port:. MN 5501 I City�State, Zip Co�e 1 _ lo�\ • 7109 • :154 \D (a partnership) 5 Item Number Contract Item Unit Estimated Quantity Unit Cost Amount Part 1: Erosion Repair 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 45,130.00 $ 45,130.00 2 Orange construction fence (4-ft tall) LF 75 $ 3.85 $ 288.75 3 Machine Sliced Silt Fence LF 140 $ 4.95 $ 693.00 4 Clearing & Grubbing AC 0.15 $ 49,350.00 $ 7,402.50 5 Swale Grading LF 130 $ 63.40 $ 8,242.00 6 Salvage and Respread Top Soil (6” Depth)SY 377 $ 11.80 $ 4,448.60 7 Common Embankment (LV) CY 530 $ 22.50 $ 11,925.00 8 Random Riprap Class 3 CY 128 $ 87.30 $ 11,174.40 9 Seeding Type MNDOT 36-211 LBS 5 $ 81.30 $ 406.50 10 Rolled Erosion Control Mat Cat 25 SY 377 $ 7.20 $ 2,714.40 Subtotal – Part 1 $ 92,425.15 2025 EROSION REPAIR & STORM SEWER REPLACEMENT PROJECT CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA The undersigned hereby agrees to perform all work in accordance with the contract, plans and approved specifications of the City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota. QUOTE FORM 3 Item Number Contract Item Unit Estimated Quantity Unit Cost Amount Part 2: Storm Sewer Replacement 11 Traffic Control LS 1 $ 12,830.00 $ 12,830.00 12 Remove and Replace 6-inch concrete driveway SY 10 $ 441.50 $ 4,415.00 13 Remove and Replace Bituminous Street SY 370 $ 57.10 $ 21,127.00 14 Salvage and Reinstall Signs 1 EA $ 386.00 $ 386.00 15 Aggregate Base, Virgin Class 5 5 TN $ 127.00 $ 635.00 16 Remove Catch Basin or Manhole 3 EA $ 1,359.00 $ 4,077.00 17 Remove Pipe – 15 to 24 Inch RCP 251 LF $ 32.50 $ 8,157.50 18 Connect Pipe to Existing Structure 1 EA $ 2,190.00 $ 2,190.00 19 15-inch RCP Storm Sewer 83 LF $ 70.20 $ 5,826.60 20 18-inch RCP Storm Sewer 68 LF $ 81.50 $ 5,542.00 21 24-inch RCP Storm Sewer 100 LF $ 113.00 $ 11,300.00 22 4-foot Diameter Storm Sewer Manhole, Incl R-2540 Casting and HDPE Adjustment Rings (ST7276) 5 LF $ 1,294.00 $ 6,470.00 23 4-foot Diameter Storm Sewer Manhole, Incl Casting and HDPE Adjustment Rings (STO-9) (ST7277 & ST4681) 6.5 LF $ 1,898.00 $ 12,337.00 24 24-inch RCP FES W/ Trash Guard 1 EA $ 3,601.00 $ 3,601.00 25 Random Riprap Class 3 20 CY $ 141.00 $ 2,820.00 26 Televise Storm Sewer Pipe 251 LF $ 8.40 $ 2,108.40 27 Adjust Manhole Casting, Incl New HDPE Rings (ST5568)1 EA $ 488.50 $ 488.50 28 Seeding Type MNDOT Residential Turfgrass 13 LB $ 8.55 $ 111.15 29 Hydraulic Matrix Type Mulch 250 SY $ 13.80 $ 3,450.00 30 Street Sweeper with Operator 1 HR $ 715.00 $ 715.00 Subtotal – Part 2 $ 108,587.15 Total Quote $ 201,012.30 4 201,012.30 1 City Council Action Request 7.O. Meeting Date 9/17/2025 Department Engineering Agenda Category Action Item Title County 19A/100th St Realignment - TED and TEDI Grant Application Staff Recommendation Adopt Resolution 2025-145 supporting the City’s TED and TEDI grant applications for the County 19A/100th Street Realignment Project. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. Memo - TED and TEDI Grant Applications 2. 2025 TED-TEDI_Cottage Grove Resolution_SW Arterial Ph1_v2 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From: Paul Sponholz, City Engineer Date: September 11, 2025 Re: County 19A/100th Street Realignment – TED and TEDI Grant Application Background In 2019, Washington County began a planning study related to a future arterial roadway to be developed in the southwestern area of the County, within the City of Cottage Grove. The primary driver of this study was to address the lack of arterial roadways in this area of the County. The County worked with several partners on this project including Cottage Grove, St. Paul Park, Grey Cloud Island Township, and the South Washington Watershed District. In April of 2021, the final study, the Southwest Arterial Study, was approved by the City Council. Since that time, this southern area of Cottage Grove has seen a rapid acceleration of both industrial and residential development. Due to this, the City and County are working to implement the first phase of the Southwest Arterial Study. This will involve the realignment of County 19A and 100th Street to provide a direct connection from Highway 61 into the Business Park. This project would also include the construction of a bridge over the CPKC Railroad, which is critical to allow for unhindered access for logistics and distribution businesses. Discussion Preliminary design work has been completed for this project. While the City and County have started final design with right-of-way acquisition expected to start in 2025, construction costs are not fully funded at this point. To date, the City and County have received $13.667 million in grant funding. The City and County are working to obtain additional funding through multiple sources including Federal and State grants and bonding. Along those lines, Cottage Grove is leading the effort to submit to the state TED and TEDI grants. These are very comprehensive and competitive grants, which are due September 29, 2025. As part of the application, a resolution from the City Council is required. Based on the preferred design alternative that has been selected, the total project cost shown in the grant is $46,900,000 million. The City will be requesting a grant amount of $2,000,000. Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution 2025-145 supporting the City’s TED and TEDI grant applications for the County 19A/100th Street Realignment Project. CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA th Street and County Road 19A, reconstruction of County Road 19A’s intersection with Trunk Highway 61, and construction of a railroad bridge over the Canadian Pacific’s rail line (hereinafter referred to as the “Southwest Arterial Project”); and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Cottage Grove has the legal authority to apply for financial assistance, and the institutional, managerial, and financial capability to ensure matching funds and adequate construction of the proposed project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Cottage Grove has not violated any Federal, State or local laws pertaining to fraud, bribery, graft, kickbacks, collusion, conflict of interest or other unlawful or corrupt practice. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon approval of its application by the state, the City of Cottage Grove may enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota for the above-referenced project(s), and that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in all contract agreements. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Cottage Grove, in conjunction with project partners, will meet local cost share requirements, secure any additional funding if project costs increase, and repay the grant if project milestones are not met. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED The City of Cottage Grove certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and rules of the Application. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the sources and uses, private investors, equity, and other financing commitments represented in the attached document are accurate. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove authorizes city staff to apply for and execute the necessary documents for the TED and TEDI grant applications requesting funds for the Southwest Arterial Phase 1 Project. Passed this 17th day of September, 2025. Myron Bailey, Mayor Attest: Tamara Anderson, City Clerk 1 City Council Action Request 7.P. Meeting Date 9/17/2025 Department Parks and Recreation Agenda Category Action Item Title MN DNR Outdoor Recreation Grant Agreement-Mississippi Dunes Park Staff Recommendation Authorize MN Department of Natural Resources Outdoor Recreation Grant Agreement for $350,000 to be used for the Mississippi Dunes Park development project. Budget Implication $350,000 Match - Park Improvement Fund Attachments 1. Council Memo - Grant Agreement 2. LW27-01483 CG agreement_DRAFT To: From: CC: Date: Subject: Introduction/Background Recommendation February 2024 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA GRANT AGREEMENT Federal Sub-Award Agreement LW27-01483 This grant agreement is between the State of Minnesota, acting through its Commissioner of Natural Resources ("State") and City of Cottage Grove, PUH4LGL9L1G9, 12800 Ravine Parkway S., Cottage Grove, MN, 55016 ("Grantee"). Recitals 1. Under the Land and Water Conservation Fund, National Park Service, 15.916-Outdoor Recreation Acquisition, Development and Planning and Federal Award P25AP00573, the State received a federal award of $350,000 on July 1, 2025 for 27-01483 Cottage Grove Mississippi Dunes Park Development. The purpose of the federal grant is to develop Mississippi Dunes Park. This project is not a research and development award. 2.Under 27-01483 Cottage Grove Mississippi Dunes Park Development and Minn. Stat. 84.026, the State subawards $350,000 to the Grantee PUH4LGL9L1G9 for the purpose of conducting the project entitled LW27-01483 Cottage Grove Mississippi Dunes Park Development for the purpose of constructing trails, playground, paddling launch, picnic facilities, outdoor classroom, parking lot, utilities, interpretive signage, and restoring native habitat. 3. The commissioner of natural resources is authorized to enter into contractual agreements with any public or private entity for the provision of statutorily prescribed natural resources services by the department. 4.Pursuant to Minn. Stat. 84.0264, the state is empowered to receive and administer grants under the Land and Water Conservation Fund grant program authorized by Congress in the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965, as amended, and the Local Grants program authorized by the State of Minnesota. Fifty percent of the funds granted under subdivision 1 shall be distributed for projects to be acquired, developed, and maintained by local units of government, providing that any project approved is consistent with a statewide or a county or regional recreational plan and compatible with the statewide recreational plan. All money received by the commissioner for local units of government is appropriated annually to carry out the purposes for which the funds are received. 5. The Grantee has made application to the State for a portion of the allocation for the purpose of conducting the project entitled Mississippi Dunes Park. 6.The Grantee represents that it is duly qualified and agrees to perform all services described in this grant agreement to the satisfaction of the State. Grant Agreement 1.Term of Grant Agreement 1.1. Effective date: July 1, 2025, Notwithstanding Minnesota Statues, section 16A.41, the Commissioner may make payments for otherwise eligible grant-program expenditures that are made on or after the effective date of the appropriation. This is the Performance and Budget Period start date. 1.2. Expiration date: June 30, 2027, or, in the event this Grant Contract Agreement is continued by way of amendment or new agreement, the date the amendment or new agreement is fully executed, whichever is later. In the event an amendment or new agreement is not fully executed within 60 calendar days of the stated expiration date, this grant agreement will expire on August 29, 2027. This is the Performance and Budget Period end date. 1.3. Survival of Terms: The following clauses survive the expiration or cancellation of this grant agreement: 9 Liability; 10 Audits; 11 Government Data Practices and Intellectual Property; 13 Endorsement; 14 Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue; 16 Data Disclosure; 17 American Disabilities Act; 19 Monitoring; 23 Land Retention and Deed Restriction; 24 Resource Management and Protection; and 40 Additional Program DRA F T February 2024 2 Requirements. 2. Grantee’s Duties The Grantee, who is not a state employee, will: The Grantee will comply with required grants management policies and procedures set forth through Minnesota Statutes Section 16B.97, subdivision 4 (a) (1) and comply with Attachment A, Project Budget, which is incorporated and made a part of this contract. The Grantee agrees to complete the program in accordance with the approved budget to the extent practicable and within the program period specified in the grant agreement. Any material change in the grant agreement shall require an amendment by the State (see Section 7.2). The Grantee shall be responsible for the administration, supervision, management, record keeping and program oversight required for the work performed under this agreement. The Grantee is responsible for maintaining a written conflict of interest policy. Throughout the term of this agreement, the Grantee shall monitor and report any actual, potential, or perceived conflicts of interest to the State's Authorized Representative. 3. Time The Grantee must comply with all the time requirements described in this grant agreement. 4. Consideration and Payment. Funds made available pursuant to this Agreement shall be used only for expenses incurred in performing and accomplishing the purposes and activities specified herein. Notwithstanding all other provisions of this Agreement, it is understood that any reduction or termination of funds allocated to the State may result in a like reduction to the Grantee 4.1. Consideration. Consideration for all services performed by Grantee pursuant to this grant agreement shall be paid by the State as follows: 4.1.1. Compensation. Compensation in an amount not to exceed $350,000. 4.1.2. Total Federal Funds. The total amount of federal funds obligated to the Grantee by the State is $350,000, including the current financial obligation. 4.1.3. Matching Requirements. Grantee certifies that the following matching requirement for the grant will be met by Grantee. The total project cost is $1,109,000. Grantee agrees to provide a match of at least $759,000. Grant funds cannot be used by the Grantee as match or for reimbursement for any other grant or program without prior written authorization from the State’s Authorized Representative. 4.1.4. Indirect Cost Rate. Federal indirect costs are not eligible for reimbursement in the State’s federal award or this sub-award agreement. 4.1.5. Travel Expenses. Travel expenses are not eligible for reimbursement in the State’s federal award or this sub-award agreement. 4.2. Payment. The State shall disburse funds to the Grantee pursuant to this agreement on a reimbursement basis and will promptly pay the Grantee after the Grantee presents an itemized invoice for the services actually performed and the State's Authorized Representative accepts the invoiced services. Invoices must be submitted timely and according to the following schedule: upon completion of services or up to four requests during the contract DRA F T February 2024 3 period. A final reimbursement of not more than 10% may be withheld until final completion of services. 4.2.1. Federal funds. Payments under this grant agreement will be made from federal funds obtained by the State through the National Park Service of the United States Department of Interior, Land and Water Conservation Fund, 15.916, Act of 1965 as amended thereto, and under Assistance Listing Number 15.916 and P25AP00573. The Grantee is responsible for compliance with all federal requirements imposed on these funds and accepts full financial responsibility for any requirements imposed by the Grantee’s failure to comply with federal requirements. 5. Conditions of Payment All services provided by the Grantee under this grant agreement must be performed to the State’s satisfaction, as determined at the sole discretion of the State’s Authorized Representative and in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations. The Grantee will not receive payment for work found by the State to be unsatisfactory or performed in violation of federal, state, or local law. 6. Authorized Representative The State's Authorized Representative is Sarah Wennerberg, Grants Specialist Coordinator, 500 Lafayette Rd., St. Paul, MN 55155, 651-259-5579, sarah.wennerberg@state.mn.us, or their successor, and has the responsibility to monitor the Grantee’s performance and the authority to accept the services provided under this grant agreement. If the services are satisfactory, the State's Authorized Representative or their designee will certify acceptance on each invoice submitted for payment. The Grantee Authorized Representative is Zac Dockter, Parks and Recreation Director, 12800 Ravine Parkway S., Cottage Grove, MN 55016, 650-458-2847, zdocter@cottagegrovemn.gov, or their successor. If the Grantee’s Authorized Representative changes at any time during this grant agreement, the Grantee must immediately notify the State. 7. Assignment, Amendments, Waiver, and Grant Agreement Complete 7.1. Assignment. The Grantee may neither assign nor transfer any rights or obligations under this grant agreement without the prior consent of the State and a fully executed Assignment Agreement, executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved this grant agreement, or their successors in office. 7.2. Amendments. Any amendment to this grant agreement must be in writing and will not be effective until it has been executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved the original grant agreement, or their successors in office. 7.3. Waiver. If the State fails to enforce any provision of this grant agreement, that failure does not waive the provision or its right to enforce it. 7.4. Grant Agreement Complete. This grant agreement contains all negotiations and agreements between the State and the Grantee. No other understanding regarding this grant agreement, whether written or oral, may be used to bind either party. 8. Subcontractors, Contracting, and Bidding Requirements The Grantee agrees that if it subcontracts any portion of this project to another entity, the agreement with the subcontractor will contain all provisions of the agreement with the State. The Grantee also agrees to comply with Title 2 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200.318 through 2 CFR 200.326. 8.1 Uniform Municipal Contracting Law Per Minn.Stat. § 471.345, Grantees that are municipalities as defined in Subd. 1 must follow the law. 8.1.1. For projects that include construction work of $25,000 or more, prevailing wage rules apply per Minn.Stat. § 177.41 through 177.44 consequently, the bid request must state the project is subject to prevailing wage. These rules require that the wages of laborers and workers should be DRA F T February 2024 4 comparable to wages paid for similar work in the community as a whole. 8.2 The Grantee must not contract with vendors who are suspended or debarred in MN. 8.3 The Grantee may not issue a subaward or contract to any Federal employee, department, or agency, without advance permission from the State’s Authorized Representative. 8.4 Domestic Sourcing Preferences. Per 2 CFR 200.322, Grantees should, to the greatest extent practicable, provide a preference for the purchase, acquisition, or use of goods, products, or materials produced in the United States in every contract, purchase order, or sub-award. 8.5 Prohibition on certain telecommunications and video surveillance service or equipment. Per Public Law 115- 232, section 889; 2 CFR 200.216, Grantees are prohibited from obligating or expending grant funds on telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as part of any system produced by Huawei Technologies Company or ZTE Corporation (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities). 9. Liability The Grantee must indemnify, save, and hold the State, its agents, and employees harmless from any claims or causes of action, including attorney’s fees incurred by the State, arising from the performance of this grant agreement by the Grantee or the Grantee agents or employees. This clause will not be construed to bar any legal remedies the Grantee may have for the State's failure to fulfill its obligations under this grant agreement. 10. Audits (State and Single) Under Minn. Stat. §16B.98, subd. 8 and 2 CFR 200.331, the Grantee’s books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of the Grantee or other party relevant to this grant contract agreement or transaction are subject to examination by the Commissioner of Administration, by the State and/or the State Auditor or Legislative Auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of six years from the end of this grant contract agreement, receipt and approval of all final reports, or the required period of time to satisfy all state and program retention requirements, whichever is later. All state and local governments, colleges and universities, and non-profit organizations that expend $750,000 or more of Federal awards in a fiscal year must have a single audit according to the new OMB Uniform Guidance: Cost Principles, Audit, and Administrative Awards Requirements for Federal Awards. This is $750,000 total Federal awards received from all sources. If an audit is completed, forward a copy of the report to both the State's Authorized Representative and the State Auditor. 11. Government Data Practices and Intellectual Property 11.1 Government Data Practices. The Grantee and State must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, as it applies to all data provided by the State under this grant contract, and as it applies to all data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the Grantee under this grant contract agreement. The civil remedies of Minn. Stat. §13.08 apply to the release of the data referred to in this clause by either the Grantee or the State. If the Grantee receives a request to release the data referred to in this Clause, the Grantee must immediately notify the State. The State will give the Grantee instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. The Grantee’s response to the request shall comply with applicable law. 11.2 Intellectual Property Rights (if applicable). 11.2.1. Intellectual Property Rights. (A) Intellectual Property Rights. The State owns all rights, title, and interest in all of the intellectual property rights, including copyrights, patents, trade secrets, trademarks, and service marks in the Works and Documents created and paid for under this contract. Works means all inventions, improvements, discoveries (whether or not patentable), databases, computer programs, reports, notes, studies, photographs, negatives, designs, drawings, specifications, materials, tapes, and disks conceived, reduced to practice, created, or originated by the Grantee, its employees, agents, and DRA F T February 2024 5 subcontractors, either individually or jointly with others in the performance of this contract. Works includes “Documents.” Documents are the originals of any databases, computer programs, reports, notes, studies, photographs, negatives, designs, drawings, specifications, materials, tapes, disks, or other materials, whether in tangible or electronic forms, prepared by the Grantee, its employees, agents, or subcontractors, in the performance of this contract. The Documents will be the exclusive property of the State and all such Documents must be immediately returned to the State by the Grantee upon completion or cancellation of this contract. To the extent possible, those Works eligible for copyright protection under the United States Copyright Act will be deemed to be “works made for hire.” The Grantee assigns all right, title, and interest it may have in the Works and the Documents to the State. The Grantee must, at the request of the State, execute all papers and perform all other acts necessary to transfer or record the State’s ownership interest in the Works and Documents. (B) Obligations 1. Notification. Whenever any invention, improvement, or discovery (whether or not patentable) is made or conceived for the first time or actually or constructively reduced to practice by the Grantee, including its employees and subcontractors, in the performance of this contract, the Grantee will immediately give the State’s Authorized Representative written notice thereof, and must promptly furnish the Authorized Representative with complete information and/or disclosure thereon. 2. Representation. The Grantee must perform all acts and take all steps necessary to ensure that all intellectual property rights in the Works and Documents are the sole property of the State, and that neither Grantee nor its employees, agents, or subcontractors retain any interest in and to the Works and Documents. The Grantee represents and warrants that the Works and Documents do not and will not infringe upon any intellectual property rights of other persons or entities. Notwithstanding Clause 8, the Grantee will indemnify; defend, to the extent permitted by the Attorney General; and hold harmless the State, at the Grantee’s expense, from any action or claim brought against the State to the extent that it is based on a claim that all or part of the Works or Documents infringe upon the intellectual property rights of others. The Grantee will be responsible for payment of any and all such claims, demands, obligations, liabilities, costs, and damages, including but not limited to, attorney fees. If such a claim or action arises, or in the Grantee’s or the State’s opinion is likely to arise, the Grantee must, at the State’s discretion, either procure for the State the right or license to use the intellectual property rights at issue or replace or modify the allegedly infringing Works or Documents as necessary and appropriate to obviate the infringement claim. This remedy of the State will be in addition to and not exclusive of other remedies provided by law. (C) The federal awarding agency may receive royalty-free, non-exclusive and an irrevocable right to reproduce, publish, or otherwise use the work for Federal purposes, and to authorize others to do so as noted in 2 CFR 200.315. 12. Workers’ Compensation The Grantee certifies that it is in compliance with Minn. Stat. § 176.181, subd. 2, pertaining to workers’ compensation insurance coverage. The Grantee’s employees and agents will not be considered State employees. Any claims that may arise under the Minnesota Workers’ Compensation Act on behalf of these employees and any claims made by any third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of these employees are in no way the State’s obligation or responsibility. 13. Publicity and Endorsement 13.1 Publicity Any publicity regarding the subject matter of this grant contract agreement must identify the sponsoring agencies; and must not be released without prior written approval from the State’s Authorized Representative or their designee. For purposes of this provision, publicity includes websites, notices, informational pamphlets, press releases, research, reports, signs, and similar public notices prepared by or for the Grantee individually or jointly with others, or any subcontractors, with respect to the program, publications, or services provided resulting from this grant contract. All projects primarily funded by state grant appropriations must publicly DRA F T February 2024 6 credit the State of Minnesota, including on the grantee’s website when practicable. 13.2 Signage Any site funded by this grant contract shall display a sign at a prominent location at the entrance to the site and in a form approved by the State that acknowledges funding through this grant. 13.3 Endorsement The Grantee must not claim that the State endorses its products or services and the Grantee must adhere to the terms of 2 CFR 200.315. 14. Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue Minnesota law, without regard to its choice-of-law provisions, governs this grant agreement. Venue for all legal proceedings out of this grant agreement, or its breach, must be in the appropriate state or federal court with competent jurisdiction in Ramsey County, Minnesota. 15. Termination 15.1 (a) Termination by the State The State may immediately terminate this grant contract agreement with or without cause, upon 30 days’ written notice to the Grantee. Upon termination, the Grantee will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed. (b) Termination by The Commissioner of Administration The Commissioner of Administration may unilaterally cancel this grant contract agreement if further performance under the agreement would not serve agency purposes or is not in the best interest of the State. 15.2 Termination for Cause. The State may immediately terminate this grant contract agreement if the State finds that there has been a failure to comply with the provisions of this grant contract, that reasonable progress has not been made or that the purposes for which the funds were granted have not been or will not be fulfilled. The State may take action to protect the interests of the State of Minnesota, including the refusal to disburse additional funds and requiring the return of all or part of the funds already disbursed. 15.3 Termination for Insufficient Funding The State may immediately terminate this grant contract agreement if: (a) Funding for Grant No. P25AP00573 is withdrawn; or (b) Funding cannot be continued at a level sufficient to allow for the payment of the services covered here. Termination must be by written or fax notice to the Grantee. The State is not obligated to pay for any services that are provided after notice and effective date of termination. However, the Grantee will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed to the extent that funds are available. The State will not be assessed any penalty if the grant contract agreement is terminated because of the decision of the Minnesota Legislature, or other funding source, not to appropriate funds. The State must provide the Grantee notice of the lack of funding within a reasonable time of the State’s receiving that notice. 16 Data Disclosure Under Minn. Stat. § 270C.65, Subd. 3, and other applicable law, the Grantee consents to disclosure of its social security number, federal employer tax identification number, and/or Minnesota tax identification number, already provided to the State, to federal and state tax agencies and state personnel involved in the payment of state obligations. These identification numbers may be used in the enforcement of federal and state tax laws which could result in action requiring the Grantee to file state tax returns and pay delinquent state tax liabilities, if any. 17 American Disabilities Act The Grantee is subject to complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.) and all applicable regulations and guidelines. Grantee must comply with the 2010 American Disabilities Act Standards for Accessible Design, or any updated version of these requirements in effect DRA F T February 2024 7 at the time of this grant, and all applicable regulations and guidelines. The Grantee shall construct, operate, and maintain all facilities and programs in compliance with all state and federal accessibility laws, regulations, and guidelines including the Final Guidelines for Outdoor Developed Areas. Information on compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act is available at U.S. Access Board. 18 Non-Discrimination Requirements No person in the United States must, on the ground of race, color, national origin, handicap, age, religion, or sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subject to discrimination under, any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. Including but not limited to: a) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq.) and DOC implementing regulations published at 15 C.F.R. Part 8 prohibiting discrimination on the grounds of race, color, or national origin under programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance; Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (20 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq.) prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sex under Federally assisted education programs or activities; b) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. § 794), and DOC implementing regulations published at 15 C.F.R. Part 8b prohibiting discrimination on the basis of handicap under any program or activity receiving or benefiting from Federal assistance. c) The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (42 U.S.C. § 6101 et seq.), and DOC implementing regulations published at 15 C.F.R. Part 20 prohibiting discrimination on the basis of age in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance; d) Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 which prohibits discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities in services, programs, and activities of public entities. e) Rules and relevant orders of the Minnesota Department of Human Rights issues pursuant to the Minnesota Human Rights Act f) Minn. Stat. 363A.02 prohibiting discrimination against any employee or applicant because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status in regard to public assistance, membership or activity in a local commission, disability, sexual orientation, or age and requiring affirmative steps to be taken to employ, advance in employment, upgrade, train, and recruit minority persons, women, and persons with disabilities. g) Any other applicable non-discrimination law(s). 19 Reporting Requirements The Grantee shall submit a progress report, in a form prescribed by the State, by January 1 of each year during the term of this grant contract. A final report must be submitted with the request for final reimbursement. Forms will be provided by the State. 20 Monitoring The State shall be allowed at any time to conduct periodic site visits and inspections to ensure work progress in accordance with this grant agreement, including a final inspection upon program completion. At least one monitoring visit per grant period on all state grants of over $50,000 will be conducted and at least annual monitoring visits on grants of over $250,000. Following closure of the program, the State’s authorized representatives shall be allowed to conduct post-completion inspections of the site to ensure that the site is being properly operated and maintained and that no conversion of use has occurred. 21 Conflict of Interest It is the policy of the State to work to deliberately avoid actual and potential conflict of interests related to grant making at both the individual and organizational levels. A conflict of interest (actual or potential) occurs when a person has actual or apparent duty or loyalty to more than one organization and the competing duties or loyalties may result in actions which are adverse to one or both parties. A conflict of interest exists even if no unethical, improper, or illegal act results from it. The Grantee, by signing this contract with the State, certifies it has read and understands the Office of Grants Management Conflict of Interest Policy 08-01, will maintain an adequate Conflict of Interest Policy and, throughout the term of the contract, monitor and report any actual or potential conflicts of interest to the State’s DRA F T February 2024 8 Authorized Representative. 22 Minnesota Historical Sites Act and Minnesota Field Archaeology Act For projects involving land acquisition and/or construction, the State Historic Preservation Office must review the project to determine if the site is a potential location for historical or archeological findings. If the State Historic Preservation Office determines that a survey is required, the survey would need to be completed prior to any site disturbance for development projects and prior to the final reimbursement of the grant funds for acquisition projects. 23 Land Retention and Deed Restriction 23.1 Land Retention Any lands acquired or developed with assistance from the Outdoor Recreation grant program must be retained solely for public outdoor recreation use. The lands subject to this contract are shown in Attachment B – Boundary Map which is attached and incorporated into this contract. No other use can be made of these lands without prior written approval of the State and the Secretary of Interior. The State will consider requests to convert these lands to other uses only if all practical alternatives have been evaluated and rejected on a sound basis and replacement lands of equal or greater fair market value and reasonably equivalent usefulness are acquired and dedicated to public outdoor recreation use. 23.2 Deed Restriction The Grantee shall have the following condition recorded with the deed to all lands within the park as described in Attachment B – Boundary Map and submit an attested copy of the deed and the condition to the State: In order to comply with the Department of Natural Resources Outdoor Recreation Project Contract LW27-01483, the City of Cottage Grove does hereby impose the following restrictions on the property described in Attachment B to that contract: 1. The property shall be permanently managed and maintained for public outdoor recreation use. 2. The property has been acquired and/or developed with Land and Water Conservation Fund assistance and that it cannot be converted to other than public outdoor recreation use without the written approval of the State acting through its Commissioner of Natural Resources and the Secretary of the Interior. 24 Resource Management and Protection The Grantee shall protect, manage and maintain, or cause to maintain, the property acquired and/or developed pursuant to this grant contract. Properties shall be kept reasonably safe for public use, if applicable. All state and federal accessibility laws, regulations and standards shall be adhered to. Vegetation management and similar safeguards and supervision shall be provided to the extent feasible. Buildings, roads, trails and other structures and improvements, if any, shall be kept in reasonable repair throughout their estimated lifetime to prevent undue deterioration. The Grantee shall keep the facility open to the general public at reasonable hours and at times of the year consistent with the purpose and type of use of the property and appropriate management and protection of natural resources. 25 Invasive Species Prevention The DNR requires active steps to prevent or limit the introduction, establishment, and spread of invasive species during contracted work. The contractor shall prevent invasive species from entering into or spreading within a project site by cleaning equipment prior to arriving at the project site. If the equipment, vehicles, gear, or clothing arrives at the project site with soil, aggregate material, mulch, vegetation (including seeds) or animals, it shall be cleaned by contractor furnished tool or equipment (brush/broom, compressed air or pressure washer) at the staging area. The contractor shall dispose of material cleaned from equipment and clothing at a location determined by the DNR Contract Administrator. If the material cannot be disposed of onsite, secure material prior to transport (sealed container, covered truck, or wrap with tarp) and legally dispose of offsite. The contractor shall ensure that all equipment and clothing used for work in infested waters has been adequately decontaminated for invasive species (ex. zebra mussels) prior to being used in non-infested waters. All equipment and DRA F T February 2024 9 clothing including but not limited to waders, tracked vehicles, barges, boats, turbidity curtain, sheet pile, and pumps that comes in contact with any infested waters must be thoroughly decontaminated. 26 Pollinator Best Management Practices Habitat restorations and enhancements conducted on DNR lands and prairie restorations on state lands or on any lands using state funds are subject to pollinator best management practices and habitat restoration guidelines pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 84.973. Practices and guidelines ensure an appropriate diversity of native species to provide habitat for pollinators through the growing season. Current specific practices and guidelines to be followed for contract and grant work can be found here: Link to December 2014 version. 27 Force Majeure Neither party shall be responsible to the other or considered in default of its obligations within this Contract to the extent that performance of any such obligation is prevented or delayed by acts of God, war, riot, disruption of government, or other catastrophes beyond the reasonable control of the party unless the act or occurrence could have been reasonably foreseen and reasonable action could have been taken to prevent the delay or failure to perform. A party relying on this provision to excuse performance must provide the other party prompt written notice of the inability to perform and take all necessary steps to bring about performance as soon as practicable. 28 Program Requirements The grantee will comply with the provisions of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (78 Stat. 897), and Attachment C, Federal Land and Water Conservation Fund Program General and Special Provisions, attached and incorporated into this contract. 29 Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion - Lower Tier Covered Transactions a.The prospective lower tier participant certifies, by submission of this agreement, that neither it nor its principals is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction by any Federal department or agency. b. Where the prospective lower tier participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this agreement. 30 Department of Interior Standard (DOI) Terms and Conditions. DOI Standard Terms and Conditions apply and are located at https://www.doi.gov/grants/doi-standard-terms-and- conditions (version effective April 1, 2025), except the provision related to the Davis-Bacon Act in Section VII. 31 2 C.F.R. 200.92 Subaward; 200.101 Applicability; and 200.331 Subrecipients and contractor determinations. Requirements for passthrough entities applies. 32 Lobbying Prohibition. 18 U.S.C. § 1913, Lobbying with Appropriated Moneys, as amended by Public Law 107–273, Nov. 2, 2002 Violations of this section shall constitute violations of section 1352(a) of title 31. In addition, the related restrictions on the use of appropriated funds found in Div. F, § 402 of the Omnibus Appropriations Act of 2008 (P.L. 110–161) also apply. 33 Byrd Anti-Lobbying Amendment Certification and Disclosure: a. The Grantee certifies that it will not and has not used Federal appropriated funds to pay any person or organization for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a member of Congress, officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with obtaining any Federal contract, grant or any other award covered by 31 U.S.C. 1352 b.The Grantee shall comply with Interim Final Rule, New Restrictions on Lobbying, found in Federal Register Vol. 55, No. 38, February 26, 1990, and any permanent rules that are adopted in place of the Interim Final Rule. The Interim Final Rule requires the Grantee to certify as to their lobbying activity. Further definition of lobbying can be found in 2 CFR 200.450. c. If the Grantee engages in lobbying activities with non-Federal funds that takes place in connection with obtaining any Federal award, they will promptly inform the authorized representative, and complete any certifications the authorized representative requires. DRA F T February 2024 10 34 Whistleblower Protection Rights 41 USC §4712, Enhancement of Recipient and Subrecipient Employee Whistleblower Protection (a) This award and employees working on this financial assistance agreement will be subject to the whistleblower rights and remedies in the pilot program on Award Recipient employee whistleblower protections established at 41 U.S.C. 4712 by section 828 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Pub.L. 112-239) (b) Recipients, their subrecipients, and their contractors awarded contracts over the simplified acquisition threshold related to this award, shall inform their employees in writing, in the predominant language of the workforce, of the employee whistleblower rights and protections under 41 USC 4712. (c) The recipient shall insert this clause, including this paragraph (c), in all subawards and in contracts over the simplified acquisition threshold related to this award. 35 ENSURING THE FUTURE IS MADE IN ALL OF AMERICA BY ALL OF AMERICA’S WORKERS PER E.O. 14005. Per Executive Order 14005, entitled "Ensuring the Future Is Made in All of America by All of America's Workers” the Recipient shall maximize the use of goods, products, and materials produced in, and services offered in, the United States, and whenever possible, procure goods, products, materials, and services from sources that will help American businesses compete in strategic industries and help America’s workers thrive. 36 Clean Air Act and Federal Water Pollution Act The Contractor must comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251-1387). Violations must be reported to the Federal awarding agency and the Regional Office of the EPA. 37 Procurement of Recovered Materials A non-Federal entity that is a state agency or agency of a political subdivision of a state and its contractors must comply with section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. The requirements of Section 6002 include procuring only items designated in guidelines of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) at 40 CFR part 247 that contain the highest percentage of recovered materials practicable, consistent with maintaining a satisfactory level of competition, where the purchase price of the item exceeds $10,000 or the value of the quantity acquired during the preceding fiscal year exceeded $10,000; procuring solid waste management services in a manner that maximizes energy and resource recovery; and establishing an affirmative procurement program for procurement of recovered materials identified in the EPA guidelines. [78 FR 78608, Dec. 26, 2013, as amended at 79 FR 75885, Dec. 19, 2014]. 38 Build America Buy America The following terms apply for financial assistance agreements for infrastructure that currently or are anticipated to exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT), currently $250,000. This threshold applies for the duration of the award and obligations made for infrastructure projects when additional funds are obligated through modification or renewal. For more information on DOI’s approved waiver, see: https://www.doi.gov/grants/BuyAmerica/GeneralApplicabilityWaivers. As required by Section 70914 of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (also known as the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act), P.L. 117-58, on or after May 14, 2022, none of the funds under a federal award that are part of Federal financial assistance program for infrastructure may be obligated for a project unless all of the iron, steel, manufactured products, and construction materials used in the project are produced in the United States, unless subject to an approved waiver. The requirements of this section must be included in all subawards, including all contracts and purchase orders for work or products under this program. Recipients of an award of Federal financial assistance are hereby notified that none of the funds provided under this award may be used for a project for infrastructure unless: 1. all iron and steel used in the project are produced in the United States--this means all manufacturing processes, from the initial melting stage through the application of coatings, occurred in the United States; 2. all manufactured products used in the project are produced in the United States —this means the manufactured product was manufactured in the United States; and the cost of the components of the DRA F T February 2024 11 manufactured product that are mined, produced, or manufactured in the United States is greater than 55 percent of the total cost of all components of the manufactured product, unless another standard for determining the minimum amount of domestic content of the manufactured product has been established under applicable law or regulation; and 3. all construction materials are manufactured in the United States—this means that all manufacturing processes for the construction material occurred in the United States. The Buy America preference only applies to articles, materials, and supplies that are consumed in, incorporated into, or affixed to an infrastructure project. As such, it does not apply to tools, equipment, and supplies, such as temporary scaffolding, brought to the construction site and removed at or before the completion of the infrastructure project. Nor does a Buy America preference apply to equipment and furnishings, such as movable chairs, desks, and portable computer equipment, that are used at or within the finished infrastructure project but are not an integral part of the structure or permanently affixed to the infrastructure project. For further information on the Buy America preference, please visit https://www.doi.gov/grants/BuyAmerica. Additional information can also be found at the White House Made in America Office website: https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/management/made-in-america Waivers When necessary, recipients may apply for, and the Department of the Interior (DOI) may grant, a waiver from these requirements, subject to review by the Made in America Office. The DOI may waive the application of the domestic content procurement preference in any case in which it is determined that one of the below circumstances applies: 1. Non-availability Waiver: the types of iron, steel, manufactured products, or construction materials are not produced in the United States in sufficient and reasonably available quantities or of a satisfactory quality; 2. Unreasonable Cost Waiver: the inclusion of iron, steel, manufactured products, or construction materials produced in the United States will increase the cost of the overall project by more than 25 percent; or 3. Public Interest Waiver: applying the domestic content procurement preference would be inconsistent with the public interest. There may be instances where an award qualifies, in whole or in part, for an existing DOI general applicability waiver as described at: https://www.doi.gov/grants/BuyAmerica/ GeneralApplicabilityWaivers. If the specific financial assistance agreement, infrastructure project, or non-domestic materials meets the criteria of an existing general applicability waiver within the limitations defined within the waiver, the recipient is not required to request a separate waiver for non-domestic materials. If a general applicability waiver does not already apply, and a recipient believes that one of the above circumstances applies to an award, a request to waive the application of the domestic content procurement preference may be submitted to the financial assistance awarding officer in writing. Waiver requests shall include the below information. The waiver shall not include any Privacy Act information, sensitive data, or proprietary information within their waiver request. Waiver requests will be posted to https://www.doi.gov/grants/buyamerica and are subject to public comment periods of no less than 15 days. Waiver requests will also be reviewed by the Made in America Office. 3. Type of waiver requested (non-availability, unreasonable cost, or public interest) 4. Requesting entity and Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) submitting the request. 5. Department of Interior Bureau or Office who issued the award. 6. Federal financial assistance listing name and number (reference block 2 on DOI Notice of Award) DRA F T February 2024 12 7. Financial assistance title of project (reference block 8 on DOI Notice of Award). 8. Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN). 9. Federal funding amount (reference block 11.m. on DO Notice of Award). 10. Total cost of Infrastructure expenditures (includes federal and non-federal funds to the extent known). 11. Infrastructure project description(s) and location(s) (to the extent known). 12. List of iron or steel item(s), manufactured goods, and construction material(s) the recipient seeks to waive from Buy America requirements. Include the name, cost, countries of origin (if known), and relevant PSC or NAICS code for each. 13. A certification that the recipient made a good faith effort to solicit bids for domestic products supported by terms included in requests for proposals, contracts, and nonproprietary communications with the prime contractor. 14. A statement of waiver justification, including a description of efforts made (e.g., market research, industry outreach) by the recipient, in an attempt to avoid the need for a waiver. Such a justification may cite, if applicable, the absence of any Buy America-compliant bids received in response to a solicitation. 13. Anticipated impact if no waiver is issued. Approved waivers will be posted at https://www.doi.gov/grants/BuyAmerica/ApprovedWaivers; recipients requesting a waiver will be notified of their waiver request determination by an awarding officer. Questions pertaining to waivers should be directed to the financial assistance awarding officer. Definitions “Construction materials” includes an article, material, or supply that is or consists primarily of: • non-ferrous metals; • plastic and polymer-based products (including polyvinylchloride, composite building materials, and polymers used in fiber optic cables); • glass (including optic glass); • lumber; or • drywall. “Construction Materials” does not include cement and cementitious materials, aggregates such as stone, sand, or gravel, or aggregate binding agents or additives. “Domestic content procurement preference’’ means all iron and steel used in the project are produced in the United States; the manufactured products used in the project are produced in the United States; or the construction materials used in the project are produced in the United States. “Infrastructure” includes, at a minimum, the structures, facilities, and equipment for, in the United States, roads, highways, and bridges; public transportation; dams, ports, harbors, and other maritime facilities; intercity passenger and freight railroads; freight and intermodal facilities; airports; water systems, including drinking water and wastewater systems; electrical transmission facilities and systems; utilities; broadband infrastructure; and buildings and real property. Infrastructure includes facilities that generate, transport, and distribute energy. ‘‘Project’’ means the construction, alteration, maintenance, or repair of infrastructure in the United States 39 Domestic Preference for Procurements As appropriate and to the extent consistent with law, the non-Federal entity should, to the greatest extent practicable DRA F T February 2024 13 under a federal award, provide a preference for the purchase, acquisition, or use of goods, products, or materials produced in the United States (including but not limited to iron, aluminum, steel, cement, and other manufactured products). The requirements of this section must be included in all subawards including all contracts and purchase orders for work or products under this award. 40 Additional Program Requirements a. Minority Business Enterprise Development Pursuant to Executive Order 12432 it is national policy to award a fair share of contracts to small and minority firms. NPS is strongly committed to the objectives of this policy and encourages all recipients of its Cooperative Agreements to take affirmative steps to ensure such fairness by ensuring procurement procedures are carried out in accordance with the Executive Order. b. Program Income If the Grantee earns program income, as defined in 2 CFR § 200.1, during the period of performance of this agreement, to the extent available the Grantee must disburse funds available from program income, and interest earned on such funds, before requesting additional cash payments (2 CFR § 200.305 (5)). As allowed under 2 CFR § 200.307, program income may be added to the Federal award by the Federal agency and the non-Federal entity. The program income must be used for the purposes, and under the conditions of, the Federal award. Disposition of program income remaining after the end of the period of performance shall be negotiated as part of the agreement closeout process. c. Rights in Data The Grantee must grant the United States of America a royalty–free, non–exclusive and irrevocable license to publish, reproduce and use, and dispose of in any manner and for any purpose without limitation, and to authorize or ratify publication, reproduction or use by others, of all copyrightable material first produced or composed under this Agreement by the Recipient, its employees or any individual or concern specifically employed or assigned to originate and prepare such material. d. Conflict of Interest Applicability i. This section intends to ensure that non-Federal entities and their employees take appropriate steps to avoid conflicts of interest in their responsibilities under or with respect to Federal financial assistance agreements. ii. In the procurement of supplies, equipment, construction, and services by recipients and by subrecipients, the conflict of interest provisions in 2 CFR §200.318 apply. Requirements a) Non-Federal entities must avoid prohibited conflicts of interest, including any significant financial interests that could cause a reasonable person to question the recipient's ability to provide impartial, technically sound, and objective performance under or with respect to a Federal financial assistance agreement. b) In addition to any other prohibitions that may apply with respect to conflicts of interest, no key official of an actual or proposed recipient or subrecipient, who is substantially involved in the proposal or project, may have been a former Federal employee who, within the last one (1) year, participated personally and substantially in the evaluation, award, or administration of an award with respect to that recipient or subrecipient or in development of the requirement leading to the funding announcement. c) No actual or prospective recipient or subrecipient may solicit, obtain, or use non-public information regarding the evaluation, award, or administration of an award to that recipient or subrecipient or the development of a Federal financial assistance opportunity that may be of competitive interest to that recipient or subrecipient. d) Notification. Non-Federal entities, including applicants for financial assistance awards, must disclose in writing any conflict of interest to the DOI awarding agency or pass- through DRA F T February 2024 14 entity in accordance with 2 CFR § 200.112, Conflicts of interest. e) Grantees must establish internal controls that include, at a minimum, procedures to identify, disclose, and mitigate or eliminate identified conflicts of interest. The recipient is responsible for notifying the Financial Assistance Officer in writing of any conflicts of interest that may arise during the life of the award, including those that have been reported by subrecipients. Restrictions on Lobbying. Non-Federal entities are strictly prohibited from using funds under this grant or cooperative agreement for lobbying activities and must provide the required certifications and disclosures pursuant to 43 CFR Part 18 and 31 USC § 1352. f) Review Procedures. The Financial Assistance Officer will examine each conflict-of-interest disclosure on the basis of its particular facts and the nature of the proposed grant or cooperative agreement and will determine whether a significant potential conflict exists and, if it does, develop an appropriate means for resolving it. g) Enforcement. Failure to resolve conflicts of interest in a manner that satisfies the Government may be cause for termination of the award. Failure to make required disclosures may result in any of the remedies described in 2 CFR § 200.338, Remedies for Noncompliance, including suspension or debarment (see also 2 CFR Part 180). Attachments: A. Project Budget B. Recreational Site Plan C. LWCF General Provisions DRA F T February 2024 15 1. STATE ENCUMBRANCE VERIFICATION 3. STATE AGENCY Individual certifies that funds have been encumbered as required by Minn. Statutes 16A.15. By: _______________________________________________ (with delegated authority) Signed: _____________________________________________ Title: ______________________________________________ Date: _______________________________________________ Date: ______________________________________________ SWIFT PO No. _______________ 2. GRANTEE The Grantee certifies that the appropriate person(s) have executed the grant agreement on behalf of the Grantee as required by applicable articles, bylaws, resolutions, or ordinances. By: ________________________________________________ By: ________________________________________________ Title: ______________________________________________ Title: ______________________________________________ Date: _______________________________________________ Date: _______________________________________________ DRA F T Attachment A - Project Budget Project Component Cottage GroveRecipientCity of Mississippi Dunes ParkLW27-01483Grant: Project Scope Mississippi Dunes Park recreational space development to connect people, nature, history by constructing trails, playground, paddling launch, picnic facilities, outdoor classroom, parking lot, utilities, interpretive signage and restoring native habitat. Grant Amount Parking Lot (40 stalls) $350,000 Playground (6,000 SF), accessible surface, curb, sidewalk, benches, tables Canoe/Kayak launch (ADA) Connecting walkways and interpretive signage $200,000 $500,000 $70,000 $45,000 Total Cos Cost $1,109,000 Notes / Condition $16,000 Local Match Total Cost $759,000 $1,109,000 Riverfront Habitat Restoration Amenities (Outdoor classroom, overlook/picnic pads, benches, picnic tables, waste/recycling receptacles) $178,000 Utilities $100,000 Sep 11, 2024 DRA F T ATTACHMENT B -- Boundary Map DRA F T DRA F T C DRA F T DRA F T DRA F T DRA F T DRA F T 1 City Council Action Request 7.Q. Meeting Date 9/17/2025 Department Parks and Recreation Agenda Category Action Item Title River Oaks Solar Power Grant Application and Service Agreement Staff Recommendation 1) Authorize staff to apply for the State of Minnesota’s Commerce Department of Energy and Utilities Solar on Public Buildings grant program to fund 70% of the River Oaks solar array project. 2) Upon award of the Solar on Public Buildings grant program, authorize a service agreement with Solar Connection for the installation of the River Oaks Solar Array for a total project cost of $143,672. Budget Implication Funding through State and Federal Grants. Attachments 1. Council Memo - River Oaks Solar Service Agreement 2. Agreement for Contractor Services_Solar Connection Inc. wExhibits (Cottage Grove_River Oaks) 9.9.25 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator From: CC: Zac Dockter, Parks and Recreation Director Brenda Malinowski, Finance Director Dennis Neitz, River Oaks General Manager Date: September 11, 2025 Subject: River Oaks Solar Power Grant Application and Service Agreement Introduction The Federal Government’s Inflation Reduction Act has created greater opportunity for energy conservation efforts by reimbursing 30% of solar projects. This opportunity expires for new projects after July 1, 2026. Further, the State of Minnesota’s Commerce Department of Energy and Utilities has issued a new statewide round of Solar on Public Buildings grant programming. $14.5 million is available to cover 70% of project costs for up to 40KW solar systems on publicly owned and operated buildings. Applications are being accepted continuously until November 14, 2025 or until the funds are fully distributed. Staff have met with representatives from the Clean Energy Resource Team (State Consultants) and it appears a solar system at River Oaks is well-qualified for this funding. Considering the opportunity for this project to be 100% funded with outside dollars, solar proposals have been prepared for Council review. Background Two proposals were received from local solar providers; Cedar Creek Energy (Blaine) and Solar Connection (Rochester). Both are reputable companies with a good history of working with residential, commercial and government entities. Both are on the MN Cooperative Purchasing Venture (CPV) which further verifies their ability to complete a successful project with local governmental units. Solar Connection installed the system at the Cottage Grove Ice Arena this past year and performed favorably. Below is the summarized financial analysis from each provider’s proposal. Cedar Creek Solar Connection System Size (Generated Megawatts/year) 53.13 68.09 Solar System Cost $160,000 $143,672 30% Inflation Reduction Act Credit ($48,000) ($43,102) 70% State Solar Grant ($112,000) ($100,570) Total Project Cost $0 $0 Total Projected 30 Year Energy Savings $269,081 $315,296 Staff Recommendation 1 AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES RIVER OAKS SOLAR PROJECT THIS AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and executed this 17th day of September, 2025, by and between the City of Cottage Grove, 12800 Ravine Parkway South, Cottage Grove, Minnesota 55016, (“City”) and Solar Connection Inc., 6254 34th Avenue NW, Suite A, Rochester, Minnesota 55901 (“Contractor”). WHEREAS, the City has accepted the proposal of the Contractor for certain services; and WHEREAS, Contractor desires to perform the services for the City under the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual consideration contained herein, it is hereby agreed as follows: 1.SERVICES. a.City agrees to engage Contractor as an independent contractor for the purpose of performing certain Services (“Services”), as defined in the following documents: i.A Photovoltaic Solar System Purchase and Install Agreement, incorporated herein as Exhibit A. ii.A Solar Energy Design and Installation Proposal, incorporated herein as Exhibit B. (Hereinafter “Exhibits”). iii.Where the terms and conditions of this Agreement and those terms and conditions included in the Exhibits specifically conflict, the terms of this Agreement shall apply. b. Contractor covenants and agrees to provide the Services to the satisfaction of the City in a timely fashion, as set forth in the Exhibits, subject to Section 8 of this Agreement. c.Contractor agrees to comply with all federal, state, and local laws and ordinances applicable to the Services to be performed under this Agreement, including all safety standards. Contractor shall be solely and completely responsible for conditions of the job site, including the safety of all persons and property during the performance of the Services. Contractor represents and warrants that it has the requisite training, skills, and experience necessary to provide the Services and is appropriately licensed and has obtained all permits from all applicable agencies and governmental entities. Docusign Envelope ID: 88AE440C-7A95-4C17-B5EA-2C6CB410C5DB 2 2.PAYMENT. a.City agrees to pay Contractor $143,672.00, and Contractor agrees to receive and accept payment for Services as set forth in Exhibit A. b.Any changes in the scope of the work of the Services that may result in an increase to the compensation due the Contractor shall require prior written approval by the authorized representative of the City or by the City Council. The City will not pay additional compensation for Services that do not have prior written authorization. c.Contractor shall submit itemized bills for Services provided to City in the manner outlined in Exhibit A. Bills submitted shall be paid in the same manner as other claims made to City. d.Prior to payment, the Contractor will submit evidence that all payrolls, material bills, subcontractors and other indebtedness connected with the Services have been paid as required by the City. 3.TERM. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the date listed in the initial paragraph of this Agreement and shall terminate on September 1, 2026, or upon Contractor’s completion of the Services identified in Exhibit A, whichever occurs first. This Agreement may be extended upon the written mutual consent of the parties for such additional periods as they deem appropriate, and upon the same terms and conditions as herein stated. 4.TERMINATION AND REMEDIES. a.Termination by Either Party. This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon thirty (30) days’ written notice delivered to the other party at the addresses listed in Section 14 of this Agreement. Upon termination under this provision, if there is no default by the Contractor, Contractor shall be paid for Services rendered and reimbursable expenses incurred through the effective date of termination. b.Termination Due to Default. This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon written notice in the event of substantial failure by the other party to perform in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. The non-performing party shall have fifteen (15) calendar days from the date of the termination notice to cure or to submit a plan for cure that is acceptable to the other party. c. Remedies. Notwithstanding the above, the Contractor shall not be relieved of liability to the City for damages sustained by the City as a result of any breach of this Agreement by the Contractor. The City may, in such event: Docusign Envelope ID: 88AE440C-7A95-4C17-B5EA-2C6CB410C5DB 3 i.Withhold payments due to the Contractor for the purpose of set-off until such time as the exact amount of damages due to the City is determined. ii.Perform the Services, in which case, the Contractor shall within thirty (30) days after written billing by the City, reimburse the City for any costs and expenses incurred by the City. The rights or remedies provided for herein shall not limit the City, in case of any default by the Contractor, from asserting any other right or remedy allowed by law, equity, or by statute. d.Upon termination of this Agreement, the Contractor shall furnish to the City copies or duplicate originals of all documents or memoranda prepared for the City not previously furnished. 5.SUBCONTRACTORS. Contractor shall not enter into subcontracts for any of the Services provided for in this Agreement without the express written consent of the City, unless specifically provided for in the Exhibits. Contractor shall pay any subcontractor involved in the performance of this Agreement within ten (10) days of the Contractor’s receipt of payment by the City for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. 6.STANDARD OF CARE. In performing its Services, Contractor will use that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable members of its profession in the same locality at the time the Services are provided. 7.INSPECTION OF WORK. All materials and workmanship will be subject to inspection, examination, and testing by the City, who will have the right to reject defective material and workmanship or require its correction. 8.DELAY IN PERFORMANCE. Neither City nor Contractor shall be considered in default of this Agreement for delays in performance caused by circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the nonperforming party. For purposes of this Agreement, such circumstances include, but are not limited to, abnormal weather conditions; floods; earthquakes; fire; epidemics; war, riots, and other civil disturbances; strikes, lockouts, work slowdowns, and other labor disturbances; sabotage; judicial restraint; and inability to procure permits, licenses or authorizations from any local, state, or federal agency for any of the supplies, materials, accesses, or services required to be provided by either City or Contractor under this Agreement. If such circumstances occur, the nonperforming party shall, within a reasonable time of being prevented from performing, give written notice to the other party describing the circumstances preventing continued performance and the efforts being made to resume performance of this Agreement. Contractor will be entitled to payment for its reasonable additional charges, if any, due to the delay. 9.CITY’S REPRESENTATIVE. The City has designated Zac Dockter to act as the City’s representative with respect to the Services to be performed under this Agreement. He Docusign Envelope ID: 88AE440C-7A95-4C17-B5EA-2C6CB410C5DB 4 shall have complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret, and define the City’s policy and decisions with respect to the Services covered by this Agreement. 10.PROJECT MANAGER AND STAFFING. The Contractor has designated Brok Johnson to be the primary contact for the City in the performance of the Services. He shall be assisted by other staff members as necessary to facilitate the completion of the Services in accordance with the terms established herein. Contractor may not remove or replace these designated staff without the approval of the City. 11.INDEMNIFICATION. a.Contractor and City each agree to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless each other, its agents and employees, from and against legal liability for all claims, losses, damages, and expenses to the extent such claims, losses, damages, or expenses are caused by its negligent acts, errors, or omissions. In the event claims, losses, damages, or expenses are caused by the joint or concurrent negligence of Contractor and City, they shall be borne by each party in proportion to its own negligence. b.Contractor shall indemnify City against legal liability for damages arising out of claims by Contractor’s employees or subcontractors, including all liens. City shall indemnify Contractor against legal liability for damages arising out of claims by City’s employees or subcontractors. 12.INSURANCE. During the performance of the Services under this Agreement, Contractor shall maintain the following insurance: a.Commercial General Liability Insurance, with a limit of $2,000,000 for any number of claims arising out of a single occurrence. b.Workers’ Compensation Insurance in accordance with statutory requirements. c.Automobile Liability Insurance, with a combined single limit of $2,000,000. Contractor shall furnish the City with certificates of insurance, which shall include a provision that such insurance shall not be canceled without written notice to the City. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the Commercial General Liability Insurance policy. 13.WARRANTIES. Contractor warrants and guarantees that title to all work, materials, and equipment covered by any invoice, will pass to City no later than the final completion date of all Services. Contractor warrants that all work will be free from defects and that all materials will be new and of first quality. If within one (1) year after final payment any work or material is found to be defective, Contractor shall promptly, without cost to the City, correct such defect. The Workmanship and Manufacturer Warranties outlined Docusign Envelope ID: 88AE440C-7A95-4C17-B5EA-2C6CB410C5DB 5 under Section 7 of Exhibit A shall survive the termination of this Agreement for the periods outlined therein. 14. NOTICES. Notices shall be communicated to the following addresses: If to City: City of Cottage Grove 12800 Ravine Parkway South Cottage Grove, MN 55016 Attention: City Administrator Or emailed: jlevitt@cottagegrovemn.gov If to Contractor: Solar Connection Inc. 6254 34th Avenue NW, Suite A Rochester, MN 55901 Attention: Brok Johnson Or emailed: brok.johnson@solarconnectioninc.com 15. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR STATUS. All services provided by Contractor, its officers, agents and employees pursuant to this Agreement shall be provided as employees of Contractor or as independent contractors of Contractor and not as employees of the City for any purpose. 16. GENERAL PROVISIONS. a. Assignment. This Agreement is not assignable without the mutual written agreement of the parties. b. Waiver. A waiver by either City or Contractor of any breach of this Agreement shall be in writing. Such a waiver shall not affect the waiving party’s rights with respect to any other or further breach. c. Nondiscrimination. Contractor agrees that in the hiring of employees to perform Services under this Agreement, Contractor shall not discriminate against any person by reason of any characteristic protected by state or federal law. d. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota and any action must be venued in Washington County District Court. e. Amendments. Any modification or amendment to this Agreement shall require a written agreement signed by both parties. Docusign Envelope ID: 88AE440C-7A95-4C17-B5EA-2C6CB410C5DB 6 f. Severability. If any term of this Agreement is found be void or invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the remaining terms of this Agreement, which shall continue in full force and effect. g. Data Practices Compliance. All data collected by the City pursuant to this Agreement shall be subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13. h. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes all prior communications, understandings and agreements relating to the subject matter hereof, whether oral or written. [The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank] Docusign Envelope ID: 88AE440C-7A95-4C17-B5EA-2C6CB410C5DB 7 CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE By: Myron A. Bailey, Mayor By: Tamara Anderson, City Clerk Date: Docusign Envelope ID: 88AE440C-7A95-4C17-B5EA-2C6CB410C5DB 8 SOLAR CONNECTION INC. (“CONTRACTOR”) Signature: Name: Its: Date: Docusign Envelope ID: 88AE440C-7A95-4C17-B5EA-2C6CB410C5DB Aaron Benson 09/10/2025 Sales Manager Photovoltaic Solar System Purchase and Install Agreement This agreement (“Agreement”) dated (“Effective Date”), is between Solar Connection Inc. (“Seller”) and City of Cottage Grove (“Buyer”). Seller shall sell, design, construct, and make commercially operational a photovoltaic system for Buyer in accordance with the following: 1.Parties Buyer: Seller: Name and Address City of Cottage Grove 12800 Ravine Parkway South Cottage Grove, MN 55016 Attention: Jennifer Levitt Name and Address Solar Connection, Inc. 6254 34th Avenue NW, Suite A Rochester, MN 55901 Attention: Aaron Benson Phone (651)458-2890 Phone (507)292-8400 E-mail jlevitt@cottagegrovemn.gov E-mail Aaron.benson@mathy.com Premises Ownership Purchaser X owns [_] leases the Premises. List Premises Owner, if different from Purchaser: Additional Seller Information EXHIBIT ADocusign Envelope ID: 88AE440C-7A95-4C17-B5EA-2C6CB410C5DB AGREEMENT – The parties to this contract agree as follows: 1.Scope of Work – Seller shall design and install one 55.77 KW DC (Fifty-Five and Seventy-Seven Hundredths Kilowatts Direct Current) solar project at the location detailed in Exhibit (A) “Scope of Work”. Final nameplate system size could change upon official measurements of space available. The agreed upon $/watt in this contract will remain the same within a 10% change from the above listed project size. 2.Purchase Price – Buyer will pay a total purchase price (“The Purchase Price”) for all systems of $143,672 (One Hundred Forty-Three Thousand Six Hundred Seventy-Two Dollars or ($2.58/watt). 3.Buyer agrees to pay The Purchase Price as follows: (5%) Plan Set Completion Payment: A payment of $7,184 Buyer agrees to pay seller this amount within Net 30 (thirty) days of receiving invoice from Seller at the time of execution of this contract. (45%) Equipment Payment: A second payment of $64,652. Buyer agrees to pay Seller this amount within Net 30 (thirty) days of receiving invoice from Seller at the time of material procurement. (45%) Material Completion of Work Payment: A third payment of $64,652. Buyer agrees to pay Seller this amount within Net 30 (thirty) days of receiving invoice upon mechanical completion of construction. (5%) Plant Operation/Commissioning Approval Payment: A fourth and final payment for the remaining balance of $7,184. Buyer agrees to pay Seller this amount within Net 30 (thirty) days of receiving invoice from Seller after the project has reached commercial operation. 4.System Ownership: Upon the commercial operation of the system Buyer shall be the rightful owner of the system. Buyer agrees to allow Seller reasonable access to the System to make necessary repairs and adjustments to maintain the estimated power production and to comply with the terms of all applicable manufacturers or other applicable warranties. 5.Incentives and REC’s (Renewable Energy Credits): Buyer shall retain all associated tax credits/incentives, renewable energy credits, utility or production incentives, and applicable grants or rebates, except for any incentives listed in Exhibit A as specifically belonging to Seller. Docusign Envelope ID: 88AE440C-7A95-4C17-B5EA-2C6CB410C5DB 6.Project Approval: Seller shall furnish to Buyer a detailed site layout and electrical diagram including construction and equipment specifications for solar facilities. Seller will obtain Buyer’s written approval for such plan prior to submitting the interconnection application to the utility, and prior to the commencement of any work. All equipment listed will be provided with original manufacturer’s warranties. An initial project design with proposed project area, and electrical connection points are attached in Exhibit (A). By signing this Agreement Buyer is agreeing to the general project area, and electrical connection points as set forth in Exhibits (A). 7.Warranties: Seller has the authority to sell the System to Buyer free of any liens, encumbrances, or claims of any third parties. A.Workmanship Warranty: Seller warrants the System will be free from material installation defects for a period of ten (10) years following the commercial operation date of the system. During such time Seller will repair and/or remedy material installation defects at no charge to Buyer. Seller will provide non-covered repair work (work that is required for issues that have arisen due to reasons other than material installation defects) at the current labor rates at that time minus any compensation provided by manufacturer warranties for labor. B.Manufacturer Warranties: All manufacturer warranties will be passed through to Buyer, and Seller will provide any manufacturer’s product and warranty documentation upon the commercial operation of the System. All solar panels used will come with a minimum 30- year linear performance warranty that guarantees the performance to be no less than 87% of year 1 production capacity. Seller will furnish to Buyer all applicable manufacturer warranty documentation in accordance with the listed manufacturers in Exhibits (A). 8.Warranty Disclaimer: A.Buyer’s Responsibilities: Buyer is responsible for all basic System maintenance and upkeep to maintain optimal performance of the system, such as trimming grass and weeds beneath ground mounts, and cleaning any substantial soiling of the system from dirt, dust, or other substances that may reduce the production of the system. Buyer is also responsible for maintaining site control and site access for the System. B.Disclaimer: SELLER’S AND ALL APPLICABLE MANUFACTURERS’ WARRANTIES DO NOT COVER DAMAGE DUE TO EXTERNAL CAUSES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE Docusign Envelope ID: 88AE440C-7A95-4C17-B5EA-2C6CB410C5DB FOLLOWING: ACCIDENT, ABUSE, MISUSE, ELECTRICAL POWER PROBLEMS CAUSED BY THE UTILITY COMPANY, SERVICE NOT PERFORMED OR AUTHORIZED BY SELLER (INCLUDING INSTALLATION OR DE-INSTALLATION), USAGE NOT IN ACCORDANCE WITH INSTRUCTIONS, NORMAL WEAR AND TEAR, WEATHER, NEGLIGENCE, USE OF PARTS AND COMPONENTS NOT SUPPLIED OR INTENDED FOR USE WITH THE SYSTEM AND ACTS OF GOD. EXCEPT AS SET FORTH EXPRESSLY IN THIS AGREEMENT, THE SYSTEM IS SOLD TO BUYER “AS IS” AND SELLER MAKES NO WARRANTIES AS TO THE NATURE, QUALITY, FUNCTIONALITY, PERFORMANCE, OR OTHER ATTRIBUTES OF THE SYSTEM. SELLER SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES AND CONDITIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE SYSTEM, INCLUDING ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. No agent, employee, or other representative of Seller is authorized to make any representations or warranties regarding the System other than those stated in this Agreement. 9.Risk: The ownership and risk of loss with respect to the System and all associated materials and equipment passes to Buyer when construction and commercial operation of the System is complete. Loss of or damage to the System after transfer of ownership will not release Buyer form their payment obligations under the terms of this Agreement. 10.Insurance: Upon commencing construction of the project and up until commercial operation of the system Seller shall maintain (A) Property insurance on the System for the replacement cost thereof, (B) commercial general liability insurance with coverage of at least $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 annual aggregate, (C) employer’s liability insurance with coverage of at least $1,000,000 and workers’ compensation insurance as required by law. 11.License: Buyer has title to or a leasehold or other property interest in the Premises. Buyer has the full right, power and authority to grant the License. Such grant of the License does not violate any law, ordinance, rule or other governmental restriction applicable to Buyer or the Facility and is not inconsistent with and will not result in a breach or default under any agreement by which Purchaser is bound or that affects the Facility. If Buyer does not own the Premises or Facility, Buyer has obtained all required consent from the owner of the Premises and/or Facility to grant the License and enter into and perform its obligations under this Agreement. Docusign Envelope ID: 88AE440C-7A95-4C17-B5EA-2C6CB410C5DB 12.General Representations and Warranties: Each Party represents and warrants to the other the following as of the Effective Date of this Agreement: A.Such Party is duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the jurisdiction of its formation; the execution, delivery and performance by such Party of this Agreement have been duly authorized by all necessary corporate, partnership or limited liability company action, as applicable, and do not and shall not violate any law; and this Agreement is valid obligation of such Party, enforceable against such Party in accordance with its terms (except as may be limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium and other similar laws now or hereafter in effect relating to creditors’ rights generally). B.Such Party has obtained all licenses, authorizations, consents, and approvals required by any Governmental Authority or other third party and necessary for such Party to own its assets, carry on its business and to execute and deliver this Agreement; and such Party is in compliance with all laws that relate to this Agreement in all material respects. 13.Use of Contractors and Subcontractors: Seller shall be permitted to use contractors and subcontractors to perform its obligations under this Agreement, provided however, that such contractors and subcontractors shall be duly licensed and shall provide any work in accordance with applicable industry standards. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Seller shall continue to be responsible for the quality of the work performed by its contractors and subcontractors. 14.Entire Agreement – This Agreement, along with the attached Exhibits, constitutes the entire Agreement between the Parties. Any prior proposals, negotiations, and representations not attached to this Agreement, or an applicable Exhibit have no force or effect. In the event of a conflict between the terms of any Exhibit and the foregoing terms of this Agreement, the terms of the Agreement shall prevail. Signature Page to Follow: Docusign Envelope ID: 88AE440C-7A95-4C17-B5EA-2C6CB410C5DB Signature Page: Signatures: The individuals signing below hereby represent that they are authorized to enter into this Agreement on behalf of the Party for whom they sign. City of Cottage Grove Solar Connection Inc. By: By: (SIGNATURE) (SIGNATURE) Name: Name: (Print) Title: Title: Date: Date: Docusign Envelope ID: 88AE440C-7A95-4C17-B5EA-2C6CB410C5DB 09/10/2025 Aaron Benson Sales Manager Exhibit A – Scope of Work 1.System Location: 11099 U.S. Hwy 61 Cottage Grove MN 55016 2.System Size (DC kW): 55.77 3.Expected First Year Energy Production (kWh): 62,500 4.Expected Structure: [☐] Ground Mount [☒] Roof Mount [☐] Parking Structure [☐] Other 5.Utility: Xcel Energy 6.Total Project Cost: $143,672 7.Expected Module(s): Manufacturer/Model Quantity VSUN 485 115 8.Expected Inverter(s): Manufacturer/Model Quantity Solar Edge 40KW Solar Edge Optimizers 1 115 Includes: [X]Design, engineering, permitting, installation, monitoring, rebate application, roof structural engineering analysis, removal of any ballast rock within project area, and paperwork processing of the System. [X]Limited Warranty. [X] Any like substantive equipment, in the sole discretion of the Seller. Excludes: Unforeseen groundwork (including, but not limited to, excavation/circumvention of underground obstacles), any necessary concrete footings, upgrades or repair to the Facility, Roof, or utility electrical infrastructure including Docusign Envelope ID: 88AE440C-7A95-4C17-B5EA-2C6CB410C5DB (Exhibit A continued) Project Area and Point of Interconnection *Final design may differ due to wiring and engineering needs. A Final Site Plan will be submitted to the Buyer for signature before proceeding with the project. Docusign Envelope ID: 88AE440C-7A95-4C17-B5EA-2C6CB410C5DB River Oaks ‐ 55.77 KW Solar Proposal City of Cottage Grove 11099 US‐61 ‐ Cottage Grove MN 55016 651‐458‐2808 zdockter@cottagegrovemn.gov Prepared By: Brok Johnson P: 507-459-0113, E: brok.johnson@solarconnectioninc.com Page 1 EXHIBIT BDocusign Envelope ID: 88AE440C-7A95-4C17-B5EA-2C6CB410C5DB TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 ABOUT US 3 2 PROJECT PORTFOLIO 4 3 PROJECT SUMMARY 5 4 PROJECT DETAILS 6 4.1 Meter #1 6 4.1.1 PV SYSTEM DETAILS 6 4.1.2 REBATES & INCENTIVES 7 4.1.3 CURRENT ELECTRIC BILL 7 4.1.4 NEW ELECTRIC BILL 8 5 CASH FLOW ANALYSIS 9 5.1 Cash Purchase 9 6 ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS 10 Prepared By: Brok Johnson P: 507-459-0113, E: brok.johnson@solarconnectioninc.com Page 2 Docusign Envelope ID: 88AE440C-7A95-4C17-B5EA-2C6CB410C5DB 1 ABOUT US Solar PV Solar + Battery Storage Solar + EV Chargers OUR HISTORY Solar Connection Inc. provides comprehensive design and financial analysis for commercial, municipal, Ag, and residential renewable energy projects. We pride ourselves on being the trusted experts our customers seek to reduce their energy costs, lower carbon emissions, and improve efficiencies. We specialize in providing turn-key solutions for solar PV, Energy Storage, and EV charging projects, as well as general electrical services. Solar Connection Inc. is a licensed electrical contractor in MN, WI, and IA that employs engineers, electricians, installers, and project managers. Our vertical integration allows us to provide turn-key solutions while managing all aspects of your project in house, enhancing the overall customer experience. We set ourselves apart by being experts in our field, and providing honest sustainable energy options for each customer we engage with. . * Preferred vendor on the state of MN master contract for solar installers OUR MISSION Our mission is to transform the lives of our customers along with the communities we serve by providing sustainable energy options that provide economical and environmental benefits for generations to come. We accomplish this by a commitment to 5 core values: *Integrity - We always do the right thing *Custodians - We are committed to the safety and wellness of our team, and the greater good of our communities *Accountability - We don't walk past a problem, and we accept responsibility *Relationships - We are committed to developing long-term partnerships with our team, partners and communities *Excellence - We are never satisfied as we strive to deliver the highest quality products and services every day Docusign Envelope ID: 88AE440C-7A95-4C17-B5EA-2C6CB410C5DB 2 PROJECT PORTFOLIO Over 750 projects completed! * Serving Minnesota & Wisconsin since 2010! * Over 11 Megawatts (MW) installed since our inception ranging in size from 10KW to over 1MW. * We handle all aspects of your project with Solar Connection personnel PROVEN TRACK RECORD & A 5‐STAR CUSTOMER RATING Hamilton Elementary System Rating: 97.8 KW DC Estimated 30 Year Savings: Over $300,000 and equivalent to offsetting over 250,000 gallons of gasoline consumed Location: La Crosse, WI Torrance Casting System Rating: 416.8 kW DC Estimated 30 Year Savings: Over $1.2 million and equivalent to offsetting over 24,000 barrels of oil consumed Location: La Crosse WI Cottage Grove Ice Arena System Rating: 281 kW DC Estimated 30 Year Savings: Over $1,000,000 and equivalent to the CO2 offset of planting over 111,000 trees Location: Cottage Grove, MN Docusign Envelope ID: 88AE440C-7A95-4C17-B5EA-2C6CB410C5DB 3 PROJECT SUMMARY Payment Options Cash Purchase IRR - Term 24.1% LCOE PV Generation $0.000 /kWh Net Present Value $128,851 Payback Period 1.0 Years Total Project Cost $143,672 Total Incentives $143,672 Net Payments $0 Electric Bill Savings - Term $315,296 30 Year Cash Flow Benefit $301,352 CUMULATIVE ENERGY COSTS BY PAYMENT OPTION COMBINED SOLAR PV RATING Power Rating:55.8 kW-DC Power Rating:39.8 kW-AC COMBINED ESS RATINGS Energy Capacity:0.0 kWh Power Rating:0.0 kW Year 0 Year 4 Year 8 Year 12 Year 16 Year 20 Year 24 Year 28 $0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000 $350,000 Cu m u l a t i v e E n e r g y C o s t s Avoided Utility Cost Cash Purchase Prepared By: Brok Johnson P: 507-459-0113, E: brok.johnson@solarconnectioninc.com Page 5 Docusign Envelope ID: 88AE440C-7A95-4C17-B5EA-2C6CB410C5DB 4 PROJECT DETAILS4.1 Meter #14.1.1 PV SYSTEM DETAILS GENERAL INFORMATION Facility:Meter #1 Address:11099 US-61 Cottage Grove MN 55016 SOLAR PV EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION Solar Panels:(115) VSUN485N-120BMH-BB Inverters:Standard Inverter SOLAR PV EQUIPMENT TYPICAL LIFESPAN Solar Panels:Greater than 30 Years Inverters:15 Years Solar PV System Cost and Incentives Solar PV System Cost $143,672 Direct pay - 30% ITC -$43,102 Incentive Amount -$100,570 Net Solar PV System Cost $0 SOLAR PV SYSTEM RATING Power Rating:55,775 W-DC ENERGY CONSUMPTION MIX Annual Energy Use:171,658 kWh Utility 103,565 kWh (60.33%) Solar PV 68,093 kWh (39.67%) MONTHLY ENERGY USE VS SOLAR GENERATION 1/12 - 2 / 1 2 2/12 - 3 / 1 2 3/12 - 4 / 1 2 4/12 - 5 / 1 2 5/12 - 6 / 1 2 6/12 - 7 / 1 2 7/12 - 8 / 1 2 8/12 - 9 / 1 2 9/12 - 1 0 / 1 2 10/1 2 - 1 1 / 1 2 11/1 2 - 1 2 / 1 2 12/1 2 - 1 / 1 2 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 En e r g y ( k W h ) Energy Use (kWh)Solar Generation (kWh) Prepared By: Brok Johnson P: 507-459-0113, E: brok.johnson@solarconnectioninc.com Page 6 Docusign Envelope ID: 88AE440C-7A95-4C17-B5EA-2C6CB410C5DB 4.1.2 REBATES & INCENTIVES This section summarizes all incentives available for this project. The actual rebate and incentive amounts for this project are shown in each example. 4.1.3 CURRENT ELECTRIC BILL The table below shows your annual electricity costs based on the most current utility rates and your previous 12 months of electrical usage. RATE SCHEDULE: XCEL-MN - GS - A14 Time Periods Energy Use (kWh)Max Demand (kW)Charges Bill Ranges & Seasons Total NC / Max Other Energy Demand Total 1/12/2025 - 2/12/2025 W 8,314 31 $38 $669 $548 $1,254 2/12/2025 - 3/12/2025 W 9,670 37 $38 $778 $548 $1,363 3/12/2025 - 4/12/2025 W 11,437 46 $38 $920 $615 $1,572 4/12/2024 - 5/12/2024 W 12,199 48 $38 $981 $641 $1,660 5/12/2024 - 6/12/2024 W / S 19,800 40 $38 $1,593 $621 $2,251 6/12/2024 - 7/12/2024 S 21,280 72 $38 $1,712 $1,324 $3,073 7/12/2024 - 8/12/2024 S 23,799 82 $38 $1,914 $1,508 $3,460 8/12/2024 - 9/12/2024 S 20,080 74 $38 $1,615 $1,361 $3,014 9/12/2024 - 10/12/2024 S / W 16,400 36 $38 $1,319 $678 $2,035 10/12/2024 - 11/12/2024 W 12,079 52 $38 $972 $695 $1,704 11/12/2024 - 12/12/2024 W 8,800 43 $38 $708 $574 $1,320 12/12/2024 - 1/12/2025 W 7,800 41 $38 $627 $548 $1,213 Total 171,658 -$452 $13,808 $9,660 $23,920 Direct Pay, Investment Tax Credit (ITC) ‐ 30% The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 2022 contains a "direct pay" provision that enables certain tax-exempt customers, including state and local government, to receive a direct cash payment in lieu of an investment tax credit (ITC). Entities that qualify for direct pay are eligible to receive a 30% direct payment, assuming they meet the IRA established prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements in order to qualify for the full 30% “increased rate”, rather than a 6% “base rate”. The IRA states that direct pay is only available for entities, including: an entity exempt from the tax, any State government (or political subdivision thereof), the Tennessee Valley Authority, an Indian tribal government, an Alaska Native Corporation, any corporation operating on a cooperative basis which is engaged in furnishing electric energy to persons in rural areas. These entities may take direct pay for solar and storage in the ITC and PTC as well as the ITC/PTC when tech neutral starts after 2025. Total Incentive Value: $43,102 Solar on Public Buildings Grant State of MN issued grant in the form of a re-imbursement that will award 70% of the cost of the solar project Total Incentive Value: $100,570 Prepared By: Brok Johnson P: 507-459-0113, E: brok.johnson@solarconnectioninc.com Page 7 Docusign Envelope ID: 88AE440C-7A95-4C17-B5EA-2C6CB410C5DB 4.1.4 NEW ELECTRIC BILL ANNUAL ELECTRICITY SAVINGS: $6,099 RATE SCHEDULE: XCEL-MN - GS - A14 Time Periods Energy Use (kWh)Max Demand (kW)Charges Bill Ranges & Seasons Total NC / Max Other Energy Demand Total 1/12/2025 - 2/12/2025 W 4,368 31 $38 $351 $501 $890 2/12/2025 - 3/12/2025 W 4,279 37 $38 $344 $501 $883 3/12/2025 - 4/12/2025 W 5,195 46 $38 $418 $615 $1,070 4/12/2024 - 5/12/2024 W 5,373 41 $38 $432 $548 $1,018 5/12/2024 - 6/12/2024 W / S 12,672 38 $38 $1,019 $575 $1,632 6/12/2024 - 7/12/2024 S 13,695 64 $38 $1,102 $1,177 $2,316 7/12/2024 - 8/12/2024 S 15,906 75 $38 $1,279 $1,379 $2,696 8/12/2024 - 9/12/2024 S 13,236 71 $38 $1,065 $1,306 $2,408 9/12/2024 - 10/12/2024 S / W 10,654 36 $38 $857 $620 $1,515 10/12/2024 - 11/12/2024 W 7,937 52 $38 $638 $695 $1,371 11/12/2024 - 12/12/2024 W 5,651 43 $38 $455 $574 $1,067 12/12/2024 - 1/12/2025 W 4,601 41 $38 $370 $548 $956 Total 103,567 -$452 $8,331 $9,038 $17,821 Prepared By: Brok Johnson P: 507-459-0113, E: brok.johnson@solarconnectioninc.com Page 8 Docusign Envelope ID: 88AE440C-7A95-4C17-B5EA-2C6CB410C5DB 5 CASH FLOW ANALYSIS 5.1 Cash Purchase Assumptions and Key Financial Metrics IRR - Term 24.1%Net Present Value $128,851 Payback Period 1.0 Years ROI 209.3%PV Degradation Rate 0.45%Discount Rate 5.0% Energy Cost Escalation Rate 4.0%Federal Income Tax Rate 0.0%State Income Tax Rate 0.0% Years Cash PV Generation (kWh) Total Cash Flow Cumulative Cash FlowInsurance/Operations & Maintenance Decommissioning Costs Project Cost Electric Bill Savings Direct pay - 30% ITC Incentive Amount Upfront -$279 --$143,672 -----$143,951 -$143,951 1 -$279 --$6,099 $43,102 $100,570 68,092 $149,491 $5,540 2 -$279 --$6,314 --67,785 $6,035 $11,575 3 -$279 --$6,537 --67,479 $6,258 $17,833 4 -$279 --$6,767 --67,173 $6,489 $24,322 5 -$279 --$7,006 --66,866 $6,727 $31,049 6 -$279 --$7,253 --66,560 $6,974 $38,023 7 -$279 --$7,508 --66,253 $7,229 $45,252 8 -$279 --$7,772 --65,947 $7,494 $52,746 9 -$279 --$8,046 --65,640 $7,767 $60,513 10 -$279 --$8,329 --65,334 $8,050 $68,562 11 -$279 --$8,621 --65,028 $8,342 $76,905 12 -$279 --$8,924 --64,721 $8,645 $85,549 13 -$279 --$9,237 --64,415 $8,958 $94,507 14 -$279 --$9,560 --64,108 $9,282 $103,789 15 -$279 --$9,895 --63,802 $9,616 $113,405 16 -$5,856 --$10,242 --63,496 $4,385 $117,791 17 -$279 --$10,600 --63,189 $10,321 $128,112 18 -$279 --$10,971 --62,883 $10,692 $138,803 19 -$279 --$11,354 --62,576 $11,075 $149,878 20 -$279 --$11,750 --62,270 $11,471 $161,350 21 -$279 --$12,160 --61,963 $11,881 $173,231 22 -$279 --$12,584 --61,657 $12,305 $185,536 23 -$279 --$13,022 --61,351 $12,743 $198,279 24 -$279 --$13,475 --61,044 $13,197 $211,475 25 -$279 --$13,944 --60,738 $13,665 $225,141 26 -$279 --$14,429 --60,431 $14,150 $239,290 27 -$279 --$14,930 --60,125 $14,651 $253,941 28 -$279 --$15,448 --59,819 $15,169 $269,110 29 -$279 --$15,983 --59,512 $15,705 $284,815 30 ---$16,537 --59,206 $16,537 $301,352 Totals:-$13,944 --$143,672 $315,296 $43,102 $100,570 1,909,463 $301,352 - Prepared By: Brok Johnson P: 507-459-0113, E: brok.johnson@solarconnectioninc.com Page 9 Docusign Envelope ID: 88AE440C-7A95-4C17-B5EA-2C6CB410C5DB 6 ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS OVER THE NEXT 30 YEARS, YOUR SYSTEM WILL DO MORE THAN JUST SAVE YOU MONEY. ACCORDING TO THE EPA'S GREENHOUSE GAS EQUIVALENCIES CALCULATOR https://www.epa.gov/energy/greenhouse‐gas‐equivalencies‐calculator, YOUR SOLAR PV SYSTEM WILL HAVE THE IMPACT OF REDUCING: 1,600 lbs of CO2 Offset 3,638,379 Miles Driven By Cars 24,003 Trees Planted Docusign Envelope ID: 88AE440C-7A95-4C17-B5EA-2C6CB410C5DB 1 City Council Action Request 7.R. Meeting Date 9/17/2025 Department Administration Agenda Category Action Item Title Leafline Labs – Medical Cannabis Combination Registration Staff Recommendation Approve the Medical Cannabis Combination Registration for Leafline Labs, LLC at the location of 8235 97th Street South, Cottage Grove, MN. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. Memo - Leafline(Medical Cannabis Combination) Memo 2. Memo - Public Safety 3. OCM Approval - Leafline Labs Combination License_EXP_09152026 Introduction • Zoning: A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) has been obtained. • Fees and Taxes: The required $1,500 registration fee has been paid, covering the initial year and first renewal. All property taxes, assessments, and city fees are current. • State License: A preliminary state license has been granted by the Office of Cannabis Management (OCM). • Background Check: The necessary background check has been passed. • Inspections: The business agrees to all inspections by local law enforcement or other authorized city officials during regular business hours, with compliance checks to be conducted at least once annually. Staff Recommendation MEDICAL CANNABIS COMBINATION BUSINESS LICENSE LEAFLINE LABS LLC Anthony Georgiadis 325 W Huron St Ste 700 Chicago, IL 60654 Approved Business Activities ●AU Cannabis Retailer Endorsement ●AU Manufacturing ●Extraction and Concentration Endorsement ●MED Cannabis Processor Endorsement ●Packaging ●Transport (internal facilities only) ●AU Cultivation Endorsement ●Edible Cannabinoid Product Handler Endorsement ●MED Cannabis Cultivation Endorsement ●MED Cannabis Retailer Endorsement ●Production of Customer (consumer) Products Endorsement The establishment listed above has been issued a medical cannabis combination business license by the Minnesota Office of Cannabis Management. This license has been issued under the authority of Minnesota Statutes, chapter 342. License Establishment Number : MDCMB-L25-000001 Expiration Date: September 15, 2026 Effective Date: September 15, 2025 Interim Director Chief Regulatory Officer Eric Taubel Max Zappia Scan for more information on this licensed business. 1 City Council Action Request 8.A. Meeting Date 9/17/2025 Department Finance Agenda Category Action Item Title Approve Disbursements Staff Recommendation Approve disbursements from 08-29-2025 through 09-11-2025 in the amount of $3,346,984.08. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. Expense Approval Report 9-17-2025 Council Meeting 2. Payroll Check Register 09-17-25 Council Meeting 3. UB Check Register 09-17-25 Council Meeting 1 City Council Action Request 9.A. Meeting Date 9/17/2025 Department Community Development Agenda Category Action Item Title Pine Hill Elementary School Staff Recommendation 1) Hold the public hearing to vacate certain easements within the Pine Hill Elementary School property at 9015 Hadley Avenue South. 2) Adopt Resolution 2025-140 to vacate certain easements within the Pine Hill Elementary School property at 9015 Hadley Avenue South. 3) Adopt Resolution 2025-141 to approve a Conditional Use Permit for an educational facility within a residential district. 4) Adopt Resolution 2025-143 to approve a Variance to allow a six- classroom building addition to Pine Hill Elementary School to encroach within the required 50-foot setback to the residential property line to the north. 5) Adopt Resolution 2025-142 to approve a site plan review for three additions totaling approximately 13,300 square feet and associated site work at Pine Hill Elementary School. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. Pine Hill CC Memo 2. Pine Hill Resolution - Easement Vacation 3. Pine Hill Resolution - Conditional Use Permit 4. Pine Hill Resolution - Variance 5. Pine Hill Resolution - Site Plan Review 6. Pine Hill Civil & Landscape Plans 7. Pine Hill Site Photometric Plan 8. Pine Hill Traffic Study Final 9. Pine Hill Traffic Review Memo 2025-08-11 10. Pine Hill Stormwater Summary 11. Pine Hill Plan Review Memo 2025-09-10 12. Pine Hill ISD #833 Project Narrative 13. Pine Hill Architectural Plans 14. Pine Hill Res. #2000-144 15. Pine Hill Mechanical Roof Plan + Ext. Elevations 16. Pine Hill Exterior Renderings TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator FROM: Kelly Becker, Associate Planner DATE: September 10, 2025 RE: Pine Hill Elementary School (9015 Hadley Avenue) for ISD 833 Proposal Wold Architects and Engineers (Applicant), on behalf of South Washington School District ISD 833 (Property Owner), has submitted a Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review for building additions at Pine Hill Elementary, 9015 Hadley Avenue . The additions include approximately 13,300 square feet for a six-classroom addition with a storm shelter area, a small gym addition, and an enclosed freezer addition. Additional interior improvements proposed include renovations to existing special education classrooms, accessibility-toilet upgrades, minor renovations to the kitchen, and long -term facility and maintenance work. The applicant has also submitted a Variance application to expand the classroom addition space into the required 50 - foot property line setback. Site Location City Council Staff Report – Pine Hill Elementary School Planning Case No. SP/CUP/V2025-016 September 10, 2025 Page 2 of 15 2024 Future Land Use Designation Review Schedule Application Received: July 29, 2025 Application Accepted: July 30, 2025 Planning Commission Meeting: August 25, 2025 City Council Meeting: September 17, 2025 60-Day Review Deadline: September 28, 2025 Background South Washington County School District had a successful referendum in 2023 for a total of 15 projects across the district including improvements at Cottage Grove buildings at Cottage Grove Middle School, Oltman Middle School, Grey Cloud Elementary, Pine Hill Elementary, and Park High School. There are currently about 520 students and 80 staff members, and the anticipated 5-year future capacity is approximately 650 students and up to 100 staff members. Prior site modifications include parking lot reconfiguration and pavement rehabilitation in 2020, a classroom addition in 1970, and an addition for a computer lab media center in 2000 (Resolution No. 00-144). Planning Considerations Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Pine Hill Elementary is zoned R-3, Single-Family Residential, and is guided as Public/Semi- Public on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Educational facilities are permitted within the R-3 zoning district with a Conditional Use Permit. Current Zoning City Council Staff Report – Pine Hill Elementary School Planning Case No. SP/CUP/V2025-016 September 10, 2025 Page 3 of 15 Site Plan The Applicant is proposing three separate additions to the Pine Hill Elementary School building. An approximate 10,500 square foot addition at the northeast corner of the building for new classroom space and storm shelter space, a 2,400 square foot addition at the southeast corner of the building for a gym addition and storage space, and a 340 square foot addition for enclosed freezer space. Variance Request – Property Line Setback The purpose of a variance is to allow variation from the application of City Code Title 11 if there are characteristics of the property that cause practical difficulties for the landowner/applicant to meet minimum code standards. Variances require the Applicant to submit an official application form with all information outlined in City Code Title 11-2-5. City Code Title 11-7-3(D) lists educa- tional facilities as subject to a Conditional Use Permit, provided that no building shall be located within 50 feet of any lot line abutting an R district. Additional applicable setbacks are shown below. Building Setbacks Required Setbacks Classroom Addition Proposed Gym Addition Proposed Freezer Addition Proposed Front Yard 25’ 400’ 437’ 320’ Abutting residential (north) 50’ 38’ 325’ 385’ Abutting residential (east) 50’ 95’ 200’ 319’ Abutting residential (south) 50’ >600’ >400’ >400’ City Council Staff Report – Pine Hill Elementary School Planning Case No. SP/CUP/V2025-016 September 10, 2025 Page 4 of 15 The proposed classroom addition on the northeast corner of the building will encroach into the required 50-foot setback with the residential property lines to the north; the property owner has submitted a variance request to allow the proposed classroom addition to be approximately 38.5 feet from the north property line. An existing non-conforming portion of the school housing the special education classrooms is approximately 35.5 feet from the north property line. All other setbacks will be met with each addition. Building Setbacks Variance Requirements With all variance requests, the Planning Commission must look to the zoning ordinance for guid - ance and direction. City Code Title 11-2-5: Variances, states the following: A. Purpose. The purpose of the variance is to allow variation from the strict application of the terms of this Title where, by reason of the exceptional physical characteristics of the property, the literal enforcement of the requirements of this Title would cause practical difficulties for the landowner. F. Findings. A variance may be granted only when all of the following conditions are found: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Title. 2. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with this Title. “Practical difficulties,” as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that all of the following must be found to apply: a. The property owner proposes to use the land in a reasonable manner for a use permitted in the zone where the land is located, but the proposal is not permitted by other official controls; City Council Staff Report – Pine Hill Elementary School Planning Case No. SP/CUP/V2025-016 September 10, 2025 Page 5 of 15 b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property and that are not created by the landowner; and c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. The applicant has stated the following in response to the proposal meeting variance requirements: • The proposal put the property to a reasonable use. o The project recommends the six-classroom addition be located on the North side of the building in order to connect to an existing offset corridor and functionally create a loop to the core of the building. This would be an efficient connection to utilize an existing circulation system and would subsequently connect two of the offset northwest classrooms back to the broader building. The proposed classroom addition would not exceed the northernmost limits/extents of the existing building but would cross the previously discussed 50-foot setback. • There are unique circumstances to the property not created by the landowner. o The 1970 Kindergarten Addition added two classrooms to the northwestern corner of the property, which exceed beyond the present -day 50-foot property setback. The proposed classroom addition will connect to this existing corridor and would not exceed beyond the existing building extents but would similarly encroach upon the current 50-foot setback. Feasibility investigations have been conducted to study the classroom addition on the other sides of the building. Findings are noted below: ▪ South: This project will include a new storm shelter through our classroom addition, which will require a dedicated water service. If we locate the storm shelter on the south side of the building, it will double the length of water required unless we remove and replace the recently installed pavement and playground. This pavement was provided in 2021, and we would like to avoid the disruption of any new and still functional material where possible. Similarly, the addition will require a sanitary sewer service, and we would intend to connect to the existing sewer that is on the northwest side of the site. The length of this run would present some challenges if the addition is located on the south side and would potentially require a lift station. There is an existing stormwater easement and stormwater pond on the south side of the building, and by providing the addition on the north, we would minimize the potential for any interference with this easement and stormwater pond. ▪ East: The topography on the east side of the building is steep and will present some challenges with the proposed addition; as such, we have been advised that the grade change on the north is preferred for a new addition. An addition on this side of the building would impact the amount of daylight that is currently received in existing classrooms and in the Media Center. There is a higher concentration of trees on the east side of the building that we would like to avoid, both from a landscape perspective and in preserving the identity of "Pine Hill." City Council Staff Report – Pine Hill Elementary School Planning Case No. SP/CUP/V2025-016 September 10, 2025 Page 6 of 15 ▪ West: The west side of the building would potentially interfere with the recently renovated parking lot (2021). Similar to the previously noted sentiment of preserving recent work, we would like to avoid disrupting any new and functional components of the site as much as possible. The addition on the West side would have a greater impact on the amount of daylighting to existing classroom windows. • The conditions upon which an application for a variance is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and are not applicable, generally to other property within the same zoning classifications. Please list the conditions that are unique o Existing site forces recommend that the addition be located on the North side of the building to avoid incurred site work. See attached narrative with unique site conditions that led the design team to place the classroom addition where it is currently proposed. • The proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets, or increase the danger of fire, or endanger the public safety. Please identify any potential impact the requested variance may have. o The project will not impede upon natural daylighting to adjacent properties, nor the ex - isting classrooms of the school. An increased risk of fire or public safety endangerment is not anticipated with this work. The addition on the North side will mitigate major work to the recently implemented parking lot. Additionally, the anticipated student growth is less than 100 students and would not create major disruption/congestion to adjacent traffic systems. See attached traffic study for additional traffic information Site Access and Traffic The site currently has three existing curb cuts off Hadley Avenue – north, central, and south locations. Traffic has been documented to regularly back up on to Hadley Avenue during peak hours, drop off and pick up, at the school. A traffic study was conducted by Transportation Collaborative & Consultants (TC2) to identify existing traffic operations, evaluate potential impacts of the proposed expansion, and recommend improvements if necessary for safe and efficient operations. A meeting between City staff and the school district was held to discuss the traffic study. No access changes are proposed, and site improvements were not identified as required in the study; however, further follow-up is needed to resolve the issues discussed, such as internal stacking options, external stacking options, and pedestrian improvements at Hadley Avenue and 92nd Street. This may also include modifications to crossing guard practices to minimize impacts of traffic on Hadley and in relation to the site access points (primarily the north entrance to the bus and employee parking area). The applicant shall continue to work with City staff to produce a formalized circulation plan for safe and efficient traffic flow during peak drop-off and pick-up hours. The site circulation plan must provide options for ensuring increased stacking of vehicles on site rather than on Hadley Avenue. City Council Staff Report – Pine Hill Elementary School Planning Case No. SP/CUP/V2025-016 September 10, 2025 Page 7 of 15 Site Access Locations Parking The current school staff and student count is 520 students and approximately 80 staff. With the proposed improvements, the 5-year projected capacity is 634 students and 100 staff. City Code Title 11-3-4 requires elementary schools to have 1 parking space for each classroom, plus 1 space for each 100-student capacity. In 2020, the school received a building permit for pavement rehabilitation and reconfiguring the parking lot. After that project was completed, Pine Hill Elementary now has 159 parking spaces onsite and is only required to have 42 parking spaces. The property is currently exceeding parking requirements and is therefore not proposing any additional parking spaces. Tree Preservation City Code Title 11-3-13 requires completion of a tree inventory (all qualifying trees) for the project area of a proposed development. For projects in residential districts, 40 percent of the qualifying caliper inches on a site are permitted to be removed without required mitigation. The Applicant is proposing removal of 10 trees, which will not exceed 40 percent of the total qualifying trees onsite; therefore, a tree mitigation plan is not required. The applicant did note that 3 trees from a prior project in 2020 were found dead onsite and will be replaced with 3 new trees. City Council Staff Report – Pine Hill Elementary School Planning Case No. SP/CUP/V2025-016 September 10, 2025 Page 8 of 15 Proposed Tree Removal Landscaping The Applicant has submitted a detailed landscape plan including proposed additional landscaping throughout the site. The required number of trees and shrubs for non-residential uses within a residential district is calculated with a coefficient rate found in Title 11 -3-12 and multiplied by the total disturbed site area. The total project disturbance area is approximately 69,932 square feet; therefore, 19 new deciduous trees, 18 new coniferous trees, and 41 shrubs are required. The applicant has proposed those exact numbers of plantings to be in compliance with ordinance requirements. Nonresidential uses operating within a residential district are required to preserve 30 percent of the site area as green/open space. With the proposed additions, the site will still retain over 50 percent open space area, and it is therefore compliant with this standard. The proposed total impervious surface across the site is approximately 38 percent. The R-3 zoning district permits a maximum of 40 percent impervious surface. No irrigation system exists on the site. The Applicant is not proposing to install an irrigation sys- tem; however, the applicant has provided a plan for ensuring establishment and survivability of the proposed sod and landscaping items with temporary watering measures. City Council Staff Report – Pine Hill Elementary School Planning Case No. SP/CUP/V2025-016 September 10, 2025 Page 9 of 15 North Landscape Plan South Landscape Plan City Council Staff Report – Pine Hill Elementary School Planning Case No. SP/CUP/V2025-016 September 10, 2025 Page 10 of 15 Screening and Mechanical Equipment The current trash enclosure area will remain in its existing place with existing screening composed of a masonry wall and vinyl slated chain link gate. The gate and bollard may be temporarily removed as needed for construction and reinstalled. Per City Code Title 11-3-9, ground mount mechanical equipment accessory to the principal structure 30 inches or greater shall be screened from public views with landscaping, berm, or screen wall. The new chiller unit and utility areas are proposed to be screened with an aluminum louvered screen wall, compliant with ordinance standards. No other fencing or retaining walls are proposed at any other locations on the site. Trash Enclosure and Ground Mechanical Equipment Screening New rooftop mechanical equipment is planned over the classroom and gym additions and will be screened in the same style consistent with the screening on the existing building. Additional rooftop ductwork is also proposed on the building, which will match the existing materials. Per City Code Title 11-3-9, rooftop mechanical equipment as viewed from the centerline of all adjacent right of ways and from property lines of all adjacent residential properties must be screened by a raised parapet, or with comparable and compatible exterior building materials. Materials and proposed screening are compliant with code standards. City Council Staff Report – Pine Hill Elementary School Planning Case No. SP/CUP/V2025-016 September 10, 2025 Page 11 of 15 Photometric Plan City code standard requires less than 0.5-foot candles to be measured at property lines for uses within residential zoning districts. No additional lighting is proposed in the parking lot area. Exterior lighting is proposed at exterior egress doors for the new additions. The Applicant has provided a photometric plan indicating new lighting is not intended to cast light into adjacent properties and will align with the requirements of 0.5 footcandles or less at the property line to the north. The south additions were not studied, as they are a significant distance further from the south property line. The light fixtures the applicant has shown on their photometric plan will direct light downwards. Architectural Materials City Code Title 11-3-11 requires nonresidential buildings within residential districts to use at least 3 different Class 1 materials and be composed of at least 65 percent Class 1 or 2 materials and not more than 10 percent of Class 4 materials. Class 1 and 2 materials include but are not limited to brick, stone, and glass. Class 4 materials include glass block, smooth concrete block, smooth scored concrete block, steel or aluminum siding, and wood. Currently almost 100 percent of the new addition walls are shown to be constructed of a class 1 material. The material above and below the windows is intended to be brick, but a different color to mimic the white stucco panels at these locations on the existing building. The only exterior materials that would not be considered class 1 material are the storm louvers below the windows at the class - room addition and the sheet metal coping at the top of the parapet walls. The storm louvers will be a hollow metal material, painted to match the window frames, and are required for storm shelter passive ventilation system, and the sheet metal coping is intended to match existing. The applicant provided a material board, which has been approved by the planning department. City Council Staff Report – Pine Hill Elementary School Planning Case No. SP/CUP/V2025-016 September 10, 2025 Page 12 of 15 City Council Staff Report – Pine Hill Elementary School Planning Case No. SP/CUP/V2025-016 September 10, 2025 Page 13 of 15 Easement There is an existing storm sewer easement and associated stormwater pipe in the northeast corner servicing the infiltration basin. This easement is proposed to be vacated, as the storm sewer is only supporting private stormwater from the School District and is functioning as the outlet to the infiltration basin and will thus be considered private. The City does not need the ability to access the pipe as it will be the responsibility of the property owner to maintain the infrastructure as a private stormwater pipe. Utilities The project will require the extension of sanitary sewer and water service lines. The utility lines will connect to internal service lines to avoid disruption to Hadley Avenue. The applicant has submitted civil plans with proposed utility work and shall comply with the City Engineer Review Memo dated 8/6/2025. A revised Civil set was submitted on 9/8/2025 and review comments were provided to the applicant on 9/10/2025. Final utility layout shall be approved by City staff. Grading and Storm Water Management The Applicant is proposing grading in multiple areas of the site to account for the additions. A detailed stormwater management plan was submitted, and the Applicant shall comply with all comments included in the City Engineer Review Memo dated 9/10/2025, and Stormwater Rules Summary Memo dated 5/6/2025 and any future amendments as approved by the City Engineer to these memos. An infiltration basin is proposed in the northeast corner of the property to City Council Staff Report – Pine Hill Elementary School Planning Case No. SP/CUP/V2025-016 September 10, 2025 Page 14 of 15 handle the newly created impervious area. A grading LOC will be required to be submitted prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Variance Findings The findings of fact for a favorable recommendation that were considered during the review are identified as follows: A. The additions to the existing building will house several classrooms, associated mechanicals, and recreational gym area, which are necessary to serve the educational needs of the growing community. B. The proposed building additions do not alter the character of the residential neighborhood, as the additions will closely match the appearance of the existing building. C. The building has been designed to minimize the impacts to the residential neighborhood by constructing the addition on the north side of the property, no further to the property line than an existing portion of the building. D. The location of the expansion on the north side of the building is guided by connection feasi - bility unique to the existing building and not created by the property owner. E. The proposed use of the site requires additional site improvements as part of the CUP for an educational use. The proposed use is permitted in a residential district with a CUP and standards have been reviewed under the CUP and site plan review application. Neighborhood Meeting The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on August 20, 2025. Notice of the neighborhood meeting was sent to 163 surrounding property owners within 500 feet of the project area. The intent of the meeting was to give the neighboring property owners the opportunity to ask questions and present concerns they might have to the Applicant. One property owner was in attendance, as well as the Pine Hill Elementary School Principal and several team members from the School District, and Wold Architects and Engineers who gave an overview of the project. No concerns were expressed by the property owner in attendance. Public Hearing Notices The public hearing notice for the August 25, 2025, Planning Commission meeting was pub lished in the Saint Paul Pioneer Press and mailed to 163 property owners within 500 feet of the proposed project on August 13, 2025. Staff have not received any written comments at the time of writing the report. Planning Commission Meeting The City’s Planning Commission reviewed and held a public hearing on the applications at their August 25, 2025, meeting. Below is a summary of the inquiry and Planning Commission requests for clarification. The Commission unanimously voted (5-to-0) to recommend approval. Planning Commission Requests for clarification: • Have staff received any feedback since the publication of this report from the public or neighbors regarding this project? City Council Staff Report – Pine Hill Elementary School Planning Case No. SP/CUP/V2025-016 September 10, 2025 Page 15 of 15 o Staff reported that no comments were received, written or verbal. • Are there any concerns with water drainage or standing water onsite from the pond in the northeast corner with the vacation. o Staff clarified that the existing stormwater pipe will actually remain in place to drain water out of the basin as an emergency overflow pipe, but will become part of the School District’s stormwater management system. It is an infiltration basin, meaning it will be dry and not retain water. Only the easement will be vacated, and the pipe will remain. Recommendation The City Council is recommended to take the following actions: 1. Hold the public hearing to vacate certain easements within the Pine Hill Elementary School property at 9015 Hadley Avenue South. 2. Adopt Resolution 2025-140 certain easements within the Pine Hill Elementary School property at 9015 Hadley Avenue South. 3. Adopt Resolution 2025-141 to approve a Conditional Use Permit for an educational facility within a residential district. 4. Adopt Resolution 2025-143 to approve a Variance to allow a six-classroom building addition to encroach within the required 50-foot setback to the residential property line to the north. 5. Adopt Resolution 2025-142 to approve a site plan review for three additions totaling approximately 13,300 square feet and associated site work at Pine Hill Elementary School. Attachments Civil Set dated 9/8/2025 Plan Review memo dated 9/10/2025 Site Photometric Plan dated 7/18/2025 Traffic Study dated 7/16/2025 Traffic Review dated 8/11/2025 Stormwater Summary 5/6/2025 Plan Review memo 9/10/2025 Pine Hill Project Narrative Architectural Plans Resolution No. 00-144 Mechanical Roof Plans Exterior Renderings 1 CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2025-140 RESOLUTION VACATING CERTAIN EASEMENTS LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 412.851, the City Council may vacate any street, alley, public grounds, public way or any part thereof within the City by Resolution; and WHEREAS, the City initiated the vacation of an easement over that certain real property in Cottage Grove, Minnesota, legally described on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein (the “Property”); and WHEREAS, the easement is depicted on Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein (the “Easement”; and WHEREAS, a notice of a public hearing on said vacation was duly published and posted in accordance with applicable Minnesota Statutes and a public hearing was held on said vacation; and WHEREAS, the City Council of Cottage Grove then proceeded to hear all persons interested in said vacation and all persons interested were afforded an opportunity to present their views and objections to the granting of said vacation; and WHEREAS, the City Council of Cottage Grove has determined that the vacation would be in the public’s interest. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, County of Washington, State of Minnesota: 1.That the City of Cottage Grove, pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 412.851, hereby vacates the Easement, which was approved on July 24, 2018 and recorded as Document No. 4162046 in the Washington County Recorder’s Office, over that certain real property legally described on Exhibit A. 2.That said vacation has no relationship to the City’s Comprehensive Plan and therefore the Cottage Grove City Council has dispensed with the requirements of Minn. Stat. § 462.356, Subd. 2, that may require the Cottage Grove Planning Commission to perform a Comprehensive Plan 2 compliance review of said vacation that may constitute a disposal of real property pursuant to § 462.356, Subd. 2. 3.That the City Clerk shall prepare a notice to be presented to the Washington County Auditor reflecting the completion of the proceedings herein. Passed this 17th day of September, 2025 A-1 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY That certain real property located in County of Washington, State of Minnesota, legally described as follows: The North Six Hundred Twenty-eight and Ninety-three Hundredths (628.93) feet of the West Seven Hundred Twenty-five and Sixty Hundredths (725.60) feet of the Northwest Quarter (NW1/4) of the Northwest Quarter (NW1/4) of Section Twenty (20), Township Twenty-seven (27) North, Range Twenty- one (21) West, subject to Cherry Avenue on and across the Westerly Thirty- three (33) feet thereof, Washington County, Minnesota. PID No.: 20.027.21.22.0002 Abstract Property B-1 EXHIBIT B DEPICTION OF PROPERTY CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2025-141 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN EDUCATIONAL FACILITY AT PINE HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LOCATED AT 9015 HADLEY AVENUE SOUTH WHEREAS, Wold Architects and Engineers, on behalf of South Washington School District ISD 833, applied for a conditional use permit (CUP) for expansion of the school use and building additions as an educational facility, for the property legally described below: Parcel 1: The North Six Hundred Twenty-eight and Ninety-three Hundredths (628.93) feet of the West Seven Hundred Twenty-five and Sixty Hundredths (725.60) feet of the Northwest quarter (NW1/4) of the Northwest Quarter (NW1/4) of Section Twenty (20), Township Twenty-seven (27) North, Range Twenty-one (21) West, according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situate in Washington County, Minnesota. Abstract Property PID: 20.027.21.22.0002 Parcel 2: The South 188.68 feet of the North 817.61 feet of the West 725.60 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (NW1/4 of NW1/4) of Section Twenty (20), Township Twenty-seven (27) North, Range Twenty-one (21) West according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situate in Washington County, Minnesota. Abstract Property PID: 20.027.21.22.0001 Commonly known as 9015 Hadley Avenue South, Cottage Grove, Washington County, State of Minnesota. WHEREAS, in 2000 a CUP and Site Plan Review for expansion of the school use and con- struction of an addition was approved for Pine Hill Elementary School as Resolution 2000-144; and WHEREAS, the Applicant proposes to expand an existing building and obtain CUP approval for the existing use; therefore, the City desires to rescind the prior CUP and Site Plan Resolution (Resolution No. 2000-144) and approve a new CUP for the existing education facility use; and WHEREAS, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within 500 feet of the property and a public hearing notice was published in the St. Paul Pioneer Press; and WHEREAS, a planning staff report, which detailed specific information on the property and the application request, was prepared and presented; and City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota City Council Resolution 2025-141 Page 2 of 3 WHEREAS, the public hearing was open for public testimony. No public testimony was received. The applicant attended the public hearing and staff answered questions from the Plan - ning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission unanimously (5-to-0 vote) recommended that the City Council approve the conditional use permit at their August 25, 2025, meeting. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, Washington County, Minnesota, hereby approves the conditional use permit for an educational facility on the parcel legally described above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, approval of the conditional use permit is subject to the conditions below: 1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the conditions of approval for the submitted plans. Any significant changes to the plans, as determined by planning staff, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the School District shall incorporate the rec- ommendations, requirements, and evaluations noted in the comment letter dated 9/10/2025, and subject to modifications that are agreed to by the Applicant and City Engineer. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference. 3. Resolution No. 00-144 shall be rescinded. 4. All applicable permits (i.e., building, demo, electrical, grading, right-of-way and mechanical) and a commercial plan review packet must be completed, submitted, and approved by the City prior to the commencement of any construction activities. De- tailed construction plans must be reviewed and approved by the Building Official, City Engineer, and Fire Marshal. 5. The Applicant must provide the City with an as-built survey of all utilities and grading plan. 6. All areas of the site, where practical, shall be established and maintained per the approved final landscaping plan. 7. Signage is not approved as part of this application. Any proposed signage shall meet the requirements of the sign ordinance and require a separate building permit. Passed this 17th day of September 2025. Myron Bailey, Mayor City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota City Council Resolution 2025-141 Page 3 of 3 Attest: Tamara Anderson, City Clerk CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2025-143 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FOR A CLASSROOM BUILDING ADDITION WITHIN THE REQUIRED 50-FOOT SETBACK TO THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LINE TO THE NORTH AT 9015 HADLEY AVENUE SOUTH WHEREAS, Wold Architects and Engineers, on behalf of South Washington School District ISD 833, applied for a variance to construct a six-classroom addition within the required 50-foot setback to the residential property line to the north at 9015 Hadley Avenue South, legally described as: Parcel 1: The North Six Hundred Twenty-eight and Ninety-three Hundredths (628.93) feet of the West Seven Hundred Twenty-five and Sixty Hundredths (725.60) feet of the Northwest quarter (NW1/4) of the Northwest Quarter (NW1/4) of Section Twenty (20), Township Twenty-seven (27) North, Range Twenty-one (21) West, according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situate in Washington County, Minnesota. Abstract Property PID: 20.027.21.22.0002 Parcel 2: The South 188.68 feet of the North 817.61 feet of the West 725.60 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (NW1/4 of NW1/4) of Section Twenty (20), Township Twenty-seven (27) North, Range Twenty-one (21) West according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situate in Washington County, Minnesota. Abstract Property PID: 20.027.21.22.0001 Commonly known as 9015 Hadley Avenue South, Cottage Grove, Washington County, State of Minnesota. WHEREAS, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within 500 feet of the property and a public hearing notice was published in the St. Paul Pioneer Press; and WHEREAS, a planning staff report, which detailed specific information on the property and the application request, was prepared and presented; and WHEREAS, the public hearing was open for public testimony. No public testimony was received. Staff answered questions from the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission unanimously (5-to-0 vote) recommended that the City Council approve the variance to construct the classroom addition within the 50-foot setback as shown on the site plan at their August 25, 2025, meeting. City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota City Council Resolution 2025-143 Page 2 of 3 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, Washington County, Minnesota, hereby approves the variance to construct a classroom addition approximately 38.5 feet from the north property line when 50 feet is the required setback for educational facilities in residential zoning districts, on the parcel legally described above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, granting the variance to the minimum residential property line setback for educational facilities in a residential district is based on the following findings of fact: A. The additions to the existing building will house several classrooms, associated mechanicals, and recreational gym area, which are necessary to serve the educational needs of the growing community. B. The proposed building additions do not alter the character of the residential neighborhood, as the additions will closely match the appearance of the existing building. C. The building has been designed to minimize the impacts to the residential neighborhood by constructing the addition on the north side of the property, no further to the property line than an existing portion of the building. D. The location of the expansion on the north side of the building is guided by connection feasibility unique to the existing building and not created by the property owner. E. The proposed use of the site requires additional site improvements as part of the conditional use permit (CUP) for an educational use. The proposed use is permitted in a residential district with a CUP, and standards have been reviewed under the CUP and site plan review application. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, approval of the variances is subject to the conditions below: 1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the conditions of approval for the submitted plans. Any significant changes to the plans, as determined by planning staff, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the School District shall incorporate the recommendations, requirements, and evaluations noted in the comment letter dated 8/6/2025, and subject to modifications that are agreed to by the Applicant and City Engineer. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference. 3. All applicable permits (i.e., building, demo, electrical, grading, right-of-way and mechanical) and a commercial plan review packet must be completed, submitted, and approved by the City prior to the commencement of any construction activities. Detailed construction plans must be reviewed and approved by the Building Official, City Engineer, and Fire Marshal. City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota City Council Resolution 2025-143 Page 3 of 3 Passed this 17th day of September 2025. Myron Bailey, Mayor Attest: Tamara Anderson, City Clerk CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2025-142 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR THREE BUILDING ADDITIONS AND ASSOCIATED SITE WORK AT PINE HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LOCATED AT 9015 HADLEY AVENUE SOUTH WHEREAS, Wold Architects and Engineers, on behalf of South Washington School District ISD 833, applied for a site plan review for three building additions to the existing school building, totaling approximately 13,300 square feet, for the property legally described below: Parcel 1: The North Six Hundred Twenty-eight and Ninety-three Hundredths (628.93) feet of the West Seven Hundred Twenty-five and Sixty Hundredths (725.60) feet of the Northwest quarter (NW1/4) of the Northwest Quarter (NW1/4) of Section Twenty (20), Township Twenty-seven (27) North, Range Twenty-one (21) West, according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situate in Washington County, Minnesota. Abstract Property PID: 20.027.21.22.0002 Parcel 2: The South 188.68 feet of the North 817.61 feet of the West 725.60 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (NW1/4 of NW1/4) of Section Twenty (20), Township Twenty-seven (27) North, Range Twenty-one (21) West according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situate in Washington County, Minnesota. Abstract Property PID: 20.027.21.22.0001 Commonly known as 9015 Hadley Avenue South, Cottage Grove, Washington County, State of Minnesota. WHEREAS, in 2000 a Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review for expansion of the school use and construction of an addition was approved for Pine Hill Elementary School as Reso- lution 2000-144; and WHEREAS, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within 500 feet of the property ,and a public hearing notice was published in the St. Paul Pioneer Press; and WHEREAS, a planning staff report, which detailed specific information on the property and the application request, was prepared and presented; and WHEREAS, the public hearing was open for public testimony. No public testimony was received. The applicant attended the public hearing and staff answered questions from the Plan - ning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission unanimously (5-to-0 vote) recommended that the City Council approve the site plan review at their August 25, 2025, meeting. City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota City Council Resolution 2025-142 Page 2 of 3 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, Washington County, Minnesota, hereby approves the site plan review for three building additions and associated site work on the parcel legally described above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, approval of the site plan review is subject to the conditions listed below: 1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted by the condi- tions of approval. Any significant changes to the plans, as determined by planning staff, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the School District shall incorporate the rec- ommendations, requirements, and evaluations noted in the comment letter dated 9/10/2025 and plan review letter dated 9/10/2025, and subject to modifications that are agreed to by the Applicant and City Engineer. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference. 3. An easement vacation shall be recorded for the portion of the stormwater sewer pipe in the northeast corner of the property prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 4. Resolution No. 00-144 shall be rescinded. 5. All applicable permits (i.e., building, demo, electrical, grading, right-of-way and mechanical) and a commercial plan review packet must be completed, submitted, and approved by the City prior to the commencement of any construction activities. De- tailed construction plans must be reviewed and approved by the Building Official, City Engineer, and Fire Marshal. 6. Installation of landscaping shall occur in a timely fashion and be consistent with an approved plan. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a letter of credit in the amount of 150 percent of the landscape estimate shall be submitted to the City as required by City ordinance. The financial guarantee shall be held until all required plantings are installed. At such time of installation, the Planning Department shall conduct an in- spection to verify compliance with the landscape plan. If the inspection is approved, 50 percent of the financial guarantee shall be released. One year from the date of initial inspection, a follow-up inspection shall be conducted to verify survivability. If the follow- up inspection is approved, the remainder of the financial guarantee shall be released. 7. Temporary site irrigation shall occur for newly landscaped areas, and the applicant shall be responsible for ensuring establishment and survivability of the proposed sod and landscape items. 8. The grading and erosion control plan for the site must comply with NPDES II permit requirements. Erosion control devices must be installed prior to commencement of any grading activity. Erosion control must be performed in accordance with the recom- mended practices of the “Minnesota Construction Site Erosion and Sediment Control Planning Handbook” and the conditions stipulated in Title 9-7-1, Erosion Control City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota City Council Resolution 2025-142 Page 3 of 3 During Construction, of the City’s Subdivision Ordinance. The Applicant shall be re- sponsible for the costs for the City to inspect the site in relation to erosion control conformance. 9. The Applicant must provide the City with an as-built survey of all utilities and grading plan. 10. The Applicant is responsible for removing debris from all adjacent public and private roadways during their grading and construction process. The adjacent streets shall be swept clean daily or as needed. 11. All areas of the site, where practical, shall be established and maintained per the approved final landscaping plan. 12. The ground-mounted chiller unit and utility units shall be screened in compliance with City Code Title 11-3-9. 13. Any proposed fencing shall be reviewed and approved by planning staff in compliance with City Code Title 11-3-6. 14. Signage is not approved as part of this application. Any proposed signage shall meet the requirements of the sign ordinance and require a separate building permit. 15. A grading LOC is required prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 16. A site improvement LOC will be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Passed this 17th day of September 2025. Myron Bailey, Mayor Attest: Tamara Anderson, City Clerk F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: License Number: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed under the laws of the State of Scale: Date 9/ 5 / 2 0 2 4 1 : 4 2 : 0 6 P M ar c h _ 2 4 2 5 9 _ r 2 3 _ d e t a c h e d . r v t KAB AMY 09/08/2025 242224 Minnesota 09/08/2025 Nathaniel P. Anderson 59311 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER Revisions Description Date Num Pine Hill Elementary School Addition and Renovation 9015 HADLEY AVE S, COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 ISD #833: SOUTH WASHINGTON COUNTY SCHOOLS 8400 E. Point Douglas Rd S., Cottage Grove, MN 55016 © 2024 BKBM Engineers Bakke Kopp Ballou & McFarlin, Inc. All rights reserved. This document is an instrument of service and is the property of BKBM Engineers and may not be used or copied without prior written consent. BKBM Project No. 24259.50 6120 Earle Brown Drive Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55430 Phone: 763.843.0420 bkbm.com CITY RESUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION C1.000 SELECTIVE SITE DEMOLITION AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: License Number: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed under the laws of the State of Scale: Date 9/ 5 / 2 0 2 4 1 : 4 2 : 0 6 P M ar c h _ 2 4 2 5 9 _ r 2 3 _ d e t a c h e d . r v t KAB AMY 09/08/2025 242224 Minnesota 09/08/2025 Nathaniel P. Anderson 59311 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER Revisions Description Date Num Pine Hill Elementary School Addition and Renovation 9015 HADLEY AVE S, COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 ISD #833: SOUTH WASHINGTON COUNTY SCHOOLS 8400 E. Point Douglas Rd S., Cottage Grove, MN 55016 © 2024 BKBM Engineers Bakke Kopp Ballou & McFarlin, Inc. All rights reserved. This document is an instrument of service and is the property of BKBM Engineers and may not be used or copied without prior written consent. BKBM Project No. 24259.50 6120 Earle Brown Drive Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55430 Phone: 763.843.0420 bkbm.com CITY RESUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION C2.000 GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: License Number: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed under the laws of the State of Scale: Date 9/ 5 / 2 0 2 4 1 : 4 2 : 0 6 P M ar c h _ 2 4 2 5 9 _ r 2 3 _ d e t a c h e d . r v t KAB AMY 09/08/2025 242224 Minnesota 09/08/2025 Nathaniel P. Anderson 59311 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER Revisions Description Date Num Pine Hill Elementary School Addition and Renovation 9015 HADLEY AVE S, COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 ISD #833: SOUTH WASHINGTON COUNTY SCHOOLS 8400 E. Point Douglas Rd S., Cottage Grove, MN 55016 © 2024 BKBM Engineers Bakke Kopp Ballou & McFarlin, Inc. All rights reserved. This document is an instrument of service and is the property of BKBM Engineers and may not be used or copied without prior written consent. BKBM Project No. 24259.50 6120 Earle Brown Drive Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55430 Phone: 763.843.0420 bkbm.com CITY RESUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION C3.000 UTILITY PLAN F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: License Number: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed under the laws of the State of Scale: Date 9/ 5 / 2 0 2 4 1 : 4 2 : 0 6 P M ar c h _ 2 4 2 5 9 _ r 2 3 _ d e t a c h e d . r v t KAB AMY 09/08/2025 242224 Minnesota 09/08/2025 Nathaniel P. Anderson 59311 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER Revisions Description Date Num Pine Hill Elementary School Addition and Renovation 9015 HADLEY AVE S, COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 ISD #833: SOUTH WASHINGTON COUNTY SCHOOLS 8400 E. Point Douglas Rd S., Cottage Grove, MN 55016 © 2024 BKBM Engineers Bakke Kopp Ballou & McFarlin, Inc. All rights reserved. This document is an instrument of service and is the property of BKBM Engineers and may not be used or copied without prior written consent. BKBM Project No. 24259.50 6120 Earle Brown Drive Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55430 Phone: 763.843.0420 bkbm.com CITY RESUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION C4.000 PAVING AND GEOMETRIC PLAN F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: License Number: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed under the laws of the State of Scale: Date 9/ 5 / 2 0 2 4 1 : 4 2 : 0 6 P M ar c h _ 2 4 2 5 9 _ r 2 3 _ d e t a c h e d . r v t KAB AMY 09/08/2025 242224 Minnesota 09/08/2025 Nathaniel P. Anderson 59311 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER Revisions Description Date Num Pine Hill Elementary School Addition and Renovation 9015 HADLEY AVE S, COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 ISD #833: SOUTH WASHINGTON COUNTY SCHOOLS 8400 E. Point Douglas Rd S., Cottage Grove, MN 55016 © 2024 BKBM Engineers Bakke Kopp Ballou & McFarlin, Inc. All rights reserved. This document is an instrument of service and is the property of BKBM Engineers and may not be used or copied without prior written consent. BKBM Project No. 24259.50 6120 Earle Brown Drive Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55430 Phone: 763.843.0420 bkbm.com CITY RESUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION C5.000 CIVIL DETAILS · · · F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: License Number: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed under the laws of the State of Scale: Date 9/ 5 / 2 0 2 4 1 : 4 2 : 0 6 P M ar c h _ 2 4 2 5 9 _ r 2 3 _ d e t a c h e d . r v t KAB AMY 09/08/2025 242224 Minnesota 09/08/2025 Nathaniel P. Anderson 59311 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER Revisions Description Date Num Pine Hill Elementary School Addition and Renovation 9015 HADLEY AVE S, COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 ISD #833: SOUTH WASHINGTON COUNTY SCHOOLS 8400 E. Point Douglas Rd S., Cottage Grove, MN 55016 © 2024 BKBM Engineers Bakke Kopp Ballou & McFarlin, Inc. All rights reserved. This document is an instrument of service and is the property of BKBM Engineers and may not be used or copied without prior written consent. BKBM Project No. 24259.50 6120 Earle Brown Drive Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55430 Phone: 763.843.0420 bkbm.com CITY RESUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION C5.001 CIVIL DETAILS F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: License Number: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed under the laws of the State of Scale: Date 9/ 5 / 2 0 2 4 1 : 4 2 : 0 6 P M ar c h _ 2 4 2 5 9 _ r 2 3 _ d e t a c h e d . r v t KAB AMY 09/08/2025 242224 Minnesota 09/08/2025 Nathaniel P. Anderson 59311 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER Revisions Description Date Num Pine Hill Elementary School Addition and Renovation 9015 HADLEY AVE S, COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 ISD #833: SOUTH WASHINGTON COUNTY SCHOOLS 8400 E. Point Douglas Rd S., Cottage Grove, MN 55016 © 2024 BKBM Engineers Bakke Kopp Ballou & McFarlin, Inc. All rights reserved. This document is an instrument of service and is the property of BKBM Engineers and may not be used or copied without prior written consent. BKBM Project No. 24259.50 6120 Earle Brown Drive Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55430 Phone: 763.843.0420 bkbm.com CITY RESUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION C5.001 CIVIL DETAILS 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 C6.000 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLANF E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: License Number: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed under the laws of the State of Scale: Date 9/ 5 / 2 0 2 4 1 : 4 2 : 0 6 P M ar c h _ 2 4 2 5 9 _ r 2 3 _ d e t a c h e d . r v t KAB AMY 09/08/2025 242224 Minnesota 09/08/2025 Nathaniel P. Anderson 59311 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER Revisions Description Date Num Pine Hill Elementary School Addition and Renovation 9015 HADLEY AVE S, COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 ISD #833: SOUTH WASHINGTON COUNTY SCHOOLS 8400 E. Point Douglas Rd S., Cottage Grove, MN 55016 © 2024 BKBM Engineers Bakke Kopp Ballou & McFarlin, Inc. All rights reserved. This document is an instrument of service and is the property of BKBM Engineers and may not be used or copied without prior written consent. BKBM Project No. 24259.50 6120 Earle Brown Drive Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55430 Phone: 763.843.0420 bkbm.com CITY RESUBMITTAL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B1 B3 B4 B2 B5 A1 A2 A3 C1 C2 C3EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED ADDITION PROPOSED ADDITION PROPOSED ADDITION HA D L E Y A V E N U E S ( F O R M E R L Y C H E R R Y A V E ) EXISTING BASIN WORK LIMITS LINE WORK LIM I T S L I N E WORK LIMITS LINE 1 1 1 2 2 3 5 7 2 5 4 6 8 7 8 2 5 2 EXISTING 2020 TREES TO REMAIN (TYP.) EXISTING 2020 TREES TO REMAIN (TYP.) EXISTING 2020 TREES TO REMAIN (TYP.) EXISTING 2020 TREES TO REMAIN (TYP.) EXISTING 2020 TREE TO REMOVE (TYP.) EXISTING 2020 TREE TO REMOVE (TYP.) EXISTING 2020 TREE TO REMOVE (TYP.) EXISTING 2020 TREE TO BE SPADED AND RELOCATED PER PLAN UTILITY EASEMENT UTILITY EASEMENT UTILITY EASEMENT 6 PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PR O P E R T Y L I N E PR O P E R T Y L I N E PR O P E R T Y L I N E PR O P E R T Y L I N E PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE TREE PRESERVATION EXHIBIT AND EXISTING CONDITIONS: License Number:Date 09/08/2025 Benjamin D. Hartberg 48084 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of MN DESIGN GROUP Landscape Architecture | Planning F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: BH AL 09/08/2025 242224 Revisions Description Date Num Pine Hill Elementary School Addition and Renovation 9015 HADLEY AVE S, COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 ISD #833: SOUTH WASHINGTON COUNTY SCHOOLS 8400 E. Point Douglas Rd S., Cottage Grove, MN 55016 © 2024 BKBM Engineers Bakke Kopp Ballou & McFarlin, Inc. All rights reserved. This document is an instrument of service and is the property of BKBM Engineers and may not be used or copied without prior written consent. BKBM Project No. 24259.50 6120 Earle Brown Drive Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55430 Phone: 763.843.0420 bkbm.com CITY RESUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 475 Cleveland Ave. N, Suite 101A St. Paul, MN 55104 Phone: 651.788.9018 calyxdesigngroup.com TREE PRESERVATION EXHIBIT & EXISTING CONDITIONS L0.000 2020 DEAD TREE TO BE REPLACED EXISTING STUMPS EXISTING TREE TO REMOVED 2020 TREE TO BE MOVED / SPADED 2020 TREE TO REMAIN (INSIGNIFICANT) EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN EXISTING TREES NOT ON PRIOR SURVEY RELOCATED / SPADED TREE LOCATION TREE INVENTORY AND MITIGATION LEGEND 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 2020 DEAD TREES TO BE REPLACED A1. 2" Acer x freemanii 'Sienna', Sienna Glen Maple | Replace 1:1 A2. 4" Acer x freemanii 'Sienna', Sienna Glen Maple| Replace 1:1 A3. 4" Picea glauca 'Densata', Black Hills Spruce | Replace 1:1 B1. 3" Quercus rubra, Northern Red Oak B2. 4" Quercus rubra, Northern Red Oak B3. 4" Quercus rubra, Northern Red Oak B4. 4" Picea glauca 'Densata', Black Hills Spruce B5. 3" Quercus rubra, Northern Red Oak RELOCATED / SPADED TREES C1. 13" Maple | Caliper inches to count towards credit C2. 18" Siberian Elm | Caliper inches to not count towards credit | To be removed at no additional penalty. C3. 22" Siberian Elm | Caliper inches to not count towards credit EXISTING TREES NOT ON PRIOR SURVEY Landscape Symbols Legend: Note: 3 trees that were planted during the site work of 2020 were found to be dead. Said trees will be replaced 1:1 to bring the site work of 2020 up to code. Proposed Building Existing Building General Landscape Notes 1.Refer to Sheets L1.001 - L1.002 for Landscape Plans. Refer to Sheet L1.003-L1.004 for Landscape Notes, Details, & Schedules. 2.Refer to Sheet L1.005 for Fencing Enlargement, Details, and Notes. 3.Refer to Sheet L.0.000 for Existing Tree Conditions / Exhibit. Refer to Sheets L1.000 & L1.006 for Tree Preservation and Mitigation. 4.Refer to Civil Engineer's plans for site plan layout, dimensions, grading, drainage and concrete specifications. 5.Contractor to Coordinate all work with Owner. 6.Protect adjacent areas from damage during construction. 7.See written specifications for additional requirements. 8.Place topsoil or slope dressing on all areas disturbed by construction, including right-of-way boulevards, unless specified otherwise. See specifications. 9.All fine grading of turf areas shall be the responsibility of the sod sub-contractor(s), including sub-cut work. Field verify disturbance upon mobilization - actual sod areas may differ from anticipated limits shown on plan. 10.Existing Significant Trees Removed: 14 New Replacement Trees Proposed: 14 2020 Trees Removed: 3 2020 Replacement Trees Proposed: 3 Note: Silver Maple to be considered significant, whereas the Siberian Elms considered insignificant. Refer to Civil 'Existing Conditions & Removals' Plan for Tree Removals. Unless otherwise noted on civil plans, grind stumps to a minimum of 24" below grade. Remove root debris and backfill hole with imported topsoil. NOTE: PRE L I M I N A R Y TREE PROTECTION FENCE PER DETAIL EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED ADDITION PROPOSED ADDITION PROPOSED ADDITION HA D L E Y A V E N U E S ( F O R M E R L Y C H E R R Y A V E ) EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) EXISTING BASIN WORK LIMITS LINE WORK LIM I T S L I N E WORK LIMITS LINE EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN (TYP.) EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN (TYP.) EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN (TYP.) UTILITY EASEMENT UTILITY EASEMENT UTILITY EASEMENT TREE PROTECTION FENCE PER DETAIL PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PR O P E R T Y L I N E PR O P E R T Y L I N E PR O P E R T Y L I N E PR O P E R T Y L I N E PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN (TYP.) TREE PRESERVATION PLAN: License Number:Date 09/08/2025 Benjamin D. Hartberg 48084 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of MN DESIGN GROUP Landscape Architecture | Planning F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: BH AL 09/08/2025 242224 Revisions Description Date Num Pine Hill Elementary School Addition and Renovation 9015 HADLEY AVE S, COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 ISD #833: SOUTH WASHINGTON COUNTY SCHOOLS 8400 E. Point Douglas Rd S., Cottage Grove, MN 55016 © 2024 BKBM Engineers Bakke Kopp Ballou & McFarlin, Inc. All rights reserved. This document is an instrument of service and is the property of BKBM Engineers and may not be used or copied without prior written consent. BKBM Project No. 24259.50 6120 Earle Brown Drive Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55430 Phone: 763.843.0420 bkbm.com CITY RESUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 475 Cleveland Ave. N, Suite 101A St. Paul, MN 55104 Phone: 651.788.9018 calyxdesigngroup.com TREE PRESERVATION PLAN L1.000 1 L1.0 TYPICAL TREE PROTECTION DETAIL NOT TO SCALE DRIP LINE NOTE: TREE PROTECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR AS REQUIRED TO AIDE IN SURVIVABILITY OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. DO NOT STORE MATERIALS OR DRIVE EQUIPMENT WITHIN THE TREE DRIP LINE AS DESIGNATED ABOVE. MAINTAIN THE FENCE INTEGRITY AT ALL TIMES THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. TREE PROTECTION FENCE SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO THE START OF DEMOLITION. PLANELEVATION 4' SNOW FENCE WITH POSTS @ 8' O.C. (MAX.) AT EDGE OF CRITICAL ROOT ZONE (A RADIUS OF 1-1/2 FEET FOR EVERY 1 INCH OF DBH FOR THE TREE TRUNK OF THE TREE BEING PRESERVED. REFER TO PLAN FOR LOCATION. TREE NOTED TO REMAIN Existing Tree To Remain Proposed Building Landscape Legend: Existing Tree To Be Removed Tree Protection Fencing Refer to Civil 'Existing Conditions & Removals' Plan for Tree Removals. Unless otherwise noted on civil plans, grind stumps to a minimum of 24" below grade. Remove root debris and backfill hole with imported topsoil. NOTE: General Landscape Notes 1.Refer to Sheets L1.001 - L1.002 for Landscape Plans. Refer to Sheet L1.003-L1.004 for Landscape Notes, Details, & Schedules. 2.Refer to Sheet L1.005 for Fencing Enlargement, Details, and Notes. 3.Refer to Sheet L.0.000 for Existing Tree Conditions / Exhibit. Refer to Sheets L1.000 & L1.006 for Tree Preservation and Mitigation. 4.Refer to Civil Engineer's plans for site plan layout, dimensions, grading, drainage and concrete specifications. 5.Contractor to Coordinate all work with Owner. 6.Protect adjacent areas from damage during construction. 7.See written specifications for additional requirements. 8.Place topsoil or slope dressing on all areas disturbed by construction, including right-of-way boulevards, unless specified otherwise. See specifications. 9.All fine grading of turf areas shall be the responsibility of the sod sub-contractor(s), including sub-cut work. Field verify disturbance upon mobilization - actual sod areas may differ from anticipated limits shown on plan. 10.Existing Significant Trees Removed: 14 New Replacement Trees Proposed: 14 2020 Trees Removed: 3 2020 Replacement Trees Proposed: 3 PRE L I M I N A R Y EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED ADDITION R2 R1 M05 M06 M07 M08 M09 M10 WORK LIMITS LINE WORK LIMITS LINE M11 M12 M13 M14 PR O P E R T Y L I N E PR O P E R T Y L I N E PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE 1 AS 2 CO 4 Pp2 2 BR 2 GD 1 AS LIVE PLUGS PER SPECIFICATIONS TURF SOD TO BUILDING FOUNDATION NATIVE SEED PER SPECIFICATIONS TURF SOD TURF SOD TURF SOD TURF SOD LANDSCAPE EDGER (TYP.) WOOD MULCH PER SPEC. 2020 REPLACEMENT OVERSTORY TREE 2020 REPLACEMENT OVERSTORY TREE PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. SEE CIVIL PLANS. PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. SEE CIVIL PLANS. TURF SOD ROCK MULCH TYPE 'B' PER SPECIFICATIONS OVER 5OZ FREE DRAINING GEOTEXTILE FABRIC. SEE SPECIFICATIONS. ACCESS DOOR FROM INTERIOR HALLWAY TURF SOD TO BUILDING FOUNDATION LANDSCAPE PLAN - NORTH: License Number:Date 09/08/2025 Benjamin D. Hartberg 48084 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of MN DESIGN GROUP Landscape Architecture | Planning F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: BH AL 09/08/2025 242224 Revisions Description Date Num Pine Hill Elementary School Addition and Renovation 9015 HADLEY AVE S, COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 ISD #833: SOUTH WASHINGTON COUNTY SCHOOLS 8400 E. Point Douglas Rd S., Cottage Grove, MN 55016 © 2024 BKBM Engineers Bakke Kopp Ballou & McFarlin, Inc. All rights reserved. This document is an instrument of service and is the property of BKBM Engineers and may not be used or copied without prior written consent. BKBM Project No. 24259.50 6120 Earle Brown Drive Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55430 Phone: 763.843.0420 bkbm.com CITY RESUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 475 Cleveland Ave. N, Suite 101A St. Paul, MN 55104 Phone: 651.788.9018 calyxdesigngroup.com LANDSCAPE PLAN NORTH L1.001 Landscape Symbols Legend: Existing Deciduous Tree Turf Sod Per Specifications Live Plugs Per Specifications Native Seed Per Specifications Landscape Edger Per Specifications Rock Mulch Type 'B' Per Specifications Proposed Building Existing Building R1. 2.5" Acer x freemanii 'Sienna', Sienna Glen Maple R2. 2.5" Acer x freemanii 'Sienna', Sienna Glen Maple R3. 6' Picea glauca 'Densata', Black Hills Spruce REPLACEMENT TREES PER 2020 PLAN | TOTAL: 3 M01. 6' H Pinus alba, White Pine M02. 6' H Pinus alba, White Pine M03. 6' H Pinus alba, White Pine M04. 6' H Pinus alba, White Pine M05. 6' H Pinus ponderosa, Ponderosa Pine M06. 6' H Pinus ponderosa, Ponderosa Pine M07. 6' H Pinus ponderosa, Ponderosa Pine M08. 6' H Pinus ponderosa, Ponderosa Pine M09. 2.5" Caliper, Celtis occidentalis, Common Hackberry M10. 2.5" Caliper, Celtis occidentalis, Common Hackberry M11. 10' H Betula nigra, River Birch M12. 10' H Betula nigra, River Birch M13. 2.5" Caliper, Gymnocladus dioica 'Espresso', Kentucky Coffeetree M14. 2.5" Caliper, Gymnocladus dioica 'Espresso', Kentucky Coffeetree PROPOSED MITIGATION TREES PER BUILDING ADDITIONS SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER QTY EVERGREEN TREES Ab Abies balsamea Balsam Fir 6` Hgt.B&B 4 Pd Picea glauca `Densata`Black Hills Spruce 6` Hgt.B&B 3 Pw Pinus alba White Pine 6` Hgt.B&B 4 Pp2 Pinus ponderosa Ponderosa Pine 6` Hgt.B&B 4 OVERSTORY TREE AS Acer x freemanii `Sienna`Sienna Glen Maple 2.5" Cal.B&B 2 AO Aesculus glabra Ohio Buckeye 2.5" Cal.B&B 3 BR Betula nigra River Birch 10` Ht.B&B 2 BJ2 Betula platyphylla 'Jefpark'Parkland Pillar® Asian White Birch 2.5" Cal.B&B 3 CO Celtis occidentalis Common Hackberry 2.5" Cal.B&B 2 GD2 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis 'Draves' TM Street Keeper Honey Locust 2.5" Cal.B&B 2 GD Gymnocladus dioica `Espresso`Kentucky Coffeetree 2.5" Cal.B&B 2 PLANT SCHEDULE Landscape Requirements: OPEN SPACE AREA = 57,196 Square Feet REQUIRED DECIDUOUS TREES: 16 PROPOSED DECIDUOUS TREES: 16 REQUIRED CONIFEROUS TREES: 15 PROPOSED CONIFEROUS TREES: 15 REQUIRED SHRUBS: 34 PROPOSED SHRUBS: 34 Refer to Civil 'Existing Conditions & Removals' Plan for Tree Removals. Unless otherwise noted on civil plans, grind stumps to a minimum of 24" below grade. Remove root debris and backfill hole with imported topsoil. NOTE: General Landscape Notes 1.Refer to Sheets L1.001 - L1.002 for Landscape Plans. Refer to Sheet L1.003-L1.004 for Landscape Notes, Details, & Schedules. 2.Refer to Sheet L1.005 for Fencing Enlargement, Details, and Notes. 3.Refer to Sheet L.0.000 for Existing Tree Conditions / Exhibit. Refer to Sheets L1.000 & L1.006 for Tree Preservation and Mitigation. 4.Refer to Civil Engineer's plans for site plan layout, dimensions, grading, drainage and concrete specifications. 5.Contractor to Coordinate all work with Owner. 6.Protect adjacent areas from damage during construction. 7.See written specifications for additional requirements. 8.Place topsoil or slope dressing on all areas disturbed by construction, including right-of-way boulevards, unless specified otherwise. See specifications. 9.All fine grading of turf areas shall be the responsibility of the sod sub-contractor(s), including sub-cut work. Field verify disturbance upon mobilization - actual sod areas may differ from anticipated limits shown on plan. 10.Existing Significant Trees Removed: 14 New Replacement Trees Proposed: 14 2020 Trees Removed: 3 2020 Replacement Trees Proposed: 3 PRE L I M I N A R Y EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED ADDITION PROPOSED ADDITION CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE AND STOCKPILE STONES. CAREFULLY REMOVE BOULDERS (APPROXIMATELY 20) FIELD VERIFY LOCATIONS OF TO ENSURE NONE ARE BROKEN. B1 B3 B4 B2 B5 R2 R3 M01 M02 M03 M04 EXISTING BASIN WORK LIM I T S L I N E UTILITY EASEMENT UTILITY EASEMENT UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED REPLACEMENT GATE HOLDBACK POST. SEE DETAIL AND SPEC. 8' FENCE. SEE DETAIL AND ENLARGEMENT. 22' DOUBLE SWING GATE. SEE DETAIL AND ENLARGEMENT. 8' FENCE. SEE DETAIL AND ENLARGEMENT. 8' DOUBLE SWING GATE. SEE DETAIL AND ENLARGEMENT. PR O P E R T Y L I N E PR O P E R T Y L I N E 2 Pd 4 Ab 1 Pd 4 Pw 7 Nw 6 Ck 8 Pl 6 Pl 4 Nw 3 Ck 1 AS TURF SOD TO DISTURBED AREA. FIELD VERIFY. PAVING PER CIVIL PAVING PER CIVIL LANDSCAPE EDGER (TYP.) LANDSCAPE EDGER (TYP.) WOOD MULCH PER SPEC. 2020 REPLACEMENT OVERSTORY TREE 2020 REPLACEMENT CONIFEROUS TREE EXISTING MASONRY WALLS TURF SOD TURF SOD TO PAVEMENT EDGE 15' DOUBLE SWING GATE. SEE DETAIL AND ENLARGEMENT. RELOCATED TREE LOCATION. SEE NOTES AND SCHEDULE. MINIMIZE DAMAGE TO SOD DURING SPADING. STABILIZE TREES AFTER PANTING. ROCK MULCH TYPE 'A' PER SPEC. (TYP.) RELOCATE BOULDERS PER PLAN. 3 BJ2 2 AO 3 GD2 License Number:Date 09/08/2025 Benjamin D. Hartberg 48084 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of MN DESIGN GROUP Landscape Architecture | Planning F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: BH AL 09/08/2025 242224 Revisions Description Date Num Pine Hill Elementary School Addition and Renovation 9015 HADLEY AVE S, COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 ISD #833: SOUTH WASHINGTON COUNTY SCHOOLS 8400 E. Point Douglas Rd S., Cottage Grove, MN 55016 © 2024 BKBM Engineers Bakke Kopp Ballou & McFarlin, Inc. All rights reserved. This document is an instrument of service and is the property of BKBM Engineers and may not be used or copied without prior written consent. BKBM Project No. 24259.50 6120 Earle Brown Drive Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55430 Phone: 763.843.0420 bkbm.com CITY RESUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 475 Cleveland Ave. N, Suite 101A St. Paul, MN 55104 Phone: 651.788.9018 calyxdesigngroup.com LANDSCAPE PLAN SOUTH L1.002LANDSCAPE PLAN - SOUTH: Landscape Symbols Legend: Existing Deciduous Tree Turf Sod Per Specifications Live Plugs Per Specifications Native Seed Per Specifications Landscape Edger Per Specifications Rock Mulch Type 'A' Per Specifications Proposed Building Existing Building SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER QTY ANNUALS/PERENNIALS Nw Nepeta x faassenii `Walkers Low`Walkers Low Catmint 1 gal.Pot 11 Pl Perovskia atriplicifolia `Little Spire`Little Spire Russian Sage 1 gal.Pot 14 GRASSES Ck Calamagrostis x acutiflora `Karl Foerster`Feather Reed Grass 1 gal.Pot 9 PLANT SCHEDULE Refer to Civil 'Existing Conditions & Removals' Plan for Tree Removals. Unless otherwise noted on civil plans, grind stumps to a minimum of 24" below grade. Remove root debris and backfill hole with imported topsoil. NOTE: General Landscape Notes 1.Refer to Sheets L1.001 - L1.002 for Landscape Plans. Refer to Sheet L1.003-L1.004 for Landscape Notes, Details, & Schedules. 2.Refer to Sheet L1.005 for Fencing Enlargement, Details, and Notes. 3.Refer to Sheet L.0.000 for Existing Tree Conditions / Exhibit. Refer to Sheets L1.000 & L1.006 for Tree Preservation and Mitigation. 4.Refer to Civil Engineer's plans for site plan layout, dimensions, grading, drainage and concrete specifications. 5.Contractor to Coordinate all work with Owner. 6.Protect adjacent areas from damage during construction. 7.See written specifications for additional requirements. 8.Place topsoil or slope dressing on all areas disturbed by construction, including right-of-way boulevards, unless specified otherwise. See specifications. 9.All fine grading of turf areas shall be the responsibility of the sod sub-contractor(s), including sub-cut work. Field verify disturbance upon mobilization - actual sod areas may differ from anticipated limits shown on plan. 10.Existing Significant Trees Removed: 14 New Replacement Trees Proposed: 14 2020 Trees Removed: 3 2020 Replacement Trees Proposed: 3 Landscape Requirements: OPEN SPACE AREA = 57,196 Square Feet REQUIRED DECIDUOUS TREES: 16 PROPOSED DECIDUOUS TREES: 16 REQUIRED CONIFEROUS TREES: 15 PROPOSED CONIFEROUS TREES: 15 REQUIRED SHRUBS: 34 PROPOSED SHRUBS: 34 PRE L I M I N A R Y License Number:Date 09/08/2025 Benjamin D. Hartberg 48084 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of MN DESIGN GROUP Landscape Architecture | Planning F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: BH AL 09/08/2025 242224 Revisions Description Date Num Pine Hill Elementary School Addition and Renovation 9015 HADLEY AVE S, COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 ISD #833: SOUTH WASHINGTON COUNTY SCHOOLS 8400 E. Point Douglas Rd S., Cottage Grove, MN 55016 © 2024 BKBM Engineers Bakke Kopp Ballou & McFarlin, Inc. All rights reserved. This document is an instrument of service and is the property of BKBM Engineers and may not be used or copied without prior written consent. BKBM Project No. 24259.50 6120 Earle Brown Drive Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55430 Phone: 763.843.0420 bkbm.com CITY RESUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 475 Cleveland Ave. N, Suite 101A St. Paul, MN 55104 Phone: 651.788.9018 calyxdesigngroup.com LANDSCAPE NOTES AND SCHEDULES: LANDSCAPE NOTES AND SCHEDULES L1.003 Native Seed Areas noted per plan: (unless otherwise noted on civil plans), shall be: Shooting Star Native Seeds 'Dry Short Prairie Mix', drop seeded into the topsoil layer at 30.0 lbs per acre, plus 10.0 lbs per acre of additional Annual Oats (Avena sativa). Add an additional 1.0 lb per acre of Shooting Star Native Seeds 'Dry Forbs Enhancement Mix'. Submit seed mix for approval. See specifications. Grading and Erosion Control per Civil Plans and Specifications. NATIVE SEED MIX: NATIVE SEEDING INSTALLATION METHOD: Drop Seeding Onto Tilled Sites This is the "standard" method for seeding on prepared sites such as those on construction projects. a)Site Preparation: The site should be prepared by loosening topsoil to a minimum depth of 3 inches. b)Fertilizer: Use a fertilizer analysis based on a soil test or a general recommendation is a 10-10-10 (NPK) commercial grade analysis at 200 lbs/acre. c)Seed Installation: Seed should be installed with a drop seeder that will accurately meter the types of seed to be planted, keep all seeds uniformly mixed during the seeding and contain drop seed tubes for seed placement (Brillion-type). The drop seeder should be equipped with a cultipacker assembly to ensure seed-to-soil contact. d)Seeding Rates: Rates are specified in the mixture tabulation for the specified mix. e)Packing: If the drop seeder is not equipped with a cultipacker, the site should be cultipacked following the seeding to ensure seed-to-soil contact. f)Mulch: Cover soil with a hydromulch consisting of natural wood fiber or paper fiber, water, and M-Binder at 100 lbs per acre. Note: Heavy equipment is not allowed in the infiltration basins to keep soils from getting compacted. If any compaction occurs due to seeding operations, the soils must be uncompacted. NATIVE SEED REQUIRED MAINTENANCE - 3 YRS: Native Grass and Forb Mixtures (mixtures beginning with the number 3) Year 1 Establishment (spring seeding): 1)Prepare site - Late April - May 2)Seed - May 1 - June 1 Maintenance: 1)Mow (6-8 inches) - every 30 days after planting until September 30. 2)Weed Control - mowing should help control annual weeds. Spot spray thistles, etc. Establishment (fall seeding): 1)Prepare site - Late August - early September 2)Seed - late September to freeze-up Maintenance (following season): 1)Mow (6-8 inches) - once in May, June, and July 2)Weed Control - mowing should keep annual weeds down. Spot spray thistles, etc. Evaluation: 1)Cover crop growing within 2 weeks of planting (except dormant plantings). 2)Seedlings spaced 1-6 inches apart in drill rows. 3)Native grass seedlings may only be 4-6 inches tall. 4)If there is a flush of growth from foxtail etc., mow as necessary. Year 2 Maintenance: 1)Mow (6-8 inches) one time between June 1 - August 15 before weeds set seed. 2)Weed Control - mowing should keep annual weeds down. Spot spray thistles, etc. 3)Some sites may not require much maintenance the second year. Evaluation: 1)Cover crop will be gone unless winter wheat was used in a fall planting. 2)Grasses forming clumps 1-6 inches apart in drill rows, but still short. 3)Some flowers should be blooming (black-eyed Susans, bergamot, etc.). 4)If there is a flush of growth from foxtail etc., mow site. Year 3 Maintenance: 1)Mow only if necessary. 2)Weed Control - Spot spray thistles, etc. 3)Sites usually do not require much maintenance the third year. Evaluation: 1)Planting should begin looking like a prairie - tall grasses, flowers, etc. Long-term Maintenance: 1)Weed Control - Spot spray thistles, etc. 2)Burning (3-5 year rotation) alternate spring and fall if possible. 3)Haying (3-5 year rotation) late summer or early fall. Alternate with burning (may substitute for burning). 4)Burning two years in a row will really "clean up" rough-looking sites. PLUGFLATRiver BullrushBolboschoenus fluviatius RootSizeCommon NameScientific Name (Provide a random and equal mixture of the plants listed) PLUGFLAT Tussock SedgeCarex stricta PLUGFLATWooley SedgeCarex pellita PLUGFLATBebb's SedgeCarex bebbi PLUGFLAT Blue Joint GrassCalamagrostis canadensis PLUGFLATBottle Brush SedgeCarex comosa PLUGFLATLake SedgeCarex lacustris PLUGFLAT Fox SedgeCarex vulpinoidea PLUGFLATCommon RushJuncus effusus PLUGFLATGreen BulrushScirpus atrovirens PLUGFLAT Cord GrassSpartina pectinata PLUGFLAT WoolgrassScirpus cyperinus 24" On-Center Plug Spacing: *Contractor is to evenly distribute the allocated amount of prairie plugs throughout the basin areas located within the site accordingly. BASIN BOTTOM: LIVE PLUG SCHEDULE: 1. Tree saucer for individual trees outside of a plant bed to be four inches (4") depth Western Red Cedar wood mulch. Install per tree planting detail. Do not place mulch against tree trunk. Remove wire and burlap from top third of root ball before final soil back-fill and mulch. Dyed or Colorized mulch is strictly prohibited. 2. Refer to civil plan sheets for grading, drainage, site dimensions, survey, tree removal, proposed utilities & erosion control. 3. All plant material shall comply with the latest edition of the American Standard for Nursery Stock, American Association of Nurserymen. Unless noted otherwise, deciduous shrubs shall have at least 5 canes at the specified shrub height. Plant material shall be delivered as specified. 4. Plan takes precedence over plant schedule if discrepancies in quantities exist. 5. All proposed plants shall be located and staked as shown. Install 6" diameter perforated white PVC trunk guards on all new deciduous trees by November 1st. Remove tree watering bags at this time. 6. Adjustment in location of proposed plant material may be needed in field. Should an adjustment be required, the client will provide field approval. Significant changes may require city review and approval. 7. The project landscape contractor shall be held responsible for watering and properly handling all plant materials brought on the site both before and after installation. Schedule plant deliveries to coincide with expected installation time within 36 hours. 8. All plant materials shall be fertilized upon installation as specified. 9. The landscape contractor shall provide the owner with a watering schedule appropriate to the project site conditions and to plant material growth requirements. 10. If the landscape contractor is concerned or perceives any deficiencies in the plant selections, soil conditions, drainage or any other site condition that might negatively affect plant establishment, survival or guarantee, they must bring these deficiencies to the attention of the landscape architect & client prior to bid submission. Plant bed drainage concerns during plant installation shall be brought to the attention of the Owner and General Contractor immediately. 11. Contractor shall establish to his/ her satisfaction that soil and compaction conditions are adequate to allow for proper drainage at and around the building site. 12. Contractor is responsible for ongoing maintenance of all newly installed material, per specifications. Any acts of vandalism or damage which may occur prior to owner acceptance shall be the responsibility of the contractor. Contractor shall provide the owner with a maintenance program including, but not limited to, pruning, fertilization and disease/pest control. 13. Warranty: The contractor shall guarantee newly planted material through one calendar year from the date of punch list inspection. Plants that exhibit more than 30% die-back damage shall be replaced at no additional cost to the owner. The contractor shall also provide 6" dia. PVC trunk guards on deciduous trees. Prune dead wood prior to the warranty review meeting. 14. This layout plan constitutes our understanding of the landscape requirements listed in the ordinance. Changes and modifications may be requested by the city based on applicant information, public input, council decisions, etc. 15. The landscape contractor shall be responsible for obtaining any permits and coordinating inspections as required throughout the work process. 16. Plant size & species substitutions must be approved in writing prior to acceptance in the field. 17. Irrigation & Watering: The landscape contractor shall provide temporary irrigation. Refer to the Turf and Grasses Specification Section 32 92 00 for temporary irrigation requirements. Additionally, all trees planted outside of the irrigation coverage area shall receive tree watering bags. Tree watering bags to be installed and filled with water by the Contractor. Refer to spec section 32 93 00 for more information. 18. Landscape Edging: 5.5" Black Professional Grade Polyethylene Edging. See Specifications. 19. Landscape Contractor is responsible for coordination with the General Contractor, to protect the new improvements on and off-site during landscape work activities. Report any damage to the General Contractor immediately. 20. Unless otherwise noted/indicated, all new landscape beds to receive Rock Mulch Type 'A': 3/8" trap rock chips over weed mat per specifications. As indicated on plan, areas to receive Rock Mulch Type 'B' shall be 1-1/2" river rock over 5oz. free-draining geotextile fabric. 21. All planting, seeding, and sodded areas shall be prepared prior to installation activities with a harley power box rake or equal to provide a firm planting bed free of stones, sticks, construction debris, etc. 22. Turf Sodding and Seeding activity shall conform to all rules and regulations as established in the MnDOT Seeding Manual, 2024 edition, for turf bed preparation, installation, maintenance, acceptability, and warranty. An acceptable stand of seeded turf is lush, full, and weed-free. See specifications for maintenance requirements. 23. The Landscape Contractor shall furnish samples of all landscape materials for approval prior to installation. 24. The Landscape Contractor shall clear and grub the underbrush from within the work limits to remove dead branches, leaves, trash, weeds and foreign materials. 25. The landscape contractor shall contact Gopher State One Call no less than 48 hours before digging for field utility locations. 26. The landscape contractor shall be responsible for the removal of erosion control measures once vegetation has been established to the satisfaction of the municipal staff. This includes silt curtain fencing and sediment logs placed in the landscape. 27. The landscape contractor shall be responsible for visiting the site to become familiar with the conditions prior to bidding and installation. Coordinate with the general contractors on matters such as fine grading, landscaped area conditions, staging areas, irrigation connection to building, etc. 28. See Site and Civil plans for additional information regarding the project, including infiltration area soils and sub-surface drainage requirements and performance. 29. Topsoil Requirements: 4" (minimum) depth of topsoil is required on all projects. See Specifications for additional requirements. Specifications supersede this note if a deeper topsoil depth is listed. 30. Landscape contractor must prove the open sub-grade of all planting areas after their excavation is capable of infiltrating a minimum requirement of 1/4-inch of water per hour prior to installation of plant materials, topsoil, irrigation, weed mat, and mulch. Planting areas not capable of meeting this requirement shall have 4" diameter X 48" depth holes augured every 36" on-center and filled with MnDOT Free-Draining Coarse Filter Aggregate. Re-test sub-grade percolation for compliance to infiltration minimum requirement. 31. Landscape contractor to provide nursery pull list (bill of lading) including plant species and sizes shipped to the site. Additionally, the landscape contractor shall provide nursery stock traceability, proving none of the materials provided contain or are genetic strains of the neonicotinoid family including acetamiprid, clothianidin, imidacloprid, nitenpyram, nithiazine, thiacloprid and thiamethoxam. 32. Relocated (Spaded Trees): Landscape contractor is responsible for machine moving the 5 trees as shown on plan to their new location(s). Once trees are placed in their new location(s), they are to be mulched-in and given two (2) tree watering bags. There shall be a one year warranty for all transplanted trees. Timing of this work shall be such that the trees are transplanted at the same time as the erosion fence is installed, at the very beginning of the project. Landscape Notes and Requirements: PRE L I M I N A R Y License Number:Date 09/08/2025 Benjamin D. Hartberg 48084 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of MN DESIGN GROUP Landscape Architecture | Planning F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: BH AL 09/08/2025 242224 Revisions Description Date Num Pine Hill Elementary School Addition and Renovation 9015 HADLEY AVE S, COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 ISD #833: SOUTH WASHINGTON COUNTY SCHOOLS 8400 E. Point Douglas Rd S., Cottage Grove, MN 55016 © 2024 BKBM Engineers Bakke Kopp Ballou & McFarlin, Inc. All rights reserved. This document is an instrument of service and is the property of BKBM Engineers and may not be used or copied without prior written consent. BKBM Project No. 24259.50 6120 Earle Brown Drive Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55430 Phone: 763.843.0420 bkbm.com CITY RESUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 475 Cleveland Ave. N, Suite 101A St. Paul, MN 55104 Phone: 651.788.9018 calyxdesigngroup.com LANDSCAPE DETAILS: LANDSCAPE DETAILS L1.004 NOT TO SCALE DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE TYP. SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL . . . . . .. .. ....... . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . .. .. . ... . .. . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . ON CENTER SPACING AS STATED ON PLAN WIDTH OF HOLE EXCAVATION SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES BEYOND THE PLANTS ROOT SYSTEM. 3'' DEPTH WATERING BASIN PLANTING SOIL PER NOTES. MULCH PER NOTES FINISHED GRADE PLANT ACCORDING TO PLANTING DETAILS FOR ISOLATED PLANTING LOCATIONS WITH THE EXCEPTION OF REDUCED HOLE WIDTH. DO NOT HEAVILY PRUNE THE TREE AT PLANTING. PRUNE ONLY CROSSOVER LIMBS, CO-DOMINANT LEADERS, AND BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. SOME INTERIOR TWIGS AND LATERAL BRANCHES MAY BE PRUNED; HOWEVER, DO NOT REMOVE THE TERMINAL BUDS OF BRANCHES THAT EXTEND TO THE EDGE OF THE CROWN. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE TO KEEP TREE STRAIGHT AND PLUM. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 6" WHITE PVC TRUNK GUARD AT TIME OF PLANTING. MARK THE NORTH SIDE OF THE TREE IN THE NURSERY, AND ROTATE TREE TO FACE NORTH AT THE SITE WHEN EVER POSSIBLE. SET TOP OF ROOT BALL FLUSH TO GRADE OR 1-2 IN. HIGHER IN SLOWLY DRAINING SOILS. EACH TREE MUST BE PLANTED SUCH THAT THE TRUNK FLARE IS VISIBLE AT THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL. TREES WHERE THE TRUNK FLARE IS NOT VISIBLE SHALL BE REJECTED. DO NOT COVER THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL WITH SOIL. 4 IN. HIGH EARTH SAUCER BEYOND EDGE OF ROOT BALL (FOR ISOLATED TREES ONLY). REMOVE ALL TWINE, ROPE AND WIRE, AND BURLAP FROM TOP HALF OF ROOT BALL IF PLANT IS SHIPPED WITH A WIRE BASKET AROUND THE ROOT BALL, CUT THE WIRE BASKET OFF AND REMOVE. DISPOSE OFF OFF-SITE. PLACE ROOT BALL ON UNEXCAVATED OR TAMPED SOIL. ENSURE NOTE: FOR DIMENSIONS OF PLANTING AREAS SEE PLAN, SOIL BACKFILL SHALL BE GARDEN BLEND SOIL ( EQUAL MIX OF COMPOST, SAND & SOIL ) PER NOTES. TAMP SOIL AROUND ROOT BALL BASE FIRMLY WITH FOOT PRESSURE SO THAT ROOT BALL DOES NOT SHIFT. WOOD MULCH. DO NO PLACE MULCH IN CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK. MAINTAIN THE MULCH WEED-FREE FOR AFTER PLANTING. MULCH RING 4 FT. DIA. MINIMUM 6 FT. DIA. PREFERRED NOTES: TREE PLANTING REQUIREMENTS: -REMOVE ALL TWINE, ROPE, WIRE, AND BURLAP FROM THE TOP-HALF OF THE ROOT BALL AND DISPOSE OF OFF-SITE. -REMOVE THE WIRE BASKET DOWN TO THE SECOND HORIZONTAL WIRE FROM THE BOTTOM AND DISPOSE OF OFF-SITE. -EXPOSE ROOT FLARE AND SET AT GRADE NEW PLANT HOLES PASS THE REQUIRED INFILTRATION TEST. DOUBLE STAKE WITH POLYPROPYLENE WEBBING THROUGH THE EYE OF THE CINCH-TIE RUBBER SUPPORT. AVOID DAMAGE TO THE ROOT BALL WITH SUPPORT STAKES. NURSERY GRADE FIBERGLASS TREE STAKES, 11 16" X 6'-0" TOMAHAWK TREE STABILIZER STAKES. MINIMUM (2) PER TREE. SOD ROOT BALL TO SIT ON MOUNDED MULCH - 4" DEEP - SEE SPEC PLANTING SOIL - SEE SPEC. TOPSOIL SUBGRADE OTHERWISE. NO MULCH TO BE IN CONIFER TO HAVE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH UNLESS NOTED PLACE ROOT BALL SO THAT BASAL FLARE IS 1" ABOVE SURROUNDING CONTACT WITH TRUNK. NOTE: SUBGRADE, REMOVE BURLAP DRAIN SYSTEM IS NECESSARY 4" DIAMETER AUGERED HOLE, 42" MIN. DEPTH. FILLED W/ 3/4" DIAMETER DRAIN ROCK. COVER W/ 6" FILTER FABRIC. FOR HEAVY CLAY SOILS. FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT BALL GRADE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ENSURING THE TREES ARE IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE WARRANTY PERIOD. TR E E H E I G H T M E A S U R E D F R O M T O P O F R O O T B A L L T O B A S E O F C E N T R A L L E A D E R . NOT TO SCALE CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE TYP. PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL PERENNIAL / PLUG PLANT EDGE CONDITION VARIES - SEE PLAN. MULCH PER NOTES. PLANTING SOIL PER NOTES. CONTRACTOR PREPARED SUBGRADE NOTE: HAND-LOOSEN ROOTS OF CONTAINERIZED PLANT MATERIALS. 4 1 3 2 NOT TO SCALE TYPICAL MULCH & EDGER DETAIL 1'-6" (MIN.) 4" FACE OF WALL OR BACK OF CURB. MULCH PER LANDSCAPE NOTES EDGER PER LANDSCAPE NOTES 3 OZ. NEEDLE-PUNCH FILTER FABRIC, TURN-UP FINISHED GRADE PITCH SUB-GRADE TO DRAIN AWAY FROM BUILDING WALLS & CURBS. NOTES: SEE PLAN FOR CROSS SLOPE DIRECTION. PLANT BED WIDTH VARIES, SEE PLAN. AT EDGES, OVERLAP SEAMS 4". SEE PLANS WIDTHS MAY VARY SUBMIT MULCH, EDGER, AND FABRIC SAMPLES FOR APPROVAL. 5 EXISTING SOD BLADE EXISTING THATCH LAYER SOIL NEW SOD BLADE NEW THATCH LAYER SOIL SUB CUT FOR NEW SOD THATCH LAYERS TO HAVE MATCHING ELEVATION 1" 3/ 4 " 4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK * THATCH LAYERS TO MATCH * NO THATCH ABOVE ADJACENT GRADE * SUB-CUT AND FINAL GRADE BY SOD INSTALLER OR CURB NOT TO SCALE NEW SOD TO EXISTING SOD6 NOT TO SCALE PLANTING AND TRANSPLANTING (TREE SPADING)7 PRE L I M I N A R Y REFER TO NOTE 32 ON SHEET L1.003 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT PLANTING AND WARRANTY FOR SPADED TREES. 3' - 0 " ( M I N . ) 5' - 0 ' ' 8'' POST MOUNT 'DUCK BILL' GATE HOLDBACK FOR 2" SQ. GATE POST. INCLUDE THREADED 'U' BOLT AROUND POST. SET TO LATCH BOTTOM OR SIDE GATE RAIL. ADJUST IN FIELD. FURNISH AND INSTALL MANUALLY OPERATED 2" SQUARE POST. YELLOW FINISH. GATE HOLDBACK POST: YELLOW FINISH TO MATCH FENCE POST. POST CAP - YELLOW FINISH. PAVING PER CIVIL PLANS CENTER TRASH ENCLOSURE ON CONCRETE SLAB, REFER TO CIVIL PLANS FOR EXACT SLAB DIMENSIONS. NEW 8' SCREEN FENCE PER DETAIL 2/L1.005 17'-0" 9'-0" 22.00 8. 0 0 8. 0 0 8' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 3' - 0 " 15'-0" 3' - 0 " 6"6" DOUBLE SWING GATE (22'-0" CLEAR OPENING) WITH LOCKABLE COLLAR. SEE SPECIFICATIONS. NEW 8' SCREEN FENCE PER DETAIL 1/L1.005 PAVING PER CIVIL PLANS PAVING PER CIVIL PLANS EDGE OF CONCRETE SLAB EDGE OF CONCRETE SLAB UTILITY LOCATIONS CHILLER UNIT PER ARCHITECTURAL PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION EXISTING TRASH ENCLOSURE LOCATION EXISTING BUILDING EX I S T I N G M A S O N R Y W A L L T O R E M A I N EXISTING BUILDING GATE HOLDBACK POST. SEE DETAIL 3/L1.005. 4. 0 0 11.00 11.00 16 ' - 0 " 6" EXISTING MASONRY WALL TO REMAIN SECURE CONNECTION. SEE DETAIL 4/L1.005. 1.00 LOCATE TERMINAL POST WITHIN 6" OF THE FACE OF THE BUILDING SALVAGE AND REINSTALL 8'-0" ENTRANCE 8' - 0 " DOUBLE SWING GATE: (2) 7.5' SWING GATE PANELS, INCLUDE LOCKABLE HORIZONTAL SLIDE BOLT. INCLUDE TRUING CABLES AND ADJUSTABLE HINGES. NO CANE PIN PER OWNER REQUEST. NOTE: GATES SHALL HAVE MATCHING RAILS, POSTS, AND INFILL PANELS TO THE REST OF THE ENCLOSURE. DOUBLE SWING GATE: (2) 4' SWING GATE PANELS, INCLUDE LOCKABLE HORIZONTAL SLIDE BOLT. INCLUDE TRUING CABLES AND ADJUSTABLE HINGES. NO CANE PIN PER OWNER REQUEST. NOTE: GATES SHALL HAVE MATCHING RAILS, POSTS, AND INFILL PANELS TO THE REST OF THE ENCLOSURE. 6" LOCATE TERMINAL POST WITHIN 6" OF THE FACE OF THE BUILDING POST CAP NEW TERMINAL POST: SQUARE POST BAND, TYP. METAL BOTTOM RAIL PER DETAIL 2 NOTE: THE SURVEY DID NOT INCLUDE THE ACTUAL LOCATION OF THE EXISTING TRASH ENCLOSURE BOLLARD. IF THE BOLLARD LOCATION WITHIN THE FIELD DIFFERS FROM THE SHOWN LOCATION ON THE PLAN, THEN STRETCH FABRIC FROM THE TERMINAL CHILLER POST TO THE BOLLARD POST TO ENSURE NO GAP EXISTS BETWEEN THE TRASH ENCLOSURE AND THE CHILLER ENCLOSURE. VERIFY THAT THE DOUBLE SWING GATE REMAINS OPERATIONAL. +/- 12'-0" EXISTING TRASH ENCLOSURE BOLLARD TO REMAIN CONTRACTOR TO REQUEST 4 EXTRA 1" X 6" X 8' PLANKS FROM MANUFACTURER. USE PLANKS TO BUILD SCREEN PER DETAIL ON RIGHT. FIELD MEASURE AND FIELD INSTALL PANELS TO TOP AND BOTTOM RAILS TO FILL IN EXISTING GAP BETWEEN BOLLARD AND TERMINAL POST. EXTRA SCREEN FENCE MATERIAL TO MATCH ENCLOSURE MATERIAL. 4"X4" METAL POST (MIN.). POSTS TO MATCH PANEL SECTIONS. METAL TOP RAIL PER DETAIL 2 CIRCULAR POST BAND, TYP. MID RAIL CONNECTION POINT, TYP. NOTES: ATTACHMENT HARDWARE TO BE ZINC COATED OR STAINLESS. SUBMIT FENCE SHOP DRAWINGS FOR REVIEW. SUBMIT FENCE COLOR CHART FOR FINAL SELECTIONS. FENCE PERMIT COST TO BE INCLUDED IN BID. SEE LAYOUT PLAN FOR FENCE LOCATIONS. FENCE IS TO BE SURFACE MOUNTED DEPENDING ON FENCE. MANUFACTURER TO INFORM IF FOOTING IS NEEDED. TOP RAIL CONNECTION POINT, TYP. SURFACE MOUNT FOOTING PER DETAIL 2 PLANK MATERIAL TO MATCH ENCLOSURE ALUMINUM SCREEN FENCE. License Number:Date 09/08/2025 Benjamin D. Hartberg 48084 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of MN DESIGN GROUP Landscape Architecture | Planning F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: BH AL 09/08/2025 242224 Revisions Description Date Num Pine Hill Elementary School Addition and Renovation 9015 HADLEY AVE S, COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 ISD #833: SOUTH WASHINGTON COUNTY SCHOOLS 8400 E. Point Douglas Rd S., Cottage Grove, MN 55016 © 2024 BKBM Engineers Bakke Kopp Ballou & McFarlin, Inc. All rights reserved. This document is an instrument of service and is the property of BKBM Engineers and may not be used or copied without prior written consent. BKBM Project No. 24259.50 6120 Earle Brown Drive Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55430 Phone: 763.843.0420 bkbm.com CITY RESUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 475 Cleveland Ave. N, Suite 101A St. Paul, MN 55104 Phone: 651.788.9018 calyxdesigngroup.com FENCING ENLARGEMENT, DETAILS, AND NOTES: FENCING ENLARGEMENT, DETAILS, AND NOTES L1.005 NOT TO SCALE GATE HOLDBACK DETAIL3 NOT TO SCALE TRASH ENCLOSURE AND UTILITY ENCLOSURE ENLARGEMENT1 VERIFY EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE CONSTRUCTION.NOTE: NOT TO SCALE 8' ALUMINUM "LOUVERED SCREEN WALL" DETAIL2 NOT TO SCALE SECURE CONNECTION BETWEEN POSTS DETAIL4 3- 1 / 2 " 3-1/2" O.C. LENGTH VARIES SEE PLAN 4"X4" METAL POST (MIN.) WITH PYRAMID HIP FINIAL CAP AND ESCUTCHEON BASE PLATE COVER. POSTS TO MATCH PANEL SECTIONS. METAL TOP RAIL FINISHED GRADE - SEE CIVIL PLANS 8' NOTES: ATTACHMENT HARDWARE TO BE ZINC COATED OR STAINLESS. SUBMIT FENCE SHOP DRAWINGS FOR REVIEW. SUBMIT FENCE COLOR CHART FOR FINAL SELECTIONS. FENCE PERMIT COST TO BE INCLUDED IN BID. SEE LAYOUT PLAN FOR FENCE LOCATIONS. FENCE IS TO BE SURFACE MOUNTED DEPENDING ON FENCE. MANUFACTURER TO INFORM IF FOOTING IS NEEDED. REFER TO PLAN FOR GATES. SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR ALL GATES. FOR ALL DOUBLE SWING GATES, INCLUDE DROP PIN GATE LATCH AND SPRING LOADED, ADJUSTABLE SWIVEL GATE WHEELS. AI R G A P VA R I E S METAL BOTTOM RAIL ALUMINUM "LOUVERED SCREEN WALL" SCREEN FENCE. SEE SPECIFICATIONS. 5 8" x 9" HILTI ASSEMBLY BOLTS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION. EMBED INTO CONCRETE SLAB NO LESS THAN 7" OR PER MANUFACTURER'S GUIDELINES. EPOXY BOLTS INTO CONCRETE AND TIGHTEN TO MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 8" BAR REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB PER CIVIL PLANS AIR GAP BETWEEN BOTTOM RAIL AND FINISH GRADE VARIES PER LOCATION: TRASH ENCLOSURE: 4" AIR GAP MECHANICAL ENCLOSURE: 6" AIR GAP PRE L I M I N A R Y License Number:Date 09/08/2025 Benjamin D. Hartberg 48084 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT under the laws of the State of MN DESIGN GROUP Landscape Architecture | Planning F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: BH AL 09/08/2025 242224 Revisions Description Date Num Pine Hill Elementary School Addition and Renovation 9015 HADLEY AVE S, COTTAGE GROVE, MN 55016 ISD #833: SOUTH WASHINGTON COUNTY SCHOOLS 8400 E. Point Douglas Rd S., Cottage Grove, MN 55016 © 2024 BKBM Engineers Bakke Kopp Ballou & McFarlin, Inc. All rights reserved. This document is an instrument of service and is the property of BKBM Engineers and may not be used or copied without prior written consent. BKBM Project No. 24259.50 6120 Earle Brown Drive Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55430 Phone: 763.843.0420 bkbm.com CITY RESUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 475 Cleveland Ave. N, Suite 101A St. Paul, MN 55104 Phone: 651.788.9018 calyxdesigngroup.com TREE PRESERVATION NOTES AND SCHEDULE TREE PRESERVATION NOTES & SCHEDULE L1.006 Existing boundary, location, topographic, and utility information shown on this plan is from a field survey by others. ·Do not begin tree clearing work until tree protection measures are in place and to the permit approval of the City Forester has been granted. ·Critical Root Zone: Install high density polyethylene safety fence, 4 ft. high, international orange, at the Drip Line or at the Critical Root Zone whichever is greater, of trees to be preserved per detail, prior to commencement of earthwork activity. Field-staking of the fence location(s) subject to City approval. ·Where silt fence and proposed tree protection fence overlap, place the tree protection fence on the outside of the silt fence, double-staked at the break-point. ·Refer to Tree Protection Detail for fencing required around trees to remain. ·The contractor shall prune the canopy of existing trees to remain where the canopy is in jeopardy of damage due to the new improvements shown. It is recommended that the contractor hire a certified arborist to perform the pruning. Any branches broken during construction shall be immediately trimmed and wounds painted to prevent further damage. ·Perform work in accordance with the laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, and orders of public authority having jurisdiction. Secure and pay for permits, governmental fees and licenses necessary for the proper execution of the demolition work. ·Provide protective coverings and enclosures as necessary to prevent damage to existing work that is to remain. Existing work to remain may include items such as trees, shrubs, lawns, sidewalks, drives, curbs, utilities, buildings and/or other structures on or adjacent to the demolition site. Provide temporary fences and barricades as required for the safe and proper execution of the work and the protection of persons and property. ·Remove debris, waste, and rubbish promptly from the site. On-site burial of debris is not permitted. Burn no debris on the site. Salvage material not otherwise indicated to be reused shall become the Contractor's property and is to be removed promptly from the site and disposed of in strict accordance with all applicable laws, regulations, and/or statutes. ·Buildings, features, surfaces, and other descriptive references shown on this drawing are for informational purposes only. Field verify all information relevant to the project prior to proceeding with the work. Visit the site and determine all site conditions and hazards. ·This plan is a guide as to the anticipated amount of disturbance expected due to proposed improvements. The contractor is expected to take all necessary precautions to ensure trees noted to remain are not damaged during construction. Do not store material or drive within the drip line of existing trees to remain. Be aware of overhead branches for clearance of material and equipment. ·This plan is not a guarantee that existing trees will survive during/post construction, but rather a guide to help assure their protection and greatest chances of survival at the surface level. Further protection measures outside this scope could involve ecologists, foresters and arborists. ·Notify the Owner's Representative when tree protection fencing is taken down to perform work in conjunction with the new improvements noted in this plan set. The contractor is responsible for re-erecting the tree protection fence immediately after the work is complete, when ever possible ·Trees shown as existing to remain (be preserved) that are damaged / killed as a result of construction activities are subject to replacement per the City Tree Replacement penalty. Replacement trees are to be paid for at no additional expense to the Owner. Tree Preservation & Protection Notes: PRE L I M I N A R Y UGE B I T U M I N O U S UG T UG T 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 3 0 . 6 0 . 4 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 5 1 . 2 0 . 9 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 7 2 . 3 2 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 9 3 . 4 3 . 4 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 4 1 . 0 3 . 5 3 . 8 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 4 0 . 9 1. 4 2. 5 2 . 2 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 5 1. 7 2. 1 0. 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 6 2 . 7 3 . 1 0. 0 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 7 3 . 3 4 . 6 0. 1 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 8 2 . 7 2 . 8 0. 1 0 . 3 0 . 7 1 . 2 1 . 8 1. 7 0. 1 0 . 4 1 . 3 1 . 8 0. 1 0 . 4 2 . 1 3 . 1 0. 1 0 . 4 2 . 7 4 . 2 0. 1 0 . 4 2 . 5 3 . 5 0. 1 0 . 4 1 . 8 2 . 3 0. 1 0 . 3 1 . 0 1 . 2 0. 1 0 . 2 0 . 5 0 . 6 1 . 0 2 . 1 0. 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 4 1 . 3 3 . 6 0. 0 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 3 1 . 6 4 . 9 0. 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 3 1 . 8 4 . 8 0. 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 3 1 . 9 5 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 3 1 . 9 5 . 6 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 3 2 . 0 5 . 2 0. 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 3 2 . 0 5 . 0 0. 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 3 1 . 9 5 . 6 0. 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 3 1 . 9 5 . 2 0. 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 4 1 . 8 4 . 9 3 . 1 1 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 5 1. 7 5. 0 4 . 3 1 . 3 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 3 0 . 8 0 . 9 1. 4 4. 4 3. 7 1 . 3 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 5 1. 5 1. 6 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 5 2 . 4 3 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 5 3 . 1 4. 4 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 5 2 . 6 3 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 5 1. 7 1. 9 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 4 1 . 0 0 . 9 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 UGE WW1 WW1 WW1E WW1 WW1E WW1 WW1 WW1 WW1 670 County Road B West St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 Tel: (651) 771-0880 Email: kfi@kfi-eng.com F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 E MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: Scale: NOT F O R C O NSTRUC T IO N # KEY PLAN DATE:REG. NO.: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF PRINT NAME: 11 PEAVEY ROAD CHASKA, MN 55318 501 Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55404 krausanderson.com | 612 332 7281 7/ 1 8 / 2 0 2 5 1 1 : 2 8 : 5 6 A M Au t o d e s k D o c s : / / 2 4 2 2 2 4 - I S D 8 3 3 - P i n e H i l l E l e m e n ta r y S c h o o l A d d i t i o n a n d R e n o v a t i o n / E 2 4 _ S o W a s h C o P i ne H i l l s ES B o n d I m p r o v e m e n t s . r v t 1" = 20'-0" ISD #833 Pine Hill Elementary School Addition and Renovation E0.12 SITE PLAN - PHOTOMETRY 9015 Hadley Ave S, Cottage Grove, MN 55016 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS NNA MMR 07/18/2025 23-1594.00 CONST R U C T ION D O CUM ENT S 07/18/2025 MINNESOTA Elec EOR 11111 0 20'40'10'1" = 20'-0"E0.12 1 SITE PLAN - PHOTOMETRY LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE (EXTERIORS) TYPE DESCRIPTION CIRCUIT VOLTAGE MOUNTING LAMP LUMENS CRI COLOR TEMPERATURE CONNECTED (VA) BALLAST/DRIVER LENS/LOUVER MANUFACTURER CATALOG SERIES NOTES WW1 EXTERIOR WALL PACK, DIE-CAST ALUMINUM HOUSING, INTEGRAL HEAT SINK, SEALED, CORROSION AND WEATHERING RESISTANT, IP65 RATED 277 V EXTERIOR, SURFACE - WALL LED 5200 lm 80 4000 K 61 VA 0-10V DIMMING TYPE 2 DISTRIBUTION, ACRYLIC LENS LITHONIA, OR APPROVED EQUAL DSXW1-LED-P5-40K-80CRI-T2M-MVOLT-PIR-DDBXD WW1E EXTERIOR WALL PACK, DIE-CAST ALUMINUM HOUSING, INTEGRAL HEAT SINK, SEALED, CORROSION AND WEATHERING RESISTANT, IP65 RATED 277 V EXTERIOR, SURFACE - WALL LED 5200 lm 80 4000 K 61 VA 0-10V DIMMING TYPE 2 DISTRIBUTION, ACRYLIC LENS LITHONIA, OR APPROVED EQUAL DSXW1-LED-P5-40K-80CRI-T2M-MVOLT-PIR-DDBXD Revisions Description Date Num REPORT www.transportationcollaborative.com To: Kyle Uecker, Director of Facilities South Washington County School District From: Matt Pacyna, PE, Principal Date: July 17, 2025 Subject: Pine Hill Elementary School Expansion Traffic Study INTRODUCTION TC2 completed a traffic study for the proposed Pine Hill Elementary School expansion in the City of Cottage Grove. The subject site, shown in Figure 1, is generally southeast of the Hadley Avenue and 90th Street intersection. The main objectives of the study are to identify existing traffic operations within the study area, evaluate potential impacts of the proposed expansion, and recommend improvements, if necessary, to ensure safe and efficient operations for all users. The following study assumptions, methodology, and findings are offered for consideration. Figure 1 Subject Site 94th St 90th St 92nd St 95th St Subject Site Pine Hill Elementary School Expansion Traffic Study July 17, 2025 Page 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS Existing conditions were reviewed within the study area to establish current traffic conditions to help determine impacts associated with the proposed expansion. The evaluation of existing conditions included collecting traffic volumes, observing transportation characteristics, and analyzing crash history and intersection capacity, which are described in the following sections. Traffic Volumes Vehicular intersection turning movement and pedestrian / bicyclist counts were collected at the following locations on Tuesday, April 8, 2025. The data was collected from 7 to 9 a.m. and 2 to 6 p.m. Existing school hours of operation are generally from 8:40 a.m. to 3:10 p.m. • Hadley Avenue and 90th Street • Hadley Avenue and North School Access • Hadley Avenue and Central School Access • Hadley Avenue and South School Access • Hadley Avenue and 92nd Street • Hadley Avenue and 94th Street • Hadley Avenue and 95th Street The a.m., school p.m., and p.m. peak hours within the study area represent 7:45 to 8:45 a.m., 2:45 to 3:45 p.m., and 4:00 to 5:00 p.m., respectively. Average daily traffic (ADT) volumes were provided by MnDOT and / or estimated based on the data collected. Transportation Characteristics Observations were conducted within the study area to identify various transportation characteristics such as roadway geometry, traffic controls, speed limits, and multimodal facilities. A general overview of key roadways within the study area is as follows: • Hadley Avenue – a 2-lane undivided major collector with left turn lanes at most intersections south of 90th Street. There is a multi-use trail along both sides of the roadway south of 90th Street and no multimodal facilities to the north. The speed limit varies from 30-mph north of 92nd Street to 35-mph to the south; there is a 20-mph advisory school zone speed limit near Pine Hill Elementary School. • 90th Avenue – a 2-lane local roadway with no turn lanes. There are no multimodal facilities along the roadway and the speed limit is 30-mph. • 95th Avenue – a 2-lane local roadway to the west of Hadley Avenue and a major collector to the east. There is a multi-use trail along both sides of the roadway. The speed limit is 30-mph west of Hadley Avenue and 35-mph to the east. The Hadley Avenue / 90th Street intersection has all-way stop control, while the Hadley Avenue / 95th Street intersection is controlled by a single-lane roundabout. All other study intersections have side- street stop control. Note that during the a.m. and school p.m. peak periods, there is a crossing guard present at the Hadley Avenue / 90th Street intersection. Existing geometrics, traffic controls, and volumes within the study area are in Figure 2. Figure 2Existing Conditions Pine Hill Elementary School Expansion Traffic Study 12 [6] (4)5 [4] (2)51 [18] (15) 4 [7] (1)5 [3] (3)15 [4] (15) 47 [ 5 0 ] ( 1 9 ) 35 5 [ 2 8 4 ] ( 2 5 9 ) 9 [ 8 ] ( 1 3 ) 0 [ 8 ] ( 3 ) 15 2 [ 2 8 3 ] ( 2 9 5 ) 1 [ 5 ] ( 3 ) 4 [17] (3)3 [8] (2) 40 7 [ 3 2 5 ] ( 2 8 8 ) 13 [ 3 ] ( 0 ) 20 9 [ 3 0 1 ] ( 3 2 2 ) 9 [ 4 ] ( 3 ) 135 [82] (15)2 [2] (0) 28 5 [ 2 4 6 ] ( 2 7 3 ) 21 2 [ 3 0 9 ] ( 3 2 4 ) 2 [5] (2)61 [46] (13) 28 3 [ 2 4 1 ] ( 2 7 1 ) 12 3 [ 6 1 ] ( 9 ) 13 4 [ 2 9 4 ] ( 3 1 4 ) 80 [ 1 7 ] ( 1 0 ) 35 [17] (15)1 [0] (3)4 [8] (5) 33 [27] (24)1 [0] (0)1 [1] (2) 5 [ 9 ] ( 1 2 ) 33 8 [ 2 5 8 ] ( 2 4 1 ) 0 [ 4 ] ( 0 ) 13 [ 2 4 ] ( 1 8 ) 16 5 [ 2 7 1 ] ( 2 6 6 ) 17 [ 4 5 ] ( 4 3 ) 22 [15] (13)1 [2] (0)4 [10] (2) 20 [10] (7)0 [5] (1)1 [2] (4) 4 [ 8 ] ( 7 ) 30 1 [ 2 4 6 ] ( 2 3 3 ) 1 [ 9 ] ( 4 ) 4 [ 1 8 ] ( 1 0 ) 15 8 [ 2 5 0 ] ( 2 5 3 ) 8 [ 1 2 ] ( 1 0 ) 400 650 300350 850 550 6, 1 0 0 1,350 2,950 2, 9 5 0 5,5 0 0 39 [27] (10)25 [28] (38)4 [5] (1) 90 [91] (113)24 [33] (65)4 [12] (22) 0 [ 1 1 ] ( 4 ) 17 7 [ 1 4 5 ] ( 1 2 1 ) 16 [ 1 6 ] ( 1 9 ) 19 [ 2 2 ] ( 3 1 ) 74 [ 1 3 7 ] ( 1 3 5 ) 70 [ 1 0 3 ] ( 9 3 ) Had l e y A v e S 95th St S 94th St S 92nd St S 90th St S Legend AM Peak Hour VolumeSchool PM Peak Hour VolumePM Peak Hour VolumeEstimated ADT VolumeStop SignRoundabout XXX[XXX](XXX)X,XXX N Legend AM Peak Hour VolumeSchool PM Peak Hour VolumePM Peak Hour VolumeEstimated ADT VolumeStop SignRoundaboutPedestrian Volumes XXX[XXX](XXX)X,XXX X [X] (X) N 0 [8] (3) 17 [42] (0) 6 [ 1 9 ] ( 7 ) 1 [ 8 ] ( 1 ) 0 [0] (0) 0 [0] (0) 1 [ 2 ] ( 2 ) 0 [0] (0) 0 [0] (0) 1 [ 3 ] ( 7 ) 0 [0] (0) 0 [0] (0) 1 [ 5 ] ( 4 ) 10 [13] (0) 0 [2] (2) 4 [ 9 ] ( 1 4 ) 3 [ 1 5 ] ( 4 ) 1 [0] (0) 0 [2] (1) 4 [ 5 ] ( 5 ) 2 [ 1 7 ] ( 7 ) 0 [0] (0) 0 [11] (0) 3 [ 1 ] ( 3 ) 0 [ 0 ] ( 0 ) Pine Hill Elementary School Expansion Traffic Study July 17, 2025 Page 4 Crash History Five years of crash history within the study area (January 2020 through December 2024) was reviewed using data from MnDOT’s Crash Mapping Analysis Tool (MnCMAT). There was a total of 13 crashes reported along Hadley Avenue during the review period. Eight (8) of the 13 crashes occurred at the Hadley Avenue / 95th Street intersection, including one (1) “severe” crash (i.e., a serious injury) which was a medical issue and not associated with the intersection design / configuration. There were three (3) left-turn / angle crashes reported at the Hadley Avenue / South Pine Hill School Access during the morning school arrival period; two (2) occurred in 2022 and one (1) in 2024; no crashes resulted in any severe injuries at this location. A review of crash and severity rates indicates that these intersections operate within the normal range for intersections with similar characteristics; detailed results are shown in the Appendix. Thus, there does not appear to be any safety issues within the study area from a crash history perspective. Vehicle Speeds As part of the data collection, vehicle speed data was recorded along Hadley Avenue at two (2) locations between Monday, April 7, 2025 and Wednesday, April 9, 2025. One (1) location was between the central and south Pine Hill Elementary School driveways and one (1) location was between 92nd Street and 94th Street. The recorded vehicle speed data was summarized into average and 85th percentile speeds in each location, which is shown in Table 1. This information is provided for informational purposes only. Table 1 Existing Vehicle Speeds School Background / Observations Pine Hill Elementary School was originally built in the 1960’s, but has gone through several renovations including an update to the current site configuration in the summer of 2020. Minor adjustments to the South School Access were implemented in 2023 to allow for two (2) entering lanes and one (1) exiting lane. The purpose of this improvement was to improve pick-up / drop-off operations, which have been known to extend onto Hadley Avenue during the school p.m. peak period. In addition, school staff have implemented refined pick-up / drop-off guidance, which has improved overall pick-up / drop-off efficiency; the school continues to modify its guidance to minimize impacts to Hadley Avenue. School observations were conducted as part of this study to better understand current operations, as well to identify potential improvements for consideration. The following observations were identified, while potential considerations are noted later in this report. AM Peak Hour Observations: • Internal school queues / operations did not significantly impact the adjacent roadway network. • A crossing guard was at the Hadley Avenue / 90th Street intersection for about 30-minutes (i.e., 8:10 to 8:40 a.m.) to assist pedestrian / bicyclists through the intersection. Regardless of which intersection approach a pedestrian / bicyclist utilized, all motorists were stopped to allow for the crossings to occur, which resulted in longer northbound queues along Hadley Avenue. Hadley Avenue Location Speed Southbound Northbound Average 85th % Average 85th % Near Pine Hill Elementary School 30 mph 32 mph 37 mph 31 mph 35 mph 92nd Street to 94th Street 35 mph 37 mph 41 mph 36 mph 41 mph Pine Hill Elementary School Expansion Traffic Study July 17, 2025 Page 5 • Northbound queues along Hadley Avenue extended to the north School Access for about 15- minutes, the Central School Access for about five (5) minutes, and the South School Access for one (1) minute; these queues quickly dissipated once the pedestrian / bicyclist activity ended and school began. • No significant queues or operational issues were observed with either the southbound left-turn lane or the northbound right-turn lane at the South School Access; overall school operations were relatively slow and orderly. School PM Peak Hour Observations: • Pick-up / drop-off operations have historically resulted in queues regularly extending off-site and into the northbound right-turn lane along Hadley Avenue; these queues were observed extending into the northbound turn lane for about 10 minutes prior to school ending, but dissipate with approximately five (5) minutes following the end of school. • The queuing issues are a result of several factors, including: o Motorists begin to arrive about 30 minutes before school ends and get into the pick-up queue. o Once motorists are in the queue, they are directed to stay within the line until all vehicles in front of them complete their pick-up, which results in additional delays. o Motorists wanting to park and pick-up can get stuck in the pick-up line along Hadley Avenue, further increasing the queues even though the inside lane is currently designated for park and pick-up users. o Motorists do not regularly pull up to the far north end of the pick-up area, rather waiting near the primary school entrance, which reduces the number of pick-ups that can occur at a time. • No significant operational issues were observed with motorists exiting the school; overall school operations were relatively slow and orderly. • New procedures for pick-up and drop-off operations are in the planning stages for next year. Intersection Capacity Intersection capacity was evaluated using Synchro / SimTraffic Software (version 11), which uses methods outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition. The software is used to develop calibrated models that simulate observed traffic operations, account for peaking characteristics, and identify key metrics such as intersection Level of Service (LOS) and queues. These models incorporate collected traffic, pedestrian, and bicyclist volumes, traffic controls, heavy commercial vehicle activity (i.e., buses and trucks), and driver behavior factors. Level of Service (LOS) quantifies how an intersection is operating. Intersections are graded from LOS A to LOS F, which corresponds to the average delay per vehicle values shown. An overall intersection LOS A though LOS D is generally considered acceptable in the study area. LOS A indicates the best traffic operation, while LOS F indicates an intersection where demand exceeds capacity. Pine Hill Elementary School Expansion Traffic Study July 17, 2025 Page 6 For side-street stop (SSS) controlled intersections, special emphasis is given to providing an estimate for the level of service of the side-street approach. Traffic operations at an unsignalized intersection with side-street stop control can be described in two ways. First, consideration is given to the overall intersection level of service, which takes into account the total number of vehicles entering the intersection and the capability of the intersection to support the volumes. Second, it is important to consider the delay on the minor approach. Since the mainline does not have to stop, most delay is attributed to the side-street approaches. It is typical of intersections with higher mainline traffic volumes to experience high-levels of delay (i.e., poor levels of service) on the side-street approaches, but an acceptable overall intersection level of service during peak hour conditions. The existing intersection capacity analysis results, summarized in Table 2, indicate that all study intersections and approaches currently operate at LOS C or better during the typical a.m., school p.m., and p.m. peak hours. This includes the peak 15-minute pick-up / drop-off periods associated with the existing Pine Hill Elementary School. Note that these operations to do not account for any operational impacts associated with the crossing guard at the Hadley Avenue / 90th Street intersection or any internal pick-up / drop-off queuing impacts, which were identified earlier. Since these situations are difficult to model, the intersection capacity analysis is used to illustrate and compare operations under existing and future conditions. Detailed capacity analysis results are shown in the Appendix. AWSC – All Way Stop Control SSS – Side Street Stop RAB – Roundabout * Note that for the all-way stop and roundabout controlled intersections, the results shown represent the overall intersection level of service and average delay. For the side-street stop controlled intersections, the overall intersection level of service is shown, followed by the worst-approach level of service and worst-approach average delay. Level of Service Average Delay / Vehicles Unsignalized Intersections Signalized Intersections A < 10 seconds < 10 seconds B 10 to 15 seconds 10 to 20 seconds C 15 to 25 seconds 20 to 35 seconds D 25 to 35 seconds 35 to 55 seconds E 35 to 50 seconds 55 to 80 seconds F > 50 seconds > 80 seconds Table 2 Existing Intersection Capacity Hadley Avenue Intersection Traffic Control Level of Service (Delay in Seconds)* AM Peak Hour School PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Peak 15 Overall Peak 15 Overall Peak 15 Overall 90th Street AWSC A (8) A (7) A (8) A (8) A (7) A (7) North School Access SSS A / B (11) A / A (7) A / B (10) A / A (9) A / A (7) A / A (6) Central School Access SSS A / A (8) A / A (6) A / A (6) A / A (5) A / A (5) A / A (4) South School Access SSS A / C (17) A / B (12) A / B (12) A / B (11) A / B (11) A / A (9) 92nd Street SSS A / B (12) A / A (9) A / B (11) A / A (8) A / A (8) A / A (7) 94th Street SSS A / A (9) A / A (8) A / A (8) A / A (6) A / A (9) A / A (7) 95th Street RAB A (5) A (5) A (5) A (5) A (5) A (5) Pine Hill Elementary School Expansion Traffic Study July 17, 2025 Page 7 PROPOSED EXPANSION The proposed project includes a 12,860 square foot building expansion for additional classrooms, a storm shelter, and an expanded gym. Once completed, Pine Hill Elementary School would be a total of 75,060 square feet and is anticipated to have a future student capacity of approximately 650 students and up to 100 staff members. Note that there are currently about 520 students and 80 staff members. For purposes of this study, full-capacity of the school was assumed to occur by the year 2030. Note that to accommodate any additional students, another building expansion project would be needed and therefore was not evaluated as part of this study. No changes to the current access, parking, or circulation patterns are planned as part of the project. TRAFFIC FORECASTS Traffic forecasts were developed for year 2030 no build and build conditions. The traffic forecasts account for general background growth and trip generation from the proposed expansion. The following information summarizes the traffic forecast development process. Background Growth To account for general background growth in the study area, an annual growth rate of one and a half (1.5) percent was applied to the existing traffic volumes to develop year 2030 background traffic forecasts. This growth rate accounts for development outside of the study area and is consistent with historical growth trends and the Cottage Grove 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The resultant year 2030 no build conditions, which account for the background growth, is shown in Figure 3. Proposed Expansion Trip Generation To account for traffic associated with the proposed expansion and in particular, the anticipated increase in student capacity / staff members, a trip generation estimate was developed using a combination of the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition and traffic count data collected at the school access locations. Results of the trip generation analysis, which are summarized in Table 3, indicate that Pine Hill Elementary School currently generates trips at a rate similar to the ITE trip generation rate, although there are relatively small differences in the magnitude and in / out travel patterns. Thus, for purposes of this study, the current trip generation rates (i.e., actual data) were used to estimate the future trip generation increase associated with the proposed expansion. Table 3 Trip Generation Summary Land Use Type Size (Students) AM Pk Hr School PM Pk Hr PM Pk Hr Daily In Out In Out In Out Existing School (ITE Comparison) 520 208 177 108 126 38 45 1,180 Existing School (Actual Counts) 520 224 207 85 160 22 35 1,200 Proposed School Expansion (Actual) +130 +56 +52 +21 +40 +6 +9 +300 Total Future School Trips (Year 2030) 650 280 259 21 40 6 9 1,500 Year 2030 No Build Conditions Pine Hill Elementary School Expansion Traffic Study 13 [6] (4)5 [4] (2)55 [19] (16) 4 [8] (1)5 [3] (3)16 [4] (16) 51 [ 5 4 ] ( 2 0 ) 38 1 [ 3 0 5 ] ( 2 7 9 ) 10 [ 9 ] ( 1 4 ) 1 [ 9 ] ( 3 ) 16 4 [ 3 0 5 ] ( 3 1 8 ) 1 [ 5 ] ( 3 ) 4 [18] (3)3 [9] (2) 43 8 [ 3 5 0 ] ( 3 1 0 ) 14 [ 3 ] ( 0 ) 22 5 [ 3 2 4 ] ( 3 4 7 ) 10 [ 4 ] ( 3 ) 145 [88] (16)2 [2] (0) 30 7 [ 2 6 5 ] ( 2 9 4 ) 22 8 [ 3 3 3 ] ( 3 4 9 ) 2 [5] (2)66 [50] (14) 30 5 [ 2 6 0 ] ( 2 9 2 ) 13 3 [ 6 6 ] ( 1 0 ) 14 5 [ 3 1 7 ] ( 3 3 8 ) 85 [ 1 8 ] ( 1 1 ) 38 [18] (16)1 [0] (3)4 [9] (5) 36 [30] (26)1 [0] (0)1 [1] (2) 5 [ 1 0 ] ( 1 2 ) 36 4 [ 2 7 8 ] ( 2 6 0 ) 1 [ 4 ] ( 1 ) 14 [ 2 6 ] ( 1 9 ) 17 9 [ 2 9 3 ] ( 2 8 7 ) 18 [ 4 8 ] ( 4 6 ) 24 [16] (14)1 [2] (0)4 [11] (2) 22 [11] (8)0 [5] (1)1 [2] (4) 4 [ 9 ] ( 8 ) 32 4 [ 2 6 5 ] ( 2 5 1 ) 1 [ 1 0 ] ( 4 ) 4 [ 1 9 ] ( 1 1 ) 17 1 [ 2 7 1 ] ( 2 7 2 ) 9 [ 1 3 ] ( 1 1 ) 450 700 350400 900 600 6, 5 5 0 1,400 3,150 3. 1 5 0 5,9 5 0 42 [29] (11)27 [30] (41)4 [5] (1) 97 [99] (122)26 [36] (70)4 [13] (24) 1 [ 1 2 ] ( 4 ) 19 0 [ 1 5 6 ] ( 1 3 0 ) 17 [ 1 7 ] ( 2 0 ) 20 [ 2 4 ] ( 3 3 ) 81 [ 1 4 9 ] ( 1 4 5 ) 75 [ 1 1 1 ] ( 1 0 0 ) Legend AM Peak Hour VolumeSchool PM Peak Hour VolumePM Peak Hour VolumeEstimated ADT VolumeStop SignRoundabout XXX[XXX](XXX)X,XXX N Had l e y A v e S 95th St S 94th St S 92nd St S 90th St S Figure 3 0 [9] (4) 19 [46] (0) 7 [ 2 1 ] ( 8 ) 2 [ 9 ] ( 2 ) 0 [0] (0) 0 [0] (0) 2 [ 3 ] ( 3 ) 0 [0] (0) 0 [0] (0) 2 [ 4 ] ( 8 ) 0 [0] (0) 0 [0] (0) 2 [ 6 ] ( 5 ) 11 [15] (0) 0 [3] (3) 5 [ 1 0 ] ( 1 6 ) 4 [ 1 7 ] ( 5 ) 2 [0] (0) 0 [3] (2) 5 [ 6 ] ( 6 ) 3 [ 1 9 ] ( 8 ) 0 [0] (0) 0 [12] (0) 4 [ 2 ] ( 4 ) 0 [ 0 ] ( 0 ) Legend AM Peak Hour VolumeSchool PM Peak Hour VolumePM Peak Hour VolumeEstimated ADT VolumeStop SignRoundaboutPedestrian Volumes XXX[XXX](XXX)X,XXX X [X] (X) N Pine Hill Elementary School Expansion Traffic Study July 17, 2025 Page 9 The trip generation estimate indicates that the proposed expansion is anticipated to generate an additional 108 a.m. peak hour (56 in / 52 out), 61 school p.m. peak hour (21 in / 40 out), 15 p.m. peak hour (6 in / 9 out), and 300 daily (150 in / 150 out) trips; three (3) additional buses are expected. These additional trips were distributed throughout the study area using the directional distribution shown in Figure 4, which is based on a combination of existing area travel patterns and engineering judgment. The resultant year 2030 build conditions, which accounts for both the general background growth and trips from the proposed expansion, are illustrated in Figure 5. YEAR 2030 CONDITIONS To understand impacts associated with the proposed expansion, an intersection capacity analysis was completed for year 2030 no build and build conditions, which are summarized in Table 4. Results of the year 2030 intersection capacity analysis indicate t hat all study intersections and approaches are expected to operate at LOS D or better during the typical a.m., school p.m., and p.m. peak hours except the westbound approach at the South School Access. This approach is expected to operate near the LOS D / LOS E threshold during the peak 15-minute a.m. arrival period , which is about a 10-second increase for this approach from the year 2030 no build condition. This is anticipated to result in queues of approximately five (5) to seven (7) vehicles during this peak 15-minute period but will quickly dissipate following the beginning of school. Note that in general, infrastructure is not typically warranted to address a peak 15-minute situation. Therefore, since the overall peak hour operations are within acceptable standards, no additional infrastructure is needed to support the proposed expansion from an intersection capacity perspective. Detailed capacity analysis results are shown in the Appendix. However as noted earlier, these operations do not account for any operational impacts associated with the crossing guard at the Hadley Avenue / 90th Street intersection or any internal pick-up / drop-off queuing impacts, which were identified earlier. Since these situations are difficult to model, the intersection capacity analysis is used to illustrate and compare operations under no build and build conditions. Potential traffic management and infrastructure considerations are provided later in this report for further discussion between the project team, school, and area agencies. *Note that for the all-way stop and roundabout controlled intersections, the results shown represent the overall intersection level of service and average delay. For the side-street stop controlled intersections, the overall intersection level of service is shown, followed by the worst-approach level of service and worst-approach average delay. Table 4 Year 2030 Intersection Capacity Summary (No Build and Build Conditions) Hadley Avenue Intersection Level of Service (No Build Left Column : Build Right Column)* AM Peak Hour School PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Peak 15 Overall Peak 15 Overall Peak 15 Overall 90th Street A A A A A A A A A A A A North School Access A/C A/C A/B A/C A/B A/B A/B A/B A/A A/A A/A A/A Central School Access A/A A/A A/A A/A A/A A/A A/A A/A A/A A/A A/A A/A South School Access A/D A/E A/C A/D A/B A/C A/B A/B A/B A/B A/A A/A 92nd Street A/B A/C A/A A/B A/B A/A A/A A/A A/B A/B A/A A/A 94th Street A/B A/A A/A A/A A/A A/A A/A A/A A/A A/A A/A A/A 95th Street A A A A A A A A A A A A Figure 4Site Generated Trips Pine Hill Elementary School Expansion Traffic Study 0 [0] (0)0 [0] (0)0 [0] (0) 0 [0] (0)0 [0] (0)0 [0] (0) 0 [ 0 ] ( 0 ) 26 [ 2 0 ] ( 5 ) 0 [ 0 ] ( 0 ) 0 [ 0 ] ( 0 ) 28 [ 1 0 ] ( 3 ) 0 [ 0 ] ( 0 ) 3 [2] (0)2 [2] (0) 23 [ 1 8 ] ( 5 ) 3 [ 1 ] ( 0 ) 25 [ 9 ] ( 3 ) 3 [ 1 ] ( 0 ) 21 [16] (5)0 [0] (0) 5 [ 3 ] ( 0 ) 27 [ 1 1 ] ( 3 ) 2 [2] (0)24 [18] (5) 3 [ 1 ] ( 0 ) 25 [ 9 ] ( 3 ) 2 [ 2 ] ( 0 ) 25 [ 9 ] ( 3 ) 0 [0] (0)0 [0] (0)0 [0] (0) 0 [0] (0)0 [0] (0)0 [0] (0) 0 [ 0 ] ( 0 ) 28 [ 1 0 ] ( 3 ) 0 [ 0 ] ( 0 ) 0 [ 0 ] ( 0 ) 26 [ 2 0 ] ( 5 ) 0 [ 0 ] ( 0 ) 0 [0] (0)0 [0] (0)0 [0] (0) 0 [0] (0)0 [0] (0)0 [0] (0) 0 [ 0 ] ( 0 ) 28 [ 1 0 ] ( 3 ) 0 [ 0 ] ( 0 ) 0 [ 0 ] ( 0 ) 26 [ 2 0 ] ( 5 ) 0 [ 0 ] ( 0 ) 0 0 00 0 0 35 0 0 175 17 5 350 0 [0] (0)0 [0] (0)0 [0] (0) 14 [5] (1)0 [0] (0)0 [0] (0) 0 [ 0 ] ( 0 ) 14 [ 5 ] ( 2 ) 0 [ 0 ] ( 0 ) 0 [ 0 ] ( 0 ) 13 [ 1 0 ] ( 3 ) 13 [ 1 0 ] ( 2 ) Legend AM Peak Hour Site TripsSchool PM Peak Hour Site TripsPM Peak Hour Site TripsADT Site TripsStop SignRoundaboutDirectional Distribution XXX[XXX](XXX)XXX N 50% 25% 25% Year 2030 Build Conditions Pine Hill Elementary School Expansion Traffic Study 13 [6] (4)5 [4] (2)55 [19] (16) 4 [8] (1)5 [3] (3)16 [4] (16) 51 [ 5 4 ] ( 2 0 ) 40 7 [ 3 2 5 ] ( 2 8 4 ) 10 [ 9 ] ( 1 4 ) 1 [ 9 ] ( 3 ) 19 2 [ 3 1 5 ] ( 3 2 1 ) 1 [ 5 ] ( 3 ) 7 [20] (3)5 [11] (2) 46 1 [ 3 6 8 ] ( 3 1 5 ) 17 [ 8 4 ] ( 0 ) 25 0 [ 3 3 3 ] ( 3 5 0 ) 13 [ 5 ] ( 3 ) 166 [104] (21)2 [2] (0) 31 2 [ 2 6 8 ] ( 2 9 4 ) 25 5 [ 3 4 4 ] ( 3 5 2 ) 4 [7] (2)90 [68] (19) 30 8 [ 2 6 1 ] ( 2 9 2 ) 15 8 [ 7 5 ] ( 1 3 ) 14 7 [ 3 1 9 ] ( 3 3 8 ) 11 0 [ 2 7 ] ( 1 4 ) 38 [18] (16)1 [0] (3)4 [9] (5) 36 [30] (26)1 [0] (0)1 [1] (2) 5 [ 1 0 ] ( 1 2 ) 39 2 [ 2 8 8 ] ( 2 6 3 ) 1 [ 4 ] ( 1 ) 14 [ 2 6 ] ( 1 9 ) 20 5 [ 3 1 3 ] ( 2 9 2 ) 18 [ 4 8 ] ( 4 6 ) 24 [16] (14)1 [2] (0)4 [11] (2) 22 [11] (8)0 [5] (1)1 [2] (4) 4 [ 9 ] ( 8 ) 35 4 [ 2 7 5 ] ( 2 5 4 ) 1 [ 1 0 ] ( 4 ) 4 [ 1 9 ] ( 1 1 ) 19 7 [ 2 9 1 ] ( 2 7 7 ) 9 [ 1 3 ] ( 1 1 ) 450 700 350400 900 600 6, 9 0 0 1,400 3,300 3, 3 0 0 6,2 0 0 42 [29] (11)27 [30] (41)4 [5] (1) 111 [104] (123)26 [36] (70)4 [13] (24) 1 [ 1 2 ] ( 4 ) 20 4 [ 1 6 1 ] ( 1 3 2 ) 17 [ 1 7 ] ( 2 0 ) 20 [ 2 4 ] ( 3 3 ) 94 [ 1 5 9 ] ( 1 4 8 ) 88 [ 1 2 1 ] ( 1 0 2 ) Legend AM Peak Hour VolumeSchool PM Peak Hour VolumePM Peak Hour VolumeEstimated ADT VolumeStop SignRoundabout XXX[XXX](XXX)X,XXX N Had l e y A v e S 95th St S 94th St S 92nd St S 90th St S Figure 5 0 [9] (4) 19 [46] (0) 7 [ 2 1 ] ( 8 ) 2 [ 9 ] ( 2 ) 0 [0] (0) 0 [0] (0) 2 [ 3 ] ( 3 ) 0 [0] (0) 0 [0] (0) 2 [ 4 ] ( 8 ) 0 [0] (0) 0 [0] (0) 2 [ 6 ] ( 5 ) 11 [15] (0) 0 [3] (3) 5 [ 1 0 ] ( 1 6 ) 4 [ 1 7 ] ( 5 ) 2 [0] (0) 0 [3] (2) 5 [ 6 ] ( 6 ) 3 [ 1 9 ] ( 8 ) 0 [0] (0) 0 [12] (0) 4 [ 2 ] ( 4 ) 0 [ 0 ] ( 0 ) Legend AM Peak Hour VolumeSchool PM Peak Hour VolumePM Peak Hour VolumeEstimated ADT VolumeStop SignRoundaboutPedestrian Volumes XXX[XXX](XXX)X,XXX X [X] (X) N Pine Hill Elementary School Expansion Traffic Study July 17, 2025 Page 12 SITE PLAN REVIEW / OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Although no significant issues were identified as part of the capacity analysis that warrant infrastructure mitigation given the relatively short-duration of impacts, the following management strategies and / or considerations are offered for further discussion between the project team, school, and area agencies. • Promote and / or provide incentives to increase student use of the bus and alternatives transportation modes (i.e., walk, bike, roll). • Restrict access to the pick-up / drop-off area before the end of school (i.e., 3:10 p.m.) along with providing education to guardians about the importance and safety benefits. • Provide the ability to enter the site via the Central School Access, particularly for motorists who park on site and pick-up students in the “walk zone for parked cars.” • Investigate and / or implement additional strategies to improve the overall efficiency of drop-off / pick-up operations, such as: o Allow motorists to exit the lane once the drop-off / pick-up has occurred, while ensuring student safety is maintained. o Ensure motorists utilize the majority of the drop-off / pick-up area, including the far northern portion of the drive lane near the bus parking lot. o Utilize both driveway aisles at the South School Access to increase overall vehicle stacking on-site and reduce the possibility of queues extending along Hadley Avenue; a zipper merge strategy could be utilized if ingress to the Central School Access were able to be provided. If these management strategies do not improve operations and / or eliminate the majority of the queues along Hadley Avenue, extension of the northbound right-turn lane could be considered. However, this should only be implemented as a last option given the higher benefit / lower cost strategies identified. The northbound right-turn lane extension could be implemented as part of a pedestrian ramp improvement project at the Hadley Avenue / 92nd Street intersection, which could improve the east-west crossings in this location to current ADA standards. As part of a future pedestrian crossing improvement at the Hadley Avenue / 92nd Street intersection, further evaluation of an enhanced pedestrian crossing should be completed. A preliminary review indicates that a rectangular rapid flashing beacon (RRFB) could be a potential enhancement to consider, however existing pedestrian activity is less than 15 pedestrians during the peak hours. In addition, the current 85th percentile speeds in this location are over 40-mph, which may make the feasibility of future implementation less likely. Pine Hill Elementary School Expansion Traffic Study July 17, 2025 Page 13 CONCLUSIONS Based on the findings of the study, the following conclusions are offered for consideration. 1) There does not appear to be any safety issues within the study area from a crash history perspective. 2) All study intersections and approaches currently operate at LOS C or better during the typical a.m., school p.m., and p.m. peak hours; this includes the peak 15-minute pick-up / drop-off periods associated with the existing Pine Hill Elementary School. 3) The following school operational observations were identified: a. During the a.m. peak period, internal school queues / operations did not significantly impact the adjacent roadway network, while the crossing guard operations at the Hadley Avenue / 90th Street intersection resulted in longer northbound queues along Hadley Avenue, but provided improved pedestrian / bicyclist crossing safety. b. During the a.m. peak period, northbound queues along Hadley Avenue extended to the north School Access for about 15-minutes, the Central School Access for about five (5) minutes, and the South School Access for one (1) minute; these queues quickly dissipated once the pedestrian / bicyclist activity ended and school began; overall school operations were relatively slow and orderly. c. During the school p.m. peak period, pick-up / drop-off operations have historically resulted in queues regularly extending off-site and into the northbound right-turn lane along Hadley Avenue; these queues were observed extending into the northbound turn lane for about 10 minutes prior to school ending, but dissipated within about five (5) minutes following the end of school. These queues are a result of several factors, including: Motorists arrive about 30 minutes before school ends and get into the pick-up queue. Once motorists are in the queue, they are directed to stay within the line until all vehicles in front of them complete their pick-up, which results in additional delays. Motorists wanting to park and pick-up can get stuck in the pick-up line along Hadley Avenue, further increasing the queues even though the inside lane is currently designated for park and pick-up users. Motorists do not regularly pull up to the far north end of the pick-up area, rather waiting near the primary school entrance, which reduces the number of pick-ups that can occur. d. During the school p.m. peak period, no significant operational issues were observed with motorists exiting the school; overall school operations were relatively slow and orderly. e. New procedures for pick-up and drop-off operations are in the planning stages for next year. 4) The proposed project includes a 12,860 square foot building expansion for additional classrooms, a storm shelter, and an expanded gym; future school capacity is 650 students and 100 staff members. 5) Traffic forecasts were developed for year 2030 no build and build conditions, which included a 1.5 percent annual background growth rate and trip generation from the proposed expansion. a. The future expansion is expected to generate an additional 108 a.m. peak hour (56 in / 52 out), 61 school p.m. peak hour (21 in / 40 out), 15 p.m. peak hour (6 in / 9 out), and 300 daily (150 in/ 150 out) trips. Pine Hill Elementary School Expansion Traffic Study July 17, 2025 Page 14 6) Under year 2030 conditions, all study intersections and approaches are expected to operate at LOS D or better during the typical a.m., school p.m., and p.m. peak hours, except the westbound approach at the South School Access; this approach is expected to operate near the LOS D/LOS E threshold during the peak 15-minute a.m. period, which is about a 10-second increase for this approach from the year 2030 no build condition. a. Infrastructure is not typically needed to address a peak 15-minute situation. Therefore, since the overall peak hour operations are within acceptable standards, no additional infrastructure is needed to support the proposed expansion from an intersection capacity perspective. 7) The following management strategies and / or considerations are offered for further discussion between the project team, school, and area agencies. • Promote and / or provide incentives to increase student use of the bus and alternatives transportation modes (i.e., walk, bike, roll). • Restrict access to the pick-up / drop-off area before the end of school (i.e., 3:10 p.m.) along with providing education to guardians about the importance and safety benefits. • Provide the ability to enter the site via the Central School Access, particularly for motorists who park on site and pick-up students in the “walk zone for parked cars.” • Investigate and / or implement additional strategies to improve the overall efficiency of drop-off and pick-up operations, such as: o Allow motorists to exit the lane once the drop-off / pick-up has occurred, while ensuring student safety is maintained. o Ensure motorists utilize the majority of the drop-off / pick-up area, including the far northern portion of the drive lane near the bus parking lot. o Utilize both driveway aisles at the South School Access to increase overall vehicle stacking on-site and reduce the possibility of queues extending along Hadley Avenue; a zipper merge strategy could be utilized if ingress to the Central School Access were able to be provided. If these management strategies do not improve operations and / or eliminate the majority of the queues along Hadley Avenue, extension of the northbound right-turn lane could be considered. 8) A pedestrian ramp improvement project at the Hadley Avenue / 92nd Street intersection should be considered, which could improve the east-west crossings in this location to current ADA standards; preliminary review indicates that a rectangular rapid flashing beacon (RRFB) could be a potential enhancement to consider, however existing pedestrian activity is less than 15 pedestrians during the peak hours. In addition, the current 85th percentile speeds in this location are over 40-mph, which may make the feasibility of future implementation less likely. Thus, further discussion with the City should occur before determining if / when a pedestrian improvement should be implemented. APPENDIX Intersection: Statewide Averages based on 2019-2023 crashes 0 0 0 1 2 3 = =Thru/STOP, Urban 0.249 0.000 0.145 0.414 0.470 6.940 0.53 0.00 Intersection Safety Screening Hadley Avenue & South School Access Crashes by Crash Severity Intersection Characteristics Fatal (K)Entering Volume 6,600 Incapacitating Injury (A)Environment Urban Minor Injury (B)Lighting Lit Possible Injury (C)Traffic Control Thru-Stop Observed Observed Property Damage (PDO) Total Crashes Annual crash cost $43,200 Statewide comparison Total Crash Rate Fatal & Serious Injury Crash Rate The observed crash rate is the number of crashes per million entering vehicles (MEV). The critical rate is a statistical comparison based on similar intersections statewide. An observed crash rate greater than the critical rate indicates that the intersection operates outside the expected, normal range. The critical index reports the magnitude of this difference (i.e. observed crash rate ÷ critical crash rate). The observed total crash rate for this period is 0.25 per MEV; this is 47% below the critical rate. Based on similar statewide intersections, an additional 3 crashes over the five years would indicate this intersection operates outside the normal range. The observed fatal and serious injury crash rate for this period is 0.00 per 100 MEV; this is 100% below the critical rate. The intersection operates within the normal range. Statewide Average Statewide Average Critical Rate Critical Rate Critical Index Critical Index Developed by MnDOT Office of Traffic Engineering. January 2022. Intersection: Statewide Averages based on 2019-2023 crashes 0 0 0 1 6 7 = =Roundabout 0.628 0.000 0.973 0.460 1.780 7.550 0.35 0.00 Intersection Safety Screening Hadley Avenue & 95th Street Crashes by Crash Severity Intersection Characteristics Fatal (K) Entering Volume 6,100 Incapacitating Injury (A) Environment Urban Minor Injury (B) Lighting Lit Possible Injury (C) Traffic Control Roundabout Observed Observed Property Damage (PDO) Total Crashes Annual crash cost $57,600 Statewide comparison Total Crash Rate Fatal & Serious Injury Crash Rate The observed crash rate is the number of crashes per million entering vehicles (MEV). The critical rate is a statistical comparison based on similar intersections statewide. An observed crash rate greater than the critical rate indicates that the intersection operates outside the expected, normal range. The critical index reports the magnitude of this difference (i.e. observed crash rate ÷ critical crash rate). The observed total crash rate for this period is 0.63 per MEV; this is 65% below the critical rate. Based on similar statewide intersections, an additional 13 crashes over the five years would indicate this intersection operates outside the normal range. The observed fatal and serious injury crash rate for this period is 0.00 per 100 MEV; this is 100% below the critical rate. The intersection operates within the normal range. Statewide Average Statewide Average Critical Rate Critical Rate Critical Index Critical Index Developed by MnDOT Office of Traffic Engineering. January 2022. SimTraffic Performance Report AM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 1 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Interval #1 7:45 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.0 5.5 7.2 6.8 6.8 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Interval #2 8:00 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 5.0 6.0 8.2 7.1 7.5 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Interval #3 8:15 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.5 6.3 7.0 6.9 6.6 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Interval #4 8:30 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.5 3.8 7.0 6.5 6.4 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Entire Run Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.1 5.4 7.5 7.1 7.0 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Interval #1 7:45 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 5.2 0.7 2.1 1.2 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Interval #2 8:00 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 11.0 0.9 3.8 1.9 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Interval #3 8:15 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 5.4 0.7 2.3 1.3 SimTraffic Performance Report AM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 2 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Interval #4 8:30 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 5.0 0.6 1.9 1.1 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Entire Run Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.0 0.8 2.7 1.5 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Interval #1 7:45 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.9 0.3 0.2 0.8 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Interval #2 8:00 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.3 0.7 0.4 2.5 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Interval #3 8:15 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.6 0.3 0.2 0.8 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Interval #4 8:30 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.2 0.3 0.1 1.0 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Entire Run Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 5.6 0.4 0.2 1.4 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Interval #1 7:45 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.3 0.4 0.9 1.0 SimTraffic Performance Report AM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 3 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Interval #2 8:00 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 3.9 0.1 0.0 0.5 Total Del/Veh (s) 16.1 0.7 2.5 3.0 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Interval #3 8:15 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.9 0.4 1.0 1.2 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Interval #4 8:30 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 4.2 0.0 0.0 0.3 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.1 0.4 1.1 1.0 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Entire Run Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 Total Del/Veh (s) 11.3 0.5 1.5 1.8 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Interval #1 7:45 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 9.1 4.2 1.0 0.8 1.6 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Interval #2 8:00 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 11.4 5.4 1.0 0.8 1.7 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Interval #3 8:15 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.0 3.5 0.6 0.6 1.1 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Interval #4 8:30 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.2 3.5 0.7 0.7 1.2 SimTraffic Performance Report AM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 4 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Entire Run Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 8.5 4.3 0.9 0.7 1.5 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Interval #1 7:45 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.5 3.7 0.6 0.6 1.0 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Interval #2 8:00 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 8.8 4.4 0.8 0.5 1.2 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Interval #3 8:15 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.6 3.4 0.5 0.4 0.7 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Interval #4 8:30 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 8.7 3.7 0.5 0.5 1.1 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Entire Run Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.6 3.8 0.6 0.5 1.0 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Interval #1 7:45 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.3 3.5 5.3 3.4 4.1 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Interval #2 8:00 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 2.9 3.8 5.9 3.5 4.4 SimTraffic Performance Report AM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 5 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Interval #3 8:15 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.2 3.4 5.0 3.3 3.8 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Interval #4 8:30 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.4 3.5 5.0 3.4 4.0 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Entire Run Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.2 3.6 5.5 3.5 4.2 Total Network Performance By Interval Interval Start 7:45 8:00 8:15 8:30 All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 Total Del/Veh (s) 10.9 12.7 10.0 10.5 11.9 Queuing and Blocking Report AM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 6 Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, Interval #1 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 43 40 104 78 Average Queue (ft) 28 18 67 45 95th Queue (ft) 48 45 106 76 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, Interval #2 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 59 44 119 79 Average Queue (ft) 36 23 76 50 95th Queue (ft) 65 50 116 84 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, Interval #3 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 44 35 92 68 Average Queue (ft) 28 15 61 46 95th Queue (ft) 54 40 107 72 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report AM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 7 Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, Interval #4 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 40 35 102 65 Average Queue (ft) 28 14 62 45 95th Queue (ft) 48 40 90 67 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, All Intervals Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 61 48 138 95 Average Queue (ft) 30 17 66 47 95th Queue (ft) 55 44 106 75 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, Interval #1 Movement WB NB SB Directions Served LR TR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 56 10 32 Average Queue (ft) 13 1 6 95th Queue (ft) 51 15 40 Link Distance (ft) 538 147 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report AM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 8 Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, Interval #2 Movement WB NB SB Directions Served LR TR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 62 17 116 Average Queue (ft) 19 3 34 95th Queue (ft) 65 21 107 Link Distance (ft) 538 147 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, Interval #3 Movement WB NB SB Directions Served LR TR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 33 15 46 Average Queue (ft) 6 2 9 95th Queue (ft) 35 17 50 Link Distance (ft) 538 147 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, Interval #4 Movement WB SB Directions Served LR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 48 21 Average Queue (ft) 12 3 95th Queue (ft) 51 23 Link Distance (ft) 538 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report AM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 9 Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, All Intervals Movement WB NB SB Directions Served LR TR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 72 31 117 Average Queue (ft) 12 2 13 95th Queue (ft) 52 15 63 Link Distance (ft) 538 147 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, Interval #1 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 69 Average Queue (ft) 36 95th Queue (ft) 60 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, Interval #2 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 109 Average Queue (ft) 66 95th Queue (ft) 107 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report AM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 10 Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, Interval #3 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 52 Average Queue (ft) 34 95th Queue (ft) 55 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, Interval #4 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 65 Average Queue (ft) 37 95th Queue (ft) 64 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, All Intervals Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 109 Average Queue (ft) 43 95th Queue (ft) 80 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report AM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 11 Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, Interval #1 Movement WB WB NB SB Directions Served L R R L Maximum Queue (ft) 40 4 4 40 Average Queue (ft) 22 1 1 16 95th Queue (ft) 43 9 7 46 Link Distance (ft) 529 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 225 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, Interval #2 Movement WB WB NB SB Directions Served L R R L Maximum Queue (ft) 72 44 35 66 Average Queue (ft) 44 13 10 42 95th Queue (ft) 79 70 40 71 Link Distance (ft) 529 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 225 Storage Blk Time (%) 12 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, Interval #3 Movement WB SB Directions Served L L Maximum Queue (ft) 54 46 Average Queue (ft) 26 17 95th Queue (ft) 54 48 Link Distance (ft) 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 Storage Blk Time (%) 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Queuing and Blocking Report AM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 12 Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, Interval #4 Movement WB WB NB SB Directions Served L R R L Maximum Queue (ft) 32 8 4 40 Average Queue (ft) 20 1 1 19 95th Queue (ft) 42 9 7 48 Link Distance (ft) 529 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 225 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, All Intervals Movement WB WB NB SB Directions Served L R R L Maximum Queue (ft) 73 49 35 68 Average Queue (ft) 28 4 3 23 95th Queue (ft) 59 34 20 58 Link Distance (ft) 529 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 225 Storage Blk Time (%) 4 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, Interval #1 Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 56 47 5 10 27 17 Average Queue (ft) 25 26 2 1 6 2 95th Queue (ft) 59 52 12 11 25 19 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 862 444 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report AM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 13 Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, Interval #2 Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 47 39 11 9 22 12 Average Queue (ft) 25 22 2 2 5 2 95th Queue (ft) 54 47 12 16 21 13 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 862 444 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, Interval #3 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR TR L Maximum Queue (ft) 40 34 10 16 Average Queue (ft) 25 17 1 2 95th Queue (ft) 50 45 15 15 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 862 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, Interval #4 Movement EB WB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 49 39 5 18 14 Average Queue (ft) 26 21 1 3 3 95th Queue (ft) 54 48 7 22 27 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 444 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report AM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 14 Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, All Intervals Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 65 53 11 24 35 31 Average Queue (ft) 25 21 1 1 4 2 95th Queue (ft) 54 49 9 12 21 17 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 862 444 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, Interval #1 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L L Maximum Queue (ft) 31 35 5 15 Average Queue (ft) 15 15 1 2 95th Queue (ft) 40 41 8 14 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, Interval #2 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR TR L Maximum Queue (ft) 41 31 5 11 Average Queue (ft) 25 20 1 2 95th Queue (ft) 52 42 7 14 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report AM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 15 Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, Interval #3 Movement EB WB NB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L Maximum Queue (ft) 34 35 6 5 5 Average Queue (ft) 9 12 0 1 2 95th Queue (ft) 38 38 0 7 12 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, Interval #4 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L L Maximum Queue (ft) 41 38 5 10 Average Queue (ft) 19 17 1 2 95th Queue (ft) 51 44 8 14 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, All Intervals Movement EB WB NB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L Maximum Queue (ft) 60 42 16 5 21 Average Queue (ft) 17 16 0 0 2 95th Queue (ft) 47 42 5 5 13 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report AM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 16 Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, Interval #1 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 51 36 46 10 Average Queue (ft) 8 12 16 2 95th Queue (ft) 39 40 53 18 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, Interval #2 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 25 52 72 29 Average Queue (ft) 4 23 26 7 95th Queue (ft) 22 58 70 29 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, Interval #3 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 24 34 38 10 Average Queue (ft) 3 11 15 2 95th Queue (ft) 19 35 47 17 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report AM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 17 Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, Interval #4 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 31 39 30 12 Average Queue (ft) 10 9 14 2 95th Queue (ft) 33 36 38 13 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, All Intervals Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 51 61 78 36 Average Queue (ft) 6 14 18 3 95th Queue (ft) 29 44 54 20 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #1: 0 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #2: 2 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #3: 0 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #4: 0 Network wide Queuing Penalty, All Intervals: 1 SimTraffic Performance Report Existing School PM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 1 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Interval #1 2:45 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.3 3.3 7.1 7.9 7.2 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Interval #2 3:00 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.7 4.5 7.0 9.2 7.8 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Interval #3 3:15 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.6 3.7 7.3 8.1 7.5 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Interval #4 3:30 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 5.6 6.9 7.6 9.0 8.1 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Entire Run Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.5 4.9 7.4 8.8 7.8 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Interval #1 2:45 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.5 0.6 2.4 1.4 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Interval #2 3:00 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 9.2 0.7 2.5 2.0 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Interval #3 3:15 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.5 0.6 2.2 1.4 SimTraffic Performance Report Existing School PM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 2 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Interval #4 3:30 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 10.2 0.6 2.4 1.6 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Entire Run Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 8.2 0.6 2.4 1.7 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Interval #1 2:45 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 2.9 0.2 0.1 0.4 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Interval #2 3:00 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 5.7 0.5 0.2 1.7 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Interval #3 3:15 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.1 0.2 0.1 0.4 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Interval #4 3:30 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.7 0.3 0.1 0.4 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Entire Run Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.8 0.3 0.2 0.9 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Interval #1 2:45 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 5.4 0.3 0.1 0.4 SimTraffic Performance Report Existing School PM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 3 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Interval #2 3:00 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 3.6 0.1 0.0 0.5 Total Del/Veh (s) 11.8 0.4 0.6 2.0 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Interval #3 3:15 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.3 0.4 0.1 0.6 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Interval #4 3:30 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 8.0 0.3 0.1 0.5 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Entire Run Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.3 Total Del/Veh (s) 10.3 0.4 0.3 1.0 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Interval #1 2:45 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.3 3.9 0.8 0.7 1.2 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Interval #2 3:00 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 11.0 3.6 0.8 1.0 1.3 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Interval #3 3:15 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.5 4.4 1.1 0.8 1.2 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Interval #4 3:30 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.6 3.9 0.8 0.8 1.1 SimTraffic Performance Report Existing School PM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 4 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Entire Run Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.6 3.6 0.9 0.9 1.2 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Interval #1 2:45 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 5.1 4.9 0.6 0.8 1.0 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Interval #2 3:00 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 5.7 7.8 0.8 0.9 1.3 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Interval #3 3:15 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.7 3.5 0.8 0.9 1.2 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Interval #4 3:30 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.7 4.7 0.7 0.9 1.3 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Entire Run Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 5.9 5.2 0.8 0.9 1.2 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Interval #1 2:45 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.5 3.1 4.7 3.7 3.8 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Interval #2 3:00 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.5 3.6 5.1 4.4 4.3 SimTraffic Performance Report Existing School PM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 5 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Interval #3 3:15 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.4 3.4 5.0 3.9 4.0 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Interval #4 3:30 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.8 3.5 4.7 4.1 4.1 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Entire Run Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.7 3.5 5.0 4.1 4.2 Total Network Performance By Interval Interval Start 2:45 3:00 3:15 3:30 All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.4 Total Del/Veh (s) 10.8 11.7 11.1 12.2 12.1 Queuing and Blocking Report Existing School PM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 6 Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, Interval #1 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 35 24 104 83 Average Queue (ft) 21 9 65 55 95th Queue (ft) 45 32 103 86 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, Interval #2 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 35 30 114 113 Average Queue (ft) 20 12 70 69 95th Queue (ft) 47 36 115 117 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, Interval #3 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 39 31 105 88 Average Queue (ft) 14 12 64 59 95th Queue (ft) 40 36 110 89 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report Existing School PM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 7 Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, Interval #4 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 40 30 106 116 Average Queue (ft) 17 13 68 67 95th Queue (ft) 41 36 108 118 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, All Intervals Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 48 31 138 141 Average Queue (ft) 18 11 67 62 95th Queue (ft) 44 35 109 105 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, Interval #1 Movement WB NB SB Directions Served LR TR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 68 16 10 Average Queue (ft) 14 2 1 95th Queue (ft) 57 17 15 Link Distance (ft) 538 147 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report Existing School PM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 8 Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, Interval #2 Movement WB NB SB Directions Served LR TR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 99 4 64 Average Queue (ft) 60 1 10 95th Queue (ft) 114 6 50 Link Distance (ft) 538 147 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, Interval #3 Movement WB NB SB Directions Served LR TR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 56 12 10 Average Queue (ft) 17 2 1 95th Queue (ft) 60 13 15 Link Distance (ft) 538 147 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, Interval #4 Movement WB NB SB Directions Served LR TR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 62 4 20 Average Queue (ft) 14 1 0 95th Queue (ft) 57 7 0 Link Distance (ft) 538 147 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report Existing School PM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 9 Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, All Intervals Movement WB NB SB Directions Served LR TR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 103 25 66 Average Queue (ft) 26 1 3 95th Queue (ft) 83 12 26 Link Distance (ft) 538 147 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, Interval #1 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 49 Average Queue (ft) 27 95th Queue (ft) 53 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, Interval #2 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 91 Average Queue (ft) 57 95th Queue (ft) 95 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report Existing School PM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 10 Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, Interval #3 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 44 Average Queue (ft) 25 95th Queue (ft) 50 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, Interval #4 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 47 Average Queue (ft) 23 95th Queue (ft) 52 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, All Intervals Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 94 Average Queue (ft) 33 95th Queue (ft) 71 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report Existing School PM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 11 Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, Interval #1 Movement WB WB SB Directions Served L R L Maximum Queue (ft) 33 12 19 Average Queue (ft) 14 2 4 95th Queue (ft) 39 13 20 Link Distance (ft) 529 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, Interval #2 Movement WB WB NB NB SB Directions Served L R T R L Maximum Queue (ft) 76 28 4 18 40 Average Queue (ft) 43 9 1 2 15 95th Queue (ft) 81 30 6 16 44 Link Distance (ft) 529 444 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 225 Storage Blk Time (%) 8 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, Interval #3 Movement WB WB SB Directions Served L R L Maximum Queue (ft) 29 12 12 Average Queue (ft) 13 2 1 95th Queue (ft) 35 13 9 Link Distance (ft) 529 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Queuing and Blocking Report Existing School PM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 12 Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, Interval #4 Movement WB WB SB Directions Served L R L Maximum Queue (ft) 28 12 6 Average Queue (ft) 12 3 1 95th Queue (ft) 33 14 9 Link Distance (ft) 529 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, All Intervals Movement WB WB NB NB SB Directions Served L R T R L Maximum Queue (ft) 76 28 4 18 40 Average Queue (ft) 21 4 0 0 5 95th Queue (ft) 55 19 3 8 25 Link Distance (ft) 529 444 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 225 Storage Blk Time (%) 2 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, Interval #1 Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 42 36 10 18 27 12 Average Queue (ft) 20 18 1 3 7 2 95th Queue (ft) 48 45 8 23 26 13 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 862 444 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report Existing School PM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 13 Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, Interval #2 Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 43 42 16 9 27 28 Average Queue (ft) 18 24 2 1 12 6 95th Queue (ft) 47 50 14 10 34 27 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 862 444 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, Interval #3 Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 41 47 14 28 32 6 Average Queue (ft) 17 18 2 5 14 1 95th Queue (ft) 48 49 13 32 38 9 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 862 444 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, Interval #4 Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 31 36 11 9 27 6 Average Queue (ft) 15 20 3 1 9 1 95th Queue (ft) 39 45 16 14 30 9 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 862 444 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report Existing School PM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 14 Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, All Intervals Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 54 55 26 46 32 28 Average Queue (ft) 18 20 2 3 11 2 95th Queue (ft) 46 47 13 21 33 16 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 862 444 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, Interval #1 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR TR L Maximum Queue (ft) 39 31 4 15 Average Queue (ft) 14 16 1 2 95th Queue (ft) 39 41 7 14 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, Interval #2 Movement EB WB NB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L Maximum Queue (ft) 43 31 16 4 16 Average Queue (ft) 25 20 3 1 2 95th Queue (ft) 53 43 17 6 12 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report Existing School PM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 15 Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, Interval #3 Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 36 31 20 15 20 6 Average Queue (ft) 19 12 4 2 3 1 95th Queue (ft) 45 36 18 14 16 9 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 600 862 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, Interval #4 Movement EB WB NB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L Maximum Queue (ft) 44 31 15 5 15 Average Queue (ft) 20 14 3 1 2 95th Queue (ft) 49 38 16 7 14 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, All Intervals Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 59 31 27 15 27 6 Average Queue (ft) 20 15 2 1 2 0 95th Queue (ft) 47 40 15 9 14 4 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 600 862 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report Existing School PM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 16 Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, Interval #1 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 25 35 39 29 Average Queue (ft) 8 13 18 8 95th Queue (ft) 30 39 45 32 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, Interval #2 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 40 44 62 68 Average Queue (ft) 12 14 22 21 95th Queue (ft) 39 45 52 65 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, Interval #3 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 36 43 44 34 Average Queue (ft) 9 17 15 5 95th Queue (ft) 35 49 44 28 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report Existing School PM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 17 Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, Interval #4 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 34 43 35 29 Average Queue (ft) 12 13 14 8 95th Queue (ft) 42 44 40 31 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, All Intervals Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 45 56 63 68 Average Queue (ft) 10 14 17 10 95th Queue (ft) 37 44 45 42 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #1: 0 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #2: 2 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #3: 0 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #4: 0 Network wide Queuing Penalty, All Intervals: 0 SimTraffic Performance Report Existing PM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 1 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Interval #1 4:00 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.9 5.1 6.3 6.9 6.4 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Interval #2 4:15 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.1 5.9 6.4 7.4 6.8 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Interval #3 4:30 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.1 5.5 6.2 7.0 6.5 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Interval #4 4:45 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.1 4.5 6.6 7.6 6.9 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Entire Run Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.9 5.2 6.4 7.4 6.8 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Interval #1 4:00 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.7 0.4 2.1 1.2 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Interval #2 4:15 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.3 0.4 2.1 1.4 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Interval #3 4:30 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.8 0.4 2.1 1.3 SimTraffic Performance Report Existing PM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 2 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Interval #4 4:45 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.0 0.4 2.2 1.4 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Entire Run Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 5.9 0.4 2.1 1.3 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Interval #1 4:00 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 2.8 0.1 0.0 0.1 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Interval #2 4:15 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.5 0.2 0.0 0.2 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Interval #3 4:30 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.3 0.1 0.0 0.1 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Interval #4 4:45 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.4 0.2 0.0 0.2 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Entire Run Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.5 0.1 0.0 0.1 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Interval #1 4:00 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 12.9 0.3 0.1 0.4 SimTraffic Performance Report Existing PM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 3 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Interval #2 4:15 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.9 0.3 0.2 0.5 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Interval #3 4:30 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 10.8 0.3 0.1 0.4 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Interval #4 4:45 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.6 0.3 0.1 0.3 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Entire Run Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 8.2 0.3 0.1 0.4 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Interval #1 4:00 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.3 3.6 0.6 0.6 0.9 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Interval #2 4:15 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.2 4.6 0.7 0.7 1.0 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Interval #3 4:30 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.8 3.2 0.6 0.6 1.0 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Interval #4 4:45 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.5 3.5 0.6 0.6 0.9 SimTraffic Performance Report Existing PM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 4 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Entire Run Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.9 3.7 0.6 0.6 1.0 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Interval #1 4:00 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.5 5.7 0.5 0.6 0.7 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Interval #2 4:15 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 8.0 4.5 0.6 0.7 0.9 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Interval #3 4:30 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 5.7 5.8 0.5 0.7 0.9 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Interval #4 4:45 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 8.7 5.7 0.4 0.8 0.9 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Entire Run Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.3 5.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Interval #1 4:00 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.5 3.7 4.7 4.1 4.1 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Interval #2 4:15 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.7 4.0 5.0 4.3 4.3 SimTraffic Performance Report Existing PM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 5 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Interval #3 4:30 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.4 3.7 4.7 3.8 3.9 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Interval #4 4:45 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.0 3.9 4.7 4.3 4.2 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Entire Run Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.7 3.9 4.8 4.2 4.2 Total Network Performance By Interval Interval Start 4:00 4:15 4:30 4:45 All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 10.7 11.4 10.5 11.4 11.8 Queuing and Blocking Report Existing PM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 6 Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, Interval #1 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 35 25 85 77 Average Queue (ft) 18 11 55 51 95th Queue (ft) 44 35 83 78 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, Interval #2 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 34 31 81 79 Average Queue (ft) 18 15 55 58 95th Queue (ft) 44 40 82 82 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, Interval #3 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 35 30 67 69 Average Queue (ft) 13 4 49 48 95th Queue (ft) 40 22 75 73 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report Existing PM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 7 Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, Interval #4 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 31 31 75 73 Average Queue (ft) 16 14 54 55 95th Queue (ft) 40 38 78 75 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, All Intervals Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 43 31 94 93 Average Queue (ft) 16 11 53 53 95th Queue (ft) 42 35 80 78 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, Interval #1 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 18 Average Queue (ft) 3 95th Queue (ft) 19 Link Distance (ft) 538 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report Existing PM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 8 Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, Interval #2 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 23 Average Queue (ft) 5 95th Queue (ft) 24 Link Distance (ft) 538 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, Interval #3 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 23 Average Queue (ft) 5 95th Queue (ft) 23 Link Distance (ft) 538 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, Interval #4 Movement WB SB Directions Served LR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 23 12 Average Queue (ft) 4 2 95th Queue (ft) 20 13 Link Distance (ft) 538 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report Existing PM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 9 Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, All Intervals Movement WB SB Directions Served LR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 30 12 Average Queue (ft) 4 0 95th Queue (ft) 21 6 Link Distance (ft) 538 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, Interval #1 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 31 Average Queue (ft) 10 95th Queue (ft) 33 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, Interval #2 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 31 Average Queue (ft) 12 95th Queue (ft) 36 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report Existing PM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 10 Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, Interval #3 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 30 Average Queue (ft) 10 95th Queue (ft) 32 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, Interval #4 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 34 Average Queue (ft) 8 95th Queue (ft) 31 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, All Intervals Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 36 Average Queue (ft) 10 95th Queue (ft) 33 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report Existing PM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 11 Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, Interval #1 Movement WB WB SB Directions Served L R L Maximum Queue (ft) 20 4 12 Average Queue (ft) 5 1 2 95th Queue (ft) 22 6 13 Link Distance (ft) 529 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, Interval #2 Movement WB WB SB Directions Served L R L Maximum Queue (ft) 25 11 25 Average Queue (ft) 11 2 6 95th Queue (ft) 31 10 26 Link Distance (ft) 529 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, Interval #3 Movement WB WB SB Directions Served L R L Maximum Queue (ft) 29 8 12 Average Queue (ft) 8 1 3 95th Queue (ft) 29 9 19 Link Distance (ft) 529 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 Storage Blk Time (%) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Queuing and Blocking Report Existing PM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 12 Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, Interval #4 Movement WB WB SB Directions Served L R L Maximum Queue (ft) 25 4 12 Average Queue (ft) 7 1 2 95th Queue (ft) 26 6 13 Link Distance (ft) 529 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, All Intervals Movement WB WB SB Directions Served L R L Maximum Queue (ft) 29 16 25 Average Queue (ft) 8 1 3 95th Queue (ft) 27 8 19 Link Distance (ft) 529 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, Interval #1 Movement EB WB NB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L Maximum Queue (ft) 39 31 11 9 26 Average Queue (ft) 17 18 2 1 10 95th Queue (ft) 44 42 12 14 32 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 862 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report Existing PM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 13 Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, Interval #2 Movement EB WB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 35 35 21 32 12 Average Queue (ft) 18 18 4 12 1 95th Queue (ft) 43 44 20 35 9 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 444 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, Interval #3 Movement EB WB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 35 31 16 32 12 Average Queue (ft) 15 24 4 8 2 95th Queue (ft) 41 43 19 31 13 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 444 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, Interval #4 Movement EB WB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 35 31 16 20 6 Average Queue (ft) 16 17 4 4 1 95th Queue (ft) 41 42 19 23 9 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 444 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report Existing PM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 14 Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, All Intervals Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 48 36 27 9 40 12 Average Queue (ft) 16 19 3 0 8 1 95th Queue (ft) 43 43 18 7 31 9 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 862 444 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, Interval #1 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L L Maximum Queue (ft) 31 24 10 6 Average Queue (ft) 10 5 1 1 95th Queue (ft) 33 23 8 8 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, Interval #2 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L L Maximum Queue (ft) 35 30 16 16 Average Queue (ft) 17 11 2 2 95th Queue (ft) 43 34 14 15 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report Existing PM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 15 Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, Interval #3 Movement EB WB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 31 31 5 10 12 Average Queue (ft) 14 10 1 1 2 95th Queue (ft) 39 34 8 8 13 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 862 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, Interval #4 Movement EB WB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L Maximum Queue (ft) 31 36 16 Average Queue (ft) 11 11 3 95th Queue (ft) 35 37 17 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, All Intervals Movement EB WB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 36 36 16 27 12 Average Queue (ft) 13 9 1 2 0 95th Queue (ft) 38 33 9 13 6 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 862 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report Existing PM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 16 Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, Interval #1 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 32 44 24 45 Average Queue (ft) 6 16 11 15 95th Queue (ft) 31 49 34 51 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, Interval #2 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 25 53 42 67 Average Queue (ft) 8 19 11 28 95th Queue (ft) 30 56 41 69 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, Interval #3 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 31 35 34 29 Average Queue (ft) 8 12 11 8 95th Queue (ft) 30 40 35 32 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report Existing PM Peak Hour 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 17 Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, Interval #4 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 30 40 37 53 Average Queue (ft) 6 15 11 19 95th Queue (ft) 26 46 40 57 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, All Intervals Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 39 58 47 72 Average Queue (ft) 7 16 11 17 95th Queue (ft) 29 48 38 55 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #1: 0 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #2: 0 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #3: 0 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #4: 0 Network wide Queuing Penalty, All Intervals: 0 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 No Build AM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 1 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Interval #1 7:45 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.5 6.6 7.2 6.8 6.8 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Interval #2 8:00 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.3 7.1 8.7 7.4 7.9 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Interval #3 8:15 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.2 5.7 8.2 7.4 7.6 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Interval #4 8:30 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.2 5.7 7.6 6.9 7.0 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Entire Run Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.3 5.6 8.1 7.4 7.5 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Interval #1 7:45 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 9.7 0.7 2.1 1.3 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Interval #2 8:00 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 19.5 1.1 3.3 2.1 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Interval #3 8:15 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 10.9 0.9 2.3 1.4 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 No Build AM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 2 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Interval #4 8:30 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 11.1 0.7 2.0 1.2 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Entire Run Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 13.9 0.9 2.5 1.6 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Interval #1 7:45 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.1 0.3 0.1 1.0 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Interval #2 8:00 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 9.1 0.9 0.4 3.4 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Interval #3 8:15 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.5 0.4 0.2 1.0 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Interval #4 8:30 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.2 0.3 0.1 0.8 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Entire Run Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.7 0.5 0.2 1.8 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Interval #1 7:45 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 Total Del/Veh (s) 9.2 0.4 1.1 1.2 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 No Build AM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 3 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Interval #2 8:00 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 3.9 0.0 0.1 0.5 Total Del/Veh (s) 24.8 0.9 4.0 4.3 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Interval #3 8:15 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 10.6 0.5 1.2 1.4 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Interval #4 8:30 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.7 0.4 0.8 1.1 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Entire Run Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.3 Total Del/Veh (s) 16.5 0.6 2.0 2.3 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Interval #1 7:45 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 8.3 5.2 0.7 0.7 1.4 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Interval #2 8:00 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 11.0 5.8 1.2 1.3 2.0 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Interval #3 8:15 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 8.5 6.3 0.9 0.7 1.6 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Interval #4 8:30 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.7 4.7 0.7 0.7 1.4 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 No Build AM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 4 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Entire Run Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 8.8 5.3 0.9 0.9 1.6 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Interval #1 7:45 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.7 4.8 0.5 0.5 1.0 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Interval #2 8:00 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 11.2 4.8 0.9 0.6 1.5 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Interval #3 8:15 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.2 3.1 0.6 0.4 1.0 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Interval #4 8:30 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.9 4.7 0.6 0.5 1.1 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Entire Run Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 8.3 4.5 0.7 0.5 1.2 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Interval #1 7:45 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.4 3.5 5.3 3.4 4.1 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Interval #2 8:00 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.3 4.6 5.9 3.7 4.7 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 No Build AM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 5 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Interval #3 8:15 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.3 3.4 5.2 3.6 4.0 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Interval #4 8:30 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.4 3.4 5.1 3.5 4.0 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Entire Run Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.3 3.8 5.5 3.5 4.3 Total Network Performance By Interval Interval Start 7:45 8:00 8:15 8:30 All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.4 Total Del/Veh (s) 11.0 14.8 12.1 11.1 13.3 Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build AM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 6 Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, Interval #1 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 73 34 112 69 Average Queue (ft) 36 11 67 46 95th Queue (ft) 66 36 109 72 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, Interval #2 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 63 44 133 89 Average Queue (ft) 39 19 82 52 95th Queue (ft) 68 49 133 85 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, Interval #3 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 51 42 113 78 Average Queue (ft) 29 19 74 49 95th Queue (ft) 51 48 114 82 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build AM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 7 Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, Interval #4 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 51 36 107 68 Average Queue (ft) 33 21 67 46 95th Queue (ft) 55 46 105 73 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, All Intervals Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 80 52 154 90 Average Queue (ft) 34 17 72 48 95th Queue (ft) 61 46 117 79 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, Interval #1 Movement WB SB Directions Served LR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 46 52 Average Queue (ft) 14 7 95th Queue (ft) 60 50 Link Distance (ft) 538 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build AM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 8 Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, Interval #2 Movement WB NB SB Directions Served LR TR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 72 22 105 Average Queue (ft) 31 6 40 95th Queue (ft) 90 29 107 Link Distance (ft) 538 147 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, Interval #3 Movement WB NB SB Directions Served LR TR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 30 15 73 Average Queue (ft) 7 2 15 95th Queue (ft) 33 17 71 Link Distance (ft) 538 147 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, Interval #4 Movement WB NB SB Directions Served LR TR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 51 4 58 Average Queue (ft) 13 1 11 95th Queue (ft) 51 7 50 Link Distance (ft) 538 147 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build AM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 9 Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, All Intervals Movement WB NB SB Directions Served LR TR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 97 35 117 Average Queue (ft) 16 2 18 95th Queue (ft) 62 17 75 Link Distance (ft) 538 147 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, Interval #1 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 71 Average Queue (ft) 40 95th Queue (ft) 62 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, Interval #2 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 143 Average Queue (ft) 79 95th Queue (ft) 142 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build AM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 10 Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, Interval #3 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 60 Average Queue (ft) 39 95th Queue (ft) 66 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, Interval #4 Movement WB SB Directions Served LR T Maximum Queue (ft) 49 7 Average Queue (ft) 34 1 95th Queue (ft) 54 10 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, All Intervals Movement WB SB Directions Served LR T Maximum Queue (ft) 145 7 Average Queue (ft) 48 0 95th Queue (ft) 96 5 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 75 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build AM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 11 Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, Interval #1 Movement WB WB NB SB Directions Served L R R L Maximum Queue (ft) 56 4 13 47 Average Queue (ft) 23 1 2 23 95th Queue (ft) 52 6 12 56 Link Distance (ft) 529 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 225 Storage Blk Time (%) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, Interval #2 Movement WB WB NB NB SB Directions Served L R T R L Maximum Queue (ft) 85 66 19 42 82 Average Queue (ft) 47 15 1 12 48 95th Queue (ft) 90 78 9 39 76 Link Distance (ft) 529 444 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 225 Storage Blk Time (%) 17 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, Interval #3 Movement WB WB NB SB Directions Served L R R L Maximum Queue (ft) 51 10 6 56 Average Queue (ft) 22 1 1 21 95th Queue (ft) 52 8 9 54 Link Distance (ft) 529 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 225 Storage Blk Time (%) 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build AM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 12 Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, Interval #4 Movement WB WB SB Directions Served L R L Maximum Queue (ft) 45 4 49 Average Queue (ft) 26 0 18 95th Queue (ft) 49 0 51 Link Distance (ft) 529 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 Storage Blk Time (%) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, All Intervals Movement WB WB NB NB SB Directions Served L R T R L Maximum Queue (ft) 89 70 19 44 88 Average Queue (ft) 30 4 0 4 27 95th Queue (ft) 66 38 4 21 65 Link Distance (ft) 529 444 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 225 Storage Blk Time (%) 5 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, Interval #1 Movement EB WB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 40 42 5 16 12 Average Queue (ft) 22 26 1 4 2 95th Queue (ft) 50 50 7 19 13 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 444 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build AM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 13 Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, Interval #2 Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 57 40 11 6 39 16 Average Queue (ft) 32 23 2 1 11 2 95th Queue (ft) 61 48 12 7 38 18 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 862 444 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, Interval #3 Movement EB WB NB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L Maximum Queue (ft) 48 47 6 5 27 Average Queue (ft) 25 26 1 1 7 95th Queue (ft) 55 57 8 8 26 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 862 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, Interval #4 Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 49 35 5 3 27 6 Average Queue (ft) 29 22 1 0 5 1 95th Queue (ft) 57 46 7 5 21 8 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 862 444 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build AM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 14 Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, All Intervals Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 68 51 21 8 39 33 Average Queue (ft) 27 24 1 1 7 1 95th Queue (ft) 56 50 9 6 27 12 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 862 444 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, Interval #1 Movement EB WB NB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L Maximum Queue (ft) 43 44 5 9 5 Average Queue (ft) 19 13 1 0 1 95th Queue (ft) 48 45 7 0 8 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, Interval #2 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR TR L Maximum Queue (ft) 52 36 5 21 Average Queue (ft) 27 20 1 4 95th Queue (ft) 59 45 11 20 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build AM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 15 Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, Interval #3 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR TR L Maximum Queue (ft) 40 31 3 20 Average Queue (ft) 25 16 0 3 95th Queue (ft) 52 41 5 16 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, Interval #4 Movement EB WB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L Maximum Queue (ft) 39 39 11 Average Queue (ft) 19 18 1 95th Queue (ft) 48 47 8 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, All Intervals Movement EB WB NB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L Maximum Queue (ft) 68 49 5 14 26 Average Queue (ft) 23 17 0 0 2 95th Queue (ft) 52 45 4 6 14 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build AM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 16 Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, Interval #1 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 31 38 43 29 Average Queue (ft) 9 11 13 4 95th Queue (ft) 31 42 43 24 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, Interval #2 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 31 62 68 23 Average Queue (ft) 8 28 26 3 95th Queue (ft) 30 67 69 18 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, Interval #3 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 40 39 40 12 Average Queue (ft) 10 17 15 3 95th Queue (ft) 37 46 43 16 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build AM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 17 Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, Interval #4 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 39 45 44 22 Average Queue (ft) 12 16 11 3 95th Queue (ft) 42 43 37 18 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, All Intervals Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 49 75 71 35 Average Queue (ft) 10 18 16 3 95th Queue (ft) 35 51 50 19 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #1: 0 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #2: 2 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #3: 1 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #4: 0 Network wide Queuing Penalty, All Intervals: 1 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 No Build School PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 1 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Interval #1 2:45 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.3 4.6 7.1 8.1 7.3 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Interval #2 3:00 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.7 4.3 7.2 9.7 8.1 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Interval #3 3:15 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.9 7.1 7.6 8.5 7.9 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Interval #4 3:30 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.8 4.1 7.6 7.9 7.5 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Entire Run Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.6 4.6 7.4 8.8 7.8 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Interval #1 2:45 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.6 0.5 2.3 1.5 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Interval #2 3:00 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 13.4 0.7 2.6 2.3 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Interval #3 3:15 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.4 0.6 2.2 1.4 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 No Build School PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 2 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Interval #4 3:30 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 5.1 0.6 2.3 1.4 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Entire Run Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 11.6 0.6 2.4 1.7 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Interval #1 2:45 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.6 0.2 0.1 0.4 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Interval #2 3:00 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.7 0.5 0.3 1.8 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Interval #3 3:15 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.3 0.2 0.1 0.4 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Interval #4 3:30 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.6 0.2 0.1 0.3 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Entire Run Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 5.6 0.3 0.1 0.9 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Interval #1 2:45 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 4.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.4 0.3 0.1 0.4 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 No Build School PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 3 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Interval #2 3:00 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 3.6 0.1 0.0 0.5 Total Del/Veh (s) 13.5 0.5 0.5 2.3 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Interval #3 3:15 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 8.2 0.3 0.2 0.6 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Interval #4 3:30 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 4.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.6 0.4 0.1 0.5 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Entire Run Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.3 Total Del/Veh (s) 11.7 0.4 0.3 1.1 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Interval #1 2:45 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.3 4.5 0.8 0.9 1.2 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Interval #2 3:00 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 11.0 5.7 0.9 1.2 1.7 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Interval #3 3:15 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 8.8 5.0 0.8 0.8 1.3 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Interval #4 3:30 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 8.8 4.0 0.9 0.9 1.3 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 No Build School PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 4 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Entire Run Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 9.1 4.7 0.9 1.0 1.4 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Interval #1 2:45 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 5.3 5.1 0.7 1.1 1.3 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Interval #2 3:00 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.2 6.1 0.8 1.0 1.4 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Interval #3 3:15 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 5.6 4.7 0.5 0.9 1.0 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Interval #4 3:30 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.8 6.6 0.5 0.8 1.1 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Entire Run Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.9 5.5 0.7 1.0 1.2 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Interval #1 2:45 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.8 3.9 5.2 4.1 4.3 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Interval #2 3:00 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.4 3.9 5.5 4.2 4.4 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 No Build School PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 5 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Interval #3 3:15 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.6 3.4 5.7 4.0 4.4 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Interval #4 3:30 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.3 3.4 4.9 4.3 4.1 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Entire Run Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.5 3.7 5.5 4.2 4.4 Total Network Performance By Interval Interval Start 2:45 3:00 3:15 3:30 All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.4 Total Del/Veh (s) 11.5 12.7 11.3 11.6 12.7 Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build School PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 6 Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, Interval #1 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 47 30 86 86 Average Queue (ft) 19 15 60 61 95th Queue (ft) 50 39 89 90 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, Interval #2 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 31 31 117 140 Average Queue (ft) 21 15 70 75 95th Queue (ft) 44 40 116 131 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, Interval #3 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 34 30 99 86 Average Queue (ft) 21 10 62 58 95th Queue (ft) 45 33 100 97 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build School PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 7 Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, Interval #4 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 40 31 105 88 Average Queue (ft) 21 12 69 58 95th Queue (ft) 47 36 112 85 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, All Intervals Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 48 31 134 148 Average Queue (ft) 21 13 66 63 95th Queue (ft) 47 37 106 104 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, Interval #1 Movement WB SB Directions Served LR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 62 14 Average Queue (ft) 20 2 95th Queue (ft) 64 21 Link Distance (ft) 538 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build School PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 8 Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, Interval #2 Movement WB NB SB Directions Served LR TR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 146 4 56 Average Queue (ft) 77 1 14 95th Queue (ft) 182 7 60 Link Distance (ft) 538 147 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, Interval #3 Movement WB SB Directions Served LR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 38 11 Average Queue (ft) 10 2 95th Queue (ft) 48 17 Link Distance (ft) 538 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, Interval #4 Movement WB SB Directions Served LR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 54 14 Average Queue (ft) 15 4 95th Queue (ft) 54 28 Link Distance (ft) 538 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build School PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 9 Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, All Intervals Movement WB NB SB Directions Served LR TR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 146 4 71 Average Queue (ft) 30 0 5 95th Queue (ft) 108 3 35 Link Distance (ft) 538 147 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, Interval #1 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 31 Average Queue (ft) 24 95th Queue (ft) 42 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, Interval #2 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 115 Average Queue (ft) 58 95th Queue (ft) 106 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build School PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 10 Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, Interval #3 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 40 Average Queue (ft) 25 95th Queue (ft) 48 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, Interval #4 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 35 Average Queue (ft) 21 95th Queue (ft) 44 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, All Intervals Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 115 Average Queue (ft) 32 95th Queue (ft) 71 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build School PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 11 Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, Interval #1 Movement WB WB SB Directions Served L R L Maximum Queue (ft) 25 4 6 Average Queue (ft) 12 1 1 95th Queue (ft) 32 6 9 Link Distance (ft) 529 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, Interval #2 Movement WB WB NB SB Directions Served L R R L Maximum Queue (ft) 82 46 12 31 Average Queue (ft) 44 11 2 17 95th Queue (ft) 80 41 14 42 Link Distance (ft) 529 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 225 Storage Blk Time (%) 11 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, Interval #3 Movement WB WB SB Directions Served L R L Maximum Queue (ft) 44 8 25 Average Queue (ft) 19 1 4 95th Queue (ft) 48 8 22 Link Distance (ft) 529 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 Storage Blk Time (%) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build School PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 12 Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, Interval #4 Movement WB WB SB Directions Served L R L Maximum Queue (ft) 25 4 6 Average Queue (ft) 14 1 1 95th Queue (ft) 33 6 10 Link Distance (ft) 529 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, All Intervals Movement WB WB NB SB Directions Served L R R L Maximum Queue (ft) 82 46 12 31 Average Queue (ft) 22 3 0 6 95th Queue (ft) 57 21 6 26 Link Distance (ft) 529 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 225 Storage Blk Time (%) 3 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, Interval #1 Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 31 44 17 5 32 28 Average Queue (ft) 14 24 3 1 8 5 95th Queue (ft) 39 50 17 8 30 25 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 862 444 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build School PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 13 Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, Interval #2 Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 59 42 10 5 44 27 Average Queue (ft) 24 22 3 1 19 4 95th Queue (ft) 60 50 17 8 49 25 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 862 444 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, Interval #3 Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 38 35 27 5 22 20 Average Queue (ft) 17 16 7 1 8 3 95th Queue (ft) 43 42 25 11 28 22 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 862 444 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, Interval #4 Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 35 31 10 14 35 21 Average Queue (ft) 18 19 1 2 11 3 95th Queue (ft) 43 43 11 16 36 20 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 862 444 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build School PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 14 Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, All Intervals Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 59 47 27 24 49 51 Average Queue (ft) 18 20 4 1 11 4 95th Queue (ft) 47 47 18 11 37 23 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 862 444 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, Interval #1 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L L Maximum Queue (ft) 31 36 5 11 Average Queue (ft) 21 15 1 2 95th Queue (ft) 44 42 8 12 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, Interval #2 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L L Maximum Queue (ft) 49 31 16 25 Average Queue (ft) 28 17 4 7 95th Queue (ft) 52 41 19 26 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build School PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 15 Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, Interval #3 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L L Maximum Queue (ft) 31 35 16 21 Average Queue (ft) 17 14 4 3 95th Queue (ft) 42 41 18 16 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, Interval #4 Movement EB WB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 44 31 10 6 Average Queue (ft) 19 9 1 1 95th Queue (ft) 48 32 11 9 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 862 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, All Intervals Movement EB WB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 49 40 22 27 6 Average Queue (ft) 21 14 2 3 0 95th Queue (ft) 48 40 13 17 4 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 862 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build School PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 16 Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, Interval #1 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 40 51 48 28 Average Queue (ft) 9 16 13 6 95th Queue (ft) 36 60 46 31 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, Interval #2 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 34 41 49 44 Average Queue (ft) 10 18 21 13 95th Queue (ft) 39 46 52 43 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, Interval #3 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 31 34 58 42 Average Queue (ft) 8 11 22 11 95th Queue (ft) 31 36 59 42 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build School PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 17 Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, Interval #4 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 51 44 34 53 Average Queue (ft) 11 16 9 19 95th Queue (ft) 40 45 31 55 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, All Intervals Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 60 61 61 65 Average Queue (ft) 10 15 16 12 95th Queue (ft) 37 48 49 44 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #1: 0 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #2: 2 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #3: 0 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #4: 0 Network wide Queuing Penalty, All Intervals: 1 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 No Build PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 1 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Interval #1 4:00 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.3 5.9 6.2 7.1 6.5 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Interval #2 4:15 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 5.2 5.4 6.4 8.3 7.3 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Interval #3 4:30 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.3 4.4 6.5 7.5 6.8 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Interval #4 4:45 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 5.1 5.1 6.7 7.8 7.1 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Entire Run Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.2 5.1 6.6 7.8 7.0 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Interval #1 4:00 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.8 0.4 2.2 1.3 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Interval #2 4:15 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.5 0.4 2.2 1.5 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Interval #3 4:30 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 5.1 0.5 2.2 1.4 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 No Build PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 2 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Interval #4 4:45 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.0 0.5 2.2 1.4 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Entire Run Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.2 0.5 2.2 1.4 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Interval #1 4:00 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 2.9 0.1 0.0 0.1 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Interval #2 4:15 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Interval #3 4:30 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.2 0.2 0.0 0.2 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Interval #4 4:45 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.8 0.2 0.0 0.2 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Entire Run Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.4 0.2 0.0 0.2 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Interval #1 4:00 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.7 0.3 0.1 0.3 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 No Build PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 3 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Interval #2 4:15 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 8.1 0.3 0.1 0.4 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Interval #3 4:30 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.5 0.3 0.2 0.4 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Interval #4 4:45 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 3.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 11.8 0.4 0.1 0.7 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Entire Run Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 8.8 0.3 0.1 0.4 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Interval #1 4:00 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.1 3.7 0.6 0.6 0.9 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Interval #2 4:15 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 11.8 4.1 0.7 0.7 1.2 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Interval #3 4:30 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 9.1 4.6 0.7 0.7 1.2 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Interval #4 4:45 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.8 3.1 0.7 0.7 0.9 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 No Build PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 4 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Entire Run Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 8.7 3.9 0.7 0.7 1.1 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Interval #1 4:00 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.2 7.3 0.5 0.8 0.9 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Interval #2 4:15 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.9 3.0 0.6 0.9 1.0 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Interval #3 4:30 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 8.8 4.2 0.6 0.8 0.9 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Interval #4 4:45 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.0 7.4 0.6 0.8 0.9 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Entire Run Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.4 5.2 0.6 0.8 0.9 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Interval #1 4:00 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.6 3.7 4.9 4.0 4.1 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Interval #2 4:15 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.4 3.9 5.1 4.4 4.4 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 No Build PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 5 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Interval #3 4:30 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.1 4.0 4.6 4.4 4.3 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Interval #4 4:45 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.6 3.8 4.9 4.3 4.2 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Entire Run Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.9 3.9 4.9 4.3 4.3 Total Network Performance By Interval Interval Start 4:00 4:15 4:30 4:45 All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 Total Del/Veh (s) 10.8 12.4 11.5 11.7 12.4 Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 6 Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, Interval #1 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 31 34 68 64 Average Queue (ft) 17 15 52 49 95th Queue (ft) 41 41 76 73 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, Interval #2 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 35 31 70 100 Average Queue (ft) 19 18 55 66 95th Queue (ft) 45 42 74 98 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, Interval #3 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 35 31 73 79 Average Queue (ft) 16 16 54 54 95th Queue (ft) 42 41 78 79 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 7 Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, Interval #4 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 31 31 85 88 Average Queue (ft) 18 10 59 56 95th Queue (ft) 42 34 91 87 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, All Intervals Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 40 34 97 102 Average Queue (ft) 17 15 55 56 95th Queue (ft) 42 40 81 87 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, Interval #1 Movement WB SB Directions Served LR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 24 18 Average Queue (ft) 7 3 95th Queue (ft) 27 19 Link Distance (ft) 538 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 8 Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, Interval #2 Movement WB SB Directions Served LR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 23 18 Average Queue (ft) 5 3 95th Queue (ft) 23 17 Link Distance (ft) 538 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, Interval #3 Movement WB SB Directions Served LR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 24 6 Average Queue (ft) 6 1 95th Queue (ft) 26 9 Link Distance (ft) 538 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, Interval #4 Movement WB SB Directions Served LR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 17 6 Average Queue (ft) 2 2 95th Queue (ft) 16 12 Link Distance (ft) 538 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 9 Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, All Intervals Movement WB SB Directions Served LR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 30 24 Average Queue (ft) 5 2 95th Queue (ft) 23 15 Link Distance (ft) 538 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, Interval #1 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 31 Average Queue (ft) 13 95th Queue (ft) 38 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, Interval #2 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 35 Average Queue (ft) 12 95th Queue (ft) 38 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 10 Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, Interval #3 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 31 Average Queue (ft) 12 95th Queue (ft) 36 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, Interval #4 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 30 Average Queue (ft) 9 95th Queue (ft) 32 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, All Intervals Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 36 Average Queue (ft) 12 95th Queue (ft) 36 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 11 Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, Interval #1 Movement WB WB SB Directions Served L R L Maximum Queue (ft) 25 4 12 Average Queue (ft) 6 1 1 95th Queue (ft) 22 6 9 Link Distance (ft) 529 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, Interval #2 Movement WB WB SB Directions Served L R L Maximum Queue (ft) 25 8 24 Average Queue (ft) 13 1 3 95th Queue (ft) 33 8 19 Link Distance (ft) 529 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, Interval #3 Movement WB WB SB Directions Served L R L Maximum Queue (ft) 25 3 25 Average Queue (ft) 9 0 4 95th Queue (ft) 29 5 22 Link Distance (ft) 529 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 12 Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, Interval #4 Movement WB WB SB Directions Served L R L Maximum Queue (ft) 30 19 24 Average Queue (ft) 13 3 4 95th Queue (ft) 38 19 21 Link Distance (ft) 529 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 Storage Blk Time (%) 2 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, All Intervals Movement WB WB SB Directions Served L R L Maximum Queue (ft) 31 23 31 Average Queue (ft) 10 1 3 95th Queue (ft) 31 11 18 Link Distance (ft) 529 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, Interval #1 Movement EB WB NB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L Maximum Queue (ft) 35 31 15 5 16 Average Queue (ft) 19 15 2 1 7 95th Queue (ft) 45 40 14 8 27 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 862 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 13 Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, Interval #2 Movement EB WB NB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L Maximum Queue (ft) 43 35 16 9 27 Average Queue (ft) 21 14 3 1 14 95th Queue (ft) 49 40 17 14 35 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 862 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, Interval #3 Movement EB WB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 39 39 16 31 15 Average Queue (ft) 20 19 2 11 2 95th Queue (ft) 50 45 15 35 17 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 444 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, Interval #4 Movement EB WB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 30 31 15 26 5 Average Queue (ft) 13 15 3 8 1 95th Queue (ft) 38 40 16 29 10 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 444 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 14 Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, All Intervals Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 48 44 27 14 35 21 Average Queue (ft) 18 16 3 1 10 1 95th Queue (ft) 46 42 15 8 32 10 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 862 444 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, Interval #1 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L L Maximum Queue (ft) 31 35 10 21 Average Queue (ft) 13 11 1 5 95th Queue (ft) 37 37 11 21 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, Interval #2 Movement EB WB NB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L Maximum Queue (ft) 36 25 10 5 21 Average Queue (ft) 15 8 1 1 4 95th Queue (ft) 42 30 8 7 21 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 15 Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, Interval #3 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L L Maximum Queue (ft) 35 31 15 15 Average Queue (ft) 12 11 1 4 95th Queue (ft) 38 36 11 18 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, Interval #4 Movement EB WB NB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L Maximum Queue (ft) 31 31 3 10 10 Average Queue (ft) 15 8 0 1 1 95th Queue (ft) 40 30 4 11 11 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, All Intervals Movement EB WB NB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L Maximum Queue (ft) 40 35 26 15 26 Average Queue (ft) 14 10 1 1 4 95th Queue (ft) 40 33 9 6 18 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 16 Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, Interval #1 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 24 42 25 47 Average Queue (ft) 9 16 13 12 95th Queue (ft) 31 46 37 46 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, Interval #2 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 39 53 40 57 Average Queue (ft) 12 19 19 17 95th Queue (ft) 40 57 47 55 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, Interval #3 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 31 53 43 49 Average Queue (ft) 13 20 13 19 95th Queue (ft) 38 56 44 56 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 No Build PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 17 Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, Interval #4 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 31 45 38 53 Average Queue (ft) 6 20 11 17 95th Queue (ft) 25 50 40 49 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, All Intervals Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 39 67 58 77 Average Queue (ft) 10 19 14 16 95th Queue (ft) 34 53 42 52 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #1: 0 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #2: 0 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #3: 0 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #4: 0 Network wide Queuing Penalty, All Intervals: 0 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 Build AM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 1 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Interval #1 7:45 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.2 4.9 8.0 7.3 7.4 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Interval #2 8:00 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.4 6.8 9.2 7.8 8.3 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Interval #3 8:15 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.2 6.0 7.9 7.3 7.3 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Interval #4 8:30 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.0 4.9 7.5 6.7 6.9 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Entire Run Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.3 5.4 8.3 7.6 7.6 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Interval #1 7:45 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.5 0.8 2.3 1.4 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Interval #2 8:00 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 17.9 1.4 3.7 2.6 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Interval #3 8:15 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 10.3 0.8 2.3 1.4 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 Build AM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 2 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Interval #4 8:30 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.2 0.8 2.0 1.3 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Entire Run Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 15.6 1.0 2.7 1.8 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Interval #1 7:45 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.3 0.3 0.2 0.8 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Interval #2 8:00 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 9.1 0.9 0.5 3.4 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Interval #3 8:15 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.8 0.4 0.2 1.1 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Interval #4 8:30 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.0 0.4 0.1 1.0 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Entire Run Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.9 0.5 0.3 1.9 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Interval #1 7:45 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.4 0.5 1.1 1.3 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 Build AM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 3 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Interval #2 8:00 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 3.6 0.1 0.1 0.6 Total Del/Veh (s) 35.5 1.0 4.7 7.7 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Interval #3 8:15 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.3 Total Del/Veh (s) 18.6 0.5 1.6 2.8 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Interval #4 8:30 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.4 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.3 0.4 1.1 1.2 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Entire Run Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.4 Total Del/Veh (s) 25.1 0.7 2.5 4.0 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Interval #1 7:45 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 9.9 5.2 1.1 0.7 1.8 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Interval #2 8:00 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 14.9 8.9 1.0 1.0 2.0 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Interval #3 8:15 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 8.5 5.9 0.9 0.9 1.6 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Interval #4 8:30 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 8.5 5.6 0.8 0.7 1.7 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 Build AM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 4 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Entire Run Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 10.6 6.5 1.0 0.9 1.8 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Interval #1 7:45 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.8 4.3 0.9 0.6 1.2 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Interval #2 8:00 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.1 5.0 1.0 0.6 1.2 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Interval #3 8:15 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.9 3.5 0.8 0.6 1.1 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Interval #4 8:30 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.4 4.2 0.6 0.4 0.9 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Entire Run Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.8 4.5 0.8 0.5 1.1 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Interval #1 7:45 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.1 3.4 5.6 3.5 4.2 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Interval #2 8:00 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.8 4.6 6.2 3.6 4.7 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 Build AM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 5 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Interval #3 8:15 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.6 3.9 5.2 3.9 4.3 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Interval #4 8:30 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.2 3.3 5.4 3.4 4.0 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Entire Run Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.4 3.9 5.7 3.7 4.4 Total Network Performance By Interval Interval Start 7:45 8:00 8:15 8:30 All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 0.7 0.4 0.5 0.5 Total Del/Veh (s) 11.8 17.0 12.1 11.0 14.5 Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build AM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 6 Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, Interval #1 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 50 40 119 82 Average Queue (ft) 29 23 80 50 95th Queue (ft) 55 48 125 81 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, Interval #2 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 52 40 141 82 Average Queue (ft) 32 21 94 54 95th Queue (ft) 51 48 141 83 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, Interval #3 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 56 47 122 79 Average Queue (ft) 33 23 73 53 95th Queue (ft) 55 55 117 79 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build AM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 7 Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, Interval #4 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 54 42 110 62 Average Queue (ft) 32 19 73 46 95th Queue (ft) 56 46 116 69 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, All Intervals Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 70 52 147 95 Average Queue (ft) 32 21 80 51 95th Queue (ft) 54 50 127 79 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, Interval #1 Movement WB NB SB Directions Served LR TR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 34 32 45 Average Queue (ft) 6 6 8 95th Queue (ft) 36 35 58 Link Distance (ft) 538 147 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build AM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 8 Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, Interval #2 Movement WB NB SB Directions Served LR TR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 86 69 134 Average Queue (ft) 43 13 42 95th Queue (ft) 96 73 124 Link Distance (ft) 538 147 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, Interval #3 Movement WB NB SB Directions Served LR TR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 40 6 71 Average Queue (ft) 12 1 16 95th Queue (ft) 52 9 64 Link Distance (ft) 538 147 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, Interval #4 Movement WB NB SB Directions Served LR TR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 63 22 48 Average Queue (ft) 17 4 10 95th Queue (ft) 60 25 46 Link Distance (ft) 538 147 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build AM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 9 Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, All Intervals Movement WB NB SB Directions Served LR TR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 87 91 134 Average Queue (ft) 19 6 19 95th Queue (ft) 68 42 80 Link Distance (ft) 538 147 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, Interval #1 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 64 Average Queue (ft) 39 95th Queue (ft) 62 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, Interval #2 Movement WB NB Directions Served LR T Maximum Queue (ft) 108 5 Average Queue (ft) 79 1 95th Queue (ft) 124 8 Link Distance (ft) 534 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build AM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 10 Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, Interval #3 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 85 Average Queue (ft) 46 95th Queue (ft) 85 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, Interval #4 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 61 Average Queue (ft) 37 95th Queue (ft) 57 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, All Intervals Movement WB NB Directions Served LR T Maximum Queue (ft) 116 5 Average Queue (ft) 50 0 95th Queue (ft) 94 4 Link Distance (ft) 534 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build AM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 11 Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, Interval #1 Movement WB WB NB SB Directions Served L R R L Maximum Queue (ft) 43 15 4 39 Average Queue (ft) 25 3 1 22 95th Queue (ft) 44 19 6 48 Link Distance (ft) 529 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 225 Storage Blk Time (%) 2 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, Interval #2 Movement WB WB NB SB Directions Served L R R L Maximum Queue (ft) 108 172 40 103 Average Queue (ft) 77 54 14 62 95th Queue (ft) 121 177 44 110 Link Distance (ft) 529 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 225 Storage Blk Time (%) 50 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 4 1 Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, Interval #3 Movement WB WB NB NB SB Directions Served L R T R L Maximum Queue (ft) 87 66 9 28 64 Average Queue (ft) 36 10 1 4 32 95th Queue (ft) 80 81 10 25 69 Link Distance (ft) 529 444 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 225 Storage Blk Time (%) 8 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build AM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 12 Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, Interval #4 Movement WB WB NB SB Directions Served L R R L Maximum Queue (ft) 45 13 9 47 Average Queue (ft) 24 3 2 19 95th Queue (ft) 50 16 12 51 Link Distance (ft) 529 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 225 Storage Blk Time (%) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, All Intervals Movement WB WB NB NB SB Directions Served L R T R L Maximum Queue (ft) 108 193 9 52 103 Average Queue (ft) 40 18 0 5 34 95th Queue (ft) 91 97 5 26 80 Link Distance (ft) 529 444 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 225 Storage Blk Time (%) 15 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, Interval #1 Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 48 50 6 22 21 16 Average Queue (ft) 28 26 1 3 4 2 95th Queue (ft) 58 52 8 25 20 19 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 862 444 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build AM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 13 Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, Interval #2 Movement EB WB NB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L Maximum Queue (ft) 57 44 10 24 21 Average Queue (ft) 35 25 1 4 5 95th Queue (ft) 67 56 11 21 21 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 862 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, Interval #3 Movement EB WB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 46 46 10 33 19 Average Queue (ft) 26 26 1 8 3 95th Queue (ft) 56 51 11 35 23 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 444 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, Interval #4 Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 55 46 10 14 21 14 Average Queue (ft) 35 23 1 3 3 2 95th Queue (ft) 65 51 8 23 17 13 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 862 444 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build AM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 14 Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, All Intervals Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 74 65 16 45 39 34 Average Queue (ft) 31 25 1 2 5 2 95th Queue (ft) 62 53 10 20 24 16 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 862 444 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, Interval #1 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR TR L Maximum Queue (ft) 36 40 14 16 Average Queue (ft) 20 16 2 4 95th Queue (ft) 45 46 21 19 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, Interval #2 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR TR L Maximum Queue (ft) 40 48 5 22 Average Queue (ft) 19 23 1 5 95th Queue (ft) 46 52 7 22 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build AM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 15 Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, Interval #3 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L L Maximum Queue (ft) 39 44 5 5 Average Queue (ft) 23 20 1 1 95th Queue (ft) 51 50 8 8 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, Interval #4 Movement EB WB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L Maximum Queue (ft) 36 35 16 Average Queue (ft) 22 18 3 95th Queue (ft) 47 43 16 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, All Intervals Movement EB WB NB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L Maximum Queue (ft) 47 63 5 18 27 Average Queue (ft) 21 19 0 1 3 95th Queue (ft) 47 48 4 11 17 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build AM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 16 Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, Interval #1 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 43 50 60 12 Average Queue (ft) 9 15 22 2 95th Queue (ft) 36 45 64 13 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, Interval #2 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 48 84 63 24 Average Queue (ft) 18 27 29 4 95th Queue (ft) 51 76 64 21 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, Interval #3 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 49 43 46 32 Average Queue (ft) 13 15 18 8 95th Queue (ft) 52 45 56 33 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build AM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 17 Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, Interval #4 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 38 35 55 24 Average Queue (ft) 6 15 15 8 95th Queue (ft) 34 45 55 29 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, All Intervals Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 66 93 84 39 Average Queue (ft) 11 18 21 5 95th Queue (ft) 44 55 61 25 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #1: 0 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #2: 10 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #3: 1 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #4: 0 Network wide Queuing Penalty, All Intervals: 3 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 Build School PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 1 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Interval #1 2:45 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.6 5.3 7.5 8.9 8.0 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Interval #2 3:00 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 5.2 4.0 8.3 9.3 8.5 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Interval #3 3:15 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 5.7 5.3 8.0 7.8 7.8 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Interval #4 3:30 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.7 4.4 7.7 7.9 7.6 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Entire Run Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.7 4.3 8.0 8.8 8.1 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Interval #1 2:45 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.9 0.7 2.4 1.6 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Interval #2 3:00 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 12.7 0.9 3.5 2.6 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Interval #3 3:15 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 8.2 0.6 2.3 1.6 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 Build School PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 2 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Interval #4 3:30 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 10.0 0.7 2.3 1.7 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Entire Run Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 10.9 0.7 2.7 1.9 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Interval #1 2:45 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.4 0.3 0.2 0.6 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Interval #2 3:00 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.5 0.7 0.4 2.1 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Interval #3 3:15 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.0 0.2 0.1 0.5 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Interval #4 3:30 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.0 0.3 0.1 0.5 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Entire Run Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 5.6 0.4 0.2 1.1 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Interval #1 2:45 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.0 0.3 0.2 0.6 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 Build School PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 3 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Interval #2 3:00 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 3.5 0.1 0.0 0.7 Total Del/Veh (s) 15.2 0.6 1.0 3.3 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Interval #3 3:15 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 8.0 0.3 0.2 0.8 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Interval #4 3:30 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 3.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 5.9 0.3 0.2 0.6 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Entire Run Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.4 Total Del/Veh (s) 12.4 0.4 0.4 1.6 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Interval #1 2:45 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.0 4.8 0.8 0.9 1.2 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Interval #2 3:00 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 8.9 5.7 1.1 1.0 1.5 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Interval #3 3:15 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.4 4.4 0.7 0.8 1.2 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Interval #4 3:30 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.6 3.4 0.8 0.9 1.1 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 Build School PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 4 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Entire Run Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 8.0 4.6 0.9 0.9 1.3 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Interval #1 2:45 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.2 6.1 0.5 0.9 1.1 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Interval #2 3:00 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.7 5.0 0.9 1.0 1.4 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Interval #3 3:15 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 5.6 4.8 0.5 0.8 1.1 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Interval #4 3:30 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 5.3 4.6 0.9 0.9 1.2 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Entire Run Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.6 5.1 0.7 0.9 1.2 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Interval #1 2:45 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.5 3.7 5.0 4.2 4.3 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Interval #2 3:00 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.3 3.7 5.9 4.1 4.5 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 Build School PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 5 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Interval #3 3:15 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.3 3.1 4.5 4.0 3.9 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Interval #4 3:30 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.5 3.4 5.4 4.0 4.1 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Entire Run Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.7 3.6 5.5 4.1 4.3 Total Network Performance By Interval Interval Start 2:45 3:00 3:15 3:30 All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.4 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.5 Total Del/Veh (s) 11.6 13.4 10.9 11.6 12.8 Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build School PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 6 Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, Interval #1 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 34 29 104 103 Average Queue (ft) 17 13 69 64 95th Queue (ft) 42 40 119 103 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, Interval #2 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 35 31 125 105 Average Queue (ft) 21 18 79 71 95th Queue (ft) 45 41 124 111 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, Interval #3 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 43 30 111 78 Average Queue (ft) 19 12 63 60 95th Queue (ft) 48 36 113 86 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build School PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 7 Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, Interval #4 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 39 31 144 76 Average Queue (ft) 20 14 78 55 95th Queue (ft) 46 39 140 80 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, All Intervals Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 48 36 159 120 Average Queue (ft) 19 14 72 62 95th Queue (ft) 46 39 126 97 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, Interval #1 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 64 Average Queue (ft) 24 95th Queue (ft) 70 Link Distance (ft) 538 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build School PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 8 Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, Interval #2 Movement WB NB SB Directions Served LR TR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 108 6 102 Average Queue (ft) 63 0 24 95th Queue (ft) 119 0 101 Link Distance (ft) 538 147 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, Interval #3 Movement WB NB Directions Served LR TR Maximum Queue (ft) 64 15 Average Queue (ft) 24 3 95th Queue (ft) 70 19 Link Distance (ft) 538 147 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, Interval #4 Movement WB NB SB Directions Served LR TR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 78 15 10 Average Queue (ft) 33 3 1 95th Queue (ft) 82 19 15 Link Distance (ft) 538 147 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build School PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 9 Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, All Intervals Movement WB NB SB Directions Served LR TR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 108 21 102 Average Queue (ft) 36 1 6 95th Queue (ft) 92 13 49 Link Distance (ft) 538 147 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, Interval #1 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 56 Average Queue (ft) 34 95th Queue (ft) 56 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, Interval #2 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 104 Average Queue (ft) 66 95th Queue (ft) 108 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build School PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 10 Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, Interval #3 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 43 Average Queue (ft) 25 95th Queue (ft) 50 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, Interval #4 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 44 Average Queue (ft) 27 95th Queue (ft) 50 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, All Intervals Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 104 Average Queue (ft) 38 95th Queue (ft) 78 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build School PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 11 Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, Interval #1 Movement WB WB NB SB Directions Served L R R L Maximum Queue (ft) 32 13 6 19 Average Queue (ft) 16 2 1 5 95th Queue (ft) 38 14 9 23 Link Distance (ft) 529 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 225 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, Interval #2 Movement WB WB NB SB Directions Served L R R L Maximum Queue (ft) 73 66 4 48 Average Queue (ft) 49 25 1 26 95th Queue (ft) 87 77 7 52 Link Distance (ft) 529 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 225 Storage Blk Time (%) 16 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 1 Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, Interval #3 Movement WB WB NB SB Directions Served L R R L Maximum Queue (ft) 58 23 6 34 Average Queue (ft) 24 5 1 4 95th Queue (ft) 56 24 9 23 Link Distance (ft) 529 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 225 Storage Blk Time (%) 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build School PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 12 Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, Interval #4 Movement WB WB NB SB Directions Served L R R L Maximum Queue (ft) 25 8 6 18 Average Queue (ft) 16 1 1 6 95th Queue (ft) 35 8 9 26 Link Distance (ft) 529 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 225 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, All Intervals Movement WB WB NB SB Directions Served L R R L Maximum Queue (ft) 81 66 18 48 Average Queue (ft) 26 8 1 10 95th Queue (ft) 63 41 9 36 Link Distance (ft) 529 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 225 Storage Blk Time (%) 5 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, Interval #1 Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 31 31 15 20 27 6 Average Queue (ft) 14 16 2 3 14 1 95th Queue (ft) 39 41 14 19 36 9 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 862 444 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build School PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 13 Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, Interval #2 Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 54 36 20 9 28 21 Average Queue (ft) 23 20 4 0 15 4 95th Queue (ft) 52 47 17 0 37 21 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 862 444 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, Interval #3 Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 52 42 16 5 31 12 Average Queue (ft) 24 20 2 1 7 3 95th Queue (ft) 56 49 14 8 29 19 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 862 444 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, Interval #4 Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 34 44 15 5 31 38 Average Queue (ft) 15 21 3 1 10 5 95th Queue (ft) 41 52 16 7 32 24 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 862 444 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build School PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 14 Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, All Intervals Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 67 55 26 24 35 41 Average Queue (ft) 19 19 3 1 12 3 95th Queue (ft) 48 47 15 11 34 19 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 862 444 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, Interval #1 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L L Maximum Queue (ft) 31 31 5 21 Average Queue (ft) 23 14 1 5 95th Queue (ft) 45 39 8 21 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, Interval #2 Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 45 40 10 5 16 30 Average Queue (ft) 28 18 1 1 4 4 95th Queue (ft) 57 46 11 7 18 34 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 600 862 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build School PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 15 Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, Interval #3 Movement EB WB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 44 31 10 16 6 Average Queue (ft) 23 13 1 2 1 95th Queue (ft) 50 38 15 14 8 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 600 862 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, Interval #4 Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 31 31 6 14 10 5 Average Queue (ft) 16 11 1 2 1 1 95th Queue (ft) 41 35 8 13 11 8 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 600 862 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, All Intervals Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 54 40 11 24 27 35 Average Queue (ft) 23 14 1 1 3 1 95th Queue (ft) 49 40 8 10 17 17 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 600 862 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build School PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 16 Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, Interval #1 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 25 43 34 48 Average Queue (ft) 7 15 16 18 95th Queue (ft) 28 44 41 54 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, Interval #2 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 41 45 54 34 Average Queue (ft) 14 19 27 9 95th Queue (ft) 43 50 55 34 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, Interval #3 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 31 29 35 53 Average Queue (ft) 7 7 13 9 95th Queue (ft) 28 27 38 36 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build School PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 17 Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, Interval #4 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 35 40 51 34 Average Queue (ft) 10 19 22 6 95th Queue (ft) 36 50 55 33 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, All Intervals Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 45 54 58 66 Average Queue (ft) 10 15 19 11 95th Queue (ft) 35 44 49 41 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #1: 0 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #2: 6 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #3: 1 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #4: 1 Network wide Queuing Penalty, All Intervals: 2 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 Build PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 1 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Interval #1 4:00 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.0 5.9 6.5 7.2 6.7 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Interval #2 4:15 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.0 5.4 6.4 7.7 6.9 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Interval #3 4:30 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.1 4.7 6.3 7.3 6.7 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Interval #4 4:45 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.3 5.4 6.6 7.8 7.0 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S Performance by approach Entire Run Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.3 5.5 6.5 7.6 6.9 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Interval #1 4:00 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 0.4 2.2 1.3 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Interval #2 4:15 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 0.4 2.2 1.4 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Interval #3 4:30 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.2 0.4 2.2 1.4 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 Build PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 2 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Interval #4 4:45 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.4 0.4 2.2 1.4 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access Performance by approach Entire Run Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 5.0 0.4 2.2 1.4 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Interval #1 4:00 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.3 0.1 0.0 0.2 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Interval #2 4:15 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.0 0.2 0.1 0.2 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Interval #3 4:30 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 2.8 0.2 0.0 0.2 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Interval #4 4:45 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.1 0.2 0.0 0.2 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access Performance by approach Entire Run Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Interval #1 4:00 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 4.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.7 0.3 0.1 0.4 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 Build PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 3 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Interval #2 4:15 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 4.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 10.2 0.4 0.1 0.6 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Interval #3 4:30 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 8.7 0.3 0.2 0.4 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Interval #4 4:45 Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.6 0.4 0.2 0.4 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access Performance by approach Entire Run Approach WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 8.0 0.3 0.1 0.5 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Interval #1 4:00 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.9 3.8 0.6 0.7 1.1 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Interval #2 4:15 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 10.2 3.9 0.8 0.8 1.2 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Interval #3 4:30 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 8.2 3.3 0.6 0.6 0.9 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Interval #4 4:45 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.1 3.3 0.7 0.7 1.0 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 Build PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 4 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S Performance by approach Entire Run Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 8.6 3.7 0.7 0.7 1.1 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Interval #1 4:00 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 9.1 4.5 0.5 0.7 0.8 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Interval #2 4:15 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.4 4.8 0.6 0.9 1.0 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Interval #3 4:30 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.7 4.4 0.4 0.7 0.7 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Interval #4 4:45 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.6 3.4 0.6 0.8 0.8 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S Performance by approach Entire Run Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.4 4.1 0.5 0.8 0.9 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Interval #1 4:00 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.4 3.7 4.8 4.2 4.2 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Interval #2 4:15 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.6 4.4 5.1 4.2 4.4 SimTraffic Performance Report 2030 Build PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 5 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Interval #3 4:30 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.3 3.6 4.5 4.0 4.0 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Interval #4 4:45 Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.6 3.7 5.4 4.2 4.3 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S Performance by approach Entire Run Approach EB WB NB SB All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.2 4.3 Total Network Performance By Interval Interval Start 4:00 4:15 4:30 4:45 All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Total Del/Veh (s) 11.1 11.6 10.7 11.4 12.0 Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 6 Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, Interval #1 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 30 24 68 69 Average Queue (ft) 14 11 55 53 95th Queue (ft) 38 36 76 72 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, Interval #2 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 30 35 69 96 Average Queue (ft) 19 15 53 60 95th Queue (ft) 42 42 75 92 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, Interval #3 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 30 30 70 84 Average Queue (ft) 13 16 52 52 95th Queue (ft) 37 41 74 82 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 7 Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, Interval #4 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 31 31 72 85 Average Queue (ft) 15 15 54 60 95th Queue (ft) 39 40 75 91 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 5: Hadley Ave S & 90th St S, All Intervals Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 31 35 86 104 Average Queue (ft) 15 14 53 56 95th Queue (ft) 40 40 75 85 Link Distance (ft) 542 542 159 1014 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, Interval #1 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 12 Average Queue (ft) 1 95th Queue (ft) 8 Link Distance (ft) 538 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 8 Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, Interval #2 Movement WB SB Directions Served LR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 18 6 Average Queue (ft) 3 1 95th Queue (ft) 17 9 Link Distance (ft) 538 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, Interval #3 Movement WB SB Directions Served LR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 24 6 Average Queue (ft) 5 0 95th Queue (ft) 24 0 Link Distance (ft) 538 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, Interval #4 Movement WB SB Directions Served LR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 30 6 Average Queue (ft) 8 2 95th Queue (ft) 29 14 Link Distance (ft) 538 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 9 Intersection: 10: Hadley Ave S & North Access, All Intervals Movement WB SB Directions Served LR LT Maximum Queue (ft) 30 12 Average Queue (ft) 4 1 95th Queue (ft) 21 8 Link Distance (ft) 538 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, Interval #1 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 31 Average Queue (ft) 15 95th Queue (ft) 39 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, Interval #2 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 30 Average Queue (ft) 15 95th Queue (ft) 38 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 10 Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, Interval #3 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 30 Average Queue (ft) 16 95th Queue (ft) 39 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, Interval #4 Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 35 Average Queue (ft) 19 95th Queue (ft) 44 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 15: Hadley Ave S & Central Access, All Intervals Movement WB Directions Served LR Maximum Queue (ft) 36 Average Queue (ft) 16 95th Queue (ft) 41 Link Distance (ft) 534 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 11 Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, Interval #1 Movement WB WB SB Directions Served L R L Maximum Queue (ft) 25 4 19 Average Queue (ft) 11 1 3 95th Queue (ft) 31 9 17 Link Distance (ft) 529 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, Interval #2 Movement WB WB SB Directions Served L R L Maximum Queue (ft) 29 4 25 Average Queue (ft) 15 1 4 95th Queue (ft) 36 6 20 Link Distance (ft) 529 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, Interval #3 Movement WB WB NB SB Directions Served L R R L Maximum Queue (ft) 25 3 4 23 Average Queue (ft) 12 0 1 5 95th Queue (ft) 32 5 7 26 Link Distance (ft) 529 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 225 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 12 Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, Interval #4 Movement WB WB SB Directions Served L R L Maximum Queue (ft) 25 15 24 Average Queue (ft) 9 2 5 95th Queue (ft) 28 12 24 Link Distance (ft) 529 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 20: Hadley Ave S & South Access, All Intervals Movement WB WB NB SB Directions Served L R R L Maximum Queue (ft) 29 20 4 36 Average Queue (ft) 12 1 0 4 95th Queue (ft) 32 9 3 22 Link Distance (ft) 529 138 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 225 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, Interval #1 Movement EB WB NB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L Maximum Queue (ft) 33 36 16 5 36 Average Queue (ft) 16 17 5 1 14 95th Queue (ft) 44 44 21 8 40 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 862 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 13 Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, Interval #2 Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 43 38 22 5 44 6 Average Queue (ft) 21 22 7 1 12 1 95th Queue (ft) 53 50 25 7 41 9 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 862 444 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, Interval #3 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L L Maximum Queue (ft) 31 43 20 27 Average Queue (ft) 15 20 4 9 95th Queue (ft) 39 48 20 30 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, Interval #4 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L L Maximum Queue (ft) 35 44 10 27 Average Queue (ft) 14 23 1 11 95th Queue (ft) 40 53 11 32 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 14 Intersection: 25: Hadley Ave S & 92nd St S, All Intervals Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 47 60 27 10 52 6 Average Queue (ft) 16 21 4 0 11 0 95th Queue (ft) 45 49 20 5 36 4 Link Distance (ft) 511 514 862 444 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, Interval #1 Movement EB WB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 31 36 10 10 6 Average Queue (ft)9 8 2 1 1 95th Queue (ft) 33 32 14 11 8 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 862 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, Interval #2 Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 31 36 16 5 10 26 Average Queue (ft) 15 12 4 1 2 2 95th Queue (ft) 40 38 19 7 14 18 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 600 862 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 15 Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, Interval #3 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L L Maximum Queue (ft) 30 31 15 14 Average Queue (ft) 10 11 3 2 95th Queue (ft) 33 35 15 13 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, Interval #4 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L L Maximum Queue (ft) 31 24 22 21 Average Queue (ft)9 7 3 4 95th Queue (ft) 32 27 17 19 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 30: Hadley Ave S & 94th St S, All Intervals Movement EB WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LTR LTR L TR L TR Maximum Queue (ft) 31 40 27 5 26 32 Average Queue (ft) 11 9 3 0 2 1 95th Queue (ft) 35 33 16 4 14 10 Link Distance (ft) 489 512 600 862 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 16 Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, Interval #1 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 36 36 29 44 Average Queue (ft) 14 18 13 15 95th Queue (ft) 41 44 37 47 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, Interval #2 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 25 59 45 44 Average Queue (ft) 8 21 18 14 95th Queue (ft) 30 60 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, Interval #3 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 40 39 30 43 Average Queue (ft) 13 15 12 14 95th Queue (ft) 40 43 35 50 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2030 Build PM 06/02/2025 TC2 Page 17 Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, Interval #4 Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 19 34 39 44 Average Queue (ft) 5 9 15 15 95th Queue (ft) 25 35 44 48 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 35: Hadley Ave S & 95th St S, All Intervals Movement EB WB NB SB Directions Served LTR LTR LTR LTR Maximum Queue (ft) 40 64 50 65 Average Queue (ft) 10 16 14 14 95th Queue (ft) 35 47 41 47 Link Distance (ft) 942 818 846 600 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #1: 0 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #2: 0 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #3: 0 Network wide Queuing Penalty, Interval #4: 0 Network wide Queuing Penalty, All Intervals: 0 H:\COTT\25X139406000\1_Corres\C_To Others\2025-08-06\139406 Plan Review 2025-08-08 Traffic Comments.docx MEMORANDUM Date: 08/11/2025 To: Paul Sponholz, PE From: Bryan T. Nemeth, PE, PTOE Mike Boex, PE Subject: Pine Hill Elementary School Addition City of Cottage Grove, MN Project No.: 24X139406 This memo summarizes the review of traffic study documents submitted by Wold Architects and BKBM Engineers, dated 7/17/25 (received 7/25/25). Traffic Study Comments: 1. Pedestrian Crossings: Trail is provided along both sides of Hadley Avenue throughout the project area, however, there are no marked crossings of Hadley Avenue between 90th Street and 95th Street. It is understood that there have been requests from the public for another crossing location south of 90th Street. a. Page 12: Ped crossing at Hadley/92nd i. Considering the public comments, queue issues, and traffic increase concerns, would like the enhanced pedestrian crossing implemented at this time. 1. Recommend ADA compliant curb ramps on NW and NE corner be implemented with the project 2. Recommend marked and signed pedestrian crossing with RRFB at the north side crossing be implemented with the project ii. This would also be anticipated to reduce the number of students crossing further to the north. b. Page 14: Management strategies i. Recommendation above supports: “Promote and/or provide incentives to increase student use of the bus and alternative transportation modes” c. Page 14: This recommendation is consistent with “A pedestrian ramp improvement project at the Hadley Ave/92nd Street intersection should be considered….rectangular rapid flashing beacon (RRFB)…” Pedestrian volume and speed is considered to be acceptable by the city for an RRFB at this location. Pine Hill Elementary Addition Plan Review Page: 2 2. School access queues extending to impact Hadley. Considering the additional data and in recognition of the results provided, additional questions, concerns, and recommendations are identified by the city. a. Page 4: Internal School Queues.“Internal school queues / operations did not significantly impact the adjacent roadway network.” i. School identified that the entrance/exit configuration and procedures changed in the last year and it was indicated that this corrected the queues waiting on Hadley. This is something the city is still concerned about. Does the school have any additional information that the backups no longer occur? ii. What happens if the queues reoccur? Could the circulation be configured to handle more queue? b. Page 5: report mentions “No significant queues or operational issues with…..the northbound right turn lane at the South School Access”: Relates to above comment on Internal School Queues. Would like some additional ideas to reduce queues onto Hadley. c. Page 5: School PM Peak Hour observations (also mentioned in 2030 analysis on Page 9) i. Queue dissipation time of five minutes 1. This seems awfully quick considering the number of cars and students. Concern is with how this impacts the queue on Hadley. d. Page 6 and 7: Student increase and traffic distribution i. Lots of additional students and parents dropping off ii. Most new housing is to the south so most new trips are likely from the south 1. Was this taken into account as it seems like the new trips are 50/50 from north and south? Want to make sure we fully understand the backups/queues onto the city street. 2. Can the study provide documentation on the attendance area and projections for where most new trips are coming from? e. Page 12: Extension of right turn lane could be considered. i. Recommend extending the northbound right turn lane at the access into the site be implemented with the project. f. Page 14: Central School Access i. Management strategies 1. Recommendations in this section supports “Provide the ability to enter side via the Central School Access, particularly for the motorists who park on site and pick-up students in the “walk zone for parked cars”.” Pine Hill Elementary Addition Plan Review Page: 3 a. Except do not like idea of having parents “park” and then students walking in and out between cars in the lot. Safety concern. 2. “Investigate and/or implement additional strategies to improve overall efficiency of drop-off and pickup operations…” a. Agree on “Allow motorists to exit the lane once the drop- off/pick-up has occurred, while ensuring student safety is maintained.” This does occur at other schools around the region but students cannot be allowed to walk through this area to the parking lot. Most schools require students to only be able to walk with parents and direct them to a “safe crossing” preferably with a crossing guard that is able to stop vehicles in all lanes while ensuring that traffic flows. b. “Ensure motorists utilize the majority of the drop-off/pick-up area, including the far northern portion of the drive lane near the bus parking lot.” Have found this issue in other school lots throughout the state and it is never utilized. Can keep this recommendation but it likely will not occur. The revised access recommendations in this section would provide more stacking space on-site without having to count on this occurring. c. This section also mentions “If these management strategies do not improve operations and/or eliminate the majority of the queues along Hadley Avenue, extension of the northbound right-turn lane could be considered.” g. Based on the above information need to have some way to have more cars stack up on-site and not impact Hadley. i. Recommend the south access be closed and have all inbound and outbound be from the middle access be implemented with the project 1. This would also increase the length of the northbound right turn lane. 2. Study indicates minimal southbound left traffic so that left turn lane could be shorter. Additionally, the additional traffic is more likely to be from the south with the school expansion based on residential growth areas. 3. All exiting traffic should be forced to go north during school pick-up and drop-off times, which most does anyways due to traffic blocking the westbound left out of the site. The access will need to be widened to allow for a wide westbound lane (prefer that the lane be wide enough to accommodate a left and right turning vehicle during off-peak school times) and 2 inbound lanes. Add signage to the plan that no left turn allowed during the school hours (actual hours listed on the sign to be determined in coordination with the school). Some Pine Hill Elementary Addition Plan Review Page: 4 minor changes to the site circulation lanes may be needed on the west and south ends of the site. 3. School traffic and crossing guard impacts to long queues northbound at Hadley/90th Street. Considering the additional data and in recognition of the results provided, additional questions, concerns, and recommendations are identified by the city. a. Page 4 and 5: Crossing Guard at Hadley / 90th. Identified issue that causes significant queues for approximately 15 minutes. Can the school come up with some procedures or changes to eliminate or drastically reduce this issue? This is a continuing concern that is expected to increase with a traffic volume increase. b. Page 6: Northbound queues at 90th (also mentioned in 2030 analysis on Page 9) i. Operations do not account for operational impacts of the crossing guard. Any way that it can be? 1. Recognize that this is a short event but it is a daily event and it does result in poor operations/queues for that 15-minute window 5 days a week when school is in session. 2. Can something be done to reduce this impact? Especially since without the impact the operations appear to be acceptable from the analysis. 4. Procedures for school drop off and pick up. a. Page 5: New procedures for pick-up and drop-off i. Would think this would be intended to reduce queues onto the public roadway system. Please provide a formalized plan for pick-up and drop-off that can be submitted, finalized, and checked for compliance. b. Page 12: Restrict access to the pick-up/drop-off before the end of school i. Not sure how this can be enforced and do not think this is a good idea. This will just push the traffic to wait on Hadley, a public street. Remove this recommendation. ii. Prefer to try to find a way to stack more traffic on the school site (see previous comment on removing the south access). See other comments and recommendations. H:\COTT\_General\2020\Cottage Grove Schools 2020 Pavement Rehab\PineHillElem\103963 DRAFT Pine Hill Elementary School Stormwater Summary 5-06-2025.docx MEMORANDUM Date: 5-06-2025 To: Crystal Raleigh, PE From: Brent Johnson, PE Subject: Stormwater Rules Summary; Pine Hill Elementary School Stormwater Summary City of Cottage Grove Project No.: N15.103963 Redevelopment is being planned at the Pine Hill Elementary School. The following notes regarding the Cottage Grove stormwater rules and standards are excerpts from the City’s Surface Water Plan and the South Washington Watershed District rules. The future land use map for this parcel indicates Public/Semi Public. The Pine Hill Elementary School addition project is anticipated to include: - New impervious 0.349 acres. - Redeveloped impervious 0.066 acres. - Sum of new and reconstructed 0.415 acres. - Disturbed area will be over 1 acre. NPDES Permit and Total Phosphorus Load Limit: Because redevelopment will involve a disturbance of 1 acre or more, an NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit and SWPPP will be required, and the South Washington Watershed District total phosphorus (TP) load limits will apply. a. Volume Control: Volume control is not required because the sum of new and fully reconstructed impervious surfaces is less than 1 acre. The Pine Hill Elementary School site lies outside of the 10-year Groundwater Capture Zone of city wells, so stormwater infiltration features are allowed by the city within this area (if not precluded by other requirements of the MPCA or Department of Health). b. TP Load Limit: South Washington Watershed District rules call for TP loading rate of 0.22 lbs./acre/year or existing loading rates, whichever is less, since the project site drains to the Mississippi River. Submit a water quality analysis of existing and proposed TP loads using a method such as the P8 or MIDS models. If on-site BMPs are not sufficient to meet the water quality total phosphorus loading rates, the purchase of off-site mitigation credits is an option. Crystal Raleigh, PE 5-06-2025 Page: 2 Water Quality Treatment: For redeveloped areas the City requires a net reduction from pre-project conditions. Therefore, on an annual average basis, reductions shall be obtained for the stormwater discharge volume and the stormwater discharges of total suspended solids (TSS) and total phosphorus (TP). The net reduction will apply to impervious areas that are redeveloped. The proposed new impervious surfaces on redevelopment projects will need to achieve post- development reductions in TP and TSS by 50% and 80%, respectively. New impervious surfaces are defined as the difference between the total impervious area of the site before the re-development activity and the total impervious area for the post-re-development condition. Submit a water quality analysis to demonstrate compliance using a method such as the P8 or MIDS models. For water quality analyses using the MIDS or P8 models, the South Washington Watershed District (SWWD) Standards Manual (November 2023) includes required adjustments to the MIDS and P8 models: Model Parameter Required MIDS Retention Requirement 1.0 inch MIDS Total Phosphorus EMC, Change from Default 0.3 mg/l 0.31 mg/l P8 Precipitation and Temperature Files Download modified .pcp and .tmp files from District website P8 Start Date 1-1-1971 P8 Keep Date 1-1-1971 P8 Stop Date 12-31-2000 P8 Number of passes through the storm file 5 P8 Impervious Depression Storage 0.1 P8 Impervious Runoff Coefficient 0.9 P8 Max infiltration rate 0.8 inch/hour P8 Phosphorus Event Mean Concentration Nurp50 particle file P8 Total Suspended Solids Event Mean Concentration Nurp50 particle file The Standards Manual is available at the link below: SWWD_Standards-Guidance-Manual_Final_11062023.pdf (swwdmn.org) Rate Control: Peak flow rates after development shall not exceed pre-development peak flow rates for the critical 2-year, 10-year, and 100-year recurrence interval precipitation events. Use 24-hour NOAA Atlas 14 Precipitation events and MSE3 distribution for rate control analyses and pond storage design. More restrictive rate control criteria may be required to protect the integrity of downstream conveyance channels and ponds. Curve Numbers: The South Washington Watershed District Standards Manual specifies: Project proposers shall use runoff curve numbers (CN) based on land cover and HSG as published in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual: Stormwater runoff coefficients/curve numbers for different land uses – Minnesota Stormwater Manual (state.mn.us) Section 6.1.2 of the city Surface Water Management Plan includes the following guidance on curve numbers for pervious areas: Crystal Raleigh, PE 5-06-2025 Page: 3 Pervious Area Curve Numbers Hydrologic Soils Group (HSG) Pervious Areas Land Use Type Curve Number (CN) A Bluff/Ravine 55-58* A Public/Park/Open Space 61* A Rural Residential and ROW 66* A Pervious Surfaces for Urban land Use Types (Urban Residential, Commercial/Industrial) 61 B Bluff/Ravine 55-58 B Public/Open Space (Lawns, Parks, etc.), Grass Cover>75%, Good 61 B Rural Residential 66 C Public/Open Space (Lawns, Parks, etc.), Grass Cover>75%, Good 74 D Public/Open Space (Lawns, Parks, etc.), Grass Cover>75%, Good 80 *-Note: For areas within the city containing primarily HSG A soils, the CN values within the table for Bluff/Ravine, Park/Open Space, Rural Residential and ROW may be lowered to reflect soils with higher infiltration rates. However, it is assumed that the pervious surfaces for more urban land use types (Urban Residential and Commercial/Industrial) and HSG A soils will actually generate runoff depths similar to that of HSG B soils, due to factors such as: • Compaction of the soil surface layer during construction • Placement of topsoil and sod to retain soil moisture and promote healthy turf establishment. • Efficiently graded lots, limiting the amount of runoff allowed to pool on the landscape and infiltrate. The site soils include primarily hydrologic soil group A and we expect that proposed conditions pervious areas for urban land use types will be simulated with curve numbers of 61. Pretreatment: The city requires adequate pretreatment of stormwater runoff from development and redevelopment activities prior to discharge into all waterbodies. The city will require that infiltration and filtration basins be constructed to be “off-line” so that the basins fill along with their pretreatment basins, but higher flood flows are not routed through the infiltration or filtration basins, to have better long-term operation and less maintenance. If wet sediment ponds are used for pretreatment, they should include equalizer pipes to carry flow into the infiltration or filtration basins. Permanent Pools in Stormwater Ponds: In an effort to ensure that wet ponds are designed in a way to improve the probability of maintaining a normal water level, the following should be applied: Permanent pool volume should be greater than or equal to the volume of runoff from a 2.5-inch rainstorm under full projected watershed development. This value has been derived from design criteria developed under National Urban Runoff Program (NURP), with a 25% increase in volume to allow for roughly 25 years of sediment accumulation. In the summer, this sizing rule provides a mean hydraulic residence time of about 15 days. Crystal Raleigh, PE 5-06-2025 Page: 4 Additional items to help ponds achieve a normal water level: 1. Maximum depth of permanent pool shall be 8 feet or less. 2. 12” (minimum) of topsoil will be placed over the clay liner 3. 12” (minimum) clay liner shall be provided: a. Maximum permeability of 1x10-6 cm/s b. Liner to extend 1-foot vertically above the pond normal water level. 4. For ponds with permanent pools 1-2 times the volume of the 2.5” rain runoff: a. 3:1 slopes below the NWL will be allowed per city detail STO-15 5. For ponds with permanent pools 2-4 times the volume of the 2.5” rain runoff: a. 4:1 slopes below the NWL will be provided 6. No pond with a permanent pool greater than 4 times the volume of the 2.5” rain runoff will be allowed. Wetlands: The South Washington Watershed District will act as the Local Government Unit (LGU) for administration of the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). Please provide copies of wetland delineation and permitting correspondence to the city. The South Washington Watershed District rules call for wetland buffers and other requirements based on wetland management classification and size. Freeboard standards: For stormwater facilities with emergency overflows, the low adjacent grade elevation for all new structures must be a minimum of 3 feet above both the peak surface water elevation for the 100-year precipitation event and 2 feet above the emergency overflow elevation of any immediately adjacent new stormwater basin. For backyard and side-yard conveyance and temporary ponding areas, there must be at least 1 foot between the overland overflow elevation and the low adjacent grade elevation of the adjacent structure. Rational Storm Sewer Design: On-site storm sewer should be sized to a 5-year rational method design. Submit design calculations for the storm sewer system and a drainage area map showing each catchment with manholes and catch basins labeled. Include individual pipe segment velocities with calculations for review. Trunk facilities should be analyzed and designed to accommodate the 100-year ponded discharges plus 5-year rational flows from areas that enter the trunk to be carried to the next storage area downstream. a. Pipe sizes and slopes should be selected to provide a minimum open channel velocity of 3 feet per second. b. Maximum storm sewer velocities should be kept at 10 feet per second or less. c. When changing pipe sizes in structure, match crown of pipe elevations instead of inverts. d. Please show storm catch basin IDs, pipe sizes, grades, elevations, and drainage areas on the plans consistent with the rational design tables. e. Pipe outlets to wet ponds should be placed at the NWL and have design velocities of 6 fps or less. Pipe outlets into filtration basins or other overland discharge should have design velocities of 4 fps or less. Soil Borings: Soil borings are required in the vicinity of proposed volume control BMPs. Borings are needed to identify soil conditions and the presence of groundwater or bedrock. Soil borings should extend a minimum of 5 feet below the lowest constructed elevation of proposed BMPs. Crystal Raleigh, PE 5-06-2025 Page: 5 Control Erosion at Construction Sites: The city requires that applications for new or redevelopment activity include in their applications for City review, a SWPPP as required under the NPDES construction permit in effect at the time of review. Construction sites will be inspected to ensure compliance with the existing erosion and sediment control ordinance, Watershed District requirements, and with the construction site permit under NPDES Phase II MS4 rules. The city completes quality assurance inspections on all NPDES permits in the city (where the city is not the owner) twice each month. Erosion and sediment control best management practices as outlined in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual will be required and must be shown on required submittals to the City for approval. Any street sweeping conducted by the City to remove erosional debris from streets will be charged to the owner of the property. Testing: The city will require post-construction testing to verify the infiltration rates and drawdown periods of any infiltration basins. Models: Please note that digital copies of the final version stormwater models and shapefiles or CAD drawings of existing and proposed drainage areas are to be submitted to the city once the review and revision process is complete. NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit When the disturbed area of development or redevelopment exceeds 1 acre, an NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit and SWPPP is required. Record Drawings As requested, attached are record drawings for two pipe outlets from Pine Hill School. Both of these pipe outlets carry runoff from the Pine Hill School parcels to the Hamlet Heights development stormwater ponds (see attached Hamlet Heights Hydrology map). It is important that improvements on the Pine Hill School parcels not increase the high water levels of the Hamlet Heights stormwater ponds; and the Hamlet Heights HydroCAD model is available for your use in simulating the effects. H:\COTT\25X139406000\1_Corres\C_To Others\2025-09-10\139406 Plan Review 2025-09-10.docx MEMORANDUM Date: 09/10/2025 To: Paul Sponholz, PE From: Mike Boex, PE Subject: Pine Hill Elementary School Addition City of Cottage Grove, MN Project No.: 24X139406 This memo summarizes the review of site plan documents submitted by Wold Architects and BKBM Engineers, dated 9/8/25. Sheet C1.000: 1. With the proposed apron replacement on Hadley Avenue, a mill/overlay to centerline of the roadway will be required per city detail STR-21. a. Please include city detail STR-21 on Sheet C5.002 (but labeled C5.001 in the submittal) and remove detail STR-17. i. There are currently two sheets numbered C5.001; please revise the second to C5.002. b. The wear course of the mill-overlay section should be specified as SPWEA340C. c. Any impacted striping will need to be replaced. Stormwater Comments: 2. Sheet C6.000 lists existing and proposed impervious acreages: a. Sheet C6.000 includes a note beneath the “Proposed Drainage Areas” table stating: “Refer to Hydrology Narrative for an exhibit showing all drainage areas. The above drainage areas represent the tributary area to the existing basin and areas within the Pine Hill Elementary School.” However, upon review of the Hydrology Narrative, we were unable to locate an exhibit that clearly shows all modeled drainage areas. Please provide a comprehensive drainage area figure showing all areas included in both the existing and proposed HydroCAD and MIDS models, including both on-site and off-site drainage (e.g., City roadways, Area 100W). Improved documentation will help ensure consistent interpretation of modeling assumptions and confirm alignment between the plans, model inputs, and narrative. Traffic Study Comments: 3. Continue to work with staff to address previous traffic comments. PROJECT/COMM NO.: Pine Hill ES Addition and Renovation / 242224 SUBMITTAL DATE: 06/11/2025 LOCATION: 9015 Hadley Ave S, Cottage Grove, MN 55016 PROPERTY IDENTIFICATON NUMBER: 2002721220002 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Section 20 Township 027 Range 021 Brief Description of Project: The Pine Hill Elementary School project consists of a six-classroom addition, a small Gym addition, and an enclosed Freezer addition. The project includes a storm shelter designed through a portion of the classroom addition, which will accommodate the anticipated 5-year building capacity. Interior renovation through this project will address existing Special Education classrooms, accessibility-toilet upgrades, and minor renovations to the Kitchen. Long-Term Facility and Maintenance (LTFM) work is included to address: VCT flooring removal and replacement; operable gym wall removal and replacement; Gym flooring removal and replacement; Boiler & Chiller Plant removal and replacement; Freezer/Cooler removal; RTU/AHU Replacement for the Cafeteria, Gym, and Main Office; 1:1 LED Lighting Replacement; and Building-wide data re- cabling. Site and/or Design-Related Factors: The Architect’s recommendation is to locate the six-classroom addition on the North side of the existing building, which will encroach upon the 50’-0” property setback. A 1970 Kindergarten Addition created two classrooms that currently exceed beyond this property setback; as such, the proposed classroom addition will not exceed beyond the 1970 Addition but would encroach upon the 50’-0” property setback. Feasibility investigations to study the classroom addition on the other sides of the building are noted below: South: - This project will include a new storm shelter through our classroom addition, which will require a dedicated water service. If we locate the storm shelter on the south side of the building, it will double the length of water required unless we remove and replace the recently installed pavement and playground. This pavement was provided in 2021, and we would like to avoid the disruption of any new and still functional material where possible. - Similarly, the addition will require a sanitary sewer service, and we would intend to connect to the existing sewer that is on the NW side of the site. The length of this run would present some challenges if the addition is located on the South side and would potentially require a lift station. - There is an existing stormwater easement and stormwater pond on the South side of the building, and by providing the addition on the North, we would minimize the potential for any interference with this easement and stormwater pond. East: - The topography on the East side of the building is steep and will present some challenges with the proposed addition; as such, we have been advised that the grade change on the North is preferred for a new addition. - An addition on this side of the building would impact the amount of daylight that is currently received in existing classrooms and in the Media Center. - There is a higher concentration of trees on the East side of the building that we would like to avoid - both from a landscape perspective and in preserving the identity of "Pine Hill." West: - The West side of the building would potentially interfere with the recently renovated parking lot (2021). Similar to the previously noted sentiment of preserving recent work, we would like to avoid disrupting any new and functional components of the site as much as possible. - The addition on the West side would have a greater impact on the amount of daylighting to existing classroom windows. Given these reasons, the current design recommends the classroom addition be located on the North side of the building. This location would connect to an existing offset corridor and functionally create a loop to the core of the building. This would be a more efficient connection to utilize an existing circulation system and would subsequently connect two of the offset NW classrooms back to the broader building. Our proposed addition would not exceed the northernmost limits/extents of the existing building but would cross the previously discussed 50'-0" setback. This has previously been reviewed with and supported by the city planning and engineering departments. Please refer to the variance application for additional information. FREEZER GYM ADDITION PREK CL CL CL FLEX CL CL PREK M E MAIN ENTRANCE SPED ENTRANCE CL SPED SPED STORAGE STORAGE SPED RSRC STOR MOTOR STAFF TLT TLT T . COOLER GYM OFF. MEDIA CENTER CAFE.GYM GYM CL CL CLCL CLCLCL CL CLCL CLCL CL LOUNGE CL CL CL CL CL CL CL CL SPED TO PLAY SPED MAIN OFF SOCIAL WORK INSTRUCT. COACH PSYCH CONF NURSE PRINC DEAN FLEX COLLAB. OFF. WORK ROOM M.R. SMALL GROUP/ STAFF OFFICE SPED SPED TOTAL NEW ADDITION SF: 13,300 SF EXISTING BUILDING SF: TOTAL NEW BUILDING SF: 62,260 SF 75,560 SF F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: Scale: WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000 St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 woldae.com | 651 227 7773 # 6/ 6 / 2 0 2 5 1 : 2 3 : 2 2 P M Au t o d e s k D o c s : / / 2 4 2 2 2 4 - I S D 8 3 3 - P i n e H i l l E l e m e n ta r y S c h o o l A d d i t i o n a n d R e n o v a t i o n / 2 4 2 2 2 4 - P i n e H il l El e m e n t a r y S c h o o l A d d i t i o n a n d R e n o v a t i o n . r v t 1/16" = 1'-0" ISD #833 Pine Hill Elementary School Addition and Renovation A.01 OVERALL BUILDING SF 8400 E. Point Douglas Rd S., Cottage Grove, MN 55016 9015 Hadley Ave S, Cottage Grove, MN 55016 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DD ESTIMATE Checker Author Issue Date 242224 Revisions Description Date Num 0 1/16" = 1'-0" OVERALL BUILDING PLANF2 12' 24' CITY PLANNING SET UP UP DEMOLITION LEGEND WALL TO REMAIN DOOR TO REMAIN WALL TO BE REMOVED DOOR, FRAME, AND HARDWARE TO BE REMOVED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE DESIGNATED ITEM TO BE REMOVED DESIGNATED ITEM TO REMAIN DEMOLITION PLAN KEY NOTES: D01 REMOVE EXISTING EXTERIOR MASONRY WALL INCLUDING ANCHORS, BRACING, MORTAR, ETC COMPLETE TO THE APPROXIMATE EXTENTS SHOWN AND AS REQUIRED - COORDINATE EXTENTS WITH NEW WORK. REMOVE WALL FROM 8" BELOW SLAB TO THE HEIGHT INDICATED. SEE STRUCTURAL FOR SHORING REQUIREMENTS. D02 REMOVE EXISTING MASONRY WALL FROM SLAB TO DECK, INCLUDING ANCHORS, BRACING, MORTAR, ETC COMPLETE TO THE APPROXIMATE EXTENTS SHOWN AND AS REQUIRED - COORDINATE EXTENTS WITH NEW WORK. D03 REMOVE EXISTING GWB / METAL STUD PARTITION WALL FROM SLAB TO DECK, INCLUDING ANCHORS, SEALANT, ETC COMPLETE TO THE APPROXIMATE EXTENTS SHOWN AND AS REQUIRED - COORDINATE EXTENTS WITH NEW WORK. D04 REMOVE EXISTING WOOD, HOLLOW METAL (HM), OR FRP FRAME AND DOOR, INCLUDING GLAZING, HARDWARE, ANCHORS, ETC. COMPLETE. D05 SAWCUT AND REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE SLAB TO THE APPROXIMATE EXTENTS SHOWN AND AS REQUIRED - COORDINATE EXTENTS WITH NEW WORK. COORDINATE ALSO WITH MECHANICAL. D06 REMOVE EXISTING VCT FLOORING, INCLUDING BASE, ADHESIVES, ETC COMPLETELY. D07 REMOVE EXISTING LAY-IN (ACT) CEILING ASSEMBLY, INCLUDING GRIDS, HANGERS, PERIMETER TRIM, ETC COMPLETE - COORDINATE WITH MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL. D08 SEE MECHANICAL FOR REMOVAL OF EXISTING MECHANICAL FIXTURE, INCLUDING CARRIERS, ANCHORS, SEALANT, ETC IN ITS ENTIRETY. D09 REMOVE EXISTING TOILET ACCCESSORIES, INCLUDING GRAB BARS, SOAP DISPENSERS, MIRRORS, PAPER TOWEL DISPENSERS, ETC COMPLETE. VERIFY REQUIRED SALVAGE WITH NEW WORK AND / OR COORDINATE SALVAGE AND TURN ITEMS OVER TO OWNER. D10 WITH CLEAN GLOVES, CARFULLY REMOVE, PROTECT AND SALVAGE EXISTING LAY-IN (ACT) CEILING TILES AND PORTIONS OF GRID SYSTEM AS REQUIRED FOR NEW WORK - COORDINATE EXTENTS WITH NEW WORK. LABEL ITEMS FOR REINSTALLATION. SEE ALSO MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL. D11 REMOVE EXISTING CASEWORK INCLUDING ALL WARDROBE, BASE CABINETS, UPPER CABINETS, COUNTERTOPS, AND ALL ASSOCIATED ANCHORS, ADHESIVES, ETC. IN THEIR ENTIRETY AS INDICATED BY DASHED LINE. D12 REMOVE EXISTING WINDOW, INCLUDING GLAZING, ANCHORS, ETC. IN ITS ENTIRETY. D13 CAREFULLY REMOVE EXISTING LOCKERS AND PRESERVE FOR FUTURE REINSTALLATION. D14 DEMOLISH EXISTING FREEZER AND COOLER IN THEIR ENTIRETY. SEE MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. D15 REMOVE EXISTING KITCHEN EQUIPMENT IN ITS ENTIRETY. SEE ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. D16 REMOVE EXISTING OVERHEAD SECTIONAL DOOR IN ITS ENTIRETY INLCUDING TRACK, SPRING, MOUNTING BRACKETS, SENSORS, AND MOTOR. D17 DEMOLISH EXISTING STOREFRONT SYSTEM IN ITS ENTIRETY,INCLUDING GLAZING, HARDWARE, ANCHORS, ETC. D18 REMOVE EXISTING CEILING MOUNTED SWING, INCLUDING ALL HARDWARE, ANCHORS, STRUCTURAL ATTACHMENTS, MODIFIED CEILING TILES ETC. COMPLETELY. D19 CAREFULLY REMOVE EXISTING ELECTRIC CHANGING TABLE AND PRESERVE FOR FUTURE REINSTALLATION. SEE ALSO ELECTRICAL. D20 DEMOLISH EXISTING MARKERBOARDS, TACKBOARDS, SMTV, SMARTBOARDS AS INDICATED ON PLAN. RETURN ALL SMARTBOARDS AND SMTVS TO OWNER. SEE ALSO ELECTRICAL. D21 CAREFULLY REMOVE AND PRESERVE ALL EXISTING MARKERBOARDS, TACKBOARDS, SMTV, SMARTBOARDS AS INDICATED ON PLAN FOR RE-INSTALLATION. D22 REMOVE EXISTING METAL LOCKERS AND ASSOCIATED BASE AS OCCURS IN THEIR ENTIRETY. D23 REMOVE EXISTING VAULT DOOR AND FRAME IN ITS ENTIRETY, INCLUDING GLAZING, HARDWARE, ANCHORS, ETC. D24 REMOVE EXISTING DEMOUNTABLE PARTITION WALL, COMPLETE TO THE APPROXIMATE EXTENTS SHOWN AND AS REQUIRED - COORDINATE EXTENTS WITH NEW WORK. D25 REMOVE EXISTING CARPET FLOORING, INCLUDING BASE, ADHESIVES, ETC COMPLETELY. D02 D09 D02 D02 D02 D02 D09 D02D04 D04 D02 D09 D04 D02 D04 D09 D02D02 DEMOLISH EXISTING OPERABLE WALL IN ITS ENTIRETY. SEE ALSO STRUCTURAL. D16 D09 D02 D04 D16 D04 D13 D02 D08 D04 D08 D02 D13 D04 D02 D14 D14 D01 D01 D04 D15 D25 D25 D11 D25 D06 D01 REMOVE EXISTING WOODEN FRAME UPPER SHELVES AND ALL ASSOCIATED FASTENERS, ETC. IN THEIR ENTIRETY. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 C D E F G H H.1 J K L NM N.2 P D11 D11 N.1L.1 L.2 D17 D01 D23 D01 D11 D11 D11 D04 D11 D04 D11 D02 D11 D24 D04 D04 D22 D22 D01 D02D02 D22 D04 D03 D03 D03 D07D07 D07 D07 D07 D07 D07 D07 D04 D07 D07 D07 D07 D07 D07 D07 D25 F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: Scale: WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000 St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 woldae.com | 651 227 7773 # 6/ 2 / 2 0 2 5 3 : 0 0 : 2 0 P M Au t o d e s k D o c s : / / 2 4 2 2 2 4 - I S D 8 3 3 - P i n e H i l l E l e m e n ta r y S c h o o l A d d i t i o n a n d R e n o v a t i o n / 2 4 2 2 2 4 - P i n e H il l El e m e n t a r y S c h o o l A d d i t i o n a n d R e n o v a t i o n . r v t 1/8" = 1'-0" ISD #833 Pine Hill Elementary School Addition and Renovation A1.01a MAIN LEVEL DEMOLITION PLAN - AREA A 8400 E. Point Douglas Rd S., Cottage Grove, MN 55016 9015 Hadley Ave S, Cottage Grove, MN 55016 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DD ESTIMATE Checker Author Issue Date 242224 DEMOLITION GENERAL NOTES 1. DEMOLITION NOTES AND PLANS ARE PROVIDED AS A GUIDE ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND EXAMINE DRAWINGS AND DETAILS TO DETERMINE EXTENT AND LIMITS OF DEMOLITION REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE NEW CONSTRUCTION. 2. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION OF ALL ASPECTS OF DEMOLITION. CONTRACTOR TO REVIEW ALL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS AND CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING NOTES. MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL DEMOLITIONS ARE SHOWN ON MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. 3. REFER TO MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL FOR ADDITIONAL DEMOLITION NOTES. 4. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE DEMOLITION WITH DETAILS AND STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS TO INSTALL NEW LINTELS OR STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS TO SUPPORT EXISTING STRUCTURE. 5. PROVIDE AND COORDINATE ALL DEMOLITION AND RECONSTRUCTION WITH NEW WORK PLAN DIMENSIONS AND INSTALLATION OF NEW MATERIALS AND FINISHES, AS REQUIRED, WHETHER INDICATED ON DRAWINGS OR NOT. 6. PROVIDE SMOOTH AND CLEAN SUBSTRATE TO ALL AREAS RECEIVING NEW FINISHES. COORDINATE WORK WITH PLANS AND THE ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE. 7. ALL RELATED WOOD BLOCKING SUPPORT STRUCTURE, HARDWARE CONNECTION DEVICES, ADHESIVES, AND/OR MASTIC SHALL BE REMOVED FROM SURFACES AT ITEMS NOTED FOR REMOVAL. PROVIDE SURFACES ACCEPTABLE FOR PATCHING AND/OR NEW WORK. 8. DEMOLITION NOTES WITHOUT ARROWS INDICATE THAT THE NOTE APPLIES TO THE ENTIRE ROOM. 0 1/8" = 1'-0" MAIN LEVEL DEMOLITION PLAN - AREA AF1 6' 12' Revisions Description Date Num KEY PLAN A B C CITY PLANNING SET DEMOLITION LEGEND WALL TO REMAIN DOOR TO REMAIN WALL TO BE REMOVED DOOR, FRAME, AND HARDWARE TO BE REMOVED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE DESIGNATED ITEM TO BE REMOVED DESIGNATED ITEM TO REMAIN DEMOLITION PLAN KEY NOTES: D01 REMOVE EXISTING EXTERIOR MASONRY WALL INCLUDING ANCHORS, BRACING, MORTAR, ETC COMPLETE TO THE APPROXIMATE EXTENTS SHOWN AND AS REQUIRED - COORDINATE EXTENTS WITH NEW WORK. REMOVE WALL FROM 8" BELOW SLAB TO THE HEIGHT INDICATED. SEE STRUCTURAL FOR SHORING REQUIREMENTS. D02 REMOVE EXISTING MASONRY WALL FROM SLAB TO DECK, INCLUDING ANCHORS, BRACING, MORTAR, ETC COMPLETE TO THE APPROXIMATE EXTENTS SHOWN AND AS REQUIRED - COORDINATE EXTENTS WITH NEW WORK. D03 REMOVE EXISTING GWB / METAL STUD PARTITION WALL FROM SLAB TO DECK, INCLUDING ANCHORS, SEALANT, ETC COMPLETE TO THE APPROXIMATE EXTENTS SHOWN AND AS REQUIRED - COORDINATE EXTENTS WITH NEW WORK. D04 REMOVE EXISTING WOOD, HOLLOW METAL (HM), OR FRP FRAME AND DOOR, INCLUDING GLAZING, HARDWARE, ANCHORS, ETC. COMPLETE. D05 SAWCUT AND REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE SLAB TO THE APPROXIMATE EXTENTS SHOWN AND AS REQUIRED - COORDINATE EXTENTS WITH NEW WORK. COORDINATE ALSO WITH MECHANICAL. D06 REMOVE EXISTING VCT FLOORING, INCLUDING BASE, ADHESIVES, ETC COMPLETELY. D07 REMOVE EXISTING LAY-IN (ACT) CEILING ASSEMBLY, INCLUDING GRIDS, HANGERS, PERIMETER TRIM, ETC COMPLETE - COORDINATE WITH MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL. D08 SEE MECHANICAL FOR REMOVAL OF EXISTING MECHANICAL FIXTURE, INCLUDING CARRIERS, ANCHORS, SEALANT, ETC IN ITS ENTIRETY. D09 REMOVE EXISTING TOILET ACCCESSORIES, INCLUDING GRAB BARS, SOAP DISPENSERS, MIRRORS, PAPER TOWEL DISPENSERS, ETC COMPLETE. VERIFY REQUIRED SALVAGE WITH NEW WORK AND / OR COORDINATE SALVAGE AND TURN ITEMS OVER TO OWNER. D10 WITH CLEAN GLOVES, CARFULLY REMOVE, PROTECT AND SALVAGE EXISTING LAY-IN (ACT) CEILING TILES AND PORTIONS OF GRID SYSTEM AS REQUIRED FOR NEW WORK - COORDINATE EXTENTS WITH NEW WORK. LABEL ITEMS FOR REINSTALLATION. SEE ALSO MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL. D11 REMOVE EXISTING CASEWORK INCLUDING ALL WARDROBE, BASE CABINETS, UPPER CABINETS, COUNTERTOPS, AND ALL ASSOCIATED ANCHORS, ADHESIVES, ETC. IN THEIR ENTIRETY AS INDICATED BY DASHED LINE. D12 REMOVE EXISTING WINDOW, INCLUDING GLAZING, ANCHORS, ETC. IN ITS ENTIRETY. D13 CAREFULLY REMOVE EXISTING LOCKERS AND PRESERVE FOR FUTURE REINSTALLATION. D14 DEMOLISH EXISTING FREEZER AND COOLER IN THEIR ENTIRETY. SEE MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. D15 REMOVE EXISTING KITCHEN EQUIPMENT IN ITS ENTIRETY. SEE ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. D16 REMOVE EXISTING OVERHEAD SECTIONAL DOOR IN ITS ENTIRETY INLCUDING TRACK, SPRING, MOUNTING BRACKETS, SENSORS, AND MOTOR. D17 DEMOLISH EXISTING STOREFRONT SYSTEM IN ITS ENTIRETY,INCLUDING GLAZING, HARDWARE, ANCHORS, ETC. D18 REMOVE EXISTING CEILING MOUNTED SWING, INCLUDING ALL HARDWARE, ANCHORS, STRUCTURAL ATTACHMENTS, MODIFIED CEILING TILES ETC. COMPLETELY. D19 CAREFULLY REMOVE EXISTING ELECTRIC CHANGING TABLE AND PRESERVE FOR FUTURE REINSTALLATION. SEE ALSO ELECTRICAL. D20 DEMOLISH EXISTING MARKERBOARDS, TACKBOARDS, SMTV, SMARTBOARDS AS INDICATED ON PLAN. RETURN ALL SMARTBOARDS AND SMTVS TO OWNER. SEE ALSO ELECTRICAL. D21 CAREFULLY REMOVE AND PRESERVE ALL EXISTING MARKERBOARDS, TACKBOARDS, SMTV, SMARTBOARDS AS INDICATED ON PLAN FOR RE-INSTALLATION. D22 REMOVE EXISTING METAL LOCKERS AND ASSOCIATED BASE AS OCCURS IN THEIR ENTIRETY. D23 REMOVE EXISTING VAULT DOOR AND FRAME IN ITS ENTIRETY, INCLUDING GLAZING, HARDWARE, ANCHORS, ETC. D24 REMOVE EXISTING DEMOUNTABLE PARTITION WALL, COMPLETE TO THE APPROXIMATE EXTENTS SHOWN AND AS REQUIRED - COORDINATE EXTENTS WITH NEW WORK. D25 REMOVE EXISTING CARPET FLOORING, INCLUDING BASE, ADHESIVES, ETC COMPLETELY. D01 D02 D02 D04 D04 D09 D09 D04 D04 D09 D09 D02 D02 D02 D02 D02 D04 D09 D09 D04 D04 D09 D09 D02 D08 D11 D08 D11 CLASS B103 104 CLASS B102 102 CLASS B113 101 CLASS B112 103 CLASS B111 105 CLASS B110 107 CLASS B105 108 CLASS B104 106 CLASS B108 D08D11 D12 D12 D09 D06 D06 D06 D06 D06 CLASS B116 114 CLASS B115 113 SENSORY B115B 113B TLT B115A 113A 1 2 4 5 3 8 7 6 9 10 11 12 17 18 A B C D E F G H H.1 J K 13 14 15 16 L 1.8 9.1 8.5 L.1 D08 D11 D08 D11 D11 D11 D08 D11 D02 D02 D09 D02 D11 D02D09D11 D04 D17 D02 D04 D04 D17 D18 D19 D02 D11 D21 D20 D20 D09 D11 D02 D09 D11 D22 D22 D22 D22 D02 D02 D09 D11 D02 D09 D11 D02 D02D09D11 D02D09D11 D07 D07 D07 D07 D07 D07 D07 F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: Scale: WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000 St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 woldae.com | 651 227 7773 # 6/ 2 / 2 0 2 5 3 : 0 0 : 2 4 P M Au t o d e s k D o c s : / / 2 4 2 2 2 4 - I S D 8 3 3 - P i n e H i l l E l e m e n ta r y S c h o o l A d d i t i o n a n d R e n o v a t i o n / 2 4 2 2 2 4 - P i n e H il l El e m e n t a r y S c h o o l A d d i t i o n a n d R e n o v a t i o n . r v t 1/8" = 1'-0" ISD #833 Pine Hill Elementary School Addition and Renovation A1.01b MAIN LEVEL DEMOLITION PLAN - AREA B 8400 E. Point Douglas Rd S., Cottage Grove, MN 55016 9015 Hadley Ave S, Cottage Grove, MN 55016 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DD ESTIMATE Checker Author Issue Date 242224 DEMOLITION GENERAL NOTES 1. DEMOLITION NOTES AND PLANS ARE PROVIDED AS A GUIDE ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND EXAMINE DRAWINGS AND DETAILS TO DETERMINE EXTENT AND LIMITS OF DEMOLITION REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE NEW CONSTRUCTION. 2. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION OF ALL ASPECTS OF DEMOLITION. CONTRACTOR TO REVIEW ALL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS AND CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING NOTES. MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL DEMOLITIONS ARE SHOWN ON MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. 3. REFER TO MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL FOR ADDITIONAL DEMOLITION NOTES. 4. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE DEMOLITION WITH DETAILS AND STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS TO INSTALL NEW LINTELS OR STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS TO SUPPORT EXISTING STRUCTURE. 5. PROVIDE AND COORDINATE ALL DEMOLITION AND RECONSTRUCTION WITH NEW WORK PLAN DIMENSIONS AND INSTALLATION OF NEW MATERIALS AND FINISHES, AS REQUIRED, WHETHER INDICATED ON DRAWINGS OR NOT. 6. PROVIDE SMOOTH AND CLEAN SUBSTRATE TO ALL AREAS RECEIVING NEW FINISHES. COORDINATE WORK WITH PLANS AND THE ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE. 7. ALL RELATED WOOD BLOCKING SUPPORT STRUCTURE, HARDWARE CONNECTION DEVICES, ADHESIVES, AND/OR MASTIC SHALL BE REMOVED FROM SURFACES AT ITEMS NOTED FOR REMOVAL. PROVIDE SURFACES ACCEPTABLE FOR PATCHING AND/OR NEW WORK. 8. DEMOLITION NOTES WITHOUT ARROWS INDICATE THAT THE NOTE APPLIES TO THE ENTIRE ROOM. 0 1/8" = 1'-0" MAIN LEVEL DEMOLITION PLAN - AREA BF1 6' 12' Revisions Description Date Num KEY PLAN A B C CITY PLANNING SET DEMOLITION LEGEND WALL TO REMAIN DOOR TO REMAIN WALL TO BE REMOVED DOOR, FRAME, AND HARDWARE TO BE REMOVED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE DESIGNATED ITEM TO BE REMOVED DESIGNATED ITEM TO REMAIN DEMOLITION PLAN KEY NOTES: D01 REMOVE EXISTING EXTERIOR MASONRY WALL INCLUDING ANCHORS, BRACING, MORTAR, ETC COMPLETE TO THE APPROXIMATE EXTENTS SHOWN AND AS REQUIRED - COORDINATE EXTENTS WITH NEW WORK. REMOVE WALL FROM 8" BELOW SLAB TO THE HEIGHT INDICATED. SEE STRUCTURAL FOR SHORING REQUIREMENTS. D02 REMOVE EXISTING MASONRY WALL FROM SLAB TO DECK, INCLUDING ANCHORS, BRACING, MORTAR, ETC COMPLETE TO THE APPROXIMATE EXTENTS SHOWN AND AS REQUIRED - COORDINATE EXTENTS WITH NEW WORK. D03 REMOVE EXISTING GWB / METAL STUD PARTITION WALL FROM SLAB TO DECK, INCLUDING ANCHORS, SEALANT, ETC COMPLETE TO THE APPROXIMATE EXTENTS SHOWN AND AS REQUIRED - COORDINATE EXTENTS WITH NEW WORK. D04 REMOVE EXISTING WOOD, HOLLOW METAL (HM), OR FRP FRAME AND DOOR, INCLUDING GLAZING, HARDWARE, ANCHORS, ETC. COMPLETE. D05 SAWCUT AND REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE SLAB TO THE APPROXIMATE EXTENTS SHOWN AND AS REQUIRED - COORDINATE EXTENTS WITH NEW WORK. COORDINATE ALSO WITH MECHANICAL. D06 REMOVE EXISTING VCT FLOORING, INCLUDING BASE, ADHESIVES, ETC COMPLETELY. D07 REMOVE EXISTING LAY-IN (ACT) CEILING ASSEMBLY, INCLUDING GRIDS, HANGERS, PERIMETER TRIM, ETC COMPLETE - COORDINATE WITH MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL. D08 SEE MECHANICAL FOR REMOVAL OF EXISTING MECHANICAL FIXTURE, INCLUDING CARRIERS, ANCHORS, SEALANT, ETC IN ITS ENTIRETY. D09 REMOVE EXISTING TOILET ACCCESSORIES, INCLUDING GRAB BARS, SOAP DISPENSERS, MIRRORS, PAPER TOWEL DISPENSERS, ETC COMPLETE. VERIFY REQUIRED SALVAGE WITH NEW WORK AND / OR COORDINATE SALVAGE AND TURN ITEMS OVER TO OWNER. D10 WITH CLEAN GLOVES, CARFULLY REMOVE, PROTECT AND SALVAGE EXISTING LAY-IN (ACT) CEILING TILES AND PORTIONS OF GRID SYSTEM AS REQUIRED FOR NEW WORK - COORDINATE EXTENTS WITH NEW WORK. LABEL ITEMS FOR REINSTALLATION. SEE ALSO MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL. D11 REMOVE EXISTING CASEWORK INCLUDING ALL WARDROBE, BASE CABINETS, UPPER CABINETS, COUNTERTOPS, AND ALL ASSOCIATED ANCHORS, ADHESIVES, ETC. IN THEIR ENTIRETY AS INDICATED BY DASHED LINE. D12 REMOVE EXISTING WINDOW, INCLUDING GLAZING, ANCHORS, ETC. IN ITS ENTIRETY. D13 CAREFULLY REMOVE EXISTING LOCKERS AND PRESERVE FOR FUTURE REINSTALLATION. D14 DEMOLISH EXISTING FREEZER AND COOLER IN THEIR ENTIRETY. SEE MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. D15 REMOVE EXISTING KITCHEN EQUIPMENT IN ITS ENTIRETY. SEE ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. D16 REMOVE EXISTING OVERHEAD SECTIONAL DOOR IN ITS ENTIRETY INLCUDING TRACK, SPRING, MOUNTING BRACKETS, SENSORS, AND MOTOR. D17 DEMOLISH EXISTING STOREFRONT SYSTEM IN ITS ENTIRETY,INCLUDING GLAZING, HARDWARE, ANCHORS, ETC. D18 REMOVE EXISTING CEILING MOUNTED SWING, INCLUDING ALL HARDWARE, ANCHORS, STRUCTURAL ATTACHMENTS, MODIFIED CEILING TILES ETC. COMPLETELY. D19 CAREFULLY REMOVE EXISTING ELECTRIC CHANGING TABLE AND PRESERVE FOR FUTURE REINSTALLATION. SEE ALSO ELECTRICAL. D20 DEMOLISH EXISTING MARKERBOARDS, TACKBOARDS, SMTV, SMARTBOARDS AS INDICATED ON PLAN. RETURN ALL SMARTBOARDS AND SMTVS TO OWNER. SEE ALSO ELECTRICAL. D21 CAREFULLY REMOVE AND PRESERVE ALL EXISTING MARKERBOARDS, TACKBOARDS, SMTV, SMARTBOARDS AS INDICATED ON PLAN FOR RE-INSTALLATION. D22 REMOVE EXISTING METAL LOCKERS AND ASSOCIATED BASE AS OCCURS IN THEIR ENTIRETY. D23 REMOVE EXISTING VAULT DOOR AND FRAME IN ITS ENTIRETY, INCLUDING GLAZING, HARDWARE, ANCHORS, ETC. D24 REMOVE EXISTING DEMOUNTABLE PARTITION WALL, COMPLETE TO THE APPROXIMATE EXTENTS SHOWN AND AS REQUIRED - COORDINATE EXTENTS WITH NEW WORK. D25 REMOVE EXISTING CARPET FLOORING, INCLUDING BASE, ADHESIVES, ETC COMPLETELY. DEMOLISH EXISTING WOODEN FRAME STAGE INCLUDING ALL FASTENERS, ADHESIVES, ETC. IN ITS ENTIRETY D01 D02 MEDIA C101 MECH C108 OFFICE C107 D11 D04 D12 D12D12 CAREFULLY REMOVE AND SALVAGE EXISTING ROLLING BOOK STACKS FOR REINSTALLATION. SEE FLOOR PLANS FOR REINSTALLATION. D06 D06 1 2 4 5 3 8 7 6 9 10 11 12 17 J K 13 14 15 16 L NM N.2 P Q R S U VT 1.8 R.1N.1 9.1 8.5 L.1 L.2 D07 D10 D10 D10 D10 D10 D10 D12 F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: Scale: WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000 St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 woldae.com | 651 227 7773 # 6/ 4 / 2 0 2 5 3 : 3 1 : 3 5 P M Au t o d e s k D o c s : / / 2 4 2 2 2 4 - I S D 8 3 3 - P i n e H i l l E l e m e n ta r y S c h o o l A d d i t i o n a n d R e n o v a t i o n / 2 4 2 2 2 4 - P i n e H il l El e m e n t a r y S c h o o l A d d i t i o n a n d R e n o v a t i o n . r v t 1/8" = 1'-0" ISD #833 Pine Hill Elementary School Addition and Renovation A1.01c MAIN LEVEL DEMOLITION PLAN - AREA C 8400 E. Point Douglas Rd S., Cottage Grove, MN 55016 9015 Hadley Ave S, Cottage Grove, MN 55016 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DD ESTIMATE Checker Author Issue Date 242224 DEMOLITION GENERAL NOTES 1. DEMOLITION NOTES AND PLANS ARE PROVIDED AS A GUIDE ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND EXAMINE DRAWINGS AND DETAILS TO DETERMINE EXTENT AND LIMITS OF DEMOLITION REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE NEW CONSTRUCTION. 2. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION OF ALL ASPECTS OF DEMOLITION. CONTRACTOR TO REVIEW ALL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS AND CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING NOTES. MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL DEMOLITIONS ARE SHOWN ON MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. 3. REFER TO MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL FOR ADDITIONAL DEMOLITION NOTES. 4. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE DEMOLITION WITH DETAILS AND STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS TO INSTALL NEW LINTELS OR STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS TO SUPPORT EXISTING STRUCTURE. 5. PROVIDE AND COORDINATE ALL DEMOLITION AND RECONSTRUCTION WITH NEW WORK PLAN DIMENSIONS AND INSTALLATION OF NEW MATERIALS AND FINISHES, AS REQUIRED, WHETHER INDICATED ON DRAWINGS OR NOT. 6. PROVIDE SMOOTH AND CLEAN SUBSTRATE TO ALL AREAS RECEIVING NEW FINISHES. COORDINATE WORK WITH PLANS AND THE ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE. 7. ALL RELATED WOOD BLOCKING SUPPORT STRUCTURE, HARDWARE CONNECTION DEVICES, ADHESIVES, AND/OR MASTIC SHALL BE REMOVED FROM SURFACES AT ITEMS NOTED FOR REMOVAL. PROVIDE SURFACES ACCEPTABLE FOR PATCHING AND/OR NEW WORK. 8. DEMOLITION NOTES WITHOUT ARROWS INDICATE THAT THE NOTE APPLIES TO THE ENTIRE ROOM. 0 1/8" = 1'-0" MAIN LEVEL DEMOLITION PLAN - AREA CF2 6'12' Revisions Description Date Num KEY PLAN A B C CITY PLANNING SET OFF A118 STOR A112A DRY STOR A111 GYM A112 DISH A104 KITCHEN A105 TLT A142B CUST. A134 TLT A133WORK ROOM A139 CAFETERIA A103 OFFICE A140 CONF A141 46 ' - 1 0 " 2 0 ' - 0 " 6' - 4 " 1'-0" 6'-6" GB1 MA1 GA6 GB2 MA1 41'-6"38'-0" 1'-0" GA5 GA6 E-BM08 MA3 CIRC A106 TLT A108 COOLER A109 CUST A107 FREEZER A110A STAFF LOUNGE A123 TLT A125 TLT A124 GYM A128 STOR A127 CIRC A126 CUST A132 E- B M 0 8 12 ' - 0 " 29'-8" 26'-8" TRASH A150 BOILER A114 MA1 GB2 MA1 MA1 MA3 SEE FOODSERVICE PLANS FOR KITCHEN LAYOUT 20 FEP 20 FEP FEP 19 B3 A5 . 1 0 1 B5 A5.101 B1 A5.101 C2 A5.101 C4 A5 . 1 0 1 C1 A5 . 1 0 1 MA3 2'-4" SHUTTER 5'-0" COILING 8" MA3 NEW DIVIDER GYM CURTAIN COILING SHUTTER 29'-0" RECEP A136 INFILL FULL HEIGHT 16" MASONRY BLOCK WALL ABOVE NEW DOOR AT REMOVED OPERABLE WALL OPENING. 8'-0" 8'-5" 19 8'-3"6' - 0 " 10 ' - 4 " 3 ' - 0 " 15'-0" 38'-8" A1 4 2 A OFFICE A120A A1 4 2 B A140 A133 A134 A125 A127A A1 1 8 A1 2 6 B A 1 2 6 A A110 A103A A1 2 4 A112A A120A A1 2 0 C A128A A1 2 6 C A1 2 7 B 20 4'-0"W1 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 C D E F G H H.1 J K L NM N.2 P 11 ' - 4 " 2'-0" 5'-9" CW1 GB2 CW2 CW2 OFFICE A120B HEALTH OFF A142 HEALTH A142A CIRC A110 OFFICE A143 SECURE VEST A101 CIRC A102 A5.103 E1 C7 A5.103 B7 10 ' - 8 " 17'-0" 11'-8" 16 ' - 0 " TBD 6'-0" 5 PHONE A142B N.1L.1 L.2 2' - 0 " 2' - 0 " A120B GA3 GA6 GA6 GB1 DATA A120C TBD 3'-0" 5 TBD 3'-0" 5 MBD 6'-0" 5 MBD 6'-0" 5 B7 A5 . 1 0 1 10 ' - 6 " 8'-5" SF1 C2 A5.201 _______ A105 C5 A5.201 _______ C3 A5.201 _______ C1 A5.201 _______ F2 A5.201 _______ F4 A5.201 _______ C4 A5.202 _______ C5 A5.202 _______ C6 A5.201 _______ F1 A5.201 _______ F5 A5.201 _______ C2 A5.202 _______ C1 A5.202 _______ A5.103 C3 A5.103 C5 A4.401 E4 D4 D1 E1 A4.401 B3 A4.401B1 _______C3 A4.105 _______D1 A4.105 _______C5 A4.105 _______D3 A4.105 SMTV (NIC) GA2 MA1 MA1 GA6 GB2 GA6 RESOURCE A144 EWC DOUBLE WITH BOTTLE FILLER EWC DOUBLE WITH BOTTLE FILLER EWC DOUBLE WITH BOTTLE FILLER GB2 1' - 0 " MA1 GA6 GB2 GA6 GA6 GA6 GA6 A104 E-BM08 E- B M 0 8 1'-4" 9'-0" GB1 3'-4" GB1 21 19 19 19 19 E- B M 0 8 E- B M 0 8 E-BM08 2' - 4 " 6 ' - 8 " GB1 E-BM08 MA3 MA3 59 ' - 4 " 03 03 03 03 03 03 03 19 19 A4.401E7 2' - 0 " 2' - 0 " 16 1619 16 16 16 SEE SHEET _____ FOR GYM STRIPING PLANS A4.310 16 19 GA6 10'-3" SEE SHEET _____ FOR GYM STRIPING PLANS A4.311 MA7 19 DEAN A138 PRINC. A137 FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTES: 01 HCAP DOOR ACTUATOR - SEE ELECTRICAL FOR ROUGH-IN 02 STEEL PIPE BOLLARD - SEE DETAIL 03 PATCH FLOOR AS INDICATED BY HATCH TO MATCH EXISTING FLOOR. 04 CAN WASH - SEE DETAIL . SEE ALSO MECHANICAL 05 MOP SINK - SEE MECHANICAL 06 CABINET UNIT HEATER. SEE DETAIL 43046. SEE MECH. FOR SPECIFICATIONS, COORDINATE LOCATION WITH MECHANICAL 07 CARD READER - SEE ELECTRICAL 08 INSTALL EXISTING RE-LOCATED ELECTRIC CHANGING TABLE. SEE ELECTRICAL. 09 LOCATION OF STACKED WASHER AND DRYER (NIC) - SEE MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL FOR ROUGH-IN 10 RE-INSTALL EXISTING MARKERBOARDS, TACKBOARDS, SMTV, SMARTBOARDS AS INDICATED ON FLOOR PLAN. COORDINATE WITH DEMOLITION PLANS. SEE ALSO ELECTRICAL. B3/A6.001 D7/A4.706 11 STEEL PIPE RAIL / RAILING, FIELD PAINTED 12 STEEL LADDER, FIELD PAINTED - SEE 61014 & 61025 13 EXTERIOR LIGHTING - SEE ELECTRICAL 14 EXTERIOR SIGNAGE 15 FIELD PAINTED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT - SEE MECHANICAL 16 TOOTH-IN MASONRY AT REMOVED EXTENTS PER THE DEMOLITION PLAN TO MATCH EXISTING COURSING. 17 CORNER GUARD 18 DOCK BUMPER - SEE DETAIL 19 PAINT TO MATCH EXISTING. REFER TO PLAN FOR EXTENTS INDICATED. 20 INSTALL EXISTING LOCKERS. PROVIDE NEW FINSHED END PANEL TO EXTENTS INDICATED ON PLAN, COLOR NOTED BY ARCHITECT. D5/A6.001 21 INFILL EXISTING SLAB ON GRADE TO EXTENTS INDICATED BY HATCH. COORDINATE REMAINING SLAB DIMENSIONS WITH FOOD SERVICE EQUIPMENT. 22 PROVIDE BLACK LAMINATE COUNTERTOP TRIM AT AREA OF REMOVED COUNTERTOP. 23 STORM-RATED SHUTTER. SEE PLAN FOR WIDTH. F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: Scale: WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000 St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 woldae.com | 651 227 7773 # 6/ 4 / 2 0 2 5 3 : 3 0 : 2 1 P M Au t o d e s k D o c s : / / 2 4 2 2 2 4 - I S D 8 3 3 - P i n e H i l l E l e m e n ta r y S c h o o l A d d i t i o n a n d R e n o v a t i o n / 2 4 2 2 2 4 - P i n e H il l El e m e n t a r y S c h o o l A d d i t i o n a n d R e n o v a t i o n . r v t 1/8" = 1'-0" ISD #833 Pine Hill Elementary School Addition and Renovation A2.01a MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - AREA A 8400 E. Point Douglas Rd S., Cottage Grove, MN 55016 9015 Hadley Ave S, Cottage Grove, MN 55016 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DD ESTIMATE Checker Author Issue Date 242224 0 1/8" = 1'-0" MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - AREA AF1 6'12' ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE - AREA A ROOM NO ROOM NAME FLOOR BASE N WALL - TYP E WALL S WALL W WALL REMARK SMATL FIN MATL FIN MATL FIN MATL FIN A101 SECURE VEST EXIST. EXIST A102 CIRC EXIST. EXIST A103 CAFETERIA EXIST. TERR. EXIST A104 DISH QUARRY TILE PT-6A 1 A105 KITCHEN EXIST EXIST EXIST A106 CIRC EXIST. EXIST A107 CUST EXIST. EXIST A108 TLT PTILE-1 CTILE-1 CTILE-1 1 A109 COOLER CONC -- A110 CIRC CONC. PT-6A A110A FREEZER CONC. -- A111 DRY STOR EXIST EXIST A112 GYM RAF-1 EXIST A112A STOR EXIST EXIST A114 BOILER EXIST EXIST A118 OFF PT CONC. VB-1 PT-6A A120A OFFICE EXIST. TERR. GWB PT-6A A120B OFFICE EXIST. TERR. GWB PT-6A A120C DATA EXIST. TERR. GWB PT-6A A123 STAFF LOUNGE EXIST EXIST A124 TLT PTILE-1 CTILE-1 CTILE-1 1 A125 TLT PTILE-1 CTILE-1 CTILE-1 1 A126 CIRC TERR-1 VB-1 PT-6A 1 A127 STOR CONC VB-1 -- 1 A128 GYM RAF-1 VB-1 PT-6A 1 A132 CUST EXIST EXIST A133 TLT PTILE-1 CTILE-1 CTILE-1 1 A134 CUST. EXIST EXIST A136 RECEP TERR-1 EXIST WP-1 A137 PRINC. TERR-1 EXIST A138 DEAN TERR-1 EXIST A139 WORK ROOM EXIST. TERR PT-6A 1 A140 OFFICE EXIST. TERR. PT-6A 1 A141 CONF TERR-1 EXIST A142 HEALTH OFF EXIST. TERR. PT-6A A142A HEALTH EXIST. TERR. EXIST A142B TLT PTILE-1 CTILE-1 CTILE-1 1 A142B PHONE EXIST. TERR. PT-6A A143 OFFICE EXIST. TERR. EXIST A144 RESOURCE EXIST. TERR. EXIST A145 RESOURCE EXIST. TERR. EXIST A150 TRASH EXIST EXIST KEY PLAN A B C DOOR / OPENING SCHEDULE DOOR NO DOOR / OPENING LABEL/ RATING OVERALL WIDTH FRAME GL MOUNTING CONDITIONS HDW GRP REMARKSTYPE QTY WIDTH HEIGHT MATL TYPE DEPTH MATL HEAD JAMB SILL A103A F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-4" FR1A -- AL -- A104 MCDB 1 5'-0" 4'-2" ST -- 5'-0" MCDB -- ST -- A105 MCDB 1 29'-0" 8'-0" ST -- 29'-0" MCDB -- ST -- A110 F 2 3'-0" 7'-0" FRP -- 6'-4" FR 1 -- AL -- A112A F 2 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 6'-4" FR 1 -- AL -- A118 G 1 3'-0" 7'-0" WD -- 6'-3 3/8" FR 2A -- HM -- A120A F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-4" FR 1 -- HM -- A120B F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-4" FR 1 -- HM -- A120C F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-4" FR 1 -- HM -- A120H AL 1 3'-0" 7'-0" AL -- 3'-0" CW X -- AL -- A124 F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-4" FR1A -- AL -- A125 F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-4" FR1A -- AL -- A126A AL 1 3'-0" 7'-0" AL -- 3'-0" SF X -- AL -- A126B AL 1 3'-0" 7'-0" AL -- 3'-0" SF X -- AL -- FLOOR PLAN GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL PLAN DIMENSIONS ARE NOMINAL TO FACE OF WALL. WALL THICKNESSES ARE SHOWN NOMINAL, SEE WALL TYPES FOR ACTUAL THICKNESS. 2. ALL GWB / METAL STUD WALLS ARE TO BE 5 INCHES THICK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3. ALL CONCRETE BLOCK WALLS ARE TO BE 8 INCHES THICK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. COORDINATE SIZE AND LOCATION OF ALL DUCT AND SHAFT OPENINGS IN WALLS AND FLOORS W/ MECH. AND ELEC. PROVIDE ALL REQUIRED LINTELS FOR OPENINGS. SEE LINTEL SCHEDULE. 5. FIELD VERIFY ALL MILLWORK OPENINGS. 6. SET FLOOR DRAINS 3/4" BELOW FINISHED CONCRETE FLOORS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PROVIDE CONSISTENT SLOPE FROM WALL TO DRAIN BY SLOPING CONCRETE, MIN. 1/4" PER FOOT. 7. VERIFY LOCATION, SIZE AND QUANTITY OF ALL EQUIPMENT PADS WITH MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL. 8. ALL DOOR / SIDELITE OPENINGS TO BEGIN 4" FROM ADJACENT WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 9. ALL GWB / METAL STUD WALLS ARE CENTERED ON GRID UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 10. FIRE RATED WALLS ARE INDICATED ON CODE PLANS. Revisions Description Date Num DOOR / OPENING SCHEDULE DOOR NO DOOR / OPENING LABEL/ RATING OVERALL WIDTH FRAME GL MOUNTING CONDITIONS HDW GRP REMARKSTYPE QTY WIDTH HEIGHT MATL TYPE DEPTH MATL HEAD JAMB SILL A126C N 2 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 6'-4" FR 1 -- AL -- A127A F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-4" FR1A -- AL -- A127B F 2 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 6'-4" FR 1 -- AL -- A128A F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" FRP -- 3'-4" FR1A -- AL -- A133 F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM 3'-4" FR 1 -- HM -- A134 F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-4" FR 1 -- HM -- A140 G 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 5'-4 3/8" FR 2A -- HM -- A142A N 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 5'-6" FR 2A -- HM -- A142B FG2 1 3'-7" 7'-0" 7'-4" FR 3 A152 F 2 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 6'-4" FR 1 -- AL -- A242 F 2 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 6'-4" FR 1 -- AL -- A402 F 2 4'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 8'-4" FR 1 -- AL -- A517 -- 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-4" FR X -- HM -- CITY PLANNING SET TLT B115A 113A MOTOR B117 CLASS B110 107 CLASS B108 MOTHERS ROOM B101A TLT B102A CLASS B104 106 CLASS B103 104 CLASS B102 102 CLASS B111 105 CLASS B113 101 CLASS B112 103 CLASS B105 108 CIRC B100 CIRC B114 CLASS B116 114 CLASS B115 113 SENSORY B115B 113B 1'-0"7'-3" 4' - 7 " 8 ' - 1 " MA1 GA6 MA1 GB2 1'-0" 7'-3" 8' - 0 " 5 ' - 8 " MA1 MA1 GB2 GA6 MA1 1'-0" 7'-3" 5' - 8 " 8 ' - 0 " MA1 GA6 MA1 MA1 GB2 1'-0"7'-3" MA1 GA6 MA1 GB2 MA1 MA3 GB2 MA3 GB2 8' - 0 " 8' - 0 " TLT B104A TLT B110A TLT B112A B117 B116B B115B B1 0 4 A B1 1 0 A B1 0 2 A B1 1 2 A B1 0 8 B116A1 B1 1 6 A MA3 GA6 GA6 1 2 4 5 3 8 7 6 9 10 11 12 1718 A B C D E F G H H.1 J K 13 14 15 16 L (14) LT #1 OFFICE B116A A5.103 B1 A5.103 C1 A5.103 E3 A5.103B3 A5.103 B5 1.8 9.1 8.5 L.1 4' - 8 " 8 ' - 0 " (4 ) L T # 1 (4) LT #1 _______F1 A4.105 _______F3 A4.105 _______F5 A4.105 _______F7 A4.105 _______D5 A4.105 (15) LT #1 A4.401 B7 B5 EWC BOTTLE FILLER MA2 08 10 MBD 10'-0" 3 SMTV (NIC) MBD 4'-0" 5 B115L B116L 03 GA6 GA6 B113A STOR B113A GA6 STOR B103A STOR B105A STOR B111A B103A B111A B105A 03 03 03 03 16 16 16 16 GA6 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 03 03 C120 FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTES: 01 HCAP DOOR ACTUATOR - SEE ELECTRICAL FOR ROUGH-IN 02 STEEL PIPE BOLLARD - SEE DETAIL 03 PATCH FLOOR AS INDICATED BY HATCH TO MATCH EXISTING FLOOR. 04 CAN WASH - SEE DETAIL . SEE ALSO MECHANICAL 05 MOP SINK - SEE MECHANICAL 06 CABINET UNIT HEATER. SEE DETAIL 43046. SEE MECH. FOR SPECIFICATIONS, COORDINATE LOCATION WITH MECHANICAL 07 CARD READER - SEE ELECTRICAL 08 INSTALL EXISTING RE-LOCATED ELECTRIC CHANGING TABLE. SEE ELECTRICAL. 09 LOCATION OF STACKED WASHER AND DRYER (NIC) - SEE MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL FOR ROUGH-IN 10 RE-INSTALL EXISTING MARKERBOARDS, TACKBOARDS, SMTV, SMARTBOARDS AS INDICATED ON FLOOR PLAN. COORDINATE WITH DEMOLITION PLANS. SEE ALSO ELECTRICAL. B3/A6.001 D7/A4.706 11 STEEL PIPE RAIL / RAILING, FIELD PAINTED 12 STEEL LADDER, FIELD PAINTED - SEE 61014 & 61025 13 EXTERIOR LIGHTING - SEE ELECTRICAL 14 EXTERIOR SIGNAGE 15 FIELD PAINTED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT - SEE MECHANICAL 16 TOOTH-IN MASONRY AT REMOVED EXTENTS PER THE DEMOLITION PLAN TO MATCH EXISTING COURSING. 17 CORNER GUARD 18 DOCK BUMPER - SEE DETAIL 19 PAINT TO MATCH EXISTING. REFER TO PLAN FOR EXTENTS INDICATED. 20 INSTALL EXISTING LOCKERS. PROVIDE NEW FINSHED END PANEL TO EXTENTS INDICATED ON PLAN, COLOR NOTED BY ARCHITECT. D5/A6.001 21 INFILL EXISTING SLAB ON GRADE TO EXTENTS INDICATED BY HATCH. COORDINATE REMAINING SLAB DIMENSIONS WITH FOOD SERVICE EQUIPMENT. 22 PROVIDE BLACK LAMINATE COUNTERTOP TRIM AT AREA OF REMOVED COUNTERTOP. 23 STORM-RATED SHUTTER. SEE PLAN FOR WIDTH. F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: Scale: WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000 St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 woldae.com | 651 227 7773 # 6/ 2 / 2 0 2 5 3 : 0 0 : 4 0 P M Au t o d e s k D o c s : / / 2 4 2 2 2 4 - I S D 8 3 3 - P i n e H i l l E l e m e n ta r y S c h o o l A d d i t i o n a n d R e n o v a t i o n / 2 4 2 2 2 4 - P i n e H il l El e m e n t a r y S c h o o l A d d i t i o n a n d R e n o v a t i o n . r v t 1/8" = 1'-0" ISD #833 Pine Hill Elementary School Addition and Renovation A2.01b MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - AREA B 8400 E. Point Douglas Rd S., Cottage Grove, MN 55016 9015 Hadley Ave S, Cottage Grove, MN 55016 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DD ESTIMATE Checker Author Issue Date 242224 0 1/8" = 1'-0" MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - AREA BF5 6' 12' KEY PLAN A B C FLOOR PLAN GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL PLAN DIMENSIONS ARE NOMINAL TO FACE OF WALL. WALL THICKNESSES ARE SHOWN NOMINAL, SEE WALL TYPES FOR ACTUAL THICKNESS. 2. ALL GWB / METAL STUD WALLS ARE TO BE 5 INCHES THICK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3. ALL CONCRETE BLOCK WALLS ARE TO BE 8 INCHES THICK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. COORDINATE SIZE AND LOCATION OF ALL DUCT AND SHAFT OPENINGS IN WALLS AND FLOORS W/ MECH. AND ELEC. PROVIDE ALL REQUIRED LINTELS FOR OPENINGS. SEE LINTEL SCHEDULE. 5. FIELD VERIFY ALL MILLWORK OPENINGS. 6. SET FLOOR DRAINS 3/4" BELOW FINISHED CONCRETE FLOORS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PROVIDE CONSISTENT SLOPE FROM WALL TO DRAIN BY SLOPING CONCRETE, MIN. 1/4" PER FOOT. 7. VERIFY LOCATION, SIZE AND QUANTITY OF ALL EQUIPMENT PADS WITH MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL. 8. ALL DOOR / SIDELITE OPENINGS TO BEGIN 4" FROM ADJACENT WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 9. ALL GWB / METAL STUD WALLS ARE CENTERED ON GRID UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 10. FIRE RATED WALLS ARE INDICATED ON CODE PLANS. Revisions Description Date Num ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE - AREA B ROOM NO ROOM NAME FLOOR BASE N WALL - TYP E WALL S WALL W WALL REMARKSMATL FIN MATL FIN MATL FIN MATL FIN B100 CIRC EXIST. TERR. EXIST EXIST B101A MOTHERS ROOM EXIST. TERR. B102 CLASS EXIST. TERR. EXIST B102A TLT PTILE-1 CTILE-1 CTILE-1 1 B103 CLASS EXIST. TERR. EXIST B103A STOR EXIST. TERR. EXIST -- B104 CLASS EXIST. TERR. EXIST B104A TLT PTILE-1 CTILE-1 CTILE-1 1 B105 CLASS EXIST. TERR. EXIST B105A STOR EXIST. TERR -- 1 B108 CLASS EXIST. TERR. EXIST. B110 CLASS EXIST. TERR. EXIST B110A TLT PTILE-1 CTILE-1 CTILE-1 1 B111 CLASS EXIST. TERR EXIST. B111A STOR EXIST. TERR. -- 1 B112 CLASS EXIST. TERR. EXIST. B112A TLT PTILE-1 CTILE-1 CTILE-1 1 B113 CLASS EXIST. TERR. EXIST. B113A STOR EXIST. TERR. -- 1 B114 CIRC EXIST. TERR. EXIST. B115 CLASS TERR-1 PT-6A 1 B115A TLT EXIST. EXIST. B115B SENSORY TERR-1 EXIST. B116 CLASS TERR-1 PT-6A B116A OFFICE TERR-1 PT-6A B116B CIRC EXIST. TERR. EXIST. B117 MOTOR RUB-1 PT-6A DOOR / OPENING SCHEDULE DOOR NO DOOR / OPENING LABEL/ RATING OVERALL WIDTH FRAME GL MOUNTING CONDITIONS HDW GRP REMARKSTYPE QTY WIDTH HEIGHT MATL TYPE DEPTH MATL HEAD JAMB SILL B102A F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-4" FR1A -- AL -- B103A F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-4" FR1A -- AL -- B104A F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-4" FR1A -- AL -- B105A F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-4" FR1A -- AL -- B108 N 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-4" FR1A -- AL -- B110A F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-4" FR1A -- AL -- B111A F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-4" FR1A -- AL -- B112A F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-4" FR1A -- AL -- B113A F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-4" FR1A -- AL -- B115A F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-4" FR1A -- AL -- B115B F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 4'-10" FR 3A -- AL -- B115L -- -- 5'-0" 4'-0" -- -- 5'-0" FR 4B -- HM -- B116A G 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 4'-10" FR 3A -- AL -- B116A1 G 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 4'-4" FR 3A -- AL -- B116B G 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 4'-4" FR 3A -- AL -- B116L -- -- 5'-0" 4'-0" -- -- 5'-0" FR 4B -- HM -- B117 G 1 4'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 5'-10" FR 3A -- AL -- CITY PLANNING SET OFFICE C107 RESOURCE C109 MEDIA C101 32'-10" 36'-4" 8'-8" 54'-4" 52'-8" 34'-4" CIRC C119 CLASS C117 CLASS C116 CLASS C114 CLASS C113 CIRC C111 CLASS C112 ELEC C110A MECH C110B CIRC C120 TLT C119A 33'-11" W3W3 W3 W3 8' - 0 " MA3 GB2 GA6 E-BM08 12'-0" C5 A5 . 1 0 1 F6 A5.101 E1 A5.101 F1 A5 . 1 0 1 F4 A5.101 E- B P 0 8 P08 E-BM08 E- B M 0 8 E-BM08 E- B M 0 8 E-BM08 E- B P 0 8 E-BP08 E- B P 0 8 GA6 GA6 P08 GA6 GA6 GA 6 GA 6 20 ' - 8 " 16'-0" E-BM08 E-BM08 GA6 GA6 GA6 10'-0 1/2" 9'-7 1/2" 20 ' - 0 " 2 2 ' - 8 " 5 4 ' - 1 " GB1 GB1 GB1 EX P . J T . 1' - 0 " EX P . J T . 1' - 0 " 2" MA3 MA3 MA3 STACKS C105 GENERAL NOTES: • ASSUME 2-HR FIRE WALL WHERE THE NEW CLASSROOM STORM SHELTER ADDITION MEETS THE EXISTING BUILDING. ALL OPENINGS AND PENETRATIONS WILL REQUIRE 90MIN FIRE RATING. • ALL NEW ROOF TOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT WILL REQUIRE ROOF MOUNTED EQUIPMENT SCREENS. 2" 34 ' - 0 " 34 ' - 5 " 2 9 ' - 6 " EX I S T I N G FL O O R TE R R - 1 3' - 0 " 5'-3" 8'-0" 9' - 1 1 " 5 ' - 1 0 " 9 ' - 9 " 11 ' - 4 " 5 ' - 1 0 " 8 ' - 4 " CLASS C115 CIRC C110 CUST C118 GROUP C110A B1 0 8 C116EC119A C1 0 9 C118J C118H C1 1 9 C C117B C110A2 A4 5 6 C116C C1 1 5 B C114A C1 1 0 B C111A C1 1 3 A C1 1 8 C C1 1 0 A C1 1 2 A SW3 SL2 SW3 SL2 SW3 SL2 SW3 SL2 SW3 SL2 SW3 SL2 F6 A5.203 _______ 16 ' - 2 " 3 ' - 0 " _______C1 A4.105 TLT C118B TLT C118C TLT C118F TLT C118G TLT C118H TLT C118D 3' - 0 " 33 ' - 8 " 10 ' - 2 " 8' - 3 " 15 ' - 1 1 " 1 0 ' - 0 " 15 ' - 0 " 1 0 ' - 8 " 16'-6" 5'-0" 2'-6" 1 2 4 5 3 8 7 6 9 10 11 12 J K 13 14 15 16 L NM N.2 P Q R S U VT 25 ' - 8 " MBD 8'-0" MBD 8'-0" MBD 6'-0" MBD 6'-0" MBD 6'-0" MBD 6'-0" MBD 6'-0" MBD 6'-0" MBD 8'-0" MBD 8'-0" MBD 8'-0" MBD 8'-0" 33'-8" TLT C118A TLT C118E TOILET C116C SF2 CW3 CW3 CW4 ? ? ? B1 1 2 A GS - C 1 1 5 A GS-C117 GS-C116 GS-C114A GS - C 1 1 2 GS - C 1 1 4 B GS - C 1 1 5 B GS - C 1 1 3 GS - C 1 1 5 C C117C C117A C116A C116B C115A C115C C1 1 8 B C 1 1 8 A C1 1 8 G C1 1 8 F C1 1 8 E C118 E-BM08 E-BP08 E-BM08 P08 MA3 8' - 0 " (31 ) LT #1 (7 ) L T # 1 MECH C108 C101BC101A 3' - 0 " 1.8 R.1N.1 9.1 8.5 L.1 L.2 22 36 " F7 A5 . 1 0 1 6' - 6 " 9 ' - 2 " 4" SMTV (NIC) SMTV (NIC) SMTV (NIC) SMTV (NIC) SMTV (NIC) SMTV (NIC) SMTV (NIC) C1 A5.203 _______ F6 A5.202 _______F3 A5.202 _______ F5 A5.202 _______ F2 A5.203 _______ F1 A5.203 _______ C2 A5.203 _______ F7 A5.203 _______ F1 A5.202 _______ F2 A5.202 _______ F5 A5.203 _______ C7 A5.203 _______ C3 A5.203 _______ F3 A5.203 _______ C6 A5.203 _______ C5 A5.203 _______ C6 A5.202 _______C8 A5.202 _______ A4.402B4 A4.402 D1a A1 B1 A4 E1aE5 D5a _______D7 A4.105 A5.103E5 A5.103 E5 SI M A5.103 E5 SI M 23 23 A5.103 E5 SI M A5.103 E5SIM A5.103 E5SIM A5.103 E6 MA3 MA3 E-BM08 E-BP08 E-BM08 E-BM08 GA6 GA6 GA6 GA6 GA6 GA6 GA6 MA3 GA6 GA6 3' - 0 " GB1 3'-0" 6'-0" GA6 GA6 GA6 5' - 6 " 2 ' - 0 " 17 ' - 0 " 5 ' - 8 " 17 ' - 6 " 6'-10" 3'-2" 5'-4" 3'-2" 7'-0" GA6 GB1 GB1 GA6 GA6 GA6 GS-C110A GS - C 1 1 0 B GA6 GA8GA8 GA6 GA6 P08 MA3 GA6 P08 GA6 MA3 GA6 GA6 A4.402 F3 F1 05 16 16 1616 EWC DOUBLE WITH BOTTLE FILLER OW -C1 1 6 OW-C113 TE R R - 1 TE R R - 1 TERR-1 CPT-1 CAREFULLY REINSTALL EXISTING ROLLING BOOK STACKS. C120 CPT-1 CPT-1 EXIST CPT-1EXIST CPT-2 CP T - 1 CP T - 2 FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTES: 01 HCAP DOOR ACTUATOR - SEE ELECTRICAL FOR ROUGH-IN 02 STEEL PIPE BOLLARD - SEE DETAIL 03 PATCH FLOOR AS INDICATED BY HATCH TO MATCH EXISTING FLOOR. 04 CAN WASH - SEE DETAIL . SEE ALSO MECHANICAL 05 MOP SINK - SEE MECHANICAL 06 CABINET UNIT HEATER. SEE DETAIL 43046. SEE MECH. FOR SPECIFICATIONS, COORDINATE LOCATION WITH MECHANICAL 07 CARD READER - SEE ELECTRICAL 08 INSTALL EXISTING RE-LOCATED ELECTRIC CHANGING TABLE. SEE ELECTRICAL. 09 LOCATION OF STACKED WASHER AND DRYER (NIC) - SEE MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL FOR ROUGH-IN 10 RE-INSTALL EXISTING MARKERBOARDS, TACKBOARDS, SMTV, SMARTBOARDS AS INDICATED ON FLOOR PLAN. COORDINATE WITH DEMOLITION PLANS. SEE ALSO ELECTRICAL. B3/A6.001 D7/A4.706 11 STEEL PIPE RAIL / RAILING, FIELD PAINTED 12 STEEL LADDER, FIELD PAINTED - SEE 61014 & 61025 13 EXTERIOR LIGHTING - SEE ELECTRICAL 14 EXTERIOR SIGNAGE 15 FIELD PAINTED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT - SEE MECHANICAL 16 TOOTH-IN MASONRY AT REMOVED EXTENTS PER THE DEMOLITION PLAN TO MATCH EXISTING COURSING. 17 CORNER GUARD 18 DOCK BUMPER - SEE DETAIL 19 PAINT TO MATCH EXISTING. REFER TO PLAN FOR EXTENTS INDICATED. 20 INSTALL EXISTING LOCKERS. PROVIDE NEW FINSHED END PANEL TO EXTENTS INDICATED ON PLAN, COLOR NOTED BY ARCHITECT. D5/A6.001 21 INFILL EXISTING SLAB ON GRADE TO EXTENTS INDICATED BY HATCH. COORDINATE REMAINING SLAB DIMENSIONS WITH FOOD SERVICE EQUIPMENT. 22 PROVIDE BLACK LAMINATE COUNTERTOP TRIM AT AREA OF REMOVED COUNTERTOP. 23 STORM-RATED SHUTTER. SEE PLAN FOR WIDTH. F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: Scale: WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000 St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 woldae.com | 651 227 7773 # 6/ 2 / 2 0 2 5 3 : 0 0 : 4 8 P M Au t o d e s k D o c s : / / 2 4 2 2 2 4 - I S D 8 3 3 - P i n e H i l l E l e m e n ta r y S c h o o l A d d i t i o n a n d R e n o v a t i o n / 2 4 2 2 2 4 - P i n e H il l El e m e n t a r y S c h o o l A d d i t i o n a n d R e n o v a t i o n . r v t 1/8" = 1'-0" ISD #833 Pine Hill Elementary School Addition and Renovation A2.01c MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - AREA C 8400 E. Point Douglas Rd S., Cottage Grove, MN 55016 9015 Hadley Ave S, Cottage Grove, MN 55016 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DD ESTIMATE Checker Author Issue Date 242224 0 1/8" = 1'-0" MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - AREA CF1 6' 12' KEY PLAN A B C FLOOR PLAN GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL PLAN DIMENSIONS ARE NOMINAL TO FACE OF WALL. WALL THICKNESSES ARE SHOWN NOMINAL, SEE WALL TYPES FOR ACTUAL THICKNESS. 2. ALL GWB / METAL STUD WALLS ARE TO BE 5 INCHES THICK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3. ALL CONCRETE BLOCK WALLS ARE TO BE 8 INCHES THICK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. COORDINATE SIZE AND LOCATION OF ALL DUCT AND SHAFT OPENINGS IN WALLS AND FLOORS W/ MECH. AND ELEC. PROVIDE ALL REQUIRED LINTELS FOR OPENINGS. SEE LINTEL SCHEDULE. 5. FIELD VERIFY ALL MILLWORK OPENINGS. 6. SET FLOOR DRAINS 3/4" BELOW FINISHED CONCRETE FLOORS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PROVIDE CONSISTENT SLOPE FROM WALL TO DRAIN BY SLOPING CONCRETE, MIN. 1/4" PER FOOT. 7. VERIFY LOCATION, SIZE AND QUANTITY OF ALL EQUIPMENT PADS WITH MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL. 8. ALL DOOR / SIDELITE OPENINGS TO BEGIN 4" FROM ADJACENT WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 9. ALL GWB / METAL STUD WALLS ARE CENTERED ON GRID UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 10. FIRE RATED WALLS ARE INDICATED ON CODE PLANS. Revisions Description Date Num ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE - AREA B ROOM NO ROOM NAME FLOOR BASE N WALL - TYP E WALL S WALL W WALL REMARKSMATL FIN MATL FIN MATL FIN MATL FIN C101 MEDIA EXIST. CPT-1 EXIST C105 STACKS TERR-1 EXIST. C107 OFFICE TERR-1 EXIST. C108 MECH EXIST. EXIST. C109 RESOURCE TERR-1 PT-6A 1 C110 CIRC CPT-1, CPT-2, CPT-3 VB-1 PT-6A GWB/CONC WP-1 WP-1 1 C110A ELEC PT CONC. VB-1 -- 1 C110A GROUP TERR-1 GWB PT-6A 1 C110B MECH PT CONC. VB-1 -- 1 C111 CIRC CPT-1, CPT-2, CPT-3 VB-1 PT-6A WP-1 WP-1 1 C112 CLASS TERR-1 VB-1 PT-6A 1 C113 CLASS TERR-1 VB-1 PT-6A 1 C114 CLASS TERR-1 VB-1 PT-6A 1 C115 CLASS TERR-1 VB-1 PT-6A 1 C116 CLASS TERR-1 VB-1 PT-6A 1 C116C TOILET PTILE-1 CTILE-1 CTILE-1 1 C117 CLASS TERR-1 VB-1 PT-6A 1 C118 CUST PT CONC. FRP CONC PT-6A 1 C118A TLT PTILE-1 CTILE-1 CTILE-1 1 C118B TLT PTILE-1 CTILE-1 CTILE-1 1 C118C TLT PTILE-1 CTILE-1 CTILE-1 1 C118D TLT PTILE-1 CTILE-1 CTILE-1 1 C118E TLT PTILE-1 CTILE-1 CTILE-1 1 C118F TLT PTILE-1 CTILE-1 CTILE-1 1 C118G TLT PTILE-1 CTILE-1 CTILE-1 1 C118H TLT PTILE-1 CTILE-1 CTILE-1 1 C119 CIRC TERR-1 VB-1 CONC PT-6A C119A TLT PTILE-1 CTILE-1 CTILE-1 1 C120 CIRC TERR-1 VB-1 CONC PT-6A 1 DOOR / OPENING SCHEDULE DOOR NO DOOR / OPENING LABEL/ RATING OVERALL WIDTH FRAME GL MOUNTING CONDITIONS HDW GRP REMARKSTYPE QTY WIDTH HEIGHT MATL TYPE DEPTH MATL HEAD JAMB SILL C101A AL2 1 3'-0" 7'-0" AL -- 3'-0" CW X -- AL -- C101B AL2 1 3'-0" 7'-0" AL -- 3'-0" CW X -- AL -- C109 F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-4" FR1A -- AL -- C110A F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-4" FR1A -- AL -- C110A2 F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-4" FR1A -- AL -- C110B F 2 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 6'-4" FR 1 -- AL -- C111A AL2 1 3'-0" 7'-0" FRP -- 3'-0" CW X -- AL -- C112A N 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 4'-8" FR 3A -- AL -- C113A N 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 4'-8" FR 3A -- AL -- C114A N 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 4'-8" FR 3A -- AL -- C115A F 1 6'-0" 11" HM -- 6'-4" FR 1 -- AL -- C115B N 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 4'-8" FR 3A -- AL -- C115C F 1 6'-0" 11" HM -- 6'-4" FR 1 -- AL -- C116A F 1 6'-0" 11" HM -- 6'-4" FR 1 -- AL -- C116B F 1 6'-0" 11" HM -- 6'-4" FR 1 -- AL -- C116C N 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 4'-8" FR 3A -- AL -- C116E F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-4" FR1A -- AL -- C117A F 1 6'-0" 11" HM -- 6'-4" FR 1 -- AL -- C117B N 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 4'-8" FR 3A -- AL -- C117C F 1 6'-0" 11" HM -- 6'-4" FR 1 -- AL -- C118 F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-4" FR1A -- AL -- C118A F 1 2'-8" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-0" FR1A -- AL -- C118B F 1 2'-8" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-0" FR1A -- AL -- C118C F 1 2'-8" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-0" FR1A -- AL -- C118E F 1 2'-8" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-0" FR1A -- AL -- C118F F 1 2'-8" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-0" FR1A -- AL -- C118G F 1 2'-8" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-0" FR1A -- AL -- C118H F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-4" FR1A -- AL -- C118J F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-4" FR1A -- AL -- C119A F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 3'-4" FR1A -- AL -- C119C F 2 3'-0" 7'-0" HM -- 6'-4" FR 1 -- AL -- C120 F 1 3'-0" 7'-0" FRP -- 3'-4" FR1A -- HM -- Glass Systems Schedule MARK TYPE OVERALL WIDTH OVERALL HEIGHT DOOR WIDTH NUMBER OF FIXED PANELS REMARKS GS-C110A 151 8'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" 2 GS-C110B 151 12'-0" 8'-0" 12'-0" 3 GS-C112 192 4'-6" 8'-0" 4'-0" 1 GS-C113 192 4'-6" 8'-0" 4'-0" 1 GS-C114A 191 12'-0" 8'-0" 3'-0" 1 GS-C114B 192 3'-0" 8'-0" 4'-0" 1 GS-C115A 191 12'-0" 8'-0" 3'-0" 1 GS-C115B 192 3'-0" 8'-0" 4'-0" 1 GS-C115C 192 3'-0" 8'-0" 4'-0" 1 GS-C116 191 12'-0" 8'-0" 3'-0" 1 GS-C117 191 12'-0" 8'-0" 3'-0" 1 Operable Partition Schedule Number Type Height Length Panel Quantity Panel Material CITY PLANNING SET T.O. MEZZANINE 119'-9 3/8" BASEML 100'-0" MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREEN NP L.2 BRICK 1 - COMMON BOND PATTERN T.O. MEZZANINE 119'-9 3/8" BASEML 100'-0" ALUMNINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREEN 2122232425 ALUMNINUM CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM BRICK 1 - COMMON BOND PATTERN T.O. MEZZANINE 119'-9 3/8" BASEML 100'-0" MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREEN L N PL.1 BRICK 1 - COMMON BOND PATTERN BASEML 100'-0" T.O. ML 110'-2 5/8" 24 BRICK 1 - COMMON BOND PATTERN T.O. MEZZANINE 119'-9 3/8" BASEML 100'-0" T.O. ML 110'-2 5/8" E F G BRICK 1 - COMMON BOND PATTERN BASEML 100'-0" T.O. ML 110'-2 5/8" 24 26 BRICK 1 - COMMON BOND PATTERN T.O. MEZZANINE 119'-9 3/8" BASEML 100'-0" T.O. ML 110'-2 5/8" T.O. MEDIA 115'-4" STORM SHELTER 24'-8" STORM SHELTER 63'-0" STORM-RATED LOUVER STORM-RATED WINDOW ALUMINUM CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM 6'-0" 2' - 0 " 1' - 3 " 5' - 1 " JKLNMN.2PQRSUVTR.1 N.1 L.1L.2 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREEN BRICK 1 - COMMON BOND PATTERN BRICK 1 - COMMON BOND PATTERN BRICK 1 - RUNNING BOND PATTERN BRICK 1 - RUNNING BOND PATTERN BASEML 100'-0" T.O. MEDIA 115'-4" STORM SHELTER 76'-10" 1 3 8 91.8 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREEN BRICK 1 - COMMON BOND PATTERN BASEML 100'-0" T.O. MEDIA 115'-4" STORM SHELTER 20'-0" 1261112 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREEN BRICK 1 - COMMON BOND PATTERN BRICK 1 - RUNNING BOND PATTERN BASEML 100'-0" T.O. ML 110'-2 5/8" L.1 BRICK 1 - COMMON BOND PATTERN BASEML 100'-0" T.O. MEDIA 115'-4" ALUMINUM CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM U VTR.1 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREEN BRICK 1 - COMMON BOND PATTERN BASEML 100'-0" T.O. MEDIA 115'-4" 11 12 BRICK 1 - COMMON BOND PATTERN T.O. MEZZANINE 119'-9 3/8" BASEML 100'-0" 21 23 25 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREEN BRICK 1 - COMMON BOND PATTERN F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN Check: Drawn: Date: Comm: Scale: WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000 St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 woldae.com | 651 227 7773 # 6/ 2 / 2 0 2 5 3 : 0 2 : 4 5 P M Au t o d e s k D o c s : / / 2 4 2 2 2 4 - I S D 8 3 3 - P i n e H i l l E l e m e n ta r y S c h o o l A d d i t i o n a n d R e n o v a t i o n / 2 4 2 2 2 4 - P i n e H il l El e m e n t a r y S c h o o l A d d i t i o n a n d R e n o v a t i o n . r v t 1/8" = 1'-0" ISD #833 Pine Hill Elementary School Addition and Renovation A5.101 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 8400 E. Point Douglas Rd S., Cottage Grove, MN 55016 9015 Hadley Ave S, Cottage Grove, MN 55016 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DD ESTIMATE JPC CL Issue Date 242224 Revisions Description Date Num 0 1/8" = 1'-0" GYM ADDITION - NORTH ELEVATIONB1 6' 12'0 1/8" = 1'-0" GYM ADDITION - EAST ELEVATIONB3 6' 12'0 1/8" = 1'-0" GYM ADDITION - SOUTH ELEVATIONB5 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" KITCHEN ADDITION - EAST ELEVATIONC1 6' 12'0 1/8" = 1'-0" KITCHEN ADDITION - SOUTH ELEVATIONC2 6' 12'0 1/8" = 1'-0" KITCHEN ADDITION - WEST ELEVATIONC4 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" CLASSROOM ADDITION - NORTH ELEVATIONE1 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" CLASSROOM ADDITION - WEST ELEVATIONC5 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" CLASSROOM ADDITION - EAST ELEVATIONF1 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" COURTYARD - SOUTH ELEVATIONF6 6' 12'0 1/8" = 1'-0" CLASSROOM ADDITION - SOUTH ELEVATIONF4 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" CLASSROOM ADDITION - WEST ELEVATIONF7 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" GYM ADDITION - WEST ELEVATIONB7 6' 12' CITY PLANNING SET RESOLUTION NO. 00-144 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR EXPANSION OF THE SCHOOL USE AND A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDITION TO PINE HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, 9015 HADLEY AVENUE SOUTH WHEREAS, A T S& R Architects applied for a conditional use permit for expansion of the school use and a site plan review for construction of an addition to Pine Hill Elementary School, on property Iegally described as: The North 628.93 feet of tne West 725.60 feet of the Northwest Quarter (NW1/4) of the Northwest Quarter (NW1/4) of Section Twenty (20), Township Twenty- seven (27) North, Range Twenty-one (21) West, subject to Cherry Avenue on and across the Westerly 33 feet thereof, containing 10.476 acres, more or less. The South 188.68 feet of the North 817.61 feet of the West 725.60 feet of the Northwest Quarter of tne Northwest Quarter (NW1/4 of NW1/4) of Section Twenty (20), Township Twenty-seven (27) North, Range Twenty-one (21) West, subject to Cherry Avenue on and across the Westerly 33 feet thereof containing 3.143 acres, more or less. Commonly known as 9015 Hadley Avenue South, Cottage Grove, Washington County, State of Minnesota. WHEREAS, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within 500 feet of the property and a public hearing notice was published in the South Washington County Bulletin; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 24, 2000; and WHEREAS, the public hearing was open for public testimony and no one spoke for or against the proposal. The applicant was present at the meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission unanimously approved the application, subject to certain conditions listed below. Resolution 00-144 Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESO VED, the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, Washington County, Minnesota hereby approves the conditional use permit application filed by A T S& R Architects for expansion of the school use and a site plan review for construction of an addition to Pine Hill Elementary School, subject to the following conditions: A building permit and commercial plan review packet shall be completed, sub- mitted, and approved by the City prior to the commencement of any construction activities. Detailed construction plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Building Ocial and Fire Marshall. 2. Silt fencing shall be installed around the entire perimeter of the building at the construction limits. 3. A cash contribution sufficient to create stormwater management mitigation else- where shali be required. The mitigation shall be in the amount equai to the total estimated cost of the construction of an infiltration basin that would meet the standards of the National Urban Runoff Program plus land costs. Said contribution shall be paid at the time of the building permit application. 4. A revised landscaping pla detailing the addition of 6 deciduous overstory tree: and 6 six-foot coniferous trees to the area adjacent to the new addition is required. The revised landscaping plan shall be submitted to the City and approved prior to the release of a building permit. No financial guarantee will be required, but the required landscaping materials shall be replaced if they do not survive. 5. Any new roof top mechanical equipment on the site shall be screened prior to the certificate of occupancy for the addition. 6. A trash enclosure that meets the criteria established in Section 28-39 shall be provided for all exterior trash and recyclable containers. Construction of the enclosure shall be compieted prior to the release of a certificate of occupancy. Al! oGtdoor lightins shal! be directed downvrard and avvay from abutting aro erky. 8. Application for the extension of the interim conditional use permit for the two modular temporary buildings shall be made with the City prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the new addition. Passed this 16th day of August, 2000. John D. enzer, Mayor Attest: L L 'c.`- . y Caron M. Stransky, City Clerl Ch.eryl Am Kahls; Mayar Pro Tem 3119182 Office of the County Recorder Washington County, MN Certifled illed andior recorded on: 2000/09I05 11:34:00 AM 3119182 1 A°O"°rA Cindy I(onemann i _ Caunty Recorder JCf' ' .. '-,p j Ci Ie I -- BY STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF WASHINGTON I CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY, that I have carefully compared the attached copy of Resolution No. 00-144 of the City of Cottage I Grove with the original on file in my office and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom.I WITNESS, my hand as such City Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this 18th day of August, 2000. L u.t1/' Caron M. Stransky I c o r r, °° City Clerk a,,o c o m a a ' po" ., IIr+ 111'-I 4/ ` } I f ` ' ."? a ';,` f'; r i'r a ,_ 1 }:,, ` h , ' i i , ,",' \' : 4 L . ., , n 1 v+L F:\GROUPS\PLANNING12000\Planning Cases\057CUP Pine Hill Add-ju124\057CUP Pine Hill Add Res No 00-144 recording cover.doc EF-1 EF-3 EF-4 EF-2 (E)AHU-2 (E)VTR (E)VTR (E) RD-1 (E) RD-1 (E)EF (E)VTR 24x18 SA 24x18 RA AHU-5 (E ) 3 0 x 4 0 R A (E ) 3 0 x 4 0 S A 24x20 RA (E)24x40 (E)30x40 (E)30x24 (E)24x40 (E)48 x 2 8 (E)48x28 (E)14x1 4 3,000 SF 6" ORD-1 3,000 SF 6" RD-1 550 SF 3" ORD-1 550 SF 3" RD-1 3" VTR 950 SF 4" RD-1 950 SF 4" ORD-1 950 SF 4" RD-1 950 SF 4" ORD-1 350 SF 3" ORD-1 350 SF 3" RD-1 (E)VTR 3" VTR EF-7 (E)EF (E)EF EF-9 RH-1 EF-8 30x16 RA 30 x 1 6 S A 30x16 RA DN 30x10 SA DN 30x18 RA DN 30x18 SA DN 12x14 SA DN 12x14 SA DN 30x18 SA 30x18 RA 30 x 1 8 R A 30 x 1 8 S A 12 x 1 4 S A 12 x 1 4 S A 46 x 2 4 S A 18x24 RA 24 x 1 8 S A 46x24 SA 12 x 1 2 S A 24x18 SA 24x18 RA AHU-4 AHU-3 10x10 SA DN 8'16'4'01/8" = 1'-0"M4.01a 1 ROOF MECHANICAL PLAN - AREA A 670 County Road B West St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 Tel: (651) 771-0880 Email: kfi@kfi-eng.com F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 M MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: Scale: WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS NOT F O R C O NSTRUC T IO N 332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000 St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 woldae.com | 651 227 7773 # KEY PLAN A 8400 E. Point Douglas Rd S., Cottage Grove, MN 55016 DATE: REG. NO.: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF PRINT NAME: 8/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 4 8 : 0 2 P M Au t o d e s k D o c s : / / 2 4 2 2 2 4 - I S D 8 3 3 - P i n e H i l l E l e m e n ta r y S c h o o l A d d i t i o n a n d R e n o v a t i o n / M P 2 4 _ S o W a s h C o P in e Hi l l s E S B o n d I m p r o v e m e n t s . r v t 1/8" = 1'-0" ISD #833 Pine Hill Elementary School Addition and Renovation M4.01a ROOF MECHANICAL PLAN - AREA A 9015 Hadley Ave S, Cottage Grove, MN 55016 CD ESTIMATE ZJW BJP 08/29/2025 23-1594.00 CD E STI M A T E NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 08/29/2025 MINNESOTA Mech Eng of Record 11111 KEYNOTES Revisions Description Date Num EF-5 (E)EF (E)VTR (E)VTR (E)VTR (E)VTR (E)VTR (E)VTR (E ) 3 0 x 3 0 R A (E ) 3 0 x 4 0 S A (E ) 3 0 x 2 0 R A (E ) 2 2 x 4 0 S A (E ) 2 8 x 1 4 S A (E ) 2 8 x 1 2 R A (E ) 3 0 x 4 0 R A (E ) 3 0 x 4 0 S A (E)20x16 (E)20x16 (E)20x16 (E)20x16 3" VTR (E)VTR 1,450 SF 4" ORD-1 1,450 SF 4" RD-1 8'16'4'01/8" = 1'-0"M4.01b 1 ROOF MECHANICAL PLAN - AREA B 670 County Road B West St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 Tel: (651) 771-0880 Email: kfi@kfi-eng.com F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 M MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: Scale: WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS NOT F O R C O NSTRUC T IO N 332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000 St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 woldae.com | 651 227 7773 # KEY PLAN B 8400 E. Point Douglas Rd S., Cottage Grove, MN 55016 DATE: REG. NO.: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF PRINT NAME: D 8/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 4 8 : 0 5 P M Au t o d e s k D o c s : / / 2 4 2 2 2 4 - I S D 8 3 3 - P i n e H i l l E l e m e n ta r y S c h o o l A d d i t i o n a n d R e n o v a t i o n / M P 2 4 _ S o W a s h C o P in e Hi l l s E S B o n d I m p r o v e m e n t s . r v t 1/8" = 1'-0" ISD #833 Pine Hill Elementary School Addition and Renovation M4.01b ROOF MECHANICAL PLAN - AREA B 9015 Hadley Ave S, Cottage Grove, MN 55016 CD ESTIMATE ZJW BJP 08/29/2025 23-1594.00 CD E STI M A T E NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 08/29/2025 MINNESOTA Mech Eng of Record 11111 KEYNOTES Revisions Description Date Num EF-6 (E)RH (E)IH (E)RH- (E) RD-1 (E)CU (E)EF AHU-6 (E)6" RD-1 2,200 SF 6" RD-1 2,200 SF 6" ORD-11,400 SF 4" ORD-1 1,400 SF 4" RD-1 1,900 SF 4" RD-1 1,900 SF 4" ORD-1 600 SF 3" RD-1 600 SF 3" ORD-1 4" VTR 5,900 SF 8" ORD-1 5,900 SF 8" RD-1 900 SF 4" RD-1 900 SF 4" ORD-1 265 SF 3" ORD-1 265 SF 3" RD-1 3" VTR 750 SF 3" RD-1 750 SF 3" ORD-1 4" VTR RH-2 RH-3 8'16'4'01/8" = 1'-0"M4.01c 1 ROOF MECHANICAL PLAN - AREA C 670 County Road B West St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 Tel: (651) 771-0880 Email: kfi@kfi-eng.com F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 M MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: Scale: WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS NOT F O R C O NSTRUC T IO N 332 Minnesota Street, Suite W2000 St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 woldae.com | 651 227 7773 # KEY PLAN C 8400 E. Point Douglas Rd S., Cottage Grove, MN 55016 DATE: REG. NO.: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF PRINT NAME: 8/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 4 8 : 0 8 P M Au t o d e s k D o c s : / / 2 4 2 2 2 4 - I S D 8 3 3 - P i n e H i l l E l e m e n ta r y S c h o o l A d d i t i o n a n d R e n o v a t i o n / M P 2 4 _ S o W a s h C o P in e Hi l l s E S B o n d I m p r o v e m e n t s . r v t 1/8" = 1'-0" ISD #833 Pine Hill Elementary School Addition and Renovation M4.01c ROOF MECHANICAL PLAN - AREA C 9015 Hadley Ave S, Cottage Grove, MN 55016 CD ESTIMATE ZJW BJP 08/29/2025 23-1594.00 CD E STI M A T E NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 08/29/2025 MINNESOTA Mech Eng of Record 11111 KEYNOTES Revisions Description Date Num E1 A5.101 B5 A5.101 B1 A5 . 1 0 1 B2 A5.101 F1 A5.101 F4 A5.101 ELEVATION KEY B7 A5.101 C1 A5.101 C3 A5.101 C2 A5.101 C5 A5.101 F6 A5.101 F7 A5.101 BASEML 100'-0" NP T.O. ML NEW 112'-4" GYM ADDITION 122'-2" 8' - 8 " BRICK LEDGE 99'-4" EJ 2" 04.01 04.02 08.31 03.0404.99 04.99 07.92 07.92 T.O. MEZZANINE 119'-9 3/8" BASEML 100'-0" 2125 T.O. ML NEW 112'-4" GYM ADDITION 122'-2" BRICK LEDGE 99'-4" EJ 2" 04.99 04.02 03.0404.99 04.01 04.99 04.99 04.99 04.99 26.9107.92 26.91 08.12 BASEML 100'-0" L N PL.1 T.O. ML NEW 112'-4" GYM ADDITION 122'-2" BRICK LEDGE 99'-4" _______C7 A5.902 EJ 2"04.01 04.99 04.9904.0204.0103.0404.9926.91 07.92 07.9208.04 BASEML 100'-0" 24 T.O. ML NEW 112'-4" BRICK LEDGE 99'-4" EJ 2"04.99 04.01 07.92 BASEML 100'-0" E F T.O. ML NEW 112'-4" BRICK LEDGE 99'-4" _______C7 A5.902 04.99 04.01 04.99 04.9907.92 26.9108.04 BASEML 100'-0" 24 T.O. ML NEW 112'-4" BRICK LEDGE 99'-4" EJ 2"04.01 04.9904.9907.92 BASEML 100'-0" T.O. MEDIA 115'-4" MN.2TUR.1 N.1 T.O. ML NEW 112'-4" BRICK LEDGE 99'-4" _______C7 A5.902 _______C7 A5.902 GYM ADDITION NORTH ELEVATION SEE B1/A5.101 _______C7 A5.902 EJ 2" 04.99 04.01 04.99 04.99 04.9904.99 03.0404.9904.99 03.0404.0104.99 04.0104.9904.9904.9904.9904.99 03.0404.9904.9904.9904.9904.99 04.9904.99 03.0404.02 04.02 07.92 26.91 07.92 22.81 08.31 08.14 08.1308.13 08.14 08.14 08.13 08.13 08.14 08.12 08.1226.91 BASEML 100'-0" T.O. MEDIA 115'-4" 1 3 8 91.8 11 GYM ADDITION 122'-2" BRICK LEDGE 99'-4" BUILDING INTERIOR EJ 8" 5' - 2 " 5'-0" 4'-0" 04.99 04.99 04.99 04.99 04.99 04.0104.99 5.1 07.92 22.81 BASEML 100'-0" T.O. MEDIA 115'-4" 11211 GYM ADDITION 122'-2" BRICK LEDGE 99'-4" 5' - 0 " 1 ' - 8 " 4'-0" 5'-0" _______C7 A5.902 04.01 04.9904.9904.99 04.9904.99 03.0404.9904.9904.99 04.9904.9904.99 04.0104.02 5.1 22.81 07.92 08.31 BASEML 100'-0" L.1 T.O. ML NEW 112'-4" BRICK LEDGE 99'-4" EJ 2" _______C7 A5.902 04.9904.01 26.91 07.92 BASEML 100'-0" T.O. MEDIA 115'-4" ALUMINUM CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM T UR.1 BRICK LEDGE 99'-4" _______C7 A5.902 04.99 04.99 04.99 04.99 04.99 04.9904.0108.26 22.81 26.91 07.92 BASEML 100'-0" T.O. MEDIA 115'-4" 12 BRICK LEDGE 99'-4" 04.9904.0107.92 BASEML 100'-0" 21 25 T.O. ML NEW 112'-4" GYM ADDITION 122'-2" BRICK LEDGE 99'-4" BUILDING INTERIOR 04.99 04.01 04.99 04.9907.92 F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN Check: Drawn: Date: Comm: Scale: WOLD ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 50 South 6th Street, Suite 2250 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 woldae.com | 612 772 9025 # 8/ 2 9 / 2 0 2 5 2 : 2 6 : 2 8 P M Au t o d e s k D o c s : / / 2 4 2 2 2 4 - I S D 8 3 3 - P i n e H i l l E l e m e n ta r y S c h o o l A d d i t i o n a n d R e n o v a t i o n / 2 4 2 2 2 4 - P i n e H il l El e m e n t a r y S c h o o l A d d i t i o n a n d R e n o v a t i o n . r v t As indicated ISD #833 Pine Hill Elementary School Addition and Renovation A5.101 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 8400 E. Point Douglas Rd S., Cottage Grove, MN 55016 9015 Hadley Ave S, Cottage Grove, MN 55016 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CD DOCUMENTS JPC HD 08/29/2025 242224 MATERIALS KEY KEY MATERIAL 03.04 ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST CONCRETE 04.01 BRICK'RED-1' COMMON BOND 04.02 BRICK'TAN-1' STACKED BOND 04.99 BRICK EXPANSION JOINT 07.92 PREFINISHED METAL COPING 08.04 ANODIZED ALUMINUM DOOR 08.12 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM. SEE FLOOR PLAN. 08.13 STORM-RATED WINDOW. SEE FLOOR PLAN. 08.14 STORM-RATED LOUVER AS SPECIFIED. 08.26 ALUMINUM CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM 08.31 ANODIZED ALUMINUM WINDOW 22.81 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREEN. SEE MECHANICAL. 26.91 EXTERIOR LIGHT WITH WATER-TIGHT SEAL. REFER TO ELECTRICAL. 0 1/8" = 1'-0" GYM ADDITION - NORTH ELEVATIONB1 6' 12'0 1/8" = 1'-0" GYM ADDITION - EAST ELEVATIONB2 6' 12'0 1/8" = 1'-0" GYM ADDITION - SOUTH ELEVATIONB5 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" KITCHEN ADDITION - EAST ELEVATIONC1 6' 12'0 1/8" = 1'-0" KITCHEN ADDITION - SOUTH ELEVATIONC2 6' 12'0 1/8" = 1'-0" KITCHEN ADDITION - WEST ELEVATIONC3 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" CLASSROOM ADDITION - NORTH ELEVATIONE1 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" CLASSROOM ADDITION - WEST ELEVATIONC5 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" CLASSROOM ADDITION - EAST ELEVATIONF1 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" COURTYARD - SOUTH ELEVATIONF6 6' 12'0 1/8" = 1'-0" CLASSROOM ADDITION - SOUTH ELEVATIONF4 6' 12'0 1/8" = 1'-0" CLASSROOM ADDITION - WEST ELEVATIONF7 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" GYM ADDITION - WEST ELEVATIONB7 6' 12' Revisions Description Date Num Existing Exterior Language B r i c k CLASSROOM ADDITION B r i c k CLASSROOM ADDITION B r i c k CLASSROOM ADDITION B r i c k GYM ADDITION B r i c k GYM ADDITION SCHEDULE Design: February – September 2025 Bidding: October 2025 Construction: Spring 2026 – Summer 2027 Pine Hill Elementary School 1 City Council Action Request 11.A. Meeting Date 9/17/2025 Department Community Development Agenda Category Action Item Title Park Grove Library Staff Recommendation 1) Adopt Resolution 2025-144 approving a Site Plan Review for a building addition, façade remodel, and exterior site improvements at Park Grove Library. 2) Adopt the Development Agreement with Washington County, subject to minor modifications as approved by the City Attorney. Budget Implication N/A Attachments 1. Park Grove Library CC Memo 2. Park Grove Library Resolution 2025-144 3. Park Grove Library Plans 4. Park Grove Library Development Agreement 5. Park Grove Library Stormwater Report 6. Park Grove Library Concept 7. Park Grove Library Open House Boards 8. Park Grove Library Plan Review Memo 2025-08-15 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Jennifer Levitt, City Administrator FROM: Samantha Pierret, Senior Planner DATE: September 10, 2025 RE: Park Grove Library – Site Plan Review Proposal Alliiance (Applicant), on behalf of Washington County (Property Owner), has submitted a site plan review application for a building addition, façade remodel, and exterior site improvements at Park Grove Library, 7900 Hemingway Avenue South. The addition will be a new second story over the entryway for utility and mechanical equipment . Additional site improvements proposed include interior remodel, parking lot reconfiguration, and landscaping improvements. Location Map Review Schedule Application Received: July 31, 2025 Application Accepted: August 6, 2025 Planning Commission Meeting: August 25, 2025 60-Day Review Deadline: October 5, 2025 Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Jennifer Levitt Park Grove Library – Site Plan Review September 17, 2025 Page 2 of 12 Background Washington County has proposed upgrading the existing Park Grove Library by remodeling the structure to improve flow and accommodate the diverse uses and users of the space. By moving mechanical and utility equipment to a new second story, space vacated by existing mechanical equipment will be used for staff workspace. The interior will be remodeled to impro ve meeting spaces; provide designated space for studying, meetings, and group activities; and improve patron and staff safety and security. The existing parking area will also be reconstructed to add additional spaces and improve traffic flow. The library remodel will meet the Washington County Library’s 2024 -2028 Strategic Plan Priorities to improve library service delivery, enhance physical spaces and technology infrastructure, and expand the reach of the library. The building and grounds upgrades will allow the library to expand engagement opportunities, programs offered at the library, and library services while providing a refreshed and welcoming space for the community. Planning Considerations Comprehensive Plan and Zoning The parcel is zoned R-6, High Density Residential District, and is guided Mixed Use in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Essential services for local, county, state, or federal government or public utility purposes are permitted uses within the R-6 zoning district. Future Land Use and Current Zoning Site Plan The Applicant is proposing a second story building addition on the front of the library. The addition will house utility and mechanical equipment to open space on the first floor for patrons and staff. The parking lot will also be reconfigured to add parking spaces by realigning the parking stalls to 90 degrees from angled stalls and removing the one-way traffic flow within the parking lot. Various landscaping improvements are also proposed. Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Jennifer Levitt Park Grove Library – Site Plan Review September 17, 2025 Page 3 of 12 Front of Library Exterior Layout Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Jennifer Levitt Park Grove Library – Site Plan Review September 17, 2025 Page 4 of 12 The existing building is 21,181 square feet. By updating the façade and removing building angles on the east and south sides of the building, the structure will be 20,355 square feet after renova - tions. An enhanced children’s area will be constructed on the south side of the building outside of the children’s area inside the library, and an outdoor reading terrace will be added on the west side of the building. Site Access The site has one access point off Hemingway Avenue on the north side of the property, across from 79th Street. The parking lot currently utilizes a one-way traffic pattern with traffic entering the parking lot using the east entrance and driving south to loop around and exit on the west side to head south to the exit on the east side. Existing Traffic Flow After construction, traffic will be able to flow in both directions through the parking lot; however, the entrance and exit point to the parking lot will remain in the same location. The site will also be more accessible for pedestrians along Hemingway Avenue via new sidewalk and stair connections to the sidewalk on Hemingway Avenue. Pedestrians will be able to utilize parking lot islands in the center of the parking lot as pedestrian refuge from vehicle traffic in the parking lot when moving to and from Hemingway Avenue. The north parking lot island will contain the USPS mailbox currently on site. Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Jennifer Levitt Park Grove Library – Site Plan Review September 17, 2025 Page 5 of 12 Access from Hemingway Avenue Parking Per City Code, libraries must have one space for each 300 square feet of floor area. The existing library is 21,181 square feet; therefore, 71 parking spaces are required. There are currently 50 spaces on site, most of which are angled spaces. The parking lot is proposed to be reconfigured to add parking spaces by realigning the parking spaces to 90-degree parking stalls and removing the one-way traffic flow within the parking lot. The remodeled library will be 20,355 square feet; therefore, 68 parking stalls are required. With the reconfiguration of the parking lot, 68 parking stalls will be provided on site. Access drives, drive aisles, and parking spaces for municipal facilities in all zoning districts must be set back 30 feet from front, side, and rear property lines. The existing parking lot setbacks are existing nonconformities at less than 5 feet from the north property line and 12 feet from the east and south property lines. The drive aisle and parking lot on the north side of the property will be relocated to be approximately 20 feet from the north property line. The parking area on the east and south sides of the property will be reconstructed in the existing 12-foot setback. Since the non-conforming parking lot is not being expanded and setbacks are not being decreased, a vari - ance is not required. Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Jennifer Levitt Park Grove Library – Site Plan Review September 17, 2025 Page 6 of 12 Proposed Parking Lot Hemingway Avenue Improvements In conjunction with the library upgrades and to improve pedestrian safety, Hemingway Avenue is proposed to be reconstructed in front of the library. The project is proposed to be designed and constructed by the City with a cost share agreement with the County. Curb bump-outs with integral pavers will be added for safer pedestrian crossings and traffic calm- ing at 79th Street and mid-block on Hemingway Avenue south of the proposed stairway connec - tion to the library property. Additionally, on-street parking spaces will be striped on both sides of Hemingway between the proposed bump-outs. These additional on-street parking options are imperative given the limited parking expansion space on the library site and the need for additional parking area. The right-of-way is proposed to be improved with additional street trees and en- hanced landscaping on the west side. The proposed bump-outs give the opportunity to introduce plant material near intersections using seasonal planters. Redesigning Hemingway to improve pedestrian access to the library will complement the other development and redevelopment pro- jects that have been completed in the neighborhood to date, including the Dunkin/Baskin Robbins development, Grove 80, and Bluestem Apartments. Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Jennifer Levitt Park Grove Library – Site Plan Review September 17, 2025 Page 7 of 12 Hemingway Avenue Tree Preservation City Code Title 11-3-13 requires completion of a tree inventory (all qualifying trees) within the project area of a proposed development. For projects in residential districts, 40 percent of the qualifying caliper inches on a site are permitted to be removed without required mitigation. The completed tree inventory identified 257 qualifying inches on site. The Applicant is proposing re- moval of 47 qualifying inches, which is under the permitted 40 percent removal; therefore, no mitigation is required. Landscaping The Applicant has submitted a detailed landscape plan including proposed additional landscaping throughout the site. Landscaping will be installed around the parking lot and within parking lot islands. Deciduous and coniferous trees will be planted in open space around the site. Existing trees will be preserved on the north side of the property and three coniferous trees will be planted for additional screening from residential properties to the north. The children’s area will feature a concrete sitting ring and retaining wall. The existing boulder will remain in the area and additional limestone boulders will be added for additional seating. A con - crete paved reading terrace with landscaping and seating will be added to the west side of the building with access from inside the library. Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Jennifer Levitt Park Grove Library – Site Plan Review September 17, 2025 Page 8 of 12 Sitting Ring City Code Title 11-3-12 requires all non-residential uses in residential districts to meet minimum vegetation requirements for Business and Industrial zones. A minimum of 30 percent of the site must remain as open/green space. The site is proposed to have approximately 52 percent open/green space in compliance with City Code. The number of trees and shrubs required is calculated by multiplying newly disturbed areas by the coefficients found in City Code. The amount of newly disturbed area on the site is minimal; however, the applicant is proposing to add vegeta- tion to the site that would equal the amount of vegetation required if the site were a vacant property with new development. Vegetation Type Proposed Required (If Site Was Vacant) Deciduous Overstory Trees 29 30 Coniferous Trees 51 28 Shrubs 244 65 Landscaping Plan Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Jennifer Levitt Park Grove Library – Site Plan Review September 17, 2025 Page 9 of 12 Fencing The Applicant is proposing a four-foot-tall black ornamental fence around the outdoor reading terrace and on the south and east side of the children’s area. An existing chain link fence along the west and north property lines will be removed after construction. Removal of the chain link fencing will increase accessibility to the library from existing residential properties to the north and the Woodland Park Apartments to the west. Existing Chain Link Fence on West Side Signage A monument sign is currently located in the southeast corner of the property. This sign is proposed to be removed and replaced with a digital monument sign on the northeast side of the property. Digital monument signs and dynamic display signs are regulated by City Code Title 12-1-7H. Government buildings in the R-6 district are permitted to have dynamic display monument signs. The sign must be set back 10 feet from all property lines and not exceed 24 square feet. The images must be static and there is a one-hour minimum between changes in display transition. A separate building permit is required prior to installation of signage. Sign Locations Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Jennifer Levitt Park Grove Library – Site Plan Review September 17, 2025 Page 10 of 12 Photometric Plan City code standard requires 0.5 foot candles or less when measured at property lines abutting any residential parcel. The Applicant has provided a photometric plan indicating a maximum 0.5 foot candles or less at all property lines. Architectural Materials City code requires non-residential buildings within residential districts to use at least three different Class I materials and be composed of no less than 65 percent Class I and 2 materials. The existing building consists of brick and glass. The existing brick will remain towards the rear (west side) of the building and the new façade will consist of black smooth fired clay face brick, transparent glass, and architectural metal panels. Material Class Percent Belden Ebony Black Smooth Fired Clay Face Brick 1 79% Existing Fired Clay Faced Brick 1 Transparent Glass 1 Architectural Metal Panels 3 20% Steel Siding 4 1% The dark brown-black brick will contrast with the existing brick on the remainder of the building and help to break up the original monolithic façade. There will be brick detailing with corbelling patterns to add interest to the walls near the entrance. Th e architectural metal panels will be installed in three colors to create a gradient effect across the building symbolizing water and the natural environment of Cottage Grove. Areas where multiple materials come together will highlight their differences. This design is inspired by the idea of a ‘confluence,’ reflecting the confluence of the St. Croix and Mississippi Rivers. Designers were also inspired by the Glacial Valley Park Building and future Mississippi Dunes Park Building. Exterior Materials Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Jennifer Levitt Park Grove Library – Site Plan Review September 17, 2025 Page 11 of 12 Elevations Grading and Surface Water Management The Applicant is proposing grading around the existing building and the addition of storm infra - structure to manage stormwater on-site. The current plan shows pervious pavers with under- ground stone for filtration “PaveDrain,” catch basins, storm drains, and storm sewer pipe. One direct outlet area of discharge is proposed by connecting to the private storm sewer on the Grove 80 site. This pipe has already been extended onto the library property and is currently in use. The proposed grading and associated drainage are proposed to meet the surface water management requirements established by the State, Watershed District, and the City’s Surface Water Manage - ment Plan. An NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit and Stormwater Management Agreement will need to be executed for all stormwater infrastructure installed with the site. Impervious Surface Coverage Maximum impervious surface coverage in the R-6 District is 65 percent of the total lot area. There is currently 49.2 percent impervious surface coverage. After construction, there will be approxi - mately 48 percent impervious surface coverage. The eastern area of the parking lot will consist of pervious pavers. Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Jennifer Levitt Park Grove Library – Site Plan Review September 17, 2025 Page 12 of 12 Grading Plan Public Hearing Notices The public hearing notice for the August 25, 2025, Planning Commission meeting was published in the Saint Paul Pioneer Press and mailed to 85 property owners within 500 feet of the proposed project on August 12, 2025. Staff has not received any comments at the time of writing the report. Planning Commission Meeting The City’s Planning Commission reviewed and held a public hearing for the request at their August 25, 2025, meeting. No one from the public spoke at the public hearing . The Commission unani- mously (4-to-0 vote) recommended approval of the application. Recommendation The City Council is recommended to take the following actions: 1. Adopt Resolution 2025-144 approving a Site Plan Review for a building addition, façade remodel, and exterior site improvements at Park Grove Library. 2. Adopt the Development Agreement with Washington County, subject to minor modifications as approved by the City Attorney. CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2025-144 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR A BUILDING ADDITION, FAÇADE REMODEL, AND EXTERIOR SITE IMPROVEMENTS AT PARK GROVE LIBRARY LOCATED AT 7900 HEMINGWAY AVENUE SOUTH WHEREAS, Alliiance (Applicant), on behalf of Washington County (Property Owner), applied for a site plan review for a building addition, façade remodel, and exterior site improvements for the property legally described below: THAT PART OF THE NORTH 260.15 FEET OF THE SOUTH 590.15 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 21 WEST, CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA, WHICH LIES WESTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER DISTANCE 2216.00 FEET WEST FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE NORTHERLY PERPENDICULAR TO SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER AND THERE TERMINATING. Commonly known as 7900 Hemingway Avenue South, Cottage Grove, Washington County, State of Minnesota WHEREAS, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within 500 feet of the property and a public hearing notice was published in the St. Paul Pioneer Press; and WHEREAS, a planning staff report, which detailed specific information on the property and the application request, was prepared and presented; and WHEREAS, the public hearing was open for public testimony. No public testimony was received. The applicant attended the public hearing and answered questions from the Plan ning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission unanimously (4-to-0 vote) recommended that the City Council approve the site plan review for a building addition, façade remodel, and exterior site improvements at 7900 Hemingway Avenue South at their August 25, 2025, meeting. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Cottage Grove, Washington County, Minnesota, hereby approves the site plan review for the construction of a building addition, façade remodel, and exterior site improvements at Park Grove Library located at 7900 Hemingway Avenue South, subject to the conditions below: General Development 1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to the plans, as determined City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota City Council Resolution 2025-144 Page 2 of 4 by planning staff, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 2. All applicable permits (i.e., building, demolition, electrical, grading, right-of-way, and mechanical) and a commercial plan review packet must be completed, submitted, and approved by the City prior to the commencement of any construction activities. Detailed construction plans must be reviewed and approved by the Building Official, City Engineer, and Fire Marshal. All applicable fees and letters of credit shall be received by the City prior to issuance of any permits. 3. Site Plan Review approval shall expire one year from the date of City Council ap - proval unless a building permit has been requested or a time extension has been granted by the City Council. The City Council may extend the expiration date of such approval upon written application by the entity to whom the approval was granted. 4. A Stormwater Management Agreement must be executed prior to issuance of a building permit with the City for all stormwater infrastructure installed within the site. Landscaping 5. Installation of landscaping shall occur in a timely fashion and be consistent with an approved plan. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a letter of credit in the amount of 150 percent of the landscape estimate shall be submitted to the City as required by City ordinance. The financial guarantee shall be held until all required plantings are installed. At such time of installation, the Planning Department shall conduct an inspection to verify compliance with the landscape plan. If the inspection is approved, 50 percent of the financial guarantee shall be released. One year from the date of initial inspection, a follow-up inspection shall be conducted to verify sur- vivability. If the follow-up inspection is approved, the remainder of the financial guar- antee shall be released. 6. Irrigation shall be provided for all landscaped areas. The irrigation system shall con - sist of an underground sprinkling system that is designed by a professional irrigation installer to meet the water requirements of the site’s specific vegetation. The system shall be detailed on the final landscape plan. Construction and Grading 7. The grading and erosion control plan for the site must comply with MPCA’s SWWPP and NPDES Permit requirements. Erosion control devices must be installed prior to commencement of any grading activity. Erosion control must be performed in ac - cordance with the recommended practices of the “Minnesota Construction Site Ero - sion and Sediment Control Planning Handbook” and the conditions stipulated in Title 9-7-1, Erosion Control During Construction, of the City’s Subdivision Ordinance. The Applicant shall be responsible for the costs for the City to inspect the site in relation to erosion control conformance. 8. The Applicant must provide the City with an as-built survey of all utilities and grading plan. City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota City Council Resolution 2025-144 Page 3 of 4 9. The Applicant is responsible for removing debris from all adjacent public and private roadways during their grading and construction process. The adjacent streets shall be swept clean daily or as needed. 10. Applicant will be required to conduct all major activities to construct the improve- ments during the following hours of operation: Monday through Friday 7:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M. Saturday 9:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M. Sunday Not Allowed Any deviations from the above hours are subject to approval of the City. 11. The Applicant shall within 24 hours, or more often if required by the City Engineer, clear from the public streets and property any soil, earth, or debris resulting from construction work by the Applicant or its agents or assigns. All debris, including brush, vegetation, trees, and demolition materials, shall be properly disposed of off - site; burying construction debris, trees, and other vegetation is prohibited. Burning of trees and structures is prohibited, except for fire training only. Performance Standards 12. Rubbish, waste, and recycling containers shall be stored within an appropriately sized enclosed structure compliant with City ordinance screening requirements and shall always be maintained so as not cause odors or other public nuisances. 13. Signage is not approved as part of this application. Any proposed signage shall meet the requirements of the sign ordinance and require a separate building permit. 14. The developer shall enter into a sidewalk and stairway encroachment agreement with the City for sidewalk and stair connections within the Hemingway Avenue right- of-way prior to the issuance of a building permit. 15. The developer shall enter into a Development Agreement with the City prior to the issuance of any permits. 17. The Applicant grants the City, its agents, employees, officers, and contractors per - mission to enter the site to perform all necessary inspections during grading and construction activities. 18. Dust control measures must be in place to prevent dust and erosion, including, but not limited to daily watering, silt fences, and seeding. The City Engineer may impose reasonable measures to reduce dust at the site. Passed this 17th day of September 2025. Myron Bailey, Mayor City of Cottage Grove, Minnesota City Council Resolution 2025-144 Page 4 of 4 Attest: Tamara Anderson, City Clerk DA T E CO M M I S S I O N N O . PR O J E C T CL I E N T Pa r k G r o v e L i b r a r y Wa s h i n g t o n C o u n t y PLANNING SU B M I S S I O N 20 2 5 . 0 7 . 30 20 2 5 0 2 9 79 0 0 H e m i n g w a y A v e S , C o t t a g e G r o v e , M N 5 5 0 1 6 A 2 3 4 5 6 B C D E 1 PROJECT CLIENT ARCHITECT Alliiance 400 Clifton Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55403 612.874.4100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER Meyer Borgman Johnson 801 Nicollet Mall Suite W2000 Minneapoils, MN 55402 612.338.0713 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING ENGINEERS Emanuelson-Podas, Inc. 7705 Bush Lake Rd Edina, MN 55439 952.930.0050 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Aune Fernandez Landscape Architects 755 Prior Ave N #104 St. Paul, MN 55104 661.341.3611 CIVIL ENGINEER Kimley-Horn 767 N Eustis St #100 St. Paul, MN 55114 651.645.4197 ISSUED FOR DATE Copyright Alliiance PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION COMMISSION NO Washington County Park Grove Library DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 07/25/2025 PLANNING SUBMISSION 07/30/2025 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1.THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE LATEST EDITION OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF THE LOCAL JURISDICTION AND STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE CONTENTS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM AS APPLICABLE TO THESE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 3.PERFORM ALL WORK IN COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY REGULATIONS, STATE CODES, AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FURNISHING THE NECESSARY MATERIALS & LABOR TO CONSTRUCT THE FACILITY AS SHOWN AND DESCRIBED IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE APPROPRIATE APPROVING AUTHORITIES. 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR AND GRUB ALL AREAS UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, REMOVING TREES, STUMPS, ROOTS, MUCK, EXISTING PAVEMENT AND ALL OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIAL. 5.THE EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS QUALITY LEVEL "D" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ACSE 38/02, ENTITLED STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF SUBSURFACE QUALITY DATA BY THE FHA. EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE LOCATED ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO THE ENGINEER AT THE TIME OF THE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER. GUARANTEE IS NOT MADE THAT ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN OR THAT THE LOCATION OF THOSE SHOWN ARE ENTIRELY ACCURATE. FINDING THE ACTUAL LOCATION OF ANY EXISTING UTILITIES IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY AND SHALL BE DONE BEFORE COMMENCING ANY WORK IN THE VICINITY. FURTHERMORE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES DUE TO THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. THE OWNER OR ENGINEER WILL ASSUME NO LIABILITY FOR ANY DAMAGES SUSTAINED OR COST INCURRED BECAUSE OF THE OPERATIONS IN THE VICINITY OF EXISTING UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES, NOR FOR TEMPORARY BRACING AND SHORING OF SAME. IF IT IS NECESSARY TO SHORE, BRACE, SWING OR RELOCATE A UTILITY, THE UTILITY COMPANY OR DEPARTMENT AFFECTED SHALL BE CONTACTED AND THEIR PERMISSION OBTAINED REGARDING THE METHOD TO USE FOR SUCH WORK. 6.IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES WHICH MAY HAVE BURIED OR AERIAL UTILITIES WITHIN OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION AREA BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE 48 HOURS MINIMUM NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. 7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND BONDS IF REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE AVAILABLE AT THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES ONE COPY OF THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS INCLUDING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND COPIES OF ANY REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS. 9.ANY DISCREPANCIES ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER AND ENGINEER BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. NO FIELD CHANGES OR DEVIATIONS FROM DESIGN ARE TO BE MADE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE OWNER AND NOTIFICATION TO THE ENGINEER. 10.ALL COPIES OF COMPACTION, CONCRETE AND OTHER REQUIRED TEST RESULTS ARE TO BE SENT TO THE OWNER DIRECTLY FROM THE TESTING AGENCY. 11.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DOCUMENTING AND MAINTAINING AS-BUILT INFORMATION WHICH SHALL BE RECORDED AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES OR AT THE COMPLETION OF APPROPRIATE CONSTRUCTION INTERVALS AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AS-BUILT DRAWINGS TO THE OWNER FOR THE PURPOSE OF CERTIFICATION TO JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES AS REQUIRED. ALL AS-BUILT DATA SHALL BE COLLECTED BY A STATE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR WHOSE SERVICES ARE ENGAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 12.ANY WELLS DISCOVERED ON SITE THAT WILL HAVE NO USE MUST BE PLUGGED BY A LICENSED WELL DRILLING CONTRACTOR IN A MANNER APPROVED BY ALL JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY WELL ABANDONMENT PERMITS REQUIRED. 13.ANY WELL DISCOVERED DURING EARTH MOVING OR EXCAVATION SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE APPROPRIATE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER DISCOVERY IS MADE. 14.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THAT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS DO NOT CONFLICT WITH ANY KNOWN EXISTING OR OTHER PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. IF ANY CONFLICTS ARE DISCOVERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PORTION OF THE SITE WORK THAT WOULD BE AFFECTED. FAILURE TO NOTIFY OWNER OF AN IDENTIFIABLE CONFLICT PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH INSTALLATION RELIEVES OWNER OF ANY OBLIGATION TO PAY FOR A RELATED CHANGE ORDER. 15.SHOULD CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTER ANY DEBRIS LADEN SOIL, STRUCTURES NOT IDENTIFIED IN THE DOCUMENTS, OR OTHER SOURCE OF POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION, THEY SHALL IMMEDIATELY CONTACT THE ENGINEER AND OWNER. 16.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY OWNER AND/OR ENGINEER 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES: PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING, SUBGRADE PREPARATION, BASE INSTALLATION, ASPHALT INSTALLATION, UNDERGROUND PIPING AND UTILITIES INSTALLATION,INSTALLATION OF STRUCTURES, CHECK VALVES, HYDRANTS, METERS, ETC., SIDEWALK INSTALLATION, CONNECTIONS TO WATER AND SEWER MAINS, TESTS OF UTILITIES. EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1.THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ("SWPPP") IS COMPRISED OF THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN, THE STANDARD DETAILS, THE PLAN NARRATIVE, ATTACHMENTS INCLUDED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE SWPPP, PLUS THE PERMIT AND ALL SUBSEQUENT REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS. 2.ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN AND THE STATE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM GENERAL PERMIT (NPDES PERMIT) AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THEIR CONTENTS. 3.BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) AND CONTROLS SHALL CONFORM TO FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL REQUIREMENTS OR MANUAL OF PRACTICE, AS APPLICABLE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT ADDITIONAL CONTROLS AS DIRECTED BY THE PERMITTING AGENCY OR OWNER. 4.THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION, AND SHALL MAINTAIN COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. 5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUST AND/OR PROVIDE ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL BMP'S AS NEEDED TO PREVENT EROSION AND OFF-SITE SEDIMENT DISCHARGE FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. LOG AND RECORD ANY ADJUSTMENTS AND DEVIATIONS FROM THE APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLANS WITHIN THE SWPPP DOCUMENTS STORED IN THE JOB SITE TRAILER. 6.BMPS SHOWN ON THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN, AND IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN, SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN FULLY FUNCTIONAL CONDITION AS REQUIRED BY ALL JURISDICTIONS UNTIL NO LONGER REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETED PHASE OF WORK OR FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CHECKED BY A CERTIFIED PERSON AT LEAST ONCE EVERY 7 CALENDAR DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THE END OF A 0.5-INCH OR GREATER RAINFALL EVENT. 7.EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: 7.1.INLET PROTECTION DEVICES AND BARRIERS SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED IF THEY SHOW SIGNS OF UNDERMINING OR DETERIORATION. 7.2.ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE CHECKED REGULARLY TO VERIFY THAT A HEALTHY STAND OF VEGETATION IS MAINTAINED. SEEDED AREAS SHOULD BE FERTILIZED, WATERED AND RE-SEEDED AS NEEDED. REFER TO THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 7.3.SILT FENCES SHALL BE REPAIRED TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITIONS IF DAMAGED. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SILT FENCES WHEN IT REACHES ONE-THIRD THE HEIGHT OF THE SILT FENCE. 7.4.THE ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE(S) SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOW OF MUD ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC ADDITIONS OF ROCK TOP DRESSING AS CONDITIONS DEMAND. 7.5.THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA SHALL BE KEPT IN GOOD CONDITION (SUITABLE FOR PARKING AND STORAGE). THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC ADDITIONS OF TOP DRESSING IF THE TEMPORARY PARKING CONDITIONS DEMAND. 7.6.PERFORM ALL MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS IN A TIMELY MANNER BUT IN NO CASE LATER THAN 2 CALENDAR DAYS FOLLOWING THE INSPECTION. PAVING AND STRIPING NOTES 1.ALL PAVING, CONSTRUCTION, MATERIALS, AND WORKMANSHIP WITHIN JURISDICTION'S RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE LOCAL CITY OR COUNTY SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS, OR THE STATE DOT SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS IF NOT COVERED BY LOCAL CITY OR COUNTY REGULATIONS. 2.ALL SIGNS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (M.U.T.C.D) AND CITY STANDARDS. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS FOR FIRE LANES, ROADWAY LANES, PARKING STALLS, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMBOLS, ACCESS AISLES, STOP BARS AND SIGNS, AND MISCELLANEOUS STRIPING WITHIN THE PARKING LOT AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 4.ALL EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL EXTEND THROUGH THE CURB. 5.THE MINIMUM LENGTH OF OFFSET JOINTS AT RADIUS POINTS SHALL BE 2 FEET. 6.ALL JOINTS, INCLUDING EXPANSION JOINTS WITH REMOVABLE TACK STRIPS, SHALL BE SEALED WITH JOINT SEALANT. 7.THE MATERIALS AND PROPERTIES OF ALL CONCRETE SHALL MEET THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS IN THE A.C.I. (AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE) MANUAL OF CONCRETE PRACTICE. 8.CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY A SECOND COATING OVER ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY OWNER FOLLOWED BY A COAT OF GLASS BEADS AS APPLICABLE PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 9.ANY EXISTING PAVEMENT, CURBS AND/OR SIDEWALKS DAMAGED OR REMOVED WILL BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS EXPENSE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER AND OWNER. 10.BEFORE PLACING PAVEMENT, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY SUITABLE ACCESSIBLE ROUTES (PER A.D.A). GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE ISSUES. 11.MAXIMUM JOINT SPACING IS TWICE THE DEPTH OF THE CONCRETE PAVEMENT IN FEET. GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES 1.GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL VERIFY THE SUITABILITY OF ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS INCLUDING GRADES AND DIMENSIONS BEFORE START OF CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GRADE THE SITE TO THE ELEVATIONS INDICATED AND SHALL ADJUST BMP'S AS NECESSARY AND REGRADE WASHOUTS WHERE THEY OCCUR AFTER EVERY RAINFALL UNTIL A GRASS STAND IS WELL ESTABLISHED OR ADEQUATE STABILIZATION OCCURS. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THERE IS POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS SO THAT SURFACE RUNOFF WILL DRAIN BY GRAVITY TO NEW OR EXISTING DRAINAGE OUTLETS. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE NO PONDING OCCURS IN PAVED AREAS AND SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IF ANY GRADING DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND IN THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADES PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF PAVEMENT OR UTILITIES. 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL MANHOLE COVERS, VALVE COVERS, VAULT LIDS, FIRE HYDRANTS, POWER POLES, GUY WIRES, AND TELEPHONE BOXES THAT ARE TO REMAIN IN PLACE AND UNDISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING CASTINGS AND STRUCTURES TO REMAIN SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO MATCH THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADES. 5.BACKFILL FOR UTILITY LINES SHALL BE PLACED PER DETAILS, STANDARDS, AND SPECIFICATIONS SO THAT THE UTILITY WILL BE STABLE. WHERE UTILITY LINES CROSS THE PARKING LOT, THE TOP 6 INCHES SHALL BE COMPACTED SIMILARLY TO THE REMAINDER OF THE LOT. UTILITY DITCHES SHALL BE VISUALLY INSPECTED DURING THE EXCAVATION PROCESS TO ENSURE THAT UNDESIRABLE FILL IS NOT USED. 6.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF 4" OF TOPSOIL AT COMPLETION OF WORK. ALL UNPAVED AREAS IN EXISTING RIGHTS-OF-WAY DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REGRADED AND SODDED. 7.AFTER PLACEMENT OF SUBGRADE AND PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF PAVEMENT, CONTRACTOR SHALL TEST AND OBSERVE PAVEMENT AREAS FOR EVIDENCE OF PONDING. ALL AREAS SHALL ADEQUATELY DRAIN TOWARDS THE INTENDED STRUCTURE TO CONVEY STORM RUNOFF. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY OWNER AND ENGINEER IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE DISCOVERED. 8.WHERE EXISTING PAVEMENT IS INDICATED TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SAW CUT FULL DEPTH FOR A SMOOTH AND STRAIGHT JOINT AND REPLACE THE PAVEMENT WITH THE SAME TYPE AND DEPTH OF MATERIAL AS EXISTING OR AS INDICATED. 9.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL PROTECTION OVER ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION AND UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT BY THE OWNER. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES SHALL BE CLEANED OF DEBRIS AS REQUIRED DURING AND AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE FLOWS. 10.IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ANY APPLICABLE REQUIRED PERMITS. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE WITH THE OWNER AND THE DESIGN ENGINEER PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. 11.FIELD DENSITY TESTS SHALL BE TAKEN AT INTERVALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY OR TO STATE DOT STANDARDS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. 12.ALL SLOPES AND AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE GRADED AS PER PLANS. THE AREAS SHALL THEN BE SODDED OR SEEDED AS SPECIFIED IN THE PLANS, FERTILIZED, MULCHED, WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL GROWTH IS ESTABLISHED TO MINIMUM COVERAGE OF 70% IN ALL AREAS. ANY AREAS DISTURBED FOR ANY REASON PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE JOB SHALL BE CORRECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. ALL EARTHEN AREAS WILL BE SODDED OR SEEDED AND MULCHED AS SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPING PLAN. 13.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTROL OF DUST AND DIRT RISING AND SCATTERING IN THE AIR DURING CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL PROVIDE WATER SPRINKLING OR OTHER SUITABLE METHODS OF CONTROL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL GOVERNING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. 14.SOD, WHERE CALLED FOR, MUST BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED ON EXPOSED SLOPES WITHIN 48 HOURS OF COMPLETING FINAL GRADING, AND AT ANY OTHER TIME AS NECESSARY, TO PREVENT EROSION, SEDIMENTATION OR TURBID DISCHARGES. 15.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT LANDSCAPE ISLAND PLANTING AREAS AND OTHER PLANTING AREAS ARE NOT COMPACTED AND DO NOT CONTAIN ROAD BASE MATERIALS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO EXCAVATE AND REMOVE ALL UNDESIRABLE MATERIAL FROM ALL AREAS ON THE SITE TO BE PLANTED AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF IN A LEGAL MANNER. 16.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL UNDERGROUND STORM WATER PIPING PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND STATE DOT SPECIFICATIONS. 17.PAVEMENTS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE SITE SPECIFIC GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT AND CITY & STATE DOT SPECIFICATIONS. 18.SPOT ELEVATIONS REPRESENT THE FINISHED SURFACE GRADE OR FLOWLINE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 19.LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION ARE TO THE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON THE PLAN. 20.IMMEDIATELY REPORT TO THE OWNER ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND BETWEEN ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. 21.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND PROTECTING EXISTING UTILITIES, AND SHALL REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO EXISTING UTILITIES THAT OCCUR DURING CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT COMPENSATION. 22.BLEND NEW EARTHWORK SMOOTHLY TO TRANSITION BACK TO EXISTING GRADE. 23.ALL PROPOSED GRADES ONSITE SHALL BE 3:1 OR FLATTER UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THE PLANS. ANY SLOPES STEEPER THAN 4:1 REQUIRE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BLANKET. 24.ADHERE TO ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS NECESSARY IN THE GENERAL N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT AND STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGE ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 25.ADJUST AND/OR CUT EXISTING PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY TO ASSURE A SMOOTH FIT AND CONTINUOUS GRADE. WATER STORM SEWER & SANITARY SEWER NOTES 1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT GRAVITY SEWER LATERALS, MANHOLES, GRAVITY SEWER LINES, AND DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL NECESSARY MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, MACHINERY, TOOLS, MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION AND LABOR NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK IN FULL AND COMPLETE ACCORDANCE WITH THE SHOWN, DESCRIBED AND REASONABLY INTENDED REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. 2.ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR UTILITY LOCATION AND COORDINATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NOTES CONTAINED IN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SECTION OF THIS SHEET. 3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL DISTURBED VEGETATION IN KIND, UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. 4.DEFLECTION OF PIPE JOINTS AND CURVATURE OF PIPE SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. SECURELY CLOSE ALL OPEN ENDS OF PIPE AND FITTINGS WITH A WATERTIGHT PLUG WHEN WORK IS NOT IN PROGRESS. THE INTERIOR OF ALL PIPES SHALL BE CLEAN AND JOINT SURFACES WIPED CLEAN AND DRY AFTER THE PIPE HAS BEEN LOWERED INTO THE TRENCH. VALVES SHALL BE PLUMB AND LOCATED ACCORDING TO THE PLANS. 5.ALL PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE CAREFULLY STORED FOLLOWING MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THE COATING OR LINING IN ANY D.I. PIPE FITTINGS. ANY PIPE OR FITTING WHICH IS DAMAGED OR WHICH HAS FLAWS OR IMPERFECTIONS WHICH, IN THE OPINION OF THE ENGINEER OR OWNER, RENDERS IT UNFIT FOR USE, SHALL NOT BE USED. ANY PIPE NOT SATISFACTORY FOR USE SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED AND IMMEDIATELY REMOVED FROM THE JOB SITE, AND SHALL BE REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 6.WATER FOR FIRE FIGHTING SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO COMBUSTIBLES BEING BROUGHT ON SITE. 7.ALL UTILITY AND STORM DRAIN TRENCHES LOCATED UNDER AREAS TO RECEIVE PAVING SHALL BE COMPLETELY BACK FILLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GOVERNING JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY'S SPECIFICATIONS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. 8.UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES SHALL BE SURVEYED BY A STATE LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR PRIOR TO BACK FILLING. 9.CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM, AT THEIR OWN EXPENSE, ANY AND ALL TESTS REQUIRED BY THE SPECIFICATIONS AND/OR ANY AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION. THESE TESTS MAY INCLUDE, BUT MAY NOT BE LIMITED TO, INFILTRATION AND EXFILTRATION, TELEVISION INSPECTION AND A MANDREL TEST ON GRAVITY SEWER. A COPY OF THE TEST RESULTS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE UTILITY PROVIDER, OWNER AND JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY AS REQUIRED. 10.BETWEEN WATER AND SEWER MANHOLES AND PIPES, CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FOR A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE OF 10-FEET AND A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18-INCHES. 11.IF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES TO REMAIN ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AS NECESSARY TO RETURN IT TO EXISTING CONDITIONS OR BETTER. 12.ALL STORM PIPE ENTERING STRUCTURES SHALL BE GASKETED AND/OR GROUTED TO ASSURE CONNECTION AT STRUCTURE IS WATERTIGHT UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED BY CITY AND STATE DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 13.UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED IN CITY AND STATE DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS, ALL STORM SEWER MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE FLUSH WITH PAVEMENT, AND SHALL HAVE TRAFFIC BEARING RING & COVERS. MANHOLES IN UNPAVED AREAS SHALL BE 6" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. LIDS SHALL BE LABELED "STORM SEWER". EXISTING CASTINGS AND STRUCTURES WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO MEET THESE CONDITIONS AND THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE. 14.TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION IS TAKEN FROM A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY LAND SURVEYORS. IF THE CONTRACTOR DOES NOT ACCEPT EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, WITHOUT EXCEPTION, THEN THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY, AT THEIR EXPENSE, A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR TO THE OWNER FOR REVIEW. 15.CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO SAME. 16.ALL STORM STRUCTURES SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH UNIFORM POURED MORTAR FROM INVERT IN TO INVERT OUT. 17.ROOF DRAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO STORM SEWER BY PREFABRICATED WYES OR AT STORM STRUCTURES. ROOF DRAINS AND TRUCK WELL DRAIN SHALL RUN AT A MINIMUM 2.0% SLOPE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, AND TIE IN AT THE CENTERLINE OF THE STORM MAIN. 18.PROVIDE INSULATION OF UNDERGROUND ROOF DRAINS AND SANITARY SEWER SERVICES IF ADEQUATE FROST DEPTH CANNOT BE PROVIDED. 19.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND APPURTENANCES THAT ARE TO REMAIN FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. 20.THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND OTHER ABOVE AND BELOW-GRADE IMPROVEMENTS ARE APPROXIMATE AS SHOWN. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION, SIZE AND INVERT ELEVATIONS OF EACH PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 21.A MINIMUM SEPARATION OF 5-FEET IS REQUIRED BETWEEN UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND TREES UNLESS A ROOT BARRIER IS UTILIZED. 22.GAS, PHONE AND ELECTRIC SERVICES SHOWN FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. DRY UTILITY COMPANIES MAY ALTER THE DESIGN LAYOUT DURING THEIR REVIEW. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE FINAL DESIGN AND INSTALLATION WITH UTILITY COMPANIES. 23.COORDINATE UTILITY INSTALLATION WITH IRRIGATION DESIGN AND INSTALLATION. 24.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FLOW LINE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PERIMETER WALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO INSIDE WALL FACE. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT WALL WIDTH AND SPECIFICATIONS. 25.REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS, MATERIALS SPECIFICATIONS. 26.REFERENCE M.E.P. PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT DIMENSIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 27.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE STRUCTURAL PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR FOOTING AND FOUNDATION PAD PREPARATION SPECIFICATIONS. 28.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE M.E.P PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR ROUTING OF PROPOSED ELECTRICAL & COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES AND SITE LIGHTING LAYOUT. THIRD PARTY SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OR OMISSIONS CONTAINED WITHIN SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THIRD PARTY CONSULTANTS. 1.BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PERFORMED BY: EGAN, FIELD & NOWAK, INC. ADDRESS: 475 OLD HIGHWAY 8 NW, SUITE 200, NEW BRIGHTON, MN 55112 PHONE: 612-466-3300 DATED: 04/21/2025 2.GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT PERFORMED BY: BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION ADDRESS: 11001 HAMPSHIRE AVE S, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55438 PHONE: 952-995-2000 DATED: 05/30/2025 3.CONSTRUCTION TESTING TEST REPORTS REQUIRED FOR CLOSE OUT INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO: ·DENSITY TEST REPORTS ·BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS OF WATER SYSTEM ·PRESSURE TEST OF WATER/SEWER ·LEAK TESTS ON SEWER SYSTEM AND GREASE TRAPS ·ANY OTHER TESTING REQUIRED BY THE AGENCY/MUNICIPALITY GE N E R A L NO T E S C1 0 0 86 5 86 6 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 87 6 87 7 87 8 87 9 88 0 88 1 876877878879880 876 877 87 8 878 878 879 87 9 879 880 881 882883 87 4 87 5 87 6 87 7 HE M I N G W A Y A V E N U E S O U T H TYP. TYP. TYP. TYP. PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT PROTECT EXISTING STORM SEWER AND CATCH BASIN A B B B B B B B B B B C F F F F F G J J H H H H I I K D L LM M N N N NN N O O O O O O O O O O O N N Q Q Q Q P P E E E E R R F C C C B S PROPERTY SUMMARY TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 2.50 AC / 108,904 SF DISTURBED AREA 1.85 AC / 80,589 SF EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 1.23 AC / 53,570 SF / 49.2% EXISTING PERVIOUS AREA 1.27 AC / 55,334 SF / 50.8% PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 1.20 AC / 52,432 SF / 48% PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 1.30 AC / 56,472 SF / 52% NET INCREASE IN IMPERVIOUS AREA 0.0 AC / 0 SF A 2 3 4 5 6 B C D E 1 PROJECT CLIENT ARCHITECT Alliiance 400 Clifton Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55403 612.874.4100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER Meyer Borgman Johnson 801 Nicollet Mall Suite W2000 Minneapoils, MN 55402 612.338.0713 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING ENGINEERS Emanuelson-Podas, Inc. 7705 Bush Lake Rd Edina, MN 55439 952.930.0050 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Aune Fernandez Landscape Architects 755 Prior Ave N #104 St. Paul, MN 55104 661.341.3611 CIVIL ENGINEER Kimley-Horn 767 N Eustis St #100 St. Paul, MN 55114 651.645.4197 ISSUED FOR DATE Copyright Alliiance PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION COMMISSION NO Washington County Park Grove Library DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 07/25/2025 PLANNING SUBMISSION 07/30/2025 LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION REMOVE BITUMINOUS SURFACE REMOVE CONCRETE SURFACE REMOVE BUILDING REMOVE TREE REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER REMOVE UTILITY LINES PROPERTY LINE EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING GAS MAIN EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING SIGN EXISTING STORM MANHOLE EXISTING STORM CATCHBASIN EXISTING HYDRANT EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING TREE CLEARING & GRUBBING FILL & ABANDON UTILITY LINES EXISTING CURB & GUTTER LEGEND FULL DEPTH SAWCUT 1.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEMOLITION, REMOVAL, AND DISPOSAL (IN A LOCATION APPROVED BY ALL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES) OF ALL STRUCTURES, PADS, WALLS, FLUMES, FOUNDATIONS, PARKING, DRIVES, DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, ETC. SUCH THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE PLANS CAN BE CONSTRUCTED. FACILITIES TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE UNDERCUT TO SUITABLE MATERIAL AND BROUGHT TO GRADE WITH SUITABLE COMPACTED FILL MATERIAL PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 2.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ALL DEBRIS FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSING OF THE DEBRIS IN A LAWFUL MANNER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL AND STATE REGULATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ANY REQUIRED PERMITS FOR DEMOLITION AND DISPOSAL FROM THE APPROPRIATE LOCAL AND STATE AGENCIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE COPIES OF THE PERMIT AND RECEIPTS OF DISPOSAL OF MATERIALS TO THE OWNER AND OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE, INCLUDING THE TYPE OF DEBRIS AND LOCATION WHERE IT WAS DISPOSED. 3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN UTILITY SERVICES TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES AT ALL TIMES. UTILITY SERVICES SHALL NOT BE INTERRUPTED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AND COORDINATION WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND/OR THE CITY. 4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL AND/OR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY CONCERNING PORTIONS OF WORK WHICH MAY BE PERFORMED BY THE UTILITY COMPANY'S FORCES AND ANY FEES WHICH ARE TO BE PAID TO THE UTILITY COMPANY FOR THEIR SERVICES. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING ALL FEES AND CHARGES. 5.THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLAN HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM THE BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE AND ARE GIVEN FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR. THE ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR ACCURACY. PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY DEMOLITION ACTIVITY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANIES TO PROVIDE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN PROPOSED WORK AREA. 6.EXISTING SEWERS, PIPING AND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE BASED ON AVAILABLE RECORD PLAN DATA AND/OR FIELD UTILITY MARKINGS AND ARE NOT TO BE INTERPRETED AS THE EXACT LOCATION. ADDITIONAL UNMARKED OBSTACLES MAY EXIST ON THE SITE. VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROCEED WITH CAUTION AROUND ANY ANTICIPATED UNDERGROUND FEATURES. GIVE NOTICE TO AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANIES REGARDING REMOVAL OF SERVICE LINES AND CAP ANY ABANDONED LINES BEFORE PRECEDING WITH THE PROPOSED WORK. 7.ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE, CABLE, WATER, FIBER OPTIC, AND/OR GAS LINES NEEDING TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANY. ADEQUATE TIME SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR RELOCATION AND CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY IS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION IN UTILITY SERVICE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN ANY ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY DURING CONSTRUCTION. 8.CONTRACTOR MUST PROTECT THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES WITH FENCING, BARRICADES, ENCLOSURES, ETC. (AND OTHER APPROPRIATE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES) AS APPROVED BY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE COORDINATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY, COUNTY, AND STATE DOT AS NECESSARY. 9.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS IF ACCESS WILL BE INTERRUPTED OR ALTERED AT ANY TIME DURING CONSTRUCTION. 10.PRIOR TO THE START OF DEMOLITION, INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BMP'S IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANS / SWPPP. 11.CONTRACTOR MAY LIMIT SAW-CUT AND PAVEMENT REMOVAL TO ONLY THOSE AREAS WHERE IT IS REQUIRED AS SHOWN ON THESE CONSTRUCTION PLANS BUT IF ANY DAMAGE IS INCURRED ON ANY OF THE SURROUNDING PAVEMENT OR CURB, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS REMOVAL AND REPAIR. 12.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WATER MAIN WORK WITH THE CITY WATER AND FIRE DEPARTMENTS TO ENSURE ADEQUATE FIRE PROTECTION IS CONSTANTLY AVAILABLE TO THE SITE AND SURROUNDING PROPERTIES THROUGH ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ARRANGING/PROVIDING ANY REQUIRED WATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WITH THE CITY. ANY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH WATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND NO EXTRA COMPENSATION WILL BE PROVIDED. 13.IN THE EVENT A WELL IS FOUND, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER AND OWNER IMMEDIATELY. ALL WELLS SHALL BE SEALED BY A LICENSED WELL CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE REQUIREMENTS. 14.IN THE EVENT THAT UNKNOWN CONTAINERS OR TANKS ARE ENCOUNTERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE OWNER AND/OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE IMMEDIATELY. ALL CONTAINERS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF AT A PERMITTED LANDFILL PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 15.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IF ANY EXISTING DRAINTILE IS ENCOUNTERED ON SITE; ACTIVE DRAINTILE SHALL NOT BE REMOVED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER. 16.IF CONTAMINATED MATERIAL IS ENCOUNTERED ON THE PROJECT SITE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STOP WORK AND NOTIFY THE OWNER AND ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY. DEMOLITION PLAN NOTES KEYNOTE LEGEND SAWCUT EXISTING PAVEMENT REMOVE EXISTING CURB REMOVE EXISTING SIDEWALK REMOVE EXISTING FURNITURE REMOVE PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVE EXISTING TREE REMOVE AND SALVAGE EXISTING SIGN REMOVE LIGHT POLE REMOVE EXISTING ELECTRICAL LINE / EQUIPMENT PROTECT EXISTING SIGN REMOVE EXISTING BIKE RACK REMOVE EXISTING SEWER LINE / STRUCTURE REMOVE EXISTING WATER LINE / HYDRANT / VALVE PROTECT EXISTING POWER / COMMUNICATIONS PROTECT EXISTING TREE PROTECT EXISTING BUILDING / STRUCTURE REMOVE EXISTING BUILDING / STRUCTURE REMOVE EXISTING NATURAL GAS LINE REMOVE EXISTING SIGN A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S Know what's below. before you dig.Call R NORTH INLET PROTECTION SILT FENCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE PHASE I BMP QUANTITIES SILT FENCE ±1,240 LF INLET PROTECTION 1 EA BIO ROLL 70 LF 1.INSTALL PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL (I.E. SILT FENCE) AND INLET PROTECTION AT EXISTING STORMWATER INLETS. 2.CONSTRUCT STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND CONCRETE WASHOUT 3.PREPARE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA. 4.CONSTRUCT AND STABILIZE DIVERSIONS AND TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS. 5.CLEAR AND GRUB THE SITE. 6.BEGIN MASS SITE GRADING AND ROUGH GRADE SITE SUFFICIENTLY TO ESTABLISH PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATTERNS. 7.START CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING PAD AND STRUCTURES. 8.TEMPORARILY SEED, THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, DISTURBED AREAS THAT WILL BE INACTIVE FOR 14 DAYS OR MORE OR AS REQUIRED BY THE NPDES AND/OR CITY GRADING PERMIT(S). NOTE: THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION IS INTENDED TO CONVEY THE GENERAL CONCEPTS OF THE EROSION CONTROL DESIGN AND SHOULD NOT BE RELIED UPON FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES. THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETAILED PHASING AND CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING IMMEDIATELY, PRIOR TO AND/OR DURING CONSTRUCTION IF ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE IS NECESSARY. PHASE 1 SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION C2 0 0 SI T E D E M O L I T I O N A N D ER O S I O N C O N T R O L P H 1 P L A N C2 0 0 1.THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ("SWPPP") IS COMPRISED OF THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN, THE STANDARD DETAILS, THE PLAN NARRATIVE, ATTACHMENTS INCLUDED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE SWPPP, PLUS THE PERMIT AND ALL SUBSEQUENT REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS. 2.ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE SWPPP AND NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) GENERAL PERMIT, AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THEIR CONTENTS. 3.BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) AND CONTROLS SHALL CONFORM TO FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS, AS APPLICABLE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT ADDITIONAL CONTROLS AS DIRECTED BY THE PERMITTING AGENCY, ENGINEER OR OWNER. 4.SITE ENTRY AND EXIT LOCATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION THAT WILL PREVENT THE TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC ROADWAYS. SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO A PUBLIC ROADWAY FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE MUST BE REMOVED AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE. WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENTRANCE ONTO A PUBLIC ROADWAY, IT SHALL BE DONE IN AN AREA STABILIZED WITH CRUSHED STONE WHICH DRAINS INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT BASIN. ANY FINES IMPOSED FOR DISCHARGING SEDIMENT ONTO A PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY SHALL BE PAID BY THE CONTRACTOR. 5.TEMPORARY SEEDING OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS OF STABILIZATION SHALL BE INITIATED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF THE LAST DISTURBANCE ON ANY AREA OF THE SITE. 6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE LAND DISTURBANCE AND CLEARING TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICAL OR AS REQUIRED BY THE GENERAL PERMIT. 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL DENOTE ON THE PLAN THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA WHICH SHALL ALSO BE USED AS THE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND CLEANING AREA, EMPLOYEE PARKING AREA, AND AREA FOR LOCATING PORTABLE FACILITIES, OFFICE TRAILERS, AND TOILET FACILITIES. 8.ALL WASH WATER FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE (CONCRETE TRUCKS, VEHICLE CLEANING, EQUIPMENT CLEANING, ETC.) SHALL BE DETAINED AND PROPERLY TREATED BEFORE DISPOSAL. 9.SUFFICIENT OIL AND GREASE ABSORBING MATERIALS AND FLOTATION BOOMS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON SITE OR READILY AVAILABLE TO CONTAIN AND CLEAN-UP FUEL OR CHEMICAL SPILLS AND LEAKS. 10.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DUST CONTROL ON SITE. THE USE OF MOTOR OILS AND OTHER PETROLEUM BASED OR TOXIC LIQUIDS FOR DUST SUPPRESSION OPERATIONS IS PROHIBITED. 11.RUBBISH, TRASH, GARBAGE, LITTER, OR OTHER SUCH MATERIALS SHALL BE DEPOSITED INTO SEALED CONTAINERS. MATERIALS SHALL BE PREVENTED FROM LEAVING THE PREMISES THROUGH THE ACTION OF WIND OR STORM WATER DISCHARGE INTO DRAINAGE DITCHES OR WATERS OF THE STATE. 12.STAGING AREAS, STOCKPILES, SPOILS, ETC. SHALL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF DRAINAGE WAYS SUCH THAT STORM WATER RUNOFF WILL NOT BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED. PROVIDE STABILIZATION MEASURES SUCH AS PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL BMP'S, SEEDING, OR OTHER COVERING AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT EROSION. 13.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RE-ESTABLISHING ANY EROSION CONTROL BMP DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. NOTIFY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE ESTABLISHED EROSION CONTROL MEASURES THAT MAY LEAD TO UNAUTHORIZED DISCHARGE OF STORM WATER POLLUTANTS. UNAUTHORIZED POLLUTANTS INCLUDE (BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO) EXCESS CONCRETE DUMPING, CONCRETE RESIDUE, PAINTS, SOLVENTS, GREASES, FUELS, LUBRICANT OILS, PESTICIDES, AND SOLID WASTE MATERIALS. 14.EROSION CONTROL BMP'S SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE START OF LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES ON THE PROJECT, AND INITIATED AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE. 15.THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION, AND SHALL MAINTAIN COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. 16.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUST AND/OR PROVIDE ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL BMP'S AS NEEDED TO PREVENT EROSION AND OFF-SITE SEDIMENT DISCHARGE FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. LOG AND RECORD ANY ADJUSTMENTS AND DEVIATIONS FROM THE APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLANS WITHIN THE SWPPP DOCUMENTS STORED IN THE JOB SITE TRAILER. EROSION CONTROL PLAN NOTES BIOROLL PROPERTY SUMMARY TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 2.50 AC / 108,904 SF DISTURBED AREA 1.85 AC / 80,589 SF EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 1.23 AC / 53,570 SF / 49.2% EXISTING PERVIOUS AREA 1.27 AC / 55,334 SF / 50.8% PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 1.20 AC / 52,432 SF / 48% PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 1.30 AC / 56,472 SF / 52% NET INCREASE IN IMPERVIOUS AREA 0.0 AC / 0 SF 86 5 866 867 868 869 870 871 87 2 87 3 87 4 87 5 87 6 87 7 87 8 879 880 877 87 8 878 878 879 87 9 87 9 87 9 87 9 880 881 882 883 87 4 87 5 87 6 87 7 86 9 87 0 87 1 87 2 873 874 875 876 876877 877 878 87 8 87987 9 88 0 88088 0 88 0 880 880 UP HE M I N G W A Y A V E N U E S O U T H EXISTING BUILDING ±21,181 SF FFE: 880.00 PROPOSED BUILDING ±20,355 SF 10 . 2 % 12 . 5 % 7.8% 20:1 27:1 71 : 1 20 . 5 % 16.4% ??? ??? 4: 1 2. 4 % 2.6 % 2.8%2.2 % 2.8% 2.9% 3.4% 3.8% 4:1 12.4 % 1.6% 5.9 % 2.6% 4.7% 7.7% 87 4 87 5 876 87 7 878 87 9 876 877 878 879 88 0 880 88 1 88 2 88 3 88 4 88 0 88 1 87787 787 887 9 87 5 87 687787 8879 87 6 87 6 87 6 87 7 87 8 87 9 880 PERFORATED NYLOPLAST 102 CB 103 CB 104 PERFORATED NYLOPLAST 101 PERFORATED NYLOPLAST 100 NYLOPLAST 106 RD A 1.TEMPORARILY SEED, THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, DENUDED AREAS THAT WILL BE INACTIVE FOR 14 DAYS OR MORE. 2.CONSTRUCT UNDERGROUND SITE UTILITIES AND STORM SEWER, INCLUDING UNDERGROUND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. 3.INSTALL APPROPRIATE INLET PROTECTION AT ANY NEW STORM SEWER STRUCTURES AS EACH STRUCTURE IS CONSTRUCTED. 4.COMPLETE SITE GRADING AND PERMANENTLY STABILIZE AREAS TO BE VEGETATED AS THEY ARE BROUGHT TO FINAL GRADE. 5.PLACE PAVEMENT BASE MATERIAL AND INSTALL SUBDRAINAGE SYSTEM. 6.CONSTRUCT PAVEMENTS, CURB & GUTTER, AND SIDEWALKS. 7.AS APPROPRIATE, REPLACE & MAINTAIN INLET PROTECTION DEVICES WITHIN PAVED AREAS AS WORK PROGRESSES. 8.COMPLETE FINAL GRADING AND INSTALL OF PERMANENT STABILIZATION (SEEDING, SODDING, ETC.) WITHIN LANDSCAPED AREAS. 9.WHEN THE SITE HAS ACHIEVED FINAL STABILIZATION AS DEFINED BY THE APPLICABLE EROSION CONTROL PERMITS, REMOVE ALL REMAINING TEMPORARY EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S AND RE-STABILIZE ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL. NOTE: THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION IS INTENDED TO CONVEY THE GENERAL CONCEPTS OF THE EROSION CONTROL DESIGN AND SHOULD NOT BE RELIED UPON FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES. THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETAILED PHASING AND CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING IMMEDIATELY, PRIOR TO AND/OR DURING CONSTRUCTION IF ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE IS NECESSARY. PHASE 2 SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION INLET PROTECTION SILT FENCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SAFETY FENCE BIOROLL LEGEND EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 1.THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ("SWPPP") IS COMPRISED OF THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN, THE STANDARD DETAILS, THE PLAN NARRATIVE, ATTACHMENTS INCLUDED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE SWPPP, PLUS THE PERMIT AND ALL SUBSEQUENT REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS. 2.ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE SWPPP AND NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) GENERAL PERMIT, AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THEIR CONTENTS. 3.BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) AND CONTROLS SHALL CONFORM TO FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS, AS APPLICABLE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT ADDITIONAL CONTROLS AS DIRECTED BY THE PERMITTING AGENCY, ENGINEER OR OWNER. 4.SITE ENTRY AND EXIT LOCATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION THAT WILL PREVENT THE TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC ROADWAYS. SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO A PUBLIC ROADWAY FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE MUST BE REMOVED AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE. WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENTRANCE ONTO A PUBLIC ROADWAY, IT SHALL BE DONE IN AN AREA STABILIZED WITH CRUSHED STONE WHICH DRAINS INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT BASIN. ANY FINES IMPOSED FOR DISCHARGING SEDIMENT ONTO A PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY SHALL BE PAID BY THE CONTRACTOR. 5.TEMPORARY SEEDING OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS OF STABILIZATION SHALL BE INITIATED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF THE LAST DISTURBANCE ON ANY AREA OF THE SITE. 6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE LAND DISTURBANCE AND CLEARING TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICAL OR AS REQUIRED BY THE GENERAL PERMIT. 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL DENOTE ON THE PLAN THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA WHICH SHALL ALSO BE USED AS THE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND CLEANING AREA, EMPLOYEE PARKING AREA, AND AREA FOR LOCATING PORTABLE FACILITIES, OFFICE TRAILERS, AND TOILET FACILITIES. 8.ALL WASH WATER FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE (CONCRETE TRUCKS, VEHICLE CLEANING, EQUIPMENT CLEANING, ETC.) SHALL BE DETAINED AND PROPERLY TREATED BEFORE DISPOSAL. 9.SUFFICIENT OIL AND GREASE ABSORBING MATERIALS AND FLOTATION BOOMS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON SITE OR READILY AVAILABLE TO CONTAIN AND CLEAN-UP FUEL OR CHEMICAL SPILLS AND LEAKS. 10.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DUST CONTROL ON SITE. THE USE OF MOTOR OILS AND OTHER PETROLEUM BASED OR TOXIC LIQUIDS FOR DUST SUPPRESSION OPERATIONS IS PROHIBITED. 11.RUBBISH, TRASH, GARBAGE, LITTER, OR OTHER SUCH MATERIALS SHALL BE DEPOSITED INTO SEALED CONTAINERS. MATERIALS SHALL BE PREVENTED FROM LEAVING THE PREMISES THROUGH THE ACTION OF WIND OR STORM WATER DISCHARGE INTO DRAINAGE DITCHES OR WATERS OF THE STATE. 12.STAGING AREAS, STOCKPILES, SPOILS, ETC. SHALL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF DRAINAGE WAYS SUCH THAT STORM WATER RUNOFF WILL NOT BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED. PROVIDE STABILIZATION MEASURES SUCH AS PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL BMP'S, SEEDING, OR OTHER COVERING AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT EROSION. 13.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RE-ESTABLISHING ANY EROSION CONTROL BMP DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. NOTIFY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE ESTABLISHED EROSION CONTROL MEASURES THAT MAY LEAD TO UNAUTHORIZED DISCHARGE OF STORM WATER POLLUTANTS. UNAUTHORIZED POLLUTANTS INCLUDE (BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO) EXCESS CONCRETE DUMPING, CONCRETE RESIDUE, PAINTS, SOLVENTS, GREASES, FUELS, LUBRICANT OILS, PESTICIDES, AND SOLID WASTE MATERIALS. 14.EROSION CONTROL BMP'S SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE START OF LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES ON THE PROJECT, AND INITIATED AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE. 15.THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION, AND SHALL MAINTAIN COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. 16.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUST AND/OR PROVIDE ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL BMP'S AS NEEDED TO PREVENT EROSION AND OFF-SITE SEDIMENT DISCHARGE FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. LOG AND RECORD ANY ADJUSTMENTS AND DEVIATIONS FROM THE APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLANS WITHIN THE SWPPP DOCUMENTS STORED IN THE JOB SITE TRAILER. EROSION CONTROL PLAN NOTES THE CONTRACTOR MUST UPDATE THE SWPPP BY NOTING ON THE SITE MAPS IN THE JOB SITE BINDER TO REFLECT THE PROGRESS OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND GENERAL CHANGES TO THE PROJECT SITE FOR THE DURATION OF LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. AT A MINIMUM, UPDATES SHALL BE MADE DAILY TO TRACK CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS DESCRIBED IN THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTING THE LOCATION OF THE JOB SITE TRAILER, TEMPORARY PARKING & LAYDOWN AREAS, PORTA-POTTY, WHEEL WASH, CONCRETE WASHOUT, FUEL & MATERIAL STORAGE, SOLID WASTE CONTAINERS, AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION RELATED FACILITIES THAT MAY IMPACT STORMWATER RUNOFF. SWPPP UPDATES & AMENDMENTS A 2 3 4 5 6 B C D E 1 PROJECT CLIENT ARCHITECT Alliiance 400 Clifton Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55403 612.874.4100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER Meyer Borgman Johnson 801 Nicollet Mall Suite W2000 Minneapoils, MN 55402 612.338.0713 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING ENGINEERS Emanuelson-Podas, Inc. 7705 Bush Lake Rd Edina, MN 55439 952.930.0050 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Aune Fernandez Landscape Architects 755 Prior Ave N #104 St. Paul, MN 55104 661.341.3611 CIVIL ENGINEER Kimley-Horn 767 N Eustis St #100 St. Paul, MN 55114 651.645.4197 ISSUED FOR DATE Copyright Alliiance PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION COMMISSION NO Washington County Park Grove Library DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 07/25/2025 PLANNING SUBMISSION 07/30/2025 Know what's below. before you dig.Call NORTH ER O S I O N A N D S E D I M E N T CO N T R O L P L A N - P H A S E 2 C3 0 0 PHASE I BMP QUANTITIES SILT FENCE 0 LF INLET PROTECTION 2 EA BIO ROLL 0 LF EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 1,570 SF HE M I N G W A Y A V E N U E S O U T H EXISTING BUILDING ±21,181 SF FFE: 880.00 PROPOSED BUILDING ±20,355 SF AD A AD A ADAADAADA ADAADAADAADAADAAD A AD A AD A AD A R6.0' R5.0' R6.0' R6.0' R5.0' R6.0' R5.0' R5.0' R15.0' R15.0' R5.0' TYP. TYP.R4.5'R3.0' R3.0' R5.0'R5.0' R5.0' R6.0' R6.0' R6.0'R6.0' C E F J J J I J J K K K KK K II K J I J J J J J M SNOW STORAGE AREA I I M H H B B A D D D G CIP CONCRETE WALL REFER TO LANDSCAPE A A C O J RETAINING WALL BY OTHERS P P PP N Q Q PROPOSED BOOK DROP SPACE J J J L I E E F R R R R R R H H H S T ADA PATHWAY J C C CIP CONCRETE SEAT RING REFER TO LANDSCAPE Q U UU U U U I K I K Q Q Q 24 . 0 ' 18.0'24.0'20.0'20.0'24.0'18.0' 9. 0 ' 9. 0 ' 30.0' 15 1 . 0 ' 9.0' 18 . 0 ' 9. 0 ' 18.0' 5. 0 ' 5. 0 ' 5.0'8.7' 14.0' 6. 0 ' 6. 8 ' 6.0' 7. 6 ' 5. 0 ' 4.0' 32 . 0 ' 20.0' 12.0' 9.0' 18 . 0 ' 12.0' EXISTING PARKING SETBACK (TYP.) 30.0' PARKING SETBACK (TYP.) 6. 0 ' 12 . 0 ' E X I S T I N G P A R K I N G SE T B A C K ( T Y P . ) 12.0' EXISTING PARKING SETBACK (TYP.) 30.0' PARKING SETBACK (TYP.) 50.0' BUILDING SETBACK (TYP.) 50.0' 50.0' BUILDING SETBACK (TYP.) PROPERTY SUMMARY TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 2.50 AC / 108,904 SF DISTURBED AREA 1.85 AC / 80,589 SF EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 1.23 AC / 53,570 SF / 49.2% EXISTING PERVIOUS AREA 1.27 AC / 55,334 SF / 50.8% PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 1.20 AC / 52,432 SF / 48% PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 1.30 AC / 56,472 SF / 52% NET INCREASE IN IMPERVIOUS AREA 0.0 AC / 0 SF KEYNOTE LEGEND ORNAMENTAL FENCE - REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS D-428 SURMOUNTABLE CURB - SEE SHEET C701 MATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT / CURB & GUTTER ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN IN BOLLARD - SEE SHEET C700 ACCESSIBLE PARKING - SEE SHEET C700 ACCESS AREA STRIPING - SEE SHEET C700 STOP SIGN - SEE SHEET C700 LIGHT POLE - REFER TO ELECTRICAL PLANS FLUSH CURB - SEE SHEET C700 B612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.) - SEE SHEET C701 CURB TAPER - SEE SHEET C700 COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY - SEE SHEET C701 PAVEMENT MARKING - SOLID STRIPING DECORATIVE PAVERS - REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS BIKE RACKS - REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK - SEE SHEET C700 SITE FURNITURE - REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS AT-GRADE BUILDING ENTRY - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS DIGITAL MONUMENT SIGN - REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS USPS POSTAL BOX (BLUE) ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN RAMP - SEE SHEET C700 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U A 2 3 4 5 6 B C D E 1 PROJECT CLIENT ARCHITECT Alliiance 400 Clifton Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55403 612.874.4100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER Meyer Borgman Johnson 801 Nicollet Mall Suite W2000 Minneapoils, MN 55402 612.338.0713 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING ENGINEERS Emanuelson-Podas, Inc. 7705 Bush Lake Rd Edina, MN 55439 952.930.0050 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Aune Fernandez Landscape Architects 755 Prior Ave N #104 St. Paul, MN 55104 661.341.3611 CIVIL ENGINEER Kimley-Horn 767 N Eustis St #100 St. Paul, MN 55114 651.645.4197 ISSUED FOR DATE Copyright Alliiance PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION COMMISSION NO Washington County Park Grove Library DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 07/25/2025 PLANNING SUBMISSION 07/30/2025 Know what's below. before you dig.Call R NORTH LEGEND SITE DATA EXISTING ZONING HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL PROPOSED ZONING HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL PROPOSED LAND USE GOVERNMENTAL / PUBLIC USE PARKING SETBACKS EXISTING = 12' PROPOSED = 30' BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT = 50' SIDE = 50' REAR = 50' SITE PLAN NOTES 1.REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF STOOPS, TRUCK DOCKS, TRASH ENCLOSURES & PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS. REFER TO THE SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN FOR LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED LIGHT POLES, CONDUITS, AND ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT. 2.REFER TO CERTIFIED SITE SURVEY OR PLAT FOR EXACT LOCATION OF EXISTING EASEMENTS, PROPERTY BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS, AND ADJACENT RIGHT-OF-WAY & PARCEL INFORMATION. 3.DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE DRAWN TO THE FACE OF CURB, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT, AND AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. 4.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RELOCATING EXISTING SITE IMPROVEMENTS THAT CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED WORK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO TRAFFIC SIGNS, LIGHT POLES, ABOVEGROUND UTILITIES, ETC. PERFORM WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS AND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS. COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 5.TYPICAL PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS SHALL BE 9.0-FEET IN WIDTH AND 18-FEET IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. BUILDING DATA TOTAL BUILDING AREA 20,927 SF PERCENT OF TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 19.2% MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 55 FT PARKING SUMMARY REQUIRED PARKING 1 SPACE PER 300 SF TOTAL PROPOSED PARKING 68 SPACES REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE PARKING 3 STANDARD SPACES 3 VAN ACCESSIBLE PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE PARKING 3 STANDARD SPACES 3 VAN ACCESSIBLE PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED FENCE SETBACK LINE RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION CONCRETE SIDEWALK SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION PERVIOUS PAVERS SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION UNDERGROUND STONE SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION SI T E D I M E N S I O N P L A N C4 0 0 UP HE M I N G W A Y A V E N U E S O U T H EXISTING BUILDING ±21,181 SF FFE: 880.00 PROPOSED BUILDING ±20,355 SF 87 0 875 880 86 9 87 1 87 2 873 874 876 877 878 879 86 5 870 87 5 880 863 86 4 866 867 868 869 871 87 2 87 3 87 4 87 6 87 7 878 879 880 876 877 878 879 881 881 881 882 882 883 883 87 5 87 3 87 4 87 6 87 7 877 87 8 878 87 9 87 9 87 9 879 87 5 87 487 6 877 87 8 87 6 87 6 87 6 87 7 87 8 87 9 88 0 877 87 7 87 8 87 9 88 0 877 878 877 878 879 2.7 % 4.5% 3.3% 3.0% 2.6% 2.9% 2.3% 1.3% 2. 3 % PAVEDRAIN STONE VOLUME ±9,050 CF 100-YEAR HWL: 876.32 STONE DEPTH: 3.0' G:879.24 G:879.57 T/G:879.60 T/G:879.66 T/G:879.87 T/G:879.87 T/G:879.91 G:879.24 G:878.87 T/G:878.87 G:874.39 G:879.03 G:879.30 G:879.10 G:879.00 G:879.03 G:879.12 G:879.24 G:879.21 LP:878.98 G:879.08 G:879.20 G:876.13 G:876.04 G:876.02 G:875.98 G:875.90 G:875.90 G:875.88 G:875.71 G:874.45 T/G:873.85 G:875.65 G:877.83 G:877.98 G:877.33 G:877.12 1.5% 2.2 % 3.6% 4.0% 881 882 883 883 884 88 4 RD A IE:873.50 SE PERFORATED NYLOPLAST 101 RE:876.46 IE:872.44 W CONNECT TO EXISTING IE:872.14 N PERFORATED NYLOPLAST 102 RE:876.45 IE:872.44 NE CB 103 RE:875.71 IE:872.73 N IE:872.73 SW CB 104 RE:875.65 IE:872.97 W IE:872.97 S CB 105 RE:878.63 IE:875.14 E 153 LF - 6" PVC @ 0.50% 24 LF - 15" HDPE @ 1.00% 29 LF - 15" HDPE @ 1.00% 217 LF - 12" HDPE @ 1.00% 4.0% G:879.30 G:879.30 T/G:879.30 G:879.30 T/G:879.30 ME:874.35 ME:874.02 875 874 876 877 878 879 TW:880.00TW:879.75 TW:879.49 BW:877.37 BW:879.49 BW:880.00 879.91 879.82 4.9% 4.1% 3.2% 3.1% 879.80 FFE = 880.0 879.72 879.96 FFE = 880.0 879.96 879.90 879.94 FFE = 880.0 FFE = 880.0 879.86 879.81 879.74879.80 879.73 879.80 879.65 879.51 FFE = 880.0 879.67 FFE = 880.0 FFE = 880.0FFE = 880.0 876.00 FFE = 880.0 FFE = 880.0 FFE = 880.0 FFE = 880.0 FFE = 880.0 1.2 % 68 : 1 7.0% 6.3% 9:1 4:1 7: 1 3: 1 4:1 8:1 5: 1 4:1 13:1 13:1 NYLOPLAST 106 RE:879.50 IE:873.20 NW IE:873.20 E G:877.32 G:877.05 G:877.30 G:878.03 G:878.28 G:877.53G:878.34 G:878.55 879.59 879.92 879.42 879.42 879.92 879.92 FFE = 880.0 T/G:873.95 T/G:873.76 ME:874.05 ME:873.82 873.67 873.64 876.17 876.14 876.35 ME:873.54 ME:873.57 T/G:874.01 GRADING ENLARGEMENT 87 5 88 0 88 0 87 487 4876877 878879 88 0 876 877 878 879 G:879.01 T/G:879.00 T/G:879.01 879.50 879.51 879.58 879.58 G:879.93 21 L F - 6 " P V C @ 1 . 4 0 % NORTH HALF PERFORATED NYLOPLAST 100 RE:876.29 WEIR:874.94 IE:872.44 S 31 LF - 12" PVC @ 0.96% 877 87 5 87 487 6 877 87 8 4.5% 3.3% ME:873.75 G:878.87 T/G:878.87 G:874.39 T/G:878.74 T/G:878.83 G:879.03 G:875.90 G:875.88 G:875.79 G:875.71 G:874.45 T/G:873.85 G:875.65 G:877.83 G:878.01 G:878.19 G:877.98 G:877.33 G:877.16 G:877.12 3.6% G:879.30 G:879.30 T/G:879.30 ME:874.35 ME:874.02 T/G:875.81 G:875.77 T/G:875.84 4.9% 4.1% 3.2% T/G:876.99 T/G:877.08 T/G:878.05 T/G:878.14 G:877.12 G:876.95 875.55 875.58 877.49 877.58877.64 877.55878.23 878.32 878.29 878.38 878.77879.27 T/G:873.95 T/G:873.76873.82 873.93 873.90 ME:874.05 ME:873.82 873.85 879.35 G:878.91 G:878.83 G:875.87 874.40 874.34 874.35 874.29 873.96 873.98 T/G:874.01 GRADING ENLARGEMENT 87 5 88 0 87 4 87 4 876877 878 879 8.33% 1. 0 1 % 8.33% 1. 5 1 % 1.00% 6. 5 9 % 1.5% 1.4 % 1.4 % 1.1% 1.8 % 1.8 %1.8%1.6% 4.63% 1. 5 0 % 4.90% 0. 5 5 % 0.99% 2. 7 2 % 4.00% 1. 5 0 % A 2 3 4 5 6 B C D E 1 PROJECT CLIENT ARCHITECT Alliiance 400 Clifton Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55403 612.874.4100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER Meyer Borgman Johnson 801 Nicollet Mall Suite W2000 Minneapoils, MN 55402 612.338.0713 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING ENGINEERS Emanuelson-Podas, Inc. 7705 Bush Lake Rd Edina, MN 55439 952.930.0050 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Aune Fernandez Landscape Architects 755 Prior Ave N #104 St. Paul, MN 55104 661.341.3611 CIVIL ENGINEER Kimley-Horn 767 N Eustis St #100 St. Paul, MN 55114 651.645.4197 ISSUED FOR DATE Copyright Alliiance PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION COMMISSION NO Washington County Park Grove Library DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 07/25/2025 PLANNING SUBMISSION 07/30/2025 GRADING PLAN NOTES 1.PERFORM GRADING WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2.CONTACT STATE 811 CALL-BEFORE-YOU-DIG LOCATING SERVICE AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION FOR UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 4.FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS IMPACTING THE PROPOSED DESIGN OF THE PROJECT. 5.IN PAVED AREAS, ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE THE SITE READY FOR SUB-BASE. 6.SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. 7.ELEVATIONS SHOWN REPRESENT FINISHED SURFACE GRADES. SPOT ELEVATIONS ALONG CURB & GUTTER REPRESENT THE FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8.EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 9.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES THAT PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE TO COLLECTION POINTS. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 1.25% IN ASPHALT PAVEMENT AREAS AND A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 0.50% IN CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS. 10.MAINTAIN A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 0.50% ALONG CURB & GUTTER. REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD THE GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS AWAY FROM THE GUTTER. 11.INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 4-INCHES OF AGGREGATE BASE MATERIAL UNDER PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, SIDEWALKS, AND TRAILS UNLESS OTHERWISE DETAILED. 12.GRADING FOR SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES, INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS, SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT STATE & NATIONAL ADA STANDARDS: ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 8.3% (1:12). SIDEWALK CROSS-SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0%. LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 5.0%. ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS AND ACCESS AISLES SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0% IN ANY DIRECTION. A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 1.50% IS PREFERRED. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVEMENT INSTALLATION. CHANGE ORDERS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR ADA COMPLIANCE ISSUES. 13.UPON COMPLETION OF LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES, RESTORE ADJACENT OFFSITE AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION TO MATCH OR EXCEED THE ORIGINAL CONDITION. LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE RE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF 4-INCHES OF TOPSOIL. 14.EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLANS FOR LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN, AND OTHER BUILDING UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTIONS. PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR925 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION100.00 LEGEND PROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATION HP:0.0 PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATION PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT ELEVATION LP:0.0 G:0.00 T:0.00 PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ELEVATION T/G:0.0 EOF:0.0 0.0%PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION ME:0.0 MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUT PROPOSED RIPRAP PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION PROPOSED RIDGE LINE PROPOSED SWALE PROPOSED GRADE AT TOP/BOTTOM OF WALLTW:0.0 BW:0.0 STORM SEWER NOTES 1.INSTALL STORM SEWER IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY OR STATE SPECIFICATIONS, STATE PLUMBING CODE, AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2.CONTACT STATE 811 CALL-BEFORE-YOU-DIG LOCATING SERVICE AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION FOR UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS. 3.STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP: ASTM C-76 HDPE: ASTM F-714, F-894 PVC: ASTM D-2729 PVC SCH40: ASTM D-1785, D-2665, F-794 DRAIN TILE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: PE: ASTM F-6667 PVC: ASTM D-2729 FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP: ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443 HDPE: ASTM D-3212 PVC: ASTM D-2729, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212 PVC SCH40: ASTM D-2665, F-794, F-1866 4.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 5.FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS IMPACTING THE PROPOSED DESIGN OF THE PROJECT. 6.EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLANS FOR LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN, AND OTHER BUILDING UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTIONS. REFER TO THE GRADING PLAN FOR DETAILED SURFACE ELEVATIONS. 7.EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 8.COORDINATE WITH THE PLUMBING PLANS FOR THE LOCATION, SIZE AND ELEVATION OF THE PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ROOF DRAIN CONNECTIONS. 9.WHERE STORM SEWER ROOF DRAINS HAVE LESS THAN 4-FEET OF COVER IN PAVED AREAS OR 3-FEET OF COVER IN LANDSCAPE AREAS, PROVIDE 3-INCH THICK INSULATION A MINIMUM OF 5-FEET IN WIDTH, CENTERED ON THE PIPE. 10.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE JOINTS SHALL BE WATER-TIGHT CONNECTIONS. 11.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT. BOOTED COUPLERS AT THE STRUCTURE OR A WATER STOP WITH NON-SHRINK GROUT MAY BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL CODES. 12.CONTRACTOR SHALL AIR TEST ALL STORM SEWER PIPE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL CODE REQUIREMENTS. 0.00%PROPOSED GRADE BETWEEN POINTS CO D Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call R NORTH PERVIOUS PAVERS SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION UNDERGROUND STONE SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION GR A D I N G A N D D R A I N A G E P L A N C5 0 0 GRADING ENLARGEMENT A NORTH UP HE M I N G W A Y A V E N U E S O U T H EXISTING BUILDING ±21,181 SF FFE: 880.00 PROPOSED BUILDING ±20,355 SF CONNECT TO EXISTING POWER GAS SERVICE CONNECTION TO BUILDING 3" D.I.P. DOMESTIC SERVICE CONNECTION TO BUILDING EXISTING FIBER AND POWER CONNECTIONS TO BUILDING APPROXIMATE LOCATION FOR GAS SERVICE RELOCATION6" D.I.P. FIRE SERVICE CONNECTION TO BUILDING SS-200 RE:878.54 IE:872.69 W IE:872.59 NE CONNECTION TO BUILDING RE:874.89 IE:873.54 E SS-100 DROP MH RE:876.52 IE:868.20 SW IE:853.20 E CONNECT TO EXISTING MH CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXISTING INVERT ELEVATIONS RE:874.20 IE:849.78 W IE:±848.78 S 43 LF - 4" PVC @ 2.00% 88 LF - 4" PVC @ 5.00% 75 LF - 4" PVC @ 4.57% 6" x 3" REDUCING TEE 3" 90° BEND 6" GATE VALVE 3" GATE VALVE 6" 45° BEND 6" 45° BEND 6" D.I.P. WATER MAIN 6" GATE VALVE 6" WET TAP EXISTING FIBER MANHOLE EXISTING 15" HDPE STORM SEWER EXISTING 12" WATER MAIN EXISTING 12" SANITARY SEWER CONNECT TO EXISTING GAS SERVICE FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION A 2 3 4 5 6 B C D E 1 PROJECT CLIENT ARCHITECT Alliiance 400 Clifton Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55403 612.874.4100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER Meyer Borgman Johnson 801 Nicollet Mall Suite W2000 Minneapoils, MN 55402 612.338.0713 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING ENGINEERS Emanuelson-Podas, Inc. 7705 Bush Lake Rd Edina, MN 55439 952.930.0050 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Aune Fernandez Landscape Architects 755 Prior Ave N #104 St. Paul, MN 55104 661.341.3611 CIVIL ENGINEER Kimley-Horn 767 N Eustis St #100 St. Paul, MN 55114 651.645.4197 ISSUED FOR DATE Copyright Alliiance PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION COMMISSION NO Washington County Park Grove Library DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 07/25/2025 PLANNING SUBMISSION 07/30/2025 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN GATE VALVE HYDRANT TEE REDUCER UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TELEPHONE GAS MAIN STORM SEWER LEGEND CO SANITARY CLEANOUTCO EXISTING PROPOSED UTILITY PLAN NOTES 1.INSTALL UTILITIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY SPECIFICATIONS, STATE PLUMBING CODE, AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2.CONTACT STATE 811 CALL-BEFORE-YOU-DIG LOCATING SERVICE AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION FOR UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS. 3.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 4.SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE: PVC: ASTM D-2729, D-3034 PVC SCH 40: ASTM D-1785, F-714, F-894 SANITARY SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE: PVC: ASTM D-2729, D-3034 PVC SCH40: ASTM D-2665, F-2794, F-1866 5.WATER MAIN PIPE SHALL BE: DUCTILE IRON: AWWA C-151 WATER MAIN FITTINGS SHALL BE: DUCTILE IRON: AWWA C-153, C-111, ASME 316.4 5.STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE: RCP: ASTM C-76 HDPE: ASTM F-714, F-894 PVC: ASTM D-2729 PVC SCH40: ASTM D-1785, D-2665, F-794 DRAIN TILE SHALL BE: PE: ASTM F-6667 PVC: ASTM D-2729 STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE: RCP: ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443 PVC: ASTM D-2729, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212 PVC SCH40: ASTM D-2665, F-794, F-1866 6.WHEN CONNECTING TO AN EXISTING UTILITY LINE, FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATION, DEPTH, AND SIZE OF THE EXISTING PIPE(S) PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF THE NEW LINES. NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS IMPACTING THE PROPOSED DESIGN OF THE PROJECT. 7.PLACE AND COMPACT ALL FILL MATERIAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. MINIMUM TRENCH WIDTH SHALL BE 2 FEET. 8.MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 7'-6" COVER ON ALL WATER LINES. 9.FOR WATER LINES AND STUB-OUTS UTILIZE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH RESTRAINTS SUCH AS THRUST BLOCKING, WITH STAINLESS STEEL OR COBALT BLUE BOLTS, OR AS INDICATED IN THE CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 10.MAINTAIN 18-INCH MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION WHERE SEWER PIPE CROSSES WATER LINES (OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE OR STRUCTURE). PROVIDE 10-FOOT HORIZONTAL SEPARATION BETWEEN SEWER PIPE AND WATER LINES. 11.IN THE EVENT OF A VERTICAL CONFLICT BETWEEN WATER LINES, SANITARY LINES, STORM LINES AND GAS LINES (OR ANY OBSTRUCTION EXISTING AND PROPOSED), THE SANITARY PIPE MATERIAL SHALL BE PVC SCHEDULE 40 OR PVC C900 AND HAVE MECHANICAL JOINTS AT LEAST 10 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE CROSSING. THE WATER LINE SHALL HAVE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH APPROPRIATE FASTENERS AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 18-INCH VERTICAL SEPARATION MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI A21.10 OR ANSI 21.11 (AWWA C-151) (CLASS 50). 12.ALL PVC & HDPE SEWER AND WATER PIPE SHALL HAVE A TRACER WIRE INSTALLED IN THE TRENCH AND TERMINATED PER THE DETAILS. 13.UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES SHALL BE INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO PLACING BACKFILL. 14.IN PAVEMENT AREAS, RAISE MANHOLE CASTINGS TO BE FLUSH WITH PROPOSED FINISHED SURFACE GRADE. IN GREEN AREAS, RAISE MANHOLE CASTINGS TO BE ONE FOOT ABOVE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATION & INSTALL A WATERTIGHT LID. 15.REFER TO PLUMBING PLANS FOR LOCATION, SIZE AND ELEVATION OF UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTIONS AND ROOF DRAINS TO THE INTERIOR BUILDING SYSTEMS. BACKFLOW DEVICES (DDCV AND PRZ ASSEMBLIES) & METERS ARE LOCATED INSIDE THE BUILDING. 16.CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 17.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES. COORDINATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 18.REFER TO THE SITE ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR SPECIFICATIONS OF THE PROPOSED SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT. 19.EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLANS FOR LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN, AND OTHER BUILDING UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTIONS. REFER TO THE GRADING PLAN FOR DETAILED SURFACE ELEVATIONS. 20.EXCESS MATERIAL, ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNUSABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 21.COORDINATE WITH THE PLUMBING PLANS FOR THE LOCATION, SIZE AND ELEVATION OF THE PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ROOF DRAIN CONNECTIONS. 22.WHERE STORM SEWER ROOF DRAINS HAVE LESS THAN 4-FEET OF COVER IN PAVED AREAS OR 3-FEET OF COVER IN LANDSCAPE AREAS, PROVIDE 3-INCH THICK INSULATION A MINIMUM OF 5-FEET IN WIDTH, CENTERED ON THE PIPE. 23.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE JOINTS SHALL BE WATER-TIGHT CONNECTIONS. 24.PER THE CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE, MINIMUM COVER ON STORM SEWER SHALL BE 3' WITHIN STREET, 2' IN GREEN SPACE. 25.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT. BOOTED COUPLERS AT THE STRUCTURE OR A WATER STOP WITH NON-SHRINK GROUT MAY BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL CODES. 26.CONTRACTOR SHALL AIR TEST ALL STORM SEWER PIPE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL CODE REQUIREMENTS. Know what's below. before you dig.Call R NORTH UNDERGROUND STONE SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION UT I L I T Y P L A N C6 0 0 A 2 3 4 5 6 B C D E 1 PROJECT CLIENT ARCHITECT Alliiance 400 Clifton Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55403 612.874.4100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER Meyer Borgman Johnson 801 Nicollet Mall Suite W2000 Minneapoils, MN 55402 612.338.0713 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING ENGINEERS Emanuelson-Podas, Inc. 7705 Bush Lake Rd Edina, MN 55439 952.930.0050 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Aune Fernandez Landscape Architects 755 Prior Ave N #104 St. Paul, MN 55104 661.341.3611 CIVIL ENGINEER Kimley-Horn 767 N Eustis St #100 St. Paul, MN 55114 651.645.4197 ISSUED FOR DATE Copyright Alliiance PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION COMMISSION NO Washington County Park Grove Library DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 07/25/2025 PLANNING SUBMISSION 07/30/2025 20" 5'-0" 6" MATCH GEOMETRY OF CURB & GUTTER 6" 1" A T L A Y D O W N C U R B 0" A T R I B B O N C U R B NOTES: 1.REFER TO CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DETAIL FOR SPECIFICATIONS AND AGGREGATE BASE COURSE DIMENSIONS NO SCALE CONCRETE CURB TAPER4 4" STEEL TROWLED EDGES AND JOINTS COARSE BROOM FINISH 1/2" EXPANSION JOINT VERY 60', CONTRACTION JOINT EVERY 6' MEMBRANE CURING COMPOUND (200 SF/GALLON) (STD. WALK AND MEDIAN ONLY 4" CONCRETE WALK COMPACTED, APPROVED SUBGRADE NOTES: 1.ALL EXCAVATION, COMPACTION AND BACKFILL INCIDENTAL TO UNIT PRICE BID FOR 4" SIDEWALK NO SCALE CONCRETE SIDEWALK3 2" WEAR COURSE ASPHALT CONCRETE PROPERLY PREPARED FILLS, NATURAL SUB-GRADE SOILS, AND/OR STRUCTURAL SITE GRADING FILL 6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE TACK COAT 2" NON WEAR COURSE ASPHALT CONCRETE NO SCALE STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVMENT SECTION1 PAVEMENT SECTIONS SHOWN ARE PROVIDED AS A REFERENCE ONLY. REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR ALL PAVEMENT, SUBGRADE PREPARATION AND COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS. NO SCALE HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVMENT SECTION2 CONCRETE APPROVED DENSE GRADED AGGREGATE HOT TAR SEAL SCALE: NTS CONCRETE TO ASPHALT TRANSITION DETAIL9 SCALE: NTS EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (SLOPE INSTALLATION)10 IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS AS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION. STAPLES/STAKES SPACED APPROXIMATELY 12" APART ACROSS THE WIDTH OF THE BLANKET. PORTION OF BLANKET BACK OVER SEED AND COMPACTED SOIL. SECURE BLANKET OVER COMPACTED SOIL WITH A ROW OF BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER STAPLING. APPLY SEED TO COMPACTED SOIL AND FOLD REMAINING 12" DETAIL 2. ANCHOR THE BLANKET WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/STAKES APPROXIMATELY 12" APART IN THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. WITH APPROXIMATELY 12" OF BLANKET EXTENDED BEYOND THE UP-SLOPE PORTION OF THE TRENCH AS SHOWN IN PLACE THE EDGE OF THE OVERLAPPING BLANKET (BLANKET BEING INSTALLED ON TOP) EVEN WITH THE SEAM STITCH ON THE PREVIOUSLY INSTALLED BLANKET. 3" OVERLAP. STAPLE THROUGH OVERLAPPED AREA, APPROXIMATELY 12" APART ACROSS ENTIRE AGAINST THE SOIL SURFACE. ALL BLANKETS MUST BE SECURELY FASTENED TO SOIL SURFACE BY PLACING STAPLES/STAKES 1. IN LOOSE SOIL CONDITIONS, THE USE OF STAPLE OR STAKE LENGTHS GREATER THAN 6" MAY BE NECESSARY TO 1. PROPERLY SECURE THE BLANKETS. NOTES: BLANKET WIDTH. 3B. 3A. 4. 5. 2. 2. FOLLOW EROSION CONTROL TECHNOLOGY COUNCIL SPECIFICATION FOR PRODUCT SELECTION. 6" 8" 12" 4'-6" 3. PERVIOUS LAND WITH SLOPES RUNNING GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 4:1 SHALL CONTAIN SLOPE STABILIZATION BLANKET STEEL PIPE BOLLARD STEEL SIGN POST RESERVED PARKING VAN ACCESSIBLE PAVEMENT FINISHED GRADE CONCRETE FOOTING 18" 3' - 0 " 5' - 0 " 3' - 6 " 4" EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL NOTES: 1.SIGNS SHALL BE 18 GAUGE STEEL, WITH BAKED ENAMEL WHITE LETTERS AND BORDER ON BLUE BACKGROUND, WHERE APPLICABLE. 2.POST SHALL BE 3"x3" 11-GAUGE GALVANIZED SQUARE STEEL 3.BOLLARD SHALL BE 6"Ø SCH-40 STEEL PIPE FILLED WITH CONCRETE & PAINTED YELLOW 4.SIGNS SHALL COMPLY WITH LOCAL MUTCD REQUIREMENTS 12"x8" VAN-ACCESSIBLE SIGN 12"x8" HANDICAP PARKING SIGN N.T.S. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN IN BOLLARD11 NO SCALE HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE SIGNAGE AND STRPING7 10" DIAMETER CENTER SYMBOL IN PARKING STALL, ALL LINES TO BE 5" WIDE. 2' 2' 2' 67 . 5 ° 5° HANDICAP SYMBOL N.T.S. ACCESS AISLE STRIPING LAYOUT8 NOTE: IS DIMENSION SHOWN ON SITE PLAN O NOTE: 1.LETTERING SHALL BE 12" HIGH, 6" WIDE, 2" THICK, SPACED 3" APART, OR AS APPROVED BY OWNER. 2.NOTIFY ENGINEER OF STENCIL BEING USED AND SUBMIT LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL. NO PARKING 3"6" 3" 6" N P A R K I N G MIN TO LINE 3" MIN TO LINE 4" WIDE STRIPE (MIN.) (TYP) 5" MAX. STRIPING 4' O.C. (TYP.) 4" WIDE STRIPE (MIN.) 6" WIDE STRIPE (TYP.) 8'-0" MIN. ℄℄℄ 12" WIDE STRIPE 45° 30"x30" R1-1 STEEL SIGN POST NOTES: 1.SIGNS SHALL BE 18 GAUGE STEEL 2.POSTS SHALL BE GALVANIZED STEEL U-CHANNEL, PERFORATED WITH 3/8" HOLES AT 1" CENTERS 3.SIGNS SHALL COMPLY WITH LOCAL MUTCD REQUIREMENTS FINISHED GRADE 7' - 0 " 3' - 6 " BREAK-AWAY 3/8"Ø PAN HEAD MACHINE SCREW w/HEX NUT & WASHERS 6" M A X SCALE: NTS TRAFFIC SIGN POST12 SCALE: NTS SILT FENCE13 6" 30 " 52 " 2" 8' MAX. 1-1/8" x 1-1/8" WOOD STAKE REINFORCING CORD STAPLES BOTTOM OF FABRIC EXTENDED INTO TRENCH COMPACTED BACKFILL GROUND SURFACE 6" x 6" TRENCH GROUND SURFACE WOOD STAKE MIRAFI INC. ENVIROFENCE OR APPROVED EQUAL FABRIC FILTER FABRIC FLOW SIDE VIEWFRONT VIEW COMPACTED BACKFILL FIBER BIOLOG (IMPERVIOUS SURFACES) 10' 6" - 8 " 1.0'2.0'2.0'2.0'2.0'1.0' 6" - 8 " STAGGER JOINTS 2.0'2.0'4.0'4.0' 5 POUND SAND BAG DIR E C T I O N O F RU N O F F F L O W 2" X 2" X 2' WOOD STAKES DIRECTION O F RUNOFF FL O W DIRECTION O F RUNOFF FL O W FIBER BIOLOG (PERVIOUS SURFACES) NOTES: 1.STRAW WATTLE SHALL BE COMPACTED STRAW AND/OR ORGANIC FIBER MATERIAL. 2.STRAW OR FIBER SHALL BE WRAPPED IN UV STABILIZED DEGRADABLE TUBULAR POLYPROPYLENE PLASTIC NETTING. SCALE: NTS BIOROLL14 NOTE: 1. TAPED AREAS TO BE CENTERED AND ALIGNED ON CENTER LINE AND LANE LINES. MAKE ADJUSTMENTS IN CENTER MEDIAN AREA. 2. ZEBRA CROSSWALKS SHALL BE WHITE POLYMER-PREFORMED TAPE OR AN ACCEPTABLE EQUALIVANT APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 3. A MINIMUM OF 1.5 FT. CLEAR DISTANCE MUST BE LEFT ADJACENT TO CURB. IF LAST STRIPED AREA FALLS INTO THIS DISTANCE, IT MUST BE OMITTED. 4. REMOVE ALL CONFLICTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 5. AT SKEWED CROSSWALKS, THE TAPED AREAS ARE TO REMAIN PARALLEL TO THE LANE LINES. 6. WHERE PAVEMENT MARKINGS CAN NOT BE INLAYED INTO THE HOT MAT, PAVEMENT SHALL BE GROOVED FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE POLYMER-PREFORMED MARKINGS. SEE Mn/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 2564. 6' 3' 3' PAVEMENT MARKING (TYP.)DRIVING LANE (WIDTH VARIES) DRIVING LANE (WIDTH VARIES) ℄ ROAD NO SCALE CROSSWALK STRIPING6 12" 6"6" N.T.S. FLUSH CURB5 3/8" 4" MNDOT SPEC 2211 CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE BASE COURSE TOP MAT BIT. 1/2" R 1/2" R CI V I L D E T A I L S C7 0 0 A 2 3 4 5 6 B C D E 1 PROJECT CLIENT ARCHITECT Alliiance 400 Clifton Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55403 612.874.4100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER Meyer Borgman Johnson 801 Nicollet Mall Suite W2000 Minneapoils, MN 55402 612.338.0713 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING ENGINEERS Emanuelson-Podas, Inc. 7705 Bush Lake Rd Edina, MN 55439 952.930.0050 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Aune Fernandez Landscape Architects 755 Prior Ave N #104 St. Paul, MN 55104 661.341.3611 CIVIL ENGINEER Kimley-Horn 767 N Eustis St #100 St. Paul, MN 55114 651.645.4197 ISSUED FOR DATE Copyright Alliiance PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION COMMISSION NO Washington County Park Grove Library DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 07/25/2025 PLANNING SUBMISSION 07/30/2025 CI V I L D E T A I L S C7 0 1 A 2 3 4 5 6 B C D E 1 PROJECT CLIENT ARCHITECT Alliiance 400 Clifton Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55403 612.874.4100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER Meyer Borgman Johnson 801 Nicollet Mall Suite W2000 Minneapoils, MN 55402 612.338.0713 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING ENGINEERS Emanuelson-Podas, Inc. 7705 Bush Lake Rd Edina, MN 55439 952.930.0050 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Aune Fernandez Landscape Architects 755 Prior Ave N #104 St. Paul, MN 55104 661.341.3611 CIVIL ENGINEER Kimley-Horn 767 N Eustis St #100 St. Paul, MN 55114 651.645.4197 ISSUED FOR DATE Copyright Alliiance PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION COMMISSION NO Washington County Park Grove Library DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 07/25/2025 PLANNING SUBMISSION 07/30/2025 CI V I L D E T A I L S C7 0 2 SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT QTY TREES AJ Acer rubrum ` JFS-KW78` / Armstrong Gold Columnar Maple 3" BB 3 AS Acer x freemanii `Sienna` / Sienna Glen® Maple 3" BB 7 BPO Betula populifolia `Whitespire` / Whitespire Birch 12` Clump 5 GC Gymnocladus dioicus 'UMNSynergy' / True North™ Kentucky Coffeetree 3" BB 7 MB Malus x 'Red Barron' / Red Barron Crabapple 3" BB 14 PN Pinus nigra / Austrian Pine 8' BB 18 TO2 Thuja occidentalis `Techny` / Techny Arborvitae 7` BB 33 SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE QTY SHRUBS HJ Hydrangea paniculata 'Jane' / Little Lime® Panicle Hydrangea #10 Cont.44 RG Rhus aromatica `Gro-Low` / Gro-Low Fragrant Sumac #5 Cont.135 SM Syringa meyeri `Palibin` / Dwarf Korean Lilac #7 Cont.65 PERRENIALS CK Calamagrostis x acutiflora `Karl Foerster` / Feather Reed Grass #1 Cont.409 MP Miscanthus sinensis `Purpurescens` / Flame Grass #3 Cont.16 SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT SPACING QTY SHRUB AREAS JB2 Juniperus sabina 'Buffalo' / Buffalo Juniper #5 Cont.36" o.c.65 GROUND COVERS PP Poa pratensis / Kentucky Bluegrass sod 31,159 sf d d d d HJ #10 Cont. 44 d d d AS 3" BB 1 PN 8' BB 3 PN 8' BB 4 PN 8' BB 2 PN 8' BB 5 PN 8' BB 3 PN 8' BB 1 CK #1 Cont. 162 MP #3 Cont. 15 CK #1 Cont. 42 CK #1 Cont. 78 CK #1 Cont. 20 JB2 #5 Cont. 65 BPO 12` Clump 5 TO2 7` BB 33 AJ 3" BB 3 RG #5 Cont. 13 RG #5 Cont. 24 GC 3" BB 1 GC 3" BB 1 RG #5 Cont. 12 AS 3" BB 4 SM #7 Cont. 60 RG #5 Cont. 30 RG #5 Cont. 25 GC 3" BB 2 AS 3" BB 2 GC 3" BB 1 GC 3" BB 1 RG #5 Cont. 31 MB 3" BB 14 GC 3" BB 1 SM #7 Cont. 4 p a r k g r o v e l i b r a r y h e m m i n g w a y a v e n u e s . d CK #1 Cont. 107 2 L1.00 3 L1.00 5 L1.00 4 L1.00 WEST READING TERRACE ENLARGEMENT PLAN SHRUB, TYP. STEEL EDGE, TYP. DECIDUOUS TREE, TYP. CONIFEROUS TREE, TYP. (4)BIKE RACKS SPECIALTY CONCRETE, SEE SPEC PRESERVE EXISTING TREES PRESERVE EXISTING TREES PRESERVE EXISTING TREES PERVIOUS PAVERS SEE CIVIL P R O P E R T Y L I N E P R O P E R T Y L I N E P R O P E R T Y L I N E P R O P E R T Y L I N E SODDING LIMITS 5 L2.00 SITE BENCH TYP. (6'-0"L) 5 L2.00 SITE BENCH TYP. (11'-3"L) 1 L2.00CIP CONC. SEAT RING 7 L2.00(7) BOULDER TYP. 13 L2.00 4' ORNAMENTAL FENCE TYP. 12 L2.00 ORNAMENTAL FENCE GATE TYP. MAIL COLLECTION BOX, BY OTHERS DIGITAL MONUMENT SIGN 8 L2.00 TRASH & RECYCLING SET, SEE SPEC 16" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE (40 MIL, 1-1/2" WIDE STRAP) (TYPICAL) DOUBLE STRAND 14 GA. WIRE, 2 SPACED EQUALLY AT OPPOSITE SIDES MULCH REFER TO SPECIFICATION) PLANTING SOIL PER SPECIFICATION GROUNDCOVER, PER PLAN TOPSOIL ROOTBALL TO SIT ON SUBGRADE, CUT ALL ROPES AND REMOVE NON-ORGANIC CONTAINERS. IF B&B STOCK, REMOVE BURLAP AND ROPES FROM TOP 1/3RD OF ROOT BALL, CUT WIRE BASKET DOWN TO SECOND HORIZONTAL WIRE FROM THE BOTTOM, AND DISPOSE OF OFF-SITE. IF CONTAINER STOCK, REMOVE CONTAINER SUBGRADE EXPOSE ROOT FLARE BY REMOVING EXCESS SOIL FROM THE TOP OF THE SOIL BALL AND ENSURE THAT THE FIRST MAIN LATERAL ROOT IS WITHIN TWO INCHES OF FINISHED GRADE WITHOUT EXCEEDING FINISHED GRADE 12" MIN 18" MIN 6'-0" STEEL STAKE 4' - 0 " + / - 2' M I N . NOTES: 1.CONIFER TO HAVE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. NO MULCH TO BE IN CONTACT WITH TRUNK. 2.SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING. 3.TWO ALTERNATE METHODS OF TREE STAKING ARE ILLUSTRATED. 4.IT IS THE CONTRACTORS OPTION TO STAKE TREES; HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. 5.DO NOT PLANT TOO DEEP: EXPOSE TOP OF ROOT FLARE AND PULL MULCH AWAY FROM TRUNK. VA R I E S 2' M I N . 18" MIN 6'-0" STEEL STAKE DOUBLE STRAND 14 GA. WIRE, 3'0" @ 120' INTERVALS (TYPICAL) 16" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE (40 MIL, 1-1/2" WIDE STRAP) (TYPICAL) FLAGGING (ONE PER WIRE) MULCH REFER TO SPECIFICATION PLANTING SOIL, PER SPECIFICATION WOOD OR STEEL STAKE SET AT ANGLE GROUNDCOVER, PER PLAN ROOTBALL TO SIT ON SUBGRADE, CUT ALL ROPES AND REMOVE INORGANIC CONTAINERS SUBGRADE NOTES: 1.HAND LOOSEN ROOTS OF CONTAINERIZED MATERIAL (TYPICAL). 2.SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING. 3.SHRUBS TO SIT ON SUBGRADE. 4.APPLY PELLET WEED PREVENTER PRIOR TO MULCHING. PER PLAN PLANTING SOIL PER SPECIFICATION MULCH 4" DEPTH, REFER TO SPECIFICATION GROUNDCOVER PER PLAN TOPSOIL APPROVED SUBGRADE SLIT ORGANIC CONTAINER OR REMOVE INORGANIC CONT. BED MEDIA OR AGGREGATE 1 4"x5"X16' STEEL EDGING, PAINTED BLACK FINISH 15" (MIN.)STEEL STAKES LOCKED INTO EDGING, DOUBLE STAKES BOTH ENDS & 32"(MAX.) O.C. SINGLE STAKE SPACING THRU EDGING LOCKING SLOTS A 2 3 4 5 6 B C D E 1 PROJECT CLIENT ARCHITECT Alliiance 400 Clifton Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55403 612.874.4100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER Meyer Borgman Johnson 801 Nicollet Mall, Suite W2000 Minneapoils, MN 55402 612.338.0713 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING ENGINEERS Emanuelson-Podas, Inc. 7705 Bush Lake Rd Edina, MN 55439 952.930.0050 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Aune Fernandez Landscape Architects 755 Prior Ave N #104 St. Paul, MN 55104 661.341.3611 CIVIL ENGINEER Kimley-Horn 767 N Eustic St #100 St. Paul, MN 55114 651.645.4197 ISSUED FOR DATE Copyright Alliiance PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION COMMISSION NO 5/ 2 2 / 2 0 2 5 1 1 : 4 2 : 3 2 A M Washington County Park Grove Library Client's Project Number (Optional) Phase Information (Optional) 2024 2025029 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SUBMISSION 07/25/2025 07/30/2025 La n d s c a p e p l a n L1 . 0 0 twenty 0'10'20'40' n 1 A B IRRIGATION: PROVIDE IRRIGATION FOR SOD AND PLANTING AREAS WITHIN THE PROJECT BOUNDARIES FOR 100 % COVERAGE. REFER TO DESIGN BUILD IRRIGATION SPECIFICATION. PROVIDE SHOP DRAWING FOR IRRIGATION SYSTEM INCLUDING HEAD LAYOUT, SPACING, TYPE, BACKFLOW PREVENTER LOCATIONS, POINT OF CONNECTION, SLEEVES, CONTROLLER, VALVE BOX LOCATIONS, ZONE INDICATIONS AND PIPE SIZING. PROVIDE ON-SITE OPERATION TUTORIAL FOR OWNER AN INCLUDE ALL MANUALS AND INFORMATION ON THE SYSTEM 3 4" TRAP ROCK MULCH INSTALLED TO A 4" DEPTH OVER NON WOVEN LANDSCAPE FABRIC (SEE HATCH) key notes 1.CONFIRM ALL QUANTITIES, SHAPES AND LOCATIONS OF BEDS, AND ADJUST AS REQUIRED TO CONFORM TO THE SITE CONDITIONS. CONFIRM ANY ADJUSTMENTS WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 2.LOCATE ALL UTILITIES. NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY CONFLICTS WITH NEW CONSTRUCTION. 3.ALL PLANTING BEDS SHALL RECEIVE 6" MIN. OF PLANTING SOIL. REFER TO SOIL NOTES FOR PLANTING SOIL MIX REQUIREMENTS. 4.ALL SOD AREAS SHALL RECEIVE 6" OF TOP SOIL. REFER TO SOIL NOTES FOR TOP SOIL MIX REQUIREMENTS. 5.ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL RECEIVE HARDWOOD SHREDDED MULCH APPLIED TO 4" DEPTH WITH PELLET WEED PREVENTER UNDER ALL MULCH BEDS UNLESS INDICATED AS OTHER MULCH ON PLANS. 6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE FROM THE SITE ALL SOD/TURF WHICH HAS BEEN REMOVED FOR NEW PLANT BEDS. ANY PLANT STOCK NOT PLANTED ON DAY OF DELIVERY SHALL BE HEELED IN AND WATERED UNTIL INSTALLATION. PLANTS NOT MAINTAINED IN THIS MANNER WILL BE REJECTED. 7.THE PLAN TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER THE PLANT SCHEDULE IF DISCREPANCIES EXIST. ADVISE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL AVOID DAMAGING EXISTING TREES. DO NOT STORE OR DRIVE HEAVY MATERIALS OVER TREE ROOTS. DO NOT DAMAGE TREE BARK OR BRANCHES. 9.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP PAVEMENTS, FIXTURES AND BUILDINGS CLEAN AND UNSTAINED. ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING FACILITIES SHALL BE REPAIRED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. THE PROJECT SITE SHALL BE KEPT CLEAR OF CONSTRUCTION WASTES AND DEBRIS. 10.THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PLANTING SOIL QUANTITIES TO COMPLETE THE WORK SHOWN ON THE PLAN. MULCH, PLANTING SOIL AND OTHER MISCELLANEOUS PLANTING COMPONENTS SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE RELATED PLAN. VERIFY ALL QUANTITIES. 11.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WATERING AND ALL PLANT CARE UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE BY THE OWNER. 12.PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE PROTECTED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL THE INSTALLATION OF PLANTINGS IS COMPLETE, INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND PLANTING IS ACCEPTED EXCLUSIVE OF THE GUARANTEE 13.MAINTENANCE SHALL INCLUDE WATERING, WEEDING, MULCHING, REMOVAL OF DEAD MATERIAL PRIOR TO GROWING SEASON, RE-SETTING PLANTS AND PROPER GRADE, AND KEEPING PLANTS IN A PLUMB POSITION. AFTER ACCEPTANCE, THE OWNER SHALL ASSUME MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES. HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTINUE TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR KEEPING THE TREES PLUMB THROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. 14.WATERING: MAINTAIN A WATERING SCHEDULE WHICH WILL THOROUGHLY WATER ALL PLANTS ONCE A WEEK AND SOD EVERY OTHER DAY UNTIL ACCEPTANCE BY THE OWNER. IN EXTREMELY HOT, DRY WEATHER, WATER MORE OFTEN AS REQUIRED BY INDICATIONS OF HEAT STRESS SUCH AS WILTING LEAVES. CHECK MOISTURE UNDER MULCH PRIOR TO WATERING TO DETERMINE NEED. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE THE NECESSARY ARRANGEMENTS FOR WATER. planting notes ALL PLANTING BEDS SHALL RECEIVE 12" PULVERIZED LOAM TOPSOIL BORROW MN DOT SPEC. 3877-2B ENHANCE WITH AGED AND SCREEN COMPOST ALL SODDED(LAWN) AREA SHALL RECEIVE 6" MIN. COMMON TOPSOIL BORROW MN DOT SPEC. 3877-1A soils notes planting schedule scale: 1"=20' landscape plan1 TREE PRESERVATION CALCULATIONS TOTAL EXISTING TREE QUALIFYING INCHES (DBH)257" PERMITTED TREE REMOVAL THRESHOLD (DBH)40% PERMITTED INCHES (DBH) THAT CAN BE REMOVED 102" TREES BEING REMOVED ON SITE (DBH)47" city of cottage grove calculations SITE CALCULATIONS PARCEL AREA 2.5 ACRES BUILDING AREA 0.48 ACRES (19%) PARKING AREA 0.57 ACRES (23%) DRIVEWAY AREA 0.12 ACRES (4.8%) SIDEWALK AREA 0.04 ACRES (1.6%) LANDSCAPED AREA 1.29 ACRES (52%) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 22 2 22 2 scale: 1/4"=1' deciduous tree2 scale: 1/4"=1' coniferous tree3 scale: 1/4"=1' shrub4 scale: 1/4"=1' steel edging5 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 A A A A A A A A A A B B NOTE: TYPICAL SECTION SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY. ACTUAL CONDITIONS VARY. SEE PLAN FOR LAYOUT 48"-60"L x 18"-30"W x 18"x30"H LIMESTONE OUTCROPPING. COORDINATE W/ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO SELECT BOULDERS FROM SUPPLIER. SET FLAT SIDE DOWN & BURY BOTTOM 1/3 OF BOULDER. FIELD COORDINATE LOCATIONS W/ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT COMPACTED & APPROVED SUBGRADE 14 " - 2 0 " TOW: 880.00 887.50 MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL FINISHED GRADE 12 L2.00 4' ORNAMENTAL FENCE TYP. 11 L2.00 2 L2.00 CONC. PAVING TYP., SEE CIVIL R12'-0" R11'-0" R1'-6"17 2 ° SLOPE TOP OF SEAT WALL DOWN AT CONSTANT SLOPE TO MEET FLUSH W/ TOP OF CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONC. PAVING TYP., SEE CIVIL 60° 1'-0" TOW: +18" TOW: +18" TOW: 0" CIP CONC. SEAT WALL 26 ' - 1 0 1316" 12'-6 13 16 " 3 L2.00 SAND-BLASTED LETTERING3 L2.00 4 L2.00 TOW: +18"TOW: +18" TOW: 0"FINISHED GRADE, SEE CIVIL 4 L2.00 CIP CONC. SEAT WALL TYP. XXX XXX X XX XXXX XXX4" 3" 1/4" DEEP SANDBLASTED LETTERING FILLED W/ EPOXY PAINT. FONT AND COLOR TBD. QUOTE TO BE PROVIDED BY OWNER. VA R I E S , 18 " M A X . 1' - 0 " CIP CONCRETE SEAT WALL, LIGHT BROOM FINISH TOP COMPACTED CLASS 5 AGGREGATE 1'-6" 8" 1/2" RADIUS ON ALL EXPOSED EDGES AND CORNERS #4 STIRRUPS @ 12" O.C. 2" C L R . A L L SI D E S (6)#5 HORIZ. BAR CONT. 12" O.C. COMPACTED AND APPROVED SUBGRADE SEE CIVIL GRADING PLAN FOR FINAL WALL HEIGHT NOTE: MODULAR BLOCK WALL SYSTEM W/ CAP. BLOCK SYSTEM DIMENSIONS VARY PER INDIVIDUAL MANUF.REFER TO BLOCK MANUF.FOR GEO-GRID REINFORCEMENT REQUIREMENTS. PROVIDE ENGINEERED DRAWINGs FOR WALLS OVER 4'-0" 4" PERF. PIPE 1 1 2 " CLEAN ROCK BACKFILL GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 12" COMPACTED CLASS 5 BASE CAP BLOCK SHALL BE ADHERED TO WALL SYSTEM WITH MASONRY ADHESIVE DRAIN PRO RETAINING WALL BLOCK DRAIN LAYOUT PER MANUF. RECOMENDATION, COLOR TO MATCH RET. WALL LENGTH VARIES-SEE PLANS 18 " M I N 6" M I N 6" M I N PRECAST BENCH. REINFORCEMENT PER MANF. BACKLESS WOOD BENCH TOP WITH ARMRESTS, TYP.SEE SPECS FOR TYPE & MANF. ANCHOR BOLT ATTACHMENT PER MANF. RECOMMENDATIONS. 6" CLASS V BASE, TYP. COMPACTED AND APPROVED SUB-BASE, SEE CIVIL FINISHED GRADE VARIES, SEE CIVIL. 6 L2.00 PRECAST BENCH. REINFORCEMENT PER MANF. BACKLESS WOOD BENCH TOP WITH ARMRESTS, TYP.SEE SPECS FOR TYPE & MANF. ANCHOR BOLT ATTACHMENT PER MANF. RECOMMENDATIONS. 6" M I N 6" M I N 6" CLASS V BASE, TYP. PLANTING SOIL, TYP. COMPACTED AND APPROVED SUB-BASE, SEE CIVIL 18 " M I N 1/2" EXP. JNT. TYP. CONC. PAVING, SEE CIVIL 14" CONCRETE SONOTUBE TO FROST DEPTH OMEGA II CLASSIC PANEL FENCE 8'-03 4" 4' - 0 " NOTE: ALL FENCE COMPONENTS GALVANIZED AND POLYESTER POWDER COATED 4'-0" OPENING 4' - 0 " OMEGA II CLASSIC 4'-0"H GATE ASSEMBLY VERIFY LATCHING AND SECURITY WITH OWNER / ARCHITECT 14" CONCRETE SONOTUBE TO FROST DEPTH 29 ' - 0 " 26'-5" 9 L2.00 11 L2.00 10 L2.00 MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL TYP. 4' ORNAMENTAL FENCE TYP. SPECIALTY CONCRETE PAVING 32 ' - 0 " 20'-0" 12'-0" 11 L2.00 24'-6" 41 ' - 2 3 8" 12 L2.00 BUILDING STOOP, SEE ARCH ORNAMENTAL FENCE GATE TYP. 13 L2.00 11 L2.00 2' - 0 " 2'-0" 16'-6"4'-0"4'-0" SAWCUT JNT. TYP. (4) BOOTH SEAT TYP., SEE SPEC (2) BOOTH TABLE TYP., SEE SPEC (2) DINING CHAIR TYP., SEE SPEC (2) LOUNGE CHAIR TYP., SEE SPEC TOW: 880.00 887.50 MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL FINISHED GRADE 12 L2.004' ORNAMENTAL FENCE TYP. 11 L2.00 scale: 1/2" = 1'-0" boulder typ.7 A 2 3 4 5 6 B C D E 1 PROJECT CLIENT ARCHITECT Alliiance 400 Clifton Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55403 612.874.4100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER Meyer Borgman Johnson 801 Nicollet Mall, Suite W2000 Minneapoils, MN 55402 612.338.0713 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING ENGINEERS Emanuelson-Podas, Inc. 7705 Bush Lake Rd Edina, MN 55439 952.930.0050 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Aune Fernandez Landscape Architects 755 Prior Ave N #104 St. Paul, MN 55104 661.341.3611 CIVIL ENGINEER Kimley-Horn 767 N Eustic St #100 St. Paul, MN 55114 651.645.4197 ISSUED FOR DATE Copyright Alliiance PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION COMMISSION NO 5/ 2 2 / 2 0 2 5 1 1 : 4 2 : 3 2 A M Washington County Park Grove Library Client's Project Number (Optional) Phase Information (Optional) 2024 2025029 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SUBMISSION 07/25/2025 07/30/2025 De t a i l s L2 . 0 0 scale: 1/2" = 1'-0" modular block retaining wall - elevation9 scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" cip conc. seat ring - plan1 scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" cip conc. seat ring - elevation2 scale: 1/2" = 1'-0" sand-blasted lettering3 scale: 1/2" = 1'-0" cip conc. seat ring typ.4 scale: 1/2" = 1'-0" modular block retaining wall section typ.11 scale: 1/2" = 1'-0" site bench typ.5 scale: 1/2" = 1'-0" site bench typ.6 scale: 1/2" = 1'-0" 4' ornamental fence typ.12 scale: 1/2" = 1'-0" ornamental fence gate typ.13 scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" west reading terrace enlargement plan8 scale: 1/2" = 1'-0" modular block retaining wall - elevation10 160 SF STAIR15 SF LOCKERS 298 SF FACILITIES STORAGE / WATER 279 SF AMH 1463 SF LARGE MEETING ROOM Department Legend CIRCULATION COLLECTIONS COMMUNITY MECHANICAL STAFF CLOSED STAFF OPEN SUPPORT MAIN ENTRANCE 122 SF FURNITURE STORAGE 126 SF VESTIBULE 201 SF SHARED STAFF 129 SF STAFF ENTRY 212 SF PATRON SERVICE 2595 SF CHILDREN'S COLLECTION/ SEATING 1015 SF TEEN COLLECTION 339 SF TEEN GAMING 2117 SF ADULT FICTION 712 SF LEARNING LAB 1937 SF ADULT NON FICTION 376 SF QUIET STUDY HUB 91 SF STUDY ROOM 92 SF STUDY ROOM 96 SF STUDY ROOM 96 SF STUDY ROOM 174 SF STUDY ROOM 110 SF STUDY ROOM 64 SF JAN 56 SF STAFF RR 1034 SF STAFF WORKROOM 428 SF TECHNOLOGY 268 SF BREAKROOM 2298 SF COMMONS 83 SF WELLNESS 540 SF UTILITY YARD GA L L E R Y / D I S P L A Y PRINTING 86 SF PROGRAM STORAGE 102 SF OFFICE 69 SF STORAGE 86 SF STORAGE DISPLAY/ FOOD PANTRY ST O R A G E 103 SF GARBAGE TO SOUTH CHILDERN'S READING AREANEWEXISTING EX I S T I N G NE W EX I S T I N G NEWEXISTING MAIN STAFF ENTRANCE TO WEST READING TERRACE 57 SF RR 57 SF RR 57 SF RR 56 SF RR 56 SF RR 268 SF HALLWAY 567 SF CIRC. WORKROOM 87 SF STORAGE ENTRY PLAZA 127 SF FAMILY RR 111 SF OFFICE A 2 3 4 5 6 B C D E 1 PROJECT CLIENT ARCHITECT Alliiance 400 Clifton Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55403 612.874.4100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER Meyer Borgman Johnson 801 Nicollet Mall Suite W2000 Minneapoils, MN 55402 612.338.0713 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING ENGINEERS Emanuelson-Podas, Inc. 7705 Bush Lake Rd Edina, MN 55439 952.930.0050 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Aune Fernandez Landscape Architects 755 Prior Ave N #104 St. Paul, MN 55104 661.341.3611 CIVIL ENGINEER Kimley-Horn 767 N Eustic St #100 St. Paul, MN 55114 651.645.4197 ISSUED FOR DATE Copyright Alliiance PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION COMMISSION NO 7/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 1 : 4 0 : 5 0 P M Washington County Park Grove Library 2025 2025029 FL O O R P L A N a1 . 0 1 1/8" = 1'-0"1D SCHEMATIC LEVEL 1 PLAN DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 07/25/2025 PLANNING SUBMISSION 07/30/2025 130 SF STAIR 1245 SF MECH OPEN TO BELOW OPEN TO BELOW ROOF EX I S T I N G R O O F 51 SF IT ROOM 139 SF BOILER ROOM A 2 3 4 5 6 B C D E 1 PROJECT CLIENT ARCHITECT Alliiance 400 Clifton Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55403 612.874.4100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER Meyer Borgman Johnson 801 Nicollet Mall Suite W2000 Minneapoils, MN 55402 612.338.0713 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING ENGINEERS Emanuelson-Podas, Inc. 7705 Bush Lake Rd Edina, MN 55439 952.930.0050 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Aune Fernandez Landscape Architects 755 Prior Ave N #104 St. Paul, MN 55104 661.341.3611 CIVIL ENGINEER Kimley-Horn 767 N Eustic St #100 St. Paul, MN 55114 651.645.4197 ISSUED FOR DATE Copyright Alliiance PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION COMMISSION NO 7/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 1 : 4 0 : 5 4 P M Washington County Park Grove Library 2025 2025029 FL O O R P L A N a1 . 0 2 1/8" = 1'-0"1D LEVEL 2 PLAN COLOR Copy 1 LEVEL 1EL 100' - 0" LEVEL 2EL 113' - 6" CLASS 1: CLAY FACED FIRED BRICK PROPOSED SIGNAGE LOCATION: 29.25 SFCLASS 3: ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANELS CLASS 1: TRANSPARENT GLASS CLASS 3: ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANELS OV E R A L L B U I L D I N G H E I G H T 29 ' - 1 0 " LEVEL 1EL 100' - 0" LEVEL 2EL 113' - 6" EXISTING ADDITION CLASS 3: ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANELS CLASS 1: CLAY FACED FIRED BRICK CLASS 1: TRANSPARENT GLASS CLASS 3: ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANELSCLASS 4: EXISTING STEEL SIDING CLASS 1: EXISTING CLAY FACED FIRED BRICK LEVEL 1EL 100' - 0" LEVEL 2EL 113' - 6" EXISTING EXISTINGADDITION CLASS 4: EXISTING STEEL SIDINGCLASS 1: EXISTING CLAY FACED FIRED BRICK CLASS 1: CLAY FACED FIRED BRICK CLASS 1: TRANSPARENT GLASS A 2 3 4 5 6 B C D E 1 PROJECT CLIENT ARCHITECT Alliiance 400 Clifton Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55403 612.874.4100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER Meyer Borgman Johnson 801 Nicollet Mall Suite W2000 Minneapoils, MN 55402 612.338.0713 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING ENGINEERS Emanuelson-Podas, Inc. 7705 Bush Lake Rd Edina, MN 55439 952.930.0050 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Aune Fernandez Landscape Architects 755 Prior Ave N #104 St. Paul, MN 55104 661.341.3611 CIVIL ENGINEER Kimley-Horn 767 N Eustic St #100 St. Paul, MN 55114 651.645.4197 ISSUED FOR DATE Copyright Alliiance PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION COMMISSION NO 7/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 1 : 4 1 : 0 7 P M Washington County Park Grove Library 2025 2025029 EX T E R I O R E L E V A T I O N S a3 . 0 2 City of Cottage Grove Material Requirements 11-3-11: Architectural Design Standards Non Residential Building (3) Different Class 1 Materials Minimum of 65% Class 1 or 2 Materials No more than 10% Class 4 Materials Class 1 Materials: Belden Ebony Black Smooth (Fired Clay Faced Brick) Transparent Glass Existing Fired Clay Faced Brick Class 2 Materials: N/A Class 3 Materials: Architectural Metal Panels Class 4 Materials: Steel Siding Material Percentage Break Down Class 1 Materials 8165 sf / 10,392 sf = 79% Class 2 Materials 0 sf / 10,392 sf =0% Class 3 Materials 2116 sf / 10,392 sf = 20% Class 4 Materials 110 sf / 10392 sf = 1% Material Narrative The primary façade material for the addition and main entry is a Fired Clay Faced Brick, Ebony Black Smooth by Belden. This dark brown-black brick contrasts the existing brick on the remainder of the building, breaking up the original monolithic facade and signals to patrons that this is a significant re- imagining of the original library. Special brick detailing with corbelling patterns adds pattern and interest to the walls near the entry. The secondary facade material is an architectural metal panel, Anodized Diamond Tile by Millennium Forms. The small scale and installation pattern of the metal tile on the façade creates a playful, welcoming civic building. Three colors will be installed to create a gradient effect across the building, blending from a darker to lighter neutral color. This gradient symbolizes water and reflects the natural environment that is present in Cottage Grove. Areas where multiple materials come together have been carefully considered to highlight the differences. We are inspired by the idea of 'The Confluence', similar to the nearby confluence of the St. Croix and Mississippi River. At the south and west sides of the building, brick patterning recalls the detailed brick patterns of the existing building in a new, modern way. The remainder of the facade is dedicated to bird safe Transparent Glass, providing patrons with views and connections both into the library and to the landscape around the library. 1/8" = 1'-0"1C EXTERIOR ELEVATION - EAST 1/8" = 1'-0"1B EXTERIOR ELEVATION - SOUTH 1/8" = 1'-0"1D EXTERIOR ELEVATION - WEST 1/8" = 1'-0"1A EXTERIOR ELEVATION - NORTH DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 07/25/2025 PLANNING SUBMISSION 07/30/2025 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.10.10.10.10.20.30.40.50.50.40.30.20.10.10.10.10.10.10.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.4 2.1 2.2 1.6 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.5 2.6 1.9 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.5 2.1 2.6 2.7 2.3 1.7 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.6 1.9 2.2 2.5 3.0 3.7 3.8 3.7 3.0 2.5 2.2 1.9 1.6 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.7 2.2 2.6 2.7 2.4 1.9 1.5 1.2 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.1 1.4 1.7 2.0 2.4 2.7 3.2 3.7 4.3 4.5 4.3 3.8 3.2 2.7 2.4 2.1 1.7 1.4 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.7 2.1 2.4 2.4 2.2 1.9 1.6 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.9 2.3 2.8 3.2 3.6 4.2 4.7 4.8 4.7 4.2 3.7 3.2 2.8 2.3 1.9 1.6 1.2 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.7 1.0 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.9 3.4 3.9 4.5 4.8 4.8 4.9 4.6 4.0 3.4 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.6 1.3 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.9 2.4 2.9 3.3 3.7 4.2 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.3 3.7 3.3 2.9 2.4 2.0 1.6 1.2 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.5 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.1 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.6 2.1 2.5 2.9 3.1 3.6 4.3 4.3 3.7 3.1 2.9 2.6 2.1 1.7 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.8 1.7 3.1 3.6 2.7 2.1 2.5 3.7 4.1 3.1 2.4 2.8 3.8 4.2 3.2 2.5 3.0 4.2 4.9 4.8 4.4 3.0 1.9 2.0 3.5 4.8 3.5 1.7 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.4 1.7 2.0 2.3 2.4 2.9 3.9 4.0 3.0 2.4 2.3 2.0 1.7 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.0 3.0 7.2 8.7 4.9 2.7 3.8 7.7 9.0 5.2 2.9 3.9 7.8 9.1 5.2 3.1 4.5 8.8 10.6 10.1 10.3 6.0 2.6 2.5 5.2 8.2 5.4 2.2 0.9 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.6 1.9 2.1 2.5 3.1 4.2 4.3 3.2 2.5 2.2 1.9 1.6 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.9 3.0 8.9 11.4 5.1 2.5 3.6 9.1 11.6 5.2 2.5 3.7 9.2 11.7 5.2 2.7 4.3 12.8 11.1 6.4 2.4 2.4 6.3 6.7 2.1 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.5 3.0 3.7 4.1 3.8 3.1 2.5 2.1 1.8 1.5 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 5.5 2.0 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.7 1.9 2.2 2.6 3.1 3.3 3.1 2.7 2.3 1.9 1.7 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 0.9 0.8 18.6 6.7 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.0 2.4 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.4 2.1 1.8 1.5 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.6 1.8 3.2 3.3 6.0 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.8 3.4 7.3 9.9 20.9 4.7 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.9 3.6 7.8 10.6 21.3 4.1 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.7 2.3 4.0 4.1 19.9 4.0 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.7 1.8 2.5 2.3 3.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.8 2.6 4.7 5.2 20.5 2.9 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.9 3.8 8.2 21.0 2.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.8 3.1 6.4 8.2 16.5 2.0 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.6 1.6 2.6 2.6 1.0 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.0 0.8 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.9 1.1 1.0 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.6 1.9 3.2 3.3 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.8 3.4 7.2 9.6 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.8 3.5 7.7 10.7 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.1 1.8 1.6 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.6 2.0 3.6 3.9 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.9 2.3 2.7 2.9 2.7 2.3 1.9 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.8 1.1 1.0 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.7 2.1 2.6 3.1 3.3 3.2 2.6 2.1 1.7 1.5 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 9.4 11.5 4.6 1.9 3.1 8.9 11.4 4.6 1.9 3.1 8.9 11.4 4.6 2.0 3.7 10.7 4.5 4.6 9.6 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.7 2.0 2.5 3.4 3.5 2.6 2.0 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.8 2.8 6.8 8.1 4.3 2.1 3.1 6.9 8.1 4.3 2.1 3.1 6.9 8.1 4.3 2.2 3.6 7.5 7.8 4.2 3.6 5.7 6.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.8 1.9 2.4 3.4 3.5 2.5 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.6 1.6 3.2 3.7 2.4 1.5 2.0 3.3 3.7 2.4 1.5 2.0 3.3 3.7 2.5 1.6 2.2 3.5 3.6 2.4 2.0 2.1 1.9 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.1 1.3 1.6 1.9 2.2 2.5 3.0 3.7 3.8 3.7 3.1 2.6 2.3 1.9 1.6 1.3 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.8 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.2 2.6 3.0 3.4 3.7 3.8 3.8 3.5 3.0 2.6 2.2 1.9 1.6 1.3 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.6 2.0 2.3 2.8 3.3 3.8 4.1 4.2 4.1 3.8 3.3 2.8 2.4 2.0 1.7 1.4 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.4 1.7 2.0 2.4 2.9 3.4 3.9 4.3 4.5 4.3 3.9 3.4 2.9 2.5 2.1 1.7 1.4 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.7 4.1 4.2 4.1 3.7 3.3 2.8 2.4 2.0 1.7 1.3 1.0 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.5 2.9 3.3 3.7 3.9 3.7 3.3 2.9 2.5 2.2 1.8 1.5 1.2 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.0 2.4 2.9 3.4 3.7 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.1 1.8 1.6 1.3 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.9 2.3 3.1 3.2 3.1 2.4 1.9 1.7 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.3 2.0 2.5 2.1 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 Calculation Summary Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min East Property Line Illuminance Fc 0.25 0.4 0.1 2.50 4.00 Main Lot Illuminance Fc 1.16 21.3 0.0 N.A. N.A. North Property Line Illuminance Fc 0.08 0.2 0.0 N.A. N.A. South Property Line Illuminance Fc 0.09 0.5 0.0 N.A. N.A. Street & Sidewalk Illuminance Fc 0.06 0.2 0.0 N.A. N.A. West Property Line Illuminance Fc 0.00 0.0 0.0 N.A. N.A. Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Description Tag LLF Luminaire Lumens Luminaire Watts Total Watts 14 WDGE2 LED P3 30K 80CRI VW WDGE2 LED P3 30K 80CRI VW W 0.855 3094 22.55 315.7 7 EVO6 35_15 AR MD LS EVO6 35_15 AR MD LS 0.855 1517 14.7 102.9 5 DSX1 LED P3 30K 80CRI T4M HS DSX1 LED P3 30K 80CRI T4M HS P1 0.855 10466 102.1727 510.863 1 DSX1 LED P3 30K 80CRI T2M DSX1 LED P3 30K 80CRI T2M P2 0.855 11850 102.17 102.17 1 DSX1 LED P3 30K 80CRI T3M HS DSX1 LED P3 30K 80CRI T3M HS P3 0.855 10391 102.1727 102.173 ST S P1 P1 P2 P1 P1 P3 P1 WWWWW W W W W W W W W W B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 B2 A 2 3 4 5 6 B C D E 1 PROJECT CLIENT SH E E T ISSUED FOR DATE Copyright Alliiance NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION COMMISSION NO ARCHITECT Alliiance 400 Clifton Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55403 612.874.4100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER Meyer Borgman Johnson 801 Nicollet Mall, Suite W2000 Minneapoils, MN 55402 612.338.0713 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING ENGINEERS Emanuelson-Podas, Inc. 7705 Bush Lake Rd Edina, MN 55439 952.930.0050 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Aune Fernandez Landscape Architects 755 Prior Ave N #104 St. Paul, MN 55104 661.341.3611 CIVIL ENGINEER Kimley-Horn 767 N Eustic St #100 St. Paul, MN 55114 651.645.4197 PRELIMINARY Washington County Park Grove Library sp 0 . 0 1 EL E C T R I C A L S I T E P H O T O M E T R I C PL A N 2024 5175.0000 SCALE:1" = 20'-0" ELECTRICAL SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN1 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 07/25/2025 PLANNING SUBMISSION 07/30/2025 A 2 3 4 5 6 B C D E 1 PROJECT CLIENT SH E E T ISSUED FOR DATE Copyright Alliiance NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION COMMISSION NO ARCHITECT Alliiance 400 Clifton Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55403 612.874.4100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER Meyer Borgman Johnson 801 Nicollet Mall, Suite W2000 Minneapoils, MN 55402 612.338.0713 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING ENGINEERS Emanuelson-Podas, Inc. 7705 Bush Lake Rd Edina, MN 55439 952.930.0050 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Aune Fernandez Landscape Architects 755 Prior Ave N #104 St. Paul, MN 55104 661.341.3611 CIVIL ENGINEER Kimley-Horn 767 N Eustic St #100 St. Paul, MN 55114 651.645.4197 PRELIMINARY Washington County Park Grove Library sp 0 . 0 2 EL E C T R I C A L S I T E L I G H T I N G CU T S H E E T S 2024 5175.0000 P1, P2, P3 W B2 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 07/25/2025 PLANNING SUBMISSION 07/30/2025 Stormwater Management Plan PARK GROVE LIBRARY WASHINGTON COUNTY, MN City of Cottage Grove, MN Prepared for: Alliiance Prepared by: Kimley-Horn 767 Eustis Street, Suite 100 St. Paul, MN 55114 Contact: Dan Elenbaas Prepared On: August 4, 2025 Park Grove Library - Stormwater Report Page 2 Cottage Grove, MN Stormwater Management Report for Park Grove Library Prepared for: Alliiance August 4, 2025 Prepared By: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 767 Eustis Street, Suite 100 St. Paul, MN 55114 . I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. _______________________________________ Daniel L Elenbaas Date: 08/04/2025 Registration No. 44614 Park Grove Library - Stormwater Report Page 3 Cottage Grove, MN Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................... 4 2.0 Pre-development Conditions ................................................................... 4 3.0 Post-development Conditions ................................................................. 4 4.0 Rate Attenuation Summary ..................................................................... 4 5.0 Water Quality Summary ......................................................................... 5 Exhibits ........................................................................................................... 6 Exhibit 1. Existing Drainage Exhibit................................................................................................... 7 Exhibit 2. Proposed Drainage Exhibit ................................................................................................ 8 Appendices ..................................................................................................... 9 Appendix 1. Pre-Development HydroCAD Model Analysis .............................................................. 10 Appendix 2. Post-Development HydroCAD Model Analysis ............................................................. 11 Appendix 3. Geotechnical Report ................................................................................................... 12 Appendix 4. Grading and Drainage Plan and Drainage Details......................................................... 13 Park Grove Library - Stormwater Report Page 4 Cottage Grove, MN 1.0 Introduction Washington County is proposing to redevelop an existing library site located at 7900 Hemingway Avenue South in Cottage Grove, MN. The existing site has a parking lot with one way circulation and no stormwater treatment on site. The parking lot will be replaced and a portion of the building will be replaced with a flat roof. The adjacent properties consist of residential apartments. The total drainage study area consists of 2.538 acres. HydroCAD 10.2 and NOAA Atlas 14 runoff depths were used to analyze existing and proposed stormwater conditions of the redeveloped site. The proposed development has been evaluated to meet or exceed the guidelines set forth by the City of Cottage Grove, South Washington Watershed District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), and the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). 2.0 Pre-development Conditions The existing roof is sloped with no gutters or downspouts and runoff travels over the vegetated lawn. The existing parking lot sheet drains to a catch basin or to the city street. A summary of the pervious and impervious coverage for existing conditions is included below: • Total project area = 2.538 acres o Existing Pervious Area = 1.222 acres (48.1%) o Existing Impervious Area = 1.316 acres (51.9%) o Weighted Curve Number (CN) = 86.6 3.0 Post-development Conditions The developed site drainage will collect the new roof stormwater through an internal drain routed to the perforated Nyloplast structure that will migrate to the storage stone and infiltrate into the natural soils. The parking lot will drain to the east where the row of parking will contain PaveDrain blocks that allow the stormwater to enter the storage stone through the joints. A summary of the pervious and impervious coverage for proposed conditions is included below. • Total project area = 2.538 acres • Disturbed area = 1.85 acres o Proposed Pervious Area = 1.225 acres (48.3%) o Proposed Impervious Area = 1.313 acres (51.7%) o Weighted Curve Number (CN) = 83.0 4.0 Rate Attenuation Summary An analysis was completed to ensure peak runoff rates were not increasing in the 2-, 10-, and 100-year 24-hour storm events for the discharge location on the site. The discharge location is an existing storm Park Grove Library - Stormwater Report Page 5 Cottage Grove, MN sewer system located in the southeast corner of the parking lot. The outfall from the BMP will enter into the existing inlet or the new 12” pipe from the underground stone storage. The proposed development achieves this requirement as outlined in the table below. Table 1: Rate Attenuation 5.0 Water Quality Summary The soils on site are predominantly poorly graded sand (SP) and no water or confining layer were encountered to the depth of all the borings performed. Infiltration is the ideal solution to meet the water quality requirements. The area is located near the groundwater DWSMA with high vulnerability and within the Cottage Grove wellhead protection area. However, the site is outside of an emergency response area. The Minnesota Stormwater Manual’s wellhead flowchart leads to a higher level of review required. Under condition 2 a geologic assessment is not necessary. The city wells are located more than ½ mile away from the site. The PaveDrain system is designed to infiltrate the runoff from a 1.1” event over the tributary impervious area. The proposed impervious area is calculated to be 0.77 acres of the total contributing drainage area of 1.146 acres which creates a water quality volume of 3,050 CF. The proposed weir set at 874.94’ achieves 3,060 CF of infiltration before overtopping begins and the 12” pipe governs for rate control. 2 Year ( 2.79 in.) 10 Year ( 4.15 in.) 100 Year ( 7.40 in.) Pre-Development Rate (CFS) 5.57 10.43 22.75 Post-Development Rate (CFS) 1.72 8.10 20.38 Park Grove Library - Stormwater Report Page 6 Cottage Grove, MN Exhibits Park Grove Library - Stormwater Report Page 7 Cottage Grove, MN Exhibit 1. Existing Drainage Exhibit V-DA-1 V-DA-2 V-DA-3 86 5 87 0 875 880 88 0 88 0 86 6 86 7 86 8 86 9 87 1 87 2 873 874 87 6 87 6 87 7 877 877 87 8 87 8 878 878 878 87 9 879 87 9 87 9 879 881 881 88 1 881 882 882 88 3 88 3 A 2 3 4 5 6 B C D E 1 PROJECT CLIENT ARCHITECT Alliiance 400 Clifton Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55403 612.874.4100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER Meyer Borgman Johnson 801 Nicollet Mall Suite W2000 Minneapoils, MN 55402 612.338.0713 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING ENGINEERS Emanuelson-Podas, Inc. 7705 Bush Lake Rd Edina, MN 55439 952.930.0050 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Aune Fernandez Landscape Architects 755 Prior Ave N #104 St. Paul, MN 55104 661.341.3611 CIVIL ENGINEER Kimley-Horn 767 N Eustis St #100 St. Paul, MN 55114 651.645.4197 ISSUED FOR DATE Copyright Alliiance PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION COMMISSION NO Washington County Park Grove Library DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 07/25/2025 PLANNING SUBMISSION 07/30/2025 LEGEND PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CONTOUR TIME OF CONCENTRATION PATH EXISTING DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY 175 Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call NORTH EX I S T I N G D R A I N A G E E X H I B I T Park Grove Library - Stormwater Report Page 8 Cottage Grove, MN Exhibit 2. Proposed Drainage Exhibit HE M I N G W A Y A V E N U E S O U T H SHARED COORDINATE GRIDLINES A/6 EXISTING BUILDING ±21,181 SF FFE: 880.00 PROPOSED BUILDING ±20,355 SF 878 879 876 877 878 879 880 877877 87887 9 881882 882 883 883 884 884 87 6 87 6 87 6 87 7 87 8 87 9 87 6 87 6 87 6 87 7 87 8 87 9 87 5 87 487 687787 8 87 5 880 87 4 87 487 6 87 7 87 8879 875 880 872 873 874 876 877 878 879 86 5 87086 6 86 7 86 8 86 9 871 87 0 87 5 88 0 86 9 87 1 87 2 87 3 87 4 87 6 87 7 87 8 87 9 86 5 870 87 5 880 863 864 86 6 86 7 86 8 869 871 872 873 874 87 6 877 87 8 879 880 876 877 878 879 881 882 883 870 87 5 88 0 86 9 87 1 87 2 87 3 87 4 87 6 87 7 87 8 87 9 88 1 88 2 88 3 87 5 87 3 87 4 87 687 7 878 87 8 87 8 87 9 88 0 87 9 87 9 87 9 87 5 87 4 87 4 87 6 87 7 87 8 879 DA-1 DA-2 DA-3 CO A 2 3 4 5 6 B C D E 1 PROJECT CLIENT ARCHITECT Alliiance 400 Clifton Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55403 612.874.4100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER Meyer Borgman Johnson 801 Nicollet Mall Suite W2000 Minneapoils, MN 55402 612.338.0713 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING ENGINEERS Emanuelson-Podas, Inc. 7705 Bush Lake Rd Edina, MN 55439 952.930.0050 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Aune Fernandez Landscape Architects 755 Prior Ave N #104 St. Paul, MN 55104 661.341.3611 CIVIL ENGINEER Kimley-Horn 767 N Eustis St #100 St. Paul, MN 55114 651.645.4197 ISSUED FOR DATE Copyright Alliiance PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION COMMISSION NO Washington County Park Grove Library DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 07/25/2025 PLANNING SUBMISSION 07/30/2025 LEGEND PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR175 TIME OF CONCENTRATION PATH PROPOSED BASIN BOUNDARY PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING) D PROPOSED STORM SEWER 175 Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call R NORTH PR O P O S E D D R A I N A G E E X H I B I T Park Grove Library - Stormwater Report Page 9 Cottage Grove, MN Appendices Park Grove Library - Stormwater Report Page 10 Cottage Grove, MN Appendix 1. Pre-Development HydroCAD Model Analysis V-DA-1 to Hemingway V-DA-2 to Catch Basin V-DA-3 to Neighbor 1R Hemingway 2R Catch Basin 3R Neighbor EX (new Reach) Routing Diagram for PGL Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates, Printed 8/4/2025 HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Subcat Reach Pond Link PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 2HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Rainfall Events Listing Event# Event Name Storm Type Curve Mode Duration (hours) B/B Depth (inches) AMC 1 2-year MSE 24-hr 3 Default 24.00 1 2.79 2 2 10-year MSE 24-hr 3 Default 24.00 1 4.15 2 3 100-year MSE 24-hr 3 Default 24.00 1 7.40 2 PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 3HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Area Listing (selected nodes) Area (acres) CN Description (subcatchment-numbers) 0.271 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A (V-DA-1) 0.072 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B (V-DA-2) 0.879 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C (V-DA-3) 0.419 98 Paved parking, HSG A (V-DA-1) 0.384 98 Paved parking, HSG B (V-DA-2) 0.200 98 Roofs, HSG A (V-DA-1) 0.105 98 Roofs, HSG B (V-DA-2) 0.181 98 Roofs, HSG C (V-DA-3) 0.027 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C (V-DA-3) 2.538 82 TOTAL AREA PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 4HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Soil Listing (selected nodes) Area (acres) Soil Group Subcatchment Numbers 0.890 HSG A V-DA-1 0.561 HSG B V-DA-2 1.087 HSG C V-DA-3 0.000 HSG D 0.000 Other 2.538 TOTAL AREA PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 5HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Ground Covers (selected nodes) HSG-A (acres) HSG-B (acres) HSG-C (acres) HSG-D (acres) Other (acres) Total (acres) Ground Cover Subcatchment Numbers 0.271 0.072 0.879 0.000 0.000 1.222 >75% Grass cover, Good V-DA-1, V-DA-2, V-DA-3 0.419 0.384 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.803 Paved parking V-DA-1, V-DA-2 0.200 0.105 0.181 0.000 0.000 0.486 Roofs V-DA-1, V-DA-2, V-DA-3 0.000 0.000 0.027 0.000 0.000 0.027 Unconnected pavement V-DA-3 0.890 0.561 1.087 0.000 0.000 2.538 TOTAL AREA MSE 24-hr 3 2-year Rainfall=2.79"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 6HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-48.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 4801 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Runoff Area=38,765 sf 69.56% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.09"Subcatchment V-DA-1: to Hemingway Tc=7.0 min CN=80 Runoff=1.73 cfs 0.081 af Runoff Area=24,452 sf 87.16% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.05"Subcatchment V-DA-2: to Catch Basin Tc=7.0 min CN=93 Runoff=1.96 cfs 0.096 af Runoff Area=47,353 sf 19.13% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.98"Subcatchment V-DA-3: to Neighbor Tc=7.0 min UI Adjusted CN=78 Runoff=1.88 cfs 0.089 af Inflow=1.73 cfs 0.081 afReach 1R: Hemingway Outflow=1.73 cfs 0.081 af Inflow=1.96 cfs 0.096 afReach 2R: Catch Basin Outflow=1.96 cfs 0.096 af Inflow=1.88 cfs 0.089 afReach 3R: Neighbor Outflow=1.88 cfs 0.089 af Inflow=5.57 cfs 0.266 afReach EX: (new Reach) Outflow=5.57 cfs 0.266 af Total Runoff Area = 2.538 ac Runoff Volume = 0.266 af Average Runoff Depth = 1.26" 48.15% Pervious = 1.222 ac 51.85% Impervious = 1.316 ac MSE 24-hr 3 2-year Rainfall=2.79"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 7HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment V-DA-1: to Hemingway Runoff = 1.73 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.081 af, Depth= 1.09" Routed to Reach 1R : Hemingway Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2-year Rainfall=2.79" Area (sf) CN Description 11,800 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 8,729 98 Roofs, HSG A 18,236 98 Paved parking, HSG A 38,765 80 Weighted Average 11,800 30.44% Pervious Area 26,965 69.56% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment V-DA-1: to Hemingway Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 2-year Rainfall=2.79" Runoff Area=38,765 sf Runoff Volume=0.081 af Runoff Depth=1.09" Tc=7.0 min CN=80 1.73 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 2-year Rainfall=2.79"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 8HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment V-DA-2: to Catch Basin Runoff = 1.96 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.096 af, Depth= 2.05" Routed to Reach 2R : Catch Basin Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2-year Rainfall=2.79" Area (sf) CN Description 3,140 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 4,578 98 Roofs, HSG B 16,734 98 Paved parking, HSG B 24,452 93 Weighted Average 3,140 12.84% Pervious Area 21,312 87.16% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment V-DA-2: to Catch Basin Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 2-year Rainfall=2.79" Runoff Area=24,452 sf Runoff Volume=0.096 af Runoff Depth=2.05" Tc=7.0 min CN=93 1.96 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 2-year Rainfall=2.79"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 9HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment V-DA-3: to Neighbor Runoff = 1.88 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.089 af, Depth= 0.98" Routed to Reach 3R : Neighbor Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2-year Rainfall=2.79" Area (sf) CN Adj Description 38,296 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 7,875 98 Roofs, HSG C 1,182 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C 47,353 79 78 Weighted Average, UI Adjusted 38,296 80.87% Pervious Area 9,057 19.13% Impervious Area 1,182 13.05% Unconnected Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment V-DA-3: to Neighbor Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 2-year Rainfall=2.79" Runoff Area=47,353 sf Runoff Volume=0.089 af Runoff Depth=0.98" Tc=7.0 min UI Adjusted CN=78 1.88 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 2-year Rainfall=2.79"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 10HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 1R: Hemingway [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.890 ac, 69.56% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.09" for 2-year event Inflow = 1.73 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.081 af Outflow = 1.73 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.081 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach EX : (new Reach) Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 1R: Hemingway Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 1 0 Inflow Area=0.890 ac 1.73 cfs 1.73 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 2-year Rainfall=2.79"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 11HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 2R: Catch Basin [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.561 ac, 87.16% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.05" for 2-year event Inflow = 1.96 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.096 af Outflow = 1.96 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.096 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach EX : (new Reach) Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 2R: Catch Basin Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 2 1 0 Inflow Area=0.561 ac 1.96 cfs 1.96 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 2-year Rainfall=2.79"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 12HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 3R: Neighbor [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 1.087 ac, 19.13% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.98" for 2-year event Inflow = 1.88 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.089 af Outflow = 1.88 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.089 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach EX : (new Reach) Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 3R: Neighbor Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 2 1 0 Inflow Area=1.087 ac 1.88 cfs 1.88 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 2-year Rainfall=2.79"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 13HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach EX: (new Reach) [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 2.538 ac, 51.85% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.26" for 2-year event Inflow = 5.57 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.266 af Outflow = 5.57 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.266 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach EX: (new Reach) Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=2.538 ac 5.57 cfs 5.57 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 10-year Rainfall=4.15"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 14HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-48.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 4801 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Runoff Area=38,765 sf 69.56% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.17"Subcatchment V-DA-1: to Hemingway Tc=7.0 min CN=80 Runoff=3.43 cfs 0.161 af Runoff Area=24,452 sf 87.16% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.37"Subcatchment V-DA-2: to Catch Basin Tc=7.0 min CN=93 Runoff=3.11 cfs 0.157 af Runoff Area=47,353 sf 19.13% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.01"Subcatchment V-DA-3: to Neighbor Tc=7.0 min UI Adjusted CN=78 Runoff=3.89 cfs 0.182 af Inflow=3.43 cfs 0.161 afReach 1R: Hemingway Outflow=3.43 cfs 0.161 af Inflow=3.11 cfs 0.157 afReach 2R: Catch Basin Outflow=3.11 cfs 0.157 af Inflow=3.89 cfs 0.182 afReach 3R: Neighbor Outflow=3.89 cfs 0.182 af Inflow=10.43 cfs 0.500 afReach EX: (new Reach) Outflow=10.43 cfs 0.500 af Total Runoff Area = 2.538 ac Runoff Volume = 0.500 af Average Runoff Depth = 2.36" 48.15% Pervious = 1.222 ac 51.85% Impervious = 1.316 ac MSE 24-hr 3 10-year Rainfall=4.15"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 15HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment V-DA-1: to Hemingway Runoff = 3.43 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.161 af, Depth= 2.17" Routed to Reach 1R : Hemingway Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-year Rainfall=4.15" Area (sf) CN Description 11,800 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 8,729 98 Roofs, HSG A 18,236 98 Paved parking, HSG A 38,765 80 Weighted Average 11,800 30.44% Pervious Area 26,965 69.56% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment V-DA-1: to Hemingway Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 10-year Rainfall=4.15" Runoff Area=38,765 sf Runoff Volume=0.161 af Runoff Depth=2.17" Tc=7.0 min CN=80 3.43 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 10-year Rainfall=4.15"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 16HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment V-DA-2: to Catch Basin Runoff = 3.11 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.157 af, Depth= 3.37" Routed to Reach 2R : Catch Basin Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-year Rainfall=4.15" Area (sf) CN Description 3,140 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 4,578 98 Roofs, HSG B 16,734 98 Paved parking, HSG B 24,452 93 Weighted Average 3,140 12.84% Pervious Area 21,312 87.16% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment V-DA-2: to Catch Basin Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 10-year Rainfall=4.15" Runoff Area=24,452 sf Runoff Volume=0.157 af Runoff Depth=3.37" Tc=7.0 min CN=93 3.11 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 10-year Rainfall=4.15"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 17HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment V-DA-3: to Neighbor Runoff = 3.89 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.182 af, Depth= 2.01" Routed to Reach 3R : Neighbor Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-year Rainfall=4.15" Area (sf) CN Adj Description 38,296 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 7,875 98 Roofs, HSG C 1,182 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C 47,353 79 78 Weighted Average, UI Adjusted 38,296 80.87% Pervious Area 9,057 19.13% Impervious Area 1,182 13.05% Unconnected Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment V-DA-3: to Neighbor Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 10-year Rainfall=4.15" Runoff Area=47,353 sf Runoff Volume=0.182 af Runoff Depth=2.01" Tc=7.0 min UI Adjusted CN=78 3.89 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 10-year Rainfall=4.15"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 18HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 1R: Hemingway [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.890 ac, 69.56% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.17" for 10-year event Inflow = 3.43 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.161 af Outflow = 3.43 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.161 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach EX : (new Reach) Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 1R: Hemingway Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=0.890 ac 3.43 cfs 3.43 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 10-year Rainfall=4.15"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 19HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 2R: Catch Basin [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.561 ac, 87.16% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.37" for 10-year event Inflow = 3.11 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.157 af Outflow = 3.11 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.157 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach EX : (new Reach) Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 2R: Catch Basin Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=0.561 ac 3.11 cfs 3.11 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 10-year Rainfall=4.15"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 20HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 3R: Neighbor [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 1.087 ac, 19.13% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.01" for 10-year event Inflow = 3.89 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.182 af Outflow = 3.89 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.182 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach EX : (new Reach) Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 3R: Neighbor Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=1.087 ac 3.89 cfs 3.89 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 10-year Rainfall=4.15"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 21HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach EX: (new Reach) [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 2.538 ac, 51.85% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.36" for 10-year event Inflow = 10.43 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.500 af Outflow = 10.43 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.500 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach EX: (new Reach) Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=2.538 ac 10.43 cfs 10.43 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 100-year Rainfall=7.40"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 22HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-48.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 4801 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Runoff Area=38,765 sf 69.56% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.06"Subcatchment V-DA-1: to Hemingway Tc=7.0 min CN=80 Runoff=7.78 cfs 0.376 af Runoff Area=24,452 sf 87.16% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.57"Subcatchment V-DA-2: to Catch Basin Tc=7.0 min CN=93 Runoff=5.82 cfs 0.307 af Runoff Area=47,353 sf 19.13% Impervious Runoff Depth=4.84"Subcatchment V-DA-3: to Neighbor Tc=7.0 min UI Adjusted CN=78 Runoff=9.15 cfs 0.438 af Inflow=7.78 cfs 0.376 afReach 1R: Hemingway Outflow=7.78 cfs 0.376 af Inflow=5.82 cfs 0.307 afReach 2R: Catch Basin Outflow=5.82 cfs 0.307 af Inflow=9.15 cfs 0.438 afReach 3R: Neighbor Outflow=9.15 cfs 0.438 af Inflow=22.75 cfs 1.121 afReach EX: (new Reach) Outflow=22.75 cfs 1.121 af Total Runoff Area = 2.538 ac Runoff Volume = 1.121 af Average Runoff Depth = 5.30" 48.15% Pervious = 1.222 ac 51.85% Impervious = 1.316 ac MSE 24-hr 3 100-year Rainfall=7.40"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 23HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment V-DA-1: to Hemingway Runoff = 7.78 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.376 af, Depth= 5.06" Routed to Reach 1R : Hemingway Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-year Rainfall=7.40" Area (sf) CN Description 11,800 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 8,729 98 Roofs, HSG A 18,236 98 Paved parking, HSG A 38,765 80 Weighted Average 11,800 30.44% Pervious Area 26,965 69.56% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment V-DA-1: to Hemingway Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 100-year Rainfall=7.40" Runoff Area=38,765 sf Runoff Volume=0.376 af Runoff Depth=5.06" Tc=7.0 min CN=80 7.78 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 100-year Rainfall=7.40"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 24HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment V-DA-2: to Catch Basin Runoff = 5.82 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.307 af, Depth= 6.57" Routed to Reach 2R : Catch Basin Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-year Rainfall=7.40" Area (sf) CN Description 3,140 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 4,578 98 Roofs, HSG B 16,734 98 Paved parking, HSG B 24,452 93 Weighted Average 3,140 12.84% Pervious Area 21,312 87.16% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment V-DA-2: to Catch Basin Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 100-year Rainfall=7.40" Runoff Area=24,452 sf Runoff Volume=0.307 af Runoff Depth=6.57" Tc=7.0 min CN=93 5.82 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 100-year Rainfall=7.40"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 25HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment V-DA-3: to Neighbor Runoff = 9.15 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.438 af, Depth= 4.84" Routed to Reach 3R : Neighbor Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-year Rainfall=7.40" Area (sf) CN Adj Description 38,296 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 7,875 98 Roofs, HSG C 1,182 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C 47,353 79 78 Weighted Average, UI Adjusted 38,296 80.87% Pervious Area 9,057 19.13% Impervious Area 1,182 13.05% Unconnected Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment V-DA-3: to Neighbor Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 100-year Rainfall=7.40" Runoff Area=47,353 sf Runoff Volume=0.438 af Runoff Depth=4.84" Tc=7.0 min UI Adjusted CN=78 9.15 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 100-year Rainfall=7.40"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 26HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 1R: Hemingway [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.890 ac, 69.56% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.06" for 100-year event Inflow = 7.78 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.376 af Outflow = 7.78 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.376 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach EX : (new Reach) Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 1R: Hemingway Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=0.890 ac 7.78 cfs 7.78 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 100-year Rainfall=7.40"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 27HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 2R: Catch Basin [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.561 ac, 87.16% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 6.57" for 100-year event Inflow = 5.82 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.307 af Outflow = 5.82 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.307 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach EX : (new Reach) Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 2R: Catch Basin Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=0.561 ac 5.82 cfs 5.82 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 100-year Rainfall=7.40"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 28HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 3R: Neighbor [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 1.087 ac, 19.13% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 4.84" for 100-year event Inflow = 9.15 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.438 af Outflow = 9.15 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.438 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach EX : (new Reach) Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 3R: Neighbor Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=1.087 ac 9.15 cfs 9.15 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 100-year Rainfall=7.40"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 29HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach EX: (new Reach) [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 2.538 ac, 51.85% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.30" for 100-year event Inflow = 22.75 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 1.121 af Outflow = 22.75 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 1.121 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach EX: (new Reach) Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=2.538 ac 22.75 cfs 22.75 cfs Park Grove Library - Stormwater Report Page 11 Cottage Grove, MN Appendix 2. Post-Development HydroCAD Model Analysis DA-1 to Hemingway DA-2 to Pavers DA-3 to Neighbor 4R Hemingway 5R Catch Basin 6R Neighbor PR (new Reach) 1P (new Pond) Routing Diagram for PGL Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates, Printed 8/4/2025 HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Subcat Reach Pond Link PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 2HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Rainfall Events Listing Event# Event Name Storm Type Curve Mode Duration (hours) B/B Depth (inches) AMC 1 2-year MSE 24-hr 3 Default 24.00 1 2.79 2 2 10-year MSE 24-hr 3 Default 24.00 1 4.15 2 3 100-year MSE 24-hr 3 Default 24.00 1 7.40 2 PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 3HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Area Listing (selected nodes) Area (acres) CN Description (subcatchment-numbers) 0.229 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A (DA-1) 0.094 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B (DA-2) 0.901 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C (DA-3) 0.040 98 Paved parking, HSG A (DA-1) 1.051 98 Paved parking, HSG B (DA-2) 0.014 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C (DA-3) 0.207 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C (DA-3) 2.538 83 TOTAL AREA PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 4HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Soil Listing (selected nodes) Area (acres) Soil Group Subcatchment Numbers 0.270 HSG A DA-1 1.146 HSG B DA-2 1.123 HSG C DA-3 0.000 HSG D 0.000 Other 2.538 TOTAL AREA PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 5HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Ground Covers (selected nodes) HSG-A (acres) HSG-B (acres) HSG-C (acres) HSG-D (acres) Other (acres) Total (acres) Ground Cover Subcatchment Numbers 0.229 0.094 0.901 0.000 0.000 1.225 >75% Grass cover, Good DA-1, DA-2, DA-3 0.040 1.051 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.092 Paved parking DA-1, DA-2 0.000 0.000 0.014 0.000 0.000 0.014 Unconnected pavement DA-3 0.000 0.000 0.207 0.000 0.000 0.207 Unconnected roofs DA-3 0.270 1.146 1.123 0.000 0.000 2.538 TOTAL AREA PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 6HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pipe Listing (selected nodes) Line# Node Number In-Invert (feet) Out-Invert (feet) Length (feet) Slope (ft/ft) n Width (inches) Diam/Height (inches) Inside-Fill (inches) Node Name 1 1P 867.60 867.35 25.0 0.0100 0.015 0.0 15.0 0.0 MSE 24-hr 3 2-year Rainfall=2.79"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 7HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-48.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 4801 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Runoff Area=11,743 sf 14.88% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.03"Subcatchment DA-1: to Hemingway Tc=7.0 min CN=48 Runoff=0.00 cfs 0.001 af Runoff Area=49,918 sf 91.76% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.24"Subcatchment DA-2: to Pavers Tc=0.0 min CN=95 Runoff=4.98 cfs 0.214 af Runoff Area=48,899 sf 19.70% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.88"Subcatchment DA-3: to Neighbor Tc=7.0 min UI Adjusted CN=76 Runoff=1.72 cfs 0.082 af Inflow=0.00 cfs 0.001 afReach 4R: Hemingway Outflow=0.00 cfs 0.001 af Inflow=0.00 cfs 0.000 afReach 5R: Catch Basin Outflow=0.00 cfs 0.000 af Inflow=1.72 cfs 0.082 afReach 6R: Neighbor Outflow=1.72 cfs 0.082 af Inflow=1.72 cfs 0.083 afReach PR: (new Reach) Outflow=1.72 cfs 0.083 af Peak Elev=874.67' Storage=2,719 cf Inflow=4.98 cfs 0.214 afPond 1P: (new Pond) Discarded=0.80 cfs 0.214 af Primary=0.00 cfs 0.000 af Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 af Outflow=0.80 cfs 0.214 af Total Runoff Area = 2.538 ac Runoff Volume = 0.297 af Average Runoff Depth = 1.40" 48.28% Pervious = 1.225 ac 51.72% Impervious = 1.313 ac MSE 24-hr 3 2-year Rainfall=2.79"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 8HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment DA-1: to Hemingway Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 13.45 hrs, Volume= 0.001 af, Depth= 0.03" Routed to Reach 4R : Hemingway Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2-year Rainfall=2.79" Area (sf) CN Description 1,747 98 Paved parking, HSG A 9,996 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 11,743 48 Weighted Average 9,996 85.12% Pervious Area 1,747 14.88% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment DA-1: to Hemingway Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 MSE 24-hr 3 2-year Rainfall=2.79" Runoff Area=11,743 sf Runoff Volume=0.001 af Runoff Depth=0.03" Tc=7.0 min CN=48 0.00 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 2-year Rainfall=2.79"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 9HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment DA-2: to Pavers [46] Hint: Tc=0 (Instant runoff peak depends on dt) Runoff = 4.98 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.214 af, Depth= 2.24" Routed to Pond 1P : (new Pond) Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2-year Rainfall=2.79" Area (sf) CN Description 11,320 98 Paved parking, HSG B 34,483 98 Paved parking, HSG B 4,115 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 49,918 95 Weighted Average 4,115 8.24% Pervious Area 45,803 91.76% Impervious Area Subcatchment DA-2: to Pavers Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 5 4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 2-year Rainfall=2.79" Runoff Area=49,918 sf Runoff Volume=0.214 af Runoff Depth=2.24" Tc=0.0 min CN=95 4.98 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 2-year Rainfall=2.79"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 10HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment DA-3: to Neighbor Runoff = 1.72 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.082 af, Depth= 0.88" Routed to Reach 6R : Neighbor Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2-year Rainfall=2.79" Area (sf) CN Adj Description 9,034 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C 598 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C 39,267 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 48,899 79 76 Weighted Average, UI Adjusted 39,267 80.30% Pervious Area 9,632 19.70% Impervious Area 9,632 100.00% Unconnected Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment DA-3: to Neighbor Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 2-year Rainfall=2.79" Runoff Area=48,899 sf Runoff Volume=0.082 af Runoff Depth=0.88" Tc=7.0 min UI Adjusted CN=76 1.72 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 2-year Rainfall=2.79"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 11HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 4R: Hemingway [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.270 ac, 14.88% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.03" for 2-year event Inflow = 0.00 cfs @ 13.45 hrs, Volume= 0.001 af Outflow = 0.00 cfs @ 13.45 hrs, Volume= 0.001 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach PR : (new Reach) Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 4R: Hemingway Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 Inflow Area=0.270 ac 0.00 cfs 0.00 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 2-year Rainfall=2.79"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 12HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 5R: Catch Basin [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 1.146 ac, 91.76% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.00" for 2-year event Inflow = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Outflow = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach PR : (new Reach) Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 5R: Catch Basin Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 1 0 Inflow Area=1.146 ac 0.00 cfs 0.00 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 2-year Rainfall=2.79"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 13HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 6R: Neighbor [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 1.123 ac, 19.70% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.88" for 2-year event Inflow = 1.72 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.082 af Outflow = 1.72 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.082 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach PR : (new Reach) Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 6R: Neighbor Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 1 0 Inflow Area=1.123 ac 1.72 cfs 1.72 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 2-year Rainfall=2.79"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 14HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach PR: (new Reach) [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 2.538 ac, 51.72% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.39" for 2-year event Inflow = 1.72 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.083 af Outflow = 1.72 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.083 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach PR: (new Reach) Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 1 0 Inflow Area=2.538 ac 1.72 cfs 1.72 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 2-year Rainfall=2.79"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 15HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 1P: (new Pond) Inflow Area = 1.146 ac, 91.76% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.24" for 2-year event Inflow = 4.98 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.214 af Outflow = 0.80 cfs @ 11.72 hrs, Volume= 0.214 af, Atten= 84%, Lag= 0.0 min Discarded = 0.80 cfs @ 11.72 hrs, Volume= 0.214 af Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Routed to Reach 5R : Catch Basin Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Routed to Reach 4R : Hemingway Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 874.67' @ 12.31 hrs Surf.Area= 3,104 sf Storage= 2,719 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 20.8 min calculated for 0.214 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 20.8 min ( 788.8 - 768.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1A 872.44' 3,374 cf 151.33'W x 18.50'L x 3.47'H Field A 9,706 cf Overall - 1,271 cf Embedded = 8,435 cf x 40.0% Voids #2A 875.44' 284 cf PaveDrain S6-45 x 2970 Inside #1 Inside= 7.1"W x 5.6"H => 0.10 sf x 1.00'L = 0.1 cf Outside= 12.0"W x 5.6"H => 0.43 sf x 1.00'L = 0.4 cf 2970 Chambers in 165 Rows #3 875.90' 1,558 cf Above Ground Storage (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) #4 872.44' 326 cf Additional Stone (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) x 0.15 815 cf Overall x 40.0% Voids 5,542 cf Total Available Storage Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 875.90 0 0 0 876.00 768 38 38 876.10 1,357 106 145 876.20 1,957 166 310 876.30 2,540 225 535 876.40 3,106 282 817 876.50 3,700 340 1,158 876.60 4,300 400 1,558 Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 872.44 1,359 0 0 875.44 2,265 5,436 5,436 MSE 24-hr 3 2-year Rainfall=2.79"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 16HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 872.44'0.80 cfs Exfiltration when above 872.44' #2 Primary 867.60'15.0" Round Catch Basin Outlet Culvert L= 25.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 867.60' / 867.35' S= 0.0100 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.015 Concrete sewer w/manholes & inlets, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #3 Device 2 876.13'24.0" x 36.0" Horiz. Catch Basin C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #4 Secondary 876.40'Overflow to Street X 0.00, Cv= 2.62 (C= 3.28) Head (feet) 0.00 0.10 0.20 Width (feet) 2.00 6.00 177.00 #5 Device 2 872.44'12.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #6 Device 5 874.94'Custom Weir/Orifice, Cv= 2.62 (C= 3.28) Head (feet) 2.50 3.50 Width (feet) 2.00 2.00 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.80 cfs @ 11.72 hrs HW=872.48' (Free Discharge) 1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.80 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=872.44' (Free Discharge) 2=Catch Basin Outlet Culvert (Passes 0.00 cfs of 12.13 cfs potential flow) 3=Catch Basin ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 5=Orifice/Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 6=Custom Weir/Orifice ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=872.44' (Free Discharge) 4=Overflow to Street ( Controls 0.00 cfs) MSE 24-hr 3 2-year Rainfall=2.79"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 17HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: (new Pond) - Chamber Wizard Field A Chamber Model = PaveDrain S6-45 (PaveDrain 12x12 Block with gap storage) Inside= 7.1"W x 5.6"H => 0.10 sf x 1.00'L = 0.1 cf Outside= 12.0"W x 5.6"H => 0.43 sf x 1.00'L = 0.4 cf 12.0" Wide - 1.0" Nesting = 11.0" C-C Row Spacing 18 Chambers/Row x 1.00' Long = 18.00' Row Length +0.50' Row Offset = 18.50' Base Length 165 Rows x 12.0" Wide - 1.0" Nesting x 164 = 151.33' Base Width 36.0" Stone Base + 5.6" Chamber Height = 3.47' Field Height 2,970 Chambers x 0.1 cf = 283.6 cf Chamber Storage 2,970 Chambers x 0.4 cf = 1,270.5 cf Displacement 9,705.5 cf Field - 1,270.5 cf Chambers = 8,435.0 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 3,374.0 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 3,657.6 cf = 0.084 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 37.7% Overall System Size = 18.50' x 151.33' x 3.47' 2,970 Chambers 359.5 cy Field 312.4 cy Stone MSE 24-hr 3 2-year Rainfall=2.79"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 18HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: (new Pond) Inflow Outflow Discarded Primary Secondary Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 5 4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=1.146 ac Peak Elev=874.67' Storage=2,719 cf 4.98 cfs 0.80 cfs 0.80 cfs 0.00 cfs 0.00 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 10-year Rainfall=4.15"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 19HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-48.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 4801 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Runoff Area=11,743 sf 14.88% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.31"Subcatchment DA-1: to Hemingway Tc=7.0 min CN=48 Runoff=0.05 cfs 0.007 af Runoff Area=49,918 sf 91.76% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.58"Subcatchment DA-2: to Pavers Tc=0.0 min CN=95 Runoff=7.65 cfs 0.342 af Runoff Area=48,899 sf 19.70% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.85"Subcatchment DA-3: to Neighbor Tc=7.0 min UI Adjusted CN=76 Runoff=3.71 cfs 0.173 af Inflow=0.05 cfs 0.007 afReach 4R: Hemingway Outflow=0.05 cfs 0.007 af Inflow=5.08 cfs 0.052 afReach 5R: Catch Basin Outflow=5.08 cfs 0.052 af Inflow=3.71 cfs 0.173 afReach 6R: Neighbor Outflow=3.71 cfs 0.173 af Inflow=8.10 cfs 0.232 afReach PR: (new Reach) Outflow=8.10 cfs 0.232 af Peak Elev=875.78' Storage=3,966 cf Inflow=7.65 cfs 0.342 afPond 1P: (new Pond) Discarded=0.80 cfs 0.290 af Primary=5.08 cfs 0.052 af Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 af Outflow=5.88 cfs 0.342 af Total Runoff Area = 2.538 ac Runoff Volume = 0.522 af Average Runoff Depth = 2.47" 48.28% Pervious = 1.225 ac 51.72% Impervious = 1.313 ac MSE 24-hr 3 10-year Rainfall=4.15"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 20HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment DA-1: to Hemingway Runoff = 0.05 cfs @ 12.20 hrs, Volume= 0.007 af, Depth= 0.31" Routed to Reach 4R : Hemingway Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-year Rainfall=4.15" Area (sf) CN Description 1,747 98 Paved parking, HSG A 9,996 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 11,743 48 Weighted Average 9,996 85.12% Pervious Area 1,747 14.88% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment DA-1: to Hemingway Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 0.06 0.055 0.05 0.045 0.04 0.035 0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 0 MSE 24-hr 3 10-year Rainfall=4.15" Runoff Area=11,743 sf Runoff Volume=0.007 af Runoff Depth=0.31" Tc=7.0 min CN=48 0.05 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 10-year Rainfall=4.15"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 21HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment DA-2: to Pavers [46] Hint: Tc=0 (Instant runoff peak depends on dt) Runoff = 7.65 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.342 af, Depth= 3.58" Routed to Pond 1P : (new Pond) Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-year Rainfall=4.15" Area (sf) CN Description 11,320 98 Paved parking, HSG B 34,483 98 Paved parking, HSG B 4,115 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 49,918 95 Weighted Average 4,115 8.24% Pervious Area 45,803 91.76% Impervious Area Subcatchment DA-2: to Pavers Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 10-year Rainfall=4.15" Runoff Area=49,918 sf Runoff Volume=0.342 af Runoff Depth=3.58" Tc=0.0 min CN=95 7.65 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 10-year Rainfall=4.15"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 22HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment DA-3: to Neighbor Runoff = 3.71 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.173 af, Depth= 1.85" Routed to Reach 6R : Neighbor Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-year Rainfall=4.15" Area (sf) CN Adj Description 9,034 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C 598 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C 39,267 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 48,899 79 76 Weighted Average, UI Adjusted 39,267 80.30% Pervious Area 9,632 19.70% Impervious Area 9,632 100.00% Unconnected Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment DA-3: to Neighbor Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 10-year Rainfall=4.15" Runoff Area=48,899 sf Runoff Volume=0.173 af Runoff Depth=1.85" Tc=7.0 min UI Adjusted CN=76 3.71 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 10-year Rainfall=4.15"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 23HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 4R: Hemingway [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.270 ac, 14.88% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.31" for 10-year event Inflow = 0.05 cfs @ 12.20 hrs, Volume= 0.007 af Outflow = 0.05 cfs @ 12.20 hrs, Volume= 0.007 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach PR : (new Reach) Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 4R: Hemingway Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 0.06 0.055 0.05 0.045 0.04 0.035 0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 0 Inflow Area=0.270 ac 0.05 cfs 0.05 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 10-year Rainfall=4.15"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 24HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 5R: Catch Basin [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 1.146 ac, 91.76% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.54" for 10-year event Inflow = 5.08 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.052 af Outflow = 5.08 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.052 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach PR : (new Reach) Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 5R: Catch Basin Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 5 4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=1.146 ac 5.08 cfs 5.08 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 10-year Rainfall=4.15"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 25HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 6R: Neighbor [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 1.123 ac, 19.70% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.85" for 10-year event Inflow = 3.71 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.173 af Outflow = 3.71 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.173 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach PR : (new Reach) Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 6R: Neighbor Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=1.123 ac 3.71 cfs 3.71 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 10-year Rainfall=4.15"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 26HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach PR: (new Reach) [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 2.538 ac, 51.72% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.10" for 10-year event Inflow = 8.10 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.232 af Outflow = 8.10 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.232 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach PR: (new Reach) Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=2.538 ac 8.10 cfs 8.10 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 10-year Rainfall=4.15"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 27HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 1P: (new Pond) Inflow Area = 1.146 ac, 91.76% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.58" for 10-year event Inflow = 7.65 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.342 af Outflow = 5.88 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.342 af, Atten= 23%, Lag= 0.6 min Discarded = 0.80 cfs @ 11.61 hrs, Volume= 0.290 af Primary = 5.08 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.052 af Routed to Reach 5R : Catch Basin Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Routed to Reach 4R : Hemingway Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 875.78' @ 12.10 hrs Surf.Area= 3,139 sf Storage= 3,966 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 21.6 min calculated for 0.342 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 21.6 min ( 780.8 - 759.2 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1A 872.44' 3,374 cf 151.33'W x 18.50'L x 3.47'H Field A 9,706 cf Overall - 1,271 cf Embedded = 8,435 cf x 40.0% Voids #2A 875.44' 284 cf PaveDrain S6-45 x 2970 Inside #1 Inside= 7.1"W x 5.6"H => 0.10 sf x 1.00'L = 0.1 cf Outside= 12.0"W x 5.6"H => 0.43 sf x 1.00'L = 0.4 cf 2970 Chambers in 165 Rows #3 875.90' 1,558 cf Above Ground Storage (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) #4 872.44' 326 cf Additional Stone (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) x 0.15 815 cf Overall x 40.0% Voids 5,542 cf Total Available Storage Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 875.90 0 0 0 876.00 768 38 38 876.10 1,357 106 145 876.20 1,957 166 310 876.30 2,540 225 535 876.40 3,106 282 817 876.50 3,700 340 1,158 876.60 4,300 400 1,558 Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 872.44 1,359 0 0 875.44 2,265 5,436 5,436 MSE 24-hr 3 10-year Rainfall=4.15"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 28HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 872.44'0.80 cfs Exfiltration when above 872.44' #2 Primary 867.60'15.0" Round Catch Basin Outlet Culvert L= 25.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 867.60' / 867.35' S= 0.0100 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.015 Concrete sewer w/manholes & inlets, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #3 Device 2 876.13'24.0" x 36.0" Horiz. Catch Basin C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #4 Secondary 876.40'Overflow to Street X 0.00, Cv= 2.62 (C= 3.28) Head (feet) 0.00 0.10 0.20 Width (feet) 2.00 6.00 177.00 #5 Device 2 872.44'12.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #6 Device 5 874.94'Custom Weir/Orifice, Cv= 2.62 (C= 3.28) Head (feet) 2.50 3.50 Width (feet) 2.00 2.00 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.80 cfs @ 11.61 hrs HW=872.49' (Free Discharge) 1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.80 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=5.04 cfs @ 12.10 hrs HW=875.78' (Free Discharge) 2=Catch Basin Outlet Culvert (Passes 5.04 cfs of 16.24 cfs potential flow) 3=Catch Basin ( Controls 0.00 cfs) 5=Orifice/Grate (Passes 5.04 cfs of 6.37 cfs potential flow) 6=Custom Weir/Orifice (Weir Controls 5.04 cfs @ 3.00 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=872.44' (Free Discharge) 4=Overflow to Street ( Controls 0.00 cfs) MSE 24-hr 3 10-year Rainfall=4.15"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 29HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: (new Pond) - Chamber Wizard Field A Chamber Model = PaveDrain S6-45 (PaveDrain 12x12 Block with gap storage) Inside= 7.1"W x 5.6"H => 0.10 sf x 1.00'L = 0.1 cf Outside= 12.0"W x 5.6"H => 0.43 sf x 1.00'L = 0.4 cf 12.0" Wide - 1.0" Nesting = 11.0" C-C Row Spacing 18 Chambers/Row x 1.00' Long = 18.00' Row Length +0.50' Row Offset = 18.50' Base Length 165 Rows x 12.0" Wide - 1.0" Nesting x 164 = 151.33' Base Width 36.0" Stone Base + 5.6" Chamber Height = 3.47' Field Height 2,970 Chambers x 0.1 cf = 283.6 cf Chamber Storage 2,970 Chambers x 0.4 cf = 1,270.5 cf Displacement 9,705.5 cf Field - 1,270.5 cf Chambers = 8,435.0 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 3,374.0 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 3,657.6 cf = 0.084 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 37.7% Overall System Size = 18.50' x 151.33' x 3.47' 2,970 Chambers 359.5 cy Field 312.4 cy Stone MSE 24-hr 3 10-year Rainfall=4.15"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 30HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: (new Pond) Inflow Outflow Discarded Primary Secondary Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=1.146 ac Peak Elev=875.78' Storage=3,966 cf 7.65 cfs 5.88 cfs 0.80 cfs 5.08 cfs 0.00 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 100-year Rainfall=7.40"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 31HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-48.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 4801 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Runoff Area=11,743 sf 14.88% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.70"Subcatchment DA-1: to Hemingway Tc=7.0 min CN=48 Runoff=0.76 cfs 0.038 af Runoff Area=49,918 sf 91.76% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.80"Subcatchment DA-2: to Pavers Tc=0.0 min CN=95 Runoff=13.92 cfs 0.650 af Runoff Area=48,899 sf 19.70% Impervious Runoff Depth=4.62"Subcatchment DA-3: to Neighbor Tc=7.0 min UI Adjusted CN=76 Runoff=9.08 cfs 0.432 af Inflow=0.76 cfs 0.038 afReach 4R: Hemingway Outflow=0.76 cfs 0.038 af Inflow=12.57 cfs 0.222 afReach 5R: Catch Basin Outflow=12.57 cfs 0.222 af Inflow=9.08 cfs 0.432 afReach 6R: Neighbor Outflow=9.08 cfs 0.432 af Inflow=20.38 cfs 0.692 afReach PR: (new Reach) Outflow=20.38 cfs 0.692 af Peak Elev=876.43' Storage=4,913 cf Inflow=13.92 cfs 0.650 afPond 1P: (new Pond) Discarded=0.80 cfs 0.428 af Primary=12.57 cfs 0.222 af Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 af Outflow=13.37 cfs 0.650 af Total Runoff Area = 2.538 ac Runoff Volume = 1.120 af Average Runoff Depth = 5.29" 48.28% Pervious = 1.225 ac 51.72% Impervious = 1.313 ac MSE 24-hr 3 100-year Rainfall=7.40"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 32HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment DA-1: to Hemingway Runoff = 0.76 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.038 af, Depth= 1.70" Routed to Reach 4R : Hemingway Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-year Rainfall=7.40" Area (sf) CN Description 1,747 98 Paved parking, HSG A 9,996 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 11,743 48 Weighted Average 9,996 85.12% Pervious Area 1,747 14.88% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment DA-1: to Hemingway Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 0.8 0.75 0.7 0.65 0.6 0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 MSE 24-hr 3 100-year Rainfall=7.40" Runoff Area=11,743 sf Runoff Volume=0.038 af Runoff Depth=1.70" Tc=7.0 min CN=48 0.76 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 100-year Rainfall=7.40"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 33HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment DA-2: to Pavers [46] Hint: Tc=0 (Instant runoff peak depends on dt) Runoff = 13.92 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.650 af, Depth= 6.80" Routed to Pond 1P : (new Pond) Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-year Rainfall=7.40" Area (sf) CN Description 11,320 98 Paved parking, HSG B 34,483 98 Paved parking, HSG B 4,115 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 49,918 95 Weighted Average 4,115 8.24% Pervious Area 45,803 91.76% Impervious Area Subcatchment DA-2: to Pavers Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 100-year Rainfall=7.40" Runoff Area=49,918 sf Runoff Volume=0.650 af Runoff Depth=6.80" Tc=0.0 min CN=95 13.92 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 100-year Rainfall=7.40"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 34HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment DA-3: to Neighbor Runoff = 9.08 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.432 af, Depth= 4.62" Routed to Reach 6R : Neighbor Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-year Rainfall=7.40" Area (sf) CN Adj Description 9,034 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C 598 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C 39,267 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 48,899 79 76 Weighted Average, UI Adjusted 39,267 80.30% Pervious Area 9,632 19.70% Impervious Area 9,632 100.00% Unconnected Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment DA-3: to Neighbor Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MSE 24-hr 3 100-year Rainfall=7.40" Runoff Area=48,899 sf Runoff Volume=0.432 af Runoff Depth=4.62" Tc=7.0 min UI Adjusted CN=76 9.08 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 100-year Rainfall=7.40"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 35HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 4R: Hemingway [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 0.270 ac, 14.88% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.70" for 100-year event Inflow = 0.76 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.038 af Outflow = 0.76 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.038 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach PR : (new Reach) Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 4R: Hemingway Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 0.8 0.75 0.7 0.65 0.6 0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 Inflow Area=0.270 ac 0.76 cfs 0.76 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 100-year Rainfall=7.40"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 36HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 5R: Catch Basin [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 1.146 ac, 91.76% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.33" for 100-year event Inflow = 12.57 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.222 af Outflow = 12.57 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.222 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach PR : (new Reach) Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 5R: Catch Basin Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=1.146 ac 12.57 cfs 12.57 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 100-year Rainfall=7.40"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 37HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach 6R: Neighbor [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 1.123 ac, 19.70% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 4.62" for 100-year event Inflow = 9.08 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.432 af Outflow = 9.08 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 0.432 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routed to Reach PR : (new Reach) Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach 6R: Neighbor Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=1.123 ac 9.08 cfs 9.08 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 100-year Rainfall=7.40"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 38HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach PR: (new Reach) [40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow) Inflow Area = 2.538 ac, 51.72% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.27" for 100-year event Inflow = 20.38 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.692 af Outflow = 20.38 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.692 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach PR: (new Reach) Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=2.538 ac 20.38 cfs 20.38 cfs MSE 24-hr 3 100-year Rainfall=7.40"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 39HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 1P: (new Pond) [95] Warning: Outlet Device #6 rise exceeded Inflow Area = 1.146 ac, 91.76% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 6.80" for 100-year event Inflow = 13.92 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.650 af Outflow = 13.37 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.650 af, Atten= 4%, Lag= 0.0 min Discarded = 0.80 cfs @ 11.13 hrs, Volume= 0.428 af Primary = 12.57 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.222 af Routed to Reach 5R : Catch Basin Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af Routed to Reach 4R : Hemingway Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 876.43' @ 12.09 hrs Surf.Area= 6,452 sf Storage= 4,913 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 17.4 min calculated for 0.650 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 17.4 min ( 765.5 - 748.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1A 872.44' 3,374 cf 151.33'W x 18.50'L x 3.47'H Field A 9,706 cf Overall - 1,271 cf Embedded = 8,435 cf x 40.0% Voids #2A 875.44' 284 cf PaveDrain S6-45 x 2970 Inside #1 Inside= 7.1"W x 5.6"H => 0.10 sf x 1.00'L = 0.1 cf Outside= 12.0"W x 5.6"H => 0.43 sf x 1.00'L = 0.4 cf 2970 Chambers in 165 Rows #3 875.90' 1,558 cf Above Ground Storage (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) #4 872.44' 326 cf Additional Stone (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) x 0.15 815 cf Overall x 40.0% Voids 5,542 cf Total Available Storage Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 875.90 0 0 0 876.00 768 38 38 876.10 1,357 106 145 876.20 1,957 166 310 876.30 2,540 225 535 876.40 3,106 282 817 876.50 3,700 340 1,158 876.60 4,300 400 1,558 Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 872.44 1,359 0 0 875.44 2,265 5,436 5,436 MSE 24-hr 3 100-year Rainfall=7.40"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 40HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 872.44'0.80 cfs Exfiltration when above 872.44' #2 Primary 867.60'15.0" Round Catch Basin Outlet Culvert L= 25.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 867.60' / 867.35' S= 0.0100 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.015 Concrete sewer w/manholes & inlets, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #3 Device 2 876.13'24.0" x 36.0" Horiz. Catch Basin C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #4 Secondary 876.40'Overflow to Street X 0.00, Cv= 2.62 (C= 3.28) Head (feet) 0.00 0.10 0.20 Width (feet) 2.00 6.00 177.00 #5 Device 2 872.44'12.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads #6 Device 5 874.94'Custom Weir/Orifice, Cv= 2.62 (C= 3.28) Head (feet) 2.50 3.50 Width (feet) 2.00 2.00 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.80 cfs @ 11.13 hrs HW=872.48' (Free Discharge) 1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.80 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=12.51 cfs @ 12.09 hrs HW=876.43' (Free Discharge) 2=Catch Basin Outlet Culvert (Passes 12.51 cfs of 16.93 cfs potential flow) 3=Catch Basin (Weir Controls 5.45 cfs @ 1.80 fps) 5=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 7.07 cfs @ 9.00 fps) 6=Custom Weir/Orifice (Passes 7.07 cfs of 9.68 cfs potential flow) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=872.44' (Free Discharge) 4=Overflow to Street ( Controls 0.00 cfs) MSE 24-hr 3 100-year Rainfall=7.40"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 41HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: (new Pond) - Chamber Wizard Field A Chamber Model = PaveDrain S6-45 (PaveDrain 12x12 Block with gap storage) Inside= 7.1"W x 5.6"H => 0.10 sf x 1.00'L = 0.1 cf Outside= 12.0"W x 5.6"H => 0.43 sf x 1.00'L = 0.4 cf 12.0" Wide - 1.0" Nesting = 11.0" C-C Row Spacing 18 Chambers/Row x 1.00' Long = 18.00' Row Length +0.50' Row Offset = 18.50' Base Length 165 Rows x 12.0" Wide - 1.0" Nesting x 164 = 151.33' Base Width 36.0" Stone Base + 5.6" Chamber Height = 3.47' Field Height 2,970 Chambers x 0.1 cf = 283.6 cf Chamber Storage 2,970 Chambers x 0.4 cf = 1,270.5 cf Displacement 9,705.5 cf Field - 1,270.5 cf Chambers = 8,435.0 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 3,374.0 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 3,657.6 cf = 0.084 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 37.7% Overall System Size = 18.50' x 151.33' x 3.47' 2,970 Chambers 359.5 cy Field 312.4 cy Stone MSE 24-hr 3 100-year Rainfall=7.40"PGL Printed 8/4/2025Prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates Page 42HydroCAD® 10.20-5c s/n 02344 © 2023 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: (new Pond) Inflow Outflow Discarded Primary Secondary Hydrograph Time (hours) 484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420 Fl o w ( c f s ) 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Inflow Area=1.146 ac Peak Elev=876.43' Storage=4,913 cf 13.92 cfs 13.37 cfs 0.80 cfs 12.57 cfs 0.00 cfs Park Grove Library - Stormwater Report Page 12 Cottage Grove, MN Appendix 3. Geotechnical Report Geotechnical Evaluation Report Park Grove Library Addition 7900 Hemmingway Avenue Cottage Grove, Minnesota Prepared for Alliiance Professional Certification: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Timothy J. Schappa, PE Project Engineer License Number: 40159 May 30, 2025 Project B2503502 Braun Intertec Corporation AA/EOE Braun Intertec Corporation May 30, 2025 Project B2503502 Ms. Amber Sausen Alliiance 400 Clifton Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55107 Re: Geotechnical Evaluation Park Grove Library Addition 7900 Hemmingway Avenue Cottage Grove, MN Dear Ms. Sausen: We are pleased to present this Geotechnical Evaluation Report for the building addition project at the above referenced site. Thank you for making Braun Intertec your geotechnical consultant for this project. If you have questions about this report, or if there are other services that we can provide in support of our work to date, please contact Tim Schappa at 651.319.3091 (tschappa@braunintertec.com) or Steve Martin at 612.221.2504 (smartin@braunintertec.com). Sincerely, BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION Timothy J. Schappa, PE Project Engineer Steven B. Martin, PE Senior Engineer Table of Contents Description Page A. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 A.1. Project Description .............................................................................................................. 1 A.2. Existing Building and Site Conditions .................................................................................. 2 A.3. Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 3 A.4. Background Information and Reference Documents .......................................................... 3 A.5. Scope of Services ................................................................................................................. 4 B. Results .............................................................................................................................................. 4 B.1. Geologic Overview .............................................................................................................. 4 B.2. Boring Results ...................................................................................................................... 5 B.3. Groundwater ....................................................................................................................... 6 B.4. Laboratory Test Results ....................................................................................................... 6 C. Recommendations ........................................................................................................................... 7 C.1. Design and Construction Discussion ................................................................................... 7 C.1.a. Building Foundation Support ................................................................................. 7 C.1.b. Reuse of Onsite Soils .............................................................................................. 8 C.2. Site Grading and Subgrade Preparation .............................................................................. 8 C.2.a. Building Subgrade Excavations ............................................................................... 8 C.2.b. Excavation Oversizing ............................................................................................. 8 C.2.c. Excavated Slopes .................................................................................................... 9 C.2.d. Excavation Dewatering ......................................................................................... 10 C.2.e. Pavement and Exterior Slab Subgrade Preparation ............................................. 10 C.2.f. Pavement Subgrade Proofroll .............................................................................. 10 C.2.g. Engineered Fill Materials and Compaction .......................................................... 10 C.2.h. Special Inspections of Soils ................................................................................... 12 C.3. Spread Footings ................................................................................................................. 12 C.4. Interior Slabs ..................................................................................................................... 13 C.4.a. Subgrade Modulus ............................................................................................... 13 C.4.b. Moisture Vapor Protection .................................................................................. 13 C.5. Frost Protection ................................................................................................................. 13 C.6. Pavements and Exterior Slabs ........................................................................................... 15 C.6.a. Design Sections .................................................................................................... 15 C.6.b. Concrete Pavements ............................................................................................ 15 C.6.c. Subgrade Drainage ............................................................................................... 15 C.6.d. Performance and Maintenance ........................................................................... 15 C.7. Utilities .............................................................................................................................. 16 C.7.a. Subgrade Stabilization .......................................................................................... 16 C.7.b. Excavation and Backfilling .................................................................................... 16 C.7.c. Corrosion Potential .............................................................................................. 16 C.8. Equipment Support ........................................................................................................... 17 D. Procedures...................................................................................................................................... 17 D.1. Penetration Test Borings ................................................................................................... 17 D.2. Exploration Logs ................................................................................................................ 17 D.2.a. Log of Boring Sheets ............................................................................................. 17 D.2.b. Geologic Origins ................................................................................................... 18 D.3. Material Classification and Testing ................................................................................... 18 Table of Contents (continued) Description Page D.3.a. Visual and Manual Classification .......................................................................... 18 D.3.b. Laboratory Testing ............................................................................................... 18 D.4. Groundwater Measurements ............................................................................................ 18 E. Qualifications .................................................................................................................................. 18 E.1. Variations in Subsurface Conditions .................................................................................. 18 E.1.a. Material Strata ..................................................................................................... 18 E.1.b. Groundwater Levels ............................................................................................. 19 E.2. Continuity of Professional Responsibility .......................................................................... 19 E.2.a. Plan Review .......................................................................................................... 19 E.2.b. Construction Observations and Testing ............................................................... 19 E.3. Use of Report..................................................................................................................... 20 E.4. Standard of Care ................................................................................................................ 20 Appendix Soil Boring Location Sketch Log of Boring Sheets ST-1 to ST-5 Descriptive Terminology of Soil A. Introduction A.1. Project Description This Geotechnical Evaluation Report addresses the design and construction of a new entrance plaza and outdoor terrace additions to the existing public library. Additionally, reconstruction and expansion of the existing parking lot from a one-way circulation with angled parking to two-way 90 degree parking to meet future demand projects. Figure 1 shows the proposed site layout. Figure 1. Proposed Layout Obtained from the Washington County Park Grove Library Schematic Design Booklet prepared by Alliiance, dated April 18, 2025. The building addition will consist of a two-story space that will replace the east bay of the existing structure and will consist of a two-story space in the northern portion for mechanical equipment and storage located on the second floor while the southern portion will have a two-story open volume space with grade level use only. Table 1 provides a summary of the Project details related to the proposed design. Note that design plans are not completed, and Project details may change in the future. Alliiance Project B2503502 May 30, 2025 Page 2 Table 1. Project Description Below Grade Level None Above Grade Level Two Match Existing, near 880 10 (assumed) 150 (assumed) Nature of Construction Site Grading Pavement Type(s) Assumed Pavement Loads *Equivalent 18,000-lb single axle loads based on 20-year design. We have described our understanding of the proposed construction and site to the extent others reported it to us. Depending on the extent of available information, we may have made assumptions based on our experience with similar projects. If we have not correctly recorded or interpreted the project details, the project team should notify us. New or changed information could require additional evaluation, analyses and/or recommendations. A.2. Existing Building and Site Conditions The existing library is a single-story structure designed and constructed in 1983. The building has a structural steel and steel joist framed roof and super structure supported by reinforced concrete footings. The foundation walls extend to frost depth and are reinforced concrete masonry units (CMU), typically. The skylight framing is elevated from the roof structure with a light steel tube frame supporting gable-shaped steel beams. Site grades to the north, south and east of the existing building are relatively flat with elevations sloping from 880 to about 877 away from the building. The west side of the building has a more significant change in grade, sloping steeply down to around elevation 866. Figure 2 shows the existing site layout. Alliiance Project B2503502 May 30, 2025 Page 3 Figure 2. Existing Site Layout Obtained from the Washington County Park Grove Library Schematic Design Booklet prepared by Alliiance, dated April 18, 2025. A.3. Purpose The purpose of our geotechnical evaluation will be to characterize subsurface geologic conditions at selected exploration locations, evaluate their impact on the project, and provide geotechnical recommendations for the design and construction of the new building addition and parking lot. A.4. Background Information and Reference Documents We reviewed the following information: County Altas Series Atlas C-5, Plate 3 of 7 -Surface Geology for Washington County prepared by the Minnesota Geological Survey, dated 1990. Washington County Park Grove Library Schematic Design Booklet prepared by Alliiance, dated April 18, 2025. Alliiance Project B2503502 May 30, 2025 Page 4 A.5. Scope of Services We performed our scope of services for the project in accordance with our Proposal for a Geotechnical Evaluation (QTB214391), dated May 1, 2025. The following list describes the geotechnical tasks completed in accordance with our authorized scope of services. Reviewing the background information and reference documents previously cited. Staking and clearing the exploration location of underground utilities. The design team selected and we staked the new exploration locations. We acquired the surface elevations and locations with GPS technology using the State of Minnesota’s permanent GPS base station network. The Soil Boring Location Sketch included in the Appendix shows the approximate locations of the borings. Performing six standard penetration test (SPT) borings, denoted as ST-1 to ST-5, to nominal depths of 10 to 20 feet below grade across the site. Performing laboratory testing on select samples to aid in soil classification and engineering analysis. Preparing this report containing a boring location sketch, logs of soil borings, a summary of the soils encountered, results of laboratory tests, and recommendations for structure and pavement subgrade preparation and the design of foundations, floor slabs, exterior slabs, utilities, and pavements. Our scope of services did not include environmental services or testing and our geotechnical personnel performing this evaluation are not trained to provide environmental services or testing. We can provide environmental services or testing at your request. B. Results B.1. Geologic Overview Based upon our review of available geologic resources and our previous experiences in the area, the natural soils in this area consist primarily of alluvial deposits. Alliiance Project B2503502 May 30, 2025 Page 5 We based the geologic origins used in this report on the soil types, in-situ and laboratory testing, and available common knowledge of the geological history of the site. Because of the complex depositional history, geologic origins can be difficult to ascertain. We did not perform a detailed investigation of the geologic history for the site. B.2. Boring Results Table 2 provides a summary of the soil boring results, in the general order we encountered the strata. Please refer to the Log of Boring sheets in the Appendix for additional details. The Descriptive Terminology sheets in the Appendix include definitions of abbreviations used in Table 2. Table 2. Subsurface Profile Summary* ASTM Penetration Pavement Materials Not Applicable (N/A) N/A Bituminous thicknesses at Borings ST-2 and ST-3 were 3 inches. Apparent aggregate base materials were encountered below the bituminous with thicknesses of about 5 and 6 Topsoil Fill ML N/A Contained roots and organic materials. Dark brown in color Existing Fill SM, SP, SP-SM, ML, OL 3 to 25 BPF Encountered below the pavement materials and topsoil fill in Borings ST-1, ST-3, ST-4 and ST-5. The depths of the existing fill were between about 4 and 6 feet in Borings ST-1, ST-3 and ST-4, and extended to a depth of about 12 feet in Boring ST-5. Penetration resistances indicated the fill was variable, indicating the fill was not placed in a controlled manner designed to support buildings. Organic soils were encountered in Borings ST-3 and ST-5 and are not suitable for structural support and is further indication that the fill in these areas was not placed in a controlled manner. Dark brown in color Generally moist to wet. Alluvial SP, SP-SM, ML 3 to 19 BPF Predominantly SP and SP-SM, with an isolated area of embedded silt encountered in Boring ST-1 between depths of about 7 to 10 feet below the existing grades. The soils were typically very loose to medium dense in relative density. Moisture conditions were generally moist except for the Alliiance Project B2503502 May 30, 2025 Page 6 B.3. Groundwater We did not observe groundwater while advancing our borings and it appears that groundwater is below the depths explored. As noted in Table 2, however, the soil borings indicate a layered soil profile consisting of embedded silts that were wet, indicating the site is conducive to perched and trapped water conditions. Project planning should expect groundwater will fluctuate seasonally and annually and perched/trapped water conditions could be present at varying elevations away from the boring locations. B.4. Laboratory Test Results The results of our general laboratory testing performed on select samples including moisture content (MC) tests per ASTM D2216, grain size tests per ASTM D1140 and organic content tests per ASTM D2974 to evaluate the percentage of particles passing the #200 sieve (P200) are presented below in Table 3. Table 3. Laboratory Classification Test Results ST-1 7 1/2 Silt (ML) 31 90 --- ST-3 2 1/2 Existing Fill: Organic Silt (OL) 27 90 5 5 Existing Fill: Silt (ML) 27 97 --- ST-5 2 1/2 Existing Fill: Organic Sandy Lean Clay (OL) 19 --- 5 5 17 67 --- 10 Existing Fill: ML 24 90 --- The Log of Boring Sheets attached in the Appendix present the results of the MC tests in the “MC” column and list the results of the P200 and OC tests in the “Tests or Remarks” column. Alliiance Project B2503502 May 30, 2025 Page 7 C. Recommendations C.1. Design and Construction Discussion The site is suited for the proposed building addition supported on spread footings on native alluvial soils and/or engineered backfill. Notable considerations for development are (1) the site contains existing fill that are fine grained, variable relative densities and were typically wet and containing organic materials, and (2) fine-grained loose sands and silts present on the site. These results in several considerations: The existing fill materials are not considered suitable for building support or direct support of exterior slabs and pavements. The fine-grained existing fill consisting of silts and the organic soils are not considered suitable for re-use as structural backfill and fill. Surface compaction with larger vibratory plates or rollers is recommended to densify loose or disturbed soils. Silts are considered to be highly sensitive to moisture and construction related disturbances which may require partial sub-excavating below footing subgrades and replacement with coarse sand or crushed rock. The embedded silts within the sands are conducive to perched water conditions. C.1.a. Building Foundation Support The existing fill soils located within pavement areas of the present development are considered unsuitable for structural support as they were not placed and compacted in a manner suitable for structural support. Due to the variable soil consistency and composition, including containing zones of organic materials they pose a risk of detrimental amounts of post construction settlements. Soil corrections (removing and replacing the existing fill) are recommended for the proposed building addition to be supported utilizing conventional spread footings. Silts, while stable when undisturbed, become unstable under construction traffic. Soils consisting primarily of silt have a very small range of moisture contents at which they will behave plastically (i.e., moldable and compactable). At moisture contents that are on the high side of this range (where deemed as being “wet”), these soils will behave more like a liquified material when they are disturbed/vibrated. Alliiance Project B2503502 May 30, 2025 Page 8 Even when adequately compacted or stabilized, the silts are judged to be highly susceptible to disturbance or loss of strength as a result of construction traffic. C.1.b. Reuse of Onsite Soils The non-organic on-site granular materials generally appear suitable for reuse as engineered fill at this site provided they can be properly placed, moisture conditioned and compacted. The silts will likely require extensive moisture conditioning as the in-place moisture contents are likely at or above the probable optimum moisture content. Even when adequately compacted or stabilized, the silts are judged to be highly susceptible to disturbance or loss of strength as a result of construction traffic. The contractor should be aware that previously stable subgrades can become disturbed and require more grading efforts. Any materials to be used as engineered fill should be tested and approved by the engineer prior to placement. C.2. Site Grading and Subgrade Preparation C.2.a. Building Subgrade Excavations Based on the borings, we do not anticipate soil corrections below the proposed footing elevations. Excavation depths will vary between the borings. Portions of the excavations may also extend deeper than indicated by the borings. A geotechnical representative should observe the excavations to make the necessary field judgments regarding the suitability of the exposed soils. We recommend removing topsoil and existing fill if encountered below the proposed building pads and their oversize areas. However, if silts are encountered at footing subgrades, up to one foot of subcut below foundations to place coarse sand or crushed rock should be expected at the time of foundation construction. We also recommend having a geotechnical engineer, or an engineering technician working under the direction of a geotechnical engineer, (geotechnical representative) evaluate the suitability of exposed subgrade soils to support the proposed structure. Loose soils in the subgrade may need surface compaction my larger vibratory compactors. C.2.b. Excavation Oversizing When removing unsuitable materials below structures or pavements, we recommend the excavation extend outward and downward at a slope of 1H:1V (horizontal:vertical) or flatter. See Figure 3 for an illustration of excavation oversizing. Alliiance Project B2503502 May 30, 2025 Page 9 Figure 3. Generalized Illustration of Oversizing C.2.c. Excavated Slopes Based on the borings, we anticipate on-site soils in excavations will consist of sands. These soils are typically considered Type C Soil under OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) guidelines. OSHA guidelines indicate unsupported excavations in Type C soils should have a gradient no steeper than 1 1/2H:1V. Slopes constructed in this manner may still exhibit surface sloughing, especially when excavated to the groundwater table. An OSHA-approved qualified person should review the soil classification in the field. Excavations must comply with the requirements of OSHA 29 CFR, Part 1926, Subpart P, “Excavations and Trenches.” This document states excavation safety is the responsibility of the contractor. The project specifications should reference these OSHA requirements. 2. Excavation oversizing minimum of 1 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) slope or flatter 3. Engineered fill as required to meet pavement support or landscaping requirements as defined in C.3 Alliiance Project B2503502 May 30, 2025 Page 10 C.2.d. Excavation Dewatering Based on the soil boring data, we do not expect that excavation for the proposed addition foundations will encounter hydrostatic groundwater conditions. Although groundwater is generally anticipated to be present below the estimated excavation depths for the building construction, any perched and/or collected water should be removed from excavations to facilitate proper backfilling or concrete placement using sumps and pumps. C.2.e. Pavement and Exterior Slab Subgrade Preparation We recommend the following steps for pavement and exterior slab subgrade preparation, understanding the site will have a grade change of about 1-foot or less. 1. Strip any unsuitable soils consisting of topsoil, vegetation, existing structures and pavements from the pavement subgrade area. Existing fill outside of current pavement areas should be further subexcavated to a minimum of 3 feet below existing subgrades. 2. Prior to placement of fill or aggregate base materials we recommend thoroughly compacting the subgrade soils with at least 3 passes of a vibratory roller. 3. Place engineered fill and compact in accordance with Section C.2.g. to the subgrade elevation. 4. Proofroll the aggregate section as described in Section C.2.f. C.2.f. Pavement Subgrade Proofroll After preparing the subgrade as described above and prior to the placement of the aggregate base, we recommend proofrolling the subgrade soils with a fully loaded tandem-axle truck. We also recommend having a geotechnical representative observe the proofroll. Areas that fail the proofroll likely indicate soft or weak areas that will require additional soil correction work to support pavements. The contractor should correct areas that display excessive yielding or rutting during the proofroll, as determined by the geotechnical representative. Possible options for subgrade correction include moisture conditioning and recompaction, subcutting and replacement with soil or crushed aggregate, chemical stabilization and/or geotextiles. We recommend performing a second proofroll after the aggregate base material is in place, and prior to placing bituminous or concrete pavement. C.2.g. Engineered Fill Materials and Compaction Table 4 below contains our recommendations for engineered fill materials. Alliiance Project B2503502 May 30, 2025 Page 11 Table 4. Engineered Fill Materials* Engineered Fill Type Additional Below foundations as needed Stabilization Aggregate Crushed open graded rock 100% passing 2-inch sieve < 5% passing #4 sieve Excludes shale and soft rock Below foundations Below interior Structural fill Retained Fill SP, SP-SM, SM 100% passing 2-inch sieve < 20% passing #200 sieve < 2% Organic Content (OC) Drainage layer Non-frost- Free-draining Non-frost-GP, GW, SP, SW < 50% passing #40 sieve < 2% OC Pavements Pavement fill SP, SP-SM, SM surfaces, where subsidence is not a Non-structural fill SP, SP-SM, SM ML, SC, CL 100% passing 6-inch sieve < 10% OC *More select soils comprised of coarse sands with < 5% passing #200 sieve may be needed to accommodate work occurring in periods of wet or freezing weather. We recommend spreading engineered fill in loose lifts of approximately 8 inches thick. We recommend compacting engineered fill in accordance with the criteria presented below in Table 5. The project documents should specify relative compaction of engineered fill, based on the structure located above the engineered fill, and vertical proximity to that structure. The silts will likely require extensive moisture conditioning as the in-place moisture contents are likely at or above the probable optimum moisture content. Even when adequately compacted or stabilized, the silts are judged to be highly susceptible to disturbance or loss of strength as a result of construction traffic. The contractor should be aware that previously stable subgrades can become disturbed and require more grading efforts. Therefore, silts are preferred to be placed as backfill and fill in landscape areas. Table 5. Compaction Recommendations Summary percent (ASTM D698 – Within building pad and oversizing zones 98 ±3 N/A 100 ±3 N/A 95 ±3 ±3 *Increase compaction requirement to meet compaction required for structure supported by this engineered fill. Alliiance Project B2503502 May 30, 2025 Page 12 The project documents should not allow the contractor to use frozen material as engineered fill or to place engineered fill on frozen material. Frost should not penetrate under foundations during construction. We recommend performing density tests in engineered fill to evaluate if the contractors are effectively compacting the soil and meeting project requirements. C.2.h. Special Inspections of Soils We recommend including the site grading and placement of engineered fill within the building pad under the requirements of Special Inspections, as provided in Chapter 17 of the International Building Code, which is part of the Minnesota State Building Code. Special Inspection requires observation of soil conditions below engineered fill or footings, evaluations to determine if excavations extend to the anticipated soils, and if engineered fill materials meet requirements for type of engineered fill and compaction condition of engineered fill. A licensed geotechnical engineer should direct the Special Inspections of site grading and engineered fill placement. The purpose of these Special Inspections is to evaluate whether the work is in accordance with the approved Geotechnical Report for the project. Special Inspections should include evaluation of the subgrade, observing preparation of the subgrade (surface compaction or dewatering, excavation oversizing, placement procedures and materials used for engineered fill, etc.) and compaction testing of the engineered fill. C.3. Spread Footings Table 6 below contains our recommended parameters for use in the design and construction of spread footings bearing on surface compacted native soils and/or new engineered fill. Table 6. Recommended Spread Footing Design Parameters Maximum net allowable bearing pressure (psf) 3,000 Minimum factor of safety for bearing capacity failure 3.0 Minimum embedment below final exterior grade (inches) Total and differential estimated settlement (inches) Less than or equal to 1 and 2/3, respectively *Actual differential settlement amounts will depend on final loads and foundation layout. When tying into the existing buildings, the total settlement of this new building will be differential to the existing building. We can evaluate differential settlement based on final foundation plans and loadings. Alliiance Project B2503502 May 30, 2025 Page 13 C.4. Interior Slabs C.4.a. Subgrade Modulus Anticipating the interior floor slabs will be placed on compacted granular soils, we recommend using a modulus of subgrade reaction, k, of 200 pounds per square inch per inch of deflection (pci) to design the slabs. If 6 inches of compacted aggregate base, such as Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) Class 5 aggregate base is placed immediately below the floor slab, the k-value can be increased by 50 pounds per square inch. The aggregate base will help provide a stable working platform during construction. We recommend the stabilizing aggregate consist of crushed rock meeting the requirements of MnDOT Specification 3138 for Class 5. No material containing recycled bituminous should be used under interior slabs. C.4.b. Moisture Vapor Protection Excess transmission of water vapor could cause floor dampness, certain types of floor bonding agents to separate, or mold to form under floor coverings. If project planning includes using floor coverings or coatings, we recommend placing a vapor retarder or vapor barrier immediately beneath the slab. We also recommend consulting with floor covering manufacturers regarding the appropriate type, use and installation of the vapor retarder or barrier to preserve warranty assurances. C.5. Frost Protection Due to the very fine-grained nature of the sands and silts prevalent near the surface frost heave can occur under below exterior slabs and pavements. When allowed to become saturated and frozen, unfavorable amounts of general and isolated heaving of the soils and the surface structures supported on them could develop. This type of heaving could affect design drainage patterns and the performance of exterior slabs and pavements, as well as any isolated exterior footings and piers. Note that runoff and infiltration from precipitation are not the only sources of water that can saturate subgrade soils and contribute to frost heave. Roof drainage and irrigation of landscaped areas in close proximity to exterior slabs, pavements, and isolated footings and piers, contribute as well. One method to help limit the potential for heaving to occur is to remove frost-susceptible soils present below the overlying slab or pavement area down to bottom-of-footing grades, and replace the excavated material with non-frost-susceptible, engineered fill. We recommend providing drainage at the base of the subcut, as well as gradual transitions from this subcut (3H:1V or flatter gradient). Figures 5a and 5b show illustrations summarizing some of the recommendations above. Alliiance Project B2503502 May 30, 2025 Page 14 Figure 5a. Frost Protection Geometry Illustration Figure 5b. Frost Protection Geometry Illustration with Stoop Alternative Over the life of the pavement or slab, cracks may develop and joints may open up, which will expose the subgrade and allow water to enter the subgrade. This water entering the subgrade increases the likelihood of heave. It will be critical that the owner develop a detailed maintenance program to repair any cracks and joints that may develop during the useful life of the various surface features. The maintenance program should pay special attention to areas where dissimilar materials abut one another, where construction joints occur and where shrinkage cracks develop. Alliiance Project B2503502 May 30, 2025 Page 15 C.6. Pavements and Exterior Slabs C.6.a. Design Sections Laboratory tests to determine the Hveem Stabilometer R-value for pavement design were not included in our scope of services for this project. Assuming the upper 3 feet of the subgrade will consist of fine-grained SP and SP-SM sands, it is our opinion that an R-value of 40 can be assumed for design purposes. Note the contractor may need to perform limited removal of unsuitable or less suitable soils to achieve this value. With the anticipated subgrade soils and the assumed traffic loads, we recommend the following minimum bituminous pavement sections in Table 7 be used at this site. Table 7. Recommended Bituminous Pavement Sections Minimum bituminous thickness (inches) 3 1/2 4 SPWEA240C 2360 6 6 Class 5 or 6 3135 or 3138 C.6.b. Concrete Pavements For concrete pavements used in areas with higher traffic and turning loads, we recommend a minimum 5 inches of concrete overlying 4 inches of aggregate base. We assumed the concrete pavement sections will have edge support. We recommend placing an aggregate base below the pavement to provide a suitable subgrade for concrete placement, reduce faulting and help dissipate loads. Appropriate mix designs, panel sizing, jointing, doweling, and edge reinforcement are critical to performance of rigid pavements. We recommend you contact your civil engineer to determine the final design or consult with us for guidance on these items. C.6.c. Subgrade Drainage We recommend installing perforated drainpipes throughout pavement areas at low points, around catch basins, and behind curb in landscaped areas. We also recommend installing drainpipes along pavement and exterior slab edges where exterior grades promote drainage toward those edge areas. The contractor should place drainpipes in small trenches, extended at least 8 inches below the granular subbase layer, or below the aggregate base material where no subbase is present. C.6.d. Performance and Maintenance We based the above pavement designs on a 20-year performance life for bituminous. This is the amount of time before we anticipate the pavement will require reconstruction. This performance life assumes Alliiance Project B2503502 May 30, 2025 Page 16 routine maintenance, such as seal coating and crack sealing. The actual pavement life will vary depending on variations in weather, traffic conditions and maintenance. It is common to place the non-wear course of bituminous and then delay placement of wear course. For this situation, we recommend evaluating if the reduced pavement section will have sufficient structure to support construction traffic. Many conditions affect the overall performance of the exterior slabs and pavements. Some of these conditions include the environment, loading conditions and the level of ongoing maintenance. With regard to bituminous pavements in particular, it is common to have thermal cracking develop within the first few years of placement, and continue throughout the life of the pavement. We recommend developing a regular maintenance plan for filling cracks in exterior slabs and pavements to lessen the potential impacts for cold weather distress due to frost heave or warm weather distress due to wetting and softening of the subgrade. C.7. Utilities C.7.a. Subgrade Stabilization The predominantly sandy soils encountered at anticipated invert elevations generally appear suitable for pipe support and we anticipate that utilities can be installed per manufacturer bedding requirements. However, if zones of unstable soils are encountered at pipe invert elevations (i.e., waterbearing soils, very loose silts), they should be subcut about 1 to 2 feet, moisture conditioned and recompacted or replaced with engineered backfill or sand. C.7.b. Excavation and Backfilling We recommend trench excavation and selecting, placing, and compacting utility backfill in accordance with the recommendations provided above in Section C.2.g. Any silts removed from the utility trenches should be backfilled with on-site sandy soils. C.7.c. Corrosion Potential The soil borings at the site consist primarily of sandy soils, and to a lesser extent, silts at depth. The sandy soils are considered non-corrosive to metallic conduits. However, should silts be encountered in areas, they may require additional bedding requirements for utilities. Alliiance Project B2503502 May 30, 2025 Page 17 C.8. Equipment Support The recommendations included in the report may not be applicable to equipment used for the construction and maintenance of this project. We recommend evaluating subgrade conditions in areas of shoring, scaffolding, cranes, pumps, lifts and other construction equipment prior to mobilization to determine if the exposed materials are suitable for equipment support, or require some form of subgrade improvement. We also recommend project planning consider the effect that loads applied by such equipment may have on structures they bear on or surcharge – including pavements, buried utilities, below-grade walls, etc. We can assist you in this evaluation. D. Procedures D.1. Penetration Test Borings We drilled the penetration test borings with a truck-mounted core and auger drill equipped with hollow- stem auger. We performed the borings in general accordance with ASTM D6151 taking penetration test samples at 2 1/2- or 5-foot intervals in general accordance to ASTM D1586. We collected thin-walled tube samples in general accordance with ASTM D1587 at selected depths. The boring logs show the actual sample intervals and corresponding depths. We also collected bulk samples of auger cuttings at selected locations for laboratory testing. We sealed penetration test boreholes meeting the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Environmental Borehole criteria with an MDH-approved grout. We forwarded a sealing record (or sealing records) for those boreholes to the Minnesota Department of Health Well Management Section. D.2. Exploration Logs D.2.a. Log of Boring Sheets The Appendix includes Log of Boring sheets for our penetration test borings. The logs identify and describe the penetrated geologic materials, and present the results of penetration resistance. The logs also present the results of laboratory tests performed on penetration test samples, and groundwater measurements. We inferred strata boundaries from changes in the penetration test samples and the auger cuttings. Because we did not perform continuous sampling, the strata boundary depths are only approximate. The Alliiance Project B2503502 May 30, 2025 Page 18 boundary depths likely vary away from the boring locations, and the boundaries themselves may occur as gradual rather than abrupt transitions. D.2.b. Geologic Origins We assigned geologic origins to the materials shown on the logs and referenced within this report, based on: (1) a review of the background information and reference documents cited above, (2) visual classification of the various geologic material samples retrieved during the course of our subsurface exploration, (3) penetration resistance testing performed for the project, (4) laboratory test results, and (5) available common knowledge of the geologic processes and environments that have impacted the site and surrounding area in the past. D.3. Material Classification and Testing D.3.a. Visual and Manual Classification We visually and manually classified the geologic materials encountered based on ASTM D2488. When we performed laboratory classification tests, we used the results to classify the geologic materials in accordance with ASTM D2487. The Appendix includes a chart explaining the classification system we used. D.3.b. Laboratory Testing The exploration logs in the Appendix note most of the results of the laboratory tests performed on geologic material samples. We performed the tests in general accordance with ASTM procedures. D.4. Groundwater Measurements The drillers checked for groundwater while advancing the penetration test borings, and again after auger withdrawal. We then filled the boreholes as noted on the boring logs. E. Qualifications E.1. Variations in Subsurface Conditions E.1.a. Material Strata We developed our evaluation, analyses and recommendations from a limited amount of site and subsurface information. It is not standard engineering practice to retrieve material samples from exploration locations Alliiance Project B2503502 May 30, 2025 Page 19 continuously with depth. Therefore, we must infer strata boundaries and thicknesses to some extent. Strata boundaries may also be gradual transitions, and project planning should expect the strata to vary in depth, elevation and thickness, away from the exploration locations. Variations in subsurface conditions present between exploration locations may not be revealed until performing additional exploration work, or starting construction. If future activity for this project reveals any such variations, you should notify us so that we may reevaluate our recommendations. Such variations could increase construction costs, and we recommend including a contingency to accommodate them. E.1.b. Groundwater Levels We made groundwater measurements under the conditions reported herein and shown on the exploration logs, and interpreted in the text of this report. Note that the observation periods were relatively short, and project planning can expect groundwater levels to fluctuate in response to rainfall, flooding, irrigation, seasonal freezing and thawing, surface drainage modifications and other seasonal and annual factors. E.2. Continuity of Professional Responsibility E.2.a. Plan Review We based this report on a limited amount of information, and we made a number of assumptions to help us develop our recommendations. We should be retained to review the geotechnical aspects of the designs and specifications. This review will allow us to evaluate whether we anticipated the design correctly, if any design changes affect the validity of our recommendations, and if the design and specifications correctly interpret and implement our recommendations. E.2.b. Construction Observations and Testing We recommend retaining us to perform the required observations and testing during construction as part of the ongoing geotechnical evaluation. This will allow us to correlate the subsurface conditions exposed during construction with those encountered by the borings and provide professional continuity from the design phase to the construction phase. If we do not perform observations and testing during construction, it becomes the responsibility of others to validate the assumption made during the preparation of this report and to accept the construction-related geotechnical engineer-of-record responsibilities. Alliiance Project B2503502 May 30, 2025 Page 20 E.3. Use of Report This report is for the exclusive use of the addressed parties. Without written approval, we assume no responsibility to other parties regarding this report. Our evaluation, analyses and recommendations may not be appropriate for other parties or projects. E.4. Standard of Care In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality. No warranty, express or implied, is made. Appendix HE M M I N G W A Y A V E N U E 79TH STREET S. ST-1 ST-2 ST-3 ST-4 ST-5 F: \ 2 0 2 5 \ B 2 5 0 3 5 0 2 \ C A D \ B 2 5 0 3 5 0 2 . d w g ,Ge o t e c h ,5/ 1 5 / 2 0 2 5 3 : 3 4 : 0 2 P M braunintertec.com 952.995.2000 Minneapolis, MN 55438 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Project No: B2503502 Drawn By: Date Drawn: Checked By: Last Modified:5/15/25 Drawing No: Project Information Drawing Information B2503502 JAG 4/29/25 TJS Park Grove Library 7900 Hemmingway Avenue Cottage Grove, Minnesota Soil Boring Location SketchN DENOTES APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF STANDARD PENETRATION TEST BORING 0 SCALE:1"= 40' 40'20' Elev./ Depth ft 879.0 0.7 875.6 4.0 872.6 7.0 869.6 10.0 864.6 15.0 Wat e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) SANDY SILT (ML), dark brown, moist (TOPSOIL FILL) FILL: SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium- grained, trace Gravel, brown with dark brown, moist POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) SILT (ML), grayish brown, wet, very loose (GLACIAL OUTWASH) POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) END OF BORING Boring immediately backfilled 5 10 15 20 25 30 Sa m p l e Blows (N-Value) Recovery 1-1-3 (4) 10" 4-6-8 (14) 15" 7-7-7 (14) 18" 0-1-2 (3) 18" 2-8-9 (17) 18" 8-7-9 (16) 16" 8-7-10 (17) 15" qₚ tsf MC % 31 Tests or Remarks P200=90% Water not observed while drilling. Water not observed to cave-in depth of 14.5 feet immediately after withdrawal of auger. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2503502 Geotechnical Evaluation Park Grove Library 7900 Hemmingway Avenue Cottage Grove, Minnesota BORING:ST-1 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Washington (US Feet) NORTHING:132568.0 EASTING:468956.0 DRILLER:G Scallon/A Tross LOGGED BY:T Schappa START DATE:05/06/25 END DATE:05/06/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:879.6 ft RIG:GP-4 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Vegetation WEATHER:Fair, 70°F B2503502 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:05/27/2025 ST-1 page 1 of 1 Elev./ Depth ft 876.3 0.8 866.0 11.0 Wat e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) PAVEMENT, 3 inches of bituminous over 6 inches of apparent aggregate base POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, light brown, moist, medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) END OF BORING Boring immediately backfilled 5 10 15 20 25 30 Sa m p l e Blows (N-Value) Recovery 12-9-9 (18) 15" 10-5-6 (11) 14" 6-6-8 (14) 15" 8-9-10 (19) 15" 4-9-6 (15) 14" qₚ tsf MC %Tests or Remarks Water not observed while drilling. Water not observed to cave-in depth of 8.0 feet immediately after withdrawal of auger. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2503502 Geotechnical Evaluation Park Grove Library 7900 Hemmingway Avenue Cottage Grove, Minnesota BORING:ST-2 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Washington (US Feet) NORTHING:132567.6 EASTING:468956.3 DRILLER:G Scallon/A Tross LOGGED BY:T Schappa START DATE:05/06/25 END DATE:05/06/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:877.0 ft RIG:GP-4 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Pavement WEATHER:Fair, 70°F B2503502 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:05/27/2025 ST-2 page 1 of 1 Elev./ Depth ft 878.3 0.7 875.5 3.5 873.0 6.0 867.0 12.0 864.0 15.0 Wat e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) PAVEMENT, 3 inches of bituminous over 5 inches of apparent aggregate base FILL: ORGANIC SILT (OL), trace roots, dark brown, wet FILL: SILT (ML), brown with dark brown, wet POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP-SM), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist, very loose to medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist, loose to medium dense (GLACIAL OUTWASH) END OF BORING Boring immediately backfilled 5 10 15 20 25 30 Sa m p l e Blows (N-Value) Recovery 13-5-7 (12) 14" 3-3-4 (7) 16" 0-2-2 (4) 16" 2-1-2 (3) 15" 5-6-4 (10) 16" 16-11-5 (16) 12" 5-4-5 (9) 13" qₚ tsf MC % 27 27 Tests or Remarks P200=90% OC=5% P200=97% Water not observed while drilling. Water not observed to cave-in depth of 12.5 feet immediately after withdrawal of auger. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2503502 Geotechnical Evaluation Park Grove Library 7900 Hemmingway Avenue Cottage Grove, Minnesota BORING:ST-3 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Washington (US Feet) NORTHING:132423.9 EASTING:469000.7 DRILLER:G Scallon/A Tross LOGGED BY:T Schappa START DATE:05/06/25 END DATE:05/06/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:879.0 ft RIG:GP-4 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Pavement WEATHER:Fair, 70°F B2503502 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:05/27/2025 ST-3 page 1 of 1 Elev./ Depth ft 878.8 1.0 875.8 4.0 858.8 21.0 Wat e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) SANDY SILT (ML), with roots, dark brown (TOPSOIL FILL) FILL: POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, intermixed with Sandy Silt, trace Gravel, brown with dark brown, moist POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, light brown, moist, medium dense to loose (GLACIAL OUTWASH) END OF BORING Boring immediately grouted 5 10 15 20 25 30 Sa m p l e Blows (N-Value) Recovery 1-10-13 (23) 13" 12-13-12 (25) 12" 15-8-6 (14) 10" 5-7-7 (14) 13" 7-5-6 (11) 15" 2-6-8 (14) 16" 8-5-6 (11) 11" 5-4-4 (8) 15" qₚ tsf MC %Tests or Remarks Water not observed while drilling. Water not observed to cave-in depth of 16.5 feet immediately after withdrawal of auger. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2503502 Geotechnical Evaluation Park Grove Library 7900 Hemmingway Avenue Cottage Grove, Minnesota BORING:ST-4 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Washington (US Feet) NORTHING:132367.1 EASTING:468865.7 DRILLER:G Scallon/A Tross LOGGED BY:T Schappa START DATE:05/06/25 END DATE:05/06/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:879.8 ft RIG:GP-4 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Vegetation WEATHER:Fair, 70°F B2503502 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:05/27/2025 ST-4 page 1 of 1 Elev./ Depth ft 880.0 0.7 873.6 7.0 871.6 9.0 868.6 12.0 865.6 15.0 Wat e r Le v e l Description of Materials (Soil-ASTM D2488 or 2487; Rock-USACE EM 1110-1-2908) SANDY SILT (ML), dark brown, moist (TOPSOIL FILL) FILL: SANDY ORGANIC CLAY (OL), dark brown with brown, moist FILL: POORLY GRADED SAND with SILT (SP- SM), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist FILL: SILT (ML), grayish brown with dark brown, wet POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), fine to medium-grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist (GLACIAL OUTWASH) END OF BORING Boring immediately backfilled 5 10 15 20 25 30 Sa m p l e Blows (N-Value) Recovery 1-2-3 (5) 12" 5-7-8 (15) 16" 4-4-4 (8) 18" 5-2-3 (5) 16" 1-1-2 (3) 16" 8-6-7 (13) 15" 2-7-9 (16) 13" qₚ tsf MC % 19 17 24 Tests or Remarks OC=5% P200=67% P200=90% Water not observed while drilling. Water not observed to cave-in depth of 14.0 feet immediately after withdrawal of auger. LOG OF BORING See Descriptive Terminology sheet for explanation of abbreviations Project Number B2503502 Geotechnical Evaluation Park Grove Library 7900 Hemmingway Avenue Cottage Grove, Minnesota BORING:ST-5 LOCATION: Captured with RTK GPS. DATUM:NAD 1983 HARN Adj MN Washington (US Feet) NORTHING:132474.8 EASTING:468689.2 DRILLER:G Scallon/A Tross LOGGED BY:T Schappa START DATE:05/06/25 END DATE:05/06/25 SURFACE ELEVATION:880.6 ft RIG:GP-4 METHOD:3 1/4" HSA SURFACING:Vegetation WEATHER:Fair, 70°F B2503502 Braun Intertec Corporation Print Date:05/27/2025 ST-5 page 1 of 1 Descriptive Terminology of Soil Based on Standards ASTM D2487/2488 (Unified Soil Classification System) Group S mbol Group NameB Cu ≥ 4 and 1 ≤ Cc ≤ 3D GW Well‐graded gravelE Cu < 4 and/or (Cc < 1 or Cc > 3)D GP Poorly graded gravelE Fines classify as ML or MH GM Silty gravelE F G Fines Classify as CL or CH GC Clayey gravelE F G Cu ≥ 6 and 1 ≤ Cc ≤ 3D SW Well‐graded sandI Cu < 6 and/or (Cc < 1 or Cc > 3)D SP Poorly graded sandI Fines classify as ML or MH SM Silty sandF G I Fines classify as CL or CH SC Clayey sandF G I CL Lean clayK L M PI < 4 or plots below "A" lineJ ML SiltK L M Organic OL CH Fat clayK L M MH Elastic siltK L M Organic OH PT Peat Highly Organic Soils Silts and Clays (Liquid limit less than 50) Silts and Clays (Liquid limit 50 or more) Primarily organic matter, dark in color, and organic odor Inorganic Inorganic PI > 7 and plots on or above "A" lineJ PI plots on or above "A" line PI plots below "A" line Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Group Names Using Laboratory TestsA Soil Classification Co a r s e ‐gr a i n e d So i l s (m o r e th a n 50 % re t a i n e d on No . 20 0 si e v e ) Fi n e ‐gr a i n e d So i l s (5 0 % or mo r e pa s s e s th e No . 20 0 si e v e ) Sands (50% or more coarse fraction passes No. 4 sieve) Clean Gravels (Less than 5% finesC) Gravels with Fines (More than 12% finesC) Clean Sands (Less than 5% finesH) Sands with Fines (More than 12% finesH) Gravels (More than 50% of coarse fraction retained on No. 4 sieve) Liquid Limit − oven dried Liquid Limit − not dried <0.75 Organic clay K L M N Organic silt K L M O Liquid Limit − oven dried Liquid Limit − not dried <0.75 Organic clay K L M P Organic silt K L M Q Particle Size Identification Boulders.............. over 12" Cobbles................ 3" to 12" Gravel Coarse............. 3/4" to 3" (19.00 mm to 75.00 mm) Fine................. No. 4 to 3/4" (4.75 mm to 19.00 mm) Sand Coarse.............. No. 10 to No. 4 (2.00 mm to 4.75 mm) Medium........... No. 40 to No. 10 (0.425 mm to 2.00 mm) Fine.................. No. 200 to No. 40 (0.075 mm to 0.425 mm) Silt........................ No. 200 (0.075 mm) to .005 mm Clay...................... < .005 mm Relative ProportionsL, M trace............................. 0 to 5% little.............................. 6 to 14% with.............................. ≥ 15% Inclusion Thicknesses lens............................... 0 to 1/8" seam............................. 1/8" to 1" layer.............................. over 1" Apparent Relative Density of Cohesionless Soils Very loose ..................... 0 to 4 BPF Loose ............................ 5 to 10 BPF Medium dense.............. 11 to 30 BPF Dense............................ 31 to 50 BPF Very dense.................... over 50 BPF A. Based on the material passing the 3‐inch (75‐mm) sieve. B. If field sample contained cobbles or boulders, or both, add "with cobbles or boulders, or both" to group name. C. Gravels with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: GW‐GM well‐graded gravel with silt GW‐GC well‐graded gravel with clay GP‐GM poorly graded gravel with silt GP‐GC poorly graded gravel with clay D. Cu = D60 / D10 Cc = 𝐷30 2 / 𝐷10 𝑥 𝐷60) E. If soil contains ≥ 15% sand, add "with sand" to group name. F. If fines classify as CL‐ML, use dual symbol GC‐GM or SC‐SM. G. If fines are organic, add "with organic fines" to group name. H. Sands with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: SW‐SM well‐graded sand with silt SW‐SC well‐graded sand with clay SP‐SM poorly graded sand with silt SP‐SC poorly graded sand with clay I. If soil contains ≥ 15% gravel, add "with gravel" to group name. J. If Atterberg limits plot in hatched area, soil is CL‐ML, silty clay. K. If soil contains 15 to < 30% plus No. 200, add "with sand" or "with gravel", whichever is predominant. L. If soil contains ≥ 30% plus No. 200, predominantly sand, add “sandy” to group name. M. If soil contains ≥ 30% plus No. 200 predominantly gravel, add “gravelly” to group name. N. PI ≥ 4 and plots on or above “A” line. O. PI < 4 or plots below “A” line. P. PI plots on or above “A” line. Q. PI plots below “A” line. Laboratory Tests DD Dry density, pcf qp Pocket penetrometer strength, tsf WD Wet density, pcf qU Unconfined compression test, tsf P200 % Passing #200 sieve LL Liquid limit MC Moisture content, %PL Plastic limit OC Organic content, %PI Plasticity index Consistency of Blows Approximate Unconfined Cohesive Soils Per Foot Compressive Strength Very soft................... 0 to 1 BPF................... < 0.25 tsf Soft........................... 2 to 4 BPF................... 0.25 to 0.5 tsf Medium.................... 5 to 8 BPF .................. 0.5 to 1 tsf Stiff........................... 9 to 15 BPF................. 1 to 2 tsf Very Stiff................... 16 to 30 BPF............... 2 to 4 tsf Hard.......................... over 30 BPF................ > 4 tsf Drilling Notes: Blows/N‐value: Blows indicate the driving resistance recorded for each 6‐inch interval. The reported N‐value is the blows per foot recorded by summing the second and third interval in accordance with the Standard Penetration Test, ASTM D1586. Partial Penetration:If the sampler could not be driven through a full 6‐inch interval, the number of blows for that partial penetration is shown as #/x" (i.e. 50/2"). The N‐value is reported as "REF" indicating refusal. Recovery: Indicates the inches of sample recovered from the sampled interval. For a standard penetration test, full recovery is 18", and is 24" for a thinwall/shelby tube sample. WOH: Indicates the sampler penetrated soil under weight of hammer and rods alone; driving not required. WOR: Indicates the sampler penetrated soil under weight of rods alone; hammer weight and driving not required. Water Level: Indicates the water level measured by the drillers either while drilling ( ), at the end of drilling ( ), or at some time after drilling ( ). Moisture Content: Dry:Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch. Moist: Damp but no visible water. Wet: Visible free water, usually soil is below water table. 5/2021 Park Grove Library - Stormwater Report Page 13 Cottage Grove, MN Appendix 4. Grading and Drainage Plan and Drainage Details UP HE M I N G W A Y A V E N U E S O U T H EXISTING BUILDING ±21,181 SF FFE: 880.00 PROPOSED BUILDING ±20,355 SF 87 0 875 880 86 9 87 1 87 2 873 874 876 877 878 879 86 5 870 87 5 880 863 86 4 866 867 868 869 871 87 2 87 3 87 4 87 6 87 7 878 879 880 876 877 878 879 881 881 881 882 882 883 883 87 5 87 3 87 4 87 6 87 7 877 87 8 878 87 9 87 9 87 9 879 87 5 87 487 6 877 87 8 87 6 87 6 87 6 87 7 87 8 87 9 88 0 877 87 7 87 8 87 9 88 0 877 878 877 878 879 2.7 % 4.5% 3.3% 3.0% 2.6% 2.9% 2.3% 1.3% 2. 3 % PAVEDRAIN STONE VOLUME ±9,050 CF 100-YEAR HWL: 876.32 STONE DEPTH: 3.0' G:879.24 G:879.57 T/G:879.60 T/G:879.66 T/G:879.87 T/G:879.87 T/G:879.91 G:879.24 G:878.87 T/G:878.87 G:874.39 G:879.03 G:879.30 G:879.10 G:879.00 G:879.03 G:879.12 G:879.24 G:879.21 LP:878.98 G:879.08 G:879.20 G:876.13 G:876.04 G:876.02 G:875.98 G:875.90 G:875.90 G:875.88 G:875.71 G:874.45 T/G:873.85 G:875.65 G:877.83 G:877.98 G:877.33 G:877.12 1.5% 2.2 % 3.6% 4.0% 881 882 883 883 884 88 4 RD A IE:873.50 SE PERFORATED NYLOPLAST 101 RE:876.46 IE:872.44 W CONNECT TO EXISTING IE:872.14 N PERFORATED NYLOPLAST 102 RE:876.45 IE:872.44 NE CB 103 RE:875.71 IE:872.73 N IE:872.73 SW CB 104 RE:875.65 IE:872.97 W IE:872.97 S CB 105 RE:878.63 IE:875.14 E 153 LF - 6" PVC @ 0.50% 24 LF - 15" HDPE @ 1.00% 29 LF - 15" HDPE @ 1.00% 217 LF - 12" HDPE @ 1.00% 4.0% G:879.30 G:879.30 T/G:879.30 G:879.30 T/G:879.30 ME:874.35 ME:874.02 875 874 876 877 878 879 TW:880.00TW:879.75 TW:879.49 BW:877.37 BW:879.49 BW:880.00 879.91 879.82 4.9% 4.1% 3.2% 3.1% 879.80 FFE = 880.0 879.72 879.96 FFE = 880.0 879.96 879.90 879.94 FFE = 880.0 FFE = 880.0 879.86 879.81 879.74879.80 879.73 879.80 879.65 879.51 FFE = 880.0 879.67 FFE = 880.0 FFE = 880.0FFE = 880.0 876.00 FFE = 880.0 FFE = 880.0 FFE = 880.0 FFE = 880.0 FFE = 880.0 1.2 % 68 : 1 7.0% 6.3% 9:1 4:1 7: 1 3: 1 4:1 8:1 5: 1 4:1 13:1 13:1 NYLOPLAST 106 RE:879.50 IE:873.20 NW IE:873.20 E G:877.32 G:877.05 G:877.30 G:878.03 G:878.28 G:877.53G:878.34 G:878.55 879.59 879.92 879.42 879.42 879.92 879.92 FFE = 880.0 T/G:873.95 T/G:873.76 ME:874.05 ME:873.82 873.67 873.64 876.17 876.14 876.35 ME:873.54 ME:873.57 T/G:874.01 GRADING ENLARGEMENT 87 5 88 0 88 0 87 487 4876877 878879 88 0 876 877 878 879 G:879.01 T/G:879.00 T/G:879.01 879.50 879.51 879.58 879.58 G:879.93 21 L F - 6 " P V C @ 1 . 4 0 % NORTH HALF PERFORATED NYLOPLAST 100 RE:876.29 WEIR:874.94 IE:872.44 S 31 LF - 12" PVC @ 0.96% 877 87 5 87 487 6 877 87 8 4.5% 3.3% ME:873.75 G:878.87 T/G:878.87 G:874.39 T/G:878.74 T/G:878.83 G:879.03 G:875.90 G:875.88 G:875.79 G:875.71 G:874.45 T/G:873.85 G:875.65 G:877.83 G:878.01 G:878.19 G:877.98 G:877.33 G:877.16 G:877.12 3.6% G:879.30 G:879.30 T/G:879.30 ME:874.35 ME:874.02 T/G:875.81 G:875.77 T/G:875.84 4.9% 4.1% 3.2% T/G:876.99 T/G:877.08 T/G:878.05 T/G:878.14 G:877.12 G:876.95 875.55 875.58 877.49 877.58877.64 877.55878.23 878.32 878.29 878.38 878.77879.27 T/G:873.95 T/G:873.76873.82 873.93 873.90 ME:874.05 ME:873.82 873.85 879.35 G:878.91 G:878.83 G:875.87 874.40 874.34 874.35 874.29 873.96 873.98 T/G:874.01 GRADING ENLARGEMENT 87 5 88 0 87 4 87 4 876877 878 879 8.33% 1. 0 1 % 8.33% 1. 5 1 % 1.00% 6. 5 9 % 1.5% 1.4 % 1.4 % 1.1% 1.8 % 1.8 %1.8%1.6% 4.63% 1. 5 0 % 4.90% 0. 5 5 % 0.99% 2. 7 2 % 4.00% 1. 5 0 % A 2 3 4 5 6 B C D E 1 PROJECT CLIENT ARCHITECT Alliiance 400 Clifton Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55403 612.874.4100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER Meyer Borgman Johnson 801 Nicollet Mall Suite W2000 Minneapoils, MN 55402 612.338.0713 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING ENGINEERS Emanuelson-Podas, Inc. 7705 Bush Lake Rd Edina, MN 55439 952.930.0050 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Aune Fernandez Landscape Architects 755 Prior Ave N #104 St. Paul, MN 55104 661.341.3611 CIVIL ENGINEER Kimley-Horn 767 N Eustis St #100 St. Paul, MN 55114 651.645.4197 ISSUED FOR DATE Copyright Alliiance PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION COMMISSION NO Washington County Park Grove Library DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 07/25/2025 PLANNING SUBMISSION 07/30/2025 GRADING PLAN NOTES 1.PERFORM GRADING WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2.CONTACT STATE 811 CALL-BEFORE-YOU-DIG LOCATING SERVICE AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION FOR UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 4.FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS IMPACTING THE PROPOSED DESIGN OF THE PROJECT. 5.IN PAVED AREAS, ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE THE SITE READY FOR SUB-BASE. 6.SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. 7.ELEVATIONS SHOWN REPRESENT FINISHED SURFACE GRADES. SPOT ELEVATIONS ALONG CURB & GUTTER REPRESENT THE FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 8.EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 9.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES THAT PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE TO COLLECTION POINTS. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 1.25% IN ASPHALT PAVEMENT AREAS AND A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 0.50% IN CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS. 10.MAINTAIN A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 0.50% ALONG CURB & GUTTER. REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD THE GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS AWAY FROM THE GUTTER. 11.INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 4-INCHES OF AGGREGATE BASE MATERIAL UNDER PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, SIDEWALKS, AND TRAILS UNLESS OTHERWISE DETAILED. 12.GRADING FOR SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES, INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS, SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT STATE & NATIONAL ADA STANDARDS: ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 8.3% (1:12). SIDEWALK CROSS-SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0%. LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 5.0%. ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS AND ACCESS AISLES SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0% IN ANY DIRECTION. A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 1.50% IS PREFERRED. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVEMENT INSTALLATION. CHANGE ORDERS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR ADA COMPLIANCE ISSUES. 13.UPON COMPLETION OF LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES, RESTORE ADJACENT OFFSITE AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION TO MATCH OR EXCEED THE ORIGINAL CONDITION. LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE RE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF 4-INCHES OF TOPSOIL. 14.EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLANS FOR LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN, AND OTHER BUILDING UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTIONS. PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR925 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION100.00 LEGEND PROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATION HP:0.0 PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATION PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT ELEVATION LP:0.0 G:0.00 T:0.00 PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ELEVATION T/G:0.0 EOF:0.0 0.0%PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION ME:0.0 MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUT PROPOSED RIPRAP PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION PROPOSED RIDGE LINE PROPOSED SWALE PROPOSED GRADE AT TOP/BOTTOM OF WALLTW:0.0 BW:0.0 STORM SEWER NOTES 1.INSTALL STORM SEWER IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY OR STATE SPECIFICATIONS, STATE PLUMBING CODE, AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2.CONTACT STATE 811 CALL-BEFORE-YOU-DIG LOCATING SERVICE AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION FOR UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS. 3.STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP: ASTM C-76 HDPE: ASTM F-714, F-894 PVC: ASTM D-2729 PVC SCH40: ASTM D-1785, D-2665, F-794 DRAIN TILE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: PE: ASTM F-6667 PVC: ASTM D-2729 FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP: ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443 HDPE: ASTM D-3212 PVC: ASTM D-2729, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212 PVC SCH40: ASTM D-2665, F-794, F-1866 4.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 5.FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS IMPACTING THE PROPOSED DESIGN OF THE PROJECT. 6.EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLANS FOR LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN, AND OTHER BUILDING UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTIONS. REFER TO THE GRADING PLAN FOR DETAILED SURFACE ELEVATIONS. 7.EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 8.COORDINATE WITH THE PLUMBING PLANS FOR THE LOCATION, SIZE AND ELEVATION OF THE PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ROOF DRAIN CONNECTIONS. 9.WHERE STORM SEWER ROOF DRAINS HAVE LESS THAN 4-FEET OF COVER IN PAVED AREAS OR 3-FEET OF COVER IN LANDSCAPE AREAS, PROVIDE 3-INCH THICK INSULATION A MINIMUM OF 5-FEET IN WIDTH, CENTERED ON THE PIPE. 10.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE JOINTS SHALL BE WATER-TIGHT CONNECTIONS. 11.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT. BOOTED COUPLERS AT THE STRUCTURE OR A WATER STOP WITH NON-SHRINK GROUT MAY BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL CODES. 12.CONTRACTOR SHALL AIR TEST ALL STORM SEWER PIPE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL CODE REQUIREMENTS. 0.00%PROPOSED GRADE BETWEEN POINTS CO D Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call R NORTH PERVIOUS PAVERS SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION UNDERGROUND STONE SEE DETAILS FOR SECTION GR A D I N G A N D D R A I N A G E P L A N C5 0 0 GRADING ENLARGEMENT A NORTH A 2 3 4 5 6 B C D E 1 PROJECT CLIENT ARCHITECT Alliiance 400 Clifton Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55403 612.874.4100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER Meyer Borgman Johnson 801 Nicollet Mall Suite W2000 Minneapoils, MN 55402 612.338.0713 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING ENGINEERS Emanuelson-Podas, Inc. 7705 Bush Lake Rd Edina, MN 55439 952.930.0050 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Aune Fernandez Landscape Architects 755 Prior Ave N #104 St. Paul, MN 55104 661.341.3611 CIVIL ENGINEER Kimley-Horn 767 N Eustis St #100 St. Paul, MN 55114 651.645.4197 ISSUED FOR DATE Copyright Alliiance PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION COMMISSION NO Washington County Park Grove Library DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 07/25/2025 PLANNING SUBMISSION 07/30/2025 CI V I L D E T A I L S C7 0 1 79th Street He m i n g w a y A v e S Existing library signage 6’ wide stairs Plinth for planter or public art Enhanced landscaping (shrubs & perennials) Striped on-street parking Seasonal planters Pavers in bumpout areas New street trees Concept 1 July 2025 Design Narrative • Added curb bumpouts with integral pavers create protected, striped on-street parking • Bumpouts create opportunities for introducing plant material near intersections through the use of seasonal planters • 10-foot wide stairs provide access from sidewalk and on- street parking to library parking lot • Enhanced planting (shrubs and perennials) creates new entry experience to library site for pedestrians using stairs • Plinth adjacent to stairs creates opportunity for specialty planter or public art installation • New street trees provide shade for parking and sidewalks Park Grove Library - Design Development Open House | July 29th, 2025 Exterior view of the addition - Southeast Corner Perspective View Design Development | Exterior Development 2 3 4 5 61 PROJECT CLIENT ARCHITECT Alliiance 400 Clifton Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55403 612.874.4100 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER Meyer Borgman Johnson 801 Nicollet Mall Suite W2000 Minneapoils, MN 55402 612.338.0713 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING ENGINEERS Emanuelson-Podas, Inc. 7705 Bush Lake Rd Edina, MN 55439 952.930.0050 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Aune Fernandez Landscape Architects 755 Prior Ave N #104 St. Paul, MN 55104 661.341.3611 CIVIL ENGINEER Kimley-Horn 767 N Eustic St #100 St. Paul, MN 55114 651.645.4197 Washington County Park Grove Library City of Cottage Grove Material Requirements 11-3-11: Architectural Design Standards Non Residential Building (3) Different Class 1 Materials Minimum of 65% Class 1 or 2 Materials No more than 10% Class 4 Materials Class 1 Materials: Belden Ebony Black Smooth (Fired Clay Faced Brick) Transparent Glass Existing Fired Clay Faced Brick Class 2 Materials: N/A Class 3 Materials: Architectural Metal Panels Class 4 Materials: Steel Siding Material Percentage Break Down Class 1 Materials 8165 sf / 10,392 sf = 79% Class 2 Materials 0 sf / 10,392 sf =0% Class 3 Materials 2116 sf / 10,392 sf = 20% Class 4 Materials 110 sf / 10392 sf = 1% Material Narrative We are proposing using a Fired Clay Faced Brick, Ebony Black Smooth by Belden, as the primary facade material for the addition, this brick doesn't match the existing brick but rather it compliments it adding a different material to break up the original monolithic facade and easily signalling to patrons that this is a significant re-imagining of the original library. This darker brick is also emblematic of newer buildings in cottage grove picking up on similar dark tones found in the Central Fire Station, Glacial Valley Park, and The Ravine Regional Park Building. For a secondary facade material we are proposing using an Architectural Metal Panel, Anodized Diamond Tile by Millennium Forms, this smaller metal tile breaks up the facade to instill a Civic feeling rather than using larger scale panels that may indicate to patrons a undesirable industrial feeling. The panels will be a mix of three different anodized colors creating a graident effect across the facade. This gradient symbolizes waves and natural enviorment that is present in Cottage Grove. Where different materials such as; the existing brick and the new brick as well as the new brick and the architectural metal panel creates a set of unique conditions. These areas are what we are descibing as 'The Confluence', where two materials adds the opportunity to create a blend through corbeling and mixing materials similar to the confluence of the Mississippi River at Cottage Grove. The remainder of the facade is dedicated to Transparent Glass, providing patrons with views and connections both into the libary and to the natural landscape being developed around the library. 1/8" = 1'-0"1A EXTERIOR ELEVATION - NORTH Copy 1 A 2 3 B C 1 1/8" = 1'-0"1B EXTERIOR ELEVATION - SOUTH Copy 1 1/8" = 1'-0"1A EXTERIOR ELEVATION - NORTH Copy 1 Park Grove Library - Design Development Open House | July 29th, 2025 Interior view of main library stacks area Perspective View Design Development | Interior Development A 2 3 4 5 6 B C 1 City of Cottage Grove Material Requirements 11-3-11: Architectural Design Standards Non Residential Building (3) Different Class 1 Materials Minimum of 65% Class 1 or 2 Materials No more than 10% Class 4 Materials Class 1 Materials: Belden Ebony Black Smooth (Fired Clay Faced Brick) Transparent Glass Existing Fired Clay Faced Brick Class 2 Materials: N/A Class 3 Materials: Architectural Metal Panels Class 4 Materials: Steel Siding Material Percentage Break Down Class 1 Materials 8165 sf / 10,392 sf = 79% Class 2 Materials 0 sf / 10,392 sf =0% Class 3 Materials 2116 sf / 10,392 sf = 20% Class 4 Materials 110 sf / 10392 sf = 1% Material Narrative We are proposing using a Fired Clay Faced Brick, Ebony Black Smooth by Belden, as the primary facad material for the addition, this brick doesn't match the existing brick but rather it compliments it adding a different material to break up the original monolithic facade and easily signalling to patrons that this is a significant re-imagining of the original library. This darker brick is also emblematic of newer buildings in cottage grove picking up on similar dark tones found in the Central Fire Station, Glacial Valley Park, and The Ravine Regional Park Building. For a secondary facade material we are proposing using an Architectural Metal Panel, Anodized Diamon Tile by Millennium Forms, this smaller metal tile breaks up the facade to instill a Civic feeling rather than using larger scale panels that may indicate to patrons a undesirable industrial feeling. The panels will be a mix of three different anodized colors creating a graident effect across the facade. This gradient symbolizes waves and natural enviorment that is present in Cottage Grove. Where different materials such as; the existing brick and the new brick as well as the new brick and the architectural metal panel creates a set of unique conditions. These areas are what we are descibing as 'The Confluence', where two materials adds the opportunity to create a blend through corbeling and mixing materials similar to the confluence of the Mississippi River at Cottage Grove. The remainder of the facade is dedicated to Transparent Glass, providing patrons with views and connections both into the libary and to the natural landscape being developed around the library. 1/8" = 1'-0"1B EXTERIOR ELEVATION - SOUTH Copy 1 1/8" = 1'-0"1A EXTERIOR ELEVATION - NORTH Copy 1 A 2 3 4 5 6 B C 1 City of Cottage Grove Material Requirements 11-3-11: Architectural Design Standards Non Residential Building (3) Different Class 1 Materials Minimum of 65% Class 1 or 2 Materials No more than 10% Class 4 Materials Class 1 Materials: Belden Ebony Black Smooth (Fired Clay Faced Brick) Transparent Glass Existing Fired Clay Faced Brick Class 2 Materials: N/A Class 3 Materials: Architectural Metal Panels Class 4 Materials: Steel Siding Material Percentage Break Down Class 1 Materials 8165 sf / 10,392 sf = 79% Class 2 Materials 0 sf / 10,392 sf =0% Class 3 Materials 2116 sf / 10,392 sf = 20% Class 4 Materials 110 sf / 10392 sf = 1% Material Narrative We are proposing using a Fired Clay Faced Brick, Ebony Black Smooth by Belden, as the primary facad material for the addition, this brick doesn't match the existing brick but rather it compliments it adding a different material to break up the original monolithic facade and easily signalling to patrons that this is a significant re-imagining of the original library. This darker brick is also emblematic of newer buildings in cottage grove picking up on similar dark tones found in the Central Fire Station, Glacial Valley Park, and The Ravine Regional Park Building. For a secondary facade material we are proposing using an Architectural Metal Panel, Anodized Diamon Tile by Millennium Forms, this smaller metal tile breaks up the facade to instill a Civic feeling rather than using larger scale panels that may indicate to patrons a undesirable industrial feeling. The panels will be a mix of three different anodized colors creating a graident effect across the facade. This gradient symbolizes waves and natural enviorment that is present in Cottage Grove. Where different materials such as; the existing brick and the new brick as well as the new brick and the architectural metal panel creates a set of unique conditions. These areas are what we are descibing as 'The Confluence', where two materials adds the opportunity to create a blend through corbeling and mixing materials similar to the confluence of the Mississippi River at Cottage Grove. The remainder of the facade is dedicated to Transparent Glass, providing patrons with views and connections both into the libary and to the natural landscape being developed around the library. 1/8" = 1'-0"1B EXTERIOR ELEVATION - SOUTH Copy 1 1/8" = 1'-0"1A EXTERIOR ELEVATION - NORTH Copy 1 ISSUED FOR DATE Copyright Alliiance PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION COMMISSION NO 2025 2025029 EX T E R I O R E L E V A T I O N S C o p y 1 a3 . 0 3 1/8" = 1'-0"1C EXTERIOR ELEVATION - EAST Copy 1 1/8" = 1'-0"1B EXTERIOR ELEVATION - SOUTH Copy 1 1/8" = 1'-0"1D EXTERIOR ELEVATION - WEST Copy 1 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 07/25/2025 PLANNING SUBMISSION 07/30/2025 D E 7/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 3 : 0 4 : 5 0 P M 1/8" = 1'-0"1C EXTERIOR ELEVATION - EAST Copy 1 1/8" = 1'-0"1D EXTERIOR ELEVATION - WEST Copy 1 Park Grove Library - Design Development Open House | July 29th, 2025 East Elevation West Elevation North Elevation South Elevation Design Development | Exterior Development Departme CIRCUL COLLEC COMMU MECHA STAFF O SUPPOR STAFF WORK AREA COMMONS MAIN DESK FOOD PANTRY HOLDS SELF CHECK LITERACY COVE WE L L N E S S RO O M FA M I L Y RR GA L L E R Y W A L L MAIN ENTRY STAFF / SERVICE ENTRY MECH. YARD CO V E R E D W A L K W A Y BOOKDROP CHILDREN’S COLLECTION AND SEATING TO CHILDREN’S STORYTIME BERM TO WEST READING TERRACE TEEN COLLECTION, COMPUTERS, AND SEATING ADULT COLLECTION AND SEATING LEARNING LAB COMPUTERS TEEN GAMING QUIET STUDY HUB STUDY ROOMS RE S T R O O M S LARGE MEETING ROOM Color Key Circulation Collections Community Staff Mechanical Restrooms NORTH Park Grove Library - Design Development Open House | July 29th, 2025 SCALE: 1” = 12’-0” 0’6’ 12’24’ Design Development | Interior Development Plan view of the Library First Floor Plan WEST READING TERRACE LIBRARY BUILDING STORYTIME BERM ENTRY PLAZA NORTH Park Grove Library - Design Development Open House | July 29th, 2025 SCALE: 1” = 15’-0” 0’7’-6” 15’30’ Plan view of the proposed landscape for the libary Landscape Plan Design Development | Site Development Park Grove Library - Design Development Open House | July 29th, 2025 View of the outdoor reading area Perspective - South Children’s Storytime Berm Design Development | Site Development H:\COTT\25X140120000\1_Corres\C_To Others\2025-08-15\140120 Plan Review 2025-08-15.docx MEMORANDUM Date: 08/15/2025 To: Paul Sponholz, PE From: Mike Boex, PE Subject: Park Grove Library City of Cottage Grove, MN Project No.: 24X140120 This memo summarizes the review of site plan documents submitted by Alliiance, dated 7/30/25 (received 8/1/25). Certificate of Survey: 1. City records are attached to this memo related to sewer and water pipe sizes and materials: a. Records depict an existing 4” DIP water service within private property. b. It also appears there may be an additional valve that is paved over/buried, and approximately 30-lf of 8” DIP extending west of the City’s 12” main. Care should be exercised during removals to determine the presence of the valve and/or the 8” main. i. Even if the valve is not present, connection to an existing stub, if present, is preferred. Additional notes should be provided on the utility sheets to confirm existing utilities and coordinate connections with the city. c. 30-lf of 8” VCP sewer pipe also appears to be present west of the city sewer manhole. Sheet C200: 2. Pavement removal limits should reflect the anticipated utility removal limits (e.g. sewer service) in Hemingway Ave. 3. Based on the utility records previously mentioned, if present, consider leaving a portion of the 8” DIP watermain and 8” gate valve. Sheet C300: 4. It is assumed that the table of “Phase 1 BMP Quantities” refers to Phase 2. Sheet C400: 5. Keynote “T” along the south side of the entrance apron: The city does not want the USPS postal box within public right-of-way. Please evaluate options to locate the postal box somewhere within the site. 6. The City plans to prepare plans to improve Hemingway Avenue. Further plan coordination will be necessary as those are developed. Park Grove Library Plan Review Page: 2 a. The Heavy-Duty Concrete Pavement Section (Detail 2/C700) is appropriate for the handicap parking stalls but not the commercial driveway apron. The apron is anticipated to be included in the City’s plans, as are other surface improvements within the public right-of-way. Sheet C500: 7. Freeboard Standards: b. For stormwater facilities with emergency overflows, the low adjacent grade elevation for all new structures must be a minimum of 3 feet above both the peak surface water elevation for the 100-year precipitation event and 2 feet above the emergency overflow elevation of any immediately adjacent new stormwater basin. c. For backyard and side-yard conveyance and temporary ponding areas, there must be at least 1 foot between the overland overflow elevation and the low adjacent grade elevation of the adjacent structure. d. Please label all pond and local drainage EOF locations and elevations, including those along curb lines or other areas where surface water would escape the site. Sheet C600: 8. Add a note to the plans that the proposed 4” PVC sanitary sewer shall provide a booted connection to the city manhole. 9. As previously mentioned, the existing 8” DIP water stub to the site should be investigated, and therefore a new wet tap should be avoided. 10. The existing north-south sanitary sewer along Hemingway Avenue is expected to be 8” VCP, not 12”. 11. Check pipe crossings and clearances. For example, it appears the water and sewer crossings are very close or in conflict. Where applicable, add appropriate notes as to when watermain will be lowered, etc. to maintain minimum vertical clearances. If necessary, the use of city standard detail WAT-7 is recommended. a. Based on previous comments, if the water service remains north of the sanitary service, that crossing may be eliminated. 12. All portions of a new building must be within 300 feet of a fire hydrant or 400 feet if the building is sprinkled. It appears an additional hydrant should be added onsite. Sheet L100: 13. Consider depicting underground utilities to understand tree locations relative to underground piping. Sheet C100 Water/Storm/Sanitary Note #21 indicated 5-ft separation unless a root barrier is utilized. Sheet L200: 14. Details 12 & 13: specify the intended color of the fencing material (e.g. black). Stormwater Comments: 15. HydroCAD: Park Grove Library Plan Review Page: 3 a. Subwatershed DA-2 includes a time of concentration of 0 minutes. Please adjust the time of concentration. The surface water management plan recommends a minimum time of concentration of 8 minutes. b. HydroCAD Pond 1P is simulating 0.8 cfs exfiltration from a 2800 sq. ft. footprint, at a rate of about 12 inches per hour. Please check the exfiltration rate so the rate is in line with the design rates provided in the MN Stormwater Manual (e.g. 0.8 in/hr.). c. Proposed Pond 1P simulates a 100-year high water level of 876.43 feet. The secondary outflow device (Overflow to Street) has a crest elevation of 876.4 feet but shows no outflow while overtopped in the 100-year flood. Please check that the device discharge multiplier is set to 1. 16. New and Fully Reconstructed Impervious Surfaces: The stormwater narrative report and HydroCAD models indicate existing and proposed impervious areas of 1.3 acres. Sheet C200, C300 and C400 indicate existing and proposed impervious areas of 1.2 acres. Please be consistent between the report, models and plans. Please also list the sum of new and fully reconstructed impervious surfaces and compare 1" of runoff from these surfaces to the proposed water quality treatment volume of 3,050 CF. 17. Infiltration System: a. Include notes on the plans indicating how to stage construction and use low-impact earth moving equipment to avoid compaction of the soils under the infiltration system in order to improve the likelihood of successful infiltration. b. Sheet C500 lists the HWL of 876.22 for the Pavedrain Infiltration Basin. The HydroCAD model indicates the Pond 1P (PaveDrain) 100-year peak elevation is 876.43 feet. Please update Sheet C500 to be consistent with the model and also please identify on the plans the EOF location and elevation. 18. Water Quality: The project disturbed area is 1.85 acres. Watershed rules call for a TP loading rate of 0.22 lbs./acre/year or existing loading rates, whichever is less since the project site drains to the Mississippi River. Submit a water quality analysis using a method such as the P8 or MIDS models to demonstrate compliance. a. For water quality analyses using the MIDS or P8 models, the South Washington Watershed District (SWWD) Standards Manual (November 2023) includes required adjustments to the MIDS and P8 models: Model Parameter Required MIDS Retention Requirement 1.0 inch MIDS Total Phosphorus EMC, Change from Default 0.3 mg/l 0.31 mg/l P8 Precipitation and Temperature Files Download modified .pcp and .tmp files from District website P8 Start Date 1-1-1971 P8 Keep Date 1-1-1971 P8 Stop Date 12-31-2000 P8 Number of passes through the storm file 5 P8 Impervious Depression Storage 0.1 P8 Impervious Runoff Coefficient 0.9 Park Grove Library Plan Review Page: 4 P8 Max infiltration rate 0.8 inch/hour P8 Phosphorus Event Mean Concentration Nurp50 particle file P8 Total Suspended Solids Event Mean Concentration Nurp50 particle file The Standards Manual is available at the link below: SWWD_Standards-Guidance-Manual_Final_11062023.pdf (swwdmn.org) If on-site BMPs are not sufficient to meet the water quality total phosphorus loading rates, the purchase of off-site mitigation credits is an option. 19. Rational Storm Sewer Design: On-site storm sewer should be sized to a minimum 5-year rational method design. Submit design calculations for the storm sewer system and a drainage area map showing each catchment with manholes and catch basins labeled. Include individual pipe segment velocities with calculations for review. a. Pipe sizes and slopes should be selected to provide a minimum open channel velocity of 3 feet per second. b. Maximum storm sewer velocities should be kept at 10 feet per second or less. c. When changing pipe sizes in structure, match crown of pipe elevations instead of inverts. d. Please show storm catch basin IDs, pipe sizes, grades, elevations, and drainage areas on the plans consistent with the rational design tables. e. Pipe outlets to wet ponds should be placed at the NWL and have design velocities of 6 fps or less. Pipe outlets into filtration basins or other overland discharge should have design velocities of 4 fps or less. 20. SWPPP: The Erosion Control Sheets and SWPPP might be improved with the following: a. Identify the person(s) who will oversee the implementation of the SWPPP and perform the necessary inspections. b. Explain the entity responsible for long-term operation and maintenance of the stormwater BMPs. c. List the training and certifications of the SWPPP designers, inspectors and overseers. d. Sheet C200 Phase 1 note calls for stabilized construction entrance. Please show the construction entrance on plan sheets and list within BMP quantities. 21. Testing: Please add the following to the infiltration basin plan notes: “Post construction testing of the infiltration rate and drawdown period will be required.” Post construction testing should yield results of approximately twice the design rate, providing a safety factor consistent with Section 16.11 of the NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit. If test results exceed 8.3 inches per hour, Section 16.16 requires that soils be amended to slow the infiltration rate below 8.3 inches per hour. 22. Models: Please note that digital copies of the final version stormwater models and shapefiles or CAD drawings of existing and proposed drainage areas are to be submitted to the city once the review and revision process is complete. 23. A Stormwater Management Agreement will need to be executed for all BMPs installed with the site. The City will provide the agreement for signature prior to site grading.